E 415 
 .9 
 •P4 C7 
 
 Copy 1 
 
.9 
 
 .pA CT 
 
 CopV ^ 
 
 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD 
 
 U-^ 
 
 O F 
 
 H 
 
 GEO. H. PENDLETON. 
 
 LIBRftRY OF CONGRESS 
 
 011 895 711 8 
 
 t 
 
GEORGE H. PENDLETON, 
 
 CANDIDATE FOR VICE-PRESIDENT. ^ ^i^ 
 
 .«••* <> AC 
 
 George H. Pendleton, now the candidate of the Democratic party, for the 
 second office in the gift of the American people, has persistently pursued in 
 Congress that course most calculated to encourage l^he armed enemies of the 
 country, and to foster secession and treason of all kinds and grades. 
 
 We therefore accuse him upon the face of his record as a public man. 
 
 Who has consented to a division of the country. 
 
 Who has opposed the raising of armies to suppress the rebellion. 
 
 Who has opposed the raising of revenues and loans to support our armies, to 
 pay the interest on the public debt, and maintain the public credit. 
 
 Who has opposed the punishment of armed traitors and defended their pro- 
 perty and other interests. 
 
 Who has endeavored to shield the unarmed traitors and spies in the loyal 
 States from the consequences of their crimes, by preventing the suspension of 
 the writ of Jtabeas corpus, which suspension is provided by the Constitution to 
 meet the case of such criminals. 
 
 Who has endeavored in all his public acts to prevent any injury to the insti- 
 tution of slavery, Avhich is the cause of all the expense, suffering, and bloodshed 
 that has befallen the country during the last three years. 
 
 Who has been crying Peace ! when he well knew that peace could only come 
 by compellip.^ the rebels to yield to lawful authority or by a division of the 
 country. /' 
 
 — Who has invited the intervention of the Monarchs of Europe in our domestic 
 troubles by opposing every declaration of Congress against it. 
 
 Who has opposed legislation to maintain the constitutional guarantee of a 
 republican form of government to States whose recognized governments had been 
 overthrown by a powerful and unlawful organization.- 
 
 Who has in many ways endeavored to embarrass and hinder the constituted 
 authorities in their efforts to vindicate the Union and Constitution from the 
 attacks of rebels and traitors. 
 
 And for the truth of this accusation, we appeal to the record of his public 
 acts. 
 
 Mr. Vallandigham, in 1861, introduced in Congress a resolution to amend the 
 Constitution, which might more justly be called a resolution to encourage and 
 legalize secession, from which the following are extracts : 
 
 Article xiir. 
 
 Section 1. The United States are divided into four sections, as follows: 
 
 The States of Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New 
 York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania, and all new Slates annexed and admitted into the Union, or 
 formed or erected within the jurisdiction of any of said States, or by the junction of two or more of 
 the same or of parts thereof, or out of territory acquired north of said States, shall constitute one 
 section, to be known as the North. 
 
 The States of Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, and Kansas, and 
 all new States annexed or admitted into the Union, or erected within the jurisdiction of any of said 
 States, or by the junction of two or more of the same or of parts thereof or out of territory now 
 held or hereafter acquired north of latitude thirty-six degrees thirty minutes and east of the crest 
 of the Rocky mountains, shall constitute another section, to be known as the West. 
 
 The States of Oregon and California, and all new States annexed and admitted into the Union, or 
 formed or erected within the jurisdiction of any of said States, or by the junction of two or more of 
 the same or of parts thereof, or out of territory now held or hereafter acquired west of the crest of 
 the Rocky mountains and of the Rio Grande, shall constitute another section, to be known as the 
 Pacific. 
 
 The States of Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, 
 Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, Texas, Arkansas, Tennessee, Kentucky, and Missouri, and all 
 new States annexed and admitted into the Union, or formed or erected within the jurisdiction of 
 any of said States, or by the junction of two or more of the same or of parts thereof, or out of terri- 
 tory acquired east of the Rio Grande and south of latitude thirty-six degrees thirty minutes, shall 
 constitute another section, to be known as the South. 
 
8 
 
 AbTIOLE XIV. 
 
 No Stnte shall secede witTiout the consent of the Legislatures of all the States of the section to 
 which the State pt-oposing to secede belongs. The President shall have power to adjust wiih seced- 
 ing States all questions arising by reason of their secession ; but the terms of adjustment shall be 
 Bubmitted to the Congress for their approval before the same shall be valid. 
 
 Mr. Pendleton could see nothing wrong in these propositions, and as late as 
 January, 18G8, defended them in the House. 
 
 At the session of Congress beginning in December, 1862, he opposed, in all 
 its stages, the bill " to raise additional soldiers for the service of the Govern- 
 ment." 
 
 He, with other Copperheads, in the House of Representatives, on the 28th of 
 January, 1803, succeeded, by motions "to adjourn," " to lay on the table," for 
 " a call of the House," " to excuse members for not voting," &c., &c., in pre- 
 venting the House from coming to a vote on that bill, until, having sat all night, 
 it adjourned at half-past five on the morning of the 29th. The vote on the final 
 passage of the bill was reached February 2, 1863, when he voted against the 
 bill. 
 ' At the same session he opposed, in all its stages, the bill "for enrolling and 
 calling out the national forces, and for other purposes," and voted against the 
 bill on its final passage, February 25, 1863. 
 
 And at the last session of Congress, he opposed, in all its stages, the bill to 
 nmend the act calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the Union, sup- 
 press insurrection and repel invasion, and pur.?ued the same course on all bills 
 relating to the same subject. 
 
 January 11, 1864, he voted against tbe following: 
 
 Whereas the burden of government should be made to fall as nearly equally as possible upon all 
 parts of the country ; and whereas the southern portion of the country has for several 3'eMrs con- 
 tributed little, either in men or money, toward the support of the Government; and whereas almost 
 the only way to get men from that portion is to take black men ; and whereas for every bhick man 
 enlisted in the South some man in the overburdened North may be exempted from the draft, 
 
 It is therefore hereby declared to he the sense of this house that the Government should use its 
 most strenuous ettorts to procure the voluntary enlistment of persons claimed as slaves iu the rebel 
 territory, by giving tiiem the full bounty and pay of other soldiers, and by guaranteeing their free- 
 dom, at once, upon enlistment. 
 
 And during the last session, by many other votes, endeavored to prevent tha 
 filling up of our armies. 
 
 He has opposed, in every way known to legislative fillibusters, the passage 
 of bills for raising a revenue sufficient to pay the army and navy, and provide 
 ihera with the means necessary to prosecute the war. 
 
 July 10, 1861, in company with Vallandigham, Yoorhees, Wood, i*'^d six 
 others of like stripe, he voted against the bill further to provide for tY' illec- 
 tion of duties, imports, and other purposes. 1 
 
 July 29, 1861, he voted against the bill to provide additional revL. ..,.l°5- 
 defraying the expenses of Government, and maintaining public credit. 
 
 August 2, 1861, he voted against the bill reported by a committee of confer- 
 ence of the two Houses to provide increased revenues from imports to pay the 
 interest on the public debt, and for other purposes. 
 
 February 7, 1862, he voted against the bill to authorize the issue of United 
 States notes, and for the redemption and funding thereof, and for funding the 
 floating debt of the United States. 
 
 April 8, 1862, with Vallandigham, Voorhees, and twelve others, he voted 
 against the passage of the bill to provide internal revenue to support the 
 Government and pay the interest on the public debt. 
 
 June 24, 1862, he voted against the bill " to authorize the issue of demand 
 Treasury notes." 
 
 July 14, 1862, he voted against the bill "to impose an additional duty on 
 sugars produced in the United States." 
 
 He has opposed all propositions to confiscate property of rebels, whether 
 used for insurrectionary purposes or not. 
 
August 2, 1861, he voted to lay on the table the bill to confiscate rtjprope 
 used for insurrectionary purposes. 
 
 August 3, again voted to lay the bill on the table, and on the same day voted 
 against the bill on its final passage. 
 
 At the session beginning December, 1861, he voted, May 26, 1862, against 
 the House bill 471, to confiscate the property of rebels for the payment of the 
 expenses of the present rebellion, and for other purposes. 
 
 July 15, 1862, he opposed Mr. Maynard's resolution explanatory of "An 
 act to suppress rebellion, to punish treason and insurrection, to seize and con- 
 fiscate property of rebels, and for other purposes." 
 
 June 4th, 1862, he voted against the bill declaring disloyal persons ineligible 
 to office. 
 
 June 9th, 1862, he voted against the following resolution: 
 
 Resolved, That, in the judgment of this House, the Commander-in-Chief of the Army and Navy of 
 the United States should instruct all of his officers, holding command in districts of country in 
 rebellion against the Government, to make proclamation that henceforth the armies of the Republic 
 shall be subsisted, so far as practicable, upon the property of all those who are in rebellion, or are 
 giving aid and comfort to the enemies of the United States. 
 
 January 12th, 1863, he voted against the following resolution : 
 
 Resolved, That the Committee on Militarj^ Affairs be and are hereby instructed to inquire into 
 the expediency and necessity of granting a bounty laud warrant of 160 acres of land to every 
 soldier now serving in our army, or who may hereafter enlist in any of the old regiments, the land 
 warrants to be located on any confiscated rebel plantation which the holder of the warrant may 
 select, as soon as the war is ended and the rebellion crushed, and report by bill or otherwise. 
 
 He opposed the bill to provide for the collection of abandoned property, and 
 for the prevention of frauds in insurrectionary districts within the United States. 
 He moved, March 3d, ]863, to lay the bill on the table; and by a multitude 
 of other votes has opposed any punishment of the rebels now in arms against 
 the Government. 
 
 He opposed the bill " to indemnify the President and other persons for sus- 
 pending the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus," and voted against the bill 
 on its passage in the House, December 8th, 1863. 
 
 He opposed all efforts of the two Houses to agree on the details of the bill, 
 and finally voted against agreeing to the report of the committee of conference, 
 March 2d, 1863, and has opposed every proposition for the suspension of the 
 privilege of the writ of habeas corpus in the cases which, if any, the constitu- 
 tional provision was intended to cover. 
 
 January 17th, 1862, he voted against the following proposition : 
 
 " Thalfrovi and after (he passage of (his act there shall be neither slavery nor involuntary servitude 
 in any of the Territories of the United States now existing, or which may at any time hereafter be formed 
 ^^^'■cquired by (he United States, othcrivii>e than in punishment of crimes whereof the party shall have 
 duly convicted." ^ 
 
 He voted, February 26, 1862, against establishing the following Article of 
 War: 
 
 Article — . All officers or persons in the military and naval service of the United States are 
 prohibited from employing any of the forces under their respective commands for the purpose of 
 returning fugitivt's from service or labor, who may have escaped from any persons to whom such 
 service or labcn* is claimed to be due. Any officer who shall be found guilty by court-martial of 
 violating this article, shall be dismissed from the service. 
 
 He voted, April 11th, 1862, against the bill for the release of certain persons 
 held to service or labor in the District of Columbia. 
 
 He voted May 26th, 1862, against th-e bill to free from servitude the slaves 
 of rebels engaged in abetting the existing rebellion against the Government of 
 the United States. 
 
 June 9th, 1862, he voted against the following resolution: 
 Resolved, That the Committee on the Judiciary be instructed to report a bill modifying the fugi- 
 tive slave law ; also as to require a jury trial in all cases where the party claimed denies, under oath, 
 that he is a slave, and so requiring any claimant under such act to prove that he has been loyal to 
 the Government during the present rebellion. . ■ 
 
 And by many other votes of like character sustained the institution of slavery 
 — the cause of this cruel rebellion, which has drenched our country in blood. 
 
He opposed the passage of the following resolutions : 
 
 Resolved by the House of .Representatives of the United States in Congress assembled: 1. That tlio 
 rebellion, on the part of the seceding States against the Government and laws of this Union, was 
 deliberately wicked and without reasonable cause; the compact of the Union being perpetual, no 
 State has the constitutional power to forcibly secede, and that there was no grievance, real or im- 
 aginary, upon the part of the seceding States, for the redress of which the Constitution does not 
 furnish ample remedies. 
 
 2. That the rebellion, being in contravention of the Constitution and laws, it is the duty of 
 the Government to put it down, without regard to cost or the consequences that may befall those 
 engaged in it, and all necessary constitutional means for this purjiose, and this alone, should be 
 furnished by the people. That inasmuch as the great and wicked crime invoked the power of the 
 sword, the war should be prosecuted with all the vigor and strength and means of the Federal 
 Government till rebellion be subdued, and no longer. 
 
 3. That an honorable peace is desirable ; but no peace while armed opposition menaces the capi- 
 tal, and threatens the overthrow of the Union ; nor that peace which would be established upon the 
 dismembered fragments of a mighty and prosperous nation; and that man who would entertain 
 peace upon these conditions ia a traitor to his country, and unworthy the protection of its 
 laws. 
 
 4. That the war was inaugurated solely for the suppression of the rebellion and the restoration 
 of the Union as it was: that any and ail attempts to change or divert this line of policy, is a fraud 
 upon the nation, a fraud upon the memory of the gaUant men who sacrificed their lives, and a 
 fraud upon the living soldiers who now stand up as a wall between their loved country and its 
 wicked invaders. 
 
 5. That the value of dollars and cents does not enter into the momentous question of the mainte- 
 nance of popular liberty, or the preservation of a free Government, any more than the lives and 
 comfort of the traitors who have conspired iir leagued together for their destruction. 
 
 6. That the Union restored, the war should cease, and the seceding States be received back into 
 the Union, with all the privileges and immunities to which they were originally entitled. 
 
 He voted, December 17, 1863, against the following resolutions: 
 
 Resolved, That our country, and the very existence of the best Government ever instituted by man, 
 are imperilled by the must causeless and wicked rebellion that the world has ever seen ; and be- 
 lieving, as we do. that the only hope of saving this country and preserving this Government is by 
 the power of the sword, we are for the most vigorous prosecution of the war, until the ('onstitution 
 and the laws shall be enforced and obeyed in all pan-ts of the United States; and to that end we 
 oppose any armistice, or intervention, or mediation, or proposition for peace from any quarter, so 
 long as there shall be found a rebel in arms against the Government ; and we ignore all party names, 
 lines and issues, and recognize but two parties in this war — patriots and traitors. 
 
 Resolved, That we hold it to be the duty of Congress to pass all necessary bills to supply men and 
 money, and the duty of the people to render every aid in their power to the constituted authorities 
 of the Government in the crushing out of the rebellion, and in bringing the leaders thereof to con- 
 dign punishment. 
 
 This resolution was adopted by a vote of yeas 153, nay 1. The nay was Mr. 
 Pendleton's particular friend, Benjamin G. Harris, of Maryland. 3Ir. Pendle- 
 ton dodged. 
 
 December 21, 1863, when a joint resolution, providing for deficiencies' in 
 former appropriations for the army, was under consideration, Mr. Harding, of 
 Kentucky, moved the following amendment : 
 
 Provided. That no part of the money aforesaid shall be applied to the raising, arming, equipping 
 or paying of negro soldiers. 
 
 The amendment was rejected by a vote of yeas 41, nays 105 — Mr. Pendleton 
 voting with the minority. The negro troops were then in actual service, so that 
 the object of the amendment was to cheat them out of their pay, and to violate 
 the plighted faith of the Government. Even Fernando Wood voted against this 
 mean attempt at repudiation; but it met the approbation of Mr. Pendleton. 
 
 January 18, 1864, Mr. Smith, of Kentucky, submitted a preamble and reso- 
 lution, as follows: 
 
 Whereas a most desperate, wicked and bloody rebellion exists within the jurisdiction of the 
 United States, and the safety and security of personal and national liberty depend upon its absolute 
 and utter extinction — therefore, 
 
 .ffe«o/yerf, Ttiit it is the political, civil, moral and sacred duty of the people to meet it, fi^ht it, 
 crush it, and forever destroy it. 
 
 Mr. James C. Allen moved to lay the preamble and resolution on the table, 
 but it failed, though Mr. Pendleton voted with him — ^yeas 26, nays 102. 
 
 The resolution was then adopted — yeas 112, nays 16; Mr. Pendleton voting 
 in the negative, with Wood, Voorhees, James C. Allen, Long, Harris of Mary- 
 land, Ancona, and other Copperheads. 
 
6 
 
 February 15, 1864, Mr. Arnold submitted the following resolution : 
 
 Resolved, That the Constitution should be so amendei.l as to abolish slavery in the United States 
 wherever it now exists, and to prohibit its existence in any part thereof forever. 
 
 Mr. Pendleton in the negative. 
 
 February 29, 1864. Mr. Sclienck submitted the following resolutions : 
 
 Resolved, That the present v?ar which this Government is carrying on against armed insurrection- 
 ists anrJ others banded together under the name of *' Southern Confederacy," was brought on by a 
 wicked and wholly uiijiisti6able rebellion, and all those engaged in, or aiding, or encouraging it 
 are public enemies, and should be treated as such. 
 
 Resolved, That this rebellion shall be effectually put down; and that, to prevent the recurrence 
 of such rebellions in future, the causes which led to this one must he permanently removed. 
 
 Resolved, That in this struggle which is going on for the saving of our country and free govern- 
 ment, there is no middle ground on which any good citizen or true patriot can stand; neutrality, 
 or indifference, or anything short of a hearty support of the Government, being a crime where the 
 question is between loyalty and treason. 
 
 The first resolution was agreed to without a count. On the second, a divi- 
 sion was called for, and the first part adopted. The latter portion, declaring 
 that " to prevent the recurrence of such rebellions in future, the causes which 
 led to this one must be permanently removed," was voted upon. The yeas 
 were 124, the nays were none. Mr, Pendleton dodged. 
 
 The vote was then taken upon the last resolution, which simply declares that 
 in this struggle there is no neutral ground for an honest man to stand upon, 
 and that every loyal citizen must stand by the Government. It was adopted, 
 yeas 109, nays none. But Mr. Pendleton could not go it. He dodged. 
 Even Cox voted for this and the preceding resolutions, but Mr. Pendleton, 
 more candid and consistent in his adherence to the South, stood aloof. Too 
 proud to vote a sentiment which was abhorrent to him, yet lacking firmness to 
 vote against it, he dodged, while the facile little Cox swallowed the bitter pill. 
 That Mr. Pendleton was present, is apparent from the fact that immediately 
 following the vote he took the floor, and offered a resolution protesting against 
 the arrest and punishment of his friend Vallandigham. 
 
 March 28, 1864, Mr. Stevens introduced a joint resolution submitting two 
 amendments to the Constitution of the United States, to be acted upon by the 
 States. The ptoposed amendments are as follows: 
 
 Article 1. Slavery and involuntary servitude, except for the punishment of crimes, whereof the 
 party shall have been duly convicted, is forever prohibited in the United States and all its Terri- 
 tories. 
 
 Art. 2. So much of article four, section two, as refers to the delivery up of persons held to 
 service or labor escaping into another State, is annulled. 
 
 A motion wns made to lay the proposition on the table, but it was rejected — 
 yeas 45, nays 75. Mr, Pendleton voted to lay on the table; and on May 31, 
 voted against the joint resolution. 
 
 On April 9, a resolution was offered to expel Benjamin G. Harris, a Repre- 
 sentative from the State of Maryland, for uttering the following treasonable 
 language in that body : 
 
 The South asked you to let tbem live in peace. But no, you. said you would bring them info 
 subjection. That is not done yet ; and God Almighty grant that it never may be. I hope that 
 you will never subjugate the South. 
 
 On the vote to expel, the yeas were 84, nays 58, Mr. Pendleton voting in the 
 negative. 
 
 On the 14th of April he gave a similar vote against the censure of his col- 
 league, Mr. Long. 
 
 June 13, 1864, Mr. Pendleton voted against the army appropriation bill, as 
 finally agreed upon by committees of conference of the two Houses. 
 
 On the same day, Mr. Pendleton voted against the repeal of the fugitive slave 
 acts. The vote stood — yeas 90, nays 62. 
 
 June 15,1864, Mr. Pendleton voted au;ainst the joint resolution of the Senate 
 proposing to the States changes of the Constitution so as to prohibit slavery. 
 
 July 7, 1864, he voted against the following: 
 
*' rope of sand ;" but Calhoun never pushed his theory of a compact of sovereign 
 States to quite the extreme Avhich Mr. Pendleton has reached, as we will proceed 
 to show. In the same speech he said : 
 
 Now, sir, -what force of arms can compel a State to do that which she has agreed to do? What 
 force of arms can compel a Slate to refrain from doing that which her State government, supported 
 by the sentiment of her people, is determined to persist in doing? It is provided in the Constitution 
 that the citizens of every Stale shall have all llie privileges and immunities of citizens of the several 
 States. Whrtt force of this Federal Government can compel the observance of that clause, if a State 
 is determined to pass and execute laws wliereby citizens of other States shall not have, within its 
 limits, the same pi'iviioge as its own citizens. 
 
 "Full faith and credit sliall be given in each State to the public acts and judicial proceedings of 
 every other State." How will the Federal Government, by armies and arms, enforce the observance' 
 of that clau^^e in the Constitution, if the judiciary and the executive authorities of a State, supported 
 by the laws, refuse such faith and credit? 
 
 "No State, without the consent of Congress, shall Lay any impost or duties on imports." Suppose 
 a State should pass such a law, and the citizens were willing to execute the law, what army could 
 prevent it? 
 
 "No State, Fhall, without the consent of Congress, enter into any agreement or compact with a 
 foreign Power." I wish to know from gentlemen what number of men it would require to annul 
 such an agreement once made. The General Government is invested with certain powers' necessary 
 to be executed, in order to keep the machinery of the Government in motion. Can any number of 
 troops, or the use of any ai-med force on the part of the States, compel the General Government to 
 execute th(>se powers if the agents appointed for that purpose deliberately, persistently refuse to 
 execute them? Si?; the whole scheme of coercion is impracticable. It is contrary to the genius and 
 spirit ojk the Constitution. 
 
 Mr. Pendleton again says : 
 
 Sir, the enforcement of .^ our laws, within a seceding Stale, in opposition to its will, is coercion 
 of that State, and coercion by armed force is war. These terms, "collecting the revenue," 
 "enforcing the law," "maintaining the Union," captivate onr people. They smack of law and 
 order, to which our people are very much attached. They are not unknown in American history. 
 Our fathers heard them used in the same tone and spirit, and for the same purpose, as we hear 
 tbem now. In 17G8, when the colonies were rejoicing at the repeal of the Stamp Act, Charles 
 Townsend, then a member of Lord Chatham's cabinet, pledged to conciliation and peace, rose in 
 the House of Commons, and declared that it was expedient to collect revenues from America, and 
 that he would himself bring in a bill to accompliiib that result. His declaration was received with 
 tumultuous shouts of applause, &c. 
 
 Mr. Pendleton says fuither : 
 
 My voice to dny is for conciliation; my voice is for compromise; and it is but the echo of tlie 
 voice of my constituents. I beg you, gentlemen, who with me rejiresent the northwest; you who 
 •with me represent the State of Ohio; you who with me represent the City of Cincinnati — I beg you, 
 gentlemen, to hear that voice. If you will not ; if you find conciliation impossible; if your differ- 
 ences are so great that you cannot or will not reconcile them, then, gentlemen, let the seceding States 
 depart in peace; let them establish their government and empire, and work out their destiny according to 
 the tvisdom which God has given them. 
 
 But we resume our extracts from Mr. Pendleton's speech. He continues : 
 
 My colleague (.Mr. Stanton) said the other day that war seemed inevitable. He said the end of 
 that war was di-solution and disunion. If he swl truly, if he judged wi.^ely, in God's name let us 
 leap over the intervening agony of war, and come to the end and conclusion at once. 
 
 If George III had conciliated his colonies, bow much wiser a man would history have proclaimed 
 bim! If, failing to conciliate, he had allowed the separation without the disgrace and defeat of the 
 Revolutionary war, how much wiser a man still would he have been! 
 
 Mr. Stantiin. I would been glad to know of my collengue if he holds that there is any power 
 in any department of this Government to recognize the secession of a State under the Constitution. 
 As to the matter of conciliation and compromise, the people of the seceding States say lliey want 
 none, and will accept none; and, therefore, it is useless to talk of it. I again ask my colleague 
 whether there is any power, under the Constitution, to recognize the secession of a State, and 
 recognize it as a foreign nation. 
 
 Mr. Pendleton. What m.-iy be the constitutional power of this Government to recognize the 
 secebsiou of a State, I decline to discuss at present. But this I say, if we should become engaged 
 in war with a foreign enemy, and a portion of our territory should be captured and reduced to pos- 
 session by the enemy, and we should be obliged to make a treaty of peace on the basis of retaining 
 ■what each party had acquired — uti possidetis — ncknowledging the sovereignty of that territory to 
 have passed away from us, certainly the Federal Government would have the power to conform to 
 our restricted limirs, and to confine its jurisdiction to our admitted boundaries. If war be dismem- 
 berment, as my colleague declares, has not the Federal Government as much power to treat that 
 question now as at the end of a war? Will a conflict of arms confer constitutional power upon the 
 Federal Government ? 
 
 With this, as a part only of a long record of a similar character, we present to 
 the American people this accusation of a man who now asks their suffrages to 
 exult him to the second position in their gift. 
 
 Note— The sbove record has been carefully made up from Ihe Journal of the Hou^e of Representatives and the Congressional ^' 
 wliieli is the official organ of Congress; and everj statement made in the pamphlet can be fully vcrilied by a reference to them. 
 
Wherens the organized treason having its head-quarters at Richmond, exists in defiant violation 
 of the national Constitution, and has no claim to be treated otherwise than as an outlaw; and 
 whereas the Richmond combination of conspirators and traitors can have no rightful authority over 
 the people of any portion of the national Union, and no warrant for assuming control of the political 
 destiny of the people of any State or section of this Union, and no apology but that of conspiracy 
 and treason for any assumption of authority whatever: Therefore, 
 
 Resolved, That any proposition to negotiate with the rebel leaders at Richmond (sometimes called 
 "the authorities at Richmond,") for a restoration of loyalty and order in those portions of the Re- 
 public which have been disorganized by the rebellion is, in effect, a proposition to recognize the 
 ring-leaders of the rebellion as entitled to represent and bind the loyal citizens of the United States 
 whom they oppress, and to give countenance and support to the pretensions of conspiracy and 
 treason ; and therefore every such proposition should be rejected without hesitation and delay. 
 
 March 3, 1864. — He voted against the Senate resolutions, against foreign 
 
 intervention in the existing rebellion, of which resolutions the following is one: 
 
 Resolved, That the United States are now grappling with an unprovoked and wicked rebellion, 
 which is seeking the destruction of the Republic that it may build a new Power, whose corner- 
 stone, according to the confession of its chiefs, shall be slavery; that for the suppression of this 
 rebellion, and thus to save the Republic and to prevent the establishment of such a Power, the 
 National Government is now employing armies and fleets, in full faith that through tliese efforts all 
 the purposes of conspirators and rebels will be crushed ; that while engaged in this struggle, on 
 which so much depends, any proposition from a foreign Power, whatever form it may take, having 
 for its object the arrest of these efforts, is, just in proportion to its influence, an encouragement to 
 the rebellion and to its declared pretensions, and, on this account, is calculated to prolong and 
 imbitter the conflict, to cause increased expenditure of blood and treasure, and to postpone the 
 much desired day of peace ; that, with these convictions, and not doubting that every suct^propo- 
 sitiou, ^though made with good intent, is injurious to the national interests. Congress will be 
 obliged to look upon any further attempt in the same direction as an unfriendly act, which it earn- 
 estly deprecates, to the end that nothing may occur abroad to strengthen the rebellion or to weaken. 
 those relations of good will with foreign Powers which the United States are happy to cultiva:e. 
 
 January 29, 1862, he voted against the bill to authorize the President of the 
 United States, in certain cases, to take possession of railroads and telegraph 
 lines, in order more effectually to carry on the war against the rebels. 
 
 December 28, 1862, he voted for the postponement of the bill making appro- 
 priations for the support of the army for the year ending 80th June, 1861, and 
 on the same day dodged the vote on the passage of the bill. 
 
 He opposed the passage of the following resolution : 
 
 Strike out all after the word ^^ Resolved," and insert: " That this House approve of the constant, 
 statesmanlike, and humane efforts of the Administration to secure an exchange of our prisoners now in 
 the hands of the rebels, and that it is hereby recommended that such efforts be continued to secure an 
 exchange of all our poisoners now in southern prisons." 
 
 And by more than a hundred votes of like character has endeavored to 
 hinder the Government in the suppression of the rebellion. 
 
 HIS SPEECHES. 
 
 He says in a speech in the House of Representatives, January 18, 1861 : 
 To-day, sir, four States of the Union have, as far as their power extends, seceded from it. Four 
 States, as far as they are able, have annulled the grants of power made to the Federal Govern- 
 ment ; they have resumed the powers delegated by the Constitution ; they have canceled, as far as 
 they could, every limitation upon the full exercise of all their sovereign rights ; they do not claim 
 our protection ; they ask no benefit from our laws ; they seek none of the advantages of the con- 
 federation. On the other hand, they renounce their allegiance; they repudiate our authority over 
 them ; and they assert that they have assumed, some of them that they have resumed their position 
 among the family of sovereignties among the nations. 
 
 Sir, I deal in no harsh epithets. I will denounce no State, no body of men. I will not pause 
 to inquire whether they have done all this legally or wisclj', or upon sufficient causes. They have 
 done it, and I recognize the fact. They have done it with a unanimity of sentiment, with a coinci- 
 dence of opinion among the people, which is witiiout parallel in the history of revolutions ; and the 
 simple question presented to us to-day is this: whether, throughout the limits of those States, 
 which have thus formally, thus orderly, thus by the enactments of representative bodies of highest 
 capacity known to the civilized nations — conventions duly authorized and properly elected to con- 
 sider this very question — have declared themselves iudependent of us, we are prepared, by force of 
 arms, to maintain our supremacy and enforce our laws ? 
 
 Next Ave have Mr. Pendleton's theory of a Government with no power to 
 enforce the laws. He recites the obligations of the Constitution in order to 
 show that they are utterly without sanction, and that they must always remain 
 null and void when resistance is made to them. Mr. Webster was wont to say 
 -^f Mr. Calhoun's constitutional theories, that they made of the Government a 
 
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 
 
 l.llllllllllllllllllll 
 
 011 895 711 8 ^