E 449 
 .H84 
 Copy 2 
 
 i 
 
 A wto 
 
 7i 
 
 WE** 
 
 ^i^si 
 
 '9 
 
 
 - > * ttttol 
 
 >** 
 
 " ■&»?»*: l&i 
 
 •StLa-'- 
 
 •TV* 
 
 : J^(W*^' 
 
 >" -V ^ I. 
 
 &V^ 
 
 
 &-\ ^- 
 
 ~ , : 
 
 -?^5?^ 
 
 / -«- 
 
 KT^r» 
 
 A& 
 
 ^■r"^.- 
 
J LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, i 
 
 
 % UNITED STATED OF-AMEIflffA. J 
 
*» 
 
 / 
 
 / *i 
 
SLAVEHOLDING NOT SINFUL. 
 
 M ARGUMENT 
 
 BEFORE THE 
 
 GENERAL SYNOD 
 
 OF THE 
 
 |lcfoniuir f roMtiif gittclj €$$£$, 
 
 OCTOBER, 1855. 
 
 BY / 
 
 SAMUEL B. HOW, D.D., 
 
 PA6TOE OF THE FIBST EEFOBMED DUTCH CHTJECIT, NEW-BEUNSWICK, H. J. 
 
 NEW-YORK: 
 
 JOHN A. GRAY, PRINTER & STEREOTTPER, 
 95 & 9T CLIFF STREET. 
 
 1 8T5. 
 
Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1855, by 
 
 HENRY K. UOW, 
 
 In the Clerk'a Office of the District Court of the United States for the 
 Southern District of New- York. 
 
A RELATION 
 
 CIRCUMSTANCES THAT CALLED FORTH THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS. 
 
 The Author of the following address to the General Synod of the 
 Reformed Protestant Dutch Church of North America, deems it 
 proper to state : that at the meeting of the Synod in the City of New- 
 Brunswick in June last, " a communication was received from the 
 North-Carolina Classis of the German Reformed Church, purporting 
 to be a certified copy of their action in reference to seeking an eccle- 
 siastical connection with the Reformed Protestant Dutch Church, 
 which was referred to the Committee on Correspondence," of which 
 he was the chairman. That committee recommended to Synod the 
 adoption of the following resolution : 
 
 "Resolved, That Synod cordially reciprocate the fraternal feelings expressed by the 
 Classis of North-Carolina of the German Reformed Church ; that they regard with 
 favor their proposal of effecting an ecclesiastical relation with our Church ; and that 
 so soon as they present duly-authenticated testimonials of their accepting its stand- 
 ards and constitution, they shall be received as one of its integral parts, and so be 
 fully incorporated with it, and shall be known among us as the German Reformed 
 Classis of North-Carolina, of the Reformed Protestant Dutch Church of North- 
 America." 
 
 The Report recommending this resolution was accepted. But when 
 it was moved to adopt the above resolution, debate followed, and it 
 was discussed at some length ; when Rev. Thornton Butler, who had 
 been recognized by Synod as the Commissioner from the North- 
 Carolina Classis, perceiving from the debate that several members of 
 the Synod were opposed to forming a connection with them, with- 
 drew the application of the Classis. He was afterwards requested, 
 
4 ADDRESS. 
 
 by a resolution of the Synod, to "reconsider the withdrawal of his 
 papers, and leave them in the hands of the Synod until their meeting 
 in October next : whereupon he consented to leave them in the hands 
 of the Synod, subject to the advice of his Chassis." According to the 
 report of the New-York Tribune, of June 16, 1855, there were two 
 principal objections raised against the receiving of the Classis by the 
 Synod ; the one was, that it was inexpedient to do so, because it 
 would endanger the peace of the Church, and expose it to being dis- 
 tracted by the agitation of the question of slavery. This was urged 
 by Rev. Dr. Wyckoff, of Albany, and Rev. Dr. Bethune, of Brook- 
 lyn. The other was, that slaveholding is a sin, and that we ought not 
 to hold communion with slaveholders. This objection was urged by 
 Rev. Isaac G. Duryee, of Schenectady, who said, that he had " conscien- 
 tious scruples against the formation of such a relation." According to 
 the Tribune, he declared as follows : "I can say that my inmost soul 
 shrinks from the idea .of our extending the fellowship of our church to 
 slaveholding churches as I shrink from the touch of the torpedo," etc., 
 etc. The writer of this was not aware at the time that there were any 
 Abolitionists among the ministers of the Reformed Dutch Church, or 
 that such feelings as those expressed by Rev. Mr. Duryee existed in 
 the minds of any members of the Synod. He knew that slavery 
 had existed in the Reformed Dutch Church for generations past, and 
 that it now exists ; and that there is no prohibition of it in the form 
 of our church-government, and that it had never been reproved by 
 General Synod. He was, therefore, taken completely by surprise. 
 He, however, attempted a reply, and among other things, reminded 
 the Synod that, as a judicatory of the Church of Christ, they were 
 bound to administer its government according to the laws and the 
 principles taught us in God's holy word ; and that, as there was no 
 prohibition of the holding of slaves, and nothing whatever in that holy 
 word to warrant our refusal to form an ecclesiastical connection with 
 these German brethren, we ought to assent to their proposal by 
 receiving and incorporating them with our Church. 
 
 At the late meeting of Synod in October, in the city of New-York, 
 the question of receiving this Classis was again considered. On the 
 third day of the session of Synod, a motion was made and carried in 
 the affirmative to lay the whole subject upon the table ; the vote at 
 first standing 44 ayes and 41 nays. The ayes and nays were called 
 for, and the vote then resulted in 50 ayes and 47 noes. The Comis- 
 sioner from the Classis of North-Carolina considered this vote as 
 dearly exhibiting the feelings of a majority of the Synod towards the 
 Classis, and withdrew from its sessions. He also expressed to the 
 
ADDRESS. 5 
 
 Chairman of the Committee of Correspondence his desire that he 
 would do nothing more in relation to this business, and received from 
 him the assurance that he would comply with his request. When, 
 therefore, on the following day, this matter was called up, he stated 
 to the Synod, that he considered the vote on the motion to lay this 
 whole subject on the table as decisive, and that he had promised the 
 Commissioner from North-Carolina that he would take no further part 
 in any doings of the Synod on this question. The following resolution 
 was finally adopted : 
 
 " Whereas, It is evident from the opinions expressed on this floor, that the Synod 
 can not unite cordially in receiving the Classis of North-Carolina within the limits 
 of our Church ; and whereas the Synod desire to treat the Classis of North-Caro- 
 Jina with the courtesy and kindness due to respected brethren, therefore 
 
 "Resolved, That the Commissioner of the Classis of North-Carolina be requested to 
 withdraw his papers." 
 
 On the second day of the sessions of Synod, it being the order of 
 the day to take this subject up, the Chairman of the Committee on 
 Correspondence delivered, with the exception of a few passages which 
 he omitted when speaking before the Synod, the following 
 
 A. D D R E S S . 
 
 Me. President : Two principal objections have been made 
 against receiving into our Church the Classis of North-Carolina. 
 The first objection is, that if we do so, we shall destroy the 
 peace of our Church, and introduce among ourselves distrac- 
 tion and division by the agitation of the slavery question. The 
 second objection is, that slaveholding is a sin, and that there- 
 fore, we ought not to admit slaveholders into our Church. 1 
 shall attempt, first of all, to show that slaveholding is not a sin, 
 and that therefore, there is no reason to exclude slaveholders, 
 simply because they are slaveholders, from union and com- 
 munion with our Church. If this is established, then both ob- 
 jections necessarily fail: for it would be alike absurd and 
 wicked to disturb the peace of the Church for that which the 
 Scriptures teach us is not a sin, and which was no bar to 
 church-fellowship with the Apostles of Christ. Let it be re- 
 
6 ADDRESS. 
 
 marked that we admit slavery is an evil, much to be lamented ; 
 but we deny that it is, as 1ms been asserted, a sin against God 
 and a crime against man. 
 
 I. THE HOLDING OF A SLAVE NOT A SIN. 
 
 It has been said that " American Slavery is at war with the 
 Declaration of Independence, the Constitution of the United 
 States, natural justice, and Christianity" — "that slavery is a 
 sin against God and a crime against man, etc."* To these bold 
 statements we reply, that the mass of the American people have 
 never considered the holding of slaves as at war with the De- 
 claration of Independence ; that the Supreme Court of the Na- 
 tion has declared that it is not against the Constitution of the 
 United States ; and that it is not against natural justice and 
 Christianity, we shall now endeavor to prove. AVe admit that 
 it is an evil much to be lamented, but we deny that it is a sin 
 against God and a crime against man. 
 
 As I am addressing the Supreme Ecclesiastical Court of the 
 Reformed Protestant Dutch Church, my final appeal shall be 
 to the Holy Scriptures as the inspired word of God, the only 
 infallible and perfect rule of right and wrong, truth and error, 
 in matters of religious faith and duty. ~We all profess to believe 
 that " the law and the testimony of God" are the standard of 
 duty and the rule of faith, and that if any "speak not accord- 
 ing to this word, it is because there is no light in them." 
 
 That the holding of slaves is not a sin we prove from the 
 following passages of Scripture : 
 
 1. 1 Tim. G : 1-5 : " Let as many servants as are under 
 the yoke count their own masters worthy of all honor, that the 
 name of God and his doctrine be not blasphemed. And they 
 that have believing masters, let them not despise them, because 
 they are brethren ; but rather do them service, because they 
 are faithful and beloved, partakers of the benefit. These things 
 teach and exhort. If any man teach otherwise, and consent 
 not to wholesome words, even the words of our Lord Jesus 
 Christ, and to the doctrine wliich is according to godliness; he 
 is proud, knowing nothing, but doting about questions and 
 
 * Sco 13th Annual Report of the American and Foreign Anti-Slavery Society, 
 pp. 3 and 16. 
 
THE HOLDING OF A SLAVE NOT A SIN. / 
 
 strifes of words, whereof comet] 1 envy, strife, railings, evil sur- 
 rnisings, perverse clisputings of men of corrupt minds, and desti- 
 tute of the truth, supposing that gain is godliness : from such 
 withdraw thyself." 
 
 We begin with the New Testament to obviate an objection 
 that might be urged if we should begin with the Old Testa- 
 ment, that the Christian dispensation has greater light and 
 freedom and privileges than were enjoyed under the Jewish 
 dispensation, and that therefore, though slavery might have 
 lawfully existed under the latter, that can not be pleaded in 
 favor of its existing under the former. Our endeavor will be 
 to show that they both entirely agree on the point before us. 
 
 The term " servants" in this passage of sacred Scripture is in 
 the original Greek, "dovXoi" the primary meaning of which, 
 Robinson in his Greek and English Lexicon of the ]STew Testa- 
 ment, gives as, " a bondman, slave, servant, pr. by birth ; diff. 
 from dvdpdnodov, one enslaved in war." — He says : "In a family 
 the dovXog was one hound to serve, a slave, and was the prop- 
 erty of his master, 'a living possession,' as Aristotle calls 
 him." — Schleusner gives as the meaning of the term — 1. proprie : 
 servus, minister, homo non liber, nee sui juris et opponitur ru> 
 eXevdepog, that is, " its first and proper signification is that of a 
 slave, a serving-man, a man who is not free and at his own dis- 
 posal." But to put his meaning beyond doubt, the Apostle adds 
 the words, " under the yoke" which is an emblem of servitude 
 or of the rule to which any one is subject. He here unques- 
 tionably speaks of slaves who are under bondage to their mas- 
 ters. Bloomfield says : " The commentators are not sufficiently 
 aware of the strength of this expression, in which there is a 
 blending of two expressions to put the case in its strongest 
 point of view (supposing even the harshest bondage) in order 
 to make the inj unction to obedience the more forcible." These 
 slaves the Apostle commands to " count their own masters, 
 whether heathen or Christians or Jews, worthy of all honor," 
 and the reason that he gives for this is, " that the name of God 
 and his doctrine be not blasphemed." It was lawful by the law 
 of Moses, to make of the heathen bondmen for life, and to hold 
 their children in bondage. But not so with one who was born a 
 Jew. lie was permitted to serve only for six years, and it is quite 
 possible that there were some false teachers who asserted that, 
 
8 ADDRESS. 
 
 as no Jew was to remain a slave for life, so ought no Christ- 
 ian. 
 
 This sentiment,. if it Lad prevailed among those slaves who 
 were Christians, would have caused them to despise and hate their 
 masters, and to withhold from them the respect and obedience 
 which they owed to them. They would thus bring a reproach 
 on the Gospel as if it were a doctrine that taught men contempt 
 for their superiors, and disobedience to their lawful commands. 
 From speaking of the duty which slaves owe to their masters 
 in general, the Apostle passes on to speak to those who have 
 believing masters who are their brethren in Christ. Here the 
 questions whether the holding of slaves is a sin, and whether 
 we should hold Christian communion with slaveholders, are 
 fairly met. Does the Apostle then teach the slaves that 
 they ought to be free? that their Christian masters sin in hold- 
 ing them in bondage? and does he, with apostolic authority 
 and in the name of Jesus Christ, command the masters to give 
 them their freedom? He does nothing of the kind. He not 
 only does not require these Christian masters to set their slaves 
 at liberty, but he speaks of them as " faithful and beloved" 
 brethren, " partakers of the benefit," and for this very reason 
 he exhorts Christian slaves not to despise them, but rather to do 
 them service. It seems impossible for the question before us 
 to be more fully and directly settled. But the Apostle proceeds 
 further. He says that " if any man teach otherwise," that is, if 
 there is any Abolitionist among you, any Immediate Emanci- 
 pationist, who says that no Christian can, without sin, hold a 
 slave ; that if he holds any, he is bound in duty immediatply to 
 liberate them, and if he docs not, then true Christians are bound 
 to refuse church-fellowship and communion with him lest they 
 should partake of his sin — if ;my man teach these things, then 
 he does " not consent to wholesome words, even the words of 
 onr Lord Jesus Christ, and to the doctrine which is according 
 to godliness." This we should suppose would have been a 
 sufficient rebuke. But to show the criminality of the doctrine 
 of these early Abolitionists in the Christian church, the Apostle 
 proceeds to say, that he who teaches their doctrine " is proud, 
 knowing nothing, but doting about questions and strifes of 
 words, whereof cometh envy, strife, railings, evil surmisings, 
 perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds, and destitute of 
 
THE HOLDING OF A SLAVE NOT A SIN. 9 
 
 the truth, supposing that gain is godliness." He, then, in a 
 most marked manner, shows the falseness and danger of their 
 sentiments by commanding Timothy, " from such withdraw 
 thyself," that is, hold no intercourse with them. We shall not 
 inquire how far this precept extends, nor whether it is a pro- 
 hibition against holding church communion with Abolitionists ; 
 nor whether the Apostle does not mean to teach us that their 
 sentiments are so revolutionary, so subversive of the established 
 order of society, so calculated to produce discontent and resent- 
 ment in the minds of the slaves as to endanger not only public 
 but domestic peace and safety, and to produce by stirring up 
 the slaves to insurrection, massacres and horrors, like those of 
 the Massacres of St. Domingo, in the year 1790. Certain it 
 is, that he commands us to withdraw from them. 
 
 2. We now turn to the Old Testament. We are informed, 
 Gen. 17 : 1-14, that when Abrain was ninety years old and 
 nine, the Lord again ratified the Covenant which he had 
 made with him, and instituted circumcision as the sacramental 
 sign of the Covenant. He commanded : " He that is eight days 
 old among you, every man-child, in your generations — he that 
 is born in thy house, and he that is bought with thy money, 
 must needs be circumcised." (Y. 12, 13.) " He that is bought 
 with thy money," means the bought slave, and to such God 
 commanded the sign of his covenant to be administered. 
 Here then God took Abraham, a slaveholder, his children and 
 his bought slaves into covenant with himself without express- 
 ing the slightest disapprobation of his holding slaves, but in 
 the fullest manner authorizing him to retain them as a portion 
 of his family or household by taking him and them into coven- 
 ant with him. Abraham was a large slaveholder, for we are 
 told, Gen. 14 : 14, 15, that he armed three hunded and eight- 
 een of his slaves to pursue the kings who had captured Lot ; 
 and the servant whom he commissioned to procure a wife for 
 Isaac, in recounting to the family of Eebecca the great wealth 
 of Abraham said: "The Lord hath blessed my master greatly, 
 and he is become great ; and he hath given him flocks and 
 herds, and silver and gold, and men-servants and maid-ser- 
 vants, and camels and asses." (Gen. 24 : 35.) Here men-servants 
 —the original term means servants who are bought, or inherit- 
 ed slaves— such men-servants and maid-servants are enumer- 
 
10 ADDRESS. 
 
 ated aa a part of the property belonging to Abraham— property 
 which the Lord hath given him — and in the bestowal of which 
 the Lord had blessed him, and the possession of which Abra- 
 ham's servant urged as a reason for Rebecca marrying his son. 
 
 But what is the character that is given to Abraham? The 
 Apostle James tells us that this slaveholding Abraham "was 
 called ifu friend of Goo 1 :' (Jas. 2 : 23.) The Apostle Paul 
 teaches us that he was "the father of all them that believe." 
 ( I J< »m. 4 : 11.) In the parable of the rich man and Lazarus, to 
 teach us the wonderful change that death made in the con- 
 dition of the poor beggar, Christ tells us that "he was carried 
 by the angels into Abraham's bosom." (Luke 16 : 22.) 
 
 The Covenant which we are considering, was made with Abra- 
 ham and with his children that should come after him in their 
 generations, for an everlasting Covenant. It was by this cove- 
 nant that God first organized his visible Church on earth. He 
 and his descendants were now separated from the world by God 
 himself, and were taken into a special covenant-relation with 
 him. The promise given was : " I will be a God unto thee 
 and to thy seed after thee," and as the sign and the seal of this 
 Covenant, circumcision was instituted ; and thenceforth the 
 descendants of Abraham, through Isaac and Jacob, became 
 " an holy people unto the Lord their God ;" and the Lord chose 
 them to be a peculiar people to himself above all nations 
 that were upon the earth. (Deut. 14 : 2.) A special promise 
 given to Abraham was : " In thy seed shall all the nations of 
 the earth be blessed." This promised seed was Christ. Because 
 of the rejection of Christ by the Jews, the natural descendants 
 of Abraham, they became an apostate church, and the kingdom 
 of God was taken away from them and given to a nation or a 
 race of men bringing forth the fruits thereof. They ceased to 
 be the peculiar people of God, and thenceforth the middle wall 
 of partition, the ceremonial law that sej^arated the Jew from 
 the Gentile, was broken down by Christ ; and believing Gentiles 
 were admitted into the Church along with believing Jews. The 
 covenant, however, w r as the same, and through Christ the 
 blessing of Abraham conies on the Gentiles, for they are all 
 the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus, and so they are. 
 Abraham's seed and heirs according to the promise. Circum- 
 cision taught the Jew to look forward by faith to a coming 
 
THE HOLDING OF A SLAVE NOT A SIN. 11 
 
 Messiah to save him from sin and make him a child of God. 
 Baptism teaches all believers in Christ to look back and rejoice 
 that the promised seed of Abraham, from whom he receives the 
 blessings of salvation, has come. Circumcision now on the 
 part of the Jews is the standing testimony against them that 
 they reject Christ, and so are rejected by him. Baptism is the 
 standing testimony that we believe in Christ as the seed of 
 Abraham, in whom it was promised that all nations should be 
 blessed. Before the coming of Christ, circumcision, and since 
 his coming, baptism distinguish from the world the organized 
 visible Church of God, which has existed from the institution of 
 circumcision, and will exist till the end of time. But this cov- 
 enant was made with a slaveholder, and this visible Church 
 was organized in his family, and his slaves received the sign of 
 the covenant along with himself and his children. 
 
 Moreover, the non-holding of slaves has never been made a 
 term or condition of church- fellowship. Bingham, in his Anti- 
 quities of the Christian Church, informs us that, " We find by the 
 author of the Constitutions, under the name of the Apostles,* that 
 in the first ages of the Christian Church, one part of the inquiry 
 that was made concerning those who offered themselves to 
 baptism was, whether they were slaves or freemen. If they 
 were slaves to a heathen, they were only taught their obliga- 
 tions to please their master, that the word of God might not be 
 blasphemed ; and the master had no further concern in their 
 baptism, as being himself an inlidel ; but if the master were a 
 Christian, then the testimony of the master was first to be re- 
 quired concerning the life and conversation of his slave before 
 he could be admitted to the privilege of baptism. If he gave 
 a laudable account of him he was received ; if otherwise, he was 
 rejected till he approved himself to his master. So far in those 
 days it was thought necessary and serviceable to religion to 
 grant Christian masters a power over their slaves, that without 
 their testimony and approbation they could not be accepted as 
 fit candidates for baptism."f So far, too, we may add, were 
 they from considering the holding of slaves to be sinful in 
 itself. 
 
 * Supposed to be of the second and third centuries. 
 
 f Book 11th, chap. 5, sec. 4, p. 502. See also Southern Presbyterian Review, 
 Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 582-583. 
 
12 ADDRESS. 
 
 3. Our third argument to prove that the holding of slaves 
 is not sinful, is derived from Exocl. 20 : 17. "Thou shalt not 
 covet thy neighbor's house ; thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's 
 wile, nor his man-servant, nor his maid-servant, nor his ox, nor 
 his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbor's." This precept 
 establishes the right of property, and forbids not only the unjust 
 depriving the owner of his lawful property, but even the secret 
 desire to do so. It strikes down at once into the dust Commun- 
 ism and Socialism. It teaches us that there is a division, and that 
 there are rights of property ; that there are masters and that 
 there are slaves, and bids us to respect the right of the master, 
 and not to covet his man-servant or his maid-servant. 
 
 The division of property and the security of the owner in the 
 possession of it, lie at the foundation of civilized and Christian 
 life, and where they are unknown men are wandering tribes of 
 barbarians, ignorant, rapacious, and debased. To cultivate the 
 arts and sciences that embellish and exalt human life, and es- 
 pecially to have colleges and churches, the right of property 
 must be respected, and the desire and the attempt to deprive 
 others of property which the law of God and the law of the 
 land have made it lawful for them to hold, is to strike a blow 
 at the very existence of civilization and Christianity. We ad- 
 mit that there are great inequalities in the possession of pro- 
 perty and in the conditions of men, and that there are many evils 
 to be deplored. But with all their inequalities and evils, the 
 worst despotism on earth is to be preferred to a state of constant 
 anarchy and consequently of constant warfare. Oppressive as 
 despotism may be, yet under it the masses of men live in com- 
 parative quiet and security. Under anarchy no man is safe in 
 the possession of life or property. God therefore commands us 
 to respect the right of property, to leave the lawful owner of it 
 in the undisturbed possession of it, even though it be a man- 
 servant or a maid-servant. What though we may think slavery 
 unjust, yet there it is, it actually exists, for wise and good rea- 
 sons God permits it, and he commands us not to seek by force 
 to remove it. He has sent forth no messengers of violence and 
 of war, no spiritual knight-erraats to light with carnal weapons, 
 and by force and bloodshed to remove the evils and oppressions 
 that exist, or that we may imagine to exist among men. This was 
 the plan of Mohammed, who went forth with sword and fire to 
 
THE HOLDING OP A SLAVE NOT A SIN. 13 
 
 punish and destroy all who did not agree with him in what he 
 considered truth and right. This was the plan of the French infi- 
 del propagandists of 1793 ; and this we fear is the plan of many 
 amongst us, and we regret to say of some who are called min- 
 isters of the Gospel, a name which they do not deserve and should 
 not bear. No, " the weapons of our warfare, not carnal, but 
 mighty through God to the pulling down of strong-holds." We 
 are ministers of peace, not of war, and they who would put 
 down what they consider wrong among us by violence and war, 
 might have made good followers of Mohammed and able allies 
 to French infidel republicans ; but we can not admit their claim 
 to be the ministers of the Gospel of the Prince of Peace. 
 
 4. Our fourth argument to prove that slavery is not sinful, 
 is derived from the ceremonial and political law given to the 
 Israelites by God, as well as the moral law. One of the most 
 remarkable of the institutions of the Levitical law, was the 
 passover which commemorated the deliverance of the Israelites 
 from their bondage in Egypt. "We are told that the Lord said 
 to Moses and Aaron : " This is the ordinance of the passover ; 
 there shall no stranger eat thereof. But every man's servant 
 that is bought for money, when thou hast circumcised him, 
 then shall he eat thereof. A foreigner and an hired servant 
 shall not eat thereof." When the bought servant was circum- 
 cised he became a member of his master's family, and was 
 entitled to various privileges which were not granted to the 
 foreigner who was a hired servant. He became one of the 
 covenant people of God, for his circumcision signified this to 
 him ; and if he was an Israelite indeed, then it was to him, as 
 well as to Abraham, " a seal of the righteousness of faith." 
 
 Another remarkable law was that of the Jubilee, which re- 
 turned every fiftieth year, when every Hebrew servant was set 
 free with his children, and was restored to his own family and 
 the possessions of his father. But it was not so with servants 
 who were foreigners. The law in relation to them was as fol- 
 lows : " Both thy bond-men and thy bond-maids which thou 
 shalt have, shall be of the heathen that are round about you ; 
 of them shall ye buy bond-men and bond-maids. Moreover, 
 of the children of the strangers that do sojourn among you, of 
 them shall ye buy and of their families that are with you which 
 they begat in your land, and they shall be your possession ; and 
 
14 ADDRESS. 
 
 yc shall take them as an inheritance for your children after 3*011 
 to inherit them for a possession. They shall be your bond-men 
 •for ever." (Lev. 25 : 44—46.) It is remarkable that this law was 
 given within the space of the first year after the departure of 
 the Israelites out of Egypt." But in all the history of their de- 
 liverance from the cruel bondage in which they were there 
 held, no mention is made of any slaves among them ; nor when 
 we consider their abject poverty is it probable that they pos- 
 sessed any. It seems probable, therefore, that the laws relating 
 to slaveholding were given to them in anticipation of the ex- 
 istence of slavery among them after they were settled in the 
 land of Canaan ; and if so, they were plainly permitted by God 
 to hold slaves. When Abraham was taken into covenant by 
 God, the holding of slaves was fully established, and had he 
 even wished and attempted to do away with it, we have no 
 reason to suppose that he would have succeeded, but would 
 have exposed himself and his family to the resentment of those 
 among whom he dwelt, and that therefore God permitted him 
 to hold slaves. But this can not be said of the laws in relation 
 to slavery which were given to the Israelites. They were then 
 separated from all other nations, alone and in the wilderness, 
 they were under the special protection of God and had nothing 
 to fear from any of the neighboring nations. But instead of for- 
 bidding them to hold slaves, he expressly permitted them to do 
 so. We might produce other arguments from the laws given 
 by Moses to the Israelites ; but we think that enough has been 
 presented to show that the holding of slaves was not forbidden 
 by God, and was no bar to the enjoying of church privileges. 
 
 It may be objected, however, that under the Old-Testament 
 dispensation many things were permitted which are not tole- 
 rated under the New-Testament dispensation, a dispensation of 
 greater light and purity and privileges than belonged to the 
 old dispensation. Let us then examine the New Testament 
 and inquire what are its teachings on this subject. 
 
 1. Our first remark is, that Christ and his Apostles in the 
 strongest manner assert the divine inspiration and binding 
 authority of Moses and the Prophets, that is, of the Old-Testa- 
 ment Scriptures. On this point there was no dispute between 
 them and the Jews. It was Jesus Christ the Son of God who 
 
 * Compare Exodus 19 : 1, with Num. 10 : 11. 
 
THE HOLDING- OF A SLAVE NOT A SIN. 15 
 
 gave to the Israelites their laws in the wilderness, and who 
 spake by his spirit in the prophets,* who was again visibly 
 present among the Jews in the humble form of the Man of 
 Nazareth, explaining and enforcing the laws which he had 
 before given to them. The Law of Ten Commandments is re- 
 ferred to and argued from by both Christ and his Apostles, as 
 the Law of God of universal and perpetual obligation, and con- 
 sequently the tenth command is in as full force at the present 
 day as when it was first given, and the right of the master to 
 his man-servant and maid-servant remains as strong as at the 
 first. Moreover, all true believers in Christ are children of 
 Abraham, and so under and interested in the Covenant which 
 God made with him. " Know ye, therefore," says the Apostle, 
 " that they which are of faith the same are the children of Abra- 
 ham So then they which be of faith are blessed 
 
 with faithful Abraham. . . . If ye be Christ's then are ye 
 Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise. (Gal. 3 : 7, 
 9, 29.) It is under that covenant which God made with Abra- 
 ham to be a God to him and to his seed after him, and of which 
 circumcision, before the death of Christ, was the sign, and bap- 
 tism now is and has been since his death, that the visible 
 Church is now placed, and believing masters with their believ- 
 ing slaves are now as they ever have been entitled to the sign 
 and privileges of the covenant. 
 
 2. Our Lord repeatedly spoke of slaves, especially in several 
 of his parables, without the slightest intimation that he con- 
 demned slavery, and in such a way as plainly showed that he 
 considered it lawful. Among others we refer to the parable 
 of the Unmerciful Servant, Matt. 18 : 23-35. Of the Talents, 
 Matt. 25 : 11-30. Of the Unprofitable Servants, Luke 
 17 : 7, 10. 
 
 3. We are told, Matt. 8 : 5-13, that a Centurion came to 
 Jesus beseeching him to heal his sick servant. When Jesus 
 offered to come and heal him, the centurion replied : "Lord, I 
 am not worthy that thou shouldest come under my roof: but 
 speak the word only, and my servant shall be healed. For I 
 am a man under authority, having soldiers under me : and I 
 say to this man, Go, and he goeth ; and to another, Come, and he 
 
 * Luke 24 : 21. Acts 24 : 14, etc. 
 
16 ADDRESS. 
 
 cometh ; and to my servant, (slave, tfovAw,) Do this, and lie doeth 
 it." Here was a heathen, high in office, acknowledging to 
 Christ that he was a slaveholder, and asking of him to heal his 
 servant. If the holding of slaves had been sinful, Jesus would, 
 we 1 1< >ubt not, have so informed him. Instead of this he highly 
 commended his faith. lie marvelled and said to them that 
 followed, Yerily I say unto you, I have not found so great faith, 
 no, not in Israel. Did he say that a slaveholder could not be 
 a Christian ? that he could not be saved ? that he would not 
 own him as his disciple? lie said just the reverse. "I say 
 unto you that many shall come from the east and west and 
 shall sit down with Abraham and Isaac and Jacob in the kin<r- 
 dom of heaven," plainly intimating that this believing Roman 
 centurion should be one of them. 
 
 The divinely-inspired writers of the Books of the New Testa- 
 ment imitate their Master, for while they address commands, 
 exhortations, and admonitions to masters and slaves, they do 
 not give the slightest intimation that slaveholding is sinful. 
 We shall select some of the passages which refer to this subject : 
 
 Eph. G : 5-8. — Servants, be obedient unto them that are your masters ac- 
 cording to the flesh, with fear and trembling, in singleness of your heart as unto 
 Christ ; not with eyeservice as menpleasers, but as the servants of Christ, doing 
 the will of God from the heart; with good will doing service, as to the Lord 
 and not to men : knowing that whatsoever good thing any man doeth, the same 
 shall he receive of the Lord, whether he be bond or free. 
 
 Coloss. ;J : 22-25. — Servants, obey in all things your masters according to 
 the flesh, not with eyeservice as menpleasers ; but in singleness of heart, 
 fearing God : and whatsoever ye do, do it heartily, as to the Lord, and not 
 onto linn ; knowing that of the Lord ye shall receive the reward of the inherit- 
 ance : for ye serve the Lord Christ. Rut he that doeth wrong shall receive for 
 the wrong which he hath done : and there is no respect of persons. 
 
 Thus 2 -. 9, 10. — Exhort servants to be obedient to their own masters, and to 
 please them in all things; not answering again; not purloining, but showing 
 all good fidelity; that they may adorn the doctrine of God our Saviour in all 
 things. 
 
 1 Peter 2 : 18-21. — Servants, be subject to your masters with all fear; not 
 Only to the good and gentle, lint also to the fro ward. For this is thankworthy, 
 if a man for conscience toward God endure grief, suffering wrongfully. For 
 what glory is it, if, -when ye be buffeted m your faults, ye shall take it patiently? 
 but if, when ye do well, and suffer for it, ye take it patiently, this is acceptable 
 with God. For even hereunto were ye called.* 
 
 The Apostles fully recognize the right of the masters in their 
 
 ations from the Epistles of the Apostle Paul, he uses the 
 lot, bond Blaves— the A.postle Peter uses the term di/cerai, which also some- 
 tunes means slaves. See Luke 1G : 13. 
 
THE HOLDING OF A SLAVE NOT A SIN. 17 
 
 servants, and to their obedience and service, and exhort the 
 servants to yield these to their masters, as their duty and for 
 conscience toward God. 
 
 "We think that we have fully established from Scripture our 
 position, that the holding of slaves is not a sin. We might in- 
 deed have pursued a shorter course, and have challenged the 
 Abolitionists to produce a single law of God forbidding it. We 
 are told that " whosoever committeth sin transgresseth the law, 
 for sin is the transgression of the law /" (1 John 3 : 4,) and that 
 "sin is not imputed when there is no law." (Rom. 5:13.) 
 Slavery is constantly spoken of in the sacred Scriptures, but 
 there is no direct prohibition of it, no special law against it, and 
 therefore it does not come under the definition of sin given by 
 the inspired apostle. We can not therefore but consider the 
 harsh and bitter denunciations of slaveholders as both unwar- 
 ranted and anti-scriptural. 
 
 Before leaving this part of our subject, we think it right to 
 refer to two cases of fugitive slaves. The one is that of Onesi- 
 mus, who ran away from his master, Philemon, who was a 
 Christian, and had been converted through the ministry of Paul. 
 Though a slaveholder, the Apostle commends him for his love 
 and faith toward the Lord Jesus and toward all saints. Onesi- 
 mus, his fugitive slave, came to Pome, and was there converted 
 also under the ministry of Paul, and had, by his exemplary 
 temper and conduct, gained his high esteem. How does Paul act 
 under these circumstances % He was an inspired apostle, in- 
 vested with authority from Christ to teach Christian doctrines 
 and to enforce Christian duties, and therefore his conduct in this 
 case would be a precedent to guide the Church in all future 
 similar cases. He explicitly and fully recognized the right of 
 Philemon, and sent back his slave, at the Scime time earnestly 
 commending him to the mercy and forgiveness and Christian 
 love of his master. 
 
 Another strong test-case is that of Hagar, the fugitive slave 
 of Abraham. She had fled from the oppression of her mistress, 
 Sarah. The angel of the Lord — or rather, as we think the 
 words should be translated, the Angel-Jehovah — found her in 
 the wilderness, and said, " Hagar, $arai's maid, whence earnest 
 thou ? and whither wilt thou go ? And she said, I flee from the 
 face of my mistress Sarai. And the angel of the Lord said 
 2 
 
18 ADDRESS. 
 
 unto lier, Return to thy mistress, and submit thyself under her 
 hands." (Gen. 16 : 6-9.) Here the Lord Jehovah taught Iia- 
 o-ar her duty as a slave, to submit to and obey her mistress, and 
 recognized the right of masters to their slaves. 
 
 "We have thus far considered only the question whether slave- 
 ry is a sin, and have shown that Abraham was a slaveholder 
 when the Lord called and entered into covenant with him ; that 
 at the first organization of the visible Church of God, slaves and 
 their children were admitted into it along with their masters, 
 and that the sign of the covenant was equally administered to 
 both ; that the laws which God gave to the Israelites by Moses 
 clearly recognized the right of masters in their slaves and to 
 their service ; that Christ and his apostles enforced these laws ; 
 that under the Gospel dispensation slaveholders and their 
 slaves were admitted to church-membership and its privileges ; 
 that special commands were given to regulate the intercourse 
 between masters and their slaves ; and that the apostle Paul, 
 and even the Angel- Jehovah himself, sent back to their owners 
 slaves who had run away from them. It is evident from this 
 that God has not made the holding of slaves a sin, and that to 
 attempt to exclude all slaveholders, simply as and because they 
 are such, from church communion, is a usurpation of unlawful 
 power against the covenant and the law of God. We have 
 made our appeal to the Scriptures of truth, heartily assenting to 
 the teachings of the confession of faith of our Church, which 
 says : " "We believe in the sufficiency of the Holy Scriptures to 
 be the only rule of faith. "We believe that those Holy Scrip- 
 tures fully contain the word of God, and that whatsoever man 
 ought to believe unto salvation is sufficiently taught therein. 
 Therefore we reject with all our hearts whatso- 
 ever doth not agree with this infallible rule which the apostles 
 have taught us, saying,' Try the spirits, whether they are of God. 
 Likewise, ' If there come any unto you, and bring not this doc- 
 trine, receive him not into your house.' " (Art. 1, § 7.) 
 
 II. KTCASONS FOE, THE PERMISSION OF SLAVERY. 
 
 Since God has permitted slavery to exist in his Church, and 
 has made it the subject of special legislation, there must be not 
 only sufficient, but good and wise reasons for his so doing. 
 
EEASONS FOR THE PERMISSION OF SLAVERY. 1 !) 
 
 Should we be unable to discover these reasons, it would be our 
 duty to bow in humble acquiescence, assured that he ever acts 
 with infinite wisdom and goodness. 
 
 But there are most important reasons for what He has done, 
 some of which we shall now attempt to specify. Slavery is one 
 of the bitter effects of the fall, and of the great wickedness of 
 men. The only effectual remedy for these evils, is the redemp- 
 tion of men from sin by our Lord Jesus Christ; and this 
 redemption is applied to them through the instrumentality of 
 the word, and of the ministers of God which he has given to 
 the Church. 
 
 At the very time when God pronounced on man the sentence 
 of death, immediately after his first sin, he said to the Serpent: 
 " I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between 
 thy seed and her seed : it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt 
 bruise his heel." It is here foretold that there would be con- 
 stant enmity through the whole period of the power of " that 
 old Serpent, called the Devil and Satan, which deceiveth the 
 whole world," (Rev. 12:9;) together with wicked men, whom 
 he rules, and who are called " the children of the devil," 
 (1 John 3 : 10,) and the Lord Jesus Christ, the seed of the 
 woman. It is foretold, that in this contest the seed of the 
 woman should bruise the serpent's head, that it should inflict a 
 mortal blow on his power ; and that the serpent should bruise 
 his heel, that it should injure his human nature, in which he 
 dwelt and trod upon the earth. This was accomplished, when 
 Christ " through death destroyed him that had the power of 
 death, that is, the devil, and delivered them who through fear of 
 death were all their lifetime subject to bondage." (Ileb. 2 : 14, 
 15.) This promise gave the first gleam of light and hope to 
 our fallen race. All the cruelties and oppressions and deaths 
 that have ever existed among men, have been caused by their 
 apostasy from God, and the delusions and temptations of the 
 devil. The remedy for all this is the redemption that is in 
 Christ Jesus. This is the remedy that God has provided, and 
 there is no other. The universal extension of the Gospel of 
 Christ, in its purity and power, over the whole world, is that 
 which alone can remove the evils of the fall. 
 
 This truth was more fully revealed when God gave to Abra- 
 ham the promise : " In thy seed shall all the nations of the earth 
 
ADDRESS. 
 
 be blessed.' 1 The exposition of this promise is given to us by 
 
 tie, when he says: '-Now to Abraham and his seed 
 
 the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of 
 
 many ; bu1 as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ." He 
 
 : " Christ hath redeemed ns from the curse of the Law, 
 
 being made a curse for us. . . . That the blessing of Abraham 
 
 might come on the Gentiles through Jesus Christ, that we 
 
 might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith." (Gal. 
 
 : 1 : 16, 13, 14.) This 1 (leasing of Abraham, God communicates to 
 
 the world through the Church, and a clear understanding of 
 
 the origin, the nature, the privileges, and the design of the 
 
 visible Church, which began in the family of Abraham, will 
 
 greatly assist us to form right conclusions on the subject of 
 
 slavery. 
 
 It had its origin at a time when the world was full of 
 idolatry and wickedness, and seemed to be fast hastening to 
 the same state of violence and crime as existed before the 
 flood. Then, God interposed in wrath, and, with the exception 
 of Noah and his family, destroyed the whole race for their sins. 
 Now, however, he interposed in mercy, not to destroy, but to 
 reform the race. To arrest the wickedness that was spreading 
 in all directions, and prevent its universal prevalence, he called 
 Abraham, and entered into covenant with him. He appointed 
 circumcision, as its sign and seal that he would be a God to 
 him and to his seed after him; and he commanded him to 
 administer this sign and seal of the covenant— not to the serv- 
 ants that ho had hired, but to him that is " bought with money of 
 any stranger which is not of thy seed." (Gen. 17:12.) Does 
 the Abolitionist burn with indignation against the wickedness 
 of slaveholders, and of those who do not join in his wrath and 
 denunciations against them; Does he cry: "Let justice be 
 done though the heavens fall?" Let him look back and see 
 this justice done in the terrible desolations of the flood. But did 
 this reform man \ It is easy to declaim against popular evils and 
 popular Bins to which we ourselves have no personal tempta- 
 - ; but it may be laid down as a sure maxim, that the man 
 who does not resist and repel the temptations to which he is 
 personally exposed ; who declaims against the sins of others 
 vv ith whom he has no personal connection, and from whom he 
 has no reason to fear personal evil, or expect personal profit, 
 
EEASONS FOR THE PERMISSION OF SLAVERY. 21 
 
 while he readily complies with whatever is popular in the 
 Church or the world, and is ready, and even foremost, to extol 
 whatever the community among whom he lives extols, and to 
 decry whatever it decries, would be one of the strongest advo- 
 cates of slavery among slaveholders, and one of the loudest 
 demanders of abolition among the enemies of slavery. But let 
 us suppose that slavery was exterminated by violence, and that 
 every slaveholder was compelled to relinquish all his slaves, 
 would this better the condition of the world? Would this 
 arrest oppression and injustice, and make all men benevolent 
 and upright ? It would merely set loose a multitude of ignor- 
 ant, unprincipled, immoral men, and give them the power to 
 follow the promptings of their evil hearts. ~No permanent and 
 beneficial reformation can be effected, except through the 
 mercy and grace of God in Christ, and these are usually 
 bestowed through the instrumentality of his Church. 
 
 2. A slave belongs to the lowest condition of men, and is 
 often exposed to injuries and oppression from his master with- 
 out being able to obtain relief. To mitigate the evils of his 
 condition, to teach his master that though he is a slave, he is 
 yet a man, an immortal and accountable being like himself; 
 to assert his rights, and shelter him from injury, God took him 
 into covenant with himself, and along with his master and his 
 master's children, commanded him to be circumcised. He 
 thus taught the master, that while he permitted him to retain 
 the slave as his property, and to require from him labor, and 
 obedience to all his lawful commands, he must beware how he 
 oppressed and injured him ; that he, as the covenant-God of 
 his slave, would be the avenger of his wrongs, and that he 
 required of him, as the master, to respect the rights, and 
 endeavor to promote the spiritual welfare of his slave, and to 
 treat him not only as a man, but as a brother in the Lord. 
 
 To the slave, too, who was bought from among the heathen, 
 it was a privilege of unspeakable value thus to be admitted 
 to the covenant of the people of God. JSTot only was the con- 
 dition of the slave among the heathen much more degraded 
 and wretched than among the Israelites, but he lived and died 
 in spiritual darkness and hopelessness. But among the 
 Hebrews he was placed under the protection of the covenant 
 and law of God. He was taught that he was not a poor, 
 
22 ADDRESS. 
 
 degraded, wretched, and friendless outcast; but that the eternal 
 God was his father and his protector, who admitted him to the 
 blessings and the privileges of his covenant, and gave him a 
 name and a place in his Church. How great was the privi- 
 vilege, how rich were the blessings bestowed on him ! 
 
 Among the laws that God gave to protect the slave from the 
 cruelty of the master, one was the following : " If a man smite 
 his servant or his maid with a rod, and he die under his hand, 
 he shall be surely punished. Notwithstanding, if he continue 
 a day or two, he shall not be punished for he is his money." 
 Another law was, that : " If a man smite the eye of his serv- 
 ant, or the eye of his maid, that it perish, he shall let him go 
 free for his eye's sake. And if he smite out his man-servant's 
 tooth or his maid-servant's tooth, he shall let him go free for 
 his tooth's sake." (Exod. 21 : 20, 21, 26, 27.) Some suppose 
 that the meaning of the words " he shall be punished," in the 
 law relative to beating a slave, is that he shall be punished 
 with death ; but many commentators think that it means that 
 he shall be punished at the discretion of the magistrate, accord- 
 ing to the circumstances of the case. It is, however, implied in 
 this case, that the master has beaten his slave with a proper and 
 usual instrument of correction, that he did not intend to murder 
 him, and that the loss of property and of services is part of his 
 punishment. We learn, too, that the mutilation of any mem- 
 ber of the body of a slave by his master entitled him to free- 
 dom. 
 
 The Hebrews were commanded to give to their slaves the 
 rest of the Sabbath, and to allow them to partake along with 
 themselves, and their sons and their daughters, of the feasts 
 which were made of the second tithes. (Deut. 12 : 17, 18 ; 
 16 : 11.) Thus they were not only protected from the cruelty of 
 their masters, but admitted to partake in their most sacred 
 festivals, and to rejoice along with them. 
 
 3. It would be interesting to compare the state of slaves 
 among the Hebrews, with their state in other and heathen 
 nations, and to show its superiority. A writer on Hebrew 
 antiquities has correctly remarked, that though "they were 
 sometimes the subjects of undue severity of treatment, and of 
 sufferings in various ways, (Jer. 34:8-22,) still it can not be 
 denied that their condition was better amonsr the Hebrews 
 
EEASONS FOR THE PERMISSION OF SLAVERY. 23 
 
 than among some other nations, as may be learnt from their 
 well-known rebellions against the Greeks and Eomans. Nor 
 is it at all wonderful that the Hebrews differed from other 
 nations in the treatment of their slaves, in a way so much to 
 their credit, when we consider that in other countries there 
 was no Sabbath for the slave, no day of rest, and no laws 
 sanctioned by the Divinity." (Jahn, §172.) 
 
 From the few intimations that are given us on the subject, 
 it seems that pious masters, before the coming of Christ, treated 
 their slaves with strict justice and humanity ; that the con- 
 dition of their slaves was easy, and that they were not only 
 contented, but often strongly attached to their masters. Who 
 can read the interesting prayers of the eldest servant of Abra- 
 ham, his fidelity in the discharge of the duty committed to him, 
 and the terms in which he speaks of his master, without the 
 conviction that strong friendship towards each other existed in 
 both the master and the slave? (Gen. 21.) Holy Job had his 
 slaves, and numerous slaves too ; but that he was far from 
 oppressing them, and that he rightly discharged his duty to 
 them, is manifest from his solemn protestation before God : "If 
 I did despise the cause of my man-servant or of my maid serv- 
 ant when they contended with me, what then shall I do when 
 God riseth up ; and when he visiteth, what shall I answer him ? 
 Did not He that made me in the womb make him ? and did not 
 one fashion us in the womb ?" (Job 31 : 13, 15.) 
 
 Such were the laws which God gave to the Hebrews, which 
 continued throughout their whole commonwealth, under which 
 Christ, as the Son of Man, and his holy apostles, lived, and to 
 which, in all their teachings and writings, we find no objec- 
 tion — not a single word of their injustice, or of the propriety 
 of their repeal, or even of their amendment. What, too, is 
 more remarkable, is the fact that, if slavery is unjust, Christ, in 
 his comment on, and explanation of the law of Moses, in his 
 Sermon on the Mount, does not give the slightest intimation 
 of it. 
 
 When we turn to the inspired writings of the Apostles, writings 
 addressed to fully organized Christian churches, whose govern- 
 ment and discipline were administered by the laws of Christ's 
 kingdom, do we find that they denounced slaveholding as a sin ? 
 Do they require a protest against slavery, or enjoin on masters 
 
2-i ADDRESS. 
 
 the immediate emancipation of their slaves as a condition of 
 admittance to their communion, or of continuance in it? There 
 is not a syllable of the kind in all their writings. The Apostle 
 having exhorted slaves to the faithful discharge of the duties 
 which they owed to' their masters, from the fear of God, and a 
 regard to his glory, commands the masters to do their duty to 
 the slaves in the same manner. He says: " And ye masters, 
 do the same thing unto them, forbearing threatening : knowing 
 that your Master also is in heaven, neither is there respect of 
 persons with him." (Eph. G:9.) "Masters, give unto your 
 servants that which is just and equal, knowing that ye also 
 have a Master in heaven." (Col. 4 : 1.) 
 
 The position, then, in which slavery is now placed by the 
 laws of Christ is this : They concede to masters the right of 
 ownership of their slaves, and at the same time they remind 
 them that there are important duties which they owe to them 
 as immortal, and many of them as redeemed creatures, whom 
 God has taken into covenant with himself, and that they must 
 give account to him for the manner in which they discharge or 
 violate these duties. They command the slave to submit to 
 the rule of his master, and to perform the duties which lie 
 owes to him with fidelity, and in the fear of God. To both the 
 master and the slave, they say : "As ye would that men should 
 do to you, do ye also to them likewise." (Luke 6 : 31.) "We are 
 aware that this passage has been interpreted to mean, that as 
 no man desires to be held in slavery, so the slaveholder should 
 gratify the desires of the slave and make him free. This is 
 entirely changing the rule, and making it to read thus: 
 •' Whatsoever others would that you should do to them that do 
 ye to them." But it is : "As ye would that others should do 
 to you, do ye also to them likewise." We have no right to 
 desire others to give up their lawful rights, or to do unjustly, 
 for our sakes ; nor does Christ intend that we shall sacrifice 
 our rights, or fail to do our duties, for the sake of gratifying 
 the unreasonable or unlawful and sinful desires of others, 
 'lake the case of a murderer and a judge or a juryman. Would 
 it be right for a judge or a juryman to reason thus : " If I were 
 in the ease of this murderer I should wish to be acquitted, but 
 I ought to do to him what were I in his circumstances, and he 
 in mine, I would wish him to do to me, and therefore I will 
 
REASONS FOR THE PERMISSION OF SLAVERY. 25 
 
 acquit liirti" ? The meaning of the precept is, that in our con- 
 duct to others we should have a constant regard to the law of 
 God, and act towards them with the same benevolence, truth, 
 and justice, as we have a right to wish them to act towards 
 us ; thus conscientiously performing to each other the duties 
 belonging to our relative positions and conditions in life. The 
 law of God, and not the desires of others is the rule of our con- 
 duct. A covetous man, through the inordinate love of money, 
 runs deeply in debt to an honest man. He is exceedingly 
 unwilling to pay the debt, and, though he has ample means to 
 do so, yet most earnestly wishes his creditor to relinquish it. 
 Does this precept require the honest and laborious creditor to 
 do so, and to act on such reasonings as this : " This man who 
 owes me a large sum of money, though he is able to pay it, 
 yet wishes me to relinquish my claim to it ; true, indeed, it is 
 the gain of jeaximi honest industry and frugality, and the loss 
 of it will reduce me to poverty ; but yet, if I were in his cir- 
 cumstances, and had his disposition, and if he were in my cir- 
 cumstances, I should have the same desires as his, and there- 
 fore it is my duty to comply with his desires, and relinquish 
 my claim to the debt." If we should thus interpret and act on 
 this precept, we should introduce a frightful state of society. 
 The rule contemplates a continuance of its established order ; 
 that the parent shall retain his authority f^er his child, and 
 the child revere and obey his parent ; that the husband shall 
 be kind and faithful to his wife, and the wife shall be affection- 
 ate and faithful to her husband ; that the master shall be just 
 and merciful to his slave, and the slave be obedient and faith- 
 ful to his master. 
 
 In the Epistle of Paul to Philemon, we have an admirable 
 illustration of this rule, as applicable to the case of a master 
 and his runaway slave. Having declared his strong affection 
 for Philemon, the high esteem in which he held Ids Christian 
 character, and the joy and consolation he received from the 
 accounts which he heard of his kindness to the people of God, 
 and usefulness in the Church ; he, in the gentlest and kindest 
 terras intercedes with him for Onesimus, his slave. He reminds 
 Philemon of his authority, as an Apostle of Christ, to command 
 him, but he tells him that for love's sake he would rather be- 
 seech him. He reminds him that he was Paul the aged. He 
 
26 ADDRESS. 
 
 had grown gray in the service of Christ, and in the midst of 
 perils, and persecutions, and prisons, and poverty, and stonings, 
 and scourges, and shipwrecks, had triumphantly carried for- 
 ward the banner of the Cross, and won thousands to Christ. 
 And who is he that this intrepid Apostle so humbly beseeches? 
 Is he a man who is claiming what does not belong to him ? 
 who is insisting on what is wrong and sinful in itself? And 
 does Paul quail before this man ! Does he who stood 
 undaunted before Rome's cruel tyrant, Nero, cower before an 
 obscure church-member, who wickedly claims what it is sinful 
 for him to possess ? Had this been the fact, had God's law 
 forbidden Philemon to hold his slave, would this holy Apostle, 
 whose soul was adamant, and the lightning-flash of whose eye 
 made Felix tremble, would he for an instant have shrunk from 
 telling Philemon that he had no right to hold a slave ? that 
 slaveholding is in itself a sin ? and if he had not relinquished 
 all claim to the slave, would he not have denounced against 
 him the severest vengeance of Almighty God? This would be 
 the course which some modern reformers would have pre- 
 scribed to him ; but the course which he pursued was directly 
 the opposite : and either this holy and inspired Apostle erred, 
 or they are in grievous error. He knew that Philemon had 
 rights ; he admitted those rights. He knew that, by the 
 Roman law, he had the power to punish his slave, not only 
 with scourges, but with death. (Juvenal 6 : 219.) He knew, 
 too, that even a good man might be hurried to excesses by 
 passion and resentment. He, therefore, used entreaties. He 
 says : " Though I might be much bold in Christ to enjoin thee 
 that which is convenient, yet for love's sake I rather beseech 
 thee." Surely, if Philemon had one spark of noble, generous 
 Christian feeling in his heart, he must have been astonished 
 and humbled at such an address from such a one as he knew 
 Paul to be, the aged Apostle of Christ, illustrious for his serv- 
 ices and his sufferings, honored far above all others by God ; 
 who had already been rapt up into the third heaven, and now, 
 close on the verge of life, stood ready, and waiting for the 
 summons to ascend to his Saviour and his God, and receive his 
 unfading crown of righteousness — that he should tenderly and 
 earnestly beseech him ! And for whom does he beseech him ? 
 Why, for his poor runaway slave, Onesimus. But the Apostle 
 
REASONS FOR THE PERMISSION OF SLAVERY. 27 
 
 does not now speak of him as a slave ; lie commends him as 
 his son : thus intimating to Philemon, that if he had any 
 respect or love for him, the father, he must show it by kind- 
 ness for his sake to his son. " I beseech thee for my son, 
 Onesimus, whom I have begotten in my bonds ; whom I have 
 sent again. Thou, therefore, receive him that is mine own 
 bowels." What tenderness ! what meekness ! what humility ! 
 But we can not pursue our remarks further on this wonderful 
 epistle. 
 
 Suffice it to say, that both Philemon, the master, and 
 Onesimus, the slave, had been converted to Christ through the 
 instrumentality of Paul, and he, reminding Philemon of this, 
 exhorted him to receive his returned slave, " not now as a serv- 
 ant," (slave,) "but above a servant," (slave,) " a brother be- 
 loved especially to me ; but how much more unto thee, both 
 in the flesh and in the Lord." No heathen, no infidel, ever 
 could have acted thus from such principles, or have used such 
 arguments and such motives to induce a master to treat with 
 humanity his slaves. Yes ; there are Christians that are slave- 
 holders ; there are slaves that are Christians; and there are 
 Christians'who are the friends of slaveholders and their slaves; 
 and who are willing, like Paul, to hail them as brethren in 
 Christ Jesus, and to sit down with them at the sacramental 
 table of their common Lord and Saviour. When Philemon 
 received from Onesimus himself, and had read this epistle from 
 Paul, with what emotions must he have received his slave! 
 Methinks that with gushing tears, and a throbbing heart, he 
 clasped him in his arms, and welcomed him back to his home ; 
 and when at the close of that day he and his household bowed 
 in worship before God, he thanked and praised him with the 
 liveliest gratitude, and with his whole soul, for his conversion 
 and return. You, Christian brethren, who yourselves have 
 tasted of the grace and goodness of the Lord, can judge of his 
 feelings. Through the benign influences of the Gospel, the 
 bitterness of servitude is lessened and sweetened, and " the 
 brother of low degree rejoices in that he is exalted, but the rich 
 in that he is made low." (James 1 : 9.) Philemon after his 
 conversion was a better master, and Onesimus after his return 
 was a better slave. 
 The mitigating influence of Christianity was shown by the 
 
28 ADDRESS. 
 
 conduct of the first Christian emperor of Home, Constantino the 
 Great, who abolished the punishment of slaves by crucifixion, 
 and facilitated their manumission, which before was attended 
 with great difficulties and no small expense, but which he ren- 
 dered easy, and no ways chargeable.* 
 
 I owe an apology to Synod for trespassing so long on their 
 time ; but I trust that the importance of the subject will be my 
 excuse. Permit me, however, to remark, that our Southern 
 Christian brethren are fully impressed with their duty to com- 
 municate the Gospel to their slaves, and to give them suitable 
 religious instructions and privileges. None can more strongly 
 insist on this duty than does the Southern Presbyterian Review, 
 a very able and excellent work, published at Columbia, S. C. 
 It says, speaking of their slaves : 
 
 "We still bear in mind that they are men, and have immortal souls; that 
 Christ shed his blood to redeem them as well as ourselves, and that we are put 
 in charge of their training as that of our own children, for his kingdom of 
 glory. It is, then, as plain as daylight that Christianity condemns all laws of 
 the State, and all ideas and practices of individuals which put aside the im- 
 mortality of the slave, and regard him in any other light than that of a moral 
 and responsible fellow-creature of our own. We have no hesitation in declar- 
 ing that we accord with Judge O'Neall in earnestly desiring the repeal, for 
 example, of the law against teaching the slave to read, .... because, we con- 
 ceive the law is both useless and hurtful. It is a useless law, for very many of 
 our best citizens continually break it, or allow it to be broken in our families. 
 Besides, very many of our slaves can read, and do teach and will teach others. 
 .... But the law is hurtful, inasmuch as it throws an obstacle in the way of 
 that which it is plainly the wisdom of the State to foster and encourage, 
 namely, the religious instruction of the young negro population." 
 
 The writer asserts that " Christianity, while it civilizes the 
 slave, improves him in all parts of his character. It takes 
 away piecemeal the mass of barbarian ignorance, superstition, 
 and corruption. It is advantageous to their whole physical, 
 intellectual, and moral nature. It makes the slaves better, 
 more intelligent, industrious, tractable, trusty — better men, bet- 
 ter servants of God, better servants of man. . . . And what is 
 the effect of Christianity upon the master ? It softens his 
 spirit in the sternness of law and discipline, while it confirms 
 and establishes these just bonds. Whatever was formerly 
 harsh in the relation is gradually removed. Mutual intercourse 
 is sweetened by it ; the master is no tyrant, the slave no rebel. 
 "Authority ceases to be severe ; obedience ceases to be a task." 
 
 * Ant Uni. Hist., vol. 15, book 3, ch. 25, pp. 5*76, 577. 
 
REASONS FOR THE PERMISSION OF SLAVERY. 29 
 
 {jS&uthem Presbyterian fieview, vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 579-581.) 
 "One tiling," say they, addressing their fellow-citizens of the 
 South, "is plain. It is ours to do the duties of intelligent, 
 decided, fearless, conscientious Christian masters, and future 
 events we may leave with Him who will direct them well." 
 (P. 585.) 
 
 Let us remember, that if we refuse to receive these 
 churches into full communion with ourselves, we not only ex- 
 clude the masters, but along with them their slaves ; many of 
 whom are members in full communion in the same churches 
 with their masters, and sit down with them at the same sacra- 
 mental table. It is a startling fact in the history of the Church 
 in our country, that a Southern Aid Society has been formed 
 in this city, (New- York,) avowedly for the purpose of supplying 
 the deficiency of the American Home Missionary Society, who, 
 it is said, forbear to send missionaries to our Southern and 
 South- Western States, because they hold slaves. Can it be 
 that they thus act because they have lost confidence in the 
 efficacy of the Gospel, to remove and cure the sins and evils of 
 the world, and have found an obstacle too great for it to over- 
 come } . 
 
 In reading the life of the late excellent Bishop "White, 
 of Pennsylvania, I have met with one of his letters, dated in 
 1811, in which he says, that there then was " clanger of the ex- 
 tinction of the profession of Christianity among a great propor- 
 tion of the people of the United States." It would seem, from 
 the course that the Home Missionary Society pursues towards 
 them, that they are willing that this event should happen in 
 our Southern States. What a contrast to the conduct of Christ, 
 who commenced his public ministry, by going among " the 
 people who sat in darkness and in the region and shadow ot 
 death," (Matt. 4 :15, 16,) and who came to save the chief ol 
 sinners. But they seem to think that our Southern brethren 
 are in a darkness so deep, and are sinners so great, that their 
 condition is hopeless ; or that they deserve to die in their sins, 
 without the Gospel. Dark, however, as they may consider 
 their state to be, it is the firm conviction of the writer of this, 
 and he speaks from personal knowledge, that the Gospel is 
 preached in greater, and in many instances in far greater purity, 
 and consequently with far greater power, in the pulpits of the 
 
30 ADDRESS. 
 
 Southern churches generally, than it is in a large number of 
 the Northern churches. That some of the Southern masters 
 are cruel to their slaves he does not deny. This, however, is 
 only admitting that there are cruel men at the South, as well 
 as at the North. But he confidently asserts, that public senti- 
 ment in the South is strong against such cruel masters ; and he 
 believes that should such a scene occur among them as the 
 death of " Uncle Tom," it would send a thrill of horror, and 
 produce as strong detestation throughout our Southern as it 
 would throughout our Northern States. Our Southern breth- 
 ren complain, and they complain with truth, that " so mon- 
 strous are the misrepresentations which ignorance, malice, and 
 fanaticism are constantly and assiduously propagating in re- 
 gard to this (the slave) relation among us, that if our names 
 were not actually written under the pictures, we should never 
 suspect that they were intended for us." Sure we are, that 
 withholding the Gospel from them, and refusing to hold eccle- 
 siastical connection with them, will produce no beneficial 
 results, while it may be attended with most disastrous conse- 
 quences. 
 
 Hitherto we have, as a nation, run a career of unex- 
 ampled prosperity ; and, bound together by that glorious Con- 
 stitution, which, under the guidance of Heaven, the wisdom 
 and patriotism of our fathers formed, we have reposed in the 
 peace and the safety of a mighty empire, while a glorious 
 future opens before us. Not only do our own safety and hap- 
 piness require the perpetuity of our Union, but true patriots 
 and philanthropists throughout the world desire with intense 
 anxiety the success of our attempt at self-government, and the 
 dissolution of our Union would be a fearful blow to the cause 
 of true freedom throughout the world. To ourselves it would 
 bring ruin, for it would at once plunge us into the horrors of a 
 civil war. And for what ? Why, for the maintenance of an 
 infidel abstraction, concerning the inalienable rights of man, in 
 what they call a state of nature. Suppose, then, that the three 
 millions of Southern slaves were all liberated at once, that the 
 wishes of the Abolitionist were carried out to their full extent, 
 what would be their condition ? Would we join them to drive 
 the Southern white men from their homes, and to seize their 
 property, and so throw them out, with their families, houseless, 
 
REASONS FOR THE PERMISSION OF SLAVERY. 31 
 
 impoverished, and helpless? Or are the Abolitionists of the: 
 North prepared to receive and support these three millions of 
 slaves ? The greatest injustice and cruelty that could be done 
 to them, would be simply to carry at once into execution that 
 for which, not the slaves, but the Abolitionists are contending. 
 And shall we, for such a mad scheme, break up our confeder- 
 acy and dissolve our Union? Where is the true-hearted 
 American that advocates this ? Where is the American so 
 ungrateful to God for the blessings of the government under 
 which he lives, and such a traitor to his country, as to consent 
 to the breaking up of our Union, and consequently the destruc- 
 tion of our own happiness, and of our usefulness to the world, 
 that now stand in bright prospect before us ? And what would 
 be the gains of such traitorous and diabolical schemes, should 
 they prove successful ? Who would be benefited by them ? 
 Not one ; while all would be losers. None can predict what 
 disasters and crimes and sorrows would follow an event so 
 marked by folly and wickedness. All the denunciations and 
 slanders and bitterness of Abolitionists will never benefit the 
 slaves of the South. These are not the methods which God 
 employs to bless men. His Church is " the light of the world," 
 is " the salt of the earth," by which he instructs, purifies, and 
 elevates them. 
 
 Shall we then join hands with the Abolitionist, and dis- 
 own every Christian minister, and close every church at the 
 South, so far as in us lies, abolish from among them the 
 Sabbath, and the worship of God, and the sacred ordinances of 
 our religion, and leave them, in spiritual matters, in a deeper 
 than Egyptian darkness ; and this, too, for not doing what they 
 can not do, emancipate at once all their slaves ? Our brethren 
 of the Classis of North-Carolina are the true friends of the 
 slaves among whom they live, as well as of their masters ; and 
 are laboring, as the ministers of God, to convey to them the 
 blessings of salvation. Christ has owned them as his minis- 
 ters, and they come to us in the name of Christ, seeking to be 
 one with us. Shall we repel them ? Shall the Dutch Church, 
 which has heretofore gloried in the reputation of its steadfast- 
 ness in the truth and purity of the Gospel, and of its conserva- 
 tive influence amid the agitations and changes that have for 
 years past shaken society, now abandon its conservative course. 
 
32 address; 
 
 and forfeit its conservative character ? No. Let us take these, 
 our Southern brethren, by the hand, and say to them : Christian 
 brethren, we own and we bless you as such in the name of the 
 Lord. We hail you in your good works, and in all your 
 efforts to instruct and enlighten and Christianize the slaves 
 that are among you. Our arms are open to receive you ; and, 
 while we ask the blessing of God on you and your labors, we 
 welcome you as one with us in Christ. 
 

 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 
 
 0011 
 
 932 599 7 % 
 
 
 ■■■. ,-<k. ^ ...".- ■ •„ ^fj 
 
 - ^ >. . 
 
 »::!%fe 
 
 6» " 
 
 YtXlS