' A 
 
 Book _: oLLJLJL 
 
 j 0$ 
 
60th Congress, \ SENATE. (Document 
 
 1st Session. j* J No. 504. 
 
 • r 
 
 CERTAIN INJUNCTION AND LABOR CASES. 
 
 
 Mr. Culberson presented the following 
 
 PAPERS RELATING TO CERTAIN INJUNCTION AND LABOR CASES. 
 
 May 21, 1908.— Ordered to be printed. 
 
 INJUNCTION. 
 
 In the superior court of Cook County. 
 
 State of Illinois, 
 
 Cook County, ss: 
 A. R. Barnes & Co. et al. v. Typographical Union No. 16 et al. 
 Gen. No. 24801 1 . Term No. 2648. 
 
 The People of the State of Illinois, 
 
 To Chicago Typographical Union, No. 16; Edwin R. Wright, who 
 is its president; Thomas P. McCooey, who is its vice-president; John C. 
 Harding, who is its organizer; William McEvoy, who is its secretary 
 
 and treasurer; F. M. Cruikshank, who is its serge ant- at- arms ; 
 
 Davis and Thompson, who are members of the executive 
 
 committee of said union; Edward E. Besette, A. F. Oltroge, R. W. 
 McLaughlin, J. G. Ruggles, J. J. Benes, J. P. McBurney, B. F. Jones, 
 L. Lesser, E. Lange, Charles J. Sward, William R. Schanowski, 
 M. Richmond, J. Deutelbaum, Henry Hanselman, Thomas A. Ish- 
 mond, F. J. Anderson, John McKee, Robert J. Brown, Ed. Kelly, 
 F. P. Smith, William Meissner, C. E. Anderson, H. H. Bagnall, H. P. 
 Philbin, W. J. Smyth, Louis G. Semons, George R. Lowrey, J. E. 
 Bellew, George L. Gray, W. C. Kelly, P. J. Farrell, Eugene Adams, 
 Henry Koch, Harry McCurdy, Joseph Krai, George Webber, William 
 
 Brown, J. Deitz, O'Connell, C. E. Curtis, George Thomas, 
 
 Frank Segabeth, George Hopkins, Tom Cuddy, Joe Barton, W. E. 
 Kelley, F. C. S. Brown, Frank Mullaney, Edward Mullaney, W. 
 Caspers, T. A. Trippito, W. R. Cozatt, Ulysses G. Ward, Andrew 
 Brennan, Henry J. Sommers, Ed. Hepner, John J. Marton, Albert 
 Rodig, J. M. Splan, A. Haynes, W. Gray, Charles Leiding, Charles 
 Holyoke, Joe Huster, H. Harriss, F. Kollertz, George Gardner, Fred 
 C. Klein Co., Hack & Anderson, and Sleepeck-Helman Printing Co., 
 defendants, and to your attorneys, solicitors, agents, and servants, 
 
2 CERTAIN INJUNCTION AND LABOR CASES. 
 
 and to any and all poisons assisting, aiding, abetting, or confederating 
 with you, and to each and every of them, greeting: 
 
 Whereas it hath been represented to the Honorable Jesse Holdom, 
 one of the judges of the superior court of Cook County, in the State 
 aforesaid, on the part of x\..R. Barnes & Co., Toby Rubovits, Poole 
 Brother-, Rogers <fe Co., R. R. Donnelley & Sons Co., M. A. 
 Donohue & Co., Faithora Printing Company, The Franklin Company, 
 W. F. Hall Printing Company, M. A. Fountain & Company, Marshall- 
 Jackson Co., Rogers & Smith Co., C. il. Morgan & Co., Rand, McNally 
 & Co., Marsh, Aiken & Curtis Co., Stearns Bros. & Co., Wagner & 
 Hanson Co., Chicago Label and Box Co., P. F. Pettibone & Co., and 
 Stevens, Maloney & Co., complainants, in their certain bill of com- 
 plaint exhibited before said judge and filed in said court against you, 
 the said above-named defendants, among other things, that you are 
 combining and confederating with others to injure the complainants 
 touching the matters set forth in said bill, and that your actings and 
 doings in the premises are contrary to equity and good conscience. 
 And the said judge having ordered that a writ of injunction issue 
 out of said court according to the prayer of said bill, and the com- 
 plainants having given bond as required by said order, we therefore, 
 in consideration thereof, and of the particular matters in said bill 
 set forth, do strictly command you, the said above-named defendants, 
 and your confederates and the servants and agents of each of you 
 and any and all persons assisting, aiding, and abetting you or any 
 of you, now or hereafter, or confederating or acting in concert with 
 you or any of you, that you do absolutely desist and refrain — 
 
 From in any manner interfering with, hindering, obstructing, or 
 stopping the business of said complainants, or any of them, or of 
 their agents, servants, or employees, in the operation of the business 
 of said complainants, respectively; 
 
 From picketing or maintaining at or near the premises of said 
 complainants, or any of them, any picket or pickets; 
 
 From assaulting or intimidating b} 7 threats or otherwise the em- 
 ployees of any of said complainants, or any person who may become 
 or seek to become employees of said complainants, or either of them; 
 
 From congregating about or near the places of business of any of 
 said complainants, or about or near any place where their emplo3*ees 
 are lodged or boarded, for the purpose of compelling, inducing, or 
 soliciting the employees of any of said complainants to leave their 
 service or to refuse to work for them, or an}" of them, or for the pur- 
 pose of preventing or attempting to prevent any person from freely 
 entering into the service of any of said complainants; 
 
 From interfering with or attempting to hinder complainants, or 
 &iiy of them, in carrying on their business in the usual and ordinary 
 way; 
 
 From following the employees of any of said complainants to then- 
 homes or other places or calling upon them, for the purpose of induc- 
 ing them to leave the employ of said complainants, or of molesting 
 or intimidating them or their families; 
 
 From attempting b} T bribery, payment or promise of money, oilers 
 of transportation, or other rewards, to induce the employees of any 
 of said complainants to leave their service; 
 
 From organizing or maintaining any boycott against said com- 
 plainants, or any of them; 
 
 JUN 3 
 
 ft ot £ a 
 
4. 
 
 CERTAIN" INJUNCTION AND LABOR CASES. 3 
 
 From attempting to induce customers or other persons to abstain 
 from working for or accepting work from said complainants, or any of 
 them; 
 
 From attempting to prevent, by threats of injury or by threats of 
 calling strikes, any persons from accepting work from or doing work 
 for such complainants, or any of them; 
 
 From attempting to create or enforce any boycott against any of 
 the employees of the complainants, or any of them, and from attempt- 
 ing to induce people in their neighborhood or elsewhere not to deal 
 with them; 
 
 From sending any circulars or other communications to customers 
 or other persons who might deal or transact business with said com- 
 plainants, or either of them, for the purpose of dissuading such per- 
 sons from so doing, and from doing any other act or thing in further- 
 ance of the conspiracy set forth in said bill, until this honorable court 
 in chancery sitting shall make other orders to the contrary. Hereof 
 fail not, under penalty of what the law directs. 
 
 To the sheriff of said county, to execute and return in due form of 
 law. 
 
 Witness, Charles W. Vail, clerk of said court, and the seal thereof, 
 at Chicago aforesaid, this 11th day of October, A. D. 1905. 
 
 [seal.] Charles W. Vail, Cleric. 
 
 Tenney, Coffeen, Harding & Wilkerson, 
 
 Complainant's solicitors. 
 
 In the district court of Allen County, State of Kansas. 
 
 The United Iron Works Company, a corporation, plaintiff, v. E. Shu- 
 man, Charles Simms, J. A. Beeler, D. E. Fox, A. L. Richards, J. 
 Speath, Ben Haney, A. K. Louis, F. Witt, J. A. Champieux, B. Ross, 
 G. Morgan, J. W. Cason, H. E. Wagner, R. L. Samples, Nay Cruise, 
 Gus Speath, Jesse Wright, Will Smith, W. N. Hornsby, W. E. 
 McConkey, A. S. Long, W. H. Cornegie, and the officers and mem- 
 bers of the Iron Molders 7 Union No. 416, of Iola, Kans., defendants. 
 No. 7355. 
 
 ORDER. 
 
 The application of plaintiff for temporary injunction against defend- 
 ants coming on for hearing before me at chambers at court-house, 
 city of Iola, Allen County, Kans., on July 30, 1906, at 9 a. m., the 
 plaintiff present by McClain & Apt, its attorneys, and defendants 
 present by Travis Morse and George C. Ferguson, their attorneys, the 
 hearing was proceeded with, both parties introduced their evidence, 
 consisting of the verified petition of plaintiff and affidavits, all of 
 which are filed herein; after the introduction of the evidence and 
 arguments of counsel, closing July 31, 1906, 1 took the matter under 
 advisement until August 6, 1906. 
 
 And now August 6, 1906, parties present as before, I, having duly 
 considered the evidence and arguments of counsel, and being fully 
 advised in the premises, do find that the plaintiff is entitled to a tem- 
 porary injunction against the defendants served with process and 
 notice herein. 
 
4 CERTAIN INJUNCTION AND LABOR CASES. 
 
 And it is therefore ordered and directed by me that the defendants, 
 The Iron Molders' Union No. 416, of Iola, Kansas, Charles Simms, 
 J. A. Beeler, D. E. Fox, A. L. Richards, A. K. Louis, F. Witt, J. A. 
 Champieux, R. L. Samples, and George Speath, and each, every and 
 all of them, their agents, servants, representatives, coadjutors, and 
 all persons connected with them, or either of them, or acting by r 
 through or under them, or either of them, from assaulting, menacing, 
 threatening, or intimidating, whether by manner, attitude, speech, 
 numbers or other acts or means, the men and workmen in plaintiff's 
 employ, or who come to plaintiff for employment, and from interfering 
 with said plaintiff's business by any unlawful means for the purpose 
 of preventing any person or persons who now are or may hereafter be 
 in plaintiff's employment from continuing therein, or who, being 
 desirous of entering said employment, from doing so, or continuing 
 therein ; from threatening by the means of force or violence or threats 
 thereof, or by the use of opprobrious epithets or means of intimida- 
 tion, whether upon or near the premises of said complainant or else- 
 where, the employees hired and employed by said complainant in its 
 said shops, or either of them, for the purpose or with the design of 
 intimidating such employees, or forcing them, or any of them, by said 
 means, to quit the service of said complainant; 
 
 From enticing any employee of said plaintiff who may have a defi- 
 nite or fixed contract of employment with said complainant for a 
 definite period, and particularly those employed by said plaintiff to 
 take the place of strikers in its works, to break his or their contracts 
 of employment with such plaintiff by leaving the employment of said 
 complainant before the termination thereof. 
 
 From conspiring, confederating, or combining among themselves, 
 or with other parties to do or accomplish any of the foregoing acts, 
 or to cause the same to be done or accomplished, or to obstruct or im- 
 pede said complainant in the carrying on of its business, or to entice 
 or solicit any other party or parties to do or attempt to accomplish, 
 singly, or in connection with any of the said defendants, any of the 
 foregoing acts hereby or heretofore sought to be restrained or en- 
 joined. 
 
 This order to become operative upon the plaintiffs filing a bond in 
 the sum of $500, with sureties to be approved bj^ the clerk of this 
 court, conditioned as is provided by law, and to continue in force 
 until the final determination of the above-entitled action, unless 
 otherwise ordered by the court or judge thereof. 
 
 The restraining order heretofore granted herein to remain in force 
 for five days from this date, during which time the aforesaid bond of 
 plaintiff to be approved and filed herein; to all of which defendants 
 except. 
 
 Done at chambers at the city of Tola, Allen County. Stale of Kan- 
 sas, this 6th day of August, A. D. 1 906. 
 
 Oscar Foist, Judge. ' 
 
 I, C.E.Adams, clerk of the district court, do hereby certify the 
 above to be a true copy of the original order. 
 
 Witness my hand and the seal of the court aflixed this 9th day of 
 August, 1906. 
 
 [seal.1 C. E. Adams, Clerk. 
 
CERTAIN" INJUNCTION AND LABOR CASES. 5 
 
 Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Essex, ss: 
 
 To United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Car- 
 penters' Union No. 595, Building Trades Council, Lathers' Union 
 No. 99, Painters, Decorators, and Paperhangers' Union No. Ill, 
 Plumbers' Union No. 77, Sheet Metal Workers' Union No. 217, 
 Steam Fitters and Helpers' Union No. 277, George H. E. Davis, 
 J. W. Porter, J. Aylward, T. Nugent, J. W. Cotton, J. E. Moynihan, 
 
 Charles Morris, W. H. Raley, W. F. Perkins, Barry, David 
 
 A. Pratt, Charles Southard, Myron L. Delano, Richard H. Stevens, 
 George H. Murray, Louis Jelley, Frank L. North, Avard Brooks, 
 Joseph A. Smalley, Joseph L. Blaisdell, William H. E. Nichols, 
 Joseph R. Blauvelt, Fred S. Messenger, George King, John Doe, 
 Richard Roe, John D. Cowper, Harry E. Robertson, Herbert 
 Robertson, Charles Pitts, and all servants, agents, attorneys, and 
 councilors, acting for or in behalf of you or either of you, greeting: 
 
 Whereas it has been represented unto us, in our superior court, by 
 Edward T. Reynolds, Melvin A. Dame, Clement T. Dame, L. S. 
 Dame, copartners, doing business under the firm name of M. A. Dame 
 & Son Company; Joseph A. Healy, Oscar Healy, copartners, doing 
 business under the firm name of J. A. Healv & Son; Charles C. Phillips, 
 Frank G. Kelly, William H. Smith, Frank H. Haskell, J. William 
 Haskell, William H. Sutherland, copartners, doing business under 
 the firm name of Haskell & Sutherland; Charles S. Cunningham, 
 Daniel Cunningham, copartners, doing business under the firm name 
 of C. S. Cunningham & Son; John S. Wright, Ralph A. Keyes, J. S. 
 Bethine, Nelson S. Haskell, William F. Murphy, Benjamin I. Foote, 
 Samuel A. Foote, doing business under the firm name of Foote 
 Brothers; Antoine Joyal, Mauritz M. Soldvenberg, William W. Mor- 
 rison, John H. Wells, Charles C. Hutchins, William Stone, James W. 
 Van Blascom, William F. Embree, William H. Embree, George A. 
 Eastman, William Logie, Frank S. Estabrook, William J. Pevear, 
 doing business under the firm name of Estabrook & Pevear; George F. 
 Shattuck, Charles E. Cann, Fred W. Flaken, doing business under the 
 firm name of Cann & Haken; Daniel Rearclon, Archibald T. Sampson, 
 doing business under the firm name and style of Sampson & Allen; 
 Richard J. White, Robert P. Marshall, doing business under the firm 
 name and style of J. Otis Marshall & Son; John E. Elder, Ernest 
 Harnais, Elisha B. Tinkham, John B. Davitt, Charles H. Shattuck, 
 Robert F. Haskell, jr., George R. Sutherland, Nathaniel Belben, 
 Daniel Langille, Joseph G. Fadden, Homer J. Mills, George W. 
 Foster, John A. Swain, C. O. Marshall, complainants, that the said 
 complainants have exhibited a bill of complaint in our said court 
 against you, the said respondents, which said bill is filed in the office 
 of the clerk of our said court at Salem, in and for our said county of 
 Essex, wherein said complainants, among other things, pray for a 
 writ of injunction against you, the said respondents, to restrain you 
 and the persons before named from proceeding to do what you are 
 hereinafter enjoined from doing: 
 
 We therefore, in consideration of the premises, do strictly enjoin and 
 command you, the said respondents, and all and every the persons 
 before named, to desist and refrain from interfering with the com- 
 plainants' business by obstructing, annoying, intimidating, or inter- 
 fering with any person or persons who now are or may hereafter be in 
 
(5 CERTAIN INJUNCTION AND LABOR CASES. 
 
 their employment or desirous of entering the same, or by intimidating, 
 annoying, threatening, hindering, or obstructing any person transact- 
 ing business with the complainants' or desirous of entering into 
 contracts or other business relations with the complainants from trans- 
 acting such business or from entering into such contracts or other 
 business relations, or by intimidating or inducing any person or per- 
 sons to abstain from doing business with the complainants or per- 
 forming contracts which such person or persons may have with the 
 complainants, or by causing or threatening to cause any strike among 
 the employees or persons having business relations with the com- 
 plainants, for the purpose of intimidating or inducing such person or 
 persons to abstain from transacting business with the complainants 
 or performing contracts with the complainants ; or by any scheme or 
 design among themselves or with others organized for the purpose of 
 annoying, hindering, or interfering with the complainants, or any 
 person or persons who now are or may hereafter be in the employment 
 of the complainants or desirous of entering the same from entering 
 it or from continuing therein, or for the purpose of intimidating, 
 annoying, or hindering any person or persons in transacting business 
 with the complainants, or from entering into contracts or other busi- 
 ness relations with the complainants until the further order of our 
 said court, or some justice thereof. 
 
 Witness, Albert Mason, esq., at Salem, the 21st day of May, in the 
 year of our Lord 1906. 
 
 [l. s.] Jas. P. Hale, 
 
 Assistant Cleric. 
 
 A true copy. 
 
 Attest : 
 
 Frank E. Wells, 
 
 Deputy Sheriff. 
 
 Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Essex, ss: 
 
 To Machinists' Union No. 471; J. E. McMahon, Roscoe Hall, J. W. 
 Alexander, W. J. Hirst, C. Shaw, M. J. Valtz, A. J. Waterman, D. 
 Cornier, J. F. Whitten, L. H. Loring, J. J. McCashin, John Tagney, 
 Henry Olsen, Charles Vaughan, William Dean, William T. Breen, 
 
 Hawkins, Lotonis, Vernon Coffin, William J. Casey, 
 
 William B. Brady, John Lawrence, James Hines, Walsh, 
 
 T. Ulmer, T. J. Brodie, JohnDoe, and Richard Roe, and all servants, 
 agents, attorneys, and councilors, acting for or in behalf of you or 
 either of you, greeting: 
 
 Whereas it has been represented unto us, in our superior court, by 
 Boston Machine Works Company, a corporation duly established 
 by law; Thompson Electric Welding Company, a corporation duly 
 established by law; Alexander Stewart; Hammond Stewart, copart- 
 ners doing business under the name and style of Stewart Brothers, 
 William H. Embree, William F. Embree, George W. Eastman, copart- 
 ners doing business under the name and style of William F. Embree 
 & Co., complainants, that the said complainants have exhibited a bill 
 of complaint in our said court against you, the said Machinists' Union 
 No. 471, Machinists' Union No. 604, McMahon, Hall, Alexander, 
 Hirst, Shaw, Valtz, Waterman, Cornier, Whitten, Loring, McCashin, 
 
CERTAIN INJUNCTION AND LABOE CASES. 7 
 
 Tagney, Olsen, Vaughan, Dean, Breen, Hawkins, Lotonis, Coffin, Casey, 
 Brady, Lawrence, Hines, Walsh, Ulmer, Brodie, Doe, and Roe, which 
 said bill is filed in the office of the clerk of our said court at Salem, 
 in and for our said county of Essex, wherein said complainants, 
 among other things, pray for a writ of injunction against you, the 
 said respondents, to restrain you and the persons before named from 
 proceeding to do what you are hereinafter enjoined from doing. 
 
 We therefore, in consideration of the premises, do strictly enjoin and 
 command you, the said respondents, and all and every persons before 
 named to desist and refrain from interfering with the business of the 
 complainants, or any of them, by obstructing, annoying, intimidating, 
 or unlawfully interfering with any person or persons who now are or 
 may hereafter be in their employment or desirous of entering the 
 same ; by intimidating, annoying, threatening, hindering, or obstruct- 
 ing any person transacting business with the complainants, or any of 
 them, or desirous of entering into contracts or other business relations 
 with them from transacting such business, or from entering into such 
 contracts or other business relations; by intimidating or inducing 
 by unlawful means any person or persons to abstain from doing busi- 
 ness with the complainants, or any of them, or performing contracts 
 which such person or persons may have with the complainants, or any 
 of them, by any scheme or design among themselves or with others 
 organized for the purpose of annoying, hindering, or unlawfully inter- 
 fering with the complainants or any person or persons who now are or 
 may hereafter be in the employment of the complainants, or any of 
 them, or desirous of entering the same, from entering it or from con- 
 tinuing therein, or for the purpose of intimidating, annoying, or hin- 
 dering any person or persons in transacting business with the complain- 
 ants, or any of them, or from entering into contracts or other business 
 relations with the complainants, or any of them. 
 
 Witness, John Adams Aiken, esq., at Salem, the 26th day of Novem- 
 ber, in the year of our Lord 1907. 
 
 [l. s.] Jas. P. Hale, Assistant Clerk. 
 
 A true copy. 
 
 Attest : 
 
 Frank I. Wells, Deputy Sheriff. 
 
 State of Michigan, 
 
 The circuit court for the county of Kent — In chancery, ss: 
 
 To Upholsterers' Union No. 26, Grand Rapids, Mich.; Marshall Oster- 
 hout, Percy Smith, Philip Fossel, Henry Hayes, Charles Roh, Chris. 
 Kryger, Irving An way, Jacob Neesley, Oscar Wille, Thos. Rooney, 
 John Stokker, Gerrit Werkema, Henry Mudge, Abraham De Vlieger, 
 Alexander Olson, Henry F. Harris, Elmer E. French, Wm. Wallace, 
 Wm. Kirchoff, Frank Thomas, Arthur Wiseman, Herman Abel, 
 Gustave Abel, J. Zelinski, Charles Dressel, John Lappen, Emil 
 Rebenstich, Lewis Scuiteman, Henry Coon, Frank Gruner, Walter 
 Davis, Bernard Hatch, Bruno Kurze, Charles Putz, Henry Kleiboer, 
 Walter Emmert, Carrol Van Hartesveldt, Charles J. Engle, Henry 
 F. Schram, Jos. Sommer, Gustave Hauffe, Arthur Newhouse, K. 
 Homgsberg, Robert Smith, Wm. C. Dykstra, John Bruggink, 
 James Bruggink, Wm. Fox, Wm. Reynolds, Jacob Broersma, 
 
8 CERTAIN INJUNCTION AND LABOR CASES. 
 
 Henry Baker, John Pell, Albert Haan, Frank Wynant, Peter 
 Weskerke, Edward Van Houten, Oscar Lindell, William Ahrstedt, 
 Martin Quinten, Walter Schultz, Rinvelt Dozema, John Van 
 Leeuven, and to their counselors, attorne3 T s, solicitors, officers, 
 servants, agents, and workmen, and each and every of them, greeting: 
 
 Whereas it has been represented to us, in the said circuit court for 
 the county of Kent, in chancery, on the part of the Century furniture 
 Company, a copartnership composed of John C. Rickenbaugh, David 
 S. Brown, Ralph E. Rickenbaugh, Lillian M. Rickenbaugh, and Rose 
 B. Rickenbaugh, complainants, that the} 7- have exhibited their bill of 
 complaint in our said court against you, the said defendants, praying 
 therein to be relieved touching the matters therein complained of, in 
 which bill it is stated, among other things, that you are combining and 
 confederating with others to injure the said complainants touching 
 the matters set forth in the said bill, and that your actings and doings 
 in the premises are contrary to equity and good conscience, we 
 therefore, in consideration thereof, and of the particular matters in 
 said bill set forth, do hereby, in the name of the people of the State of 
 Michigan, strictly command you, the said defendants, and the persons 
 before mentioned, and each and every of you, under the penalty of 
 $10,000, to be levied of your respective lands, goods, and chattels to 
 our use, that you do absolutely and entirely desist and refrain from 
 visiting or causing other persons to visit the factory and premises 
 occupied by said complainants; and from congregating, loitering, or 
 remaining in the vicinity of said premises for the purpose of intimi- 
 dating, interfering with, or molesting the employees of complainants; 
 and from picketing and patrolling the factory and premises of com- 
 plainants; and from lying in wait for, interfering with, or molesting 
 the employees of complainants, or any persons desiring to become 
 employees of complainants, as they go to and from said factory for 
 the purpose of interfering with the said employees or persons who 
 may desire to enter the employ of complainants; and from following 
 the employees of complainants to their homes and boarding houses, 
 and from standing or loitering about in the vicinity of the homes and 
 boarding houses of the employees of complainants for the purpose of 
 intimidating, interfering with, or molesting such employees of com- 
 plainants; and from using any language, persuasion, or inducement 
 whatever, directly or indirectly, for the purpose of inducing any 
 employee of said complainants to violate or break any contract of 
 employment between himself and complainants; and from attempting 
 by threats or intimidation of any kind or nature to induce any person 
 to leave the employ of complainants, or to refrain from entering the 
 employ of complainants; and from all acts within or without the 
 immediate vicinity of complainants' said factory and premises tending 
 to obstruct complainants in their business; or to intimidate, annoy, or 
 molest any employee of complainants as he approaches, enters, or 
 departs said factory; and from interfering with the free access of 
 employees of complainants or persons desiring to become employees 
 of complainants to said factory and premises, and their places of work, 
 and the free and unmolested return of said employees and prospective 
 employees to their places of business and homes; and from by con- 
 certed action or otherwise doing any act or causing annoyance which 
 will interfere in any manner with the employees of complainants; and 
 
CERTAIN INJUNCTION AND LABOR CASES. 9 
 
 from giving any instructions or orders to committees, associations, or 
 delegates for the performance of any of said acts; and from in any 
 manner whatsoever impeding or interfering with the regular operation 
 or conduct of the business of complainants or the employees now in 
 their employ, or that may hereafter be employed by them, until the 
 further order of this court in the premises. 
 
 Witness, the Hon. Alfred Wolcott, circuit judge, and the seal of our 
 said court at the city of Grand Rapids, in said county, this 23d day of 
 November, A. D. 1903. 
 
 [seal. Conner H. Smith, Register, 
 
 By Ralph A. Mosher, Deputy Register. 
 Ward & Brown, 
 
 Solicitors for Complainants. 
 
 Business address: Grand Rapids, Mich. 
 
 State of Michigan, the circuit court for the county of Jackson, in 
 chancery, in the name of the people of the State of Michigan, 
 to Local No. 449 of the Iron Molders' Union of North America; 
 Alexander McCullogh, F.Krause, whose full first name is unknown, 
 Fred Thorne, Garfield Turner, Albert Barkman, the officers and 
 members of said union, and all other persons, and to their counsel- 
 ors, attorneys, solicitors and agents, and each and every of them 
 greeting : 
 
 Whereas it has been represented to us, in the circuit court for the 
 county of Jackson, in chancery, on the part of the Holton & Weather- 
 wax Company (Ltd.), complainant, that it has lately exhibited its 
 bill of complaint against you the the said Local No. 449 of the Iron 
 Molders' Union of North America, Alexander McCullogh, F. Krause, 
 whose full first name is unknown, Fred Thorne, Garfield Turner, 
 Albert Barkman, the officers and members of said union, and all other 
 persons, defendants, to be relieved, touching the matters therein 
 complained of; in which bill it is stated amongst other things, that 
 you are combining and confederating with others to injure the said 
 complainant touching the matters set forth in the said bill, and that 
 your actings and doings in the premises are contrary to equity and 
 good conscience; we, therefore, in consideration thereof, and of the 
 particular matters in the said bill set forth, do strictly command 
 you, the said Local No. 449 of the Iron Molders' Union of North 
 America, Alexander McCullogh, F. Krause, whose full first name is 
 unknown, Fred Throne, Garfield Turner, Albert Barkman, the 
 officers and members of said union, and all other persons, and the 
 persons before mentioned, and each and every of you, under the 
 penalty of $10,000, to be levied on your lands, goods, and chattels, 
 to our use, that you do absolutely desist and refrain — 
 
 First, from in any manner interfering with the employees of the 
 Holton & Weatherwax Company (Limited) , now in its employ and 
 from in any manner interfering with any person who may desire to 
 enter the employ of said company by the way of threats, personal 
 violence, intimidation, or other unlawful means calculated or intended 
 to prevent such persons from entering or continuing in the employ 
 of said company or calculated or intended to induce such person or 
 persons to leave the employ of said company. 
 
10 CERTAIN INJUNCTION AND LABOR CASES. 
 
 Second, from congregating or loitering about or in the neighborhood 
 of the shops of said Holton & Weather wax Company (Limited), 
 or at other places with intent to interfere with the employees of said 
 company or with the prosecution of its work or to interfere with or 
 intimidate the employees of said company with intent to cause them 
 to leave the employ of said company or to interfere with or obstruct 
 in any manner the business of said company. 
 
 Third, from interfering with the free access of the employees of 
 said company to its premises and places of work and the free return 
 of said employees to their places of business or their homes. 
 
 Fourth, from conspiring or combining together to accomplish any 
 of the above purposes and from giving any directions or orders to 
 committees, individuals, or otherwise for the performance of any 
 such acts or threats hereinbefore enjoined, and from in any manner 
 whatsoever impeding, obstructing, or interfering with the regular 
 operation and conduct of the business of said Holton & Weatherwax 
 Company (Limited), until the further order of this court. 
 
 Witness, the Hon. James A. Parkinson, circuit judge, and the 
 seal of said circuit court at Jackson Citv, this 21st dav of August, 
 A. D. 1906. 
 
 [seal.] Walter A. Cunningham, 
 
 Register. 
 Lyman B. Trumbull, 
 
 Solicitor for Complainant. 
 
 District court, eighth judicial district. 
 
 State of Minnesota, 
 
 County of Lesueur. 
 
 James Quirk Milling Company, plaintiff, against A. L. Tooker, Albert 
 Dvorak, Frank Novotny, Anton Sleise, James Kovar, Ed. Sweeney, 
 Frank Smetana, Harve Driscoll, N. J. Stevens, Charles Slavik, 
 John Maruska, J. R. Tooker, James Novotney, Ed Durgin, Frank 
 Ruzicka, and Ignace Plonshinsky, defendants. 
 
 The order to show cause why a temporary injunction in the above- 
 entitled action should not be issued came on for hearing before the 
 above-named court at the court-house in the city of Shakopee, in said 
 district, on the 15th day of Januar}^, 1907. 
 
 A. J. Edgerton appeared as counsel for the plaintiff in support of 
 said motion; C. D. McCarthy, esq., appeared as counsel for the defend- 
 ants in opposition thereto. 
 
 Upon the complaint of the plaintiff, and certain affidavits in sup- 
 port of his application for a temporary injunction, and upon certain 
 affidavits of the defendants herein, and after fully considering the 
 same, it is hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed: 
 
 That the defendants, their agents, associates, and the employees 
 and all persons acting under them he, and the same are hereby, tem- 
 porarily restrained and commanded to refrain from in any manner 
 interfering with, hindering, or restricting the free use and occupation 
 of the plaintiff of any and all of its property, or premises of every 
 kind and nature, and from entering upon the grounds or premises 
 of the plaintiff for the purpose of interfering with, hindering, or 
 
CERTAIN INJUNCTION AND LABOR CASES. 11 
 
 restricting its business, and from compelling or inducing, or attempt- 
 ing to compel or induce employees of the plaintiff to refuse or fail 
 to perform their duties as such employees, and from compelling or 
 inducing or attempting to compel or induce by threats, intimidation, 
 force, or violence, any of the employees of the plaintiff to leave the 
 service of the plaintiff; and from preventing, or attempting to pre- 
 vent any person or persons, by threats, intimidation, force, or vio- 
 lence, from entering the service of the plaintiff, or preventing by 
 violence, or in any manner of intimidation, any person or persons 
 from going to or upon the premises of the plaintiff, for any lawful 
 purpose whatever, or from aiding, assisting, or abetting any person 
 or persons in doing any of the acts aforesaid, and from congregating 
 near the premises of the plaintiff for the purpose of intimidating its 
 employees, or coercing its employees, or from preventing them from 
 rendering their services for the plaintiff, and from inducing, by 
 intimidation, coercion or threats any employee to leave the employ- 
 ment of the plaintiff, or from attacking, assaulting, threatening, or 
 by the use of abusive language, or in any manner of intimidation, 
 any place within the city of Montgomery, Minn., attempting to pre- 
 vent any of the employees of the plaintiff from continuing in its 
 service, or any person or persons from entering upon the service of 
 the plaintiff, and from going, from entering upon the service of the 
 plaintiff, and from going, either singly or collectively, to the homes of 
 the plaintiff's employees, or an3^ of them, for the purpose of intimi- 
 dating them, or coercing any or all of them to leave the employment 
 of the plaintiff, or from entering the plaintiff's employ, as well from 
 intimidating or threatening in any manner the wives or families 
 of the employees for the purpose of preventing any. employee from 
 remaining in the service of the plaintiff; and you are further com- 
 manded to obey the order of this court as herein contained from 
 and after the date hereof and until the further order of this court 
 herein. 
 
 Dated at Shakopee, Minn., this 15th day of January, A. D. 1907. 
 
 P. W. Morrison, 
 Judge of said Court. 
 
 In the district court of Douglas County, Nebr., fourth judicial 
 
 district. 
 
 At the February term of said court, to wit, on the 1st day of March, 
 1901, the Hon. Charles T. Dickinson, one of the judges, being present 
 and presiding in said court, the following proceedings were had in the 
 case of the Omaha Cooperage Company, plaintiff, v. The Coopers' 
 International Union, No. 10, of South Omaha, Nebr., et al., defendant, 
 as appears of record on folio — , journal 73, of said court: 
 
 The Omaha Cooperage Company, plaintiff, v. The Coopers' Inter- 
 national Union, No. 10, of South Omaha, Nebr., Albert Lutz, George 
 Sterrett, David Hanrahan, William Wyrick, William Davis, Henry 
 Hugenberg, John C. Sliing, Henry Hauflaire, George W. Phay, 
 H. S. Greenslit, P. H. Hanrahan, R.Hinton; Coopers' International 
 Union, No. 10, of South Omaha, Nebr., R. W. Mullen, William 
 Stoddard, William Stoner, H. G. Richardson, William Moye, G. 
 
12 CERTAIN INJUNCTION AND LABOR CASES. 
 
 Gravely, Charles Smith, David Elliott, W. E. Smith, and Albert 
 Smith, defendants. 
 
 ORDER. 
 
 On the application of the plaintiff and for good cause shown it is 
 hereby ordered that the above-named defendants, and each of them, 
 appear before me at court room No. 7 on the 8th day of March, 1901, 
 at 9.30 o'clock a. m., to show cause why temporary injunction should 
 not issue against them and each of them as pra}'ed in said petition, 
 and until the hearing on said application for a temporary- injunction, 
 and until the further order of this court, a temporary restraining order 
 is hereby granted against said defendants and each of them, and all 
 members of said "Union No. 10" and "Union No. 114," and all per- 
 sons acting by, through, or under the orders and directions of said 
 "Union No. 10" and "Union No. 114," their officers or agents, and 
 all persons acting under the order and direction of the defendants 
 herein, or either of them, restraining them as follows: 
 
 1. From in any manner interfering with the employees of the 
 Omaha Cooperage Company now in the employ of the said Omaha 
 Cooperage Company, and from in any manner interfering with any 
 person, by way of threats, personal violence, intimidation, or other 
 unlawful means calculated to prevent or intended to prevent such 
 person from entering the employ of said Omaha Cooperage Company 
 or from continuing in the employ of said Omaha Cooperage Company, 
 or intended to induce such person or persons to leave the employ of 
 said Omaha Cooperage Company. 
 
 2. From interfering, intimidating, or boycotting, by violence, moles- 
 tation, or threatening in any manner the customers of said Omaha 
 Cooperage Company, for the purpose, by means of such interference, 
 intimidation, boycott, or threats, of inducing such person or persons 
 not to deal with or do business with said Omaha Cooperage Company. 
 
 3. From congregating or loitering about or in the neighborhood of 
 the premises of the Omaha Cooperage Company with intent to inter- 
 fere with the employees of said plaintiff or with the prosecution of 
 their work, and to interfere with or intimidate the employees of said 
 plaintiff' with intent to cause them to leave the employment of plain- 
 tiff, or interfere with or obstruct in any manner any of said employees 
 in going to or from the plaintiff's factory. 
 
 4. From interfering with the free access of employees of the plain- 
 tiff to the plaintiff's premises and their place of work and the return 
 of said employees to their places of business or homes. 
 
 5. From giving any directions of orders to committees, associa- 
 tions, or otherwise, for the performance of any such act or threats 
 herein enjoined, and from in any manner impeding, obstructing, or 
 interfering with the regular operation and conduct of the business of 
 the plaintiff. 
 
 It is further ordered that notice of the pendency of plaintiff's appli- 
 cation for a temporary injunction shall be given to each of said 
 defendants five days before said hearing, and that this restraining 
 order shall take effect upon the giving of a good, sufficient bond in the 
 sum of $500 conditioned as required by law. 
 
 Charles T. Dickinson, Judge. 
 
CERTAIN INJUNCTION AND LABOR CASES. 13 
 
 I hereby certify that the bond hereinbefore provided for in the sum 
 of $500 has been filed and approved. 
 
 Frank A. Broadwell, 
 
 Clerk of District Court. 
 
 State of Nebraska, 
 
 Douglas County, ss: 
 I, Frank A. Broadwell, clerk of the district court in and for the said 
 State and county, do hereby certify that I have compared the above 
 order of said court with the original order as it appears of record on 
 folio — , Journal 73, of said court, and that the same is a correct tran- 
 script thereof and the whole of said original order. 
 
 In testimony whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the 
 seal of said court to be affixed at the city of Omaha, this 1st day of 
 March, A. D. 1901. 
 
 Frank A. Broadwell, Cleric. 
 By , Deputy. 
 
 New Jersey, to wit: The State of New Jersey, to Henry Eger, Leo 
 Finnelly, Richard Harrison, Adam Meisinger, Charles Hunkle, 
 George Leary, and The Metal Polishers, Buffers, Platers, Brass 
 Molders, and Brass Workers' Union of North America, their serv- 
 ants, attorneys, and agents, and each and every of them, greeting: 
 
 Whereas it hath been represented to us, in our court of chancery, 
 on the part of the New York Metallic Bedstead Company, complain- 
 ants, that they have lately exhibited their bill of complaint against 
 you, the said Henry Eger, Leo Finnelly, Richard Harrison, Adam 
 Meisinger, Charles Hunkle, George Leary, and The Metal Polishers, 
 Buffers, Platers, Brass Molders, and Brass Workers' Union of North 
 America, defendants, to be relieved touching the matters set forth 
 in the said bill. 
 
 We therefore, in consideration of the premises, and of the par- 
 ticular matters set forth in the said bill, do strictly enjoin and com- 
 mand you, the said Henry Eger, Leo Finnelly, Richard Harrison, 
 Adam Meisinger, Charles Hunkle, George Leary, and The Metal 
 Polishers, Buffers, Platers, Brass Molders and Brass Workers' 
 Union of North America, their servants, attorneys, and agents, and 
 all and every the persons before mentioned, and each and every of 
 of you, under the penalty that may fall thereon, that you and every of 
 you do absolutely desist and refrain from in any manner knowingly 
 and intentionally causing or attempting to cause by threats, intimida- 
 tions, force, violence, or the payment of money, or the promise of the 
 payment of money, or by the furnishing or offer to furnish of railroad 
 or other transportation, inducements, or persuasions, any of the em- 
 
 Eloyees of the complainant to leave the service of the complainant; 
 •om any and all personal molestation of persons willing to be em- 
 ployed by complainant with intent to coerce such persons, to refrain 
 from entering such employment; from addressing against their will 
 persons willing to be employed by complainant, and thereby causing 
 them personal annoyance, with a view to persuade them to refrain 
 from such employment; from loitering or picketing in the streets. near 
 
14 CERTAIN INJUNCTION AND LABOR CASES. 
 
 the factory of the complainant on Pacific avenue, Jersey City, with 
 intent and with the effect to procure the personal molestation and 
 annoyance of persons employed and willing to be employed by com- 
 plainant, with a view to cause persons so employed to quit their em- 
 ployment or persons willing to be employed b}^ complainant to refrain 
 from such employment; from violence, threats of violence, insults, 
 indecent talk, abusive epithets, practiced upon any persons without 
 their consent with intent to coerce them to refrain from entering the 
 employment of complainant or to leave its employment, until you, 
 the said defendants, shall have fully answered the said bill of com- 
 plaint and our said court shall make other order to the contrary. 
 
 Witness his honor, William J. Magie, our chancellor, at Trenton, 
 the 29th day of October, in the year of our Lord 1906. 
 
 [seal.] Vivian M. Lewis, Cleric. 
 
 R. L. Lawrence, 
 David W. McCrea, 
 
 Solicitors. 
 
 In chancery of New Jersey. Between the Standard Silk Company, 
 complainant, and The Silk Loom-Fixers and Twisters' Benefit 
 Association, Local No. 661, United Textile Workers of America, 
 et als., defendants. On bill for injunction. 
 
 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. 
 
 Upon reading the bill of complaint filed in this cause and the affi- 
 davits of Stephen H. Larned, Henry Anner, Adolph Lerch, Fred 
 Smith, William Briggs, Peter Coleman, John H. Brant, Mrs. Annie 
 Apgar, Frank Terinelli, J. Cooper Jones, Henry Wellen, Joseph F. 
 Delcourt, Anna Singafoos, Bersenia Nixon, Laura L. Ries, Bessie 
 Bercaw, and Myrtle Conover thereto annexed, 
 
 It is, on the 13th day of January, 1908, on motion of Smith & 
 Brady, solicitors of the complainant, ordered that the defendants, and 
 each and every of them, the said The Silk Loom-Fixers and Twisters' 
 Benefit Association, Local No. 661, United Textile Workers of Amer- 
 ica, their and each of their officers and agents, Daniel Carey, John 
 Tobin, George H. Edelston, Arthur De Witt, Fannie Bachman, L. 
 Bachman, Mrs. Noll, Jennie Rissmiller, Frank Gill, M. Nussman, 
 Allen Paul, John Fehley, Ed. Tobin, Ella Tobin, Leida Meyner, Jennie 
 Meyner, Augusta Meyner, Laura Glackin, Sadie Glackin, A. Rista, 
 Abe Rosenberry, Miles Gipp, Fred Vogel, Laura Vogel, Mrs. John 
 Tobin, A. Freedman, Sallie Sterner, Joe Stabp, William B. Stabp, 
 Con. Kelle} T , Peter Masco, Thomas O'Brien, Mamie Edelston, Marg. 
 A. Gipp, Nellie Iluff, Fred Deats, Arthur Meyner, Nellie Miller, Albert 
 Dick, Lizzie Rapp, Earl Butz, Katie Reynolds, Norman Dibble, John 
 Baracchi, Henry Kohler, Lizzie Bloss, L. Bittner, D. Smith, May 
 Lusch, Charles Woepple, sr., Harry Gischel, John Porta, John Booth, 
 Raymond Vliet, Alma Barber, L. Rivetti, Primo Bareluetti, Seconda 
 Ricca, J. Regis, Enrico Condi, James Fiorina, Frank Vaccaro, Edna 
 Van Syckle, Jennie Huff, Carolina Dieda, Joseph Pierson, Gustav 
 Meyner, Moses Glackin, Frank S. Raub, James E. Leidich, Edward 
 Foreman, A. Miller, Louis Dieda, Floyd Bowers, Thomas McHugh, 
 Emil Huber, William Potts, Arthur Mellick, Barnard Miller, E. 
 Roncoroni, Egenio Arrighi, Phaon Bittner, William Bougher, A. 
 
CERTAIN INJUNCTION" AND LABOR CASES. 15 
 
 Clerici, Lorenzo Comoylio, Philip Dowling, George Feist, Harry 
 Fritts, Joseph Gold, Clarence Insley, W. Jacobawitz, Henri Lawrenz, 
 Marion Borchetta, William Miers, Irwin Rex, A. Ruppel, Louis 
 Sherman, James Tierne}^, William Meyner, Jacob Wieghorst, Brook 
 Stabp, D. Cassozza, John Booth, John Meyner, G. Barrachi, P. Moser, 
 J. A. Porta, E. Monti, Albert Meyner, Olive Huff, Frank Fisher, Nan 
 Crosby, Amzie Smith, Sue Wilson, Mrs. James E. Potts, The Bach- 
 elors' Club, John S. Lark, Edgar Fraunfelter, Arch. Merrick, show 
 cause before the chancellor, at the chancery chambers in Newark, on 
 Tuesday, the 28th day of January, A. D. 1908, at 10 o'clock in the 
 forenoon, or as soon thereafter as counsel can be heard, why an 
 injunction should not issue according to the prayer of said bill of 
 complaint. 
 
 And in the meantime, and until the further order of this court, the 
 said The Silk Loom-Fixers and Twisters' Benefit Association, Local 
 No. 661, United Textile Workers of America, their and each of their 
 officers and agents, Daniel Carey, John Tobin, George H. Edelston, 
 Arthur De Witt, Fannie Bachman, L. Bachman, Mrs. Noll, Jennie 
 Rissmiller, Frank Gill, M. Nussman, Allen Paul, John Fehley, Ed. 
 Tobin, Ella Tobin, Leida Meyner, Jennie Meyner, Augusta Meyner, 
 Laura Glackin, Sadie Glackin, A. Rista, Abe Rosenberry, Miles Gipp, 
 Fred Vogel, Laura Vogel, Mrs. John Tobin, A. Freedman, Sallie 
 Sterner, Joe Stabp, William B. Stabp, Con. Kelley, Peter Masco, 
 Thomas O'Brien, Mamie Edelston, Marg. A. Gipp, Nellie Huff, Fred 
 Deats, Arthur Meyner, Nellie Miller, Albert Dick, Lizzie Rapp, Earl 
 Butz, Katie Reynolds, Norman Dibble, John Barrachi, Henry 
 Kohler, Lizzie Bloss, L. Bittner, D. Smith, May Lusch, Charles Woep- 
 ple, sr., Harry Gischel, John Porta, John Booth, Raymond Vliet, 
 Alma Barber, L. Rivetti, Primo Barchietti, Seconda Ricca, J. Regis, 
 Enrico Condi, James Fiorina, Frank Vaccaro, Edna Van Syckle, 
 Jennie Huff, Carolina Dieda, Joseph Pierson, Gustav Meyner, Moses 
 Glackin, Frank S. Raub, James E. Leidich, Edward Foreman, A. 
 Miller, Louis Dieda, Floyd Bowers, Thomas McHugh, Emil Huber, 
 William Potts, Arthur Mellick, Barnard Miller, E. Roncoroni, Egenio 
 Arrighi, Phaon Bittner, William Bougher, A. Clerici, Lorenzo Comoy- 
 lio, Philip Dowling, George Feist, Harry Fritts, Joseph Gold, Clarence 
 Insley, W. Jacobawitz, Henri Lawrenz, Marion Barchetta, William 
 Miers, Irwin Rex, A. Ruppel, Louis Sherman, James Tierney, William 
 Meyner, Jacob Wieghorst, Brook Stabp, D. Cassozza, John Booth, 
 John Meyner, G. Barrachi, P. Moser, J. A. Porta, E. Monti, Albert 
 Meyner, Olive Huff, Frank Fisher, Nan Crosby, Amzie Smith, Sue 
 Wilson, Mrs. James E. Potts, The Bachelors' Club, John S. Lark, 
 Edgar Fraunfelter, Arch. Merrick, and each of them, be, and they 
 hereby are, restrained from in any manner knowingly and intention- 
 ally causing, or attempting to cause, by threats, offers of money, 
 payments of money, offering to pay expenses, or by inducements or 
 persuasions to any employee or employees of the complainant under 
 contract to render service to it, to break such contract by quitting 
 such service ; from any and all personal molestation of persons willing 
 to be employed by complainant with intent to coerce such persons 
 from entering such employment ; from addressing persons willing to be 
 employed by complainant against their will, and thereby causing 
 them personal annoyance with a view to persuade them to refrain 
 from such employment ; from loitering or picketing in the streets near 
 
16 CERTAIN INJUNCTION AND LABOR CASES. 
 
 the premises of complainant on Stockton street, in the town of Phil- 
 lipsburg, Warren county, N. J., and in the streets of said town in and 
 along which it is necessary for the employees of the complainant to 
 pass in going to and from their work, with intent to procure the per- 
 sonal molestation and annoyance of persons employed, or willing to 
 be employed by complainant, and to induce them to refrain from such 
 employment; from violence, threats of violence, insults, indecent talk, 
 abusive epithets, annoying language, acts or conduct practiced upon 
 
 Sersons without their consent with intent to coerce them to refrain 
 ■om entering the employment of complainant, or to leave its employ- 
 ment; from attempting to cause any persons employed by com- 
 plainant to leave such employment by intimidating or annoying such 
 employees by annoying language, acts, or conduct, or cause persons 
 willing to be employed by complainant to refrain from so doing by 
 annoying language, acts, or conduct; from inducing, persuading, or 
 causing, or attempting to induce, persuade, or cause the employees of 
 complainant to break their contract of service with complainant or 
 quit their employment; from entering the said premises of the com- 
 plainant in the town of Phillipsburg aforesaid against its will, with 
 intent to interfere with its business, and that the above-named 
 defendants, and each and every of them, and any and all other 
 persons associated with them be, and they hereby are restrained from 
 in any manner interfering with, hindering, obstructing or stopping 
 an3 T of the business of the complainant, its agents, servants, or em- 
 ployees, in the operation of its said business at its said works in Phil- 
 lipsburg, N. J., and from doing any act whatever in furtherance of any 
 conspiracy o* combination to restrain complainant, or its agents or 
 employees, in the free and unhindered control of its business, and 
 from ordering, directing, aiding, assisting, or abetting in any manner 
 any person to commit any or either of the acts aforesaid, and from 
 going, either singly or collectively, to the homes of the complainant's 
 employees, or any of them, for the purpose of intimidating, or hiring 
 or inducing, any or all of them to leave the employ of the complainant, 
 or from entering complainant's employ, and from intimidating or in 
 any manner threatening the wives, parents, or families of said 
 employees at their homes, and from conspiring in meetings, or other- 
 wise conspiring together, by threats or other unlawful coercion, to 
 induce or coerce any of the employees of the complainant to leave the 
 service of said complainant, or prevent any person by threats, 
 intimidation, force, or violence from entering the service of com- 
 plainant, and from inducing, or causing, or attempting to induce, or 
 cause, merchants or tradesmen and others to refrain from, or to refuse 
 1<> deal with the complainant and its employees, or (hose who board 
 or lodge the employees of complainant by threats of injury to the 
 business of such merchants or tradesmen and others, and from in any- 
 wise threatening any person or persons to injure his or their business, 
 if such person or persons shall deal with the complainant and its 
 employees, and from boycotting the complainant in its business, or 
 those who deal wit i i the complainant or the complainant's employees 
 in their business, and from persuading or attempting to persuade 
 merchants or tradesmen and others from dealing with the said com- 
 plainant or its employees, or those who lodge or board the com- 
 plainant's employees, and from using money of the said associations, 
 or either of them, or associations allied to them, or either of them, or 
 
CERTAIN INJUNCTION AND LABOR CASES. 17 
 
 other money in furtherance of the purpose of preventing further 
 employees of the complainant from returning to their work, and 
 paying money to any employees of the complainant to induce them to 
 leave, and to prevent persons seeking employment in the complain- 
 ant's mill from taking said employment, and from collecting and 
 assembling on private property near the mill of the complainant for 
 the purpose of threatening, intimidating, annoying, and molesting the 
 complainant's employees being on the complainant's premises, or 
 passing to and from then work at complainant's mill, and, if owners 
 and occupiers of said private property, from permitting such unlawful 
 assemblages therein. 
 
 And it is further ordered that uncertified copies of this order may 
 be served upon the defendants, within or without the State of New 
 Jersey, and upon as many of them as can practically be served, and 
 that uncertified copies of the bill of complaint and the affid^its 
 annexed thereto be served on the said defendants, "w ithin or without 
 the State of New Jersey, or upon as many of them as can practically 
 be served, at least five days before said day of hearing. 
 
 W. J. Magie, a 
 
 Respectfully advised. 
 
 James E. Howell, V. C. 
 
 A true copy. 
 
 Vivian M. Lewis, Clerk. 
 
 Supreme Court, Chemung County. Payne Company, plaintiff, 
 against Fritz Ellett, George Moshier, William Sutton, John Dur- 
 ham, Daniel Ankner, Edward Wickham, Peter J. Carroll, John 
 Dense, James Hardman, Lewis Martin, Arthur Watkins, Marcus 
 Schumacher, Ellis Oldham, William Andrus, Patrick Cusick, Pat- 
 rick Holleran, Daniel Cusick, Thomas Mclnerney, Michael Mclner- 
 ney, jr., Patrick Mclnerney, Michael Hurley, Henry Donovan, John 
 Duffy, and Thomas M. Sullivan, defendants. 
 
 INJUNCTION ORDER. 
 
 Upon reading the summons and complaint in this action, the com- 
 plaint being verified February 14, 1903, and the affidavits of Horace 
 K. Hathaway, E. Hildebrant, A. A. Rinker, F. P. Jay, F. A. Kies, 
 Eugene Kies, A. M. Ennis, A. Dauch, B. Kern, G. L. Smith, A. Ward, 
 G. Benson, C. J. Holland, Charles B. Swain, Walter Ketley, and others, 
 Nathan B. Payne, Benjamin N. Payne, and Erwin J. Baldwin, each 
 of said affidavits being verified February 14, 1903, it appearing 
 therefrom to my satisfaction that the plaintiff demands and is entitled 
 to a judgment against the defendants restraining the commission and 
 continuance of the acts hereinafter enjoined, as violations of the 
 plaintiff's personal and property rights, as mentioned and described 
 in the complaint herein, and that the commission or continuance of 
 such acts during the pendency of this action would produce injury 
 to the plaintiff for which it has no adequate remedy at law; and the 
 plaintiff having given an undertaking as required by law; and it 
 appearing that this is a case where the right to an injunction order 
 depends upon the nature of the action; 
 S. Doc. 504, 60-1 2 
 
18 CERTAIN INJUNCTION AND LABOR CASES. 
 
 It is ordered that the defendants, and each and every one thereof, 
 and all persons acting and combining with them, and each and every 
 other person whomsoever, known or unknown, be, during tire pen- 
 dency of this action and until the further order of the court, enjoined 
 and restrained and commanded absolutely to desist and refrain from 
 in any manner or way interfering with the employees of the plaintiff 
 now in its employ, and from in any manner interfering with any per- 
 son who may desire to enter the employ of the plaintiff by means 
 of threats, intimidation, espionage, picketing, personal violence, the 
 calling or applying of the names ''scab," "pimp," "pup," or any 
 other indecent, insulting, or opprobrious name or epithet, or by any 
 other means whatsoever calculated or intended to compel, prevent, 
 or force any person from entering or continuing in the employment 
 of the plaintiff, or calculated or intended to induce through fear, appre- 
 hension, or loss of social standing or injury to property or peace, any 
 person from entering or continuing in the employment of the plaintiff, 
 or calculated or intended to induce any such persons to leave the 
 employment of the plaintiff; by threats, intimidations, coercive man- 
 ner, physical or otherwise, from interfering with, intimidating, molest- 
 ing, or threatening in any manner any person or persons with the 
 purpose or intent of inducing such person or persons not to deal with or 
 do business with plaintiff ; or congregating or loitering about or near the 
 neighborhood of the plaintiff's said shops or the home of any of its em- 
 ployees, or in any other places with the intent to interfere by threats, 
 force, moral or physical coercion, or the application or calling of vile, 
 opprobrious, or disagreeable names or epithet, with those who may 
 at any time be the employees of the plaintiff, or who may desire at 
 any time to become employees of the plaintiff or do any business of 
 any kind or description with the plaintiff, or interfere with the prose- 
 cution of plaintiff's business, from picketing or patroling the said 
 shops or other premises of the plaintiff, or the homes and stopping 
 places of its employees, or the approaches or entrances thereto, or 
 loitering in or about any of the places named or making loud or bois- 
 terous noises in the vicinity thereof, for the purpose of intimidating, 
 or such interference as aforesaid with the plaintiff's officers or em- 
 ployees or those who desire to become plaintiff's employees or to do 
 business of any kind with it: from interfering in any manner afore- 
 said with the free access of all persons, employees or others, to plain- 
 tiff's premises or places of work, and the free and unmolested passage 
 of such employees to and from their places of business or homes, or 
 interfering by any act expressing or implying a threat, intimidation, 
 or force or causing annoyance in any manner implying force and 
 intimidation <>r threats to the employees of plaintiff; from giving 
 directions or orders to any person or persons, committees, or bodies 
 for the performance of any such act or threat hereby enjoined. 
 
 The grounds upon which this injunction order is granted are that 
 the plain! ill"- business has been and will la 1 interfered with by the 
 acts of the defendants of the character hereinbefore enjoined and 
 restrained, and that the defendants have committed and are threat- 
 ening to continue doings and acts of the character hereinbefore en- 
 joined, which acts are unlawful and injurious and damaging to the 
 plaintiff, for which grievances it has no adequate remedy at law. 
 Dated February 14, 1903. 
 
 Walter 1 .loyd Smith, 
 Justict oftht Supreme ('<>>irt. 
 
CERTAIN INJUNCTION AND LABOR OASES. 19 
 
 Supreme Court, Albany County. Rensselaer Manufacturing Com- 
 pany, Plaintiff, v. W. Simpson, whose full first or Christian name 
 is to plaintiff unknown, as president of the Foundry Employees' 
 Union, No. 5, of the International Brotherhood of Foundry 
 Emplo}^ees, said W. Simpson being president of said Union 
 No. 5, Thomas McNeill, as secretary of said union, W. Simpson 
 individually, whose full first or Christian name is to plaintiff 
 unknown, said Simpson being president of said Union No. 5, George 
 Abdulah, Chris Bangor, William Baxter, Simon Blount, A. Canis- 
 tini, whose full first or Christian name is to plaintiff unknown, 
 said Canistini being the Canistini who is a member of said Union 
 No. 5, Fred Childs, Aristidi Christo, George Clickner, Dominic 
 Compirella, Frank Covert, P. Crosey, whose full first or Christian 
 name is to plaintiff unknown, said Compirella being the Compirella 
 who is a member of said Union No. 5, Charles Downs, Soloman 
 Dupont, Grant Elliott, Louis Falcott, Dennis Folly, Fred Gero, 
 Nicola Graziani, A. J. Grenier, whose full first or Christian name 
 is to plaintiff unknown, said Grenier being the Grenier who is 
 a member of said Union No. 5, Mike Gushaw, A. C. Howe, whose 
 full first or Christian name is to plaintiff unknown, said Howe being 
 the Howe who is a member of said Union No. 5, John Ingram, 
 Sam Isaac, Neilson Jacobsen, Charles Katovia, John Bogert, John 
 Corbett, Mike Denaldo, Tony Denaldo, Tony Gribinsky, Frank 
 Jrzdik, William Schultz, Peter Yish, Fred Kemp, Neilson Krough, 
 Frank La Soon, Anton Lesoske, Herman Link, Samuel MacKnight, 
 Carl Mink, Peter Monx, Domino Mowry, Richard Nelson, G. 
 Peter, whose full first or Christian name is to plaintiff unknown, 
 said Peter being the Peter who is a member of said Union No. 5, 
 John Platz, Louis Preacup, Tom Roach, Marrceli Rozoski, John 
 Ryan, John Sanchuck, James Simpson, Alex Smith, Frank Smith, 
 John Smith, John Taylor, John Vosale, Charles Wittman, Alex 
 Noum, Luca Vosale, Thomas Morrissy, Wilson Warren, Joseph 
 Waffner, and Harry Richie, defendants. 
 
 ORDER OF INJUNCTION. 
 
 On reading and filing the summons and verified complaint herein 
 and the affidavit of Ellis L. Rowe, verified May 5, 1906, the affidavits 
 of Richard J. Rasmuson, Hans C. Beck, Katharine Rivers, Charles 
 Rivers, George Isaacs and Moses Belledy, Frank Ille and George 
 Briskan, all verified the 5th day of May, 1906, and it appearing to my 
 satisfaction the plaintiff demands and is entitled to judgments against 
 the defendant restraining the continuance of certain acts the con- 
 tinuance of which acts during the pendency of this action would 
 produce injury to the plaintiff herein, and the said plaintiff having 
 given security required by law, now, on motion of John Scanlon, 
 attorney for the plaintiff, it is hereby ordered as follows : 
 
 That all of the defendants above named individually, collectively, 
 and in their representative capacity, their agents, members, con- 
 federates, aiders, abettors, substitutes, sympathizers, and all persons 
 instigated or incited thereto by them, or acting under their advice or 
 control, and the members of said unincorporated association above 
 named, and named in the complaint herein, be enjoined, restrained, 
 and commanded to desist during the pendency of this action (1) from 
 
20 CERTAIN INJUNCTION AND LABOR CASES. 
 
 interfering with, harassing, or obstructing the carrying on of the 
 manufacturing business of the plaintiff, and the labor and work 
 thereof which is conducted and carried on by it at the point and place 
 hereinbefore described in the complaint herein in the city of Cohoes, 
 Albany County, N. Y., or elsewhere, and from in any manner inter- 
 fering with, hampering, hindering, or harassing the free dispatch of 
 business by said plaintiff; (2) from patroling and picketing the streets 
 or sidewalks in front of, around, or in the vicinity of the shops and 
 works and establishment of the said plaintiff in said city, or there 
 stationing pickets, patrols, or crowds for the purpose of coercing, 
 threatening, intimidating, molesting, assaulting, turning aside, halt- 
 ing, or interfering with any persons in the employment of this plain- 
 tiff, either in going to or returning from their places of employment, 
 or between their homes and boarding places and the said place of 
 employment, or in any other place, or any persons who are seeking 
 or who may seek to enter the employment of the said plaintiff in like- 
 wise going to or returning from the plaintiff's said shop and mills, or 
 while passing from their said homes or boarding places to said plaintiff's 
 factory, or in any other place; (3) from accompanying, following, 
 talking with, or calling upon any person or persons employed or doing 
 business with the said plaintiff, or who are seeking or who may seek 
 to enter plaintiff's factory for employment against the express will of 
 such persons for the purpose of intimidating, threatening, or coer- 
 cing any such persons or in such manner as to intimidate, threaten, or 
 coerce them; (4) from intercepting, interfering with, hindering, ob- 
 structing, or stopping any wagons, teams, teamsters, or equipment 
 used or employed by plaintiff or by others in and about the trans- 
 action of plaintiff's business, for the purpose of threatening to assault, 
 intimidate, or coercing such teamsters or hindering them in the free 
 dispatch of their business, or in any manner injuring such wagons 
 teams, equipment, or the property in the possession of such drivers or 
 teamsters; (5) from congregating or loitering about the premises, 
 works, and buildings of said plaintiff, for the purpose of annoying, 
 preventing, molesting, intimidating, assaulting, or obstructing or 
 turning aside against their express will any person or persons who are 
 now or who may hereafter be employed by the plaintiff, or who now 
 are or may hereafter be desirous of entering its employment, or any 
 person or persons who may visit the premises of the plaintiff for such 
 purpose; (6) from intimidating, annoying, insulting, or calling by the 
 term "scab," or any other offensive name or term, any person or 
 persons who are now in the employment of the plaintiff, or who may 
 seek such employment; (7) from intimidating, annoying, threatening, 
 assaulting, obstructing, or interfering with or halting or turning aside 
 against their express will any person or persons entering or leaving the 
 premises, shops, and mills of the plaintiff', or who are desirous of 
 leaving or entering the same, or who are on their way to work for the 
 plaintiff; (8) from combining, conspiring, or confederating together or 
 by any scheme or conspiracy among themselves or with others 
 organizing for the purpose of annoying, hindering, interfering with, 
 harassing, or intimidating any person or persons who are now or may 
 hereafter be emploj^ed for the plaintiff, or who may be desirous of 
 entering such employment, from entering it or from continuing 
 therein; (9) from wrongfully, unlawfully, and maliciously giving any 
 orders or directing or performing any act or making any threats which 
 
CERTAIN INJUNCTION AND LABOR CASES. 21 
 
 will in any manner whatsoever obstruct or interfere with the regular 
 operation and conduct of the business of the plaintiff, and of its 
 shops, mills, and manufacturing establishment, and from interfering 
 with, obstructing, with force, intimidation, violence, fraud, or otherwise, 
 the business, trade, or property of the plaintiff;. (10) from wrongfully, 
 unlawfully, and maliciously giving any directions or orders or per- 
 forming any act or making any threats which will in any manner 
 whatsoever impede, obstruct, or interfere with the regular operation 
 of the plaintiff and its manufacturing establishment, and from inter- 
 fering with, obstructing, impairing, or injuring by threats, assaults, 
 force, intimidation, violence, fraud, or otherwise the business, trade, 
 or property of plaintiff. 
 
 The grounds upon which this order of injunction is granted are 
 briefly these : 
 
 That it appears from the aforesaid complaint and affidavits that 
 these defendants, their aiders, abettors, agents, members, confed- 
 erates, and sympathizers are wrongfully and unlawfully interfering 
 with the said business of this plaintiff and have been guilty of assault- 
 ing, coercing, intimidating, and interfering with employees of the 
 plaintiff while going to or returning from their work in the plaintiff's 
 factory, and preventing persons who are desirous of entering plain- 
 tiff's employment from so doing; that said defendants have instituted 
 and maintained, and now continue, a system of patrolling and picket- 
 ing around and in front of plaintiff's factory for the purpose of annoy- 
 ing, interfering with, assaulting, threatening, and otherwise molesting, 
 intimidating, and halting the employees of this plaintiff and. other 
 persons desirous of entering the plaintiff's employment. 
 
 Dated at Albany, N. Y., May 5, 1906. 
 
 Enter in Albany County. 
 
 George H. Fitts, 
 Justice of Supreme Court. 
 
 The State of Ohio, Hamilton County, ss: 
 
 Court of common pleas of Hamilton County. Order of injunction. 
 
 Anthony G. Brunsman and A. F. Klausmeyer, plaintiffs, v. Fred 
 Atherton et al., defendants. Injunction undertaking in $1,500. 
 Executed on behalf of plaintiffs. 
 
 To the defendants, Fred Atherton, B. Johnson, C. Johnson, Clar- 
 ence Ethel, J. Dunkman, Frank Delbrugge, George Brinker, Frank 
 O'Brien, Jos. O'Brien, William Rixman, Jas. Schoenberger, Fred 
 Seipel, Fred Aulthauser (or Aulthouse), Ben Schafer, W. Duncan, 
 Fred Daum, Charles Schultz, Robert Miller, Tom Murphy, William 
 Montague, William Johnson, Henry Wolsterman, Robert Fumont, 
 John Dorman, J. A. Shepherd, John Darr, William Schubler, Geo. 
 Ramsey, James Condron, Jos. Duffy, John Weddendorf, Eugene 
 Lippert, Andrew Beard, Andrew Berry, Charles Brown, Fred Waltzer, 
 C. W. Dunkman, John Bruder, P. J. Clark, L. Plock, J. Gundlander, 
 Clifford Meyers, R. Cavanaugh, J. Latchford, Jonah Williams, Jacob 
 Herborn, G. Delfendahl, A. Collins, J. Dwyer, L. Moorman, John 
 Pfeffer, John Renning, Frank Cruse, John Brady, Ben Kruse, William 
 Utz, George Yockey, William Koettel, Edward T. Valdois, Henry 
 
22 CERTAIN INJUNCTION AND LABOR CASES. 
 
 Nadderman, Chas. Beard, J. Widmer, F. Weber, F. Schull, Julius 
 Schneider, F. A. Schumacher, J. Grindlart, Frank Hoy, Clem Peter, 
 Ben Schoenrock, John Steigerwald, Fred J. Scharing, Thos. O'Hara, 
 .1. M. Duffy, John Reuss, Joe Brown, Bill Sneak, Jack Maertz, John 
 Gibing, William Dilg, Adam Strack, Henry Schoenslebon, William 
 Doolan, E. Palmer, Frank Stifel, George Boch, H. Schafer, William 
 Kalker, John Weber, William Long, Jack Penning, Weed Comlron, 
 J. Westfield, II. Alsup, Ed. Lohrey, Geo. Opfcrheck, John Yetter, 
 
 William Endres, J. Roeder, William Males, Wm. Arnold, Sunt- 
 
 lack (first name unknown), Bauer (first name unknown), 
 
 Spinweber (first name unknown), Van Pelt (first name unknown), 
 
 II. Lange, X. Doll, Conrad Gerhardt, Max Yogelgesang, Henry Laehr, 
 .John Bruton, John Reuss, Joe Busam, Wm. Fmkelbach, Geo. Falk, 
 Geo. Briner, John J. Gardner, William Werner, Louis Yogel, George D. 
 Silver, Wm. Liebermann, Jos. Herzog, Fred Schoner, C. Bartholomew, 
 Henry Staver, Geo. Abbott, John Conway, Clarence Harris, Geo. Yeid, 
 Bernard Grothe, Charles Mugial, C. W. Hoffman, Walter McGrath, 
 E. Putman, William Tillet, Henry Schseffer, James Cunningham, 
 Ed. Funk, W. Palmer, W. D. Johnson, H. J. Ostendorf, Ed. Harris, 
 Robert Theiring, Thos. Casey, Robert Weber, Richard Steifel, 
 Andrew Berry, Geo. Ramsey, Ed. Rees, Wm. Schulte, Geo. Cook, 
 C. A. Peterson, John Kniep, Moritz Stocker, John F. Tonsing, the 
 Carriage and Wagon Makers' International Union of Xorth America, 
 the Carriage Trimmers' Union Xo. 38 of the Carriage and W r agon 
 Makers' International Union of X'orth America, the Local Union 
 Xo. 23 of the Carriage and Wagon Makers' International Union of 
 X'orth America, the Mounters and Craters' Union X^o. 57 of the Car- 
 riage and Wagon Makers' International Union of X"orth America, the 
 Carriage Painters' UJnion Xo. 41 of the Carriage and Wagon Makers' 
 International UJnion of Xorth America, defendants, you, and each of 
 you, and the members, officers, agents, and servants of the Carriage 
 and Wagon Makers' International Union of Xorth America, of the 
 Carriage Trimmers' Union Xo. 38 of the Carriage and Wagon Makers' 
 International Union of Xorth America, of the Local Union Xo. 23 
 of the Carriage and Wagon Makers' International UJnion of Xorth 
 America, of the Mounters and Craters' UJnion Xo. 57 of the Carriage 
 and Wagon Makers' International Union of Xorth America, of the 
 Carriage Painters' Union Xo. 41 of the Carriage and Wagon Makers' 
 International Union of Xorth America, and all other persons acting 
 with you or them, or any of you or them, be, and are hereby, re- 
 strained and enjoined — 
 
 First. From in any manner interfering with the persons in the 
 employ of plaint ill's. 
 
 Second. From in any manner interfering with any person who 
 may desire to enter or to remain in the employment of the plaintiffs, 
 whether by way of threats, persuasion otherwise than peaceful, vio- 
 lence, insults, intimidations, or other means calculated or intended 
 to prevent such persons from entering into or continuing in the 
 employment of plaintiffs, or to influence or induce such persons not 
 to enter or to leave hi- employment. 
 
 Third. From congregating or loitering about or in the neighbor- 
 hood of plaintiffs' factory or in other places with the intent to inter- 
 fere with the employees of the plaintiffs in anywise, either while they 
 
CERTAIN INJUNCTION AND LABOR CASES. 23 
 
 are at work or on their way to or from work, or with intent to inter- 
 fere with or obstruct in any manner plaintiffs' trade or business. 
 
 Fourth. From picketing or patroling the factories of plaintiffs or 
 the neighborhood or approaches thereto, and from loitering about 
 about said factories, the houses, or boarding places of plaintiffs' 
 employees, or any of them, or causing any of such actions to be done 
 by others, and from encouraging, assisting, or advising any such 
 actions for the purpose of intimidating or interfering with plaintiffs' 
 officers, employees, business, or property. 
 
 Fifth. From interfering with the free access of plaintiffs' employees 
 to plaintiffs' premises and with their free return to their homes, 
 boarding places, and other places to which they may desire to go'. 
 
 Sixth. From gathering at the approaches to or in and about 
 plaintiffs' factories to interfere with or hinder the free conduct or 
 control of plaintiffs' business and property, until the further order of 
 the court. 
 
 ORDER OF INJUNCTION. 
 
 Superior court of Cincinnati. 
 
 The State of Ohio, 
 
 Hamilton County, City of Cincinnati, ss: 
 The Buckeye Foundry Company, a corporation organized under the 
 laws of the State of Ohio, plaintiff, v. The Iron Molders Union of 
 North America, Joseph F. Valentine, president; E. J. Denny, sec- 
 retary; Victor Kleiber, assistant secretary; R. H. Metcalf, finan- 
 cier; John P. Frey, editor; Iron Molders Union No. 4, Daniel Two- 
 hig, president; Henry Hinnenkamp, business agent; Iron Molders 
 Union 432, John Prindle, president; Henry Hinnenkamp, business 
 agent, and William Oberjohn, secretary, defendants. Injunction 
 undertaking in $250 executed on behalf of plaintiff. 
 
 To the defendants, The Iron Molders Union of North America, 
 Joseph F. Valentine, president; E. J. Denny, secretary; Victor 
 Kleiber, assistant secretar3 T ; R. H. Metcalf, financier; John P. Frey, 
 editor; Iron Molders Union No. 4, Daniel Twohig, president; Henry 
 Hinnenkamp, business agent; Iron Molders Union, 432, John Prindle, 
 president; Henry Hinnenkamp, business agent, and William Ober- 
 john, secretary, their confederates, servants, or agents, and any and 
 all persons aiding and abetting them, or any of them, now or here- 
 after, confederating or acting in concert with them, Or any of them, 
 to absolutely desist and refrain — 
 
 From hindering, obstructing, or stopping any of the business of the 
 Buckeye Foundry Company, in the City of Cincinnati, county of 
 Hamilton, or elsewhere. 
 
 Also from entering upon the grounds or places where the employees 
 of The Buckeye Foundry Company are at work for the purpose of and 
 in such manner as to interfere with, hinder, or obstruct the business of 
 The Buckeye Foundry Company in any manner whatsoever. 
 
 Also from compelling or inducing, or attempting to compel or induce, 
 by threats, intimidation, persuasion, force or violence any of the 
 employees of The Buckeye Foundry Company to refuse or fail to do 
 their work or discharge their duties as such employees. 
 
24 CERTAIN INJUNCTION AND LABOR CASES. 
 
 Also from compelling or inducing, or attempting to compel or induce, 
 by threats, intimidation, force, violence, or unlawful persuasion, any 
 or the employees of The Buckeye Foundry Company to leave its 
 service. 
 
 Also from preventing or attempting to prevent any person or per- 
 sons by threats, intimidation, force, violeKkce, or unlawful persuasion 
 from freely entering into the serivce or employment or continuing in 
 the service or employment of The Buckeye Foundry Company. 
 
 Also from compelling and inducing or attempting to compel or 
 induce by threats, intimidation, force, or violence or unlawful per- 
 suasion any person or persons whomsoever from assisting and aiding 
 The'Buckeye Foundry Company in the conduct of its business and 
 from doing any act whatev r in furtherance of any conspiracy or 
 combination to restrain or obstruct the operation of the business of 
 The Buckeye Foundry Company. 
 
 Also from ordering, aiding, assisting, or abetting or unlawfully 
 persuading in any manner whatsoever any persons or persons to 
 commit any or either of the acts aforesaid. 
 
 Also from congregating or being upon or about the sidewalks, 
 streets, alleys, or approaches, adjoining or adjacent to where said 
 employees of said The Buckeye Foundry Company may be employed 
 for the purpose and in such manner as to intimidate said employees 
 or coerce said employees or prevent said employees or any of them 
 from rendering their service or discharging their duties to The Buck- 
 eye Foundry Company. 
 
 Also from inducing or coercing by threats, force, violence, or un- 
 lawful persuasion any of the employees of The Buckeye Foundry 
 Company. 
 
 Also from in any manner interfering with The Buckeye Foundry 
 Company in carrying on its business in the usual and ordinary way. 
 
 Also from acting in such a manner as to intimidate or in any man- 
 ner interfering with or molesting any person or persons who may be 
 employed by or who may be seeking employment with The Buckeye 
 Foundry Company in the operation of its business. 
 
 And also either singly or in combination with others from collecting 
 in or about the approaches to the work and place of business of The 
 Buckeye Foundry Company, for the purpose of picketing or patrolling 
 or guarding the streets, avenues, gates, and approaches to the place 
 of business of The Buckeye Foundry Company, in such a manner as 
 to interfere with the business of The Buckeye Foundry Company or 
 its employees, or in such a manner as to threaten, coerce, or frighten 
 any of the employees of The Buckeye Foundry Company, or cause its 
 employees to leave and abandon their employment with The Buckeye 
 Foundry Company. 
 
 Also from preventing any person or persons from seeking employ- 
 ment will) The Buckeye Foundry Company. 
 
 Also from interfering with the employees of The Buckeye Foundry 
 Company in going to and from their daily work at The Buckeye 
 Foundry Company's place of business. 
 
 And also from going either singl)* or collectively to the homes of 
 the employees of The Buckeye Found))' Company or any or either of 
 them for the purpose of and in such a manner as to intimidate, coerce, 
 or unlawfully persuade any or all of the said employees to leave the 
 employment and service of The Buckeye Foundry Company, or pre- 
 vent any person from entering its employemnt or service. 
 
CERTAIN IN J UNCTION AND LABOR CASES. 25 
 
 And also from intimidating and threatening in any manner the 
 wives and families of said employees at their homes or elsewhere. 
 
 And it is further ordered that this order shall be in force and binding 
 upon each of the defendants, and all of them named in the petition, 
 from and after service upon them of said order by delivering to them 
 a copy, or by reading the same to them, and shall be binding upon the 
 defendants whose names are alleged to be unknown, from and after 
 publication thereof by posting or printing and shall be binding upon 
 the defendants, and all other persons whatsoever, from and after the 
 time they severally have knowledge of the allowance of this order, 
 until the further order of the court. 
 
 Witness my hand and seal of the said superior court, at Cincinnati, 
 this 30th day of September, 1904. 
 
 [seal.] Charles Weidner, Jr., 
 
 Clerk Superior Court of Cincinnati. 
 Fred Driehs, Deputy. 
 
 ORDER OF INJUNCTION. 
 
 Superior Court of Cincinnati. 
 
 The State of Ohio, 
 
 Hamilton County, City of Cincinnati, ss: 
 Mary Jane Erhart, doing business as Chris Erhart, plaintiff, v. The 
 Iron Molders Union of North America, Joseph F. Valentine, presi- 
 dent; E. J. Denny, secretary; Victor Kleiber, assistant secretary; 
 R. H. Metcalf, financier; John P. Frey, editor; Iron Molders Union 
 No. 4, Daniel Twohig, president; Henry Hinnenkamp, business 
 agent; Iron Molders Union 432, John Prindle, president; Henry 
 Hinnenkamp, business agent, and William Oberjohn, secretary, 
 defendants. Injunction undertaking in $250 executed on behalf of 
 plaintiff. 
 
 To the defendants: The Iron Molders Union of North America, 
 Joseph F. Valentine, president; E. J. Denny, secretary; Victor Klei- 
 ber, assistant secretary; R. H. Metcalf, financier; John P. Frey, 
 editor; Iron Molders Union No. 4, Daniel Twohig, president; Henry 
 Hinnenkamp, business agent; Iron Molders Union 432, John Prindle, 
 president; Henry Hinnenkamp, business agent, and William Ober- 
 john, secretary, their confederates, servants, or agents, and any and 
 all persons aiding and abetting them, or any of them, now or here- 
 after, confederating or acting in concert with them, or any of them, 
 to absolutely desist and refrain — 
 
 From hindering, obstructing, or stopping any of the business of the 
 Erhart Foundry, in the city of Cincinnati, county of Hamilton, or 
 elsewhere. 
 
 Also from entering upon the grounds or places where the employees 
 of the Erhart Foundry are at work for the purpose of and in such 
 manner as to interfere with, hinder, or obstruct the business of the 
 Erhart Foundry in any manner whatsoever. 
 
 Also from compelling or inducing or attempting to compel or induce 
 by threats, intimidation, persuasion, force, or violence, any of the 
 employees of the Erhart Foundry to refuse or fail to do their work 
 or discharge their duties as such employees. 
 
26 CERTAIN INJUNCTION AND LABOR CASES. 
 
 Also from compelling or inducing or attempting to compel or induce 
 by threats, intimidation, force, violence, or unlawful persuasion, any 
 of the employees of the Erhart Foundry to leave its service. 
 
 Also from preventing or attempting to prevent any person or per- 
 sona by threats, intimidation, force, violence, or unlawful persuasion 
 from freely entering into the service or employment or continuing in 
 the service or employment of the Erhart Foundry. 
 
 Also from compelling and inducing or attempting to compel or 
 induce by threats, intimidation, force, or violence or unlawful per-, 
 suasion any person or persons whomsoever from assisting and aiding 
 the Erhart Foundry in the conduct of its business and from doing 
 any act whatever in furtherance of any conspiracy or combination to 
 restrain or obstruct the operation of the business of the Erhart 
 Foundry. 
 
 Also from ordering, aiding, assisting, or abetting or unlawfully per- 
 suading in any manner whatsoever any person or persons to commit 
 any or either of the acts aforesaid. 
 
 Also from congregating or being upon or about the sidewalks, 
 streets, alleys, or approaches, adjoining or adjacent to where said 
 employees of said Erhart foundry may be employed for the purpose 
 and in such manner as to intimidate said employees or coerce said 
 employees or prevent said employees or any or them from rendering 
 their service or discharging their duties to the Erhart foundry. 
 
 Also from inducing or coercing by threats, force, violence, or unlaw- 
 ful persuasion any of the employees of the Erhart foundry. 
 
 Also from in any manner interfering with the Erhart foundry in 
 carrying on its business in the usual and ordinary way. 
 
 Also from acting in such a manner as to intimidate or in any man- 
 ner interfering with or molesting any person or persons who may be 
 employed by or who may be seeking employment with the Erhart 
 foundry in the operation of its business. 
 
 And also either singly or in combination with others from collect- 
 ing in or about the approaches to the work and place of business of 
 the Erhart foundry, for the purpose of picketing or patrolling or guard- 
 ing the streets, avenues, gates, and approaches to the place of busi- 
 ness of the Erhart foundry, in such a manner as to interfere with the 
 of the Erhart foundry, or its employees, or in such a manner as to 
 threaten, coerce, or frighten any of the employees of the Erhart 
 foundry, or cause its employees to leaA T e and abandon their employ- 
 ment with the Erhart foundry. 
 
 Also from preventing any person or persons from seeking employ- 
 ment with the Erhart foundry. 
 
 Also from interfering with the employees of the Erhart foundry in 
 going to and from their daily work at the Erhart foundry's place of 
 business. 
 
 And also from going either singly or collectively to the homes of 
 the employees of the Erhart foundry or any or either of them for the 
 purpose of and in such a manner as to intimidate, coerce, or unlaw- 
 fully persuade any or all of the said employees to leave the employ- 
 ment and service of the Erhart foundry, or prevent any person from 
 entering its employment or service. 
 
 And also from intimidating and threatening in any manner the 
 wives and families of said employees at their homes or elsewhere. 
 
CERTAIN INJUNCTION AND LABOR CASES. 27 
 
 And it is further ordered that this order shall be in force and bind- 
 ing upon each of the defendants, and all of them named in the peti- 
 tion, from and after service upon them of said order by delivering to 
 them a copy, or by reading the same to them, and shall be binding 
 upon the defendants whose names are alleged to be unknown, from 
 and after the publication thereof by posting or printing, and shall be 
 binding upon defendants, and all other persons whatsoever, from and 
 after the time they severally have knowledge of the allowance of this 
 order. 
 
 Witness my hand and the seal of the said superior court, at Cincin- 
 nati, this 30th day of September, 1904. 
 
 [seal.] Charles Weidner, Jr., 
 
 Clerk Superior Court of Cincinnati. 
 Fred. Dreihs, Deputy. 
 
 ORDER OF INJUNCTION. 
 
 Superior court of Cincinnati. 
 
 The State of Ohio, 
 
 Hamilton County, City of Cincinnati, ss: 
 The I. & E. Greenwald Company, a corporation organized under the 
 laws of the State of Ohio, plaintiff, v. The Iron Molders Union of 
 North America, Joseph F. Valentine, president; E. J. Denny, sec- 
 retary; Victor Kleiber, assistant secretary; R. H. Metcalf, finan- 
 cier; John P. Frey, editor; Iron Molders Union No. 4, Daniel 
 Twohig, president; Henry Hinnenkamp, business agent; Iron 
 Molders Union 432, John Prindie, president; Henry Hinnenkamp, 
 business agent, and William Oberjohn, secretary, defendants. 
 Injunction undertaking in $250 executed on behalf of plaintiff. 
 
 To the defendants The Iron Molders Union of North America, 
 Joseph F. Valentine, president; E. J. Denny, secretary; Victor 
 Kleiber, assistant secretary; P. H. Metcalf, financier; John P. Frey, 
 editor; Iron Molders Union No. 4, Daniel Twohig, president; Henry 
 Hinnenkamp, business agent; Iron Molders Union 432, John Prindie, 
 president; Henry Hinnenkamp, business agent, and William Ober- 
 john, secretary, their confederates, servants, or agents, and any and 
 all persons aiding and abetting them, or any of them, now or here- 
 after, confederating or acting in concert with them or any of them, 
 to absolutely desist and refrain — 
 
 From hindering, obstructino-, or stopping any of the business of The 
 I. & E. Greenwald Company, in the city of Cincinnati, county of Ham- 
 ilton, or elsewhere. 
 
 Also from entering upon the grounds or places where the employees 
 of The I. & E. Greenwald Company are at work for the purpose of and 
 in such manner as to interfere with, hinder, or obstruct the business of 
 The I. & E. Greenwald Company in any manner whatsoever. 
 
 Also from compelling or inducing or attempting to compel or induce 
 by threats, intimidation, persuasion, force, or violence, any of the 
 employees of The I. &. E. Greenwald Company to refuse or fail to do 
 their work or discharge their duties as such employees. 
 
28 CERTAIN INJUNCTION AND LABOR CASES. 
 
 Also from compelling or inducing or attempting to compel or induce 
 by threats, intimidation, force, violence, or unlawful persuasion, any 
 of the employees of The I. & E. Greenwald Company to leave its 
 service. 
 
 Also from preventing or attempting to prevent any person or per- 
 sons by threats, intimidation, force, violence, or unlawful persuasion 
 from freely entering into the service or employment or continuing in 
 the service or employment of The I. & E. Greenwald Company. 
 
 Also from compelling and inducing or attempting to compel or 
 induce by threats, intimidation, force, or violence or unlawful persua- 
 sion any person or persons whomsoever from assisting and aiding The 
 I. & E. Greenwald Company in the conduct of its business and from 
 doing any act whatever in furtherance of any conspiracy or combina- 
 tion to restrain or obstruct the operation of the business of The I. & E. 
 Greenwald Company. 
 
 Also from ordering, aiding, assisting, or abetting, or unlawfully per- 
 suading in any manner whatsoever any person or persons to commit 
 any or either of the acts aforesaid. 
 
 Also from congregating or being upon or about the sidewalks, 
 streets, alleys, or approaches adjoining or adjacent to where said 
 employees of said The I. & E. Greenwald Company may be employed, 
 for the purpose and in such manner as to intimidate said employees 
 or coerce said employees or prevent said employees or any of them 
 from rendering their service or discharging their duties to The I. & E. 
 Greenwald Company. 
 
 Also from inducing or coercing by threats, force, violence, or unlaw- 
 ful persuasion any of the employees of The I. & E. Greenwald Com- 
 pany. 
 
 Also from in any manner interfering with The I. & E. Greenwald 
 Company in carrying on its business in the usual and ordinary way. 
 
 Also from acting in such a manner as to intimidate or in any man- 
 ner interfering with or molesting any person or persons who may be 
 employed by or who may be seeking employment with The I. & E. 
 Greenwald Company in the operation of its business. 
 
 And also either singly or in combination with others from collect- 
 ing in or about the approaches to the work and place of business of 
 The I. & E. Greenwald Company, for the purpose of picketing or 
 patrolling or guarding the streets, avenues, gates, and approaches to 
 the place of business of The I. & E. Greenwald Company, in such a 
 manner as to interfere with the business of the I. lV: E. Greenwald 
 Company, or its employees, or in such a manner as to threaten, 
 coerce, or frighten any of the employees of The I. & E. Greenwald 
 Company, or cause its employees to leave and abandon their employ- 
 ment with The I. & K. Greenwald Company. 
 
 Also from preventing any person or persons from seeking employ- 
 ment with The I. & E. Greenwald Company. 
 
 Also from interfering with the employees of The I. & E. Greenwald 
 Company in going to and from their daily work at The 1. & E. Green- 
 wald Company's place of business. 
 
 And also from going either singly or collectively to the homes of the 
 employees of The I. & E. Greenwald Company or any or either of 
 them for the purpose of and in such a manner as to intimidate, coerce, 
 or unlawfully persuade any or all of the said employees to leave the 
 employment and service 01 The I. & E. Greenwald Company, or pre- 
 vent any person from entering its employment or service. 
 
CERTAIN INJUNCTION AND LABOR CASES. 29 
 
 And also from intimidating and threatening in any manner the 
 wives and families of said employees at their homes or elsewhere. 
 
 And it is further ordered that this order shall be in force and bind- 
 ing upon each of the defendants, and all of them named in the peti- 
 tion, from and after service upon them of said order by delivering to 
 them a copy, or by reading the same to them, and shall be binding 
 upon the defendants whose names are alleged to be unknown, from 
 and after publication thereof by posting or printing, and shall be bind- 
 ing upon defendants and all other persons whatsoever, from and after 
 the time they severally have knowledge of the allowance of this order 
 until the further order of the court. 
 
 Witness my hand and the seal of the said superior court, at Cincin- 
 nati, this 30th day of September, 1904. 
 
 [seal.] Charles Weidner, Jr., 
 
 Clerk Superior Court of Cincinnati. 
 Fred. Dreihs, Deputy. 
 
 ORDER OF INJUNCTION. 
 
 Superior court of Cincinnati. 
 
 The State of Ohio, 
 
 Hamilton County, City of Cincinnati, ss: 
 
 The Weber Foundry Company, a corporation organized under the 
 laws of the State of New Jersey, plaintiff, v. The Iron Molders' Union 
 of North America, Joseph F. Valentine, president; O. Leary, vice- 
 president ; E. J. Denny, secretary ; Victor Kleiber, assistant secretary ; 
 R. H. Met calf , financier; John P. Frey, editor; Iron Molders' Union 
 No. 4, Daniel Twohig, president; Henry Hinnenkamp, business 
 agent; Iron Molders' Union 432, John Prindle, president; Henry 
 Hinnenkamp, business agent, and William Oberjohn, secretary; 
 James Wolf and August Rettig, defendants. Injunction undertak- 
 ing in $500 executed on behalf of plaintiff. 
 
 To the defendants, The Iron Molders' Union of North America, 
 Joseph F. Valentine, president; O. Leary, vice-president; E. J. 
 Denny, secretary; Victor Kleiber, assistant secretary; R. H. Metcalf, 
 financier; John P. Frey, editor; Iron Molders' Union No. 4, Daniel 
 Twohig, president; Henry Hinnenkamp, business agent; Iron Mold- 
 ers' Union 432, John Prindle, president; Henry Hinnenkamp, business 
 agent, and William Oberjohn, secretary; James Wolf and August 
 Rettig, their confederates, servants, or agents, and any and all persons 
 aiding and abetting them, or any of them, now or hereafter, confeder- 
 ating or acting in concert with them or any of them, to absolutely 
 desist and refrain — 
 
 From hindering, obstructing, or stopping any of the business of The 
 Weber Foundry Company, in the city of Cincinnati, County of Hamil- 
 ton, or elsewhere. 
 
 Also from entering upon the grounds or places where the employees 
 of The Weber Foundry Company are at work for the purpose of and 
 in such manner as to interfere with, hinder, or obstruct the business of 
 The Weber Foundry Company in any manner whatsoever. 
 
30 CERTAIN INJUNCTION AXD LABOR CASES. 
 
 Also from compelling or inducing or attempting to compel or induce 
 b} 7 threats, intimidation, persuasion, force, or violence any of the 
 employees of The Weber Foundry Company to refuse or fail to do 
 their work or discharge their duties as such employees. 
 
 Also from compelling or inducing or attempting to compel or induce 
 by threats, intimidation, force, violence, or unlawful persuasion any 
 of the employees of The Weber Foundry Company to leave its service. 
 
 Also from preventing or attempting to prevent any person or per- 
 sons by threats, intimidation, force, violence, or unlawful persuasion 
 from freely entering into the service or employment or continuing in 
 the service or employment of The Weber Foundry Company. 
 
 Also from compelling or inducing, or attempting to compel or 
 induce, by threats, intimidation, force, or A T iolence, or unlawful per- 
 suasion any person or persons whomsoever from assisting and aiding 
 The Weber Founds Company in the conduct of its business and 
 from doing any act whatever in furtherance of any conspiracy or 
 combination to restrain or obstruct the operation of the business of 
 The Weber Foundry Company. 
 
 Also from ordering, aiding, assisting, or abetting or unlawfully 
 persuading in any manner whatsoever any person or persons to 
 commit any or either of the acts aforesaid. 
 
 Also from congregating or being upon or about the sidewalks, 
 streets, alleys, or approaches adjoining or adjacent to where said 
 employees of said The W r eber Foundry Company may be employed 
 for the purpose of and in such manner as to intimidate said em- 
 ployees or coerce said employees or prevent said employees or any 
 of them from rendering their services or discharging their duties to 
 The Weber Foundry Company. 
 
 Also from inducing or coercing by threats, force, violence, or unlaw- 
 ful persuasion any of the employees of The Weber Foundry Company. 
 
 Also from in any manner interfering with The Weber Foundry Gom- 
 pany in carrying on its business in the usual and ordinary way. 
 
 Also from acting in such a manner as to intimidate or in any 
 manner interfering with or molesting any person or persons who 
 may be emplo} T ed by or who may be seeking employment with The 
 Weber Foundry Company in the operation of its business. 
 
 And also, either singly or in combination with others, from collect- 
 ing in and about the approaches to the work and place of business 
 of The Weber Foundry Company, for the purpose of picketing or 
 patrolling or guarding the streets, avenues, gates, and approaches 
 to the place of business of The Weber Foundry Company in such a 
 manner as to interfere with the business of The Weber Foundry Com- 
 pany or its employees, or in such a manner as to threaten, coerce, 
 or frighten any of the employees of The Welter Foundry Company. 
 or cause its employees to leave and abandon their employment with 
 The Weber Foundry Company. 
 
 Also from preventing any person or persons from seeking employ- 
 iiicni with The Weber Foundry Company. 
 
 Also from interfering with the employees of The Weber Foundry 
 Company in going to and from their daily work at The Weber Foun- 
 dry Company 'a place of busine - 
 
 And also from going either singly or collectively to the homes of 
 the employees of The Weber Foundry Company or any or either of 
 them for t he purpose of and in such a manner as to intimidate, coerce, 
 
CERTAIN INJUNCTION AND LABOR CASES. 31 
 
 or unlawfully persuade any or all of the said employees to leave the 
 employment and service or The Weber Foundry Company or to pre- 
 vent any person from entering its employment or service. 
 
 And also from intimidating and threatening, in any manner, the 
 wives and families of said employees at their homes or elsewhere. 
 
 And it is further ordered that this order shall be in force and bind- 
 ing upon each of the defendants, and all of them named in the peti- 
 tion, from and after service upon them of said order by delivering to 
 them a copy or by reading the same to them, and shall be binding 
 upon the defendants whose names are alleged to be unknown, from 
 and after publication thereof by posting or printing, and shall be 
 binding upon defendants and all other persons whatsoever from and 
 after the time they severally have knowledge of the allowance of this 
 order. 
 
 Witness my hand and the seal of the said superior court, at Cincin- 
 nati, this 30th day of June, 1905. 
 
 [seal.] Charles Weidner, Jr., 
 
 ' Clerk Superior Court of Cincinnati. 
 Fred Dreihs, Deputy. 
 
 writ of injunction. 
 
 The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 
 
 Somerset County, ss: 
 To Andrew J. Coleman, high sheriff of Somerset County, Pa., greeting: 
 
 Whereas it has been represented unto us at our court of common 
 pleas for the county of Somerset, in a certain cause there pending, 
 wherein the Somerset Coal Company is complainant, and you, the said 
 Daniel Young, Charles Walker, Francis J. Drum, Mark M. Smith 
 Robert Salmond, William Morgan, William McCullough, Thomas 
 Haggerty, James Zelinski, Barney J. Palmer, and John Blatnick, all of 
 whom are district officers and organizers of the sixteenth district of the 
 United Mine Workers of America, the officers, their successors, and mem- 
 bers of local unions Nos. 606, 2003, 610, 27, 888, 1731, 291, and Grassy 
 Run local No. — , all of the United Mine Workers of America, are re- 
 spondents, on the part of the said complainant, that you, Daniel 
 Young, Charles W^alker, Francis J. Drum, Mark M. Smith, Robert 
 Salmond, William Morgan, William McCullough, Thomas Haggerty, 
 James Zelinski, Barney J. Palmer, John Blatnick, the officers, their 
 successors, and members of local unions Nos. 606, 2003, 610, 27, 888, 
 1731, 291, and Grassy Run local No. — , that you, the defendants, were 
 conspiring together to interfere with the operating and conducting of 
 the coal mines operated by Somerset Coal Company and by such 
 interferences preventing the employees of the Somerset Coal Company 
 from mining and producing coal in and from the mines belonging to 
 and operated by Somerset Coal Company, and preventing any person 
 or persons who desire to offer or enter its employ, and that unless the 
 court grant an immediate restraining order, preventing you from 
 interfering with the employees of the owners of said mines and those 
 who desire to enter its employ, there was great danger of irreparable 
 damages and loss to the owners of said mines. 
 
32 CERTAIN INJUNCTION AND LABOR CASES. 
 
 We therefore, in consideration of the premises aforesaid, do strictly 
 enjoin and command you, the said respondents, your agents, em- 
 ployees, and servants, as well as all persons combining and con- 
 spiring with you, your associates and confederates, and all other 
 persons whomsoever known or unknown, be hereby restrained and 
 enjoined and commanded absolutely to desist and refrain from, 
 in any way or manner, interfering with the employees of the plaintiff, 
 and with any person or persons who may hereafter desire or offer to 
 enter its employ by the use or way of threats, intimidation, personal 
 violence, opprobrious epithets or ridicule, or other means, calculated 
 or intended to prevent such persons from entering or continuing in 
 the employ of the complainant, or calculated or intended to induce 
 any such person or persons to leave the employment of the plaintiff; 
 and also from calling "scab" or "scabs," or any other opprobrious 
 epithets to persons passing along the public streets or highways, and 
 going to or from the works of the plaintiff, and who are in the employ 
 or about to enter the emplo}" of the said plaintiff, from picketing and 
 loitering upon the premises of the plaintiff, or congregating about or 
 in the neighborhood of the same, or on the highways of Somerset 
 County, or any of the streets of any town, village, or borough of the 
 said county, for the purpose of intimidating or interfering with the 
 employees of the plaintiff, or with such persons who desire to enter its 
 employ; from individually or collectively boarding incoming or out- 
 going trains or cars with the object or purpose of inducing men who are 
 in the employ of the plaintiff to quit work, or of preventing, or 
 attempting to prevent, any person or persons who may desire to 
 enter its employ from so doing, by means of threats, intimidation, 
 or undue pressure; from giving any orders or directions to com- 
 mittees, associates, or otherwise, for the performance of any such 
 acts or threats hereby enjoined, from in any manner whatever 
 impeding, obstructing, or interfering with the regular and unrestrained 
 operation, conduct, and management of the business of the plaintiff, 
 or the employees now in the employ of the plaintiff, or that iwaj 
 hereafter be employed by it. 
 
 It is further ordered that the aforesaid injunction shall be enforced 
 and binding upon all the defendants named in the bill, your associates, 
 confederates, and upon all other persons whomsoever who are not 
 named therein, from and after the time when such other persons 
 shall have knowledge of the entry of this order and the existence 
 of this injunction. 
 
 And this injunction shall be taken as dissolved, in accordance with 
 the equity rules, unless motion to continue be made on or before the 
 28th day of January, 1904. 
 
 AYitness the honorable Francis J. Kooser, president judge of our 
 said court, at Somerset, the 18th day of January, in the year of our 
 Lord one thousand nine hundred and four. 
 
 N. E. Berkey, Prothonotary. 
 
CERTAIN INJUNCTION AND LABOR CASES. 33 
 
 INJUNCTION. 
 
 In the court of common pleas of Erie County, Pa. 
 
 Walker Foundry Company, complainant, v. Albert Lingren, Gus. 
 H ohm an, James McCall, Edward Sapper, James McCoy, Adam 
 Messer, George Nueber, William Simmons, Frank Cullane, Charles 
 Schuehle, John Reagan, Martin Wickles, Joseph Drexler, Michael 
 
 Hecht, John Erb, Ed. Cory, Fred. Braccini, Rufus KilhefTer, 
 
 Davenport, James Martin, Wise, Hinkle, Local Union 
 
 No. 38, Iron Molders' Union of North America, William M. Warring- 
 ton, president, J. Dudenhoeffer, financial secretary, James W. Martin, 
 recording secretary, and the Iron Molders' Union of North America, 
 John Valentine, president, and M. J. Keogh, vice-president. In 
 equity, No. 1. November term, 1906. 
 
 And now, to wit, September.il, 1906, upon presentation of the 
 within bill of complaint and accompanying affidavits, and upon due 
 consideration thereof, it is hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed, 
 that the defendants, Albert Lingren, Gus. Hohman, James McCall, 
 Edward Sapper, James McCoy, Adam Messer, George Nueber, Wil- 
 liam Simmons, Frank Cullane, Charles Schuehle, John Reagan, Martin 
 Wickles, Joseph Drexler, Michael Hecht, John Erb, Ed. Cory, Fred. 
 
 Braccini, Rufus KilhefTer, Davenport, James Martin, 
 
 Wise, Hinkle, Local Union No. 38, Iron Molders' Union of 
 
 North America, William M. Warrington, president, J. Dudenhoeffer, 
 financial secretary, James W. Martin, recording secretary, and the 
 Iron Molders' Union of North America, John Valentine, president, and 
 M. J. Keogh, vice-president, and each of them, their associates, agents, 
 servants, employees, and all other persons acting in concert with them 
 in the matters complained of in said bill, be, and they are hereby, 
 enjoined and restrained from trespassing upon any part of the prop- 
 erty of the Walker Foundry Company, in the city of Erie, Pa., from 
 assembling or procuring others to assemble, individually or collect- 
 ively, at or in the neighborhood of the plant of said company or upon 
 or along Walnut street, Cherry street, or the right of way of the Lake 
 Shore and Michigan Southern Railway Company in the vicinity 
 thereof, for the purpose of accosting, delaying, intimidating, or pre- 
 venting any person or employee of said company from working for 
 said company or from entering its plant or from going freely to and 
 from the same; from offering any threats or violence or calling any 
 opprobrious names, or from doing or saying anything whatever for 
 the purpose of coercing, intimidating, hindering, preventing, or inter- 
 fering with any such employee or any person desirous to become such 
 employee. 
 
 From visiting the homes, boarding places, or residences of any of 
 said company's employees for the purpose of threatening or interfer- 
 ing with any employee or preventing any person from entering the 
 service of said company by means of threats, intimidation, or undue 
 influence; from picketing or patroling or maintaining pickets or 
 patrols about said company's property or upon Cherry street, Walnut 
 street, or the right of way of the Lake Shore and Michigan Southern 
 Railway Company in the vicinity thereof, for the purpose of accosting, 
 
 S. Doc. 504, 60-1 3 
 
34 CERTAIN INJUNCTION AND LABOR CASES. 
 
 delaying, ridiculing, threatening, or interfering in any manner with 
 plaintiff's employees or persons going to or from its said plant in any 
 manner, and from loitering or remaining about or near said premises 
 or on said streets or right of way for such purposes, and from doing 
 any act or thing whatsoever for the purpose of interfering with said 
 company in the unrestrained operation and management of its plant 
 and business in the city of Erie aforesaid, or the employment of 
 molders and servants for such purpose, or the free access and egress of 
 such workmen and servants to and from its plant and property. 
 
 (2) Restraining said Local Union No. 38, Iron Molders Union of 
 America, its officers, agents, and members, and the Iron Molders 
 Union of North America and its officers, especially M. J. Keogh, its 
 officer or agent, from assisting, procuring, or inducing any person or 
 persons to commit any of the acts above restrained and enjoined until 
 the further order of the court. 
 
 Bond required in the sum of $1,000. 
 
 Per Curiam. 
 
 In the court of common pleas No. 2, of Allegheny County, Pa., 
 
 sitting in equity. 
 
 Velte Foundry and Machine Company, a corporation of the State of 
 Pennsylvania, plaintiff, v. Arthur E. Ireland, William A. Mineely, 
 James Keoghan, James O'Connell, George Preston, J. A. Calhoun, 
 Irvin Sauers, Craig Kerr, J. W. Twiss, Leo Hollinger, Henry Ten- 
 nant, William Spencer, James Brooks; International Association 
 of Machinists, James O'Connell, president; George Preston, secre- 
 tary^ District Lodge No. 6, International Association of Machinists, 
 W. A. Shaw, president; J. M. Gehring, financial secretary; George 
 Diedrick, treasurer; Lodge No. 228, International Association of 
 Machinists, P. J. Larkin, president; H. L. Fullerton, financial 
 secretary; Lodge No. 52, International Association of Machinists; 
 J. T. Swan, president; J. McConellv, secretary, defendants. No. 
 404, October term, 1907. 
 
 Now, to wit, this 16th day of August, 1907, this matter coming 
 on to be heard on bill of complaint filed and injunction affidavits 
 presented to the court, upon the consideration thereof it is ordered 
 and decreed that each of the defendants therein named be severally 
 enjoined and restrained from picketing, going, and collecting on or 
 about the plaintiff's premises and works, or the streets and highways 
 adjacent thereto, with the intent and purpose of interfering in any 
 manner with the plaintiff's employees, customers, or persons desiring 
 or intending to become such, and persons going to or from the said 
 plaintiff's works, and that said defendants, and each of them, their 
 officers, agents, and representatives, be, and they are hereby, enjoined 
 and restrained from stopping, molesting, assaulting, or annoying 
 persons employed or desiring to be employed by the plaintiff, by 
 threats, menace of numbers, insulting or opprobrious language, or 
 otherwise, to prevent such persons from working for plaintiff, or com- 
 pelling or inducing plaintiff's employees or apprentices, or any of them, 
 to leave its employ, or to refuse or fail to cany out their contract of 
 employment or apprenticeship with the plaintiff. 
 
CERTAIN INJUNCTION AXD LAEOE CASE.-. 35 
 
 This restraining order is to issue only upon plaintiff's giving bond 
 in the sum of SI. 000. with surety, to be approved by the court. 
 
 The 21st day of August, at 9.30 o'clock a. m., is fixed as the time 
 for hearing the motion to continue this injunction. 
 
 Per Curiam. 
 
 August 16. 1907. A true copy from the record. 
 
 [seal.] Wm. B. Kirks. Prothonotary. 
 
 State of Wiscoxsix, 
 
 Circuit Court, Milwaukee County. 
 
 The Bucyrus Company, plaintiff, v. Iron Molders Union Xo. 125. of 
 Milwaukee, Wis., Iron Molders Union Xo. 331, of Milwaukee, Wis.. 
 Iron Molders Union Xo. 375, of South Milwaukee. Wis.. Iron 
 Molders Union Xo. 446, of Milwaukee. Wis.. John R. O'Leary, 
 William Schwab, Thomas R. Hanna, H. Harbicht, M. Katzban. 
 Robert Winkler. John Merz. David Lonergan. William F. Weber, 
 Edwin Lecher. Lally Kuchysky. Joseph Plaschek. E. A. Morrison, 
 Peter B. Kuczynski, John Lutz, Patrick Devine. Wm. Koeim. G. 
 Anderson, A. Ohm. F. Heise. Wm. Schleier. O. Grams. F. Coutts, 
 W. Hensick. E. Kounak. J. Alter. B. Marren. John Young, Herm. 
 Hernke, Joe Weinstock. Jas. Weinstock. Geo. Kuhn, A. Green, 
 P. Jonas. A. Brown, L. Dykas, F. Stolpa, M. Hart. F. Pieliiesch. 
 F. Cooper. F. Kuchinski. C. Ivazimerski. Daniel Lonergan, 
 defendants. 
 
 On the summons and complaint in the above-entitled action, and 
 on the affidavits of W. J. Fairbaim and William W. Coleman, served 
 herewith, and on the imdertaldng duly given on the part of said plain- 
 tiff and approved, and on motion of Turner, Hunter, Pease & Tinner, 
 attorneys for said plaintiff, it is ordered that until the further order 
 of this court the above-named defendants and each and every mem- 
 ber of the unions described in the title to this order, or either of them, 
 and each and every of said individual defendants, and each and 
 every of the servants and agents of the said individual defendants 
 and the officers of the said unions, or either of them, and each and 
 every person aiding or abetting said defendants, or any or either 
 of them, be and they hereby are enjoined and restrained — 
 
 From impeding, hindering, obstructing, or interfering with any of 
 the business of the plaintiff in the operation of its works and foundry, 
 located adjacent to the tracks of the Chicago. Northwestern Railway 
 Company and the tracks of the Milwaukee Light, Heat & Traction 
 Company, in the city of South Milwaukee, comity of Milwaukee, 
 State of V\ isconsin: and from entering upon the grounds or premises 
 of the plaintiff against its wish, for the purpose of impeding in any 
 manner its business or interfering therewith. 
 
 From compelling or attempting to compel or induce, by use of 
 threats or intimidation of any sort or fraud or deception or violence. 
 any person to leave the employment of said plaintiff or not to enter 
 its employ if desirous of so doing. 
 
 From compelling or attempting to compel or induce, by threats, 
 intimidation, force, violence, or persuasion, any of the plaintiff's 
 apprentices to break their contracts and leave the employ of the 
 plaintiff: 
 
36 CERTAIN INJUNCTION AND LABOR CARES. 
 
 From doing any act or thing whatsoever by any r of the above-named 
 means or methods in furtherance of a purpose to impede the trade or 
 business of the plaintiff, or of maliciously compelling the plaintiff to 
 conduct its business in a manner contrary to its desires, and from 
 hiring, employing, and discharging molders and core makers and 
 other persons as it may desire. 
 
 From impeding any of its officers or employees in the free and un- 
 hindered conduct or control of its business. 
 
 From in any manner whatever, either individually or in combina- 
 tion with each other or others combining and confederating with 
 them, ordering, directing, aiding, counseling, assisting, or abetting 
 any person, company, or organization to do or cause to be done any 
 of the things aforesaid. 
 
 From congregating or ordering, directing, aiding, counseling, assist- 
 ing, or abetting any persons to congregate at or near the premises of 
 said plaintiff with the purpose and in such manner as to intimidate, 
 obstruct, surround, or impede and in a manner calculated to intimi- 
 date, any of the employees or apprentices of said plaintiff or persons 
 seeking employment from it in going to, remaining at, or coming from 
 the premises of said plaintiff. 
 
 From in any manner interfering with or molesting any person or 
 persons who may be employed by or be seeking employment of said 
 company in the operation of its said business, and from doing any of 
 said acts in combination with themselves or other persons, or in any 
 manner whatever directing, aiding, counseling, or assisting any person 
 or organization to do such acts. 
 
 From picketing, guarding, obstructing, impeding, or besetting the 
 streets, alleys, and approaches contiguous to the premises of the 
 said plaintiff with the purpose and in such manner as to intimidate, 
 threaten, impede, obstruct, surround, or coerce any of the employees 
 of said plaintiff, or persons seeking employment of said plaintiff to 
 leave the employ of or not to enter the employ of the plaintiff. 
 
 From in any manner interfering with such persons in going to or 
 from or in remaining at the works or place of business of said plaintiff, 
 and from interfering with any such persons anywhere because of such 
 persons being in the employment of said plaintiff, or of their seeking 
 to be employed by it, or because such persons failed or refused to join 
 in this present strike ordered May 2, 1906. 
 
 From going to the homes, boarding houses, or places of habitation 
 of any employee or employees of said plaintiff, or persons seeking its 
 employment, and from directing, aiding, counseling, assisting, or 
 abetting any persons or organizations to do so with the pur-pose of 
 intimidating or coercing any or all of them to leave the employment 
 of the plaintiff, or from entering plaintiff's employment, as will as 
 from intimidating or threatening in any manner the relatives, wives, 
 and families of said employees at their homes or elsewhere. 
 
 From assaulting or committing personal violence upon any of the 
 persons in the employ of or seeking employment with the said plain- 
 tiff; and from directing, aiding, counseling, assisting, or abetting 
 any person or persons or organizations so to do or causing the same 
 so to be done. 
 
 From compelling anyone in the employ of or seeking employment 
 from said plaintiff to listen to any arguments of the said defendants 
 or their coconspirators or pickets against his will. 
 
CERTAIN INJUNCTION AND LABOR CASES. 37 
 
 From persuading or inducing in any manner any person to join or 
 further their said conspiracy or any conspiracy to compel this plain- 
 tiff to give up or abate in any way its control of its said factory and 
 business. 
 
 From doing any act tending or intended to compel this plaintiff 
 against its will or the will of its officers to operate its factory or employ 
 or discharge any workmen in any manner or upon any terms pre- 
 scribed or to be prescribed by any association or union; or to refrain 
 against its will or the will of its officers, from operating its said fac- 
 tory in any lawful manner. 
 
 . And also from compelling or attempting to compel or induce by 
 threats, intimidation, persuasion, force, or violence any of the said 
 plaintiff's employees to refuse or fail to do their work, or to dis- 
 charge their duties as such employees and also from compelling or 
 inducing or attempting to compel or induce by threats, intimidation, 
 persuasion, force, or violence any of the said plaintiff's employees to 
 leave said plaintiff's service, and also by threats, intimidation, per- 
 suasions, force, or violence to compel or attempting to compel or 
 induce any of the apprentices in the employ of the said plaintiff to 
 break their contracts with the said plaintiff and leave the employ of 
 the said plaintiff, and also from preventing or attempting to prevent 
 any person or persons by threats, intimidation, persuasions, force, or 
 violence, from freely entering the said plaintiff's service and emp'oy- 
 ment. 
 
 Dated Milwaukee, June 23, 1906. 
 
 Hugh Ryan, 
 Court Commissioner of the Circuit Court, 
 
 Milwaukee County, Wis. 
 
 Circuit court, Milwaukee County. 
 
 Vilter Manufacturing Company, plaintiff, v. Iron Molders' Union 
 No. 331, of Milwaukee, Wis.; Iron Molders' Union No. 125, of Mil- 
 waukee, Wis. ; Iron Molders' Union No. 446, of Milwaukee, Wis. ; Iron 
 Molders' Union No. 375, of South Milwaukee, Wis. ; John R. O'Leary, 
 William Schwab, John Lutz, David Lonergan, Patrick Devine, 
 Thomas R. Hanna, H. Harbicht, M. Catzbaum, Robert Winkler, 
 John Merz, Otto Aschauer, William F. Weber, Edwin Lecher, 
 Lally Kuchysky, Joseph Plaschek, E. A. Morrison, Peter Kurczynski, 
 F. Turner, N. S. Crider, A. C. Humphrey, R. Quittschrieber, 
 H. Schnell, T. Bell, W. Schroeder, J. Jaroch, H. Yungbluth, 
 P. Janssen, John Radke, Paul Fredericks, Joe Fisher, Frank 
 Schidlak (alias Frank Smith), Simon Radke, Louis Janicki, Roman 
 Strysewski, Frank Loreck, John Jeske, defendants. 
 
 On the summons and verified complaint in the above-entitled action, 
 and on the affidavits served herewith, and on the undertaking duly 
 given on the part of said plaintiff and approved, and on motion of 
 Turner, Hunter, Pease & Turner, attorneys for said plaintiff, 
 It is ordered that until further order of this court: 
 The above-named defendants, and each and every member of the 
 unions described in the title to this order, or either of them, and each 
 
38 < l.i;[.\iX INJUNCTION AND LABOR CASES. 
 
 and every of said individual defendants, and each and every of the 
 servants and agents of the said individual defendants and the officers 
 of the said unions, or either of them, and each and every person aiding 
 or abetting said defendants, or any or either of them, he, and they 
 hereby are. enjoined and restrained: 
 
 From impeding, hindering, obstructing, or interfering with any of 
 the business of the plaintiff in the operation of its works and foundry, 
 located between Lincoln avenue and Becher street, adjacent to the 
 tracks of the Chicago and Northwestern Railway Company, in the city 
 of Milwaukee, county of Milwaukee, State of Wisconsin; and from 
 entering upon the grounds or premises of the plaintiff against its wish 
 for the purpose of impeding in any manner its business or interfering 
 therewith: 
 
 From compelling or attempting to compel or induce, by use of 
 threats or intimidation of any sort or fraud or deception or violence, 
 any person to leave the employment of said plantiff or not to enter 
 it- employ if desirous of so doing. 
 
 From compelling or attempting to compel or induce, by threats. 
 intimidation, force, violence, or persuasion any of the plaintiff's 
 apprentices to break their contracts and leave the employ of the 
 plantiff. 
 
 From doing any act or thing whatsoever by any of the above-named 
 means or methods in furtherance of a purpose to impede the trade 
 or business of the plaintiff, or of maliciously compelling the plaintiff 
 to conduct its business in a manner contrary to its desires, and from 
 hiring, employing, and discharging molders and core makers and 
 other persons as it may desire. 
 
 From impeding any of its officers or employees in the free and 
 unhindered conduct or control of its business. 
 
 From in any manner whatever, either individually or in combina- 
 tion with each other or others combining and confederating with 
 them, ordering, directing;, aiding, counseling, assisting, or abetting 
 any person, company, or organization to do or cause to be done any 
 of the things aforesaid. 
 
 From congregating or ordering, directing, aiding, counseling, 
 
 DO© © ' © © * 
 
 assisting or abetting any persons to congregate at or near the premises 
 of said plaintiff with the purpose and in such manner as to intimidate. 
 obstruct, surround, or impede and in a manner calculated to intimi- 
 date any of the employees or apprentices of said plaintiff or persons 
 seeking employment from it in going to. remaining at. or coming 
 from the premises of said plaintiff. 
 
 From in any manner interfering with or molesting any person or 
 persons who may be employed by or be seeking employment of said 
 company in the operation of its said business, and from doing any 
 of said acts in combination with themselves or other persons, or in 
 any manner whatever directing, aiding, counseling, or assisting any 
 person or organization to do >\\c\\ acts. 
 
 From picketing, guarding, obstructing, impeding, or besetting the 
 streets, alleys, and approaches contiguous to the premises of the said 
 plaintiff with the purpose and in such manner as to intimidate, 
 threaten, impede, obstruct, surround. <>r coerce any of the employees 
 of the said plaintiff, or persons seeking employment of said plaintiff 
 to leave the employ of <»r not to enter the employ of the plaintiff. 
 
CERTAIN INJUNCTION AND LABOR CASES. 89 
 
 From in any manner interfering with such persons in going to and 
 from or in remaining at the works or place of business of said plaintiff, 
 and from interfering with any such persons anywhere, because such 
 persons failed or refused to join in this present strike ordered May 2, 
 1906. 
 
 From going to the homes, boarding houses, or places of habitation 
 of any employee or employees of said plaintiff or persons seeking its 
 employment with the purpose of intimidating or coercing the plain- 
 tiff's employees to leave the plaintiff's employment, or with the pur- 
 pose of intimidating or coercing those seeking employment from enter- 
 ing plaintiff's employment, and from directing, aiding, counseling, 
 assisting, or abetting any persons or organizations to do so with the 
 purpose of intimidating or coercing any or all of them to leave the 
 employment of the plaintiff, or from entering plaintiff's employ- 
 ment, as well as from intimidating or threatening in any manner the 
 relatives, wives, and families of said employees at their homes or 
 elsewhere. 
 
 From assaulting or committing personal violence upon any of the 
 persons in the employ of or seeking employment with the said plaintiff; 
 and from directing, aiding, counseling, assisting, or abetting any 
 person or persons or organizations so to do, or causing the same to be 
 done. 
 
 From compelling anyone in the employ of or seeking employment 
 from said plaintiff to listen to any arguments of the said defendants or 
 their coconspirators or pickets against his will. 
 
 From persuading or inducing in any manner any person to join or 
 further their said conspiracy or any conspiracy to compel this plaintiff 
 to give up or abate in any way its control of its said factory and business. 
 
 From doing any act tending or intended to compel this plaintiff 
 against its will or the will of its officers to operate its factory or employ 
 or discharge any workmen in any manner or upon any terms pre- 
 scribed or to be prescribed by any association or union; or to refrain 
 against its will or the will of its officers, from operating its said factory 
 in any lawful manner. 
 
 And also from compelling or attempting to compel or induce by 
 threats, intimidation, persuasion, force, or violence any of the said 
 plaintiff's employees to refuse or fail to do their work, or to discharge 
 their duties as such employees and also from compelling or inducing 
 or attempting to compel or induce by threats, intimidation, persua- 
 sion, force, or violence any of the said plaintiff's employees to leave 
 said plaintiff's service, and also from compelling or attempting to 
 compel or induce by threats, intimidation, persuasion, force, or vio- 
 lence any of the apprentices in the employ of the said plaintiff to 
 break their contracts with the said plaintiff and leave the employ of 
 the said plaintiff, and also from preventing or attempting to prevent 
 any person or persons, by threats, intimidation, persuasion, force, or 
 violence, from freely entering the said plaintiff's service and em- 
 ployment. 
 
 Dated Milwaukee, August 3, lSGo. 
 
 Hugh Ryan, 
 Court Commissioner of the Circuit Court, 
 
 Milwaukee Count)/, Wis. 
 
40 certain injunction and labor cases. 
 
 The State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, 
 
 Providence, sc. 
 
 [L. S.] 
 
 To the [roD Molders Protective and Benevolent Union of Providence, 
 K. ]., No. 41, located in Providence, in said county and State, and 
 Henry M. Donnelly, James H. O'Neil, and William Jones, all of said 
 Providence; Joseph Valentine, of San Francisco, Cal.; James E. 
 Roach, of Albany, in the State of New York, and D. A. White, of 
 Boston, in the State of Massachusetts, the said Valentine, Roach, and 
 White both as individuals and as officers of the Iron Molders Union 
 of Xorth America, greeting: 
 
 We command that you appear before the appellate division of our 
 supreme court, at Providence, within the county of Providence, on the 
 3d day of September, A. D. 1899, at 10 o'clock a. m., then and there to 
 answer to a bill of complaint exhibited against you in our said court by 
 the Providence Engineering Works, a corporation organized under the 
 laws of said State and located in said Providence, and to do, and to re- 
 ceive what our said court shall then and there consider in that behalf. 
 
 Hereof fail not under the pains and penalty of the law in that behalf 
 provided. And the sheriff of said county of Providence, or his 
 deputy, or the sheriffs, or their deputies of other counties, are hereby 
 commanded to make service of this writ upon said respondents accord- 
 ing to law and further to notify the said respondents that said bill of 
 complaint contains a prayer that said Hemy M. Donnelly and James 
 H. O'Neil, both individually and as president and corresponding 
 secretary, respectively, of said Iron Molders Protective and Benevolent 
 Union of Providence, R. I., No. 41 and said Iron Molders Protective 
 and Benevolent Union of Providence, R. I., No. 41 and all other officers 
 thereof and all the members of said union, and that said Joseph Valen- 
 tine of San Francisco, in the State of California, James E. Roach of 
 Albany, in the State of New York, and D. A. White of Boston, in the 
 State of Massachusetts, and the servants and agents of each and 
 every of the parties aforesaid, may be temporarily enjoined. 
 
 1. From directly or indirectly interfering with any contracts which 
 may have been made or which may hereafter be made by said com- 
 plainant for castings and from directly or indirectly preventing any 
 person, firm, or corporation who has heretofore contracted or who 
 may hereafter contract with said complainant to make for it any cast- 
 ings from completing his or their or its contract, whether by threat- 
 ening to cause the iron molders in his, their, or its employ to stop 
 work or in any manner whatsoever. 
 
 2. From ordering, directing, or advising any of the iron molders 
 employed by any person, firm, or corporation who has heretofore con- 
 tracted or who shall hereafter contract to make any castings for said 
 complainant, to strike or leave their work for the purpose of prevent- 
 ing the commencement or completion of any such castings. 
 
 3. From following said complainant's patterns for the purpose of 
 in any manner whatever preventing or aiding in preventing said 
 complainant from obtaining iron castings. 
 
 4. From directly or indirectly informing any member, officer, or 
 agent of the National Iron Molders' Union, or any member, officer, 
 or agent of any local iron molders' union, where said complainant's 
 patterns are sent for the purpose of preventing said complainant from 
 obtaining; iron castings. • 
 
CERTAIN INJUNCTION AND LABOE CASES. 41 
 
 5. And from in any other manner whatsoever preventing or attempt- 
 ing to prevent said complainiant from obtaining said castings. 
 
 Which said prayer for a temporary injunction will be in order for 
 hearing on Wednesday, September 13, A. D. 1899, at 10 o'clock a. m. 
 
 Hereof make true return on or before said 13th day of September, 
 A. D. 1899. 
 
 Witness, Hon. Charles Matteson, our chief justice, at Providence, 
 this 6th day of September, A. D. 1899. 
 
 Bertram S. Blaisdell, Clerk. 
 
 Superior Court. 
 
 State of Rhode Island, Etc. 
 
 Washington, Sc. 
 Nichols & Langworthy Machine Company v. William H. Johnston, 
 et al. Equity No. 
 
 Decree. 
 
 This cause came on to be heard upon the amended bill of complaint 
 and the complainant's application for a temporary injunction, and 
 was heard upon affidavits filed on behalf of the complainant, and was 
 argued by counsel, and thereupon, upon consideration thereof, it is 
 ordered, adjudged, and decreed that until further order of the court 
 herein the respondents, William H. Johnston, of the city and county 
 of Providence, in said State, Elisha Webster, Clarence P. Browning, 
 Walter S. Maxon, Henry Maxon, William L. Greene, A. S. Corning, 
 Fred Stanton, John Briggs, Frank Jordan, Harold Smith, John S. 
 Barber, Clarence E. Gage, George Simpson, William H. Randall, 
 James Briggs, George Briggs, Ralph J. Kenyon, Benjamin F. Tucker, 
 Fred Quebec, Frank Maine, H. A. Mayne, Henry Whitford, William 
 Church, Arthur Wilcox, Charles Aldrich, William D. Webster, F. 
 Lester Smith, Bert Stanton alias John Doe, Enoch D. Jerue, all of the 
 town of Hopkinton, in said county and State, and Frank Taylor, 
 Walter Taylor, Edward Kenyon, Louis S. Kenyon, Paul Bailey, 
 Leone Catelli, and Humbert Catelli, all of the town of Richmond, in 
 said county and State, and all others unknown to the complainant, 
 members of Local Union, No. 370, of the International Association of 
 Machinists, and said Local Union, No. 370, and each of them, and any 
 and all other persons associated with them, or aiding or abetting 
 them, in committing the acts and grievances complained of in said 
 bill, and all persons now or hereafter aiding or abetting said respond- 
 ents or any of them, and all persons now or hereafter confederating 
 with or acting in concert with said respondents or any of them or their 
 servants or agents, be, and they are hereby, forbidden and enjoined: 
 
 From in any manner directly interfering with, hindering or obstruct- 
 ing the business of the complainant, the Nichols & Langworthy 
 Machine Company, or its agents, servants, or employees in the main- 
 tenance, conduct, management, or operation of its machine shop, 
 factory and business at Hope Valley, R. I. ; 
 
 From compelling or inducing or attempting to compel or induce by 
 threats, abusive language, opprobrious epithets, intimidations, force, 
 or violence, or by persuasion against the will of the person sought to 
 be persuaded, any of the employees of the Nichols & Langworthy 
 
 S. Doc. 504, 60-1 4 
 
42 CERTAIN INJUNCTION AND LABOR CASES. 
 
 Machine Company to refuse or fail to perform their duties as such 
 employees or to leave the service of said company; 
 
 From preventing or attempting to prevent any person or persons 
 by threats, abusive language, opprobrious epithets, intimidation, 
 force, or violence, or by persuasion as aforesaid from freely entering 
 into or continuing in the service of the complainant, the Nichols & 
 Langworthy Machine Company; 
 
 From doing any act whatever in furtherance of any conspiracy or 
 combination to restrain or obstruct either the Nichols & Langworthy 
 Machine Company, or its officers, agents, or employees in the free and 
 unhindered control of the business of the Nichols & Langworthy 
 Machine Company; 
 
 From collecting in and about the approaches to said complainant's 
 works at Hope Valley and in and about the railroad stations at Hope 
 Valley, at Wood River Junction, or at the "Crossing," so called, a. 
 railroad stop opposite the works of complainant, for the purpose of 
 picketing, patrolling, or guarding the streets, fences, gates, and 
 approaches to the property of the Nichols & Langworthy Machine 
 Company at Hope Valley, R. I., for the purpose of intimidating its 
 employees or preventing or hindering them from fulfilling their duties 
 as such employees, or foe the purpose or in such manner as to intimi- 
 date, threaten, or coerce any of the employees of the complainant or 
 any person seeking employment of the complainant to leave its serv- 
 ice or refuse to enter its service, and from interfering with the em- 
 ployees of the complainant in going to and from their daily work; 
 
 From maintaining at or near the premises of said company, or at 
 or near said railroad stations, including said "Crossing," any picket 
 or pickets in a threatening or intimidating manner; 
 
 From going singly or in numbers to the houses or boarding places 
 of complainant's employees or any of them, for the purpose of intimi- s 
 dating, coercing, threatening, or collectively persuading any or all of 
 them to leave the complainant's employment or from entering the 
 complainant's employment ; 
 
 From giving notice of the existence of a strike in complainant's 
 manufactory by advertisement in the public press or otherwise for the 
 purpose of preventing, discouraging, or intimidating workmen from 
 seeking employment of said complainant; 
 
 From ordering, directing, aiding, assisting, or abetting in any man- 
 ner whatever any person or persons to commit any or either of the 
 acts aforesaid ; 
 
 And it is further ordered, adjudged, and decreed that this injunc- 
 tion shall be in force and binding upon each of the said respondents, 
 and shall be binding upon all persons whose names are alleged to be 
 unknown and who are alleged to have been associated with the 
 respondents in their unlawful acts in said bill complained of from and 
 after the service of a copy of this order upon them, respectively, by 
 reading or offering to read the same to them, or by leaving with them 
 a true and attested copy of the same, and shall be binding upon said 
 respondents and all other persons whomsoever who are not named 
 therein from and after the time when they severally have knowledge 
 of the entry of this older and the existence of this injunction. 
 
 Entered as the decree of court on this 29th day of Mav, A D 1 007- 
 
 Allowed. 
 
 W. B. Tanner, J. 
 
LE S '08