Glass COPYRIGHT DEPOSIT / Cbc new Court l)o«$e of monroe County new Vork THE NEW COURT HOUSE OF MONROE COUNTY Published by THE ROCHESTER PUBLISHING COMPANY, 763 Powers Bldg^ Rochester, N. Y. NEW MONROE COUNTY COURT HOUSE. The New Court House OF Monroe County ITS ARCHITECTURE, CONSTRUCTION AND COST, WITH A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE ERECTION OF MONROE COUNTY AND ITS FIRST AND SECOND COURT HOUSES 3W ROCHESTER, NEW YORK MDCCCXCVI Copyright, 1S95, by Charles A. Watkvns. '-/^/7 C STATUE OF JUSTICE ON DOME OF SECOND COURT HOUSE. The County of Monroe HILH it is not within the scope of this Memorial of the Court Houses of Monroe County, New York, to review the oft-told history of the invasion of the white man into the land of the Iroquois, it has been very properly t;uggested that a relation of the establishment of the county of Monroe would be entirely in keeping. Briefly, then, it may be stated that in 1716, ninety years after the appearance of Father Daillon, a French missionary and presumably the first white man to enter Western New York, the French built a fort, probably at Sea Breeze, to command rondequoit Bay. After the Revolution Oliver Phelps and Nathaniel Gorham bought 2,6oo,cxx) acres of land, including the present site of Rochester, from Massachusetts and the Indians. They in turn sold to Robert Morris 1,264,569 acres. The land in Rochester that was not ;old by Phelps and Gorham to Robert Morris was a tract of one hundred acres which they had previously transferred to Ebenezer Allan on rendition that he would build a mill on it. Ebenezer or "Indian" Allan, so-called from his associations with the Indians, is regarded as :he first Caucasian to settle at the Falls of the Genesee. He built his mill in 1789, and the mill-stones, one of red and the other of grey iranite-like stone, and three feet and nine inches in diameter and from nine to eleven inches thick, are now to be seen in the west A-all of the cortili' of the New Court House. But it was not for nearly a score of years that the improvements were begun that have made Rochester one of the most widely known of American cities. The city's history may be said to have begun when the purchase of the hundred-acre-tract was made by Charles Carroll, William Fitzhugh, and Nathaniel Rochester. This was accomplished in 1803 and cost them ;gi750, that being the price isked by John Johnston, at the time attorney for Sir William Pulteney, the owner. In 1809 the Legislature passed an act authorizing the Supervisors of Ontario and Genesee counties to provide for the "building 3f a bridge across the Genesee river between the towns of Boyle and Northampton, at the place where the North State road crosses the iaid Genesee river." The bridge cost ;^2000 and was completed in 1812. The determination to build a bridge gave a decided impetus to the embryo city. The second war with Great Britain, however, considerably retarded the growth of Rochester, but with its termination Rochester entered upon a period of enlargement that has no limitations. In 1818 the population was 1049. Until 1821 Ontario county included the eastern half of Monroe, all of Wayne, all of the present Ontario, the eastern part of Livingston, and all of Yates counties. Genesee county included the western half of Monroe, the western part of Livingston, all of Orleans and of the present Genesee counties. The county seat of Genesee was at Batavia, and that of Ontario was at Canandaij^ua. The viila^ie of Rochester was therefore partly in Ontario and partly in Genesee county, the river being the dividing line. In those days debtors who were unable to pay judgments againt them were liable to imprisonment for debt, but the sheriff of the county to whom an execution for the collection of the debt was delivered could arrest the debtor onlv within the limits of his jurisdiction. Old residents of Rochester say that it was a common thing to see a luckless debtor running with all speed from the pursuing sheriff, to cross the middle of the bridge connecting the two parts of the village, for when he crossed that line he could not be arrested by the sheriff of the county on the other side. The two counties, Ontario and Genesee, in 1816, had a population of about eighty thousand and comprised a territory of about thirty-seven thousand square miles, a district considerably larger than the state of Rhode island. The difficulties which the people of Rochester and the neighborhood had in doing county business were enough to suggest the desirability of forming a new county, with Rochester as its seat of justice. But little commercial business was done by these persons either at Canandaigua or Batavia, except in connection with the courts held at those places, and the county clerk's, sheriff's, and treasurer's offices. Their ordinary business did not take them there in those days ; the roads were bad and the bridges were poor, and the excursions of travelers from Rochester to these county seats were not only arduous, but sometimes even dangerous. Neither Canandaigua nor Bata\'ia was a center of trade, while Rochester was, and the reasons of the promoters of the scheme were both forcible and urgent. As early as December, 18 16, the matter of the division of Ontario and Genesee counties was agitated in Rochester and a subscription list was circulated to raise funds "for erecting the Court House and Gaol, provided the Legislature at their next session shall * « * mcorporate a new county from the northwest part of Ontario and the north part of Genesee counties and shall fix the seat of justice of said new county » * * near the bridge at the Genesee Falls." Subscriptions were obtained to the amount of $6722.50 from residents of the village of Rochester, of which amount $387.50 was to be paid in lumber, team work, and labor. Charles Carroll, William Fitzhugh, Nathaniel Rochester, and the firms of Montgomery & Rochester, F. Brown & Company, and Frederick, Abraham, and Charles Hanford subscribed $500 each. Every prominent citizen added his name to the list. The petition circulated at that time among the inhabitants of the counties of Ontario and Genesee, praying for a new county, recites, among other things, that the administration of justice should be speedy and certain ; that four terms of court were held in each year in Ontario county, and three in Genesee ; that it was not unusual for a moiety of the issues joined in each of those counties to be unavoidably put over from term to term ; that in the short time of five years a wilderness had been made to retire before the hand of industry and to give place to villages, wealth, and the arts ; that, while the petitioners were led by multiplied concerns to the settlements on the Genesee river, it was seldom that they visited Canandaigua or Batavia for any other objects than attendance upon courts or calls at public offices ; that those places possessed no local advantages, independent of being shire towns, to render them seats of business. This petition asked for a county substantially of the dimensions and bounds of the present Monroe, and was signed by several thousand persons. Two plans were evolved about the same time, looking to the desired result. One was "to set off twelve miles on the west side of Ontario county and twelve miles on the east side of Genesee county, and to make two new counties about twenty-four miles square each." The other was to make this whole district, twenty-four miles wide by forty-eight miles long, into one county, with a county seat at Avon. Petitions opposing the division were also circulated and signatures were obtained to the number of a little less than two thousand. Residents of Canandaigua and of a few other parts of the two old counties actively resisted any division whatever, being led in their opposition by county and State officers. Colonel Nathaniel Rochester and Dr. Matthew Brown, Jr., were selected as agents of the petitioners for the new county, and went to Albany early in 1817 to present the petitions and to advocate the plan, as well as to secure the incorporation of the village of Rochester. At the session of the Legislature a favorable report was secured from the committee of the Assembly, but the plan failed in the Assembly itself. The village of Rochesterville was, however, incorporated on April 21, 1817, and retained that name until April 12, 1822, when it was changed to Rochester. No active steps were taken to proceed in the matter of the division until the aLitumn nf 1817, when meetings were held in the different towns which it was proposed t(i unite in the new county, and petitions were circulated similar to that presented to the previous Legislature. The desire for the division of the old counties kept increasing, and an active campaign was begun in October, 1818, by the appointment of delegates from the towns, and a meeting at A. Ensw(jrth's in Rochesterville. Pittsford, Brighton, Henrietta, and Perinton in Ontario county, and Riga, Parma, Gates, and Ogden in Genesee county, were represented at tliis convention. It was decided tliat these towns, together with Penfield, Murray, Sweden, and a part of Bergen, should be included in the proposed county. A committee was appointed to prepare a petition to the Legislature and separate committees in each town were selected to circulate it. The petition was presented to the Assembly on January 12, 1819, and was immediately referred to a committee, which reported favorably on January 29, but two attempts to secure favorable action in the Assembly failed of success. This failure was due to the fear of the rival political parties that the division of the old counties and the erection of new ones would introduce elements of uncertainty into the campaigns of that spring and of the succeeding spring. In the fall of 1819 there was still greater energy and activity on the part of the divisionists, who had suffered defeat in the elections of the previous spring. A convention of delegates from the towns interested in the proposed division was held on December 2, 1819, at A. Ensworth's m Rochesterville, and committees were appointed for the purpose of appearing before the coming Legislature with a petition which was referred to the standing committee of the Assembly on counties, which, after hearing many parties both for and against the proposed division, recommended that the matter be postponed to the succeeding Legislature. In this the Assembly concurred. The year 1820 was a presidential year. At this period the electors for president and vice-president were appointed by the Legislature, and the political complexion of the Legislature to be elected in the spring of 1820 was of more than ordinary importance. This fact doubtless had much to do with the report of the committee of the Assembly and the postponement of all proceedings by the Legislature of that year. Nevertheless, the petitioners were not discouraged by four successive failures, and with increased zeal and vigor took proceedings during the summer and autumn of 1820 to make their next attempt a sure success. The Legislature met on January 9, 1821. The petitions for the new counties were presented this time to the Senate. Counter petitions by thirteen hundred remonstrants were offered by the opponents of division. On January 22 the bill to erect Monroe county passed the Senate by a unanimous vote. In the Assembly the bill met with vigorous opposition, but was passed by a vote of seventy-three to twenty-seven. The council of revision, then having the veto power, approved the bill on February 23, 1821, and the act stands as chapter 57 of the laws of 1821, and is entitled, " An act to erect a new county by the name of Monroe, from parts of the counties of Ontario, Genesee, and for other purposes." The new county, named after James Monroe, then the President of the United States, included the towns of Gates, Parma, Ogden, Clarkson, Brighton, Penfield, Perinton, Pittsford, Mendon, Henrietta, a part of Sweden, a part of Rush, and a portion of Caledonia, which was newly named the town of Inverness. Within the boundaries of the new county were also such part of the territory in the counties of Ontario and Genesee " as is included between the southern shore of Lake Ontario on the south, the boundary between the United States and Upper Canada on the north, the easterly line of the town of Penfield continued to the said boundary line on the east, and the westerly line of the triangle continued to the said boundary line on the west." Commissioners were appointed to determine the proper site or sites tor u court house and gaul to he erected in the county of Monroe. A Court of Common Pleas and a Court of General Sessions were established and terms of said courts were provided for. One member of Assembly was apportioned to the new county. Elisha Ely and Levi Ward, Jr.," of the town of Briohton," and James Seymour, " of the town of Clarkson," were appointed commissioners to superintend the building of the court-house and gaol, and two assessments of five thousand dollars each were authorized to be collected for the expenses of the erection of the count\- buildings and for the contingent expenses of the county. The council of appointment, in whom the power of naming the county officers was vested, on .March 5, 1821, appointed Elisha B. Strong as the First Judge of the Court of Common Pleas, Timothy Childs as District Attorney, and Nathaniel Rochester as county clerk ; on March 7th James Seymour was appointed sheriff, and on March loth Elisha Ely received his commission as surrogate. At the election of the same year Nathaniel Rochester was elected the first member of Assembly from the new county, and he satin the Legislature of 1822 ; in November, 1822, Elisha Ely was appointed county clerk in his place, and March 28, 1823, Orrin E. Gibbs was appointed surrogate in the place of Mr. Ely. The First Court House HE onl_\- further question to be settled after the passage of the bill was that of the site of the count\- buildings. It appears that three lots were offered to the commissioners : One, the lot now occupied by the Court House in this city, the two others on the cast side of the river, one being a part of Enos Stone's garden, and another a lot on North St. Paul street. The court-house lot (which was finally accepted) was argued to be the best site for the purpose, for a number of reasons which were comparisons of the cast and west sides of the river. The lot was sold by Messrs. Rochester, Carroll, and Fitzhugh for one dollar to the Board of Supervisors, by an indenture made May 24, 1 82 1, and a clause in the deed required that the land should forever be occupied by the Board of Supervisors or their successors. The lot had a frontage of one hundred and sixty-six feet on Main street, and two hundred and sixty-four feet on Fitzhugh street. The corner-stone of the first Court House was laid in the presence of Governor De Witt Clinton, and Lieutenant-Governor Taylor, with imposing ceremonies on the first day of December, 1821. VINCENT AND SELAH MATHEWS" LAW OFFICE. FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH. FIRST MONROE COUNTY COURT HOUSE BUILT 1821. COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE. ST. LUKE'S CHURCH. HIGH SCHOOL. The Court House building was fifty-four feet long, forty-four wide, and forty high. It presented two fronts, one facing Court square, showing two stories and a base — the other towards Buffalo, now Main street, two stories and a full basement. Each front was furnished with a projecting portico, thirty feet long and ten wide, supported by four fluted Ionic columns, surmounted by a regular entabluture and balustrade, which returned and continued along the whole front. From the center of the building arose an octagonal belfry, covered by a cupola. The court-room was on the second story, extending the entire length and breadth of the building. The total cost of the first court-house did not exceed $7500. The Second Court House S the country expanded and became populous, and Rochester arose to the dignity of a large and thriving city in the heart of then the most fertile region of the United States, the need for a new court-house became more and more evident with each succeeding year, until in i848-'49 the agitation assumed such proportions that the Board of Supervisors on March 27, 1850, resolved to unite with the city in the erection of a building for their joint use. Work was at once begun, and the corner-stone was laid on June 20, 1850, an immense gathering for those days witnessing the ceremonies. The second court-house was erected at a st of nearly $60,000. SECOND MONROE COUNTY COURT HOUSE. The New Court House HI1,E the second court-house was a noble buildina in its day, it became apparent a decade since that it was not adequate for the transaction of the rapidly-increasing business of Monroe County. It was demonstrated several years before the building was razed that the sanitary condition was poor. Then, too, there were no elevators and not enough court-rooms. The agitation for a new court house was begun in 1890, but it was not until February, 1893, that the Board of Supervisors took up the matter by resolving that it was advisable to have a new tire-proof court-house. The Board met in special session in March of that year and it was determined to build on the present site. Messrs. Otis, Goss, Starkweather, Pratt, Armstrong, Oberlies, Englehardt, Gottschalk, Beebe, and Gallup were elected as the committee which should have charge of the building. At another special session in June, J. Foster Warner of this city was chosen architect. The corner-stone was laid on July 4, 1894, and the box contained all the articles that were enclosed in the corner-stones of the first and second court-houses. The cost of building and furnishing the new Court House was as follows : For enclosing and rooting, $295,343; interior finishing, 5339,447; steam heating and ventilating, $25,120; elevators, $8859; gas and electric fixtures, $18,000; decorating, $5273; mail chute, $975; sidewalks, $2155.75; permanent fixtures, including office furniture, $57,790.23; carpets, $8000; furniture, $21,657.88; extras on e.xterior, $1487.96; architect's fees, $20,899.80. Total cost, $805,008.62. The new building was occupied by most of the court and county officials on the first day of July, 1896. The Exterior HIS maturing period of Amt-rican art. whicli has accepted the Renaissance in architecture as Europe accepted it tour centuries ago, takes forward a mighty stride in the erection of the Monroe County Court House. As the Boston Public Library marked an f poch in the building of New England and inaugurated our public use of the French Renaissance, so this Court House marks an epoch in the building of Western New York, and inaugurates our public use of the Italian Renaissance. America is just commencing to build iTi earnest— for all time ; and her citizens are just commencing to realize of what great importance good architecture is. Architecture is the dress of a nation ; not only its dress, hut half its being. And ue who stand to-day upon the threshold of a areater national existence, and look forward to the sweeping away of our temporary utilitarian structures and a strong magnificence of buikling which will complement that existence,— must realize the important part of leadership to be played by the first great civic building, purely of the style that our civic buildings will follow. ' The Monroe County Court House is a wonderful combination of those divergent styles of the Renaissance which developed at Rome, at Florence and on the plains of Lombardy. It is neither wholly astylar, nor wholly arcaded ; it is neither a Pitti, nor a Grimani. It unites in a most rhythmical composition some of the profoundest ideas of Bramante, Burgognone, Brunelleschi, and Michelozzo. Yet it follows no one of those combinations uhich Italy herself saw in the later age of the Renaissance. It has no exact precedent for its union of ideas. Even if it had, if it adhered closely to one developed type, if it aped the very proportions and details of a precedent structure, it would still be a masterpiece in its application to modern uses and requirements. This palace of justice is divided by string-courses into three horizontal departments : the high double-basement ; the union of second and third stories under a series of heavy hood-mouldings, which arch the high recesses of the windows ; and the almost continuous arcade above. The basement, lofty, rusticaed, and projecting, gives the building its solidity, its weight, its necessary strength. These high basements are mainly a development of the Veronese school ; yet at Verona it is rare to find them double ; that is, with two courses of windows, the lower of which is upon a level with the ground. The latter idea is found exemplified in Bramante's great work, the Palazzo della Cancellaria at Rome. There we see these same deep, rectangular sub-basement windows, placed directly under the higher apertures ; though they have not double-lights, and a small string-course surmounts them. The higher windows here are unique. Their deep reces^ses, square, heavy dividing-piers instead of columns, and entire lack of moulding, cornice, or pediment— partake, save for the consoles, of the most rigid purity of the Renaissance. The strong effect obtained by their proportion of openings to the solid, makes this basement thorougly astylar, in spite of the portico. The rustica, though proceeding like all rustica from Florence, is seen chiefly at Rome. Its lightness, obtained by channeling the edges of the stones upon one side only and giving therefore a horizontal effect, is somewhat rare in a first story. Its best example is found in another of Bramante's Roman structures, the Palazzo Torlonia. The architect is most daring in his treatment of the doorway ; tor this portico of detached columns upholding a balcony is more of a pure Greek revival, supposedly incongruous to the astylar renaissance ; without the most dexterous management it would utterly destroy all the effect gained by the fine proportion of lights and shadows. Yet it has prototypes. A prominent one is that upon the Palazzo N'erospi at Rome, a work of Onorio Lunghi's. The Verospi, like most astylar palaces, has one doorway; the Court House has three. But these large openings in the lower part of the facade are carefully proportioned to the extent of wall above and upon each side. It is the upper part of the Rochester palace which contains the main theme. The basement, lofty and imposing as it is, combining as it does exquisite ideas from the Cancellaria, the Torlonia, and the Verospi, is only a foundation. From it mount the two-story window-recesses to that magnificent sweep of moulding-arches, over whose swelling tops trips lightly and gracefully one of the sweetest arcades that ever drew inspiration from Italy. This Florentine superstructure stands upon its grim Roman foundation in a union of commanding strength and easy, brilliant beauty. To combine these qualities of power and grace in one building is the supreme test of architectural genius. Raskin says that it has been perfectly accomplished only once, in the Campanile of Giotto. And just so in the world of sculpture has it been perfectly accomplished only once, in the Hercules of Pompeii. In the Court House the blending of these antagonistic forces has been brought about by the most daring superimposition of the arcaded renaissance upon the astylar, of lightness upon heaviness, of grace and movement upon rigidity. Yet this has been done with such skill that there is not a clash, not a discordant note. The facade of this extraordinary building mounts toward heaven with the felicitous, imperceptible gradation of color in a peachblow vase. Beginning with ponderosity and rigidity it merges, as it climbs, into smiling severity — into beaming grandeur — into happy, riotous magnificence — into sweetest, airiest grace. And yet it does not appear to taper or to be unduly fragile at the top; for a cornicione surmounts the whole whose width and device are so cunningly calculated that it preserves the equilibrium, satisfies the severity, and does not detract from the elegance. The ideas which meet to form this superstructure are drawn from Florence, Venice, and Pavia ; but they are so uniquely commingled that the work might almost be called entirely original. There is no palace in Italy which presents a similar facade. The real merging from the astylar to the arcaded, which is accomplished by placing the second-story windows in the same recess with the third-story ones and covering them with the same hood-moulding, is a fine piece of designing. The lesser depth of these recesses in comparison with those of the basement, and the panelling under the third-story windows, are the gradual steps from heaviness to lightness. The use of the broad hood-moulding to cover the windows of two stories, forming a series of arches which stride imposingly along from one great columnar recess to another, is the principal feature of the facade, giving it that amiable dignity and that smiling serenity. However, this is nothing new, even in respect to the double-story idea. The hood-moulding covering two round-headed windows separated by a column or pier, was ne of the earliest developments of the Renaissance. We find it at Florence in Michelozzo's Palazzo Riccardi, and Alberti's Palazzo Rucellai. it became in the hands of the Cinquecentists one of their most effective instruments for obtaining a pleasant strength. But the idea of surmounting a course of such double-light windows and hood-mouldings with a light arcade is very rare. It is the execution of this idea that has made the Monroe County Court House what it is ; the arcade has given it its grace, its lightness, its culminat- ing beauty. And this idea has come from its principal exponent, the Certosa di Pavia. In the western facade of the Certosa di Pavia — that marvelous Carthusian monastery which under the genius of Burgognone became the supreme creation of the Cinquecentists — we find the same broad hood-moulding covering two r<;iund-headed windows separated by a column, the panelling immediately under the windows in the same recess, the disc ornamentation in the lunette, and the light, surmounting arcade of small arches and half-columns. The special effect there is as delightful as it is in the Court House. But they are only incidents there, in a vast facade, undermined by fragile composition and delicate adornment, and have not the strong foundation which the Court House gives to enhance their general effect. The details differ somewhat in the two compositions ; but the idea is identical. The Rochester architect showed his genius in seizing a thought executed but in fragment and applying it with such success on a broad scale. It is the balconies, together with the versified arrangement of the windows in the center of the facade, which give the Court House its play, its relapse from the rigidity of its basement and the tiresomeness of an oft-recurring design. It is a very happy idea, this grouping of the central windows in one recess, leaving on each side a single-window recess to taper contrastingly away. But for this the facade would be nearly as immobile and staring as a whitewashed wall. In the entablature of the Court House the designer was confronted with an unusual and most difficult problem, as before mentioned. A cornicione had to be provided heavy enough for the height of the building, with projection enough to complement its sternness of tone and give play of light and shadow to the white level facade, and yet delicate enough to avoid crushing the sense of elegance which matures in the arcade. The architect has had wonderful success. By a light Doric frieze, a simple ball-and-block moulding, and a bare corona without modillions upon which is entailed most all of the projection, his object has been attained. That is indeed genius. It is unavoidable that to the observer glancing from rich arcade to severe frieze there comes a slight feeling of chilly disappointment ; this special sense had to be allowed, for the whole effect. It is unavoidable that to the observer viewing from the middle distance the cornice should appear slightlv inadequate to the building's preeminent strength and assertion ; this defect had to be endured for the sake of the sense of grace which will capture that observer the instant he approaches. The beauty of the Court House is very lavish. Not a dozen important palaces in Italy ha\e the design and material of their facades carried around upon all four sides; every face of this palace is just as perfect as the main one. The very size of the huge granite blocks is generous, and contributes mightilv to the general effect; there is imperialism in the very careful selection and cutting of these blocks. And with all, the Court House is so pure. There is not the slightest putting-forward of a facade as a facade; there is not the slightest covering up of inequalities, stufifmg of deficiencies, falsity or pretense. The interior is what the exterior announces it to be. The Monroe County Court House, as far as its e.xterior is concerned, at least, can be said to strike the keynote of American architecture of the future. Recalling to us vividly the spirit of Bramante, Michelozzo, and Burgognone, it stands to-day, in this new world, surpassed in purit\' of lines by few of the palaces of Ital Iv. The Interior N the interior of the Court House the designer was confronted with greater difficulties than in the exterior. To build a civic structure in our modern fashion of steel frame intermixed with masonry, that will entirely fulfill its purpose, without regard to st_\-le or beauty, is not troublesome. To build such a structure in one un\-arying style is quite troublesome. But to build such a structure in a style of the middle ages that arose from crowded space and disturbed civilization, is exceedingly troublesome. The stern necessity existed, however, that the interior of this building should conform to the exterior. With an Italian Renaissance facade wc must have Italian Renaissance halls. The idea must be carried out in space, in arrangement, in finish. This was the task devolved upon the architect, if he would not render the exterior an empty shell of beauty. In its entirety, this task was impossible. The architect did not have at his disposal space enough to provide those dimensions for apartments which the Renaissance demands. He had to house in this building as many human beings as would occupy a dozen palaces in Florence or Bologna. Halls, courts, and chambers had to be cramped, and no room could be allowed even to extend through two stories in height. With all this serious disadvantage, the architect has produced a wonderful work. He has succeeded in completely disguising the imn frame-work of the building; and he has atoned for smallness of dimension and comparati\e lowness of ceiling by a profusion of fine detail, which is neither too elaborate, nor too abundant. The classic idea has been quite thoroughl>' carried out; there is seldom a defection or a discordant note. of And he has given us one masterpiece. For the first time in America a many-arcaded Italian courtyard, tiiough roofed, is produced, Italian elements. In the center of the Court House lies a marvelous cortile thirty-four feet square, arcaded on four sides, and opening clear to the roof, nearly one hundred feet above. This is the supreme note of the building; and it will always be a pride to American architecture. As one passes between the great pillars of the main entrance to the Court House he finds himself instantly in a charmed land — the land of Sangallo, Sansovino, and Sammicheli. He stands in a wide vestibule which is resplendent with fine marbles, and overhung by a beautiful coffered ceiling. A wide stairway with golden arms leads the eye imposingly through a sweep of five golden arches at its top, and directs it to the mighty columns and entablature of the cortile glittering far away, through the darker entrance hall, in the sun-light. One finds himself, not only in Italy, but specifically in Genoa. A Gen- oese tone is at once visible in this vestibule, which is followed throughout the building. In that fair city, "La Superba," whose white bosom rises steeply from the crescent bay upon encircling hills, the palace- builders of the Renaissance found special conditions, and adapted rules to fit them. The streets were narrow and the limited ground sloped ; effect could not be obtained in the beauty of the facade, since it could not be seen ; and space could not be spared for an imposing court. So the builders enlarged and beautified the \estibule and the staircase, which had been hitherto neglected. The Court House, like a Genoese palace, lies on a side hill, and is confined to certain limits. And the grand entrance staircase sweeps up from a spacious vestibule to the courtyard on the main fioor. The vestibule itself is most worthy of attention. It is truly of Genoa. It reminds one forcibly of the entrance hall to the Palazzo dell' Universita upon that famous street of palaces which tops the bay. There the stairway leads up from the spacious vestibule to a court-yard of larger dimensions than that of the Court House ; but the view as seen from the entrance through the arcades of the cortile is quite similar. In the Court House the three great entrance arches lie behind, letting in a flood of sunshine; the smaller arcade of five arches in front gleams vellow of Siena marble, with doors of Cuban mahogany — which very fine wood is used for finishing throughout the building. The walls upon the right and left are panelled to the height of twenty feet with Siena marble and Pavonasso. The Siena as wainscoting extends to a height of eight feet. Above that Pavonasso is panelled within Pavonasso, and in the center of each wall is a bronze plate with IN THE VESTIBULE. inscriptious having reference to the ground on which the Court House stands, and to the erection of the present building. The staircase leads up ten steps of Tennessee marble, with solid railini;s of Siena, in the center of this vestibule. The arcade of five arches, at its top, is tilled with three pairs of swinging doors in the center, and a window at each end. Right and left of the stairway lead down other stairways to the base- ment, the side walls of which are panelled in Siena, and the lintels above upheld by tine Siena consoles. This feature is not strictly Italian, but it d(ies not detract from the general effect. Next to the cortile, the coffering ma\- be considered the finest point of the Court House. The design in this vestibule, like all the others, is not only pure Italian Renaissance, but is that in its latest and richest development, as it is found, again, in the palaces of Genoa. It is highly relieved and of a soft cream color. A long panel with curved ends occupies its center, enclosing a rich rosette. The huge lamps which stand upon the railings of the stairway are to be carefully noticed. They stand seven feet high, upon large pedestals, and are taken from the common form of Renaissance candelabra in the churches of Italy. They do not reach the rococoism or richness of many of the later period, but are exceedingly graceful and delicately adorned with relief work. The electric light fixtures upon the side walls are also to be noticed. They are taken from a \ery fine and oft-recurring design for lamps in the hallways and by the entrance-doors of sixteenth-century palaces; and as here used are in admirable harmony with the architecture. Passing through the arcade into the hallway, we stand before entering the court between the handsome doorways of the Monroe County Clerk's office on the right, and the Monroe County Treasurer's office on the left. Before us are the elevator shafts encased in iron-work of very fine design, and the staircases of the court curved out to right and left. The ceiling of this hall is nearly as fine as that of the vestibule. Its main effect is a large central circle with a delicate rosette, surrounded by relief-work of flowery design, and its color, like that of the vestibule, is of cream. The design of the doorways at each side leading into the offices is of the purest Renaissance, and is very happily maintained throughout the building. The idea is Vignola's, and is used by him in the Palazzo della Cancellaria at Rome, and elsewhere. Long, and rather thin consoles support a simple cornice ; and the sole decoration beneath is a moulding of dentils. A very great task has been accomplished in harmonizing the design of the iron-work, which is here so evident, with the classic tone of the architecture. Neither too flowing, nor too severe, it produces a rich ELECTRIC LAMP m VESTIBULE. U. S. MAIL CHUTE AND BOX IN MAIN CORRIDOR. and dignified effect. But now, before entering tlie rooms on the side- of the hall, let us advance at once to the supreme part of the building, the courtyard. As a stranger passes between the iron stairways curving to right and left, and stands for the first time in the court, he is over- whelmed with sensations of beauty and grandeur. Arcades tower over him on all sides, tier upon tier, soaring to a great cream-colored dome far above, with the blue sky in its center. Joined to the rhythm of the curving arches is an all-pervading lightness and happiness of color, not glaring, but soft and glamorous. This sweetness of tone seems to lift higher the impending arcades, yet prevents any crush- ing sensation from descending upon the spectator. Withall, there is much power in the boldness of the large columns above, and the sweeping lines of their huge connecting arches. The fact that the court is not open, but covered with a skylight, does not seem to detract at all from the sensations it inspires, or to give it any air of unreality. One remains transfixed at the beautiful embellishment of the dome beneath the skylight, at the extraordinary heiglit at which (considering one's impression of the exterior) it seems to be suspended, at the delicate grace of the double arcade of the fourth story, which tapers off, as it were, from the heavier work below, and at the absolute harmony of lines of the whole structure. In addition to the grace, one is possessed with a sense of great richness of material and design. The Siena marble on the ground floor, and the blue-veined Pavonasso columns above, gleam precious to the eye; the cream-colored plaster cornices and relief-work, and the panelled ceilings of the successive promenades, shower down their splendid lines in a profusion of elegance. To the spectator thus gazing upward, this court may at first seem quite large. It is not so, either in respect to the size of the building, or with regard to the courtyards of the Italian Renaissance which till the cities of Italy. But it is large, considering all the accommodations the architect was obliged to provide, which left him so little space at his disposal. The wonder is, that, after laying off wide promenades on four sides of the court, it was left not much smaller than it is. But if not broad, it is thoroughly Italian. If not a corti/e like that of the Farnese, the Cancellaria, or the Palace of the Doges, it is certainly a cortile like many of those that are found upon the steep hills of Siena, Perugia, and Genoa. Here again we strike this Genoese tone in the Court House. The comparatively small breadth, the unusual height, the wealth of material, and the elaboration of detail, all remind one of the school of Galeazzo Alessi. But when one looks at the skylight and indulges in the feeling that this is really more of a hall than a courtyard, he is also reminded of the Italian courts as first introduced into England, and roofed over, by Sir Charles Barry. Such a decidedly interior court as this is usualK' more of a iiiey{0 tenniiic between the facade and the rooms than the numerous great cortili of Rome, and Lombardy, which lie open at one side. Still the architect may incline at pleasure either to the lines of the facade or the details of the apartments. The English who followed upon the work of Sir Charles Barry, in pursuance of this rule, soon merged their roofed Italian courts into mere lofty halls with no outdoor suggestion. These English-Italian halls, the only real precedent for our roofed cortile, the architect of the Court House has not seen fit to follow. He has done far, far better in going directl\- hack to the pure Italian outdoor courtyard, in disregard of the e.xistence of the skylight. This cortile is unusually lofty for a palace of the Italian Renaissance ; there are many cortili of four stories in height, but hardl>- a one where those four stories are all arcaded. The usual practice was to top two ordonnances of arcades with a flat wall and small windows, as in the Cancellaria at Rome. The latter is considered by many the most beautiful cortile of the Renaissance ; but it is very fortunate that its design was not followed in the Court House, on account of our courtyard's small extent. Its idea of lightness in columns and arches is adhered to in our topmost arcade. There, in addition to the slight grace of the arcade, is the solid parapet running from, pedestal to pedestal, which Bramante so steadfastly used, not only in the Cancellaria, but also in the Cortile of San Domaso at the Vatican. And it is the latter courtyard, by the way, that, to one gazing down from its Loggia of Raphael, gives the same sensation of interior arcaded height that is found in the Court House. The lack of arches in the first story of the cortile may at first appear to some incongruous. But it is good Renaissance. This use of heavy columns and pilasters to uphold an entablature on the ground tloor of a court, is found in many Italian palaces. Its effect in the Court House is quite similar to that in the Palazzo Massimi at Rome, by Peruzzi, save that in the latter there is no arcade above. As soon as we look more particularly at the first arcade, we notice as peculiar the great width of the arches, the bold heaviness of THE CORTILE FROM THE SECOND FLOOR. the columns, and the want of pedestals tor tlie latter. The columns are appropriately smaller than those of the first story ; in this they obey the first law of superimposed ordonnances ; but they still appear somewhat lar*^**^' IN «g^ "WH*!*^ ::, ^ K ^v*f C'-. ^fp^icA": 131 W. IS!? 5T. NEW YORK THE ENTIRE PAPIER MACHE, CARTON PIERRE AND ORNAMENTAL PLASTER WORK OF THE NEW MONROE COUNTY COURT HOUSE WAS MODELED. CAST, AND SET BY MESSRS. JAMES T. HALL & CO., OF NEW YORK. KING'S WINDSOR Asbestos Cement and Cement Dry Mortar, I Both for Plastering Walls and Ceilings, The former to be used with sand. The latter (being already mixed with sand) requires but the addition of water. B. KING & CO., 2J-24 State Street, New York, N. Y. SOLE PATENTEES AND MANUFACTURERS, ^ Ji The practical testimony of the great merits and appreciation of our WINDSOR CEMENT is, that leading architects throughout the country have called for it on their best and most costly structures, while architects generally have specified it for all kinds and grades of buildings, expensive and inexpensive, as extra cost does not debar its use on even the humblest cottage. Millions of barrels of it have been used within the last three years. We inipro\-e this opportunitv to tender our thanks to all patrons, and to invite all Architects evervuhere to send for our complete treatise on the subject of "NEEDED IMPROVEMENT IN PLASTER FOR WALLS AND CEILINGS," and also for our "PRACTICAL EVIDENCE OF SUPERIORITY," an octavo pamphlet of 56 pages, containing about three thousand of the buildings on which our material has been used — the buildings being classified and indexed as follows: Office, Insurance, and Bank Buildings. Hospitals, Asylums, Sanitariums. Etc. Colleges, Seminaries, Libraries, Laboratories, Etc. Public School Buildings. Churches and Rectories. Young Men's and Young Women's Christian Association and Woman's Christian Temperance Union Buildings. Masonic Temples, Etc. Federal, State, County, and Town Buildings. Theatres, Opera Houses, Halls, Etc. Hotels. Apartment Hotels, Apartment Houses, and Flats. Business Buildings, Stores, Blocks, Etc. Railroad Depots and Stations. Mills, Factories. Breweries, Etc. Miscellaneous Buildings. Residences. The New Court House of .^ Monroe County, New York. After careful investigation it was decided to adopt for the heating and power required in the building, the well-known Babcock & Wilcox water-tube boilers. « These boilers have a world-wide reputation for safety and economy, and are in use in every country on the globe. Some idea of the extent to which these ..Ty>« i *^ boilers are used can be gathered from the fact that about 1,500,000 horse-power are now in actual service, representing an investment in round figures of thirty millions of dollars. There are three boilers of 100 horse-power each in the installation. The water in these boilers is subdivided so that the quantity contained in any one section is so small as to render impossible a disruptive explosion. The cut shows the general construction by which this division of contents is effected. Citv <•! New HE " F. O. Norton" cement used in the Court House of Monroe County has an unusual record as being the leading high-class cement among the various brands adopted for building purposes throughout the country. Other structures erected with it are the Brooklyn Bridge, the engineer of which says i The " Norton ' cement was selected at a higher price than others on account of superior quality, and the entire weight ot the tower rests upon it." Beside this vast work, the Madison Square Garden, New York, is built entirely with the " F. O. Norton" cement. The Equitable Life Insurance Company's Building. New York ; St. Luke's Hospital. New York, (new build- ing) and almost every bank structure erected during the past ten years in the Voric are erected with this famous cement, it having been called for by the archi- tects and often chosen by the better class of builders who secure work of the foregoing class. It is often asked why the " Norton '" cement lias gained such notoriety and the answer is the fact that experience has proved it of unvarying uniformity and possessing all the re- quisites for the high tests exacted by engineers and architects. Only the best selected rock is used in its manufacture and the .greatest attention is given to fender the burning and grinding of the clinker absolutely uniform. In the preparation of the foundation mass for the Bartholdi Statue of Liberty. General Charles P. Stone. C. E.. who had the matter in charge, gave the following interesting results: " A cube of * Norton ' cement. 12x12x12 inches, i part cement. ! jiart sand, 7 part.s broken stone, yielded under pressure at the end of six months' setting at 5N 53-100 tons, at the end of twenty-seven months at 97 55-100 tons, at the end of twenty-eight months at 104 24-100 tons." When it is considered that the estimated weight per foot of the Brooklyn Bridge towers is 7 tons, the factor of safety attained by using the " F. (). Norton " cement in bridges and buildings is easily apparent. DESCRIPTION of the New Court House would perhaps be incomplete without reference to the fine cement side- walks surrounding the building. These pavements, as well as the tlooring in the basement floors, were laid by Louis G. Meyer, No. 156 Fifth A\'enue, New York and are noticeable for their neat and substantial finish, as well as for their durability. Mr. Meyer is extensively engaged as a general contractor and is in every way qualified to do every description of cement work. Side- walks, curbings, and driveways of Flintolithic, Asphalt, and Artificial Stone demand his special attention. «^ HE hardware used throughout the building is most admirably adapted to its double purpose; viz., to give the best service both in convenience and dura- bility, and to beautify and complete by its simplicity and its highU- artistic effect, the fine wood-work. The Chicago Lock is deservedly popular everywhere, and no manufacturers of builders' hardware are better equipped to do satisfactory work than the Chicago Hardware Mfg. Co., either in fine designs or in absolutely correct modern finishes. The cut on this page shows the style of hardware used, and we predict that it will prove a lasting pleasure to all observers. t^ The Snead & Co. Iron Works, Elevator Screen in wrought and ca»t-iron. finished in electro-bronze, for the Monroe County Court House. Rochester, N, Y. J. Foster Warner, Architect. LOUISVILLE, KY^ Makers of Structural and Ornamental Iron Work For Architectural Purposes* Finest Castings in Iron, Brass, Bronze, and Aluminum. Hand-Forged and Hammered Wrought-Iron Work, Etc. ELECTRO -PLATING AND BOWER - BARJTING. STRUCTURAL WORK IN CAST-IRON AND STEEL. EAUTY and proportion are considered and demanded as essential in every construction of importance ; and it is a strange anomaly to see on some of the most elaborately artistic entrances, the clumsy, awkward fixtures used for closing the doors, marring and even destrying the finest effects through utter incongruity with the sur- roundings. Utility is good, but utility combined with beauty is better. It is owing to the possession of these qualities, combined with great durability, that the Bommer Spring Hinge, manufactured by Bommer Bros., 551 and 353 Jay St.. Brooklyn. N. Y.. was adopted for the new Court House, it being gen- erally acknowledged that no part of a building is subject to closer scrutiny than the entrance, where objectionable features are promptly discovered and con- demned. Special care was taken in making this selection. ELEVATOR Supply and Repair Co., 34 and 36 West Monroe Street, CHICAGO, ILL. Manufacturers of Mechanical Floor Indicators, Armstrong: Electric Elevator Signals, Flash-Light Annunciators, Automatic Door Mechanisms for Passenger Elevators, Elevator Guide Lubricators. The most prominent buildings in the country are equipped with our devices. WRITE FOR ESTIMATES. Davidson Steam Pumps The Norris Sash Pulleys. and Hydraulic riachinery For all situations. M. T. DAVIDSON, 43=53 Keap Street, Brooklyn, N. Y. Branches : ' 133 Libertv Street. New York. I so Oliver Street. Boston. Norris Sash Pulleys are being specified by nearly all the leading Archi- tects of the couiitrv. Whenever you see a fine building rest assured that the Norris Sash Pulleys are in the frame. We cheerfully furnish .Architects catalogues, and samples free of cost. Address, The Norris Sash Pulley Co., Baltimore, Md. |UR work in the Monroe County Court House is only a sample of the class of work that we are placing in hundreds of Court Houses, City Halls, and Banks throughout the country. Many of the most prominent public buildings are fitted up with our Metallic Furni- ture, and we can give innumerable references as to the satisfaction which it affords to those using it, but why go out of Rochester for that, when the work in the Court House speaks for itself, and the officials boast that they ha\-e the finest offices in the United States. OFHCE SPECIALTY MFG. CO., 601 bOb Wilder BIdg., Rochester, N. Y. MAKERS OF LABOR-SAVING OFFICE DEVICES OF ALL KINDS. (See illustrations in this book of the County Clerk's office, the County Treasurer's office, the recording office in the Surrogate's Court, the Law Librarj-, and the Super\'isors' Clerk's office, all of which were equipped with our office furniture, i THE (]ARPETS The Contract for furnishing all the Carpets for Monroe County's New Court House was awarded to J* J* Sibley, Lindsay & Curr because they offered to supply the best ROYAL WILTONS at the lowest price. ^* j* ^ jt ^ ^ BEST CARPETS LOWEST PRICES TWO THINGS TO REMEMBER ABOUT SIBLEY, LINDSAY & CURR'S WHEN IT COMES TO CARPET BUYING. ^ ji jt Jt H E roof of the Court House is covered with the asphalt roofing materials manufactured by the Warren Chemical & Manufacturing Company, Si and 83 Fulton Street. New York, N. Y. The Warren Company are the pioneers of the asphalt business, and their Anchor Brand Natural Asphalt Roofmg has been in use for the past twenty years on many of the largest manufacturing and railroad buildings, as well as the fmest office and public buildings, throughout the United States and Can- ada. Among these we would mention the following : Allegheny County Court- house and Jail, Pittsburgh, Pa. ; Lucas County Court-house, Toledo, Ohio ; Home Savings Bank building, Detroit, Mich.; United Bank building, New York; United League Club-house, New York, and many buildings belonging to the New York Central Railroad, Boston & Albany Railroad, Pennsylvania Railroad, Wasburn & Moen Manufacturing Company, General Electric Company, etc. The Anchor Brand Roofing is applied in very much the same way as the ordinary gravel roofing, but the materials are entirely different, being composed of Trinidad natural asphalt, instead of coal tar, as in the ordinary roofing. The oils in the asphalt, being non-volatile at any natural temperature, remain in the roofing, keeping it in its original condition during an indefinite exposure to the weather, in illustration of this fact, the Warren Company have samples of their Anchor Brand Asphalt Felt and Cement that have been in actual use from fifteen to twenty years, and show no signs of deterioration, the asphalt felt being as tough and pliable, and the asphalt cement as soft and elastic, as when first applied. The Wainwright Heater Of whatewr tvpc always contains Corrugated Copper Tubes. The Court Hmise heater is a special combination, and the heater shown in the above cut is still another. We would like to tell you more about both of them. Taunton Locomotove Mfq. Co., TAUNTON, MASS. GORTON & HcCABE, Furniture, Carpets, Draperies, and Interior Decorating, « Rochester, n. y. All the Chairs and Draperies for the Court House are from our establishment. R. Q. NEWMAN, ,Tanufacturer of Snow's Celebrated White Quick Lime, Dealer in Plaster Paris, Cement, Plastering Hair, Etc. Telephone 1181. 80 Exchange Street, ROCHESTER, N. Y. The Wood Carving in the Court House was executed bv THILLMAN FABRY, Wood Carver, 48 North Water Street, ROCHESTER. N. Y. - i:5- CH L, S, CHAPIN, 90 Exchange St., ROCHESTER, N. Y. Leaded -Glass Worker Stained Ecclesiastical and Domestic Glass. SPECIAL DESIGNS. I MADE AND SET ALL THE LEADED GLASS IN THIS BUILDING. Henry Waltjen, 38 Exchange Place, ROCHESTER, N. Y. Was the Contractor for e^ Tinting - Painting The New Court House. Electric Time Clocks and Telephones Including latest up-to-date Wiring in the NEW COURT HOUSE is put up by Rudolph Schmidt & Co,, Dealers in Optical, Mathematical, Electrical, and Telegraphic Supplies ^ c*- j* IT' -J Contractors for all kinds of K = - - I %^i ELECTRIC WORK. 5t East Main Street, opposite Front Street. &© a g! fO:,|||', GRAVES ELEVATORS Latest Improvements, Finest Construction, Most Economical, Greatest Speed, Safest. Hydraulic Passenger and Freight. Electric Passenger and Freight. Patent Steel Screw Belt Passenger and Freight. Patent Spur Gear Freight, Hand and Sidewalk. * Send for Catalogue. GRAVES ELEVATOR CO., ROCHESTER, N. Y. NEW YORK 92, 94 LIBERTY STREET. BOSTON 53 STATE STREET. ATLANTA, GA. INMAN BUILDING. CHAS. VOGEL, President and Superintendent. FREDERICK S. ROGERS, Vice-President, Secretary, and Treasurer. THEODORE J. VOGEL, Assistant Superintendent. THE John Siddons Company. ^ Roofing. Copper and Galvanized Iron Cornice Works. HOWE & BASSETT, 61=63=65 North Water St. Rochester, N. Y. Jobbers in Plumbing and Steam Fitting Supplies. PLUMBING, HEATING, AND GREEN- HOUSE WORK A SPECIALTY. USE THE ELECTRIC BOILER For Heating Your House. 32 Stillson Street, Near Main, 16-18=20 Achilles Street, ROCHESTER, N. Y. J. ALBERT SIMPSON, Treasurer. Incorporated 1826. Capital $250,000. HENRY E. SHELDON, Aoent. GRANITE RAILWAY COMPANY, Principal Office, 166 DEVONSHIRE ST., BOSTON, MASS. Monumental and Building Granites Quarries at West Quincy, Mass., and Concord, N. H. Proprietors of the Railway Quarry, Quincy, Mass. To enumfrate all the Monuments and Buildings erected in \-arious parts of the country from nur Quincy and Concord Granites, would take up too much space, but we mention a few prominent ones: Monuments Erected from our Quincy Granite. Bunker Hill Monument. Charlestown district. Boston. President Arthur's monument. Brooklyn, N. Y. Pedestal of Henry Ward Beecher's monument ; Pedestal of Gen. Grant's monument in Brooklyn, and the Utica, N. Y.. soldiers' monument. ESTIMATES PROMPTLY GIVEN. Buildings Erected from our Quincy Granite. The Custom House. Boston. Mass. The old Tremont House, Boston, Mass. The Custom House, New York city. The Astor House, New York city. Agricultural Hall, New Orleans, La. The Custom House, New Orleans, La. Machine Shop and Polishing Works at West Quincy, Mass. Buildings Erected from our Concord Granite. City Hall, Horticultural Hall, and Rialto bldg., Boston : New York Life Assurance, German Sav- ings Bank, and the Staats Zeitung bldgs. in New- York city; Hartford Fire Ins. Co.'s. and Charter Oak Ins. Co.'s bldgs.. Hartford, Conn., and the Monroe County Court House, Rochester, N. Y. WORK STRICTLY FIRST=CLASS. THE 5aunders studio. ^ By Photography Portraits j:Sl„ In Carbon PORTLAND CEMENT^ .^ 'T^HE Portland Cement used in the construction of the ■^ Court House was supplied by S. B. Stuart & Co., Rochester, N. Y., agents for the Empire Portland Cement Works at Warners, N. Y. Over two thousand barrels, or four hundred tons, were furnished for this work alone. JAMES GAFFNEY. JOHN J. McGAHAN. Portraits in Water Colors. GAFFNEY & McGAHAN, STEAM AND GAS FITTERS, J 98 MiU Street, ROCHESTER, N. Y. Hot Water Heating a Speciality. Estimates Furnished. Portraits in Crayon. ^ ONLY HIGH-GRADE WORK. IRVING SAUNDERS, Manager. HE new Court House of Monroe County is equipped througliout witli the Iron-Armored Conduit System for electric lighting, manu- factured by the Interior Conduit and Insula- tion Company, general offices and works, No. 527 West 34th Street, New York City. J. L. SHEEHAN, ^^^ BRIGHTON, N. Y., FURNISHED ALL THE SAND Used in the Foundation, Stonework, Brickwork, and for Laying all the Tile and Cement Floors, and also for all Concrete Work on the top of Floor=arches in the NEW COURT HOUSE, Amounting to Over 5000 Loads. Any Architect or Builder will tell you that Sheehan's Sand is SHARP, CLEAN, and the VERY BEST to be found in Monroe County. I will Deliver to any part of Rochester. Bromley, Miller & More, CONTRACTORS FOR FURNITURE IN MONROE COUNTY COURT HOUSE J« We can Furnish the Flowers, Special Attention given to all kinds of Order Work, We always have on hand a large stock of Parlor, Library, and Office Furniture, and all kinds of Upholstered Work. We make a specialty of Fancy Cabinet Work, and odd pieces. Bromley, Miller & More, 181-187 East Main Street. SALTER BROS., Florists. 38 West Main Street, opposite the Court House, and 3 and 5 East Avenue, Liberty BIdg. The vetter desk^ HIGH-GRADE WORKMANSHIP AND FINISH. KEEPING ALWAYS ON HAND A LARGE ASSORTMENT IN ALL SIZES OF ROLLER CURTAIN DESKS, AT EX- TREMELY LOW PRICES, WE CAN SATISFY PARTIES WANTING TO INVEST ONLY A SMALL SUM IN A DESK AS WELL AS THOSE WHO ARE LOOKING FOR THE VERY BEST TO BE HAD. M j* j* M J* ^ * J* .^ j* jt ^'t ^ 9t VETTER Desk Works, 30-36 RIVER STREET, (NEAR N. Y. C. DEPOT) ROCHESTER, N.Y. High Art Photo Studio. «i$5 t^ fc^ WE EXHIBIT THE VERY LATEST IN HIGH ART PORTRAITURE, viz.:.'*.'*.* CARBON, IN DIFFERENT TINTS, ^ MONO -TINT PLATINUM, BLACK AND SEPIA, m PASTEL and WATER COLOR, OT TR PART ORS ^^^ ^^^ ™°^* convenient, our Gallery is the best equipped, and ^ ^'^ especially designed to meet the latest demands in Photographic Art. The result is first-class work in the most artistic style. LIBERTY BUILDING. COR. EAST AVE. AND MAIN ST. J. E. Mock. In our '96 Model Humming Bird Bicycle we have embodied the essential fea- tures necessary to the production of a first-class^ high-grade bicycle. We are manufacturers of four years' experience. Your inspection and patronage are respectfully solicited. BETTYS & MABBETT CO., Salesroom : 34 East Avenue, Rochester, N. Y. Easy Running ^ ^ ^ Superb Workmanship Ride a Humming Bird Bicycle and be happy* BETTYS & MABBETT CO., Salesroom s 34 East Avenue, Rochester, N. Y. Strong and Durable -jc Correct Lines ^ -^^ -.^ Our Specialties .j: Handsomest Register Made Furniture to Order, Choice Articles in Vernis-Martin Decorations and Marquetry, Beautiful Tapestries, Hair Mattresses to Order and First-CIass Live Geese Feathers. ^^^^♦S?^ ^ \ STALLKNIGHT & SCHMINKE, I37-I39-I4J East Main St. opposite Sibley, Lindsay & Curr's. NEW WALL REGISTER, ORNAMENTED WITH ENAMELED EMBOSSED TILE. ■.•< .•« SIMILAR ARTICLE FOR FLOORS. ■.•* ■* -.^ RIVES & CO., ROCHESTER, N. Y. New^ Catalogue has colored illustrations. Security Trust Co., Granite Building, Rochester, N. Y. After January ist, IS97, at our own New Building:, cor. East Main and South Water Sts. ^ ^f§^^k?^^^^)'y^l^ ' <^'^^M ^ Capital, = = = Stockholders' Additional Liability, Surplus, = = = $2(XK00() 200,(KM) 150,000 EDWARD HARRIS, president. JAMES S. WATSON, ist vice-pres. WILLIAM L. MERCER, secretary. ALEX. M. LINDSAY, 2D vice-pres. FRANK M. FlLERY, ASSrsT. secy. HARRIS & HARRIS, counsel. WILLIAM H.WARD, suPT. of VAULTS. EDWARD HARRIS HIRAM W. SIBLEY. BENJ. E. CHASE. THOS. W. FINUCANE, ALEX. W. LINDSAY JAMES S. WATSON. OILMAN H. PERKINS, EUGENE H. SATTERLEE, TRUSTEES. J. LEE JUDSON. RUFUS K. DRYER ALBERT H. HARRIS, ERICKSON PERKINS WILLIAM L. MERCER. RUFUS A. SIBLEY, JULIUS M. WILE, FRED P. ALLEN. GILBERT BRADY, WM. E. WERNER, J. ALEX. HAYDEN, GRANGER A. HOLLISTER, C. WALTER SMITH, JOSEPH T. ALLING. E. S. ETTENHEIMER, GEORGE WILDER. This Company is authorized to act as Executor, Trustee, Admiuistrator. or Assignee. Transacts a General Banking Bn.siness and .solicits the accounts of firms and individuals. Allows interest on deposits. Loans money on bond and mortgage and approved .securities. I.s a legal depository for court and trust funds by appointment of the Comptroller of the State of New York. Al.so has been designated by Superintendent of Banking Department of the State of New York as Depository for Reserve Fund.s of State Hanks. Acts as Registrar and Transfer Agent of Stocks and Bonds. Draws bills of exchange on New York City and all the principal cities of Europe, and issues letters of credit to travelers. Safe Deposit Boxes rented In New Burg/ar-Proof Vault. Prices, $5.00 to $40.00 per year. Silverwear, Boxes, and Trunks, contain' ing valuables, received for safe-keeping. Moderate charges. iiiiilliilifiiiii! Jiiiili LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 014 205 438 3