.m HOLLINGER pH8.5 MILL RUN F3-1543 E 426 .HIS Copy 1 SPEECH OF / HON. W. P. HALL, UF MISSOURI, '^. DELIVERED IN COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE, THE PRESIDENT'S MESSAGE BEING UNDER CONSIDERATION; THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, DECEMBER 11, 1851. WASHINGTON: PRINTED AT THE CONGRESSIONAL GLOBE OFFICE. 1851. \ SPEECH. Mr. HALL said: Mr. Chairman, it is not my ; intention to discuss the President's message. By the indulgence of the committee, I design to say a few words with reference to a bill I introduced into the House on yesterday. That bill proposes to grant to the State of Missouri the right of way and a portion of the public domain to aid in ; the construction of a railroad from Hannibal to St. Joseph. Some gentlemen seem startled at tlie project. I assure tliem it is nothing new nor un- j heard-of in the history of our country. It is only i about fifteen months since Congress made an ex- tensive grant of land to the State of Illinois, to aid in the construction of a railroad from Chicago to Mobile bay. I am not aware that that grant has ruined or seriously injured either this Government, or any State, or any individual. On the contrary, I believe it has been of general benefit. At all events, the road it was intended to promote will be one of vast importance, and is destined to exert a most happy influence on the country at large. It is not, however, to l)e concealed that the Chica- go and Mobile road must run nearly parallel with the greatest river on our continent, and must enter into competition with most of the great thorough- fares of the West. All the rivers of our great valley tend from the North to the South. The Ohio and its tributaries on the one hand, and the Missouri, the Arkansas, and the Red river and their tributaries on the other, in conjunction witli the Mississippi, open up the entire West to New Orleans and the Gulf of Mexico. But between the Atlantic seaboard and the New States there is no direct natural channel of intercommunication. Commerce can be carried on successfully between the old States and the Mississippi valley only by doubling Cape Sable or through means of artifi- cial avenues extending from the Atlantic coast far into the interior. Hence if the last Congress was justifiable in aiding the construction of a railroad from the northern lakes to the Gulf of Mexico, we shall be more than justified in aiding the con- struction of a highway from the extreme confines of Missouri to the States this side of the Allegha- nies — a highway which will open a direct, speedy, safe, and economical communication between parts of the Union that now hold intercourse only by the most circuitous, tardy, hazardous, and expen- sive routes. The Hannibal and St. Joseph rail- road will form an important part of such a line of intercommunication . The town of Hamiibal is situated on the west bank of the Mississippi river, in latitude 39'^ 45' north. The town of Saint Joseph is one hundred and eighty miles due west of Hannibal, on the east bank of the Missouri river. The city of Philadelphia, and the seats of government of Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois, are nearly on the same par- allel of latitude with the town of Hannibal. So that a railroad running due west from Philadelphia would pass through the centre of the States of Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois, cross the Mississippi at Hannibal, and strike the Missouri at Saint Jo- seph. Within eighteen months a railroad will be completed from Philadelphia to Pittsburg. Within the same time a railroad will be finished from Pittsburg to Columbus, Ohio. A railroad is nearly finished between Terre Haute, near the western line of Indiana, to Indianapolis, in that State. The Illinois cross-cut railroad is already finished from Springfield to the Illinois river, and in less than two years will be finished to the town of Gluincy, which is only twelve miles from Hannibal; so that in the course of a few years we may reasonably ex- pect to see a railroad communication complete between Philadelphia and the Mississippi river. 1 The construction of the Hannibal and Saint Jo- ' seph railroad will complete the connection as far I west as the Missouri. The same chain of rail- I roads, too, which will connect the western por- I tions of the State of Missouri with Philadelphia, I will unite with that great railway line already I extending from New York city to Cincinnati, and { also with the Baltimore and Ohio railroad, and j with the road from Louisville, by way of Nash- I ville, to Savannah, Georgia, and to Charleston, South Carolina. Thus, in a few years, may we hope to see the banks of the Missouri river, and the fertile country bordering thereon, brought with- in three days' travel of the metropolis of the I Union, and of the great cities of Charleston, Bal- j timore, Philadelphia, New York, and Boston. ' Nor is this all. The railroad from Chicago to the mouth of the Ohio river is to be completed within j a few years. The Hannibal and Saint Joseph railroad will connect with the Chicago and Cairo ro;\d, by means of the Springfield, Illinois, railroad. In this way will be opened to the South and to the northern lakes, as well as to the Atlantic seaboard, all the fertile country included within northern 1 Missouri, and all that immense country to the j west of our State, which is destined in a few years i to be the home of multitudes of white men. Let any one, sir, turn to the map of the United States, anil endeavor to trace out the line of railroads I which will most promote the welfare of the whole country, and he will inevitably fall upon that very line of which the Hannibal and Saint Joseph railroad makes a part. That road is on the par- allel of latitude which passes midway between the northern boundary of the United States and the mouth of the Mississippi river. It is on the hne which passes through the heart of Missouri, Illi- nois, Indiana, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. It is on the line which passes between the north- ern lakes and the Ohio river, at nearly an equal distance from each. It is on the line which divides the population of the United States into two equ£il parts. It is on the line which connects at the same time with the great New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia, and southern railroads, and by means of which, therefore, more distant and more numerous points of the Union can be brought into easy communication than any other which can be conceived. The opening of good roads between the eastern and western portions of the Union has been a favorite object with our greatest statesmen almost from the foundation of our Government. The Cumberland turnpike was projected by one of the " early Presidents," and has been carried forward at the expense of millions of dollars. In conse- quence of modern improvements, that work has become nearly useless. But the time has been when the Cumberland road, by its promise of opening a way from the old to the new States, was a mucii-cherished object with a large portion of the American people. It is now proposed to effect the same purpose by the greatest of modern im- provements without the cost of a dollar to the Government — without the exercise of any danger- ous or doubtful power, by the mere appropriation of a small portion of the public domain in a man- ner that will cover it with an industrious and active population, and convertit from a wilderness to cultivated farms and flourishing villages. There is no portion of this vast country which contains so large an area of fertile land, in proportion to its extent of surface, as northern Missouri. Yet that fertile and beautiful region is, to a great de- gree, a waste, because it possesses no channel for the transportation of its products. Its citizens are almost entirely dependent upon the Missouri river for getting to and returning from the markets of the country. That river is closed to steamboats for four months every year, and during the re- mainder of the time it is so difficult of navigation that tho.'se who ship by it are subject to much higher charges for transportation and insurance than the citizens of the neighboring States. The consequence is, that the farmers who live in the interior of northern Missouri, are almost as effect- ually shut out from all commerce with other sec- tions of the country as though tliey laid at the North pole. The Hannibal and St. .To.seph rail- road i.s to penetrate the very centre of that entire section, and will bring it as near market as some portions of the Atlantic States. Our farmers, stimulated by fair jirices for their produce, will open large farms, and our products will be multi- plied many fold. To the southern and eastern States we will sell stock, provisions, and our other staples. From them we will receive in return sugar, cotton, salt, rice, and fabrics. As our means increase our consumption will increase also. We will consume not only articles of domestic but of foreign manufacture, and thus, while we shall add to the home trade, we shall also increase the foreign commerce of the country, and swell the resources of the Government. If a proposition were submitted to connect New York or Boston with the extreme settlements of Missouri, all would admit the importance of the enterprise. Some would be willing, no doubt, to construct the road at the expense of the nation. No such charge upon the Treasury is, however, required in ortler to consummate a railroad commu- nication between the Missouri and the Atlantic seaboard. A railroad is nearly finished from New York city to Cincinnati. Indiana is extending this road to her western boundary. Illinois is extending it through her territory to the Missis- sippi river; and all that is necessary to complete the entire chain of railroad from Boston to Saint Joseph — indeed from Portland, Maine, to Saint Joseph — is to construct a railroad through the northern part of Missouri. The people of Missouri have, by an act of their Legislature, appropriated $1,500,000 to the Han- nibal and Saint Joseph railroad. Counties and individuals have taken a large amount of stock in the work. And now we ask Congress to do for us what they have so frequently done for other States. We ask you to give us alternate sections of the public lands, through which our road will pass, for six miles on each side of the road, to aid us in our enterprise This is not a proposition to take money out of the Treasury. If it was I would not advocate it. The effect of the proposi- tion will be, in my opinion, to increase the revenues of the Government. And why .' Because the alternate sections reserved by the United States are not to be sold for less than two dollars and a half per acre. Now they are liable to entry at one dollar and twenty-five cents per acre. So that you will receive as much, at least, from the public lands if this grant be made, as you will receive if it fail. Do gentlemen fear that the value of the public domain will not be enhanced by our road.' let me beg them to look at our condition, at our soil, as fertile as any in the world; at our situation, possessing none but the most expensive and tardy means of reaching a market, and then to reflect on the effect which similar roads have had elsewhere. No such work has ever been made even through the most densely settled sections, which has not great- ly enhanced the real estate in its neighborhood. How much greater enhancement of lands must follow the construction of a railroad through such a section as northern Missouri. It is now oc.upied by some three hundred thousand people; it is capable of sustaining a population of several millions. The making a railwaj^ through it will pour immi- grants into it until every foot of land .shall be occu- pied and improved. Its citizens now need mills, schools, churches, and many of the comforts of I life. A railroad will secure to them all these ad- vantages at one and the same time. In view of 1 these facts, it is a most stubborn skepticism which j doubts that the construction of the Hannibal and Saint Joseph railroad will appreciate the lands near it twofold or more. That appreciation will not be confined to the lands within six miles of the road. It will extend to lands even fifteen and twenty miles from it. Public lands that are not worth fifty cents an acre will readily bring the I minimum price. Lands that soldiers will not lo- I cate with their warrants will be eagerly .sought for this purpose, and the income of the Government from the public lands will be greatly augmented. This is not fancy. During the last Congres.s mil- lions of acres of public lands were given to soldiers. It was confidently predicted here and elsewhere that for many years we would, in consequence of the military grants, receive no money from the public lands; and yet we find that our revenues from that source have greatly increased within the last year, and are still rapidly increasing. Why is this.' Solely because numerous railroads are projected ] in the new States through the public domain. ] Some of these roads are now constructing. They have so largely appreciated the public lands that millions of acres are now bought which until re- ; cently were a drug in the market. This fact, and i this alone, explains why it is that the receipts from the public lands have increased, notwith- | standing the bounty act of the last Congress ■ and the immense emigration which has recently gone from the- Western States to Oregon and Cal- , ifornia. :i There is another piece of history in connection | with this matter, to which I must refer gentlemen of the committee. The only acts granting lands to new States, besides the Illinois grant of 1850, in which the price of the alternate sections reserved by Government was doubled, are those relating to certain lands in Ohio. The amount of those re- served sections is 259,423.96 acres, of which, up to the 30th of September last, nearly one half had been sold for two dollars and fifty cents per acre. No returns have been received as yet from the ' lands reserved by the grant of the last Congress to the State of Illinois. But the case of the Ohio grant .shows that the douiihng of the price of the alternate sections reserved to the United States in internal improvement grants is not a nullity. It is a reality which secures the Government from all loss. I trust it will be borne in mind, that under the acts granting land to soldiers, warrants can be [ located only on land subject to private entry. Now, all the lands in northern Missouri are sub- ject to private entry, and have been for sixteen years and more. Whatever, therefore, adds to the value of these lands is for the benefit of soldiers » having land warrants, whether in Maine, Virginia, j or Texas. So that the Hannibal and St. Joseph railroad grant is not only recommended by its i intrinsic merits, but by the tendency it will have i to benefit a large and most meritorious class of our citizens who are scattered all over the Union. What is theextenlof thegrantlask.' I am able to answer this question from official documeiits. The whole amount of public lands witliin six miles of each side of the proposed route of the Hannibal and St. Joseph railroad was, on the Uih day of April, 1847, 640,302 acres. A portion of these lands has passed into private hands since that time. All of them have been subject to private entry for many years— most of them sixteen years and upwards — so that they have been culled over and over again, and rejected as worth less than one dollar and twenty-five cents per acre. The most that Missouri can receive by the grant I ask is 320,181 acres of refuse land. She would not probably receive more than 250,000 acres if the grant should pass to-day. And in return for that, she not only engages to construct a railroad whi^h will enhance your public domain two or three times as much as this grant will amount to, but to carry your troops and munitions of war over the road free of all charge forever, and to transport your mails at such prices as you shall prescribe. ■ When Missouri came into the Union, the Fed- eral Government required her to promise not to tax the public lands within her limits " for the term of five years from and after the day of sale." In consideration of this promise, the United States agreed to pay to the State of Missouri five per cent, of the net proceeds of the sale of lands lying within her limits, of v.-hich three fifths was to be applied to purposes of internal improvements by her Legislature; and " the other two fifths in de- fraying, under the direction of Congress, the ex- penses to be incurred in the making of a road or roads, canal or canals, leading to the said State." In order to discharge a public debt, the United States have granted so me. 30 ,000 ,000 or 40,000,000 acres of land to those who have been in our mili- tary service in a time of war. A large amount of those lands has been located in Missouri, and more will be located there still. Those lands not being disposed of by this Government for money, the State of Missouri receives nothing for exempt- ing them from taxation. The strict letter of the compact does not, perhaps, entitle her to anything. But surely a fair and liberal spirit on the part of the United States will give Missouri some equivalent for not taxing the lands within her limits w4iich have been and will be located by mili- tary warrants. Missouri supposed that she was ' to receive a valuable consideration for her agree- ment not to tax tlie public lands " for the term of 1 five years from and after the day of sale." The United States so understood it. Now, suppose all ! the public domain in Missouri should be absorbed j by land warrants, what would she receive for not taxing the lands of this Government.' Nothing, I absolutely nothing. And would that be a fair and ' bona fide execution of her compact with the Uni- I ted States on the part of the latter.' On the con- trary, would not the United States be obnoxious to the charge of " palteruig in a double sense.-" of keeping "the word of promise to our ear and breaking it to our hope.'" 'I Missouri does not ask that the land given to sol- diers should be treated absolutely as land sold for cash. All she asks is, that inasmuch as the policy of granting bounty land is for the benefit of citizens of every State, each State shall bear its proportion of whatever expense and burden that policy costs. Missouri is willing to give up a part of her three per cent., but she'does not think she should be re- quired to relinquish all. And it appears tome that this Government cannot discharge the equita- ble demands of Missouri on better terms to the nation than by inakins: the grant I am urgmg. When Missouri makes a road through the land of her citizens, the landed proprietors benefited by the work are compelled to pay their share towai-ds its construction, in the form of taxes. As the value of their land is increased, their taxes are increased also. Now, this Government is a great landed proprietor, and owns large domains in the State of Missouri. Is it right, is it just, is it fair, under the.se circumstances, that while private indi- viduals are compelled to pay for improvements which add to the value of their estates, the Federal Government should receive precisely the same benefits and not contribute one dollar? Let gen- 6 tiemen from the old States revolve this matter in their minds, and I am sure they will dismiss some of the opposition which they manifest towards donations of kinds to the new States. It should be borne in mind that all the new States receive five per cent, of the net proceeds of the sales of the public lands within their limits, for the purposes of internal improvements, except Missouri, Illinois, Jndiana, and Ohio. They re- ceive but three per cent, for that object, the other two per cent, being retained in the Treasury for constructing, under the direction of Congress, a road or roads, a canal or canals, leading towards the limits of the enumerated States. It should also be rememltered, that this portion of the public lands is not given to the new States as a gratuity. It is given in return for the non-taxation of the public domain for a term of " five years from and after the day of sale." This arrangement has never been a favorite with the new" States. It originated with Congress, and was forced upon the Western States as a condition to their admis- sion into the Union. From the statement just made, it will be perceived that Missouri, Illinois, Indiana, and Ohio, stand on precisely the same grounds, so fir as their compacts with the United States are concerned. But how different, how widely difterent, is the treatment wliicli Congress has meted out to them. In Ohio §2,812,034 21 have been expended on the Cumberland road. In Indiana $,1,128,289 50, and in Illinois ^,749^445 30 have been spent on the same work. In Missouri not one single cent has been expended by this Government on any like enterprise. Besides this, Ohio has received upwards of eleven hundred thousand acres of public land for the purpose of internal improvements. Indiana has received up- wards of fourteen hundred thousand acres, and Illinois has received upwards of three millions of acres for ca)ials and railroads. Missouri has received nothing. Why this difference in the policy of Congress towards these four States.' Is not Missouri faithful in the discharge of her duties to the Union.' Is she not upright in her engage- ments with her sisters.' Is she not worthy'of membership in this Confederacy.' I have never heard any such charges made against Missouri, and I trust that the neglect of Congress has been unintentional. There is certainly no equity in treating Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois with marked kindness, while you turn away from Missouri as from a step-child. It is, however, objected, that the grants of land to the new States for the purposes of internal im- provement are injurious to the old States. In what way.' I inquire. It has been shown that those grants do not diminish the revenues of the country, but largely increase them. They diffuse the com- forts and conveniences of life into many a habha- tion and family that are now cheerless. They spread education and intelligence. They build up school-houses and churches, and they bring into communion and friendly intercourse disiant parts of the Republic. Surely there is nothing in all this of wliich any member of the Union ought to complain. But if the policy of granting land to the new States for railroad purposes is to stop, let justice be done to both sections of the Union. Hereto- fore those grants have been confined almost exclu- sively to the free States. Let Missouri , Arkansas, [ Mississippi, and other Southern States be placed upon an equal footing with Ohio, Indiana, and I Illinoi.s, before you ref'use all grants. To stop be- I fore this is done would give color, at least, to the charge sometimes made, that the majority of this House cannot and will not do justice to the South- I ern part of the Uiiion. I The old States should not overlook the fact that j they have received all the unappropriated lands j which were within their limits at the date of the I Revolution. Massachusetts and Maine, even at i this moment, possess a large domain that is undis- posed of. Now all of those lands were acquired by the common blood and treasure of the nation. The lands of Maine and Virginia and Georgia, which were unappropriated at the time of our Revolution, were as much the common acquisition of the whole Union, as the public lands in any of the Western States. But the old States, I reher- ate, received every foot of unappropriated land within their limits. " And yet when a new State asks for a small part of the public land within its limits, in discharge of high and important services, ren- dered by it in the construction of railroads through the Government domain, we hear the cry. Injustice to the old States. Place the new States on the same footing with the old States, and you would give them all the waste lands within their limits. This we do not ask. We are not so rapacious as the Atlantic States were when they occupied our position. All that we ask is a small appropria- tion, whicji, while it increases the receipts of the Treasury, will afford some remuneration for our services to the nation at large. No other expenditure of public money has re- sulted in so much and so general good as that which has had for its object the settlement of the West. Separate the new States from the old ones; strike off the Valley of the Mississippi, even in imagination, from the Atlantic seaboard, and you will possibly form some small conception of the benefits which the settlement and improvement of the public lands have had upon our national wealth, greatness, and prosperity. The fortifi- cation of your coast, your Navy, your Army, are all useful; but no statesman will pretend that any one or all of these combined has contributed one tenth as much to our reputation abroad, or our security at home, as the settlement of the great West. Now, while the settlement of the West has been of greater advantage to the whole coun- try than almost anything else which has trans- pired in our history, it has repaid by millions all the expenses it has occasioned to the Government. Your public domain has cost you $74,757,879 58. Up to this time it has yielded you $135,337,093 17— jusj: $60,381 ,213 79 more than it cost you. If the Navy, l>esides protecti)ig our commerce, had yield- ed to the Treasury double the money it has cost, how irresistible would be an application for an appropriation to that branch of the service ! But the settlement of the public domain has operated in that manner. It has increased the general welfare, it has augmented the resources and nnd- tiplied the power of the country, and it has at the same time repaid to the Government two dollars for every one it has cost. Will not gentlemen be instructed by the history of the past.' Experience has taught us that every foot of land brought under cultivation in a new State adds to the wealth and prosperity of all. " The current of emigration, from one part of the ' Union to the otlier — from the old to the new ' States — rolls back a golden tide of trade and l)usi- ' ness. The old States now supply nearly all the. ' wants of the farmers of the Valley of the West, ' and hence its prosperity wonderfully promotes ' the welfiire of the older States of the Union. The ' jioor emigrant from tlie old States, who estab- ' lishes a farm in the West, soon contributes more 'to the wealth and commerce of the State he left ' than if he had remained there ni dependent pov- ' erty. The prosperity of the new States reacts, ' through the channel of trade and business, m ' favor of the old States, and hence the wonderful 'growth of the whole country." This is a fair statement of the fact. Every man of observation knows it to be true, and still you hesitate to be lib- eral to the new States — no, sir, not liberal, but just. Mr. Chairman, Congress should either graduate the price of the public lands, or aid in enhancing the value of those which have been for a longtime in market. All the public lands near our navi- gable rivers are readily sold and settled. So it is with the best lands in the interior. But the public lands of the poorer class remain unoccupied for years after they have been subject to private entry, di- viding neighborhoods, keeping settlements sparse, and rendering it impossible, very frequently, for our people to enjoy even the blessings of common schools. In order to remedy this evil, the new States have been applying to Congress for more than a quarter of a century to graduate the price of the public domain. This has been steadily re- fused. Now, in order to settle our waste lands, we ask you to aid in increasing its value, by grants to railroads, which will enaljle Government to sell the public domain at its present minimum in all cases, and at double the minimum in many in- stances. I hope gentlemen will not oppose this policy because the new States are to be its immediate beneficiaries. What would bethoughtif the West should vote against a proposition to fortify an im- portant seaport because the money necessary to that purpose would be expended on the coast? Why, everybody would say, such a motive is unworthy an American citizen. Will you, then, apply a rule to the new States, which, if sought to be applied to the old States, would be repudiated as disgraceful in its conception and purposes.' Rather inquire whether the propositions relative to grants of land to the West, are for the benefit of the nation and within your constitutional pow- er. And being satisfied in the affirmative on both propositions, do not withhold your support be- cause the donation is to a new State. LiBRAtn OF CONGRESS 1 011 898 406 7 n