^o ^vP.^* «*.Mll»V ^ .r ^*i O. » IV/ -M„-=7» ;i ^0 -7'. * ■ \V) ° A. O ' '^' • I •< ■I ^^^--- .<^ ... ^^^ '-'- ^^^ ^^ C^ c"" 4 o * -^ ^ v^ ^L *" "o, ►* .G^ \p^ 7* <\ 4 O ^' >P^4^. :d fe.. ^'o,." .G^ V> */T^T* .A, " ' * V V * '■ i-^ V » A q -<^ ^.'^ ■/^ <^ * O « O ' -^^ ^S-. c'^ "w" >^"^, o » o . .»'' ,G^ \3 *0^s* A <. 'o.»' .G^ "^ 1>V u. — tN ■*■ SPlil//y'2j _ "V -n^^o^ ^ t"^ -. *' <\ ^^ -o. * r*^^ r> ^. ^-^^^«^ ^^ 4 O o. f; .s^^ ;*i^,^- ' . ^ ©li •:• ^©rfagj® ■> ®®ai BY PI. G. ^^TJlx&Tl, M. E). \ Read before the Chautauqua County Society op History and Natural Sciences, at Gkeenhurst, on Chautauqua Lake, Sept. 24, 189t). Published iii\THS Fbedomia Censob, January, 1891. ijg^gj^^g^rg^n Class iBook- ^M <^M %1JW) I / .ClTa. CVJ* THE OLD PORTAGE ROAD. An Eakly Attempt by the French to Establish Military Posts in Chautau- qua County, and a Military Portage Road from Lake Erie to Lake Chautauqua. [By H. C. Taylor, M. D., Brocton, N. Y,] As to the location and opening of a Portage road from Lake Erie at or near Barcelona to Lake Chautauqua at or near Mayville, previous to the settlement of the county by the whites, there seems to be little doubt. Its course was plainly to be traced, and the fact generally con- ceded. Even at this day there are traces of its existence, less strongly marked, 'tis true, for as in all things earthly, this work of an earlier era, under the etceteras of civi'ization and the ever effacing hand of time, is fast losing its distinctive features. Its starting point was on the west side of Chautauqa creek at Barce lona, within a few rods of the lake. Its course from this point was south- erly along the bank of the creek, passing the afterward location of the first grist mill built in the county, by John McMahan, not far from the mouth of the creek, in 1804 or 1805, reached and crossed the now main road at the ancient cross roads, one mile west of the centre of the village of West- field, at the monument erected there a tew years since by Hon. E. T. Foote. (1870.) From this point by a south easterly course ii soon roach- ed the steep bank of the creek Chau- tauqua, along which it ran for a mile when it passed into a deep gorge of a bundled feet or more in depth, through which the creek ran, by an extensive dugway still plainly to be seen on the lands owned by Miss Elizabeth Stone, where it crossed the creek and by another dugway on lands for many years owned by Wm. Cum- mings, it reached the high banks a few rods from the present Glen Mills. The passage of this gorge was a work of considerable magni- tude. The west bank was so very precipitous that the passage of teams would seem nearly impossible, yet it is said that in later years, be- fore the road on the east side of the creek through the now village of Westfield was opened, vast quanti- tities of salt and merchandise were transported oyer it from Lake Erie to Lake Chautauqua for Pittsburgh and other points in the Ohio Valley. On the east side of the gorge the road was less precipitous and is now a public highway. After reach- ing a point above Glen Mills on the south side of the gorge through which the east branch of the Chau- tauqua creek now runs, and where the Mayville road is now located at that point, to avoid the rugged sec- tion over the hill it passed up the east branch for some distance and continued to the east of the present thoroughfare to Mayville, and reach- ed Chautauqua lake at or near the present steamboat landing. My own — 2- knowledge of the existence of this old road was acquired in the winter of 1827-28. In the spring of 1827 my father removed with his family from New England to Fredouia in this county. I was then a lad of thirteen. We had almost for our next door neighbor Col. James Mc- Mdhan, the first actual settler in Chautauqua county. He kept a tav- ern on the west hill, and the bar room was often the resort of an evening of neighbors and friends with a slight sprinkling of young America, and at that day I had the honor of being known among the latter. Mr. McMahan was a fine type of the pioneer settler and a genial gentleman. It needed but a hint to set him olf into a recital of scenes and incidents of early life in Chautauqua, while yet a part of Genesee. I remember well how he would sit for an hour, possibly with his head inclined, his l)road and massive chin resting nearly upon his breast, gazing intently into the fire, stoves had not yet been iutroduced, and as if entirely unconscious of the presence of others and in his own peculiar style, relate facts and as sociations of his life of hardship and toil of 24 years on his farm near Westheid, and for some j-ears earlier as a surveyor in this and adjoining counties, but mostly in western coun- ties of Peunsyivania. [Mr McMa han passed through this county as a surveyor as early as 1795.J He seem ed happy in living over again all that had entered into his life duriug those \ ears. He often spoke of the old road, giving an accurate discrip- tion of it the entire length, and stat- ed that it was in use, more or less, when he came to this county as a settler in 1802, for the transporta- tion of salt and merchandise from Portland harbor to Mayville for the Alleghany and Ohio valleys, and con- tinued to be in use until 1805, when the route was changed to the east side of the creek. (The Portage Road as now known through West- field was surveyed by James Mc- Mahan in August 1805, and legally located the same month by road commissioners Thomas McCIintock and James Dunn.) To all these re- citals I was more than a willing lis- tener. The impressions I received are as vivid today as they were the next hour, and they have remained with me as some pleasant memory. The road was then, 1827, plainly to be seen at intervals and could be traced nearly its entire length, espe- cially the northern portion from the lake to the foot hills In his location of the road Mr. McMahan incidentally mentioned the fact that the first cemetery in the county for the burial of the whites was placed on this road, north of the ancient cross roads, on the west side, between the present main road and the L. S. & M. S. K R. tracks. In after years after my venerable friend had returned to Westfield I made a critical survey of the road myself, with an interest that it would be difficult for me to describe ; and in the month of June of the present year I again looked the ground over and noted the changes time had wrought. There being no doubt as to the existence of the road in question, it will be the object of this paper to make answer to the following, viz : Who were the projectors of the road ? Who its builders "? When built 1 and for what purpose ? The popular theory that the French du- ring their efforts for supremacy on this continent, at some time and for some specific purpose, had construct- ed this highway through the forest, however true, lacked authentic evi- dence. Positive data seemed to be lacking, but certain facts exist and they are abundant, which in a very lary[e de";ree warrant inferences that reasonably and properly take their -3— places in our mind as facts. 1 shall improve upon such evidences as I have been able i o collect, and present such facts and associations as seem pertinent and such as have found a place in my note book through the years of the past. From my boyhood up, I have noticed that in discussions touching this question, the impres siou has always obtained, that what- ever the object of construction it was one looking to sotae great achievement, some great scheme con- templated or in process of lulfillment, or both, and that in connection with it something doubtless did occur of vast importance, and that possibly had a bearing in shaping the destmy of the race on this continent. In this effort I desire to acknowledge my indebtedness to the late Hon. E. T. Foote for valuable information first brought to my notice, in con- nection with the road in question, by him, and published by the Fredonia Censor in Feb., 1871. [Affidavit Stephen Coffen, Col. Records State of New York, vol. 6, page 834.] Aside from this letter whatever I present will be gleanings from vari- ous sources. In order to a proper understand- ing of the question as 1 discuss the propositions named, it will be neces- sary to step backward as to time and for a few moments trace the claims of the English and French, respect- ively, to territory in the new world. You will all remember tbe historic fact that James the First, of Eng- land, claimed, by right of discovery, a large proportion of the North American continent Uuder this assumption, or presumption, as you please, for the purpose of planting and extending settlements in the western world, he granted to the London and the Plymouth com- panies in England bv letters patent, in 1606, certain rights and privileges to all that portion of tbe continent extending from the 34th to the 45th deg. of north latitude inclusive, or a strip of territory 660 miles wide, and extending from the mouth of Cape Fear river in North Carolina to Hali- fax in Nova Scotia, and from the Atlantic to the Pacific oceans, includ- ing little less than two million?, six hundred and fifty-six- thousand five hundred square miles. This was a vast territory, and it is not probable that King James, or the members of these companies, or any one of them, had even a remote idea of its extent. Of course our own county and State were included in this grant. Under these and some subsequent grants of less magnitude, settlements were made in Virginia in 1607, in Massa- chusetts in 1620, in Connecticut in 1630, in New Hampshire in 1622, in Rhode Island in 1636. New York was settled by the Dutch in 1614, and ceded to the English in 1664 ; and from these and other special permits, or grants, other settlements were formed, until the entire sea- board from Maine to Florida was occupied. The large centers of population were upon the seaboard, but smaller settlements were pushed westward with vigor until the flood of emigra- tion began pouring over the crest of tbe Alleghanies, and adventurous traders were located at every conve- nient post on the tributaries of the Upper Ohio, and it was the design to open up the vast territories be- yond the mountains and secure the profits of a trade with tbe natives. JBeside this and an overweaning am- bition for territory and for building up a vast dependency of the English crown, as time passed on, from the turn of affairs it was more than pos- sible that their old enemy on the northern border would attempt an occupancy of territories claimed by them — the English — west of the mountains, and strong efforts were made to make good their own pre- sumptive title. France, from the first discoveries in America, had not been an idle _4_ spectator. She, too, was ambitious of Empire. Iq 1G03 the King of France granted to De Monts, a dis- tinguished Frenchman and a gentle- man of hirge means, the sovereignty of the entire country from the 40th to the 46th deg. of north latitude, or from one deg. south of New York City to one deg. north of Montreal. He sailed from France with two small vessels in the spring of 1G04, and in May made a landing in Nova Scotia. After trafficing with the natives through the season he spent the winter on a small island off the mouth of the River St. Croix, on the coast of New Brunswick, in a small fort hastily constructed by him. In the spring of 1G05 De Monts removed to a point on the Bay of Fundy on the west coast ot Nova Scotia, and planted the first permanent settle- ment of the French in America, calling it Port Royal, now called Annapolis — thus antedating the settlement of Virginia by the English two years — and giving the general name of A- cadia to that peninsula. New Bruns wick, and the adjacent islands. De Monts returned to France and three years after, or in 1608, by pei mis- sion fitted out a second expedition for the traffic in furs with the natives on the River St. Lawrence, and dele- gated the command to Samuel Champlain, who had before visited that section. In June of that year Champlain, after visiting various sections, landed at a point five miles above the Isle of Orleans, where he founded a settle- ment which eventually became tlie city of Quebec. This was the first permanent settlement in New France or Canada. After the fi)unding of Quebec, settlements were planted in various sections of Acadia and Canada in lapid succession. From the first permanent settlements of the English in Virginia and the French in Acadia and New France these two nations were parallel pow- ers in the American continent. The French, however, were singularly unfortunate in many of their move- ments, but with a perseverance worthy of commendation they con- tinued lo extend their limits and planted settlements over a vast extent of teritory. A trading post was planted at Mackinaw in 1667, at Detroit in 1670, at Niagara in 1679, and others were planted far into the western wilds, at Vincennes, Indiana, and at Kaskaskia in Illinois. They had also flourishing settlements in the northern border of the Gulf of Mexico. The English claimed teri- tory from the Atlantic to the Pacific Ocear, under letters patent, as we have seen, but the French, not recognizing, of course, any grant by the English sovereigns, claimed terri- rory by rights of exploration and possession, and planted their stand- ard where it pleased them best. Please bear in mind the location of the settlements of these two powers on the continent, say in 1744, at the opening of King George's war, for they remained relatively nearly the same, the English along the Atlantic seaboard mostly, but pushing west- ward and over to the Alleghanies, and to the great lakes; the French along the gulf and river St. Law- rence, and in a decided sense pushed westward to the great lakes and along the streams that fall into the gulf of Mexico, with a few flourish- ing settlements along the gulf. With us even at thia distance of time it is not difficult to imagine the spirit of jealousy and rivalry that existed between these two nations in regard to their western possessions. It is Haid that the statesman of each very well knew at this time and for many years earlier had known, that the time was approaching when this jealousy would culminate in a fierce struggle that would decide the su - premacy ever these western posses- sions. Ajs earlv as 167S that farsighted and intrepid French explorer. La Salle, suggested to the French gov- ^ninent not onlv the desirabilitv bat the vast importance of a onion of Canada widi the Talley of the Miggiwdj ipi bj a line of military poets or forts, as a secnritj against the English and their advancing Bettle- ments aiong the seaboard and the eastern sloDe of the AUeghanies, and the government for a long series of years designed earrring this sagges- tion into efEeet, bat from exigencies occurring at home in the diapeof jealonsies and wars with their old rival, it was put over from time to time and it was not until 1722 that they came to feei the absolute reces- sity of a movement toward its aeoom ididmient. In this OHyvement it was the design on the part of the Freoeh to isolate the English settl^nents and coaSne them east of Uie All^;faany mountains — cut them off from the vast territnies on the west oi the mountains, and from the loerative trade with the natives inhabiting those seetJowR. Of course the Bng- lidi would not consult to be thus heouned in and confined to a narrow strip of tesritoiy eomparativdy along the seaboard, with their large ideas and pride of Empire^ In 1722, as I in- timated, eommeoeed a greut m litary strife, yet without actual dedaratkm of war for sooae years, that was 5t at Oswego on Lake Ontario. [The Fort was not bnUt until 1727.]" This doubtless was the reason of Fort Niagara be- ing verv soon thereafter reconstruct- ed and reoccupied, oi in 1""25 This seemed also a favorat n^r-t in the matter of carrying out tiieir de- sign of uniting their Canadian poaseaBMms with the Ohio Yall^ and their settlen-ents beJow. by way of Niagara, Lake Erie, and some carry, ing place between that lake and the streams running south from the great waterdied along the southern shore of L-^V'^ T" '-'<=- The English oocapaLjj acent s^tle- ments were the move- ment cc ;■ 1 . r oe delayed with safe' The P^ngiiwh must be '.■: .: .i^ A_ rghanies, or the 1- rth- dre^^ Tes to the task with a ^ .of sagaei^ and vigor. " ther long dday, :: __- .__. - will not now stop to disfcuss, and it was not until 17:»2 that the first ei^editMm to operate westoflKagara was fitted ooL The Harqnis Doqneene bad bem appoint- ed governor of Canada and arrived that year, 17o2.and at cmee eommene- ed his mJe by a grand miUtary review. He was poa^oos in his beazing and in a very marked degree failed of securing the re^ieet ci the yeofAe, only such reqieet was aetorded him as he eompelied by haraii The entapcise nponwhiefa be about to enter waa very onpopalar with the aaiU&en amd the people and load cries of diseoiitait were heard OD ererv hard ar-J f '.rc^ of a ribald — 6— character, in which the names of the Governor and his advisers were in- geniously made a part, were boister- ously sung on the streets of Quebec, and the ma'contentswerecniy quieted and made to obey the orders of their superiors by an arrest and incarcera- tion of some of the leaders. Gov. DuQuesne had undertaken a vast en- terprise, but he did not seem to realize its immensity and the dan- gers from various sources that would surround it, especially from the evil designs of the ambitious and un- principled adventurers of his own military household. He was warned by the Colonial Minister, M. Ro- uille, with reference to the establish- ment of military posts iu Ohio, "that no private or unworthy motives on the part of others be allowed to influence him," but this seemed the one favor- able opportunity of a long series ot years and he could not well resist the temptation to attempt carry- ing out the scheme so long had in contemplation, though his van guard consisted of but 250 men, whereas his original plan called for 700 men ; and it is quite possible that he did not scrutinize as closely as he ought the motives and conduct of some of his officers; if he had some serious disasters might possibly have been avoided, for it is true "that every military movement, and above all the establishment of every new post, was an opportunity to official thieves with whom the colony swarmed." Beside the personal ambition of Gov. DuQuesne there was another motive that seemed to call for immediate action. The Euglish settlements were advancing rapidly as we have se^n, bat a s' range ne^.lect en the pirt of the oro visional asserablies had actually left thtm without pro- teciion. and tb3 entire western slope of tbe Alleghaaii'S and the valley of the Ohio wou.d be an ensy acquisi- tion. The Governor was proud to believe that he was the chosen ves- sel to direct and carry out this vast enterprise and secure for his King and country millions of square miles of territory and untold wealth, and- that his own brow, for his faithful- ness and zeal, would be crowned with the chaplet of fame. Duriog the fall and early winter the preparations for the expedition to La Belle Riviere were proceeded with, with as much expedition as the lim- ited resources of the colony would allow, and on the first of January, 1753, the first division was ready to move. Just here, in order to an under standing of the discussion of the question in hand, I must be allowed to introduce an abstract of an affida- vit made by Stephen Coffen, a mem- ber of this expeditiou, before Sir William Johnson, a member of the Nevv' York Council, in 1754, and but a few years since, 1871, brought to no- tice by Hon. E, T. Foote, while sear- ching ancieno documents relating to the colonial history of New York, lo which I once referred. It furnishes the only clue we have as a s'arting point as to the old road iu question, and as the route of the expedition as originally designed, lay through a portion of our county, I will be pardoned I know if I present an ab- stract of considerable extent, as I am able to do, the affidavit lying before me. Who was Stephen Coffen ? April 11, 1713, a treaty of peace was con- cluded at Utrecht in Holland, be- tween England and Prance, whereby England obtained control of the fisheries of Newfoundland and Labra- dor, and the whole of Nova Scotia was ceded to the British Crown. The goverument by the Eughsh of the territory acquired wa^j little else, ho\ 'ever, than a military occup ition, and that confined to the southern poi tion of the peninsula. Nine teui^hs and more of the inhabitants were French, sympathized with and rendered aid to them whenever oc- casion occurred. Annoyances to the — 7— English for a series of years were con tinuous, and misfortunes from this source were of frequent occurrence. The French were desirous of regain- ing this territory and entered upon this course of annoyance and a sys- tem of encroachments, to stili farther narrow down the English occupation, so that at some favorable moment they might wipe out the garrison at Port Euyal and rid themselves of troublesome neighbors. A letter from the Governor of Canada to the minister of War of the home goverment [Journal, Paris Doc. Vol. 10. P. 89.] speaks of the neces- sity of again acquiring the lost ter- . ritory, of the loyalty of the people, that they were able and willing to turnisb a large portion of the supples necessary for the subsistence of the troops who might occupy the coun- try, at least all the northern portion of it, as occasion seemed to them necessary. This the settlers did in opposition to all treaty stipulations. In all the wars between England and France, the colonies of both nations on this continent were as a matter of necessity involved, and various ex- peditions on the part of the English colonies were from time to time fitted out and did good service toward checking the aggrebsious of the French. The state of affairs being as we have seen, to counteract the mischief being done, the colonies un- der the direction of the home govern- ment, or at least at their suggestion, fitted out an expedition of 500 men, almost entirely from New England, in the fall of 1746, placed it under the command of Col. John Graham, a native of Massachusetts, [Col. Hist. Paris, doc. vol. 10, P. 90. Also Haliburton's Nova Scotia, vol. 1, P. 139] and Lieut. Col. Arthur No- ble of the famous Waldo regiment at the siege of Louisburgia iu 1745. [Col. history. Paris, Doc. yol. 10, page 93.] The expedition was sent by water to Port Royal, i^AnnapoUs), and from there overland in the mid- dle of a severe winter (Jan. 1747) to the town of Minas, situated at the head of Minas Basin, an arm of the bay of Fundy, and in the very heart of the peninsula. This town was located in the center of a vast- territory inhabited by an industrious and thrifty population, intensely loyal to the French crown, and also under the control of a considerable force of the royal troops. A journal of occurrences in Canada by Sieur Cheron, characterizes this move- ment on the part of the English as the boldest movement of the war. The object of this expedi- tion was to build block houses and form a permanent location, overawe the people and effectually seize upon all the military posts belonging to the French, intercept supplies, etc. Their movements were well known by the French, but the expedition reached its destination without mo- lestation. Before a blockhouse could be built, however,or other place of security prepared, they were at- tacked by French troops under Capt. Coulon, Feb. 11, 1747. They took refuge in the few houses of the town, but were eventually overcome, 70 [The French claim'ed 130 killed.] were killed and the balance taken prisoners. Of the latter was Stephen Coffen. Mr. Coffen took refuge in a house with Lieut. Col. Noble, who was killed during the engagement, and four others, Lieutenants Leche- mere, Jones and Pickering and En- sign Noble. [Halibuiton's Nova Scotia, vol. 2, p. 132.] From here we will allow Mr. Coffen to tell his own story as contained in his depo- sition to which I have referred : COFFEN 'S AFFIDAVIT. Stephen Cofl'en deposes and says that he was taken prisoner by the French and Indians of Canada at Menis, in the year 1747; [spelled 3Iinas. It was a French village in Nova Scotia — 8— and at one time a town of considerable importance. No traces of it are now to be seen, except the cellars of the houses, a few aged orchards and groups of willows.] that he was under the command of Maj. Noble (acting); that from Menis he was taken to various places by his captors, and after about four years he came to Quebec. That in September, 1752, while at Quebec as a prisoner, ho tried to agree with some Indians to aid him in an escape to his own home in New England, but the In- dians proved treacherous and informed the Governor of the plot, who immedi- ately ordered him to jail where he lay three months, after which time he was released. That the French were then preparing for a march to Belle Riviere, (Ohio) and he offered his services, but the Governor, Gen. LeCain (Duquesne), refused him. That he then applied to Maj. Ramsey for liberty to go to Ohio with the army, and that he was finally accepted and equipped as a soldier, and was at once sent with the detachment of 300 [The Governor reports to his gov- ernment that there were but 250 men.] men to Montreal under the command of Mons. Babeer, and from there they set off immediately by land and ice for Lake Erie, stopping twice for rest, the last time at Toronto, before reaching Niag- ara. That they remained at the fort 15 days, and then set out by water, it being April, and arrived at Chadakoin, on Lake Erie (Barcelona), where they were ordered to fell timber and prepare it for building a fort, according to the Governor's instructions, but Mons. Mora7ig [spelled 3Iariii] coming up the next day with 500 men and 20 Indians, put a stop to the building of the fort, not liking the situation, the river Chad- akoin (Chautauqua Creek) beiag too shallow to carry out any craft with pro- visions, etc., to Belle Riviere [the French called the Alleghany river La Belle Riviere, a continuation of the Ohio.] That the two commanders had a sharp debate, the first insisting on building the fort there in accordance with instructions, but Morang gave him a writing to satisfy the Governor on that point; and then Mons. Mercier, who was commissary and engineer, was directed to go along the lake and look for a situation, which he found, and re- turned in three days, it being fifteen leagues to the southwest of Chadakoin (at Erie). That they were then all ordered to repair thither, and when they arrived thei-e were about 20 Indians fishing in the lake, who immediately quit it on seeing the French. They built a square fort of chestnut logs, squared and lapped over each other to the height of 15 feet. The fort was 120 feet square, and a log house in each square, a gate at the northward and one at the south ward and not a porthole out in any part of it. When finished they called it Fort La Briske \_Presque1 Isle. The Indians who came with them now returned, be- ing dissatisfied with the dogged be- havior of Morang. As soon as the fort was finished they moved southward, cutting a wagon road through a fine level country 21 miles to the river of Boeuf (at Waterford), leaving Capt. Deponteney with a hundred men to garrison Fort la Briske Isle. Then they fell to work cutting timber, boards etc. for another fort. Mons. Morang ordered Mons. Bite with 50 men to go to a place called by the Indians gana- garahara (Franklin), on the banks of Belle river where Aux Boeufs [the French called French Creek, Aux Boeufs (O Buff)], empties into it. Then Morang had 90 boats made to carry down the baggage and provisions to said place. Mons. Bite in coming to said Indian Place (Frank- lin) was asked what he wanted or in- tended, and he answered that it was their father's, the governor of Canada's — 9— intention to build a trading house for their and all their brother's conveni- ence, but the Indians replied that the land was theirs, that they would not have them build on it. The said Mons. Bite returning, met two English traders with their horses and goods, whom they bound and brought to Morang, who ordered them to Canada in irons. Eite reported to Morang that the situ- ation was good, but the water of the river Aux Boeuf was too low at that time to carry down any craft with pro- visions, etc. That Morang became very peevish, sour and sick, and was very unpopular with his officers and men, and that he wished his officers and men would confine him in the fort and set fire to it so as to terminate some of his disappointments, as he had promised the governor of Canada to finish the three forts that season, and not being able to fulfill the same, was both afraid and ashamed to return to Canada, be- ing sensible he had now forfeited the governor's favor, so he desired to per- ish in the flames of the burning fort. The officers would not do this, though they had tot the best regard for him, as he had behaved veiy ill to them all. That about eight days before he left Fort la Briske Isle, Chev. la Crake ar- rived express from Canada in a birch canoe worked by ten men, with orders (as he afterwards learned) from Gover- nor la Cain (Duquesne) to Morang to make all the preparation possible against the spring of the year, to then build two forts at Chadakoin, one of them by Lake Erie (Barcelona), the other at the end of the carrying place at Lake Chadakoin (Chautauqua), which carrying place is fifteen miles from one lake to the other. That Chev. la Crake returned immedi- ately to Canada, after which, when Fort Pdviere O'Boeuf was finished, which was built of wood, stockaded triangularwise, with two log houses on the inside, Mor- ang ordered all the party to return to Canada for the winter season, except 300 men which he kept to garrison both forts and prepare material against the spring for building other forts. Morang sent also Jean Coeur, an officer and in- terpreter, to stay the winter among the Indians of Ohio in order to prevail upon them, if possible, not only to allow of the building of forts on their lands, but also persuade them to join the French interests against the English. Depo- nent further says that on the 28th of October he set out for Canada under command of Capt. Deman, who had the command of twenty-two Buttoes, with twenty men in each Batto, the remain- der, being 7G0 men, followed in a few days. On the 30th they arrived at Chad- akoin (Barcelona), where they stayed four days, during which time Mons. Peon [spelled Pean], with 200 men, cut a wagon road over the carrying place from Lake Erie to Lake Chadakoin, viewed the situation which proved to their liking, so set oflf Nov. 3d for Niag- agara where we arrived on the 6th; it is a poor old rotten fort with 25 men in it. We left 50 men there to build Battoes for the army in the spring. Also built a storehouse for provisions, &c. Stayed there two days then set oflf for Canada by water. That while within one mile from Oswego, all hands being weary with rowing all night, they landed and had breakfast, and at this point he, with a Frenchman, slipped oflf and got to the fort and were there concealed until the army passed, when they left and came here (Col. Johnson's). Deponent fur- ther says that in all, during the season, there came to Presque Isle about 1,500 men — 300 were kept for garrison duty at la Briske Isle and la Boeuf, 50 at Niagara and the balance returned to Canada . his Stephen [X] Coffen. mark Sworn before me this 10th day of Jan- uary, 1754. William Johnson. —10- Lieufc. H. Holland, commanding at Oswego, in a letter to Gov. Delancey of New York, dated Nov. 8, 1753, speaks of these two deserters, the one an Englishman and the other a Frenchman, coming to the fort at the time stated [Col. Hist. N. Y. Vol. 6, page 825.] Six other de- serters from Niagara (Frenchmen,) came to Oswego the fore part of April the following year (1754), two of whom. Antoine Francois L'On- aque and Jean Bapti ste de Cortois, were with the expedition to Lake Erie, Chadakoin etc. [Col. Hist, N. Y. Vol. 6, page 833.1 They were sent to Sir William Johnson, and by him to Albany where they were critically examined by Dr. Alex. Calhoun, and the facts elicited sent to Gov. Delan- cey, April 12, 1754. Their state- ments, and the diagrams of Fort la Briske Isle and la Boeuf they pre- pared were in nearly every particu- lar corroborative of the statements made by Coffen in his affidavit. The English were well apprised in regard to this expedition, through deserters before it left Canada, and of the teal designs of the French. The thiee divisions of their army passed the fort at Oswego in the precise order and on the time proposed by them, the first leaving Quebec January 1, 1753, the second leaving on the first of March, and the third on the first of May following, the last passing Oswego on the 14th of May, as we learn from a letter of Lieut. Holland commanding, to Gov. Clinton dated the next day, May 15th, and of Capt. Stoddart to Col. Johnson, of the same date. The plans of the French were in no sense disturbed until they reached Chadakoin, where after a fierce wordy contest between tne two commanders, M. Barbeer and M. Marin, the route was changed from that point to the present location of Erie, as stated by Coffen and the deserters from Niagara in April fol- lowing. I regret exceedingly that the building of the fort at Chada- koin (Barcelona,) was so suddenly interrupted. A few months since I visited the proposed location, as I imagined, though nothing but the peculiar surface of the ground gave me thfe least idea as to its certain location. But while there I cculd not help conjuring up weird phan- toms from the misty past and cover- ing the whole section with an army of Frenchmen, well drawn out and reaching to the foothills and over the highlands to Chautauqua lake. Many years ago I had the pleasure of visiting the grounds occupied by Forts le Briske Isle and le Boeuf. We have become inter- ested in these forts and I de- sire to speak of them more definitely, in fact this seems to be necessary in order to fully under- stand what is to lollow. Fort la Briske Isle was located on the top of a hill, or high plat of ground on the west side of what is now called Mill Creek, the stream that empties into the bay at Erie, at its eastern end and just east of the now Parade street, one of the popular streets of the city. It was situated in the angle formed by the steep sides of the narrow valley of Mill Creek and the bluff of the lake or bay. It was a commanding posi- tion. Coffen in his affidavit gives us a slight description of it, its dimen- sions etc., and others speak of it as built in the approved French fash- ion, with four bastions, one of which was evidently used for storing arms. The site is being gradually destroyed in the process of brickmaking. Many relics have been found from time to time, such as old swords, pistols, cutlerly, broken crockery and occasionally a coin, and the remains of bodies that had been hurried near by. A few years ago workmen unearthed what they term- ed a bay window of the old fort. It -11— was one of the bastions and had in it a large number of pistols, gun- barrels, hatchets and other tools. Many of these relics are now in mu- seums, and many in the possession of citizens of Erie and other locali- ties, notably in the collection of the late Frank Henry of Wesleyville in that county. [John Miller, Jr., of Erie.] The fort was a work of con- siderable extent and was not com- pleted and ready for occupancy until Aug. 7 of that year, 1753, over three months from the arrival of the French on the ground, not as early as we would infer from the affidavit of Coffen. It wap held by the French until 1759, a period of six years, when the report ot British successes in various directions, especially at Quebec, Sept. 13th decided them to evacuate the two forts between Lake Erie and the Alleghany river. Forts la Briske Isle and le Boeuf, and the Stockade at Venango, and retire from the country. They did not do this, however, but with the hope and expectation of returning within the next two or three years, not doubt - ing but that the English within that time would be driven out of Canada. Four years later, in 1763, the Eng- lish took possession of Fort la Briske Isle, and held it until it was stormed and taken by the Indians during the famous conspiracy of Pontiace, in May of the same year. It surrendered after the hardest two days fight on record. Upon the nearly level ground on the opposite side of the stream from the fort when held by the French, a village had grown up, and it is on record that at one time it contained one hundred families or about 500 inhabitants. It had a mill for grinding grain, and other village etceteras, and a Roman Catholic priest. This record was made in 1758. Late in 1759 there was not a vestige of it left. The cause of this is legendary. One story has it that a plague of small pox wiped out the entire population ; another is that the Indians tomahawked eyery man, woman and child ; still another is to the effect that the people, frightened by the reports of a forward move- ment on the part of the English, and the unfriendly state of affairs be- tween them and the Indians, hastily fled, burying in wells their money and valuables. The latter story is probably the true one, the people leaving with the garrison. Until withm a few years, treasure hunters were busy digging over the ground occupied by the fort and the village, or up to the time the opening of the streets made city squares of it. Almost every square rod from Third street to the bay was at some time turned over. [John Miller, Jr., of Erie.] Now Jet us take a short sur- vey of Fort le Boeuf. Washington's journal of his visit to this fort while in the performance of duties assign- ed him by the goyernor of Virginia, as every student of history will re- call, locates this fort on the south and west fork of French Creek near the water ; that it was nearly sur- rounded by the creek and a small branch of it, forming a kind of island. Its location was just south of the village of Waterford in Erie county, Pa. [It was in fact located on la Boeuf creek as now known.] The road leading to it from Erie, cut out by the French, is still called the French road, and Mr. John Miller Jr. of Erie, to whom I am indebted for valuable information, informs me that it is one of the finest roads in the county Mr. Coffen in his affi- davit says that this fort was triangu- lar in form, but the Pennsylvania Colonial record has it that "four houses composed the sides, the bas- tions were of poles driven into the ground, standing more than twelve feet above and sharpened at the top, with port holes cut for cannon and —12— loop holes for small arms. Eight cannon, six pounders, were mounted in each buation, and one four pound- er before the gate. In the bastions were guard houses, chapel, surgeons' lodgings and commandant's private stores." But it matters little as to the particular form of the fort. Fifty years ago the present season I visited this fort. — The corners of the structure were pointed out to me, and the remains of a fireplace of one of the log houses within the inclosure. But I am of the opinion that these re- mains, and such as I am informed exist there to day, are not the remains of the old French fort. It is well known that this fort was burned and absolutely destroyed by the Indians within a short time of, and probably previous to, the surrender of Fort la Briske Isle to the Indians, or in May, 1759. W. G. Sargeant, Esq., of Mer- cer county. Pa., writes me that his great-grandfather, Andrew Ellicott, m connection with Dr. T. R. Kenne- dy, wHo afterward built mills at Ken- nedy in this county, built a block house on the site of the old French fort, or Fort la Boeuf, in 1791 or '95, which, I understand, was for the pro- tection of their own men while en- gaged in a lumbering enterprise. The remains found there to-day are probably, as Mr. Sargeant seems to suggest, those of this block house built by his ancestor. There are very many facts connected with this old French fort and the French occupan- cy, in my own possession, that are ex- tremely interesting, and I am prom- ised many others by way of Mr. Sar- geant, also with reference to the block house named, that may form subjects for some future paper. In this instance, as in many instances noted in our American antiquities, I believe we have been groping too far in the past, when, on careful inquiry, we might find our originals much nearer our own time. It is said that the diary of a Cath- olic priest, who accompanied the ex- pedition under M. Marin and was lo- cated and officiated at Fort la Boeuf in 1753 and 1754, is still in existence. If so, it doubtless contains informa- tion of interest and value. Since writing the above sentence I have been fortunate in obtaining an Eng- lish copy of this diary, from the original which is now in the archives of the Dominion government, Cana- da, but with a single exception, named farther on, will reserve it as a text for further work at some time in the future. The importance attached by the English to the building of these forts, la Briske Isle and la Boeuf, may be seen in the facts connected with the visit of Maj. Washington to the com- mandant, M. de Pierre, m December, 1753. Washington expected to find the commandant at Fort le Briske Isle (Erie), but he had been called to Fort le Boeuf (Water - ford) to give directions with ref- erence to the strengthening of the fort and the building of boats for the contemplated move- ment in the spring. Washington was greatly surprised at the extens- ive preparations made and making, and the number of transports along the creek — fifty bark canoes, and 170 pine boats ready for use. The his- tory of that visit, as I have said, is well known, and its significance in this connection is seen only in the fact that in the main it corroborates the statements made by Mr. Coffen and the two other deserters rei rred to, and goes to further establish the truth of the whole relation. As fur- ther evidence of the reliability of the statements made by Stephen Caffeu, I desire to introduce the following : The past winter there died in Painesviile, Ohio, Mr. Isaac Shat- tuck, aged 81 years. Mr. Shattuck -13- was for many years a citizen of Port- land in this county, and a man of most perfect integrity. He was a neighbor of mine, and 1 often list- ened with a large degree of pleasure to the recital of facts and incidents by him, of early life as communicated to him by his grandfather. Samuel Shattuck, who came to Portland with the family in 1823, and died in 1827. It is important that I state some facts in regard to this man, Samuel Shat- tuck,as I had them from the grandson and the family, in order to a more perfect understanding of what is to follow. Samuel Shattuck was born in the town of Deerfield, Franklin Co., Mass., Sept. 18, 1741. He was of English origin, his ancestors coming to Massachusetts Bay sometime in the early days of the colony. He came of a hardy and adventurous stock, and was never at ease, even when a small boy, when stirring events were transpiring around him. He was a youth of perfect integrity, unusual good sense and the soul of honor. He grew up amid all the ex citing scenes that cluster around the life of a pioneer and a soldier He remained at his home with his father and his family until his twelfth year. The exciting events of the running strife that existed betv/een the colon ies and Canada before the formal declaration of war, commonly called the French and Indian war, fired his youthful spirit, and no amount of restraint could keep him at home with the family. He was not at all certain what he could do, but was certain that there would be an open- ing somewhere that would admit him to a participation in the strife that was brewing and sure to come, in fact had already come. Sometime in 1752 he left his home in Deerfield in company with some colonial offi - cers, ostensibly for some point north of Albany, New York, but we next hear of him at Oswego on Lake On- tario, quartered at the old fort on the west side of the river, built in 1727. The position he occupied is not known, but it is presumed that he was attached in some way to the officers' quarters. From here com- menced with him a series of adven- tures and duties performed as a soldier, that did not in fact cease until the last farewell was said at the disbanding of the colonial armies in 1783. I have thus intro- duced a slight biographical sketch of the youthful Shattuck for the purpose of placing him in evidence with refrence to certain features of the history of the old Portage Road. The young man remained at Oswego discharging such duties as were assigned him until the next spring, or spring of 1753. His recital of some of the scenes and events of that year and a pait of the next, I will repeat in substance, using my own words. He says : It was well known by Lieut. Holland, the commaudant at the Fort, and all the garrison, that an expedition had been fit- ting out through the fall and early win- ter of 1753-54, at Quebec and Montreal, and it was well known also that its des- tination was the western frontier, in fact some scouts had come in and re- ported that a large number of boats were in process of construction and nearly completed at Niagara for some service, presumably on Lake Erie. In all this we were not disappointed, for in some of the last days of March we were in- formed that an army of from 800 to 1,000 men, French and Indians, had ar- rived at Niagara from Quebec. A day or two later an Iusical powers and he wished to die, and that the work at LeBueuf perish with him. He liug-red along under the most distressing circumstances until the 29th of October, but a siu- gle day after the army left for Canada, when he died. In an En- glish copy of the journal of the catholic priest, officiating at Le Boeuf and Fort Duquesne for the vears 1753 and 1754, which has " • T recently come inio my possession, 1 find the following: •'BURIAIj op MARIN, OOMMANDEK IN CHIEF OF THE AKMY AT LA BELIiE RIVIEBE. " "la the year one thousand seven hun- dred and fifty three, on the twenty- ninth of October, dierl at about half- past four in the evening in the fort of LaReviere aux Boeuf, uoder the name of St. Pierre, Monsieur Pier.e,)0ut, Esq., Sieur deMarin, Chevalier of the Mili- tary and Royal Order of St, Louis, Captain of Infantry and Commander in Chief of the army at LaBelle Riviere.af ter having received the sacraineuts of Pen- ance, Extreme Unction and Viaticum, aged sixty three years. His body was buned in the cametery of said Fort, and that by us Recollet Priest, Chaplain at the said Fort, and during the campaign of LaBelle Reviere. There were pre- sent at his funeral, Monsieurs de Re- pentigny, commandant of the aforesaid army and Captain of lufantiy, and M. M. Du Huys, Lieutenant of Infantry, Benoit, Lieutenant of Infantry, De Simblin, Major at the aforesaid Fort, Lat'ors, keeper of the stores, who have sieued with us. Le Gardetjr de Repentignx. Laforce Benois de Hdxs, T. DE PRE Simblin, Fb Denys, Bakom Ptke Recollet. Chaplain. Sieur Marin was a remarkable man. He was chosen to command this expedition on acconnt of his great ability and peculiar tact in dealing with the Indian tribes, as we learn from a letter of Governor Duquesne to his home government, before the expedition lelt Canada. [Paris Doc. X. Aug. 20, 1753.J But he was rash and unprincipled, with an overweening ambition to serve well his King and country and build up an empire in the heart of the North American continent and do it in his own way. By his dogged per- sistence he possibly and probably defeated what might have been a grand success; for who can tell what would have been the result if the ex- pedition had reached its destination the same season, as it might and probably would have done had not the route been changed. But what- ever he was or was not he is deserv- ing of great credit for his p rsever- ance under such uutovard and dis- couragmg circnmstances. Thus end- ed the first expedition to establisaa line of French forts between Can- ada and the Valley of the Mississippi and the Gulf of Mexico : and really the master spirit of the enterprise gave his life for its success and sealed his work by leaving his earthly re- mains in the soil on which the most herculean efforts of his life had been made. I have thus briefly adverted to a few facjs and incidents connected with the eaily occupancy of the —23- western and southern section of our county, and their study has been of gi'owing interest to me; yet a thous- and things renaain to be said, but ujust be passed over for the present. Although much of the evidence with reference to the four propositions named in the outset is in a sense traditional in character, yet it seems to me that it is of such a character that the most skeptical can hardly fail of acknowledging its truth. That the deep solitudes of our coun- ty were the scenes of warlike dem- onstrations nearly half a century be- fore the first settlement by the whites (1802) now admits of no doubt, and that the old Portage Road from its associations has claims on us as a relic of the past, none will deny; and I believe our discussion has demonstrated with reference to the four propositions stated in the outfcet: 1st, that the old Portage Road was constructed by an army of Frenchmen coming from Quebec, Canada, by way of Niagara. 2d, that it was constructed in 1753. 3d, that it was constructed for the transportation of military stores and munitions of war. 4tb, that it was actually used for the purposes in- tended within a few months after its construction and by those by whom it was constructed. It would have been interesting and perhaps more profitable had I, before writing this puper, presented more or less minutely a hi-tory of the adventures of some of the early French travelers to this section, such as Baron la Hon tan, who was an officer in the expedition of Gov. Denonville to Lake Ontario and Niagara in 1687. After leaving Niagara laHoutau coasted along the northern shore of Lake Eiie as far as the French Post of St. Joseph. With some western Indians he afterward passed to the south shore, but I do tiot find, as I once supposed, that he came within the limits of Chautauqua County, but having visited the counties both east and west of this county, he became so well informed with reference to the country, pro- ductions, etc., that he gave a very fine description of buth, the next year, 1688. He was very enthusiastic in regard to the section near the lower end of the lake and refers with a good deal of animation to the wild beeves (bufifalos) found in "prodigious quantities" roaming in the forest. And that other French traveler, Charlevoix, who visited our county in 1720, who gave a glowing description of the scenery along our northern border, and the bright green hills in the background. But these and a thousand facts and in- cidents that I might have named must be left for the present for want of time and space. I may return to them at some time in the future. As I am an advocate today for Chautauqua county and its claims to such honors as may come froua mili- tary occupancy or military move- ments within her borders, I wish to refer to another thing that re- lates to ancient warlike demonstra- tions. Judge Foote refers to it in his letter of Feb., 1871, and Mr. Edson in his addenda to that letter also refers to it. I have reference to to the statement that a British ex| e- dition during the revolutionary war, 01 in 1782, was fitted out at some point, and destined to operate against Fort Pitt, then in the possession of the colonial forces, and for two months or more rendezvoused on Chautauqua lake preparatory to a descent on that point. I remember very well of reading at the time the lecture of Hon, ISamuel A. Brown, of Jamestown, before the students of Jamestown Academy, I think in 1843, in wbicn he stated that an army of 3u0 British and 500 Indian?, with twelve pieces of artillery, spent two months, June and July, around Chautauqua lake pieparatory to floating down the outlet and the Alle- 24- glviny to attack Fort Pitt. I am not apprised in regard to his authori- ty for the statement, but presume it ■was the same letter of Gen. Irvine to Gen. Washington, from which I have already quoted. This story has been discredited by some, and Judge Foote did not give it full credence, yet it might have been true and probably was true. It would seem that sixty-one years, or to 1843, ought not to have obliterated every vestige of so important a movement as this one. In older countries it is probable some record would have been j reserved, but with us in the new world, as we call it, the word is onward, with but too little reference to the past or its lessons. I will quote again from the letter of Gen. Irviue : "He," the Seneca Indian giving information to General Irvine, whose name was Kio?ola, "was constantly employed by the British during the late war and held the rank of cap- tain, and commanded the party which was defeated on the Alle- ghany by Col. Broadhead ; that a detachment c mposed of 300 British and 500 Indians was formed and actually embarked in canoes on Lake Jadague, with twelve pieces of artil lery with an avowed intention of at- tacking Fort Pitt. This expedition was laid aside in consequence of the reported repairs and strength of Fort Pitt, carried by a spy from the neighborhood of the Fort. They then contented themselves with the usual mode of warfare, by seuding small parties, on the frontier, one of which burned Hannaslown. * * * I remember very well that in August 178..', we picked up at Fort Put a number of canoes which had drifted down the river.aud I received repeated accounts in June and July from a Cauadian who deserted to me, as well as from some friendly Indians, of this armament, but I never knew before then where they had assem- bled." This is all that has come to us from any source of a historic nature touching this matter. I have hereto- fore introduced tradition to aid me in my endeavor to learn facts, and I shall hope to re pardoned if I again introduce myself as a medium through which other like evidence mav be introduced that mav be of interest and may cast a gleam of light on an otherwise obscure page of his- tory. Fifty-one vears ago the pres ent fall (1890), or 'fall of 1839, 1 was in the city of Pittsburg on business and on my return to my home in Meadville, Pa., I proposed to find my way over the river road on foot. The second day I fell in company with an Alleghany liver pilot from some point above Franklin. Hts name has entirely escaped me. He Was a man ot fine physique, and in some Sense one of the most remark- able men I ever met. at least as far as general information was concerned. No subject could be broached but an ULUsually intelligent discussion on his part followed as a matter of course. During our long walk I learned much of his history and that of his family. He was then, he said, fortv-nine years of age. His father was born in what is now Chester county, Pa , and was a soldier of the Revolution. He was v/ith Col. Dan- niel Broadhead in 1779 on his expe- dition against the Seneca and Mun- sey Indians in August and Septem- ber of that year, but was seriously wounded at some point on the upper Alleghany, by an accidental dis- charge ot his gun, and left to die, but for some cause he never learned he was carried a long distance away by some Indians, secreted and nursed to health and protected for some months, or until strength returned, when he was allowed to depart, and in due time found his way to his old home. He very soon enlisted again and was most of the time on the frontier in some capacity, was cap- tured by the Indians in the spring —25— of 1782, and was as a prisoner, with a party of 300 English and some four or five hundred Indians on Chautauqua lake in the summer of that year. He said they were pre- paring to drop down the Alleghany to Fort Pitt ; that the expedition started at the appointed time, but for some cause not apparent to him stopped short of its destination. From this camp they sent out three parties in as many different direc- tions within a very short time, one of which pillaged and burned Han- nastown (a small village in what is now Northumberland county, Pa.) His father esc iped from the main camp after the return of the party from Hannastown and found his way to Fort Pitt, and eventually to his home. He did not again enlist. This is given for what it is worth, but I am convinced of its truth. It is almost identical with the story of the Seneca Indian and goes far to corroberate it and some facts in his- tory. In looking over the whole matter in the light of such evidence as I have been able to obtain, I have DO doubt but this expedition was actually undertaken, the British coming from Canada by way of Fort Niagara and Lake Erie to the now lo- cation of the village of Barcelona, the same route pursued by the French in 1753, over the old Port- age Koad and Lake Chautauqua, down the outlet and the Alleghany river as stated. H. O. Tatlor. THE END. MB -6 6H A^^ ^■' ^^. ,-^f: :%.^ •»: ^-Z -r ?. %.^ <^ •' . . s* .G -» A. ■a? ■'<^ ^^ c ^- -^c ^!-- /-% -^^m^ /°-o ■■->^.-- .^"'"% •^^^/ /^ N o 4 o. 1 • ■:? ^-^'■v 7^ - ^o V^ V •.^^•" /\. "•%^--" /% '■ 1^ °o c o " " * ■* a « il [' -f :% /^'^ ''v •^ ^i c^^. 0' •'-'•* o. ■^ FLA ^'"iJseoB* »ir^. .s^ '^ ^"'Vi