aass___, BoorJaI \ O/^.;^ A COMPEND OF HISTORY, FROM THE EARLIEST TIMES ; / COMPREHENDING A GENERAL VIEW OF THE PRESEJSTT STATE OF THE WORLD, WITH RESPECT TO CIVILIZATION, RELIGION, AND GOVERNMENT; AND A BRIEF DISSERTATIOJT ON THE IMPORTANCE OF HISTORICAL KNOWLEDGE. /' A- BY SAMUEL WHEI PLEY, A. M. Principal of the Newark Academy. SIXtH EDIT'ION, WirH CORRECI'IONS^ BY REV. JOSEPH EMKHSON, Principal of the Female Seminary at Saugus. ^r^OFGO^. TWO VOLUMES IN ONE, VOL. I. ^o -.^ BOSTON: PUBLISHED BY RICHARDSON & LORD. J. H. A. Frost, Printer Congress-street. 1822. : DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS, to wit : District Clerk^s Office, BE IT REMEMBERED, that on the twenty-third day of May, A. D. 1820, in the Forty-fourth Year of the Independence of the United States of America, West, Richardson & Lord, of the said District, have deposited in this Office, the Title of a Book, the right whereof they claim as Proprietors in the words following, to wit: '' A Compend of Hi-tory, from the earliest times ; comprehend- ing a General View of the Present State of the World, with re- spect to Civilization, Religion and Government ; and a Brief Dissertation on the Importance of Historical Knowledge. By Sa^.iuel Whelpley, a. M. Principal of the Newark Academy. Fourth Edition, with Corrections, By Rev. Joseph Emerson, Principal of the Byfield Seminary. Two V^olumes in one. Vol. I." In conformity to the act of the Congress of the United States, entitled, '' An act for the encouragement of learning, by securing the copies of maps, chart?, and books, to the authors and propri- etors of such copies, during the times therein mentioned ;" and also to an act entitled, '' An act, supplementary to an act, entitled, an act for the encouragement of learning, by securing the copies of maps, charts, and books, to the authors and proprietors of such copies, during the times therein mentioned ; and extending the benefits thereof to the arts of designing, engraving and etching bistorical and other prints." JOHN W. DAVIS, Clerk of the District of Mcussachusatis. c?0 REF. SAMUEL MILLER, D. B. ONE OF THE MINISTERS OF THE UNITED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHES IN THE CITY OF NEW-YORK, &,C. &C. REVEREND SIR, WITH little more claim on you than what the mass of society have on the benevolent notice of the learned, the wise, and the good, 1 have presumed to inscribe to you the following Compend of History ; the chief merit of which, I am highly sensible, must consist much in the motive of the author. Destined by Providence to be entrusted with the education of youth, I have long- regarded it as an important inquiry, what branches of knowledge and what modes of instruction are best calcu- lated to benefit the young mind — what objects will be most likely to arrest the attention, enlarge the under- standing, strengthen the memory, and promote virtuous dispositions. Whilst, on the one hand, I have not the vanity to think that I have made any important discoveries in this inquiry ; so, neither am I discouraged, on the other, by the reflection that the wise and learned in every age have been more or less engaged in the same inquiry. If the lapse of ages has corrected the errors of Lycurgus, Solon, and Aristotle, it is presumed that the most approved systems of the present day, having endured a similar test, will also be found defective. The study of history is too much neglected in our present course of education ; and I am strongly impressed v/ith the belief that children may lay a broad foundation for historical knowledge, while learning to read, and may become very generally acquainted with history, merely in a common course of school reading. No species of in>«{ ruction so easily or so deeply imprints itseifoa the memory of youth, .is that which is clothed in Simple narration and description ; especially if that IV DEDICATION. narration convey interesting facts — and if that description engage and delight the imagiuation. It has often been observed, that an early taste for reading is likely to enkindle in the mind a desire for general improvement ; and, if I may be allowed to appeal to my own experience, the reading of history was the first thing which awakened in me a desire to study the sciences. With these views, Reverend Sir.^ 1 have been induced to publish the foiiowingCompend. 1 have often found myself embarrassed, in passing through so wide a field — wil^h such rapidity. A selection and arrangement were desired that would mark an unbroken line, and give the reader a just, general and connected impression. How far I have succeeded in the attempt the reader must judge. Had I more leisure, or a better judgment, the work would have been more correct. But, as it is, 1 hope it will answer the purpose for which it is designed, and, especialiy, that it may be so fortunate as to gain the sanction of your approbation. While modesty forbids me to say many things, which the voice of sincerity would prompt, I deem it but just to declare, that as far as dedication may be regarded as a mark of high personal respect — as far as presuming on the benevolent patronage of men of learning and talents is ever safe — and as far as a writer may hope to benefit his production by inscribing it to a name which must long adorn the temple of science — so far 1 felicitate myself o« this occasion : And am, Reverend Sir, with the highest esteem and considerations your most obedient and very humble servant, SAMUEL WHELPLE^ . EDITOR'S PREFACE. IT has been objected to Compends of history, that they are dry, uninteresting and tedious. By most of them, this censure is undoubtedly deserved ; and justly charges them with a fault of no ordinary magnitude; This is a fault which must almost entirel}'^ exclude them from being used, except by those, to whom, lesson by lesson they are assigned, as tasks — as tasks by no means delightful. And when we consider, that it should be a grand and leading object in education to fix the thought, to wake the slumbering energies of the mind, to unfold the faculties, and kindle a thirst for knowledge, w^e can hardly suppose, that such dreary tasks will be found very useful. From the charge of dulness, however, it is confidently hoped, that this Comj)end will be forever exempted. It is found to be exceedingly interesting both to the begin- ner, and to the proficient in history. Even after the second and third reading, it still continues to charm. JVTuch of it is written with a pathos and energy, that would not have disgraced the pen of Chatham. But this is not its only excellence. The facts are well selected, and, in general, well arranged. We have most to regret, that the work is so short. To deny, that this Compend has imperfections, would be to make it more than human. The most indifferent parts are imquestionably the first, second, third and last chapters. These are rather appendages to history, than a part of history itself In these, the author appears to I* VI PREFACE. have fallen far below himself. It would be taken too great a liberty, however, to expung-e them ; or to attempt to supply their place with any thing better. Nor does the editor feel at liberty to transpose them ; though it may be best for the learner to begin with the last chap- ter, and conclude with the three first. It is hoped, that the value of this edition is considera- bly enhanced — that it will be found much more correct in various respects, than preceding- editions. A few sen- tences have been omitterl, as unimportant. The great- est liberty has been taken with the Chronological Tables^ as not being of Mr. Whelpley's composition. Several of them, which were conjectural, or of little importance to us, have been omitted. Much time has been spent to render the rest as correct, as possible. It is hoped the notes will be found both interesting and tiseful. Method of teaching the following Compend. 1. Let the pupil read over the lesson assigned, to gain a general idea of the connexion. As he proceeds, let him carefully consult his dictionary and maps, as far as may be needful, in order to understand the words of the author and the situation of places mentioned. 2. Let the pupil read over the lesson in connexion with the printed questions, marking the answers, as he proceeds. 3. Let him commit the answers to memory. Tiet him be particularly careful to read and think them over delih' erately and under standingly^ that he may be able to repeat them with propriety. 4- Let two pupils ask each other the questions. 5. Let the pupil read over the lesson once more, to fix the connexion more perfectly in his mind, and to prepare to answer whatever questions the teacher may propose. PREFACE. Yll 6. Let the pupil be required to answer not only all the printed questions, but such others, as the instructor may deem important. 7. Let the pupil be required to recite his lesson with the greatest possible propriety, as it respects delibera- tion, pauses, emphasis, cadence, &c. By this means he may be constantly advancing in the important art of reading. The indistinct, confused, monotonous, hurrying manner, in which scholars are often allowed to recite, can hardly fail to injure their reading. 8. The more difficult questions, especiall}^ such as are addressed to the judgment, rather thsfn to the memory, may be addressed to the class generall}^, that any one may answer them, who may be able. 9. The instructor may find it very useful to intersperse or add a considerable number of observations, to explain, illustrate, confirm, or enforce the most important parts of the lesson. 10. Let the exercises at the end of each week be a re- view. If the scholars are sufficiently forward in writing, &,c. it may be very useful for them to recite their review- lessons to each other; and give each other certificates in the following form — This certifies that Miss A B has promptly and correctly repeated to me answers to Historical Questions, contained in the recita- tions of the present week. C D . Date. 11. It may be useful for the instructor to ask miscella- neous questions, relating to any part of history, that the pupil has studied, such as. Who was Ninyas ? Who was Sennacherib ? Who were the Scythians ? In what, were the Persians superior to the Greeks? lu what, were the Romans superior to the Greeks, &c. Vlll PREFACE. If the special efforts, that have now been made for the improvement of this excellent Compend, should prove instrumental of extending- the noble and delightful study of history, of promoting a taste for literature in general, and of leading ihe minds of youth to a devout acknow- ledgment of HIM who rules in the kingdoms of men, it will afford the editor his richest reward, lor all the toil of correction. JOSEPH EMERSON. Byfieid, May 1, 1820. SIXTH EDITION OF THE COMPEND. Though it is by no means to he expected, that a volume of this size will be entirely free from mistakes, it is con- fidently hoped, that this edition will be found more cor- rect, than the preceding. It is also believed, that the lovers of history and of truth will consider the value of this very popular work as still farther enhanced by a considerable number of notes, which are added to this edition. It affords the editor no small satisfaction to indulge the hope, that he may have been in some measure instru- mental of promoting the circulation of a Compend of History, which he considers the most interesting, within so small a compass, that has yet appeared in an English dress. J. E. Saugus, April 24, 1 822, TABLE OF CONTENTS. VOL. I. CHAPTER T. Page. THE Credibility of the Mosaic History, .... 13 CHAPTER 1!. Causes which have operated to plunge Ancient History into darkness, 28 CHAPTER III. Sources, whence the knowledge of Ancient History is drawn, 31 CHAPTER IV. Brief Plistorical View of the Assyrian Empire, from its foundation to the reign of Ninyas, .... 39 CHAPTER V. -of the Assyrian Empire, from the reign of Ninyas to the fall of Nineveh, . . 45 CHAPTER VL ■of the Assyrian Empire, from the destruction of Nineveh to the taking of Baby- lon by Cyrus, 61 CHAPTER VII. -of the Persian Empire, from its foundation to the birth of Cyrus, 55 CHAPTER VIII. -of the Persian Empire, from the birth of Cyrus to the conquest of the Lesser Asia, * 6: X €0?JTENTS. CHAPTER IX. Page. Brief Historical View of the Persian Empire, from the reduction of Asia Minor, by Cyius, till its subversion by Alexander, 67 CHAPTER X. -of Ancient Greece, from the earliest times to the legislation of Lycurgus, . CHAPTER XI. ■of Ancient Greece, from the legislation of Lycurgus till the issue of the Per- sian Invasion, 8i) CHAPTER XII. ■of Ancient Greece, from the Persian Invasion till the death of Alexander the Great, 103 CHAPTER XIII. -of Alexander's Empire, from his death till its subjugation by the Romans . . 13T CHAPTER XIV. -of the Roman Empire, from the founding of Rome by Romulus to the expul- sion of Tarquin the Proud ; containing a period of 245 years, 150 CHAPTER XV. the Roman Empire, from the expulsion of Tarquin to the conquest of Car- thage, 157 CHAPTER XVI. ■of the Roman Empire, from the iaW of Carthage to the reign of Commodus ; containing a period of 312 years, 188 CONTENTS. XI CHAPTER XVII. Page. General Observations on the Roman History, from the accession of Augustus to the death of Marcus Aurelius, 209 CHAPTER XVIII. Brief Hiitorical View of the Roman Empire, from the reign of Commodus to the extinction of the Western Empire, under Augustulus; containing a period of 283 years, 217 CHAPTER XIX. ■of the course of Empire, from the fall of Rome to the establishment of the Em- pire of Charlemagne ; containing a period of 324 years, ....... 227 HISTORICAL COMPEND. CHAPTER L INTRODUCTORY. THE CREDIBILITY OF THE MOSAIC HISTORY. THAT the existence of the human race, has no rational claim to a higher antiquit}', than is allowed in the Mosaic histor}', may be argued from two con- siderations : 1. The total want of evidence of a higher antiquity. 2. Various evidences, that the scripture chronology is correct. 1. There is a total want of evidence of higher an- tiquity. Had the world existed from eternity, and man passed through an eternal series of generations, it is highly probable, that numerous evidences would ex- ist, of periods more distant than six thousand years. It is a thing incredible, that no traces of a much higher antiquity, should have been discovered by the Greeks, Egyptians or Chaldeans : yet they fixed the origin of the human race at no distant period ; and as we shall state hereafter, it is within the limits of scripture chronology. The pretended antiquity of the Chinese and In- dians, is found, upon the most strict and impartial examination, to be void of credibility. Their records are incorrect, fabulous, and made up of parts, incom- patible with each other. The grand annals of China are contained in six hundred and sixty-eight volumes, of which a copy is in France. This is abridged in a hundred volumes; 2 14 THE CREDIBILITY OF from which the Abbe Grosier has extracted a work of twelve volumes, comprising a history of China. From these records, it appears that that enipire must have originated a short time prior to the reign of Yao, which was 2057 years before Christ : of course near the time, that Ninus founded the Assyrian em- pire. This statement is confirmed, not only by all Europeans, whose knowledge of the Chinese lan- guage has enabled them to examine those records, but by several learned Chinese, who have studied the languages of Europe : and this statement also corroborates the opinion, that Noah himself, or one of his sons, founded that empire. It appears proba- ble, from the general current of oriental tradition, that Noah left the general settlement, and emigrated eastward, where his posterity afterwards founded the Chinese monarchy, as we shall hereafter more par- ticularly notice. 2. To these considerations Vv-e may add, that there are various evidences of the correctness of scripture chronology. As there exists no evidence of a higher antiquity, so neither is it possible to fix the creation of the world, and the origin of the human race, in a much later period. The history and chronology of the Bible are liable to no charge of inconsistency. The facts considered in detail, or in. the aggregate, want lione of the genuine characters of true and impar- tial history. When we come to consider the sources, whence the knowledge of ancient history is drawn, we shall see, that they uniformly increase the au- thority, by corroborating the facts of the sacred history. That matter was coeval with God, and independent of him, is more difficult to reconcile with the dic- tates of reason, or to the phenomena of nature, than the doctrine of creation and providence, as laid down in the books of Moses. If it is most easy and rational to believe what is most evident, and if THE MOSAIC HISTORY. 15 wisdom and goodness are displayed in the works of nature, and throughout all Uie visible creation, then to abstain from believing, Vvill be to tollow the weaker, instead of the stronger reason. Those, therefore, who reject the latter, and embrace the. former scheme, are more worthy of the charge of credulity, than those, on whom they bestow it. Neither Cicero nor Plato had any knowledge of antiquity, inconsistent with the Mosaic account of the creation ; indeed, as we extend our inquiries back into ancient ages, we evidently see all the rays of tight converging to one point ; beyond wliich, lit- tle is conjectured — nothing is evident. The account of the deluge may be considered, as the most prominent feature of the first book of Moses. This article of the Bible history is made both the subject of cavil and ridicule by unbeliev- ers, as a thing incredible and absurd. This they commonly do upon the ground of its being a mere matter of revelation ! The evidences, on which its credibility rests, are by no means so generally known, as the importance of the thing seems to de- mand. We shall briefly state the evidences in proof of the truth of this article. 1. Were it regarded merely as a matter of reve- lation, as the objection imports, still it challenges belief. As such, it must be considered as part of a system of truth, which in the sum, and in all its parts, is infallible. The history wTitten by Moses, contains nothing, but what might be looked for in the dictates of a Being of infinite wisdom. His laws can in no instance be taxed with injustice, nor his assertions with falsehood. The character, which Moses ascribes to God, as far transcends any thing found in the heathen writers, as the God of the universe is more glorious than an idol. Among the things written by Moses, th^ character of God^ the origin of the universe, the 16 THE CREDIBILITY OP perfect standard of morality, the maxims of civi! policy, and the excellent code of laws, were all far feeyond the reach of human wisdom. This remark is so certainly true, that among all the productions of mortal men since his time, none have come within an infinite distance of him, but such as have copied from his originals, or drawn from the same fountain of inspiration. Why then should we disbelieve his history ? It states things, which, if they cannot in every instance be proved, can in no instance, be disproved — facts, which the whole current of universal testimony corroborates. Hence, if the certainty of the deluge rested wholly on the authority of revelation, it would need no better support. So far is that from being the case, however, that, in fact, no event is more strongly attested or sustained by the belief of all the ancient nations, as we shall presently state. 2. The geography of the earth affords several strong proofs of a universal deluge. The produc- tions of the sea are found in the most inland parts, not only on the earth's surface, but even deep in its bowels; and not only in valleys and plains, but in hills and mountains. These productions are found in such quantities, as not to be accounted for by any slight or partial cause, and in such a state, as denotes them to have been deposited there for many ages. Had there ever been such a deluge, as Moses describes, such appearances, as are now observed, must have followed. Marine productions must have been washed up on the land, and in many places mingled with it. In one eminent instance (hen, it must be allowed, that the phenomena of nature confirm the truth of the Mosaic history, and that too in an article thought by some the most doubtful. We need inquire for but one cause for one effect; and certainly the universal diffusion of marine pro- ductions, can only be accounted for, by supposing that the ocean once covered the earth. THE MOSAIC HISTORir. 17 The configuration of the surface of the earth, the positions of hills, mountains, valleys and plains, seern to denote some ancient war of elements. They are, generally speaking, so situated and fashioned, as might be expected from the whirlpools, currents, and eddies of the retiring flood, and can only be account- ed for as effects of the deluge. 3. The belief of all the ancient nations, and the testimonies of many writers of antiquity, confirm Moses' account of the deluge, and shew, that no article of ancient history is better supported. We shall here state a few authorities on this subject. 1. The first authority, among the heathen writers^ is that of Berosus the Chaldean. From his testimo- ny we may learn the opinion of the Chaldeans re- specting the flood. If we change the name of Noah for that of Xisuthrus, it will appear that Berosus has the whole history of the deluge complete. Berosus says, " that very anciently the gods being greatly of- fended at the wickedness of the human race, foretoJd to Xisuthrus that they intended to destroy the world by a deluge. Xisuthrus immediately set about build- ing a ship of very great dimensions. After many years, a prodigious vessel was constructed, and Xisu- thrus with his family entered into it, with a multitude of creatures, which were to be preserved. " The flood then came ; the face of the whole earth was covered ; and the vessel which carried the only surviving family of the human race, was buoyed up, and floated on the boundless deluge. The waters at; length abated, and the ship chanced to land on a mountain in Armenia, called Ararat." The same author says, that nigh to his own times, "large pieces of timber were still seen on those mountains, univer- sally supposed to be pieces of the ship of Xisuthrus." Many other Chaldean writers mention the same things : so that the belief of the Chaldeans in the deluge, rests on the most unquestionable authorities. Moreover, the certainty, that they did believe in it, is 2* 18 THE CREDIBILITY OP a consideration of great weight ; for Nimrod founded their empire but a short time after the deluge ; and they, of all the ancient nations, were the most likely to have correct information, as far as depended on tradition. 2. The second authority we shall mention, is Ovid, a writer of the Augustan age. He relates the story, though with different names, much in the same way: He says, that " the gods, to punish the wickedness of man, destroyed the earth with a deluge. The destruction was so complete, that only Deucalion and Pyrrha escaped to the top of mount Parnassus." 3. Varro, the most learned man the Roman state produced, is full to our purpose. Varro says, that " in ancient times, there was a universal deluge, in which the human race were nearly all destroyed." He says, that the flood took place 1600 years before the first Olympiad. Now it is known, that the first Olympiad took place 771 years before Christ. This account admirably corresponds with the scripture chronology ; for 1600 added to 771, makes 2371 ; whereas the Mosaic chronology places the flood 2348 years before Christ, a difference of only twenty-three years in a range of time so long. When we consider the erudition of Varro, and that his chronology was drawn from the Greeks and Eg^'-ptians, and came through a different channel from that of the scrip- lure, we may well be astonished at this coincidence, and can have no rational doubt of the correctness of the facts in question. 4. Seneca, the celebrated Roman philosopher and historian, is very particular on the subject of the deluge. He not only says the same things, as the above cited authors, but goes much further into the subject, assigning what were the probable causes of the flood. He moreover says, that as the world has once been destroyed by water, so it shall again "be destroyed by fire, and like a philosopher, pro- ceeds to account for the possibility, and even proba- "bility, of such an event. THE MOSAIC HISTORYa 19 5. Few men were more extensively read, or deep- ly learned in history, than Josephus, the Jewish his- torian. He affirms, that we read of the deluge and the ark in the writings of all the barbarian histo- rians; and that all the eastern nations were uniform in their belief of that article of the Mosaic history. G. Vossius says, that a tradition prevails among the Chinese, that Puoncuus with his family, escaped from the universal deluge, and was the restorer of the human race. The same is also stated by father Martinus, the Jesuit, who was a resident in Chma, and who says, that all the ancient writers of the Chinese history, speak largely of the flood. Even among the Indians of North and South America, many traditions of a general deluge, are said to prevail. 7. We shall close this enumeration of authors, with the great and respectable names of Strabo, Plato and Plutarch, all of whom express their belief in a gen- eral deluge. Plutarch, particularly, says, that Deu- calion, when the waters of the flood were abating, sent forth a dove, which returned with an olive leaf in her mouth. It may indeed be said, that he copied this from the history of Moses; in reply to which, we only need answer, if so, then he doubtless gave credit to that history. Many more testimonies might be adduced on this subject ; but from those already stated, those who are disposed to tax the history of Moses in this article with falshood or absurdity, may see something of the nature of the controversy, in which they are engaged. It is thought by many, that the heathen mythology deciphered, is but the history of Noah and his sons, and the original dispersion of their families. Sa- turn, whom mythology declares to be the father of gods and men, they say, was Noah ; and Jupiter, the son of Saturn, was Ham, the son of Noah. Plato affirmed, that Saturn VIEW OP THE than the genealogy of the patriarchs, together with a brief account of the vices of the antediluvians, and of the ruin which they incurred. The first dawn of the light of civil history, extends not beyond the foundation of the ancient kingdom of Babylon, or Assyrian empire ; and even there, it shines with faint and dubious beam. Nimrod laid the foundation of the city and of the kingdom of Babylon. The beginning of his king- dom, saith the sacred historian, was Babel, and Erech, and Accad, and Calneh, in the land of Shi- nar. Nimrod was the son of Cush, grandson of Ham, and great grandson of Noah. The era, in which the foundation of this first of empires was laid, is fixed, by the concurrence of most chronologers, in the year of the world 1800, about a century and a half after the deluge, and 2204 years before the birth of Christ. There is nothing known respecting the character and government of Nimrod, excepting what we find in the writings of Moses ; and the account there given is very concise. He is called a mighty hunter, and is said to have had a kingdom, the beginning of which was Babel, or Babylon. The probability is, that Ham and his sons, who founded Babylon and Egypt, early rebelled against Noah, the great patri- archal head and natural chief of the whole race ; whereupon Noah, and such of his descendants as adhered to him, moved eastward, crossing Persia, India and China,* to avoid the fury of this unnatural rebellion. Noah would be most likely to emigrate, or to settle, with one of his sons, on whom his prophetic bene- diction rested, and especially with Shem, whom he considered in the line of the Messiah. Elam, the eldest son of Shem, settled in Persia, and it is highly probable, that Noah himself went still further east. The great antiquity of the Chinese empire, their original character ao^ maoners, and the peculiarity ASSYRIAN EMPIRE. 41 of their language, both written and spoken, are pnbofs, tliat they are one of the most ancient nations and governments, and that their founders were among the wisest of the human race. To this, if we add the abundance of their traditions concerning the flood, and of things which with little alteration will apply to Noah and to him only, we can scarcely doubt, that either that patriarch, or some of his descendants Dear his time, founded that empire. To all this, if we add the silence of Moses' history concerning Noah after the flood, we shall be confirmed in the belief, that he actually retired from Western Asia, the gen- eral scene of that history ; and, for reasons equally strong, shall see no room to conjecture, that he moved northward into the cold inhospitable wilds of Europe. That region was left to be explored and settled by some of his more hardy, enterprising sons. The career of government began with simple mon- archy. It was no doubt first suggested, by the au- thority, which nature gives the parent over his child : for, no sooner did, experience show the utility of combiiiing the strength of a multitude in one exer- tion, than the importance of a centre of union, was seen. To give energy and system to any combina- tion, to render it durable, wieldy and effective, there must be a directing head* A discerning ambitious man, clothed with patri- archal authority, might soon see numberless ways of extending his prerogative, and strengthening the nerves of his power. Indeed, before parental autho- •' was amenable to a higher court, it is not easy to ct.- xive of a monarchy more unlimited. In a num- ber of particular families, the chief of each house would form a subordinate rank : they would naturally give place to the heads of tribes, and each of them unite in one patriarch, or grand chief. Such, proba- bly, was Nimrod. By what other means, less lauda- ble, he raised himself to power, is only matter of conjecture. 4* 42 VIEW OF THE We have already said, that Nimrod's achievements are not particularly known. He first employed his arms successfully against wild beasts, and became, as Moses stiles him, a mighty hunter. He next made war upon his own species, and founded his empire in blood. But we remain ignorant of the extent of his dominions, or the duration of his reign. His son and successor was Ninus, whose name, together with that of Semiramis, is rendered famous by the exploits they are said to have done. Ninus built the city of Nineveh, which is said to have been 60 miles in circumference, inclosed by a wall 100 feet high, and fortified with 1500 towers 200 feet high. Ninus engaged in many wars, and enlarged his do- minions on every side, particularly eastward; for he is said to have led armies into India. Semiramis, his queen, who survived him many years, and reign- ed in great glory, rendered her name immortal, by an extraordinary course of splendid actions. Many superb structures and works of magnificence about Babylon, are ascribed to her ; in the building of which she employed two millions of men. If historians deserve credit, ancient Babylon was the noblest city ever built by man. It stood on a fertile and beautiful plain, watered by the river Eu- phrates, which passed through the midst of the city. Its walls, which were carried to the astonishing height of 360 feet, were 87 feet in thickness^ and inclosed an exact square, whose side r*ras 15 miles; so that the city was 60 miles in circuit. There were fifty grand streets, that is, twenty-five running each way, on right lines parallel to each other. They were 160 feet wide, and crossing each other at right angles, they all terminated in four streets, which lay round next to the wall on every side of the city, 200 feet wide. Thus the city was laid into 676 squares of 100 rods on each side. These squares were lined with numberless edifices beside houses generally three or four stories high ; and within the squares ASSYRIAN EMPIRE, 43 were innumerable delightful plantations ; pleasure grounds and gardens. But this must be understood of the city rather as it was in the days of Nebuchad- nezzar, or Nitocris his daughter-in-law, than as it was in the days of Semiramis. Though the city stood on a plain, yet the celebrat- ed hanging gardens overlooked the walls. They raised a square of buildings four hundred feet on each side, internally supported by arches raised on arches, and without by a massy wall many yards in thickness. These works were carried up to the height of the wall, and over all a platform was laid four hundred feet square, formed by flat stones of an amazing size, over which were layers of reeds, then bricks cemented, and plates of lead, and then the earth fo,r the garden, in such thickness as to support trees of the largest size. They were watered by an engine from the bed of the Euphrates. Brevity forbids, that we give a description of the tower of Babel, forty rods square at the bottom, and upwards of 600 feet high, or the moat which encompassed the walls, the bridge over the Euphrates, the pala- ces and the subterraneous ways. Many of these wonderful edifices, are supposed to have been built by Semiramis. She carried her arms far 'lutq Ethiopia, and stil< farther into India, where she was at last defeated with a total over- thiow by an Indian king. These early conquests were far different, Doth in their nature and conse- quences, Irom those afterwards made by the Greeks and Romans. They were more easily gained and lost. Indeed, the progresses made by Semiramis, Sesostris, and others, through Asia and Africa, were little more than excursions of discovery. They moved at the head of an immense multitude, without order, or much resistance, and lived upon rapine and hunting. In these times, not only fortification, but the military art, was unknown. Of course, wher« ever they went, they carried conquest ; which was 44 VIEW OF THE ASSYRIAN EMPIRE. generally holden by no other band of security, than the weak and savage state of the conquered. But the accounts we have of those early times, are, in sundry respects, exaggerated, especially with regard to the greatness of their cities and conquests. Herodotus affirms, however, that Babylon maintain- ed her conquests 500 years. Serniramis after a reign of 42 years, abdicated her gnvernment to her son JNinyas. Few females have been moie famous for their masculine virtues. Per- haps no one ever stood higher on the list of heroes and conquerors. As to those virtues, which beautify and adorn the female character, historians have little to say of her. Ninyas succeeded his mother. In what year of the city, it is not ascertained ; nor is it a matter of consequence, since, from this period, the history of the Assyrian empire, is utterly lost for more than a thousand years. Tradition has scarcely reported the names of the succeeding monarchs. They were ex- traordinary for nothing, but luxury, sloth, idleness and the most horrid tyranny. The provinces of the empire, during that period, had little more than a mere nominal subjection to those detestable tyrants ; probably for the most part, none at all; and without doubt, the pomp of univer- sal empire, was generally confined to the proud capi- tals Babylon and Nineveh. The Trojan war took place some time after the middle period of the Assy- rian empire; but Homer makes no mention of the Assyrian greatness ; a fact, which, had it existed, could not have escaped his pervading mind, nor wanted a place in his historical, gec.graphical and martial poem. As the universal conquests of Sesos- tris, king of Egypt, are said to have happened a little before the Trojan war, Babylon and Nineveh must have lain central m his sweep of conquest, and it is not likely, he passed them by, but that his eastern career of victory, was begun by the reduction of those THE ASSYRIAN EMPIRE. 45 proud cities. Would he go to the conquest of India, and leave the Assyrian empire in his rear, powerful, independent and hostile ? The misfortune of the case is, that the glory and conquests of Sesostris, are as dubious, as those of the Assyrians; and they certainly could not have existed together. The Assyrian em- pire, first and last, was probably less in fact, than it» is in history. CHAPTER V. THE ASSYRIAN EMPIRE, TROM THE REIGN OF NINYAS TO THE FALL OF NINEVEH. THE successors of Ninyas, the s^ of Semiramis, are little known in history. The seat of their gov- ernment, or rather of their enormities, was alter- nately at Babylon and Nineveh. About 1450 years after the empire was founded by Nimrod, we find Sardanapalus reigning at Nineveh. If we may sup^ pose, that the line of succession was unbroken, from the warlike Semiramis to him, than which nothing is more probable, he was the last of that degenerate race of kings. From the silence of Homer, from the power and conquests of the kings of Egypt, from the figure Amraphel, king of Shinar, made in the days of Abraham, as stated in Genesis, and from the profound oblivion of the Assyrian history during so long a time, it is probable, that the Assyrian monarchy was broken, dissolved, perhaps annihilated, and that it must have undergone revolutions, exterminating wars, and petty tyrannies, at various times. However that may be, in the time, and during the reign, of Sardanapalus, history seems a little to emerge from darkness. That prince, being rendered weak and despicable by his vices, Arbaces, governor of Media, and Belesis, goyernor of Babylon, rebelled 46 THE ASSYRIAN ExMPIRE. against him, defeated him in battle, and drove him into his capital, where he is said to have destroyed his treasures, and burned himself to death. The result of this rebellion was the dismember- ment of the Assyrian empire. The province of Me- dia gained its liberty. A king, by the name of Ninus the younger, was established in Nineveh, and Belesis, one of the conspirators, became master of Babylon, as a separate kingdom. He is called in history, Nabonassar. The beginning of the reign of Nabonassar, which was 747 years before Christ, is supposed to be the first era, from whence the line of civil history can be with certainty drawn. Nabonassar was contempo- rary with Jotham king of Judah, and his era com- menced within six years of the founding of Rome. This revolutidn, although it rent the Assyrian em- pire in pieces, neither impaired the splendor nor magnificence of Nineveh or Babylon. Those cities now became the seats of independent princes, and distinct empires; and doubtless derived benefit from their new masters. But neither the history of the one, nor the other, is entirely known. From Nabo- nassar to the final subversion of the empire by Cyrus, was 210 years; during which period, considerable light is thrown on the subject, by the sacred writings. Concerning two important circumstances, we shall notice, first, the repeated irruptions of the Assyrian kings into Judah and Israel, and their depredations on the neighboring nations; and secondly, their car- rying away Judah and Israel into captivity. We are told, 2 Kings, xv. 19, that Pul, king of As- syria, came into the land of Israel, and Menahem gave hiin a thousand talents of silver, to conciliate his favor and protection. That this was a powerful invasion, we need no other proof, than the pricp with which the Assyrian king was bought off. This inva» sion, however, was 24 years before the era of Nabo- nassar. THE ASSYRIAN EMPIRE. 47 Nabonassar, after a reign of twelve years, was suc- ceeded by his son Merodach-Baladan, of whom little is known. This prince was in friendship with the Jews, and sent an embassy to congratulate king He- zekiah on the recovery of his health. From this period, the history of Babylon disappears, till the time of its union with Nineveh, under the govern- ment of Esarhaddon. But, in the mean time, the Assyrian kings of Nineveh were generally hostile and formidable to the nation of Israel. Tiglath-Pileser, the first king of Nineveh after the partition of the empire, was called in by Ahaz, king of Judah, to assist him against the kings of Syria and Israel. He came with a powerful army, and put a period to the kingdom of Syria, by taking Damascus, its chief city. He severely scourged the kingdom of Israel, whose dissolution now drew nigh; and proved a costly and dangerous ally to Judah, Ahaz being obliged to rob the temple of its sacred treasures, to appease his avarice. An account of this is given, 2 Kings, xvi. 7. This was in the year 740, B. C. About 20 years afterwards, Shalmaneser invaded and subdued Israel. He besieged Samaria, the capi- tal of the kingdom, three years ; at length took it, and carried the ten tribes into captivity, and planted them in Media. This event happened about 250 years after the separation of Israel from Judah. From this captivity, the ten tribes never returned. The probability is, that they soon mingled with other na- tions, lost all distinction of origin, and will emerge to light no more. The inventive imaginations of theo- rists have discovered traces of them among the Turks, Tartars, American savages, and elsewhere. But when we consider the chararter of the ten tribes, their proneness to idolatry, and to incorporate with other nations, which, in their most pure and virtuous times, could not be prevented by their wisest legisla- tors, even when they were a distinct and independent nation ; when we consider the revolutions, tyrannies, 48 THE ASSYRIAN EMPIRE. barbarity, and ignorance of Asiatic tribes in all ages * when we consider the great len^ h of time, and other auxiliary circumstances, we are strongly led to this conclusion; still allowing full weight and authoritj^ to ancient scripture prophecy, from which nothing certain on this subject can be discovered. After a reign of fourteen years, Shalmaneser died, and was succeeded by his son Sennacherib. An ac- count of his formidable invasion of Judah, in the reign of Hezekiah is particularly related, 2 Kings, xviii. 13. He invaded Judah with a powerful army; in the mean time defeated the king of Egypt, who was coming to relieve the Jews, and would have probably taken Jerusalem; but his army was suddenly destroyed by pestilence. He returned to Nineveh, where he played the tyrant with so high a hand, that his own sons assassinated him in the temple of Nisroch ; and iie was suceeded in his throne by Esarhaddon. During the reign of this prince, the royal familj'^ of the kings of Babylon became extinct, and there was an interregnum of 8 years: the weak and disordered state occasioned by this, enabled Esarhaddon, who was a wise and politic prince, to annex Babylon to his dominions. Thus, after a separation of 67 years, these two powerful kingdoms again became one : but this union, together with its happy fruits, was of short duration. The final destiny of Nineveh was now fast approaching: a rival power was rising to maturity, and ready to burst, with utter destruction, upon that proud empire. Esarhaddon, thirteen years after the union of Ba- bylon with Nineveh, was succeeded by his son Na- buchodonosor.* This prince defeated and slew Phra- ortes, king of the Medes, in a great battle, and took Ecbatana, the capital of Media. This defeat, how- ever, did not check the martial spirit or rapid growth of that warlike nation. It was left for the sons of * " Nabuchodonosor was a name among the Babylonians com- monly given to their kings, as that of Pharaoh was among the Egyptians." — Prideaux. THE ASSYRIAN EMPIRE. 49 the victors and vanquished to act the last scene, and conclude the drama ol" the first of the eastern empires. Cyaxares I. the son and successor of Phraortes, was soon at the head of a numerous and well appoint- ed army. Determining to revenge the death of his father, he marched directly into Assyria, encountered and defeated an army thrown in his way, and imme- di 'Jelj invested Nineveh, He would probably have taken it, but was obliged to raise the siege, and march in haste to defend his own territories. The Scythians, a race of warlike savages, inhabiting the wilds of Europe and Asia, had driven before them the Cim- merians, a people equally savage, and nearly as terri- ble, dwelling near the Palus Meotis. These, in num- berless hordes, were depopulating (he fertile fields of Asia, and had invaded the dominions of Cyaxares. The Medes were defeated by them in several battles, and the Scythians remained masters of most coun- tries between the Caspian, Black and Mediterranean Seas, a great part of Upper Asia,* for several years. We shall speak more particularly of them in our review of the Persian empire. While the king of Media was wagino^ doubtful war with the Scythians, Nabopollassar, governor of Baby- lon, revolted from the king of INineveh, and set up an independent government. In this he was encour- aged by Cyaxares, who had not changed his purpose of subduing Nineveh. Saracus, king of Nineveh, although menaced by such potent enemies, adopted no efficient system of defence; but, dissolved in luxury, and lost to all sense of glory, he supinely waited the gathering storm. Cyaxares at length rid himself of the Scythian in- vaders, by a stroke of policy, which nothing but the emergency of the times, and manners of the age, could warrant. He invited the chief officers of the Scythian army to a general feast, prepared in various parts, where, in the midst of mirth and intoxication, * Upper Asia included Armenia, Pontus, Colchis and Iberia. — Ed. 5 so THE ASSYRIAN EMPIRE. his guards, and others appointed for that purpose, fell furiously upon them and killed them all, without resistance. Cyaxares once more invaded the Assyrian empire, assisted by Nebuchadnezzar,* king of Babylon. These two powerful princes accomplished the final subversion and abolition of the first Assyrian empire. Nineveh was taken and destroyed. A sublime description is given of the fall of this ancient city by the prophet Nahum. From that also, we may form some idea of its greatness and splendor. This event happened B.C. 600, and in the 147th year of Nabonassar's era. The Assyrian empire rose, flourished, and fell, while the world was yet in its infancy. Few maxims of its government have reached our times; few inci- dents have escaped oblivion ; and those which have, are doubtless tinctured with the stream of tradition, passing through long and bewildering tracts of time. From what we can gather from such dubious lights, we are led to conclude, that the fabric of the ancient monarchical governments, was very simple. It may be expressed in few words, sovereign power, and absolute subjection. Where the monarch chanced to be an amiable character, the condition of the subject was very tolerable ; but power so unrestrained, in the hands of a bad man, produced the most dreadful tyranny. In every form of government, sovereign power must be lodged somewhere. Power, considered merely as corporeal strength, is naturally, in the hands of every man, nearly alike ; and the machine of government is a device, by which the power of many is combined and called forth by consent, in one great exertion. To call forth and exert this combination, the monaich has the sole powe/. He therefore can do whatever all his people, collectively, can do. His will directs their whole strength. In mixed governments, espe- cially in republics, this national exertion is obtained, * Nebuchadnezzar was the son of Nabopollassar. — Ed, THE ASSYRIAN EMPIRE. . 51 not by the will of one, but of many, who are chosen by the people for that purpose. But in this latter case, individuals commonly find means to obtain the« real, while, in the former, the monarch often holds only the nominal sovereignty. The splendor and greatness of Nineveh, as of all other great cities in early times, consisted chiefly in their public buildings. The dwellings of the great mass of the people, were little better than wretched hovels— without, unornamented, and within, unfur- nished. Indeed, this is still the case in most of the great cities of Asia. Nineveh and Babylon contained little worthy of notice, except their walls, towers, temples, palaces, and superb structures of royalty. How incomparably more magnificent are the modern cities of London or Paris, when viewed as the abodes of men. Here are seen, monuments of every art and science ; the astonishing effects of commerce ; opu- lence and independence reigning among all classes ; the diffusion of knowledge; the reign of science, freedom and plenty. The private houses of modern cities appear to be the residence of a free people, enjoying no small portion of wealth, independence and happiness. CHAPTER VI. THE ASSYRIAN EMPIRE, FROM THE DESTRUCTION OF NIN- EVEH TO THE TAKING OF BABYLON, BY CYRUS. BABYLON now remained unrivalled, and alone. The city consisted of a mighty assemblage of the most amazing structures, temples, towers, palaces and walls — works of incredible labor and expense, where millions had toiled, and groaned in painful servitude. These buildings were rather admirable for their stu- pendous greatness, than for elegance and due propor- tion in architecture. As for the rules and propoiv tioos ix). building, they were in a great measure im- 52 THE ASSYRIAN EMPIRE. known, and the different orders of architecture were yet to be discovered. They had nothing comparable with the temple of Minerva or of Balbec. For the noble science of architecture, the world is indebted to the strong and mathematical genius and elegant taste of the ancient Greeks. Nebuchadnezzar was now on the throne of Baby- lon ; and the extent of his dominions was answerable to the splendor of his capital. But there were two cities, whose fame and opulence rendered them ob- jects worthy of his ambition : one was Jerusalem, the other was Tyre ; the latter of which was one of the strongest cities then known. The siege of Jerusalem employed him two years; which, however, he at length terminated, by the utter destruction of that noble city. In the nineteenth year of his reign, he burnt Solomon's temple and carried the Jews to Babylon ; where they remained 70 years. Four years after, he hesiegfid the city of Tyre; the reduction of which was the most arduous enterprise of his life. Tyre had stood, from its foundation, 660 years ; having never been taken by any foreign power. After the Chaldean army had suffered incredible hardships, and consumed 13 years in infinite labors, the city v»'as taken ; not, however, till the inhabitants had removed their principal effects to an island, about half a mile from the shore. Here a new city rose, which soon eclipsed the glory of the former; a striking proof of the power of commerce. This new Tyre still flourished, and even far trans- cended its former state. When attacked by Alex- ander the Great, nearly three centuries afterwards, it was able to resist the impetuous valor and unri- valled skill of tliat great commander; nor is it prob- able, he ever could have taken it, but by making himself master of the sea. Of this siege, we shall speak hereafter. Nebuchadnezzar reigned prosperously 43 years. Something of his history and character may be coU THE ASSYRIAN EMPIRE. 53 iected from the sacred writings. He found no equal annong the neighboring contemporary princes; he extended his conquests far and wide; was the great- est monarch of his time, and doubtless the greatest that ever ruled the Assyrian empire. Babylon had now seen the zenith of its glory, and was soon to suffer a final and total eclipse. Four princes in succession, after Nebuchadnezzar, are re- membered only to perpetuate their infamy, and to merit the just reproach of bringing ruin on themselves and people. Evil-Merodach, Nebuchadnezzar's son and successor, was taken off by insurrection. He was succeeded by Neriglissar, his brother-in-law. This prince was soon slain by the armies of the Modes and Persians. His successor, Laborosoar- chod, still more infamous, reigned only nine months, and fell by conspiracy. To him succeeded Belshaz- zar, in whose reign Babylon was taken by Cyrus. This great city, justly considered as impregnable to every open and direct attack, was taken by strata- gem ; which we shall relate in speaking of the Modes and Persians. Belshazzar was surprised in the midst of a public feast — was slain in the gate of his palace; and the kingdom of Babylon became extinct, being the last branch of the ancient Assyrian empire, 210 years after its separation from Nineveh. Thus ended the second Assyrian empire, having subsisted, in various forms, 1668 years from the days of Nimrod. Babylon, however, still the noblest of all cities, about twenty years after it was taken by Cyrus, revolted from Darius Hystaspes, then in the fifth year of his reign, and made preparations for a long and desperate resistance ; but was agjain taken by stratagem. Zopyrus, the general of Darius, suf- fering his nose and ears to be cut off, fled into the city, pretendedly as a deserter. His military skill soon procured him a command in the city ; he open- ed the gates and let in the Persian army« A traitor should be suspected, but never trusted. Alexander 5* 54 THE ASSYRIAN EMPIRE. intended to have made Babylon his capital. It only furnished him with an untimely grave. It has been desolated for many ages ; the pleasant country around it becoming a morass by the overflowing of the Euphrates, its place is not exactly known -* and it has lain wholly desolate, and without inhabitant, from generation to generation — literally fulfilling the predictions of Isaiah the prophet. The ancient Assyrian empire, exclusive of its ex- tensive conquests, comprehended much of wliat is now called Turkey in Asia: territories lying about the rivers Euphrates and Tigris. It stretched north- ward towards the Caspian and Black Seas, with a dubious boundary on Circassia; west and north-west it spread towards the Mediterranean Sea, and met Syria and Palestine ; south and south-west lay the Persian gulf and Arabia ; and east, the ancient Media and Persia; though, indeed, all these territories and many more, were at times, subjugated to that mon- archy. In glancing an eye at the rise and fall of the ancient nations, it would be highly useful and inter- esting, could we develop, with certainty, the sources of their prosperity, and the causes of their fall. But if this inquiry is attended with inexplicable difficul- ties in instances the most recent, how remote from investigation is it in the first governments which ever existed? National prosperity may be considered in two points of light : 1 . When a nation, considered as a body, is powerful, respected, rich, and eminent in the view of surrounding nations : or 2. When a na- tion is in such a state, that the individuals, who com- pose it, are prosperous, happy, and secure. In some instances these two kinds of national pros- perity h^ve united for a lime ; but those instances have beep rare, and that union, of short continuance. * It is supposed, that the place and ruins of ancient Babylon have been recently discovered. See H^llah in Worcester's Uri!= versal Gazetteer. — Ed. . PERSIA. 55 History presents many examples of the first. Such, indeed, were all the ancient monarchies ; such was the empire of Constantine the Great, of Charlen^agnc, of Ghenghis Khan, of Charles V. of Louis XIV. — and we might come still nearer our time. But what histories shall we consult to find examples of the second ? If we judge from the most prohai>le sources of conjecture, concerning individual happiness, in those empires of most splendid figure in history, our conclusions will not be very favorable. Where mil- lions are subject to the control and arbitrary direction of one, however good may be his intention, yet he will err, through vanity, through weakness, through pas- sion ; but, above all, throughi gnorance. Vainly rely- ing on his own sagacity, prudence and foresigfit, he will use his power to its extent; he will form designs, and strike into projects, in the compass of which, the rights, if not the lives, of thousands and millions, will be crushed, and their sighs and groans never heard. But nothing is more uncertaiji, than any compari- son we can make of the happiness of nations ; for in all governments, sovereign power must be exercised by certain hands, either hereditary or elective ; and as all men are ambitious of power, it is a question, what form of government contains the most of pri- vate happiness. If popular governments are more equitable, they are, at the same time, most feeble, most liable to convulsions, and revolutions, and of shortest duration- CHAPTER VII. MEDIA AND PERSIA. THE PERSIAN EMPIRE, FROM ITS FOUNDATION TO THE BIRTH OF CYRUS. THE Medes and Persians are considered as the descendants of Shcm, the son of Noah, and of the family of Elam. There is little known of that great 50 P.ERSIA, and powerful people, but from Herodotus, Xenophon* and the sacred writings. Their empire, in its full extent, extended from India to Ethiopia, and from the waters of India and Arabia to the Caspian and Black Seas. It was with them, as it was with all the great ejnpires of ancient times; their boundaries were fre- quently dubious, and always varying. Indeed, the present empire of Russia is a similar instance, the emperor himself, and his ministers, scarcely knowing its real limits and extent^ for which there is good reason : their boundaries may be compared to those places, where the land and sea dispute for empire, and prevail by turns. Their subjection is but nomi- nal ; and such is their distance from the seat of gov- ernment, so wild and ferocious their manners, that correct intelligence can hardly keep pace with the rapidity of their revolutions. Tho Assyrian empire, the centre of which was about the river Euphrates, early subjugated all the different tribes and nations, from the river Indus to the isthmus of Suez. Of course the Persian territo- ries were included. But before the revolt of Media from that empire, the history of the Medes and Per- sians, is unknown, it has been already noticed, that Arbaces, governor of Media, taking advantage of the weak administration of Sardanapalus, king of Assyria, formed a conspiracy, and concentrated a combination of powers against him, which proved his overthrow, and the dismemberment of his kingdom. Babylon, Nineveh, and Media became distinct and independent governments.* Of the history of the * The opinion of Prideaux, that Nineveh and Media remained united under Arbaces, appears much more probable. " The an- cient empire of the Assyrians, which had governed Asia above thirteen hundred years, being dissolved, there arose up two em- pires in its stead, the one founded bj Arbaces, governor of Media, and the other by Belesis, governor of Babylon ; — Belesis had Ba- bylon, Chaldea and Arabia, and Arbaces all the jest.*" Prideaux' CqnftCQtion, Vol. I. p. 1. — Ed. PERSIA. 57 two former, wo have drawn the outline : indeed, lit- tle more has escaped oblivion, and reached our times. While those great powers were going to decay, the Medes and Persians, like most nations in their youth, acquired a military spiiit ; and being uncorrupted \yith luxury and vice, they adopted happy methods of discipline and internal order, which could not fail of giving energy to their counsels, and succi;ss and renown to their arms. Some time after the separation of Media from the Assyrian empire, Dejoces, a powerful chief of that country, erected it into a monarchy. He was a wise and politic prince. His character is highly celebrat- ed by Herodotus and others. It is worthy of remark, that most nations, in the tirst of their career, are led and ruled by great and good men. We might in- stance Romulus* and Numa in Rome; Themistocles, Aristides, Lycurgus, Solon, Epaminondas, in Greece ; Cyrus, in Persia ; David and Solomon, in Judea ; and in later times, Charlemagne, in France; Alfred, in England ; and we may add, Washington, in America. Dejoces employed a long reign of more than fifty years, in civilizing his subjects promoting the arts of peace, and reducing to practice an excellent system of policy, and thereby shewing himself worthy to reign. He left behind him a grateful memorial in the minds of his subjects, and a son and successor of a warlike, ambitious and enterprising temper. Phra- ortes succeeded bis father in the kingdom of Media. Few circumstances are recorded of him. He carried on Wars with various success ; subjected tlie Persians to his power; made war with Nabuchodonosor, the king of Nineveh, in which he was unfortunate, and terminated his carrer, together with his life, after a reign of twenty-two years. * Some of these characters are by no means to be ranked among the s:ooem from his dominions. He is said to have caused them to be invited to a feast, made in various parts of his king- dom, where, in the midst of intoxication, his guards, and other emissaries, fell upon them, and caused them to perish in a general massacre. The difficul- ties, however, attending so extensive and deep a conspiracy, leave room to doubt the authenticity of the story. Cyaxares at length found leisure to renew his in- vasion of Nineveh. He met with little obstruction in opening the siege ; and as his efforts werg aided by the king of Babylon, a powerful and warlike prince, with whom he had formed an alliance, the reduction of the city soon followed, as we ha o formerly noted. Cyaxares pursued his conquests, leaving only Chal- dea to the king of Babylon ; and having extended his territories, and enriched his armies with treasures and spoils of inimense value, he returned to Media in great glory ; where the enervating influence of the Assyrian luxury soon became visible, and, among other causes, concurred in transferring the empire from the Medes to the Persians. Cyaxares was succeeded by his son Astyages, ■whose reign was long and prosperous. He had a daughter whose name was Mandane, who married Cambyses, king of Persia. His son Cyaxares suc- ceeded him in his Median territories. Of Cambyses and Mandane, was born the great Cyrus, who put a period to the latter Assyrian, and effected the union of the Median and Persian, empires. PERSiA. 6 1 CHAPTER VIII. THE PERSIAN EMPIRE, FROM THE BIRTH OF CYRUS T.O THE CONQUEST OF THE LESSER ASIA. THE legal heir to a splendid fortune, or to an im- perial throne, has little honor in comparison with him, who, by the force of his genius, breaks the power of depressing circumstances, bears down all impedi- ments, removes the various difficulties and embar- rassments, with which weak men are encompassed, and carries along with him, a whole nation to the elevated summit of empire. However much we may be disposed to ascribe it to a fortunate concurrence of events, it will appear, on careful attention, to arise from that astonishing power, some men have over others, of combining and directing their exertions to proper objects — from their great energy of character — from their commanding and comprehensive views of human affairs — from their quick discernment in the choice of expedients — from their bold and mas- terly projection of grand schemes, and from their dili- gence and perseverance in every pursuit. With such a genius, Cyrus was endowed. He found his native country but small, and inhabited by an inconsiderable people. The territories of the ancient Persians, it is said by good authorities, com- prehended but a small part of that vast country now bearing their name ; which extends from the river Indus to the Euphrates. They were allies and de- pendants of the Medes, who, under Cyaxares the first, the great grandfather of Cyrus, had destroyed Nine- veh, and subjugated many neighboring countries, as already noticed. West of them, lay the kingdom of Babylon, immensely opulent, and still powerful, but declining under the administration of a dynasty of weak and vicious raooarchs. 6 62 PERSIA. As the Medes had put a period to the first Assyrian empire, the Assyrians of Babylon viewed thenn with an eye of jealousy, and waited only for a convenient time to make war on so powerful and dangerous a neighbor. This soon presented; and Neriglissar, king of Babylon, having drawn into his alliance Crcesus, king of Lydia, and many neighboring princes and tributaries, took the field. Cyaxares the second, had just before this, succeeded to the throne of his father Astyages. He was alarmed at the prospect of so formidable a war, which seemed likely to overwhelm his dominions. He immediately sent to Cambyscs, king of Persia, requesting that Cyrus might be sent to his aid at the head of the Persian auxiliaries. Cyrus then first appeared as the commander of an army, and fully justified the expectations of those, who had seen his wisdom, discreetness and valor, on former occasions. He displayed all the activity, the humanity, the address, the fortitude and the personal authority of a great commander. A general battle was fought, in which the king of Babylon was slain, the Assyrian army totally defeated, their allies dis- persed, and their affairs rendered desperate. But as the victory was wholly owing to the conduct of Cy- rus, the king of Media was filled with chagrin, envy and discontent. He soon after returned home, and left Cyrus to prosecute the war at his own discre- tion. The Assyrians were unable to collect another army sufficient to cope with Cyrus. He therefore pene- trated into Chaldea, took every fortress that lay in his way, ravaged the country, and marched to the gates of Babylon. But the stupendous height and impenetrable thickness of the walls, the lofty towers, and gates of solid brass, and the multitude of men within, seemed to indicate a longer siege and more obstinate def£nce than Cyrus was prepared to under- take. Before that city could be taken, he had once more to try his fortune in the open field. PERSIA. 63 He therefore returned with his victorious army to Media, to his uncle Cyaxares ; and from thence re- visited his father Camhyses, in his native country, Persia, after an absence of about seven years. It was now pretty clearly foreseen, that Cyrus was rising to the empire of Asia. His great qualities as a general, the sublimity and grandeur of his designs, the celerity of his movements, the martial order of his camps, and the tremendous impetuosity of his battles, added to the lustre of his character in private life, presaged his future greatness, and seemed to set him foremost in the first rank of men then living; and as we shall see hereafter, entitled him to the highest character of all the monarchs of Asia. On his approach towards the borders of Media, as just related, his uncle Cyaxares met him with cool- ness. And well might he have been alarmed for the safety of his kingdom and the security of his crown, had Cyrus been of that dark, perfidious character, which many great conquerors have too clearly shewn to the world. But Cyrus had the address to dispel his fears, quiet his jealousies, and conciliate his affec- tions : so that the just apprehensions of mankind of a rupture between the Medes and Persians, were removed; Cyrus, doubtless, well understanding, how important the strict union of those tw^o warlike pow- ers was to the accomplishment of his designs, and also foreseeing, how likely it was that he should one day reign over both. The rapid growth of the Persian arms under Cy- rus, had now excited general attention from Egypt to India. A league was formed among the principali- ties of Asia, at the head of which was the king of Babylon, and Croesus, king of Lydia. But before we proceed, it is necessary to draw the reader's attention, for a moment, aside from the line we are tracing. The Lydians were an ancient people of Lesser Asia, situated between Ionia on the west, and the greater Phrygia oi\ the east. They derived 64 PERSIA. their name, from Lydus, an ancient king of that coantrj. His family, according to ancient authors, was supplanted by the descendants of Hercules, who reigned over the Lydians several centuries. After various revolutions, we find Croesus on the throne of Lydia, the prince just mentioned. He was the friend and ally of the king of Babylon, His capital was Sard is, where afterwards was situated one of the seven churches of Asia, Croesus was immensely rich, and the Lydians, though a very voluptuous, were yet a warlike, nation. This prince, notwithstanding the splendor and opu- lence of his court, and the luxurious magnificence of his kingdom, was a consummate general, as well as a proficient in the Grecian philosophy. He was per- petually engaged in wars, and made conquests and considerable additions to his dominions. It may also be proper to observe, that the Lvdians had, on for- mer occasions, engaged in wars against the Modes, and were their natural enemies, as they were the friends and allies of the Assyrians. The king of Babylon, whom no emergency of gov- ernment, or national exigence, could now^ draw from his debaucheries, had placed Croesus as the acting head of the league, to contend with Cyrus ; but, in the mean time, had furnished him with vast sums of money; had drawn a great army even from Egypt; had collected what forces he could from all Western Asia, then very populous ; and, in a word, had as- sembled an army, perhaps second to none in those times, but the army of Xerxes the Great, afterwards drawn from the same populous regions. It consisted 0/420,000 men. This army was assembled at Thym- bra, a place not far distant from Sardis, the capital of Lydia. Cyrus lost no time in collecting what forces he could. His army fell short of 200,000 ; but his chief dependence was on 70,000 Persians, whom, with his own band, he had trained to the ^rt of war, and into PERSIA. 65 whom he had infused his own invincible spirit. Con- trary to all expectation, Cyrus put his army immedi- ately into motion, and marched in quest of his ene- mies. Their distance could not be less than a thou- sand miles : it was probably more, and that through countries, inhabited by hostile nations. No difficulty could intimidate Cyrus ; no labor or danger could abate the ardor of his troops. By long and rapid marches, he soon came up to the place of rendezvous, from which Croesus had not moved, but lay in per- fect security. Celerity is the first and grandest of all military maxims. It was this which gave victory and fame to Cyrus, Alexander, Hannibal, Cesar and Napoleon. Though celerity indeed is not the only thing neces- sary ; yet, other things being as they should be, it renders invasion irresistible, and victory certain. The Assyrians were astonished at the intrepidity of Cyrus, especially considering the inferiority of his army, and distance from his own dominions. But still they placed confidence in their own resources — their superior numbers, and the military skill of their commanders. A spacious plain was chosen, on which the army of Croesus displayed a line of battle five miles in length. Their plan was to flank the Persians, and surround them, knowing their own numbers to be much superior. Cyrus, aware of this, had determin- ed that his army should act in three directions; and so sure of victory was he, that he ordered the centre of his army not to move, nor strike a blow, till he had routed the wings of the enemy. When the sig- nal for battle was given, the Persian army stood firm and profoundly silent in a line much shorter and deeper than the enemy, till the wings of the latter had wheeled round, and formed thiee sides of an encompassing square. At that instant, Cyrus wheel- ed the wings of his army, and fell with an irresistibl« shock upon the wings of the enemv: they both gave. 6* 66 PERSIA. waj and fell into confusion : that was the signal for the centre, where commenced a battle, long, fierce and bloody. A hundred and twenty thousand Egyp- tians, ranged in battalions thirty deep, in close order, and covered from head to foot with bucklers and cuirasses, formed the centre of the allied army. The horse, on which Cyrus rode, was killed; and he fell among forests of spears, and showers of javelins. How often the fate of a battle, and even of whole nations, depends on the courage and strength of a general. Nothing could bear him down ; he defend- ed himself, sword in hand, till he was rescued by his guards and remounted. This column of Egyptians stood their ground, and fought with amazing bravery, till the field was cleared of all other enemies. Cyrus then offered them honorable terms of capitulation, which they accepted, and laid down their arms. Never was victory more complete, or battle more decisive. It decided at once the fate of the Lydians, and all the nations of the Lesser Asia. As Croesus had wantonly drawn the Assyrian wa.- into his own kingdom, he now tasted the fruits of his temerity. But, determined to protract the dispute as much as possible, he collected another army, and encountered Cyrus again, with similar success. Finding all was lost, he retired into Sardis, and prepared to defend that capital against the conqueror, who now com- menced a regular siege. The city was soon reduced, and Crcesus was condemned to die ; but was repriev- ed and restored to favor, and, it is said, reinstated in his dominions, as a tributary prince. Some writers relate, that Solon, the celebrated Grecian philoso- pher, had, in the prosperous davs of Croesus, visited that prince; and that Crcesus, after shewing him the splendor of his capital and resources of his kingdom, demanded of the philosopher, whether he did not think him a happy man ? Solon answered him in the style of a Stoic, and concluded by telling him, that he could not tell whether he was happy, till he had PERSIA. 07 heard of his death. Croesus, in a rage at the free- dom and boldness of Solon, called him a fool, and ordered him out of his sight. Cyrus, in the ancient barbarous manner, when Croesus had become his prisoner, ordered him to be burned to death. He was accordingly bound on the pile, which was set on fire. While the flames were approaching the unhappy Croesu?, he suddenly re- collected the words of Solon, and being now forcibly struck with their justness, he cried oat, O Solon ! Solon! The thing was told to Cyrus, who immedi- ately demanded an explanation. Whereupon Croe- sus related to him the circumstances of his interview with Solon, and concluded by saying, that " he will now hear of my death, and will indeed pronounce me an unhappy man." Cyrus, powerfully affected with the fickleness of fortune, and the changes to which men are liable, ordered the royal captive unbound, and restored him ^to his favor. This story, however, is said by some writers to be fabulous. The voluntary submission of many states, by their ambassadors, followed the conquest of Lydia; and Cyrus had little further use for arms in that country. CHAPTER IX. THE PERSIAN EMPIRE, FROM THE RED' CTION OF ASIA MINOR, BY CYRUS, TILL ITS SUBVERSION BY ALEXANDER. FROM the conquest of Asia Minor, Cyrus directed his marclwtoward Syria and Arabia; and in a few years sawTall Western Asia subjected to his arms, Babylon alone excepted. This had, from the first, fired his ambition, and had been the ultirj.ite end of all his schemes and enterprises. With an army ade- quate to the undertaking, he now advanced towards that immense capital. He was met by the king of 1^8 PERSIA. Babylon, with a numerous army, whonn he defeated with great slaughter. The Babylonian monarch fled into the city, shut after him the massy gates, and prepared for a long and resolute defence. This siege commenced about nine years after the capture of Sardis. Cyrus immediately drew his army before the city, and commenced a series of operations, in which the whole vigor and extent of his genius were aided by the most efficient principles of the art of war, known in his day. But he had difficulties to encounter, which would have discouraged any one but himself. The Babylonians mocked and derided him from their lofty battlements; and seemed secure in a fortress, too strong to be reduced by the art of man. The height, thickness, and solidity of the walls of Babylon, rendered them impregnable to every at- tempt. On the top, they were so broad, that several chariots might run abreast: and at short distances, there were towers much higher than the walls, con- tinually filled with armed men. The gates were solid pieces of brass, of such strength and weight, as to defy all possible engines of war. The walls and towers were guarded by a numerous army ; and it was thought, with what provisions there were in the city, and what might be raised within it in the gar- dens, that the inhabitants might sustain a siege of twenty years. There is reason to doubt, whether Cyrus could have taken Babylon otherwise than by stratagem : for, after having spent nearly two years, during which time, he tried every mode of attack he could devise, he saw no prospect of success, nor any reason to expect, but that a blockade of i^ny ^^ears must be his only resort; and even that resort, ex- tremely dubious in its issue. But it is a truth, that whatever man can build, man can destroy; and it is a truth far more melan- choly, that with whatever expense, pleasure and ambition, any thing is built by one man, the time PERSIA. 69 may conle, when, with equal expense, pleasure and ambition, it will be demolished by another. His comprehensive genius, however, at length pro* jectcd a plan, by which he gained the city. At some distance above the city, had been dug an immense pit, of size sufficient to receive the waters of the river for a considerable lime. It is said to have been many miles in extent. With this lake, the river communi- cated, by canals, which were closed along the river by dikes of amazing strength. By breaking down these, the river would forsake its course, and flow into the lake. On the night of a public festival, Cyrus caused the dikes to be broken down. The river immediately turned out of its channel, which became so dry, that the Persian army marched down into it, with little difficulty, into the city; and were met by another division of the army, who had march- ed up the channel from the opposite side of the city ;. and although there was a high wall on each side of the river, yet, on that night, the gates leading to the river were generally left open. In the midst of rev- elling and drunkenness, the inhabitarits v;rrc s:.i»« prised ; and the king, hearing the uproar abroad, had only time to advance to the gate of his palace, where, fighting sword in hand, he was slain. The city and province of Babylon, without fuVthef resistance, submitted to the conqueror. Thus ended the Chaldean or Lower Assyrian empire. This event happened about fifty years after the destruction of Jerusalem by Nebuchadnezzar— 209 years from the beginning of the reign of Nabonassar, or Belesis — ■ more than 2000 years from its foundation by Nimrod, or Belus 5,, and in the year before the Christian era, i38. "' Babylon had now received an irreparable Idow. This diversion of the river continued to overflow the finest part of the adjacent country, and at length turned it into an extensive marsh, as loathsome and unhealthy, as it was useless. The current of the 70 PERSIA. liver through the city was obstructed, and the water shallow. From this period, Bahjlon experienced a rapid decay, till it was taken by Alexander the Great, aboAjt two hundred years after. Alexandt'r, with a view to make it the seat of his empire, had deter- mined to restore it to its ancient splendor ; but dying suddenly, the work ceased. His successors aban- doned that proud capital for ever, and fixed the seat of their government at Seleucia ; or, as it was called by some, New Babylon. The steps of its decline can scarcely be traced to a much later period. In the Augustan a^e, it was nearly desolate. \ About two years after the reduction of Babylon, Cyrus, by the death of his father and uncle, succeed- ed to the sovereignty of Media and Persia. His em- pire now extended from the Caspian Sea to the In- dian Ocean, and from India to Ethiopia. To relate the particulars of the reign of Cyrus, would conduce little to the general design of this work; and it would be still less conducive, and less interesting to go into many particulars concerning his successors* The fall of tbe Babylonian, and the rise of the Persian empire, present to the reader ].he first important revolution in the annals of history, whose consequences were general and permanent. Cyrus died at the age of 70 years. If we estimate his reign from his assuming .the command of the Persian and Median armies, it wai? thirty years — if from the conquest of Babylon; it was 9 years; and if from the death of bis uncle, Cyaxares, 7 years. He is represented as a prince of great abilities and great wisdom: in his council and cabinet, as distinguished for profound policy, as for bravery and good fortune, in the field. He seems to have united the happiness of his subjects with his own iilory ; thf^reby securing the prosperity of his kingdom on its surest basis. Cyrus wa* an instrument of Providence in accom- plishing the disine dcsiijns toward tlie Jews, as we f hall hereafter notice, in speaking of their history ;. PERSIA. 71 and he had the distinguished honor of being foretold, even by name, as the restorer of that chosen people.* The Persians, in every age, have been a brave, pohte, and generous people. Not even the influence of bad government, the gloomy reign of superstition, or the relaxing indolence of a mild climate, could ever debase them to a level with their neighbors. But the meridian of their glory was in the reign of Cyrus. The important revolution effected by Cyrus, and the splendor of his reign, are rendered famous in sacred history, by the restoration of the Jews, and the rebuilding of the city and temple of Jerusalem. They had been subdued and carried into captivity by Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, where they had now remained for 70 years. On the accession of Cyrus to the empire of Asia, he issued a decree for their restoration ; which, with other privileges, al- lowed them to return to Judea, to rebuild their cities, and to restor.' their worship. This decree was issued 468 years from the dedication of the temple by Solomon — 955 years from the departure of the Israelites out of Egypt, and 536 years before the Christian era. Cyrus was succeeded in his extensive empire by his son, Cambyses ; who, in a short reign of eight years, did little worthy either of the monarch of Asia, or of the great ctiaractt^r and actions of his father. He invaded E£';ypt with some success ; was guilty of many crueltirsi murdered Smcrdis, his only brother, the son of the great Cyrus. He was recalled from his Eiryptian expedition, to suppress a rebellion rais- ed by Smerdis the Maj^ian, who had usurped his throne in his absence. But on his return, as he was mounting bis horse, his sword hll out of its scabbard, and gave him a wound in the thiirh, of which he died. The Eijyptians remark, th'it it wis a judg- ment of heaven upon him, because he had wounded * Isaiah, xlv. 1, 72 PERSIA. their gpd Apis, in the same place. He had some military talents, but was remarkable only for rash- ness, pride, cruelty, and injustice. Smerdis, the usurper, being soon destroyed, was succeeded by Darius Hystaspes. After bim the or- der of succession w^as as follows, viz. Xorxes the Great, Artaxerxes, Xerxes U. Darius Mothus, Ar- taxerxes Mnemon, Ochus, Arses, Darius Codomanus. From the accession of Cyrus till the conquest of Persia by Alexander, was 223 years, their average reign being about 20 years. In looking over this period of Persian history, from Cyrus to Alexander, there is little to engage the attention. The empire was generally on the decline. The vanity and vices of the kings, who reigned from time to time, were no less conspicuous, than their dangerous effects on the empire. The former led them often to engage in wars, particularly with the Greeks; the latter rendered them unable to contend with their enemies. Their most memorable enterprise was that of Xerxes the Great. His inva- fiion of Greece was rendered famous by the greatness of his army, his dastardly conduct, total overthrow, and shameful retreat to his own dominions. Of this extraordinary expedition, a brief account shall be given. The growing power and military fame of the Greeks had, before the reign of Xerxes, excited both the jealousy and the fears of the Persian Monarchs. Xerxes, therefore, no sooner ascended the throne, than he began to meditate an invasion of Greece ; and particularly of the Athenians, for their conduct during the reign of his father. Accordingly, he levied forces from all parts of his dominions, and made extensive preparations, both by sea and land. By means of an alliance with the Carthaginians, he drpw auxiliaries even from Spain, Italy, and Gaul. The Carthagi- nians, who, at that time, had acquired an extensive military reputation, furnished him with an army of PERSIA. 73 300,000 men, under the command of Hamilcar. Af- ter the most active preparations throughout his do- minions, tributaries and alhes, he, in the sixth year of his reign, put his forces in motion, crossed the Helles- pont on a bridge of boats, and encamped his army at the city Doriscus, by the mouth of the river Hebrus; near which place he also drew together his naval armament. Here he made a general review of all his forces ; and which, according to many authors, consisted of 2,641,610 men, with upwards of 1200 ships: and to this immense multitude, says Dr. Pri- deaux, if we add all the slaves, the women, the atten- dants, &c. the number must exceed 5,000,000, proba- bly the greatest army ever brought into the field.* With this assemblage of nations, Xerxes advanced to the strait of Thermopylae, where he was met by Leonidas, king of Sparta, and about 300 Lacedemo- nians, and as many Greeks as made up about 4000 men. This handful of men defended the pass for two days, resisting every form of attack. The Greeks, however, growing weary of the unequal contest, at length all deserted Leonidas but his 300, and a few others. They stood their ground, and fought with amazing bravery, till every man was slain ; among whom was Leonidas himself. This dear-bought vic- tory cost the Persians 20,000 of their bravest men, and two of the brothers of Xerxes : nor could they be otherwise than astonished at the valor and forti- tude of the Greeks. To Leonidas the prize of valor has been allowed by all heroes, all ages and nations. Many warriors have fought merely for fame, and have laid down their lives to gratify a mad ambition. Leonidas fought for his country. He did not expect to conquer, his object was to delay the enemy's progress, till his countrymen could assume a posture of defence. This object be gained, though he fell in the conflict. * This account of Prideaux is on the authority of Herodotu^j Plutarch, and others j but Diodorus and Pliny make it les?. 7 74 PERSIA. Passing the straits of Thermopylae, the Persian army, like the progress of a slow but mighty inunda- tion, advanced toward Athens. The Athenians, hav- ing consulted the Delphian Oracle, were directed to defend themselves by wooden walls. When all were in doubt concerning the meaning of this response, says Cornelius Nepos, Themistocles, the Athenian general, told them, that the intention of the Oracle was, that they should defend themselves by ships. Accordingly, the Athenian and confederate fleet of Greece, amounting to about 300 sail, drew up in the strait of Salamis, where they encountered and totally defeated the fleets of Persia, destroying many ships, and dispersing the rest. This battle has been justly celebrated by all historians. It was gained by the masterly policy of Themistocles, who drew the Per- sians to action in a disadvantageous place, and then, by a bravery nearly as magnanimous, and more fortunate than that of Leonidas, obtained a complete victory. Xerxes now saw clearly what enemies he had to contend with; and perceiving them entire masters of the sea, he was seized with the most alarming appre- hensions for his own safety, although encompassed by millions. Leaving an army of 300,000 men with Mardonius, his general, to prosecute the war, he hast- ened back to the Hellespont, lest his bridge of boats should be destroyed, and his retreat to his own do- minions for ever cut oflT. On his arrival, as be feared, he found his bridge to have been broken by storms. Wherefore, in the utmost consternation for his safety among enemies so brave and interpid, and for the preservation of his throne, which the news of his ill fortune would expose to some aspiring rebel, he crossed the same Hellespont, which he had lately covered with his fleets and armies, in a fishing-boat, and returned home, covered with shame and infamy. Still far more complete was the defeat of that part of this great invasion conducted by Hamilcar, the Carthaginian already mentioned ; for, landing an army of 300,000 men in Sicily, he was suddenly at- PERSIA. ib tacked by Gelo, king of Sicily, as he was celebrating a public feast, and his whole army was either slain, or nnade prisoners, and liis fleet destroyed. Mardonius now only remained, to resist the concentrated forces of Greece, invincible by valor, and now formidable by numbers, although far inferior to the army of the Persians.* The Greeks, commanded by Pausanius and Aristides, pursued him now retiring out of Attica into Boeotia. They came to a general battle near Platasa, in which Mardonius was killed, and his army cntirelj' cut otF. It is remarkable, that on the same day, another battle was fought at sea, in which the Greeks were completely victorious, and the remain- der of the Persian fleet destroyed. Thus terminated the greatest expedition, found iq the annals of history. It can hardly be doubted, that, had the Greeks tarried their arms into Persia, they might, at that time, have subverted the Persian empire. Xerxes, who deserved the appellation of great^ for little reason, except the greatness of his follies and vices, employed the remainder of his reign in in- glorious wars— in superstitions destructive to learn- ing and civility, and in intrigues and atrocities, as disgraceful to his throne, as injurious to his subjects. It will be found to be a just remark, that, as most nations have risen by industry and virtue, so they have fallen by luxury, indolence and vice. When the Persians were poor, hardy, industrious, brave, and vir- tuous, they enabled Cyrus to conquer and to govern Asia. But conquest and dominion rendered them vain and secure ; wealth made them luxurious and eflTeminate ; vice made them weak and contemp- tible. They had no longer a Cyrus to lead them to victory ; or, if they had, they were no longer a peo- ple capable of rising to empire, by toil and discipline. But the Greeks themselves, not far from this period, began to feel the corrupting influence of wealth and power. Long before the conquest of Persia, they had passed the meridian of their power and glory ; nor * 140,000. 76 ^ PERSIA. could a hero spring but from the wilds of Macedon, to subdue the Pesian empire. The conquest of Persia, by Alexander the Great, will be noticed under the review of Grecian history. We shall, therefore, close this brief survey, by glanc- ing an eye at the slate of the Persian territories, sub- sequent to Alexander's conquest. It has been already noticed, that Alexander, king of Macedon, above three centuries before the Chris- tian era, in the raign of Darius Codomanus, subdued Persia, and became master of all Western Asia. At the death of Alexander, his extensive dominions were divided among the chief generals of his army. Baby- lon, together with Media and Persia, fell to Seleucus. The Seleucidas, or kings of Syria, held for a few years the empire of Persia. Some of them even marched armies across the river Indus, with a view to maintain and extend their authority. But they could not govern what Alexander could subdue; they could not even stand, where he could advance unmolested. Persia soon began to be governed by independent princes. Though under the name of Parthia, it was substantially the same. A dynasty of kings com- menced with Arsaces, about 70 years after the con- quest of Persia by Alexander, 256 years before Christ. The Arsacidae held the seat of their government nearer to Media, than to Persia. They were power- ful and warlike — were generally more than a match for the kings of Syria, and even set bounds to the Ro- man arms. Mithridates,* called the Great, was one of the most warlike monarchs of Asia. He flourished about 120 years before the Christian era ; and what is remarkable of him, he maintained a war with the Romans 40 years, and according to Cicero's own de- claration, among the enemies of Rome, was second to none but Hannibal. He was defeated by Pompey, on the plains of Pharsalia; where it is remarkable that the fate of Europe and Asia has been decided three times, by three great and memorable battles ; * This Mithridates was king of Poptus, and not of Farthia.— Ei>; PERSIA. 77 by Pompey and Mithridates, Pompey and Cesar, Tamerlane and Bajazet.* Although Pompey tri- umphed over Mithridates, yet the Parthians surviv- ed, and were powerl'ul even in the reign of Augustus. The Parthian kings of the dynasty of Arsaces were still powerful, when the Romans began to decline. While the wretched and effeminate Heliogabalus reigned in Rome, about 223 years after Christ, Arta- banes, the thirty-second king of the Arsacidae, was deposed by Artaxerxes, in whom, it is said, the an- cient Persian monarchy was restored. The Persians, properly speaking, then flourished ; having like a phoenix, risen from the ashes of the ancient empire; and the names of Sapor, Hormisdas, and Chosroes, make a figure in history, and were famous in their times, while the Roman empire was in its decline, and after its overthrow by the Goths and Vandals. The dynasty of Artaxerxes flourished about 400 years, under twenty-five kings, until Jesdegirdes, in the year of Christ 632, was deposed and slain by the followers of Mahomet. They held the government of that country, till conquered by Tamerlane, the great cham of Tartary, in 1396. Since that time the Persians have had various masters, and some very bad ones, and have undergone numerous revolu- tions. We have seen little of the Persian history during the middle ages. From all we can learn, they must have fared better than the Roman empire ; and if we except China, no nation has stood its ground through all ages, better than Persia. The Persians probably experienced their ultimate point of depression before the Christian era ; they certainly were powerful, when Rome fell ; and, though conquered by Mahomet's followers, and by Tamerlane, they have been able to resist some of the most powerful and warlike nations of modern times, the Turks and Russians. *Tamerl£nie defeated Bajazet near Ancona in Asia Minor,^at a considerable distance from Pharsalia. — Ed. 7* 73 ANCIENT GREECE. CHAPTER X. ikNCIENt GREECE, FROM THE EARLIEST TIMES TO THE LEGISLATION OF LYCURGUS. To unite perspicuity with brevity, in drawing the great line of Grecian history, will be difficult; es- pecially if we regard separately the states and colo- nies, the traditional history of each, their high an- tiquity, and their various alliances, wars, and revolu- tions. The history of this wonderful people, is better known than that of those who went before them, and is surely of much greater importance. To their surprising genius, the world is indebted, in a mea- sure, for the knowledge of the arts and sciences. In architecture, sculpture, poetry and oratory, and in the arts and sciences necessary to the perfection of those branches, they stand unrivalled. We may say of them, they invented, improved, and perfected.. They so far perfected, that they have never been excelled. The territories of ancient Greece seem to have possessed every advantage which situation, soil and climate, can give a nation. Comprehending what is now called Turkey in Europe, they were skirted northwardly by German and Scythian nations ; east- wardly lay the Black Sea, the strait of Bosphorus^ the Hellespont, and the Archipelago ; southwardly their country was washed by the Mediterranean, and west by the Adriatic or Gulf of Venice. A narrow sea separated them eastward ly from the shores of Lesser Asia, where Troy once flourished ; which, together with many rich provinces, became Greciaij colonies. Their climate, which was anciently some- what more cool than it is now, was salubrious, their sky generally serene, their air pure, and their soil fruitful. Their lofty mountains and rugged hills, the Tariety in the face of their country, the abundance ANCIENT GREECE, 79 and purity of their springs and rivulets, and all in a climate and soil so fine and genial, formed an inri- mense variety of wild and charming prospects, in which sublimity and beauty were united. No country was ever better calculated to promote and reward industry, to foster genius, to fire imagi- nation, or to rouse the mind to exertion. The prox- imity of seas, and a variety of excellent harbors, early prompted the Greeks to a spirit of naval enter- prise, and enabled them to realize the benefits of ex- tensive commerce, wealth, knowledge, and politeness. The country of ancient Greece, was inhabited more than eighteen centuries before the Christian era : but for a thousand years of that period, its his- tory is not only traditional but fabulous, and for the most part utterly incredible. The Grecian fables and traditions, brought down from the heroic age, far excel every thing else of the kind. Nothing, indeed, can be more absurd, false and ridiculous, than most of them are; yet the glowing imagination of the Greeka has rendered them an interesting part of Grecian literature to the classical scholar. But as the rela- tion of them would not consist with the brevity of this work, so neither would it increase its utility. In- deed, as this historical sketch is designed to follow the course of empire, our w^ork would hardly strike into the history of Greece, till near the conquest of Persia by Alexander. The commonwealth of Athens, so renowned for military achievements, and so illustrious for improve- ment in the liberal arts and sciences, was founded by Cecrops, 1460 years before Christ.* About the same time, Cadmus, the Phoenician, introduced al- phabetic writing into Greece, iukI founded Thebes *Chronologers differ widely in their opinions concerning the time, when Cecrops flourished. Some make it upwares of fifteen centuries before Christ ; some better than fourteen. Dr. Priestly, after Newton, makes it but about eleven and one fourth. I have followed the most prevailing authorities. The probability is», that the exact time is not kaoww-* 8d ANCIENT GREECE. in Boeotia. Danaus also founded Argos ; and Pelops, a Phrygian, whose descendants, intermarrying with those of T)'ndarus, king of Lacedemon or Sparta, ac- quired to that famil)' the ascendency for many cen- turies, in the peninsula of Greece. Cecrops and Danaus were emigrants from Egypt ; Cadmus was from Phoenicia, and Pelops from Phrygia ; so that the four most ancient and powerful cities of Greece, viz. Athens, Sparta, Thebes, and Argos, were founded ai^d for a long time governed by d}' nasties of foreign princes. Their names, exploits, and misfortunes, are inimortalized by the sublime genius of Homer. Not far from this period, Deucalion reigned in Thessaly. From the name of his son Hellen, a considerable portion of ti»e ancient Greeks were called Hellenes ; and, from Dorus, Eolus, and Ion, some of his more remote descendants, they were distinguished into Dorians, Eolians, and loiiians. Before the arrival of Cecrops, Danaus, Cadmus, and other adventurers in Greece, its inhabitants were savage, barbarous, and unconnected ; living entirely in a state of nature,* without laws, civilization, or any forms of social order. But those enterprising chiefs, coming from more enlightened regions, and bringing with them the first rudiments of science, were able, by policy or by arms, to establish their authority among those rude tribes and savage clans. They collected them together, built cities, and found- ed many useful institutions, tending to ameliorate their barbarous state. But if these adventurers found it difficult to reduce those tribes into a well regulated gtate of society, under the mild influence of laws, it was still more difficult to defend them from the in- cursions of the more wild and ferocious tribes bor- dering upon them. They were fierce and warlike ; * If bj a state of nature is meant a state agreeable to the light of nature, or natural reason, it is by no means a savage state ; which reason abhors. If it means a state, in which children re- ceive no education from those around them> there is certainly no such state. — £d. ANCIENT GREECE. 81 "knew Iktle of agriculture ; roved from place to place, and subsisted by rapine and plunder. Two circumstances in those limes ejreatly quicken- ed ijie progress of the Greeks in various useful arts; the discovery of the use of iron, and the extension of the knowledge of alphabetic writing. jThe former enabled them to construct instruments df agriculture and commerce; and the latter to diffuse and improve the general means of knowledge. Yet the advan- tages arising from alphabetic writing, were far less rapid in those times, than one would imagine, since, according to Herodotus, a system of written laws was not promulgated in Greece till about the sixth century before the Christian era — a circumstance truly sur- prising, considering the progress of the Greeks in the science of government, at a much earlier period, and the strength and quicknessof their inventive powers. The ancient Greeks have the honor of exhibiting to the world the first example of a political confede- ration, founded in reason, and matured upon princi- ples, whose strength and excellence gave permanency to the institution, as well as to the several states and governments existing under its influence. The coun- try of Thessaly had been governed by Deucalion ; and his descendants, as already noticed, founded the Dorians, Eolians, and lonians. This country lay far north of the Hellenic tribevs, and was continually exposed to the incursions of the warlike savages on their borders. To provide more effectual means of defence against these dangerous irruptions, the lead- ers of several tribes or slates entered into a confede- racy for mutual defence. Their place of meeting, which was semi-annual, was at Thermopylae, a place rendered ever famous by the unparalleled bravery of Leonidas. The king of Thermopylae, at that time, was Amphictyon. He.ice they were called the Am- phictyonic council. This combination, while it did not interfere essentially with the independence of the several states, served as a grand political centre,, 82 ANCIENT GREECE. combining the energies, uniting the policy, and har- monizing the movements of the whole. 13) means of this, the Greeks were at length formed into one grand confederated republic; for, although it origi- nated without the peninsula, hy modern geographers called the Morea, its advantages were soon perceived, and the central states of Peloponnesus, the Spartans and Argives, became members of it, and by the mid- dle of the fourteenth century before Christ, most of the states of Greece followed their example. The members of the Amphictyonic league, for a considerable time, were fully employed in regulating their own governments, and repelling the invasions of their hostile neighbors. But at length the restless and active spirit of a warlike people, began to extend its views to conquest, and its desires were expanded with a thirst of glory. About 1260 years before Christ, took place the celebrated expedition of the Argonauts, headed by Jason, a Thessalian chieftain, and by the fathers of the celebrated warriors, who shone in the siege of Troy, But, passing over this, as also over the exploits of Theseus and other warriors of that heroic age, we shall, to gratify the taste of the juvenile reader, be a little more particular in relating some of the leading circumstances of the Trojan war. Previously to the commencement of this war, the Greeks had made considerable progress in the arts, both of war and peace. Their savage manners were softened ; their internal policy was regulated by the maxims of justice. In their manners, customs and religion, they were similar ; and their united coun- sels gave wisdom, energy, and despatch to their move- ments. Seven independent states occupied, at this time, the peninsula of Greece, although it was but 200 miles long, and 140 in breadth. These were Messenia, Elis, Arcadia, Corinth, Achaia, Argos, and the powerful kingdom of Sparta. The Grecian ter- ritories withouf the peninsula, were more extensive, being 260 miles from east to west, and 150 from ANCIENT GREECE. "83 north to south ; comprehending Thessaly, Attica, iEtolia, and sundry other provinces. The kingdom of Troy lay on the eastern shores of the Hellespont, the southern coast of the Propontis, and in general the territories of the Lesser Phrygia, The Trojans were of Grecian extraction. Their em- pire was founded by Dardanus, about 200 years be- fore this period. Hence, they were called Dardans ; and their country Dardania. Ericthonius, the son of Dardanus, was succeeded by Tros. Hence, they were called Trojans. The son of Tros was Ilus, from whom Troy was named Ilion. Ilus was succeed- ed by Laomedon, and he by his son Priam. Priam, after a long and prosperous reign, was destined to see the ruin of his kingdom, the extirpation of his race, and to fall by the victorious sword of the Greeks. It is generally agreed that a hereditary enmity had subsisted between the Greeks and Trojans. Paris, the son of Priam, the most beautiful man of his time, having been allured by the fame of Helen, the queen of Sparta, went over into Greece, and visited the Spartan court. Helen is celebrated by the poets, as possessing every personal charm in its highest per- fection, and as the most perfect beauty of ancient times. Her susceptible heart was too easily capti- vated by the artful address and polished manners of the perfidious Paris. She listened to his insinuations, and lost to a sense of honor and duty, she made her escape with him, and took refuge amidst the towers of Troy. The king of Sparta, stung with the treach- ery of his beauteous queen, whom he adored, and • enraged at the baseness and perfidy of the Trojan prince, to whom he had shown all the rights of hospitality, loudly complained of the injury, and ap- pealed to the justice of his countrymen. His brother Agamemnon, the most powerful prince of Greece, seconded his complaints, and used his influence and authority to rouse the resentment of the whole ex- tensive confederation. He succeeded : for the princes 84 ANCIENT GREECE. and people of Greece, no less wounded in their pride than stung with a sense of the atrocious villany, de- termined to extinguish the flames of their resentment in the blood of Priam and his people, who refused to restore the illustrious fugitive. We shall not detail the particulars of this war. Those, for whom this work is designed, will find them at length in their proper place, in a course of reading. It shall suffice to say, that a powerful army was sent to wage war with the Trojans; but the enterprise was found to be attended with unforeseen difficulties. The Trojans were a brave and gallant people, of considerable resources, and very great courage. Hector, the son of Priam, equalled only by Achilles, commanded the Trojans, and often disputed the field of victory, with invincible bravery, and various suc- cess; and when, after the death of Hector, the Tro- jans could no longer keep the field, the city of Troy Was defended by lofty towers and impregnable walls. Homer is the chief and almost the only authority on the Trojan war, which, if it ever existed, would have been lost in oblivion, but for his pen. Among other things in praise of Homer, strength and sub- limity of genius must certainly be ranked; but amia- bleness of character cannot be reckoned, nor yet the fair impartial openness of the historian. His par- tiality is often so glaring, as to involve him in gross absurdities. While he seems impatient and loath to allow the Trojans any military merit, and is ever dis- posed to accuse them of meanness and the basest cowardice, he enrols the Grecian heroes with gods, because they could conquer them. The honor of the conqueror is commonly measured by the great- ness and potency of the enemy he conquers. Ho- mer certainly loses sight of this principle, and es- pecially in the character of Hector, who, in his last encounter with Achilles, is compelled by the merci- less partiality of the poet, to act a more pitiful cow- ardly part, than we should have reason to look for in ANCIENT GREKCE. S5 the conduct of the meanest soldier in a mordern army. Instead of (ighting Acliilles, like a man, he is made to turn on his heels and ran in a cowardly manner. The mighty Trojan, at length run down, like a sheep pursued hy a wolf, is quietly butchered. The fortune of Greece prevailed ; not however by arms, but by stratagem. The Greeks, worn out by a war of ten years, determined to risk their hopes on one desperate eifort, which, if successful, would end the war in victory; if not, would exterminate all liope of conquest, for the present, if not forever. They made preparations for returning home, embark- ed in their ships, and set sail ; but they left near the city a wooden horse of vast size, in which was en- closed a band of their bravest heroes. This image, they pretended as an oifering to tlie goddess Minerva, to be placed in the Trojan citadel. To give elFect ta this stratagem, Sinon is despatched over to the Tro- jans, with an artful and fictitious story, pretending he had made his escape from the Greeks. The supersti- tion of the times gave them complete success. The whim struck the Trojans favorably. They laid open their walls, and, by various means, dragged the bane- ful monster, pregnant with destruction, into the city. That night was spent in festivity through Troy. Every guard was withdrawn ; all threw aside their arms; and, dissolved in wine, amusement, pleasure, and repose, gave full effect to the hazardous enter- prise of the hardy Greeks. The fleet, in the night time, drew back to the shore; the men landed and approached the city : the heroes in the wooden horse sallied forth, killed what few they met, opened the city-gates, atsd the Greeks entered. The night, which was begnnin feasting and carousal, ended in confla- gration and blood. The various parts of this daring plan, liable to great uncertainties and embarrassments, were concentrated and made eflfectual by the signal of a torch shown from a conspicous tower by Helen her- self, the perfidious beauty, who had caused the war. 8 86 ANCIENT GREECE. This Story, as to its leading parts, is probably founded in fart ; whctiier it is so or not, it does the highest honor to the genius of the poet by whom it is related, if true, or invented, if fabulous. Never was national vengeance nnore exemplary, or ruin more complete. The destruction of Troy took place 1184 years before the Christian era. This fall of the Trojan empire, was linal. Independence and sovereignty^ never leturned to those delightful shores ; nor has that country since made any figure in histo- ry. It continued to be possessed and colonized by the Greeks, while they flourished, and followed the fortunes and revolutions of the great empires. If the charms of Helen proved the destruction of Troy, yet the Greeks themselves, though they were able to punish her seducer, had little reason to boast of their conquest, or glory in their revenge. On their return, their fleets were dispersed, and many of their ships wrecked on dangerous coasts. Some of them wandered through long voyages, and settled in foreign parts. Some became pirates, and infested the seas with formidable depredations. A few, and but a few of them, returned to their homes, where fortunes equally disastrous followed them. Their absence, for a course of years, had quite altered the scene of things ; as it had opened the way to con- spiracies, usurpations, and exterminating revolutions. Their vacant thrones had been filled by usurpers ; and their dominions, left defenceless, had fallen a prey to every rapacious plunderer. The states of Greece, which, at the beginning of the Trojan war, were rising fast to prosperity, power and happiness, were overwhelmed with calamities, and seemed re- turning rapidly to savage barbarity. The institution of the Olympic games, their nature, and important influence on society, together with the character, laws, and institutions of Lycurgus, next meet the eye in tracing the great line of Grecian history. But these events are too far distant in the ANCIENT GREECE. 87 region of uncertainty, wFiere real historical light holds a doiibirui rcii>[n with fable and fiction, to merit an extended place in these sketches; and, were they diifereotlj situated, they would lead us into details, far too minute and extensive for a work of this nature. Not to see'H, however, utterly to neglect a matter so extensive in its influence, ajul so lasting in its consequences to Greece as the legislation of Lycur- gus, we shall close this chapter with a general view of the character and institutions of that great man. We have already seen the deplorable state of Greece after the 'J'rujan war. It will be proper to remark here, that the tumults, revolutions, and calam- itous events of those times, no less encouraged the savage enterprises of banditti, robbers, and j)irates, than they roused the genius and talents of men of great and virtuous minds. In the midst of these convulsions, the Delphian Oracle had ordered a general armistice, and that certain games should be revived, or more properly formed into a regular and permanent institution. The lively and flexible ge- nius of the Gretks, ambitious, fond of amusement, of competition, of pomp and glory, was animated with the proposal. All thoughts of hostility were immediately laid aside in the general preparation for this splendid festival, which was to last five days, and to be begun and ended in the worship of Olym- pian Jove. The most important of the Olympic games, were wrestling, boxing, pancratium, coit, foot race, horse race, and chariot race. Of these, the pancratium, which united boxing and wrestling, was the most dang^erous and terrihle, and the chariot race, ])y far the most honorable of all. Iphitus, prince of Elis, seconded by the countenance and advice of Lycurgus, the Spartan law-giver, was the second founder of this noble institution. A large and beau- tiful plain near Olympia, in the Peloponnesus, was chosen for the purpose. Here a gymnasium was erected ; and all the plain was adorned with gardens, 88 ANCIENT GREECE. porticoes, columns and arches, to render the scene as delightful and grand, as possible. In a word, these games were frequented by an assennblage of nations; and to be a conqueror here, inflamed the ambition of mankind more than the honors of war or govern- ment. Ljcurgus, moved by the miseries of his country- men, and induced to hope success from his know- ledge of their genius and character, formed the grand design of reducing them to order, under a new form of government, and a new code of laws ; the objects of which seem to have been to promote civil liberty and justice, public and personal safety, and military glory. After regulating the various powers of government in reference to those important objects, he proceeded to introduce an agrarian law, causing an equal divi- sion of lands among the people. He abolished the currency of gold and silver, and allowed no money to be used but iron. He prohibited every article of luxury, greatly improved the Spartan soldiery and mode of fighting, and raised the Spartan common- wealth to the highest eminence of military fame. But the spirit of his laws, and maxims of his govern- ment, resembled more the severity of military disci- pline, than the mild and gentle wisdom of civil policy ; and, allowing them their utmost merit, they tended rather to convert a being of tender sensibilities and line and noble affections, into a cold, unlovely ma- chine of reason, apathy, and stern justice. But the Greeks, in those times, would have rejected a plan divebled of all the errors to be found in that of Ly- curgus. it is impossible to civilize a nation at once; and indeed, the laws of Lycurgus, considering the time when they were formed, and the effects they produced on society, cap be regarded in no other light than as an astonishing display of wisdom, ener- gy and virtue. ANCIENT GREECE. &9 CHAPTER XT. ANCIENT GREECE, FROM THE LEGISLATION OF LYCUR' GUS, TILL THE ISSUE OF THE PERSIAN INVASION. WHOEVKR surveys the Grecian history, will im« mediately perceive the inequality of the states, of which their grand confederacy was composed. Some of them were large and powerful ; others were small and perpetually exposed to injustice and insult from their haughty neighbors. The Lacedemonians first, then the Athenians, and at last the Thebans, were at the head of the confederacy ; directed their counsels ; led their armies ; often drew them into wars ; indeed conquered and enslaved some of them ; and perpet- ually aiming at directing the helm in all public con- cerns. 5 Ambition is natural to man ; nor does it ever ap- pear more evident, or more odious, than in the con- duct of the popular leaders of democratic confedera- cies. They cherish what they disclaim, and are, in all respects, what they would be thought not to be. The artful demagogue has substantial reasons for preferring democracy to monarchy. In the latter, he has no hopes ; in the former, experience suggests to him, that the more noisy he is for liberty, the more certainly he shall enjoy all the sweets of power; and he well knows, that the more he flatters his blind devotees, the more certainly will they suffer their eyes to be closely veiled, and the more implicitly will they obey his mandates. Among the ancient histories, none are so impor- tant, or contain such useful instruction, as that of Greece. There the ambition, the haughtiness, the injustice of large states, and the inconveniences, de- pressions, and final subjugation of small ones, afford a solemn warning to our own free and happy coun- try. In the present chapter, we shall take a brief survey of the Grecian history, from the times of Ly- 8* '?0 ANCIENT GREECE, curgus till the defeat of the Persians at the batile of Plaiaea. and of the issue of the Persian invasion. Neither the benign influence of the Olympic games, of the laws ot Lvcurgus, nor the Amphicty- onic council, could preserve thenn from the rage of civil war. The power and ambition of the Lacede- monians, soon drew on them the jealousy of their sister states. A quarrel breakini: out between them and the Messenians. a rich and populous province, ijing on the western shores of the Peloponnesus, a long and desolating war ensued. Both parlies were exasperated by a series of injuries : and it became at len^ih. on boih sides, a war of passion, as well as of interest, and of extermination, as well as of conquest. The Lacedemonians fought for interest, revenge and glory : the Messenians. over and above all these, had still more powerful motives: they fooght for inde- pendence, life and fortune. Though fortune seemed early to incline to the Spartan cause, as thev were evidently an overmatch for their adversaries, yet no advantage was gained, but by the greatest efforts, nor maintained, but by the utmost vigilance. The ground was always disputed with the fiercest conflict ; and every victory was dearly bought. At length, however, overpowered by the steadv vizor and discipline of the Spartan armies, the Messenians were driven from the field, and be- sieged m their capital, Ithome. which, after a brave resistance, was forced by famine to surrender. ^ The wretched Messenians. who escaped the sword, went into voluntary exile, or became slaves : and their valuable territories were quietly possessed by their haughty conquerors. The Lacedemonians, having now glutted their vengeance, and enriched their treasures by the spoils of a sister state, enjoyed repose for thirty years. How difficult it is to conquer a nation of freemen to repress the energies, and crush the spirit of a peo- ple determined to be free ! After groaniag in servi- ANCIENT GREECE. 91 tude, and feeling the iron grasp of oppression thirty years, the Messenians revolted, shook off the yoke, and were able to maintain a war still more formida- ble, and by far more doubtful and threatening on the side of Sparta. They had previously drawn into their alliance the Argives and Arcadians, who promised them the most effectual aid they could give. They were commanded by Aristomenes, a general whose wisdom and temperance could only be equal- led by his intrepid bravery. But we cannot descend to particulars. The dispute was long and bloody, seeming often to threaten the existence of the Spar- tan commonwealth ; but fortune at last declared a second time against the unhappy Messenians. The steady discipline and invincible courage, and great resources of Lacedemon prevailed; and the Messe- nians, borne down by inevitable destiny, forsook the field, dispersed, abandoned their ancient abodes, and sought refuge in foreign countries, where a brave and enterprising spirit obtainec' for many of them an honorable settlement. Their brave and generous leader, Aristomenes, after a course of adventures, ended his life at Sardis. " Other generals," says Dr. Gillies, " have defended their country with better s ccess, but none with greater gloi-y ; other charac- ters are more fully delineated in ancient history, but none are more deserving of immortal fame." The conquest of Messenia, by the Spartans, took place about 670 years before the Christian era. From this period to the defeat of Croesus, king of Lydia, by Cyrus, as related in a former chapter, comprehending about 120 years, a series of events arose, of high importance to the Greeks; and in which vast accessions of light are thrown over the histories of Europe and' Asia. During this period the Assyrian monarchy became extinct; the Persian arose to the empire of Asia ; and the Jewish mon- archy, having been overthrown, had experienced a depression and captivity of seventy years. 9@ ANCIENT GREECE. The forms of government in Greece had, some time previously to this, been changed ; and their monarchies, or rather tyrannies, had given place to democratical republics. The human mind, seeming- ly slow in the progress of discovery, ytt rapid in the improvement of discoveries, when niside, or of hints leading to them, seemed, first among the Greeks, and not far from this period, to acquire just views of its own natural and inherent rights. As men are nearly of equal size and strength of body ; as there is a general similarity in their mental endowments; as they are actuated by like desires and aversions, pains and pleasures ; so they are naturally entitled to equal rights, privileges and enjoyments. The consideration, that the monarch's power ex- ists only by the consent of his subjects, induced the Greeks, when they saw that power abused, to with- draw from it their support. Pursuing the same course of thinking, they were able, at last, to project various forms of government, resembling each other as to the origin, the distribution, and the end of su- preme power. As they saw clearly, that all power, in its first principles, was in the people, and that it should only be exercised for the good of the commu- nity, they contrived to distribute it among various persons, who should act by delegation, as servants of the public, and who should be responsible to the public for their conduct. This may be called a gov- ernment of checks. The wars, carried on during this period by the states of Greece, can by no means have a place in this compcnd : for although the ambitious, restless and enterprising Greeks were continually agitated by feuds and quarrels, arising from their schemes of aggrandizement, both in the grand council of Am- phictyons and in the sev^eral states, yet they were engaged in no wars of considerable moment. The sacred war (so called) became interesting and im- portant, as it gave rise to the establishment of the famous Pythian games. ANCIENT GREECE, 93 The commonwealth of Crissa, a small state, lay near the famous temple and oracle of Delphi. Al- though that' oracle was highly venerated by all Greece, and many other nations, yet the Crisseans, allured by the immense treasures deposited there, as offerings to the god of wisdom, fell upon, took and plundered that sacred place. A thrill of horror spread tlirough all Greece, together with the strong- est emotions of anger, grief, indignation, and revenge. The promiscuous blood of age and innocence, and the violation of hunianity, honor and modesty, were forgotten in the enormous and dreadful guilt of so great a sacrilege. To the Amphictyonic council, it belonged to pre- scribe what measures should be taken to punish this unparalleled outrage. Yet such were the dissensions^ the political interests, and more probably the cor- rupting power of gold, that that venerable body were at much difficulty, before they could resolve on proper measures. At length, however, they were roused by the elo- quence and authority of Solon, one of the Athenian representatives, to punish this crime against religion and mankind. Bui indecision in their councils ren- dered their proceedings slow; nor was it till after considerable time was spent^ that the Crisseans were besieged in their capital, and ultimately destroyed • their cities demolished, and their soil condemned to perpetual sterility. In gratitude to the gods for the fortunate issue of the Crissean or sacred w^ar, the council of Arnphic- tyons instituted the Pythian games, which were cele- brated with a pomp and splendor little inferior to the Olympic. The termination of this war, and the in- stitution of those celebrated games, took place about 590 years before Christ, in the second year of the forty-seventh Olympiad, and about three years before the destruction of Jerusalem by Nebuchad- nezzar. 94 ANCIENT GREECE. We are now drawing near to that period, in which Greece enjoyed tlie meridian of her glory. The wis- dom tjf her counsels formed a powerful confederacy, equal in strength to the greatest empires; yet being divided into small, independent governments, the lawless ambition of individuals found less room for action, while personal virtue and enterprise were more secure of a due reward. Greece, having pass- ed through a long and dubious infancy, began now to feel the vigorous bloom of youth, to display a de- termined character, and to assume that commanding attitude, which never fails to excite confidence, vene- ration ar»d respect. We have already noticed the soil, climate, and general features of that country, which was to cberish the first of the ancient nations. No subject is more wrapt in darkness, than the origin of the ancient lan- gti jges : )et it will scared} be allowed to be conjec- ture, when we assert, that the Greek language, from its earliest stages, seems to have been the most per- fect, which nature ever formed, or divine wisdom ever inspired. Its copiousness and strength were no less adapted to the boldest eloquence, than its varie- gated and harmonious tones to every species of poetry. In no language was the grave and dignified style of history and moral sentiment, the native spirit and life of drama, or the wit and pungency of satire, ever better supported. All the natural advantages of the Greeks seem to have been calculated to extend the mind, to strength- en all its faculties, and especially to elevate and em- bolden the imagination* The country was well formed to yield an easy subsistence to its inhabitants ; their government, to cherish genius, and their lan- guage was that of poetry and oratory. Soon after the institution of the Pythian games, the genius of Greece began to display its power, and shoot forth all its beauties. The w^orks of the im- mortal Homer had been read and admired : indeed ANCIENT GREECE. 95 hej had marked their path with light; enkindling it once the hero, the lover, the philosopher, and the egislator, wherever they came. But now appear* d n succession, Archilochus, Terpander, Sappho, Si- nonides, Alcasus, Stersichorus, Anacreon, and Pin- lar ; and many others, whose names and eulogy night fill a volume. Their variegated strains unfold- ;d every form of genius, wandered through every ield of fancy, extracted sweetness from every blossom >f nature, and adapted their harmonious numbers to jvery tone of melody, from the thunders of the war- ike muse, to the melting accents of the lyre. Astonishing were the effects produced by the com- )ined influence of so many happy causes. The arts md sciences, and vvljatr\er might be expected to irise from the best intellectual culture, now began to lourish in manly maturity. Perhaps what we ascribe o superior strength of mind in the ancients, was ather the effect of their amazing indui-try, and the 'nergy and ardor, with which they puisued the ob- ects of knowledge. The moderns, compared with hem in this respect, have cause to blush at their own ndolence. The Greeks, however, invented, improv- d, and perfected; and tliat especially in those walks if science, where strength and sublimity of mind are nost needful. As a proof of this, we need only men- ion the names of Homer, Demosthenes, Alexander, )o!on, Pythagoras, Miltiades, Piaxiteles, and Phi- lias : we mention them not in the ordt r of time. In a former chapter we have given a sketch of the ^ydian monarchy, founded by Candaulcs, and ended n the conquest of Croesus, by Cyrus, king of Persia. Although the Lydians were a nation giver, to dissi- )ation and the most voluptuous pleasures, yet they vere, at this period, brave, enterprising and warlike ; ind now, commanded by Croesus, a prince highly re- lowned for military and civil accomplishments. The jieeks of Asia, if not in Europe also, must soon have xperienced inconvenience from the growing power 96 ANCIENT GREECE. of Croesus, whose conquests, power, and splendor, far eclipsed those of his predecessors. But a much more terrible power was preparing by Providence to ex- tinguish for ever the light of Croesus, and to change the whole face of things in Western Asia. We have already spoken of Cyrus. In this place it shall suf- fice to say, that his interference forever delivered the Greeks from danger as to the Lydians, but gave them a neighbor in himself and successors, much more formidable. The states of Greece were duly apprized of this, and were unwilling to make so dis- advantageous a change. While the storm of the Persian invasion was gath- ering, Croesus had applied to the Greeks, and espe- cially to the Lacedemonians, for aid. Willing that the powers of Asia should check and balance each other, they were determined with their utmost efforts to prop his falling throne. But the celerity of Cyrus defeated their intentions; for before their auxiliaries could arrive, the decisive blow was struck, and the kingdom of Croesus at an end. The aspect of things now seemed to promise, that there should soon be collision of powers between the Greeks and Persians ; but it is highly probable that Cyrus was willing to decline an attempt to subjugate that hardy race; and especially as Greece presented far weaker al- lurements, than the kingdom of Babylon, and the wealthy cities of Asia. After the conquest of Lydia, while Cyrus was med- itating the subjugation of the Asiatic Greeks, he re- ceived an embassy from Sparta, with a message emi- nently characteristic of that bold and intrepid people. The messenger, in a style truly laconic, told Cyrus, that if he committed hostilities against any of the Grecian cities, the Lacedemonian republic would know how to punish his injustice. It is said that Cyrus, astonished at the insolence of the message, demanded who the Lacedemonians were. This af- fected ignorance was rather designed to express hi^ ■■^mL. ANCIENT GREECE. Ifl contempt, than to gain information. He \ who they were. When he was informed tl one of the states of the Grecian peninsula, b a reply to the ambassadors, which contained a severe and just sarcasm upon their national character. He told them, "that he should never fear men, who had a square in the midst of their city, in which they met together to practise mutual falsehood and deception ; and that, if he continued to enjoy the blessing of health, he hoped to afford them more domestic rea- sons of complaint, than his military preparations against the Greeks of Asia." The Greeks of Asia soon fell a prey to Harpagus, whom Cyrus left behind him, with a powerful army, to complete the conquest of these countries, while he himself, now burning with ambition, directed his march tow'ards Babylon. For a period of nearly forty years ensuing the tak- ing of Sardis, the Lydian capital, nothing will be no- ticed in the liistory of Greece. And here it will be proper to remark, that the commonwealth of Sparta, which, since the close of the Messenian war, had holden the first place among the Grecian states, was now evidently falling behind that of Athens, and that the latter was fast rising in wealth, learning, power and influence to the supremacy of Greece ;' an as- cendency owing to her commercial enterprise. The short and splendid reign of Cyrus, after the reduction of Babylon, seems to have been fully" em- ployed in settling the affairs of his extensive domin- ions. Nor is it probable, that in an empire of such extent, he had leisure, or much inclination, to di- rect his attention to so inconsiderable an object as the Peloponnesus. The Greeks, therefore, remained in a measure occupied in their own domestic con- cerns, till, in the reign of Darius Hystaspes, an op- portunity presented for the Asiatic colonies to throw off the Persian yoke. That monarch had determin- ed on an invasion of the Scythians, a warlike race of 9 98 ANCIENT GREECE. people, whose first irruption into the countries of Asia, took place in the reign of Cyaxares the First, as already noticed. Darius, meditating revenge for an- cient, as well as recent, injuries, at the head of fOO,000 men, traversed Asia Minor, crossed the Bos- phorus of Thrace, and was presently seen on the banks of the Danube. Over that broad river, he laid a bridge of boats, and crossing it, plunged with his immense army into the wilds of Europe. Having spent several months in fatiguing marches, vain pur- suits, incessant labors, and continual alarms, he found his army greatly impaired, their numbers diminished, and their spirits wasted. On his return, being en- tangled by mountains, forests, rivers and morasses ; flying parties continually hung upon his rear, and for- midable hordes often throwing themselves in his way, threatened to cut off his retreat. The news of his disasters reached the Danube, where he had posted strong guards to defend the bridge, he had thrown across that river. Several of the commanders station- ed there advised to break up the bridge, and thereby prevent his return, that his ruin might be completed. Among the foremost of those advising that measure, was Miltiades, the Athenian, who considered this as an opportunity, which ought not to be lost, of restor- ing the Asiatic Greeks to their liberty. But the plan failing of success, Miltiades was compelled to seek safety in Athens, to escape the resentment of the Persian monarch. This celebrated advice of Mii- tlides, of which a particular account is given by Cor- nelius Nepos, was defeated by the counsel and autho- rity of Histseus, the Milesian ; who thereby saved the life of Darius, and brought himself into great favor with that prince. Darius, on his return to his own dominions, formed the design of punishing, not Miltiades alone, but the Athenian commonwealth. The conquest of the states of Greece, seems to have been a favorite object with the Persians, from the time of Cyrus* Their growing power, their in- ANCIENT GREECE. 99 dependent spirit, and especially the lof(y and com- manding attitude they assumed and preserved, was v/ounding to the pride, and even alarming to the fears, of the monarchs of Asia. But the short reign of Cyrus was employed in matters judged to he of greater moment. 1 he arms of his son Camhyses, were carried in a ditferent direction; nor was it till the reign of 11} staspes, that an invasion was carried into effect. Darius returned fron) his invasion of Scythia, covered with shame, and exasperated with disappointment. But finding himself re-seated on his throne, he considered it as a ma^tter equally dic- tated by revenge, interest and honor^'that he should now chastise the Greeks, who, during his unfortunate expedition to Scythia, had shown but too clearly their pleasure in his disgrace, and their readiness to co-operate in a plan for his destruction. Inflamed with resentment, the Persian king there- fore resolved to make the Athenian republic, now re- garded as the head of Greece, the first object of his vengeance. He, therefore, after extensive prepara- tions, considerable delays, and some discouraging disasters, fitted out a very great armament, the com- mand of which he gave to Datis and Artaphernes, men eminently skilled in military command. This mighty army contained the flower of his empire, and was con- veyed in a fleet sufficient to shade the Grecian seas. The majestic armament, after hovering awhile among the islands of the Archipelago, at length, with solemn grandeur, slowly approached the shores of Attica. The flower of the Persian army landed on the plain of Marathon, about ten miles from Athens; where they pitched their camp. In this interesting moment, destined to confirm the glory of Greece, and to elevate the Athenians to immortal renown, that brave but small republic stood alone ; the other states refusing their aid, from republican jealousy, supersti- tion, and perhaps the paralizing shock of dubious expectation. Whatever it might have been, 10,000 100 ANCIENT GREECE. Athenians, and a few men from Plataea, appeared in the field, to cope, as it is allowed by all historians, with ten times their number of chosen warriors. The Greeks, though few in number, were com- pletely armed, and were generally men of strength, courage, and tried skill in the gymnastic exercises. The celebrated Aristides, who was present in this battle, and who had a right, as general, to share in the command, magnanimously resigned his right to Miltiades, as did all the other commanders of Athens. On the morning of the decisive day, Miltiades formed his line of battle with the utmost skill and fore- sight. The heroes of Athens (for such every man of them might be called) took the right, and those of Plataea the left wing of the line, which was formed on the side of a hill ; down which, when the signal for onset was given, the Grecian army moved with order and rapidity. When they came within the reach of the Persian slings and arrows, they ran and closed with the enemy with the most impetuous shock. The conflict was severe, but short. Nothing could resist the valor of the Greeks, or equal the celerity of their evolutions. The Persians were dismayed, broken, routed and dispersed; they fled to their ships in the utmost consternation, leaving 6000 of their best troops dead on the field of battle. The loss of the Greeks was inconsiderable. The death of Darius soon put a period to further preparations against Greece ; nor was the invasion renewed, till the expiration often years. From this period, Athens held unrivalled the as- cendency in Greece; but even the cursory reader will not refuse a tear over the relentless fate of the brave and illustrious Miltiades : for soon after this, failing in an attempt against the isle of Pares, he was tried for his life, fined an immense sum, and flung into prison, where he expired with the wounds he bad received in defending his country. He gave ANCIENT GREECE. 101 liberty and empire to his country, for which they re- warded him with chains and a dungeon. Nor yet can we pronounce with certainty concerning the reasons the Athenians had to doubt his integrity, or to suspect him of maintaining a clandestine corres- pondence with the court of Persia. Many men, whom nature has made brave and virtuous, will at length become intoxicated with power, blinded with self-interest, bewildered with dazzling theories, and liable to the deepest seduction. The Perisans felt so severe a rebuke with sorrow, anger and indignation; and a second invasion was resolved on, as the only expedient to wipe away the disgrace of this signal defeat, which must otherwise remain indelible. The son and successor of Darius Hystaspes, was Xerxes, surnamed the great. We have already spoken of his famous expedition into Greece, in our view of the history of Persia. There we particularly noticed the victory obtained over his fleet, by the policy and bravery of Themistocles, in the battle of Salamis ; and of his precipitate retreat to his own dominions: we also noticed the defeat of the army, which he left under (he command of Mar- donius, in the great and memorable battle of Platsea, by the combined armies of the Greeks, under the command of Aristides and Pausanias. At Marathon, a single state ol Greece had conquer- ed the united armies of Persia : at Salamis, the Greeks had shewn their superiority by sea : and at Platasa, the combined forces of Greece had destroyed the most eflicient force, which could be drawn from the Persian empire, commanded by their ablest gene- rals. The dispute, which for ages had subsisted be- tween the Greeks and Persians, was now decided ; and it was well for the latter, that the former were satisfied without pushing the demonstration further, by arguments still more unpleasant. The Persians, doubtless, meditated no more inva- sions of Greece. The latter was left in the possession 9* 1(32 AJVCIENT GREECE. of unrivalled glory, and the former were compelled to set bounds to their schemes of ambition. If the first part of Grecian history conducts the reader through a period of fiction, the part which we are now upon, opens to the mind a period of virtue, genius, merit and lasting fame. They could boast of a Homer, whose amazing genius was able to construct an epic poem, not only the first,* but the noblest ever formed; a poem, from which the mythologist, the legislator, the historian, the prince, the soldier, and even the geographer, could draw appropriate instruc- tions ; a poem, whose form has ever since been re- garded as an immutable rule and model of perfection; a poem, which has tinged the whole current of poetry in all polite nations, and the lofty flights of whose muse have never been outsoared. They could boast of an Amphictyon, whose wise and comprehensive mind had originated the first political confederacy, to whose benign influence the prosperity and grandeur of Greece may be clearly traced; and to which all free, deliberative, representative, legislative bodies do homage, as their grand parent. They could boast of a Lycurgus, whose powerful projecting mind could control the licentious savage with laws, which, if not the most amiable and humane, yet displayed an en- ergy almost more than mortal ; and which, if they did not produce the most happy, certainly produced the most masculine, determined and brave society of men, ever known. But if the institutions of Lycurgus were deficient in mildness and urbanity, they could boast of a Solon, who united in one system, and condensed into one body, the scattered rays of political wisdom and ex- perience, gleaned up from the wisest nations of his time ; who mingled mercy with justice, and the sternest precepts of philosophy with the softer dic- tates of sensibility and compassion. * It is by no means certain, that Homer's epic poem was ifee first, that was erer composed, — En* ANCIENT GREECES^ t03 In short, as we approach to the final issue of the -*ersian invasion, we are surprised at a group of great haracters, which suddenly crowd the scene. Our ninds are struck with the lustre of their virtues and ictions. Miltiades, whose talents, as a soldier and ommander, availed him instead of a host, first comes Drward : then Leonidas and his adventurous com- lanions, whose souls appear like so man}' bright lames of courage and love of glory : then Themis- ocles, whose deep penetration enabled him to pre- lict and ward oflf approaching danger; and as by his oresight, so by his courage and conduct, to be the avior of his countr)'. But their names and due fraises would fill a volume. So far are we from >eing able to do them justice, that we hope only to waken in the reader a desire to trace them at large n the pages of ancient history. CHAPTER XII. NCIENT GREECE, FROM THE PERSIAN INVASION TILL Tltt DEATH OF ALEXANDER THE GREAT. IN the preceding view of the history of Greece, he reader will perceive, that little mention is made f any of the states, except Lacedemon and Athens, 'or this omission, two reasons are to be assigned ; irst, the brevity of this work requires, that but few hings be noticed, as we pass through a field of such xtent ; and secondly, the other states, whether in he Peloponnesus, or out, whether in Europe or Asia, ^'ere generally animated by the same views and mo- ives, governed by the same politics, and followed ly the same fortunes. Greece had now acquired the summit of her glory nd happiness ; but still she continued to exhibit un- questionable proofs, that no community can eitheV 104 ANCIENT GREECE. boast of unsullied virtue, or can enjoy unmingled hap- piness. Many of those great men, whose talents and j virtues raised their country to its present greatness, either by their own vices, or the ingratitude and envy of their countrymen, were doomed to experience the most painful reverse of fortune. Disgraced by their country, they descended in poverty, sorrow and in- famy, to their graves; leaving it for posterity to do justice to their memory. It will be remembered, that Pausanias and Aristides commanded the Greeks at the celebrated battle of Plataea, where the Persians received their last defeat under Mardonius. Pausanias afterwards, lost to all true sense of rectitude and honor, btcame a traitor, and suffered the punishment he deserved. His col- league, Aristides, though once banished upon suspi- cion, was recalled, and was able fully to demonstrate his innocence. He lived to a great age, enjoying the highest honors of public confidence, and was sur- named the just. But to no commander did the Greeks owe more, than to Themistocles. Historians generally allow, that after the defeat of the Persian invasion, under Darius Hystaspes, the Greeks were of opinion, that there would never be another inva- sion. Themistocles assured them to the contrary He clearly foresaw, that what advantage had been gained over the Persians, would rather rouse their resentment, and stimulate their ambition, than break their spirit. He said, therefore, that the battle of Marathon was but a prelude to a more glorious con- test ; and by his counsel and authority, the Athenians were prevailed upon to forsake their city, which they could not have defended, and risk their fortune at sea. That was doubtless their salvation, as their naval skill far excelled that of the Persians : and even when their fleets were drawn up in sight of each other, the policy of Themistocles brought on an en- gagement contrary to the wish of both fleets, and by that means gave the victory to Greece, which did in reality decide the fate of the War. ANCIENT GREECE. 105 To the superior genius of Themistocies, therefore, Sreece was indebted for her liberties, and her exis- tence as a nation ; and to the same the world is in^ debted for preserving a nation, who were the fathers of literature and government. But his services, however important to his country or to the world, ^.ould not save him. The Spartans regarded him with the most implacable hatred and malice., They implicated him, as being concerned in tiie treason md treachery of Pausanias. They first procured bis banishment, then his death. In a former chapter it has been said, that the great line of histor}' (i. c. if we follow the course of em- pire) would scarcely strike into Greece, till the era 3f Alexander. But this remark must be understood in a sense extremely limited ; for at the close of the Persian invasion, and ever afterwards, nothing re- mained with the Persians but the shadow of empire : for, being compelled to acknowledge the superiority 3f the Greeks, both by sea and land, they were wil- ling to accept of peace on any terms. ' By a most vigorous system of war, arts, agricul- ture and commerce, the Grecian empire now spread in every direction ; and the coast of Asia, from Syria to the Bosphorus of Thrace, owned her sovereignty, including all the adjacent islands. It extended also 3n the shores of Europe, from Epirus round the peninsula of Greece, and stretching to Macedon, Thrace and the Euxine sea. Soon after the close of the Persian war, the Athe- nians rebuilt their city, which had been destroyed by Kerxes; or rather built it anew, and enclosed it with walls, whose height and solidity rendered them im- pregnable to any common form of attack. They also built the famous harbor, called the Piraeus, which lay about five miles from the citadel of Athens. This harbor was large, and convenient for the whole Grecian navy. Here a new city directly arose, near- ly of equal size with Athens. This new city, the 106 ANCIENT GREECE. harbor, and the intermediate buildings, were soon after, in the administration ofCimon, the son of Mil- tiades, enclosed in walls of amazing strength, extend- ing from the old city ; so that the enclosing walls of Athens were upwards of eighteen usiles in length. Under the administration of Cimon, and Pericles, these and various oiher public works were completed ; so that Athens now began to assume a lorm and aspect exceedingly magnificent and splendid. If Eabjion, Nineveh, or Persepolis, covered a greater extent of ground ; if they contained structures of greater di- mensions, still their real glory and magnificence bore no comparison to those superb structures, to which Grecian architecture gave hirth ; and their internal decorations, in comparison with those of Athens, and of other Grecian cities, were like the huge caverns and gloomy vaults, formed by the hand of nature. Not far from this period the republic of Elis built the celebiated temple of Olympian Jupiter; a work equalled in no subsequent age. To afford diversity to the young reader, we shall here give a brief descrip- tion of this famous temple, abridged from Dr. Gillies. There had long subsisted a contest between the Eleans and Pisans, concerning the right of superin- tending the celebration of the Olympic games. This quarrel resulted in a w^ar, in which the Pisans were conquered, and all their effects were appropriated to the building of a temple to Jupiter, by whose assist- ance the Eleans were supposed to be victorious. This temple was of the Doric order, built of stone resembling the Parian marble, and encircled with a surperb colonnade. Its dome was 60 feet in height, 90 broad, and 230 long. It was covered with a rare kind of marble, cut in the form of tiles. At each extreme of the roof stood a golden vase, and in the middle a golden victory ; below which, was a shield embossed with Medusa's head, of gold. On the pediment, stood Pelops and Oenomaus, ready to begin the Olynapic race in the presence of Jupiter. This ANCIENT GREECE. 107 ault was adorned with the battle of the Centaurs nd Lapithae. The labors of Hercules distinguished lie principal entrance. Ai'ter passing the brazen gates, you discover phitus, who, as we have seen, founded the Olympic ames, crowned by his spouse, Echechiria : thence tie way led through a noble portico, to the majestic reation of Phidias, the Athenian ; which formed the rand ornament of the temple, as well as of Greece. ?he god was sitting on a throne, and of such colossal tature that his head reached the roof, 60 feet in leight. This mighty image was composed of gol'd nd ivory. In his left hand, was a burnished sceptre, n his right, an image of victory, and on his head, an n'amellcd cruwn of laurel. His robes and sandals veve variegated with flowers and animals of gold, lis throne was of ivory and ebony, inlaid with pre- ious stones. The feet which supported it, and the illets which joined them, were adorned with innu- nerable figures, among which were the Theban hildren torn by sphinxes, and Apollo and Diana hooting the beautiful and once flourishing family of •Jiobe. Upon the most conspicuous part of the hrone, were eight statues, representing the gymnastic xercises, and a beautiful figure, resembling young ^autarus, the favorite scholar of Phidias, who, in the ontest of the hoys, had lately won the Olympic prize. )n the four pillars, which between the feet, sustained he throne, were delineated the Hesperides, guarding he golden apples; Atlas with mighty effort sustain- ng the heavens, with Hercules ready to assist him; calamine with naval ornaments in her hand, and Achilles supporting the beautiful expiring Penihesilea. But the ornaments of this temple .and stalues were ndescribable; presentinif at once to the eye, a scene )f elegance, beauty, anti majesty, which no words can )aint. There were in Greece, three other temples, f not equal in all, yet far superior to this, in some aspects, (viz.) that of Ceres and Proserpine, at Eleu- 108 ANCIENT GREECE. sis in Attica ; of Diana, at Ephesus ; of Apollo, at Miletus, and of Jupiter, at Athens. During this period, the Greeks seemed to unite every thing i'l their character and actions, which was old, enterprising or great ; but we cannot add, every thing, that was ju^t, generous and humane. Many of their greatest men, they banished ; some, on real con- viction, but more, it is presumed, on suspicion, from the base motives of jealousy and envy ; and the season of happiness and glory for the Greeks scarce- ly arrived, before it was forever past. They now began to (eel the corrupting influence of wealth, power and prosperity. Luxuries, like an over- whelming flood, rolled in from every quarter ; and the insolence of prosperity, and pride of empire, struck at the heart of public morals and virtue, and began secretly to undermine that power, which had raised the Greeks to such an exalted height. The career of those great men, we have just men- tioned, was scarcely past, when the administration of Pericles opened scenes more splendid, more flatter- ing to the vanity, and more corrupting to the virtue, of Athens, than any, which had been before his day. Pericles was endowed with every accomplishment, necessary to enable him to influence and to govern. The most persuasive and commanding eloquence, added to the greatest personal attractions and intel- lectual powers, rendered him the most extraordinary man of his time. He was artful, bold and magni- ficent. He was a friend to every thing great and elegant in the arts and sciences; a professed repub- lican ; an accomplished courtier; capable of build- ing cities; of commanding armies; of leading men's understanding by the force of his reason, however fallacious, and of inflam.ing their passions by his ora- tory. It is said that he thundered, when he spake. Ambition was his ruling pri iciple. His schemes, which were generally concerted with policy, and executed with success, tended uniformly to sink the A!rcIETJT GREECE. 109 Slates of Greece into one genera! mass, on which he might raise, adorn and glorifj the Athenian empire. In short, his aim was to make Athens the supreme arbiter of Greece, and himself the head of Athens. The history of Greece, from the battle of Plataea till the Peloponnesian war, is, in a great measure, the history of governments, and of arts and sciences. We shall pass over this, therefore, a period of about 50 years, and proceed to a brief survey of that war : and we shall see its causes early planted, and its ef- fects gradually forming.the theatre for the Macedo- nian conqueror. 'i'he warlike Medes were inebriated by the wealth and luxuries tFiey found in the first Assyrian empire, which they subdued. The Persians drank the same deadly draught from the conquest of the second. The Greeks were effeminated by the conquest of the Persians; and the Romans, as we shall see in tracing our line, experienced the same, in the conquest of Carthage and Greece. Throughout all ancient his- tory, we see virtue, industry and bravery, combined with ambition, raising nations to empire ; and we see wealth, luxury and vice, undermining and plunging them down to destruction. We have already noticed the ascendency, which the Spartans gained among the states of Greece, in the first ages of those republics. At first, it was real ; at length only nominal ; but after the battles of Ma- rathon, Salamis, and Plataea, it existed no longer. The Athenians seem to have been superior to their sister states in genius, enterprise, and local situation. The gradual, but powerful operation of these, together with many other advantages, more particular and ac- cidental, rendered them superior to all. But by whatever causes they acquired superiority, one thing is certain, they used it with far less moderation, than the Lacedemonians had done before them. The menacing tone, and haughty air, they assumed, were but ill calculated to promote their ancient union": 10 110 ANCIENT GREECE. and indeed they now seemed only solicitous to extort, by force, from their neighbors, degrading acknowl- edgments and humiliating concessions. This haughty and overbearing spirit clearly ap- peared in the administration of Pericles. His lofty and aspiring genius, his bold and animated eloquence, prevailed on his countrymen to throw off the mask, and assert their right to supremacy. The conse- quence was, the extinction of all union, general re- sentment, combinations, conspiracies, and ci^il and desolating wars. In the jjeneral calamities, Athens shared largely. The Peloponnesian war was pro- ductive of incalculable evils; evils of which Greece never recovered — equally subversive of morals, lib- erty and empire : and which prepared the way for the conquest of Alexander. The states of Greece, with equal astonishment and indignation, received ambassadors from Pericles, to- gether with a mandate, that all the states and colo- nies should, by their deputies, assemble at Athens, to adopt measures for rebuilding ruined temples, and paying due respects to the immortal gods, for their assistance in the Persian war. An order so extraor- dinary, in so imperative a tone, was received by many with deep disgust, and secret murmurs; by the Spartans, with resentment and derision ; and by none, with due submission, but those states, whose depen- dence had already insured their acquiescence."^ The tendency of this measure, was to render Athens the source of authority and the centre of deliberation, action, power and honor. When Pericles understood, how this requisition was received at Lacedemon, he is said to have ex- claimed, with his usual forcible and figurative style, " I behold war advancing, with wide and rapid steps, from the Peloponnesus." In this conflict of power, policy, wealth and ambition, it was perceived, that Athens and Sparta must form the two rallying points ; and both those powers had endeavored, by every ar- ANCIENT GREECE. 1 1 1 tifice of open and secret negociation, to strengthen their cause by leagues, alliances and auxiliaries. This men)orable war was begun by the Corinthians and Corcyreans, a colony from Corinth, about 439 years before the Christian era. Corcyra is an island near the entrance of the Ad- riatic sea. East of it lies the kingdom of Epirus ; and west, the bay of Tarentum. This island has been famous even from the times of Homer, who calls it Pboe^.cia. Its present name is Corfu. From remote antiquity this island has been celebrated for its wealth, beauty, and at times, for its naval and mil- itary character. The republic of Corinth bad early sent a colony to Corcyra, which soon grew into a wealthy and powerful state, and was able to resist the haughty and imperious requisitions of the mother country. Nor shall we find a more convenient place than this, to notice an essential blemish in the moral and political character of the ancient Greeks. The spirit of emigration and colonizing prevailed more with th^ Greeks, than with any nation, ancient or modern. It was, indeed, the natural result of their national character, form of government, and local situation. Enlightened, free, independent and enter- prising, the defenceless state of many of their more barbarous neighbors, invited their aggressions ; and the numerous islands of the surrounding seas, gave ample room and full scope to the indulgence of their roving and restless propensities. They emigrated, invaded, conquered and colonized. And, before the commencement of the Peloponnesian war, could their powers have been brought to a common focus, by a plan of policy sufficiently strong and combining, they would have formed the most powerful and warlike nation ever known. But, in this respect, they were far behind the Romans. Divided into small inde- pendent governments, they were distracted and torn by mutual jealousies ; and their caprice, tyranny and vengeancej were often wreaked upon their refractory 112 ANCIENT GREECE. colonies, towards whom they made it a point to pre- serve an attitude the most commanding and super- cilious. A predominance of this unhappy temper, occasioned perpetual broils, and at last, brought on an eventful struggle, from the deplorable conse^ quences of which, Gieece never recovered. After some battles, and various success, the Cor- cjreans, finding themselves in danger of being over- Gome, applied to Athens for aid, which was granted. In the mean time, the war is prosecuted with vigor : the Athenians send aid to Corcyra. Corinth is over- matched, and applies to Sparta and the Peloponne- sian states; and they, at length, fall in on the part of Corinth. Thus, instead of Corinth and Corcyra, were seen ^Athens and Lacedemon in the field of action, the states of Greece divided, nnd the devasta- tions of war spreading over their fairest provincesr? The Spartans, vif in any degree less warlike than in former times, were certainly more enlightened, more politic, and directed by maturer councils*^ Their bravery and fortitude were still terrible to the haughty Athenians; and Pericles himself might have seen reasons for wishing, that he had been satisfied with a more tacit acknowledgment of Athenian great- ness; especially, when he now often saw that proud capital tottering on the brink of destruction, exposed to the fortune of a most eventful war, and severely distressed by pestilence. , While the confederate armies wore ravaging the country of Attica, even almost to the gates of Athens, a dreadful plague broke out in that city. As its first appearance was at the Pira3us, it was generally he- lleved to have been imported from abroad in the Athenian vessels. This was about the year before Christ, 430. The glory of Greece was now past its meridian : for, whatever party might prevail, the reader must perceive a train of inevitable evils in consequence. Deplorable is the state of a kingdom diviekd againsl ANCIENT GREECE. 113 'Isdf, For the particulars in this wide and melan- choly scene of war, destruction and nnisery, the reader must be referred to the histories of those limes. There he will find, that on the 1 6th of May, 404 years before Christ, at the end of 27 years from Ihe commencement of this unhappy conflict, Athens, :he glory of Greece, the mistress of the arts and sci- ences, was taken by the confederate armies, and her walls, her towers and her fortresses, levelled to the ground. The day, says Dr. Gillies, was concluded by the I'ictorious confederate armies, with a magnificent festival, in which the recitation of poems, as usual, formed a part of the entertainment. Among other pieces was rehearsed the Electra of Euripides, and particularly that aflfecting chorus, " We come, O daughter of Agamemnon, to thy rustic and humble roof." These words were scarcely uttered, when the whole assembly melted into tears. The forlorn condition of that young and virtuous princess, ex- pelled the royal palace of her father, and inhabiting a miserable cottage, in want and wretchedness, re- ':alled to mind the dreadful vicissitude of fortune, kvhich had befallen Athens, once mistress of the sea, ?ind sovereign of Greece, but deprived, in one fatal hour, of her ships, her walls, and her strength, and reduced from the pride of prosperity and power, to misery, dependence and servitude, without exerting one memorable effort to brighten the last moment of her destiny, and to render her fall illustrious, n The Peloponnesians vainly boasted, that the fall of Athens would be the era of Grecian liberty. Athens, indeed, tasted that bitter cup, which lawless pride and ambition generally presents to her votaries. By her situation, her genius and prosperity, she seemed designed as the guardian of Greece; but her ambition to govern or to conquer, which none in- flamed more than Pericles, was as rash and presump- tuous, as it was foolish and vain. Athens, thus 10* 114 ANCIENT GREECE". humbled, prostrated, and crushed, never rose (o her former state; and the power?, which triumphed over her, were involved in her destiny j resembling the members of a body, which revolt from the head, cast it down, and trample it in the dust. After this period, however, many great men ap- peared in Greece; but no general bond of union could be formed. Intervals of peace were short ; and their few virtuous characters only shown like passing meteors, for a moment. If Alcibiades was famous for his talents, he was no less infamous for his vices ; and the few splendid actions, he performed were ut- terly insufficient to counteract the general effects of caprice, crooked policy, and a total want of virtue. Athens had scarcely recovered a measure of liberty, by the exertions of Thrasybulus,* and began to res- pire, after a shock so paralizing, and calamities so dreadful, when war again broke out. This is com- monly called the^oeotian war. Instead of rising, as did the former, from the Peloponnesus, it now point- ed its averjging flames toward that haughty combina- tion of powers., and menaced them with a fate, similar to that of Athens. It is remarkable, that as the sun of ancient Greece was still lingering on the western horizon, as if loath to set, she at times displayed an effulgence of genius, which few nations could boast, when enjoying their meridian of glory. In the days of glory, which Sparta and Athens had seen, it was little expected, that Boeotia would ever be the terror of Greece ; would not only excite their jealousies, but alarm their fears, and would render necessary their utmost exertions, not to say in defence of their honor, but of their national existence. Historians, without a dissenting voice, allow? Epa- minondasvto have been great in the various characters of statesman, hero, patriot and commander. The * After the Peloponnesian war, the government of Athens was usurped by 30 men, " the dependents and creatures of Sparta," who, on account of their tyranny, are generally called the Thirty TyrarUt, From these, Athens was delivered by Thrasybulus.-^ED» ANCIENT GREECE. 115 rhebans and their confederates were led by this i^ost accomplisl^ed general into the Peloponnesus, Lacedeniou was Ihcir nnark. They ravagjed the :ountry of Laconia, even to the gates of Sparta, riiat proud and powerful people had not seen such a iajr for five hundred years. The skill and valor of Agesilaus saved them. The course of human affairs resembles a revolving wheel, some parts of which are perpetually rising, »ome falling; some are up, and some down. It is in- :Tedible, that Lacedemon should be compelled to apply to Athens for aid, whom she had so lately :onquered ; but this she did, and that with success. The war progressed with vigor; was protracted; iiad various turns, and was at leny;(h teiminated in a General battle, at Mantinasa. This bailie is allowed lo have been the most equally matched, the ablest conducted, and the most bravely fought, of any one ?ver fought in Greece. While the fortune of the i'dy was evidently declaring for the Thebans, Epa- triinondas was killed. This roused the drooping spirits of the Spartan allies, and at last rendered the k^ictory doublfuL It was claimed on both sides. With Epaminondas, expired the martial spirit of his country : for, although the Thebans maintained the ascendency for some years, and were able, for a while, even to control the decisions of the Amphic- lyonic council, yet they gradually stink to their former insij^nificaiice. This great general terminated his career in the 2d year of the lOUh Olympiad, 36S years before Christ, and may be considered as one of the lai?t expiring lights of the Grecian republics. Within eiizht years of the death of Epaminondas, Alexander the Great was born, generally acknowl- edged to be the first of heroes and of conquerors. Under his powerful srepire, the Greeks, the Persians and even the Indians, formed but one amazing field of conquest. Empire first having taken her flight from Persia and irom the Grecian republics, seemed for a white 116 ANCIENT GREECE. hovering on other shores and coasts, as in doubt where to settle. More than 800 years before the Christian era, a colony from the ancient city of Tyre, whose history we have already noticed, crossed the Mediterranean, and setL^tid in Africa. Those enterprising adven- turers, conducted by the celebrated Dido, founded the city and empire of Carthage. The Carthagi- nians, by degrees, extended themselves along the shores of Africa, and subdued the islands of the Med- iterranean, great part of Sicily, and even many isl- ands in the Atlantic ocean. They succeeded, and very far exceeded their mother country, in the em- pire of commerce, and were for many years masters of the sea. But the Carthaginians, like the Trojans, were destined, after flourishing a while, to enhance the triumph and exalt the fame of their conquerors. They were checked by the Greeks, and (inally sub- dued by the Romans. The Romans, about this time, flourished under a consular administration. Manlius Torquatus, Decius Mus, and others, were cotemporary with Alexander. But the Romans were yet unknown to fame; their wars not having extended beyond the small tribes and states of Italy : for it is remarkable, that, after Rome had been an independent state 360 years, her territories did not extend twenty miles from the city. But a power was now rapidly rising'-, much nearer to Greece, which was to change the scene in Europe and Asia, and to influence the state of numerous na- tions, to ages unborn. Northwestwardly of the head of the Archipelago, and separated from that sea by several small Grecian republics, lay the country of Macedon. Its exact size, as also its boundaries northwardly, were little known even to the ancients, and still less to modern geographers. The country was rough, mountainous, and, for the most part, wild and barren. As early as the Persian invasion, these parts were little known. ANCIENT GREECE. 117 riiey had been colonized and subdued by the Athe- lians, bat had revolted in the course of the Pelo- (onnesian war. Amyntas, the grand-father of Alexander the Great, ^'as the first prince of that dynasty, of any consider- ble note in history. He is represented by Quintus ^urtius, as a man of great abilities, equally brave in he field, and wise in council. But, overwhelmed k^ith difficulties both foreign and domestic, he was ble only to plant those seeds of greatness, which lere afterwards to flourish and influence the destiny if half the nations of the earth. During his reign, he Macedonians were too wild and barbarous to oalesce in any settled plan of policy, civil or mili- ary. Of course they were kept in perpetual fear rom the inroads of the lllyrian tribes, which skirted hem on the north. The Greeks, likewise, though wasting aw^ay by wift degrees, in the fires of civil war, were still war- ike and powerful, under the administrations of Cimon, Vricles and Epaminondas. The life of Amyntas vas strongly imbittered by intrigues and conspiracies, n his own palace, carried on by his famous, or rather nfamous queen Eurydice: a calamity, which, amid 11 their greatness, seemed to pursue that whole dy- lasty of Macedonian kings, until it exterminated the losterity of Philip, king of Macedon. Amyntas had three sons, Alexander, Perdiccas and ^hiiip, the father of Alexander the Great. After a roubiesome reign, he was succeeded by his eldest son Uexander, who found full employment in repelling he invasions of his ferocious and warlike neighbors- n an unsuccessful war with the Illyrians, he was com- )elled to become tributary, and to give a royal hos- agc. lie gave his younger brother Philip, who, dur- ng his residence with those rude but martial people, :ained a knowledge of them, which was afterwards >f eminent service to him ; though he was then but a >oy. On a similar occa-^ion, being afterwards sent to Phebes, he there enjoyed the greatest advantages. 118 ANCIENt GREECE, Epaminondas then flourished ; and taking Philip under his immediate protection and care, he educated him together with his own son, in the Grecian lite- rature, in which he made great proficiency. The school of adversity, gives lessons of wisdom, and im- parts an energy to man, almost indispensable to great- ness. For the most part, the more pampered and delicate children of easy fortune are enervated in the germe and blossom of life, and are forever hushed on the downy lap of prosperity, to inglorious repose. It was not so with Philip. In those adverse for- tunes, which could not break his spirit, he learnt pa- tience, humility and wisdom. Fie found ample re- sources in his own mind, made strong by exertion, and rich by experience. Three years after the battle of Mantinasa, and the death of Epaminondas, Philip found that country in the utmost confusion. There had been no settled administration; but civil w^ar, assassinations, revolu- lior}s and anarchy* Philip was a prince of great abilities, and equal ambition. He cast his eyes over the wide prospect ; and, allured by the most brilliant hopes of aggrandizing his family, and invited by the degenerate effeminacy of the Athenians, the discord of the Peloponnesians, and the general weakness of all Greece, he laid the plan of an empire, which his son was destined to execute, and to exceed. Fortune seconded his views. His measures, taken with pro- found policy, and executed with surprising celerity, soon put him in peaceable possession of Macedon. He married Olympias, a beautiful princess of Epirus, whose personal and metif^l attractions made her no less worthy of his regard, than the greatness of her family, descended from Achilles, rendered her worthy, of sharing his throne. The Greeks, now degenerated from the glory of their ancestors, found their chief resource against the arms and policy of Philipyin the sublime and power- ful eloquence of Demosthenes. The muses, partial ANCIENT GREECE. 119 ) this delightful land of their nativity, having long efore this done what they could in forming the ther of poets, now^ made their last efforts in forming 1 orator, never to be excelled. But, alas ! in vain ere the powers of rhetoric displayed. The strong- it reasons and the sublimest descriptions, the most »lemn warnings, the most animated addresses, were itidotes too feeble to recover a nation, forever lost ► virtue; they were arms and bulwarks far too weak • resist a powerful conqueror. Yet they often seem- 3 to resuscitate the dying flame of liberty, and co- perating with other impediments to the consumnia- on of Philip's ambition, that prince left his main Uerprise to be eflfected by his son. A letter from Philip to Aristotle, the Grecian phi- sopher, announcing the birth of Alexander, his son, worthy of insertion ; " Know, that a son is born to 5. We thank the gods, not so much for their gift, 1 for bostowing it at a time, when Aristotle lives. Je assure ourselves, that you will form him a prince, orthy of his father and of Macedon." When Alex- ider was thirteen years old, Aristotle commenced lis employment, as the young prince was then found Die to receive and digest his instructions. " It is npossihle to say how far the greatness of the one as owing to the instructions of the other; but it is > more certain that the one conquered the world, lan that the other's opinions predominated over en's understandings during sixteen centuries."* In the full career of pleasure and ambition, Philip as assassinated, in the 47th year of his age, and 1th of his reign, by Pausanias, as he was walking om his palace to see the public games, between his m Alexander, and his nephew of the same name, hilip had been very unhappy in his family, had ate at a public feast, in a rage drawn his sword and ished upon his son to kill him; but Alexander by a uick motion of his body evaded the blow aimed at * Dr. Gillies. 320 ANCIENT GREECE. his life. It was believed bj many, that he was privy to his father's assassination. Thus fell Philip, in the vigor of his life ; his favo- rite schemes being as yet accomplished but in part. When we view his life, actions, achievements and character, we can entertain little doubt, that he was the ablest statesman of any monarchy beyond the Augustan age. Alexander immediately ascended his father's throne ; and it was soon perceived, that the admini- stration of the government would lose nothing by the change. His first enterprise was against the barbarous and warlike nations, that lay north and west of Macedon. Wherever he turned his face, all opp®sition vanished before him. On the death of his father, many pow- erful and independent tribes of Thrace had seized the opportunity, expecting to avail themselves of the inexperience and youth of his son. But Alexander, although he was now, and from the moment of his accession to the throne, preparing for the invasion of Persia, determined to convince them, that they had nothing to hope from his inexperience, nor to expect from his negligence. At the head of a well appoint- ed army, and with generals, whom his father had taught the art of war, he penetrated into Thrace, and was victorious in several sharp encounters. He cross- ed the Danube, and displayed his triumphant standard on the northern banks of that river. ^ There, many , neighboring nations, struck with the Terror of his an.«3, sent him their submission in the humblest terms.] But while he was marching and conquering in the wilds of Europe, a report was spread in Greece, that he had fallen in battle. Whether the belief of this was real or pretended, the perfidious Greeks, though thfty had just before complimented him by appointing him general of Greece, began now industriously to foment a war with Macedon. Athens, Sparta, and particularly Thebes was at the head of this attempt. ANCIENT GREECE* 121 The news of this diversion reached the youthful con- queror, as he was ready to return. In eleven days le was seen before Thebes; which ancient and ven- erable city he had destined to utter destruction. He ook it by storm, put the inhabitants to the sword, md levelled it to the ground. Thus ended the city )f Cadmus, after having remained one of the heads )f Greece 710 years. The Greeks, struck with dread at the fate of riiebes, sent ambassadors to appease the resentment >f Alexander, and to congratulate him on the success ►f his northern expedition. I^ever did the character »f a nation undergo a greater change, than that of jreece, from the times of Miltiades to those of Alex- nder. They now were as low, as they had been xalted ; as feeble as they had been strong; and as (lean and base, as they had been noble and magnifi- ent. Indeed, so rapid was their declension, that the Drtune of Alexander was to them rather a favor, than scourge. But nothing could exceed the decision and dis- latch of his counsels, the energy of his preparations, r the rapidity of his motions. He despised all lower counsels, all delays, and even the usual pre- autions, which commonly retard warlike schemes. lis father's ablest generals were astonished at tlie Igor and success, with which he executed the boTd- st plans. One reason he assigned for invading 'ersia, was a pretended suspicion, that their emis- iries had been cojicerned m the murder of his ither ; although the impartial reader of history annot avoid a suspicion of a very different nature. Alexar.Her, having intrusted his domestic concerns or such now were those of Macedon and Greece) to iiitpater, set forward on his Persian expedition, at ir head of an army consisting of 5,000 horse and 0,0' (0 foot. In twenty days he arrived at the Lellespont, where he crossed without opposition into isia. 11 122 ANCIENT GREECE, With SO small an army, says Quintns Curtius, it is doubtful, which is most admirable, the boldness or the success of Alexander's vast enterprise. His army was truly a veteran arm3% consisting of old men, who had fought in the earlier wars of his father and uncle. His soldiers were grey headed, and when embodied, they resembled the venerable senate of some ancient republic. Their dependence was not on the swiftness of their feet, but on the strength of their arms. The extensive regions of the Persian empire wore inhabited by various nations, without any common bond of religion, manners, language, or government. Their capital cities were dissolved in luxury; and their provinces had long been in a state of real dis- memberment, for want of any combining system of policy, either civil or military. Murders, treasons and assassinations were the usual steps to the throne; and, when seated there, the monarch's business was little better. Although the Persians were abundantly forewarned of Alexander's intentions, yet they suffered him to advance into their dominions, unmolested either by sea or land. In their confusion and alarm, which every day strengthened by intelligence of the rapid advances of the Greeks, the advice of their ablest counsellors was rejected, either through ignorance or envy. The most skilful generals in the service of Darius, urged the utter impolicy of risking a general battle with Alexander, whose impetuous valor, now enhanced by the necessity of conquering, would drive him into the most desperate efforts. It was therefore advised to lay waste the wide country be- fore him, and tame his courage by delays. By this policy, Fabius afterwards checked the progress of Hannibal, and saved Rome. But the foolish and haughty satraps of Persia rc» jected this advice with disdain, as unworthy of the dignity of the empire of Cyrus, especially, as it came ANCIENT GREECE. 123 from Memnon, the Rliodian ; the only general, how- ever, in the armies of Darius, whose opposition ap- peared at all formidable to Alexander. This great man, however, was soon removed by death ; and Darius was left to the folly and perfidy of men, who knew no language but that of flattery. The river Granicus issues from mount Ida, in the Lesser Phr}gia,and falls into the Propontis. On the eastern baikks of this river, the Persian commanders assembled their forces with the utmost expedition, and determined to resist the shock of the enemy; and from this place, the scouts of Alexander brought him the desired intelligence, that the Persians were assembled in considerable force. As he approached the river, he perceived the Persian army on the op- posite bank. Determined on an attack, he immediately made dispositions for crossing the river. His cavalry opened to the right and left, and displayed the form- idable Macedonian phalanx of infantry, divided into eight sections. A line was instantly formed. While these arrangements were making, Parmenio, a general as celebrated for bravery as for caution, remonstrated against crossing the river in such dan- gerous circumstances. The channel, though forda- ble, was deep and rough, the current rapid, and the bank steep and rocky. The enemy stood on the op- posite bank; and the river must be forded, and the bank ascended, under showers of arrows and darts. But nothing could intimidate Alexander. He leaped upon his horse, assumed the command of the right wing, and gave the left to Parmenio. As he dispersed his orders, a fearful silence ensued, and both armies expected the onset. In a few moments, the Macedo- nian trumpet was heard from all the line, and the whole was seen entering the river. As they reached the opposite bank, the shock was dreadful : for the Persians, who fought for life and empire, received them with the most obstinate bravery^ Alexander was conspicuous by the bright- 124 ANCIENT GREECE. ness of his armor, the terror of his voice, the aston- ishing celerity of his movements, and the victory and death which attended his arm. He infused his spirit into his army. It was impossible not to be brave, where he was. But his intrepidity led him into dangers, which none but himself ever seemed destined to escape. His spear was broken in his hand ; his helmet saved his life from the stroke of a battle-axe ; and the brave Ciitus, whom he afterwards murdered in the fnrv of passion, saved him at the same instant from the stroke of a scimitar, which must have proved fatal. The fortune of the day was nearly decided, before the phalanx of infantry could ascend from the river. Their dreadful aspect, glittering with steel, completed the victory ; and the Persians were either killed, taken, or dispersed. Besides that this battle seemed to presage the future fortune of the war, it was ruin- ous to the cause of Darius, who here lost several of his ablest commanders, with about 20,000 men, while, incredible to relate, Alexander lost only 30 or 40. The fortune of no conqueror is better known, than that of Alexander. His only impediment in the sub- jugation of the Persians, seemed to be the great ex- tent of their territories, and the distance of their capitals and fortresses. Darius Codomanus displayed little else in the course of this war^ which was to put a period to his empire, but weakness, cowardice, the most stupid ignorance, extreme vanity, and a total incapacity either of governing a kingdom, or of com- manding an army. Between the battle of Granicus and that of Issus, where Darius commanded in person, nothing took place worthy of insertion in this compend. In gen- eral, the masterly policy of an extensive plan of operations, united safety with dispatch, and crowned every movement with success, as much to the glory of the invaders, as the ruin of the invaded. The defenceless nations of the Lesser Asia, sent their ambassadors in throngs to deprecate the ven- ANCIENT GREECE. 125 geance, implore the mercy, or court the alliance, of the young hero. But he moved from place to place with a celerity, which almost denied access to his faint hearted but nimble footed suppliants. Parmenio, the next in command to Alexander, was dispatched on various excursions, either to receive submissions, or to reduce such strong holds as might dare to stand a siege ; but the king of Macedon him- self held a more regular line of march, and halted at the great cities. When arrived at ancient Troj, he performed splendid sacrifices and honors at the tomb of Achilles, his great maternal progenitor. It is al- lowed by all, that he took that hero for his model. So enamored was he of the character and glory of Achilles, that he constantly carried Homer's Iliad in his pocket, and read in it almost every day and hour. The delays of the Grecian army led Darius to imagine, that fear kept the Greeks at a distance. To give the young reader a view of the character of the Persian monarch and nation, and generally of the imperial pomp of the ancient Asiatics, we shall here descend to a brief detail of the preparations of Darius, and particularly of the order of the camps and movements, which we translate and abridge from Quintus Curtius's Life of Alexander. We deem this apparent disproportion allowable, both from having promised it, in our preface, and from the vast impor- tance of the events, to which it leads. Darius Codomanus may be compared with Louis XVI. of France. If the term innocent or inoflfen- sive is applicable to an absolute monarch, they were both among the most innocent, inoffensive, or harm- less of their respective dyna.lies. Vv'hen Darius per- ceived at a distance the gathering slorm, rising from Macedon, he sent a splendid and haughty deputation to Alexander, in which he declared himself to be the king ofking6\ and the relation of the gods, and that Alexander was his servant. This commission was given to the satraps of the empire with orders tQ 11* 126 ANCIENT GREECE, seize the mad boy, (for so he termed Alexander;) to whip him severely, to clothe him in mock purple, and bring him bound to him ; moreover, to sink his ships, jn which he had crossed the Hellespont, and to send his army in chains, into exile, to the farther shore of the Red Sea. The Persian lords, entrusted with this gentle office, assembled what they thought a sufficient force, on the banks of the river Granicus, where they intended to execute, to every punctilio, the orders of the monarch of Asia. They found it no easy task to seize the mad eoy. The only great military character at this time in the service of Darius was Memnon, the Rhodian. That experienced soldier comprehended, at once, the nature and consequences of this threatening war; and advised his master to the only expedient, which could have exhausted the impetuous fire of the mad boy, so much despised at the Persian court. Mem- non's advice, together with its rejection, have been already noticed ; as also the result of the affair at the Granicus. The loss of the battle and so great a part of the army* of Granicus, for the first time, roused the king of Persia from his dreams of security, and opened his eyes on the imperious necessity of decisive measures. Without loss of time, he endeavored to wield and concentrate the strength of his empire, on an emer- gency, which had not occurred, since the days of Cyrus. The regions of Asia have always been populous ; and Darius found no difficulty in assembling an army answerable to the dignity of the king of kings* He assembled his forces on the plains of Babylon, and, determining to command in person, made his disposi- tions accordingly. According to an ancient custom of the Persians, he began his march, to meet the enemy, at sun-rise, * Probably about one tenth part of the Persian army fell in tke liattle of Qranicus.— ■£!>» ANCIENT GREECE. 127 and in the following order. Foremost went the magi, supporting, on altars of massy silver, what the Persians call the sacred and eternal fire. They be- gan to move at the sound of the trumpet, given from the king's pavilion, at the same time chanting a hymn, suitable to the grand occasion. The magi were followed by three hundred and sixty-five youths, a number equal to the days of the year, veiled in Tyrian purple. A splendid chariot, sacred to Jove, followed these, drawn by white horses ; and then a horse of wcnderful size, which they called the steed of the sun. Behind these, were ten chariots, richly embossed Vvith silver and gold, which were followed b) the cavalry of twelve nations, with various arms and ensigns. A corps of 10,000 chosen warriors, ar- rayed in the most superb style of eastern magnifi- cence, covered with gold and gems, whom they called [he immortal band, went next; and they were follow- ed by 15,000 men, denominated the king's relations, dressed in a style of the most costly and effeminate luxury. Next to these, went a band called the Doryphori, dressed in royal apparel; before whom moved the superb and lofty chariot of the king, sup- ported on each han\ He reminded them of a series of victories gained, when victory was far less necessary, but never, when it would be more glorious. The conflict for a while was severe and dreadful. Darius did every thing he could to sustain his falling throne. Indeed the Greeks in his army fought with great bravery, and in discipline, were little inferior to the Macedonians. Had their numbers been equal, they might have influenced the fortune of the day. But an immense rout and confusion soon took place in the Persian army; and when the Greeks saw themselves contending alone against a superior force, such as were not slain, either surrendered, or fled in despair, Darius soon perceiving ail was lost, with some difficulty effected his escape. In the camp of Darius was found considerable trea- sure : but what was most inestimable to Alexander, was the family of the unfortunate Darius. Among othiT royal personages, were taken Sisygambis, the mother of Darius, his children, and his queen, the beautiful and celebrated Statira, considered as one of the finest women of antiquity. The ardent and ANCIENT GREECE. 13$ youthful conqueror, on this occasion, displayed the highest sensibility and honor of a soldier and hero. And his behavior to those noble captives, nnay be compared with that of the great Cyrus before, and of Scipio after, his tinne, on occasions nearly similar. (tie treated them with the respect and deference, due to the elevated rank of their more fortunate days; and strove by commiseration, pity, and tenderness, to mitigate the severities of their hard fortune. In- deed, bis heart, subdued by the resistless charms of virtue, innocence and beauty, of a conqueror made him a captive in his turn. He afterwards married Statira,* and made her a second time queen, not of Persia only, but of Asia, Africa and Europe. Her second elevation, however, was soon terminated by a destiny most severe and dreadful. On the death of Alexander, she fell a sacrifice to the cruelty and am- bition of those blood-thirsty harpies, whose first care was to exterminate the family of Alexander. In a former chapter, we have spoken of the siege of Tyre by Nebuchadnezzar. The taking of that celebrated city by Alexander, was not one of his least brilliant exploits. Although conquered and humbled by the Assyrians, that queen of commercial cities had regained her former splendor, and had forgotten her ancient f:ill and degradation. The Tyrians, having sent Ambassadors to Alexander, de- sired to know his pleasure, and declared their sub- mission to his will. B(it when they were informed, that he intended paying them a visit, they, with equal modesty and tirmness, sent him word, that although they were disposed to do homage to his will, yet, as they were an independant state, they could neither admit him or the Persians to make their city a party in the war. This was enough for that ambitious conqueror. He instantly determin- * The Statira, whom Alexander married, was probably the (laughter of Darius and not his queen ; tliough her name also was Statira. — Ed, 12 134 ANCIENT GREECE. ed to try their strength. Tjre Avas prohably th^ strongest city in Wehtern Asia. This great city was seperated from the shore bj a narrow strait of half a nnile in width. Its wails were a hundred feet in height, and eighteen miles in cir- cuit. Its provisions and naval and nnilitary stores were very great. As Alexander had little hope of takinij the city but by land, he constructed a mole acro!tting often defeated, and at last overthrown with irrecoverable disgrace and ruin — if all this merited for him the title Great, surely no one ever earned it more completely. We shall notice particularly but a few things in the reign of this prince; neither of which very well com- port with his being styled the Great. The first is his war with Arsaces, king of (he Parthians, or Persians. This enterprising and warlike prince restored, in some measure, the ancient government of Persia, which the Romans never fully subjugated. Antio- chus had a long war with him, and gained some ad- vantages ; but could never conquer him. The second thing we shall notice concerning Anti- ochus, is his rejecting the advice of Hannibal, the Carthaginian general, and thereby failing of the aid of that great and warlike genius. The fall of Car- thage being now foreseen by Hannibal, he saw no 144 SYRIA. power either in Euiope or Asia, to wliom he could apply for aid, or with whom he might unite his en- deavors against the Romans, except the king of Syria. To him, therefore, he went and tendered his assis- tance and advice. The substance of Hannibal's ad- vice to Antiochus was, that he should make war upon the Romans, whose power had now become formida- ble to all nations ; that they should immediately be invaded in the most vigorous manner both by sea and land ; and that Italy itself should be the seat of war.. This advice was no less timely and important, than it was judicious and practicable ; and a conformity to it was of equal moment both to the giver and receiv- er. But the Syrian king, whose views and concep- tions wanted that extent and viaor necessary to raise him to a level with Hannibal, and actuated by a mean jealousy, lest the superior talents of the latter should eclipse his own, pursued a quite diiferent course. Antiochus invaded Greece; was met by the Roman armies ; was defeated by sea and land, and that, on the side of the Romans, almost without the loss of blood. With the loss of great part of his do- minion?, he was compelled to pay an enormous trib- ute, and to accept of the most disgraceful terras of peace; and Lucius Scipio, the Roman general, ac- quired the surname of Asiaticus, in honor to him, as the conqueror of Asia. Sometime after this, Antiochus was killed in rob- bing the temple of Elymais, dedicated to Jupiter Be- lus, having reigned 36 years. The history of Syria, from this period, is virtually but the history of a Ro- man province, although it bore the form and sem- blance of a monarchy for 122 years. Seleucus Phi- lopater next ascended the Syrian throne, on which he maintained a dubious authority for 11 years. After him, the succession took place in the following order, Antiochus Epiphanes, 11 years; Antiochus Eupator, 2 years ; Df metrius Soter. 12 years ; Alex- ander Balas, 5 years ; Demetrius Nicanor^ 5 years ; Antiochus Sidetes, 10 years; Demetrius Nicanor, 11 years ; Zebina, 2 years ; Antiochus Grypus, 27 years. During the last mentioned reign, and 1 1 4 years before Christ, Antiochus Cyzicenus established a new king- dom at Damascus, which remained independent of Syria for 30 years. Seleucus succeeded Antiochus Grypus, and reigned 4 years; after him, Philip, 9 years, in whom, ended the Selcucid'de, or the family of Seleucus, after having swayed the sceptre of S)ria 229 years. This was in the year 83, before the Christian era. If poisons, assassinations, conspiracies, treasons — if murder of fath('rs, mothers, brothers, sisters and children-v-if the violation of every law of nature, reason, and jus- ti<:e, was ever the peculiar characteristic of any dy- nasty of monarchs, it surely belonged to this. The S}rians at length expelled and excluded the Seleuci- dae from the government, and elected Tigranes, king of Armenia, to be their king. Under Tigranes, the royal digtiity of Syria became extinct, and that coun- try was made a Roman province by Pompey; of whom we shall speak in our view of the Romap his- tory. S}ria became a province of Rome/65 years before Christ,^ With a brief survey of the history of Egypt, from the death of Alexander, till the subjection of that country to the Romans, we shall close our view of Alexander's empire. If any of the princes of those times deserved the name of Soter, or Savior, the first Ptolemy must have been the man ; since (he is allow- ed by all ancient writers, to have been a prince of great wisdom and virtue.^ In the division of Alexan- der's conquests, it has already been remarked, that Egypt fell to Ptolemy. After a war with the rival princes for several years, he found himself firmly set- tled in the government of Egypt; and his reign com- menced in the year before Christ, 304 — eight years after that of Seleucus in Syria. To detail the parti- cular wars between Egypt and Syria, (for they were 13 146 EGYPT. almost incessant,) would not consist with the brevity of this work. It shall suffice to say, that the kings of Egypt held a respectable ascendency among the suc- cessors of Alexander. They generally reigned with more dignity, and certainly perserved their indepen- dence longer, tlien either those of Syria or Macedon. Ptolemy Soter, having reigned 20 years from the time of his assuming the title of king, and 39 from the death of Alexander, being above 80 years old, re- signed his kingdoji) to^^hiladelphus. his son^ prince famous for his exertions to promote learning, ar)d for the encouragement he gave to learned meniy,^TIie celebrated Alexandrian library had been beguii^fcy his father*^ who was himself both a scholar and philoso- pher. It was kept in the temple of Serapis, reckoned one of the finest and noblest edifices of antiquity. This library consisted of two parts; one of which, containing 300.000 volumes, was kept in a quarter of the city called Bruchium ; the other part, consisting of 200,000 volumes, was kept in the Serapeum, or temple of Serapis. The library of Bruchium only, was burnt by Julius Cesar: yet in after times, as we liave before stated, all was lost. This important library or museum drew together the most leariied society in the worlds and raised Egj'pt once more, and probably for the last time, to be the august patroness of science. The presidents of this museum were the first counsellors of state to the kings of Egypt ; and the first president, appointed by Ptolemy Philadelphus, was Demetrius Phalereus,' a Greek who h.ad been for several years governor of Athens — a man of great learning and abilities.* It is remarkable, that the dynasty of Ptolemies, from the accession of Ptolemy Soter till the end of the reign of Cleopatra, lasted 294 years; the whole of which period comprehended only eleven reigns, * Great indeed he must have been, since Cornelius Nepos says, that the Athenian senate erected 300 statues to perpetuate his memory. EGYPT. 147 and that almost in an unbroken succession. Those princes must have reigned, on an average, about 27 years. The shortest reign of them all was 13 years. Several of them reached nearly 40 years. They stand in the following order, Ptolemy Soter, 39 years; Phi- ladelphus, 38; Euergetes, 25; Philopater, 17; Epi- phancs, 24 ; Philometer, 35 ; Physcon, his brother, 29; Lathyrus, 36; Alexander, in right of hi^ wife, 15; Auletes, 13; Cleopatra, 22 years. The Hebrew monarchs, from Saul to Jehoiakim, reigned, on an average, 24 years each; the Persian, from Cyrus to Codomanus, 18 years; the Roman, from Augustus to Constantine XH. emperor of Constantinople, 12 years; the English, from William tlie Conqueror to George II. 22 years. If long reigns and regular successions may be re- garded as evidences of the wisdom, good fortune, and mild administration of the prince, and of the content- ment, tranquility and equanimity of the public mind, the Ptolemies may be reckoned among the most hap- py and fortunate of the monarchs of antiquity. Without noticing particularly the several reigns in this period of history, we shall close it with a few general observations. An event took place about this time, which serves, perhaps, above all others of a historical nature, to de- monstrate the very high antiquity and great authority of the scriptures of the Old Testament. We have al- ready spoken of Demetrius Phalereus, who was the greatest scholar and philosopher of his time. Plu- tarch informs us, that this Demetrius advised Ptolemy Soter to make the largest collection he could of books, which treated of the government of states and king- doms, as he would thereby obtain the advice and ex- perience of wise men in former ages. Soter accord- ingly engaged in the work ; but it was more fully ac- complished by Philadelphus. Among many other histories and codes of laws, they also obtained from the high priest of Jerusalem, an exact copy of the 148 EGYPT. sacrrd writings, together with seventy-two learned Jews. v>'ho were deeply skilled in the Greek language, to translate them. These persons proceeded into Egypt, and, under the inspection of Demetrius Pha- lereus, accomplished that celebrated translation. This was (lone in the eighth year of the reign of Ptolemy Philadelphns. The concurrent testimonies jof many ancient authors establish, beyond all possible doubt, the certainty of this transaction ; and of course, they also establish other things, (viz.) that the writ- ings of the Old Testament existed in the days of Ptolemy Philadelphns; and that their credit and au- thority were then gi-eat and unquestjonable. There is indeed a doubt, whether the trueSeptuagint trans- lation is now extant. According to Epiphanius, it was burned in the Alexandrian library of Bruchiuui by Julius Cesar. But on the contrary, Tertullian affirms it to have been kept in the Serapeam, and of course, that it escaped that conflagration. From the death of Alexander to the conquest of all his dominions by the Romans, the belligerent powers of the konwn world may be divided into four parts, forming two grand theatres of war. The firs% and by far the grandest scene was made up of the Romans and Carthaginians and their several allies ; the second was composed of the powers we have been considering in this chapter, (viz.) tlie Macedonians, Syrians and Egyptians. The latter had ambition enough, but with little power or policy ; the former were ambitious of empire, and were nearly on a foot- ing as to the necessary means of gaining it. For it is justly remarked by an able historian, that the genius of war forsook the Greeks at the death of Al- exandef^^nd went over to the Carthaginians. Alexander's conquest must, on the whole, be re- garded'as a benefit to the world.. Had the Persians conquered Greece, or the Carthaginians, Rome, an age of darkness must have ensued, through which the wing of conjecture is unable to explore its flight. EGYPT. 149 Thosfi nations, under which Rome uitimately fell, al- though rough and savage, }et had great vigor, both of body and nnind. The world has therefore once more risen to the light of science, reason and civili- ty. But the oppressive tyranny of southern climates threatens to extinguish reason and virtue, and over- whelm men in everlasting darkness. The conquest of the Greeks left no nation worse, than thej found them, h certainly left many nations better. Even Greece itself found an enemy in Alexander less dan- gerous, than It did in Pericles, An artful demagogue of great talents is the most dangerous man the world evt r saw, and is the greatest curse to any form of government that ever befel it. Alexander found the Persians at their lowest ebb. Had he not conquered them, they would soon have conquered themselves. Indeed, they had done it already ; and were falling into ruin by the natural progress of internal debility. The Egyptians were regenerated by his conquest; and were never more flourishing, respectable, en- lightened or happy, than under the Grecian dynasty. Grecian literature generally travelled with their arms, and planted itself with their colonies; and be- fore the Augustan age, had diffused itself through most parts of Europe and Asia : and if the military spirit of the Greeks rested on the Carthaginians, their love of the arts and sciences surely did no less on the Romans. From the foundation of the commonwealth of Athens, by Cecrops, to the death of Cleopatra, the last of Alexander's successors, was upwards of one thousand four hundred years. During this period, the Greeks founded and overturned the greatest em- pires; they excelled all nations in architecture, stat- uary, painting, poetiy and oratory ; they gave the world its first hero ; they exhibited the greatest vari- ety of character, and the most astonishing displays of genius ; and they may be considered as justly meriting the first rank among the nations of the 13* 150 ROME, earth. Their history, therefore, and their language open a more variegated, rich, beautiful and sublime field of study, than those of any other nation. CHAPTER XIV. ROxME. BRIEF HISTORICAL VIEW OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE, FROM THE FOUNDING OF ROME BY ROMULUS TO THE EXPUL- SION OF TARQUIN THE proud; CONTAINING A PERIOD OF TWO HUNDRED AND FORTY-FIVE YEARS. AS the traveller, who passes the night in wander- ing through Sonelj solitudes and frightful naountains, till, at break of day, he linds hiinself in a delightful country, surrounded with the beauties of nature and art ; so it is with the historian, who passes through tlie dark and barbarous ages, ^'hich lie between us and the prosperous times of the Roman empire. Wheii we view the distant glorif>s of Rome through the in- tervening shade, and indulge the melancholy reflec- tion, we are prompted to exclaim, And could such an empire decline? Could such magnificence perish? Could such wealth be dissipated, such institutions be overthrown, and such splendid scenes be darkened forever? Yes! The industrious malice, the barbarous rage of man, will generally supersede the ravages of time, or at least, will always share with them, the .empire of destruction. OVhen we pass beyond the dark ages, the Roman empire, of which we are now to speak, first attracts our attention:), It is a common, perhaps some will consider it as a trite, saying, that nations and govern- ments, considered as public bodies, resemble, in their growth and decline, the human body. The remark eminently applies to Rome, which had a long and feeble infancy 5 a most vigorous youth ; a manhood ROME. 151 proud, powerful, splendid, and vicious, of majestic size and connnnanding aspect, yet inwardly wasting with incurable disorders, and pregnant with the seeds of dissolution 5 and a most di!»astrous and miserable old age.| It may be thought fanciful, but the follow- ing view of the Roman history will be divided into four parts, with reference to these four different ages or states observable in that history. (The iniancy of Rome may be extended to the expulsion of laiquin, (U. C* 215J which will be (he subject of this chap- ter. Its youth may be extended frcm thence to the conquest of Carthage, (U. C. 621) — it>* manhood, to the end of the reign of the Antonines, {\J, C. 935,) and its old age, from thence to the r<^ign of Agus- tulus and its conquest by the Goths, upwards of twelve hurjdred j^ars from its foundation. ;1Elornulu^^founded tb^ city of Rome iu^the year of the' world 3,252, andCjj^fore Christ, 75^^ four years before the commencement of the era of Nabt;nassar; 148 years before that of INel'Uchadnezzar ; in the 7th year of the reign of Jotham, kir^g of Judah ; 216 years before the taking of Babylon by Cyrus; and some years after the death of Lycurgus, the Spartan law- giver. That famous <"3ty stands (for it is at this day one of the finest cilice m t^urope) on the bonks of the river Tiber, on the western sljores o{ Italy. Italy Is a strip of land which projects from the southern part of Europe into thf^ Mediterranean sea. '^It is fancied by some to resemble a boot and spur, with the toe pointing toward the island of Sicily. ^4 is thought to be about 600 miles long, and nearly 100 in breadth. It occupies a mild and pleasant region in the temperate zone ; is well situated for commerce ; has a fruitful soil, and most of the natural advantages of the best countries in the world. From the very high antiquity of the Roman state, it will be perceived, that the materials for writing its * U. C. are tbe initials of two Latin words, urbis conditae, sig- nifying the building of the citj. — £». 152 ROME. early history must be scarce. These have been care- fully economized by historians, and an)p]ifipd and embellished by poets, for more than two thousand years. But when we consider that the Rom:ins were not a literary people, till after they had conquered Greece, and especially, when we consider the small- ness and obscurity of their state during the period of their kingly government, we shall want no further evidence, that the accouois given even of that whole period, are not aniong ihe most credible parts of ancient history. The ancient writers aW agree, that during the reign of the kings/fheir territories were almost limited to the city, and Hfever extended fifteen miles from \t} and that their wars were with petty states, like themselves. The events, therefore, re- corded in this long and sterile period of their history, can have no importance in themselves, and would never be worth detailing, were it not for the lustre, which is shed upon them b) the lyreatness of Rome in succeeding ages. But as to the history of the kings of R »me, from Romulus back to ^i.eas and the Trojan war. ail the respect is due to it. which is ever due to the ingenius fictions of a strong poetic fancy; and perhaps liitle more. There is, however, another reason, why it is inexpedient to follow the thread-bare detail of tne his- tory of the Roman kings. No history is so com- mon as that; no one so much read, or so much re- membered ; no one exists in so many forms, or has been attempted by so many writers. Dr. Gold- smith's abridgment is exactly the thing, which ought to be written, were we to attempt to do it. Those, therefore, who wish to peruse a concise, but regular and formal detail of those events, are recommended to read that excellent abridgment. The kings of Rome succeeded one another in the following order ; Romulus reigned 37 years ;vNuma Pompilius,"43 ; Tullus Hostilius, 32; Anrus Martius, 24 ; Tarqiiinius Priscus, 38 ; Servius Tullius, 44 » ROME. 153 Tarquinius Superbus,"*" 25 ; making in the whole, together with several short interregnums, 245 years. If we may suppose, that the Romans, while yet so v^ery small, maintained their sovereignty and inde- pendence during so long a period, their affairs must have had a stahility and regular order, which were the result of great wisdom and prudence. The most that can be said of them with certainty is, that their place remained the same. Its situation gave it many advantages, and it generally came off with an ascen- dency from the petty wars, in which it was engaged. But it sometimes changed masters, and that with equal advantage to itself and its neighbors. Numa, the second king of Rome, was a Sabine, and from a city called Cures/ From his time, therefore, and in honor to the place of his nativity, the Roman people w(ire called Quiritcs. ^uma employed his whole reign in regulating the aiiairs of religion and government.^ He built several temples, among which was the celebrated temple of Janus, which was never to be shui but in time of peace. The Roman monarchy was elective pand we may clearly discern, in the elections of their kings/that spirit of liberty, which prevailed in all the ancient nations of Europe.- A man was quickly elevated or depressed by the voice of popular favor. In the early ages of (he world, Italy was peopled with a hardy race of men, wha^lived without govern- ment, without restraint, and without any social order, except what had grown spontaneously from the dic- tates of nature, and the force of habit.* Their tribes or clans were Jittle more than the connexions and dependencies of particular families, which had grown numerous, and were taught to combine and arm for ;he purposes of mutual defence, p'hey lived free in the w^oods, and roved over the plainsjjsubsistin^.upon * Tarquinius Priscus and Tarquinius Superbus, are in English, TQost generally called Tarquin the Elder and Tarquin the Proud. —Ed. 134 ROME. ihe fortune o^the chase.'^^ The country being highly favorable toeagriculture they were at length induced to choose out for themselves convenient settlements ; and this they did, as they were led by prospects of pleasure, honor, or advantage ; and the extensive country became at length settled, and divided into a great number of small independent states or sove- reignties, t^ach of these, tenacious of its rights, honors, and territories — ambitious of military fame, and thirsting for conquest, was continually seeking ad- vantage against all its neighbors. Hence arose per- petual wars, conquests and revolutions.. A city was a state, a republic, a kingdom, or an empire; every monarch was a general, and every citizen a soldier. A settlement of this description, founded by Ro- mulus, had for many years been seated on the banks of the Tiber. They had been repeatedly engaged in wars with their neighbors, and generally came oflf with advantage. Nor is it unlikely that they had during this period, outgrown the surrounding states, i?. "O'V^r, ^e-'^M^; n^Ucv, and general improvement. After Romulus, Ijx kings ^successively had ascended the throne, when in the reign of Tarquin^the Proud, an event took place, which caused a revolution in their government, and, probably, was the first step toward their future aggrandizement. Tarquin, the present monarch, to secure the crown in his own family, had murdered all the descendants of Tarquin the Elder, his grandfather, except Lucius Junius Brutus, the son of a daughter of that prince, who feigned himself an idiot, to escape the tyrant's rage, and who was, on that account, called Brutus, or the fool. Him, the king kept in his house, for the purpose of making sport for his children. Tarquin, by his cruel and haughty conduct, had acquired the surname of Superbus, or the Proud. He had waded to the throne through the blood of all the royal family, and every year of his reign was marked with acts of cruelty and oppressive viblence. His name was ROME. 1 55 become odious; and his people generally wished for nothing more than his downfall. This event, being intimately connected with the sudden elevation of the Roman stale, deserves a particular attention. Sextus, the king's son, while his father was at the head of the army, besieging Ardea, a neighboring city, violated the honor of Lncretia, a Roman lady of great spirit, and still greater virtue. The illustrious heroine survived the disgrace long enough to ac- quaint her husband and friends with her misfortune, and to entreat them, as they regarded her memory, to take vengeance on her destroyer. She then drew a poinard from her robe, and plunging it into her bosom, expired before their eyes. Collatinus, her husband, and her friends, stood round her, petrified with grief, and distracted with rage and despair. But their grief was for a moment arrested and turned into astonishment, when Brutus, the reputed fooi, seized the bloody dagger, and lifting it toward heaven, exclaimed, " Be witness, ye gods, that from this moment, 1 proclaim myself the avenger of the chaste Lucretia's cause; from this moment I declare myself the enemy of Tarquin, and his bloody house; henceforth my life, shall be employed in oppo- sition to tyranny, and for the freedom and happiness of my country." He then told tliem, that tears and lamentations must now give way to the sterner senti- ments of just revenge; and delivering them the poin- ard, still reeking with Lucretia's blood, caused each of them to swear the same oath, which he had sworn. The Roman people flocked together from all quar- ters, and were struck with horror at the deplorable spectacle ; and were equally amazed to behold the authority, and wisdom of Junius Brutus. The re- volt from the tvrant was general; and the senate passed a decreetpepriving the king of all authority, and banishing him and his family forever from the Roman state.lHe lived, however, to give his country- men much trouble ; for, though a detestable tyrant, 156 ROME. void of every principle of humanity and justice, yet he was bold, active, and vigorous, and found nfieans to excite frequent disturbances, and even to enkindle dangerous wars against his country. We have now passed over 245 years from the founding of the Roman state; and, in looking back on this period, we perceive few incidents particular- ly worthy to be drawn into this compend — nothing, which would reflect useful light on the character, or form useful combinations with the future history of the Romans. Like a single vessel, moving alone on the ocea.j, the Romans as yet remained wholly discon- nected with the atTairs and destinies of the great na- tions, of which we have spoken in former chapters. But during this period, the Assyrian empire had fall- en; Babylon was become a province of Persia; and Cyrus had exte nded his dominions from the Indian to the Atlantic ocean ; and a power was already prepared to eclipse forever th( glory of the Persians. Greece was now fast rising ; the morning of her brightest day evidently dawned. Before the fall of Tarquin, Milfiades, Leonidas and Themistocles were born. Diirlf g this period, also, the Jews, having experienced a captivity of 70 years, were restored by Cyrus, and had rrtarned, and rebuilt their temple at Jerusalem. It may not be improper to close this chapter by noticing to the reader, that, in most of the earlier dates, such as those of the founding of Athene, Thebes and Rome, the Trojan war, Homer, Hesiod, and many others, Dr. Priestly stands almost atone, making those ancient dates much later than most other chronologers. He has followed Sir Isaac N' w^ ton, whose plan, however, as the Doctor acknowl- edges, has not been adopted by any other chronoh'ger excepting himself. Newton's scheme avoids appa- rent inconveniencies ; particularly it remedies the noted anachronism of ^neas and Dido, and givfs those two celebrated personages an opportunity of becoming acquainted. But it is quite doubtful^ ROME. 1 67 whether the queen of Carthage would not rather choose, that the old chronology should remain in credit; which places them about a century apart. CHAPTER XV. THE ROMAN EMPIRE,* FROM THE EXPULSION OF TARQUIN TO THE CONQUEST OF CARTHAGE. THE great and vigorous spirit of Lucius Junius Brutus, displayed in avenging the death of Lucretia, may be regarded as a brilliant specimen of that pow- er and grandeur of mind, in which the Romans sur- passed all other nations, both ancient and modern. In variety of genius, and taste, the Greeks certainly excelled them ; but in a masculine boldness — in a grave, dignified, martial energy, the Romans were never equalled. Brutus and his associates were able to dethrone a powerful tyrant ; to abolish a mon- archy, which had existed several centuries ; and to organize and put in operation a new form of govern- ment, under which the Roman people rose to the sublimest heights of power, prosperity and splendor. The Roman government, during the reign of the kings, had, in its original spirit and design, embraced many of the principles of freedom. The king was assisted by a council, consisting of a hundred sena- tors, which number was increased at various times. These were men advanced in years, and venerable for their knowledge, prudence and integrity. The most important acts of government were generally sanctioned by an assembly of the people, or plebians, particular!) , acts relative to peace or war, the raising of money, the appointment of chief magistrates, and the election of the monarch. ^ The word empire is here used in its popular sense, to repre- sent merely government, or dominion, without reference to its 14 1 58 ROME. But the kings, and especially Tarquin, had, in a great measure, acted independently of all these salu- tary checks. To avoid these inconveniences, the kingly office was now abolished; and, in the place of it, two officers were substituted, styled consuls. Their power was nearly as great, as that of the king; but the division of it, and the frequency of election, iN'hich was once a year, were considered as sufficient checks. Junius Brutus and Coildtinus, the husband of the celebrated Lucretia, were first chosen con- suls. This new form of government was brought to the brink of ruin almost in the moment of its fornjation. The deposed monarch found means to organize a f the plunder taken in the city of Veil ; and they appointed a day, on which he was to appear before :he people in his own defence. Conscious of his in- nocence, yet disdaining the mortifying indignity of sustaining a public trial before a people, whom he lad laid under such high obligations, and whose re- jentment, he knew, had rather sprung from their Bnvyofhis virtue, than from any other cause, he ook leave of his friends, and evaded the approach- ing storm by going into voluntary exile. The triumph of the tribunes and the plebians, on he fall of this great man, was of short duration. A itorm far more terrible menaced the whole state, then he had fled to escape. We have, in a former chapter, had occasion to ■nention the Scythian hordes, which, in ancient :imes, inhabited the wilds of Europe and Asia — ^hich, like an inundation, at various times, flowed 3own upon the more civilized nations; or, like swarms ^f locusts, seemed to darken the sun and the air. rhe ancient inhabitants of Germany and France re- jcmbled thorn in those respects, in which they were most formidable. France was then called Gaul, rhe Gauls were men of great size and strength. rhey were exceedingly bold, fierce, and terrible in ivar. It is said, that even a glance of their eye wag 50 terrible, as to dismay and affrighten armies. A numerous body of these had, two centuries before this, crossed the Alps, and settled in the northern 168 ROME. parts of Italy ; and had long been a terror to all the country. Brennus, their warlike chieftain, was at this time at tlieir head,hesiegingClusium, a city of Etruria. The martial spirit of the Romans being roused at so near an approach of this hostile nation, and being earnestly solicited by that city to send them aid, they dispatched ambassadors to Brennus, to demand of him, what right he had to invade that city. The Gaul sternly replied, that the " rights of valiant men lie in their swords ;" and demanded, in return, what right the Romans had to the many cities they had conquered. The ambassadors, displeased witli the haughty style of Brennus, and most certainly, on this occasion, either forgetful or ignorant of their duty, immediately entered the city, and took an active part in the war. Brennus was enraged at the conduct of the am- bassadors, and forthwith raising the siege of Clusium, he marched directly to Rome, probably glad of a pretence for effecting a preconcerted measure. Rome had now stood 364 years, and had been a republic 119. Its territories were considerably ex- tended ; and the city^ itself was become opulent, splendid and powerful. The neighboring cities had fallen under its power; and those more distant were willing either to pay homage for their independejice, or seek the alliance of the Romans. The Gallic king could not but believe, that if he conquered Rome, the empire of Italy would follow of course; and per- haps one much greater. It will be remembered, that the Gauls, about this time, attempted both Greece and Asia, and that with considerable success. From the former, they were expelled by Sosthenes; and from the latter, by Antiochus Soter; as noticed ia our view of Greece and Syria. The Romans were apprised of the approaching danger, and sent an army, composed of the flower of their republic, to mef^t and oppose the Gauls. An obstinate and bloody battle was fought, in which the HOME. 167 omans xvrre iitterlj d^^fealrd, and t^eir army de- ro}rd. BrfMinus, elsted with vict(;ry, and siill eathing rcveneje and fury, continued his march to- ards Romo. In a word, he entered the city wi-hout sistance, I)urnt it to the ground, and put the inhnhi- nts to (he sword. Nothing seemed now to rerDain the Roman state capable of defending itself, but the d'-brafed rapitol ; were a body of the bravest of e Romans h( hi out against evri j effort of the Gauls, rennu?. at hiiiith, grew weary of th.e siege, and 'oposed to the Romans, that if they would pay him )e thousand pounds vveie:ht of gold, he would draw r his arnij, and give them no further trouble. They icppted the proposal, and the gold was produced, ut while it was weighing, some of the Gauls at- mpted to kick the beam, to prevent a just weight, he Romans complained of so flagrant an injustice ; it Brennus immediately cast his sword into the ilance, and gave them to understand, that their miplaints would be useless — that they must think 'nothing but compliance with the will of their im- ?rious conqueror. At that moment, intelligence ^vns brought, that amillus, the general, whom they hod so unjustly mished, was approaching at the head of an army, e had heard of the calamities of his country; and, jving raised a body of forces, was so fortunate, as to rive at that critical moment, when his presence as necessary, and his exertions effertual, to the sal- ition of his country. Camillus entered the place, here the business was transacting, aad immediately •dtTcd the Ronians to fake back the gold, whence was brought ; telling Brennus, with an air as haugh- ' as that of the barbarian, that the Romans were in le usj not to purchase peace with money, but with on. The presence of this great man revived thedroop- g spirits of his countr^mrn. They ral'ied round s standard ; and encounteiing the barbarians with 1^8 ROME. the most resolute bravery, defeated and almost en- tirely cut them off. Thus Rome was delivered from the most dangerous enemy, if we except Hannibal, that she was to see for many ages. The Roman people, in these ancient times, ex- hibited the strangest mixture of bravery, superstition, barbarity, discipline, enthusiasm, levity and wisdom. They were cont'viually engaged in war, and were generally succes^fal. But tlie drej^dTuI chastisement they received frf.m the hand of Brennus and the GauU, was attended by coi^sequences as lusting, as deplorable. Their territories, still but small, were ravaged ; their rity laid in asbes ; many of their bravest men kilb'd in battle; and their resources severely drained, tnough not exhausted : for their re- sources, as yet, were not ajouey, nor strong fortresses, nor large territories, nor nnmberi^, nor powerful al- lies. Their resources consisted in firm, determined spirits ; great souls, fearless of danger or of death ; minds strong, bold, intrepid and persevering. To brave danger was to them the fiehi of glory ; and their only alternative was death or victory. '^I'hey enjoyed victory or endured defeat with equal moder- ation ; and this they were able to do beyond any other nation ; because nature had endued them with independent, unconquerable minds, and with invinci- ble bravery and magnanimity. After the invasion of the Gauls, the Romans rose more experienced, more warlike, more formidable, then ever. We soon see them engaged in a war with the Samnites, the most powerful nation then in Italy. This war lasted many years, and was attended with various turns of fortune ; and when it was likely to terminate in complete victory and triumph on the side of the Romans, an event took place, which seemed once more to threaten the existence of the Roman nation. The Samnites, overpowered by the bravery and discipline of the Romans, sent for aid to Pyrrhus, the ROME. 169 eVhrated kine of Epirus, of whom we have already aktn some notice. It was generally thought impos- ihle for the Romans to contend successfully with his great commandt r. He had been fornned in the ,rt of war, upon (he maxims and examples of Alex- nder and Epaminondas; and notwithstanding the iegencracy of fhe Greeks and Asiatics, from whoni he military spirit had long smce departed, had been tble to inspire the armies he commanded with his )vvn heroic virtues. He had found no equal in Egypt ►r Asia. Happy would it have been for him, had le pursued more closely the footsteps of Alexan- ler, and especially had he kept at a distance from taly ; though even that might not have saved him rom a collision with the growing power of the Romans. Pyrrhus immediately prepared to answer the re- [uest of the Samnites. He embarked from Epirus, vith an army of twenty thousand foot and three thou- and horse, and twenty elephants ; but in crossing the Adriatic sea, his floet was dispersed in a storm, and nany of his vessels were lost. Although his arma- ncnt v.as greatly diminished, he still thought the xmnant more than a match for (he rude and barba- •ous people of Italy. His judgment of the Romans vas probably not dissimilar to that formed of the ^(lurican people before the revolutionary war ; at vhirh time some imagined, that a few thousand regu- ar troops would i^trike an awe through the continent, md that the semi-bnrbarians of the colonies would lever dare to face disciplined and veteran troops. But Pyrrhus found the Romans not so rude and barbarous, as he expected. The first view he had of heir military order and skill, struck him w-.ith sur- arise; and the first victory he gained, in all probabil- ity, utterly extinguished his hopes of subdumg the Romans. It is worthy of remaj'k how difForently the Romans received this invasion of Pyrrhus, from what the Persians did that of Alexander, Pyrrhus found J5 1 70 ROME- the Romans ready to receive him ; and when he of- fered to mediate between them and the Samnites, he was answered by Lsevinus, the consul, that the Ro- man people neither respected him as a mediator, nor feared him as an enemy. The first batde was fought on the banks of the river Lyris. Pjrrhus drew up his army with the ut- most skill ; nor was there a want of skill and discern- ment in the order and movements of the Romans : and here was first seen contrasted the Grecian pha- lanx with the Roman legion : nor have the ablest tacticians been positive in determining Vv'hich, on all accounts, was preferable. The loose array of the legion gave celerity to its evolutions, and certainly admitted of various conveniences ; but the close and firm strength of the phalanx, by cundensing the physical force, rendered its impression more certain, and its shock more dreadful. The field, on both parts, was managed with great skill, and was fought with the most determined bra- very. Motives of safety and ofhonor v/rought pow- erfully with both generals, and both armies : and it is probable, that few battles have been more severe. But the Greeks at length prevailed ; and Pyrrhus by the aid of his elephants, which \Ycre sent among the Romans, gained a complete victory. The Romans were put to flight, leaving fifteen thousand men dead on the field of battle. But the loss of Pyrrhus w^as not much inferior: insomuch, that, while some were congratulating him on account of his victory, he is said pathetically to have exclaimed, that another such victory would ruin him. Pyrrhus once more tried the virtue of negociation. He sent Cineas, a man of great eloquence, who had been the scholar of Demosthenes, ambassador to Rome. But this attempt, like the former, was with- out success. The Romans were deaf to all proposals of accommodation short of Pyrrhus's retiring out of Italy, Neither eloquence nor bribery, neither ROME. 171 threats nor persuasions, could produce any effect on that haughty, determined people. The war was therefore renewed with great vigor on both sides ; and various battles were fought, with more success to the Romans; till at length Pyrrhus was totally de- feated and his army cut in pieces. Giving up all hopes, therefore, of effecting any thing against so brave and powerful an enemy, he was forced to em- bark in haste, and leave his allies to the inevitable fate of subjugation by the victorious Romans. Pyr- rhus, however, left a garrison in the city of Taren- tum, and advised the Tarentines to support their cause with what vigor they could, till he could have time to levy more forces in Greece, and return. But he probably had little expectation of ever returning to those shores, where he had experienced so severe a reverse of fortune. It is certain he never did re- turn j nor did he ever seem to recover the current of his former good fortune. The Tarentines, who had been the principal lead- ers in the war of the Samniles, were now left to struggle with the Romans ; nor would the struggle have been long, had they not made application for aid to another foreign power. While the garrison left by Pyrrhus, tyrannized in the city, and the Ro- mans were masters of the country round them, they applied to the Carthaginians for succour, as their last and only resort. We have already made mention of the Cartha- ginians. As early as the invasion of Greece by Xerxes, they were powerful both by sea and land ; and furnished, according to some writers, an army of 300,000 men, who operated in conjunction with the Persians. They were willing, it appears, to in- terfere with the Romans, of whose growing power they had long been jealous. They soon drew a powerful fleet into the harbor of Tarentum, with a view to check the progress of the Roman arms. It had not, however, the desired effect. The Romans 172 ROME. found means to corrupt and bring over Ibe garrfeoti to their interest ; in consequence of which the city was taken, its walls and fortifications demolished, and the inhabitants were granted their liberty, and pro- tection from the Romans. The military spirit, as we have seen in the former part of this compend, passed from the Assyrians to the Persians, from them to the Greeks, and from the Greeks to the Carthaginians. Though the origins of Rome and Carthage, according to many writers, were not very far distant, in point of time, yet the latter rose first to consequence ; and w hile Rome was only a single city, and the Romans an obscure horde, the Carthaginians, by their fleets, kept the shores of the Mediterranean in awe. possessed the islands of that sea; had, in fact, passed the straits of Gibraltar; coasted down the African peninsula, and up the shores of Europe, through the British channel; and, it is thought, had reached the coasts of Norway, if not even the shores of the Baltic sea. They form one of the numerous proofs, and one not the least splendid, of the power and consequence, which com- merce will give a nation. We shall here digress a moment, by giving a brief sketch of the rise and greatness of Carthage ; a power, which held a long and doubtful contest with Rome for empire ; nor would she have failed in that contest, if while her fleets and armies were victorious. abroad, she had not been weakened by disunion, and rent by factions at home. Carthage was founded by a colony from ancient Phoenicia, a country lying at the east end of the Mediterranean, whose chief cities were Tyre and Sidon. If we might rely on Virgil's authority, this famous city was founded by Dido, the sister-in-law of Pygmalion, king of Tyre, about the time of the destruction of Troy. According to the story of the Latin poet, ^neas, the Trojan prince, who had escap- ed the ruins of his country, w^as driven by a storm ROME. 1 73 on the coast of Africa, and there had an interview with Dido, the founder and queen of Carthage. That virtuous and lovely queen, whose constancy to the memory of her husband Sicha3us, even surpass- ed the fame of Penelope, received the fugitive Tro- jans, rescued them from the utmost distress, and pro- tected them from the barbarous customs of the hostile people, on whose shores they were cast. To reward her for this, a plot was laid in heaven, among the principal deities, for her destruction. Cupid the god of love, was sent down to assume the form of Asca- nius, the son of ^Eneas, to inflame the passions of Dido, while Venus lent all her aid to the hero him- self. So soon as the powers of heaven combined, had enabled him to triumph in the most complete seduction of his benefactress, Mercury comes flying down in all haste to apprise him, that it is now time to be gone. And, like all other villains, whose triumph over innocence is followed with indiflerence and disgust, he hastens away. The queen, unable to bear his enormous ingratitude and peerless atro- city, kills herself in despair. Did it accord with the temper and genius of Virgil to make his favorite hero the instrument of such dis- tress and destruction to innocence and virtue ? Did he think, it would do honor to the gods of his country to father upon them as dark a plot, as ever was fabri- cated in hell ? Did he think it would be an additional gem in the diadem of iEneas, to make him trample on the virtue of the Tyrian queen? Or, in a word, did he imagine, that, by the introduction of his wonted machinery, a veil of sanctity would be thrown over the whole, and cover all its deformities? But, though it would seem extraordinary, that Virgil should, through ignorance or choice, fall into such a glaring anachronism, yet it is certain, that the best authorities place the founding of Carthage at a great distance from the destruction of Troy. Ac- cordipg to the opinion of the learned Bochart, the 15* 174 ROME* city of Carthage was bnilt about the time of Josbaa's conquest of Canaan. The territories of Tyre and Sidon were allotted to the tribe of Asher; and many of the Phoenicians, at that time, to avoid a war of extermination, wpnt on board their vessels, and sought for new establishments. A company of them landed and made a settlement on the African shore, a few miles from where the city of Tunis now stands* There they laid the foundatirjn of Carthage. But this was two centuries and a half before the siege of Troy. Bochart, in this opinion, has followed the best ancient authorities ; and he has been followed by the ablest chronologers since his time, who, more- over, fix the emigration of Dido to the African shore nearly two centuries and a half after the Trojan war,. The Carthaginiansj descended from a people, whom long voyages and extensive commerce had rendered enterprising and bold, followed the footsteps of their mother country ; and soon went far beyond her. Their commerce, which embraced almost every species of traffic, extended to all parts of the known world. Their ships were in the Mediterranean and Ked seas, and in many parts of the Indian and At- lantic oceans. But we cannot notice here their wars and revolu* tions. They seem however not to have interfered much with the great monarchies of Asia ; and it is certain, that their power by sea was, in general, their security against invasion. The first notice, we have taken of them, was in the invasion of Greece by Xerxes. Him they furnished with an army to invade Sicily ; which invasion, by means of weakness in the directing head, proved unfortunate in all its parts. But Sicily, however, and most other islands in the Mediterranean, soon after that invasion, fell under the power of Carthage Under the name of a republic, the Carthaginians were generally governed by a set of powerful men,, ^ho, oever wanted for means to procure their owa ROME. 1 76 appointment to the most important offices. Nor can it be said, that Carthage ever enjoyed the free and independent spirit of Rome. The government and policy of the Carthaginians, as indeed of all the ancient nations, was interwoven with their religion. For the sake of illustrating this hy example, I have inserted a passage from Rollin's Ancient History, which he has taken from Polybius. The passage is found in the words of a treaty between the Carthagiiiians and the king of Macedon, and will show ii« the solemn manner in which their treaties were formed. *' This treaty was concluded in the presence of Jupiter, Juno and Apollo; in the pres- ence of Daiu.(Jiios, of the Carthaginians, of Hercules, and iolaus ; in the presence of Mars, Triton, and Neptune ; in the presence of all the confederate gods of the Carthaginians, and of the sun, moon and earth ; in the presence of the rivers, meads and waters ; in the presence of all those gods, who pos- sess Carthage." The government of Carthage, much like that of the Rom.nn republic, consisted of three orders. The Suffctes, of which there were two, answered in most particulars to the consuls of Rome. Thej were ap- pointed annually, and are called sometimes kings, dictators or consuls. Their power was great. The Senate consisted of men most remarkable for wisdom and prudence, and formed their council of state. Their number is not known. The whole body of the people composed the lower order. But the peo- ple generally submitted all matters of government to the senate. Towards the conquest of Carthage, however, by the Romans, the people grew turbulent, factious and rebellious, and being led by aspiring demagogues, they interfered ; and finally .subverted the state. In general, their government was sufS- ciently virtuous to give securitj to private property, and consequently (o promote industry and enterprise i but it was frequently cruel, tyrannical, tuniulluary 116 ROME, and impolitic. When Hannibal was upon the point of conquering Rome, a faction in the senate of Car- thage mined him. But there must be a cause for the dissolution of all governments, states and empires. Even Rome, after having flourished her day, fell into disorder, confusion, weakness and ruin. The Romans were now masters of Italy ; an ex- tensive, fertile, and in many parts, a populous coun- try. We have now no means of coming at the pro- bable number of inhabitants ; but Italy now sus- tains twenty millions of people, notwithstanding the great degeneracy of morals and want of industry, which prevail in that country. From various cir- cumstances, which attract our notice in the Punic war, we may saft ly conclude, that Italy then con- tained several millions of people. The resources of the two powers we are now coft- siderinff, were very different, but very great. Car- thage, oy extensive and prosperous commerce, had amassed the wealth of the world. She abounded in gold and silver, and in every species of valuable, ele- gant and luxurious merchandise. She had also an immense population. The northern shores of Africa were then the granary of the world ; they were full of people ; they were the fruitful nursery of armies; and the number of their vessels was prodigious. But the Africans, at this time, were neither inebriated by luxury, nor yet enervated by their warm climate. They had powerful armies; and it was their good fortune to have a number of great generals, who were perhaps never surpassed in some essential points of the military character. They were crafty, intrepid, brave ; and especially they were impetuous and almost irresistible in their modes of attack. The Romans were as yet poor ; they were actuated by patriotism and love of glory. Their courage was cool, but firm and unshaken ; and was always most thoroughly roused by the greatest danger. They were inured to hardships, and were, in one word, a ROME. 177 nation of soldiers: for, as Cineas told Pyrrhus, that every one of their senators was fit for a king, so he might also have said, that every one of iheir soldiers was fit for a general. Such being the contending parties. It will not be thought extravagant, when we observe, that the con- test between Rome and Carthage was conducted with the firmest spirit, and the greatest resolution ; that it was the mo5t equally matched, and vigorously fought ; in short, that it was the most severe, w^hether we re- gard the extremity, extent, or duration of its opera- tions ; and the most illustrious, whether we regard the characters concerned, or the consequences which followed, of any found in the annals of history : for, in this contest, the two greatest powers in the world were engaged ; and it was certain, that whoever was victorious miist remain without a rival. The expulsion of P) rrhus from Italy, and reduction of the Samnites and Tarentum, completed the subju- gation of Italy, and left the Romans masters of the garden of Europe. They must now find new fields of glory. The prospect northward was uninviting. There lay the Alps and the fierce nations of Gaul. Eastward lay Greece, separated from them by the Adriatic sea, which was possessed by the fleets of Carthage. Sicily, divided from them only by a nar- row strait, allured them by its immense riches, and was easy of access; but there the grasping power of Carthage had already unfurled its victorious stand- ard. Hiero, king of Syracuse, was engaged in a war with the Mamertines, a small Sicilian state; and being hardly pressed, he called in the Carthaginians to his aid, who presently furnished him with prompt assist- ance by sea and land. The Mamertines, seeing themselves thus overmatched, icnmediatel}' sent to the Roman senate, and put t'jemselves under the protection of the Romans. The senate, still mindful of the interference of the Carthaginians in the siege 178 Rome:. of Tarentura, determined now on a trial of strengthj and without further delay, declared war against Car- thage. Thus commenced what is commonly called the first Punic war.* It was soon perceived by the Romans, that any ad- vantages they might gain in Sicily over their adver- saries, could neither be very important, nor perma- nent, so long as their adversaries were masters of the seas. As chimerical as it might seem, they deter- mined to remove this impediment. Their own im- mense peninsula furnished them with numberless harbors ; their forests afforded them timber ; their gpnius promised them skill; and their hardy sons might easily become excellent seamen. About the same time a Carthaginian vessel falling into their hands, they took it as their model, and went without delay to building a fleet. In a short time, a fleet was built and equipped for sea. Of this naval armament Daillius took the command ; and immediately putting to sea, he encountered and defeated one of the prin- cipal fleets of Carthage, sinking or destroying fifty of their ships. A victory so brilliant and so unexpected, and achieved by the infant navy of Rome, gave man- kind new ideas of the capacity and genius of the Ro- man people. But we cannot descend to a minute detail of particular events. The Romans, having gained several advantages both by sea and land, de- termined without delay to carry the war into Africa, in hopes of terminating it by one decisive effort. They soon fitted out a fleet more powerful than the former, and prepared to make a descent upon the coast of Africa. This army was commanded by Re- gulus, at that time considered the greatest general in Rome ; a man eminent for integrity, bravery and all the virtues of the patriot and hero. Regulus was no 1 sooner at sea, than he was met by the fleets of Car- * The wars between the Carthaginians and Romans, are called Punic wars, because the ancient Carthaginians were Phenician's. —Ed. ROME. 179 bage. A battle ensued, in which the Romans canne )jrt with conripleie victory and triumph. Thej land- ed, and encountering an army composed of the flower )t Carihnge. once more obtained a signal victory, n consequence of which, many towns and cities sub- nitted to the Roman army. Such a series of severe lefeats and heavy losses tilled Carthage with grief, error and astonishment; and it was apprehended, hat the Romans would immediately complete the :onquest of Africa. But It should be remembered, that the histories of hese transactions were generally written by Roman 3ens. Allowance must, therefore, be made for such flosses and colorings, as might be expected from a people, unwilling to acknowledge the military merit )f other nations. The Carthaginians, in this extrem- ty, sent to Lacedenion, and requested Xantippus, a celebrated Grecian general, to command their armies. Their request was granted ; and the almost desperate iffairs of Carthage assumed a new form. I This brave and gallant commander soon appeared it tlie head of an army ; gave battle to the Romans ; defeated them with dreadful slaughter, and Regulus, .he Roman general, was taken prisoner. It is re- narked by some, that events either fortunate or dis- istrnus, seldom come alone. This remark holds u,ood m the present case; and fortune seemed now willing, for a while, to shift sides. The Roman senate, almost at once, received intelligence of the loss of Regulus md his army, of the total loss of their fleet in a storm it sea, and of the capture of Agrigentum, their chief ;own in Sicily, by Kasthalo, the Cartfiaginian gene- ral. Having put another fleet to sea, it was also iriven ashore and wrecked in a storm. Jt may be presumed, that the fleets of those times rvere but poorly built and equipped to resist the dan- gers of the sea ; and if to this idea we add that of heir ignorance of the art of navigation, it is matter if wonder, how they accoiiplished what they cer- 1$0 ROME. tainly did on the sea. To perform long voyages without a compass, must be attended with continual perplexity and danger. Ti:ie Romans discovered this to thpir cost : and Eutropius remarks, that they were so disgusted and chagrined with these disasters at sea, that they in a measure abandoned forever all naval enterprises. But their prosperity on the land was ultioMtply more than a counterbalance. They al- ways, however, had ships mough to transport their arnjies wherever they wished to send them ; and they did in fact after this, gain several victories over the Carthaginians at sea. ReguUis, in the mean time, was thrown into a dun- geon, where he lay some years, while the war pro- gressed with vigor, but with no material advantage on either side. At length, however, as the bravery of the Romans was fatigued, and the treasures of Car- thage no less exhausted, the Carthaginians thought it a favorable time to propose conditions of peace. To- gether with their own ambassadors, they also sent Regulus home upon parole of honor, exacting from him a promise, that he would return, provided the Romans did not accept of their conditions. The con- duct of Regulus, on this occasion, has been justly cel- ebrated through all succeeding ages. Although he knew, that the severest torments awaited his return to Carthage, yet, as the guardian of the honor of his countrj'^, he suffered no private consideration to in- fluence his conduct. He strenuously opposed a peace, but upon terms as humbling to Carthage, as they were advantageous and honorable to Rome. The great and noble spirit, he manifested, revived the courage of his countrymen, and determined them to prosecute the war. But as for himself he return- ed to Carthage, and was put to death with the most dreadful and lingering torments. This he foresaw, and laid down his life voluntarily for the good of his country. Patriots, like Regulus, are as scarce, as ihose are plenty, who, in the midst of the most pom- ! ROME. 181 pous professions, v;ould sell or sacrifice their country, to advance tht'ir own private interest. After the death of Regains, the atlairs of Carthage experienced an evident and rapid decline; and the Roman arms prevailed in all directions, till the Car- thaginians found it necessary to make peace on the most dishonorable terms. These were, that they should evacuate Sicily and the ncighhoring islands; give up all their prisoners and deserters without ran- som ; keep all their ships of war at a distance from the Roman dominions; never make war with the Roman allies; pay down a thousand talents of silver, and two thousaiid and two hundred more, in ten years. To these conditions Carthage acceded ; and thus ended the thst Funic war, in the year 513 from the building of the city. The Romans themselves were willing at this time to take breath ; for though, in this war, they had generally the advantage, yet it was an advantage dearly bought; and tliey often perceived the balance to fluctuate; soinetimes to turn against them. In- deed, their scene of operations was wide; their ex- ertions extreme and long continued, in combatting a great and powerful people, who, though less warlike, certainly possessed superior resources. At this period, while Rome enjoyed profound peace, and the temple of Janus was shut, several events took place strongly connected with the chain of causes, which was to elevate her to the summit of empire and glory. A passion for elegant literature, for the first time, be- gan now to appear; particularly the Grecian drama began to take place of the low, wretched and smutty satire, as it was called, which hitherto had only been known at Rome ; and, from this period, the strong genius of Rome labored perpetually upon Grecian models. They never could equal their masters in dramatic composition ; but, in many other species of writing, they not only equalled, but excelled; and even merited the honor of inventing several of theif own. 16 182 ROME, Between the first and second Punic wars, the tem- ple of Janus did not continue long shut. The fierce and barbarous nations of Gaul, judging it now a con- venient time, when the Ronr^an armies were disband- ed, and the spirit of war seemed quiet, once more to make an attempt upon Italy, they crossed the Alps, and poured down in an immense swarm into the fruit- ful country of Etruria, But they learned their error, when too late. They were surrounded and cut in pieces almost to a man. Viridomarus, their king, was slain by the hand of t])e celebrated Marcellus, who was called the szoord of Rome, They, as might be expected, begged and obtained a peace. The Carthaginians, who had been compelled by ne- cessity to accept the most inglorious terms of peace, were now measurably recovered from the calamities of an unfortunate war, and determined once more on a trial of strenth with the great and formidable pow- er of Rome. They were, indeed, excited and roused to this measure by one of the most extraordinary men, who has ever appeared in the Vvorld. Hannibal, on whom the comiDand of the second Pusiic war devolv- ed, had been, (lom his chiidiioi)d, a sworn enemy to the Romans. It is said, lliat when he was but nine years old, his father, Handlcar, who was himself a great and skilful general, caused him to take a solemn oath, never to be in friendship with the Romans. The Carthaginians began the war by besieging Saguntum, a city in Spain, in alliance with the Ro- imans. An embassy was immediately despatched to Carthage, complaining of this infraction of an ex- isting treaty. This remonstrance failing of success, both sides once more prepared for war, in a manner suited to the greatness of the contending parties. Hannibal, who was then in Spain, sent a part of liis forces into Africa, left another part under the command of Asdrubal, his brother, to carry on the war in Spain, and at the head of about 50,000 select troops, and a formidable body of cavalry, as stated b^ ROME. 183 Cornelius "D^epos, he directed his march toward Italy. Out of Spain, he passed over the Pyrenean moun- tains into Gaul, where he encountered and dispersed the barbarous and hostile tribes, who opposed him- He crossed tiie Alps with his army, an enterprise, considering that it was performed in the dead of winter, truly stupendous and astonishing. Since the heroic achievements of Hercules, no army had ever crossed those lofty ridges, where vast declivities, frightful steeps and dreary wastes, received in suc- cession, the adventurous traveller; where nature's Toughest aspect derived additional horrors from the ravages of winter; and the frequent and desperate attacks of fierce savages, issuing from the caverns and grottos of these inhospitable rocks, increased the dangers of every step. This arduous enterprise was accomplished in about two weeks, but with the loss of nearly half the army. But nothing could repress the ardor of Hannibal. He was now on the plains of Italy ; he must conquer or die. The Romans, who carefully watched Hannibal's motions, received intelligence by the swiftest cou- riers, that he was crossing the Alps at the head of a powerful army. So bold an enterprise, likely to be attended with important consequences, excited con- siderable sensations at Rome. But what could the Romans fear? The bravest nation in the world, skill- ed in the art of war by the experience of ages, they had triumphed over every enemy : even Pyrrhus, the greatest general of his time, could not stand be- fore them. And in a former war, they had, at the gates of Carthage, prescribed to her, conditions of peace. But now they were far more powerful, by increase of numbers, wealth and experience. But we cannot particularize the events of this war. Hannibal first defeated Scipio, Who met him near the river Po, with a numerous array, soon after he had entered Italy. A few days after this, he encountered 184 ROME. another arniv, commanded by Scmpronius, on the feanks of the Trebia. This army he routed with great slaughter. The third army, commanded by Flamin- ius, he cut oflT near the lake of Thrasymcne. The news of these successive defeats, spread consterna- tion and dismay tlirout;h Italy ^ and many of the Cisalpine Gauls immediately declared for Hannibal, and flocked to his standard. And the Sicilians, who found that masters near at hand were more to be feared than at a distance, now generally shewed a disposition to join the conqueror. In this alarming stale of things, the mighty genius of Rome, which never failed to open to her new resources, suggested a means of checking the rapid progress of Hannibal. Fabius Maximus v/as appoii^t- ed dictator, a m.an of great subtilty and craft, as well as an able and experienced commander. To him, was committed, as to the last resort, the defence of the republic ; and he undertook that arduous task, by a mode of warfare hitherto unknown to the Ro- mans, but since their time often practised with suc- cess ; and by no one more illustriously than by him, who may be styled the shield of the American people. The Romans could bring no force into the field, which could stand before Hannibal. Fabius, there- fore, endeavored to keep out of his way, but to watch his motions; to hover about him ; cut off his foraging parties ; to disturb and weaken him by indirect means; to harass at one time his van, and at another, his rear; and especially to let no opportunity slip of annoying him, or, as it might happen, of gaining a signal advantage. And in pursuing this system, he in fact gained several considerable advant.Mges, and at length inclosed him in a place, from whence lie could not extricate himself without difficulty and danger. But no inclosures were sufficient long to detain him, whom no force could withstand, when at liber- ty. By a stratagem, he outwitted even Fabius, aiid ROME. ^ tZB gained once more (he open country. And now the calamities of Ron.e seemed drawing toward their crisis. The command of Fabius expiring, Terentius Varro, a man of rash, impetuous courage, was ap- pointed in his place, who advanced against Hannibal with 90,000 men, the flower and strength of Italy. Superiority of numbers, honor, shame, courage, the ancient fortune and glory of Rome — in short, resent- ment, rage and despair, all seemed to unite their in- fluence upon the minds of the Romans, and to lead them on to victory and vengeance. They fought, and were cut in pieces almost to a man. Fifty, some say seventy, thousand were left dead on the field of battle; and it is said, that three bushels of gold rings were sent to Carthage, which were drawn from the fingers of Roman knights. Hannibal has been generally, perhaps justly, cen- sured for not immediately investing Rome. Indeed some historians relate, that Maherbal, one of his principal officers, told him at the time, " that he knew how to conquer, but not how to improve his victory ; and that if he would march immediately to Rome, in three days they should sup in the capital." It ap- pears, that Hannibal had at this time but about 40,000 foot forces, and not half that number of cavalry. If this be true, it would seem a sufficient reason for his delaying the siege of Rome. Although many Ro- mans had been killed in the war, yet there were vast numbers remaining; and of their courage, he had no reason to doubt. Had Carthage at this mo- ment invaded Italy with several other armies ; had she furnished Hannibal with three times the number of men he had, which she might have done, Rome might have been conquered. But while Hannibal was victorious in Italy, the government of Carthage was embarrassed, distracted, and rent by factions. Immediately after the battle of Cannas, Hannibal despatched his brother Mago, to Carthage, to carry an account of bis decisive victory, and to demand 16* 1^ ROME. more troops, in order to complete the reduction of Rome. But alas ! what can equal the blindness and rage of popular fury ? Hanno, a powerful dema- gogue in the senate of Carthage, ever bent on frus- trating the measures of Hannibal, prevailed against the request of Mago. And although an order was given for the raising of 24,000 foot and 4,000 horse, yet when those forces were levied in Spain, they were^sent another Vay, and never acted in that di- rection, where their aid would probably have ena- bled Hannibal to finish the war. Nor is this the only instance, where ambitious men have sacrificed their country, and even themselves to their own party views. Instead of wondering, thn; Hannibal did not imme- diately conquer Rome, nothing, indeed, can be rrtore astonishing, than that he was able, with an army re- duced to about 24,000 to maintain his ground for many years. Hannibal, however, carried on the war, and kept possession of the finest parts of Italy, for upwards of fifteen years. But the country was large, and the Romans, taught by adversity, and being fully recov- ered from their first consternation, found means to evade his impetuous valor, and make eifectual oppo- sition, without hazarding general battles. Rome owed its ultimate deliverance to several great men* Fabius, Marcellus, and Scipio, afterwards surnamed Africanus, led the Roman armies, and managed their affairs with equal courage and prudence. Though they could not drive Hannibal out of Italy, they led armies into Spain and Sicily, and finally into Africa, where the war became so threatening, that the Car- thaginians were obliged to recal Hannibal, to defend their own dominions. Hannibal returned, but too late. The Carthaginians were too far gone, to be rescued by mortal prowess. Historians have generally allowed, that Alexander was .the first of warriors. But if they allow the Ro ROME. iSt mans to have been the most warlike of the ancient nations, it will be difficult to say, why Alexander should take precedency of Hannibal. What com- parison could the Persians bear with the Romans? Hannibal, it is true, did not conquer Italy ; but what did he do ? He defeated, and nearly destroyed, four principal armies in succession. His own army was not large, nor was it recruited. The Gauls and other people in Italy, who espoused his cause, were not to be depended on ; and of his own regular force, there must have been a constant diminution. Many of the bravest Roman generals, he slew; their most wise and crafty he outwitted ; and their greatest and most consummate, he out-generalled. In the field, he was more than a match for Marcellus, and in policy^ for Fabius. Even Scipio Africanus did not conquer him, till he was overpowered and crushed by for- tune. No one can deny, that in the times of the Punic- wars, the Romans were far better soldiers than the Carthaginians ; but that they ever had an abler general, there is reason to doubt. On HannibaPs leaving Italy, he found the affairs of his country in a situation nearly desperate. He had with him the remnant of those soldiers, with whom he had fought fifteen years in Italy ; but they were covered with scars; worn out with toils; and their spirits broken with labor, misfortune and dis- appointment ; nevertheless, he encountered Scipio the younger, whose army was far superior to his own, and did every thing which prudence and valor could do. He was overpowered and obliged to seek safety by flight. This was the end of the second Punic war. The Carthaginians were now wilting to make peace upon any terms; and the Romans dictated such terms, as they saw fit. But that unhappy people did not long enjoy the benefit even of a treaty, which, while it left them the name, deprived them, in reality^ of in» 188 KOME» dependence. The Romans renewed their exactions with the haughtiest tone of despotic insolence. Sub- mission was now in vain ; the miserable inhabitants of Carthage were ordered to leave their city, which was, by a decree of the Senate of Rome, condemned to be utterly demolished. Carthage, roused by de- spair, although by the most base and shameful treach- ery completely disarmed, now made her expiring ef- fort. The people shut their gates, fortified their walls and towers, and with incredible industry, fabri- cated such arms, as the time allowed. They -made a noble resistance. But the repeated and furious as- saults of a great and powerful army, could not long be resisted. The city was taken by storm, and together with its inhabitants, perished by fire and sword. Thus ended Carthage, one of the most renowned cities of antiquity, 146 years before Christ, 607 from the building of Rome, and above a thousand years from its foundation. But Hannibal, destined never to grace a Roman triumph, long survived the ruin of Carthage. Still retaining his enmity to the Romans, he maintained in every place the unequal struggle, endeavoring, by any means, to annoy them or to enkindle war against them. CHAPTER XYI. BRIEF HISTORICAL VIEW OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE, FROM THE FALL OF CARTHAGE TO THE REIGN OF COMMODUS, CONTAINING A PERIOD OF THREE HUNDRED AND TWELVE YEARS. IN the infancy of Rome, she had many wars, but few conquests ; in her maturity, she had (ew wars and mnny conquests. When the power of conquest failed, Rome no longer had a rival. Her wars, or rather invasions, after that event, were generally of ROME. 1 89 her own seeking'; and they were many. Rome was no sooner able to say, ^'Carthage must be destroy- ed," than, in her heart, she al^sQ said, The empire of Alexander shall be mine. First Macedon felt her grasp, and Perseus was hurled from the throne of Philip and Alexander; at which time she gracioasSy gave the Greeks their liberty, i. e. gave them law. Attains, king of Fergamiis, dying about this time, left his kingdom to the Romans, by will ; or, in other words, seeiiig the world sink beneath their power, he prefcired giving them a bloodless victory, and cloaked an ignoble dereliction of ri?:iht, under the specious name of a voluntary donation. Antioclius the Great, kin^r of Syria, was destined next to fall before them. He was at this period, the most pow- erful and opulent prince of all Alexander's succes- sors ; and had he accepted the advice and aid of Hannibal, there would have been al least a chance for his escaping the all-grasping power of Rome. Rut he, fearing lest, if any thing should be done, Hannibal would have ell the credit, was careful to go directly contrary to the advice of that general. The Romans defeated him almost without loss of blood; stripped him of a great part of his domin- ions; triumphed over him; extorted from him an immense tribute ; and left him only enough to grace the triumph of another campaign. Two other great cities shared the fate of Carthage, and nearly at the same time. Corinth,* one of the noblest cities of Greece, was utterly destroyed by Mummius, the consul, for offering some indignity to the Roman ambassadors ; and also Numantia, the capital of Spain. This city, after sustaining a siege of fourteen years, was reduced by Scipio. The in- habitants, being unable to liold out any longer, fired the city over their own heads, and all perished in the flames ; and Spain became a Roman province. * Cicero calls Corinth " Lumen tptius Grecise,!? the light «f »}] Greece, —Kd, 1 90 ROME. The corruption of the senate, and the sedition and fall of the Gracchi, together with various distur- bances, next arise to view, in tracing the hisiory of Rome. Then follow the reduction of Numidia, and the civil wars in the republic, excited by the ambi- tion of Marius and Sylla, which terminated in the perpetual dictatorship of the latter. But it will not comport with our present design to enter into a detail of these particular events. Rome was perhaps never more powerful or happy, than in the days of Scipio Africanus, or about the times of the Punic wars. She then experienced great misfortunes and calamities; but those untoward events, instead of weakening or exhausting her, call- ed forth, nay, even created, new energies. From the invasion of Hannibal, she rose invincible ; and while that consummate warrior held his ground in Italy, she sent armies into Spain, Africa, Greece and Macedon. A great part of those immense regions, which Alexander subdued, soon shared the fate of the empire of Carthage ; and in those days, with the Romans, to proclaim war was to insure a triumph ; and to invade, was to conquer. When we look for a period in the Roman history, in which there is the greatest union of power, wis- dom, virtue and happiness, it will doubtless be found not far from the times, of which we are now speak- ing. The Romans, in earlier times of the republic, were more virtuous and patriotic than now ; but then they were weak. In the Augustan age, they v^ere certainly more enlightened, scientific and polished; but then they were less brave ; or if not less brave, their virtue was forever gone, and with it, the foun- dation of their prosperity and happiness. The conquest of Africa, Asia and Greece, at once poured into the coffers of Rome immense, incalcula- ble riches. On this almost boundless tide of pros- perity, a set of men were soon seen floating, of a very different character from Cincinnatus, Fabriciui ROME. 191 and Regulus. To the most desperate bravery, they united unhouP(UH annbition ; and to the strongest expression of regard to their country, they united a total want of principle. Th-^ wealth of the world, like a mighty river, poured into Rome ; and many individuals acquired fortunes, which transcended royal magnificence. The elevation of Rome to such an astonishing height of power and splendor, drew to her, men of parts, of taste, of ambition and enterprise, and in short, men of every description, and almost every nation. The descendants of the ancient Romans, soon became few in comparison with the immense multitude, who by some means or other, acquired cit- izenship, or obtained a residence in Italy; and Rome herself experienced as great a change, as the nations she conquered. While she drew arts, elegance and science from Greece, she drew wealth, luxury, effem- inacy and corruption from Asia and Africa ; and she drew a swarm of hungjy fortune-hunters from every corner of the earth, wjio penetrated her inmost re- cesses ; outnumbcicd and overwhelmed her ancient people; in short, conquered their conquerors, cor- rupted their morah, and put a final period to their liberties. The civil wars of Rome, which soon followed the period of v*'hich we have been speakins", unfold to the reader, a spectacle equally dreadful and disgusting. Many persons, who had witnessed the destruction of Carthage, were still alive, and saw all Italy deluged in blood, by Marius and S} lia. From the destruc- tion of Carthage to the perpetual dictatorship of Syl- la, was a little rising of seventy years. During the latter part of this period, Lucius Sylla, envying the power and glory of Caius Marius, involved the re- public in a most bloody, disgraceful and destructive war. After various turns, which their affairs took in the progress of this eventful struggle ; after they bad destroyed half a million of men, including the 192 ROME. best part of the Roman people ; had humbled Rome and Italy; had shed the noblest blood, and prostrat* ed the dignil> of the republic, Sjlla, an execrable monster of cruelty, tjr./.iny and ambition, was able to triumph over virtue, liberty and justice. He seated himself quietly in the exercise of despotic power, and became perpetual dictator. Rome never saw another moment of freedom. The Romans, in the times of Scipio, may be com- pared with the Greeks in the time of Themistocles ; and the triumph of Greece over Persia, with that of Rome over Cai-thage. In both cases, the conquerors were corrupted by wealth, and inebriated by luxury. We might go further and say, that the Peloponnesian war, vvliich succeeded the elevation of Greece, and laid the foundation of her ruin, resembled the civil wars of Rome, begun by Marius and Sylla, carried on by Cesar and Potnpey, and terminated by Augus- tus. But the firmness of the Roman character, the nature of their civil policy, and the immense extent of their conquests, enabled them still to be powerful, in spite of all their corruptions ; and had they been otherwise, there seemed to be no nation near them, who could have derived advantage from their weak- ness. They seem to have been raised up and endow- ed with universal dominion, that they might evidence to the world, how far a nation can be happy, and how long she can exist, without virtue or freedom. The ambition of the demagogues, as well as of the despots and tyrants of Rome, in one essential article, led them to promote the true and jiist policy of the empire : that was to attach the provinces as strongly as possible to the interest of Rome; to dissolve them down to one common mass — to preserve their exten- sive territories entire ; to cement them together by various alliances; and to preserve the empire undi-' vided. The strength of empires consists in their union. The Greeks, wanting this, soon failed ; and, m our own times, Poland, which ought, from her ROME. 193 numerous advantages, to have been one of the most powerful kingdoms in the world, has exhibited a de- plorable spectacle of weakness and misery, by means of her internal divisions. Our own country had well nigh been swallowed up in the same gulf. The Roman community, launched at once on such a sea of luxury, wealth and glory, was variously i;f- fected. While all were struggling for eminence and power, it fortunately happened, that the reins of gov- ernment fell into strong and energetic hands. Of this description, generally speaking, were most of the first competitors, and of the triumvirates. The soft- ening power of luxury, the sudden inundation of Grecian elegance and refinement, and the elevation of conscious greatness and empire, combined with her native gravity in forming the genius of Rome. About this period, it began to bud ; soon after this> was its fairest bloom and richest maturity. If the genius of Rome was of a heavier mould than that of Greece, it possessed a more commanding gravity ; if it had less fire, it was more tranquil, majestic, and solemn ; and more hearts will vibrate with pleasure to the plaintive and elegant notes of the Roman, than to the electric fulminations of the Grecian muse. In the year 680 from the building of the city, the republic was freed from the tyranny of Sylla, by the death of that odious tyrant. But two men, of far more extensive views and refined ambition than either Marius or Sylla, were already prepared to run the same race. By various arts, as well as by great abilities, Cneus Pompey had become the most popular man in Rome, and was considered as the greatest commander in the republic. Crassus possessed that authority and influence, which great eloquence and immense wealth, combining with all the wiles of am- bition, could procure. He was the richest man in Rome. While Pompey, who warmly espoused the Marian faction, strove to gain the favor of the people, by 17 194 ROME. abrogating many of the tyrannical laws of Sylla, Crassus employed his amazing wealth in donations, distributions of corn among the poor, in public feasts and entertainments; and it is said, that he supported, at his own private expense, the greatest part of the citizens for several months ; expenditures sufficient to have exhausted the treasures of the greatest princes. In the progress of their contest for power, their ani- mosities broke forth on every occasion, in opposition more or less direct, and by means more or less violent. At this period, while the destinies of Rome seem- ed to hang in doubtful suspense, three characters ap- peared of very diiTerent complexions, but equally ex- traordinary, equally to be remembered, but with very different sensations, in posterity ; Catiline, Cicero, and Cesar. One of these men procured for himself irnmortal fame by his atrocious villany; one, by his unrivalled eloquence; and one, by his ambition, bra- very and good fortune. Julius Cesar may be regarded as the greatest of the Roman commanders. In him the military genius of Rome displayed its utmost strength and perfec- tion ; but, as yet, he was not known in that group of great characters and personages, who, now inflamed with ambition, were preparing to carve and divide the world among them. Lucius Catiline is allowed by all writers to have possessed every quality of a great man, but integrity and virtue ;* instead of which, he held every principle, and practised every vice, which could form a most infamous, atrocious aud abandoned villain. Possessed of a body and mind equally .strong and vigorous, he was bold, en- * There is no more difficulty in conceiving, that a man may be great, without goodness, than that a mountain may be great, with- out beauty. If goodness is essential to greatness, then, neither Romulus nor Themistocles, nor Brenuus, nor Philip, nor Alexan- der, nor Hannibal, nor Marius, nor Mithridates, nor Cesar, nor Mahomet, nor Genghis Khan, nor Bajazet, nor Tamerlane, nor Solyman, nor Charles V. — was a great man. If goodness is essen- tial to greatness, then, to say of any great man, that he is good, must be superfluous. — Ed. ROME. 195 terprising and industrious. He hesitated at no cru- eUy to gratify his revenge ; he abstained from no crime, which could subserve his pleasures; he valued no labor or peril to gratify his ambition. Catiline perceiving himself not among the most favored rivals, who were courting the mistress of the world, determined on getting her into his possession by violence. His end was the same as theirs; but his means were more unwarrantable. He planned and organized one of the deepest, most extensive and daring conspiracies, recorded in history. The lead- ing objects of his conspiracy were, to put out of the way by one general massacre, all who would be likely to oppose his measures ; to pillage the city of Rome j to seize all public treasures, arsenals and stores; to establish a despotic government ; to revolutionize the whole republic; and to accomplish all these measures by an armed force. This sanguinary plot was detected and crushed by Cicero, the great and justly celebrated orator of Rome. The accomplices of Catiline were seized and put to death ; and Catiline himself, who had as- sembled an army of twelve thousand men, was en- countered, defeated and slain. But if Rome escaped this threatening gulf, it was, that she might fall into a snare, apparently less dreadful, but equally strong and conclusive as to her fate. Her days of virtue and glory were past ; hence- forth, she was to be ruled with a rod of iron. The dissentions of Pompey and Crassus were quieted by the mediation of Cesar, who stepped in between them, outwitted them both, and became the head of the first triumvirate. Having amicably agreed to govern in copartnership, Pompey chose Spain ; Cras- sus chose the rich and luxurious province of Asia ; and to Cesar were allotted the powerful and warlike nations of Gaul, as yet unconquered. What was the result? Pompey basked for a moment in the splen- dors of Rome; and his fame was trumpeted by the 196 ROME. eloquence of Cicero. Crassus was slain by the Par- thians, endeavoring to enlarge his territories, and Cesar conquered the Gauls in a thousand balihs. Pompey could not bear an equal, nor Cesar a supe- rior. They were mutually jealous ; they differed ; they prepared for war. The senate and nobility of Rome, and pride and strength of Italy sided with Pompey. Cesar relied wholly on those veteran legions, with whom he had subdued the fierce and martial tribes of Gaul and Germany. No other civil war ever equalled this. It was a melancholy sight to see Rorne given up to tyranny and blood — to see that august and venerable republic forever abandoned to her evil genius. These were not the feeble bickerings of petty controversy. Marius and Sylla, the leaders of the former civil broils, bore little comparison with Cesar at the head of his legions, or with the great Pompey, who could almost raise armies out of the earth by the stamp of his foot. This eventful struggle was at length closed by the battle of Pharsalia, rendered truly famous by the grand object, for which they fought, the greatness of the force employed on either side, and by the trans- cendent reputation of both commanders. The Ro- man empire was the prize ; and both the armies and the generals were the best the world could afford. Pompey was utterly defeated ; and many of his army, won over by the magnanimous clemency and generosity of Cesar, were content to change sides. The conduct of Pompey in this battle, which was to decide his fate, has ever been considered as strange and unaccountable. So far was he from displaying that courage, intrepidity and fortitude and those powers of command, which he was supposed to pos- sess, that, from the very first onset, he appeared like a man frightened out of his senses ; he scarcely at- tempted to rally his men, was among the foremost that fled, and never made another effort to retrieve his cause. From facts so glaring; we are almost in- ROME. 197 duced to believe, that much of Pompey's greatness, as a soldier and commander, consisted in the ele- gant drawings of Cicero, and other partial writers. The true test of bravery, skill and fortitude, is to see them displayed, where they are most necessary — to see them shine in danger, surmount difficulty, and triumph over adversity. Yet no one can doubt that Pompey was a man of great and splendid talents. But who could equal Cesar ? a man supereminent in the whole extensive range of intellectual endow^ments. Nature seemed to scant him in nothing. Among philosophers, math- ematicians, poets and orators, he could shine. He could plan and execute ; he could negotiate or fight ; he could gain and improve an advantage. For seven years in his Gallic wars, his life was a continual series of fatigues and dear bought victories ; and no general, but one as great as Cesar, could have encountered him without apprehension and dismay. The battle of Pharsalia was fought 48 years before Christ, and 705 from the building of the city. Pom- pey fled an unhappy exile into Egypt and was there miserably murdered by the command of Ptolemy. Thus the reins of government fell into the hands of Cesar; and he was left undisputed master of the world. The clemency of Cesar, on this occasion, was as illustrious, as his victories had been. He entered into no measures against many persons, who, under professions of neutrality, had evidently sided with Pompey. He did nothing, which bore any resemblance to the horrid proscriptions of Marius and Sylla. Pie endeavored, in most instances, to forget and forgive. But the reign and triumph of Julius Cesar were short. He soon fell a sacrifice to that spirit of free- dom and independence, which had raised his country to her exalted rank ; for though the demons of dis- cord, ambition and party rage, had now for a long period, aimed all their shafts at good and virtuous 17* 198 ROME. men ; though torrents of the richest blood had flowed incessantly for many years ; yet some men were still left, whose constancy and virtue ever stemmed the strong current of the times. Cato and Cicero were still alive, whose stern virtues and commanding eloquence continued to remind the Romans of their better days. From the battle of Pharsalia to the death of Cesar, was four years. During this period, he went on and prospered. By a rapid series of journeys and ex- peditions, he saw, awed and subjugated all places and all opposition. His arm pervaded, his vigilance detected, his spirit animated, his generosity won, and his power crushed, in all directions. His great and active genius seemed universally to bear down all before him ; but in reality, not all. At length a plot was laid, as it were in his own bosom, which hurled him in a moment from the high summit, whither he had climbed. Brutus and Cassius, at the head of about sixty senators, entered into a conspiracy to take him oflf by assassination. Their object was to arrest the pro- gress of despotic power, to restore the authority of the senate, and the ancient forms of the republic ; an ob- ject laudable in itself, but, alas, how far from being practicable ! Their plot was deeply laid, but seems to have been carried into effect not without a won- derful concurrence of accident, or rather of provi- dence. While Cesar was on his way to the senate- house, where he was to perish, a slave, it is said, who had discovered the conspiracy, pressed forward in the crowd to apprise him of his danger, but could not get to him for the press. Another person* put into his hands a paper, which would have saved him, containing an account of the conspiracy. This he handed to his secretary, without breaking the seal. After he was seated in the senate-house, the conspi- ifUors approached and despatched him with their * Artenidoru3, a Greek Philosopher, ROME. 199 daggers, without resistance, and retired to the capi- lol, where they put themselves in a state of defence. Thus fell the first and doubtless the greatest of the Cesars, in the 56th year of his age, and in the 4th of his sole adnninistration. No Roman ever achieved more arduous enterprizes, than he. He rose to su- preme power, in opposition to men of great abilities and of much greater resources than himself. What- ever standing he acquired, he maintained ; and his enemies could only destroy him by treachery under the mask of friendship. Rome did not owe to Cesar the loss of her liberties; they were lost before he was born. He was allured to seize the dazzhng prize, which to all observers^ had evidently become the sport of fortune, and was liable to be grasped by him, who was boldest and most lucky. Had Pompey prevailed over Cesar, it is highly doubtful, whether Rome woVild have experienced a happier destiny. The fall of Cesar seemed only to accelerate the establishment of imperial government, Octavius, the grand nephew of Cesar, and heir, by^ will, to his fortunes and name, was soon at the head of a new triumvirate, viz. himself, Mark Antony and Lepidus. This new triumvirate, proclaiming themselves the avengers of Cesar, now hastened to make war upon the conspirators, whose army was headed by Brutus and Cassius. Had the Roman people desired their ancient liberty, which they certainly would, had they understood the import of the word, or had they en- tertained any just notions of freedom, they now en- joyed an opportunity of regaining it : but so far from that, the triumvirate were able to excite the popular indignation against the conspirators, and in fact, gained the people over to their cause. The standard of liberty was deserted, and the wretched infatuated people were now employed in rivetting those chains, which were never more to be broken. The conspirators were crushed with little trouble ; and in shedding the blood of the last patriots of 200 ROME. Rome, the sublime Cicero fell a victim to the merci- less rage of Antony, and the base and cruel policy of Octavius. It soon appeared that the triumvirs had combined with no other view, than as a present expedient, which was to be laid aside when occasion should of- fer. Accordingly Lepidus was soon rejected ; and as he was neither a soldier nor a statesman, he had no means of redress. Antony and Octavius presently differed, and once more marshalled the forces of that mighty people under their hostile standards. Their quarrel was decided at the battle of Actium ; a short time after which, Antony expired in Egypt, and left Octavius without a competitor. In the 30th year before Christ, and 724th from the building of Rome, commenced the imperial reign of Octavius, under the titles of Emperor and Augustus. Rome now became an empire in the more strict and proper sense of the word ; and notwithstanding the degeneracy of the Roman people, it continued for several centuries to be the most powerful empire in the ancient world. The commotions and wars, the luxury and wealth, the corruptions and loss of public virtue among the Romans, did not extinguish, but rather called forth and perfected, their genius for literature. The sciences were assiduously cultivated ; and men of learning received the warmest patronage and the amplest encouragement from those great and opulent men, whose wealth was immense, and whose traffic was in states and kingdoms. Indeed, many of those great men were themselves the favorites of the muses. They studied the liberal sciences and elegant arts with a diligence scarcely known in modern times. Scipio Africanus, according to the testimony of Cice- ro, was as eminent for mental improvement, as he was in the art of war. Cato was a man of great learning and wisdom : and those great men who ROME. 201 composed the two triumvirates, especially the first, were highly accomplished in the liberal sciences. When we consider that Cicero was a professional man ; that for a course of years, many of the most important causes in the vast republic were ably managed by him ; that he was a statesman and a great leader in the politics of his times ; that he was, at times, a civil magistrate, a soldier and a governor, and patron of provinces, we may truly be astonished at the extent and success of his studies. His volu- minous writings, which have come down to us, and which form the most perfect standard of classic ex- cellence, leave us in doubt which to set foremost, the strength of his understanding, or the powers of his imagination ; or which we shall admire most, his genius or industry. It is no partial admiration, by which those writings are preserved. The united voice of all enlightened nations has declared their merit and judged them worthy of immortality. The same may be said of the writings of Virgil and Horace and many others. But the approbation of men of taste and learning, in all nations, has set the literary productions of the Augustan age above ali panegyric. They will be read and admired as long as works of genius and taste are held in esti- mation. The Roman empire now appeared in its utmost splendor. Though less virtuous and happy, and probably less powerful, than in former periods, yet the concentrated wealth of the world, the external pomp of so vast a monarchy, threw round her a daz- zling glory, which the most distant nations beheld with admiration and dread. Ambassadors from re- mote kingdoms daily arrived to do homage, to court alliance, or solicit protection. Augustus held the reins of government : there was Eo competitor — no rival. The people, long fatigued with war, were glad to enjoy peace, though under the reign of a despot. There was no Brutus nor 202 ROME. Cassius to conspire or to assassinate. Cato was no more; and Cicero, one of the last luminaries of Rome, had been murdered, and his head and hands cut off and fixed upon the tribunal, where the thun- ders of his eloquence had so often struck terror to the hearts of tyrants. The spirit, which animated the Romans in the days of Fabricius, was gone for- ever. Liberty had taken her flight from the earth, or had retired to the sequestered bower of the sav- age, while gorgeous pride lifted her head to heaven, and trampled on innocence, equity and law. Augustus was an artful, insidious tyrant. While one of the triumvirate, he had been careful to des- troy all the virtuous men, who had escaped the bloody proscriptions, the civil wars, and the violent commo- tions, which were before his time. When his power was confirmed, he endeavoured to fascinate the peo- ple; to lull them into security; to inebriate them with luxury; to dazzle them with his pomp and glo- ry ; and by all possible means to extinguish in them the true Roman spirit, and so to qualify and sweeten slavery itself, as to cause them to drink it down with a pleasing relish. He succeeded : for never was a people more changed in temper, habit, mode of thinking and national character. But detraction itself cannot deny, that Augustus was a general, a statesman, and a very great man. Though void of the magnanimous spirit of Cincinna- tus, Brutus, and Regulus, yet he affected to rever the character of the ancient Romans, and seemed de- sirous that a sem.blance of freedom should still mark the character of his country^men. When he saw himself in the undisturbed possession of empire, the severities of his administration relaxed; and he held the reins of government with lenity^, dignity and wisdom. Few monarchs have enjoyed a longer or more prosperous reign. His genius was less war- like, than that of Julius Cesar ; yet in the course of bis reign, he had various opportunities of showing % ROME. 203 himself capable of commanding armies and of di- recting very extensive military operations. But his greatness was of the tranquil and pacific kind, and he shewed little ambition to enlarge his dominions. The reign of Augustus was active, energetic and long. It was his boast, that he found Rome built of brick ; but that he left it built of marble. In the 30th* year of the reign of Augustus, Jesus Christ, the Son o\ God, was born. The principal na- tions of the known world being reduced under one head, and wars and commotions, revolving through long tracts of time, now terminating in one immense dominion, the troubled elements of human society sunk into a universal calm. Thirst for conquest was satiated with blood ; the ambition of one was grati- fied, while that of millions was left without hope. The spirit of war, wearied with universal and almost perpetual carnage, seemed willing to enjoy a mo- ment's slumber, or was hushed to silence by the ad- vent of the Prince of peace. Jesus Christ was the son of David, the son of Abraham. The house of Jacob seems to have been preserved in order to give birth to this wonderful personage. Abraham was born 1996 years before Christ, and was the ninth in direct descent from Noah, who is commonly reckoned the tenth gene- ration from Adam. Abraham flourished about the * It is in the highest degree probable, that Christ was born four years sooner, than the date generally assigned ; and there- fore, that he was born in the 26th year of Augustus. T.'iis is the general opinion of the learned. It is, therefore, supposed, that in A. D. ], according to the vulgar era, Jesus was really four years old. This mistake with regard to the true time of our Sa- viour"'s incarnation, arose from the circumstance, that the (Chris- tian era was not used in chronology till A. D. 527 or 532. In that year, it was adopted by Dionysius the Little, who appears to have made a mistake of four years in his calculation, which was not discovered, till more than 600 years afterwards, when it would have been extremely difficult, if not impossible, to change the vulgar era for the true one. Besides, the learned are not universally agreed with regard to the year of the incarnationi whether it was 4 or 2 years, before the vulgar era. — Ed. 204 ROME. time of Xerxes or Baloeus, king of Assyria, and about 200 years before ^gialius founded the oldest of the states of Greece. Jacob the grandson of Abraham, removed his family, consisting of about 60 persons, and his ciTects, into Egypt, where his posterity re- mained and increased astonishingly, for more than two centuries. Moses, the Hebrew general and lawgiver, led the Israelites out of Egypt soon after the reign of Sesos- tris, or in the reign of Pharaoh Amenophis, who was drowned in the Red Sea. The Israelites settled in Canaan about the time of the foundation of the first states of Greece, and about the time of the founda- tion of Carthage, as already stated. Eleven centu- ries before the birth of Christ, the form of the He- brew government was changed from a kind of aris- tocratical republic, or, as it is frequently called by theological writers, a theocracy, to an absolute mo- narchy ; and Saul was elevated to the throne. In the year 975 before Christ, the ten tribes re- volted from the house of David, and set up a separate kingdom, which continued 254 years and was then subdued, and carried into captivity, by Shalmanazer, king of Assyria, before Christ 721. The kingdom of Judah was governed by the house of David till the year before Christ 588, making, from the accession of Saul, 507 years; when Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, invaded and conquered Judea, and carried the Jews to Babylon ; where they remained 70 years. In the first year of the reign of Cyrus, king of Per- sia, 536 years before Christ, the Jews, by a royal edict from the Persian monarch, were liberated and sent home to their own land. They were under a nominal subjection to Persia, till that kingdom was overturned by Alexander. They then fell to the Syrian empire, and suffered much from the tyranny and impositions of the dynasty of Antiochus, till the Syrians failed before the power of Rome. They B.OM;E. ^05 were frequently visited by the Greek and Roman generals; but their existence, together with their temple and worship, were prolonged till 70 years after Christ, when Titus Vespasian destroyed Jeru- salem, together with upwards of a million of the Jews. The remnant of them were scattcEed into all nations ; and what is remarkable in their history, they still exist, after 18 centuries, and are distinct from all other nations, persevering in the religion of their ancestors. God had promised to Abraham, that in his seed, all nations should be blessed. This glorious promise be- gan to be verified, when God by his marvellous inter- position, redeemed the house of Israel out of Egypt, and gave them an exhibition of his character, in a code of laws, which comprised a perfect standard of moral rectitudco But it was more amply verified, when the Son of God appeared in the world, and, by his life and doctrines, and death and resurrection, fulfilled the predictions and illuminated the shadows of the Mosaic dispensation, and opened the way for the promulgation of the gospel through the world. That Jesus Christ was a divine person, sent of God to enlighten and redeena the world, seems to rest on two important pillars of evidence, either of which would be sufficient to give it independent support. These are, 1st, credible testimony; and 2d, the superior excellency of that religion, which he taught and practised. The truths of the gospel rest on the fullest testimony, and of that character and kind which mankind have never questioned ; and as to the excellency of the religion of Jesus Christ, let unbelievers deny it if they can, or if they dare. If they dare pretend, that justice, integrity, benevo- lence and virtue, are unlovely, and ought not to be practised by men, or if they can deny, that these, and these only, are what the gospel requires, then they can also deny, that the gospel holds up a per- 18 206 KOME. feet rule of life, and then may they pretend, that it ought not to be practised by men. The testimony, on which the Christian religion chiefly relies, respects and substantiates the following things : 1. The genealogy or true descent of Christ from David ; 2. The life and character of Christ ; 3. His doctrines ; 4. His miracles; 5. His resurrection. To all these things, there is the most full and perfect testimony. The excellency of the Christian religion appears in the following articles : 1 . The character of God ; 2. The character of man ; 3. What God requires of man ; (Thus far the gos- pel fully establishes the law of Moses. But it goes farther.) 4. The method of pardon, through the atonement of Christ ; 5. The constitution and character of Christ's church ; 6. The resurrection of the dead ; 7. The rewards and punishments of a future state. In general, it may be said, that the gospel requires nothing of mankind, but what is for their good ; and it forbids nothing, but what is injurious. A man con- forming to all the requirements of Christianity would be perfect ; he would be without a fault. Whatever, therefore, may have been the origin of the scheme, nothing more, nothing better could be looked for, in one, which was known to be divine. Those, who would wish to pursue these inquiries, and examine duly a subject of such vast importance, are recom- mended to read Paley's " Evidence of Christianity." The reign of Augustus, if we include his twelve years with the triumvirate, was 66 years. No em- peror of Rome displayed greater penetration, or ROME. 207 more extensive and profound policy : and few men could have succeeded so far in undermining and abolishing the power of the senate, and in changing the nature, yet preserving the forms, of the ancient government. The central point of all his movements and aims, was to extinguish the repuhlican spirit, and to render monarchy strong and permanent : and this he did so effectually, that the Romans, ever after, tamely submitted to slavery, and, for the most part, under the fangs of a set of infamous monsters, as no- torious for weakness and folly, as for pride and cruelty. It would be useless, in this compend, to mention particularly the lives and characters of the immedi- ate successors of Augustus. In the most important respects, they are alike ; only that each one, accord- ing to his time and talents, generally improved upon the vices and villanies of his predecessors. Tiberius, the son-in-law and successor of Augustus, reigned 23 years. An elegant historian has said, tiiat he was " a monster of prefidy, ingratitude and cruel- ty." To him succeeded Caius Caligula, who reigned only four years, and " whose life," says the same au- thor, " was a continued scene of debauchery, much worse than that of his predecessor." Caligula was succeeded by Claudius, his uncle, who was little bet- ter than an enfeebled, inconsistent, vicious idiot; at first promising to do well, but speedily falling into every outrage and atrocity. He reigned 14 years. Nero was the first of the emperors, under whose administration the empire was generally dishonored, and the Roman name treated with ignominy and con- tempt. Had it not been for the conduct, pursued by some of his successors, it might have been thought, that nothing could equal his folly and madness, or the astonishing crimes, he perpetrated against humanity, reason and nature. Almost every act of the life of Nero was an outrageous, horrid crime. He murder- ed many of the noblest citizens of Rome ; among 208 ROME. whom, the celebrated Seneca fell a sacrifice, and several other philosophers and writers of great dis- tinction. He murdered his wife and his nDother, and set fire to the city of Rome, and while it was burn- ing, dressing himself in the garb of a player, he re- cited some verses on the de'struction of Troy. Nero proceeded to such lengths, as at last to be- come an object of terror and detestation to mankind. The senate declared him an enemy to his country ; the army revolted ; and people of every description combined to crush a detestable wretch, whorft the tarth could no longer bear. Nero reigned almost 14 years ; and in him the family of Augustus became extinct, 55 years after the death of that emperor. Galba, Otho and Vitellius rose, one after another, and fell in quick succession, all disappearing in the short space of eighteen months. They assumed the imperial purple, only to disgrace the throne, to give innumerable wounds to the empire, and to attach perpetual infamy to their memory. If we except the horrors of the cruel reign of Do- mitian, the younger brother of Titus, Rome was now favored with seven monarchs in succession, whose virtues adorned the throne, and whose energy and wisdom restored and invigorated the empire. Vespasian succeeded Vitellius in the 70th year of the Christian era; and, in a prosperous reign of nine years, restored the Roman name to its ancient splen- dor. He recovered several provinces, repelled all invasions, restored order, harmony and military discipline, and, in fact, extended the bounds of the empire. Titus, his son and successor, was a prince of great virtue. His excellent endowments and ele- gant accomplishments rendered him exceedingly dear to his subjects. In his reign, Jerusalem was destroyed.* This prince, in a short reign of two * Jerusalem was taken and destroyed by Titus, during the reign ©f his father Vespasian, several years before he began to reigQ kimself, — Ep. ROME. 209^, years, displayed a degree of wisdom, moderation and self-command, which perhaps no Roman emperor ever attained to before or since his time. The hap- piness of his people was regarded by him as the greatest glory of his reign. During this reign, hap- pened that eruption of mount Vesuvius, in which Pliny, the celebrated philosopher, was destroyed. Titus was succeeded by Domitian, his younger brother, whose vices and cruelties were surpassed by none of his predecessors. After him, followed five princes in succession, whose names will ever adorn the history of Rome. They were Nerva, Trajan, Adrian, Antoninus Pius and Marcus Aurelius Antoni- nus. These great men swayed the sceptre for about 80 years. They did whatever could be expected from the greatest of men and of princes, in rendering the administration just, energetic, and wise, and in making their subjects happy. But if the Roman peo- ple, even in the times of Augustus, had fallen from their ancient glory and virtue, if they had lost that greatness and independence of mind, which raised the republic to conquest and renown, what now must have been their state, after being prostrated, and de- graded for a century by the worst of governments ! CHAPTER XVII. GENERAL OBSERVATIONS ON THE ROMAN HISTORY, PROM THE ACCESSION OF AUGUSTUS TO THE DEATH OF MAR- CUS AURELIUS. IN our commencement of the Roman history, it was observed, that a formal abridgment would scarce- ly be deemed necessary, on account of its being much better understood, than any other ancient history; and especially, as Dr. Goldsmith's abridgment is spread through this country, and the very thing, in i8* 210 laoMfi. all respects, which the young reader ought to take in hand. We have therefore glanced rapidly over it, wholly omitting to mention the times and revolutions before Romulus, as generally fictitious, touching slightly on the reign of the kings for 245 years^ — over a single city, or a territory not larger than a town- ship, as being scarcely worthy to fill up the lucubra- tions of a folio ; much less to go into a compend, where a few principal events only can be noticed. And, to give the reader a just impression of that part of this history, which is best known and most important, it has been thought, that some general observations, directing the mind to a comprehensive view of a whole period, would answer a better pur- pose, than a dry skeleton of names, begirt only with vices and enormities. The period now before us contains about 210 years, viz. from the accession of Augustus, to that of Commodus. Concerning this period, we shall note a few things : and 1. The Roman empire, during this period, con- tained the middle and southern parts of Europe, the northern parts of Africa, and the western parts of Asia. In the directions and advice of Augustus to his successor, it was warmly recommended, that the empire should not be enlarged. Accordingly, the weak and efifeminate emperors had no inclination nor ability to do it ; and the valiant and warlike gener- ally found business enough in defending what they already had ; while the wise and prudent were sen- sibly impressed with the propriety of the advice of Augustus. The empire was, indeed, of vast extent ; and, if we cast our eyes upon a map, we shall directly see, that it comprehended, as an elegant historian remarks, " the fairest part of the earth, and the most civilized portion of mankind."* * Gibbon.* * Though Gibbon has some excellences besides his " elegance," the young reader must be cautious not to imbibe his stiffness, his jactation, and especially, his obscurity.— Ed. ROME. 2 It During this period, however, very considerable ad- ditions were made to the empire, and 1 believe, more or less, in the three quarters of the globe. In Europe, the Gallic and German provinces were enlarged, the island of Great Britan was subdued, and several large countries on this side and beyond the Danube, as Illyricum, Dacia, Pannonia, &;c. The emperor Trajan, in order to prosecute the war with the Da- cians, erected a stupendous bridge across the Danube; the ruins of which remain to this day, and afford a sublime specimen of ancient architecture. 2. The cruelly, depravity, folly and enormous vices of the emperors generally, form a striking fea- ture in this period. They seem to have been utterly- lost to all sense of justice, honor and duty. Had they followed the examples of Julius or Augustus Cesar, the Romans would scarcely have had reason to regret the establishment of a form of government, which rescued them from deplorable wars and wast- ing revolutions, urged on by the rage of various pow- erful parties, succeeding one another. Indeed it is surprising, that the illustrious examples of those great men should be deserted immediately, and so soon for- gotten ; and it can be accounted for in no other way, than by supposing, that the reins of government fell into the weakest and vilest of hands. When we con- sider the advantages, the first emperors of Rome pos- sessed, it can scarcely be doubted, that many of theni were the lowest, the most detestable and abandoned villains, that ever swayed a sceptre. The kings of the Ottoman Turks, though barbarous and bloody tyrants, were almost without a stain, in comparison with those " harpy-footed furies."* The Henries and Edwards of England, the Louises of France, the Russian, the Gothic and Chinese monarchs, were sages, philosophers, philanthropists and saints, in comparison with them : nor can we read the history * The harpies were fabulous monsters, that polluted and spoiki >vhatever thej touched.— Ed. , 212 ROME. of Rome without wondering, how it was possible for that once powerful and magnanimous people, to be so sunk and depraved, as to endure the tyranny of such monsters, instead of hurling them with indignant scorn, from the throne they so deeply disgraced. 3. If the fate of Poland, in our own times, stands as a beacon, exhibiting to the nations of the earth, a dreadful testimony of the effects of bad government; we may certainly derive a still stronger testimony from this period of the Roman history. The wars of Marius and Sylla, of Cesar and Porppey, and of Au- gustus and Antony, had demonstrated the power of individuals to enslave the state. Those wars had almost exterminated the ancient Romans; had ex- tinguished almost all the great and eminent families, and quite all the great men, who dared to speak and act like Romans. At the same time, an immense multitude of foreigners from all parts of the world, poured into Rome; and the army, which always governed Roaie, was composed of a mercenary rapa- cious crew, as void of public spirit, as of ail sense of justice and honor. An empire, governed by a prince as profligate and abandoned, as weak and ignorant, and who was merely the tool of a mutinous, ill-disci- plined and vicious soldiery, must certainly experi- ence the worst of governments; and must feel their worst effects. Accordingly, the lustre of Rome fad- ed ; her power decayed ; her virtue and happiness were forever lost ; and she was abandoned to every evil and calamity. From various internal causes, the strength of the Roman empire declined greatly, during the two first centuries of the Christian era. She was not only absolutely but comparatively weaker. Many of the Asiatic provinces seemed only to observe a nominal subjection ; and the Parthians, especially in that quarter, gained strength, rose and triumphed,* and set Rome at defiance. The nations of Gaul and Germany grew strong, and often shewed signs of re» ROME. 213' volt, and even indications, that they were one day to trample upon the ashes of their conquerors. 4. The Romans soon gave melancholy proofs of the decay of learning, as well as of civility and po- liteness. We have spoken of the deplorable fate of Cicero. Augustus, under the infamous pretence of appeasing the resentment of Mark Antony, had mur- dered and mangled that great man. The crafty tyrant well knew, how necessary it was for him to silence that eloquence, which must have shaken his throne, and to exterminate that virtue, which must have thrown continual embarrassments in the way of his ambitious schemes. Mfficenas, the great friend of Virgil and Horace, still lived ; but he only lived as a flatterer, to form new modes of adulation, and to act the cringing parasite. In the course of the reign of the twelve Cesars, the Roman horizon, which bad been once illuminat- ed with one immense constellation of poets, orators, philosophers, statesmen, heroes and sages, was left in dreary darkness. And if we descend to the reign of Commodus, we shall see few lights on that once splendid horizon, but such as most resembled the horrid glare of Tartarean fires. " From those flames *' No light, but rather darkness visible "Serv'd only to discover sights of wo !" Yet the names of Seneca, Lucian, Pliny, Josephus, Quintilian, Tacitus, Juvenal, Plutarch, Justin and Galen, were scattered down this tract of time ; long after which Longinus flourished: and Marcus Aure- lius, the emperor, was a great philosopher, and an ornament to the republic of letters. .5. It will be proper in this place to notice to the joung reader, the nature and form of the Roman legion, a military establishment and grand instrument of the Roman power, by which Rome conquered and governed the world. It had been improving through every period of the republic, and greatly so 214 ROME. by Julius Cesar, as well as by some of his succes- sors. The main strength of the legion consisted in a body of infantry, divided into ten cohorts and fifty- tive companies, which companies were more or less full. Each cohort was commanded by a prefect or tribune, and each company by a centurion. The first cohort, which always claimed the post of honor and carried the eagle, contained 1105 soldiers, the most approved for bravery and fidelity. The re- maining cohorts consisted each of 555 ; and the in- fantry of a legion, in its most improved state, amount- ed to 6,100 men. Their arms, which were uniform, consisted of a helmet with a lofty crest, a breast- plate or coat of mail, greaves on their legs, and oq their left arm a concave buckler, of an oval form, four feet in length and two and a half in breadth. This buckler was formed of light wood, covered with bull's hide, and strengthened with plates of brass. The pilum, a long and heavy spear, was the most effective of the Roman weapons. With this they usually conquered, it was about six feet long, and terminated in a triangular point of steel eighteen inches in length. This dreadful javelin, when * launched from the vigor of a Roman arm,' often pierced helmets, breast-plates and bucklers; nor was there any cavalry, that chose to venture within its reach. When the pilum was thrown, which was commonly within the distance of ten or even six yards, the soldier drew his sword, and closed with the enemy. The sword was a two edged, short, well tempered blade, fitted to strike or push ; the latter of which the Romans were instructed to prefer. The legion, in battle array, stood eight deep, pre- serving the distance of three feet between both the ranks and files ; so that each one had a sufficient space to move and wield his arms in ; and this loose order gave great celerity to their movements. Jt is remarked, perhaps justly, by Mr. Gibbon, that " tRe ROME. 215 strength of the phalanx was unable to contend with the activity of the legion." But could the phalanx of Alexander have contended with the legion of Julius Cesar, each under the eye and animated by the spirit of those great commanders, a different conclusion perhaps might be drawn. A body of cavalry, consisting of ten troops or squadrons, was an essential appendage of each legion. The first troop of horse was the companion of (he first cohort, and consisted of 132 men. The other nine consisted each of 66 men, and were attached to the remaining nine cohorts. The cavalry of a com- plete legion amounted to 726 men. The ii defensive arms were a helmet, an oblong shield, light boots and a coat of mail. Their effective weapons were a javelin and a long broadsword. Thus the regular infantry and cavalry of a legion amounted to 6,826 men ; besides which, several light armed troops, called auxiliaries, were attached to it, which, together with all the various attendants for baggage, &c. swelled each legion to upwards of 12,000 men. To every legion, was assigned ten en- gines of the larger size, and fifty-five of the smaller, for throwing large stones and heavy darts. The force of these engines was such, as to produce aston- ishing effects on walls and towers, and they are thought by some writers of note to have been little inferior in utility to cannon. The camp of two complete legions usually occu- pied an exact square of nearly 700 yards on each side. This spot was levelled by the pioneers, and the tents were then pitched in the form of regular, broad streets, the prastorium or general's quarters in the centre. The whole square was then surrounded by a rampart 1 2 feet high, compactly formed of wood and earth, and also inclosed by a ditch 12 feet broad and deep. When this camp was to be left, it is in- credible how soon the legions would be in motion. Their tents being struck and packed, each legionary 216 ROME. loaded himself with his arms, kitchen furniture and provisions, sometimes for many days; and, with this weight, which, says Mr, Gibbon, would oppress the dehcacy of a modern soldier, they would march, by a regular step, 20 miles in six hours. The military discipline of the Romans was ex- ceedingly strict. They were accustomed to various athletic exercises; and their armor in running and leaping, was scarcely considered as an incumbrance. Such were some of the military arrangements of the Romans. In order to form some idea of their armed force, it may be observed, that the peace establish- ment of Adrian and his successors consisted of thirty of these formidable legions, which were usually sta- tioned on the banks of large rivers, and along the frontiers of their extensive dominions. The author just cited says, that under the emperors, the legions were more or less permanently stationed, as follows, viz. three legions in Britain ; sixteen on the Rhine and Danube, where it was early discovered, that most force was necessary; eight on the Euphrates ; and in Egypt, Africa, and Spain, a single legion was suffi- cient for each. Besides all these, a powerful armed force was always stationed in Italy, to watch over the safety of the capital, and of the emperor. These were called city cohorts and praetorian guards : and we shall see hereafter, that these troops were princi- pally instrumental in the ruin of the empire. 6. The last thing we shall notice, as making a conspicuous figure in this period of Roman history, is the rapid spread and persecutions of Christianity, The Christian religion was peculiar in its origin. It was equally so as to the means, by which it was propagated in the world. The primitive Christians utterly disclaimed the use of arms, as a means of spreading their principles. They reUed on the na- ture of the truths and maxims they taught, on the purity of their lives — the meek, quiet and blameless conduct of their followers ; but more on the power ROME. 21 1 and providence of God, for their support, prosperity, defence and promulgation. And in this, they were not disappointed ; for at the close of the second century after Christ, Christianity had penetrated al- most every part of the Roman empire. They had churches established in various parts of Asia and Africa ; in Greece, Italy, Spain, Gaul, Germany and Britain. As professed enemies to the gods of Greece and Rome, and as directly opposef3 to the superstition of the countries, in which they lived, they were general- ly without the protection of law, and odious to the reigning authorities. Under several of the emperors already mentioned, their sufferings were very great. They were subjected to every abuse, and were, in vast multitudes, put to death, with the most dreadful tortures. During Nera's bloody reign, they expe- rienced every species of cruelty ; and even under the reputedly wise and virtuous Antonines, as well as Trajan and Adrian, multitudes of them fell a sacri- fice to the merciless fury of persecution. CHAPTER XVIII. BRIEF HISTORICAL VIEW OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE, FROM THE REIGN OF COMMODUS, TO THE EXTXf^CTION OF THE WESTERN EMPIRE, UNDER AUGUSTULUS ; CONTAINING A PERIOD OF TWO HUNDRED AND EIGHTY-THREE YEARS. WE have now passed the fortunate and happy periods of the Roman empire. In the subsequent part of the history of this great people, there is hi tie «lse to contemplate, but the most deadly disorders, the most agonizing struggles, and the deepest and most ostensible decay. But an empire containing a hundred and twenty millions of people, founded in power, wealth and policy, strengthened by every atixili^ry of human greatness, triumphing over all 19 218 ROME. enemies, and elevated almost beyond ihe reach of invasion, could only perish by the gradual progress of internal disorder. The misfortunes of Rome sprung from her own bosom ; and>,it can scarcely be said, that she had enemies, till she had formed and trained them to the arts of war. In the ISOth year of the Christian era, Commodus ascended the throne. No reign was ever more in- auspicious than his; nor is the memory of any prince more deeply covered with infamy. He formed a perfect contrast to the virtues of his illustrious father, Marcus Aurelius. It would be impossible in this compend, to draw a character more black, detestable and depraved, than that of Commodus. A detail of his vices would occupy more pages, than we can allow to the whole period, which is to be the subject of this chapter. We can say little more, than that, during his reign, the administration of government was totally abandoned ; and the numerous props of a falling empire, which had existed a century before this, were now no more. At the seat of government, there was nothing but luxury, riot and murder. In the provinces, extreme disorder, rapacity, misery and revolt prevailed. On the frontiers, the burning of cities and the blood of thousands marked the foot- steps of invasion. In Italy, disaffection, conspiracy, jealousy, terror, detestation, revenge, fury and despair, surrounded the throne — filled the capital — inspired every heart, and painted destruction in every face. In the army, there was licentiousness, outrage, mu- tiny and desertion. The soldiers, in multitudes, for- sook their standards, and in nuraberless.and fierce banditti, infested the highways. The redress of wrongs and the recovery of rights expired with civil • justice; and while the empire felt those strong but vain struggles, which weref occasioned by the reaction of her natural force, her union, power and military reputation vanished, and left her an immense chaos of discordant principles. ROME. 219 An illustrious parentage gave high expectations of Commodus ; but his conduct soon banished all hopes. He exhibited cruelties, at which even Nero would have shuddered ; and he was more effeminate than Sardanapalus. It seems a pity, for the honor of humanity, that the name of so infamous a monster should have been preserved. His feeble and licen- tious reign produced calamities to his country, after his vices had destroyed him, and he was no more. He was no sooner taken off by a conspiracy, conduct- ed by his favorite mistress, than the choice of the army and senate clothed with the imperial purple, Helvetius Pertinax. He was above 60 years of age ; had served under the illustrious Antonines; and was always noted equally for bravery and wisdom. He had risen from a private soldier, through all the grades of military honor to that of pretorian prefect. With modesty and reluctance, he assumed the diadem, which he was destined to wear, and to grace, only long enough to demonstrate his merit, and to enrol his name among the most excellent of the Roman emperors. If the degenerate Romans discovered their mis- take, in elevating to the throne, a man whose admin- istration was utterly repugnant to their wishes, he much sooner discovered his, in thinking it possible to renovate the empire, now going rapidly into an irre- coverable decline. The Roman armies, which under the Scipios, had subdued Africa and Asia, which un- der Cesar had extended the empire beyond the Danube, and which under Trajan, had conquered be- yond the Euphrates, were now the scorn and ridicule of the barbarians. Through a total want of disci- pline, all subordination was lost — all military spirit} nothing remained but discord, sedition and outrage. Pertinax commenced an administration, vigorous, sys- tematic and comprehensive. The empire, through- out her wide regions, felt his power, and saw and i-evered the equity, which marked all his movement&v 220 ROME. It was soon perceived, that Pertinax would aim to suppress thos^ irregularities, and restore the disci- pline of the arnfiy to its ancient severity ; that he would revive the institutions of civil justice; and re^ trieve the fallen dignity of the Roman nanne. But alas ! his noble intentions and excellent schemes could not be eflectuated by mortal prowess ; the na- tion was too far gone — too deeply sunk in vice and luxury. The palace, the court, and the capital were filled and surrounded with a swarm of execrable vil- lains, whom the vices of Commodus had rendered necessary, whom his weakness had emboldened, and the corruption of the times had furnished in abun- dance. His first care was to displace these, to exalt men to power who were worthy to rule, and to re- strain and punish the insolence of the pretorian guards. He had just entered on UjIs snlutiry but arduous work, when he was informed, one day, that a mutiny was raisir>g in the army. He had only time to walk to the gate of his palace, when he perceived a large body of soldiers rapidly advancing with angry clamors and menacing imprecations. As they drew near, he stood his ground, and with a firm dignity demanded their business. Without making any reply, a Scy- thian soldier struck him dead at a blow. His head was severed from his body, and carried on a pole to the camp ; where, immediately after, the empire was offered at public sale to the highest bidder. It was bid off by a sordid wretch, who assumed the purple, tut who in a few days, suffered all the severities of the fate of Pertinax, without any of the pity and re- gret, which will follow the memory of that great man to the latest posterity. It is matter of regret, that so little is known of Pertinax, that so few circumstances have escaped oblivion, which would more clearly elucidate his pri- vate character ; and especially, that so short a time was allowed him of displaying the energy of com- mand, the wisdom of legislation and the greatness of ROME. 22f man. Historians, however, unite in allowing him to rank with the most worthy men, who ever governed Rome. His energy was guided by justice ; his au- thority was tempered with sweetness ; and all his supereminent qualities combined to form a character truly great and amiable. Were it safe, however, at this distance of time, one might conjecture, that he was too severe and hasty in his first essays at reformation. Had he, by some politic and impenetrable movement, contrived, to separate, and remove to a distance, his licentious soldiery, till he could have levied and disciplined an army to his mind, perhaps he might have enjoyed a longer and more fortunate reign. But what power can renovate a nation totally effeminate and corrupt ! Pertinax, by his abilities and address, ascended from the lowest to the highest rank among men. His re- verses were so numerous, great and sudden, that his- torians have given him the peculiar appellation of the tennis ball of fortune. From the death of Pertinax till that of Augustulus, the last of the Roman emperors of the West, was 282 years, during which time, no less than fiftyri'ix emperors swayed the sceptre in succession. Their names may be seen in the tables subjoined : and for an account of their vices, (for little more is record- ed of them,) the reader must be referred to the his- tory of the decline of the Roman empire : on which part of history, Gibbon is the ablest and most elegant writer in our language. The artful and insidious endeavors of that writer to subvert Christianity, and to substitute, no one knows what, in its place, are obvious to every reader. Yet his merit as a writer, cannot be questioned ; and although his opposition to Christianity, betrayed him into many gross absurdities suited to the complexion of his prejudices, yet his history of the decline and fall of the Roman empire, is one of the noblest of his- torical productions. 19* 222 ROME. So much has been already said concerning the de- cline of the Roman empire, that the young reader may be surprised, when he understands, that it stood upwards of two centuries after this period. But that empire could only die a lingering death. West of it, lay the Atlantic ocean; south, lay Africa, which, since the fall of Carthage, was without power; east, lay Asia, dissolved in luxury, always ready to be con- quered, as soon as attacked, and enslaved as soon as invaded ; and so far from subduing Rome, that they were even too effeminate to maintain a form of gov- ernment over themselves. The barbarous nations, which lay north of the em- pire, were indeed numerous and warlike ; but they could not subdue the Romans, till they had learned of them the art of war. And the power of Rome, under the emperors, lay chiefly in the nothern pro- vinces, where it was most needed. As we have al- ready said, sixteen or twenty legions generally lay bordering upon the Rhine and Danube. The barba- rians, in these times, were generally poorly clothed and fed, and had few arms, as well as little knowledge of the art of war. Their invasions were like those of a hungry lion, whom fierce appetite impels to rush on the point of the spear, in order to seize his prey ; „and their chief difficulty was want of union. Their tribes were composed of warlike, fierce, impetuous spirits ; but they were unsettled, barbarous, roving, independent, and jealous of the power of their chiefs, as well as tenacious of the honor of their tribes. Yet the nations composing the Northern Hive,^ could not but experience a gradual improvement. * The northern parts of Europe and Asia are sometimes called the Northern Hive, from the vast swarms of barbarians, who, from time to time, have issued from those regions to desolate the world. Some have supposed these regions to have been anciently crowded with inhabitants. But the opinion of Robertson is much more rational, that those regions were anciently less populous than at present ; though at present, they are less populous, than otfier parts of the continent. — Ed. Their proximity to a great and enlightened people, with whom they were at perpetual war, their strength of body, their intellectual vigor, and ambition to ac- quire those arts which had so long rendered the Ro- mans invincible, must, in time, have produced their natural and unavoidable effects. In the barbarian armies and countries, there must have been a multi- tude of Romans. Numbers, having fled from justice, or induced to rove, from disgust at their own capri- cious and tyrannical government, would naturally seek an asylum in the wilds of Europe, and among a more free and equitable people. Numbers being detained there would, at length, yield to necessity, and voluntarily remain in a land, whither they had been dragged as captives, assimilating by degrees to its customs and habits. The Gauls and Germans, from the period now be- fore us, composed the strength of the Roman armies ; and great numbers of these nations, whom we shall indiscriminately call the Goths, and Vandals, and Huns, were now admitted into the Roman service, either as legionaries or auxiliaries. Some of them were promoted to the highest stations, both civil and military, and even wore the imperial diadem and purple. Many of these, either never had, or else lost, all attachment to Rome ; and, rejoining their countrymen, carried and diffused among them the arts of war, and advantages of disciplined valor. From the reign of Commodus to the extinction of the western empire, history presents one uniform scene of disorder, vice and misery. We have almost constantly before our eyes, a great empire going ra- pidly to destruction under the influence of bad gov* ernment. A very few of the emperors, however, during this dreary period, were both able statesmen and commanders. Had it been their fortune to have reigned in happier times, and over a more virtuous people, their administrations would have done more important service to mankind. But their best mrf- t?24 ROME. sures and greatest exertions, seemed only to have the effect of medicines given to the sick man, after his disease has become incurable. They might a little procrastinate, but could not prevent, the moment of dissolution. About the year of Christ 267, the emperor Vale- rian was taken prisoner by the Persians, when no less than nineteen persons in various parts of the empire assumed the imperial purple, with the titles of Cesar, and Augustus; and each of them endea- voured to support his claims and titles by the sword. There can be no stronger proof than this of the extreme wretchedness of those times. All was tu- mult, war, distrust, cruelty and the most sudden and bloody revolutions. But there are two circumstances in the period of history now before us, which merit the particular at- tention of the reader, viz. the establishment of the Christian religion throughout the empire, by means of the conversion of the emperor Constantino, sur- named the Great; and his removal of the seat of government from Rome to the ancient city Byzan- tium, which he rebuilt, and called Constantinople, or the City of Constaniine^ We have already noticed the rapid spread of the Christian religion. In the days of Constantine, it had penetrated almost every part of the empire. No sooner, therefore, did that prince declare in favor of it, than it became the religion of the court, the capital, and soon of the empire itself. This was truly an amazing change; and forms one of the most memorable eras in ecclesiastical history. A meek and humble religion unknown to the world, or if known, despised and persecuted, set on foot by a few- obscure persons in Judea, and propagated only by the force of rational conviction, spread and prevailed against all opposition ; overturned the altars and silenced the oracles of the heathen ; and at last, through hosts of prejudices fortified by antiquity;. ROME. , 225 Snd sanctioned by universal custom, made its way to the throne of the Cesars. It was like a " stone cut out of a mountain without hands, becoming a great mountain and filling the whole earth." There are various accounts given, and various opinions formed, concerning the conversion of Con- stantine. Whether his mind was swayed by the power of truth, or by temporal, political and inter- ested motives, is not easy to determine. It is related and believed by some, that his conversion was mi- raculous. They say that he saw in the heavens the sign of the cross, with this inscription in radiant letters, Touto Nika^ i. e. By this conquer^ and that upon this, he immediately embraced Christianity. His life and conduct were by no means eminent for Christian virtue ; nor was he wholly free from crimes of the deepest die. From this period, the Christian church was loaded •with honor, wealth and power ; nor did her virtue ever sustain a severer trial. The chief dignitaries of the empire could scarcely do less, than imitate their master ; and Christianity soon became a necessary qualification for public office. The church now no longer appeared in her ancient simplicity and purity ; lords and princes were among her converts ; and she was dressed in robes of state. Her ceremonies were increased ; her forms of worship were loaded with pomp and splendor ; her doctrines were inter- mingled with the senseless jargon of a philosophy, equally absurd and vain ; and the way seemed pre- pared, not only for the decay of Christian doctrine and morality, but of every science, which distin- guishes civilized from savage nations. After various Avars and competitions, Constantine, in the year of Christ 320, became sole master of the Roman empire. He certainly did whatever could be done, by an accomplished general and statesman, toward restoring the empire to its ancient glory. But, alas! he did not reign over the ancient Romans. 226 ROME. His people had been often defeated, hunnbled, enslav- ed, and trampled in the dust. The true Roman spirit was long since utterly extinguished ; and, as we have had occasion to observe, Italy itself was filled with a mighty heterogeneous mass of popula- tion, of no fixed character. His strong genius, for a moment, sustained, but could not ultimately save, the falling fabric. The ambition of Constantine gave a more fatal blow to the Roman empire, than even the vices of Commodus. To secure to himself a glory equal with that of Romulus, he formed the resolution of changing the seat of empire. The place, upon which he pitched as a new capital, and which should immortalize his name, was indeed well chosen. The ancient city of Byzantium enjoyed the finest port in the world, on the strait of the Thracian Bosphorus, which communicates with those inland seas, whose shores are formed by the most opulent and delight- ful countries of Europe and Asia. Thither Constan- tine caused the wealth of the empire to be conveyed ; and directly a new and splendid city arose, which was able to rival ancient Rome. That proud capi- tal, so long the mistress of empire, suddenly became but a satellite, and was forsaken of honor, wealth and glory ; since the emperor, and all who were de- voted to his interest, used every possible means to exalt the new seat of empire. This wound was deadly and incurable. It proved fatal not only to one city, but to the western empire. Rome was utterly abandoned by Constantine ; nor was it much alleviated under his successors, among whom a permanent division of the empire taking place, Rome and Italy fell under the government of a series of weak, miserable, short-lived tj^rants, who rose by conspiracy, and fell by murder, in rapid succession; till, in the 476th year of the Christian era, Augustulus. the last of (he Roman emperors, was conquered and dethroned by Odoacer, king of the tiEW OF THE COURSE OF EMPIRE. 227 Heriili, who, at the head of an immense army of bar- barians, overrun all Italy, and put a period to the western empire. Thus ended Rome, after having stood 1229 years. When we consider the length of her duration, her cha- racter, and the nature and extent of her resources, we shall not hesitate to pronounce her the most powerful and important city, which ever existed, and as standing at the head of the first rank of cities. But if this remark is true of Rome in the times of which we are now speaking, it will serve to awaken our admiration, when we consider that Rome surviv- ed even this shock ; and, as though she was destined to bear rule, from beini]^ the head of a most powerful empire, she soon became the head of an ecclesiasti- cal institution not less powerful. She spread her wing over all the povvers of Europe. Tiiey trem- bled at her mandates. She deposed monarchs at her pleasure, trampled on crowns and sceptres, and, for ten centuries, exerted the most despotic sove- reignty. She is even to this day one of the finest cities in tlxe world. CHAPTER XIX. IpRIEF HISTORICAL VIEW OF THE COURSE OF EMPIRE, FROM THE FALL OF ROME TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE EMPIRE OF CHARLEMAGNE, CONTAINING A PERIOD OF THREE HUNDRED AND TWENTY-FOUR YEARS. FROM the fall of the Roman empire, a period of darkness ensued, equally dreadful for its length, and for the number and greatness of its calamities upon mankind. To trace the history of those times, is like making a progress through chaos, amidst upper, nether, and surrounding darkness. We will first no- tice the fortunes of Constantinople, commonly called 22S : - :r r^r fli€ ?:: ■: :^^ Greek T^ : f - : ■^^: : • f -• :- f ■ : . :ai- pcr ;. were £ .:. The r . in these Z ■ :f. g^ene- : LT^d io- 1. The :: 3t w._-.^-^i Sat tki^ citT Wii almost - ed : , ".e - : : : : f . : — for i - . :i: ■ ■ : -' -- r-lte ; . " : - , 1-1- : -et 10 so If we except Constz: iroM tbe fall of Rone : BagBe,reae»bMatrc. did cities, tbe soit pop . deiiglitfU rmoos c^ti^ orerwhelTifwilh m:: rail J fint tarn o«r ejef inhabiCaiits-vae the s^ ^ liistoraiis of tinse tiB^ : ceededaD cose^tioB; can describe the kubantj of their aTageconqaer:^ coQTefted intoplmder character vere pm tc slaTerj : their womnBB s Tiolecce. izi 'i^.'.: -::. zh We rie^ :: tt . : tv : : Tr- ie of la: 230 VIEW OF THE gloom, or to cast a partial beam of light through the intellectual chaos : so far from it, that those days were spent in destroying the noblest works of art and genius. A diligent search was made for the most valuable productions of antiquity, not to preserve and treasure up, but to demolish, to burn, and to destroy. Nor did barbarians alone pursue the work of destruc- tion. The superstitions of the apostate Christian church, in too many instances, lent their aid to that infernal work. In this cursory survey, it would be impossible to notice the slight shades of difference in the situation of the numerous provinces of the Roman empire. And as these times produced no historians, it would be arrogance to attempt to tell the reader what was going on, generally speaking, in the eastern parts of the world. We could say little more, than that the empire of China stood firm in its strength, having al- ready flourished for many ages. India and Persia have been subject to changes, divisions and revolu- tions from time immemorial, especially the former ; and the Greek writers are, perhaps, the only histo- rians, who ever wrote correctly the Persian history. It was but partially known before, and has been far less so, since the Augustan age. The North of Eu- rope was only known by the incredible swarms of barbarians, which issued from it, and overwhelmed the civilized world. Of the history of Arabia we shall soon have occasion to speak ; and concerning the immense interior of Asia, commonly called Tar- tary, the best of modern geographers are yet almost wholly ignorant, as also of the middle regions of Africa. The island of Great Britain has been known in history, since the time of its conquest by Julius Cesar. The Britons made a formidable resistance to his arms, and were never but partially conquered. When the Roman empire fell, that island shared in the gen- eral calamities. The British called over to their aid COURSE OF EMPIRE. 231 the Saxons, a nation from Germany, to assist them against the fury of the Picts, and Scots, by whom they were invaded. The Saxons, led by Hengist and Horsa, two powerful chieftains, readily obeyed the call, and, according to the fashion of the a^e, came over in such numbers, as not only to repel the Picts and Scots, but to conquer and enslave the Britons themselves. They therefore settled in the south parts of the island ; and at length erected themselves into seven petty but independent kingdoms, common- ly called the Saxon Heptarchy. These were at length united into one government by Egbert, who, about the year 800, reigned over them all, and found- ed the English monarchy. This brings the English history to the close of the period, which was to be the subject of the present chapter. Arabia forms the southwest corner of Asia. It is a tract of country considerably more than a thousand miles square, and is peninsulated by the Persian Gulf on the east, and the Red Sea on the west. This great country is supposed to have been peopled origi- nally by the family of Ishmael, the son of Abraham. Of Ishmael it was foretold, that he should be an archer, and that his hand should be against every man, and every man's hand against him. This pre- diction seems to have been fully accomplished in bis posterity. The Arabs have ever been excellent horsemen and archers, formidable with the bow and lance; and they have been wild men, and have dwelt in the desert. A singular circumstance in their his- tory, is, that they have never been conquered or sub- jugated by any nation, although it has been attempt- ed successively by the Chaldeans, the Persians, the Romans and, in late ages, by the Turks. In the beginning of the seventh century, a fire broke out in Arabia, which for a while, threatened to involve in its flames all Europe and Asia. It is re- marked by an able historian, as a wonderful synchro- nism, that the very same year, in which the Roman 232 VIEW OF THE pontiff was proclaimed universal bishop, Mahomet,- the grand impostor, forged the Alcoran in a cave at Mecca. The usurpations of the Romish church were then complete ; the beast was at his full growth, and was then ready to begin his reign. It would thence »eem probable, that the beast and the false prophet began, and will end, their career nearly together. It is matter of doubt, whether the great exploitS^ and astonishing elevation of some men, are to be set down to the account of their extraordinary natural endowments, or to a favorable coincidence of events in the world around them, Mahomet, from an ob- scure parentage, birth and education, rose to a height, and with a rapidity, almost without a parallel. From the occupation of a tradesman, he retired to a cave in Mecca, where he pretended, he had frequent inter- views with an angel, by whose assistance and direc- tion, he wrote the Koran on the plate bones of camels. He at length issued from the cave, and began to pub^ lish his mission to the people of Mecca. A storm was soon raised against him there, and he fled from Mecca to Medina, this flight the Mahometans call the Hegeira, and regard it as their grand epoch, as we do the birth of Christ. The followers of Mahomet soon became numerous. He subdued, or rather revolutionized, his native country, and, in a short time, all the neighboring countries. His religion spread with his arms, and was embraced, wherever he conquered. The Saracens, as Mahomet's followers were called, after his death still pursued their conquests; and, in a very short time, all the West of Asia, the North of Africa, and the South of Europe were overrun by this dreadful inundation-, which, if possible, was more bloody and exterminating, than that of the Goths and Vandals. A final stop, however, was put to the pro- gress of the Saracens in Europe by Charles Martel, who defeated them with great slaughter between Tours and Poitiers, killing, it is said, 370,000 in one day. This battle was fought in the year 734» COURSE OP EMPIRE. SSCS Mahomet declared himself to be the prophet of God, sent into the world to enlighten and reform mankind; and that he was clothed with greater light and powers, than either Moses or Christ. His doc- trines and morality were drawn from such sources, as would best suit the prejudices, and obtain currency among the nations whom he conquered. They were extracted from the Jewish and Christian scriptures, from oriental traditions, from legendary trash of the rabbies, and indeed, from the inventive genius of Ma- homet himself, whose knowledge of mankind enabled him to foresee how they might easiest be led and governed. He taught the unity of God, and the uni- versality of his providence, or rather, in the strictest sense, the doctrines of the Fatalist. His scheme of morality allowed the full indulgence of the passions, being exactly suited to the most de- praved mind ; and he so managed the affairs of a fu- ture state, that they could have no influence in favor of virtue, or in opposition to vice. It was not without reason, that he relied on the natural disposition of men for the ultimate success of his doctrines ; but his main arguments, for their propagation, were fire and sword. The kingdoms of Europe in general, as to their ex- tent and boundaries, seem to have been parcelled out by accident, or more properly by nature. Spain is marked out by oceans and mountains ; France, by oceans, mountains, and rivers ; Germany and Italy, in like manner. As early as the period under consid- eration, some remote vestiges may be discovered of the present European establishments. Early in the sixth century, Clovis laid the foundation of the French monarchy ; at which time, the rage of emi- gration by nations had generally subsided ; either because the wilds of Europe had poured forth all their daring spirits, or because a general repletion of the southern provinces had rendered a kind of reflux necessary. No part of Europe had oftener been 20* 234 VIEW OF THE traversed and ransacked, than France ; but as they found less plunder there, they generally pushed for- ward to other countries. The Franks at length nriade a settlement there, after having driven out and de- stroyed several Gothic nations, who had previously dispossessed the Romans and ancient Gauls. From the Franks, the country is supposed to have obtained the name of France. The Franks, after maintaining long and bloody wars with subsequent invaders for several ages, at length found themselves united by a more regular form of government under Clovis, who is reckoned the founder of the first dynasty of French monarchs. During the period now before us, the face of Eu- rope was changed, as we have already stated, by the Gothic and Saracen eruptions. The first care of these barbarous invaders was to destroy and forever to obliterate the inhabitants, the institutions, the manners and customs of the countries, which they subdued. A far more difficult task than this, was to maintain their acquisitions against subsequent inva- ders ; for the North of Europe, like an immense storehouse of nations, poured forth innumerable hordes, in rapid succession. These were equally hostile to each other, and knew nothing but to make war — to kill and ravage, wherever they came. Whether it was owing, however, to the softening in- fluence of mild climates, combined with the scat- tered rays of science, humanity and order, which had escaped the overwhelming flood of darkness ; or whether to the imperceptible influence of various unknown causes upon individuals, the people in the South and West of Europe, instead of sinking into a savage state, began, in the sixth century, to assume a regular form of government, which, though bad in itself, yet, under the influence of a natural course of causes, ultimately led on to the present state of Europe. COURSE OF EMPIRE. 235 The northern barbarians entertained a high sense of freedom; and each of them considered himself as entitled to a liberal share of whatever his tribe should conquer. Each great chieftain, therefore, granted out and divided the conquered lands to the high offi- cers next himself, and they subdivided the same among their followers or vassals ; under this express condition, that each man should do military service a certain part of his time to his immediate lord, and that each lord or great vassal of the court should also do military service to the grand chieftain or king. This division of property, which prevailed in every part of Europe, was grounded wholly on military policy: it became, in fact, the only organized system of defence for several centuries, and has obtained the name of the Feudal System, This system of property, government and war, although it must be regarded as a happy change from a direful plunge of the human species into anarchy, and all the degradations of a savage state, yet was radically defective, and certainly conduced to pro- tract the ages of darkness. Still, however, it left room for the slow operation of causes, which would naturally correct, improve, and elevate the human mind, and which would at length originate other causes, far more efficient and rapid in rending the veil of darkness, and once more ushering the nations into the light of science and civility. Those who would see this subject handled with great elegance and perspicuity, may find it in the first volume of Dr. Robertson's History of Charles V. We shall here only observe, that the exorbitant power of the middle order Avas the grand defect of the Feudal System. The great lords held the power of life and death over their own subjects ; and also the right of making war in their own defence. Of course, if with such an ex- tent of prerogative, they confederated, they always outweighed the king. If they were at war with each other, which was often the case, the king had no con- ^36 VIEW OP THE trol over them; because it was impossible for him to raise or command an army without their assistance. On the one hand, therefore, the hands of the monarch were tied 5 and, on the other, the lowest order were little better than abject slaves to their immediate governors. The feudal governments were at no great remove from the very worst of oligarchies. The want of power in the prince, and the force of the nation so divided, rendered them weak against invasion. This weakness was increased by the jealousies and turbu- lence of the great lords, who frequently occasioned civil wars, and at length reduced them to a state of anarchy, from which they could only be recovered and re-united by union, and a strong sense of com- mon danger. In the midst of the fluctuating waves of war, revo- lution and anarchy, the powerful and fortunate genius of Charlemagne erected a new empire in Europe ; which, for a moment bid fair to cut short the reign of darkness, and re-establish those institutions, which improve and adorn society. His dominion compre- hended the fairest parts of Europe, France, Germany and Italy. This event took place in the beginning of the ninth century. But as nothing can be more uninteresting, than the sterile histories of the wars and revolutions of the dark ages, so, even what is known of the battles, the sieges, the victories, the conquests, the elevation and the grandeur of Charlemagne, will be little more im- proving to the reader of history, than to tell him, that Charlemagne was a soldier of fortune ; that he fought bravely, and was generally victorious ; in a word, that he established a huge empire, consisting of a heterogeneous mass of crude materials — incon- gruous, disjointed members, and which he governed for several years, not by any regular plan of civil policy, which the nations were then as incapable of receiving, as of organizing, but by a strong mili- COURSE OP EMPIRE. 237 iary arm, which he wielded with dexterity and suc- cess ; and that, when he expired, his empire fell into pieces. Injustice, however, to this great monarch, it must be noticed, that he was far from resembling the fierce, cruel and barbarous chieftains of the Goths or Saracens. Instead of deserving the title of Attila, the scorge of God, and the terror of men, he is justly celebrated for cultivating the arts of peace ; for en- couraging men of learning and wisdom ; and for promoting various important civil institutions. Perhaps, but for him, Europe* had still remained under the cloud of Gothic ignorance. He merits an honorable rank among those great and pow^erful minds, which evinced the possibility of checking the strong current of the times ; and, could he have lived and reigned for a century, he might have raised Eu- rope from her degraded state. But time, and a long series of events, could only mature those seeds of or- der and virtue, which under his administration began to vegetate, but which, in a manner, disappeared with him, and left the world in still palpable dark- ness. And here, as in the middle watches of the night, we shall close the first volume of this rapid and cur- sory survey, and leave the reader to repose in hope of a fairer morning; though a morning without clouds is hardly to be expected in a world, abounding, as this hitherto has, ?nore with vice than with virtue, and more with darkness than with light. A COMPEND OF HISTORY, FKOM THE EARLIEST TIMES ; COMPREHENDING A GENERAL VIEW OP THE PRESEJTT STdTE OF THE WORLD, WITH BESPECT TO CIVILIZATION, RELIGION, AND GOVERNMENT^ AND ^ BRIEF DISSERTJITIOJV ON THE IMPORTANCE OF HISTORICAL KNOWLEDGE;; /=- BY SAMUEL WHELPLEY, A. M. Principal of the Newark Academy. SIX^H EDITION, WITH CORRECTIONS^ BY REV. JOSEPH EMERSON, Principal of the Female Semiaary at SauguS; TWO VOLUMES IJV OjYE. VOL. II. BOSTOJV: PUBLISHED BY RICHARDSON & LORD. J. H. A. Frost, Primer CoHgress-strsel;. 1^22. V DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS, to wit : Dutrici Clerk^s OJice. BE IT REMEMBERED, that on the twentj-third day of Maj^ A. D. 1820, in the Fortv-fourth Year of the Independence of the United States of America, West, Richardson & Lord, of the said District, have deposited in this Office, the Title of a Book, the right whereof thejr clainn as Proprietors in the words following^ to wit: " A Compend of History, from the earliest times ; comprehend* ihg: a General View of the Present State of the World, witi) re- spect to Civilization, Religion and Government ; and a Brief Dissertation on the Importance of Historical Knowledge. By Samttel Whelpley, A. M. Principal of the Newark Academy, Fourth Edition, with Corrections, By Rer. Joseph Emerson, Principal of the Bj^field Seminary, Two Volumes in one. Vol. II." In conformity to the act of the Congress of the United States, entitled, " An act for the encouragement of learning, by securing the copies of maps, charts, and books, to the authors and propri- etors of such copies, during the times therein mentioned ;" and also to an act entitled, " An act, supplementary to an act, entitled, an act for the encouragement of learning, by securing the copies of maps, charts, and books, to the authors and proprietors of such copies, during the times therein mentioned ; and extending the benefits thereof to the arts of designing, engraving and etching historical and other prints." JOHN W. DAVIS, €lerk of the District of Massachusetts. TO THE READER. IN the preceding volume, we have attempted tosketcE the great line of history, through the ancient nations. A similar attempt with regard to the modern, and on the same scale, however small it may appear, would be im- practicable, without extending the work tar beyond its intended limit. The reader has already been apprised, that a methodical abridgment, even in the former part of the work, was not intended ; much less will it be in the subsequent. As we approach our own times, the subject matter of history becomes so copious, that its very outline would fill volumes ; and its skeleton could not be accurately drawn, but in a work of magnitude. In passing through a field so wide and diversified, we shall be able only to suggest some of the principal topics of historical observation. It will be like gliding lightly and swiftly over the numberless waves of the ocean, and touching only some of their highest tops. Yet our selec- tion of topics has not been without regard to the pleasure and profit of the reader. It is feared, that the rapidity and general nature of the narration, kept up for so long a time, will chill and disgust the mind. But we apprehend less danger from this source, than from a strictly chrono- logical form, which would exhibit a much greater number of facts, but without combination. In our choice of objects to present to the experienced reader, we have had continual reference to the power of association, and have endeavored to present such, as will be most likely to bring to remembrance groups of ideas and circumstances, which were once fresh, but are dow fading in the mind. TABLE OF CONTENTS. VOL. 11. CHAPTER I. Page. BRIEF Historical View of Europe, from the begin- ning of the ninth to that of the sixteenth century, containing a period of 700 years 5 CHAPTER II. —The Crusades. ..... 11 CHAPTER Hi. The Ottoman Turks ... 14 CHAPTER IV. Important Discoveries and Improvements 21 CHAPTER V. Brief Historical View of the Nations of Europe, from the sixteenth century to the present day. . 27 CHAPTER VI. France 42 CHAPTER VII. . The Northern Powers. . . 58 CHAPTER VIII. ~ Great Britain 76 CHAPTER IX. The Ecclesiastical States. . . 89 CHAPTER X. The Present State of Europe 94 CHAPTER XI. ^ Of Asia 115 CHAPTER XII. ^^ Of Africa 141 CHAPTER Xlll. Of Americi 1.^1 Brief Dissertation on the Importance of Historical Knowledge 212 Chronological Tables. . . \ .223 HISTOKICAL COMPEND. CHAPTER I. BRIEF HISTORICAL VIEW OF EUROPE, FROM THE BEGINNING OF THE NINTH TO THAT OF THE SIXTEENTH CEJ^TURY, CONTAINING A PERIOD OF SEVEN HUNDRED YEARS. THE history of Europe, from the 9th to the 16th century, presents the following important particulars, viz. — The decay of the Feudal System ; the crusades ; the revival of commerce, followed by that of the liberal arts and sciences; the organization and estab- lishment of several European powers; the origin, rise and progress of the Turks ; and blended with the whole, a series of bloody and desolating wars, the offspring of depravity and ambition. During the period now before us, we shall, in this and the following chapters, take notice of such lead- ing traits of character and such events only, as con-' cern Europe in general. In a former chapter, we have given such a general sketch of the Feudal System, as was judged sufficient in that place. We shall, however, further remark here, that that system, not only opened a new era on the people of Europe, but gave to the various wheels of society, a momentum, which still influences their motions. The feudal chieftains acquired an ascen- dency, especially in property, which still continues to mark the grades in society : and though the feudal tenures have gradually melted away, and given place to a more civic form, especially in England, yet the afncient grants of lands marked out certain channels, 51 6 EIJROPE. in which property must for a long time continue to flow. The Feudal System may be defined, the granting of lands to certain persons, in consideration of military services. At what time, or in what place, this cus- tom originated, it is not easy to determine. It is the opinion of many, that it was rather the accidental re- sult of the state of society and property, which suc- ceeded the overthrow of the Roman empire by the barbarians. But others, among whom judge Black- stone is the chief, affirm it to have been among the ancient customs of the North of Europe, as early as the times of Julius Cesar. We shall leave this in- quiry to be pursued by such, as have leisure and in- clination. This system gave a direction to the spirit of free- dom, prevalent among the descendants of the con- querors of Rome, with which the ancients were never acquainted. This was fully displayed in the insti- tutions of chivalry and knight errantry. The general object of those institutions, appears to have been, the promotion and defence of integrity, honor, virtue, innocence and merit in general. They often, indeed, awakened too keen a sense of injury, and thirst for revenge, and of course terminated in blood : but they certainly led the way to that refinement of sensibili*- ty, which is the chief ornament of civilization. To those institutions must undoubtedly be ascribed, the merit of raising the female sex to that rank, which they ought to hold as rational beings and members of society; and of securing to them that treatment — that protection and respect, which are due to their softness, their delicacy and their superior sensi- bility. The raising of the female sex to the rank and es- timation they now hold, in the politer nations, must certainly be regarded as one of the most illustrious events recorded in civil history. Though it seems to have arisen out of chivalry and knight errantry, EUROPE, % yet the truth probably is, that its origin may be traced to a deeper cause. The people of the North of Eu- rope had very early broken loose from the inebriat- ing manners, and despotic governments of Asia, and had, of course, never imbibed their maxims, but re- tained a strong sense of the native independence, liberty and equality of men. Those original no- tions, when refined a little by the influence of wealth and learning, enkindled a spirit of gallantry and personal honor. The spirit of chivalry carried men to all lengths in defence of their own honor, or of that of the ladies, whose protection they had avowed. They would run all hazards, dangers and difficulties, encounter all hardships, or face death in every form. Those principles and passions, when ameliorated by the lapse of ages — when restrained by the influ- ence of enlightened morality and salutary laws, form some of the noblest traits in the human character. And it is pleasing to look back into those barbarous times, and see the seeds of order and improvement, even among the Goths and Vandals, which should one day spring up, and far transcend the refinements of Greece and Rome. The conquerors of Rome, we generally and justly style barbarians ; but they were in many essential respects, less barbarous, than the Romans whom they conquered. They had more justice and integrity, and more of every manly virtue. They were far less depraved in their morals; and possessed minds at least capable of improvement. Another custom, which was the genuine growth of the Feudal System, and which obtained an extensive influence through Europe, was the trial by duel — the most unreasonable and extraordinary practice which, perhaps, ever existed among men under the form of justice and legality. The decision of causes by duel, became so credi- ble and so common, that even actions of debt were decided by it, AD possible disputes, which required 8 EUROPE. the intervention of law, were settled in open coui't by single combat. The person who failed was con- sidered as having lost his cause, by an act, that was providential and divine. The evils and calamities of this practice were very great. In those times quarrels and controversies were frequent, and litiga- tions incessant; and the whole world even in limes of peace, was overspread with slaughter, mourning and distress. Those capricious trials were, at every step, liable to take a turn, which strongly marks the licentious freedom of the times ; for even the judge on the bench was liable to be challenged for his sen- tence, or an advocate or witness at the bar, for his advice or testimony. It was no uncommon thing for the judge to be challenged on account of his decision, the advocate, for his counsel, the witness, for his tes- timony, and even the friends of one party or the other, for their countenance on the occasion. But a case far more common than this, was, that very often, previous to the day of trial, the plaintiff or defend- ant, the witnesses or the judge, were assassinated. Those were times of cruelty, of darkness and misery. There is great reason for gratitude to that all power- ful, overruling Providence, which determined, that mankind should see happier days. The revival of commerce was one of the natural consequences, resulting from the spirit of liberty and enterprise prevalent in the Feudal System. The an- cient nations generally regarded every species of traffic, as attaching to itself a certain kind of igno- miny and degradation unworthy of nobility. But that reproach was wholly wiped away in the revival of commerce, and it was thought not unworthy of the patronage and attention of lords and princes. Venice, Genoa, Pisa and several other of the Italian cities, having obtained certain privileges and exemptions from feudal customs, led the way in Eu- ropean commerce. They soon rose to a degree of wealth and independence, which gave them an in- fluence in all the great concerns of Europe. Venice was the first, the most powerful and pcrnnanent re- public, which rose after the fall of the Roman em- pire; and, next to Great Britain, is the most surpris- ing proof, which any age affords, of the power of commerce. When Maximin, the Roman emperor, besieged the ancient city of Aquileia, the inhabitants, perceiving, that the tyrant would carry the city by storm, found means to make their escape in the night, and fled to the marshy grounds, which lie at the head of the Adriatic gulf. Those grounds are said to be accessi- ble only by one causeway or pass. Here those un- fortunate but hardy people settled on a cluster of little islands, and on flats, where the land and water disputed for empire. But the Aquileians stepped in, and wresting the dominion from both, built wharves and dykes and bridges ; and at length with an in- trepid industry, almost unknown to the world, they raised a noble city, which may be regarded among the cities of modern Europe, as the first born from chaos and darkness. Enriched by commerce, and ennobled by a sudden and surprising revival of taste, it soon became equally splendid and powerful. It merited to have given law to Europe, and, for a while, had well nigh done it. But if it did not govern Eu- rope, it certainly did for her a much more honorable and illustrious task. It saved her from the horrid fangs of Turkish power ; and, in so doing, from a second age of darkness — perhaps from irretrievable ruin. The power of the Venitians by sea was such as to be an overmatch for the Turks, till other powers arose in Europe, who could cope with them by land. But the commerce of the Italian states filled all the ports of Europe with the richest commodities, and served to awaken a general spirit of enterprise, which had slumbered for many centuries; or, more proper- ly speaking, had as yet scarcely been awake. The 2J* 10 EUROPE. Italian states, in strictness, were the first commercial people, who ever existed in Europe. The Romans, rightly called the descendants of Mars, were never a commercial people. They carried on, no doubt, some commerce, as they did arts and agriculture. But they, very early, found out a readier way of ac- quiring wealth. Instead of trading with nations, they conquered them, and took the whole of their effects. When they had done conquering, and had nothing to do but enjoy their wealth, they still chose rather to fight than to trade. Of course they fought among themselves. The Gauls and Britons traded some : but their trafiic was of a limited and local nature, and in the light of modern commerce, deserves not to be mentioned. Some of the Grecian states, in- deed, did something in the commercial line, but their character was rather military and scientific. "They combat," said one, "for glory, and not for interest." The empire of Charlemagne, although it survived him but a short time, strengthened and edified the French and German monarchies. Spain, at this time, contained several petty kingdoms ; and some of the Italian republics, in the ninth and tenth centuries ac- quired permanence and a regular form of govern- ment. Little bad yet occurred to break the force or loosen the foundations of the Feudal System. It stood in its strength, and might forever have remain- ed an effectual bar to the improvement and civiliza- tion of Europe, had not wild fanaticism, and extra- vagant superstition at length effected, by the most extraordinary means, what never could have been looked for in a regular course of probable events. An event took place, which shook the minds of men from their established foundations ; tore up from the bottom their deepest prejudices; awakened them frona the slumber of ignorance and the dreams of delu- sion ; and presented before them illustrious motives and models of action. EUROPE. ll CHAPTER II. VIEW OF EUROPE CONTINUED. — THE CRUSADES. AT the end of the tenth century, a rumor prevail" cd through Europe, that the Son of God was about to make his personal advent to this world, in order to establish a universal empire, the seat of which was to be at Jerusalem. It occurred, therefore, that it was a duty, the performance of which would confer illustrious merit, to rescue the holy land from the hands of infidels, in order to be in readiness for that grand event. It was proposed, that the Christians of Europe should march in a body sufficient to crush the Mahometan powers of Asia ; and it was incul- cated and believed, that, under the sacred banners of the cross, they should bear down all opposition, or, if any fell in battle, that their cause would be a cer- tain passport to the regions of bliss. Preaching heralds were suddenly dispersed through Europe on this important mission. Some of them went clad in sackcloth, with their heads and feet bare.* They flew with incredible speed from king- dom to kingdom, promising to each soldier of the cross, at least the eternal blessing of heaven, and threatening such as remained inactive, with the end- less wrath of Deity. Their success was beyond calculation. The most powerful princes enlisted under the banners of the cross. The flame spread, and continued to burn, from the shores of the Baltic to the strait of Gibral- tar; and from the banks of the Danube to the bay of Biscay. All causes were swallowed up in one ; and men of all professions, of all ages, descriptions and nations, coalesced under the honorable title of sol- diers OF CHRIST, and champions of the cross. In all places the martial trumpet was heard, and warlike preparations were seen. Immense swarms of people • Peter the Hermit, and others. fS EUROPE. thronged from all quarters, to places of general ren- dezvous, whence, in still larger bodies, they rolled, like mighty torrents, into Asia. Never were the nations of Europe agitated by so general a passion ; nor did ever a public passion equal this for strength or duration ; for it governed Europe so entirely, that to make, to preserve, or to recover acquisitions in Judea and its neighborhood, was the grand and favorite object for two centuries. The reader may judge of the importance of the enterprise, when he is told, that, after two centuries were elapsed, upwards of two millions of lives lost, and incalculable sums expended, the Christians lost all footing in Judea ; which has ever since remained under the power of the Turks. This was probably among the wildest, most vain and extravagant enterprises ever under- taken by man» We shall only add the sentiment of an elegant historian, that it is matter of lasting re- gret, that the crusades, being the only enterprise in which the powers of Europe ever generally engaged, should remain to all posterity, an unexampled monu- ment of human folly. But however vain and extravagant the crusades were, they were productive of lasting good to man- kind. They changed the character and the manners of Europe. They, in the first place, drew off and in a measure exhausted, those fierce and fiery spirits, which could never be at rest. They gave full scope to the ardor of thousands of knights and chevaliers; so that their flaming and inordinate courage found other employ, than to waste and extinguish itself in the blood of honest and peaceable citizens. The general union of all Europe in one common cause, although a wild religious frenzy was at the bottom of it, prevented many wars, hushed many commotion-, and caused numberless private animosi- ties to be forgotttn ; the inhabitants of different countries became acquainted with each other ; and especially, when they met in the remote regions of EUROPE. 13 Asia, they looked upon each other as brethren en- gaged in one grand cause, where life, honor and glorj were all at stake. The crusades may in fact be regarded, as the commencement of that inter- course among the people of Europe, which has been ever since increasing; and which cannot fail to as- similate and polish their manners. The Venitian fleets were greatly concerned in transporting the armies and the provisions of the crusaders. The latter, therefore, had an opportunity of beholding and admiring the improvement, civility and politeness^ as well as the convenience, the afflu- ence, the power and prosperity, which result from commerce. They were equally astonished and in- flamed with the idea. They transmitted accounts of the glory of Italy back to the countries, whence they came, and inspired their countrymen with a spirit of emulation. Many of their armies passed through Constantino- ple, which, as already stated, was the only great and important city, that escaped the ravages of the north- ern and eastern invaders, and descended, unimpair- ed, through the dark ages. In the year 1204, one of the most memorable in the times of the holy wars, an event took place of considerable consequence to the West of Europe. This was a little after the fifth crusade ; and was productive of some very important consequences, Constantinople had long been the seat of civil wars, conspiracies and revolutions. An army of French and Yenitians now besieged and took it, and placed Baldwin, earl of Flanders, on the throne of the Greek empire. The family of Baldwin held their empty title for nearly 60 years, when it was wrested from them by the Greek emperors of Nice. This will account for the fact, that Flanders and the adjacent countries led the way in the revival of letters. Constantinople, it is probable, contained the most valuable and precious remains of antiq^uitjj 14 EUROPE. which had been there collected by the great Con^ stantine and his successors. The enterpribe of the crusaders spread over Europe whatever information they gained in their travels ; and, as Constantinople was their place of general rendezvous, the light, re- finement and science derived from thence, were, in the course of two centuries, during which the cru- sades lasted, diffused through Europe. In fine, the crusades gave a general concussion to the public mind, whicli forever shook off the tyranny of many barbarous customs j and broke the long and deadly slumbers of ignorance, whose nar- cotic influence on men's minds is always in propor- tion to its nature and extent. By promoting nation- al and social intercourse, they tended powerfully to melt away the prejudices, and assimilate the minds of men. As they had a union of object, they would naturally impress the mind with a sense of the pow- er, practicability, and good policy of combinations and extensive alliances. As they passed through countries far more cultivated, more enterprising and more opulent, than their own, they could not but draw instructive comparisons, and must naturally wish to imitate those, whose wisdom and industry had secured to them prosperity and power. By all these means, the eyes of mankind were opened, and many nations of the earth received, at the same time, important lessons of instruction — the genius of Eu- rope was roused, and stood ready to explore the avenues of knowledge, and to trace the intricate paths, which lead to more extensive fields of light and improvement. CHAPTER III. VIEW OP EUROPE CONTINUED. THE OTTOMAN TURKS. ABOUT the beginning of the 13th century, a new power arose, which first made head in Asia, and TCRltS. 15 at length became the terror of all Europe. We have spoken particularly, in the former part of this com- pend,of the irruptions of the Scythians from the in- terior parts of Asia. A warlike tribe, sprung from this prolific fountain, had for some time infested the countries of western Asia, and at length were estab- lished in Bithynia. Othoman appeared at their head, and laid the foundation of a dynasty of most warlike and powerful princes. He flourished about the year 1 229. In no part of the annals of history, do we find a braver, more politic, or fortunate race of monarchs, than that of Othoman, or Othman. They seldom failed to unite bravery with prudence, or good for- tune with enterprise. In Asia and Africa, their con- quests were co-exler»sive with the empire of Rome; nor would ihty have fallen short in Europe, but for the intervention of unexpected causes. Othoman was succeeded by his son Orchanes ; he, by Amurath I. ; and he, by Bajazet T. Amurath led a great army over the Hellespont, and invaded Eu- rope. After Uiaking various conquests, he fixed the seat of his empire at Adnaoople. Amurath estab- lished the janizaries, perhaps the most powerful and efficient corps, the most perfectly trained to the art of war, and the ablest and most to be relied on in the day of battle, of any ever known. In the history of the Turks, it is remarkable, that, for several cen- turies, the succeeding monarch outdid his predeces- sor. The son generally excelled the father in ener- gy, policy, grandeur of schemes, and felicity of exe- cution. This remark will in a good measure apply, till the reign of Solyman the Magnijicmt^ w^ho raised the Turkish empire to its zenith of glory. It was not so with the emperors of Rome, but often the reverse. Bajazet, the son of Amurath, was a very great gen- eral. He was impetuous as a thunderbolt, yet of cool and thoughtful courage. He possessed the craft and policy of negociation» together with the power* 16 TURKS. of compulsion. The Turkish armies in his time were distinguished for their numbers and dicipline. Ba- jazet generally commanded from three to five hundred thousand men ; but the flower of his army was 50,000 janizaries. With such a force, no power in Europe could have resisted him ; and he had matured every plan for extinguishing the Greek empire in the cap- ture of Constantinople. But Providence had raised up a power, before which this haughty conqueror must fall, in the midst of his pride, prosperity and glory. Tamerlane was, by inheritance, prince of a Tartar clan. Nature 'had endowed him with a mind capa- ble of forriiing and executing the grandest enter- prises. He early showed that superiority in council and in action, which raised him to the high station of cham of the Usbeck Tartars, His capital was Samarcand. He soon, by the wisdom and energy of his administration, drew to his standard innumerable Tartar tribes, and saw himself at the head of the empire of Genghis Khan. Inflamed by the glory of that great conqueror, he invaded and subdued India, extending his empire to the eastern ocean. From the conquest of India, he had just returned, enriched with spoils of immense value, when embassadors ar- rived at his court from the emperor of Constantino- ple, whose capital was now besieged, and from va- rious other Christian princes, already expelled from their dominions. These embassadors implored the aid of Tamerlane against the haughty Turk, who threatened the conquest of all Europe. The mighty Tartar immediately despatched a herald to Bajazet, desiring to know the reasons of his conduct, and offering to mediate between him and the Greek emperor. Bajazet, whom no power could in- timidate, returned a haughty and indignant answer ; upon which Tamerlane marched against him, it is commonly said, at the head of a million of men. All Europe stood paralyzed for a moment at the expect- TURKS. 17 ed shock; and dreading every thing if the Turks should prevail. They canne to a general haltle near Angora, about 200 miles E. S. E. of Constantinople, Perhaps a greater battle has not been fought in modern times. Each army was drawn up in the most consummate manner, according to the tactics of the times. Fihy thousand janizaries, in a solid column, occupied the centre of the Turkish army, at the head of which Bajazet fought on foot. TamcTlane, in the morning, drew up the flower of his immense force, under the command of his ablest officers; and directed them to commence the action, while he looked on as a spectator, and stood ready to send necessary reinforcements from time to time. He had previously announced to Bajazet, that he might expect to meet him in battle, when he should see the green flag displayed. The first shock was tremendous; and the ensuing conflict truly dreadful. The Tartar lords reminded their soldiers of the glory of Genghis Khan and of the conquest of India. •' Long time in even scale, the battle hung." Atiength, however, the wings of the Turkish army began to sjive way, borne down by the almost infinite force of the Tartar cavalry and infantry, who fought with astonishing rage and fury. Tamerlane, per- ceiving the moment of advantage, despatched ten thousand horse and as many foot, to sustain the wast- ing ardor of the battle. The Turkish army were generally defeated, dis- persed, or cut to pieces, except the janizaries, who, animated by the presence and example of their gal- lant manarch, seemed to defy all mortal prowess^ Tiiey stood firm like a rock. vvhic!i, unmoved, sustains the singing billows. This formidable force, compos^ ed of troops of known superiority, and led by the Turkish sultan, who fought with prodigious valor, still held the fortune of the field doubtful ; when Tamerlane was seeii advancing under the green fla.T? 22 18 TURKS. at the head of 50,000 chosen cavalry, the splendid guards of the conqueror of the East. At that moment, the battle was renewed, and the janizaries, now near- ly surrounded, fought with amazing bravery around the person of their king. But they were over- whelmed as with an irresistible torrent; and Baja- zet, contrary to his own determination, was taken alive, with many of his guards. It is related by some historians, that Tamerlane demanded of Bajazet, when brought before him, what he would have done with him, provided fortune had declared in his favor? The captive monarch sternly and haughtily replied, " 1 would have put you into an iron cage, and carried you for a show all over my kingdom." " The same," said Tanterlane, "shall be done to yourself;" and, it was accordingly done without delay. Tamerlane, having rescued the Greek emperor, and freed Europe from immediate danger, by hum- bling the Turkish power, returned into Asia ; and, subdued Syria and Palestine, proceeded to Egypt and Persia, returnifig after a period of eight years to Samarcand, tbiough the middle countries of Asia. He is represented as a prince of great moderation and self-command, and of a mild and amiable temper. He was adored and almost deified by his subjects. His reign was long and prosperous; and his domin- ions are thought to have been nearly as extensive, as those of Russia, comprehending a considerable por- tion of the known world. The emperor of Hlndos- tan claims direct desrent from Tamerlane, whose lineal desccndnnls also led the Tartars in ihe conquest of China. They, of consequence, now possess the thrones of China and India, and govern a third part of the human species. The Tartars interfered no more with the Ottoman Turks, but left them gradually to recover from so deep a wound. Nor were the Christian princes able to avail themselves of this favorable opportunity to TURKS. 19 complete the ruin of so formidable a foe. Solyman I. the son and successor of Bajazet, derived courage and fortitude from his father's misfortune ; and col- lecting the shattered remains of his forces, soon ap- peared at the head of an army, which was able to keep the field. So severe a check of the Turks, however, protracted the capture of Constantinople for nearly a century. Solyman was succeeded by Mahomet 1.; he, by Amurath II.; and he, by Ma- homet the Great. This prince took Constantinople in the year 1453; which was followed by the subju- gation of all Greece. The Turks, under the suc- ceeding reigns, became the most formidable power in Europe, till, in the reign of Solyman the Magnifi- cent, A. D. 152G, after subduing Hungary, and car- rying off 200,000 prisoners, that great prince ad- vanced into Austria, and laid siege to Vienna. But on the approach of Charles V. at the head of a great army, he raised the siege, and retired into his own dominions, doubtless remembering the fate of Baja- zet. This, however, carries us beyond the period, which was to be the subject of the present chap- ter. As the brevity of this compend will not allow us to enter again particularly on the Turkish history ; be- fore we dismiss that article, it will be proper to state a few things, which do not properly belong to this chapter. There was probably never a race of monarchs of equal abilities for war with the Ottoman race, as far as to the reign of Solyman the Magnifi- cent. They were certainly great in the art of gov- erning a turbulent and licentious race of men, as well at home, or in times of peace, as in the field of bat- tle. And, what is matter of the highest admiration, every succeeding reign seemed to eclipse the former; and the deeds of the father were forgotten in the su- perior exploits of the son. Mahomet the Great, who took Constantinople, is universally allowed to have been a most politic and accomplished prince, as well 20 T^tTRKS. as the greatest commander of his time. But the greatest of the Turkish emperors was Sol) man the Magnificent. In him were combined the first quali- ties of the soldier and salesman. He was fierce and furious as Bajazet, and artful and cruel as Mahomet the Great ; besides which, he displayed a grandeur and dignity of mind, which no Turk ever did before or after him. In his reign, the Turkish empire gained its utmost height of power and glory ; and though his successors cannot generally be styled weak princes, yet the empire has ever since experienced a uniform and progressive decline; and, it has been thought, would, one day, fall before the power of Russia. Notwithstanding the great abilities of the Turkish emperors, it must be confessed, that their characters were extremely unlovely, even to a man ; all their good qualities being deeply shaded with cruelty, and stained with blood. They commoly ascended the throne, through the blood of their nearest relations; and we may apply to them the strong metaphor, ap- plied to Simeon and Levi by their father Jacob; Instruments of cruelty are in their habitation. There is no nation more uniform in their character, than the Turks. In mind, they seem morose, melan- choly, mistrustful, and of course, in their manners, cold, distant and repulsive. Nor do they vary from this character, though dwelling, as they have so long, in those mild and pleasant countries, which it might be thought, would naturally tend to render their dis- positions more cheerful, and their manners more gen- tle and engaging. It is a painful reflection, that those very countries, where the ancient Greeks car- ried literature and philosophy to such perfection, are now inhabited by some of the most stupid and ugly of the human race. One would be ready to wish, that so gloomy and dirty a race were expelled from Eu- rope, and that some nation capable of appreciating the advantages of the country, would take posses- sion of it. JDISCOVERIES AND IMPROVEMENTS. 21 The word, Twr/c, it is said, signifies a rimnderer, or banished man* Some writers have conjectured that the Turks are descendants of the Jews, or of the ten tribes of Israel. From whatever source thej sprung, they erected a mighty fabric of power and dominion ; and could the course of empire be represented by a line drawn through states and kingdoms, it would pass through Turkey; since there was certainly a time, when the Turks were the most powerful nation in Europe, and, if we except China, perhaps the most powerful in the world. CHAPTER IV. THE SAME CONTINUED. IMPORTANT DISCOVERIES AND IMPROVEMENTS. AS the crusades effected a general change of char- acter in Etirope, ihey in hct laid the fi>undation for the dawn of that grand epoch, commonly called the Revival of Letters. The crusades had in some mea- sure, loosened the fetters of the Feudal System, and diffused a spirit of enterprise through Europe, when commerce, which had long been limited to Italy, began to move northward, along the shores of the continent; and Ghent and Bruges, and the towns, which afterwards formed the body of the celebrated Hanseatic league, began to grow famous in Europe, Toward the close of the 13th century, the crusades had ceased, and all the Christian acquisitions in Asia had fallen into the hands of the Turks. The wheels of commerce had just begun to move, and number- less enterprises and improvements were vet in a state of embryo, when a discovery was made of the highest importance to the commercial and literary world* The difficulty and danger of voyages at sea, had, frona the earliest ages, operated as a powerful itn- 22^ 22 DISCOVERIES pediment to navigation. It frequeatly happened, that a long continued obscuration of the heavenly bodies, in stormy seasons, was attended with most dreadful consequences to whole fleets, which were driven on shore, without any possible means of foreseeing or avoiding the danger. The invention of the Mariner's Compass, in a great measure, remedied these evils* In the year 1300, the magnetic power to give polarity to iron, was discovered to be of importance in navi- gation ; and a compass was constructed, which, at all limes, would instantly refer the pilot to any point or course, he wished to know. I'his truly great and ■wonderful discovery was made by Goya, at Venice ; and may serve to give mankind a just idea of the supereminence of the Venitians in naval affairs. Columbus, in his adventurous voyage of discovery, first perceived the variation of the compass. This irregularity, though arising from unknown causes, is found, hov/ever, to be reducible to such established laws, as not much to lessen the usefulness of the instniment. Upon li'iis discovery, infiumerable difficulties at- tending navigahon vanished; and the feai less mari- ner traversed the main oceans, under a surer guide, than a transient view of the sun or stars. The dis- covery of the mari tier's compass was attended with vast consequences to mankind. It opened innumera- ble sources of communitation, intelligence, and im- provement ; and was a.^rand epoch to all commer- cial nations. In short, it gave a new face to the old world, aud brought a new world to light. If the fiiariner's compass formed a new and grand era in nav'.^ation, an invention took place in the fol- lowing century. A. D. 1441, of still greater impor- tance in the literary world, and of more extensive in- fluence in the revival of letters, viz. the art of print- ing. Before ibis wonderful invention, books were scarce, and bor^ an exorbitant prire. They couhi only be multiplied ^y the slow and painful operation AND IMPROVEMENTS. 23 of copying one atter another; and poor and laboring people could neither purchase, nor transcribe them. But printing multiplied books beyond calculation, and reduced their price in equal proportion : so that the world is now full of books ; and the printing of the most useful and elegant productions of genius, costs but a little more than the blank paper. By these means, useful iearning began to be generally diffused through Europe. From remote antiquity, a certain mode of block printing has been known and practised among the Chinese; but which bears little resembhnce to that important art discovered in modern Europe, from which benefits of such magni- tude iiave arisen (o mankind. In connexion with the first mode of printing, if we cont^ider t!ie valuable improvement of the Stereotype, in whicli all (ho l< it( r^^ are correctl}' formed on the face of one solid p'iite, and there remain unalterable, we cannot but be filled witii admiration. The inven- tion of printii;g is entith d to an honor second to none, but that of alph;^bctic writing. The prrfeciiorj of the naval system, and the exten- sive multiMlication of books, have given a propor- tional diffusion of light and improvement through many nations. There seem to be but two more grand improvements necessary, in order to place mankind on that footing for progress in reason, philosophy and virtue, which their exaltc-d powers and faculties and immortal natures, demand. These are universal peace, and a universal language. 1. Universal peace. Although this idea is com- monly received by Christians as a matter of faith, and by many others as a groundless theory, yet it seems capable of defence on the principles of reason. It is generally said, that a man wants but to under- stand his own interest, in order to pursue it.* And * It is very far from being- true, that men have g-enerally pur- sued their own best interest, as far as they have understood it.— Ed. 24 DISCOVERIES nothing is more certain, than that the bulk of roan» kind need only to understand their true interest, in order to revolt from the idea of war, with utter ab- horrence. Look over the history of wars, and sec for whose benefit they have been undertaken and car- ried on. Tbey have been generally waged, to grati- fy the passion, and carried on to support the thrones of the most barbarous and detestable tyrants. Read the history of Alexander's wars. For what did his soldiers undergo intolerable hardships and indescrib- able dangers, but solely to gratify his insatiable am- bition ? When such as escaped carnage, had answer- ed his purposes, covered with scars, and disabled by toils, they were cast off, as a worn out shoe or tat- tered garment, and consigned to oblivion. The same may be said of most other great conquerors. It may, indeed, be urged that war furnishes employment for men ; but so does robbery, and almost every other species of crime. And ought such a reflection as this, to lie against Divine Providence ? Can we, for a mo- ment, surmise, that men are thrown into such a condi- tion here on earth, as to have no other means of sub- sistence, than schemes for the destruction of each other? God forbid f This argument, in favor of war, is an insult upon the Creator, who has sair*^ Thou shall not kill. It is also sometimes said, that war is neces- sary to diminish population; and that otherwise the world would not bold or support mankind. Must then mankind become worse than wild beasts, and cruel as devils, in order to disburthen the world of its supernumerary inhabitants, and thin the ranks of society? He who has made man, and given him the earth for his habitation, intonded it for his support, and there can be no doubt, that, could peace become per- maner^t aiid universal, the arts of peace would so flourish, that the earth would support more millions, than it n<>w does thousands : the whole earth would^ at Itingth,, become a garden.^ AND IMPROTEMENTS. 25 Before the globe should acquire more inhabitants, than it could support, Almighty Providence, ever at hand, and all whose course is marked with equal wis- dom and benevolence, would help us to a solution of this difficulty, in a way, of which, in our present be- wildered state, we can form no conception. 2. The plan suggested by Leibnitz and many oth- ers, of a universal language, or as some have styled it, a language of thoughts, would probably result from universal peace. To the hostility of nations may be reasonably imputed, in a great measure, their diver- sity of languages, customs and manners. By these, they are divided as by walls of immeasurable height, and kept strangers to each other. They cherish not only personal animosities, but even an aversion to each other's religion, politics and learning. Could the veil be removed from human reason, and the true light of philosophy shine, men would learn to respect one another, and national prejudices woqid vanish away. Then also the prospects of pleasure and ad- vantage, resulting from a more intimate union be- tween nations, would produce numberless schemes to facilitate a communication, which could only be ren- dered complete and universal, by a universal language. Whether genera and species of things, or in short, "whether univesal terms can be, in any way, express- ed by characters or symbols, and particulars by com- binations or indices, we cannot say. Men's thoughts are about things ; and things are the same to one as to another; therefore men think nearly alike, except when they think about words, and get out of the region of nature into that of art. That there will be a written language, which all na- tions can read and understand, is, in fact, a thing far more probable to us, than it can be to a savage, who never heard of an alphabet, or that there is such a thing as we call reading and writing. But what char- acters, combinations and gestures will compose that language, some future Cadmus must determine. 26 DISCOVERIES AND IMPROVEMENTS. In the midst of the gradually increasing light of science, a (ew men, in various parts of Europe, seem to have been able to tear off, at once, the palpable veil of darkness from men's minds ; and to consume, in a moment, the mighty masses of wood, hay and stubble, which ignorance and superstition had been heaping upon science for a thousand years. The names of Erasmus and Grotius' and Puffendorf merit the highest honor in the illustrious list of the fathers of literature. And, at this period, Christopher Co- lumbus, a native of Genoa, planned and executed the grandest enterprise ever undertaken by man. From his knowledge of the figure of the globe, he conjec- tured there must be a balancing continent, to operate as a counterpoise to the old one. For several years, Columbus petitioned the courts of Europe in vain. At length he was furnished with a small squadron of ships by the court of Spain, and commissioned to go and seek for the new world in the western ocean. Braving the dangers of an un- known sea, and the mutinies of his more boisterous and tempestuous sailors, he performed the adventur- ous voyage, and discovered a continent. The grati- tude of Spain rewarded his services with chains and a dungeon; and mankind, to mend the matter, have called the quarter of the globe, which he discovered, after Americus, a Florentine pilot — about as much entitled to that honor as Bamfield Carew, king of the gypsies, or Tangrolipix the Turkish chieftain. We have now given the reader a brief sketch of the causes, which raised the nations of Europe into a state of improvement and civilization, after the reign of darkness and barbarity for so many ages. It now only remains that we consider their progress, under the more auspicious influence of science, mo- rality and religion. GERMANY. 27 CHAPTER V. BRIEF HISTORICAL VIEW OP THE NATIONS OF EUROPE, FROM THE BEGINNING OF THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY TO THE PRESENT DAY. GERMANY. DURING a considerable part of the 16tb century, Europe was governed by rnonarchs, whose uncom- mon abilities enabled thf m to improve the science of government. Charles V. Henry VIII. Francis I. and Solyman the Magnifjcent, were then actors in the great drama, of which all Europe was the stage; and each succeeding year held up new scenes to the politician, historian and philosopher. The posterity of Charlemagne held the throne of Germany for a hundred years, when they were reject- ed by the princes of the empire, and Conrad, duke of Franconia, was elevated to the imperial dignity. Since that time, the monarchy has been elective. Various families enjoyed the dignity ; and the empire was constantly engaged in wars with France, with the north(>rn powers of Europe, with the pope, or wivh the Turks. By the death of the ernperor Maxi- milian in 1519, the German throne, at that time con- sidered as the first among the royal dignitaries of Eu- rof^e, was become vacant. Two candidates of very different but equally powerful claims, sought the suc- cession ; Fiancis the First, king of France, and Charles, king of Spain and the Low Countries. The proximity of France to Germany, the high military reputation of Francis, the interest he had with several electors, and his capacity for intrigue, induced him to hope for succfss. CharlciJ. wlto by his accession to the imperial throne was denominated the Fii\h, was descended front the house of Austria, and by family alliances was the most powerful prince in modern times. His father 28 GERMANY. was Philip the Handsome, archduke of Austria, and son of the emperor Maximilian. The paternal grand- mother of Charles was the daughter of Charles the Bold, duke of Burgundy; and from her he inherited the sover* ignty of Flanders and all the Low Coun- tries. His mother was Joan, the daughter of Ferdi- nand and Isabella, in whose right he inherited the monarciiy of Spiiin and South America. These powerful rivals endeavored to substantiate their claims, and press their pretensions by various, and indeed, by weighty considerations. The known abilities of Francis, as a soldier and statesman, had already spread his fame, and added terror to the arms of France. The truly vast resources of the young Spanish monarch seemed to point him out, as the proper person to sustain the high and important charge of governing and defending the German em- pire. But the electors, jealous of the French on the one hand, and fearing on the other, the extreme youth of Charles, unanimously determined to make an offer of the imperial crown to Frederic, elector of Saxony, who was surnamed the Wise. The refusal and reply of that magnanimous prmce on so inter- esting an occasion, which we copy from RussePs Modern Europe, is worthy of a place in this brief sketch. " In times of tranquility." said Frederic, " we wish for an emperor, who has no power to invade our liberties. Times of danger demand one, who is able to secure our safety. The Turkish armies, led by a warlike and victorious monarch, are now assembling ; they are ready to pour in upon German) with a violence unknown to former ages. New conjunctures call for new expedients. The imperial sec ptre must be committed to some hard morn poui^rlul than mine, or that of any other Gern..^a prince. We pos- sess neither dnminlons, nor revenue!?, nor authority, which might en - \^ as to en« ounLr such a formi- dable enemy. Recourse must be had, iu this exigen- «ERMANY. 29 cy to one of the rival monarchs, each of them can bring into the field forces sufficient for our defence. But as the king of Spain is of German extraction, as? he is a member and prince of the empire by the territories which descend to him from his grand- father, and as his dominions stretch along that fron* tier, which lies most exposed to the enemy, his claim, in my opinion, is perferable to that of a stranger t<> our language, to our blood, and to our country." " In consequence of this speech," continues th6 same author, '' Charles was elected." As we now have before us by far the most impor* tant period of German history, we shall be a little more particular in giving a sketch of the reign of Charles V. This we shall do, not by exhibiting a detail of events, but by stating a few of the lead- ing objects, which present in the histories of those times. And 1. The first object, which engages the attention under this reign, is the rivalship and contention be- tween Charles and Francis. Of this there is scarce- ly a parallel to be found in history. Their ambition was equal; and the resources and abilities of each were very great, but extremely different. The cen- tral and compart situation of France gave it greatly the advantage in several respects. To this add, that Francis I. was not only an accomplished statesman, but an able commander. His genius, however, both civil and military, was of a peculiar cast : and no two rivals were ever more completely different. He was brave, active, energetic and impetuous; thougK at times his impetuosity betrayed him into rashness. He manifested greater abilities in extricating him- self from difficulties, into which his hasty, generous and credulous temper bad thrown him, than his rival did in gaining advantages over him. Charles was gloomy, plodding, and in dissimulation,* seldom surpassed. I3ut the distance of Spain and Germany, the two vast machines he had to managjB 23 30 GERMANY. and keep in order, and, in short, the distance of both fronri the Low Countries, and of the latter from Aus- tria, consumed his time and denied him the celerity necessary to war and conquest. Indeed when we consider attentively the designs, which Chanes ac- complished in a long and splendid reign, they can hardly be allowed to be answerable to the greatness and vigor of his genius, or resources. In his wars "with Francis, he generally had the advantage ; and the famous battle of Pavia in 1525, in the sixth year of his reign, seemed to crown his good fortune in the entire ruin of his antagonist. On the 24th of Febuary, 1525, the imperial guards encountered Francis at Pavia, near the river Po, in the duchy of Milan. The French army was defeated with great slaughter, and the king himself made prisoner. Charles having his rival and implacable enemy DOW in his power, dictated to him such conditions of peace, as his own haughty and crafty policy suggest- ed. These conditions Francis signed, in order to gain his liberty, but was careful never to fulfil. Though the vast power of the emperor always seemed to give him the upper hand, yet Francis at the time of his death, left his kingdom far better than he found it ; andjii^deed, hrs able and vigorous administration laid the foundation for the elevation of France to that sublime height, to which she has since risen. 2. The second leading object in the reign of Charles V. was the systematic and formidable resis- tance he made to the Turkish power ; and this was by far the most fortunate circumstance of his reign. The Turks had become truly terrible to all Europe. The capture of Constantinople, and the reduction of the Greek empire, although it established their dominion over the finest regions of the globe, swell- ed their treasures with incalculable wealth, and gave them the fullest enjoyment of imperial magnificence GERxMANY. 31 and luxury, neither abated their courage, activity, nor ambition. Their next field of r'ory was the German empire; and Solyman the M- : aificent, now on the throne, seemed every way equa^ to ihe great- est enterprise. Under the reign of this prince, the Turkish power gained its utmost height. Solyman, determining, if possible, to excel his ancestors, bad actually planned the conquest of Germany ; and, as before stated, had reduced Hungary and laid siege to Vienna, the capital of the German empire. The disposition of Charles was too cool and contemplative to delight in a military life. The present call, however, both of self-preser- vation and of glory was indispensable. Charles ap- peared at the head of an army answerable to his own greatness, as well as to that of his adversary. No force so formidable had been brouglit into the field against the Turks, since the defeat of Bajazet by Tamerlane. Each army was doubtless composed of the finest troops in the world, directed by the greatest masters of the art of war, and that under the imme- diate eye of two of the greatest monarchs. These two consummate statesmen, however, saw too clearly the consequences of hazarding a general battle. They already had too much to risque; and, from the event it seems, that neither of them wished to tic^ht, unless pressed by necessity to that dangerous measure. On the approach therefore of the impe- rial army, Solyman prudently retired into his own dominions; nor did he see cause, during the life of Charles, to make a similar attempt upon Germany, The immense fabric of power and policy, which, during Charles' reign, Germany presented to the Turks, in fact, repressed that warlike nation, and their military spirit seemed to expire with Solyman the Magnificent. 3. Charles V. was, at heart, no great friend to re- ligion, in any form, especially when it was likely to interfere with his favorite scheaies. He was much S2 OERBIANV. fonder of an earthly, than of a heavenly kingdom. This consideration presents another important trait in his reign. For notwithstanding the greatness of his power, it is probable the reformation could not have been set on foot in any other reign, with great- er or equal prospects of success. Charles had no idea of adopting any new religion, nor did he want Tery much of the old. He was, therefore, an enemy to Luther aiid the Reformation, of which he was the instrument. But the vast schemes of policy, in which his mind was engaged, left him no room to direct his attention to the suppression of what he considered as a religious heresy. He therefore, for a considerable time, left Luther and his adherents to the censures of the church, which he well knew were not apt to be sparing, especially toward those, wh(^ attacked her corruptions. Luther had dared to erect the standard of rebellion against the sovereign pontiff, whose claims and abuses of spiritual power were equally enormous. This he first did by exposing the wickedness of the sale of indulgences. Long before this period, the pope had claimed the power and right of pardoning sin. At first he granted remission upon confession and signs of repentance ; but these terms being at length thought too cheap, the criminal was compelled to pay a sum of money, in order to obtain absolution. From sins past, the transition, by a little refinement, was not difficult to an anticipation of forgiveness. This, as may readily be supposed, soon became an important and very lucrative traffic to the church. Indulgences to commit sin were actually sold ; and men would so cheerfully pay their money for this article, that it became a principal source of church- revenue. It is said that the sale of indulgences was begun by Urban II. in order to encourage men to en- gage in the crusades. In the times of Luther, it had arisen to a very high pitch J and the various provinces and depart- GERMANY. 3.3 xftents of the church were actually farmed out, and the business reduced to a regular system. From censuring this practice, which for the enor* mity of its wickedness was perhaps never surpassed, Luther proceeded to other corruptions of Popery, and with rapid course, at length to attack the whole fabric of papal power. The popularity of his talents and the force of truth, seemed to aid the purposes of Providence in his exertions. His success was amaz- ing. Among his adherents were many persons of distinction, and some of the most powerful princes of the empire, particularly the Elector of Saxony, and the Landgrave of Hesse. Whilst the pope was endeavoring by the terror of his spiritual thunders, to subdue Luther and his fol- lowers, and render them obedient to his will, the em- peror was deeply engaged in far different schemes 5 intending, however, when he should have leisure, to crush the reformation, at a blow. But Charles never found much leisure from the toils and vexations of ambition ; and before he was ready to second the views of the pope, the reformation had taken too deep root to be easily extirpated. This period of German history brings to light one •of the most extraordinary characters of modern times, Maurice, marquis of Misnia and Thuringia, rendered himself conspicuous by his formidable resistance ta the power of Charles V. the essential service he gave to the Protestant cause, and the dissimulation and duplicity, with which he accomplished his designs. Having first espoused the cause of Luther, he became active in the councils of the Protestant princes; but suddenly changed his course, and entered into the measures of the emperor, for suppressing the Refor- mation. This new coalition, he supported with a high hand, and, after the fall of the Elector of Sax- ony, succeeded to that principality ; at the same time, taking the most active and effectual measures to r«m ^3* 34 GERMANY. the Protestant cause, which now to all appearance became desperate. After having gone such lengths, as to gain the en- tire confidence of the emperor, he again suddenly shifted his course, and by a public manifesto, declared himself the friend of the Reformation, the avenger of the injured princes, whom Charles had stripped of their dominions, and the supporter of the ancient Germanic constitution. At the same time, march- ing with a powerful army toward Austria, he endeav- ored to surprise the emperor, as he lay at Inspruck •with but a small force. Charles made his escape over the Alps, almost unattended. The night was dark and rainy, and the fugitive monarch was obliged to ride in a litter, being at that time afflicted with the gout. We must refer the reader to the histories of Ger- many for a detail of those events, which compelled the emperor to -abandon all his ambitious projects. He found, notwithstanding his great resources, that so far from governing Europe, he could not even gov- ern Germany accoi-ding to his desire. A short time after this, therefore, at the celebrated peace of Passau, Charles fully recognized the claims of the Protes- tants, allowing them the free exercise of their reli- gion according to the confession of Auj^sburgh; and the government of Germany recovered the state in which it was before the aggressions of Charles V. But the most humbling stroke, which he received from Germany, was the refusal of the electoral col- lege to secure to his son Philip the imperial crown ; which being given to his biolher Ferdinand, the eves of that povi^erful and ambitious prince were fully opened, and he saw the object, with which he had long flattered himself, of a mighty and glorious em- pire in his own line, now vanish away, as a vain illu- sion, or an empty dream. An empire, like those of Cyrus, Alexander and Cesar, cannot be founded by the force of civil policy. It must be the offspring GERM ANT. 35 of war and conquest. As a statesman Charles was great : but annong his rivals and enemies, he found uearly his match. Henry Vlfl. Leo X. Francis I. and Solyman the Magnificent, were, at least some of them, not much his inferiors. But Maurice, a man who rose up, as it were under his shadow, was far his superior in whatever relates to an accomplished statesman. The writer of the History of Modern Eu- rope makes no hesitation to assert, that " perhaps no prince, ancient or modern, ever discovered such deep political sagacity at so early a period of life :" nor indeed are there any known reasons for preferring his political to his military talents. Maurice, having effectually humbled Charles, re- stored the Germanic constitution, and confirmed the religious liberties of Germany, seemed to bid fair to become one of the greatest actors in the great drama of modern Europe; but in gaining a victory over Al- bert of Brandenburg, who had for some time infested the neighboring countries with depredations, he lost his life in the thirty-second year of his age. Divine Providence, when it determined to establish the reformation in Germany, saw fit to preserve the life of Luther in the midst of his enemies and sur- rounded with dangers. But it is remarkable, that three of the most illustrious defenders of Protestant- ism, were cut off in the flower of youth, in the com- mencement of their career, and when they seemed able to accomplish the most important and salutary changes; Maurice, of Saxony, Gustavus Adolphus of Sweden, and Henry IV. of France. Charles V. governed the most extensive empire known in history.* It comprehended Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, Italy and territories in America larger than all Europe. Had be been as prone to war, as some men have been, it would seem as though his empire might have been universal. Charles, however, in the fifty-sixth year of his age, astonished •The Russian empire should undoubtedly be excepted.— Ed. 4^6 GERMAN V« Europe, by the resignation of all his extensive domin- ions. Great as they were, he probably renounced th^m in disgust, because he could not make them greater. Indeed the first rivals of his glory were no more. Henry and Francis, his youthful competitors, were gone from the stage of action ; his favorite schemes were defeated, and forever abandoned ; and we may conjecture, that he sickened at the unsub- stantial enjoyment of power and dominion. He re- tired to the monastery of St. Justus in the province of Estramadura in Spain, where he spent two or three of his last years in philosophical speculations, literary pursuits, rural amusements and religious devotions. But no force of resignation, nor form of reasoning could reconcile him to so great a change : and the retrospect whether of scenes of grandeur or of guilt, whether of fallacious hopes or blasted ambition, prov- ed a canker to all his enjoyments, covered him with melancholy, and hastened the decay of his health. He died in the fifty-ninth year of his age, exhibiting a striking proof of the vanity of human ambition. During the reign of Charles V. the German em- pire seemed to be at its utmost point of elevation, and was able to preserve a lofty and menacing attitude toward the neighboring powers ; so that even the greatest of all the Turkish monarchs was willing to retire at the approach of Charles V. rather than to endure a conflict with that powerful prince ; as al- ready noticed. Perhaps no nation, for the space of twenty centu- ries, ever produced more good soldiers, or underwent more hard fighting, than the Germans. And although the imperial dignity of Germany has been regarded, as the first in Europe ; yet the essential defects, inter- woven in the frame and constitution of the Germanic body, have rendered it weak, and liable to decay and dissolution.* Since the reign of Charles V. its im- * In the year 1806. Francis II. resigned the crown of the G§in tnan emp^-e, the ancient Germanic body was dissolved, and severaU SPAIN. 37 portance among the belligerent powers of Europe, has, for the nnost part, experienced a gradual decline. A vacanc}' in the inriperial throne is supplied by an electoral college, consistinng of nine electors, viz. the Archbishop of Mentz, the Archbishop of Triers, the Archbishop of Cologne, the Elector of Bohemia, the Elector of Saxony, the Elector of Brandenburgh, the Elector of Palatine and the Elector of Hanover. But we can say little more of the Germanic body, in this place, than that it consists of about 300 petty princes, who are almost independent in their own do- minions. Many of those princes are proud, poor and oppressive; and their subjects are servile, stupid and submissive. The German empire is a vast unwieldy body, more kept together by the pressure of external causes, than by any internal principle of union. Germany has produced vast numbers of learned and ingenious men. In useful discoveries and inven- tions, their plodding and apparently heavy genius, has perhaps excelled that of every other nation in the world. But it is ardently to be wished, that the Germans had a better government, and more virtue. It is evident, that essential deficiencies in these im- portant respects, have long been undermining their tottering fabric, and have at last brought them to the brink of ruin. SPAIN. OF the history of Spain, very little notice has been taken in any part of this compend. When the Ro- man empire fell in pieces, the Spaniards were left to struggle with their own vices and depravity ; and a hard struggle it was. Neither its history nor geog- German states united denominating" themselves the Confederation of the Rhine. Of this Confederation, Bonaparte was acknowledged the head. In the year 1815, after the overthrow of Bonaparte, a new union was fornsed amonp: the states of Gei-many under the title of the Germanic Confederation. This, however, appears to be very different from the former union. — Ed. 38 SPAIN. raphy is very well known, even to the present d^yl The Gothic and Saracen invasions both essentially affected Spain : but the affairs of Spain were very little connected with those of Europe, in general^ till a little before the reign of Charles V. That powerful monarch, inheriting Spain in the right of his mother, and Germany in that of his grandfather, long meditated the ambitious project of universal em- pire : but Providence had seated on the thrones of the other European powers, princes capable of pene- trating and baffling all his designs. Charles V. after having for many years involved all Europe in w^ar, finding his ambition likely to fail of its ultimate object, abdicated his dominions to his son Philip II. who succeeded him in the government of Spain and the Low Countries. Philip was a gloomy bigot, more fit for a mendicant, than a legislator, or for a monk, than a monarch; but he entered on hia public career, with greater resources, than any other monarch of modern times. To render his reign il- lustrious, therefore, by some grand exploit, he deter- mined on the project of conquering Great Britian ; a project, v;hich has often originated on the continent. To this measure, he was impelled by two rijotives ; first, that he might establish his own power and fame as a conqueror; and, secondly, that, in the name of the holy church, he might take vengeance on an apostate, heretical, and reprobate nation, who, since the time of Henry Vlil. had rebelled against the see of Rome. Philip, having determined on his important enter- prise, made the most active and powerfui exertions. The ports of Europe, from the mouth of the Elbe to the Strait of Gribraltar, resounded with naval pre- parations. At length a fleet was put to sea, pompously styled the Invincible Armada, of size almost sufficient to shade the British Channel. This tirmada carried not only a great army, thought sufficient to carry off England by handfuls, but a multitude of priests, holy SPAIN. S9 fathers, confessors and inquisitors ; together with a court of inquisition conriplete, with all sorts of en- gines and instruments of torture belonging to that hellish tribunal. With these, they intended to enter upon the conversion of such of the English people, as should escape the sword. As the armada approached, they were met by the English fleet, commanded by Admiral Lord Howard and Sir Francis Drake ; and the Spanish ships to the amount of nearly one hundred sail, were burnt, sunk, or taken. The remnant were mostly dispersed and lost in a tempest; a few of them in attempting to make their escape round the north of Scotland, were picked up, one by one, or wrecked on the shoals of the Orkney or Hebride islands. Excepting this celebrated expedition, Philip II. did little during his inglorious reign, but murder and tor- ment the Protestants in the Low Countries. Those provinces at length revolted from him, erected the standard of liberty, and, after a long and bloody war, gained their freedom and independence; which they maintained with dignity and honor. For nearly a century, they disputed the empire of the sea with BHitain. But they no longer exist as a free people- They are forever swallowed up in the vortex of th€ French re#olution. Whatever shadow of liberty existed in Spain, was obliterated by Charles V. and Philip II.; and their suc- cessors, though among the feeblest of princes, reigned and tyrannized at pleasure. When by the policy of Louis XIV. the crown of Spain was transferred to the house of Bourbon, it served rather to diminish, than to increase, the importance of the Spanish monarchy. Since France has become a republic^ under the mild administration of Napoleon, Spain scarcely dares to assume the style or attitude of independence; but is submissively waiting to receive the fraternal embrace^ which shall forever unite her to the great nation,* • From the Iron grasp of the French, the Spanish were delivered ,by the English under Lord Wellington. " In the year 1808 fcr- 40 spAm. The geographer will perceive Portugal on the map of Europe ; and the historian will find, that it was once of some consequence as an independent state. Its present insignificance, however, and its general dependence on its more powerful neighbors, render it not worth our while to notice its history, in this very cursory survey of nations. The reader will indulge us in a few reflections on the history of Spain, before we quit the subject. It is allowed by all geographers, that Spain possesses a most delightful climate and productive soil. " No nation," says Guthrie, " owes so much to nature, and so little to industry and art, for their subsistence, as Spain." They have scarcely any winter. Their summers are long and delightful. Their lands pro- duce, and almost spontaneously, all the substantials, as well as the luxuries of life. Nature seems to have designed it, as one of the most charming coun- tries in the world. It is of great extent, and is sur- rounded by the noblest oceans and seas — has excel- lent harbors, and poi-sesses, both internally and ex- ternally, every natural advantage, which a nation could wish. 6. FRANCE. 47 the condition of his subjects. In these innportant and benevolent pursuits, he was aided by the celebrated duke of Sully, the ablest statesman of his time. In 1698, he published the famous edict of Nantz, which gave free liberty of conscience to ihe Protestants, and allowed them in the public exercise of their religion. He encouraged, or rather founded, the silk manufac- tories in France. This illustrious prince was assassinated in his chariot, in the streets of Paris, in 1610, by a wretch- ed enthusiast, whose name should never have polluted the page of history. The son and successor of Henry IV. was Lewis XIII. He, by the aid of the powerful and ambitious Richlicu, crushed, at once, the nascent liberties of France. He violated the rights of conscience, de- prived the Protestants of every privilege, and put a period to the religious struggles, which had subsisted for nearly a century, and had destroyed above a mii- lion of men. During Richlieu's administration, the famous Pro- testant league was formed among the Northern Pow- ers ; at the head of which, was the great Gustavus Adolphus, king of Sweden. This formidable combi- nation in favor of Protestantism, and which sevcicly shook the German throne, originated in the profound policy of Richlieu, the very man, who had persecuted and destroyed that cause in France. The reign of Lewis XIII. prepared France for the Augustus of modern times. He died in 1643, and left as his successor, his son, the celebrated Lewis Xiy, then in his minority. The kingdom was dis- turbed and torn by factions and intestine broils. The Protestants gathering strength on the death of Rich- lieu and Lewis, were headed by a Prince of Conde, far more celebrated than the former ; and the Catho- lics were led by the truly famous marshal Turenne, The mother of the young king assumed the adminis^ tration ; and, by the policy of Cardinal Mazarine, not I 48 FRANCE. only governed France, but was able to manoeuvre the diplomatic corps of every court in Europe. The affairs of the French government had been conducted with such consummate skill, that Lewis Xiy. when he assumed the reins, found himself one of the most absolute monarchs in the world. Early in his reign, he had the discernment and good for- tune to appoint, as his first minister, the great Colbert, as he is very justly styled. The glory of France has been essentially owing to the abilities and virtue of a series of great men, who sat at the helm of administration. In this respect it is probable, that no other nation was ever so fortunate as France. For more than a century, without any cessation, the reins of government were holden with strength, stability, dignity and wisdom. They were holden by men of the greatest genius, the most extensive views, the clearest foresight, and greatest regularity of system ; in short, by men of the utmost grandeur and elevation of mind, always acting in reference to the sublimest views of national pros- perity and greatness. Such were Sully, Richlieu, Mazarine, Colbert and some others. These things, however, cannot be said of them all, without some qualification. Though aiming, and that successfully, at national aggrandizement, yet some of their mea- sures were dictated by a degree of cruelty, pride and injustice, which cast a mournful shade over the pros- pect — otherwise splendid and noble, almost beyond mortal perfection. Lewis XIV. aided by such powerful men, enjoyed a long, glorious and important reign ; to write the history of which, would be, in effect, to write the history of Europe, during that period.* The diplo- matic science, if so it may be called, begun by his predecessors, he carried on with a much higher hand, and probably perfected. He found means to fill all the courts of Europe with penetrating eyeSj" * See Voltaire's Age of Lewis XIV» FRANCE. 49 listening ears, skilful hands and nimble feet. He plotted, negotiated, intrigued, deceived, and cajoled. Men who were ccrrupUble, he bribed ; and even bought all such as were worth his money. Flis abundant success in managing the concerns of England^ can scaixely be read without laughter, or, at any rale, without admiration. England, at that time, just landed from a disastrous voyage on ''the temj)ei!.tuous sea of libeity," was governed by the second Charles, a prince who cared for nothi.ng, but his pleai-urcs and debaucheries. If Lewis found him rather an expensive retainer, he also found the un- erring clue to manage him and his people. Money, disposed of with diplomatic skill, did the work. And it is almost incredible, that, in spite of all the virtue of England, Lewis did actually govern both parties then existing. He held them both in his hand at once, and unsuspected by them, penetrated the coun- sels, gained the confidence, and dictated the measures of both. Botli whig and tory were his tools ; and while he urged on the tyranny of the court, and in- flamed the iavviess ambition of king Charles, he blew up the living coals of patriotic lire, and organized a most extensive conspiracy, called the Rye-house Plot ; in the bosom of which, he formed a still deeper plot, to assassinate the king, and revolutionize the govern- ment. Into these dangerous and daring scliemes, he drew many of the noblest lords of England, and still more of the virtuous commons, who wefe ready to sell their lives to save their country ; but who, through an unlucky mistake, sold their consciences for hithy lucre. Lewis played the same game \u several other courts of Europe, and particularly in Sweden, whose fall may be ascribed to French seduction. The elevation of France, in this splendid reign, was not more conspicuous in her foreign relations, than in her internal circumstances. Lewis encouraged the arts and sciences; patronized men of learning j 50 FRANCE. and his reign was adorned by several men, whose names are highly respectable in the republic of letters. Ambition was the nriost conspicuous trait in the character of Lewis. But his reign was marked with various circumstances of injustice, cruehy and im- policy. The most notorious of these, was tlie revo- cation of the edict of Nantz, in 1685, passed eighty- seven years before, by his illustrious grandfather, Henry JV. This was little better than a law for ex- terminating the Protestants. They fled from his do- minions in such multitudes, as to leave many places without inhabitants. They carried with them, into other countries, and especially into England, the arts and sciences. He lost his ablest artizans and me- chanics; and from that time and that cause, England gained the ascendancy over France, as a manufactur- ing country. But the latter part of the life of Lewis XIY. as of Charles V. was as unhappy, as the first part of it was prosperous. His greatness could not raise him above adversity. For ten years, he experienced the bitter- est reverses of fortune. The powers of Europe, alarmed at his overgrown greatnes6<, and exa^pcraied by his pride and insolence, formed a combination against him. Two men appeared in tise field, who were able to humble his vanity, and rescue F^urope from his oppression. The Austrian armies were commanded by prince Eugene, and the English, by the duke of Marlborough, one of the most celebrated commanders of modern times, and thought, by some, never to have been excelled in any age or nation. Marlborough and Eugene defeated and cut in pieces whatever forces Lewis sent into the field ; they took from him roost of his conquests; they entered his do- niinions with their victorious armies, and spread a ter- ror and consternation not much inferior to that of Henry V. In short, they shook the foundations of his throne, and not only humbled the haughty tyrant, but made him tremble for his crown and empire. PRANCE. 51 This desolating war wag closed at the peace of Utrecht in 1713; and France, by the preposterous policy of the British ministry, was snved from a vic- torious arm, which seemed ah!e to have recovered and re-established the claims of H^nry V. and to have given law to thp great natioru Two years after the peace of Utrecht, on the first of September, 1715, Lewis XI y. expired, aft*^r having experienced the vicissitudes of fortune, and exhibited an example of this truth, that no mortal, however exaltrd, is beyond the reach of the shafts of affliction and adversity. Lewis mi^jht have said with hir brotlier Charles V. that *• Fortune, like other females, loves to confer her favors upon young men." The ancient monarchy of France, especially during the Feudal System, was extremely limited. The spirit of freedom and independence, which prevailed in Europe, was no where more visible, than in France. The people held various important and powerful checks upon the crown. But these, for want of a proper balance and distribution of powers, wore grad- ually away; and the royal prerogative prevailed against justice and inalienable right. Yet still the flame of liberty would, at times, break forth and burn with great strength, till it was wasted by its own im- petuosity, or extinguished by the regular advances of despotic power. Next to the reign of Augustus, that of Lewis XIV. was most successful in quelling, silenc- ing, and utterly destroying, all notions of civil liberty and of equal rights. The French people were se- verely taught to tremble at the power and resentment of Lewis ; they were fascinated by his artful, winning and insidious wiles; they were astonished and won over by his munificence; they were dazzled by his glory ; and they were made to believe, that to " bask in the meridian blaze" of so splendid a monarchy, was their highest happiness. The reign of Lewis XV. was distinguished by few events worthy of particular notice in this brief sur- B2 FRANCE. vey. Ambitious without abilities, and proud without energy, his life wasted away in the fading splendors of a court, so lately illuminated by a monarch of su- perior powers. During this reign, the principal ob- jects, which will engage the attention of ihe reader of histury, are the capture of the island of Corsica; the suppression of the Jesuits in France; the causes of the gradual decline of the power and importance of France among the powers of Europe. But for the investigation of these subjects, the reader must be referred to other histories of France. On the 10th of May, 1774, the unfortunate Lewis XVI. ascended the throne. We have now arrived at a period, in which our readers are acquainti d with many more incidents, than can have a place in this work. We shall close on this article by stating a very few things, which are most commonly known, concerning one of the most important, most eventful revolutions recorded in the annals of time 5 a revolu- tion, which derives importance to us, on account of our commercial and political relations ; and especially by reason of its very recent date, and the vast conse- quences likely to flow from it. It has been generally thought, that France never enjoyed a more amiable, a more virtuously disposed monarch, than Lewis XVL His misfortune from nature, if that can be called a misfortune, in which both kings and people are so generally involved, was the want of those extraordinary powers of mind, which are always useful, and, on certain emergencies, indispensable in kings. It is doubtful, whether, if he had possessed the mental powers of some of his pre- decessors, he would not have suppressed the revolu- tionizing spirit, and preserved the tranquility of his dominions. So far from doing that, when the storm arose, the weaknesses he betrayed, increased the tumult, drew destruction upon himself, and the guilt of innocent blood upon his country. FRANCE. 53 We often contemplate, with horror, the excessive sufferings of mankind through the tyranny and op- pression of their rulers. We as often wonder, that any rational being, endowed with passions, and at all capable of self-defence or of revenge, will endure what so large a proportion of mankind endure from their fellow-creatures, w^iO govern them. They are insulted, degraded, and tampled in the dust. Their rights are torn from ti em — they are deprived of every enjoyment. The scanty earnings of their painful labors must be cheerfully given up, to pamper the luxury of a wanton wretch, before whom they must cringe, and bow, and adore. Why will they endure all this? Because, alas ! their case is hopeless. Their disease admits no remedy. The experience of all ages and nations has confirmed and illustrated the truth, that insurrection, revenge and revolution, do but plunge them deeper in misery, and expedite their destruction. Lewis XIV. as already noted, had extinguished every ray of liberty, and even of hope; and his im- mediate successor had neither virtue nor abilities to remedy the evils of the government, or the sufferings of the people. The clergy, the nobility, and the king, were each of them at the head of a separate system of tyranny; so that, in addition to the most cruel and odious oppression of the clergy, the people were crushed by an immense monarchy, and ground to powder by a still more formidable aristocracy. Many, therefore, took part in the revolution from a just and laudable desire to remedy their condition. Having little fear of a worse state, they were determined to try to obtain a better. A strong remembrance of the recent fall and ruin of the Jesuits, taught them how easily the most powerful men are overthrown, when the multitude are roused and determined to take vengeance. The restless spirit which predisposes many far tumult and commotion, was a powerful mover in the 25 54 FRANCE. revolution. Such love to be in a bustle. The noise of an uproar is to them the sweetest music. Even the cry o( fire gives them a kind of ecstasy, provided their own hovel is not in danger. They love to rush with a multitude into enterprise ; and by how much greater is their number, by so much fiercer their en- thusiasm flames. Although such men are the scum or dregs of society, they are fit tools in a revolution ; and seldom would any great and sudden revolution take place without them. Luckily for the revolu- tionist, they are found in abundance in all nations, and especially in France. The more enlightened people of France, had no hope of erecting a free and virtuous republic upon the ruins of monarchy. Their utmost wish extend- ed only to a salutary reform in the government. They wished to limit the royal prerogative, and open some prospect for the encouragement of industry and laudable enterprise, by giving security to property. No people will be industrious, unless they can be made secure in the fruits of their labor. The peo- ple of France had no security in this respect. A large portion of their income must go to replenish the royal revenue; another portion must be paid into the church-treasury, to augment the enormous wealth of tyrannical, haughty and vicious clergy. Besides all this, every poor man washable to the exactions of bis master, land-holder or temporal lord. Each of these species of exactions was ordinary or extraordi- nary; when ordinary, they took a great part of a man's earnings ; when extraordinary, they took all. Thus a wretched laborer was often stripped of all he had, and then, to complete his misery, dragged to the fleet or army, and forced to leave his family to perish for want of bread. To remedy these monstrously overgrown evils, be- nevolent people were willing to set a revolution on foot, tending merely to a salutary reform ; but while they were carefully nursing the tender infant^ and TRANCIJ, 55 fostering it with gentlest hands, like Hercules, it rose formidable from its cradle, and crushed them to death hy thousands and bj millions. In truth, the vail sud- denly dropped from the eyes of the people, and they saw, in their full light, the horrors of their condition. With one universal, strong, reiterated struggle, ihey attempted to rise, and plunged themselves " ten ihou- sond fathom deep,'''' The prevalence of infidel philosophy, or, as it has been styled, llluminism, in France, had a powerful influence in bringing about the revolution. Those philosophers, with great apparent justice, availed themselves of the enormous corruptions of the reli- gious orders, and the abuses of Christianity abounding in the church ; they ridiculed the idea of the divine right of kings, and artfully laid open the oppressive tyranny of civil government. Under a robe, which, to the unwary observer, appeared pure and spotless, they concealed the most atrocious, vile and blas- phemous sentiments concerning all government, both human and divine. They set up human reason as the only light, the only standard of authority, the only deity in the universe. They wished to bring mardiin'd into such a perfect state of freedom, that all restraint upon their conduct should be laid aside, together with all distinction of property. They wished to abolish, absolutely, all law, to annihilate all ohliiJ^alion, and, in a word, all distinction betwee^n virtue and vice. This dangerous philosophy prevailed in France; and among its disciples, were many of the most emi- nent literary characters in the kingdom. Indeed, it pervaded all orders of people ; and men of this de- scription filled the universities, sustained the most important offices of state, and were, in great numbers, in the court and about the person of the king. The savor of their doctrines, and the weight of personal influence, put in motion, by degrees, innumerable wheels apd springs of the revolution ; and, when they 55 »RAN«E. perceived things going according to their wish, they were at hand to project the most dangerous and daring schemes, and to develope the horrid extent of their views and wishes. The armies of France had been e3^e-witnes?es of the success of the American revolution. They had seen a glimpse of the independence, freedom and happi- ness of the United States ; and had imbibed a portion of the same heroic, invincible spirit, which animated the fathers of our happy country. Glowing with sj^m- pathy and delight, they carried the borrowed flame across the Atlantic. They painted, in lively colors, to their countrymen, the pleasing sceries they had witnessed; and they affected, most powerfully, the imaginations of that gay and volatile people, with dreams of fancied bliss. They said to themselves, " Shall the Americans alone be free ? and must Frenchmen forever groan with painful servitude ?" Each peasant became a politician ; and freedom was all his theme. Liberty inspired the speculations of the philosopher and the maxims and dogmas of the sage. It resounded in the ditties of the milk-maid and plough-boy, and enlivened the songs of the shep- herd and shepherdess. Unhappy people ! Would to Heaven you might have gained and long enjoyed, that rational freedom, which you saw at a distance, hut could never realize ! In a word, the wild enthusiasm seized the lower orders ; it ascended to the higher ranks of people, and surrounded and overturned the throne. Its progress was like that of fire ; and its devestations like those of the destroying angel. Multituiles of men pushed forward the revolution, actuated only by the base and selfish consideration, that a popular form of government gives power and consequence to much the greatest number of men ; and of course, gives greater hopes of rising to each individual. They view republicanism as a lottery, more favoraljle to their ambitious hopes, than mon- archy. Such- wretched patriots are the curse, the PRANCE. Sll plague, the torment, and, indeed, the final ruin and eternal disgrace of all republics. At first, they can- not be distinguished from the virtuous and honest man, who truly loves his country. They bring, of course, all honest men into suspicion. They use the language and put on the garb of virtue. They cover their designs so deeply with hypocrisy and lies, that they are often not unveiled but by their fatal and deadly mischief. Men of this cast, are far more use- ful in pulling down, than in building up, states and governments. Any incendiary can burn a palace; but a skilful artist alone can build one. The revolu- tionist seldom considers, that if he pulls down his government, and has not strength and skill to build another, he must either inevitably perish in anarchy, or must set some master-workman to building for liim ; and that the fabricator of the new government becomes his new master, and often proves a greater tyrant than the former. It is a just remark, that the most despotic governments are generally the offspring of great revolutions. Thus, a revolution in Syracuse raised up Dionysias ; the downfall of Pisistratus, in Athens, produced Pericles ; a revolt from Rehoboam, in Israel, raised up Jeroboam ; the destruction of Julius Cesar elevated Augustus; Charles II. sprang out of Cromwell's revolution ; and, the revolution in France, which has indeed overturned the throne of Clovis, has produced a new one for the conqueror of Europe. The general character of the moral and political writings, which prevailed in the latter part of the seventeenth and former part of the eighteenth cen- turies, especially in England and France, had a pow- erful influence in the great events, which have changed the face of Europe. But we shall close this article for the present, and reserve the nature and effects of this important revolution, to be considered, when, in a subsequent chapter, we shall speak of tb^ present state of Europeo 58 NORTHERN POWERS* CHAPTER VIL CONTINUATION OF THE VIEW OF EUROPE. NORTHERN POWERS. THE northern powers, viz. Denmark, Sweden and Russia, may be considered under one head, as it re- lates to several essential articles of their general his- tory. They make no figure in ancient history, and very little in modern, till since the beginning of the sixteenth century. The Danes, indeed, under Canute* the Great, after frequently invading, conquered Eng- land in the eleventh century, and established a new dynasty. This was overthrown by William the Con- queror; and the Danes make no appearance worthy of notice, till the fourteenth century : when, in 1397, Margaret, by the peace of Calmar, was acknowledged queen of Sweden, Denmark and Norway. The great abilities, with which she acquired and got'erned this immense dominion, gained her the title of the Semi- ramis of the North. The political importance of Denmark has been gradually diminishing for several centuries. It has generally performed the office of satellite to some of the chief luminaries of Europe ; and its history will be found to afford little to profit or to please. The extremely imperfect view we have given of the North of Europe, renders it necessary, that we enlarge a little, in this place, to present to the reader, * It was principally by Swein, the father of Canute, that the English were conquered j and it is a question, whether Swein should not be considered as the first Danish king of En^^land. — It does not appear to be quite correct to say, that the Danish dynasty was overthrown by William the Conqueror. On the death of Hardicanute, 25 years before the Conquest, the Danish succes- sion was set aside, and the Saxon line restored in the person of Edward the Confessor ; and the Saxon line was continued in Harold, the successor of Edward, whom ^yilUam conquered and slew.— Ed, KDRTHERN POWERS. 69 a more general sketch of the history of Denmark and Sweden. And as we cannot delineate, at full length, even a skeleton of modern nations, we have judged it most useful to touch upon such parts of the histories of these nations, as arc in themselves most important. When we turn our eyes toward the North of Eu- rope, we have before us, to use the elegant expression of Dr. Robertson, " the storehouse of nations," and as it has been often called, the '' northern hive." The countries beyond the Rhine, extending north- wardly along the shores of the Atlantic to the Scag- gerac sea, indeed, from the Adriatic to the Baltic, were anciently denominated Germany ; and those countries in the early times of modern Europe were regarded as appendages of the German empire. The people of those countries, though extremely fierce and warlike, were of a grade of intellect far above mere savages. The Romans, in the height of their power, found them formidable enemies ; and they were, at length, the conquerors of Rome, and the founders of the presciit nations of Europe. We seem almost compelled to believe, that the northern parts of Europe, were once more populous than they are at present-, and they certainly were far more warlike. If their populousness has expe- rienced a decline, it must probably have been owing to the frequency of their emigrations, and to other causes of a less obvious nature. The refinements of modern times, in connexion with the nature of their climate and situation, have produced effects on their governments, manners and customs, unfavorable to population and a martial spirit. On the one hand, they have not sufficient motives to industry ; without which their cold and sterile climate must render them indigent and wretched : and on the other, they have not sufficient exercise in arms, nor motives to war ; without which they must grow eifeminate and cow- ardly. In the history of governments, nothing is more astonishing, than that the sovereigns of nations 6P NORTHERN POWERS, have not been impressed with this truth, that their people will not be industrious without a motive, nor brave without an example. Denmark, which had made a figure under the great Canute, in the eleventh century, and given a new dynasty of monarchs to England, appears little more in history for nearly two hundred years : when, for a short time, it rose and became illustrious under a fe- male reign. Margaret was daughter of WaldemaF III. king of Denmark. She had been married to Hacquin, king of Norway, who was the son of Magnus, king of Sweden. This commencement of her eleva* tion awakened that ambition, and began to display those powers, which soon made her the greatest monarch, which then had ever reigned in the North of Europe. Olaus, the son of Margaret, in right of his father, inherited the crown of Norway, that of Sweden, by his grandfather, and that of Denmark, by his mother. For although thos?e crowns were then elective, yet that election seldom deviated from the lineal course, where there was a prospect of adequate abilities. But, Olaus dying, Margaret was chosen by the states of Denmark, who, already, had satisfactory proofs of her capacity to discharge the duties of that high sta- tion, while she had acted as queen regent of Norway. She was soon after elected queen of Norway. The Swedes, at this time, were governed by Albert of Mecklenburg, who, having become odious by his tyrannies, they made a tender of their crown and fealty to the illustrious Margaret. At the head of an army, she marched into Sweden, expelled her rival, and immediately took possession of the throne and government. Margaret, being now invested with the government of Norway, Sweden and Denmark, projected the scheme of the celebrated union of Calmar. At that place she assembled the states of the three kingdoms, and by their united voice, a solemn decree was passed^ NORTIiERN POWERS. 61 !he substance of which is comprised in the following articles : I. That Sweden, Denmark and Norway should thenceforth have but one sovereign : II. That the sovereign should be chosen alternate- ly by each of these kingdoms, and that the election should be ratified by the other two : II!. That each nation should retain its own laws, customs, privileges and dignities : IV. That the natives of one kingdom should not be raised to posts of honor or profit in another, but should be reputed foreigners out of their own country. A minute detail of the reign of Margaret will not be expected. It will be sufficient to observe, that, considering the age, in which she lived, the rude and barbarous nations, over whom she swayed the sceptre, and the grand objects she effected during her reign, few monarchs have been more capable of sustaining the weight of empire. Hers was one of the three female reigns, which have taken place in modern limes, that will ever be illustrious in the annals of na- tions. The names of Margaret, Elizabeth and Cath- arine, at least are sufficient to rescue their sex from the indiscriminate imputation of weakness. The union of Calmar, which took place in the last year of ti^e fourteenth century, though it could not but remain unshaken during the vigoious reign of Margaret, from its nature could not continue long. States and kingdoms cannot be permanently united, but by a union of interests, policy, manners and sen- timents. The evident partiality, which Blargaret liad shown for her Danish subjects, became so visible in Eric, her successor, as to excite a general odium throughout Sweden. The Swedes, accordingly re- volted from Denmark, and elected for their monarch Charles Canutson, descended from the family of ]3onde. Soon after, however, they re-established the union of Calmar — thus revolting and returning again to their connexion three times in the space of about 62 NORTHERN POWERS. fifty years ; till at length they were conquered and enslaved, by Christian IT. king of Denmark, known by the name of the Nero of the North. These revolutions and struggles gradually diminish- ed the power of Denmark, and opened the way for the final separation, independence and elevation of ►Sweden. Of this, we shall give an account some- what more particular, which we take from Russell's Modern Europe. In 1442 the Swedes revolted from Christian I. king of Denmark, and invested with the administration of their government, Steen Sture. The cause of this revolt may be clearly traced, in the extreme partiali- ty of the Danish monarchs to their own particular subjects, which often led them into acts of tyranny the most atrocious, and even subversive of the fun- damental articles of the confederation of those king- dT>ms. The succession of Sture's son to the regency of Sweden, although it was generally approved by the Aation, was vigorously opposed by Gustavus Trolle, archbishop of Upsal and primate of Sweden. This haughty prelate, whose father had been among the candidates for the regency, persisting in his opposi- tion to young Sture's administration, was at length besieged in his castle of Steeka, was taken prisoner, deposed by a diet of the kingdom, and stripped of all his offices ecclesiastical and civil. Trolle, in his distress, made applicalion to Leo X, a most powerful, accomplished and ambitious pontiff. The pope, ready to espouse the cause of the deposed primate, immediately excommunicated the regent and the party that adhered to him, consisting of most of the nobility of Sweden. The execution of this bull, Leo committed to the bloody Christian II. king of Denmark. The history of the following events, opens one of the most horrid scenes, recorded in the annals of mankind. Pursuant to the order of Leo X. the king of Den- mark invaded Sweden, with a powerful army. He NORTHERN POWERS. 63 was encountered by the Swedes in great force, and met with so severe a check, that he was forced to change his plan of open hostilities for one of the most execrable and enormous treachery. He proposed to treat with the Swedish regent, and offered to proceed in person to Stockholm, provided the Swedes would deliver to him six noble youths, as hostages for his own safety. These terms were accepted ; and accordingly, six young men, of illustrious birth, were delivered into the power of this bloody, per- fidious monster, and were put on board the Danish fleet. Christian, now supposing that he had all the advan- tage of the Swedes, necessary to bring them to any terms, instead of entering, as was proposed, into an amicable accommodation with the regent, immedi- ately carried the Swedish hostages prisoners to Den- mark. Of this number the celebrated Gustavus Vasa was one. Like the great Alfred of England, he learned in the school of adversity, those lessons of wisdom, temperance and fortitude, which afterwards enabled him to give law to the North of Europe. In the following year, 1520, Christian II. returned to the invasion of Sweden, with a still greater force. Steen Sture met and encountered him in West Goth- land ; but being entrapped in an ambuscade, was mor- tally wounded. The army of Sweden immediately- dispersed ; and the victorious Dane, thirsting for blood, marched directly to Stockholm. On his arrival at the capital, he found nothing but terror, irresolu- tion and despair among the Swedes. Trolle, howev- er, now resuming his archiepiscopal functions, under the conquering standard of Denmark, immediately proclaimed Christian king of Sweden. The victori- ous monarch affected the greatest possible clemency, and swore to govern Sweden, not as a conqueror, but in a manner mild and beneficent, as though he had been chosen by a regular diet of the empire, and by the voice of the people. 64 .NORTHERN POWERS. His coronation feast was sunnptuous and superb. To this, all the senators, grandees and nobility of Sweden were invited, and indeed allured by the ap- parent generosity, openness and munificence of the new king. After the feast had lasted three days, in the midst of the greatest security, hilarity and joy, the archbishop reminded the king, that although he had pardoned all offences by a general amnesty, yet no satisfaction had been given to the pope, in whose holy name, he now demanded justice. An army in- stantly rushed into the hall, and secured all the guests that were obnoxious. The archbishop immediately opened hirf spiritual court, proceeded against them as heretics, and condemned them to death. A scaffold was erected before the palace gate ; and ninety-four persons were executed ; among whom was Eric Vasa, father to the celebrated Gustavus, who was at this time a prisoner in Denniark. Thus fell the nobility of Sweden, accused of no crime, but that of defending the liberties of their coun- try. And when we consider all the circumstances of this horrid butchery, and especially, that it laid claim to the sanction of Christ's benevolent religion, there is not a more shocking occurrence to be found iji history. The subsequent account of this barbarous tyrant leaves little room to doubt, that Divine Justice saw fit to make itself visible for his punishment, even in this world. Death often lurks in the insidious smiles of a tyrant; and the voice of all history and of all experience loudly declares, that he is never to be trusted. It shall suffice to observe, that Christian II. soon experienced a total reverse of fortune. His crimes and cruelties rendered him odious to the people of his own kingdom. He was deposed by them, and compelled to flee, a wretched exile into the Low Countries. He endeavored in vain to obtain the as- sistance of Charles V. his brother-in-law ; and after various struggles, died miserably in prison j " a fate," NORTHERN TOWERS. 66 ?ays our author, " too gentle for so barbarous a ty- rant." Frederic, Duke of llolstein, Christian's uncle, succeeded to the throne of Denmark and Norway ; and as for Sweden, she not only shook off the Danish yoke ; but we shall presently see her giving law to the North, and menacing the South of Europe. In the mean time, Gustavus Vasa,, with the other five hostages, was treacherously imprisoned in Den- mark, as before mentioned. From prison, he soon found means to escape, and finding himself pursued, fled in disj^uise, and liid himself in the mines of Dale- carlia, where he labored for his daily support with the miners. Among the rude inhabitants of that country, he soon began to attract admiration. They were charmed with his popular talents and winning address. His form was athletic, noble and command- ing ; and his uncommon strength and agility gave hinn a ready ascendency among his rustic associates. Per- ceiving their utter detestation of the tyranny of the Danes, he took the opportunity of disclosing to them his extraction, at an annual feast. He made himself known, and offered himself as their leader, by a just war, to set his country i'lee, and avenge the blood of her most illustrious patriots. The people listened to him with astonishment ; and regarding him as a saviour sent from heaven, they flocked from al! quarters to his standard. He immedi- ately attacked the Danish governor of the province; and taking his castle by storm, put the Danes to the sword. In short, nothing could exceed the rapidity of his motions; and in wars and revolutions, celerity is alway^s the best insurance of success. He crushed all opposition; every imperei^n wars Innumerabie and almost incessant, the Englisti have had, according ic the t:nuineri>iIon of Le Sage, 16 civii wars and 9 religious oommrtions, since ttie Conquest. In the language of Goldsmith, Ent,larid may well be denominaled a land