vm>fy.wA^M*A^/^jMvyj^/>y/xwjf - >Kem'/? ;: 3S>. PIMPipMMi 095 i^ ?^?;;^555J5fi^-^^?^gS mktimm^fmmiim Hh rmmmmmmmttmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmtm/ftm^ mtmfmmm iariBtMi^if»$mim0*eitmmm^^ ]C773SUW07=:^ JbjteaaMax / INTERNATIONA u E ITIONS, PARIS-PHILADELPHIA-VIENNA. BY CHARLES GINUklEZ. Architect, of France, PROFESSOR JAMES M. HART, of United States. New York : A. S. BARNES & CO. 1878. Copvright. 1878, By A. S. Barnes & Co. < ;-^^ J' CONTENTS. PAGE The Paris International Exhibition, 1878, ^ 5 By CHARLES GINDRIEZ, Architect. Vienna and the Centennial, 22 By Prokessor JAMES M. HART. Comp anion Volu-ine. n - -{ RLD'S FAIR, PHILADELPHIA, \m A CRITICAL ACCOUNT. By Professor FRANCIS A. WALKER, of Yale College, (Chief of the Biireaii of Awards at the CeJttennial Exhibition.) Cloth, 8vo. Price, 50 Cents. BY THE SAME PUBLISHERS: ATLAS ESSAYS, in Three Volumes. YOLTJME I.— AMERICAN CURRENCY. THE MONEY PROBLEM Amasa Walker, LL.D. THE CURRENCY QUESTION Amasa Walker, LL.D. Glofh, 8vo, Flexible. Price, 50 Cents. VOLUME II.— BIOGRAPHY AND CRITICISM. LORD MACAULAY Edward A. Freeman, LL.D. GEORGE TICKNOR Edwin D. Whipple ERNST CURTIUS ....Robert P. Keep, Ph.D. PHILIP GILBERT HAMERTON George Lowell Austin. HENRY WADSWORTH LONGFELLOW Ray Palmer, D.D. WILLIAM CULLEN BRYANT Ray Palmer, D.D. EDGAR ALLAN POE ....John H. Ingram. CHARLES TENNYSON Andrew J. Symington.. EDWARD A FREEMAN Henry Coppee, LL.D. CHARLES SUMNER George F. Magoun, D.D. JOHN STUART MILL Noah Porter, LL.D. MILL AS A RELIGIOUS PHILOSOPHER Noah Porter, LL.D. Cloth. 8vo, 272 Pages, Boards. Price, $1.50. VOLUME III— SOCIAL AND POLITICAL PROBLEMS. THE WORKING CLASSES IN EUROPE.... Thomas Hughes, M.P. LABOR IN ENGLAND Thomas Brassey, M.P. GRANGERISM Dr. Francis Wharton. THE GRANGE AND THE POTTER LAW.. By a Granger THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC General Franz Sigel. INDIAN CITIZENSHIP Francis A.Walker, Indian Com. THE CHINESE QUESTION Dr. E. D Mansfield, of Ohio. THE GUARANTEE OF ORDER AND REPUB-^.,^^^ T, ^ rnm t.^^ LICAN GOVERNMENT IN THE STATES, ^J^dge i. ivi. l.oole^ . SOME CHECKS AND BALANCES^ ,^^^^ t, ,. nr.r..^.r IN GOVERNMENT, \ J"^^^ ^- ^^- ^°^^^^- THE DIFFICULTIES OF REPUB-^ FmvAi.T. A Fpkpmam tt n LICANISM IN EUROPE, ^ Eduard A. Freeman, LLD. Cloth, 8vD, 184 Pages. Price, $1. THE PARIS INTERNATIONAL EXHIBITION OF 1878/ ORGANIZATION. ON the report of M. Teisserenc de Bort, Minister of Agriculture and Commerce, the President of the French RepubHc, Mar- shal de MacMahon, decreed, on the 4th of April, 1876, that a great exhibition of agricultural and industrial products would be opened in Paris on the ist of May, 1878, to be closed on the 31st of October following, and that all foreign nations would be invited to take part in it. Immediately the project was laid before the Superior Commis- sion for International Exhibitions, who had to decide on two much- discussed points : First. Would the exhibition be held inside or outside of Paris? Second. Were the buildings to be permanent or temporary? Certainly there seems to be something abnormal in the fact of erecting vast, and in some instances elegant, rich, and even durable buildings, to pull them down afterwards. One is vexed at the thought of so much spoiled material, such useless expense and barren efforts. In a few months the vast spaces are cleared, and the great undertaking leaves no more trace than a phantasmagoria or a dream. Is it then impossible to plan a building which might answer the double purpose of a great exhibition first and of some other object afterwards? The answer is, that it is extremely difificult to find another use for such large buildings ; it seems as if they could be employed for other great exhibitions only. This conclusion would give great weight to a theory upheld by some distinguished men, and quite recently by the Rcviie d' ArchitcctiLrc Frangaise, according to which these ephemeral palaces are unworthy of powers whose - A portion of this essa}- appeared in tlic International R:7'iew for July-August, 1S7C. 6 THE FRENCH EXHIBITION. sovereignty 13 now uncontested , and, since universal exhibitions have taken a permanent, regular, and indispensable character, they have a right to a permanent palace. This proposition seems fair, yet how many objections can be raised against it ! The least would not be Le Palais de I Industrie, which, built for the Interna- tional Exhibition of 1855, remains useless ten months out of twelve, and only serves to shelter the annual exhibition called Le Salon. It must also be taken into account that in these fetes of progress and novelty the forms of the buildings, their structure and ar- rangements, are in themselves elements of this kind of attraction. Lastly, it will be impossible to erect a permanent palace so long as this problem is not solved: What shall be its dimensions? The surface occupied by successive great exhibitions has been, hitherto, steadily increased ; and this progression is by no means at an end. Le Palais de T Industrie of 1855, compared to our present exhibition in the Champ de Mars, is literally as a sloop by the side of a man-of-war. At every new trial it is believed that, the summit having been reached,- the decline must of necessity follow ; but each new experiment is on a larger scale than the last. To speak only of the great exhibitions held in Paris, that of 1855 covered 97,000 square metres, that of 1867 covered 153,000 square metres ; the present one, 1878, covers 280,000 square metres. It appears impossible to settle any thing on such shifting ground. As to deciding whether the exhibition should be inside or out- side of Paris, any uncertainty would only have existed in case the French capital had possessed no space large enough to allow of the vast developments intended for the new exhibition ; for the gov- ernment of the Republic had resolved to surpass 1867, and especially wished to eclipse the works of the Empire at any cost. If such a space could be found in the interior of Paris, why then tax the time and purse of Parisians, provincials, foreigners, of ourselves and our guests, in useless and expensive journeys? It was proposed to put a glass roof over the iminense court formed by a union of the Tuileries with the Louvre ; this project was, however, abandoned as insufficient. Then the commission remembered the space occupied by the preceding great exhibition (Champ de Mars, close to the Ecole Militaire and Les Invalides), and thought that a slope rising at one of its extremities, and only separated from it by the Seine, might be annexed to it. This THE FRENCH EXHIBITION. s J slope, rising like an amphitheatre, is well known to every one who has visited Paris : it is the Trocadero. According to this plan, the ground allotted to the exhibition would really consist of two different spaces, separated by the Seine : on one side the Champ de Mars, upon which would be erected the great industrial palace as in 1867; on the other side the heights of the Trocadero, which might be covered with build- ings distributed so as to produce the best effect in picturesque per- spective ; lastly, between the Champ de Mars and the Trocadero there already existed one single way of communication, a hyphen, the Bridge of Jena. But this bridge was too narrow for the crowds of people to pass. Then it must be enlarged. There was even a proposal to cover it over, and put glass cases inside it, filled with works of art, as in the famous bridge of Flor- ence, which crosses the Arno, and unites the Pitti to the Uffizi. It is about this bridge that the great battle of criticism has been fought. Certainly, as regards the accommodation of the pub- lic, it is inconvenient, since, in order to go from the Trocadero to the Champ de Mars, whatever may be the starting-point or the point to be reached, one is obliged to pass over it. This involves a little fatigue and a slight loss of time; but it may be a cause of complaint rather with workmen than with the crowds of sight-seers who enjoy a ramble about parks and gardens, and are not generally very much attached to straight or precise lines. Every thing con- sidered, these little disadvantages are more than compensated for by the proximity to the Seine and her numerous steamers, which bring and take back the greater part of the crowds from one end of Paris to the other. The shortcomings of the Exhibition of 1867 were too well re- membered and too recent not to awaken a lively preoccupation about securing adequate means of transport, upon which the com- fort or discomfort of every visitor is dependent. The powers of imagination recalled the archaeological coucoiis and antediluvian obligcantcs,^ drawn by lank, worn-out horses, hurriedly requisitioned on twenty leagues of ground around Paris; together with such masses of human beings, shaken, jolted, and bruised, who may, par- donably, have fancied themselves amongst the Alps as they were driven along the streets of our capital, or else may have firmly decided in their minds that, in Paris, carriage-building was but a * Old-fashioned French carria