E A4e /mt f&f^ ^/dl^y^^' h, L E T T E T^"^ 'i^r^', THE PRESENT CRISIS; ADDRESSED T« HON. GILMAN MARSTON, Pcmbcr sf (Touqrrss frim Xlcfa-liumpsbire, BY NATHANIEL G. UPHAM, FEBEUAIIY 2f, 18G1 C ® X ( * HI) : STEAM niESS QF :SI(FAULAND & JENKy. 1861. / ^ u ^ S */ Aj jt^AS^. / ^/&^ LETTER Concord, February 20, 1861. Hon. Gilman Marston ; My dear Sir — I partly promised I would write you. on my retuin, in reference to tlie impressions received from my visit to "Washington, and as to the present crisis in our National Affairs. There has been no time since the organization of the government when a fidl and free interchange of opinion has been of more importance than now, or when greater unanimity of sentiment was to be desired in regard to the course of action to be pursued. LOVE 01' THK UXIOX FORGOTTEN IN TJIE GROWTH OF SEC- TIONAL PARTIES. You will readily agree with me, I tliinlv, that the love of the Union is deeply implanted in the hearts of our people : yet it is manifest that, for a series of years, a course of political policy has been adopted in different sections of our country, whose practical consequences have l)een in open conflict with this feeling. Parties, sectional in their character, have grown up at the North and South, and a new confederated gov- ernment has Ijeen recently installed, claiming to exer- cise an independent sovereignty, and ready for the issue of war with the remaining States. Under these circumstances the inquiries — How this state of things has been brought about, and What is to be the remedy, are questions which deeply agitate the pubHc mind. It is quite clear that there has been no deliberate, preconceived design, on the part of the North to orig- inate any system of measures to destroy the Union — nothing intended to effect such a result ; and yet the calamity is forced upon us by the South as a retalia- tory measure, and we are now awaiting the sober, deliberate judgment of the people whether such an act shall be permitted. But, admitting there was no such design, it is con- tended by the South that measures have been taken of such oppressive character, and so destructive of the equal rights of their section, as to compel a sepa- ration. ADEQUATE REMEDIES WITHIN THE CON^STITUTION FOR ALL COMPLAINTS MADE. It is a sufficient answer to such allegations, that, if any wrongs have been committed, tlie Constitution itself furnishes a remedy. There are at least two sufficient means of redress of such grievances, before it can be necessary to resort to the measure of an overthrow of the government. We can appeal to the calm, deliberate decision of our National Judi- ciary, Avhose duty it is to construe the Constitution according to the original intent and design of its framers. We also have the power of frequently recurring appeals to the people, the ultimate effect of whose suffrages may be relied upon to insure redress of every wrong which is now complained of Over and aljove these reasons for forljearance from violent action, the section of country from which these complaints originate had, for the time being, the power of the House of Representatives and the Senate, and the claimed judgment of the Judiciary to support them in the practical enjoyment of their rights. There was, therefore, no great emergency pressing upon them, and no immediate danger that could arise from delay. The rendition of fugitive slaves had, for the most part, been enforced, and up to the period of secession the entire territory of the Union was open to the occupation of the slaveholders where there was the least probability that slavery could ever prevail. Under such circumstances as to the nature of the grievances complained of, the absence of all imme- diate necessity of action, and the plain and evident means of redress yet unexhausted, there can be no question but history and posterity will pronounce their deliberate judgment that there was no justifiable pretence to cause a dissolution of the Union. ALIEXATION OF FEELINO. But there is another view of the existing contro- versy, that tends fiir more, in my belief, to justify and sustain the Southern people in their course than any ground yet alleged. They contend, with great force and justice, that in order to constitute United States we must be a united people. They say they participated witli us in the war of the Revolution, and in tlie subsequent formation of the Constitution, on terms of jjcrfect equality, and with mutual feelings of union and harmony. That 6 this union of feeling has passed away ; that an habit- ual crusade has been preached against them as slave- holders, to destroy their political equality ; that mur- derous raids have been promoted within their States ; that their servants are stolen through the agenc}^ of regularly organized northern associations ; that they are denounced extensivel}^ at the North as thieves and murderers, and the risino; o;eneration are tauQ-ht to regard them as such ; and that the whole spirit and tenor of the farewell words of Washington, incul- cating union and love among us as one people, has been persistently and wantonly violated by inspiring sectional divisions and hatred : and thus the Union has been virtuall}^ dissolved by us, and is now merely declared to be so by them, after all hope of mutual peace and harmony has ceased. They omit to say, that very many of these acts were occasioned by their own unwarrantable and aggressive spirit on the subject of slavery ; but, inde- pendent of this, and of the fact that slavery must always constitute a subject of moral consideration, there is very much for serious consideration in these assertions ; and if in the future, as recently in the past, political harangues on slavery are to keep the public mind in a constant state of excitement and anxiety, and are to form the continual theme and ele- ment of party strife and commotion, it is indeed time that a Union composed of such discordant materials should be dissolved, and that there should be a final separation between us, as hopelesslj' conllicting and irreconcilable communities. But we think a careful examination of the circumstances under which these feelings have been caused, and of the crisis through which the country is now passing, will satisfy us that there is no necessity of any such result. CAUSES OF ALrKXATIOX OF FKHLIXd PASSING AWAY. It should be borne in mind that the whole question of slavery, so far as it has been made a matter of political discussion, has originated from our acquisi- tion of new territories, and that, precisely so far as the position of those territories has been settled and determined, the causes of such discussion have, to that extent, been diminished. The occasions, then, for controversy on this subject are rapidly passing away, Avitli a result as favoraljle to Southern acquisition of power as could reasonably have been anticipated. From our newly acquired territories, the South has gained the Stq,(;es of Flor- ida, Louisiana, Arkansas, Missouri and Texas ; the latter embracing sufficient area for three or four States. It would seem as if these acquisitions should be satisfactory to her. The location and topograph- ical formation of our remaining territory, exclusive of the portion of country guaranteed to our Indian population, present a final barrier to the farther extension of slavery within our present limits, and it may be regarded as a fixed fact — that there will never be a second tier of slave States west of the Missis- sippi, or north of the present limits of Texas. There has l)een no basis of compromise presented to heal our present dissensions that would, in the end, prevent this result. The l)Ounds and limits of farther slavery extension in this country are fixed by laws and circumstances anterior to and superior to the mere effect of legislative enactment. The territory adapted to slavery is now so reduced, if indeed any be left, that hardly any final arrangement which can be made in the adjustment of our present difficulties, can help the South or harm the North. Under such circumstances, with a reasonable degree of conciliation, it might seem that the bitter personal and party feuds that now exist would cease, as soon as it became fully, and clearly understood, that the causes of them had terminated. We may hope much, moreover, from the fact that we have learned something of the exceeding danger of bitter sectional denunciation. Its injustice and fearful consequences are becoming recognized, and the words of Washington are beginning to be heard, as he points, over the long vista of our history, to the yawning gulf to which we are hastening. Our people, who have been so prone to repent of other people's sins, are beginning to realize that, placed in the posi- tion of our Southern brethren, they would be very much like them, and that they can hardly exult much longer in their self-righteousness, that they are not like this slaveholder. They begin to see that meas- ures of Christian reform must be supported with a Christian feeling and spirit ; and already symptoms are apparent that charity and brotherly love are about supplanting a reign of discord and hate. SOUTHERN SECTIONAL FEELING. Our Southern brethren should also remember, while complaining of the North as sectional, that the controversy has not been on one side merely. As the strength of the Democratic party declined in the Free States, its power became concentrated at the South, so as to bo almost entirely under Southern govern- ance and lead. Its control, therefore, was sectional, and its sectional antagonism has, more than any thing else, called forth a like si)irit at the North. Both parties have been alike in fault. TRUE POLICY OF THE SOUTH AS TO SLAVERY EXTENSION. * . . It was a great mistake in Southern policy to attempt to carry the institution of slavery into debat- able territory. It should be a maxim of the true slaveholder every where — to scorn the desire of the introduction or maintenance of slavery in any section of territory where the spontaneous will of the people is not ready to sustain and encourage it. It was a blunder, and, so far as fraud was put in requisition to sustain it, a crime, to attempt to fix on Kansas an institution where its growth could only be weak and sickl}^ and it could never exist except by a continual, and, in the end, hardly doubtful conllict. It is b}^ fighting the battle unnecessarily and impoliticly, in such remote outposts, that slavery has been compelled to tremble in its very citadel and strongholds, where, without such foolish peril, it had been politically im- pregnable. We have mutual lessons to learn from the sad teachings of our present experience, and it is to be hoped that neither party is so Bourbon-like as not to profit by them. TENDENCIES OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY. Alarm has been expressed at the general tendencies of the Republican party, and there would be ground for alarm if, in the new phase of its position, it should attempt to govern and control in the ultra sectional 10 spirit in wbicli it lias won its way to power. But much toleration must be extended to the aggressive movements of an attacking party. When such a part}' assumes the reigns of government and the responsibilities of power, it necessarily changes its character ; its tendencies and necessities become con- servative ; it stands by, and acts with, and under the Constitution ; and Avith such tendencies, and with the manifestly large mass of conservative men in the Republican party, who, from choice, will aid in giving it this direction, it may well be questioned whether there is any just ground of apprehension. At any rate, very soon the only actual strife and issue before the people will be, What party shall first gain the hearts and confidence of the people as a truly Na- tional Union party ; and, unless the Republicans shall attain to that position, their hold on power is lost. There is nothing, then, in the acts complained of, in the apprehensions excited, or the alienation that exists, to justify the awful calamity that is bringing unparalleled distress upon this country, and that appalls the whole civilized world with its crime and w^rong. TRUE CHARACTER OF SECESSION. But it is said, by the present head of the new Confederacy, that this is a mere " secession" of States that have reverted back to their right of self-govern- mentj and " that it is by an abuse of language that their act has been denominated a revolution," and " that within each of the States its government has remained." No one denominates this movement, as yet, as a 11 revolution, and no one is deceived as to the character of the movement, by the assertion that the exercise of the h>c