.W4 ^\\o 
 
/E 263 
 /i.N4 B16 
 Copy 1 
 
 Th( 
 
 Beginnings of the Revolution 
 
 IN 
 
 New Hampshire 
 
 Henry M. Baker 
 

 < 
 
4 -. »■/.; ■XVS^ ^^vi.%.. <.»a. 
 
 BBasw^f^wiWWS 
 
 > / 
 
THE 
 
 BEGINNINGS OF THE 
 REVOLUTION 
 
 IN 
 
 NEW HAMPSHIRE 
 
 DELIVERED BEFORE THE NEW HAMPSHIRE SOCIETY OF SONS OF THE 
 
 AMERICAN REVOLUTION IN CONCORD, N. H., 
 
 JULY 9, 1903 
 
 HENRY M. BAKER 
 
 PRESIDENT OF THE SOCIETY 
 
 CONCORD, N. H. 
 
 RUMFORD PRINTING COMPANY 
 
 1903 
 
 ^ r-^ 
 

 Author. 
 
 (PofMIl). 
 
 l2Ja '04 
 
 ^ 
 
THE BEGINNINGS OF THE REVOLUTION 
 IN NEW HAMPSHIRE. 
 
 Compatriots , Ladies and Gejitlenien : 
 
 At the close of the French and Indian War England had no more 
 loyal colony than New Hampshire. In proportion to her population 
 and resources no colony had rendered the mother country more effi- 
 cient service. Her yeomen were skilled in all the essentials of fron- 
 tier life. They were self-reliant, patriotic, and self-sacrificing. They 
 were accustomed to the harsh climate of northern New England and 
 the demands of a winter dominating nearly half of the year. By 
 incessant toil they won subsistence from an ungenerous and exacting 
 soil. They knew how to hunt the wild beasts of the forest, and how 
 to defend themselves against the attacks of the relentless red man. 
 There was no titled nobility among them, living upon inherited estates, 
 but those of every class and condition felt the necessity of personal 
 service as a condition precedent to the confidence and esteem of 
 their fellow-citizens. Helpful service was universal. Neither women 
 or half-grown children were exceptions. TJie whole community was 
 active, and each in his own way, according to his capacity, contrib- 
 uted to the general prosperity of the colony. Peace having come, 
 and with it immunity from Indian raids, so that the husbandman 
 could work in safety, contentment and aspiration filled the hearts of 
 our ancestors, and New Hampshire made rapid strides in population 
 and wealth. 
 
 All the New England colonies were prosperous and loyal. Each 
 had been granted a share in its government, the popular branch of 
 its legislature, under the designation of " the assembly," being elected 
 by the people. All grants of money for public uses received the sanc- 
 tion of the assembly, and generally such grants originated with the 
 representatives of the people. Thus the colonists had been educated 
 to believe that they controlled their own purse strings, and that their 
 consent v/as essential to lawful taxation. 
 
4 
 
 The wars in which England had been engaged had left her deeply 
 in debt, and king and ministry were in doubt how to raise the money 
 of which the government had sore need. The prosperity and increas- 
 ing wealth of the colonies were well known in the mother country. 
 The king regarded the colonists as subjects without home rights or 
 privileges, but under his absolute control, and in duty bound to help 
 the parent country as and when required. His ideas of their obliga- 
 tions and duties were not limited by their claims to the rights inherent 
 in Englishmen under Magna Charta or otherwise. He entertained 
 no doubt that his will and the needs of the kingdom, as decided by 
 the ministry, were mandatory and final. 
 
 On the other hand, the colonists insisted that they were English- 
 men, and that they had neither yielded or lost any of their rights as 
 such by settlement in America ; that at home no tax could be levied 
 or collected but in pursuance of the act or consent of the house of 
 commons, in which all resident Englishmen were directly or indirectly 
 represented ; that, as neither the king nor parliament had provided 
 such representation for them, they could not be taxed lawfully against 
 their will, and that, as taxation without representation is tyranny, 
 they could not, as self-respecting Englishmen, consent to it. Between 
 vassalage and representative government there is a great gulf fixed. 
 On the one side are the standards of power and prerogative, on the 
 other the banners of liberty and law. Hence the differences which 
 separated the king and the colonists were based upon principles for 
 which each contended as a matter of right. The people could not 
 yield and preserve their manhood and integrity as Englishmen. The 
 king regarded them as rebels denying him his rightful authority. 
 
 There seems to have been no earnest attempt to meet the issue by 
 granting colonial representation, or by compromise measures or agree- 
 ments which should be beneficial to king and people. In England 
 the king and ministry held the enactments of parliament concerning 
 the colonies as conclusive and final. During all the discussions in 
 parliament no authoritative assurance was given that England would 
 abandon its purpose to tax America. The necessity for the revenue 
 such taxation was expected to produce was uniformly asserted by 
 those in power. The right of parliament to tax the colonists seems 
 not to have been doubted by king or ministry. 
 
 The Americans hoped against hope, and were loath to believe that 
 England could persist in taxation without granting representation. 
 So, when parliament levied duties upon their imports and restricted 
 their trade with the West Indies, they not only refrained from such 
 
)^ 
 
 trade but intentionally neglected to trade with England, and satisfac- 
 torily met the issue by non-importation and non-consumption agree- 
 ments among themselves. 
 
 There was much discussion in parliament upon the advisability of 
 enacting a Stamp Act for America, the minority opposing it being 
 active and outspoken. The substance of the argument for and against 
 it was well known to the colonists. The feeling of resentment and 
 bitterness engendered by the act in restraint of trade was increased by 
 the expressions of hostility in parliament while the Stamp Act was 
 under consideration. So the colonists were in no pleasant mood for 
 the reception of the Stamp Act when the news of its enactment was 
 received, and the determination to resist its enforcement was practi- 
 cally universal. 
 
 In England taxation by stamps was regarded with much favor 
 because it involved slight expense, required few officers, and "exe- 
 cuted itself," as, by the terms of the Stamp Act, the proceedings of 
 the courts and in public offices, and the business transactions of indi- 
 viduals, would not be legal without the statutory stamps. It never 
 occurred to the ministry that the colonial courts and people would so 
 universally repudiate them that no one would dare to question the 
 invalidity of unstamped legal or business papers. That result as- 
 tounded king and ministry and the whole English nation. The 
 Stamp Act became operative on the first day of November, 1765. 
 T/te New Hampshire Gazette, printed then, as now, at Portsmouth, 
 appeared the evening before in black. Quite a company of men from 
 the country marched toward Portsmouth to prevent the use of the 
 stamps, and dispersed only when duly informed that none would be 
 used. 
 
 George Meserve of Portsmouth, son of the colonel who died at 
 Louisbourg, was in England when the act was passed, and received 
 the appointment of stamp agent for New Hampshire. His coming to 
 execute his office was carefully watched, and before he was permitted 
 to land he was compelled to resign his commission and to take an 
 oath that he would neither directly or indirectly attempt to execute 
 his office. The stamps intended for New Hampshire were shipped to 
 Boston without being landed. No other attempt was made to force 
 the stamps upon our people. The committee of Portsmouth voted 
 that Meserve was "an enemy to the liberties of America." Subse- 
 quently he petitioned the assembly for compensation for the injuries 
 he claimed to have suffered. The committee of the assembly, in 
 reporting upon his request, said he had suffered no real damage either 
 
6 
 
 in person or property, and that when any danger had been expected 
 guards had been appointed to protect him. His petition was dis- 
 missed. 
 
 Parliament repealed the Stamp Act on the i8th day of March, 1766. 
 It had been operative less than five months, and had yielded no rev- 
 enue. Every attempt to collect revenue from the colonies had been 
 frustrated. Had England sought peace with her colonies, and offered 
 them representation in parliament, the conflict would have ended, for 
 the colonies were anxious for reconciliation. 
 
 With the repeal of the Stamp Act the secretary of state of Great 
 Britain sent a circular letter to the colonies in which he enlarged upon 
 "the lenity and tenderness, the moderation and forbearance of par- 
 liament toward the colonies," and reminded them of their duty to 
 show " respectful gratitude and cheerful obedience " in consideration 
 of such a " signal display of indulgence and affection." 
 
 This letter was placed before the assembly by Governor Wentworth 
 with conservative and conciliatory statements. 
 
 The people were wild with joy. They felt relieved from an unjust 
 burden, and again trusted that the hope of their hearts for self-taxa- 
 tion had been recognized and would be realized, but the more thought- 
 ful were troubled by the assertion of parliament that it had the right 
 and power " to bind America in all cases whatsoever," and by the 
 fact that the resolves of the colonial assemblies denying the right of 
 parliament to tax the colonies, and asserting their sole right to tax 
 themselves, had been annulled. The wiser of the patriots were appre- 
 hensive that parliament, as well as the king, was hostile, and that the 
 repeal of the Stamp Act was a political act not based upon principle 
 but policy, and that it would be followed by other orders and enact- 
 ments equally burdensome and quite as subversive of the principles 
 for which they were contending. 
 
 While the popular mind was tending toward rejoicing, and hope 
 was slowly taking the place of fear. Gov. Benning Wentworth was 
 permitted to resign and John Wentworth was appointed governor. 
 Like his uncle and predecessor he was born in Portsmouth, and knew 
 the needs and wishes of the people. He was deservedly popular, and 
 by example and patronage fostered education, agriculture, and the 
 varied interests of the colony. He was popular at home and in Eng- 
 land. The Lords of Trade said of him that since his appointment the 
 colony had been in a state of peace and prosperity, and its commerce 
 extended and increased. He was energetic and courteous, and the 
 people contrasted with favor his official bearing with that of the gov- 
 
ernors of other colonies. The success of his early administration, 
 combined with his personal popularity, turned the minds of many, 
 where all desired peace and loyalty, from public affairs to local im- 
 provements. So when parliament renewed its efforts to enforce taxa- 
 tion without representation, and imposed duties on paper, glass, paint- 
 ers' colors, and tea, our people were slow to evince open hostility or 
 to become excited over the new assault upon their liberties. Many of 
 the rich and influential families of Portsmouth counseled moderation, 
 and opposed non-importation agreements, but when the other colo- 
 nies took decided action in opposition to the new taxes New Hamp- 
 shire joined them. Soon the agreements became popular, and were a 
 test of loyalty to home government in home affairs. The opposition 
 to the new tax was not as noisy as it had been to the Stamp Act, but 
 it was better organized and more universal in the different colo- 
 nies. The agreements were so well kept that the manufacturers 
 in Great Britain found their market seriously endangered, and urged 
 the repeal of the new law. This was done except as to tea. With 
 this repeal came a relaxation of the opposition, and again the colo- 
 nists hoped there would be no further repressive legislation and that 
 peace and goodwill would prevail. But the duty on tea remained and 
 became the rock upon which the ship of state foundered. 
 
 When Governor Wentworth asked the assembly for a stated and 
 liberal salary there was much delay in granting it, as some feared the 
 tax on tea was in some unexplained way connected with the expenses 
 of the colonies for the salaries of officers of the crown. Hence the 
 assembly refused to make provision for the governor's salary and 
 house rent beyond one year at a time. 
 
 The non-importation agreements had had their effect. The ware- 
 houses of the East India Company were filled with tea for which there 
 was no market. The plans of the ministry and the company had 
 failed. Therefore a new scheme was adopted. Parliament removed 
 the duty on the exportation of tea, and authorized the company to 
 ship it to America upon payment of a duty of only threepence per 
 pound. This would enable the company to sell tea in America 
 cheaper than ever before, and it was hoped that the decrease in price 
 would overcome the objections of the colonists. The result was unex- 
 pected. The colonists were filled with distrust and alarm, for they 
 recognized that the new legislation was an attempt to outwit them 
 and to bribe them to consume tea upon which duty had been paid. 
 The right for which parliament contended was hostile to the principle 
 which they asserted. One or the other must fail. The price of the 
 
8 . 
 
 tea was immaterial. The principle involved was essential, and would 
 determine the fate of nations. A crisis was at hand. The virtue 
 and integrity of the people and the right of self-government were 
 involved. The people met the issue grandly. As if by a common 
 instinct all classes refused the bribe. The prudence and popularity of 
 Governor Wentworth could not withstand the people's censure of the 
 home government. The endeavor to accomplish by indirect means 
 that which had failed by direct enactment aroused and consolidated 
 whatever of the spirit of liberty had remained dormant. The people 
 had determined not to raise revenue for the support of a government 
 in which they could not participate. Therefore they would not buy 
 tea at any price. Governor Wentworth wrote the Earl of Dartmouth 
 under date of August 29, 1774: "The inhabitants have now almost 
 universally discontinued the use of Bohea tea, and I apprehend will 
 entirely within three months of this date." The non-importation and 
 non-consumption agreements were faithfully kept. There were two 
 attempts to land tea at Portsmouth. The first importation, consist- 
 ing of twenty-seven chests, had been landed and stored in the custom 
 house before the people knew such action was intended. The people 
 met in town-meeting and required its consignee to reship it to Halifax. 
 This was peacefully done. When, less than three months later, the 
 second cargo of thirty chests arrived, consigned to the same party, 
 much greater excitement prevailed ; the windows of his house were 
 broken, and he was compelled to send it to Halifax by the ship in 
 which it was brought. Thus ended the final attempt to force taxed 
 tea upon our people. Day by day they became more excited and 
 determined. Committees were appointed to prevent future importa- 
 tions, and to arouse and consolidate public sentiment against the hos- 
 tile acts of the British ministry. They were faithful and successful. 
 The situation became more alarming each day. It soon became cer- 
 tain that the king was determined to execute the acts of parliament 
 imposing taxes upon America. Boston was selected as an example. 
 Its port was closed to commerce and guarded by ships of war. A 
 military governor ruled the town, and a large garrison was quartered 
 upon its citizens. Business was suspended, and the poor suifered for 
 food. The soldiery was insolent, and a conflict seemed inevitable. 
 I New Hampshire sympathized with her brethren in Massachusetts 
 land sent them help and food. A common cause and a common dan- 
 'ger united the people closer than ever before. They remembered the 
 congress that had met in Albany in 1754 to consider matters of 
 importance to the several colonies, and the more frequent meetings in 
 
9 
 
 New England of committees representing the people, and thought the 
 times demanded consultation and combined action. So, when the 
 legislature met in the spring of 1774, the house of representatives of 
 New Hampshire appointed a committee to correspond with like com- 
 mittees of other colonies relative to the proper course to be pursued to 
 maintain the rights they claimed as Englishmen, and to secure united 
 action to resist any attempt to enforce the laws they regarded as 
 unjust and oppressive. 
 
 Governor Wentworth used his influence to prevent that action, and, 
 when it was accomplished, adjourned the assembly, and soon after 
 dissolved it. The representatives, upon a summons by the commit- 
 tee, met in their hall, and the governor, attended by the sheriff, 
 appeared. The representatives rose at his entrance. He addressed 
 them, saying their meeting was illegal, and ordered the sheriff to 
 direct all persons to disperse and keep the king's peace, and the 
 sheriff made that proclamation. They then retired, and the repre- 
 sentatives resumed their session, but upon discussion of the situation 
 adjourned to another place. There they wrote letters to the several 
 towns in the province asking them to send delegates to a convention 
 to assemble at Exeter July 21, 1774, to choose delegates to a general 
 congress to meet in Philadelphia on the 5 th of September, and to 
 send in their share, according to the tax rate, of two hundred pounds 
 to pay the expenses of the delegates to be elected. They also recom- 
 mended a day of fasting and prayer which was generally observed. 
 
 Eighty-five delegates met and elected John Sullivan and Nathaniel 
 Folsom to the continental congress. They also expressed their sym- 
 pathy with their distressed brethren in Boston, and recommended the 
 towns to send relief. 
 
 Governor Wentworth endeavored to preserve the semblance of royal 
 authority, but saw, with great anxiety, his influence with the people 
 steadily decrease. They had committed no violence or outrage and 
 the local laws were respected, but it was evident that loyalty to the 
 crown was fast disappearing. He wrote, " Our hemisphere threatens 
 a hurricane. I have in vain strove, almost to death, to prevent it. If 
 I can at last bring out of it safety to my country and honor to my sov- 
 ereign, my labors will be joyful." His fears were realized, and he 
 himself unintentionally, probably, added to the excitement and oppo- 
 sition of the hour. General Gage decided to erect barracks in Boston 
 to shield his troops during the approaching New England winter. 
 The carpenters of Boston refused to build them, and were sustained 
 in their refusal by public opinion. General Gage then appealed to 
 
10 
 
 the governors of the neighboring provinces to send him the necessary 
 workmen. Governor Wentworth committed the error of employing a 
 person to secretly secure the desired mechanics. His action soon 
 became known to the committee of Portsmouth, who, without men- 
 tioning the governor's name, censured him " as an enemy to the com- 
 munity," and the men who had consented to go as " unworthy of 
 society." His agent was compelled to confess his error and to ask 
 pardon for his misbehavior. 
 
 Colonel Folsom and Major Sullivan attended the congress at Phila- 
 delphia and were prominent in its deliberations. Its proceedings 
 were dignified and firm, yet peaceful. Everywhere in the colonies this 
 congress was approved, and no colony was better satisfied than New 
 Hampshire. She heartily welcomed her delegates upon their return. 
 The people stood firm in maintenance of the patriotic principles 
 asserted by them, and the feeling that liberty must be preserved at all 
 hazards, even by revolution, was universal. All recognized that the 
 then existing condition of affairs could not be maintained and that 
 bloodshed might soon follow. 
 
 No one desired to be disloyal to Great Britain, but all claimed the 
 privileges and immunities they beheved were the birthright of English- 
 men. They did not love loyalty less but liberty more. Their duty was 
 plain, and they were ready to meet the issue when it should come. They 
 did not have long to wait. An order had been passed by the king in 
 council prohibiting the importation of powder, military stores, and sup- 
 plies to America, thus plainly showing his distrust of the colonists and 
 his determination to prevent them from securing the means of self- 
 defence. The news of this order was brought to the committee at 
 Portsmouth on the 13th of December, 1774, by Paul Revere, who was 
 sent by the committee at Boston. Nothing had transpired before 
 which so alarmed the colonists. It had been rumored at Portsmouth 
 for several days that a ship-of-war would soon bring reinforcements to 
 Fort William and Mary. Unless the British government was intent 
 upon coercing the colonists there could be no necessity for reinforcing 
 the fort or depriving them of powder and arms. 
 
 The committee was confronted by a grave and critical condition of 
 public affairs. It met as soon as possible, and after due deliberation 
 decided upon an attack upon the fort the next day, and the seizure of 
 the powder known to be stored there. That night and early the next 
 day the proposed attack was confided only to those known to be in 
 hearty sympathy with the committee of safety, but by noon all attempt 
 at secrecy was abandoned. Drums were beaten, fifes played, and men 
 
11 
 
 marched and countermarched in the streets openly proclaiming their 
 purpose. 
 
 Governor Wentvvorth was powerless, but ordered the chief justice of 
 the province to proclaim to the people that an attack upon the fort 
 would be rebeUion and treason against the king. This proclamation 
 seems to have had little or no effect, for soon after it was made some 
 four hundred men under the leadership of John Langdon, in broad 
 daylight marched to the fort, and, though fired upon by its small gar- 
 rison, overpowered them, detained them as prisoners in their own fort, 
 and hauled down the king's colors. They captured 103 barrels of 
 powder, with which they returned to Portsmouth, and that evening 
 sent it with a letter signed by John Langdon to Major Sullivan at Dur- 
 ham for safe keeping. 
 
 The next day, Thursday the 15th, as soon as the news of the assault 
 upon the fort reached them, men from the adjoining towns hastened 
 into Portsmouth. Among the first to arrive was Major Sullivan with 
 some two score men from Durham. Soon a meeting was held and a 
 committee chosen, of which Sullivan was one, to visit the governor 
 and ask him if he had sent for any reinforcements, or if he expected 
 any troops or ships to arrive at Portsmouth. He spoke earnestly of 
 the grave offense which had been committed the night before, assured 
 them he could not promise pardon to any engaged in the assault upon 
 the fort, but sagaciously added that if the powder was returned that 
 act would be regarded as "an alleviation of the offence," and closed 
 by asserting that he knew of neither troops or ships coming into the 
 province. The people, these assurances being reported to them, ap- 
 peared to be satisfied, and many returned to their homes, but Sullivan, 
 with a sufficient number of men, remained, and at night again captured 
 the fort and took away fifteen 4-pounders, one 9-pounder, all the small 
 arms, and a quantity of shot. 
 
 At noon of the day following the first assault the governor had 
 ordered the commanding officers of the militia " to enlist or impress 
 thirty effective men to serve His Majesty as a guard and protection to 
 his Fort William and Mary." They made return that night that they 
 had paraded the streets, had drums beaten and proclamation made, 
 but that no person appeared to enlist. He had done all he could to 
 protect the fort and the honor of his sovereign, but was powerless. 
 
 On Friday, the i6th of the month. Colonel Folsom arrived with «'a 
 great number of armed men " from Exeter,- and assisted in removing 
 the captured cannon and shot to a place of safety. 
 
 Thus it appears that both of our delegates to the first continental 
 
12 
 
 congress were personally connected with the capture of the military 
 stores from the fort, and hence were the first of these delegates to 
 actually bear arms against the king. 
 
 That the assault and capture of Fort William and Mary, the hauling 
 down of the British flag, and the removal of the powder, cannon, and 
 arms therefrom was the first deliberate overt act of hostility to the king 
 in the Revolution is too well known and authenticated to need proof. 
 It was not an act in defense of an attack, but was itself an attack made 
 by men who knew the nature and effect of their conduct and did not 
 shrink from its consequences. They felt that their necessities were 
 great, and that the time and occasion demanded heroic action. Sub- 
 sequent events fully justified them. The prompt and decisive way in 
 which they responded to the first indication that the mother country 
 had decided to diminish, possibly to destroy, their capacity to defend 
 themselves is one of the notable events in the history of liberty. We 
 cannot tell its story too often or commend it too much. 
 
 A few days later His Majesty's ships Canceaiix and Scarborough ar- 
 rived off Portsmouth from Boston with about one hundred soldiers for 
 the double purpose of dismantling the fort and threatening the people. 
 The Scarborough soon detained two vessels laden with provisions, and 
 took them to Boston against the advice of the governor and the remon- 
 strances of the people. Their cargoes were retained for the use of the 
 troops. 
 
 When this became known at Portsmouth a party of armed men 
 captured the battery on Jerry's point and removed 8 cannon of 24 and 
 32-pound calibre. These cannon were subsequently mounted in Forts 
 Washington and Sullivan for the defense of Portsmouth. 
 
 The second provincial congress met at Exeter on the 25 th of Janu- 
 ary, 1775, and elected John Sullivan and John Langdon delegates to 
 the continental congress, and provided ^250 to pay their expenses. 
 
 An address to the people was issued, and a letter sent to Governor 
 Wentworth as follows : 
 
 " Governor Gage, in a letter to the Earl of Dartmouth, dated 27th 
 January, 1775, informed the British Ministry that your Excellency, 
 had applied to him for two regiments of the British troops, to be sta- 
 tioned at Portsmouth : and as it evidently appears, at this alarming 
 period, that the British troops are ministerial tools sent to America to 
 endeavor to enforce unconstitutional and tyrannical Acts of the British 
 Parliament by fire, sword and famine, and as we humbly conceive it 
 is your Excellency's duty in your political capacity, to guard and 
 defend the lives, liberty and properties of the inhabitants of this 
 
13 
 
 Province, your Excellency's sending for troops to destroy the lives, 
 liberties and properties you have 'solemnly engaged to defend and pro- 
 tect conveys to our minds such shocking ideas, that we shall rejoice 
 to find what is represented to be fact in said letter, to be farce. But 
 as we have such information, duty to ourselves and constituents, 
 obliges us humbly to desire your Excellency to give us such evidence 
 as will enable us to know and inform our constituents what to 
 expect." 
 
 A committee on correspondence was elected, with power to call 
 another congress when necessary. 
 
 The winter passed in doubt and anxiety, with no practical results. 
 Boston had been garrisoned with officers and men who despised the 
 provincials, who, in turn, regarded the troops as enemies. Those of 
 the citizens who could do so abandoned the city and found homes in 
 the country. Wherever they went they told a story of scorn, insult, 
 and oppression, which kept the people in bitterness toward the Eng- 
 lish. 
 
 With the early spring came ships from England bearing word that 
 the petition of congress had been favorably received by the king, and 
 that the merchants of England were favorable to the American cause. 
 A ray of hope revived the colonists and relieved the gloom which had 
 so long overshadowed them. It was of short duration, for soon later 
 and more reliable despatches informed them parliament had voted 
 that Massachusetts was in rebellion, and that the other colonies were 
 aiding her ; that the lords and commons had addressed the king, 
 assuring him of their support and asking him to enforce their revenue 
 laws upon the colonists ; that the king was increasing his forces by 
 sea and land ; that troops of all kinds had been ordered to America ; 
 that the commerce of New England was to be further restricted and 
 various prohibitive orders issued. The colonists were in despair, and 
 abandoned all hope of peace with honor and safety. A resort to 
 arms appeared inevitable, and they began to prepare for the conflict. 
 
 The third provincial congress met at Exeter on the 2ist of April, 
 1775, wit^"* 6^ delegates in attendance. This congress approved of 
 the capture of Fort William and Mary and the battery at Jerry's 
 point, and passed votes of thanks to those who had secured the pow- 
 der and guns from them. It also expressed the wish of the people to 
 the members of the state assembly which had been convened by the 
 governor. 
 
 Meanwhile American affairs had absorbed much of the time and 
 attention of the British parliament. On the 20th of February, 1775, 
 Lord North arose in his place and said in part : 
 
14 
 
 "To be explicit, then, as to my own opinion, I must say, that if the 
 dispute in which the Americans have engaged goes to the whole of our 
 authority, we can enter into no negotiation, we can meet no compro- 
 mise. If it be only as to the suspension of the exercise of our right, 
 or as to the mode of laying and raising taxes for a contribution 
 towards the common defense, I think it would be just, it would be 
 wise to meet any fair proposition, which may come in an authentic 
 way from any Province or Colony : and on this ground it is that I 
 shall propose to the Committee the following Resolution : 
 
 " ' That it is the opinion of this Committee, that when the Gover- 
 nor, Council and Assembly or General Court of any of His Majesty's 
 Provinces or Colonies in America, shall propose to make provision, 
 according to the condition, circumstances and situation of such 
 Province or Colony, for contributing their proportion to the common 
 defence (such proportion to be raised under the authority of the Gen- 
 eral Court or General Assembly of such Province or Colony and dis- 
 posable by Parliament), and shall engage to make provision also for 
 the support of the Civil Government, and the administration of justice 
 in such Province or Colony, it will be proper, if such proposal shall 
 be approved by His Majesty and the two Houses of Parliament, and 
 for so long as such provision shall be made accordingly, to forbear, 
 in respect of such Province or Colony, to levy any Duty, Tax or 
 Assessment, or to impose any further Duty, Tax or Assess- 
 ment, except only such Duties as it may be expedient to con- 
 tinue to levy or to impose for the regulation of commerce ; the nett 
 produce of the Duties last mentioned to be carried to the account of 
 such Province or Colony respectively.' " 
 
 It was the evident purpose of Lord North, and of parliament in 
 adopting his resolutions, to encourage the loyalty of those in America 
 who had sustained its enactments and the acts of George the Third, 
 and, if possible, to divide and weaken the patriots. The resolutions 
 were heralded by those in authority as a proposition for home rule, 
 and in themselves presented some plausible suggestions upon which 
 compromise seemed possible. But when Lord North's speech intro- 
 ducing the resolutions was received, and it became known, also, that 
 the British troops were to remain, and those who had been prominent 
 in the patriot cause were to be punished, the colonists had every rea- 
 son to continue to believe parliament hostile to them. 
 
 Governor Wentworth endeavored to the last, to use his own words, 
 '« to plant the root of peace in New Hampshire." As soon as he had 
 received an official copy of the resolutions he summoned a new assem- 
 
15 
 
 bly of the colony to meet at Portsmouth May 4th, 1775, but made the 
 grave error of including in the writs of election three new towns, 
 which he hoped would send members favorable to his purpose, and 
 neglected to authorize elections in older towns of greater population. 
 
 In his speech at the opening of the assembly the governor addressed 
 them as " the only legal and constitutional representatives of the peo- 
 ple," and urged them to "an affectionate reconciliation with the 
 Mother country." The house shrewdly asked time for consultation 
 with their constituents, and the governor reluctantly adjourned them 
 until the 12th of the next month. When the assembly reconvened 
 according to adjournment the governor spoke in behalf of reconcilia- 
 tion, and again advised the acceptance of the propositions contained 
 in the resolutions of Lord North. In its reply to the governor's speech 
 the house asserted its desire for reconciliation and peace "upon a just, 
 solid, and permanent basis," and added, "But we are apprehensive 
 the settlement of the present distressing difficulties is an object of such 
 magnitude, and a matter of such general concernment to all the Col- 
 onies, as far exceeds our circumscribed power and influence." The 
 house then proceeded to expel the three members from the new towns, 
 whereupon the governor adjourned the assembly to the nth day of 
 July- 
 One of the expelled members very injudiciously expressed himself 
 upon the street in Portsmouth quite freely in hostility to the house 
 and people, and was assaulted by the patriots, whereupon he took 
 refuge in the governor's house. The people demanded him from the 
 governor and were refused. They then brought a mounted gun to his 
 door and renewed their demand, when he was surrendered and taken 
 to Exeter. The governor was indignant at the insult he had received, 
 and retired to the fort, from which, in July, he sent a message to the 
 assembly adjourning it to the 28th of September, and soon after sailed 
 to Boston, where he remained until September, when he came to the 
 Isles of Shoals, staying only long enough to issue a proclamation 
 adjourning the assembly to April of the next year. This was his last 
 act as governor, and with it kingly power ceased in New Hampshire. 
 Meanwhile, events had transpired which made reconciliation, or 
 compromise, impossible. The expedition ordered by General Gage to 
 capture and destroy the military stores and supplies of the colonists at 
 Concord, and the conflicts with the patriots at Lexington and Con- 
 cord, the spontaneous uprising of the people in all the colonies, the 
 investment of Boston, and the battle at Bunker hill followed in quick 
 succession. The liberties of the people were in the keeping of the god 
 of battles. 
 
/ 
 
 J 
 
;„7.^ "^^ "F CONGRESS 
 
 011 800 876 5 
 
„BRABV0FCON^" 
 
 011800 876 5