ELEMENTS OF THOUGHT OR, FIRST LESSONS IN THE KNOWLEDGE MIND INCLUDING FAMILIAR EXPLANATIONS OF THE TERMS EM- PLOYED ON SUBJECTS RELATING TO THE INTELLECTUAL POWERS. BY ISAAC TAYLOR, JUNIOR. Nee manus nuda, nee Intellectus sibi permissus, multiim valet:— Bacon. LONDON: PUBLISHED BY B. J. HOLDSWORTH, 18, st. Paul's church-yard. 1822. £»+£*« <%K~* -*-Uv \ ®-*-£cuwio"jxa — a false argument. The word is not usually applied to mere errors in reasoning ; but to those errors in reasoning of which the persons who main- tain them are, in some degree, conscious ; and which they endeavour to conceal from examination by subtilty, and by some am- biguity, or other unfairness in the use of words. In books of Logic are to be found artifi- cial classifications of the various kinds of Sophisms, with rules for detecting the fal- lacies on which they rest. But it requires much attention, and some acuteness, as well as frequent exercise in disputation, to be able to make a ready or immediate use of these abstract rules and distinctions. There are, however, two or three plain considerations and directions which may tend to secure the mind from the danger of having important principles shaken or overthrown by sophis- tical reasonings. I. There are some characteristics of so- phistical reasoning, by observing which it i3 174 ELEMENTS OF THOUGHT. may often be suspected, and its influence destroyed, when we are not able to detect and expose the fallacy. 1st. Sophistical reasoning is commonly subtile in its style ; and the force of the argu- ment is made to depend upon niceties and refinements in the use of words. A sophis- tical reasoner will rarely consent to state his argument in any other than the precise terms which he has artfully selected. On the con- trary, Truth, as it is independent of words, may, generally, be stated, with nearly equal advantage, in several forms of expression. He who defends what he understands, and what he honestly believes, is generally less solicitous about particular phrases, than he who is conscious of reasoning sophistically. 2d. When sophistical reasoning is not crafty and circuitous, it is often abrupt and offensive : there is an attempt to force assent by some seeming demonstration, which will leave no room for reply ; and this, even in subjects plainly beyond the reach of demon- stration. Now, it should constantly be borne in mind, when questions are discussed which have long been debated in the world, ELEMENTS OF THOUGHT. 175 that, if these pretended demonstrations were as sound and good as, to those who hear them for the first time, they may seem to be, they would, long ago, have settled the controversy in question. Demonstrative reasoning either supersedes all controversy ; or it is utterly useless : — it is good for every thing ; or it is good for nothing. Truth leads the mind : Sophistry drives it. 3d. Sophistical reasoning is very com- monly advanced in the smart, flippant style of a repartee, or an epigram. Indeed, it will be generally found that those who are habitually sophistical reasoners, are, in their natural tempers, either crafty, disingenuous, and cold ; or self-complacent, flashy, and ironical. Dogmatism must not be reckoned among the symptoms of sophistry ; because it very often results from the full and serious conviction of truth in a strong understand- ing, joined to an arrogant or irritable temper. II. We should never estirctate the sound- ness of principles by our own ability to defend them ; or consider an objection as unanswerable, to which we can find no reply. It is an absurd self-confidence, es- i4 176 ELEMENTS OF THOUGHT. pecially in a young" person, to abandon his principles as soon as he may find himself worsted in argument. There is no defence against flippant sophistry so effectual as an intelligent modesty. Indeed, genuine firm- ness of mind consists greatly in an habitual recollection of our own moderate powers and acquirements. Let us suppose the case of a person who has a common knowledge of astronomy : he has learned that the great law of planetary motion is, that the squares of the periodical times of the Planets, are as the cubes of their distances from the centres of their orbits. He understands this doctrine, and the manner in which it is proved in a general way, and he knows that is the received opinion among men of science. Now he happens to meet with a sophist, whose mathematical acquirements, and whose readiness in calculation are considerably greater than his own. This sophist undertakes to prove that the estab- lished doctrine is unfounded ; and he pre- tends, by some short and unanswerable process, to detect a capital error in the calculations by which it is usually proved. ELEMENTS OF THOUGHT. 177 What then does this person do? — does he say — ' Yes, I see we have all been mistaken ; your reasoning is unanswerable ; I there- fore candidly confess my former error ?' — ,No one who has a common measure of good sense would act thus in the case supposed. If he found a difficulty in reconciling the sophist's apparent demonstrations with es- tablished principles, he would put that diffi- culty wholly to the account of his own ignorance and incompetency ; and would refer it to those who may be able to explain to him the fallacy by which he has been embarrassed. The same conduct, influenced by the same modesty, would, in most cases, be the best, as it is in fact the most reason- able manner of treating crafty or sarcastic sophistry. III. Sophistical reasoning is very com- monly founded upon an ambiguous use of those words which signify complex abstract notions ; such, for example, as some of those mentioned page 56. The highly important habit, therefore, of regarding things and notions apart from words, and of analysing all complex abstract notions, affords the i5 178 ELEMENTS OF THOUGHT. best intellectual security against the im- pression of fallacious reasoning. When a sophistical argument is proposed to a person accustomed to think abstractedly and ana- lytically, he will, in the first place, examine each principal term employed, and, in so doing, he will rarely fail to discover that one of them is used in two senses, or in a sense altogether improper, or inapplicable to the subject. Sophisms may consist in proving some thing which is beside the question ; or in artfully changing the real point in dispute. Thus, if it be affirmed that the tendency of Christianity is much more favourable to public and private virtue, than that of any other religious system, or than Atheism ; an opponent may change the point in dispute, by proving that many professors of Christi- anity have been worthless and licentious men ; or by proving that some Idolaters and some Atheists have been blameless in their exter- nal conduct. The real points to be deter- mined are these : — whether Nations, taken at large, in which Christianity has prevailed, or in which the Bible has been actually read ELEMENTS OF THOUGHT. 179 and regarded by the mass of the people, have not greatly surpassed in morality those Nations to whom it has been wholly un- known, or by whom it has been little re- garded : And then, — whether, if any number of the most apparently sincere Christians is compared with an equal number of the best heathens or deists, they will not be found to possess a sort of virtue much more complete, more pure, and more beneficent. Many Sophisms consist in taking for granted the very point to be proved. Thus, if it be argued that a man who is just and temperate need not concern himself with matters of faith, or forms of religion, because a just and temperate man is virtuous, and therefore must always be the object of the Divine favour. The thing to be proved, — namely, whether justice and temperance, without piety, constitute that virtue which will be approved by God, is taken for granted, by calling the merely just and temperate man, virtuous. Sophisms are sometimes framed by as- signing a wrong cause to some effect. There is a sophism of this kind when it is 16 180 ELEMENTS OF THOUGHT. said that Christianity has caused many bloody wars, cruel persecutions, and bar- barous massacres. While in fact, it has been the ferocious passions of men, made more ferocious by the rebuke they have received from the pure and peaceful spirit of Christi- anity, which have been the real causes of these wars and persecutions. Sophisms often arise from drawing in- ferences on insufficient grounds : (See In- duction. Inference); or when some effect is supposed to be constant, which is only accidental : or when some law of nature, or rule is stated to be universally true, which, in fact, is liable to many exceptions. Per- sons who guide their conduct by maxims are very liable to deceive themselves by sophisms of this sort. There is, perhaps, some general truth contained in their favourite sayings : but when such maxims are made the rules of conduct, they require a careful observation of the particular cir- cumstances to which they are applied. A large proportion of the pointed proverbs which tickle the ears of the vulgar, are mere sophisms of this class. It may be observed ELEMENTS OF THOUGHT. 181 that wide and various information is apt to render cultivated minds over cautious in calculating upon the exceptions to general laws ; while uncultivated minds, almost always, make a rude and blind use of general rules, without regard to exceptions. Whatever may be the nature of a sophism it is always disguised by some indistinctness, ambiguity, or impropriety in one or more of the words by which it is expressed. A general rule therefore for detecting the fallacy of sophistical reasoning is, to oblige those who advance it to define every principal word employed, to analyse every complex abstract notion, and to use words constantly in the same sense. See Judgement. Reasoning. Space. We obtain the notion of Extension by comparing what is seen, with what is felt : after we have gained this notion, we are able, in thought, to take from it what we learn by touch,— -or the notion of some thing which resists our movements. Space, then, is the word we employ to signify the notion of Extension, after we have taken from it the notion of Solidity. The way in which 182 ELEMENTS OF THOUGHT. this notion is acquired may thus be described, but as it is a simple abstract notion, it cannot be analysed. Species, and Genus. See Ghap. V. Subject; that concerning which something is affirmed ; or that to which some quality belongs. See Proposition. Essence. Adjunct. Substance. It is natural to us to imagine that there is some thing to which all the qualities of things belong ; therefore we speak of solidity, and extension, and shape, and colour, as the qualities of a something, — we know not what, which we call matter ; and then we say that matter is an extended and solid Substance. The mind is called a thinking Substance. Whatever there may be in things, we know nothing further than what we perceive of their various sensible qualities. The word Substance, if used in distinction from all the qualities of things, only expresses our supposition of somewhat of which we know nothing. See Affection. Succession. The consciousness of one thought following another perpetually, gives us the notion of duration. The estimate ELEMENTS OF THOUGHT. 183 which we form of the length of any portion of time depends, partly, upon the number of thoughts which has passed through the mind ; and partly, upon the liveliness with which we remember them : a long day is one in which a multitude of agreeable thoughts has passed through the mind. A year seems longer in youth than in more advanced life ; . because, in youth, the attention is less fixed upon single objects ; and the course of the thoughts is more rapid, and more often diverted into new directions. See Duration. Suggestion. Our minds are so formed, that thoughts which have once been brought to- gether, are afterwards apt to return to the mind together. The course of the thoughts, when they are left to flow on without any direction from the Will, seems to be governed by the connexions which have been ac- cidentally formed among them. If we attempt to trace back the wanderings of our thoughts, we shall generally be able to discover some connexion between ideas, which has led the mind, in the course of a few minutes, to be occupied with the most 184 ELEMENTS OF THOUGHT. widely different things. Often it is merely some likeness in the sound of words which ties thoughts together : often it is some similarity in the feeling of pleasure, or displeasure, towards two different objects : often, the sight of an object will bring into the mind the thoughts which happened to engage us when we last saw it. Even when we endeavour to direct our thoughts by an act of the Will, we still, more or less, follow the natural or the accidental connexions which have been formed among them ; and the difference observable in men's way of thinking, when they direct their minds to the same objects, depends, greatly, upon what it is which usually suggests their thoughts. One man's thoughts are sug- gested, chiefly, by words, and forms of expression, which have been stored in the memory : such a person will think rapidly, and speak fluently, and with much pro- priety ; but he will not often bring forward what is new. Another man's thoughts are suggested, chiefly, by the feelings he is most subject to, — such as benevolence, or anger, or contempt, or the love of freedom, ELEMENTS OF THOUGHT. 185 or the sense of religion. Such a man will bring forward thoughts that are so proper to the occasion on which he writes, or speaks, that he will easily lead other men into the same feelings ; but he will not be able to think well, except when his feelings are excited. Another man's thoughts are chiefly sug- gested by the real resemblances or analogies or differences of things ; without regard to words, or other men's opinions. Such a man will think philosophically. To have the thoughts thus suggested by the real nature of things, and not by words ; or by the moral feelings; or by the pleasures of the fancy, constitutes what is called the philoso- phical spirit. It is often not difficult to dis- cover from a man's conversation, what habit or feeling it is which usually suggests his thoughts ; and when we discover this, we may see the reason of much that he says ; and often anticipate what opinion he will ex- press on a particular subject. The actions of animals proceed imme- diately from the suggestions which take place in their minds ; and these suggestions 186 ELEMENTS OF THOUGHT. are caused by their perceptions or sensations. The actions of animals, therefore, in given circumstances, may generally be antici- pated with certainty. The words and actions of children chiefly flow, also, from the suggestions of the moment : they may, therefore, often be anticipated, or, at least their words and actions may afterwards be accounted for, by our knowledge of the suggestions from which they flow. In the idle, continued, and multifarious chattering of a child, it is often possible to perceive chains of suggestions very similar to those which take place in dreaming. In proportion as the mind by habit becomes active, the natural and accidental chains of suggestion are interrupted, and words and actions are directed by Reason. See Chap. III. Syllogism, from cuxXoyia-fjiog — a collection of reasons. An inference from what we already know or believe to be true, when it is put into three propositions is called a Syllogism: for example : — 1. No one can be happy who lives in continual fear : 2. A miser lives in continualfear ; ELEMENTS OF THOUGHT. 187 8. Therefore, a miser cannot be happy. This is only a more formal way of de- claring what must be granted as soon as it is stated, — namely, — That a miser cannot be happy; because he lives in continual fear. In a Syllogism, the first two propositions are called the Premises ; because they are 'the things premised or put before ; they are also called the Antecedents : the first of them is called the Major, and the second the Minor. The third proposition, which contains the thing to be proved is called the Conclusion. Reasoning by Syllogism was once sup- posed to be the only method of discovering truth. It is, in fact, only a method of stating formally and distinctly what we already know or believe. Synthesis, from trvvQsmg — a putting together- Synthesis is opposed to Analysis : when the parts or elements of any thing have been discovered by analysis, we have then learnt how to compound them again, so as to produce the same complex body : this com- pounding is called Synthesis. 188 ELEMENTS OF THOUGHT. Testimony, is the declaration of one who professes to know the truth of that which he affirms. By far the greater part of all which we believe, and of all which, in a common way of speaking 1 , we are said to know, depends upon Testimony. Men rely con- fidently upon Testimony in conducting their most important concerns : and the human mind is so formed that it is more natural to us to trust to Testimony, than to doubt it. We should believe it entirely, and con- stantly, if we did not find that it is some- times fallacious. There are two ways in which Testimony may be fallacious : — 1st. He who declares a thing may be mistaken : or,— 2nd. He may design to deceive those to whom he speaks. In judging of the truth of Testimony, we must, therefore, in the first place, consider, whether it is possible, or likely, that the Witness may have been himself deceived in the thing which he affirms : for example ; — If a Witness declares that he has been robbed and beaten on the road ; we know that this is a matter in which he cannot be mistaken : but if he says that such, or such ELEMENTS OF THOUGHT. 189 a man, was the robber, it is possible that in this, he may be mistaken ; and if the robbery happened after sun-set, it is probable that he may be mistaken. We here estimate the value of the Testimony by considering the nature of the case. When it has been thus determined how far we may be sure that the Witness is not him- self mistaken ; we must next endeavour to discover whether he designs to deceive us. Now we may judge of the veracity of a Witness, in four ways : — - 1st. By what may be known of his general character. This is, indeed, the chief ground of our confidence in Testimony. We be- lieve a friend, of whose integrity we have no doubt, even when he declares what may seem highly improbable : while to a known liar, we hardly give credit in the most com- mon matters. The veracity of men who have lived in distant ages may also be judged of, where history has recorded the general course of their lives ; or where they have left writings, by which their principles and tempers may be known ; because human nature has been the same in all ages. 190 ELEMENTS OF THOUGHT. 2nd. We judge of the veracity of a Wit- ness, by considering whether he is likely to be influenced by any motive of interest or passion, to give false Testimony, in this particular case ; or whether, on the contrary, it would not have been to his advantage, to have given a very different Testimony. When a Witness declares that which brings upon himself losses, or dangers, or death, his Testimony has the highest kind of con- firmation. 3rd. We may, in general, very safely judge of the veracity of a Witness by com- paring one part of his narrative with another. The several parts of any story which has been invented to deceive, will, almost cer- tainly, be fouud not to accord with each other ; especially in lesser particulars : what a false Witness says at one time, will not agree with what he says at another : or what he says from premeditation, will contradict what he affirms when he answers an unex- pected question. 4th The truth may, almost always, be discovered, where there is an opportunity of comparing the Testimony of different ELEMENTS OF THOUGHT. 191 witnesses of the same fact. A number of false witnesses will be sure, in some circum- stances, to contradict each other ; and besides ; — as nothing but some strong motive can induce many persons to agree together to support the same untruth, it will be evident where any such common interest exists. But when many witnesses of dif- ferent ranks in life, different ages, and different private interests, agree in all the principal points of a story, we feel confident in the truth of the Testimony. It is by such methods that the truth of Testimony is determined in Courts of law : and when a fact proved by Testimony, is confirmed by these, or similar rules, no reasonable person can honestly pretend to doubt it : and, indeed, many criminals are adjudged to death where the evidence is very far from being satisfactory in all the respects which have been mentioned. Now, if we apply these four rules to ihe Testimony which supports the histories contained in the New Testament, we find that it is confirmed by each of them. 192 ELEMENTS OF THOUGHT. All the principal and most remarkable facts in these histories are of such a kind, that it is impossible the witnesses should have been themselves deceived in what they relate : for example, the instantaneous healing of the sick ; the restoration of the blind ; the mak- ing the maimed whole ; the raising of the dead ; the feeding thousands from a few loaves ; and all these things done in the pre- sence of large assemblies, many of whom viewed what was done with envy, and the eager desire to find occasion of cavil. No one witness in the possession of his faculties, could be deceived in such matters ; much less, hundreds or thousands of witnesses. Then, if we come to judge of the vera- city of these witnesses ; there is abundant proof, — In the first place — that they were honest men : not only are the writings which record these facts remarkably artless in their style ; but their tendency is so plainly favourable to virtue, and so strongly opposed to all vice, that it is impossible to imagine that the writers were themselves wicked men, and impostors: such a supposition is far more ELEMENTS OF THOUGHT. 193 incredible than that the dead should come from their graves ; because this, although it is a fact different from what we have ourselves ever seen ; yet, it is what we know God can do when he pleases ; but the other is con- trary to what we know of human nature. Nothing can be imagined more strange or incredible, than that the very first hook that was ever published in the world, con- taining a perfect system of morality, — and the book which has, in fact, introduced more virtue among men, than any other, should have been written by impostors. In the second place, — it appears, that their Testimony constantly brought perse- cution upon these Witnesses. We know from the Roman Historians, as well as from the Writers of the New Testament, that many thousand persons, — men, women, and children, suffered every misery, and the most cruel deaths, solely because they persisted in their Testimony. Now, what they testified, was not their belief in some opinion, in which they might have been mistaken ; but they testified that they had seen the eyes of the blind opened, the sick healed, and the dead raised. Those, there- K 194 ELEMENTS OF THOUGHT. fore, who first witnessed to the truth of Christianity, knowingly brought the worst bodily evils upon themselves by so doing. Even if it were possible to suppose that a few men would act in this way, it is certain that multitudes of all nations, many of whom were feeble and timid women and children, could never be induced to undergo torture and death for the sake of affirming what they knew to be false. In the third place, it appears, that the Testimony of the first Christians was most sedulously examined. This was in- cessantly done by the Jewish and Roman Magistrates, who earnestly desired to prove that Christianity was a mere delusion ; and if there had indeed been any fraud, it would, most certainly, have been soon detected and brought into disgrace, by the frequent in- stances in which the Christians would have contradicted their own testimony, given at different times, or that of their brethren. But, in fact, the enemies of the Christians found that it was useless to attempt to deny the reality of the miracles wrought by them : all they could do was, either to force them by torture to renounce their faith, or to ELEMENTS OF THOUGHT. 195 put them to death. What has been observed concerning the third rule, above mentioned, applies also to the fourth. It may be added that the truth of the Testimony of the first Christians is confirmed by the many thousands of idolaters, — the learned as well as the ignorant, in every part of the Roman Empire, who are known to have become Christians in the first century, while miracles continued to be wrought in all places, daily. The Testimony of the first Christians is also confirmed by what is recorded concerning their numbers, their sufferings, and their constancy, by the heathen historians ; espe- cially by Tacitus, Suetonius and Pliny. The sum, of what has been said, there- fore, is this : — I. That the Christian Religion, like all the most important concerns of life, requires men to rely upon Testimony. II. That the Testimony which supports the Christian Religion is so satisfactorily confirmed, that it cannot be rejected, unless we admit many suppositions which are con- trary to every thing that we know of human nature : whereas, that God should work miracles to establish a holy religion, is not k2 196 ELEMENTS OF THOUGHT. contrary to what we might expect; but per- fectly agreeable to our notions of the Divine power, and goodness. This Testimony of the Apostles and first Christians, then, is worthy to be received ; — 1st. Because, from the nature and ten- dency of their writings, the history of their lives, and the confession of their enemies, it is certain that they were honest and pious men. 2nd. Because their Testimony brought no worldly advantage to themselves, but, on the contrary, miseries and death. 3rd. Because the Jewish and Roman Magistrates were unable to detect any con- tradiction, fraud, or delusion, among the thousands of witnesses whom they examined, which they would certainly have done, if real miracles had not been wrought. See Belief. Theory, is distinguished from Practice : it is thinking, not doing. Theory directs Practice. The word Theory is often used nearly in the same sense as the word Hypothesis : they may be distinguished thus ; — an Hypo- thesis is a guess or supposition, made con- cerning the cause of some particular fact, with the view of trying experiments, or of making observations to discover the truth. ELEMENTS OF THOUGHT. 197 A Theory is a complete system of suppo- sitions, put together for the purpose of explaining all the facts that belong to some one Science : For example: — Astronomers have suggested many Hypo- theses, in order to account for the luminous stream which follows Comets. They have also formed many Theories of the heavens ; , or, in other words, — complete explanations of all the appearances of the heavenly bodies, and their movements. When a Theory has been generally received by men of science, it is called a System ; — as the Ptolomaic System; the Copernican System; the New- tonian System, Time, is Duration measured into equal parts. This measurement is made, either by obser- vation of the motions of the heavenly bodies, or by the movement of machines. We learn to think of Duration chiefly, as it is measured; therefore the word Time is more often used than the word Duration. See Duration. Succession. Truth, is the agreement, either of words or other signs with the thoughts which they are employed to represent; or it is the agree- ment of notions with the things to which k3 198 ELEMENTS OF THOUGHT. they belong. The word, Truth, therefore, expresses nothing more than a relation of agreement perceived by the mind. The truth of Words or propositions de- pends upon the use of words, or forms of expression in the sense which they will convey to the mind of him with whom we speak. With respect to the truth of Notions, an important distinction must be made : some notions may be perfectly true : others can only be imperfectly true : for example; — the notion which we may have of a triangle, and all its properties, may perfectly agree with that mathematical figure. But the notions which we have of the works and operations of nature, or of our own minds, or of other intelligent beings, and especially of the Divine Being, can, at best, be only imper- fectly true ; because we know scarcely more than some few unconnected facts concerning these things. The notion which a child has of the Moon, who supposes that it is fastened in the sky, like a lamp upon a wall, and that it is the size of a plate, is altogether false. An astronomer's notion of the Moon, is true, — but it is imperfectly true : he knows its shape, its size, its distance from the ELEMENTS OF THOUGHT. 199 Earth, and the laws of its motions ; but this is not a thousandth part of what he might know if he could he carried thither, and remain there some years. Now the first business of sound instruction is to free the mind from those many false notions which, like weeds, spring" up of themselves ; and then to impart true notions in their stead. The second part of instruction, is to make the mind fully aware of the unavoidable imperfection of the greater part of all our notions. A presumptuous confidence in the truth and sufficiency of our notions, is the greatest hinderance to the acquirement of real knowledge. It is not enough to be free from positive errors : we ought to know distinctly where we are ignorant ; or where knowledge ends. This is indispensible, in order that we may be at once, humble, and disposed to receive further information. The most important part of wisdom, in regard to the state of the understanding, consists in this knowledge of our ignorance. It has been from the want of it, that learned men have so often invented the most absurd theories to account for the appearances of nature, rather than modestly k4 200 ELEMENTS OF THOUGHT. confess their ignorance. And it is also from the want of this sort of wisdom, in matters of Religion, that men, who fancy themselves wise, refuse to learn what God has been pleased to reveal concerning his own nature, or his conduct in governing the world : — pretending to know, without the light of Revelation, what God is, and how he ought to act. They thus prove that they do not know where they are ignorant: — 'professing themselves to be wise, they become fools.' However great may be the powers of their minds, or their acquirements, they are, in this respect, like uneducated persons, whose pre- sumption, in matters of science, is worse than their mere ignorance, and who generally maintain, with the greatest obstinacy, their most absurd errors. The proper state of the mind, therefore, in regard to the truth of its notions consists, — 1st. in not holding false notions, when true notions are attainable ; and 2nd. in knowing distinctly which of our notions are perfectly true, and which are, from the nature of the things to which they relate, only imperfectly true. END OF PART II. ELEMENTS OF THOUGHT. 201 A SUMMARY, EXHIBITING THE CONNEXION AND RELATION OF THE TERMS EXPLAINED IN THE PRECEDING VOCABULARY. One of the Primary Notions of the Mind, resulting from the property which chiefly dis- tinguishes Mind from Matter is that of Power. The notion of Power suggests the corres- pondent notions of Cause, and Effect: and those of Liberty, or Contingency ; opposed to Necessity. The words Active, and Passive, express the state of things to which the notions of Cause and Effect are attributed. A change produced in the Mind by Material causes, through the organs of sense, is called Sensation. Sensations immediately referred by the Mind to external causes are called Perceptions. The object of a Perception, recurring to the Mind without the actual presence of the material cause by which it was first produced, is called an Idea. The Mind by attributing its Sensations to external causes, and by regarding its Percep- 202 ELEMENTS OF THOUGHT. tions as proceeding from a source distinct from the changes which take place within itself, learns to distinguish between Matter, and Mind. Matter occasions in the Mind the abstract notions expressed by the words Extension, Divisibility, Figure, Motion, Solidity, (or Resistance, in the different degrees of Hardness, Softness, Fluidity, &c.) These are called the Primary qualities of Matter; distinguished from its Secondary qualities, such as Sound, Colour, Taste, Smell, Heat ; &e. From considering several different qualities as united in one body, the Mind comes to make the imaginary distinction between Substance, and its Modes, or Affections : or, between the Subject, and its Adjuncts, Attributes, or Accidents. And, from the belief that certain qualities are constantly and indissolubly joined together, results the notion of Essence, or Nature. The act of the Mind in recalling Ideas is named Conception, Ideas are recalled and variously composed by an exercise of Imagination. The Imagination, when excited by emotions of pleasure produces Poetical Invention. ELEMENTS OF THOUGHT. 203 The natural or accidental connexions by which Ideas are linked together in the Mind are termed the Association of Ideas : and these Associations, causing a connected and continued flow of Ideas through the Mind, re- gulate, or indirectly influence Suggestions. Ideas occurring along with the notion of a past state of the Mind, are said to be retained by the faculty of Memory. From Memory re- sult the notions of Succession, and Duration, or Time. The recollection furnished by Memory of a continued succession of changes in the Mind suggests the reflected notion of self ; called Consciousness : the simple abstract notion of Being or Existence : and the persuasion of Personal Identity. The multitude of Ideas which have been de- posited in the Mind tend, without any conscious effort to fall into sorts or parcels, according to the resemblances which exist among them : Thus are formed General Notions. General Notions are marked and fixed by the use of ar- bitrary Signs which are employed as General, or Common Terms. From this involuntary formation of General 204 ELEMENTS OF THOUGHT. Notions, and from the use of General Terms, the Mind learns to relieve itself from perplexity and confusion among the multiplicity of its Ideas by Classification; founded upon the observation of resemblances and differences : hence results the sorting of individuals into Genera and Species. From the Distinctions upon which such classifications are formed result Definitions. These artificial operations are signified by the word Method : which by Disposition, or Divi- sion, and Distribution, produces Order. Most Perceptions are multifarious, or com- plex ; presenting distinct qualities, variously combined, in different objects. Hence the Mind is accustomed to regard qualities, either as at- tached to some substance, when they are spoken of as Concrete ; or separately and singly, by an effort of Abstraction. Efforts of Abstraction continued in relation to a complex object as long as any differences are perceived, produce an Analysis. This Analysis may be followed by recomposition, or Synthesis. From the faculty of Abstraction proceeds Mechanical Invention ; and from the faculty of ELEMENTS OF THOUGHT. 205 Abstraction originate most of those differences between Man and inferior Animals which dis- tinguish what is called Reason from Instinct. Ideas or Notions combined according to the connexions or relations which actually exist among the objects of them, constitute what is called Knowledge. Such combinations, ex- pressed in words, and formed into Propositions, when compared with the things to which they relate, suggest the relative notion of Truth. Knowledge, or the perception of the actual connexions and relations of things, is accom- panied with a pleasurable emotion. When an occasion is presented to the Mind of acquiring Knowledge, this pleasurable emotion produces the state of Mind called Attention. The act of the mind in receiving Knowledge at the instant when attention begins is called Intuition. When a longer effort of attention is required, in order deliberately to compare objects or notions, so as to perceive the relation or con- nexion between them, the mind is said to exercise Judgement. From such comparisons result abstract no- tions of Relation, — as the Relations of 206 ELEMENTS OF THOUGHT. Sameness, or Difference ; of Agreement, or Disagreement ; &c. &c. A comparison, when perfected, and ex- pressed in words, is called a Proposition. Propositions are distinguished as Affirmative, or Negative ; Universal, or Particular ; &c. A Proposition expressing some relation or connexion perceived by Intuition is called an Axiom. A Proposition perceived to result from, or to depend upon some known fact, or some Pro- position already proved, is called an Inference. The connexion or relation between two facts exhibited by a series of Inferences, each de- pending upon the one which precedes it, is called Reasoning. When the connexion or relation between facts may be known infallibly, the process of Reasoning is called a Demonstration. Where the connexion or relation affirmed to exist between two facts can not be fully and infallibly perceived, the Proposition expressing such a connexion is called an Opinion : and the intermediate Propositions by means of which the connexion of the two facts is endeavoured to be proved, are called Arguments; or Reasons. Opinions are susceptible of different degrees ELEMENTS OF THOUGHT. 207 of Probability; according to the nature and the amount of the Evidence on which they rest. The state of the mind in admitting an opinion diners according" to the estimate made of its probability; and is either Belief, or Doubt. When, (owing to the influence of some im- proper motive) Belief is disproportion ed to the evidence which has been adduced, such an opinion is called a Prejudice. A Proposition which affirms an apparent, but not a real connexion is a Sophism. Uncertain Inferences, deduced from a mere resemblance, where the real connexion of facts is not known, are said to rest upon Analogy. The preceding terms belong chiefly to the abstract branches of knowledge. When the qualities and changes of material Substances are the objects of inquiry, a different set of terms is employed. The first objects upon which attention is fixed, with the view of acquiring knowledge, are called Facts. Facts are known by Obser- vation, or Testimony. Facts from which Inferences are drawn, are called Data : or, a Fact noticed with a view to philosophical inquiry, is called a Phenomenon. 208 ELEMENTS OF THOUGHT. The collecting of many similar or connected Facts, from which some general Inference is to be drawn, is called Induction. The design of such inquiries is to discover, among a multitude of Facts, which are uni- formly consequent, the one upon the other, as Cause and Effect. In order to make these connexions of Cause and Effect apparent, and to distinguish them from inconstant or accidental connexions, a supposition or Hypothesis must be made, upon which is founded a trial or Experiment. A collection of Hypothesis, relating to the same subject is called a Theory. A collection of Facts, sorted into pairs or series of Causes and Effects, after Induction and Experiment, constitutes a Science. This knowledge of Causes and Effects, when applied to some practical purpose, is called an Art. When the knowledge of Causes and Effects is employed to give a new direction to the operations of Nature, the results are said to be Artificial. the end. Primed by Meggy and Chalk, Chelmsford. NOV -1 \%k CORRECTIONS. Page 9, line 12, read, they afford. 27, — 4, from the bottom, read, complex notions. 61, — 12, read, Belles Lettres. 93, — 2, from the bottom, read, ./Eneid. 144, — 11, read, commit injuries. 1 /2, last line, read, Upo$. Deacidified using the Bookkeeper process. Neutralizing agent: Magnesium Oxide Treatment Date: July 2004 PreservationTechnologies A WORLD LEADER IN PAPER PRESERVATION 1 1 1 Thomson Park Drive Cranberry Township, PA 16066 (724)779-2111