aSH Eg* HP ■ ■ ■ :./Mi* ■ ■ *>Y,:^ ■ I ■ H -■ ■ ■ m 3f L^ J§ MR Sk' H2 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, "ss^ Shelf..W.7. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Vi K uw £* g'M ^ * ^■fe j -:^$L OLD WINE IN NEW BOTTLES FOR < ILD AND NEW FRIENDS. BY s BRINTON \\. WOODWARD. "Old Wood to Burn! Old Wine to Drink! Old Friends to Trust! Old Authors to Read! LAWRENCE, Kansas: JOURNAL PUBLISHING CO 1S90. <* •^ • ^1* Copyright by B. W. WOODWARD. 1890. TO "THE OLD AND NEW CLUB," OF LAWRENCE, AT WHOSE INSTANCE MANY 01 THESE PAPERS WERE FIRST WRITTEN THIS VOLUME IS 1 RATERNALLY DEDICATED. INTRODUCTORY. Once in a while comes a superior season wherein the vintage is again a rich one: once in a great while a book is projected into the world, full of grand, new, inspiring thoughts. This book is not one of the few. It will simply find its place, if any, among the countless thousands that take some of the old ideas already in the world, and give them a form somewhat new. With the mass of us, ''there is nothing new under the sun." A thought comes to us, and we clothe it in words; but it had already been masquerading up and down through the world of literature for ages, — and before literature began it had been in the minds of men that built pyramids. (Somebody has, no doubt, made this identical observation before.) To the expression indeed, we may give some individuality of form: the idea has belonged to the race. In the dialectics of theology and metaphysics we thresh over the same old straw. In literature we fine, and decant, and bottle up the old wine. We pour over the old liquor into new packages, and put on labels of our own. Haply we filter away the lees and dregs which time had precipitated to the bottom. In setting down herein some observations on people and places, and pictures and books, — the writer is by no means presumptuous enough to imagine that he is adding vi INTRODUCTORY. an iota to the sum of human knowledge ! He is simply- taking some of the old wine already in stock, and decant- ing it into his own bottles. Of course he has made his own selection of vintages, — and takes occasion to express some opinion of the quality, or to call attention to the bouquet. It will now be entirely in order for any other vintner to declare that these particular wines are not esteemed at all by connoisseurs — and in fact have no commercial value: that they never were, worth bottling, or that the work has been so slovenly done they had been better left undisturbed. He shall be free to pro- nounce the wine very thin, indeed, — but not fairly, we trust, that the beverage is uncommon sour ! To come down to plain English — and the author would be particularly glad could he come up to good plain English — here are a number of essays, sketches, reminiscences of travel, — and a few bits of verse. All assorted together and fairly bound into a book. Take it for what it is worth ! The type is new, though the ideas may have no originality; — the paper is good, what- soever the style of expression. Go to ! what more would you ! It only remains to add that quite a goodly share of these papers were first published in the columns of the Lawrence Journal, under the pseudonym of The Lounger. Assumed in the first place to veil a person- ality, the sobriquet — albeit rather trite — is here retained, as serving to avoid the too frequent recurrence of the pronoun "of the first part." CONTENTS. INTRODUCTORY HONORE DE BALZAC . BALZAC AND THACKERAY A LITERARY FORECAST WAS BURNS COLOR-BLIND TO THE •TT-LAND .... george fox and his journal the quaker wedding two schools of fiction . two travelers i)v such a cast the realist in art from realism to idealism the old knick Putnam's monthly . the golden age 1855 to 1854, greeting .. PAGE. V I 10 16 17 26 33 42 43 60 65 73 83 89 97 98 HoXORE DE BALZAC. It was no small or mean ambition that Balzac enter- tained when he started out to write the works that have made him famous — no slight task that he consciously set before him and to which he devoted his literary life. It was simply this, as he tells us in an introduction, written long afterward, — to compass the whole round of human experience — to traverse the whole range of human emotions, passions, motives — to trace every spring of action to its source — to map out the whole world of human life. This was all ! At least this was all he put before himself in the outset. Afterward, as he came to a com- pleter knowledge of his own mental and spiritual capacities, he added to the above a solution of the problem of human destiny — and became Metaphysician and Theosophist as well as Novelist Universal. But in the outset, as I have said, he proposed only to know and record the whole of human life. " La Comedie de la 'Vie Humaine" is the comprehensive title then assumed by him to include all his books. This title has a somewhat cynic sound, akin to that of the lines "All the world's a stage and all the men and women merely players" — players in a frivolous comedy — "The Comedy of Human Life," observed, say from behind the scenes, by some Master of the drama, some Shakespeare or Balzac, who knows every tone and trick and gesture of 2 BE BALZAC. the actors and may put them all, in turn, with all their vaunted airs and graces, into a greater comedy of his own. Yet Balzac may have meant to use the word "comedie" in a broader sense — that of the Drama of Human Life. Take it in this sense and who shall say that the ambition is not one worthy of the greatest artist in letters that ever lived ! In some respects Balzac was fairly well equipped for Ins task. His observation of men and facts and places — as well those of the provinces as of Paris itself — was both minute and extensive, his knowledge comprehensive, his faith in himself boundless. Besides this he was master of a style which, viewed through the happy medium of Miss Wormeley's translations, we find eminently clear, direct and forcible. It is true that the ''whole of human life" in his view- appears to include only the society of his own country and his own time but, the man who can faithfully pict- ure the life of a single country and one age, has marched a long step toward the representation of all life, for "Human hearts remain the same,— the sorrow and the sin, The loves and hopes and fears of old are to our own akin." But it was not a broad comprehensive survey of the whole of that life in one view, and its reproduction in one book, that Balzac attempted. He was perfectly aware that the totality of life cannot be taken in % at one glance — its infinitely varying elements be synthetized into the personalities of one limited set of people — its thousand multifarious experiences be compressed in their record within the limits of one volume. History even would teach him that the conquerors of the world had proceeded by taking possession of its provinces and kingdoms one after another in due sue- BE BALZAC 3 cession, until there were "no more left to conquer." He knew that the whole was the sum of all its parts — and the better way to take in a pie or a cake is to proceed a bite or a slice at a time. It is not wise to "do" all the galleries of the Louvre before breakfast. Better take " a day off" — and give the matter full justice ! So Balzac, in effect says to us : It is true that it is the geography of the whole world that I am going to give you — but behold, I have divided it into a set of dissected maps of the different countries. Now we will proceed, seriatim, to take each one apart and afterward reconstruct it — then, finally, when you have had the whole in turn, voilaf you have had the whole of human life — say in a detached series of some forty of my books! For example, here is the kingdom of Avarice — quite a large kingdom this and one that lias always maintained a leading part in the affairs of mankind ! We will dissect that in the person and actions of Monsieur Grandet ! When you come to comprehend all the thousand little mean motives and acts of Monsieur Grandet, the house in which lie lived, the servant who toiled for him all her life long, the family which too served and suffered, the people of his surrounding who bowed down to him and plotted year by year for his daughter and heiress — when you come to see all these clearly you will have a good understanding of Avarice — once for all. Then there is Speculation— that is a province that extends its borders in a good many directions. Take my Caesar Birotteau ! This will show you a little different department of human life and we will trace this passion and its unfortunate exemplifications in the history of a good, honest man, in the bourgeois life of Paris, rather than in that of the provincial town. Note with me, . BE BALZAC. how often a weak-minded man manages to get along in the world successfully and acquire a reputation for shrewdness and force of character just through favoring circumstances, and attending to a single line of business which he understands — and then how quickly he flies all to pieces when a lot of scheming swindlers get hold of him and inflame him with this fever of speculation ! Yes, after you read my Caesar Birotteau you will know that side of human life pretty well— and you will never be likely to be drawn into town lot speculations around the Madeleine — nor to put your money into Oklahoma nor Southern California after the boom is bursted — though you may go in the very next time when the boom is on — say at Tacoma, Seattle or Spokane Falls. Then if you wish to see what seems a still more seamy side of life., read my masterpiece, Pere Goriot. This illustrates the passion of paternal love carried to fatuity. In the gallery of representative fools that I, Balzac, am accumulating for your edification, let us place Pere Goriot as one of the most conspicuous, yet one who possibly takes hold of your sympathies when he should rather excite your reprehension and contempt. Poor Pere Goriot ! Is it the moral of thy fate, that he is the supreme fool in life who allows the primitive passions and affections which we inherit from our animal ancestors, to possess and control him to the absolute abdication of all his reasoning faculties; who allows the blind, elemental passion of paternity to obscure every other sentiment, till it usurps absolutely the place of conscience and turns decency out of doors ! Who wishes to be a Pere Goriot, and meet his inevitable fate — yet how many go halfway toward apotheosizing parental love under the name of duty ! Now whether this method of Balzac affords exercise BE BALZAC. 5 of the proper solution of all the problems of life, is, perhaps, open to question. It scarce pretends indeed to reach the centers of things by any one great master-stroke, by any one meridian section of cleavage, laying bare the vital nerves and veins and tissues — it displays not like Browning some "Pomegranate," 4 - Which if cut deep down the middle Shows a heart within, blood-tinctured Of a veined humanity." It rather takes up humanity piece-meal and treats it topically. Is it therefore a proper or a practical method in any degree? It has certainly the merit of simplicity, and possibly, in consideration of the extreme com- plexity of Life's machine, the only way is to take the clock to pieces and lay it on the table — just as the medical professors and demonstrators lay the anatomic "subject" on the table, and proceed to show you all the pieces and instruct you what is the separate function of each. And when you understand the machine — or the human body — by parts, and you see the master mechanic — or the surgeon- -place a few of them together again, you will know all about the functions and life processes ! Possibly you will be able to put the clock together again and make it go ! The man — or what is left of that man — you can't put together, or make him go, for the "go" has all gone out of him — but, perhaps, understanding all these things, you will be able to make the living man go just as you wish — if you comprehend all of Balzac — especially his metaphysics, and his esoteric Theosophy; and have added to that all the Psychology and the metaphysical Christian Science of to-day; something which Balzac seems to have forecasted sixty years ago. 6 BE BALZAC. At all events there is a certain grandeur of simplicity about the literary method and manner of Balzac which seems to justify to some extent the application of the word Shakespearian. Not only Frenchmen — who are popularly supposed not to understand Shakespeare at all — but certain English and American critics have applied this term to Balzac. Were it not for this authority, the writer would fear that in estimating the method of Balzac with the method of Shakespeare at his ordinary level, he was simply betraying his lack of thorough comprehension of either. It has seemed to him that in their manner of producing an effect — the intended effect — upon the mind of the reader, the vivid, the intensified, the deepened impression of a character that stands for one thing through all — there was a similitude. Your Grandet, for example, is presented as a miser, pure and simple, unmitigated and unrelieved by any lapses into generosity or ordinary social feeling, — just v as your Richard the Third is put before you, an unmitigated butcher and brute. The man is placed upon the canvass with a few sweeps of a coarse brush daubed to the handle with heavy color. You get the intended effect at once and unmistakably. Pere Goriot is a doting, fatuous old father, who gives over his fortune, and subsequently melts down his silver spoons and devotes himself to cold and starvation, to feed the vices of his daughters — with no more glimmering of common sense than King Lear exhibits in giving up his kingdom to those harpies, Regan and Goneril. Neither writer leaves you in any incertitude as to what his characters will do in any case. Given the people as pictured forth, and they will act according to the rule of automatons — they will ' ' fulfil their destiny. " The ' ' bears DE BALZAC. 7 and lions" will always "growl and fight, for 'tis their nature to." This is the rule of "types" and why though easy to comprehend in the first instance, they are apt to become a trifle uninteresting. This is the weakness of fiction constructed upon that plan. When once you have been given the knowledge of their being, the secret of their springs, with the key in the hand of your imagina- tion, you can wind them up and they will go of themselves, almost as well as if their author was manipulating them. It is like looking at Mrs. Jarley's wax figures. Richard the Third will continue to exclaim, as if through sheer force of habit, "off with his head" — and Shylock will never intermit his demand for sixteen ounces of raw left lung! By the way, the essayist must confess that even as a child reader, he became so heartily sick of this damnable iteration of Shylock, that he would have gone to any length to shut it off, and hence was almost ready to justify that thinnest and most contemptible of quibbles and subterfuges employed by the imported, bogus umpire who ruled Shylock "caught out on a foul" before he had made his first base. But while the chief representative characters of Balzac are more or less affected by the stiffness and weakness inseparable from "types," most of his other creation's are clearly outlined, well rounded and vigorous, life-like personalities. Strongly individualized, for instance, are his examples of the "bourgeoisie," whom Balzac always delights to render. In his transcription of these, our author is eminently happy and successful. Their shops, their homes, their occupations and habits, their sordid toils and their vulgar enjoyments, their honest virtues and their petty weaknesses — what other French writer ever knew, or knowing, ever told them half so well ! S BE BALZAC. It is with this class especially that Balzac is most at home, and it is within its ranks, with all their absurdities and little vanities, with all their limitations of ignorance and narrowness, that he discovers most of the saving virtue that exists in French society: the men are honest and faithful to their engagements, the women are sensible home loving and pure: all are alike industrious and thrifty, while parent and child are mutually joined to- gether in the bonds of self-sacrificing family affection. When he comes to deal with the plutocracy and aristocracy of his time, the era of the ' -Citizen King," Louis Philippe, he finds all society honey-combed with dishonesty and reeking with corruption. Is it indeed a true picture of this society that, as the boldest and baldest piece of realism, fits out every married woman in it with a paramour? The writer of Pere Goriot would seem to consider indeed no aristocratic household as complete without one, and we are left to infer, easily and plainly, that it is only the youngest of girls, or the woman of the bourgeois class, to whom remains any conception of innocence or virtue. We have already alluded to the clearness and simplicity of style of Balzac. This is accompanied with a directness and vigor of movement which constitutes a charm in the reading, in these days when we have either so much of the needless elaboration and tedious refining of small things of Realism or the fearfully involved plot and the turgid or hysterical style of composition of Sensationalism in romance". Both the Realistic and Romantic schools of to-day appear to claim Balzac, but truly he belongs absolutely to neither, while possessing some of the most agreeable traits of each. You can always tell what Balzac is driving at — the story goes straight along toward BE BALZAC. r, its consummation, which is sometimes, though not always, indicated from the start — there is little involving and no intricacies of plot, no marching and countermarching — the characters proceed in natural order of development — they "tend strictly to business and dont go fooling around." "Great Homer sometimes nods" or we nod as he recounts his tedious list of ships : Shakespeare stops the action of his drama at times while his fellows fire off their big, bombastic speeches : Dickens digresses inconse- quently to display the idiosyncracies and oddities of his characters : Thackeray pauses to moralize with genial or cynic observation or to belabor and abuse his own puppets for the very qualities he has imparted to them — then turns on again the music of his measure while the merry dance of the marionettes is happily resumed with the story. But, Balzac — like Tennyson's Brook, pauses not but "goes on forever" — until the story is over and the book is done. BALZAC AND THACKERAY. Some controversy has always cropped out from time to time, respecting the morality of Balzac's writings. It seems somewhat incongruous that one set of people, including indeed some clergymen, should discover in him a moralist of the severest type, while another deplores a writer so immoral that he stopped at no verge of common decency. Possibly there may be some ground for both opinions. As in the case of the storied viewers of the chameleon in its different conditions, the variable writer may be either a lovely green — or black as jet, just as you happen to come upon him ! Taking him thus in his contrasting aspects, Balzac is found both moral and immoral, but, in his most normal condition, I should say wholly un- moral. In the task to which he addressed himself — to tell us the story of human society— sufficient was it to him to " adorn a tale" without bothering himself to "point a moral." Undoubtedly he conceived that his office was that of the historian, rather than that of the moralist; — his function more truly that of the painter than the preacher. It was his business to reveal to us the whole of human life — the bad equally with the good and the indifferent — and he no more hesitated to treat any aspect of it whatever, on the ground of delicacy or morality, than the eminent, skilled physician or surgeon 10 BALZAC AND THACKERAY. u hesitates to treat any case of disease or deformity that offers itself, or to exemplify it in his clinics. If in the course of his faithful record, these truthful, scientific, clinic notes, we find that sin has drawn in its train its own inevitable retribution — let the reader deduce his moral ! If again, however, weakness of character has brought about equal suffering, misfortune and ruin, it is not Balzac's business to controvert the facts of sociology or to provide that weak-minded goodness alone shall ensure success and happiness in life ! There is a certain philosophy, which — having given society to you as he found it — he leaves you to deduce, but morality is not a matter which concerns him at all; — no more than it did Shakespeare himself, who in Portia discoursing on the divine quality of mercy, or in Hamlet soliloquizing on the transition from the Here to the Hereafter — was not a whit more personally sympa- thetic than in gross Falstaff with his amours, in jealous Moor, or in malignant Iago ! Such indeed is the "impersonal" theory of genius universal, that sees everything clearly, discriminates dispassionately and shares alike and equally in the inmost nature of all; — and, distinguishing with such marvellous insight, partaking thus universally, is by far too large-minded to be anything much less than pantheistic. "Born to a universe," 'tis not for Genius to "narrow his mind" within the range of any one set of sympathies or to limit his soul with any system of morals — '•Who sees with equal eye, as lord of all. A hero perish — or a sparrow fall, Atoms or systems into ruin hurled And now a bubble burst— and now a world !" j 2 BALZA C AND THA CKERA Y. Now, if the writer may be permitted, just let him remark that the "bubble" which should be burst, in his humble opinion, is one that Shakesperiolaters have inflated with gas something like the foregoing, forgetting that no one human mind can be greater than the sum of all other minds in the universe — or any soul, however great, own a prescriptive "right and title" of primogeniture that should exempt and absolve it from operation and observance of moral laws governing in this world of ours. ^c 9fi. ■%. if. ^ if. Far removed from all this is Thackeray, who never attained, who never could have attained to this sublime height and supreme state of even, dispassionate feeling toward all the facts of life and all the actors in it ! What association is there between the two great names which flutter at the masthead of this paper? Very little, possibly, except that each, perhaps may be regarded as the ablest representative in fiction of his respective nation during the last literary generation, and that both treated especially the society of their time, though Thackeray by no means confined himself to his own age, as witness his "Esmond" and his "Virginians." But in their literary style they were as far apart as they were in their mode of representation, the picturing of that society. Balzac's style, as we have endeavored to illustrate, is both simple and direct. He tells his story in a straightforward fashion, without expansion or elabor- ation, though with all due attention to necessary detail to place the scene and the personages properly before you. Having accomplished this necessary outlining, Balzac paints with a few broad strokes, though each is masterly. Thackeray too has the quality of simplicity, but it is the apparent simplicity of high finish and of great art. BA LZA C A ND THA CKER A Y. 13 With infinite pains, stroke after stroke, and often intermitting to contemplate his work, the artist proceeds, modifying his broader effects with a lighter touch of color, here a little and there a little — "line upon line" — yea, and "precept upon precept," if such are ever put upon canvas — he goes on, and still the picture grows before your eyes, a marvel of representation, a literary masterpiece. When once finished, with its high lights thrown in and all its half-tones and shadows set in with due chiaro-oscuro, the portrait is unmistakable, the characterization is complete. For good or for ill it is done, and you will love or hate it ever after ! It is perhaps the very power and strength of Thackeray, that might of satire and keenness of irony, which have prevented his beauty and tenderness from being as much appreciated as they deserve by the mass of readers, many of whom have been deterred entirely from his reading by the impression that he was a cynic who saw too clearly all the ills and shams of society to discern any good in it. But his cynic tone of satire implies always that there is a soul behind the pen, that is full of righteous indignation against the false pretence, while sympathizing ardently with the genuine and the true. Say that he looked too deeply below the surface, and saw often in our vaunted deeds of charity even, the vanity and the selfishness that we fain would not suspect our- selves, least of all betray to others; say that the very children whose society in real life he so thoroughly enjoyed, are in his fiction seldom childlike; say that his young men are too prone to be cubs or cads and his old ones, snobs or scoundrels; say that almost the only woman he ever endowed with brains turns out to be an adventuress, while on the good types, he can bestow a H BALZAC AND THACKERAY. soft loving heart only at the expense of inevitable accompaniment with soft, silly head; say that his Pendennis is too often prolix and a prig and his Bayham a bore; but remember that in Ethel Newcome with all her pride, he has pictured a girl full of noble feeling and sensibility, of spirit and of intellect : and forget not that he has given back to the world, as we trust he may have found it in real life and society, the prototype of the perfect gentleman — one who, with all his weaknesses (which render him all the more natural and life-like) stands outlined to us in noble representation, the tenderest and truest, the purest and manliest — brave old Colonel Thomas Newcome ! That, too, in picturing the passing away from earth of this example of a noble soul patiently enduring poverty and unmerited disgrace, Thackeray has given to literature a passage so simple, so touching, that it may well endure with the language that he so enriched : — "At the usual evening hour, the chapel bell began to toll and Thomas Newcome's hands outside the bed feebly beat a time. And just as the last bell struck, a peculiar sweet smile shone over his face, and he lifted up his head a little, and quickly said ' Adsiim,' and fell back. It was the word we used at school when names were called; and lo, he whose heart was as that of a little child, had answered to his name, and stood in the presence of the Master." Grand old Thackeray ! True it is that thou art some- times too scornful to be agreeable in the reading — but if thou wert perchance too prone to fling the arrows of ridicule and the barbed shafts of satire, it was always at pretension and folly, and falsehood and vice, that they were aimed and therein left transfixed for the world to BALZAC AND THACKERAY. 15 mark; — it was never honest worth or humble virtue that was scoffed at or derided. If the line of demarcation betwixt our good intent and our selfish promptings was sometimes so sharply drawn that it made us wince with the pain of mortification, we could not say after all that it swerved to the wrong side, albeit it divided too exclusively on that side, more of our own thoughts and acts than we had fain believed ! Grand old Thackeray ! Thank fortune that there is nothing universal or impersonal about the quality of thy genius ! Thou hadst prepossessions, prejudices, plenty of them and strong ones — against social shams and moral in- iquities — and in favor of decency and clean living, manly honor and womanly virtue ! In spite of a cynic manner, sometimes assumed it may be to cover and veil a tenderness and delicacy of nature almost to be regarded as effeminate, — whenever a moral conflict is on — always, ■■ In the strife twixt truth and falsehood, For the good— or evil side " thy position is easy enough to be discovered. Masked though it be by the batteries of satire, it is all the more strongly entrenched — and behind them thou carriest on always an effective warfare against the strongholds of dishonor — against the cohorts of vice ! A LITERARY FORECAST. In his delineation of Balfour of Burley in "Old Mor- tality," Sir Walter Scott forecasted almost to a prophecy the character of John Brown. The age, the country and the cause differed widely, but the coincidence in character is striking. It would seem as if the key of every apparent anomaly in the life of the man of Harper's Ferry — anomalies so startling that men even yet refuse to credit some of the well- determined facts of his history — might be found in Scott's portrayal of Balfour. Devout, but pervert; conscientious, yet unscrupulous and remorseless; bold and direct in purpose and action, yet capable of craft and dissimulation; rash, yet deliberate and calculating; both tender and terrible; a homicide and a hero; a murderer and a martyr; — these are antagonisms that may exist in the life of a religious fanatic, and Sir Walter Scott with his deep insight wrought their seeming incongruities and paradoxes into the type of Balfour — while John Brown exemplified and repeated them in the stress of a great crisis, two centuries after the time to which he legitimately belonged. 16 WAS BURNS COLOR-BLIND TO THE SEA? We had been all day in the Burns country — retracing in one long summer day the footprints of a life journey all too brief, but in the reverse order of its natural course, beginning as we did in the early morning at the Poet's tomb in Dumfries and ending, in the late twilight, at the cottage near Ayr, "where the bard-peasant first drew breath." Leaying Kirk Alloway, passing a little farther up the slope on the turn to the west — and there before us is the sea ! Beyond, dim in the gathering shades of eyen, are the pale hills of Arran across the Firth of Clyde, and farther still, through an opening in the hills, we faintly descry the Mull of Cantire. We had been saying to ourselyes all day long as we had passed from one beautiful scene to another as fair, or fairer yet, each in its glowing or quiet beauty lending some suggestion of exuberant joyousness, of peaceful calm or pensiye melancholy, and all familiar in their every aspect to Robert Burns: — What wonder indeed that he has commemorated so many of them, for who with a heart awake to Nature's charms might not be swayed to some expression of poetic feeling ! Burns has been fitly called Nature's Poet, which reciprocally should make him the poet of Nature. It is true indeed that he comes very close to the heart of nature in many of her tenderest moods and aspects. But 3 17 18 WAS BURNS COLOR-BLIND TO THE SEA? after all, is it not a limited nature that he finds and reproduces? It is that of the field, the stream, the grove. He is the Poet of the Plain ! It has lately been told me by one somewhat familiar with the learning of India — the literature of Brahminism — that it would really seem as if that ancient stock of the Aryan race might have been color-blind to one of the finest tints in nature, the blue of the sky, for they have left behind no record of their observation of this beautiful noonday aspect of the heavens, while their literature fairly glows with the gorgeous tints of morn and even. As we rose to the summit of the hill back of Kirk Alloway, and the beautiful view of the Firth broke upon our eyes, it came to me as a special revelation of wonder that Burns, the royal favorite of Nature, was color-blind to the glory of the sea ! For all the years of his boyhood and into early man- hood, he lived within a mile of the sea— its sights before his eye and its sounds often in his ear — and yet, how few hints of this fact are to be found in all his poems ! It may be, as the Firth here lies somewhat sheltered by islands, that the force of marine storms is measurably broken, and that the might and majesty of ocean in its wildest and grandest moods were seldom, if ever, visible to him; but yet there were aspects of it which must have been familiar and which, one would think, would have impressed his imaginative sensibilities; those for instance which Mr. Blaine once recited as longed for and welcomed by the dying Garfield, who, "With wan fevered face tenderly lifted to the cooling breeze looked out wistfully upon the ocean's changing wonders. On its far sails whitening in the morning light; on its restless waves rolling shoreward to break and die beneath the noonday WAS BURNS COLOR-BLIND TO THE SEA/ 19 sun; on the red clouds of the evening arching low to the horizon; on the serene and shining pathway of the stars." Why should not such scenes inspire a poet to noble song, when the man of Politics is moved by them to such eloquent wording — and how should the poet miss all those grand suggestions of Time and Eternity that may be borne with the breakers into the consciousness of Statesman — as intimated in the same eulogy: "Let us think that his dying eyes read a mystic meaning which only the rapt and parting soul may know ! Let us believe that in the silence of the receding world, he heard the great waves breaking on a farther shore and felt already on his wasted brow the breath of the eternal morning." Thus have the great souls of all times felt and spoken; thus the texture of their language been interwoven with the imagery of the sea ! I may have read imperfectly, but I recall scarce more than a single couplet indicating that Burns was acquainted with the roar of the breakers. Yet this pair of sounding lines, while it negatives thus far the presumption that he was entirely blind and deaf to the beauty and grandeur of the ocean, proves at the same time that the coast of Ayr was far from being unworthy of his poetic notice. This occurs in his "Twa Brigs of Ayr:" "• The tide-swollen Firth with sullen sounding roar Through the still night dashed hoarse along the shore.' ' Again, we recall that Burns made more than one visit to the mountainous districts of Scotland — traversing them once as far north as Inverness — but we look through his poems almost in vain for descriptions of the grandeur of mountain scenery. One allusion only I can bring forward which conjoins in one brief stanza, in broad panoramic 20 WAS BURNS COLOR-BLIND TO THE SEA/ view, the three magnificent features of Scottish scenery: " Here, rivers in the sea were lost ! There mountains to the sky were tost ! Here tumbling billows marked the coast With surging foam." Perhaps the very suggestion is supplied in the poem from which I extract this verse — "The Vision" — which may account for Burns' narrowed restriction in the field of nature. Therein he dedicates himself as a poet — not to universal nature by any means, but to that of //is district/ That he was conscious of the grandeur of mountain and of sea, the lines above quoted from his early poems seem about the only evidence. Thenceforth the wide outlook on nature is abandoned, the hills and vales of Ayrshire and Dumfriesshire take its place. Says Wordsworth: "Two voices are there: one is of the sea, One of th 3 mountains — ^ach a mighty voice." It seems to me that the truly great poet must give some utterance, some expression, to these two mighty voices ! Burns declined to attempt it. Perhaps he was wise and the world has gained through his restraint. He painted no marines or mountain views indeed, but his quiet land- scapes are unexcelled in tender beauty and suggestiveness. A sentiment often underlies them beyond the reach of words. More than this — they are not landscapes merely — there are always human figures in the picture, in fore- ground or the middle distance. He paints man ! After all, I think Burns will live longest as a song writer. In that he did the literature of his native Scotland an immense service. He wedded familiar, sweet and plaintive airs that had long been straying around the country, entirely homeless or sheltering in low-lived quarters, to worthy, pure and sometimes noble words. WAS BUBNS COLOR-BLIND TO THE SEA? 2 l The union has become a perpetual one, the songs are sung wherever the language is spoken. •• And still the burden of his song Is love of right— disdain of wrong; Its master chords Are Manhood. Freedom, Brotherhood- Its discords, but an interlude Between the words. ****** For now he haunts his native land As an immortal youth— his hand Guides every plough- He sits beside each ingle-nook, His voice is in each rushing brook Each rustling bough." And if such be the sentiment toward Burns, as voiced by our revered Longfellow, then surely the influence of song is a pervading and mighty one — and there never was a stronger exemplification of the words uttered two hundred years ago by old Andrew Fletcher of Saltoun: "If a man be permitted to make all the ballads, he need not care who should make the laws of a nation." One thing to be taken into account, in estimating what Burns accomplished, is that he died at the early age of thirty -seven. Many of our best poets have lived to twice this age and performed their best work within the latter half of the lives thus matured. Whether added length of years would have brought any richer life fruits, unless that healthful temperament of body and soul which prolongs life and confers its greatest power had also been bestowed upon Burns is a question hard to answer, as well as the other problem, that of the due measure of responsibility resting on the man himself for the misuse of the good gifts and the indulgence of the hot passions of his nature ! The worst misfortune of all, it seems to me, concerning him, is that so much of the soil that contaminated his life 22 WAS BURNS COLOR-BLIND TO THE SEA? found expression in his verse and has unhappily survived him in the subsequently collected editions. Too late, when broken down by his last sickness, Burns himself regretted that this was likely to be so and that he had not, in time, culled out and destroyed the worthless. It is too much to hope that even then some of the sticks and stones and mud-clods that he had thrown would not have been gathered and bound up into sheaves with the golden grain; but we might have been spared the worst of them. When, oh when, shall we find publishers bold enough to screen out the chaff and dirt from among the wheat and give us clean, expurgated editions of Burns, Byron, Shakespeare ? In the meantime, Burns' earnest pleading may well be applied as a mantle of charity toward himself — his life and work: •■Then at the balance let's he mute We never can adjust it, What" s done we partly may compute But know not what's resisted."' Computing partlv by whafs been done, we can venture to assert, however, that it is perfectly possible for a boy born in poverty and obscurity and nurtured among rude surroundings, to grow up into a great poet — leaving behind him a clean life and noble works of poetic genius, with no unworthy ones — not one line written "which dying he might wish to blot." Some exceptional proofs have been given of this even in the old days, but most striking and noble ones in the poets of our own time and in our own land. There is an old castle in Scotland — visited, indeed, the day succeeding that of our Burns pilgrimage — whose name is memorable in history. Its tinted walls of red sandstone, overhung with the green of ivy, are picturesque WAS BURNS COLOR-BLIND TO THE SEA? 23 and beautiful even in their decay. At its foot, a lovely stream glides along, rippling over the smooth-worn rocks and pebbles, whose further slopes break down to it in sunny braes, or swell backward into fir-covered knowes and birken-shaws, while on its own side, the wooded glade soon gives place to fair fields and pastures green, leading on to gentle slopes and sunny vales, dotted over with cheerful cottages and adorned with one stately mansion. The landscape, though limited, is one of the "bonniest" in all Scotland ! In the old, fierce days when every man's hand was against his neighbor, the owner of this castle — generous, proud, fiercely independent, acknowledging allegiance to none, of hot passions and bold, reckless tongue — found many foes, chief among which were those in his own unquiet breast. In an unequal contest, where quarter was neither given nor taken, his castle was besieged, its garrison overpowered, its battlements torn down, its strong tower demolished, never to be rebuilt. Uninhabited it stands and forsaken; but inspiring as well as mournful memories cluster around it and some- times draw to it the wandering footsteps of the traveller from beyond the seas. In its quiet nooks the field-mouse builds her nest and the wounded hare finds a covert; the daisy and the cowslip sprinkle the neighboring leas; the pleasant river still murmurs by its base, and the song- birds of heaven, the mavis, the merle and the lavrock warble their sweet lays as they build among the branches that yet cast a tender shadow over its time-worn walls. Historically you may call this Bothwell Castle — but if such could be a poet's emblem, that broken tower I would name- -Robert Burns ! In the borders of the Black Forest there is an old 24 WAS BURNS COLOR-BLIND TO THE SEAt castle whose towers still rise high amid the lofty trees and crown the summit of a mountain which looks abroad over vast stretches of country once called Duchies, Kingdoms, Provinces. On the near hand are dark, rolling forests, breaking off at times against rocky prom- inences surmounted by other ancient strongholds, whose foundation stones were laid in the days of the Romans. Beneath nestles a charming green valley, sparkling with bright villas that mark the environs of the most famous watering place in Europe. To the west it looks down upon a magnificent plain, "rich with corn and wine," luxuriant with the life of scattered hamlets, towns and cities — a magnificent panorama spread out for near one hundred miles — the broad valley of the Rhine. Far beyond, the eye reaches, at the horizon, the distant wavy outline of the "Blue Alsatian Mountains." How many elements, both of grandeur and of beauty, doth this fair landscape comprise ! This castle, too, has had its history, its hot youth of ardent contest and defeat; but for the last two hundred years, from its grand seat, it has looked calmly down upon struggles that have convulsed empires. And yet, even in its decay, it is far from lifeless. Day by day it is sought by young and old alike. On the sunny slope of its terrace, we beheld gay pic-nic groups of pleasure seekers; through its winding courts strays wooing youth with maiden; while the inner hall, though roofless, resounded to our ears with the jocund laugh and happy sports of childhood. The artist, too, comes to fondly reproduce, on paper or canvas, its picturesque features or reminiscences of its old-time glories. More than this. Across all the grand, old, empty casements, deft hands have strung wires of differing size WAS BURNS COLOR-BLIND TO THE SEAi 25 and tension — "harps that the wandering breezes tune" — and now the old castle knows music sweeter far than was ever awakened by its harpers of old, as the rising or falling winds steal softly or sweep grandly across the chords of these harps of ^Eolus; now weird and low, and anon swelling in magnificent diapason which reverberates through all its ancient arches, and again subsiding in tender cadence inexpressibly plaintive and touching. To me, no organ peal resounding amid the dim aisles of vast cathedral, no "Bird's clearest carol by fall or by swelling, Such magical sense conveys," as these "airs from heaven" ringing their own melody! There is naught like it but — the poet of fourscore years singing at eventide, who, as the nearing shades of the dark forest fall upon him, yet looks trustfully out upon the beautiful plain, bright with the beams of the setting sun — and onward to the peaks of the Delectable Moun- tains bathed in sunset's gold. Still singing because it is in his heart to sing ! Over there they may call this castle the "Alt Schloss Hcehenbaden," but, if this too could be assigned as Poet's emblem, in fancy truer I would name it from loved bard of our own land — Whittier ! Would that the grand name and fame which in future will so justly attach to his, could as worthily rest with thy memory, poor Bobbie Burns! SCOTT-LAND. (From a lecture delivered at the State University of Kansas.) A New World — the Realm of Books ! Broad conti- nents whose teeming plains or Hesperidean valleys yield the ripened grain or golden fruits of Knowledge; — great seas traversed by a thousand argosies which bear home- ward from far-off isles or dim mysterious shores the strange, rich treasures of Imaginative Thought ! Such isles of Romance — such plains of Verity — have been brought within your ken, young student of Kansas University ! Such New World you perchance discovered, Columbus-like, and made it your own, when, for the first time, you entered the confines of a room below — The Library ! In the long years before you, it may be your fortune to receive many varied and rich impressions. It were little, indeed, to say that scarce shall one arrive to you that may not remind you of something already traced in yonder volumes. Traversing to the Atlantic and then across its bounds, you may one day attain to that much desired haven of the American scholar — the Old World of Europe. Standing in certain rooms of the old Tower of London, the Museum Johannes at Dresden, or the Invalides of Paris, you may gather new impressions like the rays of light reflected to your eyes from countless gleaming arms and armor. Like Longfellow at Springfield, you exclaim: • '■ This is the Arsenal— from floor to ceiling, Like a vast organ, rise the burnished arms ! " 26 SCOTT-LAND. 27 Insensible then, indeed, were you to a thousand historic memories, could you fail to be impressed by the number- less trophies which Time has wrested from the nerveless grasp of mighty warriors of the ages past, from the days of Cceur-de-Lion to Napoleon the Great. "Departed spirits of the mighty dead" — these, their battle-axe and sword and shield, and not the marble mausoleum reared "amid the long drawn aisle and fretted vault," — these are their fitting monument. Heroes of old, peace to your ashes ! "Your good swords rust, Your steeds are dust. Your souls are with the saiuts, we trust I *' But standing beneath the dome of the British Museum, or in the rooms of the Bodleian at Oxford — noting the vast multitude of books piled, range upon range, "from floor to ceiling," while, near by, hundred of cases preserve rare manuscripts that date centuries back of the oldest printed volumes, with autographs of famous kings and still more famous Kings of Letters — you shall scarce fail to be moved to a tenfold greater degree than by any trophies of military greatness, however memorable. These, you exclaim, are the forces that shall influence the world hereafter — the weapons of Knowledge. " This is the Arsenal, these the burnished arms ! " And yet, if I may gauge your feelings by mine own, I should say that even then your enthusiasm might scarce renew, much less surpass that of your earlier days, when first made free of the University Library. After all, a well selected list of *five thousand volumes comprises the heart of the world's literature, and the first rich zest of the seeking mind is scarce to be transcended. *Now (1S90) Increased to 11.000 volumes. 28 SCOTT-LAND. As fresh and fair as ever to me is that bright day of boyhood when first I entered a quiet room in an old, brick farm-house in Quaker Pennsylvania and, coming into the possession which a season ticket in its circulating library of i, 600 volumes gave me, went forth from that day into a strange new world — into ••That new world which was the old.'" Exploring the wide confines of that world, I one day discovered a new Kingdom — Scott-land ! In all the grand realms of literature, the bright sun of genius illumed no land more fair — among all the spells of Romance, to me none more potent than that cast by the mighty magician, the Wizard of the North ! Poesy, History, Romance; wondrous legend, impas- sioned rhetoric, inspiring thought; these were so wonder- fully woven, so inextricably blended, you knew not of the three-fold spell which element was the most powerful nor which held the greatest charm ! He tells of his mythical wizard of the same patro- nymic, Sir Michael Scott, such was his magic power, •■ That when in Salamanca's cave He list his niagic wand to wave, The bells would ring in Notre Dame." But what was this compared with the "magic of the mind" exercised by the real Wizard, who, when he lifted his magic wand — the pen — could ring for us the bells of every land from Scotland to Palestine, until we heard the swell of St. Mary's in fair Melrose chiming in unison with those that hung in the minarets of St. Jean D'Acre ! '• Bells of the Past, whose long-forgotten music Still fills the wide expanse, Tingeing the sober twilight of the Present With color of romance. 11 SCOTT-LAND. 29 With that magic music ringing in our ears, come trooping forth a wondrous procession, the marvellous yet material inhabitants of Scott-land ! Before us throng the people of differing races, climes and ages, beginning with the Waverley, whose date to the author's day was but " Sixty Years Since," and extending back into the remote, yet not dim perspective of king and swineherd of the Norman Conquest; the hermit- saint, the Red-Cross knight, and turbaned Turk of the days of the Crusades. In fancy compelled, we follow Richard of the Lion Heart to the plains of Palestine, and with him storm the walls of Acre or hold courteous parley with the princely paynim Saladin ! Anon, we are back on English ground, and with gallant Ivanhoe overthrow Bois-Guilbert and Front-de-Boeuf in the tourney lists of Ashby-de-la- Zouche, whilst the fair daughter of Isaac of York looks fearfully on and stately lady Rowena gives the victor's prize ! We scale, with young Arthur Phillipson, the crags of Switzerland, to win the smile of sweet Anne of (ieierstein, and, at midnight, we are silently lowered with his father, the fearless old Karl of Oxford, into the underground chambers of the dreaded Vehm-Gericht of German}' '. With stout Smith-of-the-Wynd we fight along with Clan Quehele and thirst for the extermination of the last intervening champion of Clan Chattan, that we may get one stroke at their recreant chief, the whilom glover's apprentice ! 'We follow the fickle fortunes of Sir Nigel through fierce Alsatia, as we do the wandering steps of bold Quentin Durward through foreign Flanders and fair France ! With rugged Balfour of Burley we wield the "sword of the Lord and of Gideon" against the troopers of bloody Claverhouse, at the battle of 30 s/ OTT-LAND. Bothwell Brig ! Again the sound of revelry is heard, and with the false Earl of Leicester we welcome to Kenil- worth Castle, with pomp and rejoicing, "Good Queen Bess," learned and vain, amorous, haughty, and mean, while poor Amy Robsart, the deserted and ill-fated countess, is treacherously dismissed, to mingle her falling tears with the "dews of summer night that fall," at Cumnor Hall. With Julian Avenel and bold Catherine Seyton we conspire to release Mary Stuart from her prison of Lochleven Castle, and the spell of the author over us is as the witchery of the fascinating queen upon the boy page, that whilst her dark guilt is intimated, her misfor- tunes and her magnetism obscure our better judgment, and we, too, are ready to do and to dare everything to save her from her impending, inevitable fate ! Away from lake to the Highlands, in whose fastnesses we lose ourselves with that unique soldier of fortune, Sir Dugald Dalgetty, and vanish with the Children of the Mist, whilst the baying of pursuing bloodhounds is faintly heard in distant defiles below ! We dine with Dandie Dinmont, or taste the witch's broth that Meg Merrilies pours scalding into the smuggler's throat, while Dominie Sampson exclaims "Prodigious;" or with faithful, lying, old Caleb Balderstone, we steal the roasted fowls from the spit, for our master's honored guests — a light foil of humor which more completely shades the dark tragedy of Ravenswood and poor Lucy of Lamraermoor. We follow on foot, from "within a mile of Edinboro' Town" all the way to London, the true hearted, the noble though lowly-born Jennie Deans, till we secure from the gracious Queen a pardon for erring sister Effie ! We — but it is useless and time fails to recall more of the thousand "beautiful pictures that hang on memory's SCOTT-LAND. 31 wall" in the enchanted chambers of that grand old feudal castle, stormed and ruled by the founder of Abbotsford — the Castle of Historic Romance, wherein preserved are all that was best, bravest and most beautiful of all the centuries of Feudalism; for it was to this historic feudal era that belonged the genius of Sir Walter Scott, who lived the century after its departure, but in time to be moulded and swayed by its charm to its perfect revela- tion: •• For all his life the charm did talk About his path— and hover near. With words of promise in his walk. And whispered voices at his ear.'" And like the enchanted palace to the Fairy Prince, this feudal castle opened to his magic key; from long-century sleep, its voices woke, • And buzzed and clacked. And all the long-pent stream of life. Dashed downward in a cataract. " ^^^^^^^^■^ And yet, though the kingdom of Scott was wider than the breadth of Europe, there was one little province which, while on its extreme western marge, was yet its center, its heart; and though the least in circumference was by far the greatest of all — little Scotland. Scotland with one "t" ! Macedonia of old, was greater than all the rest of Alexander's world beside, for it bred and inspired Alex- ander: Rome, than all the rest of the great Roman Empire; little England, than the whole of vast India, Australia and all the islands of the sea. And the land of Sir Walter Scott was, above all else, the little rugged province of his home and love: •• Land of brown heath and shaggy wood. Land of the mountain and the flood." o 2 SCOTT-LAND. And so, the genuine lover of Scott has found his dearest imagination ever turning away, from desert of Syria, though traversed by Richard of the Lion Heart and the brave Knight of the Leopard; from peaks of Switzerland; from sunny plains of France; from lawless Whitefriars; from lonely midnight rambles in the Park of Woodstock; from gay joust and tournament on the field of "Ashby-de- la-Zouche; from queenly revels even in the halls of Kenilworth; back to that picturesque region of mist and mountain and moorland, where, irradiated with the finest glow of the Author's magic fancy, '• Every rock and hill and stream Appareled with celestial light did seem The glory and the freshness of a dream." GEORGE FOX AND HIS JOURNAL. Up in the garret of the old Pennsylvania farm-house in which I was born, I made discovery, very early in my boyhood days, of a wonderful book. It was a musty, antiquated volume, that had come down from I know not what ancestor, printed at least a century before, in the old-fashioned type wherein the "s" and "f" are insep- arably confused to the modern eye; a bulky and ponderous quarto, about the size originally of "the family Bible that lay on the stand" down stairs. A homely old book, with its heavy, coarse, whitey-brown, uncalendered paper — the front one of its leather covers departed, and with it some of the earlier pages beside. But this ragged old volume, or what was left of it, was a veritable mine of romance to my youthful imagination, as much so as any rare edition of Froissart to the antiquary, or a fragment of Thomas the Rhymer to Sir Walter Scott. In the early spring or late autumn, when the farm work was apt to be interrupted by storms, I sought the old garret and devoured the pages — reading them many times over I dare say, often oblivious to the passing hours, and turning the leaves at last with fingers chilled, numb and blue. Some forty-odd years have passed since then, but still the vision of the old attic comes freshly back to-day: its bare shingles and rafters overhead, the old spinning-wheel and reel in one corner, a discarded meal chest for a table, and the wonderful book, which I 4 33 34 GEORGE FOX AND HIS JOURNAL. seem ever reading in association with that most melodious of musical monotones, the patter of the rain drops on the roof. Now this remarkable work, for such I considered it, and so it seems to me even yet, was none of those famous, old-time classics of boyhood, "The Arabian Nights," --Robinson Crusoe," ''Pilgrim's Progress," nor yet "Don Quixote," nor even the half-historic, half- mythic "Lives" of Plutarch, but merely the autobiog- raphy of a man who began life as a shoemaker's apprentice and ended it as a Quaker preacher — the "Journal of George Fox." It was the simple life record of the founder of Quakerism. But to begin jwith, it had one great, rightful hold on the mind of youth (say what we may as to a child's fondness for fiction), it was all true, or at least the earnest writer firmly believed it to be true, which, I take it, is about the same in effect to a boy of ten. Moreover, it was no tame and tedious recital of ministerial wanderings and ponderings. There was much in it I could not understand, but it was brim full of incident and adventure, bursts of rugged, untaught elo- quence, and passages of kindling fire, where fervid rhapsody seemed mounting into inspired sublimity. The writer had traversed all of Great Britain and many other countries beside, and wherever he went had created a sensation, a tumult, a whirlwind; had gone unannounced and uninvited into "steeple houses" (as he termed the churches), and, like Christ in the Temple, had therein boldly denounced the traffickers in religion; had stood in the market-places and highways and reproved the besetting- sins of the people; had challenged the authority of Chief Justice of England, and, in person or by message, had sharply catechized or prophetically warned lord protec- GEORGE FOX AND HIS JOURNAL. 35 tors, crowned kings and sovereign pontiffs of Rome. He had slept under hedges and refuged in ditches; had been literally floored by the Bible in the hands of infuriated clergymen whom he had just effectually •• floored" in discussion; had been stoned and beaten, well nigh murdered by raging populace; dragged to jails by rude soldiery — loathsome jails, whose horrors are happily unimagined in these days — languished therein for months and years, and, when finally released, renewed his life-work as fresh, as unconquerable as ever. Again, he was a seer and a prophet: had wonderful visions, wrought miracles, invoked judgments, and foretold miseries and destructions to come. But time would fail to catalogue a tithe of his doings, or adequately describe his wonderful Journal, whose chief merit, after all, is the key it furnishes as to the inner history of that interesting sect — the Quakers. What constitutes Quakerism ? The ordinary observer of externals merely, might give as incorrect an answer as if he should describe the fruit of the cocoa-palm by its outer covering — something uniformly, homely and dry, hard and husky; yet to those familiar with the real nature, the same shell or outer garb would be suggestive of the cool, refreshing richness within, while the beau- teous and luscious odored pomegranate should prove worthless save to scent and sight. Though these odd and quaint externals may seem absurd to the multitude, they all had, once at least, the significance of vital principles, which the wearers were willing to uphold through persecution unto death, and are, perhaps, the useless, well-nigh obsolete coverings of a religious faith very much like Christianity in its original purity, and as lovely as the world e'er saw ! The rise of the people called Quakers was one of the 36 GEORGE FOA' AND HIS JOURNAL. greatest anomalies of any age. In the midst of a violent civil war — the first great Revolution of England — when every man's hand was against his neighbor, sprang up this sect, one of whose leading principles was the total abandonment of brute force and the substitution of peace and good-will for the sword and cannon. Whilst Church- man, Papist, Presbyterian, Independent and Anabaptist, alternately fought and prayed, rose up and trampled each other down; whilst Cavalier and Roundhead, Charles the First and Prince Rupert, Fairfax and Cromwell were crimsoning with fraternal blood the fields of Marston Moor, Naseby, Preston, Worcester and Dunbar, to establish a kingdom or a republic that might last but for a day, these obscure people were inaugurating a real, though silent revolution which (only partially consum- mated it is true) has yet overturned thrones, freed millions of slaves, and in the practice of national arbitrament may yet put an end to all wars and fightings, " Till the war-drum throb no longer, and the battle flags are furled In the Parliament of Man— the Federation of the World ! " It was time for a new dispensation or a revival of the old in its purity. Out of all the ecclesiastical rubbish of the age, the debris of former systems and superstitions, what was there left to build on as from the beginning? Simply the reason — the soul of man — and its author. Tradition may fade away in the lapse of time, the written word may be misinterpreted or falsified, but God will not leave us without the living witness in our hearts. If we will be watchful and obedient to this light of truth, which is the Divine, the universal reason operating on our hearts and consciences, it will in time lead us into all truth; our spiritual perceptions growing day by day as we conform our lives to their teachings. The spirit of God GEORGE FOX AND HIS JOURNAL. 37 that inspired in the past is still universally present in the hearts of men, and Revelation is not a closed book. Such was the faith of the Quakers ! Turn we now to the founders of this faith. We might classify the three who stand out prominently as the great leaders in its origin in English history, the three great lights (besides the inner light) of Quakerism: George Fox, the prophet and preacher; Robert Barclay, the scholar and writer; William Penn, the colonizer and statesman. Not that this classification is complete and distinctive, for there was a blending of different charac- teristics in all. Though pre-eminently a teacher of religion, Fox was also a vigorous and prolific writer and an executive framer of no mean order, for chiefly he originated the policy and government of the society. Robert Barclay, of Uri, the descendant of a noble, old family, memorable in Scottish history, was a noted preacher and propagandist, though decidedly the scholar and most able literary defender of their principles; while the acute intellect and high culture of William Penn rendered him eminent in every field of labor into which his ardent enthusiasm carried him, though now chiefly known to the world as the successful founder of the great Quaker Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Of these three, time allows but a brief glance at one, and it will properly be directed to the great and original genius, George Fox, the founder. Born in 1624 in Leicestershire, the son of an honest weaver called by his neighbors, after the fashion of those days, "Righteous Christer," and his mother of the stock of the martyrs, he was from early childhood a grave, serious lad; faithful, earnest, conscientious, pure and delicate minded, shunning all evil associations. His friends thought the career of a minister indicated for 38 GEORGE FOX AND HIS JOURNAL. him, but were persuaded otherwise, and he was apprenticed to a shoemaker, who also fed and dealt largely in sheep. His employer entrusted much business to him, which was faithfully transacted, and it was well known that when George Fox said "verily " there was no moving him. At the age of nineteen, noting the inconsistent conduct of life of professedly religious people, he fell into deep trouble of mind over the vanities of the world, and having cried unto the Lord, he was commanded to forsake and become a stranger to them all. Obeying the voice, he left his relatives and friends, and for years wandered to and fro, often in the fields, woods and solitary places of the country side, and sometimes buried himself in the greater wilderness and loneliness of London. He fasted much; he meditated and prayed; he longed for a knowledge of the great mystery of existence, its aims and ends. He sought knowledge of the clergy. One advised him to marry; another to join Cromwell's army; still another would have him be bled and take medicine. (In those days even the ministers would give physic to a mind diseased.) Failing in obtaining light from the churchmen, he turned to the Dissenters, who seemed earnest and zealous, but soon became convinced that they were themselves still in darkness and could not speak to his condition. Saddened, he sought solitude again, and struggled alone with the problems that were pressing on him for solution. Sometimes, breaking through the gloomy clouds that encompassed him, gleams of celestial light shone in, irradiated the dark places of his soul and possessed him with a heavenly joy. In such seasons of retirement from the active world, amid conflicting and alternating temptations and exaltations of the soul, the great religions of the world have been born. At last, to GEORGE FOX AND HIS JOURNAL. 39 the earnest seeker, amid the calm and silence of nature, falls upon the waiting heart "the still small voice" of God. So it seemed to George Fox that, "through many alternations of hopes and fears, his seeking mind was gently led along to principles of endless and eternal love." He was taught that "there was an authority in man to teach him that God would himself instruct his people without the intervention of university - taught priest; that none can be ministers of Christ but in the Eternal Spirit, which was before the Scriptures were given forth; that there is no holy ground in church or temple, but only in people's hearts." Confident of the truth of revelations that had given peace to his soul and gladness to his heart, he felt impelled to go forth and proclaim the glorious truth to the world. In his own language: "Thus travelled I on in the Lord's service as the Lord led me ! I was to bring people up from all the world's religions, which were vain, that they might know the true religion — might visit the fatherless, the widow and the orphan, and keep themselves from the spots of the world. I was to bring them up from the world's fellowships, prayings and singings, which stood in form without power; from Jewish ceremonials; from heathenish fables: from men's inventions and windy doctrines, which blow people about from sect to sect; from all their images, crossings and sprinklings, with their holy days so-called, and all their vain traditions which they had got up since the Apostles' days." In other words, George Fox was to preach a religion outside of churches, rites and creeds; a gospel of humanity, whose seed was universally implanted, and destined to grow and blossom and fruit into the practical, 4 o GEORGE FOX AND HIS JOURNAL. worthy living of lives patterned after that which Christ led upon the earth. That God is the universal loving Father and all mankind one brotherhood, was not merely a fine theory with George Fox. In every act of his life he sought to give that practical exemplification of his belief, which is usually the most obnoxious form in which we can express our radical ideas. Sir Henry Vane was an advanced republican of those days, but he could treat Fox with severity for not removing his hat in "his honor's" presence. On the other hand, it reads rather singularly, in the wonderful Journal, when we often find the great historic "Protector" of England referred to as simple "O.Cromwell." The title of "Friend" was the address adopted universally by the Quakers to emphasize the great principle, "all men are equal by their birth." Whilst reverencing the Scriptures, Fox freely denounced the Bible idolatry so prevalent in his day, and not totallv extinct in ours. As he heard the bells of Nottingham Church, near the home of his boyhood, calling the people together, "the sound struck to his heart, for it was like a market bell assembling them for the priest to offer his wares — the Scriptures — for sale." One First-day morning he was moved to go to the great "steeple-house" and cry against their idol. "When I came there," says Fox, "all the people looked like fallow ground, and the priest, like a huge lump of earth, stood in his pulpit above. He took for his text those words of Peter, 'We also have a more sure word of prophecy,' and told them this was the Scriptures, by which we were to try all doctrines, religions and opinions. Now the Lord's power was so mighty upon me and so strong in me that I could not hold, but was made to cry out, ' Oh no, it is not the Scriptures; it is the Spirit.'" This was GEORGE FOX AND HIS JOURNAL. 4 1 hte seed of a great religious revolution. As a great writer has expressed it: "The Bible enfranchises only those to whom it is sent; Christianity those only to whom it is made known; the creed of a sect those only within its narrow pale. But George Fox, resting his system on the Inner Light, redeems the race." On the hills of Yorkshire he had a vision of the great work of God in the earth, seeing the people thick as motes in the sunbeam that should be brought home to the Lord, that there might be but one Shepherd and one sheep-fold in all the earth. Possessed with such enthusiasm, no wonder that neither raging priest nor stoning populace could daunt him ! On he went in his divinely-appointed mission, and as he rode "the seed of the Lord sparkled about him like innumerable sparks of fire." The clergy, who at first provoked discussion with him, soon learned to shun the unequal encounter; they trembled and went away at his approach, and "it was a dreadful thing unto them when they were told that the man with leather breeches was come. " Through fiery trials, the sect that he founded (I term it a sect, though a creedless one) grew and pros- pered and multiplied into thousands and tens of thousands. In fact as many as 4,000 of them were at one time in prison. At last, a part found a home in the Xew World, and fair Pennsylvania offered a peaceful refuge not only to themselves, but under their laws to the persecuted of every sect, where every man was secured the right to worship God according to the dictates of his own con- science. THE QUAKER WEDDING. No wedding bells rang out in air, No strains of music blended, No orange blossoms decked her hair, Nor bridal veil descended: The bridegroom to the bride gave naught Of symbol ring or token, No rite was with tradition fraught, No churchly vows were spoken. With all that ritual imparts, Performed with pomp and splendor, No tie unites two loving hearts Like simple words and tender. It needs not old cathedral rare, Nor tones of organ pealing, To sanctify the pledge they share, Or wake the soul's deep feeling. So "in the presence of the Lord" And loving friends around them, Their own lips spoke each solemn word That, life to life, hath bound them ! 42 TWO SCHOOLS OF FICTION. As the era of Phidias was the golden age of Sculpture; as the period of the Renaissance comprehended the palmy days of Painting; as the age of Elizabeth signal- izes ever the glory of the Drama; as the first half of the nineteenth century stands eminently prolific in Poetry; so the present, its latter half, is distinctively the era of the Novel. If the harvests of the Imagination in Literature have heretofore been garnered from the fields of Song, either we are now suffering the reaction and rest of nature in a period of dearth and famine, or else, while those fields of Poesy lie fallow for a season, the reapers and the wagons have been diverted to other fertile plains — the fair, broad acres of Romance. Is it a question of alternate seven years of famine following closely the seven years of plenty, or, more haply, a matter of rotation of crops in literary agriculture? This is a question I still leave with the reader for final determination, simply expressing, in passing, my humble opinion that Imagination and Fancy are yet neither dead nor sleeping, but daily walking abroad among the children of men. Nothing is more wonderful than the rapid development in this age of the idea of the Novel — its scope and its responsibilities. Formerly its function was but to amuse and entertain. The tales of fiction were like those of 43 44 TWO SCHOOLS OF FICTION. the Arabian Nights or the Decameron — recounted by some smiling, light-hearted, light-tongued Scheherezade or Boccacio — the careless "singer of an empty day." Now its province has been immensely extended. One outlying principality after another has been annexed, until it has come to embrace pretty much all the literary kingdom, and with this idea of its increased scope and power, comes that also of its added duties and responsi- bilities. Good fiction "is profitable for instruction, for reproof, for doctrine," and, like the "perfect woman" of Wordsworth, it should be i; Nobly planned To warn, to comfort and command." With all the burning questions of Biology, Psychology and Theology pressing close upon us now in our daily lives, we need all the added illumination that the side- lights of Literature can throw upon them; hence we are inclined to welcome the tendency of jurists and divines to gather texts for decisions and sermons from the master-pages of fiction. The Study of Fiction has, indeed, become of such prime importance that, together with the study of "Shakespeare and the Musical-Glasses," Fluxions, the Binomial Theorem, the "Fourth Dimension" and Italian Renaissance, it should be included in the Curriculum of all our Public Schools. In making this suggestion, I by no means blink the recognized fact that the schedule of studies pursued by our youth is already so extensive as seriously to overcrowd their time and capacities. In order, therefore, to make room for these modern and more important studies, I would lop off several of the old- fashioned and nearly obsolete ones, beginning with "the three R's ! " TWO SCHOOLS OF FICTION. 45 It was said by Shakespeare — or the other fellow — that "all mankind loves a lover." And somebody else has remarked that no novel or romance is complete that does not embrace the subject of love. We are then enabled to assert that all mankind loves a good story. It is pretty safe to assume this. The taste for a good story, together with that for a good dinner, is, perhaps, more nearly universal than any other. ."We may live without poetry, music or art" — in fact, a great many people do get along without any of these very passably indeed — but this age is pre-eminently one of story-writing and of story-reading enjoyment. Some one has asserted that even judges of the highest courts recreate themselves by reading romances, and a judge of the United States District Court in Kansas recently showed his familiarity with one romance at least by citing from the strange case of — "Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde." . The taste for and the habit of story-reading is spreading to be almost universal. The leaves of the paper novel are shed abroad far thicker than the "leaves of Vallambrosa;" they fall alike "on the just and the unjust. " The cabinet officer, and the elevator boy who may one day rise to the top story (one story beyond the high official) and come to own a "cabinet" of his own — both of these alike indulge in the relaxations of romance. The library of every household swarms with the Household Library. When we go out we find that the Franklin Square lays over every little park in city or town, whilst The Seaside pursues us through every summer resort, and follows us into the fastnesses of the mountains. And conversely, while directly in obedience to the law of demand and supply, about everybody who does not read novels (except, perhaps, the critic) has gone to 4 6 TWO SCHOOLS OF FICTION. writing them. No literary reputation is complete now-a- days unless it has been topped out with a romance. All the poets and poetesses finally abandon their verse, proceed to join the less tuneful choir, and swell a chorus not their own. Possibly romance pays the best. Undoubtedly it pays the best. "A rose by any other name would smell as sweet," but had the two Roes-es — he of the Hudson, and he, the smartly imitative Chicago namesake — got them- selves planted in the gardens of poesy, instead of realistic romance, they might long ago have wilted on their stems, lacking all sweet savor of interest to reader or publisher. All the authors are turning to the novel. Even Amelie Rives Chanler has tried her hand at it. Senator Ingalls has been about it for a long time, but unfortunately — or fortunately — for the world and his fame, the manuscript, like the first of Carlyle's " French Revolution," went up in the flames. The luckless man who writes — or buys — a poem now-a-days may come to find himself in the category of the doubting lady I met in a picture store the other day. She had had thoughts of buying an etching, but she was afraid they would "go out ! " The novel is fast assuming, like Lord Bacon, to take all knowledge for its province. If a man wishes to propound a new fact or a new theory, if he has explored a new continent or a new province of thought, he hastens to exhibit it to the world, thinly disguised, it may be, under the veil of fiction. If his style be passably attractive, he wins a hearing for himself and his* pet, and an audience of readers probably ten times as great as if he had addressed himself in the old-fashioned method, to his special clientele. . The youth, at least, of this country, have hitherto TWO SCHOOLS OF FICTIOX. 47 learned far more about the interior of the "Dark Conti- nent" from the pages of Thomas W. Knox, (in "The Boy Travellers,") than from the books of Livingstone and Stanley, while, of maturer minds, hundreds to one prefer to read "-Robert Elsmere and "John Ward," to tracts on "Miracle," or ••Future Punishment." Charles Dickens assailed Yorkshire schools, imprisonment for debt, Chancery courts and Gradgrind Realism — while Charles Reade attacked the abuses of insane asylums, trades-unions and the prison "solitary system," from the vantage-ground of fiction, with correspondingly wonderful effect. Who would not choose to write the romantic story of "Uncle Tom's Cabin," and thereby arouse a whole nation to feeling and action, rather than to deliver tracts and facts to people of previous anti-slavery antecedents? A few years ago, William Dean Howells, himself our leading story writer, took it upon him to issue, as one having authority, a proclamation to all the inhabitants of the land of Fiction, or those who should come to sojourn therein. It comprehended a notable announcement, and was, at the same time, both a requiem and a paean of rejoicing. "Great Pan was dead" — the days of Romantic Fiction were over ! For many days it had, indeed, been nothing but a farrago of romantic bosh and hash; now, peace be to its hashes ! The past of fiction should be as "a tale that is told;" in fact its stories — the stories — had all been told. There were left no new plots and incidents — all had been exhausted. Now they were simply being rehashed over and over again by the story writers. Invention had reached its limit, Scott and Dickens and Thackeray, 4 8 TWO SCHOOLS OF FICTION. and all their followers were obsolete or obsolescent. It was time for a new dispensation; there was a New Dispensation, that of wholesome Realism, and Henry James was its prophet — of whom, he, Howells, was proud to enrol himself as the first disciple ! This pronunciamento was duly followed, from time to time, by others from his pen, elaborating and fortifying his theory, and ably expounding the gospel of Realism. Also he began to cast his nets around in the deep and shallow waters of Literature, and successfully and suc- cessively to land several realistic fish of greater or less degree, some of whom proved literary leviathans in breadth, and others "very like a whale, indeed:" — Tur- genieff and Tolstoi, of Russia; Flaubert, of Paris; Valdez, of Spain; and E. W. Howe, of Atchison, Kansas. And the literary world was, for a time, very willing to give some credence to this new creed, and a patient hearing to its advocates. In fact, we had previously grown a little tired of the romantic school, since most of its great masters had passed away. Its second rate fellows scarce charmed us at all. They possessed not "the grand style. " What in their works was old, became too trite in their hands. They had exhausted most of the old-time plots and devices, and especially all the old life-saving apparatus, by means of which the hero rescues the heroine and gains her eternal gratitude and love. All such had become too frightfully familiar and worn to be serviceable any longer. On the other hand, their new tricks and spasms, their violent exaggerations, distor- tions and monstrosities were apt to be so wild and fantastic as to strain entirely too hard upon our imagina- tions. These writers had developed and educated a class of novel readers which is one of the special characteris- T WO SCHOOLS OF FICTION. ^ tics of the age, the habitual novel-reader. A class which loves stories for their sensationalism, and lives upon it, as an opium or hashish-eater lives upon his drug and its excitement, having lost relish for anything more wholesome and nutritious. This class, which still abounds in every community where there is a circulating library or a "news-stand," is constrained by the force of habit and the condition of mind induced by such reading, to rush pell-mell through one story after another, never halting to enjoy a charm of style or happy touch of characterization, but always in pursuit of incident, plot and sensation. Their minds, in time, acquire a sieve-like property that lets every story through, in turn, as fast as poured in. But even the "circulating-library-fiend" was inclined to welcome something new. In fact, like the Athenians of old, they are always looking for some new thing. For awhile, everybody took their regular instalments of Howells, James, et id omne genus, the New School of Fiction, with zeal and apparent zest. Under the stimulus of the New Idea, wonderful results were reached, espe- cially in the literary development of its two great exemplars. The world had long admired the early work of these brilliant writers; the purity of style, the wealth of observation, the keenness of analysis. In Howells, especially, one experienced a charm of freshness and originality, a delicacy and nicety of touch, united with a geniality of feeling, which was extremely fascinating. Beginning with his earlier sketches, particularly "Their Wedding Journey," and its continuation, "A Chance Acquaintance," this culminated in the "Lady of the Aroostook," a story which, simply and delicately told, without making any pretence of breadth of treatment, 5 5o TWO SCHOOLS OF FICTION. and exhibiting but few characters, yet discriminated them so finely and handled them all so admirably as to give fair promise of the highest literary eminence for the writer, in the near future. Has that promise been fulfilled ? Let the descending curve that has led so swiftly adown the slope to the dreary flats of "Annie Kilburn" afford the answer ! For Henry James, his " Bostonians" settled the question some years ago — and his partial struggles into pseudo-sensationalism of late will scarce retrieve him. If we should venture to render the historical verdict, it would be "Killed by a Theory," the theory that Realism in Literature is the only supreme good. Too much exclu- sive holding up a looking-glass before a very indifferent and common-place Nature ! — And the Romantic Fiction that should have been entombed by these men was soon on its feet again, livelier than ever ! A new crop of romantic story-tellers has sprung up like Jonah's gourd, and gained already a multitude of readers and lovers — "Called Back" Conway, "Strange Case" Stevenson, and that haggardest of blood-thirsty, story-telling fiends, Rider Haggard. Their recent popu- larity sprang into such immense proportions, as only to be accounted for, possibly, as a reactionary protest against the extreme and exclusive realism which had prevailed before. But this later school of romantics is itself in turn too violent in force and too extreme in direction, and as such cannot long endure. In fact, just at present, it might seem as if we had entered a notable period of psycho- theologic fiction. ~^' *•' 5k >k ^' 5k 5k 5fe *k Since the above was written, Mr. Howells has published TWO SCHOOLS OF FICTION. 5I a new story — "A Hazard of New Fortunes" — which, virile and inclusive in grasp and treatment, fulfills the promise of his earlier days, and places him conspicuously in the front rank of American writers. This exemplifies that in literature, as in metereology, an ascending curve may closely succeed one of descent, and regain all that had been lost thereby. In view of his increased breadth and vigor, we shall scarce complain, indeed, that in this most "modern instance," he has left the realistic restrictions of inherent probability so far behind him as to bring together unap- pointed, from remote parts of the city to a certain street- corner in upper Xew York, no less than three of his principal characters, at the precise moment which awaited a "striking." denouement! Nor even that in another recent story, he should employ a literal tour de force of the most violent character, to relieve himself at once of his hero and a dilemma ! We cordially accept William Dean Howells as our Dean of Fiction in the University of Literature — but what especially pleases us in him, of late, is that he is so delightfully romantic. Not alone in his sentiment — he was often deliciously romantic in that before — but lately, in his incident as well ! if;:*::};****** A cursory examination of a few of the noted masters of fiction in the past generation may not be out of place, but must be very briefly taken. What part, conscious or unconscious, did this question of realism or romance have in the production of fiction in that era ? Evidently the drift of Sir Walter Scott's genius in fiction was essentially romantic. While he naturally sought epochs in history wherein the spirit of the time - 2 TWO SCHOOLS OF FICTION. was congenially of that order — such as the era of the Crusades — or, at least, so far remote in the past as to allow full license to the imagination in treating them as suc h — as for instance, the Feudal ages — yet even when he lays his scenes in periods as nearly modern as those included in the last century, the Great Wizard is able to cast such a glamor of romance over prosaic times and humble events as to make them fairly glow in the magic of fancy — "the light that never was on sea or land." And yet, Scott has so deftly interwoven the warp and woof of fact and fiction, matched with the bright colors he could so skilfully impart; has gathered from old chronicle and legend so much that, whether true or not, bears the verisimilitude of truth, that his romances seem all infused with the hues of history, and if not "the very age and body of the time, its form and pressure," to be, at least, something so much finer, that we are more than willing to accept them in preference. While he, no doubt, illumines with a factitious, glow some of the dark pages of feudalism, yet many of his incidents of story are no more essentially romantic, after all, than those chronicled by Princess Anna Commena or Philippe de Comines. But it is not alone when "the pulse of life," in his magic creations, is "beating to heroic measure" that Walter Scott is truly great. When he portrays the fortunes and vicissitudes of that humble family of St. Leonard's Crags, the many homely touches of realism naturally incident to the daily life of Jeanie Deans, the cow-feeder's daughter, serve as a magnificent foil and charming back-ground to the noble purpose that animates her, and bring out all the more vividly, the glory of her achievement. ' * The Heart of Mid-Lothian " is a conspicuous example TWO SCHOOLS OF FICTION. 53 of what I consider the higher order of fiction — that in which fact and fancy, realism and romanticism mingle and harmoniously blend. If I were asked to cite a modern example of this felicitous combination, perchance the first one that would rise to mind would be " Lorna Doone," the single notable story that has yet been written by R. D. Blackmore. It is to this commingling of the two — though so often impaired in happy effect, by trick and exaggeration, by crudities and quiddities of characterization and vicious mannerisms of style — that may be attributed, as I deem, the popularity of Charles Dickens as a novelist. It would be difficult to tell whether he is most Idealist or Realist. No writer was ever more of the latter in his close observation and reproduction of unusual and odd types of character, but in sentiment and direction he was always thoroughly romantic. Had I time, I would gladly go into this farther, by way of illustration, but the numberless examples which might be adduced in proof will readily occur to all familiar with his writings. Thackeray was another great master; great in style and great in matter, because equally at home in either school of fiction — the two not exemplified so often by being intimately blended in the same novel, as in the pages of his great cotemporary. To give typical instances, I would cite "Vanity Fair" as one of the most character- istic examples of a realistic novel ever written, with " Henry Esmond" and " The Newcomes, " leaning closely to the romantic school. In all fiction where is there portrayed a finer character than Colonel Thomas New- come — so ideally grand and yet so essentially human in his imperfections ! In the same connection, let me revert again to Dickens, 54 TWO SCHOOLS OF FICTION. to cite the "Tale of Two Cities," as evincing most assured power as well as strength of style of any of his romantic tendencies, with "David Copperfield," as, perhaps, his finest union of the two schools — the realistic and romantic. Possibly the greatest name in purely romantic fiction, of the last generation, is that of Victor Hugo. In the old-time deadly conflict, between classicism and romanticism in the French drama, his was the embod- iment of the latter idea, and his the early triumph as its representative champion. Thenceforward, the contemner of the "Third Napoleon" was consistently of this school of literature. In Poetry, in Fiction, and in Fact (that is, as nearly as the great Frenchman ever touched an actual, prosaic fact) Victor Hugo was a Romanticist. In spite of its crying — and shrieking — defects of style, bordering often close upon the hysterical, "Les Miserables" remains one of the most wonderful products of imaginative genius. Charles Reade probably considered himself a realist of the first water, and indeed his style was eminently such, being arid in the extreme. His ideal of construction was also the acme of realism; it being his habit to accumulate first a mass of raw material, clippings from newspapers, and other sources, of such reported facts as struck him as available for novelistic purposes, especially if they bore on some pet theory which he desired to exemplify. These he would arrange in scrap-books on some system of Index Rerum. He had a veritable "Gradgrind" penchant for facts, and he had likewise a genius for utilizing them as a statistician does figures, so that they would tell a marvellous story — any kind of a story he wished. When this process of coloring and distorting TWO SCHOOLS OF FICTION. 55 the facts begins, he changes, chameleon-like, into the Romanticist, pure and simple. His characters, too, always act on the romantic plan, instead of that of natural development. His women, especially, can always be relied upon to do just the thing they logically should not; it being one of Reade's pet theories that all women are prone to act "like Paddy's pig," and that, in conse- quence, whenever you want them to go to Bantry you must pretend they are on the way to Cork. Both Reade and Wilkie Collins, however, are sufficient refutations of Howells' theory, that "the stories have all been told;" unless, indeed, he should put in the saving plea that such were among the rush of creditors who drew out the last coin, and left the bank of invention bursted. Both of these kept up telling interesting stories to the last, and Collins had always a big fund of incident, though his style, like that of the dictionary, may seem at times "a trine jerky." The mention of Charles Reade's scrap-books reminds one of Hawthorne's "Note-books," published after his death, and very unwisely, perhaps, for his best fame. We should have preferred to imagine those wonderful romances as projected, lava-like, from, the surging and overflowing crater of a passionate imagination fused and glowing at white heat, for they seem veritable products of secret seething recesses of heart and mind. Instead of this, the note-books take us into the romancer's larder and kitchen, where the apples, raisins and meat are being accumulated and chopped, and where the suet is being tried out and the brandy decanted; all of which, skilfully compounded and cooked up, should duly eventuate in the mince-pie of romance, that whilom we had found so toothsome. 56 TWO SCHOOLS OF FICTION. In his elaboration of detail — often wonderfully minute, sometimes apparently trivial, but all tending to heighten- ing of artistic effect — Hawthorne is a Realist. In his choice of out-of-the-way characters and unusual aspects of life, and their development into startling and tragic events, he is a Romanticist — but chiefly, in his study of the mysterious workings of mind, especially of the morbid and abnormal sort, he is a Psychologist. While a predominance in importance may be granted to the latter function, it is probably owing to the masterly blending of all these characteristics that we cede him high rank in literature. Eminent in differing departments of fiction, striking its leading chords of realism, romanticism or idealism to produce some of their finest tones at will, the psycholo- gist in George Eliot broadened out at last into the philosopher, whose subtle and profound reflections make us sometimes oblivious of the fact that it is a novel, a work of the imagination, that we are perusing. And yet, as the gifted writer carries us along with her in these excursions into the realms of deep thought, we seem to leave behind that ideal country wherein we first journeyed, and our guide loses somewhat of the artist in taking on so much of the metaphysician. For this reason, the earlier "Adam Bede" and "Felix Holt," possessing more romantic and human interest and using more direct story-telling power, strike me as altogether artistically finer than her later works. To leave the high table-lands which the mind of George Eliot inhabited, and come down to the actual misty headlands of the Atlantic and the wild shores of the Hebrides, William Black is one of the most agreeable and popular novelists of to-day of the romantic school; TWO SCHOOLS OF FICTION. 57 writing always with graceful pen "dipped in the hues of color" and of fancy — " Tingeing the sober twilight of the present With coloring of romance." But the atmosphere which should reflect the glow and the color is apt sometimes to become rather attenuated, being palpably evoked more through force of determina- tion of the writer than the power of assured imaginative genius. On the other hand, imagination itself, though a kingly power and prerogative in a romantic era, may scarce be safely substituted in picturing those types of a modern age wherein the correct results of the faithful observation of realism are imperatively required. As instances of imaginative pseudo-realism, one might cite Cooper's Indians and his Leather-stocking hero; Bret Harte's Cali- fornia miners; Cable's Acadians and Creoles, and William Hardy's Shakesperian rustics of to-day. These are all interesting as mental projections of genius— but they fail as veritable human beings. ******** Do novels of the Romantic school, as claimed by Mr. Howells, uniformly give us false views of life, influencing us to illogical, impractical and harmful course of action ? If so, his indictment of the school has great force. Possibly this objection may properly lie to much of the sensational literature of the day. It is hurtful to the minds alike of youth and children of a larger growth. But the assertion that all romantic literature is injurious is as untenable as might be the converse proposition that all realistic writing is beneficial — or that a chess-player's mind is so strengthened and disciplined by his pursuit that he may never make a false move in the game of life ! 5» TWO SCHOOLS OF FICTION. If nothing but realism be proper food for mind or soul, if imagination and fancy are to be wholly ruled out, let us drop professed fiction and rely solely on the daily news- paper for our mental nourishment. That is realistic enough in all conscience, and imaginative enough also, perhaps, during political campaigns. I would, however, maintain that romantic fiction of a high order may be most serviceable to us — even toward our apprehending life in many of its important relations. Oculists tell us, and experience confirms it, that it is better for us to have two eyes, and use them — even though one or both may be imperfect — than to rely on one alone, however complete its visual capacity. Somehow in the correlation of use, the faultiness of either will be measurably rectified, and we will have truer apprehension of the proper relations of visible objects. In like manner, it will be a gain to us to look at life through the window that the novelist opens to us, as well as through that of our every-day experience. It is well for us to contemplate the differing aspects of our existence; the usual and the unusual; the every-day and the gala- day; the near and the far. So shall we gain a truer vision, a broader outlook, a fuller comprehension of that complex landscape of the soul which we call human life. William C. Gannett, in that most helpful of all "prac- tical" sermons, "Blessed be Drudgery," has enjoined upon us this lesson, as the summing of the whole philos- ophy of contentment: "If you cannot realize your ideals, then idealize your reals ! " This is what the best novels — the combination of the romantic and realistic — may help us to do: to "idealize our reals." ******** In one of his earlier poems, Bret Harte pictures to us TWO SCHOOLS OF FICTION. 59 a California mining camp on the slopes of the Sierras, in the early days of the excitement and thirst for gold. Weary, worn and haggard from the toils and anxieties of the fierce pursuit, one night, around their camp fire, they listened to a younger member of the party, who produced from "his pack's scant treasure," a "hoarded volume" of Charles Dickens — the Story of Little Nell: ' ; Perhaps 'twas boyish fancy— for the reader Was youngest of them ail- But as he read, from clustering pine and cedar A silence seemed to fall ; The fir-trees, gathering closer in the shadows, Listened in every spray, — While the whole camp, with Nell — on English meadows, Wandered and lost their way. And so— in mountain solitudes,— o'ertaken, As by some spell divine. Their cares dropped from them— like the needles shaken. From out the gusty pine." Such is the spell of the Imagination, and such the compensations and solaces it sometimes bestows on the rudest and hardest of lives. What realist will dare deprive us o them all ! TWO TRAVELERS OF SUCH A CAST. The Psychologist and the Realist of literature some- times walk its great highways, side by side. They prefer to travel its dusty high road, because that is lined with the abodes of human life and crowded by its great throngs — and it is life, with its experiences, that is the object of their pursuit. It is that alone which is worth their study and admiration. For them, there is neither pleasure nor profit, neither poetry nor worthy prose in nature, uncon- nected directly with some individual, or type of the species Man. For them there is no "pleasure in the pathless woods;" there is no "rapture on the lonely shore;" there can be no "society where none intrudes, by the deep sea" — nor "music in its roar." In fact, it may well be doubted whether, in absence of human ears, there can exist any "roar" at all ! What a blunder in fact, and how utterly unpoetic in idea, those lines of Gray : " Full many a gem of purest ray serene, The dark unfathomed caves of ocean bear." How could they bear them, even in poetic fancy, so long as the caves are "unfathomed" by man? To these two confreres, there is no landscape or marine, however full of beauty or of grandeur; of mystery, of sentiment or of subtle suggestiveness; no canvas of Claude, of Rousseau or Corot, that the foolish world of fancy had been wont to term "poetic" — unless there haply be a piece of ". genre" painted as planted in the fore-ground. 60 TWO TRAVELERS OF SUCH A CAST. 6l Never in sublimest poetic fancy could they hear the "morning stars sing together for joy" — unless they, or some prototype of theirs, should be on hand, with sharp ears to hear, and a sharp pencil to take down the notes ! With one common aim, expressed by the phrase "to hold the mirror up to nature " — that Nature comprehended by the unit Man — these two travel together, along the highway for awhile, observing and noting the types as they pass them by. But the pace of the Realist is really the swifter, inasmuch as he is satisfied by catching the reflections of the looking-glass that he holds up, or the camera that he trains upon his victims. If he catch a fair and life-like image, which shall give representation of outward appearance, with all the characteristic attitude and gesture and individual action, the Realist is well content. Not so, for any length of time, the Psycholo- gist. His work goes far deeper and requires more time. He aims at complete analysis of the inner as well as outer self. He fain would dissect the "subject" completely, lay bare every quivering nerve, and turn the compound- microscope of critical observation upon each corpuscle of blood and every fiber of the heart, detecting the nature and course of the life-current, and every hidden spring of action. This takes more time than realism has to give, but who can doubt that the results are more complete ! When the Master is through, the process has been most thorough, indeed ! You can turn the dry- bones — all that is left — over to the Scientist now, if you can possibly find one so wholly devoid of imagination that he cares for nothing but to articulate skeletons. But be chary of terming this process of the anatomization of humanity Poetry — or conceiving that there is much poetry in it, much less of romance ! When you have got 62 TWO TRAVELERS OF SUCH A CAST. at the heart of all mystery in man's soul — and plucked all the mystery out of it — the poetry vanished just before; for without mystery, imaginative genius has no atmosphere to work in, and perishes like the animal in an exhausted receiver. There are some almost intangible essences constituting the boqiiet of a fine old wine, that may apparently be analyzed, but not synthetized. Possibly there is some subtle and evanescent element, more ethereal than the ethers themselves, that exhales and escapes in the process of analysis; for when the chemist of liquor manufacture comes to combine his known alcohol and water, his sugar and gum, his acids and salts, his oenanthic, acetic and other ethers, in due proportion — the resultant liquor is something flat, insipid and wholly distasteful to the refined palate. So with poetry; it is almost impossible to define it, for its very essence is liable to escape in the attempt to describe and circumscribe it. Rather than any substan- tive thing, it is a pervasive spirit that can be apprehended by our finer sense but scarce bottled up in any dictionary, or parcelled out in definite proportions by any exclusive critic. The poetry of synthesis — of rule and measure — somehow always fails, at the last, to include some of those vital elements which enter into its most ethereal composi- tion. The connoisseur in wines will readily detect the spuri- ous wine of combination, and pronounce it "dish-water." He will discriminate nicely between this brand and that, and all the different vintages of each; he will have his own especial choice in brand and vintage, as each connoisseur may; he will invariably reject wholly the TWO TRAVELERS OF SUCH A CAST. 63 spurious article — but he will be very chary of claiming that wine is the product of any especial vineyard or soil, or clime. And so, those of us who are neither critics nor con- noisseurs, may still plead to have our liberty of choice left to us — fallible and faulty though our taste may be. What, ho! ye sound authorities in literature, "because ye are virtuous shall we have no more cakes and ale" — the toothsome cakes of Romantic Fiction — and the inspiring ale of Objective Poetry! "Yes," retorts our prohibitive Psychologist, "provided you take off the froth and take out the alcohol from your ale ! " Vainly we protest that it is just the sparkle and the body to the ale that refreshes us. "No ! " cries the Tetotal Realist, "cakes are fantastic food; there's no substance or nourishment in them. Meat is the only proper food for man!" And both shout in chorus: "Man is the only fact or factor in creation worth considering — and with water to drink and meat to eat, man is all right — and with a looking-glass to hold up to man and reflect his very form and pressure, literature is all right ! " Now far be it from this writer to controvert such theory, much less propound any theory of his own, save this one, simple and hard I think to refute, that in Literature anything is good that is first-rate ! For the novel — the question is not, after all, to what school does it belong? Possibly the more schools it embraces the better, if all are properly composed and artistically disposed; if the picture have faithful realism in the near foreground, pleasing romance in the middle distance, and charming touches of idealism in the vanishing perspective — with the magic glow of genius irradiating the whole landscape ! Provided the work is noble in design and artistic in 64 TWO TRAVELERS OF SUCH A CAST. execution, the main question follows: "Is it helpful?" Will it broaden the range of our sympathies? Will it give us a truer outlook ! Will it teach us somewhat more of the nature of human relations and actions — the mysteries of human life ? But after all, for the mass of readers and with the mass of novels, their chief function must be to entertain, to divert, to soothe. How often the otherwise weary hours of pain are shortened, the pain itself somewhat assuaged, or at least for the time forgotten, by the perusal of a good work of fiction ! How the mind, that had been drawn to its utmost tension, has been healthily relaxed through the kindly influence of the fascinating page ! By the way, what a compliment we think to pay to some work of history, of travel, of science even, happily treated, when we say, "it is as fascinating as a romance ! " For all of us fast slipping over that imperceptible boundary between middle-life and old age, whether care- worn men of affairs, or weary and exhausted students — with nerves not quite so equable, nor spirits so buoyant as of old — when we come home at evening, fretted, troubled, well-nigh overburdened with the worrying realisms of life, and needing relaxation and enjoyment, we go into our library for a book that shall distract our minds and lead us into another and pleasanter realm of thought: we will take down — not "one of the grand old masters," not any of "the bards sublime" but — a good novel ! Then — ' ' The night shall he full of music, And the cares that infest the day- Shall fold up their tents like the Arabs, And silently steal away." THE REALIST IN ART. Were we to credit the current claims put forth, we might suppose the taste for music, and that for pictures to be well nigh universal. In Art, everybody professes to love the one and admire the other. Vet Shakespeare seems to have had some ideal monster in mental projec- tion, who, untouched "by concord of sweet sounds," was only "fit for treasons, stratagems and spoils," and occa- sionally, some extremely candid individual confesses that to him there are no "odds in pictures." It may be admitted, I think, that there are different degrees of liking for art, with only a limited few aspirants whose liking is sufficiently a matter of true taste and ardent feeling to be justly ranked as loving. The person who can contentedly pass through a gallery of masterpieces of art, giving just five minutes to the Sistine Madonna, three each t£> Correggio's Holy Night, Carlo Dolci's Saint Cecilia and Battoni's Magdalen, two to the Rembrandts, and an average of the same time to each of the twenty-one cabinet galleries; thus doing the whole first floor of the Dresden gallery in one hour; then hurry off to devote equal time and attention to the Grime Gewcelbe — this traveller can fitly be handed over to the cruel tender mercies of the "personally conducted," without any fear that his ardent longings for art may suffer any conflict of torn emotions, "the pangs of despised love," or "the sickness of hope deferred." 66 THE REALIST IN ART. The appreciation of such a man for art is of a very low grade. He views pictures chiefly from idle curiosity, or because he has heard it is considered the proper thing to do. With another class, the sentiment is far above this, and yet, it may be doubted whether their enjoyment of paintings is not the same as it so frequently proves in music, chiefly a matter of association. It is often the words of a song, the beautiful ideas they express or suggest, that appeal to us, rather than the music itself, though, through the union with such words, the music may come to be loved thereafter — calling up as it does by the subtle suggestion of association, the words that had moved us before; — the two having become intimately blended in our minds through that happy marriage of "perfect music wed to noble words." Many old ballads possess this union in such degree that it is difficult to analyse closely and say wherein the chiefest charm consists. Mark the great singers on their encores — how naturally they strike the ballad when they wish to please the cultured and the uncultivated ear alike! Is it the music of them — or "that touch of nature which makes the whole world kin" in the words — which gives their grand success. So in painting. How often it is the story told by the picture that really arrests and charms the average beholder, rather than the depth of tone and harmony of color in the picture itself! An old-time joker used to recoup himself whenever any of his funny stories "missed fire," by immediately certifying them to his obtuse audi- tory as absolute fact in every particular ! In like manner you can often awaken interest in the mind of a realist when the picture fails to enlist his attention on the score of Art. If it is, for instance, an ideal girl's face — one of THE HE A LIST IN ART. 6 7 Jacquet's, opulent in sensuous beauty, or Greuze's in "spirituelle" grace — tell him it is a portrait of Nilsson, or of a princess of the English royal family ! If this does not answer, the only resource is to enlarge upon the gilding of the frame. Engraving or etching may "tell the story" about as faithfully and successfully— and, in fact, these are enjoyed by many fully as well as the finest pieces of color. This especially applies also to a large class who have an almost purely intellectual appreciation of Art. For the foregoing reason, a landscape which is a faithful transcript of an actual scene will be far more attractive to many than any ideal one, however full that might be of the higher charms of imagination and of feeling. A "sketch from nature" almost invariably "draws" with this class of minds if, indeed, it be not too plainly '.'out of drawing." However indifferent they may have been to it as a work of art, they become inter- ested in it as an actual scene — particularly if it represents one they may have themselves beheld. These people are Realists. They enjoy photographs of people and places— especially of people and places that they have seen or read about — and cannot compre- hend why the photograph of a painting, skilfully colored up to imitate the original, is not as good as the original itself. By the constitution of their minds, there is no good reason, outside of its repute and religious association, why Murillo's "Immaculate Conception" — an ideal picture of the Virgin whom they have not seen — should interest them half so much as a good photograph of some loved relative or friend. English artists, as a school, are famed for their devo- tion to the above idea. Their pictures must all "tell a 68 THE REALIST IN ART. story;" that is, represent something that either is, or purports to be, real in its essence — happening or that might happen — something in either actual life, history or literature. The artists of this nation paint for a. practical people, and know what will sell in their market. We freely admit that their stories are usually pure, and often infused with a pleasant or touching sentiment. The Royal Academy catalogues show a large proportion of this kind of work, done very well, indeed. It is genre painting of a very refined character; comparing most favorably, in subject and sentiment, with that of the Dutch and Flemish schools of the seventeenth century, though far inferior in strength — as, indeed, it is in quality of drawing and brilliance of technia x ue — to that of the French realistic school of to-day. In moral tone the English artist of this type is immeasurably superior to his Gallic neighbor. Lacking, however, the finer impulse and sway of the imagination, the realistic school of all nations fails to attain and inhabit the higher realms of art. As a rule, we Americans, in common with the bulk of mankind, are realists and like realism in our pictures. If they fail to reproduce things just as they are in ordinary life, what are they good for? Pictures and statuary are representations — and if they do not represent things in their usual aspect and as they appear to our ordinary apprehension, what use have we for them? What's the use ? A poor dealer in merchandise in a certain Kansas town who had ventured to lay in for holiday trade, some store of bric-a-brac — what the Yankee travelled abroad called " articles of virtue and objects of bigotry" — was bored THE REALIST IN ART. 6 9 almost to verge of desperation by the invariable, persis- tent query propounded by every customer to whom he exhibited them: "What's the use of this?" "What's that for, anyway ? " He found that he could scarce hope to sell them unless he suggested practical uses for them; and so, rather than have all left on his hands, he was driven to inventing various applications for them, undreamed of by their designers ! He turned line art into a sell, •—And then he sold it very well." These people were Realists of the first water. Emerson spoke to their apprehension an unmeaning parable in his '• If eyes were made for seeing, Then beauty is its own excuse for being." Keats wrote for them in a tongue as unknown as Sanscrit or Choctaw when he penned, •• A thing of beauty is a joy forever. Its loveliness increases— it will never Pass into nothingness; but still will keep A bower quiet for us and a sleep Full of sweet dreams and health and quiet breathing." This quotation, by the way, is from a book in my library, long ago appropriately bound in sheep by some Eastern realist publisher, who gathered three poets into one volume and lettered it "COLERIDGE, SHELLEY, ETC." Just think of the author of Endymion, and the Eve of St. Agnes, being labeled as Etcetera ! I have alluded to the fact that a large class, embracing many cultured people, find fully as much appreciative enjoyment in engravings, etchings and sketches in black and white as they do in the finest examples of color. Without derogating in the least from the artistic merit of work within this range— a scope which embraces, indeed, 7o THE REALIST IN ART. some of the finest achievements in art- 1 — yet I would raise the query whether, in such cases, one element at least is not lacking in the mental constitution. In an aesthetic sense are they not to a greater or less degree color-blind? Whether this be so or no, it strikes me that, failing to appreciate the tones of color in a picture, they lose a great deal of that largess of sensuous joy which nature distributes often with such lavish hand. It is true, indeed, that the needle or the burin, "skilful and touched with passionate love of art," may intimate, to some extent, the gradations of those tones in their effects of light and shade; but surely those glowing or melting harmonies of color, which are the triumphs of a great painter, impart a beauty and a glory that no scheme of black and white combinations can ever successfully rival. Speculating on this matter, I have sometimes fancied that some men's minds are so constituted that they may be said to be "drawn in black and white." These are often great thinkers, great reasoners; cool, dispassionate, clear-sighted, illumined with the clear, white light of truth. They may become eminent jurists, illustrious scientists, wonderful logicians and metaphysicians, grand philosophers even; but hardly great orators, great novel- ists, great poets or great divines ! These should have the endowment of all the color that is in the universe. Like the first class, they may possess all that is best in Realism — but they should be Idealists beside. To return to our consideration of the realists, whose love for art we have dared to call in question; the writer, having ventured so far, is half inclined to go farther and commit the unpardonable sin of doubting whether, as a rule, they are really seized and possessed of any great admiration for nature herself ! THE REALIST IN ART. 71 Let us suggest that the love of landscape in nature and on canvas is apt to be reciprocal; that if we possess the former we shall naturally be drawn to the latter, when any- good examples are afforded us; while even from glowing effects in pictures we may be instructed to discern more in nature than we had dreamed of before. Browning has noted, in poetic phrase, that we see things when painted which we miss in reality, while Hamerton goes farther, and reminds us that we sometimes have livelier, warmer and kinder sympathies at the call of the imagina- tive artist than the real world usually awakens in us; the revelations of the sympathetic artist carrying us farther into the realm of the ideal than we could travel, unaided by his inspiration. We may first learn to love resplendent sunset effects from the painted ideal, but once having acquired their appreciation, we shall discover ten times as many in the evening sky as he who cares naught for pictures and to whom they are as to one who, "having eyes sees not." One summer evening, some years ago, a train load of excursionists — chiefly members of a Western Legislature, and their families — was approaching the city of Denver. When within some fifteen miles thereof, the engine collided with some cattle, and one poor cow became so badly tangled up with the wheels of the locomotive that the whole train was stopped. The delay was such that about all the passengers alighted. From this slope of the Plains, the great range of the Rockies was finely visible, and, at the moment, the view to the west chanced to be one of scenic effect rarely equalled in any land. The sun, curtained behind a bank of cloud lying just above the mountain line, sent forth shafts of light that, toned by the mists hanging between the ranges, suffused the peaks 72 THE HEAL18T IN ART. with the most delicate, the most ethereal and yet the most vivid roseate glow imaginable. Their forms shone forth sharply denned, covered with rich masses of trans- parent rose-color; while northward, Long's Peak mingled by imperceptible gradations with heavier cloud-banks behind, and the flanks of the whole range toned into darkest and intensest blue. Idealized and glorified thus by those two great painters, Sunlight and Air, the enchanted spectator could scarce realize that this wondrous ethereal vision was, indeed, that Titanic, primeval mass of giant mountains, the "Backbone of the Continent." With every deformity hidden, every harsh, rugged outline softened into flowing lines of grace, they might well have passed for that beautiful range of Carrara which the traveller sees rise before him in the plains of Tuscany — but with the white marble tinted as the rose — or for that vision of the Delectable Mountains which we beheld in our childhood through the imagination of grand old John Bunyan. Nature, fortunately, is not always realistic, but images herself to us oftentimes, robed in illusive diaphanous veils of atmosphere, or tinted with the thousand harmo- nies of color. — And all this shining glory of the western sky was beheld at the time by perhaps half a dozen of the train load! The eyes of the remainder might possibly have beheld something of it had they not been too busy regarding the mutilated dead cow, which had finally been dragged out upon the plain. In this contest, between the Real and the Ideal, the former commanded as usual, the sympathies of the great majority. FROM REALISM TO IDEALISM. However differing in our views as to its proper province to-day, we have little difficulty in agreeing that Art finds its origin in Realism. It is claimed by certain of the Evolution school that, in retracing the growth of the religious idea in man, they find its root in the grossest fetichism. In like manner, it may be admitted that art finds its beginning in the crudest form of realism. If the passion for pictorial representation be not inherent in the race, it certainly begins very early in the history of man. We can hardly trace him so far back but that we find some manifesta- tions of this faculty. As with the barbarous races of the present, so with prehistoric man; his traces and relics among the bone-caves show that, whether partly imagina- tive or wholly realistic, he essayed to carve on bones from which he may have stripped the raw flesh to appease his ravenous hunger, some semblance in outline of the savage beasts by which he was surrounded. If in no other way, he showed even then his superiority over the animals from which he had become differentiated, for man is the only one that ever makes pictures. In all the ages since, this faculty has been developing; crudest in the crudest and approximating the domain of art as he ascended in the scale of mental development. Whatever practical purposes it may have subserved in the outset (including the art of picture-writing, for 73 74 FROM REALISM TO IDEALISM. instance,) the period has often arrived in the progress of its development when, as so supremely in ancient Greece, its realistic phase became largely subsidiary; the actual took on the mystic tinge of the imaginative and the ideal. Striving to find in itself a medium of expression, art advanced upon its interpretation of what was finest and best in nature by seeking an ideal type that might symbolize, if not express, an imagined perfection, grander and more beautiful than mortal man himself could exhibit. Comparing the art relics of Greece with those of other ancient nations, we can realize how far the idealistic conception of the Hellenes and their pursuit of art for art's sake had projected them beyond the era of crude products of realism in art that marked the highest stage of Egypt and Assyria. The conceptions of these peoples were largely realistic; even their imagination could soar no higher than the embodiment, in part at least, of the coarsely material forms around them; so for statues of their gods they constructed abominations in ugly combi- nations of beast and bird — winged bulls — their highest idealization of the material forces in nature. To begin with analogies from kindred arts, we might set forth that there is far more in Oratory than the command of rhetoric, with all its manifold figures, its sounding periods, and tricks of emphasis and gesture. The soul of that true eloquence which moves and inspires men until they are swayed out of themselves, includes something beyond all these, which can rather be felt than adequately defined. There is something in Poetry beyond "the chime and flow of words which move in measured file and metrical array." Music is not solely "a succes- sion of rhythmic vibrations and their pleasing effect upon the sonorous pulses of the ear." And so in the Fine FROM REALISM TO IDEALISM. 75 Arts. The highest art in Painting, in Sculpture, and in Architecture, embraces something far beyond mere representation, even of what is fine in nature. And, indeed, it is well to remember that nature herself, as some writer has fairly discriminated, "is not all love- liness, all grandeur, all magnificence by any means, any more than she is all beneficence." We contrast her perfections with her imperfections. Only a tithe of the scenes she presents are worthy of reproduction. Many of her creations are crude and commonplace; some of her aspects are even repulsive, while others of her ruder features she herself, in happy moods, idealizes. Then comes, indeed, the proper moment for the artist to transfer them to canvas ! And there are yet others which, possessing some grand capabilities of interpreta- tion, need all the idealization which is in the soul of man to conceive, the product of rich suggestions garnered up it may be from Nature herself, in past ecstatic moments. So the great painter, in sketching the present landscape, transfers to its features something far finer than appears to common eyes, imparting a grace and beauty born of inspiration and of memory — thus adding to all that is worthiest in the actual scene the grand suggestion of all that might have been. In like manner, the great artist in his creation of ideal characters imparts to the lineaments of the living model his conception of what is most lovely or tender, pathetic or strong — the expression of all the emotions or passions that "stir this mortal frame," as in turn he may wish to exhibit them. However closely approximating the painter's needs, the model is, after all, but a lay-figure, which the Master arrays with the vestures of his own royal 'imagination. Pictures that represent only the 76 FROM REALISM TO IDEALISM. model fail entirely to excite our sympathy or admiration. They have no power to move us; "there is no soul in them," and "painted from model," is so palpable that it might as well be lettered across their face. The difference between painting of this class, and that wherein the true artist has succeeded in imprinting his highest ideals of men and women, "beaming with love, thrilling with tenderness, radiant with goodness, ardent with fidelity " — this difference is immense. Hamerton, in his "Imagination in Landscape Painting, " assigns a most important place in art to this faculty of the mind. Its exercise marks in great degree the vast superiority of Idealism over Realism. It is his theory, likewise, that in Painting as in Oratory, the chief element of the success of the master is his power to command our imaginative sympathy. This he claims as the real secret of influence, and he instances its power in painting, by the example of a picture by Normann, in the Salon of '85. It was of the Sognefiord in Norway — a salt-water loch, enclosed by precipitous mountains of bare granite, whose oppressive grandeur shuts out forever the distance and half the sky. In this inhospitable scene, entirely bare of trees or verdure, are a few wooden houses that suggest life, and the pathetic interest of the work lies in the sympathy we immediately feel for the inhabitants. How can human beings exist, says our imagination, in such a desolate solitude? The colony, however, is not entirely isolated — the artist has linked them to the world without by showing a little steamer making its way into the calm deep water, with a line of foam at its bows. The charm of the picture is its suggestiveness — like that of Boughton's "Return of the Mayflower," or his "Two FROM REALISM TO IDEALISM. 77 Farewells." Such pictures not only attract our attention, but hold it. We return to them again and again, drawn by their power of moving our sympathetic imagination. And yet some great reputations have been built up by a conscientious practice of Realism, and faithful repro- duction of models in conjunction with accessories and properties that smack of the theater rather than the domain of Art. That of Alma Tadema is, perhaps, a conspicuous example. His rehabilitations of customs and costumes of classic Greece and Rome, recognized as faithful in an historic and archaeologic sense, are, after all, dry and soullessly realistic in their representation; while the idyls of Sir Frederick Leighton, with ideal figures and scene whose exact type might not be found this side Arcady, are yet so instinct with true poetic feeling that they seem very near to the heart of that Nature which is of all times and seasons. Compare, too, the picturesque and statuesquely posed and strongly painted manikins of Gerome, Meissonier and all their coldly brilliant school, with the assured power and dignity of the figures in Couture's "Romans of the Decadence," and Carl Miiller's "Call of the Condemned;" with the whirlwind rush and strength of Detaille's and De Neuviile's battle-pieces, of Schreyer's Arabs, and Schelmonski's or Kowalski's Cossacks of the steppes ! Or better still, with the portrayal of honest, French-peasant life of Jules Breton or Francois Millet. All these are realistic in one sense, and on the better side of realism — their foundation in real life — but life instinct with the expression of feeling and emotion. Their personages are actual, living, breathing human beings — not actors simulating them beneath the curtain of a stage. In these — and especially with the works of the latter — 78 FROM REALISM TO IDEALISM. there is something more than Realism. The brush of a great artist, the magic wand of imagination and of genius, has touched and vivified the dull clod of humanity, and the soul of the man shines forth from amid the clay of its ordinary surroundings. The life of the toiling hind is faithfully portrayed. It is, indeed, the peasant, in his rude home or pursuing his usual avocations, but — taking him at his humble best, his moments of earnest endeavor, of aspiration and of adoration — they infuse the picture with that glow of true sentiment and feeling which can dignify and exalt the homeliest aspects of life. Yet it is only fair to admit that certain realists, the pioneers of the school in French art, did a great work, a generation or so ago, in correcting the popular taste and breaking down a weak, false and conventional classicism. Such artists, for instance, as the historical painter Horace Vernet — clever, dashing and sensational. These swept away the old traditions, and gave opportunity for the cultivation of the most perfect technique that the world has ever seen. Considered solely as an art, without estimating its worth in the higher realms of Fine Art, painting, probably, was never brought to a greater perfec- tion than it attains in France to-day. Conspicuous amid this school for h'i strength, the very prince and apostle of realism in later days, the strongest and most satisfactory of all, we may cite Courbet, the Communist — he who, responsible for the overthrow of the Column Vendome, afterward paid some penalty for his vandalism. Master of the secrets of color — bold and vigorous both in interpretation and treat- ment — he commanded, says Jarves, "an introspective view into the primary elements of nature and of man, analogous to that exhibited in literature by Browning and FROM REALISM TO IDEALISM. jg Walt Whitman." "Paint nothing that you have not seen ! Show me an angel and I will paint you an angel !" — was the motto and expression of Courbet. Wholly antagonistic in style was Corot — chief disciple and exponent of a more advanced dispensation. His is the great name in modern landscape art of that wonder- ful series which began half a century ago with Theodore Rousseau (inspired in the outset by the ''naturalistic" Constable), and enumerates among its list of names painters of varying styles of treatment, though impelled by much the same principles in art, Lambinet, Daubigny, Diaz and Dupre. These are men of the same school, not as imitating one another, for each preserves his own individuality, but agreeing "in looking at nature not only for what she seems to the visual eye, but still more for what she suggests to the soul." None of these noted artists were, after all, great landscapists in the sense of wide scope of subject and treatment, as Turner at least aspired to be. On the contrary, they are restricted to special aspects of nature and phases of scenery; so that only the wonderful mastery they exhibit and the charm with which they invest their special interpretations redeem them from the charge of monotony. Certainly were they working their vein in the realistic manner, we should tire of them in the extreme; but these wrought with thought, with deep sentiment and with loving feeling, and gave us the very poetry of landscape. Rousseau revived the technical excellence of Ruysdael and of Cuyp, with a more natural and correct rendition of the greens in nature. Lambinet's pastorals, with somewhat less of poetic feeling, exhibit the same mastery of the resources of color, blended in most harmonious 80 FROM REALISM TO IDEALISM. gradations, and are illuminated with sunlight, "painted as faithfully as pigments can represent it." The poetry of these two, exuberant with the joy of nature, is that of Robert Burns — of the early Tennyson (especially of Tennyson's "Brook") — and of the summer vision of Lowell's "Sir Launfal." With Diaz and Corot, as with our American Wyant, it is the poetry of Bryant, and of Wordsworth; their sentiment being largely infused with a tender pathos, not to say a subdued melancholy, which reminds one of the author of "Thanatopsis, " or of the "Intimations of Immortality." These together touch the extremes of the gamut of color: Corot with the light-greens of spring, and the silvery- grays of early dawn or twilight; Rousseau and Lambinet including all the affluent hues of summer; Diaz with the dark-greens and russet-browns of autumn. Corot, it is admitted, is by far the greatest artist. The charm of his works consists not in their being mere transcripts of actual scenes — there is nothing of the photography of art in them. Either the artist penetrates deeper than many into the inner sense of Nature, or he imparts, like our own Francis Murphy, some quality of his own poetic imagination to the picture, which thereby gains the power to suggest and inspire moods of mind. Sweet mystery, dreamy reflection, tranquil enjoyment — ■ these are states of mind induced by contemplation of the bewitching landscapes of Corot. What is the true function of painting, what the province of the painter — and not of him alone, but of all artists and all art? Let us attempt to summarize, even though we should repeat. In so doing we shall by no means imagine that we are expressing any new thought, or one FROM REALISM TO IDEALISM. 8 1 that has not been said in clearer and better phrase oft- times before; yet in this intensely practical and realistic age, the reminder can scarce come too often. Once more let us put the old wine into new bottles! It is then the province of art, not so much to represent nature as to interpret her. Nature, that is, in her highest; Nature at her best ! The artist should have all the knowledge of technique which goes with the strongest Realism. He shall abide in that land for a season, but he may not inhabit it. He shall work through Realism into Idealism. He shall attain first to the body, and then to the soul that informs it. The Poet first drinks at the fountain of preceding poets; he is an imitator before he is original. "He lisps in numbers ere the numbers come." The Sculptor may well study first, and long, anatomy and models of classic beauty, till at last the flowing outlines of grace shall naturally and fitly drape the form whose face shall image the grand conceptions of beauty and purity that his artist soul shall shadow forth. The Painter should, indeed, study nature. To him, all Nature and all Art should render up their secrets of light and shade, of form and coloring. Nature in sunshine and in storm: the broad prairie, the mountain cliff, the tumbling waterfall, the surge of ocean, the desert sand; the blue skies of Capri, the brassy glow of Egypt, the opal tints of Labrador; — all these should be known to the great painter. What then? Shall he stop at the pictured representation of these things on canvas ? If so, what has he achieved? Simply a magnificent colored photo- graph ! No ! He must, first of all, perceive what is picturesque in nature, what is worthy of translation, and then give 7 82 FROM REALISM TO IDEALISM. us all this and far more than the form and tint of moun- tain, sea and sky. He must shed upon the canvas that glory without which, rock nor tree, nor curled wave, nor tinted cloud has valid excuse for being; that glory which, shining in the soul of the artist, an inner sense of something finer than all these, in a mystic world within or beyond, shall reflect upon the canvas before us, suggesting a yet greater glory: — " The light that never was on sea or land, The * consecration and the poet's dream." To enter into the finer sense of things around us; to follow out the suggestions of beauty and glory that ordi- narily lie hidden in grass or flower, in tinkle of waterfall or tone of speech, in glow of sunset or tender irradiation of the face we love; all this appeals to a sense that, for want of better naming, let us term the poetry of life ! We choose to take it for granted that all the Finer Arts are correlated, and all pervaded in their higher forms with a spirit and essence, to grasp at whose expression we must reach far beyond all mere represen- tation of things we see around us, however beautiful they may be. This spirit may find some manifestation alike through kindling eye, through eloquent or rhythmic speech, through music, through all the elevated forms of artistic expression: " The kindled marble's bust may wear More Poetry upon its speaking brow, Than aught less than th' Homeric page may bear. One noble stroke with a whole life may glow, Or deify the canvas till it shine "With beauty so surpassing all below, That they who kneel to idols so divine Break no commandment, for high Heaven is there, Transfused— transfigurated." THE OLD KNICK. •• Stranger on the right Looking very sunny— Obviously reading Something rather funny. Now the smiles are thicker — Wonder what they mean ! Faith, he's got the Knicker — bocker Magazine ! " So sang, once upon a time, John G. Saxe, the funny versifier, prince of doggerelists and poet-by-brevet ! In that primitive period, "Riding on a Rail "-road, was actually something so novel as to be commemorated — and the early 'age of the railway was also the era of the Knickerbocker Magazine. With the multiplicity of peri- odicals now issued, there is such an embarrassment of riches, that one has only to choose — if he can — between them, and may only regret that he shall miss unavoidably many bright, enjoyable things, from sheer inability to read — and pay for — so many monthly magazines. The generation of fifty years ago was not troubled in this way. For them, and for at least twenty years of their lives, the old "Knickerbocker" was the valued and only worthy representative of American Literature. The writer is happily reminded of this ancient magazine, now unknown probably even by name to the present generation of readers, by the presence in his library of two stray volumes of its series — and these in turn remind him of a few early numbers that he discovered in his 83 8 4 THE OLD KN1CK. father's book-case, during his early boyhood, and of the delight with which he perused their contents. We are not unmindful that there flourished, earlier or later during this period, various and sundry other month- lies; notably those located in Philadelphia, including Godey's Ladies' Book, Peterson's and Graham's Maga- zines. But these occupied a minor field, and however ambitious, could hardly claim to represent American literature. Godey's and Peterson's were devoted to the ladies — those of polite society — and were especially affected by young girls just graduated from the "female seminary " of that period, long anterior to the day of Vassar or the co-educational university. Each number of these periodicals started out with a highly-colored, lithographed "fashion-plate" — made up of wonderful, wasp-waisted, artificial divinities — and, next to this, as frontispiece, a "steel-plate" of almost equally impossible natural inanities, representing some child of earth, of the fairer sex, so highly idealized and etherealized as to present the strongest possible contrast to her sisters of the fashion-plate. The plane of every-day life, and the pencil of passably good drawing, were rarely attained in any of these artistic productions. Their letter-press was composed of sentimental verse, or stories by young writers, of such themes, for instance, as how the country mouse — an exemplary and sensible girl — went one winter to return a visit of the city mouse— her fashionable cousin — and got badly snubbed therein, but succeeded, never- theless, in carrying off the spoil of the desirable and sensible city millionaire, who could appreciate goodness when he saw it ! But if this style of fiction was unexciting it was, at all events, unobjectionable. The Ouidas and Saltuses did THE OLD KNICK. 85 not get into the magazines of those days. If insipidity prevailed, happily impurity was lacking. Godey was made up of pretty pictures, poetry and patterns, together with the "prunes and prisms" of prose, and Peterson's was like unto it, at five cents less per number. Graham's, as a "gentleman's magazine," professed a little more virility in its literature, and gave a trifle more originality. So for a score of years, Knickerbocker was practi- cally without a rival in its own field, that of literature which really possessed a literary quality. Starting in 1833 with Charles Fenno Hoffman, it came the next year into the editorship and part ownership of Louis Gaylord Clark, under which it continued throughout its history, and almost to its final close. In 1849, Harper's Magazine was started, but for several of its earlier years, that scarce came into competition with the Knickerbocker as a purveyor of American literature for, in the outset, the contents of Harper were largely "pirated" from the English periodicals. As some one smartly said at the time, its bill of fare showed that it "breakfasted on Thackeray, dined on Dickens and supped on Punch." With the advent of "Putnam's" in 1853 came an Amer- ican Magazine, of high class — one that is hardly surpassed by the best of those published to-day — and comprising, in one periodical, almost all the choice features now included among the whole list of the present. In the meantime, the good old Knickerbocker, for all those years, had at its command for contributors about all who gave dignity and honor to American literature; beginning with Hoffman, Cooper, Paulding, Irving, Halleck, Bryant, Miss Sedgwick and Miss Leslie, — of the old school — and including many of those of who have since come to the front — Longfellow, Holmes, 86 THE OLD KNICK. Hawthorn, Whittier, Aldrich — as well as still others, who, though "promising" in their day, are now forgotten wholly, or survive only in name, to prove how uncertain and brittle may be a literary reputation. As last year's leaves in the new spring-time, "the woods are full of them;" but alas, they lie dead upon the ground instead of fluttering green upon the boughs ! The contents of many volumes now classic in our literature first saw the light in Knickerbocker. Between its covers first appeared Irving's "Crayon Sketches," Longfellow's "Psalm of Life" and "The Skeleton in Armor," Ware's "Zenobia," and the "Tanglewood Tales" of Hawthorn. Closely identified with the old Magazine is the memory of Willis Gaylord Clark, twin-brother of its editor. Willis was himself editor of the Philadelphia Gazette, but con- tributed frequently to Knickerbocker, notably a series of sketches entitled "Ollapodiana," which, in apparently desultory manner, happily mingled sparkling wit or genial humor with sentiment and pathos, and an occasional gem of poetry. These sketches added much to the early popularity of the Magazine — but their gifted author died young. With all its talented contributors, however, its varied store of good reading in prose and verse, its success depended, after all, far more upon its editor's own efforts than is usually the case with a magazine. The real Knickerbocker was neither Washington Irving or his fellow contributors, nor any ideal old Dutchman in "knickerbockers," planted in an old, high-backed, carved ' chair on the title-page, but an actual, indefatigable, irrepressible Louis Gaylord Clark ! Every month, his potent personality spake out cheerily and unmistakably THE OLD KNICK. 87 in the last twenty or thirty pages, from the "Editor's Table," and in the "Gossip with readers and corres- pondents." His voice rang out clear with hearty, genial good-fellowship, often effused with rollicking, boisterous mirth, and then again, warmed into an eloquent or poetic fervor — or anon lapsed into tender cadences of pathos. What did these pages contain, or rather what did they not contain? They were a literary melange of the first order; an Ollapodrida, a Salmagundi, and a Pot-Pourri of wit and of wisdom, of frolic and of fun ! The touch was, perhaps, less delicate, the wit not so refined as that of his brother Willis, but it flowed forth an exhaustless stream of good things, from month to month, and from year to year. The lines on which the old Knickerbocker Magazine was laid down, were much the same as many a goodly magazine craft has been built upon since. Their framers have somewhat closely followed the Clark model, or, where they vary from it, the divergence is more apparent than real. For instance, in Harper's Monthly the material of the old Knickerbocker "Editor's Table" has been taken apart, and reconstructed into an "Editor's Easy Chair," in which genial Curtis sits; an "Editor's Study," in which Howells handles lovingly every favorite volume; and an "Editor's Drawer," into which Charles Dudley Warner "puts in a thumb and pulls out a plum" or a few nectarines in season. The honest old Dutch table of the Knickerbocker had plenty of stuff in it to construct all this furniture out of — albeit the lumber was in a less finished and highly polished state than these moderns fashion it. One thing is true, however, of Louis Gaylord Clark; he was a "square man" — as square as his Editor's Table — and yet he could well "a round unvarnished tale deliver." 88 THE OLD KNICK. All good things come to an end however. After a continuous service of a quarter of a century, the veteran retired from the editorship. Already many of the bright- est contributors to the magazine had left it, captured by and into the columns of some of its more stirring and aggressive rivals, of whom there were now several Rich- monds in the field; including the popular "Harper," the staunch " Putnam," and the brilliant young "Atlantic." The strife and turmoil of the Civil War had come, and with it a new class and generation of readers. A new king had arisen who knew not Joseph. It were better for the old Knickerbocker, to whom all this stir and strife was uncongenial, to step down and out, rather than to have it said of him ungraciously and ungratefully, — " Superfluous lags the veteran on the stage." And still he lingered ! One who has been a public's favorite, so hates to have the curtain rung down and the lights put out on him, for aye and all ! At last however, in his sixty-third volume, Old Knick was finally merged into another magazine, under the title of the "American Monthly Knickerbocker" — which, however, soon passed out of existence. It was, in a literary point of view, high time for the demise; '• For when his step grew feeble and his eye, Dim with the mists of age, it was his time to die." Still — in grateful memory of many a pleasant hour he gave in days lang syne — the writer is glad to say a good word even yet for the Old Knick. PUTNAM'S MONTHLY. Lovers of good literature of some thirty-five years ago that survive to the present, will recall with genuine pleasure the memory of the old Putnam's Magazine. In the above statement, one makes no account of the lapse of time nor of changing tastes; for surely, once to love good reading is never to lose its appreciation. In this case, so personal was the affection of its readers, that not only will the richly varied pages of the old magazine be fondly remembered, but also, in close association, the once familiar pea-green cover and the stalk of corn on either hand that framed the title thereon. That title-page cover came to be as well known as had long been .the old Dutchman with his pipe and chair to the lovers of the "Knickerbocker." It is the good fortune of the writer to possess a set of this periodical — both of the original series and of the "revived Putnam" — and these volumes now add the property of rarity to that of literary value, since outside of a few libraries they are scarce to be discovered. This magazine was founded in January, 1853, by George P. Putnam & Co., a firm of book publishers noted as well for the uniform merit and high literary character of their publications as for their liberal treat- ment of authors — who, in turn, held the firm in grateful esteem, instead of distrusting them, in common with the whole race of publishers, as their "natural-born enemies." The story of the origin of the Monthly was pleasantly 89 9° PUTNAM'S MONTHLY. told in some gossipy letters long years afterwards, by two of its editors, Charles F. Briggs and George William Curtis, on occassion of the revival of the Magazine in 1868. The plans, it seems, were brought to light at a dinner-party given by the publishers, at which were present those immediately concerned and a few literary friends and to-be contributors. With Briggs and Curtis was associated also as an editor, Parke Godwin, the brilliant politcal writer and son-in-law of William Cullen Bryant. Into the Magazine went not only the high hopes and ardent endeavors of the rising author of the popular "Nile Notes," but also all the bank notes of which he had become possessed thereby — and possibly the addition of a few of his own "notes of hand" as well, for his share of capital toward a part ownership — and, a few years afterward, when the firm went by the board, in the crash of '57, he had the misfortune to find his little all swept into the vortex of the liabilities of the concern. But it was a brilliant junto of young writers that took upon themselves the burden of launching the new literary craft, assisted, indeed, by many of the ablest authors of the period, and attracting soon to their pages many yet unknown, but fresh and vigorous contributors. The general scope and plan of the periodical need hardly be outlined here, as it was essentially that of the "Atlantic" later on, of which, indeed, it was a brilliant precursor. Its reviews of current literature, both European and American, and of the progress of Music and of the Fine Arts — of which latter, indeed, there was then but little to chronicle — were most creditably handled by the editors, who also contributed most effectively to the body of the Magazine. Notable among these early articles was a P UT NAM'S MONTH L Y. y T series of papers which discussed from a high plane, the politics of the country and the policies of administrations, from the pen of Parke Godwin. Able, vigorous and fearless, these could scarce fail to make a deep impres- sion upon the public mind — and what was still more needed then, the public conscience — especially as they were soon given a more permanent form by collection into a published volume. One of these broadly compre- hensive yet trenchant articles, published in the October number of 1855, on "The Kansas Question," was particularly welcome to the young men from the North, settled here and then contending at great odds with the Slave Power. Denounced by the Democracy as outlaws, harassed by Territorial governors, and proscribed by presidents, in the height of their discouragements they were grateful to know literature for their friend and the power of "Putnam's" on their side. Another of the editors — that distinguished Mugwump, as well as genial "Easy Chair" in Harper's of to-day — then demonstrated his talented versatility by a dashing charge into the ranks of the plutocratic fashionable society of that era. His series of " Potiphar Papers," evinced him a humorist and satirist of high order— though showing somewhat the influence of Thackeray — and added early popularity to the Monthly. These, too, were soon reprinted in book form, followed, not long after, by another series of contrasting quiet and home-like sketches entitled « Prue and I." And then, too, the Sparrowgrass papers of Frederick S. Cozzens ! What lover of genial wit and rollicking humor in that day is going to forget the man who wrote, "It is a good thing to live in the country," and of the 9 2 PUTNAM'S MONTHLY. ludicrous haps and mishaps of that life ! There has been a great development of " funny" Americans since then, whose wit is more exaggerated and broader, if not deeper — "the woods," and the syndicate "plated" newspapers are well nigh "full of them" — but in the ranks of genuine American humorists, and within the category of fun that, if not "fast and furious," is at least jocund and genial, we would still insist on reserving a good place for "Our American Cozzens." There were not wanting either, genuine "sensations" to be exploited in the Magazine; one of the earliest of which was that of the problem of the lost (and found) Dauphin of France, suggested in that taking title of the first article of its series, "Have we a Bourbon among us?" It was a matter of genuine historic interest, and its discussion helped to swell the circulation of the Magazine. Here too was broached, for the first time publicly in modern days, another controversy which, unlike, perhaps, that of the case of the Rev. Eleazar Williams, has never yet been finally set at rest, but like the restless ghost of Banquo, refuses to "down" for good at any authoritative bidding — the Bacon-Shakespeare controversy, started by Delia Bacon herself. Here is the article — "William Shakespeare and his Plays, an inquiry concerning them" — the first page of January, 1856; published as a first instalment, with a note from the editors, commending it as "a bold, original, most ingenious and interesting speculation as to the real authorship of the Plays" — and as "the result of a long and conscientious investigation on the part of the learned and eloquent scholar, their author" — yet disclaim- ing, of course, any responsibility for such literary heresy. P UTNA M'8 MONTH L Y. 93 It was a stone thrown into still water whose resulting circles have kept on spreading and widening; but this writer, having just re-read the article, would aver that the literary vigor, which went with the original cast, has never since been equaled by any latter-day Ignatius " Baconian. " Beside the range of scholarship evidenced, there was an elevation of thought and feeling, a quality of literary style, and a power of imagination that have usually been conspicuous by their absence, in the later disquisitions on the subject. On the other hand, one of the greatest of modern Shakesperians, Richard Grant White, first came into the arena of Shakesperian criticism, about the same period, in this magazine; of which papers therein, a book was made, entitled " Shakespeare's Scholar." Of all the commentators, Grant White stands as among the clearest, the most vigorous and the most logical — except, indeed, when occasionally lapsing into rhapsody, beguiled by that transcendental theory of the "unconscious posses- sion" of "supreme, all-embracing," superhuman genius. We might go on almost indefinitely, and cite many more notable books, made up in whole or in part from the pages of Old Putnam; wonderful papers by Lowell, Thoreau, Herman Melville, Tuckerman, Quincy, Clough ! The stories were especially good — only the very best of those printed now-a-days comparing, indeed, with "Twice Married," "Israel Potter," "Miss Chester," ' ' Stage Coach Stories, " " Wensley, " and dozens of others that might be named. "'Of making many books" there was "no end," out of the magnificent literary material of the old magazine. It was the rule of Putnam of the Old Series to give all its articles anonymously; a practice continued, in the 94 P UTNAM'S MONTHL T. outset, by the "Atlantic," but since abandoned by about all American periodicals. This had its advantages in that it gave the fairest possible show to new contributors, the merit of their articles not being overborne by their lack of "the magic of a name." On the other hand, the famous writers were deprived to a large extent of the commercial value of theirs — the prestige that goes as an adjunct to recognized, demon- strated ability. It might seem that the reader too was deprived of some needed criterion, being thus left to his own judgment of what was best worth reading, unbiassed by any "sign-manual" of recognized authorship, and deprived of the satisfaction of his curiosity; but this was usually only for a time for — some way or other — such literary secrets were pretty sure to leak out, sooner or later, and in the meanwhile, perhaps, the speculations and "guesses" of the newspapers as to the authorship of a popular article, served to advertise the magazine more than the publication of the longest list of "noted" contributors. In the first number appeared Longfellow's stirring lyric, "The Warden of the Cinque Ports," and while one knowing newspaper, assuming it as his, asserted that it showed signs of failing power, another found it to be undoubtedly but a weak imitation, from an inferior pen ! So much for the infallible critics ! In a hurried glance over the volumes, one recognizes among the poems thus published anonymously — besides the lines on the death of the Duke of Wellington — "The Two Angels," "My Lost Youth," "Oliver Basselin," ' ' Prometheus, " and ' ' Epimetheus, " by Longfellow; ' ' The Fount of Youth," "The Wind Harp," "Auf Wieder- sehen," and others by Lowell; "The Conqueror's Grave," PUTNAM'S MONTHLY. 95 of Bryant; "The Ranger, "of Whittier, and "My Mission" and "Young Love," by Bayard Taylor. In 1857, the magazine, which had for some time previous fallen into the hands of Dix & Edwards, was finally sold and merged into Emerson's Magazine, a sickly periodical, with no part in the nervous vigor of intellectual life that belonged to Putnam, and then soon passed out of existence. Eleven years after, when George P. Putnam & Sons had reestablished themselves in the book-publishing business, it was thought safe to attempt the revival of the old "Putnam's" — once more under the editorship of Charles F. Briggs — and a determined effort was made to warm up the embers of interest that attached to the memory of the " Old Mag." The surviving contributors, who had once been so fondly attached, were appealed to; all of whom expressed the heartiest interest, while many gave substantial encouragement of renewed literary con- tributions — as also did a corps of new writers who gradually gathered around it. Still, somehow, the old glories scarce came back. The young "Atlantic" now occupied very much the same field and cultivated it vigorously, and perhaps the business management was not such as to ensure financial success. At all events, after a respectable but not brilliant career of three years, the magazine was again sold out — this time to the Scribners — and on its ruins arose the successful "Scribner's Magazine," afterward renamed the "Century." The old "Putnam's" has gone for good, but its old- time readers will still remember it gratefully. At a time when the Harpers and other publishers were fast bound by the chains of commercial self-interest to "Old Hunker" 9 6 PUTNAM'S MONTHLY. subserviency to the South and to slavery, Putnam's gave itself freely to the cause of free soil and free thought. Amid the arid desert of an uninspired, commonplace literature, parched by the dreary drought of dough-faceism and famished through a dearth of faith, it was a fountain of sweet waters welling up refreshingly; it was the green palm waving in an oasis and casting a cooling shade, grateful as "the shadow of a great rock in a weary land." To one fresh from perusal of the current number — August, 1 890- -of the Atlantic, it might hardly seem that the transition from the magazine of one-third of a century ago were, after all, a violent one. Here is a poem by Whittier — "Haverhill" — that, at eighty-three years, betrays no loss; and here too, the "Autocrat," with whom we breakfasted in the first number of the Atlantic, still entertains us as brightly and genially as ever, "Over his Teacups!" Though every one enumerates "The Autocrat of the Breakfast Table," among his list of "One Hundred Favorite Books," yet even its covers scarce held anything racier than this poem of "The Broomstick Train." Remembering the mellow wine, so clear and fine, poured out as a libation at once to the youth which passes and the youth that endures, by Longfellow in his "Morituri Salutamis;" recalling Bryant's "Flood of Years," and all the later verse of Lowell, Whittier and Holmes, produced after fifty — yea, sixty years — it were scarce too much to affirm of these venerated authors "the best wine is the last." THE GOLDEN AGE. "Tis told in Hesiod's ancient rhyme And still we love the mythic story, How earth had once a primal time, Its sun, a more transcendent glory. The whole world at one altar knelt, And man to man as brother, In tranquil peace and concord dwelt As children of one mother. That Golden Age on earth once shared, When angels walked with men, Poet and seer have long declared Some day, shall come again. But waiting not, let each and all Restore some truth to fable olden, Some bliss of Eden ere the Fall, — Bring back, with love, the Age that's Golden! 97 1855 TO 1854, GREETING! (At a Reunion of Kansas Pioneers.) As one who, later born, yet envies not The earliest in primogeniture, But holds in honor and affection sure That elder brother, whose the happy lot To heir the crown for which they jointly fought,. Then freely shared with all beneath the sun The heritage of Freedom kept and won; — So we but honor, what yourselves have wrought. First, highest place, we gladly you assign Who earliest strove, 'mid darkest storm and stress: 'Tis haply yours to know, ere life decline, The chance Fate gave into your hands to bless. Founders and fathers of a mighty State, We hail you as of all most fortunate ! 98 THE LOUNGER AT HOME AND ABOUT. Our minds travel when our bodies are forced to stay at home. — Emerson. TO THE POET OF THE PARK. Thou, whom the early hasteners to toil Discern 'mid shadowed copses, as they pass, Noting each glint of pearl on dewy grass, Inhaling all the fragrance of the soil — Welcoming the echo of wood-robin's note, (Sweetest of all that burst from feathered throat); Who markest with delight each opening bud, And each new leaf that trembles in the wood — No shy thing animate but trusts thy mood, And loves thee, as thou lovest bird and flower: — Here may we find thy haunt at later hour Of drowsy noon, stretched out by foot of tree, Its shadowing leaves thy curtain-canopy; Hearing of thousand insect wings the drone and whir, The wren's sharp twitter and the hum of bee: Thou chartered favorite ! 'tis given thee To feel each tingling pulse of Nature stir, To be in touch and unison with her ! ^ ~i' ^i >jc ^ :fc ^ :|; But as the sun rides down to glowing west, And length'ning shadows stretch athwart the glade — Leave thou to multitude thy Park, displayed In garish light, and evening dress arrayed; — Seek thou that scene which Nature claims her best, And climb with me the slope of Oread's crest ! 101 I0 2 TO THE POET OF THE PARK. Of tree and shrub a varied range explore ! — Thy birds thou shalt not miss, but gain the more: And more of all ! — Thine eye, in pensive mood. May range o'er stream and valley, plain and wood, Viewed thus from far, a peopled solitude — Where storm-clouds darken — or where sunshine smiles Above a circling arc of four-score miles ! In quiet noon, in far-off leagues of skies, Becalmed at sea, float snowy argosies; — At silent eve, from distance infinite Of dim horizon trembling into sight, Rolls toward this cliff of shore — toward you and me, A misty blue of darkling, heaving sea ! ******** Thou, who canst love a Nature vast and grand, Come where the heavens and earth alike expand, Come and behold this ocean of the land ! TRAVELS AT HOME. I. The writer, who, in his own time and earlier days, disported somewhat as a rambler, has now settled down, in his green old age, into a confirmed, professional Lounger, vibrating between the chimney corner in winter and the street corner in summer time — indulging in an occasional stroll, it may be, as far as Bismarck Grove, or even the borders of the Wakarusa, in the pleasant spring or mellow autumn days. It occurs to him that there may be those who, like himself, or for other reasons than age or indolence restricted in their wanderings, but unrestrained as to their loiterings and ponderings, might yet be able, with a trifle of assistance or direction, to glean a goodly harvest of visual enjoyment within their circumscribed area of observation — especially when that range is so prolific in beautiful scenic effects as is the vicinity of our town of Lawrence. Should this last statement be received by any with incredulity, and a smile at the local egotism of the Lounger, let it be his pleasing task to attempt the conversion of such to a share of his belief in its truth. There are always two classes of people in this world — those who believe that the rainbow touches the earth very far away from the beholder, and those who never fail to see it arching and glowing almost immediately over their own heads. Of the two, the latter class is probably the happier. 103 IQ 4 TRAVELS AT HOME. Again, the division may be made on other lines, which are happily far from inclusive. First, those who travel far and see little. Second, those who see and learn a great deal without stirring any distance from home. Of course, there are home-keeping folks in plenty, who see little and learn less ("home-keeping folks have ever homely wits," says the adage of such), while fortunately, on the other hand, we have some travelers whose many angles of incidents are fully equaled by their angles of reflection; which, indeed, should always be as true in foreign travel as in Physics. But were we confined to the first two classes alone, the Lounger would hardly chose him who had "traveled the wide world all over," and yet had brought back little of value save a few diamonds and dress-suits, that he had saved duty on. Of such, the trunks are generally better filled than their heads, and they fairly merit the cynic observation once falsely fathered on Humboldt, and as falsely applied to a noted American — that he "had traveled farthest and seen the least of any man he had ever met." While the Lounger might desire for himself the wider range of observation, he grants the meed of his humble admiration to those who, tethered by a short rope, have closely and exhaustively cropped the field of knowledge within their reach; or to put it in more aesthetic phrase, who, from closest sympathy with nature, have taken into their hearts and minds every charm and secret which she discloses only to her chosen votaries. To such, an island may be almost as comprehensive as a universe ! Gilbert White, of Selborne, found the little parish he inhabited a microcosm of England and the world — and in making its natural history noted, created a classic of TRAVELS AT HOME. I05 English literature. Thoreau could find almost everything in flora and fauna around the shores of Walden Pond, which itself, like Wordsworth's Rydal Mere, is only a mill-dam in extent. A Pennsylvanian — Dr. William Darlington — publishing a local botany of his native county, made his "Flora Cestrica " so complete and comprehensive that it became a standard, securing its author the association of leading naturalists the world over; his own name given to a family of plants in remote California, and his bust placed near that of Sir Joseph Hooker in the Royal Gardens of Kew. These are but a few instances of the many that might be cited as to the capacity of the born naturalist to garner rich harvests from limited fields, and the rule holds good, to a great extent, with respect to the beauties and scenic effects of nature, as well. One need not traverse sea and land to find them; to him who is by true sympathy instructed in their mysteries, they will be "here and there and everywhere" around him. He can behold as richly tinted skies in Kansas as in Italy; more glowing reflections in the despised Kaw than the Arno at Pisa or Florence; as broad and beautiful a landscape spread out from the summit of Mt. Oread as from the heights of far famed Fiesole, albeit not so classic. All very well, says the reader, but, dropping sentiment and coming down to business, whereabouts do you propose to begin your "travels at home?" Gentle reader — gentle or simple, whoever you be — the Lounger does not propose to start you off at all at the end of this long exordium ! No ! take breath for a week first, and in the meantime, any day in the week, go and stand at the intersection of Massachusetts and Winthrop streets — 106 TRAVELS AT HOME. in the center thereof — and look east, west, north and south ! And if right there, where hundreds pass and repass each other daily, you can discern naught of beauty at the end of any of the green vistas, the Lounger has grave doubt whether he ever wishes to take you along with him at all. II. The candid reader (and all my readers are of the candid kind, for none others will care to scan these pap- ers) will frankly admit that the Lounger did not seize him perforce and rush him off hurriedly upon these Travels at Home. Every journey presupposes a certain amount of preparation given beforehand, and certain requisites of travel laid in. Now, for our shorter ramblings, about the only requirement the Lounger would insist upon is a receptive state of mind. This is absolutely essential to the proper appreciation and enjoyment of the scenery, and will be found just the happy mean — as far removed from any gushing tendency on the one hand, as from a nil admirari spirit on the other. It is the tendency of young and unsophisticated travelers of ardent and impulsive nature, to exaggerate and "gush." It is the fault of experienced ones to be hypercritical — persistently unwilling to discover anything to admire. Even when you direct their attention to some lovely scene, they can only impair its charms by belittling comparison with their reminiscences. Which prefer you, gentle reader, the Caviler or the Gusher? As for the Lounger, he commits himself to neither company, but like the colored gentleman to whom was presented the alternative of two terrible roads of theologic dilemma — "dis darkey takes to de woods." vjv ^» ?p 7fc yfc 7J^ 7Jt yp TRAVELS AT HOME. 107 More than a week ago the Lounger left his reader "planted" at the corner of Massachusetts and Winthrop streets. Apologizing for the incivility, if he will now climb with us the stairways of the National Bank build- ing, he will be amply rewarded for the fatigue by the- fine views he will obtain from its upper windows, embracing nearly all the city and much of the beautiful country surrounding. From the north windows, the view embraces the dam/ the mills and bridges, the river and its valley; with North Lawrence and Bismarck, and the beautiful rolling bluffs beyond, which, in the days when the old tribe inhabited them, the early settlers were wont to call the Delaware Hills. These finely rounded bluffs, ranging in from the west- ward almost parallel with the river's course, and then trending off to the northeast toward Leavenworth in smooth and graceful promontories, are always a beautiful element in the landscape around Lawrence, whether clothed in the white snows of winter, or, as now, in emerald verdure of spring. Especially are they in their scenic glory on those days of fitful sky, when the fickle sun, shining between shifting clouds, flecks them with alternate light and dark, as sunshine and shadow in play chase each other over their fair surface. This effect in the distance is most beautifully exhibited however, from the summit of Mt. Oread. Descending from this favorable near-by post of obser- vation, we take our way to the wagon-bridge. This is the favorite haunt, not onlv of occasional amateur artist for sketching, but of the whole tribe of Loungers. It is their "custom always in the afternoon" — especially of a Sunday afternoon in fine weather, to resort here in flocks and swarms. It is the Ultima-Thule in wandering io 8 TRAVELS AT HOME. of their shoals — as the dam beneath is that of the shoals of cat-fish in spring time. There is always something attractive to your true Lounger in the sight and sound of running water. It soothes and satisfies his soul. Like Tarn O'Shanter's witch, "a running stream he dares not cross" — that requires too much effort — he just stays on the bridge and watches it hurrying by. Here, with the music of the water rushing against the piers, and the roar of its torrent dashing over the fall, he surveys the finely curved shores and the still reach of the waters above, dotted with an occasional pleasure boat and "white sail gliding down," or the even stretch they take, churned into foam and breakers, as they rush on eastward under the railroad bridge; the little island in the stream below giving pleasing variety to its career. Here, too, the professional Lounger watches with interest what current of life flows past. He is almost willing that the dam should "go out" once more — that he might be furnished with the mental occupation of seeing it rebuilt ! Here, again, from his comfortable perch, he can watch the Santa Fe trains as they come and go; though alas ! he misses, of late years, their taking on of passengers from the platform below ! His crowd of old, on those occasions, was wont to be so miscellaneous in composition that one was reminded of Tennyson's prelude to "Lady Godiva:" " I waited for the train at Coventry, I hung with grooms and porters on the bridge." ****** * * Referring to the future a visit to the charming green glades of Bismarck Grove, we retrace our steps to our starting point. Here we are tempted by the verdure of South Park to TRAVELS AT HOME. 109 take that route, from whence, on the way, at the crossing of Henry street, we could obtain a fine foreshortened glimpse of West Lawrence, with the western bluffs for a background — as the Rocky Mountains wall up the western end of the streets of Denver. But, instead, we turn to the right, and follow Winthrop, to the corner of Tennes- see. Here, with the beautiful Trenton-red of the corner residence as a foreground, we get a fine bit of effect, looking north to the river and beyond. From the head, each of Tennessee and Ohio Streets also, pleasant river views are to be obtained. It was from the latter point especially that the regatta on the Kaw, a few years ago, was seen to the best advantage. The vistas to the south along both these avenues are favorable specimens of street views in Lawrence, which at this season of the year, from the wealth of foliage framing them, are a perpetual delight to a lover of the greens in nature. III. An Old Dramatist — thus easily the Lounger evades an issue of vexed controversy — an old dramatist represents to us on one occasion, the boon companions of a graceless and reckless reprobate, receiving reports on his sad condition; sick unto death, out of his mind, and babbling of green fields ! The worn out old voluptuary, the wonted familiar of the stones of Eastcheap street and tavern, is now stretched on a bed of pain from which he shall never rise. A reflex from the innocent and happy days of boyhood sweeps across the jangled chords of his unconscious brain, and "he babbles of green fields ! " They have no hopes of him now: that lapse into such senseless vagary of the imagination — such strange freak of that tongue which never wagged to them but of world- HO TRA VELS AT HOME. liness and wickedness — denotes that he is very far gone, indeed ! Forsooth, "he babbles of green fields ! " ******** One day in Brussels, the Lounger, in descending Rue Montagne de la Cour — that thoroughfare which pitches so steeply down from the plateau of the New, Town to the Old — chanced to glance through a break in the row of tall buildings that line it on the right; and, looking athwart broken lines of red and gray tiled roofs, over mellowed masses of buildings which slope downward to the plain, the vision stretched past the old city, its pinnacles and spires, and on across river, field and forest, to a far off horizon. It was a glance as through a window just opened in a high tower, while yet our feet touched the solid earth. It was a magnificent picture, deeply framed in by massive walls. Its unpremeditated, yet wondrously picturesque effect, was such that the Lounger may scarce lose its vivid impression so long as memory shall last. Now the Lounger did well to pause and enjoy this wonderful picture — for it was his "by right of discovery," not being discoursed of in any guide book — and then, too, he was entitled to all he could get, in part payment for thousands of miles of toilsome journey. Why should one go abroad unless to see something? But the busy Bruxellians, thronging past by the thousand every hour — why should it be anything to them ? Suppose one should delay his companion with: "Hold here, a moment ! Just look at that fine bit of effect through the opening there ! " His comrade would reasonably exclaim impatiently: "Oh fudge! Don't stop mooning here in the way of people ! you can see that any day of your life. Come along; we have only five minutes left to TRA VJEL8 AT HOME. I1T reach the Bourse and place that order for stock, and, after that, you know we agreed to meet those ladies, to lunch at the ' Milks ColonnesS If fine scenery is what you want, come with me to Switzerland this summer ! '* Another day abroad, the Lounger was strolling listlessly along the Heeren Gracht, near the heart of that "northern Venice," Amsterdam. If you have any doubt as to the identity of the Lounger, you can always detect him by the slowness of his gait. On this occasion he was on his way to a picture gallery, and consequently strolling even more tardily than usual. It was a pleasant day and a peaceful scene. Here were no hurrying crowds, and he had chance to loiter and enjoy the beautiful studies of color; the water of the winding canals, with gray stone bridges, and green trees bordering, all contrasting with the differing but harmonious tints of red in brick of wall and tile of roof, afforded by the quaint old buildings. It was all artistically perfect in tone of color, and shockingly "out of drawing," so far as lines were con- cerned — the Lounger being charmed not to find a single straight one in the whole picture. The streets wound in and out, and the buildings were guiltless of verticals anywhere. They give the stranger the impression, at first, that they are out on a "jolly drunk" — but that is not the matter. Too much water is the trouble instead of anything stronger. Well, the Lounger would have enjoyed these views greatly, but for lack of company. Do you know how hard it is to laugh when alone ? Just try it, my humor- ously inclined reader ! You will find that it requires something extraordinarily funny to constrain you to laugh all by yourself. You need sympathy also, to ! r 2 TEA VELS AT HOME. enjoy scenery to the utmost. Through some occult suggestion, the Lounger's memory flew back to a day spent in Bismarck Grove, when he was associated with two ladies of culture and artistic taste, as "hanging committee" of the Art exhibit. "Now," thought he, "if Mrs. Gray and Mrs. Black were only here, how much they would enjoy all this." ******** Well, just the other day, another lady — who is suffi- ciently near the Lounger to serve as mental stimulus, and preserve his wits from perishing through inanition — was at a tea party — what they call now-a-days "afternoon luncheon" — and sat at the same table with our two good friends, Mrs. Black and Mrs. Gray. Breaking one of those pauses with which the time spent at five-o'clock- teas is generally made up, jolly Mrs. Gray exclaims: — "Who is this Lounger that is mooning so much in the Journal of late — do you know? I should think he might amend his style a little, as well as find something worth writing about, beside perpetually harping on the beauty of the verdure around here. Who is he anyway — do you know? " The question was so direct, and withal so embarrassing, that the lady addressed — our Queen Consort — who passes by another sobriquet in society, had to truthfully acknowl- edge that she was "the Lounger," herself. — Now, unkind and unappreciative Mrs. Gray — and to be unappreciative of the Lounger's articles surely is unkind — you should know an author better ! It is impossible for him to "get over his stile," and almost equally difficult for him, at this beautiful season of the year, to "keep off the grass," no matter how many warning signs you may put up. TRAVELS AT HOME. 113 The Lounger can well conceive that this "babbling of green fields" must seem strange to many, and absurd that he should stand at street corners, admiring green vistas, when he might better go into the shops and transact some business, thus helping to "make business" these dull times ! Or, indeed, that he should affect to climb the stairways of any bank building in Lawrence for other purpose than to get his note extended therein ! Nevertheless, so long as people will love the beautiful, and all cannot spend time and money to seek it in travel in foreign lands, let the Lounger plead once more that our own folks may keep their eyes open to that beauty which is all around them. On any one of these fine days, come up to the summit of our Pisgah — Mount Oread — and see the Promised Land ! Men from other shores have found the landscape admirable in comparison — and it is well worth gazing upon, even if it is our own ! As the minister sometimes says — "let me repeat: " " We look too high for things close by— For far-off joys — and praise them, Whilst flowers as sweet bloom at our feet, If we'd but stoop to raise them." ON MOUNT OREAD. A juvenile member of the Lounger's family, once, on occasion of discussion as to a debatable visit to be made, attempted in all sincerity "to move the previous question" on the subject, by the following expression: "Why, I must go, I'm invited!'' 1 If invitations do imply an imperative necessity of corresponding attendance, the Lounger will certainly be on hand at the Kansas State University, on Commence- ment week — for he has been invited ! Yea, through the unerring certainty of the mails, and the generous favor of the "powers that be," he has received no less than three copies of a printed invitation to be present. Grate- fully acknowledging the compliment — -in triplicate — we accept all three. We are coming in full force. And we shall kindly encourage our numerous friends to come and share with us all the enjoyments that pervade this happy season, especially the intellectual feast "set down on the bills" of the Commencement menu. We shall go through the whole "bill of fare," as the countryman is said to do sometimes at an unwonted high-class hotel. The delicately flavored "purees" and the appetizing "consommes" being already disposed of, we shall now follow on with all the solid viands and "sweets," in due successive course: on to the valedictory and the benedic- tion, when — the parting word of good cheer having been spoken — "the favored guests" of the occasion shall be 114 OS MOUNT OREAD. 115 kindly sped to the world outside; but certainly not without a "souvenir" each, in the shape of "sheepskin!" In all the after years — among all the jocund feasts they may share, at all the "groaning boards" they may surround — haply there is "one class" of these guests of to-day that may never receive thereat any "favor" which shall be esteemed more precious than this ! fn the intervals between the sessions (if any are left), those of us that come up to this Jerusalem, or Mecca of ours — the University— -only on occasion of this annual pilgrimage, will do well to improve the opportunity to see what has been added since last year. Verily "the world does move," and our University with it! Once, as the Lounger easily recalls, only a little building at the north slope of Mt. Oread; now with its five commodious edifices — and one of these, magnificent Snow Hall, which arouses the enthusiasm of all beholders ! And yet, these '•surface indications" are but faint suggestions of what is going on inside. "For particulars, see" — Annual Catalogue. We will visit the library in its changed quarters — a new edition of itself, revised and improved.* We shall not fail to view the exhibit in the Drawing and Painting Department. It is "all set down in black and white" this year — or rather it is hung up in those tones. When we have enough of these comely moderns, we will call upon the language departments, for their classic models of Art — not forgetting the statues and casts of Demos- thenes, Kikero, Mercury, Zeus, — and the rest of "them literary fellows" of ancient times! But chiefly our researches will be made in Natural History, among the birds and beasts; our far-away cousins (like unto our- *Xo\v embracing 13.000 volumes, instead of number given on page 27. 1 1 6 ON MOUNT OREAD. selves — and yet happily unlike, even when skeletonized): the giant Megatherium, the Pleiosaurus, the Pleonasm, the Pterodactyl, the Dactyls and Spondees. Possibly the Lounger has got some animals mixed in here that really belong to another department. But at all events, he is very sure of the "bulls and bears," and especially of Prof. Dyche's buffalo. Poor fellow; there used to be no mistake about him ! There was plenty of him then, and he spoke (or rather bellowed) for himself; but now: " Last of his race, on battle plain, His voice shall ne'er he heard again." *.# * * * * * * Verily, Mr. Chancellor, this castle of yours "hath a pleasant seat. " What university in all the land hath such an outlook; one embracing such a magnificent scope of country on every hand? The Lounger fancies he hears some one whisper "Cornell;" but this deponent, knowing naught of Ithaca, "saith not." Our venerable poet, Holmes, said not long ago — con- trasting in reminiscence the outlook from the Harvard of his earlier years with that now circumscribed on every hand by intrusive, neighboring brick walls — that it was a rare good fortune to a boy to be born and reared where he could have the prospect of a natural horizon. If this be so; if the daily contemplation, in early years, of pleasing and inspiring scenery will have its specific effect both inward and outward — in developing a love for the beauty and freedom of nature, and in a corresponding widening of the mental horizon — then the students of Kansas University are especially blessed in their oppor- tunity. Certainly the natural horizon before them is wide enough to suggest and inspire mental "breadth of view." ON MOUNT OREAD. 117 The similitude of a morning landscape — looking east- ward — to the aspect of human life as seen from the stand-point of youth, is no doubt sufficiently trite, and yet it often comes upon the Lounger with renewed significance, as suggested by the view from this noble hilltop. Fresh and dewy, sparkling yet distinct is the foreground, as its waves of verdure swell upward to his feet. Beyond, the landscape spreads out fair to his vision, without shadow of cloud upon its face; but soon its middle distance merges in the haze that lies over the valley, concealing all but the tops of intervening ridges — the dim landmarks that youth intends to make upon its journey. Farther on, the broad horizon can scarce be even faintly traced, lost in the effulgent sunlight; the glamor with which hope irradiates the bright future of youth ! There is no perspective to this picture; the glow of faith has effaced it; youth needs none ! And confident Manhood: it, too, scarce feels the want of ''distance." Its landscape is symbolized by the view from the south and west windows of the University, just before noontide. A view of fertile fields and meadows to be tilled; and beyond, of stream and, if need be, of hills to be crossed with easy endeavor. Near to us — beautiful slopes, graceful and noble "lines of descent," that make and mark the transition from hill to valley. How beautiful it all is; how practicable everything is; how easily accomplished ! Everything is to our hand in this view; everything is possible. We reach forth our hand, and lo. it is done ! Life, health, strength are ours; Nature, jocund Nature, herself is ours ! ■• 'Tis in life's noontide she is nearest seen. Her wreath of summer flowers, her robe of summer green." I ! 8 ON MO UNT OREAD. And then comes the afternoon of life. The prospect is no longer all sunshine: shadows, clouds, and sometimes the darkness of storm sweep over it; but afterward comes the "clearing up," with all the charms and joys of nature enhanced by the contrast. The channels of experience are deepened, the springs of life renewedly filled, even by the storms that pass over us. Life has more signifi- cance. The tones of the afternoon landscape are more varied, richer and deeper; the tints of nature more harmonious — if we look eastward. There is enough perspective now; the horizon begins to grow distinct and sometimes sharply defined ! ^c =;: ^ :•: ^ * * * * There is a seat that often finds the accustomed Lounger now at eventide. It is one of the top ones of those cyclopean steps which buttress the entrance stone stairway of Snow Hall. Before him, the tops of the trees in North Valley of the campus, jut up from the tangled depths of wild-wood below. Beyond, lies a beautiful little valley, and the pleasant homes of West Lawrence. Farther on, a little circlet of water gleams within the foliage that lines the bank of the river, of which this apparent lakelet is but one of the windings made visible. Beyond this again, and foreshortened, lie the everlasting hills, which have seen differing races of savage men come and depart. Behind them, as the light fades from the hill- tops, its glow is caught up by the mountain-like banks of cloud that lie piled in massive cumuli; which glow, and then fade in turn, in the dusk of even. And lastly comes the night with its majesty of the heavens, wherein, one by one, come out "the stars invis- ible by day." IN THE WOODS. " Of all the beautiful pictures That hang on Memory's wall, The one of the dim old forest Seemeth the best of all." Some one has suggested that the Lounger's peregrina- tions have been quite restricted in their range, even for Travels at Home: embracing no greater extent than from the river to Mount Oread ! Admitting the fact, is not that doing pretty well for a lounger ? Walter Scott said of his "Marmion:" — "Mine is a tale of Flodden Field, And not a history. " and the Lounger might plead that his is chiefly a tale of the town-site, and not a gazetteer or map of Kansas ! He is free to admit that thus far he has had no occasion in " these presents" to utilize the railways of his country, but it is, perchance, high time to promote at least the patronage of the Lawrence livery stables. Let us then go abroad — say three miles or so out of town. On his recent visit here, Colonel Higginson was most impressed, as he more than once expressed, by the wonderful change made in the appearance of these prairies by the growing of trees. Thirty-two years had elapsed since he had seen Kansas, and the transformation of the landscape as exhibited from Mount Oread was marvelous in his eyes. Not so much, after all, for "the improve- 119 I2 o IN THE WOODS. ments, " the numberless houses, the tilled fields, and other signs of cultivation (for these he had somewhat antici- pated), but for the trees that aid so charmingly in diversifying the landscape, and which change what was once a monotonous expanse of plain, to a scene of sylvan as well as of pastoral beauty, scarce to be excelled. On the other hand, the old-time and primitive forests have largely disappeared. These, it is true, were chiefly confined to the borders of the larger streams, but just here at Lawrence we had quite a large body of timber, above and below the town, on the south banks, and especially across the river, where North Lawrence now stands. Of this, Bismarck Grove, with its fine old spreading elms, is but a remnant, haply spared. That, as the Lounger recalls, about marks the confines of the woods where they touched the prairie, but all intervening was a heavy, though not dense growth of timber, embra- cing grand old oaks, walnuts, cottonwoods and sycamores, through which the first road to Leavenworth wound deviously after leaving the ferry. In those days, when returning from an occasional visit to that town, belated at nightfall, after traversing the Delaware Reserve, how interminable and darkling seemed the path, meandering between those hoary monarchs, until we reached at last the sandy shores of the river, from whence, across the flood, shone dimly out "the lights of home." Then, routing out from his cabin on the bank, the old French half-breed ferryman, we were soon set across by skiff, or "floating scow," and back to the welcome precincts of the "historic city." But — the Lounger is here being betrayed, he fears, into that garrulous reminiscence which indicates approaching senility. ******** IN THE WOODS. I2 i From the slopes of Mount Oread, looking a little to the north of eastward, there is still to be discerned what appears quite a heavy body of forest, embracing the timber of the river about the mouth of Mud Creek, and stretching back to the upland beyond — a fair fragment of that heavy growth which once marked the whole course of the river as seen from this point. But the Lounger is "minded" to take his "gentle reader" with him on the little voyage of discovery which, within the short distance of three miles, raav afford an intimate impression of a bit of forest, or, at least, a study for a "wood interior." This is reached by taking the middle Lecompton road, west from town. After climb- ing the steep hill westward (or rather south-west) of "Hillhome," we turn in our seat to take a retrospective view of Lawrence. From this point, only the western and northern portion of the city is visible — the vicinity of the post-office being especially prominent — but the view embraces much beside that is very attractive; including, in the near foreground, the river valley, which assumes quite a park-like appearance, as beautified with the rounded, deep masses of foliage that line the little winding stream or ' ' branch " that intersects it. Lawrence lies in the middle distance, and beyond it the broad belt of forest already mentioned as extending to the eastward, while just to the right, Eudora is seen sleeping on the billowy plain that sweeps on to the far horizon, dim in the blue and hazy distance. It is but a short step after leaving this "coigne of vantage," till our road dips down into a wooded hollow; at first but a narrow gulch, but soon widening into a broad ravine, which, expanding, seeks the lower level of the valley of another Mud Creek. Oh ! hapless soil of I22 IF THE WOODS. rich, fatty, or ashen black, which so appropriately bestows the unpoetic name of Mud Creek upon so many Kansas brooks — would we ever willingly exchange your homely productiveness, to gain the sparkling limpidity which correlates with the sterile granite of mountain streams? Is there no happy medium; no land where the timely and bounteous rains of heaven — falling on the just as well as the unjust — may descend on fairly fertile alluvium, without carrying in solution to the streams and seaward so much of turbid yellowness and blackness ! To the left and onward, as we descend, trends a range of picturesquely sloping and rolling hills, covered with woods that late in the season afford quite a beautiful effect of variegated autumn coloring. Here is about as good sketching-ground for foliage — that is foliage in mass — as the Lounger is acquainted with in this vicinity. Then too, as the road winds along the margin of this forest, one comes in contact with sights and scents — of plant and shrub, of leaf and blossom — which carry him back with the swift telegraphy of memory to those days of boyhood when all such were very near and dear to the fresh and opening senses, the avenues to the mind and heart of youth. Traversing this road in the early summer, one gets at almost every step a luscious whiff, the scent of the wild grape in blossom. It is well worth the ride from town — and the carriage hire — to inhale once more this delicious fragrance, and to hear echoing in the deep wildwood the sweet notes of birds, especially the sweetest and clearest of all, that of the remembered "wood-robin" of the Lounger's . boyhood — which our naturalists insist should be known instead as the wood-thrush. The Lounger loves, indeed, the "dim old forest" of the present, not only for its own IN THE WOODS. 123 sights and scents and sounds, its "pictures" of to-day — but for the hundreds of others it suggests — the never-to- be-forgotten recollections of childhood: And still in memory fresh as then I seek each thicket, glade and glen, Where woodsy odors wild and sweet Rise up at every crush of feet : Where waves the plumy fern, and dank Green mosses carpet rock and bank. On knolls that boast " the Barrens'' name The mountain-pink, a sheet of flame. In distance burns— but glowing near. Azalea's trumpets fill the air. With pungent perfume blown afar. * The kalmias waxen clusters spread On rocky slopes— while overhead The dogwood drops its petal sn And fragrant with each wind that blow.-. By roadside blooms the sweet-brier rose. Far down along the forest glades, Upspringing, mid the woodland shades With graceful, true and tapering lines. As California's sugar-pines— The Liriodendron skyward showers A thousand glorious tulip flowers. Tinted with orange, green and gold. Its cups a honeyed nectar hold, Where bee and humming-bird in tune Make glad the lightsome air of June. Each cup, amid the glistening leaves, A largess to the summer gives, For dews of heaven it receives. —Queen of all forests yet. to me, The Pennsylvania tulip-tree ! 124 IN THE WOODti. Nor one of all the thousand rills Amid the everlasting hills, Dashing from rock to rock their spray, Or stealing silently away ; From Ammonoosuc's windings shy- To Mercede's sources far and high Where sharp Sierras pierce the sky ; Not one, or all of these, whose praise Poets sing in tuneful lays, Shall quicken pulse of mine in joy, Like that one brook I knew as boy. The rill that all the livelong day With rocks and pebbles smooth at play, Made everlasting roundelay. Where oft I paddled " barefoot 1 ' feet, Built my mill and sailed my fleet, Just where the woods and meadows meet. On sweeter stream I ne'er shall look Than one little nameless brook, Whose springs of life were near to mine, —The brook that ran to Brandywine ! IX AULD LANG SYNE. The Lounger has been revisiting the pleasant haunts of his youth — in Chester County, Pennsylvania. It may be from the predilection of early association, but — after some extended journey ings in later years — he still returns to these scenes with the fancy that none elsewhere are fairer or sweeter. His headquarters from which to take varied excursions, are made at the old county-seat town of West-Chester. Would that the Lounger could make this charming little town known adequately to the world; but that is, humanly speaking, impossible. West- Chester is sui generis, diffi- cult to describe, and scarce to be compared. However, one might intimate, to mind of a New Englander, somewhat of its perfections by saying that, in a manner, it is a kindly-sedate and scientific-minded Pennsylvania- Quaker Northampton. This would convey but a limited notion of its characteristics; as might also the further statement that it has long possessed the finest collections of minerals and mortgage-bonds, and has always used the best microscopes and made the best ice-cream of any town in the Union. What more could heart — of any town — desire ! And yet some restless people — and there are always such in every community — were scarce satisfied even with this; and but lately would fain try the desperate experiment of a transfusion of ''new blood" — of "enter- prise," we think they called it — into its body politic and 125 j 2 6 iy A UZ B 1. 3 YNB. economic. The is to get -Board get out an adve g book of •• advan- tage What was peculiarly Quakerish about this, howevc Actually conrmed itself very closelv to the truth'! Had this :perim- :ransmogrifying it into a ••nianufacturir.- : wn - would have badly spoiled it for a Lounger. But fori the healthy old borough survived the :k 3 and no a on still in its _ i old way- : [uiet improvement, while ts people continue to live well and live lor... — as before. — Wit .'dent roads throughout, charming dr: be taken in every direction from West Chester: along upland slo" - -haded woods, or dipping down into the valleys of rough lush mead _rant with the scent of mint, where the clear brooks _ and tinkling over their beds of pebbles. race all the- a in with ever new delight ! Four d the southward :ne to the valley of the Brandv : the point famed - Revo- d the heights of Birmingham, overlooking the valley, still stands the old "Meeting- Hotj : dark bluish-gray stone, around which the mbat cer. and in whose grave-yard adjoining, many of those who fell were buried, almost indiscriminatelv. Xear by, Lafayette was wounded, and when the American lines were here broken, Washington, and compelled to retreat, uncovering Philadelphia to the the British. On the roun :he wain Whose boughs have rustled in every br-r Through a nunc: ~ orm and calm — Star - of Birmingham. IN AULD L. By eman m I - trampled turf. -«_ .e and L:t ig-1 Left 8m O:' >od. on : ; r farmer. Still holds his _ im. * - * * * * * Cr _ the Brandywine. and retracing to the ird i few miles, the previous march that morning, of the columns of Cornwallis and Knyphausen, brings us to •od, near the site of Old Kenne* use. Longwood is almost the only home and assembly-place of the Pro_ Friends. This sec: — indeed that might be called which creed has none " (to misquote Milton) — was a "liberal -hoot from the QuaV. during the later Abolition period, and though quite limited in numbers, for awhile made '-quite a noise in the world:" embracing among its speakers at its annual reunions, many noted and gifted Reform, The building is but a modest frame structure, while just across the road is Longwood B Ground. hest kn as the last : f Bayard Taylor. The scenery of th: vhile am] has been fortunate in securing three poets for two of them, Buchanan Read and Bayard Taylor, belonging to it by birth, and the third, John G. W by long-time association with its people. Among the latter - he venera: air whom he has celebrated in his •• Golden Wedding ngwo<: •Fair falls on Kennev . s The mellow sunset of your - I2 8 IN AULD LANG >SYNE. The mastery of the portrayer of scenery, the born "poet of places," is evidenced by the manner in which Whittier sees and seizes the salient characteristics of a section, and thereby pictures the whole in a very few words: "Again before me with your nanies fair Chester's landscape comes, Its meadows, woods and ample barns, and quaint stone-builded homes : The smooth-shorn vales, the wheaten slopes, the boscage green and soft, Of which their poet sings so well from towered Cedarcroit. 1 ' But none sings it better than Whittier himself. In these four lines he misses little else than the clear-flowing streams, which, indeed, are scarce distinctive — being shared as well by New York and New England. Bayard Taylor's grave is marked only by a plain low granite column, relieved by a medallion portrait in bronze. On one side lies the love of his boyhood, his first wife, Mary Agnew, whom he married upon her death-bed. On the other, is buried his brother, Fred Taylor, Colonel of the First Pennsylvania (Bucktail) Regiment, who fell, bravely leading it on the first day of the fight at Gettys- burg. On his monument, no less than four tributes are rendered by admiring poet-friends — R. H. Stoddard, George H. Boker, Phebe Cary, and his brother. Bayard himself can well afford to sleep there without further memorial on his tomb than the simple inscription thereon: "Being dead, he yet speaketh; "—for many loving brother poets have embalmed his memory in verse, whose lines will live in literature. Among these comes to memory those of Whittier, addressing the neighboring scene: " Oh vale of Chester trod by him so oft- Green as thy June turf keep his memory ! Let Nor wood, nor dell, nor storied stream forget, Nor winds that blow round lonely Cedarcroft ! " IN AULD LANG SYNE. I2 p And so we make next, a short pilgrimage to "lonely," "towered Cedarcroft;" the home which Bayard Taylor made in the days of his prosperity, returning to dwell amid the scenes of his boyhood. The road we follow, traverses many of the scenes he describes in his own "Story of Kennett. " The house stands about a mile north of the village of Kennett Square, a station on the Phila. & Baltimore Central Railway. Bayard's only child, his daughter Lillian, has married in Germany; her mother also has returned to her native German land, and Cedarcroft has passed into the ownership of an eminent Philadelphia surgeon, now retired from practice. Evidently the doctor's ideas of "a fine place" are nearer the conventional ones than were those of Bayard Taylor. The native wildness of the fine woods which the poet loved, has been sacrificed. Some of his "immemorial chestnuts," which "westward" stood "a mount of shade," have been cut into rails; the underbrush in front has been cleared off, and the noble oaks trimmed up, so as to afford a vista of the mansion from the road. - The old farm gate at the entrance, has given place to a beautiful "porter's lodge." The house, a somewhat irregular pile of brick, two stories in height, with its "ivy- mantled tower," is, however, apparently much as Bayard had it, in the days he entertained therein right royally — too hospitably indeed, for his purse — his friends and fellow poets. -& ■;',': % $i t'.t 7p $ %: On the slope of a hill, three miles north of Cedarcroft, still stands an old two-story brick school-house. In this building, known as Unionville Academy, Bayard Taylor received, after the district school, all the education 10 ! o IN A ULD LA NG IS YNE. afforded him within walls. Its principal — Jonathan Gause r an old Quaker — was, as the Lounger recalls him, an almost perfect type of the school-master in Goldsmith's. 1 'Deserted Village," in his ponderous dignity and severity, tempered withal by that enthusiasm for learning which seldom fails to arouse the latent ambition of the scholar. In the lower story of the academy building, a district school was kept; and there, as an urchin of tender years, the Lounger first made acquaintance with Bayard Taylor, then a youthful pedagogue of seventeen. This teaching- was but for a term that bridged over an interval between his own schooling and going to learn the trade of printer. Two years passed by, wherein the writer had graduated one step — or rather a whole flight of stairs — upward into the Academy, where Bayard had studied. One day the Lounger, whilst at the principal's desk, by special favor, reciting his Telemaquc, found his lesson interrupted, as a fresh-faced stripling came in to bid his old preceptor "good-bye." It was Bayard Taylor! With many misgivings, his father had bought off his "time" as- apprentice at the printing office, and now he was off to see Europe, "With Knapsack and Staff !" In those days, and among that steady-going people, the tour of Europe meant far more than a journey around the world now-a- days, and such an undertaking for young Taylor, with his means — or rather with his lack of means — seemed, to the Quakers of Marlborough and Kennett, in the highest degree Quixotic. In a moment he had quietly passed out of the school-room, and into the region — in our youthful imaginations — where dwelt unexplored mystery and romance. Another two years — and our old academy is all excited by a visit from Bayard Taylor. His letters of travel — IN A UL D LANG 8 YN£. j - T compiled into a volume entitled "Views Afoot"— have become very popular, and kindly favored by the literary world, from the freshness of their observation and the novelty of their point of view. The young American who, making the tour of Europe on foot, has written so pleasantly of his experiences, is the literary sensation of the day. In our eyes, he has achieved fame, for he has published a book ! From this on, the world is familiar with the literary and personal career of the poet-traveler. In the old Academy, the teachers would sometimes take the new scholar to a special section of one of the long pine desks, lift up the lid showing the initials carved on the inside thereof, and say: -I give you the seat of Bayard Taylor ! " It is not within the Lounger's present scope— which is simply one of reminiscence— to render any estimate of Taylor's character and abilities. Poet, traveler, novelist, biographer, lecturer, editor and critic— so truly versatile as to be eminent in many fields— time will determine, ere long, his true place in literature. Minister of the United States to one of the great empires of the world; his country's honored representative in that land where once, a poor stranger youth, he toiled on foot from town to town; and, finally, his obsequies thronged by great ones of the earth;— the writer would praise and honor Bayard Taylor to-day, in recollection, not chiefly for his talents and achievements— worthy as they were— but for one thing, than which his life held nothing worthier or manlier. It was that in the day of his assured success, when culture had graced and fame had crowned him, he forgot not to love and cherish the humble country girl, the companion of his youth, who had given him in those early days her maiden love and faith. The pages of his 132 IN ATJLD LANG SYNE. "Poet's Journal" still speak eloquently his life-time tender memories of the early loved and lost. ****** *%ifc One of the features of this section, in primitive days and down to the Lounger's boyhood, was the prevalence of the old-time country inn or "tavern. " This prevailed, indeed, from the old Colonial period down to the advent of the railroad, which rendered obsolete the old thorough- fare of travel — the turnpike road with its Conestoga wagon. These ancient hostelries, devoted in those days to the 1 'entertainment of man and beast, " survived their legitimate use, deteriorating to the entertainment of man only in such manner as tended to confound him with the "beast." Briefly, they survived simply as drinking places, where the rural population were too often tempted into habits of loafing and tippling. This was their dark page of history. Now they are fast passing away; an enlightened public sentiment seeing no occasion for licensing them longer. Their venerable, tall, framed sign-posts, with the "sign" swinging and creaking in the wind, have been taken down. These signs, with their appellations, were curiously reminiscent of old England, as commemorated by Dickens: — The Red Lion — the Black Bear — the White Horse — the Ship — the Anvil — the Sickle and Sheaf — the Hammer and Trowel ! The similitude of these things, as painted on the sign by the local artist, was often some- thing wonderful to behold ! As reminiscent, too, of " Merrie England," as is the scenery of this section, are the old hawthorn hedges which prevailed here as in no other portion of the United States. These are fast being supplanted by Osage- orange; and only occasionally now may you find some IN A ULD LANG 8 YNE. j~~ ancient ones, grown almost into trees, where yon may sit "beneath the hawthorn's shade." The local names here— especially those of counties and townships— were largely "brought over" by Penn and his companions, from their old homes:— Berks, Bucks, York, Lancaster and Chester being names of prominent shires in England. The emigrant of all times has been glad to remind himself in every way possible of the land he left behind. "The skies change but not the man." —The Lounger is no exception to this feeling: To me, though wand'ring East or West, Where Nature spreads her choicest, best, No mounts a fairer prospect show Than thy north fields, East Marlboro' ; Whence Bradford towns and Laurel woods. And Newlin's meadows, wet with floods, But heighten th' opposing scene, Where plains of FaUowfield lie green, With Doe Run Valley spread between; And westward rise, like sloping lawn, The hills of Highland and of Cain ! How oft in boyhood's early day, I viewed those hills ten miles away. And longed for all the world unknown That lay beyond Their purple zone ! * * * * =:-• # # * That world unknown has come to me From Eastern hills to Western • In manhood sought, th' horizon shifts- Its purple glamour fades— and lifts. Onward !— the glamour lifts, and fades,— Till age draws on with twilight shades. Hap] rm.3, Earth's glamour rests on land or s< To eye of faith, the -lory lies On world unknown beyond the skies. BY THE SEA. '• Spirit that breathest through my lattice— thou That coolest the twilight of the sultry day,— Gratefully flows thy freshness 'round my brow : Thou hast been out upon the deep at play. Riding all day the rough blue waves, till now. Roughening their crests and scattering high their spray, Aud swelling the white sail— I welcome thee To the scorched land, thou wanderer of the sea I" Familiar to memory since boyhood, these lines with which Bryant opens his address "To the Evening Wind," came fondly to the lips of the Lounger, one recent 'eve- ning, as the train which had borne him over weary miles of "scorched land" swept into the cool stone paved station of the West Jersey Railroad at Cape May. The "evening wind" was duly on hand to meet and greet us, together with the "smiling host," to whom we had telegraphed for rooms. In spite of Shenstone's famous saying, and though it is no doubt true that in point of importance the inns are justly one half the "inns and outs of travel," — at this season of "heated terms," the summum bonum of felicity consists in finding the welcome warm, but the rooms cool. And the supper-room too, was delightfully cool, as the descriminating waiter — with the possible anticipation of a future fee — placed us most favorably before an open win- dow looking directly out upon the ocean, and so near that the spray could almost dash in upon us, laden with that 134 BY THE SEA. I35 salted scent that is so deliciously fresh when approached from the fevered land. Once more the sights and sounds and scents of the unforgotten sea are ours ! The rich hues of evening are deepening on the waters — blue waves come chasing each other shoreward, combing there into translucent green, and breaking into lines of foam. Farther out, the sea is picturesquely dotted with sailing craft; some with sails filled with the evening breeze, glistening in snowy white; others more distant, glimmering in ghostly gray— and yet others, hull down, with masts only peering above the horizon, telling freshly the tale of earth's convexity. It is a scene for a William T. Richards water-color — and indeed the visitor to the Metropolitan Museum can note in the series of Richards' sketches there exhibited, that he has reproduced nearly every possible peaceful effect of sea and shore and skv t > be witnessed on this Jersey coast, which he has long frequented. With all the aesthetic conditions so favorable, including the hotel table itself, the Lounger was enabled to "mate- rialize" a very fair supper, and the precedent then and there established has since been so consistently pursued, that there is now every prospect of his realizing an additional pound for every five dollars spent — which would be a very fair rate of exchange indeed, for a seaside season. ******** With many visits since intervened, the Lounger is always freshly reminded here of his first trip to Cape May, made a score or two of years ago, in his early days of diffidence — in his green and callow youth. This as is well known — is an old-time resort, and was then a famous and fashionable watering-place. As a bov on his 136 BY THE SEA. father's farm, he had heard of its charms, and determined to "take in" a few of its enjoyments, in the interregnum "betwixt the walnuts and the wine" — the wheat and oats harvests. He had, indeed, to spare but a few days and a few dollars, which latter would not reach very far at any of the long, tall-pillared caravanseries which then lined its shore, in the fashion that continues to the- present. But the little glimpse of watering-place life there afforded him, showed in dazzling and bewildering colors to the neophyte. There were hops in the dining-room, after it was cleared, in the evenings, and the unacquainted Lounger stood at the open door as if it were the gate of Paradise— longing, but not venturing in — even though a gilded youth from the city, whose acquaintance he had made on the boat, kindly but patronizingly invited him to "join in." (The Lounger now shrewdly guesses this gay young fashionable to have been a clerk from some Market street grocery.) Most unwillingly, however, he left this enchanted ground for home — first paying, of course, his bill at the office. That could hardly have been a long one, so soon; neither was it "as wide as a church door, but it wa> enough." It was deep enough to reach almost to the bottom of the pocket of the young man from the farm; but after all, he did not "mind" that half so much as the careless remark with which that genial but gorgeous clerk in the office sped the parting guest: " You dont stay long with us, Mr. Lounger ! " Long years have flown since then, and that clerk has possibly ere this "disremembered" his casual, and perhaps, politely meant remark; but you see the Lounger- has not! With some murmured reply about urgen' BY THE SEA. 137 business requiring his presence in his city counting-house, he turned his back upon that celestial scene — with that vivid (and it seemed to him unfeeling) sentence ringing in his ears: "You dont stay long with us, Mr. Lounger ! " $ * * ***** Alack ! Cape May is still here with its long colonnaded hotels, its bands of music, its hops and its throngs — the latter not so much increased since other resorts have multiplied — but the youthful glamour is all off with the Lounger ! These people are not princes and princesses, nor even lords and ladies in disguise. They are simply good, common-place, every-day folk taking their recrea- tion — dipping and tumbling around in the surf with quite unromantic abandon in the mornings, and lounging in the halls after dinner, with paper novels hugged to their bosoms (as Howell notes), the fore-finger still holding the spot where the sensation flagged. And these giddy girls in tennis suits, "having a good time" in their own "careless and happy" fashion; — are these the beautiful fairies, the "angels without wings " of the Lounger's early vision ? It would seem not — and yet possibly they closely resemble their mothers and grandmothers, — and it is only "the grave stranger come to see the play place of his" boyhood, that has changed after all ! One tiling he will scarce dispute, — -that people seem to be taking their summer holiday in a comfortable, and on the whole, sensible fashion here at Cape May. Either because the tide of extreme fashion has deserted this for newer resorts, or for some other reason, there appears to be less show and more substance in the enjoyment here. This is now, at least, a good, sensible, comfortable place for those who come to the seaside for recreation in rest. i38 BY THE SEA. And whatever other changes the years may have wrought and brought, the ocean is here just the same as ever — still rolling its tireless waves on this noblest stretch of beach on the Atlantic coast; here with its freshening inspiring breezes, and its thousand charms of changing sky, reflected by morn, noon and eve in changing sea. Even with its grotesque groups in the foreground, rolling like so many porpoises in the breakers, it refuses to be vulgarized. An old-time Lounger, whose point of view may have changed on many things, can be thankful that nature here is still unchanged for him ! That — " The radiant beauty shed abroad, On all the glorious works of God, Shows freshly to his sobered eye As e'er it did in days gone by." IN THE SURF. In the year 1609, Henry Hudson, a distinguished English mariner, on his third voyage to this country, attempted to enter the Delaware and subsequently landed at what is now known as Cape May, after he had narrowly escaped losing his gallant galliot, the "Half Moon," by ship-wreck. Fourteen years later, Cornelius Jacobson Mey, a Dutch navigator, rounded the south point of New Jersey, and named it after himself. He called what is now the Delaware, South Bay, and the mouth of the Hudson, North Bay; hence we still have the name North River for that stream which empties into the latter. The first European proprietors obtained this part of New Jersey from nine Indian chiefs by actual purchase. During the iSth century, the Cape attracted the attention of fishermen who were engaged in captur- ing whale, blackfish and sea-lions which then abounded in her waters. The above is history, and is largely drawn, as is most of the historical and statistical matter of the Lounger's essays, from the local guide-book. Whenever you find him unusually replete with facts, you may set it down that he has been reinforcing his own splended memory of events that transpired in the last century, with some acqui- sitions from the guide-book. It is altogether the safest way. Notwithstanding, however, that the above cited is history, it does not inevitably follow that it may not be 139 4° IN THE SURF. true. The Lounger would carefully guard the mind of the young reader against the impression that whatever is set down in the books as history is necessarily false. A strong presumption in favor of the authenticity of the above narrative lies in the fact that it does not pretend to claim that Captain John Smith discovered Cape May. The Lounger believes that this point is the only one along the Atlantic coast which this veracious and ubiqui- tous traveler failed to touch upon, either in his vessel or his Narrative. We are referring now, of course, to the original story-telling John Smith, and not to his multitud- inous namesake of the New York city directory. Even the latter's "funeral knell," if tolled, would be too long a story altogether. About ninety years age (to be exact) an old Quaker farmer, living inland a few miles from Cape May, used to come down to the shore to bathe in the surf. The neighbors regarded this as a very strange and rather dangerous freak withal. Even large vessels had been known to go to pieces in the breakers — and why not this crank ? They used to follow him down on the chance of seeing this happen. Some of them doubtless were wreckers or wreck-savers by profession, and ready to claim the pieces, or salvage. They used to assemble thus on the beach to the number of twenty or more — say twenty-three to be exact — of a morning, on such occasions. Finding that the man came out all right and that it "would wash," they gradually took to imitating him. Hence the origin of surf-bathing ! The above is tradition. Tradition is not always as unreliable as history, but generally runs it very close. The difference, as the Lounger apprehends it, is about thus. — With history, either the circumstance took place in IN THE SURF. 141 time and manner, and with the person indicated, or else it is absolutely false. With tradition, the circumstance probably transpired, or something like it; but, perhaps, a thousand miles away, a thousand years before, to a thousand other fellows. So it may be strictly true in a race sense, though slightly incorrect in an individual one. Now, like the William Tell myth, this tradition of the origin of surf-bathing may not be properly located in jersey at all, but may have happened in Sweden or Syria, to some of our Aryan or Unitarian ancestors. But they tell it down at Cape May all the same. Anyway the custom has grown and multiplied until now-a-days we, who are of the ''interior department," no longer "go down into the sea in ships," but in bathing dresses ! Some of these are not exactly in "ship-shape" either. The whole Atlantic coast is being parceled out into bathing and watering-place stations — "cities by the sea." Every few miles, already you come upon them anew, sown thick "as leaves in Vallambrosa," or as empty tin cans around a western town on the plains. In a few years more Whittier might find no spot left where he could pitch his "Tent Upon the Beach." — Were the Lounger an artist — a Clays, an Achenbach, a Richards or DeHaas, for instance — the world would soon be the richer for his sojourn by the sea. What magnificent marines he would then paint ! Even if onlv a skilled amateur, he would still be attempting to imitate Rehn, or Bricher, or Niccoll, in transfixing upon paper some hint of the wondrous effects that enchant his eyes; translating some of the thousand harmonies of tint — the rich colors of water — into appropriate water-colors. As it is, he is only an "impressionist," with but little faculty of reproducing his impressions. EVENING AT CAPE MAY. I. Rich gleams of gold upon a western sky, — Broad stretch of gold upon a quiet sea; — Shore-seeking waves thai softly break and die In flaky foam that melts upon the lea: Dieth the Day as soft and tranquilly! The stars and crescent moon come out on high; The beacons on the Sea-Wall shine,- ami far Across the bay, Henlopen's ruddy star Kindles, and signals eve's departing light: Slowly, on land and sea, descends the Night! II. A leaden sky hangs o'er a leadei Keen lightnings quiver over wave and land; Deep thunders roar, — and thunders ceaselessly A sullen surf, hard beating on the sand; Before the gale the ,u r ull drifts aimlessly; — The tides of rain and surge meet on the strand; — A murk of storm blots out Henlopen light, And all the world fast darkens into night. 142 A r ST. A! Gl - I INK. • in's Hi' >ss grown wail The tiilc^ of 0< lid fall: \s lapping of the tides, Tim The course of empires, dynasti< They rise, they fall, and who shall i me, who lenoweth yesterday, law and shall to morrow know. Whether th( ebb and flow Shall bear our ' I To "heig - < )r. late or soon, the Right defied, dl crumble every mount of pridi Ami whelm her in Oblivion's tide! i ng tlie memories of her reign, QOnarch of the land and main. Queen of two hemisphei »ud Spain ! The centuries have come ami gone, Claiming her conquests one by one. all her deeds of valor d< Mere on our shores beneath the sun, One massive fort ^\ mouldering stone Preserves her memory one alone, — San Marco, now Fori Marion. ****** L4S i 4 4 AT 8l\ AUaUXTINE. Without command or tap of drum, Phantoms in armor, rayless, dumb, How Fancy's shadowy legions come ! It needs not captain, troop and gun To give the Old Fort garrison. Lone figure from thronged History's page; Last watch-tower of the Middle Age; An outpost of a force withdrawn; A lingerer, who waits alone, Unconscious of his comrades gone; A sentinel with ward to keep, Who slept the centuries' dreamless sleep,— Still standing thus, so silent, grim, As Sleep and Death were one to him: 'Twixt waters blue and meadows green, Thus stands thy Fort — St. Augustine ! INNS AND OUTS OF EUROPE. When books of travel are full of inns, atmosphere and motion, they are as good as any novel. -Augustine Birr ell. 11 BEFORE THE CURTAIN. Too early for the play ! Musing I sit 'Mid hollow silence and a half-lit gloom, While shadowy ushers move about the room. Seating the early comer as they flit. Unreal all the aspects of the place Save one, whereon what pictured fair might seem, A. southern land of mountain and of stream, Some artist bold the curtain fain would trace. What though the painter crude in color be ! Now while the music swells into a tune, Heard once in far-off land 'neath summer moon, I blend his scene with hues of memory. So, mellowing hour and throbbing tune and he Draw back my heart, fair Italy, to thee ! * * * * * # * * * * Brightest of visions yet to me— A scene of panoramic glory— Of emerald hills and summits hoary. Bold curving shore and promontory— The last fond glimpse of Italy. Thou comest back, Lake Maggiore : How sparkle in the sun thy waves. Or lap the shining sands so stilly ! What tender glow of color bathes Thy far-off towns — or nearer, laves The wall of tower and campanile ! The blue of distant mountain range Whose summits to the clouds are given, Makes.. symphony, in subtlest change, With blue of lake and blue of heaven. 146 FORE THE IN. lore's tinted tide, His oars a Btalwart boatman plied, Wl >red by t awning, A lounging tourist stretched be In light and shade, a glorious bay Encircled by the mountains, lay The lake .dor i big hours of Bummer day. bowers ckward from The - islands. Ablaz As i astward in the drew, The farther mountains lift in view,— • The flve-cleft peak of Monte Kosa And other Alpine heights he knew— boatman fain would tell— The Fahlhorn and the Mi-- Usl bold m front. S ro Is lake and Lovelj all well. But ere the traveler seek-- I it.' Mont Leone, i wind-swept realm of dashb at, A bhat guard Simp] ir— and b irop the our— re Intra's pro [ ire; Float idly by Pallanza' : — be mind Sha he dinim Of \ 'er were liin; By a • ash -in ; - try; Of beau; at curve and trend. Of pearly peaks that heavenward tend— es that arch and downward bend— (At rose of dawn or gold of even When Hushes all the face of heaven) Reflecting all their radiant glory In thy fair face— Lake Magglor< ! H7 148 BEFORE THE CURTAIN. Up goes the curtain ! As its folds arise My vision fades— the music sinks, and dies. Italia' s sunny skies I view no more, But moonlit ramparts of cold Elsinore: A northern air "with mystery is rife And all the portents of the tragic life. What is the real? Not life's usual pace— This slow procession of the commonplace ! Let Life move faster with a A-aried train ! Vanish the Present ! Give us hack again That fuller life of passion, joy and pain; That pulsing life replete, come player, bring ! With mad unrest of Prince and guilt of King ! Such is the Drama's— such the Player's power: His fancy thralls us for one magic hour. This is the actual — this, that stirs and moves To the soul's depths— these deepest hates and loves That sway the heart to joy, the hand to strife ! Aught less is dream— this is the real life ! Oh power of Genius ! While unreal seems My real past as is the land of dreams— Thou peoplest all the living world for me With forms that never were, hut ave shall be ! MINE EASE IX MINE INN. "Whoe'er lias traveled life's dull round, Where'er hi may have been; May sigh to think he still has found The wannest welcome at an Inn." This is not the first time, by any means that Shenstone's cynic linos have been quoted. They have just been brought freshly to the Lounger's recollection, through being cited anew in an artistic circular, charmingly illustrated, descriptive of the Ponce de Leon hotel of St. Augustine, which is said to be the finest hostelry in the world. It would be a great pleasure to the Lounger to respond to this ''card of invitation," and renew his acquaintance with Florida and that delightfully quaint old town, one of the oldest on this continent — through the medium of a visit at the Ponce de Leon, the Cordova and the Alcazar; — or, at least one of those "Spanish-Moresque Palaces, set amidst the luxuriance of the orange, the palm and the vine," — with their "courts, plazas, marbles, mosaics, fountains, etc.," — all "Spanish of the Renais- sance, period. " As all these palaces are now under one ownership, it makes but little difference to Mr. Flagler which invitation the Lounger may accept— while "the best is none too good" for him. Yet inasmuch as. unfortunately, the "warmest welcome" of the Ponce de Leon, costs twenty-five dollars per A Next evening found us at Queenstown, and once more stopping at a "Queen's Hotel," the last of our Inns, and the very last of that series which is so numerous in the United Kingdoms as to suggest the popularity of some of those "Queens of England," whose list — and wardrobes — Agnes Strickland hath inventoried. The next morning the Lounger dropped into the Cunard office, and inquired for any news of the steamer, and of the state of the weather seaward. For the first, the boat would be standing into the roadstead in an hour or two; and there was a cable from the New York Herald Weather-Bureau that a storm wave was sweeping across the Atlantic ! But you never find the New York Herald reliable? — queried the Lounger. Well, their weather predictions are generally fairly verified, — was answered, 2 4 8 LAST INNINGS. for the Lounger's satisfaction. And this was to be all he was to receive from the shilling that the Lady had made him invest ! Two hours later, and as they looked out into the harbor, there was the Cunarder quietly at anchor, waiting for the Lounger and the last London mail; and just before they got aboard the little tender that took them off, he wrote, in the register of the Queen's, which previous travelers had converted into something of a memorial album, these lines of Good-Bye: — Old World ! we leave you now with some regret ; Glad have we been, amid your scenes to roam; We own their charms ;— but fairer, dearer yet, Are the bright skies and spreading vales of Home ! THE CITY OF BY-GONE YEARS. There is no superstition so wide-spread in Europe as that of a sunken city which has disappeared below the surface of a sea or a lake at some unknown period in the past. When the waters are rough, the tips of the spires of its churches may be seen in the trough of the waves ; on calm days one hears the distant sound of their bells, drowned by the ocean. The name of this city in Germany is given as Vineta, and it lies in the vicinity of the island of Rugen. E.Werner has a novel entitled ' ' Vineta," which is based on this superstition. In Brittany this sunken city is called Is, and various places along the coast are pointed out as its site. Ernest Renan has made use of the old legend in his " Souvenirs," as follows : " It seems to me that I have in my own heart a town of Is, which still has its obstinate bells that ring for the sacred offices and call for men who hear no more." —American Notes and Queries. There is an old, old legend That beareth a charm to me; — A fanciful tale that lingers By the shores of the German Sea. It tells of a sunken city Whose towers the waters lave — The grandeur of by-gone ages Now resting beneath the wave. Down many a hundred fathom It slumbers quiet and long, With all its wonders and treasures;- A city of story and song ! 249 250 THE CITY OF BY-GONE YEARS. Its every marvellous palace The water-gods hold in fee; Its halls are the homes of the mermaids, Its pavement the floor of the sea ! Oh ne'er to its topmost turret Was deepest plummet sent; — Nor has foot of the boldest diver Trod its loftiest battlement ! But sometimes at eve, in autumn, When the sun sinks slowly down, Darting the shafts of his splendor On the grave of the buried town, — When, over the mirror of waters Burnished with crimson and gold, Float the streamers of cloudland glory By the legions of Sunset unroll'd — Then the voices of restless Ocean, Sounding from year to year — Are still'd with the tumult that bears them — And a music falls on the ear ! The bells of unseen steeples Swing magically to and fro, Ringing tones of silvery sweetness Up from the depths below. THE CITY OF BY-GONE YEARS. 251 And then, to enchanted senses, Through a golden mist, uprears A pageant of marvellous beauty — The City of By-Gone Years ! Pinnacle, dome and belfry, Palace and knightly hall, Fortress with rampart and bastion And pennon on castle wall — The myriad roofs of its mansions, Street, column and portal proud — Float upward, above the sunset And hang in the sunset cloud ! Then — wonderful picture of beauty ! Roof, rampart, tower and spire, With more than their old-time splendor, Glow bright in the sunset's fire ! Awhile burns the magical city By the parting sunbeams kissed, With flushes of rose and of crimson, Of ruby and amethyst ! But e'en as we gaze — lo ! it fadeth — Fadeth the purple and gold, Swift changing to evening shadows ! — And the night comes, dark and cold ! ****** 252 THE CITY OF BY-GONE YEARS. And thus in the Autumn of Lifetime — By the shore where its sunsets glow, Through the crystalline waves of Remembrance, Rise the visions of Long Ago ! 'Tis the one, of all teeming fancies, That fondliest reappears, Which Time had buried the deepest In the grave of our long-lost years. And sweetest of mortal music, With tone that clearest swells — The chimes of our happy childhood, Rung upwards by Memory's bells ! How oft to enchanted senses Through the golden mist, uprears That pageant of marvellous beauty, The city of by-gone years ! With more than its youthful glamour, With splendors grown manifold, Shine its roofs and its spires, in the glory Of fancy's sunset gold ! The steps of its rocky castle, The stones of its rugged street, That wearied each untrained muscle, And wounded our youthful feet, THE CITY OF BY-GONE YEARS. 253 Now shine in the magic radiance With glisten of precious stone, In semblance of marble and jasper, Of agate and chalcedone ! Forgotten youth's toil and sorrow, Banished its care and pain; While, brightened with ten-fold luster, Its triumphs and joys remain. But soon, like the somber nightfall, Chill age upon manhood crowds, And memory's Fata Morgana Shall fade, like the sunset clouds ! * * * * * Where then, is the City Eternal, "By saint and by prophet foretold," Shining aye, with a glory supernal Transcending the ruby and gold ? No vision of human fancy, No city of earth or of air, May hint but the faintest promise Of marvels the future shall bear ! Each splendor of cloudland shining, Each pearl, and each tinted shell, Prefigures an infinite beauty And glory ineffable ! 254 THE CITY OF BY-GONE YEARS. How bright the beatified mansions, Where "the pure in heart" take their abode In that radiant City Celestial, "Whose builder and maker is God ! " What language of men or of angels Shall tell what its glories may be, Whose domes arch the Universe endless — Whose foundations — Eternity ! "Where is neither beginning nor ending" Lo ! the spire of its Temple uprears, Whose chimes, rung at dawn of Creation, Commingled the Music of Spheres ! That we, its glad belfry and pprtal, With "the eye of the spirit," may see; — May dwell in The City Immortal — God grant it to you and to me ! IN MIDSUMMER MOOD. Those things do best please me That befal preposterously. -Mids u m m er- Nigh t ' s Dream . HOW JOAQUIN WALKED OUT. He was a brick: so said they all, — And hefty as a brick let fall, Down dropping through the summer sky Upon the head of passer-by, Down dropping through the filmy air, On brick-top head of passen-jare. I loved a maid of the wild Tagf asters, — Bronze-hued, brown-eyed, with lips like wine, With a soul tip-toed and stretching higher, (Reaching up to my soul's desire, Fiercely fond and full of fire) — And a flat-foot fit for a number-nine. Let friends be false — let friends be true, Let wine be old — let love be new, Let fields be green — let fields be bare, • And sun-shafts shoot through shimmering air,- With bright skies arching and bending over, Trill of tree-frog and lay of lover, The hum of bees and sweet scent of clover, — Home, friends and all, by the white sea-wall, To win new loves, or to serve new masters, I left the Sierras and wild Tagfasters ! 256 MIDSUMMER MADNESS. The height — and the heat — of midsummer is here! "The Dog- Star rages." So doth also "ye managing editor," because, forsooth, the Lounger has lately chosen to lounge in cool and shady coverts rather than in "the keen sunlight of publicity " — the columns of the Journal. "Why doth the heathen rage and imagine a vain thing?" Undoubtedly the Journal readers would prefer to grant the Lounger a summer vacation, once for all, to having him parade in these columns in coatless and cravatless mental dishabille of hot weather. Just why the Dog-Star should rage and par consequence the world grow mad, either in July or August, the Lounger has never been able to determine. To him, it has appeared that Sol rather than Sirius was accountable for this torrid heat that fries men's brains and coagulates their wits. Sirius-ly, the Lounger takes no stock in this Dog-Star theory! The hapless victims of lunacy (mental moonshine — derivation, Luna — See?) are prone to imagine themselves the only sane, and all the rest of mankind demented. Possibly that is the matter with the Lounger now, — but he does appear to strike a good many of late, afflicted with midsummer madness. Either several people in the world of literature are off their balance, or else the Lounger is slightly off — his base." "It is a mad world, my masters ! " First, here comes Estes & Lauriat, book publishers — 18 257 258 MIDSUMMER MADNESS. with an advertisement in the "Atlantic." "Do you always know just what to do ? If not, let us recom- mend Mrs. Florence Howe Hall's 'Social Customs,' (price $2.00) and its baby relative, 'The Correct Thing/ (price 75 cents); for, with both these books, one can make no mistakes in life, as every possible question may be answered from their combined wisdom." This is midsummer-madness with a vengeance ! It is as astound- ing as the declaration of the escaped poor-house "luny" who assures you he is King Solomon, on his way to return the visit of the Queen of Sheba, and anxious to sell you one of his cast-off crowns of gold for two-bits, towards paying his railway fare ! Verily E. & L. are as luny as a loon; as mad as a March hare; as crazy as a — Cimex lectularius ! "Do you always know just what to do ? " Just reverse that, please, and put it— Do you ever know just what to do ? The Lounger has imagined sometimes that he did, but generally discovered his error before long, when too late! As a rule, instead of there being just "a right way and a wrong way " to choose from, — which is easy enough,— it has appeared to him a very perplexing ques- tion as to the better of two right ways, or the lesser of two or more evils presented. And then, whichever course he did decide upon usually led him to regret that he hadn't taken another! Fortified with these two books — aggregating a cost of only $2.75 — "one can make no mistake in life, as every possible question may be answered from their combined wisdom." Indeed, this is very tempting — infallibility for $2.75 ! And yet, Messrs. E. & L., we will not invest ! Unlike Mr. Blaine and Henry Clay, the Lounger would rather be President sometimes than to be always right. MIDSUMMER MADNESS. 259 The Lounger's next candidate for a Midsummer Asylum is a Reverend Somebody, who furnished a paper for the recent Chautauqua Assembly of Missouri. By the way — is there any other association than that of sound between "chalk-talks" and "Chautauquas?" Possibly only this — that both alike press close up on either hand, to the frozen summit of intellectuality. The theme of the Reverend's paper was the "Women of Shakespeare," and he had undoubtedly made up his mind to strike it at once, like a cyclone, tearing the whole subject up by the roots and bearing it aloft on the wings of the tempest — and of a vivid imagination. He "struck twelve the first time," and very promptly! "My theme is the Women of Shakespeare. 'Women' and 'Shake- speare' are the two best words in the English language ! " Well ! — The Lounger will prudently file no exception to the first, in this connection, but in all common sense — and in all reverence, as well — what becomes of such words as God, life, immortality, father, brother, home, friend, faith, love, truth, virtue, justice, honor, and a hundred others that should rise from heart to lip, ages before any personal name, however great, should be spoken or recalled ! This is the veriest midsummer- madness of Shakespeariolatry that the reverend gentle- man is infected with — and his only excuse may be that other writers who should know better have taken on this silly habit and fashion of loose, exaggerated speech whenever the name of Shakespeare is mentioned. Even so great a man as Emerson himself once fell into it, and wrote some such nonsense. Our Chautauqua hyperbolist then went on to enunciate his proper pet theory — which was that while the men of Shakespeare were often quite faulty in conception, the 260 MIDSUMMER MADNESS. women of the dramatist were always unique and perfect in idealization — with the possible exception of Ophelia — who, in point of fact, went about as crazy as the reverend gentleman himself. On the other hand, some other Shakespearean crank would promulgate that the women are "as flat as dishwater," while his men are admirable characterizations throughout ! This is the amusing yet saving point of average Shakespearean criticism; — the commentators, like Kilkenny cats, devour each other. Each admires, and each discards; — what is the poison of one is the meat of another, until, like the good Mussul- man's swine — " Quite from tail to snout 'tis eaten." ******** There was a man of the name of Stevenson who startled the world not long ago, with his rocket-like ascent into the literary firmament. What has become of the author of that "Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde," "The New Arabian Nights," and "Treasure Island?" Can it be the same hand that once "drew the long-bow" of story-telling with such marvellous power and skill, that now sends such a puerile shot as "The Black Arrow?" This is no tightly-strung cord indeed, whose rebound shall plant the feathered shaft in the bull's-eye center, quivering! On the contrary, it is the loosest sort of string, scarce attached at either end; — - and it goes trailing along — one feeble and frayed fold of invention following another with no logical continuity or sequence; — a weak thread spun out weekly. Poor Louis Stevenson ! His is no violent case of mental aberration ! Failing physical energies find a reflex in failing mental power. He needs "rest and a change." ******** MIDSUMMER MADNESS. 261 But the Haggard novel-writing fiend is as gaunt and grim, and as blood-thirsty as ever. His ideal hero reverses the old adage, "it is better to be the first at a feast than the last at a fray," for he is never so happy, — be it Allen Quatermain, Umslopgaas, or who he may — as when, standing in "the imminent deadly breach," he slaughters the natives by the score or by the hundred. "Saul has slain his thousands" — but Rider Haggard has slain his ten-thousands — by proxy, and with "the jaw- bone" — no, with the pen — of an ass-assin ! This is a "bloody Englishman" sure enough! He fairly gloats over murder and carnage. With some illusion of pict- uresque stage-setting, amid strange scenes, and with all the heightening of a "stunning" style, he idealizes the work of the typical cattle-shooter and champion pig- sticker of the Kansas City packing-house; only, his hero "gets in his work" — and a big day's work at that — on human beings, or at the very least on terrific lions or monstrous elephants. Three of the latter, his latest "big chief" slays in one night, "just for divarsion's sake, me boy, " — to fill in a wakeful hour or two, when it wasn't a very good night for sleeping — or for elephants either ! Whether this apotheosis of brutal butchery exerts any higher moral influence over the mind of youth than does the deprecated "yellow-covered" dime-novel may be a question. What is the essential difference between this and the "Big Bulldog of the Brazos," the "Red Slayer of Socorro," or "King Richard the Third." Their heroes, be they bandit, bully Briton or king are all alike in their appetite for blood, — and their easy royal manner of butchery. "Fee — Fi — Fo — Finn" — "Off with his head ! — so much for Buckingham ! " As the Lounger has just said of Haggard — there is a good deal of vivid 262 MIDSUMMER MADNESS. picturing and phrasing, — a rush and a "go " of directness about the style that must be quite attractive to almost any boy: — but the brutishness is there all the same. For the Lounger, its quality — and especially its quan- tity — begins to pall. Even the excitement of the terrible conflicts and dangers wears off, when you find that after sacrificing all the poor fellows, that he has driven in to help him, the hero himself always comes out all right in the end. Long years agone, the Lounger suffered a succession of nightmares. Every night, in his dreams, he found himself frantically clutching, with hands and teeth, the lower edge of the roof of an exceedingly tall house, while his body dangled over the abyss below. It was at first decidedly unpleasant. But he continued to dream this same thing so often that at length a continuity was established, bridging over the intervals between; — that is, he came to recollect in his dream of having been through the same thing before ! With this recollection, came even this logic, — "I wasn't killed the last time, or I shouldn't be here now. I think I'll let myself drop ! " He did so, and fell — awake ! Thereafter, that particular nightmare had no terrors for him — and forsook him. So with the terrors of the Rider Haggard school of romantic fiction, (a "rider haggard," by the way, is somewhat suggestive of "night-mare") too much famil- iarity with unlimited bravery, butchery and bugaboos generally, breeds contempt in mature minds. Possibly apprehending this philosophic truth, Haggard now "gives us a rest" — and a change. In his latest craze, "Mr. Meeson's Will," he treats us to a unique variation on the theme in fiction, of shipwreck and subsequent sojourn on a "desert island." The Lounger MIDSUMMER MADNESS. 263 had supposed this theme and its incidents exhausted by- Defoe, Charles Reade and Frank Stockton; but Haggard discounts "Crusoe," "Foul Play," and "The Dusantes. " By one bold stroke he obliterates the "tracks in the sand," breaks Penfold's pearls, and demolishes even the "Ginger Jar." The mean, miserly Meeson — a British publisher — together with the heroine-novelist Miss Augusta Smithers, a boy, and two sailors, find themselves (about the middle of the book) cast alone on the desolate shores of Kergu- elen Land. Meeson, sick and dying, at last repents him of his sins — and especially of his will, which disinherited his nephew Eustace because said young man had chivalrously taken the part of said Augusta, cheated by the rascally publisher out of the proceeds of her novel. He is now most anxious to revoke, and bequeath his two million pounds to Eustace, back in England. Unfortu- nately it proves there is no paper-mill or stationery-store on this desert island, consequently no material to write the Will. With blood for ink, they might have managed, but there is no substitute for paper, — not a rag of linen among the whole party in flannel — the heroine having left her hem-stitched handkerchief behind, which leaves Meeson in despair ! However — "wherever there's a will (to be made) there's a way," — and Augusta, — inspired by a love of justice and a latent love for Eustace as well, — conceives an original idea. The Will can be tattooed on somebody's back, and thus borne back to England ! As no other "Barkis was willin' " to have the Will in, she finally shoulders the responsibility herself, and the sailor Bill — who is an expert in this old-fashioned species of type-writing — tattoos with a fish-bone and cuttle-fish ink a brief but comprehensive will, duly 264 MIDSUMMER 3IADNE8S. attested, on the ivory shoulders of the fair Augusta. That fair back, resplendent in evening toilet, can never now be presented at court; her radiant shoulders Once lovely as a statoo Are now ruined with a tattoo ! This is a new and startling idea in fiction ! Let us trust it will never become popular, nor be carried too far, — no matter even if " there is millions in it ! " Meeson dies appositely soon after, Augusta angelically exclaiming: "Well ! I'm glad that it is over ! Anyway I do hope that I may never be called on to nurse another publisher." The sailors get drunk and drown themselves "out of hand." Augusta is rescued in the nick of time, and finally gets back to England, to bring her fair face — and her back — as a fortune to Eustace. There is natu- rally a big fight in the courts over this unique Will — but Eustace finally succeeds, of course, being so effectually "backed up" by Augusta Smithers. The contestants had employed some twenty eminent lawyers on their side, who made a great deal of legal noise, but after all, being only lawyers and not drummers, they couldn't beat a tattoo ! The Lounger votes that Rider Haggard be entitled to a ward all to himself, — the First Ward, indeed, — in the asylum for midsummer maniacs. MIDSUMMER POETRY. When Matthew Arnold desired to give to one of his propositions the force of an axiom, he was wont to preface it with "I said a long time ago that — ." In his mind, the fact that he had propounded it to the world several years before, effectually barred any possible contrary opinion with a statute of limitations; it fore- closed a mortgage upon the world of letters and ideas, and precluded finally any subsequent equity of redemption to any opposing notion whatever. The egotism of ordinary mortals is apt to be somewhat offensive — but that of Matthew Arnold pertained to so great a mind, and was withal so sublime in its unconscious audacity that we can but wonder and admire ! In humble imitation thereof, the Lounger might say that so long as a year ago, he called the attention of the Journal readers to the fact that literature at this torrid season of the year is apt to be affected with a midsummer madness. The manifestations may be mild in manner and moderate in measure, but — like great wit — they are "to madness close allied." That is, to madness of the midsummer variety, which overcomes the writers "like a summer cloud" — or rather like a July sun when you are abroad without a light cotton umbrella. Last season, the Lounger gave instances where it touched the brains of the prose romancers. Just now, he is inclined to test some of the midsummer poets. 265 266 MIDSUMMER POETRY. Some of these are crazy enough in the early spring-time when they sing madrigals to the birds and grass and flowers. Of the typical poet it may be said, as of Bayard Taylor's " Quaker Widow's" deceased husband, " I think he loved the spring." Some of the poets of the last generation were wont to love the distillery even better. During May and June they have a lucid interval, — but in this month of midsummer, they* break cut of their asylums and rove around among the newspapers and magazines. We know how this is ourselves. If the Lounger — like Mr. Wegg — ever does "drop into poetry" it is always in "Boffin's Bower," and at this very season of the year. Without preface, here goes for the gem of July ! It is a piece of sentiment, unaffected, and direct in its expres- sion. Its title is "Lost Light," and the writer strikes its key-note — its motif — in the first line: " I cannot make her smile come back- That sunshine of her face That used to make this worn earth seem At times so gay a place. The same dear eyes look out at me, The features are the same : But oh ! the smile is out of them, And I must be to blame." Now what the Lounger likes about this stanza — and he likes it exceedingly — is its touching simplicity. There is nothing mystical or metaphysical, involuted or evoluted, about its expression. It is poetry of the good old-fash- ioned sort; you understand just what the writer meant — and it "touches a chord" at once. There's nothing of Browning or the "latter-day poets" about this. So much the better. You can get it into a man's head without a surgical operation, or taking a club — that is, a Browning Club — to him. MIDSUMMER POETRY. 267 Touching, too — though perhaps a trifle tame and prosaic in diction — is the confession embraced in the last line of the stanza. No doubt Edward was to blame ! He intimates, it is true, that he doesn't know just why- — but if he would consult his own conscience closely, it is probable he could determine the why and the wherefore. A sunshine like that doesn't fade out of a good woman's face without reason ! Possibly he had taken to staying out late of nights, — or to chewing tobacco, and has a bad breath in consequence. Possibly — but why speculate ? If Edward really wants to know, he can find out. " Sometimes I see it still: I went With her the other day To meet a long-missed friend, and while We still were on the way, Her confidence in waiting love, Brought back for me to see, That old-time love-light to her eyes That will not shine for me. 1 ' Well now, Edward, you see that smile is not " done- gone" for good, and you, too, could share in it if you should deserve it ! But you recollect that when you were going down hill, on the way home from the station where you had driven her to meet the "long-missed friend," (not "missed" this time, for the train was on time and made a good connection) the faithful old gray horse stumbled, and then you laid on the lash unmerci- fully, and swore at him like a trooper. Just then that smile went out of her face "quicker than wink," and fled like "the light that never was on sea or land." What- ever else you let go of, Edward, keep your temper ! Hold on to that always ! I think you will. " They tell me money waits for me : They say I might have fame. I like these gewgaws quite as well As others like those same." 268 MIDSUMMER POETRY. They tell you "money waits for you!" Beware, Edward ! 'Tis a set-up job. They will play the confi- dence-game on you sure, if you're not on the lookout ! Money isn't waiting for anybody these days. Most people have to work hard for it; even prize-fighters have to fight for it, and if you invest in Wichita town lots, it is you that will have to wait for the money and not the converse ! "They say you might have fame." Well, you might, and then again you might not. "Doubtful things are mighty uncertain." On the whole, perhaps midsummer poetry gives you just as good a chance as any other way. You confess that you "like those gewgaws quite as well" as does the average person, or, as you tersely put it, "as others like those same." By the way, while "those same" strikes one as reminiscent of Bret Harte's "Truth- ful James," is it good enough poetry for July even? If this be allowed to stand, the next fellow will be working the phrase "of the which I am which" into poetry ! But the next stanza is tip-top good poetry. It is direct, — it is forcible, — and the sentiment is well conveyed. The Lounger has no words of criticism or censure for the poet when he invokes — "Come back, dear vanished smile, come back!" Just bring it back yourself, Edward ! it' rests with you, for you were "to blame" in the first place! But now for the conclusion: — " Who wants the earth without its sun? And what has life for me That's worth a thought, if at its price It leaves me robbed of thee." 'Tis a sweet sentiment; but who "wants the earth," anyway ? Yet here's a man that wouldn't be satisfied without "the sun," too! Edward, beware of covetous- ness, — "beware of ambition, by that sin fell the angels ! " MIDSUMMER POETRY. 209 The Lounger will scarce go so far as to suggest that if Edward " cannot make her smile come back" he should go away and never come back himself. On the contrary, if Thomas Moore made a success of it by singing "Her bright smile haunts me still," we dont see why Edward's "Lost Light" may not yet come back, and bring "the light of other days around" him — and us. But he must be more careful in every way, and especially with his poetry. He can write good lines, but he shouldn't allow himself to drop into prose and slang — or phrases that sound very much like it. At one moment, with great felicity, he gets hold of words and phrases most expressive of tender pathos — and the very next, with equal facility he "catches on" to "those same." Thus, what might prove a perfect poem, degenerates into an incongruous medley — almost a burlesque. Henceforth let him haply restrain a propensity to punctuate poetic points with the pen of a punning paragrapher ! sjc =fc s{c ;=< ^c =fc ^c sf; =f: For some good sane verse, though born at home and in midsummer, take Mrs. Allerton's "Fields of Kansas." The prairie landscape in all the luxuriance of this — its most luxuriant — season is here well reproduced in word- painting, from a palette well stored with local color. If to the eye and ear of a stranger, there might seem a little too frequent recurrence of the note of "gold" in the landscape of Mrs. Allerton's verse, he would do well to bear in mind that, at even this season of the year, the gold in the sunset sky of Kansas is as common as its rich color is abundant in her harvest fields. HAND-MADE POETRY. There is an uncommon amount of fairly good poetry on the market now-a-days, considering that we haven't any really great poets "on the hook" in this day and generation, — since that galaxy of great poets that adorned the past era is fast sinking below the horizon. But there is a goodly supply of second-best poetry afloat in the newspapers and magazines, all the while. Not so partic- ularly at this season of the year. The Lounger is not now alluding to poetry of the Midsummer variety, which bubbles and boils and, like the current mercury, comes near bursting out through the top of the thermometer. No. the Lounger hasn't that especially in mind at this moment! Far less, what is called "machine-poetry." That is not worth considering at all. But what he was referring to was good "hand-made" poetry. There never was a time when more of this kind was pro- duced, and it usually is of a very clever sort, indeed. A large number of the rising young literary fellows of the country are working at it, and the product, on the whole, is very creditable. The only question is does it supply a long-felt want? Will it fairly take the place of the old-fashioned sort of poetry? It is indeed, constructed secundum arlem, by scholars and men of talent, who understand all the rules fully as well as did the old masters of the business. All the various forms are employed with great art. Some forms, indeed, are mastered that the old fellows scarce attempted — the 870 HAXD-MADB POETRY 271 A7//<7