£173 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 00003755^1 &&: V* *'2Bf • V** .'&K&'. *< ious man, ought to respect and to cherish them. A volume could not trace all their connections with private and public felicity. Let it simply be asked, Where is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obli- gation desert the oaths, which are the instruments of 10 investigation in courts of justice ? And let us with caution indulge the supposition, that morality can be maintained without religion. Whatever may be con- ceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both for- bid us to expect, that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle. J Tis substantially true, that virtue or morality is a necessary spring of popular government. The rule, indeed, extends with more or less force to every species 20 of free government. Who, that is a sincere friend to it, can look with indifference upon attempts to shake the foundation of the fabric ? Promote, then, as an object of primary importance, institutions for the general diffusion of knowledge. 104 EPOCH-MAKING PAPERS Iii proportion as the structure of a government gives force to public opinion, it is essential that public opin- ion should be enlightened. As a very important source of strength and security, cherish public credit. One method of preserving it is, to use it as sparingly as possible ; avoiding occasions of expense by cultivating peace, but remembering also that timely disbursements to prepare for danger fre- quently prevent much greater disbursements to repel io it; avoiding likewise the accumulation of debt, not only by shunning occasions of expense, but by vigor- ous exertions in time of peace to discharge the debts, which unavoidable wars may have occasioned, not ungenerously throwing upon posterity the burthen, which we ourselves ought to bear. The execution of these maxims belongs to your representatives, but it is necessary that public opinion should cooperate. To facilitate to them the performance of their duty, it is essential that you should practically bear in mind, that 20 towards the payment of debts there must be revenue ; that to have revenue there must be taxes ; that no °taxes can be devised, which are not more or less inconvenient and unpleasant, that the intrinsic embar- rassment, inseparable from the selection of the proper objects (which is always a choice of difficulties), ought WASHINGTON'S FAREWELL ADDRESS 105 to be a decisive motive for a candid construction of the conduct of the government in making it, and for a spirit of acquiescence in the measures for obtaining revenue, which the public exigencies may at any time dictate. Observe good faith and justice towards all nations. Cultivate peace and harmony with all. Religion and morality enjoin this conduct ; and can it be, that good policy does not equally enjoin it? It will be worthy of a free, enlightened, and, at no distant period, a 10 great nation, to give to mankind the magnanimous and too novel example of a people °always guided by an exalted justice and benevolence. Who can doubt, that, in the course of time and things, the fruits of such a plan would richly repay any temporary advantages, which might be lost by a steady adherence to it? Can it be, that Providence has not connected the per- manent felicity of a nation with its virtue ? The experiment, at least, is recommended by every senti- ment which ennobles human nature. Alas ! is it 20 rendered impossible by its vices ? In the execution of such a plan, nothing is more essential, than that permanent, inveterate antipathies against particular nations, and passionate attachments for others, should be excluded ; and that, in place of 106 EPOCH-MAKING PAPERS them, just and amicable feelings towards all should be cultivated. The nation, which indulges towards another an habitual hatred, or an habitual fondness, is in some degree a slave. It is a slave to its animosity or to its affection, either of which is sufficient to lead it astray from its duty and its interest. Antipathy in one nation against another disposes each more readily to offer insult and injury, to lay hold of slight causes of umbrage, and to be haughty and intractable, when 10 accidental or trifling occasions of dispute occur. Hence frequent collisions, obstinate, envenomed, and bloody contests. The nation, prompted by ill-will and resentment, sometimes impels to war the government, contrary to the best calculations of policy. The govern- ment sometimes participates in the national propensity, and adopts through passion what reason would reject; at other times, it makes the animosity of the nation subservient to projects of hostility instigated by pride, ambition, and other sinister and pernicious motives. 20 The peace often, sometimes perhaps the liberty, of nations has been the victim. So likewise, a passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils. Sympathy for the favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest, in cases where no real WASHINGTON'S FAREWELL ADDRESS 107 common interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays the former into a partici- pation in the quarrels and wars of the latter, without adequate inducement or justification. It leads also to concessions to the favorite nation of privileges denied to others, which is apt doubly to injure the nation making the concessions ; by unnecessarily parting with what ought to have been retained; and by exciting jealousy, ill-will, and a disposition to retaliate, in the parties from whom equal privileges are withheld ; and 10 it gives to ambitious, corrupted, or deluded citizens, (who devote themselves to the favorite nation,) facility to betray or sacrifice the interests of their own country, without odium, sometimes even with popularity ; gild- ing, with the appearances of a virtuous sense of obliga- tion, a commendable deference for public opinion, or a laudable zeal for public good, the base or foolish com- pliances of ambition, corruption, or infatuation. As avenues to foreign influence in innumerable ways, such attachments are particularly alarming to 20 the truly enlightened and independent patriot. How many opportunities do they afford to tamper with domestic factions, to practise the arts of seduction, to mislead public opinion, to influence or awe the public councils ! Such an attachment of a small or weak, 108 EPOCH-MAKING PAPERS towards a great and powerful nation, dooms the former to be the satellite of the latter. Against the insidious wiles of °foreign influence, I conjure you to believe me, fellow-citizens, the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake ; since history and experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of republican government. But that jealousy, to be useful, must be impartial, else it becomes the instrument of the very influence to be io avoided, instead of a defense against it. Excessive partiality for one foreign nation, and excessive dis- like of another, cause those whom they actuate to see danger only on one side, and serve to veil and even second the arts of influence on the other. Eeal patriots, who may resist the intrigues of the favorite, are liable to become suspected and odious ; while its tools and dupes usurp the applause and confidence of the people, to surrender their interests. The great rule of conduct for us, in regard to for- 20 eign nations, is, in extending our commercial relations, to have with them as little political connection as possible. So far as we have already formed engage- ments, let them be fulfilled with perfect good faith. Here let us stop. Europe has a set of primary interests, which to us WASHINGTON'S FAREWELL ADDRESS 109 have none, or a very remote relation. Hence she must be engaged in frequent controversies, the causes of which are essentially foreign to our concerns. Hence, therefore, it must be unwise in us to impli- cate ourselves, by artificial ties, in the ordinary vicis- situdes of her politics, or the ordinary combinations and collisions of her friendships or enmities. Our detached and distant situation invites and en- ables us to pursue a different course. If we remain one people, under an efficient government, the period 10 is not far off, when we may defy material injury from external annoyance ; when we may take such an atti- tude as will cause the neutrality, we may at any time resolve upon, to be scrupulously respected ; when bel- ligerent nations, under the impossibility of making acquisitions upon us, will not lightly hazard the giv- ing us provocation; when we may choose peace or war, as our interest, guided by our justice, shall counsel. Why forego the advantages of so peculiar a situa- 20 tion? Why quit our own to stand upon foreign ground? Why, by interweaving our destiny with that of any part of Europe, entangle our peace and prosperity in the toils of European ambition, rival- ship, interest, humor, or caprice? 110 EPOCH-MAKING PAPERS 'Tis our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world; so far, I mean, as we are now at liberty to do it ; for let me not be understood as capable of patronizing infi- delity to existing engagements. I hold the maxim no less applicable to public than to private affairs, that honesty is always the best policy. I repeat it, there- fore, let those engagements be observed in their genuine sense. But, in my opinion, it is unnecessary 10 and would be unwise to extend them. Taking care always to keep ourselves, by suitable establishments, on a respectable defensive posture, we may safely trust to temporary alliances for extraor- dinary emergencies. Harmony, liberal intercourse with all nations, are recommended by policy, humanity, and interest. But even our commercial policy should hold an equal and impartial hand; neither seeking nor granting exclu- sive favors or preferences ; consulting the natural 20 course of things ; diffusing and diversifying by gentle means the streams of commerce, but forcing nothing ; establishing, with powers so disposed, in order to give trade a stable course, to define the rights of our mer- chants, and to enable the government to support them, conventional rules of intercourse, the best that present WASHINGTON'S FAREWELL ADDRESS 111 circumstances and mutual opinion will permit, but temporary, and liable to be from time to time aban- doned or varied, as experience and circumstances shall dictate ; constantly keeping in view, that 'tis folly in one nation to look for disinterested favors from another ; that it must pay with a portion of its independence for whatever it may accept under that character ; that, by such acceptance, it may place itself in the con- dition of having given equivalents for nominal favors, and yet of being reproached with ingratitude for not giving more. There can be no greater error than to expect or calculate upon real favors from nation to nation. It is an illusion, which experience must cure, which a just pride ought to discard. In offering to you, my countrymen, these counsels of an old and affectionate friend, I dare not hope they will make the strong and lasting impression I could wish ; that they will control the usual current of the passions, or prevent our nation from running the course, which has hitherto marked the destiuy of nations. But, if I may even natter myself, that they may be productive of some partial benefit, some occasional good ; that they may now and then recur to moderate the fury of party spirit, to warn against the mischiefs of foreign intrigue, to guard against the 112 EPOCH-MAKING PAPERS impostures of pretended patriotism; this hope will be a full recompense for the solicitude for your wel- fare, by which they have been dictated. How far, in the discharge of my official duties, I have been guided by the principles which have been delineated, the public' records and other evidences of my conduct must witness to you and to the world. To myself, the assurance of my own conscience is, that I have at least believed myself to be guided by them. ic In relation to the still subsisting war in Europe, my Proclamation of the 22d of April, 1793, is the index to my plan. Sanctioned by your approving voice, and by that of your representatives in both Houses of Con- gress, the spirit of that measure has continually gov- erned me, uninfluenced by any attempts to deter or divert me from it. After deliberate examination, with the aid of the best lights I could obtain, I was well satisfied that our country, under all the circumstances of the case, had a 20 right to take, and was bound in duty and interest to take, a neutral position. Having taken it, I deter- mined, as far as should depend upon me, to maintain it, with moderation, perseverance, and firmness. The considerations, which respect the right to hold this conduct, it is not necessary on this occasion to WASHINGTON'S FAREWELL ADDRESS 113 detail. I will only observe, that, according to my understanding of the matter, that right, so far from being denied by any of the belligerent powers, has been virtually admitted by all. The duty of holding a neutral conduct may be in- ferred, without any thing more, from the obligation which justice and humanity impose on every nation, in cases in which it is free to act, to maintain inviolate the relations of peace and amity towards other nations. The inducements of interest for observing that con- 10 duct will best be referred to your own reflections and experience. With me, a predominant motive has been to endeavour to gain time to our country to settle and mature its yet recent institutions, and to progress with- out interruption to that degree of strength and consist- ency, which is necessary to give it, humanly speaking, the command of its own fortunes. Though, in reviewing the incidents of my adminis- tration, I am unconscious of intentional error, I am nevertheless too sensible of my defects not to think 20 it probable that I may have committed many errors. Whatever they may be, I fervently beseech the Al- mighty to avert or mitigate the evils to which they may tend. I shall also carry with me the hope, that my country will never cease to view them with indul- 114 EPOCH-MAKING PAPERS gence ; and that, after forty-five years of my life dedi- cated to its service with an upright zeal, the faults of incompetent abilities will be consigned to oblivion, as myself must soon be to the mansions of rest. Relying on its kindness in this as in other things, and actuated by that fervent love towards it, which is so natural to a man, who views in it the native soil of himself and his progenitors for several generations ; I anticipate with pleasing expectation that retreat, in io which I promise myself to realize, without alloy, the sweet enjoyment of partaking, in the midst of my fel- low-citizens, the benign influence of good laws under a free government, the ever favorite object of my heart, and the happy reward, as I trust, of our mutual cares, labors, and dangers. GEORGE WASHINGTON. United States, September 17th, 1796. THE MISSOURI COMPROMISE Historical Note. — The first two decades of the nineteenth century saw a marked change in the attitude of the people of the United States towards negro slavery. On account of the increased financial returns of cotton culture, slavery was, in 1820, deemed by the South economically profitable and neces- sary to its continued prosperity. The North had abolished slavery and, wedded to the system of free labor, had adopted a position of pronounced antagonism to further slave extension. The Ordinance of 1787 had preserved the old Northwest States for freedom, while the new States, south of the Ohio, had all become slaveholding. Seven of the original thirteen States had abolished slavery, while six had retained the system. Four of the nine new States were free and five were slave. Thus there were, in 1819, eleven free and eleven slave States. The territory acquired by purchase from France in 1803 was, by French law, affirmed by Congress, open to slavery throughout its whole extent. As the equal division of States between free and slave interests made impossible any amendment to the federal constitution restricting or abolishing slavery, its oppo- nents hoped to accomplish their ends by imposing freedom from slavery, as a condition of admission, upon all States to be re- ceived, in the future, into the Union, and thus eventually to obtain the three-fourths majority necessary for the passage of a constitutional amendment. 115 116 EPOCH-MAKING PAPERS The great struggle between the North and South was pre- cipitated by the Tallniadge amendment of February 13, 1819, to a bill admitting Missouri as a State of the Union, which pro- vided for the eventual abolition of slavery in the proposed State. The House passed the bill thus amended, but the amend- ment was rejected in the Senate, and the measure was lost. At the next session of Congress the contest was renewed, and after a long and bitter struggle a compromise was agreed to forbid- ding slavery in all the Louisiana purchase, excluding Missouri, north of 30° 30' north latitude. Maine was, at the same time, admitted as a free State to preserve the balance between the two sections. A clause in the Missouri constitution, imposing upon the State legislature the duty of prohibiting mulattoes and free negroes from acquiring residence in the State, brought about a renewal of the great controversy when that document was pre- sented to the next Congress for its approval. This clause was considered contrary to the Constitution of the United States ; and by a second compromise, proposed by Henry Clay, Mis- souri was finally admitted to the Union only on the condition that the above-mentioned clause should be virtually nullified. By the Missouri Compromise the North won the advantage from the material point of view, as she obtained a far greater area of territory capable of division into future free States, while the South won the main constitutional points involved. The struggle over the Compromise taught the South that the security of their system lay in a strict construction of the Constitution, and confirmed them in their support of the " States Rights" theory of the Constitution. The settlement has been often and THE MISSOURI COMPROMISE 117 bitterly assailed as a national recognition of a great evil, but its alternative — secession of the Southern States — could not, in ail probability, have been prevented by the North in 1820. It unquestionably delayed for a generation the great struggle between the sections, and when the issue was again clearly joined, the balance of power had definitely inclined to the northern side. THE MISSOUEI COMPROMISE An Act to authorize the people of Missouri Territory to form a constitution and State government, and for the admission of such State into the Union on an equal footing with the original States, and to prohibit slavery in certain territories. Be it enacted, by the Senate and House of Represen- tatives of the United States of America in Congress as- sembled, That the inhabitants of that portion of the "Missouri Territory included within the ^boundaries hereinafter designated, be, and they are hereby, author- ized to form for themselves a constitution and State government, and to assume such name as they shall deem proper ; and the said State, when formed, shall be admitted into the Union, upon an °equal footing with the original States, in all respects whatsoever. Sec. 3. And be it further enacted, That all free white male citizens of the United States, who shall v 118 EPOCH-MAKING PAPERS have arrived at the age of twenty-one years, and have resided in said Territory three months previous to the day of election, and all other persons qualified to vote for representatives to the General Assembly of the said Territory, shall be qualified to be elected, and they are hereby qualified and authorized to vote, and choose representatives to form a convention, . . . Sec. 4. And be it further enacted, That the mem- bers of the convention thus duly elected, shall be, and io they are hereby, authorized to meet at the seat of gov- ernment of said Territory, on the second Monday of the month of June next; and the said convention, when so assembled, shall have power and authority to adjourn to any other place in the said Territory, which to them shall seem best for the convenient transaction of their business ; and which Convention, when so met, shall first determine, by a majority of the whole number elected, whether it be, or be not, expedient at that time to form a constitution and State government, 20 for the people within the said Territory, as included within the boundaries above designated ; and, if it be deemed expedient, the convention shall be, and hereby is, authorized to form a constitution and State govern- ment; or, if it be deemed more expedient, the said convention shall provide by ordinance for electing THE MISSOURI COMPROMISE 119 representatives to form a constitution or frame of government; which said representatives shall be chosen in such manner, and in such proportion, as they shall designate ; and shall meet at such time and place as shall be prescribed by the said ordinance ; and shall then form for the people of said Territory, within the boundaries aforesaid, a constitution and State government : Provided, That the same, whenever formed, shall be Republican and not repugnant to the Constitution of the United States ; and that the Legis- 10 lature of said State shall never interfere with the pri- mary disposal of the °soil by the United States, nor with any regulations Congress may find necessary for securing the title in such soil to the bona fide pur- chasers; and that no tax shall be imposed on lands the property of the United States; and in no case shall non-resident proprietors be taxed higher than residents. Sec. 7. And be it further enacted, That, in case a constitution and State government shall be formed 20 for the people of said Territory of Missouri, the said convention or representatives, as soon thereafter as may be, shall cause a true and attested copy of such constitution, or frame of State government, as shall be formed or provided, to be transmitted to Congress. 120 EPOCH-MAKING PAPERS Sec. 8. And be it further enacted, That in all that territory ceded by France to the United States, under the name of Louisiana^ which lies north of thirty-six degrees and thirty minutes north latitude, not in- cluded within the limits of the State contemplated by this act, °slavery and involuntary servitude, otherwise than in the punishment of crimes, whereof the par- ties shall have been duly convicted, shall be, and is hereby, forever prohibited : Provided always, That any person escaping into the same, from whom labor or service is lawfully claimed, in any State or Territory of the United States, such fugitive may be lawfully claimed and conveyed to the person claiming his or her labor or services as aforesaid. Approved, March 6, 1820. THE RESOLUTION OF MARCH 2, 1821 RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ADMISSION OF MIS- SOURI INTO THE UNION ON A CERTAIN CONDITION Resolved, by the Senate and House of Representatives 20 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That Missouri shall be admitted into this Union on an equal footing with the original States, in all re- THE MISSOURI COMPROMISE 121 spects whatever, upon the fundamental condition, that the "fourth clause of the twenty-sixth section of the third article of the constitution submitted on the part of said State to Congress, shall never be construed to authorize the passage of any law, and that no law shall be passed in conformity thereto, by which any citizen, of either of the States in this Union, shall be excluded from the enjoyment of any of the privileges and immunities to which such citizen is entitled under the Constitution of the United States : Provided, That 10 the Legislature of said State, by a solemn public act, shall declare the assent of the said State, to the said fundamental condition, and shall transmit to the Presi- dent of the United States on or before the fourth Monday in November next, an authentic copy of the said act ; upon the receipt whereof, the President, by proclamation, shall announce the fact; whereupon, and without any further proceeding on the part of Con- gress, the admission of the said State into the Union shall be considered as complete. 20 Approved, March 2, 1821. THE MONROE DOCTRINE Historical Note. — The allied monarchs of Europe, after the downfall of Napoleon, entered into an agreement called the Holy Alliance, the purpose of which was to unite these powerful rulers in the interest of the peace and religious and moral welfare of Europe. This, or more properly speaking, a succeeding alliance, soon became a league of the great conti- nental monarchs for the purpose of repressing liberal or consti- tutional movements and of maintaining everywhere the principle of absolute monarchy. In 1820 revolutions broke out in southern Europe which occasioned armed intervention by Prussia, Austria, and Russia for the purpose of overthrowing liberalism and of reestablishing the legitimate sovereigns on the thrones from which they had been driven. France, supported by the three powers above mentioned, sent an army into Spain in 1822, put down the revo- lution, and restored the absolutist Ferdinand. An intimation that the powers meant to go farther, and assist Spain in recov- ering her revolted provinces in America, which had long main- tained their practical independence, led President Monroe to issue his famous message declaring that such an attempt would be considered an act unfriendly to the United States. The protest was decisive, and no further attempt was made by the allied powers to extend their system to America or to interfere in transatlantic affairs. The weakness of the Spanish- American States, which constantly invited conquest or control by ambi- 122 THE MONROE DOCTRINE 123 tious European powers, and the advantages which we derived from our unique position on the American continents and from the absence of great military powers in America, induced Presi- dent Monroe to go farther and declare, as a cardinal feature of American state policy, that we would oppose the attempt of any European power to conquer or control the independent States of North and South America. The principles of the Monroe Doctrine had been for twenty- five years slowly taking shape at the hands of American statesmen. The Monroe Doctrine is a logical development of Washington's policy of non-intervention in European affairs. Washington, Hamilton, John Adams, Jefferson, Madison, and John Quincy Adams all contributed to its development. The Monroe Doctrine was a statement of policy which bound only the executive department of government for the time being. Subsequent governments have been free to act as the interests of the country dictated. It is not the law of the land. Its binding force has arisen from the belief of successive presidents that it fur- nishes a safe and necessary rule for governmental action. The fact that so many administrations have guided their action by its principles, successfully enforcing them against foreign powers, have given it great prestige. European nations do not recognize the doctrine as a part of international law, hence its observance by them is due, and due only, to our power to enforce the doctrine. THE MONROE DOCTRINE MESSAGE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES AT THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE FIRST SESSION OF THE EIGHTEENTH CONGRESS Fellow-citizens of the Senate and House of Representa- tives : Many important subjects will claim" y on r attention during the present session, of which I shall endeavor to give, in aid of your deliberations, a just idea in this io communication. I undertake this duty with diffidence, from the vast extent of the interests on which I have to treat, and of their great importance to every portion of our Union. I enter on it with zeal, from thorough conviction that there never was a period since the establishment of our Revolution when, regarding the condition of the civilized world and its bearing on us, there was greater necessity for devotion in the public servants to their respective duties, or for virtue, patriotism, and union in our constituents. 20 Meeting in you a new Congress, I deem it proper to present this view of public affairs in greater detail than might otherwise be necessary. I do it, however, with peculiar satisfaction, from a knowledge that in 124 THE MONROE DOCTRINE 125 this respect I shall comply more fully with the sound principles of our Government. The people being with us exclusively the sovereign, it is indispensable that full information be laid before them on all important subjects to enable them to exercise that high power with complete effect. A precise knowledge of our relations with foreign powers, as respects our negotiations and transactions with each, is thought to be particularly necessary. ... It is by rendering justice to other nations that 10 we may expect it from them. It is by our ability to resent injuries and redress wrongs that we may avoid them. At the proposal of the Russian Imperial Govern- ment, made through the minister of the Emperor residing here, a full power and instructions have been transmitted to the minister of the United States at St. Petersburg, to arrange, by amicable Negotiation the respective rights and interests of the two nations on the northwest coast of this continent. A similar 20 proposal has been made by his Imperial Majesty to the Government of Great Britain, which has likewise been acceded to. The Government of the United 126 EPOCH-MAKING PAPERS States has been desirous, by this friendly proceeding, of manifesting the great value which they have inva- riably attached to the friendship of the Emperor, and their solicitude to cultivate the best understanding with his Government. In the discussions to which this interest has given rise, and in the arrangements by which they may terminate, the occasion has been judged proper for asserting as a principle in which the rights and interests of the United States are in- 10 volved, that the American continents, by the free and independent condition which they have assumed and maintain, are henceforth not to be considered as sub- jects for °future colonization by any European powers. It was stated at the commencement of the last session that a great effort was then making in Spain and Portugal to improve the condition of the people of those countries, and that it appeared to be conducted with extraordinary moderation. It need scarcely be remarked that the result has been, so far, very different 20 from what was then anticipated. Of events in that quarter of the globe with which we have so much intercourse, and from which we derive our origin, we have- always been anxious and interested spectators. THE MONROE DOCTRINE 127 The citizens of the United States cherish sentiments the most friendly in favor of the liberty arid happiness of their fellow-men on that side of the Atlantic. In the wars of the European powers in matters relating to themselves we have never taken any part, nor does it comport with our policy so to do. It is only when our rights are invaded or seriously menaced that we resent injuries or make preparation for our defense. \yith the movements in this hemisphere we are, of necessity, more immediately connected, and by causes 10 which must be obvious to all enlightened and impartial observers. The °political system of the allied powers is essentially different in this respect from that of America. This difference proceeds from that which exists in their respective Governments. And to the defense of our own, which has been achieved by the loss of so much blood and treasure, and matured by the wisdom of their most enlightened citizens, and under which we have enjoyed unexampled felicity, this whole nation is devoted. We owe it, therefore, 20 to candor, and to the amicable relations existing between the United States and those powers, to de- clare that we should consider any attempt on their part to extend their °system to any portion of this hemisphere as dangerous to our peace and safety. 128 EPOCH-MAKING PAPERS With the existing colonies or dependencies of any European power we have not interfered and shall not interfere. But with the Governments who have declared their independence, and maintained it, and whose independence we have, on great consideration and on just principles, acknowledged, we could not view °any interposition for the purpose of oppressing them, or controlling in any other manner their des- tiny, by any European power, in any other light than 10 as the manifestation of an unfriendly disposition towards the United States. In the war between these new Governments and Spain we declared our neutrality at the time of their recognition, and to this we have adhered and shall continue to adhere, pro- vided no change shall occur which, in the judgment of the competent authorities of this Government, shall make a corresponding change on the part of the United States indispensable to their security. The late events in Spain and Portugal show that 20 Europe is still unsettled. Of this important fact no stronger proof can be adduced than that the allied powers should have thought it proper, on any prin- ciple satisfactory to themselves, to have °interposed, by force, in the internal concerns of Spain. To what extent such interposition may be carried, on the same THE MONROE DOCTRINE 129 principle, is a question in which all independent powers whose governments differ from theirs are in- terested, even those most remote, and surely none more so than the United States. Our °policy in re- gard to Europe, which was adopted at an early stage of the wars which have so long agitated that quarter of the globe, nevertheless remains the same, which is, not to interfere in the internal concerns of any of its powers ; to consider the Government °de facto as the legitimate Government for us; to cultivate friendly ™ relations with it, and to preserve those relations by a frank, firm, and manly policy, meeting, in all in- stances, the just claims of every power; submitting to injuries from none. But in regard to these conti- nents, circumstances are eminently and conspicuously different. It is impossible that the allied powers should extend their political system to any portion of either continent without endangering our peace and happiness ; nor can any one believe that our Southern brethren, if left to themselves, would adopt it of their 20 own accord. It is equally impossible, therefore, that we should behold such interposition, in any form, with indifference. If we look to the comparative strength and resources of Spain and those new Gov- ernments, and their distance from each other, it must 130 EPOCH-MAKING PAPERS be obvious that she can never subdue them. It is still the true policy of the United States to leave the parties to themselves, in the hope that other powers will pursue the same course. JAMES MONKOE. Washington, Dec. 2, 1823. THE COMPEOMISE OF 1850 Historical Note. — The acquisition of a vast territory from Mexico as the result of the war with that country precipitated a struggle between the slave and anti-slave interests of the United States that aroused sectional passion to a degree never before shown and threatened to disrupt the Union. The Wilmot Proviso was a clear and concise statement of the anti-slavery position. It was to the effect that slavery should not exist in the territory to be acquired from Mexico. The southern position was that Union was based upon a solemn compromise between the sections, and that the preservation of the Union depended upon a faithful adherence to the spirit of the compromise which demanded that new territory, acquired by the nation, should be divided equally, as to its status respecting slavery, between the two sections. On no other basis, the slave owner said, could Union be preserved, or would it be worth preserving. On the other hand, the Wilmot Proviso was the expression of a public opinion which had been rapidly gaining ground in the North, and a large party demanded that slave extension should be prohibited, where Congress had the undoubted right to legislate. Meanwhile the interests of the inhabitants of the region in dispute were suffering greatly from the failure of Congress to provide some form of government for them. The rapid influx of settlers into California, as a result of the discovery of gold, made some action by Congress an imperative necessity. The 131 132 EPOCH-MAKING PAPERS thirty-first Congress found that the Californians, acting upon the advice of President Taylor, had taken the matter into their own hands, had held a convention, had adopted a state constitu- tion, and were knocking at the doors of Congress for admission as a State. Henry Clay thought that by combining all the important points at issue between the sections in one great measure, in which by mutual concessions and fair compromise substantial justice would be done to each side, a permanent solution of the great problem would be reached, and the Union he so dearly loved would be saved. It was found impossible to pass an omnibus bill, as Clay desired ; but by dividing his measures, the more important of them were finally passed as separate bills. By the series of acts which constituted the Compromise of 1850, California was admitted as a free State, the remaining territory acquired from Mexico was given regular territorial organization without congressional restriction as to slavery, the dispute con- cerning the boundary of Texas was compromised, ten million dollars being paid her in compensation for the claims surren- dered, slave trade in the District of Columbia was abolished, and a rigorous fugitive slave law was passed. The hope of the framers that the Compromise would allay sectional strife was made impossible of fulfilment by the last of these provisions. Instead of removing the occasion for contro- versy or discussion, it increased the agitation in the North. The enforcement of the Fugitive Slave Law so outraged public senti- ment in the North that great numbers, who were formerly indif- ferent, decided to oppose by every means in their power a system that was thus in its worst features brought to their very doors. THE COMPROMISE OF 1850 EXTRACTS FROM THE SERIES OF ACTS WHICH TO- GETHER FORM THE COMPROMISE OF 1850 Chap. XL IX. An Act proposing to the State of Texas the Establishment of her Northern and Western Boundaries, the Relinquishment by the said State of all Territory claimed by her exterior to said Boun- daries, and of all her Claims upon the United States, and to establish a territorial Government for New Mexico. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Bepre- 10 sentatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the following propositions shall be, and the same hereby are, offered to the State of Texas, which, when agreed to by the said State in an act passed by the general assembly, shall be binding and obligatory upon the United States, and upon the said State of Texas : Provided, The said agreement by the said general assembly shall be given on or before the first day of December, eighteen hundred and fifty : First. The State of Texas.will agree that her °boun- 20 dary on the north shall commence at the point at which the meridian of one hundred degrees west from 133 134 EPOCH-MAKING PAPERS Greenwich is intersected by the parallel of thirty-six degrees thirty minutes north latitude, and shall run from said point due west to the meridian of one hun- dred and three degrees west from Greenwich ; thence her boundary shall run due south to the thirty-second degree of north latitude ; thence on the said parallel of thirty-two degrees of north latitude to the °Rio Bravo del Norte, and thence with the channel of said river to the Gulf of Mexico. io Second. The State of Texas cedes to the United States all her claim to territory exterior to the limits and boundaries which she agrees to establish by the first article of this agreement. Third. The State of Texas relinquishes all claim upon the United States for liability of the debts of Texas, and for compensation or indemnity for the surrender to the United States of her ships, forts, arsenals, custom-houses, custom-house revenue, arms and munitions of war, and public buildings with their 20 sites which became the property of the United States at the time of the annexation. Fourth. The United States, in consideration of said establishment of boundaries, cession of claim to terri- tory, and relinquishment of claims, will pay to the State of Texas the sum of ten millions of dollars in THE COMPROMISE OF 1850 135 a stock bearing five per cent, interest, and redeemable at the end of fourteen years, the interest payable half- yearly at the treasury of the United States. Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That all that por- tion of the territory of the United States bounded as follows : Beginning at a point in the Colorado River, where the boundary line with the republic of Mexico crosses the same; thence eastwardly with the said boundary line to the Rio Grande; thence following the main channel of said river to the parallel of the io thirty-second degree of north latitude ; thence east with said degree to its intersection with the one hun- dred and third degree of longitude west of Greenwich ; thence north with the said degree of longitude to the parallel of thirty-eighth degree of north latitude ; thence west with said parallel to the summit of Sierra Madre ; thence south with the crest of said mountains to the thirty-seventh parallel of north latitude ; thence west with said parallel to its intersection with the boundary line of the State of California ; thence with 20 said boundary line to the place of beginning — be, and the same is hereby, erected into a temporary govern- ment, by the name of the Territory of New Mexico ; Provided, That nothing in this act contained shall be 136 EPOCH-MAKING PAPERS construed to inhibit the government of the United States from dividing said Territory into two or more Territories, in such manner and at such times as Con- gress shall deem convenient and proper, or from attaching any portion thereof to any other Territory or State : And provided further That, when admitted as a State, the said Territory, or any portion of the same shall be received into the Union, °with or with- out slavery, as their constitution may prescribe at the io time of their admission. . . . Approved, September 9, 1850. Chap. L. An Act for the Admission of the State of California into the Union. Whereas the people of California have presented a constitution and asked admission into the Union, which constitution was submitted to Congress by the President of the United States by message dated February thir- teenth, eighteen hundred and fifty, and which, on due examination, is found to be republican in its form of 20 government. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa- tives of the United States of America in Congress assem- bled, That the State of California shall be one, and is THE COMPROMISE OF 1850 137 hereby declared to be one, of the United States of America; and admitted into the Union on an equal footing with the original States in all respects whatever. Approved, September 9, 1850. Chap. LI. An Act to establish a Territorial Government for Utah. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Represen- tatives of the United States in Congress assembled, That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the following limits, to wit : bounded io on the west by the State of California, on the north by the Territory of Oregon, and on the east by the sum- mit of the Rocky Mountains, and on the south by the thirty-seventh parallel of north latitude, be, and the same is hereby, created into a temporary government, by the name of the Territory of Utah ; and when ad- mitted as a State, the said Territory, or any portion of the same, shall be received into the Union, with or without slavery, as their constitution may prescribe at the time of their admission: Provided, That nothing 20 in this act contained shall be construed to inhibit the government of the United States from dividing said Territory into two or more Territories, in such manner 138 EPOCH-MAKING PAPERS and at such times as Congress shall deem convenient and proper, or from attaching any portion of said Terri- tory to any other State or Territory of the United States. Approved, September 9, 1850. Chap. LX. An °Act to amend and supplementary to, the Act entitled " An Act respecting Fugitives from Jus- tice, and Persons escaping from the Service of their Masters," approved February twelfth, one thousand seven hundred and ninty-three. io Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Represen- tatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the persons who have been, or may hereafter be, appointed commissioners, in virtue of any act of Congress, by the Circuit Courts of the United States, and who, in consequence of such appointment, are authorized to exercise the powers that any justice of the peace, or other magistrate of any of the United States, may exercise in respect to offenders for any crime or offense against the United States, by arrest- 20 ing, imprisoning, or bailing the same under and by virtue of the thirty-third section of the act of the twenty-fourth of September seventeen hundred and eighty-nine, entitled "An Act to establish the judicial THE COMPROMISE OF 1850 139 courts of the United States " shall be, and are hereby, authorized and required to exercise and discharge all the powers and duties conferred by this act. Sec. 4. And be it further enacted, That the Commis- sioners above named shall have concurrent jurisdiction with the judges of the Circuit and District Courts of the United States, in their respective circuits and dis- tricts within the several States, and the judges of the Superior Courts of the Territories, severally and col- lectively, in term-time and vacation j and shall grant io certificates to such claimants, upon satisfactory proof being made, with authority to take and remove such fugitives from service or labor, under the restrictions herein contained, to the State or Territory from which such persons may have escaped or fled. Sec 5, And be it further enacted, That it shall be the duty of all °marshals and deputy marshals to obey and execute all warrants and precepts issued under the provisions of this act, when to them directed ; and should any marshal or deputy marshal refuse to receive 20 such warrant, or other process, when tendered, or to use all proper means diligently to execute the same, he shall, on conviction thereof, be fined in the sum of one thousand dollars, to the use of such claimant, on 140 EPOCH-MAKING PAPERS the motion of such claimant, by the Circuit or District Court for the district of such marshal ; and after arrest of such fugitive, by such marshal or his deputy, or whilst at any time in his custody under the provi- sions of this act, should such fugitive °escape, whether with or without the assent of such marshal or his deputy; such marshal shall be liable, on his official bond, to be prosecuted for the benefit of such claimant, for the full value of the service or labor of said fugi- io tive in the State, Territory, or District whence he escaped: and the better to enable the said commis- sioners, when thus appointed, to execute their duties faithfully and efficiently, in conformity with the re- quirements of the Constitution of the United States and of this act, they are hereby authorized and empowered, within their countries respectively, to appoint in writing under their hands, any one or more suitable persons, from time to time, to execute all such warrants and other process as may be issued by them 20 in the lawful performance of their respective duties ; with authority to such commissioners, or the persons to be appointed by them, to execute process as aforesaid, to summon and call to their aid the bystanders, or °posse comitatus of the proper county, when necessary to ensure a faithful observance of the clause of the THE COMPROMISE OF 1S50 141 Constitution referred to, in conformity with the pro- visions of this act ; and all good citizens are hereby commanded to aid and assist in the prompt and effi- cient execution of this law, whenever their services may be required, as aforesaid, for that purpose ; and said warrants shall run, and be executed by said officers, any where in the State within which they are issued. Sec. 6. And be it further enacted, That when a person held to service or labor in any State or Territory 10 of the United States has heretofore or shall hereafter escape into another State or Territory of the United States the person or persons to whom such service or labor may be due, or his, her, or their agent or attor- ney, duly authorized by power of attorney, in writing, acknowledged and certified under the seal of some officer or court of the State or Territory in which the same may be executed, may pursue and reclaim such fugitive person, either by procuring a warrant from some one of the courts, judges, or commissioners afore- 20 said, of the proper circuit, district, or county, for the apprehension of such fugitive from service or labor, or by seizing and arresting such fugitive, when the same can be done without process, and by taking, or causing such person to be taken, forthwith before such 142 EPOCH-MAKING PAPERS court, judge, or commissioner, whose duty it shall be to hear and determine the case of such claimant in a summary manner ; and upon satisfactory proof be- ing made, by deposition or affidavit, in writing, to be taken and certified by such court, judge, or commis- sioner, or by other satisfactory testimony, duly taken and certified by some court, magistrate, justice of the peace, or other legal officer authorized to administer an oath and take deposition under the laws of* the State io or Territory from which such person owing service or labor may have escaped, with a certificate of such mag- istracy or other authority, as aforesaid, with the seal of the proper court or officer thereto attached, which seal shall be sufficient to establish the competency of the proof y and with proof, also by affidavit, of the iden- tity of the person whose service or labor is claimed to be due as aforesaid, that the person so arrested does in fact owe service or labor to the person or persons claiming him or her, in the State or Territory from 20 which such fugitive may have escaped as aforesaid, and that said person escaped, to make out and deliver to such claimant, his or her agent or attorney, a cer- tificate setting forth the substantial facts as to the ser- vice or labor due from such fugitive to the claimant, and of his or her escape from the State or Territory THE COMPROMISE OF 1850 143 in which such service or labor was due, to the State or Territory, in which he or she was arrested, with authority to such claimant, or his or her agent or attorney, to use such reasonable force and restraint as may be necessary, under the circumstances of the case, to take and remove such fugitive person back to the State or Territory whence he or she may have escaped as aforesaid. In no trial or hearing under this act shall the testimony of such alleged fugitive be ad- mitted in evidence, and the certificates in this and jo the first (fourth) section mentioned, shall be conclusive of the right of the person or persons in whose favor granted, to remove such fugitive to the State or Ter- ritory from which he escaped, and shall prevent all molestation of such person or persons, by °any process issued by any court, judge, magistrate, or other person whomsoever. Sec. 7. And be it further enacted, That any person who shall knowingly and willingly obstruct, hinder, or prevent such claimant, his agent or attorney, or 20 any person or persons lawfully assisting him, her, or them, from arresting such a fugitive from service or labor, either with or without process as aforesaid, or shall rescue, or attempt to rescue, such fugitive from service or labor, from the custody of such claim- 144 EPOCH-MAKING PAPERS ant, his or her agent or attorney, or other person or persons lawfully assisting as aforesaid, when so arrested, pursuant to the authority herein given and declared; or shall aid, abet, or assist such person so owing service or labor as aforesaid, directly or in- directly, to escape from such claimant, his agent or attorney, or other person or persons legally author- ized as aforesaid; or shall harbor or conceal such fugitive, so as to prevent the discovery and arrest 10 of such person, after notice or knowledge of the fact that such person was a fugitive from service or labor as aforesaid, shall, for either of said offenses, be sub- ject to a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars, and imprisonment not exceeding six months, by indict- ment and conviction before the District Court of the United States for the district in which such offense may have been committed, or before the proper court of criminal jurisdiction, if committed within any one of the organized Territories of the United States ; and 20 shall moreover forfeit and pay, by way of civil damages to the party injured by such illegal conduct, the sum of one thousand dollars, for each fugitive so lost as afore- said, to be recovered by action of debt, in any of the District or Territorial Courts aforesaid, within whose jurisdiction the said offense may have been committed. THE COMPROMISE OF 1850 145 Sec. 9. And be it further enacted, That upon affi- davit, made by the claimant of such fugitive, his agent or attorney, after such certificate has been issued, that he has reason to apprehend that such fugitive will be rescued by force from his or their possession before he can be taken beyond the limits of the State in which the arrest is made, it shall be the duty of the officer making the arrest to retain such fugitive in his custody, and to remove him to the State whence he fled, and there to deliver him to such io claimant, his agent, or attorney. And to this end, the officer aforesaid is hereby authorized and required to employ so many persons as he may deem necessary to overcome such force, and to retain them in his service so long as circumstances may require. The said offi- cer and his assistants, while so employed, to receive the same compensation, and to be allowed the same expenses, as are now allowed by law for transporta- tion of criminals, to be certified by the judge of the district within which the arrest is made, and paid out 20 of the treasury of the United States. Sec 10. And be it further enacted, That when any person held to service or labor in any State or Terri- tory, or in the District of Columbia, shall escape there- 146 EPOCH-MAKING PAPERS from, the party to whom such service or labor shall be due, his, her, or their agent or attorney, may apply to any court of record therein, or judge thereof in vacation, and make satisfactory proof to such court, or judge in vacation, of the escape aforesaid, and that the person escaping owed service or labor to such party. Whereupon the court shall cause a record to be made of the matters so proved, and also a general description of the person so escaping, with such con- io venient certainty as may be ; and a transcript of such record, authenticated by the attestation of the clerk and of the seal of the said court, being produced in any other State, Territory or district in which the person so escaping may be found, and being exhibited to any judge, commissioner, or other officer author- ized by the law of the United States to cause persons escaping from service or labor to be delivered up, shall be held and taken to be full and conclusive evidence of the fact of escape, and that the service or 20 labor of the person escaping is due to the party in such record mentioned. And upon the production by the said party of other and further evidence if neces- sary, either oral or by affidavit, in addition to what is contained in the said record of the identity of the person escaping, °he or she shall be delivered up to THE COMPROMISE OF 1850 147 the claimant. And the said court, commissioner, judge, or other person authorized by this act to grant certificates to claimants of fugitives, shall, upon the production of the record and other evidences afore- said, grant to such claimant a certificate of his right to take any such person identified and proved to be owing service or labor as aforesaid, which certificate shall authorize such claimant to seize or arrest and transport such person to the State or Territory from which he escaped: Provided, That nothing herein 10 contained shall be construed as requiring the pro- duction of a transcript of such record as evidence as aforesaid. But in its absence the claim shall be heard and determined upon other satisfactory proofs, competent in law. Approved, Sept. 18, 1850. Chap. LXIII. An Act to suppress the Slave Trade in the District of Columbia. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa- tives of the United States of America in Congress 20 assembled, That from and after the first day of Janu- ary, eighteen hundred and fifty-one, it shall not be lawful to bring into the District of Columbia any 148 EPOCH-MAKING PAPERS slave whatever, for the purpose of being °sold, or for the purpose of being placed in depot, to be subse- quently transferred to any other State or place to be sold as merchandise. And if any slave shall be brought into the said District by its owner, or by the authority or consent of its owner, contrary to the pro- visions of this act, such slave shall thereupon become liberated and free. Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That it shall and may be lawful for each of the corporations of the cities of Washington and Georgetown, from time to time, and as often as may be necessary, to abate, break up, and abolish any depot or place of confinement of slaves brought into the said District as merchandise, contrary to the provisions of this act, by such appropriate means as may appear to either of the said corporations expedient and proper. And the same power is hereby vested in the Levy Court of Washington County, if any attempt shall be made, within its jurisdictional limits, to establish a depot or place of confinement for slaves brought into the said District as merchandise for sale contrary to this act. Approved, September 20, 1850. THE KANSAS-NEBRASKA ACT Historical Note. — In the presidential campaign of 1852 both the Democratic and the Whig parties adopted, as the chief plank of their party platforms, what was known as the finality- clause. That is, they both agreed to abide by, and honestly live up to, the Compromise of 1850, as the final and equitable settlement of the great subjects of sectional dispute. In less than two years the struggle broke out again with in- creased bitterness over the organization of the Nebraska Terri- tory. Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois was the leader of the north- ern wing of the Democratic party. As chairman of the Senate Committee on Territories he reported a bill which reopened the whole question of slavery extension, was the cause of the forma- tion of the Republican party, and led directly to the War of the Rebellion. The Missouri Compromise had been regarded for thirty-four years as a solemn and binding contract between the North and South. Douglas proposed a measure that violated this agreement, under the plea that it was opposed to the principle of popular sovereignty. He declared that the inhabitants of a ter- ritory were as well qualified and had as good a right to choose their own institutions as the citizens of a State. He said that the Compromise of 1850 had adopted this principle in allowing New Mexico and Utah to decide for themselves whether they would adopt slavery or not, and he maintained that he was simply extending this sound principle to the other territories. 149 150 EPOCH-MAKING PAPERS While nothing can be more certain than that the Acts of 1850 had not been intended to nullify or repeal the Missouri Com- promise, the idea of popular or squatter sovereignty appealed to the democratic instincts of the people of the Northwest, and gained a sufficient number of votes from their representatives in Congress, added to the southern slave votes, to carry the measure. By this act two new territories were organized, Kansas and Nebraska. The inhabitants of each could choose for themselves whether slavery should exist or not, the general impression being that Kansas would finally adopt slavery, while Nebraska would ultimately become a free State, and thus the balance in the Senate would be maintained. But the Kansas-Nebraska Act contained a fatal defect. No provision was made as to the time when the settlers should decide upon their system of labor or as to the right of a majority to change the system formerly adopted by their opponents. Hence each side rushed settlers into Kansas in the endeavor to obtain immediate control of the government, or to wrest that control from those in temporary possession. Popular sovereignty thus applied soon ended in actual civil war, and the struggle which ensued arrayed North against South in almost complete estrangement. Had Douglas deliberately planned to plunge the nation into a fratricidal war, he could not have adopted a measure better fitted to accomplish that purpose than the repeal of the Missouri Compromise. EXTRACTS FROM THE KANSAS-NEBRASKA ACT Chap. LIX. An Act to Organize the Territories of Nebraska and Kansas. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa- tives of the United States of America in Congress assem- bled, That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the following limits, except such portions thereof as are hereinafter expressly exempted from the operations of this act, to wit: 10 beginning at a point in the Missouri River where the fortieth parallel of north latitude crosses the same; thence west on said parallel to the east boundary of the Territory of Utah, on the summit of the Rocky Mountains ; thence on said summit northward to the forty-ninth parallel of north latitude ; thence east on said parallel to the western boundary of the territory of Minnesota ; thence southward on said boundary to the Missouri River ; thence down the main channel of said river to the place of beginning, be, and the same 20 is hereby, created into a temporary government by the name of the Territory of Nebraska ; and when admitted as a State or States, the said territory, or any portion 151 152 EPOCH-MAKING PAPERS of the same, shall be received into the Union with or without slavery, as their constitution may prescribe at the time of their admission : Provided, That nothing in this act contained shall be construed to inhibit the government of the United States from dividing said Territory into two or more Territories, in such manner and at such times as Congress shall deem convenient and proper, or from attaching any portion of said Territory to any other State or Territory of the United io States: Provided further, That nothing in this act con- tained shall be construed to impair the rights of per- son or property now pertaining to the Indians in said Territory, so long as such rights shall remain unex- tinguished by treaty between the United States and such Indians, or to include any territory which, by treaty with any Indian tribe, is not, without the con- sent of said tribe, to be included within the territorial limits or jurisdiction of any State or Territory; but all such territory shall be excepted out of the boun- 20 daries and constitute no part of the Territory of Ne- braska, until said tribe shall signify their assent to the President of the United States to be included within the said Territory of Nebraska, or to affect the authority of the government of the United States to make any regulations respecting such Indians, their EXTRACTS FROM THE KANSAS-NEBRASKA ACT 153 lands, property, or other rights, by treaty, law, or otherwise, which it would have been competent to the government to make if this act had never passed. Section 10. And be it further enacted, That the provisions of the act entitled " An act respecting fugi- tives from justice, and persons escaping from the ser- vice of their masters," approved February twelfth, seventeen hundred and ninety-three, and the provisions of the act entitled " °An act to amend, and supplement- ary to, the aforesaid act," approved September eigh- 10 teenth, eighteen hundred and fifty, be, and the same are hereby, declared to extend to and be in full force within the limits of the said Territory of Nebraska. Section 14. And, be it further enacted, . . . That the Constitution, and all laws of the United States which are not locally inapplicable, shall have the same force and effect within the said Territory of Nebraska as elsewhere within the United States, except the eighth section of the °act preparatory to the admission of Missouri into the Union, approved 20 March sixth, eighteen hundred and twenty, which, being inconsistent with the principle of non-interven- tion by Congress with slavery in the States and Territories, as recognized by the legislation of eighteen hundred and fifty, commonly called the Compromise 154 EPOCH-MAKING PAPERS Measures, is hereby °declared inoperative and void; it being the true intent and meaning of this act not to legislate slavery into any Territory or State, nor to exclude it therefrom, ° but to leave the people thereof perfectly free to form and regulate their domestic institutions in their own way, subject only to the Constitution of the United States : Provided, That nothing herein contained shall be construed to revive or put in force any °law or regulation which may have existed prior to the act of sixth of March, eighteen hundred and twenty, either protecting, establishing, prohibiting, or abolishing slavery. Approved, May 30, 1854. Note. — The provisions relating to slavery in Kansas are contained in sections 19, 28, and 32, and, substituting the word Kansas for Nebraska, are identical with the sections printed above. THE DEED SCOTT DECISION Historical Note. — The political departments of the federal government had endeavored to solve the great problem of slav- ery in the territories by successive laws which, instead of end- ing, had increased the sectional strife. The judicial department finally essayed an attempt at settlement. Dred Scott, a negro, had been taken as a slave into the free State of Illinois and later to the Louisiana territory north of 36° 30', where, by the Missouri Compromise, slavery was for- bidden. After his return to Missouri he brought suit in the State courts to obtain his freedom, on the ground that he had become free by virtue of residence on free soil, and that once a free man his return to a slave state would not reduce him to bondage again. He lost his case on appeal to the highest Missouri court, and then brought another case before a circuit court of the United States. The circuit court allowed Scott to appear as a party to the suit, but decided that he had not gained his freedom by residence on free soil. An appeal was then taken to the Supreme Court of the United States, where the point involved in the appeal was decided against Dred Scott. This point was : had the circuit court any right to judge the case, since its jurisdiction was limited by the Constitution to the classes of persons mentioned in that document. The Supreme Court decided that a negro descended from a former slave could not be a citizen of a State, and hence was not entitled to appear before a federal court as a party to a suit. This was strictly all 155 156 EPOCH-MAKING PAPERS that was before the court for decision, but the majority of the judges, doubtless hoping that their action would settle once for all the great political question of slavery in the territories, and by so doing would remove the cause of a strife that threatened to disrupt the Union, concluded to add an opinion upon a point of law connected with, but not necessary to, the settlement of the case before them. Such an opinion was contrary to the well-established practice of the Supreme Court. Many able jurists have claimed that it was not an authoritative decision of the court. Chief Justice Taney, in this portion of his opinion, declared that the Missouri Compromise was opposed to the constitutional right of the slaveholder as the owner of property, recognized as such by the Constitution, to carry his kind of property, that is, his slaves, into any portion of the federal territory, and hence was null and void. By this decision the entire territory of the United States was opened to slavery, and not until a territory be- came a State could the right to hold slaves therein be denied to citizens of the slave States. The doctrine of popular sovereignty was destroyed, as well as the congressional power of control. A great moral question is never settled until it is settled right. As the people of the North very generally refused to recognize the decision as finally disposing of the question, the "irrepressible conflict" continued, until laws and judicial decisions alike were silenced in the clash of armed hosts. THE DRED SCOTT DECISION EXTRACTS FROM THE OPINION OF CHIEF JUSTICE TANEY °The Act of Congress, upon which the plaintiff relies, declares that slavery and involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime, shall be forever prohibited in all that part of the territory ceded by France, under the name of Louisiana, which lies north of thirty-six degrees thirty minutes north latitude, and not included within the limits of Missouri. And the 10 difficulty which meets us at the threshold of this part of the inquiry is, whether °Congress was authorized to pass this law under any of the powers granted to it by the Constitution; for if the authority is not given by that instrument, it is the duty of this Court to declare it void and inoperative, and incapable of con- ferring freedom upon any one who is held as a slave under the laws of any one of the States. The counsel for the plaintiff has laid much stress upon that °article in the Constitution which confers 20 on Congress the power " to dispose of and make all needful rules and regulations respecting the territory or other property belonging to the United States ; " but in the judgment of the Court, that provision has 157 158 EPOCH-MAKING PAPERS no bearing on the present controversy, and the power there given, whatever it may be, is confined, and was intended to be confined, to the territory which at that time belonged to, or was claimed by, the United States, and was within their boundaries as settled by the treaty with Great Britain, and can have no influence upon a territory afterwards acquired from a foreign government. It was a special provision for a known and particular territory, and to meet a present emer- io gency, and nothing more. . . . It was intended for a specific purpose, to provide for the things we have mentioned. It was to transfer to the new government the property then held in common by the States, and to give to that government power to apply it to the objects for which it had been destined by mutual agreement among the States before their league was dissolved. It applied only to the property which the States held in common at that time, and has no reference whatever to any territory or 20 other property which the new sovereignty might after- wards itself acquire. . . . At the time when the territory in question was obtained by cession from France, it contained no population fit to be associated together and admitted as a State ; and it therefore was absolutely necessary THE DEED SCOTT DECISION 159 to hold possession of it, as a territory belonging to the United States, until it was settled and inhabited by a civilized community capable of self-government, and in a condition to be admitted on equal terms with the other States as a member of the Union. But, as we have before said, it was acquired by the general gov- ernment, as the representative and trustee of the people of the United States, and it must therefore be held in that character for their common and equal benefit; for it was the people of the several States, 10 acting through their agent and representative, the Federal Government, who in fact acquired the terri- tory in question, and the government holds it for their common use until it shall be associated with the other states as a member of the Union. But until that time arrives, it is undoubtedly neces- sary that some government should be established, in order to organize society, and to protect the inhabit- ants in their persons and property; and as people of the United States could act in this matter only through 20 the government which represented them, and through which they spoke and acted when the territory was ob- tained, it was not only within the scope of its powers, but it was its duty to pass such laws and establish such a government as would enable those by whose authority 160 EPOCH-MAKING PAPERS they acted to reap the advantages anticipated from its acquisition, and to gather there a population which would enable it to assume the position to which it was destined among the States of the Union. . . . But the power of Congress over the person or prop- erty of a citizen can never be a mere discretionary power under our constitution and form of government. The powers of the government and the rights and privileges of the citizen are regulated and plainly io defined by the constitution itself. . . . Thus the rights of property are united with the rights of person, and placed on the same ground by the fifth amend- ment to the constitution, which provides, that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, and property without due process of law. And an act of Congress which deprives a citizen of the United States of his liberty or property, merely because he came himself or brought his property into a particular territory of the United States, and who had committed no offense 20 against the laws, could hardly be dignified with the name of due process of law. . . . The powers of the government, and the rights of the citizen under it, are positive and practical regulations plainly written down. The people of the United States have delegated to it certain enumerated THE DRED SCOTT DECISION 161 powers, and °forbidden it to exercise others. It has no power over the person or property of a citizen but what the citizens of the United States have granted. And no laws or usages of other nations, or reasoning of statesmen or jurists upon the relation of master and slave, can enlarge the powers of the government, or take from the citizens the rights they have reserved. And if the constitution recognizes the right of property of the master in the slave, and makes no distinction between that description of 10 property and other property owned by a citizen, no tribunal, acting under the authority of the United States, whether it be legislative, executive, or judicial, has a right to draw such a distinction, or deny to it the benefit of the provisions and guarantees which have been provided for the protection of private property against the encroachments of the govern- ment. Now, as we have already said in an earlier part of this opinion, upon a different point, the right of prop- 20 erty in a slave is distinctly Expressed and affirmed in the Constitution. The right to °traffic in it, like an ordinary article of merchandise and property, was guaranteed to the citizens of the United States, in every State that might desire it, for twenty years. 162 EPOCH-MAKING PAPERS And the government in express terms is pledged to protect it in all future time, if the slave °escape from his owner. This is done in plain words — too plain to be misunderstood. And no word can be found in the Constitution which gives Congress a greater power over slave property, or which entitles property of that kind to °less protection than property of any other description. The only power conferred is the power coupled with the duty of guarding and io protecting the owner in his rights. Upon these considerations, it is the opinion of the Court that the Act of Congress which prohibited a citizen from holding and owning property of this kind in the territory of the United States north of the line therein mentioned, is not warranted by the Constitution, and is therefore void ; and that neither Dred Scott himself, nor any of his family, were made free by being carried into this territory : even if they had been carried there by the owner, with the inten- 20 tion of becoming a permanent resident. . . . THE PROCLAMATION OF EMANCIPATION Historical Note. — The Republican party, although it had been elected on the issue of opposition to further extension of slavery, was nevertheless not an abolition party, and Lincoln unquestionably expressed his own honest opinion and that of his party when he stated that the war was being waged to pre- serve the Union, and not to change the institutions of any sec- tion. Policy doubtless confirmed this conviction in Lincoln's mind, as he wished to do nothing to estrange the border slave- holding States, on whose loyalty to the Union cause depended the issue of the war. But as the war progressed many became convinced that slavery as well as Union was the issue of the conflict. The Confiscation Act of August 6, 1861, is the first of a series of governmental measures which reflected this changed attitude of the North, and led logically to the Proclamation of Emancipation. By this law slaves, bearing arms against the United States, or assisting by their labor in the construction of works of a military character, were to be considered as no longer the property of their former masters. On the 6th of March, 1862, President Lincoln, in a message to Congress, rec- ommended that an agreement be entered into with the loyal slave States whereby those States should emancipate their slaves and the United States should compensate the slave owners. The border States were unwilling to accede to this 163 164 EPOCH-MAKING PAPERS agreement. In April, 1802, slavery was abolished in the Dis- trict of Columbia. In June of the same year Congress passed a law prohibiting slavery in the territories of the United States. In the middle of July a second Confiscation Act was passed, freeing the slaves of rebels and traitors found or coming within the Union lines, and on the 21st of July, 1862, Lincoln read to his cabinet the first draft of the Proclamation of Emancipation. The fear that, in the face of military reverses, the Proclamation might seem to the country at large a measure of desperation, induced Lincoln to delay its promulgation until a Union victory should be won. The battle of Antietam, of September 17th, served Lincoln's purpose, and on the 22d of September, 1802, he issued the preliminary Proclamation of Emancipation which was to be enforced on and after January 1, 1803, as to all States or portions of States then in rebellion. On January 1, 1803, the famous document was promulgated by Lincoln, by virtue of the war power vested in him as com- mander-in-chief of the army and navy. Under its provision all slaves were emancipated in States or sections of States then in rebellion against the United States. Practically, the Procla- mation could be enforced only where the federal troops were in actual occupation of southern territory. Slavery still remained legal in the loyal border States, and was not finally abolished everywhere in the United States until the passage of the thirteenth amendment to the Constitution. THE PROCLAMATION OF EMANCIPATION Whereas, on the twenty -second day of September, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-two. a proclamation was issued by the President of the United States, containing, among other things, the following, to wit : " That on the first clay of January, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-three, all persons held as slaves within any state or desig- nated part of a state, the people whereof shall then be 10 in rebellion against the United States, shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free; and the executive government of the United States, including the mili- tary and naval authority thereof, will recognize and maintain the freedom of such persons, and will do no act or acts to repress such persons or any of them, in any efforts they may make for their actual freedom. " That the Executive will, on the first day of Janu- ary aforesaid, by proclamation, designate the states 20 and parts of states, if any, in which the people thereof respectively shall then be in rebellion against the United States; and the fact that any state, or the people thereof, shall on that day be in good faith 165 166 EPOCH-MAKING PAPERS represented in the Congress of the United States, by members chosen thereto at elections wherein a major- ity of the qualified voters of such state shall have participated, shall, in the absence of strong counter- vailing testimony, be deemed conclusive evidence that such state, and the people thereof, are not then in rebellion against the United States." Now, therefore, I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, by virtue of the power in me vested io as °Commander-in-Chief of the army and navy of the United States in time of actual armed rebellion against the authority and government of the United States, and as a fit and necessary war measure for suppressing said rebellion, do, on this first day of January, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-three, and in accordance with my purpose so to do, publicly proclaimed for the full period of one hun- dred days from the day first above mentioned, order and designate, as the states and parts of states wherein 20 the people thereof respectively are this day in rebellion against the United States, the following, to wit : Arkansas, Texas, Louisiana °(except the parishes of St. Bernard, Plaquemines, Jefferson, St. John, St. Charles, St. James, Ascension, Assumption, Terre Bonne, Lafourche, Ste. Marie, St. Martin, and Orleans, THE PROCLAMATION OF EMANCIPATION 167 including the city of New Orleans), Mississippi, Ala- bama, Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, North Caro- lina, and Virginia (except the forty-eight counties designated as West Virginia, and also the counties of Berkely, Accomac, Northampton, Elizabeth City, York, Princess Anne, and Norfolk, including the cities of Norfolk and Portsmouth), and which excepted parts are for the present left precisely as if this proclamation were not issued. And, by virtue of the power and for the purpose 10 aforesaid, I do order and declare that all persons held as slaves °within said designated states and parts of states are and henceforward shall be free ; and that the executive government of the United States, in- cluding the military and naval authorities thereof, will recognize and maintain the freedom of said persons. And I hereby enjoin upon the people so declared to be free, to abstain from all violence, unless in neces- sary self-defense ; and I recommend to them that in all cases, when allowed, they labor faithfully for 20 reasonable wages. °And I further declare and make known that such persons of suitable condition will be received into the armed service of the United States, to garrison forts, positions, stations, and other places, and to man vessels of all sorts in said service. 168 EPOCH-MAKING PAPERS And upon this act, sincerely believed to be an act of justice, warranted by the Constitution, upon mili- tary necessity, I invoke the considerate judgment of mankind and the gracious favor of Almighty God. In testimony whereof, I have hereunto set my name, and caused the seal of the United States to be affixed. Done at the city of Washington, this first day of January, in the year of our Lord one thou- sand eight hundred and sixty-three, and of [o [l.s.] the Independence of the United States the eighty-seventh. ABRAHAM LINCOLN. By the President : William H. Seward, Secretary of State. THE GETTYSBURG SPEECH Historical Note. — The battle of Gettysburg, fought on the 1st, 2d, and 3d of July, 1863, was one of the greatest and most decisive conflicts of the Civil War. Lee's invasion of the North was stopped, and the southern armies were compelled to fight thereafter on the defensive. The victory of Gettysburg marked the turning-point of the Rebellion. It made the ulti- mate victory of the Union cause almost a certainty, and al- though the South struggled bravely on for nearly two years longer, the death knell of the Confederacy was struck. The governors of the several States whose volunteers had fought in the battle of Gettysburg had, under the leadership of Governor Curtin of Pennsylvania, secured a portion of the battlefield as a place of permanent interment for those who had fallen in the battle. These governors united in inviting Presi- dent Lincoln to dedicate the burial place as a national cemetery on the 19th of November, 1863. Edward Everett of Massachusetts was the orator of the dedi- catory services. His speech of two hours' duration was a dig- nified, chaste, and eloquent effort, worthy in every way of the occasion and secure of a permanent place as a classic of English oratory. Lincoln dedicated the cemetery in an address of two hundred and sixty-six words, which will remain, as long as the English language endures, one of its most remarkable examples 169 170 EPOCH-MAKING PAPERS of purity of diction, eloquence of expression, and elevation of thought. To the loyal Americans, engaged in that mighty national struggle, it was more than a specimen of oratory of un- surpassed merit. It was the expression of the deepest feelings of a great nation endeavoring, at an unparalleled expenditure of blood and treasure, to accomplish the ends Lincoln so clearly and forcefully stated. ADDRESS DELIVERED AT THE DEDICATION OF THE CEMETERY AT GETTYSBURG Fourscore and seven years ago our fathers brought forth upon this continent, a new nation, conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that °all men are created equal. Now we are engaged in a great civil war, °testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battle-field of that war. We have io come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting-place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this. But, in a larger sense, we cannot dedicate — we cannot consecrate — we can- not hallow — this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here have consecrated it, far above our power to add or detract. The world will THE GETTYSBURG SPEECH 111 little note, nor long remember, what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here, to the unfin- ished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us, — that from these honored dead we take increased devo- tion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion — that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain — that this 10 nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom — and that government of the people, by the people, and for the people, shall not perish from the earth. ABRAHAM LINCOLN. November 19, 1863. NOTES Page 3, line 6. Inalienable rights. The doctrine of in- herent or inalienable rights was developed historically npon American soil. It has been customary to ascribe its adoption in the revolutionary constitutions to the influence of Rousseau. But the Separatists in England and Roger Williams in America first made practical application of the theory, and during the later colonial period it was often invoked to protect the colonists against arbitrary acts of the British government. Line 12. The right of revolution. The so-called right of revolution has been acted on several times in English history, notably in the Revolution of 1G88. It has been generally ac- cepted by American statesmen and jurists. See Webster's " Reply to Hayne." Page 4, line 10. Veto. The king had the right to veto the acts of colonial legislatures in all the colonies except Rhode Island and Connecticut. Line 12. Reservation for the king's pleasure. Instructions to the royal governors in certain colonies had commanded that legislative acts should be reserved for the king's assent, and that they should not become laws until signed by him. 173 174 NOTES Page 5, line 1. Representative houses dissolved. E.g. in Massachusetts. Page 5, line 6. Legislation by the people. The principle is here enunciated that the colony had an inalienable right to make laws for its own government. A legislature was simply a convenient means of accomplishing that end. If the legislature were abolished, the right to legislate remained unimpaired in the people, the creators of the legislature. Line 18. Judges dependent on the crown. The early colonial practice had been for judges to hold office during good behavior, which was virtually life tenure. A royal order mak- ing all colonial judgeships revocable at the king's pleasure had brought about a struggle which lasted from the middle of the eighteenth century to the Revolution. A number of colonial laws, fixing tenure for good behavior, were disallowed by the crown, and in 1762 Governor Hardy of New Jersey was removed from office because he had appointed a judge during good behavior instead of at the king's pleasure. The British government in a recent order had directed that colonial judges should be paid out of the imperial treasury, thus freeing them entirely from colonial control. Line 21. Erection of new offices. There is little evidence that the creation of new offices was in excess of the needs of administration. Line 24. Quartering of soldiers. Soldiers were quartered in Boston under the so-called Quartering Act of the British Parliament. NOTES 175 Page 6, line 3. Parliamentary control. This clause reflects the views of a strong party in the colonies which claimed that the government of the colonies was vested in the crown and the colonial legislatures, denying to Parliament the right to pass laws except for imperial interests. Page 6, line 5. Assent to legislation. The Declaration as- sumed that the king still possessed the power to veto acts of the British Parliament. As a matter of fact, he was responsible for the laws enumerated, not because he had assented to them, he had no power to do otherwise after the acts had passed, but be- cause he had used the parliamentary party, which he had built up, to pass them. The veto was last used by the British crown in 1707. Line 0. Military trials. Soldiers are by the military laws of most nations subject to trial in military, not in civil courts. Line 12. Restriction of trade. The " Navigation Acts " had applied the policy of the closed door to the colonies. England's policy was to control colonial trade for the benefit of the English merchant, and the economic interests of the colonists were sac- rificed if they conflicted with the supposed interests of England. The Boston Port Act of 1774 had closed that port to the trade of the world. Line 13. Taxation without consent. E.g. the Stamp and Tea Acts. Line 14. Denial of jury trial. Trial in vice-admiralty courts had been substituted for jury trial in certain cases. Line 16. Trial in England. The burning of the Gaspee led the British government to issue instructions, dated September 176 NOTES ate 4, 1772, to a commission of inquiry appointed to investigate the affair, to arrest and send the offenders to England for trial, thus violating one of the most prized rights of Englishmen. Line 18. The Quebec Act. This act was intended by -the British government to grant such liberal privileges to tbe French Catholics of Quebec that they would remain loyal to England. It was a constitution for the Province of Quebec, which granted to the French inhabitants their French civil law and the free exercise of their religion. It, moreover, added to the Provinces of Quebec the territory between the Ohio and Mississippi rivers and the Great Lakes. * Line 23. Charters revoked. As in Massachusetts by the Act of 1774. Page 7, line 1. Legislatures dissolved. As in Massachusetts, New York, Maryland, Virginia, and Georgia. Page 7, line 9. Foreign mercenaries. Not all the mercena- ries were Hessians, but all were so called by the colonists. Several German princelings sold their subjects at a fixed sum per head to the king of Great Britain for use as soldiers in America. The use of Hessians exasperated the Americans as almost nothing else did. It decided many who had been waver- ers to support the cause of independence. Line 23. Petitions for redress. E.g. the petitions of the Stamp Act Congress and of the First Continental Congress of October 25, 1774, and the Olive Branch Petition of July, 1775. Page 8, line 5. Warnings to British people. E.g. the Decla- ration of Rights of 1774 by the First Continental Congress. NOTES 177 Line 18. Independence declared. The concluding paragraph is, strictly speaking, the declaration of independence ; the pre- ceding portions of the document give the reasons for the mo- mentous step. Page 13, line 6. Adoption by States. It is important to remember that the Articles of Confederation were adopted by the several States, and not by the people of the United States. Compare the enacting clause of the Constitution. Line 11. Confederacy. A confederacy or confederation is a union of States in which the central government is given less power than in a federation. It is a union of sovereign States rather than a single sovereign State formed by the union of a number of component self-governing divisions, each of which by the act of union loses its real independence. A confederation exercises its jurisdiction only over the States, not over the indi- viduals inhabiting the States. Page 14, line 3. Citizens entitled to privileges and immuni- ties of the several States. This provision is repeated in nearly the same words in the Constitution, Art. IV, Sec. 2, § 1. Line 19. Extradition. The Constitution follows closely the language of this clause for the extradition of criminals. See Constitution, Art, IV, Sec. 2, § 2. Page 15, line 1, Mutual recognition of legal acts of the several States. See Constitution, Art IV, Sec. 1. Line 4. Congress. As constituted by this article, Congress partook more of the nature of a diet of ambassadors from sovereign States than of a national legislative body. Before N 178 NOTES the American Union the word "congress" was not used as a name for a legislature. It was commonly employed to designate a meeting of diplomats in an international conference, as the Congress of Vienna, and in this sense it was used in the First and Second Continental Congresses. The Second Continental Con- gress found itself the only body capable of carrying on the Revo- lution, and by its assumption of legislative powers the word came to be used in this country for a national legislature. Line 16. Congressmen not to hold office. See Art. I, Sec. 6, § 2, of the Constitution, where the provision is repeated. Page 16, line 1. Privileges of Congressmen. Freedom of debate and immunity from arrests, with the exceptions stated in the text, had been won in English and colonial legislatures, and were recognized as absolutely essential to the proper trans- action of legislative business. See Art. I, Sec. 6, § 1, of the Constitution. Line 8. State treaty-making power. The control of foreign affairs is the department most often given to the central govern- ment, even in very loose confederations. See Constitution, Art. I, Sec. 10, § 1. Line 12. Foreign influence guarded against. There was a great and not unfounded fear of foreign influence in American affairs down to the close of the War of 1812. See Constitution, Art. I, Sec. 9, § 8. Line 10. Titles of nobility. See Constitution, Art. I. Sec. 9, § 8, and Art. I, Sec. 10, § 1. Line 19. Alliances between States. See Constitution, Art. I, Sec. 10, § 3. NOTES 179 Page 17, line 6. State troops and navies. See Constitu- tion, Art. I, Sec. 10, § 3, and Art. II of Amendments. Page 18, line 16. Officers for State contingents in the army. See Constitution, Art. I, Sec. 8, § 16. While Congress, under the Constitution, has the power to vest the appointment of offi- cers of a rank lower than colonel in the President when State troops are called into the national service as volunteers, the general practice has been in conformity with this rule of the Articles of Confederation. Line 23. No Confederate power of taxation. No power of taxation, direct or indirect, was given to Congress. By this article the national government was made entirely dependent upon the State for its revenue. This was the most fatal defect of the Articles of Confederation. There was no power given to Congress to enforce payment of the requisitions, and a num- ber of States failed to pay the amounts assessed upon them by Congress. Page 10, line 13. General powers of Congress. The powers granted Congress were in general those which had been exer- cised by the British government in the later colonial period. Page 20, line 3. Letters of marque and reprisal. Letters of marque and reprisal are commissions issued to privateers allow- ing them to capture vessels on the high seas. They are no longer issued in time of peace, and privateering has been virtually abol- ished by the practice of nations. Line 4. Admiralty courts. Admiralty courts were the only regular courts established by the Articles of Confederation. 180 NOTES Cases arising on the high seas had been, during the colonial period, tried in British or imperial courts, and, as there were no State courts for this purpose, Congress was allowed to create them. The lack of a national judiciary was one of the chief defects of the Articles of Confederation. Line 10. Disputes between States. Compare this very re- stricted grant of power to settle disputes with that given to the judiciary under the Constitution. See Constitution, Art. Ill, Sec. 2, §§ 1, 2. Page 22, line 15. Private land claims. The kings of Eng- land, in their grants of land in America, had been very careless in regranting territory already bestowed in previous charters, thus giving rise to many controversies in the colonial period and making titles to land, in the disputed district, uncertain and insecure in the period after America became an independent nation. The meaning of this clause is, that Congress, upon request, shall decide controversies concerning private ownership of land in a district which had been definitely decided to belong to a certain State, but which, before such decision, was claimed by two or more States, where the claim or claims to the land in question arose out of a grant or grants made before the final adjustment of jurisdiction. Page 23, line 1. Special grants of power to Congress. Com- pare carefully the powers vested in this and the succeeding paragraph with those given to Congress under the Constitution. See Constitution, Art. I, Sec. 8. Line 25. Civil officers. Note that the civil officers appointed by Congress under the Articles are simply clerks of Congress. They do not constitute an executive department. NOTES 181 Page 24, line 4. President of Congress. Not president of the United States. Page 25, line 25. Majority of nine States. The require- ment that a majority of nine out of the thirteen States was necessary for the really important business, was a most unwise provision, as it frequently prevented the passage of measures essential to the well-being of the country, which were favored by a majority of the States. As it often happened that the rep- resentatives of several of the States were absent from Congress, it was possible for one or two States to block measures desired by all the others. The provision was one of the chief causes of the inefficiency of the Congress as a legislative body. Page 28, line 20. Committee of the States. The limited power granted by the Articles and by Congress to this Commit- tee of the States, prevented it from ever becoming an important factor in the government. Page 27, line 5. Admission of Canada. One of the delu- sions of the revolutionary statesmen was that the French of Canada, so recently conquered by Great Britain, would welcome the opportunity to free themselves from the rule of England. Page 28, line 3. Amendment of the Articles. The require- ment of unanimous consent for amendment makes it practically impossible to change a constitution by legal means. This clause was the immediate cause of the destruction of the Confedera- tion. Page 34, line 11. Inheritance of property. This careful pro- vision against hereditary entailed estates was inserted to pre- 182 NOTES vent the growth of a landed aristocracy. It secured the surest foundation for a social as well as a political democracy, by in- suring the ownership of land in numerous hands. Page 36, line 1. Three departments of government. The Ordinance provided for the division of the powers of govern- ment into three departments ; executive, legislative, and judicial. It was closely modelled after the governments of the colonies, and proved successful largely because its main provisions had been tested by colonial experience, and had been found adapted to the free government of a new country. The territories were in reality colonies. The use of the word "territory," rather than " colony," has caused many to lose sight of the fact that the United States has been the most successful colonizing power in history. Line 6. Property qualifications. Property qualifications for voting and office holding had been the rule during the later colo- nial period. Line 21. Common law jurisdiction. Common law jurisdic- tion was such jurisdiction as the law courts of the original States possessed in both civil and criminal matters. It was based upon the English common law, which was adopted as the legal system of the colonies, and which is to-day the legal system of every State in the Union except Louisiana, where French law still obtains. Page 37, line 17. Local government. The Ordinance very wisely allowed the territorial legislatures to finally determine the permanent form of local government in town and county, which should be best suited to the needs and habits of the peo- NOTES 183 pie : an act of wisdom, which has contributed not a little to the success of our system of territorial government. Page 39, line 19. Legislative council. The appointive legis- lative council was one of the few unsuccessful features of the Ordinance. The opposition to it led to a permanent change in our territorial legislatures, whereby the upper house became an elective body. Page 42, line 13. Bill of Rights. A comprehensive bill of rights. With the exception of the provision concerning pro- portionate representation in the legislature, the second article deals with civil rights, and may be said to sum up the results of over a thousand years of struggle on the part of the English race for security of life and property against arbitrary and despotic government. It is an epitome of the great charters of English liberty. Compare carefully with the first eight amend- ments to the Constitution. Line 15. Habeas Corpus. The writ of habeas corpus is one of the most important securities of personal liberty. By means of this writ iirbitrary imprisonment is rendered impossible and an immediate hearing is insured to any person under arrest. Page 43, line 3. Obligations of contracts. The constitution still further secures the inviolability of contracts by forbidding any State to pass a law impairing the obligation of contracts. See Constitution, Art. I, Sec. 10, § 1. Line 11. Public education. A recognition that the education of the citizen is a duty of the State. In carrying out this, the States, into which the Northwest Territory was divided, have 184 NOTES not only cared zealously for primary and secondary education, but have established great universities wholly maintained by the States. Page 45, line 6. States formed from the Northwest Territory. The five States of Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, and Wis- consin were admitted to the Union from the Northwest Terri- tory, from which was also taken a portion of the State of Min- nesota. Page 4G, line 7. States to be formed from the Northwest Territory. There was a grave constitutional question whether Congress, under the Articles of Confederation, had any authority to bind the States to this compact, and especially to admit new States to the Union on a perfect equality with the old. Under the Articles, Congress could only exercise the powers expressly conferred upon it, and no such power had been granted. To avoid this difficulty, Congress, under the Constitution, at its first session, reenacted the Ordinance of 1787. Line 21. Slavery prohibited. The article prohibiting slavery was the most remarkable one of this great document. A simi- lar provision in the Ordinance of 1784 had been rejected by Congress. The clause was not added until almost the last mo- ment, as up to that time the friends of the measure had seen no hope of its passage. By securing this imperial domain for free labor, the ultimate extinction of slavery on the continent of North America was assured. Line 25. Fugitive slave clause. Compare the Constitu- NOTES 185 Page 51, line 1. Title of the Constitution. The title does not appear in the original manuscript. Line 3. Preamble. The preamble to the Constitution de- termines the great question as to where sovereignty lies in the United States. In any State the person or body of persons that can enact fundamental law is the sovereign, " We, the people of the United States, ... do ordain and establish this con- stitution.' ' Hence the people are sovereign in the United States. Neither the States nor the federal government are sov- ereign ; they are the agents of the sovereign people for the work of government. Page 51, line 12. Legislative, executive, and judicial de- partments. See also Art. II, Sec. 1, § 1, and Art. Ill, Sec. 1. These three clauses taken together determine the division of government into three coordinate departments, and that each shall be supreme and independent within the limits of the au- thority granted it by the Constitution. No one of the depart- ments can rightfully encroach upon the sphere of governmental action allotted to the others. Line 18. State control of the elective franchise. Modi- fied by the Fourteenth Amendment. See Art. XIV, Sec. 2, of amendments. Line 19. Qualification for voting. The Constitution leaves to the States the sole power to determine the qualifications for voting. The Fourteenth Amendment forbids discrimination on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude, but with that limitation, the State can extend or narrow the elective franchise as much as it judges proper. Some States allow 186 NOTES women to vote, some permit aliens to vote, while some require a property or educational qualification. Page 52, line 5. Basis of representation. Changed by the Fourteenth Amendment, Sec. 2. Line 18. Apportionment of representatives. A census was taken in 1790, upon the basis of which the temporary apportion- ment, as provided in this clause, was superseded by one based upon the enumeration of that year. Page 53, line 3. Choose. The spelling of this word in the original was chuse. Page 54, line 12. Impeachment. When trying impeach- ments the Senate is not a legislative but a judicial body, a court which must decide cases upon the evidence submitted and by the law involved. Questions of policy and of politics which may determine the action of the senator as a legislator have, of right, no influence when the senator acts as a judge. Page 55, line 4. Time for holding elections. By federal law elections are held on the Tuesday following the first Monday of November in even years. Line 7. Sessions of Congress. Each Congress has two ses- sions. The long session lasts from the first Monday of Decem- ber, of the year following the election, to June, July, or August. The short session begins the first Monday of the succeeding December and ends on the 4th of March. Page 57, line 2. Initiation of money bills. The House of Representatives has successfully asserted its right to originate appropriation as well as revenue-raising bills, following the practice of English parliamentary bodies. NOTES 187 Page 58, line 15. General welfare clause. The so-called "general welfare-' clause is one of the most frequently mis- understood clauses of the Constitution. It does not give Congress power to provide for the general welfare ; on the contrary, it is a limitation of the power of taxation. Its true meaning is that taxation cannot be imposed for private or sec- tional ends, hut only for the general welfare of the whole United States. Page 60, line 17. Implied powers. The doctrine of implied pow T ers derives its chief sanction from this clause. This doc- trine means, the right of Congress to exercise a certain power having been ascertained, that Congress may use any methods, means, or agency for giving effect to such power which it, in its discretion, deems wise and needful, provided such use be not forbidden by the Constitution itself. Line 24. Importation of slaves. A temporary provision which, by its own terms, lapsed after 1807. Page 61, line 5. Habeas Corpus. See note on the writ of habeas corpus, page 42, line 15. Line 8. Bill of attainder. A bill of attainder is a legisla- tive measure, making an accusation of crime, and upon its pas- sage carrying the penalty of death and forfeiture of property. No legal trial of the accused is permitted, and the legislature acts as a political body, not as a court. The bill passes like any other legislative enactment. Its use was denied both to Con- gress and to the State legislatures in order that the individual might be protected against the malice of a party or the tyranny of a majority. 188 NOTES Line 8. Ex post facto laws. An ex post facto law, which both State and nation were forbidden to pass, is, in general, any retroactive law. Under the Constitution it applies only to criminal law. It is a law which punishes, as a crime, an act that was not a crime at the time of its commission, or which imposes a heavier penalty than the penalty that was legal at the time of commission of the crime. Line 10. Capitation tax. A capitation tax is a poll tax. Page 62, line 21. Control. The spelling of this word in the original manuscript was controul. Page 63, line 5. Grant of executive power. Note the differ- ence between the grants of executive and legislative power : " The executive power shall be vested in a President." "All legislative powers, herein granted, shall be vested in a Con- gress." While Congress can exercise only those powers granted, the President has discretionary power to perform any executive act not forbidden by the Constitution. He cannot delegate this power to any other department of government or permit any other department to assume executive functions. Line 17. Election of President. This clause has been amended by the twelfth article of the amendments. Page 65, line 14. Succession to the office of President. For- merly the President pro tempore of the Senate succeeded to the powers and duties of President of the United States upon the death or disability of both the President and Vice-President. By the Act of 1886 Congress assigned the succession to mem- bers of the cabinet in the order of the creation of the execu- NOTES 189 tive departments over which they preside, viz., Secretary of State, Secretary of the Treasury, Attorney General, Secretary of War, etc. Line 18. Increased. The spelling of this word in the original manuscript was encreased. Page 66, line 16. Treaty-making power of the Senate. The power of the Senate in treaty-making is not limited to the acceptance or rejection of treaties submitted by the President. It can make suggestions and advise the President during the progress of negotiations as well as freely amend a proposed treaty after its submission to the Senate by the executive. Page 68, line 7. Tenure of office for judges. Tenure during good behavior is virtually tenure for life. A federal judge can be dismissed only by the process of impeachment. Page 69, line 7. Jurisdiction of federal courts assigned by Congress. All federal courts, except the Supreme Court, are created by Congress and can be abolished by the same authority. Congress also assigns to each court the kind of judicial work it shall do, except that original jurisdiction, in the cases mentioned in this paragraph, is given to the Supreme Court by the Consti- tution, and cannot be taken from it by Congress. Page 70, line 18. The fugitive slave clause. Abrogated by the Thirteenth Amendment. Page 71, line 17. Republican form of government. A re- publican form of government is a government by representa- tives chosen by the people. 190 NOTES Page 72, line 12. Amendment prior to 1808. A temporary- provision which by its own terms lapsed after 1807. Line 16. The State indestructible. As it is not conceivable that any State would ever consent to its own exclusion from the Senate, this clause is virtually the one non-amendable feature of the Constitution. It guarantees the permanence of the federal form of government. Without this provision securing the integrity and equality of the several States the Constitution could never have been adopted. This provision makes the United States "An indestructible Union of indestructible States." Page 76, line 1. Title to the first ten amendments. In the joint resolution of Congress, submitting the first ten amend- ments to the people, the following explanatory heading is found ; it is not a part of the Constitution, although generally printed with it: "Articles in addition to and amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, proposed by Congress, and ratified by the Legislatures of the several States, pursuant to the fifth Article of the original Constitution." Line 2. Amendments not numbered. In the original manu- scripts the first twelve amendments were not numbered. Line 3. A federal bill of rights. The first ten amendments constitute a federal bill of rights. It is important to remem- ber that they impose restrictions on the federal government alone and not on the States. Their purpose was to secure the individual against any infringement of his rights by the fed- eral government. For example : Congress cannot establish any national church, but as far as the federal Constitution is con- NOTES 191 cerned a State may make a particular church the State church. Several States retained established churches for many years after the adoption of the Constitution. Page 78, line 16. Date of first ten amendments. The amend- ments were in force from November 3, 1791. Line 21. Date of Eleventh Amendment. The Eleventh Amendment was proclaimed January 8, 1798. Page 79, line 4. Date of Twelfth Amendment. The Twelfth Amendment was declared in force September 25, 1804. Line 5. Necessity for the Twelfth Amendment. The Twelfth Amendment was made necessary to avoid a recurrence of the deadlock which occurred in the presidential election of 1800, when Jefferson and Burr each received the same number of electoral votes, although Burr was in reality the candidate for Vice-President. Line 19. Defect of the Twelfth Amendment. The amend- ment was defective in that it did not expressly state by whom the electoral vote should be counted. This defect led to the Hayes-Tilden contested election of 1876, which was only settled by an extra-constitutional electoral commission. Page 81, line 1. Date of and necessity for the Thirteenth Amendment. The Thirteenth Amendment was declared in force December 18, 1865. The Emancipation Proclamation was a war measure, and applied only to States and districts that were in rebellion. The amendment was necessary to abolish slavery in States and districts which were not in rebellion. 192 NOTES ««4- Line 9. Date and purpose of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Fourteenth Amendment was declared in force July 28, 1808. Its chief political purpose was to confer citizenship upon the recently emancipated negroes, and to protect them against unfair State legislation. Page 82, line 22. Political disabilities. The "General Amnesty Act" of May 22, 1872, removed these political disa- bilities for all except those who had served in the Confeder- acy after having held certain federal offices. Page 83, line 12. Date and purpose of the Fifteenth Amend- ment. The Fifteenth Amendment was declared in force March 30, 1870. Its purpose was to secure to the freedmen equal rights with the whites in voting. Page 87, line 15. Organization of government during Wash- ington's Administration. The Constitution was a mere frame- work of government. It was the great work of Washington's administration to add flesh and blood to this skeleton and make it a living organism. This was done by creating exec- utive departments, by organizing a complete system of federal courts, by providing revenue ample for the needs of government, by chartering the United States Bank, by funding the national debt, and by determining the mutual relations of the three great departments on principles that secured both their effi- ciency and independence. Page 90, line 7. Danger of disunion. The emphasis laid upon, and the space given in the Farewell Address to the neces- sity for union in order to counteract the forces of sectionalism, show that Washington clearly foresaw that the tendency to dis- NOTES 193 union would prove to be the greatest danger to the life of the nation, Compare this portion of Washington's Address with the famous peroration of Webster's " Reply to Hayne." Line 25. Palladium. The Palladium was a statue of the goddess Pallas, on the preservation of which depended the safety of ancient Troy ; hence it has come to mean something that affords complete protection and safety. Page 92. line 3. Economic advantages of union. Wash- ington's statesmanship was of the eminently practical kincf. He fully appreciated the fact that the economic advantages of union would, in the end, weigh more in the minds of the peo- ple than, any sentimental or theoretical attachment to the idea of union. Page 95, line 13. Spanish Treaty of 1795. The Treaty of 1795 with Spain secured to our citizens the right of free navi- gation of the Mississippi, the denial of which, in an earlier pro- posed treaty with Spain, had led the inhabitants of the western country to threaten separation from the original States and the formation of an independent nation. Line 20. The Jay Treaty. The Jay Treaty of 1795, among other provisions, contained one of especial value to the West, viz., the evacuation of the "Western Ports," which had been retained by Great Britain, notwithstanding the Treaty of 1783. Page 97, line 8. Political associations. Washington meant such associations as the Democratic clubs which had been formed, many of them by the French minister, Genet, in imita- tion of the Jacobin Club of France. He had declared against 194 NOTES such organizations in his message to Congress of November 19, 1794, and he feared that they might prove as dangerous to law and good government in this country as their prototypes had in France. Page 99, line 16. Party government. Washington had hoped to rule as a man above parties, choosing the best men of each party as his heads of departments, and availing himself of the best skill and wisdom to be obtained. Even he was obliged to reby more and more upon those who believed, in the main, as he did, and his successors have all frankly accepted party government as a necessity. Many of the evils which Washing- ton warned against have, however, constantly manifested them- selves in our party system. Page 101, line 24. Threefold division of the powers of gov- ernment. It was a fundamental principle of the statesman of the revolutionary period that government should be divided into three departments, and that despotism could only be avoided by preventing any one department from absorbing the powers of either or both of the other departments. Page 104, line 22. Unpopular taxation. This reference to " inconvenient and unpleasant " taxation was doubtless inspired by the " Whiskey Insurrection" of 1794. Page 105, line 12. Foreign policy based on justice. Compare the recent statement of the present Secretary of State, Mr. Hay, that the two permanent rules of American foreign policy are the Golden Rule and the Monroe Doctrine. Page 108, line 3. Fear of foreign influence. Washington had good reason to fear foreign influence. America had not as yet NOTES 195 shaken off its colonial attitude of mind. Throughout his ad- ministration nearly all men ranged themselves on one side or the other, as either British or French partisans. Page 112, line 11. Proclamation of neutrality. Washing- ton's Neutrality Proclamation of April 22, 1793, was one of the most important papers ever issued by a President of the United States. The Treaty of 1778 with France had bound the United States to defend the colonies of France when that country should be engaged in a defensive war. On the outbreak of war be- tween Great Britain and France, Washington decided that we were not bound to engage in it as an ally of France, as he did not believe the war to be, on the part of France, a defensive one, and so issued the Proclamation of Neutrality, the main idea of which, non-entanglement in European affairs, has been the keynote of our foreign policy. Page 117, line 10. Territorial limits of Missouri. The terri- tory of Missouri included all that portion of the Louisiana Pur- chase which lay to the north of the northern boundary of Arkansas. Slavery was, in the year 1819, legal throughout this whole area. Line 10. Boundaries of State of Missouri. The boundaries designated are those of the present State of Missouri. Line 15. Admission of a State with conditions. The right of Congress to admit Missoitri with powers less than those pos- sessed by the older States was the chief constitutional point at issue in the struggle over the Compromise. The South held and successfully maintained the position that this is a union of equal 196 NOTES States, and that Congress cannot admit a State into the Union with powers different from those prescribed by the Constitution. If Congress could so admit, the Union would be a union of un- equal States andhence not the Union created by the Constitution. The Constitution left to each State the power to permit or to forbid slavery ; hence if Missouri, after her admission to the Union, could not exercise this power, she would be inferior to the older States. Page 118, line 16. The Missouri convention. The conven- tion which was elected under the sanction of this act met in June, 1820, and itself framed a State constitution for Missouri. Page 119, line 9. Republican in form. Por definition of Republican, see note, page 71, line 17. Line 12. Federal land policy. It was the settled policy of the United States to retain the ownership of the soil and to con- trol its sale and settlement even when surrendering political control to the newly created States. Similar provisions are found in all acts for the admission of new States. Page 120, line 6. Power to prohibit slavery. The power of Congress to prohibit slavery in the territories was not at the time questioned, although it was later, in the Dred Scott deci- sion, declared unconstitutional. Page 121, line 2. Immigration of negroes into Missouri. The Constitution framed by the Missouri convention contained a provision directing the legislature of the State to pass laws prohibiting the immigration of mulattoes and free negroes and their settlement within the State. When the Missouri constitu- : NOTES 197 tion was presented to Congress, this provision at once aroused the anti-slavery men, and the struggle over slavery broke out again with increased fury. The clause in question was claimed to be unconstitutional, and the second Missouri Compromise, largely the work of Henry Clay, was with great difficulty finally agreed upon. Page 121, line 8. Citizens entitled to privileges and immu- nities in the several States. See Constitution, Art. X, Sec. 2, §1. Page 125, line 18. Jurisdiction on the Alaskan coast. The Czar of Russia in 1821 issued a decree claiming the territory on the northwestern coast of North America as far south as 51° north latitude and exclusive jurisdiction over the seas for one hundred miles from the coast. The United States and Great Britain at once protested, and, as related in the text, treaties for the settlement of the controversy were under negotiation. Final settlement of the dispute was made in a treaty with Rus- sia in 1821, and by one between Russia and Great Britain the following year. Page 126, line 13. Acquisition of territory by colonization forbidden. The plain implication was that any attempt by a FAiropean power to acquire title to American territory under the plea of colonization would be opposed by the United States. Monroe simply stated that, as a matter of fact, every foot of soil on the American continents was already under the sovereignty of recognized powers, and hence the earlier method of acquiring sovereignty over uninhabited territory by colonization was no longer possible. 198 NOTES Page 127, line 12. Political system of allied powers. The political system of the allied powers was, with the exception of France, that of absolute monarchy, while the American system was republican. Line 24. Allied powers prevented from assisting Spain. The immediate purpose of this portion of the message was to prevent the allied powers from assisting Spain in regaining her sovereignty over the former Spanish colonies. This purpose the message accomplished. Any projects that may have been formed for the subjugation of Spanish-America were effectually stopped. Page 128, line 5. Independence recognized. The indepen- dence of the Spanish-American states was recognized by the United States on May 4, 1822. Line 7. Permanent provision of Monroe Doctrine. The alliance of the European powers in the interests of despotism was, as it proved, a temporary one. President Monroe thought it advisable to proclaim a general rule that could apply to future as well as to present conditions, and to warn all European pow- ers that the United States would resent any attempt to oppress or to acquire sovereignty over the independent states of America. Line 23. French occupation of Spain. French armies, act- ing for the allied powers, restored the despicable despot, Ferdi- nand VII, to the throne from which the people of Spain had driven him. Page 129, line 4. Foreign policy toward Europe. See note, page 112, line 11, on Washington's Proclamation of Neutrality. NOTES 199 Page 129, line 9. De facto government. A de facto govern- ment is the one which is actually in power, whether its legal claim to power is just or not. Page 133, line 20. Texas and the Mexican cessions. A map is necessary to follow intelligently the boundary lines described in the text. Page 134, line 7. The Rio Bravo del Norte. Commonly known as the Rio Grande. Line 11. Claims ceded by Texas. Claims to portions of what are now Oklahoma, Kansas, Colorado, and New Mexico were relinquished by Texas. This was a concession to the anti-slavery men. As Texas was a slave State, it was for the interests of the opponents of slavery to detach as much territory from her as possible, especially as a considerable portion of the land was north of 36° 30' north latitude. It was believed that the Missouri Compromise might be extended to cover such territory. Page 135, line 4. Limits of New Mexico. The Territory of New Mexico, as here constituted, comprised the present Terri- tories of New Mexico and Arizona, exclusive of the Gadsden Purchase, together with small portions of Colorado and Nevada. Page 136, line 8. Slavery optional in New Mexico. Douglas, four years later, claimed that this agreement allowing the people of New Mexico, on acquiring statehood, to adopt or reject negro slavery, overthrew the Missouri Compromise and established the principle of popular (squatter) sovereignty. It is certain, how- ever, that there was no understanding in 1850 that the Missouri 200 NOTES Compromise, which was generally taken to refer only to the Louisiana Purchase, was being overthrown. Line 23. California forbids slavery. The constitution sub- mitted to Congress by the California convention had a clause forbidding slavery. Page 137, line 9. Limits of Utah. The Territory of Utah, here constituted, comprised the present State of Utah, nearly all of Nevada, and portions of Colorado and Wyoming. Page 138, line 5. Fugitive Slave Law. This act is commonly known as the Fugitive Slave Law. Page 139, line 4. Federal commissioners. The Supreme Court of the United States had decided that Congress could not impose upon State judges or officials the duty of assisting in the enforcement of the Fugitive Slave Law, thus making it neces- sary, if the law was not to be a dead letter, to provide for its execution by federal officials. Line 17. Marshal. A marshal is the executive officer of a federal court. He corresponds to the sheriff in the State. Page 140, line 5. Responsibility for safe-keeping of fugitive slave. This clause was designed to make sure of the security of the fugitive, even in the hands of an anti-slavery marshal or in an abolition district. Line 14. Fugitive slave clause. See Constitution, Art. IV, Sec. 2, § 3. Line 24. Posse comitatus. A posse comitatus is literally the power of the county, or the good citizens of the community NOTES 201 who have been called upon by a law officer to assist in overcom- ing resistance to his legal authority. Page 143, line 15. Denial of habeas corpus. This clause denied to the negro, claimed to be an escaped slave, the privi- lege of the writ of habeas corpus. It was believed by the anti- slavery men to have been a direct violation of Art. I, Sec. 9, § 2, of the Constitution. Page 146, line 25. Denial of jury trial. The fugitive claimed as a slave was thus delivered to the claimant upon his oath that the negro was the one certified to in the record. Trial by jury was not allowed him. See Constitution, Art. VI, of amendments. Page 148, line 1. Slave trade abolished in the District of Columbia. The traffic in human beings in the national capital was particularly hateful to the anti-slavery advocate. It seemed to him a national disgrace. The compromise, in all probability, could not have passed had it not provided for the abolition of the slave auction block in Washington. Page 153, line 9. Fugitive Slave Law. See "The Fugitive Slave Law " in the Compromise of 1850. Line 19. Missouri Compromise. The Missouri Compromise declared slavery abolished in the Louisiana Purchase north of 36° 30' north latitude, except in the State of Missouri. Page 154, line 1. The repeal of the Compromise. See note, page 136, line 8, on the Compromise of 1850. 202 NOTES ■ase Line 4. Popular sovereignty. Douglas invented the phrase popular sovereignty ; the opponents of the principle called it squatter sovereignty in derision. Line 9. Slavery legal in Louisiana Purchase. Before the passage of the Missouri Compromise slavery was by French law, which had been affirmed by Congress, legal through the whole region. Page 157, line 4. Act of Congress. The Missouri Compro- mise of 1820. Line 12. Unconstitutional act of Congress is void. It is a fundamental principle of interpretation of the Constitution that Congress can exercise only the powers vested in it by the Con- stitution. If it exceeds this expressly conferred authority, its acts are not law. They are null and void, and it is the duty of the Supreme Court to so declare them when a case involving such acts comes before it. Line 20. Congressional control of territories. See Consti- tution, Art. IV, Sec. 3, § 2. Page 161, line 1. Reserved powers. See Art. X of the amendments. Line 21. Slavery recognized by the Constitution. See Art. I, Sec. 2, §3. The use of the word "slave" is avoided, but the existence of slavery is recognized in the apportionment of representatives. Line 22. Importation of slaves. See Constitution, Art. I, Sec. 9, § 1. NOTES 203 Page 162, line 2. Fugitive Slave Law. See Constitution, Art. IV, Sec. 2, § 3. Line 7. Slavery a local institution. Justice McLean, in his dissenting opinion, asserted that the slave was property only by virtue of local law, and hence that there was no deprivation of property if a slave owner chose to take a slave to a place where by the local law slavery was not legal. Page 166, line 10. Power as commander-in-chief. The rules of war gave to President Lincoln, as commander-in chief, in time of war, the power to confiscate the property of the enemy under the plea of military necessity. Slaves were enemy's property and hence, like other property, might be confiscated. Line 22. Sections of the South excepted in the Proclama- tion. The portions of the States of Louisiana and Virginia, excepted in the Proclamation, had submitted to the federal gov- ernment, and the forty-eight counties of Western Virginia were soon to be formed into the new loyal State of West Virginia. Page 167, line 12. Slaves in designated States. Lincoln had no power to declare negroes in the loyal border States free, and they remained slaves notwithstanding the Proclamation of Emancipation, until finally emancipated by the act of their own State or by the Thirteenth Amendment. Line 22. The Negro in the Union Armies. Negroes taking refuge in Union lines were by the authority of the Confis- cation Act of 1862 to be used as laborers on military works. Secretary Welles, in April, 1862, authorized the enlistment of escaped slaves in the navy. In August, 1862, permission was 204 NOTES yat given to arm five thousand negro volunteers for garrison duty Port Royal. In January, 1863, Massachusetts was permitted to organize a colored regiment, and shortly after a second black regiment was sent to the front from Massachusetts. No other States enlisted negro regiments ; nevertheless the national gov- ernment made increasing use of the negro as a soldier, enlisting in all, after the Proclamation of Emancipation, 186,017 blacks in the armies of the United States. Page 170, line 5. All men created equal. See the Declara- ation of Independence, page 3, line 2. This great proposition did not become legally a fact in the United States until slavery had been abolished as a result of the Civil War. Line 7. Preservation of the Union. It should not be lost sight of that the main issue of the war was not the aboli- tion of slavery, but the preservation of the United States as a nation. INDEX TO NOTES Act of Congress, 202 ; void, 202. Admiralty courts, 179. Alaska, jurisdiction in, 197. All men created equal, 204. Allied powers and Spain, 198. Amendments, date of 1st ten, 191; date of 11th, 191; date of 12th, 191; date and necessity for the 13th, 191; date and purpose of the 14th, 192 ; date and purpose of the loth, 192; defect of the 12th, 191; neces- sity for the 12th, 191; not numbered, 190; prior to 1808, 190; title of 1st ten, 190; to Articles of Confederation, 181. Assent to legislation, 175. Eill of Attainder, 187. Bill of Rights, 183, 190. British people warned, 176. Canada, provision for admission, 181. Capitation tax, 188. Charters revoked, 176. Choose, spelling changed, 186. Citizen, entitled to privileges, etc., 197; privileges and im- munities, 177. Civil officers, 180. Commander-in-chief, 203. Commissioners, federal, 200. Committee of the States, 181. Common law jurisdiction, 182. Confederacy, 177. Congress, control of territories, 202; general powers, 179; na- ture, 177; president of, 181; sessions, 186 ; special grants to, 180. Congressmen and office holding, 178. Congressmen, privileges of, 178. Constitution, preamble, 185 ; title, 185. Control, spelling changed, 188. Courts, jurisdiction assigned by Congress, 189. De facto government, 199. Departments of government under the Constitution, 185. Disunion, danger of, 192. 205 206 INDEX TO NOTES Education, public, 183. Elections, time, 186. Executive power, 188. Ex post facto laws, 188. Extradition, 177. Foreign influence, fear of, 194; guarded against, 178. Foreign policy, basis, 194 ; toward Europe, 198. Fugitive slave clause, in the Con- stitution, 189, 200; in the Ordi- nance of 1787, 184. Fugitive Slave Law, 200, 201, 203. Fugitive slaves, responsibility for, 200. General welfare clause, 187. Government, local, 182; organi- zation under Washington, 192; party, 194; three departments of, 182, 194. Habeas corpus, of, 201. 183, 187; denial Inalienable rights, 173. Increased, spelling changed, 189 Impeachment, 186. Independence, declared, 177 ; of Spanish America recognized, 198. Implied powers, 187. Judges, dependent on crown, 174; tenure of office, 189. Jury trial denied, 175, 201. iw Land claims, private, 180 Land policy, federal, 196. Legal acts of States mutually recognized, 177. Legislation by the people, 174. Legislative council, 183. Legislatures dissolved, 176. Marque and reprisal, 179. Marshal, 200. Mercenaries, foreign, 176. Military trials, 175. Missouri, boundaries of State, 195 ; of Territory, 195 ; conven- tion, 196. Missouri Compromise, 201. Money bills, initiation, 186. Monroe Doctrine, permanent pro- vision, 198. Negroes, immigration into Mis- souri, 196 ; in the Union armies, 203. Neutrality Proclamation, 195. New Mexico, boundaries, 199. New offices erected, 174. Northwest Territory , States formed from, 184; States to be formed from, 184. Obligation of contracts, 183. Palladium, 193. Parliamentary control, 175. Petitions for redress, 176. Political associations, 193. Political disabilities, 192. INDEX TO NOTES 207 Political system of allied powers, 198. Popular sovereignty, 202. Posse comiiatus, 200. President, election, 188; succes- sion, 188. Proclamation of Emancipation, districts excepted, 203. Property, law of inheritance, 181 ; qualification, 182. Quartering of soldiers, 174. Quebec Act, 176. Repeal of Compromise, 201. Representation, apportionment, 186 ; basis of, in Congress, 186. Representative Houses dissolved, 174. Republican form of government, 189, 196. Reservation for king's pleasure, 173. Reserved powers, 202. Right of revolution, 173. Rio Bravo del Norte, 199. Senate, treaty making power of, 189. Slavery, a local institution, 203; forbidden in California, 200 ; in Louisiana Purchase, 202; op- tional in New Mexico, 199; power to prohibit, 196 ; prohib- ited in Northwest Territory, 184; recognized by Constitu- tion. 202. Slaves, importation, 187, 202; in designated States, 203. Slave trade in District of Colum- bia, 201. Spain occupied by French, 198. State, admission with conditions, 195; indestructibility of, 190; troops, 179; officers of State troops, 179. States, adoption of Articles of Confederation by, 177; alli- ances between, 178; disputes between, 180 ; majority of nine, 181. Taxation, no power of, under Confederation, 179; unpopular, 194; without consent, 175. Territorial colonization, 197. Texan and Mexican cessions, 199. Texas claims ceded, 199. Titles of nobility, 178. Trade restriction, 175. Treaty, Jay, 193 ; Spanish Treaty of 1795, 193. Treaty making power of States, 178. Trial in England, 175. Union, economic advantages, 193; preservation, 204. Utah, boundaries, 200. Veto, 173. Voting, qualifications, 185; State control, 185. MACMILLAN'S POCKET SERIES OF AMERICAN AND ENGLISH CLASSICS UNIFORM IN PRICE AND BINDING Levanteen - - - - 25 Cents Each Addison's Sir Roger de Coverley. Edited by Zelma Gray, East Side High Schooi, Saginaw, Mich. Browning's Shorter Poems. Edited by Franklin T. Baker, Teachers' College, New York. Browning, Mrs., Poems (Selected). By Miss Hersey, Boston, Mass. Burke's Speech on Conciliation. Edited by S. C. Newsom, Manual Training High School, Indianapolis, Ind. Byron's Childe Harold. Edited by A. J. George, High School, Newton, Mass. Carlyle's Essay on Burns, with Selections. Edited by Willard C. GORE, Armour Institute, Chicago, 111. Chaucer's Prologue to the Book of the Tales of Canterbury, the Knight's Tale, and the Nun's Priest's Tale. Edited by Andrew Ingraham, Late Headmaster of the Swain Free School, New Bedford, Mass. Coleridge's The Ancient Mariner. Edited by T. F. Huntington, Leland Stanford University. Cooper's Last of the Mohicans. Edited by W. K. Wickes, Principal of High School, Syracuse, N. Y. Cooper's The Deerslayer. De Quincey's Confessions of an English Opium Eater. Edited by ARTHUR Beatty, University of Wisconsin. Dryden's Palamon and Arcite. Edited by Percival Chubb, Vice Prin- cipal Ethical Culture Schools, New York. Early American Orations, 1760-1824. Edited by Louie R. Heller, In- structor in English in the De Witt Clinton High School, New York City. Franklin's Autobiography. George Eliot's Silas Marner. Edited by E. L. Gulick, Lawrenceville School, Lawrenceville, N. J. Goldsmith's Vicar of Wakefield. Edited by H. W. Boynton, Phillips Academy, Andover, Mass. Hawthorne's Twice Told Tales. By C. R. Gaston, Richmond Hill High School, Borough of Queens, New York City. Irving's Alhambra. Edited by Alfred M. Hitchcock, Hartford Public High School, Conn. Irving's Sketch Book. Longfellow's Evangeline. Edited by Lewis B. Semple, Commercial High School, Brooklyn. American anfc (JHngltslj Classics Lowell's Vision of Sir Launfal. Edited by Herbert E. Bates, Manual Training High School, Brooklyn, N. Y. Macaulay's Essay on Addison. Edited by C. W. French, Principal of Hyde Park High School, Chicago, 111. Macaulay's Essay on Clive. Edited by J. W. Pearce, Assistant Pro- fessor of English in Tulane University. Macaulay's Essay on Milton. Edited by C. W. French. Macaulay's Essay on Warren Hastings. Edited by Mrs. M. J. Frick, Los Angeles, Cal. Milton's Comus, Lycidas, and Other Poems. Edited by Andrew J. George, Newton, Mass. Milton's Paradise Lost. Books I and II. Edited by W. I. Crane, Steele High School, Dayton, O. Poe's Prose Tales (Selections from). Pope's Homer's Iliad. Edited by Albert Smyth, Head Professor of English Language and Literature, Central High School, Philadelphia, Pa. Ruskin's Sesame and Lilies, and King of the Golden River. Edited by Herbert E. Bates, Manual Training High School, Brooklyn, N. Y. Scott's Ivanhoe. Edited by Alfred M. Hitchcock, Hartford Public High School, Conn. Scott's Lady of the Lake. Edited by Elizabeth A. Packard, Oak- land, Cal. Scott's Marmion. Edited by George B. AlTON, State Inspector of High Schools for Minnesota. Shakespeare's As You Like It. Edited by Charles Robert Gaston, Teacher of English, Richmond Hill High School, Queens Borough, New York City. Shakespeare's Julius Caesar. Edited by George W. Hufford and Lois G. Hufford, High School, Indianapolis, Ind. Shakespeare's Merchant of Venice. Edited by Charlotte W. Under- wood, Lewis Institute, Chicago, 111. Shakespeare's Macbeth. Edited by C. W. French, Hyde Park High School. Shelley and Keats (Selections from). Edited by S. C. Newsom, Manual Training High School, Indianapolis, Ind. Southern Poems. Edited by W. L. Weber, Professor of English Litera- ture in Emory College, Oxford, Ga. Tennyson's The Princess. Edited by Wilson Farrand, Newark Academy, Newark, N. J. Tennyson's Idylls of the King. Edited by W. T. Vlymen, Principal of Eastern District High School, Brooklyn, N. Y. Stevenson's Treasure Island. Edited by Hiram Albert Vance, Ph.D. (Jena), Professor of English in the University of Nashville. Mrs. "Browning's Poems. Selections. Edited by Heloise E. HERSEY. John Woolman's Journal. 112 « ■• V^ .7 \. •by 4* .*' 4 % w ^ t «<3«. y a? J> * *^W* o ' &' .*! 1* M 2r- ^*< y£K^'. ^/ Adw- ■