% ,^ ,,.. ^ A V^ " \V «l» ^V V ... V"/— -^^ ^*^' '"- •■ ' "^ \ if-. • > THE LAW IN SHAKESPEARE Affectic tua nomen imponit operi tuo. Br acton. Why may not that be the skull of a la^wyer[? Ilaiiilet. By C. K. DAVIS. ST, PAUL : WEST PrBLISHIXG C03IPANY. 1884. Copyright, 1883, BY C. K. Davis. /Z - 3/// INTRODUCTIOX. SHAKESPEARE'S persistent and correct use of law terms was long ago noticed and caused the conjecture that he must have studied in an attor- ney's office. What is the truth in this respect will probably never be certainly known ; but that he was more addicted to the employment of legal nomen- clature than any English writer (excepting, of course, the jurists) is incontestable. The work of winter evenings, commenced long ago, as an incident to habitual study of the works of him "who converted the elements which awaited at his command into entertainments," is submitted with little speculation upon questions concerning which there have been many words and few demon- strations. It is not pretended that every legal phrase which he used is here presented. The aim has been not to extend the task beyond the necessity of proof into a wearisome repetition of expressions which often recur in scores. To the lawver many of the (3) THE LAW IN SHAKESPEARE. notes will be needless, though some of them will be found helpful. I have not hesitated to present the definitions of the commonest legal terms. Ta those unversed in law lore, they will present at a glance the argument intrinsic in the text. Some of the quotations, taken alone, are doubtless of in- fling probative force. They are given because, in cumulative testimony, each independent fact is a multiplier. AVe seem to have here something more than a sciolist's temerity of indulgence in the terms of an unfamiliar art. No legal solecisms will be found. The abstrusest elements of the common law are impressed into a disciplined service with every evidence of the right and knowledge of com- manding. Over and over again, where such knowl- edge is unexampled in writers unlearned in the law, Shakespeare appears in perfect possession of it. In the law of real property, its rules of tenure and de- scents, its entails, its fines and recoveries, and their vouchers and double vouchers; in the procedure of the courts, the methods of bringing suits and of arrests, the nature of actions, the rules of pleading, the law of escapes, and of contempt of court; in THE LAW IN SHAKESPEARE. the principles of evidence, both technical and phil- osophical; in the distinction between the temporal and the spiritual tribunals ; in the law of attainder and forfeiture; in the requisites of a valid mar- riage; in the presumption of legitimacy; in the learning of the law of prerogative ; in the inaliena- ble character of the crown, — this mastership ap- pears with surprising authority. It is not necessary in accounting for this to as- sault truth with a paradox, or to put a mask upon the face of the first of men. The law books of that time were few. Shakespeare's French is nearly as bad as the law French in which many of them were written; and it is not to be forgotten that to learn must have been easy to this man, whose mental endowments were so universal that the best intel- lects of after times have vainl}^ essayed to admeas- ure them. Coleridge has remarked "that a young author's first work almost always bespeaks his recent pur- suits." He might have said with equal correctness that any author's works can never entirely hide his former pursuits. These may be betrayed by the style, or by prejudices, aft'ections, antipathies, or af- THE LAW IN SHAKESPEARE. fectations. Gibbon thought that his experience as an officer in the Hampshire militia was of assistance to him in describing that vast nutation in history whereby the Eoman world, by a process almost physical in appearance, shifted from temperate sim- plicity, grandeur, civilization, and solidity to trop- ical luxury, effeminacy, barbarism, and quick decay. Were every detail of Falconer's and Somerville's lives unknown, it would be certain from their works that the one was a sailor and the other a sports- man. Sir Walter Scott had been called to the bar and his works attest his legal proficiency. We see Fielding's experience as a magistrate in the ex- amination of Partridge, in the conspiracy between Lady Booby and Lawyer Scout against Fanny, and in that masterpiece of savage irony, the life of the late Mr. Jonathan Wild the Great. We know from the details of mercantile routine in Eobinson Crusoe and Colonel Jack that Defoe must have been a merchant. That Thackeray had been an artist is very apparent in his works. Donne, (1572- 1631,) who had been a student at Lincoln's Inn, satirized a barrister's wooing in law phrase : THE LAW IN SHAKESPEARE. " he throws, Like nets or lime twigs, wheresoe'r he goes, His title of barrister on every wench, And woos in language of the pleas and bench. A motion, lady ! Speak, Coscus. I have been In love e'er since tricesirao the queen. Continual claims I've made, injunctions got To stay my rival's suit, that he should not Proceed ; spare me, in Hilary term I went ; You said if I returned next 'size in Lent, I should be in remitter of your grace. In th' interim my letters should take place Of affidavits." The argument on the present question rests, mainly, of course, upon the general and constant emplo^^ment by Shakespeare of the terms of a sci- ence which, in his time, was crabbed and harsh, and which has at any time few points of contact with the graces of literature. There is another special argument of great force, in presenting which my inadequate resources for comparison restrict me to the use of Hamlet, though I have no doubt that corroborative results will be yielded to any one who may make a more extended investigation. Hamlet was published in quarto in 1603. Com- pared with the final version which appeared in the folio of 1623, it is a magnificent imperfection, but S THE LAW IN SHAKESPEARE. invaluable because it shows how the hand of the master wrought upon his work. From the one to the other we see Shakespeare's mind in operation. Its creative processes are disclosed. Its industry is demonstrated. Here are the blotted lines Jonson wished for. We see the growth of immortal blos- soms from barren common-places. It is as if some sculptor, with an enchanter's power, had wrought upon an unadorned Milan cathedral through one night, so that the morning showed thousands of carvings and statues where the day before were only walls of unadorned simplicity. If Shakespeare's use of legal learning were not that of a full man, with pride in his skill, we should not expect to see, in the changes by which he brought the play to perfection, any additions or elaborations in that respect. But that they do ap- pear most remarkably, the following, in which the text of the quarto is given, together with that of the finished version, will show: Who by a seale compact, well ratified by law And lieraldrie, did forfeit with his life all those His lands which he stood seazed of to the conqueror, Against the which a moiety competent Was gaged by our king {Quarto.) THE LAW IN SHAKESPEARE. To this Shakespeare added which had returned To the mheritance of Fortinbras, Had he been vanquisher ; as by the same covenant And carriage of the article designed, His fell to Hamlet. He hath, mv lord, wrung from me a forced graunt. [Quarto.) He hath, my lord, wrung from me my slow leave. By laborsome petition, and at last Upon his will 1 sealed my hard consent. {Standard Version.) Or that the Everlasting had not fixYl His canon 'gainst self-slaughter ! {Not in Quarto.) •Oph. My lord, he hath made man}' tenders of his love to me. Cor. Tenders. I, I, tenders you may call them. Oph. And withall such earnest vowes. Cor. Springes to catch woodcocks. What, do 1 not know when the blood doth burne How prodigall the tongue lends the heart vowes. In brief, be more scanter of 3'our maiden presence. Or tendering thus you'l tender mee a foole. {Quarto.) Oph. He hath, my lord, of late made many tenders Of his affection to me. Pol. Affection ! Pooh ! You speak like a green girl Unsifted in such perilous circumstance. Do you believe his tenders, as you call them ? Oph. I do not know, my lord, what I should think. Pol. Marry, I'll teach you : think yourself a baby : That you have ta'en these tenders for true pa}' Which are not sterling. Tender yourself more dearly: Or — not to crack the wind of the poor phrase, Running it thus — you'll tender me a fool, ( Sta ndard Version. ) 10 THE LAW IN SHAKESPEARE. "Do not believe his vows, for they are brokers, Not of that dj^e which their investments show, But mere implorators of unholy suits, Breathing like sanctified and pious bawds, The better to beguile." {Not in Quarto.) 1 did repel his letters, deny his gifts, As you did charge me. [Quarto.) I did repel his letters, and denied His access to me. [Standard Version.} For in that dreame of death, when we awake. And borne before our everlasting judge, From whence no passenger euer returned. The undiscovered countrj", at whose sight The happy smile and the accursed damn'd. [Quarto.} The undiscovered countr}^ from whose bourne No traveller returns. [Standard Version.} Yet you cannot Play upon me, besides to be demanded by a spunge. [Quarto.} Besides, to be demanded of a spunge : what replication Should be made by the son of a king ? [Standard Version.) King. Now must 3'our conscience my acquittance seal. Laer. It will appear : but tell me Why you proceeded not against these feats So crimeful and so capital in nature. [Not in Quarto.), First Clo. 1 say no, she ought not to be buried In Christian burial. , Sec. Clo. Why, sir ? First Clo. Marry, because slice's drown'd. Sec. Clo. But she did not drown e her selfe. THE LAW IN SIIAKESPEAKE. 11 Firiit Clo. No, that's certaine, the water drown'd her. Sec. Clo. Yea, but it was against her will. First Clo. No, 1 deny that ; for looke you, sir ; I stand here ; If the water come to me I drowne not my selfe ; But if 1 goe to the water, and am then drown'd, Ergo, 1 am guiltie of my owne death. Y'are gone ; goe, y'are gone, sir. Sec. Clo. 1 ; but see, she hath Christian burial Because she is a great woman. [Quarto.) First Clo. Is she to be buried in Christian burial that wil- fully seeks her own salvation ? Sec. Clo. I tell thee she is: and therefore make her grave straight : the crowner hath sat on her, and finds it Christian burial. First Clo. How can that be, unless she drowned herself in her own defence ? Sec. Clo. Why, 'tis found so. First Clo. it must be ' se offendendo ; ' it cannot be else. For here lies the point : if I drown myself wittingly, it argues an act : and an act hath three branches : it is, to act, to do, to perform : argal, she drowned herself wittingly. Sec. Clo. Nay, but hear you, goodman delver, — First Clo. Give me leave. Here lies the water; good: here stands the man ; good : if the man go to this water, and drown himself, it is, will he, nill he, he goes, — mark you that ; but if the water come to him and drown him, he drowns not him- self ; argal, he that is not guilty of his own death shortens not his own life. Sec. Clo. But is this law ? First Clo. Ay, marry, is't ; crowner's quest law. Sec. Clo. Will you ha' the truth on't ? If this had not been a gentlewoman, she should have been buried out o' Christian burial. [Standard Version.) Ham. Looke you, there's another, Horatio. Why mai't not be the scull of some Lawyer? 12 THE LAW IX SHAKESPEARE. Me tliinkes lie should indite that fellow Of an action of Batterie, for knocking Him about the pate with's shovel : now where is your Quirkes and quillets now, your vouchers and Double vouchers, your leases and free-holde And tenements ? Why that same box will scarce Hold the conveiance of his land, and must The honor lie there ? O pittifull transformance ! I prithee tell me, Horatio, Is parchment made of sheep-skinnes? Hoi\ I, u\y lorde, and of calves-skinnes too. Ham. I 'faith they proove themselves sheepe and calves That deale with them or put their trust in them. {Quarto.) Ham. There's another : why may not that be the skull of a Iaw3'er ? Where be his quiddities now, his quillets, his cases, his tenures, and his tricks ? why does he suffer this rude knave now to knock him about the sconce with a dirty shovel, and will not tell him of his action of battery? Hum ! This fellow might be in 's time a great bu\"er of land, with his stat- utes, his recognizances, his lines, his double vouchers, his re- coveries : is this the fine of his fines, and the recovery of his recoveries, to have his fine pate full of fine dirt ? will his vouchers vouch him no more of his purchases, and doul)le ones too, than the length and breadth of a pair of indentures ? The verj^ conveyances of his lands will hardl^'lie in this box ; and must the inheritor himself have no more, ha ? Hot. Not a jot more, my lord. Ham. Is not parchment made of sheep-skins? Hor. Ay, my lord, and of calf-skins too. Ham. They are sheep and calves which seek out assurance in that. {Standard Version.) Ham. An earnest conjuration from the king. As England was his faithful tributary, As love between them like the palm might flourish, As peace should still her wheaten garland wear THE LAW IN SHAKESPEARE. 13 And stand a comma 'tween their amities, And many such-like 'As'es of great charge, That, on the view and knowing of these contents, Without debatemenl further, more or less. He should the bearers put to sudden death, Not shriving-time allow'd. Hor. How was this seal'd ? Ham. Why, even in that was heaven ordinant. I had my father's signet in mv purse, Which was the model of that Danish seal ; Folded the writ up in form of the other, Subscribed it, gave't the impression, placed it safely, The changeling never known. {Not in Quarto.) Hor. No, I am more an antike Roman Than a Dane ; here is some poison left. H(im. Upon my love i charge thee let it goe. fie, Horatio, and if thou shoulds't die What a scandale woulds't thou leave behind; What tongue should tell the story of our deaths. If not from thee, {Quarto.) Ham. Had 1 but time— as this fell sergeant, Death, Is strict in his arrest — O, I could tell you — But let it be. Horatio, I am dead ; Thou livest ; report me and my cause aright To the unsatisfied. Hor. Never believe it ; 1 am more an antique lloman than a Dane ; Here is yet some liquor left. Ham. As thou'rt a man, Give me the cup : let go ; b}' heaven, I'll have't. O good Horatio, what a wounded name. Things standing thus unknown, shall live behind me ! If thou didst ever hold me in thy heart, Absent thee from felicity awhile, And in this harsh world draw th}' breath in pain. To tell my story. {Standard Version.) 14 THE LAW IN SHAKESPEARE. It thus appears that Shakespeare amplilied the statement of the compact with Fortinbras; changed Polonius' term, "a forced graunt," to a more formal and elaborate legal expressioa; inserted the word "canon" to express a divine law ; forced the word "tender" to an ampler use; called lover's oaths "bro- kers;" caught the idem so nans of. the word "borne" and changed it to "bourne" as the boundary of that undiscovered country; took the suggestion of the word "demanded" and asked what "replication" shall be made; added the request for a "sealed acquit- ance," and the demand why "capital" crimes had not been "proceeded against;" rewrote the dialogue between the clowns solely to enlarge it and make it more accurate in its legal meaning, and more relevant to the case in Plowden; reconstructed Hamlet's meditations on the lawyer's skull; cor- rected the inaccurate suggestion of an indictment for an action of battery; struck out the words "leases and free-holde and tenements;" added to the enumeration of the devices of money-lenders the words "buyer of land," "statutes," "recognizan- ces," "fines," "recoveries," — all with the greatest pains-taking to be full and accurate; added to the THE LAW IX SHAKESPEARE. 15 purport of the king's letter to England and, where Hamlet, in the quarto, merely resists Horatio's at- tempt to drink the cup by expressing a desire that he should live to tell the story, changed this to an injunction to his friend to live to report me and my cause aright To the uusatistied. By an unlearned writer such a task of correction and amplification would never have been attempted. By one who was learned in the subject, and who either delighted in it or had the tendency of prac- tice in its employment, it was inevitable that this should be done. In the scene between Hamlet and his father's ghost the effect of the "juice of cursed hebenon" is stated with much detail. This passage was also retouched, but no material change was made. No symptom or effect was added. The legal state- ments were changed throughout. But the former needed correction, for it is very inaccurate. The introduction of poison into the circulation through the porches of the ear, so that the effect will be an instantaneous incrustation of the skin, was a con- •ception of Shakespeare and has no foundation in medical science. 16 THE LAW IN SHAKESPEARE. It is especially to be noticed that this legal learn« ing is accurately sustained in many passages with cumulative and progressive application. The word employed becomes suggestive of other words, or of a legal jmnciple, and these are at once used so fully that their powers are exhausted. In one scene the lover, wishing a kiss, prays for a grant of pasture- on his mistress' lips. This suggests the law of common of pasture, and she replies that her lips are no common. This suggests the distinction be- tween tenancy in common and tenancy in severalty, the lips being several, and she adds, "though sev- eral they be." Miranda and Ferdinand simply betroth themselves; sanctimonious ceremonies are intended to follow. In the case of Florizel and Perdita the contract before witnesses is proposed, but the disguised father interrupts the proceed- ings and prevents a marriage. In the case of Mariana there is a contract of marriage, followed by consummation in the legal and physical sense,, and it is not even suggested that this is not a valid marriage. In describing the wager of battle everything is correctly and orderly set forth. The appeal is made ; gloves are thrown down and taken THE LAW IN SHAKESPEARE. 17 up; the lists are set upon the green ; proclamation is made; the judges take their places; the king stops the combat by throwing down his warder. The regularity of the process in Shylock v. Anto- nio is fully pointed out elsewhere. The trial of Queen Catherine opens with a j)roposition to read the commissions of the judges, citation is made, her appearance is demanded, and she refuses it, be- cause to appear will be a submission to the juris- diction of the court. This is precisely the ground upon which Mary Stuart stood at her trial, and so insurmountable did her prosecutors deem it to be, that she was cajoled into doing that which Catherine refused. The barbarous penalty of Shylock's bond is a reminiscence of the Twelve Tables, by which the creditors of a delinquent debtor were allowed to cut him into pieces. The Italian novel upon which the play is founded attributes the same penalty to the bond. So does the old ballad of Gernutus. It has been contended that the ballad is the offspring of the play, but incorrectly, because the former contains nothing concerning any woman as a judge, — a circumstance too effective to have been omitted by any ballad maker who drew his in- 9, 18 THE LAW IN SHAKESPEARE. spiration from the play. When Hamlet surmises that the skull may be that of a lawyer, a lender of money, he enumerates at once the methods by which loans were secured. The words "factor" and "broker" are used with perfect understanding of the technical differences in their meaning. Tamora claims her Eoman citizenship through her incorpo- ration into a Eoman family under the principle of adoption by marriage. Lear partitions his king- dom, and delivers it by livery of seizin. He entails the crown by apt words. Hermione is accused of adultery, and therefore of treason, according to the statute of Edward HI. The validity of the acts of a king de facto and the duty of obedience to him are stated with the most precise understanding of the distinction between officers de facto and those de jure. Helena is a feudal ward. Cade makes a bes- tial pun, suggested by tenancy in capite, and by an infernal privilege of stupration, which is one of the recondite curiosities of the law. Dromio asserts that there is no time for a bald man to recover his hair. This having been written, the law phrase suggested itself, and he was asked whether he might not do it by fine and recovery, and this sug- THE LAAV IX SHAKESPEARE. 19 gested the efficiency of that proceeding to bar heirs; a.nd this started the conceit that thus the lost hair of another man would be recovered. A 'quest of thoughts all tenants to the heart is impaneled to decide the question of title to the visage of the beloved one between the heart and the eye, where the defendant denies the plea, and the verdict is a moiety to each. The remembrance of things past is summoned up to the sessions of sweet, silent thought. These illustrations have been given as they oc- cur to the memory from hundreds of passages to enforce the argument of the probative force of ac- cumulated circumstances from diverse sources, when there can be no doubt of the circumstances themselves. There is no question here of fabri- cated evidence. While the simulation of evidence by perverting or inventing circumstances is a de- vice of all fabricators from the time of the exhibi- tion of Joseph's coat to Jacob, the noting the mole on Imogen's snow-pure breast, the smearing by Lady Macbeth of the grooms' faces with blood, and the use of the handkerchief by lago, are done with legal craft, and form Shakespeare's judgment upon 20 THE LAW IN SHAKESPEARE. what is called circumstantial evidence, which after all the judicial cant upon the subject, such as the assertion that circumstances cannot lie, can be made the most illusory of all testimony ; for while circumstances cannot lie, they can be feigned, in- vented, distorted, half-stated, misapplied, mistaken,, or lied about with most infernal skill. It is upon circumstantial evidence so misunderstood that the claims of all impostors have been maintained from the falsi Neronis ludibrio which moved the hosts of Parthia to the pretensions of the claimant in the Tichborne case. The least mistake makes all the difference in the world. Suppose, for instance, that in the perspective of ages events should be so foreshortened that the years which cover Shake- speare's life-time and that of Milton should blend^ it might be argued from the extracts from Comus, which are hereinafter set out, from an assump- tion that Shakespeare was an obscure and illit- erate man, and from Milton's commanding intel- lectual force and erudition, that the latter wrote the plays in that heyday of his youth when, ac- cording to his own statement, he delighted in the sinuosi pompa theatri; or it might be maintained THE LAW IN SHAKESPEARE. 21 with nearly equal force that Shakespeare wrote Areopagitica or Paradise Lost in his later years, after he had forsaken the vanities of his youth, had become devout, and had thrown all the forces of his mighty intellect into the polemics incident to a great political and religious revolution. These •considerations are also relevant to what it is in- tended to submit relative to the theory that Francis Bacon was Shakespeare. We can apply here the tests which decide our ordinar}^ actions, and which in courts are found sufficient to adjudicate the most momentous ques- tions. In the daily conduct of our lives we act upon the results of a calculation of probabilities. We frequently make it for ourselves, but as to our habitual actions it was made for us, perhaps thou- sands of years ago, and its results constitute what we call experience. In any such case, it is found from observation that a certain series of events is followed by certain consequences, so tliat an aggre- gate of circumstances being given we assume that but one result can follow. So unvarying are such results that, for all practical purposes, they are cer- 22 THE LAW IN SHAKESPEARE. tainties. These experiences form the path in which we traverse life. They guide our business conduct. They map the course of storms upon the sea. They know where planets will shine, what eclipses will occur, what comets will return, for all time to come. It is thus that order is introduced into what is ap- parently inextricable confusion, and relationship is established between subjects separated by vast intervals of time and space. This is the great triumph of comparative philology which demon- strated the affinity of languages, traced diverse peoples to a common origin, and went far to mark the stages of their progress from the table lands of Asia through all the centuries from the morning of time. From this the unity of many nations was deduced, and a substantial identity of their religious conceptions, primal laws and domestic habits be- came established facts. All this is the result of what Whewell calls the "consilience of inductions." One fact seldom proves much beyond itself, but two facts may prove a third, and when among a hun- dred or a thousand separate facts, each shows a re- lation, not dependent on another but independent of it, to all the rest, and also a relation to some: THE LAAV IX SHAKESPEARE. 23 other fact not susceptible of actual observation, but which is the object to be demonstrated; when each fact points to one cause or result, and to no other; when an analysis of the elements of each fact shows the same unvarying convergence to one point; when any one fact may be removed from any function in the process and the result remain the same; when research and addition to the mass of circumstances, instead of displacing its probative direction only renders it more steady, — the certainty that the object which they indicate is the solution of the question becomes so great that the most sti^i- pendous figures are inadequate to express the in- fallibility of the result. Every one remembers the problem of the blacksmith who engaged to shoe a horse for one cent for the first nail, two cents for the next, four cents for the next, and so on, doub- ling the preceding number for each nail until all the nails should be computed for. The result is an illustration of the high power of proof to w^iich the accumulated and progressive force of many circum- stances can be raised. It is true that one positively established fact, out of many, which points con- clusively to another result, may entirely invalidate THE LAW IX SHAKESPEARE. the demonstration, and this is the fallacy of circum- stantial evidence as it is commonly understood to be. The witness may be false, he may be mis- taken, he may not be clear, he may unintentionally pervert or suppress something. But in matters of textual criticism, such as are now under considera- tion, there is no possibility of such perturbations. I regard Paley's Horae Paulinae as one of the most helpful books that a law student can read. It trains him for the most strenuous dialectics of his profession. Paley's thesis is that all the epistles which the canon attributes to St. Paul were written by one man, and with a power of analysis and ap- plication of proofs which has never been surpassed, he proves it by citing examj)les from each epistle of undesigned coincidences, minute, obscure, latent, and oblique, which abound throughout the Pauline writings. He says "they form no continued story; they compose no regular correspondence ; the}' com- prise not the transactions of any particular period; they carry on no connection of argument ; the}- de- pend not upon one another; no study or care has been employed to preserve the appearance of con- sistency amongst them; they w^ere not intended by THE LAW IX SHAKESPEAllE. 25 the person, whoever he was, that wrote them to come forth or he read together; they appeared at first separately and have heen collected since." If these tests are applied to the hooks of the Evangel- ists, it will appear, upon the most cursory examina- tion, that they were each written hy a different man. Some of the most interesting discoveries in astro- nomical science have heen predicted 03^ the applica- tion of the calculus of prohahilities. For instance, Michell, in 1767, noticed that many fixed stars had companions close to them. Such a conjunction as to one or two stars would have no probative force, for they might beat a great distance from each other and lie on the same line of sight. But this optical union was so apparent in many stars that he asserted the existence of a bond between most of the double stars. Struve computed the odds to be 9,570 to 1 that any two stars of not less than the seventh mag- nitude could fall within the apparent distance of four minutes of each other by chance, and yet ninety-one of such cases had been observed when his computation was made, and many more have been since discovered. There were also four known triple stars, and the odds against the casual con- 26 THE LAW IN SHAKESPEARE. junction of these were 173,524 to 1. Michell's conjecture was verified nearly a century after it was made by the discovery that many of the double stars are directly connected with each other under the law of gravitation. Nearly all of the planetary movements have sim- ilarity of direction. In the time of Laplace eleven planets were known, and the directions were known for the sun, six planets, the satellites of Jupiter,. Saturn's ring, and one of his satellites. There were thus known forty-three concurring motions; that is, the orbital motions of eleven planets and eight- een satellites and fourteen axial rotations. The probability that this number of independent mo- tions should coincide by chance is as an odds of about 4,400,000,000,000 to 1. The application of the doctrine of probabilities to the argument that Shakespeare was learned in the law is manifest. The nature of the subject, of course, makes the odds inexpressible by numerical notation. But the principle of increment of proba- tive force is the same here as in the case of the vis- ible and ponderable bodies, concerning which Struve and Laplace made their computations. THE LAAV IX SHAKESPEARE. 27 Suppose that within the last year all of these writings had been collected from scattered sources ; some from libraries and family archives in England ; some from old repositories in Massachusetts and Virginia. The authorship by one person or by many persons being the question, what testimony could be more convincing that they were written by one man than these undesigned, unstudied, obscure, oblique, latent, and cumulative legal expressions which occur in each play ? This being settled, the next question would be what manner of man was he who produced this in- comparable body of thought and imagination? Was he merely a man of letters, or was he also a physician, or a lawyer, or a soldier ? The same pro- cess of induction can be employed. It is found that the test of the use of technical phrases is applicable. It is found that they abound. Their use is accurate, unstudied, cumulative, incidental, undesigned for any purpose except their special employment in the places where they occur; is so subtle in illustra- tive function, as often to require special research to apply it; that the productions in which they oc- cur form no continued story ; that they were orig- "28 THE LAW IN SHAKE.^PEARE. inally separate productions ; that many of them were not published at all in the life -time of the author, but were handed out to actors to be learnt ; that they cover the term of a long literary life ; that they do not comprise the transactions of any one period; that they carry on no connection of argument, nor do they depend upon one another; that they ex- hibit no such familiarity with other arts, sciences, or vocations, but that as to them they are full of errors and carelessness. All this makes out a case by demonstration so absolute that no hypoth- esis is left except that the writer was learned in the law. The most persuasive argument concerning the authorship of the letters of Junius is the familiarity which they display with the routine of the war ofitice, in which Francis was employed. Chatterton hoaxed profound scholars by his wonderful simulation of coincidences and archaisms, apparently unde- signed, and was detected by the inaccuracies which cannot be avoided in any such attempt. Sir John Coleridge' broke down the Tichborne claimant by a cross-examination which proved his ignorance of facts, or the details of events, which must have been known to him had he been what he pretended to be. THE LAW IN SHAKESPEARE. 29" The dyer's hand is always subdued to what it works in. Professor Greenleaf examined the tes- timony of the Evangelists by the rules of evidence administered in courts of justice. That St. Mat- thew was a native Jew, familiar with the opinions, ceremonies, and customs of his countrymen, con- versant with their sacred writings, and of little learning except what he derived from them, he holds to be established by the internal evidence of his gos- pel. That St. Mark wrote at Eome for the use of the Gentile converts, he argues from the numerous Lat- inisms which he employs and from the explanations he gives, which would be useless to a Jew. That St. Luke was a physician, he maintains, is apparent from his gospel, which shows that he was an acute observer, who had given particular and even profes- sional attention to all of our Savior's miracles of healing; that where Matthew and Mark describe a man simply as a leper, he writes that he was full of leprosy; that he whom they mention as having a withered hand is described by him as having his right hand withered; that he alone, with a physi- cian's accuracy, says that the virtue went out of Jesus and healed the sick; that he alone relates 30 THE LAW IN SHAKESPEARE. the fact that the sleep of the disciples in Gethse- mane was induced by excessive sorrow, and attrib- utes the blood-like sweat of our Kedeemer to the intensity of His agony, and that he alone relates the miraculous healing of Malchus' ear. It has been maintained that the company of play- ers to which Shakespeare belonged visited Scotland in the autumn of 1601, and that they were at Aber- deen in October of that year. It has been argued that Shakespeare in Macbeth displays a knowledge of the topography of the country around Forres and of the local superstitions and traditions, so much beyond any information given in Holinshed's Chronicle, that he must have accompanied the play- ers, and it must be admitted that a most plausible showing is made. This branch of the argument can best be en- forced by the words of an eminent text-writer on the law of evidence : "In estimating the force of a number of circum- stances tending to the proof of the disputed fact, it is of essential importance to consider whether they be dependent or independent. If the facts A, B,