Class 1_ Book. Copyright H?._ COPWHGHT DEPOSIT I THE INFINITE PEESENCE THE INFINITE PRESENCE BY GEORGE M. GOULD, M.D. NEW YORK MOFFAT, YARD AND COMPANY 1910 -^5*^ Qj^ Copyright, 1910, by MOFFAT, YARD & COMPANY NEW YORK All Eights Reserved )GLA2730S3 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I. The Infinite Presence ... 1 II. The Biologic Basis of Ethics and Eeligion 39 III. The Eole of Maternal Love in Organic Evolution .... 93 IV. Immortality . . . . . . 154 V. Back to the Old Ways ... 213 THE INFINITE PRESENCE CHAPTER I THE INFINITE PKESENCE 1 Kant said that two things were sublime : the starry heavens above, and the moral law within. Upon reflection, the stars sug- gest to "the natural man" but a crude, vague, and far from infinite idea of in- finity, and many experts have " explained" the moral law as a utilitarian and evolu- tionary product. The philosopher's rev- erence serves, nevertheless, to divide the infinities into two classes, like all other phenomena, those without and those with- in, objective and subjective, or macrocos- mic and microcosmic. It will be found that a third class must be added which will comprise a number that belong to i The Atlantic Monthly, December, 1904. I 2 THE INFINITE PRESENCE neither world exclusively, but are the joint product of both. In a rigid Berkeleian or Hegelian analysis all would be subjective ; in a looser one all equally more or less composite; and especially if one accepts language at its par value, and common sense at its own rating. The eye of the mind that does not infer sees the starry firmament simply as light- points in a dark blue setting. Distant these points are indeed, but any very great distance is a teaching of hearsay, or inference, and only the astronomer, or one he has taught, has more than a vague and extremely finite conception of their immeasurable distance. The shepherds thought the guiding-star of Bethlehem moved and stood over the manger in which lay the wonderful child. They had no hint of the amazing distance, even of the nearest star, and possibly even Kant's thought of it was vague as compared with that we now hold. How many Americans and Europeans to-day suppose that a meteor is truly a "falling star"? That a star could not move, or point out a local- ity upon the earth, or the earth itself, is INFINITE PRESENCE 3 not to be understood by the shepherd mind. If a newspaper reader has seen a long string of figures expressing a guess at the distances of stars, they of course express to him no idea more definite than if the numbers were one tenth or ten times as many. It becomes at once the some- thing non-finite, as do all such things not cognizable by his assumed finiteness. The infinite is thus to most a mere nega- tive, whatever its nature, an impatient naming of the unexplored and unnam- able. If one attempts to bring to the or- dinary mind a somewhat more adequate thought or picture of the infinite, trying to replace its negative by