i^ :e 516 ■ W82 Copy 1 TT M I o ]n: ANI> s ]^: C E S S I N i\ M I S S I S S I P P I , RY THF, HON. JOHN W. WOOD, The T^nion member of the Mrssissirn State Convention m-iio REFUSED TO 8I(JN THE ORDINANCE OF SECESSION, OR to commit himski-f in any way to thk Secession Movem knt. THE KEDKRAL UNION-IT MOST BE PREoERVED.-Jackso*. MKMPHIS: 8AUND1;R..\ P^HRlSH A M'HirSlOKi:, 1'R1.vii:es, t- PREFACE. The gi'eat object of the writer in publishing- the following pages is, to aid in effecting a re-union in feeling and sentiment between the masses of the people of the United States, for social and commercial advantages, as the only basis of a Union worth preserving. Having argued the questions before the people of Mississippi before secession, and a decision being rendered against me, I simply ask that I may again be heard upon a re-argument of the important issues involved. Whenever the minds of the honest masses of the peoj)le are convinced of their errors, they are always ready to correct them and move in the right direction, however obstinate or perverse may be their rules. Born in the old State of Virginia, in sight of Monticello, my ancestors being large slaveholders, and always a slaveholder myself, the tongue of calumny dare not impugn my motives. Whatever differences of opinion may exist as to the best method of restoring our country to its former prosperous and happy condition, the para- mount consideration of every American citizen should be the integrity of the Government and the Union of the States. Note. — The family of the Author have recently arrived in Memphis, under the protection of .1 flng of trnce, bringing through the manuscript of this publication, which was written in the central County in Mississippi, (Attala,) more than twelve months ago. It is now submitted to the public with but slight alterations. His friends in Mississippi have anticipated its publi- cation lor some time, but it was impossible to get it through sooner with safety. TO 'IHK FKW FAITHFUT. UXIOX MEN OF MISSISSIPPI THE FOLLOWING I'AriES AliK IlK-PRCTFl'LLY JNSCiilBEI). CONTENTS: CHAPTER I. The Condition of our Country Two Years Ago, Contrasted with the Present Condition of the South. CHAPTER II. The Origin of the Boctrine of Secession-Extract from the Speech of Mr. Calhoun, on the Force Bill, in the U. S. Senate, in 1833 -Fallacy of the Doctrine-The State Rights Demo- cratic Party South - The Charleston Convention-Division in the National ^Democratic Party -The Eesult-Meeting of the Mississippi Legislature-Canvass in Mississippi-Cireular to the People. CHAPTER III. The Delusions Practiced upon th« People-Peacable Secession- Extract from Mr. Webster't last Great Speech in the Senate - The Plan of Mr. Yancey " of Precipitating the Cotton States into a Revolution "-Speech of Mr. Yaucey at Montgomery— Foreign Inter- ference in the Event of War -Cotton was King, and would force England or France to Intervene-Mr. Yancey Abroad -His Letters Horae-The Telegraph-The "Reliable Gentleman." CHAPTER IV. The Attempt to Assimilate the Secession Movement to the Revolutionary War-Decla- ration of Grievances-Young Patrick Henry's Spring Up-The Delusion of the Great Superi- ority ot our Southern Soldiers-Direct Trade with Europe-Sharleston, Savannah and New Orleans, to Rival Boston, New York and Philadelphia-Secession of South Carolina-Sudden Decline in Cotton— The Money Market the pulse of a Nation. CHAPTER V. Other DeJusions-Strsng Attachment to the Union among the Old Men- An Incident in the Canvass -Meeting of the Convention of Mississippi-The First and Second Days' Pro- ceedingss— The Secession Ordinance Reported on the Third Day. CHAPTER VI. Speech Delivered in the Mississippi Covention, on the Ordinance of Secession, January eth, 1861. CHAP.TE R VII. Note to the Reporter of the Convention— His Beply— Scene in the Hall of the House of Representatives, on the Passage of the Ordinance ef Secession— Ceremony of Signing — The Ordinance. CHAPTER VIII. Second Session of the Mississippi State Convention — The Question of the Mode of Ratifi_ cation of the Constitution— Report of My Remarks — Letter to Chronicle-^The Constitution Ratified by the Convention— indignation of the People. CHAPTER IX. Southern Democracy- Extract from Speech of 8. S. Prentiss— Political Demagogues- State and County Leaders— County Papers. CHAPTER X. The Co-operation Party— A Confederacy of Fifteen States, including Southern Illinois New Mexico, and South California— Still more Comprehensive Views of the Leaders — Rapa- cious Hunt for Office. CHAPTER XI. Was the Election of Abraham Lincoln and Hannibal Hamlin to the Presidency and Vice Presidency of the United States, a Sufficient Cause for Secession ? —The feeling in South Carolina when the Result of the Election was known— The Effect on the Southern States. CHAPTER XII. The Fanaticism of Secession— Political Parsons — Cautious Politicians Become Great War- riors—The Extortioner. CHAPTER XIII. Webster's Reply to Hayne— The Clearest and Best Refutation of the Bight of Nullifica- tion, or Secession— Extract from Mr. Webster's Great Speech. CHAPTER XIV. The Hypocricy of the Secessionists— The Popular Vote of the Seceded States— The Sentiment Among Southern Women — Dialogue between a Southern Lady and afl EuroUer under the Conscript Law. CHAPTER XV. A Re-union in Feeling among the People of the United States should be the Ardent Desire of every American Patriot. J ^3 UN JON AND SEC.S810N. r: 11 A P T E IJ T . Till' i-omlifio/i of nur eonnfni tiro i/nrrs ti'(hiinees of ]ieaee. ])lentv and ]>ros]iei-ity, were con- stant ly before our eyes. If we i;-lanced at our Westei-n teri'itories, we W(uil(l there I'oholdt he thick-skirted forest tumltlinon the increasing grtnideui* and glory of the United States, with heartfelt emotions of pleasui'e and delig^'t. lie saw a great tamily composed of thirty-four States and nine territories, containing a pojMdation of upwai'ds of thirty millions; of which, more than twenty-five millions were white. Casting his eye along our sea-coast, he s.aw that it eni!)raced an extent of twelve thousand, six hundred and sixty miles. Follow- ing the course of our principal rivers, and estimating their length. lie found ton of them extendinc; twenty thousand miles. Lookin<>; upon the Hurfaee of our live great hikes u]H)n oui'Northern border, he saw an area of ninety thousand square miles. Traciny; ujion the map the radroads in operation, he found twenty-five thousand iiiiles, which cost upwards of one hundred millions of dollars; and among them the longest railroad in the world, ( the Illinois Central,) of seven hundi*ed and eighty-four miles. He found five thousand miles of canals, dug out by those hardy sons of Europe, who had come across the blue Avaters of the broad Atlantic, to seek the protection of our flag, and live in a land of freedom. He was astonished at the annual value of our agricultural productions, which summed up two hundred millions of dollars. He found that the most valuable production was Indian Corn, which yielded annually four hundred millions of bushels. He found the amount of reo-istered and enrolled tonnage was four millions four bun- dred and seven thousand and ten. The amount of capital invested in manufactures was six hundred millions of dollars. The annual amount of our internal trade was six hundred millions of dollars. The annual amount of the products of labor (other than agricul- tural) was fifteen hundred millions of dollars. The value of farms and live stock was five hundred millions of dollars. The surface of our coal fields was one hundred and thirty-eight thous- and and thirty-one square acres; and within our borders Avere eighty thousand schools, five thousand academies, two thousand and thirty-four colleges, and three thousand and eight hundred churches. Contemplate the grandeur, glory, magnificence and resources of such a country. Let us contrast the present condition of our Southern country Avith its prospects tAvo years ago. The sound of the Avoodman's axe is no longer heard in our forests. That weapon of industiy has been dropped for the Aveapon of death. The ])low has been left standing in the furrow of many a poor conscript's field, and his aged father, or poor little, barefooted sister, left to work out Avith the hoe the young corn just peeping from the ground. The clang of the hammer and the hissing of the forge have been hushed. The din of commerce no longer enlivens our cities, and the grass has literally groAvn in the streets of our blockaded ports. The necessaries of life have risen to almost fabulous pj-i- ces; salt from fifty to sixty dollars per sack; cotton <-ards from twelve to fift;c of wl\ieh our Soulhern people arc peculiarly fond, is ordy found in the houses of the wealthiest, and the poorer classes have to suhstitute a de- coction of toasted cornmeal, bran, potatoes, acorns, or such other substitutes as the ingenuity of the oldest dames can devise. De- serted villages are seen in every county. The few remaining merchants hang idly about their stores, with no customers to buy, and no merchandize to sell. The hotels are virtually closed. Man}^ poor families, whom their richer neighbors ha;!. in which lie uses this laiiLi,'iia!.;;c : •■ N this a KeiU'ral I'liioii ov I'liio;! of States, as disl^iiiet tVoni tliat of individuals ': Is the SovL'reiL;,'nt}" in the sevei-al States or in the American people in the ai>;L:,i'e^'ate ''. The very laii^'uai;'e wiiieh we are compel ed to use wlieii y))eakino; of our })oliticai institu- tions, at1t'oi'd;^i proof conclusive as toit.sreal character. The terms TTnioM, Federal, United, all im[ily a eomhination of sovereitcnlies, a (totifi'deratioii of States. They arc nev^-r Jipplied to an associa- tion of individuals. Who ever liL'ard of the United Sta «'s of New York, of M.issacluisetts, or of Vir<:;iiiia; Who ever heard I he. terms Fedei'al or Union ai^plied to the aj;jjregatioii of individuals into one eoiumuuily 't ^or is tlie other point less clear — ^thal the Sovereignty is in tlie several States, and that our system is a Union ot twenty-four Sovereign power.s under u Constitutional i'om])act, and not of a divided Sovereignty bet\Voeii the States sev- erally and tln> United States. Jn spite of all that has been said, I maintain that Sovei'eignty is in its nature indivisible. It is llu" supi'enn> power in a State, and we might just as well speak of half a square or half a triangle as of half a Sovercigr.t .'. It is a gi'eat eri-or tf> confound the exercise of Sovereign powers with Sovereignty itself, or the delegation of such powei's with the sur- render of them. A Sovcu'eign may delegate his powers to be ex- ercised by as many agents as he may think proper, under such conditions or with such limitations as he may impose, but to sui-- render any jiortion of his Sovereignty to another, is to annihilate the whole." The fallacy of the fascinating doctrine containcy foreign interference. Mr. Mcmminger's scheme for raising money by a " Produce Loan" was based upon that presumption. Mr. Yancey had \vritten home that our Ports would be opened prospectively, from time to time, about as often as some of the x^orthern Statesmen had designated the time of the termination of the " rebellion." The most strained efforts were made during the progress of the revolution to keep up this delusion. Tbo telegraph was subsidized to gain its assistance. The " reliable gentleman " had time and again heard a dispatch read at the head-quarters of such a General, that our independence was to bo acknowledged at such a time, and our ports opened. The position I assumed in the canvass before the people of Mississippi was: That we could not reasonably expect any assis- tance from foreign nations; that they were opposed to our pecu- liar institution which underlaid the revolution, and tliat their sympathies Avould be against us; that, however much tiiey might rejoice at the dissensions existing here, and would encourage them to weaken us as a great rival, especially of England and France, the^^ would not take part in the conflict. The Commis- sioners sent to Europe were so well aware of the prejudices of the English people against slavery that Messrs. Yancey, Mann, and Roost, endeavored to place the revolution upon the grounds of the Tariff, and exhibited very great weakness in doing so. Mr. Yancey, in his speech at the Fish-mongers Company dinner, said: "their pursuits, soil, climate and productions are totall}^ different from those of the North. They think it their interest to buy where they can buy cheapest and sell where they can sell dearest. In all this the North differs toto coelo from them^ and now makes war upon us to enforce the supremacy of their mistaken ideas and seltish interests." In a letter subsequently written by these gentlemen to Lord John Russel, the cause of the secession movement is attributed to the Tariff and not to Slavery. In this view of the subject those gentlemen were at least thirty 3'ears beliind the times, and must have had their attention directed to the little nullification move- mtut of South Carolina in ISS'l. Their great weakness, however, 17 S^9 consisted in flattering themselves that Lord John Eussel could be so easily deceived, when he understood, perhaps, a little better than those gentlemen, the true character of the American question. CHAPTEE lY. The attempt to assimilate the Secession movement to the Revolutionary War — Declaration of grievances — Young Patrick Henrys spring up — The delusion of the great sujoeriority of our Southern soldiers — Direct Trade idth Europe — Charleston^ Savannah and New Orleans to rival Boston^ New York and Philadelphia — Secession of South Carolina — Sudden decline in Cotton — The Money Market thep)ulse of a Nation. 3. Long prior to the fall of Fort Sumpter on the 13th of April, 1851, the commencement of actual hostilities, a great effort had been made by the leaders of the secession movement to assimilate the revolution they were about to inaugurate, to the revolution of our ancestors, which established American independence. Our pretended grievances were summed up in imitation of the Decla- ration of Lidependence. Young Patrick Henrys sprung up in every county, and appeals to the patriotism of the people were made which far excelled all the powers of eloquence ever displayed b}^ " the forest-born — Demosthenes." Many young orators, who had never before appeared upon the stump, made such strained efforts, that the hearer was irresistibly reminded of the young- Shanghai rooster, so common in this country, that crows so hard, that he seems to be in imminent danger of crowing himself out of l»s knee joints ! Unfortunately these appeals to the people sent thousands of the brave young men of the South to the field, who never returned to their once happy homes. Instances might be enumerated of many imfortunate poor widoAvs, who thus lost all of their sonsj and were tlu'own upon the cold charities of the rich, for a bare maintenance. Some yoimg ladies were found simple-minded and silly enough to send aprons and dolls to those young men whose circumstances compelled them to remain at home, till forced off C 18 by that terrible engine of militaiy des]")otisni known as the "Con- script Law." An impression was made upon ouryonniij men that nnlcss they took part in tlie revohition, they would be regarded as the Tories of the Revohitionary War. This had a powerful effect upon the brave and impetuous youth of our country. The recollection of the success which had always attended our arms in^all the wars in which we had been engaged — the revolutionary war — the Avar with England of 1812, and the Mexican war — in- spired the belief that we could not engage in any war without success. The masses of the people did not stop to compare the resources of the different sections of the Union; nor pause to re- flect upon the inequality of the conflict into which we were about to be plunged. Many of our 3'oung men are always ready for a flght, and v\dien it is "a free fight" some care but little upon which side they are engaged, so that they are "in." 4. Another great delusion disseminated among our people was, the great superiority of our Southern soldiers to our Northern men. It was often said, that " one Southern man could whip half a dozen Yankees." This opinion had been formed from the ap- pearance of the many delicate clerks and collectors who had been sent out by their houses, drumming and collecting through the South, and who were more frequently met with the pistol and boAvie-knife, than the ready money. It manifested a great ignor- ance of the history of the Northern Nations of Europe for bravery and endurance when compared with the more Southern tribes. This delusion has already been dispelled, especially in regard to the frontier men of the North-west. They seemed to be ignorant of the fact, that in the United States army would be met some of the best men of every civilized nation. It is imdoubtedly true, that for impetuous bravery — the daring charge and dashing onset, the Southern soldier stands unsurpassed before the world; and in a war with any foreign nation, would do prodigies of valor, une- qualled upon the pages of military warfare; but when figltting against the old flag, under which our fathers had fought and bled — endeared to them by all the associations of the past, and hopes of the future — under which Washington, Lafayette, Mont- gomery, Gates, Green, Jackson and Taylor had fought — that waved at King's Mountain, Gilford Court House, Camden, Eutaw, Cow-pens, Moultrie and Yorktown — against brethren of the same race, and often of the same family; whilst the hearts of many of them were never in the cause in which they wei*e enlisted, it is 19 ^ " wonderful timt they displayed the heroism exhibited lit Manassas, Leesburg, Behnont and Shiloh. 5. Direct Trade with Europe, was a favorite theme of indul- £,^ence by the secession leaders. Charleston, Savannah and New Orleans Avere to rival Boston, New York and Philadelphia, We were going to sell everything very Jiigh and buy everything very cheap. Our opponents told us, " we will have direct trade with Europe. Our commerce will flourish; industry will be amply rewarded. Our revenue from imports, instead of going into the treasury as now, to be expended in warring upon us, will be di- verted into the Southern treasury to support our own friendly g-overnment. We will then be relieved of our vassalage to New York, and otherNorthern cities, which now subjects us to a mone- tary panic whenever there is a stringency in the New York money market, which began to be felt before the late Presidential elec- tion. In the present deranged state of the cotton market, we are experiencing the evil effects of this commercial dependence on New York. In our Southern Confederacy we will be free from • all this. In.withdrawing we lose nothiiKj and save all." This de- lusion led many into the snare. Loud expressions were heard of the great value that would attach to land and negroes in the event of secession, and some were heard to say that they would sell their lands and , negroes at half price if Mississippi did not secede; but Mississippi did secede, and instead of land and ne- groes advancing, neither will bring half price even in the rag money currency of the State, and if put up for gold and silvei^ they would not bring one-fourth their usual price. The cities that were to rival the cities of the North have languished every day they have been out of the Union. Instead of selling every- thing very high and buying everything very cheap, we buy every- thing very high and sell everything very cheap; instead of direct trade with Europe, we have had no trade at all. We have no commerce; no revenue from imports; no rewards for our industry- none of the golden promises of the secession leaders have been realized. Immediately after the secession of South Carolina, cot- ton dropped down to six cents, and we were told that it was ow- ing to "a stringency in the New York money market I " Financial men saw th e dark storm that was approachin <-•. That unfailing indication of the condition of a nation, th^ money market— the pulse of a nation— was disturbed; but its disturbance was produced by the secession of South Carolina. We were told 20 that a sudden decline in cotton was produced by a stringency in the New York money market, but avo were not told what produced that stringency. The first manifestation of any disturbance in Eng- land is exhibited by the money market — the decline in Consols. vSo in France, in the decline of theEents — the pulse of the nation rises or falls, in propoi-tion to the healthfulness of the nation ; so it was with the money market of the United States, after the se- cession of South Carolina in December, 1860, CHAPTEE V. Other delusions — Strong attachment to the Union among the old men — • A71 incident in the canvass — Meeting of the Convention of Missis- sippi — The first and second day's proccetZ/w^s — The Secession Ordinance reported on the third day. These delusions and many others — some of which were most preposterous, such as that unless secession succeeded the negroes would be emancipated ard the jjoor Avould have to do the menial services of the slaves — were most artfully, ingeniously and some- times powerfully impressed upon the people. I always found a very strong attachment to the Union among the old men of the State. An incident of the canvass will forcibly illustrate this fact. At a precinct in the county of Attala, known as Crim's Box, where my opponent and myself were to address the "sovereigns" on the day of the Convention Election, I ob- served an unusual number of ver}^ old men, some of whom had fought in the revolutionary war. Seeing a fallen pine near the stand, I requested them all to take their seats together upon the log. In the course of my remarks I took occasion to paint the scenes of the revolution — the struggles of our forefathers — their hardshijxs and sufferings — the character and conduct of Washing- ton and his com-patriots — the principal battles and other remini- sences. When the polls were opened they all went uj) and voted together, and all voted the Union Ticket but one. The Convention of Mississippi assembled at Jackson on Mon- day, January 7th, 1861. I had been requested by several mem- 37, bers of the convention, before the hour of meeting, to call a conservative member to the Chair, in order that an organization as favorable as possible to the Union cause might be effected. This was anticipated however by an ultra Secessionist, who called the Convention to order more than thirty minutes before the usual time for such bodies to convene, and nominated the Hon. li. T. EUett, an ultra member, as temporary Chairman. At the suggestion of the Chairman, Rev. C. K. Marshall, of Yicksburg, opened the Convention with prayer, as follows : "Oh, Almighty God, we come into Thy presence on this occa- sion, so solemn, so freighted with high and holy resolves, humbly and earnestly beseeching Thee to be with us in our councils. Send down Thy spirit that these Thy servants may consummate such measures as shall result in the maintainance and propaga- tion of the principles of self-government. Our Heavenly Father, Thou hast seen the malign influence of our sister States, and Thou hast heard, too, the cry of those who sought Thy guidance. Help our Southern country ; protect her in her rights, and teach these, the people's servants, to carry out Thy law with coolness and dispassionate forgetfulness of self. Help them to bury party animosities, to forget past controversies of party, and go forth in the faithful performance of the high and holy duties which are now their special care. And if the sword of the enemy be drawn against us. Oh, God, be our guide in the bloody contest, and, vic- torious in peace we shall inscribe Thy great name. And now, Heavenly Father, we commend to Thine especial care, the interests of the world at large. Help us to perform our obligations to each other, and may we never have occasion to regret our actions in this cause. Amen." The roll of Counties was then called, the following delegates registering their names: Adams : A. K. Farrar, J. Winchester; Attala: John W.Wood, E.H.Sanders; Amite: D. W. Hurst; Bolivar: Miles H. McGehee; Carroll: W. Booth, J. Z.George; Claiborne: Henry T. Ellett; Coahoma: J.L.Alcorn; Copiah: P. S. Catchings, Ben. King; Clark: S. H. Terrill; Choctaw: W. F.Brantley, AV. H. Witty, J. H. Edwards; Chickasaw: C. B. Baldwin, J. A. Orr; Covington : A. C. Powell; Calhoun: M. D. L. Stephens, W. A. Sumner; DeSoto: J. R. Chalmers, S. D. John- son, Thos. Lewers; Frank'in: D. H. Parker; Green: T. J. Roberts; Hinds: W. P. Harris, W. P. Anderson, W. B. Smart; Holmes: W. L. Keirn, J. M. Dyer; Harrison: D. C. Glenn; Hancock: J. B. 22 Deason; Issaquena: Albert C. Gibson; Itawamba: E. 0. Beene, W. H. Tison, M. C. Curamings, A. B. Bullard; Jasper: O. C. Dease; Jackson: A. E. Lewis; Jefferson: J. S. Johnston; Jones: J. H. Powell; Kemper: O. Y. Neely, Thos. H. Wood; Lawrence: Wm. Gwin; Lowndes: Geo. K. Clayton, W. S. Barry; Leake: W. B. Colbert; Lauderdale: J. B. Eamsay, C. F. Simmes; Lafaj^ette: L. Q. C. Lamar, T. D. Isom; Marshall: J. W. Clapp, Samuel Benton, H. W. Walter, A. M. Clayton, Willis M. Lea; Madison: A. P. Hill; Monroe: S. J. Gholson, F. M. Eogers; Marion: Hamilton Mayson; ]N"oxubee: Israel Welsh; Neshoba: J. L. Backstrow; Newton: M. M. Keith; Octibbeha : T. C. Bookter; Perry : P. J. Myers; Pike: J. M. Nelson; Panola: J. B.Fiser, F. A. McGehee ; Pontatoc: H. E. Miller, E. W. Flournoy, C. D. Fontaine, J. B. Herring; Eankin: J. J. Thornton, W. Denson; Sunflower: E. P. Jones; Simpson: W. J. Douglas; Smith: W. Thompson; Scott: C. W. Taylor; Tallahatchie: A. Patterson; Tishomingo: A. E. Eeynolds, J. A. Blair, T, P. Young, W. W. Bonds; Tunica: Andrew Miller; Tippah: Joel H. Berry, Orlando Davis, D. B. Wright, J. L. Davis; Washington: J. S. Yerger ; Wilkinson: Alfred C. Holt; Wayne: W. J. Eckford; Warren : T. A. Marshall, W. Brooke; Winston: W. S. Boiling. John Kennedy; Yazoo: Henry Vaughan, G. B. AYilkinson; Yalla- busha: W. E. Barksdale, F. M. Aldridge. After some unimportant business, necessar}^ for a permanent organization, L. Q. C. Lamar, of Lafayette, offered the following- resolution which was adopted : Resolved, That a committee of be appointed to prepare and report, as speedily as possible, an Ordinance provid- ing for the withdrawal of the State of Mississippi from the present Federal Union, with a view to the establishment of a new Confederacy, to be composed of the Seceding States. After some discussion the blank in the resolution was filled by inserting fifteen. The President appointed the following gentlemen as such committee: L. Q. C. Lamar, of Lafayette; G. E. Clayton, of Lowndes ; Wiley P. Harris, of Hinds ; S. J. Gholson, of Monroe ; J. L. Alcorn, of Coahoma; H. T.Ellet, of C'aiborne; W. Brooke, of Warren; H. E. Miller, of Pontatoc; John A. Blair, of Tishho- mingo; A. M. Clayton, of Marshall; Alfred Holt, of AVilkinson ; J. Z. George, of Carroll ; E. H. Sanders, of Attala ; Benjamin King, of Copiah ; Orlando Davis, of Tippah. 23 JVIL The proceedings of the second day all indicated very clearly that the secession of Mississippi was already /aiY accompli. Mr. Walter, of Marshall offered the folloAving : Resolved, That the Committee on Constitutional Amendments be instructed to report as soon as practicable, after its appoint- ment, an amendment to the Constitution of this State author- izing it to borrow money for purpose of military defence, and to pledge the faith of the State for the repayment of the loan. "He thought this Convention ought to vote the necessary means for the defence and protection of the State. No one doubted its prompt withdrawal." Mr. Gholson in reply to some remarks about dividing the responsibility with the Legislature, said he didn't come here for that purpose. He held the power of the Convention to be omnipotent, and thought it devolved upon this body to borrow the mon<^y. Mr. Chalmers, of De Soto, moved to strike out the words, " an amendment to the Constitution of this State," and substitute the word " ordinance." Mr. Alcorn, of Coahoma, thought that, if the Convention pro- joosed amending the present Constitution, certain difficulties would thereby be raised. Mr. Hill, of Madison, thought that the Convention sho'ild con- form itself to the fifth section of the Convention-bill — that it did not possess the power to amend the Constitution. That the Convention was called for the specific object of acting upon the provisions of that bill. Mr. Ellett, of Claiborne, remarked, that the amendment offered by the gentleman from De Soto was, of necessity, an amendment to the Constitution. He had no scruples about the power of the Convention to amend the Constitution, in any par- ticular. Mr. Flournoy, of Pontatoc, entirely concerted with the views expressed by gentlemen, that this Convention possessed sover- eign and absolute power to amend, alter or abolish, the present Constitution, as it might see jiroper. Mr. Chalmers insisted on his amendment. Mr. Harris, of Hinds, said he had no doubt of the power of the Convention to deal with the Constitution of the State. It was understood throughout the country, however, that we would not touch it except in points necessary to advance the remedy, to 24 which we are determined to resort, in the present emergency. The proposition which is to effect this Constitution, and contemphites the measures necessary to raise money, should be matured in committee ; when matured, then it would be reported as an ordi- nance of the Convention. Though inclined, at first not to vote for the resolution, because he thought money would be raised by taxation in the first instance, he was disposed to remove all obstacles in the wa}^ of every resource at our command. He would, therefore, vote for the orio-inal resolution — not deeming the difference between the mover and the gentleman from Pontatoc verv material. Mr. Clayton, of Marshall, spoke to the question. Mr. Clayton, of Lowndes, held that the Constitution was obligatory upon this Convention until it is altered in the manner provided by the instrument itself. If we proceed, by an ordinance, to pledge the State to raise the necessary means, it would be in direct violation of the organic law. The Constitu- tion should be changed, so as to enable us to pledge the faith of the State legally. Mr. Alcorn was prepared to go with him who goes farthest to realize money for the defence of the State. The Constitution pointed out the mode in which it should be amended — submitted to and voted upon by the people. He held, however, that this Convention has plenary power — that its ordinances were above the Constitution — that we must stand above it; or, if we under- take to be governed by it, then we must stand by it in all its details. He had no hesitation to vote upon an ordinance to place the State on a loar footing. Mr. Welsh, of Noxubee, thought this Convention possessed the power to amend the Coustitution. Here are the people ? ' He was in favor of the original resolution. Mr. Hill, of Madison, explained his position. He would vote for the amendment offered by the gentleman from De Soto. He didn't think this Convention was sovereign in every respect, or had illimitable power over the existing Constitution. He was prepared to vote for any measures looking toward the vindication of the sovereignty of the State. Mr. Glenn said he felt somewhat sensitive as to any difference among the members on any important matter. He was ready to 3'ield, for the sake of harmony. He could not a.q-ree with the gentleman from Madison, nor yet with the gentleman from J.0 ^ys Coahoma; but he would concede to either, an he believed both looked to the prompt loitlidravxil of Mississippi, from the Union. [Loud applause from the galleries, when the President remarked, that he would not tolerate any further demonstrations in that quarter. Mr. Fontaine, of Pontatoc, spoke to the question. Mr. Benton, of Marshall, Avas in favor of the original resolu- tion. The amendment of his honorable friend from De Soto, if passed, would virtually be an amendment of .the Constitution.'^ He thought it better, therefore, to make au amendment in terms. He entertained no doubt of the power of the Convention to amend the Constitution, but thought the exercise of tlmt power should be coufiued to matters coming within the perview of the general object for which the Convention was called. He thought the matter of arming the State came full}'' within that object. Mr. Welsh, of Noxubee, raised a point of order. Mr. Wright, of Tippah, said the delegates to this Convention were fresh from the people, and they knew the wants of their constituency, and he believed it was the duty of this body to pre- pare, by arming, the State for any emergency, in defence of her rights. He preferred the amendment of the gentleman from Dc Soto. The amendment, on a call of the Convention, was lost, and the original resolution was adopted. The President read a telegraphic dispatch from Georgia, announcing that there was no doubt of the immediate secession of that State. The reading of this dispatch created great excitement, when the President called the galleries to order, stating that the galleries would be cleared if order was not observed. Mr. Glenn reported himself as having participated in the expression of exultation. [Laughter, — the ladies in the gallerj^ looking smilingly in the direction of Mr. Glenn.] Mr. Gholson moved to adjourn till to-morrow morning, to allow the Committee on Ordinance time to report. Mr. Harris, of Hinds, arose' to explain, that there Avas no dif- ference in the Committee on the main point, and he thought they would be prepared to report to-morrow^ morning. Mr. Gholson then, at 12 o'clock, renewed his motion to adjourn till to-morrow morning at 10 o'clock, which was cainued. On the third day of the Con- ention, Mr. Lamar, Chairman of D 26 the Committee to draft Ordinance of Secession, said the Commit- tee was ready to report. At 11 h o'clock, a. m., the Convention went into secret session, to consider the report, and remained in secret session till half past 4 o'clock, p. m., greatly to the disap- pointment of the assembled multitude. Never before had such a large assembly of the people of Mississippi been seen at Jackson. All the leading Secessionists of the State, many of them bringing their wives and daughters, had congregated at the Capitol, not ^that they doubted the passage of the Ordinance of Secession, but to see it " well done." Companies of infantry, cavalry and artil- lery, made an unusual display for those "piping times of peace." The sound of the fife and drum was heard in every direction ; the hotels were crowded to overflowing; the bars did an extremely flourishing business. Notwithstanding the unfavora- ble indications, and outside pressure, I determined to make a last eftort for the old Flag, more as a protest than with the hope of defeatingthe passage of the ordinance, by a speech before the Con- vention, which I will submit to the reader as apart of the history of the times. CHAPTBE VI. Speech Delivered in the Mississippi Convention on the Ordinance of Secession, January 9th, 1861. " Mr. President : Napoleon I. nor Garabaldi could never suc- cessfully carry out a revolution, unless the hearts of the people Avere in such revolution. I have strong convictions, Sir, that the hearts of the people of Mississippi are not in this revolution. I know that the hearts of my constituents are not, and I shall represent their will upon this floor, if I stand alone in my posi- tion. "We have been hastily called from among the people, while the excitement of a presidential election has not yet subsided. This excitement will subside, and'I am apprehensive that the ver- dict ot the people, upon calm reflection, will be against hastily and rashly tearing down the fairest fabric of Freedom ever erected in the civilized world. " I have given a calm and patient investigation to the important subject under consideration. I have consulted the Apostles of z< S7/^ our Government, besought the Author of "Wisdom for counsel; laid aside all other considerations but the welfare of the people of the South, and only desired to be right. I have no political aspi- rations to advance, or ambitious designs to gratify. Born in the ' Old Dominion' — my ancestors being large slave-holders, and always a slave-holder myself — my family all native Mississippians, I challenge any member of this body for greater devotion to the true interests of the South. " Mr President: The old ship of State has stood many severe storms. As early as 1790, a storm of great danger blew over the decks of the old Yessel, arising from a question now almost forgotten — the permanent location of the Capitol. Madison and Ames feared then she would go down, but she weathered it. Again, in 1820, another storm arose in the West, and shook the old Vessel to her centre ; but she bravely rode out of it in safety. "Again, in 1832, when one of the Stars, in our constellation of States, attempted ' to fly madly from its sphere,' another storm arose, out of a question not connected with slavery, which seemed for a time to portend inevitable destruction; but she survived that. And still again, in 1850, within the recollection of most of us here, clouds and darkness gathered around her, and some, even then, were for deserting her and giving themselves to the winds and waves; but she rode out of that storm. And now, again, we find the Old Ship enveloped in the blackness of dark- ness. Shall we desert her? Others, or all, may do as they please ; but as for myself, I shall stand upon the Old Ship as long- as there is a plank upon her decks, or an inch of canvass fluttering in the breeze. "Mr. President: Your ears have been lulled by the cry of peaceable secession ; but. Sir, there is no such thing as peaceable secession. It is revolution that you are inaugurating — a revolu- tion that may not terminate before the heel of some military despot is placed upon the necks of the people. Peaceable secesr sion ! Sir, if ever the sun of this Union goes down, it will sink beneath the horizon bathed in the blood of thousands and tens of thousands of the best men of our country. This day, which has been ushered in with so much enthusiasm, by the assembled thousands here, I fear, will prove the darkest day that ever broke upon the State. Let us pause and reflect, before we plunge into the dark abyss now opening at our feet. Let us carefully con- sider the consequences that will surely follow the passage of the 28 Ordinance of Secession. We £;-o off to ourselves, without an arm}^, without a nav}', witliout a single vessel, and without any means of constructing- a navy, even if one could be built in a day with the proper resources. We assume the responsibilities of a new government at a time when our State Treasury is bankrupt, and when the State herself cannot possibly borrow a dollar in the money markets of the world. When our State has neither money nor credit, how is she to carry on an independent government, either by hersef or with the few States that are expected to go with her ? Only by Taxation. And, Sir, although the people may rest satisfied for a while, under the novelty of the ncAV order of things, when you lay the iron hand of taxation upon them, and the millions of dollars in hard cash are wrung from the tax-paj^ers, by the tax-collectors, a voice of indignation will rise in thunder tones from the masses of the people, which will shake the highest seats of the rulers of the coniemplated Confederacy. Arms and munitions of war must be provided, and large bodies of men equipped for militar}^ service. The extensive military prepara- tions now making, and the organizations of companies now going on, show, conclusively, that those who are urging this revolution onward, do not expect it to be peaceable. They smell the battle afar off, and are marshaling their forces. Complicated ques- tions of boundaries ; of the right to navigate the Mississippi river and its numerous tributaries ; of duties on imports, exports, and many other equally difficult and perplexing questions, would soon rob secession of its peaceable coaracter, and light up the flames of civil w^ar. And what right have we to expect that the Govern- ment of the United States Avill peaceabl}" permit its own dissolu- tion ? " We have heard much said about the right of secession — of the Constitutional right of secession — but. Sir, there is no such right. There is not a single word in the Constitution of the United States that recognizes, or can be construed to recognize, the right of secession. Mr. Calhoun claimed the right from facts outside the Constitution, and in contradiction of a fact stated in its preamble. 'We, the people of the United States,' made the Constitution; but Mr. Calhoun says: No, — the people did not make it, the States made it. Mr. Calhoun admitted that if the Constitution had, in truth, been made as its preamble recites, by the people, or, in other words, by the whole nation, then there would not be a pretense for the right of secession. An issue of 29 iJS' fact is thus raised between tlie Constitution of the United States and Mr. Calhoun. Mr. Calhoun claims that, because the people of the several States, through their Conventions, ratified the Constitution, it was a creation and ratification by States ; but the whole people created and ratified it, in the only way they could, He claimed the Government of the United St,ates to be a Confed- eracy of States, each having the right, incident, as he said, to all Confedei'acies, of seceding when she pleases. His conclusion would not follow his premises, even if they were true; but they are not true. He compared the Union to a partnership of unde- fined duration between individuals, from which each has a right to withdraw at pleasure; but the cases are not analogous. The Constitution is the great act of incorporation, binding the States., as corporate entities, in a perpetual Union, and their citizens into one common indissoluble nationality. It is like an indissoluble act of incorporation, from which no stockholder has a right to withdraw his funds. It is an agreement between the citizens of the States to fuze themselves into an indissoluble nationalit}^, like that of Aragon and Castile, or England and Scotland. The right of secession is a mere abstraction, about as reasonable as the right of a part owner of a boat to destroy his part. This whole doctrine of Mr. Calhoun is a fallacj^, a heresy, a delusion, never to be practically realized, and only to tcminate in a bloody revo- lution. This, Sir, is not the only delusion resting upon this body. We have been taught to believe that ' Cotton is King,' and that England and Prance will be forced to intervene in our behalf. I fear, Sir, that this is a delusion, I have no confidence in foreign aid. The sympathies, not only of France and England, but of the civilized world will be against us. They are opposed to the institution which underlies this revolution. The great danger is, if our cotton is withheld to force them to our assistance, that when we may again off'er it to them, they will tell us they do not want it; that they have made other arrangements. It may cause them a temporary inconvenience, but their gratification at the dissentions in our republic, with the hope of an extinction of slavery, will rather induce them to forego that inconvenience, than to intervene in our favor. We cannot control the commerce of the world. It will seek its wants and necessities in other climes and other countries. " Mr. President: I do not intend to discuss this important subject further. You and I, and all the memliers present, have 30 alread}- fully discussed, before the people, all of the points involved. Lot me only warn you and this Convention, that if Secession is carried out, there will be nothing but ruin and deso- lation follow in its course — war, war, inevitable war, the deprecia- tion of every species of property, stop laws, and bankrupt laws, the neglect of agricultural pursuits, the collection of large bodies of troops, the diseases which will necessarily spread among them ; and before the last act in the great drama is closed, not only war, but ' war, pestilence and famine' will spread over the land a scene of devastation, desolation and destruction. "The last words I have to say are, that posterity will hold you. Sir, and this Convention, responsible for the act which you this day commit." CHAPTEE VII. Wote to the Reporter of the Conventmi — His Reply — Scene in the Hall of the House of Representatives on the passage of the Ordi. nance of Secession — Ceremony of Signing — The Ordinance. Seeing that the Convention had made up their minds to pass the Secession Ordinance I determined to take no further j)art in their proceedings, although I remained at the Capitol for ten days after the passage of the Ordinance. After my return home, I ad- dressed a note to Mr. J. L. Power, the Reporter of the Conven- tion, requesting the publication of my speech, as a part of the proceedings, in order that my protest might go to the public, Avith the proceedings of the Convention, and received from him the following reply : "Jackson, Miss., February 14th, 1861. " Hon. John W. Wood — Dear Sir : " Your esteemed favor is at hand. You may send me the speech, though I an not certain as to the propriet}^ of publishing it. The members will recognize it as being delivered in secret session. However, I will consult with proper persons as to the propriety, as one or two other speeches delivered in secret session are in my possession. At any rate, I should be pleased to have the speech. I have, by resolution of 31 S-yc the Convention, the exclusive right, for five years, of publishing the proceedings, (except 20,000 copies by State printer), and if I cannot use your speech in my first edition, 1 sliall in the next. Make it as brief as the arguments will admit. Eespectfully, J. L. POWEE." My speech was never published. The passage of the Ordi- nance was announced by the roar of artillery. The old Flag, which had been so long in the Capitol, was taken down, and a new one, with one star, placed in its stead, amid the shouts of the multitude and applause of the members. The scene in the Hall of the House of Representatives can be better imagined than described. "On motion, the President was requested to have the Ordi- nance of Secession written on parchment, and appropriately arranged for the signatures of the members; also, to telegraph the result of this day's proceedings to the Mississippi delegation in Congress, and to the different slave-holding States.- At this point, Mr. C. R. Dickson entered the hall, bearing a beautiful silk banner, Avith a single star in the center, which he handed to the President of the Convention, as a pi'esent from Mrs. H. H. Smyth, of Jackson. The President remarked, that it was the first ban- ner unfurled in the young Republic, when the members saluted it by rising — the vast audience present uniting in shouts of ajjplause." The ceremony of signing the Ordinance took place on Tues- day, January 15th, the 8th day of the session, in presence of the Governor, Senate and House of Representatives, in j)ursuance of the following resolution : " On motion of Mr. Clayton, of Marshall. Resolved^ That when the Convention proceeds to sign the Ordinance of Secession, it be first signed by the President, and attested by the Secretary of the Convention ; that the counties be then called in^lphabetical order, and that the delegates affix their signatures in the order in which their counties and their own names are called. " Resolved, also, That the Governor of this State, and the Senate and House of Representatives, be invited to be j^resent at the time the same is signed." I was urged by many old friends, some of whom had held high positions in the United States Government, to sign the Ordinance, for the sake of unanimity. Indeed, I was told that it was " a second Declaration of Independence," and that my name should 9.'}. he upon it, to hand down to my children. My reply was, that 1 would not sign what mj'- conscience and judgment did not approve; and that I would rather hand down to my children the remembrance of the fact that I was the member of the Missis- sippi State Convention who refused to sign the Ordinance of Secession. The Ordinance was carefully wa-itten on parchment, beautifully framed, and conspicuously hung in the Capitol. In a few days it might be seen in all the hotels, stores, shops, and other public places; even sold upon the streets, and soon became circulated throughout the State. The following is the Ordinance : "AN OEDINANCE " To Dissolve the Union between the State of Mississippi and other States united with her under the compact entitled, ' The Constitu- tion of -the United States of America.' " The people of the State of Mississippi, in Convention assem- bled, do ordain and declare, and it is hereby ordained and declared, as follows, to-wit : Section 1st. That all the laws and ordinances by which the said State of Mississijjpi became a member of the Federal Union of the United States of America be, and the same are hereby, repealed; and that all obligations on the part of the said State, or the people thereof, to observe the same, be withdrawn, and that the said State doth hereby resume all the rights, functions and powers, which, by any of said laws or ordinances, wore conveyed to the Government of the said United States ; and is absolved from all the obligations, restraints and duties, incurred to the said Federal Union, and shall from henceforth be a free and inde- pendent State. % " Sec. 2. That so much of the first section of the seventh article of the Constitution of this State, as requires members of the Legislature, and all officers executive and judicial, to take an oath or affirmation to support the Constitution of the United State, be, and the same is, hereby abrogated and annulled. " Sec. 3. That all rights acquired and vested under the Consti- tution of the United States, or under acts of Congress passed, or treaty made, in ]jursuanee thereof, or under any law of this State, and not incompatible with this Ordinance, shall remain in form sv^ and have the same effect as if this Ordinance had not been passed. " Sec. 4. That the peoj)ie oC the State of Mississippi hereby consent to form a Federal CJnion with such of the States as may have seceded, or may secede from the Union of the United States of America, upon the basis of the present Constitution of the said United States, except such parts thereof as embrace other portions than such.secediiig States. " Thus ordained and dechired in Convention, the 9th day of January, in the year of oar Lord One Thousand Eight Hundred and Sixtv-one. WILLIAM S. BAEEY, President. F. A. Pope, Secretary. ^' In Testimony of the passage of wliich, and the determination of the members of the Convention to uphold and maintain the State in the position she has assumed by said Ordinance, it is signed by the President and membei-s of this Convention, this the fifteenth day of January, A. D. 1861. A. K. Farrar, J. Winchester, E. II. Sanders, D. W. Hurst, Miles H. McGehee, J. Z. George, W. Booth,' Henry T. Ellett, J. L. Alcorn, P. S. Catchings, Ben. King, S. H. Terrill, W. F. Brantley, W. H. Witty, J. H. Edwards, J. A. Orr, (J. B. Baldwin, A. C. Powell, Yv^. A. Sumner, M. D.L. Stephens, J. R. Chalmers, S. D. Johnson, Thos. Lewers, ]). H. Parker, T. J. Eobcrts, W. P. Harris, W. P. Anderson, W. B. Smart J. M. Dyer, W. L. Keirn, J). C. Glenn, J. B. Deason, Albert C. Gibson, R. O. Beeue, A. B. Ballard, M. H. Tison, M. C. Cummings, O. C. Dease, A. E. Lewis, J. S. Johnston, J. H. Powell, Thos. H. Wood, Wm. Gwin, Geo. K. Clayton, W. B. Colbert, J. B. Eamsay, F. C. Simmes, L. Q. C. Lamar, T. H. Isom, A. M. Clayton, J. W. Clapp, Samuel Benton, W. H. Walter, Willis M. Lea, A. P. Hill, S. J. Gholson, J^\ M. Rogers, Hamilton May son, Israel "W'clsh J. L. Backstrom, M. M. Keith, T. C. Bookter, P. J. Mvers, J. M. ]Nelson, E J. B. Fiser, F. A. McGehee, C. I). Fontaine, J. B. Herring, IL' R. Miller, R. TV". Flourno}'', W. Denson, E. P. Jones, W. J. Douglas, W. Thompson, C. W. Taylor, A. Patterson, A. E. Reynolds, W. W. Bonds, T. P.Young, J. A. Blair, Andrew Miller, Orlando Davis, Joel H. Berrj^, J. L. Davis, D. B. Wright, J. S. Yergei-, Alfred C. Holt, W.J. Eckford, W. Brooke, T. A. Marshall, John Kennedy, W. S. Boiling, F. M. Aldridge, W. R. Barksdale, Henry Yaughan. G. B. Wilkinson." * \ C II A P T E E VIII. Second Session of the Mississippi State Convention — The question of the mode of ratification of the Constitution — Report of my remarks — Letter to " Chronicle" — The Constitution ratified 'Vy the Conven- tion — Indignation of the people. On the 12tli of March, 1861, the Congress of the Confederate States adopted a Permanent Constitution, which was submitted to the Convention of the States for ratification. The President of the Mississippi Convention called that body together for that purpose, on the 25th of March, 1861. A question of much importance arose in the Convention as to the mode of ratification, whether by the Convention or directly by the people. JSTot believing that the hearts of the masses of the people of Mississippi were ever in the Secession movement, about three months having elapsed since the election, I doubted whether the people of the State would ever ratify a Constitution containing the objectionable features of the instrument made at Montgomery. Believing too, that it was not the province of the Convention, which had been elected for an entirely different pur- pose, to pass upon the ratification or rejection of the Constitution, I determined to take a stand in favor of ratification directly by the people and present an Ordinance for that purpose. A meagre report of my remarks upon the subjuct appeared in the proceed- ings of Tuesday, March 26th, 1861, as follows: " Mr. Wood, of Attala, addressed the Convention at length on the Ordinance, which he gave notice before the adjournment of the morning session, he would offer. He cited the action of the Convention of 1851, and quoted the following from the report of the Committee of that body composed of Messrs. W. E. Cannon, Samuel N. Grilliland and W. P. Harris, in supj^ort of the duty of referring this matter to the people. " They hold it to be their duty to submit the action of the Convention to the people of the State. An ordinary degree of respect for the peo^^le would seem to call for such a course, justice and fair dealing towards our constituents demand it. We are holding and excercising the sovereignty of the State. Our opin- ions, our acts, become the sovericgn will of the people. It is an universal rule — one never hitherto violated in the practice of any State in the Union — that such should be submitted to the j^eople for their judgment. In ordinary legislative action, no such neces- ^7i 35 / sity exists as the same power which makes, can repeal laws. But when the sovereignty of the State has acted it can never be changed without calling into action again the powers of the peo- ple through an organized form. Hence the palpable necessity that their opinion should be had, before any supreme rule of action any law, any great ]brinciple should be enforced upon them. Dis- trust of the popular will does not become a popular representa- tive ; and we have ever held that system of government the wisest which most frequentlj^ seeks an expression of the popular will." " Two of these distinguished men, who submitted that report, had gone to their long rest ; one of them was on this floor, and he hoped to hear him advocating now a policy which he ap- proved in 1851. Mr. Wood also cited Gen. Quitman in support of this principle. In his address to the "Democratic State Eights' party of Mississippi," at that period, on retiring from further con- test for gubernatorial honor, Gen. Quitman said : " It is true that the State has not yet spoken authoritatively; even the acts of the Conventmi will not be binding until they shall have been ratified by a vote of the people. "Mr. Wood assailed many of the ^propositions enunciated by the gentleman from Harrison. The greatest work, said he, that could be submitted to man is the building up of a good govern- ment. You are now trying a second experiment. JSTo spot on the face of the earth now affords evidence of the perpetuity of the republican system ; and he stated as his humble conviction that unless a course is adopted that will fasten the new govern- ment in the affections of the people, it would be of short duration. He thought that the delegates to Montgomery should be the first to desire their actions should be submitted to the people for ratifi- cation. There was no pressing necessity for the Constitution to be hastily ratified by this Convention. The very faefthat this is a debatable question, proves that it should be submitted to the people. As a naked question, he believed that tliis Convention had the power, without the right — the power that the despot v\'ould exercise. He quoted from the message of Gov. Pettus, convening the extra session of the Legislature, in November last, for the purpose of calling a Convention. " Embodied in the reserved rights of the States, is the soul of American liberty — the great saving principle to which alone the Southern States can look and live. This saving principle must OO perish under Black Republican rule Then go down into Egypt while Herod reigns in Judea; it is the onl}^ means of saving the life of this Emanuel of American polities, and when, in after years, it shall be told you, that they who sought the life of this Prince of Peace and fraternity, are dead, you may come up out of Egypt, and realize all the fond hopes of patriots and sages, of peace on earth and good will among men, under the benign influ- ence of a re-united Government, deriving its just poioei'S from the con- sent of the governed. " It is dangei'ous to alienate the affections of the people from this Government. Great is the power of this Convention, but greater, by far greater, is the power of the people. If we are unwilling to submit the Constitution to the peo- ple, they will ratify it. How easy for the Legislature to call another Convention. He saw no force in the argument that, because Commissioners desire to go to European governments under the auspices of a Permanent Government, we should deprive the peojDle of their right to act upon the organic law. Those governments are aware that a separation has taken place — that this is the cotton region; and if they are disposed to treat with us, we have now a strong Provisional Government, which he regarded as more efficient than the government contemplated by the Permanent Constitution. " Mr. Wood submitted the following ordinance : "AlSr OEDI NANCE " To Provide for Submitting the Permanent Conetitution of the Confed- erate States of America to the People of the State of Mississippi.. "Section 1. Be it ordained by the people of Mississippi, in Convention assembled, that the Permanent Constitution of the Confederate States, adopted b}^ the Provisional Congress, at Montgomery, on the day of ISGl, shall be submitted to the qualified voters of Mississippi, for their ratification or rejec- tion. " Sec. 2. That for this purpose an election shall be held at the diiferent election precincts throughout the State, on the day of 1861, which election shall be held and conducted in all respects, and the returns thereof be made in the same manner, as now provided bylaw for the election of members of the Legis- lature. " Sec. 3. That the said Constitution and Ordinance be pub- lishcd in the Mississippian, at least thirty days prior to tlie date of said election. " Sec. 4. That at least thirty days prior to the day of 1861, the Governor of this State shall issue his procla- mation for holding said election. " Sec. 5. That, at said election, the electors shall endorse on their ballots, ' Constitution accepted,' or 'Constitution rejected;' and if, from the returns made, it shall aj)pear that a majority, of the qualified voters, of the State have accepted the Constitution, then the Grovernor shall issue his proclamation, declaring the fact, and shall notify the President of the Confederate States, that said Constitution has been ratified by the people of the State of Mis- sissippi; and, in case of rejection, then the Governor shall imme- diately notify the President of this Convention of the fact, and the President shall call together this Convention, at as early a day as practicahle, with the view of determining upon the best course of action for the future welfare of the State. " Sec. 6. All ordinances, or parts of ordinances, of this Con- vention, conflicting with this Ordinance, are hereby repealed." Conspicuous among the advocates for a ratification hy the Convention, were the delegates to the Montgomery Convention, including the President of the State Convention. The debate was marked with a degree of ability and interest far exceeding any other debate in the Convention. The influence of outsiders was brought to bear very heavily upon the result. I had very little hope of the passage of my Ordinance, as will ajDpear by the following letter addressed to the editors of the " Chronicle," and pdblished in its issue of March 29th, 1861, which had been the organ of the Union party of my county. " Hall op the House op Eepresentatives, ") "Jackson, March 27, 1861. | " Editors Chronicle : " The Convention has taken no decisive action upon an^^ sub- ject of importance. The question whether the Permanent Con- stitution shall be ratified by the Convention, or submitted to a direct vote of the people, absorbs all other questions. You will observe, from the proceedings of yesterday, that the question now stands before the Convention upon the report of the Com- mittee to ratify by the Convention, and my ordinance offered, as a substitute, leaving the question to a direct vote of the people, at the ballot-box. Yerger and Clayton's Ordinances, which you 38 will find in the first da3^'s proceedings, were rejected, and I am apprehensive that mine will share the same fate, though the vote on mine will be close. A powerful outside influence is being brought to bear on ratifj'ing by this Convention. The truth is, many of them are afraid the peop'e will reject the proposed Con- stitution. " It is hard to work against a dead majority, but I have some hopes of getting my ordinance passed. Should the majority of the Convention deny to the people the right to say under what kind of a Constitution they are to live, it will raise a shout of indignation from the JVlississippi river to the Alabama line, and from the Grulf to Tennessee, which will shake the pillars of the Confederacy to its center, if not cause it to tumble into dust, while many of its aspiring leaders and demagogues will sink beneath the ruins of the fallen temple. The people have the right to say under what kind of government they will live, and no set of politicians have the right to deny them that privilege. Thisis really a contest between the politicians and the people. One or the other must rule, and as the politicians have the sway at present, I think they would move heaven and earth, if possible, to hold on to it. The Convention will possibly continue in session until Saturday, though many of the members are very anxious to get through earlier. Should we remain longer than this week, I will write you more fully. Very respectfully, JOHN W. WOOD." I am thus particular in alluding to the proceedings of the Con- vention upon this subject, as it evidences the fact of the great distrust of the people, on the part of the Convention. Ever since the commencement of the Secession movement, a manifest dispo- sition has been exhibited to hastily seize the reigns of power, and never to let them loose again. My ordinance was rejected, as I anticipated. The vote being 23 to 56 — See Journal of March Session, page 34. The Constitu- tion was then ratified by the Convention, only seven of us finally voting against it. A feeling of great indignation was manifested, in some parts of the State, in consequence of this flagrant outrage upon the rights of the people; but the tocsin of war had been sounded, and a military enthusiasm enkindled, which soon sup- pressed all exhibitions of feeling, save a loyalty to Jeft'. Davis and the Southern Confederacy. 39 S^O CHAPTEE IX. Southern Democracy — Extract from the Speech of S. S. Prentiss — Political Demagogues — State and County Leaders — County pajyers. I have heretofore made some alhisions to the influence of Southern Democracy in causing the calamities which have befallen our country. The subject deserves a more particular notice. Thirty-four years ago S. S. Prentiss predicted what would be the result of the course pursued by that party. In a. speech, delivered at a public dinner in Vicksburg, in the Fall of 1838, Mr. Prentiss said : " Southern Democracy, it seems, consists in general abuse of the rest of the Union, a denial of the existence of any cominon interest with the North, and a bitter denunciation of every man who has the independence to refuse assent to these strange dogmas. Indeed, to such an extent is this brotherly hatred now carried by some, that a man cannot exchange ordinary courtesies, or civilities, with his fellow-citizens of the North, without render- ing himself obnoxious to the charge of being an enemy to the South. I had occasion, myself, to ti'avel North, a few months since, on private business. I was treated with great kindness and hospitality — a kindness and hospitality intended entirely as an expression of good feeling towards the State which I repi*esented. Yet have I been most bitterly abused for responding to these courtesies; for daring to break bread, and eat salt, with our Northern brethren ; and especially for so far violating Southern policy as to have wickedly visited the cradle of Liberty, and most sacrilegiously entered old Faneuil Hall. "I could pity %hese foolish men, whose patriotism consists in treating everything beyond the limited horizon of their own narrow minds, but contempt and scorn will not allow of the more amiable sentiment. It is said against me, that I have Northern feelings. Well, so I have, and Southern, Eastern and Western, and trust that I shall ever, as a citizen of the Eepublic, have liberty enough to embrace within the scope of my feelings, both its cardinal points and its cardinal interests. I do not accuse those who differ with me, of a desire to disolvethe Union, I know among them as honest and honorable men as belong to any party; but 1 do most seriously believe that the Union cannot long survive such kind of argument and feeling as that to which I have alluded. Indeed, 40 if such sentiments are well founded, it ought not to continue ; its objects and uses have ceased. Still, I do most fervently praj that such a catastrophe may be averted ; at least, that my eyes may not witness a division of this Eepublic. Though it may be a day of rejoicing for the demagogue, it will prove a bitter hour for the good man, and the patriot. Sir, there are some things belonging to this Union, which you cannot divide; you cannot divide its glorious history ; the recollections of Lexington and Bunker Hill ; you cannot divide the bones of your Revolutionary sires ; they would not lie still away from the ancient battle grounds where they have so long slumbered. And the portrait of the Father of his Country, which hangs in the Capitol; how much of it will fall to your share, when both that country and picture shall be dismembered?" Ever since the time when that purely patriotic citizen of Missis- si])pi, whose bright genius has cast a halo of glorj^ over the State, warned those " foolish men" of the awful consequences of their madness and folly, the political demagogue, under the gnise of Democracy, who has been the loudest in his denunciation and vituperation of every person and thing north of Mason and Dixon's line, has been seen to receive the most rapturous applause of the people. Some of these reptiles have thus crawled up to the apices of the topmost pyramids in the State. A very few individuals are often enabled to control the people of a State. The leaders about the Capitol keej) the county leaders "posted," and they have been in the habit of haranguing the people upon Court days, at Barbecues, and upon such other occasions as the " dear people" can be conv^iiently assembled together. The County papers have been anomer very efficient means of diffusing the principles of the glorious Southern Democracy. A Democratic County paper has been considered as an "institution" as necessary to the prosperity of one our towns as a hotel or retail grocery. Among the many misfortunes that have befallen our -country, it is some little consolation to know that we have been deprived of the means of publishing these pests to the public welfare. When the pitiless storm of misfor- tune, which has burst with all its fury upon our devoted country, drenching our land with grief and sorrow, shall have passed over us, it is to be hoped that we shall live in a purer political atmos- phere, free from the corrupting influence of political demagogues 41 ^^^ and partisan papers, whoso chief aim, for years, seems to have been to undermine and destroy the best government upon earth. CHxVPTEE X. The Co-operation fcirtif—A Confederacy of Ffteen States including Southern Illinois, New Mexico and South California. — Still more comprehensive views of the leaders — Rapacious liunt for office. The leaders of the Secession part}^, well knowing the strong- attachment to the Union of their Fathers, among the people, and the horror with which they had viewed the monster Disunion, devised a scheme of breaking the subject more softly to their ears, by establishing a co-operation party. They professed to be violently opposed to separate State Secession, although their great leader, Mr. Yancey, had boldly announced the doctrine at Mont- gomery. They were for having a great Southern Confederacy of fifteen States; and many earnestlj'' contended that Southern Illinois would join the list. New Mexico and Southern California would surely follow, and an empire was to be established, which our Statesmen delighted to compare, in extent, with combined empires in Europe. Old Virginia, the mother of States and States- men, the blue hills and sweet vallies of Kentucky, the moun- tainous regions of Tennessee and North Carolina (the Switzei- land of America) the cotton and sugar regions of the Gulf States, the great State of Texas, together with Arkansas and Missouri, were only parts of the great Southern Confederacy. A question of serious difficulty arose in the minds of our great Statesmen, ■upon which very able arguments were adduced, both in the affir- mative and negative, viz: Whether we should admit into our Confederacy any of the free States of the North? Man}- con- tended that as Southern Illinois was certain to go with us, it would be better not to divide the State, but take in the whole, as F 42 it would be convenient to bring over to the Northern part of the State, the hirge number of fugitive shxves who had been for years collecting in those portions of her Majesty's dominions known as Tipper and Lo.wer Canada. Others were still more comprehensive and statermen-like in their views, and contended that it would not be too great a degree of condescension if we should admit, but not exactly upon an equal footing, that extensive territory known as the Northwestern States, although they were engaged in that homely occupation of raising meat and bread, nothing doubting, that in process of time the whole region of country, formerly known as the United States, would one by one gravitate towards the Southern Confederacy, and become an integral part thereof, excepting always that puritanical portion known as New England, which, with imprecations deep and loud, they swore never should be admitted into the Southern Confed- eracy. Such speculations as these were rife in the minds of some who had held high positions in the country. It is deeply to be regretted that the fond hopes and expectations of some, who had been Union men in principle, such as the Vice-President of the Southern Confederacy, (alas ! for the frailty of human nature and the love of office,) were to be so soon and so sadly disappointed. The professed principles and speculations of the co-opera- tionists presented, however, a magnificent theme for the stump orator to illustrate and enlarge upon, betbre an excited audience; and many were induced to vote the Secession ticket, in that disguised form, who were utterly opposed to separate State Seces- sion; and were never more ready for a fight than when called a disunionist. Any one who has been a close observer of the Secession move- ment, could not fail to see the artfiices resorted to by the leaders to urge the people along into the channel, by some means or other, in order to get the power out of their hands. Having once seized the reins of power, they knew that they would be enabled to drive them to the last extremity, rather than abandon their nefarious purposes. When the co-operationists met in the different State Conven- tions, they proved to be the most ultra Secessionists. The reins Avcre then in their own hands, and they could do as they please ; and they never intended to give back to the people the power to control their actions, as was proven by their refusal to permit 43 3S1- them to vote upon the ratification or rejection of the Constitution. They knew that the effort that had been made, in 1851, to stifle their love for the Union, had proven a failure, although led on by military chieftains fresh from tlie battle fields of Mexico, and now no means was to be spai'ed to get at least the appearance of con- sent, upon the part of the people, to carrj^ out their purposes. The true intention of the co-opei'ationists proved to have been, not so much that of co-operating with other States and Territories, in forming the great Southern Confederacy, as to co-operate among themselves in o.ettino' the hish offices in the new Government. By co-operation, this man who never could have attained to the high position of President of the United States, might get to be President of part of the United States, and that cei-tainly would be much better than never to be President at all; by co-operation that man who has never been enabled to obtain a seat in the Con- gress of the United States, might be enabled to obtain a seat in the Confederate Congress, and that would certainly be much bet- ter than never to have been honored with a seat in Congress at all; and by co-operation the other man who has been all his life fondly hoping for the happy period to arrive, when he would be honored with the high position of Envoy extraordinary and Minister plenipotentiary to the Court of St. James, or St. Cloud, but whose sterling merits and high qualifications have been so frequently and so unjustly overlooked, now sees his way clearly and speedily, into the honored presence of her Eoyal Majesty or Napoleon III. Take out from the leaders of the army of the Southern Confederacy all of the appointed and disappointed office-holders and office-seekers, and there would scarcely be enough left, if fully supplied with artillery, to stop the course of the defenceless "Silver Wave" in any attempt she might have made to pass the city of Vicksburg. Seriously, this raj)acious hunt after office has been one of the worst features in the Secession move- ment. Thousands upon thousands have prostituted their princi- ples, and gone into the army for no other purpose than the gratification of avarice or ambition; while as many others have been compelled to go for a livelihood. For the latter, there is a ready apology, but for the former there is no extenuation. Upon a final reckoning, the righteous judgment of an outraged com- munity will demand equal and distributive justice to all. The verdict of the country will be, "Let justice be done, though the Heavens fall." 44 CHAP TEE XI. Was the election of Abraham Lincoln and Hannibal Hamlin to the Presidency and Vice-Presidency of the United States, a sufficient cause for Secession?— The feeling in South Carolina when the result of the election ivas known— The effect on the other Southern States. I assumed the position, that the election of no man, constitu- tionally chosen to the high office of President or Vice-President of the United States, was a sufficient cause for any State to separate from the Union. We ought to stand by and aid still, in maintaining the Constitution of the country. To make a point ■ of resistance to the Government, to withdraw from it, because a man has been constitutionally elected, puts us in the wrong. We went into the election as one people, and took the chances of electing our candidate, and then to refuse to abide by the result, was unfair and dishonorable. But it was said that Mr. Lincoln's policy and principles were agamst the Constitution, and that if he carried them out, it would be destructive of our rights. We should not have anticipated a threatened evil. If he had violated the Constitution, then it would have been time enough to hold him accountable. The election of Lincoln and Hamlin was hailed by the Seces- sion papers in the following manner, as appeared in flamin.- capitals in the "Southron," published at Orangeburg Court House' South Carolina, in its issue of November 14th, 1860. "Glorious AND Cheering News. Lincoln and Hamlin Elected ! ! ! The State calls a Convention!!! A Dissolution or the Union Reduced to a Certainty!!! Grand Demonstration!!! Minute men moving!!! Torchlight Procession!!! No Com- promise ! : ! The South must Govern the South ! ! ! " With such manifestations of joy, as these, the most ultra Secessionists hailed the election of Lincoln and Hamlin, whom ■hoy had just previously denounced as the blackest Eepublicans ^.nd Abolitionists of the North. The cause of their joy is plain. They had long desired a dissolution of the Union, and now they were certain tbey had a pretext, which would be sufficient, with the people, to carry out their purposes. Some of the members of the South Carolina and Mississippi Conventions boasted that they 45 -ffiS had been Secessionists for thirty and forty years! It was, how- ever, far beneath the dignity of those wise, far-seeing and venera- ble statesmen, to condescend to designate the particular cause or question, whether the protection of shxvery, in the Territories or out of the Territories, or what other question, that at that earl}^ day, so justly entitled them to the merit of being the founders of the Secession party. The truth is, there was no cause then with them, or anybody else, for Secession, and the claim of those gentlemen was only antedated about a quarter of a century, to give age to their opinions, believing, no doubt, that their opinions, like their beverages, would imjjrove with that commendable qualification. It is true, that there had been, in the State of South Carolina, a deep-seated dissatisfaction with the general Government, since she had been humored with the compromise of 1832, of the nullifi- cation question, and she had been fretting and pouting like a spoiled child, upon every occasion she could find, likely to create a disturbance in the family. Instead of the ranternal tenderness exhibited towards that refractory child of the Union, upon that memorable occasion, if she had been given a smacking then, it would have proven far more conducive to the peace and quietude of the family, than anything else. But, having been so long humoured in her tantrums, she believed she could take almost any step, however shocking to decency or common sense, and Uncle Sam dare not say a word. When the result of the Presidential election was known, if it had been intimated that the State which had been known as the Harry Percy of Chivalry — the game cock of the South, — should live in the Union under the administration of such a " Monstrum horrendum" as a big. Black Eepublican, a rope or a revolver would have been unanimously adjudged the proper desert of the unfor- tunate wretch who dared such an insinuation. Before any of the other States had'timeto assemble their Con- ventions, the State of South Carolina was clean out of the Union. She passed the Ordinance -of Secession, unanimously, on the 20th of December, 1860 ; one hundred^and sixty-nine members voting. The next Sttite was Mississippi, on the 9th of January, 1861, and two days after, on the 11th of January, Alabama and Florida seceded, and on the 19th Georgia went " a kiting," as the expres- sion was familiarly used in our Convention, to cheer up the " weak- 46 kneed." On the 26th Louisiana speeded, and on the 1st of February Texas '■ went out," and so on. The effect of the seces- sion of South Carolina was very great in all of the Southern States, known as the Gulf States. Many of those States were settled by citizens of South Carolina, and a feeling of sympathy and State pride induced almost all of such persons readily to endorse the Secession movement. With but few exceptions, whenever a South Carolinian was met, he was sure to be found a Secessionist. It is a remarkable fact, however, that whenever a South Carolinian was found who was a Union man, he was the most thorough going and zealous Union man in the country ; and the same rsiiiy be justly said of those who have stood firmly in Mississippi, for the Union, throughout the whole Secession move- ment. For nearly two years they have endured a biirthen of taunts, indignities, and opprobious ejDithets, which have been heaped upon them by the dorminant party — the sons of some of them have been arrested for treason, for expressing their feelings of indignation at the passage of the Conscript law — they have been continually reproached for " not going to the war" — such a one " ought to be hung," has been constantly ringing in their ears — the term " abolitionist" has greeted them upon the corners of the streets — craven cowardice, the most degrading charge to a Southern man, has been imputed to them; even their families have not escaped the criminating reflections that have been so freely indulged by their Secession neighbors. It has often been exceed- ingly difficult for those in whom they had confidence, to restrain the indignation of the people at the countless oppressions under which they labored; and nothing but their defenceless condition, being deprived of arms or ammunition, and the means of obtain- ing them, has held the people in submission to the tyranieal military despotism of the so-called Southern Confederacy. The fear alone of actual suffering among their families, for the neces- saries of life, has kept back thousands, whose impulses would have led them to rush across the lines, and rally under the o'd Flair, under which their fathers fought and bled. If the authors of our calamities, particularly in South Ca^-olina, were the only sufferers from Secession, it would not be so much to be deplored, but the innocent, as well as the guilty, have had to suffer. 47 - Js-¥ CHAP TEE XII. The Fdnatlckm of Secession — PoUtical Parsons — Cautious politi- cians. One of the greatest difficulties to be encountered in eradi- cating the Secession sentiment, is with tlio.se who religiously believe that Secession is right. These men are honest in their belief, that Providence is on their side, and whether in victory or defeat, they have an ample fund of scriptural quotations at hand, with which either to rejoice or to cheer up the weak and fiiint- hearted. Within the last few years a set of political parsons have seized upon the subject of slavery as a Divine institution, and have rivaled the most fanatical enthusiasts of the North in their extreme views and zealous exertions. Should -a Southern man dare to express the opinions of the framers of the Constitution of the United States, with whom slavery was considered an irreme- diable evil, he was a lit subject for tne end of a rope, on the side of a black-jack. The evil produced by these political preachers illustrates thcAvisdom of our ancestors in drawing a line of separa- tion between Church and State, for, whenever they have meddled with the affairs of our Crovernment, either as Know-nothings or Secessionists, the result has been marked by the bloody foot-prints of their deluded followers. If ever, in the Providence of God, it should devolve upon the President of the United States, in " the enforcement of the laws," to deal out even-handed justice to all, it would be "a consumma- tion devoutly to be wished," that this peculiar class of individuals, whose holy calling presumes that they are ahvays ready to be received "into Abraham's bosom," should be the first subjects of the law of treason. Another misfortune, about as great as the horde of political parsons, with which the South has been cursed, which led more men astray, and turned the heads of more political aspirants and ambitious demagogues than any other event of the revolution, was the battle of Bull Eun. If all the buffalo bulls of the North- western prairies could have been gathered into one herd, and all the panic-stricken Yankees in McDowell's army placed in their front, and chased throughout the extensive regions of the cotton Confederacy, it would have occasioned a degree of amusement and gratification, not exceeding that occasioned by the news of the 48 victory which crowned their arms upon the banks of the aforesaid classical stream. Althoug repeatedly told by the writer, and a few others, that it would have no effect upon the ultimate result, and only occasion a greater slaughter of our people, the masses were too intensely excited to listen to anj^thing short of the extermination of the invaders — the captute of Washington — the reclamation of Maryland — the invasion of the North — the fall of Philadelphia, New York, and Boston, and the speedy "con- quering a peace." The calm, cool, calculating politician, who had cautiously looked on the contest, with nervous anxiety for an opportunity on either side, and it was no great matter on which, to distinguish himself, now thought he saw plainly the star that was to lead him on to fortune and to fame. The thunders of Bull Eun had completely cleared away the mist that had enveloped his eyes. The grievous oppressions to which the young South had so meekl}^ submitted for so many years of patient endurance, rose up afresh to his mind. His indignation was boiling hot to flesh his maiden sword in the cowardl}". carcass of some accursed Yankee. He longed for the time when he should " Fall like amazing thunder on the casque Of yon adverse pernicious enemy." His only serious difficulty was, Avhether as commander of a regiment, a brigade, or a division, Nature had designed him for the field; and to decide this perplexing mental controversy, "on to Richmond " was his rapid move. Soon clothed with a commis- sion from His Excellenly, the President of the Confederate States of North America, he returns in hot haste to the people to raise a company or regiment, vfith full assurance that he will soon be promoted to a brigadier. He calls meetings of the peoj^le and addresses them — his excited manner and nervous actions speak plainly that, " I am the rider of the wind, The stirrer of the storm, The hurricane I left behind Is yet with lightning warm." He takes peculiar pleasure, in his speeches, in arraying the Seces- sionist against the Union man, and very wisely insinuating that certain individuals " ought to be hung as high as Haman." When his company is made up and ordered to rendezvous at some particular^ place, he almost always finds important business for the company to attend to in the regions round about home. 49 Jn- His health not unfrequeiitly gives way, under the arduous hibors he has to endure for the glorious cause, and he becomes a prej^ to disease. When a great battle is " imminent," ho is sure to bo about home, but deeply laments his misfortune in not having the oj^portunity of correcting the gross errors committed by the commanders. Had he been there, things would have been other- wise. His criticisms are replete with learned historical illustra- tions. Csesar nor Hannibal, Napoleon nor Wellington, was over so ftimiliar with strategical movements. Had his advice been followed, Washington would have been taken long ago; the Potomac, as well as the Ohio, would have been crossed, and their army quartered upon the enemy's country, and they would have been made to feel the desolating effects of the war. These vipers, in their mean endeavors to crawl up to some high places, have done more to poison the minds of the ignoi'ant and credulous, than any other class of creatures that have cursed the Southern country. Keally, regardless of the merits of the con- troversy, and generally too ignorant to understand the points of difference in the political questions involved, the only inquiry is, how can I make the most out of the troubles of the country ? They seek alone to promote their own selfish purposes. Were they north of their lines, they would be equally clamorous for the Union, and for no better purpose. There is but one other class of beings, engaged in the war, that sinks lower in the scale of human depravity than the one referred to, and that is the speculating extortioner. Whilst the political demagogue seeks to elevate himslf, he does not even seek to raise himself above the low level of groveling gain. With wolfish relish, he laps the blood of the helpless innocent, and with tiger ferocity, he plunders the afflictions of age. The cries of the widow and orphan make no more impression upon his callous heart than the rattle of his dollars would upon the cold tombstone of the dead. C H A P T E E XIII. Webster's Reply to Hayne — TJhe Clearest and Best Refutation of the Right of JVullification, or Secession — Extract from Mr. Webster's Great Speech. To any one who was a participator in the movements preced- ing secession, it is obvious, that if the people had believed that . ' 50 they did not possess the right of secession, but only the common rigiit oi" revolution, the}^ would never have given their authority to their leaders to inaugurate war. If the great speech of Daniel Webster, delivered in the Senate of the United States, on the 20th of January, 1880, in reply to Mr. Hayne, in which he 80 clearly refutes the South Carolina doctrine, had been generally read and understood by the people, they would never have voted for secession. It was attempted by the leaders to draw a distinc- tion between the right to nullify and the right to secede, but the South Carolina dortrine of Mr. Calhoun and Mr. Hayne, was the fouiKlation for the whole movement. The following extract from that speech should be impressed upon the mind of every American citizen ; " The great question is, ivhose prerogative is it to decide on the const itutioncdity or unconstitufiotiality of the laws ? On that, the debate hinges. The proposition that, in case of a supposed viola- tion of the Constitution by Congress, the States have a constitu- tional right to interfere, and annul the law of Congress, is the proposition of the gentleman. I do not admit it. If the gentle- man had intended no more than to assert the right of revolution for justifiable cause, he would have only said what all agi'ee to. But I cannot conceive that there can be a middle course, between submission to the laws, when regularly pronounced constitutional, on the one hand, and open resistance, which is revolution, or rebellion, on the other. [ say the right of a State to annul a law of Congress, cannot be maintained, but on the ground of the unalienable right of man to resist oppression; that is to say, upon the ground of revolution. I admit that there is an ultimate violent remedy, above the Constitution, and in defiance of the Constitution, which may be resorted to, when a revolution is to be justified. But I do not admit that, under the Constitution, and in conformity with it, there is any mode in which a State govern- ment, as a member of the Union, can interfere and stop the progress of the general government, by force of her own laws, xinder any circumstances whatever. 'This leads us to inquire into the origin of the government, and the source of its power. Whose agent is it? Is it the creature of the State Legisletures, or the creature of the peojjle ? If the government of the United States be the agent of the State gov- ernments, then tlicy may control \t, provided they can agree in the j-uinner of controlling it; if it be the agent of the people then the 51 JU people alone can control it, restrain it, modify, or reform it. It is observable enough, that the doctrine for which the honorable gentleman contends, leads him to the necessity of maintaining not only that this general government is the creature of the States, but that it is the creature of each of the States severaibj ; so that each may assert the power, for itself, of determining whether it acts within the limits of its autlierity. It is the servant of four and twenty masters, of ditferent wills and different purposes, and yet bound to obey all. This absurdity (for it seems no less) arises from a misconception as to the origin of this government and its true character. It is, sir, the people's Constitution, the people's government 5 made for the people; made by the peopli; ; and answerable to the people. The people of the United States have declared that this Constitution shall be the supreme law. Wc must either admit the proposition, or dispute their authority. The States are unquestionably sovereign, so far as their sove- reignty is not affected by this supreme law. But the State legis- latures, as political bodies, however sovereign, are yet not sovereign over the people. So fiir as the people have given power to the general government, so i'-xv the grant is unquestionably good, and the government holds of the people, and not of the State govern- ments. We are all agents of the same supreme power, the people. The general government and the State governments derive their authority from the same source. JSTeither can, in relation to the other, be called primaiy, though one is definite and restricted and the other general and residuarj*. The national government pos- sesses those powers which it can be shown the people have conferred on it, and no more. All the rest belongs to the State governments or to the people themselves. So far as the people have restrained State sovereignty by the expression of their will, in the Constitution of the United States, so far, it must be admitted, vState sovereignty is effectually controlled. I do not contend that it is, or ought to be controlled farther. The sentiment to which I have referred, propounds that State sovereignty is to be controlled by its own "feeling of justice;" that is to say, it is not to be con- trolled at all; for one who is to follow his own feelings is under no legal control. Noav, however men may think this ought to be, the fact is, that the people of the United States have chosen to impose control on the State sovereignties. There are those, doubtless, who wish they had been left without restraint ; but the Constitution has ordered Ihe matter differently. To make 52 war, for instance, is an exercise of sovereignty; but the Consti- tution declares that no State shall make war. To coin money is another exercise of sovereign power; but no State is at liberty to coin money. Again, the Constitution says that no sovereign State shall be so sovereign as to make a treaty. These prohibi- tions, it must be confessed, are a control on the State sovereignty of South Carolina, as well as of the other States, which does not arise " from her own feelings of honorable justice." Such an opinion, tliereforc, is in detianee of the plainest provi,sions of the Constitution." Language could not express more forcibly, or in plainer terms, the true character of our government. I am constrained to say, that at one time my own mind was favorably inclined to the South Carolina doctrine; and it was not until I had carefully read the debate, including Mr. Webster's great speech, that I clearly saw its fallacy; and I indulge the hope that thousands who may read these pages, will be induced to give the same impartial and nuprejudiced examination to Mr. Webster's powerful and unan- swerable arguments. If the people of the United States only clearly understood the structure of our government, as it was intended to have been nndcrstood by its framers, there would never be any danger of its ^ dissolution. CHAPTEE XIV. The hypocracy of the Secessionists — Thepojndar Vote of the Seceded States — The sentiment among Southern women — Dialogue between a Southern Lady and an enroller under the Conscript law. How any people could expect that Providence would favor a cause that had to be bolstered up by hypocracy, dissimulation, duplicity, and even downright falsehood, is beyond the compre- liension of any ordinary capacity to perceive, or even the bright- ness of genius to penetrate. The greatest leaders of the move- ment have used the utmost deception with the people, and in the most artful and fascinating manner. They seemed to possess the " Smooth dissimulation skilled to grace, A devil's purpose with an angel's face." t Their daily conversation has been a tissue of the most dis- gusting fabrications. When in the pi-eseaee of Union men, bo Jry however, they frequently trhn their conversation accordingly ; and even men of Union sentiments, when in the presence of their Secession neiglibors, have been conijielled to resort to the same hypocritical course of duplicity, joining in with their tirade of extravagant falsehoods and mendacious exasperations. Their only excuse is, perhaps, that it is better to folio w the advice of Solomon, and "answer a fool according to his folly," for he tells us very truly, that " though thou sliouldst bray a fool in a mortar among the wheat, with a pestle, yet will not his foolishness depart from him." There is one subject upon which there has heen more false- hood and misrepresentation, perhaps, than upon any other, and that is the popular vote of the Seceding States. After man}' calls for the popular vote of Louisiana, it was tinally published, and turned out to be a Secession majority of only about three thousand — not as many as there were voters in the State v»^ho did not vote at all, and who would have, no doubt, voted against Secession. In Mississippi, the papers represented that the majority was thirty thousand for Secession, when, in fact, if the votes of those Avho did not vote at all were counted with those who voted the Co-operation ticket, it will be found that the Separate State Secession ticket was in the minority; and it was only by a betrayal of the people that the Secession Ordinance was passed. During the whole progress of the war, Mississippi has been represented, by the Secession papers, as a unit, when, in truth, in the central county of the State, — "the free State of Attala*" — during the whole contest, the strongest Union sentiment has pre- vailed ; a sentiment that has been bold and out-spoken, despite the taunts and threats of the party in power. The Southern ladies have been represented as unanimous for Secession. This is equally untrue. The following dialogue between an enroller of the conscripts and a lady, as i-elated by himself, is a pretty fair sample of the sentiments of some, at least, in the country : Enroller. Good morning, madam; where is your husband this morning ? Lady. lie is over in Mr. Jones's field, working out his corn. He promised to tend it for him while he was gone to the war. Enroller. How old is your husband, madam ? Lady. He is somewhere l)etween forty-two and forty-four. I don't know exactly, how old. \»* 54 Enroller. You are certain ho is over thirty-five ? Lady. Yes sir, he is; bat what are you asking me such ques- tions for? Enroller. I am sent out by the authorities, madam, to enrol the conscripts betAveen eighteen and thirty-five years of age. Lady. I thought you were out on some such business as that. You are sent out by old Pettis, I reckon. If I had my way with him, I would souse his head in a whisky barrel, and hold it there till he was droAvned — an old villian, he is sending oiY all the men to the Avar, and leaA^ing us poor women and children here to starve. Enroller. If you did not souse it too deep, madam, I expect Governor Pettus would as soon have his head in a whisky barrel as anyAvhere else. Lady. I would souse it just deep enough to drown him : that's how deep 1 would souse it. If the fate of the Secession leaders could be determined by a jury of the mothers of the young men, whose lives have been sacrificed in this most unnecessary, unnatui-al and unlioly Avar, they would haA-e about as much chance of an acquittal as the most obnoxious specimen of the canine race, upon proof positive of the slaughter of an innocent flock of sheep. CHAPTEE XV. A Be-uiiion in feeling among the people of the United States, should be the ardent desire of every patriot. The ardent desire of every American patriot should be to see a re-union in feeling among the people of the United States. Upon no other basis can our country ever be restored to its former prosperity and happiness. ISow that tlie tocsin of Avar Aviil soon be hushed, and the great family quarrel terminated, all eyes should he turned to peace and reconciliation. As Ave all have to lire together in the same family, let us live together in peace and ti'anquility. Let us forgive and forget. Let us approach each other in the spirit of conciliation and friendship. Let all those i)0 S^i who have been bound together by the mystic ties of brotherhood, renew their covenants, and meet as friends. Let those of extreme views agree to disagree, and bury their differences. Let each section say to the other, we will " Be to your faults a little blind And to your virtues very kind." Let US rather contemplate the good, than the evil, that may result from this deplorable Avarfare. When re-united our govern- ment will stand upou a firmer basis than ever. The strength and power of the nation has been fully tested, and proven equal to any emergency. When re-united and harmonious, we will be the greatest military and maratime power on the globe. Uncle Sam will never be caught napping again. Our navy has exhibited a power that has astonished all Europe, and now threatens to snatch the trident from old Neptune himself. What the boasted mistress of the seas, aided by the brave veterans of the Peninsula and Waterloo, failed to accomplish, the American sailor and soldier has promptly performed. Of our country it may now truly be said, that, "America neeeds no bulwarks, No towers along her steep ; Her march is o'er the mountain-wave, Her home is on the deep." The idea that the South is subju.o-ated, seems to be a great obstacle with many of our people. This is not true. It is not the South that is subjugated, but secession that is subjugated; and no one should rejoice so much in its subjugation as the Union men of the South. They have suffered more, during the progress of the war, than any one else. Whilst the starving process has been going on, the secessionists have combined to starve out the Union men. The power which wealth always gives, has been brought to bear most heavily upon the poorer classes, producing a degree of suffering almost incredible in a country professing to be free. The Union men of the South, instead of being subjugated, have been liberated from the tyranny of contemptible, i^etty officials, and militaiy despots. A love for the Union should be cherished, and renewed upon' all suitable occasions. The fourth of July, and the twenty- second of February, should again be celebrated throughout the length and bread bh of the country. W^ith the same feeling that Napoleon embraced the eagles of France, the Old Flag should be hailed by ever}' citizen of the United States. 5G The following patriotic sentiment should receive a ready response in every heart : " A Union of hearts, a Union of hands. A Union that none can sever ; A Union of Lakes, a Union of lands, The American Union forever." If the time shall ever come when a reunion of fraternal feelinsf, such as existed among our fathers, shall be all-pervading through- out the length and breadth of this wide-extended country; when the swords of the warriors shall be turned into plough-shares, and their spears into pruning hooks, we may truly realize that mil- lenial period, prophetically foretold, when "the wolf also shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the kid; and the calf and the young lion and the fatling together, and a little child shall lead them. And the cow and the bear shall feed ; their young ones shall lie down together; and the lion shall eat straw like the ox." " Then peace on earth shall hold her easy sway, And man forget his brother man to slay ; To m;n tial arts, shall milder arts succeed ; Who blesses most shall gain the immortal meed. The eye of pity shall be pained no more, With Victory's crimson banner stained with gore. — Thou bounteous era come! Hail blessed time! When fuU-orbed freedom shall unclouded shine. When the chaste muses cherished by her rays. In olive groves shall tune their sweetest lays. — When bounteous Ceres shall direct her car O'er fields now blasted with the fires of war, And angels view with joy and wonder joined The golden age return to bless mankind." LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 013 703 824 9 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 013 703 824 9 Hollinger pH8.5 Mill Run F3-1955 ^