E 340 .B6 T8 Copy 1 A rillBIITE TO JAMES G. BIRNEY. One generation lias passed away sitiet; Jamks U. Biknkv attempted u> show that the enslaving of men, as an institution could npt be safely tolerated in a repuMiean o-ovoninient. There were peculiarities in his history that make his case eminently an illustration, in the treatment exhibited toward him, of the powerful and almost irresistible influence that slaveholders had acquired in society, in the church, in politics, and in the control of the government in Northern as well as Southern States. They will also shew that such opposition as he elicited, was not excited by anything unacceptable, in himself, person- ally, but was owing to the fact that he ainiouiiced truths, for which the ])ublic mind was not then prepared. It is the purpose of this article, by brief allusion to incidents occurring in the cai'eer of Jamrs Gr. Biuxey, to illustrate the remarkable hold slavery pos- sessed upon the regards of the people of the United States, and how difficult has been the task to diminish the deference almost universally entertained for it. In order to show that the treatment exhibited toward him as a public man, was an expression of the influence of slavery, it will be necessary to make some reference to his antecedents, and social position. James G. Bikxev was a native of Kentucky. His father, through applica- tion to business, and by- contracts with the government, for furnishing supplies to the ariny, during the war of 181*2, had acquired a large estate. Woodland, his residence, in the vicinity of Danville, had celebrity as one of the most attractive sites in the State. Having only tAVo children, he spared no expense in their education. His daughter married John J. Marshall, an eminent law- yer at Frankfort, and afterwards, for many years, Chancellor at Loui.svillc, Kentucky. The earl}' education of the son was under the tutox'age of Mr. Priestly. Subsequently lie was transferred to Transylvania University at Lexington, Ky., thence to Nassau Hall, at Princeton, N. J. At this latter institution, James G. Biruey was graduted in 1810, being regarded as one of the most proficient linguists of his class. To accomplisii him in the study of the law, he was en- tered as a student in the law office of 3Ir. Dallas, of Philadelphia, wiiere he spent two years. After traveling extensively, he entered upon the practice of the law at Dan- ville, his native place. Within the following two years ho was elected u member of the LegiglatUre of Kentucky. His marriage to Miss McDowell, allied him to a large oonnectiou, both in Kentucky and Virginia. He soon after removed to Huntsville, Alabama, where he gained an enviable position in his profession, and enjoyed the fruits of a lucrative practice. He was elected Solicitor General for the State, and was ofi"ered a seat upon the Bench. His partner, iii the law, tbr several years, was the Hon. Arthur P. Hopkins, subsequently Judge of the Supreme Oourt of Alabama, and United iStates Senator from the same State. 2 A THIHITK TO .lA.MKS li. BIHNK^. Wlicu tJiiliii (^. Adiiiiih was noiiiiiiutod for tho Presideucy in 1828, Jamiw (t. Biriu\v vins Hclertt'd h\ tin- Wilis jiarty of Alabama as one of the Pre«iden tial Kloetors for that State. Having' made a jirofe.ssioii of religion. Jic became au active member of the Prettbvteriau Chureli, and exerted an extensive influence as an elder in that •lenominatioji, the more so. perhap.s. from haviiii;- been previously rofrarded a.s altogether a man of tin- worltl. IK inhoritanee and purchase, he became the owner of slaves, and had a oot ton ]>iautation earried on und«'r his direction. After his mind became engageil upon the subject of slavery us a question of morals, he \vnn solicited by the American Colonization Society, to accept the .«?sipjii, Arkansas and Louisiana. While thus engaged he wa« tre.-ited with every manifestation of popular favor. When traveling through the district a free juuwage. accompanied by every courtesy was tender- ed him upon all ]>ublic conveyances. Funds were placed in his hands, for the purpose of fitting out a vessel to sail from New Orleans freighted with Colon- ists for Liberia. He had. by these opportunities, abundant means of forming an opinion ;ls to the future efiect of colonization upon the permanency of slavery. At the earnest entreaty of liis aged father, he returned to Kentucky, to be Jiear hiin during his declining years. Here at his native place, he was offer- ed the Professorship of Belles Lettres and Political Economy, in Centre Col- lege, an institution sustained by tlie Presbyterian Churcli of Kentucky. This he declined chiefly for the reasoit, that he was thou interesting himself in organizing into an a.ssociation, those in Kentucky who were in favor of gradual emancipation. Having known Henry Clay from boyhood, he sought in stiveral interviews, his co-operation, but although receiving expression of .sympathy from him in private conversation, he failed to obtain any avowal publicly in favor of the plan. T'jMiii giving the subject longer and more mature consideration, his mind reached the conclusion, tiiat the doctrine of innnediate emancipation was the only adeijuate remedy for the system of slavery. No sooner IkuI he adojited tliis conviction, than he had all the slaves upon his farm, and in his hou.sehold assembled, and informed them that he had exe- cuted deeds of nninumission, for each and all of them, that they would be recorded, ami the bonds re(|uircd filed, .so that they would no longer be slaves, but freemen and free women. He further informed them, that from that time, to BO njany as preferred to remain Avitli him, he would pay wages for their ser- vices, and they wordd be regarded and treated as hired persons. H(' then called ujKtn a clergyman present, to a.sk the blessing of (rod upon the act. Hereupon the entire hoiiseliold. white and black, kiudt in worship, and the sob.s and responses ! of the negroes made indeed an impressive scene. Coming, at the s;une lime, to the conclusion, that colonization was inade- iiuate as u renu-dy for slavery, he resigned his position as Vice-President of tne State Society, and in a letter to the Secretary, gave his reasons at length for doing ho. Tiie concluding paragrajdi of that letter is as follows: " IVrniit nil-, in cnnchisioii, to siiy that tlie views siiliniiUed in this eoinmuiiicatioii, an* enliejudiccs that slavery t>pn<'i»--an H. I!IJ!\KK 3 all the trad I li;ul li-ii. Wlieii 1 vciiieinlxMi'il liow i;iliiily ;ui(l disp.-i.ssiotiately iiiv iiiiiul lias proceeded from one Initli coiiiicdiMl with llii.s suhjecl id niiolhrr still iuyiier,"— that lh« opinions F have embrncd iirc those to whiili such minds iuid heiirls as WiU)erf'orce'.s and Clarkson's yielded their full assent— that they are the ojunions of the disinterested and excellent of our own country; I feel well salislied that my conclusions are not tlie fruits of enthusiasm. When I recur to my own observation through a life already of more tlian forty years — of the anti-republican tendency of slavery — and take up our most solemn State paper, and there see that all men are created equal, and have a rijjht that is aliena- ble to life, liberty and the ])ursuir of liapjjine.ss ; I feel a settled conviction of mind thof. Slnveni, as it cxista (imon \-ery essence of our f?overmnent, and that by prolongiuii it. we aic //>,'w/ (/u).-// tb,. toniKhition principles of onr happy institutions.'' '• But one word more. Tlie views contained in this letter are my own, and they have been the result of my own rcadina, observation and thouglif. 1 am a member of 710 anti- slavery .society, nor have ] any acquaintance, either personally or by literary correspond- ence, witli any of theNorfheiu abolitionists. No one. besides myself, is committed to any thintr 1 liave .said." Tlio llev. J)r. Cox, of New York, coiinneuting upon tltis letter said : •' A liirney lias shaken the continent by ))ulti7\ii down his foot : and his fame will b^ envied before Ins arguments are answered or tlieir forci> for£ott,en." The seiitinient that iniliieiiced his couolusioiis is shown^by the followin^^- extract from another letter published at that time. "Any jilau of eraanc,ii)ation, however i>radual it mi better, than per- petual slavery; but surely it is the gi-eat desideratmn of any jjlan, that it leave the parties friends as freemen . None will etiect this, wiiich is not founded on Christian principle — and there can be none, so far as I can see, which so fully recognize.s Christian principle, as its basis, as that which urges iiumcdiate emancipation." When triving his impression of what would be the ettect practically of thJH doctrine, he adds : ■'There would be no danuer of personal violence to the. master from emancipation brought about by Christian benevolence. Such an apprehension is the refuge of con- scious guilt. Emancipation brought about by the principles above meiuioned,°I hesitate not to say, would in most instances, where superior intelligence of the master was acknowledged. produc(> on the ])art of the beneficiaiies, the most entire and cordial obedience to his counsel and friendship. 1 do not believe that I have any warmer friends tJian my manumitted slaves, none, I am sure, if sacrifices were called for, "who would more freely make them, to promote my haj)piness.'' Speaking of the effect of such action, in his own ctise, he says : • My own manumitted slaves, at the end of tlie first year of their eniiiloyinent on wages, will have used but half the amount they are entitled to receive. They have not fallen into disorderly or vagrant habits, but have manifested, at least the younger ones, an increased desire for knowledge and for attendance on the sabbath schools, and the common ministrations of the sanctuary." *" What to-day is the position of the men, who for the i)ast thirty years, have worked to bring our practice into conformity with the principles of the* government ? And who in the stmggle against established and powerful interests, have accepted political disability and humiliated lives ? Have any of those been put in governing places, where their proved fidelity, would guarantee the direct execution of what i.s to-daj' the nearly unanimous will of the people? Certainly not yet. So far the virtue of Reformers is its own reward. While yet living their mantles have fallen upon the .shoulders of others to whom you have given high position, but they are .still laboring in narrow paths, — broadening, to be sure, and brightening, — for the lougli ground is pas.sed and the sun of victory is already rising. We give deep sympathy and honor to the men who in tlie interests of civilization, .separated them.selves from' mankind to penetrate the chill solitudes of the arctic regions. Tlunr names remain an added con - stellation in polar .skies. But we know that bitter skies and winter winds are not so unkind as man's ingratitude. And why then, do we withhold symjiatliy and honor from these men who have so unflinchingly trod their isolated jiaths of s-elf appointed duty accepting political and social excommunication — these heroes of the moral solitud«H."' — Frmn addresa of ffm Fremmit. Fel. 2df/'. 1864, .Y. Y. 4 A IKIItlTK To .lAMK.- C. ItlUNKV. TRKATMK.NT IN A SLAVE STATK. Feeling, tliat unless nuch views were generally aceepted, the true glory, of his eountry must lie eclipsotl by the growiufr magnitude of slavery, he deter- mined to devote himself to their dissemination in the midst of those whom they were designed to intluenee. lie did not seek to go North where the risk miriMciitl('s, the rcbuko of tyiants. the refuse of the ()ppres.sed."' When the fact l)ccame known thatMr. Hirney had freed his slaves, it was regarded by neighboring slaveholders as satisfactory evidence of his earnestness, and there was innnediately au entire change of feeling toward him. It was altogether allowable for him while he held slaves, to say what he pleased upon the subject, but the moment his theiny was converted into practice, he was regarded as a dangerotis member of society. '^ Learning that he had provided press and type, and engaged a printer to give publicity to his views, slaveholders a.ssembled in mass meeting in the town of his residence, ami pledged themselves to use every means in their power, whether ]ieaceable or violent to jireveut their publication. Having known him from childhood, they felt asstired that he did not lack the courajje necessary to carry out iiis plans. The meeting appointed a committee to address him a letter of remonstrance. This they did on the 12th of July, 1835. They following extract shows the spirit by which they were actuated : • We addross you now in the calmness and candor that should characterise law abiding men, a« willii)er of the bar moved the Court, that the nain(! <»f James (!. Birneybe expunged from the roll of attorneys of that (.'ourt, as unworthy to renuiin there longer. And although Judge lIo})kins, his former partner and bosom friend, was the Presi- dent Judge, he had not courage to say aught in objection, or to express a word in extenuation, and ordered the moticui to be granted. While lie was resident in Alabama, the University of that State was or- ganized upon an endownnent of remarkable liberality. On account of his reputation as a classical scholar, and the interest lu; had uniformly shown in the cause of education, Mi-. J^irney wiis commissioned by the Trustees to visit the New England States and form the acquaintance of literary men, with the view of selecting competent professors for the several dcpartnu^nts of the University, lie did so. and the President and Professors of that institution were elected to their several posts, chiefly upon his reconnuendation. He had frequently attended upon examinations and taken an active part in pronu)ting its welfare, being a ruembei- of tlie Board of Trustees. The literary societies connected with it, had cho.seu him as one of their honorary members. But no sooner did they hear that lie had given liberty to slaves, than they hastened to pass resolutions declaring him unworthy of such nunnbership, and expelled him. In Northern Alabama a large meeting was held about the same time, for the purpose of denouncing Mr. Birney. They appointed a vigilance commit- tee to inflict blows and death upon the objects of their vengeance, wherever they may lay their lawless hands upon them. Of this committee, more than one-third Avere described as professed Christians, belonging to three of the leading denominations in our country, one of whom was a Baptist minister. This committee took special pains to communicate these proceedings to Mr. Birney. The following is an extract from the answer whicli he publislied and sent them : "In tliis reply, which after no Imnied rellectioii, I liave thought projier to make to your proceedings' 1 shall take lint little time in noticing what wa.s done that \\'as .strictly personal to myself. I \\ill stop only long enough to remind you — especially that portion of you who profess to he followers of Christ — of the unjust impression you have attempted to make on those to whom I am a stranger, by associating me, in ynur jnoceedings, with [/am- blers, blacklegs, and sus]ii(?ious characters. It is well known to you all. that with laborious diligence I prosecuted in your county, and with no mean success, a ]>rofession aribious in it.s duties, and to a conscientious mind, beset with difticuteies and teniiitalioiis. To the gener- ousness of my jiractice the bar will testify, and with i)arties and Avituesses bear record to ray exemptions from the petty tricks and advantages which bring the profession into disre- pute. Ki]Owiug nie by an ac(inaintance of many years, as you did, in my profession — as a member of the church — as a citizen — you have tried to i)roduce an impression you knew to be unjust and injurious. As christians, and as geiitlenicn, now that you liave had time for reflection, vfni sliould be sorry for it. and asliamed of it. HIS TREATMENT IN A FREE .STATE. The tnregoing incidents tend to show what kind of treatment slaveholders were disposed to manifest to oiu; who loft their ranks, and how they regarded conduct, designed practically, to exemplify the teachings of the Declaration of Independence. His reception by men of the North will )iow be adverted to. Having lost his printer, in his native State, remlering it impracticable to carry out his design as to the publication of his views there, he concluded to seek the protection of the constitution of the free State of Ohio, which guar- antees to her citizens, freedom of speech and of the press. A TKIBI TK TO .1 A M i;?: li. IIIKSKV. Hl' reiiuived liis resilience to (.'iiiciiiuati. He liiid scarecly put his domicil in order, before lie was assured upon all Iiaiuls that so imperative was the sway of Southern inlluenee in that eity, that he could not, for a day, jiublish a paper that would oppose slavery. Not desirous of seeming rash in facing opposition that seemed irresistal)le. he, at greatly inerea.sed ex))ense and inconvenieuce, made arrangements for the jiuhlication of the paper at the town of New Rich- moud, on the Ohio river, twenty miles above Cincinnati, lor the purpose of giving an example of the spirit and manner with which he designed to conduct the discussiun nf that subject which tht^n scMMiicd almost impossible tn allude to without a'Mtatiiiir tin" public mind. After the paper had received very general commendation for tlic excellent spirit with which the sulijcct was discu.ssed. he cimcluded to romoAc the press to (/incinnati. He had not been there long before the men of proj)erty and standing united in saving that it must be suppressed b}^ all means, right or wrong, peaceably m- forcibly. He contended for his constitutional right to speak and write. The report nf the First Anniversary of the Ohio Anti-Slavery Society, held A])ril, 1^8(), sh«tws that Mr. ]?irney offered the following resolution : '■ That ill order to porpotnate our tree institutions, the .siibjoct of slavery oniibt to be fully discu.ssed liy tlic iion-shivelioldint: States." With a view to itiflame the public mind, and increase the excitement, it was stated at a large jmblic meeting in ('incinnati, that Mr. JJirney had agreed that he would not establish a paper in tliat city. In a letter of the date of July, 1880. he replied to this statenu^nt, in the following niaimer : " I do not hold myself accountable foreiroiieous impressions which others may receive, when i have not desiorned to make them. In this, no reasonable jieison will ditier with nie. Now, sir, I have on no occa.sion ii>ed wonls, which aecordina to my understaiidinu of them, were intended to convey the ideii that 1 would not. whenever 1 iiiitjht tleeni it expedient, establish my press in this eity. On the contrary. 1 have uniformly said from tlieconiinence- ment, that soon as the jiaper. riHavthropist, had Mon for itself the characler lor fairness, moderation, and kind and sober discussion, that I detenuined it should deserve. I would remove the pre.ss to this, my place ot residence." •'.Viid so far, from giviiiLi a solemn j)lediie at a public meetiug in this place, that \ would tiot'do so. I endeavored at liie iiieetiiiii lefi-rred to, to e()rrect in the most expre>;s and une- qaivfM-al termx — so far as the noise and collf^l^i(ln which prevailed, enabled me to do so — an erroneous ini]>r<'ssion. which the >[ayor hail received from a jnevious conversation on the same subject. 1 then stated that 1 had never intended to make the impre.ssion that I would surrender any of my eonsfitutif»nal rijiht-s, leiteratinK in the last words of my remarks — "TUAT I .\Kvi:n wori.D." Kcntuckians were active in urging Cincinnatiaus to supjncss di.scussion. No H(joucr had the Philauthropid made its appearance, than a Kentucky editor, through his jonrnai, exclaimed : •• We have no doubt that his office will be torn down, but we trust that .Mr. iJirncy will receive no personal harm. Nntwith- Htanditig his mad notions, we consider him an honest and benevolent man. He in resolute tuo." The agitators determining that .something iiinst be done, that the citv tnight not lose the g<»od will of the South, convened a large meeting, at whicli a com- mittee was appointed to call upon .^lr. Hirney and insist that the jiajicr must be buppre.s.sed . 'J'his ciimmittee consistcil id' tlio.se wlm wcri- considered the first men in the city; among them, were Judge Hurnet. Judge IJurke and llev. Mr. Spenc^er. When the committee called, iMr. Hirney. inferring from their remarks, that they were indirterently infornu'il as to the objeijt of those they called abolitionist.s, proposed to di.scusw the subject with any of them in any public place they might select. It was at once rejilied that siuh a meeting could not be held in the <;ity, that the people would not bear public diacua- jjicc on slavery. :iiiii tli;it the spetiker would lose his life in attempting to die- A TKUUITK ru .lAMKS (J. lUKNKV. 7 engfl it. Mr. liinioy promptly assured tlieiii, that witli tlioir .sanction for the call of such a nieoting;, he was willing to hazard all ])ersoual peril to himself. The committe were asked if they had read the Philanthropist, and if they had, whether the objection to its eontimianco was made on the i^rouud of there being anything exceptionable in the manner and spirit, of conducting it. They replied, that the manner and spirit of the paper had nothing to do with the question, it was the discu.ssion of slavery here, that was thought to be injuring the business of the city, — that the paper was believed to be a prominent in- strument in carrying on this discussion, therefore its absolute discontinuance was called for, that the public sentiment would be satisfied with nothing short of this, and it was in such condition that it could not be rea.sonod with." To this demand of the (Jommittee, Mr. Birney on the next day, in behalf of himself and associates, submitted a reply in writing of which the follow- ing is a part. "Whilo we feel our.selves constraiiu-d altof^etlier to decline coinplyiuif with yuur request a.s .submitted last evening, to discontinue tlie Philanthropist, we think it but just to our- selves, and respectful to our fellow-citi/ens generally, to oflfer a l)rief ex|)ositi(in of the rea- son.s that })ersuade us to this course." 1. Wo decline ooniplyino-, not so much from the ii^wx that the particular cause in which oar press is eniployeil may be injured, but l)ecause compliance involves a tame surrender of the freedom of the Pi-ess — the risht to discuss. "I. '' The Philantrho})ist is the acknowledoed ornan of some twelve thousand or more of our fellow-citizens of Ohio, who believe that .slavery, as it exists in this country, is alto- gether incompatible with the permanency of her institutions ; who believe that the slavery of the South or the liberty of the Xoith nmst cease to exist ; and who intend to do what in tliem lies, lo briny about a hajipy and jieacefnl termination of the former, and this as speedily as facts, .-uul arguments and apjieals to the conscience and understandings of the Slaveholders can be made instrumental to etiect it.'" 3. " The Philanthropist is the only journal in this city or neighborhood through which these facts, and arguments and ajipeals can be fully addressed to the commimity. It has been conducted with fairness and moderation, as may be abundantly proved by the acknow- ledgments of those wlio are opj)osed to its o))jects. It has invited the slaveholders them- selves to the use of its colums for the defense of slavery, and has given uji to a republica- tion of their arguments a large share of its sj)ace. To discontinue such a paper under existing circumstance would be a tacit submission to the exorbitant demand of The|South that slavery shall never more be n)entioned among us." 4. "We declii\e complying with your request, becau.se we would not i)reclude ourselves and others from discussing, in the most advantageous manner, a subject, which by the acknowledgment of all. is of momentous consequence, and which is now- occupying the rnind of the whole nation." 5. "We decline complying, because the demand is virtually the demand of slaveholders, who having taken down all the safeguards of liberty in their own States, in order that slavery may be peri)etupted, are now for the fuller attainment of the same object, making the demand of us to follow their exanqjle." 6. '■ We decline coinplyin£r, because tlie Jittenqit i.s now tirst made in our case lonually and deliberately to }iut down tlie freed(mi of speech and of the Press, We are, to be sure, the objects of the attack, but there is not a fieeman in the State \vhose rishts are not invaded, in any assault which may be made upon us for I'efusing to succumli to an impe- riou.s demand to surrender our rights." " With these reasons, to which many nloie might be added, did time permit, we leave the case with you; expressins, however, our linn conviction, should{any disturbance of the peace occur, that you, gentlemen, must be dee])ly, if not aimosr entirely responsible for it before the bar of sober .and enlighened public opinion," Upon this answer, the Cincmiati IFJi/'r/ of the next day made the following comment : "Uponnhe answer of the abolitionists we have at i)ersent but few remarks to make, but we think its tone and character hiahly exce|)tionable. The language used in the sec- ond, fourth and sixth reasons assigned we consider exceedingly insolent, and offensive, and well calculated to augment rather than allay the excitement at present existing in Uiecity. The position a.ssumcd that the slavery of the South or the liberty of the _ North must cease to exist, we think pre-eminently insulting, and atrocious both in reference' to our Southern brethren and ourselves." 8 A TIUBITK TO .lA.MK.S (i. BIJtNKV. The cxciteuieut however increiuscd. llandltills were posted lor a hirge meeting of those disposed to suppress discussion. An extract from a letter of Mr. Birney, written at this time, shows how lie regarded these movements. '• Sir, 1 have enoiiKli to do here. Tlie war i.s rajjiiiji — the jiroslavery .spiiit feels a.s if it had been struck, and is trirding itself for the strife. An anti-aboliiion nieetins is to be held thiaeveiiiiis, i.alled by treiitleMioii of property and standintj. The hand of the South has almost lu'iiunibed the s])iril <>f freedom here; * * * * 1 Otaiuiot ])iiul iny i>aper here; 1 lectured here one eveniuij to a small audience, in a private manner, no notice of it havini; been tjiven in the i)npei-s. This is the excitiusi cause of the ineetintr this evenins. It was but yesterday that a wealthy slaveholder of Kentucky called to let me know tliat my paper in Ohio would be destroyed by a band of his fellow-citi/cns, who liJid determined upon it; that almost the wlude, country would bo summoned to the service, and that my life was in constant danser. A few days before, a citizen of Cincinnati, a high commissioned officer of the militia, called to inform me that 1 would be disc(racefully punished and abused, and mj' property destroyed, if I j)ersisled in uiy auti-slavery movements, * * 1 pray you press on. It is not a time to l)e indolent. If we are our children 7nay wear the livciy of the slave. If I fall in tliia cause, I trust it will bring hundreds to supply my jilace. In another letter referring to a lecture he delivered in the vicinity of the city, he says : • During the hour I spoke, the mob having crowded about the door, were engaged in discharging at me their lighted missiles; whiMi 1 had finished, and was returning to my loilgings, a mile distant, I was attended by them the greater ])art of the way, they breaking in on the stillness of the niglit with their fierce and demoniac shouts. But why. you may ask, do you dwell on such things, of laic by no means of unconimon occurrence ! I recall them that our friends, the friends of Freedom, to the slave, of freedom to the white man, of protecting law, of inalienable rights, of constitutional liberty, may be more and more animated to the conflict. Every day is disclosing to us more evi in such a c:u*e ? Ought we to yield to fear 7 * * * AVe have now in some degree, from the force of circuinstances, connnitted to our custody the rights of every freeman in Ohio, of their offspring, of our own. Shall ve as <-r;ivens vr)luntarily oiler them up sacrifices to the tjj)irit <>f misrule, or as .Amerii-an citizens, coniend for iheni, lill a foice which we cannot withstand, shall wvr>\ ilieni from our li:inds '. The latter part of the alternative we have endirneed with a fidl aireech and the liberty of the pre.<)8 — tin paUadium of our rights" No expedient was left unturned whieli might intimidate Mr. Birney and hia coiwljutors. The jiress was plied ; large meetings were held ; sj)eech(>s were made; resolutions were adopted; committees organized — everything was put in A THIISIlTi: I'll JAMKS i;. ItlK.NKV. 9 motion to reiluco or destroy tlic little baml of pliiliinthropists, who liiid plcdpoil their ull to the eiui.se in wlileli tliey luul enlisted. At len^tli the meeting: \v;is held. 'I'he ('incinnati lieptihlicav of dune, IHytj^ describes it, as follows : •'Our jiredictiuiis witli it-spt'ta u> tlui .seminifiils uf tliu oitizeus ofCiiKiiiuaii ujion tliis subject, were verified fully and uneiiuivocally at the meeting wliicli liMnspiiod at the Court Mouse in (liis city, on last Saturday. To our mind, the proeeodinys of ijiat. eveninij establi.^ii a.s eoiielusively. a.s the cxpro.ssion ot puldic .sentiment and jailiiic leclinfj; can establi.-li anytliiii:^. that \\w doctrine of abohtion and it.s advocates will nc'ver hv counte- tianced or encouraged in llinciimali. Tiiis hieeting was not conlined to ]ia,rty or .soct. It was leased n))on a call from tnen of all parties, classes, distinctions and callings. The most distinguished and influential men of the city were there and took an active jiart in the proceedings. There were Judges, Merchants, Lawyers, Divines, Physicians, and the mo.st respeetabk^ tradesmen and citizens of every class. There were Presbyterians, Bajitists, Methodists, and members of almost every religious denominations. There were Jackson and Harrison men, and mc'n of all jjolitical jiarties. all as.sembled for the .same purpose and iiiKMit on accomplishing the same object— ilie e\-))ression of theii- iibboience of tht>. diabolical doctrines of the abolitionists." The Conrt House was filled :uid a crowd gathered around it id' some four thousand. After the speakers had charged Mr. IJirney with every oftense that they supposed would increase the excitement, and wheij the crowd was wrought up to siich a pitch as to be retuly for any de\ilish deed, according to the account of the Cincinmifi Gazette. "A good looking man, past the meridian of life, with hair somewhat grey, here ro.se and .said : '' My name is Bik.nky. May I be be heard." The audience appeared confounded by such a recjuest coming from such :i .source. Eecovering from their surprise, at the calm fearless- ness of the mtiii who dared stand untirmed, save in the panopy of right, in the midst of his enemies. One cried " down with him," others cried " kill him,'' others cried. •' tar and feather him." For a time there was confusion worse confounded. Mr. Birney, with entire self possession, remarked that he would not proceed if he could not have the ear of the assembly. To go on under such circumstauce.s Avould justify the charge of obstinacy, that had been laid at the door of abolition ist.s. At this stage, Gen, Lyth;, who iiad great influence M'ith tlie mob, rose, and at the top of his voice, cried — '' Hear before you strike." The meeting then re.solved to liear. " Mr. Birney thanking ihem for the une.xpected favor, said thai his sentiments had been raisunderst,o(ul. It was no part of the design of the abolitionists to interfere witli the constitution of the country. They only asked to mak(^ their apjieals to their fellow citizens wlio hold slaves, and endeavor to j)crsuade them that it was wrong to treat in this way their fellow men. Kmanciii.ation was a v.ork that could be carried on and consunmiated without, touching the constitution of the country." " He was not inditfi?rent to the safety of his fellow citizens of the South. He was born in the South — he had spent his life there — he had a numerous beloved kindred who held slaves. To their safety he Avas not indifferent, and he certaiidy should jtursue no course, which he thought likely to put them in i>enl. He considered" that the ultimate safety of the Soutli was more in danger from per]iefual slaven.-, than from its abolition. See how" the blacks increase upon the whites. Tliis disjiroiiortionate inciease of l)lacks will finally bring the very caLastrojihe wliich is now dreaded. It may be slow, but it will come if slavery is perpetuated. He desired to save his fellow citizens of the South, and his countn' from "the horrors of that day.'' '• He had reason to believe, that such a])peals to his fellow citizens on this subject, would nor he in vain. Such appeals bad reached his own conscience and i)\fluenced his conduct." When Mr. Birney concluded he mingled among the crowd, and retired up- on adjournment without further molestation. ITis conduct Inul disarmed the madness of the multitude. The Cincinnati Whig describing the meeting says : 10 A TKIBITK Ttl .lAMKS (i. HIKNEY. '■ U was altogetlier Worthy III' Ciiu-iiinati and the Western em|ioinuiii. It was very large and eniini-ntly rt'>iM«ftal>lc. It was attended l>y many of our oldest, and most influ- eiiliaJ eiti/.ens. It was i-omposed of all |)arlies and sects, and the whole asseiuhly seemed to \h> ins|iinMl wiiji n lonnnoii sentiment of abhorente of altoliiionisni. The incidents of the meeting were jexceiMlln-ily interesting and somewhat ))eod deal of confu- sion ensuefl. Some were for turning bim out. some for conii)elIini; his silence, and others lor hearing what he had to .say. A vote was then taken whether he should be permitted to sj»eak. and was de<-idfsl in tin- alHrmatiw by a large majority." Ainonir the ii'solutinn.s passed at the iiieotiiii', were tlie foHowiiig : IUm'/'-'i/. That in the opinion of this meeting, nothing short of the abolute discontinu- ance of the ]iublication ol the said alxdiiion |)aj>er in the city, can prevent a resort to vio- lence which may be disjuslrous to its- publishers and supporters, as it must be to the good onler and fair fame of our city." Ktfoiiii/. That a conunittec. .oMsisting of twelve peisons. be appointed by the Chair to wait upon James (J. IJiniey, and his associates, in the |)ublication of the s^id paper, to remonstrate with them upon the dangerous icndency of the course they are pursuing, to commiuiicat** to them, the actual tone of public feeling in tJie city, to request them by every motive of i)at Holism and )>hilanthropy, to desist from the publication of their paper, and to warn them, that if they peisist. we i-annot hold ourselves responsible for the conse- cpiences.'" The Ciiuinmtl FArnin;/ Po»t jrave the fnllowing account of tlie result of this meeting, anil such resolves,; •Ab«mt dark on Saturday evening, a large number ol i>ersons, among them some of our most resiH^ctable inhabitants, convened at the K.Kchange and jiroceeded up Main to the corner of 7th street. increasiners ns ihey went, having arrived there, a U^w persons fiit^-red the printing oiH<-e of .Mr. I'age. where the J'/iilmithropist was ))ublished, and in a short time threw into the street or demolished everything alxuit the jMemises, amiil the cheers of tear or five thousand who were looking on. The printing jnes.ses were dragged down to the river, (a liist.ince of half a mile) jmt on board a skitl'and carried inlo'the'^iTiiddle of the Rtreain an/ u{ Aug. '1. gi\es this Btateiuent : "On Sunday niRhl last a great mmiber of iiei-sons were congregated in front of the Franklin Hou.s<'. .in in the house. reiKuted that he Mas not there." It so h'lppened that on th<5 night of the mob Mr. Birnoy was in ilillsburough, Ohio, .some si.vty miles from Cinciiinaii, fnlfining jiti appointment to lecture, and in this way providentially escnpe.l the \ ioleii.e of tht; und). and prf>hablv death at their bands. The follow ing exiracts from letters of Mr. Birney, wiilten at tliat time, show tlio spirit with which l.e received this ti>-atmetit: " The eiiendes of law" said Mr. B. •• will adopt a new com-se— tliev will iiereal'ter '.jH-niU- priyal<-ly-;;lheir aim will be ugainsi the persons of .KJH.liiiouist.s. This is now the (iiiirN-. We fear it not Threats of persomd \iolence. to oni-self esi)ccially. of seizure and deporiuiion. are n^ ( onimon ;ls the air we breathe ; nor have diey been withheld, which conlemphiU-d a still m<»re di.s;.'racelul. if not more fatal violence. • "* • « j{„t j.j^y jj^s U-en pn»strnted: \iolenc«- exults over its dowulnll ; the Constitution lies in dishonorable dust whilst bloorly treason Moiirishes over it. .Men are strin-k diind). ami spe resttired li, Uieir loKi thrones, and sway their ndhi -eepter w ithout n rival? No, this nnist be done by UioM- Hho would rather iLeniwIve- die n.e,,,.,, ihan live slaves, or our cnnntrv, liiorious as noK liMMi her ho|x'. is jfone forovor A ritlHUTK TO .rAMKS i;. HIKNKV. 11 "AKuin, ^riovou^ tlireal.s hiui- bcoii made for soint' tiiiR'. clii*'tly iir me, as the part I am to act in the trreat revolution whieh he has set on loot for the liljoration of the oppressed of our land.'" In an article reviowinc" the course of liis opponents, Mr. l^irney used the following language: "In tlie foregoing pages we iiave endeavorest precious rights were threatened by a lawless and fierce aris- tocracy." " Notwithstanding the unusual outburst of lawless aristocratic violence to which our peaceful, yet decided support of the freedom of the Press, of liberty of ■ipeech, of the right to discuss, has exposed tis, we have lost no confidence in the rectitude of our princi- ples, nor in the judgment which you and those which may succeed us. will pa.'^s on our con- duct; unconvinced ))y the force with which our arguments have lieen replied to. we shall still continue fearlessly to maintain and ])ublicly to inculcate the great principles of liberty incorporated in the constitutions of our State and General Governments: l>elieving that if ever there was a time, it is now come, when our rei)ublic, and with her the cause of univer- sal freedom is in a strait, where everything that ought to be prided by the patriot should be freely hazarded for her relief.'" The reader is asked to pause here, and con.sider whether in the declarations and writings of Mr. Birney, during this trying ordeal, he discovers anything that partakes of fanaticism. Does he take any position that any lover of this country cannot approve ? CORRESPONDENCE AVITH CALHOL'N AND ELMORE. On the IGth of February, 188H» the Hon. F. H. Elmore, of South Carolina, addressed a letter to Mr. Birney, of which the following is an extract: To Jas. G. Birney, Esq. Sir: — "A letter from you to John C. Calhoun, datfjd 2!)th January, say (in reference to the Abolitionists or Anti-Slavery Societies) -we have nothing to conceal, and should you desire any information as to our proceedings, it will be cheerfully communicated on being apprised of your wishes.' The frankness of this unsolicited ofler, indicates a fairness and honesty of i3ur])0se, which has caused the present communication, and which demands the same full and frank disclosure of the views with which the subjoined ini|uiries are Ivropose( iiilclli<;oiuf. ^inccrily and triithj wIki. although laboring iu a bail catiK-. ith ability, aixt tVoin a inislaki-ii coiivictiou of its justice. As one of the f-i'^-'i-ntativcs of a ^lavi>-h; (iiiistituriRy. ami oiu- of a committee raised by the Ilej :vf.s of the ^Iave-h(»ldiiif( .>^tates. to a.-^eertain the intentions and ])rogress of your aie«' -. I uvuilccl niy.self of the opitorlunity offered by your eharaetei- and situation, to pni|>os<' to you imiuiries a.>» to facts which would make those dcvi'Idpinent.s. so imi)ortant to U" known by our |M>ople. My inr|uiries were framed to draw out full and autheutic details of the orpanizaiioii, ruimberfi. re. for the accy thi-< ill-(i>nsidi'red. njisnamed an: exi«t together upon terms of eipiality. the extirpation of one, and the ruin of iho other would Ix' inevitable. This humanity, concei\ed in wrong, and born iu civil strife, would be baptized iu a people's blood. It wits that -et, the full oxt4"nt of this gigantic conspiracy and crusade against their institutions. :uiil of necessity upon tlieir li\fs with which they must sustain them, and their fortuiu's aud prosperity, which exist only while the.«t' iiislitnlions exist, that I was induced to enter into a correspoiulenee with you. who by \o\iv official station and intelligence were known ioinLs and from your well established character for candor and fairness, would make no stateinen; of facts, which Merit not known or believed by you to \h- true. To a great extent my end has lieeii accomplished by joxu- replies to my enquiries. We difl'er no wider than 1 exi)ected, but that diflf'crence has been exhibited eourtoously.'* This enquiry for information evidently came frona those who were then laying jilans deep and \vii iu injustice, is l»ut to rush on its own ruin; that to do justice i« tJie highest exjiedieiKy; to love mercy. it.« noblest ornament. In other countries slavery ha»< w>raetimes yielded to fortuitous circumstances, or been extinguished by jihysical force. We strive to win for truth llu- victoiy over error, and on the Itrokeu fragments of slavery to rear for her a temjile that -^hall reach to the heavens, and toward which all nations shall worship. " .M.\N1 MI.S.-^10.\ OF SLAVES. In the year IH39, Mr. Jiirney's father deceased. He left a large estate, unincumberctl, consisting of land, money and .slaves. Mrs. John J. Marshall and him.self were the only heirs. He was summoned to Kentucky, to be j)resent at the division of the estate of his father. He at once requested that all of the negroes might be computed at their market valuation, as a part of his share. This was as.seiited to. He immediately wrote tho following deed : "Know nil men by these jiresent.s that I. .lames {',. Itiiney, l.ile of Kentucky, but now having my resideiire in Ihi- city of \ew York, Iwlieviug tli:il slaveholding is inconsistent with natunil justice, with the piecej.ts aiirl sjiirit of«tlie (Christian religioii. and with the dtHlarution of American Independence, aud wishing to U-stily in favor of Ihem all, do hen-by emMUcipHti". and forever set free, the following named slaves which have come into my iKMWJiwioti. it-* one of llie heirs of my father, James G. IJirney. pt«unlM'r, in the year of mir iiord. one tlmnsand eight hnndredaiid thirty "'"•••'^' JAMKS C. imiSEY. [sE.u-1 Several of iho men were experience*! rope makers, and would have readily commnndod tho very highest price of the market. A TKimiTK TO .lA.MKS (i. HIRNKV. IJJ V Mr. Birney discoverin£; that Eastern Anti Slavery papers were disposed to speak highly of this net of einauoiputioii, wrote to the editor of tin: Ktnnncipator, and made it a special request, that he would givo him no comniuudation, for the reason that he had done only an act of justice, for which ho deserved no praise. Upon the importunity of Judge Marshall, he loaned him the money which was his share of the estate. Judge Marshall becoming bankrupt, never repaid any of the money, not even the interest, whi(;h he was earnestly entreated to pay, to aid in the education of his children. The result was that Mr. Birney realized nothing whatever from the estate, except the privilege of inditing the deed above described. HIS VISIT TO ENGLAND. ' In the year 1840 Mr. Birney visited England, and was received with the utmost cordiality, by the friends of freedom. Ho was one of the Vice-Presidents of the World's Convention. He spent several months in delivering addresses at different places. The estimation in which he was held in that country may be inferred from the following testimony of the committee of the British and Foreign Anti-Slavery Society : " That this Commitle are doejjly sensible ol' the services rendered to tlie anti-slavery cause, by their esteemed friend and foadjutor. James Gillesjiie Birnc}-, Esq., whilst in this country, iu a course of laborious elforts, in which his accurate and extensive infoimation, his wise and judicious counsels, and his jiower of calm and <'onvincing statement have become eminently consiiicuotis." During the same year President Kellogg, of Illinois, visited England, and thus described the impression which was left there by Mr. Birney's visit: "It was truly refreshing to me Mhile in (J real Britiain, amid the many complaints against my countrymen to which I was obliged to listen, to hear our excellent friend; James G. Birney so fn'qiiently spoken of, and always in terms of uiuiualilied ajiprobation and respect. The mention of his name in those circles in which he was known, and they were both numerous and extensive, invariably imparted pleasure, and many were the enquiries which were made in respect to his welfare. I could not but observe, that intelligent men, both in England and Scotland, ^ery highly ajipreciatcd him, for that trait in his character, which I have always, from my first ac([uaintanco w'nh Mr. IMrney, regarded as exhibited by him in a remarkable degree. Yoti will doubtless nnilerstand me as referring to his candor. In his public addresses and discussions, which were numerous in that country, as well as his private conversations, by the sobrietj^ of his own views, by the fairness and fullness with which he stated the positions and arguments of his opponents, and by the manliness with which he met and refuted them; he ever impressed his auditors ^\ith a conviction of the soundness of his sentiments, and of the perfect reliance which might lie placed upon his statements. The visits of such men to foreign lands are an honor to our country, and leave behind them a savor which is grateful to an American citizen." NOMINATED FOR THE PRESIDENCY IN 1840. In the month of May, 1840, he was nominated for the Presidency. In his letter of acceptance he made use of the following language: " The conclusion of the whole matter is, that as a jieoplc, we are trying an experiment, as nnphilosophical iu theory, as it has been, and ever M'ill be, found impossible in practice, to make a harmonious whole, out of parts that are in jirinciple and essence discordant. It is in vain to think of a sincere union l)etween the North and the South, if the first remain tnie to her republican ])rinciples and habits, and the latter persist in her slaveholding despotism. They are incapalde from their natures, of being made one. They can no more be welded together info one body of uniform strength and consistency, than clay and sand. They may. it is true, be ])resscd together, and made to cohere by extraneous appliances; and the line of contact may ))e daubed over and varnished, and conceah'd, but the first shock will make them fall assunder, and disclose the fact, that there never was any real incorpora- tion of substance." '' A large oligarchy, as the South is. made uj) of a multitude of petty desj)otisms, acting on the principle that men are not created equal — that a favored few are born ready booted and spurred, to lea]) into tlu! saddles m ith which the backs of the many are furnished by nature. Such a government I .say, when broutihi by circumstances into close juxtaposition and in ees.sant intercourse with reptiblics. acting on principle? diametrically opposite, must 14 A TlCim IK TU JA.MK.< (i. HIKNKV. soon Ik' l.roiii.'lii u» iiiiKlify. ami ••\«'uluull> t<> i-L-liiuiuish its piinciplcs and practices, or inec (Yr*!, Ui»' ivpiiMios miiM iiiulfr;ii> u similar cii!iii«iiMu~. (iju- nr ihf olbcr must in tlit- end ;riiin tin' ontire apcondency. An r:\v\\ iiii!iriiiii<.i) iif irn|iii-isil>lf toiiflict." KKNO.MINATKI* IN 184.".. Ill 1n43 h lnrf;e convention of niorabers of the Liberty Party, was hojd at Kuffalo. Mr. Birncv wns nt;ain nominated as a candidate for tlio Presidency. The writer was at the time in a situation to know that these nominations were to Mr. Biruev. as a personal matter, altoircther unacceptable; that his feelinect no advantage to himself. His sensitive mind certainlv could not have been pleased with the prospect of the abuse, detraction, and slander that were inevitably to be heaped upon, and thrown against him. He passed through an ordeal that few men have to try; and that undoubtedly shortened his life by several years. During the summer of 1844, a large meeting was held in Pittsburgh, to consider the subject of annexation. A committee was .nppointed to correspond with all those citizens whose names were before the public as candidates for the Presidencv, and ask of them an explicit declaration of their views, on the subject of annexation. President Green thus speaks of Mr. Birney's reply: "TIk" icplv tit Mr. Hirney is fiiiineiitly (hanictcristic. It is directly iind wlndiy to the |iur|)ow'. Tin- convictions of llic writer arc desi,iil)C(l definitely and cioaiiy; — without ttmlii(:iiiiy and disjnii^if Tin- arjruin<'nt is as Iwantiliil as it is coniiiact and concise. The whole ]>a)M'r is u just and striking s|ic(im<'n of frtnwine statcsniansliip: — sudi as is alooe adiipled to tli.' <'\i;.'ciuic8 in wliidi our country is iltrown." The following is an extract from that letter: "I am ii'ii avfi-sf to a iil>eral consiniction of the pow«TS of tin; government, whenever tlic ohjects oinijrlit are jilainly allowed in llie constiiulion. But when they are unknown to the constitution, the liheral eonstniclion wliicli lieconies neecssary to authorize tlicm. is but another iiaiiii' tor usurpation." •'It oujrht iii'ver to Im- lost sijiht ot. that in this country the so\ in name abides with the peojde; that tlie jiowers of tiie government are but emana- fi(»n» or portioiih of that .sovei-ei;;nty inijiarted to such of the citizens as may be duly called lo iKlmiiii^tralive functions; and that tli<'s«> ])owei-s, wliilst they are to 1m' exercised .solely for (he fjenend wt-lfare. must not l)e exercised at nindnni. Init within the limits marked out by the |H*o|ile them-^dves. in the constiiulion. Should exfierience jirovo that these limits an; i called a lilieral coiislructioii of their (lowerH: tail f'W ha\e Millered loss In a ri^jid one. The liberal construction of to-day is iioi unfreipieiilly made the ground-work of n more liberal, if iir)i a licentious one lo-iiiorniw" '• My answer lo your third ami last impiirs, • irmUd i/uii (>!• trilliin/ ti> receive it as slave .V(Ti7»/i7/.*' may Im* luiticiputed fjeneially from w hat 1 have said in answj^r to your second I'luiiy. Hut I Ininl yon will n-ceive iiidul;;entl\ a brief explication of mv views on tie -.o.'cet." A TltnUTK TO JAMKS (i. ItlltNKV. 15 "I allow not to liiumiii hiws, he they i)riiiiarv or .-iccoinLiry. no iiialtcr liy wliiit iiuinlxTor with what ^^oloiiinilios ordained, tiie least senihlunte of risrht to estal)li>h sla\erv. to mak(i properly of my fellow man. created ((inally with myself in the ima<;'e of (iod. Individually, or as political conimmdlies. men Iiunc no more rigid lo enact ^iiavery than they have to enact murder or ))las)ihemy. To establish Slavery is to dethrone ritjiit. (o trample on jusliee, the only true foundations ol ;j;(jveriiin('nt. (lovernments exist not for the destruction of lilierty, but for its defence. — not for (he annihilalion of men's I'ifihts, but for their jjruser- vatioii. Do they incorportite in their ort>anic law the elemi-nt of iiijuslice'.' Do they live i)V admittinj;' it in practicir.' Then do they destroy their own iitundalioii. and absolve all men from the duty of alle,!iiance"" '•We lia\e no right to ri»tti,uie chains which we ha\(' no right to forge or lo impose."' After a review of the fncts pertaining to the purchase of Louisinnn, and the compromise upon the iidniissioii of Missouri, he concludes as follows: "Such is (he condition of o\ir affairs now — one fIlr^\■hich we have been prepared, mainly by the two annexations that havi- already taken place, and by the adnussion of Missouri into the Union. It is a sad condiliou, Imt not devoid of hoiie. For again are the friends of the Constitution and of universal liberty rallying, and fast swelling the ranks of a i)arty in whose success lies, as 1 (irmly believe, (he oidy reasonable hope for the rescue of the Republic from its most dangerous and most insidious foe. Already is it evident that the constancy ane u gri<'vons event, to be addcul to the already unhappy catalogue of events of kindred character, that have been used lo establish injustice in the land, and to ])erpetuate the evils of (he mos( abominable tyranny that man iuu>< I'ver usurped over his fellow man." NO rXFJMENDLY FEELING TOWARD MR. Cl.AV. The excitement during the canvass of 1844, ran very high. Mr. Clay, the candidate of the Whigs, had many ardent and enthusiastic admirers, who were readv to do everything within their power for his election. They seemed to think that all that was good in principle was upon their side; and that opposition must arise from some personal hostility. The chief whig papers declared that Mr. Birney persisted in being a candidate, because of some personal hostility enter- tained toward Mr. Clay. In reply to this, Mr. Birnoy wrote a letter, of which the following is au extract: IIamdkx, Ct.. October lu, 1844 To Editor of X. V. Tribune: '• The charge of inveterate hostility to Mr. t'lay, if it means anydiing more than politi- cal opposition, is wholly imaginary. I have no reasons for opposing Mr. Clay on personal grounds. On (he contrary, the intercourse we have had has been of the most friendly character." '■ I oppose hise|{H;tion because he dist)elie\es th(' great political truths t>f the Declaration of Independence — the foundation of all just governments; and because he repudiates the paramount object of the union — the perpetuation of liberty to all. On the same ground I opposi' the election of Mr. Polk." TIIF GARLAND LETXflR. In October, 1844, a letter, known as the Garland letter, and purporting to bo writtec bv James G. Birney, was pnblished, and circulate. 1S||. speaking of this treatment Kiid: '•Thin uiiyehlli'iiianlikonini itMl<'n>iis Irealment o( a m'litleiiiiiii <>t Mr. iJiriiey's knowi; ••haraet<'r ami ^lall ever imlliale .such a lireadi of propriety, ili.s lanmiajie was mild; his manner J 1 ihiil eulinness and niy jirevailed is admitted, I believe by fill, of every i)arty, but certainly by a decisive majority, even of tlu^ Whiles ])re.senf. Mr. Birney has devot<>d a large part of an active life, spent amid slavery in exclusive devotion to this subject. He has brounht to it intellect anil talents of a hi}jh order — a thoujThtful and reflective mind, has discsled the events of time; memory and order have laid them by ready for u.se at a moment's call. [t does Mr. Piatt no discredit to say liial on th(! subject of slavery he was unabh^ to nuHst James (}. Birney." " Afr. IJiriu\v's eObrt was one of thi> h!i])piest nature, ])robably one of the l)est he ever made — the most powerful and convincing certainly that the v,riter ever lieard from him. His laiiouage was mild, clear and of the most classical jnuity. His action was in strict keeping with his subjects. His reasoning was intelligible and convincing. At times he rose to the highest pitches of the most pure eloquence, thrilling every hearer no less with the nobleness of his subject than the appropriate beauty of his language. He rose willi his thenu\ and as he descanted upon tiie liudalo iesolutit)ns resp(>cting the constituri(!nal jjro- vision for surrendering fugitive slaves, as he dwelt upon the onmi])otence of God's law, of the awful daring of m(>n who legislate against, it. as lie portrayed the ini<[uity of slavery, the stripes and lashes of the task-master, the escape of the slave at last, the ptirsuit, the recapture, the mocking claim that the fugitive owes service, he carried with him his whole audience, and a burst of universal ajjplau.se proclaimed that party feeling for once fled before the more generous sym])athies of the American." " When Mr. Birney closed, a voice in the crowd called for ' three cheers for Birney,' it wa.sjjeartily responded to, and though so many hundreds of political op[)onents were present not a sound of di.sapi)robation mingled with this tribute of respect." i Nevertheless, there was a result that frequently attends success. His op- ponents embraced every opportunity to cover him with abuse. They wished to neutralize any favor which the matter and manner of his speech had gaiiied for him. The Detroit Advertiser, then eminently a Clay paper, of the 11th of Jul}', 1844, contained a long article, signed a " Whig," containing a cari- cature of his remarks, and accusing him of " base and deliberate calumny," of " adding cowardice to falsehood," of " shameless and venomous falsehood," of using " low scandals," and " glaring perversions of truth," '' and his whole speech was a tissue of rancerous personal abuse, sly, unmanly inuendo, and harsh and brutal calumny." This letter in the Advertiser was accompanied with an intimation that Mr. Birney or his friends, if agrieved by such a publication, might make correc- tions and (Explanations through the same paper that had published the anony- mous libel. To which Mr. Birney returned the following reply: To the Editors of the Iktroit Advertiser : " Gentelemen : — Duly acknowledging the ofTer which you have authorized to be made to nie, to o])en yriur columns for any answer that I might choose to make to an article signed "A Whig," wliich appeared in the Advertiser, of this morning, I have only to say, that e'very consideration of the respect that is due both to myself and to the public, forbid my takino- any further notice of the article in question, abounding as it does, in false and reckless assei-^ tions, and violating in the language in which the assertions are made, the acknowledo-ed courtesy of uewspaper discussion. Yours, &c., JAMES G. BIRNEY." Detroit, July 11th, 1844. The editor of the Si(/ml of Liberty, of July 22d, 1844, speaking of this debate, said : " We were in Detroit a day or two after, and were gi-atified to find that men of all par- ties and conditions, Judges and Statesmen, down to the class that hold political discussions in the grocery, were unanimous in the opinion that Mr. Birney's vindication of the principles and policy of the Liberty party, against the charges so ably preferred by Mr. Platl vas full, satisfactory, complete and triumphant." ' IK A TKIIIl'TK TO .lAMKS (i. BIRNKY. THK DKFKAT OF II EN 11 Y CLAY. At the elcctiuii of 1844. James G. Birnoy received 62,300 votes. Henry Clay received 1.2!t!»,0(»iJ. .Jaiue.s K. Pnll<, IM'.n.'lVo. Polk's majority over Clav was 38,181. Biniev's vote added to Clay would have given a majority of Si, 11 9. If 0,107 coidd liave Ikhmi taken away from the Liberty party and added to those cast by the Whig party in New York, Mr. (May would have received the electoral vote of that State, and that taken from I\Ir. Polk and given to him, would undou])te(lly have elected him President. The friend.s of Mr. C^lay up- on making thit< di.scovery, gave vent to the most intense disappointment, and put no restraint upon the abuse they heaped upon those who were so obstinate as to east their votes foV a maji whom tliey had not the slightest hope of elect- ing. They could n>it then see the least benefit to arise from voting for a priu ciplc. They seemed to think that the Whig party was a matter of course tnititled to the anti-slavery vote. But that was not the only State in which the same result had happened. In Michigan Mr. Polk received 27.759 votes, yiv. Clav "Jt.'I.'H. Mr. Binu'y 8,()o2. So that it is perfectly clear in this case alsi). that if the i^iberty party ^-ote " had not been thrown away on Birney," Mr. Clay would have received the electoral vote of Michigan. Yet a similar fact occurred in the State of Ohio, in regard to the Demo- cratic party. In that State Mr. Clay received 155,057 votes, Mr. Polk 149,- 117, Mr. liirney S,(>5(i. It is apparent that if the Birney vote had been added to that of Polk, Mr. Clay would not have secured the electorial vote of Ohio., And it might have been that the vote of that State would have deci- ded who should have been President. In that case the Democratic party could have used the same cause of complaint. THK COURSE OF THE N. V. TIUIJUNE. At that time the Xetr Yuri' Tribune was the leading journal of the Whig party. Its editor idolized Mr. (May. lie appeared to think that it was only necessary to make Mr. Clay President, to inaugurate the golden age in which all evil would be surmounted, and every good promoted. His acbniration was HO complftt' that he doubtless thought so then. His ])aper was for a long time filled with the most unmitigated abuse of Mr. Birney, for allowing him- self to be voted for, by so numy misguided men. Sometime within the follow- ing two years, :i man by the name of .lames (i. Barney died at the place of .Mr. Birney 's residence. A vessel arriving at Chicago froni Lower Saginaw, reported that James (i. Birney had died. The telegraph conveyed the intel- ligence to New York. The Tribntw jmblished an obituary, regardless of the ancient adage, nil niorfum utti honum, but made it the oec:usion of a malignant attack, assailing his motives, and bewailing lh(> great error of his life, in not electing Henry Clay. Mr. Birney was at the time at the residence of a son in Cincinnati. He replied in a mild letter to the Tribune, stating that he had the satisfaction of reading his own obituary and corrected sonic i)alpablo errors into which the editor liad fallen. Mr. Clay died in 1H52. Mr. (rrccly wrote his biography in which he re- peats the charge above referred to, in the fcdlowing pa.ssage : ■ Mr. I'lilk carricii most «>l iho Soutlieni Stales on the lussuniption tliat the acquisition of T<*xa.n would Klrciicllipii th«i jMiwor of ulavcry, und improve the market for slaves, while Now York nnd oUn'r SUilfs. Iioctilc to thai policy, wen* lost to Mr. Clay l)y tlio anti-Texas \tiUm (hrowii awnv on Jaiii<« O. Hirncv. Mr. Polk rcrcivcd 170 electoral voles, Mr. Clav A TIUmiTK TO JAMKS (;. lilllNKV. 19 105. New York aloiio would have cliaii;4(>(l llic i(>sult, and lit-r electors were secured to Polk by a pleuralitj' of 5,10(1, while more tliaii 15,000 votcH were squandered un llie Birney Abolition ticket." Yet ill the same biography ho makes the following admission : • Durini2 the winter and spring of 1848, Mr. Clay's name was again presented in con- nection Willi the Whig nomination for the Presidency, and was very warmly iiailed by the great mass of the ])eople, but the leading jioliticians, beli(n'ing that the i)rejudice against him in the minds of the majority of tlie voters, however unjust, was rooted and invincible, were generally in favor of nominating Gen. Taylor." "Gen. Taylor rcceiveil 111 votes in convention. Mr. Clay 07, and some 80 were scattered upon other persons." This idea, as propagated by ^Ir. Greeley, grew and gained strength, so much so, that ill almost everything written on the same point by members of the same party up to 18G0, the idea is repeated. The American Encyclopedia ^ published by Appleton, of N. Y., in 185S, con- tains what purports to be a sketch of the life of James CI. Birney. The fol- lowing remarkable passage occurs in it : "His pur))ose was to build nj) a ])olitical ])arty upon the single question of slaveiy, to act upon the government within the forms of the Constitution ; and he succeded in forming an organization in most of the Northern States, under the name of the Liberty Party. During his absence in England, he was nominated in 1 840 by that party for the Presidency, but met with little success. He was again nominated in 1844, when he received more votes. It was charged upon his friends, at the time, that by withdrawing their votes from Mr. Clay, especially in the State of New York, they accomplished the election of Mr. Polk, thus aim- ing the death blow at their own projects."' The author of that article was indeed correct in saying that such a charge had been made. But history, that is now rapidly righting what has been wrong, must find the fo],lowiug facts ; The Liberty party, as early as 18o9, had an- nounced their declaration of sentiments. To vote for a slaveholder for any office was entirely inconsistaut with these sentiments, as much so as the holding of slaves would have been. It was organized to oppose slaveiy. How then could it support a slaveholder for the highest office in the land — as well ask a christian church to make a bishop of the devil. The national convention of the Liberty part}^ held in 1843, at Buffalo, adopted a series of resolutions as their platform, of which tlie following was one; " That we regard voting, in an eminent degree, as a moral and religious duty, which, when exercised, should be by voting for those who will do all in their ])ower for immediate emancipation." Could it be said that a Kentucky slaveholder, who Avas receiving the un- paid toil of slaves, was one who was doing all he could for immediate emancipa- tion '? xVbsurd ! The Liberty party had better at once have disbanded than have voted for any such man. And the more influential such a man, the greater the probability of his counteracting the sentiments of this newly organized party. To vote for him would have been untieing the cord that bound such a party together. The leaders of the Whig party understood this matter thoroughly. They neither expected, nor had they right to expect, that tlie Liberty party would vote for a slaveholder. In view of this fact, they selected Mr. Clay as their standard bearer. They conjectured that his popularity, was so groat that he could be elected without so contemptible a fragment as the Liberty party. Did Mr. Birney's friends withdraw their votes from I\Ir. Clay 'i What are the facts':' In 1843. on a vote for State officers in New York, the Liberty party cast 16,275 votes. These votes, therefore, may be considered as committed to the Liberty party irrespective of the claims of Mr. Clay. If in the next year at •JO A TniBUTK Tl» JA.MKS C. Hlli.NKV. the Pre8i(l«n»tial vote, the number had greatly increased, it might possibly be inf\rn'(l thrit some votes were vitlidrawii iVoiu Mr. (May, although Democrats, n.s well as Whigs joiued the Liberty party, liut in 1S44, instead of being increased, tlie Liberty party was according to one account only 15,119, and according to anothrr lV),sl'i. In view of this fact, it might, with much more propriety, be said, that 3Ir. ('lay\s friends withdrew from 3Ir. Birncy. This whole charge- has no other dignity than that of a mere complaint of dis.ippointed jjoliticians. History will reject it as false, in fact, — unphilosophi- cal in theory, and as no foundation for a complaint. Every intelligent mind readily attributes Mr. Clay's defeat to another cause. The country was then agitated by the question of the extension of the area of slavery. The Northern mind was opposed to extension. The leg- islatures of the free States, almost without exception, whether Whig or Demo- cratic, solemnly protested against the admission of Texas witli slavery. The lower branch of the legislature of New York, adopted the following resolution : '• Reitolved, That thi.s leji.'ilature do, in the name of the i)eoi)Ie in the State of New York, solemnly protest against tlio admi.-ision of the Republic of Tcxa.s into this Union." The legislature of Michigan, " Rrsolved, That in behalf and in the name of the State of Michigan, this legislature doth hereby dissent from, and solemnly protest against the annexation for any purpose to this Union, of Texas. , These are but samples of the resolutions passed by several States. In view of this Northern sentiment, Mr. Clay, when making a tour through the South, in the earlier part of the canvass of 1844, wrote a letter dated at Raleigh, and sent it North for publication, in which he gave the impression that he was oppo.sed to the annexation of Texas. It was not long before the South- ern papers commenced assailing him as one opposed to their policy. His Northern friends, doubtless Mr. Greeley among the number, became alarmed by the apprehensions that Mr. Clay was losing Southern support. To counteract this reaction of the slavery sentiment, Mr. Clay prepared and published a let- ter in the North Alabaraian, of which the following is the portion relating to this (jucstion : AsHLAKD, July 27, 1844. MessfH. I'ETEKS & JACKSON. * * * " I?iit gentlemen you are desirous of knowing by what policy I would be guided in niy election as Chief Magistrate of the United States, in reference to the ([uestion of the anne.Katioii t)f Texas. I do not think it right to announce in advance, the course of a future administration, in reference to a (juestion of foreign jyower." " I have, liowever, no hesitation in sayiiig, that far from having any personal objection to the annexation of Te.xa.s. I should be ghul to see it, without dishonor, without war, with the common consent of the Union, and u])on Just and tair terms," '• I do not think thai the subject of slavery ought to ad'ect the question, one way or the other. It is de.stined to become e.xtinrt at some distant day in my oi>inion, by the opera- tion of the inevitable laws of populatifni." " It would be unwise to refu.se a pennanenl acipiisition which will exist a.s long as the globe remains, on account of a temjKirary instilulion." '■ In the contingency of my electinn, to which you have adverted, if the affair of acquir- ing Texas, should l)econie !i subject of considt-riition I should be governed by the state of fact, and the state of ])ublic o|>inion existing at the time, I might be called upon to act. .Above all I shoidd be governed l>y the ))araniount duty of prcs«i-ving the Union entire and in liannoiiy, regarding it as 1 do, the great guaranty of every political ami public blessing under Providence, which a.s a people we are ])ermitteeh in 1838, that the sentiment of hostility to slavery extension had taken a deep hold on the religious sen- timent and conscience of the country, and that he fully shared in that .sentiment. You know how vehemently he and you fought the tight of '44, against tho. annexation of Texas, expressly because of your rejiugnance to slavery extension^ tnid how you hoih execrated Mr. ■ Clai/'n Alabama leiier as harlinj luijastifiahly weakined, if )iot tamed, onr hiiih moral panition on that ml'jeet. Who can forget the thunder of black Dan's brow at the Whig mass meetings throughout that memorable contest, as he made resistance to slavery extension the key note of that struggle. Were you and he then contending that ■ the Constitution was made, not for the white man but for negroes ?'" Was it in behalf of the negroes and against whites that you made that glorious though unfortunate struggle — itvfortiinalc as you and 1 thought, main- ly because Mr. Clay interposed to deranye var order of battle, and prevent our fiyhtimj it mi the unti-slavery yrouiul we had chosen. It plainly appears from this, that although Mr. Greely execrated Mr. Clay's letter, as having unjustifiably weakened -his high moral position on the sub- ject of slavery, yet he considered himself justified in heaping abuse upon the man who permitted himself to be voted for by those men, who if they did not execrate the letter could not persuade themselves to give the author of it their political support. If his position was weakened by such a letter, what would have been the efi:ect upon the position of the Liberty Party, if after all they had declared 22 A TUIBtTK TO JAMES 0. BIKNEV. and uffirmed before the world tlu'y had forsaken Mr. IJirnoy, whose letter above (juoti'd ^h(tw(.'d uutjualitii'd objfftion to the admission of Texas as a slave State, and have given their votes to the author of this letter, who thought that slavery ought not to eftett the subject one way or another V It would undoubtedly have been utterly j.rostrated and dissolved , Mr. (ireely designed to take a high moral position oii the subject of slavery. Had not ^Ir. Birney a right not only to take, but to hold a high moral position on the samo subject ? If the Liberty party had then surrendered, at what time would the Repub- lican party have triumphed upon the (question of oppositi(jn to slavery extension? But -Mr. (Ireeley as he grows older, also grows more positive on the question of the cause of Mr. Clay's defeat. In the Tribune of Jan. 7, 18G4, he replies to an article of the Rovhcster Baih) UnioiK in which it is asserted that " Mr. Seward and Thurlow Weed plotted for Mr. Clay's defeat," and that this was known to Mr. (Ireeley. lie denies the charge, and says that although Messrs. Seward and Weed are not his friends, " yet that truth is truth," and he must utter it — that it " has long been his decided conviction that hut for Mr. Chifs oicn unfortumte and nadli/ preverted letters to Alabama, tvith regard to the annexation of Texas, his election could not have been p-evertedy Great men are often convicted of inconsistency, especially in the heat of party contest, but do the annals of American politics furnish an instance of more complete retraction, or change of base, than this admission of Mr. (ireeley ? He avers positively that Mr. Clay's defeat was owing to his own unfortunate — execrable letter — that his election could not been preverted if ho had not writ- ten it, — yet in the biography of Mr. Clay, he asserts that New York was lost to Mr. Clay because Ifi.OOO anti-Texas votes were thrown away on James Gr. Birney. Can Mr. (Jreeley be so simple minded as to suppose that those ] 5,000 votes would have been cast for Mr. Clay, even if he had not written a letter that his warmest friends could not help execrating ':* Those 15,000 voters ad- hered to Mr. Birney amid the vilest abuse that Wiis ever heaped upon any man placed before the public as a candidate for office. Within the last few months Mr. Cireeley wrote an article for the iY. Y. Inde- pendent, in which he gave his opinion of the durability of the reputation of cer- tain mordern orators. He takes pains to say as to Mr. Clay, that although his oratory was popular at the time of delivery, yet that he failed to ally himself with any great moral (jucstion that would render his fann; lasting. Perhaps Mr. Greely, in his forthcoming work, giving a history of the strug- gle for freedom in America, may advance so far iis to admit that Mr. Clay. never «'vineed statesmanship in his treatment of the subject of slavery. Cer- tainly it is true, and can be demonstrated that for twenty-four years he made no progress iu graj)pling the problem. Mr i5enton. in his work " Thirty years in the U. S. Senate," shows conclu- Bively, that the Missoiiri compromise was lirought about by the efforts of Mr. (May, that he moved the re.soliitioiis providing for a joint committee of both HouHes, and was allowed to make out his own list of names for a committee, and (listributed it through the iloii.sc, to be voted for, ;tnd that the responsi- bility of the success of that movement devolved upon him. The argumeuth' he used in ISl!) in regard to the method in which he thought slavery would be extinguisheii. were .almost in idem rcrbia as tho.se em]>loy(Nl in his Alabama letter, of iMll. " Mr. Clny, in conductiiijf tlio Missouri coinpronii.se, found it iiPCRS.sary to argue that the admi.Mxioii of Mis-touri im a slavolioldiiiu State would ;iid in hriiiijiiij; about Itie termination of iil;iv«Ty. His nrL:iiiii<>iii is tlms stated liy tlie linn. Mr. S:irn and ever will be in practice, to raakea hamio- niou.s whole out of parts that are in priiu'ii)le and essence discordant. It is in vain to think of a ^incere union between the North and tlie Soutli, if the first remain true to her repub- lican priiifiples and habits, and the latter persist in her slaveliolding despotism. Tliey arc incai>ablt> troui their natures of being made one. They can no more be welded together into one bodv of uniform strength and consistency, than clay and brass. They may, it is true, be pres.scd toizi'ther. and made to cohere by extraneous aitpliances; and the line of contact may be daubed over and varnished, and concealef ))oslerity. J. Wakrrn'8 Book aho Job OyriCB, 51 Qhibwold 8t., Detroit. LIBRfiRV OF CONGRESS liiilliiiii nil 011 838 183 fi'