(ilass Book_ COPYRIGHT DEPOSIT HISTORY OF INDIANA INDIANA TERRITORY, ISOO, By E. V. SHOCKLEY A HISTORY OF INDIANA FROM ITS EXPLORATION TO 1850 LOGAN ESAREY, Ph. D. 'I Instructor in Western History in Indiana University W. K. STEWART CO. INDIANAPOLIS 1915 Copyright, 1915 BY LOGAN ESAREY MAR iOi9!5 ^CI,A393931 PREFACE IN the preparation of this book several unexpected ob- stacles have been met. In the first place many traditional stories popularly regarded as substantial history have been found to be without historical foundation. In the second place there is no considerable collection of historical mate- rial to draw upon. Other States have published their docu- mentary materials and thus made them available to his- torians, but that work remains to be done in Indiana. In the third place many of the State publications have been found, after close study, to be unreliable, others are bound without indexes, tables of contents, or even continuous pag- ination. In many cases it is necessary to turn through a record, page by page, to find any desired information. These conditions have made it necessary to found every ma- terial statement on a primary source. Such work is slow and very tedious. Indiana University, October 30, 1914. CONTENTS CHAPTER I THE FRENCH IN INDIANA 1 The Jesuits Plan a Nation of Christian Indians 1 2 The Fur Traders 3 3 Louis XIV and the Mississippi Valley. __ 8 4 The Miami Indians 10 5 The First Settlements in Indiana 14 6 The French Settlers 22 CHAPTER II THE ENGLISH PERIOD, 1764-1779 28 7 English Conquest and Government 28 8 PoNTiAc's War 31 9 The Journey of George Croghan 37 10 England Takes Possession and Organizes the Country 40 CHAPTER III THE CONQUEST BY VIRGINIA, 1778-1779 47 11 The American Revolution and the In- dians 47 12 The Capture of Kaskaskia 48 13 Pierre Gibault and the Capture of Vin- CENNES 52 14 The Last Capture of Vincennes 59 15 Civil Government Under Virginia 67 CHAPTER IV CLOSING CAMPAIGNS OF THE REVOLUTION 70 16 Indians of Indiana 70 17 Last Stage of the Revolutionary War in the West 78 18 The Indians Become the Wards of the United States 89 vi TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER V INDIAN WARS, 1790-1796 92 19 The Struggle for the Ohio River Boun- dary 92 20 The Conquest of the Miamis 104 21 A Year of Negotiations and the End of the War 120 CHAPTER VI GOVERNMENT OF THE NORTH- WEST TERRITORY 126 22 Organization of the Northwest Terri- tory 126 23 The Government at Marietta 130 24 Vincennes Land Claims 132 25 Indiana a Part of Knox County 137 26 Government Under the Judges 138 27 Civil Government of the Northwest Territory 142 28 Harrison in Congress 151 CHAPTER Vll INDIANA TERRITORY, 1800-1816 154 29 Organization of Indiana Territory 154 30 Indiana Made a Territory of the Second Grade 159 31 The Territorial Legislature 169 32 Aaron Burr's Conspiracy 177 33 Development of the Territory 178 CHAPTER VIII INDIANA AND THE WAR OF 1812 181 34 After the Treaty of Greenville 181 35 Tippecanoe 186 36 Indian Wars of the Frontier 190 37 Life on the Frontier 198 CHAPTER IX FROM TERRITORY TO STATE, 1813-1816 203 38 New Settlements 203 39 Removal of the Territorial Capital to Corydon, 1813 210 TABLE OF CONTENTS vii 40 The Enabling Act 213 41 The Constitutional Convention of 1816_ 217 CHAPTER X THE STATE GOVERNMENT AT CORYDON, 1816-1825 222 42 The New Constitution in Operation 222 43 The Indians 228 44 First State Bank and the Ohio Falls Canal 233 45 Moving the Capital to Indianapolis, 1825 237 46 Settlement of the New Purchase 239 47 Social and Political Organization 248 CHAPTER XI ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, 1825-1835 254 48 Early Roads 254 49 The Michigan Road 257 50 Stage Lines 261 51 Opening the Streams to Navigation 263 52 The Flatboat Trade 269 53 Early Mail Service 272 54 Settlement of the Wabash Country 273 CHAPTER XII RELIGION AND EDUCATION IN EARLY INDIANA 279 55 Churches 279 56 Education 289 CHAPTER XIII POLITICS FROM 1825 TO 1840__ 296 57 The Jacksonian Party 296 58 The Internal Improvement Party 304 59 The Harrison Campaigns 311 CHAPTER XIV REMOVAL OF THE INDIANS FROM THE STATE 323 60 The Treaty Grounds 323 61 Black Hawk's War, 1832 325 62 Removal of the Miamis and Pottawat- TOMIES 332 viii TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER XV THE PUBLIC LANDS IN IN- DIANA 340 63 The Survey, Its Methods and Area 340 64 Land Offices 342 65 Land Sales 344 CHAPTER XVI SYSTEMATIC INTERNAL IM- PROVEMENTS 352 66 The Problem, the People, and the Legis- lature 352 67 The Wabash and Erie Canal 355 68 The System of 1836 360 69 Construction of Canals and Roads 366 70 The Settlement With the Creditors 378 71 Finishing the Wabash and Erie Canal__ 385 CHAPTER XVII THE SECOND BANK OF IN- DIANA 394 72 Chartering the Bank in 1834 394 73 Organization and Policy of the Bank 399 74 The Panic of 1837 403 75 The Era of Free Banks 408 76 Bank of the State of Indiana — The Third State Bank, 1855-1865 413 CHAPTER XVIII THE PIONEERS AND THEIR SOCIAL LIFE 418 77 The People 418 78 Home Life and Customs 421 79 Occupations 424 80 The First Public Utilities 428 81 Festivals and Festivities 429 82 Sickness and Physicians 432 83 State Charities 435 CHAPTER XIX THE MEXICAN WAR 438 84 Texas and Oregon Questions 438 85 Indiana Militia in 1846 439 TABLE OF CONTENTS ix 86 Organizing the Indiana Brigade 441 87 Campaigning in Mexico 445 CHAPTER XX THE CONSTITUTIONAL CON- VENTION OF 1850 450 88 Early Agitation for Revision 450 89 Organizing the Convention 454 90 Politics of the Convention 456 91 The New Constitution 459 CHAPTER XXI POLITICS FROM 1840 TO 1852__ 462 92 A Bankrupt State 462 93 Campaign of 1844 466 94 Political Demoralization 475 95 Free Soilers in Indiana, 1846 to 1850 477 96 The Last Struggle of the Whig Party, 1852 484 BIBLIOGRAPHY 491 INDEX 503 MAPS 1 Indiana Territory, 1800 Frontispiece 2 The French Explorers 13 3 Indiana Counties, 1814 33 4 Expedition of Clark 57 5 Proposed Divisions of the Northwest Terri- tory 75 6 The Northwest Territory, 1795 99 7 Indiana Territory, 1812 211 8 The Indians 241 9 Rivers and Streams of Indiana 267 10 Indiana in 1822 301 11 Indian Cessions 329 12 Land Surveys 345 13 Internal Improvements 355 14 Indiana in 1833 401 15 Indiana in 1852 467 A HISTORY OF INDIANA CHAPTER I the french in indiana, 1634-1763 § 1 The Jesuits Plan a Nation of Christian Indians The first account of the extensive plains and prairies south of the Great Lakes was given to the world by the Jesuit missionaries to the Huron Indians. The history of Indiana may well begin by recounting the plans of these early Jesuits for forming a Christian Indian nation around the Great Lakes. Inhabiting the Canadian peninsula extending down be- tween Lakes Huron and Erie and Ontario was an Indian population of from ten to twelve thousand souls. Along the southern shores of the lakes from Erie to the Mississippi river were situated numerous tribes more or less related to those in Canada ; so that within easy reach of Lake Huron, Lake Michigan, and Lake Superior there were not fewer than twenty-five thousand Indians. The Jesuits were the most advanced thinkers of that day. What visions they had of ideal government among this unspoiled Indian folk can- not be known. At one time they spoke of commerce and the expansion of France. At another, they expressed their view that if France was to become the ruler of this vast country and its simple folk, the seeds of French culture and patriotism should be implanted in the savage breast. In other letters they indulged the true Jesuit spirit that the church must outweigh the state in the hearts of the new people. At still other times they lamented the internal wars of the tribesmen and breathed a hope to see all of it disap- 2 HISTORY OF INDIANA pear in an all-consuming love of God and the king. In vis- ion they saw the red men thoroughly Gallicized, imbued with French culture and patriotism, armed and officered by the French government, carrying the lilies of France in triumph over a continent won for civilization, the church, and the king. They may have indulged the more pacific dreams of Plato or More, or the unborn longings of Rous- seau. Whatever their thoughts and hopes, they perished W'ith their authors in the Canadian wilderness. The little band of Jesuits who accompanied the first French explorers to the regions of the upper St. Lawrence soon saw the advantages of the situation. During the win- ter of 1634, while the Jesuit Fathers were gathered in the residence of their superior, Father Le Jeune, at Quebec, the plans for this work were laid. Including Le Jeune, there were six of the Jesuit Fathers on the Huron mission. They were not at all discouraged by the difficulty of their undertaking, although they intended the conversion of a savage nation. ^ Le Jeune wrote to his superior in France "the harvest is plentiful and the laborers few." They were not without the benefit of experience, for the father su- perior himself had been in Quebec several years acquainting himself with the Indians, teaching and converting their children. He had even spent a winter with the Indians in the forest, accompanying them on their hunting trips. He knew very well what life among them meant. The terror of the work, however, only made it the more inviting. The Jesuits began at once to learn the Huron language and to collect necessary materials for the work among the In- dians. The distance from Quebec to the home of the Hurons was almost a thousand miles. After a tiresome journey of a month, poling their canoes up the Ottawa river, the fore- most priests reached the Huron villages on Thunder Bay. After they had spent five years in missionary work among the tribes, making regular rounds from town to town, they looked over the field as best they could and decided to make 1 Francis Parknian, The Jesuits in 'North Anuricn, 42 seq. See also Jesuit Relations, index, '"Huron ilission." THE FRENCH IN INDIANA 3 their mission home at St. Marie on the south side of Matche- dash Bay. A systematic organization of the tribes was perfected, and the calendar of the saints was drawn on for new names for the Indian villages. There were St. Ignace, St. John the Baptist, St. Joseph, St. Michael, St. Marie, St. Louis and St. Paul. When in 1649 everything seemed promising of success, the Iroquois, the ancient enemies of the Hurons, attacked them with customary fury. The Hu- ron nation was destroyed and with it went the dream of a Jesuit empire around the Great Lakes. Jesuit priests continued to visit the western tribes for half a century, but few of them ever set foot on what is now the soil of Indiana. Within the next half century the Jesuit Fathers, Allouez, Dablon, and Marquette, estab- lished important missions around the Great Lakes. Some of these priests may have crossed from the Kankakee to the St. Joseph river, in Indiana, on their way to the West, but no mission is known to have been established in Indiana at this early date. § 2 The Fur Traders In the next period, 1650 to 1750, missionaries and fur- traders mingled together. It is always difficult to tell whether a post was established primarily as a mission or as a fur-trading station. The latter was not so much a place where furs were collected as a center from which agents visited the neighboring tribes to show the kettles, blankets, knives, and other articles of trade furnished by the French, and to encourage the Indians to carry their furs to the large posts on the lower St. Lawrence. The annual trip of the Indians to Three Rivers, Quebec, or Montreal was full of danger. Usually two or three hun- dred warriors went together. They made the journey in June and July, going by way of Lake Nipissing and the Ottav/a river to avoid the Iroquois tribes. Arriving near Quebec or Montreal, they landed, put up their tents, greased and painted their bodies, and assorted their goods prepara- tory to trading. Their goods consisted almost entirely of furs and tobacco. The second day was usually devoted to 4 HISTORY OF INDIANA a formal council between the French officers and the chiefs. After the council, two more days were consumed in bar- tering. Some of the tribesmen were expert gamblers and tried their luck against the French; others, especially the Hurons, were said to have been skillful thieves. After the trading was all done, the French invited their visitors to a grand feast. Then followed a night of revelry, after which the Indians set out at dawn for their homes. In this way, no doubt, many of Indiana's native inhabitants visited the French on the lower St. Lawrence. During the fall and winter seasons the trader spent his time, in part, among the Indians preparing for the harvest of furs in the spring. He was the leading man of the post or colony holding his commission directly froiyi his king. He had money and influence at court. Around him was a nondescript body of hunters, soldiers, and adventurers, over whom he held nominal military power. With each band of fur gatherers there went a Jesuit, whose gentle influence it was that welded the strong friendships be- tween the French and Indians. It will be enough for our purpose if we describe the labors of one of these traders. La Salle was a member of the well-known family of Caveliers of Rouen, France, the son of a wealthy burgher merchant. He was educated by the Jesuits, who then con- trolled the best schools in the world. A brother of his was a Sulpician priest in Canada. With what little pocket- money he could get. La Salle sailed for Canada, reaching Quebec in 1666, whence he went on immediately to Mon- treal, then little more than a mission of the Sulpicians. He acquired a large tract of land at what is now Lachine, at the head of the rapids, nine miles above Montreal. This place was well situated for the fur trade. La Salle learned from the Seneca Indians that far to the west was a beautiful river flowing through the forest to join another great river which flowed far to the south and emptied into the Vermilion Sea. It did not take him long to make up his mind that here was a chance to serve his nation and also himself. This, he thought, was the river that would lead him to the South Sea and thus open a route THE FRENCH IN INDIANA 5 to India. The governor and the priests of Canada were easily won over to the enterprise, especially since La Salle undertook to pay all expenses himself. For this purpose he sold his grant at Lachine. By July 6, 1669, La Salle with twenty-four men in seven canoes was ready to start from Lachine. His men paddled the canoes up the St. Lawrence and into Lake Ontario. In thirty-five days from the time they left their camp they had reached a small bay on the south side of Lake Ontario near the mouth of the Seneca river. Here they left their boats, and went with some Seneca Indians to their village homes. The Senecas did not take kindly to La Salle's plan of going to the Ohio, and refused to show him the way. The latter went back to his canoes and continued westward on the lake to Niagara river. At an Indian village in this neighborhood he met a party of warriors returning with a Pottawattomie prisoner. This prisoner La Salle ransomed on his agreeing that he lead the Frenchman to the Ohio. Tradition has it that the party then came on southward from Lake Erie until they reached a branch of the Ohio. This stream they descended to its mouth; thence down the Ohio as far as the Falls at Louisville. Here La Salle's men deserted him and turned back to the east, leaving their captain alone to find his way back to Canada as best he could. Having returned to the Great Lakes, La Salle is said by Margry to have sailed westward across Lake Erie, through the Detroit river, and Lake Huron, around to the southern point of Lake Michigan, to have crossed over to the Illinois river, followed it down to the Mississippi, and to have floated far enough down the Missisippi to assure himself that it emptied into the Gulf of Mexico. That he discovered the Ohio, there is little doubt ; but of his early discovery of the Missisippi we cannot be sure.^ During the following six or seven years he does not seem to have been active. However, he never forgot the rivers he had seen or heard of 2 Winsor. Narrative and Critical History of America, IV, 201 ; Park- man, LaSallc and the Discovery of the Great West (index) ; Oscar J. Craig, Indiana Historical Society Pnhlication^, II, p. 7. (2) 6 . HISTORY OF INDIANA and the opportunities they held for fur trade and coloniza- tion. Compared with the frozen wastes of Canada, the prairies and river bottoms of Ilinois and Indiana seemed fairyland. The road from Quebec, though, was too long and dangerous, so he planned to reach the new field by way of the Mississippi. By the year 1678 everything being in readiness he started west to open up the fur trade of upper Canada. While spending the following vdnter at Fronte- nac on Lake Ontario, he built a small ship called the Griffin. With this he sailed through Lake Erie and up the Detroit river, across Lake St. Clair into Lake Huron, through the Straits of Mackinac into Lake Michigan, landing in Sep- tember at Green Bay. The ship started back to Niagara. The explorers came on down to the southern shore of Lake Michigan and paddled around to the mouth of the St. Joseph river, which they called Miamis, reaching this place by November 1. Here, near the mouth of the river, they built a fort — the little Fort Miamis — while they were waiting for Lieutenant Henri de Tonty and his companions, who were coming overland. December 3 the party, numbering twenty-eight, started in eight canoes for the Illinois country, going by way of the Kankakee portage. They ascended the St. Joseph of the Lakes until they reached the south bend, near where the city of South Bend now stands. They watched carefully for the portage path which they had been told was in that neighborhood and by which they hoped to reach the Illinois. Unfortunately while the Mohegan hunter was absent they passed this path without noticing it. While La Salle was on shore searching for it he became separated from his friends. Night came on bringing with it a snowstorm. Wrapped in their blankets the weary explorers lay down to sleep. Meanwhile their leader, hopelessly lost, found a grass bed, prepared by an Indian, and in that he passed the night. So fared these early white visitors to Indiana, the first of whom we have any clear and reliable account. At four o'clock the next day La Salle regained the river and soon found his men. The Indian guide who had meantime been hunting for the trail (which he finally found) had THE FRENCH IN INDIANA 7 returned also and together they started on the portage path for the Kankakee, five miles distant. It did not take them long to reach the Kankakee, a narrow ribbon of water, flow- ing drowsily through the tufts of swamp grass, obstructed here and there with clusters of alder bushes and pools of still water. In this stream they launched their canoes and floated slowly westward toward the Illinois country. Game was scarce and provisions ran low. Finally, when almost exhausted they found a buffalo bull mired in the swamp. They killed him, dragged him out, and feasted. They then floated on down the river into the Illinois, and down that river until they came to a high cliff overlooking the left bank of the stream. Nearby was a large Indian town, but no Indians. Here La Salle determined to build a fort and gather around him the Indian tribes of the region which now em- braces the greater part of Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, and Ken- tucky. To this place he determined to transport his goods and establish a central trading station for all this western country. He could send his furs down the Mississippi river to the Gulf, and thence to France, while his goods to be used in traffic with the Indians could be brought back up the Mississippi in the returning boats. The site chosen was the favorite dwelling place of the Illinois Indians. In the vicinity were encamped the Peoria Indians, Miamis, Piankeshaws, Mascoutins, Weas and others from far and near. There were even refugee Abenakis from the forests of Maine, and Hurons from the lands beyond the Great Lakes. Most of these had been driven here by fear of the Iroquois. It is doubtful if a single Indian tribe at this time made its home in what is now Indiana through dread of those wide-ranging marauders, who had secured fire- arms from the Dutch at New York. La Salle went to work immediately to carry out his plans. He named his fort St. Louis in remembrance of his king, Louis XIV. He gathered furs during the winter, and sent them by different members of the party to Montreal. The faithless agents sold the furs, but never reported to their master. As La Salle was hastening back to Canada to ascertain the 8 HISTORY OF INDIANA trouble, on the way he met a new commander, sent out by the governor of Canada to take possession of Fort St. Louis. La Salle concealed his anger, went on to Canada, ar- ranged matters there, but when he returned he found his fort and village completely ruined. In the autumn of 1680 a war party of Iroquois, well armed, and led by a chief in a Jesuit robe, had conquered the Illinois town. The Indians themselves were saved through the tact and bravery of Tonty, the lieutenant of La Salle, but the town was utterly destroyed; so that when La Salle returned there were only enough traces remaining to show what had been the fury of its Iroquois destroyers. Thus was dispelled the dream of making a nation of fur-gatherers out of the western Indians. The efforts of La Salle, however, did not end with this defeat. During the year 1682-3 he was again busy among the Indians of Indiana and Illinois trying to persuade them to settle once more around his fort. He even invited Indians from across the Mississippi to join him. Indiana was al- most deserted of her native population. But the failure of the plan was assured even before La Salle's death. Had it prospered, what later became the Northwest Territory would have become an immense fur-trading field with the Indians as the fur gatherers. After the downfall of La Salle, there was a general migration of the tribes, due to a weakening of French influence. § 3 Louis XIV and the Mississippi Valley At the opening of the eighteenth century, it seemed that France had a firm grip on the north central part of what is now the United States. She held its two natural highways, the Mississippi and St. Lawrence rivers; but there was a fatal weakness both in the north and south. The French were hindered in the navigation of the Missis- sippi by the hostile Chickasaws, who lived on the Vicksburg bluffs. On the other hand they were not able to pass the Niagara river, or the upper St. Lawrence, on account of the THE FRENCH IN INDIANA 9 hostile Iroquois. Had it not been for these two tribes of Indians the history of the Northwest might have been different. Nevertheless the French king, Louis XIV, began at this time to take great interest in the Mississippi Valley. The country was divided between the governments at New Orleans and Quebec, the dividing line running east and west through central Indiana, near Terre Haute. A French explorer named D'Iberville, under instructions from Louis XIV, tried to carry out the scheme of La Salle by concen- trating the northwestern tribes on the Ohio, but this failed. Along with this plan of D'Iberville it was decided to construct a sufficient number of forts within the north- western country to protect it from the English traders who were rapidly becoming interested in the western fur-trade. D'Iberville himself established a post in 1699 at Biloxi, Mississippi. La Motte Cadillac fortified the post at Detroit in 1701. Forts Chartres and Kaskaskia were established over on the Mississippi in southern Illinois. Since the In- dians were moving toward the east, it was planned to fortify the route from Lake Erie to the Mississippi by way of the Wabash. It was in carrying out this policy that most of the permanent posts of the Northwest were founded. These guarded the important river thoroughfares and the great portages. Around, and in them the missionaries and traders made their headquarters and for this reason the Indians also frequently gathered near. The policy of the king in selling the exclusive right of the fur-trade to a single man or company had not only ruined the fur-trading business but had demoralized the traders. In the early eighteenth century the only white people in what is now Indiana were the roving fur-traders, called coureurs de hois, and the Jesuit missionaries. The French fur-traders had become divided into two classes. Those who had no license were called coureurs de hois or woods rangers, partly because they had no fixed homes. They were either petty criminals from France, or Canadians, driven from home by the severe trading laws of the time. They lived with the Indians in true Indian fashion. Their life was hard. In storm and shine they plied their paddles along 10 HISTORY OF INDIANA the lakes or on the small streams, overhung by boughs and grapevines and obstructed by drift, rocks, or sunken logs. While they, at times, feasted on venison and turkey, their usual fare was parched corn and bear grease. Once in a long while they visited the French towns of lower Canada spending a few weeks there in drunken revelry; but they were always in danger of being taken as outlaws. Reck- less, careless, lawless, openhearted, trusty, and jovial, they had the characteristics of the modern cowboys of the plains. The licensed traders formed a more orderly class. At Quebec and Montreal they had headquarters, from which they carried their goods to the western posts in canoes. The Indian pony, a horse from Normandy, was soon brought in for a pack horse; still later Canadian carts were used at such portages as Niagara and Ft. Wayne, but never for long journeys. Very little record was left of this period of our history. Rarely could more than one man of a party or at a post write, and all his time was taken in listing furs and keeping accounts. § 4 Miami Indians Reference has been made heretofore to the Indians inhabitating the soil of what is now Indiana. It is of course impossible to gather enough data to write a satis- factory account of the Miamis or any other of the western tribes in the seventeenth century. A short account, how- ever, will give some idea of the location, numbers and char- acteristics of these forest folk. In 1658, Gabriel Dreuillettes, then stationed at the mission of St. Michael on the west shore of Lake Michigan, reported that the Miamis, evidently the whole nation, for they numbered according to his estimate eight thousand men or twenty-four thousand souls, were in the southwest corner of what is now the State of Michigan. This is in harmony with other reports which go to show that the val- ley of the St. Joseph of the Lakes was one of their favorite homes. The Iroquois of New York seem to have invaded the THE FRENCH IN INDIANA 11 western country, what is now Indiana and Illinois, about 1670 and caused a panic among the native tribes. They had succeeded in getting firearms from the Dutch at New York about 1630. During the next forty years they waged incessant and victorious war on all their neighbors, almost exterminating the New England tribes on the east, the Dela- wares on the south, the Eries on the west, and the Hurons on the north and northwest. With these tribes subdued they led their war parties farther to the west and attacked the Miamis and the Illinois on the prairies. For this reason, presumably, tlie Miamis next appear in history west of Lake Michigan. In 1670 Claude Allouez, then stationed at Green Bay, reported a Miami village a day's journey in the interior from that mission. At the same time another band was living near the Illinois towns down on the Illinois river. The same year, Allouez made a trip to central Wisconsin where, mingling with the Foxes and the Mascoutins, he found what he took to be the whole Miami nation. The mis- sionary, Allouez, adds significantly that they were all in terror because a war party of Iroquois had swooped into the neighborhood recently and destroyed a Fox village. Allouez was impressed with the general character of the Miamis. He called them gentle, affable, and sedate. Their language was in harmony with their dignity. They spoke slowly, manifesting great interest in what the Jesuit, Al- louez, had to say. Two years later, 1672, when Allouez re- turned to this station there yet remained ninety cabins of Miamis. The Jesuit relation of the same year also stated that the village near Green Bay still remained. By 1674 Allouez had gathered a goodly colony of them at the mission of St. Francis Xavier on Green Bay. The missionaries invariably spoke well of the Miamis, praising especially their ability as hunters, and their faithfulness. Jean de Lamberville, writing September 20, 1682, to Count Frontenac stated that the Iroquois had at that time a large number of Miami captives whom they would soon torture unless French intervention saved them. De Lam- berville also feared that an Iroquois army, twelve hundred 12 HISTORY OF INDIANA strong, then forming, as the missionaries supposed, at the instigation of the English for an invasion of the Illinois country, would completely annihilate the Miamis and their neighbors the Siskakon and Ottawa tribes on the head- waters of the Maumee, on their return journey. In 1680, as has been noted in the account of La Salle's exploration, the Iroquois attacked the Illinois with disas- trous results to the latter. There were many traditions of this Iroquois war handed down to the missionaries and traders among the western Indians. What battles were fought, what tragedies were enacted, what heroism dis- played, or what the final result was, can never now be known. One of these traditions, dear to the Miamis, was to the effect that a Miami chief having seen an army of Iroquois pass on its way to attack the Illinois at once dis- patched runners to all his villages and to the villages of all his kinsmen, summoning all to meet him, prepared for des- perate battle. With his tribesmen he formed an ambuscade on the banks of the Wabash and, as the Iroquois warriors returned, delirious with blood and plunder, fell upon them with such fury that only a few escaped. This battle was said to have been fought where Terre Haute now stands. The place was known among the Indians as the "Old Battle Ground." Whether there is any truth in the tradition, or whether Miami ingenuity contrived it to hide the shame of their submission to the Iroquois, the fact is beyond question that the Miamis were back on their old hunting grounds in northeastern Indiana and western Ohio about the year 1700. By this time they had secured firearms from the French and English and it is possible that in this tradition- ary battle in which they handled the Iroquois so roughly they fought with firearms on equal terms. "^ Gen. William H. Harrison, who was well acquainted with the western Indians, said the Miamis occupied all of Indiana, Illinois and Wisconsin south of the Fox and Wis- consin rivers, and Ohio east of the Scioto. He thought them sje. Winsor, The Mississippi Basin, 2G. THE FRENCH IN INDIANA 15 In the fall of 1700, Gravier, then on a hunting trip with the Kaskaskia Indians, stopped at the mouth of the Ohio river. The main stream he called the Wabash. It was formed, he observed, of three rivers, the Wabash proper, which came from the country of the Miamis; the Ohio, which came from the lands of the Iroquois ; and the branch from the southeast, which flowed from the land of the Shawnees who traded with the English. These remarks show that the Jesuits had an accurate general idea of the Ohio Valley.s The next notice of the Ohio river has nothing to do directly with the history of Indiana though it has given rise, through a misunderstanding, to a great deal of contro- versy. Charles Juchereau de St. Denis, in the autumn of 1702, established a trading post and tannery on the lower Ohio, perhaps where Fort Massac was later built. The purpose was to overawe the English traders on the Ohio. Father Mermet accompanied Juchereau from Kaskaskia. The site of Juchereau's post was unhealthful and it was found impossible to keep the Indians there. The com- mandant himself died two years later at which time the post was abandoned. It was only a temporary post and all trace of it was soon gone. The earlier historians of the West were confused by the Jesuit relations calling this "la poste sur la Vabache." It was thought to refer to the founding of "Au Poste" or Vincennes." The French were driven away by the hostile Miamis.^" By this time a peace had been patched up between the Seneca Indians, an Iroquois tribe, and their western neigh- bors. The Miamis were again settled in Indiana and north- western Ohio. The Shawnees had returned to Ohio from their fastnesses in the mountains of Kentucky and Tennes- see and fur traders were visiting regularly the tribes on the Indiana streams. A keen rivalry soon sprang up between the English and Dutch on the one hand and the French on the other. 8 Winsor, Mississippi Basin, 61. 9 The Jesuit Relations, LXV, 268 ; LXVI, 39. 10 Winsor, The Mississippi Basin, 70. 16 HISTORY OF INDIANA During the closing years of the seventeenth century the Miamis, Ouiatanons, and other smaller tribes began settling, or resettling, in what is now Indiana. The reasons for this are not plain. Besides the tradition concerning a defeat of the Iroquois, it may be suggested that the founding of Detroit in 1701, the presence of at least 1,000 and perhaps 2,000 armed Frenchmen in and around Detroit, ^^ the effort of the English to prevent the westward forays of the Iro- quois which were preventing English traders from enjoying the patronage of the northwestern Indians, and an inter- tribal war all influenced the Miamis and their kinsmen to return to the eastv/ard. At first these tribes gathered in pretty close around De- troit. But as fear of the English and Iroquois diminished they moved farther and farther south. First on the St. Joseph of the Lakes in 1702; in 1712 they were down on the upper Maumee trading secretly with the English; and later they had ventured far down on the Wabash and the Scioto. The French soon realized their mistake in bringing the Miamis so far east, where they were falling under the control of the English. The policy of France in the west during the next forty years was dominated by the purpose of preventing the English from enjoying the trade with these Indiana and Ohio tribes. The expedition of Celoron Bienville down the Ohio, and the building of Fort Du- quesne on the site of Pittsburg were parts of the same general program. Sieur de Vincennes had been sent by Frontenac, governor general of Canada, as early as 1697 to command a post among the Miamis. The exact location of this post does not appear but most probably it was the one established by La Salle near the mouth of the St. Joseph in southwestern Michigan, In 1704 Vaudreuil, who succeeded Frontenac in 1698, sent Vincennes again on a mission to the Miamis to prevent them, if possible, from attacking the Iroquois. The gov- ernor added that Captain Vincennes was "much beloved" by these Indians. He took with him some goods, six men, and two canoes. Several times, on later occasions, Vau- 11 Documents Rrlaling to the Colonial Histori/ of Xeio York. IV, 701. THE FRENCH IN INDIANA 17 dreuil sent Vincennes on missions to the Miamis. Finally in his communication of October 28, 1719, he stated that the Sieur de Vincennes had died at his post among the Miamis, where the city of Fort Wayne, Indiana, now stands. It seems that the Indians were on the point of mi- grating with Vincennes to the northern St. Joseph river but upon his death they refused to leave what they called their ancestral town of Kekionga. In 1672 the Wea Indians were in central Wisconsin, gathered with their kinsmen around the mission of St. Jaques on the Fox river, under the care of Claude Allouez. They were at this time a small band.^- By 1710 they had returned to northern Indiana and were under the control of missionaries from Detroit, i"* In an official report on the Indians of the Lake-Erie country, dated 1718, the agent said five villages of Ouiatanons or Weas dwelt on the Wa- bash. In language, customs, and dress they resembled the Miamis. They had a "fort" situated on a high hill from which one could see countless buifalos grazing on the prairie. These Indians had earned an enviable reputation among the traders for their cleanliness. They allowed no dirt or filth to remain on the floor of their "fort" which they kept sanded like the "Tuilleries." They had, at that time, over two leagues of cleared land where they raised corn, pumpkins and melons. The men numbered one thousand or twelve hundred, wore very little clothing, and played and danced incessantly.^'* To keep the Iroquois out the French constructed a stockade at Ouiatanon on the north bank of the Wabash in 1720. This was on the main western trail from Post Miami at the site of Fort Wayne. Governor Vaudreuil was very apprehensive lest all the Miamis go to New York to trade, as eight or ten canoes had done the previous summer. In order to forestall this movement, the governor had decided to send Sieur Dubuis- son to take charge of the post at Ouiatanon. This was in 12 Jesuit Relations, LVIII, 23. 293. ^3 Jesuit Relations, LXIX. 193. 14 Documents Relating to the Colonial History of Neiv York, IX, 891, 18 , HISTORY OF INDIANA the autumn of 1719. He wrote as if the post had already been established. ^^ The purpose of Dubuisson was to get the confidence of the Indians as soon as possible and lead them to the St. Joseph river, away from the Maumee-Wabash route, which seems to have been much frequented at that early day by English traders. On the St, Joseph of the Lakes the Indians would be under the control of the garrison and traders of Detroit. 1*^ Dubuisson remained in command but a short time until he was relieved by Francois Morgane de Vincennes, thought to be the founder of Post Vincennes. He seems to have been a nephew of the Sieur de Vincennes who died at the post where Fort Wayne now stands. It is probable that Vincennes remained in command at Ouiatanon until he was called down the river to take charge of the post that has since borne his name. Ouiatanon remained an occupied post till its destruction by the Indians in Pontiac's War.^''' In his report to the Lords of Trade May 24, 1765, Sir William Johnson, the British agent for the northern In- dians, stated that several French families of the worst sort lived at the Miami (Fort Wayne) and several at Ouiatanon, and, in short, at all the places where they formerly had had posts or trading houses.^^ The same person writing in 1767, after Pontiac's war, complained that Ouiatanon had not been re-established as he had recommended. Its con- venient location in the neighborhood of several tribes, he observed, would make it a most convenient post for the traders. 19 The best that can be done now in the matter of the first permanent settlement of Indiana is to give briefly the tes- timony of the Jesuit relations and other fugitive references 15 Winsor, The MississipjH Basin, 2SG. ^^ Documents Relating to the Colonial History of New York, IX, 894. 1" For references to the history of Ouiatanon see Early Western Travels, index. The best single discussion of these early posts on the Wabash is by J. P. Dunn. Indiana, 41 seq. ^^ Documents Relating to the Colonial History of the State of New York, VII, 716. 19 /&i^, 973. THE FRENCH IN INDIANA 19 of the French officers and traders. A more careful search- ing of the French records may yet bring to light satisfactory evidence as to the time and manner of its establishment. Such discovery is problematical and, if made, will be in the nature of an accident. Nicholas Ignace de Beaubois took charge of the parish of Kaskaskia, July, 1720. September 15, following, the Company of the Indies filed a petition with the government asking that a post be established on the Wabash. It seems, however, that no action was taken ; for Charlevoix, writing November 8, 1721, after visiting the Illinois country, points out the great advantage a post on the Wabash would have. La Harpe, in 1724, and Boisbriant, the commandant at Chartres, wrote in 1725 as if no post had yet been estab- lished. In the accounts of the colony of Louisiana for 1726 is the following item : At the Wabash, when it is established, one priest, 600 livres; for a servant 185 livres. De Beau- bois, then at Chartres, was especially urgent that a post be established in the direction of the Ohio, since all re- ports indicated that English traders were making deep inroads on the Indian trade in that quarter. A list of the missionaries supported by the Company of the Indies, written by some clerk of the Company, or per- haps a monk, and dated November 21, 1728, included Pere d'Outrelay at the "Ouabache." A long struggle had been going on between the Capuchins and the Jesuits for the control of the missionary posts in Louisiana. Pere de Beaubois, who was no doubt the promoter of the mission at Vincennes, had in 1728 just been displaced by Pere Petit. Most of Beaubois' papers are, unfortunately, lost. A letter from the Company of the Indies to the governor of Louisiana, M. Perier, September 30, 1726, directed the latter to furnish eight or ten soldiers to Sieur de Vincennes in order to found a post on the lower Wabash. Sieur de Vincennes was then at Ouiatanon, the post among the Weas. Etienne d'Outrelay, a Jesuit who spent twenty years in 20 HISTORY OF INDIANA the Mississippi Valley, returning to France in 1747, is men- tioned as having been at the fort on the Wabash in 1728.-*^ A memorandum by M. de St. Denis, commandant at Nachitoches, dated November 30, 1731, stated that the War bash post had always been neglected, that it guarded the only avenue by which the English could attack Louisiana, and that he would favor a station there with 400 men rather than one with 300, as seems to have been intended. The commandant, he added, should receive 800 livres. This latter allowance Maurepas, the royal minister, had also fixed upon. Finally the letters of M. de Vincennes to the governor, dated March 7, 1733, and March 21, 1733, leave no doubt that a permanent post had been established before that date, at a point eighty leagues up the Wabash from its mouth. The date of the founding of the post, he left in obscurity. The position, he wrote, was well suited to the establishment of a large post, and he would have established one had he had the necessary troops. There had never been so great a need of troops during the three years of his stay at the post as there was at that time. The Illinois and the Miami were growing insolent, due no doubt to the contact with the English. The fortifications had been begun three years previous but nothing much had been done toward their completion. There was a stockade with two houses enclosed. The immediate construction of a guard house and barracks for the soldiers was recommended. Without more troops it would be impossible for him to remain there longer. The post, in his opinion, needed thirty men and an officer. The garrison consisted of ten men, and the "fort" was not large enough to accommodate even that number. There were evidently some French settlers around the post, since in the second letter the writer said the Chickasaws had, during the previous fall, killed six Frenchmen who lived at the Wabash. That the dominating motive in the establishment of the post was the protection of the fur trade is evident from the tone of the correspondence. "It is possible," observed Sieur 20 Jesuit Relations, LXVII. 342. note. THE FRENCH IN INDIANA 21 de Vincennes, "to send out from this post every year about 30,000 skins. That, Monsieur, is all the skins that can be secured for the present." The commandant was accustomed to borrow large sums of money from the voyageurs who frequented the place. There is evidence to show that quite a large number of these independent traders were then on the Wabash and its branches and doubtless they had other stockade posts in what is now Indiana.- ^ Louis Vivier was stationed there as a Jesuit missionary, 1754-1756.-- Francais Philibert Watrin, writing from Paris, September 3, 1764, said the "post called Vincennes or Saint Ange, from the names of the officers who com- manded there," was about eighty leagues from Kaskaskia and about seventy leagues up the Wabash from its mouth. He says nothing about its founding or its founders, unless we should infer that since he named two commanders he would have named them had there been others. Winsor thought the post Vincennes was known among the fur traders as early as 1722.23 These Indiana posts, excepting Vincennes, never came to be real settlements. For a while Ouiatanon remained the most important fur-trading and missionary post on the Wa- bash; but its importance diminished after eight or ten years. The old French post at Kekionga, or as it was usually called Fort Miami, if any fort was ever built, dis- appeared entirely, later, but Vincennes maintained its ex- istence unbroken. The dates of the first settlement of these places will, from the nature of the case, always remain uncertain. Each marks the location of an important Indian village. Fur traders made these places their temporary headquarters doubtless as early as 1700. Missionaries visited them as early or perhaps earlier. We do not even have the record of the first military stations established here. In 1736, a 21 The evidence couceruing the foundiug of Vincennes is well summed up in Vol. III. PuhUcations of the Indiana Historical Society, 255, seq. See also J. P. Dunn. Indiana, ch. II ; Jesuit Relations, index. Copies of the letters of Vincennes are in the library of Vincennes University. 22 Jesuit Relations, LXIX, 290, note. 23 The Mississippi Basin, 118. (3) 22 HISTORY OF INDIANA man by the name of Francois Morgane Sieur de Vincennes v^^as stationed at the Piankeshaw village, Chipkawke, with a considerable body of French troops. From the name of the officer comes the name of the city of Vincennes. This commandant was killed by the Chickasaws and his place taken by St. Ange. Whether Vincennes was the founder of the post, or even its first commandant, no one at this time can say with certainty. § 6 The French Settlers After the failure of La Salle, the king of France granted control of all the commerce of Louisiana to one of his courtiers named Anthony Crozat. This grant included the Illinois country and the Wabash. Crozat had expected to find rich mines of gold and silver, but disappointed in this he surrendered his gift to the cro^vn in 1717. That same year a monopoly of the trade was granted to the Mississippi Company. This company in turn was superseded by the Western Company, also called the Company of the Indies. From 1720 to 1731 the latter company was in exclusive con- trol of the Illinois and Indiana country. Its policy was not to encourage settlements, and it retained complete feudal rights over all who did settle in its territory. The company built Ft. Chartres, near Kaskaskia, and there made its headquarters. When the Company of the Indies surrendered its charter April 10, 1732, the king of France resumed direct control. From this period dates the actual settlements in both In- diana and Illinois. Before this everything had looked toward the fur trade. Now there were settlements made by cultivators of the soil. It is in connection with the car- rying out of this policy that the first authentic mention is made of the settlement at Vincennes. As stated above, the Chickasaw Indians made traffic on the Mississippi ex- tremely dangerous. In the year 1736, D'Artiguiette was instructed to take what force he had in Illinois and join De Vincennes, who was to come down the Wabash from his station supposed to be where Vincennes now stands. The THE FRENCH IN INDIANA 23 French, who numbered three or four hundred, were defeat- ed by the hostile Chickasaws. De Vincennes was among the slain. After this the records are silent as to Fort Vincennes for twelve years. From then, 1749, the records in the parish church are complete. The French settlers borrowed their habits of dress from the Indian. They wore little else than the hunting shirt, leggins, and moccasins, in colder weather a blanket or a buffalo robe being wrapped around the body. There were several styles of house building. The earliest house was built by setting in a square four forked posts and putting cross-poles from one to the other and making the walls and roof with bark or brush or anything else that was handy and would keep out wind and rain. A somewhat better house was built by the planters around Vincennes, which consisted of a double row of puncheons planted upright in the ground, the space between being filled with mortar, and whitewashed within and without. In still more pretentious houses, built in later years at the "Old Post," there were four or five rooms with an open porch on the side and an attic sleepingroom reached by a ladder. These rooms were warmed by a fireplace. Outside the house was a bake oven in the old French style.-^ Their woolly ponies were sheltered by a "pole stable" which could be removed when the accumulations of manure made it necessary. The priests in Canada made many complaints about the lawlessness of the coiireurs de hois or bush-lopers. The lat- ter were no better, perhaps no worse, than the ordinary In- dians with whom they lived and whose customs they adopted. After the transfer of the government of the Illi- nois and Wabash country from Canada to New Orleans a better class of French people came to the posts. Still there were never any French settlers at Ft. Wayne and Ouiatanon except fur traders. The latter, now no longer outlaws, could carry on a regular commerce with the larger towns. The Indians granted to the French at Vincennes a tract of land extending from Point Coupee below the present site of Merom to the mouth of White river and extending 24 For a picture of a bake oven see Harper's Magazine, CXVI, 440. 24 HISTORY OF INDIANA back on either side of the Wabash. This was held jointly and on this extensive domain the villagers laid off an ample commons of 5,000 acres which they enclosed vdth pickets. On this commons each villager had one or more strips for cultivation. These strips were separated only by balks or turn-rows. Each villager was compelled by the commandant or syndic to keep up his part of the fence. At times, it seems, this enclosure was used as a pasture — perhaps after harvest. Judge Jacob Burnet tells how diffi- cult it was for the Northwest Territorial Legislature in 1799 to regulate this commons, and a new law by the In- diana Territorial Legislature a few years later indicates that the early law was not entirely satisfactory. This commons lay southeast of the village of Vincennes, be- ginning about where the present courthouse stands. The village assembly usually determined all matters per- taining to the commons, or the common field. After church on Sunday the assembly would meet in the churchyard and determine a day for planting, or a day for harvest. The syndic presided over these parish meetings unless the mat- ter under consideration pertained to the church, when the priest took charge. Some farmers held their land as tenants direct from the crown; others of the wealthier class held large seigniories under feudal conditions. Nearly all these settlers on the Wabash were either commoners or tenants of the crown.^^ The farming in the Vincennes neighborhood was primi- tive. A large plow with wooden mold-board and flexible beam was in use. It was mounted on two wheels, the large one to run in the furrow, and a small one on the land. It was drawn usually by oxen as was later the cus- tom among the English settlers. Ordinarily a cart was found on each farm. This cart was a two-wheeled affair without any tires. On Sunday it served for a carriage in which the planter and his family rode to the parish church at Vincennes. The farm crops consisted of wheat and corn and various other grains, besides which there was always 25 Carter, Great Britam and the Illinois Country, 10 ; Jacob Burnet, tfotes on the Settlement of the Northwest Territory, 307. THE FRENCH IN INDIANA 25 a liberal supply of tobacco, for all the members of the family smoked, or used snuff. A great deal of wine and spruce beer was made for home use. The inhabitants were a jovial, careless, pious, unpolitical class of people. They took the world easy and so the world took them. After a year of bountiful harvest they spent the winter in social festivities such as dancing, feasting, and card playing. Even billiards were popular at this early date on the Wabash. They knew and cared little for the outside world. They sold beef, pork, and corn at New Orleans for what few manufactured goods they received. Their mili- tary commandant looked after all this world's affairs, and the parish priest attended to the affairs of the next world for them. Since there were no hotels, everybody's house was open to the stranger. A keen social rivalry existed and almost everyone knew his place. The invasion of Clark in 1779 put an end to this old-fashioned society. Little trace of the old settlers remains. In the schools in and about Vincennes, one may notice here and there the raven hair and the black sparkling eyes that mark a descendant of these subjects of Louis le Grande. With the passing of power to the English in 1763 the better class of the French inhabitants crossed the Missis- sippi into Spanish territory. This migration continued till after 1800, by which time most of the original French settlers had left the Illinois country. Their descendants may still be found on the lower Mississippi.-*' The more energetic Frenchmen were engaged in the fur trade. From the incomplete list, licensed by Governor Harrison in 1801, an idea may be had of the number, loca- tion and wide range of the early traders. All these had been trading previously, but the law then required that they take out a license. At Fort Wayne Joseph Richard- ville was one of the earliest traders. His son became a chief of the Miami tribe there. Peter la Fontaine, Baubien, and James Lasselle all traded at Fort Wayne before the Revolution. Lasselle held command of the post for some time during the Revolution till La Balme drove him away 26 Clarence E. Carter, The Illinois Country, 29. 26 HISTORY OF INDIANA / in 1780. Mr. Todd was licensed to trade at Blue River, Washington county; Mr. Dagenet at Terre Haute; Mr. Simon at Muncietown ; Mr. Henry Mayraus at Terre Haute ; Le Claire on the Vermillion river; Francis Boneus on the Kankakee ; Thomas Lusby with the Kickapoos ; Francis La- fantazii at the Kickapoo town on Pine creek; Louis Bouri on the Elkhart; Hyacinth Lasselle.on the Mississinewa ; Benart Besayou on lower Eel creek; Conner Brothers on White river ; Baptist Bino on the Tippecanoe ; Baptist Tou- pin with the Kickapoos; Francis Milleni on Vermillion; Charles Johnson at Terre Haute; Peter Thorn along the Ohio; Michael Brouillet on Vermillion river; Louis Severs on the Little Wabash; Joseph Dumay on White river; and Jonnet Pillet on White river. Some of them married Indian women and their children became warriors. The materials of the fur trade on the part of the Indians consisted entirely of furs and hides. During the French period traps were used almost exclusively in catching the wild animals. The French government never allowed its traders, in the early days, to supply the Indians with guns. It was not till near the close of the eighteenth century that these western tribes had them. The supply then came largely from the English. In exchange the traders gave coarse cloths, blue or scar- let paints, knives, hatchets, traps, kettles, hoes, blankets and, in ever increasing amounts, whiskey. The French had to buy these goods from a single company and pay high prices. So, when the English came, they could pay for furs almost double what the French had been offering. For instance, the French sold rifle balls at the rate of $4.00 per hundred, the English at $2.00. This caused great dissatisfaction and worry to the Indians. They liked the Frenchmen and hated the haughty Englishman; but their beaver skins would bring double value from the Englishman. There soon came to be two parties among the Wabash Indians, the one favor- ing the French and the other the English. The parties came to open war in 1751, and the English traders and their Indian partisans were driven out. The French government in America depended almost THE FRENCH IN INDIANA 27 absolutely on the fur trade. For that reason the trade was well guarded. The Indian country was divided into dis- tricts comparing approximately with the divisions agreed upon by the tribes themselves. To each district or tribe certain traders were given the exclusive right to trade and no other allowed to encroach. Each trader was encouraged to establish a post as his headquarters and encourage the Indians to come there to trade. The trader lived among his tribesmen, studied their wants and catered to their humor. The missionary was always present as a check on the trader.-" 27 Carter. Great Britain and the Illinois Country, 84. CHAPTER II the english period, 1763-1778 § 7 The English Conquest and Government The war between the English and French for the pos- session of the Ohio Valley was essentially a commercial struggle for the fur trade. The French interpreted the Treaty of Aix la Chapeile to confirm them in the owner- ship of the valley. The Marquis de la Galissoniere, the governor of Canada, began at once, after receiving news of the treaty, to secure the French interests. ^ The English as early as 1720 were jealous of the en- croachments of the French along the Ohio river. Governor Burnett of New York advised the Lords of Trade, Novem- ber 20, 1720, to forestall them or the English would not only lose the trade of the country but the valley itself.- Early in 1749 the French governor sent Captain Bien- ville de Celoron with a strong party of French and Indians on a mission to the Ohio. At Logstown, about twenty miles below the present site of Pittsburg, Bienville gathered the Indians together and instructed them as to the power and rights of the French. On his way down the Ohio he picked up a number of English traders and at an old Shawnee village on the Ohio released them with instructions to return beyond the mountains. At the same time he addressed notes to Governor Hamilton at Philadelphia and Governor Clinton at New York advising them of the trespasses of the traders and threatening to treat all such persons in the fu- ture as interlopers. This valiant Knight of the Order of St. 1 For a good account of the Ohio Valley and its strategic importance see the GoA'eruor's report for 1750. DocumentK Relating to the Colonial History of New York, X,"229. '■^Documents Relating to the Colonial Bislortj of New York, V, 576. THE ENGLISH PERIOD 29 Louis then proceeded on down the Ohio burying on its banks leaden plates bearing a proclamation of ownership from King Louis XV. Hardly had Celoron passed on his way down the Ohio river when George Croghan, an agent of Governor Hamil- ton of Pennsylvania, appeared among the Indians and con- tradicted what the Frenchman had proclaimed.^ The correspondence of the French and English officers and their agents is full of hints of intrigue, murder, and bloody foray, incited by partisan leaders or abetted by promises of reward. No Indian chief was safe from the murderous weapons of his tribesmen. Every village had its English and its French faction. A part of the hunters of each tribe traded with the English, a part with the French. Governor Galissoniere recommended to Count Maurepas that he send 300 or 400 good soldiers to the posts on the Wabash in 1748. Ensign Douville of Post Miamis, who was conducting a party of Miamis under Chiefs Coldfoot and Hedgehog down to Montreal, was stopped at Niagara by a war party of Mohawks. Douville stated that the English had offered a snug reward to La Demoiselle, a Miami chief on the Scioto, if he would bring Douville's head to the English governor. Ensign Chevalier de La Peyrode, the commandant at Ouiatanon, started in August, 1748, with a large party of Weas on a visit to Montreal but was driven back by the Hurons, then friendly to the English. Sieur Laperriere Marin, commandant among the Miamis at St. Joseph, also stated that English emissaries had been among the Miamis and Pottawattomies of his post poisoning their minds against the French. Scores of traders lost their lives in trying to carry on trade under such conditions. French partisans in the paint and feathers of warriors led the savages in long expeditions against the English frontiers. In 1750 Colonel William Johnson, Indian agent for Great Britain, complained to the Lords of Trade that the French 3 The best source for this struggle is the Documents Relating to the Colonial History of New York, index; aud Croghau's Journal in Early Western Travels, I, 45. 30 HISTORY OF INDIANA were encouraging the Lake Indians to make war on the English allies on the Ohio. In May, 1753, Commander Hol- land at Oswego reported that thirty French canoes, part of a force said to number 6,000 under Monsieur Marin, had passed that place on their way to the Ohio. Close after them came the report that six Englishmen and fourteen friendly Indians had been killed on the Ohio. These instan- ces are enough to show the conditions that prevailed in the western country from 1748 to the breaking out of war in 1755. The church records of Vincennes during this period commence with the marriage record of a Canadian French- man and a French-Indian girl, written by the officiating priest, Sebastian Louis Meurin. There is little of historical interest in this early record of baptisms, marriages and burials. Father Meurin was succeeded by Louis Vivier, also a Jesuit, who remained until 1756 ; when he was suc- ceeded by Julian Duvernay, the last of the Jesuits, who re- mained until France gave up the territory in 1763. The Illinois mission, of which Vincennes was a part, was badly neglected during these and succeeding years, John Baptist Lamorinie was stationed at Post St. Joseph as mis- sionary to the Miamis. Pierre du Jaunay was transferred from the Miamis to Ouiatanon about 1745. He returned to Quebec about 1754. He seems to have been the only mis- sionary who ever resided at Ouiatanon. Marchand de Lig- neris was in command of the garrison at Ouiatanon at the same time.^ The echoes of the seven years of French and Indian warfare were scarcely heard in this land of savages, French peasants, and coureurs de hois. Many of the Miamis helped Beaujeu in the destruction of Braddock, and doubtless many young warriors joined in the raids on the Virginia and Pennsylvania frontier. Although the war did not reach the inhabitants of this remote wilderness the peace at the close of the war roused them to fury. By the surrender of Montreal, 1760, the French gave up this western territory to the English. The French gar- 4 Rev. Herman Alerding, The Diocese of Vincennes, 58. THE ENGLISH PERIOD 31 risons were to be withdrawn and the posts delivered over to the English as soon as possible. The duty of carrying out this decree fell on Colonel Robert Rogers ; for that pur- pose he left Montreal, September 13, 1760, with about 200 men in boats. These were the famous Rogers Rangers, the terror of the Indians on the New England border. No body of English troops having ever penetrated so far west, their coming excited alarm among the savages. Pontiac met Rogers on the south shore of Lake Erie. After some hesi- tation the Indian chief gave his permission for the English to pass on to Detroit. On November 29, 1760, the lilies of France ceased to wave over Detroit. Detachments of the Sixtieth English Regiment came and took possession of Ouiatanon and Post Miamis, in what is now Indiana. The other western posts on the Great Lakes were not occupied till the following spring. All told, there were about six hundred English soldiers stationed west of Pennsylvania.^ § 8 PoNTiAc's War The English soldiers, and especially the English traders, were extremely offensive to the Indians. The soldiers re- fused to mingle with the Indians, refused to sell them guns and ammunition, and refused to allow them to loaf inside the forts. The English fur traders, taken by and large, were the worst class of men in America. They had the characteristic commercial disregard of sentiment. To them the Indian was a very inferior being, to be cheated, out- raged, robbed or murdered as best suited their money- making purposes. The traders had no regard for the help- less settlers on the frontier so long as they themselves es- caped with plunder and life. We have to turn to Simon Legree, the villain slave-master of literature, to find a com- parison. If it were necessary to go further to explain this sudden uprising of the Indians in Pontiac's war, one might point out the long and intimate friendship of the French traders with the Indians, the natural result of which was to prejudice the Indians against the English. 5 Avery, A History of the United States, IV, 354. 32 HISTORY OF INDIANA The news of the treaty, ceding all the western country to the English without so much as consulting the Indians, brought all this sullen hatred to a head. The Senecas in the east and the Ottawa-Ojibwa-Pottawattomie confederacy in the west, organized the attack. Their plan, briefly, was to capture Fort Pitt and Detroit, together with the smaller posts, after which they would throw all their force against the English frontier and drive the white people into the sea. Pontiac, the Ottawa chief, was the soul of the league and one of the greatest of American Indians.^ Early on the morning of May 7, 1763, a party of Indians in canoes crossed from the Canadian shore to Detroit and stalked with apparent unconcern up to the palisades of the fort. It was the first act in a bloody siege that lasted throughout the summer. First, the garrison of Detroit was forced to see the dead bodies of a relief party, 60 or 80 in number, gashed and mutilated with knife and fire, float past the fort. Hardly had this horror ended when a long line of naked Wyandotte warriors, painted black, paraded in front of the fort, each decorated with a ghastly scalp. It was the news from the Sandusky, Ohio, garrison, butchered May 16. A month later, June 15, a band of Pottawattomies came to the fort bringing Ensign Schlosser, who, with fourteen men, had been stationed at Fort St. Joseph, at the mouth of the river St. Joseph. The same tale of treachery and slaughter was repeated. On June 18, news was brought by a Jesuit priest that the Chippewas and Ojibways had surprised the post at Michillimacinac, slain its garrison, and captured its commander. Captain George Etherington. Soon after this came came a letter from Lieutenant Edward Jenkins of Ouiatanon. On the morning of June 1, the lieu- tenant had been invited to their hut by some friendly In- dians. The Kickapoos, Mascoutins, Piankeshaws, and Weas. 6 "This Indian has a more extensive power than ever was Ijnown among that people; for every chief used to command his own tribe; but eighteen nations, by French intrigue had been brought to unite, and choose this man for commander, after the English had conquei'ed Canada; having been taught to believe that, aided by France, they might make a vigorous push and drive us out of America." Thomas Morris's Journal in Early Western Travels, I, 305. THE ENGLISH PERIOD 33 FRANiaiN { i GIBSON WASHINGTON ^ / 7 k r^ "} PERRY HARRISON 9^ POSEY WARRICK ^ JEFFERSON DEARBORN 1 SWITZER- LAND CLARK INDIANA Counties, 1S14. By E. V. Shockley. 34 HISTORY OF INDIANA together with a few French families, then lived near this post. As soon as Jenkins had reached the place, the In- dians seized and bound him as they had done several of his soldiers. They had then forced him to surrender the rest of the garrison. Here, however, the rule had been broken and the prisoners had been placed in the house of a French trader, where they were well cared for. It seems, however, that this leniency was a second thought, due per- haps to the French traders, Lorain and Maisonirtle ; for the Indians later made known a plan which they had formed to kill all the garrison the previous night. Either the order for attack did not reach the Indians in time, having re- ceived the wampum belt after dark the night before, or the French traders prevented the bloodshed. Jenkins re- mained a prisoner at Ouiatanon till after August 1, not knowing what hour he might be put to death. This post was destroyed by the Indians and never rebuilt.'^ Next came the report from Fort Miami, at the junction of the St. Joseph and the St. Mary, where the city of Fort Wayne nov»^ stands. Its commander, Ensign Holmes, had been put on his guard ; but on May 27, 1763, he was betrayed to a neighboring house by a young squaw, who lived with him, and shot down from ambush by two Indians. The girl's story was that in the wigwam a short distance from the fort was a sick woman, her mother, who needed his at- tention. The officer put on his coat and accompanied the girl across the meadow to the hut. Just as they were enter- ing the door two Indians stepped from behind the wigwam, fired and the ensign fell dead. His head was cut off and carried back to the fort. The sergeant who heard the shots, on running outside the gate to see vv^hat had happened, was seized and bound. When a Canadian named Godfrey then summoned the frightened soldiers to surrender in order to save their lives, they hastened to obey. Godfrey was a notorious French partisan. He had left Detroit with other Canadians soon after the siege began on the plea that he knew a French officer whom he could induce to come to De- troit and persuade Pontiac to quit the war. On the Maurnee 7 Parkmau, The Conspiracy of Ponii'Jc, index. THE ENGLISH PERIOD 35 he had robbed an English trader named John Welsh whom he sent to Detroit to be put to death. Godfrey was later captured and sentenced to death but pardoned on condition of his accompanying Tho mas M orris as an interpreter. All but one of the prisoners of Fort Miami were finally killed, many being tortured. When Morris visited the place in September of the following year one of them was still a prisoner, held for sacrifice. He was later adopted as a son by a squaw whose son was killed in the war. The post at Vincennes had never been turned over to the English. History has left us only meager accounts of what befell the English traders caught up in this whirlwind of savage anger. Our sympathy goes out to the British soldiers, only a handful in number, stationed one thousand miles away from any point of supply or reinforcement, and wholly unfitted by their training for such service.*' The fury of Pontiac's army wore itself out against the palisades of Detroit. Col. John Bradstreet with English reinforcements reached the fort in August, 1764. A sol- dier, Capt. Thomas Morris, was sent by Bradstreet on a mission up the Maumee to where Pontiac had withdrawn his bafiied host. On every hand he saw evidences of the ravages made by the Indians. One Indian boasted that he was riding Braddock's horse, a large dapple iron gray. Another offered Morris a volume of Shakespeare for some gunpowder. All the tribesmen were in bad humor. Mor- ris found Fort Miami abandoned except for some renegade French traders who made the deserted barracks their home. A Kickapoo village occupied the meadow around the post. The main Miami village was across the St. Joseph river, northeast of the fort. Ottawa, Wea, Mascoutin and Dela- ware Indians mingled in the neighborhood in inextricable confusion. He also found the Delaware, Shawnee and Wyandotte Indians in little humor for peace. After being twice tied to the stake for torture, he escaped to Detroit. He had a letter to St. Ange at Fort Chartres, but his s Parkmnn. The Conspiracy of Pontiac, I, 27S ; Early Western Travels, I. 312. 36 HISTORY OF INDIANA friends advised him that he would certainly be killed at Ouiatanon. He entrusted his letter to St. Vincent, a Frenchman, then fighting with the Indians. The double- dealing of the tribes and the hostility of the French were apparent. While making pretenses of friendship to Brad- street at Sandusky they were sending war belts to the Miamis, Kickapoos and Illinois. But the Indians soon had a different man to deal with.'^ The marauding along the borders of Pennsylvania and Virginia continued. It was thought that fully three hun- dred whites were in captivity among the savages of Ohio and Indiana. In order to liberate these and punish the captors. Col. Henry Bouquet gathered a force at Fort Pitt in the fall of 1764. Besides the British regulars he had nearly 1,000 Pennsylvanians and 200 Virginia rangers. A rapid march brought him to the banks of the Muskingum in the heart of the Indian country. He summoned the Shawnee and Wyandotte warriors to his camp, ordered them to leave their chiefs with him as hostages, go back at once and bring all white people among them, whether captive or not, to him. Thoroughly alarmed, the Indians obeyed. A large number of men and women had accom- panied Colonel Bouquet in the hope of finding their long- lost relatives. The scene that followed the return of the Indians, bringing in 206 prisoners, was one of the most tragic ever witnessed on the American frontier. As fam- ilies were reunited, as wife and children were restored to husband and father, as mothers found their babes after years of captivity, and as others learned of the torture and death of their friends, their grief or joy was crush- ing. The humiliation of the Indian warriors was complete, even the sulky Delawares from the Scioto and White rivers bringing in their captives. ^'^ ^ Early Western Travels, I. 295 scq. The full Jounml of Capt. Tbomas ]Morris is printed. It is the best source on this event. '^^ BouqveVs Expedition Against the Ohio Indians (Cincinnati, 1868). This is documentary. THE ENGLISH PERIOD 37 § 9 The Journey of George Croghan After an expedition had failed to reach the Illinois country by way of the Mississippi river in 1764, Gen. Thomas Gage, who commanded in America, determined to send a party to that region by way of Fort Pitt. For this purpose he chose the able Indian agent, George Croghan, deputy for Sir William Johnson, and the most experienced Indian agent on the western frontier. ^^ With a small party in two boats, he left Fort Pitt May 15, 1765, and in twenty-two days reached the mouth of the Wabash, not- ing carefully in his journal the appearance of the country and the attractions for settlers. The expedition was five days in passing down the Ohio river along the southern boundary of Indiana. The first night camp was made at the Falls. The river was very low and Croghan observed that the Falls were little more than a rapid, which could be passed easily at ordinary stages of water. At the mouth of the Wabash he found a breastwork built, as he sup- posed, by the Indians. The Wabash, he noted, ran through the finest countries of the world. Hemp, he observed, might be raised in immense quantities. All the bottoms were covered with red and white mulberry trees. Having dropped down the river a few miles lower to dispatch cour- iers to St. Ange at Chartres, the party was attacked about daybreak by a band of Kickapoos and Mascoutins. Two white men and three Indians were killed at the first fire, all the rest being wounded but two white men and one In- dian. At first the attacking party was mistaken for south- ern Indians, but as soon as the Shawnee guide recognized them he censured them boldly, telling them that all the northern Indians would band together to avenge the insult. The red warriors hurried their prisoners through the forest to Vincennes, where they arrived June 15. "On my arrival," wrote Croghan, "I found a village of about eighty or ninety French families settled on the east 11 Croglian's Journal is priutecl in Documcuts Relating to the Colonial History of New Yor7t% VII, 779-7S8 ; Hildretl), Pioneer History of the Ohio Valley; Butler's History of Kentucky, appendix; Early Western Travels, I, 126. (4) 38 HISTORY OF INDIANA side of the river, being one of the finest situations that can be found. The country is level and clear and the soil very- rich, producing wheat and tobacco. I think the tobacco better than that in Virginia. The French inhabitants hereabouts are an idle, lazy people, a parcel of renegados from Canada and much worse than the Indians. As the savages took from me a considerable quantity of gold and silver the French traders extorted from them $45 for a pound of Vermillion. Here is likewise a village of Pianke- shaws, who were much displeased with the party that took me, telling them they had started a war for which their women and children would have reason to cry. * * * Post Vincent is a place of great consequence for trade, be- ing a fine hunting country all along the Wabash and too far for the Indians who reside hereabouts to go either to the Illinois or elsewhere to fetch their necessaries." Croghan dispatched letters to St. Ange, commander at Fort Chartres, but he was not permitted to write to the English commander at Pittsburgh. He was convinced that the French at Vincennes were encouraging the Indians in their hostility to the English. The Kickapoos, it seems, delivered some scalps and a portion of the booty taken from Croghan's partj'' to the French and received the promised reward. The Piankeshaws refused to have anything to do with the Indians who had captured Croghan. Croghan left Vincennes June 17, on horseback. His way led through what is now Sullivan and Vigo counties, where he noted the great fertility of the meadows — the "Piankeshaw Hunting Grounds." On these prairies he saw bear, deer, and buffaloes in countless numbers. He reached Ouiatanon June 23, 1765. Ouiatanon was on the Wabash near where Lafayette now stands. There were fourteen French families in the stockade fort, which stood on the north side of the river. The Kickapoo and Mascoutin warriors who had captured Croghan lived in near-by villages. The older members of the Kickapoos censured the young bucks, but laid the blame on the French, who, they said, had planned the outrage. Croghan remarked on this occasion: "The French have THE ENGLISH PERIOD 39 a great influence over these Indians and never fail in tell- ing them many lies to the prejudice of his Majesty's inter- ests."^- The country roundabout was particularly fine. The post had always been a very considerable trading place; for the great plenty of furs had originally induced its establishment. Croghan said it was the first post built on the Wabash. As usual Croghan remarked the resources of the country. Across the river from the fort ran a high bank in which were several outcropping veins of coal. On top of the bluff were large meadows cleared for several miles. These had been called barren savannas, but at the time they were covered with wild hemp ten feet high. Croghan remained at Ouiatanon from June 23 to July 25, meeting deputations from all the surrounding tribes and making treaties of peace. July 4 to 8 he was in con- ference with the Weas, Piankeshaws of Vermillion town, Kickapoos and Mascoutins. July 11 came the Illinois with Francois Maisonville as their interpreter. On the eight- eenth Croghan started to the Mississippi to meet Pontiac; but that chieftain with a large band of Senecas, Delawares and Shawnees was already near Ouiatanon and Croghan returned for a conference with them. Everything was arranged satisfactorily with them and treaties of peace confirmed. After settling everything with the natives, and being freed from his captors, Croghan left Ouiatanon July 25, 1765, and proceeded up the Wabash to Eel river. Six miles up this stream he found a small Twightwee or Miami vil- lage pleasantly located on the river bank — the home of the Eel River Miamis. For four more days he traveled up Eel river, then crossed over to the portage path from the Wa- bash to the Maumee. On August 1 he reached the Miami village on the St. Joseph about one-fourth of a mile up from its mouth. The Indians came out to meet him, greeting him kindly. An old English flag which he had given them at Fort Pitt was hoisted. With most of the Twightwee or Miami warriors Croghan was personally acquainted. The navigation, he observed, from here to Ouiatanon was very 12 Early Western Travels, I, 144. 40 HISTORY OF INDIANA difficult in low water, but easy in times of freshet. Under the latter conditions the trip could be made in three days. On the east side of the river, near its mouth, stood a little tumbledown stockade — all that then remained of Post Miami. The Indian village consisted of forty or fifty cabins, together with nine or ten French houses occupied by French traders. Croghan again describes the French as a lazy, indolent, mischief-breeding pack. They were refu- gees from Detroit. They had aided the Indians in the late uprising and later, fearing punishment, had withdrawn to Post Miami. Croghan urged that they be removed where they would have no influence over the Indians. He was impressed with the natural resources and beauty of the country around Post Miami. After the usual conferences, and after the Indians had delivered up their prisoners, Croghan set out for Detroit August 6, having spent about three months among the inhabitants of the Wabash Valley. ^^ § 10 England Takes Possession and Organizes the Country St. Ange had been governing the Illinois country since the departure of Neyon de Villiers in 1764. He was sur- rounded by a lawless crowd of thieving savages and con- spiring French. He had orders to surrender the post to the English as soon as they should appear. In January, 1764, Maj. Arthur Loftus set out from Mobile with 351 men from the Twenty-second Regiment. Sixty of them were to occupy Fort Massac and the re- mainder were to garrison Kaskaskia and Fort Chartres. This expedition was defeated and turned back by the Tonica Indians at Fort Adams, two hundred and forty miles above New Orleans. It was the encouragement from this defeat that impelled Pontiac to refuse the offers of Thomas Morris at Fort Miami in the autumn of 1764. ^^ In February, 1765, John Ross, an English officer, arrived at Fort Chartres from Mobile, having come directly north to 13 Early Western Travels. I, 150. 14 Carter. The IlUnois Count nj, 36. THE ENGLISH PERIOD 41 the Ohio river and thence down to the Illinois Country. He was disappointed in the temper of the Indians and was for- tunate in escaping to New Orleans. Meanwhile the English at Fort Pitt were waiting eagerly to hear of the results of Croghan's expedition. As soon as the latter was sure of his position at Ouiatanon, he sent a messenger to Fort Pitt. Capt. Thomas Sterling was ready and at once set out from Fort Pitt to Fort Chartres, in Illinois, with 125 Scotch Highlanders of the Forty-second Regiment. Sterling arrived at Chartres October 9, 1765. St. Ange, the French commander, withdrew to the west side of the Mississippi, leaving all the northwest country in the hands of the English. The land of Indiana was under the jurisdiction of Captain Sterling. Fort Chartres was the largest of the French inland fortresses. It was a fortress, the others mere posts. It was designed to be the headquarters for the French civil and military command of the upper valley. It was built almost two miles from the banks of the Mississippi on the road from Kaskaskia to Cahokia, about twenty miles from the latter. The construction was begun in 1718 by Bois- briant, governor of Illinois, and finished in two or three years. It was built of stone with bastions and towers, donjon and magazine. Its portholes and heavy cannon were out of harmony v/ith its surroundings and an insult to the majestic river, on whose banks it stood. As if re- senting the intended domination the river set towards it, and seven years after the English took possession, under- mined its walls.i-^ A massive ruin still marks its location. There seemed no hurry to take possession of the Wa- bash posts. Not till 1777 was there any English authority on Indiana soil and the story of Indiana, meanwhile is in- separably woven into the larger politics of the Northwest. England found herself in possession of more territory at the close of the French and Indian War than her king and ministry could well govern. Their vast conquests in America were divided by the Proclamation of October 7, 15 Carter, The Illinois Country, index; Winsor. Narrative and Critical History, VI, 702. 42 HISTORY OF INDIANA 1763, into four provinces: Quebec, East Florida, West Florida, Grenada. The territory north of the Ohio was not included in any one of these. An order of the king forbade the colonial governors to sell lands to anyone be- yond the headwaters of the rivers flowing into the Atlantic. This order came to be known as the "Proclamation of 1763." Until the king's further pleasure was known the lands of the West were to be used, as formerly, as a hunt- ing ground for the Indians. This was only a temporary disposition of the vast royal domain. There was no manifest intention on the part of the ministry to set the designated region aside permanently as a home for the Indians. Such a policy would have been in direct violation of English precedents. On the other hand the brutal character of the traders and their capacity for stirring up the savages to war made some such effort necessary. All Indian traders were required by the procla- mation to be licensed and to give security for their good behavior. The purchase of land from the Indians on pri- vate account was strictly forbidden. All interlopers or trespassers were ordered to be seized and sent out of the country. The policy was timely, though some of its details could not be carried out.^^ Croghan's description of the fertile lands northwest of the Ohio roused the cupidity of the land-hungry English.^" One of the earliest of a series of giant land speculations was planned by Sir William Johnson, Indian agent for America, and Governor Franklin of New Jersey, a son of Benjamin Franklin. Governor Franklin wrote his father in London and the latter joined eagerly. General Gage and some wealthy Philadelphia merchants also entered into the scheme. They petitioned the king for a grant of 63,000,000 acres lying between Lake Erie and the Mississippi and the Fox and Wisconsin rivers and the Ohio and Wabash. This 16 The docnment is given, together with a map iu the Annual Regis- ter, 1763. 20S: Gentleman's Magazine, 1763, 477; Alvord, "Genesis of the Proclamation of 1763," in Michigan Pioneer and Historical Collec- tions, XXXVI, 25. 17 The English magazines like the Gentleman's and the Annual Regis- ter give clear indications of this widespread interest. THE ENGLISH PERIOD 43 settlement, they urged, would secure the country against a French uprising and also protect the western frontier from the Indians. Shelburne urged it upon the Board of Trade — especially emphasizing the necessity of a farming population to support the garrisons and at the same time to furnish a wider market for British manufactures. The Lords of Trade refused to grant the favor. The royal gov- ernors in America generally opposed it for the reason that it would only serve to draw men from the older colonies, thus weakening the already distressed colonial govern- ments. A second attempt was made by a company headed by the London banker, Thomas Walpole, and called the Walpole Company. Franklin was interested in this as well as George Washington, Governor Pownall of Massachusetts, Governor Dinwiddle of Virginia, and Col. George Mercer, then in London. The Tory colonial minister. Lord Hillsborough, had other plans, and not even the prophetic eloquence of Burke or the solid sense of Franklin could shake the stub- born minister. One of the tracts of lands compre- hended in this prospective grant of 2,400,000 acres was called "Indiana." In 1769 Dr. Lee of Virginia and thirty- two other Virginians, the great patriots of the Revolution, including the Washingtons, together with two Londoners, organized the Mississippi Land Company. The hope of the company was a grant of 2,500,000 acres of western lands around the mouths of the Ohio and Wabash rivers. The whole scheme ended in the pigeon holes of the Board of Trade. The Illinois Land Company through its agent, William Murray, a trader in the Illinois Country, acquired an Indian claim to two vast tracts bordering on the Mississippi and embracing the soil of half the present State of Illinois. The cession was obtained from ten Kaskaskia chieftains at a council held at Kaskaskia July 5, 1773, while Hugh Lord was the commandant. Two years later, Louis Viviat, an- other trader of the Illinois Country, bought for the Wabash Land Company a tract of land lying on both banks of the Wabash. This purchase comprehended about 60,000 square 44 HISTORY OF INDIANA miles of territory. The price paid in each case was a few trinkets of trifling value. Several other land companies were organized during the period to exploit the fertile western lands. This spec- ulative fever has never left the American people in their dealings with the public lands. Nor must we forget in this connection that there was truth in the beautiful periods of Burke, who saw in vision the western waves of migra- tion lapping over the crests of the Alleghanies and trickling dovv^n the valleys beyond, oblivious of kings and procla- mations, i'' Thousands of hunters, traders and squatters crossed the Appalachians in defiance of law and made their homes in the Indian country. It was soon realized that the Proclamation of 1733 kept out only the best persons. Following the advice of Lord Hillsborough, v/ho, in turn, follov/ed Col. Guy Carleton, commander at Quebec, and his Svvdss lieutenant, Cramahe, the king decided on the Quebec Act as the one measure that would settle amicably all these American troubles. It would, he thought, pacify the French, who were the only legitimate settlers of the North- west, by giving them their French religion and civil law. It would give a government to the western country by plac- ing it under the jurisdiction of the Province of Quebec. It would also put an end to land speculations encouraged by royal governors. It v/as enacted in 1774. It did pacify Canada, and it gave a legality to government, but it utterly failed to stop western migration. It effectually destroyed the love of the leading Virginians for their king. More than any other act of the king, the Quebec Act prepared the Old Diminion for rebellion. By its terms all the lands north of the Ohio, east of the Mississippi and south of the Great Lakes were attached to Quebec. ^^ 18 George Hetiry AJden, Neic Governments West of the Alleghanies Before 1780, in Bulletins of University of Wisconsin, II, gives a good discussion of these ianrl comrnnies. See liis references: also Cai'ter, TJie Illinois Country, cb. 6. Tlie petition of the Mississippi Company is given in the appendix to The Illinois Conntn/, ](!"). seq. 19 See Statutes at Larue. Fourteenth George III, oh, 83. Most of the discussions in American history seem to have been by men who have not read the statute. Tliere is no ground in the law for anticip.iting the storm of opposition aroused in America. THE ENGLISH PERIOD 45 During Pontiac's war the English were unable to relieve the French commanders in the Northwest. Neyon de Vil- liers was at Chartres and the veteran, St. Ange, at Vin- cennes. Villiers left his post early in 1764 for New Or- leans and with him went a large number of settlers. He ordered St. Ange to come and take charge of the fortress of Chartres. When the latter left Vincennes he turned the government of the post over to Deroite de Richardville. After taking possession of Chartres, the English were in no hurry to come to Vincennes; and nothing but the exig- encies of another war brought it a garrison. The stockade posts at Vincennes, Ouiatanon and Post Miami rotted down and disappeared. A more forlorn settlement could not have been found in America than those on the soil of Indiana just preceding the Revolution. Authority at Vincennes finally settled down to the notary, Raumer, who ran away with the records. To add to their misery the settlers re- ceived orders from General Gage, toward the close of 1772, to vacate the territory; for it had been temporarily set aside by the Proclamation of 1763 as a hunting ground for the Indians. It seemed the settlement would disappear, and the valley of the Wabash revert entirely to its ancient savagery. The fur trade became more and more lawless and unprofitable. Fortunately the order of General Gage was not approved by the king and the inhabitants were not molested. By the Quebec Act Vincennes came under the jurisdic- tion of the commander of Detroit. Accordingly, early in 1777 — there seemed no great hurry — Lieutenant Governor Abbott was sent by Governor Hamilton from Detroit to re- build the stockades on the Wabash, and organize a band of French chasseurs to attack the back settlements of Vir- ginia. Abbott found large numbers of Indians, whom he encouraged in their murderous raids on the western fron- tier; but the French had no stomachs to join England against the Americans. Abbott built a stockade fort at Vincennes and mounted some cannons, sent over by Roche- blave from Fort Gage, formerly Chartres, at Kaskaskia. He remained and governed the people till January 30, 1778, 46 HISTORY OF INDIANA when he returned to Canada, leaving Vincennes to fall help- lessly into the hands of Virginia. The only business of the country worth mentioning was the fur trade. Under the provisions of the Proclamation of 1763 only English traders were allowed in the field. Each trader was required to have a license from a colonial governor. A superintendent of Indian affairs for the coun- try north of the Ohio had charge. The commissary at each post was a petty justice with jurisdiction over the petty quarrels arising among the traders. Effort was made to center the trade as much as possible around the garrison post. At each post was a commissary, an interpreter, and a smith. The commissary and superintendent had power to establish a uniform price for all goods used in the trade. For all their plans and pains the fur trade was a lawless business engaged in by the English, French and Spanish, with and without license. Liquor was carried into the western forests by every avenue. Indians were made drunk, maltreated and left to take vengeance on helpless pioneer families.20 20 Carter, The Illinois Cotmtry, ch. V. CHAPTER III the conquest by virginia 1778-1779 § 11 The American Revolution and the Indians Scarcely had the American Revolution broken out when the English began to utilize the warlike energy of the Indians against their rebellious colonists. King George had in 1763 by a royal proclamation set aside temporarily the vast valleys west of the mountains as a hunting ground for his red children. He had ordered the colonists to stay on the eastern side of the mountains. But as soon as the French and Indian war had ended, bands of settlers began to locate in the valleys of the westward-flowing rivers. In a vain attempt to stay this tide of migration the Indians had sustained the crushing defeat at Point Pleasant, Vir- ginia, 1774, and the loss in that battle of some of their bravest chiefs. Early in the Revolutionary War the Tories of western New York had united with the British agents in raising the powerful Iroquois. The terrible devastation of the Wy- oming and Cherry Valleys followed. That western Indians engaged in these raids is shown by the fate of Frances Slocum, who was captured by the Miamis and brought to their home on the Mississinewa.^ The destruction of the Iroquois Confederacy by General Sullivan in 1779 drove the wreck of that nation, together with the Delaware refugees, back on the Miami tribes, with whom they later joined in war against the Americans. Col. Henry Hamilton was the English commander at De- troit. On him falls the disgrace of arousing the western Indians against Virginia. He advised Lord George Ger- 1 Jacob Piatt Dunn, True Indian mories, 213. 48 HISTORY OF INDIANA maine, the English war minister, to furnish arms and am- munition as well as suitable leaders for the Indians, and directed them to make a diversion on the Virginia and Pennsylvania frontiers. The Indians were placed in com- mand of such partisan outlaws as Capt. Henry Bird, and Simon Girty, and then ordered to do no violence. They were directed to watch the Ohio river especially and de- stroy all Americans attempting to pass. Hamilton report- ed that the Indians in his district, Detroit, had brought in 107 prisoners and 110 scalps during the year 1778. These were paid for by the commander as if they had been so many beaver skins. The leading tribe engaged in these depredations was the Miami, whose home was on the soil of Indiana. They had no reason to join in the contest be- tween England and her colonies. There had been war along the border, but it had been led by his Majesty the King's officers, and the resentment of the Indians should have fallen as quickly on the British as the Americans. The ruin of the northwestern tribes may be traced back to this unnatural policy of the British in 1776. § 12 The Capture of Kaskaskia Among the American frontiersmen there was only one sentiment toward the Indians. That was retaliation. For awhile their vengeance fell on the Indians alone. Such men as Daniel Boone, Simon Kenton, Lewis "Wetzel and Adam Poe hunted the Indians as they had hunted the wild animals. Meanwhile dangers, instead of lessening, multi- plied on the frontier. It is to the credit of George Rogers Clark that he not only recognized the English, at the west- ern posts, as the source of the devastation on the frontiers, but he laid plans to capture them. Clark was one of the early settlers of Kentucky. When a county government was organized by the Kentuckians, he first represented it in the Virginia legislature. It was not primarily as a legislator that he visited the government of Virginia in the closing days of 1777. December 10 of that year he laid before Governor Patrick Henry of Virginia THE CONQUEST BY VIRGINIA 49 his plan for conquering the English posts. Virginia was using her means and men freely in supporting Washington in the struggle around New York, but Governor Henry- could not fail to catch the spirit of Clark and sympathize with his hopes. After calling into consultation three of the leading men of the State, he gave Clark permission to enroll seven companies of militia and draw on the State for 12,000 pounds to defray expenses. Clark thus prepared not only to stop the inroads of the Indians, but at the same time to conquer for his State a western empire. Colonel Clark was given two sets of instructions. One, intended for the public, and especially for the Virginia legislature, directed him to repair to Kentucky with his army to defend the new settlements against the savages. The other instructions directed him to organize his army with all secrecy and dispatch for an attack on Kaskaskia or Vincennes. With characteristic quickness Clark made his preparations and set out for Pittsburgh January 4, 1778. He authorized his old friends and neighbors, Leon- ard Helm and Joseph Bowman, each to raise a company and join him on February 1 at Redstone Old Fort. Wil- liam Smith was likewise sent to recruit a company on the Holston and join the other troops at the Falls of the Ohio. Nearer the frontier, Clark secured the services of Capt. William Harrod, who also raised a company, part of whom were from Pennsylvania. The Old Dominion furnished m.any gallant soldiers during the Revolution, but none were better than these modern Argonauts who set sail from Pittsburgh in May, 1778, to capture a fortress 1,000 miles away. Each man was a skillful hunter, an accurate marks- man with his flintlock rifle, and accustomed to long jour- neys and all kinds of privations. Nearly all were Vir- ginians, the leaders as well as most of the men being old acquaintances. Fear was unknown to them and yet, like brave men, they were cautious. Clark broke up his rendezvous at Redstone May 12, 1778. At Pittsburgh and Wheeling he stopped on his way and took on supplies. Gen. Edward Hand, who command- ed at Pittsburgh, gave all assistance he could. At the 50 HISTORY OF INDIANA Kanawha, Clark found the garrison in consternation over an Indian attack and was earnestly besought to join in the pursuit. He was not to be turned aside from his purpose, however, and continued on his way down the Ohio, followed and harassed every mile by the Indians, but never caught off his guard. At the mouth of the Kentucky he stopped and communicated with the settlements up that river, but decided to go on further and build the fortification for his base of supplies at the Falls. From this post he could more easily check Indian incursions from the north side of the Ohio. He reached the Falls about June 1. Besides the sol- diers, there was a number of families who had wished to come to Kentucky and had chosen this opportunity in order to avoid the murderous bands of Indians who then infested all the roads to that country. Some of these were doubt- less the families of soldiers enlisted under Clark. After looking over the situation carefully, Clark decided to for- tify Corn Island, just at the head of the Falls and nearest the Kentucky side. The land on the island he divided among the families, who soon had a crop of corn growing. Clark now began in earnest to drill his little army for the desperate work ahead. Disappointed in the number of men from the Holston country who joined him here, he found it necessary to call for aid on the Kentucky govern- ment, by whom another company, under Capt. John Mont- gomery, was ordered to report to him. All told. Colonel Clark now found himself in command of about 200 men. Having drilled them nearly a month, he called them to- gether and informed them of his plans. The following night a large number of the Holston men swam to the Ken- tucky bank and left for home. The remainder, about 175, started for Kaskaskia on the morning of June 24, a date made certain by the total eclipse of the sun that occurred that morning. Everything now depended on speed and secrecy. There was no doubt but that in a fight his men would give a good account of them- selves, but Clark was convinced that his only chance to capture Kaskaskia was by surprise. The Ohio river was then at good stage. The troops, doubling on the oars. THE CONQUEST BY VIRGINIA 51 rowed day and night. June 28 they landed on a small isl- and in the mouth of the Tennessee, where they quickly pre- pared for a dash across Illinois. It was thought to be im- possible to ascend the Mississippi without being discovered by some of the numerous traders or Indians passing up and down on that river. Clark had scarcely landed at the mouth of the Tennes- see, when a boat appeared with a party of hunters in it eight days only from Kaskaskia. Some, or perhaps all of them, joined the Virginians, and one of them, John Saunders, became the guide. After making every preparation and taking only as much baggage as if they were going on a hunting trip, the little army dropped down to within three miles of the deserted Fort Massac, hid their boats in a creek, and took the trail for Old Kaskaskia. The distance was about 120 miles. On the level prairies they were in danger of losing their way and only the experienced guide saved them from wandering. They made remarkable time, however. They left the Falls June 24, reached the Ten- nessee on the twenty-eighth, went on and hid their boats the same day. On the morning of the twenty-ninth they set out on the march and on the evening of July 4 reached Kaskaskia. If Colonel Clark is correct in saying he left the Falls on the twenty-sixth, the march is even more re- markable. In the first case they had traversed at least 400 miles in ten days. Through the wilderness of Illinois they traveled twenty-five miles per day. Colonel Clark had sent spies to the Illinois Country dur- ing the summer of 1777 and these had encouraged him to believe he could surprise the fort at Kaskaskia. The hunt- ers whom he had intercepted at the Tennessee also reported the garrison negligent in keeping lookouts. The French inhabitants were reported to be lukewarm in the British cause. There is good ground for the belief that Clark had confederates in the town who knew of his approach and had made preparations accordingly. At any rate, relying on this known friendly feeling among the French, Clark led his men to a farmhouse within a mile of the town but on the east side of the river, and finding boats ready to 52 HISTORY OF INDIANA hand, crossed over, reaching the outskirts of the town soon after dark. The conduct of the American soldiers on this occasion would have been creditable to regulars. They remained in the immediate vicinity until near midnight without being observed or creating any alarm. At that time they quietly secured all the approaches to the village, entered the fort, now called Fort Gage, and seized the com- mander, Philip de Rocheblave, whom they found asleep in his room. This done, there was noise enough. The citi- zens w^ere warned to keep off the streets and all were led to believe that an army of 1,000 men had possession. Thus without bloodshed, without the firing of a gun, even with- out a surrender, for Rocheblave and his men were spared that humiliation, this fortress, that had sufficient garrison and supplies to withstand a siege by a regiment of men, fell into the hands of less than 200 militia who had no other arms than their hunting rifles. Tradition has woven some beautiful stories around this feat of arms, but no authentic account gives any details. Most probably ene- mies of the English commandant joined Clark after dark and acted as guides.^ § 13 Pierre Gibault and the Capture of Vincennes As has alv/ays been the case in rural French villages, the priest was the principal man of the community. In their distress, now, the parishioners of Kaskaskia turned to Father Pierre Gibault, the priest. His request to call his people together once more before they were taken away as prisoners, for they expected to be driven away at last as the Acadians had been, was so readily granted by Colonel Clark that the priest at once became an admirer of the Virginian. When Clark, soon after, informed him that the French would not be molested in any manner, not even in the free exercise of their religion, the priest felt that it would be to his interest to aid the Virginians in all '■^ I'hUippe dc RocJichhirc and Roclicblarc Papers, Fergus Historical Scries, No. 34. The weakness of the garrison is apparent. An ac- count of the capture is given in the Laicrencchurg Palladium, March 20, 1830. THE CONQUEST BY VIRGINIA 53 ways possible. He did this the more graciously since he had no sympathy either for the English personally or for their cause. Accordingly, when he learned that the Ameri- can commander was contemplating an attack on Vin- cennes, he volunteered to go and win the French over to the American cause. Clark had brought with him a copy of the recent Treaty of Alliance between France and the American Nation, which was now a great aid in dealing with the French at Kaskaskia and Vincennes. As soon as Clark had secured all the other Illinois set- tlements he turned his attention to Vincennes. Gibault informed him that Abbott, the English commander, had lately gone to Detroit and that there was, at the time, no English garrison at the Old Post. Moreover, he said that he believed he could go to that place and by presenting the treaty between the two countries and explaining the courteous treatment received by the Kaskaskians, win them over to the American side. But Father Gibault, not wish- ing to seem to act in other than a spiritual capacity, asked that some one be allowed to accompany him to act as the political agent. However, he assured Clark that he would attend personally to all the details of the business. As a companion on this embassy with Father Gibault, Dr. Jean Laffont was chosen. Gibault has, heretofore, received all the credit for this achievement, but the letter to the inhab- itants, as well as the instructions, was given to Laffont. The report to Clark attributes all the work at Vincennes to Laffont, while Gibault, ten years later, in a letter to his bishop at Quebec, denied having taken any hand in winning the Vincennes people from the British allegiance. Doubtless all the French needed was an opportunity to desert their hereditary foes. A friend of Colonel Clark secretly ac- companied the delegation. Clark prepared an address to the French authorizing and directing them to organize their own militia and garrison the fort. Thus prepared, this little party set out from Kaskaskia, July 14, to capture Vincennes, a post which Clark had feared to approach a fortnight earlier. The English along the whole northern border had been momentarily discon- (5) 54 HISTORY OF INDIANA certed by the capture of General Burgoyne at Saratoga. They were now expecting the Americans to attack Detroit from Pittsburgh. The reverse had thrown them on the defensive, for the time, and all but destroyed their prestige among the Indians. On this account Laffont and Father Gibault found no British troops at Vincennes and likewise none of their Indian allies. A few partisans had been left as spies by Abbott, but these withdrew as soon as they learned the purpose of Laffont and the attitude of the French inhabitants. Gibault found no difficulty in per- suading his parishioners. Two days after he arrived he called his little flock together in the village church, w^here in sacred solemnity he administered to them the oath of allegiance to the United States. The animating effects of freedom were seen immediately. A garrison under an of- ficer of popular choice was stationed in the fort. The American flag was displayed from the staff of the fort to the wondering Indians. By August 1 Laffont and Gibault were back at Kaskaskia with the good news. Communica- tions with Kentucky were now established and Clark felt reasonably secure in his conquests. This series of remarkable successes might have thrown a less vigilant commander than Clark off his guard, but there was no time for nursing his vanity. He now con- trolled three considerable towns each requiring a garrison. Governor Henry, indeed, had so worded Clark's instruc- tions as to leave him at liberty to dismantle the forts and return with the captured cannon to the fort at the Falls of the Ohio, but this would have reduced the whole enter- prise from a magnificent conquest to an unexpectedly suc- cessful Indian foray. Such an idea was a stranger to Clark's ambition. To hold the conquests already achieved would require a full regiment, and the time of service of the small number of men then in Illinois would expire within a few days. Clark prevailed on most of them to re- enlist, and sent those who wished to return home to con- duct the prisoners to Virginia. The places of those who did not reenlist were quickly filled by French volunteers. Maj. Joseph Bowman, a cousin of Colonel Clark, was sent THE CONQUEST BY VIRGINIA 55 with a small garrison to take charge of Cahokia. Capt. John Williams was placed in immediate command of Fort Gage at Kaskaskia. The most dangerous command was assigned to Capt. Leonard Helm, the oldest and most ex- perienced of this little group of officers. Helm was a Vir- ginian, perhaps forty years old, who had spent most of his life as a scout among the Indians. He understood In- dian character and was well suited for the difficult com- mand at Vincennes. A few Americans and Creoles constituted his garrison. The French received their new commandant joyfully and the Piankeshaw chief. Tobacco, or the "Grand Door," as he was also called, in allusion to his tribe's position at the mouth of the Wabash, was soon in league with the Vir- ginians. Indian chiefs came from many of the neighbor- ing tribes and made peace with the Americans, but the In- dians of the Upper Wabash remained hostile. Their atti- tude was traced to the influence of the British agent, Pierre Joseph Celoron, who was at this time stationed at Ouia- tanon. Clark determined to capture this man or drive him away. For this purpose he sent Capt. John Bailey to join Helm in an expedition to the Wea Towns. When Celoron heard of this he fled, leaving his Indian allies to their fate. Helm surprised the stockade at Ouiatanon while the In- dians v/ere in council, and captured the larger part of them. After making a treaty of friendship with them he released his prisoners and returned to Vincennes. Made bold by the impunity with which he had carried on his operations against the western settlers, and know- ing something must be performed to restore British su- premacy over the natives, Lieut, Henry Hamilton was pre- paring to make an attack on Fort Pitt, when, on August 8, 1778, Francis Maisonville arrived at Detroit with the astounding intelligence that 300 Virginians had surprised and captured the garrison at Kaskaskia. Hamilton at once notified Gen. Guy Carleton at Quebec of the disaster and asked permission to march against the Virginians at once. He was a man of great energy, and without wait- ing for orders from his superior at Quebec began collect- 56 HISTORY OF INDIANA ing men and supplies for the expedition. Agents were sent with war belts to all the friendly tribes. One of them, carried by Celoron, we have already met at Ouiatanon. By October 7 the British expedition against Vincennes was under way. It numbered about 200 British and French and 300 Indians. Crossing Lake Erie in a snowstorm that all but wrecked the boats, the troops ascended the Maumee. On the twenty-fourth they reached the portage at Fort Wayne. Progress was slow. They carried 97,000 pounds of baggage. The rivers were low and the ice had already formed on the Upper Wabash. The boats grounded and the baggage had to be carried for long distances over the shallows. The historian is tempted to say that the British armies would have been successful in the Revolution had it not been for their baggage trains. The fleet of fifteen large bateaux at last reached Ouiatanon, where the com- mander delayed long enough to hold a formal council with the Indians. Small scouting parties were sent ahead to watch all the approaches to Vincennes and cut off all com- munication. These parties succeeded in capturing Cap- tain Helm's scouts. Learning from them that the garrison at Vincennes was not strong enough to resist an attack, Major Hay was sent in advance to occupy the town. He decided not to attack the fort at once, and by the time the main British force arrived, Helm's garrison, if he ever had one, had melted away. Captain Helm reported that when the Brit- ish came in sight he had not so much as four men on whom he could rely. Presumably his garrison, realizing the use- lessness of an attempt at resistance, mingled with the in- habitants and later joined Clark when he came to the res- cue. There was no opposition. Captain Helm made the best bluff possible with his one small cannon and then sur- rendered at discretion. The surrender took place Decem- ber 17, 1778. The British had made the distance of over 500 miles in seventy-two days, an average of seven miles per day. Again the Frenchmen of Vincennes were called to- gether and the oath of allegiance to Great Britain admin- THE CONQUEST BY VIRGINIA 57 58 HISTORY OF INDIANA istered, Hamilton destroyed all the liquor, and even the gaming tables, in town, and placed the people under mar- tial law. Having decided that it was impossible to cap- ture Kaskaskia on account of the season, he accordingly went into winter quarters. A small scouting party was sent to secure information concerning the Americans with instructions to capture Colonel Clark, if possible, by watch- ing the roads about Kaskaskia. The fort at Vincennes was remodeled. A large stock- ade was built and the ground inside covered with gravel. Two blockhouses were built of strong timbers with open- ings above the stockade enclosure for the cannon. Having decided to go into winter quarters, the British general dis- missed his Indian allies and sent all his Detroit militia home, retaining only about 100 men. Many of the latter men were dispatched with Indian war parties to watch the Ohio river and destroy all Americans found; others were sent on a mission to the southern Indians to raise them against the Tennessee frontier. All were instructed to be in readiness for the grand council at the mouth of the Ten- nessee, and the campaign in the spring, when Hamilton hoped to lead 1,000 well-armed troops against the Illinois posts, then sweep eastv/ard through Kentucky, and cap- ture Pittsburgh. Among the French in the Illinois Country there was none more popular than the wealthy trader, Francis Vigo of St. Louis. Vigo was a Sardinian who had come to America in a Spanish regiment. He now undertook a trip to Vin- cennes, partly no doubt on business of his own and partly to gain information for Clark regarding the conditions at that place. He left Kaskaskia December 18, ignorant of the fact that the British had retaken Vincennes, and a few days later was captured on the Embarrass river by one of Ham- ilton's scouting parties. After the Indians had relieved him of his horse, money and arms, and carried him to Vin- cennes, he was thrown into prison. For some unknown reason Hamilton allowed him to return home on promise of going directly to St. Louis. He reached Kaskaskia by THE CONQUEST BY VIRGINIA 59 way of St. Louis January 27, 1779, bringing the first satis- factory report Clark had received of conditions at Vin- cennes since the capture of Helm. A rumored attack on Kaskaskia had already caused Clark to concentrate his forces at that place. He now had one of three alterna- tives: he could abandon his conquests and return to the Falls; he could remain and risk being captured in the spring; or he could take desperate chances on capturing his enemy now in comfortable vdnter quarters. It is the imperishable glory of Clark that he chose the latter. He decided to risk everything in an immediate campaign against Hamilton. Volunteers were called for and a company of French Creoles enlisted for the expedition. No reinforcements had been sent him from Virginia, nor had he so much as heard from Governor Henry for almost a year. The fu- ture of the Northwest was, fortunately, in the hands of no common soldier. Genius does not ask for, nor wait on, authority. The weather was damp and murky, the flooded streams covered the level prairies. The travelers sank ankle-deep in the sodden leaves of the forest or the grass of the prairie; but fortunately the weather was not cold. § 14 The Last Capture of Vincennes Colonel Clark was at Prairie Du Rocher when the rumor reached him that the British were already in Illinois. Leaving the ballroom, where he was being entertained, at midnight and sending a horseman to Cahokia, sixty miles away, to summon Bowman and his troops, he left imme- diately for Kaskaskia, arriving there before daylight. Al- though Cahokia was seventy-five miles away, Bowman, with his soldiers, joined his commander the following even- ing. Fort Gage was put in readiness for a siege. As soon as Vigo arrived with information that the British had re- tired to winter quarters, Clark began to organize his ex- pedition. The French freely enlisted for the attack and means for equipment were found by the aid of Colonel Vigo. 60 HISTORY OF INDIANA A large rowboat, capable of carrying fifty men and half a dozen small cannon, was equipped and placed under the command of John Rogers, a cousin of Colonel Clark. This boat was to drop down to the mouth of the Ohio and ascend that stream and the Wabash to within a few miles of Vincennes, where it should await the troops marching over- land. The energy and determination of Clark quickly rekin- dled the enthusiasm of all around him. French and Ameri- cans alike entered heartily into the campaign against Vin- cennes. Clark cliose a small band of men, one hundred and thirty of the best, and, escorted by the Creole population, the girls especially joining in the parade and the priest adding his blessing, set out on the difficult march overland. As soon as they were out of town, strict discipline was en- forced for a few days. Then the long march of 240 miles began in hard earnest. As was customary with Clark, he required his men to take as little baggage as circumstances would permit. There was no real hurry and Clark made the mistake, almost fatal, of reaching the Wabash before his gunboat, the "Willing," could reach its destination. As soon as the little army got clear of the settlements, disci- pline was relaxed and for a week there was more the ap- pearance of a hunting party than of serious war. The troops left Kaskaskia February 7, and in ten days reached the Embarrass, near where Lawrenceville, Illinois, now stands. They found this river impassable and, turning to the right, struck the Wabash eight or ten miles below Vincennes. The commander of the "Willing" found the Wabash at flood and the main current, which he had to follow on account of the timber, very swift. It was thus impossible to get to the appointed rendezvous on time. In the meantime, Clark's army was reduced to the point of despair. The bottom lands were drowned and there were no boats. While the men were making dugouts, prepara- tory to crossing the river, some Frenchmen from Vin- cennes, presumably duck-hunters, were captured — or very probably they were Clark's friends. With the canoes thus captured and the dugouts they had built, the men crossed THE CONQUEST BY VIRGINIA 61 over to the east side of the Wabash. This was on Febru- ary 22. Except for one deer the army had had no pro- visions for three days. The horses had either been killed or left on the Illinois side of the Wabash. In vain did Colo- nel Clark send down the river to learn tidings of his boat. He had hoped to reach Vincennes by a half-day's march after crossing the Wabash; but now an endless waste of water was all his eyes could see, with here and there at intervals of three or four miles the crests of hills rising above the flood. The Frenchmen discouraged Clark's men by saying that it was utterly impossible to get to Vin- cennes without boats. Something, however, had to be done, so the little army set out in Indian file, Clark in the van, Bowman in the rear, and after wading three miles in water waist deep, reached a few acres of dry land and camped for the night. There was not a bite to eat. Morning brought only a renewal of the toilsome struggle. This day's march led them through a growth of underbrush almost covered with water which made the wading doubly difficult. Finally they came to a place where the water gradually deepened. The men in the dugouts reported it too deep to wade. There was no hope in return. The men gathered around their commander and it seemed their expedition was at an end. Colonel Clark hesitated only for a moment, then pouring out some powder in his hand, wet it, black- ened his face, and in desperate mockery gave the Indian war-whoop as he plunged into the water. His followers struck up a song. The water was already up to their chins, when some of the soldiers, perhaps Frenchmen who were well acquainted with the land, struck a path with their feet. This led them over the highest ground, thus en- abling them to wade to a hill on which was an old sugar camp. Here they found about half an acre of dry land, on which they camped for the night. Their courage was well- nigh gone. There was no food and the night was cold. The morning sun rose bright and clear. Instead of breakfast the men listened to a spirited appeal from their captain. Vincennes was in sight but separated from them by six miles of water, covered in many places by a thin 62 HISTORY OF INDIANA crust of ice. Clark did not wait for parley, but when he had finished his harangue, drew his sword and led the way. The water was shoulder deep. There were no trees nor brush to support the weakened soldiers. Major Bowman, instructed to put to deatii any man who refused to march, with twenty Virginians, brought up the rear. The lake before them was the Horseshoe Plain, four miles wide, cov- ered with three or four feet of water. On the other side was a forest. Toward this they worked their way. The canoes and dugouts plied along the line picking up the weakest. Each strong man was supporting a weaker. Finally they reached the timber only to find the water deeper. A few of the staunchest were able to make this last short distance, where the water came to their chins. The others clung to trees and logs till they were picked up by the boats. Many, when out of the water, w^ere unable to stand. The leaders built fires as soon as they reached the island and as the others came ashore they were alter- nately exercised and warmed until they regained their strength. To add to their good fortune a canoe in charge of some squaws was seen and overhauled. Some buffalo meat, tallow, corn, and kettles to cook them in, were thus obtained and a light meal of broth prepared. The spirits of the soldiers revived with the passing of the danger. Vin- cennes laj^ in full view across a narrow plain. The lower parts of this intervening plain were covered with water. Some Frenchmen were out on the water shoot- ing ducks. A party of Clark's Creoles brought into camp one of these fowlers, from whom Clark learned the condi- tions at Vincennes. So far, the coming of the Americans had not been discovered. There were about 200 white men in Vincennes and an equal number of Indian warriors. The situation as it presented itself to Clark was not without dif- ficulty. An indiscriminate attack on the town would throw all its inhabitants together into an opposing force more than double the Americans. A surprise was risky even if it could be effected. It would leave those who sympathized with the Americans, and Clark knew they were numerous, in doubt as to what to do. THE CONQUEST BY VIRGINIA 63 Clark did the only sensible thing under the circum- stances. He sent a letter by the captured fowler to his friends in Vincennes, apprising them of his arrival and warning them to keep off the streets and out of the way of harm until he captured the fort. The tone of his letter led them to believe that there was no doubt of his success. Under these conditions it seems no one took either the trouble or the risk of Clark's displeasure to warn the garri- son. Clark immediately marshalled his little battalion and followed close upon his messenger. By the time the curious Creoles had gathered at the edge of the town to see if the report was really true, Clark was marching into the town. The attacking column formed in two divisions. One under Bo^\^nan marched direct to Fort Sackvilie and shut up the garrison. The other, under Clark himself, took pos- session of the town. The Frenchmen, referred to by Clark as prisoners, acted as guides and every movement was car- ried out with precision. Fort Sackvilie, it is thought, stood near the river bank between the present Vigo and Barnet Streets, facing St. Xavier Church, which stood in what is now Church Street. The fort was in a good state of defense except for a garri- son. The French militia, on whom Hamilton had largely depended, now deserted him. The first division of the Americans took up a position in front of the main gate of the fort, where, under cover of darkness, they hastily threw up a barricade. The other Americans took up their positions cautiously around the fort and a desultory fire was kept up on the blockhouses throughout the night. After daw^n the battle opened in good earnest. The accurate fire of the frontiersmen, many of whom were only fifty yards from the fort, prevented the British from manning their guns, and after six or eight men were hit they gave it up entirely. The French militia now joined the Americans boldly. The Piankeshaw chief also offered to aid Clark with 200 warriors but the offer was courteously declined, although Clark availed himself C(f the chief's counsel during the night. About nine o'clock 64 HISTORY OF INDIANA in the morning, February 24, Clark sent in a demand for surrender. While this flag of truce was passing, Clark's men ate breakfast, which was kindly furnished them by the women of Vincennes. Hamilton promptly refused the de- mand for an unconditional surrender. In the afternoon the courage of the British began to fail. The superior marksmanship of the back-woodsmen was telling on the garrison. Hamilton had only about sixty trusty British regulars, the rest being Detroit volunteers. Of the regulars, eight or ten were already killed or wound- ed. With his garrison half mutinous and an assault on the works imminent, Hamilton sent out a flag to ask for terms. A conference followed at the church. While this was being held, some Indians, who had been captured a few hours before, were led down the street to the river bank in front of the fort gate, tomahawked, and their bodies thrown into the river. The miserable wretches had been taken red-handed as they returned from a scalping raid to Kentucky. Their brutal butchery by Clark's men is not to be condoned, but the sight of it completely unnerved Ham- ilton, and terms of surrender were quickly arranged. Thus culminated one of the romantic exploits of the Revolution. Its results have been more far-reaching than those of any other achievement of that war save the achievement of In- dependence itself. Historians have not failed to point out the great ad- vantage which the capture of Vincennes gave to our peace commissioners at the Treaty of Paris, but they have ne- glected to emphasize its immediate eff'ect on the Revolu- tionary War itself by completely breaking up the British campaign for 1779. The city of Savannah had just been stormed and a British base of operations established there. Agents from this place had gone among the southern In- dians and raised them against the back settlements. Arms and other supplies of war, to the value of $100,000, had been sent to the Cherokees, who were making their war camp at Chickamauga. From the north, Hamilton had come do^vn from Detroit, had recaptured Vincennes and was spending the winter there repairing the fort. He re- THE CONQUEST BY VIRGINIA 65 garded Clark as a mere frontier raider, who, in the pres- ence of an organized force, would offer about as much re- sistance as Helm had at Vincennes. This was his fatal mistake. He had sent most of his soldiers among the tribes to prepare for the big council of all the western Indians, from the Chickasaws and the Cherokees on the south to the Menominees and Outagamies on the north, to be held in the spring at the mouth of the Tennessee. With a force of 1,000 Indians and British, provided with brass cannon to batter down the stockade forts in the valley, Hamilton intended to sweep up the Ohio, break up the settlements of Kentucky, capture Pittsburg and devastate the frontiers of Virginia and Pennsylvania. At the same time a British army would advance from the south. Thus, with Howe at Philadelphia, they would attack Pennsylvania and Virginia on all sides and end the war. Virginia never did herself more honor than when these dangers hovered on her bord- ers. While one of her sons drove Howe to the seacoast at New York, another. Col. Isaac Shelby, gathered up a small army and fell upon the Cherokee camp at Chickamauga, destroying all their stores, killing many warriors and de- moralizing the tribe; a third, as has been noted, captured the British general, Hamilton, at Vincennes. Not only did the winter campaigns of Clark and Shelby save the frontier from Indian depredations and allow the backwoodsmen to fight at King's Mountain and Cowpens, but it kept open the western way to New Orleans, whence many of the sup- plies for the Virginia troops came. Colonel Clark learned from his captives that a detach- ment of Hamilton's troops was already on its way to Vin- cennes with a large amount of stores for the Indian council at the mouth of the Tennessee and for the ensuing cam- paign. The next day after the surrender, February 26, he sent fifty men in three boats up the river to intercept this party before it should learn the fate of the garrison at Vincennes. The command was given to Captain Helm, but most of the men were Vincennes militia under their own officers, Francis Bosseron and J. M. P. Legras. They ad- vanced rapidly for about one hundred and twenty miles, 66 HISTORY OF INDIANA when the scouts announced the approach of the enemy. These latter were in seven boats commanded by Commis- sary Adhemar. They were surprised in camp at night and then taken without a struggle. There were forty of the British in seven boats and fifty of the Americans in three. The mails from Detroit, with dispatches to Hamilton, were all captured, showing that the surprise was complete. There was great rejoicing among the Creoles when the party re- turned. The captured stores were valued at $50,000. Clark was thinking seriously of continuing his march against Detroit; and, but for the prisoners with which he was encumbered, might have made the attempt. The pros- pect of success was encouraging. There were only eighty soldiers in the dilapidated fort at Detroit. The citizens prepared a public feast when they heard that Hamilton was captured, and they laid up stores against the time when Clark should make his appearance at their post. Clark thought it best, however, not to risk all in a desperate venture that was not absolutely necessary. On March 7 Hamilton and eighteen other British pris- oners were sent to Virginia and the rest of the captured men were either paroled or voluntarily took the oath of allegiance. Forty men, under Lieut. Richard Brashers, were left to garrison Fort Sackvilie, whose name they changed to Fort Patrick Henry; Captain Helm was made civil com- mandant of the town. With the rest of his troops. Colonel Clark embarked on his little fleet for Kaskaskia, March 20, 1779. It is extremely unfortunate that Clark was unable to capture Detroit at this time. The long, bloody Indian wars that followed, lasting twenty-five years, are inseparably connected with the British occupation of that post. The Miami Indians might have been saved had it not been for British interference. As it was, their minds were poisoned against the Americans so much that they fought until they were ruined.^ 3 The best source for the det;iils of Clark's CiUnpiiiiin is the Gvorfle Rogers Clark Papers, imblished. 1912, by the Illinois Stnte Historical Library ; James Alton James, president of Northwestern University, THE CONQUEST BY VIRGINIA 67 § 15 Civil Government Under Virginia An account of Clark's victory at Kaskaskia reached Virginia in October, 1778. On the recommendation of the governor all the lands northwest of the Ohio were organ- ized as the county of Illinois. John Todd, Jr., was chosen county lieutenant to establish the authority of Virginia in the new conquest. He reached Kaskaskia in May, 1779, soon after Clark returned from his campaign against Vin- cennes. His instructions required him to show every pos- sible respect to the French and cultivate the good vdll of the Indians. He had no authority either to make grants of land to settlers or purchase it from Indians. He was to give the people all the self-government compatible with military occupation and their exposed position. Soon after his arrival, perhaps in June, he ordered an election. The details of this early election would be inter- esting but we do not have them. In June, either by this election or by appointment, a civil and criminal court was constituted at Vincennes. Col. J. M. P. Legras and Maj. Francis Bosseron were the leading citizens at Vincennes. The former became commandant of the post, while the lat- ter, who vv^as the wealthiest of the inhabitants, ruled the council or court, as it was called. The chief activity of the commandant as vv^ell as the court was to make grants of land, especially to the new settlers, many of whom followed in Clark's wake. This power was not conferred on court or commandant, as has been stated, and its use soon led to trouble. Lieutenant Todd soon returned to Virginia on business of the new government, leaving the French to carry on their government to their own liking. There is no evidence that he was ever in Vincennes.^ editor. In this volume are all the papers relating to Clark's campaign. Good accounts are by William H. English, The Conquest of the Country Northicest of the River Ohio; by Theodore Roosevelt, The Wi7ini)ig of the West; Dunn, IncUamv; and numerous authors of lesser note. Butler, Histonj of Kentucky, and Marshall. History of Kentucky, both wrote while many of Clark's soldiers were living. Roosevelt used some tra- dition.al evidence in his account. 4 The Record Book and I'apers of John Todd are given in number thirty-five, Fergus IJistorical Series, edited by Edwin G. iNIason, 1S90. 68 HISTORY OF INDIANA Left without the support of the Virginians, the govern- ment at the French posts rapidly melted away into anar- chy. There was no power to regulate the Indian trade and the visits of the Indians were the occasions for drunken debauchery and robbery. The usual results followed. The outraged Indians meted out their vengeance to the exposed farmers. Murders were a daily occurrence. The orderly class of people in the villages undertook to drive the lawless traders away and in the struggle organized government dis- appeared. The trade with Canada was entirely ruined by Clark's success and that with New Orleans soon ceased be- cause the Indians resorted more and more to Detroit, where they were better treated by the British. The Virginians flooded the Illinois and Wabash settle- ments with paper money which soon depreciated and became worthless. "^ Several of the best friends of the conquerors were financially broken by accepting this in payment for their property. The priests strove to set a barrier to the flood of vice. The letters of Father Gibault to his bishop at Quebec give us a terrible picture for Vincennes. According to him the condition of the little village was much more vicious and lawless than the Miami towns higher up on the Wabash. The Virginia legislature soon realized its own in- ability to garrison and govern the distant settlements and turned the whole conquest over to the national government, which did not find itself able to furnish a stable administra- tion for the next ten years. During this time the soil of Indiana was devoted to violence and savage wars. Before leaving this chapter of western history the gen- erous recognition of the services of her soldiers by Virginia must be noted. A beautiful and costly sword, engraved appropriately, was voted the victorious Colonel Clark. Be- sides this and the formal thanks of the legislature, a tract of land was donated to the little army. The land was se- lected by Clark, and the other officers appointed for that purpose, on the north bank of the Ohio river just above the 5 See letter of J. M. P. Legras in the Todd Papers, Fergus His- torical Scries, No. 33, p. 198. The French farmers had sold all their produce to Clark for these worthless bills. THE CONQUEST BY VIRGINIA 69 Falls. This tract of 150,000 acres, lying in Clark, Scott and Floyd counties, is known as "Clark's Grant," or the "Illinois Grant." It was the first land surveyed in the State and, with the Vincennes tract, forms the only exception to the general survey in the State. It was divided into lots of 500 acres each. A town site of 1,000 acres was set aside by the State of Virginia and named Clarksville. Here the gal- lant general and many of his men made their home, and the cities they founded here at the Falls, Louisville, Clarks- ville, Jeffersonville, are their appropriate monuments.*^ c There is a vast amount of literature on the subject of Clark's con- quest, but by far the best is the monograph written by William Hayden English, Conquest of the Country Northwest of the River Ohio, 1S96. There is a good sympathetic account in The Witimng of the West, by Theodore Roosevelt. The documents are all given in the George Rogers Clark Papers, edited by James Alton James. 1912, which is the final authority on this period. (6) CHAPTER IV closing campaigns of the revolution, 1780-1783 § 16 Indians of Indiana A history of the Indian inhabitants of Indiana can scarcely be kept in geographical bounds, since the Indians were nomadic in their habits. All the tribes, which, at any time, had their homes on the soil of the State or hunted in its forests, belonged to the Algonquin stock; unless we ex- cept the Mingoes, who were a branch of the Iroquois and had homes for a time in Ohio. It is difficult to form an adequate notion of these primitive peoples. They left no records, and the untamed Indians seem to have been a puz- zle to the first whites who visited them. Usually morose, calm and cold, they would at times break out into expres- sions of tempestuous wrath or grief. Usually they were masters of their feelings, so that they could withstand the severest trials of cold and hunger without a murmur, or, tied to the post of torture, could sing their death-song like martyrs. But at times, such as the death of a chief, or the destruction of their village, they would moan and sob like children. Their thoughts were primarily of war and the chase. Their senses were keen but their reason rudimentary. They believed in sorcery and witchcraft. Spirits, friendly and unfriendly, animated everything around them. Powerful giants contended with the forest and dashed to the ground the stalwart oaks. The frost king came down from the north and blew his breath on the grass and trees and they died. He laid his icy hands on the lakes and rivers and forthwith they were still in death. The shaggy bear sought shelter in the hollow trees ; the deer and bison fled from the prairies beyond the reach of the Indian arrow. The pike CLOSING CAMPAIGN OF THE REVOLUTION 71 and trout, at the frost king's approach, withdrew to the deepest pools. The tribes then divided up into small parties who pitched their bark tents in the shelter of some protect- ing pines. They were fortunate if all escaped death by cold and hunger through the long winter. Spring brought its bounties of fish, berries and game. The sufferings of the winter were forgotten in the balmy sunshine. But the Indians learned little by experience. Their squaws prepared the fields and planted the corn, beans and pumpkins. In the harvest time they lived care- free, only to meet the coming winter as unprepared as be- fore. Nature was too much for their simple thought and the work of natural forces seemed to them the work of spirits. Their reverent, childlike minds were lost in the confusion. No Indians made homes in the hunting grounds of Ken- tucky. It was the border-land of the Cherokees, Miamis and Iroquois. The Miamis, who visited it oftenest, did not dare to take their squaws and papooses there for fear of the hostile Cherokees, whose homes were in the mountain valleys of Tennessee. Likewise they did not make the up- per Ohio Valley their home for fear of the predatory Iro- quois. But around the western end of Lake Erie, in the valley of the Maumee, on the Wabash and its branches, the Mississinewa, the Eel and the Tippecanoe, on the Elkhart, and the St. Joseph, was a numerous population. The strength of these combined tribes, the Wyandots, Mingoes, Delawares, Shawnees, Miamis, Munsees, Pottawattomies, Kickapoos, Weas, Piankeshaws, and the various bands of Lake Indians, that sometimes visited the northern bound- aries of Indiana, is variously estimated at from 5,000 to 25,000 warriors. Stretched in a chain of towns from Lake Erie to the lower Ohio they formed an impassable barrier to the further progress of western settlement. Under their system of confederation it was next to im- possible for any leader to weld the tribesmen into an army. There was no bond uniting the tribes, other than a feeling of kinship. Though open war never happened between whole tribes, such as was carried on between Iroquois and 72 HISTORY OF INDIANA Hurons in the earlier days, there were bickerings and petty quarrels, ending in murder and consequent reprisals, going on all the time. Inter-tribal quarrels were liable to blaze out at any time and break up a large Indian army. The constant encouragement of the English at Detroit also helped to hold the tribes more firmly together than was customary. Likewise the steady pressure of the white set- tlers threw the tribes back upon each other, making con- certed opposition to a mutual enemy easier. The soil of Kentucky, Ohio and Indiana was the last great battle- ground of the natives with the settlers. There the rem- nants of the broken tribes rallied around the native Miamis. They never retreated from this stronghold. When the wars were over, they were so completely conquered they never again united in a war against the whites. It will give a clearer idea of this Indian people to sketch briefly, in re- view, the history of each separate tribe.^ In the early days the Hurons, of whom the Wyandots are the descendants, occupied the basin of the Great Lakes and the St. Lawrence Valley down to Quebec. In an earlier paragraph the attempt of the French to civilize and reor- ganize this tribe has been noticed. The national enemies of the Hurons were the Iroquois. In a long v/ar, said by Huron tradition to have been carried on through seventy summers, the Iroquois drove the Hurons back on the Otta- was and Chippewas, whose combined strength turned the tide of battle ; so that the Iroquois in turn were saved only by the interposition of the French. The fact seems to be that the Hurons were so nearly destroyed that the wreck of the proud tribe sought refuge under the guns of Detroit. After the destruction of the Iroquois in 1778-9 the Wyandots established their tribal village on Sandusky river in northern Ohio. They had profited by their ancient rela- tions with the French and far surpassed their neighbors in 1 The best sources for the historj- of the northwestern Indians are, Ahorigincs of the Ohio Valley, by William Henry Harrison ; The Jesuit Relations; Thwnites, Early Western Travels; The Indian Tribes of the United States, Henry R. Schoolcraft ; and The French in Arneriea, Fran- cis Parkman. There is a vast literature on the subject, most of which is partisan. For illustrations of Indian life see Catlin. CLOSING CAMPAIGN OF THE REVOLUTION 73 civilization. They lived in well-constructed log dwellings and carried on considerable agriculture. They numbered at this time near 450 warriors. From this new home they joined with other Indians in the long border warfare car- ried on during and after the Revolution. They joined in the various treaties that mark the stages of that struggle, and, when finally forced to cede their last lands to the United States they passed with their kindred tribes to the valley of the Kansas. The Wyandots had the reputation of being the bravest as well as the most humane warriors on the frontier. They rarely punished their captives ; but, on the contrary, at once adopted most of them into their families. So many captives were adopted that the character of the tribe was materially changed. Many traditions lingered with the warriors and chieftains of this nation. One tradition is that in the old days of the tribe's glory, a famous chief, wishing to know how many warriors he had, commanded that each, as they filed past him, should drop into a wooden bowl, which the chief held, a single grain of corn. Although the bowl held over half a bushel, the grains had filled it before all the warriors were past. Like the Wyandots, the Mingo Indians were a tribal remnant. They were the descendants of the haughty Iro- quois. In their days of power they had fought their ene- mies victoriously on the shores of the Gulf of St. Lawrence, in the valley of the Connecticut, on the banks of the Missis- sippi, along the rocky coasts of Lake Superior and among the pine barrens of the Carolinas. In all those wide reaches no Indians lived that did not acknowledge the power of these warriors. But at the close of the Revolution the broken tribes were refugees in the land of their ancestral enemies. The Mingo Villages were in northern Ohio and few, if any, ever made their homes in what is now Indiana, though in war and chase they joined with the Miamis and ranged our forests and streams. Like the latter nations, the Delawares also were a fugi- tive people. Their fathers sleep on the beautiful Susque- hanna, around the Chesapeake, and on the numerous rivers 74 HISTORY OF INDIANA and bays of Virginia. They were Delawares who captured John Smith; and so were those who treated with Wilham Penn. Powhatan and Pocahontas were of their royal blood. Before the terrible Iroquois and the encroachment of the white settlers they had been forced gradually westward. Count Zinzendorf, Heckewelder and David Zeisler, the Moravian missionaries, had worked among them. The homeless tribes settled on the Muskingum and Beaver creek in Ohio about 1760. There they established their "Gnadenhiitten" or Tents of Peace. They were a dirty, squalid people about their villages. Lazy warriors basked in the sun or smoked in indolence while their squaws tended the small gardens or did other work. Their numer- ous towns were scattered far up this valley. They could muster near 600 warriors. They mingled on terms of equal- ity and friendship with the Shawnees and took an honor- able part in every contest for their new homes from Brad- dock's Defeat to the Battle of the Thames. After the War of 1812 they were transported beyond the Missouri. Some of the tribesmen passed thence into Texas, where they served as guides or hunters along the Santa Fe Trail, vary- ing the occupation occasionally by robbing Mexicans, in which they exhibited their old time skill, for they were re- puted to be the best horsethieves along the border. The Shawnee Indians have a beautiful tradition of the Creation. It runs thus: The Master of life, himself an Indian, made the Shawnee before any other human beings. He gave to the Indians all the knowledge he himself pos- sessed. From, the various parts of the first Shawnee the Master made the French, English, Dutch and Americans. The inferior nations were made white, as a sign of their v»Aeakness. But later, the all-powerful Shawnees, be- coming corrupt, knowledge was taken from them and given to the despised whites. Of all the savages who warred on the western settlers, the most dreaded and despised were the treacherous, cruel, sneaking Shawnees. Their very name was a terror through- out the border. They are said to have come originally from the south, driven thence by the allied tribes on account of CLOSING CAMPAIGN OF THE REVOLUTION 75 76 HISTORY OF INDIANA their cruelty. They settled on the Scioto and on Paint creek in Ohio. Large towns were found also at Piqua and on Mad river. Later they settled on the Great Miami. The Chillicothe Towns were also Shawnee. All told there were no less than sixteen villages. Under their most famous chiefs, Tecumseh and the Prophet, they migrated to In- diana. From the beginning of the French and Indian War in 1755 down to the end of the War of 1812, ill-tempered Shawnee warriors were continually harassing the Ameri- can frontiers. Rarely taking a leading part, it vv^as they who usually broke the peace by committing some murder- ous foray. They were near the Ohio and it is to them that nearly all the long list of casualties on that river are to be charged. In the beginning of these wars they were a numerous tribe. The Piqua Tov/ns alone are said to have numbered 4,000 souls. The last years of the struggle wasted them rapidly, so that when they were transported to their western home only about 1,800 of the large tribe remained. So far as is known the Piankeshaws had always lived on the Lower Wabash. They had always been on friendly terms with the French and when the latter welcomed the Virginian, the Piankeshaws did likewise. Their friend- ship for the Americans was most fortunate; for, had the two hundred warriors of Tobacco's Son been hostile, the conquest of Vincennes could not have been made by Colonel Clark. They were a branch of the Miami Confederacy. Their towns extended as far up as the Terre Haute and the Vermillion stream. They quickly melted away before the vices of the more highly civilized whites. Harrison later described them as a most woebegone people, who, after bartering their clothes for whiskey, would then spend their time in drunken debauchery as long as the whiskey lasted. Count Volney says the swine rolled the drunken wretches around in the gutter with their snouts. Strongest of all the northwestern Indians were the Mia- mis. The nation or confederacy was made up of at least four tribes. The Twightwees lived in the valley around the junction of the rivers St. Mary and St. Joseph. Their prin- CLOSING CAMPAIGN OF THE REVOLUTION 77 cipal village, Kekionga, was on the site of Fort Wayne. Another large village, over on Eel river, was called the Eel River Miamis. Other villages were on the Mississinewa and on the headwaters of White river. Down the Wabash farther was the Wea town, Ouiatanon, claimed by the Weas as the ancient home of their fore- fathers. Their squaws and children cultivated wide fields on the Wea Plains below Lafayette. The Shockeys, who dwelt on the Vermillion river and the prairie west of the Wabash, were also reported pure Miamis. Besides these, there were the Pottawattomies, whose principal villages were on the Tippecanoe and the many beautiful lakes tribu- tary to it, and on the Kankakee river and the St. Joseph of Lake Michigan. This was a warlike tribe when aroused, but not so irritable as the Shawnees or Delawares. The Kickapoos were an allied, if not a kindred, tribe living on the prairies northwest of Lafayette. Bands of Chippewas and Ottav/as frequently dwelt on the Yellow and Kankakee rivers in friendly relation with the Miamis. All these tribes, together with fugitive bands of Shaw- nees, Delawares and other eastern Indians falling back before the white settlers, made an Indian population on the Wabash of at least 5,000 warriors. Under their great chief, Little Turtle, they fought with a desperate courage un- equaled in Indian warfare. Their traditions taught them that the Wabash was their sacred river. Little Turtle, at the treaty of Greenville, said it was well known that his forefather kindled the first fires at Detroit; from thence he ran his line to the Scioto, to its mouth, and thence down the Ohio to the Wabash ; from the mouth of the Wabash to Chicago on Lake Michigan. They have no tradition of a migration. The earliest French ex- plorers found them on the Wabash and there the spirit of the tribe remains. A few hundreds of their children were carried away beyond the Mississippi, but, more nearly than any others, they mingled with the whites and their blood and spirit still animate many inhabitants of Indiana. More humane treatment would have subdued their haughty pride and converted the whole tribe into valuable citizens ; but at 78 HISTORY OF INDIANA the close of the eighteenth century they were a savage folk who massacred women and children, drank the blood of their victims, and made merry as they burned their captives at the stake. More white men have been tortured at old Kekionga than at any other place in the state. § 17 Last Stage of the Revolutionary War in the West After the capture of Colonel Hamilton the British changed their plans in the west. Previous to that event it had been the custom for England to conduct the war with comparatively strong bodies of regular troops, aided by such bands of Indians as could be had. The Indians were armed and provisioned by the British but the war was waged by British troops commanded by British officers. After the fall of Vincennes a Tory Knickerbocker named Arent DePeyster, took command at Detroit. As with Ham- ilton and Rocheblave, the policy of this brutal partisan was to rouse the Indians to war, supply them with arms and provisions and place them in charge of white officers. This defensive policy had for its object the terrorization of the frontier. The British general hoped thus to prevent the Americans from making any effort at capturing Detroit. The Indians were led to believe that they could drive the settlers from Kentucky. Colonel Clark never regarded his work of conquest as finished. Detroit was his objective, and he had been keen enough from the first to recognize that fort as the source of all the western depredations. Jefferson, who succeeded Patrick Henry as governor of Virginia, was in accord with Clark's plan and did what he could to aid him. But the Indians north of the Ohio were becoming more hostile, and all the men on the border were needed to repel their fre- quent incursions. The traitor Arnold having invaded Vir- ginia in 1781, that State could hardly spare a man, nor was it afterward free of hostile armies till the war was ended. Historians have blamed the Virginia government for not supporting Clark ; but such censure is nonsense. He would, CLOSING CAMPAIGN OF THE REVOLUTION 79 indeed, be a far-sighted governor who would send his army fifteen hundred miles through the forest on a foreign con- quest when his own capital was in the possession of the enemy and hostile armies devastating the homes of his people. Clark did, later, recruit some reinforcements in Penn- sylvania and was enabled to garrison Kaskaskia, Cahokia, and Vincennes. The Indians around these forts were com- pletely overawed. No American was more feared by the Indians than Clark. A small band of Delawares who had established themselves in the thickets near the mouth of White river continued to annoy the white settlers after they had made peace. Clark sent his rangers against them with instructions to destroy them. In vain the hapless Delawares sued for peace. The rangers tracked them down, sparing only the women and children. The other nearby tribes were treated so fearlessly and justly by Clark that they never afterward opposed him. It was decided to make the Falls the base of military operations in the west, and thither Clark repaired in the autumn of 1779. He was made a brigadier general and placed in command of all the western militia. His position here gave a sense of security to the frontier, and thousands of settlers poured into Ken- tucky, many even continuing on to the Wabash and Illinois Countries. While Clark was busy on the lower Ohio the British were directing war parties against eastern Kentucky and western Virginia. In order to check these John Bowman, the county lieutenant of Kentucky, collected 160 Kentuck- ians in May, 1779, and surprised the Indians in the Chilli- cothe Towns. The Indian town was burned but the Indians, regaining their courage, rallied in and around a block- house that had been defended against the fire and drove the Kentuckians away. The discomfited whites retreated slowly. The Indians had the best of the attack but the loss of their town and the show of such force was a great shock to them. The Kentuckians had eight or ten men killed and two wounded and the Indians lost an equal num- ber. The Kentuckians were much chagrined over their de- 80 HISTORY OF INDIANA feat, but, judged by its results, it was most fortunate. The partisan captain, Henry Bird, was at one of the Mingo towns nearby, where he had succeeded in raising and arm- ing a formidable war party to attack the settlement. When news of the assault of Bowman reached them, his Indians fled in a panic and the expedition broke up. But Bird was not to be baffled. On June 22, 1780, there appeared before Ruddle's Sta- tion a small stockade on the south fork of Licking, in the center almost of the wilderness of Kentucky, an army of Canadians and Indians numbering over 700 Indians and near 200 rangers, flying the English flag and supported by artillery. Such a sight had not' been seen in Kentucky and w^e can hardly blame the little station for surrendering at discretion. This army had been raised by DePeyster and was in command of Captain Bird. Henry Bird was then a captain in the Eighth or King's Regiment of regulars. With him on this expedition went the three Girty Brothers, loyalists of Pittsburg, and Cap- tain McKee, the royal Indian agent. DePeyster had sent a strong body of Indians down the Wabash to talce Vincennes and join Bird in an attack on Clark at the Falls. Bird had been ordered to attack Clark, but when he reached the Ohio river his Indian chiefs forced him to attack the smaller stations. They had a wholesome dread of Clark. It was said that this was a part of the magnificent army of 1,500 Indians summoned to co-operate with Plamilton the year before. Detroit had been a beehive of industry during the preceding ^vinter. The commander at Quebec complained of the enormous amount of supplies and espe- cially of the whiskey consumed. Forgetful of his inten- tion, the tory commander having taken the little posts. Ruddles and Martins, on the Licking, fled precipitately to Canada, abandoning his guns at the Indian towns in Ohio and killing most of his prisoners, of whom he took nearly 300. In the early months of 1780 General Clark was down at the mouth of the Ohio, where he established Fort Jeffer- son to protect the commerce with the Spanish on the Missis- CLOSING CAMPAIGN OF THE REVOLUTION 81 sippi, and also to strengthen his claim to the whole east bank of that river. In May, with all the troops he could spare, he had returned through the forest to the settlements at Harrodsburg, Kentucky. The overwhelming force of the Indian attack had spread consternation among the settlers and many were tempted to return east of the mountains. Clark sent a guard to the Crab Orchard to intercept all those who attempted to leave by the Wilderness Road. Then closing the land office at Harrodsburg he drafted an army to go against the Indians. These men v/ere to meet at the mouth of the Licking, opposite Cincinnati. Capt. Benjamin Logan was second in command and looked after the men drafted, while Clark proceeded to Louisville and led his men from that garrison. The latter went up the river in light boats, while the horse- men rode as near the bank as possible. The settlers turned out almost to a man, the riflemen floating down the Licking on rafts or in canoes. There was little in the way of pro- visions, every man carrying his own supply. On August 2 Clark ferried his men across the Ohio and plunged into the wilderness of Ohio. Old Chillicothe lay full sixty miles to the north, and thither he led his men with accustomed swiftness and silence. At night, to avoid surprise, the troops camped in a large square. Chillicothe was deserted when the army reached it. After burning it they hastened on to Piqua, on Mad river, which they reached at ten on the morning of August 8. Piqua, or Pickaway, was built of log huts in the French fashion. They stood apart from each other facing the stream and separated by strips of corniand. In the center stood a considerable block-house, loop-holed for muskets. Clark divided his army, sending half, under Logan, around to cross the stream and gain the rear of the villages and cut off retreat, while he himself led half the troops directly across and drove the Indians from the town. Logan failed to cross the river and the In- dians escaped, the 200 warriors, with their families, fleeing for safety. As soon as the latter had reached the cover of the woods, the warriors turned and faced the whites, grad- ually yielding, however, to superior numbers. For two 82 HISTORY OF INDIANA hours this skirmish was kept up, when the Kentuckians returned toward the town, halting half an hour, when nearly there, for Logan to come up. As they returned Captain McAfee was killed by an Indian secreted in a tree top. This Indian was immediately shot, but it was soon found that a large body of warriors had slipped back and taken possession of the blockhouse. In the fighting here each side suffered. The Indians were finally dislodged and retreated under shelter of the river bank, barely escaping Logan, who had finally crossed the river and marched down. Clark lost seventeen men and the Indians about the same number. After all the Indian property was destroyed. Captain Logan was sent to attack a neighboring village, twenty miles away, which he destroyed, together with a store be- longing to British and French traders. The army then hastened home, having spent only twenty-five days on the campaign.2 It was generally believed throughout the west that the French at Detroit were as friendly toward the Americans as those of the Illinois Country had been. The Americans felt that if a sufficient force could be quickly and quietly marched through the Indian country without rousing them the fort could be taken. There was at this time a French- man in the Illinois Country named LaBalme. He had come to America in 1776 and had served as inspector general of cavalry in the Continental Army. He was chosen for the attempt on Detroit because it was thought he would have great influence with his countrymen at Detroit and in Illi- nois. Ambitious to duplicate the achievements of Clark, he raised a company of seventy or eighty Creoles in Illinois and on the Wabash in the fall of 1780 and hastened up the Wabash. The Indians, cowed by punishment so recently inflicted by Clark, no doubt would not have interfered with 2 The doeuuieutary iiistory of these Indian campaigns is in the George Rogers Clark Papers. This should be supplemented by Jeffer- son's letters, given in his works, by TIenn/s Life of Henry; and by But- terfield's History of the Girtys. The Haldiraand Papers contain the documents on the British side. Butler's History of Kcntiickg is the best of the old books on this period. CLOSING CAMPAIGN OF THE REVOLUTION 83 LaBalme's march had he proceeded directly to his work. But his control over the Creoles, many of whom were traders and bush rangers, was slight and the stores of the British traders at the site of Fort Wayne tempted his men to plunder. While engaged in plundering, a large force of Indians under Little Turtle fell upon the camp of the in- vaders by night, in early November, and killed about half the party, including the captain, and scattered the rest to the woods. Had LaBalme marched directly, without mo- lesting the traders on whom the Indians depended for sup- plies, his chances were favorable for success.^ Early in the war Virginians had opened up commercial connections with the Spanish at New Orleans. Communi- cations had been kept open and nearly all the ammunition used in the western campaign had come from Spanish mer- chants. An agent of Virginia stationed at New Orleans furnished Clark with money for his Illinois garrisons. When Clark was in Illinois he had also exchanged civilities with the Spanish commanders at St. Louis and St. Gene- vieve. But he soon came to distrust them, believing that they would be pleased to see the British regain the Illi- nois so that they might in turn drive the British out and thus hold the whole western country for Spain at the close of the war, which all saw was fast approaching. With this design of the Spaniards the French seemed in full sym- pathy. It was their hope to limit the Americans to the country east of the crest of the mountains. If not held for the Spanish Crown the Northwest at least would serve as a makeweight in the treaty for the cession of Gibraltar. A Spanish general named Bernardi de Galvez, with a force of Creoles, both French and Spaniards, captured the posts on the middle river — Baton Rouge and Natchez — and then marched on Mobile and Pensacola. The commander of St. Louis joined in the work early in 1781. On January 2 Don Pierro, the commandant, led a party of 100 nonde- script Spaniards, Indians and French Creoles from St. Louis against the post of St. Joseph on the St. Joseph river of Lake Michigan. He met with no opposition but was afraid 3 John Todd Papers, Fergus Historical Series, No. 33, 207, note. 84 HISTORY OF INDIANA to garrison the post after he had robbed the British fur- traders and burned their huts. Like the plunderer he was, he retreated faster than he had advanced. Insignificant as the raid was, Spain laid claim to the whole territory north- west of the Ohio on the strength of it. Since the capture of Vincennes, Clark had kept in mind his intention to take Detroit. At a council of war, held at the Falls in 1779, he had discussed it with his fellow offi- cers, but the establishment of Fort Jefferson, the invasion by Bird, and the expedition against the Piqua Town, had occupied him for over a year. He hastened to Virginia, as soon as he could leave Kentucky, to perfect his arrange- ments and raise troops. He found Virginia in great dis- tress over the invasion of Arnold, and at once joined the army to drive out the traitor. Jefferson had already expressed his approval of the plan to capture Detroit and had enlisted the co-operation of Washington, who directed Col. Daniel Brodhead, com- manding at Fort Pitt, to furnish Clark with supplies and a battalion of regular troops. Everything seemed in a good way till he began to recruit soldiers. It was then learned that everybody was worn out with the long war. From Frederick, Berkeley and Hampshire counties the lieuten- ants reported troops unable to move on account of lack of supplies. In some cases there was open mutiny. Colonel Brodhead refused the detachment of regulars. Clark had hoped to leave Pittsburg by June 15, but he had to depart much later with only 400 men. By August 4 he was at Wheeling, having given up all hope of a campaign against Detroit, though he still had hopes of punishing the Indians. In connection with this attempt on Detroit there oc- curred the greatest disaster sustained in the West during the war. Col. Archibald Lochry raised 107 men in West- moreland county, Pennsylvania, and started with them to join Clark. They reached Wheeling August 8. Clark had waited for them five days, but his men growing restless and deserting, he had gone on leaving Lochry and his band to follow. Twenty or thirty miles below, Clark waited again, and again had to go and leave them behind. His CLOSING CAMPAIGN OF THE REVOLUTION 85 troops were deserting so fast he did not dare wait any longer. Lochry followed, but, despairing of overtaking Clark with his whole force, he sent Lieutenant Shannon with seven men ahead to let Clark know he was coming. These seven men were taken by the Indians and with them the letter of Lochry to Clark, detailing the condition and number of aU. Clark's forces, including those under Lochry. There was great excitement, not only at Detroit but among the savages of Ohio, when it was learned Clark was gathering an army. DePeyster hastily gathered to- gether the frightened Indians and sent them, together with one hundred of Butler's rangers under partisan command- ers, to ward off the intended blow against Detroit. It was a part of this Indian army led by the Iroquois, Joseph Brant, and the Pittsburg refugee. George Girty, that cap- tured Lieutenant Shannon and immediately laid an ambus- cade for Lochry's company. A spot was selected about eleven miles below the mouth of the big Miami where Lochry creek joins the Ohio. There the Ohio was very narrow. A bar at low water ran almost across the river. Unfortunately the Americans decided to land on this bar for some purpose or other, thus walking directly into the ambuscade. The whole party was killed or captured. Some of the prisoners were killed, Colonel Lochry being of this number, and the rest were taken to Detroit, whence sixty finally reached home. The Indians, joined by the other tribes and led by the British Indian agent, Alexander Mc- Kee, followed on down to within thirty miles of the Falls, but, although they numbered near 1,000 men, they made no attack. As soon as they learned that Clark had aban- doned all hope of an offensive campaign they separated, a large band of Wyandottes and Miamis under McKee and Brant going into Kentucky on a marauding expedition.^ 4 For a popular aiifl fairly accurate account of the principal events of this period, in the history of the West, see .Tames R. Albach Annals of the West. Mann Butler. History of Kentucky is valuable, being written from first hand evidence. A detailed account of I.ochry's Defeat, by Charles Martindale. is published in A^ol. II. PuNications Indiana Historical Soricty; D. V. Culley, in Lawrenccburg Palladium, Mtxy 15, (7) 86 HISTORY OF INDIANA The year 1782 saw the last of the Revolutionary struggle between the English and Americans in the north- west, saw the most bloodshed of any year on the frontier, and saw the deepest gloom settle down over Kentucky. The agents of the British roused the Indians to frenzy by telling them that the Americans were preparing to drive them into Canada. The actions of the American troops on the border seemed to the Indians to confirm this. The year had scarcely begun when Col. David Williamson, with a company of Pennsylvania militia, on the track of a ma- rauding band of Wyandottes and Moravians, came to the Moravian towns on the Tuscarawas river, and, finding some of the bloodstained clothing of their murdered friends on the backs of these so-called peaceful Indians, they massacred every Indian they could get their hands on. The militia have been severely condemned for this bloody deed, but they did only what most men would have done under the circumstances. Hardly had this unfortunate blow blotted out the Mo- ravian tribe when, on June 4, Col. William Crawford ap- peared among the Upper Sandusky Towns. The fact that Crawford was killed and his regiment driven back did not quiet the natives. Their scouts brought reports that Gen. William Irvine at Fort Pitt was collecting a powerful army of regulars to invade the Miami country. The Indians gathered in great numbers at the Shawnee town of Wapa- tomica in central Ohio. Here also at their own urgent request they were joined by Capt. William Caldwell of the British rangers. After the usual round of inflammatory speeches they decided to march on Wheeling under the lead of Captain Caldwell. Hardly had Caldwell started when a report reached Detroit that Clark was preparing for a campaign. Such was the fear of both British and Indians for that leader that the expedition against Wheeling was recalled and the Indian agents of Detroit were sent in haste in all directions to call in the warriors. Shawnees, 1830, tells the story as he had it from Patrick Hunter, one of the cap- tives, living in 1830 near Corydon : see also Life of JosepJi linnii. and Butterfield. History of the Girtys. CLOSING CAMPAIGN OF THE REVOLUTION 87 Delawares, Wyandottes, Mingoes, Munceys, Ottawas, Chip- pewas and Miamis hastened to the rendezvous at the Piqua Plains. Had the hero of the Illinois led his Kentuckians into the Scioto country then he would have found the In- dians at home to receive him. Alexander McKee, the In- dian agent, said it was the largest force of Indians that had been collected in the Northwest up to that time. Only imminent danger could keep an Indian army together and when scouts from the Falls reported that the alarm was false this army melted away in a day. Of the 1,400 assembled, Captain Caldwell was able to persuade only 300 to go with him on a raid into Kentucky. It was this band that laid siege to Bryan's Station and a few days later, August 19, administered the disastrous repulse to the Ken- tucky militia at Blue Licks. Attacks were made about the same time on Rice's Fort, Fort Henry, and Wheeling, but the Indians had no skill in capturing fortified posts."- During the latter part of August Colonel De Peyster at Detroit was warned that peace was at hand and to stop hostilities. Scouts were dispatched to the rangers acting with the Indians. Had these been a few days earlier the loss at Blue Licks would have been avoided. As it was the Indians had roused their dreaded enemy at the Falls and now were left leaderless to bear his vengeance. The call of Clark had awakened the settlers to their old-time courage, and under the inspiration of his fame 1,050 set- tlers assembled at the mouth of the Licking opposite Cin- cinnati to punish the invaders. He crossed the Ohio No- vember 4, and in six days was among the Miami towns. The Indians had barely time to scatter to the woods, warned only by the alarm cry. A score of tribesmen were killed or captured and all their towns burned. Thinking themselves secure, the Indians had gathered here their win- ter's supply of corn and beans, all of which were lost. The blow was especially severe to the women and children. 5 For this period there is uo better history than Consul W. Butter- fielfl's History of the Girtys. See also Roosevelt. Winning the West ; McClung, Sketches of Western Adi>enture. The best sources are the Haldimand Papers, Pennsylvania Archives; Heckewilder's Narrative. 88 HISTORY OF INDIANA One can only pity them in their privations as they faced the winter without food or shelter in the inhospitable wil- derness. Nor should he at the same time forget the women and children left defenseless by the dastardly crimes of the warriors on the frontier. Without appearing to con- done the deeds of the Indians, whose very savagery is a sort of excuse for their unspeakable atrocity, the reader is reminded at every turn of this border warfare that the British were more guilty than the Indians. British cap- tains in scarlet uniform led the savage warriors in battle or stood by and saw them commit on their white prisoners cruelties not paralleled in history during the Christian era. The capture of Cornwallis, it was evident to all, would end the war between England and her former colonies and insure American independence. As noted above, the Brit- ish commanders soon after this event called in their forces. Provisional articles of peace were arranged on the last day of November, 1782, and the declaration was read at the head of the armies on the anniversary of the Battle of Lexington. The treaty was finally signed September 3, 1783. The boundary was laid down through the middle of Lake Erie, through Detroit river. Lake Superior, Long Lake, Lake of the Woods, thence due west to the Missisippi river and down the middle of that stream to the thirty-first degree of latitude. Thanks to the peace commissioners the work of the Virginia pioneers had not been in vain. They had added to the United States a territory nearly as large as the original colonies. Much has been said concerning what might have happened but for Clark's conquest. The terri- tory north of the Ohio at the beginning of the war was a part of Canada by the Quebec Act, and, had British armies held it to the close of the war, it would no doubt have remained a part of that province. It was not a de- fense by the Virginians of their own territory but was essentially a foreign conquest. Since 1783 England has yielded very little territory to any power, and it is all but certain she would never have ceded this to the United States. CLOSING CAMPAIGN OF THE REVOLUTION 89 She did not give up a single fort on account of the treaty and continued to hold Oswego, Niagara, Presque Isle, Sandusky, Detroit, Michillimacinac and Prairie du Chien, in the ceded territory, plague spots to the western settlements. Had England delivered up these posts, the two nations would have been spared the expense and hu- miliation of a second war twenty-nine years later. § 18 The Indians Become the Wards of the United States With the signing of the treaty, September 3, 1783, there devolved on the national government the care of the Indians living on the national domain. Up to this time the Indian problem had been one purely of frontier defense. But an enlightened nation could not wantonly destroy these simple folks. By the laws of warfare they had for- feited all rights to their land and almost to their lives; yet Congress had no idea of punishing them. It was nec- essaiy to adopt an Indian policy and organize a depart- ment of goverment to carry it out. Two of the leading principles incorporated in the Indian policy were the recog- nition of the tribal governments, and the recognition of the Indian ownership of the land.*^ After the long struggle of the pioneers was ended, as they thought, in 1783, the government recognized the Indian title as complete to all the Northwest territory. Not a settler could legally go into all that region. The men who went to treat with the tribes were given the same official title as those who went to treat with other foreign nations. Though ownership of the land was recognized in the tribes, they were not allowed to sell it to any other nation, nor were they allowed to sell it even to American settlers. If the Indians so de- sired, and the government lost no opportunity in creating such a desire, they might sell to the United States. It is 6 This principle is stater! clearly in S Wheatoii\^latcs Cciikus Rciiort, 1810. for this dat.i. CHAPTER VIII indiana and the war of 1812 § 34 After the Treaty of Greenville The Indians who gathered with General Wayne at Greenville were a thoroughly beaten, humiliated band, de- feated in the field by their enemies, the Americans, and de- ceived by their supposed friends, the English. The genera- tion of Little Turtle had had enough of war, and were ready to bury the hatchet for good. For fifteen years thereafter they lived quietly in their rude homes, at peace among themselves and with the white man. By 1811 a generation had grown up that had forgotten the miseries of the long war and that knew only of the steady encroach- ments of the whites. The chief causes of the growing dissatisfaction of the Indians were the steady progress of white settlements into their hunting grounds, the enormous amount of whiskey furnished them at high prices — Harrison estimated that 6,000 gallons were distributed annually to the 600 warriors on the Wabash — and the continual meddling of the Eng- lish. The fur trade was almost ruined by Napoleon's Con- tinental Policy. All these factors combining, kept the In- dians irritable, while the English emissaries fanned the growing anger until it burst into blaze. ^ In this crisis of Indian affairs the power of the peace- ful Little Turtle gradually declined. His place of influ- ence was taken by the war chief, Tecumseh. Tecumseh 1 In the. Amerivan l^tate Papers. V, TOO. 801-804; III, 453, 462; II, 402. fire printed, enousrb letters to show the sinister influence of the English ; see also Dawson's Life of Harrison; Drake's Life of Tecumseh; .T.-imes Hall, Sketches of liixtory. Life and Manners in the V,'e.^t. II. ch. ix. (13) 182 HISTORY OF INDIANA had taken an honorable part in the war against Wayne. He was known among the tribes as a fearless, upright, generous man, an opposer of the white man, especially of the white man's vices. It was his ambition to unite all the northwestern tribes into a grand confederacy, and drive the settlers across the Ohio river. It was the same fatal ambition which had misled Philip, and Pontiac, and later was to mislead Black Hawk. Tecumseh and his brother, the Prophet, were born on Mad river, near Springfield, Ohio. Their mother was a Creek, their father a Shawnee, perhaps a war chief. Te- cumseh had long been a war chief; he learned from Little Turtle the patience, the cunning, and the strategy neces- sary to win in the game of war. The Prophet is said to have been a drunkard in his early life; but l^er he quit drinking whiskey and became a prophet, a spiritual leader of the tribesmen. He preached against drunkenness, witches, and the civilization borrowed from the white man. Both pleaded with their people to return to the customs of their ancestors, and renounce the vices of civilization. The Shawnees had some years before migrated west- ward from their home in Ohio and, mingling with the Dela- wares, had settled on the headwaters of White river where Anderson now stands. From there the fame of the Prophet spread over the entire northwest. Hundreds of Indians left their homes on the Great Lakes and came on pilgrim- ages to see this saviour of the people, this oracle. His visions and his sermons held the redmen spellbound, and, in form and substance his teachings compare favorably with those of other men who have won large portions of mankind for their followers. Even President Jefferson was interested in the teachings of the Prophet. Tecumseh took full advantage of the popularity of his brother. He talked with the visiting tribesmen, v/inning many of their chiefs to his own views. He taught that the Indians all belonged to one family, and should have one common government. Especially did he insist on their common ownership of the land, the common hunting grounds. No tribe, nor men, he persuaded his followers, INDIANA AND THE WAR OF 1812 183 had a legal right to sell an acre of their hunting ground to the white men. It had been left to them by their an- cestors as a common inheritance. The chiefs had no right to barter it away for a pewter ringlet or a keg of liquor. September 30, 1809, the chiefs concluded a treaty with Harrison at Fort Wajme, by which they deeded 3,000,000 acres of land, a tract almost seventy miles square, for the petty trifle of $10,000 — one-third of a cent per acre. The Shawnees and the Wyandots, both refugee tribes, having no claims to the ceded lands, joined in a bitter protest, threatening to kill the chiefs who signed the treaty, and to murder the first white men who came on the purchased land. Meanwhile the Prophet, or as he was sometimes called, the Oracle, was carrying things with a high hand at his village of Andersontown. Some of the leading men of the tribe, including the old chief, were put to death for witch- craft. Fearing an outbreak if this Indian Mecca was not de- stroyed. Governor Harrison notified the Shawnees to stop the agitation. He denounced the Prophet as a fool, as an agent working for the British at Maiden, and demanded that the northern Indians be sent back to their homes. The Shawnees followed the advice of the governor and drove out the Prophet and his followers. The latter went west and settled on the Wabash near the mouth of the Tippecanoe. The governor's letter had shown Tecumseh that his own hold on the Indians was not yet very firm. He, accordingly, became more cautious, but continued his work of organization by visiting the different tribes, and cementing his alliances as best he could. The Prophet, on the contrary, continued his work more boldly than before in the new village. In August, 1808, he visited Harrison at Vincennes, and succeeded in smoothing over all their difficulties, the two parting with friendly assurances. The village on the Wabash, then known as the Prophets- town, soon became a worse nuisance than Andersontown had been. The connection with the British became more apparent and was finally acknowledged by the Prophet on 184 HISTORY OF INDIANA one of his visits to Vincennes. It was while these negotia- tions were going on that the land cession at Fort Wayne was completed, September 30, 1809. This cession amount- ed to a declaration of war betv/een Tecumseh and Harrison. The warlike Wyandots were backing the Shawnee chiefs in the contest. Unmistakable signs of war appeared on the Upper Wabash. Messenger after messenger, Joseph Barron, Michael Brouillette, Touissant Dubois, Francis Vigo, Pierre La Plante, John Connor, William Prince, was dispatched to the tribes. All reported the same restless- ness and signs of war among the redmen. Warriors were breaking away from their chiefs, leaving their tribes, and joining Tecumseh and the Prophet. - During the summer of 1810, Governor Harrison deter- mined to summon Tecumseh to Vincennes for a conference. Joseph Barron was sent with an invitation to the Shaw- nee brothers to visit Vincennes and lay their grievances before the governor. The Prophet received the messenger coldly, denounced him in council as a traitor and a spy. Tecumseh, more politic than his brother, rescued Barron from his dangerous position and, after listening respect- fully to his message, promised to come to Vincennes im- mediately. The villagers of Vincennes were surprised August 12, 1810, by the appearance among them of Tecumseh with 400 armed warriors. The Indians showed no signs of hos- tility as they went quietly into camp in the grove at the north end of the village, near the Harrison home. The people who had flocked to the governor's home to hear the eloquent Indian orator, were in a panic until the dignified conduct of Tecumseh assured them of safety. Tecumseh refused to come into the house to hold council, and the meeting was therefore held under the trees in front of the governor's mansion. In fearless, straightforward language Tecumseh set forth his plan of an Indian confederacy, his belief in the 2 lu addition to references cited above see Jacob Piatt Dunn, True Indian Stories; James R. Albacb, Wcntern Annals; Charles E. Slocum, The Ohio Country. INDIANA AND THE WAR OF 1812 185 common ownership of the hunting grounds, and his de- termination to kill all the chiefs who had signed the late treaty at Fort Wayne. There could be no peace between the Indians and the whites, he declared, until the land was ceded back. When he had finished his speech he sat down on the ground, declining a seat beside the governor. Governor Harrison, in his turn, pointed out to the In- dian that if it had been the intention of the Great Spirit that the Indians should form one nation he would have given them one language instead of a score. He told Te- cumseh that the Shawnees had no claims whatever on the ceded lands, and that they were interesting themselves where they had no business. The lands had been purchased from the Miamis, who owned it. The chief's eyes gleamed with anger as he denied these statements, and charged the governor and the President of the United States with sharp practice toward the ignorant tribesmen. The interpreter, Barron, thinking, perhaps mistakenly, that one of the chief's gestures was a signal to his Indian companions to do violence, gave the alarm. Only the calmness of the leaders prevented bloodshed. The council was broken up and the Indians withdrew to their camp. Next day Tecumseh assured the governor that no vio- lence had been intended by the Indians. The council was renev/ed, but no progress was made in the settlement of the trouble. Tecumseh and the other chiefs present stated their determination to go on in the course they had planned. Harrison informed them that their demands for the re- turn of the land could not be considered. Both parties retired from the council to prepare for war. The governor called on the United States for troops and instructions. Regulars from the forts on the Ohio were sent to Vincennes, and the militia were prepared for a campaign. The Indians began to visit Canada to secure arms. Small companies harassed the frontier, stealing horses and destroying property. These raids brought a threat from the governor, June 24, 1811, that unless they were promptly stopped he would attack the Indian towns. One month later, July 27, Tecumseh with 300 men sud- 186 HISTORY OF INDIANA denly appeared again at Vincennes, when he again asserted his friendly intentions. The governor, thinking it the plan of Tecumseh to overawe him, paraded 750 militia. After this conference in which he once more demanded the re- turn of the lands, Tecumseh sent his warriors home, and, with twenty companions, set out down the Wabash on a long mission to the southern Indians, not to return to Indi- ana till war had been begun and his league broken.^ § 35 Tippecanoe Governor Harrison received orders from the Presi- dent, early in 1811, to break up the rendezvous of the In- dians on the Wabash, if he deemed it best. Col. John P. Boyd^ was ordered to transfer the Fourth Regiment of United States troops from Pittsburg to Louisville and re- port to Harrison for orders. The governor issued a proc- lamation calling for volunteers. Among the latter were many famous Indian fighters from Kentucky — Gen. Samuel Wells, Col. Abraham Owens, Joseph H. Daviess, Col. Fred- erick Geiger, Capt. Peter Funk, and Maj. George Croghan. Captain Funk brought a company of cavalry from Louis- ville. Governor Harrison gathered up a small army of less than 1,000 men at Vincennes, with whom he intended to. establish a post higher up on the Wabash. Leaving Fort Knox September 26, he reached the highlands at Terre Haute October 3. Here he began the construction of a small fort with blockhouses at three of its angles. The fort was completed by October 28, and properly dedicated by the eloquent Kentucky lawj'er, Jo. Daviess, who named it Fort Harrison. This fort, which covered about an acre of ground, stood on a bluff two miles up the river from 3 Albach. Annals of the West, 819, seq; American State Papers, In- dian Affairs, I, 760. et passim; Rufus P>lancliard, The Discovery and Conquest of the Northwest, 242 ; J. B. Finley, Life Among the Indians, 188; Dawsou. Life of Harrison; Executive Jotirnul of Indiana Terri- tory, in Puhlications of Indiana Historical Society, II. 4 Percy Cross, Guerrilla Leaders of the World, has a biography of Col. Boyd. INDIANA AND THE WAR OF 1812 187 the old Wea village, and thirty or forty feet above the water's edge. Here signs of Indian hostility appeared ; a sentinel was shot, the frightened Delawares and Miamis came to assure Harrison of their own friendship, and to report the war- like preparations of the Prophet. A deputation of friendly Indians was sent with a letter to the Prophet, but no one ever returned. Col. James Miller, the hero later at Lundy's Lane, was left in charge of the fort. The main army left Fort Harrison October 29, and di- rected its march toward the Prophetstown. It consisted of 910 men, 250 of whom were regulars under Boyd, sixty volunteers from Kentucky, and 600 Indiana militia. The mounted men, dragoons and riflemen, numbering 270, were under command of Wells and Daviess. In order to take advantage of the more open country on the western bank, the army crossed to the west side of the Wabash near the present town of Montezuma. • The deep gorge of Pine creek was approached with care for here Clark had found the Indians in 1780, as had Hamtramck in 1790. No In- dians were seen, however, and the army marched on un- molested till it came within six miles of the Prophetstown. Indians then began to hover on the flanks of the army, so that the commander deemed it necessary to march in line of battle with front, flanks, and rear protected by scouts. The interpreters tried in vain to engage the Indians in con- versation. Dubois undertook to carry a message to the town but the threatening attitude of the savages drove him back. The army was within a mile of the town, march- ing directly upon it, when the Indians came out and begged for a conference. After friendly greetings were inter- changed, Harrison assured them of his readiness to go into council, if a suitable place for a camp could be found. A high point of ground on the banks of Burnett creek, one mile northwest of the Indian village, was pointed out. There, after exchanging promises with the chiefs that no fighting should be engaged in till the morrow, Harrison led his army into camp. The site selected was an admirable 5 J. Wesley Whicker, in the Attica Ledger-Press, August 14. 1914. 188 HISTORY OF INDIANA place for a permanent camp, but not easily guarded against an Indian surprise. Low ground, covered with tall grass, willows, and vines, surrounded it. It was, doubtless, the best camp site in the whole neighborhood. Harrison was not put off his guard by the promises of the Indians. He disposed his little army in a hollow square, conforming his lines to the sides of the highland, with pickets far out in all directions. All necessary orders were given in anticipa- tion of a night attack. The men took their positions in line and slept on their arms. The night was dark, and a drizzly rain fell at intervals. Ail was different in the camp of the red men. Women and children made hasty preparation to flee for their lives if the Indian attack should fail. Tradition has it that the Prophet called his warriors to council, brought out the Magic Bowl, the Medean Fire, and the String of Sacred Beans. The touch of these talismans, he said, made the warrior invulnerable. After a trance and a vision, he told them the time for the destruction of the white men had come; the Great Spirit was ready to lead them; and he would protect the warrior from the bullet of the paleface. The war-song and the dance followed, till, in a fit of frenzy, the warriors seized their weapons and rushed out, a lead- erless mob, to attack the Americans. The American soldiers lay quietly on their guns, few of the militia slept, till about four o'clock in the morning when the sharp crack of a sentry's rifle awoke them. The plan of the Indians had been to creep on the sentinels, tomahawk them, and then rush from all sides on the camp. It was Harrison's habit, when in the Indian country, to call his troops to arms about four o'clock, and keep them in line till broad day-light. On the morning of November 7, he was just pulling on his boots, preparatory to having the army roused, when the attack was made. The Indian army, perhaps 700 strong, rose from the grass and with a yell rushed on the camp. Many of them broke through the confused lines only to be killed instantly by the roused sol- diers. Most of the white men received the attack in line, but a few were not awakened in time. The campfires were INDIANA AND THE WAR OF 1812 189 put out and the two armies engaged in a deadly struggle, hand-to-hand in places, in places separated by ten or twenty yards. The general mounted a horse and rode to the spot where the attack was hottest, ordered the reserves to the points hardest pressed, and watched over the battle as best he could. The lines were maintained until daylight showed where the Indians were. Then attacking parties were formed and a few well directed charges drove the Indians away. Their attack had failed ; partly for want of a leader, for had a man like Little Turtle commanded the Indians it would have gone hard with the white men; partly on account of the skill of General Harrison and the remark- able behaviour of his men, many of whom had never been under fire before. The victory had been won at heavy cost ; Colonel Owens was shot as he rode with the commander toward the point of the first attack; Captain Spencer, his first and second lieutenants, and Captain Warrick, all fell in this first on- slaught; Jo. Daviess was killed in an attempt to raise the Indians by a cavalry charge; Capt. W. C. Baen, Lieut. Richard McMahan, Thomas Berry, Thomas Randolph, and Col. Isaac White also fell. Thirty-seven men lay dead on the field, and twenty-five more died from their wounds within a short time. One hundred and twenty-six were wounded, including Colonels Bartholomew and Decker, and Lieutenants Peters and Gooding. The numbers of the In- dians engaged v/ere never learned. Thirty-eight dead war- riors were left on the field. The next day after the battle Harrison gathered up his battered army, and, after destroying the Prophetstown with all its supplies, made his way slowly back to Vin- cennes, reaching Fort Knox November 18.'^- f* Harrison's official report is iciven in full in Ai)i('i-ican State Papo's, Indian Affairs, I. TTti : Alb.ich. Annals- of the West, 835; Niles Register, I, 238; Capt. Alfred Pirtle. The Battle of Tippeeanoe, Filson Glut) ]'uh- licutions, 'So. 15; Indiana Magazine of Historn, II. contains the .iouruals of John Tipton and Isaac Xaylor, both present at the battle. 190 HISTORY OF INDIANA § 36 Indian War on the Frontier The defeat of the Prophet broke up his town at the mouth of the Tippecanoe. Leaving the Wabash tribes, among whom he was thoroughly discredited, he started on a long tour among the Pottawattomies, Kickapoos, and Winnebagoes. As a result of his work, bands of these In- dians appeared on the remote frontiers. Murders were committed at Chicago, and along the west side of the Wa- bash. Nearly all the advanced settlements were abandoned, the settlers falling back on the more populous communities. Governor Harrison gave orders, April 16, 1812, to the mi- litia to hold themselves in readiness for immediate action. Little Turtle, the aged chief of the Miamis, sent word from his home near Fort Wayne that the Miamis still stood by their treaty vow of friendship, though English agents were among them urging them on to war. The Delawares likewise renewed their pledge of friendship. B. F. Stickney, the Indian agent at Fort Wayne, re- ported that a grand council of all the tribes met on the Mississinewa May 21, 1812, Twelve tribes were repre- sented. The council lasted two days. English agents again urged the tribes to united war, but all the Indian speakers expressed opposition to a renewal of the struggle. These agents urged the Indians to visit Maiden, where they would be presented with arms and ammunition. Stickney wrote that bands of Indians were passing Fort Wayne every day on the way to or from Maiden. The Pottawattomie chief, Marpack, collected an army of hostile savages in the forest south of Detroit. This army seems to have been provi- sioned and armed by the English at Maiden. Meanwhile the frontier of Indiana was put in a state of defense. A row of blockhouses, or forts as they were called by the settlers, was constructed from Vincennes to Greenville. From May to August, always a time of great scarcity among the Indians, little damage was done on the border, but all were fearful of outbreaks as soon as the roasting-ear season opened. In the meantime war was declared with England and INDIANA AND THE WAR OF 1812 191 Gen. William Hull, governor of Michigan, was sent to De- troit with a United States army. The first blow of the Indian war was destined to fall on Fort Dearborn, where Chicago is now. On August 7, 1812, Capt. Nathan Heaid received orders from General Hull to evacuate the fort and join the general at Detroit. Winnamac, a friendly Pottawattomie chief, the bearer of the dispatch, advised Captain Heald not to leave the fort. The Indians, as Winnamac well knew, were on the war- path. Captain Heald, in defiance of the advice of every- body, distributed his goods to the Indians, destroyed his ammunition and guns, dismantled the fort, and set out on the march to Fort Wayne. Captain Wells with a relief party of friendly Miamis came just in time to join in the retreat. As all but the rash commander expected, the little gar- rison, and women and children accompanying it, were at- tacked as soon as they were well out of the fort. Fifty- two men, women, and children were killed and twenty-eight captured." Captain Heald showed in this affair about the same judgment and ability as his superior, General Hull, did in the surrender of Detroit the next day. These two disasters left Indiana exposed to the full brunt of the In- dian attack. The storm broke along the whole frontier in early September.*^ The massacre of the garrison at Fort Dearborn was the signal for a general uprising among the northwestern Indians. Only a few Miamis and Delawares, under the influence of Little Turtle, remained friendly to the whites. Blackbird, who had led in the massacre at Fort Dearborn, pushed on rapidly toward Fort Wayne with his Indian army. The fall of Macinac, Fort Dearborn, and Detroit destroyed all American authority. Tecumseh hurried from tribe to tribe urging union in action. All were to join in one grand attack to sweep the invaders across the Ohio. 7 Milo Qunife. Chicago (tnd Ihc Old NorihivvKt, index: m ni.niuscript letter by W. J. Jordan, an officer under Heald, throws light on the massacre. 8 Historical Register, II, ch. I, No. 15. 192 HISTORY OF INDIANA The British general, Henry Procter, assisted Tecumseh in planning the attack. September 1 was the time set when the attack should be delivered at Forts Wayne and Harri- son. Major Muir with a small force of British regulars was to march up the Maumee and assist at the capture of Fort Wayne. The garrison at the latter fort numbered about seventy, under the command of Capt. James Rhea. The fort also contained four small cannon. As early as August 28, par- ties of savages were seen loafing around in the neighbor- hood. Their purpose no doubt was to take advantage of any opportunity that might be offered to kill any soldiers that might stray too far from the fortifications. The Miamis in the neighborhood still professed friendship and tried several times to gain admission to the fort. All tricks having failed, the Indians opened fire on the sentinels of Fort Wayne on the night of September 5. An ambush cleverly planned on the morning of September 6 resulted in the death of two soldiers of the garrison. That night a direct assault was made on the fort in which, al- though about 600 strong, the red men were beaten back from the palisades without loss or damage to the garrison. The next scheme was to frighten the garrison by means of a Quaker battery which they constructed and placed in po- sition during the night. An Indian flag the next morning announced to the amused garrison that the British had sent a battery, and unless the fort was surrendered immediately it would be battered down and the garrison put to the tor- ture. There was perfect quiet then for three days, at the end of which time the Indians again resumed firing, which they continued briskly for twelve hours. On the follow- ing day the soldiers were startled by a frightful war-whoop resounding from all parts of the surrounding forest. An- other desperate but fruitless assault followed. General Harrison, who was stationed over at Piqua, Ohio, with an army, had sent Maj. William Oliver to notify the garrison that he was on his way with relief. Oliver reached the fort after some remarkable feats of daring, and it was the news he brought that nerved the little gai ri- INDIANA AND THE WAR OF 1812 193 son through the seven days' battle. At the approach of the reinforcements, September 12, the Indians retired.-* For the purposes of terrorizing the border and pre- venting any aid being sent to Fort Wayne or Fort Harri- son, a band of warriors penetrated the forests to the Pigeon Roost Settlement in the northern part of what is now Scott county September 3. Two men hunting on the outskirts of the little community were murdered. The Indians then fell on the unprotected settlement and killed, within one hour, another man, five women, and sixteen children. The murders were accompanied with all the cruelty of which the Indians were capable. William Collings, a man past 60 years of age, defended his house successfully against the cowardly wretches. The Clark county militia were immediately called out and proceeded to the Pigeon Roost Settlement. Next day two companies of militia followed the trail of the Indians till dark, but gave it up. The Indians, numbering not more than a dozen, were thus allowed to escape without punish- ment.^" At almost the same hour when Payne and Coffman, the hunters, were killed at the Pigeon Roost, two workmen were killed near Fort Harrison. The next day a party of Indians, chiefs from the Winnebago, Kickapoo, Pottawat- tomie, and Shawnee tribes, came to the fort and asked the commander, Capt. Zachary Taylor, for a conference the next day. They were from the Prophetstown, and Taylor suspected at once that they were on the warpath. The next Captain Taylor heard of them was when he was awakened at eleven o'clock that night by the report of a sentinel's rifle. The captain rushed out of his quarters to find that the Indians had fired the blockhouse at the lower " Blaucliiird, Discorcnj and Conquest of the 'Sorthicest, 289; Benson J. Lossiug. Pietorial Field Book of War of 1812, 315; Historieal Regis- ter, II. ch. 3, No. 2; Wallace A. Bryce. History of Fort Wayne; Mann Butler. History of Kentucliy. 10 Charles Martindale, Publications of Indiana Historical Society, II; Dillon, History of Indiana. 492; Good accounts are in Western Sun, Sep- tember 26 and October 6. 1812. Lossing. Field Book of War of 1812, 314; John Ketcham. Reminiscenses ; John C. Lazeuby, in Indiana Maga- zine of History, X. 263. 194 HISTORY OF INDIANA corner of the fort. Of the fifty men in the garrison over half, including Captain Taylor himself, were on the sick list. By the time Taylor had paraded his troops the block- house, where all the supplies except the powder were kept, was burning rapidly, and the Indians were pressing the at- tack. The prospect looked gloomy. Some of the soldiers who responded were too weak to stand up. Two of the ablest jumped over the palisade and attempted to escape. Nothing saved the fort from destruction but the spirit of the captain. The blockhouse burned, but the barracks were saved by heroic efforts. The gap in the wall was only twenty feet and no Indian dared enter it. The troops were properly placed, order was restored, men repaired the fort where the fire had damaged it, and by daylight the Indians were repulsed. The Indians merely drew back to the cover of the woods. It was necessary to get word to Vincennes. At length after several failures a messenger, on a dark night, succeeded in passing the Indian lines and reaching Vincennes. Col. Wil- liam Russell, who was collecting an army to make an attack on the upper Wabash towns, pushed on up the valley after receiving Taylor's letter, and soon relieved the fort. Cap- tain Taylor had lost six men, three killed and three wound- ed. Of the two cowards who attempted to run away, one ran directly into the hands of the Indians, by whom he was killed; the other was driven back to the walls of the fort by the Indians, and sneaked inside after they were re- pulsed.^i General Harrison reached Fort Wayne September 12, 1812, with over 2,000 men. Disappointed in not meeting the Indians in battle, he determined to punish the tribes- men at once. After resting his men a few days he divided them into several battalions. One of these, under Colonel Simrall, was sent to destroy the town of Little Turtle on Eel river. Col. Samuel Wells led another division against the town of Chief Five Medals of the Pottawattomies on ^^ Niles' Register, III, 90; this gives Taylor's official report. Loss- ing. Field Book of War of 1812, 317 ; Historical Register, II, ch. 3^ No. S. INDIANA AND THE WAR OF 1812 195 the Elkhart. Colonel Payne led still another division down to the forks of the Wabash to destroy the Miami towns in that neighborhood. All these towns were deserted by the Indians. Years of peace had taught the Indians many of the simpler arts of civilization. Large fields of growing corn surrounded the villages. Log huts had largely taken the places of the earlier wigwams. Everything nevertheless was included in the vengeance of the invaders except the house of Little Turtle, built for him by the government at his village on Eel river. That aged chief had passed away July 21, 1812, and had been buried with military honors by the garrison at Fort Wayne. A worse blow than the destruction of their towns could not have been inflicted on the savages. During the approaching winter there was nothing for them to do but go to Maiden and beg from the British. Harrison left his army under command of Gen. James Winchester while he hastened over to Piqua to organize forces for the recovery of Detroit. Winchester soon moved down the Maumee and the scene of war drifted over into Ohio.i^ The urgent message of Captain Taylor, as noted above, brought Col. William Russell posthaste from Vincennes v/ith 1,200 men. Russell reached Fort Harrison with his army September 16, without having seen the enemy, but his provision train, together with an escort of eleven men, fell into the hands of the savages. A regiment of Ken- tucky volunteers under Colonel Wilcox remained at Fort Harrison. Russell with the remainder hastened back to Vincennes, as he had been on his way to join Governor Ninian Edwards of Illinois in an attack on the Kickapoo Indians on Peoria Lake. Meanwhile Kentucky volunteers kept arriving at Vin- cennes and joining Gen. Samuel Hopkins until that com- mander found himself in charge of a well-equipped army of 4,000 men, 2,000 of whom were expert riflemen well mounted. On October 10, he left Vincennes with the '^'■^ Historical Register, II, ch. 3. No. 11. 196 HISTORY OF INDIANA mounted riflemen on an expedition against the Illinois tribes on the Illinois river. In four days he reached Fort Harrison, crossed the Wabash, and camped on the edge of the great prairie. On October 20, after meeting a prairie fire which did no damage, the army refused to march further. The general called for 500 volunteers to go on with him, but no one responded. The infamous rabble then came back to Vincennes and was dismissed from the service. As mentioned above. Colonel Russell was to join the governor of Illinois and cooperate with Hopkins in an at- tack. Russell with two companies of United States regu- lars left Vincennes October 11, 1812, and, joining Gov- ernor Edwards, fell on the principal Kickapoo town at the head of Peoria Lake, inflicting a severe defeat on the Indians. More than a score of warriors were killed. After returning to Vincennes and dismissing his muti- nous troops. General Hopkins organized an expedition of 1,200 infantry, with which he set out up the Wabash for the purpose of destroying the Prophetstown. His three regiments were commanded by Colonels Barbour, Miller, and Wilcox, while Captain Taylor led the regulars. On November 11 he left Fort Harrison by the road Governor Harrison had made the previous year. The expedition con- tinued up the east side of the Wabash and reached the Prophetstown November 19. Butler was sent from there with 300 men to destroy a Winnebago town near the mouth of Wildcat creek. The Prophetstown and a large Kickapoo village of 160 huts, a short distance down the river, to- gether with a large amount of provisions stored in the three towns, were destroyed. No Indians were met until two days later when a small force of soldiers were attacked and one man killed. On the next morning a party of sixty horsemen were ambushed on Wild Cat creek and eighteen killed. The Indian camp was broken up, but, the weather suddenly turning bitter cold, the army returned hastily to Vincennes.^^^ Driven from their home towns, the Miamis, now nearly all in the service of the British, had gathered in the Mis- 1?' Hopkins" Reitorts are given in VvVr.s-' Rr(/istcr. III. 171. 100 and "Jol. INDIANA AND THE WAR OF 1812 197 sissinewa towns. There they had been joined by the Dela- wares and the Munsees from White river. They were in threatening distance of the settlements both in Indiana and Ohio. For this reason General Harrison, then at Frank- linton, Ohio, decided to destroy them. A strong column was accordingly made up of Colonel Simrall's Kentucky dragoons, some United States dragoons under Maj. James V. Ball, a corps of United States regulars, and some Penn- sylvania riflemen. The force numbered about 600 men. On November 25, 1812, Col. John B. Campbell, who com- manded the expedition, left camp for the attack on the Mississinewa towns. His route led by Springfield, Xenia, Dayton, Eaton, and Greenville. At Dayton he was delayed till December 14, by the lack of horses. Winter had set in and the frozen ground was covered with a mantle of snow. By forced marches he covered the remaining eighty miles in three days. In the early morning light of December 17, the troops attacked an Indian town, killed eight warriors, took forty prisoners, and burned the town. Leaving the prisoners in charge of the infantry, the horsemen pushed on down the river and destroyed three villages, among them that of the Munsee chief. Silver Heels, with their winter stores, in- cluding quite a number of cattle and horses. That night they returned to the infantry and went into camp. This camp was on the north bank of the Mississinewa river, near the mouth of Metociniah creek, about a mile from the pres- ent village of Jalapa, in Grant county. The troops camped in the form of a square, the angles protected by light forti- fications. Here about five o'clock the next morning they were furi- ously attacked by a force of about 300 Indians who had crept up under cover of a rocky bluff on the north bank of the river. For over an hour a bloody battle raged at close quarters. The onslaught was desperate and it was met bravely. Captain Pierce, who commanded the guard, was tomahawked as he stubbornly contested the battle. With the coming of daylight the fire of the riflemen put the Indians to rout, but not until they had killed eight (14) 198 HISTORY OF INDIANA and wounded forty-two white men. Fifteen Indians were found dead on the field. The expedition made its way slowly back to headquarters at Franklinton, and the fight- ing in Indiana was over for the year.'^ § 37 Life on the Frontier Every possible precaution was taken by the territorial and national governments to protect the Indiana frontier during the year 1813. Three plans were adopted to insure the safety of the settlers. First — Enough blockhouses were constructed so that each farmer could leave his family in one. This necessi- tated one in every settlement. Within the present limits of Knox, Daviess, Martin, Orange, Jackson, Bartholomew, Jennings, Ripley, Franklin, Decatur, and Wayne counties most of these forts were located, although some were lo- cated farther from the border in Gibson, Pike, Clark, and Washington counties. Second — The militia were organized carefully and some of them kept on duty all the time. The reports show that Indiana had 4,160 men enrolled. Added to these were large numbers of Kentuckians who volunteered for duty in Indiana. While the militia were not under very strict discipline they did much hard service, usually furnishing their own arms and provisions. There were five or six regiments. Sixteen companies were called into active service. Third — The United States employed from one to five companies of rangers — militia sworn into United States service. At first a single company was organized to guard the country around Vincennes. On November 23, 1812, Jonathan Jennings, the Indiana delegate, offered a resolu- tion in Congress giving the President power to organize two more companies. Reports were coming in daily show- ing that raids were being committed by the Indians along i4Lossing, Field Book of the War of 1812. 347; Nlles' Register, III, 30(): Sarah J. Line, in Indiana Mai/aziiir of Histori/, IX, 187; Camp- bell's Report to Harrison is in the State Papers, 152, and Historical Register, II, 40. INDIANA AND THE WAR OF 1812 199 a border of 200 miles in Indiana. By act of February 25, 1813, the President was given authority to raise ten addi- tional companies. Acting under this law, the President au- thorized Acting Governor Gibson to organize four new com- panies of rangers. Each company consisted of about 100 men commanded by a captain. No attacks in force were made by the Indians in Indiana during the latter years of the war. During the early months of 1813 they kept the border in terror by a series of petty raids. Scouting parties penetrated deep into the settle- ments to steal and murder. A man was killed on the Wa- bash below the mouth of White river ; a week later two men were killed just below Vincennes on the Illinois side. Ten days later, March 13, two men were killed ten miles from Brookville in Franklin county. On the same day three men were killed in Wayne county. Five days later one man was killed and three wounded near Vallonia, in Bartholomew county. On March 28, a party of men in boats were at- tacked below Fort Harrison, two of whom were killed and six wounded. On April 16, two men were killed eight miles west of Vallonia. ^^ Such outrages as those just mentioned naturally called for vigorous effort on the part of the rangers. The In- dians found the swamps and dense forests of Driftwood a complete mask to their depredations. They would slip into a neighborhood, kill a farmer, preferably at daybreak when he came out to feed his stock, gather up the horses on the place, and disappear into the impenetrable thickets of Drift- wood before the rangers could get on the trail. At first the rangers tried to patrol the whole frontier, but this was soon found useless. Next, small companies were stationed at advantageous places with orders to pur- sue any savages that made their appearance. As stated above, a man was killed near Vallonia March 18. Maj. John Tipton, the most skillful of the rangers, 3 5 The best accounts of these outrages are given hi N lies' Register, and the Western Sun. These were contemporary papers; for other accounts see .Tohn Ketchani's Autohiography; writings of John Tipton ; letters printed in Cockruni's Pioneer History of Iiidiniia : and various county histories. 200 HISTORY OF INDIANA with twenty-nine men took up the trail of the savages. Twenty-five miles up Driftwood he found them camped on an Island. Several of the Indians were killed, the rest escaping by swimming the river. On April 16, the same captain with thirty-one men took the trail of a band of Indians who had murdered two men west of Vallonia. Swimming five streams, wading for miles in swamps waist deep, in almost continuous rain, he followed them three days before he overtook them. He intended to surprise them in their camp that night, but following too closely, they came upon an Indian who had stopped to fix his pack. Warned by the shot, the Indian's companions abandoned their horses and fled, following the high hills bordering Salt creek toward the Delaware towns on White river. These and other evidences led the people to believe that the Delaware Indians on upper White river were doing the mischief on the border. For the purpose of destroying these towns Col. Joseph Bartholomew, commander-in-chief of the militia, mustered an expedition of 137 men at Val- lonia in June, 1813. There were three companies of rangers under Captains Williamson Dunn, James Bigger, and C. Peyton, John Tipton and David Owen acting as guides.^" They left Vallonia June 11, and in four days reached the Delaware towns 100 miles distant. The towns were already deserted and most of them burned. Twelve miles lower down, another town was found with a plentiful sup- ply of corn. A small party of Indians on their way to this town after corn was attacked and one of them killed. It was thought that the Indians were using these towns as a half-way place in their attacks on the settlements. Every- thing was destroyed and the expedition returned home, ar- riving June 21. With a view to further punishment of the Indians, Col. William Russell of the Seventh United States regulars, and commander of the department, gathered another force at Vallonia as soon as Bartholomew had returned, to strike If' The roster of these conipjinies is given in .John Ketcham's Auto- hio!n'(tph]i. INDIANA AND THE WAR OF 1812 201 the towns on the lower Mississinewa. He left camp at Vallonia July 1, with 573 men and marched by way of the Delaware towns to the Mississinewa. He found these towns all deserted. It seems no Indians had been there since early spring. From there, Russell marched to the Eel River village, thence to Winnamac, Prophetstown, the Winnebago town on Wild Cat creek, and thence to Fort Harrison. Not an Indian was seen. Small parties left the main force at the Prophetstown and crossed over to the settlements on the Ohio river, but no trace of savages could be found. All the old Indian fighters of Indiana and Ken- tucky, among them Maj. Zachary Taylor, joined Russell in the invasion. It showed beyond a doubt that the Indian power in Indiana was broken. ^'^ Aftr the Indians had been defeated at Fort Wayne and Fort Harrison, especially after the bloody disaster on the Mississinewa, the discouraged warriors began to withdraw out of harm's way. The Miamis and Delawares, who had avowed friendship for the white people, moved over into Ohio under the immediate protection of the American army. The Shawnees, together with those Miamis who had joined them, under the Prophet returned to Detroit and placed themselves under the protection of the British. The British were forced to evacuate Detroit in Septem- ber, 1813. A few days later they were annihilated at the Battle of the Thames. Tecumseh was killed. There was no choice left for the Indians but to make the best possible terms of peace with their enemies, the Americans. Otta- was, Chippewas, Pottawattomies, Kickapoos, and Miamis came to Detroit and asked that the war cease. Their con- dition was pitiable. The women and children were naked and starving. They hardly dared go on hunting trips for fear of the American rangers, who took no prisoners. The haughty warriors, who a year before had met in high spir- it Dillon, History of Indiana, 520, seq. An Autobiography, by John Ketchaiu; gives an excellent picture of conditions nronnd Vallonia. The mustei" rolls of the ranker companies are given, those of James Bigger and Williamson Dunn entire. An excellent contemporary ac- count of the War of 1812 is a History of the Late War, by an American, Baltimore, 1816. 202 HISTORY OF INDIANA its and plotted to drive the Americans across the Ohio, were now compelled to beg bread at the hands of their con- querors. An armistice was agreed to between Major General Harrison and the assembled tribes at Detroit October 14, 1813. Over 3,000 Indians at Detroit and 1,500 at Fort Wayne had to be fed by the government during the follow- ing winter. The women and children were provided with clothing and shelter and the warrior^s with guns and ammu- nition that they might again engage in the chase. On July 8, 1814, General Harrison and Gen. Lewis Cass met the tribes at Greenville and explained to them the terms of a new treaty. This treaty, the Second Treaty of Greenville, did not materially change the relation between the whites and savages. The war was extremely disastrous to the red men.- It left them a hopeless, sullen, broken people. Had it not been for the interference of the English they could have been spared the humiliation. The English drew the storm down upon them and then gave them no aid. From the fall of Detroit to the defeat on the Thames the British troops did none of the fighting. The conduct of the Eng- lish was as cowardly as it was disastrous to the Indians. The latter had made considerable progress in civilized life before the war, but this was all destroyed. What was worse, the pioneers lost all respect for them, and began a systematic effort to drive them from the border. CHAPTER IX from territory to state § 38 New Settlements The year 1800 found very few settlers in what is now Indiana. The Treaty of Greenville in 1795 had established the boundary line between the land of the United States and that set apart for the northwestern Indians and had given to the Indians all lands within the State except a small tract; six miles square where Fort Wayne now stands; a tract two miles square on the Wabash, where the portage path from Fort Wayne struck the river; a tract six miles square on the Wabash river at Ouiatanon; 149,000 acres at the Falls of the Ohio, known as Clark's Grant; the land around Vincennes, and a strip of land lying east of the line drawn from Fort Recovery down to the Ohio river oppo- site the mouth of the Kentucky. Almost all of the white inhabitants lived under the pro- tection of the stockade at the post of Vincennes. What farming there was, was done in the immediate neighbor- hood of that post. Few Americans had settled at Vin- cennes thus early. On the north side of the Ohio river, at the Falls, there were a few settlers on Clark's Grant. This tract, embracing 149,000 acres, had been conveyed by the General Assembly of Virginia in 1786 to General Clark and his soldiers as payment for their services in cap- turing Vincennes and Kaskaskia. The townsite of Clarksville had been laid out in 1783. Emigrants began to arrive soon afterwards. The village of Springville with its stockade, Fort Steuben, and its com- pany of soldiers, was most attractive to these new settlers. This village became the county seat of Clark county, and remained so until 1802, when Jeffersonville was founded 204 HISTORY OF INDIANA and made the county seat. It is said that this latter city- was planned by Thomas Jefferson. Only alternate squares were to be used for building sites, the others being reserved as parks and city gardens. Among the distinguished citizens of this early settle- ment were the first governor, Jonathan Jennings, a New Jersey Presbyterian, Gen. John Carr of Pennsylvania, who served with distinction in the Battle of Tippecanoe and in the War of 1812, and Judge Charles Dewey of Massachu- setts, a leading lawyer and lawmaker in the early history of the State. Another settlement that dates back into the eighteenth century was in Dearborn county. This settlement was in and around where Aurora now stands, and the Morrisons, Cards, Gerald, Hardins, and Grays were among the early settlers. A mill was built here in 1800. The Baptist church was organized in 1807. Lawrenceburg, the county seat, was laid out in 1802 by Samuel Vance, James Hamil- ton, and Benjamin Chambers, all of whom had seen service in the Revolution. Switzerland county was also inhabited at this time, a settlement having been made in 1795 by Heathcote Pickett and family near Plum creek, about three miles above Vevay. This family was joined during the next two or three years by the Dickinson, Cotton, and Gullion families, who settled on the lowlands along the river. During the year 1796 there came to this neighborhood John and James Dufour from Canton Vaud, Sv/itzerland. They were looking for a location for a colonization society, and made the selection of this land between Indian and Plum creeks, purchasing from Congress 2,560 acres. The company did not reach the new home until 1803. These Swiss reestablished their old Vevay of Switzerland in the new Vevay in Switzerland county, Indiana. All told, the settlers in the four counties did not exceed 1,000 persons. Besides these there were numerous hunt- ers, trappers, and squatters along the western, southwest- em and southern borders. About these there is an end- less amount of tradition in the border counties, and many FROM TERRITORY TO STATE 205 01 the traditions have been preserved in the county his- tories. It is impossible in discussing the early settlements of any of the western States to do more than indicate the main lines of immigration. The movement was like the skirmish line of a great army searching out every nook and corner of the new country. The pioneers advanced along all pos- sible lines of travel and located in the most unexpected places. Many of their actions are unexplainable to us after the lapse of a century. The prevalence of game and pure water was an attraction that led many of them. Others kept to the highland to avoid the fevers and the ague. Some sought the timber-land; others for exactly opposite rea- sons sought the prairies. No single explanation will fit many cases. It is impossible to get an adequate description of the migration. The progress, however, was not different from that of the settlement of the other early western States. An impartial history would compel us to tell the story of every individual settler, since there is little reason why one settler or one settlement was more significant than another. There was no waiting for Indians to become quiet, no wait- ing for roads to be built, no waiting until the government had built stockades, or sent troops to furnish adequate pro- tection. As game became scarce in the woods of Kentucky and Ohio, the hunters crossed into Indiana. When they found suitable locations, they became squatters. When the land ofiice opened in the neighborhood, they became settlers, and when a few more joined them, a government was or- ganized and they became citizens. Thus in 1800, Woolsey Pride settled at White Oak Springs, Pike county. The fol- lowing year he was joined by the Mileys, Conrads, Tislows, Smiths, and Alexanders. By 1811 a good sized community had been formed and a stockade fort was erected on the present site of Petersburg. As early as 1800, white men crossed over into Harrison county from Brandenburg for purposes of hunting and farming. In 1802 Squire Boone, brother of Daniel and Mose Boone, settled in Grassy Valley, back six miles from 206 HISTORY OF INDIANA the Ohio. Dennis Pennington came the same year. Be- fore the close of 1807, Samuel Pfrimmer, Davis Floyd, Thomas Posey, and Thomas Wilson had formed a numerous neighborhood. Frederick Mauck had established a ferry at what is now Mauckport as early as 1808. No ferry on the lower Ohio was used by more emigrants than this. Gen- eral Harrison bought a farm at Wilson's Spring near Blue river and erected a mill in 1806. Corydon was laid out in 1808 by R. M. Heth. It was from this stream of immigration crossing at Mauckport and Oatman's Ferry that the first settlers of Floyd county, Robert La Follette and Patrick Shields, came. They located at Georgetown in 1804, at least eight years before the Scribner Brothers laid out the town of New Albany. Some time during the year 1805-6 Jesse Vawter led a small company across the Ohio at what is now Madison and opened up a settlement on the hill back of the town. This was six years before John Paul entered the townsite of Madison and laid off the town. Other settlers went deeper into the forests of Indiana, and, in a few years, the second tier of counties began to fill up. A party of hunters, led by John Kimberlin and his two sons, settled on Kimberlin creek in Scott county early in the year 1805, and erected a cabin of white oak logs. William Flemming, Peter Storms, Hiram Wingate, and William Estil are some of those who followed in the succeeding years. In 1810 was laid out the town of Lex- ington, one of the oldest towns in the State. Here a bank was established in 1815 and a paper published, called the Western Eagle. In the same year in which these early settlers located in Scott county other immigrants were crossing the Ohio at points in Warrick county. Among the first was Bailey Anderson, for whom Anderson township was named. Hud- son Hargrave, Joseph DeForest, Ratliff Boone, for whom Boone township was named, Thomas Campbell, for whom Campbell township was named, and John Hart, for whom Hart township was named, followed at about the same time. FROM TERRITORY TO STATE 207 These men went to Henderson, Kentucky, to have their wheat ground into flour. Booneville was established in 1818 and named for Ratliff Boone. The first settlers of Daviess county were from the Caro- linas and Kentucky. In 1806 came Eli Hawkins from South Carolina, He located near Maysville. A small part of western Daviess county was included in the Vincennes survey, the lines running at an angle of forty-five degrees from north to south. On these lands along the east bank of White river most of the early settlers located. Daviess was one of the counties most exposed to Indian depreda- tions. To protect its fifty-five families five forts were built during the winer of 1811 and 1812. These were named from their location, Purcell's, Comer's, Ballow's, Coleman's, and Hawkins's. Three forts were added during the war — Flora's, Palmer's, and Jones's. This is mentioned, not because it was a condition peculiar to Daviess county, but because it was the common thing in all the counties settled before 1812. There were from six to fifteen families gath- ered around each fort. Each fort, therefore, had a garri- son of about twenty rifles. Remains of similar forts are yet to be seen on the west side of White river in Knox county. All these forts were in Knox county at that time, since Daviess was not organized till 1817, at which time Washington was located and platted. The settlers men- tioned came by the Wabash and White rivers. The early settlers of Posey county, the Duckworths, Mc- Faddens, Hutchinsons, Lynns, and the Wagners, came from Virginia, Carolina, Kentucky, and Pennsylvania. The dense forests of Posey county were fine hunting grounds, but they looked rather formidable to the prospective farm- ers. The settlers located about 1807. Audibon, the nat- uralist, was a frequent visitor in this county. Evansville was settled by Col. Hugh McGary in 1812. About the same year in which the hunters were pene- trating the wilderness of Posey county, others were making their way into what came to be Gibson county. Here came William Herrington, Jesse Montgomery, Daniel Postman, first judge of the county, Robert M. Evans, for whom 208 HISTORY OF INDIANA Evansvilie is named, James Hazelton, Thomas Chapman, who was the founder of Princeton, and others. The first settlement was a short distance west of where Princeton now stands. Princeton was laid out in 1814. In 1806 the settlers braved the hills of Crawford county, settling in the northern part. It seems that the first set- tlers were a part of a large colony that scattered over the northern part of Harrison county and the southern part of Orange and Washington counties. Among those who came to Crawford county were Thomas Stroud, E. E. Morgan, William McKee, and William Frakes. In 1807 came Peter Frakes, William Van Winkle, John Peckinpaugh, followed shortly by Captain Posey, the Conrads, the Clarks, and the Leavenworths. The latter laid out the town of Leaven- Vv'-orth in 1818. This county was a great hunting ground at that time. About the same time the settlers crossed to the east bank of the White river in Daviess, others crossed the Ohio at various points in what is now Perry county, and so closed up the last gap in the front of the invading army. The Perry county pioneers located on the Ohio or nearby on the tributary creeks. William Taylor and Joseph Wright settled at Rome, Thomas and Rev. Charles Polk in Polk's Bottom just below. In 1811 Mr. Richardson built a grist mill on Deer creek. Uriah Cummings built a sawmill on Poison in 1812. This does not intend to mean that these were the first white persons in the county, for the head- waters of Deer creek. Poison, Anderson, and Oil creeks were fine game ranges, to say nothing of the natural shel- ters of their overhanging cliff's, some of which will shelter a regiment of men in any kind of weather. There were springs of pure water and hills free from malaria and "milk sickness." Here hunters and squatters had lived for at least ten years before the first land entries were made. It is not possible much further to note the progress of this invading army of settlers, crossing the Ohio into Indi- ana or entering by the Ohio river from the east. Its picket lines kept pushing on into the northern wilderness along FROM TERRITORY TO STATE 209 the valleys or going boldly through the forest where there was no stream. In 1810 its outposts were in Lawrence and Monroe coun- ties. In the same year settlers located down at Mt. Pleas- ant in Martin county. A year later others located in and about Vallonia in Jackson county. They crept steadily up the Whitewater, appearing in Fayette county in 1813, in Ripley in 1814, in Jennings in 1815, Randolph in 1816, in Hancock, Rush and Shelby in 1818. The western wing pushed up the Wabash and White rivers, settling at Spen- cer in 1815; at Gosport almost the same time; at Terre Haute in 1816 ; in Greene county in 1817 ; in Morgan county in 1819; in Vermillion in 1816, and in Clinton in 1818. ^ The first results of the War of 1812 on the development of Indiana Territory were disastrous. The inroads of the Indians during 1812 broke up many settlements. The Maria Creek Settlement in Knox county, the frontier then on the Wabash, was abandoned. The women and children were taken back to Vincennes or further south, some being taken back to their old homes across the Ohio.- The settlers around the forks of White river were huddled together in the little forts. Their friends back at home, who were making preparations to come out to the new country, were warned of the danger and instructed to stay at home till the storm subsided. Around Vallonia a large number of settlers were held, protected by the rangers, and a spacious fort, though even from here many withdrew to Clark county, and it was thought for a time that the little colony would break up. The Pigeon Roost Massacre drove the 1 The best siugle reference on the early settlements of Indiana is in Illustrated Historical Atlas of Indiana, puhlished in 1876 by Bas- kin, Forster & Co. The various county histories give valuable data, such as Young's History of Wayne County; a History of Dearborn County; a History of Knox and Daviess Counties, and others have valuable reminiscenses and facts drawn from the county records. No comprehensive first-hand study of the subject has been made. Much valuable material is contained in papers read at "Old Settlers' Meet- ings," but no collection of these is available. Waldo Mitchell, "Growth of Indiana, 1812-1820," Indiana Magazine of History, December, 1914; Carlos T. McCarty. "Hindostan, a Pioneer Town." Indiana Magazine of History, June, 1914. 2 Indiana Magazine of History. "Polke Memoirs." Vol. X, No. 1. 210 HISTORY OF INDIANA pioneers of Clark and Jefferson counties back on the pro- tection of the Ohio river settlements. On the Whitewater the Quakers maintained an advanced position in Wayne county, protected by such small stockades as Boyd's Fort. Few if any of these settlers had advanced beyond the line of the National Road. Salisbury was the center of this settlement. It will be noticed that the frontier line of 1812 extended from Vincennes east almost to Jefferson county, thence following roughly the line of the Twelve Mile Purchase north of the line of the National Road. Except for the finger of settlement running up the Whitewater Valley the line of settlement is pretty accurately marked now by the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad. To the north of this line no white persons lived, except, perhaps, a few traders around such posts as Fort Wayne, Andersontown, and Terre Haute. The editor of Niles' Register, August 6, 1814, in sum- ming up the situation of the West, called Indiana a great tract of rich land, well watered by such fine streams as the Ohio, Wabash, White, and Whitewater rivers, which but for Indian interference would long before have had a numerous population. The census of 1810 showed 24,526 persons, of whom only 237 were slaves. § 39 Removal of the Territorial Capital to Corydon From the time John Gibson arrived at Vincennes, July 4, 1800, to May 1, 1813, that town was the capital of Indi- ana territory. There was no hope even among its own citi- zens that it would remain the permanent State capital. It seems to have been the general understanding that the Northwest Territory would be devided by the great Miami and the Wabash. This would inevitably leave Vincennes on the boundary. As long, however, as Indiana Territory in- cluded the Illinois Country, Vincennes would remain the capital. With the organization of Illinois Territory Feb- ruary 3, 1809, the balance of power in the Indiana As- 212 HISTORY OF INDIANA sembly shifted to the east and the struggle for the removal of the capital began. The Territorial Assembly, however, soon found an ob- stacle in its road. The governor, who owned valuable property in Vincennes, had an absolute veto on all its bills. This was no merely imaginary danger, for Deputy Jennings presented a memorial to Congress January 20, 1812, complaining of the arbitrary conduct of the governor in vetoing a bill to change the location of the capital. The matter of relocation came up at the 1810 session of the Assembly. Lawrenceburg, Vevay, Madison, Jeffer- sonville, and Corydon were aspirants. The question was referred to a committee instructed to select a new site. This site was to be north of Driftwood, east of White river and at least twenty miles from the Indiana boundary which then ran from near the present site of Covington to a point about twenty miles east of where Mitchell now stands. It was to be as nearly central as possible to Green- ville (Ohio), Madison, New Harmony, and Covington, the four corners of the inhabited part of the territory. If the committee failed to agree it was to lay its evidence before the governor, who was then to make the final selection. A petition was at once prepared and sent to Congress asking a donation of four sections of land on the main branch of White river.-' Nothing came of this effort. The War of 1812 pre- vented a meeting of the Assembly during 1812. As soon as the Assembly of 1813 convened the fight for relocation was again taken up. Madison, through its representative, William McFarland, of Lexington, offered $10,000 as a bonus. The vote on this in the Council stood four to four. James Dili, of Dearborn, then submitted a proposition from Lawrenceburg, and a bill to make that place the capital passed to third reading before it failed. Vevay was tried, and the vote stood five to three against it. Charlestown failed by the same vote. Clarksville received two votes. Jeffersonville received a tie vote. Corydon got a tie vote 3 Annals, Eleventh Cong., 508. Ibid. 748, for favoriible report of cougressional committee. FROM TERRITORY TO STATE 213 also. The eastern members controlled the House of Rep- resentatives and chose Madison. The Council would not vote for it, however, and in a conference Corydon was se- lected. The act bears date March 11, 1813, and further provided that officers and offices should be at Corydon by May 1, 1813.4 § 40 The Enabling Act Since the outbreak of the War of 1812 there had been agitation among the inhabitants of the territory for a State government. Part of this was due to a feeling that the federal government was not active enough in protecting the border. Part was due to political dissatisfaction. It was felt that the rights of suffrage were too much re- stricted, and that through the appointment of sheriffs the governor had too much influence in elections. Numerous petitions to Congress indicate this sentiment."" January 1, 1812, Jennings presented a petition drawn by the General Assembly asking that Indiana be made a State. January 13, the Speaker laid before Congress a pro- test against the above petition signed by James Dill and Peter Jones, members of the House of Representatives of Indiana Territory. March 31 Jennings reported favorably on the petition, and offered a resolution that Indiana be admitted as soon as a census should show it to have a popu- lation of 35,000.*' Again, on February 1, 1815, Jennings presented a petition from inhabitants of Indiana Territory asking admission. The request was laid on the table with- out discussion. The question, however, was discussed throughout In- 4 The .Journals of the General Assembly for 1810 and 1811 are in the Vincenues Western Sun. Those of 1813 are in the Seci'etary of State's office, in manuscript form; that of the House in the hand of William Hendricks; that of the Council in the hand of Benjamin Parke. Danger of Vincennes being captured by the Indians may have hastened the removal of the capital. Cf. Waldo Mitchell, "Growth of Indiana. 1812-1820," in Indiana Magazitie of History, December, ini4. The re- moval took place soon after the disaster on the river Raisin. •""' See especially report by Jennings, Annuls TiceJfth Cony.. 1284. ^Annals, Twelfth Cong., 607 and 749. (15) 214 HISTORY OF INDIANA diana during the ensuing summer. Money was piling up in the land offices at Vincennes and especially at Jefferson- ville. A continuous fleet of boats floated down the Ohio from Pittsburg, a goodly number of which tied up on the Indiana bank of the river, or else were poled up its tribu- tary streams. Every one felt that there must be near the necessary 60,000 population, the minimum requirement for a State government under the Ordinance of 1787. The newspapers at Vincennes, Corydon, Lexington and Madi- son were full of advertisements of new towns being laid out. Settlements were forming right up to the Indian Boundary all the way across the State and the ubiquitous squatters were crossing over by hundreds. The White- water Valley, it was thought, had 20,000 settlers; Clark and Washington counties had at least 15,000; Harrison had upwards of 6,000; while not less than 20,000 lived on the Wabash or the lower course of White river. The Western Eagle, of Lexington, from statistics in eight coun- ties and estimates in six others, gave the total population, November, 1815, as 68,084." The General Assembly that met December 4-28, 1815. included many of the best men in the territory. It lost no time in framing a petition for Statehood. This memorial appeared in Niles' Register, December 14, but was not pre- sented in the House of Representatives till December 28, 1815, and in the Senate till January 2, 1816. The memorial was signed by Dennis Pennington, of Corydon, Speaker, and by David Robb, of Princeton, president of the Council. After reciting that the territory had reached that stage of growth at which, by the terms of the Ordinance of 1787, it was entitled to a State government, the memorialists asked for an election on the first Monday of May to elect delegates to a constitutional convention which might de- termine whether it was expedient to form a State constitu- tion. The memorialists also asked for seven per cent of the land sales for State use, for a congressional township as an endowment for a State University, for an academy, for the "' Quoted in Niles' Register, Noveiuber 4 and 11. 1815. FROM TERRITORY TO STATE 215 coal mines and salt licks, and finally for a donation six miles square on which to locate a State capital. The memorial was referred to a committee, of which Jonathan Jennings was chairman. This committee, through its chairman, reported by bill January 5, 1816. In the Annals there is included in Jennings' report a letter from William Hendricks, dated February 24, 1816, giving the voters of the State as 12,112 and the total population 63,897.^ This census had been taken by the listers of the various counties and certified by the county clerk of the General Assembly December 4, 1815. The vote on the admission of Indiana in the House of Representatives stood 108 yeas, 3 nays. The bill was re- ported to the Senate March 30. April 2 it was referred to the same committee that had in charge the enabling bill for the territory of Mississippi. At this time Senator David Daggett, of Connecticut, asked that the committee ascer- tain the number of free inhabitants in each of the terri- tories. April 3 the bill for the admission of Indiana was taken from the special committee and given to a committee headed by Senator Jeremiah Morrow, of Ohio. The next day this committee reported favorably, Senator Morrow submitting at the time a census report on the population of the territory of Indiana. It was finally passed April 13. The next legislative day, Monday, April 15, the House con- curred in the Senate amendments and the bill went to the 8 Voters Population Clark County 1,387 7,150 Dearborn County 902 4,424 Franklin County 1,430 7,370 Gibson County 1,100 5,330 Harrison County 1,056 6,975 Jefferson County 874 4,270 Knox County 1,391 8,068 Periy County 350 1,720 Posey County 320 1,619 Switzerland County 377 1,832 Warrick County 280 1,415 Washington County 1,420 7,317 Wayne County 1,225 6,407 Total 12,112 63,897 216 HISTORY OF INDIANA President, by whom it was approved April 19. It is inter- esting to note how closely the fate of this bill was linked with that for the admission of Mississippi. The two were passed by the House at the same sitting and without inter- vening business. There were only three opposing votes in the House, Goldsborough, of Maryland, Lewis and Ran- dolph of Virginia, on the bill to admit Indiana and 53 on that to enable Mississippi. There was no division in the Senate. Congress left the duty of naming the new State to its inhabitants. Its boundaries were laid down as they now are, the only change from the territorial boundary being the additions of a strip ten miles wide across the northern border, and some small areas east of the Wabash between Vincennes and Terre Haute. The act set Monday, May 13, as the day for an election of delegates to a constitutional convention. The apportion- ment of delegates was the same as that asked for in the petition.'-^ The qualifications for voting were legal age, payment of taxes, and the usual residence restrictions. No property qualification was required. Otherwise the elec- tion was held as ordinary elections for members of the House of Representatives. The members thus elected were to convene at Corydon Monday, June 10, and, if deemed expedient, form a con- stitution, or order a new election of delegates. The only restriction on the work of the convention was that the new constitution should be republican and exclude slavery, the restriction laid down in the federal constitution and in the Ordinance of 1787. Besides the above. Congress made five donations to the 9 The appoi'tioument was as folloAvs: Clark n Perry 1 Dearborn 3 Posey 1 Franklin 5 Switzerland 1 Gibson 4 Warrick 1 Harrison 5 Washington 5 .Tefiferson 3 Wayne 4 Knox 5 Total 43 FROM TERRITORY TO STATE 217 prospective State, conditioned on their acceptance by the convention : The first was the donation of section sixteen of the public land out of every congressional township for the use of public schools. The second was the donation of all the salt springs in the territory to and for the use of the people. The third was the donation of five per cent of the net proceeds of the land sales in the territory, three per cent to be used by the General Assembly for opening roads in the State, and two per cent by the federal government to build roads to the State. The fourth was a donation of one entire township for the use of a seminary of learning — the State University grant. The fifth was a donation of four sections of land as a site for a State capital. i° § 41 The Constitutional Convention of 1816 An announcement of the passage of the Enabling Act reached Vincennes in time to be published in the Western Sun, May 3. The election of delegates was set for May 13, leaving only ten days intervening, time for only one issue of the paper. The Western Sun rightly criticised Jennings for the haste. ^^ An explanation, favorable to Jennings, was that when the bill was drawn in December it was thought it would pass early in January, thus giving the voters of Indiana at least three months for the can- vass. The delay was caused largely by the opposition to the Mississippi bill. The editor of the Western Sun placed several men in nomination, but frankly added that he had not seen any of them and did not know if any of them would serve. Very little evidence has come down to us concerning this election. If there was any concerted action, any or- ganization, any definite issue before the people, all trace of it has disappeared. The men selected were representa- tive of the best talent in the State. The previous General ^'0 Annals, 14 Congress, 1.S41 ; Dunn. Infliana, 417; Dillon, History of Indiana, 554; Vincennes Western Sun, under pi-oper .cl:(te: Statutes at Large, 1816, Scss. 1, ch. 57. 11 Western Sun, May 3, 1S16. 218 HISTORY OF INDIANA Assembly was represented in the convention by over half its members. Twenty-three of them subsequently served in the State Senate; seventeen served in the House of Repre- sentatives; Jonathan Jennings served two terms as gov- ernor; Jennings, James Noble and Robert Hanna became United States senators; Jennings and William Graham became representatives in Congress; Benjamin Parke, James Scott and John Johnson became distinguished judges, the former in the United States circuit court, the two latter in the State supreme court; Daniel C. Lane served seven years as State Treasurer; John Badolet was in charge of the land oifice at Vincennes; William Polke was Indian agent at Fort Wayne ; at least a dozen of them were preach- ers; a smaller number were lawyers. So far as the evi- dence at hand shows, there was not a bad man in the list. They were not only a creditable convention, but personally were creditable to the voters who chose them. It does not seem probable that even a majority of them could have been partisans to any man or party. Badolet was the Swiss companion of Albert Gallatin; John DePauw was the son of a companion of Lafayette; Hugh Cull was a Methodist circuit rider; Charles Polke was a Baptist preacher and the founder of Baptist churches, as were also Ezra Ferris and William Polke; Frederick Rappe was the adopted son of the founder of New Harmonie. William Hendricks, the first representative of the State in Congress, and its second governor, was the secretary of the convention. The convention was in session from Monday, June 10, to Saturday, June 29, eighteen working days. The journal of the convention gives only the most meager details. The work of forming a constitution was distributed to commit- tees. There was some discussion, no doubt, over the slav- ery and suffrage sections, but the Enabling Act left them no discretion in the former. The constitution was not submitted to the voters for ratification. The president of the convention, Jonathan Jennings, was directed to issue to the county sheriffs writs of an election to be held August 5, under the old election laws, for the choice of a governor, lieutenant governor, FROM TERRITORY TO STATE 219 members of the General Assembly, sheriffs and coroners. It was the harvest season of the year and many of the members were anxious to get home. The crowd of fifty men taxed heavily the tavern accommodations of the vil- lage of Corydon. There was every inducement for com- pleting the work as soon as possible. In this regard it stands in contrast to the convention of 1851, with its two thick volumes of talk. The two senators and the representatives appeared at the opening of Congress, December 2, when the Senate, by resolution December 6, and the House, by resolution intro- duced by William Henry Harrison, December 9, declared the State a member of the Union. ^ - As would be inferred from the character of the mem- bers of the convention and the brevity of the session, there was nothing novel in the constitution. The political theory of these men was somewhat more democratic than that advocated by Jefferson. The constitution as finally adopted was a judicious compound of the constitutions of Ohio, Kentucky, and the United States. The first article, which was a bill of rights, restated the fundamental maxims of English government in almost the exact words of the Ohio law. Article II, dealing with the separation of powers, which is an exact copy of article I of the Kentucky constitution, divided the powers into executive, legislative and judicial. There is only one different word — "Indiana" is used in place of "Kentucky." Article III, dealing with the legislative department, is a copy almost verbatim of the Ohio constitution. The date ^- AiiiKils, Foiiiiecnth Cong., Twentieth Session. No cletjiiled study of the roiivention of 1816 li:is ever been made. Dillon and Dunn give a fevr pjiges to a bare outline of its work as gleaned from the scant record of the "Journal." The "Journal" was kept by William Hendricks, the secretary. No record was kept of the discussions in committee. There is evidence that a great deal of the short sessions was occupied by dif- ferent members in laying political plans. The "Journal" has been recent- ly reprinted in the 1912 Indiana Bar Association Report. This report al.so contains an al>le article on the Convention of 1816, by W. W. Thorn- ton, 220 HISTORY OF INDIANA for State election is the first Monday of August, in prefer- ence to the Ohio date, which was on the second Tuesday of October. Representatives were to be chosen annually, as in Ohio, but senators were to serve three years, plainly a compromise between the two year term of Ohio and the four year term of Kentucky. The qualifications of repre- sentatives, 21 years of age, and senators, 25 years of age, were lower than in either State. Both had to be taxpayers, the same as in Ohio. The voting qualifications were expressed in the same words as in the Ohio law, the voter being required to be 21 years old, and one year a resident. Judged from our time, there were remarkably few offi- cers to be chosen at public election. They were the mem- bers of the General Assembly, governor, lieutenant gov- ernor, associate circuit judges, sheriffs and coroners; the coroner and lieutenant governor being merely emergency oflficers to fill possible vacancies. Only three offices were thus filled by popular election, legislator, governor and sheriflC. In harmony with the spirit of the times, nearly all power was placed in the hands of the General Assembly. The governor had only a suspensive veto, which could be overcome by a majority of each House. He appointed a few officers, principally judges of the supreme court, but always by and with the advice and approval of the Senate. All circuit judges, and the secretary, auditor and treasurer of State were chosen by the General Assembly. The most notable innovation in the Indiana constitu- tion was Article IX, dealing with the subject of education. It has been noted that all the material differences between the Indiana and other constitutions were in favor of a wider democracy. Ohio had taken a short, halting step in the direction of public education, but the Indiana conven- [/' tion is entitled to the distinction of having first recognized the governmental obligation of educating all its citizens. Of all the sections of the constitution the one requiring that the General Assembly provide by law for a general system FROM TERRITORY TO STATE 221 of education, ascending in a regular scale, from township schools to a State university, wherein tuition shall be gratis and equally open to all, was most democratic, and forward looking. It took a century to put this article into success- ful operation. 13 ^^ Journal of Constitutional Convention of 1816; Revised Latcs of In- diana, 1824; Ben Perley Poore, Constitutions and Charters; Laics of Indiana, 1817; Thorpe, Constitutions. CHAPTER X the government at corydon, 1816-1825 § 42 The New Constitution in Operation The summer of 1816 was a busy time with the voters and politicians of Indiana. The news of the passing of the Enabling Act reached the territory about May 1. The elec- tion of delegates to the constitutional convention was held May 13. The convention sat from the 10th to the 29th of June. The regular State and county election was held August 5, and the First General Assembly convened at Corydon November 4, 1816. Jonathan Jennings was the central figure in all this activity. He had been the delegate in Congress in charge of the Enabling Act; he was a dele- gate in the constitutional convention ; presided over its de- liberations; as its president it became his duty to issue writs of election and put the constitution into active opera- tion ; and in the campaign he was the leading candidate. The election of August 5, 1816, was warmly contested in some parts of the State. The Vincennes Western Sun, July 20, has ten columns devoted to letters of candidates. These letters make rather dull reading at present. There was no important issue before the people. All voters be- longed to the Republican Party and supported Monroe. An echo of the old-time struggle between the Wabash and Ohio settlements appeared in the campaign between Jennings and Governor Thomas Posey. That there was some spirit in this contest is shown by the number of votes cast. Jen- nings received 5,211 to 3,934 for Posey, — a total of 9,145 votes out of a possible 12,112 shown in the enumeration less than a year previous. In the race for lieutenant gov- ernor only 7,474 votes were cast, of which Christopher Har- THE GOVERNMENT AT CORYDON 223 rison, of Salem, received 6,570. In the race for Congress, William Hendricks defeated Allen D. Thoih, receiver of public money at Jeffersonville, and George R. C. Sullivan, an attorney of Vincennes, by decisive majorities. Sullivan withdrew from the race two days before the election, in the hope of throwing his support to Thom, but the announce- ment did not reach most of the counties till after the elec- tion. The first session of the General Assembly met at Cory- don November 4, 181G, and remained in session till January 3, 1817. It was fortunate for the new State that so many good men were returned to the First Session, for the con- stitution had left the organization of the State government very largely in the hands of the General Assembly. No State or local officers were elected by the people except the governor and sheriff and a deputy for each in case of emer- gency. By far the larger number of officers had to be pro- vided by the General Assembly. How much of its work was of this nature will be shown by a brief review. On the first day, November 4, the Houses organized, on the second, they met in joint session and canvassed the votes for governor and lieutenant gov- ernor, declaring Jennings and Harrison elected. On No- vember 8 the Houses again met together and chose James Noble and Waller Taylor to represent the State in the United States Senate. November 16 William H. Lilly was elected auditor of State, and Daniel C. Lane treasurer of State. There was some tendency shown to parcel out the offices among the members but this was soon stopped by a vote of the House, which expressed it as the belief of that body that it would be a violation of the constitution to elect one of its own members to a State office. Robert A. New was chosen as secretary of State. November 14 the Houses, again in joint session, chose Jesse L. Holman, Thomas H. Blake and Joseph Bartholomew to cast the vote of the State for James Monroe for President. December 20, in joint session, the General Assembly chose Benjamin Parke judge of the first circuit court, David Raymond, judge of the sec- ond, and John Test judge of the third. Not only was it 224 HISTORY OF INDIANA necessary to elect these officers but to outline and define the work of the various offices. The constitution recognized the existence of township government and assumed that it would continue. In one section it provided that a competent number of justices be elected by the qualified electors for a term of five years. ^ In another place it provided that all town and to^vnship officers be appointed in such manner as shall be directed by law.'- It was made the duty of the board of commissioners of the county to divide each county into a suitable number of townships and order an election to be held to choose jus- tices, not to exceed three, for each township. These jus- tices were to be commissioned by the governor. At the sug- gestion of the board of commissioners the sheriff was authorized to appoint an election inspector for each town- ship, who might, if he thought necessary, divide the town- ship into voting precincts.-' The constable of the township was made the ministerial officer of the justice's court. He was appointed annually by the county board. The justices had county-wide juris- diction over petty crimes and misdemeanors, and township- wide jurisdiction over civil cases involving not over fifty dollars.^ The board of county commissioners was directed to ap- point a necessary number of freeholders in each town- ship to supervise the laying out and repairing of the high- ways. For the road-working every male person between the ages of eighteen and fifty was liable for not more than six days' work.'' The commissioners were also empowered to appoint a lister in each township to do the work now done by the township assessor.'' Then, for fear the legisla- tors had left out some detail in the scheme of local govern- 1 Constitution, Art. V. Sec. V2. 2 Constitution, Art. XI, Sec. 15. ^ Laws of Indiana, 1817, eh. 11. ^ Latcs of Indiana. 1817, ch. 4. o Laws of Indiana, 1817, ch. A'lIT. 6 Laws of Indiana, 1817, ch. XIX. THE GOVERNMENT AT CORYDON 225 ment, the commissioners were authorized to do and transact any and all county business not provided for." An unforeseen business soon developed in the case of poor relief. A law of the next General Assembly directed the county commissioners to appoint two overseers of the poor in every township, whose duty it should be to look after the worthy paupers. This was done by the overseers by auctioning off each individual pauper to the lowest bid- der, that is, to the person who would care for him for the smallest amount. Children of the poor and orphans were bound out as apprentices, boys until twenty-one years of age, girls until eighteen. Vagrants, so decreed by the court, were sold out to the highest bidder, the proceeds of his work, if any, going to those dependent upon him, the balance going to the vagrant after he had served out his nine months' indenture. The constitution dealt briefly with the county: Article XI, section ten, provided that a recorder might be elected for each county if the circuit court clerk was unable to do the work ; Article XII, section eight, provided for the elec- tion of a sheriff and coroner for each county. The General Assembly was given power to create and organize counties but no specific form of county organization was laid down. The First General Assembly constructed a simple sys- tem of commissioner government for the county. The form was almost the same as that of the present. There were three commissioners chosen for three year terms, one retir- ing each year. The circuit court clerk was clerk of the board, a duty now performed by the county auditor. The sheriff was, and still is, the ministerial officer of the board. The commissioners had control over the county affairs, levying county taxes and paying out the county money, con- trolling county roads and attending to and owning county property.'' The board was authorized to appoint a county treasurer, to receive, care for, and pay out on order, all county reve- nues, procure and keep correct a set of legal weights and ■J" Laii-s of Indiana, 1817, ch. XXVII. 8 Laws of Indiana, 1817, eh. XV. 226 HISTORY OF INDIANA measures, appoint fence viewers, pound keepers, viewers to lay out new roads, select grand and petit jurors, appoint superintendents of school sections, election inspectors, poor overseers, and later to establish ferries and taverns.'^ It was no easy office in a new country. The strongest department of our early territorial and State government was the judiciary. During the territorial era, however, the system had become unduly complicated, and in one or two particulars, was not working well. There had been disclosed a ridiculous inconsistency in the appel- late court. The old territorial judges, three in number, went on circuit, and as circuit judges they often sat to- gether. On appeal, although all three might sit together, one was a quorum and thus one might overrule a decision given on circuit by all three; or one as supreme judge might overrule himself as a circuit judge; or, a lawyer might appeal a case and be sustained by one judge and the next year be reversed on the identical question by the other judge. The Territorial General Assembly had tried to remedy this, and, in the constitution, it was effectually cured by giving the supreme court appellate jurisdiction only and re- quiring two of the three justices to concur in all decisions. They were not allowed to hold circuit court and hence would be under no necessity of overruling themselves. The State was divided into three circuits, in each of which a circuit court was organized. This court consisted of three judges, a president judge, appointed by the Gen- eral Assembly, and two associate justices, elected by the voters of the county. It was a strange mixture of State and local government. Thus the First Circuit, composed of Knox, Gibson, Warrick, Posey, Perry, Pike and Daviess counties, had one president judge, Benjamin Parke, and fourteen associate justices, two for each county. The presi- dent judge was usually a skilled lawyer, but the associates more often knew little of the law. They were rather se- lected for their general worth and standing in the com- 9 Laifs of Indiana, 1S17, ch. XVII. THE GOVERNMENT AT CORYDON 227 munity. They were regarded as the leading men of the county and were often politicians. Below the circuit courts was an army of justices of the peace, as stated under "Township Government." The sys- tem was given a modern appearance by lopping off all ex- traordinary tribunals of the common law, such as quarter sessions, chancery, probate, and other special courts. In place of these the circuit courts were endowed with com- mon law and equity powers. A beginning was made also in simplifying the pleadings, though many of the ludicrous old writs of English common law survived to the great joy of the special pleader at the bar. The work of the conven- tion and of the First General Assembly indicate the pres- ence in these bodies of good lawyers. Chief of these, no doubt, were Isaac Blackford, Benjamin Parke, James Scott, John Johnson and Joseph Holman. The organization of the courts was carried still farther by the Second General Assembly, which not only laid down the main lines of the civil code of the State as it exists to- day, but added a criminal code which received few changes except in the manner of punishment until after 1850.1^ The whipping post, as a means of punishment, still dis- graced the State, though the substitution of fines and im- prisonment was noticeable in the code of 1818.^^ All bar- barous punishments disappeared in the code of 1824. i- ^(^ Laws of ImUana. 1818, ch. I-XIII inclusive. iiGompiire article by Judge D. D. P.nnta. IniUnwi Mdc/dzine of His- tory, December ]91o. 234. 12 Vincennes CenUnel May 6. 1820: '"On Thursday last the minds of our citizens were shocked by the shameful spectacle of a fellow citizen tied to a sign post and flogged lilve a dog under the sentence of the circuit court now sitting in our town. He was found guilty of a petty species of that Siime crime for wliich so many heroes and statesmen have been celebrated and for which their names have been given to posterity. The sight was truly disgusting and it was evident that the manly mind of the otiicer who executed the sentence revolted at the performance of that odious duty. The criminal code of Indiana is a disgrace to civilization and it ill becomes our lawyers to boast of their refinement, while they sanction this species of degrading brutality, or to laud their purgation from British brutality, while they hariior this relic of its foulest barbarism. Corporal punishments are worse than useless; for nine times out of ten they are fatal to the mind of the victim — he is lost to society — he sinks under a sense of shame; or is sensitive and 228 HISTORY OF INDIANA In the State government the General Assembly was all- powerful. Many functions now performed by other agents were then retained as the duties of the General Assembly. It laid down new roads and streets and vacated old ones ; it chartered all municipal and private corporations from a county government to a county library; it licensed ferries and taverns, fixing rates of service in either case ; it elected United States senators and impeached squires; it char- tered a State bank, and granted divorces. The General Assembly met annually and its meeting constituted the chief political event in the year's history. The politicians of the State gathered to its meetings, the newspapers of the State burdened themselves, to the ex- clusion of all other news, with the minute details of the Legislative journals. The electioneering of candidates for the General Assembly was never ended. The candidates were present at the log-rolling in the spring and at the harvest in the summer; at the huskings in the fall they talked with their constituents about what the General As- sembly should do when it met; on muster days the candi- dates and more important politicians, usually under the im- posing title of "jinerall," reviewed the militia or led in the maneuvers. The executive department was reduced to a minimum. The governor, drawing the highest salary in the State, $1,000 per year, could be absent from his post for weeks at a time. The secretary of state, auditor of state, treasurer of state, with duties similar to those pertaining to their offices at present, were small clerks drawing salaries of $400 each annually. The supreme and circuit judges drew $700 per year, while members of the General Assembly were paid $2 per day. § 43 Indians When Indiana was admitted into the Union the Indians still had a claim on about two-thirds of its soil. The In- revengeful : the petty felon becomes the lui nleiied ruffi.-ni. If guilty lie is then desi)er;ite, if innocent the scars on his shoulders keep knockinir at his heart and calling for satisfaction in a voice that is never mistaken or unheeded." THE GOVERNMENT AT CORYDON 229 dian Boundary line extended from a point on the west boundary of the State in Vermiiiion county, passing near Montezuma, in Parke county; Gosport, in Owen county; to Driftwood river, a few miles east of Brownstown. This was the famous "ten o'clock" line. From Brownstown the boundary led in a broken line northeast to Greenville, Ohio. During the summer of 1816 Benjamin Parke met the Weas and Kickapoos in council at Fort Harrison. They ceded a small strip of land on Vermillion river. The In- dians seemed in an accommodating mood and the agent was hopeful that they would consent to go beyond the Missis- sippi.^^ Later in the year 1816 ex-Governor Posey, Judge Parke and a man named Sharpe were commissioned to hold a council with the Miamis, Pottawattomies and Delav/ares. Nothing was accomplished at this time. Two years later Governor Jennings, Benjamin Parke, then federal judge for the district of Indiana, and Gen. Lewis Cass, governor of Michigan, met the tribes at St. Mary's, Ohio, and suc- ceeded in purchasing nearly all the land south of the Wa- bash. The Delawares agreed to take a grant of land be- yond the Mississippi, and the Weas, Kickapoos, Pottawat- tomies and Miamis, all having claims on the ceded terri- tory, agreed to withdraw to the north of the Wabash. This ceded land was commonly known in Indiana as the "New Purchase." Three years were given the Delawares in which to gather up their property and leave the State. In the fall of 1820 the remnant of this once powerful tribe, whose ancestors had received Henry Hudson, on the Hudson, and William Penn, on the Delaware, took up their western march, the disheartened train passing Kaskaskia about the middle of October.'^ In September, 1820, Judge Parke concluded negotiations by which the Kickapoos also abandoned the State, thus op- ening up the Wabash country as far north as the present site of Lafayette. ^^ American State Papers; [lulian Affairs, II. 91; United States Stat- utes at Large, VII, 145. 14 Vineeunes Centinel, November 4, 1820. (16) 230 HISTORY OF INDIANA The government had early recognized its obligations to aid the Indians, but though Congress had appropriated money liberally for the purpose, no lasting benefit had de- rived to the Indians. It was found impossible to regulate the trade between the white and red men so that the latter were treated fairly. In despair of regulating the inde- pendent traders by means of licenses and police, the gov- ernment, in 179G, had taken the business into its own hands. Agents for the various tribes were appointed and factories established where the Indians might buy and sell at a fair and uniform price. In 1806 a superintendent of the Indian trade was ap- pointed. This system was considered somewhat better than the old, but the condition of the Indians was little improved. The government factors were forbidden to sell whiskey to the natives, but unprincipled traders, most of them crimi- nal outcasts from the east, swarmed into the Indian coun- try, furnishing liquor to all V\^ho had anything to give in return, denouncing the government agents as robbers, and inciting the Indians to all kinds of deeds of violence on one another or to depredations on the settlers. The evidence is conclusive that for every Indian killed in war ten were killed in drunken brawls. The squaws were neglected and the papooses frozen and starved, that meat and furs might be carried to the nearest trading post and bartered for whiskey.^"' The condition of the Indians excited pity among most of the pioneers. Bands of dejected, hopeless, Indian va- grants from the Indian towns often visited the settlements, usually begging food or clothes. Many of the churches at- tempted to do something for them. On March 26, 1817, Isaac McCoy, a Baptist preacher of the Maria Creek Church, Knox county, wrote to the board of managers of the Baptist Missionary Convention of the United States, asking service, under its direction, among the pioneers beyond the Mississippi. Instead of sending him beyond the Mississippi the board sent him as a mis- sionary among the Wabash Indians of Indiana. 15 American State Papers, Indian Affairs. 11, 70. THE GOVERNMENT AT CORYDON 231 Mr. McCoy, his wife, and their seven small children, established a mission school in a hut in the forests of what is now Parke county. Gen. Thomas Posey, United States agent for the Weas, Miamis and Kickapoos, assisted. Mc- Coy accompanied the traders, who went early in 1818, to deliver the annuities of the government. The goods were placed on the ground and two Indians chosen to divide them. They drew cuts for first choice and then proceeded, taking piece about, until all articles were appropriated. The trader put whatever value he saw fit on the goods. The mission school was twenty miles from the nearest white settlement. Here, in a log hut, were gathered a dozen or so Indian children, ranging in age from five to twelve years. Mrs. McCoy took care of them just as she did her own children. All ate at the same table and slept in the same room with the missionary and his family. The larger number of the children were half breeds, children of white traders and Indian squaws. December 18, 1818, McCoy set off from his mission home on a tour of inspection. His journey led him across the State to Fort Wayne. In the neighborhood of the future cities of Crawfordsville and Thorntown the Indian huts were all abandoned, the Indians being gone on their hunt- ing trip. However, he found four French traders on that part of his journey. At the Delaware towns in Hamilton county he found a trader named Connor. Bending his course to the southeast, McCoy struck the Quaker Settlements in Wayne county. On the 15th, he reached the Indian Agency at Fort Wayne, kept by John Johnson. Mr. McCoy returned through the Delaware coun- try, visiting Captain Anderson at Andersontown. The cap- tain lived in some style. He had fifteen squaws hauling wood for him. They procured the wood at a distance of half a mile, tied it with thongs in large bundles, bound it on their backs and carried it to the chief's hut. At the close of the day's work the old squaws were courteously thanked and given a good feed. Most of the Delawares at this time lived in log huts, had cleared land, and had 232 HISTORY OF INDIANA planted some fruit trees. They were making progress, but the "New Purchase" treaty had just been consummated and all were preparing to leave for the west, broken- hearted. The prevailing tone of McCoy's picture of these sav- ages is one of unmitigated squalor and debauchery that prevailed everywhere on account of the too frequent use of liquor by the unfortunate tribesmen. On one occasion a squaw was observed in a swamp digging roots for her chil- dren's breakfast. The weather was almost freezing cold, but she stood barefoot in the mud and water half knee deep. Strapped on her back, she carried a papoose not more than a few months old. On another occasion they came upon a squaw burying her young babe. The ground was frozen and she had cut a deep notch with a hatchet in a fallen tree. In this hole she placed the babe and laid some large pieces of wood over the top to keep the wild animals away. In 1820 the McCoys moved their mission to Fort Wayne. The goods and ten or twelve Indian children were placed in a small boat at Fort Harrison and poled up the Wabash, while the McCoys, husband, wife and their own children, together with fifteen head of cattle, forty-three hogs, two hired men and a guide, set out by a bridle path. It rained almost every day. The party slept on the bare ground, fortunate if they could find enough dry ground on which to sleep. The Indians along the route were drunk, as usual, having just returned from their winter's hunt. At the crossing of the Mississinewa the Indians were especially troublesome. One drunken wretch made an effort to mur- der McCoy. Another enjoyed himself by throwing a half rotten dog on Mrs. McCoy and the children. The trip was made, however, without mishap. A prosperous mission was built up. Later, October, 1822, the McCoys moved the mission to Niles, Michigan, and when the Indians were transported beyond the Mississippi the McCoys went along, ^s ic//Ks-/ory of the Baptinl Indian Missions. Isnac McCoy. Washing- THE GOVERNMENT AT CORYDON 233 § 44 The First State Bank and the Ohio Falls Canals There was very little money, either specie or paper, in Indiana before the State was admitted into the Union in 1816. The period just preceding 1816 was the worst in our history for "wildcat" banks. The charter of the First United States Bank expired in 1811, and the Second was not chartered until 1816, and during that time the "wild- cat" banks flourished. A "wildcat" bank was a very simple affair. In order to start a bank, the banker had only to have a supply of notes engraved and then open his bank in some convenient place. These banks, as a rule, received no deposits. They were open one day in the week or preferably two half days. The banker used every means to get his notes in cir- culation, frequently selling or loaning them at half their face value. If business prospered he would remain and redeem his notes; if not, he packed his grip with the re- maining notes and sought a more favorable field. Banks like this were established in territorial times at Brook- ville, Lexington and New Harmony. There was a demand, however, for more substantial banks ; and in answer to this the territorial legislature, sit- ting in Corydon in 1814, chartered two banks. One of them was to be located at Vincennes and the other at Madison. The ofllicers of the land ofiice at Vincennes were behind the former, and John Paul, founder of Madison and a hero of the George Rogers Clark campaign, was behind the latter. The charters, which were identical, were to run twenty years, and it was provided that all notes issued should be paid in hard money. The capital stock of the Madison bank was to be $750,000; that of Vincennes, at first $750,000, was later raised to $1,500,000. The Madison Bank, called the Farmers and Mechanics', was promptly organized by ton 1840; Indiana Magazine of Histoiy, March, 1914; American State Papers, Indian Affairs, II, 277; Vincennes Sun, September 1, 1821. The Moravian missionaries had established a station at Anderson- town on White riA'er and were attempting to teach the arts of peaceful life to the Indians. See J. P. Dunn, in Indiana Magazine of History, IX, 73; also Dawson, Life of Harrison, II, This station lasted from 1801 to 1806. 234 HISTORY OF INDIANA John Paul, John Ritchie, Christopher Harrison, Henry Ris- tine, N. Hurst and D. Blakmore. This bank proceeded to make itself useful at once by redeeming the shin-plasters issued by the local merchants. It was the custom of the merchants to keep on hand a large amount of paper money, printed by themselves, in denominations of 6i/4, 121/2, 25, and 50 cents. There being no coin in circulation, the store- keepers handed this out in change. This the bank re- deemed in the currency of the Commonwealth Bank of Ken- tucky, when presented in amounts of one dollar or more. The notes of the Madison Bank were received at the land office at Brookville in payment for land until the Second United States Bank began its war on all private banks. During this time the Madison Bank held the enviable repu- tation of having furnished land office money to the settlers in exchange for other money not receivable at the land of- fice without any cost to the settlers. At the same time the receiver at the land office kept his money on deposit with the bank. The Madison Bank dis- charged all its obligations punctually, but when Langdon Cheeves became president of the Second United States Bank he refused to have any dealings with local banks in Tennes- see, Indiana or Illinois. A reason for this action may be that the States named had refused to allow branches of the United States Bank established in them. The order of Mr. Cheeves broke practically every bank in the States named. The Farmers and Mechanics' paid all its obligations, grad- ually retired all its currency, and was honorably closed by John Lanier and Milton Stapp. The Vincennes Bank was not so successful. Its charter was confirmed by the State constitution and it was adopted as a State Bank with branches. The intention of the in- corporators was to acquire a complete monopoly of the banking business of the State. A glance at the location of the branches will show that the business was well planned. The first branch was to be organized at Centerville ; the second at Brookville ; the third at Lawrenceburg ; the fourth at Vevay ; the fifth at Madison ; the sixth at Jeff ersonville ; the seventh at Brownstown ; the eighth at Paoli ; the ninth THE GOVERNMENT AT CORYDON 235 at Salem; the tenth at Corydon; the eleventh at Troy; the twelfth at Darlington; the thirteenth at some point in Posey county ; the fourteenth at some point in Gibson coun- ty, and the parent bank was to be at Vincennes. Each branch was to serve three counties, and the stock was reserved for inhabitants of these counties except that the State reserved the right to subscribe for $375,000 worth. This was too much. There were only about 75,000 persons in the State. It would have required a subscription of about $30 per capita to organize the banks provided for by these laws. There was no money in the country and it was soon ascertained that all the branches could not be or- ganized. Three branches were finally opened — at Brook- ville, Vevay and Corydon. These banks might have served a useful purpose, but before they got fairly on their feet they were caught in the hard times of 1818 and 1819 and ruined. The parent bank had backed a large industrial company at Vincennes. When this establishment was destroyed by fire, the bank lost $91,000. A large part of the business of the bank was to furnish money for the buyers of public lands. Under the ruling of Cheeves the bank notes were no longer receivable at the land office. The bank failed with $168,453 of United States money on deposit. This was later made good by the stockholders. By a law the State taxes were receivable in the notes of the bank. The State had borrowed $20,000 from the bank for which the bank held State bonds. These bonds had been turned over to the United States treasury as part payment on that debt. The State treasurer, Lane, at the direction of Governor Jennings, took $20,000 of the bank's own notes and proceeded over to Vincennes to redeem the State bonds. The cashier refused to receive the notes, but did not tell Mr. Lane that the Secretary of the Treasury of the United States held the State bonds. This fact, how- ever, was soon learned, and a spirited correspondence be- tween the governor and the secretary resulted. The mat- 236 HISTORY OF INDIANA ter was amicably settled by Senator James Noble, who took the matter in charge. i' The story of the Ohio Falls Canal takes us back into the territorial days of Indiana J "^ The portage at Louisville had been a bugbear to navigation since the first settlements along the upper Oiiio. The greatest demand for a canal came from Cincinnati, and the legislature of Ohio manifest- ed more concern in its building than that of either Indiana or Kentucky. The earliest attempt by Indiana people was about 1805, when a company, composed largely of Clark county citizens, subscribed $120,000. Rivermen seemed willing to pay a large toll rather than unload their boats or risk running the falls. One of the first acts signed by Jonathan Jennings, the first governor of Indiana, was an act to incorporate "The Ohio Canal Company." The incorporation name was John Bigelow & Company, capital stock 20,000 shares of $50 each, or a total of $1,000,000. Much of the capital was ex- pected from Madison and Cincinnati. The directors in- cluded some of the most prominent early settlers of Clark county. The long law of twenty-three sections shows much careful thought and argues that its framers expected soon to see the work done. The power of eminent domain was conferred, both for right of way and for building material. The company might double its capital if necessary. Its books were to be opened to the inspection of the General Assembly or of its agents. The canal was to become the property of the State in 1858. No tax was required of the corporation until its canal was complete. The canal was to be cut on the Indiana side. The act is an evidence of the aspirations of the two young Hoosier cities. The charter of 1816, how^ever, not being liberal enough in its provisions to suit foreigners, the money for the canal was not forthcoming. Governor Jennings, in his message December 2, 1818, recommended that something be done to I'Lognu Esarey, State B Laws of Indiana, 1817. 21 Western, Sun, Janu.iry 14, 1827. For a complete account of the canal see Logan Esarey, Internal Improvements in Early Indiana, 65 seq. 238 . HISTORY OF INDIANA central part of the State was claimed by Indians. A treaty was accordingly made with the Indians in 1818, by which the heart of the State was opened up for settlement. Governor Jennings in his message of 1819, called the attention of the General Assembly to "The New Purchase," and advised that body that it was time to appoint a com- mission to select a site for a State capital. The House of Representatives at once took up the matter. By an act signed January 11, 1820, a commission of ten men was chosen. -- March 22, Governor Jennings summoned these commis- sioners to meet at the house of William Connor on the west fork of White river. The time set for the meeting was Monday, May 22. The commissioners met according to notice and spent the time till June 7 examining White river and the adjacent country. On the latter date they met at the mouth of Fall creek and decided on the location of the capital. All the members signed this petition except Wil- liam Prince. The report was duly received by Governor Jennings, who transmitted it to the General Assembly. The legisla- ture ratified the selection, and on the same day — January 6 — appointed another commission to lay off the town. The latter commission consisted of Christopher Harrison, James Jones, and Samuel Booker. The first-named was the only active member. Alexander Ralston and Elias Fordham did the survey- ing. The town was soon laid off with the "circle" as the center. The wide streets and radiating avenues are due to the planning of these eastern men, who had seen a plat of the national capital. Gen. John Carr was agent for the new town and conducted the first land sale, beginning Oc- tober 28, 1821, and lasting one week. About 300 lots were sold for about $35,000. 22 These men were George Hunt of WajTie county, John Connor of Fayette, Stephen Ludlow of Dearborn, .John Gilliland of Switzerhind. Joseph Bartholomew of Clark, John Tipton of Harrison. Jesse B. Dur- ham of Jaclvson. Fred Rapp of Posey, William Prince of Gibson, and Thomas Emison of Knox. Their official report is in the office of the secretary of state at Indianapolis. THE GOVERNMENT AT CORYDON 239 The same act that appointed the commission to lay off the town also provided a name for it. Nothing came up during that session of the General Assembly that provoked such acrimonious debate and such merriment as naming the new capital. A strong effort was made to name the new town Tecumseh. Some of the old Indian fighters, as Marston Clark of Salem, urged that name. The name "In- dianapolis" is said to have been suggested by Jeremiah Sul- livan of Madison, and accepted as a compromise. § 46 Settlement of the New Purchase The period from 1816 to 1825 was one of unprecedented immigration to Indiana. The settlers crowded up the south-flowing streams beyond the center of the State. At the close of the period the number of counties had increased to fifty-two.-^ Almost all the territory south of the Wa- bash had been organized and the line of settlement was well to the north of the present line of the National Road. The latter had not yet been opened and practically all the set- tlers came by way of, or across the Ohio river. James W. Jones, Robert M. Evans, and Hugh McGary advertised a sale of lots for Evansville, June 20 and 21, 1817.-^ They claimed for it the best location on the north bank of the Ohio. Good mill-sites on Pigeon creek could be had, and the surrounding country was producing heavy crops of corn, wheat, hemp, and tobacco. A week previous, John Allen had advertised a sale of lots for Washington, the county seat of the new county of Daviess. The agent pointed out the advantage of its loca- tion at the forks of White river on the main State road from Vincennes to the Falls. It adjoined Liverpool, a vil- lage that had been settled seven years, having been used as a fort in the last war, and had 300 population. The sale of lots was to commence June 9.-^ During this same time, 1817, the pioneers had pushed on up the Wabash and founded the town of Terre Haute. 23 B. V. Shockley, iu Indiana Magazine of History, March, 1914. 24: Western Sun, April 19, 1817. 25 Western Sun, April 12, 1817. 240 HISTORY OF INDIANA The soldiers from Fort Harrison had praised the country highly. Lots to the value of $21,000 were sold in one day.-^ During the next year, 1818, Joseph Taylor, Truman Blackman, and William Harris opened up a settlement ten miles above Fort Harrison. In the fall, September 1, they advertised a sale of lots in the town of Clinton.-' It was customary for these founders of cities to offer a public square free, and they usually stated that a lot would be given free to the first physician and to each of the first three or five carpenters who would put up houses. The proximity of the Indians now retarded the advance somewhat, but by 1824 a great many settlers had pushed beyond Clinton. On Monday, June 7, John Collett opened a sale of lots for the town of Newport, situated two miles from the Wabash and on the south side of the Little Ver- million. During these latter years many settlers had penetrated the upland vales of what is now Parke county. Rockville was selected as the county seat of the new county of Parke, and here Thomas Smith, the county agent, opened a sale of lots June 16, 1824.2s The picturesque hills and chasms of Pine creek had for many years been a favorite haunt of the Kickapoo Indians. Traders had resided in the vicinity for an unknown period. Among the first permanent settlers who located in the neigh- borhood were Daniel Stump and George Hollingsworth, who advertised a sale of lots for the newly-laid town of Attica just across the Wabash from the mouth of Pine creek, May 30, 1825. It is significant of the newness of the settle- ments in this region that the nearest grist mill, until in 1824, was at Terre Haute.-'^ During the period 1816-1825 many new towns were laid out on the Ohio. These were shipping ports for the set- tlers many miles in the interior. Goods were hauled in many cases to and from Madison, New Albany, Leaven- '■^(^ Nile's Register. April 5. 1S17 ; Western Sun. May 0, 1818. 27 Western Sun, May 16. 1818. 28 Western Sun, May 22, 1824. ^^ Richmond Ledger, April 30, 1825. THE GOVERNMENT AT CORYDON 241 Tin: IrsUiANs — Fkom Stati: Gkoi.octcal Rki-okt, 18S2. 242 HISTORY OF INDIANA worth, Troy, Rockport, and Evansville, a distance of fifty miles. It is noticeable that all the young towns last-named were on deep north bends of the river. Sprinkiesburg Au- gust 6, Fredonia May 30, and Rockport June 30, were laid out on the river, in 1818, while farther back in Dubois county John Niblack had laid out a county seat called Por- tersville, on Driftwood, July 20.''*" Meanwhile the hillside glades and shady vales of Wash- ington, Orange, Lawrence, and Monroe counties were at- tracting an ever increasing stream of settlers from the South by way of the Falls at Louisville. The heavy oak and beech furnished ample mast to fatten thousands of swine, while cattle and even horses lived almost through the winter on the wild pea vines of the glades. Here, also, it was claimed, they were safe from the ague and malaria that infested the level lands. As soon as the War of 1812 was over the settlers be- gan to spread from their fortified home at Vallonia. Salem was laid out by Silas Wright in the spring of 1814, Orleans in the spring of 1816, Paoli by Jonathan Lindley in 1816, Palestine, first capital of Lawrence county, by Robert M. Carlton, in 1818,''i receiving $14,165 for 157 lots, at the same time letting a contract for the building of a "superb brick court house." Benjamin Parke, the county agent, sold the first lots of Bloomington, May 5, 1818."^- He added in his advertisement that Salt creek was navigable, that the town would be the county seat of Monroe county, the seat of the State University, and most likely the capital of the State. These pioneers from the South pushed on to White river at Spencer and Gosport the next year. By 1820 the squat- ters had reached Greencastie, and by 1824 they had pene- trated the "Big Flat Woods" as far as Crawfordsville, where General Ambrose Whitlock and Williamson Dunn 30 These are all taken from arlvertisements in tlie Wrsfeiii Sun. Cf. Waldo Mitchell, ''Growth of IndUiun. 1.S12-1S20." in Indiana Magazine of History, December. 191-1. 31 ^kladison Indiana Republican. October 17, 1S18. 32 Western Sun, May 16, 1818. THE GOVERNMENT AT CORYDON 243 had laid off the town of Crawfordsville on the bluffs of Sugar creek. Another branch of this stream of immigrants followed Driftwood from Vallonia and Brownstown, founding the Haw Patch, Jonesville, and Flat Rock settlements in Bar- tholomev/ county before 1820. Lots were sold in Columbus early in 1821. The settlements were reinforced by many pioneers vv^ho came across from the Whitewater country, following Whetzeli's Trace to Johnson county or coming from the Falls by the old Indian Trail. This latter divided at Driftwood, one route leading to the mouth of the Kentucky, the other to the Falls of the Ohio. Along these trails came Jacob Whetzell and John Vawter, the earliest settlers of Johnson county, the former from Franklin county and the latter from Madison. The pioneers of Marion, Johnson, and Bartholomew reached the Ohio river by three routes. Those from the Whitewater traded to Cincinnati, those from Jef- ferson county to Madison or New Albany, and those from the lower settlements to Maukport by way of Brownstovv^n, Salem, and Cory don. Ox teams were in general use for these long trips. •"^•'^ The settlements on the Whitewater were keeping pace with those farther to the west. Wayne was the most popu- lous county of the State. The first sale of lots in Richmond took place in August, 1816.^-1 By 1822 it had 410 inhabit- ants with factories, stores, and two newspaper presses. It was the seat of the annual meeting of the Quakers, who had built a house for that purpose one hundred feet long by sixty feet wide and two stories high.^^ 33 D. D. Baiit:i, A Historical ^keirh of Johnson County. 34 Sile's Register, February 9, 1S22. and April .3, 1S24. 35 Richmond Inteiliyencer, Auff. 2S, 1822. Western Sun, April 21, 1821. "Through the politeness of Colonel .John Vawtei', marshal for the State of Indiana, we have been favored with following census:" Clark 3709 Fayette 5950 Crawford 2583 Floyd 2776 Daviess 2432 Franklin 10763 Dearborn 11468 Gibson 3876 Delaware 3677 Harrison 7875 244 HISTORY OF INDIANA The sale of county lots at New Castle, seat of Henry county, took place August 5, 1822. Trading posts and squatters were stationed all along the upper course of White river as far as Muncietown, As noted in a previous chapter, Indianapolis was se- lected by the General Assembly to become the State capital. Gen. John Carr, the State Agent, opened the first sale of lots from the "Donation" October 8, 1821. There was at that time a considerable village with three taverns. Squat- ters had located in the neighborhood as early as 1820. The spring of 1820 saw a rush of settlers to the place.^" The Richmond Ledger, October 22, 1825, said the tide of immigration had never before set so hard toward Indi- ana. For days the main street (National Road) had been thronged with persons moving west, principally from Ohio. They appeared to be of the thrifty, well-to-do class, driv- ing large flocks of sheep and horned cattle. The Bloom- ington Gazette, October 8, 1825, stated that there was scarcely a day but throngs of movers passed through town on their way to White river and the Wabash. The Indiana Journal, at Indianapolis, October 11, said there had passed that town daily for the last four or five weeks, twenty to thirty families, coming from Ohio and going to the Wa- J.ickson JOIO Scott 2:«4 Jefferson N03.S Spcnoer 1882 Jeuuiugs 2000 Snlliv.-ni 3498 Kuox 5437 Switzerland 3034 Lawrence 4416 Vaiiderlnirir 1398 Martin 1032 \v,n^ 3390 Monroe 2679 Wabash 147 Owen 838 Wa.nick 1749 Orange 5368 Washington 2039 Perry 2330 Wryne 12119 Pike 1472 No i-eturns from Dnbois Posey 4061 Estimated 1500 ]tandoli)h 1808 Kijiley 1812 Total 147,600 3« J. H. B. Nowland, Early Reminiscences of Indianapolis; Berry R. Sulgrove, History of Indianapolis and Marion County; Nile's Register, XXII. 48; Weslern Sun, Nov. 8, 1823. gives a notice of the remarkable growth of the town; see also issue of Nov. 3, 1821. A series of articles in the Indiana Journal, Nov. 4, 1846, to Mar. 22. 1847. by a pioneer gives an excellent acconnt of the founding of the capital. THE GOVERNMENT AT CORYDON 245 bash. All seemed in good circumstances. Similar reports came from many other towns in the State. The entries of land at the land office witness the rush of immigrants. In 1816 a land sale opened at Vincennes and in three weeks about 1,500 tracts had been sold for over half a million dollars. Vincennes and Jeff ersonvi lie were the leading land offices in the United States in the amount of business. By 1821 this activity had shifted to Brookville, as a result of the opening of the "New Pur- chase." The latter office, for 1821, took the lead, selling in that year over $200,000 worth of land.-^" By the close of the period the omce at Crawfordsville was handling the rush and setting a record for the United States in the sale of lands. ^•'^ Various means of transportation and travel were in use. A great many of the poorer class, including a large propor- tion of the young men, traveled on foot. The movers usu- ally had wagons drawn by horses or more often by oxen. Accompanying each wagon or train of wagons, for they often "moved" in companies, were droves of cattle, sheep, and hogs attended by the younger men and boys. A trav- eler on the traces met "movers" going and coming. Hun- dreds came to the frontiers, lured by the glowing adver- tisements, only to be scared out on arrival by the sickness prevailing ev^ery where, and by the amount of hard work and harder living everywhere necessary. Thus discour- aged, they soon retraced their journey, A tavern keeper on the New Albany- Vincennes road stated that upwards of 5,000 souls had passed his tavern on the way to Missouri during the year 1819. •'5" Many of these returned imme- diately. 37 This office was located part of the time at Indiaiiaiiolis. 38 For the land office reports see American State Papers. Finance V, index. The following table shows lands sold in State. 1820-1825. Acres. Acres. 1820 162.490 1828 165,046 1821 264.578 1824 154,.558 1822 252.<.I82 1825 162.270 3E> w. Faux. Journal of u Tour to the United States, (1823). 212. (17) 1/ 246 HISTORY OF INDIANA As early as the spring of 1820 a Mr. Foyies projected a stage line from Vincennes to Louisville, making the trip between 6 a. m. Wednesday and 1 p. m. Friday. This was said to be the first stage in Indiana.^" A post stage carry- ing United States mail was established between Louisville and Vincennes April 10, 1824. It left the former place at noon Saturday and arrived, if on time, at Vincennes Tues- day, at 9 a. m., returning to Louisville by Thursday, 6 p. m. The distance was 107V2 miles and the fare $8.00. By May 4, this had been extended on to St. Louis, and on July 14, a branch line started from Vincennes by way of Princeton to Evansville. It made the trip between 8 a. m. Wednes- day and 5 p. m. Thursday.^ ^ Other important traces led from Yellowbanks, north through Spencer county and Dubois, to Washington; from Troy to Paoli ; from Leavenorth to Paoli ; from Mauk's Ferry via Corydon, Salem, Vallonia, Columbus, and Frank- lin to Indianapolis ; from New Albany, via Salem, Orleans, Bedford, Bloomington, and Gosport to the Wabash or to Indianapolis ; from Madison to Columbus ; from Madison to Greensburg; and last and most used was the Cincinnati- Whitewater road to Indianapolis, In the later years of this period the National road began to be used. With the exception of the National road and the Vincennes road, the roads mentioned were mere unimproved traces through the forest, on which a stranger might count himself fortunate if he were not "lost" half the time. Ferries were uncom- mon and dangerous, fords at most seasons deep and muddy. Through the heavy timber these traces rarely dried out. In dodging the mudholes the drivers zigzagged hither and thither among the trees, making the location of the road all the more bewildering to the traveler.^ - Business during this period was usually active, due to the demands of the incoming settlers. A person coming up the river from New Orleans counted 643 loaded flat- •*<> Vincennes Centinel, April 15. 1820. 41 Western Sun, Nov. 8. 1823; May 1. 1824; .July 10. 1824. ^'-Indiana Oazetteer. 1849. 125, gives the experiences of Snniuel .Mer rill going from Corydon to Indianapolis in 1825. THE GOVERNMENT AT CORYDON 247 boats on their way down.^^' The steamer "United States," launched at Jeffersonville May 15, 1819, was the largest on the western rivers. It was 166 feet long, 700 tons burden.^"* However, from 1819 to 1824, the export trade, as it was called, was dead. Grain rotted in the fields or in the stacks. There was no demand for it at New Orleans and there was no money to move it had there been a demand. Business men were unable even to pay the revenue on such goods as were taxed by the federal government. The General As- sembly petitioned Congress not to prosecute for such viola- tions.^"' There was due from land buyers at Jeffersonville January 1, 1819, $1,021,834; at Vincennes, $1,390,909.4« Congress from time to time passed laws in the hope of aid- ing public land debtors. The price of land was lowered from two dollars per acre to one and one-quarter. This immediately ruined all land values in the State, and made the hard times harder.^' Half the State taxes were de- linquent. The years 1820-1822 were pestilential throughout Indi- ana. Promising towns like Palestine and Hindostan were swept from the map. Vevay, Rising Sun, Jeffersonville, and Vincennes were almost deserted. Yellow fever from the south joined forces with ague, malaria, and milk-sick- ness to desolate the frontier.^^ 43 mie's Register, .July 11, 1818. 44 Vincennes Centinel, Mny 22. 1819. 45 Annals IJj Congress, 1st Session, 31. 46 Letters from Nathaniel Ewiug in American State Papers, Finance, III. 734. ^"^ American State Papers, Finarwe, III, 782; Logan Esjire.v. State Banking in Indiana, 221. To add to the losses at AMncennes the large steam mill, the largest in the State, burned Feb. 10. 1821. "A few years past Vincennes was the very emblem of prosi)erity; every wind wafted her some good. Our houses were filled with inhabitants, our streets were crowded with citizens, the noisy hum of business resounded in our ears. All was life and activity. How sadly is the picture re- versed. More than one-third of our dwelling houses are destitute of inhabitants, our population has decreased nearly or quite one-half, our real property has suffered a greater diminution. Buildings, that a few years ago rented for $2fK) or $300 per annum now I'ent for $50 to $100. An universal despondency prevails.*' Western Sun, Feb. 16, 1822. 'i^ Indiana Gazetteer, 18.50, 118-119; Indiana Magazine of History, X, No. 2, "HindoosUm." 248 HISTORY OF INDIANA § 47 Social and Political Organization Beside the ordinary American pioneers who flocked to Indiana there were a few representatives of the peculiar rehgious and economic ideas then prevalent in the East. During the summer of 1814 the Harmonie Community of Economy, Pennsylvania, sold out their interests in the old home and bought a large tract of land, 17,000 acres, in Posey county. Here they cleared fields, built capacious barns, established factories run by steam. By 1817 they had 200 acres of wheat, large vineyards, rye, barley, oats, and pasture fields, with 1,500 Merino sheep and other stock in proportion. In their factories were produced broad- cloth, tinware, shoes, saddles, flour, beer, and other com- modities. From their leader, Frederick Rappe, they were called Rappites. Their general customs were like those of the Shakers. All property was held in common. No bad com- pany was allowed; although they made beer, no one drank any of it. There were no marriages, and no children. For a few years it was the most noted place in the State. ^'^ Several communities more or less like the Harmonie located in different parts of the State. As noticed previ- ously, in Vevay a colony of Swiss from Canton Vaud, Swit- zerland, were cultivating the vine and prospering enough to attract the attention of the eastern newspapers. Their boats annually carried a valuable cargo to the New Orleans market. Besides wine they produced hay, and straw hats for the southern market."*^ Little was accomplished in the way of carrying out the plan of public education provided in the Constitution. The liberal grant of public land by the United States brought no present aid. There was so much cheap public land on the market that the school lands could neither be sold nor rented to advantage. A law of 1816 permitted twenty household- ers in a congressional township to organize and open a 49 Western Sun, Feb. 13, 1819. Samuel Merrill. Indiana Gazetteer, 1850. 3.34. Rapp sold to Robert Dale Owen in 1825: see also Geo. B. Lockwood. The l^ew Hai-mony Movement. 50 isaie's Register, Aug. 23. and Nov. 29, 1817. THE GOVERNMENT AT CORYDON 249 school. A law of 1824 incorporated the congressional town- ship and vested in its board title to the school lands. These trustees are the legal ancestors of our school directors, and this was the beginning of our district school system under the general supervision of the township trustee. Little was done on account of lack of revenues. At the same session, 1816, a law was passed by the Gen- eral Assembly providing for the organization of a seminary in each county. The instruction in these schools was sup- posed to be rather advanced and would prepare the stu- dents for the State Seminary which had been provided for by the law of 1820, and which was opened at Bloomington for students May 1, 1824. It required years of work on the part of the pioneers to find money, materials, and teach- ers to make this ambitious plan a living institution.-^^ Itinerant teachers opened private schools in many places. Mrs. Wood, in 1818, advertising a boarding school at Vincennes in which she taught se^ving, marking, and muslin work in addition to the common branches — an early instance of manual training. Jean Jean advertised for pu- pils in French and Latin. Horace Harding taught portrait painting. Bishop Flaget opened a girls' school in 1823. The old Vincennes Academy flourished also during this period. A State-wide medical society was organized in 1819. An organization of the churches had for its purpose the plac- ing of a Bible in every home in the State. Almost every new town that was laid out in the wilderness made provision for a public library. A reading room was provided at Vin- cennes in which several newspapers from the east and even from Europe could be found. One is surprised, not at the meager facilities for education, but at the universal interest in it and the many ways in which the interest vv^as shown. "'^ The politics of the young State centered around two 51 La«-.s- of Indiana, 1816, 1S20, 1824; Baynard R. Hall. The Neiv Purchase: William A. Rawles, Centralizing Tendencies in the Adminis- tration of Indiana; Theojihilus A. Wylie, Indiana Uniiersity. Its His- tory; R.. G. Boone. History of Education in Indiana. 52 For a good idea of this activity read the Western Sun. and the Centinel of Vincennes. and the Indiana Repul)}iean of Madison. Xo copies of the Corydon papers of this period are available. 250 HISTORY OF INDIANA questions. The first in importance was the policy of the national government toward the public land. The great majority of the settlers bought their land on credit. With the failure of the markets during the hard times from 1818 to 1823, many became embarrassed and not a few lost their partially paid-for land. In response to their petitions Con- gress first gave them extra time on their payments, then reduced the prices of land, and as a final measure allowed purchasers, unable to complete their payments, to forfeit their land and take a due-bill for money already paid, which could then be used in the purchase of land at any future time. The second political issue of importance to Indianians was internal improvements. The pioneers were very anx- ious to have the national government open up the streams and help build roads. William Hendricks, the first con- gressman of the State, was their champion in both these measures. He was without question the most popular man in the State, though Governor Jennings was the shrewdest politician. In 1817 the political opponents of Hendricks brought out Ex-Governor Posey as a candidate for Congress, but Hendricks was reelected to Congress by an overwhelming majority. In 1819 Lieutenant Governor Christopher Har- rison made the race against Jennings for the governorship, but was badly defeated.^s In 1822 William Hendricks succeeded Jennings as gov- ernor and Jennings became congressman in place of Hen- dricks. The first real political contest in the State took place in 1824 between the supporters of Clay, Adams, and Jack- son for the presidency.^4 For the first time there was county organization and platforms with handbills for the voters. In general the sympathies of the pioneers were for the 53 Western Sun, Nov. 14. 1818; Def-. 26. 1818; July 24. 1819; Mn.v 1. 1819; M.iy 22, 1819; Nile's Register, Sept. 25. 1819. 54 The electors in 1816 niid in 1820 were appointed by the General Assembly. THE GOVERNMENT AT CORYDON 251 rough and rugged Jackson. It was known that Jackson opposed the banks, and, on that ground, received the sup- port of great numbers of financially embarrassed settlers who attributed the scarcity of money to the manipulation of bankers. These men held a State convention at Salem, September 16, 1824, and nominated an electoral ticket and appointed a State committee to conduct the campaign.^^ The business men and the well-to-do farmers usually favored Clay on account of his position on the tariff and internal improvements. Indiana voters favored both these measures throughout the early period, Adams stood well with the lawyers and other profes- sional men and was the favorite among the Quakers and other settlers on the Whitewater. The result showed the great popularity of Jackson. He received 7,343 votes, Clay 5,315, and Adams 3,093."'" Jackson received his highest vote in Washington county. Clay his highest in Jefferson, and Adams his in Wayne. The total vote was light, being only 15,751, out of a voting population of more than twice that number. The young State was receiving some attention, however, from the east and was not being slighted by politicians. In 1817 Henry Clay visited the State and was entertained by the city of Vincennes."'" In 1819 while President James Monroe was making a tour of the west he, in company with General Andrew Jackson, stopped at Jeffersonville and was escorted by the State militia out to Corydon, where a bar- becue was prepared. -^i^ But most sumptuous of all was the banquet tendered General Lafayette at Jeffersonville April 16, 1825.^^' The opponents of slavery had had no difficulty in the constitutional convention in barring slavery from the State, but they could not so easily free the State from embarrass- ment on this subject. Trouble arose from three sources. A great many col- 55 Western t^iin, Sept. 25, 1824. 56 Western Sun, Dec. 4. 1824. 57 Western Sun, June 7. 1817; Nile's Register, June 6. 1S17. 58 Ccntinel. .Tuly 17. 1819 : Indiana EepuhJiean, July 3, 1810. 59 Western Sun. Apr. 2P>: Apr. HO; M;\y 28; and July 2, 1825. 252 HISTORY OF INDIANA ored men, who had by various means secured their freedom in the South, came to Indiana to live. As a rule they be- came paupers and a charge on the county. So many cases of this kind had occurred that when W. E. Summers of Williamson county, Tennessee, asked permission of the First Assembly to buy homes and settle his forty freedmen in Indiana the question caused an animated contest. In a long letter John Dumont, chairman of the house committee, attempted to show Mr. Summers why colored persons were not wanted in the State. The house refused to send Mr. Dumont's letter and the General Assembly was unable to agree on any answer.*^" More aggravating than this question of colored paupers was the constant complaint made by Southern newspapers that fugitive slaves escaping into Indiana were aided in making their escape. In answer to these charges the First Assembly made anj^one aiding in this matter liable to a $500 claim for damage.'" In 1825 two citizens of Wayne county were so fined. Still worse was the custom of kidnapping free negroes and carrying them back to slavery, as practiced by unprin- cipled men along the border. July 4, 1818, three such men stole a negro girl from Corydon,*^- in 1821 a mob from Louisville attempted to kidnap a free colored man named Moses at New Albany. Nothing but the presence of the militia company saved the negro.''-^ September 21, 1822, James Burks tried to capture Edmund Robinson, a free col- ored man of Richmand. The latter escaped, but the attempt caused great excitement.^'^ The sentiment of the citizens of the State was not the same, however, in all parts of the State. Thus, while Noble and Hendricks were being severely denounced at a mass meeting at Montgomeryville for opposing the admission of 60 Nile's Register, XI. 313; House Journal 1. 33, 43. A bill to admit three colored settlers was introduced but failed to pass. Senate Journal, 1816, 7. 61 Laws of Indiana, 1816. ch. XXIV. 62 Nile's Register, XIV, 328. 63 Vincennes Centincl, March 3, 1821. 6-t Richmond Intelligencer, Sept. 25, 1822. THE GOVERNMENT AT CORYDON 253 Missouri as a slave State, the General Assembly, by a vote of 22 to 5, censured Taylor for voting for the Missouri Compromise and thus permitting slavery.'^^ The General Assembly further w^ent on record, Decem- ber 31, 1818, in a hot denunciation of the kidnapping of negroes on the border. The senators were instructed and the representatives requested to oppose in Congress all fugitive slave laws. 6>> Nile's Register, XIX, 415. CHAPTER XI economic development from 1825-1835 § 48 Early Roads When Indiana was admitted into the Union it contained about 65,000 people. These lived chiefly in the Whitewater Valley, on the lower Wabash, and along the Ohio river hills. The problem of travel was a serious one and was not liable to be overlooked by legislators who had made the trip to Corydon or Indianapolis. There were well defined lines of travel leading into the interior of Indiana at this time, each in a measure used by a distinct stream of immigrants. From Kentucky, Vir- ginia, and the Carolinas, they came to Madison and Louis- ville. From Madison, a stage line was early established to the East Fork of White river, or Driftwood creek, cross- ing at the mouth of Flat Rock. From Louisville, Jefferson- ville, and New Albany two routes led to the interior ; one by Salem, Bono, Bedford, and Bloomington to the Wabash at Lafayette; the other led by Greenville, Fredericksburg, Paoli, Mt. Pleasant, and Maysville to the Wabash at Vin- cennes. One can scarcely realize the condition of travel in 1825. There was no railroad, no canal, no pike. All the rivers except the Ohio were obstructed by fallen trees, ripples, and bars. Two main roads led to Indianapolis, one from Madison, the other from Centerville. The transportation service, if any was to be had, v/as bad, roads frequently im- passable and stages usually late. Two schemes for carrying on internal traffic were early taken up by the Indiana government. The earliest was the building of State roads with the three per cent fund. Con- gress had set aside five per cent of the net proceeds of all ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 255 the land sold in Indiana for road building. Three per cent of this was placed at the disposal of the General Assembly, and was always known as the three per cent fund. In 1818 Christopher Harrison was appointed the first agent of this fund. He received the money from the United States and paid it out, according to appropriation by the General As- sembly, to the county agent. The county agent used it in opening roads through the forest. Such roads, known as State roads, were one hundred feet wide, but the money was not sufficient to do more than clear them of timber. Until the country was settled more thickly, and there were consequently more "hands" to work the roads, these were little more than bridle paths. Yet much of the time of the General Assembly from 1818 to 1840 was occupied in au- thorizing these roads and distributing the three per cent fund. In 1821, $10,000 was appropriated. The fund was usually overdrawn; nevertheless it was a great aid to the pioneers, most of whom earned money, working on the roads at $1.50 per day, to pay their annual taxes. All told, over one-half a million dollars were received by the State for this purpose. Various fanciful schemes were discussed in the legislature from time to time for disposing of the fund, but on the whole it was loyally used. As early as 1802 the subject of a National Road had oc- cupied the attention of Congress, and in the bill admitting Ohio five per cent of the proceeds of the public land sales in that State was set aside as a fund for building roads by which emigrants might reach the public lands of the west. Four years later, a bill passed Congress for a survey of a road from Cumberland, Maryland, to the Ohio river. The route followed the old Braddock trail nearly to the Battleground, and then turned to the west, striking the Ohio at Wheeling. 1 It is not usually realized by Americans that this is the greatest wagon road in the world. It was surveyed eighty feet in width, the timber was then grubbed, and the ground graded. Culverts and bridges were built of cut stone, and 1 Sehaff, Historii of Eimi and KirkrrsriJIc. 61 •syy/,- TikJUiiui Magazine of History, III. 58 xff/. 256 HISTORY OF INDIANA at last a track in the center, thirty to forty feet wide, was macadamized with ten inches of stone. Two six-horse teams could race abreast on this road. In 1818 the road reached to Wheeling, in 1833 to Columbus, Ohio, and in 1852 to Vandalia, Illinois. From six to twelve independent stage lines operated on it, and a score of companies were in the transportation busi- ness. The schedule of the mail stage was thirty hours from Washington to Wheeling, forty-five hours to Columbus, sixty hours to Indianapolis, and seventy-five hours to Van- dalia. Only thoroughbred Virginia horses were used on the best lines, and the sound of the bugle was as certain an indication of the time of day as the passing of passenger trains on railroads today. The coachman was a man of con- sequence along the route, and almost an idol for the boys. To see him dash up to a post, throw the lines to the stable boys, tell the latest news from the east while the teams were changing, then break away at a fifteen-mile clip, was enough to attract all the youngsters for a mile or two. The driver usually courted this admiration, and never missed a chance to take a boy on the seat with him — a favor the boy paid for with apples and cider, and remembered with pride during the rest of his life. A guild of wagoners soon grew up in the freight business, who were well known and thor- oughly reliable. The road was surveyed in Indiana by Jonathan Knight, a government surveyor. He reached Indianapolis July 8, 1827, finishing it by September 4, of the same year, to the western boundary of the State.- The road in Indiana is almost straight, crossing the State with a loss of only two miles from a straight line. The distance from the eastern State line to Indianapolis is seventy-one miles; from In- dianapolis to Farrington's ferry at Terre Haute, where it crossed the Wabash, is seventy and one-fourth miles. The national government was slow in completing the road in Indiana. In 1830, $60,000 were appropriated. This was used in building the sixteen miles east and twelve miles west of the capital. The old covered bridge on Washing- ^ Indiana Journal. .July 10. niul Sept. 4. l.'^27. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 257 ton street, Indianapolis, where the road crossed White river, was built in 1834. The macadamized road became Wash- ington street and was the first improved street in the capi- tal. Congress finally abandoned it in Indiana in 1839. It then became the property of the State, which leased it to the "Plank Road Company." This company covered a great part of the road west of Indianapolis with heavy, narrow, oak planks, which made an excellent road for a few years. When the planks wore out the company abandoned it and it became a public county road. It was then graveled and still remains one of the best roads in the State.^ Thirty-four different acts of Congress show how im- portant the road was in a national way. It cost $6,824,919, but it was never completed. It was surveyed and opened to Vandalia and St. Louis, but was never macadamized be- yond Indiana. Congress did not overestimate its value. It was a powerful agent for the Union, and a material symbol of its power and usefulness. It bound the East and the West together and brought them three days' travel nearer each other. During the twenty years of its greatness a steady stream of ''movers," with their covered wagons and droves of cattle, hogs, and sheep, poured into Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois. For months at a time there was no moment in the daytime that a family wagon was not in sight. At night the road appeared like the picket line of an army. Having traveled over this road, the memory of it lingered long and came back especially vivid as one traveled over the corduroy or mud roads of early Indiana. Most of the settlers of the central and east- ern part of the State were familiar with "the old pike." § 49 The Michigan Road Article two of the treaty between the Pottawattomie Indians and United States commissioners, made October IG, 1826, ceded to the State of Indiana what was considered a sufficient amount of land to build a public highway from Lake Michigan to the Ohio. This road was to be one hun- 3 Berry R. Sulgrove, History of liidianapolis, 107. 258 HISTORY OF INDIANA dred feet wide, and to this right of way the Indians added a further gift of a section of contiguous land for every mile. Where the contiguous land did not belong to the Indians — all south of the Wabash — Indiana was to select a section of unsold Indian land for every mile of road. The United States confirmed the treaty February 7, 1827, and con- firmed to the State the gift made bj' the Indians by act of March 2, 1827.^ In 1828 John I. Neely, Chester Elliott, and John Mc- Donald were appointed commissioners to lay down the road from Lake Michigan to Indianapolis."' They were instructed to select the best natural harbor on the lake ; or, in the ab- sence of a good one, the best place to construct an artificial one. The route from Logansport to the lake offered con- siderable difficulty. The terms of the grant were for a di- rect road which would necessarily lead through the Kan- kakee swamps, where nobody lived, and where it would be very costly to build a road. To avoid this, the road would have to run due north from Logansport to the South Bend of the St. Joseph, thence west to Lake Michigan. The point where Michigan City now stands — the mouth of Trail creek — was selected for the northern terminus. Then two com- plete sets of field notes and plats were made, one for a road by South Bend, the other direct through the Kankakee flats. The choice of routes was thrown back on the General Assembly and caused much angry discussion.^ The com- missioners, it was asserted, had been unduly influenced by the citizens of South Bend. January 13, 1830, the route of the second survey by the way of South Bend was chosen." The act of January 29, 1830, established the road from Logansport via Indianapolis and Greensburg to Madison.^ 4 For the best discussion of the Miehigran road see a decision by .Tudge Black, of Bloomington. Indiana, in the case of the Western Union Telegraph Company vs. Krueger, 74 Northeastern. 453. The historical part was written by Charles Moores, of Indianapolis, one of the attor- neys in the case. Also Senate Doc. XXXV, 453: Indiana Magazine of History, III. SO. 5 Laws of Indiana, 1827, ch. 70. 6 Laws of Indiana, 1830, ch. 148 — Joint Resolution. 7 Laws of Indiana, 1829, ch. 69, sec. 1. 8 Laws of Indiana, ch. 70. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 259 A new board, consisting of Samuel Hanna of Wayne county, William Polke of Knox, and Abraham McClellan of Sulli- van county, was named. This board served only one year and was abolished by act of January 4, 1831. From this time on the whole work was entrusted to William Polke. The road was expected to be cleared and grubbed from Madison to the Wabash by November 30, 1831. Three surveying parties, headed by Commissioners Hanna, McClellan, and Polke, spent the summer of 1830 selecting and surveying Indian lands.-' They had not made their final report until they were notified that Congress had refused to ratify their choice and had demanded that the road be laid down and then "contiguous" sections be chosen. 1" Further, the sections must be selected from land not yet ceded by the Indians. The construction of the road went steadily on, however, scrip being used instead of money. This scrip was based on ceded lands and almost the whole road was financed with it. Noah Noble, who had the southern end in charge, laid off the road in sections of four miles each. By act of February 4, 1831, Polke opened the sale of land at Logansport. No land was to be sold un- der $1.25 per acre. The part of the road from Logansport to St. Joseph county was ordered under contract at a price not exceeding $150 per mile. The road was divided into three sections. ^^ The first, from Madison to Indianapolis, was under the immediate supervision of Daniel Kelso ; the second reached to Logansport and was under Horace Bas- sett ; the last was under Polke himself. Contracts for build- ing the road were let during the year 1832. Beginning at Madison, the road was laid oflF into sections of from ten to twenty miles each and the grading let to the lowest bidder. Bridges were let under separate contracts. The whole road, 265 miles long, was put under contract by June 30. During 1832 lands were placed on sale at Laporte.^^ Scrip was ac- cepted in payment for all lands. The road was cleared one » Western Sun, Oct. 30. 1830. 10 Western Sun, .Tan. 15, 1831. 11 House Journal, 1834, 106. 12 House Journal, 1833, Appendix. 260 HISTORY OF INDIANA hundred feet wide, thirty feet of which was grubbed and graded. By 1836 it was clearly ascertained that this made a poor road. In the worst stretches logs were laid cross- wise and covered with sand. Many bridges were washed away every year by the streams. Although the road was used enormously north of Indianapolis, it was anything but satisfactory. It passed through fourteen counties, and was used by the inhabitants of thirty-five in going to the capital. The General Assembly at almost every session had to make an appropriation for repairs. By 1837 the State was not able to give further aid to it, the State's resources being completely prostrated. By act of February 2, 1837, the various county boards, through whose jurisdiction the road ran, were required to divide it into suitable sections, over each of which a supervisor was to be placed with power to call out the hands to keep it in repair. ^2 The hands were liable to two days' work a year. By act of February 13, 1841, and January 31, 1842, the road was classed with all other State roads and brought entirely within the compass of the general road law of 1838. The Michigan road began at Madison, ran almost due north through Jefferson and Ripley counties to Greensburg in Decatur. Thence by a direct line, it led across Shelby county to the capital. The important sections of the road were those from Indianapolis across Hamilton, Boone, Clin- ton, and Carroll counties to Logansport, and from that place due north again across Cass, Fulton, and Marshall, to South Bend, and thence west to Michigan City. During eight months of the year it was an open passable highway, but during the winter it was an endless stream of black mud and almost useless. Its importance may be estimated from the fact that one-half the pioneers of the northwest quarter of Indiana reached their homes over it. As a road it was not comparable to the National, but it was an available means of reaching a very attractive country when there was none other. 13 Laics of Indkina. ISoG. ch. 49. sec. 3. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 261 § 50 Stage Lines The stage coach followed close on the trail of the pio- neers. Early in the spring of 1820 a Mr. Foyles started a stage line from Louisville to Vincennes. The advertise- ment stated that it was the first line to be established in the State. This is perhaps true. The trace from Louisville to Vincennes is the oldest in the State. At first it ran along the boundary between Crawford and Orange counties fol- lowing the south bank of Driftwood and crossing White river north of Petersburg. But the settlement of the towns of Washington, Mt. Pleasant, Hindostan, and Paoli caused most travelers to go by the northern route. It was over these routes that Fo^^les established his stage line, using whichever road seemed best. This line continued in operation till it was superseded by the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad just before the Civil War.i^ The General Assembly petitioned Congress in 1829 for a grant of land to aid in building a clay turnpike over this route, but no aid was received. i'' One among the first advertisements of a regular stage line to Indianapolis appears to have been that of John Wil- son. This line from Madison began during the summer of 1828. The stage left Indianapolis at 7 a. m. Thursday, reached Columbus via Franklin at 5 p. m. Friday, left there at 7 a. m. Saturday and arrived at Madison via Vernon at 5 p. m. Sunday. The fare was six and one-quarter cents per mile with fifteen pounds of baggage free. In 1830 James Johnson started a line from Lawrence- burg, making the distance in two days and one night. The next year, 1831, A. L. and W. L. Ross put stages on the Brookville road. These connected at Brookville with A. McCarty's line for Cincinnati, and at Rushville with the Ohio stage. The Brookville stage made the trip in two days, or three days to Cincinnati. In June, 1832, P. Beers advertised that his stage would make the trip from In- 14 At present a stage runs from Paoli to New All)any over this same road, now a macadamized turnpike. This is tlie oldest jiike in the 8tate and also the oldest stage line. 1^ //((?/««« Journal, Dec. 24. 1829. (18) 262 HISTORY OF INDIANA dianapolis to Dayton, Ohio, in two and one-half days, or, connecting- at Eaton, the passenger could reach Cincinnati in two and one-half days. The following summer, April 26, James Johnson and Company put on a through line of stages between Cincinnati and Indianapolis via Lawrence- burg, Napoleon, Greensburg, and Shelbyville. The John- son coaches made the trip in two days and nights, the fare being $5.50 one way. Not to be outdone in this race, James H. Wallace and Company, the next spring, put coaches on the Madison line which made the trip in one day, leaving Indianapolis Mon- days, Wednesdays and Fridays at 3 a. m. and reaching Madison at 8 p. m. in time to catch the Cincinnati packet, which would land them early next morning at Cincinnati, after a night's sleep and a good breakfast. Hacks were kept at each end of the route for the convenience of those who did not want to travel so swiftly. In 1835 Seth M. Leavenworth, founder of the town by that name in Craw- ford county, in partnership with John Orchard and Jona- than Williams, started a stage line from Leavenworth via Fredonia, Milltown, Proctersville, Paoli, Orleans, Bedford, Springville, Bloomington, Martinsville, and Port Royal to Indianapolis. This line was intended especially for stu- dents going to the State College and for boatmen return- ing from down river.^** Meanwhile lines were being projected into other parts of the State. The heavy immigration into the Wabash coun- try soon caused a great amount of travel to Terre Haute, Lafayette, and Logansport. As early as 1838, C. Vigus of Logansport put on a line of stages from Indianapolis through Logansport to Michigan City. At the same time, W. L. Ross was making preparations for starting a line from Lafayette, through Logansport and Peru to Fort Wayne. At Lafayette the Ross stages connected with the Indianapolis stage via Crawfordsville, and at Fort Wayne connection was made for Toledo. On these lines were beau- tiful four-horse coaches carrying the United States mails. 16 Indiana Journal, May 15, 1835. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 263 The former line made the trip twice a week from Michigan City to the capital. In September the Vigus's changed their route so that the main line extended from Niles, Michigan, to Indianapo- lis. At Niles, it connected with the daily Chicago and De- troit stages; at Plymouth, a stage for Laporte and Michi- gan City could be had; at Indianapolis, connections could be made with daily stages for Dayton and Cincinnati, Mad- ison and Terre Haute, or with tri-weekly stages to Cincin- nati and Louisville. The bright new stages of the Vigus line cost $600 each and were the pride of the settlers along the way.^'^ Traveling in the early coaches was not unmixed pleas- ure. If the roads were dry, the passengers had to hold on tightly as the stage bounced from rock to rock. If the roads were wet, there was danger from overturning. In 1838 a stage mired and turned over on Washington street, Indian- apolis, seriously injuring several of the occupants. Cross- ing streams was attended with risk. The roadway may have been washed away, leaving the stage to turn over. Congressman John Test had his leg broken in 1830, when the Cincinnati stage turned over in crossing Mill creek.^^ § 51 Opening Streams for Navigation The second plan of the General Assembly to secure in- ternal communication was to open up the streams for navi- gation. The natural features of the State easily lent them- selves to this plan. The southern boundary was a naviga- ble river from which numerous tributaries led into the in- terior. On the west was the Wabash, crossing the State diagonally, and sending off large branches to almost every county. The northeast was accessible from the Maumee, while the northwest had the St. Joseph river and Lake Michigan. Unfortunately, all the streams, except the Ohio, were too small for successful navigation ; but it was 1" These advertisements are found in the Logansport Telegraph, the Indiana Journal, and Indiana Democrat of Indianapolis, the Madison Courier, and the Lafayette Free Press. i& Indiana Demoo)~at, Dec. 4, 1830. 264 HISTORY OF INDIANA thought that, by clearing them of snags and bars, they could be made navigable for pirogues and small flatboats. They would thus answer the purpose of highways, at least for the present. The first step in transforming these streams into highways was to declare them navigable wa- terways, thus forbidding their obstruction by milldams and bridges.!-* This work was begun during the Fourth Session of the General Assembly at Corydon. By a combination bill ap- proved January 17, 1820, almost every creek large enough to float a sawlog was opened, so far as a statute without an appropriation would effect it.-^' Later the General Assem- bly tried a different plan.-^ January 21, 1826, John Eaton, Jacob Wolf, and Joseph Latshaw were commissioned to clear Busseron creek from Eaton's mills to its mouth in the Wabash above Vincennes. Log creek in Switzerland county, Plumb creek in the same county, Big Indian creek in Morgan county. Lick creek in Orange county, Lost river in Orange county, Mississinewa river from Marion to Peru, Brushy Fork of Muscatatuck, and Eel river up into Put- 19 The ordinance of 17S7 provided tliat: "Tlie nrivigable waters lead- ing into tlie Mississippi and St. liavvreuce. aiad the carrjing jjlaces be- tween the same, sliall be common highways, and forever free, as well to the inhabitants of said territory as to the citizens of the United St.ites. and those of any other State that may be admitted into the Confeder- acy, without any tax. imiwst or duty therefor." This plainly meant "Navigable" for the canoes and bateaux then used for navigation, and the early legislation was based on that undei*standing. -•» Laws of Indiana, 1820, ch — , p. 59. By this law White river to the forks at Daviess county: West fork to the Delaware towns near Mimcie; East fork to Flat Rock in Shelby <-ounty: ^Muscatatuck from its mouth to Vernon: Big Blue to Fredericksburg near the south line of Washington county: W^hitewater from the north boundary of Fayette county to the Ohio: Anderson from its mouth at Troy to the Hurricane fork near St. Meiurad: Poison creek to Cumming's mill; Oil creek to Aaron Cunningham's mill (the two latter entirely in Perry county) ; Raccoon creek in Parke county to Brook's mill: Big creek to Black's mill: Loughrey creek in Ohio county up to Hartford: Patoka river to Moseby's mill ; Indian creek in Ilai-rison county : Indian Kentucky ci-eek for a few miles in Jefferson county up to Brook's mill : Little Pigeon and Rig Pigeon creeks, the latter at Evansville, the former between Spencer and Warrick counties: Big Sand creek to its forks near Scipio in Jennings county, were all declared navigable streams. 21 Lans of Indiana, 1825. chs. 34, 35. 36. 37, 38. 39. 40. See also ibid. 1826, chs. 29, 40. 41. 42, and 1827. chs. 42, 43. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 265 nam county, were likewise put in commission. The county boards of justices had chief control of most of this work. The commissioners were empowered to call out the "hands" living within two miles of the stream to help clear it. Little serious effort was ever spent on any of the minor streams, but great hopes were built on the possibilities of the White and Wabash rivers. It was confidently believed that White river could be opened to year-round navigation for boats of large tonnage. Much labor was spent on these streams, but the recurring freshets kept the rivers full of drifts and uprooted trees. The journals of the General Assembly contain numerous petitions to break up drifts that had interrupted navigation. The streams formed the main outlet for the surplus farm products of their valleys. Flatboats were built, loaded in convenient pools, and, when the water reached the proper stage, were floated down to the Wabash and Ohio, then either reshipped or taken to New Orleans. Hundreds of these went down the Wabash every year. Upstream navigation was well-nigh impossible, but was occassionally resorted to when roads were impassable. It was difficult to get along the shore with a tow line, so the only way to propel a boat upstream was with sharp poles set against the bottom. This plan was used most on the upper Wabash from Lafayette to Logansport and Peru. Steamboats rarely went above Lafayette, and for several years an extensive commerce in salt and manufactured goods was carried on, between that place and upstream towns, by means of pole boats. For this purpose they used a flat-bottomed boat thirty to forty feet long, with four foot guards, along which six or eight men walked and pushed with spike poles set against the bottom. In this manner three or four tons could be transported eight to ten miles a day. Merchants from the river towns frequently induced masters of small steamers to undertake to navigate the smaller rivers. In 1828 merchants from Indianapolis, Spen- cer, and Bloomington chartered the steamer "Triton," fifty- two tons burden, to carry a cargo from Louisville. It left 266 HISTORY OF INDIANA Louisville April 24 and in four days reached a drift four- teen miles below Spencer.-- Two years later the "Trav- eler," under Captain Smith, reached Spencer in three days from Louisville. As early as 1827 Noah Noble, later gov- ernor, tried to induce the Kanawha Salt Company to send a steamer to Indianapolis, but was unsuccessful. The "Vic- tory" came within fifty miles of the capital during the year, but was compelled to turn back. On April 11, 1831, there appeared in White river, at Indianapolis, a real steamboat, the "Robert Hanna." Not only was there a real steamboat, but it was pushing a heav- ily laden keel barge. The citizens of Indianapolis had al- ways claimed that White river was navigable. Now who could deny it? No excitement in the history of the town compared to this. Every man, woman and child lined up on the banks of the river. There was no time for sleep that night. Early the next day Capt. B. I. Blythe paraded his artillery company on the bank and fired a salute. The cap- tain of the boat then offered to take the ladies who wished to go on an excursion up the river. There was no lack of volunteers and the gallant captain had to make a second trip.23 The boat had been purchased by Hanna & Com- pany, contractors on the National Road, to be used to haul stone from the Port Royal Bluffs for the big bridge across White river. The boat was not built on the lines required and had to be sent back. On its return trip it ran on a bar at Hog Isand, a few miles down, and lay there till winter. However, the event added greatly to the reputation of the capital and limited the swaggering of the members from the river cities, Madi- son, New Albany, and Vincennes. There were many attempts in the early years of Indi- ana to pilot steamboats up to the upper Wabash towns. The best water came in March usually. In 1821 Mr. Lin- ton, a trader from Terre Haute, had a steamer run to that town, which they estimated to be three hundred miles from 22 Indiana Journal, May 15, 1828. 23 Indiana Journal. April 16, 1831. EiVEKS AND Streams of Indiana. 268 HISTORY OF INDIANA the Ohio.-^ A merchant of Lafayette, named Elston, freighted a steamer to that town as early as 1825. On March 24, 1830, Capt. John Moon, of Ripley, Ohio, ran the "Paragon" to the mouth of Rock creek, about twelve miles below Logansport. He reported good water — six and one- half feet — on the bar below Logansport. These reports, and the fact that boats could be loaded anywhere along the river for the New Orleans market, brought a rush of settlers. The steamer "American," James L. Wilson, master, was during the time making regular trips from Louisville to Terre Haute.-^ The steamer "Lawrence" from Cincinnati, 125 tons burden, chartered by Sloan and Landes, reached Covington March 18, 1827, only six months after the sale of lots for that town had been held. The same year a steamer made its way up to Lafayette.-** The shopkeepers of Delphi and Peru had tried, unsuc- cessfully for some years to secure regular navigation up to those towns.-' Finally, they prevailed on the master of the 24 Miami Times quoted iu Tiic Western Sun. May 8, 1830. -5 Fi-om the Western Sun of Ajiril 25, 182!>, tlie following: river iiewst is taken: April 17, "Criterion" arrived from Lafayette to Shawnee- town ; 18, "Viotory"' from Lafayette to Louisville; IS), "Wm. Tell" from Cincinnati to Lafayette; 21, "Criterion" i-eturaed from Sliawneetown with a barge of salt In tow. From the s;nne pi.per. Ajiril 2C. 1831, is the following: April 10. "PeiU-!" from Shawneetown to Eugene; April 17, "Fairy" froni Louisville to Lafayette; April 18, "Pearl" on return to Shawneetown; April 20. "Forester" from Lafayette to Louisville: April 18. "Java" Louisville to Eugene : on the 23. the "Experiment" made the trip, the first on record, from New Orleans direct to Terre Haute. In the issue of March 27, 1834, these arrivals at Vincennes were noted: March 22, '"Camden" from Lafayette, and "Shylock" from the mouth of the Wabash; 24, "Salem" from Pittsburg, and "Tennessee" from Lafayette; 25. "Logansport" from Deli)hi : "Sabine" from Pittsburg: "Fairy" from the mouth of the Wabiish: 2(5. "Tide" from Lafayette: "Wm. Hurlbut" from Cincinnati: on 20. "Monroe" and "Salem" down from Lafayette. From April 14 to 27, forty-one boats landed at Terre Haute. The "Indian" was built that sin-ing expressly to do the carry- ing trade from Cincinnati to Lafayette. While the stage of water would permit — during February, March and Aiiril — there was at le.ist one boat per day at the Vincennes wharf. -fi Indiana Gazette, April 3, 1827. -" Sanford Cox, RecrjUections of an Old Settler, Lafayette (ISGO). ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 269 little steamer, "Republican," to make a trial trip. Accord- ingly, on the June rise, 1834, the start was made with a number of Logansport men on board, and also the interested merchants. The boat moved along beautifully till, a few miles above the Delphi landing, it began to strike. The crew had to get out at sandbars and lift and push. Haw- sers were run ashore and used as tow lines. Finally it struck the Georgetown Bar and stuck fast. Captain Towe, as well as Colonel Pollard and Job Eldridge, who had goods aboard, got out in the water and pushed and hauled. It was no use. Twenty yoke of cattle were hitched on and the little "Republican," shorn of much of her prestige, but still alive, steamed into the harbor at Logansport. The return trip was never attempted. The boat bilged and sank near the mouth of Eel river.- ^ This, if not the first, w^as among the first of the steamboats that ever went up so far. The soundings taken by the "Republican" showed that Delphi could be reached easily; and the next year a petition was sent to Congress by the Delphians asking that that place be made a port of entry. A like excitement was caused on the St. Joseph three years later when the "Matilda Barney" steamed down to the South Bend on her way to Elkhart and Goshen. She had on board one hundred passengers and ten tons of freight, and was drawing thirteen inches of water. Everybody in reach rushed to the banks to see the wonder. Land along the river rose over night from $5 to $10 per acre.'-*' The most promising point along the river at that time was the iron foundry at Mishawaka. § 52 The Flatboat Trade It is not beyond the fact to say that nine-tenths of the surplus produce of Indiana from 1820 to 1840 was carried to market on flatboats. The merchants did most, but by no means all, of the boating business. Early in the spring they put their boat carpenters to work. The finest poplars -8 Dr. J;imes H. Stewart, RccoUcvtioiis of Carroll Vonnlij, Ciuciunati, 1873. 29 Western. Bun, May 31, 1834. 270 HISTORY OF INDIANA in the neighboring forest were marked for gunwales. Some of these were eighty feet long. They were usually cut be- fore the sap rose in the spring and left in the woods as long as possible to season. By the first of the following March the boats must be completed and at the landing ready for loading. The loading of the boats was no ordinary event in the neighborhood. The produce had all been prepared be- forehand and in many cases had been stored in a warehouse at the landing. The owners of the boats watched the stage of the water, and when it was thought to be favorable, they sent word to everybody in the neighborhood either to bring in their produce or come with all hands and the teams to load the boats. It was usual for the women to come also, not only to cook for the hands, but to help wrap and store away the goods on the boat. It was a time of great gaiety. On the bank stood a barrel of whiskey with its head knocked in and a gourd to drink from. When the loading was done and the boats gone, a frolic at the nearest and most com- modious house or barn closed the event. By 1827 the New Orleans market was failing, not on* account of the quantity of produce, but on account of the time and manner of reaching it. Three-fourths of the mar- ketable produce of the Mississippi Valley was run out in March. This deluge struck New Orleans all at once; and, it being a small city, was unable to care for it till it could be shipped to New York. In the spring of 1826, one hun- dred and fifty-two flatboats passed Vincennes loaded for New Orleans. They carried 250,000 bushels of corn, 100,- 000 barrels of pork, 10,000 hams, 2,500 live cattle, 10,000 pounds of beeswax, 3,600 venison hams, besides hogs, oats, meal, chickens, etc.-'"^' From these statistics it is evident that about three hundred flatboats left the Wabash each year. From Lawrenceburg to Mount Vernon on the Ohio there was scarcely a five mile stretch but what had its "landing," where flatboats were loaded for the down-river trade. In 1828 David Guard & Brothers, farmers on the river above Lawrenceburg, bought the abandoned steamer "Scioto" and •■"> Western Snn, .Tune 17, 1826. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 271 transformed it into a barge, on which they placed 600 live hogs, a large number of fat cattle, chickens, geese, corn, 500 kegs of lard, 500 barrels of pork, and other produce, all from their own farm, and set out, March 10, for New Or- leans.^i From this same port twenty-seven such boats were run in one year. Down below, at Vevay, the Dufours and Schencks, known by their products throughout the east, loaded their annual fleet with wine, hay, straw hats, and other produce of this energetic French community. Madi- son, the center of the pork-packing industry in the State, did the largest down river business of any town in the State. Not only from the river-board but from the tribu- tary streams, such as Pigeon and Anderson, Oil and Blue, Indian and Loughry, came numberless boats. Scores of busy little town-landings of that day have completely dis- appeared from the map. Such were Maysville, Hindostan, Palestine, Fredonia, Pittsburg, Port Royal and Darlington. Passengers and pilots on upstream steamboats counted hundreds of flatboats in a single day. John Matthews, a veteran boatman of Indiana, commenting on the large num- ber of boatmen at New Orleans in the spring of 1829, ob- served that over half were from Indiana. ■'- As far as possible the boatmen gathered in groups, often ten to twenty boats keeping company. When a fleet of them tied up in a down-river port like Paducah, Natchez, Vicksburg, or Plaquemine the crews had high revels. Old rivermen indulged in all kinds of jokes on green hands, then on their first trip. At New Orleans there were sights to keep all on the alert. The splendor of the theatres, gar- dens, churches, and stores were such as the young boatmen had never dreamed of. Scarcely an hour was spent in sleep during the three or four days' stay by those on their first trip. The merchant or master was busy during this time dis- posing of his cargo and buying goods with the proceeds. Little cash was brought back to Indiana. The return trip 31 Laicrericehiirff Palladium., March 15. 1828. 32 Indiana Journal, August 1, 1834. 272 HISTORY OF INDIANA was not so pleasant for the boatmen as the going. Until about 1840 most of the men returned on foot. This was not only tiresome but dangerous. The down-river country, and especially the roads frequented by returning boatmen, were infested by thieves and robbers. Gangs of gamblers, mur- derers, and river pirates preyed on' the commerce from Cairo to New Orleans. Frequently, as in the case of the one at Cave-in-the-Rocks, Illinois, pirate bands were strong enough to overpower a flatboat crew and rob them. After 1840, or thereabouts, the boatmen returned by steamer to the nearest Ohio river town, and thence walked home. Those from the Wabash towns landed at Evans- ville; those from the central part of the State landed at Leavenvv^orth, or New Albany. § 53 Early Mail Service The chief means of communication between Indianians and the outside world was the United States mails. These were necessarily infrequent and irregular. The mail routes were laid out and the service directed by Congress, and there seems at this date to have been little cause for com- plaint by the pioneers. Sometimes the carrier was delayed a few days by high water. Frequently he was drowned in trying to swim his horse across a flooded river. More frequently the postmasters took the newspapers from the bags and detained them until next trip — often a week — that they might read them. In 1827 the publishers of the In- diana Journal complained that half their papers were so detained. At the same time the editor explained that he had is- sued no paper the previous week because the mails from Cincinnati had been delayed two weeks by high waters. There were at that time thirty routes in the State. Nearly all were weekly. On one the mail left Lawrenceburg at two p. m. Monday and arrived at Indianapolis at six p. m. Wednesday. This was a fair example of the service. "Franked" congressional documents often clogged the mails to the exclusion of more important matter. Captain ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 273 Sample, the postmaster at Connersville in 1828, complained that he had over a wagon load of this material, nearly all franked by T. P. Moore, a congressman from Kentucky, to Jonathan McCarty — the Jacksonian candidate for Congress in that district. The postal receipts during the year 1828 for Indianapo- lis were $379 ; Brookville, $142 ; Crawf ordsviFle, $139 ; Fort Wayne, S158 ; Terre Haute, $235 ; Madison, $323. For the whole State it was $7,905. There were then one hundred and forty-nine offices in the State, thirty-seven of which had been established that year.-^-^ The development, how- ever, was rapid. At the beginning of 1830 Indianapolis had a weekly mail to Madison, Louisville, Elizabethtown, Ky., Petersburg, Terre Haute, Mooresville, Noblesville, Lawrenceburg. and twice a week to Brookville, and to Day- ton.^^^ § 54 Settlement of the Wabash Country No description can give an accurate impression of the settlement of Indiana. One who has watched the rising waters of a flood overflow the land will appreciate the over- flow of the State by the swelling tide of immigration. By 1825 the settlers were entei'ing the northern half of the State. The "New Purchase" in 1818 opened almost all the land south of the Wabash to settlement. As noted in the last chapter, land sales at Crawfords- ville had been opened by Ambrose Whitlock and William- son Dunn December 24, 1824, though there was no per- manent land office established there till 1828.''' Crawfordsville became the converging point for all set- tlers northwest of the capital. The first settlers of Lafay- ^^Amerivan State Pupcrs. Poxt Office. I, 208. S4 Indiana Journal, .Tau. 16. 1830. In 1832 tlie South Bend North Western Pioneer announced witli great pride tliat South Bend had a twice-a-week mail from Piqua, Ohio. Before that a weel^ly mail from Fort Wayne had been suflicient; cf. Waldo Mitchell. '"Growth of Indiana. 1812-1820." Indiana Magazine of Histori/, Dec. 1914. where a number of the early routes are given. 35 Sanford C. Cox, Recollections of the IJiuiii fiettleinent of the ^Ya- bash Yalley, 17. 274 HISTORY OF INDIANA ette and Delphi, and what was then called the upper Wa- bash country, made their way from the upper Whitewater Valley across by Andersontown, thence down White river to Strawtown near Noblesville. There they took the Wil- derness road by Thorntown to Crawfordsville. From White river to Crawfordsville there was not a white man's house along this trace in 1825.^'^ A score of families constituted the little settlement at Crawfordsville and then the forest stretched unbroken to Terre Haute. Along this trace, in October, 1824, came Sanford Cox, his father, mother, brothers and sisters, among the first to reach the Wabash country by this overland route. The Robinson family, Henry and his sons, Abner and Coleman, their wives and children, from Dayton, Ohio, had preceded the Coxes by only a few days. At Crawfordsville they se- lected their land, and cut a trace for their wagon into Car- roll county, the earliest settlers in the vicinity of Delphi. ■^'" The whole country to the northwest of Montgomery county was then known as Wabash county and was at- tached to Montgomery for administrative purposes. Early in the spring of 1825 Robert Johnson, the tavern keeper of Crawfordsville, surveyed for William Digby the town site for Lafayette. In January, 1828, Tippecanoe county was set off by the General Assembly and in May following the commissioners located the county seat at Lafayette. ■'^^ Almost at the same time, March 28, 1826, John Tipton moved the Fort Wayne Indian Agency to the mouth of Eel river. April 16, 1828, the town site of Logansport was sur- 36 "Soou after crossing White river wo iiassed BeckwitLi's place. 3.1r. Ogle, who drove the (ox) team told us to take a good look at that cabin as it was the last we would see for forty miles." Sanford Cox. Recol- lections, 11. ■"7 Dr. .James Hervey Stewart. h'cc'iJIrclions of the Early fiettleincnt of Carroll County, 1.3. 38 Dr. E. V. Shockley. in an article entitled "County Seats and Coun- ty Seat Wars," Indiana Magazine of History, March. 1914. has gi\eu the location of the different county seats of the counties of Indiana, showing the time, manner, and inducements, that led up to them. In the case of Lafayette the proprietor gave the even numbered lots to the county as a price for the location. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 275 veyed, and August 12, 1829, it became the county seat of Cass county.'^" Fort Wayne had been the seat of a military post or Indian agency for nearly a century before any real settle- ment was made. In 1822 a land office was established there under charge of Joseph Holman and Samuel C. Vance. The first land sale was opened at the fort, October 22, 1823. Squatters and traders, such as Samuel Hanna, James Bar- nett, Alexander Ewing, Samuel Comparet and others, had already settled there. The General Assembly of 1823 laid out Alien county, the county seat being located the follow- ing year at Fort Wayne.^^^ As early as 1823 Alexis Coquillard, a fur trader, estab- lished a station where the city of South Bend now stands. Lathrop Taylor soon followed. The station was an outpost of Fort Wayne. Real settlers soon followed and by the time the Michigan Road reached the place a considerable settle- ment had sprung up.^' Settlers entered Lake county by way of Lake Michigan and the "Old Sac Trail." The Indian title to this section was not secured till 1828 and 1832. The Black Hawk War in the latter year scared away prospective settlers, but in 1833 a stage line from Detroit to Fort Dearborn, passing through, opened up the country to settlement. It is thought that the first settlement in the region was made by a tavern keeper named Bennett, who located his hostelry near the mouth of the Calumet. Traces ran from Laporte to Hickory creek, Illinois, passing Cedar Lake. This latter was called the "Old Sac Trail."-'-^ Settlers had established homes on the prairies about Laporte as early as 1830, there being about 100 families in that neighborhood by the close of 1832, when Laporte county was organized. ^•'• These settlements indicate the main lines of immigra- ■ 39 "w. Swift Wright. Pastime Sketches. This is a series of articles written for, and read to the Cass County Historical Society. 40 Wallace A. Brice, History of F'ort Wayne, 29.3. 41 Judge Timothy E. Howard, A History of St. Joseph County, 132. 42 Rev. T. H. Ball, Lake County, Indiana, 20. 43 Gen. Jasper Packard, History of LaPorte County, .36. 276 HISTORY OF INDIANA tion, but only the main lines. Thousands came up the Wa- bash ; others came by trail to the Wabash from Lake Michi- gan, a harbor having been made on the Indiana shore as early as 1834.^^ "Nothing is more common," wrote Rev, George Bush, of Indianapolis, November 20, 1826, "than to see fifteen or twenty w^agons passing in a single day, each carrying the little belongings of the family that trudged along by its side. Indiana is now teeming with the hordes of immigra- tion. As many as thirty wagons camp together for the night."^-^ "For a week our town has scarce been clear of immi- grant wagons," wrote the editor of the Indiana Gazette, of Indianapolis, October 30, 1827.^'' It was reported that 200 families passed through Centerville for the Wabash count- try during the two months of September and October, 1827. Since 1820 there had been organized in the "New Purchase" twenty-one counties whose population in 1827 totaled 55,- 000.^' There was no cessation in this rush of settlers. Dur- ing the years from 1829 to 1835 the flood poured along the roads that centered in Indianapolis. From there they took the Crawfordsville, Logansport, or Terre Haute trails. The canal agitation, which began in 1827, quickened the move- ment and swelled the crowd. Sales of canal lands all along the route attracted speculators, city builders, and settlers in ever increasing numJoers. Cities like Lagro, Peru, Mia- misport, Pittsburg, Logansport, Lockport, Lafayette, Wil- liamsport, Eugene, Attica and Covington sprang up in a season and became flourishing towns. ^"^ 4-1 JiididiKt -I (III nidi. .TriU. IS, is:^4. 45 Rev. (ieorjie Bush, to Corres])oii(lin.g Secretary of the Home Mis- sion Society, Indiana Gazette, April 3, 1.S27. "Tlieir destination is the Wabash above Terre Haute. We wonder wh.v a merciful providence kept this country hid from civilized man. or why he did not create an espe- cially gifted race for its occupation." •I't; Indiana Gazette, Oct. 30. 1827. 47 Western 8un. Nov. 10, 1S27. 48 Paoli Patriot, Oct. 9. 1S34. "We presume not less than one hun- dred and tift.v wagons have passeii through this village in the last two AA'eeks." Indianapolis Indiana Detnocrat. "Our streets are one moving mass of living men. women, and children, carriages. w;!gons. cattle. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 277 The bulk of population, as shown by the census of 1830, was still in the southern part of the State, The White- water Valley was most thickly settled. Wayne county, with a population of 18,589; Dearborn, with 13,955; Jefferson, with 11,465 ; Franklin, with 10,719, were the leading coun- ties. The immense throng of settlers, then crowding to the Wabash frontier, passed through these counties and thou- sands became permanent residents, who had intended to go to the Wabash.49 Another large body of population was located, roughly speaking, in the triangle of hilly country with its base resting on the Ohio from Madison to Leavenworth and its apex at Crawfordsvilie. Most of these settlers had entered through Clark county, which then contained 10,719 persons. As an evidence of the heavy immigration into the Wa- bash country, Tippecanoe county had a population of 7,167 ; Fountain had 7,644, either equal to that of Marion, with 7,181, or Montgomery, with 7,386.-5o horses, hogs ;ind sheep, all joyously wentliug their way to their new habitations. The old, middle aged, and young go together. Nor is this moving spirit confined to one part of our State alone, but we believe tens of thousands are going by the lakes, and every leading road abounds with similar trains of emigrants." The Indiana Journal, Sept. 8, 1830, called attention to the heavy immigration then pouring through Indi.-ui- apolis. The capital that year had a population of 1,09-1 ; Viucennes 1,560 : Salem 853; Madison 1,752. The newspapers were filled with the adver- tisements of towns. Andersontown, Knightstown, Muncytown 1827, Del- phi 1828, Blakesbury. Brentonville, Marion, .Alooresville 1830, Lebanon. New Maysville, South Bend. LaPorte 1832, Michigan City, Allisonvillo 1833, New Bethel, ilonticello, Plymouth. Germantovvn, Northfield, Peru 1834, will give some idea how fast these towns were laid out and placed on the markets. The date given is the first advertisement for the s-ile of lots. There were scores of towns laid out and advertised which can not now be located on the map. -t^Dr. James Hervey Stewart, Recollections of the Early Settlement of Carroll County, 12, "On passing through Richmond and Centerville we were annoyed by croaking predictions of ill-luck uttered on all sides. 'You will never get through' said one, 'You will die if you go to the Wabash: every one that goes there dies in less than ;i year,' said an- other." 50 Fcroy Messenger, Sept. 27. 18.31. gave the following census report of Indiana for 1830 : County. Census. County. Census. (Jounty. Census. Allen 1,000 Clark 10.719 Carroll 1.614 Bartholomew — 5.480 Crawford 3,234 Clay 1,616 (19) 278 HISTORY OF INDIANA County. Census. Booue 622 Dearborn 13.955 Decatur 5.851 Delaware 2,372 Daviess 4,512 Dubois 1.774 Elkhart — 935 Franklin 10,990 Fayette 9,112 Fountain 7.644 Floyd 9,368 Gibson 5,417 Greene 4,253 Hancock 1,569 Harrison 10,088 Hendricks 3,667 Henry 6,498 Hamilton 1,750 Jefferson 11,465 County. Census. Clinton 1,423 Jackson 4.894 Johnson 4.139 Jennings 3,950 Knox 6,557 Lawrence 9,239 Martin 2,010 Madison 2.242 Marion 7,181 Montgomery 7,386 Morgan 579 Monroe 5,678 Orange 5,909 Owen 7,090 Posey 4,883 Perry 6.378 Putnam 8,495 Pike 2,464 Parke 7,534 County. Census. Cass 1,154 Rush 9,918 Ripley 3,959 Randolph 3,912 Sullivan 4,696 St. Joseiih 287 Switzerland 7,111 Scott 3,097 Spencer 3,187 Shelby 6,294 Tippecanoe 7,167 Union 7,957 Vanderburgh __ 2,610 Vigo 5,736 Vermillion 5.706 Washington Warren 2,854 Warrick 2,973 Wayne 18,589 Total 344,508 CHAPTER XII religion and education in early indiana § 55 Churches There was periodical preaching among the Indiana set- tlers from the earliest years of the nineteenth century. The log houses and barns of the settlers were used as meeting houses. Occasionally a rough pulpit was erected in the grove and more or less regular services held in the shade of the trees. Itinerant priests and preachers were pressed into service. Many of these were merely accidental visitors, others were traveling under the direction of eastern mis- sionary societies. The earliest church organization in Indiana was the Catholic at Vincennes. The records of this parish church date back to 1749. From this date to 1834, when Bishop Gabriel Brute became the bishop of Vincennes, thirty priests had served in succession. The earlier priests, particularly Bishop Flaget, had traveled over Indiana, ministering to the Catholic settlers, revalidating marriages, administering sacraments, and receiving converts into communion. Only traditional evidence remains of the ministrations of this clergyman.^ With the appointment of Bishop Brute, Vincennes, which had formerly belonged to the diocese of Bardstown, Kentucky, became an independent see. His jurisdiction in- cluded Indiana and much of Illinois. As soon as the new St. Francis Xavier cathedral church at Vincennes was dedi- 1 Eev. Herman Alerding, A History of the Catholic Church in the Diocese of Vincennes, 92. In 1823 and again in 1825 Bishop Flaget traveled from New Albany to Vincennes holding church at such places as New Albany, the Knobs, Mt. Pleasant, Washington, and Black Oak Ridge. At Vincennes in an eight day meeting he securetl three hundred converts. 280 HISTORY OF INDIANA cated Bishop Brute and the resident priest, Lalumiere, started on a tour of the State.- The Catholic settlers were gathered into congregations at suitable places and priests sent them as soon as possible. Bishop Brute was a man of remarkable activity, and, by the time of his death, June 26, 1839, had the State well or- ganized." The first session of the Indiana Conference of the Metho- dist Episcopal Church was held at New Albany in 1832. There were represented in the conference five presiding elders' districts. These were Madison, Charlestown, Indi- anapolis, Vincennes, and the Missionary district covering the whole northern part of the State. ^ There were reported at this time 19,853 white members and 182 colored. There were sixty preachers appointed and four charges left un- supplied. These were under the direction of five presiding elders. There was scarcely a nook or corner of the State not reached by the famous circuit riders of this church. As early as 1804 Peter Cartwright and Benjamin Lakin, who were then riding the Shelby and Salt River Circuits in Kentucky, crossed over and preached in Clark's Grant. The principal gathering places of the early Methodists was at the home of the Robinsons and Prathers near Charlestown."^ Mr. Cartwright also organized the first Methodist church in southwestern Indiana, in the Busroe Settlement, about this time. These converts were organized into a class in 1808.6 Whitewater Circuit, in western Ohio, was organ- 2 In the Western Sun (Vincennes), March 4. 1826. is a notice by Father Chanipomier that the cornerstone of the new Cathedral Church would be laid March 30. Catholics and Protestants alike were invited and Protestants aided liberally in the work of construction. Nov. 6, following, the unfinished walls were thrown down by a violent wind. Indiana and Illinois then constituted the diocese. This was by far the finest church building in the State. 3 Alerding, A History of the Diocese of Vincennes. 121-161. The bishop was buried in the sanctuary of the Cathedral of Vincennes where his body still remains. 4 Rev. F. C. Holliday. Indiana Methodism, 75. 5 Nathan Robinson moved to Indiana from Kentucky in 1799 and was perhaps the pioneer Methodist of the State. Stevens. History of Methodism, IV, 152. 153 : Sweet, Indiana Magazine of History. Dec, 1914. 6 Peter Cartwright, Autobiography. RELIGION AND EDUCATION 281 ized in 1806, soon after, including among its charges Brookville, Liberty and Connersville, In 1807 the Silver Creek Circuit, in Clark county, was organized and placed under the charge of Rev. Moses AshworthJ In 1808 Indiana District was organized, including parts of Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, and Missouri. Among the noted preachers who devoted their lives to this work were Moses Crume, Josiah Crawford, Samuel Parker and William Wi- nans. The latter is said to have been the first Protestant preacher to visit Vincennes. On one of his early visits he preached in the fort to the officers, a few English and French settlers, and a small number of Indians. Governor Harrison held the candle, by the light of which he read his text.8 In 1816 the Western Conference, of which Indiana Cir- cuit had been a part, was broken and the Missouri Con- ference established. The Whitewater Valley was placed in the Ohio Conference and the rest of the State in the Mis- souri Conference. All told, there were seven circuits in the State at the time. In 1824 the Illinois Conference was established, to in- clude Illinois and Indiana. It held its first annual meeting at Charlestown, August 25, 1825. There were then four districts, with thirty-one circuits and stations. At the next meeting, which was held at Bloomington, September 28, 1826, the reports showed a membership in Indiana of 10,- 840. No other church grew so rapidly during the pioneer period. A succession of able preachers, such as Jay C. Smith,-' Allen Wiley,^'^ Peter Cartwright.^i John Schrader, Richard Hargrave, William Cravens and scores of others, left evidence of their power not only in the remarkable or- ganization of the church but on the political and educa- 7 F. C Holliday, Indiana Methodism, 26. SF. C. Holliday, Indiana Methodism, 28. ■ 9 Reminiscences of Early Methodism in Indiana, 1870. 10 Ufe and Times of Rev. Alien Wileii. by Rev. F. C. Holliday, 1853 ; Bketches of Western Methodism, by James B. Finley. 1856 ; Scenes in My Life. Rev. Mark Trafton. 1878. 11 AtttoMograpJnj of Peter Curtirright. {y 282 HISTORY OF INDIANA tional institutions of the State. Among early Methodist laymen were such as Dennis Pennington, Ezra Ferris, James Scott, Isaac Dunn. Unclean politics had headquarters at this time in the bar-rooms of the taverns. On these the Methodists made ceaseless war. On the other hand, many circuit riders preached regularly in bar-rooms, the tavern keeper main- taining excellent order during the time. It is said the first sermons heard in New Albany and Rising Sun were preached in bar-rooms. ^- The Baptist was the pioneer Protestant church in In- diana. The first church of this denomination was organ- ized at Owen's creek, near the Falls of the Ohio, in Knox county, November 22, 1798. There seems to have been four members. 1"' The congregation met either at Owen's creek, Fourteen Mile creek, or Silver creek. At the meeting of August 8, 1801, they chose delegates to the Salem, Ken- tucky, Association and thus became a regularly organized church. March 21, 1812, the allied churches of Silver Creek, Mount Pleasant, Fourteen Mile, Knob Creek, Indian Creek, Upper Blue River, Lower Blue River, Camp Creek, Salem, and White River formed the Silver Creek Association. ^^ However, this was not the first but the third association formed by this church in Indiana. The first had been or- ganized over at Vincennes in 1809, and had been named the Wabash. Besides a few Illinois congregations it included the Bethel, Patoka, Salem, Wabash, and the famous Maria Creek congregations in Indiana. The second Indiana association was an offshoot of the old Miami Association, and, taking its name from its own local Jordan, was called the Whitewater. Loughery Association was organized in 1818 ; White River in 1821 ; Flat Rock, Little Pigeon and Salem in 1822 ; Liberty and Union in 1824; Lost River in 1825; Indianapolis in 1826; Coffee Creek and Danville in 1827; Madison and Tippecanoe in 1833 ; Curry's Prairie in 1834 ; Brownstown and White Lick 12 F. C. HoUiday, Indiana Methodism, 98. 13 W. T. Stott. Indiana Bapti.H History, 37. 14 Indiana Baptist History, 77. RELIGION AND EDUCATION 283 in 1835; Northern in 1836; Bethel in 1837; Freedom and Salamonie in 1840; Northeastern in 1841; Bedford, 1842; Sand Creek, 1843 ; Judson, 1848 ; Evansville and Long Run, 1850; Whitewater Valley, 1852; Weasaw Creek, 1853; Mount Zion, 1855; Friendship, 1856; Indiana (colored), 1858. This list shows at a glance the heroic work these men and women were doing. By 1840 every part of the State was reached by their ministers. In April, 1833, representatives of twenty-one of these associations met at Brandywine church and organized the Indiana Baptist Association or Convention. Its purpose was to unite all the Baptist churches in Indiana and thus conform to the spirit of the time. No early church was more energetic than the Baptist until internal dissentions over such questions as the origin of evil, missions, educa- tion, and ceremonials in a measure disrupted the organiza- tion and dissipated its zeal and resources. Like the other Protestant churches, the Presbyterian made its entrance into Indiana from the neighboring charges in Kentucky. Members of the Kentucky churches were continually crossing the Ohio into Indiana. Nothing more natural than that the preachers would occasionally visit their former brethren on the north side of the river, or that the Transylvania Presbytery should retain an in- terest in its people in their new homes in the wilderness. As early as 1804 such preachers as Samuel Rannels, James McGready, Thomas Cleland and Samuel B. Robertson crossed over from their stations to visit old friends in Clark and Knox counties. i"' Even earlier, in 1803, Transyl- vania Presbytery, sitting at Danville, Kentucky, determined to send missionaries to Indiana. ^f' The records of the Pres- bytery show frequent applications by Indiana settlers for "supplies," as visiting preachers were called. One of these came to the presbytery, in 1805, from Knox county. In response Thomas Cleland visited Vincennes and preached in the Council house. The youthful preacher was enter- ic John M. Dickey. Brief History, 11. '^^ Minutes of Transylrama Presbytery. II. 72. 284 HISTORY OF INDIANA tained by Governor Harrison, whose young wife was a Presbyterian.^' Two years later Samuel Thornton Scott came to "In- diana" church as the first residing Presbyterian pastor in the State. This church had been organized in 1806 by Samuel B. Robertson. The meeting house was the barn of Colonel Small, two miles east of Vincennes. A short time later Mr. Scott had a pulpit built in the grove, and here at "the Presbyterian Stand" the Presbyterians of Vincennes and vicinity worshipped for many years. The life of such a preacher differed little from that of other pioneers except that on Sundays he preached and performed other official duties of the church. He received no salary worth mentioning for this, but had to depend on the produce of his farm and shop for a living. ^« In 1807 Palmyra church, near Charlestown, was organ- ized, but no resident preacher was stationed there till after the War of 1812. In fact this church did not take on a permanent organization till 1812. During the winter of 1812 and 1813 John McElroy Dickey visited the State, preaching in Clark and Daviess counties, a church near the present city of Washington having been organized a few years previously by Mr. Scott, of Vincennes. In May, 1815, Dickey moved to Washington and soon became the most active worker in the Presbyterian church of Indiana. For a third of a century "Father" Dickey traveled over south- ern Indiana, preaching and teaching and helping his wife incidentally to rear their eleven children. 1" "In the SpriiiiL; of 1805 I was directed to visit Vincennes r.nd the adjoining regions. It was an uninhabited region. I had to go through a small wilderness trace with only one residence on the way. in the most destitute part of the way, to entertain me during the night. Here was my poor horse tied to a tree, ied with grain packed in a wallet from Louisville, and myself stretched on the puncheon floor of a small cabin, for the nighfs rest." Cleland, Life of Cleland, 87. 18 There was a certain amount of kindliness shown the preacher, which was not expected by others. Hunters often sent a hind qitnrter of venison to the preacher, because he could not hunt on Sunday. Tavern keepers and ferrymen never charged him. When Robertson lost his hat and one boot swimming White river. Governor Harrison freely supplied the loss. These little aids largely compensated the preacher for his salary. RELIGION AND EDUCATION 285 In 1816 there came to Indiana a number of Presbyterian missionaries sent by the New England societies. As a rule these men accepted no regular charges but traveled over the State somewhat after the manner of the Methodist preach- ers. The most noted of these missionaries were Isaac Reedi-' and William W. Martin.-^" Until 1823 the Indiana churches belonged to the Louisville Presbytery. By an act of the Kentucky synod, October, 1823, most of the Indiana churches were organized into the Salem Presbyterj^, which held its first meeting April 1, 1824, at Salem.- ^ Within the next two years Madison and Wabash Presbyteries were added to the list. These, together with the Missouri Pres- bytery, were organized into the Indiana Synod, which met for the first time October 18, 1823, at Vincennes.-- This conference constituted the Presbyterian church in Indiana. The meetings for church organization v,^ere as truly State conventions as the meeting held at Corydon in 1816. The Christian (Disciples) Church had its origin in In- diana early in the nineteenth century. It was a result of the protest against creeds in the church. It gained its membership largely from the Baptist and the Dunkard so- cieties, though many Presbyterians and Methodists became members. It is impossible in many instances to tell at what point a Baptist church became a "New Light" and then a Disciple or Christian. John Wright, a Baptist of the Blue River, Washington county, church, is frequently given as the first Christian preacher of the State. He began his work as a "Reformer" in 1819. The Dunkards, then quite numerous in south cen- tral Indiana, joined the movement in large numbers — fif- teen churches joining in a body. The Blue River and Silver 19 Youth's Book. lu this Mr. Keed details a great many of his ex- periences as a missionary in Indiana. 20 Father of Dr. W. A. P. Martin. President of the Imperial Univer- sity of China. . 21 William Robinson. John Todd, Samuel T. Scott, William W. Mar- tin, John M. Dickey. John F. Crow and Isaac Reed were the members, all being present but the first. 22 Baynard R. Hall, TJie New Purchase, chs. 37, 38. The best treatise is Hanford A. Edson, Early Presbyterianism in Indiana. 286 HISTORY OF INDIANA Creek Associations of the Baptist church became almost entirely "New Light," and then Christian. Somewhat later, but independently, what were knov/n as the Calvinistic Baptist churches of Rush and Fayette counties, under the lead of John T. Thompson, became Christian. The Flat Rock Baptist congregation was the first to go over. Some of these were called "Reformers" and some "New Lights." Michael Combs, a "New Light" convert of Wayne coun- ty, moved to Montgomery county in 1826 and organized the new church in that section. Beginning with 1826, the teach- ing of Alexander Campbell reinforced the movement in In- diana. The Christian Baptist, the organ of the new church, circulated widely in the State. By 1840 the church was well organized and prosperous.-" Besides the regular work of the church many auxiliary societies were organized. At Charlestown, August 2, 1826, delegates met and established the Indiana Sabbath School Union. Preliminaries for this had been arranged at a meeting held in Charlestown in the preceding October. The purpose of this was the promotion of Bible study, especially among the children. The society established three depots, one at Madison, one at New Albany, and one at Indianapo- lis, where religious tracts, suitable for use in the Sunday schools, could be had. The Indiana Union was a branch of the American Sabbath School Union. ^^ The American Bible Society, organized in 1816, sent its agents into the State to organize auxiliary societies. In 1826 there were six such societies in Indiana. Their mis- sion was to supply Bibles to any one at cost, and to all who could not pay, they were given free. On the boards of 23 A good brief history of the origin of the ('hrisii;in Chnrch in In- diana is an article by liev. H. Cl.iy Trn.sty. of Indiannpolis, in the Indiana Magazine of IliMonj. VI. 17. For biographie-s of the leading pioneer preachers of this sect see M;idison Evjuis. Biographical Sketches of the Pioneer I'rcachers of Indiana. 1862: also files of Christian Record. 1843-1858. ^'i Indiana Journal, July S, 1826. For an account of the Indianapolis Sabbath School Society, established March 29. 182.3. see a four column anniversary report by its president Isaac Coe, Indiana Journal, April 10. 1827. RELIGION AND EDUCATION 287 these societies were found the most substantial citizens of the day. One of their Bibles not infrequently made up the library of a pioneer family.-^- In 1832 M. Fairfield, agent for Indiana, reported that he had visited forty counties and given away about $15,000 worth of Bibles.-'' Closely allied with the church was the Indiana Temper- ance Society — organized December 9, 1830.-" There were twenty-five subordinate societies in the State. Each of these sent delegates to the State meeting held at the capital every winter while the General Assembly was in session. Bethuel F. Morris was its first president. In close connection vv^ith the above was the Anti-Gam- bling Society, organized at Indianapolis June, 1834, with branches in the principal towns of the State. Isaac Coe, Superintendent of the Indianapolis Sabbath School, was the leader in this movement. Its purpose was to rid the State of the professional gamblers. The success of this society is a proof that Indiana had passed the pioneer period.-"^ The Indiana Colonization Society was organized at In- dianapolis November 4, 1829.--* Like its kindred societies, it was State wide, composed of small local subordinate so- cieties in the various counties. It collected, chiefly through the churches, money to pay the expense of sending free negroes to Liberia. Mr. Findley, the society's agent, re- ported that he had a band of eighty liberated negroes ready at the time of the second anniversary meeting to go to 25 Indiana Journal, Noveaiber 24, 1826 : ibid Misy 12. 1830 26 Indiana Journal, April 7. 1832. 27 Indiana Journal, Dec. 3, 1829: Dec. 16, 1829; Jan. 10, 1832. "When treated by medical writers and arranged according to its effects on the human body, distilled spirits is placed in the same class with hemlock, opium and various other poisons." After enumerating the effects of liquor as a producer of crime, the report adds: "In all this outline of misery the countless woes arising from understandings blinded, con- sciences seared, and hearts hardened are not enumerated." First annual report, by Secretary J. M. Ray, cashier of the Indiana State Bank. ■^^ Indiana Journal, June 21, 1834: and Aug. 14, 1835. The society furnished evidence to grand juries and legal aid to prosecutors. 29 Judge Jesse L. Holman presided over this meeting. The other members of the State Supreme Court were active members. Indianap- olis Gazette, Nov. 12, 1829. 288 HISTORY OF INDIANA Liberia. The leading officers of the State were connected with this society, which enjoyed a long and worthy career.^*^ There was considerable effort put forth during the period from 1825 to 1840 toward improved agriculture. Centers of this work were Wayne, Washington and Marion counties, in each of which a county society was formed. An agricultural journal made its appearance also in each county. This work was summed up in the law of Febru- ary 7, 1835, providing for a county society in each county affiliated with the State society."^ County fairs were held, at which all the various lines of agricultural produce were shown. The greatest good came from the association of farmers and the resulting discussion. Farmers' picnics were held in the groves, where clever handiwork was in- spected or addresses by prominent farmers listened to. By ■ this time the early settlers had succeeded in clearing up suitable farms and were beginning to enioy a small amount of leisure. Their first thoughts were naturally turned toward relief from their hard life. As a result many of the hardships of pioneer life disappeared.^- In the Indianapolis papers, December 8, 1830, appeared a card calling for a meeting of all citizens interested in forming a State Historical Society.-'^ The society was or- ganized December 11, with Judge Benjamin Parke as the first president. Its stated purpose was to collect and pre- serve the documents of our history and besides to establish 30 Indiana Sentinel, Jan. 7. 1832. The second annual report by J. M. Ray is given. Closely akin to tbis was tlie society organized in Indian- apolis during the winter of 1834 for tbe promotion of universal peace. A public lecture on tbe evils of war was provided for each winter while the legislature was in session. Indiana JonrnaJ, Jan. 1, 1834. 31 Latcs of Indiana, 1834. ^2 Indiana Journal, May 15, 1835. The State Board at its iinnual meeting, April 28, offered premiums for the best essays on (1) best U'- breeds of cattle, (2) horticulture. (3) vine culture. (4) mulberry cul- ture, (5) growing of live fences (hedges), (6) vegetable physiology. ss Indiana Journal, Dec. 8, 1830. "The members of the General Assembly, the members of the Supreme and Circuit Courts, the Rever- end Clergy, Gentlemen of the Bar, Physicians and Citizens, generally, are requested to meet at the Court House on Saturday evening next at 11 o'clock for the purpose of taking into consideration the expe- diency of establishing and organizing an Historical Society for the State of Indiana." RELIGION AND EDUCATION 289 a museum in which the relics might be kept for show.^^ The General Assembly later provided that the society should be furnished with duplicate copies of all papers and books printed by the State. However, no permanent home was ever provided and the work so well begun was not kept up. The large and priceless collection was loaned and lost until at present the society, though still alive, has no library at all.35 § 56 Education Unfortunately the high hopes of the first settlers of Indiana for the foundation of a common school system were not realized. The constitution directed the General Assem- bly to provide for a complete system of schools, "ascending in regular gradation from township schools to a State Uni- versity."^*^ This ambitious program was destined to re- main a dead letter for almost a century. There vv^as no system and very few schools in Indiana before the Civil War. The constitutional provision remained little more than the expression of an ideal. The enabling act of 1816 gave to the citizens of each congressional township section sixteen of the public land. Each section was worth about $2 per acre, or $1,280. The gift, unfortunately, was not to the State but to the citizens. There was thus entailed on the government one of the worst features of a decentralized school system. Some sections of school land were valuable, others worthless. The principal result of the gift was that it continually held out a hope of education to the citizens where no realization could follow. A law of 1816 permitted the citizens of a congressional township to elect three school trustees to administer the 34 See the (Constitution, Indiana Journal, Dec. 15, 1830. Three judges of the Supreme Court and two future governors, Whitcomb and Wallace, were on the committee that drew up the Constitution. Dr. Andrew Wiley president of the Indiana College, delivered the first annual ad- dress Dec. 10, 1831. 35 The society was incorporated Jan. 10, 1831. In the first 65 pages of Vol. I of the Proceedings are the minutes of the society during the first 56 years of its existence. These are fragmentary and worthless. They show, however, that there has always been alive among our citi- zens some appreciation of the Suite's history. 36 Constitution of Indiana, Art. IX, sec. 2. 290 HISTORY OF INDIANA funds. The law of 1824 incorporated the congressional townships, giving the trustees limited power to lease or sell school lands. The trustees might also divide the township into districts, over each of which they could appoint three sub-trustees. These district officers were authorized to lo- cate and build houses, determine the length of the term and the method of payment of the tuition tax, provided any were levied. Books, discipline, course of study, and even meth- ods of instruction were left to the district trustees. Malad- ministration and neglect are the chief features in the his- tory of the schools under this law. After 1833 the district trustees were elected by the qualified voters of the district. In 1836 any individual might hire a teacher and draw his part of the school fund for maintenance. There was only one more step that could be taken, and this was taken in 1841, when the qualifications of the teacher were left to the district trustees. It is not strange that under these circumstances the teaching profession disappeared. Men of high education and of great power filled the ranks of the preachers and lawyers, but the teacher of this period was not uncommonly the laughing stock of the neighborhood. While other institutions of the State were taking on effi- cient. State-wide organization, the schools, under the dom- ination of the ruinous idea of local self-government, were struggling hopelessly with unequal lengths of terms, in- capable teachers, dishonest trustees, diversity of text-books, lax enforcement of school laws and school discipline, neigh- borhood quarrels over school sites, narrow views of educa- tion, and lack of wise leadership. This situation lasted until the revision of the school law of 1843. The latter date perhaps marks the lowest level of general intelligence ever reached in the State. The harmful effects of the failure to organize were felt in all classes and fields of social life.^^ 37 The best discussion of this phase of early education is by Dr. W. A. Rawles, Centralizing Tendencies in the Administration of Indiana, 1903. See also R. G. Boone, History of Education in Indiana; Laws of Indiana, 1816, 1818, 1827, 1833. 1834, 1840. House Journal. 1839 ; Senate Journal, 1825 ; Decumentary Journal, 1841. By 1840 the leading men of the State recognized the complete failure of the schools. Governor RELIGION AND EDUCATION 291 Despairing of any relief from the public schools, the churches had, each in its way, tried to solve the problem of popular education. Almost every preacher was a school teacher. The Catholics had a large number of fairly good schools, at which not only their own, but Protestant children received instruction. Hundreds of private subscription schools were founded and continued for uncertain periods.' Such schools depended so completely on the teacher and local conditions that no history of them can be written. Any native of the State, past the age of seventy, can de- scribe a pioneer school ; no one can describe the pioneer schools. Higher education fared better in early Indiana than did the common schools. A law of 1806 provided for an uni- versity at Vincennes. The national government endowed the institution with a township of land. A distinguished board of trustees did all that was possible to support the institution but after a fitful life as college and seminary it became dormant and its endowment was taken for the pres- ent State University. The constitution of 1816 provided that after four years the General Assembly should establish a State Seminary. In pursuance of this, an act was approved January 20, 1820, under which a board of trustees organized the State Seminary at Bloomington.-'^ The General Assembly, in Bigger, iu his message, 1S42. said "Our schools are a mass of statutory provisions, presenting difficulties even to the legally discii)lined mind, which are almost insuperable to the ordiua.ry citizen." The House Com- mittee on Education, 1840, reported : "We present almost the only ex- ample of a State professing to have in force a system of common school education, which does not know the amount or condition of its school funds, the number of schools and scholars to be taught and to receive the distribution of those funds. It is a body without a head." House Journal, 1840, 393. See also the .Judiciary Report, House Journal, 1840, 963. 38 This board consisted of .Judge Charles Dewey, Jonathan IJndley, David H. Maxwell. John M. Jenkins, Jonathan Nichols and William JjQwe. Indiana Journal. Mar. 15, 1825, contains a notice of the opening of the State Seminary at Bloomington. Trustees will open it first Mon- day in April. 1825. Rev, Baynard R. Hall is the superintendent and faculty. Tuition, $5 per year. Good board can be had for $1.25 per week. The institution will be classical and each student must have following books: Ross" Latin Grammar; Valpy's Greek Gramtmar; Col- 292 HISTORY OF INDIANA 1822, sold the seminary lands in Gibson county, belonging to Vincennes University, and turned the proceeds over to the new State Seminary. In 1828 the State Seminary became Indiana College, under a board of fifteen trustees. In 1838 Indiana College became Indiana University. Its history for a half century is a continuous struggle for money, and students, to keep it alive. Its graduating classes before the Civil War rarely numbered a dozen and more often fell below a half dozen. The torch of learning was kept burning, however, and that is more than was done in neighboring States."'" The intense religious feeling of the times interfered with any united effort in higher education. Hardly had the State University been organized when a clerical quarrel began over its control. This was most unfortunate for the uni- versity. Feeling that they were not fairly represented on the board or the faculty of the State University, the Metho- dists v/ithdrew their support and by 1840 Indiana Asbury University vv^as open for students.^" The Baptists, as early as 1834, began an agitation for a college under their own control. As a result of this Frank- lin College was located in 1835. In its early years it passed through much of the same vicissitudes as the other Indiana pioneer schools,^ ^ The Presbyterians of Salem Presbytery, as early as 1825, took up the matter of establishing an academy. John Finley Crow was then maintaining a boarding school at South Hanover. In 1826 the presbytery arranged with Mr. Crow to enlarge his school, as soon as possible, into a classi- loquics of Gorderiufi ; TeKtniitent : Sclcctiw c ^'el•tel^i: (li-accd Minora; Selectae e i'rofanis; Caesar; VirijU. Must linve no ponies. Trustees, Joshua O. Howe. S.unuel Dodds. John Ketcham. William Lowe, Jona- than Nichols, D. H. Maxwell. Cf. Baynard R. Hall, TJie New Purchase. 39 T. A. Wylie. Indiana University, 1890; Indiana Alumni Quarterly, I. 40 F. C. HoUiday. Indiana Methodism, 317. The Methodists estab- lished the New Albany Seminary in 1837 ; Whitewater College, at Cen- terville; Fort Wayne College, 1846; Brookville College, 1851; Moore's Hill College, 1853.' 41 William T. Stott. Indiana Baptist Ilistori/. 346; see also a His- tory of Franlcliri College. RELIGION AND EDUCATION 293 cal school where boys and young men might prepare for college, and thus for the ministry. This school was formal- ly opened in a log house January 1, 1827. The usual strug- gle followed. Like its predecessor at Bloomington, about all that can be said of it during the next quarter of a century is that it survived.^- The Catholics were the earliest and also the latest to found denominational colleges in this period. The institu- tions at Vincennes date back to the early years of the State's history but none of them ever gave promise of becoming a first class college or university. Father Sorin, a member of the Congregation of the Holy Cross of Mans, France, understock to supply the needs of the northwestern Catho- lics in this respect. He reported to Bishop Hailandiere, of Vincennes, as a missionary in 1841. His first work was at St. Peters, a small missionary station in Daviess county. Here the college would have been located had it not been for the college at Vincennes. At the suggestion of Hailan- diere, the little band from Daviess county repaired to the present site of Notre Dame du Lac, on the banks of the St. Joseph, and there, in the winter of 1842 and 1843, was founded the present college.'*^ There is no intention here of attempting a history of any of these colleges. The purpose is to illustrate the effort of the pioneers of Indiana to solve the problem of education after the State had failed. Had the State University been properly supported, and had it freed itself from the re- proach of sectarianism earlier, it is conceivable that it might have gathered together all these factors and welded them into a large and prosperous school. More probably the day of the great State university had not yet come. Between these extremes, the college and the common school, there was no direct connection. Effort was made, however, both by public and private means, to bridge over this gap in the imaginary school system of Indiana. Be- 42 Hanford A. Edson, Early Indiana Preshyterianism, 22S: see iilso History of Hanover College. 43 A Brief History of the University of Notre Dame du Lac, 1895. (20) 294 HISTORY OF INDIANA ginning with the constitution itself ^^^ which provided for a system of intermediate schools, and extending through a series of statutes down till 1840, the State tried to estab- lish seminaries in each county. Besides the general laws, which authorized any county under certain conditions to establish a seminary, thirty-two special laws incorporated as many county seminaries between 1825 and 1843. Two sources of revenue were provided. All fines for breaches of the penal laws went to the seminary fund. The other source was private donations. Under the general law of 1831 no county could establish a seminary until it had a fund of $400. There was no uniformity in the management, course of study, length of term, method of instruction, text books, or any other material consideration connected with these sem- inaries. Like the common schools, while most of the sem- inaries were of no value, some rendered long and meritor- ious service to the community. Lack of friends, dishonest trustees and factional quarrels make up the burden of their history. ^-"^ The practice of medicine was considered a fit subject for legislation by the First General Assembly of the State. The circuit court districts were made medical districts, in each of which a board of censors was named. This board had power to examine and license any prospective physician it deemed well enough skilled to undertake the active practice. The usual way of preparing for these examinations was by "reading" medicine with some doctor, preferably a member of the board of censors, for a number of years. Persons refused a license were not thereby refused the right to prac- tice but such persons were unable to collect their fees by law. Each board had to report annually to the president of the State Senate. A significant provision of this law forbade any physi- cian charging a patient more than twelve and one-half cents 44 Constitution of 1816, Art. X. sec. 3. 45 A seminiiry paper by Walter .Jaclison Walvetielcl is the best stncly that has been made of these schools. RELIGION AND EDUCATION 295 per mile for the distance necessarily traveled. This fee might be doubled if the trip were made at night.*^ The General Assembly of 1825 revised the law concern- ing medical societies, establishing the State Medical Society, composed of delegates from each district society. The dis- trict censors still retained the right to license candidates, but if a candidate were refused he had the privilege of ap- pealing to the State society. The latter body was also di- rected to establish a "Uniform system of the course and time of medical study, and the qualifications necessary for license."^' In its general features this law remained until 1843, when it was omitted from the Revision of that year.^^ 46 Laws of Indiana, 1816, 161. 4T Laws of Indiana, 1825, 40. 48 W. A. Rawles, Centralizing Tendencies in the Administration of Indiana, 234. CHAPTER XIII politics from 1825 to 1840 § 57 The Jacksonian Party From the beginning of the territorial government, in 1800, there had been more or less political rivalry between the eastern and western settlers. It was first noticeable be- tween the settlers of Vincennes and those of Clark's Grant. Later it appeared between the settlers of the Whitewater Valley and those of the Wabash. With the adoption of the constitution in 1816 this rivalry began to disappear. A part of that hostility had been due to the belief by the eastern settlers that the territorial officers at Vincennes had too much authority. After Jonathan Jennings, of Clark coun- ty, became governor, William Hendricks, of Jefferson, con- gressman, and James Noble, of Franklin, senator, a similar complaint was heard from Vincennes. It was charged that everything was decided by a caucus of office holders at Corydon or Indianapolis. By 1824 the old Congressional Caucus at Washington was regarded with suspicion by the western democrats. The methods of Governor Jennings and his followers were said to be very much like those at Washington. ^ It was customary at this time for a number of leading members of the General Assembly, together with the gov- ernor and a few other State officers, to meet about the close of the annual legislative session and lay their political plans for the coming year. At a meeting of this kind Adams presidential electors had been chosen early in the year 1824. The electors were the three judges of the supreme court, the ex-lieutenant governor, and the Speaker of the House 1 Western Sim, Mar. 29. 1S17. POLITICS 297 of Representatives, all members of the officeholding aris- tocracy, as was charged at the time. Along with the opposition to the caucus the question of the relation of a representative to his constituents was widely discussed. The same party that opposed the cau- cus demanded that the representatives either in Congress or the General Assembly should vote as his constituents wished him to, and not as he thought individually. If unable to carry out the will of his supporters, the representatives should resign. This was called the "right of instruction."^ Another source of political unrest was the growing be- lief among the farmers that a class of professional office- holders was in charge of the State government. There was considerable ground for the charge. The men who made the constitution administered it until about 1829, when the Jacksonian Revolution turned them out.^ The same class of farmers that opposed the office-hold- ers in the caucus opposed the banks. The failure of the First State Bank strengthened this party materially. Those farmers and merchants able to load a flatboat for the down river trade were now frequently called the traders. In their 2 111 Nov., 1820. Enoch D. John and Joseph Hann.i. members elect from Franklin county to the General Assembly, sent out a hand bill calling their constituents into convention for the purpose of framing instructions to guide their course in the Assembly soon to meet. The editor of the Vincennes Centincl, a government organ, remarked editor- ially : "We do not think highly of this mode of legislation. If members are not fit for their station all the wit of their constituents cannot make them so, in so short a time. "We might as well send our instructions on pack horses." 3 Western Sun, March 29, 1S17. Sixteen out of the forty-two mem- bers of the constitutional convention returned to the first session of the legislature. At least six more immediately accepted some office under the constitution. All told, the members sat for a total of 154 tei-ms, making an average, not counting those in administrative offices, of about four years' service in the General Assembly for each member. Consid- ering 36, the number of members of the first session, to have remained the size of the Assembly, there would have been an average attendance by the members of the convention of seventeen members, almost a ma- jority. Add to these the terms served by the members as governors, con- gressmen, senators, judges, and in the national service and one begins to realize that the offices were fairly monoix)lized by a small group of politicians. It is clearly not too much to say that they ruled the State during the period of 1816 to 1824. 298 HISTORY OF INDIANA homes there were some evidences of luxury brought from New Orleans. The poorer class of farmers were often called "yeomanry," a term they disliked at first, but one they be- came proud of under Jackson. The followers of Jackson were handicapped by lack of leaders, and means to carry on a campagin. Scarcely a member of the party held office. The election of John Q. Adams by the House of Repre- sentatives welded the dissatisfied democrats of Indiana into the Jacksonian Democratic Party. There was a fierceness in their resentment of the treatment of Jackson which was little short of warlike. They referred to the election of Adams as "the theft of the presidency." All believed that Clay had sold his influence to Adams for the appointment as Secretary of State, a bargain and sale of the government which they thought far more dangerous than Burr's Con- spiracy.^ As soon as the election of Adams was known in Indiana a real political party began to take form. At log-rollings, boat-loadings, and above all on muster days the agitation was kept up. Viewed in all lights and from any angle, Jack- son appeared to them their natural leader. He was a west- ern man, a pioneer democrat. Unlike Clay, he had refused to affiliate with the aristocratic congressmen from the east. The Indians were the greatest menace to the pioneer. He had driven them beyond the Mississippi. The English were the only national enemy. At New Orleans he had defeated their finest army, with the untrained battalions of pioneer militia. In all his successes he had preserved his sincerity and his modesty. In this he was held up as a contrast to Clay, the modern Esau. The Democratic campaign was pitched on a high plane. The nation was in danger of mon- archy, the west was entitled to a share in the government, the common man must assert his rights and, most important of all, Jackson must be vindicated. These were the planks of the platform. Like skillful soldiers, the Jacksonians began the battle by attacking and taking the outposts of the enemy, the 4 Western Sun, April 2. 1825. POLITICS 299 township, county and militia offices. These were largely in the hands of the Jacksonians by 1828. By that time also a county and tow^nship political organization had been com.- pleted. Seeing the drift of public opinion, one newspaper after another became Jacksonian.-^ Jackson had been nominated by the legislature of Ten- nessee in 1825 ; so that it was not necessary to hold a State convention in Indiana except to nominate electors. This convention, the second in the history of the State, was held at Indianapolis January 8, 1828.*' Regularly chosen dele- gates, thirty-seven in number, representing twenty coun- ties, were present. Nine members of the General Assem- bly, for counties not otherwise represented, were also made members. The significant thing about this convention was the po- litical organization it perfected. Beginning with the town- ship, it provided that the lister (our assessor) of property, when he made his annual visit in the spring, should note the political preference of each voter. This poll book was then turned over to the Vigilance Committee (our precinct committeemen), who reported the voters to the County Committee of Correspondence. The Committee of Vigilance divided the voters of the township into groups, and mem- bers of the committee visited each voter personally. The Vigilance Committee also raised funds, furnished tickets to the voters on election day, arranged for stump speakings, and on election day attended the polls. The Committee of Correspondence resembled our county Central Committee and looked after county politics. It also communicated with the Committee of General Superintendence, our State Cen- tral Committee." This convention adopted a platform fa- 5 Western Sun, Feb. 17. 1827. "TUe friends of General Jackson will be pleased to note that the cause is gaining strength in the State. With- in a few days the PaUadhim (Lawrenceburg). the Guest (of Vevay) and the Annotator (Salem) have come out for him. ^Western Sun, Jan. 26. 1828: Indiana Journal Jan. 9, 1828. "• Indiana State Journal, Jan. 9, 1828. The State Committee consisted of R. C. Newland, Eli W. Malott. John McMahan. Henry S. Handy, all of Washington county: Gen. John Carr, of Clark: William Hoggatt, of Orange; William Marshall, of Jackson: A. S, Burnett, of Floyd; John Milroy, of Lawrence; Nelson Lodge, of Jefferson; Elihu Stout, of Knox; 300 HISTORY OF INDIANA voring democracy as against Federalism, the American sys- tem of government as against the English, and the respon- sibility of public offices to the people. With this platform and this organization the Jacksonian party entered the campaign of 1828 to vindicate Jackson and reclaim the lib- erties to the people. It was this superb party organization that enabled the Jacksonian Democrats to carry nearly all the presidential elections in Indiana, though the State, on national issues was opposed to them. Opposed to the Jacksonians were the Adams and Clay men, who called themselves National or Jeffersonian Repub- licans. This party contained nearly all the experienced pol- iticians of the State, though it must be kept in mind that political lines were not so clear and strong as at present. Senator John Tipton was an influential politician of this period though it could hardly be said he belonged to either party. The same was true of Governors Jennings and Noble. The Adams, or Administration, men held their State convention at Indianapolis, January 12, 1828.'^ Of the fifty- seven delegates present all seem to have been office-holders and most of them were members of the General Assembly then in session. Forty-one of the fifty-six counties of the State v/ere represented. In looking over the list of dele- gates it would seem that all the leading men of the State belonged to this party. Such was the fact. State officers and men of State reputation belonged to this party, while county and township officers belonged to the other. The organization of the Clay-Adams Party was never close and complete like that of its opponent. It depended for success on the dignity of its members, the appeal of its platform, and the oratory of its stump speakers. In these latter two points it surpassed the Jacksonians. It was the champion of the tariff, internal improvements, and the William C. Keen, of Switzerland; Jacob B. I.owe. of Monroe: Da\id V. Culley. of Dearborn; Thomas Posey, of Harrison. At least six of these were editors. 8 Indiana Journal, Jan. 31, 1S28. POLITICS 301 All the northern part of the state still owned ty Indians Wabash Reservation Randolph CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS established by the aat Of January 3, 1822 Indiana in 1822. By B. V. Shockley. / 302 HISTORY OF INDIANA bank, all of which were favored issues among the early In- diana voters. The stump speakers of this party were elo- quent, and could hold their "large and respectable aud- iences" for three or four hours at a time discussing the is- sues. These parties have been described in some detail for the reason that they continued without change to divide the voters of Indiana down until the slavery issue broke them up. The Jackson men stood for a wider democracy, a more universal participation in the government bj^ the common people. They demanded a firmer control over their law- makers, a government more responsive to public opinion. They insisted on instructing their representatives and re- quired them to resign or carry out the instructions. They insisted on the government keeping out of business so far as possible, and not interfering with the affairs of the citi- zens. The Adams men believed in a representative govern- ment, in which the representative was left to his own in- dividual opinion as the guide to his political conduct. It was the duty of the voters to elect superior men to office and it was the duty of the latter to govern with justice and foresight. The clashings of these two sets of opinions, varied with endless personalities, made up the warp and woof of Indiana politics before the Civil War. Under the old constitution the State elections fvvero held on the first Monday in August. The governor served a term of three years, so that 1828 was the first time since 1816, when there was a State and national election the same year. Governor Ray, who had been elected in 1825 on an internal improvement platform, was a candidate for re- election. '^ In the organization of parties he had refused to take sides. He believed national politics should have no place in a State election. On this platform he had been !*J;inies Brown Ray was born in Jefferson county, Kentucky, Feb. 19, 1794. He studied law at Cincinnati and settled down to practice at Brookville. He had served one term in the house and two terms in the senate. He was a firm believer in the railroad and his favorite vision was Indianapolis with railroads radiating from it like spokes from a hub. He died of cholera at Cincinnati in 1848. POLITICS 303 elected in 1825 over Judge Isaac Blackford. He attempted to repeat the same tactics in 1828, but party lines were more closely drawn and it was decided by both parties to nominate opposing partisan candidates. This movement alarmed Governor Ray so much that he made a private agreement with the Jackson men that as soon as the elec- tion was over he would come out frankly for Jackson, stat- ing publicly that Jackson's letter in answer to an inquiry by the General Assembly had assured him that the Jackson men were all right on the tariff and internal improve- ments, i*^* Everything seemed to be sailing on smooth seas until the governor, in a speech at Brookville, where his neighbors were nearly all Adams men, severely denounced the Jackson men as a faction not fit to be entrusted with power. This was reported to the State chairman, Henry S. Handy, of Salem, who laid the whole agreement before the Jackson committee. The Jackson men promptly disavowed the gov- ernor and nominated Dr. I. T. Canby, of Madison, for gov- ernor. The newspapers ridiculed the governor, making his position almost unbearable. ^^ The election was so near at hand, however, that only a comparatively few voters learned of the double dealing, and the governor was re-elected by a substantial plurality over Dr. Canby and Harbin Moore, the Adams candidate.^- In the following presidential elec- tion, November, 1828, Jackson carried the State by a heavy majority. As soon as Jackson was inaugurated a reign of terror began among Indiana politicians such as has never been ex- perienced before or since. The execution of ofRce-holders began with the postmasters. It is doubtful if a single ^0 Indiana Journal, April 3. 182S. This issue of the paper has a copy of the joint resolution. Ray's four column letter to Jackson, and Jackson's answer. Also the famous Coleman letter of Jackson on the tariff. 11 Indiana Journal, July 10 and July 17, 1828, contains all the ma- terials on this matter; see Western Sun. July 19, 1828: Indiana Palla- dium, July 19, 1828. 12 The vote was: Ray, 15.141: Canby, 12.305: Moore. 10.904. In- diana Palladium, Dec. 13. 1828. 304 HISTORY OF INDIANA Adams man was left in a single office in Indiana. The United States marshals, district attorneys, registers and receivers of land offices, superintendents and bosses on the National Road, Indian agents, revenue collectors, and post- masters were all removed. Some of the postmasters re- ceived less than $5 per year, but they had to stand aside nevertheless. Every Jackson man appointed had been ac- tive in the campaign, so that the Jacksonian political or- ganization was composed for the next twenty years of the federal office-holders of the State. The people in general rather feared the result of the wholesale change, but it seems that the new officers were at least as capable as the old, and far more courteous. The ex- perience confirmed the Jacksonian pioneers in their opinion that office holding was not a business that required either extraordinary talents or blue blood. ^^ § 58 The Internal Improvements Party In local politics the Internal Improvements Party con- trolled the State by an overv/nelming majority. This party was not unevenly divided between the Jackson and Adams men. Two of its most prominent leaders were Samuel Judah of Vincennes, who wrote the Jackson platforms in 1824 and in 1828, and Noah Noble, the successful candidate for governor in 1831 and in 1834. It was charged that he had voted for Jackson. National politics, at least, did not control State elections as at present. In or- ganizing the General Assembly in 1829 J. F. D. Lanier, later the distinguished Whig banker of Madison, was made principal clerk unanimously, while Edward A. Hannegan, later the eloquent Democratic senator, was chosen enroll- ing clerk. 1^ The campaign for the governorship in 1831 was between Noah Noble and James G. Read, the former being success- ful by 2,791 majority.i^ Very little interest was taken in 13 Western Sun, May 30, June 16. June 20. July 11. Aug. 29, Sept. 12, Sept. 26, 1828, and the Indiana Journal, April 14. 1830, give long lists. 14 Indiana Journal. Dec. 8, 1829. 15 Noah Noble was a Virginian by birth, having been born in Clark POLITICS 305 the campaign. The vote shows little significance beyond tlie personal popularity of the two men. Both were Inter- nal Improvement men and both had supported Jackson, though Noble later became a Whig. The congressional cam- paign of this year showed the superiority of the Jacksonian organization over that of the Clay supporters. The former elected all three congressmen, though in two of the districts they were in a decided minority. They held regular con- ventions and nominated a single candidate, while in the Second District the Clay men had six candidates. Gen. John Carr, the Jacksonian candidate, was elected by 4,855 votes out of a total of 14,818 in the district. In the Third District Jonathan McCarty was elected by 6,243 votes out of a total vote of 14,639.i6 As soon as the campaign for the governorship was over the Jackson men, now calling themselves National Demo- crats, began active preparation for the approaching contest between Jackson and Clay. The defeat of Mr. Read alarmed them for their supremacy. They could not tell what effect the removals from office would have ; neither could they tell what influence the Second United States Bank would have with its fabulous wealth. The campaign would also have to be made against Henry Clay, a western man, and a most skillful politician, not to mention his power as a stump speaker. County conventions began in November and a State con- vention was called for December. The Clay men, under the name of National Republicans, and claiming to be the party of Jefferson, began their organization as soon as they learned the Democrats were at work. A series of county conventions, or mass meetings, was followed in each party county, Virginia, Jan. 15, 1794. While quite small, his parents eanie to Kentucky, crossing over to Indiana and settling at Brookville in 1816. His older brother was United States senator and his younger brother receiver of public moneys at the Brookville land office till 1826. While .moving the land office to Indianapolis that year his brother. Lazarus, died, and Noah succeeded him in the office. He had formerly been sheriff two terms and had served in the General Assembly. He held office al- most all his life. He died at his home in Indianapolis in 1844. He was a Whig, though not much of a partisan. 16 Madison RepuUican. Oct. 13, 1831. 306 HISTORY OF INDIANA by a State meeting in Indianapolis.^" The Whigs met in the Methodist church, forty-six delegates being present from twenty-nine counties. Delegates to the Baltimore Convention were chosen and a corresponding committee of one from each county selected. The Democrats met in the courthouse December 12. They adopted resolutions, pre- pared an address, endorsed Jackson, and nominated an elec- toral ticket. A third party appeared in the field in this campaign. Some time in November the Anti-Masons held a convention at Hanover and decided to take an active part in the ap- proaching election. Several newspapers were advocates of their cause and the leaders of the old parties were seri- ously concerned. The convention appointed a committee to ascertain the views of the candidates for the presidency. The committee addressed Clay on the subject and his an- swer had much to do with allaying the agitation. He pointed out to them that Masonry was strictly a non-po- litical organization like a church or school, and it would not be good practice on the part of candidates to drag such questions into politics. The movement in Indiana subsided as rapidly as it had arisen, though for several years the Masonic order was regarded with suspicion by the public in general. IS The national election of 1832 was a well-conducted con- test. The Jacksonian Democratic Party was thrown largely on the defensive. The two candidates, Clay and Jackson, appealed to the western pioneers. Clay had much the stronger platform and Jackson had much the better organi- zation. The Whigs held a State meeting or convention at Indianapolis, January 31, principally for the purpose of strengthening and perfecting their organization.^^ The weakness of their organization was that all the federal 17 Indiana Democrat, Sept. IT. 1831 : Nov. 5. 1831 ; Nov. 23. 1831. In- diana Journal, Nov. 5. 1831 : Nov. 12. 1831 : Dec. 14, 1831. i^s Indiana Journal, Dec. 3. 1831: ISIiles' Register 41: 2G0. The party had an electoral ticket in the field, but no returns available give any votes cast for it. The electoral ticket is given in the Vevay Messenger, Nov. 3, 1832. "i^^ Indiana Journal. Feb. 1. 1832. POLITICS 307 office holders were Democrats and thus had more time and better opportunity to meet the voters and talk politics. The Whig politician had to go and see the voters, while the voters had to go and see the Democratic politicians. The veto of the new charter for the United States Bank upset all party plans in the State. It was knovv^i in the west that Jackson was not an enthusiastic friend of the bank, but it was not expected that he would try to kill it. The newspapers and politicians of the State were at a loss to understand the President's motives. Some thought it was the result of an understanding between Jackson and the wealthy money lenders of the east whereby Jackson had agreed to put all paper money out of circulation so that the wealthy who held all the specie could loan it at a much higher rate of interest.-" Others were confident that it was a battle royal between the government and the greedy monopolists. The Democrats adroitly shifted the at- tack from the bank to "Nick Biddle," whose name was made a synonym for greed, usury, and high-handed spoliation. The smouldering hatred of the old Indiana note-shaving banks was also kindled to a blaze. On the whole, Indiana sustained Jackson's veto of the bank charter, though prac- tically all its public men opposed it. There was another veto, however, which could not be explained. A bill had been prepared and passed by Con- gress for opening the Wabash. The President had signed similar bills applying to the Tennessee river and to a river in Pennsylvania. The Indiana measure died in his pocket. -^ While this did not seem to affect the election of 1832, it did materially affect that of 1836. President Jackson's ob- jection to the expenditure of public money on the Wabash was that the stream was not sufficient for general naviga- tion and that there was no port of entry on the river. In the next session Senator John Tipton presented another bill for the improvement of the Wabash, including in the bill a provision making Lafayette a port of entry. Tipton 20 Indiana RepuMican, Sept. 20, 1832, quoting the Wuhash Courier. The Wahash Herald asserted the Democratic view. 21 Indiana Journal, Sept. 8, 1832; also Vincennes Gazette, Aug. 2, 1834. 308 HISTORY OF INDIANA cited thirty cases in which Jackson had signed similar measures. But it was all useless. The President vetoed it and thereby lost the support of his friends in the Wa- bash Valley, and perhaps thereby lost the State to Van Buren in 1836.-- Just before the election, October, 1832, a committee of prominent Whigs drew up a statement called "Facts for the people." It set forth in a masterly way the national issues, and the Whig arguments. In this respect it was the forerunner of the modern campaign text-book. The vote, however, showed that Jackson still retained the sup- port of the Indiana voters. Clay carried two of the seven congressional districts, and nineteen out of the sixty-six counties. Jackson's majority was 6,077. Fountain, Knox, Vigo, Tippecanoe, and Cass counties showed by their vote their resentment of the Wabash veto.^^ Samuel Judah, United States attorney, and Samuel Milroy, receiver at Crawfordsville, criticised Jackson and both lost their offices in 1833. Dr. Canby also lost his position in the land office at Crawfordsville. Judge Jeremiah Sullivan likewise bolted on the bank veto. Wayne county gave Clay a majority of 969, the largest county majority in the State. Jackson's heaviest vote came from the triangle between Indianapolis, Madison, and Evansville.-^ This was, and still is, a center of Jacksonian Democracy in Indiana. One of the sharpest political struggles that had taken place in the State up to the time took place in the General Assembly of 1832. The veto of the bill rechartering the Second Bank of the United States made it imperative that some form of currency be provided for the citizens of In- diana. Several plans v/ere submitted and many committee reports made. Finally three plans were v/orked out and embodied in bills. The General Assembly, however, was 22 Logan Esarey. Internal Improi-ements in Earlii Indiana, 77. -^Indiana Journal. Oct. .3. 1832. For Ti])ton's quarrel with Jackson see .V//C.S' Rcpi.sfcr, 46-443. 24 Election reports may be found in the St. Joseph Beacon, Dec. 15, 1832 ; Lawrenceburg Palladium, Dee. 8, 1832 ; Vevay Messenger, Dec. 15. These have been compared with the official returns and found con-ect. POLITICS 309 unable to agree on which one was best. Both parties de- manded action. Several members resigned rather than vote on these bills. -"^ The General Assembly elected in August, 1833, showed the effects of the failure of the previous Assembly to act. Twelve new senators took their seats. It was claimed that only one senator was re-elected. In the House not less than twenty-five new faces appeared. The old leaders who had dominated the General Assembly since 1816 dis- appeared. The pioneer period of Indiana history was ended, so far as the State legislature was concerned. The congressional elections in 1833 again showed the superior organization of the Democratic Party. Ratliff Boone, of the First District, was opposed by four Whigs and one Anti-Mason candidate. The latter. Dr. D. G. Mitchell, of Corydon, polled 287 votes out of a total of 7,805 in the district.-^ The year 1834 brought with it a renewal of the contest between Governor Noble and James G. Read for the gov- ernorship. The latter was nominated by a poorly attended convention at Indianapolis. The charge was made that it was attended merely by officeholders. Twenty-three out of the sixty-three counties were not represented at all. The Whigs referred to it as a caucus."-" By this time the State was deeply interested in internal improvement schemes, had chartered a State Bank, and was looking forward with great ambitions. Governor Noble was the soul of all these policies. He was not a par- tisan. The Whig Indiana Journal called him a Jacksonian Democrat. He appointed Nathan B. Palmer, one of the leaders of the Democrats, to the office of Treasurer of 2o Jndiann Democrat, Feb. !). 1833. Calvin Fletcher, then a senator from Marion county, resigned. The Democrat approved of his resigna- tion if he could not vote as his constituents desired: "In this land of Republican principles the right of instruction is generally conceded as ane of the reserved rights of the people, and that man who openly de- nies that right will seldom be honored with their confidence." This was sound Jacksonian Democracy. -^Indiana Palladium, Aug. 31, 18.33. -'^Indiana Journal, ,T;in. 4 and .Jan. 11, 1834. (21) 310 HISTORY OF INDIANA State.- ^ By sldllful political management he had built up a bipartisan organization, the leading members of which were the promoters of the State Bank and the internal im- provements. This organization controlled State politics for ten or twelve years, until the failure of the internal im- provements brought the leaders into disfavor. Mr. Read also claimed to be non-partisan.-'-' In this role of non-parti- sanship Noble had all the advantage for Read had been an outspoken and unsparing Jackson man. Early in the campaign Read and Noble signed a pledge not to do any canvassing. They had opposed each other in a canvass of the State three years before, both had been in public life for many years, and it was thought a waste of time and money to canvass the State."" The agreement, however, was largely in favor of the governor, since he was meeting voters from all parts of the State every day. In spite of this promise. Read made a canvass, but the result was evident from the beginning. -^^ The national elections everywhere were a severe rebuke to Jackson. The Whig papers are full of bitter attacks on Jackson's veto, specie circular, pet banks, the betrayal of the tariff, and the war on the United States Bank. Read carried sixteen out of the seventy counties voting. These were in the Jacksonian triangle, with Carroll and Parke added. He was defeated in the State by a vote of 27,302 to 36,925.''^- He lost five out of seven congressional 28 Indiana Journal, Feb. 22, 1834. -^Indiana Journal, April 19, 1. An excellent account of this whole "War" is given by Sanford C. Cox. Old Settlers. 86-98. For a complete contemporary history see Wakefield's History of the Blaelc Haick War. The mounted ranger service was authorized b.v Act of June 15. 1832. This authorized the president to enroll six companies of 100 men each. Statutes at Large. 1832. ch. CXXXI. All the details, are given in the Indiana Demoerat and the Indiana Journal iinder dates corresponding to the above. The above account is based upon the JournaVs reports. 10 United States Statutes at Larpe. 1810, ch. LXXXV. 11 Isiiae McCoy, History of the Baptist Indian Missions; J. B. Fin- ley, Life Among the Indians; Jacob Piatt Dunn, True Indian Stories. REMOVAL OF INDIANS FROM THE STATE 333 turned into the Indian country, i- These small traders car- ried whisky to the Indian villages and traded it for furs. They were, in fact, poorly disguised robbers. Various missionaries and other friends of the Indians soon began to plead for help. Most of them agreed that it would be better to get the Indians beyond the frontier. It was a policy of the Jacksonian Democrats to get them out of the way of the white settlers. The law of May 28, 1830, permitted any Indian tribe that cared to, to trade its land along the border for lands beyond the Mississippi.^-^ The law of July 9, 1832, which provided for a complete reorgan- ization of the Indian service, also appropriated $20,000 to hold councils among the Indiana Indians in order to induce them to migrate beyond the Mississippi. ^^ During the summer of 1833, and later, agents were busy along the upper Wabash and on Eel river gathering up par- ties of Indians and transporting them to the West. A fav- orite plan was to give horses to a number of chiefs and pay their way out to the new country on a tour of inspection. If necessary, these were then bribed to give a glowing re- port of the country they had seen. The Indians were by that means persuaded to emigrate.^"- The best illustration of the hatred which the Indiana settlers bore toward the Indians is their treatment of the Pottawattomies, whom they forcibly expelled from the State in the summer of 1838. The Pottawattomies orig- inally hunted over the region south of Lake Michigan, 1- Auiericaii State Papers. I iidlan Affairs, II. :>2G. 13 President Monroe also had recommended this lujlicy; see Ameri- can State Papers, Irulian Affairs. II. 541, seq. Many Indians preferred to go; see Indiana Democrat, October 9. 1830. The Kicl^apoos had been transferred by treaty in 1820: see American State Papers, Indian Affairs, II, 223. The Dehiwares went beyond the Mississippi in 1820; see Vincennes Centinel, November 4. 1820. 14 United, States Statutes at Large, 18.32. ch. CLXXIV ; CLXXV ; also for 1834. ch. CLXII. !«> This work extended over several years. The cost astonished even the liberal Congress of 1833. The Senate called for an investigation. The result of this was Senate Document 512, published in tive volumes in 1834. entitled Indian Removals. Abel Pepper was the most active agent in this state. 334 HISTORY OF INDIANA north of the Wabash, and west of the St. Joseph and St. Mary's rivers. They were usually hostile to the Americans when war was on. They led in the Indian massacre at Fort Dearborn, and in the attack on Fort Wayne and Fort Harrison. Most of the warriors under the Prophet at Tippecanoe, as well as those who perpetrated the Pigeon Roost murders and har- assed the White river border from Vallonia to the Wabash above Vincennes during the following years, were thought to be Pottawattomies. On the other hand, they had given the settlers the land for the Michigan Road — a body of land equal to a strip a mile wide from the Ohio to the lake. Few settlers penetrated their lake-region hunting grounds before 1830. Beginning as early as 1817, in a treaty at Fort Meigs, the government adopted the unfor- tunate policy of making special reservations for Indian chiefs who refused to join the tribe in selling land. As a result of this policy several bands of Pottawattomies had special reservations in Marshall and adjoining counties. The treaty of 1832 took from the tribe its tribal lands, leaving Chief Menominee a reservation around Twin Lakes and ex- tending up to the present city of Plymouth. Down around Maxinkuckee, Chief Aubbeenaubee had a large reservation. Chief Benack and his village lived on a reservation in Tip- pecanoe township. In fact, Indians claimed and occupied the whole county except the strip of land given for the Michigan Road, a mile wide, stretching across the country north and south through Plymouth. In 1834 a commission tried to buy the Indian land and succeeded in making a contract for most of it at fifty cents an acre. But on account of some individual reservations made in the treaty the government refused to ratify the purchase. Col. Abel C. Pepper, of Lawrenceburg, then Indian agent, succeeded, in 1836, in buying the Indians out at $1 per acre, giving the Indians the privilege of remaining two years on the lands. The Indians asserted that this cession REMOVAL OF INDIANS FROM THE STATE 335 was obtained by unfair means, but it seemed to have been accomplished as most others had been. Anticipating the land sale which was to take place when the Indian lease expired, August 5, 1838, squatters began to enter the country and settle on the Indian land. They expected to hold their land later by the right of pre-emption. The Indians began to show resentment as the time for their forced migration approached. They contended that the chiefs had no right to sell the lands, and went so far as to murder one of the chiefs who had "touched the quill." General Morgan and Colonel Pepper were busy among them, trying to persuade them that in the west was a much better place for them. Councils were held at Plymouth and at Dixie Lake, but the red men were obdurate. Then Col. Edward A. Hannegan, later a United States senator from Indiana, came from the post with a company of militia to see what effect that would have. It had none. Pioneers had already squatted on the Indian lands. On August 5 these squatters demanded possession of the In- dian huts and fields. Many of the Indians had been in- duced to plant corn. They were told that the government would not sell their land till it was surveyed, and that could not be done during the summer of 1838. The Indians refused to give possession and both par- ties resorted to violence. The fur traders in the region sided with the Indians and advised them to resist the squat- ters. The Catholic priest located at the Twin Lake Mis- sion also advised them that the squatters had no right to demand their land, especially the crop of corn which was now raised. A squatter named Waters, it seems, was especially per- sistent in demanding that the Indians give him possession of a quarter section of land he had laid claim to. About the middle of August some Indians battered down his cabin . door with an ax. In return the squatters joined together and burned eight or ten wigwams. The pioneers along the frontier were expecting trouble. It had been only a few years since the scare of the Black 336 HISTORY OF INDIANA Hawk War. The Miamis had been sullen all the season. Stragglers from the transported tribes were returning from the west and telling how their fellows had suffered from cold and hunger out on the plains. So when word was re- ceived that the Indians were committing acts of violence the government acted swiftly. Colonel Pepper called all the warriors together in coun- cil at Twin Lakes, August 29. He could do nothing with them, however. The old men had lost control of the young bucks. All flatly refused to leave, saying that both they and the President had been deceived. While they were sit- ting in council John Tipton with the militia arrived. The government agents had been preparing all summer for the removal of the tribe, but perhaps would not have done it till the cool weather of the autumn. As soon as Colonel Pepper of Logansport had heard of the first Indian depredation — and he heard as soon as a courier from the squatters could reach him, August 26 — he at once sent a dispatch by mounted courier to Governor David Wallace asking for a good general and at least one hundred soldiers. He reported that the Pottawattomies on Yellow river were in arms and an outbreak was ex- pected at any moment. This message reached Governor Wallace on the next day. The same day he received word the governor sent an order by courier to John Tipton of Logansport, ordering him to muster the Cass and Miami county militia and proceed with all haste to the scene of trouble. Tipton lost no time in enrolling the militia. They left Logansport at one p. m. August 29. At ten o'clock that night they went into camp at Chippewa. Breaking camp at 3 a. m., they reached Twin Lakes as above noted and found Colonel Pepper and the Indians in council. Tipton at once stated his business, scolding the chiefs for the depredations. The Indians made no excuses for the out- breaks and again refused to leave their homes. From the report it seems clear the whites were the aggressors and had done nearly all the damage. Tipton wasted no words, but established a camp on an island in the lake and detained REMOVAL OF INDIANS FROM THE STATE 337 all the Indians present, about 200. As all the leaders were present it was easy to control the rest. All were dis- armed as soon as found. Squads of soldiers patrolled the country in all direc- tions looking for the Indians and driving them in. Many, fearing harm to those at council, came in to see what was wrong. By September 1 more than 700 were rounded up. All the Indian wigwams and cabins were destroyed. Their ponies and all their other property were brought into camp. Early on the morning of September 4 Tipton com- menced to load the thirteen army wagons in which their goods were to be moved. About 400 horses were found and kept on the island till ready to start. The procession left the Twin Lakes, September 4, and dragged its mournful way south over the Michigan Road through Chippewa, twenty-one miles distant, going into camp at sunset. Father Pettit, the missionary whom Bishop Brute had stationed there, had been allowed to gather the Indians into the little chapel and say a farewell mass before they started. The first day's march was ex- cessively tiresome. No water could be found for drinking and the road was dusty. They traveled from 9 a. m. to sunset, the mounted guard prodding on the laggards. Next day forty-one persons were unable to move. Oth- ers had to wait on the sick. Beef, flour, and bacon had been ordered from Logansport, forty-six miles distant, but only a little reached them. On September 5 they reached Mud creek. Twenty guards deserted during the day, stealing Indian horses on which to get away. On September 6 the Indians marched seventeen miles reaching Logansport, about 800 strong. They waited near the town three days for the government agents to make better arrangements for traveling. One-half the militia were discharged and half were kept to accompany the Indians to the State line. By this time the Indian children and old people were completely worn out. The children, especially, were dying in great numbers, not being used to such fare. Physicians 338 HISTORY OF INDIANA from Logansport reached them on the 9th and reported three hundred unfit for travel. The march from this time was not so rapid. William Polke took a small detachment of troops and revisited the abandoned villages to see if any Indians had returned. Several children died during the stay at Logansport. September 10, they started at 9 a. m. and skirted the north bank of the Wabash all day, reaching Winnamac's old village by 5 p. m. Food was very scarce. The priest was given permisison to say mass every evening. They left Winnamac's old village at 10 a. m., marched seventeen miles on the 11th, and camped at Pleasant Run at 5 p. m. Next day they forded the Tippecanoe at 11 a. m. and passed the Battleground at 12 m. Here Tipton distributed to the Indians $5,000 worth of dry-goods, hoping by this means to raise their spirits somewhat. Chief Wewissa's mother died on the 12th at the extreme age of 100. She had asked to be killed and buried with her fathers at the Mission and the chief had decided to humor her, but the white men would not permit it. On September 13th they reached Lagrange on the Wabash, a short distance below Lafayette, marching eighteen miles. One hundred and sixty were under the care of Dr. Ritchie and son, the attending physicians. The physicians were almost entirely out of medicine. The children were dying at the rate of from three to five a day. On the 14th they reached Williamsport. On the 16th they reached Danville, 111. Heat and dust were getting worse. Large numbers of sick had to be left in the road. Horses were worn out and the guards were nearly all sick, and unable to proceed. At Sandusky Point, on the 18th of September, Tipton turned the command over to Judge William Polke, who had been appointed by the national government to superintend the removal. Judge Polke, Father Pettit, and an escort of fifteen men continued with the broken tribe to their destination on the Osage river, in Kansas. REMOVAL OF INDIANS FROM THE STATE 339 The journey required about two months and cost the lives of one-fifth of the tribe. ^^^ A few Indians remained in Indiana scattered on small reservations in various parts of the State. The larger numbers of these were on the lower Mississinewa, around Maxinkuckee Lake, and around the small lakes in Kosci- usko county. As citizens they were no match in their busi- ness dealings with their white neighbors. They gradually parted with their lands and spent the proceeds. A few remain at present, respected and treated well by their white neighbors. They have taken on enough of the white man's thrift and culture to convince anyone that the whole tribe might, under more fortunate circtimstances, have been saved to civilization. 16 The details of this removal are jiiveii iu the Indianapolis, Logans- port and LaFayette papers. The Irulinna Journal, and Indiana Democrat of Indianapolis contain the official reports; see also Jacob P. Dunn, "The Trail of Death." in True Indian titories; Col. William M. Cock- rum, A Pioneer History of Indiana tells the stoiy J^lso. The best dis- cussion of this phase of our Indian history is by W. E. McDonald, of Plymouth, who interested the General Assembly in the matter of erect- ing a monument to the tribes in Marshall County. CHAPTER XV the public lands in indiana § 63 The Survey, Its Methods and Area All the land of Indiana except the "Gore" falls under what is known as the Fifth System of the public lands sur- vey. The system was worked out by Col. Jared Mansfield, the surveyor-general from 1803 to 1814. The immediate problem that confronted Mr. Mansfield in 1803 was to sur- vey the Vincennes Purchase. This rectangle lay around and to the east of Vincennes, being entirely surrounded by Indian lands. The northeast corner was two miles north of Orleans and the southeast corner was in the northern part of Perry county. These are known as Freeman's Cor- ners from the name of the surveyor who ran the lines in 1803. Through the northeast corner of the Vincennes tract was run the Second Principal Meridian, which struck the Ohio river at the east boundary of Perry county. This meridian governs all the survey of Indiana except that wedge east of the Greenville Treaty line called the "Gore." The first base line was surveyed by Ebenezer Buckingham in 1804. It follows, approximately, the old road from Vin- cennes to Louisville, striking the Wabash three miles above the mouth of White river. On the principal meridian, corners were set up six miles apart marking the tiers of townships. Other corners were set up one mile apart, marking the sections. On the base line similar corners were set up at equal intervals. The latter corners governed the township and section lines on the north side of the base line only. After the two main lines were surveyed the parallel lines were run six miles PUBLIC LANDS IN INDIANA 341 apart after which the section lines were established. In running the meridian section lines it was found that they converged at the northern base or correction line. This made it necessary to set a double row of section corners along the base lines. The ones which controlled the south- ern side were called the "close up" corners. The actual surveys were made by deputy surveyors hired by the United States surveyor general for the dis- trict. The deputies used solar compasses, transits, and common compasses. A surveying squad consisted of two chainmen, a flagman, axman, and two mound men. The chainmen measured the distance vvith a four, or two rod chain. The short chain, 33 feet long, was used on rough ground since, in measuring, the chain had to be level. The flagman led the squad placing the flag as directed by the surveyor. The axman cut the bushes out of the way and also "blazed" the trees. If a tree was a "liner" it was chopped, or "blazed," on both sides, if a "bearing'^' tree, that is, stood near the line, it was "blazed" only on the side facing the line. The mound men had to establish corners. If a tree stood exactly on the corner it was properly "blazed" and marked. If there was no tree a stone was set. If no stone was convenient a mound of dirt was erected. In the latter cases trees were marked as "wit- nesses," the surveyor recording in his field notes the direc- tion, distance, and size of the trees. The section and range stones were marked with the proper numbers and letters so that any one could tell the exact range, township, and section. The surveyor noted also the character of land, the tim- ber, and springs, on each section, and its probable value. All field notes were then returned to the surveyor general and, if approved by him, were sent to the government land ofiice. After all the land was sold the surveyor's notes and plats were turned over to the State in which the sur- veys were located and are now preserved at the State capitals. In the original survey only the section lines were run, but in making the plats the draftsman laid down the cross (23) 342 HISTORY OF INDIANA lines dividing the section into quarters and sixteenths. The sections in a congressional township were numbered from one up to thirty-six, beginning in the northeast corner and numbering the tiers back and forth. The townships were numbered consecutively as townships north and south and as ranges east and west.^ The whole expense of surveying was not to exceed three dollars for each linear mile.- § 64 Land Offices After a tract of land was surveyed, a land office was opened and the land placed on the market. As soon as surveyors had been put to work on the Vincennes Purchase a land office was authorized.- This office was ordered opened January 1, 1805. John Badollet, a friend of Al- bert Gallatin, and later a member of the State constitutional convention, and Nathaniel Ewing were the men placed in charge of the new office. Comparatively little land was sold here till after the close of the War of 1812. At this office was sold all the land then open for settlement west of the Second Principal Meridian. In 1805 a line was run from Freeman's corner near Orleans to the Greenville Treaty line near Brookville and all the government land between this and the Ohio river ♦ was placed under survey. This tract had been purchased from the Indians in 1805. In 1807 a law provided for the opening of a land office for the tract at Jeffersonville.^ This office controlled the land east of the Second Principal Meridian. The settlers from the south, especially from Kentucky, who settled the hill country from New Albany to Bloomington entered their land at this office. They formed the backbone of the "southern" element in our population. They were Jacksonian in politics, Protestant 1 Tl'.oin.is I>on;il(lsou. The I'ublic Donidiii. eb. VII : Pnysou .J. Treat, The XdtionaJ Land Systctn. cli. VIII: Miles' Weekly Register. April 12. 1S17. The "Life i)f Ziba Foote." Vol. II. :>."»n. Iiulinmt Uistoriral Soriety PuhUeations. - United i."). Tbis act also provided for land offices at Detroit aud Kasbaskia. •1 Statutes at Large, 1807, ch. 49. Sec. I. PUBLIC LANDS IN INDIANA 343 in religion, hostile to slavery, social, freedom-loving, poor, conservative, brilliant but uneducated.^ With the ratification of the New Purchase Treaty in 1818 the whole of central Indiana was thrown open to the surveyors. The lands were divided into two districts, one land office being established at Brookville and the other at Terre Haute.'^ The two land districts were separated by the line separating the first and second ranges east of the Second Principal Meridian. The Brookville office was opened early in the year 1819 by Lazarus Noble, a brother of Senator James Noble and Governor Noah Noble. The settlers in the Whitewater Valley previous to this time had entered their lands at the Cincinnati office. This was not inconvenient for them since the large majority of them came down the Ohio or crossed it at Cincinnati. The Quakers were strong in this section, especially in Wayne county. For many years this was the most populous county in the State. Politically, the section was Whig, and aggressively anti-slavery. Williamson Dunn and Ambrose Whitlock opened the land office at Terre Haute in 1819. The settlers came very largely by the Wabash and hence found Terre Haute a con- venient point. They came from all parts of the South and East and had no marked racial, religious, or political char- acteristics. With the rush of settlers to the capital In 1825 the land office of Brookville was moved there. For a time it seems offices were maintained at both places. While Lazarus Noble was on his way to Indianapolis in October, 1825, to open the new office he died and was succeeded by his brother, later Governor Noah Noble. '^ This office was especially active after the National Road reached Indian- apolis. By 1822 settlers were locating around Fort Wayne. 5 Baynard R. Hall, The .Yett Purchase; Hanford A. Edson, Presby- terianism, in Indiana. 6 United States Statutes at Large, 1819, ch. 92. For the terms and boundaries of the New Purchase see United States Statutes at Large, Vol. 7, Indian Treaties, 187. 7 Indiana Journal, August 16, 1825 ; also November 22, 1S25. 344 HISTORY OF INDIANA There was a large number of special reservations in that region but no public lands opened to settlement. Capt. James Riley came in the spring of 1822 and surveyed lands in the vicinity. The act of May 8, 1822, established a land office.^ The land east of the line between ranges one and two east and north of the Brookville District was included in the Fort Wayne District. The office was opened with a land sale October 22, 1823. Joseph Holman, of Wayne county, was the first receiver and Samuel Vance of Law- renceburg, register. The office was in the old fort.^ Dur- ing the decade from 1830 to 1840 this office was thronged with settlers who came up the Maumee, attracted by the opening of the Wabash and Erie canal. In 1828 the northwest quarter of the State was erected into the Crawfordsville District.^*^ Beginning about 1825 a heavy immigration set into the Wabash country by emi- grants from the southern part of Indiana and elsewhere, coming up through the central part of the State. Such people found it inconvenient to go to Terre Haute. For this reason Dunn and Whitlock had held a land auction at Crawfordsville, beginning December 24, 1824.^1 Just when the office was permanently located at Crawfordsville does not appear, but it was prior to 1828. The last land office district to be laid off in Indiana was the LaPorte. It included the lands lying west of the east- ern boundaries of Kosciusko and Elkhart counties, and north of the parallel running through Delphi. i- The law providing for this office was passed March 2, 1833, but just when the office was opened does not appear. It was removed to Winamac during the summer of 1839.^3 § 65 Land Sales Excepting the lands reserved for school purposes, and those bordering salt springs and known as the "saline 8 United States Statutefi at Large. 1822. ch. 126. 9 Col. Robert S. Robertson, Valley of the Upper Maumee, I, 199. 10 United States Statutes at Large, 1833. cb. 77, See. 10. 11 Sanford Cox, Old Settlers, 17. 12 United States Statutes at Large, 18,33, cb. 78, Sec. 10. 13 Indiana Journal, November 15, 1839. PUBLIC LANDS IN INDIANA 345 Land Surveys — State Geological Report, 1882. 346 HISTORY OF INDIANA lands," all the lots in a district were offered at public auction. Due to the fact that a district's boundaries were frequently changed after an Indian treaty, there might be held more than one auction in a district. At the auction, which usually took place at the opening of the district, the various lots of land were cried and sold to the highest bidder, provided the bid was equal to or above the minimum price fixed by Congress. Three months' notice of auctions was given in a proclamation by the President. The lands were offered in whole, half, or quarter section lots. Smaller lots were sold if the buyer would pay the extra cost of surveying. The usual duration of the sale was three weeks, but after 1820 Congress re- duced the time to two weeks. The price fixed by Congress in 1800 was $2 per acre.^^ The purchaser was required to pay at the time of purchase $6 per section or $3 per half section to cover the cost of the survey, and he was also required to deposit one- twentieth of the purchase price. He then had forty days to pay the first installment which consisted of one-fourth of the purchase price. The last installments consisting of one-fourth each were due at the end of two, three, and four years. Six per cent interest was charged if pay- ments were not made on time, and eight per cent discount was allowed if money was paid before it was due. The government was a liberal creditor. Every favor possible was shown to the honest buyer. Under a later law the debtor was given scrip for what he had paid, if unable to complete his payments. When all payments were made the purchaser was given a patent. i"' The amount of money taken in at the land office was proverbial. January 1, 1815, the ofifice at Jeffersonville reported $242,176 outstanding, while Vincennes had $122,- 723 out. By January 1, 1819, these debts by the land buy- 14 The (jovei'umeut has steadily reduced the price of imblic lands. The following have been the prices: if2.r)0, $2.00. $1.25, $1.00. $.75. $.6(5%. $.50, $.25. $.12%, and gifts as a homestead. Thomas Donaldson, The Puhlw Domain, index. 15 The Government lost about $20.0(X).000 out of $47,000,000 credited under the law of 1800. PUBLIC LANDS IN INDIANA 347 ers had increased to $1,021,834, and $1,390,909 respect- ively.^^ During the first year of our statehood the Jefferson- ville Land Office sold 261,142 acres for $522,285; Vin- cennes 325,361 acres for $601,302.1" The public land sales at Indianapolis were held in October, 1820, July and August, 1821, and in September, 1822. There were sold 237,173 acres at an average price of $1,441/2 per acre. The remain- der of this district, 570,227 acres, was sold between 1820 and 1828 for the minimum price, which had been reduced at that time to $1.25 per acre.^"' The receiver at Fort Wayne wrote in July, 1836, that he was receiving $25,000 per day. He expected to take in $1,500,000 during the season. Crawfordsville was doing even better ; in fact the latter office exceeded all the offices of the United States for several years in the amount of business done.^'* One of the serious problems of the land office was to get the money back to the government. After Jackson issued the Specie Circular nearly all the money received was in coin. From Ft. Wayne and Crawfordsville it was frequently transported in four-horse wagons, guarded by a score of armed men. The receivers were very careful as to the kind of money they received. Only such as could be deposited in the Bank of the United States as cash would be received. It was necessary for one who owed the land office to get this kind of money. This led to much inconvenience and positive wrong. At the old land office of Vincennes a bank was established where the customers could get their bank notes converted into land-office money. The bankers — in this case the receiver was president of the bank — charged from six to twelve per cent for this service. This business was called "note shaving." The money when re- ceived at the land office was deposited immediately in the ^^ American State Papers; FiuatuT, III, 782. ■ IT A'i/e.s' Register, XIII. 261. ^8 Indiana Journal, July 19, 1834. '^^ RepuhJicnn and Banner, Julj- 20, 18.^6: Log:;iiisi»(iit Telegraph. June IS. 1836. 348 HISTORY OF INDIANA bank and again used for "note shaving." The office at In- dianapolis was kept over a store, the storekeeper doing the "note shaving" with money furnished by the receiver of the land office.-" The land offices were among the most lucrative public positions open to ambitious politicians. As a result there v/ere many cases of fraud and embezzlement, not to men- tion errors caused by ignorance. A general investigation of the land offices was begun in 1833. James B. Gardner, who inspected the offices in Indiana, found them in bad condition. He estimated that one-fifth of all the land cer- tificates issued was defective either through the laziness or ignorance of the register. Many of the receivers were speculating in land scrip. As mentioned above, if any one failed to pay in full for land, the land was taken back and the buyer was given scrip or due bills for money actually paid and this was subsequently received as cash in payment for other land. The receiver bought up this scrip at heavy discount and turned it in as cash. Speculators in the east bought it up and cashed it with dishonest receivers. A widely organ- ized ring of speculators was found among the congressmen and men in the General Land Office at Washington. It perhaps cost one Indiana senator his re-election. The agent at Indianapolis in 1833, in connection with a mer- chant of the toM^n, was doing an extensive business in scrip, of which the merchant, during the year 1833, had gathered up $98,000 worth. Not only was this turned into the land office at par but it was used by the merchant to "shave" money brought in by the buyers, which was not acceptable at the land office. A clerk in the store held a commission as notary public and was making large sums of money taking affidavits which were demanded on every pretense by the receiver who shared in the fees. The receiver had formed a partnership with a local broker and they were doing a profitable business speculating in lands -^ Ametican State Papers, Finance, V, 66; American State Papers, Public Lands, VII, 507; see also Lognn Esarey, EurJij Banldng in In- diana, 234. PUBLIC LANDS IN INDIANA 349 and cashing notes given by the land buyers. On these notes they got eight per cent discount. At the time of the investigation the receiver had $12,000 of government money so invested. The receiver had also loaned large sums of money to the merchants in Indianapolis. The United States attorney, who was a candidate for United States senator, found it very embarrassing politically to collect the debts due the land office on account of the large number of prominent persons who had borrowed money from the re- ceiver. At Crawfordsville the inspector found everything in an uproar. The office had been placed in the hands of Dr. I. T. Canby, the defeated candidate for governor in 1828. As soon as he arrived, he and his bondsmen began using the land office money to set themselves up in the mercantile business. In a short time Canby was a defaulter to the extent of $48,433. His bondsmen had entered 3,200 acres of first class land at the lowest price. Gen. Samuel Miiroy, one of his bondsmen, had taken over the office but had later turned it over to his son.-' Speculation in public lands did not play so important a part in Indiana as it had in Ohio. Many of the towns of the State, however, were opened up by speculators. There was complaint of speculators at the land sale at Indian- apolis, Jeffersonville, and especially at Fort Wayne. By 1830 the speculator had come into such bad repute that he would not be tolerated at the sales. This was the case at Crawfordsville, LaPorte, and Winamac. Women who came to the sales to bid off their homesteads were not bid against. After the sales, speculators or their agents visited the land office and frequently bought up a great many tracts. One of their plans was to hunt up those persons who had pur- 21 The details of tliis inve.sti^-itiou are giveu in American Slate Papers, Public Lundf;, VII. 560. The following defalcations were report- ed : Josepli Holman. Fort Wayne. $4,721, paid after suit: Charles ■M. Taylor, Jeffersonville, $5,738, paid after suit ; Andrew P. Hay, Jeffersonville, $5,046, paid after suit ; J. C. S. Harrison. Yincennes, $9,253, giveu IS years to pay; Israel T. Canby, Crawfordsville, $46,433, paid by securities. The money at Indianapolis was secured by the bonds- men without suit and the office reported even. 350 HISTORY OF INDIANA chased small tracts and buy the adjoining land. If the settler prospered he would soon want more land. If he failed the speculator would buy his tract at the government price and get the advantage of the improvements. In any case he would get the advantage of the rise of land without doing his part in developing the community. He paid very little tax, did not help build roads, raise houses, churches, schoolhouses, or roll logs. The speculator, the note shaver, and the horse thief were the most despised men on the frontier. -- The following table shows the amount of land sold in the years given and the money received. It gives one a good idea of the number of persons coming into the State every year, though of course not all buyers were immi- grants : 1816 there were sold, 586.503 acres for $1,128..")S7 1817-1822 were sold. acres for 2.108,336 1822 there were sold. 252.982 acres for 329.066 1823 there were sold, 165,046 acres for 211,157 1824 there were sold. 154.558 acres for 187.508 1825 there were sold, 162,270 acres for 210,248 1826 there were sold, 200,190 acres for 250.238 1827 there were sold. 209.691 acres for 263.063 1828 there were sold, 250.812 acres for 313,517 1829 there were sold. .346,527 acres for 435,571 1830 there were sold, 476.351 acres for .598.115 1831 there were sold. .554.436 acres for 694.863 1832 there were sold. 546,844 acres for 684.209 1833 there were sold. 5.54,681 acres for 693,.522-3 The oflices had collected the following; anioiiiits up to the close of 1835: Vincennes $2,317,657 Jeffersonville 2,26.5,127 Brookville & Indianapolis 2,153,875 Terre Haute & Crawfordsville 2,315.689 Fort Wayne 355,853 LaPorte 102,040-'4 The total area of the public land in Indiana was 21,637,- 760 acres. Of this the State of Indiana received as a gift 22 Sanford Cox. Old Settlers. 18; Col. Willi.uu M. Cockruni. A Pioneer History of IndhiiKi: Robert S. Robertson, \aUcii of the Upper Maumee, I, 198. -'^American titute rd/icrx. Pitblic Lmidx. \'l], .").•',(); see also Niles' Register, IX. 278. --^American t^tatc Papers. I'uhlic Laiids, VII, ."4;!. PUBLIC LANDS IN INDIANA 351 23,040 acres of "Saline lands" ; 2,612,321 acres of "swamp lands" ; 650,317 acres for common schools ; 46,080 acres for the university; 1,457,366 acres for the Wabash and Erie canal; 2,560 acres for a capital site; 170,582 acres for the Michigan road.--^ 25 Thomas Donaldson. The Public Domain, index; Public Lands, VI, 663; Purdue University received 212.238 acres, but none of it was in Indiana. CHAPTER XVI systematic internal improvements § 66 The Problem, the People, and the Legislature Immediately after the War of 1812 there arose in all parts of the United States a demand for internal improve- ments constructed by the government. The rise of a politi- cal party favoring this policy is contemporaneous with the admission of Indiana into the Union. The party found its strength among the farmers, and was based on a legitimate economic need. The farmers throughout the State pos- sessed an abundance of fertile land. Their surplus prod- ucts were of little value to them, since a large part, and frequently all, of their profits were eaten up in transporta- tion. Their markets were the seaboard cities, and the far- ther west the farmer was, the less valuable was his sur- plus grain. Every State from New York south and west was busy from 1816 to 1840 developing and perfecting its own system. Legislators and legislatures were called wise just in proportion to the completeness and inclusiveness of their systems. Every State finally caught the fever, and in the two decades following the close of the War of 1812 they rolled up a combined internal improvement debt ag- gregating $225,000,000.^ Pennsylvania took the lead in amount, while New York led in time and spirit, and was the only one to carry the policy to success. At the very time when the Indiana General Assembly was holding its first session, the future policy of the United States toward internal improvement was being decided. In the session of Congress, convened in 1816, a select committee,- ap- ^ American Almanac and Repository of Useful KiunrJedge for the Year 1840. 105, Boston. 2McM;ister, A History of the People of the United States. IV, 411. SYSTEMATIC INTERNAL IMPROVEMENTS 353 pointed on motion of Calhoun, introduced a bill setting aside the bonus of $1,500,000, paid by the Second Bank of the United States, and the annual dividend on $7,000,000 of stock, owned by the United States, as a fund for building- roads and canals. This measure passed Congress by vir- tue of votes from the middle and western States, but it was vetoed by Madison. Three months after the first Indiana Assembly adjourned — April 15, 1817 — the legislature of New York undertook the construction of the Erie canal, and every resource of that State, from the income of lot- teries to the labor of her convicts, was pledged to its com- pletion. In his message to the General Assembly of December 2, 1817, Governor Jennings of Indiana referred to a letter from DeWitt Clinton of New York, discussing the prac- ticability of connecting the Great Lakes with the Ohio- Mississippi system, thus making all-water connection be- tween the Hudson and Mississippi.^ In the same message, he notified the General Assembly of a resolution of the Pennsylvania legislature, inviting the governors of Ohio, Virginia, Kentucky, and Indiana to meet the governor of Pennsylvania in a conference on internal improvements, especially looking to the better navigation of the Ohio. Even then there were two parties in State politics that continued through the whole era to divide the counsels and energies of the young State. The settlers along the Ohio and Wabash rivers looked to New Orleans as the natural emporium; while all those settlers, and they were rapidly gaining the ascendency, who came over the National Road, looked to New York and the seaboard cities as the best markets. During the next ten years the "System" was the commonest subject of discussion. No one knew exactly what was meant by the "System," but it was felt that as soon as possible the State, by some means or other, would construct some kind of a system of communication that would answer the needs of the people. In response to memorials. Congress, May 26, 1824, do- nated to the State a strip of land 320 feet wide through the 3 Rouse Jounwi. 1817. 8. 354 HISTORY OF INDIANA public domain, on condition that the State, in twelve years, would construct a canal thereon. The committee on canals of the Indiana General Assembly reported the grant illib- eral, and moved another memorial.^ The governor urged in his message of 1825 that the grant be accepted at once and a further memorial sent to that body asking a section of land for each mile.'- This would easily build it. Thus a continuous waterway from New York to New Orleans would be opened across the country. The canal needed to be only twenty-eight miles long. Further, there was a great demand, continued the governor, for a canal from Law- renceburg to Fort Wayne. A company, in fact, was already surveying the route. A commissioner was then examining White river, and ere long two hundred miles of waterways would there be opened for navigation. Internal improve- ments were demanded by necessity and the spirit of the times. The State must have canals. The question of a canal at the portage between the Mau- mee and the Wabash rivers was an old one. Every statesman of this and the preceding period who was interested in the northwest had studied the problem of an all-water trade route between the seaboard and the Ohio valley. Washing- ton repeatedly discussed it ; and in a letter to his Secretary of War, Henry Knox, suggested the Maumee portage as the most feasible point of connection.'- The first definite in- formation was based on surveys and observations by Capt. James Riley, a United States surveyor. While surveying land for settlement he noted the ease with which the two rivers could be united. He reported to his superior, a re- port that soon found its way to Congress, that a canal six miles long would connect the St. Mary and Little rivers, from which navigation by the Maumee to Lake Erie and by the Wabash to the Ohio was easy. The swampy prairie through which the canal would run was reported to be so wet that no feeder would be required. This first observa- tion was made in 1818, and during the following season 4 House Journal, 1825, 176. 5 House Journal, 1825, 38. « Writings, IX. passim. ELKHART ^^ K05CIUSKO JASPeC r'""°"7f INDIANA I" 1636 E.V.SIiOCKLEY iNTEBNAr Improvements. 356 HISTORY OF INDIANA he raPx a line of levels. The canal, he thought, would need to be six miles in length. § 67 The Wabash and Erie Canal The history of the canal system of Indiana begins in earnest with an act of Congress approved March 2, 1827." The party of Clay and Adams, driven from power in the na- tion, thus, on the eve of dissolution, bequeathed its princi- ples and its policy to the State of Indiana. This act granted to the State, for the purpose of aiding to build a canal, uniting at navigable points the waters of the Maumee and those of the Wabash, a strip of land one-half of five sec- tions wide, on either side of the canal, reserving alternate sections to be selected by a land commissioner under the direction of the President. In the preceding session of the Indiana Assembly the canal committee had reported a bill providing for a canal board and some surveys. This bill failed on account of the reluctance of the majority to raise taxes.'' Surveyor James Shriver was then surveying the Whitewater for a company organized to build a canal from Lawrenceburg to Fort Wayne." Meantime the settlers on the upper Wabash were clam- oring for aid. Produce could not be sold nor could they get goods from any place. Salt was hauled by ox teams from Michigan City at a cost of $12 per barrel, the trip requiring two weeks. In 1826 a corps of United States engineers, under the charge of Colonel Schriver, then at work on Whitewater, was sent to survey the portage at Fort Wayne. All were soon sick and Colonel Schriver died. Asa Moore continued the survey to Tippecanoe, and then do\vn the Maumee as far as the rapids, where he also died in his tent, October 4, 1828.i" On January 5, 1828, Indiana accepted the gift from the nation and committed the State to the building of the canal. 11 The act of acceptance provided for a board of 7 United States Statutes at Larf/e. IV. 236. 8 House Joxinial. 1826. 214. ^ Governor's Message. House Journal. 1826. 46. If* Knapp. History of the Maumee Valley. .307. 1^ /yfnr.s- of Iiuli'iud. 1827. cb. 7. See ;ilso .Joint liesolntion. eh. 08. SYSTEMATIC INTERNAL IMPROVEMENTS 357 canal commissioners, to consist of three men. The commis- sioners were to select land, hire surveyors, locate the canal, make estimates, lay off town sites, and finance the under- taking, i- The sentiment of the State was strong for inter- nal improvements. All parties favored them. The country was delirious with internal improvement fever. Two of the canal commissioners, Burr and John, met on the call of Governor Ray at Indianapolis, July 17, 1828, organized, and proceeded to the Wabash; but on studying the law they found themselves without authority.^" A four years' war opened then in the State Assembly, fought on the floor in session and in the newspapers out of session. The lowest estimates on t?ie canal called for an expenditure of $991,000. The White VN^ater members cared little for the Wabash and hung back for a deal. The Ohio river group opposed openly and stoutly. The speaker, Ross Smiley of Union county, favored railroads. Governor Ray also fa- vored railroads because of less cost. The group that favored the canal, called the "Wabash Band," lacked unity. Mut- terings of discontent over high taxes reached all parts of Indiana from the people of Ohio, who were building a sys- tem of canals. Added to this, there was no definite knowl- edge furnished by engineers. The settlers on the Wabash were impatient lest the State let the land-grant forfeit. The members from the south opposed, because the State had lost some money on the Ohio Falls canal. The canal committee of the General Assembly of 1828, headed by Samuel Judah of Vincennes, made a lengthy report in favor of canals, and again introduced a bill looking toward con- struction, and again the General Assembly turned them down. Some opposed it because they did not think it nec- 1- This board consisted of Saiimel Haiiua, of Fort Wayne: Kobert John, of Franklin county, and David Burr, of Jaclisou county. The board did nothing more than investigate and report to the next Assem- bly. The Assembly seemingly had gone as far as it could. When it came to expending money, there was a deadlock. The tax levy of the previous year had nettetl $33,000, which barely covered expenses. See Goveraor's Message, December 4, 1S27. The annual message of the Governor may be found in either the House, Semite, or Documentary Journal. 13 Indianapolis Gazette. (24) 358 HISTORY OF INDIANA essary, others because they wanted more definite informa- tion; while a large third party would not run the State into debt for something not absolutely needed. When the surveys commenced, an unexpected trouble arose. Navigable points on the two rivers could not be united without building part of the canal in Ohio. This Indiana could not do. Accordingly, Ohio appointed Willis Silliman its agent to confer with Jeremiah Sullivan with like power from Indiana. The men met in Cincinnati, Oc- tober 3, 1829, and agreed that Ohio should take a part of the land grant and dig that part of the canal within her boundary. ^^ During the following October land sales began at Logansport and Lafayette. The tracts were put up at auc- tion and spirited competition was shown. The prices, how- ever, were a disappointment. The highest prices at Logans- port were $4.06 per acre; lowest, $1.25; average, $1.75. From Lafayette came better reports, lots selling as high as $6 to $9 per acre. Two hundred and thirty-four thou- sand acres had been offered and 41,000 sold in 547 tracts or lots. There were no speculators buying. The people grew more impatient to see digging begin, but the railroad party, under the lead of David Hoover of Wayne county, was strong enough to block the General As- sembly for a whole session. The supplemental acts of 1832 put the project on its feet.^"' Surveyor Joseph Ridgeway 14 Western Sun, January 9. 1830. 1"' Lairi< of Indiana, 1831. ch. 1, 108. We are apt to judge the leaders of this iieriod hastily and accuse them of losing their heads. They did make a gigantic mistake, but there are some mitigating conditions. This venture was considered, and held before the public, ten years before work w.is commenced. Then it was undertaken only in despair of any better means of reaching a market with their produce. A bushel of corn at Indiana])olis was worth 12 to 20 cents. On the river board it was worth 50 cents. An ordinary acre of farm land would produce sixty bushels — a loss on each acre, due to lack of transportation facilities of $18. The loss on one hundred acres was $1.8(M) annually. The State had within its boundaries millions of such acres whose value and usefulness to the State depended on commercial com- munication with the world. Now the nation was offering to donate land worth .$1,000,000 toward a canal whose estimated cost was only $1,100,000, and vest the title in the State. The proposed canal, however, SYSTEMATIC INTERNAL IMPROVEMENTS 359 had prepared final estimates that the canal complete would cost $1,081,970. A canal fund was constituted and placed in charge of three commissioners, known as fund commis- sioners. Money was to be borrowed at six per cent, pledg- ing land, tolls, and the faith of the State. Lands were placed in three classes : The first, to sell at $3.50 ; second, at $2.50; third, at $1.50; and the canal board was to open sales again in October, 1832. Work was ordered com- menced on the canal before March 2, 1832. The canal board began letting contracts March 1, 1832. The canal was divided into sections about one-half mile long, for which the engineers had made full plans and specifications, and then each section was let to the lowest bidder. During the first year thirty-eight contracts were made, covering about twenty miles, and calling for $117,000 in payment. The canal board hired Jesse L. Williams to do its work of supervising construction. The opposition to the canal gradually melted away till 1834, when there was no active trace of it left. It was then accepted as the settled policy of the State. The question with each locality was no longer, how can we oppose the Wabash and Erie, but how can we get a canal for our own county or neighborhood. ^^ Meanwhile the Wabash and Erie crept steadily west- ward from Fort Wayne to the mouth of the Tippecanoe, which was considered the head of navigation for the Wa- bash. The long line of huts resembled barracks to a forti- fied camp; and, if reports are true, the line resembled a camp in another very real way. The diggers were all Irish, and about equally divided between "Corkers" and "Way Downers" from Kerry. Members of the different bands never met without a fight.^" On one occasion four hundred was far to the north of the settled portion of the State, aud could never benetit nine-tenths of the people who were to build it. And it was only on the tacit agi'eeruent that it was to be the first of a system, reaching all parts of the State, that it was undertaken. It is not the undertaking, but the business method that comes in for most censure. There were too many commissioners, engineers, staff officers, land agents, paymasters, finance agents in New York, Baltimore and Boston. 16 See Judge David Kilgore's Speech in Constitutional Convention of 1850. Debates, index. 17 Helm, History of Wahash County, 68. 360 HISTORY OF INDIANA militia were required to stop an impending battle near Lagro, in which four hundred Corkers had armed them- selves and were moving up the line to clean out their ene- mies J ^ The board reported that about 1,000 men had worked on the canal during the summer of 1834. After a careful examination of the Wabash river, the commissioners decided that Lafayette should be its southern terminus, and they had already assumed authority to make preliminary surveys. The canal had cost, thus far, $729,- 000, and to go down to Lafayette, which, they said, was the great steamboat landing and commercial center of that region, would cost nearly $100,000 more. The General As- sembly in 1834 ordered the extension, the canal to cross the Wabash at Ballard's bluff in the pool of a dam. At the Birmingham bluff the canal was to be built out in the river and protected by brush rip-rap.^" By the fourth of July, 1835, boats were running on the section west of Fort Wayne, but the tolls were not enough to keep it in repair. Already the wooden aqueducts were rotten. The State finally finished the line, and on July 4, 1843, it was opened from Lafayette to Toledo. The event was fitly celebrated in an oration at Fort Wayne by Gen. Lewis Cass. § 68 The System of 1836 The opposition to State internal improvement disap- peared with the beginning of active work on the canal. The mania rapidly gathered headway after 1830. The time of the General Assembly was almost entirely taken with such schemes. Reports from all canals built in the east were flattering.-" The Indiana legislature of 1832 incorporated no less than a dozen joint stock companies to build various lines of railroads. These included roads from Lawrenceburg to Indianapolis ; from Madison via Indianapolis to Lafayette ; from Jeffersonville via Salem, Bloomington, Greencastle to Lafayette; from Harrison to Indianapolis via Greensburg and Shelbyville; from Lafayette to Lake Michigan; from iS jjoGumentary Journal, 1835, IS. 19 General Laivs of hidiano. is:!4. eh. IC. 20 iVj7es' Rcfflster. December 1. IS'jri. SYSTEMATIC INTERNAL IMPROVEMENTS 361 Jeffersonville via Columbus, Indianapolis, and due north to the Wabash. These were not the idle dreams of irrespon- sible adventurers, but on their charters are the names of the best men of the State. The years during the presidency of Adams and Jackson were an era of great commercial prosperity in the United States. Every resource was being developed to its utmost. Transportation facilities fell far behind the capacity for production. Seaboard prices remained high and steady. Every section was studying the same problem — how to get to market. New York had finished her great canal, but was eager for a waterway from the Lakes to the Mississippi Valley. As a result of this work, New York City was rap- idly running away from Baltimore and Philadelphia in wealth and population. Pennsylvania was spending vast money to get a canal or railroad through from Philadel- phia to Pittsburgh on the Ohio. Baltimore, in conjunction with Maryland and Virginia, was building a canal and a railroad from the Potomac to the Ohio along the old Brad- dock route. Ohio had taken the suggestion of New York, and had almost completed two magnificent canals from Lake Erie to the Ohio. The echo of all this activity was caught up in the newspapers of Indiana, and her farmers, already producing two and three times as much as could be consumed, read them eagerly. Borrow money was the argument, and build canals.-^ Still, with the sentiment of the State overwhelming for the system, there was a serious political problem to be solved. All realized that there must be some limit to the number of works undertaken. The "Wabash band" were interested in a first-class canal to Lafayette, and a naviga- ble Wabash from there to the Ohio. The Whitewater mem- bers — the strongest of the interests — were sure of their po- sition, but wished to hold the State to as few lines as possible so as to insure a rapid prosecution of the White- water canal. In the absence of well-organized and disci- 21 Governor Noah Noble's Message, House Journal, 1834, 12. See further House Journal, 18.35, 12, where the same idea is advanced more boldly. 362 HISTORY OF INDIANA plined parties, the project was not so easily carried as planned. The session of 1834-35 was spent in vainly try- ing to organize the Assembly on this basis. As finally or- ganized, this party controlled every county in the State but seven — Harrison, Posey, Crawford, Switzerland, Hendricks, Perry, and Spencer — and six of these were on the Ohio.-- The Whitewater canal was the starting point in all these discussions.-^ The settlers in the valley, the most populous district of the State, as early as 1832 had petitioned for a canal. The Assembly of 1833 ordered a preliminary sur- vey, a report of which by Surveyor Gooding was laid be- fore the Assembly December 23, 1834.-4 The valley was reported to be shallow and the fall excessive, requiring a great number of locks. There were many washed banks where the canal would have to be built over the river. The survey began at Nettle creek near Cambridge City in Wayne county, close to the crossing of the old National Road. Thence it passed down the west bank to Somerset at the Franklin county line, where it crossed, recrossing again at Brookville and following the west bank to the Ohio at Lawrenceburg. The length was seventy-six miles, seven dams were necessary, fifty-six locks, and 491 feet of lockage. The estimated cost was $1,142,126. It would give an outlet for Franklin, Rush, Fayette, Henry, Randolph, and Hancock counties, as well as a large part of Wayne, Union, Decatur, and Delaware — a district aggregating 3,150 square miles. Produce could be trans- ported by this means at an average cost of $3.56 per ton as against $10, the present cost. This would save $221,000 for the section each year. The water power would turn 318 pairs of millstones. This argument is given in some detail to show the nature of the discussions that occupied the General Assembly and the newspapers during the dec- ade from 1830 to 1840.-^ 22 Documentary Journal, 1836. No. 5. 23 For :m excellent description of how this hiw was carried, see speech by Judge Kilgore, Debates in Constitutional Convention, 1850, index. 24 House Journal, 1834, 255. 25 House Journal. 344. This is a good summary of the argument for and against canals as they viewed them at that time. SYSTEMATIC INTERNAL IMPROVEMENTS 363 The time of the session of 1834 was taken by the As- sembly in framing a bill for a general system of improve- ments. It developed into a game of legislative seesaw with the Whitewater canal as its center. Every member was willing to vote for the latter provided his own county was not neglected. No system could be determined which it was thought the State could build. When the Assembly of 1835 met, it at once went to work on the unfinished bill. The only fight left over was on the route from Vincennes to New Albany. The influence of the lobby prevailed, how- ever, and it was included. As a study of the political activity of the times the agi- tation for this road is worth noting. The movement was started by a letter signed "Knox" in the Western Sun in the early summer of 1835. Acting on the suggestion, the citizens of Daviess county met in mass meeting at the courthouse in Washington October 5, and appointed dele- gates to meet similarly appointed delegates from all other counties interested, at Paoli October 26, to deliberate on the affair of a turnpike road.-^'- After due discussion it was decided to send a lobby to the General Assembly, con- sisting of one man from each county. It was further de- cided to work for a macadam road. Petitions were pre- pared to be circulated in each county, and a committee of twenty appointed to present this united petition.-' The agitation that backed each route provided by the pending bill was similar to the above, though usually stronger and more insistent. On January 27, 1836, Governor Noah Noble signed the Mammoth Internal Improvement Bill.-'^ Taken in all its aspects, its consequences immediate and remote, it was the most important measure ever signed by an Indiana gov- ernor. It carried appropriations aggregating $13,000,000, or one-sixth of the wealth of the State at that time, fixing the policy and mortgaging the resources of the State for half a century. The act provided that the governor, by 26 Western Sun, October 10, 183.^. 27 iMd., October 31. 1.8.35. 28 General Laws of Indiana, 1835, ch. 2. 364 HISTORY OF INDIANA and with the consent of the senate, should appoint six men to act with the canal board already appointed. These men were to serve three years, except that one-third of the first appointees were to serve one year, one-third two years. The governor in making appointments was to have regard to local situations so that one member should be near each work. This board was to locate and superintend the works provided for, meet semi-annually, and make a detailed re- port to the General Assembly every session. Aside from necessary expenses, each member was to receive $2 for every day actually and necessarily employed. This board was to take such measures as were necessary to commence, construct, and complete the following works: 1. The Whitewater Canal over the route formerly des- ignated. Also a canal to connect the Whitewater with the Central, from some point near the National Road to some point in Madison or Delaware county if possible ; if a canal could not be built, then connect them by a railroad. For these the sum of $1,400,000 was appropriated. 2. The Central Canal, commencing at the most suitable point on the Wabash between Fort Wayne and Logansport, via Muncietown, to Indianapolis, down White river to the forks ; thence by the best route to Evansville. Provided : The board may select the Pipe Creek route and build a feeder to Muncie if thought best. Appropriation $3,500,000. 3. An extension of the Wabash and Erie Canal from Tippecanoe river down to Terre Haute, thence by Eel river to the Central ; or, if the board think best, strike the Cen- tral at the mouth of Black creek, in Knox county. Ap- propriation $1,300,000. 4. A railroad from Madison, through Columbus, In- dianapolis, to Lafayette. Appropriation, $1,300,000. 5. A macadamized turnpike from New Albany, through Greenville, Fredericksburg, Paoli, Mt. Pleasant, Washing- ton, to Vincennes; $1,150,000 appropriated. 6. A resurvey of the route from Jeffersonville via New Albany, Salem, Bedford, Bloomington, Greencastle, to Crawfordsville, to be made before next October. If it be SYSTEMATIC INTERNAL IMPROVEMENTS 365 found practicable, construct a railroad, if not a macadam- ized road; for which $1,300,000 was appropriated. 7. Fifty thousand dollars was set aside for removing the obstructions in the Wabash. 8. A survey of a canal if possible, if not, a railroad, from the Wabash and Erie near Fort Wayne, via Goshen, South Bend, Laporte, to the lake at Michigan City. This was to be commenced within ten years. A general fund was provided, to consist of all moneys raised from sale of State bonds, from loans, grants, profits, appropriations, tolls, and rents. The fund commis- sioners were authorized to borrow $10,000,000 on twenty- five years' time, at six per cent. For the payment of this loan, principal and interest, there were pledged, the canals, railroads, turnpikes, all grounds, rents, tolls, and profits, to the sufificiency of which there was pledged the faith of the State. The right of eminent domain was given the board, and it was authorized to purchase for the State any lands made especially valuable by the works ; though no member could buy land for himself within one mile of a canal. The Indianapolis and Lawrenceburg railroad was given the right to borrow $500,000 on the credit of the State, giving by v/ay of security to the State a mortgage on wild lands. Finally, the State pledged itself to build each and all lines with all haste possible. The news of the passage of the bill was received with every demonstration of joy. Illuminations, addresses, and bonfires were the order in every city and town from Evans- ville to Fort Wayne. Not only in Indiana, but from Bos- ton to New Orleans, the enterprise and spirit of the young State were applauded. The immediate effect of the meas- ure was to boom every town on the line and cause many new ones to spring up — on paper. Thousands of town lots were thrown on the market at the ridiculously low prices of $50 to $200 each ; although the land, in many cases, had been bought within the year for $3 per acre. 366 . HISTORY OF INDIANA § 69 Construction of Canals and Roads Pursuant to the act, Governor Noble appointed Samuel Hall, of Gibson ; Thomas H. Blake, of Vigo ; David H. Max- well, of Monroe; John G. Clendennin, of Orange; John Woodburn, of Jefferson ; and Eliza Long, of Wayne county, as the six new members of the board of internal improve- ments. The board met at Indianapolis March 7, 1836, with all present but Judge Hall. Maxwell was chosen chairman unanimously. The board appointed Jesse L. Williams en- gineer, and requested the fund commissioners to place a loan of $2,000,000. After deciding what sections should be put under contract, the work was distributed so that each member had the work nearest his home under his supervision.-'-' The meeting was anything but harmonious. The scram- ble for the lion's share of the money began as soon as the first meeting was called to order. Each commissioner seemed to be interested alone in getting his work completed as soon as possible. An engineer in chief for canals and an engineer in chief for railroads were hired in addition to a resident engineer, and full corps of surveyors for each line.-'" The total number of these latter, many of whose positions were sinecures, was about seventy-five, at an av- erage annual expense to the State of $54,000. This body of workmen was popularly known as the "Eating Brigade."-' After deciding on the general policy of putting only those lines under contract that would soonest yield a reve- nue, the board ordered work to be commenced as follows: Whitewater, from Lawrenceburg to Brookville, the home of Mr. Long; twenty-two miles of Madison railroad, out of 29 Annual Report, Documcntanj JournaJ. 1836. 30 They appointed as resident enjiineers: Chief, .Jesse L. Williams; for roads, Henry M. Pettit: eastern end of Wab.'.sh and Erie, Stearns Fisher; central part of Wabash and Erie, L. B. Wilson: western part, Anderson Davis; Whitewater. Simpson Torbert : Indianapolis line, T. A. Morris; Evansville line. C. G. Voorhies; Cross Cut, W. I. Ball; Fall Creek and Erie and Michigan, Solomon Holman ; .Teffersonville and Crawfordsville. R. H. Fauntleroy; Madison railroad, E. M. Beckwith; New Albany, Vineennes line, John Eraser. 31 John Dumont, in Recollections of Early Settlements of Carroll County, 152. SYSTEMATIC INTERNAL IMPROVEMENTS 367 Madison; the Wabash and Erie, west to Lafayette; the Cross-Cut Canal, from Terre Haute to Eel river; the Cen- tral Canal, along Pigeon creek to Evansville; bridges and grading on Vincennes-New Albany turnpike; Central Canal from the feeder above Indianapolis to Port Royal Bluffs; and twenty miles of the Jeffersonville and Craw- fordsville road. This policy had nothing to back it but the selfish greed of the members of the board. Work had scarcely begun before a hampering criticism of everything connected with improvements was com- menced by the people and the legislature.^^ A powerful party in the legislature insisted on "classi- fication" — building a single line at a time — but no two sec- tions could unite on what line to build first. The first an- nual report of the board prophesied plainly the final fail- ure of the system. After reciting that "The system sprung from the reciprocal confidence, harmonious understanding and cooperation of the different sections," the board re- ported that scarcity of labor had prevented them from plac- ing many contracts. The contractors in different sections were bidding against each other for laborers and attempt- ing to lure away by extra inducements the better hands."^ The people, once the digging was begun, and they saw the many weary years necessary to complete the work, soon awoke from the trance of the canal orator. The land policy of the State and nation, by allowing any one to buy land for a trifle on seventeen years' credit, drew the more enter- prising men away from labor on the works. Above all, the character of the improvements to be made on several lines was still unsettled. Should they build a pike or a railroad on the Madison line? If a railroad, a single or a double track? Should the New Albany-Greencastle line be a pike, railroad or macadam? A special surveyor was or- dered, who spent one year on the latter line, and still there was uncertainty. The same question hung over the Vin- cennes-New Albany line. A large party was at work in the woods and swamps of the northern part of the State 32 Western Sun, J.iuuary 2, 18.86. 33 Documentunj Journal, 1837. 368 HISTORY OF INDIANA trying to settle the question of canal or railroad from Fort Wayne to Lake Michigan, The same question was yet to be solved on the connecting line from Richmond to Muncie.^^ Illinois and Michigan were engaged in similar systems and drawing heavily on the labor supply, as well as flood- ing eastern markets with bonds. The "System" orators had not only promised there would be no higher taxation, but that soon there would no need of a State levy at all, as tolls would pay all. Consequently the General Assembly made no provision for interest. During the first year ex- penses mounted up to millions ($3,827,000), and the inter- est had to be paid from loans.^"^ But Governor Wallace as- sured everybody that the outlook was glorious, plenty of money among the people, although eastern banks were fail- ing. During the year 1837 over $1,500,000 was expended, not including $34,000 for surveyors, or $70,000 for officers' expenses. Ten separate routes had been surveyed and ninety-eight surveyors were continually in the woods. During the year 1838, $1,693,000 was spent for digging, with usual incidentals, not including $170,000 for interest, which put the total near $2,000,000.3" On January 24, 1839; Caleb Smith, the fund commissioner, reported that he had expended $5,000,000. Governor Wallace, in his message of December 4, 1838, draws a distressing picture. The interest then due was $193,350, the revenue of the State was $45,000 from taxation, from total taxable property of $146,850,000. "If this condition," said the governor, "does not startle us, it should at least awaken us." The governor assured the General Assembly, though, that if it would borrow money and invest in bank stock, the State would realize enough to pay out. The opponents of the improvement system gradually got the attention of the State. The question of reorganiza- tion and classification was raised in 1838, but without re- sult. The next General Assembly abolished the whole 3^ Engineers' Report, Docutnentanj Journal, 1837 (not paged) 35 Report of Board, Doenmcntary Journal, 1837. ^^Documentary Journal, 1838, No. 22. SYSTEMATIC INTERNAL IMPROVEMENTS 369 organization and placed the financial affairs in the hands of two men, each under $100,000 bond.^' The internal im- provement board was reduced to three members, with or- ders to classify works and build one at a time. But the act came too late. The State was a bankrupt beyond the power of any remedial law. The system finally broke down in August, 1839, when the board ordered all work to cease. The State at this time seemed to recover consciousness, and began to take stock of its condition. The work on the Whitewater Canal had commenced first. A big celebration at Brookville September 13, 1836, at which David Wallace, Governor Noble and Ex-Governor Ray were the orators, ushered in the undertaking. •='' The work was always pushed more than any other, on account of the great bulk of the population of the State being in that valley. Nine hundred and seventy-five men were employed, and the manager was sure the same force would finish the work in two seasons. December 20, 1838, Superintendent Long reported the canal well-nigh complete to Brookville.''"' This line was practically finished when the failure of the State required a cessation of work, notice of which was given by Noah Noble, president of the board, August 18, 1839.^" In June of this same year, boats had been run as far up as Brookville. It will be noticed that the original appropriation for the 116 miles was $1,400,000, the original estimate $1,700,- 000, and the final estimates over $2,000,000. During its first six months of operation $670 in tolls was collected. During this same period the gross receipts on the Wabash and Erie were $4,284 — enough to pay interest on about $70,000, and not nearly enough for repair expenses. Pursuant to the law of 1834, J. L. Williams surveyed the route for the Central Canal in the summer of 1835. The plans called for a cut forty feet wide at the surface of the 37 Latvs of Indiana, 1S38, ch. 16. 38 History of Dearborn and Ohio Counties, index. 39 Senate Journal, 18.38. 2r.6. 40 Senate Journal, 1839, 144. 370 HISTORY OF INDIANA water, twenty-six feet at the bottom, and four feet deep. Six different locations were made. The surveys show the hesitancy and lack of knowledge that hindered all the works. During all the summer of 1836 surveying contin- ued along the line. The Indianapolis division was laid off from the dam at Broad Ripple to Port Royal Bluff, twenty- four miles. Also the southern division along Pigeon creek in Vanderburg county, and the Cross Cut at Eel river from Terre Haute to Point Commerce, were laid down. During 1836-37, forty-five miles were put under con- tract at $611,336. Seven hundred and fifty men were at work on the Indianapolis division. When work was sus- pended by the State, eight miles of the section from In- dianapolis to Muncie were finished, sixteen miles immedi- ately south of the capital, and nineteen miles on Pigeon creek. These sections, together with the Cross Cut, no part of which was ready to have water turned in, had cost the State $1,820,026. A humorous predicament of the Pigeon Creek section was that, when it was finished. Pigeon creek, which was supposed to feed it, was dry.^^ By the close of 1841 the State had expended $156,323 on the line from Fort Wayne to Lake Michigan, for which they had nothing to show but a wagon load of surveyors' field notes. The Vincennes-New Albany route was surveyed during the summer of 1834 by Collins & Watt.^- The length was 105 miles and the grading was estimated at $4,300 per mile; ballasting, $10,878; total cost of line, $1,590,747. Work commenced promptly and $654,411 was expended. The road was built as far west as Paoli, forty-one miles, and twenty-seven miles more were graded. This work proved of considerable local benefit, and under such super- intendents as John Frazier, 1844-47, Michael Riley, 1848, and Joel Vandeveer, 1850, enough tolls were collected to 41 Senate Journal. 1S41. 13. See Dncumentarn Jonrnal, 1835, No. 8, Report of Engineer. ^- Documentarii Journal. 1835, or Senate Journal. 1835. 213. The surveyors hnd just graduated that year from Indiana College. SYSTEMATIC INTERNAL IMPROVEMENTS 371 keep it in tolerable condition. ^'= It never paid a dollar of revenue to the State. Among the routes ordered surveyed by the Assembly of 1834 was the New Albany-Crawfordsville route, and there- after the State confined its efforts in this section to this line — from New Albany, via Salem, Bedford, Bloomington and Greencastle, to Crawfordsville. Howard Stansbury was in charge of the preliminary survey.^^ The actual work was done by Edward Watts, John P. Paul and Fitz- hugh Coyle. The line was 158 miles long and the total cost of "graduation" estimated at $628,581. This meant only an ordinary dirt road. During the summer of 1838, Surveyor Fontleroy was hired to survey the road with a view to building a railroad, which Commissioner Maxwell favored. The report was favorable, but the improvement board was not satisfied and ordered Jesse Williams, aided by expert railroad engineers, Forrer from Ohio and Welch from Kentucky, to resurvey. These men reported that a macadam road would cost about $2,000,000, and a railroad about $7,000,000.^-' The controversy was finally ended by an act of the General Assembly, January 25, 1838, which directed the board to build a macadam road.^^ Work was not pushed on this line as on the others. Superintendent Maxwell seems to have had no faith in it. When work was suspended he had expended only $372,733 and had partly graded the sections from Salem south and from Greencastle north. Most of the money went to surveyors. Four different squads had spent as many seasons on it, and had agreed on nothing. The evidence seems to indicate that hunting and fishing were more congenial than surveying. Of all improvements of the State this line was conducted with least hopes of success. As has been stated above, there was a great rush for railroad charters during the years 1831-'32-'33. The be- 43 Reports are foiuid in Indiana Pamphlets, vol. 2. Nos. 4 to 14, inclusive. ^'i Documentary Journal, 1835, No. 11, or Senate Journals, 1835, 115. 45 Documentary Journal, 1837, No. 19. 46 Revised Statutes, 1838, 354. 372 HISTORY OF INDIANA lief was general that the problem of travel and transpor- tation had been solved. Long lines such as the Buffalo and Mississippi and the Charleston, Cincinnati and Chi- cago were projected. The plans were discussed in inter- state railroad conventions. At this time a charter was obtained for the road from Madison to Lafayette. During the years 1834-'35-'36 there was a reversal in public opin- ion, and a railroad came to be regarded as practicable only when a canal or pike was impossible. During the summer of 1835 Mr. Gooding surveyed for the State a line for a canal from Indianapolis to Jefferson- ville.^''' One object of this canal was to furnish a way around the Falls, since it was to have two outlets — one above and one below. There were many obstacles to the construction, but Mr. Gooding finally found a feasible route and estimated the cost at $3,580,000. The cost staggered even that credulous General Assembly and they gave up this line with the consolation, however, that it would soon be built. In the meantime, Edwin Schenck had finished a survey for the Madison railroad. On this road he estimated that a four and one-half ton locomotive could draw thirty-six tons six miles per hour; or one horse, three and one-half tons, five miles. It was not decided what motor power would be used. Covered vv'ooden bridges were called for in the plans. Flat rails from Liverpool were estimated at $49 per ton, edge rails at $59. The bluff at Madison was to be climbed on an incline by means of a windlass. The length of the road was 144 miles, and the first estimates of cost were $1,666,797. Mr. Williams, chief engineer for the State, during the seasons of 1836-'37 kept a squad of surveyors on the line from Madison to Lafayette, and on January 30, 1838, after the State had spent $445,000, advised the legislature to abandon the railroad and build a pike.^'^ When work was stopped on the road, twentj^-eight and one-half miles were completed at a cost of $1,493,013. The northern end had 4T t5,0tK); cash, $14,715; bonds for Win- chester and Pontiac Railroad for $46,644; 751 shares of stoclt in the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad for $26,00<); 1,0(M) shares in American IJfe and Trust Company; .")»ut shares in tbe (leneral Insurance Com- pany, and 230 shares in the Canton Company, all for $50,000; a sec- ond mortgage on 52 lots in the city of Brooklyn, with a sperm and caudle factory, at $65,000; second mortgage on 565 lots in the second ward of New York City and 14 acres of laud in I'oughkeepsie for $60,- 000; an interest in some mining stock for $1,000. It is unnecessary to s.iy this was all worthless ])roperty. Indiana's Bonded Debt in 1841 Date of Inter- Sale Still Loan. Amount. To Whom Sold. est. Price. Cash. Due. 1832 $10(».000 J. D. Beers Company .06 113 $113,260 1834 500.000 Prime, Ward & King___ .05 101 505.250 1835 300,000 Prime. Ward & King .05 102 :!06.150 1835 65.257 Secretary of War .05 107 69,825 1835 200.(K)0 J. J. Cohen & Bi-o .05 105 210,000 1835 400.0othecated." This list of the State's property furnishetl much amusement for facetious members. It included among others: Winchester & Potomac railroad bonds for $44,000; Baltimore & Ohio, and Baltimore & Susquehanna railroad bonds for $78,880; second mort- gage on 184 New York City lots, $25,000; second mortgage on forty- eight Brooklyn lots. $150,000; second mortgage on land in Poughkeepsie, $30,000; debts on wildcat banks of western New York. $240,000; Detroit & Potomac railroad bonds. $90,000; Erie Company Bank, $587,000; Bing- hampton Bank. .$.58,200; Hiram Pr.-itt. $35,600. (See table opp. p. 75. Doc.umeni(inj Journal, lS41-'02. ) SYSTEMATIC INTERNAL IMPROVEMENTS 379 Lafayette to Lake Erie, in 1843, and everything indicated that it would be a useful and money-making property. The people, as well as their creditors, had looked forward hope- fully to the opening of the canal to the lake. They ex- pected an income from it that would go far toward reliev- ing the State of its financial troubles. The bondholders, who had received no interest on their bonds for three years, expected to receive their interest again regularly. Both parties were disappointed. Although the tolls did increase five hundred per cent, they still fell short of paying the running expenses of the canal. The year 1844 brought no brighter prospects. A flood closed the canal for two months. The receipts for the year fell far short of repair expenditures, and the bondholders saw this hope depart, as all others, without bringing any money. The General Assembly of Indiana and many of the citizens were loud in their protestations of honesty, and there is no doubt public sentiment favored the ultimate payment of every dollar of the State debt. Governor Whit- comb said in his messages of 1844 and 1845, that the great mass of our fellow citizens were willing and anxious to meet all their just obligations. That with them it was not a matter of inclination, but one of ability.*^* That some arrangement would be made with their creditors and the tarnished reputation of their State restored, he would not permit himself to doubt. By a joint resolution January 13, 1845, the General Assembly solemnly expressed its opinion on repudiation: "We regard the slightest breach of plighted faith, public or private, as an evidence of a want of that moral principle upon which all obligations depend: that when any State in this Union shall refuse to recognize her great seal as the sufficient evidence of her obligation she will have for- feited her station in the sisterhood of States and will no longer be worthy of their respect and confidence." The governor was directed to transmit copies of this resolu- tion to all the States.*''^ ^s House Journal, 1845, 19. ^^ Laws of Indiana, 1844, 92. On the other hand, in this same lues- 380 HISTORY OF INDIANA In speaking of all these fulsome protestations, State Auditor Horatio J. Harris said : "It would be fortunate for the reputation of the State as well as gratifying to her creditors should this evidence consist hereafter of some definite action, rather than general expressions of legis- lative opinions," Not one of these demagogues who ha- rangued about State honor ever showed enough courage to vote a measure to retrieve the State's honor. They feared the sullen resentment of the outraged citizen voters who felt that somehow the State had been swindled and that it did not justly owe the debt. Relying on this sentiment, widely and loudly expressed, and still hopeful of getting their money, the bondholders banded together and hired Charles Butler, an attorney of New York, to look after their claims. After visiting Michi- gan on a like mission, he reached Indiana in the summer of 1845.'" His plan was to rally the anti-repudiation sentiment by means of a series of public addresses. He recognized it as useless to demand an immediate and un- conditional payment of the bonds. The resources of the State and the condition of the currency, demoralized by floods of treasury notes, bank scrip, "white dog," "blue dog," and "blue pup," all depreciated from forty to sixty per cent, vv^ere such that it is doubtful if this could have been done. He began then by flattering the people on the Wabash with the hopes of finishing that canal to the Ohio river. Whether he believed the canal, so improved, would be a paying property, or whether he wished merely to re- vive the courage of the people, is not known. In the face of the facts as he knew them, the latter seems to have been his intention, hoping in the future to get the State snge, pjige IS, the (Tovernor s;iys: "The opinion has hitherto been near- ly, if not quite, universally held anion.i;' our citizens, as well as others acquainted with our cojiditions and resources, that it is beyond the power of our State, at present, to fully meet our obli.srations. Even the plan submitted at our last session of the Senate, virtually made that con- cession b.v proposing to convert our bonds, bearing tive per cent, interest, into a stock bearing only tliree. No ]ilan that has been mooted for a resumption of payment, even the most stringent, has contemplated a full and immediate payment." 'i'o Indiana Dcniocrat, Dec, 1845. SYSTEMATIC INTERNAL IMPROVEMENTS 381 to pay the bonds in full and take charge of the finished canal. He began his campaign at Terre Haute, where in an address in May, 1845, he proposed to divide the interest on the State debt into two parts, one of which should be paid by the State, the other from the revenues of the canal. These views were transmitted to the General Assembly in a memorial. The question of the settlement of the debt had some influence on the fall elections, but not so much as was hoped. There was a general restlessness among the people, under the charges of repudiation then being made against the State, but no sweeping sentiment for full payment could be aroused. It was arranged to have Mr. Butler meet a joint com- mittee of the General Assembly, as it was understood he had a specific proposition to make. On December 19, Mr. Butler met the committee and he submitted his plan as follows : 1. For arrears of interest, the State should give certifi- cates payable by 1851 ; or if not paid then, to be funded into five per cent stocks. 2. The State should pay, by taxation, three per cent interest on the debt up to 1851. 3. All arrears of interest up to 1851 to be funded at five per cent. After 1851, three per cent interest to be paid promptly by tax and two per cent from tolls of the canal. It w^as understood that the State was to finish the canal to the Ohio river.^^ In a message, December 27, 1845, the governor urged the General Assembly to accept Butler's proposition. It would place the credit of the State on a certain basis ; it would aid returning prosperity; it would turn the tide of settlement to our State again, thought the governor. ''■- It did not take the joint committee long to come to an agreement. On Christmas day it notified Mr. Butler that it could not accede to his demands and inquired if he had 71 Iiidiana Dciiiocrat, Dec. 23, 1845. Also Dcctiineiitiinj Journal, 1845, pt. IT, No. 21. Ti Documentary Journal, 1845, No. 8, 18. 382 HISTORY OF INDIANA anything better to propose. The attitude of the committee was not at all creditable. They seemed to be negotiating for a bargain with their own creditors rather than trying to uphold the honor of the State. The next day Mr. Butler was again before the com- mittee and made what is known as his second proposition. It differed very little from the first. Elaborate tables were submitted showing how the State could meet all its obliga- tions. One could not fail to agree with Butler, that the State was able to meet all its obligations honorably, except for two reasons. These were, first, the demoralized con- dition of the currency, and second, the leadership of a clique of oily politicians. Neither of these reasons is credit- able to the State. A State levy of 70 cents would have paid principal and interest. Ohio was meeting her debt in that way. Indiana would have done no less had her General Assembly risen to the occasion. A bill was finally drawn along the lines of Butlers propositions and introduced in the Senate by Joseph Lane'" — the same man who had declared he would cut cordwood to pay his part of the debt. The measure en- grossed the attention of the Assembly completely. The House was Democratic, the Senate Whig. There was little straightforward policy manifested in either branch. Both parties finally agreed to postpone action on the bill till after the party conventions on January 9. Even after both parties in convention had endorsed the Butler bill, the Democrats in caucus decided to refer the whole matter to the people in the August elections. The governor and leaders of the party succeeded in breaking the Democratic caucus. January 19, 1846, Governor James Whitcomb at- tached his signature to the bill. General satisfaction was felt no doubt, throughout the State at what was felt to be a final adjustment of the State debt. Butler left for New York, February 20, and the New York papers generally expressed approval of the settle- ment."^ The long law of thirty-five sections was very care- ts jntZiana Democrat, .Ian. 6. 1846. "-• Indiana Dcmocnit. April 14. 1846. SYSTEMATIC INTERNAL IMPROVEMENTS 383 lessly drawn, and was soon found to be impossible of execution.'^ ^'' The bondholders had lost enough money with- out investing the $2,225,000 called for under the law. No bonds were surrendered under it. When the General Assembly convened again in Decem- ber, 1846, Mr. Butler was on the ground demanding some amendments. A bill purporting to be an amendment was drawn, and after a long struggle received the governor's approval January 27, 1847."^ The new bill was founded on the option contained in the thirty-second section of the previous law. Its general effect was to divide the outstand- ing bonds of the State, except those known as the Bank bonds, into two equal parts. One of these parts, with its accumulated interest, was assumed by the State, and the other was made a debt on the canal for which the State assumed no further responsibility. The canal was deeded to the bondholders and they were forced to accept the compromise.'^" "i^ It provided that the bonded debt should be refunded entirely. The old five per cent bonds were to be surrendered and in their stead new State registered stocks created. First, there should be issued State two and one-half per cent twenty-year registered bonds equal in amount to the face of the old bonds. Second, the arrears of interest should be funded, at the rate of two and one-half per cent from 1S41 to 1S47. in- clusive, in like bonds as the principal. The State agreed to pay interest on the above bonds at the rate of two per cent if a State tax levy of 25 cents on the $100 and a poll tax of 75 cents should furnish sufficient funds after the ordinary State exi)enses were paid. The remaining one- half per cent and any arrears by reason of the failure of the above tax levy to bring in suflBcient revenue were to be funded or paid as the State should choose January 1. 1S53. P'or the payment of the remaining two and one-half per cent of annual interest the bondholders were to look entirely to the Wabash and Erie canal. In order that the canal might be more productive, the bondholders were given permission to raise a sum of not less than $2,225,000 to complete the canal to the Ohio river. The canal was to be placed in trust by the State, and its earnings and land grants set aside and pledged to the payment of the bondholders. These last loans were not to become a debt chargeable against the State, though in this law the State remained pledged to pay the principal of the entire State debt. "t^ Laics of Indiana, 1S46. eh. 1. Benton (WahasJi Trade Route. 73) calls this bill a "few minor modifications." and leaves the impression that there was no opposition worth considering. In fact, the fight on this was longer and more acrid than on the other. 77 The conditions of the compromise close with the following notice 384 HISTORY OF INDIANA The outstanding bonded debt of the State July 1, 1847, was $11,048,000.''' These bonds were held in New York and London and the debt was always referred to as the foreign debt, in distinction from the State scrip and treasury notes, which were called the domestic or floating debt. The inter- est on the bonds had not been paid for six years, and the arrears added to the principal brought the total foreign debt up to $13,120,692. If Indiana can be charged with repudiation, it must be done on account of this law of 1847. No one will for a moment contend that the bondholders would have pre- ferred the arrangement of 1847 to the payment of the bonds according to their tenor. The bonds at this time were never quoted higher than thirty cents on the dollar. Yet they were not depreciated more than the debt which the United States paid in 1789. Even at thirty cents, men like John Jacob Astor and the elder Belmont bought In- diana bonds and exchanged them for the new five per cent stocks, and made a good profit. Two facts stand out promi- nently. The State made a bargain with its creditors, and its creditors lost half their invested money. Two parties were deeply wronged : the persons who had invested their earnings in State bonds expecting to enjoy in their old age the comforts of a certain income;''' and the citizens of Indiana who had entrusted their credit and honor to their government, and had been robbed of both. For it cannot to the bondbolders : "Tbe St.-ite will iii.ikc no ]irovision bereifter to priy eitber priiicii);il or interest on any internal ini])roveuient bonds luitil tbe bolder shall tirst have surrenderefl such bonds to the agent of the State and shall have received in lieu thereof certificates of stock as pro- vided in tbe fii'st section of this act. Anythinsr in this act to the con- trary notwithstanding." This proviso makes the law of 1847 very dif- ferent from tbe harmless one of 184(5. It must also be kept in mind that the provisions of this law are not the same as those laid down in Butler's first or second proposals. T^ Docunioiinry Journal. 1847. 102. Reiiort of Agent of State. T^ Documentarj/ Jounuil, 184.5, pt. 11, 27.S. A memorial from the New York Savings Bank. This pictures some of the suffering caused b.v tbe State's failure to pay its interest promptly. See also letters from foreign cieditors to Governor AVhitcomb, Indiaiuvpolis ffcntinch June 17, 1842. See also Documentary Journal, 1844, pt. I, No. 5, IndianO/polis Sentinel, June 17, 1842. SYSTEMATIC INTERNAL IMPROVEMENTS 385 be denied that the reputation of Indiana suffered greatly in this transaction. Nearly all the Indiana bonds then out- standing had been taken out of the State's hands wrong- fully by being sold on credit in the face of a law to the contrary. More than one-third of the bonds had been se- cured from the State in the first instance by criminal col- lusion, the agent of the State being at the same time a member of the firm of brokers who took the bonds, sold them, and failed to pay the State the proceeds. The State of Michigan was similarly swindled, and promptly repudi- ated the bonds so obtained. This step was seriously con- sidered in the Indiana legislature during the session of 1845-'46, and might have been done but for the opinion of the State agent, Michael G. Bright, who advised the Gen- eral Assembly against it. The correspondence of the gov- ernor for years afterward contains evidences of the bit- terness of the bondholders on this subject. § 71 Finishing the Wabash and Erie Canal The act of January 28, 1842, as indicated above, left the Wabash and Erie east of Lafayette in the hands of a com- missioner selected by the General Assembly. An act of January 1, 1842, had already provided for building the canal on down to Terre Haute. The commissioner was di- rected to let contracts for as much of it every session as could be paid for with available funds. To expedite mat- ters as much as possible, canal scrip was to be issued. This scrip was made receivable at the canal land offices in pay- ment for the lands donated under act of Congress March 2, 1827, and confirmed by act of February, 1841. By a later act this scrip was made receivable for all tolls, water rents, and other dues to the canal. As the canal crept slowly southward more lands were made available, under the grant of 1827. Work proceeded slowly. Tolls failed to do more than pay for repairs.'"^ Superintendent E. F. Lucas reported receipts for land during the year 1844, as $85,855; tolls and rents, $58,212; expenses, $94,466. It »•' Coiuuiissioner's Iteport. Ducumcntary Journal, 1843. 386 HISTORY OF INDIANA is reported that a single flood caused most of this extra- ordinary expense. In spite of all obstacles the canal was pushed steadily downward to Terre Haute. For 1845, the tolls were $95,473 ; income from land sales, $108,943 ; while the expense for repairs was $106,344.'^^ During this season the canal was short of water a great part of the time. This was to be supplied partly by the feeder at Northport.s- Business was reviving rapidly and there was every indication of prosperity in the transportation business. But the rotten condition of the wooden aque- ducts and inadequate supply of water from the feeders did not promise so well for the canal. In 1844, the canal had been placed under a single superintendent for its whole length. A considerable export trade was growing up. Docks, warehouses, and elevators were springing up over night at Logansport, Attica, Peru, Lafayette, Huntington, Lagro, Pittsburg, Lockport, Wabash, Fort Wayne, and Montezuma, not to mention a score of lesser towns long since disap- peared and forgotten. All kinds of craft swarmed on the canal. July 2, 1845, the surveyor, R. H. Fontleroy, was ordered by Governor Whitcomb to finish surveying the canal down to Evansville. He accordingly began the survey at the summit of the Eel River canal. To get water at this place was the most troublesome problem on the whole line from Lake Erie to the Ohio. A feeder was planned at Rawley's Mill. Next, it was decided to dam Splunge creek. This would require an embankment one mile long and fifteen feet high. This dam was made twenty feet wide on top so that it could be used as a wagon road. The reservoir thus formed would cover 3,900 acres and hold one billion cubic feet of water. A second reservoir was planned and surveyed high up Eel river, near Monrovia, in Morgan county. The 81 Documenlani Journal. 1845. No. 17. 82 An excellent description of the work at Northport was furnished the writer by Miss Anna Caseley, of the Kendallville High School. Her paper (History of Sylvan Lake and Vicinity) ought to be published. The Northport reservoir was at Rome City, Noble county. SYSTEMATIC INTERNAL IMPROVEMENTS 387 Monrovia reservoir was to cover 3,500 acres. From Raw- ley's Mill the canal survey was continued down the bank of Eel river. This was the third canal site that had been laid down along this river. At Point Commerce it con- nected with the Central survey down White river.^- The canal crossed White river at Newberry. Skirting the east- ern edge of the White River Valley, it crossed Daviess county, touching Maysville. It crossed Driftwood on an aqueduct one mile from its mouth. It left White river and passed by way of Petersburg, Pigeon Summit and Pigeon creek to Evansville. This was the work undertaken by the bondholders under the Butler bill. The surveyor placed the total cost at $2,502,813, of which $966,544 had already been expended. The canal was in operation by 1847, as far down as Coal creek near Cayuga, thirty-six miles above Terre Haute. The water was insufficient below Lafayette and feeders had to be constructed, one at St. Mary's and another eight miles west of Logansport at Crooked creek. The whole canal from Lake Erie to the Ohio was 458 miles long. The board hoped to have the whole line to Evansville under construction by 1850.^^ During the year 1848 there v/ere 189 miles of canal in use, extending from Coal creek to the Ohio State line. Ninety-six miles of construction were under contract. One thousand seven hundred eighty men were at work, scattered from Coal creek to Patoka Sum- mit. Three hundred and forty-two thousand dollars were expended for construction, and $35,000 for repairs. Tolls had arisen to $146,148. The work was not successful during 1849, although the board began in the spring with more than ordinary vigor. A flood during the winter caused $31,600 damage on the Eel River section. Contracts were let at Washington, Daviess county, June 27, 1849, for the section from New- berry to Maysville — twenty-three miles — for $160,000. The construction from Maysville to Petersburg — twenty miles — was placed under contract at Petersburg, November 14, ^^Documentary Journal, 1S45, No. 17. 2. 84 Documentary Journal, 1847, pt. II, No. 6. 388 HISTORY OF INDIANA for $278,000. The canal was opened to commerce from the Ohio line to Lodi. But the prosperity of the early part of the season was not to last. Cholera broke out in several places along the canal, especially at Toledo and Lafayette. The plague affected the canal in every direction. It stopped the sales of land, it cut the tolls to $135,000, $11,000 below the previous year, although a long stretch of canal was opened for the first time. It demoralized the con- struction gangs, and, finally, it killed trustee Thomas H. Blake at Cincinnati as he was returning from Washing- ton, D. C, on business for the canal.''"' For the season of 1850 the canal opened March 18, and closed December 8 — 261 days. During this time there was no interruption. The long delayed hopes of the promoters seemed at last about to be realized. Boats arrived at Lodi, October 25, 1849 ; they passed the Eel River division to Point Commerce and Washington, June 7, 1850. This lat- ter point is seventy-nine miles from Coal Creek, 268 miles from the State line, and 352 miles from Toledo. The last section, from Petersburg to Evansville, was placed under contract September 6, 1850, and was to be completed in 1852. This year the cholera broke out among the work- men and killed 150 men. A panic set in and the fleeing workmen carried the plague all over the country. The tolls this year ran up to $157,158, a gain of $22,500. The whole canal was closed for a full month during the season of 1851, on account of floods. Notwithstanding this, the tolls increased $22,000. The work was received from the contractors down to the White river crossing at New- berry, 281 miles from the State line. One thousand two hundred men were at work during the season. The trus- tees ordered the part of the canal in Evansville to be made sixty feet wide in order to form a local harbor. The an- nual report shows $58,549 for repairs, and that $65,000 had been expended for bridges, of which there were 150 over the canal. ^'^ Many of these that had been built earlier 83 Governor Wrifrht, Message of ISr^O. in House .hninml. See mIso Dociimentani Journal. 1849, pt. TI. No. 11. 8^ DocKinoifdiji -Tonrnnh 1S.'>1. ])t. I, No. 7. SYSTEMATIC INTERNAL IMPROVEMENTS 389 were rotten and many complaints on this account found their way into court. Seven of these suits were carried into the State supreme court. The canal trustees were slow in adjusting damages, and an act of February 13, 1851, directed that injured parties should file their com- plaints with the canal board, and if no relief was secured in ninety days they should file suit in the circuit court.^^ A law similar to the one mentioned above gave authority to road supervisors to institute suit to compel the canal board to rebuild rotten bridges. ^^ The citizens of Williams- port tried by mandamus suit to force the board to build a lateral canal over to that town, and, failing in their suit, they dug one themselves and forcibly connected it with the main canal. This left the main canal almost dry for some time.^^ The water was let into the Maysville division in June, 1852. Laden boats then made the trip all the way from Toledo to Maysville, 392 miles. At a meeting held in May, 1852, it was agreed to lower all tolls and tariffs on the canal forty per cent. After this reduction the total receipts still rose to $193,400, a gain of $14,000. This was the high- water mark for toll on the Wabash and Erie. This is the more significant because it came before the whole canal was opened. The work was about done to Petersburg, and $262,281 had been expended on the Evansville division, showing that it, too, was well-nigh completed. There was transported on the canal this year 2,300,000 bushels of corn, 1,606,000 bushels of wheat, and 88,000 barrels of salt. The expenses of operation this year were $67,237."'^ Deducting this from the gross tolls, there remains $126,163 as the net returns of the canal at its best. This would pay five per cent on two and one-half millions. While this does not look very favorable to us, yet in the steadily increasing tolls one can see some grounds for the hope that with a 87 Laivs of Indiana, 1851. ■ ss Laws of Indiana, 1852. ^^Documentary JonrnaJ, 1S54. No. 21. ^^ Docuwentanj Jovrnnl, 1852. pt. II. No. 7. (26) 390 . HISTORY OF INDIANA terminal on the Ohio river tolls would increase enough so that the whole canal would become dividend-paying. While the outlook in this direction was encouraging to the canal builders, the outlook in other directions was ex- tremely gloomy. Complaints, honest and dishonest, ending in lawsuits, multiplied all along the canal. Floods tied up navigation for days, weeks, or even months. Fleets ot boats were grounded for weeks at a time in shallow water, or by breaks in the embankments, while their cargoes of farm products, sometimes live animals, depreciated or be- came utterly worthless. At best there was traffic during only eight months of the year. The Evansville and Terre Haute railroad was already under construction, and the Fort Wayne and Covington (Wabash Valley), and the Crawfordsville and Vincennes had been organized. These, it will be noticed, paralleled the canal throughout its length.'" The tolls for 1853 dropped to $181,207, due to poor crops. A great deal of trouble was had with the banks along the deep cut south of Petersburg. A flood in White river destroyed all the aqueducts from Point Commerce to Newberry and piled the drift high against the big aque- duct at that place. The citizens, thinking the extreme high water due to the big aqueduct, indicted the trustees for maintaining a nuisance ; but the legislature stopped the prosecution.'-'- All the locks, gates, dams, towpaths, and bridges were reported rotten and giving away. The Birch Creek Reservoir was built during this year. It covered about six square miles, and the inhabitants of the district regarded it as a fruitful source of malaria. The General Assembly had it investigated in 1854 and it was reported quite healthful.-' •"• A mob of armed men black- ened their faces and cut the dam at midday. May 10, 1855. This left the whole of the Eel River section dry. The loss on the dam was over $10,000. Governor Wright sent the militia from Evansville under General Dodds and Captain Denby to protect the work. They found everything quiet 'Ji Documenfanj Joiinuil, 1S52, pt. II, No. 7. 92 Laws of Indiana, 1S53, March 4. ^3 History of Clay County, Index. SYSTEMATIC INTERNAL IMPROVEMENTS 391 and spent the season hunting, fishing, and playing cards with the settlers. The next day after the soldiers left, the dam was again leveled. Many men were arrested, but were promptly released by the local magistrates.^^ This trouble never was settled, and this division of the canal was rendered useless by the lawlessness of the people of that neighborhood. The reservoirs were swamps full of the natural growi;h of the forest, and in summer became stag- nant frog ponds. By the year 1856 it was manifest to all that the canal was doomed. The tolls dropped to $113,000 and expenses for repairs rose to $106,000. The whole section from Terre Haute to Evansville was rendered useless on account of the destruction of the Birch Creek Reservoir. Again the board of trustees reduced the toll rates on the canal. This failed to hold the trade. All the lighter articles of com- merce were shipped by rail.""' Fortunately for the State, the scrip issued to finance the canal was about all redeemed. Over $1,200,000 had been issued and all was now in except $15,000. The State was thus free of all obligations to it.»6 The report of 1857 left no question of the future of the canal. The tolls were $60,000 for the whole line. There was no regular navigation, no through traffic, as had been hoped. South of Terre Haute the tolls were $8,000 and re- pair expenses $40,000. The repairs for the whole line amounted to $115,000. The St. Joseph river broke around the feeder dam and it required $7,500 to repair the breach."' A series of local floods in the Wabash Valley dur- ing the summer of 1858 did heavy damage. Wild Cat, Wea, Coal creek, Spring creek, and Otter creek overflowed and carried away their aqueducts. The Wabash broke over its banks in Terre Haute and destroyed forty-six rods of canal. The entire damage was $55,000. Navigation was suspended from June 10 to August 26. The annual expenses of the canal, $181,000, exceeded tolls and land sales combined by 94 Documentary Journal, 1855, pt. II. No. 3. 93 Documentary Journal, 18.56. pt. II, No. 6, Trustees' Report. 96 lUd., pt. I, No. 3. State Auditor's Report. ^'^Documentary Journal, 1857, pt. II, No. 4. 392 HISTORY OF INDIANA $60,000. The stockholders ordered the trustees to close any part of the canal not paying expenses. The part from Terre Haute to Evansville was at once closed.^'^ After the canal board, in January, 1859, ordered all officers to quit, only a few local engineers, at reduced salaries, remained in ser- vice. In this year, a bondholder, named Johji Ferguson, secured an injunction from Justice McLean preventing the use of any money, except tolls, for making repairs. The canal was then divided into three sections which were let to persons who would keep the canal in repair for its use.^^ The south section from Terre Haute to Evansville was not kept repaired at all. The Birch Creek Reservoir was cut for the last time. The first breach in the long fill across Daviess county was left unfixed. Navigation was finally abandoned south of Terre Haute in 1860, although a few miles in Vanderburgh county remained open a year longer. Two men. Miller and Hedges, undertook to keep the line open from the Eel river dam to Terre Haute and with the aid of a gift of $1,000 from the city succeeded for a short time. The part from Terre Haute to Toledo remained open during the year. The Wabash railroad began a rate war at this time and soon attracted all trade from the canal. The railroad did this by a free use of rebates. By 1870 little more than a succession of stagnant pools marked the site of the former canal. A law of February 14, 1873, permitted the county commissioners to keep local sections of the canal in repair, but only a few temporary repairs were made. The trustees formally surrendered their trust in 1874. They had paid $436,545 for repairs and had re- ceived $274,019 in tolls.i<>*> A decree was obtained in 1874 under which the canal was sold February 12, 1876. There was realized from this sale $96,260. All told, the bondholders received about forty per cent of the $800,000 which they had advanced for the completion of the canal. The bondholders were not entirely silenced by the joint 98 Documentary Journal, 1858, pt. 1. No. 3. ^^Documentary Journal, 18T}9. pt. I. No. 8. 100 Twenty-eighth Aunual Report, 1874, Docum,entnry Joi(rnoli!i. aurl was the organ of the Whigs. 5 Indiana Journal, Jan. 5, 183.3. 6 The three bills are worthy of attention as a reflection of the jiopular views on banking. The Committee Bill provided for the Bank of the State of Indiana, to be located at Indianapolis, with power vested in the first directors to establish five branches in whatever counties they thought best. The $1,600,000 capital was to be divided into shares of .$50 each, and one-half was to be furnished by the State, the other half by individuals. Seven directors for the yiarent bank were to be elected SECOND STATE BANK OF INDIANA 397 The general necessity of a bank was conceded. There was some objection to enacting a State monopoly, and the experience with the old Vincennes Bank made men hesi- tate to charter another State bank. But on the whole the people were strongly in favor of a State bank and were deeply disappointed at the failure of the Senate to enact a charter. The bank question contested with that of internal im- provements for the chief place in the campaign of 1833."^ The General Assembly that met in December, 1833, lost lit- tle time in getting together on a bank charter.*^ A bill was before the House for discussion on the 6th of Jan- uary. It passed the House by a majority of 48 to 23 ; and the Senate by 18 to 11. The provisions of this charter show that it was care- fully drawn.'' It has no trace of any interests contrary to the public welfare. The State was divided into ten districts as nearly equal as possible and the directors were to establish a branch in each district. The directors were given power to locate an eleventh and twelfth branch as ;muii;illy by the General Assembly, who were to choose six directors for each branch. The iudividual stockholders were to elect six directors for the parent bank and seven each for the branches. Non-residents were not to vote in stockholders' meetinjjs. P^ach director must own at least ten shares, and no one could sit as director in two branches. The stock was non-taxable; six per cent was made the legal rate of interest; the charter was to run twenty-seven years, and the State auditor and treasurer were to visit and inspect both bank and branches. The House Bill resembled the senate bill very much. The capital stock was the same, and the location and number of branches were to be the same; unpaid stock, however, was to be secured by a mortgage, and stock could not be given as security on a loan. Each branch was a separate corporation; specie payment was necessary, but the branches were not mutually resi^onsible. No municipal corporation could borrow over $5,000 and no State, or county, officer could be a director in the bank. The profits were to go to education. As passed by the House, this bill provided for thirteen directors, five chosen by the General Assembly, and eight by the stockholders; and the luinimum capital for each branch was to be $50,000, instead of $80,000. The Farrington or Senate Bill is printed in the Indiana Journal, Feb. 16, 1838; the House Bill in the issue of Feb. 2.3 ; and the Bwing or Committee Bill in the issue of March 9. "* Indiana Journal, May 4, 1833. 8 Indiana Journal, Jan. 1, 1834. s Laws of Indiana, 18.34. ch. vii. 398 HISTORY OF INDIANA soon as the commercial situation seemed to demand it. The head office was to be at Indianapolis, but there was no parent bank. The branches were on an equality, and the Indianapolis branch was not to enjoy any prestige nor exert any undue influence over the other branches. This charter forbade the bank's dealing at all in real estate. The provision worked to the advantage of the bank, for the people had more faith in a bank that did not deal in real estate. It was to be a strictly specie-paying institution, and if at any time it refused to redeem its notes in specie it was to forfeit its charter, a provision which was later disregarded in a critical period of its life. This provision in its charter put it in a class with the best banks in our history, and clearly set it off from the "wildcat" brood then springing up in all the surrounding States. The rate of discount was fixed at six per cent, and it was to issue no notes under five dollars; but this limita- tion was removed in 1841, after which the bank was al- lowed to issue notes as low as one dollar. The president was elected by the General Assembly for a term of five years at a salary of from $1,000 to $1,500. For the State Bank the General Assembly chose four directors, and each branch one. These constituted what was known as the bank board. This board had full power over the branches, and could make examination, personally, or require a re- port of any branch without a day's notice. The bank board in its turn made an annual report to the General Assembly, It appointed three directors yearly for each branch, and the stockholders chose from seven to ten more. The branch boards elected presidents and cashiers for the branches. None of the officers could hold State offices while on the bank boards; nor could any stock- holder give his stock as security for a loan; nor could a president, cashier, or director, endorse for anyone or for each other. The capital of the bank was placed at $1,600,000, later raised to $2,500,000 by an amendment adopted March 1, 1836, One-half of the entire capital stock was subscribed by the State. Each branch was to have an equal part of SECOND STATE BANK OF INDIANA 399 the capital, i. e., $160,000, at first, and after the amend- ment of 1836, $250,000. The policy in organizing was to distribute the stock as widely as possible, and for this purpose the State arranged to lend money on real estate mortgages to subscribers of bank stock. To carry out this provision of the charter and pay for its own subscriptions the State borrowed in the East $1,300,000. The charter was to run twenty-five years, expiring January 1, 1859. One cannot fail to note the great care displayed in the charter to make the bank safe, and its circulation sound. All the arts known to "swindling bankers" were guarded against.i" As indicated above, the notes were signed by the local cashier and the central president. There was mutual responsibility among the branches, but not a di- vision of profits, each branch retaining all it earned. The bank board might limit the loans of any branch to one and one-fourth times the paid in capital ; and might call for reports monthly or oftener, or take control, and close a branch permanently. It might take funds from one branch, when they were not being used, and transfer them to another in need of money. No branch might have more debts due it than twice its capital ; later this limit was raised to two and one-half times. A subscriber had to pay $18.75 in cash on each $50 share. The State furnished the balance, $31.25, and took freehold security, double the value of the loan. The loans to subscribers were to run from twenty to thirty years. All money earned by the State stock, above the five per cent interest on the bonds, was to go inta the hands of the commissioners of the sinking fund, by whom it was to be lent on freehold se- curity. § 73 Organization and Policy of the Bank It was impossible at this time to concentrate the trade of Indiana in one center as was done in Ohio at Cincinnati, in Kentucky at Louisville, and in New York at New York 10 The reference is to :i territorial law of 1815 in which private bank- ers are called "swindling bankers." 400 HISTORY OF INDIANA City.i^ The Whitewater Valley traded to Cincinnati. The trade of the southern part of the State flowed to the Ohio, but one could not say whether Madison, New Albany, or Evansville would secure the larger portion. New Orleans was the final market, and boatmen shipped indifferently from a dozen river-board ports — Vevay, Jeffersonville, Leavenworth, and Troy sharing the trade with their larger rivals.'- Back from the river small centers of popula- tion and business, and especially of politics, were growing up at Brookville, Lexington, Charlestown, Salem, Bedford, Bono, Paoli, and Princeton. Vincennes, Terre Haute, La- fayette, and Logansport were the Wabash towns. Craw- fordsville, the "town in the big flat woods," was the greatest land market in the United States. There was little com- merce at this time at Indianapolis, while Muncietown, An- dersontown, Delphi, Peru, and Wabash were blooming out from struggling villages into pretentious county seats. Seven out of ten towns chosen as locations of the branches of the bank were on the borders of the State; only six of the ten contained over two thousand people each. The population of the State was about 500,000. There were about 900 merchants resident in the State, and perhaps an equal number of nonresident traders operating on the Ohio and Wabash. On the Ohio river the busy pork-packing season was in November and December, i"- Drovers traveled through the neighboring counties and bought up large droves of hogs. These were butchered on the river-board as soon as cold weather set in. The products were shipped to New Orleans in the early winter before the ice blocked the Ohio. Thus there was a good demand for money in that section in the fall. The produce of the Wabash was gathered in flat-boats from the smaller streams. The boatmen had to wait for the thaw in the spring, when the ice was gone, and there was plenty of water. This required capital in February and March, and the produce was realized on by 1 1 Indiana Journal, Feb. 22, 1834. 1-' Lanier. Sketch of Life of J. F. D. Lanier, 17. 13 Indiana Journal, Feb. 22, 1834. SECOND STATE BANK OF INDIANA 401 To St. Joaeph St. JoMpli Eltbart Indiana in 1833. By E. V. Shockley. 402 HISTORY OF INDIANA June 1.^^ What little lake trade there was came in mid- summer. At this time the farmers of the interior were buying up hogs and cattle to fatten for the fall market. On January 30, the General Assembly chose Samuel Merrill, pension agent for the State, president of the bank for a term of five years. By May 10, all stock in the Indianapolis and Lawrenceburg branches was taken, and a meeting of directors was called for May 20, at which time all the branches had made returns showing full subscriptions. At a previous meeting of the bank board, February 13, the branches had been located. i' A loan of a half million dollars was effected by the loan agents of the State, the fund commissioners, August 6, and Governor Noble set November 19 as the day for the bank to open its doors for business. The total cost of organization had been $614.45, and this amount was more than offset by the premium received on the bonds issued. The bank was prosperous from the start. ^''' Men had subscribed for stock deliberately and there was little evi- dence of speculation. Taken as a whole its officers were beyond criticism. The Whig party controlled the State and kept Samuel Merrill at the head of the bank till 1843. Then his place was taken by a worthy successor, Judge James Morrison, who held office till the Whigs again gained control, ten years later, and placed Ebenezer Dumont in charge. These men, by the policy they established, placed the bank on a firm foundation in the confidence of the people.^" 14 Will. F. Hnnlin.ii, "The State Biink of Infli;iu;i.'' a thirty-six i)a£:e article in the Joiinidl of Political Econonni. Dec. 1S05. 15 Indiana Joiinml. Feb. 22. 1834. Also Journal of the Indiana Hlatc Senate, 1834. 59. Also Bank Rei)ort-<. I, \). 1. The aiiiuial repoi-ts were made by the cashier of the State Bank, to the legislature, and were due in November. J. M. Ray was cashier duriiiir the entire life of the bank. The branches were located as follows: The first at Indianapoli.s. second at Lawrenceburg, third at Richmond, fourth at Madison, tifth at New Albany, sixth at Evausville, seventh at Vincennes. eighth at Bedford, ninth at Terre Haute, tenth at Lafayette, eleventh at Fort Wayne, twelfth at South Bend, thirteenth at .Michigan City. i6Brt»A- Reports, II (1835). 1 ff. 1' Harding, The State Bank of Indiana, 12. SECOND STATE BANK OF INDIANA 403 § 74 The Panic of 1837 The bank passed through two severe trials. The first of these grew out of the internal improvement activity which began in 1836. While both the bank and the inter- nal improvements were closely allied ventures of the State, their affairs were kept separate as far as possible. The improvement officials kept their funds in the bank and fre- quently overdrew their accounts. When the State failed in its payments, in 1839, the bank was involved by one of these overdrafts to the amount of $650,000, which seriously crippled it. In 1836 the fund commissioners of the State had been authorized to sell bonds and procure for the bank $1,000,000 more of capital, but through dealings with a corrupt bankrupt concern in New York all was lost but $20,000. There was a great demand at the time for loans and, depending on the extra capital, the bank had dis- counted heavily. The failure to secure the extra capital, coupled with the failure of the State, came near breaking the bank, and caused several branches to stop discounting for the time and call in all their loans. The State came to its aid' in 1840 and issued bank scrip to the amount of $722,640, which it gave the bank to pay the overdraft. The second trial of the bank's strength came in the Panic of 1837. Its deposits had risen rapidly from the start. The United States deposit was $1,062,238 in 1835, and the next year it rose to $2,267,489. In 1837, however, the United States deposit dropped sharply to $576,277 and disappeared entirely by 1840. President Jackson's specie circular of July 6, 1836, also helped to weaken the bank at this period by forcing the government land offices to refuse all kinds of bank notes. Its "quick" liabilities No- vember 26, 1836, were: public deposits, $2,276,357; indi- vidual deposits, $431,703; notes in circulation, $1,927,050; capital stock, $1,585,481 ; assets, specie, not given but about $1,000,000; discounts, $3,176,613; currency, $1,204,737. It was well that the three years of experience had taught the people the value of the bank. The stages which reached Indianapolis on Thursday evening, May 20, 1837, from 404 HISTORY OF INDIANA Lawrenceburg and Madison, brought the news that all the eastern banks, including the old Bank of the United States, had suspended specie payment. The news was as sudden as it was unexpected. The situation was grave. If the bank suspended specie payment it would forfeit its char- ter. If it did not suspend, it would be broken and thus ruin the business of the State. The bank board was fortu- nately in session, and, in spite of the law, immediately or- dered all branches to stop paying specie.^"- The most dan- gerous creditor of the bank was the national government, which had $1,500,000 in specie on deposit. Mr. Lanier was posted off at once with $80,000 in gold to see what terms could be made with Secretary of the Treasury Woodbury. Lanier went by boat to Wheeling, thence by stage to Freder- ick, thence by the Baltimore & Ohio railroad to Washington. His mission was entirely successful. Of all the banks then possessing government deposits, the Indiana bank was the only one that offered, or paid any specie. The secretary allowed the deposit to remain till drawn in the regular course of business.!*^ It is also very creditable to the bank that its bills were regularly received by creditors of the nation. Nearly every bank in the west and southwest broke under this strain, and also many in the east. The Indiana bank, alone, west of the Alleghanies, did not fail. The Whigs attributed the general disaster to Jackson's war on the Bank of the United States, aided and aggravated by the Specie Circular.-" The citizens of Indianapolis helped the local situation by approving in a public meeting the action of the bank board. The merchants of Indianapolis showed their faith in the bank and its directors by giving notice promptly that they would receive State bank notes of all branches at par and by expressing in another resolution full confi- dence in the bank. In its turn the bank board issued an is//u//«wa Joiinial. May 20. 1837. 19 Lanier. Life of Lanier, 15. 20 Indiann Journal. May 6. 1S37. "Iiuliaii.i. iu 1837. li;^(l Ihe largest amount of circulation and of specie in proportion to its capital, of any state in the Union." Geurg:e Tucker. The Theory of Money and Bank.-i. etc. (Boston. 1839.) SECOND STATE BANK OF INDIANA 405 address to the people of the State calling attention to the fact that the bank must, in self defense, close its doors against specie payment. Agents were in the State from the east who would take away specie by the wagon load, by means of the bank's own currency. The bank had on deposit in eastern banks $1,000,000 in its own notes which could all be used to draw from the various branches the $1,000,000 in specie which was in their vaults. The branches would continue to receive paper currency at par and cancel all indebtedness. The people were warned not to sacrifice their money. The people preserved their confidence and the bank preserved their money. The suspension was not forced, but was the result of due deliberation. The bank reported, and actually had, plenty of specie, A committee of the General Assembly made a thorough investigation and approved its conduct. A meeting of bankers from all parts of the country was called for April, 1838. John Lanier was again called on to represent the Indiana bank. The bankers met in New York, and Lanier surprised the eastern members by mak- ing a proposal, in which Albert Gallatin concurred, in favor of immediate resumption of specie payment. He succeeded in his mission and set August 13, 1838, as the day on which the banks were to begin again the payment of specie. But the banks still feared the specie would all be gathered in the east, and on November 19, 1839, the State bank again closed its specie vaults, not to reopen them until or- dered to do so by the General Assembly, June 15, 1842. The bank never defaulted again. No other State in the Union passed through this period with its currency so little deranged. There was much criticism of the bank during this pe- riod of suspension. The bank notes were at a discount of about five per cent outside the State. This was an especial hardship on merchants. One of the most lucrative fields of the bank's activity was the purchase and sale of ex- change. Bills on New Orleans were bought from shippers in the fall and winter. When these were about to mature, Lanier would go to New Orleans and cash them, using (27) 406 HISTORY OF INDIANA the proceeds in buying exchange on New York and other eastern cities. These bills were sold to Indiana merchants buying in the east and thus the bank turned its money at least three times a year. The discount on these bills, due largely to depreciated currency, was from eight to fifteen per cent on each transaction. During the panic the bank made ten to fifteen per cent clear profits.^i It took advan- tage of its freedom from specie payment and expanded its note circulation from thirty to forty per cent. The report of November, 1840, shows that directors had borrowed from the bank $430,802; other stockholders, $907,797; thus a total of $1,338,599 of its outstanding debts was against its own stockholders. All other loans amounted to only $2,339,819.-- It was to this condition that President Merrill alluded when he said many officers of the bank sought the positions only to enable themselves to borrow money. If we add to this amount the $692,433 owed by the State and a suspended debt of over half a million, we realize what a burden the bank was carrying. It had in suit for collection at this time also about $200,- 000, most of which had to be collected from sureties. This, however, was the ebb in the bank's career. Re- cuperation was as rapid as demoralization had been. Its large suspended debt was nearly all collected, and from this point onward the prosperity of the bank was steady. The flood of gold in 1849-50 brought life to all avenues of busi- ness, and the "hard times" of 1837-43 were speedily for- gotten. Looking back over the whole history of the State Bank of Indiana, one is compelled to say that it was successful. Its success is the more striking because it stands against the sordid background of "wildcat" banking. Its career fell largely in that most unhappy period of our history called the Panic Era of 1837, and it surely had little in its favor as far as the era was concerned. It was, for- tunately, well on its feet when this panic prostrated busi- ness throughout the United States. Although it did not 21 Lanier, Life of Lanier, 17. 22 Documentary Journal, 1840, 94. SECOND STATE BANK OF INDIANA 407 earn large dividends during that period, it protected itself better and took better care of its customers than any other bank in the west and did equally as well as any bank in the nation. It had scarcely weathered the panic when it found itself a creditor of a failing State to the extent of over one-third of its capital stock. The sinister hand of party politics is seen here and there, though never deadly except in the Constitutional Convention of 1851 and in the Free Banking Law of 1852. One is tempted to reflect that Jef- fersonian politics and laissez-faire economics never won a more regrettable victory than when they overthrew the State Bank of Indiana.^s One of the arguments used by the advocates of the bank charter of 1834 was that the dividends of the bank would pay the ordinary expenses of the State. A comparison of the statistics will show that the dividends ran low during the decade from 1838 to 1848. During a part of this time it had to suspend specie payments and curtail discounts, especially on eastern bills, on which it made most money. The dividends from 1843-45 inclusive ran low, because over $700,000 of the bank's money was tied up in suspended debts. Again in 1852 the State's expenses ran high, on account of the State Constitutional Convention of 1850. It must also be kept in mind that during this latter period the bank was piling up in its vaults a surplus of over $1,000,000, besides carrying $300,000 of suspended debt. The dividends — after paying interest on the borrowed capi- tal at five per cent — amounted to about $2,000,000 for the twenty-one years. Add to this amount a surplus of $1,434,- 000, a suspended debt of $216,000, which was practically all collected, and banking property worth $100,000, and the total earnings of the bank for the twenty-one years were about three and three-fourths millions. The ordinary 23 See Charles A. Conant's A History of Modern Banks of Issue (4th Ed., N. Y., 1909), 386; A. M. Davis's Origin of the National Banking System (Senate Doc. No. 582, 61st Congress, 2nd Sess.). For a similar experience see Charles Hunter Gamett's State Banks of Issue (Uni- versity of Illinois, 1898). 408 HISTORY OF INDIANA expenses of the State for the same period were about $1,800,000, or just about one-half of the dividends. A criticism of the bank, frequently heard from the be- ginning and growing more frequent throughout the twenty years, was that it failed to supply an adequate currency for the growing commerce of the State. That this criticism was just, will be seen by comparing the capital stock, dis- counts, and circulation statistics with the number of polls, acres of land assessed, and the total valuation of State property. The wealth of the State mounted by regular steps, while the capital of the bank, its circulation, and its discounts never appreciably increased. In 1836 the circu- lation was $2,000,000, when the polls numbered 75,000, the acres taxed numbered 5,000,000, and the total property was valued at $67,000,000. In 1854 the circulation was only $3,500,000 when the polls were 160,000, the acres 20,000,- 000, and the taxables near $300,000,000. This comparison needs no further comment. The disparity worked a great hardship and injustice on the debtor class, and this class formed a large majority of the people. § 75 The Era of Free Banks While the commercial interests maintained a firm faith in the integrity of the State Bank, there gradually grew up a sentiment of opposition. The reasons for this sentiment were not clearly defined, yet the sentiment was strong enough to control the General Assembly, and espe- cially did it dominate the Constitutional Convention of 1850-51. When a proposition to extend the State Bank charter was before the Convention of 1850 only one of its original supporters, Othniel Clark, voted for it.^^ The "hard money" Democrats, who in 1834 had been only an insignificant minority, had increased in numbers ^2 De'bates of the Constitutional Convention of Indiana, 1850-51, 1995. These Debates are printed in two large volumes, paged consecutively. This work is referred to hereafter as Debates. The discussion here given is based entirely on the Debates. Where specific reference is not given, any fact may be found readily by use of the excellent index of that work. SECOND STATE BANK OF INDIANA 409 till they held the balance of power in 1850. These men, however, were not inflationists. The strong current of public opinion opposed to the State bank came from the in- flationists — the men who wanted more money in circulation. Their chief objections to the State Bank were: (1) It had failed to supply enough currency. (2) It had been partial in lending money to its stockholders, and it had also favored farmers and stock buyers as against mer- chants, (3) It had refused its assent to the location of new branches, when business clearly demanded them. (4) It had suspended specie payment twice, and had not re- sumed payment the last time till the State forced it. (5) It had used its power as a monopoly and had almost defied the State government. (6) As all sound banks must do, it had made enemies of the large numbers of those who wanted credit and could not give sufficient security. On the other hand the teachings of Jackson were against paper currency, State banks, and monopolies. Many Whigs were opposed to paper money and voted against the bank, and some Democrats, like Hendricks, favored it. The demand for more money is always popular and crept out in nearly every speech in favor of free banks. It is to be pointed out that the conditions of business, and the needs of the day, had more to do with forming the opinion of the convention than an intelligent, statesmanlike under- standing of banking. The thirty-sixth session of the General Assembly met December 1, 1851. The new constitution had been in op- eration one month when, on January 3, 1852, William Z. Stewart of Cass county moved that a select committee of one from each judicial district be appointed to report a free, or general, banking bill. On January 12, Chairman John W. Spencer of Ohio and Switzerland counties presented the report of the regular committee on banks. This was in response to a resolution of the House to inquire into the necessity of enacting a gen- eral banking law. A majority of the committee favored such an act, and recommended the following restrictions: 410 HISTORY OF INDIANA (1) All issues of currency were to be secured by an equal amount of United States, or State stocks, and all banks were required to keep on hand in specie twenty-five per cent of their note circulation. (2) Two-thirds of the se- curities might consist of stock, one-third of real estate mortgages. (3) A slight discrimination should be made in favor of Indiana bonds. (4) No bank should have less than $25,000 capital. The committee asked that this report be referred to the select committee on banking. ^^ February 9, 1852, Mr. Stewart of the select committee reported a bill for general banking.^^ It was similar to the New York banking law of 1838. The bill was put on its passage April 30, and failed by a vote of 25 for and 20 against — lacking one of a constitutional majority. It was revived by a motion to reconsider, and on May 18, was passed by a vote of 27 to 18.'*^ Party lines were not strictly drawn in passing the bill, but in general the Democrats favored and the Whigs opposed. Governor Wright ap- proved the bill, but was not enthusiastic in its support. The act was to take effect July 1, 1852. The general features of the law have been indicated. The State auditor was to be comptroller, issue all bills, and keep all plates. Notes were to run from one dollar up to five hundred in the ordinary denominations. Not over one- fourth of the whole amount was to be less than five dollar notes, and the banks were not to handle notes less than five dollars issued outside the State. Notes were to be regis- tered, counted, and countersigned by the auditor, who also stamped them "secured by the pledge of public stocks." Circulation was guaranteed by a deposit of United States, Indiana, or other State bonds equal to Indiana fives. The State was in nowise pledged to redeem the currency. Specie equal in amount to twelve per cent of the circulation had to be kept on hand by the banks, and specie payment must never be refused on penalty of having the bank closed at 'i^ House Journal, 1851, I, 425. 44 House Journal, 1851, I, 803. 45 Senate Journal, 1851, 1018. SECOND STATE BANK OF INDIANA 411 once. Reports were to be made semi-annually to the State auditor.^^ The plan looked plausible, and its authors were proud of the law. There may have been some who were inflii- enced by selfish motives, but the method of its passage can- not be criticized. By December 15, 1852, six months after the law went into force, fifteen banks had been organized, and are examples of the seventy-four that followed.^^ These had deposited $910,000 worth of stocks face value, and had received currency to the amount of $800,000. They were only an earnest of the deluge. Six of the banks were said to be doing a legitimate local business. Five had put their notes in circulation at New York. No notes had been issued to four of them at the date of the report, December 15, 1852.48 Either State Auditor Ellis felt that he had no au- thority under the law to restrain the establishment of banks, or else he had no inclination to do so. Governor Wright was inclined to think the latter was the case. In his message of January 7, 1853, the governor, for the first time, mentioned the subject of free banking.^^ Although he had signed the bill, he had not recommended it in any previous message. Like many others at that time, he rec- ognized the insufficiency of the circulating medium, and the inability or refusal of the State Bank to meet this need. The governor was, however, quick to see the failure of the new law. The restrictions were entirely inadequate. Al- ready five banks, of the "Owl Creek" kind, with only a nominal existence, and a capital of $365,000, had been or- ganized. These bankers, he thought, had no idea of re- deeming their notes. The pledge of the State would give their notes circulation, and an unnatural expansion of the currency must result. At one time it would rob the cred- itor, at another time, the debtor. Under the present sys- tem, he thought, there could never be a sound currency. The speculator came to Indianapolis with a bundle of bonds 46 Laws of Indiana, 1852. 47 Documentary Journal, 1853, 98. 48 Documentary Journal, 1853, 150. 49 Senate Journal, 1853. 412 HISTORY OF INDIANA under one arm and a roll of bank notes under the other. He deposited his bonds, that had cost him from fifteen to fifty cents on the dollar, and got for them Indiana cur- rency, dollar for dollar, recommended by the State. Pre- sumably he went to some obscure place and put them in circulation, but in reality he took them to New York. The Constitutional Convention and the General Assembly of 1851 had, in fact, invited the bondholders to bring their bonds to Indianapolis and cash them at par, and, perhaps, for a few years draw interest on both the bonds deposited and the currency received. The natural result followed hard on this unnatural ex- pansion of the currency. About May 1, 1854, a flurry in the money market started the trouble. The Crimean War in Europe changed the demand for American securities to a demand for American coin. Coin was at a premium, and brokers began to drain the Indiana banks to get coin for the eastern markets. Governor Wright had suspected the integrity of these banks from the first and, in 1854, had sent John S. Tarkington to a bank at Newport in Vermillion county to see if it would redeem its paper. As it was ex- pressed at the time, the bank "squatted." This test not only confirmed the governor in his suspicion, but started a run on the free banks of the State that never ceased. It was charged at the time that State Bank men furnished the governor with all the bills he wanted on the free banks.^*^ During this bank-run the State Bank paid out over $2,500,000 in specie without lowering its specie deposit. Business could not be carried on under such conditions. One instance must suffice as an example of the violent fluc- tuations of the period. The circulation of the free banks in May, 1854, was $9,000,000. By December 15, $3,454,279 of circulation had been withdrawn. People lost all confi- dence in free banks, but still the auditor felt that a few amendments to the law would make it a good banking system. 50 Berry R. Sulgrove, History of Indianapolis, 143. SECOND STATE BANK OF INDIANA 413 In the midst of this panic in the money market the Gen- eral Assembly met, January 4, 1855. Governor Wright again took up the cudgels for a sound currency.^^ He re- peated his statement of two years before that the free bank law was a failure, and that the past events had shown clearly that the restrictions provided in that law were en- tirely insufficient to prevent the abuses of the banking privileges. By January 25, 1855, there had been organized ninety-one free banks with a total nominal capital of $9,502,330 and an outstanding circulation at the time of $4,581,833, backed by deposited bonds, whose par value was $4,941,515. The money of the State was never so deranged as when the thirty-eighth session of the General Assembly met. As soon as H. E. Talbott became auditor, he stopped the issue of bills, but the cancellation went on and the con- sequent contraction of the circulating medium continued.^^ The legislature was deeply disappointed in the disas- trous failure of the law. Of course the system had in it all the weaknesses of banking systems not founded on liquid assets. But these weaknesses do not account for its quick and ruinous collapse. Had an efficient auditor administered the law and enforced it rigidly, such banks as that of New- port could not have been organized. The chief defect lay, not in the law, but in the officials who failed to enforce it. § 76 Bank of the State of Indiana — The Third State Bank, 1855-1865 The bill to charter a new State bank to be known as the Bank of the State of Indiana had a career in the Gen- eral Assembly very similar to that of the Free Bank Bill, though the opposition to it was more spirited and the lobby for it more powerful. It passed the senate, February 24, 1855, under the call of the previous question, by the close vote of 27 to 22.53 The minority joined in a bitter protest 51 Senate Journal, 1855, 17, the governor's message. Documentary Journal, 1855, 82. 52 Documentary Journal, 1855, 934. 53 Senate Journal, 1855, 551. 414 HISTORY OF INDIANA which they spread upon the journals. ^^ After passing the house, the bill met with the governor's veto. His principal objections were, that he had not had sufficient time to ex- amine the bill ; that the bank could issue unlimited paper ; that the measure, which might almost ruin the State, was not discussed in the legislature; that the bill exempted the bank from most of the burdens of taxation ; that the man- ner of subscribing its capital was unfair and invited cor- ruption; that it could discount paper equal to three times its capital stock, plus three times its deposits ; that its title, The Bank of the State of Indiana, was adopted to mislead people; that the State could have no control over it, under the charter, which was to run twenty years ; and that the whole atmosphere of this bill, from its introduction to its last vote, was charged with uncertainty and a suspicion of corruption and unfairness. The senate passed the bill over the veto by a vote of 30 to 20.^^ The above are the facts around which was woven one of the most noted legislative scandals of the State's history. 54 Senate Journal, 1855, 562. 55 The majority vote in the Senate on the four occasions is here given : 1. Passage of a Bill to Establish a Bank with Branches : — Alexander, Brown, Burke, Combs, Crane, Cravens, Crouse, Drew, Ensey, Freeland, Griggs, Harris, Helm, Jackson of Tipton, Meeker, Parker, Reynolds, Richardson of St. Joseph, Shields, Spann, Suit, Tarkington, Weston, Williams, Wilson, Witherow, Woods; — 27 in all. 2. Passage of Free Bank Bill : — Alexander, Anthony, Brookshire, Brown, Burke, Chapman, Combs, Crane, Cravens, Crouse, Drew, Ensey, Freeland, Glazebrook, Griggs, Harris, Hawthorn, Helm, Hendry, Hos- brook, Jackson of Madison, Jackson of Tipton. Knightley, Mansfield, Mathes, Meeker, Parker, Reynolds. Richardson of St. Joseph, Richard- son of Spencer, Robinson, Rugg, Sage, Shook, Spann, Suit, Tarkington, Vandeventer, Weston, Williams, Wilson, Witherow, Woods; — 43 in all. 3. Passage of the Free Bank Bill over the veto : — Alexander, An- thony, Brown, Burke, Chapman, Combs, Crane, Cravens, Crouse, Drew, Ensey, Freeland, Griggs, Harris, Hawthorn, Helm. Hendrick, Hosbrook, Jackson, Knightley, Meeker, Parker, Reynolds, Richardson of St. Joseph, Robinson, Rugg, Sage, Spann, Suit, Tarkington, Vandeventer, Weston, Williams, Wilson, Witherow, Woods; — 36 in all. 4. Passage over the veto of a Bill to Establish a Bank with Branch- es : — Alexander, Anthony, Brown. Burke, Combs, Cravens, Crane, Crouse, Drew, Ensey, Freeland, Griggs, Harris, Helm, Hostetler, Jackson of Tip- ton, Meeker, Parker, Reynolds, Richardson of St. Joseph, Robinson, Shields, Spann, Suit, Tarkington, Weston, Williams, Wilson, Witherow, Woods :— 30 in all. SECOND STATE BANK OF INDIANA 415 The smallest majority was that on the first passage of the bill to charter the Bank of the State of Indiana. All of the twenty-seven senators who supported this bill also supported the Free Bank Bill. It was an allied majority that ruled the Assembly. The vote is the more surprising because the bills provide for entirely distinct systems of banking. The Bank of the State of Indiana is, as the gov- ernor pointed out, a misnomer. It was not a State bank, but one of the worst forms of an unrestricted bank. The only guaranty of its integrity was its mutual liability and the character of its stockholders and officers. The bill, as it was introduced, provided for three grafts."*' The first consisted in selling the State Bank stock at a price to be named by the lobby and paid for with bonds bought at 90 and turned in at 100. This met with the most violent opposition and had to be dropped later. The second was in locating the branches, in which the new board of bank commissioners had full power. This board of commissioners, named in the second section of the bill, was composed of Thomas L. Smith of New Albany, Andrew L. Osborn of Laporte, Jehu T. Elliott of New- castle, Addison L. Roach of Rockville, and John D. Defrees of Indianapolis. It is but fair to state that Mr. Defrees took no part in the work after he ascertained the pur- pose of the lobbyists. It is not necessary to comment on the personnel of this board. All were prominent men and all had been highly honored by the people in an official way. There was no excuse for their conduct. They were to get their pay for lobbying by selling the locations of the branch banks. The commissioners were also empowered to ap- point two subcommissioners to open the books for each branch and receive subscriptions. The third opportunity for graft was in subscribing the stock of the bank. The law directed that the subcommis- 56 Bank Frauds, 41. This document of the legislative session of 1857 contains the evidence heard by, and the findings of, a joint committee appointed at the suggestion of Governor Wright to investigate the char- tering of the Bank of the State of Indiana. The report contains the tes- timony of most of the lobbyists and of members of the session of 1855. It has a good index. 416 HISTORY OF INDIANA sioners should open the books to receive subscriptions between nine and twelve o'clock. The commissioners were careful to appoint subcommissioners who would allow no one to subscribe except those recommended by the lobbyists. The charter was worth $500,000, at a fair estimate, basing the estimate on the dividend paying power of the old bank. Several lawsuits followed the organization of the bank, but the real merits of the case, with the State as a party, were never brought before the supreme court. Nor would it, presumably, have availed anything. Courts naturally hesitate to question the integrity of a coordinate branch of the government. No further changes in the bank laws were made till the law of 1874 was enacted, under which the State banks of today operate. The national law of 1863 as amended in 1866 stopped all State banks from issuing currency, and effectually put an end to experiments in banking, though it has not solved the greater question of the inflation and contraction of the currency. The new Bank of the State of Indiana gathered itself together after the storm and began to do a careful, con- servative banking business. The people soon came to look upon the whole winter campaign as a war among highway- men, in which, for the moment, the lobbyists had got the upper hand of the old bank men. Hugh McCulloch of Fort Wayne was elected president, and James M. Ray, cashier. Branches were established at Lima, Laporte, Plymouth, South Bend, Fort Wayne, La- fayette, Logansport, Indianapolis, Richmond, Connersville, Rushville, Madison, Jeffersonville, New Albany, Bedford, Vincennes, Terre Haute, Muncie, and Lawrenceburg. The bank opened with $197,903 paid-in capital, and $35,497 in specie, an average for each branch of $10,000 capital, and less than $2,000 in specie. It was on a level with the worst "wildcat" banks in all its essential features save two. Its branches were mutually responsible, and it was in the hands of the most capable business men in Indiana. Its president was one of the three or four greatest American financiers. The bank prospered until overwhelmed by the national bank SECOND STATE BANK OF INDIANA 417 system. Under an act of the General Assembly of 1865, it closed up its business. Nearly all the branches became national banks. Its last report, for the year 1864, shows how the national currency was affecting its circulation. At the close of 1862, it had $5,000,000 in circulation, and at the close of 1864 only $1,500,000. CHAPTER XVIII the pioneers and their social life § 77 The People The present population of Indiana, like that of all other American States, is a compound of the civilized nations of earth. The predominating strain in this population is the English, Scotch and Irish peasantry. Along the eastern foothills of the Appalachians these immigrants from Great Britain mingled and fused into a class with pretty well defined characteristics. They were of the substantial stock of English yeomanry, the stubborn, independent stock that has made the English soldier and the English colonist successful in all parts of the world. The second generation of these folk occupied the high valleys of the mountains from Carlisle and Pittsburg to the Watauga and Holston. Wherever they settled they built States and established institutions. The third generation, generally speaking, pushed on across the mountains, es- tablishing boroughs or forts at Limestone, Louisville, Bryants, Crab Orchard, Boonesborough and Harrodsburg, many of them pressing on to Vincennes and Kaskaskia. In numerous instances brothers and sisters parted in the eastern valleys, and their children met as cousins in Ken- tucky, one branch of the family having come by Tennessee and the Wilderness Road, the other by Pittsburg and the Ohio river. The fourth generation, about a century after their ancestors came from abroad, crossed the Ohio river into Indiana and Illinois, or crossed the Mississippi river 4i:':o Missouri and Arkansas. The language of this group of pioneers was the lan- guage of the eighteenth century commoner of England. By PIONEERS AND THEIR SOCIAL LIFE 419 calling it a Hoosier dialect, we would claim among the earli- est Hoosiers, Pope, who made "join" rhyme with "divine," and Bums, who invariably, in the full tide of his songs, "draps" the final "g" in all present active participles. But how, it may be asked, did it happen that a people would get a century behind in their language? A group of people in the heart of a wilderness continent late in the nineteenth century speaking the language of the early eighteenth century peasants sounds like an anachronism. The explanation is at hand. When this people settled in the back country of America they tore themselves away from the culture of England, they separated themselves from the ordinary channels of commercial life, and virtually went into exile. The long, century struggle with the wil- derness and its inhabitants engrossed their whole attention and energy. When they could snatch a moment's rest from the battle they did pitch their tents and endeavor to repro- duce English institutions, but the lure of the wilderness was too strong. The thirst for education was continually upon them. Witness the founding of Washington College at Salem, Tennessee; Transylvania in Kentucky, Vincennes in In- diana, to name only a few. During this whole century this energetic folk, impressionable, wide-awake, free, in a strange country, retained its language almost entirely by memory. The usual library among the pioneers was the Bible, the King James translation. It was a homogeneous group of people. Their preach- ers, their lawyers, their orators, all those who are sup- posed to influence language, were part and kindred of all the rest. There were very few newspapers and they had a very limited circulation. It is worth noting, however, that there is little trace of dialect in any newspaper. Whether this is due to the typesetters, who used a book, or whether it is a. case of a written and spoken language existing side by side does not appear conclusively at pres- ent. However, there is abundant evidence that the latter explanation is the proper one. There is no doubt that such 420 HISTORY OF INDIANA eloquent pioneers as Clay, Cass, Lincoln, Cartwright, and Asbury spoke the picturesque native language of their fore- fathers. The term Hoosier dialect is a misnomer. So far as it can be said to have any justification, it is in connection with the southern element of our population. Whatever pecu- liarity there may be in it is common to one-third of the na- tion, and a characteristic so common cannot be said to be very singular. ^ The social customs of early Indiana are most clearly un- derstood in the light of their history. Scarcely a feature of their early life but expressed itself earlier in Kentucky, Tennessee, Virginia or the Carolinas, and many customs and conventions were brought from over seas. The charivari, the Christmas shooting, the maltreating of the schoolmaster, the drinking and gambling, the tavern, the shooting match, the election day, the wedding and in- fare, the log-rolling, the quilting, the camp-meeting, all smack of the "old South" and "merrie Englande." The open-handed hospitality, which regarded it almost an insult for a man to offer to pay for meals or lodging, the quick sense of honor, which resented more keenly a reflec- tion on one's integrity than a physical assault, the con- tempt for business shrewdness or close bargaining, the quick temper, the explosive humor, the wide humanity, the philosophic as opposed to the scientific mind, the deep thought in the homely expression — these are some of the mental characteristics of this people. Thorough-going democracy, freedom from all restraint, elbow room, believers in Christianity though careless of creeds and forms, simplicity in dress and houses, careless- ness of accumulated wealth, life above property, neglectful- ness of business, enjoyment of plain society and discussion, rarely calling into action their great reserve power, on easy terms with the world, believing that the consequences of 1 Lois Kimball Matthews, The Expansion of New England, 197; Meredith Nicholson, The Boosters, ch. I. The text is based on a wide study of early Indiana newspapers. PIONEERS AND THEIR SOCIAL LIFE 421 one's deeds return to the doer — these are some of the lead- ing principles of their philosophy of life. They believed and practiced a community of work, but there was an individual score kept. The man who did not help his neighbor roll logs received no help in return, unless on account of charity. No people were ever more chari- table. They borrowed and loaned with the greatest free- dom everything from a team and wagon down to a set of pewter spoons. Yet there was little partnership in the own- ership of property. Each family lived to itself and had no great desire to have near neighbors.^ § 78 Home Life and Customs The pioneer located his home with little regard to any- thing but a supply of good water. Southern Indiana was well supplied with springs, and each pioneer home was near one. The style of the house depended on two factors — the time of the settler's arrival and the character of the man. Usually the settler came on ahead of his family, planted his crop and then proceeded to build a good cabin. If he preferred hunting to work, or took the ague, or if his family came with him, he usually lived a year or two in a half-faced camp. The half-faced camp was a log pen with three sides and a covering of brush. Sometimes a large log or a shel- tering rock served for a back wall. The front, usually fac- ing the south, was closed by a curtain or hung with skins. In front of this open side the fire was built and the cook- ing done. The ground was covered with skins and furs. Such a house did very well in dry, warm weather when no real shelter was needed. It was considered a makeshift by the pioneers and only occasionally resorted to. 2 The best discussions of this subject are in the writings of Edward Eggleston, Meredith Nicholson, and James Whitcomb Riley. From the historical standpoint F. J. Turner. Rise of the New West, is the best discussion available. A book just from the press, In My Youth (author unknown), gives a good sympathetic picture of Quaker life in early In- diana. (28) 422 HISTORY OF INDIANA The simpler form of the log house was a four-sided pen made of rather small, round logs, which were notched into each other at the corners so that each log touched the one below. It is said the settlers from the east built their log houses square, while those from the south built theirs about twice as long as wide. The houses were covered with clap- boards about four feet long, held on by weight poles. A hole for a door was made by cutting out parts of about four logs. A wooden board or a skin closed the opening. At the end stood a mud and stick chimney, the framework made of sticks and then covered over with clay. The best form of the log house consisted of two pens made of hewed logs. The pens were separated by an entry about twelve feet wide, which served as a porch. A frame window and two stone chimneys with four fireplaces, two downstairs and two up, often added an air of luxury to the double log house. The floors were made of heavy punch- eons split from ash, walnut or poplar logs, pinned to the sleepers and dressed smooth with an adz. The taverns were generally of this style. In one corner, on a framework of poles, was the shuck or feather bed, soon replaced by a more comfortable feather bed, pieced quilts and the famous Carolina coverlets now highly prized as relics. In the opposite corner of the room was the table with its quaint tableware, part pewter, part gourd, part wooden, and all remarkable for their scarcity. A huge fireplace six to ten feet wide monopolized the op- posite end of the house, decorated with a semi-circle of three-legged stools. A trundle bed for the babies was hid away during the daytime under the big bed. The boys scampered up a pole ladder to sleep in the attic. Any num- ber of visitors could be accommodated by spreading the feather bed on the floor. Tradition leaves no doubt that this log cabin hospitality was genuine. There were not many cook stoves in pioneer Indiana. A few might have been found as early as 1820, after which they appeared in increasing numbers. Perhaps one family in five had a stove by 1840. The immigrant who trudged PIONEERS AND THEIR SOCIAL LIFE 423 west on foot or came on horseback even was fortunate if he got through with a skillet and a pot. A spider skillet with lid and an earthen pot were more than the average cooking utensils possessed by a family. The meat was usu- ally cooked on a spit. Combread was baked in a small oven which, in reality, was a large skillet, if the family was for- tunate enough to possess one. If not, then Johnnycakes were baked on a board. If there was no board, the handle was taken out of the hoe and the metal covered with com dough and cooked. This was the famous hoecake. Practi- cally all bread was made of meal. All cooking was done over coals drawn out to the front of the fireplace. Some- times a crane was fixed in the side of the fireplace so that it could be swung on and off the fire at the convenience of the cook. As stated above, cornbread cooked in one of a dozen different ways was the staple food. Next came hominy and then some kind of meat. In the early days the most com- mon was venison and bear. Turkey and squirrel were not uncommon. In a few years chickens and hogs became plen- tiful ; later vegetables and fruit appeared on the table, the latter dried for winter use. The cooking was necessarily poor, and doubtless accounts for much of the sickness of that early period. The very first pioneers depended almost entirely on skins and furs for their clothing. The hunting-shirt, trousers, and moccasins were made of deer skins. A well- made suit with fringed coat, laced leggings and coonskin cap appeared well and was fairly comfortable in the warm, dry weather. When wet, it drew up to about one-half its usual dimensions, becoming cold and clammy. Soon linsey cloth took the place of skins, which, while more comfort- able, did not stand the rough wear like buckskin. All hailed with delight the time when they could lay aside both skins and linsey for the home-made woolen garments. A bear- skin overcoat, a beaver hat, a pair of buckskin gloves lined with squirrel fur, was considered good taste down till the Civil War. 424 HISTORY OF INDIANA Women wore plain dresses with an extra jacket in cold weather. The petticoat was usually of homespun. Woolen shawls were worn instead of coats. Hooks and eyes were used instead of buttons. On their heads they wore a sun- bonnet in summer, a knitted hood in winter. Shoe-packs were worn in winter and all went barefoot, men, women and children, in summer. Handkerchiefs and gloves were home- made, the former of cotton, the latter of squirrel skins. The children did not wear enough clothes in summer to warrant a description, the maximum being a long shirt hanging straight from the shoulders to the knees. In win- ter they dressed like their parents, the clothes being made on the same pattern and only slightly smaller. The pioneer boy in his everyday dress was a wonderfully skillful ma- chine, but the same boy dressed for a camp meeting, with starched shirt and brogan shoes, was the most woe-be-gone creature imaginable. About 1820 imported goods began to appear, such as broadcloths, brocades, taffetas and peau de soies. Beauti- ful furs, beaver hats, flounced skirts, balloon-shaped hoops, hats with a garden of flowers, cut-away coats with double- breasted checkered vests, silk stocks over hard buckram collars — such wore the gentlemen and ladies of the old school from 1830 to 1860. § 79 Occupation The pioneers as a rule came to their western homes empty-handed. While raising their first crops they lived on game. Many of them made their first payments for their land with money obtained from pelts and venison hams. In their hunting they depended entirely on their dogs and flintlock rifles. The woods were full of game. Deer, bears, turkeys, pigeons, and wild ducks were plenti- ful. The deer were found in large numbers around the salt licks. Droves of them ventured into the wheatfields or cornfields. Wolves were a pest that preyed on sheep and hogs. Swarms of wild bees were numerous in the woods. They PIONEERS AND THEIR SOCIAL LIFE 425 made their homes in hollow trees or clefts of the rocks. By watching the loaded bee, usually sprinkled with flour so that he might be seen as he made a "beeline" for home, the pioneer located the bee tree. He could either cut the tree at once or mark it. All pioneers respected a bee-hunter's mark. The tree was usually cut in September, if only the honey was wanted. It was cut earlier if it was desired to save the bees. The more serious work of the pioneer consisted in pre- paring his little home. He prospered just in proportion to the time he devoted to his farm. He found his land cov- ered with a heavy growth of oak, poplar, walnut, beech, gum, ash, maple, hickory and various other kinds of hard- wood timber. It was necessary to kill the trees so that sunshine might get through to the growing crop. The clearing might be made either by cutting and burning all the trees or by "deadening" the heavy timber. In either case the under- brush had to be cut, piled in heaps, and burned. Then the large trees were felled with an ax and cut into suitable lengths for rolling. The cuts were about twelve to twenty feet long. In some cases the logs were "niggered," that is, a smaller dry log was laid across the larger one and a fire kindled where they were in contact. In time the log was burned in two. The chopping in the clearing went on in- cessantly during the winter. In the spring, about the last of April, the settler was ready for the rolling. The "log-rolling" was almost an institution in Indiana for fifty years. All the men in the neighborhood, probably from twenty to fifty, gathered early in the day with axes and hand-spikes and piled the heavy logs in large heaps, three to ten logs in a heap, ready for burning. The men worked in "squads" of from ten to twenty each. There was both individual and team rivalry. Young bucks "pulled each other down" at the hand-spikes, while the squads worked to see who could work over the most ground or build the most heaps. After the logs were piled the young men spent a social (i> 426 HISTORY OF INDIANA hour or two jumping or wrestling. While the men were rolling logs their wives and grown daughters were busy at the house, "quilting." The housewife usually had two or three quilts "pieced" for the occasion. One of these at a time was stretched in the quilting frames by which it was supported high enough to be convenient to the women sit- ting. The best quilters gathered around the four sides of the quilt while the others helped in preparing dinner and supper. The meals were a feature of the event. Every- thing good was prepared and all the tableware of the com- munity was borrowed for the table service. After the sup- per was over, a short time might be spent in dancing, but this was not common at log-rollings, both on account of the hard day's work and the necessity of changing clothes after handling the dirty logs. The number of log rollings in a community varied from twenty to forty. May was a hard month for the pioneer.^ If the settler had time, the easiest way to clear his land was to "deaden" the trees in July or August, let them stand two years before clearing. Many of them would then burn up as they stood. Such "deadenings" were to be seen on almost every farm. Many of the best cuts of oak, poplar, walnut and ash logs were left at the rolling to be split into rails for the fence. The "new ground," however, was usually fenced during the fall or winter. The plowing was done with a jumping shovel, of which the stock was wood and the point iron. An upright cutter stood just ahead of the point to jump it over roots. This was a modest implement and plowed where it could and jumped out where it couldn't. It had a reputation for kick- ing. When the point struck a root or rock the handles were thrown back violently, striking the unwary plowman just below the belt. The harrow was made entirely of wood. 3 Those who are fond of telling of the good old days may try this program : Rise at 3 a. m.. "chunk up" ten acres of log-heaps before 6 a. m., breakfast, walk three to ten miles, roll logs till 6 p. m., walk home, "chunk up" ten acres of log-heaps before going to bed. Repeat it thirty days in succession, rain or shine. PIONEERS AND THEIR SOCIAL LIFE 427 If no harrow was handy, a "drag" made of brush did quite as well. The harness, single- and double-trees were the flimsiest. "Truck" wagons with solid wooden wheels were common. Oxen were used about as much as horses. Pitch- forks and spades were made of seasoned wood. The culti- vation was anything but satisfactory and the crops meager. Grain, except corn, was sown broadcast and "brushed in" with a light "drag." Corn responded best to this rough agriculture and creditable crops were raised. The early pioneers of the upper Mississippi Valley lived on corn. Roasting ears lasted from the first of August to the last of September. By that time the early corn was ready for the "gritter." By November, the first grists were ready for grinding. Cornbread and hominy were staples from then till spring, when garden vegetables took the place of the hominy. From corn was made the ever- present whiskey, without which nothing of consequence could be done. After the log-rolling season work on the farms was without excitement until the harvest season. Beginning with wheat, which ripened about June 20, the harvest sea- son lasted until the hay was in the mow, about August 1. Again there was a community of work. The harvesters gathered in groups of ten to twenty. The cradlers vied with each other in laying a straight, even swath and in not leaving a stalk of wheat standing. Then there was racing across the fields by the cradlers. When the field was done the "stubble call" was given. The housewife, assisted by the neighbor women, prepared bounteous dinners and sup- pers for the reapers. Lunch, consisting of pie and coffee, was served at 10 a. m. and 4 p. m. The hay harvest fol- lowed hard after the wheat, when the cradlers took up the scythes and the binders the pitchforks. The wheat and hay were put into stacks and then the harvest season was over. Sometimes a big harvest home barbecue or picnic followed. A period of inactivity followed harvest, during which the farmer watched his corn crop ripen, hunted squirrels, fished, built a house or barn, broke ground for wheat or 428 HISTORY OF INDIANA attended shooting matches or camp meetings. It was dur- ing this period, also, that sickness prevailed, especially fevers and chills. With the appearance of frost, the corn gathering time was on. Much of the corn was cut in fodder, and after the fodder was cured the corn was shucked off. The remainder was gathered off the stalk, the ears being snapped off and hauled to the barn. During the long winter nights the neighbors again gathered together, this time for a husking bee or "corn shucking." The above was the usual program of the year's work. Produce for down river trade was gathered in the fall and loaded on boats in March or April, the boatmen returning by June. One cannot help but notice the mutual helpfulness of the pioneers of each neigh- borhood. § 80 The First Public Utilities Each farm was largely self-sustaining. Each neigh- borhood had a small store where powder, lead, salt, iron, leather, whiskey and a few other commodities were bar- tered for beeswax, tallow, ginseng, furs, deerskins and other marketable produce. At the county seat stores, one could buy calicoes, silks, cambrics, blue cloth for men's suits, collars, stocks, coffee, tea, sugar and plug tobacco. The latter articles were costly. Money was very scarce and little of it passed over the counter. Trading horses was almost a passion with the pioneers. Two horsemen rarely met without a banter for a trade. Saturday afternoons at the taverns or towns were devoted to horsetrading, or "horse-swapping," as it was called. The most inconvenient work of the pioneer was getting his corn and wheat ground into meal and flour. Horse mills were the earliest. Such a mill consisted of a pair of burrs made of hard stone so set that one stone revolved on the other, their rough surfaces almost touching. The grind- ing was slow and the meal poor. Next came the water mills. These were often built by settlers from the east. An undershot waterwheel usually furnished motor power. They did better and quicker work than the horse mills, but PIONEERS AND THEIR SOCIAL LIFE 429 it was often forty miles to the nearest one, and then one had frequently to wait two days to get his "turn." In later years the miller kept a large stock of flour or meal on hand, and could trade with the farmer at once. The most common evidence of pioneer life existing today in Indiana is these old mills with their races and dams. Travel through the country was tedious. The roads were mere bridle paths. The coach roads were continuous mud holes. In course of time the mud was replaced with poles to make the corduroy ; the poles with boards to make the plank roads; the boards with stone to make the pike. Neither has proved satisfactory. Along the larger roads certain houses with accommoda- tions for travelers came to be known as taverns. Such were usually the double log houses. The law compelled the tavern keeper to have at least one extra bed and an extra horse stall. The county board fixed prices for meals, lodging, drinks and horse feed. Each tavern paid a license fee. All classes of travelers ate and slept together, the sleeping usu- ally being done on the floor. What was lacking in style, however, was usually made up in geniality. One could ap- preciate the latter when he "alighted" at a tavern after a hard day's ride in the rain or snow and mud. The traveler was welcomed into the "big house" and given a seat before the roaring fire. A boy removed his muddy boots and leg- gings, giving the guest a light pair of slippers in return. Dry clothing was furnished, after which there were a steaming supper and a warm feather bed. Next morning his boots, dry and greased, his leggings and greatcoat, all dry and warm, were brought, he stepped dryshod from the door of the hostelry in the saddle stirrup and pursued his journey, thankful for the good night's rest and enter- tainment. § 81 Festivals and Festivities The chief fixed holidays of the pioneers were New Year, Fourth of July and Christmas. These days were, in gen- eral, set aside for the little folks. In the larger towns on 430 HISTORY OF INDIANA the Fourth there was usually some formal banquet with endless toasts by the dullest of orators. On New Year's day there was frequently a neighborhood hunt, ending with something to drink. Little work was done, but no great amount of celebrating was ever indulged in. Christmas was the supreme holiday of the children. In a humbler way it was much as it is now. Apples, sweet-cake, home- made candy, such simple toys as could easily be contrived, together with warm gloves or stockings, knit by the mother, were the common gifts. The poor were remembered with substantial gifts of things to eat and wear. The young folks often arranged for a sleighride if there was snow. Except among the Quakers, Santa Claus was a universal visitor Christmas eve. The Christmas dinner was the prin- cipal attraction for the married folks. The greatest sports for the men were the shooting matches, which were in order from September 1 till Christ- mas. The long squirrel rifle, with flint lock and "set trig- gers," was a favorite with every pioneer and shared with the dog the pioneer's affections. Resting on a pair of deer antlers, it held the place of honor over the cabin door. Up to a distance of 100 yards it was fairly reliable, up to fifty it was accurate. The shooting match, like the old English contests with the bow and arrow, was primarily a trial of skill. Little value was placed on the quarters of beeves or venison won, as compared with the glory of winning. An elaborate sys- tem of rules and regulations governed it, but the essentials were as follows : A level stretch of ground 100 yards long, a large tree to receive the balls as they passed through the boards, charred so that the balls would make a neat round hole. Those who fired "offhand" stood eighty yards away, those with a "rest" one hundred yards. Old marksmen fired "offhand." There were two ways of determining the result. In one case the nearest shot took first choice, the next took second, and so on. In the other the added dis- tance of three shots was taken. Under some rules all three shots had to be within a certain distance, say two inches, of the center or the man lost. PIONEERS AND THEIR SOCIAL LIFE 431 A form of amusement that came from the South, but which was soon abandoned in Indiana on account of its rudeness, was "goose pulling." A goose was hung head downward from the limb of a tree about ten feet high. The goose's neck was coated with grease. The participants rode under at a gallop and endeavored to pull the fowl's head off. Some one stood by with a whip to see that the horse passed at the proper gait. Dancing was generally indulged in before the religious revivals of the late twenties and early thirties. The folks usually gathered at some house that had an especially smooth puncheon floor and danced the night away. The sleepy old fiddler's arm was made of iron and he could reel off "The Arkansas Traveler," "Old Dan Tucker," or "Cot- ton Eye Jo," for hour after hour. The dancing consisted of the square dance, three figures to the set, with a Virginia Reel, a "jig" or a "hoe down" when some ecstatic couple wished to show their artistic execution of the "side step," "back step," "single or double shuffle," "heel and toe" or other fancy foot maneuvers. This harmless amusement may still be seen in many parts of Indiana. In many places it disappeared long ago before the relentless crusade of the Protestant churches, largely because rowdies made the dance the scene of drunken brawls. Those who had moral objections to dancing substituted social games which in nature much resembled the dancing. "Keeping Post Office," "Picking Cherries," "Weevilly Wheat," "London Town," "Dusty Miller," "Needle's Eye," were the names of some of the commoner of these. The players sang the refrains, accompanying them by rhythmic performances almost like those of the dance. Many of the games had forfeit features in which kisses were the inva- riable penalties. The intermissions at spelling schools, singing schools, and debates were occupied by these games. Weddings were the occasions for a two days' festival, the night intervening being devoted to dancing. The wed- ding was performed at the home of the bride. A formal invitation was sometimes written by the schoolmaster and 432 HISTORY OF INDIANA carried around by the groomsman, but the usual way was just to "send word." The guests were supposed to arrive about 11 a. m. The groom, accompanied by five or six of his best friends, left his father's home on horseback in time to reach his destination about 11 :30 a. m. As soon as the ceremony was performed, the married couple sat down at the head of the table, around which all the guests gathered. Of all the neighborhood feasts this was the most sumptu- ous. Everything available in the way of rations and table service in the whole community was brought into service. After a night of dancing interspersed with all kinds of jests and pranks, including a charivari, at the expense of the married pair, the whole company repaired to the home of the groom's father, where another dinner, the "infare," was served. In the afternoon the newly married couple were escorted to their new home, if one were ready. If there was no house ready the couple lived with the old folks until a house was built, when the young people gathered together for the last ceremony of the wedding, that of in- ducting the couple into their new home. This, and the dancing which accompanied it, were called the "house warm- ing."4 § 82 Sickness and Physicians Contrary to most statements in novels, the health of the pioneers was bad. Poisonous vapors hung over the swamps and drowned woodlands. The sun was unable to penetrate the deep foliage and dispel the miasma. The river bottoms and flat lands were notoriously subject to malaria. No one thought of the housefly or mosquito being disease disseminators. There was no science of medicine, only a practice. We know now that most of their diagnoses were wrong, hence it is difficult to say what diseases were most 4 Besides tbe above there were muster day, election day. and the camp meeting which have been described elsewhere. Discussions of early customs in Indiana are too numerous to mention. The following, however, are excellent: Baynard Hall, The New Purchase; D. D. Banta, MaTcing a Neighhothood; Young, History of Wayne County; William F. Vogel, "Home Life in Early Indiana" in Indiana Magazine of His- tory, X; the various county histories. PIONEERS AND THEIR SOCIAL LIFE 433 destructive. There can, however, be no question of the terrible ravages of smallpox, typhoid and malarial fevers, pneumonia, tuberculosis and bronchitis. Among the chil- dren two diseases were especially prevalent at this time — croup and cholera infantum. The fact that at least half of the babies died before they reached the age of four will help one understand the terror caused by these ailments, croup in winter and cholera infantum in summer. Here is a recipe for cholera infantum copied from the Medical Investigator, published by Horace N. T. Benedict, a botanic physician of Springfield, Lawrence county, Indi- ana, in 1847 : "Take a double handful of dewberry roots, double handful of the roots of cranebill, two gallons of witch hazel leaves. Boil these separately until the strength is all extracted. Strain and pour the liquid into one vessel and boil down to a quart. Add a pint of good French brandy and a pound of loaf sugar." Or, take the following recipe for "yaller janders" (yel- low jaundice) : "A double handful of the bark of wild cherry root, an equal amount of bark from the root of the yellow poplar, a like quantity of sarsaparilla, same of red sumach roots, and half that amount of bitter root. Boil them in two gallons of water until it is reduced to one-half gallon. Strain and let it simmer down to one pint. Mix this with a gallon of hard cider, shake it well and add two ounces of madder. Take a half teacupful three times per day." These and others at hand illustrate the practice of the herb doctors or "botanic physicians," as they called themselves. They have only recently disappeared. The concoctions were intentionally made as bitter and nauseous as possible. In most cases the medicine was called "bitters." There were a few physicians in the State who had been trained in the east, but the greater number were strictly home-grown. As a result, this period was the heydey of the quack, who either came from the east or operated from some eastern city. The treatment of the best physicians of that time seems rather bloodthirsty to us. Taken as a class. 434 HISTORY OF INDIANA however, they were honest, trying to the best of their abil- ity to serve their fellow sufferers. The herb doctors, or the "Botanic School," led a spirited fight against the other school of practitioners, whom they called the "calomel doctors." The calomel doctors won out in the long struggle, and the reputation for quackery has fastened itself on the "yarb" doctor just as it has on the "wildcat" bank and the "Deestrick skule." The "Thompsonians" were a school of physicians who took a somewhat middle ground between the "calomel" and the "botanic" schools. They relied very largely on vapor treatment. Diseases should be sweated out of the system was their theory. A special chair was manufactured known as the "vapor bath chair" and sold widely through- out the State. Whatever the disease might be, the patient was clapped into the "vapor chair" and steamed as nearly to death as was thought safe. This treatment was supple- mented usually by liberal doses of "white walnut" pills. The vapor treatment was perhaps the least harmful of all the panaceas then in vogue. The people were an easy prey to all kinds of knavery; sure cures for cancer, consumption and other prevalent dis- eases, especially "milk sickness," made their regular ap- pearance. An example, taken from an advertisement in a leading paper, will suffice : Fontain & Son, chemists of the Royal University of Paris, after long experiment, had at last found a certain cure for the dread disease, consump- tion. They named their discovery the "Restoration Fran- caise." The son, Louis, at once came to America and opened an office at Washington, D. C. By way of adver- tisement he offered through all the churches of Indiana to give an eight-franc bottle to any poor person who would leave his name and address with the preacher. Lobelia was a standard nostrum with the "botanies," so much so that they were frequently called in derision the "lobelia doctors." The standard lobelia prescription was as follows: "Fill a jar with the green herb, lobelia, well bruised and pressed, and for every quart the jar will con- PIONEERS AND THEIR SOCIAL LIFE 435 tain add four or five pods of red pepper. Then pour on enough good whisky to cover the herb and let stand. The longer it stands the better." This was called a sovereign remedy for phthisic, croup, whooping cough, colds and catarrh. The doctor quoted, says he had administered it with excellent effects to infants not a day old and to the aged long past three score and ten. Another kindly doctor adds that no careful man will be without a jar of good lo- belia in the house, which, together with a judicious use of warming teas, "such as pennyroyal, catnip, balm, sage, etc., will save many dollars in doctors' fees, as well as many children's lives." The foregoing are sufficient to show the struggle that was going on in our State during this period. We are at first disposed, as Eggleston unfortunately did in another field, to hold the whole society up to ridicule. Nothing would be more unfair or dishonorable. These men were as a rule as honest as physicians are today. The superior skill of our physicians now is due in no small degree to the patient work of the pioneers.^ § 83 State Charities Organized charity or philanthropy was unknown among the earliest settlers. If a man's house burned or he met disaster in any way, his immediate neighbors helped him to the best of their ability. Neighborly kindness was more in evidence then than now. Neighbors sat up with and nursed the sick and buried the dead. There were no pro- fessional nurses nor undertakers. The deaf and dumb, the blind, the lame, the insane, and the feeble minded were a burden to themselves and their friends. The township trustee gave out a little aid reluctantly to some of the un- fortunates. Just preceding the Civil War the counties be- gan to establish poor asylums where the worthy poor were given a home, but this has proven anything but satisfac- tory. 5 Dr. G. W. H. Kemper, A Medical History of Indiana. 436 HISTORY OF INDIANA The hard times following the panic of 1837 caused a great amount of suffering. As early as 1839 the attention of the General Assembly was called to the miserable con- dition of the insane, then kept as criminals in the county jails. The State was not in a financial condition to under- take any systematic relief. The most that could be done was to awaken the public conscience. Expert physicians from the east lectured at different points in the State, and especially before the General Assembly, on the treatment and care of the insane. Governor James Whitcomb, a New Englander by birth and a graduate of the State University, took a deep interest in such matters. Among other things he collected reports from the county sheriffs on the num- bers and condition of the insane in 1842. The General As- sembly of that year authorized the governor to gather data from other States on the manner in which they cared for their insane. As a result of this the General Assembly in 1844 levied a small tax for the purpose and the next year a commission drew up plans and arranged for the purchase of the farm of Nathaniel Bolton, on Mount Jackson, imme- diately west of Indianapolis. In 1847 the central building was erected on this site at a cost of $75,000. Since then the State has cared in an adequate manner for such un- fortunates. In 1843 William Willard, a mute from the east, visited Indiana and estalished a school for his fellow defectives. The work was looked upon with favor, and in 1844 the State opened a school with Mr. Willard in charge. Such men as Henry Ward Beecher and Bishop Matthew Simpson took an active interest in the work. A site for a school, 130 acres, just east of Indianapolis, was purchased in 1846, where, by 1850, a spacious building was erected. The school has been entirely successful and still flourishes. The founder of the blind asylum of Indiana was William H. Churchman, himself blind. He was bom in Baltimore and educated in Pennsylvania. He began teaching in 1839. James M. Ray, of Indianapolis, visited his school in Louis- ville and at once became interested in the work. A small PIONEERS AND THEIR SOCIAL LIFE 437 appropriation in 1845-6 enabled Mr. Ray and Mr. Church- man to visit different parts of the State and awaken an interest in the condition of the blind. The ministers, as usual, assisted in the charitable work, Mr. Beecher taking the lead. The friends of the unfortunate blind were at first reluctant to let them go from their immediate care. Finally, Mr. Churchman and his friends found twenty blind persons who would attend, and twenty-eight more who were eligible and friendly to the undertaking. With these the asylum was opened in Indianapolis in 1847. The school grew slowly but surely and during the next ten years earned for itself a place in the public confidence.^ 6 George "W. Cottman in Indiana Magazine of History, March, 1914. Goodrich and Tuttle, History of Indiana, ch. 34. The newspapers of the decade from 1840 to 1S50 contain the popular discussions of this question. The public interest which from 1827 to 1840 had been ab- sorbed in internal improvements was turned to schools and benevolent institutions. (29) CHAPTER XIX the mexican war § 84 Texas and Oregon Questions As early as 1820 young men of Indiana became inter- ested in Texas. The extraordinary offers of land by Moses Austin and others who had received large land grants from the young Mexican Republic attracted these adventurers. Visiting New Orleans in the flatboat trade, they heard with astonishment the stories of border life. The decade from 1840 to 1850 in Indiana offered little inducement to the ad- venture-loving sons of the old Indian fighters. The Texas country, covered with herds of buffalo, and almost sur- rounded by warlike Indians and Mexicans, and inhabited by such renowned heroes as Bowie, Houston, Crockett, and Travis, had for them a resistless fascination. After a month's trip on a flatboat, finding themselves at New Or- leans in the opening of the spring, with more money in their pockets than they had ever had before, with romantic Texas, easily reached on the one hand, and far-away, pro- saic Indiana, reached by a tedious upstream trip in a row- boat, or a walk of 1,500 miles, on the other hand, it is not hard to understand how many of the young flatboatmen in the early days drifted into Texas. Many of them, after a stay of a few years, returned to tell the folks at home of the wonderful country. Their let- ters, as well as the accounts of the heroic war of liberation in Texas, and the fight of the warriors at the Alamo, were printed in the Indiana "papers and eagerly read. Keeping these conditions in mind, one can appreciate the dismay with which the Whigs learned that the Demo- THE MEXICAN WAR 439 cratic National Convention in 1844 had discarded Van Bu- ren, who opposed the annexation of Texas, and had nomi- nated Polk, who favored it.^ "What a result!" said one of the leading Whigs when he heard what the convention had done. "It has nominated a man of no distinction, a South- erner, a slaveholder, an anti-tariff man, a sub-treasuryite, and a Texas annexationist." ^ His attitude on Texas, together with the fact that Polk favored the annexation of Oregon, whither many Indian- ians had gone in the last ten years, insured his carrying Indiana.^ Could the voters of Indiana be expected to sup- port a man who would disown and cast off hundreds of their friends and relatives who had gone to Texas and Oregon? Not even the great personal popularity of Clay could induce them to do it. § 85 Indiana Militia in 1846 In territorial times, and for many years after Indiana became a State, the militia were kept in good condition. Every man took his place in the organization. The leading men of the State were proud to be colonels and generals of militia. On training day the companies vied with each other in the expertness of their drill, in the attractiveness of their uniforms, and the condition of their arms. As the terrors of the War of 1812 were forgotten, and the Indians, year by year, disappeared from the State, the interest in military affairs decreased. In the Black Hawk War, 1832, the State was able to call out some fairly good companies of soldiers. But as there proved no need for them, no permanent interest was aroused. In fact, Major Beckes' company bcame mutinous and Colonel Russell's battalion was made so much sport of by the newspapers that the militia lost rather than gained prestige. By 1840 the "cornstalk" militia had become a joke.^ The law, never- 1 Indiana Journal, June 29, and July 6. 1844. 2 Indiana Journal, June 8, 1844. 3 Indiana Journal, Nov. 23, 1839. 4 Laws of Indiana, 1843, cb. VII. The militia law of 1831. This latter was printed separately and is very rare. 440 . HISTORY OF INDIANA theless, remained on the statute books. '^ The militia offi- cers had become purelj^ nominal, without duties. Neither did the State have any arsenal nor munitions of war of any kind. At the beginning of the year 1846 the State had a few hundred old muskets, yagers, pistols, carbines, and per- haps 500 Hall's Rifles. Even these were scattered over the State, stored away in barns and other similar places. The State also possessed one six-pound cannon. The law per- mitted organized companies to draw these old arms and use them for training purposes. Many of them were very properly thrown away by the militiamen as soon as they were received.^ An adjutant-general was still among the State officers and drew a salary of $100 per year. David Reynolds, who held the position of adjutant-gen- eral when the Mexican War began, was a man of energy and judgment, though entirely ignorant of all military af- fairs. His tireless activity made up in a large measure for this deficiency of military knowledge and the lack of prep- aration by the State. The General Assembly of 1847 re- warded his efforts by raising his salary to $250. The last report of the State militia to the ordnance of- fice of the United States had been made in 1832. There were in 1846 a few companies of organized militia, but the State had no record of them. There were, it seems, two colonels, but not a general of either brigade or division, the only officers whose duty it was to report to the State Adju- tant-General.'^ Since 1836 there had been a constantly growing inter- est among Indianians for Texas affairs. It was heightened by the Texas Declaration of Independence, the recognition 5 They were called the "Cornstalk" militia because they frequently used cornstalks instead of guns on training day and because the only distinctive part of their uniforms were the corntassels in their caps. 6 Report of the Quartermaster, Samuel Beck, Nov. 30, 1845. Docu- mentary Journal, 1845-6, pt. II, 45. 7 The adjutant general reported that while it was true the system had undergone a general paralysis the martial spirit of the people was not extinguished. A number of energetic independent companies and a few regiments of district militia had survived the general disorganization. Report of Adjutant General Reynolds, Nov. 29, 1845. Documentary Journal, 1845-46, pt. II, 37. THE MEXICAN WAR 441 by President Jackson, March 3, 1837,^ by the various pro- posals for annexation, by the annexation itself in 1845, and by the dispatch of General Zachary Taylor with an army of occupation to the disputed country.^ As he crept slowly toward the Rio Grande with his army the conviction deep- ened that war would result. Finally, May 13, 1846, came the declaration of war,io the news reaching Indianapolis May 21, in time for the papers of May 23. ^^ § 86 Organizing the Indiana Brigade May 16, three days after the declaration, the United States secretary of war, by letter, required of the governor of Indiana three regiments of Volunteers. The governor received the requisition during the evening of May 21 and issued his proclamation the next day.^- Along with the proclamation was sent a memorandum of the directions of Congress, enacted May 13, for arming and equipping the militia. Each regiment was to consist of a colonel, lieutenant- colonel, a major, and an adjutant who was also a lieutenant of one of the companies. These were called the field offi- cers. There were, besides, a sergeant-major, quartermas- ter-sergeant, and two musicians. Each regiment was com- posed of ten companies, each containing one captain, one first lieutenant, one second lieutenant, four sergeants, four corporals, two musicians, and eighty privates. A full regi- ment thus consisted of 937 men, or a total of 2,811 men to be raised in the State. The governor designated Camp Clark, just east of New Albany, as the meeting place or rendezvous of the little 8 Messages and Papers of the President, III, 281. 9 Lew Wallace, An AutoMography, I, 102 seg. "I wanted the war, thinking of little else, and I went about hunting news and debating the probabilities. I haunted the Journal office. My pockets were full • of newspapers, especially those of New Orleans and New York." 10 Laws of United States, 1846, ch. XVI. 11 Indiana Democrat, May 23, 1846. See also Governor's Proclama- tion, May 22, 1846. 12 Documentary Journal, 1846, pt. II, 8. 442 HISTORY OF INDIANA army. The proclamation gave any citizen of the State the privilege of organizing a company. A wave of military enthusiasm passed over the State with the news of war. Mass meetings were held in the larger towns, where popular speakers inflamed the younger men with stories of the heroism of war. The declaration of war was read and approved almost everywhere. At Indianapolis it was solemnly resolved, on motion of the cir- cuit judge, "that the war ought to be carried into the enemy's country and the Star Spangled Banner planted in the city of Mexico on the halls of the Montezumas.''^^ Lew Wallace, then a young man of nineteen years, opened a recruiting office at Indianapolis, enrolled a com- pany, and had it organized in three days. The nearest rail- road, in fact, the only railroad in the State, ran from Edinburg to Madison. Patriotic farmers hauled the volun- teers in their wagons to Edinburg, whence they proceeded by rail, or, more properly, by tramway, to Madison and thence down to Camp Clark by boat.^^ The response was similar from all parts of the State. Captains William Ford and Thomas L. Sullivan had two companies ready in a short time at Madison. Capt. William Walker of Evansville at once tendered the services of the "Indiana Riflemen," a volunteer company of which he was captain. Two companies came from Fort Wayne by way of the Ohio canals and the Ohio river. Capt. Spier S. Tip- ton's company from Logansport passed Indianapolis June 12; Capt. H. S. Lane's company from Crawfordsville reached Indianapolis June 13, on its way to New Albany. By June 10, the State requisition was filled and the thirty companies accepted; by June 20, all had arrived at New Albany and were ready to embark for New Orleans. At Camp Clark the volunteers began to experience some of the realities of war. The weather was hot and the camp equipment poor. There was a great deal of politics and consequently a great deal of dissatisfaction in the election of officers. The governor and lieutenant governor were on 13 Lew Wallace, An AutoMographp, I, 115. 14 Madison Banner, May 27, 30, 1&46. THE MEXICAN WAR 443 the grounds, and the Whigs charged that they were there to see that their political favorites were properly cared for.^^ The State treasury had been empty for eight years pre- vious to the outbreak of the war. At no time in its history have the State's finances been in a worse condition than in 1846. The governor at once appealed to the branches of the State bank. Most of the branches responded at once. Madison, Indianapolis, Lawrenceburg, New Albany, Evans- ville, Fort Wayne and Lafayette placed from $5,000 to $10,000 each at the governor's disposal. The South Bend, Michigan City, Vincennes and Terre Haute branches were either unable or unwilling to aid. With the assistance of these loans the State was able to place its quota in the field in nineteen days. Besides the thirty companies received, twenty others had applied to the governor for service before June 17. ^'^ The volunteers spent about two weeks at Camp Clark.^'^ They were mustered into the United States service June 19. IS General John E. Wool, Governor Whitcomb and Lieu- tenant Governor Paris Dunning reviewed the troops on the 20th. Tents were drawn, one for each six men, rations distributed, and the Indiana Brigade went into regular camp. At first there was some objection to drinking the warm river water, but no serious sickness resulted. On July 3, Col. James P. Drake announced that the First Regiment would embark on the 5th. After firing a few rounds with cannon, the soldiers settled down to hard work on the Fourth of July and by sunrise of the 5th they 15 Lew Wallace, An AutoMography, I, 116. It was also charged that the president handed out commissions in the army in i-eturn for votes against the Wilmot Proviso. Indiana Journal, April 2. 1847. The In- diana Journal, June 7, 1847, said the election of Colonel William A. Bowles for the responsible position of colonel was directly due to the intrigues of Governor Whitcomb. The Wabash Express referred to Dunning as the "big dog" around the encampment. State Journal, July 15. For a commentary on the miserable, petty, polities employed in organizing the troops, see Dunning's letter in his own defense, Jour- nal, Nov. 20, 1846. See also Thomas O'Neal's letter in the Journal, Dec. 15, 1846. 16 Indiana Sentinel, June 17, 1846. 17 This was frequently called Camp Whitcomb. 18 Indiana Sentinel, June 27, 1846. 444 HISTORY OF INDIANA were marching aboard the steamboats "Grace Darling" and "Cincinnati." The First Regiment reached New Orleans July 11. The six days' journey down the river had given the troops an impression that war was about the most pleasant occupa- tion possible. They received their first shock, however, when they went into camp in the thin mud on the river bank below New Orleans. Their visions of glory began to fade. Several men had died on the trip down. A consid- erable number were sick. There was no dry ground on which to stretch their tents. Having no straw nor brush, they spread their new blankets on the wet ground. Soon the muddy slime had worked its way through the thin blan- kets. The camp took on the appearance of a hog-wallow. The weather was hot, but the air was too moist to dry the muddy blankets. Four days were spent by the Hoosier volunteers on the glorious slime-covered battlefield of New Orleans, before ships could be secured to carry them across the gulf. They then embarked on two small vessels.^'' On the gulf other new experiences awaited the volunteers. They had cleaned up their blankets and new regimentals as soon as the gulf breeze had dried the mud into harmless sand. But seasick- ness struck them with worse damage to their new clothes than had been done by the New Orleans mud. A volunteer from Hendricks county died and was buried at sea. The melancholy sight made a deep impression on the men. One of the transport ships was out eleven days on the trip, hav- ing been driven out by a storm; others crossed in three days.-^ 19 The soldiers commented on the enormous size of these ships; one, the "Flavio," was of 640 tons burden, the other of 350 tons. 20 The following from a letter printed in the BrookviUe American, Aug. 21, 1846: "Imagine two hundred men stowed away in a small brig with a four and one-half foot hold. All of her crew with two hundred volunteers to sleep in that hold ; warm nights and sometimes a heavy sea ; the hatches all down, without a window or an air hole; to live on coffee, slop fed food, meat and dry crackers; half the men seasick and spewing all about you ; sometimes you would find yourself eating and some one close by THE MEXICAN WAR 445 § 87 Campaigning in Mexico The Indiana Brigade landed at Brazos, thirty miles from Matamoras. They were disappointed at finding noth- ing but a barren, sandy coast where they had ex- pected a large city. A hunter's hut was the only sign of human habitation. Two ships were wrecked on the sandy coast, but no lives were lost. Measles and dysentery, due to bad drinking water, broke out in the camp at the mouth of the Rio Grande. Colonel Drake reported that one hun- dred of his command were sick, August S.^i Thirteen had died by September 1. The First Regiment was left indefinitely to guard imag- inary supplies at this camp at the mouth of the Rio Grande. The other two regiments camped sixteen miles farther up the river. Colonel Drake visited General Taylor and asked permis- sion to remove the First Regiment from the unhealthful camp, but the request was refused. Here, then, they re- mained until December 10, when all three Indiana regi- ments started up the river to join the main army. After a short march the First Regiment, to its great disgust, was again ordered back to the mouth of the Rio Grande. The Second and Third Regiments continued their march, reach- ing Monterey shortly after Christmas, and Saltillo January 1, 1847. General Taylor had gradually crowded the Mexicans south past Monterey to Saltillo. The Mexicans under Santa Anna gathered head again at San Luis Potosi, 200 miles to the south. At this time General Scott took active com- mand of the troops of the United States, and ordered Tay- lor to send him most of his seasoned soldiers to aid in a march on Mexico from Vera Cruz. The departure of the regular troops compelled Taylor to gather his little remaining army closer together. The Indiana regiments were ordered up to join the other troops would let slip right on your dinner and your clothes; and then you will imagine how pleasant our trip was from New Orleans to this place." 21 Indiana Democrat, Aug. 11, 1846. 446 HISTORY OF INDIANA at the front at Saltillo. A scouting party of eighty Ken- tucky cavalry was surrounded and, on the night of January 21, captured at El Salado, ninety miles south of Saltillo.-^ A captain escaped and returned with the news that Santa Anna with an overwhelming army was rapidly advancing on Saltillo. Taylor at once decided to take a position in a mountain pass five miles south of Buena Vista, through which the road to San Luis Potosi passed. Here on the afternoon of February 22, the little Ameri- can army of 5,000 men was confronted by Santa Anna with an army of 20,000 men. General Wool arranged the line of battle. The seasoned troops were stationed in the pass, expecting a direct frontal attack, while the Illinois, Indiana and Kentucky volunteers were stationed far out on the left flank to prevent the Mexicans coming around that wing, the Second Indiana occupying the extreme left. The Americans took up their position about the middle of the afternoon of February 22, 1847. A short time be- fore this, clouds of dust had been seen rising in the south. An hour later the advance guard of the Mexican army ap- peared before the fortifications on the main road and de- manded that the Americans surrender. After a show of fight there, a brigade of Mexican light troops marched up the ravine and attacked the Indiana and Illinois volunteers. The fighting continued till dark at that point without ad- vantage. The tired troops slept, or tried to sleep, where they had fought. Some of them have related how they sat up and watched the fitful flashes of the senti- nels' guns as they kept up a spattering fire through the night. One of them was reminded of the fireflies hovering over the meadows at home on a summer night.23 At daybreak the soldiers were ordered into line just as a Mexican band began to play their national air. A battery of five eight-pounders had taken position on the left of the Indianians, and, as they were moving forward to support this, two Mexican divisions, 7,000 strong, ^2 Indiana Sentinel, March 17. 1847. 23 James A. Cravens. Lew Wallace. An Autobiography, I, 169. THE MEXICAN WAR 447 marched out to the ravine in their front and formed in battle line 100 yards away. The Indiana regiment, only 360 strong, was under the immediate command of its old colonel. Gen. Joseph Lane. As the Mexicans defiled from the ravine the Indianians dropped to their knees and the strange battle began, the Indianians outnumbered eighteen to one. A battery of five guns supported the Hoosiers. While the battle was going on. General Lane sought to make the American fire more effective by moving his men up closer. Just at this time a second column of Mexicans appeared on the left. Seeing these, or thinking the battle lost, and that it was best to save what men he could, Colonel Bowles, who was at the opposite end of the line from Gen- eral Lane, gave the order to retreat. Thus, while the left of the line started forward in obedience to General Lane's order, the right started to face back at the command of its colonel. The retreat soon became a run. Twenty of the men never stopped till they reached the buildings of the ranch at Buena Vista. General Lane, Lieutenant Colonel W. R. Haddon, and Colonel Bowles succeeded in reforming 190 of them, who, along with the Third Indiana and a Mississippi regiment under Col. Jefferson Davis, returned to the field in time to join in the final attack on the charging Mexi- cans. Under their own officer, Lieutenant Colonel Haddon, and formed on their own colors, they helped as bravely as any other troops to restore the lost battle. These details have been given in order to show exactly what part the Second Indiana took in this battle. General Taylor, in his official report, said: "The Second Indiana, which had fallen back, could not be rallied and took no fur- ther part in the action, except a handful of men, who, under its gallant Colonel Bowles, joined the Mississippi regiment and did good service." In another place General Taylor in his report said : "Arkansas, Kentucky, Illinois, Mississippi, Texas, and some Indiana men had fought hard all this dreadful day." As evidence of this latter his own official report shows that the Second Regiment lost 107 of its 360 448 HISTORY OF INDIANA men; 90 of these fell in the morning, while opposing more than 7,000 Mexicans on the open field. The time during which they stood under fire is shown by the fact that they fired twenty rounds each. Santa Anna in his official re- port said his men were on the point of retreating when the American line broke. Had not the stupid blunder been made by the officers of the Second Regiment, the Mexicans might have been routed and the glory of the battle instead of its disgrace would have belonged to the Indianians. The fault lies deeper. The officers of the volunteers were all petty politicians. Indiana had competent men, trained for war, but through pohtical juggling not one of them was called into service. Of the three colonels and one brigadier general, not one could have led a company through the manual of arms. Two of them later learned the manual at least, but Colonel Bowles, of the unfortunate Second, did not. His election to the colonelcy was very questionable, and he had never pretended to drill his regi- ment. Gen. Joseph Lane and Col. James H. Lane quar- reled incessantly, and a duel between them was pending at the time of the Battle of Buena Vista. The First Regiment was left at the mouth of the Rio Grande and forbidden even to move its camp out of the swamp. Seventy of its mem- bers were buried there, where the wind and tide soon re- moved the shallow covering of sand and left their bodies to the birds and wild animals. From this same Camp Belknap 259 men were sent home sick. Many of them died on the way. All three of the regiments felt, with what seems at this date and distance good reason, that they had been intentionally neglected by the commander-in- chief. As an explanation, it may be that General Taylor did not care to risk his fortunes in the hands of officers selected as he and General Wool knew the Indiana officers had been. At any rate, the regiments that went away to war carrying flags made and presented by patriotic women, feasted and toasted at every opportunity, hauled in wagons by admiring farmers and finally praised by every expectant politician, returned a sickly, sorry, quarrelsome wreck with THE MEXICAN WAR 449 doubtful reputation for soldierly discipline and bravery. The fault, however, was not with the men.-* The war was not over. April 24 Governor Whitcomb received a requisition for a fourth regiment. This was or- ganized at Camp Clark June 16, under Col. Willis A. Gor- man, and dispatched from New Albany June 27. They were ordered to Brazos to join General Taylor. September 3 they were at the mouth of the Rio Grande on their way to Vera Cruz; September 16 they arrived at Vera Cruz. August 31 a requisition for a fifth regiment was re- ceived. This was organized at Madison and mustered into service October 22, under James H. Lane, formerly colonel of the Third. It embarked for Vera Cruz October 31.25 jt reached that place November 24, after experiencing a se- vere squall on the gulf. By the last of July, 1848, these troops had all returned, having acquitted themselves nobly in the march on Mexico. Gen. Joseph Lane won especial honors in this campaign. A season of barbecues followed, the battle flags were presented to the State amid solemn ceremonials, and the chapter was closed. The State had furnished promptly a small army of five thousand men, who had marched and fought creditably. 24 For the facts in this tangled chapter of our history, see Lew Wal- lace, An AntoMography, I, 163, 193. The New Albany Democrat, Aug. 24, 1848; this latter paper contains the correspondence between General Taylor and John Defrees and George G. Dunn; Indiana in the Mexican War, passim; Official reports are to be found in the Documents of the Mexican War; Documentary Journal of Indiana, reports of the Adjutant General; manuscript correspondence of George G. Dunn contains many letters bearing on this question. A detailed report by Lieutenant Col- onel W. R. Haddon is in the Western Sun, Aug., 1848. As soon as Tay- lor was nominated for the Presidency Indiana politicians began to criticise him for his report on the Second regiment. A court martial exonerated the soldiers from cowardice and shifted the blame to Bowles and Lane, but the quarrel continued. The net result of this and the Dunning affair was to leave a cloud on the reputation of the State and its soldiers. The fault was in the petty politics that put Bowles and Lane in such responsible positions and in 1848 used the record for par- tisan purposes. 25 Documentary Journal, 1S47-8, 290-91. CHAPTER XX the constitutional convention of 1850 § 88 Early Agitation for Revision By the terms of the Constitution of 1816 it was pro- vided that every twelve years a referendum vote should be taken on the advisability or necessity of calling a constitu- tional convention. It was the generally accepted theory then, as laid down in the writings of Jefferson, that one generation had no moral or legal right to bind by constitu- tional limitation a succeeding generation. It is hardly prob- able that the framers of the constitution intended by this provision to prevent the citizens of Indiana from calling a constitutional convention at any time they chose. It is more probable that it was intended by this referendum to insure each generation two chances of holding a conven- tion in spite of an opposing General Assembly. It must be kept in mind that the immediate followers of Jefferson looked with favor upon the constitutional convention as one of the most effective institutions of popular democracy. ^ There appears to have been very little demand for a new convention for a long time after 1816. As one of the op- ponents of calling a convention said in 1847, "The people of Indiana are attached to their constitution. It is the work of their forefathers. Under it for thirty years they have enjoyed a degree of prosperity unsurpassed by any State in the Union. "- The cause for calling a constitutional convention among 1 Prof. C. B. Coleman in Indiana Magazine of History, VII, 41 ; Jacob Piatt Dunn, lUd., VII, 100. 2 George W. Julian, in Indiana House of Representatives, Tri-weelcly State Journal, Jan. 15, 1847. CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION OF 1850 451 English speaking people is always found to be insistent and acting through considerable periods of time. The American people generally have not lightly called into activity such revolutionary bodies. There has always been some deep- seated dissatisfaction. There were several minor defects in the working of the State and local governments under the first constitution, but the chief ground of complaint was the working of the General Assembly. The State had been led by this body into a gigantic system of internal im- provements in which it had lost more than twelve million dollars. It became deeply involved in debt. Its bonds were hawked about the eastern markets as low as seventeen cents on the dollar. A gang of hungry office-holders had been and still were robbing it; and the General Assembly seemed unable or unwilling to shake them off. The annual meetings of the Assembly seemed to be an unnecessary ex- pense and the annual elections kept the people in a political turmoil. Moreover, the General Assembly was neglecting the affairs of the State and giving its time and attention to hundreds of petty private affairs. A reading of the titles of the special laws of any session will give one an idea of the petty jobbery that was carried on by means of special laws. With all this dissatisfaction the demand for a conven- tion, if we are to take the votes on the subject as evidence, was not strong. There is scarcely any mention of the vote on the subject up till 1846. A referendum had, however, been taken in 1823, only seven years after the constitution went into effect. ^ The vote was decisive against calling a convention. In 1828, four years later, the regular twelve year referendum was taken with a similar result.'^ During the following twelve years there was little agitation on the subject. The General Assembly of 1845, however, took up the subject. There was a spirited demand by a few ener- getic members for a convention. They succeeded in pass- 3 Laws of Indiana, 1822, 121. Each voter was directed by this law to indicate on the bottom of his ballot before he handed it in. whether or not he favored calling a constitutional convention. 4 Latos of Indiana, 1827, 22. 452 HISTORY OF INDIANA ing a law authorizing a referendum on the subject at the ensuing August election.^ This was six years earher than the constitution demanded a referendum, but the friends of the movement urged with force that the people had an undeniable and inalienable right to call a constitutional convention whenever they pleased. The result of this referendum vote was that out of a total of 126,133 votes cast at the State election there were 33,173 for a convention, and 28,843 opposed. A majority of all the voters had not expressed themselves on the subject.^ When the vote was reported to the General Assembly, it provoked a serious debate."^ It was generally agreed that the vote was not decisive ; that it did not warrant the Gen- eral Assembly in calling the proposed convention, but many members favored submitting the question again to a popu- lar vote at the next August election. Other members op- posed all agitation on the subject as calculated to bring po- litical disquiet and unrest. The times, it was pointed out, were especially dangerous. The State was almost bankrupt, taxes were high, and times were hard. Of all times the present, it was urged, would be the worst to agitate a change in the fundamental law.^ 5 Laws of Indiana, 1845, 97. This convention stiould liave power to "alter, revise, or amend the constitution." 6 Tri-toeekly State Journal, Jan. 15, 1847. 7 Tri-iveekly State Journal, Jan. 13, and Jan. 15. 1847. The debate is given almost in full. Henry Secrest of Putnam county, John Taryan, Cyrus L. Dunham of Washington and George W. Julian of Wayne, were the principal spealiers. 8 The committee to which it was referred in the House favored a convention. The debates are given in the State Journal, Jan. 13, 1847. The minority, all Whigs, made an unfavorable report. This was written by John Bowling, a Whig editor of Terre Haute. The following edi- torial of the Indiana State Journal, Jan. 5, 1847, sums up the opposition or Whig argument: "A change in the fundamental law should not be made for trivial causes. It ought to be made only to abrogate some great wrong resulting from its provisions. Frequent changes impair the respect in which a constitution, to be valuable, ought to be held by the people. We hold that when a mode of changing the constitution is provided by the constitution itself that any other mode is wrong. It must be done by that mode. Any other course is revolution itself. Our constitution has such a provision. The present assembly nor the past has any right to call a convention or submit the question to a vote. The CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION OF 1850 453 In spite of the efforts of a determined group of mem- bers, the question was not favored by the Assembly. It is noticeable that what might be called the professional politicians avoided taking sides in this discussion. The ref- erendum in 1846 was not mentioned in the leading papers, and evidently was not discussed on the stump. The gov- ernor in reporting the result of the vote in his annual mes- sage made no recommendation that might be construed into a position. The demand for a convention, however, did not cease. The Democratic Party, in general, favored the proposition. The court practice, they said, was especially costly. Pro- bate courts and associate judges were popularly regarded as worse than useless — they were meddlesome. The jus- tices had once been the chief officers of the county, but since a board of commissioners had taken their duties, they had become petty politicians, valuable only to those who wished to bribe a court or corrupt a jury. Many good citizens, regardless of party, also looked upon the appointing power of the governor as a source of much evil. They thought that such officers as the auditor, treasurer, and other State officers should be elected by the people rather than by the General Assembly. The recent attempt by the governor to barter nominations to the su- preme court for a seat in the United States Senate had given a concrete point to the general demand to limit the appointing power of the governors. By 1849 Governor Whitcomb, sure of his promotion to the United States Sen- ate, came out openly for a convention in his annual mes- sage. He no doubt put his finger on the weakest point in the government under the old constitution when he em- phasized the evil of private and local legislation. In the annual volumes of laws for the previous four or five ses- sions the local laws had outnumbered the general five or vote at last August was not a warrant for a convention. It was less than half that polled for governor. This legislature clearly has no right to malie iwovision for calling a convention. There is no demand. No part of it is oppressive. It is better than can be made now." Then comes the prosperity plea. It is a fine statement of the conservative argument against change. (30) 454 HISTORY OF INDIANA six to one. In the volume of 1849 there are 343 acts published as "Local Laws" and 273 as "General Laws," of the latter over 200 being strictly "local." The time of the whole session was consumed in political jockeying and log rolling.^ The annual volume of laws noted above contains 616 laws and thirty-seven joint resolutions. i*^ § 89 Organizing the Convention The General Assembly of 1848 took up the convention question and passed an act submitting the question of call- ing a constitutional convention to the voters. ^^ A large ma- jority of the votes cast at the ensuing August election were in favor of calling a convention. i- The following General Assembly by act approved January 18, 1850, ordered an election of delegates. The election was held at the same time and in all essential parts was the same as an election 9 Prof. James A. Woodburn in Indiana Magazine of History, X, 238. 10 One of these laws clianged the name of Belsora Barsheba Ingle- wright to Belsora Barsheba Thompson. Another permitted Charity Ann Wise to sue for divorce in Marion county, instead of in her home coun- ty. The following editorial stated the Whig position : "The General Assembly will have to prepare for the Constitutional Convention. We hope an early day for an election of delegates and the meeting may be fixed. These members ought to be elected at the April election and meet in June. Let the result be voted on in October. No party consid- eration ought to hold in selecting delegates. If the election is held in August it will be partisan. We voted for a Constitutional Convention because we wanted the following changes: Biennial sessions; election of judges and all other offices; a general banking law; a homestead exemption law, fines to go to the school funds of the township. Most important of all, elections by the legislature are corrupt. The course of Governor Whitcomb ought to settle such elections forever." iiLfftos of Indiana, 1S4S, 36. The first bill introduced in the House and the fourth in the Senate were the convention bills. The records bear no evidence of the discussion, if any, that was had. The votes usually stood about 60 to 40 in the House. The only parts of the act that seem to have been debated related to the number and selection of the dele- gates. One facetious representative, in answer to the evident tenor of this discussion, moved that the House appoint each member a delegate. They finally did the nearest possible thing to this by maliing each As- sembly district a delegate district. 12 The vote stood 81,500 for and 57.418 against. The total vote cast for the candidates for governor were 147,232 (no report from Fayette). The aflirmative majority for the convention was thus about 8,000. CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION OF 1850 455 of members of the General Assembly. There were 150 del- egates chosen from the same districts as the members of the House and Senate, except in two unimportant dis- tricts.i3 There was little interest in the campaign as far as elect- ing delegates was concerned. It was hoped by many to make the elections non-partisan, but such was not the case as a rule. It seems true, however, that the Whigs, being in a minority, took considerably less political interest in the election than the Democrats. A caucus of the Whig members of the General Assembly declared in favor of a constitutional convention and espe- cially urged that the following changes be made in the con- stitution. All officers should be elected by popular vote; the General Assembly should be prohibited from borrow- ing money except for urgent necessities; the county sem- inary funds should be transferred to the fund for common schools; the General Assembly should meet biennially; lo- cal legislation should be prohibited; the number of offices should be reduced and the establishment of new ones for- bidden; a homestead exemption should be provided; and more encouragement should be given to agriculture, min- ing, and manufacturing. 14 In the county of Marion the Whigs offered to divide the ticket equally and make no contest, but the Democrats re- fused.i^ In Jefferson county the Whigs compromised on a ticket of two Whigs and one Democrat. There were many other instances in which fusion tickets were elected with- out contest, but fusion was not general. Of the 50 dele- gates from senatorial districts 33 were Democrats and 17 were Whigs ; of the 100 delegates from representative dis- tricts 64 were Democrats and 36 Whigs. Of the 50 State senators elected at the time 33 were Democrats and 17 Whigs; of the representatives 62 were Democrats and 38 Whigs. It will thus be seen that the political affiliations of 13 Laws of Indiana, 1849, 29. 14 Indiana Tri-weekly Journal, May 1, 1850. 15 Indiana State Journal, May 1, 1850. 456 HISTORY OF INDIANA the members of the General Assembly and the constitu- tional convention were the same. The delegates, 150 in number, assembled in the capitol building, October 7, 1850, and were organized by the sec- retary of State, Charles H. Test.^"^ They were a repre- sentative body of citizens. The best known men of the State at the time, however, were not present. From our distance, one would say that Robert Dale Owen, Alvin P. Hovey, Thomas A. Hendricks, W. S. Holman, Schuyler Col- fax and Horace P. Biddle were among its most distinguished members, but they were young and mostly without wide reputation at the time. The really noted men of the con- vention as they gathered together for the first time, were Thomas D. Walpole, Abel Pepper, Daniel Kelso, James G. Reed, David Kilgore, Ross Smiley, Michael G. Bright, Wil- liam M. Dunn, George W. Carr, David Wallace, Jacob Page Chapman, James Rariden and John I. Morrison. Seventy- five of the members had served in the General Assembly, thirteen of whom had sat in the last session. Twenty-five more made this the stepping stone to later legislative serv- ice. Fourteen saw service in the United States Congress; two later became governors, while one was an ex-governor. There were seven well-known editors, three of whom came from Indianapolis. The great Whig lawyers of the State were noticeably absent. A widespread prejudice against educated men existed at the time. There were three grad- uates of the State University and perhaps as many more were graduates of other colleges. § 90 Politics of the Convention The spirit of Jackson controlled the convention. Daniel Reed, a delegate of Monroe and a professor in the State Uni- versity, referred to Jackson as "a man of as remarkable sagacity as ever lived."^^ As a consequence of this Jack- sonian influence it was attempted to strengthen democracy 16 Indiana Tri-wcekly Journal, Jan. 3, 1850. A list of the delegates with their districts and party affiliations is given in the State Journal Jan. 4, 1851. 17 Debates and Proceedings of the Convention, 221. CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION OF 1850 457 among the people by bringing the government nearer the voter. The secretary, treasurer, and auditor of State, for- merly appointed by the General Assembly, were made elective. To these were added the new office of superin- tendent of public instruction to be filled by popular elec- tion. Besides the above, the judges of the supreme and cir- cuit courts were made elective by the people for six-year terms. 1^ The prosecuting attorneys and the local jus- tices, all formerly appointed, were made elective, the former by the voters in the judicial circuits and the latter by the voters of the townships. In the county the voters were made the electors of a clerk of the circuit court, an auditor, recorder, treasurer, sheriff, coroner, and surveyor for each county. The General Assembly was given permission to establish other elective officers, a power which it has used quite liberally, if not frequently abused. Some of the offi- cers so elected were eligible only for one term, but the ma- jority were permitted to hold for two consecutive terms. In dealing with the suffrage elections and office-holding, the general principles of Jacksonian Democracy then prevalent were applied. In general the convention made the most liberal application of the principles of manhood suffrage and popular elections. It was accused in many places of playing politics by allowing unnaturalized citi- zens to vote after one year's residence. In dealing with the negroes, both free and slave, the convention illustrated the confused political notions of the times. It reenacted the provisions of the Ordinance of 1787 with a bruskness that indicated an absolute majority of Abolitionists, yet the provisions refusing negroes the right to vote or even to settle in the State are, in spirit, directly contradictory to the above enactment. Not only these provisions, but the speeches of the members on the question of slavery, show the utmost diversity of opinion. • ISA significant provision in this connection was the section provid- ing that the State publish the decisions of the supreme court. Formerly these had been published privately by Judge Blacliford. The charge w^as made that he neglected his official duties in preparing the opinions for the press and that he made too much money off the volumes. 458 HISTORY OF INDIANA Not less than forty set speeches on slavery, few of them dealing with any question before the convention, were made by the members.^'^ In the article on the legislative department two impor- tant changes were made, both dictated by the overwhelming proof of experience. One change was the substitution of biennial for annual sessions of the General Assmbly. The other forbade the General Assembly making special or local laws. In this field the granting of divorces by the General Assembly had occasioned most hostile criticism. For two years the churches had opposed this exercise of power by a legislative body. A former General Assembly had in- vested the State courts with power to try divorce bills, but the Assembly could not by its own act divest itself of the power and the abuse continued. So far, heavy-footed experience guided the convention with a certain step. But when the subjects of education, benevolent institutions, corporations, and personal rights were reached, the members found trouble in coming to an agreement. In the field of education there was an effort made to give the convention a vision of its duty, but with- out success. The Constitution of 1816 is far more favor- able toward education than is that of 1850. The seminaries were destroyed and there was a strong sentiment favoring abolishing the State University, giving all funds to the public schools. Likewise the new constitution shows little influence of the awakening of the people to their duty to the unfortunate members of society. The newly established schools for deaf and dumb, blind, and insane are specifically provided for; but the wide application of benevolence made by the State at present finds no warrant in fundamental law. In the field of corporations, compromise was effected 19 During the session James Rariden introduced a resolution endors- ing the Compromise of 1S50. This was done to break the alliance be- tween the Abolitionists and the Democrats in Indiana. It was a purely selfish political moAe and failed. It was condemned most severely by the State Journal, Feb. 22, 1851. CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION OF 1850 459 between those on the one hand who favored a general law for all corporations and those who wished to reestablish a State bank, and those who opposed all corporate bodies. The article on "corporations" is a poor apology for the weary days of speechmaking on the kindred subjects of "debt," "banks," and "corporation control." In the field of natural rights the fight was on the home- stead exemption and on woman's rights. No better evi- dence of the bigotry and the ignorance of the times exists than the attacks of the self-styled churchmen on Robert Dale Owen, who led the fight for women's rights. His vic- tory is a tribute, however, to the open-mindedness and na- tive honesty of the members. Taken as a whole, it is not a great constitution. It suf- fers in comparison with the one it displaced. Its departures from that instrument in most cases are of very doubtful value. Its justification rests on the substitution of bi- ennial for annual Assemblies and abolishment of private and local legislation. On the other hand its critics rightly insist that the judiciary was weakened and a vast field opened for sinister partisan politics. § 91 The New Constitution The convention adjourned Monday morning, February 10, 1851. It had been in session eighteen weeks. No event in the State's history had received as much attention and publicity. The daily papers, and many of the larger week- lies, published the proceedings entire from day to day or from week to week. Innumerable articles by citizens in praise or condemnation of the work appeared in the papers. Answers by the members in their own defense were equally plentiful. Editorials explained the work of the convention day by day and gave the editor's opinion of its value. It was an eighteen weeks' course in political science for the citizens of the State. The completed constitution was read at the last session of the convention on the morning of February 10. It ap- peared at once on the front pages of the newspapers, many 460 HISTORY OF INDIANA of which repeated its publication in the three or four suc- ceeding issues.-'^ The convention ordered 55,000 copies of the constitution, 50,000 in English and 5,000 in German, printed for distribution. These appeared early in March. ^i The convention had suggested that the new constitu- tion be submitted to the people for ratification or rejection at the approaching August election. The General Assem- bly affirmed this suggestion February 14, 1851, and the governor's proclamation followed immediately, directing the election officers to carry the order into effect.^^ There was no organized opposition to the ratification. Both parties favored the new constitution. At the ensuing election every county gave an affirmative majority but Ohio. Starke county cast a unanimous vote for the consti- tution. The total vote was 113,230 for, and 27,638 against ratification, a majority of 85,592 out of a total vote of 140,868. The vote for the exclusion of colored persons was substantially the same, being an affirmative vote of 113,828 out of a total vote of 135,701.-3 Three counties, Lagrange, Randolph and Steuben, voted against negro exclusion. The total vote on the constitution was little short of that cast for congressmen. The total vote in the ten congressional districts was 148,529. That thfere was no partisan opposi- tion to the constitution is shown by this vote. The Demo- crats carried the State by a majority of only 9,469.-^ The new constitution went into operation November 1, 1851. The General Assembly elected in August, 1851, met as directed by the old constitution. The first general elec- tion under the new constitution was held in October, 1852, the old officers holding until the newly elected ones were qualified and took their positions according to law. There was no jar in the operations of the State government dur- ing the change. 20 Indiana State Journal, Feb. 15. 1851, 21 Indiana State Journal, ^larch 15, 1851. They were printed for the New Albany Ledger at the Cincinnati Gazette office. 22 state Journal, Feb. 22, 1851. 23 state Journal, Sept. 20, 1851. 24 state Journal, Aug. 30, 1851. CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION OF 1850 461 One of the objections urged at first against a consti- tutional convention was that it would cost an enormous sum of money at a time when the State was almost bankrupt, and could ill afford to spend any money except for the most urgent need. The total expense for the eighteen weeks' session as shown by the State treasurer's report was $85,043.82.25 35 Documentary Journal, 1851, 8 ; 1852, 7. CHAPTER XXI POLITICS FROM 1840 TO 1852 § 92 A Bankrupt State As soon as the political frenzy of 1840 had spent itself, the citizens of Indiana began to give their serious attention to the condition of their State government. One ugly fact stared them squarely in the face. That fact was that the State system of internal improvements was a failure. Long successions of mudholes marked the places where the people had expected to see hurrying boats bearing the produce of prosperous farmers to expectant buyers. For ten years the people had worked patiently, buoyed up by promises of ig- norant and dishonest politicians in the hope of seeing their State provided with an adequate transportation system. The financial condition of the State was alarming. The auditor reported that the total assessment valuation of the State had dropped from over $107,000,000 to $91,000,000. The income of the State from taxation had likewise dropped $170,901, leaving a net income for 1840 of only $192,786 from this source. ^ The current expenses for the year were $136,749. There would thus be left a sum of $34,152 to meet the interest at six per cent on upwards of $12,000,000 bonded debt.^ The outlook was gloomy enough. Turning away from the whole subject of internal improvement, the General Assembly gave its attention to governmental reorganiza- tion. The ways and means committee, to whom was re- ferred the auditor's annual statement for 1840, reported 1 Auditor's report, in Lmcs of Indiana, 1840, 228. 2 Treasurer's report, in Laios of Indiana, 1840, 236. POLITICS FROM 1840 TO 1852 463 seven bills providing for a complete reorganization of the fiscal policy and machinery of the State. ^ The first was entitled a "Bill to Value the Property of the State."^ The law directed that the county assessor, an officer created by the third bill of the list, to appraise the real and personal property of the State at its cash value. On this basis the State and county governments were to make tax levies. County and State boards of equalization were provided for. The second bill, when enacted into law, established the offices of county and State auditors to be filled by popular election.^ The fourth bill defined the county treasurer's duties; the fifth pointed out the mode of making tax levies ; the sixth subjected the private stock in the State Bank to taxation the same as any other prop- erty; the seventh directed a levy of forty cents to meet the interest on the State debt.'^ This revolution in the taxing system was accomplished by the Whig Party. A minority of about twenty-five rep- resentatives opposed all the measures. In the "Address of the Democratic Members of the Legislature," dated Febru- ary 13, 1841, the measures were hotly denounced.'^ The prosperous condition of the State in 1834 was contrasted with the dismal outlook in 1840. The annual running ex- penses of the State in 1834 were given as $30,000 ; in 1840 they had mounted to $840,000. There was nothing to show for the expenditure except a few lines of stagnant pools and a bitter experience. The Whigs assured the taxpayers that the levy of forty cents would pay all the State debt. The fund commission- ers likewise gave it as their opinion that the levy would soon put the State finances on a sound foundation. The law, which is still in substance on the statute books, was good, but the party that placed it on the statute book 3 House Journal, 1840, 306. • 4 Laws of Indiana, 1840, ch. I. 5 Laws of Indiana, 1840, ch. II. 6 Laws of Indiana, 1840, chs. I to IX inclusive. 7 Vincennes Western Sun, Mar. 6, 1841. "Ttie time has come for the people to take a hand. Demagogues, temporizers, gambling politicians must be put down. Is liberty worth such a tax?" 464 HISTORY OF INDIANA was never given complete power again in the State. By- one of those inexplicable turns in popular government public opinion grasped the Whig party, internal improve- ments, the high tax, and the ruined State, all in a single thought which neither fact nor argument seemed able to alter. Public opinion, as is usual, was right. The Whig Party had had complete control of the State government at least since 1834. During that time taxes had increased eight-fold.s The party was guilty of flagrant misgovern- ment. Its punishment was not unmerited.-' The Democrats had found a vulnerable spot in the Whig political coat which they never failed to take advantage of. It made little different what the Whigs proposed or what argument they adduced in its support, the sufficient politi- cal answer was "internal improvements." During the ses- sion of the General Assembly of 1841-42, a series of articles appeared in the Indiana State Journal on the subject of the general responsibility for the internal improvements pol- icy.io The author, who was thoroughly conversant with the facts, made it clear that many prominent Democrats were supporters of the policy, but he failed to acquit his own party. The Whig Party, having lost its spirit, had become a vast host, unorganized, reposing on their arms, their leaders fallen or deserted. Many who had formerly taken a fighting interest became sullen and disgusted, "stung with regrets" as an editor put it, and gave no more 8 For a clear inclictuient of the Whig Party see au address by Robert Dale Owen to the "Citizens of Posey county," Aug:ust, 1841; published in the Indkina State Sentinel, October 11. and In the Western Sun, No- vember 13. "Our State debt has run up in six years to one-tenth of all our property. Our tax is eight times as high as it was six years ago. Our bonds are hawked about at half i>rice like those of a bankrupt. Our check for interest is dishonored. All is lost, save honor, and it is for- feited." 9 The following election gave the Democrats fifty-six representatives and the Whigs forty-four. The voters complained that they had to pay 9 per cent, interest on their mortgages when money was worth only 6. The financial question was finally settled by the "Butler Bill." See chapter on "Internal Improvements." Indiaiia, Journal, Aug. 28, 1841; Western Sun, Sept. 4, 1841. ^0 Indiana Journal, January and Februaj'y, 1842. POLITICS FROM 1840 TO 1852 465 attention to politics.^! The whole period from 1840 to 1846 was one of distress in Indiana. It was the long reaction after the debauch. The farmers pulled themselves together and plied their trade in dogged silence. Their pride as well as their prosperity was gone. A committee of Whig members of the General Assembly at the close of the session issued a long, well-written ad- dress, but not even the eloquence of Theodore Barnett nor the sound sense of John D. Defrees could make much im- pression. i- ''Amid the ruin and desolation which surround the Hoosier affairs, they have only one thing to be proud of, and that is their supreme bench. This is an ornament to American jurisprudence," remarked Pleasant Hackle- man, editor of the Rushville WhigJ^ The Democrats played a waiting game. The salaries of the State officials were reduced, useless offices were abol- ished, and the bankrupt State government relieved of every burden possible.^ ^ The thoughts of the people, long cen- tered on the activity of the State, were gradually directed into other channels. The schools, the churches, the benevo- lent institutions, agricultural societies, labor unions, num- berless organizations for the betterment of society, the pro- tection of the unfortunate and the innocent, began to re- ceive systematic attention and support. The influx of settlers and especially of workmen on the canal had seriously demoralized society. This was not no- ticed, or perhaps the vicious element did not assert itself, 11 Indianapolis Daily Journal, Jan. 5 and 7, 1842. 12 Indianapolis Daily Journal, Jan. 18, 1842. 13 Indianapolis Daily Journal, June 7. 1842. 14 "Our investigation into frauds of the system will exhibit a scene of villainy, fraud and corruption, scarcely, if ever, equaled in the annals of any country. We have appointed a special agent to close up these 'splendid financial operations,' to sue delinquent officers and recover what is possible. Most have been sanctioned by law. We have also discharged that whole horde of blood suclj^ers, the boards of commis- sioners and engineers. In the actions of that most unfortunate and designing conclave of men, the people will discern in bold relief the workings of that aristocratic policy which had its paternity in Alex- ander Hamilton and the elder Adams," John W. Davis in "Democratic Address to the Voters" at close of the session of General Assembly of 1842. Published in Western Sun March 5. 466 HISTORY OF INDIANA so long as times were flush. But with the pinching years of 1839 and 1840 many persons, thrown out of employment, were forced to the hard choice between the miseries of ex- treme poverty and vice. What the newspapers called a wave of crime swept over the State. A Marion county grand jury, in its report to the court, solemnly pronounced the taverns asylums of immorality and crime rather than places of rest and refreshment for travelers. The recent General Assembly had required all liquor retailers to secure a county license. The law had the effect of concentrating the drinking as well as the drunkards in the taverns. With the drinkers came their parasites, the gamblers and the prostitutes. The report of the grand jury awakened the capital like a fire alarm. ^^ Seven days after the report was made public, the citizens met in mass meeting. The cen- sure of the grand jury was discussed, and it was decided that it was not wide of the truth. Immediate action was demanded. Under the law the voters had a right, by ma- jority remonstrance, to keep the county commissioners from issuing a liquor license. A remonstrance was drawn up and quickly signed by 224 of the 364 eligible voters of the town. In less than three hours the whole work had been accomplished, barring saloons from the town for three years. 16 § 93 Campaign of 1844 The election of 1840 closed the period of personal poli- tics in Indiana.^^- Men of all parties had united to elect Harrison. Among his supporters there was little cohesion except what was furnished by the personality of the Presi- dent. How helpless the Whigs were is shown by their con- dition after the death of their leader. Under the lead of Clay a bill for a new United States Bank was prepared and rushed through Congress. In due time it reached President Tyler, who promptly attached his veto. The breach produced by the quarrel between Clay and 15 The report is given in the Indiana Journal, May 29, 1841. '^^Incliuna Journal, June 18. 1841. This meeting was held June 5. It was presided over by Samuel MeiTill. president of the State Bank. 17 Adam Leonard, "The Period of Personal Politics in Indiana." Mss. POLITICS FROM 1840 TO 1852 467 The Democrats car- ried all the dlG- tricts except the Fifth in 1852. Indiana in 1852. By E. V. Shockley. 468 HISTORY OF INDIANA President Tyler extended to Indiana. The officers who en- joyed the presidential patronage maintained a formal alle- giance to the administration. The great majority of the voters, together with the party organization, followed Clay. They denounced the President for what they chose to call his betrayal of the party. The Democratic Party profited indirectly by the de- moralization of the Whigs, though many of the disaffected went over to that party. The struggle of 1840 eliminated Van Buren, who had come to be the chief liability of the Democratic Party in the West. He had all the weaknesses of Jackson without any of Jackson's strength. Neither party had any leader at the time, who, like Jackson or Har- rison, towered head and shoulders above the multitude. The old issues of the Whig Party, the tariff, internal improve- ments and the bank, the championing of which had given Clay his hold on the party, had lost their appeal. The bank had become an impossibility under Tyler. Thousands of Indiana Whigs were interested in their own State Bank, whose prosperity would be endangered by a new United States Bank. The internal improvement issue had turned to ashes in the mouths of the Whigs; and the American tariff had come to be regarded with suspicion by the farm- ing class. The period from 1841 to 1844 in Indiana was one of political realignment. Not only was there a change in the political management of the parties, but the old issues were discarded. The secret of the sweeping success of the Demo- crats in Indiana in the election of 1844 is due to the fact that that party first freed itself from the dead issues of the past, and placed itself in harmony with the advanced thought of the times. The Whigs tried to win the campaign on the same old issues, with the same old machinery, and with the same candidates which they had employed since 1824. They seemed incapable of profiting either by the thought or the experience of the previous fifteen years. Since the beginning of the rivalry between the Whig and the Jacksonian Parties, there had been two opposing commercial institutions in the State. The banks and the POLITICS FROM 1840 TO 1852 469 land offices controlled the money of the State. The Demo- crats had always had control of the land offices, and the Whigs had always controlled the banks. The General As- sembly of 1841 appointed Nathan B. Palmer to make a thorough investigation of the condition of the bank.^® j^ 1843 the General Assembly, still on the trail of the bank, took the management of it out of Whig hands and gave it to Judge James Morrison, a Democrat. As an offset to this advantage the Democrats lost control of the land offices from 1841 to 1845. It is to be observed, however, that both the bank and the land offices were rapidly losing their political influence. The opening battle of the new era in Indiana politics was the election of the United States senator to succeed 0. H. Smith, whose term expired in 1843. The two parties were almost evenly matched in the General Assembly, so evenly that one or two votes would determine the contest. On the first ballot, 0. H. Smith, the Whig candidate, re- ceived 72 votes ; Tilghman A. Howard, the Democratic can- didate, 74; Edward Hannegan, an independent Democratic candidate, 3 ; Joseph G. Marshall, a Whig, 1. On the second ballot Smith received 75 votes, Howard 74. Daniel Kelso, a Whig senator from Switzerland county, voted for Hanne- gan. On the sixth ballot the Democrats dropped Howard and supported Hannegan, who then received 76 votes and was elected. 1^ Kelso was openly charged with selling his vote.20 The Whigs by public resolution denounced him. It was the last opportunity of the Whig Party to elect a United States senator in Indiana. The bitterness was not confined to the Whigs, however. Howard and his friends never forgave some of the Democratic leaders for their part 18 Laws of Indiana, 1841, ch. 170. 19 Senate Journal, 1842, 349-355. 20 Indianapolis Journal, Jan. 25 and Feb. 1, 1843. These numbers contain articles on this remarkable election, for which all members later apologized. The 73 Democi-atic members made a statement In the Sen- tinel Feb. 7, 1843, over their own signatures, that Governor Whitcomb did not help defeat Howard. David Hoover, of Wayne county, classed himself as a Democrat, but Kelso, of Switzerland, did not. Of. Sentinel, Jan. 31 and Feb. 7. (31) 470 HISTORY OF INDIANA in the contest, though it is difficult to see how they could have elected him. The Democrats swept the State in the election of 1843. James Whitcomb succeeded Samuel Bigger in the governor's office. He was the first governor elected by the Democrats in Indiana. Eight out of the ten congressmen were elected on the Democratic ticket. In 1841 the Whigs had elected six out of the seven congressmen. This reversal was said to be due partly to a Democratic gerrymander by the Gen- eral Assembly of 1842.-^ In the State legislature the sen- ate in 1843 stood 26 to 24, the house 55 to 45 in favor of the Democrats. The Whig junto at Indianapolis was driven from power after a continuous administration of eighteen years. The Methodist and Presbyterian churches deserted the Whigs, especially after it became apparent that Clay was to be the candidate in 1844.-- As soon as Harrison was dead, Clay and his followers began squaring away for the race in 1844. A barbecue in Clay's honor was prepared at Indianapolis, October 5, 1842. Delegations from all parts of the State visited the capital to hear their leader, and to take counsel together concerning the approaching contest.--' It was determined to conduct the campaign along the old lines. Van Buren was the only Democratic candidate above the horizon at that time. Had he been the candidate in 1844, the plan of the Whigs might have been carried to success, but as it turned out their course was fatal. Such men as Robert Dale Owen, Joseph A. Wright, An- drew Kennedy, James Whitcomb and John W. Davis, preaching the new Democracy, were more than a match for the old Whigs. They pleaded for human rights, individual liberty, private initiative, that it was more the duty of the State to care for the unfortunate, the feeble, educate the children, and foster individual development, than to con- 21 Laws of Indiana, 1842. p. 38 ; Doily Sentinel, Feb. 10, 1843. 22 Western Sun, Sept. 2. 1843. 23 Indianapolis Journal, Sept. 23, 1842. POLITICS FROM 1840 TO 1852 471 cern itself entirely with aiding bankers, manufacturers and transportation companies.- ^ Even the hitherto impregnable fortress of a high pro- tective tariff was assaulted by the enthusiastic young Democrats. James Whitcomb, then a candidate for gov- ernor on the Democratic ticket, formerly a supporter of Clay, showed by the logic of statistics that workmen in the factories were receiving $500 per year, while farm hands received only $213. There were ten farm hands in Indi- ana to one factory hand. The farm products were not pro- tected, but when the farm products were made into manu- factured goods, they were highly protected. The wheat and corn which the farmer sold were free, but the plow which he bought was protected. The best markets for the Indiana farmers were among the planters of the South. These same planters were being ruined by the high tariff. It was the first time the protection policy had been chal- lenged in Indiana, and it created considerable alarm in the Whig camp.^^ The Whigs met in State convention at Indianapolis, January 16, 1844, for the purpose of inaugurating the cam- paign. There was no apparent lack of enthusiasm. An exceptionally strong electoral ticket, headed by Henry S. Lane and Joseph G. Marshall, was nominated. A central committee of twenty-six members was chosen. A novelty was instituted in the form of a board of sixty advocates, whose business it was to stump the State. This was the beginning of what later came to be known as the speaker's 24 The following sentiment by Senator William Allen, of Ohio, made the rounds of the Democa*atic press in Indiana in 1843-4. It is a fair sample of the eloquence of the young Democratic speakers of 1844: "Democracy is a sentiment not to be appalled, corrupted nor compro- mised. It knows no baseness, cowers at no danger, oppresses no weak- ness. Fearless, generous, humane, it rebukes the arrogant, cherishes honor, and sympathises with the humble. It asks nothing it will not concede. It concedes nothing it does not demand. Destructive only to despotism, it is the only preserver of liberty, labor and prosperity. It is the sentiment of freedom, equal rights, and equal obligations." West- ern Sun, July 1, 1843. 25 State Journal, April 11, May 12, May 19, May 23, May 28, 1843. 472 HISTORY OF INDIANA bureau.^" The convention also appointed sixty delegates, five from each of the twelve judicial districts, to the Na- tional Convention.-" The Whigs met in the hall of the House of Representatives. In their enthusiasm, while cheering the speakers, many of the members stood on the tops of the desks, leaving the imprint of their hob-nailed shoes on the furniture. The Indianapolis Sentinel on this account referred to the convention as a "hob-nailed" mob. The Whigs accepted the title of "Hob-nails" without demur. -s Whig campaign papers were established in almost every county, backed financially by the Whig County Clubs. The Central Committee planned nineteen mass meetings in the different parts of the State, each to be the occasion of a barbecue and at least three addresses.-^ Innumerable speak- ings, pole raisings, and rallies served to increase the gen- eral interest and excitement. In the matter of substantial argument the Whigs were weak. By agreement Clay and Van Buren had eliminated the Texas question. Tyler had tried in vain to build a party around that issue. When Tyler failed his followers, to the great dismay of Clay, rallied around Polk and beat Van Buren in the convention. The Whigs of Indiana de- nounced the scheme to annex Texas as a venture uncalled for by the people; entirely southern in its origin and sup- port; unconstitutional; an unwarranted aggression upon a weak neighbor; assumption of a vast debt for the direct 26 Loganspoi-t Telegraph, Feb. 10, 1844 ; Indianapolis Whig Rifle, Mar. 14. 1844 ; Indianapolis Journal, May 25, 1844. 27 Indianapolis Journal, Mar. 23, 1844. 28 Indianapolis Journal, April 13, 1844. 29 Indianapolis Journal, Aug. 24, 1844. The times and dates were as follows: Evansville, Sept. 14; Princeton. Sept. 18; Washington, Sept. 21; Corydon, Sept. 25; Charlestowu, Sept. 28; Bedford, Oct. 19; Madison. Oct. 2; Napoleon, Oct. 5; Cambridge City, Oct. 12; Shelby- yille, Oct. 9; Indianapolis, Oct. 22; Andersontown, Oct. 15; Rockville, Oct. 2; Lafayette, Oct. 5; Logansport. Oct. 8; Goshen. Oct. 16; Fort Wayne, Oct. 12; Laporte, Oct. 19; Terre Haute, Oct. 28. Henry S. Lane, R. W. Thompson. Hugh O'Neal, H. P. Riddle, Samuel C. Sample, John D. Defrees, Samuel Bigger, David Wallace, Albert F. White, O. H. Smith, Samuel Parker, Joseph G. Marshall and George G. Dunn were the principal speakers. POLITICS FROM 1840 TO 1852 473 benefit of a few Americans who held Texan bonds ; in brief, as a policy that had no other purpose or justification than the spread of slavery.^o Besides the tariff and bank, the Whigs hoped to secure wide support among Jackson Democrats on their proposi- tion to distribute the proceeds of the public lands. This had once been looked on with favor by Jackson and Ben- ton.31 jji the present condition of the State treasury it was thought that it would appeal with great strength to Indiana voters. The Democrats opposed the whole policy by which the national government would either assume any part of the State debts or distribute the proceeds of the public land sales. James Whitcomb said: "The effects which would result from the distribution would be deleteri- ous to the best interests of the laboring classes. It is nothing better than a direct scheme of bribery."''- A variation of the distribution policy was known as "the William Cost Johnson plan" from the name of its au- thor. By it the United States would issue national stock (currency) to the amount of $200,000,000, which would be distributed to the Western States in proportion to the public lands in each and would be received by the United States in payment for the lands. Under this plan Indiana would receive $8,519,823, which, it was urged, would go a long way on the State debt of $12,751,000."^3 The Democrats of Indiana were not backward about beginning the campaign in Indiana. As early as July 4, 1843, Senator Lewis Cass visited the State, presumably to deliver the oration at Fort Wayne on completion of the 30 Indianapolis Journal, June 29, 1844. "We say this is a question that rises above all party. It means union or disunion; the free North will never submit to it; the free West will not submit to such a tax merely to spread slavery. Our free laborers are in favor of a tariff. The admission of Texas is a step toward the abandonment of our tariff system." — Editorial. 31 Jackson's message, 1829, quoted in the Journal April 6, 1844. 32 Indianapolis Journal, May 4, 1844. 33 Indianapolis Journal, April 6, 1844 ; also April 13, 1844, 474 HISTORY OF INDIANA Wabash and Erie canal, but really to arouse the Democrats for the approaching strugg-le.^^ The Democratic State convention met at Indianapolis on the anniversary of the victory of New Orleans, Jan- uary 8, for the purpose of organization. An electoral ticket w^as nominated.^^ The general conduct of the cam- paign was similar to that of the Whigs. There were, how- ever, no joint debates. As indicated above, the party speak- ers did not usually discuss the same issues. On the tariff, internal improvement, and bank ques- tions, Polk had acted quite as often with the Whigs as with the Democrats. Governor Whitcomb, who discussed the tariff oftener than any other Democrat, did not oppose the policy so much as he opposed giving its benefit to the manu- facturing interests alone. Senator Hannegan, by far the most eloquent speaker in the State at the time, aroused enthusiasm among the young voters by his presentation of the Texas and Oregon questions. Each party had, with- out success, made an effort in Congress to get appropria- tions for the National Road and the Wabash and Erie Canal.36 The Free Soil vote worried both parties. The followers of Clay made every possible concession without avail. A Free Soil paper, the Indiana Freeman, was established at the capital and a spirited campaign waged. In the last issue of the Indiana State Journal before the election, the Whig chairman, 0. H. Smith, published a two-column ap- 34 His entire si^eech is given in tlie Indianapolis Sentinel, July 25, 1843. 35 Logansport Telegraph, Jan. 20, 1844. This ticket was as follows : Tilghman A. Howard, James G. Reed, Dr. Wm. A. Bowles, Dr. Elijah Newman, J. M. Johnson. Samuel E. Perkins, W. W. Wick, Paris C. Dun- ning, Henry W. Ellsworth, Charles W. Cathcart and Lucian P. Ferry. To these sli )uld be added Governor Whitcomb, Lieutenant Governor Jesse Briglil, Senator Hannegan, J. W. Davis, T. J. Henly, R. D. Owen and a few others, to make up the list of Democratic orators. 36 For a statement of the principles of the Democratic Party see Vin- cennes Western Sun, Nov. 2. 1844. The leading Democratic paper was the State Sentinel, edited by G. A. and J. P. Chapman. On the Cum- berland Road and Wabash and Erie Canal, see Senator Albert S. White, in Indianapolis Journal, May 7 and May 25, and John W. Davis in the Journal April 27. POLITICS FROM 1840 TO 1852 475 peal to the Free Soilers to support Clay. He published a letter, purporting to have been by Birney, the Free Soil candidate, which stated that Birney was a Democrat and had entered the race at the suggestion of the Democratic leader in order to hold the anti-slavery vote from Clay. Birney promptly pronounced the letter, known in history as the "Garland" letter, a "forgery."^^ Both parties made bids for the emigrant vote. A German paper, the Republican, was started at Cincinnati by the Whigs. Thousands of copies were distributed free to Indi- ana Germans. A German Democratic association was or- ganized in Indianapolis. To the disgust of both parties, the Germans refused to get excited, and went about their business much as if there were no contest going on.^^ Cor- responding attempts were made to influence the Irish voters.^'^ The results of the elections were unfavorable to the Whigs. The August elections returned an equal number of each party to the State Senate, but a majority of ten Whigs to the House.^o The presidential elections in No- vember gave the Whigs 67,867 votes, the Democrats 70,181, and the Free Soilers 2,106, a Democratic plurality of 2,314 and an absolute majority of 208.^*1 § 94 Political Demoralization When the General Assembly convened December 2, 1844, a combination of Whigs and Democrats, on the ninth ballot, elected Alexander C. Stevenson, a Whig of Putnam county, speaker over the veteran Whig politician, Milton Stapp.42 37 Indianapolis State Journal, Nov. 2, 1844. 38 Indiana Journal, April 13 and Aug. 24, 1844. 39 Whig Rifle, July 8, 1844. 40 Indiana Journal, Nov. 9, 1844, gives a full list of members, vrith political affiliations. . 41 Indiana Journal, Nov. 30, 1844. The vote is given by counties. There is great difficulty in classifying the members politically. When the General Assembly tried to elect a United States senator later it was found that the House favored a Whig, and the Senate was a tie. 42 Indiana Journal, Dec. 7, 1844. 476 HISTORY OF INDIANA The election of a United States senator to succeed Al- bert S. White of Lafayette was the principal political duty which fell upon the Assembly of 1844. Early in the ses- sion there began to appear indications that the Senate would refuse to go into joint session for the purpose. The Whigs paid no attention to the rumors until a four-column editorial in the last Sentinel of the year advocated indefinite postponement of the election. The Sentinel urged in favor of the movement that the Whigs had so gerrymandered the State in 1840 that the Democrats did not get a fair pro- portion of the representatives. As proof of the fact they pointed out that they had elected all State officers and eight of the ten congressmen in 1843 and had carried the State for Polk in 1844. In spite of this they had lost the Gen- eral Assembly.^2 The Whigs regarded the whole proceed- ings as a bluff until January 9, 1845, when the Senate, by a strict party vote, 25 to 25, Lieutenant Governor Bright giving the casting vote, decided not to go into an elec- tion at all. The Whigs ascribed the action of the Senate to the ambition of Governor Whitcomb to succeed Senator White. The whole subject reflects little lustre on the po- litical morality of either party. The Whigs had threat- ened such a bolt two years before, when Hannegan was elected. A Democratic Assembly had recently enacted a law making it the duty to elect a senator at the session immediately preceding the expiration of the senatorial term. The August election of 1845 confirmed the Democrats in their prediction that the Assembly would be Democratic. Of the newly elected State senators ten were Whigs and seven Democrats, leaving that body a tie, while in the House there was a clear Democratic majority of ten.^^ The Whigs succeeded in electing only two congressmen, Caleb B. Smith in the Fourth District, and E. W. McGaughey in the 'iS Indiana Journal, Jan. 1, 1845; the Indiana Journal, Jan. 29, 1845, contains a siDeech on the subject by John D. Defrees, delivered in the Senate Jan. 6. The speaker goes into the political history of the last four Assemblies. 44 Indiana Journal, Aug. 27, 1845. POLITICS FROM 1840 TO 1852 477 Seventh, the latter defeating Joseph A. Wright by 151 votes. There was little at issue in any of the contests of the year. The Whig Party was rapidly waning in strength. There seemed to be a clique of ex-officeholders, high up in the councils of the party, who were determined to rule the party or ruin it. When they failed to nominate their man in convention they brought out an independent candidate, thus insuring Democratic success.^^ The Democratic Party likewise was not without its internal dissentions, largely of the same nature. There was the Hunker-Barnburner division; the Bright- Whitcomb jealousy; and the Wright- Hannegan feud. The first of the divisions was between the conservative wing, represented by Chapman and the Sentinel, and the progressive wing, represented by John W. Davis, S. F. Covington of the Madison Courier, and Morrison, formerly of the Indiana Democrat. The second division, between Whitcomb and Bright, was the first indi- cation of the slavery question in Indiana Democracy. Bright was a pro-slavery slave owner, while Whitcomb was a Free Soiler. The last mentioned dissention was a pri- vate quarrel due to personal political ambitions. § 95 The Free Soilers in Indiana, 1846-1850 The year 1846 found the Democrats and Whigs engaged in a gubernatorial struggle, with James Whitcomb a can- didate for reelection on the Democratic ticket and Joseph G. Marshall of Madison heading the Whig ticket. The Whig convention had met at -Indianapolis January 9, 1846, and nominated Marshall and Godlove S. Orth on a plat- form referring rather vaguely to the payment of the State debt, so that the reputation of the State might be preserved, and to the control of all of Oregon, which justly belonged to the United States.^^ The Democrats met, as usual, on January 8, and nominated Whitcomb and Paris C. Dun- ning of Bloomington, on a platform of many specific 45 See a series of articles in the Indiana Journal, Oct. 8, 15, 29, 1845. ^^ Indiana Journal, Jan. 10, 1846. 478 HISTORY OF INDIANA planks, of which "no banks," "no internal improvements," "no State debts," "an ad valorem tariff," "no State loans," "payment of honest debts," "hard money," "no special bank charters," "no connection between state and church," were a few.'*" The campaign was waged on personalities, though, in the history of the State, it would be difficult to point out a campaign in which two cleaner men contended for the office of governor. Whitcomb was attacked most severely for his conduct with reference to his appointments to the su- preme bench, while Marshall was most effectively criticized for his connection with the internal improvement policy.^^ Orth withdrew from the race May 4, and the Whig Central Committee substituted Alexander C. Stevenson of Putnam county in his place. Besides the personalities, the "Butler Bill" was widely discussed. Neither party was able to raise any great amount of enthusiasm. Whitcomb was success- ful over Marshall by 4,037 votes; the Free Soilers under Stevens received 2,278 votes, almost entirely, it seems, at the expense of the Whigs.^^ The congressional elections of 1847 form a prelude to the presidential campaign of 1848. The Mexican War had absorbed practically all of the political energy of the people since the spring of 1846. The Whigs at once attacked the Polk administration for its conduct of the war. Especially had the President laid himself open to hostile criticism by appointing Democrats to the higher positions in the mili- tary service and for attempting to secure votes against the Wilmot Proviso by a skillful use of his appointive power.^*' As a result of their searching criticism the administration was soon thrown on the defensive. In State politics the Whigs had made a fairly creditable 47 Madison Courier, Jan. 17, 1846. Resolutions of the Democratic Editorial Association. 48 For a good statement of the attack on Whitcomb see Indiana Jour- nal, July 1. 1846, and March IS, 1846. For a statement of the charges against Marshall see Journal, May 13, 1846; see also Journal, April 22 and April 29. 49 Indiana Journal, Aug. 26. 1846. 50 Indiana State Journal, Mar. 24, June 9, 1846. POLITICS FROM 1840 TO 1852 479 record during the last four years, while the Democratic organization had suffered from the fights over the "Butler Bills," the senatorial elections, the appointments of su- preme judges, and lastly over the Wilmot Proviso struggle in Congress. 51 Many of the Indiana congressmen were in political trouble with their constituencies. As a result of the Mexi- can War the National Treasury was empty ; so that appro- priations for the improvement of the western rivers, for the continuation of the Cumberland Road, for the harbor at Michigan City could not be made. Several appropria- tion bills for these improvements had been passed by Con- gress in 1845, but had met the veto of the President. The congressional candidates in Indiana, especially in the Ninth District, had argued to their constituents that President Polk would not veto such appropriations voted by Demo- crats. The facts had not borne out their prophecy.^- In the First and Eighth Districts the respective Democratic candidates, Robert Dale Owen and John Petit, were both infidels, for which they were being ruthlessly persecuted by their Whig opponents. Owen was a man of the highest type who gave no occasion for attack, but Petit took pleas- ure in obtruding his religious convictions. For instance, he annually introduced resolutions in Congress to dispense with the chaplain. In the Sixth District there was a three- cornered fight in the Democratic convention. Dr. D. M. Dobson of Owen county, George W. Carr of Lawrence, and John W. Davis of Parke county engaged in a life and death political struggle. Dr. Davis, the only one who could have been elected, withdrew after the third convention had failed to make a nomination. Dr. Dobson was nominated at Bloomfield, July 8. The long fight disgusted the voters and left the party without the organization to make a success- ful contest. In the Seventh District the bitter feud be- tween Senator Hannegan and Joseph A. Wright deprived 51 Platform of the Fifth District, Indiana State Journal, June 23, 1847. 52 Indiana Journal, May 26, 1847. 480 HISTORY OF INDIANA the latter of the united support of the Democrats, so that he was defeated. The results of the election were a disapointment to both parties. The combined vote of the Whigs in all the dis- tricts was 67,723, of the Democrats 67,216. Thus although the Whigs carried the State by a majority of 507, they elected only four of the ten congressmen. Had the Whig majority in the Fourth District, where Caleb B. Smith de- feated Charles Test by a majority of 1,368, been prop- erly distributed, it would have elected five more Whig con- gressmen. On the other hand, George G. Dunn and R. W. Thompson were elected on the Whig tickets in the Sixth and Seventh Districts, respectively, by majorities of 292 and 178. The election was very close, with the Whigs enjoy- ing a moral victory.^^ The Liberty Party does not seem to have made an active canvass. Meetings were held in the districts and the voters aligned themselves with that candidate who gave most promise of carrying out their principles. Their platform opposed admitting any more slave States, the acquisition of any more slave territory, and the further prosecution of the War with Mexico. On these questions they de- manded the views of the candidates and cast their votes accordingly.^^ The opening of the campaign of 1848 found both par- ties in Indiana eager as usual for the contest, but doubtful as to candidates. President Polk had been disqualified by his pro-slavery policy for the race in any of the Northern States. The hostile feeling aroused by the Wilmot Proviso would not be quieted. The course of events thoroughly aroused the anti-slavery Democrats in the North. With- out their support it was impossible to win in Indiana. Of the six Democratic congressmen then representing the State not one had received a majority as high as 500. It was felt by all of them that the pro-slavery program of 53 Indiana State Journal June 29, July 7, Sept. 10, 1847. 54 Indiana State Journal, June 23, 1847. A Whig platform, Ninth District, is given in the Journal, May 26, 1847. POLITICS FROM 1840 TO 1852 481 the Polk administration was jeopardizing their political lives. On the other hand, it was felt just as strongly that it was impossible to carry a Southern State on a platform endorsing the Wilmot Proviso. The defeat of the adminis- tration would throw all the national patronage in the State into the hands of the Whigs, thus endangering all the fed- eral officeholders in the State. It was not the first nor the last time that the elective and appointive federal office- holders of the State found themselves at loggerheads. It is hardly necessary to point out that the appointive office- holders were pro-slavery and the elective anti-slavery, at least in policy. The Democratic press, so far as it was not subsidized by public printing and postoffice appointments, was generally favorable toward the anti-slavery policy. The Whigs were not responsible for any part of the ad- ministration policy in securing new territory for slavery. So long, therefore, as they merely opposed the pro-slavery propaganda of Polk, they held the moral sympathy of the majority of the voters of Indiana. On the other hand, as soon as they faced the problem of a national campaign with its national platform and national candidates, they found themselves in the same predicament as the Democrats. In- diana Whigs were called upon to support a platform and a candidate that could also carry such States as Kentucky and Louisiana. A Whig President could not be elected without the support of many Southern States. There was only one party with a logical program and that was the Liberty Party, then coming to be known as the Free Soil Party. It opposed the further spread of slavery and the further acquisition of slave territory. But having no reasonable hope of electing any of its candidates, it had no strong appeal to the mass of Indiana voters. Un- der these circumstances the contest took on all the fascina- tion of a game of skill. The Whigs of Wayne county met on Christmas day, 1847, and condemned by resolution the annexation of Texas and the War with Mexico, but praised the soldiers who fought the war. They endorsed Taylor for the presi- 482 HISTORY OF INDIANA dency--^-* These resolutions might do very well for Indiana^ but it was plain they would not serve as a platform south of the Ohio. Furthermore there was a slight contradiction apparent between the candidate and the platform. How- ever, it fairly represents the contradictory nature of the campaign in the State. The farther-sighted Whig leaders recognized that the Free Soilers held the balance of power in the State, and that few of them would ever vote for a slave-holder. Judge McLean of Cincinnati seemed on that account the most promising candidate. All agreed that he was not the choice of the Whigs of the State, and could not get the vote of the State in the national convention. This prediction was fairly well carried out. In the national convention McLean failed to receive a vote from Indiana. On the first ballot Scott received 9, Clay 2, Taylor 1. On the fourth and last Scott received 4, Clay 1 and Taylor 7 of the votes of the Indiana delegates. An electoral ticket had already been selected and a central committee of fifteen members, one from each congressional district and five from the Fifth.^^ The Democrats met as usual at Indianapolis, January 8, and laid their plans for the campaign. There were only twenty-one counties represented. Little enthusiasm was manifested. The two parties seemed much alike in that re- gard. Lewis Cass was their favorite for the presidency.^" The Free Soilers were unable to support either of the old parties and therefore organized for a separate cam- paign. Their State convention was held at Indianapolis, July 26. After the usual work had been attended to, they drev/ up a set of resolutions declaring that there was no difference between the old parties on the slavery question ; that they would stand by the constitution, but would oppose the spread of slavery; that they would stand by the plat- form of the Buffalo convention and would support Van Buren; that the Free Soil platform should be a test in 55 Tri-weeMy Journal, Jan. 10, 1847. 56 Tri-weeldy State Journal, April 26, May 3, June 16 and Aug. 2, 1848. 57 Tri-tveekly Journal, Jan. 10, 1848. POLITICS FROM 1840 TO 1852 483 supporting State candidates. Ovid Butler and Rawson Vaile of Wayne county and John B. Seamans of Lafayette were the active members of the State committee.^s The conduct of the campaign was not different from that of 1840 and 1844. Cass clubs and Rough and Ready clubs were organized in all parts of the State. Barbecues and joint discussions were common. The Whigs made a feature of a celebration at Fort Harrison, September 5, the thirty- sixth anniversary of Taylor's brilliant feat of arms there.^*^ Little interest or enthusiasm could be aroused. Taylor was not popular on account of his severe criticism of the Sec- ond Regiment at Buena Vista. Cass was not popular on account of his pro-slavery platform.*^'^ Each party made frantic appeals to the Free Soilers — the Whigs, to quit their party and join the Whig; the Democrats, to stand by Van Buren to the last. The Whigs pointed out to them that it was the defection to Birney that elected Polk. That now every vote for Van Buren helped to fasten slavery in the territories; that Van Buren himself was the original "dough face" and had no principles of his own.^^i The Free Soilers stood to their guns in spite of all appeals and the State vote went to Cass by a plurality of 4,538, Van Buren receiving 8,100 votes. ^'^ Of the 11,402 votes cast above the number in 1844, the Free Soilers had gained 6,000. The fruits of the victory, however, went to the defeated Whigs. The Democrats controlled the General Assembly. A spirited contest at once began for Hannegan's seat in the United States Senate. Governor Whitcomb, Robert Dale Owen, Senator Hannegan and E. M. Chamberlain were the 58 Tri-iveelcly Journal, Aug. 4, 1S4S. 59 Tri-weeklij Journal, Sept. 15, 1848. 60 "Democrats wlio bave nevei* lifted a finger for the party or its principles and whose integrity is doubtful, and who owe all their super- abundant riches to truckling between the parties, are expecting a rain of soup and are holding their dishes high." Editorial in the State Sen- tinel, quoted by Journal, Sept. 29. On the other hand Editor Defrees of the Journal wrote editorially Aug. 4 : "Next Monday is election day and we fear the Whigs are not prepared for it. While our opponents are active and jubilant, you are all asleep." 61 Tri-wceMy Journal, Aug. 30, 1848. 62 Daily Journal, Dec. 4, Dec. 19, 1848. 484 HISTORY OF INDIANA Democratic aspirants. Each was required by the Demo- cratic members to answer the following questions: Has Congress the constitutional power to exclude slavery from the territories so long as they remain a territory? And if such power exists are you in favor of so excluding slavery? These remind one of the propositions which Lincoln, ten years later, put to Judge Douglas, and which the latter feared to answer. All the candidates answered in the af- firmative. They were then asked if they would abide by instructions of the General Assembly, and all assented. They were finally asked if they would go into caucus and abide by the result. Again all answered affirmatively. On the fourth caucus ballot, Whitcomb received 49 votes, Owen 12, Chamberlain 6, Hannegan 10. There were eighty-two of the eighty-seven Democratic members present.*^^ § 96 The Last Struggles of the Whig Party From 1835 to 1852 there was one continuous political campaign in Indiana. Candidates, platforms and politi- cians came and went, but the contest raged without inter- mission. The election of members to the General Assembly took place in August, 1848, the presidential election fol- lowed in November ; the election of a United States senator came before the General Assembly in December ; in January the parties held their State conventions preparatory to elect- ing a governor in August; during April and May congres- sional conventions were held in the districts to select can- didates for the congressional election in August; during May and June candidates for the General Assembly were selected. The active campaign began about June 1, though the gubernatorial candidates frequently took the field as early as May 1.®* The Whig State convention met in Indianapolis, Jan- uary 3. The usual formalities of a convention were car- 63 Daily Journal, Dec. 6, Dec. 15, Dec. 20, 1S4S. 64 See itinerary of J. A. Wright, Madison Courier, May 2, June 2, 1849. It might be added that two State-wide referendums. one on a school question and one on calling a constitutional convention, were be- fore the voters at this time. POLITICS FROM 1840 TO 1852 485 ried out. One of the rules provided that, in voting, each congressional district should cast three votes as determined by all the voters present from that district. A platform was reported by Thomas Bowling of Terre Haute.*^^ Elisha Embree of Princeton, who had defeated Robert Dale Owen for Congress in 1847 in the First District, was nominated for governor, and Thomas S. Stanfield for lieutenant gov- ernor. The Democratic convention met at Indianapolis, Jan- uary 8. There were three candidates for governor — Joseph A. Wright of Parke county, James H. Lane of Lawrence- burg and E. M. Chamberlain of Goshen. An agreement was reached among the supporters of the two first-named candidates by which Wright was nominated for governor and Lane for lieutenant governor.^^ As soon as Judge Embree, who was then in Washington, heard of his nomination, he at once wrote John D. Defrees, State chairman, declining, stating as his reason that he preferred to serve in Congress, and that he had promised his friends in the First District to be their candidate again. The State chairman immediately called a meeting of the State Central Committee, by whom a new convention was ordered. It met May 3, and nominated John A. Matson of Brookville for governor.*^''' The Free Soilers, under the name of the "Free Democ- racy," met at Indianapolis January 20. A strong effort was made to have the convention endorse Judge Embree, but without success. The failure of this, perhaps, deter- mined the latter to withdraw from the Whig ticket. The Free Soilers nominated James H. Cravens of Ripley county to head their ticket, with John W. Wright of Cass county as his lieutenant.*'^ They decided to combine on local tickets with that party which would give them most consideration. In some counties they had run second in 1848, while in many they held the balance of power. They hoped by a ■65 Daily Journal, Jan. 5, 1849. 66 Daily Journal, Jan. 10, 1849. 67 Daily Journal, Mar. 12, April 2, May 4, May 28, 1849. ^^ Daily Journal, Jan. 20 and 31, 1849. (32) 486 HISTORY OF INDIANA skillful use of their votes to secure several seats in the Gen- eral Assembly. In general, they demanded the application of the Wilmot Proviso in organizing new territory. They opposed admitting any more slave States, and they insisted that Congress free itself of guilt by abolishing slavery wherever it had power, especially in the District of Colum- bia.*^'^ The weakness in their campaign was that they were contesting for a State office on a strictly national platform. The same criticism applies with almost equal force to the other parties. The issue of the struggle turned almost entirely on slavery. The Democrats had supported Cass, who, in his Nicholson letter, had favored spreading slavery as much as possible in order to mitigate its evils. Wright dodged the slavery question as far as he could, usually advocating the non-interference doctrine. On State issues, such as popular education, calling a constitutional convention, pro- viding for biennial assemblies, he felt safer. Matson stood squarely by the Wilmot Proviso. He favored a constitu- tional convention, and especially advocated the popular election of judges and postmasters. In general, the Free Soilers fused with the Democrats. In the Fourth District, a Free Soil candidate, George W. Julian, aided by Demo- cratic votes, was elected to Congress. In the election, the "Van Burenites" supported Wright, leaving the Whig can- didate with his normal Whig vote."*^ The feature of the campaign was the strenuous canvass made by Joseph A. Wright. He made over 100 speeches in eighty-one counties, visiting the remotest parts of the State. The average length of each address was two hours. The decisive defeat of the Whigs in 1849 left little life in the party. With only one congressman out of ten, with no senator, with no control in the State government, the political outlook was indeed gloomy for the party in Indi- es Daii^ Journal, June 8, June 11, 1849. 70 The results of the election were : Wright. 76,897 : iSIatson, 66,854 ; Cravens, 2.978. The Whigs lost all the congressmen but one. E. M. Mc- Gaughey. a Whig, defeating Grafton Cookerly in the Seventh. Tri- weekly Journal, Aug. 17, Aug. 24, Aug. 29, 1849. POLITICS FROM 1840 TO 1852 487 ana. It was unable to take any aggressive steps on any question. The constitutional convention and education en- grossed public attention in the State from 1850 till the close of the convention in 1851. By championing both these measures the Democrats were able to strengthen their po- litical hold on the State. In 1850 they elected a safe ma- jority of the assemblymen; in 1851 they elected two-thirds of the assemblymen, and a like proportion of delegates to the constitutional convention. In the latter year, however, the Whigs succeeded in electing two congressmen, Samuel W. Parker in the Fourth, and Samuel Brenton in the Tenth District. The combined Democratic majority in the ten districts, however, was 9,4Qd.'^^ Success to the Democrats was attended with grave dan- ger to the party. The assistance and co-operation of the Free Soilers had been courted ever since 1844. The latter came to feel that they had contributed essentially to the success of the party, and they therefore began boldly to demand a hearing in its councils. The smouldering coals of Free Soilism began to blaze up smartly. There was only need of a little gust of passion to start an uncontrollable fire. The gust was not to come till 1854, but in the mean- time it required all the political acumen and forbearance in the party to keep the flame down. The politicians and perhaps a majority of the rank and file of the old parties welcomed the compromise measures of 1850. The slavery agitation had reached the pitch where it was causing uneasiness to thoughtful men. So willingly did the leaders abandon the question that there appeared to the Abolitionists to be an agreement among them to eliminate it. The election of 1852 was the first under the new con- stitution. For the third time in the State history a guber- natorial and presidential campaign had fallen on the same year.'- Never before had there been so many candidates in the field at once. 71 Indiana Journal, Aug. 30, 1851. 72 Monroe and Jennings were elected in 1S16, but the presidential electors were chosen in the legislature. 488 HISTORY OF INDIANA The Democratic State convention met in Masonic Hall, Indianapolis, February 24, 1852. The party was in good spirits, but there was no excess of enthusiasm. Governor Wright had made many enemies in his own party and many friends in the Whig party by fearlessly opposing the free banks and the liquor interests. No one appeared to con- test the nomination with him. For lieutenant governor, Ashbel P. Williard, an eloquent young lawyer of New Al- bany, was chosen. Besides these there were now ten more State officials to be elected on the State ticket. After these had been selected, the convention endorsed the compromise measures of the recent Congress. This was not done with- out serious protest, voiced by such papers as the Lafayette Courier, the Indianapolis Stateman, the Goshen Democrat, and others of the Free Soil persuasion. The convention emphasized sharply the cleavage be- tween the two wings of the party. The northern part of the State, where Free Soilism was strong, was not repre- sented on the ticket. The Whig State convention assembled at Indianapolis, February 26, 1852. As usual there was plenty of speech- making, but not very much real enthusiasm. There was no avowed candidate, and Nicholas McCarty, a prominent merchant of Indianapolis, was placed at the head of the ticket. William Williams of Warsaw took second place. After filling up the rest of the ticket, principally with men from the northern part of the State, a featureless platform was adopted. In its general attitude the party stood for about the same policy as the Democratic. As popular cam- paigners the Whigs were hopelessly outclassed. Had the Whigs nominated George G. Dunn, R. W. Thompson, or some man of that class, they might have won. On the hustings Joseph A. Wright has had few equals in the State. The Free Soilers held their State convention at Indian- apolis, May 17. Each township in the State was requested to send a delegate. The party was composed of Abolition- ists, Wilmot Proviso Democrats, Van Burenites, and Anti- Fugitive-Slaw-Law Whigs. A. L. Robinson of Vanderburg POLITICS FROM 1840 TO 1852 489 county and J. P. Milliken of Dearborn were the candidates. The new party was bitterly opposed by both old parties, the Democrats having changed their attitude toward it de- cidedly since 1848. The national candidates added no zest to the campaign in the State. Scott failed to elicit any enthusiasm, while Pierce, like Polk in 1844, was an unknown person. The leading Whig papers of Indiana had in a forlorn way sup- ported Scott for the last year, but not in the way they had formerly supported Clay and Harrison. The State campaign lacked all the spectacular elements of 1840, and the earnestness of 1832 or 1844. It was en- tirely machine made. The Free Soilers were not allowed a hearing, and there was no issue between the other parties sufficient to arouse any passion. The usual number of cam- paign speeches, rallies, and barbecues were held. The State election came off October 12. As the results trickled in slowly it became manifest that the Whig Party had met disaster. Only one congressman out of eleven, Samuel Par- ker of the Fifth, had been elected. Wright had defeated McCarty by 18,935 majority, while the third party had polled only 3,303 votes. The returns from the presidential polls were equally discouraging to the Whigs. Pierce had received 95,299 votes, Scott 80,901 and Hale, on the Free Soil ticket, 6,934. The Whigs carried twenty-one counties. They were almost careless of the results and received the reports calmly. They had supported the party, not through belief in its platform or its candidate, but rather through a spirit of opposition to the Democratic Party. The Demo- crats were not elated by their success. The bitter dissen- tions which had been hushed with difficulty during the campaign at once broke out. The campaign was the last in which either the Whig or Free Soil Party entered actively. The Whig Party went to its grave with very few mourners, and they professional. The Free Soilers joined with the liberated Whigs and dis- affected Democrats to form a new party. The old order was dead, the new order had begun. Like the morning sun- 490 HISTORY OF INDIANA shine after a night of storm the State appeared after the campaign of 1852. With a new constitution, with new party affiliations unshackled by professional politicians, with new institutions, and renewed courage, her citizens looked to the future full of hope and assuranceJ^ 73 The facts of this campaign have been talien from the Indianapolis Journal and Sentinel, the Madison Courier and the Logansport Pharos. BIBLIOGRAPHY Albach, James R., Annals of The West. Pittsburg, 1856. Ajlden, George Henry, New Governments West of the Alleghany Moun- tains. Madison. Alerding, Rev. Herman, The Diocese of Vincennes. Alvord, C W., "Gibault aud tjie Submission of Post Vincennes," Amer- ican Historical Review, XIV, 544. Alvord, C. W., Old Kaskaskia Records. Springfield, 1909. This contains many important papers relating to the early Iiistoiy of Vincennes. American Almanac and Repository of Useful Knowledge. Thirty-three vols. Boston, 1830-1862. Statistical. American Archives. This is a collection of papers from the old Con- federation Government and precede the Am. Statp Papers. It con- tains, many valuable papers relating to Western and Indiana History. America/n Historical Register, March, 1896, has an account of Lafay- , ette's visit to the United States in 1824-25, American State Papers, Docmnents Legislative and Executive. 38 vols. Washington, 1832-1861. These consist of papers selected from the archives at Washington, aud printed by the government. They are made up largely of letters and petitions to the government officials. Documentary. Annual Register. An English Magazine. Contemporary. Avery, E. M., History of the United States. Cleveland, 1904-10. Audubon, Maria A., Western Journal, Ed. by Frank H. Hodder. Cleve- land, 1906. Baird, Capt. L. C, "General Lafayette's Visit to Indiana," in Indiana Magazine of History, II, 195. Baker, George A., The St. Josepli-Kankakee Portage. South Bend, 1899. Ball, Timothy H., The Lake of the Red Cedars, Thirty Years in Lake County. Oi'own Point, 1880. Bankers'" Magazine. Nevp York, 1846, to . Banta, D. D., "Early Schools of Indiana," in Indiana Magazine of His- tory. II, 41, 81. Benson, Elbert J., The Wabash Trade Route in the Development of the Old Northioest, Johns Hopkins University Studies. Baltimore. 1903. Benton, Thomas H., Thirty Yea7-s' View 1820-1850. Taken from Con- gressional Debates and Private Papers of Senator Benton. New York, 1856. I- 492 HISTORY OF INDIANA Bishop, Robeet H., An Outline History of the Presbyterian Church in Kentucky, containing the Memoirs of Rev. David Rice. Lexington, 1824. Blanchard, IliiFus. The Discovery and Conquest of the Northwest. Chicago, 1880. This old book has never been so highly appreci- ated as it deserved. Bolton, Nathaniel, Early History of Indianapolis and Central Indiana, Pub. of Ind. Hist. Society, I, No. 5. Boone, R. G., History of Education in Indiana. Boyd, Carl Evans, "The Clarksville Conventions, 1785, 1787." Documents printetl in American Historical Review, II, 691. BouqueVs Expedition Against the Ohio Indians, Cincinnati, 1868. Bbackeneidge, H. M., History of the Late War Between the United States and Great Britain. Philadelphia, 1836. Beige, Wallace, History of Fort Wayne. Fort Wayne, 1868. Beown. Ignatius, Indianapolis Directory, 1868-9. Indianapolis, 1868. The Introduction contains a valuable History of Indianapolis. BuENET, Jacob, Islotes on the Early Settlement of the ^Northwestern Territory. Cincinnati, 1847. Valuable. BuTLEE, Mann, History of Kentucky. Louisville, 1834. BuTTEEFiELD, CONSUL W., Histovy of the G-irtys. Cleveland, 1898. This is a scholarly work and the most reliable on the Indian Wars of the period. Caeteb, Clabence E., Great Britain and the Illinois Country. Washing- ton, 1910. Catteeall, Ralph. The Second Bank of the Vmted States. Chicago, 1903. Census Reports of the U. S. These are taken every decade and furnish the historian a vast amount of data. Charter of the State Bank of Indiana and the By-Laws of the Di- rectors. Indianapolis, 1841. Chase, S. P. (ed.) Statutes of Ohio and the Northwestern Territory, 1833. The introduction contains much valuable History concern- ing the Northwest Territory. Clark, George Rogers, Papers, edited by James A. James, 1912. These are the best source for the conquest of the Northwest. Clark, Geace Julian, "George W. Julian, Some Impressions," in In- diana Magazine of History, II, 57. Claek, M. St. Clair, and Hall, D. A., Legislative and Documentary His- tory of the Bank of the United States, including the Bank of North America. Washington, 1832. Cleland, P. S., A Quarter Century Discourse delivered at Greenicood, 1804. Indianapolis, 1865. Cleland, Rev. Thomas H., Memoirs of Thomas Cleland, D. D. Cincin- nati, 1859. CocKEUM, Col. William, Pioneer History of Indiana. Oakland City, Ind., 1907. An excellent book containing many documents of great value. Coffin, Levi, Reminiscences. Cincinnati, 1880. Coleman, C. B., "Some Religious Developments in Indiana," in Indiana Magazine of History, V, 57. BIBLIOGRAPHY 493 Coleman, Robeet E., "Simon Kenton," in Harper's Magazine, XXVIII, 289. CoMSTOCK, Howard Payne, "History of Canals in Indiana," in Indiana Magazine of History, VII, 1. Congress, Annals of. 42 vols. Washington, 1834-1856. Congressional Debates. 29 vols. Washington, 1S25-1S37. Congressional Globe. 108 vols. Washington, 1834-1873. CoNANT, Charles A., A History of Moder-n Banks of Issue. Fourth Edition. New York, 1909. This has a chapter on State Banks. CooLEY, T. M., State Bank Issues in Michigan. In the publications of the Michigan Political Science Association. Ann Arbor. Cottman, George S., "Internal Improvements in Indiana," in Indiana Magazine of History, III, 101, 117, 148. Cottman, George S., "William H. Churchman and the School for the Blind," in Indiana Magazine of History, X, 77. Cottman, George S., "The Wabash and Its Valley," in Indiana Magazine of History, I, 59, 123 ; "Early Commerce in Indiana," in IV, 1. County Histories. For a list of these see Indiana Magazine of History, VI, 43. They are extremely valuable for State History, but, of course, must be used with care. Court Records. Use has been made of the records of the county courts at Vincennes and of the Supreme Court at Indianapolis. These records go back to 1790. No doubt additional information on the history of the state could have been had from other counties. Too little use is being made of this source of history. Cox, Sanford, Recollections of an Old Settler. Lafayette, 1860. A valuable memoir. Ceaig, Oscar J., Ouiatanon, lud. Hist. Soc. Publications II. No. 8. Ceoghan, George, Letters and Journals Relating to Tours into the Western Country, 1750-1765, in Early Western Travels, I, 53. Cross, Percy, Guerrilla Leaders of the World. CuLLEY, D. v., in Lawrenceburg Palladium, May 15, 1830, has a good accoimt of the Lochry Massacre. Cuming, Fortesque, Sketch of a Tour to the Western Country, 1807- 1809, in Early Westo'n Travels, IV. 1. Cutler, Manasseh, Life, Journal and Correspondence of, edited by W. P. and J. P. Cutler. Cincinnati, 1888. Dawson, Moses, Life of Harrison. Cincinnati, 1834. This is the best biography of Harrison and contains much important documentary material. It was prepared under the direction of Harrison him- self. De Bow's Review. A Southern and Western Business Directory, 1845- 1868. New Orleans. Dickey, John M., Brief History of the Presbyterian Church in the State of Indiana, Madison, 1828. The author was the "father" of the church in Indiana. DiLLENBAUGH, Feederick S., Breaking the Wilderness. New York, 1905. A good general discussion of pioneering. Dillon, Jno. B., History of Indiana to 1816, Indianapolis, 1859. The period from 1816 to 1859 is covered in twelve pages. It is scholarly and accurate. A short sighted legislature preventing him finishing his work and also fi'om giving us a state library to be proud of. 494 HISTORY OF INDIANA Dillon, Jno B., The National Decline of the Miami Indians, Ind. Hist. Soc. Publications, I, No. 4. Documents Relatiny to the Colonial History of 'New York, State Publi- cations. DoDD. W. F., The Revision and Amendment of State Constitutions, Balti- more, 1910. Donaldson, Thomas, The Public Domain, Washington. Documentary. Drake, Samuel G., Life of Teeumseh. DuDEN, Margaret, "Internal Improvements in Indiana, 1818-1846," in Indiana Magazine of History, V, 160. Duncan, H. C, "Austin Seward" (a pioneer of Monroe county), in Indiana Magazine of History, IV, 103. Dunn, J. P., Jr.,, Indiana, A Redemption from Slavery. Boston, 1888. Dunn. Jacob P., Jr., French Settlements on the Wabash, Ind. Hist. Soc. Publications, II, No. 11. Dunn. Jacob P., Jr.. The Mission to the Wabash, Ind. Hist. Soc. Publi- cations, III, No. 4. Dunn, Jacob P., Jr.. True Indian Stories. Indianapolis, 1908. Edson, Hanford a.. Contributions to the Early History of the Presby- terian Church in Indiana, Indianapolis, 1898. Accurate and full of details. English, William H., The Conquest of the Country Northwest of the River Ohio, Indianapolis, 1896. This is the fullest and best ac- count of Clark's Campaign. Esaret, Logan, Internal Improvements in Early Indiana, Ind. Hist. Soc. Publications, V, No. 2, 1912. Esarey, Logan, State BanMng in Early Indiana, Indiana University Studies. Bloomington, 1912. Esarey, Logan, "Vincennes' First City Government," in Indiana Maga- zine of History, V, 1 ; documentary. Evans. Madison, Biographical Sketches of the Pioneer Preachers of Indiana, Philadelphia, 1862. Contains a good sketch of the Northwestern Christian University. Executive Journal of Indiana Territory, edited by W. W. Woollen, Daniel Waite Howe and J. P. Dunn, Jr., Ind. Hist. Soc. Publi- cations, II, No. 3. Faux, W., Journal of a Tour Through the United States, 1823. He crossed southern Indiana, visiting, especially, Vincennes, Prince- ton and New Harmony. Fergus Historical Series. No. 34, contains the Papers of Philip de Rocheblave, who was captured at Kaskaskia. No. 35 contains the Record Book and Papers of John Todd. Ferris, Dr. Ezra, The Early Settlement of the Miami Country, Ind. Hist. Soc. Publications, I, No. 9. Finley, J. B., Life Among the Indians. "Fletcher Papers," Early Indianapolis, in Indiana Magazine of History, II, 29. 73. 127, 187, also in Indianapolis News, 1879. Flint, James, Letters from America, 1818-1820, in Early Western Travels, IX, I. Flint spent some weeks at Jeffersouville. FoRDHAM, Elias, Pym, Personal Narrative of Travels in Virginia and the West, edited by F. A. Ogg. Cleveland, 1905. BIBLIOGRAPHY 495 Gallatin, Albert, Writings. 3 vols. Philadelphia, 1879, vol. Ill, is of especial imix)i'tance. Gaenett, Chables Huntee, State Banks of Issue in Illinois, University of Illinois, 1898. Gazetteer of Indiana, 1833. Indianapolis. Small voliune of statistical and descriptive information. Gazetteer of Indiana, 1849, third edition. Indianapolis. Edited by E. M. Chamberlain. Gentleman's Magazine. An English contemporary magazine. Goodrich and Tttttle, A History of the State of Indiana, 1875. Of slight value. Goodwin, Frank P., ''Rise of Manufactures in the Miami Country," in American Historical Review, XII, 761. Griffith, Appleton Prentiss Clark, A Bibliography of the First and Second Banks of the United States, Washington, 1908. Gouge, William M., Short History of Paper Money and Banking in the United States. Philadelphia, 1833. This is a good contemporary discussion of the principles and practice of banking. Hall, Baynard R., The New Purchase. New York, 1843. 2 vols. A second edition was published in one volume at New Albany, 1855. This is a good literary picture of pioneer times in Indiana. Hall, James, Sketches of History, Life and Manners in the West, Cin- cinnati, 1834. 3 vols. Haldiman Papers in the Canadian Archives at Ottawa. These contain the British Official Papers concerning the Revolutionary War in the West. Haeding, William F., "The State Bank of Indiana, 1834 to 1859" ; in the Journal of Political Economy, December, 1895, University of Chi- cago. This is an excellent study of the bank from an economic standpoint. Harrison, William Henry, Aborigines of the Ohio Valley. Hawoeth, Paul L., "Folk Speech in Indiana," in Indiana Magazine of History, I, 163. Heitman, Francis Bernard, Historical Register of the Officers of the Continental Army. Washington, 1903. Hen/ing's Statutes of Virginia, These contain the laws of Virginia that pertain to Illinois county. Henry, William Wirt, Life Correspondence and Speeches of Patrick Henry, New York, 1891. Contains correspondence between CW. Clark and Gov. Henry. Henry, W. E., State Platforms of the Two Dominant Political Parties of Indiana, 1850-1900. Indianapolis, 1902. Hildreth, S. p.. Pioneer History, etc. Cincinnati, 1848. Historical Atlas of Indiana, illustrated. Baskin, Forster & Co., 1876. A very superior work, accurate and reliable. History of the Late War by an American, Baltimore, 1816. A fairly good account of the War of 1812 by an eyewitness of many of its events. Pro-American. Holliday, F. C, Indiana Methodism, Cincinnati, 1873. Contains good accounts of the Methodist colleges. Holliday, Rev. F. C, Life and Times of the Rev. Allen C. Wiley, 1853. 496 HISTORY OF INDIANA HoLLowAY, W. R., Indianapolis; A Historical and Statistical Sketch of the Railroad City, Indianapolis, 1870. HovEY, Horace C, "The Origin of tlie Presbyterian Cliurcli in New Albany," in New Albany Ledger, Nov. 25, 1867. Howard, George E., An Introduction to the Local Constitutional History of the United States, Baltimore, 1889. This has a reputation un- warranted by its accuracy. Howe, Daniel Waite, The Laios and Courts of Northwest and Indiana Territories, Ind. Hist. Soc. Publications, II, No. 1. HuLBERT, Abcheb Butler, Historic HighiDuys, vol 8. Contains sketches of Clark's, St. Clair's and Wayne's routes, Cleveland, 1904. Humphrey, Edward P., and Cleland, Thomas H., Memoirs of the Rev. Thomas Cleland, compiled from his private papers, Cincinnati, 1859. Hunt's Merchants Magazine, 1839 to 1860. New York. Indiana Alumni Quarterly, edited by Dr. S. B. Harding. Bloomington, 1913. Indiana Magazine of History. Indianapolis and Bloomington, 1905. Indiana State Publications, Official Reports. No attempt has been made to make a bibliography of these. Taken as a whole they form the most valuable source of State History. At present they are not easily accessible to students or writers of history. As indicated by footnotes, they have been used continuously by the writer. They need to be published in order, and indexed, before they can be used to advantage. Jesuit Relations, edited by R. G. Thwaites, in 73 volumes. Cleveland, 1896. Johnson, James H., A Ministry of Forty Years in Indiana. Indianapolis, 1865. Kaskaskia Records, Illinois Hist. Collections, V. Kemper, Dr. G. W. H., A Medical History of Indiana, Chicago, 1911. Ketcham, John, Reminiscenees of Early Life About Vallonia, 1812, Bloomington, 1865. Read at his funeral. Lanier, J. F. D., Sketch of the Life of J. F. D. Lanier. New York, 1874. The author was president of the Madison Branch Bank. He gives us an insight into the policy of the bank, by one who stood high in its councils. Lasselle, Charles B., "The Old Indian Traders of Indiana," in In- diana Magazine of History, II, 1. Law, John, The Colonial History of Vincennes, etc. Vinceunes, 1858. Laws. Under this title are included (1) The Laws of the Northwest Territory from 1788 to 1800; (2) The Laws of the Governor and Judges of Indiana Territory from 1800 to 1805; (3) The Laws of Indiana Territory from 1805 to 1815; (4) The Laws of Indiana to date. These were printed for the State by the different public printers. Complete sets can be found in the Law Library at In- dianapolis. The investigator must exercise both patience and discretion in their use. The names, dates and indexes are in- accurate, and one who relies upon them will be misled. lu many BIBLIOGRAPHY 497 cases local and general laws are printed separately, no fixed rule being followed in the division. Lazenby, John C, "Jackson County Prior to 1850," in Indiana Maga- zine of History, X, 256. Legislative Records. Under this title are included three series of volumes : (1) The Journal of the House of Representatives; (2) The Jour- nal of the Senate; (3) The Documentai-y Journal. These were printed for the State by the public printer. Complete sets are to be found in the State Library at Indianapolis. Of the first two there is usually one volume each for each session of the Legisla- ture. The third begins with 1836 and there is usually one volume for each year. The same caution must be used with these as was suggested in the use of the Laws. The dates on the back, the numbers, the pagination and the indexes are unreliable. The only way to be sure a thing is not in one of these volumes is to look it through. The House and Senate Journals contain the minutes of the sessions of those bodies, but beyond that no fixed rule of publication has been followed. The substance of a speech is sometimes given, and many valuable committee reports are in- cluded. The Journals usually contain the Governor's message, and until the beginning of the Documentary Journal, in 1886, they contain all the reports from the State officers that were made to the Legislature. The Documentary Journal contains the committee reports, the official reports, the reports of special investigation, and other valuable papers. In this Journal are found the annual re- ports of the banks as well as many special reports called for from time to time by the Legislature. The long and detailed report on the bank by Nathan Palmer, in 1842, and the report of the Senate committee that investigated the "Bank Frauds," in 1857, are in this Journal also. Taken as a whole, the volmnes contain a vast amount of historical material. Leonard, Adam Ahi, Personal Politics in Indiana, 1816 to 1840. MSS. Leveeing, Julia Henderson, Historic Indiana, New York, 1909. LocKwooD, George B., The New Harmony Movement. New York, 1905. Lossing, Benson J., Pictorial Field Book of the War of 1812. New York, 1869. Excellent. Lossing, Benson J., "Scenes in the War of 1812." A series of articles in Harper's Magazine, vols. XXVI, XXVII, XXVIII. Lyon & Bartlett, LaSalle in the Valley of the St. Joseph, South Bend, 1899. Mallet, Edward, Sieur de Vincennes, the Founder of Indiana's Oldest Town, Indiana Hist. Soc. Publications, III, 2. Manuscript copies of letters written by Nathaniel Ewing and others of the Vincennes Bank to Secretary Crawford are in the ofiice of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Crawford county, Illinois. Printed copies of these letters may be found in American State Papers, Finance, vols. IV and V. Marshall, Humphrey, History of Kentucky. Louis^alle, 1812. Martindale, Charles, Loughery's Defeat and the Pigeon Roost Massa- cre, Ind. Hist. Soc. Publications, II, No. 1. 498 HISTORY OF INDIANA Mathes, Rev. J as. M., Life of Elijah Goodwin. St. Louis, 1880. Ex- cellent. Mathes, Rev. J. M., Tlie Christian Record, 1S43-1S5S. Bloomiugton. Maximilian, Prince of Weid, Travels in the Interior of Noi'th America, in Early Western Travels, vols. XII, XIII, XIV. He was on the lower Wabash and Ohio. McCarer, AV. H., Remembrance of Past Days. Evansville, 1860. McOarty, Carlos T., "Hindostan, a Pioneer Town," in Indiana Magazine of History, X, No. 2. McCoy, Isaac, History of Bo/ptist Indian Missions. Washington, 1840. This is autobiographical and valuable on the condition of Indiana Indians from 1815 to 1830. McClung, John Alexander, Sketches of Western Adventures, etc., edited by H. Waller, Covington, 1872. McCtTLLOCH, Hugh, Men and Measures of Half a Century. New York, 1889. The author was cashier of the Fort Wayne Branch of the State Bank, and President of the Bank of the State of Indiana. No one understood the banking business before the Civil War better than he. McDonald. Daniel, Address in House of Representatives, Indianapolis, February 3, 1905, on bill to erect a monument to Pottawattomie Indians at Twin Lakes, Marshall county. Pub. by direction of House of Representatives. McDonald, Daniel, Removal of the Pottawattomie Indians from North- ern Indiana. Plymouth, 1899. McDonald, Daniel, A History of Freemasonry in Indiana. Indianapolis, 1898. McMaster, John Bach, A History of the People of the United States. New York, 1896. MiCHATJX, F. A., Travels to the West of the Alleghany Mountains in 1802, in Early Western Travels, III, 110. MiCHAux, Andre, Journal, 1793-1796, Down the Ohio in Early Western Travels, III, 1. Michigan Historical and Pioneer Collections, 38 vols. Lansing. {_,, Miller, Marguerite, Home Folks, Stories of Old Settlers of Fulton County, 2 vols. Rochester. Mitchell, Prof. Waldo F., "Indiana's Growth, 1812-1820," in Indiana Magazine of History, X, 369. Morgan, Lewis H., League of the Iroquois. New York, 1904. Moore, Charles, The Northwest Under Three Flags. New York, 1900. A good, brief account of the early history of the Old Northwest. Moore, A. Y., History of Hanover College. Indianapolis, 1900. Morris, Bethuel F., Review of Ten Years' Service With Main Street Presbyterian Church at Rising Sun, 1844 to 1854. National Monetary Commission Publications. The following have been especially valuable : Dewey, Davis R.. State Banking Before the Civil War, and Holdworth, John Thom., The First and Second United States Bank. . Naylor, Judge Isaac, "The Battle of Tippecanoe," in Indiana Magazine of History, II, 163. Niles' Weekly Register, 73 vols, Baltimore, 1811-1848, BIBLIOGRAPHY 499 Newspapers. A large part of the history of Indiana must of necessity be written from Newspaper sources. When it is possible to use several files covering the same period it is relatively easy by com- paring to ascertain the facts. Many files have been used con- tinually but the following are mentioned as most important for this period: Vincennes Western Sun, 1807 to the present. Indianapolis Journal, 1825 to 19(M. IndianaiK)lis Democrat and Sentinel, 1823 to 1904. Madison Courier, 1837 to present. Logansi5ort Pharos and the Logansport Telegraph. Lawrenceburg Palladium and the Vincennes Centinel. Usually references have been made to a single file but it is not difficult to find any current event in a newspaper file if the date is kept in mind. NowLAND, J. H. B., Early Reminiscences of Indianapolis, 1870, and Prominent Men of Indianapolis, 1877. Oglesbee, Rolla B., History of Michigan City. Pabkee, Benjamin S., "Pioneer Lrife," in Indiana Magazine of History, III, 1, 51, 125, 182. Pabkman, Francis, The Jesuits in America, Boston, 1897; LaSalle and the Discovery of the Great West, Boston, 1897 ; The Conspiracy of Pontiac, 2 vols., Boston, 1897. Parsons, Samuel Holden, Life and Letters of, edited by C. S. Hall. Binghamton, 1904. Parsons was one of the first judges of the Northwest Territory and lost his life by drowning while on circuit. Perkins and Peck, Annals of the West (Same as Albach's). Pershing, M. W., Life of General John Tipton and Early Indiana History, Tipton. Pirtle, Capt. Alfred, Battle of Tippecanoe, Filson Club Papers, No. 15, Louisville, 1900. PiBTLE, Henry, Clark's Campaign in the Illinois. Cincinnati, 1864. Documentary. Pitkin, Timothy, A Statistical Account of the Com/merce of the United States. New Haven, 1835. PiTTMAN, Capt. Philip, Present State of Settlements on the Mississippi, edited by Frank H. Hodder. Cleveland, 1906. PoLKE, James, "Memoirs," in Indiana Magazine of History, X, 83. PooRE, Ben Perley, Constitutions of the United States and the States, Washington, 1878. Post, M. M., A Retrospect After Thirty Years' Ministry at Logansport, 1860. Potter, Rev. L. D., "Early History of Presbyterianism in the White- water Valley," in the Indiana Magazine of History, V, 28. QuAiFE, MiLO, Chicago and the Old Northwest. Rawles, W. a.. Centralizing Tendencies in the Administration of In- diana, New York, 1903. A most scolarly and valuable work. 500 HISTORY OF INDIANA •» Reed, Rev. Isaac, The Christian Traveler, in five parts, including Nine Years and Eighteen Thousand Miles. New York, 1828. Reed was one of the first preachers in the Xew Purchase. Reed, Rev. Isaac, Youth's Book. Indianapolis, 1840. Family gossip about homelife in the New Purchase. Reid, Nina K., "James Noble," "Waller Taylor." "John Tipton" and "William Hendricks," in Indiana Magazine of History, IX. Report of the Committee on Banking. House Reports, 22d Congress, first Session, April, 1832. Report of the Debates of the Convention for the Revision of the Con- stitution of Indiana. H. Fowler, official reporter, Indianapolis. 1850. Reports. In addition to the printed reports found in the Legislative Journals, many of the original manuscript reports, by State officials, are on file in the State Library. They include many details not contained in the printed form. They have been used in checking up the printed reports but no reference has been made to them in the notes. Robertson, Robert S.. Valley of the Upper Maumee. 2 vols. Madison, 1889. Roosevelt, Theodore, The Winning of the West. New York, 1889. This is a very readable popular account and fairly accurate. Sabine, Lorenzo, Loyalists of the American Revolution. Boston, 1874. Safford, William H., The Blennerhassett Papers. Cincinnati, 1861. Sargent, Winthrop, Diary, etc., 1793. Schoolcraft, Henry R., The Indian Tribes of the United States. (^^Searight, Thomas B., The Old Pike, a History of the National Road. Washington, 1894. Secret Journals of Congress. These give the transactions with the Indians and Spaniards in the West during the Revolution. Shea, John Gilmary, Life of Archbishop Carroll. Gives some data con- cerning the early history of Vincennes. Shea, John Gilmary, Discovery and Exploration of the Mississippi. Shockley, Dr. E. V., "County Seats and County Seats Wars," in Indi- ana Magazine of History. X. 1. / ^,^Siebert, W. H., "Light on the Underground Railroad," in the American ^ Historical Review, I, 456; also published separately. New York, 1898. Slocum, Charles E., The Ohio Country, 1783-1815. New York, 1910. Deals largely with the Indian wars. Slocum, Charles E., History of the Maumee River Basin, Indianapolis, 1905. Smith, Oliver H., Trials and Sketches. Cincinnati, 1858. Senator Smith was personally acquainted with most of the public men of the period, and his gossipy sketches give the reader a personal ac- quaintance with them. Smith, Rev. J. C, Reminiscences of Early Methodism in Indiana, In- dianapolis, 1879. Smith, John L., Indiana Methodism, Valparaiso, 1892. An interesting, gossipy volume. Excellent for the life of the period. BIBLIOGRAPHY 501 Smith, Theodore Clabke, The Liberty and Free Soil Parties in the Northwest, Harvard Historical Studies, vol. 4, New York, 1907. Smith, William Heney, History of the State of Indiana from the Earliest Explorations to the Present Time. Indianapolis, 1897, 2 vols. Has some good material but on the whole is not reliable. Spaulding, M. J., Sketches of the Early Catholic Missions of Kentucky, etc., 1787 to 1826. Louisville. Spaeks, Jared, Life of Anthony Wayne. New York, 1872. Statutes at Large of Chreat Britain. These contain the English laws that pertain to the government of the Illinois country. St. Clair Papers, edited by William Henry Smith. Cincinnati, 1882. This is an invaluable source on the Northwest Ten-itory, 1788 to 1800. Stewart, De. James H., Recollections of the Early Settlement of the Waiash Valley and Carroll County. Cincinnati, 1873. Excellent. Stickey, Ida Stearns, Civil Studies of Indianapolis. Early history of the city. Stott, Dr. Wm. T., Indiana Baptist History, 1908. This book has not circulated as widely as it should. Strickland, W. P., AutoMography of Peter Cartwright, the Backwoods Preacher. New York, 1856. Strickland, W. P., Pioneers of the West, New York. Strickland, W. P., Sketches of Western Methodism, New York, 1856. Sulgrove, B. R., History of Indianapolis and Marion County, Phila- delphia, 1884. Sweet, Prof. W. W., "Early Methodist Circuits in Indiana," in Indiana Magazine of History, X, 359. Thomas, John Hardin, "The Academies of Indiana," in Indiana Maga- zine of History, X, 331. Thompson, Col. R. W., Fallen Heroes of Methodism. Thorpe, Francis N., Constitutions and Charters, a new edition of Poore's Charters, etc. Washington, 1909. Thwaites, Reuben Gold, editor, Jesuit Relations. Thwaites, R. G., Early Western Travels, a series of reprints, 1748-1846, Cleveland, 1904. ^ Thwaites and Kellogg, Revolution on the Upper Ohio. Thwaites, R. G., Chronicles of Border Warfare, Cincinnati, 1895. This was written by Alexander Scott Withers. Tipton, John, "Journal," in Indiana Magazine of History, I, 9, 74, II, 170. Todd, C. S., Civil and Military Services of W. H. Harrison, Cincinnati, 1874. Trafton, Rev. Mark, Scenes of My Life, 1878. Treat, Payson J., The National Land System, 1785-1820. New York, 1910. Trusty, Henry Clay, "Formation of the Christian Church in Indiana," in Indiana Magazine of History, VI, 17. 'Tucker, George, The Theory of Money and Banking Investigated, Bos- ton, 1839. Turner, F. J., "Colonization of the West," in American Historical Re- view, XI, 303. (33) 502 HISTORY OF INDIANA TuBNEE, F. J., "Tlie Policy of France Toward the Mississippi Valley in the Administrations of Washington and Adams," in American Historical Revieio, X, 249-280. United States Statutes at Large, Boston, 1848, vol. VII, contains the Indian Treaties from 1789 to 1845. VOGEL, William, "Home Life in Early Indiana," in Indiana Magazine of History, X. VoLNEY, CbNSTANTiNE Feancois, View of the CUmate and Soil of the United States, London, 1804. Wallace, Gen. Lew, An Autobiography, New York, 2 vols. Washington's Works, edited by Paul Leicester Ford, contains the cor- respondence with Clark concerning the attempt on Detroit. Webstee, Homeb J., William Henry Harrison's Administration of In- diana Territory, Indiana Hist. Soc. Publications, IV, No. 3^ White, Hoeace, Money and Banking Illustrated by American History, Boston and London, 1902. Williams, Jesse L., "Population and Productions of Indiana in 1840," in Hunt's Merchants' Magazine, IV, 473. The author was a United States marshal at the time. Wiluams, Lobing a., Publication of Old Settlers and Historical As- sociation of Lake County, Crown Point. Williams, Jesse L., Historical Sketch of the First Presbyterian Chur&h of Fort Wayne. Fort Wayne, 1881. WiNSOE, Justin, From Cartier to Frontenac, Boston, 1894. WiNSOE, Justin, 'Narrative and Critical History of America, 8 vols., Boston. WiNSOE, Justin, The Mississippi Basin, Boston, 1895. WooDBUEN, James A., Higher Education in Indiana, Washington, 1891. Weight, W. Swift, Pastime Sketches, consists largely of papers read before the Logansport Historical Society. INDEX Abbott, Lieut. Gov., commands Vin- cennes, 45. Agricultural Societies, early, 288. Aix la Cbapelle, Treaty of, 28. Allen, John, 239. Allouez, Claude, 3; at Green Bay, 11. "American," steamer, 267. Andersontown, 183. Anderson, Baily, 206. ' Anderson, Captain, an Indian chief, 231. Ange, St., governs Illinois, 40, 45. Anti-Gambling Society, 287. Anti-Masons, 306. Asbury University, 292. Ashworth, Moses, 281. Assenisipia, 128. Associations, Baptist, 282, 283. Astor, John Jacob, 384. Attica, founded, 240, 276. Aubbeenaubee, 334. Austin, Moses, 438. t Bad Axe, 331. ■Badollet, John, 136, 342. Baen, W. C, killed, 189. Bailey, John, 55. Baird, Samuel, 137. Baird, Thomas D., 319. Ballard's Bluff, 360. Banks, free, 408; law for, 410; I)olicy, 410. Bank, First State, 233-236 ; branches, 234; broke, 235. Bank, Second State, chartering, 394 ; five plans, 395 ; branches, 397 ; capital, 398; organization, 399; policy, 400; panic of, 1837, 403; suspended, 404; aids to war, 443. Bank of Indiana, Third State, 413; frauds in its charter, 414; branches, 415, 416. Bfiptist Church, early, 282-283. Barbour, Colonel, 196. Barnett, James, 275. Barron, Joseph, messenger, 184. Bartholomew, Joseph, woimded, 189; ranger, 200-201, 223. Bartholomew county, settled, 248. Bassett, Horace, 259. Battleground convention, 321. Beard, John, 319. Beaubois, Nicholas Ignace de, 19. Beckes, B. V., 331. Beecher, Henry Ward, 431. Beers, P., stage owner, 261. Bees, wild, 424. Benack, 334. Bennett, William H., 319. Berry, Thomas, 189. Bible Society, American, 286. Biddle, Horace P., 456. Biddle, Nick, 307. Big Bottoms, Massacre at. 111. "Big Flat Woods," 241. Big Miami, 154. Bigger, James, ranger, 200. Bigger, Samuel, 319, 321, 322, 470. Biggs, William, 170. Birch Creek, 390 ; mob at, 391. Bird, Henry, Indian partisan, 48; leads an Indian army into Ken- tucky, 80. Birney, James G., 475. Bissell, Lieutenant, 331. "Bitters," 433. Blackbird, 191. Blackford, Isaac, 303. Black Hawk, 328, 329. Black Hawk's War, 325. Blair, James, 319. Blake, Thomas H., 223, 336. Blannerhassett, Herman, 178. Blind, asylum for, 436-437. Blockhouses, on the frontier, 190, 198; in Daviess county, 207. "Bloody 300," 33L Bloomington, settled, 241. Blue Jacket, Shawnee chief, 106, 124. Blue Licks, 87. Blue River, 159. Blythe, B. I., 266. Bond, Shadrack, 169. Boone, Mose, 205. Boone, Ratliff, 206, 309. Boone, Squire, 205. Booneville, founded, 207. 504 INDEX Bosseron, Francis, 67, 97, 134. Botanic Physicians, 434. Bouquet, Henry, invades Indian country, 36. Bowles, W. A., 447. Bowman, Jolin, invades Indian country, 79. Bowman, Josepli, joins Clarli, 49; captures Caliokia, 55. Boyd, Jolin P., 186. Boyd's Fort, 210. Bradstreet, Jolm, invades Indian country, 35. Brady, Henry, 312. Brant, Joseph, 85. "British Band." 326. Bright, Michael G., 376, 385, 456. Broad Ripple, 370. Brodhead, Daniel, Commands at Pittsburg, 84. Brooks, James, 321. Brookville, 199; land office at, 343. Brouilette, Michael, 184. Brute, Gabriel. 279. Bryant's Station, 87. Buckingham. Ebenezer, 340. Buckongahelas, 124. Bueua Vista, battle at, 446. Bullitt's Lick, 108. Buntin, Robert. 136. Burks, James, 252. Burnet, Jacob, trip to Vincennes, 143. Burnett, Governor of New York, 28. Burr conspiracy, 178-179. Burr, David, 357. Bush, George, 276. Busroe. Settlement. 280. Butler, Charles, 380. Butler, Ovid, 483. Butler, Richard, aid to St. Clair, 116. Butler, Richard, Indian Commis- sioner, 92, 93. Butler Bill, first, 382; second, 383. Cadillac, La Motte, 9. Caldwell, William, 86. Calomel doctors. 434. Camp Clark, 441, 443, 449. Campaign of 1844, 446 ; of 1852, 484. Campbell, Alexander, 286. Campbell, John B., 197-198, Campbell. Thomas, 206. Canal board, 357 note; 366. Canal, Ohio Falls, 236. 237. Canby, Israel, 308, 311, 349. Capital, removal of, 210. Captain Jonny, 124. Carr, John, 204, 305. Carlton, Sir Guy, policy in West, 103. Carr, George W., 450, 479. Carr, Samuel, 316. Cartwright, Peter, 280, 281. Cass, Lewis, 202, 360, 473, 482. Catholic, 279, 280. Cedar Lake, 275. Celoron, Bienville de, 16 ; on Ohio, 28. Celoron, Pierre Joseph, Indian par- tisan, 55. Census of 1810. 179, 180, 210; of 1816. 215 ; of 1830, 277, note. Central Canal, 364, 369, 376. Chamberlain, E. M., 483. 485. Chambers, Benjamin. 170, 204. Chapman, Jacob Page, 456, 477. Charities, State, 435. Cherokees, 94. Chersonesus, 128. Chicago, 190, 191. Chickasaws, 20. Chipkawke, 22. Chippewas, 328. Christian Church, 285, 286. Christmas, 430. Churches, early. 279-287. Churchman, William H.. 436. Circuits, judicial, 141, 146; Metho- dist. 280, 281. Cincinnati, legislature at, 149. "Cincinnati," 444. Clark, George Rogers, 48-67; dual instructions, 49; at Louisville, 50; takes Kaskaskia, 51; captures Vincennes, 59-67 ; plans for cap- ture of Detroit, 78; builds Fort Jefferson, 80; expedition to Old Chillicothe. 81; last attempt on Detroit. 84 ; raids Miami towns, 87. 93; ordered to Vincennes, 95; army mutinies, 96; grant confirm- ed, 127. Clark, Marston G., 239, 316. Clark, Othniel, 408. Clark, William, 167. Clark, William, a justice, 131. "Clark's Grant." 69; settler on, 94; 203. Clark county, boundaries, 157, 159, 203. Clarksville, 131, 203. Clay, Henry, 251; writes Anti-Ma- sons. 306, 314, 315; at Indian- apolis, 470. INDEX 505 Clay-Adams, Party, 300. "Classification," 367. Cleariug, 425. Clelaud, Thomas, 283. aeudenniu, John G., 316, 366. Clinton, laid out, 240. Clothing of pioneers, 423. Coe, Isaac, 287. Colfax, Schuyler, 456. "Collar" press. 315. Collings, William, 193. Colonization Society, Indiana, 287. Columbus, laid out, 243. Combs, Michael, 286. Commerce in 1810, 180 ; in 1830, 400 ; with New Orleans, 246. Committee of General Correspond- ence, 299. Common Pleas, 146. Commons, at Vincennes, law for, 150. Company of the Indies, owns Illi- nois, 22. Comparet, Samuel, 275. Conference, first Methodist, 280. Congressional Caucus, 296. Congressional elections, 310, 311. Connor, John, 184. Conolly, John, spy in Kentucky, 103. Constable, 147. Constitutional Convention, 1816, 217-221; members, 218; work not ratified, 218; compared, 219; ana- lyzed, 220 ; put in operation, 222 ; first election under, 222. Constitutional Convention of 1850, 450-461 ; organizing, 454 ; election of delegates to, 455; membership, 456 ; politics of, 456 ; new features, 457 ; ratification of, 460 ; cost, 461. Convention, Democratic, 306, 318, 474, 488. Convention, Whig, 305, 306, 315, 471, 484. Cook-stoves, 422; utensils. 423. Coquillard, Alexis, 275, 324. Corn, uses of, 427. Cornbread, 423. Corn shucking, 428. "Cornstalk" militia, 440, note. Corydon, founded, 206 ; becomes capital, 211 ; government at, 222- 253. County, government of, 168, 225. Cbunty committee, 299. County officers, 147. Courreurs de bois, 9. Courts, county and township, 168, 171. Covington, 276. Covington, S. F., 477. Cox, Sanford, 274. Coyle, Fitzhugh, 371. Cravens, James H., 485. Cravens, William, 281. Crawford, Josiah, 281. Crawford, William, defeated and killed, 86. Crawford county, settled, 208. Crawfordsville, land office at, 241, 344. Creditors of State, 378. Oroghan, George, on the Ohio, 29; journey, 37-40; 186. Crooked Legs, Chief, 104. Cross Cut Canal, 370. Crowe, John Finley, 292. Crozat, Anthony, given grant, 22. Crume, Moses, 281. Cutler, Manasseh, 128. Dablon, 3. Dalton, Valentine, commands at Vin- cennes, 96, 97. Dancing, 431. D'Artiguiette, attacks Chickasaws, 22. Daviess, Jos. H., 186; killed, 189. Daviess county, settled, 207. Davis, Jefferson, 447. Davis, John W., 324, 47a 477^ 479. Davis, Thomas Terry, 167. Deaf and Dumb Asylum, 436. Dearborn county, settled, 204. Debt, State, 376, table, 377. Decker, Luke, wounded, 189. De Forest, Joseph, 206. Defrees, John D., 415, 465, 485. Dela wares, 73 ; a band of, destroyed at Vincennes, 79; visited by Gamelin, 106, 200, 201; go west, 229, 324. Delphi, settled, 274. Democratic factions, 477. Demoiselle, La, 29. Democratic party, on the conven- tion, 453 ; in campaign of 1844, 473. Democratic Speakers, 1840, 319. Denis, M. de St., 20. De Peyster, Arent, carries on border war, 78, 80, 85, 87. Detroit, 9, 156, 157, 158. Dewey, Charles, 204. D'Iberville, 9. Dickey, John McElroy, 284. 506 INDEX Dill, James, 213. "Drag," 427. Drake, James P., 443, 445. Dress of pioneers. 424; fabrics, 424. Dreuillettes, Gabriel, 10. Driftwood, Indians on, 199-200. Dobson, D. M., 479. Door Village, 328, 329. Doughty, John, 101, 109. Douglas, John, 314. Douville, Ensign, at post Miamis, 29. Dowling, Thomas, 485. Dubois, Touissant, 184. Dubuisson, Sieur, at Ouiatanon, 17, 18. "Dugouts," 315. Dumont, Ebenezer, 401. Dumont, John, 252. Dunkards, 285. Dunlap, Livingston, 312. Dunn. George G., 319, 480, 488. Dunn, Isaac, 282. Dunn, Williamson, a ranger, 200, 241, 343. Dunn, William M., 456. Dunning, Paris C, 477. Duvernay, Julian, last Jesuit at Vin- cennes, 30. "Eating Brigade," 366. Eaton, John, 264. Edeline, Louis, 134. Edmunds, J. W., 325. Education, pioneer, 289-296. Edwards, John, 319. Elections, 160, 161; first State, 222. Elliott, Chester, 258. Elliott, Jehu T., 415. Ellis, E. W. H., 411. Embree, Elisha. 485. Enabling Act, 213. English Forts, held after Revolu- tion, 89. Estil, William, 206. Etherington, George, captured, 32. Eugene, 276. Evans. Robert M., 207. Evansville, founded. 207, 239. Ewing, Alexander, 275. Ewing. G. W., 324. Ewing, John, 395. Ewing, Nathaniel, 136, 324. Ewing, W. G.. 324. "Facts for the People," 308. Fallen Timbers, Battle of, 124. Farmers and Mechanics' Bank, 234, 394. Farming, pioneer, 425. Fayette county, settled, 209. Fence-Viewers, 148. Ferguson, John, 392. Ferris, Ezra, 282. Finley, J. B., 323, note. Finney, Walter, 93, 99. Fisher, George. 169. First State Bank, 297. "First Voters" rallies, 320. Five Medals, 194. Flaget, Bishop, 279. Flatboatiug, 269-272. Flatboats, 240. Flemming, William, 206. Floyd, Davis, 169, 179, 206. Floyd county, settled, 206. Fontleroy, R. H., 371, 386. Ford, Lemuel, 331. Ford, William, 442. Fort Chartres, built, 22; descrip- tion, 41. Fort Dearborn, surrendered, 191. Fort Finney, 94. Fort Gage (new name of Chartres), captured, 52. Fort Greenville, built, 122. Fort Harmar, treaty at, 99. Fort Harrison, built, 186, 193, 195, 196, 201; celebration at, 483. Fort Jefferson, 117, 122. Fort Knox, built, 98; council called at, 103, 104, 108, 186, 189. Fort Mcintosh, 93. Fort Miamis, 6; captured, 33; Crog- han at, 39. Fort Recovery, built, 122 ; assaulted, 122, 154. Fort Sackville, (Vincennes) cap- tured, 63. Fort St. Joseph, captured, 32, cap- tured and destroyed by Spanish, 83. Fort St. Louis, 7; destroyed by Iro- quois, 8. Fort Steuben, 94, 95, 99, 103, 203. Fort Wayne, built, 124; treaty at, 163; land cessions, 184. 190, 192, 194; Indian school, 232; settled, 275, 324 ; land office at, 344. Fourth of July, 430. Fox river, 327. Foyles. Mr., opens stage line, 261. Franklinton, 198. Franklin College, 292. Frazier, John, 370. INDEX 507 Fredonia, settled, 241. "Free Democracy," 485. Freeman, , sent among In- dians, killed, 120. Freeman's Corners, 340. Free Soil party, 1844, 474. Freight rates, 358. French, at Vincennes dissatisfied, 173. French settlers, 22-27. Frontier life, 1812-15, 198. Fund Commissioners, 365, 373. Funk, Peter, 186. Furniture of pioneer home, 422. Fur trade, materials of, 26. Fur traders, 3, 23; list given, 25-26. Gage, General, proclamation, 45. Galissoniere, Marquis de la, gover- nor of Canada, 28. Gallatin, Albert, 342, 405. Game, 424. Gamelin, Pierre, agent to Indiana, 104-108, 134. Games, pioneer social, 431. Gards. 204. Garland letter, 475. Geiger. Frederick, 186. Georgetown, 206. Georgetown Bar, 269. Gerald, 204. Germaine, Lord George, arms In- dians, 48. German vote, the, 1844, 475. Gibault, Pierre, assists Clark, 52 ; secures Vincennes, 53. Gibson, John, secretary, 155, 156; duties, 162, 199, 210. Gibson county, settled, 207. Girty, George, 85. Girty, Simon, Indian partisan, 48; in Kentucky, 80. Godfrey, a French partisan at Fort Miami, 33. Gooding, Lieut., wounded, 189. Goose-pulling, 431. •"Gore," 157, 159, 173, 340. Gorman, Willis A., 449. Gosix)rt, settled, 209. "Grace Darling," 444. Grand Glaize, 123. Grant county, 197. Grassy Valley, 205. Gravier, at mouth of Ohio, 15. Grays, 204. Great Lakes, 1. Greensburg, rally, 1840, 320. Greenville treaty, 124; second treaty, 202, 203. Griffin, 6. Griffin. John, 167. Grouseland, treaty of, 163. Grover, M. G., 328. Gwathmey, Samuel, 170. Hackleman, Pleasant, 465. Haddon, W. R., 447. Half-faced camp, 421. Hall, Samuel, 366. Hamilton, Allen, 324. Hamilton, Henry, at Detroit, 47 ; re- captures Vincennes, 56; surren- ders, 66. Hamilton, James, 204: \ Hamilton coimty, (Ohio) organized, 131. Hamtramck, John F., 97, 101, 103; moves up Wabash, 110, 111; with St. Clair, 117; with Wayne, 124. Hand, Edward, commands Pittsburg, 49. Handy, Henry S., 303. Hanna, Samuel, 259, 275, 324. Hannegan, Edward A., 304, 311, 335, 469, 479, 483. Hanover College, 292. Hanover, convention at 306. "Hard Money" Democrats, 408. Hard times, 1819, 247. Hardin, John, commander of mili- tia, 108; defeated on Eel river, 109; again at Fort Wayne, 110; with Scott, 113; killed, 120. Hardins, 204. Hardy, Thomas, 127. Hargrave, Hudson, 206. Hargrave, Richard, 281. Harmar, Josiah, commands in the west, 92, 91 ; ordered to Vincen- nes, 96, 101; attacks Indians, 109; defeated, 116. Harris, Horatio J., 380. Harrison, Christopher, 223 ; candi- date for governor, 250, 255. Harrison, Joseph, 157. Harrison, William Henry, on land cessions, 135; elected to Congress, 1.50 ; in Congress, 151 ; governor, 155; character, 161, 182, 183, 184; at Tippecanoe. 186-190; 194, 197, 202, 312, 313, 314. Harrison county, settled, 205. Harrod, William, joins Clark, 49. Hart, John, 206. Harvest, 427. 508 INDEX Hawkins, Eli, 207. Hay, John, 170. Heath, Andrew, surveyor, 137. Heald, Nathan, 191. Helm, Leonard, joins Clark, 49. Hendricks, Thomas A., 456. Hendricks, William, elected to Congress. 222; governor, 250. Henry, Patrick, assists Clark, 48. Herriott, Samuel, 319. Heth. R. M., 206. Hickory creek, 327. Hinds, Thomas, 321. Historical Society, organized, 288. "Hob-nails," 472. Hog Island. 266. Holman, Jesse D., 223. Holman, Joseph, 275, 324, 344. Holman, W. S., 456. Holmes, Ensign, killed, 33. Home life, 421. Hoosier dialect, 419. Hoover. David, 358. Hopkins, Samuel, 195, 196. Horseshoe Plain, Clark crosses, 62. House, pioneer. 421. Hovey. Alvin P., 456. Howard, Tilghman A., 319, 469. Hull, William, surrenders, 191. Huron Indians, 3, destroyed, 72. Illinoia, 128. Illinois, cut ofE from Indiana, 158, 210. Illinois Coimtiy, government under English, 28-47 ; under Virginia, 67. Illinois Land Company, 43. Immigration to Indiana, 244. Inflationists, 409. Indian Creek, 204. Indiana Territory, boundaries, 154 ; census of, 155; counties. 156; set off from Illinois, 158; raised to second grade. 159; legislature of, 169-170; development of, 178-180; commerce, 180. Indiana, admission of, 215. Indiana College, 292. Indiana Freeman, a campaign paper, 474. Indiana Sabbath school union, 286. Indiana University, 292. Indianapolis, site of, 237; the State capital, 238; name, 239; settled, 244. Indianapolis Water Company. 376. Indians, visit Montreal, 3; of In- diana, 70-78 ; become wards of the nation, 89-91; their government, 90; last struggle for Ohio river, 92-125; 228-233; boundary line, 228; schools, 230; drunkenness, 231-232; treaty at Fort Harrison, 229; at St. Mary's, 229; removal of, 323 seq. Internal Improvements party, 304, 305, 462. Internal Improvements System, 352 seq. ; lobby for, 363 ; Mammoth Bill, 363; construction of, 366; political results, 462, 464. Irish, 359. Iroquois, destroy Hurons, 3; attack Miamis, 12. Irvine, William, 86. Jackson. Andrew, loses vote of Wa- bash counties, 308. Jacksonian party, 296-304. Jala pa, 197. Jenkins, captured, 32. Jefferson, Thomas, 127 ; plans Jeffer- souville, 204. Jeffersonville, 203. Jennings, Jonathan, 198, 204, 211, 213, 215; elected governor, 223, 229; to Congress, 250, 324, 353. Jennings county, settled, 209. Jesuits plan an Indian Nation, 1. Jaunay, Pierre du, priest at Ouia- tanon, 30. John, Robert, 357. Johnson. James, 136, 261, 262. Johnson, John, 169; Indian agent, 231. Johnson, Robert, 274. Johnson, R. M., 311. 312. Johnson, William Cost, plan of, 473. Johnson, Sir William, report on In- dians, 29. Johnson county, settled, 243. Joliet, sees Ohio river, 13. Jones, John Rice, 170. Jones, Peter, 213. Jucherau de St. Denis, at mouth of Ohio. 15. Judnh, Samuel, 304, 308, 311, 318, 319, 357. Judges, territorial, their work, 140- 142. Julian, George W., 486. Kankakee portage, 6. 13. Kaskaskia, capture of, 48. Kekionga, Indian town, 77; visited by Gamelin, 106. INDEX 509 Kelso, Daniel, 259, 456, 469. Kennedy, Andrew, 470. Kentuckians, hostile to the Indians, 102; loyal, 103, 112. Kethtipecanunc, 114. Kickapoos, village, 104 ; hostile, 105 ; raided, 115; leave the State, 229. Kilgore, David, 456. Kiniberlin, John, 206. Knight, Jonathan, a surveyor, 256. Knox county organized, 137. Krouch, Jean, 120. La Balme, attempt on Detroit, 82; killed, 83. Lafayette, settled, 274; a port of entry, 307. Laffont, Jean, agent of Clark, 53. LaFollette, Robert, 206. Lagro, 276; riot at, 360. La Jeune, 2. Lake Indians, hostile, 105, 115. Lakin, Benjamin, 280. Lalumiere, Bishop, 280. Lamberville, Jean de, 11. Lamorinie, John Baptist, among the Miamis, 30. Lancaster, Morris, 319. Land claims, 132-137; by town of Vincennes, 132 ; by Illinois Land Company, 132 ; Wabash Land Com- pany, 132 ; rejected by Congress, 133 ; by French settlers, 134 ; gifts by Congress. 135 ; to militia, 135. Land Companies, 42; Walpole, 43; Mississippi, 43 ; Illinois, 43 ; Wa- bash, 43, Land, low, 152; 153. Land, price, 345, 358. Land Offices, 160, 342; embezzle- ment at, 349-350; auctions at, 349; land sold, tables, 350. Land Office at Crawfordsville, 273. Land sales, 344, 359. Lane, Daniel C, 223. Lane, James H., 448, 448, 485. Lane, H. S., 442, 471. Lane, Joseph, 447, 449. Lanier, J. F. D., 304, 394, 404, 405. L'Anguille, visited by Gamelin, 106; destroyed by Wilkinson, 115. La Plante, Pierre, 184. LaPorte land office, 344. La Salle, 3-8. Latshaw, Joseph, 264. "Lawrence," steamer, 267. Lawrenceburg, founded, 204. Leavenworth, founded, 208. Lee, Arthur, Indian Commissioner, 92, 127. Legion, 122. Legislation, of first Assembly, 172. Legislative Council, first, 150. Legras, J. M. P., commandant at Vincennes, 67, 97, 134. Legris, Miami chief, 106, 124, Lexington, settled, 206. Liberty party, 480. Ligneris, Marchand de, commandant at Ouiatanon, 30. Lilly, William H., Auditor of State, 223. Liquor Question, in 1839, 317, 466, Liquor traffic, 163, 164, 171, 181. Little Turtle, defeats La Balme, 83, 122, 123, 124, 181, 182, 190, 191; home spared, 194, 195. Liverpool, 239. Lobelia, 434. Local legislation, 453. Lochry, Archibald, raises company for Clark, 84; ambushed and killed, 85. Lockport, 276. Loftis, Arthur, attempts to reach Illinois, 40. Logan, Benjamin, 81, 82, raid on Ohio Indians, 95. Logansport, settled, 274; site of In- dian agency, 324. Log-house, 422. Log-rolling, 425. Logstown, 28. Long, Elisha, 366, Lorain, a French trader, 33. Lord, Hugh, 133. Louis XIV, 9. Louisiana Purchase, under Indiana, 157. Lucas, E. F., 385. Madison, founded, 200, Madison bank, 234. Madison railroad, 264, 376, Magic Bowl, 188. Mail service, early, 272, 273. Maisonirtle, a French trader, 33. Maiden, 183, 326. Mansfield, Jared, 340. Maria Creek, 209. Marietta, settled, 130. Marin, Sieur Laperriere, at St, Joseph, 29. Marpack, Indian chief, 190, Marquette, 3; death, 13. Marshall, Joseph G., 469, 471, 477. 510 INDEX Marshall, William, 326. Matchedash Bay, 3. "Matilda Barney," on the St. Jos- eph, 269. Matson, John A., 485. Mauck, Frederick, 206. Mauckport, 200. Maxwell, David H., 366, 371. Maxwell Code, 142, 146. Maysville, founded, 207. Madison, founded, 188. Menard, Pierre, 170. Menominee, 334. Mercer, John, 99. Merrill, Samuel, 401, 406. Methodist Churches, early, 280. Metociuiah Creek, 147. Metropotamia, 128. Meurin, Sebastian, at Vincennes, 30. Mexican War, 438; organizing troops for, 441 ; political effects, 478. Mia mis, 10-12; return to Indiana, 16; at St. Jaques, 17; their con- federacy, 71 ; description, 75 ; tra- ditions, 77; war, 104-125; visited by Gamelin, 106, 190, 323, 324, 328, 332, 336. Mia mi sport, 276. Michigan, cut ofC from Indiana, 157, 158. Michigan Road, 257-261. Michigania, 128. Michillimacinac, captured, 32. Militia, law, 164, 165; numbers, 180; paraded, at Vincennes, 186; in War of 1812, 198; in Mexican War, 439; arms of, 440. Miller, James, at Fort Harrison, 187, 196. Milliken, J. P., 489. Mills. 428. Mills, John, 137. Milroy, Samuel, 308, 311, 349. Mingoes, 73. Mishawaka, iron foundry, 269. ,v Missionaries, Hurons, 2. Mississinewa, battle, 196-198. Mississippi Company, given the Illi- nois Country, 22. Mississippi Land Company, 43. Mitchell, Dr. D. G., Anti-Mason candidate, 309. MofEatt, James T., 319. Monroe, James, 127 ; visits State, 251. Monroe electors, 222. Monrovia, 386. Montezuma, 187. Montgomery, John, joins Clark, 50. Montgomeryville, 252. Moore, Asa, 355. Moore, Harbin, 303. Moore, T. P., 273. Moravian Towns, 86. Morris, Thomas, at Fort Miami, 35. Morrison, Alexander F., 312. Morrison, James, 312, 401, 469. Morrison, John I., 456. Morrisons, 204. Morrow, Jeremiah, 215. Munsees, 197. Murray, William, 132. Muster day, 166. Mt. Pleasant, settled, 209. McAfee, Robert B., 313. McCarty, A., stage owner, 261. McCarty, Jonathan, 305, 321. McCarty, Nicholas, 273, 324, 488. McClellan, Abraham, 259. McCoy, Captain, 113. McCoy, Isaac, missionary, 230. McCulloch, Hugh, 416. McDonald, John, 258. McFarland, William, 211. McGary, Hugh, 207. McGaughey, E. W., 476. McGrady, James, 283. McMahan, Richard, killed, 189. National Democrats, 305. National Road, 255. Navigation of Streams, 263-269. Naylor, Isaac, 321. Neely, John I., 258. New, Robert A., 178; secretary of State, 223. New Albany, founded, 206. Newberry, 390. New Castle, laid out, 244. New Coshocton, 93. Newell, Captain, 327, 329. New Harmony, 248. "New Light," 285. Newport, laid out, 240; bank at, 412. New Orleans market, 173. New Purchase, 229, 239-248. New Year, 430. Niblack, John, 241. Niles, 232. Noble, James, elected Senator, 223, 343. Noble, Lazarus, 343. Noble, Noah, 259, 266, 304, 309, 331, 343, 363, 366, 369, 401. INDEX 511 Norris, Seton W., 312. Northwest Territory, in treaty of 1783, 88 ; organization of, 126 ; ces- sion of by Virginia, 126; State names suggested, 128 ; government, 130; first legislature, 130; under the judges, 138; civil government, 142; second grade, 149; division of, 152. Note shaving, 347-348. Notre Dame du Lac, 293. Oatman's Ferry, 200. Occupations, pioneer, 424. Office holding clique, 160. Ohio river, discovered by La Salle, 5. Oliver, William, 192. Orchard, John, stage, 262. Ordinance of 1787, 129. Oregon, 439. Orleans, laid out, 241, Orr, General, 331. Orth, Godlove S., 477. Osborn, Andrevp L., 415. Ottawas, 328. Ouiatanon, stockade built, 17; not rebuilt, 18; captured, 32; Croghan at, 38; Indian council at, 94. Ouiatanons, return to Indiana, 16; home of, 77. Outrelay, Etienne de, wrote of Vin- cennes, 19. Outrelay, Pierre de, mentioned Vin- cennes, 19. Owens, Abraham, 186, 189. Owen, David, ranger, 200. Owen, Robert Dale, 456, 470, 479, 483, 485. "Owl Creek" Currency, 395, 411. Pack horses, for Harmar's army, 108. Palestine, settled, 241. Palmer. Nathan B., 309, 374, 469. Panic of 1837, 403. Paoli, settled, 241. Paper money, in Illinois, 68. "Paragon," runs to Logansport, 267. Parish's Grove, 327. Parke, Benjamin, 169; elected to Congress, 170; judge, 223, 288. Parke county, settled, 240. Parker, Samuel, 281. Parsons, Samuel H., 128, 131, 141. Pasteur, Thomas, at Fort Knox, 124. Paul, John, 206. Paul, John P., 371. Paupers, 148. Payne, Colonel, 195. Pelisipia, 128. Penalties, 148. Pennington, Dennis, 206, 214, 282. People, The, of Indiana, 418, 419. Pepper, Abel, 325, 334, 456. Perier, M., mentions Vincennes, 19. Perry county, settled, 208. Peru, 276. Peters, Lieut., wounded, 189. Petersburg, settled, 205. Pettit, Father, 338. Pettit, John, 479. Peyrode, Ensign Chevalier de la, at Ouiatanon. 29. Pfrimmer, Samuel, 206. Physicians, 432. Piankeshaw Indians, friendly to Clark, 55; towns raided, 102. Pierce, Franklin, 489. Pierce, Capt., killed, 197. Pierro. Don, captures St. Joseph, 83. Pickett, Heathcote, 204. Pigeon Roost Massacre, 193. Pike county, settled, 205. Pine Creek, 187. Piqua, 192. Piqua Plains, 87. Pittsburg, 276. Plank roads, 257. Plowing, 426. Plum creek, 204. Point Commerce, 370. Political demoralization, 475. Politics, 1825 to 1840, 296; 1840 to 1852, 462-490. Polk, James K., 439. Polke, Judge William, 259, 316, 321, 338. Polk's Bottom, 208. Polypotamia, 128. Pontiac's War, 31-37. Population, 214, 215, 277. Portage Prairie, 329. Port Royal Bluffs, 266, 370. Posey, Thomas, governor, 162, 206; candidate for governor, 250. Posey county, settled, 207. Pottawattomies, cede land for a road, 257, 323, 324, 328, 332, 334. Prairie Pottawattomies, 327. Presbyterian churches, early, 283, 285. Pride, Woolsey, 205. Prince, William, 184. Princeton, founded, 208. Prior, Abner, 139. 512 INDEX Proclamation of 1763, 41. Proctor, Henry, 192. Proctor, John, envoy among Indians, 112. Propliet opposes liquor, 163 ; sketcla, 182, 183. Prophetstown, 183, 189. Public Lands, 340. Putnam, Rufus, superintendent of Indian affairs, 120, 128. Quarter Sessions, 146. Quebec Act, 44. Querez, Pierre, 134. Quilting, 426. Railroad Charters, 360. Randolph, Thomas, killed, 189. Randolph county settled, 209. Rangers, in War of 1812, 198. Raunels, Samuel, 283. Rappe, Fi-ederick, 248. Rarideu, James, 456. Rawley's Mill, 386. Ray, James Brown, 302, 309. Ray, J. M., 401, note; 416, 436. Raymond, David, 223. Read, James G., 304, 309, 456. Recipes, medical, 433-434. Reed, Daniel. 456. "Reformers," 285. Removal of Indians, 332. "Republican"' on upper Wabash, 269. Reynolds, David, 440. Reynolds. John, 326. Rhea, James, 192. Richardville, Deroite de, commands Vincennes, 45. Richmond, laid off, 243. Riley, James, 344, 354. Riley, Michael, 370. Ripley county, 209. River ports. 4(X). Roach, Addison L., 415. Roads, early, 254, 257. Robb, David, 214. "Robert Hanna" at Indianapolis, 266. Robinson, A. L., 488. Robinson, Edmund, 252. Robinson. Joseph, 320. Robertson, Samuel, 2.83, 284. Rocheblave, Philip de. 52. Rockport, laid off, 241. Rockville, founded, 240. Rogers, John, commands "Willing." 60. Rogers, Robert, takes possession ot Detroit, 31, Rome, founded, 208. Ross, A. L. and A. W., 261. Ross, John, at Chartres, 40. Ross, W. L.. 262. Rothschild, Baron, 374. Rough and Ready Clubs, 483. Russell, A. W., 329. Russell, William, 194, 195, 200. "Sac Trail," 275, 328. "Sacred Beans," 188. Salem, laid out, 241. Sales of land, amounts. 347. Sandusky captured, 32. Saratoga, 128. Sargent, Winthrop, 131, 150. Sauk Indians, 326. Saunders, John, guides Clark, 51. Scalps, bought by English, 48. Schenck, Edwin, 372. Schlosser, Ensign, captured, 32. Schools, earliest, 249. Schrader, John. 281. Scott, Charles, attacks Wea towns, 112; with St. Clair, 116. Scott, James, 282. Scott, Samuel Thornton, 284. Scott, Winfield, 489. Scott county, settled, 206. Scribner Brothers, 206. Scrip, 348. Seamans, John B., 483. Second principal meridian, 340. Second Regiment, 447 seq. Seminaries, 178. Sering, John, 394. Settlements. 13, 203; of New Pur- chase, 239-248; of Wabash Coun- try, 273. Shawnees, 74 visited by Gamelin, 106; depredations on the Ohio, 107, 182, 183. Shee, John, 133. Shelby. Governor, 312. Sheriff, 146. Shipping i)orts on Ohio river, 240. Shockeys, 77. Shooting match, 430. Shriver, James, 355. Sickness. 247 ; among pioneers, 432. Sillimau, Willis, 358. Silver Heels, a Munsee chief, 197. Simcoe, Governor, 123. Simpson, Matthew, 436. Simrall. Colonel, 194. Slavery. 138, 150, 173; a slave code, 174, 175, 251, 252. INDEX 513 Small, Jobn, sheriff, 149. Smiley, Ross, 456. Smith, Caleb B., 368, 476, 480. Smith, Jay C, 281. Smith, O. H., 322, 375, 469; Whig chairman, 474. Smith, Thomas L., 415. Smith, William, land agent, 133. Social life, 418 seq. Serin, Father, 293. Spanish, active in the west, 83 ; cap- ture St. Joseph, 84; invite French settlers, 103. Specie circular, 347. 403, 404. Spencer founded, 209. Spencer, John W., 409. Spencer, Spier, killed, 189. Splunge creeli, 386. Spring\'ille, 203. Sprinklesburg, laid out, 241. St. Ange at Vinceunes, 22. St. Clair, Arthur, governor, 99; leads expedition, 116-118; de- feated, 119; asks court-martial, 121 ; goes to Illinois, 131, 312. St. Clair, Jr., trip to Vinceunes, 143. St. Clair county, 156. St. Clair, William, 140. St. Francis Xavier Church, 279. St. Jacques, Miamis at, 17. St. Peters. 293. Stage lines, 254, 261, 263. Stansbury, Howard, 371. Stapp, Milton, 475. State Bank, First, 233-236; branch- es, 233-234. State seminary, 291. State University, land agent, 214. Sterling, Thomas, reaches Illinois, 41. Stewart, William, 409, 410. Stevenson, Alexander C, 475, 478. Stickuey, B. F., 190. Stores, pioneer, 428. Storms, Peter. 206. "Stubble call," 427. Sugar creek, 327. Sullivan, General, destroys Iroquois, 47. Sullivan, G. R. C, 223. Sullivan, Jeremiah, 239, 308, 311. 358. Sullivan. Thomas L., 442. Summers, W. E., 252. Supreme court, territorial, 167. Survey, 340 seq. Sweetser. Philip, 319. Switzerland county, settled, 204. Symmes, John Cleves, 97; a judge, 131, 140. Sylvania, 128. Talbott, H. E., 413. Tarke, 124. Tarkington, John S., 412. Taverns, 429. Taxation, Northwest Territory, 147. Taylor, Waller, a senator, 223; cen- sured, 253. Taylor, Zachary, at Fort Harrison, 193, 195, 196, 200 ; in Mexico, 441, 445, 447. Tecumseh, opposes liquor, 164; sketch, 182; at Vinceunes, 184 j killed, 201. Temperance society, Indiana, 287. Terre Coupee, 329. Terre Haute, 126, 186, 209; 240, 241; land oflace, 343. Test, Charles, 318, 456, 480. Test, John, 223; injured, 263. Texas, 438 ; Independence of, 440 ; in campaign of 1844, 473. Thom, Allen D., 223. Thomas, Jesse B., 169. Thompson, John T., 286. Thompson, R. W., 319, 480, 488. "Thompsoniaus," 434. Three per cent fund, 254, 255. Tippecanoe, campaign of, 186-190; county, 274 ; celebration, 313. Tipton, John, 199-201; founds Lo- gansport, 274, 307, 311, 323, 324, 331, 336. Tipton, Spier S., 442. Todd, John, appointed governor of Illinois, 67. Traces, early, 246. Traders, licensed, 10. Trail, Vinceunes, 159 ; travelers on, 180. Travel, pioneer, 429. Treaties, Indian, 163. Treaty Grounds, 323. "Triton," 265. Trotter, Colonel, quarrels with Har- din, 108. Truman, Major Alexander, sent among Indians, killed, 120. Turner, George, a judge, 139, 140. Twelve Mile Purchase. 210, Twightwees, (see Miamis), Twin Lake Mission, 335. University, Vinceunes, 176; town- ship of land donated, 177, 292. 514 INDEX Vaile. Rawson, 483. Vallouia, center of ranger service, 199-201; 209. Vance, Samuel, 204, 275. 344. Vanderburg, Henry, 136, 139, 140, 149, 167. Vandeveer, Joel, 370. Varnum, James M., a judge, 131. Vaudreuil, 16. Vaud, Canton, 204. Vawter, Jesse, 206. Vawter, John, 314, 316, 321. Vermillion Towns, attacked by Clark, 95. Vermillion Sea, 4. Vevay, settled, 204, 248. Vigilance Committee, 299. Vigo, Francis, assists Clark, 57, 136, 137, 145, 184. Vigus. C, stage line, 262. Vigus, Jordan, 316, 324. Villiers. Neyon de, leaves Illinois, 40, 45. Vincennes, mentioned. 19, 20, 21 ; settlement of, 21 ; cliurch records, 23 ; land grant. 23 ; commons, 23- 24; Croghan at, 37; captured by Clark's men, 54; recaptured by British. 55; taken by Clark, 59- 67 ; in 17.S8, 98 ; land claim, 132 ; condition in 1790, 137 ; population, 155: land office. 160, 167, 179; capital, 210, 211; turnpike, 364, 370. Vincennes, Francois Morgane de, at Ouiatanon, 18; at Vincennes, 20; death, 20. Vincennes, Sieur de, among the Mi- amis, 16; died, 17. Virginia Cession. 127. Virginia conquers the Northwest, 47 ; organizes government, 67. Viviat. Louis, 132. Vivier, Louis, at Vincennes, 21, 30. "Wabash, home of Miamis, 77, 307. Wabash and Erie Canal, 355; land donated for, 356. .359, 364; com- pletion of, 378; failure of, 390- 393. Wabash Land Company, 43. Walker, William, 442. Walker. Jacob, 328, 329. Wallace, David, 336, 369, 456. Wallace, James H., stage owner, 262. Wallace, Lew, 442. Walpole, Thomas D., 456. Walpole Company, 43. W^ar with Miamis, 101, 104-125; of 1812, 203. Warrick, Jacob, killed, 189. Warrick county, settled, 206. Washington, George, Indian policy, 102. Washington, 128, 239. Washington county, settled, 207. Watrin, Francais Philibert, wrote ^ about Vincennes, 21. Watts, Edward, 371. ■^"' )/ Watts, John Sebrie, 370. JJ Wayne, Anthony. 122-125, 181. Wayne county, old, 156 ; new, 157. Wayne county, 199. Weas. visited by Gamelin, 105; town destroyed, 113; sends dele- gates for peace, 120, 324. Weddings, 431. Wells, Samuel, 186, 194. Western Company owns Illinois, 22. Western Eagle, founded, 206. Western Sim, criticises Jennings, 217. Whetzell's Trace, 243. Whig speakers in 1840, 319 note; measures in 1841, 463; organiza- tion in 1844, 471; last campaign, 484. Whipping. 148, 149. Whitcomb, James. 322, 470, 471, 474, 477, 483. White, Albert S., 476. White. Isaac, killed, 189. Whitewater Valley, in Indiana, 159; settlement, 160 ; dissatisfaction in, 173: survey of, 355, 362; canal, 364, 375. White Oak Springs, 205. Whitlock. Ambrose. 241. 243. Wildcat creek, ambuscade. 196, 200. Wiley, Allen. 281. Wilkinson. James, 113; attacks Kethtipecanunc, 114 ; leads expe- dition, 114-115. Willard, Ashbel P., 488. Wlllard, William, 436. Williams, Jesse L., 359, 366, 369, 371, 372. Williams, John, commands Fort Gage, 55. Williams, Jonathan, 262. Williams, William, 488. Williamson, David, destroys Morav- ian towns, 86. Williamsport, 276. Wilmot Proviso, 486. INDEX 515 Wilson, John, land agent, 133. Wilson, John, opens stage line, 261. Wilson, Thomas, 206. Winamac, Indian chief, 191. Winamac, land office, 201, 344. Winans, William, 281. Winchester, James, 195. Wingate, Hiram, 206. Wolf, Jacob, 264. Woodburn, John, 366. Wright, John, 285. Wright, John W., 485. Wright, Joseph A., 390, 410, 412, 413, 470, 477, 479, 485, 486, 489. Wyandots, 72, 184. Wylie, Alex, 312. Wyllys, John, 101. "Yellow Jackets," flag of, 321. Zeigler, David, 97. Zenor, John, 320. ;P # *. *. * *.>■ . J». »rJ^.r ., t*,,^ ** j^ * * »■ #^ t, l\.^, te;#. -J^^^f* # ^1 ■ # J^ #^ #: Jr lif 1^.- U ■ '-^ ^^ '^ ■ ¥ W #' # i^ ^ f^ >^' '^ «:'#^"i^ #'p- &*• i* I* #; li ^ fe ir :l» I« :{* ^§*-'#'^#:' t^r # It' {*^- 1^ I*- l^ P # -t^ \^ i^' *iw r ^ m- 44. m ■^:i i» ^ m^- ^^' ¥ S^ ^ 1^. ^- t^'*^' .J^'p' 1*^ fti' d^' i* It' P ■»■ a- -I* '^ -l^' -t^ 'i^- -f* '• I* fi." ^^'^ V^ ?* fft ' !«• H. i*i 1* Vf' -^ ^ f It i- r-:-^ W #'-.|^ If N P'- i*- t*' ■,':^' 1^ -1^ I** ^^, 'fc^ ■- 4^ -I^- -^^^^ ?1^v J^ .p^ fr ip- ^1*^ ^- .^^ l^" ^ P' V^ P-: ^' '1% ^^'ii^^ P^^ -li- it % -m i:g J^ If : i* |i fr # 1;^- •j^' .-^s^/ -ir ^p' \M.' -W' pi ^' W' I^ S^ It. p^- l^t fii ^ 4* • !^f^ ■.!%■# It^ {8;' I^i ^a' Iff ^H W ^ ^ Ir -^ P 1- ■p"]^ ^m -u ^$^' W w >i^ * P '^ ^ i*- 1^. ^*. ^, fe: .fr" #■■ 'f*. i%' T^ ^* Jt; t« .% ^. p &* 1^-^ i^ W IP ii'' i^^' -m' m^ m' -M , it . U ^r I» ii:- ^ Fi ft- ^' !i^ r f!ii^^|^".{l\l|r'" #■■ /l^^* n' -IM: * -P 1^^ -f^ 1^; ^^ "^ # 4^" ii" 1^^ ^t ^¥ •i^'t -I* ir 1^ # f^. P -.i^ F' ^- 'y^: V {^^ 1% ^%-'m ff^ ■ &!^' I» '^ :ip: ¥■ .» r P. t; i« ^; i I« ]%■■ ..'*:^ jli^' 5%:' It: ^' ^' it 1# -.^ lis ■ I*: ft •!*" h?' «'-''o?«^' -r*-" >*' ■^*' -I*' W p:' .h 'i^ t^ I*' !^' ■^' 8^ ^^' '^ ^%'^ ^¥ '-iw' p^ ■*■' -^t^'' t«i m- M W' * #' ^' i* * -^ ii'^*" .(*' % .SS:' jir' ti-' 13^^ it'' #^ ^ ^.. 'ij^ #• Nf- -^ / .^i¥" :i^r.^j>«' m' -^^ ^ ^- p 1^- f*' 1*^^ >* ^ 1«^ '> !*• ..- .'„ ■ -^ -r.. '„. f.. -:;*. ^■:^. • V* -^ w _,^ |j^ 1^ |g || ,j|; .^. t^ p a. m #. fit ^*^ t^.' (* f^ ;*- i^' (* i^- -0 ■v$'' im' W M it # f» ^(5.- -^ iss m-. .1^- jf p?: . ^' p^i(*."-4^.' l«\jf- .!« (*• ># >- I* -[* ii^ (t. l^' I U- i*>' it" 'ij^' -^'^ :f- :^: ^ ' '" ''" "■ ^"'' " ■ " 't*^- («■ l^- !» isr-..^. 9*. .»'^ .V'l,. :i:«^