" o o > .0^ ,0 ^' <* • %'V^^\F,* ^v ">j^ %.o^ .». "-LA, 1, c -^ V v^ > .^■^ .^^ "^^ .>^%. c'^^r. ^°-^.. >^ ^nC,'' A q. > <:^Fm,^S ' ^0 . 3^ SKETCH ED\A^ARD AUGUSTUS, DUKE OK KENT, BY GENERAL MARCUS J. WRIGHT. [Originally published in "Ware's Valley Monthly," St. Louis, Mo., in 1876.] RICHMOND, VA.: WM. ELLIS JONES, STEAM BOOK AND JOB PRINTER. 1889. ■AloV^7 NOTK. On a recent visit to England I formed many pleasant acquaintances and friendships, and had some enquiries for copies of a little sketch of Edward Augustus, Duke of Kent, which I had written thirteen years ago. It was originally published in " Ware's Valley Monthly," of St. Louis, Mo., and I had a few copies printed in pamphlet form. This pamphlet edition being exhausted, I have had a second (limited) edition printed, which is without change from the original publication. I have, however, added letters from Major-General Sir Henry F. Ponsonby, Private Secretary to the Queen ; Sir Edward Thornton, late British Min- ister to the United States, and Captain Vernor Chater, A. D. C. to the Marquis of Lome, late Governor-General of Canada. I dedicate this sketch to my friend, The Reverend FREDERICK K. HARFORD, Minor Canon of Westminster Abbey, to whom I am greatly indebted for much of the pleasure I had on my first visit to England. MARCUS J. WRIGHT. Washington, D. C, U. S. A., October, i88g. SKETCH. There is no public character living, outside of our own country, in whom the people of the United States feel a greater interest than in Victoria, Queen of Great Britain and Ireland. Nor is this at all singular. On the contrary, considering the former connection of the Colonies with the British Crown ; that much the larger number of our native citizens are the descendants of parents from the British Isles ; that our language, literature, and religion are similar, it is very natural that such should be the case. But when, added to this, we have the authority of one of England's greatest writers for the remark that " in Queen Victoria her subjects have found a wiser, gentler, happier Elizabeth," and that in her, her subjects have also found a monarch who has been guided by the belief that the powers of royalty are held in trust for the people, and are not the end, but the mere means, of gov- ernment; that she is, and has been during her entire reign, the most constitutional monarch her country has ever seen ; that she has prac- ticed during her government every domestic virtue, and that her life has been a stainless one, setting an example of piety which has had its influence for good throughout the whole of the magnificent empire over which she reigns, we need go no farther to ascertain the reason for this interest. It may, therefore, be presumed that a short sketch of the Duke of Kent, the father of the Queen, taken mostly from Mr. Neale's Memoir (a work which attained but one small edition, and which is accessible to only a few readers), would not be uninteresting to the readers of the Valley Monthly. Edward Augustus, Duke of Kent, the fourth son of George III, THE D UKE OF KENT. was born at Buckingham House on November 2, 1767. He was placed at an early age under the care of Mr. Fisher, who was after- wards made Canon of Windsor and Bishop of Exeter and Salisbury. At Kew Palace, during the Duke's childhood, he broke a time-piece highly prized by George III, it having formerly belonged to the Duke of Gloucester, son of Queen Anne. When questioned on the subject, he frankly admitted having broken it, and could not be persuaded to confess penitence for the deed. He was severely punished, and we are led to infer, from his biographer's account of it, that the punish- ment was of a character very unusual for children of the blood royal. In his eighteenth year the Duke was sent to Lunenburg, then a part of the electorate of Hanover, and placed under charge of Baron Wangenheim, for the purpose of prosecuting military studies. The King had granted him an allowance of a thousand pounds, but the money was placed in the hands of the Baron, who was noted for his miserly propensities. The result was that, between fines imposed for military misdemeanors and moneys expended by the Baron himself for "contingencies," the Duke found his allowance very short. Be- sides the appropriation of his money by the Baron, he was placed under the most rigid military discipline, so that he was very glad, at the end of a year, to be removed to Hanover and to occupy apart- ments in one of the royal palaces. Notwithstanding the delight which he felt at the change, he soon felt the verity of the saying of Horace, "■Ceolum non animuni mutant, qui trans mare currunt,'^ for he found here no abatement of military rigor, no increase of allowance, and, added to these, his letters to the King were destroyed and never reached their destination; false representations of his conduct reached the royal ear, and he found his actions under the closest system of espionage. The gloom of this life was lighted in May, 1786, by receipt of the intelligence that he had been appointed a Colonel in the army by brevet, and in June following he was elected a Knight of The d uke of rent. the Garter. In the succeeding October, by command of the King, he went into quarters at Geneva. Here he was, for the first time in his life, thrown into the company of several English noblemen and gen- tlemen of his own age. The allowance now paid to Baron Wangen- heim for the support of the Duke was six thousand pounds per annum, but he neither relaxed his military rigor, his system of espionage, nor did he greatly increase the amount of money which reached the Prince. The result of this course was, that the Prince made debts which proved a burden and serious annoyance to him during the remainder of his life. His biographer, remarking on this, says : " The inade- quacy of his income for many years to support him in the style of living which, as a Prince, he was called upon to adopt, was a perpetual and unmerited source of discomfort and disquiet." Finding all ap- peals to or remonstrances with the old Baron futile, he determined to go to his father, tell his wrongs, and ask for that treatment which was due to a Prince and the son of a King. Acting on this impulse, and keeping his intentions secret, he set out, and arrived in London in January, 1 790, and took up quarters at a hotel in King street, St. James' Square. His eldest brother, the Prince of Wales, being noti- fied of his arrival, called and conducted him to Carlton House, his home. The Duke of York is sent for next day, and after consultation it is determined that he shall convey to the King the intelligence of the arrival of Edward. The Duke of York returns with information that the royal father received the intelligence of the arrival of the Prince with the greatest demonstrations of displeasure and rage — " Edward has violated military law ; he has quitted his post without leave ; he is now in England without my cognizance or consent. His presence here is an act of the most daring disobedience, and I will do nothing to sanction it." For thirteen days the unhappy Prince sought an interview with the King without avail. At the end of that time he received by a messenger from the royal hand a sealed envelope, which THE DUKE OF KENT. he opened hastily and found it to be an order from the King to em- bark for Gibraltar within twenty-four hours. Before leaving, he was allowed an audience with the King of five minutes, and dismissed with an insignificant sum of money to defray his expenses. On July ist he left England, unsoothed by a single word of affection, confidence, or cheer from his father. Whilst his new position increased his expenses and his income was not augmented, he was at least relieved of the tyranny of Baron Wangenheim. General O'Hara, the commandant at Gibraltar, placed him in charge of Colonel Symes, in whom he found not only an agreeable instructor, but a friend, who used every means at his command to ameliorate his condition. The Duke's education under Baron Wangenheim had impressed him with the importance of strict military discipline, and the enforce- ment of his views in this respect, as commanding officer of the Royal Fusileers, rendered him unpopular with the men. Representations of this feeling of dissatisfaction having been transmitted home, the Duke was ordered to embark for America with his regiment. Before leav- ing, however, he made arrangements for the settlement of his debts, which had now increased to twenty thousand pounds, by which he gave bonds to his creditors bearing interest and payable at the expira- tion of seven years. On his arrival at Quebec he learned that his allowance had been reduced from six to five thousand pounds per annum, and that it was impossible for him to maintain his character as a field-officer and a Prince on this allowance. He therefore asked and obtained from Sir Charles Grey, who was commanding the forces engaged against the French in West Indies, an appointment on the staff, and he was reported by Sir Charles, in his dispatches to the Government from the Island of Martinique, as "commanding at Camp La Coste with great spirit and activity." He afterwards distinguished himself in several engagements, and acquired great popularity with the men and officers of that army. In April, 1794, he led the first THE DUKE OF KENT. division, consisting of the First and Second Battalions of Grenadiers and the naval battalion, at the capture of Gaudaloupe, attacking with great spirit, bravery, and activity the post on Morne Marcot, and was complimented in official dispatches for his conduct by Sir Charles Grey. At the time we now write of the Duke was twenty-seven years old. Intelligence, through official sources, having reached Parliament of his meritorious conduct in the field, both houses passed a vote of thanks to him for " his gallant conduct and meritorious exertions." The Irish Parliament passed a similar resolution, and the young Duke was suddenly covered with legislative votes, approbation, and compli- ment. But the Duke felt that honor could not replenish his finances. He needed money; and notwithstanding the extravagant sums voted to his elder brother, the Prince of Wales, not a pound was granted to him. This was the more singular, as his brother, the Duke of York, had received his parliamentary provision on the arrival of his twenty- first birthday, and the Duke of Clarence at twenty-four had a grant of sixteen thousand pounds, in addition to a previously-granted income, although neither of them had, in a public capacity, " rendered the State service." It was believed by many of the Duke's friends that he was never a favorite at Court, and that the King's aversion to him arose from his known liberal public opinions. At the conclusion of the West India campaign, the Duke was ordered back to Canada. A fall from a horse in the autumn of 1798 caused his return to England for surgical treatment. In the early part of the succeeding year his first annual allowance of twelve thou- sand pounds was granted him by Parliament. The King, however, had a proviso Inserted in the bill which allowed the Duke of Cumber- land, who was four years younger, to receive an allowance of the same amount, commencing^ at the same time, which, according- to all former usage, entitled Duke Edward to forty-eight thousand pounds 10 THE D UKE OF KENT. for back allowance to place him on an equal footing with Cumberland ; but it was never allowed him. In 1 799 he was raised to the dignity of Duke of Kent and Strathearne, in Great Britain, and Earl of Dublin, in Ireland, and in the following May he took his seat in the House of Lords. He was soon afterwards promoted to the rank of General in the army, and on May 17th was assigned the direction, as commander-in-chief, of the forces in British North America, He at once embarked for his new field, but his stay there was brief, by reason of a severe bilious attack, which made it necessary for him to return to England. Availing himself of his stay in England, after recovering from his illness, he applied in person to Mr. Pitt, the Prime Minister, for jus- tice in the matter of his allowance. Mr. Pitt gave what seemed to be plausible reason for the past delay, and promised that the fullest jus- tice should be done him ; but the promise was never redeemed. Mr. Addington, who succeeded Mr Pitt, did not carry out the promises of his predecessor, but appointed the Duke Governor of Gibraltar, a position at that time, considering the bad condition of the garrison, not much to be envied even by an officer who was neither a Prince nor a General. He found drunkenness and consequent disorder, disobe- dience, and want of discipline the rule at the garrison with both offi- cers and men. He saw that nothing but firm, decided, and harsh measures would cure the evil. He used the means, restored order, and was at once relieved of his command and ordered home. Ar- riving in London, he asked for a Court of Inquiry, which was refused him. He then asked for a court-martial, waiving his rank. This, too, was denied. He pleaded for any sort of investigation, and all these being refused, he expressed a desire to return to his post, which was also refused, without the assignment of any reason. For several years the Duke led a quiet and retired life. To meet the demands of his creditors he settled one half of his income (which THE DUKE OF KENT. 11 he afterwards increased to three-fourths) on trustees, for their benefit, and reduced his estabHshment so as to Hve within his means. He quitted England in 1816 and took up his residence at Brussels. From here he made frequent visits into Germany for the purpose of visiting members of his family. During one of these visits he met and made the acquaintance of the Princess of Leinengen, a young, handsome, and amiable widow, who was sister to Prince Leopold, of Saxe-Coburg. At the age of sixteen she had married the hereditary Prince Leinen- gen, a man very much older than herself, and who, according to con- temporaneous report, was totally unsuited to her, not only in age, but in manners, habits, and disposition. The union continued for twelve years, and resulted in the birth of two children, a son and a daughter. It is said of the Princess that, notwithstanding the incompatibility of herself and husband, her conduct during the marriage and up to the time of the death of the Prince, was characterized, on her part, by the most exemplary conduct and discharge of her domestic duties. Her fine person, character, and disposition won the Duke, and they were married at Coburg on May 20, 18 18. For reasons solely controlled by his financial condition, the Duke resided for some time on the con- tinent. But in the next year, the Duchess being enciente, and it being desirable that the infant should be born in England, the Duke was at his wit's ends to raise the necessary means for the trip, and, in fact, the Duchess was far advanced before they could start on their journey. The money was at last provided, neither by the King nor Parliament, but by a few untitled private friends of the Duke. They at last reached England, and on May 24, 18 19, a Princess was born to them at Kensington Palace, who is known to the world as Queen Victoria. On January 28, 1820, the Duke died at Walbrooke Cottage from in- flammation of the lungs. Judging from his acts and the opinions of those who best knew him, we pronounce him to have been a man of ability, firmness, and Christian principles ; a man of liberal opinions 12 THE DUKE OF KENT. and broad charity, who met the unmerited displeasure and harsh treat- ment of his father and family with a spirit of forbearance and patience ; and it can but be a source of regret that, amid all his trials and suf- ferings, he should have been permitted to pass from the world unblessed by the knowledge that the little Princess, his first-born, and whom he loved with such tenderness and devotion, should succeed to the throne of his father, and should win for her glorious reign the universal plaudits of the civilized world. Columbia, Tenn, [Note.— It adds additional lustre to the character of the Queen that soon after her accession to the throne she promptly discharged all of her father's debts.] WINDSOR CASTLE, December 6, 1879. Sir — I am commanded by the Queen to convey to you Her Majesty's thanks for your kindness in presenting to the Queen the copy of your " Sketch of Edward Augustus, Duke of Kent." I have the honor to be, sir. Your obedient servant, HENRY F. PONSONBY. To General Marcus J. Wright. BRITISH LEGATION, Washington, November 21, 1879. Dear Sir — I am much obliged to you for your kindness in sending me a copy of your work on the Duke of Kent, which I accept with pleasure. I am sorry that I could not comply with your wish to forward the copy intended for the Queen, but I am sure that you will have understood why I could not do so. I remain, dear sir, Truly yours, EDWARD THORNTON. To General Marcus J. Wright. FISHING CAMP OF THE GOVERNOR GENERAL, Grand Cascapedia River, Canada, July ioth, 1880. Sir — I have been desired by Her Royal Highness, the Princess Louise, to return to you Her Royal Highness' best thanks for the "Sketch of Edward Augustus, Duke of Kent," which the Princess accepts with very much pleasure. I remain, sir, Yours faithfully, VERNOR CHATER, Captain, A. D. C. To General Marcus J. Wright, Wa7' Department, Washington^ U. S. H 155 79 ^ f <^°^ o V * <^^/^-\/ %'^^-/ ^^,*^-\/ %'*^*/ V*^-'./ 5 _ c *o ^■^ ^^, 'b V' -^^o^ A° APR "^9 N. MANCHESTER, INDIANA 46962 ^'V' , o " ■> - 'S' ^^ ^°-^<^, . '\',>v<»r=ki» . -^^.^ •^2..^