Book__^AjT_ REPORT on the Condition of the Public Records of the State of New Jersey by a Committee of Citizens to the LEGISLATURE, SESSION OF 1917 TRENTON, N. J. MacCrellish & Quigley Co., State Printers IQI7 • . REPORT on the Condition of the Public Records of the State of New Jersey by a NewT^t Committee of Citizens to the LEGISLATURE, SESSION OF 1917 v TRENTON, N. J. MacCrellish & Quigley Co., State Printers IQI7 D. of D. APR 18 191 7 To the Members of the New Jersey Legislature: Gentlemen — The undersigned, a committee of citizens of New Jersey interested in the preservation and retrievement of the public records, have the honor to submit their Report on the Condition of the Public Records of the State of New Jersey and Municipalities Thereof. It is based upon original investiga- tions instituted by this Committee, and prepared free of public expense. The report covers a large subject in a general way, briefly stating many pertinent facts in relation thereto, so that the whole can be quickly grasped. (3) THE REPORT. Intelligence has no. doubts as to the .great importance of pro- tecting and preserving public records. Public records are memory in the concrete. They are the links of civilization through the ages. European Archives. For centuries nearly every European country has systematically preserved its public records. In England, especially, will be found the British Museum and the Public Record Office, containing records for a thousand years, which are so accurately arranged as to be available easily for either historical purposes or as evi- dence in court. American Archives. In the United States no methodical plan of archives for public documents was inaugurated during the first century of its ex- istence. Rhode Island, Connecticut, Vermont, Maryland, North Caro- lina, South Carolina, Georgia, Wisconsin, Illinois and other States have in the years since the first centennial of our nation enacted legislation for the safeguarding and restoration of public records. The States of Massachusetts, New York, Pennsylvania, West Vir- ginia, Alabama. Mississippi and others have especially illumined the way in this necessary work by establishing either a Depart- ment of 'Archives or a Department of Public Records. For more than a quarter of a century the Bay State has continued the work, until now its records of the past are almost wholly retrieved and methods are ordered by law protecting records in the making and the keeping, from the smallest hamlet to the greatest of municipal departments; and this undertaking has (5) been more recently and successfully followed in the States of New York and Connecticut. In this endeavor they are but re- sponding to an impulse common and natural to all people as the years of their maturity lengthen. Of all the States of the Union, New Jersey has premier cause and greatest need for care in protecting its records of the past, and in safeguarding the making of its records now and for the future. Condition of the Public Records of New Jersey. The innumerable details associated with this broad subject can be more readily and intelligently grasped by speaking of them in terms of generality, and furnishing specific illustrations under appropriate titles. Retained State Papers. It is a matter of serious concern to know that, with respect to the ancient records of New Jersey, there exist to-day in the State House thousands of pieces of original manuscripts scattered here and there in boxes or tied up in bundles and otherwise, receiving practically no* care or attention, and which are more or less accessible to the marauder. Necessarily they are not accessible for public inspection ; nor have they been collated or calendared, but a superficial examination of them demonstrates their historical value, pertaining as they do< to most. every phase of the government and of the development of New Jersey from 1676 to 1825, and later. Abstracted Records. One of the most alarming features connected with our ancient records has been their abstraction, a practice which has been in vogue for more than a century; and our investigations show that a large portion of them are now possessed and controlled by private interests, to the exclusion of the citizens of this State who are by law entitled to a gratuitous examination of them for legitimate purposes. On their face these papers are Public Documents of New Jer- sey, and constitute part of our most precious and valuable treas- ures. These missing documents consist in part of cuch manu- scripts of exceptional value as the royal grants — leases and releases — of the territory and government of the Province of New Jersey and of East and West Jersey, respectively; the quintipartite deed dividing- the province into East and West Jer- sey ; the concessions and agreements between the proprietors and inhabitants of West Jersey ; and the instrument surrender- ing, the powers of government of the Proprietors to the Crown in 1702. The remainder of the manuscripts missing are chiefly the royal instructions to the governors; messages of the governors to the general assembly; journals of the governor and council, and of the general assembly; petitions and memorials to the gov- ernor, and to the legislative assembly ; correspondence and official letter books of the governors; journals of the provincial con- gress, petitions, memorials and other miscellaneous papers con- nected therewith; journals of the first constitutional convention; minutes and dockets of the various courts; town and township records ; boundary line papers ; muster and pay rolls, and other military papers ; vital statistics ; church records ; and a variety of miscellaneous papers and records of historical importance incident to the established government, and to the social and economic condition of the people, extending from 1664 down to the early portion of the nineteenth century. A selection of these missing papers will be found calendared in Appendix A. Cause of Abstraction. The abstraction of our ancient records from the various de- partments of the State government, and from the municipalities thereof, is not a new discovery. It may be traced to three dis- tinct causes. 8 First. In the time of the past, the public records of New Jer- sey were regarded by their proper custodians as the private prop- erty of the individual holding office, because, under the fee sys- tem, he was required to purchase all of his stationery ; and for this reason many records and official papers were retained by the retiring official from office. This was the personal observa- tion of Mr. William A. Whitehead, and by him publicly expressed as early as 1854. (N. J. Hist. Society Proceedings, 1st Series, Vol. VII, p, 88; see Id. Vol. IX, p. 5.) Second. There can be no question but that many of the public records were also obtained by persons through the medium of the courteous public officials, and otherwise acquired by them under the lax system which then— and now to some extent — - prevailed in many of the public repositories, occasioned in part by the overcrowded condition of the record vaults. The easy manner in which many papers of historical interest were procur- able in the by-gone days is exemplified by the number that can now be found filed with the revolutionary pension claims of Jerseymen in the Pension Bureau at Washington. Third. There lis ample evidence to show that many very valu- able records were obtained by persons after they had been cast away from their proper places by their indifferent and careless custodians. This practice is clearly pointed out in a statement made by the late William Nelson in the "Pater son Guardian" for March 10, 191 3, when favoring the passage of a pending legislative measure providing" for the preservation of our public records, which, in part, read : "There is need for something of the kind. The care- lessness regarding the old records of counties, townships and even cities is deplorable. When the Passaic county records were moved to the new court house a number of older books \vere thrown away. I found among them the original record book of Saddle River township and have it yet. Sometimes the descent of estates depends upon these records. Yet they are thrown away as of no value by people who either do not take the trouble to 9 inquire about their importance or do not care if they do know. "The same thing happened in Essex count)- and I sup- pose it has everywhere. By and by a case will come up in the courts that needs the information maintained in these records to secure the rights of an individual, or a family. Meantime they have been destroyed, as I have outlined. "I believe this bill is a necessity, and outlines a method by which such difficulties will be prevented in the future. DISPOSITION OF ABSTRACTED PAPERS. Usually the abstracted archives referred to are kept intact in certain families for generations ; sometimes they are divided among them, and by- them given away to individuals, historical and geneological societies within and beyond the State, or sold at auction in the larger cities of the United States. They have otherwise been disposed of by will to private interests ; abstracted in bulk and offered for sale ; and in rare instances they have inadvertently reverted back to the State, and have been otherwise acquired by consent, by purchase, and by demand. These varied conditions are briefly illustrated as follows : PAPERS RETAINED IN PRIVATE FAMILIES. The original grants — leases and releases — given by James, Duke of York, for the territory and government of the Province of New Jersey, and of East and West Jersey, respectively, ac- companied with near two hundred kindred papers, are now pos- sessed by a certain family residing in an adjoining State, as is the quintepartite deed for the division of the province into East and West Jersey. A celandar of a few of these papers will more particularly illustrate their value : Original lease for a year from James, Duke of York', to Lords Berkley and Carteret, for the whole of New Jersey, dated June 23, 1664. IO Original release of the same, June 24, 1664. Original lease for a year from James, Duke of York, to Sir George Carteret for half of northern New Jersey, dated July 28, 1674. Original release of the same, July 29, 1674. Original instructions from Sir George Carteret for the government of his province, July 31, 1674. Original quintepartite deed between Sir George Car- teret, Win Penn, Nicholas Lucas, Gawen Lawrie and Edward Bylling'e, dated July 1, 1676, dividing the prov- ince into East and West Jersey. Original release of Elizabeth Carteret, widow and executrix, and the trustees of Sir George, to the first Twelve Proprietors for all of East Jersey, dated January 1, 1681-2. Original release of James, Duke of York, to- Edward Byllinge, Wm. Penn, Sawen Lawrie, Nicholas Lucas, John Eldridge and Edmund Warner, for West Jersey, dated August 6, 1680. Original deed from William Penn to Robert Barclay, for i/24th of East Jersey, dated September 22, 1682. Original order of the Proprietors relative to laying- out of lands, and censuring Governors Law r rie and Rud- yard for their manner of doing it, dated July 3, 1685. Revocation of all Governor Lawrie' s powers by order of the Proprietors, 1687. The deed from James, Duke of York, for West Jersey, dated August 6, 1680, and "The Concessions and Agreements of the proprietors, freeholders and inhabitants of West Jersey," bear- ing date March 3, 1675-6, was a few years ago possessed by a certain person residing in New Jersey. More than a century and a quarter ago a certain official of one of the most important record offices of the State abstracted nearly all the records of his office upon his retirment therefrom ; and his successor did likewise when he withdrew some sixteen years later. These papers are now held intact by their respec- tive descendants residing in New Jersey. The records of the II first official referred to have 'been examined by a member of this committee. They contain matter of rare historical interest, but they were too numerous for us to calendar. They are packed away loosely and otherwise in boxes and trunks in sufficient quantity to load a single wagon. The present head of the family expresses a willingness to turn them over to the State authorities should anyone be duly authorized to receive them. There is said to be a large collection of State documents be- longing to a family previously of New Jersey in storage in a neighboring city, which will probably be offered for sale at auction in the near future. The advice comes from a reliable source, but for prudent reasons no specific inquiry has been made of them •PRIVATE DONATION OF RECORDS. In the course of research we have been enabled to obtain many lists of valuable State papers which have been donated. by per- sons to certain individuals and other private interests, a selec- tion of which will be found calendared under Appendix A. It is noteworthy to mention that some of them have been possessed by Virginia families, and that the famous Answer to the Eliza- bethtown Bill in Chancery was given to a certain geneological society. DISPOSITION OP RECORDS BY WILL. One of the most remarkable instances coming to our knowl- edge in the disposition of public records is one in which a certain prominent citizen of the State, who, after disposing to a certain person by his last will and testament — duly probated — ''many documents relating to the general history cnf the State, ilts settlement, &c." (evidently State papers), bequeathed to certain private interests "my bound volumes of manuscripts lettered 'Xev Jersey Manuscripts,' 'Boundary Papers,' original 'Minutes of the Provincial Congress,' 'Minutes of the Legislature,' and other Xew Jersey miscellaneous documents that may not be 12 especially desired by menibers of my family; '* * *." The "Minutes of the Legislature'' more specifically refers to the original manuscript Journals of the General Assembly for the years 1751-1752; 1777, 1778, 1779; 1 780-1 781 ; -1782-1874; 1 786- 1 788- 1 790; 1 806- 1 808. ACQUISITION OF RECORDS. In 1870 the late Hon. Garret D. W. Vroom, by mere chance, obtained several invaluable manuscript records from a negro man-servant of a deceased statesman, who was ignorant of their value, and who found them in clearing up the house and office of his late employer in Trenton. They consisted of the Journal of the Governor and Council of East Jersey from December 1, 1682, to April 29, 1703 ; Minutes of the Assembly from Novem- ber 10, 1703, to January 31, 17 10; and the Journal of the Council of Safety in 1 777-1 778. They had been in private pos- session for no one knows how long, and upon their recovery they were immediately deposited in the State Library by Judge Vroom. ACQUISITION OF RECORDS BY CONSENT. Some eight years ago Dr. Carlos E. Godfrey, in pursuit of his official duties, discovered a -quantity of original muster rolls of New Jersey troops in the Revolutionary War in possession of the state authorities of Massachusetts at Boston. Upon repre- sentations made to the Executive of that Commonwealth, the lat- ter induced the Legislature to consent to their return to the State of New Jersey, ACQUISITION OE RECORDS BY PURCHASE. On April 6, 1910, by direction of Governor Fort, the Docket of the Supreme Court of the Colony of New Jersey from 1763 to 1770, and the Docket of the Burlington County Court from June Term, 1765, to October Term, 1772, were purchased at public auction in New York City. 13 Again, from another auction house in New York, on June 17, 19 1 3, was purchased by direction of Governor Fielder the original Minutes of the Governor and Council from September 26 to October 26, 1770, and from March 11 to May 16, 1774; besides many other interesting and valuable manuscript State documents of Xew Jersey. ACQUISITION OF RECORDS BY DEMAND. About 1873, Colonel James S. Kiger, formerly of the Ad- jutant-General's Office, discovered an immense quantity of origi- nal military papers and other kindred records at the residence of a former State official, then deceased, who had abstracted them from the files of his office. Upon demand they were surrendered to the State. AM thou t being more definite, some years ago upon the death of a certain prominent State official, the vaults of his record office were ransacked after business hours by certain persons having access thereto, for the purpose of gathering together what they conceived were the private papers of the deceased. Subse- quently, however, one of the principal auction houses in a neighboring city issued a catalogue for circulation, containing a calendar of the individual manuscripts alleged to belong to the estate of the deceased official, wiith an announced date of their sale. ' Nearly every item offered for sale in the catalogue showed upon its face that the original was a State Document. In abundance were to be found such important documents as the original Minutes of the Council and General Assembly ; Messages of the Governors ; Petitions to the General Assembly : and other innumerable papers and records belonging directly to the deced- ent's public office of the greatest historical importance. Upon the personal demand of the Governor on the executors of this estate for the immediate return of these papers to the State House, near two* thousand priceless records were restored to the archives of the State. It is fair to sav, however, that it is not 14 believed that the official referred to ever claimed ownership to the papers in question. Within the last two years another large collection of New Jersey State documents of unusual historical value was adver- tised to be sold by a certain auction house in New York City, alleged to belong to the estate of a prominent citizen # of New Jersey. Following the precedent established in the former case, Governor Fielder instructed the Attorney-General to demand their immediate return to the State House, or upon failure there- of to institute proceedings for their recovery. Through this agency the collection was promptly surrendered and delivered in Trenton to the attorney specially retained to enforce their return A selection of some of the most important papers of the few thousand that have either been offered for sale or sold at public auction within the past fifteen years have been calendared in Appendix B, to illustrate their general character. Abstraction of Special, Documents, collections of the secretary of state. In the Harvard University Library will be found, in the "Sparks' Collection," a series of transcripts made in June, 1826, by Jared Sparks, the historian, selectee! from originals then in the Office of the Secretary of State of New Jersey, of which the following is the inventory — indicating that these papers were then in the possession oi the State : "Memorial of The New Jersey brigade, Apr. 17, 1779. Letters from Washington, 1 777-1 780; 1782, 1783. Let- ters from Gen. Heath, Robert Morris, Franklin, Henry Laurens. Proceedings of a Commission, Mar. 26, 1777, etc., to regulate the. price of labor. Declaration of Maryland, 1778. Convention at Hartford, 1780. Secretary of Congress, Aug. 24, 1785, to the Governor of New Jersey. Letters of Abraham Clark, 1780, 1781. Correspondence of Washington and William Maxwell, U79- Letters from New Jersey troops, 1779. Letters of William C. Houston (1780); John Fell (1779) ; Nathaniel Scudder (1778) ; Washington (1777) ; Elias Boudinot (1777) ; and Daniel Colman (1777)." It is scarcely necessary to say that none of the originals in the above list of documents can now be found anywhere in the State's possession. Livingston's correspondence. In 1848, by authority of a joint resolution of the Legislature approved March 9th, of that year, a publication was issued, enti- tled "Selections from the Correspondence of the Executive of New Jersey from 1776 to 1786.'' It necessarily contained the correspondence from and to William Livingston, Governor of New Jersey from 1776 to 1790. The published Senate Journal for January 17, 1848, as doej the resolution itself, shows that the originals of this correspond- ence were then located both in the State Library and the Office of the Secretary of State. But, like the collection of manuscripts which Jared Sparks copied in the latter office in 1826, the origi- nals have disappeared from the archives of the State. The col- lection was undoubtedly abstracted from the State, and after- wards disintegrated as evidenced by the fact that the original let- ters from Jonathan D. Sergeant to the Speaker of the Assembly, dated Baltimore, February 6, 1777, and from Abraham Clark to the Speaker of the Assembly, dated Baltimore, February 8,. ,777 — represented in the publication referred to at pages 24 and 25, respectively — now form part of the "Emmet Collection of Manu- scripts" in the New York Public Library and respectively known as items No. 795 and No. 2862. However, in January, i860, the original correspondence of Governor Livingston's, then bound in seven large folio volumes and containing about one thousand letters, was offered for sale i6 to certain interests in New Jersey by Mr. C, B. Norton, of New- York City. Subsequently, Mr. Norton disposed of the collec- tion to Mr. Samuel L. M. Barlow, of New York; and after the death of the latter, it was acquired by a wealthy gentleman resid- ing in New Jersey through a public sale effected in the American Art Galleries, in the City of New York, on February 8, 1890, for the sum of $240.00. The auctioneer's catalogue described The Livingston Correspondence, in part, in the following lan- guage : "This famous collection of over 1,000 Letters, Peti- tions, &s., for the most part addressed to William Livings- ton, while he held the position of Governor of New Jersey, is generally of an official character, the earliest, 1775, the latest, 1782, * * *. The whole carefully mounted and bound in 8 folio volumes, half Russia (in a wooden case), including a complete Index and Digest of the whole." Without seeing this collection of manuscripts, it is impossible to say whether, it is composed of the same identical papers of Governor Livingston's which was possessed by the State in 1848. It is sufficient to say, however, that when Chief Justice Green saw Mr. Norton's collection in January, i860, he expressed a decided personal opinion that they were part of the official correspondence of a Governor of New Jersey, and necessarily constituted a por- tion of the archives of the State (See N. J. Hist. Society Pro- ceedings, i%t Series, Vol. IX, p. 5). MINUTES OF THE PROVINCIAL CONGRESS. The original Minutes of the Provincial Congress of New Jersey in 1775 and 1776, once possessed by the State, were given away to certain private interests by the last will and testa- ment of a gentleman probated many years ago. Some sixty years ago the original memorials, petitions and other communications presented to the Provincial Congress were possessed by a particular family in Virginia, who then turned them over to certain private interests in New Jersey, where they now remain. Other papers presented before the Provincial Congress in 1775 and 1776 were offered for sale at auction in New York in No* vember, 191 5, but upon the demand of Governor Fielder they were surrendered to the State. JOURNALS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION. The manuscript -journals of the convention which framed the first Constitution of Xew Jersey in 1776, previously possessed by the State, are now in the custody and control of certain private interests. REVOLUTIONARY MILITARY ROLLS. Bv the language expressed in Joint Resolution No. VI, ap- proA-ed March 9, 1881 (Laws of 1881, p. 307), the muster and pay rolls of the troops of New Jersey in the revolutionary war were loaned by the State authorities to the general government at Washington, for the purpose of verifying the claims against the United States for pension and bounty lands, and were never returned to the State. OTHER WAR ROLLS. In a certain geneological society of one of the New England States will be found several cavalry rolls of New Jersey troops engaged in the Pensylvania Whiskey Insurrection in 1794. They consist of the Pay Roll of the Field and Staff and the Major's command of the 2d New Jersey Cavalry; the Pay Rolls of Captains Henry . nderveer's and William Steel's troops: and the Muster Roll of Captain Bernard Hanlon's troop from Tren- ton; which, of course belongs to the State of New Jersev. In another State will be found a mass of original rolls of New Jersey troops for the year 171 5, and on the face of them they are State property. They consist of the Muster Rolls of Colonel Thomas Farmer's Militia Regiment, comprising seven companies, with a record of 579 officers and men; the Muster Roll of 2 REC i8 Captain Joseph Seeley's Company "ye South Side of Cohansey, November the 16 Anno Dom 171 5," comprising 74 officers and men ; the Muster Roll of Captain Daniel Rumsey's Company "in ye county of Salem," comprising 134 officers and men; the Muster Roll of Captain John Lloyd's Company "In Piles Grove in ye County of Salem/' comprising 59 officers and men; the Muster Roll of Captain Enloye's Company, from Penns Neck, Salem County, comprising! 75 officers and men; and the Muster Roll of Lieutenant Thomas Maskell's Company, comprising 85 officers and men. LEGISLATIVE PROCEEDINGS. The First Report of the Public Record Commission, published in 1899, contains the following paragraph on page 4: "Your Commissioners desire to call especial attention to the remarkable fact that there does not exist in New Jer- sey a complete set of the laws of the Colony, Province and State; nor is there known to exist anywhere a com- plete record of the Legislative proceedings from 1665." With respect to the Legislative Proceedings on page 21 of this report the Commission say: "The Proceedings of the various Legislative bodies of New Jersey during the Proprietary or Colonial period appear in all sorts of out-of-the-way places : In the records of the Freehold or Middletown Town Meetings ; in the records of the Monmouth County Court of Common Right; in the records of the courts of Cape May, Salem, Bur- lington and Woodbury; in the records of the Supreme Court, at Trenton; in the Book of Patents and Deeds, in the office of the Secretary of State at Trenton, and perhaps elsewhere." This statement is subsequently followed by a Bibliography of the Printed Proceedings of the Provincial Assembly from 17 10 .to 1776, which shows that the Proceedings for the following dates are not possessed by the State in the State l Library : Dec. 6, 1 710, to Feb. 10, 1710-11. July 6, 1711, to July 16, 171 1. Dec. 7, 1713, to Mar. 17, 1714. 19 Nov. 27, 1 716, to Jan. 26/1 716-7. Apr. 8, 1 718, to Apr. 12, 1718. Jan. 13, 1719, to Mar. 28, 1719. Mar. 7, 1722, to May 5, 1722. May 25, 1725, to Aug. 23, 1725. Dec. 9, 1727, to Feb. 10, 1728. Dec. 12, 1728, to Jan. 9, 1728-9. May 7, 1730, to July 8, 1730. Apr. 10, 1740, to July 31, 1740. *Oct. 2, 1741, to Nov. 4, 1 741. ♦Oct. 10, 1743, to Dec. 10, 1743. Oct. 9, 1746, to Nov. 1, 1746. May 4, 1747, to May 9, 1747. Oct. 21, 1748, to Dec. 16, 1748. Sept. 25, 1749, to Oct. 20, 1749. June 3, 1754, to June 21, 1754. Apr. 24, 1755, to Apr. 26, 1755. *Mar. 9, 1756, to Mar. 16, 1756. ♦Oct. ic, 1757, to Oct. 22, 1757. (* Imperfect copies.) This condition of our legislative proceedings creates a strong suspicion that many of these records were in the past abstracted from the collection intended to be kept by the State. Copy of many of these missing proceedings can be found in the Public Record Office in London, while others are to be found in certain public repositories in this country. Condition of Municipal Records. It was manifestly beyond the province of this Committee to investigate the condition of the public records contained in more than five hundred political divisions of the State. What we have said relative to the "Cause of Abstraction" of our ancient State records, page 5, applies with equal force to the municipal records. 20 LEGISLATIVE EXPOSURE. The congested conditions, and the loss and destruction of many of our municipal records, have been exposed by the Legis- lature in ,the preambles to Chapter 190 of the Laws of 1883 (page 236), and Chapter 105 of the Laws of 1897 (page 193). In other legislative acts provision has been made from time to time for the preservation of maps and other records which have become obscure or mutilated by use (Laws 1889, p. 49; Id., p. 64; Laws 1902, p. 236; Laws 191 5, p. 167). Editorial Exposure. The editor of The Philadelphia Record, in the columns of his paper for May 31, 1915,. broadly states the deplorable condition of all public records in the following language : ' 'There is something peculiarly American in the con- dition of affairs revealed by the effort of the State of New Hampshire to prevent the sale in this city of in- teresting Revolutionary letters and papers which it claims were taken from the State archives. Whether they were or not, there can be no doubt that it is true, as charged, that there has been the most shocking and inexcusable carelessness shown in the preservation of records, Na- tional, State and municipal, in practically every part of the country. Documents of great historic interest and value have been given away, stolen, sold or cast off as junk because the men supposed to> look after them 1 were too ; ignorant to know their importance or too dishonest to safeguard them. This is shown by the repeated ap- pearance in sales of letters, papers or records which are really official and which belong to the people as a whole. When they have passed into private hands it has generally been through crookedness or ignorant indifference to duty. "With the greater interest now taken in State and local historical matters it is probable that this dishonest 21 practice is much less common than it was, but evil has already been done. Priceless papers relating to the revo- lution and colonial history have been lost, and many be- longing to the Civil War era are constantly turning up in private collections. This is all indicative of a very crude and imperfect civilization. Collectors are largely to blame, and after them the negligent custodians. It is to be hoped that in the twentieth century we will show more intelligence and honesty in the matter." The editors of some of the leading newspapers of the State have expressed themselves, in part, as follows : The Jersey (City) Journal, March 13, ipi 3: "At present there is no place where old records can be kept, and many of them have been lost or thrown away as rubbish. "This is true mainly of local municipal records, and in no sec- tion has the damage from ignorance or carelessness been more felt than in Jersey City, where many of the old minute books and other records have been lost." The Sunday Call, Feb. 27, 19 16: "The true and complete story of this State cannot be told because of the carelessness and indifference with which its documents and masses of other ma- terial have been treated in the past. The history of Newark's two hundred and fifty years is but imperfectly told as a result of the same neglect from early days. This is more or less true of every community in New Jersey, and it is a condition which this commonwealth shares with all of the others. Every now and then we read of one document or another of priceless value being in the possession of some individual when it should be preserved for the benefit of all the people. * * * These old things have a certain practical educational value, distinct and apart from the sentimental. Properly preserved and intelli- gently made use of, they become a fixed asset to the State or the community where they are safely housed and exhibited. The modern public and private schools are steadily preparing the rising- generation for a far keener appreciation of the history of the neighborhood in which one lives." 22 Elizabeth Daily Journal, Feb. 29, igi6: "Documents of ^reat historical value are scattered throughout the State. Little effort has been made in the past to collect and file them in places of safety. Small interest has been taken in preserving masses of material relating to the past of our old commonwealth, its sep- arate counties and communities. * * * It is certainly high time that some definite action were taken in this direction." New Brunswick Times, Feb. 28, 1916: It is a matter of pub- lic knowledge that for years the public records and archives of the State and other political subdivisions, in more or less abun- dance, have frequently been catalogued and sold at public auction in the larger cities for fabulous sums. Some years ago a collec- tion of several thousand pieces of valuable New Jersey State records, advertised to be sold at auction, were recovered for the State by Governor Voorhees through a threat of their impound- ment if they were not forthwith returned. Under similar cir- cumstances and in like manner, another quantity was recently acquired by the direction of Governor Fielder. At other times both Governors Fort and Fielder have found it economical to purchase from their emergency fund small lots of important records from these auction sales." Daily State Gazette, Feb. 15, iyi6: "Too little attention has been paid to this important work (preservation of public rec- ords) in the past, with the result that many valuable records of the early history of the State have fallen into the hands of collectors of such documents and are sold as curiosities. Thev are really the property of the State, and should be in the State's keeping. "This is a work that other States have undertaken and are carrying on at considerable expense. New Jersey has an inter- esting history. There is no State in the Union that should be more vigilant in preserving its records than this, and there is probably no State in the Union that has been more indifferent to its duty in this direction." In the course of our investigations, however, we have accumu- lated certain information which will enable us to know some- thing relative to the condition of our municipal records. COUNTY RECORDS. In 1869 there existed an exceptional circumstance in the Sur- rogate's office of Bergen county, which endangered titles to property and of the rights of persons concerned therein. It was the case where a deceased surrogate had pocketed the fees of his office for about twenty-two consecutive years, without entering matters required by law to be made upon the record books of his office, such as the recording of wills, letters testamentary granted thereon and the like, and the proceedings of the Or- phan's Court for that county. ( See Xew Jersey Laws of 1869, p. 894.) The Third Annual Report of the Commissioner of Public Records of Massachusetts ( 1888) , in speaking of wood pulp in the manufacture of paper, incidentally said: "We could wch some trouble and expense give the experience of a county in New Jersey which had to replace a large number of record books on account of the first ones having so much wood in them." If these records deteriorated so rapidly, may it not be reasonable to assume that similar conditions may exist in other record offices within the State, where inferior blank records were pur- chased as cheaply as the conscience of the record official would admit under the fee system ? A "Docket of the Burlington County Court," from June Term, 1765, to October Term, 1772, was sold at auction in Xew York in April, 19 10, and purchased by the State for $75. The Poll Books of Camden County, 1 856-1 869, are now pos- sessed by private interests. The original "Proceedings of the Freeholders and Justices of Essex County," from 1735 to 1789, are now possessed by pri- vate interests. The "Docket of Gloucester County Court, A — 1754." from September Term, 1754, to December Term, 1761. is controlled by private interests, as is the Poll Books of the same county from 1856 to 1869. Another "Docket" of Gloucester County, from 1761 to 1765, was advertised to be sold by auction in Xew York in December last. The Clerk of Gloucester County recently wrote a member of this Committee, in part: "We are short of some records that should be here. There can be no excuse for anyone having any Court Records in their possession. They are the property of the county and should be here for anyone to examine." Certain "Minutes of the Courts of General Sessions of the Peace and Common Pleas for Middlesex County,'' 174&-1751, and other similar records belonging to that county are also pos- sessed by private interests. CITY RECORDS. During the past summer an effort was made to ascertain the extent of the Public records of certain cities, which have existed under one form of government or another for more than a century. The clerks of some of the cities responded in part as follows: Bridgeton — "Our city records do not extend back prior to the year 1855." Burlington — "To my knowledge the city has no records prior to 1825." This city was incorporated May 7, 1732. The orig- inal oaths of allegiance to King George II. of Great Britain, sworn to and subscribed by the mayor, common council, alder- men, and constables of Burlington, from 1735 to 1758, was sold at auction in New York in December, 191 6. Gloucester — "Our records go back to about 1850. Previous to this time I know nothing about." Jersey City — "Our records extend back to December 1, 1832." Paterson — "In a fire, which wiped out the business section of Paterson in 1902 the City Hall was destroyed. All official records of the city prior to that date were lost." Perth Amboy — "The only thing I can find that looks like a public record prior to 1825 is one minor ordinance dated 18 18. There is not much in the way of record in my office for any period back of 1872, when the present charter of the city was granted by the State Legislature." This city was incorporated originally on August 4, 17 18. Plainfield — "I beg to say that the information you desire is not easily obtainable at the present time. Our facilities for fil- ing have been so limited that things have not been kept up in very good shape. We are, however, building a new City Hall which will probably be ready for occupancy in about a year. At that time all the documents which are now stored away in our vaults will be recatalogued and put in such shape that they can be easily examined." Railway — "The oldest records I have is the record of births, marriages and deaths, and they only go back to 1849." Salem — Mr. George W. Price, Secretary of the Historical Society of Salem County, writes in part : "Some years ago I made a persistent effort to find the early town records of Salem, but without result. They were extant in the 1860's, as shown by affidavits of persons who saw them, nevertheless I have been unable to find them in recent years." TOWN AND TOWNSHIP RECORDS. The following townships have existed under one form of government or another for more than a century, and the condi- tion of their public records are as follows : The record book of Saddle River Township, Bergen Count)', containing over three hundred manuscript pages, extending from 1789 to 1836, alleged by Mr. William Nelson to have been cast out of the Passaic County Office, was sold at auction in New York City in November, 191 5. The records of Piscataway Township, Middlesex County, run- ning from 1896 to 1790, disappeared some time after 1850. The town clerk of Woodbridge Township, Middlesex County, reports that his "Records go back to about 1666." Daily's His- tory of Woodbridge preface — page 3, shows that the first two volumes of these old records are in a dilapidated condition; and in 1859 a portion of these records were found, after their loss were extensively advertised and a reward offered by the town authorities for their return. The clerk of Bound Brook says : "The records in my posses- sion only date back from 1890, at which time this Borough was 26 incorporated; prior to that time it was under a Board of Com- missioners. I assume that these records may be examined at the Somerset County Clerk's Office." The County Clerk of Somerset County writes : "We have nothing in this office per- taining to the Public Records of Bound Brook." The only records of Middletown, Monmouth County, from 1667 to near 1700, was reputed in 1872 to be in possession of the Town Clerk. The clerk of Middletown Township, Monmouth County, in- forms us : "There are no ancient records of Middletown Town- ship in my possession. Sometimes, about 1898, I understood that a number of the books of the Township were destroyed by fire, but I do not think there were any records destroyed prior to 1875. Where they are I am unable to tell as they were never handed to me. My records do not go back of 1898." "We have no records of the time you mention (1825)," says the clerk of Shrewsbury Township, in Monmouth County; con- tinuing, he adds, "You will probably find them at Trenton, if there are any." The town clerk of Freehold writes : "I am unable to give you any information relative to the records of the Town of Freehold prior to 1869." The borough clerk of Princeton says : "We have a record book commencing 181 3, Births and Deaths, &c, and records of council." The old record book of Maidenhead (now Lawrence) Town- ship, Mercer County, commencing in 1716, after remaining in private hands for a century was turned over to the clerk's office of Mercer county about 1909. The docket of Benjamin Smith, Justice of the Peace in Tren- ton, commencing in 1788, and also containing many records of marriages, was given away to private interests some years ago. The clerk of Northampton Township, Burlington County, by which township Mount Holly is governed, reports : "The earliest Minute Book which I am able to find in the vault dated only 1847." The Chesterfield Township, Burlington County, record book, extending from December 15, 1692 to December 2, 171 1, was sold some years ago at public auction, and is now located in the District of Columbia. The record book of Mansfield Township, Burlington County, beginning January i, 1697, and ending September 15, 1773, was sold at a Philadelphia auction sale on April 25, 1906, for the sum of $100. NEW JERSEY NEW YORK RECORDS INSEPARABLE. It is not generally known by the average local historian in New Jersey, much less by its intelligent citizens, that a bulk of our earliest Colonial records — both under the Dutch and English regime — were retained in New York upon the separation of this Province from that government in 1738; and even since im- portant papers of a latter date are yet to be found among them. The record office of, East Jersey was not established at Perth Amboy until January 8, 1713; and it is uncertain when the records of West Jersey were directed to be kept in Burlington. These invaluable public papers relate both to East and West Jersey, and to the several town governments and people there )f, Among them will be found the original minutes of our first legislature ; messages and proclamations of, petitions ana me- morials to, the Governors ; privileges granted to the several towns, and the appointment or election of certain civil and military officers thereto for a series of years subsequent to 1672 ; census of these towns in 1673 \ organization of the several courts, proceedings thereof, and its decisions in the trial of various civil and criminal causes; military rolls and kindred papers; and sundry ecclesiastical matters and that relating to the social and economic condition of the people of New Jersey. Many years ago these papers were copied at the expense of a few thousand dollars of State funds, but the transcripts have been withheld by private parties, as have other transcripts which, by law, should be in the State's possession, costing many thou- sands of dollars. 2$ Mutilation of Pubuc Records. The piratical practice of mutilating public records, by abstract- ing a manuscript page because it contans a rare .autograph of a distinguished person, or reference to a valuable historical item, cannot be too strongly condemned. Whether committed by a collector or for purpose of sale, the perpetration of this outrage is only too common. And the auction rooms advertise the crime. To illustrate, a well-known auction house in Philadelphia, a few years ago advertised to sell on a certain date a document bearing the scarce signature of John Hart. In the catalogue was added to the announcement : "An original page from the manuscript minutes of the Legislature of New Jersey, containing the resolution in reference to sending commissioners to the New Haven Convention, to regulate labor, manufactures, etc. Signet as Speaker of the House." In the same catalogue was listed another similar item, which read: "New Jersey Council of Safety. A page from the original Minute Book, containing Minutes of the Meeting held at Haddonfield, March 18 and 19, 1777." Again, a typical example of the vandalism which is com- mitted upon our public records is exhibited in Liber A of the Woodbridge Town Records. The first portion of this volume is made up of the original records of surveys, deeds and other legal instruments in Woodbridge, Middlesex County, extending from 1668 to 1 731; and the remaining part contains the pro- ceedings of the town meetings for about the same period. Yet some person had the temerity to disintegrate this record volume more than fifty years ago, and with his compliments presented the first portion thereof to certain private interests, which necessarily knew the manner in which these invaluable records were ob- tained. 2g Prices Obtained by Sale oe Public Records. The value of public documents should not be established by the auctioneer. Nevertheless, there is an annual increased de- mand for the acquisition of manuscripts of all kinds, and the prices obtained for them at public sale is governed largely by many circumstances, especially their condition and the histori '.al importance of the subject they respectively contain. A general knowledge of the market value whch has been established at auction sales in recent years for some of our State documents will illustrate their importance as follows : The New Jersey Copy of the original deed authorizing the survey for the boundary between New York and New Jersey, accompanied with a manuscript map of the line, dated July 25, 1 7 19, sold in 19 1 3 for $2,600.00. At the same sale the original agreement between the Governors of East and West Jersey, determining the boundary lines between these two provinces, dated September 5, 1688, brought $1,220.00. The original Minutes of the General Assembly between Sep- tember 26 and October 26, 1770, was purchased by the State for $16.00. The messages of the following Governors to the House of Assembly brought the prices specified : Gov. Belcher, January 13, 1747-8, $2.25; Gov. Boone, No- vember 28, 1760, 75 cents; and Acting-Governor Hamilton. June 16, 1746, $6.50. A Petition from the College of New Jersey to the General Assembly, January 2, 1781, brought $31.00; another one from the Inhabitants of Rahway, March 28, 1765, brought 30 cents; while one from Captain Daniel Neil and officers of the Eastern Artillery Company of New Jersey, September 16, 1776, sold for $15.00. The letter from Governor Franklin to his attorney-general, January 22, 1768, brought $6.50; while another to Council and the General Assembly, June 22, 1776, sold for $50.00. The letters from the following persons to Governor Living- ston sold for the prices affixed to them ; 30 General Nathaniel Heard, April 8, 1777, $2.50; and another from the same person, May 10, 1777, $10.00; Capt. Frederick Frelinghuysen, August 25, 1777, $35.00; General Silas New- comb, August 20, 1777, $5.50; Gen. Matthias Williamson, Sep- tember 26, 1776, $16.00; Gen. Israel Putmian, April 25, 1777, $29.00. The letter from Mahlon Dickerson to the Legislature, Octo- ber 27, 18 1 5, accepting the governorship, brought $2.20. The resignation of John DeHart as a member of Continental Con- gress in 1776 sold for $22.00. The Account of Abraham Clark against the State for his attendance in the Continental Congress from November 15, 1782, to October 31, 1783, brought $47.00. The report of the Commissioners for Building the Secretary's Office at Perth Amboy, October 8 to December 2, 1762, sold for $7.50. The pay warrant of Ellis Cook as a deputy in the Provincial Congress, March 2, 1776, brought $13.00. The docu- ment appointing Joseph Woodruff "Water BaylifTe and Public Notary of the County of Salem," August 26, 1703, sold for $23.00. And the application of Agnes Heard to the Middlesex County Court, July 21, 1761, to keep a public house, went for $2.00. Accessibility of Public Records. Generally there is no difficulty in gaining access to the public papers in any well-regulated record office. Where these public repositories are overcrowded, the records are not only insuf- ficiently protected against fire or theft, but they are not easily accessible. The situation is entirely different with the public records in private possession. If a person is granted permission to examine any public papers he is fortunate enough to locate in private possession, he miust be subjected to the vexatious delays incident in obtaining the desired permission, besides the traveling ex- penses attached thereto. In some many instances persons will positively deny that they have possession of any public records when they have ; and by other persons they will regard it as an intrusion to be asked the question. . 3* It is impossible for persons to gain access to public records possessed by private interests, such as historical and geneologi- cal societies, semi-public libraries and the like, unless you ire I member of the institution having them, duly elected and upon payment of the annual dues. Some exceptions are made to this general rule by certain institutions, as a matter of grace, how- ever, where persons desire access to special records for a limited time, providing you pay the fees they exact for the privilege. To illustrate, a member of this Committee during the past sum- mer asked permission from one of these institutions to examine the original Answer to the Elizabethtown Bill in Chancery, and he received the following reply: "In reply to your favor of the nth instant, this Society has in its possession the original manuscript of the Answer to the Elizabethtown Bill in Chancery. We will allow you to examine this manuscript in our Society building, but, as a non-member of the Society, we will have to charge you $i a day during the time that you are exam- ining it. It cannot be taken out of the office of the Society and we cannot under any circumstances permit it to be photographed.'' The famous original Elizabethtowm Bill of Chancery is prop- erly possessed by the Chancery Office in Trenton, while the original Answer thereto is unlawfully retained by certain private interests beyond the State, demanding fees from the citizens of Xew Jersey for the privilege of examining one of its own State documents. General Remarks. Thus we might continue to relate other innumerable details concerning the condition of our public records. We can only report what we said in the beginning — "Of all the States of the Union, Xew Jersey has premier cause and greatest need for care in protecting its records of the past, and in safeguarding the making of its records now and for the future." Where are the Public Credentials of Xew Jersey ? The original grants and kindred papers are in private possession, as are many of the original Journals of the General Assembly; the Journals of the Provincial Congress and of the Constitutional Convention of 1776; Messages and official Corespondence of the Governors; Petitions to the General Assembly ; Court Dockets and Minutes ; Town and Township Records; and other innumerable records and manuscripts of priceless value. They have all been abstracted from the official files, and many have been thrown out of public offices as junk by careless and ignorant officials. They have been given away by the sacred instrument of the last will and testament, and otherwise dis- posed of. They have been mutilated and destroyed for personal gain,* Again, many of these valuable historic records have been floating around the auction houses of the country for the past seventy years, sold and resold, and the spoils of the plunder divided between the auctioneers and the marauder. These con- ditions are startling and shocking to the senses of mankind in this age of civilization. The evil should be immediately stamped out for all time. No less abominable, however, is the condition of the public records of certain municipalities of the State, from whom we have been fortunate in obtaining any information whatever rela- tive to the extent of their archives and records. Take the cities of Perth Amboy and Burlington, for example. Their Clerks substantially tell us that they have no records for the first two hundred and fifty years of their incorporated existence ; and the records in most of the remaining municipalities we have specific- ally referred to, are practically in the same condition. The extent of the records in other political divisions of the State yet remains to be seen. If these conditions are not checked, the present records of many of these offices will be obliterated fifty years hence. The advanced position which New Jersey has taken upon educational lines through the annual appropriation of millions of dollars to enhance and extend our public school system, the rising generation is steadily preparing' for a far keener apprecia- tion of the history of the State and the neighborhood in which 33 they live, and nothing could be more cpnducive to their enlight- enment than the preservation, collation, retrievement, and the accessibility of our public records. The Proposition. The establishment of a Department of Public Records, as proposed in Senate Bill Xo. 248, is the only practical method, in our judgment, by which the evils associated with our Public Records can be eliminated. It will not necessarily be an expen- sive department to operate successfully. The bill speaks for itself. It provides full opportunity for investigating officially the condition and extent of all public records in every municipality of the State, by ascertaining what records are in proper control, which are missing and the cause and location thereof; the retrievement of all lost records and manuscripts ; collation of the State archives, and the acquisition of others by consent ; and the preservation of deteriorated and mutilated records, maps and other manuscripts. It gives the Commission, who are to serve without compensa- tion, authority to suggest to the Legislature such reforms, from time to time, as ma)' be beneficial to enact for the preservation and safeguarding of the public records. Very respectfully submitted, NELSON B. GASKILL, HIRAM E. DEATS, WILLIAM LIBBEY, JOSEPH S. FRELINGHUYSEN, WILLIAM M. JOHNSON, E. R. WALKER, CARLOS E. GODFREY, THOMAS S. CHAMBERS. RKC APPENDIX "A." Calendar of Public Papers selected from a thousand or more manuscripts in Private Possession. Figures in brackets indicate approximate years or number of letters. ROYAL GRANTS POWER OF GOVERNMENT, ETC. Original Lease for a year from James, Duke of York, to Lords Berkley and Carteret for the whole of New Jersey, June 23, 1664. Original Release of the same, June 24, 1664. Original Lease for a year from James, Duke of York, to Sir George Carteret for half of the northern of New Jersey July 28, 1674. Original Release of the same, July 29, 1674. Original Quintepartite Deed dividing the Province into East and West Jersey differently from the grant to Sir George Carteret in July, 1674, dated July 1, 1676. Original Release from James, Duke of York, to Sir George Carteret (the grandson and heir of the first Sir George) for all of East Jersey, dated Sept. 10, 1680. Original Release of Elizabeth Carteret, widow and Executrix, and the Trustees of Sir George, to the first Twelve Proprietors for all of East Jersey, Jan. 1, 1682. Original Release of James, Duke of York, to Edward Byl- linge, et al, for West Jersey, Aug. 6, 1680. "The Fundamental Constitutions" sent to the Province of New Jersey in 1683, by the Twenty- four Proprietors. Memorial of the Proprietors of East Jersey, with proposal upon which they offer to surrender their government to the Crown, July 5, 1698. Original instrument of the surrender of the powers of govern- ment of the Proprietors of East Jersey to King William III. in 1702. 35 36 INSTRUCTIONS TO THE} EXECUTIVE. To. Gov. Philip Carteret: July 31, 1674. To Gov. William Burnet: Nov. 30, 1721 ; June 3, 1722: Feb. 23, 1723; Mar. 23, 1727. Executive messages to the council and general assembly. From Gov. Jonathan Belcher: Feb. 22, 1750. From Gov. Josiah Hardy: Jan. 8, 1762. Executive proclamations. From Gov. Jeremiah Basse: May 24, 1698. From Gov. Robert Hunter: Aug. 9, 1711; Dec. 28, 17 18. From Gov. William Burnet: July 23, 1726. \ Executive correspondence. Letter Books of Gov. Jonathan Belcher, September, 1747, to October, 1748; October, 1750, .to August, 1752; and July to December, 1755. Letter Books of Gov. Francis Bernard, 1 758-1 760. Correspondence of the Earl of Dartmouth to Gov. William Franklin, 1 773-1 775. Letter Books of Gov. Lewis Morris, May, 1739, to March, 1746. Executive council. Minutes of the Governor's Council, Dec. 8-10, 1746; Mar. 18-19, May 6-1 1, 1747. Manuscript Declaration and Protestation of the Governor and Council against James Carteret, May 28, 1672. 37 MINUTES OF THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL AND THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY. [Minutes of the Legislative Council: June 2-12, 1680; Oct. 19 to Nov. 2, 1 681; Sept. 20 to Oct. 23, 1686; Mar. 12, 1687; Sept. 28, 1692. Minutes of the General Assembly: 1751-52; 1777-8-9; 1780-1; 1782-84; 1786-88-90; 1806-8. GENERAL ASSEMBLY — MISCELLANEOUS. Return of the deputies elected to the General Assembly, May 22 to June 2, 1680. Expulsion of William Douglass, member of the Legislative Council of Bergen, "on account of his being a Roman Catholic,'' June 10, 1680. Document signed and sealed by the High Sheriff of Mon- mouth County, Apr. 1, 1772, certifying to the election of Ed- ward Taylor and Richard Lawrence as Members of the General Assembly. PETITIONS AND MEMORIALS TO THE COUNCIL AND GENERAL ASSEMBLY &C. Petition to the General Assembly for a Lottery in Perth Am- boy, May 20, 1765. Petition of the Goaler at Burlington to the Governor and Council, April 20, 1771. Memorial of the Freeholders of Hunterdon County to their representatives in the General Assembly, May, 177L Petitions and Memorials of the Eastern and Western Pro- prietors of New Jersey to the Legislature in 1775. Petition from the Inhabitants of Toms River to the Council and General Assembly, Dec. 10, 1781. Petition from John Fitch to the Legislature, Mar. 14, 1786, requesting a grant of the exclusive privilege of constructing boats impelled by steam. 38 Memorial to the Legislature in behalf of Idiots, Epileptics and Insane Poor, 1845. COMMITTEE OF SAFETY. Votes and Proceedings of the Committee of Safety of New Jersey, January and March, 1776. Proceedings of the Committee of Safety of Shrewsbury, from May 27, 1775, to Mar 6, 1776. Proceedings of the Committee of Correspondence of Shrews- bury, May 27, 1775, to Mar. 6, 1776. Letter from the Committee of the People of Essex County to the Inhabitants of Monmouth County, June 13, 1774, com- menting on the events at Boston regarding American liberties, and recommending a general meeting at New Brunswick on July 21. Letter from the New York Committee of Safety to the Com- mittee of Safety of New Jersey, Sept. 27, 1775. Letter from Lprd Sterling to the Committee of Safety, Mar. x 7> I 77^* relative to the necessity of suspending the operation of the civil law during the campaign. Letter from the Committee of Inspection of Freehold to the Inhabitants of Shrewsbury, Mar. 6, 1775, urging the election of Delegates to the Provincial Congress. PROVINCIAL CONGRESS. Minutes of the Committee of Safety and Provincial Congress, Jan. 11 to Feb. 6; Feb. 27 to Mar. 2; June 21 to July 23, 1776. Orders of the Provincial Congress and Convention of New Jersey relative to the militia, June 14 and Aug. 11, 1776. Articles of Association of the Freeholders and Inhabitants of Pequanock, Morris County, pledging to sustain the action of the Continental and Provincial Congresses, May, 1775. Pledge of certain officers of the 1st Militia Regiment of Middlesex County, Feb. 24, 1776, to carry into execution the orders of the Provincial Congress. 39 COUNCIL OF SAFETY. Memoranda of Evidence against Tories for the Council of Safety, Dec. i, 1776. Affidavit taken before the Council of Safety, Aug. 19, 1778, respecting the movement of the Indians on the frontiers. Letter from Gen. Philemon Dickinson to the Council of Safety, Sept. 7, 1778. CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION — 1 776. Journals of the Convention which framed the first Constitu- tion of New Jersey in 1776. BOUNDARY LINES. Report of the Attorney-General on the ancient boundaries of the Province of New York, and showing the necessity of rean- nexing Connecticut, New Jersey, Delaware and Pennsylvania, Aug. 6, 1 69 1. Application for the Royal Approval of the Act of the Assem- bly for running the New Jersey-New York boundary line, 1753. Decision of the Commissioners to settle the boundary line be- tween New Jersey and New York, Oct. 7, 1769. CENSUS. Census of Elizabethtown, Newark, Woodbridge, Piscataway. Middletown and Shrewsbury, Sept. 14, 1673. CHURCHES. Letter from Gov. Hunter to the society for the Propagation of the Gospel, Dec. 5, 1712, relative to their purchase of the Tatham house and plantation at Burlington. 40 Petition of John Bishop, Henry Rolph and other freeholders and inhabitants of Woodbridge, for a license to build an Epis- copal Church, May 19, 17 14. Charter of the Baptist . Church in Hopewell, Hunterdon County, Dec. 5, 1769. civile OFFICERS. Return of June 30, 1680, showing that John Ward and others were chosen overseers of Newark. Return of New Jersey appointments, July 21, 30, 1680. Return of July 21, 1680, showing certain persons chosen over- seers of Piscataway. Return of the Town officers elected in Bergen, Aug. 17, 1680. Salaries of the necessary officers in New Jersey, Dec. 13, 1705. Return of the sheriffs of the several counties to be commis- sioned, Nov. 25, 171 1. COURTS. Gloucester County Docket — A — 1754. September Term, 1754 to December Term, 1762. Minutes of the Courts of General Sessions of the Peace and Common Pleas of Middlesex County, July 19-20, 1748; July 16-17, I75I- Proceedings of the Freeholders and Justices of Essex County from 1735 to 1789. Docket of Benj. Smith, Justice of the Peace in Trenton, be- ginning in 1788, which contains records of many marriages. Papers containing the indictment of John Fenwick for assum- ing to be Lord Chief Proprietor, his trial, sentence, and appeal to the King denied, between October, 1676, and Aug. 22, 1678. Names of the Justices and Clerk of the monthly courts at Elizabethtown, July 3, 1680. Proceedings of the Court of Sessions held at Piscataway, Sept. 3, 1680. Dates of commission of certain persons to be Judges of the Court of Common Right in Monmouth County, Dec. 30, 1692. 41 AYarrant issued at St. James appointing William Trent Chief Justice, Feb. 7, 1724. Decree of the Court of Chancery, Aug", jo, 1 744, in case of Daniel Smith vs. the Heirs and Executors of Gabriel Stelle. ELECTIONS. Schedule, of 'Votes cast in Sussex County in October, 1792, for representatives in Congress, Council and Assembly, and Sheriffs and Coroners. " ■ ELIZABETHTOWN BILL. Answer to the Elizabethtown Bill in Chancery. ESTATES. Petition of Thomas Olive, of Burlington, for letters of ad- ministration on the estate of Thomas Palmer, deceased, Oct. 31, 1681. FERRIES. Petition of Joseph Fitz Randolph to the Assembly for exclu- sive ferry privileges between Staten Island and New Jersey, Apr. 23, 1729. Petition of xAnthony White, of New Jersey, to the Assembly for a ferry from Staten Island and Bergen Point, July 10, 1764. JUSTICES OE THE PEACE AND MAGISTRATES. Return of Magistrates elected in Bergen, Aug. 18, 1673 : Aug. 25, 1674; July 27, 1 68 1. Return of the Magistrates of Burlington, May 21, 1680. Dates of commission of the several Justices of the Peace in Middlesex County in 1688. A 2 UND TITLES. Claim of the Inhabitants of Newark in 1766, by virtue of Indian purchases made by the first settlers thereof in 1667. Opinion of the Council of East Jersey Proprietors concerning the invalidity of Nicoll's grants, and Indian purchases against the title of Berkley and Carteret, given in 1700. Authority from Lieut-Gov. Ingoldesby to John Rudyard to purchase land in West Jersey from the Indians, Nov. 17, 1703. LOAN OFFICE. Letter from Jona, Deare, Clerk of the General Assembly, to John Johnston, Nov. 23, iJ7'6, transmitting an Order of the House to transfer the Loan Office money to Richard Smith, Treasurer. Six Books of Accounts, Bonds, Mortgages, Etc., of the Com- missioners of the Loan Office for Burlington County from 1776 to 1778, with Sinking Fund Quotos of the several townships in the county from 1775 to 1784. MILITIA. Return of the officers appointed for the town of Bergen, Sept. 4, 1673. Return of the officers of Elizabethtown, Newark, Woodbridge, Piscataway, Middletown and Shrewsbury, Sept. 14, 1673. Military appointments for Freehold, Middletown, Shrewsbury, Manasquan and Shark River, Mar. 2, 1704. Muster Roll of Col. Richard Ing'oldesby's Independent Com- pany of Grenadiers, Oct. 25, 17 14. List of substitutes furnished by certain persons to be enlisted in His Majesty's service, August, 1746. Pay Roll of Captairf James Parker's Company, May 8, 1747. Orders to the officers of militia of Monmouth County to keep a watch at the highlands of Navisink, and to prepare signals and beacons, Apr. 24, 1755. 43 Muster Roll of Captain William Skinner's Company, on the northern frontier, May 6, 1755. List of officers recommended to the Provincial Congress for the 1st Somerset Regiment, Jan. 26, 1776. Return of the officers of the Third New Jersey Continental Regiment, Oct. 26, 1776, with notes of their professional ca- pacity. Return of General Newcomb's brigade, stationed at Wood- bury, November 18, 1777. Muster and Descriptive Roll of Col. Frelinghuysen's recruits for the New Jersey Continental Line, May 21, 1778. Order Book of Third New Jersey Continental Regiment, May 26 to Sept. 4, 1779. PROPRIETORS OP EAST JERSEY. Order of the Proprietors directing an examination into the affairs of the Province, Oct. 21, 1685. Settlements by Receiver-General of the quit rents with the people of Newark, Achqueckennuck, Bergen, Hackensack, Saddle River, Woodbridge and Raritan River, 1707 to 1726. Book of Accounts of the Treasurers and Agents, Sept. 12, 1 77 1, to July 11, 1842. PROPRIETORS OP WEST JERSEY. Instructions of William Penn and others to the Commis- sioners sent by them to West Jersey to arrange their affairs with John Fenwick, and provide for the survey and settlement of the country, Aug. 6, 1676. Account of the disposal of shares or proprieties by Edward Byllinge from Mar. 12, 1676, to Aug. 21, 1678. Protest of certain citizens to the Assembly against a body styling themselves a Council of Proprietors for West New Jer- sey, Dec. 11, 171 1. Letters from Lewis Morris to his son, Lewis Morris, Jr., dated Chelsea, Eng., Aug. 1 and 29, 1735, saying The West 44 Jersey Society requests all their books and papers, excepting bonds, be sent to England ; and requesting special information relative to the title of "Paraphilia," in Salem County. PROVINCIAL AGENTS. (20) Letters fromi Joseph Sherwood, Agent for the Province in England, to Samuel Smith, Treasurer, from 1761 to 1766. Letter from The Committee of the House of Assembly, Dec. 7, 1769, informing Dr. Benjamin Franklin of his appointment as Agent of the Province of New Jersey in England. PUBLIC ACCOUNTS. Accounts of Thomas Gordon, Receiver-General, of the reve- nue of the Colony of New Jersey for two years, June 23, 1712. Accounts of the Paupers maintained by the Township of Woodbridge from 1797 to 1801. Accounts of Col. Peter Schuyler, as Colonel and Paymaster of the New Jersey Regiment in 1759 and 1760, as settled by a Committee of the General Assembly. Accounts of Andrew Johnston, Treasurer of East Jersey, from December, 1761, to May, 1763, submitted by his executors to the Committee of the Assembly. Certificates of unpaid obligations of New Jersey, 1782. RATABLES. Ratables for Freehold Township, Monmouth County, in 1776. RIOTS, List of rioters in Middlesex County, called the Amboy Riot, August, 1747. List of persons indicted for high treason, in Amboy Riots, August, 1747. • List of persons indicted for riots in Somerset County Quarter Sessions, and removed into the Supreme Court, May, 1747. 45 List of rioters in Essex County returned upon a record of view filed in the Supreme Court in May Term, 1746. Affidavits of certain persons taken by the Council Oct. 11-16, 1749, with reference to the riots in New Jersey, and the manner in which they pretend to hold their lands. The above five (5) papers laid before the Legislative Council by Gov. Belcher, Nov. 19, 1747. A statement of facts concerning- the riots and insurrections in Xew Jersey, and the remedies attempted by the Governor and the Legislature to put an end to them, reported to the Council Jan. 9, 1748, and agreed to by them. TORIES. Warant of Gov. Livingston to arrest certain Tories, July 25, 1777. Official estimates of the value of the property left by John Terrill, Philip Kearny, Thomas Crowell and others, refugees, I783- TOWNS AND TOWNSHIPS. Book containing original records of survey, deeds and other legal instruments in Woodbridge from 1668 to 1731. Privileges granted by the Dutch Commissioners to the several towns in Xew Jersey Aug. 18, 1673. Directions of the Proprietors in England for laying out "Perth Towne" ( Perth Amboy), Sept. 21, 1683. Chesterfield Town Docket, Burlington County, Dec. 15, 1692, to Dec. 2, 1 71 1. The Poll of the freeholders of Hunterdon County, Oct. 9, 1/38. Petition of 404 Inhabitants of Newark to the King in Council, I750. Assessments made in Middletown in 1761. Assessments made in Perth Amboy in 1801, 1803 and 1804.. Town Committee minutes of Newark from 181 1 to 18 r 5. 4 6 TREASURY. Deposition of Stephen Skinner, Treasurer of East Jersey, as to the robbery of his office, July 25, 1768. MISCELLANEOUS. Names of persons who took the oaths at Elizabethtown, Shrewsbury, Middletown, Piscataway, Newark and Woodbridge, September, 1673. "Propositions for ye Settlement of Paraphilia by the Gover- nor," 1699. Note: Pamphilia was in Salem County. Letter from Gov. Cornbury to the Inhabitants of Bergen, May 16, 1706, calling for stockades to be built to repel an attack on New York from a French squadron. Letter from Thomas Gardiner, of Burlington, to Secretary Clarke, requesting him not to grant a license for the marriage of his daughter, May 3, 171 1. Papers concerning the jnstructions of the Governor and Coun- cil to Col. Abraham Van Camp of Sussex County, November, 1754, to adopt measures for the protection of the inhabitants on the frontiers. Orders for the arrest of Petrus Smoke, Sheriff of Sussex County, and other persons for ousting Philip Swartwout from his lands, Oct. 11, 1759. Papers relating to lands and settlers on the Passaic River, etc., from 1756 to 1773. List of prisoners in Morristown Goal, August 1777, sent to the Governor and Council. APPENDIX B. Calendar of Public Papers selected from several thousand manu- scripts Sold or Offered for Sale in various Auction Houses since 1900. Figures in brackets indicate approximate years or number of letters. Executive messages to the council and general assembly or legislature. From Gov. Jonathan Belcher: Aug. 20, 1747; Nov. 19, 1747; Dec. 19, 1747; Jan. 13, 1748; Jan. 19, 1748; Feb. 17, 1748; Oct. 21, 1748; Nov. 28, 1748; Sept. 28, 1749; Oct. 5, 1749; Feb. 22, 1751; Apr. 29, 1754; Aug. 7, 1755; May 31, 1757; Aug. 29, 1757. From Gov. Francis Bernard: Mar. 10, 1759. From Gov. Joseph Bloomfield : Jan. 25, 181 1. From Gov. Thomas Boone: Nov. 28, 1760; Apr. I, 1761. From Gov. Mahlon Dickerson : Oct. 23, 1816. From Gov. William Franklin: Nov. 30, 1765; Nov. 21, 1775- From Acting Gov. John Hamilton: June 16, 1746. From Gov. Josiah Hardy: Dec. 4, 1761 ; *Sept. 21, 1762; *Dec. 10, 1761. From Gov. William Livingston: Aug. 29, 1780: Sept. 28, 1 78 1 : Dec. 9, 1782; June 12, 1783; Oct. 25, 1787; Jan. 8, 1790; May 19, 1792. From Gov. Lewis Morris: 1738; Oct. 1743. From Gov. William S. Pennington: Jan. n, 1815. From Acting Gov. John Reading: 1758. From Gov. Isaac H. Williamson: Nov. 4, 1817: Jan. t;, 1818. 47 4 8 Executive answers to the addresses oe the assembly. From Gov. Jonathan Belcher: Aug., 1747; Nov. 17, 1748. From Gov. Lewis Morris: 1738; 1740; (2) 1741; 1743; (2) 1745. Executive proclamations. From Gov. William Burnett: Aug. 18', 1725; Apr. 3, 1727. From Acting Gov. John Hamilton: June 14, 1746. Executive correspondence. Gov. Jonathan Belcher. Letter from the Lord Commission- eis, Nov. 25, 1748. Gov. Joseph Bloomfield. Letter to Adjutant-General Hunt (no date). Gov. William Burnet : Letter from the Board of Trade, July 9, 1723. Gov. William Franklin. Letter to Cortlandt Skinner, At- torney-General, Jan. 22, 1768; Letter to the Council and Gen- eral Assembly, June 22, 1776. Gov. Josiah Hardy. Letter to John Smith of Burlington, Nov. 8, 1762, giving, his reasons for a Constitutional Council in New Jersey. Gov. Richard Howell Letter from Thomas Jefferson, Apr. 26, 1793; Letter from John Neilson, of New Brunswick, July 20, 1793; Letter from Thomas Jefferson, Feb. 16, 1801. Gov. William Livingston. Letter from Elias Boudinot, Oct. 23, 1782; Letter from the President of the Continental Con- gress, Dec. 14, 1779, April 13, 1783: Letter from the Secretary of the Continental Congress, July 17, 1782; Letter from the Continental Navy Board, Aug, 29, 1777; Letter from Col. Elias Dayton, May 5, 1777; Letter from Col, Samuel Forman, Apr. 7, 1777; Letter from Frederick Frelinghuysen, Aug. 20, 1777; Letter from Gen. Alexander Hamilton, Sept. 26, 1789; Letter from Gen. Nathaniel Heard, Apr. 8, 1777; Letter from Robert L. Hooper, Nov. 1777; Letter from William C. Houston, Dec. 49 20, 1779; Letter from Thomas Jefferson, Aug. 18, 1790; Letter from Gen. Benjamin Lincoln, Oct. 23, 1782; Letter from Gen. William Maxwell, Jan. 24, 1777; Apr. 25, 1777; Letter from Chief Justice Robert Morris, July 5, and Xov. 12, 1777; Letter from Joseph Nourse, Jan. 19, 1778; Letter from Samuel Os- good, Sept. 1786; Letter from Gen. Israel Putnam, Apr. 25, 1777; Letter from Justice Isaac Smith, Mar. 28, 1777; Letter from Gen. John Stark, Oct. 18, 1776; Letter from Gen. Adam Stephen. Oct. 22, 1776; Letter from Justice John Cleves Symmes, June 29, 1777; Feb. 14, 1780; Letter from Gen. George Washington, Sept. 3, 1781. Gov. William S. Pennington. Letter from Gen. Aaron Og- den, May 31, 1814; Letter from Joseph Bloomrield, June 30, 1814. Gov. Thomas Pownell. Letter to Acting Gov. John Read- ing, Alar. 11, 1758. MINUTES OF THE EXECUTIVE COUNCIL. Minutes of the Governor and Council, Sept. 26 to Oct. 26, 1770; Alar. 11 to May 16, 1774: July 18, 1777, to Oct. 7, 1780; Xov. 9, 1780, to Feb. 29, 1796. executive — miscellany. A series of Manuscript Records, 1 708-1 734, comprising orders of the Governors, Lieutenant-Governors, Acts of Assem- bly, etc. Addresses of the Council and General Assembly to the Gov- ernors, and Messages of the Governors to the Council, etc., from 1710 to 1749 — 18 pieces. MINUTES OE THE COUNCIL AND GENERAL ASSEMBLY. &C. Minutes of the Council and General Assembly, June 13 to Aug. 21, 1766; Apr. 12 to May 7, 1768; Apr. 24 to Aug. 2T, 4 REC 5o iyyi; Nov. 21 to Dec. 20, 1771 ; Aug. 21 to Sept. 17, 1772; 1776. A page from the original Minutes of the General Assembly, containing the resolution for sending commissioners to the New Haven Convention to regulate labor, manufactures, etc., (1776) signed by John Hart, Speaker of the House. Minutes of a Council for the General Assembly, Oct. 2, 1694. Messages (3) of the Council to the House of Assembly in 1749-50. LETTERS ADDRESSED TO THE COUNCIL,, GENERAL, ASSEMBLY OR LEGISLATURE. Letter from Charles Reed to Council, Sept. 7, 1757, saying that John Reading had refused to administer the government of New Jersey upon the death of Gov. Belcher. Letter from Justice Robert Morris to< the Assembly with ref- erence to the law limiting prices and withholding the necessities of life in New Jersey. Letter from John Hancock, President of Congress, to the General Assembly, Oct. 2, 1776. Letter from Gen. William Winds to the Legislature, Sept. 25, 1777. Letter from the Officers of the New Jersey Brigade to the Legislature, July 30, 1778. Letter from Gov. Richard Howell to the Legislature, Nov. 18, 1799. Letter from Oliver H. Perry, acknowledging the Vote of Thanks of the Legislature in 18 13. PETITIONS AND MEMORIALS TO THE GOVERNOR, COUNCIL AND GENERAL ASSEMBLY. Petition from the owners of Bloomaries in Morris County, Oct. 6, 1 75 1, praying to be exempt from' tax. Petition from the Inhabitants of Hanover Township, Morris County, Mar. 9, 1756, concerning the frontiers and supporting troops by tax. , 5i Petition from the Inhabitants of Princeton, Apr. n, 1758, praying that Barracks may be built there. ' Petition from the Inhabitants of Burlington County, Mar. 8, 1763, regarding the killing of sheep by dogs. Petition of the Inhabitants of Railway, Mar. 28. 1765, for erecting a dam on Railway River at Elizabethtown. Petition of the Inhabitants of Perth Amboy and Middlesex County, May 8, 1765, to rebuild the Court house at Perth Amboy. Petition by Rev. William Tennent, May 27, 1765, for reim- bursement for the removal of the Indians from Cranbury to Brotherton. Petition of Shepard' Kollock, asking to be appointed State Printer. Memorial of the Inhabitants of Bergen County, May 3, 1783, protesting to interpreting the 5th and 6th Articles of the Treaty with Great Britain, so as to allow traitors, felloes, robbers, murderers, etc., to return back and enjoy privileges of citizen- ship. Petition of the Inhabitants of Trenton and Nottingham, Fell. 24, 1786, for corporate powers. Petition of the citizens of Perth Amboy, May 29, 1786, for the General Assembly to select that town for its sittings. Petition from the Inhabitants of Bethlehem Township,- Hun- terdon County, Oct. 16, 1794, against dividing the county. Petition of William Henry Harrison (9th President of the United States), Oct. 10, 1810, concerning his title to land in Xew Jersey. Memorial of Aaron Ogden, Oct. 29, 181 3, praying relief re- garding steamboat navigation. Petition of the Inhabitants of Maidenhead Township, Hunter- don County, Dec, 181 5, asking the name of the township be changed to "Lawrence." 52 CONTINENTAL CONGRESS. Resolution of the Continental Congress addressed to the Con- vention of New Jersey in October, 1775, signed 'by the President and Secretary, calling for New Jersey troops in the Continental Army. Resignation of John DeHart as a Delegate in the Continental Congress, addressed to the General Assembly of New Jersey, dated Elizabethtown, Nov. 13, 1775, and giving reasons therefor. Resolves of the Continental Congress of June 2 and Sept. 10, 1781, transmitted to the Legislature. Oaths of Allegiance of the Delegates of New Jersey in the Continental Congress, between 1781 and 1783, required by law. Receipt of Lambert Cadwalader to the State of New Jersey, Oct. 26, 1787, for pay as a Delegate in the Continental Con- gress. COMMITTEE OE SAEETY. Miscellaneous^ papers from the Monmouth County Committee of Safety, Oct., 1775, relative to the capture of the tender of the sloop-O'f-war "Viper." Certificate of John Hart to the payment of the salary of John Pope, .May 15, 1776, as a member of the Committee of Safety. Deposition of , Isaac Potter before the Committee of Safety, Apr. 7, 1777, against Joseph Salter, a Tory. Affidavits of various residents of New Jersey, giving evidence before the Committee of Safety against their townsmen, who were aiding and abetting the British, taken mostly before Gov. Livingston. 18 pieces. PROVINCIAL CONGRESS. Order for the payment of salary to Jesse Hand, as a member of the New Jersey Provincial Congress, Feb. 27, 1776. Pay Warrant of Ellis Cook as a Deputy in the Provincial Con- gress, Mar. 8, 1776. 53 Several letters on various subjects addressed to the Provincial Congress in 1775 and 1776. COUNCIL OF SAFETY. Original Act of the General Assembly forming the Council of Safety, March 15, 1777, signed by John Hart, Speaker. A page from the Minutes of the Council of Safety, containing the minutes of Mar. 18 and 19, 1777. COSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION OF THE UNITED STATES IN 1 787. Original Report of Peter Tallman concerning Articles of Federation and Union of the States. Authenticated copy of the Report of the Annapolis Conven- tion, Sept. 14, 1786, forwarded to the New Jersey Legislature, as to its decision as to the best mode of formulating a plan of Government or Constitution of the United States. Petition of the Delegates from New Jersey to the Constitu- tional Convention in Philadelphia to the Legislature, June 1, 1787, asking to< be allowed to employ a secretary, messenger and doorkeeper. Original printed copy of the Constitution of the United States, transmitted to the Legislature by its delegates in the Constitu- tional Convention in 1787. Original copy of the Amendments proposed to be added to the Constitution in 1789, presented to the Legislature by the Congress of the United States. ACADEMIES AND COLLEGES. Petition by the Trustees of the Newark Academy to the Leg- islature, Nov. 11, 1794, for an act of incorporation. Petition to the Legislature in 1795 for a Lottery to complete the Academy in Nottingham. 54 Petition from the Trustees of the College of New Jersey (Princeton University) to the Legislature for a Lottery to raise $25,000 to establish a professorship in mathematics and astronomy. Petition of the College of New Jersey to the General Assem- bly, Jan. 2, 1 78 1, asking for a reduction in the quorum of Mem- bers of the Corporation, and relief for the damage done to the buildings by the enemy and by quartering the militia therein. BOUNDARY PAPERS. Agreement made between Daniel Coxe, Governor of West Jersey, and Robert Barclay, Governor of East Jersey, London, Sept. 5, 1688, determining the boundary lines between the two provinces. Manuscript Deed and Map, authorizing the survey for the boundary line between New Jersey and New York (New Jersey's Copy), dated July 25, 17 19. Brief of Claim on the part of New Jersey, and the proof offered in support of it, taken before Commissioners appointed by His Majesty, for settling the boundary line between that Province and New York; answers and objections thereto made by the Agents of New York, dated Sept. 28, 1769. Petition of the Eastern Proprietors to the Legislature, Dec. 6, 1783, praying that the Lawrence Line ran in 1743 be confirmed and made final, against all- controversies. Documents (19) relative to the boundary line between East and West Jersey between 1775 and 1796; being mostly petitions to the General Assembly. CHURCHES. Petition to the Legislature for a Lottery to build the Reformed Dutch Church of Bergen, 1794. Petition to the Legislature for a Lottery to complete the Pres- byterian Church in Caldwell, 1795. 55 . Petition to the Legislature for a Lottery in behalf of the First Presbyterian Church in Elizabeth. Petition to the Legislature for a Lottery to rebuild St. John's Church in Elizabeth, 1803. Petition to the Legislature by Col. Samuel Forman for a Lottery of his farm for the benefit of the Episcopal Church of Fort Monmouth, 1795. Petition to the Legislature for a Lottery to complete the Episcopal Church in New Brunswick, 1786. Petition to the Legislature for a Lottery to complete the Pres- byterian Church and Academy in Newton, 1801. Petition to the Legislature for a Lottery to rebuild the Protestant Episcopal Church in Perth Amboy, 1787. Vestry Minutes of St. Peter's Church at Perth Amboy, 1795- 1796. Petition to the Legislature for a Lottery to repair St. Peter's Episcopal Church at Spotswood, 1796. Petition to the Legislature for a Lottery to finish the Pres- byterian Church in Trenton, 18 12. . Petition to the Legislature for a Lottery to build an addition to the First Presbyterian Church of Woodbridge, 1793. civil officers. Return of officers elected in Hopewell Township, Hunterdon County, Mar. 2, 1761, and signed 'John Hart. Resignation of Abraham Clark as Clerk of the House of Assembly, June 11, 1766. Certificate of election of Joel Fithian, Sheriff, and James Ewing and Joshua Brick, Coroners, in Cumberland County, Aug. 11, 1776. Qualification of John Stevens as a member of the Legislature, Sept. 7, 1777. The Affirmations of Members of the General Assembly in 1 778-1 779. The bonds of John Stevens as State Treasurer, Dec. it, 1781, and Dec. 20, 1782. 56 Certificate of pay to Abraham Clark as a member of the Assembly, Dec. 23, 1784. Oath of Maskell Ewing as Clerk of the General Assembly, Oct. 26, 179a Letter of Richard Howell to the Legislature, Nov. 1, 1798, accepting the office of Governor. Letters of Joseph Bloomfield to the Legislature, Oct. 25, 1804, and Oct. 2j, 1809, accepting the office of Governor. Letter of Mahlon Dickerson to the Legislature, Oct. 27, 181 5, accepting the office of Governor. COURTS. Docket Book of the Supreme Court, March Term, 1763, to September Term, 1770. Docket Book of the Burlington County Court, June Term, 1765, to October Term, 1772. Docket Book of the Gloucester County Court, April Term, 1 761,. to April Term, 1765. Docket Book of Garret Van Houten, Justice of the Peace in Bergen Township, Bergen County, from July 4, 181 2, to Sept. 19, 1820. Record Book of cases for debt settled in court from June 13, 18 1 2, to June 8, 18 14, kept by the Clerk of the Court in Trenton, 300 pp. Application of Agnes Heard to the Middlesex County Court, July 21, 1 761, for license to keep a "Public House of Enter- tainment." Petition of certain lawyers to the General Assembly, May 30, 1765, praying that Frederick Smyth might be retained as Chief Justice. Petition of Justice John Berrien to the Governor, June 16, 1766, complaining of the Chief Justice appropriating all the fees of the Court. Petition from the Justices of the Supreme Court to the Legis- lature, Sept., 1779, praying that the Court may be fixed at some one place during the Revolutionary War 57 • Resignation of Joseph Bloomtiekl as Attorney-General of New Jersey, May 16, 1792. Resignation of Mahlon Dickerson as Justice of the Supreme Court, 181 5. Resignation of William Rossell as Justice of the Supreme Court (18—). ESTATES. Inventory of the Estate of Thomas Lambert, dated Feb. 24, 1703, and signed by Gov. Cornbury. Petition of Samuel Dick of Salem County, to the Legislature, Oct. 2, 1780, concerning the inheritance of Job Shreeve. 1 HIGHWAYS. Petition of the Inhabitants of the City and County of Burling- ton to the General Assembly, Nov. 25, 1747, for altering the road to Cooper's Creek. Petition of the Inhabitants of Essex County to the General Assembly, Feb. 14, 1764, in reference to opening a new road for traveling between Philadelphia and New York. Petition of the Inhabitants of Elizabethtown to the Legisla- ture, May 28, 1765, for a road through Bergen. MIUTIA. Petitions of several Captains of the Somerset Militia to the Committee of Safety, July 31, 1775, relative to fines for neglect of militia duty. Petition of Officers of several companies of Minute-men in Monmouth Count}' to the Committee of Safety, Sept. 29, 1775, recommending officers for commission. Memorial of Jonathan Phillips and Philip Moore, of Maiden- head, to the Committee of Safety, Oct. 16, 1775, offering services of the Minute-men. Memorial of Aaron Longstreet, of Middlesex County, to the Committee of Safety, Oct. 18, 1775, offering his services as captain. 58 Recommendation for Field Officers by the Militia of Cape May County to the Provincial Congress, Oct. 22, 1775. Memorial of Seth Bowen of Cumberland County to the Pro- vincial Congress, Dec. 1, 1775, offering his services as captain. Application of Benjamin Whitall of Woodbury to the Com- mittee of Safety, Jan. 10, 1776, for a command in Col. Max- well's regiment. Petition of William Clark of Burlington to the Committee of Safety, Jan. 11, 1776, for a lieutenancy. Memorial of Major Ephraim Anderson of Hunterdon County to the Committee of Safety, Jan. 12, 1776, for the appointment of Field officer in Maxwell's regiment. Petition of the Officers 2d Battalion of Cumberland County MiLitia to the "Provincial Congress, Jan. 16, 1776, recommending field officers. Petition of the Inhabitants of Newark to the Provincial Con- gress, Apr. 8, 1776, recommending Captain Wheeler to command a company of grenadiers. Recommendations of the Monmouth County Committee of Safety, Apr. 17/1776, favoring the appointment of Captain Still well to be appointed captain of the first company to be raised in the county. Warrant of Abraham Clark on the Treasurer, Apr. 18, 1776, for payment of arms and military stores. Letter from Joseph Borden to the Convention of New Jersey, Aug. 11, 1776, giving number of troops raised in Burlington County, with names of the captains. Petition of Captain Daniel Neill and officers of the Eastern Artillery Company to Gov. Livingston, Sept. 16, 1776. Letter from Gen. Matthias Williamson to Gov. Livingston, Sept. 21, 1776, relative to the condition of the Eastern Artillery Company. Instructions from the Legislature to the Commissioners ap- pointed for raising Four Battalions for service in the Continental Army, 1776. Letter from the Field Officers of the 3d Battalion of Middle- 59 sex County Militia to the Council of Safety, 1776, recommend- ing certain persons for commission. Petition of the Commissioned -Officers of the several regi- ments in Monmouth County to the Legislature, Feb. 21, 1777, praying that Col. David Forman may be appointed brigade com- mander. An order given by the Council of Safety to Major Samuel Hayes of Essex County, July 10, 1777, for the apprehension of certain disaffected persons. Letter from Gen. Silas Newcomb to Gov. Livingston, Aug. 20, 1777, giving an account of the capture by Major Ewing of certain persons of Downs Township, Cumberland county. Letter of Gov. Livingston to Gen. Silas Newcomb, Sept. 20, 1 yyy, containing certain military instructions. Letter from Gen. David Forman to Gov. Livingston, June 9, 1780, giving an account of the capture of Captain Barnes Smock and others. Instruction given by James Ewing, Auditor of Accounts, to John Little, Paymaster of the Gloucester Militia, Aug. 20, 1782. Remonstrance of the Officers of the New Jersey Brigade to the Legislature, May 23, 1783. Petition of Major John Conway to the Legislature, Nov. 13, 1783, relative to the settlement of his accounts, and the history of his company. Official List of the Enrolled Militia in the Lower Springfield Company, Burlington County, made Aug. 31, 1801. OATH OF ALLEGIANCE. Oath' of Allegiance to King George II. sworn to and sub- scribed by the mayor, common council, aldermen, and constables of Burlington between 1735 and 1758. Oath of Allegiance to the United States taken by certain citi- zens of Sussex County, 1787-8. Oath of Allegiance of the Judges and Justices of Passaic County on its formation in 1837, with dates of commission and the time they were severally sworn in. 6o PROVINCIAL AGENTS. Letter from Richard Partridge, English Agent of the Colony of New Jersey, London, Jan. 23, 1752, in reference to the sur- render of the government of New Jersey to the Crown in 1702. Accounts of Richard Partridge, English Agent of the Colony of New Jersey, with the Colony of New Jersey, Dec. 9, 1750, to Jan. 15, 1755. Order made in Council by Gov. William Franklin on the Treasurer, May 21, 1773, to pay Dr. Benjamin Franklin 25 pounds proclamation money for services as Agent of the Prov- ince of New Jersey at the Court of Great Britain. PUBLIC ACCOUNTS, Accounts of Samuel Tucker, Treasurer of New Jersey, Feb. 4, 1777. Public account rendered by Abraham Clark to Gov. Living- ston, Mar. 31, 1777. Account of John Cleves Symmes with the State of New Jer- sey for furnishing arms and clothing in 1777. Account rendered by Abraham Clark to the Treasurer of New Jersey, June 30, 1784, for his attendance as a Delegate in the Continental Congress from Nov. 15, 1782, to Oct. 31, 1783. Account of Josiah Hornblower with the State of New Jersey, Dec. 17, 1786, for his attendance in Congress. A letter from Abraham Clark to the Legislature, Oct. 20, 1 79 1, giving a detailed statement of the Public Accounts of New Jersey during the Revolutionary War. Account of Abraham Clark with the State of New Jersey, Oct. 22, 1791. Account of William S. Pennington against the State for serv- ices as Circuit Court Judge, May 11, 1805. RATABLKS, Return of the Ratables for Saddle River Township, Bergen County, Aug. 20, 181 1. 6i Return of the Ratables of the City of Perth Amboy, taken in July, 1786. REPORT. Report of the Commissioners for building the Secretary's Office at Perth Amboy, Oct. 8 to Dec. 2, 1762. Report of the New Jersey Commissioners appointed to quiet the mutiny in the New Jersey Brigade in January, 1781. Joint Report of the Commissioners of New Jersey and Penn- sylvania, settling the jurisdiction of the islands in the Delaware River, Dec. 2, 1785. slavery. Petitions (6) from the Inhabitants of Morris County to the Legislature, about 1800, asking the repeal of the Act of 1804 for the gradual abolition of Slavery. Petitions (6) from the Inhabitants of Bergen County to the Legislature, about 1806, asking the repeal of the Act of 1804 for the gradual abolition of Slavery. Petition from the Inhabitants of Burlington County to the Legislature, for an Act for the gradual abolition of Slavery in the State, dated 1796. Petition from the Inhabitants of Hunterdon County to the Legislature, for an Act for the gradual abolition of Slavery in the State, dated 1796. TORIES. List of suspected persons and Tories in Bergen County in 1776. Petition of Daniel Grandin .and other Tories in Salem goal to the Governor and Council, Mar. 19, 1777, asking for a speedy trial. Letter from Gov. Livingston to Major Samuel Hayes, July 10, 1777, furnishing the names of the disaffected persons to be apprehended by his command and returned to the Council of Safety. 62 Warrant given by Gov. Livingston for the arrest of suspected persons in Hunterdon County, July 31, 1777. Bond given to Gov. Livingston by Benjamin Barton of Sussex County, Aug. 29, 1777, agreeing to remain within two miles ot his house. Petition of Abraham Van Emburgh to the Legislature in 1789, that he might be relieved of the inquisition found against him in 1778. TOWN AND TOWNSHIP RECORDS. Proceedings of a Town Meeting held in Elizabethtown, Mar. 10, 1767, for appointing the Freeholders, Surveyors, and Over- seers of the Highways, Overseers of the Poor, and Assessors. Record Book of Mansfield Township, Burlington Couny, from Jan. 1, 1697, to Sept. 15, 1773. Minutes of the Town Meeting at Perth Amboy, Apr. 13, 1795. Record Book of Saddle River Township, Bergen Court*/, from 1789 to 1836. 300 pp. Treasury. Papers (10) relating to the robbery of Jonathan Whilledin on Nov. 3, 1773, of money collected for taxes of Cape May County, with depositions. Petition of certain prominent citizens of New Jersey to the General Assembly, Jan. 12, 1774, requesting the removal of Stephen Skinner, Treasurer of New Jersey, for shortage of his official accounts. Papers (9) relating^ to the robbery of Samuel Tucker, Treas- urer of New Jersey, by the British, Nov. 30, 1776. Containing his letter to the Legislature, Jan, 20, 1777, explaining the affair, with affidavits. Documents (7) relative to the robbery of the State Treasury in October, 1903, with depositions of various persons; and re- port of the Committee appointed by the Legislature. 63 MISCELLANEOUS. Sundry petitions to the Legislature by citizens asking to be re- imbursed out of Forfeited Estates for damages sustained in the Revolution; for clemency in the cases of several- Tories con- victed of treason and sentenced to be hung, etc. List of the Freeholders of Somerset County in 1753. Document appointing Joseph Woodruff "Water Bayliffe and Public Notary of the County of Salem," Aug. 26, 1703. Declaration by the Governor and Council denouncing the up- rising of the people against the Quakers, Sept. 8, 1682. General Return of the buildings in the State of New Jersey owned or rented by the United States, May 6, 1780. Warrant of Chief Justice Brearley to William Kelsey, Sheriff of Cumberland County, Dec. 1, 1780, for the arrest of Richard Howell, Attorney-at-law, for high treason. Petition of the Freeholders of Burlington County to the General Assembly, Nov. 23, 1775, asking to have a resolution passed to discourage Independency. M.1PQ1 WeS = ffljffl® Bb H££a3£s8£ rag ill