1 1 '•iiil'.H'^lUV'filiiiiUl'Ay.' ^.,l;:;:H;:•^;l;;:;.:;;^. V £^ 2'1 iMW. C-OPHRIGHT DSPOSm COLLEGE TEACHING STUDIES IN METHODS OF TEACHING IN THE COLLEGE Edited by PAUL KLAPPER, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Education The College of the City of New York with an Introduction by NICHOLAS MURRAY BUTLER, LL.D. President of Columbia University Yonkers-on-Hudson, New York WORLD BOOK COMPANY 1920 WORLD BOOK COMPANY ^ THE HOUSE OF APPLIED KNOWLEDGE ^^ Established, 1905, by Caspar W. Hodgson Op / YONKERS-ON-HUDSON, NeW YoRK VN^ 2126 Prairie Avenue, Chicago \ A treasure of wisdom is stored in the col- leges of the land. The teachers are the custodians of knowledge that makes life free and progressive. This book aims to make the college teacher effective in hand- ing down this heritage of knowledge, rich and vital, that will develop in youth the power of right thinking and the courage of right living. Thus College Teaching carries out the ideal of service as ex- pressed in the motto of the World Book Company, " Books that Apply the World's Knowledge to the World's Needs " APk -3 1920 Copyright, 1920', by World Book Company Copyright in Great Britain All rights reserved ©CI.A566347 71 r PREFACE THE student of general problems of education or of elementary education finds an extensive literature of varying worth. In the last decade our secondary schools have undergone radical reorganization and have assumed new functions. A rich literature on every phase of the high school is rapidly developing to keep pace with the needs and the progress of secondary education. The litera- ture on college education in general and college pedagogy in particular is surprisingly undeveloped. This dearth is not caused by the absence of problem, for indeed there is room for much improvement in the organization, the ad- ministration, and the pedagogy of the college. Investiga- tors of these problems have been considerably discouraged by the facts they have gathered. This volume is conceived in the hope of stimulating an interest in the quality of college teaching and initiating a scientific study of college pedagogy. The field is almost virgin, and the need for constructive programs is acute. We therefore ask for our effort the indulgence that is usually accorded a pioneer. In this age of specialization of study it is evident that no college teacher, however wide his experience and ex- tensive his education, can speak with authority on the teaching of all the subjects in the college curriculum, or even of all the major ones. For this reason this volume is the product of a cooperating authorship. The editor devotes himself to the study of general methods of teaching that apply to almost all subjects and to most teaching situa- tions. In addition, he coordinates the work of the other contributors. He realizes that there exists among college professors an active hostility to the study of pedagogy. The professors feel that one who knows his subject can teach it. The contributors have been purposely selected in order to dispel this hostility. They are, one and all, men of undisputed scholarship who have realized the need of a mode of presentation that will make their knowledge alive. iii iv Preface Books of multiple authorship often possess too wide a diversity of viewpoints. The reader comes away with no underlying thought and no controlling principles. To overcome this defect, so common in books of this type, a tentative outline was formulated, setting forth a desirable mode of treating, in the confines of one chapter, the teach- ing of any subject in the college curriculum. This outline was submitted to all contributors for critical analysis and constructive criticism. The original plan was later modi- fied in accordance with the suggestions of the contributors. This final outline, which follows, was then sent to the con- tributors with the full understanding that each writer was free to make such modifications as his specialty demanded and his judgment dictated. This outline is followed in most of the chapters and gives the book that unifying ele- ment necessary in any book and vital in a work of so large a cooperating authorship. The editor begs to acknowledge his indebtedness to the many contributors who have given generously of their time and their labor with no hope of compensation beyond the ultimate appreciation of those college teachers who are eager to learn from the experience of others so that they may the better serve their students. TENTATIVE OUTLINE FOR THE TEACHING OF IN THE COLLEGE L Aim of Subject X in the College Curriculum: Is it taught for disciplinary values? What are they? Is it taught for cultural reasons? Is it taught to give necessary information? Is it taught to prepare for professional studies? Is the aim single or eclectic? Do the aims vary for different groups of students? Does this apply to all the courses in your specialty? How does the aim govern the methods of teaching? II. Place of the Subject in the College Curriculum: In what year or years should it be taught? What part of the college course^ in terms of time or cred- its — should be allotted to it? Preface v What is the practice in other colleges? What course or courses in this subject should be part of the general curriculum or be prescribed for students in art, in science, in modern languages, or in the preprofessional or professional groups? III. Organization of the Subject in the College Course: Desired sequence of courses in this subject. What is the basis of this sequence? Gradation of successive difficulties or logical sequence of facts? Should these courses be elective or prescribed? All pre- scribed? For all groups of students? In what years should the elective work be offered? IV. Discussion of Methods of Teaching this Subject: Place and relative worth of lecture method, laboratory work, recitations, research, case method, field work, assignment from a single text or reference reading, etc. Discussion of such problems as the following: Shall the first course in chemistry be a general and extensive course summing up the scope of chemistry, its function in organic and inorganic nature, with no laboratory work other than the experimentation by the instructor? Should students in the social sciences study the subject de- ductively from a book or should the book be postponed and the instructor present a series of problems from the social life of the student so that the analysis of these may lead the student to formulate many of the generalizations that are given early in a textbook course? Should college mathematics be presented as a series of sub- jects, e.g., algebra (advanced), solid geometry, trigonom- etry, analytical geometry, calculus, etc.? Would it be better to present the subject as a single and unified whole in two or three semesters? Should a student study his mathematics as it is developed in his book, — viz., as an intellectual product of a matured mind familiar with the subject, — or should the subject grow gradually in a more or less unorganized form from a series of mechanical, engineering, building, nautical, sur- veying, and structural problems that can be found in the life and environment of the student? V. Moot Questions in the Teaching of this Subject. VI. How judge whether the subject has been of worth to the stu- dent? How test whether the aims of this subject have been realized? How test how much the student has carried away? What means, methods, and indices exist aside from the traditional examination ? vi Preface VII. Bibliography on the Pedagogy of this Subject as Far as It Ap- plies to College Teaching. The aim of the bibliography should be to give worth-while contributions that present elaborations of what is here presented or points of view and modes of procedure that differ from those here set forth. Paul Klapper The College of the City of New York CONTENTS _ PAGE Introduction xiii By Nicholas Murray Butler, Ph.D., LL.D. President of Columbia University. Author of The Meaning of Education, True and False Democracy, etc. Editor of Educational Review PART ONE — THE INTRODUCTORY STUDIES CHAPTER I History and Present Tendencies of the American College 3 By Stephen Pierce Duggan, Ph.D. Professor of Education, The College of the City of New York. Author of A Student's History of Education II Professional Training for College Teaching 31 By Sidney E. Mezes, Ph.D., LL.D. President of The College of the City of New York. Formerly President of University of Texas. Author of Ethics, Descriptive and Explanatory III General Principles of College Teaching 43 By Paul Klapper, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Education, The College of the City of New York. Author of Principles of Educational Practice, The Teaching of English, etc. PART TWO — THE SCIENCES IV The Teaching of Biology 85 By T. W. Galloway, Ph.D., Litt.D. Professor of Zoology, Beloit College. Author of Textbook of Zoology, Biology of Sex for Parents and Teach- ers, Use of Motives in Moral Education, etc. V The Teaching of Chemistry . . . . 110 By Louis Kahlenberg, Ph.D. Director of the Course in Chemistry and Professor of Chemistry, University of Wisconsin. Author of Outlines of Chemistry, Laboratory Exercises in Chemistry, Chemistry Analysis, Chemistry and Its Relation to Daily Life, etc. VI The Teaching of Physics 126 By Harvey B. Lemon, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Physics, University of Chicago vii viii Contents CHAPTER PAGE VII The Teaching of Geology 142 By T. C. Chamberlin, Ph.D., LL.D., Sc.D. Pro- fessor and Head of Department of Geology and Director of Walker Museum, University of Chicago. Author of Geology of Wisconsin, The Origin of the Earth. Editor of The Journal of Geology VIII The Teaching of Mathematics . . . 161 By G. A. Miller, Ph.D. Professor of Mathematics, University of Illinois. Author of Determinants, Mathematical Monographs (co-author). Theory and Applications of Groups of Finite Order (co-author), ' Historical Introduction to the Mathematical Lit- erature, etc. Co-editor of American Year Book and Encyclopedic des Sciences Mathematiques IX Physical Education in the College . . 183 By Thomas A. Storey, M.D., Ph.D. Professor of Hygiene, The College of the City of New York. State Inspector of Physical Training, New York. Secretary-General, Fourth International Congress of School Hygiene, .Buffalo, 1913. Executive-Secre- tary, United States Interdepartmental Social Hygiene Board. Author of various contributions to standard works on physiology, hygiene, and physical training PART THREE — THE SOCIAL SCIENCES X The Teaching of Economics .... 217 By Frank A. Fetter, Ph.D., LL.D, Professor of Political Economy, Princeton University. Author of Economic Principles and Modern Economic Problems XI The Teaching of Sociology .... 241 Arthur J. Todd, Ph.D. Professor of Sociology and Director of the Training Course for Social and Civic Work, University of Minnesota. Author of The Primitive Family as an Educational Factor, Theories of Social Progress XII The Teaching of History A. American History 256 By Henry W. Elson, A.M., Litt.D. President of Thiel College. Formerly Professor of History, Ohio University. Author of History of the United States, The Story of the Old World (with Cornelia E. MacMullan), etc. Contents ix CHAPTER PAGE B. Modern European History . . . . 263 By Edward Krehbiel, Ph.D. Professor of Modern European History, Leland Stanford University. Author of The Interdict, Nationalism, War and Society XIII The Teaching of Poutical Science . . 279 By Charles Grove Haines, Ph.D. Professor of Government, University of Texas. Author of Con- flict over Judicial Powers in the United States prior to 1870, The American Doctrine of Judicial Supremacy, The Teaching of Government (Report of Committee on Instruction, Political Science Asso- ciation) XIV The Teaching of Philosophy . . . . 302 By Frank Thilly, Ph.D., LL.D. Professor of Phi- losophy, Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences, Cornell University. Author of Introduction to Ethics, History of Philosophy XV The Teaching of Ethics 320 By Henry Neumann, Ph.D. Leader of the Brook- lyn Society for Ethical Culture. Formerly of the Department of Education, The College of the City of New York. Author of Moral Values in Sec- ondary Education XVI The Teaching of Psychology .... 334 By Robert S. Woodworth, Ph.D. Professor of Psychology, Columbia University. Author of Dyna- mic Psychology, he Mouvement, Care of the Body, Elements of Physiological Psychology (with George Trumbull Ladd) XVII The Teaching of Education A. Teaching the History of Education . 347 By Herman H. Horne, Ph.D. (Harvard). Pro- fessor of the History of Education and the History of Philosophy, New York University. Author of The 'Philosophy of Education, The Psychological Principles of Education, Free Will and Human- Responsibility, etc. B. Teaching Educational Theory . , . 359 By Frederick E. Bolton, Ph.D. Dean of the Col- lege of Education, University of Washington. Au- thor of Principles of Education, The Secondary School System of Germany X Contents PART FOUR — THE LANGUAGES AND LITERATURES CHAPTER PAGE XVIII The Teaching of English Literature . 379 By Caleb T. Winchester, L.H.D. Professor of English Literature, Wesleyan University. Author of Some Principles of Literary Criticism, A Group of English Essayists, William Wordsworth: How to -Know Him, etc. XIX The Teaching of English Composition . 389 By Henry Seidel Canby, Ph.D. Adviser in Liter- ary Composition, Yale University. Author of The Short Story in English, College Sons and College Fathers, etc. XX The Teaching of the Classics .... 404 By William K. Prentice, Ph.D. Professor of Greek, Princeton University. Author of Greek and Latin Inscriptions in Syria XXI The Teaching of the Romance Lan- guages 424 By William A. Nitze, Ph.D. Professor and Head of Department of Romance Languages, University of Chicago. Author of The Grail Romance, Glas- tonbury and the Holy Grail, Handbook of French Phonetics, etc. Contributor to New International Encyclopedia XXII The Teaching of German 440 By E. Prokosch, Ph.D. Late Professor of Ger- manic Languages, University of Texas. Author of Teaching of German in Secondary Schools, Phonetic Lessons in German, Sounds and History of the German Language, etc. PART FIVE — THE ARTS XXIII The Teaching of Music 457 By Edward Dickinson, Litt.D. Professor of His- tory and Criticism of Music, Oberlin College. Au- thor of Music in the History of the Western Church, The Study of the History of Music, The Education of a Music Lover, Music and the Higher Education Contents XI CHAPTER PAGE XXIV The Teaching of Art 475 By Holmes Smith, A.M. Professor of Drawing and the History of Art, Washington University. Author of various articles in magazines on art topics PART SIX — VOCATIONAL SUBJECTS XXV The Teaching of Engineering Subjects . 501 By Ira O. Baker, C.E., D. Eng'g. Professor of Civil Engineering, University of Illinois. Author of Treatise on Masonry Construction, Treatise on Roads and Pavements XXVI The Teaching of Mechanical Drawing . 525 By James D. Phillips, B.S. Asisstant Dean and Professor of Drawing, College of Engineering, Uni- versity of Wisconsin. Author of Elements of De- scriptive Geometry (with A. V. Millar) , Mechanical Drawing for Secondary Schools (with F. 0. Craw- - shaw), Mechanical Drawing for Colleges and Uni- versities (with H. D. Orth) and Herbert D. Orth, B.S. Assistant Professor of Mechanical Drawing and Descriptive Geometry, University of Wisconsin. Author of Mechanical Drawing for Colleges and Universities (with J. D. Phillips) XXVII XXVIII The Teaching of Journalism . . . . By Talcott Williams, A.M., LL.D., Lttt.D. Di- rector, School of Journalism, Columbia University 533 Index . Business Education 555 By Frederick B. Robinson, Ph.D. Professor of Economics and Dean of the School of Business and Civic Administration, College of the City of New York ■ 577 INTRODUCTION IT is characteristic of the American people to have pro- found faith in the power of education. Since Colonial days the American college has played a large part in American life and has trained an overwhelming propor- tion of the leaders of American opinion. There was a time when the American college was a relatively simple institu- tion of a uniform type, but that time has passed. The term " college " is now used in a variety of significations, a number of which are very new and very modern indeed. Some of these uses of the term are quite indefensible, as when one speaks of a college of engineering, or of law, or of medicine, or of journalism, or of architecture. Such use of the word merely confuses and makes impossible clear thinking as to educational institutions and educational aims. The term " college " can be properly used only of an institution which offers training in the liberal arts and sciences to youth who have completed a standard secondary school course of study. The purpose of college teaching is to lay the foundation for intelligent and effective special- ization later on, to open the mind to new interpretations and new understandings both of man and of nature, and to give instruction in those standards of judgment and ap- preciation, the possession and application of which are the marks of the truly educated and cultivated man. The size of a college is a matter of small importance, except that under modern conditions a large college and one in im- mediate contact with the life of a university is almost cer- tain to command larger intellectual resources than is an institution of a different type. The important thing about a college is its spirit, its clearness of aim, its steadiness of purpose, and the opportunity which it affords for direct personal contact between teacher and student. Given these, the question of size is unimportant. There was a time when it was felt, probably correctly, that a satisfactory college training could be had by requir- xiii xiv Introduction ing all students to follow a single prescribed course of study. At that time, college students were drawn almost exclusively from families and homes of a single type or kind. Their purposes in after-life were similar, and their range of intellectual sympathy, while intense, was rather narrow. The last fifty years have changed all this. Col- lege students are now drawn from families and homes of every conceivable type and kind. Their purposes in after- life are very different, while new subjects of study have been multiplied many fold. The old and useful tradition of Latin, Greek, and mathematics, together with a little history and literature, as the chief elements in a college course of study, had to give way when first the natural sciences, and then the social sciences, claimed attention and when even these older subjects of study were them- selves subdivided into many parts. These changes forced a change in the old-fashioned pro- gram of college study, and led to the various substitutes for it that now exist. Whether a college prefers the elective system of study, or the group system, or some other method of combining instruction that is regarded as fundamental with other instruction that is regarded as less so, the fact is that all these are simply different kinds of attempt to meet a new condition which is the natural result of intel- lectual and economic changes. Just now the college is in a state of transition. It is not at all clear precisely what its status will be a generation hence, or how far present tendencies may continue to increase, or how far they may be counteracted bv a swing of the pendulum in the op- posite direction. Therefore this is a time to describe rather than to dogmatize, and it is description which is the char- acteristic mark of the important series of papers which constitute the several chapters in the present volume. A careful reading of these papers is commended not only to the great army of college teachers and college students, but to that still greater army of those who, whether as alumni or as parents or as citizens, are deeply concerned with the preservation of the influence and character of the Introduction xv American college for its effect upon our national standards of thought and action. American colleges are of two distinct types, and it may be that the future has in store a different position for each type. The true distinction between colleges is according as they are separate or are incorporated in a university system, and not at all as to whether they are large or small. A separate college, such as Amherst or Beloit or Grinnell or Pomona, has its own peculiar problems of support and administration. The university college, on the other hand, such as Columbia or Harvard or Chicago or the college of any state university, has quite different problems of sup- port and of administration. It is not unlikely that the dis- tinction between these two types of college will become more sharply marked as years go by, and that eventually they will appear to be two distinct institutions rather than two types of one and the same institution. Meanwhile, we have to deal with the college as it is, in all its varied forms, but characteristically American whatever its form. The American college has little or no resemblance to the English Public School or to the French Lycee or to the German Gymnasium. It is something more than any one of these, and at the same time something less. It differs from them all very much as the conditions of American life differ from those of English or of French or of German life. The college may or may not involve residence, but when it does involve residence, it is at its best. It is then that the largest amount of carefully ordered and stimulating influence can be brought to bear upon the daily life of growing and expanding youth, and it is then and only then, that youth can get the inestimable benefits which follow from daily and hourly contact with others of like age, like tastes, like habits, and like purposes. Indeed, it has often been said that the college gives more through its opportunities which attach to residence, than through its opportunities which attach to instruction. Almost every conceivable problem that can arise in col- lege life and college work, is discussed in the following xvi Introduction pages. It is now coming to be understood that the health of the college student is as much a matter of concern as his instruction, and that a college is not doing its full duty by those who seek its doors, when it merely provides libraries, laboratories, and skillful teachers. It must also provide for such conditions of residence, of food, of exercise, and of frequent medical examination and inspection, as shall protect and preserve the health of those who come to take advantage of its instruction. There is one other point which should not be overlooked, and that is the literally immense influence exerted in America by that solidarity of college sentiment and college opinion which is kept alive by organizations of former col- lege students scattered throughout the land. This, again, is a peculiarly American development, and it serves to unite the college and public sentiment much more closely than any formal tie could possibly do. Indeed, it illustrates how completely the American people claim the college as their own. The man or woman who has once been a col- lege student never ceases to be a member of that particular college or to labor to extend its influence and to increase its usefulness. Every reader of this volume should approach It in a spirit of sympathetic understanding of American higher education, and of the college as the oldest instrument of that higher education and still one of the chief elements in it. Nicholas Murray Butler Columbia University PART ONE The Introductory Studies CHAPTER I History and Present Tendencies of the American College Stephen P. Duggan II Professional Training for College Teaching Sidney E. Mezes III General Principles of College Teaching Paul Klapper I HISTORY AND PRESENT TENDENCIES OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE T 1. THE COLONIAL PERIOD HE American colonies were founded chiefly by English- ^^® ?^^ doin.iji.£Liic6 men who came to America for a variety of reasons, of the Some of these were economic and political, but the most ^^^ifious r •> motive important of their reasons was the desire to practice their religious convictions with greater freedom than was per- mitted at home. Apart from the state religion, however, all the colonists were animated by a love for English institu- tions which they transplanted to the New World, and among these institutions were the grammar school and the college. Wherever the Reformation had been chiefly a religious rather than a political and ecclesiastical movement, the in- terest in education and the effect upon it were direct and immediate. This was true where Calvinism prevailed, as in the Netherlands, Scotland, and among the Puritans in Eng- land. Hence it is natural to find that the first effective movements in America toward the establishment of educa- tional institutions, both elementary and higher, should have taken place in New England. A large proportion of university graduates were included among the settlers of the Massachusetts Bay Colony. They were chiefly graduates of Cambridge, which had always been religiously more tolerant than Oxford, and especially of Emmanuel College, which was the stronghold of Puritanism at Cambridge. It was natural that these men, leaders in the aff"airs of the colony, should want to establish a New Cambridge University, but it is astonishing that they were able to do so as early as 1636, only six years after the founding of this colony. Two years later the college was named after John Harvard, a clergyman and a graduate of Emmanuel, who upon his death bequeathed half his estate 3 4 College Teaching and all his fine library of three hundred volumes to the college. The religious motive predominated in the found- ing of Harvard, for though the colonists longed " to advance learning and perpetuate it to posterity," they were actuated chiefly by dread " to leave an illiterate ministry to. the churches, when our present Ministers shall lie in the Dust." Harvard remained the sole instrument in the colonies for that purpose for more than half a century. In 1693 the College of William and Mary was founded in Virginia, with the most generous endowment of any pre-Revolutionary col- lege, generous because of the help received from the mother country. It was the child of the Church of England, and its president and its professors had to subscribe to the Thirty- nine Articles. Subscription to a religious creed was also demanded of the president and tutors of the third American college, founded in 1701. This Collegiate Institute, as it was called, moved from place to place for more than a dec- ade, but finally it settled permanently in New Haven in 1717. It afterward received the name of Yale College in honor of Elihu Yale, who had given it generous assistance. As a result of the founding of these three institutions, the New England and the Southern colonies had their need for ministers fairly well supplied, but this was not yet true of the Middle colonies. However, the Presbyterians had be- come particularly strong in the Middle colonies, and their religious zeal resulted in the establishment of the College of New Jersey, now Princeton University, in 1746. A few years later Benjamin Franklin advanced for the college a new raison d'etre. In 1749 he published a pam- phlet entitled " Proposals Relating to the Education of Youth in Pennsylvania," in which he advocated the estab- lishment of an academy whose purpose was not the training of ministers but the secular one of developing the practical virtue necessary in the opening up of a new country. The Academy was opened in 1751, and the charter, granted in 1755, designated the institution as " The College, Academy, and Charitable School of Philadelphia." Though the extremely modern organization and curriculum suggested History and Present Tendencies by Franklin were not realized, the institution, which was afterward called " The University of Pennsylvania," offered the most liberal curriculum of any college in the colonies up to the Revolution. The human motive was uppermost also in the establish- ment of King's College in 1754. The colonial assembly desired its establishment to enhance the welfare and reputa- tion of the colony, and the only connection between the col- lege and the Church of England lay in the requirement that the president should be a communicant of that church and that the morning and evening service of the college should be performed out of the liturgy of- that church. But the re- ligious motive again comes to the fore in the establishment of Brown University at Providence, Rhode Island, in 1764, primarily to train ministers for the Baptist churches; of Queens, afterwards named Rutgers, in 1766, to provide min- isters for the Dutch Reformed churches ; and of Dartmouth, in 1769, from which it was hoped at first that the evan- gelization of the Indians would proceed. These colonial colleges in their histories bear a great re- Character semblance to one another. They were almost all born in coion^iai poverty and led a desperate financial existence for many college years. In some cases survival was possible only as the result of the untiring self-sacrifice of some great personality like Eleazar Wheelock, the first president of Dartmouth; in all cases, of the devotion of teachers and officers. Their beginnings were all small; in some cases the president was the only member of the instructing staff and taught all the subjects of the curriculum. The students were few in num- ber, the equipment was simple, the buildings usually con- sisting of a house for the president, in which he often heard recitations, a dormitory for the students, and a col- lege hall. Libraries, laboratories, and recreational facili- ties were usually conspicuous by their absence. In fact, as the curriculum consisted almost exclusively of philosophy, Greek, Latin, rhetoric, and a little mathematics, there was no great need of much equipment. The classics were taught by the intensive grammatical method; in philosophy there was 6 College Teaching a great deal of dialectical disputation; rhetoric was studied as an aid to oratory; mathematics included only arithmetic and geometry. The aim of instruction was, not to give a wide acquaintance with many fields of knowledge for cul- tural and appreciative purposes, but rather to develop power through intensive exercise upon a restricted curriculum. But the value of the materials utilized to produce power which would function in oratory, debate, and diplomacy is splendidly illustrated in the decades before the Revolution. The contest between the colonies and the mother country was essentially a rational contest in which questions of con- stitutional law and, indeed, of the fundamental principles of civil and political existence were debated. Splendidly did the leaders of public opinion in the colonies, almost every one of whom was a graduate of a colonial college, defend the cause of the colonists in pamphlet and debate. And when debate was followed by war, twBnty-five per cent of the twenty-five hundred graduates of the colonial colleges were found in the military service of their country. At the close of the struggle for independence, it was again upon the shoulders of the men who had gained vision and char- acter in the colonial colleges that the burden fell of organ- izing the mutually suspicious and antagonistic colonies into one nation. Space will not permit even of the enumeration of the great leaders who graduated from all the colonial colleges, but an idea of the service rendered by those insti- tutions to the new nation may be obtained by mentioning the names of a few statesmen who received their instruction in one of the least of them, William and Mary. In its class- rooms were taught Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Harrison, Edmund Randolph, James Monroe, and John Marshall. 2. THE NATIONAL ERA Trench French influence upon American political and intellectual life had become quite pronounced as the result of the con- tact between the leaders of the two peoples during and after the Revolution. That influence was reflected in the colleges. J History and Present Tendencies 7 Instruction in the French language was offered in several of the colleges before the close of the eighteenth century, and a chair of French was established at Columbia as early as 1779 and at William and Mary in 1793. The secularizing influence of the French united also with the democratizing influence of the Revolution in diminishing the influence of the church upon the colleges and emphasizing the influence of the State and especially the relations between college and people. Of the fourteen colleges founded between 1776 and 1800, the majority were established upon a non-sectarian basis. These included institutions of a private nature like Washington and Lee, Bowdoin, and Union, as well as insti- tutions closely related to the state governments like the Uni- versities of North Carolina and of Vermont. There can hardly be any doubt that the French system of centralized administration in civil affairs influenced the establishment of the University of the State of New York. The University of the State of New York is not a local institution, but a body of nine regents elected by the legislature to control the administration of education throughout the State of New York. Though organized by Alexander Hamilton, it was in all probability much influenced by John Jay, who re- turned from France in 1784. But the most potent factor in the spread of French influence in the early history of our country was Thomas Jefferson. While Jefferson was Amer- ican minister to France, he studied the French system of edu- cation and embodied ideas taken from it in the organization of the University of Virginia. This occupied much of his attention during the last two decades of his life. The Uni- versity was to be entirely non-sectarian and had for its pur- pose (1) to form statesmen, legislators, and judges for the commonwealth; (2) to expand the principles and structure of government, the laws which regulate the intercourse of states, and a sound spirit of legislation; (3) to harmonize and promote the interests of all forms of industry, chiefly by well-informed views of political economy; (4) to de- velop the reasoning faculties of youth and to broaden their minds and develop their character; (5) to enlighten them 8 College Teaching with knowledge, especially of the physical sciences which will advance the material welfare of the people. These progressive views of what the college should aim to do were associated with equally advanced views of college ad- ministration, such as the elective system and the impor- tation of professors from abroad. The remarkable vision, constructive imagination, courage, and faith of Jefferson in his break with what was traditional and authoritative in education has been justified by the fine career of the uni- versity which he founded. The state ^11 the colleges that were established before the Revolu- universities . c ^ ^ i n i system tion, and most oi those between the Revolution and the year 1800, had received direct assistance from the colonial or state government either in grants of land, money, the pro- ceeds of lotteries, or special taxes. Most of them, however, were dependent upon private foundations and controlled by denominational bodies. The secularizing influence from France, the growing interest in civic and political aff'airs, and the democratic spirit resulting from the Revolution combined to develop a distrust of the colleges as they were organized and a desire to bring them under the control of the state. This was apparent in 1779, when the legislature of Pennsylvania withdrew the charter of the college of Phil- adelphia and created a new corporation to be known as " The Trustees of the University of the State of Pennsyl- vania "; it was shown in 1787 when Columbia College was granted a new charter by the state legislature, under which the board of trustees were all drawn from the Board of Regents of the State; it was made most evident in 1816 when the legislature of New Hampshire transformed Dart- mouth College into a university without the consent of the board of trustees and empowered the governor and council to appoint a Board of Overseers. In the celebrated Dart- mouth College case, 1819, the old board of trustees, when defeated before the Supreme Court of New Hampshire in their suit for the recovery of property which had been seized, carried the case to the Supreme Court of the United States and engaged Daniel Webster as their counsel. The Court History and Present Tendencies 9 declared the act of the New Hampshire legislature in viola- tion of the provision of the Constitution of the United States which reads that " No state shall pass any . . . law impair- ing the obligation of contracts." The decision drew a sharp distinction between public and private corporations, and a necessary inference was that most of the existing institutions for higher education were in the latter class. The result was to strengthen the rising demand for publicly controlled institutions. The Southern and Western states across the Alleghanies that were on the point of framing state consti- tutions made provision for state universities under state control. The intention to provide higher education freely for the people had already received its greatest impetus in an Act of Congress passed shortly after the passage of the Ordi- nance of 1787, providing for the organization of the North- west Territory. By that act two entire townships of public land were reserved to the states to be erected out of the terri- tory, the proceeds of the sale of which were to be devoted to the establishment of a state university. These universities followed swiftly upon the establishment of new states, and the democratic ideal that prevailed is shown in the determi- nation that the state university was to be the crown of the public educational system of the state. This is well illus- trated in the provision of the constitution of Indiana, adopted in the very year of the Dartmouth College decision, 1819, which reads, " It shall be the duty of the General Assembly, as soon as circumstances will permit, to provide by law for a general system of education, ascending in reg- ular gradation from township schools to a state university, wherein tuition shall be gratis and equally open to all." Circumstances did permit in the following year, and the provisions of the bill materialized. The national policy of granting public lands for educational purposes to new states was continued, and one or two townships were devoted in each case to the establishment of a state university. Na- tional assistance to higher education was given on an im- mense scale in 1862, when the Morrill Act was passed pro- 10 College Teaching viding for the grant of 30,000 acres of land for each repre- sentative and senator, to be devoted to the support in each state of a higher institution of learning, in which technical and agricultural branches should be taught. Within twenty years every state in the Union had taken advantage of this splendid endowment, either to found a new state university which would comply with the requirements as regards courses of instruction or to establish an agricultural college as an independent institution, or in connection with some already existing institution. Not only do some of the finest state universities like those of California, Illinois, and Min- nesota owe their origins to the Morrill Act, but others owe to it their real beginnings as institutions of collegiate grade. Up to the passage of the Morrill Act a dozen state universi- ties struggled to maintain themselves with meager revenues and few students. They were trying to do broad aca- demic work, but by no means reached the standards of the strong colleges in the eastern part of the country. The establishment of state-supported and state-controlled universities in the commonwealths organized after the close of the eighteenth century by no means put an end to the es- tablishment of colleges upon religious foundations. De- nominational zeal was very strong in the decades preceding the Civil War, and the church was the center of community life in the newly settled regions. The need to provide an in- telligent ministry and also a higher civilization led to the es- tablishment of many small sectarian colleges in the new states. Despite the fact that practically all of them would today be considered only of secondary grade, they accom- plished a splendid work and provided ideals and standards of intellectual life in a new country whose population was engaged chiefly in supplying the physical needs of life. The response made in the Civil War by the institutions of higher education throughout the United States, whether pri- vately or publicly supported, was a magnificent return for the sacrifices endured in their establishment and mainte- nance. Everywhere throughout the North the colleges were depleted of instructors and students who had entered the History and Present Tendencies 11 ranks, and in the South nearly all the colleges were com- pelled to close their doors. Upon the shoulders of their graduates fell the burden of directing civil and military affairs in state and nation. 3. THE MODERN ERA Were a visitor to Harvard or Columbia in 1860 to revisit it today, the changes he would observe would be startling. The elective system, graduate studies, professional and tech- nical schools, an allied woman's college, and a summer ses- sion are a few of the most noticeable activities incorporated since 1860. It would be impossible to set any date for the beginning of this transformation, so gradual and subtle has it been, but the accession of Dr. Charles W. Eliot to the presidency of Harvard College in 1869 and the establish- ment of Johns Hopkins University in 1876 are definite land- marks. This chapter is a history of the American college, and space will not permit of a detailed description of these ac- tivities but simply of a narration of the way they developed and of the forces which brought them into being. It has already been mentioned that the curriculum of the ^J^^ curric- 1 1 • • f 1 • ulum and average American college at the beginning oi the nmeteenth the eiec- century differed but little from the curriculum followed in *^^® system the middle of the seventeenth. The reason is simple. The curriculum is based upon the biological principle of adap.- tation to environment, and the environment of the average American of 1800 differed but slightly from his ancestor of a century and a half previous. The growth of the curric- ulum follows, slowly it is often true, upon the growth of knowledge. The growth of knowledge during the seven- teenth and eighteenth centuries was slow and insignificant compared to its marvelous growth in the nineteenth cen- tury, particularly in the last half of it. The great discov- eries in science, first in chemistry, then in physics and biol- ogy, resulted in their gradually displacing much of the logic and philosophy which had maintained the prime place 12 College Teaching in the old curriculum. The interest aroused in the French language and literature by our Revolution; in the Spanish by the South American wars of independence; and in the German by the distinguished scholars who studied in the German universities during the middle decades of the nine- teenth century, caused a demand that those languages as well as English have a place in the curriculum. This could be secured only by making them partly alternatives to the classical languages. The Industrial Revolution, based as it was upon the application of science to industry, not only gave an impetus to the establishment of technical schools, but by revolutionizing the production and distribution of wealth pushed into the curriculum the science that deals with wealth, political economy. The growth of cities that followed in the wake of the Industrial Revolution, the con- flicts between the interests of classes, — viz., landowners, capitalists, and laborers, — the rapid decay of feudalism and the spread of political democracy following the French Rev- olution, the expansion of commerce to all corners of the globe and the resulting development of colonialism, all these human interests gave a new meaning to the study of his- tory and politics which caused them to secure a place of great prominence in the curriculum during the last quarter of the nineteenth century. It is perfectly obvious that as the time at the student's disposal remained the same, if he were to pursue even a part of the new subject matter that was gradually admitted into the curriculum, the course of study could no longer remain wholly prescribed and he would have to be granted some freedom of choice. The growth in number of students also produced changes in administration favorable to the introduction of the elective system. In the early history of the American college one instructor taught a single class in all subjects, and it was not until 1776 that the transfer was made at Harvard from the teaching of classes by one instructor to the teaching of each subject by one instructor. With increase in numbers the students were unable to receive in each year instruction by every member of the teaching History and Present Tendencies 13 staff. In spite of the quite obvious advantages of the elec- tive system, it was obstinately resisted by the defenders of the classics and also of orthodox religion and at first made but slow progress. Thomas Jefferson gave it the first great impetus when he made it an essential element in the organ- ization of the University of Virginia in 1825. Francis Wayland, president of Brown University and one of the few college presidents of his day who were educators in the modern sense, made a splendid exposition and defense of it in 1850 in his " Report to the Corporation of Brown Uni- versity on Changes in the System of Collegiate Education." But the elective system waited upon the elevation of Charles W. Eliot to the presidency of Harvard in 1869 for its general realization; in 1872 the senior year at Harvard became wholly elective; in 1879, the" junior year; in 1884, the soph- omore year; and in 1894 the single absolute requirement that remained in the entire college course was English A. The action of Harvard was rapidly imitated to a more or less thorough extent throughout the country. Probably no two colleges administer the elective system in the same way. There has been a considerable revulsion of opinion against unrestricted election of individual sub- jects. In many colleges the subjects of the curriculum were arranged into groups which must be elected in toto. This resulted in the multiplication of bachelor's degrees, each in- dicating the special course — arts, science, philosophy, or literature — which had been followed. At the present time the tendency is to prescribe the -subjects considered essen- tial to a liberal education chiefly in the first two years and to permit election among groups of related courses in the last two. This has maintained the unity that formerly pre- vailed and introduced greater breadth into the curriculum. It has also brought the new bachelor's degrees into disfavor, and today the majority of the best colleges give only the A.B. degree for the regular academic course. Valuable modifications in the elective system are constantly being adopted. One such is the preceptorial system at Princeton and elsewhere, under which the preceptors personally super- 14 College Teaching German in- fluence and graduate study vise the reading and study of a small group of students and can therefore advise them from personal knowledge of their capacity. Another is the system of honor courses adopted at Columbia and elsewhere, whereby a distinction is made between mere " passmen " and students desirous of attain- ing high rank in courses that are carefully organized in se- quence. The introduction of new subjects into the curriculum of the college and the adoption by it of the elective system owe much to German influence upon American education. Though this influence was partly exerted by the study of the German language and literature, it resulted chiefly from the residence of American students at German universities. The first American to be granted the degree of Doctor of Philosophy from a German university was Edward Everett, who received it at Gottingen in 1817. He was followed by George Ticknor, George Bancroft, Henry W. Longfellow, John Lothrop Motley, Frederick Henry Hedge, William Dwight Whitney, Theodore Dwight Woolsey, and a host of scholars who shed luster upon American education and scholarship in the mid-nineteenth century. Most of these men became associated with American colleges in some ca- pacity and had a profound influence upon their ideals, or- ganization, and methods of teaching. They came back de- voted advocates of wide and deep scholarship, of independ- ent research, and of the need of such scholastic tools as libraries and la«boratories. But especially did they give an impetus to the movement in favor of freedom of choice (Lernfreiheit) in studies. Only by the adoption of such a principle could the pronounced tastes or needs of individual students be satisfied. Some slight effort had been made in the first four dec- ades of the nineteenth century by a few of the colleges to conform to the desire of students for further study in some chosen field, but the results were negligible. In 1847 Yale esta'blished a " department of philosophy and the arts for scientific and gr-aduate study leading to the degree of bach- elor of philosophy." The first degree of doctor of philos- History and Present Tendencies 15 ophy was bestowed in 1861, .but a distinct graduate school was not organized until 1872. Harvard announced in the same year the establishment of a graduate department to which only holders of the bachelor's degree would be ad- mitted and in which the degrees of doctor of philosophy and doctor of science would be conferred. The graduate depart- ment was not made a separate school, however, until 1890. The greatest impetus to the establishment of graduate schools in the American universities was made by the estab- lishment of Johns Hopkins University in 1876. Upon its foundation the chief aim was announced to be the develop- ment of instruction in the methods of scientific research. The influence of this institution upon the development of higher education in the United States has been incalculably great. Johns Hopkins was not a transplanted German uni- versity. The unique place of the college in American edu- cation was shown by the fact that graduate schools have followed the lead of Johns Hopkins in building upon the college. Even Clark University at Worcester, founded in 1889 upon a purely graduate basis, established an under- graduate college in 1902. One of the most gratifying features of higher education in the United States during the past quarter century has been the extension of graduate schools to the strong state universities. Research work in them usually began in the school of agriculture, where the intensive study of the sci- ences, particularly chemistry and biology, had such splendid results in improved farming and dairying that legislatures were gradually persuaded to extend the support for research to purely liberal studies. With the growth and development of graduate schools in this country, the practice of going to Europe for advanced specialized study has abated consid- erably. It will probably so continue in the future, partic- ularly with regard to Germany. On the other hand, should the new ideal of international good will become a living reality, education through a wide system of exchange pro- fessors and students may be expected to make its contribu- tion. 16 College Teaching Technical and profes- sional study While the graduate school was built upon the college, the technical school grew up by the side of it or upon an inde- pendent foundation. The first technical school was estab- lished at Troy, New York, in 1824, and was called Rens- selaer Polytechnic Institute, after its founder, Stephen Van Rensselaer. For a score of years no other development of consequence was made, but in 1847 the foundations were made of what have since become the Lawrence Scientific School at Harvard and the Sheffield Scientific School at Yale. The passage of the Morrill Act in 1862 had a quick- ening effect on education in engineering and agriculture. In the decade from 1860 to 1870 some twenty-two techni- cal institutions were founded, most of them by the aid of the land grants. The most important of them is the Massachu- setts Institute of Technology, where instruction was first given in 1865 and which has exerted by far the greatest influ- ence upon the development of scientific and technical edu- cation. The best technical schools require a high school diploma for admission and have a four-year course of study, but the only technical school on a graduate basis is the School of Mines at Columbia University. Professional education in theology, law, and medicine in the United States was conducted chiefly upon the appren- ticeship system down into the nineteenth century. Though chairs of divinity existed in the colonial colleges in the eighteenth century, systematic preparation for the minis- try was not generally attempted and the prospective minis- ter usually came under the special care of a prominent clergyman who prepared him for the profession. In 1819 Harvard established a separate faculty of divinity, and three years later Yale founded a theological department. Since then about fifty colleges and universities have established theological faculties and about 125 independent theological schools have been founded as the result of denominational zeal. A majority of all these institutions require at least a high school diploma for admission; half of them require a college degree. Nearly all off^er a three-year course of study and confer the degree of bachelor of divinity. History and Fresent Tendencies 17 Previous to the Civil War the 'great majority of legal practitioners obtained their preparation in a law office. Though the University of Pennsylvania attempted to estab- lish a law school in 1791, and Columbia in 1797, both at- tempts were abortive, and it remained for Harvard to estab- lish the first permanent law school in 1817. Even this was but a feeble affair until Justice Joseph Story became asso- ciated with it in 1830. Up to 1870 but three terms of study were required for a degree; until 1877 students were ad- mitted without examination, and special students were ad- mitted without examination as late as 1893. Since then the advance in standards has been very rapid, and in 1899 Har- vard placed its law school upon a graduate basis. Though but few others have emulated Harvard in this respect, the improvement in legal education during the past two decades has been marked. Of the 120 law schools today, the great majority are connected with colleges and universities, de- mand a high school diploma for admission, maintain a three-year course of study, and confer the degree of LL.B. Twenty-four per cent of the twenty thousand students are college graduates. In some of the best schools the induc- tive method of study — i.e., the " case method " — has super- seded the lecture, and in practically all the moot court is a prominent feature. Entrance into the medical profession in colonial times was obtained by apprenticeship in the office of a practicing phy- sician. The first permanent medical school was the medical college of Philadelphia, which was established in 1765 and which became an integral part of the University of Pennsyl- vania in 1791. Columbia, Harvard, and Dartmouth also founded schools before the close of the eighteenth century, and these were slowly followed by other colleges in the early decades of the nineteenth century. During almost the en- tire nineteenth century medical education in the United States was kept on a low plane by the existence of large numbers of proprietary medical " colleges " organized for profit, requiring only the most meager entrance qualifica- tions, giving poor instruction, and having very inadequate 18 College Teaching College edu- cation for women — The inde- ' pendent college equipment in the way of laboratories and clinics. In fact, medical education did not obtain a high standard until the establishment of the Johns Hopkins Medical School in 1893. Since then the efforts of the medical schools connected with the strong universities and of the Rockefeller Foundation to raise the minimum standard of medical education have re- sulted in the elimination of the weakest medical schools. The total number fell from 150 in 1900 to 100 in 1914. Not all of these demand a high school diploma for admis- sion, though the tendency is to stiffen entrance requirements, but all have a four-year course of study. In most insti- tutions experience in laboratory, clinic, and hospital has superseded the old lecture system as the method of instruc- tion. Closely associated with the progress in medicine and to a great extent similar in history has been the progress in dentistry and pharmacy. There are now fifty schools of dentistry, with nearly 9000 students, and seventy-two schools of pharmacy, with nearly 6000 students. One of the most gratifying advances in professional educa- tion has been that of the teacher. Practically all the state universities and many of the universities and colleges upon private foundations have established either departments or schools of education which require at least the same entrance qualifications as does the college proper and in many cases confine the work to the junior and senior years. Teachers College of Columbia University is on a graduate basis. Though many of the 250 training and normal schools throughout the country do not require a high school diploma for admission, the tendency is wholly in that direction. In no field of professional education has the application of scientific principles to actual practice made such progress as in that of the teacher. Few movements in the history of American education had more important results than the academy movement which prevailed during the period between the Revolution and the Civil War. Possibly the principle upon which the new na- tion was established, i. e., the privilege of every individual to make the most of himself, influenced the founders of the History and Present Tendencies 19 academies to make provision for the education of girls be- yond the mere rudiments. Certainly this aspect of the movement had a far-reaching influence. Some of the ear- liest of the academies admitted girls as well as boys from the beginning, and some soon became exclusively female. When it became evident from the work of the academies that sex differences were not of as great importance as had been supposed, it was not a long step to higher education. Some of the academies added a year or two to the curric- ulum and took on the more dignified name of " seminary." In this transition period the influence of a few great per- sonalities was profound, and even a brief sketch of the his- tory of women's education cannot omit to mention the splen- did work of Emma Willard and Mary Lyon. Mrs. Willard was an exponent of the belief that freedom of development for the individual was the greatest desideratum for human- ity. She not only diffused this idea in her addresses and writings but tried to utilize it in the establishment in 1814 of the Troy Female Seminary, which was the forerunner of many others throughout the country. Mary Lyon was rather the representative of the religious influence in education, the embodiment of the belief that to do one's duty is the great purpose in life. In 1837 she founded Mount Holyoke Sem- inary, which had an influence of inestimable value in send- ing well-equipped women throughout the country as teach- ers. The importance of this service was particularly evi- dent during the period of the Civil War. Although a number of excellent institutions for women bearing the name of college were founded before the Civil War, the first one of really highest rank was Vassar College, which opened its doors to students in 1865. Smith and Wel- lesley were founded in 1875, and Bryn Mawr in 1885. These four colleges are in every respect the equal of the best colleges for men. They are the most important of a dozen independent colleges for women, almost all of which are situated in the East. To establish the independent col- lege was the chief method adopted in the older parts of the country to solve the problem of women's higher education, 20 College Teaching The develop- ment of co- education The af- filiated col- lege for women Graduate and pro- fessional studies for women rather than to reorganize colleges for men where conditions were already established. The independent college is not the method that has pre- vailed in the West. When the inspiration to higher educa- tion for women arrived west of the Alleghanies, conditions, especially lack of resources, practically necessitated coedu- cation. Oberlin, founded in 1834, was the first fully co- educational institution of college grade in the world. In 1841 three women received from it the bachelor's degree, the first to get it. Oberlin's success had a pronounced influ- ence on the state universities, which, it was argued, should be open and free to all citizens, since they were supported by public taxation. Almost all the state universities and the great majority of the colleges .and universities on private foundations are today coeducational. The results predicted by pessimists, viz., that the physical health of women would suffer, that their intellectual capacity would depreciate scholarship, and that the interests of the family would be menaced, have not eventuated. The spread of coeducation in the state universities of the West and the South and its presence in the newer private universities like Cornell and Chicago had an influence upon the older universities of the East. This influence has re- sulted in a third method of solving the problem of women's education; viz., the establishment of the affiliated college. Several universities have established women's colleges, sometimes under the same and sometimes under a different board of trustees, to provide the collegiate education for women which is given to men by the undergraduate depart- ments. Barnard College, affiliated with Columbia Univer- sity, Radcliffe College, affiliated with Harvard University, Woman's College, affiliated with Brown University, the Col- lege for Women, affiliated with the Western Reserve Uni- versity, and the H. Sophie Newcomb Memorial College for Women, affiliated with Tulane University, have all been founded within the past forty years. All the universities for men except Princeton and Johns Hopkins and all the fully coeducational institutions admit Fraternities History and Present Tendencies 21 women upon the same terms as men to graduate work. Graduate work is also undertaken with excellent results in some of the independent women's colleges, as at Bryn Mawr. Professional education for women has been coeducational from the beginning, with the exception of medicine. The prejudice against coeducation in that profession was so strong that five women's medical schools were organized, but they provide instruction for little more than a quarter of the women medical students. The increase in the num- ber of women in professional schools has not by any means kept pace with the increase in the colleges. It appears that, with the exception of teaching, woman is not to be a very important f»actor in the learned professions in the near future. Nothing differentiates more clearly the American college Under- from European institutions of higher education than the iife — kind of non-scholastic activities undertaken by the students. From the very beginning the college became a place of resi- dence as well as of study for students from a distance, and the dormitory was an essential element in its life. With increase in numbers, especially after the Revolution, when all distinctions of birth or family were abolished, students naturally divided into groups. The first fraternity. Phi Beta Kappa, was founded in 1776 at William and Mary, with a patriotic and literary purpose, and membership in it has practically ever since been confined to graduates who have attained high scholastic standing. When one speaks of college fraternities, however, he does not refer to $ B K, but to one of the intercollegiate social organizations which have chapters in several colleges organized somewhat upon the plan of a club and whose members live in a chapter , house. The first such fraternity was founded at Yale in 1821, but it was limited to the senior class. The three fra- ternities established at Union in 1825-1827 form the founda- tion of the present system. The fraternities spread rapidly and are today very numerous. There are about thirty of na- tional importance, having about a thousand chapters and a quarter of a million members. The fraternity system is 22 College Teaching Eeligious life Physical education bitterly attacked as being undemocratic, expensive, empha- sizing social rather than scholastic attainments, and, gener- ally speaking, a divisive rather than a unifying factor in college life. Hence some colleges have abolished it. Fra- ternities have been defended, however, as promoting close fellowship and even helping to develop character. So strongly are they entrenched, not only in undergraduate but also in alumni affection, that they probably form a perma- nent element in college life. The early American college was primarily a place to prepare for the ministry, and personal piety was a matter of official enforcement. For a number of reasons religious zeal declined in the eighteenth century. After the Revolu- tion, under the influence of the new political theories and of French skepticism the percentage of students professing to be active Christians fell very low. In the early nineteenth century the interest of students in religion increased, and religious organizations in a number of colleges were founded. Practically all of these later gave way to the Young Men's Christian Association, which has now over 50,000 members organized in almost all the colleges of the country save the Roman Catholic. The religious interests of Roman Catholic students are in many colleges served by the Newman Clubs and similar organizations, and of Jewish students by the Menorah Society. The religion of college students has become less a matter of form and speech and more a matter of service — social service of many kinds at home and missionary service abroad. The educational reformers of Europe in the late eight- eenth and early nineteenth centuries placed great emphasis upon a more complete physical training. This interest was felt in the United States, and simple gymnastic apparatus was set up at Harvard and Yale in 1826. The movement spread very slowly, however, due probably to ignorance of its real physiological import. Since the Civil War the de- velopment of the gymnastic system has been rapid, and now practically every first-class college has its gymnasium, attendance upon which is compulsory, and some have their History and Present Tendencies 23 stadium and natatorium. Of independent origin but hast- ened by the spread of the gymnasium is the vast athletic in- terest of undergraduates. Its earliest form, conducted on a considerable scale, was rowing. The first rowing club was formed at Yale in 1843, and the first intercollegiate race was rowed on Lake Winnepesaukee in 1852, Harvard defeating Yale. Rowing is now a form of athletics at every college where facilities permit. The first baseball nine was formed at Princeton in 1859, and the game spread rapidly to all the other colleges. Football in a desultory and unorganized way made its appearance early in the nineteenth century. As early as 1840 an annual game was played at Yale be- tween the freshmen and the sophomores, but the establish- ment of a regular football association dates from 1872, also at Yale. In the following year an intercollegiate organiza- tion was formed, and since then football has increased in popularity at the colleges to such an extent that just as base- ball has become the great national game, so has football be- come the great American collegiate game. Track athletics is the most recent form of athletic sports to be introduced into the college, and most colleges now have their field days. In addition to these four major forms of college sports, tennis, lacrosse, basketball, and swimming also have a prominent place. The four major sports are usually un- der the control of special athletic associations, which spend large sums of money and have a great influence with the students. In fact, so great has become the interest of col- lege students in athletics that much fear has been expressed about its influence upon scholastic work, and voices are not lacking demanding its curtailment.^ Military training is a phase of physical education which, though it had earlier found a place in the land-grant institutions, came to the fore as a part of the colleges' contribution to winning the world war. Students' Army Training Corps were established at many of the higher institutions of the country, and the aca- demic studies were made to correlate with the military work as a nucleus. At the present time, however, the colleges are 1 W. T. Foster in N. E. A. Reports, 1915. 24 College Teaching Student literary ac- tivities — College journalism Student self-govern- ment putting their work back on a pre-war basis, and it seems most unlikely that military training will survive as a cor- porate part of their work. Journalism, though its actual performance is limited to a small number of students, has had an honored place as an undergraduate activity for almost a hundred years. It served first as a means of developing literary ability among the students, afterwards as a vehicle for college news, and now there has been added to these purposes the uniting of alumni and undergraduates. Hence we find among college journals dailies, monthlies, and quarterlies, .some of them humorous and some with a serious literary purpose. Jour- nalism is not the only method of expressing undergraduate thought. There has been a great revival of intracollegiate and of intercollegiate debating in recent years. Literary societies for debating the great issues preceding the Revolu- tion was the first development of undergraduate life, and every college before and after the Revolution had strong societies. As undergraduate interests increased in number, and especially as the fra«ternity system began to spread, de- bating societies assumed a relatively less important place, but in the past two decades great interest has been revived in them. The glee club, or choral society, along with the college orchestra, minister to the specialized interests of some students, and the dramatic association to those of others. One significant result of such activities has been to establish a nexus between the college and community life. One other feature of undergraduate life cannot be over- looked; viz., student self-government. The college student today is two or three years older than was his predecessor of fifty or sixty years ago. Moreover, with the great in- crease in the number of students has come a parallel in- crease in complexity of administration and in the duties of the college professor. Finally, a sounder psychology has taught the wisdom of placing in the hands of the stu- dents the control of many activities which they can supervise better than the faculty. As a result of these and of other History and Present Tendencies 25 influences, in many colleges today all extra-scholastic activi- ties are either supervised by the student council, the mem- bers of which are elected by the students, or by a joint body of student and faculty members. The eff'ect in almost every instance has been the diminution of friction between the fac- ulty and students and the development of better relations be- tween them. In some colleges the honor system is found, under which even proctoring at examinations does not exist, as all disciplinary matters, including the decision in serious offenses like cheating, rest with the student council. Stu- dent self-government is only one evidence of the democra- tization that has taken place in the administration of the col- lege during the past two decades. Even more noticeable than student self-government is the tendency recently mani- fested to transfer more of the control of the government of the college from the board of trustees to the faculty. With the extension of commerce and the attempt to bring it under efficient organization in the nineteenth century, the demand has been made upon the colleges to train experts in this field. Germany was the first to engage in it, and just before the war probably led the world. France and Eng- land have remained relatively indifferent. In America, the so-called " business college " proved entirely too narrow in scope, and beginning with the Wharton School of Finance and Commerce of the University of Pennsylvania (1881), the higher institutions have begun to train for this import- ant field. Some of the colleges of commerce, like those of Dartmouth and Harvard, demand extensive liberal prepara- tion; others, like Wharton and the schools connected with the state universities, coordinate their liberal and vocational work; a few, like that of New York University, give almost exclusive attention to the practical element. Two other movements might be mentioned as illustrat- ing the attempt to extend the opportunity for higher edu- cation to an ever increasing number of people. One the development of extension courses and the other IS New oppor- tunities in higher edu- cation the offering of evening work the regular sessions. These to are those who cannot attend both steps in the direc- 26 College Teaching The future of the col- lege in American education — Relation to secondary schools The junior college tion of equality of opportunity which is the ultimate aim of education in a democratic country. The college preceded the high school in time, and when the high school began its career in the middle of the nineteenth century it was made tributary to the college in all essentials. By deciding requirements for admis- sion, the college practically prescribed the curriculum of the high school; by conducting examinations itself it practically determined methods of teaching in the high school. But a remarkable change in these respects has taken place in the past two decades. The high school, which is almost omnipresent in our country, has attained independence and today organizes its curricula without much reference to the college. If there be any domina- tion in college entrance requirements today, it is rather the high school that dominates. Over a large part of the country, especially in states maintaining state universi- ties, there are now no examinations for entrance to college. The college accepts all graduates of accredited high schools — i. e., high schools that the state university de- cides maintain proper secondary standards. This growth in strength and independence has been accompanied by a lengthening of the high school course from two years in the middle of the last century to four years at the present time. With the introduction of the principle of promotion by subject instead of by class, the strong high schools have been enabled to undertake to teach subjects in their last years which were formerly taught in the first years of the college. They have done this so well that the practice has grown up in some parts of the country, especially on the Pacific Coast, of extending the course of the high school to six years and of completing in them the work of the first two years of college. This enables more young men and women throughout the state to receive collegiate education, and as the best-equipped teachers in the high schools are usually in the last years and the worst-equipped teachers in the college are usually in the Histof'ij and Present Tendencies 27 first years, the system makes for better education. More- over, it relieves the state universities of the crowds of students in the first two years and permits overworked pro- fessors to concentrate upon the advanced work of the last two years and upon research work in the graduate schools. A system which offers so many advantages and is so pop- ular both in the high, school and the university bids fair to spread. While the movement makinar for the elimination of the Theajbre- . 1 . xvT viated and college from below has been taking place in the West, condensed another movement having the same effect has been taking l^^j^^se place in the East, only the pressure has been from above. The tendency is spreading for the professional schools of the strong universities to demand a college degree for ad- mission. If the full four years of the college are de- manded in addition to the four years of the secondary school and the eight years of the elementary school, the great majority of students will begin their professional education at twenty-two and their professional careers at twenty-six, and they will hardly be self-supporting before thirty. This seems an unreasonably long period of prepa- ration compared to that required in other progressive countries. The German student, for example, begins his professional studies immediately upon graduation from the gymnasium at eighteen. Hence the demand has arisen for a shortening of the college course. This demand has been met in several ways. In some colleges the courses have been arranged in such a way that the bright and in- dustrious student may complete the work required for graduation in three years. In others, as at Harvard, the student may elect in his senior year the studies of the first year of the professional school. Another tendency in the same direction is to permit students in the junior and even in the sophomore years to elect subjects of a vocational nature. This has been bitterly contested by those who hold that the minimum essentials of liberal culture should be acquired before vocational specialization begins. Columbia permits a student to complete his college 28 College Teaching and professional studies in six years, and at the end of that time he receives both the bachelor's and the professional degrees. It is to be noted, however, that these solutions of the problem and, in fact, most other solutions that have been suggested, apply only to a college connected with a univer- sity; they could not be administered in the independent college. But a movement has developed in the Middle West which may result in another solution ; i. e., the Junior College. It can be best understood by reference to the policy of the University of Chicago. That institution divides its undergraduate course into two parts: a Junior College of two years, the completion of whose course brings with it the title of Associate in Arts, and a Senior College of two years, the completion of whose course is rewarded with the regular bachelor's degree. There have become affiliated with the University of Chicago a considerable number of colleges throughout the Mississippi Valley which have frankly become Junior Colleges and confine their work to the freshman and sophomore years. And this has become true of other universities. It would seem inevitable that the bachelor's degree will finally be granted at the end of the Junior College and some other degree, perhaps the master's, which has an anomalous place in American education in any case, at the end of the Senior College, This has, in fact, been suggested by President Butler. The University of Chicago has also struck out in another new direction. Provided a certain amount of work is done in residence at the University, the remainder may be com- pleted in absentia, i. e., through correspondence courses. The Junior College movement has had the excellent re- sult of inducing many weak colleges to confine their work to what they really can afford to do. Many parts of our country have a surplus of colleges, chiefly denominational. Ohio alone has more than fifty. The cost of maintaining dormitories, laboratories, libraries, apparatus, and other equipment and paying respectable salaries cannot be met by the tuition fees in any college. The college must either History and Present Tendencies 29 have a large income-producing endowment, which few have, or must receive gifts sufficient to meet expenses. Gifts to colleges and universities form one of the finest evidences of interest in higher education in the United States, and reach really colossal proportions. In the past fifty years, during which this form of generosity has prevailed, over 600 million dollars have been given, and in 1914 gifts from private sources amounted to more than 30 million dollars. Most of this money is given to the non-sectarian institu- tions and not to the small denominational colleges scattered over the country. As they are in addition unable to compete with the state universities, they are for every reason justified in becoming Junior ' Colleges. But this does not apply to the old independent colleges, such as Amherst, Williams, Dartmouth, etc., which have loyal and wealthy alumni associations. They have the support necessary to retain the four-year course and seem deter- mined to do so. Just what the outcome of the whole question of short- ening the college course may be is not now evident. That concessions in time must be made to the demand for an earlier beginning of professional education seems certain. That the saving should be made in the college course is not so certain. A sounder pedagogy seems to indicate that one year, if not two, can be saved in the period from the sixth to the eighteenth year. It is probable that the arbitrary division of American education into elementary, secondary, collegiate, and university, each with a stated number of years, will give way to a real unification of the educational process. Most Americans would regret to see the college, the unique product of American education, which has had such an honorable part in the development of our civilization, disappear in the unifying process. Stephen Pierce Duggan College of the City of New York 30 College Teaching Bibliography The bibliography on the American college is almost inexhaustible. The list here given is confined to the best books that have appeared since 1900. Angell, J, B. Selected Addresses. New York, 1912. Association of American Universities. Proceedings of the Annual Conference. Butler, N. M. Education in the United States. New York, 1900. Cattell, J. M. University Control. New York, 1913. Crawford, W. H. (editor) . The American College. New York, 1915. (Papers by Faunce, Shorey, Haskins, Rhees, Thwing, Finley, Few, Slocum, Meiklejohn, Claxton.) Cyclopedia of Education, article on " American College.'" New York, 1911. Dexter, E. G. History of Education in the United States. New York, 1904. Draper, A. S. American Education. Boston, 1909. Flexner, a. The American College: A Criticism. General Educa- tion Board, New York, 1908. Foster, W. T. Administration of the College Curriculum.. Boston, 1911. Harper, W. R. The Trend in Higher Education. Chicago, 1905. Kingsley, C. D. College Entrance Requirements. United States Bureau of Education, 1913. MacLean, G. E. Present Standards of Higher Education in the United States. United States Bureau of Education, 1913. National Association of State Universities in the United States of America. Annual Transactions and Proceedings. Risk, R. K. America at College. London, 1908. Snow, L. F. College Curriculum in the United States. New York, 1907. Thwing, C. F. History of Higher Education in the United States. New York, 1906. The American College; What It Is and What It May Become. New York, 1914. College Administration. New York, 1900. West, A. F. Short Papers on American Liberal Education. New York, 1907. II PROFESSIONAL TRAINING FOR COLLEGE TEACHING WERE this chapter to be a discussion of schemes of introduction training, now in operation, that had been devised to prepare teachers for colleges, it could not be written, for there are no such schemes. Many elementary and secondary teachers have undergone training for their life work, as investigators have, by a different regimen, of course, for theirs. But if college and university teachers do their work well, it is because they are born with com- petence for their calling, or were self-taught, or happened to grow into competence accidentally, as a by-product of training for other and partly alien ends, or learned to teach by teaching. There are able college men, presidents and others, who view this situation with equanimity, if not with satisfaction. Teachers are born, not made, it is said. Can pedagogy furnish better teachers than specialized scholarly training? it is asked. If we train definitely for teaching, we shall diminish scholarship, cramp and warp native teaching faculty, and mechanize our class procedure, it is objected. Had the subject of training for college teaching been discussed, no doubt other objections would have been ad- vanced. But it has not been discussed, as will be seen from the very scant bibliography at the end of the chapter. No plan of training for college teaching is in operation, and no discussion of such a plan can be found. Each of a half-dozen men has argued his individual views, and elicited no reply. This state of facts notwithstanding, the subject is well worth discussing, and one may even venture to prophesy that in a decade, or at latest two, the subject will have a respectable literature, and enough training plans will be in operation to permit fruitful comparisons. 31 32 College Teaching How the college teacher has been and is trained When specific training is first urged for specialized work, there always is opposition. The outgoing generation re- members the opposition to specialized training for law, medicine, and engineering, to say nothing of farming, school teaching and business. But in spite of obstructive and retarding objections, specialized types of training for specialized types of work have grown in number and favor, and today we are being shown convincingly that nations which have declined to set up the fundamental types of special training find themselves able to make effective only a fraction of their resources. The majority of the per- sonnel in every higher calling has about average native aptitude for it, and it is just the average man who can be improved in competence for any work by training directed to that end rather than to another. This is, of course, true of college teaching. In early days in this country the great majority of college teachers were clergymen, trained in most cases abroad. Later bookish graduates came to be the chief source of supply, their appointment in their own colleges, and in- frequently in others, following close upon their graduation. Well into the third quarter of last century college faculties were selected almost exclusively from these two types, representatives of the former decreasing and of the latter increasing in relative number. Neither type was specifi- cally trained for teaching in colleges or elsewhere. With the founding and developing of Johns Hopkins University a new era in higher education opened in this country. The paucity of exact scholarship came to be known, and the country's need of scholarship to be ap- preciated. In colleges grown from English seedlings we sought to implant grafts from German universities. In- dependent colleges and colleges within universities, while still called upon by American traditions and needs to pre- pare their students for enlightened living by means of a broadening and liberating training, came to be manned preponderatingly by narrowly specialized investigators, withdrawn from everyday life, with concentrated interests Training for College Teaching 33 focused upon subjects or parts of subjects, rather than upon students. Little thought was, or is yet, given to the prepa- ration of college teachers for their duties as teachers, and that little rested, and still in large measure rests, satisfied with the assumption that by some unexplained and it may be inexplicable transfer of competence a man closeted and intensively trained to search for truth in books and laboratories emerges after three or more years well equipped for divining and developing the mental processes and interests of freshmen. Once fairly examined, this assumption lacks plausibility. " We consider the Ph.D. a scholar's degree and not a teacher's degree," says the dean of one of our leading graduate schools, and yet preparation for this scholar's degree has been and is practically the only formal prepara- tion open to college teachers in this country. It goes without saying that scholarship is one of the Equipment basal needs of college teachers, a scholarship that keeps college alive, and is human and contagious. But it should be re- teachers membered that there are several kinds of scholarship, and it is pertinent to ask what kind college teachers need. Should they, for instance, model themselves on the broad shrewdness and alluring scholarly mellowness of James Russell Lowell or on the untiring encyclopedic exactitude and minuteness of Von Helmholz? Or is there an even better ideal or ideals for them? I would suggest that the teacher's knowledge of his subject should, essentially, be of a kind that would keep him in intellectual sympathy with the undeveloped minds of his students, and this means chiefly two things. The more points of contact of his knowledge with the past experience and future plans of his students the teacher has at his command, the better teacher he will be; for he can use them, not as resting places, but as points of departure for the development of phases of his subject outside the students' experience. And secondly, the teacher should see his subject entire, with its parts, as rich in number and detail as possible, each in its proper place within the whole. For the students' knowledge of 34 College Teaching the subject is vague and general; he is trying to place it, and many other new things, in some kind of a coherent setting; in fact, he is in college largely for the very purpose of working out some sort of rudimentary scheme of things. The duty of the college teacher is to help him in thi^ quite as much as to teach him a particular subject. And, besides, each particular subject can be best taught if ad- vantage is taken of every opportunity to attach it to the only knowledge of it the student has, vague and general though it be. Highly specialized and dehumanized knowl- edge is not as useful for the college teacher as broad and vital knowledge, which is, of course, much harder to ac- quire. Even in the case of " disciplinary " subjects, there is no gain in concealing the human bearings. The teacher should be trained to seize opportunities in the classroom and out to help the student, through his subject and his maturer life experience, to see the bearing of what he is learning on the life about him and on the life he is to lead. This is the college teacher's richest opportunity and the opportunity that tries him most shrewdly. If he is to rise to it, his entire equipment, native and acquired, must come into play. What else does the teacher need? So that he may select the best and continue to improve them, he needs a knowl- edge of the different methods and aims in the teaching of his subject, and, so far as possible, of the results attained by each. Too much of college teaching is a blind groping, chartless and without compass. Instead of expecting each inexperienced teacher to start afresh, he should set out armed with the epitomized and digested teaching experience of those that have gone before him. Finally, the teacher needs a sympathetic and expert understanding of the thinking and feeling of college students. This should be his controlling interest. The teacher, his interest in his subject, and in all else except the student, should be instrumental, not final. Every avail- able strand of continuity between studenthood and teacher- hood should thereafter be preserved. Training for College Teaching 35 This need suggests a capital weakness of the training for the doctorate in philosophy as a preparation for teach- ing. As it proceeds it shifts the interest from under- graduate student to scholarly specialty, and steadily snaps the ties that bound the budding investigator to his college days. It also explains the greatness of some college teachers and personalities before the eighties. Their de- grees in arts were their licenses to teach. They suffered no drastic loss of touch with undergraduate thought and life. In the early years of their teaching this sympathetic and kindly understanding was fresh and strong, and they used it in their classroom and wove it into the tissue of their tutorial activities. A discerning observer of college faculties can even today discover in them men and women who entered them by the same door as these great ones of old, irregularly as we would say now, — without the hall- mark, and whose good teaching is a surprise to their doctored colleagues. In one institution I know of, the best five teachers some years ago were all of this type. The training of college teachers might well, it therefore seems, include an apprenticeship, beginning with, or in exceptional cases before, graduation from college. But the duties and opportunities of the college teacher The college do not stop at the door leading from his classroom. In and admin- addition to dealing directly with students, individually and in groups, and even, if possible, with their families, as he grows in service he becomes, as faculty member and committeeman, a college legislator and administrator. In exercising these important functions he needs the equip- ment that would aid him to take the central point of view, a background of scholarly knowledge of what education in general and college education in particular are in their methods and in their social functions and purposes. There is too much departmental logrolling as well as too much beating of the air in faculty meetings, and too many excur- sions into the blue in faculty legislation and administra- tion arrangements. The educational views of faculty members greatly need to be steadied, ordered, and ap- istrator 36 College Teaching A tenta- tive scheme of training for college teachers preciably broadened and deepened by a developed and trained habit of thinking educationally under the safe- guards of scientific method and on the basis of an adequate supply of facts. That pedagogy has made but the smallest beginning of gathering and ordering such facts and de- veloping a scientific method in this field is not a valid objection. These tasks are no more difficult than others that have been compared, as they will be, the sooner for being imposed. It is significant that coincident with sharp and wide- spread criticism of the American college (justified in part by what college teachers have been made into by their training) , appear demands on the part of faculties for more power. In this connection it may be remembered that autocracy is the simplest and easiest form of govern- ment, and that history shows that it can at least be made to work with less brains and training than are required for the working of democracy. As American colleges and universities have grown in complexity and responsibility, their faculties have lost power because they did not acquire the larger competence that was the indispensable condi- tion of even reasonably successful democratic control. It is highly desirable that the power of faculties should in- crease to the point of preponderance. But the added power they will probably acquire, will not be retained unless faculty members learn their business much better than they now know it in most institutions. Thomas Jefferson, when asked which would come to dominate, the states or the federal government, replied that in the long run each of the opposed pair would prevail in the functions in which it proved the more competent. To outline a scheme of such importance without any experience to examine as a basis is a very bold undertaking, and one that can hope for but partial success. What I shall propose, however, is similar to the proposals of Pitkin (5), Home (11), and Wolfe (14), my only predecessors in this rash enterprise. The general spirit and purpose of our proposals are the same. But we dis- Training for College Teaching 37 agree more or less in details — which is fortunate, as it may encourage discussion of the subject, which is the thing most needed. Indeed, a lively sense of this need has led me to venture some unpopular assertions. It may also be admitted that the desiderata for teachers mentioned above are not likely to be all insured by any system of training. The proposal submitted for discussion is that a three- year graduate course be established, its spirit and purpose being to train young men to become college teachers. This course should lead to a doctorate; e. g., to the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, or of Doctor of Philosophy in Teaching, or of Docendi Doctor. What degree is selected is, in the long run, relatively unimportant, provided the course is soundly conducive to its end. The course might well be divided into three parts, having the approximate relative value in time and effort of two fifths, two fifths, and one fifth. These parts should pro- ceed simultaneously throughout the three years, the first being an apprenticeship — under supervision, of course — in the functions of the college teacher, the second a broad course of study and investigation of the subject to be taught, and the third a course of pedagogical study and investiga- tion. Let me suggest a minimum of detail within these outlines. The apprentice teacher would, naturally, do the least classroom teaching during his first year, and the most during his last. He would also each year " advise " a group of freshman in studies and in life, or cooperate with students in the conduct of athletics, dramatics, publication work, or other " activities." On all this apprentice work he would report, and in all he would be guided and super- vised appropriately by the department whose subject he was teaching, by the department of education, and by other departments concerned. This and other parts of the train- ing would attract others in addition to narrowly bookish graduates, something much to be desired (other parts would eliminate those not bookish enough), and would tend to keep alive in all apprentices an interest in students, 38 College Teaching especially in student character, and to prevent them from thinking of students as disembodied minds. The course of study and investigation in the subject to be taught should be based on adequate undergraduate work in the same and allied fields, and should be something like the honor course in Oxford or Cambridge (or our old M.A. course) in its conduct and purpose; it should hark back to our collegiate origin in England. The work should be in charge of a don, a widely and wisely read and a very human guide, philosopher, and friend. Stated class meetings and precise count of hours of attendance should receive little emphasis. But wide reading of the subject, in a spirit that breeds contagion, running off into a study, in books, laboratories, and meetings, of the human and practical bearings of the subject, should be re- quired, and enough conference with the don should be had to enable him to judge and criticize the student's plan and amount of work, to test his mettle in handling the subject, and to aid him to grasp it as a whole and in its chief subdivisions, and to get glimpses of its bearings on and place in human life. This part of the training should lead up to and culminate in a thesis dealing with some major phase of the subject comprehendingly in its setting and connections. Naturally this program could be carried out most successfully with the social subjects, which lend themselves easily to culture, like history or philosophy, and less completely with the exact subjects, which are better fitted for precise discipline, like mathematics. But if treated, as far as possible, after the manner indicated, even the latter could be made better instruments for the training of college teachers than they are now in narrow specializa- tion for the Ph.D degree. Among returning Rhodes scholars some excellent material for dons could be found. The fifth of the course directed to pedagogy should in- clude a very brief study of the methods of teaching the chosen subject, with glimpses into teaching methods in general; and courses in the history and philosophy of edu- Training for College Teaching 39 cation, with emphasis on, but by no means exclusive deal- ing with, the educational and social functions of the college. It might include an intensive investigation of some rela- tively simple college problem in preparation for future faculty membership. All this should, of course, be in- timately articulated with the student's apprenticeship work. Such a course of pedagogical study should furnish a basis for better teaching methods and for helpful self-criticism therein ; should encourage the formation of a habit of think- ing and working out educational problems scientifically with eyes open to the purpose of the college as a whole; and should discourage departmental selfishness in legisla- tion and administration. The college would, under this plan, have some of its incidental teaching done at minimum cost by student teachers, who should receive only the graduate scholarship or fellow- ship now customary for Ph.D. candidates. Care would be necessary to prevent the assignment to them of mere routine hackwork without training value. It is safe to say that, though slightly less mature, their services, being super- vised, would be more valuable than those rendered during their first few years of teaching by most better-paid winners of the doctorate of philosophy, who, if they do so at all, grope their way to usefulness as teachers, with little aid from others more experienced. With good teaching prepared for, required, and adequately rewarded (a point to be developed later), somewhat longer schedules could properly be assigned and further economy effected. Schedules would, of course, have to be kept short enough to allow ample time for reading, for some writing, and for faculty and committee work in later years. But time would not be required by college teachers for specialized research, and the freedom from such tasks resulting for them would be a blessed relief to many who are now compelled to assume a virtue they have not, and to conceal the love of teaching they have. And when we bear in mind the heavy mass of uninspired and unimportant hackwork that is now dumped on the 40 College Teaching Consequent change of plan in ap- pointments and promo- tions scholarly world, we shall welcome the prospect of a light- ened burden for ourselves. The need of students, especially of freshmen, for advis- ers is widely recognized. They come into a new freedom exercised in a new environment. This makes for bewilder- ment that involves loss of precious time and opportunities, and presents perils which involve possible injuries to many and certain injuries to some. Efforts, many and various, to constitute a body of advisers chosen from among faculty members have met with but little success. With few ex- ceptions the task is not congenial to those who now man our faculties, and for that and other reasons they are ill fitted for it. But a greater measure of success has been attained, even under present conditions, when the coopera- tion of volunteers from among seniors and graduate students has been had. This suggests that the problem might come nearer solution when some dependence came to be placed upon the services of apprentices. Such serv- ice would be a part of their regular work having a bear- ing on their future career, and would therefore be super- vised and rest on sustained interest and the consciousness that it was counting. Finally, young student teachers would, under proper en- couragement and arrangement, help materially to bridge the gulf, that is broader than is wholesome, between a faculty of mature men and young students. The mixing of these different generations, so far as possible, is much to be desired, difficult as it is to accomplish. This is not the place to discuss the details of appointment and promotion plans, interesting and important as they are. But it is evident that the scheme of training outlined, if adopted, would call for changes in present practices. The appointing authorities of colleges looking for young teachers could ascertain their strong and weak points as they developed during their apprenticeship in classrooms and in other educational activities, as well as the quality and trend of their scholarship. They would not rest satis- fied with ascertaining the minute corner of the field of T?mning for College Teaching 41 philosophy, history, or physics in which a man recom- mended had done research. Records could be kept throw- ing much-needed light on the teaching ability, scholarship, and personality of candidates for appointment. In selecting college teachers, appointing authorities would value this evidence and would come to prefer teaching power to investigating ability. Moreover, the record keeping, and, no doubt, some of the supervision begun during the apprentice years would continue during the early instructorial years. This would render it possible to evaluate and to value effectiveness in teaching in making promotions. Ambitious teachers would no longer be practically forced, as their only resort, to neglect their students and give their best energies to publi- cation in order to make a name and get a call, in the in- terest of promotion. The expert teacher would have a chance and a dignity equal to that of the skilled investigator. The individual could follow, and not be penalized for so doing, his own bent and the line of his highest capacity. The training now given in graduate schools here and Training elsewhere for the doctorate in philosophy will, of course, gators continue, and increase rather than diminish. Investigators will be preferred in research, in universities, and in some colleges and college departments. They will be increas- ingly prized in the government service and in important branches of industry. The recent terrible experiences burn into our minds the imperative need strong nations have of exact knowledge and of skill that has a scientific edge. And the specific training for these great tasks will be stronger when it is based on a college course in which highly effective and whole-hearted teaching is valued and rewarded. Sidney E. Mezes College of the City of New York 42 College Teaching Bibliography Anonymous. Confessions of One Behind the Times. Atlantic, Vol. 3, pages 353-356, March, 1913. Canby, H. S. The Professor. Harpers, April, 1913. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Bulletin No. 2, May, 1908, pages 55-57. Flexner, Abraham. Adjusting the College to American Life. Sci- ence, Vol. 29, pages 361-372. Handschin, C. H. Inbreeding in the Instructional Corps of Amer- ican Colleges and Universities. Science, Vol. 32, pages 707-709. November, 1910. Holliday, Carl. Our " Doctored " Colleges. School and Society, Vol. 2, pages 782-784. November 27, 1915. HoRNE, Herman H. The Study of Education by Prospective College Instructors. School Review, Vol. 16, March, 1908, pages 162- 170. Pitkin, W. B. Training College Teachers. Popular Science^ Vol. 74, pages 588-595. June, 1909. Report of the Committee on Standards of American Universities. Science, Vol. 29, page 172. November 17, 1908. Robinson, Mabel L. Need of Supervision in College Teaching. School and Society, Vol. 2, pages 514-519, October 9, 1915. Sanderson, E. D. Definiteness of Appointment and Tenure. Sci- ence, Vol. 39, pages 890-896, June, 1914. Stewart, Charles A. Appointment and Promotion of College In- structors. Educational Review, Vol. 44, 1912, pages 249-256. WiLCZYNSKi, E. J. Appointments in College and Universities. Sci- ence, February 28, 1909; Vol. 29, pages 336ff. Wolfe, A. B. The Graduate School, Faculty Responsibility, and the Training of University Teachers. School and Society, Septem- ber 16, 1916. Ill GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF COLLEGE TEACHING THE investigator of educational practices and methods of teaching is impressed with an unmistakable educa- tional anti-climax, for the conviction grows on him that elementary school teaching is on a relatively high plane, that secondary school teaching is not as effective, and that collegiate teaching, with rare exceptions, is ineffective and in urgent need of reform. A superficial survey of educa- tional literature of the last ten years shows that while the problem of the high school is now receiving earnest atten- tion, elementary education continues to absorb the earnest efforts of an army of vitally interested investigators. The field of college pedagogics is still virgin soil, and no sig- nificant or extensive program for improved methods of teaching has yet been advanced. Three earnest and intelligent students representing three colleges of undisputed standing were asked informally about their instructors for the current semester. Nothing was said to make these students aware that their judgment would hold any significance beyond the friendly conversation. The summary of opinions is offered, not because the investiga- tion is complete and affords a basis for scientific conclusion, but because it reflects typical college teaching in three recog- nized institutions of more than average standing. status of teaching in the colleges Student No. I Teacher A : A pop- ular and interesting teacher, talks enthusi- astically but talks all the time. Lessons as- signed are not heard. Students seldom recite. Written quizzes on themes of assigned reading are rated by an assistant. The work comes back with an A, a C, or a D, but we do Student No. II T packer A : A good teacher of mathematics. He assigns a new les- son for home study. The next day he asks auestions on this lesson. The answers are writ- ten out on the black- boards. After fifteen minutes all students take their seats and the work on the blackboard is taken up for expla- 43 Student No. Ill Teacher A : A very popular teacher of English. If the final examination is given by another teacher. I may not have enough spe- cific facts to pass. We began Chaucer last week. He spent a good part of each ses- sion reading to us. All of us were sur- prised to find how 44 College Teaching Student No. I not know why the rat- ing was given. Fre- quently two students who worked together are marked B and D respectively for the same work. Some- times a student who " cribbed " his outline from another who actu- ally " worked it up " receives a higher mark than was given for the original. Teacher B : Rather an interesting teacher ; assigns lessons from a book. At the begin- ning of the hour he asks questions on the text but is soon carried away and rambles along for the period, touching on every sub- ject. We never com- plete a chapter or topic. The succeeding hour we take the next chapter, which meets the same fate. Writ- ten tests determine the students' rank. The grade for the written test is announced, but the papers are not re- turned and one never knows why the papers were rated C or D. Teacher C: A con- scientious teacher in physics. He assigns a definite lesson for each recitation of the term. Student No. II nation. He explains every difficulty very clearly. We rarely cover the lesson. Some topics go unexplained because during the next hour the blackboard problems are based on the new lesson. If I understood the second half of each lesson as clearly as the first, I would feel hopeful of a good grade in the final examination. Teacher B : A dry course in Art History and Appreciation. We take up the history of architecture, painting, and sculpture. The names of the best art- ists are mentioned, and their many works con- fuse us. We memorize Praxiteles, Phidias, Myron, the ancient cairns, the parts of an Egyptian temple. Pic- tures are shown on the screen. I elected this course in the hope that it would teach me something about pic- tures, how to judge them and give me standards of beauty, etc., but it has been history and not appre ciation so far. We do not see any beauty in the pictures of old madonnas. Even the religious ones among us say this. Teacher (7: A good, clear, effective lecturer in chemistry. Everv lesson we learn a defi- nite principle and its Student No. Ill much more the text meant than after our own reading. In the last session we went to our book on literature and tried to justify the characterization which the author gives of Chaucer. The class agreed with all in the book except in one characterization. In the composition work we took up the structure of short narratives. The assignment was to find narratives in cur- rent periodicals, in the writings of standard authors, in newspapers, and then attempt to find whether the struc- ture we studied was followed. In each case we had to justify any departure from the standard. There was little time for the foot- notes in Chaucer. I hope we are not asked for these on the final examination. Teacher B ; A very conscientious teacher of chemistry. He gives us a ten-minute written quiz each hour on the work in the book or on the matter discussed in the last lecture. The rest of the hour is spent in explanation of difficult points and in the appli- cation of what we learned, to industry and physiologj\ It is surprising to see the interest the class shows in the chemical expla- nations of things we never noticed before. Teacher C : A schol- arly instructor in his- tory. He assigns thirty to forty pages in English history, and General Principles of College Teaching 45 Student No. I At the beginning of the hour students go to the board to write out answers to questions on the lesson. The hour is spent listening to the recitation of each stu- dent and the explana- tion of difficult points. We never cover more than one half of the lesson ; sometimes only one third. The next hour the questions are on the new lesson, not on the incompleted portion of the former lesson. My knowledge of physics is punctu- ated by areas of igno- rance. These alternate with topics that I think I understand clearly. Teacher D : A quiet, modest man. Sits back comfortably in his seat and asks questions on assigned texts. The questions review the text, and he explains in further detail the facts in the book. The con- scientious and capable student finds him su- perfluous ; the indiffer- ent student remains un- moved by his phleg- matic presentation ; the poor student finds him a help; the shirk who listens and takes notes is saved studying at home. Teacher E : A good teacher of Latin. He explains the work, hears the lessons, gives drills, calls on almost everybody every hour. The written work is re- turned properly cor- rected and rated. Student No. II application. The lab- oratory work of each week is related to the lecture and throws in- teresting side lights on it. We have quiz sec- tions once a week. Here the work is oral and written. Teacher D : A very strict teacher of Eng- lish literature. He as- signs text for study, and we must be pre- pared for detailed ques- tions on each of the great writers. He is very strict and de- tailed. We had to know all the fifteen qualities of Macaulay's style. " No, we did not read Macaulay this term ; we study from a history of English lit- erature that tells us all about the master writ- Tcacher E : A quiet, dignified gentleman %vho teaches us psy- chology. A chapter is assigned in the book, and the hour is spent hearing students recite on the text. He stacks closely to the book. He explains clearly when the book is not clear or not specific enough. The hours drag, for the book is good and those who studied the lessons weary at what seems to us needless repetition. Student No. Ill then he lectures to us about the topics dis- cussed by the author. He points out errors in dates and places. Occa- sionally he calls on a student. At the end of each month he gives a written test. We re- member little of what we learned and must " bone away " at about 200 to 300 pages. His English is delight- ful and we enjoy listen- ing at times, but I seem to retain so little. " Yes, half the term is up. We are beginning the reign of Henry VII." Teacher D : A very enthusiastic lecturer in economics. He ex- plains the important principles in economics. We follow in a printed syllabus, so that it is unnecessary to take notes. He talks well and makes things clear. We are given assign- ments in S 's " Ele- ments of Economics," on which we are ques- tioned by another teacher. " Is the work in the quiz section re- lated directly to the lec- tures ? Sometimes. No, we do not take current economic problems. These are given in a later elective course." Teacher E : An in- structor in psychology'. His hours are weary and dreary. A chap- ter is assigned in X's " Elements of Psy- chology." He asks a question or two and then repeats what the author tells us. even using the illustrations and diagrams found in the text. Sometimes a student reads a paper which he prepared. " No, we do not get very much oxit of these papers read by stu- dents. But then we get just as little from the instructor. No, we 46 College Teaching Student No. I Teacher F: One cannot pass judgment on this teacher of me- chanical drawing. He gives out a problem, works a type on the board, and then dis- tributes the plates. We draw. He heli)s us when we ask for aid, otherwise he walks about the room. I suppose one cannot show teaching ability in such a subject. Student No. II Teacher F : A learn- ed Latin scholar who is very enthusiastic about his specialty. The students exhibit cheerful tolerance. He assigns a given num- ber of lines per day. These Ave prepare at home. In class we give a translation in English that has dis- torted phrases and clauses, lest we be ac- cused of dishonesty in preparation. The rest of the time is spent on questions of syntax, references, footnotes, and the identification of the real and myth- ological characters in the text. The teacher is animated and ef- fective. Student No. Ill never apply the psy- chology to our own thinking nor to teach- ing nor to the behavior of children or adults." Teacher F : A for- bidding but very strict Latin teacher. His questions are fast and numerous and the hesi- tating student is lost. He assigns at least twenty-five per cent more per lesson than any other instructor. The hour is spent in translating, parsing, and quizzing on histo- rical and mythological allusions. Every "pony" user is soon caught, be- cause he is asked so many questions on each sentence. There is a distinct relief when the hour is over because he is constantly at you. "Will I take the next course in Latin ? Not unless I must. This is prescribed work. It can't end too soon for me, nor for the others in the class." Causes of ineffective college teaching The Student of scientific and statistical measurements in education may object to attaching any importance to these informal characterizations of college teachers by under- graduates. College teachers interested in the pedagogical aspects of their subject, and college administrators who spend time observing class instruction will concede that these young men were not at all unfortunate in their teach- ers. The significance of these characterizations is not that college teachers vary in teaching efficiency, but rather that inefficient college teaching is general, and that the causes of this inefficiency are such as respond readily to simple remedial measures very well known to elementary and high school teachers. It may be well to note the chief causes of ineffective col- lege teaching before directing attention to a remedial pro- gram: (a) Many college teachers hold to be true the time- General Principles of College Teaching 47 honored fallacy that the only equipment for successful teaching is a thorough knowledge of the subject. They do not stop to square their belief with actual facts. They over- look the examples of their colleagues possessed of undis- puted scholarship who are failures in the classroom. They fail to realize that there are psychological and pedagogical aspects of the teaching art which demand careful organiza- tion, skilful gradation and a happy selection of illustrations intimately related to the lives of the students. (b) Closely related to this first cause of ineffective teaching is a lack of sympathetic understanding of the student's viewpoint. The scholarly teacher, deep in the intricacies and speculations of his specialty, is often im- patient with the groping of the beginner. He may not realize that the student before him, apparently indifferent to the most vital aspects of his subject, has potentialities for development in it. His interest in his researches and his vision of the far-reaching human relations of his sub- ject may blind him to the difficulties that beset the path of the beginner. (c) The inferiority of college teaching in many institu- tions can often be traced to the absence of constructive supervision. The supervising officer in elementary and secondary schools makes systematic visits to the class- rooms of young or ineffective teachers, observes their work, offers remedial suggestions, and tries to infuse a profes- sional interest in the technique of teaching. In the college such supervision would usually stir deep resentment. The college teacher is, in matters of teaching, a law unto him- self. He sees little of the actual teaching of his colleagues; they see as little of his. His contact with the head of his department, and his departmental and faculty meet- ings,- are usually limited to discussions of college policy and of the sequence and content of courses. Methods of teaching are rarely, if ever, brought up for discussion. The results are inevitable. Weaknesses in teaching are perpetuated, while the devices and practices of an effective teacher remain unknown to his colleagues. 48 College Teaching id) A fourth factor which accounts for much of the in- efficiency in college pedagogics is made the thesis of Dr. Mezes' chapter on " The Training of the College Teacher." The college teacher, unlike teachers in other grades of an educational system, is expected to teach with- out a knowledge of educational aims and ideals, and with- out a knowledge of the psychological principles which should guide him in his work. The prospective college teacher, having given evidence of scholarship alone, has intrusted to him, the noisy, expressive, and rapidly de- veloping youth. We set up no standards aside from char- acter and scholarship. We do not demand evidence of teaching ability, a knowledge of applied psychology and of accepted teaching practices, skill in presentation, power of organizing material in graded sequence, or ability to frame a series of questions designed to stimulate and sus- tain the self-activity of the pupils. The born college teacher remains the successful teacher. The poor college teacher finds no agent which tends to raise his teaching to a higher level. The temperamentally unfit are not weeded out. But teaching is an art, and like all arts it requires conscientious professional preparation, the mastery of underlying scientific principles, and practice under super- vision scrupulous in its attention to technique. We have here outlined a few of the causes which keep college teaching on a low plane. The remedial measures are in each case too obvious to mention. It re- mains for college authorities to formulate a well-conceived and adjustable program of means and m.ethods of ridding college teaching of those forces which keep it in a dis- couraging state. It is our purpose in the remainder of this chapter not to evolve a system of pedagogics, but rather to touch on the most vital principles in teaching which must be borne in mind if college teaching is to be rendered peda- gogically comparable to elementary and secondary teaching. We shall confine ourselves to teaching practices which are applicable to all subjects in the college curriculum. General Principles o f College Teaching 49 PRINCIPLES IN COLLEGE TEACHING One of the very first elements in good teaching is the ^ clearly clear recognition of a well-defined aim that gives purpose atS'^musf and direction to all that is attempted in a lesson or in a <^°"tr?iaii period. The chief cause of poor teaching is aimless teach- ^^^ '"^ ing, in which the sole object seems to be to fill the allotted time with talking about the facts of a given subject. We sit patiently through a recitation in English literature. Act I, Scene 1 of Hamlet had been assigned for home study and is now, the text for the hour. Questions are asked on the dramatic structure of this scene, on versification, on the meaning of words and expressions now obsolete, on peculiarities of syntax, and finally a question or two on a character portrayal. The bell brings these questions to an abrupt end. Ask teacher and students the aim of all these questions. To the former, they are means of test- ing the students' knowledge of a variety of facts of language and literature; to the latter they mean little, and serve only to repress a living interest and appreciation of living literary text. How much more effective the hour in English literature would have been if the entire act had been as- signed with a view to giving the students an insight into the dramatic structure of each scene in this act and of the act as a whole. All the questions would then bear on dramatic movement, on the dramatist's technique, on his way of arousing interest in his story, on devices for giving the cause and the development of the action. In the opening scene we read: Elsinore. A Platform before the Castle. Francisco at his post. Enter to him Bernardo. Ber. Who's there? Fran. Nay, answer me ; stand, and unfold yourself. Ber. Long live the King ! Fran. Bernardo? Ber. He. Fran. You come most carefully upon your hour. . Ber. 'Tis now struck twelve; get thee to bed, Francisco. 50 College Teaching The educa- tional aim vs. the in- structional aim Fran, For this relief much thanks : 'tis bitter cold. And I am sick at heart. Ber. Have you had a quiet guard? Here we see the guard on duty challenged by his relief, a most unusual procedure. Why does this experienced guard so far forget the customary forms as to challenge the guard on duty? What possible reason can there be for this? How would you read the second line? What words must be emphasized to show the surprise of the challenged guard? If the entire hour were given to the whole of Act I and all the questions sought to reveal to the students Shakespeare's power of dramatic structure, a definite and lasting impression would be carried away. Act I should be assigned again, but with a different aim. The teacher now seeks to make clear to the student the dramatist's method of character portrayal. A third hour may be spent on certain portions of this act in which attention is given to significant facts of language, choice of words, or poetic form. When a guiding aim controls, all questions, suggestions, explanations, and illustrations tend to create in the mind of the pupil a rich and unified impres- sion. Where no distinct aim gives direction to the work, the student is confused by a variety of facts — isolated facts — that are displaced by another group o'f disjointed bits of information. Aimless teaching leads to mental wander- ing on the part of the student; teaching governed by a definite aim leads to mental development and to the acquisi- tion of new viewpoints and new power. We must distinguish clearly between the general or edu- cational aim and the specific or instructional aim. The former sums up the hope of an entire course or an entire subject. In the teaching of literature we hope to develop a vital interest in reading, a discriminating taste, an en- livened imagination and a quickened perception which en- able the student to visualize the situations and to ac- quire the thought on the printed page. The instruc- tional aim, however, is much more specific; it posits a task that can be accomplished in a very limited time; it General Principles of College Teaching 51 seeks to give an insight into Shakespeare's mastery of words, or into his power of character portrayal, or into his methods of enhancing dramatic interest. Each of these two types of aims has its unmistakable influence on methods of teaching. What aim should we select to guide us in formulating The variety principles of collegiate teaching? The question is almost tha^mly basic, for the selection of a proper aim gives color and govern direction to all our teaching. In brief, the aim may be one of the following: (a) The informational aim. A given course in chemistry or physics may be designed to sum up for the student the vital facts necessary for an intelligent comprehension of common phenomena. With such an aim, it is obvious that only so much laboratory work will be assigned as will give the student a general knowledge of the tools and methods of laboratory work; that the major portion of the work will be divided into occasional lectures, regular book assign- ments, and extensive applications of knowledge gained to surrounding chemical and physical phenomena. A language course may seek to give pupils a stock of words designed to develop power to read the language in a very short time. Obviously, grammatical work and translations into the mother tongue will now be minimized, and those devices which give the eye the power to find thought in new symbols will be emphasized. There is no standard for determining the relative importance of this informa- tional or utilitarian aim when compared to other aims. The significant thing is, not so much to discover its rela- tive importance, but, having adopted it, to devise methods which clearly tend to bring the students to an eff^ective realization of it. ih) The disciplinary aim. On the other hand, the con- trolling aim in any subject may be to develop the power to reason about natural phenomena, the power to ob- serve, and the power to discriminate between vital and inconsequential details. If this be the aim, the assign- ment of subject matter must be reduced, the phenomena 52 College Teaching ■ - . - . - ■ -- - ■ ' ■ studied must be submitted in the forms of problems, first- hand observations must be made, and students must be led to see the errors in their observations and their reasoning. The course which is extensive in subject matter and which relies on the lecture method sacrifices mental discipline for information. From the teaching point of view, the result of the time-honored quarrel between the disciplinists and the utilitarians is not so important as the adoption of a definite aim, and the formulation of consistent methods of teaching in order to attain that aim. Ineffective teaching is not caused by the selection of the one aim or of the other, but by systems of instruction devoid of any aim at all. (c) The appreciative or aesthetic aim. It is obvious that a subject may be taught for the power it develops for aesthetic appreciation of the arts of lifco We have here a legitimate aim of coordinate importance with the two pre- ceding ones; and if we adopt it, the vital thing in teaching is to allow this appreciative aim to mold all instructional effort. It is obvious that a college course in aesthetics must be inspirational, must seek to develop a real appreciation of the beauty of line, of color and of sound. Such a course must, therefore, encourage contact with the products of art, rather than promote the study of texts on the history of any of the arts. So, too, courses in music or in literature which do not send the student away with an intense desire to hear, to see, to feel the masterpieces of music or literature must be judged dismal failures. The formalization of an art course given to the general student, kills the live material and leaves the student himself cold. id) The aim to teach technique. An effective college course may select for its aim the development of the technique of a given subject. It is obvious that a science course governed by this aim will emphasize the laboratory method at the expense of information; that a course in the social sciences will seek to cover less ground but will develop in the student the power to find facts and use them to formulate an intelligent conclusion; that a course in General Principles of College Teaching 53 biology will minimize names, classifications and structures, but will emphasize field and laboratory work and the modes of utilizing the data thus discovered. We must repeat the statement made before, that no one can set himself up as the final arbiter of the claims of these contending aims. They are all vitally necessary for a thorough understanding of life's problems. The significant conclusion for teaching is that one or more of these aims must be consciously chosen and that content and method must be determined by them absolutely. Teaching for the sake of teaching consumes time and makes drafts on energy, but it leaves the student no richer in power and with no truer understanding. It is obvious that no general law can be formulated for should the the adjustment of aims to the needs of students. Teachers J^ fo^j."^°*^^" have usually found it necessary to change the aim, the varying content, and the method of a course according to the needs ftudents? of different classes of students. In one of our colleges science students are required to take two years of Latin. The course offered these young men gives the ordinary drill in grammar, translation, and analysis of Caesar, Cicero, and Vergil, as well as practice in prose composition in which nondescript and disjointed English sentences, grammati- cally correct, are turned into incorrect Latin. This de- scription, without any changes whatever, applies also to the course given in the introductory years in Latin to students specializing in the arts. Even a superficial analysis re- veals a different set of needs in the two classes of students which can be served only by a corresponding difference in content and mode of teaching. A student who takes French or German because he wants enough mastery of these languages to enable him to read in foreign journals about the progress of his specialty must be given a course which appeals to the eye and minimizes the grammatical and con- versational phases of these languages. There are courses that are foundational and that must therefore be governed by an eclectic aim. In the first course in college physics it is obvious that we must teach the necessary facts of the subject as well as its method. These 54 College Teaching aspects of the work must be emphasized with equal force for all students; no differentiation need be made for future medical or engineering students or for prospective teachers of the subject in secondary schools. Generally speak- ing, initial courses in a department are governed by an eclectic aim, but in the advanced courses there must be constant adjustment to the needs of various groups. An eclectic aim can be as effective an instrument in enhancing the quality of teaching as a single, clear-cut aim, provided there is a clear recognition of the relative importance of the ends set up, and provided a definite plan is evolved to attain them. The aim or aims of a subject or a lesson, once formu- lated, must always be kept before the students as well as before the teacher. Every pupil must know the ends to be attained in the course he is taking, and as work progresses he must experience a growing realization that the class is moving toward these ends. The subject matter of the course, the method of instruction, the assigned task, now glow with interest which springs from work clearly motivated. The average student plods through his semes- ter from a sense of duty or obedience rather than from a conviction of the worth of both subject matter and method. Value of ]\Jq|- Qjjly must the general aim be indicated to the student, fined aims but he must also be made acquainted with the specific aim. Where students have been acquainted with the spe- cific task that must be accomplished in a given period, concentration and cooperation with the instructor are easier; the students can, at stages in the lesson, anticipate succeeding steps; their answers have greater relevancy, their thought is more sequential and flows more readily along the path planned by the instructor. A specific aim for each lesson makes for economy, for it is a standard of relevancy for both student and teacher. The student whose answer or observation is irrelevant is asked to recall the aim of the lesson and to judge the pertinence of his contribution. The instructor given to wandering far afield finds that a General Principles of College Teaching 55 clearly fixed aim is an aid in keeping him in the pre- scribed path. Too many college hours, especially in the social sciences, find the instructor beginning with his sub- ject but ending anywhere in the field of human knowledge. These wanderings are entertaining enough, but they dis- sipate the energies of the students and produce a mental flabbiness already too well developed in the average college student. A second factor which contributes much toward the effectiveness of college teaching is the principle of moti- vation. So long as most of the college course is prescribed, course by course, students will be found pursuing certain studies without an intelligent understanding of their social or mental worth. Ask the student " doing " prescribed logic to explain the value of the course. In friendly or inti- mate discussion with him, elicit his conception of the utilitarian or disciplinary worth of the prescribed Latin or mathematics in the arts course. He sees no relation between the problems of life and the daily lessons in many of these subjects. He submits to the teacher's attempts to graft this knowledge upon his intellectual stock merely be- cause he has learned that the easiest course is to bend to authority. Instruction in too many college subjects is based, not on intelligent and voluntary attention, but on the discipline maintained by the institution or by the in- structor. It is obvious that such instruction is stultifying to the teacher and can never devel-op in the student a liberal and cultured outlook upon life. The principle of motivation in teaching seeks to justify to the student the experience that is presented as part of his college course. It is obvious that this motivation need not always be explained in terms of utilitarian values. A student of college age can be made to realize the mental, the cultural, or the inspirational values that justify the prescrip- tion of certain courses. The college instructor who tries to motivate courses in the appreciation of music or painting finds no great difficulty in leading his students to an enthusi- astic conviction of their inspirational value. It is well Motivation in college teaching 56 College Teaching worth taking the student into our confidence in these mat- ters of aim and value. We must become more tolerant of the thoughtful student who makes honest inquiry as to the value of any of the presented courses. We must learn to regard such questions as signs of growing seriousness and increasing maturity and not as signs of impertinence. We constantly ask ourselves questions about the round of our daily task; we seek to know thoroughly their uses, their values, their meaning in our lives. Clear conception of use or value in teaching is as vital as it is in life — for what is teaching if not the process of repeating life's experiences? In the principle of motivation lies the most successful solution of the problem of interest in teaching. We have too long persisted in the " sugarcoating " conception of interest. We have regarded it as a process of " making agreeable." Interest has therefore been looked upon as a fictitious element introduced into teaching merely to in- veigle the mind of the student into a consideration of what we are offering it. Our modern psychology teaches a truer conception of interest: a feeling accompanying self-expres- sion. Interest has been defined as a feeling of worth in ex- perience. Where this feeling of worth is aroused, the in- dividual expresses his activity to attain the end that he perceives. Every act, every effort, to attain this end is accompanied by a distinctive feeling known as interest. When a class is quiet and gives itself to the teacher, it is obedient and polite, but not necessarily interested. The class that looks tolerantly at the stereopticon views that the instructor presents, or listens to the reading of the profes- sor of English, is amused but not necessarily interested. But when the students ask questions about the pictures or ask the professor of English for further references, then have we evidence of real interest. Interest is, therefore, an active attitude toward life's experience. Rational motiva- tion is almost a guarantee of this active attitude of interest. Intelligent motivation in teaching has far-reaching values for both student and teacher. It stirs interest and guar- antees attention and thus tends to keep aroused the activity General Principles of College Teaching 57 of the students. It establishes an end toward which all eflort of teacher and student must bend. It enables the student to follow a line of thought more intelligently, and occasionally to anticipate conclusions. For the teacher it serves as a standard, in terms of which he reorganizes his subject matter, judges the value of each topic, and omits socially useless matter which has too long been retained in the course in the fond hope that it will in some way develop the mind. The instructor who strives to motivate the subject matter Beginning he teaches usually begins with that phase of the subject ofconuct" which is most intimately related to the student's life and environment. Every subject worth teaching crosses the stu- dent's life at some point. The contacts between pupil and subject afford the most natural and the most effective starting points in the teaching of any subject. The subject matter in a college course is too frequently so organized that it presents points of discrepancy be- tween itself and the student. To the college student life is not classified and systematized to a nicety. Experiences occur in more or less accidental but natural sequence. Scientific classification is the product of a mature mind possessing mastery of a given portion of the field of knowl- edge. To thrust the student, who is just finding his way in a new course, into a thoroughly scientific classification of a subject, is to present in the introduction what should come in the conclusion. Many a student taking his introductory course in psy- chology begins with a definition of the subject, its re- lation to all social and physical sciences, and its classifi- cation. All these are aspects of the subject which the mind conversant with it sees clearly and understands thoroughly, but which the inexperienced student accepts merely because the facts are printed in his text-book. The youthful mind is concerned with the present and with the immediate environment. Too many of our college courses, in the initial stages, transport the student into the realm of theory or into the distant past. The 58 College Teaching point of contact Student cannot orientate himself in this new environment and is soon lost on the highways and byways of classifica- tion; to him the subject becomes a study of words rather than of vital ideas. Why must the introductory course in philosophy begin with the ancient philosophers, and give the major part of the term to the study of dead philosophers and their theories long since refuted and discarded, while vital modern philosophic thought is crowded into the last few sessions of the semester? of"maxr°^^ '^^^ pedagogical significance of beginning at the point Begin at the of contact can best be understood and appreciated by illus- trations of actual teaching conditions. Most initial courses in economics begin by positing that economics is the science of the consumption, distribution, and production of wealth. The student is told that in earlier systems of economics production was studied as the initial economic process, but that the more modern view makes consumption the starting process. All this the student takes on faith. He does not really see its bearings and its implications; he is as uncon- cerned with the new formulation as he is with the old; he feels at once far removed from economics. The suc- ceeding lessons study economic laws with little reference to the economic life that the student lives. In a later chapter he learns a definition of wages, the forces that de- termine wage, and the mode of computing the share of the total produce that must go to wages. Here we have a course that does not begin at the point of contact, that presents the very discrepancies between itself and the student that were noted before. How can we overcome them? By proceeding psychologically. The instructor refers to two or three important wage disputes in current industrial life; these conflicts are analyzed; the contending demands are studied, and the forces con- trolling the adoption of a new wage scale are noted. After this study of actual economic conditions the students are led to formulate their own definition of wages, qnd to dis- cover the forces that determine wage. Their conclusions are of course tentative. The textbook or textbooks are General Principles of College Teaching 59 consuhed in order to verify the formulations and the con- clusions of the class. Thus the course is developed entirely through a series of contacts with economic life. The final topic in the course is the formulation of a definition of economics. Now the class sums up all that it has seen and learned of economics during the year. The cold and empty definition now glows with meaning. Such a course awakens an intelligent interest in economic life; it develops a mode of thought in social sciences. and a sense of self-reliance; it teaches the student that all conclusions are tentative and constantly. subject to verification; it fosters a critical attitude toward printed text. The college graduate who studied college mathematics, advanced algebra, trigonometry, analytical geometry, and calculus, looks back with satisfaction at work completed. Each of these subjects seemed to have little or no relation to the other; each was kept in a water-tight compartment. He remembers few, if any, of the formulae, equations, and symbols. He recalls vividly his admiration of the author's ingenious method of deriving equations. Every succeeding theorem, formula, or equation was another puzzle in a subject which seemed to be composed of a series of diffi- cult, unrelated, and unapplied mathematical proofs. The course ended, the mass of data was soon obliterated from the mind's active possessions. What is the meaning of it all? What is its relation to life? There is no doubt that much of this mathematics has its application to life's needs, and that these successive subjects of mathematics are thoroughly interdependent. But nothing in the mode of instruction leads the student to see either the application or the interrelation of all this higher mathematics. Would it not be better to give a single course called mathematics rather than these successive subjects? Would it not be more enlightening if each new mathematical principle were taught through a situation in building, engineering, or mechanics so that the student would at all times see the intimate relation between mathe- matical law and physical forces? Would not the disci- 60 College Teaching Beginning at the point of contact relates the subject to the life of the student plinary values of mathematics be intensified for the student by teaching it in a way that presents a quantitative inter- pretation of the daily phenomena in his experience? Teachers of philosophy and psychology too often fall into a formalism that robs their subject of all its vital- izing influences. Many a student enters his course in logic with high hopes. At last he is to learn the laws of thought which will render him keen in detection of fallacies and potent in the presentation of argument. How bitter is his disappointment when he finds his course dissipated in definitions and classifications. His logic gives itself to the discussion of such patent fallacies as, " A good teacher knows his subject; Williams knows his subject, therefore he is a good teacher." Day after day he proves the error in every form of stupidity or the truth of what is axio- matic. He tires of " Gold is a metal " and " Socrates is mortal." Few courses in logic have the courage to break away from the traditional formalism and to begin each new principle or fundamental concept of logic by analyzing edi- torials, arguments, contentions in newspapers, magazines, campaign literature, or the actual textbooks. Few students complete their course in logic with a keener insight into thought and with a maturer or more aggressive mental atti- tude. It was pointed out in a previous illustration that the col- lege student " taking philosophy " is seldom made to feel that the subject he studies is related to the problems that arise in his own life. Too frequently introductory courses in philosophy are historical and extensive in scope, striv- ing to develop mastery of facts rather than to give new viewpoints. The student learns names of philosophers, and attempts to memorize the philosophic system developed by each thinker. Such a course imposes a heavy burden on re- tentive power, for no little eff"ort is required to remember the distinctive philosophical systems advocated by the re- spective writers. To the students these philosophers repre- sent a group of peculiar people diff^ering one from the General Principles of College Teaching 61 other in their degrees of " queerness." One system is as far removed as another from the life that the student ex- periences; no system helps him to find himself. An intro- ductory course in philosophy should begin with the prob- lems of philosophy; it should have its origin in the reflective and speculative problems of the student himself. As the course progresses, the student should feel a growing sense of power, an increasing ability to formulate more clearly, to himself at least, the questions of religion and ethics that arise in the life of a normal thinking person. So, too, courses in ethics and psychology lose the vital touch unless they begin in the life of the student and apply their lessons to his social and intellectual environment. It must be pointed out, however, that the social sciences lend themselves more readily to this intimate treatment than do languages, or the physical sciences, but at all points possible in the study of a subject, the experience of the student must be introduced as a means of giving the subject real meaninsj. In teaching composition and rhetoric illus- trations of the canons of good form need not be restricted to the past. Current magazines and newspapers are not devoid of effective illustrations. When the older literary forms are used exclusively as models of language, the student ends his course with the erroneous notion that con- temporary writing is cheap and sensational and devoid of artistic craftsmanship. Courses in physics and chemistry frequently devote them- selves to a development of principles rather than to the applications of the studies to every sphere of life. Intro- ductory college courses in zoology spend the year in the minutiae of the lowest animal forms and rarely reach any ianimal higher in the scale than the crayfish. We still find students in botany learning the various margins of leaves, the system of venation, the scientific classifications, but at the end of the course, unable to recognize ordinary leaves and just as blind to nature as they were before. Zoology and botany do not always — as they should — give a new 62 College Teaching Pedagogical vs. logical organization view of life, a new attitude towards living phenomena, a new contact with nature. Careful inquiry among college students will reveal an amazing ignorance of common chemical and physical phenomena after full-year courses in chemistry and physics. We find a student giving two semesters to work in each of these subjects. He spends most of his time learning the chemical elements, their characteristics and the modes of testing for them. The major portion of the time is spent in the laboratory, where he must discover for himself the elementary practices of the subject and test the validity of well-established truths. At the end of his second semes- ter he has not developed sufficient laboratory technique for significant work in chemistry; he is ignorant of the chem- ical explanation of the most common phenomena in life. There is much to be said for the position taken by the " older teachers," who may not possess the scholarship of the " younger investigators " but who argue for a general course in which laboratory work shall be reduced, technique mini- mized, and attention focused on giving an extensive view of chemical forces. The simple chemical facts in digestion, metabolism, industry, war, medicine, etc., would be pre- sented in such a way as to make life a more intelligent process and to give an insight into the method of science. In the courses that follow the introductory one, there would be a marked change in aim; the student would be taught the laboratory technique and would be given a more intensive study of the important aspects of chemistry. Similar changes in the introductory courses in physics are urged by these same teachers. Beginning at the point of contact may frequently inter- fere with the logical arrangement of the course of study; it may wrench many a topic out of its accustomed place in the textbook; it will demand that the applications, which come last in most logically arranged courses, be given first and that definitions and principles which come first be given last. This logical arrangement, it was pointed out, is usually the expression of the matured mind that is General Principles of College Teaching 63 thoroughly conversant with every aspect of a subject; it may mean little, however, to the beginner — so little that he does not even slightly appreciate its significance. The loss in logical sequence entailed by beginning at the point of contact is often more than compensated for by the advan- tages which are derived from a psychological presentation. Proper ^. „ .11 ^' • 1 • 1 organization A well-organized lesson possesses teacnmg merits wnicri as a factor in may counteract ahnost all the usual weaknesses found in poor teaching. Good organization determines clearness of comprehension, ease of retention, and ability of recall; it makes for economy of time and mental energy; it simpli- fies the processes of mental assimilation; it teaches the student, indirectly but effectively, to think sequentially. We have all suffered too keenly, as auditors and readers, the inconveniences of poor organization, not to realize the worth of proper organization of knowledge in teaching. Organization of knowledge has become a pedagogical slogan, but its increase in popularity has not been accom- panied by increased clearness of comprehension of its meaning. What, then, is meant by proper organization? It must ever be borne in mind that proper organization is a relative condition, the limits of which are determined by the capacities of the students and the nature of the sub- ject matter. What is effective organization of facts in ele- mentary history may be very ineffective organization for students of high school or college grade. Making due allowance for relative conditions, good organization may be said to consist of five essential characteristics. Logical sequence is the first of these. It is apparent that the more rational the sequence of facts, the more effective is the organization of knowledge. Data organized on a basis of cause and effect, similarity, contrast or any other logical relationship will help to secure the teaching advan- tages we have mentioned. A search for this simple prin- ciple in most textbooks on American or English history or literature reveals its complete absence. A detailed mass of historical information grouped into administrations or reigns is merely a mechanical organization in which time, effective teaching 64 College Teaching Meaning of organization of subject matter the accidental element, and not the development of social movements, the logic of human history, is the detei'mining factor. In too many courses in literature the student learns names of writers, biographical data, and literary character- istics of the masters, but fails to see the development of the movement of which the writer was a part. Events of his- tory placed in their social movements, writers in literature placed in the school in which they belong, give the student the logical ties which bind the knowledge to him. So, too, one often analyzes the sequence of chapters in an advanced algebra or a trigonometry and fails to discover the govern- ing rationale. It must be remembered, however, that the nature of the subject will often reduce the logical element, in its organization. Instances in language teaching may be cited as illustrations of teaching situations where a mechani- cal organization is often the only one possible because of the arbitrary character of the subject matter. Relativity of importance is the second factor of good organization. A cursory study of a well-organized chapter or merely passing attention to a well-organized lecture reveals at once a distinct difference in the emphasis on the various parts or elements of the subject. The proportional allotment of time or space, the number of illustrations, the number of questions asked on a given point, the force of language — these are all means of bringing out the rela- tive importance of constituent topics or principles. In retrospect, a well-organized lesson presents an appearance similar to a contour map; each part stands out in distinc- tive color according to its significance. It is frequently argued by teachers that students of college age should be required to distinguish the relativ- ity of importance of the parts of a lesson or the topics in a subject; that the instructor who points out the chang- ing importance of each succeeding part of a lesson is en- ervating the student by doing for him what he oiight to do for himself. This is true in part, but it must be realized that the instructor who through questions and directed dis- cussions leads students to formulate for themselves the rela- General Principles of College Teaching 65 live importance of data is not only carrying out the sugges- tion made in the preceding paragraph but is also develop- ing in his students a power they too frequently lack. Those who have studied the notes that students take in their classes have seen how frequently facts are torn from their moor- ings; how wrong principles are derived from illustrations; how a catch-phrase becomes a basic principle; how simple truths and axioms are distorted in the frenzy of note taking. Through questions if possible, through emphasis on illus- trations and explanations, where no other means is available, students must be made to see that all facts of a subject are not of the same hue, that some are faint of tint, others in shadow, and still others in high colors. Without this rela- tivity of importance, facts are grouped; with it, they are intelligently organized. An underlying tendency can be discerned in well-organ- ized knowledge. Not only are facts arranged in logical sequence and emphasized according to importance, but there is in addition a central principle or an underlying purpose giving unifying force to them all. We can illus- trate the need of this third characteristic of good organi- zation by referring to a college course in American history which gives much time to the period from 1815 to 1860. The events of these forty-five years are not taught in administrations but are summed up in six national tenden- cies; viz., the questions of state sovereignty, slavery, terri- torial acquisition, tariff, industrial and transportational progress, and foreign policy. Each of these movements is treated as intensively as time permits. At the end of the study of the entire period, the student is left with these six topics but without a unifying principle; to him, these are six unrelated currents of events. In each of these prob- lems the North and the South displayed distinctive atti- tudes, acted from distinctive motives, expressed distinctive needs and preferences, but these were never brought out either through well-formulated questions or through expla- nation. As a result, the class never realize fully that those years, 1815-1860, marked the period of growing sectional QQ College Teaching differences, misunderstandings, and animosities. Had this underlying tendency been brought out clearly at various points in the course, the students would have carried away a permanent impression of what is most vital in this period of American development. Gradation of subject matter is another characteristic of good organization. Careful gradation is not so vital in subjects of social content as it is in mathematics, foreign languages, and exact sciences. The most important single factor in removing difficulties that beset a student is grada- tion. Teaching problems often arise because the instructor or the textbook presents more than one difficulty at a time. Teachers who lack intellectual sympathy or who are so lost in the advanced stages of their specialty that they can no longer image the successive steps of difficulty, one by one, that present themselves to a mind inexperienced in their respective fields, are frequently guilty of this pedagogical error. Malgradation of subject matter is the direct cause of serious loss of time and energy and of needless dis- couragement not only to students but to instructors as well. Ability of the student to summarize easily is a test of good organization. At the end of a loosely organized chap- ter or lesson the student experiences no little difficulty in setting forth the underlying principles and their supporting data. It does not help much to have the textbook or the instructor state the summary either at the end of the lesson in question or at the beginning of the succeeding one. The summary of a lesson, given by the class, is a test of the effectiveness of instruction. Summaries given by teachers or textbooks have little or no pedagogical justification. Only in cases where the summary introduces a new point of view or unifying principles, or when it sets forth basic principles in particularly forceful language — only then is the statement by teacher or textbook justifiable. Thorough- Teachers are advised to be thorough in their instruction. They in turn urge their students to strive for thoroughness in study. We praise or impugn the scholarship of our col- leagues because it possesses or lacks thoroughness. Here ness General Principles of College Teaching 67 we have a quality of knowledge universally extolled. But what is meant by thoroughness? How can teachers or students know that they are attaining that degree of com- prehension known as thoroughness? We are told that thor- oughness is a relative condition, always changing with accompanying circumstances. Even an unattainable ideal can be defined, — why not thoroughness? We must, there- fore, attempt to determine the meaning of thoroughness as used in teaching and study. It may be helpful to formulate the common or lay inter- Negative in- pretation of thoroughness. The term " thoroughness " is ofthorougS- erroneously used in a quantitative sense to describe scholastic ^ess attainment. We are told of a colleague's thoroughness in history; he knows all names, dates, places, facts in the development of mankind; his knowledge of his specialty is encyclopedic; " there is no need of looking things up when he is around." A professor of English literature boasted of the thoroughness with which he teaches Hamlet: " Every word of value and every change in the form of versification are marked; every allusion is taken up, every peculiar gram- matical construction is brought to the attention of the class." Here we have illustrations of an erroneous conception of thoroughness which gives it an extensive meaning and re- gards it as the accumulation of a mass of data. Yet the master of chronological detail in history may have no historical imagination, no historical perspective, no his- torical judgment. He may possess the facts, but a period in history still remains for him a stretch of time limited by two dates, rather than a succession of years in which all mankind seems to be moving in the same direction, possessed of the same viewpoints, the same hopes and aspirations. The professor of English literature does not see that in teaching Hamlet he forsook his specialty, literature, for philology and mythology; that he turned his back on art and took up language structure. Thoroughness is not com- pleteness, because the possession of the details of a subject does not necessarily bring with it a true comprehension of it. Add all the details, and the sum total is nothing more 68 College Teaching Positive in- terpretation of thorough- ness than the group of details. Thoroughness is a degree of com- prehension resulting from the acquisition of new points of view. The teacher of history who sees underlying forces in the facts of the past, who understands that true inwardness of any movement which shows him its relation to all phases of life, but who nevertheless may not have ready command of all the specific details, is more thorough in his scholar- ship. He has the things that count; the facts that are for- gotten can easily be found. The class that studies the dramatic structure of Hamlet, that sees Shakespeare's power of character portrayal, that takes up only such grammatical and language points as give clearer comprehension or lead to greater appreciation of diction, is thorough although it does not possess all the facts. It is thorough because what is significant and dynamic in' Hamlet is made focal. The postgraduate student assiduously searching for data for his doctorate thesis is often guided by the erroneous conception of thoroughness; he wants facts that have never seen the light. The more he gets of these, the nearer he approaches his goal. He avoids conclusions; he is counseled by his pro- fessors against giving too much of his book to the expression of his views. Analyze the chapters of a doctorate thesis and note the number of pages given to facts and those to conclusions and interpretations. The proportion is aston- ishing. The student's power to find facts is clearly shown; his power to use facts is not revealed by his thesis. The richer the thesis is in detail, in references, in allusions to dusty tomes and original sources, the more thorough is it fre- quently considered by the faculty. We have failed to realize that this excessive zeal in gathering and collating a large num- ber of not commonly known facts may make the thesis more cumbersome, more complete, but not necessarily more thor- ough. However, the plea for a new standard in judging doc- torate theses is meeting with gratifying encouragement. What, then, are the teaching practices that make for greater thoroughness, that increase the qualitative and inten- sive character of knowledge? We shall discuss some of these in the succeeding paragraphs. General Principles of College Teaching 69 The acquisition of new points of view makes for in- How can creased thoroughness of comprehension. The class that ness be understands the causes of the American Revolution from the produced? American point of view knows of the navigation laws, the quartering of soldiers in American homes, the Stamp Act, the Boston Massacre, — the usual provocations that strained patience to the breaking point. The college teacher of American history who spends time on the riots in New York in which a greater number of colonists was killed than in Boston, who teaches in detail the various acts forbidding the manufacture of hats and of iron ware, or the protests against English practices in the colonies made by British merchants, etc., is adding more facts, but he may only be intensifying the erroneous conclusion tha-t the students have formed in earlier and less complete courses. The topic, " Causes of the American Revolution," grows in thoroughness, not through the addition of these facts but through the presen- tation of new interpretations of the practices of the English. When we explain that the English believed in virtual and not actual representation, the students see a new mean- ing in " taxation without representation." When the students learn that the English government decided on a new economic and industrial policy which planned to have the mother country specialize in manufacture and trans- portation and the colonies in production of raw materials, the students see reason, though not necessarily justice, in the acts prohibiting Americans from various forms of manu- facture and transportational activities. These new facts modify in the minds of students the point of view so often given in elementary courses, that the War for Independence was caused by sheer British meanness and injustice, by her policy of reckless repression. It is not always possible to give new points of view to all knowledge in all subjects. There are cases in which there is only one point of view or where students may not be ready for a new interpretation because of their limited mastery of a new field of knowledge. Under these condi- tions an added point of view is a source of confusion rather 70 College Teaching than an aid to clearer comprehension. Some subjects, like the social sciences, naturally allow for richer interpretations. Others, like the languages and the physical sciences, pre- sent only very limited opportunities; in the biological sciences the possibilities, though not as rich as in the social sciences, are numerous and productive of good results. Comparison is a second means of producing thoroughness of comprehension. Good teaching abounds in comparisons which are introduced at the end of every important topic rather than reserved for examination questions. Compari- sons used liberally at every logical pause in the develop- ment of a subject always give an added viewpoint, review early subject matter incidentally, stir thought, and make for better organization. How much more clearly are the causes of the War of 1812 understood after they are com- pared with those that brought on the Revolutionary War! How much more definite are the causes of the American Revolution when compared with those that brought on the French Revolution! A writer, a school, or a movement in English literature may be understood when studied by itself; but how is comprehension deepened when each is compared with another writer or school or movement! Comparison of perception and conception or appreciation and association in psychology, makes each activity stand out clearer in the mind of the student. Compare the laws of rent, wage, profit, and interest in economics, and not only each is better under- stood but the basic laws of distribution are readily derived by the student. Similarly, comparisons in mathematics, physics, chemistry, and the entire range of collegiate sub- jects give increased comprehension, useful though inci- dental reviews, and greater unification of knowledge, as well as added points of view. Correlation as a means of producing thoroughness is closely allied to comparison. Correlation relates kindred topics of different subjects, while comparison points out relations in the same subject. The instructor who corre- lates the history of education with the political and eco- nomic history that the student learned in another course is General Principles of College Teacliing 71 unifying related experience, reducing the field of knowledge, introducing logical organization, and adding new interpre- tations to facts already acquired. Similarly, teaching must be enriched by correlating physics and mathematics, chem- istry and physics, literature and music, history of literature and general history, until instruction has taken advantage of every vital relation among subjects. With the growth of specialized subjects there is an unfortunate tendency: toward isolation until the untrained mind looks upon the curriculum as a series of unrelated experiences, each rival- ing the other in its claim to importance. The advantage of correlation will remain lost in college teaching as long as each instructor regards himself as a specialized investigator concerned with teaching his subject rather than his students. How many college teachers know what subjects their students have already taken, or knowing the names of these subjects, have a general knowledge of their content? The college professor of the preceding gen- eration was a cultured gentleman whose general scholarship transcended the limits of his specialty. He understood and knew the curriculum as a whole. Because of changes in every phase of our civilization, his successor has a deeper but a narrower knowledge. He knows little of the work of his students outside of his own subject. He does not relate and correlate the ever growing field of knowledge; he merely adds — by the introduction of his own mass of facts — to the isolation which characterizes the parts of college cur- ricula. This tendency must be counteracted, not by inter- fering with the scholastic interests of any instructor, but by occasional conferences of instructors of allied subjects in order to agree on common meeting grounds, on points of correlation, on useful repetitions, and on the elimination of needless duplications. Such pedagogical conferences are rare because college teachers are not alive to the need of reform in methods of college teaching. Thoroughness results from increase in the number of ap- plications of knowledge. The introduction of the functional view into teaching brings with it a realization of the vital 72 College Teaching Teaching as a process of arousing self-activity needs of increased ways of applying the experience we pre- sent to students. As the laws of physics, mathematics, biol- ogy, composition, economics, etc., are applied to a number of specific instances, the generalization grows in meaning an(l in force. Specific cases vary, and, varying, give new color and new meaning to the laws that are applied to ex- plain them. How much a law in chemistry means after it is applied to specific instances in industry, human and animal physiology, plant life, or engineering! The equation learned in descriptive geometry may be under- stood, but it never means so much as when it is applied to specific problems in engineering. Applications give added insight into knowledge and therefore make for greater thoroughness of comprehension. Locke's Blank Paper Theory, enunciated centuries ago, has been repeatedly and triumphantly refuted even by tyros in psychology, but in educational practices it continues to hold sway. College teaching too frequently proceeds on the assumption that the mind is an aching void anxiously await- ing the generous contributions of knowledge to be made by the teacher. College examinations usually test for multi- plicity of facts acquired, rather than for power developed. College teaching usually does not perceive that the mind is a reacting machine containing a vast amount of pent-up potential energy which is ready to react upon any presen- tation; that development takes place only as this self- activity expresses itself; that education is evolutionary rather than involutionary. Teaching is, therefore, a process of arousing, sustaining, and directing the self-activity of pupils. The more persistently and successfully this activity is aroused, the more systematically it is directed to intelligent ends, the more skillful is the teaching. Teachers do not impart knowledge, for that is impossible; they occasion knowledge. Only as the teacher succeeds through ques- tions, directions, diagrams, and all known devices, in arous- ing the self-activity of the student, is he producing the conditions under which knowledge is acquired by the pupil. General Principles of College Teaching 73 The methods commonly used in college teaching are Evaluation of commo methods i teaching r_n_,,,^. of common as follows: methods of 1. Lecture method, with or without quiz sections. 2. Development method, with or without textbook. 3. Combination of lecture and development method. 4. Reference readings and the presentation of papers by students. 5. Laboratory work by students, together with lectures and quiz sections. Teachers have long debated the relative merits of these methods or combinations of them. They fail to realize that each method is correct, depending upon the aim to be accom- plished and the governing circumstances. No method has a monopoly of pedagogical wisdom; no method, used exclusively, is free from inherent weakness. A teaching method must be judged by its ability to arouse and sustain self-activity and to attain the aim set for a specific lesson. With this standard for judging a method of teaching, we must stop to sum up the relative worth of common methods of college teaching. The lecture method has been the target for much criti- Lecture cism for many centuries. Socrates inveighed against its evaluated use by the sophists, and educators since have repeated the attack. The reasons are legion: (a) The lecture method tends to discourage the pupil's activity. The student feels no responsibility during the lecture; he listens leisurely, and makes notes of the instructor's contribution. The student's judgment is not called into play; he learns to take knowledge on the authority of the instructor. The sense of comfort and security experienced in a lecture hour is fatal even to aggressive and assertive minds. Sooner or later the students succumb to the inertia developed by the lecture system. (6) A second limitation of an exclusive lecture method is its inability to make permanent impressions. Many a student, entering the lecture hall, has completely forgotten 74 College Teaching even the theme of the last lecture. Knowledge is retained only when it is obtained by the expression of self-activity. To offset this weakness notes must be taken, but these prove to be the bane of the lecture method. Some students, in their efforts to record a point just concluded, lose not only the thought of what they are trying to write but also the new thought which the instructor is now explaining; they drop both ideas from their notes and wait for the next step in the development of the lecture. This accounts for the many gaps in the notes kept by students. Some instruc- tors, dismayed by the amount of knowledge lost by students, resort to dictation devices. Others, realizing the pedagog- ical weakness of such teaching, distribute mimeographed outlines of carefully prepared summaries of the lectures. Now the student is relieved of the tedium of note taking, but the temptation to let his mind wander afield is intensi- fied. An outline, scanty of detail, but so devised as to keep the organization and sequence of subject matter clear in the minds of students, is, of course, helpful. But detailed out- lines distributed among the students discourage even at- tentive listening. (c) In teaching by lectures only there is no contact between student and teacher. The student does not recite; he does not reveal his type of mind, his mode of study, his grasp of subject matter. He is merely a passive recipient. To this third weakness of the lecture method we may add a fourth: id) it tends to emphasize quantity rather than method. The student is confronted with a great mass of facts, but he does not acquire a mode of thought nor does he see the method by which a given sub- ject is developed, (e) The lecture method, therefore, inculcates in students an attitude of mental subservience which is fatal for the development of courageous and vigorous thought. And finally (/) it must be urged that in lecture teaching the instructor is not testing the accuracy of the students' conceptions nor is he able to judge the efficacy of his own methods. But, on the other hand, it must be admitted that with General Principles of College Teaching 75 an effective lecturer, possessed of commanding person- ality, the lecture gives a point of view of a subject and an enthusiasm for it which other devices fail to achieve. The lecture method makes for economy of time and en- ables one to present his subject to his class with a succinct- ness absent from many textbooks. Where much must be taught in a limited time, where a comprehensive view of an extensive field must be given, when certain types of responses or mental attitudes are desired, the lecture serves well. Experience teaches that an exclusive lecture svstem is ^^"^^ ^o^*^^ of l6ctur6 not conducive to efficient work; that lectures to regular method classes ought to be punctuated by questions whenever in- terest lags; that the occasional and even the unan- nounced lecture is more effective; that supplementary de- vices for checking up assignments and regular collateral study are of vital importance. Where regular lectures are followed by detailed analyses in quiz sections the best re- sults are obtained when the lecturer himself is the questioner. Where quiz sections are turned over to assistants, wise procedure requires that quiz leaders attend the lectures and decide, in conference with the lecturer, the specific aims which must be achieved in the quiz work and the assigned readings which must be given to students in preparation for each quiz hour. Unless this is done, the student is frequently confused by the divergent points of view presented by lecturer, quiz master, and textbook. The development method has much to commend it. It stimulates activity by its repeated questions. Few or no notes are taken. There is constant contact with the student. At every point the mental content of the pupils is revealed. The teacher sees the result of his teaching by the intelligence of successive responses. The pupil is being trained in systematic thought and in concentration. But it must be remembered that the development method is often costly in time because answers may be wrong or irrelevant. It may encourage wandering; a student's reply reveals ignorance of a basic principle, and the aim 76 College Teaching Place of reference reading in college teaching Evaluation of develop- ment — So- cratic or heuristic method of the lesson is often forgotten in the eagerness to patch up this misconception. Then, too, in subject matter that is arbitrary, as in descriptive and narrative history, no development is possible. In such cases the questions are designed to test the student's knowledge of the text, and the lesson becomes a quiz rather than a development. It is plain, therefore, that a judicious combination of the lecture and development methods will give better re- sults than the exclusive use of either one. The analysis of the pedagogical advantages of each leads to the con- clusion that the development method should predominate and that the lecture method should be used sparingly and always with some of the checking devices described. A common method employed in advanced courses in college subjects emphasizes reference study and research. The entire course is reduced to a series of problems, each of which deals with a vital aspect of the subject. Each student is made responsible for a topic. The initial hours are devoted to an examination of the common sources of information in this specific subject, the modes of using these, the standards to be attained in writing a paper on one of the topics, and similar matters. The remainder of the term is given over to seminar work: each student reads his paper and holds himself in readiness to answer all questions his classmates may ask on his topic. The aims of such a course are obviously to develop a knowledge of sources and an ability to use intelligently the unorganized data found by the student. The results of these pseudo- seminar courses are far from what was anticipated. A thorough investigation of such a course will soon con- vince the teacher that the seminar method, whatever its merits in university training, must be refined and diluted before it is applied to college teaching. Let us see why. Successful reference reading requires a knowledge of the field studied, maturity of mind, discriminating judgment in the selection of material, and ability in organization. The university student is not only maturer and more serious but has a basis of broader knowledge than most under- General Principles of College Teaching 77 graduates. Without this equipment of mental powers and knowledge, the student cannot judge the merits .of contend- ing views nor harmonize seeming discrepancies. A student who has no ample foundation of economics cannot study the subject by reference reading on the problems of economics. To learn the meaning of value he would read the psychological explanations of the Austrian schools and the materialistic conceptions of the classical writers. He would then find himself in a state of confusion, owing to what seemed to him to be a superfluity , of explanations of value. When one understands one point of view, an added viewpoint is a source of greater clarity and a means of deeper understanding. But when one is entirely ignorant of fundamental concepts, two points of view presented simultaneously become two sources of confusion. In the university only the student of tried worth is per- mitted to take a seminar course. In the upper classes in college, mediocre students are often welcomed into a seminar course in order to help float an unpromising elec- tive. The college seminar is usually unsuccessful because Limitations few students have ability to hold the attention of their method in classmates for a period of thirty minutes or more. >^i^der- Language limitations, lack of a knowledge of subject teaching matter, inability to illustrate eff^ectively, and the skeptical attitude of fellow students all militate against successful teaching by a member of the class. Students presenting papers often select unimportant details or give too many details. The rest of the class listen languidly, take oc- casional notes, and ask a few perfunctory questions to help bring the session to a close. A successful hour is rare. The student who prepared the topic of the day undoubt- edly is benefited, but those who listen acquire little knowl- edge and less power. The course ends without a compre- hensive view of the entire subject, without that knowledge which comes from the teacher's leadership and instruction. This type of reference reading and research has value when used as an occasional ten or fifteen minute exercise to 78 College Teaching supplement certain aspects of class work. But as a steady diet in a college course, the seminar usually leaves much to be desired. The laboratory method is growing in favor today in college teaching. It is employed in the social sciences, in sociology, in economics, in psychology, in education, as well as in the physical and the biological sciences. Where it is followed the aim is clearly twofold; viz., to teach the method by which the specific subject is growing and to develop in the students mental power and a scientific attitude towards knowledge. Value of Lgl^ ug illustrate these two aims of the laboratorv method, laboratory k ^ ^ - ^ • i • i • i method A laboratory course in chemistry or biology or sociology may be designed to teach the student the use of apparatus and equipment necessary for work in a respective field; the method of attacking a problem; a standard for dis- tinguishing significant from immaterial data; methods of gathering facts; the modes of keeping scientific records,- — in a word, the essence of the experience of successive gen- erations of investigators and contributors. But no success- ful laboratory results can be obtained without a proper mental attitude. The student must learn how to prevent his mental prepossessions or his desires from coloring his observations; to allow for controls and variables; to give most exacting care to every detail that may influence his result; to regard every conclusion as a tentative hypothesis subject to verification or modification in the light of further test. Unless the student acquires a knowledge of the method of science and has achieved these necessary modes of thought, his laboratory course has failed to make its most significant contribution. In courses where the aim is to teach socially necessary information or to give a comprehensive view of the scope of a specific subject, it is obvious that the laboratory method will lead far afield. It is for this reason that introductory courses given in recitations, with demonstra- tions by instructors, and occasional lecture and laboratory hours, are more liberalizing in their influence upon the General Principles of College Teaching 79 beginners than courses that are primarily laboratory in character. Most laboratory courses would enhance their usefulness Cautions in by observing a few primary pedagogical maxims. The Jhe iTborL first of these counsels that we establish most clearly the to^y method distinctive aim of the course. The instructor must be sure that he has no quantitative aim to attain but is occupied rather with the problems of teaching the method of his specialty. Second, an earnest effort must be made to acquaint the students with the general aim of the entire course as well as with the specific aim of each laboratory exercise. The students must be made to realize that they are not discovering new principles but that by rediscovering old knowledge or testing the validity of well-established truths they are developing not only the technique of in- vestigational work, but also a set of useful mental habits. Much in laboratory work seems needless to the student who does not perceive the goal which every task strives to attain. A third requisite for successful laboratory work re- quires so careful a gradation that every type of problem peculiar to a subject is made to arise in the succession of exercises. It is wise at times to set a trap for students so that they may learn through the consequences of error. For this reason students may be permitted to leap to a conclusion, to generalize from insufficient data, to neglect controls, to overlook disturbing factors, etc. An improperly planned and poorly graded laboratory course repeats exercises that involve the same problems and omits situations that give training in attacking and solving new problems. Effective laboratory courses afford opportunity to students to repeat those exercises in which they failed badly. If each exercise in the course is designed to make a specific contribution to the development of the student, it is obvious that merely marking the student zero for a badly executed experiment is not meeting the situation. He must in addition be given the opportunity to repeat the 80 College Teaching The college teacher not the univer- sity pro- fessor experiment in order to derive the necessary variety of experiences from his laboratory training. And, finally, the character of the test that concludes a laboratory course must be considered. The test must be governed by the same underlying aims that determine the entire course. It must seek to reveal, not the mastery of facts, but growth in power. It must measure what the student can do rather than what he knows. A properly organized test serves to reinforce in the minds of students the aims of the entire course. An analysis of effective teaching is necessarily incom- plete that does not give due consideration to the only human factor in the teaching process — the teacher. We have too long repeated the old adages: "he who knows can teach"; "a teacher is born, not made"; "experience is the teacher of teachers." These dicta are all tried and true, but they have the failings common to platitudes. It often happens that those who know but lack in imagina- tion and sympathy are by that very knowing rendered unfit to teach. " Knowing " so well, they cannot see the diffi- culties that beset the learner's path, and they have little patience with the student's slow and measured steps in the very beginnings of their specialty. It is true that some are born teachers, but our educational institutions could not be maintained if classes were turned over only to those to whom nature had given lavishly of pedagogical power. Experience teaches even teachers, but the price paid must be computed in terms of the welfare of the student. Teaching is one of the arts in which the artist works only with living material; yet college authorities still make no demand of professional training and apprenticeship as prerequisites for admission to the fraternity of teaching artists. Ineffective college teaching will not improve until pro- fessional teaching standards are set up by respected in- stitutions. The college teacher must be possessed of ample scholarship of a general nature. He must have expertness in his specialty, to give him a knowledge of his field, General Principles of College Teaching 81 its problems and its methods. He must be a constant student, so that his scholarship in his specialty will win recognition and respect. But part of his preparation must be given over to professional training for teaching. With- out this, the prospective teacher may not know until it is too late that his deficiencies of personality unfit him for teaching. With it, he shortens his term of novitiate and acquires his experience under expert guidance. The plan of college-teacher training, given by Dr. Mezes in Chapter II, so complete in scope, so thoroughly sound and progres- sive in character, is here suggested as a type of professional preparation now sorely needed. The usual test of teacher and student is still the tradi- Testing the ITQSIllfiS of tional examination, with its many questions and sub-ques- instruction tions. We still measure the results of instruction by fathoming the fund of information our students carry away. But these traditional examinations test for what is temporary and accidental. Facts known today are for- gotten tomorrow. The professor himself often comes to class armed with notes, but he persists in setting up, as a test of the growth of his students, their retentivity of the facts he gave from these very notes. In the final analysis, these examinations are not tests. The writer does not urge the abolition of examinations, but argues rather for a re- organized examination that embodies new standards. A real examination must test for what is permanent and vital; it must measure the degree to which students approximate the aims that were set up to govern the entire course; it must gauge the mental habits, the growth in power, rather than facts. Part of an examination in mathematics, should test students' ability to attack new problems, to plan a line of work, to think mathematically, to avoid typical fallacies of thought. For this part of the test, books may be opened and references consulted. In literature we may question on text not discussed in class to ascertain the students' power of appreciation or of literary criticism. So, too, in examinations in social sciences, physical sciences, foreign languages, and biological sciences, the examination must 82 College Teaching consist, in great measure, of questions which test the acquisition of the habits of thought, of work, of laboratory procedure — in a word, the permanent contribution of any study. This part of an examination should be differ- entiated from the more mechanical and memory questions which seek to reveal the student's mastery of those facts of a subject which may be regarded as socially necessary. Reduce the socially necessary data of any subject to an absolute minimum and frame questions on it demand- ing no such slovenly standard — sixty per cent — as now prevails in college examinations. If the facts called for on an examination are really the most vital in the sub- ject, the passing grade should be very high. If the ques- tions seek to elicit insignificant or minor information, any passing mark is too high. It is obvious, therefore, that a student should receive two marks in most subjects, — one that rates power and another that rates mere acquisition of facts. The passing grade in the one would necessarily be lower than in the other. An examination is justified only when it is so devised that it reveals not only the students' stock of socially useful knowledge but also their growth in mental power. Paul Klapper College of the City of New York PART TWO The Sciences CHAPTER IV The Teaching of Biology T. W. Galloway V The Teaching of Chemistry Louis Kahlenberg VI The Teaching of Physics Harvey B. Lemon VII The Teaching of Geology T. C. Chamherlin VIII The Teaching of Mathematics G. A. Miller IX Physical Education in the College Thomas A. Storey IV THE TEACHING OF BIOLOGY Biology and Education THE life sciences, broadly conceived, are basal to all de- Biology the partments of knowledge; and the study of bi6logy \^^&iT illumines every field of human interest. To the believer knowing in evolution the human body, brain, senses, intellect, sen- sations, impulses, habits, ideas, knowledges, ideals, standards, attractions, sympathies, combinations, organiza- tions, institutions, and all other powers and possessions of every kind and degree are merely crowning phenomena of life itself. The languages, history, science, economic sys- tems, philosophies, and literatures of mankind are only special manifestations and expressions of life and a part, therefore, of the studies by which we as living beings are trying to appraise and appreciate the meaning of life and of the universe of which life is the most significant product. Life is not merely the most notable product of our universe ; it is the most persuasive key for solving the riddle of the universe, and is the only universe product which aspires to interpret the processes by which it has reached its own pres- ent level. All knowledge, then, is biological in the very vital sense that the living organism is the only knowing thing. The knowing process is a life process. Even when knowledge pertains to non-living objects, therefore, it is one-half bio- logical; our most worth-while knowledge — that of our- selves and other organisms — is wholly so. Because all our knowledge is colored by the life process, of which the knowing process is derivative, the study of life under- lies every science and its applications, every art and its practice, every philosophy and its interpretations. Biol- ogy must be taught in sympathy with the whole joint enterprise of living and of learning. 85 86 College Teaching Adaptation without los- ing adapta- bility the goal of life and of education The most outstanding phenomenon of life is the adapta- tion of living things to the real and significant conditions of their existence. Furthermore, as these conditions are noi static, particularly in the case of humans, organisms must not merely be adapted, but must continue thereafter to be adaptable. Now learning is only a special case under living, and education a special case under life. Its pur- poses are the purposes of life. It is an artificial and rapid recapitulation for the individual, in method and results, of past life itself. The purpose of education is " adap- tation, — with the retention of adaptability." It is to bring the individual into attunement, through his own responses and growth, with all the real factors, external and internal, in his life, — material, intellectual, emotional, social, and spiritual, — and at the same time leave him plastic. Adaptation comes through the habit-forming experiences of stimulus and response. The very process of adaptation, therefore, tends toward fixity and to destroy adaptability. It is thus the task of education, as it is of life, to replace the native, inexperienced and physiological plasticity of youth with some product of experience which shall be able to revise habits in the interest of new situations. The adapt- ability of the experienced person must be psychical and acquired. It must be in the realm of appreciation, atti- tude, choice, self-direction — a realm superior to habit. In this human task of securing adaptation and retaining adaptiveness the life sciences have high rank. In addi- tion to furnishing the very conception itself that we have been trying to phrase, they give illustrations of all the his- toric occasions, kinds, and modes of adaptation; in lacking the exactness of the mathematical and physical sciences they furnish precisely the degree of uncertainty and open- ness of opportunity and of mental state which the act of living itself demands. In other words the science of life is, if properly presented, the most normal possible intro- duction to the very practical art of living. Because of the parallel meaning of education and life in securing progres- sive adaptation to the essential influential forces of the uni- The Teaching of Biology 87 verse, an appreciative study of biology introduces directly to the purposes and methods of human education. Chief Aims of Biology as a College Subject While students differ in the details of their purposes in Why study life, all must learn to make the broad adjustments to the coiiegJ?^" physical conditions of life; to the problems of food and nutrition; to other organisms, helpful and hurtful; to the internal impulses, tendencies, and appetites; to the various necessary human contacts and relations; to the great body of knowledge important to life, which human beings have got together; to the prevailing philosophical interpreta- tions of the universe and of life; and to the pragmatic or- ganizations, conventions, and controls which human society has instituted. In addition to these, some students of biol- ogy are going into various careers, each demanding special adjustments which biology may aid notably. Such are medicine and its related specialties, professional agricul- tural courses,- and biological research of all kinds. An extended examination of college catalogs shows some consciousness of these facts on the part of teachers of biology. The following needs are formally recognized in the prospectuses: (1) The disciplinary and cultural needs of the general student; (2) the needs of those preparing for medicine or 'other professional courses; and (3) the needs of the people proposing to specialize in botany and zoology. These aims are usually mentioned in the order given here; but an examination of the character of the courses often reveals the fact that the actual organization of the department is determined by an exact reversal of this order, — that most of the attention is given, even in the beginning courses, to the task of preparing students to take advanced work in the subject. The theory of the depart- ments is usually better than their practice. In what follows these are the underlying assumptions, — which seem without need of argument: (1) The gen- eral human needs should have the first place in organizing 88 College Teaching the courses in biology; (2) the introductory courses should not be constructed primarily as the first round in the ladder of biological or professional specialization, but for the gen- eral purposes of human life; (3) the preparation needed by teachers of biology for secondary schools is more nearly like that needful for the general student than that suited to the specialist in the subject; and (4) the later courses may more and more be concerned with the special ends of professional and vocational preparation. (1) study of biology furnishes knowledge of adaptive value General Aims of Biology in Education What are the general adaptive contributions of biology to human nature? What are the results in the individual which biology should aim to bring to every student? There are four classes of personal possessions, important in human adaptation, to which biology ministers in a con- spicuous way: information and knowledge; ability and skills; habits; and attitudes, appreciations, and ideals. These four universal aims of education are doubtless closely related and actually inseparable, but it is worth while to consider them apart for the sake of clearness. A. TYPES OF BIOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE USEFUL IN THE ADAPTATION OF HUMAN BEINGS TO THE MOST IMPORTANT CONDITIONS OF THEIR LIFE (1) Some knowledge of the processes by which indi- vidual plants and animals grow and differentiate, through nutrition and activity; of the process of development com- mon to all organisms; and the bearing of these facts on human life, health, and conduct. (2) An outline knowledge of reproduction in plants and animals; the origin, nature, meaning, and results of sex; the contribution of sex to human life, to social organization and ideals, and its importance in determining behavior and controls. (3) A good knowledge of the external forces most im- portant in influencing life; of the nature of the influence; The Teaching of Biology 89 of the various ways in which organisms respond and become adjusted individually and racially to these conditions. A sense of the necessity of adaptation; of the working of the laws of cause and effect among living things, as every- where else; of the fact that nature's laws cannot be safely ignored by man any more than by the lower organisms; of the relation between animal behavior and human be- havior. (4) Equally a true conception of the known facts about the internal tendencies in organisms including man, which we call hereditary. The principles underlying plant, ani- mal, and human breeding. Any progress in behavior, in legislation, or in public opinion in the field of eugenics, negative or positive, must come from the spread of such knowledge. (5) A knowledge of the numerous ways in which plants and animals contribute to or interfere with human welfare. This includes use for food, clothing, and labor saving; their destruction of other plants or animals useful or hurt- ful to us; their work in producing, spreading, or aiding in the cure of disease; their aesthetic service and inspiration; the aid they give us in learning of our own nature through the experiments we conduct upon them; and many miscellaneous services. (6) A conception of the evolutionary series of plants and animals, and of man's place in the series; a reassurance that man's high place as an intellectual and emotional being is in no way put in peril by his being a part of the series. Some clear knowledge of the general manner of the development of the plant and animal kingdoms to their present complexity should be gained. The student should have some acquaintance with the great generalizations that have meant so much to the science and to all human think- ing, should understand how they were reached and the main classes of facts on which they are based. (7) The general student should be required to have such knowledge of structure and classification as is needed to give foundation and body to the evolutionary conceptions 90 College Teaching (2) Biologi- cal study gives desir- a1}le skills of plants and animals, and to the various processes and powers mentioned above — and only so much. (8) Some knowledge of the development of the science itself; of its relation to the other sciences; of the men who have most contributed to it, and their contributions; of the manner of making these discoveries, and of the bearing of the more important of these discoveries upon human learning, progress, and well-being. (9) Something of the parallelism between animal psy- chology, behavior, habits, instincts, and learning, and those of man, — in both the individual and the social realm. (10) An elementary understanding of plant and animal and human distribution over the earth, and of the factors that have brought it about. B. FORMS OF SKILL WHICH WORK IN BIOLOGY SHOULD BRING TO EVERY STUDENT Skill or ability may be developed in respect to the following activities: seeking and securing information, recording it, interpreting its significance, reaching general conclusions about it, modifying one's conduct under the guidance of these conclusions, and, finally, of appraising the soundness of this conduct in the light of the results of it. All of these are of basic importance in the human task of making conscious adjustments in actual life; and the ability to get facts and to use them is more valuable than to possess the knowledge of facts. Other sciences develop some of these forms of skill better than biology does; nevertheless, we shall find that biology furnishes a remarkably balanced opportunity to develop skills of the various kinds. It pre- sents a great range and variety of opportunity to develop accuracy and skill in raising questions; in observation and the use of precise descriptive terms in recording results of observation; in experimentation; in comparison and classi- fication. It is peculiarly rich in opportunities to gain skill in discriminating between important and unimportant data, — one of the most vital of all the steps in the process of sound reasoning. In practice, a datum may at first sight The Teaching of Biology 91 seem trivial, when in reality it is very significant. Skill in estimating values comes only with experience in esti- mating values, and in applying these estimates in practice, and in observing and correcting the results of practice. Finally, skill in adjusting behavior to knowledge is one of the most necessary abilities and most difficult to attain. The study of animal behavior experimentally is at the foundation of much that we know of human psychology and the grounds of human behavior. Even in an elemen- tary class it is quite possible so to study animal responses and the results of response as to give guidance and facility to the individual in interpreting the efficiency of his own responses, and in adding to his own controls. As has been said, practice of some kind is necessary to determine whether our estimate of values is good. Even vicarious experience has educative value. C. HABITS WHICH MAY BE STRENGTHENED BY THE WORK IN BIOLOGY Habits are of course the normal outcome of repeated <^^ ^l^^Y action. Indeed, skills are in a sense habits from another adaptive point of view. Skill, however, looks rather toward the ^*^^*^ output; habit, toward the mode of functioning by the per- son by whom the result is attained. We may then de- velop habits in respect to all the processes and activities mentioned above under the term " skills." The tedcher of biology should have definitely in purpose the securing for the student of habits of inquiry, of diligence, of con- centration, of accuracy of observation, of seeking and weighing evidence, of detecting the essentials in a mass of facts, of refusing to rest satisfied until a conclusion, the most tenable in the light of all known data, is reached, and of reexamining conclusions whenever new evidence is offered. Of course it is impossible to use biology to get habits of right reasoning in students unless we really allow them to reason. If we insist that their work is merely to observe, record, and hold in memory, — as so many of us do in 92 College Teaching laboratory work, — they may form habits of doing these things, but not necessarily any more than this. Indeed, they may definitely form the habit of doing only these things, failing to use the results in forming for themselves any of the larger conclusions about organisms. Seeing and knowing — without the ability and habit of thinking — is not an uncommon or surprising result of our conventional laboratory work. There is only one way to get the habit of right " following through " in reasoning; this is, always to do the thing. When data are observed or are furnished it is a pedagogical sin on the part of the teacher to allow the student to stop at that point; and equally so to deduce the conclusion for the student, or to allow the writer of the textbook to do so, or at any time to induce the student to accept from another a conclusion which he himself might reach from the data. We have depended too much on our science as a mere observational science, — when as a matter of fact its chief glory is really its opportunity and its incentives to coherent thinking and careful testing of con- clusions. It is inexact enough, if we are entirely honest, to force us to hold our conclusions with an open mind ready to admit new evidence. It is entirely the fault of the teacher if the pupil gets a dogmatic, too-sure habit of mind as the result of his biological studies. And yet, as has been said, it is exact enough to enable us to reach just the same sort of approximations to truth which are possible in our own lives. The study of biology presents a superb opportunity to prepare for living by forming the habits of mind and of life that facilitate right choices in the presence of highly debatable situations. In this it much surpasses the more " exact " sciences. We may conclude, then, by positing the belief that the most important mental habit which human beings can form is that of using and applying consciously the scientific method as outlined above, not merely to biol- ogy alone, but to all the issues of personal life as well. The Teaching of Biology 93 D. APPRECIATIONS, ATTITUDES, AND IDEALS AS AIDED BY BIOLOGY This group of objectives is a bit less tangible, as some (4) Atti- think, than those that have been mentioned; but in my J"^®^ °^ ' , , ' •' life per- own opinion they are as important and as educable for the fected by good of the youth by means of biology as are knowledge, \^^ Sciences skill, and habit. In a sense these states of mind arise as by-products of the getting of information, skills, and habits; in turn they heighten their value. We have spoken above of the need of skill and habit in making use of the various steps in the scientific method in reaching conclusions in life. These are essential, but skill and habit alone are not enough to meet the necessities in actual life. In the first place the habit of using the scientific method in the scientific laboratory does not in itself give assurance that the person will apply this method in getting at the truth in problems in his own personal life; and yet this is the essential object of all this scientific training. In order to get the individual to carry over this method, — especially where feelings and prejudices are involved, — we must inculcate in him the scientific ideal and the scien- tific attitude until they become general in their influence. To do this he ought to be induced as a regular part of his early courses in biology to practice the scientific method upon certain practical daily decisions exactly with the same rigor that is used in the biological laboratory. The custom of using this method in animal study should be trans- formed into an attitude of dependence upon it as the only sound method of solving one's life choices. Only by carry- ing the method consciously into our life's problems, as a part of the exercise in the course in biology, can we break up the disposition to regard the method as good merely in the bio- logical laboratory. We must generate, by practice and pre- cept, the ideal of making universal our dependence upon our best instrument of determining truth. A personal habit in the laboratory must become a general ideal for life, if we hope to substitute the scientific method for prejudice 94 College Teaching (5) Biology a valuable tool for certain technical pursuits in human living. There is no department of learning so well capable of doing this thing as biology. In the second place, the scientific method standing alone, because of its very excellence as a method, is liable to pro- duce a kind of over-sure dogmatism about conclusions, un- less it be accompanied by the scientific attitude or spirit of open-mindedness. The scientific spirit does not necessarily flow from the scientific method at all, unless the teacher is careful in his use of it in teaching. We make a mistake if, in our just enthusiasm to impress the scientific method upon the student, we fail to teach that it can give, at best, only an approximation to truth. The scientific attitude which holds even our best-supported conclusions subject to revision by new evidence is the normal corrective of the possible dog- matism that comes from over-confidence in the scientific method as our best means of discovering truth. The student at the end of the first year of biology ought to have more appreciation and enjoyment of plants and animals and their life than at the beginning, — and in- creased appreciation of his own relation to other animals; some attitude of dependence upon the scientific method of procedure not merely in biology but in his own life; a desire, however modest, for investigating things for himself; and an ideal of open-minded, enthusiastic willingness to subject his own conclusions to renewed testing at all times. All these gains should be reinforced by later courses. Special Aims of Biology in Education So far as I can see, the preparation of students for medicine, for biological research, or for any advanced ap- plication of biology calls only for the following, — in addi- tion to the further intensification of the emphasis suggested above: (a) An increased recognition of the subject matter in organizing the course. In the early courses the subject ought to be subordinated to the personal elements. If one is to relate himself to the science in a professional way, the logic of the science comes to be the dominant objective. The Teaching of Biology 95 (6) Growing out of the above there comes to be a change of emphasis on the scientific method. The method itself is identical, but the attitude toward it is different. In the early courses it was guided by the teaching purpose. We insist upon the method in order that the student may ap- preciate how the subject has grown, may realize how all truth must be reached, and may come habitually to apply the method to his life problems. In the later courses it becomes the method of research into the unknown. The student comes more and more to use it as a tool, in whose use he himself is subordinated to his devotion to a field of investigation. (c) A greater emphasis upon such special forms of biological knowledge as will be necessary as tools in the succeeding steps, and the selection of sul3Ject matter with this specifically in view. This is chiefly a matter of infor- mation, making the next steps intellectually possible. id) More specific forms of skill, adapted to the work contemplated. Technic becomes an object in such courses. Morphology, histology, technic, exact experimentation, repetition, drill, extended comparative studies, classifi- tion, and the like become more essential than in the ele- mentary courses. Thoroughness and mastery are desiderata for the sake both of subject matter and character; and in very much greater degree than in the general course. Organization of the Course in Biology The writer does not feel that standardized programs in biology in colleges are either possible or desirable. What is set down here under this heading is merely intended as carrying out the principles outlined above, and not as the only way to provide a suitable program. The writer assumes that the undergraduates are handled by men of catholic interests; and that the undergraduate courses are not distributed and manipulated primarily as feeders for specialized departments of research in a graduate school. This latter attitude is, in my opinion, fatal to creditable Biology- courses not to be stand- ardized, rigidly 96 College Teaching But they should follow a general principle: (1) The first group of courses should intro- duce to life rather than to later bio- logical courses undergraduate instruction for the general student or for the future high school teachers of the subject. There are three groups or cycles of courses which may properly be developed by the college or by the undergrad- uate department of the university. First Group This group contains introductory courses for all students, but organized particularly with the idea of bringing the rich material of biology to the service of young people with the aim of making them effective in life, and not as a first course for making them botanists or zoologists. Course — Biology 1. General Biology This course should introduce the student to the college method of work in the life sciences; should give him the general knowledge and points of view outlined above as the chief aims of Biology; should synthesize what the student already knows about plants and animals under the general conception of life. Ideally the botanical and zoological portions should be fused and be given by one teacher, rather than presented as one semester of botany and one of zool- ogy. This, however, is frequently impracticable. In any event the total result should really be biology, and not a patchwork of botany and zoology. Hence there should be a free crossing of the barriers in use of materials at all times. A year of biology is recommended because each pupil ought to have some work in both fields, and we cannot ex- pect him to take a year in each. Course — Biology 2. History of Biology This course, dealing with the relation of the development of biology to human interests and problems, may be given separately, or as a part of Course I, — which should other- wise be prerequisite to it. This may be one of the most humanizing of all the possible courses in biology. The Teaching of Biology 97 sional uses Second Group This group furnishes a series of courses providing a ^^^^g^'^^'jj thorough introduction to the principles and methods of be technical botany and zoology. They provide discipline, drill, com- ductory^'^to parison, mastery of technic as well as increased appreciation profes- of biology and of the scientific method. They should pre- pare for advanced work in biology, and for technical appli- cations of it to medicine, agriculture, stock breeding, for- estry, etc. Course — Zoology 1 : Gen- eral and Comparative Zo- ology. Course — Zoology 2 : Ani- mal, including Human, Physiology. Course — Zoology 3: Mi- crotechnic, Histology, Histogenesis, Embryogeny. Course — Zoology 4: Ani- mal Ecology. This outline for botany and zoology follows in the main the most common arrangement found in the schools of the country. In the personal judgment of the writer all under- graduate courses should combine aspects of morphology, physiology, ecology, etc., rather than be confined strictly to one particular phase; even histology and embryology can be better taught when their physiological aspects are emphasized. There is no fundamental reason, however, why there may not be great latitude of treatment in this group. An alluring feature of biological teaching is that a teacher who has a vital objective can begin anywhere in our wonderful subject and get logically to any point he wishes. These courses may be further subdivided, where facilities allow. Third Group This group contains certain of the more elementary ap- plications of biology to human welfare. While having Course — Botany 1 : Gen- eral and Comparative Bot- any, and the Evolution of Plants. Course — Botany 2: Physi- ology and Ecology of Plants. Course — Botany 3 : Plant Cytology, Histology, and Embryology. 98 College Teaching (3) A third group of special, but cultural, courses The first course ought to he given in such a way that It might fittingly be required of all freshmen practical value in somewhat specialized vocations, the courses in this group are not proposed as professional or technical. They are definitely cultural. Every college might well give one or more of them, in accordance with local conditions. They ought to be eligible without the courses of the second group. The order is not significant. Biology 3: Economic Entomology; Biology 4: Bird Course; Biology 5: Tree Course; Biology 6: Bacteriology and Fermentation; Biology 7: Biology of Sex; Heredity and Eugenics; Biology 8: Biology and Education; Biology 9: Evolution and Theoretical Problems. Place of Biology in the College Curriculum The introductory course (Biology 1) can be given in such a way that it ought to be required of all students during the freshman or sophomore year, preferably the freshman. In addition to the life value suggested above, and its introductory value in later biology courses, such a course would aid the student in psychology, sociology, geology, ethics, philosophy, education, domestic economy, and physical culture. Effort should be made to correlate the biological work with these departments of instruction. The course as now given in most of our colleges and universities does not possess enough merit to become a required study. Perhaps all we have a right at present to ask is that biology shall be one of a group of sciences from which all students must elect at least one. It is pre- posterous, in an age of science, that any college should not require at least a year of science. Biology 1 should be prerequisite for botany 1 and zoology 1, and for the special biology courses in group three. Botany 1 and zoology 1 should be made prerequisite for the higher courses in their respective fields; but aside from this almost any sequence would be allowable. The Teaching of Biology 99 A major in biology should provide at least for biology 1 and 2, botany 1, zoology 1, botany 2 and 3, or zoology, 2 and 3. Chemistry is desirable as a preparation for the second group of courses. Methods of Teaching as Conditioned by the Aims Outlined Above Since the laboratory method came into use among biol- ^^"^^^^^^ ogists, there has been a disposition, growing out of its very retarded by excellences, to make a fetich of it, to refuse to recognize the p^^ P^^a- necessity of other methods, to be intolerant of any science courses not employing the laboratory, and to affect a lofty disdain of any pedagogical discussion of the ques- tion whatsoever. The tone in which all this is done sug- gests a boast; but to the discriminating it amounts to a confession! The result of it has been to retard the de- velopment of biology to its rightful place as one of the most foundational and catholic of all educational fields. The great variety of aim and of matter not merely allow, but make imperative, the use of all possible methods; and there is no method found fruitful in education which does not lend itself to use in biology. The lecture method, the textbook, the recitation, the quiz and the inverted quiz, the method of assigned readings and reports, the method of conference and seminar, the laboratory method, and the field method are all applicable and needed in every course, even the most elementary. Our method has thus crystallized about the laboratory as Pro^stitution the one essential thing; but worse, we have used the very laboratory shortcomings of the laboratory as an excuse for extending its sway. The laboratory method is the method of research in biology. It is our only way to discover, unknown facts. Is it, therefore, the best way to rediscover facts? This does not necessarily follow, though we have assumed it. Self-discovered facts are no better nor more true than com- municated facts, and it takes more time to get them. The laboratory is the slowest possible way of getting facts. tory work 100 College Teaching We have tried to correct this quantitative difl&culty by ex- tending the laboratory time, by speeding up, by confining ourselves to static types of facts like those of structure, and by using detailed laboratory guides for matter and method, all of which tends to make the laboratory exer- cise one of routine and the mere observation and record- ing of facts or a verification of the statements in manuals. The correction of these well-known limitations of the laboratory must come, in my opinion, by a frank recog- nition of, and breaking away from, certain of our mis- apprehensions about the function of the laboratory. Some of these are: Real pur- 1. That the chief facts of a science should be rediscovered possibmty ^y ^^ student in the laboratory. This is not true. Life of ^abora- is too short. The great mass of the student's facts must come from the instructor and from books. The laboratory has as its function in respect to facts, some very vital things: as, making clear certain classes of facts which the student cannot visualize without concrete demonstration; giving vividness to facts in general; gaining of enough facts at first hand to enable him to hold in solution the great mass of facts which he must take second hand; to give him skill and accuracy in observation and in record- ing discoveries; to give appreciation of the way in which all the second-hand facts have been reached; to give taste and enthusiasm for asking questions and confidence and persistence in finding answers for them. Anything more than this is waste of time. These results are not gained by mere quantity of work, but only through constant and intelligent guidance of the student's attitude in the process of dealing with facts. 2. A feeling that the laboratory or scientific method con- sists primarily of observation of facts and their record. In reality these are three great steps instead of one in this method, which the student of biology should master: (1) the getting of facts, one device for doing which is observation; (2) the appraisal and discriinination of these facts to find which are important; and (3) the drawing The Teaching of Biology 101 of the conclusions which these facts seem to warrant. There are two practical corollaries of this truth. One is that the laboratory should be so administered that the pupil shall appreciate the full scope of the scientific method, its tremendous historic value to the race, and the necessity of using all the steps of it faithfully in all future progress as well as in the sound solution of our individual prob- lems and the guidance of conduct. The second is that we may make errors in our scientific conclusions and in life conclusions, through failure to discriminate among our facts, quite as fatally as through lack of facts. Indeed, my personal conviction is that more failures are due to lack of discrimination than to lack of observation. The power to weigh evidence is at least as important as the power to collect it. 3. A disposition to deny the student the right to reach conclusions in the laboratory, — or, as we flamboyantly say, to " generalize." Now in reality the only earthly value of facts is to get truth, — that is, conclusions or general- izations. To deny this privilege is taxation without repre- sentation in respect to personality. The purpose of the laboratory is to enable students to think, to think accu- rately and with purpose, to reach their own conclusions. The getting of facts by observation is only a minor detail. In reality, the data the student can get from books are much more reliable than his own observations are likely to be. Our laboratory training should add gradually to the accu- racy of his observations, but particularly it should enable him to use his own and other persons' facts conjointly, and with proper discrimination, in reaching conclusions. To do other than this tends to abort the reasoning atti- tude and power, and teaches the pupil to stand passive in the presence of facts and to divorce facts and conclu- sions. The fear is, of course, that the students will get wrong conclusions and acquire the habit of jumping pre- maturely to generalizations. But this situation, while criti- cal, is the very glory of the method. What we want to do is to ask them continually, — wherever possible, — where 102 College Teaching their facts seem to lead them. Their conclusions are liable to be quite wrong, to be sure. But our province as teachers is to see that the facts ignorance of which made this conclusion wrong are brought to" their attention, — and it is not absolutely material whether they discover these facts themselves or some one else does. What we want to compass is practice in reaching conclusions, and the recognition of the necessity of getting and discriminating facts in doing so, together with a realization that there are probably many other facts which we have not dis- covered that would modify our conclusions. This keeps the mind open. In other words, the student may thus be brought to realize the meaning of the " working hypoth- esis " and the method of approximation to truth. It makes no difference if one " jumps to a conclusion," if he jumps in the light of all his known facts and holds his conclusion tentatively. It is much better to reach wrong conclusions through inadequate facts than to have the mind come to a standstill in the presence of facts. Instead of being a threat, reaching a wrong conclusion gives us the opportunity to train students in holding their conclusions open-mindedly and subject to revision through new facts. Reaching wrong or partial conclusions and correcting them may be made even more educative than reaching right ones at the outset. This would not be true if the conclusion were being sought for the sake of the science. But it is being sought solely for the sake of the student. The distinction is important. The inability to make it is one of the reasons why research men so often fail as teachers. All through life the student will be forced to draw con- clusions from two types of facts, — both of which will be incomplete: those he himself has observed and those which came to him from other observers. While he must always feel free to try out any and all facts for himself, it is quite as important in practice that he be able to weigh other persons' facts discriminatingly. We teach in the laboratory that the pupil should not take his facts second hand, though we rather insist that he do so with his con- The Teaching of Biology 103 elusions. In reality it is often much better to take our facts second hand; the stultifying thing is to take our con- clusions so. 4. The dependence upon outlines and manuals. This is one of the most deadening devices that we have insti- tuted to economize gray matter and increase the quantity of laboratory records at the expense of real initiative and thinking. It is easy for the reader to analyze for him- self the mental reaction, or lack of it, of the student in fol- lowing the usual detailed laboratory outline. Every lahora- ^J^J^f tory exercise should he an educative situation calling for a mental re- complete mental reaction from the pupil. In the first place, ^^^^ no exercise should be used which is not really vital and laboratory educative. This assured, the full mental reaction of the student should be about as follows: (1) The cursory survey of the situation. (2) The raising by the student of such questions as seem to him interesting or worthy of solution. (Here, of course, the teacher can by skillful questioning lead the class to raise all necessary problems, and increase the student's willingness to attack them.) (3) The determination through class conference of the order and method of attacking the problems, and the reasons therefor. (4) The accumulation and record of discovered facts (sharply eliminating all inferences). (5) The arrangement (classification) and appraisal (dis- crimination) of the discovered facts. (6) Conclusions or inferences from the facts. (These should be very sharply and critically examined by teacher and class, to see to what extent they are really valid and supported by the facts.) (7) Retesting of conclusions by new facts submitted by class, by teacher, or from books, with an effort to dimin- ish prejudice as a factor in conclusions, and to increase the willingness to approach our own conclusions with an open mind. 104 College Teaching When laboratory outlines are used at all they should con- sist merely of directions, and suggestions, and stimulating questions which will start the pupils on the main quest, — the raising and solving of their own problems. Some Moot Problems ^ Ascending or descending order? Morphology versus other interests 1. Shall we begin with the simple, little-known, lower forms and follow the ascending order, which is analogous at least to the evolutionary order? Or shall we begin with the more complex but better-known forms and go down- ward? It seems to the writer that the former method has the advantage in actual interest; in its suggestiveness of evolution, which is the most important single impression the student will get from his course; and in the mental satisfactions that come to pupil and teacher alike from the sense of progress. However, our material is so rich, so interesting, and so plastic that it makes little difference where we begin if only we have a clear idea of what we want to accomplish. 2. What proportion of time should be given to mor- phology in relation to other interests? For several reasons morphology has been overemphasized. It lends itself to the older conception of the laboratory as a place to ob- serve and record facts. It offers little temptation to reach conclusions. It calls for little use of gray matter. This makes it an easy laboratory enterprise. It is what the grade teachers call " busy " work, and can be multiplied indefinitely. It can be made to smack of exactness and thoroughness. Furthermore, morphology is in reality a basal considera- tion. It is a legitimate part of an introductory course, — but never for its own sake nor to prepare for higher courses. But morphology is, however, only the starting point for the higher mental processes by which different forms of organisms are compared, for the correlating of structure with activity, for appreciation of adaptations of 1 These problems relate particularly to the introductory courses. The Teaching of Biology 105 structure both to function and to environmental influence. It thus serves as a foundation upon which to build con- clusions about really vital matters. Experience teaches that sensitiveness, behavior, and other activities and powers and processes interest young people more than structure. The student's views are essentially sound at this point. The introductory course should, therefore, be a cycle in which the student passes quite freely back and forth between form, powers, activities, conditions of life, and the conclusions as to the meanings of these. It is important only that he shall know with which consideration he is from time to time engaged. 3. Shall a few forms be studied thoroughly, or many Few types forms be studied more superficially? There is something ° °^^"y- of value in each of these practices. It is possible to over- emphasize the idea of thoroughness in the introductory courses. Thoroughness is purely a relative condition any- way, since we cannot really master any type. It seems poor pedagogy, in an elementary class particularly, to emphasize small and difficult forms or organs because they demand more painstaking and skill on the part of the student. My own practice in the elementary course is to have a very few specially favorable forms studied with a good deal of care, and a much larger number studied par- tially, emphasizing those points which they illustrate very effectively. 4. What proportion of time should be given to the various Distribution rt