-^ X'' * -.0 V-O^ •lil -ov^ :^^.'- -^^0^ f'^^M; -ov^ ^'i^/i^-.' '-^.^^ ^ .^* .■^^^-._ *^^^^^ ..^^., -^^^^^^z /J^-, u^^^^ ,.^,^,,,,. .,. ^-- THE JEWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA Of this edition^ on Hand-made paper ^ one hundred and seventy-five copies have been printed / This is Number : -^ A jntoeioi- of tin* IHIlOiJlfiliLfii^S'y <-i'^yiM'A'>U ©vO'lE! «»f ('liHrl».-«t«)ii S.C DcNiioyc*! li\' Kin- .the » '^' April IJW« . ■ i'flu^i/fd //SS. a/Zm 1 W D SOUTH 3 LIN A FROM i .AK^ HS.Th l&LUHtM, CHARLES PRRS PHILAD ' s moi'i INTERIOR OF THE SYNAGOGUE IN I 794 From a lithograph in the possession of the Hon. Mayer Sulzberger, of Philadelphia THE JEWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA FROM THE EARLIEST TIMES TO THE PRESENT DAY BY BARNETT A. ELZAS, M.D., LL.D. ASSOCIATE OF JEWs' COLLEGE, LONDON HOLLIER SCHOLAR, UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, LONDON RABBI OF K. K. BETH ELOHIM, CHARLESTON, S. C. PRESS OF J. B. LIPPINCOTT COMPANY PHILADELPHIA 1905 # ^ ,• TO THE FRIEND OF MY YOUTH MADAME EMILY S. KIEFE OF PARIS THIS VOLUME IS AFFECTIONATELY INSCRIBED BY THE AUTHOR ** Wherever possible, let us not be told about this man or that. Let us hear the man himself speak, let us see him act, and let us be left to form our own opinions about him. The historian, we are told, must not leave his readers to themselves. He must not only lay the facts before them : he must tell them what he himself thinks about those facts. In my opinion this is precisely what he ought not to do." — Froude on The Science of History. PREFACE write a comprehensive history of the Jews of South Carolina is to-day a task of no small difficulty : not that there is any dearth of material at the disposal of the historian, but by reason of the very vastness of that material, of which scarcely anything has hitherto Deen utilized. Twenty years ago the task would have been a much easier one. There were then several people still living in Charleston who were born in the first decade of the nine- teenth century and who could have filled in many an inter- esting gap that must now remain void. Strange as it may seem, very little of historical value has been written on the subject. Four brief sketches of the Jewish Congregation at Charleston, by the late Nathaniel Levin, in the first volume of Leeser's Occident, reproduced in substance in the Year Book of the City of Charleston for 1883, useful as far as they go but exceedingly imperfect and erroneous; a few biographical notices in Markens's The Hehreivs in America and in the recently published Jewish EncyclopcBdia; a few items collected in the Puhlications of the American Jewish Historical Society, and a few mis- cellaneous articles in the Jewish newspapers of the last fifty years are all that we possess. For the rest, the data have been buried in the voluminous records of various character existing in South Carolina and in the newspaper files of the 7 8 PREFACE last hundred and seventy years. The story is here pre- sented for the first time from original sources. Until quite recently the Congregation Beth Elohim had no records prior to 1866. These were long supposed to have been burnt in Columbia, where they were sent for safe- keeping during the war between the States. A singular accident has brought most of these books, beginning with the year 1800, to light again. They form, indeed, a most re- markable collection, and correct many fictions that till now have passed current as history. In the preparation of this work the author has carefully collated all files of newspapers published in Charleston from 1732 to the present time; he has examined all the public documents of the State from the earliest times to the present day ; he has ransacked the historical collections of the Charleston Library Society, the South Carolina His- torical Society, the Winyah Indigo Society, the Library of Congress, the New York Public Library, and the Wis- consin State Historical Society ; and the treasures of many private libraries have passed through his hands. In the following chapters tradition will play but an in- significant part. A whole volume might be written on the traditions of the Jews of South Carolina, but it is perhaps as well to let these traditions die. Traditions, while inter- esting to the general reader, do not help the truth of history. The story will therefore be treated objectively. The records will speak for themselves. Here and there personal interpretation of the documents and of the facts will be necessary. They will be interpreted in as faithful a light as possible, nothing extenuated and nothing set down in malice. The author would here acknowledge his deep sense of obligation to numerous friends without whose assistance this volume could never have been carried to successful completion: to the late General Edward McCrady, whose PREFACE 9 name will ever be indissolubly associated with the history of South Carolina ; to the late Henry A. de Saussure, Esq., whose valuable collection of historical material he ungrudg- ingly placed at his disposal; to Mr. A. S. Salley, Jr., the able secretary till recently of the South Carolina Historical Society, whose time and knowledge have been unsparingly drawn upon on innumerable occasions ; to the Hon. William A. Courtenay, of Newry, who, at his own expense, sent to him some of his most precious volumes; to Mr. Yates Snowden, late of The Neivs and Courier, who has called his attention to many suggestive data ; to Mr. A. S. Freidus and Mr. Wilberforce Eames, of the New York Public Library; to J. Quintus Cohen, Esq., of New York, to whom the author is indebted for much valuable material; and, finally, to Henry A. M. Smith, Esq., of Charleston, to whose unceasing encouragement the publication of this volume is largely due. The author would only add that the following chapters are the result of several years of steady work done in the intervals of a busy life. He has striven to make the story as complete and as accurate as possible. Other facts may yet come to light, but all the sources at present available have been laid under contribution. Many interesting data have doubtless been omitted, but the author only claims to tell the story in as far as it is revealed in the records. When the reader considers the immensity of the task here undertaken, and the fact that this history is now written for the first time, the author feels that he may reasonably seek indulgence for any small shortcomings of which he may unconsciously be guilty. Charleston, S. C, September, 1905. CONTENTS Preface PAGE 7 CHAPTER I Beginnings. 1670-1750 17 CHAPTER II Organization. 1750-1775 30 CHAPTER III Moses Lindo 47 CHAPTER IV Francis Salvador 68 CHAPTER V The Revolutionary Period 73 CHAPTER VI Joseph Salvador 103 CHAPTER VII 1783-1800 119 CHAPTER VIII 1800-1824 131 11 12 CONTENTS CHAPTER IX PAGE The Reformed Society of Israelites 147 CHAPTER X 1824-1860 166 CHAPTER XI Religious Development. 1824-1860 203 CHAPTER XII The War Between the States 220 CHAPTER XIII Smaller Communities 241 CHAPTER XIV Modern Period. 1865-1905 260 Miscellaneous Biographies 268 APPENDIX A The Act for Making Aliens Free 276 APPENDIX B Directories (a) 1695-1750, (b) 1750-1783, (c) 1783-1800 277 APPENDIX C The Salvador Grant of Arms 280 APPENDIX D The Hebrew Benevolent Society 282 APPENDIX E The Hebrew Orphan Society 285 CONTENTS 13 APPENDIX F PAGE The Congregation Beth Elohim. 1800-1824 287 APPENDIX G Ministers of Beth Elohim. 1750-1905 292 APPENDIX H Old Jewish Cemeteries in South Carolina 293 Bibliography 295 Index 307 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS PAGE Interior of the Synagogue in 1794 Frontispiece From a lithograph in the possession of the Hon. Mayer Sulzberger, of Philadelphia An Early Jewish Advertisement 26 From The South-Carolina Gazette, April 19, 1735 The Salvador Grant of Arms from the Heralds' College, London 68 Original in the possession of the College of Charleston. Irreparably damaged by water during the South Carolina Inter-State and West Indian Exp)osition in 1902, after the photo was taken from which this plate was made Captain Abraham Mendez Seixas, 1750-1799 78 From an original oil-painting in the possession of Mr. Leopold H. Cohen, of New York Signatures of Jews during the Siege of Charles Town in 1780 . . 91 Originals in the Emmet Collection, New York Public Library Tombstone of Joseph Salvador (1716-1786), Da Costa Burial- Ground, Charleston, South Carolina 108 Jacob Cohen (1741-1808), President of the Congregation Beth Elohim in 1790 119 From an original oil-painting in the possession of J. Quintus Cohen, Esq., of New York A Page from the Treasurer's Cash Book for the Year 1800 131 From the Archives of the Congregation Beth Elohim, recovered by the author Major Raphael J. Moses, 1812-1893 166 General Edwin Warren Moise, 1832-1903 220 Theodore Kohn, 1840-1902 241 The Original Seal of the Hebrew Benevolent Society 282 !l THE JEWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHAPTER /—BEGINNINGS 1670-1750 HE history of South Carolina is a thrill- ing history. From her settlement in 1670 to our own day it has been one long tale of glorious achievement. In not a few things has South Carolina set the pace to her sister States, but in nothing may she feel a more jus- tifiable pride than in the broad and liberal principles on which she was founded. "In the year 1669, the Lords 'did encourage severall people to come in their Vessells to inhabitt this part of their province «& with the said people did alsoe send Fundamll Lawes, Constitucons under the hands & Seales of six of their Lordshipps bearing date 21st July, '69, as the unalter- able forme & rule of Governmt for ever. ' " ^ This Constitution of John Locke (1669) was a veritable Magna Charta of liberty and tolerance. South Carolina ^ Note of Langdon Cheves to " Shaftesbury Papers," Vol. 5, Collections of the South Carolina Historical Society, p. 117. 17 18 THE JEWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA started right. Our chief concern being with the Jews of South Carolina, it would be well to note carefully Article 87 of this wise and far-seeing Constitution : " 87. But since ye natives of yt place who will be concemd in or. plantations are utterly strangers to Christianity, whose idoUatry, igno- rance, or mistake gives us noe right to expell or use ym. ill, & those who remove from other parts to plant there, will unavoydably be of diffrent opinions concerning matters of religion, ye liberty whereof they will expect to have allowed ym., & it will not be reasonable for us on this account to keep ym. out yt civil peace may be maintaind amidst ye diversity of opinions, & our agreement & compact with all men may be duly & faith- fully observed, ye violation whereof upon what p'tence soever, cannot be without great offence to Almighty God, & great scandal to the true religion yt we p'fesse, & also yt heathens, Jues, and other disenters from the purity of Christian religion may not be scared and kept at a distance from it, but by having an oppertunity of acquainting themselves with ye truth & reasonablenes of its doctrines, & ye peacablenes & inoffen- civenes of its professors, may by good usage and perswasion, & ail those convincing methods of gentlenes & meeknes sutable to ye rules & designe of the Ghospel, be wone over to imbrace and unfeynedly receive ye truth. Therefore any seaven or more persons agreeing in any religion shall con- stitute a church or profession to wch. they shall give some name to dis- tinguish it from others." * Little wonder, then, that the persecuted Jew, like the per- secuted Huguenot and German Palatine, soon came here to find a haven of rest. To be undisturbed in the possession of "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness," and to en- joy the privilege of worshipping God as his conscience dic- tated — these have ever been the ideals of the Jew, even as they were the ideals upon which this great Republic was established. For by far the greater part of his history, in every country, some or all of these "inalienable rights of man ' ' have been denied him. Here he could have them all, and in fullest measure. South Carolina welcomed him, welcomed him as a man and as a citizen, and the Jew showed Shaftesbui-y Papers," p. 113. BEGINNINGS 19 himself worthy of the confidence that was reposed in him. It is no idle boast to claim that there are none who have shed more lustre upon the annals of this State or have done more towards its upbuilding than have its Jewish citizens. When did the Jews first come here and where did they come from? Thereby hangs an interesting tale. In the Charleston Library there is a reprint of a unique volume .entitled A New Description of that Fertile and Pleasant Province of Carolina, by John Archdale, Late Governor of the Same. (London, 1707.) On page 22 we read the following quaint narrative : "Now that the Reader may plainly discern, that the Almighty and Omniscient God, takes cognizance of Human Affairs, and directs them by a wise and prudent Chain of Causes, I shall relate some remarkable Passages that happened quickly after that I ent—ed upon the Govern- ment, which was the 17th of August, 1695. There is a Nation of Indians call'd the Yammassees, who formerly liv'd under the Spanish Govern- ment, but now live under the English, about 80 Miles from Charles-Town. Some of these Indians going a Hunting, about 200 Miles to the South- ward, met with some Spanish Indians that lived about Sancta Maria, not far from Augustine, the Seat of the Spanish Government; and taking them Prisoners, brought them Home, designing to sell them for Slaves to Barhadoes or Jamaica as was usual ; but I understanding thereof, sent for their King, and ordered him to bring these Indians with him to Charles-Town, which accordingly he did: There were three Men and one Woman; they could speak Spanish, and I had a Jew for an Interpreter, so upon examination I found they profess'd the Christian Religion as the Papists do; upon which I thought in a most peculiar manner, they ought to be freed from Slavery; and thereupon order'd the King to carry them to Augustine to the Spanish Governour with a Letter, desiring an Answer relating to the receit of them ; who having received them ; sent me the following Letter ; So far as relates to this Affair, I copy it forth :" (Here follows the letter, which is of no interest to our investigation.) So there was a Jew in Charles Town in 1695. There were other Jews here, too, at that early date. Hereby, also, hangs an interesting tale. 20 THE JEWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA After the revocation of the Edict of Nantes in 1685 a con- siderable number of French Huguenots refugeed to South Carolina. They had fled from persecution at home and here they were treated as aliens and denied the liberty of sub- jects.3 Toleration, however, as we have seen, was the funda- mental principle of the Constitution, and when the Hugue- nots appealed to the Lords Proprietors to redress their numerous grievances, as soon as the temper of the colonists permitted, the General Assembly passed for their especial relief An Act for the making aliens free of this part of the Province and for granting liberty of conscience to all Protestants.'^ There were sixty-four men who were made citizens under this Act of 1697 and among them were four Jews : Simon Valentine, merchant ; Jacob Mendis, merchant ; Avila, mer- chant ; and , merchant, — the name of the fourth being unfortunately obliterated in the original text.^ A copy of the naturalization papers of one of these Jews, Simon Val- entine, is preserved in an old volume in the Secretary of State's Office in Columbia.® It reads as follows: " CAROLINA " The Rt Honble Joseph Blake Esqr, one of the true and absolute Lds and Proprietors of the Province of Carolina Commandr in Chief vice Admiral and Governr of South Carolina " To all Judges Justices Magistrates, ministors & officers Ecclesiastical and Civil and to all psons whatsoever to whome this shall come to be seen heard read or known ^ Dalcho : Historical Account of the Protestant Episcopal Church in South Carolina, p. 28 et seq. * This Act was passed in March, 1696-7. In the old style, the year ended on March 25. According to our method of writing, it would be 1697. For the main provisions of the Act, see Appendix A. ^ The full list of names is given in Trott's Laws of the Province of South Carolina, p. 62, also in The Statutes of South Carolina, Vol. 2, pp. 131-133. ' Grants, Sales, etc.. Book D, 1703-9. BEGINNINGS 21 " GREETEING "KNOW Yee that Simon Valentine Mercbt: an alien of ye Jewish Nation borne out of the Crown of England hath Taken his oath of Alle- giance to our Sovereigne Lord William ye Thii'd over England Scott- land France and Ireland King &c Defender of ye faith and hath done every other thing wch by an act of assembly made att Charles Town in ye ninth Yeare of ye Reigne of our Sovereign Lord King Willm, &c, Anno Dom: One Thousd Six hundred ninety Six and Seven entituled an Act to make alien free of this pte of the Province and for granting Liberty of Conscience to all Protestants as one is required to do And is fully and effectually to all Intents Constructions and Purposes Qualified and Capacitated to have use and Enjoy all the rights Priviledges Powers and Immunityes Given or Intended to bee given to any Alien then In- habitant of South Carolina by the aforesd Act to Certifie wch I have hereunto Sett my hand and Caused the Publick Scale to be affixed at Charles Town the Twenty Sixth day of May Anno Dom. one Thousd six hundi'ed ninety and seaven. "JOSEPH BLAKE." This Simon Valentine must have been a man of consider- able prominence in Charles Town, for we meet with him far more frequently in the records than we do any other Jew of the period. He came to Charles Town from New York, in the records of which city his name occurs as having paid for his '■ ' burgher right ' ' in 1682. He was a party to a law- suit in Albany, New York, in 1684. His full name appears to have been Simon Valentine Vander-Wilden.'^ We find him in Charles Town in 1696, where he signs his name as a surety on an administration bond.^ His name appears several times on similar documents.^ He signs his name Simon Valentijn. In 1698 ''Abraham Avilah, of Charles Towne, in ye County of Berkeley and Province of Carolina, for divers 'Hon. Simon Rosendale: "An Early Ownership of Real Estate in Albany, New York, by a Jewish Trader," Publications of the American Jewish Historical Society, Vol. 3, pp. 68-71. See also ibid., No. 8, p. 22. " Probate Court Records, Book 1692-3, pp. 280-281. " Ibid., pp. 248, 256, 357. See also Book 1671-1727, p. 71. 22 THE JEWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA good causes and considerations me at this time especially moveing and more especially out of trust and confidence which I repose in Mr. Simon Valentine M-cht," makes him his true and lawful attorney.^ "^ He must have had business relations with Jamaica, for on July 3, 1701, ''Jacob Mears, of ye Parish of Port Royall, in ye Island aforesaid" (Jamaica), appoints ''his trusty friend William Smith, of Carolina, merchant, his true and lawfull Attorney, to demand of Simon Valentine, of Caro- lina, shopkeeper, all and every such Debt and Debts, Sum and Sums &c, as may be owing to him." ^^ The last reference to this Simon Valentine is of particu- lar interest, inasmuch as it is the earliest record of a Jew holding land in South Carolina. On November 23, 1715, Mordicai Nathan mortgages to Henry Peronneau a farm of three hundred and fifty acres, which land, the deed tells us, "was formerly purchased by the said Mordicai Nathan and Symond Valentine, Deceased, being Joyn purchers, whom the said Mordicai has survived." ^^ They had bought the land as joint-tenants and according to the old law, which has since been repealed by statute, it fell to the survivor. It is not practicable to tell a connected story yet. There is as yet no organized community. Apart from what we gather from the records themselves, we know nothing of the individuals mentioned, though descendants of some of "Probate Court Records, Book 1694-1704, p. 133. The name also appears on p. 410 of this volume, on a document bearing the date January 24, 1703-4. " Ibid., 339. " Ibid., Book Miscellaneous Records, 1714-1717, p. 233. This Mordicai Nathan, like Simon Valentine, came to Charles Town from New York. His name occurs in a list of " The Jews' Contributions" towards the finishing of the steeple of Trinity Church, in New York, This list is dated May 1, 1711. See Sparger in The American Hebrew for June 26, 1903. BEGINNINGS 23 these early settlers are still in South Carolina. There may have been a semblance of a community about this time, but we do not know of any communal organization prior to 1750. As one of the main objects of this volume is to preserve the early memorials of the Jews of this State, many of which are crumbling to pieces and will soon be no longer in existence, and the rest in imminent danger of being irre- vocably lost, this end would be defeated if we dismissed this pre-organization period in a few hasty generalizations. To carry out our purpose it will be necessary to give an exhaustive list of references to the Jews of South Carolina prior to 1750, preserving the chronological order as far as possible. The first document, then, to which our attention is at- tracted is an old will. It is the oldest Jewish will on record in South Carolina: " In the Name of God Amen I : Abraham Isack of Cyty of New Yorke Being bound to Sea and therefore being present in good health, but not knowing when it may please the Almighty God to take me out of ye world my Will is yt after my just debts are paid I bequeath all my Estate whatsoever be it in houses Lands Good Chatles or what else unto my Dear and Loveing Sister Sarah Isack & to her heires for ever shee paying out of ye same ye Sum of ten Pounds New Yourke mony to my Brother Henry Isack if Liveing, after my Deceas and I do Constitute and appoynt my dear Sister Sarah my whole and Sole Executrix of this my Will, revokeing all Wills by me heretofore made and this alone to Stand in Force. In Testimony wereof I have hereunto Sett my hand and Seale in New Yorke this Twenty Sixth day of May Anno Dom. One Thousand Seven hundred & Nine. " Signd Seald published and Declared by ye said Abra: Isack in ye presence of us Edmd. Creiswell Jno Basford "ABRAHAM ISACK (Seale) " Recorded Febry 20th 1710 per J. H. D. Secy." " Probate Court Records, Book Wills, 1671-1727, p. 91. 24 THE JEWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA It is some years before the records make further mention of Jews. In an old volume in the Secretary of State 's Office in Columbia there is a bond from Edward Home Forest to Mr. Joseph Tobias, shopkeeper, of Charles Town, dated 1737.^* This Joseph Tobias was the first President of the Congregation Beth Elohim when it was organized in 1750. He is mentioned in a list of those who paid quit rent in 1739.^^ His name occurs also in an old volume of mort- gages.^'' In the documents copied from the State Paper Office in London his name is included in a "List of per- sons qualified according to the Act for naturalising Protes- tants in his Majesty's Colonies in America." He is granted a "Jew Certificate." This document was recorded on De- cember 11, 1741.^^^ We meet with him several times in the Charleston records in the office of Register of Mesne Con- veyances.^^ He advertises for the first time in The South- Carolina Gazette of November 5, 1737. He died on January 29, 1761, aged seventy-six. The last reference to Jews in the records during this period occurs in the Probate Court Records for 1736-1740. On page 300 there is a bond of Samuel Levy and Moses Solomons, of Charles Town, merchants, to Daniel La Roche and Thomas La Roche, of Winyau, for £2605.6.8. It is dated March 20, 1741. On page 3 of this volume there is a letter from New York, dated November 25, 1743, and addressed to Messrs. Daniel and Thomas La Roche, of Charles Town. Mr. Jacob Franks refers to his nephew, Mr. Moses Solomons, and some difficulty which the said "Records in the Secretary of State's Office, Columbia, Book MM, pp. 191-3. These records will hereafter be referred to as " Columbia Records." " Ibid., Receipts of the Quit Rent, 1732-1741. " Ibid., Book YY. " Ibid. "Mesne Conveyance Records, Book W, p. 471, Book PP, p. 696, Book Inventories, 1749-1750, p. 75. BEGINNINGS 25 Moses Solomons had had with a London shipping house. On the next page David Franks, of Charles Town, Gent., declares that the letter signed Jacob Franks is in the hand- writing of his father. It would seem from another letter here recorded that Franks had connections in Lisbon. In this letter reference is made to Moses Solomons 's intention of going to India. It is worthy of note that David Franks 's name is mentioned in the list of members of the St. An- drew's Society of Charles Town for 1740-1748. Leaving the records, let us now look at the Jews of early South Carolina in their private life. As we have seen, the Jew here has never labored under any civil or religious disability whatsoever. As early as 1703 it is on record that Jews voted at the popular election for members of the Com- mons House of Assembly. This toleration on the part of the Established Church party in South Carolina brought forth a protest from the bigoted Dissenters of that day, who complained that ''at this last Election, Jews, Strangers, Sailors, Servants, Negroes and almost every French man in Craven and Berkely county came down to elect, & their Votes were taken, & the persons by them voted for were returned by the Sheriff." ^^ McCrady points out that this protest was especially directed against the Huguenots, and it was by reason of the fact that they would not join the Dissenters to control the Province that their indignation was aroused.^^ The protest was carried to England, Joseph Boone being sent over to present their grievances. He presented a petition to the Lords Proprietors but met with little sympathy ; he managed, however, to present a memorial to the House of Lords on behalf of himself and many other inliabitants of " Rivers : A Sketch of the History of South Carolina, Appendix, p. 459. "" McCrady : South Carolina under the Proprietary Government, pp. 391-2. 26 THE JEWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA the Province of Carolina, and also of several merchants of London trading to Carolina, setting forth the "dangerous situation and the threatened ruin of the trade of the Colony to the great prejudice of her Majesty's Customs," etc. By intrigue and misrepresentation, the Dissenters gained the day.^^ There is nothing to show, however, that the Jews were ever subsequently interfered with in the exercise of the franchise. The next point of interest in our investigation is the question of how the Jews earned their livelihood in those early days. Here the wonderful collection of Gazettes that have been preserved in the Charleston Library will throw the fullest light. There were but few professional men in the Province in those days. With the exception of a small number of handi- craftsmen, the entire population subsisted by planting and trade. Competition must have been very keen, for every- body seems to have had almost the same things for sale and to have advertised them in the very same way. Let us look at the advertisements in the South-Carolina Gazettes be- tween the years 1731 and 1750.22 We do not meet with any Jewish names in the Gazettes prior to 1734. In that year Messrs. Carvallo & Gutteres announce that they ''have to dispose of Good Old Bar- bados Rum. Good Madera Wine. Muscovado Sugar & Lime- juice ; Likewise some dry goods, &c, living in Church street, where formerly the printing office was."^^ On April 19, 1735, they are in Broad Street with a large selection of goods. The accompanying fac-simile of their advertisement will give an idea of the contents of a typical "' McCrady : South Carolina under the Proprietary Government, pp. 425 et seq. " These references to the Jews of South Carolina, 1731-1750, are prac- tically exhaustive. "" The South-Carolina Gazette, August 17, 1734. »ro be i^of^ vcci DCI1. boy Ca- reaibnablc rates, by wn AN EARLY JEWISH ADVERTISEMENT From The South-Carolina Gazette, April 19, 1735 .->f .-. .-US olony o. By d the Jew8 luently int se of *■ ^f inter Jews V e the wonderli rved in the Charleston JLiDrary will tiirow t few professional men in the Province in of a small ofhandi- t -p-v.iUizitstT^QA mvffsi Yj»Aa-«ii in the Gazettes ^'e ■I Carolima u ro the Jewg of S-. ;o prac- nn Gazf.tie. AiiE'ir- •*ro be ^OlD by Mflrs Carvallo and Cut- /rr<'/ at their btore in Broad-ftreet, China taftetjcs, i\\k romiiils, chcrrydaries, ginghams, lundiy (brts of Bcngaic, fjlk damaiks, liUc handkerchiefs, fillc brocades, indi a per- fians, broadcloths with liningsand trimmings, duroys with ditto, fhaloons, 3 foarth, 7 eighth and yard wide garlixs, platillociiy b^ holland*, iiidia and englifli chims, fcveral colot:fs of cotton romals,calIimancocs,whitc callicocs,miird and knitted caps, black durante, filk camlets with trim- mings, mens & boys woofted& thread hofc, flowcr'd fring'd & plain ribbons, Hat & round filk laces, dyapcr, tabic cloths & napkins of ditto, pinsjivofycombs, fine nuns thread, whi- tcd brown thread, brown oinabfigs,biuc linnen, ruflia lin- Dcn, 5 founh linnen, checks, filk Itays, bohca tea, mens & boys fine hats, mens, boys, womcns & girls fhocs, Boxes of Caftilc fbap, ofdip't candles, & very good Limcjuicc, all at reaibnablc rates, by whole falc and retail. w BEGINNINGS 27 store in Charles Town in the early years of the eighteenth century. On September 13, 1735, they are in Elliott Street. On November 8, 1735, Mr. Carvallo, in Elliott Street, advertises for sale '*A very good Rhode Island Pacing-Horse." On January 17, 1735-6, they announce that they intend to leave the Province early in the spring, and on January 31st Aaron Gutterez advertises in his own name. They seem to have carried out their intention of leaving the Province, for this is the last mention of them. On March 30, 1738, Mr. Is: Depaz, in Union Street, ad- vertises for the first time. On September 7, 1738, he adver- tises as Isaac De Pas, offering to sell ' ' Good White Sugar, very good Barbados Eum & very fine Citron Water," etc., etc. On March 8, 1739, he advertises as Isaac De Paz. On February 20, 1744, as Isaac De Pass, he advertises his wares at his shop on Broad Street, and on March 19, 1744, he an- nounces to his patrons that ''All gentlemen that have rice to dispose of may have two Parts in ready Cash and the Balance in Cordials of all sorts, or any other goods that I have to sell."^^ On August 25, 1739, we read the following: ''To Be Sold in Union St, by Moses de Mattos, White, Milk, Ship, Mid- dling & Brown Bread & Loaf Sugar. The same may be had of Mr. Tobias on the Bay. Also good Esopius Flour." He is still in Union Street on November 1, 1742. The next notice is interesting, as one of the earliest refer- ences to social life in South Carolina. On March 26, 1741, we read of the establishment of the ' ' Right Worthy & Ami- cable Order of Ubiquarians, by some gentlemen, members of the Grand Convention in England. ' ' The following para- graph informs us of the purposes of this Society: " The original name is De Paz. There are many descendants of this Isaac De Paz still living in South CaroUna. They are no longer identified, however, with the Jewish faith. 28 THE JEWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA " This order is justly celebrated at home, for the generous and benevo- lent principles of its institution. It has ever been conducted with the most genteel ease and decency and attended with the greatest improve- ment of any Society hitherto erected. It's no secret, that the Roman Constitution in its most perfect state, is the settled polity of this most worthy order; as the virtue and morality of the antient Romans are the models recommended to the imitation of every person, who aspires to become an accomplished member of it. Induced by such laudable purposes, under so right an oeconomy, several gentlemen of Tast and Distinction have been enfranchis'd here, by the Praetor, Censors and Senators." Many distinguished people in Charles Town were mem- bers of this Society. In the Gazette of April 3, 1742, we read that at its half-yearly Festival, Moses Solomon, Esq., was one of the ^dils. This Moses Solomon was a member of the St. Andrew's Society of the City of Charles Town between 1740 and 1748. We have met him before in the records. The next reference in the Gazettes is the earliest death notice of a Jew in South Carolina and the only one prior to 1750. " On Sunday, the 8th instant, the Charles-Town, one of the Govern- ment's Gallies, having sailed over the Bar to convoy a Sloop, met with a sudden hard Gale of Wind, overset, and sunk, 10 men were drowned, and among them was Mr. Hart the Jew." ^ Who this Mr. Hart was we do not know, for it is the only reference to him. In 1748 we have a notice of Mr. Solomon Isaacs. He is a plaintiff in a lawsuit.^^ In the same year Solomon Isaacs & Co. offer for sale ' ' Negro Cloth and other woolen goods, linnens, callicoes, ironware and sundry other goods, at the The South-Carolina Gazette, April 16, 1744. ' Ibid., April 27, 1748. BEGINNINGS 29 House on the Bay, in which Capt. Colcock lives. ' ' ^^ This is the last Jewish advertisement prior to 1750. So far the records and the Gazettes. Summing up our investigation thus far: We found a Jew in Charles Town in 1695, and several Jews prior to 1700. They probably came directly from London, though some may have come here from Jamaica or Barbadoes, where Jews have lived from an early date.^^ It is worth remembering that the West Indies furnished South Carolina with many of its most substantial citizens in the Provincial period. We have followed the Jew in his daily life and as a citizen. We have seen how, socially and religiously, he was at peace with his neighbors. He lived the same life and followed the same occupations, taking his full part in the burdens as well as in the privileges of citizenship. There were other Jews living in Charles Town in the year 1750 — of these we shall tell in the next chapter. The South-Carolina Gazette, Oct. 3, 1748. Hotten : List of Emigrants to America, 1600-1700. CHAPTER //—ORGANIZATION 1750-1775 N the last chapter we saw that quite a number of Jews were living in Charles Town prior to 1750. A few years be- fore there was an accession to the community from the neighboring col- ony of Georgia. Georgia was colonized in 1733, and we are told that a few days after its first settlement forty Jews arrived in Savannah. So illiberal was the policy of the Trustees, that in 1741 the bulk of the Jews left it. Some went to Pennsylvania, others to New York, and four, viz.: Mordecai Sheftall, Levi Sheftall, David de Olivera, and Jacob de Olivera, came to Charles Town. "We do not meet with any of them, however, in the records prior to 1750. There is a local tradition which tells that some time be- tween 1732 and 1739 Moses Cohen, the first Haham, or Chief Eabbi, came to Charles Town, bringing with him from London a settlement of Jews, who afterwards formed the first Congregation Beth Elohim. This tradition can no longer be accepted. The State Paper Office in London has preserved an im- mense number of documents relating to South Carolina. Thirty-six volumes of these documents have been copied 30 ORGANIZATION 31 and are available in Columbia.^ They include the entire data relating to a proposed settlement of Jews in South Carolina in 1748.2 The circumstances of this proposed settlement are in- teresting. The English writer, Picciotto, to whom we are indebted for much of our information concerning Anglo- Jewish history in the eighteenth century, has this to say on the subject: " The questions of labor, of the poor, and of emi^ation, appear to have vexed the minds of the chiefs of the Sephardi community during last century, just as they bewilder at present other important bodies. Notwithstanding the presence of many persons in affluent circumstances among the Jews, the poor unfortunately have always been in greater numbers than the totality of the Hebrew population warranted. A hun- dred years ago the Jews possessed no middle class. There were perhaps 150 to 200 families that might be considered rich, about two-thirds of which belonged to the Spanish and Portuguese congregation. Then we should find at most as many families engaged in small retail trade, and finally we should see a floating mass, at least five times as numerous as the other two classes together, consisting of hucksters, hawkers, journeymen and others, either verging on pauperism or steeped hopelessly in its abyss. " To endeavor to diminish the strain of pauperism by emigration the Sephardi Congregation in 1734 appointed a committee to apply for grants of land in Georgia, which the British Government was freely distributing to intending emigrants under certain conditions. This committee remained standing for some years, but we do not gather that it led to any practical results. Three yeai-s afterwards the committee reported that some lands in Carolina had been offered to them, and that they were negotiating on the subject. In 1745 this committee was still in existence, and obtained an extension of powers and an allowance to cover expenditure. After ^Colonial Records of South Carolina (MSS.) copied from the State Paper Office, London. Secretary of State's Office, Columbia, S. C. 'These documents have been published in full. See Elzas: Documents Relative to a Proposed Settlement of Jews in South Carolina in 1748. (Pamphlet Reprint, Charleston, 1903.) 32 THE JEWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA this time we hear no more of it, and it is fair to assume that had it achieved anything worth recording it would have been recorded." * Picciotto is correct in his surmise. The documents from the State Paper Office, to which reference has just been made, show that a certain John Hamilton, a well-meaning and public-spirited but apparently financially irresponsible promoter, had entered into negotiations with the Committee of the Spanish and Portuguese Jewish community in Lon- don, composed of three of its most prominent members: Solomon Da Costa, Francis Salvador, and Benjamin Mendes Da Costa, with a view of transporting Jews to South Caro- lina and settling them there ; he had petitioned the Lords of the Committee of Council for Plantation Affairs for a grant of 200,000 acres of land in South Carolina, but after appearing several times before the Committee, being un- able to carry out certain conditions, his petition was not granted. Thus his negotiations with the Jews likewise came to nothing. The Jews who came to Charles Town from London in 1750 came, not as a colony, but as individuals. Nor did they belong to the pauper class who were assisted to emi- grate in order to relieve the strain and stress at home. This is in perfect accord with the information that we de- rive from other sources. In 1750, then, several Jews came to Charles Town and we read that in that year the following Jews lived there: Moses Cohen, Isaac Da Costa, Abraham Da Costa, Joseph Tobias, Meshod Tobias, Moses Pimenta, David de Olivera, Mordecai Sheftall, Levy Sheftall, Michael Lazarus, Abra- ham Nunez Cardozo, and Philip Hart.^ This same year 'Picciotto: Sketches of Anglo-Jewish History, pp. 152-153. * The Occident, Vol. 1, p. 337. See also Year Book, City of Charleston, 1883, p. 301. This list of Jewish residents in Charles Town in 1750 is not complete, as the reader will be able to see. ORGANIZATION 33 (1750) saw the first beginnings of the congregational his- tory of K. K. Beth Elohim. The late Nathaniel Levin, who wrote both the sketch in the Year Book and that in TJie Occident, — the two articles are practically identical, — apparently used an old record- book of the Congregation Beth Elohim as the source of his information. The volume is, unfortunately, no longer in existence. It recorded the fact that at the conclusion of the Jewish New Year 5510 (1750) a meeting was called for the purpose of organizing a congregation. Moses Cohen was elected Chief Rabbi; Isaac Da Costa, Reader, and Joseph Tobias, President. The name selected for the Con- gregation, he tells us, was the same which it still bears: ''Kahal Kadosh Beth Elohim" (The Holy Congregation Beth Elohim, or House of God).^ The Congregation was strictly orthodox and its ritual was that of the Spanish and Portuguese communities as practised in London and Am- sterdam.^ ' This is a mistake. There is evidence enough to show that prior to its incorporation in 1791 the name of the Congregation was "Beth Elohim Unveh Shallom." It was probably abbreviated to " Beth Elohim" for convenience of reference. [See Will of Moses Molina (Will Book A, p. 597), who bequeaths "£15 sterling to the Portuguese Jew Congregation of Beth Elohhn Unve Shallom;" Will of Joseph Salvador (Will Book, 1786-1793), who leaves "£100 sterling to the Portuguese Congregation in the City of Charleston, known by the name of Beth Elohim Unveh Shallom, or The House of the Lord and Mansion of Peace." See, finally, The Charleston Evening Gazette of February 3, 1786, which says : " Yes- terday, the Portuguese Jewish Congregation of this City, called 'Beth Elohim Unveh Shallom' or the House of the Lord and Mansion of Peace, proceeded to their burying ground in Hampstead, in order to lay the Foundation Stones of the Wall."] It is just within the bounds of possibility that there were formerly two societies or congregations which afterwards amalgamated. There is no evidence for such a supposition, however, and it is exceedingly im- probable. 'A good account of the early communal history of the Congregation is 34 THE JEWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA The organization of the Congregation Beth Elohim was brought about through the zeal of Moses Cohen. Who Moses Cohen was we do not know. He came from London in 1750 a married man with at least one son.^ In that year, as we have already seen, he was elected the first Chief Rabbi. His full title was ' ' Haham v ' Abh Beth Din " ( Chief Rabbi and Chief of the Beth Din, or Ecclesiastical Court). ^ This was probably nothing more than a high-sounding title in imitation of the old Synagogue of the Spanish and Portu- guese Jews in London, of which the Congregation Beth Elohim is a direct offshoot. Of his activity in this com- munity we know nothing. The early ministers of the Congregation Beth Elohim were not salaried officials and we find them earning their living by trade. Moses Cohen was a shopkeeper.^ The only references to him in the contemporary literature are two advertisements in The South-Carolina Gazette. In the supplement to the Gazette of August 15, 1753, he advertises for "a runaway Dutch servant-girl about 10 years of age and 4 feet 6 inches high, ' ' and on October 21, 1756, his name is mentioned in a published list of unrecorded plats.^*' Moses Cohen, or as he is described on his tombstone, ''The R. R. Moses Cohen, D.D.," died on April 19, 1762. contained in the report of the case of The State vs. Aneker in Richard- son's South Carolina Law Reports, Vol. 2, pp. 245-286. ' See Obituary Notice of Abraham Cohen, of Georgetown, the son of this Moses Cohen : " Died in the 61st year of his age, Abraham Cohen, post- master. Born in London and as early as the year 1762, commenced and carried on commercial business in this place." — The Georgetown Gazette, Saturday, Dec. 13, 1800. " The Occident, Vol. 1, p. 337. * Mesne Conveyance Records, Vol. I 4, p. 241. " Deed of Conveyance from Moses Cohen, of Charles Town, shopkeeper, to Isaac Da Costa, merchant, of the same place." This document is dated 1759. '" The records in Columbia show three grants of land made to him in 1755 and 1759. [Index to Grants, A to K, 1695-1776.] ORGANIZATION 35 His tombstone is still to be seen in the Coming Street ceme- tery in Charleston. This cemetery was then the private burial ground of Isaac Da Costa and was only transferred to the Congregation Beth Elohim in 1764.^^ He was much esteemed by his people and in the Constitution of the Con- gregation Beth Elohim, dated 1820, it is especially enacted that ''on every Kippur night perpetually, the first 'es- caba' [prayer for the dead] shall be made for the Reverend Moses Cohen, deceased, because he was appointed and con- firmed the Reverend Doctor of this Congregation from its first establishment, and as such it is conceived every mark of respect is due to his memory." ^^ The first Hazan, or Reader, of the Congregation Beth Elohim was Isaac Da Costa. He was a member of an illus- trious family that played an important part in English Jewry during the early days after the Resettlement under Cromwell.^ ^ Educated for the ministry, he came to Charles Town from London in 1750. The date of his arrival is confirmed by an entry in the Literary Diary of Ezra Stiles, Volume 1, page 453, under the date August 2, 1774 : " In the Afternoon I was visited by Mr Acosta a Jew Huzzan of the Synagogue in Charleston, So Carolina. He is aet. 52, born in London & educated under Hoehem Rabbi Nieto there till aet. 29. Then he came to America & in 1754 instituted a Synagogue at Charleston."" " For a full history of the old Jewish cemeteries at Charleston, see Elzas: The Old Jewish Cemeteries at Charleston, S. C, Charleston, 1903. " Elzas : Constitution of the Hebrew Congregation of Kaal Kadosh Beth Elohim, or House of God, M,DCCCXX (Reprinted Charleston, 1904), Rule XX. "■ Wolf : Crypto-Jews under the Commonwealth, p. 71. For further information concerning this family, see The Gentleman's Magazine for Jan., 1812, pp. 21-4. This article contains a full genealogy of the Mendes- Da Costa families. See also the Jewish Encyclopcedia, art. Da Costa. " Kohut : Ezra Stiles and the Jews, p. 134. The date 1754 is a manifest error for 1750. 36 THE JEWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA Like his colleague, Moses Cohen, Isaac Da Costa engaged in trade. He seems to have been possessed of considerable means when he came to South Carolina. We meet with him first as a shopkeeper in The South-Carolina Gazette of July 22, 1751. In 1752, he is on Broad Street.^^ In 1753, he advertises as an administrator of an estate.^ ^ In this year we find his name in the records of King Solomon's Lodge, No. 1 — the oldest regularly constituted lodge in South Carolina. In 1756, his name occurs in a list of un- recorded plats.^^ In 1757, he is still on Broad Street, where he advertises "European and Indian goods." ^^ In 1758, he is in partnership with Thomas Farr and the firm is now Da Costa & Farr.^^ In 1759, he advertises as treasurer of Solomon's Lodge.^*^ In 1761, the firm is still Da Costa & Farr. They are extensive ship agents.^^ In 1762, Isaac Da Costa advertises alone — it is no longer Da Costa & Farr.22 jjj 1754^ having some misunderstanding with his Congregation, Isaac Da Costa resigned his position as Eeader.2^ In 1765, he seems to have met with misfortune in business.24 In 1766, he advertises again.^^ In 1772, he is agent for the Spanish transport, ''The Diana. "^^ He is on King Street in 1773.^7 In 1778, he is in partnership with " The South-Carolina Gazette, May 28, 1752. " Ibid., Nov. 26, 1753 " Ibid., Oct. 21, 1756. " Ibid., June 23, 1757. " Ibid., Nov. 17, 1758. ==" Ibid., April 7, 1759. ^ Ibid., Jan. 17, Nov. 28, and Dec. 5, 1761. ='=' Ibid., Oct. 30, 1762. '■^ The Occident, Vol. 1, p. 338. '^ The South-Carolina Gazette, August 3, 1765. =" Ibid., July 14, 1766. ="■ Ibid., April 2, 1772. ^ Ibid., April 19, 1773. ORGANIZATION 37 his son.2^ In 1779, he was elected one of the stewards of the Palmetto Society.^" In 1781, during the period of Brit- ish occupation, his estates were seized and confiscated.^*' Refusing to take British protection, he was banished. From a contemporary diary we learn that he arrived in Phila- delphia on December 31, 1781.^1 On March 17, 1782, he was the chairman of the meeting called for the purpose of raising funds for the erection of a regular Synagogue in Philadelphia.^^ His son was likewise one of the original members of the Mikveh Israel Congregation of that city.^^ In 1783 he returned to Charleston, and in February of that year he established the ''Sublime Grand Lodge of Perfec- tion. "^^ He died on Monday, November 23, 1783, in the sixty-second year of his age.^^ He is buried in the cemetery at Hanover Street that still bears his name. He left no will, but letters of administration to his estate were granted to Mrs. Sarah Da Costa, Joseph Da Costa, and Samuel Da Costa on March 31, 1784.36 We do not know quite as much about Abraham Da Costa. " Gazette of the State of South-Carolina, July 8, 1778. =» Ibid., July 21, 1779. "" Supplement to The Royal Gazette, March 14, 1781. "Diary of Josiah Smith, Jr., one of the exiles from Charles Town to St. Augustine during the British occupation, 1780-1781, vmpublished MSS. {Collections of the South Carolina Historical Society), "List of Heads of families banished, who would not take protection." " Publications of the American Jewish Historical Society, Vol. 1, p. 14. " Morais : Jews of Philadelphia, p. 15. " Mackey : Cryptic Masonry, p. 151. '" " On Monday died, after a few days illness, by the wound of a splinter in his hand, Mr. Isaac Da Costa, Sen., a respectable and valuable citizen." — The Gazette of the State of South-Carolina, November 27, 1783. ■"Probate Records, Administration Book 00, 1775-1783, p. 347. There are numerous descendants of Isaac Da Costa still in South Caro- lina. As is the case with all the old Jewish families, these descendants axe for the most part Christians. 38 THE JEWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA He is mentioned in a most interesting document, a marriage agreement that is reminiscent of mediaeval times. The parties to this agreement are Abraham Da Costa, Rebecca Pimento, and Leah Pimento, her mother : " Abraham Da Costa, with the consent and good liking of the said Leah, covenants, promises and agrees to take Rebecca Pimento to wife accord- ing to the rights and ceremonies of the Jews without portion to be de- manded or required, within the space of three months from the date of these presents" * * * " the said parties binding themselves each to the other in the sum or penalty of £3000 current money of South Carolina." " A copy of the marriage settlement which he made upon his wife is also preserved in the records.^^ He seems to have had a business in Georgetown, for in an advertisement in one of the Gazettes he ''informs his town and country friends that since the late dreadful fire, he is under an obligation to open a store at the upper end of King Street, where he has to sell a great quantity of the goods lately sold at George- town, and some of the remains saved out of the above fire. ' ' ^^ He remained in Charles Town during the period of British occupation. He was then the proprietor of the ''Irish Coffee House" on Broad Street.^^ Jacob Olivera was a merchant of means. His daughter Leah married Joseph Tobias. His name does not appear in the Gazettes, but his will is well worthy of mention as a veritable ethical will of the olden days. This will was made on July 27, 1751, and proved on May 15, 1752. It is witnessed by Solomon Isaacs, and "his good friend Isaac Da Costa" is one of his executors. After a conventional preamble, he writes : Probate Records, Book MM, 1763-1767, p. 222. ' Ibid., Book Miscellaneous, 1767-1771, p. 479. The South-Carolina and American General Gazette, March 26, 1778. ' The Roijal Gazette, May 22, 1782. ORGANIZATION 39 " I commend my soul to the Almighty God of Israel, Creator of Heaven and Earth, imploring His most gracious pardon for all my past sins and transgressions of which I most sincerely repent and hoping His infinite mercies will be extended to me. Also I most vehemently and sincerely invoke His holy name, saying. Hear, Israel, the Lord our God the Lord is One." After making various bequests, among which are " £10 lawfull money of South Carolina to each Jew who should have a hand in washing or burying my body," and £10 to the Portuguese Synagogue at London, with a request for prayers to be said for him, he concludes : " I also recommend to my said son" [David Lopez de OUvera] " to walk in the fear of God and in the path of virtue, which is the last and best legacy I can leave him. I conclude with imploring the Divine Mercy of my Creator to receive my soul with pity on my frail nature, saying, Into Thy hands I will deposit my spirit; Thou hast rescued me, Lord God of Truth." " Such were the Jews who settled in South Carolina in Provincial days. There is an inventory of his estate in the records of the Probate Court.^^ Of David Olivera, who was one of the original Jewish settlers in Savannah, the records make no mention. Abraham Nunez Cardozo, or Abraham Cardozo, as he was more commonly called, advertises only once in the Gazettes.*^ The only other reference to him is the notice of his death : "November 17th, 1762. " This day died, Abraham Cardozo, first cousin to Madam Sarah Da Costa, of a hurt received the 10th instant, in Rebellion-Road, to the great grief of his wife. HANNAH CARDOZO." " " Probate Records, Book Wills, 1747-1752, pp. 522-524. " Ibid., Book Inventories, 1751-3, pp. 409-410. " The South-Carolina Gazette, Jan. 8, 1756. " Ibid., Nov. 20, 1762. 40 THE JEWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA Joseph Tobias has already been referred to at length. Masoad Tobias (pronounced Meshod) was the son of Joseph Tobias. He died on February 27, 1798, aged fifty- seven. He must therefore have been born in Charles Town. Joseph Tobias had a son Jacob, who died in 1773. He had another son Joseph whose son, Jacob Tobias, was a member of Captain Drayton's militia company in 1775.*^ He died on November 16, 1775, aged twenty-six. He could there- fore hardly have seen service in the Revolution. Moses Pimenta, we are told, was ' ' a man learned in the law and a teacher of the Jewish youth." ^^ In the inven- tory of the estate of Solomon Isaacs there is a note of his.*^ Moses Pimenta apparently learnt by experience that teach- ing Jewish youth is by no means an easy road to affluence. Mordecai Sheftall and Levi Sheftall were the sons of Benjamin Sheftall, one of the original Jews who settled in Savannah.^^ They are more closely connected with the history of that community, though they did business and for a while lived in Charles Town. In the Mesne Convey- ance Records there is a marriage settlement, dated 1761, from "Mordecai Sheftall, of the Province of Georgia, to Frances Hart, the daughter of Moses Hart, at present in the Hague in Europe. "^^ Levi Sheftall was more closely identified with Charles Town.^*' Of Michael Lazarus we know very little. He was in busi- ness in King Street in 1762.^^ He was probably the father of Marks Lazarus, the Revolutionary patriot, but this is not certain. ' The South Carolina Hist, and Gen. Mag., Vol, 1, pp. 135 and 187. ' The Occident, Vol. 1, p. 337. Probate Records, Book Inventories, 1756-8, p. 64. ' The Occident, Vol. 1, p. 382. ' Mesne Conveyance Records, Book 3, p. 501. 'Ibid., Book M 5, p. 308 (also Book Z, p. 472). The South-Carolina Gazette, April 24, 1762. ORGANIZATION 41 Philip Hart was a native of Hamburg and one of the officials of the Congregation Beth Elohim.^^ He was also a merchant.^^ He was a partner in the business of Samuel Isaacs, at Georgetown.^* His name is registered in the Columbia Records as part owner of a vessel.^^ He fought in Lushington's militia company in the Eevolution^^ and furnished supplies to the State Commissary.^^ He was a prominent member of the Jewish community and a gen- erous contributor towards the erection of the Synagogue in 1794.^^ He was also a benefactor of the Charleston Orphan House and his name appears on one of the memorial tablets that adorn the walls of that institution. He died on Feb- ruary 1, 1796. Among the bequests in his will are £200 to the Synagogue in Charleston, £50 to the poor in the Poor House, and £50 to the orphans in the Orphan House.^" Another Jew of this period, whom we have met before, was Solomon Isaacs. He advertises in the Gazettes in 1752 and 1755.^"^ He died in 1757. His will, proved January 14, 1757, mentions his nephew, Sampson Simson, of New York, as one of his executors.^^ In The South-Carolina Gazette of August 19, 1756, there occurs the first notice of Moses Lindo, the most conspicuous Jew in South Carolina in Provincial days. To this remark- able man a special chapter will be devoted. " The Occident, Vol. 1, p. 337. " The South-Carolina Gazette, May 30, 1761. " Ibid., Jan. 17, 1761. " Columbia Records, Registered Vessels, etc. '* Orderly Book, Charles Town Regiment of Militia, New York Public Library (Uncalendared MSS.). " Columbia Records, Indent Stubs, Book A, No. 224. "^ The Occident, Vol. 1, p. 387. See also Constitution of 1820, Rule xx. " Will Book C, 1793-1800, p. 270. '"The South-Carolina Gazette, August 17, 1752, April 24, 1755, and Oct. 9, 1755. " Probate Records, Will Book 1757-1760, pp. 8-9. 42 THE JEWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA Joseph Levy is the first Jew whom we meet with in con- nection with military affairs. He was a lieutenant of Cap- tain Gaillard's company of the South Carolina Regiment of Foot, under the command of Lieutenant-Colonel Probart Howarth. There is a copy of his commission, dated Sep- tember 3, 1757, in the Probate Office in Charleston.^^ He also held a commission as lieutenant in Colonel Middleton's South Carolina Regiment in the Cherokee War of 1760-1, and was on recruiting service in North Carolina in 1761.^^ After the war, he went back to business. He advertises in the Gazette of November 13, 1762. His last advertisement appears on August 6, 1772. Though the advertiser does not belong to South Carolina, it would be well to notice here an interesting advertisement which appears in The South-Carolina Gazette of October 20, 1759. Isaac Levy makes claim to the islands of Ossaba and Sappelo on the sea-coast of Georgia, which have been announced for sale, and gives notice to intending purchasers that they will buy lands without a clear title. He is going to petition his Majesty. On November 24 he publishes papers in proof of his own title. This Isaac Levy was a native of New York who lived for some years in England. The full story of this case and its sequel is told in a paper read by Dr. Herbert Friedenwald before the American Jew- ish Historical Society.^^ In the Probate Records, Volume 1758-1763, page 238, there is a document of Israel hevj, merchant, of Charles Town, dated November 29, 1759. In The South-Carolina Gazette of December 16, 1760, Isaac Pinto advertises as a wholesale wine merchant. He "" Probate Records, Book Wills, 1754-8, p. 705. "'^ The South-Carolina Gazette, April 11, 1761. See also Probate Rec- ords, Book 1758-1763, p. 306. This commission is dated Sept. 23, 1760. '^Publications of the American Jewish Historical Society, Vol. 9, pp. 57-62. ORGANIZATION 43 advertises also on February 21, 1761, and on January 23, 1762. In the Gazette of December 11, 1762, we meet with Simon Hart, and on September 25, 1762, Imanuel Cortissoz adver- tises ''Fine fresh Butter, in Keggs, just brought to town," ''at his store in Market-square, facing Broad-Street." In the Gazette of April 24, 1762, we first meet with Joshua Hart "on the Bay." He advertises steadily till April 28, 1777. On November 18, 1777, there is this notice — the first Jewish marriage-notice in the Gazettes: " The same day [Wednesday] Mr. Abraham Mendez Sexias, of the State of Georgia, was married to Miss Ritcey Hart, a young lady of the most amiable qualifications, daughter of Mr. Joshua Hart, of this town," This notice is interesting as an early example of inter- marriage between Portuguese and German Jews. Such intermarriages were by no means uncommon in South Caro- lina in the early days. In later days they are less fre- quent. In the Gazette of September 10, 1763, we meet with Jacob Jacobs. He leaves for Savannah, but is back again on April 7, 1779. On December 31, 1764, Dr. Andrew Judah, a physician from London, advertises. His next advertisement states that he is from Holland. One cannot say with certainty whether he is a Jew. In the Gazette of August 18, 1766, we read: " On Friday, in the ship Queen Charlotte, Capt. Reeves, also from London, arrived (among others) Mr. Mordecai Sheftall (for Georgia) and the Rev. Mr. Alexander." This Rev. Mr. Alexander is most likely the Abraham Alexander who succeeded Isaac Da Costa as Reader of Beth Elohim, though Mr. Levin in The Occident gives the date of his appointment as 1764. We cannot always accept the 44 THE JEWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA statements of this writer, however, who is extremely reck- less in the matter of dates.^^ Abraham Alexander was the son of Joseph Raphael Alex- ander, and came from London. He appears to have come to Charles Town a widower, leaving behind him a young son who came to South Carolina after the Revolution. He afterwards married again. Like his predecessors, he ap- pears to have served as Reader in the Synagogue without remuneration till he resigned in 1784.®^ He earned his living as a scrivener. A manuscript prayer-book according to the ritual of the Spanish and Portuguese Jews in his own hand- writing is still in existence, in the possession of one of his descendants. A document on record in Columbia shows that he made his wife, Ann Sarah Alexander, a sole trader in 1791. He was a clerk in the Charleston Custom House in 1802 and afterwards auditor. He was one of the founders of Scottish Rite Masonry in Charleston.^^ He died in 1816, beloved and respected in the community. In the Probate Records, Volume MM, 1763-7, page 432, there is a deed of Solomon Levi. He mentions in it Bernard De Young and Isaac De Lyon, saddler. On page 579 of this volume there is a promissory note of Henry Isaacks, dated June 18, 1765, and on page 429 there is a deed of Isaac De Lyon, of Charles Town, dated June 11, 1766. In this deed occurs the name of Emanuel Abrahams, who was a prominent member of Lushington's company °° Compare, e.g., the dates given in The Occident with those in the repro- duction of the same article in the Year Booh for 1883. A more extraor- dinary compilation of dates than those given in the Year Book, pp. 315-6, would be hard to imagine. How Mr. Levin could have compiled such a table with his own article before him passes all comprehension. ^ " The seventh eseaba shall be made for Mr, Abraham Alexander, sen., deceased, who volunteered his services to perform divine service." (Con- stitution of 1820, Rule xx.) " Richardson : Centennial Address, p. 8. ORGANIZATION 45 during the Revolution. This Emanuel Abrahams is men- tioned in an earlier document, a deed of settlement made in April, 1763, by Joseph David, who married Dinah Cohen, widow of Moses Cohen, deceased.^^ In the Gazette of October 27, 1766, among the list of pas- sengers arrived are Mr. Franks and daughter. In the postscript to the Gazette of May 11, 1767, we meet with Philip Abraham and Samuel Nunez Cardozo. In the Gazette of June 1, 1767, we read that "On the 26th inst. Mr. Lopez and many other passengers embarked for Rhode Island. ' ' The Lopez family, however, did not settle in Charleston till after the Revolution. In the Gazette of July 6, 1767, we read of the arrival of Mr. Joseph Jacobs from Philadelphia, and in that of August 3 Francis Cohen is mentioned. In the Gazette of August 1, 1771, Mordecai Myers advertises, and again, from Georgetown, on August 25, 1772. On September 19, 1771, we meet with Myer Moses for the first time in the Gazettes, though he had been living in Charles Town for some years. On November 1, 1773, there is mention made of Jacob Ramos, and on December 6, 1773, we read of the arrival of Francis Salvador, the hero and patriot, whose life and death are invested with quite a romantic interest. To this distinguished man a special chapter will be devoted. From now on we meet with many new names. There is nothing to be gained any more by detailed references. It is worth noting, however, that there are not many men who lived in Charles Town before the Revolution whom we do not meet in some or other connection in the records. A complete directory will serve a useful purpose, inasmuch as Probate Records, Book 1758-1763, p. 599. 46 THE JEWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA it will enable us to discuss intelligently the part played in the Revolution by the Jews of South Carolina.^^ ** See Appendix B, The critic may find fault mth the author's method of writing this early history, but no other method was possible consistent with his design of preserving these early memorials of the Jews of South Carolina. Apart from the notices here given, nothing is known of many of the individuals mentioned. The records of this State are in imminent danger of going out of existence at any moment. The old records are going to pieces. A few years from now many of the documents referred to will no longer be legible. Many of them are already crumbling. The ink on the pages of many of the Gazettes is fading. It should be remembered, too, that by far the greater part of this material is unindexed. Even with accu- rate references the investigator may have to spend hours in looking up a single reference, for not a few of the papers have been misplaced by the careless binder. Every reference in this volume has been carefully verified. The author finds consolation in the thought that the real student of history will prefer the dulness of detail of recorded facts to the fascinating narratives invented by family vanity or by professional gene- alogists to meet the requirements of patriotic societies, so called, whose influence upon historical writing has not been one of entirely unmixed good. CHAPTER ///—MOSES LINDO HE subject of this sketch is a most in- teresting figure in the early days of South Carolina's history. Who Moses Lindo was we do not know positively. \r^r<^A Kf.o'V^ What we know of him is mainly con- 6 QJ(j >g^^ ^ tained in that wonderfully rich collec- — ~ I tion of Gazettes that is to be found in the Charleston Library alone. There can be no doubt, how- ever, as to the fact of his being a member of the Lindo family of London, England, which has been prominently connected with the Spanish and Portuguese community of that city for several generations. The present generation of the Lindo family know nothing of him, even tradition- ally, but it is worthy of note that Moses D. Lindo, the grand- father of one of the distinguished Elders of the Bevis Marks Synagogue, of London, who died about 1867, was an indigo broker in Bury Court not far from Wormwood Street, where our Moses Lindo had his office. In the Gentleman^ s Magazine for 1753 there is mention made of a Moses Lindo, merchant, of St. Mary Axe.^ He is probably the Moses Lindo who came shortly afterwards to South Carolina. Picciotto, in his charming Sketches of Anglo-Jewish His- tory,^ makes mention of a Moses Lindo, Jr., as a prominent ^ Gentleman's Magazine, Vol. 23, p. 53. ^ Sketches of Anglo-Jewish History, p, 124. 47 4.8 THE JEWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA member of the "Deputies of British Jews," a body ap- pointed ' ' To watch all Acts of Parliament, Acts of Govern- ment, laws, libels, addresses, or whatever else may affect the body of Jews, ' ' and which is to-day the most influential organization of Jews in the world. He may be a son of our Moses Lindo. The latter was himself an important per- sonage in London prior to his coming to South Carolina. He himself tells us : "I have been allowed to be one of tbe best judges of Cocbineal and Indico on the ROYAL EXCHANGE, for upwards of 25 years past; and have not been thought unworthy (when Sir Stephen Theodore Jansen represented the city of London in Parliament) to be called with Mr. Samuel Torin, and Mr. Daniel Valentine, to give my sentiments of Caro- lina Indico to the hon. House of Commons of Great Britain." ' Suffice it to say, then, that Moses Lindo was an expert indigo sorter in London, who, noticing that a particularly fine grade of indigo was received from South Carolina, changed his headquarters in 1756 from London to Charles Town. The rest of his story cannot be told better than by the Gazettes themselves. We first meet with Moses Lindo in the Gazettes, some three months before he arrives in Charles Town. The fol- lowing is the first notice of him and appears in the supple- ment to The South-Carolina Gazette of Thursday, August 19,1756: " A Correspondent in London, has sent us the following Advertisement, and with it proper Directions for making Lime Water to subside Indico. " To the Printer of the Public Advertiser : "SIR: " I HAVE examined the major Part of the Carolina Indico entered this year, and have the Pleasure to find a considerable Quantity equal to the BEST French; and tho' there is some inferior to the Sight by ^ The South-Carolina Gazette, Jan. 19, 1767. Peter Timothy was the publisher of this Gazette. MOSES LINDO 49 3s. 6d. per Pound, yet on using it as under, I am convinced the In- fe#iority is not more than Is. 6d. a Pound. Therefore, Sir, your pub- lishing this, will be a singular Service to the consumer, and consequently oblige. "Your constant Reader, " MOSES LINDO, Wormwood-street." The next notice of Moses Lindo is the announcement of his arrival in Charles Town. " MOSES LINDO gives this public Notice, that he is arrived from London, with an Intent to purchase Indico of the Growth and Manu- facture of this Province, and to remit the same to his Constituents in London, classed, sorted and packed in a Manner proper for the foreign mai-ket. — If any are desirous to know upon what Credit, and to what Extent he purposes to carry on his Branch of Business, he begs leave to refer them for Particulars to Mr. John Rattray, who is possessed of his Papers, and to whom he is recommended." * The following is the notice of his first shipment : "FOR LONDON " The snow Dodgson, Burthen 130 Tons, with 8 Guns, Men answerable, William Dunn Master, will sail about the 10th of January (Wind and Weather permitting), Mr. Lindo having engaged to ship 20,000 lb of INDICO with all his COFFEE purchased from the French prizes. No other goods to be admitted but Coffee and Indico. Any person inclinable to ship, may apply to Mr. Lindo or the aforesaid Master." ' The magnitude of Lindo 's business transactions may be gathered from the following: "Whereas I have employ'd the Sum of One Hundred and Twenty Thousand Pounds Currency in the Produce of this Country, besides 30,000 Pounds in Prize-Goods and other Articles, all which are paid for, as appears by my Receipt-Book, except about 3,800 Pounds Currency, 2,000 of which does not become due 'till the 22d Instant. The Remaining 1,800 Pounds I have my objections for not paying. * The South-Carolina Gazette, Nov. 11, 1756. ' Ibid., Dec. 23, 1756. 50 THE JEWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA "NOW THIS IS TO GIVE NOTICE, to every Gentleman, Planter and Trader in this Province, who has any Demands on me, that they come and receive their Money from the 15th to the 25th Instant. If any One shoidd take the Liberty of contradicting the above Advertise- ment, or give out any other malicious Insinuation, in order to prejudice me in the Good Opinion of those I have dealt with, I shall esteem it one of the greatest Favours done to me, to let me know the same by a Line, and their Names shall be concealed. And if such Information comes from a person of midling Circumstances, on due Proof thereof, I do hereby promise to reward him with the Sum of Five Hundred Pounds Currency. " I return my Thanks to those Gentlemen who assisted me in taking my Bills for 12,000 Pounds Sterling; and to the Planters of Winyah and those of the Southward, for giving me the Preference of their Indico. And do hereby assure them, that (if it please God I live 'till the next Season) I will not let their Fine Indico Fall under 20 Shillings per Pound, having all the Reason to believe I shall have 200,000 Pounds Currency to lay out the ensuing Year in that Article; wherefore I hope they will not be discouraged. "MOSES LINDO. " Whoever is desirous of being informed what I paid for what I bought, may know of William Branford, John Hutchinson, John Butler, William Gibbs, Jonas Butterfield, Andrew Govan, &e., &e. " N. B. — If any Person is willing to part with a plantation of 500 Acres, with 60 or 70 Negroes, I am ready to purchase it for ready money. Please to leave a Line directed to me at Mrs. Shepard's in Tradd-street, and Secrecy shall be observed if not agreed on." " Moses Lindo was not only an expert indigo sorter, but was also a scientific experimenter with dyes. He sought to encourage investigation, likewise, on the part of others by offering prizes for discoveries if they proved to be of value. Witness the following: " Mr Timothy : " I HAVE made Trial of Two CRIMSON DYES lately discovered in this Province; and in Justice to Mr. John Story of Port Royal, Car- ' Supplement to The South-Carolina Gazette, March 3, 1757. MOSES LINDO 51 penter, I am obliged to declare, that I find his Crimson called JOHN'S- BLOOD, answei-s all the Purposes of Cochineal; for it dyes a fine Crim- son on Cotton, so as to stand washing with Soap-Lees; and it is my firm Opinion will likewise dye Scarlet. I have sent Samples of it Home, via Bristol, that, when approved of in London, by Messrs George Farmer and George Honour, two eminent Dyers there, the said Mr Story may be entitled to Part of the Reward offered by the Society for encouraging Arts, to such as can fix a Scarlet or Turky-Red on Cotton. '' And as there are many Roots and Weeds to be found in this Prov- ince and Georgia, that will dye REDS, I shall be obliged to all who will meet with such in their Way, to send me a Pound dried in the Shade; that I may make Trials of them. And if the Discoverers be persons in middling Circumstances, and what they produce to me be proven a DYE, I will reward them with Fifty Pounds Currency, and use my best En- deavours to obtain for them further Gratuities from the Dyers Company in London. " I am sensible, Mr. Timothy, you are a Well- Wisher to the Interest of this Province and the Mother-Country; therefore, hope you will not omit publishing in your Gazettes any Hints tending to the Advantage of both whenever such are offered you; and thereby, amongst others, oblige " Your Constant Reader, "MOSES LINDO. " Charles Town, July 16, 1759." ' Moses Lindo's contract with the London house which he represented having expired, and their agent having failed to pay for the indigo consigned to them, as also his annual allowance, he next announces that during his stay here he would mark Carolina indigo, first, second, and third sort, as he had done for them, on a reasonable commission. He does not expect to be paid unless the indigo so sorted ''adds credit to this province and profit to those who cliuse to ship that article," so as to prevent impositions by the purchasers of Carolina indigo in England.^ In the next notice he announces that in consequence of ' The South-Carolina Gazette, July 28, 1759. ' Ibid., Nov. 14, 1761. 52 THE JEWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA his advertisement of the 12th of November last, several gentlemen have left their indigo to his care. He assures the public that out of the twenty thousand weight on board of the vessels under convoy there are 18,000 as good as the French. Should it appear at home to the purchasers of it that he has not demonstrated it as such, he says that it will be doing the gentlemen here a piece of service if they will signify his fault in Lloyd's Evening Post, under the attestation of Messrs. Mark Hudson, Peter Fearon, Aaron Lara, and William Richardson, eminent brokers in this and other dyes, ''To whose judgment only I submit, as well as to their equity in doing me justice, whether they ever saw so large a parcel of Carolina indico so even sorted as not to differ in value two pence sterling per pound from the first lot to the last. ' ' Lindo had met with such marked success in his business that he roused the jealousy of his competitors, who seem to have spread false reports concerning him. He retaliates in this same advertisement : " As some purchasers of indico may imagine that by this advertise- ment I want to get more indico to sort, I do hereby declare that I will only do it for those that I am engaged with, they being well known to be capital people, and capable of purchasing as much indico of the planters as I can well attend to." He indignantly denies that he owes more than 3,000 guineas in this province than is due to him at home, ''as some people have through their correspondence insinuated to my friends and relatives. ' ' The advertisement ends with a humorous touch of scorn: " Sealed with my seal, well known in most markets in Europe for these 25 years, as always prime indico, which to this time of life I have not yet forfeited; and it is to me really a diversion to see some people in this town pretend to be judges of the quality of indico, to one that has had the experience of upwards of thirty years in it; and I wish they MOSES LINDO 53 may not, by which they have shipped on board the fleet, experience the presumption." * The importance of the indigo industry to the Province of South Carolina may be appreciated from the following his- torical facts : Indigo began to be cultivated in South Caro- lina in 1744 and was exported to England as early as 1747, where it attracted considerable attention. Great Britain was consuming annually 600,000 pounds weight of French indigo, paying for it 150,000 pounds sterling, and the sta- tistics showed an annual increase of consumption. In 1748 Parliament passed an Act, allowing a bounty of six pence per pound on indigo from the British Colonies. This stimu- lated the South Carolina production and in 1754 the export of indigo from Charles Town amounted to 216,924 pounds, and shortly before the Revolution had risen to 1,176,660 pounds. ^° The man who had done more to encourage this important industry — after rice, the greatest source of revenue in those days to South Carolina — than anyone in the Province was Moses Lindo. This is clearly evident from the following: " The services heretofore rendered to this province by Mr. Moses Lindo, in ascertaining the quality and establishing the reputation of our indico- manufacture, both at home and at the foreign markets, in April last induced many gentlemen of rank and fortune, merchants, planters and others, to give him the following testimonial of their opinion of his abilities, in writing, and of the necessity of having a public inspector, subscribed with their names, viz : " ' In order to bring our indico-produce into reputation at home as well as at foreign markets, it becomes necessary to have a proper person qualified to ascertain the value of our First Sort. We merchants, plant- ers, principal traders and others, do, therefore, hereby certify under our hands, that Mr. Moses Lindo, of Charles Town, merchant, is the only The South-Carolina Gazette, Feb. 27, 1762. Year Book, City of Charleston, 1883, pp. 402-403. 54 THE JEWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA person known to us, capable of rendering this province further service in that article, if he is wilUng to undertake ascertaining the same and to grant his certificate for the First Sort.' " This testimonial was signed by the Hon. William Bull, Lieutenant-Governor, five members of his Majesty's Coun- cil, the Speaker and nineteen members of the late Commons House of Assembly, forty-one merchants and seven ''con- siderable planters of, or dealers in indico. ' ' Because of the local interest attaching to the names appended to this testi- monial, the list is here quoted in full : " *Hon William Bull, Esq, Lieutenant-Governor; the Hon Othniel Beale, Esq, *Henry Middleton, John Guerard, *John Drayton and *Daniel Blake, Esqrs, members of his Majesty's Council. " Benjamin Smith, Esq, Speaker, and * Thomas Middleton, *William Moultrie, *Peter Manigault, William Scott, * Thomas Bee, * William Blake, William Roper, *Robert Pringle, *Thomas Lynch, *Rawlins Lowndes, *Benjamin Dart, George Roupell, *John Ainslie, *Thomas Ferguson, *John Parker, James Parsons, *William Maxwell, *Doct. John Mur- ray and *Sir John Colleton, members of the late Commons House of Assembly. " Messrs John Chapman, John Torrans, John Greg, John Poaug, * John Smith, Thomas Listen, *Paul Douxsaint, *Miles Brewton, Henry Peron- neau, Thomas Corker, John Lloyd, Arthur Peronneau, William Anerum, Lambert Lance, *Richard Downes, John Benfield, Henry Laurens, George Appleby, John Logan, Martin Campbell, John Neufville, Edward Neuf- ville, Thomas Ellis, John Scott, Thomas Farr, jun, James Poyas, Evan Jones, *John M'Queen, William Guerin, John Pamham, Robert Smyth, Peter Bacot, James Laurens, George Anerum, Thomas Shirley, George Inglis, Robert Rowand, John Nowell, Samuel Peronneau, Peter Mazyck and Thomas Moultrie, merchants. "Andrew Johnston, John Moultrie, jun, William Gibbes, Job Milner, Alexander Eraser, John Mayrant, William Brandford, considerable planters of, or dealers in indico. " (Note — The gentlemen with the mark * prefixed to their names are likewise considerable planters of indico.) " In consequence of the above testimonial and an appKcation to the Governor, his Excellency, on Tuesday last, was pleased to order the following commission to be issued, viz: MOSES LINDO 55 "'SOUTH CAROLINA: "'By his Excellency THOMAS BOONE, Esquire, Captain General, and Governor in Chief, in and over the said Province. "'TO MOSES LINDO, GENTLEMAN: " ' WHEREAS, several of the most considerable inhabitants of the said province, as well planters as merchants, have by a writing signed by them, certified, that, in order to bring the indico produce into reputa- tion at home and at foreign markets, it is become necessary to have a proper person qualified to ascertain the First Sort; and that the said Moses Lindo is the only person known to them capable of rendering the province further service in that article, if he is willing to undertake ascertaining the same, and grant his certificate of its being the First Sort. And, whereas, the said Moses Lindo, in order to give such his certificates the more weight and authority in Great-Britain, has made application to me, that he may be appointed Surveyor and Inspector- General of Indico in the province aforesaid. I, therefore, in considera- tion of the premises, and being convinced of the fitness and ability of the said Moses Lindo for discharging the said office, do hereby nominate, constitute and appoint you the said Moses Lindo to be Surveyor and Inspector-General of the Indico made in the said province, for the ends and purposes above mentioned. " ' This commission to continue during pleasure. " ' Given under my Hand and Seal at Charles Town, this 21st day of September, Anno Dom. 1762, and in the second year of his Majesty's ^^^^' " ' THOMAS BOONE. " * By his Excellency's command. ,, , ^ .. „ •^ '' " * George Johnston for " ' John Murray, Dep Sec' " " The next notice in the Gazette is an announcement of Moses Lindo oflEicially as Surveyor and Inspector-General of Indico. It is as follows : "MOSES LINDO. " Surveyor and Inspector-General of INDICO made in South Carolina, " GIVES THE FOLLOWING NOTICES : " That as there is at present no obligation on any merchants or planters to submit their Indico to his inspection, or on him to take that trouble for The South-Carolina Gazette, Sept. 25, 1762. 56 THE JEWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA nothing, he will be ready and willing, after the 16th instant, to inspect any parcel for either, ascertain the FIRST SORT, and give his certificate therefor for the small consideration of ONE per cent on the value of the Indico so certified. " That he will make no distinction of persons in inspecting and giving certificates, in regard to the quantity, but will with equal readiness serve a planter who brings only 50 lb to market, as him who may bring thou- sands. " That where any differences arise, on allowances to be made for bad mixtures, the accidental dampness, or designed wetness of Indico to dis- guise the quality, he will expect TWO per cent for his decision and ascer- taining the value; i.e., ONE per cent from the seller, and as much from the buyer. " That all orders gentlemen intend to favour him with, to purchase Indico on their accounts for exportation, must be delivered to him, or left at Messrs Inglis, Lloyd & Hall's, on or before the 16th instant; after which he will receive no more till those then in his hands are compleated. " And, that no planter or other person may complain that he means to injure them (which is far from his intention) he declares, that he will not buy any parcel, till they have tried the market eight or ten days; when he will purchase, on orders upon some of the principal houses in town, at three months' credit. " N. B. — He begs pardon for having omitted among the subscribers to the testimonial or certificate, in consequence of which he obtained his commission from the Governor, to give the printer the following gentle- men's names :" * * * " A few days later Moses Lindo announces : " That he has opened an office on Mr. Beresford's wharf, where con- stant attendance will be given eveiy day in the week. (Saturdays, Sun- days and holidays observed at other offices, excepted,) from 8 o'clock in the morning till 1 in the afternoon, in order to survey, inspect and grant certificates for all parcels of indico that shall be brought to him for that purpose, of the FIRST SORT. " That he will not give his certificate for any indico, unless the planter produces a proper certificate of its being the growth of his plantation. " That for declaring the first sort, and granting his certificate thereof, he expects to be paid at the rate of twenty shillings currency, for every ' The South-Carolina Gazette, Oct. 9, 1762. MOSES LINDO 57 hundred pounds weight of indico mentioned in such certificates, and the like sum for settling any difference between buyer and seller, on every hundred pounds weight. " That if any planter, in eight days after obtaining his certificate for the first sort, desires him to procure a purchaser for the same, he in that case expects to be paid 5 per cent commission, if such indico is not in any merchant or factor's hands; but if in a merchant or factor's hands, then only 20s. per cent. " That he will not sort, garble, and seal the first, second and third Sorts of indico of the present crop for exportation, but for the follow- ing gentlemen, who favoured him with their orders for that purpose before the 16th instant, or by orders obtained from them; for which his charge will be 3 per cent, casks and all other expences included. " That all his fees must be paid him before the delivery of his certifi- cates. " That he will not accept, or undertake to execute any orders from Europe or from any of his correspondents elsewhere, to purchase indico for them this crop. And, " That if any unfair dealings should be discovered, by fraudulent mixtures, after he has given his certificate for any parcels of indico, he is determined to expose such intended imposition. " That after the first day of Februaiy next, he will not act in this or any other capacity, in purchasing or declaring the qualities of indico, until some regulation is made by Act of Parliament to encourage the planting and manufacturing that valuable dye." * * * " The following will give an idea of the prices received for South Carolina indigo of the first sort : "MOSES LINDO, Inspector and Surveyor-General of South Carolina INDICO. Having granted certificates for the FIRST SORT, sold at the prices opposite to the names of the respective makers (which he declares to be equal in quality to the best French that has been taken during the last or present war) viz: 8. d, " His Honor the Lieut. Governor's, sold at 27 6 per lb George Saxby, Esq 40 per lb John Moultrie, jun. Esq 40 per lb Sir John Colleton, Bart 30 per lb " The South-Carolina Gazette, Oct. 23, 1762. 58 THE JEWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA 3. d. Mr. Edmund Bellinger 30 per lb Alexander Fraser, Esq 26 and 40 per lb Mr. Charles Elliott 23 per lb David Deas, Esq 27 6 per lb Mr. George Marshal 24 per lb John Pamor, Esq 27 per lb George Seaman, Esq 26 per lb Mrs. Mary M. Daniel 23 per lb Mr. William Campbell 21 per lb Mr. William Pearson 25 per lb Mr. Philip Porcher 27 6 per lb Mr. James Laroach 22 6 per lb Mr. James Commander 25 per lb Mr. William Johnson 27 6 per lb "Part of which is now on board the Boscawen, capt. David Jenkins, commander, bound for London. " IN THIS PUBLIC MANNER " Requests, that the commissioners of his Majesty's customs in London, will desire 15 or 16 gentlemen, merchants, salters and brokers, conversant in this trade, to inspect the said indico when landed, and declare their sentiments thereon in all the public papers. " And, whereas, several other parcels of indico have been shipped on board the said frigate, by divers persons, in like packages, which have not been inspected or surveyed by him, he has, therefore, thought proper to give a certificate for every cask that has undergone his inspection, and been sealed by him, specifying in the margin the kind, weight and tare, and registered the same in his office; which certificates Mr. WilUam Richardson, broker in London (one of the best judges of indico now left in England) will take care to cancel after inspection. This precau- tion is so essentially necessary for the interest of a colony where any manufactures are produced, that in England the law has made it felony punishable with death, to counterfeit, imitate or alter any public inspec- tor's mark." " In his next notice Mr. Lindo refers to his last big ship- ment : The South-Carolina Gazette, Jan. 15, 1763. MOSES LINDO 59 " When the last 55 hogsheads arrive in England, I flatter myself the world will be satisfied of my integrity of heart and the uprightness of my intentions; as well as be convinced, that I have devoted myself to the service of my native country, and equally so to this province; for, if the indico that has undergone my inspection, and obtained my certifi- cates, shall be proved equal in quality to the best French (which I am confident it will) in that case £12,000 sterling per annum bounty will be saved to the Government; and the planter here always sure of getting 25s currency a pound for the First Sort, and in proportion for the Second and Third, which will be suflScient to encourage them to go on in the planting and manufacturing that valuable dye." * » * It would thus seem as if Moses Lindo had been meeting with considerable criticism and opposition. He ends his long letter: " Your publishing this letter may prevent some evil-minded persons continuing to insinuate, that, sensible of my superior knowledge and ex- perience in all dyes and drugs to any in Europe or America, I only take the advantage of exposing the ignorance of some pretenders to the like, which is not my intention. I must, however, say that no person whatever, that has not been ten or twelve years constantly employed as a broker of indico, can be a competent judge of that article, or the true value of each quality; therefore, an error in judgment after that time must be deemed a crime, not an oversight." " In his next notice he announces, among other things, that he will not purchase any indigo himself, in less than three or four days after it has been surveyed ;. when, if no better price can be obtained for it than his valuation, he will re- ceive it at that, and pay for the same as he has hitherto done.^® On September 2, 1763, he writes the following letter to Mr. Emanuel Mendez da Costa, the librarian of the Royal Society of London. This letter was communicated to the " The South-Carolina Gazette, March 26, 1763. " Ibid., Oct. 22, 1763. 60 THE JEWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA Society on November 10, 1763, and is incorporated in the Philosophical Transactions for 1763.^'^ " In August 1757, I observed the mocking bird fond of a berry, which grows on a weed called Pouck, represented to me as of a poisonous quality ; the juice of this berry being a blooming crimson. I was several times inclined to try, if I could extract a die from it; yet the very thoughts of its quality prevented me from proceeding, till observing these birds to void their excrement of the same colour as the berry, on the Chinese rails in my garden, convinced me it was not of the quality represented. I therefore made a tryal in the following manner. " 1st I ordered one of my negroes to gather me a pint of those berries, from which I extracted almost three quarters of a pint of juice, and boiled it with a pint of Bristol water, one quarter of an hour. " 2dly. I then took two pieces of flannel and numbered them 1 and 2, boUed them in a separate tin pot with alum a quarter of an hour, and rinced them in cold water. " 3dly. I then dipped the piece of flannel No. 1 into the pot, where the juice was, and left it to simmer five minutes, then took it out, and rinced it in cold water; when, to my surprize, I found a superior crimson dye fixed on the flannel than the juice of the berry. " 4thly. I then dipped the piece of flannel No. 2 in the same juice, and being desirous to clean my hands from the stain, which No. 1 had caused, I ordered some lime water to be brought me, such as we use to settle our indico, and found the colour of the stain change to a bright yellow. This unexpected change urged me to throw a wine glass-full of lime water into the pot, where the piece of flannel No. 2 was simmering; on which all the juice, as well as the flannel, became of a bright yellow, by which I find alum fixed the crimson, and lime the yellow. " 5thly. Having then put a quart of fresh juice in 2 pint decanters, in one of which I piit a small quantity of powdered alum, I laid them up; about six weeks after, I then examined them, and found the juice in the decanter, which had no alum, was turned black, and the other retained its colour." ^° " An Account of a new Die from the Berries of a "Weed in South Caro- lina: In a letter from Mr. Moses Lindo, dated at Charles Town, Septem- ber 2, 1763, to Mr. Emanuel Mendez da Costa, Librarian of the Royal Society. Philosophical Transactions, Vol. 53, pp. 238-239. " Dr. Kayserling, in Frankel-Graetz's Monatsschrift fUr Geschichte und Wissenschaft des Judenthums, Vol. 8, p. 165, refers to Lindo as a MOSES LINDO 61 We continue to meet with Moses Lindo in the Gazettes for some years longer. Several of the advertisements are of no particular interest, others are extremely interesting. For the sake of completeness, we note here all the refer- ences to him in chronological order. He advertises on October 8, 1764. In his advertisement of May 4, 1765, he refers to "the iniquitous practices which have been com- mitted with Carolina Indico," and which he declares he will never countenance. In June, 1765, there is an interesting reference to him in a contemporary diary.^^ Here is the entry: "Monday, 3. Dined this day with Mr. Thomas Ldston, a reputable mereht bom here: is a man of great opeuess & politeness, of generous sentiments & very genteel behaviour: passed the afternoon veiy agi-eably in his sumer house with him & Mr. Lindo, a noted Jew, inspector of Indigo here." The next item is very amusing. It occurs in the Gazette of July 28, 1766. Moses Lindo, in his investigation into the properties of "roots and weeds," makes a valuable medical discovery, and, while not, as far as we know, a member of the medical profession, he is public-spirited enough not to rich farmer who owned many negroes. There is nothing to show that Lindo planted at all. From what we know of his life, this is most un- likely. The Columbia records show two grants of land to him but in the upper part of the State, remote from Charleston. The records Likewise show that he purchased a negro man on two occasions. These were prob- ably merely his personal servants. The Jewish Encyclopcedia likewise represents Lindo as a wealthy planter and slave-owner." If we are to believe Lindo himself, he was not wealthy and as we have just stated, he was not a planter. In his paper, read before the American Jewish His- torical Society, Mr. Hiihner tells us that Moses Lindo " was in the army and held an important post"! (See The American Hebrew, Dec. 29, 1899.) " Journal of a voyage to Charlestown in So. Carolina hy Pelatiah Web- ster in 1765. (Charleston, S. C, 1898.) 62 THE JEWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA desire to retain the boon for himself, so he writes this letter to the Gazette: "MR. TIMOTHY: " HAVING lately made a valuable discovery, the CURE of that grievous and common disease among the Negroes, called the YAWS." * * * « i beg leave to make use of the channel of your paper to make the Recipe public for the good of mankind, without the least view to my private advantage; and to request that such gentlemen whose negroes have been, or may be cured, will make the same publickly known, so as to be com- municated to his Majesty's other American dominions. I am yours, &e. " MOSES LINDO, ' " Inspector-General of Indico." The recipe is interesting, as a fair sample of the thera- peutics of the eighteenth century : " RECIPE TO CURE THE YAWS, &c. " To a pound of Poke root, add three ounces of Tobacco, and an ounce of Roman Vitriol, boil the same in five quarts of water, till reduced to a gallon, and strain it. With this, wash the infected part three times a day. A pint is sufficient for ten or twelve days. " At the same time use a diet drink, made of Two pounds of Lignum Vitae shavings, four ounces of the bark of Sassafras root, four ounces of Anniseeds, and half a pound of brown sugar, boiled in four gallons of water till reduced to three. The patient to take a pint a day, mixed with three pints of water for twenty-one days." Moses Lindo advertises again on November 10, 1766, and on January 19, 1767, he writes a long letter to Mr. Timothy on the present status of Carolina indigo abroad : " I have lately observed with concern, in an account of a public sale of 12 casks of French, and 23 of Carolina Indico on the 28th of August last" * * * "that all the French sold at 4s 5d to 5s 5d per lb, while only one cask of the Carolina allowed to be fully as good as the best French, obtained no more than 3s 8d, and all the rest sold amazingly low." He attributes the difference to a combination at home among the importers of foreign indigo, to discourage its cultivation in his Majesty's Colonies. He *^ publickly MOSES LINDO 68 avers" that the Carolina indigo, which he distinguishes as first sort, properly prepared by the dyer, will yield a superior dye to the very best French. He ought to know more certainly than the generality of people by reason of his long experience and expert knowledge. Lindo was a man of resources and a true protectionist. He suggests, that as there exists a prejudice of 25 per cent against Carolina indigo brought about by the combination, that the British Parliament, instead of continuing the pres- ent bounty, should lay Is. a pound duty on all the French, exported from Britain and which would save no less than £12,000 per annum to the Government, and at the same time give suflBcient encouragement to cultivate 1,500,000 pounds in his Majesty's Colonies, for the use of British manufactories. As Inspector-General of Indico in this Province (though without a salary) he thinks it his duty ''to rescue that valuable branch of our staples from the malign influence of designing men" as far as it lies in his power. In the Gazette of October 10, 1771, Moses Lindo has a lengthy communication in defence of the custom of packing Carolina indigo in the Spanish shape. ''Judges," he says, "never buy from outward appearance; they will examine its inward Quality. Therefore, there can be no Fraud in the Imitation. ' ' He quotes in defence of his contention the custom of mercers who, in order to get off their fine silks, are often obliged to call them French, though wholly wove in Spitalfields. He makes several observations on Carolina, Florida, and Guatemala indigo and ends by the statement that he has the interest of this country ' ' as disinterestedly as much at heart" as any native, and is resolved to spend the remainder of his days here, where merit will meet with its reward, without partiality, from the highest to the low- est of its inhabitants. In the Gazette of July 23, 1772, he advertises that it 64 THE JEWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA would afford him great satisfaction, if three or four per- sons, well experienced in the indigo business, would under- take the sorting and garbling of indigo for exportation, by which means that valuable produce might recover its repu- tation both at home and at foreign markets. His own ser- vices are only at the disposal of his regular patrons, whose names are appended. On August 6, 1772, there is an announcement that ''Moses Lindo, Esq., has resigned the place of Inspector- General of Indico for this Province." On August 20, 1772, Lindo publishes a letter to Henry Laurens, Esq., containing his reasons for refusing to act any longer as Inspector-General of Indico. He would not seal certain classes of indigo ''and bring disgrace on the Seal with a Crown over G. R." He would still continue, however, to serve his friends, if his knowledge could be of any use to them. On November 12, 1772, he advertises again vindicating the action he has taken. The next item is a most interesting one and deserves to be investigated further, if only as a matter of curiosity, by some English-Jewish antiquarian. It occurs in the Gazette of March 15, 1773 : " Moses Lindo, Esq., his Majesty's Inspector General of Indico, having, about eight years ago, accidentally met with, and for a Trifle purchased, a Stone (among others) found in this Province, which he judged to be a WATER SAPPHIRE or TOPAZ, and then declared to be too valuable a jewel to be possessed by any other than the Queen of England, making a Vow, that it should be sent to her Majesty; we hear, has accordingly sent the same, in the Eagle Packet-Boat, by the Hands of the Right Hon. Lord Charles-Greville Montagi;, to be presented to her Majesty. The size and shape of this Stone is like Half a Hen's Egg, and the Weight 526 Carats." On July 13, 1773, Moses Lindo gives a testimonial of char- acter to Jonas Phillips, of New York, who, it would seem. MOSES LINDO 65 had become involved in some charge reflecting on his in- tegrity. The original is still extant.^° This interesting docmnent recites that Moses Lindo had "arrived in this Province in the Month of November, 1756, in the good vessel called the Charming Nancy, Commanded by Captain Wil- liam White, that some Three months before he left London he engaged in his Service to come with him to this Province one Mr. Jonas Phillips, that after their arrival together in the same Vessel here, the said Jonas Phillips lived with him some months and that the said Jonas Phillips was in his employ and that he did behave and deport himself faith- fully and honestly. ' ' He expresses his belief that ' ' the said Jonas is trustworthy even to Gold untold." This affidavit was accompanied by a letter in similar terms from Joshua Hart, of Charles Town, in whose house Phillips had like- wise stayed. On September 6, 1773, he publishes a lengthy letter to Mr. John Ledyard, of Melksham, in Wiltshire, pointing out many fallacies in the statements made abroad concerning Carolina indigo and showing him how he may prove his own statements by actual experiment, the materials for which he is sending him. This letter is a splendid illustra- tion of Lindo 's patriotic feeling and of his untiring efforts in behalf of the Province. On November 22, 1773, he makes a statement of the fight he is making against the combination in London against Carolina indigo. He recites what he has done to promote the welfare of the Province and refers to a recommendation that is to be made to the General Assembly to allow him a yearly salary besides fees. He has not become wealthy as the result of his work : ' ' Should any accident befall me thro ' the infirmities of age or otherwise, I am persuaded it '^Publications of the American Jewish Historical Society, Vol. 2, pp. 51-55. 66 THE JEWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA is not difficult for you, or any of my friends to conceive how very wretched a being would be Yours, &c, "Moses Lindo." He still signs himself Inspector-General of Indico, and on December 27, 1773, there is a notice that ''13,000 pounds weight of indigo, belonging to two planters, were last week sold by Mr. Samuel Prioleau, jun., at a dollar a pound to Moses Lindo, Esq., Inspector-General, who has declared that the whole quantity is equal if not superior to any French that, in the many years ' experience he has had, has gone through his hands, or fallen under his observation." Moses Lindo died in 1774. The South-Carolina Gazette, in which he had advertised so extensively for so many years, makes no mention of his death, but in The South- Carolina Gazette; And Country Journal of Tuesday, April 26, 1774, we read: "DIED, Moses Liiido, Esq; for many years Inspector-General of In- dico in this Town." There is but one notice more and that in The South-Caro- lina Gazette of May 23, 1774: "Moses Lindo, Inspector-General of Indico, having departed this life, his estate and effects, consisting of Household Furniture, a Variety of Plate, Books, a Gold Watch, Chain and Seals, and other Articles, will be sold at public outcry on Saturday the 11th of June next, about Ten o'clock in the forenoon at the back stores of Messrs. Martin Campbell & Son; on the Bay" * * * " May 17th. 1774." We have thus kept track of the subject of our sketch from the time he landed in South Carolina till his death. Moses Lindo left no will. The inventory of his estate, dated May 17, 1774, and appraised at £1,199.17.8, is recorded in the MOSES LINDO 67 Probate Office in Charleston.^i It has been a source of much gratification to perpetuate the memory of this public- spirited and patriotic Jew, who was a resident of Charles Town from 1756 to 1774. He is but one example of many of his faith who have contributed in no small way to the upbuilding of this great country. Probate Records, Book V (1772), p. 591. CHAPTER /F— FRANCIS SALVADOR "More than one hundred passengers are come, in the vessels that have arrived here since our last." * HE ''last" number of Tl%e South-Caro- lina Gazette, prior to the one contain- ing the above announcement, was dated November 29, 1773. Following the statement is a list of some of the pas- sengers, and on the list appears the name of Francis Salvador. He was a young English Jew, who had come to settle in the Province and who was destined within the brief space of not quite three years' residence therein to engrave his name j&rmly upon the pages of the history of South Carolina. But be- fore proceeding to tell how he accomplished this, it is neces- sary to give some account of the antecedents of this re- markable young man. His grandfather, Francis Salvador, was a son of Joseph Salvador, a Portuguese-Jewish merchant, of Amsterdam. Though the family was known to the commercial world by the name of Salvador, the name which this family had orig- inally borne in Portugal was that of Jessurun, or Isurune, Eodrigues. After the death of Joseph Jessurun Rodrigues, or Salvador, his son removed to England, where he was ^ The South-Carolina Gazette, Dec. 6, 1773. 68 the salvador granti heralds' COLL^, Original in the possession h ton. Irreparably damaged b ■; Carolina Inter-State and W 1902, after the photo was tal was made Ll| AND SINGULAli ;/ i?acb /'^/'/ At^A /Y^rf ' , ^ ^ /A' /f^ //ir/jyy/;( ' '/■iA,/'/A • V ^ v/zwa/mtyidjiM^/f/. (/jit^e(0f Ill .']u\i ! Itnvti't ili' Lv > Or n\ rr ik- 1 ,\^ <*• ^' /• . '' ' y *' i ! ARMS FROM THE J, LONDON lie College of Charles- 'ater during the South ' Indian Kxposition In ifrom which this plati- FRANCIS SALVADOR 69 enfrancliised and made a free denizen by letters patent dated at Westminster, April 24, 1719. The father and son were both men of prominence and used a eoat-of-arms, but after coming to England the son found that under the laws of heraldry observed in England he could not show a valid title to these arms. He therefore applied, in 1744, to Thomas, Earl of Effingham, Deputy to Edward, Duke of Norfolk, Earl Marshal and Hereditary Marshal of Eng- land, to have the arms confirmed unto him, his descendants, and all descendants of his father, Joseph Salvador. The application was approved by his Lordship, who issued a warrant to the Garter and Clarenceux Kings of Arms on March 19, 1744, and the arms were properly confirmed by a grant made by these officials on June 1, 1745.^ The grantee of these arms, Francis Salvador, and his sons, Jacob and Joseph, were for many years wealthy mer- chants of London and were conspicuously identified with the ancient Spanish and Portuguese Jewish Congregation of that city. It is worthy of note that in the records of the Sjmagogue the old family name — Jessurun Rodrigues — is retained as late as 1764.^ The subject of this sketch was the son of Jacob Salvador, who died when his son Francis was about two years old. Shortly after Jacob's death his widow gave birth to another son, Moses. The two sons were liberally educated by a pri- vate tutor and the best masters, and were taught the accom- ' This original grant was subsequently brought to South Carolina by a member of the Salvador family and is now preserved in the library of the College of Charleston. This beautiful specimen of heraldic art is now unfortunately ruined, having sustained irreparable damage from water through the carelessness of its- custodians during the South Carolina Inter-State and West Indian Exposition in 1902. For a transcript of this document see Appendix C. 'Picciotto: Sketches of Anglo- Jewish History, pp. 161-164. Gaster: History of the Antient Synagogue, Bevis Marks — A Memorial Volume. 70 THE JEWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA plishments suitable to their wealth and rank. Upon coming of age, each of them inherited £60,000 sterling. Francis, after spending some time in France, returned to England and married his first cousin, Sarah, second daughter of Joseph Salvador, received with her a marriage portion of £13,000, and resided at Twickenham, near his mother, who had married Abraham Prado. Moses Salvador lived for many years in the Hague.* Unfortunate investments having reduced his fortune, and the earthquake in Lisbon and the failure of the Dutch East India Company having impaired that of Joseph Salvador, his father-in-law and uncle, Francis Salvador determined to settle in South Carolina, where Joseph Salvador owned a hundred thousand acres of land in Ninety Six District, which he had purchased from John Hamilton, of Charles Town, South Carolina, in 1755, for £2,000 sterling.^ In 1769 Joseph Salvador executed a power of attorney to Richard Andrews Rapley, who was about to depart for South Carolina, to sell a part of this land for him. In October, 1773, Rapley sold two tracts of it, containing 1,062 and 1,638 acres respectively, to Abraham Prado, stepfather of Francis Salvador. On the sixth day of the same month Joseph Salvador sent to Rapley a special power of attor- ney, by which Rapley, on May 17, 1774, in consideration of £1,611 currency, conveyed to '^ Francis Salvador, late of Twickenham in the County of Middlesex but now of the Province aforesaid Esqr," 921 acres of the one hundred thousand acre tract. Again, on May 31, 1774, by the same special power of attorney, Rapley conveyed to Francis Sal- vador, by way of mortgage, ' 'in consideration of seven thou- sand Lawfull money of the said Province" which Joseph Salvador owed him, 5,165 acres more of this land, so that * Drayton : Memoirs of the American Revolution, Vol. 2, pp. 347-349. ^ Mesne Conveyance Records, Book F 3, p. 133. FRANCIS SALVADOR 71 by collecting a debt and by direct purchase the accomplished young gentleman, who had come to cast his lot in a new and almost unbroken section, was now the possessor of a planta- tion of nearly seven thousand acres. Drayton tells us that he purchased slaves and began the life of a planter, living with his friend, Rapley, at Coronaca, in Ninety Six District.® His education and polished manners soon won for him a prominent position in his District and in the Province. He sjnnpathized with the popular movement in South Carolina against British oppression, and at the election held on Mon- day, December 19, 1774, for deputies to the First Provincial Congress of South Carolina, he was returned as one of the ten deputies from Ninety Six District — his friend, Rapley, being another J The first session of the Provincial Congress convened in Charles Town on Wednesday morning, January 11, 1775, and continued in session until Tuesday evening, January 17th.^ Salvador was in attendance and his fine abilities were soon recognized, and when on Sunday, the 15th, an election was held for members for the several elec- tion districts on the Committee for Effectually Carrying into Execution the Continental Association and for Re- ceiving and Determining upon Applications Relative to Law Processes, he was chosen one of the committee for Ninety Six District.^ He also attended the second session of the Congress in June, 1775, and was again conspicuous in its work. At the election held on Monday and Tuesday, 'Drayton: Memoirs of the American Revolution, Vol. 2, p. 348. In the supplement to The South-Carolina and American General Gazette for Sept. 9, 1774, he advertised for an indigo overseer to live near Ninety Six and look after about thirty slaves. ' The South-Carolina Gazette, Dec. 26, 1774. '^ The South-Carolina and American General Gazette, Jan. 13, 1775; The South-Carolina Gazette, Jan. 23, 1775; Moultrie: Memoirs of the American Revolution, Vol. 1, pp. 14-18. * The South-Carolina Gazette, Jan. 30, 1775. 72 THE JEWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA August 7 and 8, 1775, he was returned as a Deputy from Ninety Six District to the Second Provincial Congress,^*^ taking his seat when the Congress convened on Wednesday, November 1, 1775, and was, as in the previous Congress, placed upon important committees and conspicuous in de- bate. At the second session of the Second Provincial Con- gress, held in February and March, 1776, Salvador was again conspicuous in committee work and in debate. On February 6th he was placed upon a special committee to inquire into the state of the interior parts of the Province lately in commotion; to consider what measures to pursue to preserve the peace, secure safety, and prevent future commotions in that quarter, and to consider the cases of the state prisoners and report what measures should be pur- sued in relation thereto.^ ^ On February 13tli he was named as one of a special committee of three to extract such parts as they should judge proper to be generally known from the intercepted letters taken from Moses Kirkland and one written by John Stuart to the Committee of Intelligence.^^ On February 21st Mr. Salvador, from the first special com- mittee mentioned above, made a report to the Congress, but consideration of it was postponed,^^ and subsequently a part of the report was recommitted. In Congress, on Feb- ruary 28th, Salvador was appointed a teller for the *^Yeas" on the question of raising another regiment of riflemen for the regular service of the Revolutionary Government of South Carolina, and had the satisfaction of seeing the ques- tion carried by his side by a vote of fifty-one to thirty- " The South-Carolina Gazette, Sept. 7, 1775. " Extracts from the Journals of the Provincial Congress of South- Carolina, second session, held at Charles Town, Feb. 1-March 26, 1776 (Charles Town, 1776), p. 13. " Ibid., pp. 29-30. " Ibid., pp. 51-52. FRANCIS SALVADOR 73 seven.^^ On March 2d Mr. Salvador, for the special com- mittee, reported on the recommitted part of the original report, and consideration of the report was agreed upon for the next day. On March 3d, hefore proceeding with the consideration of Mr. Salvador's report, a committee of seven was appointed to consider ways and means of pay- ing for services already voted and report the next day, and Mr. Salvador was named as one of this committee.^ ^ On March 20th Mr. Salvador was placed upon a special com- mittee of five to report the next day what salaries were proper to be allowed to the several public officers.^® Dur- ing the consideration of the report the next day, a motion was made to agree to the provision fixing the salary of the President at £10,000 per annum, and when the question was put to the house Mr. Salvador was appointed teller for the ''Nays," who won.^^ On March 26th the engrossed copy of the new Constitution being laid before Congress, Colonel Charles Cotesworth Pinckney and Mr. Salvador were ap- pointed a special committee to examine it and compare it with the rough draft thereof. ^^ Later in the day Colonel Pinckney for this committee reported that he and Mr. Sal- vador had carefully examined the engrossed copy of the Constitution and found it correct.^ ^ The new Constitution was adopted that day and by one of its provisions the Pro- vincial Congress was declared to be the General Assembly of the new State until the 21st of October following, ^^ thus making Salvador one of the members of the first General Assembly of the new independent State of South Carolina. ^* Extracts from the Journals of the Provincial Congress of South- Carolina, second session, held at Charles Town, Feb. 1-March 26, 1776 (Charles Town, 1776), p. 69. " Ibid., p. 81. " Ibid., p. 132. " Ibid., p. 111. " Ibid., p. 133. " Ibid., p. 115. "• Ibid., p. 140. 74 THE JEWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA He participated in its proceedings until its adjournment on April 11, 1776. Soon after the adjournment of the General Assembly a British fleet, having under convoy transports bearing a British army, appeared before Charles Town and began preparations for an attack on the town. At the same time British emissaries on the frontier of South Carolina began to instigate the Cherokee Indians to deeds of violence against the people of the upper part of the Province. The Tories and Indians in the rear were expected to cooperate with the fleet and army in front and crush the rebellion at once. The fleet and army made a combined attack on the 28th of June and were severely defeated. The Indians made their onslaught on Monday, July 1st. They poured down upon the people of Ninety Six District, massacring all who fell in their way. One of the plantations they attacked was that of Captain Aaron Smith, on Little River. Two of Captain Smith's sons escaped on horseback — one riding to Mr. Salvador's plantation, on Coronaca Creek, and one to Major Andrew Williamson's plantation (White Hall). Mr. Salvador immediately rode to Williamson's. Major Williamson was then in command of the militia regi- ment of Ninety Six District, and he, with Salvador's assist- ance, immediately began to collect the militia of the neigh- borhood, and by Wednesday, July 3d, having collected forty men, marched to Smith's, whence they moved to a point about six miles above Captain Pickens's fort. Their force increased each day until the 8th, when it amounted to two hundred and twenty men, and they marched to Holmes's field, on Hogskin Creek, about four miles from the Chero- kee boundary line, at De Witt's Corner, and encamped. By the 16th Williamson's force had increased to four hun- dred and fifty, and he advanced to Barker's Creek. As Williamson had not been joined by any of the militia com- mands from the eastward of Saluda River, Mr. Salvador FRANCIS SALVADOR 75 rode thither on Saturday, July 13th, and found Colonel Williams and Colonel Lisle, with detachments from their commands, and two companies from Colonel Richardson's regiment, amounting in all to four hundred and thirty men. This force was attacked on Monday, the 15th, but repulsed the Indians and Tories. Williamson's force now rapidly increased. He was joined by a detachment of the 3d Regi- ment under Captain Felix Warley and Captain John Bowie's company of the 5th Regiment, and on July 25th marched to Hencoop Creek, destroying in the meantime all Indian villages and corn from the Cherokee boundary line to their middle settlement, and on the 29th to Twenty-Three Mile Creek, his force now amounting to 1,151 militia and regulars. Having been informed by two white prisoners, captured by his scouts, that some white men in the service of the British were encamped at Oconee Creek, about thirty miles away, and that they had been joined by the Essenecca Indians, who had completely abandoned their town on the Keowee River, Williamson decided to march at once to their camp and attack them. With a detachment of three hun- dred and thirty men on horseback, and the two prisoners as guides, he set out about six o'clock on the evening of July 31st for the purpose of surrounding the enemy's camp at daybreak the next morning. The Keowee River crossing Williamson's route, and only fordable at Seneca, obliged him to take the road by that village. Before he arrived at that point the enemy, having either learned of his march or expecting to ambush some of his scouts, had taken pos- session of the first houses in Seneca and had posted men behind a long fence on an eminence close to the road along which Williamson's detachment was to march, and, to pre- vent being seen, had filled up the openings between the rails with bushes and cornblades. When Williamson's force reached the spot, about half-past one o'clock in the morn- ing, they allowed the guides and advance guard to pass and 76 THE JEWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA then poured in a heavy fire upon Williamson's men. The attack, being unexpected, staggered the advance party. Williamson's horse was shot down and Salvador, riding with him, received three wounds and fell by his side, and before he could be found in the dark an Indian took his scalp — his being the only one taken. Captain Smith, son of the murdered Captain Aaron Smith, saw the Indian and could have stopped him, but thought it was Mr. Salvador's servant assisting his master and made no effort to stop him. He died forty-five minutes after receiving his wounds, sen- sible to the last. When Williamson returned to him, after defeating the enemy, he asked him if the enemy had been beaten, and, when answered in the affirmative, said he was glad of it and shook Williamson's hand, bade him farewell, and said he would die in a few moments. Thus perished, in the heyday of young manhood, one whose future was full of promise both to himself and to the young Republic.^^ ' ' The whole army regretted his loss, as he was universally loved and esteemed by them. ' ' ^^ Where he was buried we are not informed, but his body " Francis Salvador was only twenty-nine years of age at the time of his death. Mr. Hiihner, in his paper on Francis Salvador, read before the American Jewish Historical Society, informs us that " he was certainly no more than thirty-five or forty years of age at the time of his arrival." {Publications of the American Jewish Historical Society, No. 9, p. 111.) His guess is somewhat wide of the mark. His age at the time of his arrival was twenty-six. This fact is easily obtained from the following data : His father, Jacob Salvador, died in 1749. (See The Gentleman's Magazine, Vol. 19, p. 189.) Francis Salvador was about two yeaxs of age when his father died. (See Drayton: Memoirs, Vol. 2, p. 347.) He was there- fore born in 1747. He arrived in Charles Town in December, 1773. For further data concerning the family of Salvador see The Gentleman's Magazine, Vol. 6, p. 112; Vol. 8, p. 546; Vol. 10, p. 36; Vol. 11, pp. 554 and 608; Vol. 19, p. 189; Vol. 24, p. 484; Vol. 30, p. 249; Vol. 33, p. 618. " The Remembrancer for 1776, Part 2, p. 320. FRANCIS SALVADOR 77 was doubtless taken back to his plantation at Coronaca, He was the first Jew in America to represent the masses in a popular assembly .^^ " See Drayton : Memoirs of the American Revolution, Vol. 2, pp. 339- 350. Williamson's report to President Rutledge, published in Gibbes: Documentary History of the American Revolution, 1764-1776, pp. 125- 126. This report as published in Gibbes is incon-ectly copied. It is headed " Col. Thomson to W. H. Drayton" and the date is printed " 1775." It should, of eoui-se^ be 1776. At the outset of this expedition Williamson was only major of the Ninety Six District regiment, being the senior officer and in command, but while on this expedition he was promoted to the colonelcy of the regiment, receiving his commission about August 1st, Captain Le Roy Hammond receiving at the same time the lieutenant- colonelcy. See also The [London] Remembrancer for 1776, Part 1, p. 114, and Part 2, pp. 319-20. For some interesting Salvador correspond- ence see Gibbes: Documentary History, 1776-1782, pp. 24-30. CHAPTER F— THE REVOLUTIONARY PERIOD describe the part played by the Jews of South Carolina — or rather by the Jews of Charles Town, for there is nothing in the records, with one or two exceptions, of any other Jews of South Carolina who saw service in the field — is a task quite easy and yet difficult. Till now the story has not been written. A few traditional tales, distorted according as the imagination of the story- teller was more or less vigorous, and still further distorted by Jewish editors, are all that we now possess. No attempt has hitherto been made to go to original sources. Hence it is that the traditional items that found their way into Lee- ser's Occident some fifty years ago have gone the rounds of the newspapers and the books, and have been so often repeated that they have come to be looked upon as narra- tives of fact. Read the story of the Jews of Charleston where you will, you will find nothing but the same old stories told over and over again, with variations more or less absurd. The trouble with all past writers, without exception, has been that they have made no attempt to ascertain the facts. Our present data are all of them traditions which, while con- taining a germ of truth, are, like all traditions, largely unre- liable. Fortunately for us, historical material in Charleston is so abundant that it is possible to write the story of the 78 CAPTAIN ABRAHAM MENDEZ SEIXAS, I 7 5O— I 799 From an original oil-painting in the possession of Mr. Leopold H. Cohen, of New York THE R t^KRIOD (distorted describe the ; 1 by the Jews of South Carolina — or rather by the Jews of Charles Town, for there is ni feline: in the records, with one or two •ns, of any other Jews of South ho saw service in the field — ' ' ^'flicult. ■ ional ^tory- orted tempt nee it ay into Lee- he rounds so often IP narra- 'larleston e old ...J re or g a gei tion, has ' facts. e con- US, largely unre- ial in Charleston ..V, the story of the QQ^I-OJ-I