F 127 .N8 H2 Copy 1 Qass_ Book- NIAGARA FALLS: u PHYSICAL CHANGES, THE GEOLOGY AND TOPOGRAPHY THE SURROUNDING COUNTRY. 1- BY JAMES HALL, M State Geologist of New York ; Corresponding Member Bust. Soc. Nat. Hist., &c. [From the Boston Journal of Natural History.] ^'•A /?vy NIAGARA FALLS. The cataract of Niagara and the geology of the surround- ing country, have been often described ; but beheving that there are many facts unnoticed, and others which have not had due weight in these considerations, I shall venture a fur- ther attempt at illustrating some important points regarding this great finger post in the path of time. I am far from asserting that the problem regarding the recession or the for- mer condition of this great cascade is settled. So many dis- turbing causes are constantly jiresenting themselves, that al- though the great principles may be deemed established, yet it is impossible to calculate accurately the effect of these minor influences. Every fact recorded of the past, the present, or the future condition of this cataract will aid in the calculation of the final result, which, some thousands of years hence, may be made with tolerable accuracy. In the mean time we must content ourselves with observing these facts and laying down land-marks for the guidance of those who may follow us in the attempt to decide the eflect of time upon these an- cient rocks. A striking feature in the Topography of western New York, is the great diffei-ence of elevation between the Lakes Erie and Ontario, when taken in connexion with the generally level or but slightly uneven surface of the country, and where there are no disturbances among the strata. The difference of elevation between the other great lakes is comparatively small, although Superior is situated in a disturbed geological region. The elevation of Lake Erie is three himdred and thirtyfour feet above Lake Ontario, and the greater part of the difference is overcome by Niagara river in the sjjace of one mile at the rapids and falls. The barrier at the outlet of Lake Erie is formed by a ter- race of limestone which extends from the Hudson river, west- 4 HalVs Remarks on Niagara Falls ward far into Canada, forming for many miles the northern boundary of the lake. The southern slope of this terrace or platform of limestone passes off beneath the water, forming the bed of the lake. This terrace terminates abruptly on the north, within a short distance of the lake, and we descend into a low, level country, underlaid by marks and shales of the saliferous formation, which extend for a distance of fifteen or eighteen miles. Beyond this, there is an almost impercep- tible ascent for eight miles, when it suddenly plunges down about 250 feet, over the outcropping edges of various strata, which here terminate abruptly, to the low table land, border- ing Lake Ontario. From the base of this escarpment, the country slopes almost imperceptibly to the level of the lake, seven miles distant, and one hundred and twenty feet lower. A great portion of the country for twenty miles north of the first terrace, or that bordering Lake Erie, is so level that a rise of the Niagara river for thirty feet, would inundate an extent of thirty miles on both sides. After leaving the level country, the ascent, as before stated, is very gradual to the north ; but when we arrive at the edge of the great terrace of Lewiston and Q,ueenston, the elevation is thirtyeight feet above the level of Lake Erie. The general outline of this part of the country will be seen in the section from Erie to Ontario. This great terrace or platform is known in New York as the mountain ridge, and in Canada as Q,ueenston heights. It extends to the westward of Niagara river, beyond the head of Lake Ontario, and eastward beyond the Genesee river, where it merges in the general level of the country ; partially from the dip of the rocks in that direction, and partially from the thinning of some of its members. The abrupt termination of the various strata in the face of this cliff, prove conclusively the extent of denuding action upon this portion of the coun- try. The basin of Ontario, on the north of the terrace, has evidently been excavated from the sedimentary strata, the limit of deiuiding agency and that of the lake basin being the line of this escarpment. The edge of this escarpment is indented by numerous ravines or gorges, extending to a great- and the Geology of the Surrounding Country. 5 er or less distance ; they usually present a broad opening to the north, and terminate at a point within the first mile, and generally within a shorter distance. The streams now flow- ing in these ravines, evidently had little or nothing to do with their excavation, as the space is partially filled with drift, a deposit from another source. These indentations are doubtless in part the etfects of the great denuding agency which produced the escarpment, by undermining and remov- ing the different materials. It has been supposed by some, and Dr. Daubeny has adopted the opinion, that the terrace or escarpment at Lewis- ton was produced by a fault ; either an uplifting of all the strata on the sonth, or a downthrow of those on the north. Not having Prof. Daubeny's paper before me, I cannot state his arguments, but whatever they may be, they are certainly unsupported by facts. The strata are all visible in either di- rection, and there is no evidence of even the smallest disturb- ance. The strata, as they are exposed in the terrace of Lewiston and Q,ueenston, and in the banks of the river on either side, are exhibited in the section on the next page. There is here not only no evidence of a fault causing the difference in elevation, but direct proof to the contrary ; the soft marl and shale, forming the base of the cliff in the river banks, underlies the plateau from this place to Lake Ontario, and is visible, almost continuously, for the whole distance. On the other hand, there are the most unequivocal proofs of denuding action, and that the whole basin of Ontario is due to the excavating power. It will be seen that the character of the strata is such as to ofter great facilities for the operation of such an agent, consisting of alternating hard and soft beds. The action of water would undermine the harder, and leave them to fall by, their own weight, while the softer materials were removed. The denudation of such extensive districts, could only have taken p.lace while the country was submer- ged, and during the period of its elevation from beneath the ocean. This principle has been recognized by Mr. Hayes, in his description of the " Geology and Topography of Western im ma mmm j= a c 'O — "+i/roitsT3| 3 -C c to — ^ 1) s 1 ♦^ ai 0) o aj u o ^ '^ a C 1) o C^ a 1. a *^ ci 3 TS 0/ ^ in > i« 2 k« s^ ki o CB C a> o Cm E 2 Cu c5 c -3 a o T3 6 o CO 'S. re cis a; s 5 5 CO (^ i; 3 Cm X Cm ~ 5d Cm o O U O c -3 C o C o o c c Cm 3 _2 to •n ■s -«i c Hi re" 5 3 ■l C C «" o c a. a< Q e -a o 'i o J 5 a. a? ED ■f a. a - Eh R 3/ a. e 5 -e -s S " •~ ■~ »* d *^ C; a. a c tt, LevrtstoTi . JZ c o c - 5 J= >-] C" L.OivtuTicj S3 1 2 tt o a bu :i; Cm •JO 5; "e c a fe bD cn c ~ to z; 01 z; "o H s cu ^ ^ 3 Cm w ^ • "^ ~ bo O o 0/ =f) X 3 (m c .i: a a. 5 1 ci c o c 3 U C tt cs c "3 _o ^ c" 6 re 1 3 C £ i c "~ l_^ -C 's -3 i o re "2 5 re u a 3 be -y! o C z c/l o M> bfi -a (B 2 z 5 y (b 5 ^ O re re ^ 5 E a; 5b Cm o 01 re 5fl "sb c c 5 u 1 c to re re "re -^ £ O s 1 o X n .5 re a. ■s 3* 4i ~0 1> ^ - 5 <-J 2 ^v c 5d re c ^ <; Q CC J 4" r-i o 5 r? ■^ i.*^ CO I- 00 3b C-. — HalVs Remarks on Niagara Falls. 7 New York,"* By adopting this mode of explanation, we are enabled to account for the existence of this and similar terra- ces, along the lines of bearing of our extensive limestone formations, as well as for the deep valleys of ancient origin. The strata forming the escarpment at Lewiston, as seen in the section, are those through which the chasm of the Niaga- ra is excavated. The whole dip gradually to the south, and all below No. 8, disappear below the level of the river before reaching the falls, as may be seen by the dotted line bed which represents the surface of the river below the falls. The strata above this line are those excavated to form the channel of the river. The limestone forming the summit of the terrace, and at its margin not more than twenty feet thick, gradually in- creases from the addition of higher layers, till at the falls it has acquired a thickness of one hundred and twenty feet. This limestone, about one mile south of the falls, disappears be- neath the surface, and is succeeded by a soft marl of a bluish or greenish grey color, with purple bands. This formation, which is a continuation of the Onondaga saliferous group, occupies all the level country from two miles south of the falls, to Black Rock, a distance of eighteen miles by the course of the river. This is succeeded by the water limestone and Helderberg limestone group. The saliferous formation, occupying this great breadth of country, and forming an im- portant item in any calculation regarding the recession of the falls, has nevertheless always been overlooked by observers, and its existence in that part of the country was never noticed by any one, till the publication of the New York Geological Reports, in 1838. Previously, all the distance between the falls and Lake Erie was considered as underlaid by limestone ; and the limestone of Black Rock, or the Helderberg group, was placed immediately above the Niagara limestone, and represented as resting upon it. The Niagara river, in its escape from Lake Erie, has exca- vated a passage through the Helderberg limestone, (No. 10,) which forms the upper terrace before noticed, leaving a small • Am. Journal of Science, Vol. XXXV. No. I. 6 Hairs Remarks on Niagara Falls island, known as Bird's Island, in the midst of the stream. From Black Rock to within two miles of the great fall, the cliannel is excavated in the rocks of the saliferous group, the descent in this distance being only fifteen feet. About one mile south of the fall, the Niagara limestone approaches the surface, and forms the commencement of the rapids. The current, for the first two miles after leaving the lake, is very rapid ; after this distance, it flows on more gently, the channel gradually widening as far as Grand Island, where it is nearly two miles wide. It then divides, the greater quan- tity of water running on the west side of this island. There are several small, low islands in the river, above Grand Island, but this is far larger than all of them. Below this island the river expands to a width of two or three miles, and presents all the appearance of a quiet lake with small, low islands. Approaching the rapids, the river narrows, and the current becomes more rapid, and for about one mile before reaching the grand cascade, rushes on with inconceivable velocity, over a declivity of fifty two feet, to the edge of the precipice, where it is precipitated into a gulf one hundred and sixty feet below. The chasm through which the Niagara river flows, from this point to its emergence into the low country at Lewiston, is excavated in the rocks represented in the section, Nos. 7 and 8 only being visible at the falls, the others rising succes- sively from beneath the water, owing to the declivity of the bed of the river, and the ascent of the rocks to the northward. The sides of this chasm present almost perpendicular walls, with a talus at the bottom, formed by the falling of some of the higher masses. The outlet of this chasm, where the river emerges into the plain at Lewiston, is scarcely wider than elsewhere along its course. In some places the river flows in a channel of less than two hundred yards across, and again is expanded to twice that width. The breadth of the chasm across the top, is nearly twice that of the channel or stream at the bottom. The declivity of the bed of the river, from the falls to Lewiston, is one hundred and four feet, or nearly fifteen feet to the mile, which gives great velocity to the and the Geology of the Surrounding Country. 9 stream. At one place, however, about a mile below the fall, and where the channel is narrowest, the stream glides along with comparative quiet, while below this, where the channel is broader, it is thrown into great confusion. Again, below the whirlpool the surface of the river is more smooth, and the current more gentle, though the channel is narrower than above. The cause of these appearances, which have seemed inexplicable upon the common theory, and have been used as arguments against the recession of the falls, is to be sought in the geological structure of the place. It will be seen that below the whirlpool there are no hard rocks in the bed of the river, and consequently the channel is deeper than where such rocks exist. At the whirlpool, and above that place, the hard sandstone. No. 2, is at and near the level of the river, and consequently the channel is not worn so deep. Again, after this hard mass has dipped beneath the surface, the channel is excavated in softer rocks ; hence the narrow channel and smooth water a mile below the falls. Near the falls, the higher beds of sandstone and the Protean limestone come to the level of the river, and thus cause a wider, shallow channel, and more tumultuous water. Such, simply, I conceive to be the explanation of the variable width of the chasm, and the greater or less violence of the water. Upon the west bank of the river, at the whirlpool, there is a depression, and a deflection in the course of the river to the right, as will be seen by referring to the map. Standing upon the east bank of the river, this depression has the ap- pearance of having been worn by the eddying current of the stream ; but on farther investigation it proves to be of differ- ent origin. During a recent visit, in company with Mr. Lyell, Ave examined this place, and found it to be an ancient gorge, filled with drift, except a narrow ravine through which a small stream flows into the river. This stream may be traced in a north-west direction for two miles, where it comes to the level of the surrounding country. In one or two places, near the river, the bed of this stream has laid bare the rocks, which proves that they are not excavated so deeply as the bed of the Niagara. From the termination of this ravine, upon 2 10 HalVs Remarks on Niagara Palls the table land, going in a north-west direction about one mile, we commence descending through another deep gorge, which terminates upon the plateau at the base of the escarpment, at St. Davids. It will be perceived, by referring to the map, that the course of the river before coming to the whirlpool, if con- tinued in the same direction, would lead to St. Davids. From this fact it has been inferred that there is a continuous ancient ravine, filled with drift, from the whirlpool to this place. This most remarkable fact has been cited as a strong objection to the theory of recession by the action of the river upon its own bed. Still, however, I hope to show that its existence is equally an objection to the chasm having been produced by the action of the sea. If this ravine be continuous from the whirlpool to St. Da- vids, and existed previous to the excavation of the Niagara channel to Lewiston, it seems natural to suppose that it would have taken that direction. If we suppose that the undermining agency of the ocean, aided by the stream, exca- vated the Niagara chasm, why would not the same agency have cleared out this ancient ravine ? And if it be assumed that the stream had commenced flowing by way of Lewiston, then we require nothing more to account for the commence- ment of the chasm. The assumption that the sea excavated the present channel of Niagara, does not aid in the difficulty of explaining why the ancient ravine of St. Davids was not cleared out ; but on the other hand, the existence of that ravine, filled with drift, is a strong argument that the Niagara did excavate, of itself chiefly, its present channel. For had the sea remained long enough after the filling of this ravine with drift, to excavate that of Niagara, it would have removed a portion at least of it, and have drained the water in that di- rection. We can scarcely conceive it possible that this ravine could have been filled with drift, by any means, while such a stream as the present Niagara river was flowing through it, and if it has, at any time, been a large water course, there must have been a cessation of the stream during the time of this filling up. The most rational explanation, ar.d the one most consonant and the Geology of the Surrounding Country. 1 1 with existing facts, appears to me to be, that the ravine of St. Davids was excavated by the power of the waves, aided prob- ably by a stream, though it may have been a very insignificant one\ That this ravine was formed previously to the period of the drift, and that during this time it became filled with the transported materials to such an extent that the stream after- wards was unable to excavate a channel through the mass. Under these circumstances, the water would find an outlet at the lowest point, into the basin of Ontario ; whether that point were over a surface of rock or of drift, and after the channel was once commenced, it would go on deepening, un- less some violent change should alter the configuration of the surface. Now there is no evidence of such a change in the Niagara district, and it seems more rational to conclude that the stream, which may have formerly found its way through the ravine of St. Davids, after the filling up of that channel, took the course by Lewiston, that being the lowest point at which it could find a passage to the lower country on the north. It may be necessary, perhaps, to suppose a depression in this direction before the water would flow there ; and such a depression may have existed from causes in operation previ- ously, or there may have been an indentation in the edge of the terrace at this place, like those farther east, near Lockport. There appears, indeed, strong reason for supposing that there was a depression in the surface at the place where the river now flows, before the deep channel was excavated ; there is a general depression on either side, and a transverse section of the river would present the appearance represented in the an- nexed diagram. The recent deposit, forming Goat Island, is upon a surface lower than the top of the rapids, indicating removal of the 12 HalVs Remarks on Niagara Falls surface rock to some extent, before the period of that form- ation. I will now proceed to consider, first the objections to the theory that this ravine was produced by the combined action of the stream and the waves of the sea ; and next the argu- ments in favor of the hypothesis that the river has excavated its own channel, or by far the greater portion of it. Examples are not unfrequent where the closing up of an outlet by drift, has caused the excavation of a new channel through solid rock. Perhaps the best illustration of this fact occurs in the passage of the Genesee river from the upper to the lower valley, from Portage to Mount Morris. The river, flowing from the south as far as Portage, is suddenly turned around to the opposite direction, and then again turns to the north, cutting its channel for about two miles through solid rock, in some parts to the depth of three hundred and fifty feet. At the end of this chasm it emerges into a more an- cient valley, and at a point which would communicate with the river at Portage, before its deflection, by less than half the distance which it has required in its present course to reach this place. Now had this short space been occupied by a bluff" of rock, we should easily have found an explanation of the reasons why the river did not pursue a direct course. But what are the facts ? This shorter space, intervening between the two portions of the channel, is occupied by a deep deposit of drift, rising higher than the surface of the rocks where the river has found its channel. In the process of examination and excavation for the Genesee valley canal it has been found that this drift is of great depth, extending even beloAV the level of the present bed of the river. The question presents itself, why did not the stream remove the gravel and sand, and make itself a channel in the shortest direction, instead of going twice as far through rocky strata ? Or if we advance the argument that this chaimel was excavated in part by the aid of the sea, why did not this undermining agency aff'ect this deposit of sand and gravel ? The truth is incontroverti- ble that many streams have excavated their channels to great depths in rocky strata, long after the ocean left the surface. and the Geology of the Surrounding Country. 13 Passing lower down on the Genesee river, there are other places where the stream has left the old channel, now filled with drift, and formed a new one, through rocky strata ; and finally, at Mount Morris, it emerges into another ancient val- ley from a narrow gorge bounded by mural escarpments. It would be absurd to assert, that broad valleys, with sloping sides, filled, or partially filled with drift, are of the same age, or due to the same agency, as the narrow, deep valleys or chasms with clean, rocky embankments, and containing no other loose materials than those arising from the adjacent rocks. Similar examples may be found in the outlets of Seneca and Cayuga Lakes, which flow into Lake Ontario. Now the course of these outlets is not in a direct line north to the lake, but from Seneca it turns to the eastward, excavating its course through the limestone and gypsum beds, between that lake and Cayuga. From all examinations I have made, there appears to be an ancient valley, filled with drift, between the northern end of Seneca Lake and Ontario ; and yet, notwith- standing this, the stream has excavated harder materials, and taken a much more circuitous route to Lake Ontario. The same explanation may be given of Canandaigua and the outlets of other lakes. As an analogous case, we may compare the ravine of St. Davids and the whirlpool, with that of Iroijdequoit, a few miles east of Rochester. The Genesee river, after leaving the gorge at Mount Morris, flows in the bottom of an ancient valley to within a short distance of Rochester, where it enters a new channel. This channel is narrow, with almost perfect mural banks, and nowhere contains deposits of drift. On the lake shore, about two miles east of the mouth of the Genesee, we find a broad and deep ravine, known as the Iroudequoit bay. This ravine is excavated to an unknown depth below the level of Lake Ontario. The Iroudequoit creek which takes its rise in the southern part of the county, flows through this ravine for a few miles before reaching the lake. This ravine presents a very diflerent appearance from either that of the Genesee below Rochester, or of the Niagara, and no one could suppose that the present stream had ever excavated such 14 HalVs Remarks on Niagara Falls a channel. At tlie lake shore, it has a broad opening with sloping sides, and appears much like a bay worn by the action of the sea, while perhaps a stream was flowing in at the same place. It appears very natural to suppose that this may at one time have been the continuation of the ancient valley of the Genesee, which was commenced south of Dansville, and continued northward as the land was upraised above the sea. Now had the sea ever washed the base of the cliffs at Lew- iston long enough to allow of the excavation of this gorge of the Niagara, we should find some evidence of its sojourn there, in the shape of a beach, or rounded pebbles ; but we find nothing of the kind. The continuance of a line of coast of sea or lake may be determined comparatively by the charac- ter of the materials along its margin ; whether they are com- pletely rounded, or still much angular ; or if rounded, whether the forms are very much flattened. But in the case before us we find nothing at a greater elevation than the ridge road, or lake ridge, which, from its nature and contained remains, must have been the boundary of an ancient lake. Other examples might be cited, but these appear to me suf- ficient as an explanation of causes why the Niagara did not take its course from the whirlpool through the ravine filled with gravel, rather than excavate a new channel from the rock. We come now to the consideration of the argument that the chasm of Niagara has been worn by the sea, previous to, or during the elevation of this part of the country above its level. In the absence of direct proof, we must resort to anal- ogy, and relying on this mode, we find that all indentations or ravines, excavated in the face of sea cliffs, have a broad or trumpet-mouthed opening toward the sea, and recede abruptly to a point. They never present a long, narrow ravine, of equal width ; and when of a length at all approaching Ni- agara, they have an opening many times broader than this at Lewiston. I might cite numerous examples of ravines exca- vated by the sea, aided by a stream coming in at right angles, but none of these are of the character of Niagara. In such cases they are broad enough to allow the stream to flow and the Geology of the Surrounding Country. 15 through the bed, leaving waterworn materials along the sides, monuments of the wearing action of the waves. In the Niagara chasm there are no pebbles, boulders, or gravel ; the river occupies nearly the whole width at the bottom, allowing a talus of angular fragments of the rocks fallen from above. The valley of the Genesee, from Rochester to Dansville, affords a good example of a ravine excavated during the emergence of land from beneath the sea ; but this valley is broad, and partially filled with drift, the sides sloping gradu- ally and for the most part covered with deep soil, partially from decomposition and disintegration of the rocks beneath, but principally from trans])orted materials. The small amount of wearing accomplished by a stream during the period of our observation might incline us to doubt the possibility of any body of water having excavated its channel backwards for a length of seven miles, and to a depth of from three to five hundred feet. But if the period of one life be sufficient to admit of observation proving the smallest amount of recession, then it is only requisite that we should carry on the process for an indefinite period, to accom- plish the utmost that we require ; or, that we extend back- ward our imagination regarding time, in order to prove what is already accomplished. Now it is attested, within the re- corded observations of those residing in the vicinity of Niaga- ra, that the falls have receded within their recollection. If then it is proved that this ravine could not have been excava- ted by the sea during the emergence of the land, we have •< declivity in the bed of the river below Lake Erie, Which- ever way it may occur it will make no material difference in the great result, which will be either a continuous rapid stream from Lake Erie to Lewiston, or a rapid stream with a fall at the outlet of Erie. If present causes continue to ope- rate as now, such will be the consummation, the finale, of the grand cataract of Niagara. It is unnecessary here to follow on this recession gradually from the outlet of Lake Erie to the final drainage of a great portion of its waters. The views which have been enter- tained of the sudden drainage of this or any of the upper lakes, and a deluging of the country on the north and east are no longer considered as tenable by any one, and even if Lake Erie could be drained suddenly, it would cause no deluge of any importance. If the whole lake were at once placed upon Lake Ontario, it would only elevate its surface by about one hundred and fifty feet, so that its extent would scarcely exceed the limits of the ancient lake ridge, and the outlet would still be the valley of the St. Lawrence. In calculating the future recession of Niagara falls, there are many disturbing influences to be considered. At the present time, by means of the Erie and Welland canals, large quantities of water, which formerly flowed over the fall, are returned to Lake Ontario by other than the natural channels. The Illinois canal, at the southern extremity of Lake Michigan, will drain a large amount of water in that direction, which will find its way to the ocean through the Mississippi river and Gulf of Mexico, Extensive improvements have been 28 HalVs Remarks on Niagara Falls contemplated at the falls, and the erection of manufactories, by which great quantities of water from above the rapids will be returned to the Niagara channel below the falls. Thus far the country supplying water to the upper lakes has been but little changed by the hand of cultivation, the piimeval forests still cloihe the surface, and evaporation to a gieot extent is prevented. This cannot always remain so ; the advancing settlements will yet penetrate even the wilderness bordering Lake Superior, and the opening of the sarfuce to the influence of the sun's rays will greatly diminish Uie supply of water flowing into the tributaries. These causes will sensibly di- minish the quantity passing down the natural outlet ; and the mighty Niagara, the " Thunder of Waters,'''' is destined to be at certain seasons but a diminutive representative of its former grandeur. Note. Since writing the foregoing paper, I have referred to some notes and correspondence with Mr. FiO]^, Government Engineer at Toronto, U. C. From levels which he has made from Lake Ontario to the (iueenslon heights, at several places, he says the crest of the terrace constantly declines going westward from the river, while the base continues at the same elevation. This fact is opposed to information I had before received, and to the general belief. If this be substantiated, and I have every reason to believe the statement, it may ma- terially alter the reasoning in regard to ihe former recession, of the falls, and the manner in which the chasm has been excavated. From the Niagara river there is a declinption of the crest of the terrace eastward, so that at Rochester its summit is about sixtyfive feet below the level of Lake Erie ; giving in this direction a descent of about one hundred feet in eight v miles.* I have no data for determining the rate of declination wester- ly, but whatever it may be, it proves the coarse of the Niagara to be upon or near the highest part of this terrace. If this inequality of the surface was produced by some force after ' See New York Geological IlHports. and the Geology of the Surrounding Country. 29 the strata became consolidated, there might have been pro- duced a rent in this direction, as in the diagram which repre- sents a transverse section. This may iiave been the first cause of directing the water in its present channel, which was afterwards widened by the river. There seems some reason to suppose this may have been the case, from the general direction of the chasm, being at right angles wifh the stiike of the strata. If this be true, however, the fissure must have been extremely narrow, and still have left lo the river the work of excavation, though under very different circumstances. The reasoning in regard to the existence of p depression previous to the excavation of a deep channel, will still hold true, as well as that regarding the fresh water deposits, and (he terrace extending to the whirlpool. The future recession of the cataract cannot be affected in auy manner by this fact, for if such a rent ever existed, it seems i)ot to have extended as far as the present site of the falls, for all ilie testimony is to the effect that the process of retrogression goes on by the action of the water upon the shale, which undermines the limestone. If there was a fissure in the course of the Niagara, it did not reach so deep as the bed of the river, for it seems quite certain that the thick bed of sandstone (No. 2, of section,) has never been excavated very deeply below the present surface of the river. If these views regarding the elevation of the terrace are found to hold true, it will aid in establishing the opinion be- fore expressed, that the present channel of Niagara is of recent date. I have long believed that the former outlet of the great Lakes was by the western end of Lake Ontario, though I have not been able to make investigations to the extent desired in order to establish that opinion. The period when the disturbance of the strata took place, is one of great importance, and may aid in determining the comparative age of the Niagara channel, and the period of the drift. That the former was subsequent, however, does not admit of doubt. I am not aware how far the terrace contin- ues to decline westward from the Niagara river, but it is quite certain that the limestone rises before going as far west as the 30 Perkins^ Remarks on Fossil Bones head of Lake Erie ; for we find crossing this lake near its western extremity, an anticlinal axis which extends northward into Canada, and southward entirely across the State of Ohio. Now this may have happened at the same period as the disturb- ance or uplift, further east, and the production of this western axis may have resulted in turning the course of the outlet, and the formation of the Niagara river ; but more facts are required before any speculations can be offered upon this subject. LIBRARY OF CONGRESS e 014 221 264 ft