.^^pm^M^^^p^^^mffif^ ,rvr\nOi*« { LIBRARY OF CONGRESS. y1 - - — a UNITED STATtS OF AMERICA. Jl ^^^^Ar '^^^^«fi«S«saAA^ a^^i^A*' g^S^^^^^^^^6^^^^^<^ mmr^'^^^^ .AH'^A/^n/ ^^'^n^A. WKfiRRHA»R:»«n^^^' '^^■'^/^fl<*l!5^^ ^.r>n^Vvi/iA mmm^^ ^^m^ The People Coming to Power ! SPEECH WENDELL PHILLIPS, Esq., SALISBUEY BEACH GATHEEING, SEPTEMBER 13, 1871. * »»^ > ^ BOSTON : LEE & SHEPAKD, 1871. ^ ADDRESS OF WENDELL PHILLIPS AT THE SALISBURY BEACH GATHERING, SEPT. 13, 1871. Fellow Citizens .-—General Butler told you this was a gathering, on the seaside, of all parties and all classes of men, and that he hoped his remarks would not offend the prejudices of any class or of any party. Gentlemen, I recognize, as he does, the duty we owe to the harmony of this occasion ; but if I thought, fellow-citizens, that I should leave Salisbury Beach without treading on some- body's toes, I should regret I ever came here. What is the use of a thousand men meeting together to compare notes — to exchange ideas one Avith the other — if we do not leave, after we separate, some hint, some seed, some suggestion, that will bear fruit— that will clear up the doubts, cut away the underbrush, and enable men to see clearer and act more nobly ? I came here on purpose to offend your prejudices ; I did not come for any other reason ; because, fellow-citizens, if you stood here, and I was one of the crowd now before me, I should hope that you would drop some salt, or endeavor to stir the waters of the public mind, for the health and life of us all. Gentlemen, I came down here to say something about the governor of Massachusetts that is to be. And in the first place, I did not come from any personal interest in the office. You know when Henry IV. of France came to a city in his dominions, the mayor said, "May it please your majesty, we have not fired any salute, for two reasons. In the first place, we have no cannon ; and in the second place, we have no powder." In like manner, there is one reason why I shall never be governor of Massachusetts, and that is because nobody will ever vote for me. Then there is another reason equally potent, which is, that if everybody in the State voted for me, I would not take the office. So I have no personal interest, as an individual, in the question of who is governor of Massachusetts. But, gentlemen, I have an interest in common with you, holding as we do the honor and the prosperity of the State very dear to us, and that is the reason I have come down here to-day. There has been a great deal of 'talk lately, and a great deal of writing in the newspapers, touching men who, it is said, have honored Massachusetts, within the last twenty years, by accepting the governor's chaii*. Now, to tell the truth, between me and you, in strict confi- dence, I have been living twenty years, and I have seen no such man. There was but one man before the Revo- lution who ever honored Massachusetts by being her governor, and that man was Sir Henry Vane. When that noble man, far-seeing statesman and generous patriot, who sealed his devotion to liberty on the scaflfold, — when he accepted the governor's chair of Massachusetts, he honored the State. And there has been one man since the Revolution who has honored the State by accepting her highest office, and only one. That man was Samuel Adams — old Sam Adams of Boston ; almost the only — certainly the ablest — statesman that Massachusetts lent to the Revolution. This is an old festival. It has been held for a century of more, and it is not out of place, therefore, to say a word of the far past. I say New England gave only three great men to the Revolution — marvellously great men. One was Benjamin Franklin, the second was Samuel Adams, and the third was Nathaniel Greene, of Rhode Island — the general that should have had prece- dence of Washington, if it had not been necessary then, as ever since, to pet the wayward and childish South in order to keep her on any decent level. These are the three great men that New England lent the Revolution, and there is no name in all our history that deserves to be named in the same week with these three. After them, at a long interval, comes your own Timothy Picker- ing, a pure, able statesman ; and by his side stands Jon- athan Trumbull of Connecticut — the man who gave rise to the phrase "Brother Jonathan " ; for when Washing- ton doubted what to do, it is said the wise old Virginian used to stop and say, " Ask Brother Jonathan^'' Gentlemen, within the last twenty years Massachusetts has conferred honor whenever she has conferred office. She has not received any. And I have to say, that among the worthy men whom for fifty years Massachu- setts has chosen to put into her governor's chair, there is not one that will do more credit to the State than he who has just left this platform, and to whose voice you have just listened. (Applause.) I know the long list of the governors ; I know all that can be said for Brooks, Briggs, Andrew, or any one else that may be your favorite ; but when history comes to record the great names and the great services Massachusetts has rendered to the nation and to the age, she will write the name of Benjamin F. Butler as high, if not higher, than any of those men who have filled the governor's chair for fifty years. I know what I assert; and though I do not choose to name any one of the long catalogue of candi- dates this year, yet I ask every one of you, no matter to what party you belong or what name you worship, Show me a name in that long list which has been oflfered for your votes this fall, show me one who represents an idea. Show me the man among these candidates who, if he died to-morrow, any great progressive idea or movement would lose a champion. You know, every one of you, that death, in its mysterious interposition, might sweep from the stage of human affairs all these worthy gentle- men, and the cause of humanity and progress would not be the poorer. They are good merchants ; they are good lawyers ; they are worthy men ; they will stand in the rank and file tall as anybody else ; but if any man here, familiar with the record, will tell me what service either of them has rendered, or even promises to render, to human progi'ess, I will be a most patient listener. The only value any public man has, in my eyes, is the aid he aims or is able to give toward lifting off the unnecessary bur- dens of society, remodelling what is unjust and remedy- ing what is defective, and raising the mass of mankind to greater comfort, wisdom and virtue. Gentlemen, I do not mean to attack any individual. I did not come here for any personal criticism. General Butler said, the other day — I think at Fitchburg — that when I had the misfortune to be candidate for the gov- ernor's chair last year, I let the papers run over me, but that he chose to fight. "Well, we have good authority, both of us, for the course we have pursued. The wise King of Israel left rules that commend both methods. General Butler has adopted one, and I adopted the other. We both have the sanction of scripture for our. course. Solomon says, "Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him." Well, I shrunk from that positively, and so did not answer. But in the next verse Solomon says, ^^ Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he appear wise in his own conceit." General Butler has followed this last advice, and taken the con- ceit out of them. (Applause.) I don't know which is the b^st way. I don't believe both ways united will ever annihilate the fools'of the Commonwealth. But let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind. I am perfectly satisfied with my experience, as I did not get into the State House. I hope General Butler will be equally satisfied, and get into the State House as a con- sequence of his method. But, gentlemen, this is a question that overrides all persons. If it had been merely a question whether Benj. F. Butler should be governor of Massachusetts, I should not be here to-day. For sincere as is my appreciation of the services he has rendered to the Nation and to the Commonwealth, and firm as is the friendship I bear him for all that he has done since the first shot of the great rebellion, yet even those considerations would not bring me here. If that were all, it would not be worth while for me to come here. Perhaps it would be better, at any rate, that I should stay away, for I am not sure that I shall make him a single friend. But to my idea this question overrides men, and the only interest which brings me here is because it overrides men. I thank 8 General Butler, and this is the reason why I am here to- day. As a citizen of the State, I thank him for giving ns an opportunity to fight this battle under his flag. And this is the battle which I mean. Gentlemen, the Repub- lican party is dead ; the only mistake is that it fancies it- self alive, and resists burial. As Edmund Burke said sev- enty years ago, there is many a man walking this earth, who supposes himself to be alive. So the Republican pai'ty supposes itself to be alive and denies its grave- clothes. It is a mill without any grist. The party has nothing to do and proposes nothing. It has achieved all it was organized to achieve. It is no fault of the honor- able men whose names have been put before the public as candidates, that they represent nothing. The party they lead " lags superfluous on the stage." This great country, its material interests presenting new questions every hour, — rocking with social convulsions, — teeming with men and forces that struggle for a place to mould the age and benefit the world, — such a country is no cabinet chamber where laurelled men scramble for office. It is the field where the tools ever offer them- selves to him who can use them ; and where, through respected and accepted men, or over them, the work of the hour must be done. Active and able to-day pushes aside laggard yester^ay^ who finds nothing to do but recounting what he did last week. In 1844, 1856 and 1861, who needed to go far to find what the Republican party planned ? Every man who hated slavery loved it, every man who loved slavery hated it. But slavery is dead. We have not only abol- ished slavery, but we have abolished the negro. We have actually washed color out of the Constitution. Lin- 9 coin abolished sLavery, and the fifteenth amendment abol- ished the negro. In law he is as white as you are. There is nothing for that party to do. It does not propose to do anything. It is contented to hold ofilce, to reap the harvest and to enjoy the honors of its history. If you narrowly watch it, you will find that the leading Repub- lican men are settling down into the mood of the old Whig party in 1856. It was a worthy party. I am not here to criticise the lifetime of the Whig party ; it was a respectable party and did its duty; the difliculty was that it tried to sit in state when it ought to have been buried. That is the trouble with all parties. They linger bn the staore long after we need them. Although " the brains are out, the party won't die." In that stage of alFairs such a man as Butler is flung, forced iip to repre- sent a new idea. We protected the Mack laborer, and now we are going to protect the laborer. North and South ; labor everywhere. Gentlemen, the question for the next ten years is the relation of labor to capital. That is called the workingman's party. All of you prob- ably own farms. Many of you employ laborers or keep shops. You think, when I have stated the question so, that I mean the question between the man that earns two dollars a day and the man who earns sixty millions ; that is not the qi\estion. The meaning of the labor ques- tion in Europe and in this country is this : Whether you on these acres, on yonder waves, or in the mills shall work honestly, industriously, soberly, for seventy long years, and then die worth a thousand or two thousand dollars, a small house, forty acres of land, or nothing, while some financial sponge sucks up millions. Do you know that out of one hundred men, the record is that there are not more than seven that leave any estate to be 10 administered. Seven out of a hundred. What has be- come of the rest ? Why, some of them lie in drunkards' graves. I don't pity them. Some of them were born fools and did not amount to anything from the begin- ning ; there is no need of concerning ourselves about them. Why, here are a hundred babies born to-day. Seventy years hence ten of them will lie in drunkards' graves, ten more will have turned out half-baked men, not able to make their own bread ; ten more will be worth a decent competency ; ten more will be worth from ten to fifty millions ; and of the sixty left, nearly all of them will beg of their neighbors, each moi-ning, leave to toil. Now, what I say is, I find no fault that Vander? bilt is worth fifty millions of dollars ; I find no fault that Stewart is worth one hundred millions of dollars. What I say is this : that this system of finance by which one man at sixty years old has gathered fifty millions of dol- lars, and of the ten thousand men that work for him, seven thousand get up every morning not knowing where dinner is coming from, — that system of finance belongs to the bottomless pit, and the sooner it goes home the better. The system is unjust, cruel and fatal to any true re- public. The safety of our institutions, justice and Chris- tianity dictate that out of the common profits, capital should have less and labor should have more than it now does. I do not blame anybody ; but I am detemiined, as far as I am concerned, that the brains of this generation shall try to tear that system open and let the light into it, and the readiest way I know is by political action. Do you want to get all these college men and statesmen to turn their attention to any matter ? Carry it into poli- tics. Do you want to set all the newspapers to talking 11 about labor ? Don't go on your knees or into the editor's office and ask him if he will or no. Do not be fooled into writing an article and paying a hundred dollars for printing. It is money thrown away. But when the month of October comes, nominate a ;• man that represents this problem ; give him from twenty to seventy thousand votes majority, and every man in the Commonwealth, from Barnstable to Berkshire, will eat, drink, sleep, dream and write nothing but labor from the next January to the next December. Brains rule this Commonwealth ; and HeaA^en pity us if the day ever comes when brains do not rule it. They ought to rule it. A just cause, a well-grounded complaint, and a hundred patient, earnest men, will capture, at last, the brains and hearts of the age. What, then, is General Butler's offence ? This is his offence. He revealed the dry-rot of the Republican party. Ithuriel-like, he called the roll of his party on its own camping ground — man — and immediately every sword turned on him, betrayed the secret that its leaders were planning to make it only a brotherhood of office- holders and a tool of capital. But " such personality " — " see every journal an-aigning him" — yes, if it were not so I would not have given a sixpence for him. If I go into an orchard, wanting pears, I naturally go to the tree that has been the most pelted with brick-bats. If I get into the Commonwealth and want to know the man that represents the radical ideas of his time, give me the man that has made enemies by thousands every time that he has piit his foot down. I went into one of the burying grounds in the next county to this, and I read an epitaph, " Here lies a man who never had an enemy." ■ Well, I said to myself, then here 12 lies a man who never had an idea. If you find a man in politics of whom everybody speaks well, I will tell you that his soul is made up of soft-soap; he is a "mush of concession"; you cannot feel him in a dark night if you run against him. Now, the only reason Avhy General Butler has stirred these people and the press so much is, that every man who holds office or position here is contented with the present state of affiiirs. In response to his criticism they cry out, " Art thou come to disturb us before our time V " I have tried it for thirty years and I know where the pelting of the newspapers comes from. I have given thirty years of my life — and I i-ejoice to have been permitted to give them — to the redemption of a race. If I am spared another ten years, I hope I shall be permitted to give them to the re