Author . '^tt:^' Title .£ Imprint. •.Gic^.5'. Xa — 47372-2 aPO iliii flfilii lllllll '■^^M Andrew Jackson, Tennessee and the Union A PAPER By albert V. GOODPASTURE >,.. ill- e.X U Read before the Tennessee Historical Society Tuesday, June ii, 1895 NASHVILLE, TENN. BRANDON PRINTING COMPANY 1895 f. 3lJa'03 ^K:^^ ANDREW JACKSON, TENNESSEE AND THE UNION. I couple the name of Jacksou with the title of this paper, because around him crystallized the peculiar political tenets held by the Tennesseans of his day. I do not hold that he moulded the sentiment of Tennessee. On the contrary, I believe the conditions that obtained in her settlement gave a common direction to the political opinions of the people of the State, and that Andrew Jackson, who was a born leader of men, was the recognized expo- nent only of those sentiments which were common to his countrymen. The first settlers of Tennessee were practicall}^ cut off from communication with the older settle- ments of the country. The great mountains lay between them and the mother State, on the east: the South was still in the possession of their savage enemies ; the far West was but an unexplored French province ; and the neighboring North was 3^et the "dark and bloody ground" where "death was in almost every bush, and every thicket con- cealed an ambuscade." In this isolated condition, for nearly a quarter of a century, her undaunted sons defended alone her 4 ANDRKW JACKvSON, scattered settlements against the assaults of a pow- erful savage foe, aided and encouraged, as they were, by the emissaries of both Spain and Great Britain. I venture the assertion that no other settlements, however remote, within the territorial limits of any State of the Union, were ever suffered to defend alone so unequal a war — sometimes threatening the very existence of the settlements, and a merci- less extermination of their people — for so long a period, without once receiving armed assistance from their mother State. Not only did they defend their own settlements, but in the most critical period of the Revolution, they won for themselves imperishable fame, in the service of the Union, east of the mountains. Utterly impotent to grant any relief to these settlements in the beginning, North Carolina appears to have been criminally indifferent to their necessities after the exigencies of the revolution had passed and left her more able to provide for their safety. It can hardly be said that Tennessee fared better in this respect, as a Territory of the United States, from 1789 to 1796. After North Carolina had freed herself of a responsibility she had never met, by ceding her western settlements to the United States, no federal troops ever marched to its defense, even in its most dire extremity. The battles of the Northwest were fought by the national go\-ernment, and the story of its settlement is linked with the names of TENNESSEE AND THE UNION. 5 the great commanders who were sent to defend it. The only Territory of the United States that has ever been denied the protection of federal arms was this cast-away child of North Carolina. Not only did its brave pioneers fight its battles alone, but they were misunderstood and chided by the federal government when they were forced, in their neces- sary defense, to pursue the enemy into his own country and administer to him the chastisement his merciless cruelties so richh^ merited. This absolute and complete self-reliance, while it made the tragic story of her settlement more touch- ing and more heroic than that of any other State of the Union, produced in the first settlers of Ten- nessee a singularly bold, hardy and patriotic people. They were, in the main, either pioneers or soldiers ; that indomitable race of men who planted civiliza- tion in the wilderness — the heroes of the axe and the rifle — or the patriotic officers and soldiers who constituted the continental line of North Carolina in the revolutionary war. But Tennessee received a curious compensation from North Carolina for the painful neglect she had suffered. It proved, indeed, a rich heritage. With a bankrupted treasury and an impoverished people, it was the policy of North Carolina to con- stitute her western territory a fund to reward the ^' signal bravery and persevering zeal " of her ofiicers and soldiers in the revolutionary war. The Act of Cession provided that the land laid off to the ofiicers and soldiers of her continental line should still 6 ANDREW JACKSON, enure to their benefit ; and if it should prove insuffi- cient to make good the several provisions for them, the deficiency might be supplied out of any other part of the Territory. And so liberally did she compensate her war-worn veterans out of this "fund," that more than 12,000,000 acres of the choice lands of the State were consumed in their pajanent. Not only was the military reservation exhausted, but practicalU' all her other lands sup- posed to be fit for cultivation that had not already been taken up on the occupancy and pre-emption claims of the hardy pioneers, whose rights were equalh^ protected by the Act of Cession, were like- wise consumed in satisfying warrants issued for military services. The result was that the great body of the land in Tennessee was originally granted, either under the occupancy claim of the pioneer settler, or upon the militar}' warrant of the revolutionary soldier.'^' Could there be a more favorable foundation for the development of the high degree of martial spirit and patriotic sentiment that has won for Tennessee the proud appellation of "Volunteer State"? Tennessee was the first Territory of the United States to be admitted into the Union as a State, and so far as I know, is the onl}^ one to assume that relation with any degree of reluctance. The vote * The Memorial of the General Assembly of the State of Tennessee to the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States in Congress assembled — Acts of i