^ai^> ^'-:3)-> ^^^ ^82 &1 ^^m 5 J 2>3i ^.^ ^^-y » 3 S' UlBRARY OF CONGRESS.!^ B# Ji^^Kr #|j^^P •- Iwigwl" # ! .=^^^ .02 £5- f J UNITED STATES OP AMERICA. || > -^4-^-^^ ^5^^>j>. 3):>---:S^3> T^l 31 ^3>0 33 :^3 3> :3^ ^ 33 3D. ^^ ^^-^?^:fe^ =^^ p.^^O 3::^ ^ )3 3 3> ^^» 33 3 r-)-- ^1>:>33 3^ ^3>33 3^ ^ 3 3 3 3 3)3 3 3^ ^3 3 3:^ • ^ DD 31 ^3j2) J)3r>3^ 3 :3 :^_. ^^ J) :J3r 3_3> 3 >3r ^3 33^ ^.jfjj) 33~ 33^3 33^ 3>>3 33'^ 3:33 3>3'3 3:3 ^ )T5) 353 ^ 33»: '>I3 ] ^3) J 3>3-^T a>»3:^ 3 ^33 ">^iL__ __ ^n3r>3 / SPEEC H -BY- D." L. EMEESON, OF OAKLAND, -osr- Oakland JUDGED FROM AN Eastern Standpoint, DELIVERED IN DIETZ HALL, (OAKLAND,) NOV. 30, 1875. Sin&le Copies, 25 Cents : 5 for $1 OC ; I OO for $ 1 5 OO. SEISTT TO J^1SJ^5^ .A.3DIDIIESS. Butler & Bowman, Peinters, Oakland, Cal. iiT^^ rt ANNOUNCEMENT. The undersigned is prepared to lecture on either one of the following subjects, at prices varying according to the time, place, occasion and other circumstances: Eloqimnce and The Orators; The WorlcVs Greatest Orators, Ancient and Modern; Elements of Success; Popular Errors and Popular Jeudencies. To which will soon be added a lecture on * ' Gush " — a theme which gives scope for a much greater variety of original thought and apt illustration than might at first be supposed. He is also prepared to give a course of lectures — either six in number or sixty — on the distinguishing characteristics of one hundred or more of the most famous Orators, Advocates, Divines, Actors, Actresses, Professional Readers and Lecturers of Ancient and Modern Times . These lectures will include a critical analysis of the style of thought and expression of each; also, a comparison of one with another. Twenty-five years of earnest study in this rich field for the exercise of the critical faculty, render the preparation of such lectures less laborious than they would otherwise be. The following notices of the Press in different sections of the country afford some guarantee that the audiences who may lis- ten to any of these lectures will not be required to endure the old-fashioned professioncd style; nor yet the scarcely less objectionable new-fashioned style of the merely professional vocal gymnast: 11 [From the OaklatuI Daily Trihwnfi, Dec. 3, 1875] Mk. Emkeson'h Lecture — Oakland Judged from an Eastern Standpoint — A Masterly Effort by one of our Old Citizens. Notwithstiiudiug the heavy rain-storm which j^revailed last nif^ht, Mr. Kin- erson was greeted by an audience composed of the most wealthy, learned, and appreciative of our citizens, who complt^tely tilled Dietz Hall, some even stand- ing in the entry. Mr. Emerson's audacious advertising, and the assiirances of his old triends had raised the very highest expectations, and the audience were evidently determined not to surrender to the speaker; but he had not spoken more than hve minutes before the entire assemblage seemed to say, " we give it up." Mr. Emerson spoke one hour and a half , and we did not see a single per- son leave the hall: all were held in wrapt attention till the close. The lecturer had promised the people of Oakland a great deal — some thought too much altogether — but he gave us even more than he ^jromised. Hi.s delivery is char- acterized by an utter abandonment to his subject, and it does not seem to re- quire the slightest ettbrt for him to pitch his voice, of w^onderfiil Hexibility and power, on any key, vising in an instant from the deepest bass to the lightest tones of wit and raillery. And his style of composition is equally varied. He reasons by means of rigid logic, by illustrations — some of them droll enough — by wit, sarcasm and, above all, by forcible jesture. So far as we know, the lecture gave universal satisfaction, and if tens of thousands wme published for general circulation, they would benefit Oakland immensely . We under- stand this is to Vie done as soon as possible, though Mr. Emerson tells as it will take some little time to w'rite out the extemporized portions of his speech, which was certainly brilliant and grand. [Frotn. the Boston Jvnrii/U, Oct. 3, 1872.] D. L. Emerson, of California, lectured Tuesday evening in Treniont Tem- ple, on* "The World's Greatest Orators, Ancient and Modern." The lecture was a masterly production, evincing vast research and preparation. '\From the Fittsburij Chronicle, Dec. 3, 1S7(I.] Mr. Emerson's Lecture. — The lecture by D. L. Emerson, Esq., last even- ing, in the Sixth Presbyterian Church, was attended by a very large audience, and was a perfect success in every resiiect. Mr. Emerson is an eloquent speaker, and we understand that our citizeus will have an opportunity of hear- ing him again on Monday evening next on a popular subject. {From the Fittsbury, Pa., Gazette, Dec. 3, 1870.] Mr. Emerson's Lecture. — This gentleman's lecture at Dr. Wilson's Church, Thursday evening, was spoken of as a splendid efibrt by all who heard it. HI There was a large audience present, and at the close of the lecture Dr. Wilson spoke of it as one of the most instructive and eloquent lectures that has ever been delivered in this city. Mr. Emerson will piobablj' speak here again on popixlar subjects. I Extracts from the Sdv, Frandsco Golden Era, Dec. 17, 1871.] His reputation in the lecturing field is too well established to need an ex- tended criticism from us. He is now under engagement to deliver the lectures he is now preparing on his return to the East, where siiperior talents in this field command something more than a mere nominal sum. Mr. Emerson's delivery is clear, deliberate and emphatic. A.s a speaker, he is noted for his intense earnestness — a quality which includes many others, and which contains the chief secret of oratorical success. He has that perfect control over a voice of great compass and ptjwer, which many years of elocu- tionary training will secure. (Letter from Rev. J. E. Moorehearl.J Beaveb Falls, April 16, 1872. Mr. D. L. Emeeson: — Deae Sib: Having lived much of my time in or near Pittsburg, I have had opportunity — and of course improved it — of hearing most of the eminent orators of the country. And now, sir, I assure you that I have never heard any lecture with which any of the three, which you delivered in Beaver Falls last week, will not bear favorable comparison. I hope to see your name on the list of orators for next winter, in Library Hall, Pittsburg. With kindest regards, I am, &c., yours, J. D. MOOREHEAD, Pastor Presbyterian Church, Beaver Falls (Correspondence of the Pittsburg Gazette.) Bbavek Falls, April 13, 1872. I am happy to say that we are side by side with you in so far as the lectures are concerned. I now speak not of the quantity but of the quality. D. L. Emerson, of California, gave us this week three such literary treats as are cal- ciilated to make hungry minded mortals glad. Had any of our Committee heard his lecture either on "The Elements of Success," "The Sandwich Islands," or "Eloqiience and the Orators," California, I am satisfied, would be represented next winter in Library Hall. Ereatum. — For the word " professional "—first page of this announcement -read professorial. SPEEC H -BY- D. L. EMERSON, OF OAKLAND, -o*- Oakland JUDGED FROM AN Eastern Standpoint, DELIVERED IN DIETZ HALL, (OAKLAND,) NOV. 30, 1875. Single Copies 25 Cents ; 5 for $ I 00 ; 100 for $ISOO. BoTLEE & Bowman, Peintees, Oakland, Cal. Eiitf r.'d according to an Act of C'onKi'esfi. in tlic yr.ir a. d. 1.H75, in tin- ottici- <,f tlic Liliraiiau of i-'untfi'CKs, at Washiiigioii. D, C. JUDGED FROM AN EASTERN STANDPOINT. Ladies and Gentlemen : — To every one of those who did me tlie high honor to come to this place, last Friday evening, and wait for my appearance, longer, probably, than any other speaker was ever waited for, under similar circumstances, on this Coast, I wish, on this occasion, to tender my most profound and heartfelt thanks. I was in my room, down on Sixth street, Avearied by the labors of the day, supposing that I had made such arrangements that the hall would not be lighted up, and a little disappointed, I confess, that God should have seen tit, just at that time, to pour down such copious Hoods of glorious rain; l)ut had I known that even fifty, of the three hundred persons then present, were waiting for me here, I would have come here and "spoke my little piece" if I had been compelled to swim through ice-water! Again, I say, I thank you. 1 have been al)sent from Oakland long enough to enable me to look at our fair city through Eastern eyes — long enough to see and to realize what rapid strides the city is takiiig toward a fultillment of the fondest dreams of the most sanguine citizen. And I wish, to-night, to contrast Oakland with one or more of our Eastern cities of about the same size, that we may settle the question, at once and forever, as to whether the present values of our property are founded on a solid gold basis, or merely upou the flexible plank of inflation, rotten in the middle and not fastened at either end. I intend, also, before I get through, to answer the question, pretty eftectually, whetJier every owner of real estate in this city, in estimating the value of his earthly possessions, may not safely add from 30 to 50 per cent, to the present market price and wait patiently, if need be, for purchasers to come, uatil a suflicient number of insane 8 speculators shall have goue down, hopelessly, in the seething vortex of wild venture to convince the rest that only redJ prop- erty is wealth and that peace of mind alone is happiness. I do not come before you, to-night, with a classical oration, the utter- ance of whose rounded periods will fall on your ears like the sweet strains of artistic music. And, you listen so often to the bewitching cadences of your scholars and your orators, that a few plain facts, couched in homely phrase, may afibrd a va- riety, for the passiiig hour, not altogether unendurable. The question is eminently a practical one of vast financial import- ance; and I am well aware tliat neither capital nor labor is especially attracted l)y the gorgeous tiowers of rhetoric, and that the consummate uctiitg of a Roscius would not be regarded by an Oakland banker as sufficient security for the loan of a dollar. He might, possibly, accept the artistic grimaces and the appropriate jestures as collateral security after the first mort- gage on his real estate had been tiled for record. And, more- over, shrewd business men look with suspicion even on a state- ment of facts, when those facts are coated all over Avith alo- pathic quantities of sweet epithets. I intend, therefore, this evening, to employ plain and even homely words; and if I should give utterance to some expressions which s)iiack of the '■^ Back-ivoo(h districts,'' as we say down East, I do not want you to attribute such expressions to any wish, on my part, to ai pear either coarse or rude, but rather to the fact, far less reprehen- sible, though quite as unfortunate, that my exrh/ education was somewliat neglected. And, in referring to the past history of Oakland, which I shall do at some length, if I should seem to reflect unjustly on any one of her citizens, I disclaim in the outset any such intention. Indeed, I shall avoid as far as pos- sible any unwelcome personalities. That distinguished hyx>o- chondriac — Josh Billings — says that men love to be "cussed" if they can only make money by it; and if I should say anything to-night which savors of cursing, I shall do so with the iuten- tion of increasing your resources. I will qualify this remark, however, — for it is cowardly and mean to be hypocritical — by saying that I would not willingly add a single dollar to the wealth of any man, or any set of men, who have ever sought to cripple and crush Oakland. Such men would be richer 9 than they deserve, already, if ^ey were wheeling sand on Al- eatraz Island for a pound, per day, of bread and meat. Now, lest any of*'you should imagine that I come here, to- night, for the purpose of inflating values unduly, I will make a proposition or two before I get through, which will convince you, I think, not only of my boundless faith in Oakland, but also of my willingness to forfeit a few thousand dollars if it should happen to turn out that my confidence in Oakland is misplaced. Any shrewd financier, on visiting our citj-, will be especially impressed with two important facts. The first fact is, the unequaled advantages and the supreme beauty of our situation; our mild, equable climate, the romantic and sublime Scenery, whichever way we turn our eyes, — for the Pacific Ocean, lashed by the storm, is not letjs sublime than the snow- capped peaks of the everlasting hills — and the peculiar attract- iveness and the enchanting beauty of our homes — not oases in the midst of the desert, but green hoivers, exhaling sv>'eet orders, nestling in the very bosom of an earthly Paradise. This is tlie first fact. The next fact which would at once impress and startle him is not quite as poetical as the first, but it is certainly not less important, and its strange significance is intensified by the first. This fact is the low price of business property and the small difference between the prices of business property and residence property, as compared with this same difference in Eastern cities. Let us examine this financial inconsistency, for a little while, that we may see clearly whj it exists, and thus, at least, be prepared to remove and forever obliterate it. While traveling from place to place in the East, I have taken the pains to make some inquiries, and I speak far within the truth when I tell you that business property in any one of a hundred prosperous cities, about the size of Oakland, in the Eastern States, will sell, to-day, ^ — -although real estate is in a more depressed condition there now than at any previous period since 1857, — for nearly twice as much, over and above the actual value of the improvements, as Oakland business property will sell for. Take any half-dozen cities in Massachusetts — -Lynn, La«rrence, Haverell, Wort;ester, FaU River, Springfield, — each one of which is a little larger, 1 admit, than Oakland, but neither one of which is increasing in numbers, according to its 10 populatiou, oue-half as fast as Oakland, aud you will liiid this statement of mine to be true, unless, indeed, it discriminates agaiiist those cities. Take Worcester, Mass., as a fair sample of a flourishing Eastern city. If you could buy 100x100 feet of the best property in that city for $100,000 in gold, besides the actual value of the improvements, you would have a hundred offers, inside of a week, of a very large advance over that price. One of the best lots of this size in Oakland Avould not bring, I supjDose, more than 170,000. But I found, on inquiry, that the price of residence pi-operty in and about Worcester, if we except those lots which will be soon in demand for business purposes, does not differ very materially from the price here. Now, the important question is, why is this so? In the first place, this difference is not due to the difference in rates of interest. The average rate of interest in Worcester, for the last five years, has been as high as 8 per cent. ; the average rate in Oakland, during that period, has not much exceeded 10 per cent. This difference is not due to a difference in the rate of taxation. If there is any one question concerning which you are a]it to be deceived, it is this single question of taxation. I do not remember the exact rate of taxation in Worcester, but I do know one fact, and I challenge investigation as to its full force and validity, and it is this, namely : that any one of the New England States pays a higher rate of taxation than Cali- fornia pays, and that an average New England city is taxed at a higher rate than Oakland is taxed. Allow me to remind jon that if you own*a piece of property there, you pa}' taxes on the full value of that property. I am ver}' sorry to say that I OAvn a good many pieces of real estate in New England, and I will sell it to any of you for 10 per cent, less than it is taxed for. I don't mean 10 per cent, less than it cost me; that I won't do. And, while I am about it, I may ^s well own up to a regular Oakland trick and confess that if I should sell for less than it cost me, I should have to hire somebody to take a part of it oft' my hands ! Of course, a v> ry rich man in the East, — one who can aftbrd to pay any amount of taxes, — can get a liberal reduction as they do here, AVhy not? How do the}- obtain gold to pave the streets of Paradise with, if rich men don't take it with them when they 11 dieV But, to return; and if you want me to utter the most abominable lie that was ever told in Oakland, I will admit that this difference in favor of Worcester property is partly due to the superionty of that dimnte. Tlie climate there is perfectly splendid. We had, last Wintei', twenty-two days of the most bracing zero weather, the most hofriM// bracing weather, in the city of Boston, during the mouth of February alone; and no washer-woman ever cultivated the acquaintance of a hot Hat- iron, after nine o'clock at night, more assiduously than we did to keep our feet from freeing in bed. "Worcester is a manu- facturing city," you will say. Yes, I admit that it is. And if you will take your pencil and note book with 3'ou and canvas this city thoroughly, you will find a very large nnmber of man- ufactories here. But su})pose there were none here, would you swap your commercial advantages for Jive times the number of Worcester's manufactoriesV I beg your pardon for asking the stupid question. One wui'd now as to the patronage of those Eastern cities. We often hear it said that there aie more people there than here. My answer is that there are more places of business, in proportion to the population, east of Chicago than there are either in this city or this State. Trade is eminently aggressive in the East. You will find there the sharpest rivalry between villages and cities. Well, what about the debt of Worcester as compared with that of Oakland? I do not know how much money that city owes, but if any of you will take the trouble to ascertain and you do not find that Worcester owes five times as much as Oakland, I will pay for a supper, at the Grand Central Hotel, for twelve of the heartiest eaters in this city — and I do not know but I would say thirteen; and, pai'adoxical as it may seem, other things tqaal, cities liourisli in proportion to their debts — provided the ruoiiey is welt expended. Boston is one of the most prosperous cities on this continent; and, except New York, Boston owes nearly twice as much, ac- coiding to her population, as any other city on the continent. But they don't have any Boss Tweeds, nor any other bosses, to any great extent in Boston; and New York has become dis- gusted with the one-man power; and I thought I recognized just a little of that wholesome kind of disgust in Oakland at 12 one or two of your late elections. Oimihroiv the one-man power wherever it do/es to show its audacious head ! We have had too much of it even in Oakland, but it is not verv popular just now. And one word more as to the debts of cities. You can Scarcely lind a fidnrlshing city in New England — mark m}'^ w^ords, a Jloai'isk'mg city — of the size of Oakland, which does not owe a miJliov dollars. And they owe their prosperily to their debts. Capitalists fear taxation, it is true, but they fear stagnation and death still more; and the best preparation for the reduction of taxes is to make such public improvements as to attract capital, and thereby increase your resources. Taxes in Boston, wdth her enormous debt of $40,00U,000, are not very high. But she has something to s/ioiv for her debt. M}' taxes in Oakland are not as high, relatively, as they were a few years ago when we owed only |80,00U; and I have never yet asked the Board of Equalization to reduce them, though I have always paid a much higher rate of taxation than some rich men that I could name. And it was just good enough for me; I might have been rich, too, if I had not taken to lecturing and had been, in other respects, sharp. It is not manly for us to whine over a little debt of four or live hundied thousand dollars, which Dr. Merritt alone could pay out of the net proceeds of one of his little side speculations in real estate down by the lake. And while I think of it, let me say one word in regard to that beautiful sheet of water. Some people declare that that lake isn't worth a — dam. But it is worth a dam, and a good dam, too; and I hope the City Council will dam it. i^ow, my friends, I am not in favor, and never was in favor, of shutting my eyes and wading, thoughtlessly, into an ocean of debt; but if this city should borrow $200,000, more or less, pat a tunn:^ ^S: jii:S-^:Sfar T^ a>j ^:>3 i^^^^i-^ MJ^) ^^^>>:^>^rr ,i2)3::)^]> ^X12>: ^ ^ ^"-::^ >3 ~ -3 ^ ^3> >3 ^:^::r ^jy3 n ^ -^^==^^^^^3 ..^^x>r^ l2*J ^W-^;>^c^ i>.~^-^-?ff<