JII5IL<^K^iy< re <2: ^cc'cg::: ^^^ICC' €M3^ %4 E...3J..T I .=^/.^ .M..^.^.:'^ ^ I UNITED STATES OP AMERICA. ^1 CM' ^(jitC^ < ^ \ % \^ \\ THE PROCEEDINGS OF A Convention of Delegates^ FROM THE STATES OF ^lASSACHUSETTS, CONNECTICUT, AND RHODE-ISLAND ; tHE COUNTIES OF CHESHIRE AND GRAFTON, jy THE STATE OF NEW-HAMPSHIRE t AND THE COUNTY OF WINDHAM, IN THE STATE OF VERMONT ,— CONVENED AT HARTFOItD, IN THE ^0 ' ^% STATE OF CONNECTICUT, S DECEMBER 15th, 1814. HARTFORD: j JPRINTED FOR ANDRUS AND STARR* 1815. 1 sn BEPORT, &c. THE Delegates from the Legislatures of the States of Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Rhode-Island, and from the Counlies of Grafton and Cheshire in the State of New-Hampshire and the County of Wind- ham in the State of Vermont, assembled in Conven- tion, beg leave to report the following result of their conference. JL HE Convention ds -deeply uTijoressctl with a sense of the arduous nature of the commission which they were appoint- «d to execute, of devising the means of defence against dan- gers, and of relief from oppressions proceeding from the act of their own Government, without vioUiting constitutional prin eiples, or disappointin^g the hopes of a suffering and injured people. To prescribe patience and firmness to those who are already exhausted by distress, is sometimes to drive them to despair, and the progress towards reform by the regular road, is irksome to those whose imaginations discern, and whose feelings prompt, to a shorter course. — But when abuses, re- duced to system and accumulated through a course of years have pervaded every department of Government, and spread corruption through every region of the State ; when these are clothed with the forms of law, and enforced by an Executive whose will is their source, no summary means of relief can be applied without recourse to direct and open resistance. This experiment, even when justiiiable, cannot fail to be painful to the good citizen ; and the success of the elTort will be no se- curity against the danger of the example. Precedents of re- sistance to the worst administration, are eagerly seized by those who are naturally hostile to the best. Necessity alone can sanction a resort to this measure ; and it should never he extended in duration or degree beyond the exigency, until the people, not merely in the fervour of sudden excitement, but after full delibepation, are determined to change the Constitu- tion. It is a truth, not to be concealed, that a sentiment prevails tQ no inconsiderable extent, that Administration have g-ivcn such constructions to that instrument, and practised so many abu- ses under colour of its authority, that the time for a change is at hand. Those who so believe, regard the evils which sur- round them as intrinsic and incurable defects in the Constitu- tion. They yield to a persuasion, that no change, at any time, or on any occasion, can aggravate the misery of their country. This opinion may ultimately prove to be correct. But as the evidence on which it rests is not yet conclusive, and as mea-. sures adopted upon the assumption of its certainty might be irrevocable, some general considerations are submitted, in the hope of reconciling all to a ccurse of moderation and firm- ness, which may save them from the regret incident to sudden decisions, probably avert the evil, or at least insure consola- tion and success in the last resort. The Constitution of the United States, under the auspices of a wise and virtuous Administration, proved itself compe- tent to all the objects of national prosperity, comprehended in the views of its framers. No parallel can be found in history, of a transition so rapid as that of the United States from the lowest depression to the highest felicity— from the condition of weak and disjointed republics, to that of a great, united, and prosperous nation. Although this high state of public happiness has under- gone a miserable and afflicting reverse, through the prevalence of a weak and profligate policy, yet the evils and affiiclicns which have thus been induced upon the country, are not peculiar to any form of Government. The lust and caprice of power, tjie corruption of patronage, the oppression of the weaker interests of the community by the strongerj heavy taxes, Avasteful expenditures, rind unjust sr.d ruinous wars, are the natural oHsprin^ of bad Administrations, in all ages and coqntries. It was indeed to be hoped, that the rulers of these States would not make such disastrous haste to in- volve their infancy in the embarrassments of old and rotten institutions. Yet all this have they done ; and their conduct calls loudly for their dismission and disgrace. But to attempt upon every abuse of power to change the Constitution, would be to perpetuate the evils of revolution. Again, the experiment of the powers of the Constitution, to regain its vigour, and of the people to recover frvp thirds &£■ both Houses, to interdict the com- mercial intercourse between the Ui)ited States undany foreign nation or the dependencies thereof. '^- £'ftJu Congress shall not make or declare war^ or author- ize act? of hostility .against any foreign nation without the con- /.currcnce of tAvp thirds of both Hovvse^, except suchacts ofhos- tii^ity 'l?c in defence of the territories of the United States ^yfl^en actiially inyadcd. Sixth. No person who shall hereafter be naturalized, shall b^ '.eligible a? a niember of the Senate or House of Representa- tives of the United States, nor capable of hoWing any civ,i.l of- fice under the authority of the United States. Serusnth. The sanje person shall iwt be elected Presidjent ijf the United States a second lime ; nor shall the Presideol: be elected from the same Slate two terms in succession. Resolved., That if the application of these States to the gQ- i:f,cnuicnt of the United States, recommended in a foi'cgoing SfisoJution, should be unsuccessful, and peace should not be eoHcluded, aixd the defence of these States should be neglectr cd, as it has been since the commencement of the war, it will in t!ve opinion of thia Convention be expedient for the Uegisla' iures of the s.everal States to appoint Delegates to another Con- vention, to meet at Boston, in the State of Massachusetts, on i.he third Thursday of June nest, v.ith such powers and ii> siriiciions as the exigency of a crisis so momentous i^ay ?P' «iuirc. Resolved, That the Hon. George Cabot, the Hon. Chaxm- cey Goodrich, and the Hon. £)ahicl Lyriiah, 6v any two of them, be authorized to call another meeting of this Convention, to be holden in Boston, at any time bdibre new Delegates shall be chosen, as recommended in the above Resolution^ if in tl>eir judgment the •situation of tlie Country shall urgently require it. Hartford, January 4th, 1814. GEOftGE CABOT, NATHAN DANE, WILLIAM PRESCOTT, HARRISON €f. OtfS, TI.MOTHY BIGELOW, JOSHUA THOMAS. SAMUEL S. WiLDE, JOSEPH LYMAN, STEPHEN LONGFELLOW, Jb. DANIEL WALDO, HODIJAH BAYLIES. GEORGE BLISS, €BJk\JSiCE¥ fiQODBlGH, JAMES HIiaiHOUSE. JOHN TREADWELL, ZEPHANIAH SWIFT, NATftANlEL SMITH, CALVIN GODDARD, ROGER M. SHERMAN, PANIKL LYAIAN, SAMUEL WARD, EDWARD MANTON. BENJAMIN HAZARD, Bfi^JAMIN WEST, M«,LS OLCOTTf , . WILLIAM HA)at^ Jb STATEMENTS, PREPARED AXD PUBLISHED BY ORDER OF THE CONVENTION OF DELEGATES, HELD AT HARTFORD, DECEMBER 15, 1814, AT«D FRINIED BY THEIR ORDER. SCHEDULE (A,) Shewing the ascertained expenses of the war, prior to July !, 1814. Military Department, or land forces, from January 1, to Sept. 30, 1812, including about six months of peace, and three months of war, in that year, ,,--.. ^7,464,81480 From Sept. 30, 1812, to Sept. 30, 1813, - 18,484,750 49 From Sept. 30, 1813, to Dec. 31, 1813, - 6,887,747 00 From Jan. 1, to July 1, 1814, - - - 11,210,238 00 Ascertained expenses of the Land forces from } hi .„ q^-^ rcQ oq Jan. 1, 1812, to July 1, 1814, ^ ^ ' ' J^fovy Defiartment, from Jan. 1, to Sept. 30, 1812, nbout six months of peace, and three months of war, the sum of . - - $ 2,638,612 95 From Sept. 30, 1 8 1 2, to Sept. > „ -^- ^^ 30, 1813, S ^'^^"''"' ~" FromSept.30, toDec.SMCl.'^, 1,248,145 10 From Jan. 1, to July 1, ICM, 4,012,899 90 ^_ 14,320,365 IS Ascertained war rxpenpes to July 1, 1814, $ 67,367,916 44 to which must be added, large sums not ascertained, and, also disbursements made by individual States, these must be more than 3,000,000 00 g 60,367,915 44 ./Vote.. ..The Military and Naval expenses of the United States from January 1, 1812, to June 18, 1812, when war was declared, are in- cluded in the above Acroimt, wd were, partly on account of the peace 29 establishment, and, in part, preparations for war. So that this enor- mous expenditure was incurred in the Military and Naval depart- ments alone, in two years of small warfare, and in six montlis that preceded it. SCHEDITLE (B,) Shewing the receipts at the Treasury of the United States from January 1, 1812, to July 1, 1814, including about 6 months of peace, and about two years of war, to wit — From Jan. 1, to Oct. 1, 1812, from the proceeds of the customs, the sales of land, &c. being tliree fourths of the revenue year, ^8,201,210 18 The balance in the Treasury charged this account, 3,947,818 36 On the 11 million loan under the act of March 14, 1812, 5,847,212 60 jgl7,996,241 04 Receipts from Oct. 1, 1812, to Oct, 1, 1813, to wit— From the proceeds of the customs^, ^12,696,491 55 Sales of land, - - - 830,671 53 Other items of revenue, - 140,879 35 - — 13,568,042 43 On account of the 11 million loan, ^4,337,487 50 On the 16 million loan, act Feb. 8,1813, - - - - 14,488,125 00 Treasury Notes issued on the act of June 30, 1812, - - - - 4,898,300 00 Do. do. act Feb. 25, 1813, ... - - - 253,000 00 23,976,912 50 Receipts from Oct. 1, 1813, to Jan. 1, 1814, to wit— From the customs and sales of lands, &c. ... - ^3,678,565 00 On the 16 million loan, - - 1,511,876 00 • On the seven and half million loan. 3.907,335 00 Treasury notes, - - - 3,778,700 00 12,076,475 00 Receipts from Jan. 1, to July 1,1814, to wit — From the proceeds tf the customs, ^4,182,088 25 Sales of public lands, - - 540,065 68 Internal duties and direct tax, 2,189,272 40 Postage and incidental receipts, 166,744 CO $7,076,170 3.-5 30 Off the 7 1-1 tBillioK loarii aet Aug. !^> 1813, - ^j692,665 On 10 million leafif (part of the 25 millions) - 6,087,01 1 Treasury netes on act F^eb. 25, m^, - - $i,oio,m Do. on act March 24, 1814, l,3$2ylCJ6 ^&j679j676 -2,46^,160-11,141,^76 00-19,219,^46 55 Deduct cash in the treasury, July 1, id 14, 87,637,617 30 ^82,914,957 98 Deduct payments made at the trea- sury in the same period from Jan. J, 1812, to July 1, 1814, to wit— The civil list, Indian department, &c. g4,697,872 ^ ^ Interast and principle of tlie public debt, 21,101,417 72-25,807,180 04 Lieft for war purposes in this period. ^557,107,77'? 94, jVoSj560 7,820,576 •^$475,77$ 10,777,709 12,846,530 13,668,223 1863, 1804f 1805, J806, f&07, 180§, 1810, 1811, 9 months of 1812, 11,064,067 il,«28,^7 13,560,66? ■ t5,959,95f > 7j773^f3 9,384,214 14,423,529 6,927,706 §215,786,783- 31 j\ote....As bonds were given for tbe duties, and they usually become payable the next year — the duties payable in any year, were, gene- rally, collected on the importations of the preceding year, as the f 17,060,661 received in 1808 were the duties on the great importa- tions of 1807, a iew small sums excepted. ^ote, a/so.. ..All these revenues arose from commerce, except $ 16,262,651. ' |t will be obsen'ed that all the sources of revenue exclusive of im- post and tonnage duties, did not, on an average, amount to quite one million of dollars a year ; so that the impost and tonnage duties, the four years preceding the long embargo, amounted to about fifty-eight millions of dollars, or to ^14,500,000 a year. And if there had been no embargoes or restrictions on commerce these would have increased, at least not decreased till the war was commenced. That commenced four years and a half after the embargo was laid. It will be seen that all the revenues amounted, in four years, before the embargo, to jj 62,579,274, and deducting for other sources of revenue, one million a year. There will remain ^ 58,579,274 received from imposts and tonnage duties : whereas in the three year* mA 5in$ months after the embargo was laid, all the levenufii, as ^bwe, gmpupt^d ogly t? $ 38,508,922, or at the rate of $ 40,817,^50 in fowT years ; bqt ia these four years were included, not only the ordinary million a year, but the two million direct tax of 1798, and th9 new internal duties of those four years, whence was collected at least Two million? and a half; hence deduct $6, 500,QQ0 from $40,817,990 leaves, received from impost and tonnage duties $ 34,317,990,— g 24,261,284 ie§s than was received in the four years preceding the embargo ; th^t i?, above six million a year, or above twenty-seven million^ for the f^yr years and a half, tbe restriftive system existed before {the war ; hence this siunwas clearly lost by ^'k& system... .See ^jfbedul/e F, Note, cdso....Thf said $ 16,262,^5.1 n4§ mc§iv?i^ thys, — f;oin in.- iernal revenue, ^6,460,003; dirept tftx, 1,757,240 ; sal^ pf l^md, $6,161,283 0?; postage of letters Ifc. j>6f7,34j; 9iJ!5\'8. 32 In tbe first Military District, at Boston, Portsmouth, Portland and Eastport, aggregate number 655 2 Military District at New-London, &c. 714 .3 do. at New-York, 2,116 . 4 do. at Fort Mifflin, &c. 308 do. at Baltimore, Norfolk, 2,244 6 do. North and South Carolina and Georgia, 2,244 7 do. at New Orleans, Mobile, &c. 2,378 Stationed on the sea board, 10,639 8 Military District at Detroit, Sandwich, &c. 2,472 S do. division of the right, 1 1 ,795 at Buffaloe, Sackets harbour, &c. • 6613 18,408 on the Canada line 20,880 total— 31,539 Piecruits enlisted from January 27 1814, to September 30, 1814, as by the return of the Inspector General were 13,898 : towit— in February 1814, 980 March „ 2,357 April „ 2,501 May „ 2,138 June ,, 1,446 July „ - 1,486 ■ August „ 1,687 -Sept. - „ 1,304 -13,898 ^ote.. .. An znay of 31,639, early in the year 1814, was, no doubt a much larger army than the United States kept up the two first years ■•f the war ; and if properly employed, 31,000 regular troops weri certainly adequate to oppose any force Great Britain, in those years, employed against the United States— ^31,000 men, according to the es- timates of the war and Treasury Departnaents, should not have cost tnore than 12 millions a year, or 24 millions in the two years ; vt'here- as the land forces did cost 46 millions and more, in the wasteful man- nor in which the war was conducted. JVote, also.... vf hen it is considered the United States had on the 1st ©f July 1814 a regular army of 31,539, and enlisted in 6 months, from February I,ta October 1, 1814, 13,898 men for what possible pretence can the national government have recourse to conscription, and nieasurv-^s destructive of the liberties of the people, to fill the ranks of the army, the course of enlistments amply prove, that if the army be well paid and supported, and according to contracts, there can be no occasion to resort to such violent measures. JVote, aiso.... of the 10,659 regular troops on ih? sea board. or)\y 1,3G9 were stationed in Nev/-England. 33 SCHEDULE (E.) Though the ^»perations of the war in 1781 and 178S wer« §f*5% especiaUy i» tlie Southern Slates, yet it cost America far less than fiF- teen millions a year, as will apjHjar by the public documents. ■ In 1782 Congress made an estimate for an army of 26,000 men. This estimate, which proved to be correct, was a little over eight millions ©f dollars. The individual States' expenses will be fownd not to have exceeded four millions a year, and Navy expenses were trifling. In 1781 tlie expenses were about three millions more than in 1782.-*- Prices were about the same then as now. The following is from tlie adoption Treasury Reports : an abstract of the expenditures of the United States of the Constitution, to Oct. 1, 1812, taken from Trior to 1792, $ 1,718.129 1803, 4,062,824 In 1793, 1,766,677 1804, 4,052,858 1793, 1,707,84.8 1805, 6,357,234, 1 794, 3,5(0.348 1806, 6,080,209 1795, 4,350,596 1 807, 4,984,572 1796, 2,551,930 1808, ■ 6504,338 1797, 2,833,590 1809, 7,414,672 1798, 4,623,823 1810, 5.311,083 1799, 6,480, 1 6G 1811, . 5,592 604 1800, 7,411.369 9monthsofl812, . 11,760,59? 1801 4,981 669 3,737,079 A U vf 1 f 1802, $ 108,102,221 JVo^ O ■— — Cn OS CS lO CO CO Oi' Ul C35 W lO i-T 03 CO CD -O Oi W to 03 M n\\ >-'l >-' k- to i-> 10 — to — ' CO g W CO « ^ *> p ?ji C-i C; ■£) — -» to (35 O CC Oi -■ >- *- M c^iiCi^too— 'rf^eti(atoi&.ooiec -^i w -^j lo lo i-o o v\ c6 co-'C5K)^i'-'»ococft — ocotocjo;— '-10 i-'-Jo>t^totoco.--^ic:c:icw — wcoeooo U4- ■fc|--M:j l>- k»- CO -J I g-r. 2. » » IT) m P 3 CL tr O ... ^ ^S'-g ^ t ^ s« * ££^ p re .«f,^^^ •-'-•to — tOiUit-. — tOCntO — — ^1 — J?""w-;05coa:tocjcoc5a5coj-cc — ►ucJl-^lo^^ — I Oi ,1 o g5 cji C;i CO to lU o CO — ic^ — o ~i to Cs? to 5 to — c >& ct to' »o CO CO CO C5 o CO CO to to cc CO o C3 — 10 Oi c to 00 05 to cooit^ow — CCC3C0 o toco tOOit^"-'''-— ^(C^JMW COOl CO CO ia > CO ^ CT — I CO to CO CO ~i C .1 — Oi — ■—to— 'tOC5COCf54-tOCOCfo toMic>o — Oi — a>cDc»coc5c^cc sil IT; Ml "> o ? p 2 to C5 fO c ^11 tc ■35 to o CO o — (35 Cji C^i i£» CO to in to CC tn -J *. (75 05 Oi -J to »o it» t;n — •^1 i^iCOOtOCn — OtOCnCO — ^tn *» — CD — locr — tOCOCO^itnWCOCJCO tOt^i to — i^COtfi — *.— ^lOCCOClC003tO — o:*- — cjicoe50i(050cntocoo — oooios co co — *» to C5 CO O CO CO — M *i O C3 Cn ifc» rfi. O CJ C: CO — C iC»005C^OS'^>C505 — COl0050iC005^0inC» tn 03 CROSS TOT A L-Colls. 2,212,491 73| 36 \ SCHEDULE (H.) This shews the great increase of the commerce of tlie IJniW Slates, under federal administrations when it was free. Aso its grea* diminution under embargoes, restrictions and war. 2. The compara- tive exports of the several States from time to time. 3. The kind of exports, as articles domestic or foreign, as productions of the forest, o( agriculture, of the sea, &c, 1. The exports of the United States every fifth year, to wit — 1791, $ 17,571,551 45 1796, 67,064,097 00 1801, 93,020,513 00 1806, 103,787,000 00 1811, 61,317,833 00 Exports of the United States four years next preceding the long embargo, vi2. 1804, ^77,701,597 1805, 96,566,021 1806, as above, 103,787,000 IdQl, 108,343,358 JVo-' ■-' '^ ^j .^ s; &) - c- o 2 ^ (V >o ^o 5>0 I*! -t 3 «. ~3 J5 *» fO 01 *» »-0 Oi CO >*>• W •o^^ n o *- — =; 3 *- 4- 2 "^ O^ .si -! a> •*_ ,» *^ -^ CO CO cc ^ ~i cn (-» :?. O^ CO < ■^k w .foloK>>r' ^ — O COhSCOCOCOCOOS H- ►pi.oi 01 CD oi 10 "^ ~J J^ i° i^ J^ i^ Lj O *-o lo ^ "o "^ -J Cn "cc 60 C5 >— ta CO o ^j 05 *^ *o ^ ^ cooi>*'05^c;'~-'*~0'^°oW 60 ^i c; p — c cc CO 00 O — CO 5 — o ^i — > o en ;0 M o 3- 8 CO to CD Oi r* ^ ^ OS CD Cn 09 03 OO = CO CD Ox >^ K> •- — 60 ~j-joo^oii^ -4-ao w rfi.COOiCOO^T!^3 05 — CO q oo^oiOO^-wjsct'p C0OC0OOO054i.Cn05 t©OiO5O^O56©"^O'C0C< CO CO 03 CO 60 "^ -O r-0 (-0 a. a. o o S'^^a.co-c.c-D-c-Q-ccs-fi- poooooooooooo G- Crt c 3 3 1^ 3 f6 o «o fo oi £ Ci Oi Oi — iS ^ C CO 00 05 CO -* o c o o g S O o o © © J^ '3M 3. "The kind of exports from the United States, as articies domestic or foreign ; productions of the forest, agriculture, of the sea, &.c. Prod. of the. forest, of the se.1, Year 1804 4,-600,000 3,420,000 of agriculture, 50,890,000 ofmanufadt. Miscellaneous, 2,100,000 430,000 41,440,000 •roreign articles, - ;36,231,597 Year 1805.1 5,2G1,000J 2,884,000: 31,552,000| 2,525,00o! I55,000i Year 1806 4,861,000 3,116,000 32,375,000 2,707,000 445,000 42,387,000 43,504,000] 48,700,000 53, 170,021 1 60,283,000 59,643,578 108,343.558 Year 1807. 5,476,000 2,804,009 37,832,000 2,120,000 468,000 (77v671, 597195,566,02 l;i 03,787,000 This sta'teinent shews that about three fourths of the domestic exports «xf the United States are the produce of agriculture, and for four years -prior to the embargo, exceeded on an average, 33 millions a year. It will readily be Feen what great losses there must have been in re- gard t>i. ](^:Cj^^S<^^ jC,<^' <2a «cr mK cm^ ^Mli' ' iWiil|ii|i < ' * 4f CI /^: '(gee: ■ -