1-^- HISTORY iSi MASSACHVSETTS 11 ■ I With the compliments of BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS HISTORY OF THE Town of Princeton IN THE COUNTY OF WORCESTER AND COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS 1759-1915 By FRANCIS EVERETT BLAKE VOLUME I NARRATIVE PRINCETON PUBLISHED BY THE TOWN I915 VC\ March 4, 191 2. — Art. 20. Voted to accept the Act of the present Legislature authorizing the town to use the funds obtained from the sale of the Meeting House Hill Land for the preparation of History of the Town, and if there is any remainder it shall be devoted to the Town Library. Committee appointed, J. D. Gregory, M. C. Goodnow, J. C. F. Mirick, Rev. C. E. Reeves. " I have gon, and rid, and wrote, and sought and search'd with my own and friends' Eyes, to make what Discoveries I could therein. * * * I stand ready with a pence! in one hand and a Spunge in the other, to add, alter, insert, expunge, enlarge, and delete, according to better information. And if these my pains shall be found worthy to passe a second Impression, my faults I will confess with shame, and amend with Ihankfulnesse, to such as will contribute clearer Intelligence unto me." Fuller s " Worthies of England," 1662. p/^r 2'^ *k:'r Paper manufactured by the George W. Wheelwright Paper Company. PREFACE In planning the publication of some historical sketches of the town of Princeton twenty-five years ago, it was found that, unfortunately, the town papers had shared the fate of those of many other towns, a large proportion hav^- ing been lost in the past. There are no papers preserved of any kind bearing an earlier date than 1766. Of that date there is but one, and only twenty of a date earlier than 1770. The loss of these papers, and of the records of a few of the earliest town meetings, deprives us of much valuable information. As sources of information regarding the first settlement had evidently not been ex- hausted by the historians of the town a search was begun for items especially relating to the incorporation of the district and town, and for the names of the first residents, with the date of their settlement. The many references also to the "Farms" adjoining the East Wing of Rutland led to an investigation into their history and the origin of their titles. These items have been gathered only after diligent search in the Archives of the State, the Journals of the General Court, the Worcester Registry of Deeds and of Probate, the Records of the County Courts, newspapers of the eighteenth century, and various other storehouses of his- torical treasures. Although a few of the papers relating to the incorpora- tion of the district have been elsewhere published, it is deemed best to print all of the papers together, making a continuous narrative comprising all that can be obtained from public records. Two histories of the town have been published, one by Charles Theodore Russell (1838), and one by Rev. J. L. Hanaford (1852), which, however, are largely taken up with an account of the ecclesiastical dissensions arising iv Preface from the relation established by law between town and church. The lapse of time, however, since the publication of these histories and the larger scope of the present vol- ume may fully justify its publication. The preparation of this history, long delayed on account of the illness of the author, is due to his affectionate in- terest in his native town. This interest he has already exhibited by preparing for the New England Historic Genealogical Society a copy of the first Record Book of births, marriages and deaths in the town, and by repair- ing, arranging and classifying the town papers for the past one hundred years, making six large volumes which are now in the Goodnow Library, and also by preparing a Subject Index for the first book of Town Records, The author's acknowledgements are due to his friend, Mr. Franklin P. Rice, for invaluable aid In arranging material for the press, and also to his friend, Mr. William A. Emerson, for similar aid in collecting and arranging matter for the genealogical record, thus enabling him to carry out his original intention of presenting the genealogy of every family of both past and present residents. With- out the aid of these gentlemen it would have been impos- sible to bring this work to completion. It gives him pleasure to express his appreciation of all that has been done for him by various persons in the way of help and encouragement in this enterprise, and he also admits his indebtedness to the curators of public records, whose uni- form courtesy has been extremely helpful. It is hoped that, while the older people may find much of interest in the perusal of these volumes, the younger people also may take pleasure in becoming acquainted with the early history of their town, and with the men who have been prominent in its affairs. Boston, Mass., June 15, 1915. CONTENTS Page Preface iii Contents v List of Illustrations ix CHAPTER I The Town in 1915. Situation and area. Surface. Wachusett Mountain. Ponds and Streams. Climate. Soil. Land and Agricultural Products. Natural Productions. Wild Animals. Population. Health. Manufactures. Other Occupations. Re- ligious Organizations. Schools. Public Library. Newspaper. Telephone. Electric Lights. Communication. Geology. Name. Town Appropriations 1914. Table of Aggregates. Town Assets. 1-7 CHAPTER II The Early Period. District of Prince Town. The first settlement. Nipnet or Nipmug County. Indians. Exploration. A new way. Land Purchases. Nipmuck Territory. Purchasers. Indian Deed. Delay in Occupation. Queen Anne's War. Return of the settlers. Title Worthless. Name of Rutland. Name of Associates. The New Township. Proprietors. First Birth. Sales and Transfers. East Wing. Father Ralle's War. Massacre in Rutland. Renewal of Settlement. New Survey. Gift to Rev. Mr. Prince. Pro- prietors' Records. French War 8-33 CHAPTER III The Farms Adjoining. Province Grants. Watertown Farms. Gard- ner's Farms. Edward Wilson. John Frost. Benjamin Hough- ton. Blagrove's Farm. Muzzy's Farm. Potash Farm. May- hew's Farm. Allen's Farms. Willard's Farm. Kneeland's Farm. Stevens' Farm. Johnson's or Hartwell's Farm. Joshua Wilder's Farm 34-73 CHAPTER IV Early Inhabitants. The Early Settlers. Identity. Dates of Occu- pation. First Settlers. Doctor Harvey. A Protest. List of Settlers, 1761-1771. Census of 1790, valuation list U. S. Direct Tax, 1798 74-91 V vi Contents CHAPTER V Incorporation. The District and Town. Petition of "The Farms" ^^^^ Protest. Rejoinder. Report. The Town. Boundaries No Town. Change of line between Westminster and Princeton 92-108 CHAPTER VI The Reverend Thomas Prince. Town Name. Birth. The Old South Church. Ordination. Salary. Residences in Boston. Plan for the Day. Quality as a Minister. One Notable Incident. Liter- ary Ability. Publications. Earthquakes and Lightning Rods. Psalms. Rutland Lands. Gift for Services. Death. Preamble to Will. Prince Library. Life's Work 1 09-1 21 CHAPTER VII Ecclesiastical History. First Difficulties, Meetings at Private Houses. Mr. Harrington's Sermon. The First Meeting House. Location. The Raising. Description. Dignifying the Pew Ground. Protest. First Stove. Choir. Town Meetings. Horse Sheds. Church Organization. The Covenant, Princetown. Can- didates for Preaching. Rev. Timothy Fuller. Ordination. New Covenant. Gifts. Bible. Political Differences. Mr. Fuller's Reply. Action of The Town. Suit against the Town. Supplies. Ineffectual Efforts. Stocks. Rev. Thomas Crafts. Rev. Joseph Russell. New Meeting House. The Raising. Decoration. Stove. New Meeting House Committee's Report. Rev. James Murdock. Rev. Samuel Clarke. Presbyterian Church. Rev. John P. Cowles. Union Congregational Church. First Parish. Rev. Elijah De- mond. Third Edifice. Succeeding ministers to 1915. The Baptists. The Baptist Church. Methodist Church. The Universalists. . . . 122-178 CHAPTER VIII Town Government. First Town Meeting. Lost Records. A Pro- test. Subsequent Town Meetings. Protest. List of Selectmen, 1760 to 1915. Town Clerks. Treasurers. Representatives. As- sessors. Moderators. Constables 179-199 CHAPTER IX Education. Requirement. First Schoolmaster. School Districts. Families of Early Settlers by Districts. Schools in Private Houses. Centre District. School Houses. Stoves. Centre District Di- vided. Care of the Schools. Instructions to School Committees. Expenses. Distinguishing Terms. Teachers. Boarding of Teachers. English and Classical Schools. High School. School Superintendents. School Committee 200-217 Contents vii CHAPTER X Page Military History. French and Indian War. Revolutionary War. Minute Men. Training Band. Records of the Military Company in Princeton. Capt. Boaz Moore's Company. List of " Lexington Alarm " Men from Princeton. List of soldiers buried in Princeton. Pensions. Act of 1818. Town Military records 1774-1814. Letter of Capt. John Jones to his Wife Mary in Princeton. Petition of former British Soldiers to be Naturalized. Muster Roll of Capt. Andrew Whitney's Company. How I found Oliver Mosman. The Shays Rebellion. Capt. Abraham Gale. Capt. Henry Gale; his Arrest, Trial, Conviction and Sentence to Death. Reprieved and Pardoned. List of Rebels taking the Oath of Allegiance. Treat- ing. Mexican War. Civil War. List of Soldiers in the Civil War. John D. Mirick Post, G.A.R. List of Princetown Soldiers who Died in the Service, 1861-1865 218-269 CHAPTER XI Biography. Hon. Moses Gill. Gill Mansion in Princeton. Robbery of Plate. Funeral. Inventory of Personal Estate. Ward Nicho- las Boylston. David Everett. Edward Savage. Daniel Davis. Edward Augustus Goodnow 270-301 CHAPTER XII Diary Kept by Elizabeth Fuller, Daughter of Rev. Timothy Fuller of Princeton. Family of Rev. Timothy Fuller. Reun- ion at the Old Homestead in Princeton 302-323 CHAPTER XIII Wachusett Legends. Mount Wachusett. Lucy Keyes, the Lost Child of Wachusett. Robert Keyes. Loss of the Child. Disre- garding Tradition. Petition for Relief. Rejection. The Letter of 1827. Variation in Name. Tilly Littlejohn. Chronology of Tilly Littlejohn. Analysis. Redemption Rock. Mt. Adams Cel- ebration. Whittier's Poem: Monadnock from Wachusett 324-349 CHAPTER XIV Miscellany. Princeton as a Summer Resort. Wachusett House. Prospect House, now the Princeton Inn. Mountain House. Grand View House. Mt. Pleasant House. Howard House. Harrington Farm. Pratt's Cottage. Woodland Cottage. Grimes House. Pine Hill House. Fernside. Summit House. Innholders and Taverns. Old Stores. Town Hay Scales. Market Wagons. Stage Lines through Princeton. Postmasters and Post Offices. viii Contents Page List of Princeton Post Offices in tlie United States. Railroads. Telephone Service. Ice Business in Princeton. Street Lighting. Cemeteries. Distances from Princeton Centre. Chair Manufac- turing in Princeton. Roper Lumber and Box Company 350-374 CHAPTER XV Gleanings. Freemasonry. Good Templars. Ancient Order of United Workmen. The Washington Benevolent Society. The Princeton Dramatic Club. Lyceum. Princeton Club. Princeton Farmer's Club. Princeton Grange No. 74. Patrons of Husbandry. Sana- torium. Flora of Princeton. Birds of Princeton. Bibliography of Princeton. Letters relating to Early Records of Rutland. Goodnow Memorial Building. Bagg Hall. Historical Data 375~4I4 Index 415-428 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Francis Everett Blake Frontispiece Princeton from East Jones Hill opposite page i Princeton from the Old Wachusett House " " 5 Wachusett from near Residence of T. H. Skinner.. " " 54 Petition for Incorporation " " 96 Rev. Thomas Prince " " 109 Title-page OF Discourse BY Rev. Timothy Harrington " " 122 Princeton Center from Wachusett House " " 170 Signatures of Town Clerks " " 191 Princeton School Houses — 1797-8-1906 " " 216 Signatures of Townsmen in 1776 " " 221 Lieut.-Gov. Moses Gill " " 270 Residence of Moses Gill " " 271 Sarah (Prince) Gill " " 272 Rebecca (Boylston) Gill " " 273 Ward Nicholas Boylston " " 278 Edward Savage " " 294 Sarah (Seaver) Savage ant> Edward Savage " " 296 Edward A. Goodnow " " 299 Princeton Center and Wachusett " " 325 The Nine O'CLOCK Mail " " 362 Princeton Village from the East " " 369 Cemetery and the Old Pound " " 369 Town Hall and Goodnow Memorl\l Buildings " " 403 HISTORY OF PRINCETON CHAPTER I THE TOWN IN 191 5 Situation and Area. Princeton, a town in Worcester County, Massachusetts, is situated about forty-eight miles north of west from Boston, fourteen miles north of Wor- cester, and about ten miles southwest from Fitchburg. It is bounded on the north by Westminster, on the east by Leominster and Sterling, on the south by Holden and Rutland, and on the west by Rutland and Hubbardston. The township is north of the center of the County, and about equi-distant from its eastern and western boundaries, and occupies a nearly central position in the State as measured from Cape Cod to New York. Its geographical position is (at Wachusett Mountain) 42° 29' 21-21" north latitude, 71° 53' 33-885" west longitude. Its present area is about 23,000 acres or 36.5 square miles. Surface. The general formation of this locality is rugged and uneven, with abrupt elevations and depres- sions in general, and exceptional plains and meadows, giving diversity and natural beauty to the scenery. The principal hills are Little Wachusett, about 1560 feet, and Pine Hill 1440 feet, both situated in the northerly part of the town, the southern portion being lower with more meadow land. Wachusett Mountain, the principal elevation and most striking natural feature in the town, rises to a height of 2018 feet. This is in the extreme northerly part, near the boundary line of Westminster. With the exception of the 2 History of Princeton range in the westerly part of the State, of which Mt. Grey- lock is the main eminence, Wachusett is the highest eleva- tion within its boundaries, and its isolation affords from the summit an unobstructed view over a large part of Massachusetts and some portions of adjoining states. The ocean at Boston, the Green Mountains in Vermont, and elevations in New Hampshire are visible in clear weather, while the surrounding country within a radius of seventy- five miles is spread before the observer. The ascent to the summit is easy, both by carriage road and paths, and the mountain top is visited by large numbers during the sum- mer season. A good hotel is maintained here during the warmer months of the year. The mountain, including a tract of 3000 acres, was made a State Reservation April 17, 1900, by Act of the Legislature. Ponds and Streams. On account of the elevation of the township there are no streams of considerable volume in Princeton. The waters have their origin on the height of the land near the mountain, and flow east and west. South Wachusett Brook is perhaps the most important stream, and with Cobb Brook flows into Quinapoxet Pond at the southeast corner of the town. This pond is the largest body of water wholly within the town limits. Wachusett Pond at the north lies mostly in Westminster, East Wachusett Brook is joined with Babcock Brook and flows into Still River, which runs on the boundary line between Princeton and Sterling for about 600 rods. Other small streams flow into Ware River at the southwest, and this continues to the Connecticut. Woodward, Wachu- sett, Jones, Turkey Swamp, Baker's, Sawin and Gardner meadows are the principal marshy tracts. The area of the meadow land in the town is estimated at 822 acres. Climate. The climate of Princeton, while not varying in great degree from that of the average of central Massa- chusetts, is, perhaps, from the elevated situation, more pronounced in alternation of heat and cold and in the extreme degrees of its temperature. The winters are bleak, with high winds, while the extreme heat in summer of the The Town in igi^ 3 lower townships is here tempered with refreshing breezes. Although trying to some constitutions, in general it can be said that the atmosphere is pure and bracing, and con- ducive to good health and longevity. The yearly rainfall is about forty inches; the temperature is about 45° average for the year; 22° in the winter, 65° in the summer. Soil. A large portion of the surface of the town is to-day uncultivated, and some of the original tillage land has been abandoned to nature or the mere raising of grass or to grazing. The causes which have affected the farming interests throughout New England have operated here with effects in strong contrast to those of fifty and one hundred years ago. The elevated situation of much of the land, as well as intractable soil, together with sharp alternations of temperature, made the cultivation of the more susceptible products difficult, and called forth the energies of a former generation, representatives of an element rare at the present time. Half a century ago many fine farms were tilled in the more favorable locations, and a few are maintained at present. Many of the abandoned farmsteads are now occupied by summer residents, and fine buildings have been erected for occupation during the warmer season. Land and Agricultural Products. The last state census (1905) gives the valuation of farm and agricultural prod- ucts as follows: land, $327,943; buildings, $223,139; machinery and implements, $35,674; domestic animals, $114,770; fruit trees and vines, $22,553; mines, quarries, etc., $880 = $724,943. Agricultural Products: dairy, $72,433; poultry, $9,892; meats, $1688; animal products, $14,612; cereals, $300; fruits, berries and nuts, $7,804; hay, straw and fodder, $85,690; vegetables, $7,540; wood products, $22,368; food products, $i,773 = $224,543. Natural Productions. These do not vary in great degree from those of the larger tract of central Massachusetts, except that perhaps in the generally elevated situation of this town some of the flora and less hardy vegetable pro- ductions are not found. The pine, chestnut, maple, oak, 4 History of Princeton walnut, birch, ash and beech are among the trees growing here. Most of the common wild flowers are found in great profusion, the mayflower and the mountain laurel being abundant. Wild Animals. The larger wild animals of the earlier period have been exterminated, but the smaller common pests exist — the catamount, skunk, woodchuck, fox and the smaller rodents. Rattlesnakes are rare, but black snakes and the common striped snake are found. The ponds and streams are so few that fish are not abundant. The common birds are in evidence and are migratory as in other parts of Massachusetts. Population. The number of inhabitants in Princeton has in general declined since 1840, from 1,347 in that year to 904 at the last census. Of this, 238 males and 203 females are single, and 206 males and 193 females married. There are 246 families in the town. The legal voters number 241. Health. The statistics compare favorably with those of other towns in Massachusetts. Manufactures. There are five manufacturing estab- lishments in the town — four private, and one incorporated. The amount of capital invested is $90,150; value of stock used, $37,372; value of goods produced, $113,097; persons employed, 76; wages paid, $26,023; salaries, $2,580. Other Occupations. There are 99 persons engaged in agriculture; 30 in transportation; 91 laborers; 18 in trade; 10 in government employ; 277 in domestic service; and 22 in professional occupations. Religious Organizations. Only one church, the Con- gregational, is now in existence. Schools. There are six schools maintained, at an ex- pense of $4,722. The Superintendent is paid $300 for services in the Town. Number of school children, 135; number of teachers, 11. The Public Library contains 6,201 volumes; value, $4,000. The endowment is $7,000, and the income $360. o Pi w o o H U o The Town in igi^ 5 The value of the building is $25,000. Salary of Librarian, $115. Newspaper. There is one newspaper The Laborer's Friend published in town. Telephone service places the town in possession of local and outside communications. Electric Lights are in operation in the streets, and are supplied to private residences. Conimunication. The Peterborough and Worcester Branch of the Boston and Maine Railroad passes through the southwestern part of the town. Geology. The foundation of the soil in Princeton is gneiss, one of the primary rocks of the earth's surface. This rock is composed mostly of quartz, mica and feldspar, with a lesser admixture of iron, which presents in places a rusty appearance. Otherwise stated, the formation is a coarse or uneven granite, the main constituents of which are silica, alumina and potassium. There are some evi- dences of slate formation in places, sand and other debris of alluvial action are evident in the lowlands, while boulders and relics of the drift period are abundant. Name. The town received its name in 1759 from the Rev. Thomas Prince of Boston, a distinguished divine and writer who was born in Sandwich, Massachusetts, in 1687 and died in Boston in 1758. Mr. Prince was one of the proprietors of the tract, and was interested in the formation and settlement of the town. History of Princeton TOWN APPROPRIATIONS, 1914 Highways and bridges $6,450 . 00 State road i , 1 50 . 00 State road extension 700 . 00 Schools 5.525 . 00 Salary of Superintendent 300 . 00 Transportation 600 . 00 Medical inspection 75-00 Salaries of Town officers 1 ,000 . 00 Fire department 500 . 00 Support of poor 700 . 00 Care of cemeteries 1 50 . 00 State aid 350 . 00 Interest on debts and loans 900 . 00 Salary of Librarian 1 15 . 00 Observance of Memorial Day 100 . 00 Gypsy and brown tail moth extermination 300.00 Street lights 750 . 00 Board of health 200 . 00 Total, including other expenses $21,639.00 TABLE OF AGGREGATES 1. Number of residents assessed on property, individuals 221, all others, 45, Total 266. 2. Number of non-residents assessed on property, individuals 107, all others 47, Total 154. 3. Number of persons assessed on property 420, poll tax only, 133, Total 553- 4. Number of male polls assessed, 284. 5. Tax on each male poll, $2.00. 6. Value of assessed personal estate, excluding resident bank stock, $583,042. Resident bank stock, none. Total $583,042. 7. Value of assessed real estate buildings, excluding land, $534,525. Land, excluding buildings, $367,561. Total, $902,086. 8. Total valuation of assessed estate April i, 1914, $1,485,128. 9. Tax for State, County and Town purposes, including overlaying: On personal estate $9,620.19 On real estate 14,884.42 On polls 568.00 Total $25,072.61 The Town in 1Q15 TABLE OF AGGREGATES, Continued 10. Rate of total tax on $1000, $16.50. 11. Number of horses assessed, 272. 12. Number of cows assessed, 599. 13. Number of sheep assessed, 19. 14. Number of neat cattle other than cows assessed, 274. 15. Number of swine assessed, 47. 16. Number of dwelling houses assessed, 250. 17. Number of acres of land assessed, 21,423. 18. Number and value of fowls assessed, No. 4,027, value, $2,416. TOWN ASSETS Amount remaining in General Fund .... $3,092 . 25 Deducted from appropriations 18,546 . 75 County tax i ,974 . 00 State tax 4,287 . 50 State highway tax 157.96 Overlay 1 06 . 40 Total $25,072 . 61 Moth tax 673 . 43 CHAPTER II THE EARLY PERIOD District of Prince Town. On October, 1759, certain tracts of land known as Rutland East Wing, and Water- town Farms, as well as others in Worcester County, Mass- achusetts, comprising about fifteen thousand acres, were, by Act of the General Court, made a District, to which the name of Prince Town was given. This allotment, with sev- eral additions made at later times, formed the present town of Princeton. At the time this Act was passed the storm and stress period of the early settlement of New England had passed. The fierce conflicts with the aborigines had ended in the triumph of the white man, and in the fierce struggles with the forces of nature the powers of sturdy humanity and of civilization had prevailed. The territory now included within the boundaries of this town was one of the few tracts in the State which was unoccupied at that time. Princeton, in its early history, can present little to dis- tinguish it among the groups of older townships by which it is surrounded, its existence as a municipality cover- ing a period only of a little more than one hundred and fifty years. The stories so often repeated in the histories of the older towns of the State, of the methods and habits of colonial life, the struggles for existence against the forces of nature and the attacks of a savage foe, with provisions for the security of property and rights against the encroachments of power, have little place in the annals of Princeton, which attained its corporate existence after the greater part of Massachusetts had been alloted and secured, and after the period of Indian warfare had passed. The settlement of this and other places at this time was 8 The Early Period 9 the natural outcome of the earUer New England energy and enterprise, which was now quieting down to the con- templation of possession and improvement, the spirit of unrest and the propensity to acquirement proving as strong motives as some of the higher elements with which we are perhaps too much inclined to invest the acts of our ances- tors. Some of the qualities seem to stand out in marked contrast to the characteristics of the present age, but it is probable that the emergencies of the time developed them into prominence and activity, and that a stress of circumstances would again bring forth these or similar powers to meet the necessities. There is a strain in every generation which comes to the front when the alarm of danger or the call for assistance is sounded. The first settlement of Europeans within the limits of the present State of Massachusetts was at Plymouth in 1620, and nine years later that of Salem was made. Boston was founded in 1630, and various other places in the sur- rounding country were established within the next twenty- five years. Soon the course of expansion extended into the region to the westward, though in several directions. On the northerly line Lancaster, now comprising several towns, was purchased of the Indians in 1643. Mendon, at the south, was founded in 1659. In the central line Worcester and Oxford followed, and further to the west Brookfield, and so on to Springfield and Deerfield, and into Connecticut. Nipnet or Nipmug Country. To the inhabitants of the first settlements of the colony of the Massachusetts Bay all of the territory to the westward was known by the general name of the Nipnet or Nipmug country, the authorities having but little definite understanding of the extent of the tribe of Indians bearing that name. Gover- nor Winthrop, in his journal, under date of January 27, 1 63 1, gives the same characterization of this country when he describes a trip made into the interior by himself and others. Going up the Charles River above Watertown at a point at or near the present Waltham " they went up 10 History of Princeton a very high rock from whence they might see all over Neipnett." From this rock they espied " a very high hill due west about forty miles off," which hill was Wachusett Mountain, doubtless then, at least, unknown by that name to the colonists.^ Indians. Although it seems probable that the Nipnets, once a large and powerful tribe, ruled over this whole territory, yet the Nipmuck country, later described by Gookin and other reliable authorities, was practically confined to what is now the southern half of Worcester County, extending into Connecticut. Nipnet signifies " fresh water country," and one writer says that the various tribes of Indians in that vicinity have often been classed together under the general name of Nipnets, i.e., all fresh water Indians. And there is not wanting evi- dence that the Quabaugs, the Washakums, Nashaways, Wachusetts and others, were more or less nearly allied either by blood or by marriage, or by both, but it is certain that they never acknowledged allegiance to one local head chieftain. The Quabaugs made their headquarters near Brookfield and the Nashaways lived north of the Nipnets near Lan- caster. These were sometimes called Waschakums, from a large settlement of the tribe near the ponds of that name in Sterling, and sometimes called Wachusetts from the stronghold in the mountain of that name in Princeton. Exploration. As the spirit of adventure developed among the colonists, and their desire to explore the country increased, or the wish to remove from the growing towns on the coast led them to seek new locations, their knowledge of the abode of the various Indian tribes and the territory which they claimed as their own became clearer. In 1 63 1 John Winthrop and his associates first heard from some visiting Indians of the great river — Connecti- cut — to the westward with its fertile valleys. Almost immediately not only adv'enturers but some of the best of the settlers directed their feet along the then unfamiliar paths, or followed the well-defined Indian trails, with the ' This rock now known as Boston Rock. The Early Period ii hope of finding more promising surroundings than were presented on the coast. New settlements were projected and developed in a surprisingly short time, considering the many obstacles which had to be encountered. In 1633 John Oldham and others journeyed over the wild and undeveloped country into Connecticut by paths probably never before trodden by the white man, and subject to the unknown perils of an unknown land. Other groups fol- lowed very soon to explore this western country. Large companies from Watertown, Cambridge and Dorchester journeyed to Connecticut and there began new settlements. In 1635 William Pynchon and associates went from Rox- bury to the Connecticut River and soon laid the foundation of what is now the flourishing city of Springfield. The " Old Connecticut Path," of which the colonists had some knowledge as early as 1630, passed through Cambridge, Waltham, thence through South Framingham, Hopkinton, Grafton, Dudley, Sturbridge to Woodstock and on to Hartford. It was a branch of this path which passed westward through Brookfield to Springfield. A new way became known as early as 1648, as Winthrop records in his Journal, in that year: " This year a new way was found out to Connecticut by Nashaway which avoids much of the hilly way." Whether this path branched off, as is thought by some, from the earlier Connecticut path perhaps near Sudbury, and passed through what is now Lancaster, Rutland, and New Braintree to Springfield, it is difficult to decide, but the inference is drawn from this statement of Winthrop that this northern way had not been in use to any extent by the English previous to the year 1648. Lancaster, which was settled in 1653, had been obliged to build roads, or more properly speaking, paths, to bring the settlement into closer touch with Sudbury and other towns, and these paths would naturally be utilized and form a portion of the long road from the coast. It is possible that instead of passing through Princeton it may have gone south of that line and passed through Holden 12 History of Princeton and thence to Quabaug Pond in West Brookfield, or this Holden route may have been established at a later date. The Bay Path, so often referred to, was laid out in 1670, and passed through Marlborough and Worcester to Brook- field, and on to the River, By means, therefore, of these travelled paths the general character of this part of the colony became somewhat known, but there was no at- tempt at making a settlement in the region about the mountain. There was no town settled for many years between Sudbury or Lancaster and Brookfield. Land Purchases. By the year 1680 settlements had been commenced, and as the desire of the colonists for extending their domains increased, the General Court of the Colony, acknowledging the inherent rights of the Indian tribes as owners of the soil, had purchased many tracts of land in the different localities, some of them em- bracing many square miles in area. Individuals had little difficulty in obtaining grants of the land thus pur- chased, and in cases where they had traded directly with the Indians, the Colony very freely confirmed the title. Nipmuck Territory. In pursuance of this general policy the General Court in 1681 appointed William Stoughton and Joseph Dudley, Esquires, a committee to negotiate, in behalf of the Colony, with the Nipmugs (Nipmucks) for their territory, the name Nipmuck still being applied to this neighborhood. In the first report of progress which these gentlemen rendered they stated that " the northern part near Wachusett is still unpurchased, and persons yet scarcely to be found meet to be treated with thereabouts." In other words they had not been able to find the true owners of this northern part, which suggests a long dis- persion of the tribes once identified with its occupancy and ownership. A report made by this committee a few months later indicates decided progress in the search for those who were thought to hold title to the lands. After referring to the vicinity of Marlborough and Sherburne they say, " The northerne part, adjoyning to Nashaway is The Early Period 13 found the best land, most meadowed and capable of setle- ment, which land, except a small tract that Hananamesit desired to be kept by the Natick Indians, may, wee sup- pose, vpon reasonable termes, be so farr as respects the Indian Clayme, taken into the Countreys lands, which wee offer our advise as best to be donne, least the matter grow more difficult by delays." ^ One tract, perhaps not now clearly identified, of large extent, was purchased for the sum of £30 and a coat, while another tract 50 miles long and 20 miles broad was bought for the snug sum of £50, delivered in cash to the supposed owners, or at least to the representatives of the Nipmucks, who appeared to have some claims upon proprietorship. But notwithstanding the advice of the excellent com- mittee the Colony made no move towards purchasing this " northern part adjoining to Nashaway," and it remained for individuals to take the first steps toward the purchase of a portion of it. Whether the prominent men identified with this purchase were restless in the confines of their own town and anxious to expand and enlarge those borders, or whether they were actuated by the same spirit of specu- lation which in every age prevails, may not be determined, but it is true that Lancaster men, with a few associates, reached out their hands for a bit of this territory and secured a tract, reported to be twelve miles square, for the sum of £22^1 — about 10 cents for 100 acres. There are many deeds upon record showing conveyances of land by representatives of various Indian tribes, for which valuable compensation was made. The valuation of these lands as indicated by the deeds may seem ridicu- lously small to the present reader, but the value of the dollar in that day was far greater than that of the dollar of to-day. One historian asserts that the price paid the Indians for the land in a certain town was fully up to the price set upon the individual lots sold to the settlers by the proprietors. ' Mass. Bay Records, V'ol. V, page 242. 14 History of Princeton Purchasers. The majority of the purchasers of the tract referred to above were of Lancaster; the two Willard Brothers, their brother-in-law, Cyprian Stevens, and Joseph Rowlandson, the minister of the town, with others of less prominence; and these purchasers in a general way explored their purchase, noted its streams and ponds, its hills and valleys, following, it may be, the trails of the Indians as well as the " path " now somewhat worn and well-defined by the travel between the Bay settlement and the interior. And is it not probable that in some of their expeditions they stepped aside from the beaten path and ascended the mountain to view the country? Per- haps they were the first, or among the first white men to climb its rugged sides, now so easily travelled by means of well-known paths and well-made roads. Indian Deed. The first step showing concerted action looking towards the occupation of the territory under con- sideration appears in a deed dated December 22nd, 1686, recorded in Middlesex Registry, Vol. XVI, page 511, under date of April 14th, 1714. By this deed Joseph Trask alias Puagastion of Penni- cook, Job alias Pompomamay of Natick, and Simon Pitacum alias Wananacompan of Wamasick, Sosowonow of Natick, and James Wiser alias Qualapunit of Natick for the sum of twenty-three pounds, conveyed to Henry Willard, Joseph Rowlandson, Joseph Foster, Benjamin Willard and Cyprian Stevens, " a Certain Tract of Lands, medows, swamps. Timbers, Entervailes, containing Twelve mile square, according to the buts and bounds, as followeth, viz: — The name in General being Naguag, The South Corner butting upon Muscopaug Pond, and running North to Quenibeck and to Wonketopick, and so running upon Gte Wachusett which is the North Corner, so running nor west to Walamanumpscook, and so to quaquanunawick a little pond and so to ' Asnaconcomick ' pond which is the nor west corner. And so running South and so to Musshauge a great swamp, so to Sasaketasick which is the South corner. And so running East to Pascatickquage The Early Period 15 and so to Ahampatimshauge a little Pond, and so to Sum- pauge Pond and so to Muscopauge pond which is the East Corner." ^ Delay in Occupation. The condition of political affairs in the colonies at the time of this purchase and for several subsequent years appears to have been a sufficient reason for delay in carrying out any plans formed by the pro- prietors for the settlement or sale of the land. The abrogation of the first charter of the colony by King James II in 1686 was soon followed by the appointment of Sir Edmund Andros as Governor of New England, his arrival occurring in December of that year. This appointment, which possibly at first promised favorably to the colonies, proved exceedingly embarrassing and unsatisfactory. Restless under the new administration, smarting under the blow of the dissolution of the charter, the people gladly availed themselves of the confusion existing in England, anticipated the accession to the throne of William of Orange, and violently deposed Andros from his position in April, 1688. It was not until 1692 that the second charter was secured, and in the meantime hostilities be- tween France and England had been declared, and for seven or eight years the colonies were in the midst of the excitement, anxiety and uneasiness appertaining to war, giving of their means, their men and their energy to help forward the cause of England. Queen Anne's War. After the close of the war in 1698 comparative quiet reigned in the country for a few years, but in 1702 the lull in the strife was succeeded by another war known as Queen Anne's, which for ten or more years left its disturbing influence upon the country, embarrass- ing its progress in every direction, and hindering the growth of the new as well as of the older settlements. Lands in the regions beyond the bounds of civilization * The original deed is not in existence, and the above copy and that on the Proprietors books do not agree in the spelling of the Indian names. The latter has Wananapan, Quanitick, etc. Simon Pitacum apparently did not sign the deed. 1 6 History of Princeton were practically of no value while these disturbances prevailed. The events of that period of New England history between the years 1675 and 1713 were sufficient to cripple all business activity and to strike a blow at all progressive movements. Lancaster, Worcester, North- field, Brookfield and other towns had suffered severely from depredation of the Indians during King Philip's and the subsequent wars. New settlements begun with a good degree of energy were almost depopulated or entirely abandoned. Return of the Settlers. But upon the close of Queen Anne's War in 17 13 confidence was somewhat restored. The dangers which had threatened public and private enterprise were seemingly arrested if not removed, and the towns over which had hung the clouds of sorrow, fear and desolation began to assume new life and activity. The former residents turned once more to the cultivation of their abandoned or neglected farms, and new adventurers cast their lot with the old. However, with the experience of the past years and the uncertainty of the future, it was not strange that the growth of these settlements was com- paratively slow. It was at this time — perhaps the only opportune time since the purchase in 1686 — that the pro- prietors of Naquag and their heirs considered the subject of opening the land for settlement and making the property a better paying investment than it hitherto had proved. Although the original purchasers had secured a deed from the Indians who claimed that " they only had power to convey and alienate the same," they had not acquired any confirmatory title from the authorities of the Colony, who held possession by virtue of a charter granted by the King. It is also true that the whole territory known as the Nip- mug Country of which this tract doubtless formed a part was sold by Sholan, the Sagamore. Title Worthless. The title, therefore, was practically worthless, and the heirs of the original purchasers sought relief from the General Court, which passed an Act on the 23rd of February, 17 14, confirming to the sons and grand- The Early Period 17 sons of Major Simon Willard and their associates, the orig- inal tract, with the exception of 1000 acres belonging to the Honorable Samuel Sewall. It docs not clearly appear why these lands were confirmed to all the children and representatives of the deceased children of Major Willard, embracing as it did some persons not included in the original purchase. This act provided " that within seven years there then be sixty families settle thereon and suffi- cient Land reserved for a Gospel Ministry and Schooling. And that the Grant shall encrouch upon no former Grant or Grants, nor exceed the Quantity of Twelve Miles Square. The town to be called Rutland, & to ly to the County of Middlesex." Name of Rutland. In reference to the naming of the township Judge Sewall says in his Diary under date of Feb. 23-24, 1713-14: " This Court a large township, of 12 miles square, is granted near Wadchuset; out of which my 1,000 Acres are excepted. I was surpris'd, not having seen it, till 'twas pass'd by the Deputies. Gov^ is uneasy till the word Associats be inserted. Will have it call'd Rutland: I objected because that was the name of a Shire. The Chief Justice said 'twas not convenient except the Land was Red. But the Gov'^ would not be diverted. I suppose the quantity might be one thing inclin'd his Excellency to this Name." ^ Judge Sewall's special interest in this arose from his ownership of the 1,000 acres excepted in the Act of the General Court. This plot was originally granted by the Colony in 1681 to the six youngest children of Major Simon Willard, in consideration of the distinguished and unremunerated services of the father, lately deceased. This tract, called Sewall's Farms, was in the northerly part of the present town of Rutland, and embraced much excellent farming land. In March 1684-85 the Willards obtained from Thomas Dublett and wafe, Sarah, Indians, a release of all their (presumed) right in the premises, upon the payment of £2.10, and in 1693 the elder brother, 1 Vol. II, page 425. 1 8 History of Princeton Henry Willard, purchased it. After his decease it was sold in 1692 to the Hon. Samuel Sewall to cancel a debt of £84. Soon after the confirmation of the township to the Willards and their Associates, Judge Sewall obtained from the General Court an Act confirming the title of his little lot of 1,000 acres, the boundaries of which cannot be traced today. It seems singular that in the deed of the twelve miles square, no mention is made of this 1,000 acres which lay within its limits, but perhaps the matter of a paltry 1,000 acres out of 93,000 may not have been thought worth considering. Thus it appears that both tracts (one within the other) were now held by indisputable title acquired by purchase of the Indians claiming right therein and by Act of confirmation of the General Court of the Province. Names of Associates. It is noticeable that the Indians conveying the smaller tract in 1684-85 did not join in the deed of the larger tract in 1686. The grantees of Rutland township and their Associates executed a deed of Associa- tion under date of April 14-17 which was recorded August 17, 1 718 in Middlesex Registry, Vol. 19, page 293. The property was divided into 33 shares of which Joseph Foster had two and the others one each. The names of the Associates are as follows: Joseph Foster of Billerica. Cyprian Stevens of Lancaster for self and for children by wife Mary. Thomas How of Marlborough, Att'y & Assign of heirs of Jos. Rowlandson. Simon Willard of Salem. John Willard of Concord. Benjamin Willard, Framingham. Joseph Willard, London. Josiah Willard's heirs. Samuel Willard's heirs. Henry Willard's heirs. Daniel Willard's heirs. Jonathan Willard's heirs. The Early Period 19 Thomas of Sudbury and Hannah, his wife, a daughter of Simon Wiliard. Nathaniel Howard of Chelmsford, children by Sarah Willard. Robert Blood, late of Concord, children by Elizabeth Willard. Joshua Edwards, late of Charlestown, children by Mary Willard. Hon. Wm. Taylor of Dorchester. Peter Townsend. Paul Dudley. Addington Davenport. Adam Winthrop. Thomas Hutchinson. Thomas Fitch. John White of Boston. Thomas How of Marlborough. John Chandler of Woodstock. William Dudley of Roxbury. John Farnsworth of Groton. Children and heirs of Peter Bulkley, late of Concord. Moses Parker of Chelmsford. Jacob Stevens of Stow. The New Township embraced in area nearly one-tenth of the County of Worcester, and was considered a very large grant even for the days when the authorities were lavish with their gifts of land. Grants of a few hundred acres were apparently freely made for all sorts of reasons, as will be noted hereafter in connection with some Prince- ton land. But in this case the character of the petitioners, and the services of Major Willard to the Colony, would naturally debar any serious objections to the confirmation of a purchase, which wisely included in its provisions lands for new settlements of advantage to the Province. The accompanying plan indicates plainly the extent of the township of Rutland as originally granted, and the towns then included within its limits. 20 History oj Princeton BA^/:f^ <^^^AW/l/ / "^(yssAyq-os 7~0A/ ^(yr^A/o I ^"^'^Cero^ Plan of Rutland Township. From the Original. The Early Period 21 Proprietors. At the first meeting of the Proprietors held in Boston on the 14th of April, 17 14, of which Paul Dudley, Esq., of Boston was Moderator and Mr. Samuel Wright of Sudbury, Clerk, the establishment of a town was considered and the Committee consisting of William Dud- ley, Esq., Thomas How, Esq., Captain Jacob Stevens, Captain Jonathan Prescott and Mr. Samuel Wright, was appointed to " Look after the Plating said town, and establishing Inhabitants there, and to Report to the Proprietors the most convenient place for settling a town- ship, and the best method in their Judgment for the Incorageing Inhabitants to settle in said Town." The next meeting was held on the 24th of December, 1715, at the Green Dragon in Boston, when it was voted " that the contents of Six Miles Square be Surveyed & set off for the Settlement of Sixty-two families in order to the performance of the Grant. — That the place for the settle- ment be determined by the Committee already chosen for settling the Town." The details of the surveys, settlements, distribution of lots and the thousand and one matters necessary to be attended to, were left to the Committee above named, thus obviating the necessity of holding frequent meetings of the Proprietors. First Birth. The Settlement soon gave evidence of gradual but solid growth, though it is probable that for the first few years the winter months were passed by a majority of the settlers in the towns where the comforts of life were greater, and the necessary supplies for the family more readily secured. The event of the birth of the first male child there occurred in 1719 (a son of Moses and Eunice How), and was appropriately recognized by the Proprietors in the gift of one hundred acres of land to the young man. Some fifty families were now on the spot, comprising representatives from Boston, Concord, Sud- bury, Marlborough and other towns, and also emigrants of respectability from Ireland. A meeting house was erected, and provision made for the support of the ministry 22 History of Princeton and school, in compliance with the conditions imposed by the General Court in the Act confirming the lands to the Proprietors, and on the 30th of May, 1722, the town of Rutland was incorporated. Thereafter the Proprietors of the township (the " Grand Proprietors " as they have been styled) had no authority over the " Six Mile Square " or " Settlers " part. The individual lands within the town limits were distributed among the Settlers at various times or sold for the benefit of the whole, — until the entire area had been disposed of, the records finally closing in the year 1797. These records are now in the care of the Town of Princeton, and deposited in the Town Library. Sales and Transfers. During the years of preparatory work culminating in the organization of a separate town within the bounds of the proprietorship, there had been many changes among the Associates by reason of death and transfer of shares. These transfers do not appear to have assumed, at any time, any degree of speculative tendency, although as early as 17 14 we find record of a sale by Captain Samuel Wright of a share for forty pounds, which he had purchased for thirty-five pounds only a month before. The original price, twenty-three pounds, paid the Indians for the whole tract was doubtless satisfactory to them, possibly foreseeing as they might that the lands could be of but little value to them with the advancing march of the white man. During the long period of thirty years before any attempt was made to improve or realize upon the investment, it is quite certain that the value was not eaten up by taxes, as these were not assessed by the colony, whatever might be counted as loss of interest upon the sum advanced. But in reading the records of the meetings of the Proprietors one can but notice the uneasiness caused by delays of projected settlements, the apparent lack of inter- est, and the meetings for financial questions to be solved. To meet the oft-repeated calls for money required by the maintenance of the few highways and bridges which the increasing travel from the seaboard to the interior de- manded, resort was sometimes had to sale of lots, and quite The Early Period 23 often to assessments upon the share holders. And there is evidence of unwillingness on the part of some of the share holders to meet the collection of these assessments, dodging the payment of the tax. There is no doubt that the financial embarrassment induced some to sell their shares to others having more faith in the enterprise. And it is reasonable to infer that the later purchasers, at least, realized a fair return for their investment, especially when they held corner lots w^ith meadows and uplands of corre- sponding value. In 1724 a share was sold for £200. With the establishment of the town well underway, the Proprietors considered plans for the future, anticipating the movements of the progressive New Englander in pushing out over the frontiers " beyond the confines of settlement and civilization." The remaining land of the Township was divided into sections known as the North- west Quarter, now Barre, the Northeast Quarter, now Hubbardston, the East Wing, now Princeton, and the West Wing. East Wing. The first reference upon the Proprietors' records to the East Wing, w^hich eventually formed one- half of Princeton, is under date March 26, 17 18, when it was voted '* that the Two Large Tracts or parcels of land belonging to the Proprietors of Rutland on the East and on the West of the township of the Settlers' part be divided each into three and thirty or sixty-six farmes for the three and thirty Proprietors, or whole shares, as Equally as may be per Quantity and Quality any Large Tracts of meadow to be Reserved as Common for the whole and each share to have its proportion." The following June the Com- mittee having charge of the survey was urged to " take care " that these tracts " forthwith and with all possible Expedition be Laid out — with all suitable accommodations of ways for or to Each farme or lott." The survey of the Wing was completed during the following summer and plans prepared. The original is probably not in existence, but among some papers found in Rutland a few years since was a small copy. There are evidences of errors of the 24 History of Princeton copyist both in names and descriptions of the lots, but it is sufficiently accurate to show the method of division and to enable one to determine the present locations. The Wing was divided into 48 lots of about 237 acres each, 33 being numbered consecutively i to 33, twelve " let- tered " lots A to M, and three meadow lots, " Potitivater," " Wachiisett " and " Deadmare.'' There were also six " Gores " on the northwesterly end, containing in all about 237 acres. Many of the lines forming the boundaries of these lots are still to be seen in the town, and all of them can be readily traced. The easterly line of Lot B is a few rods in the rear of the present Town Hall, and in the spring or autumn standing on the hill one can trace the sectional lines by the walls through valleys and over hills almost to Rutland. Father Ralle's War. With these plans before them the Proprietors held a meeting November 5, 1718, at whid^ 25 of the 33 share holders were represented. An assess- ment was ordered to cover a balance of £133, 18.4 for expenditures incurred in surveys and for other necessary charges. Before, however, the consummation of any plans for settlement could be effected, new perplexities arose, occasioned by the commencement of hostilities by the Indians in the war known as Lovewell's or the Father Ralle's war, in 1722. Discontent had arisen among the Abenakis or Eastern Indians, resulting from real or fancied wrongs in the taking of their lands, and this was fostered and fomented by the machinations of the French officials in Canada. The terrible scenes of King Philip's war were renewed, villages were burned, men, women and children massacred or carried into captivity. Great fear was felt in the interior settlements, and many villages were almost deserted. Massacre in Rutland. In Rutland the exposure and consequent danger appeared so great that a large propor- tion of the families, perhaps two-thirds, left the town, seeking security in the settlements on the coast and else- where. On the 14th of August, 1723, five Indians entered The Early Period 25 the town, waylaid and killed the minister, Rev. Joseph Willard, and two children of Deacon Joseph Stevens, taking captive two others of the Deacon's children. The inhabitants promptly called upon the Province for soldiers, and although a small guard was sent there, great difficulty was experienced In securing a number that could be in any degree efficient. Other towns all along the border were demanding similar protection, and the authorities were unprepared to cope successfully with the emergency. Though quiet prevailed during the following winter, the enemy were on the alert in the spring, and notwithstanding the watchfulness of the guard and the inhabitants, another raid was made upon the town on the third of August, when three men were killed. All through the summer the people of Groton, Dunstable, Lancaster, Rutland and other exposed towns were calling for soldiers to protect their houses and to guard the men in the fields making their hay and gathering their crops. In July of that year the mili- tary guard about Rutland numbered but 38 men. But the second attack upon Rutland not only aroused the inhabitants and quickened the vigilance of the soldiers but stimulated the government to active measures, resulting in a very material increase of the military force in this vicinity as well as in other places of anticipated danger. The incidents connected with this war belong more properly to the history of Rutland. A treaty of peace was signed in December, 1725, and hostilities ceased. Some of the absent families returned to the town, but many others sold or abandoned their farms and made homes elsewhere. In December, 1727, there were but about 25 families there, and for some years thereafter the progress was slow. Still there was a growth, and as gradually the fear of Indian invasion was lessened, matters resumed the ordinary aspect of a rural settlement. Renewal of Settlement. The disturbances of these years of war between 1722 and 1726 were a serious em- barrassment to the Proprietors of the township. The establishment of new towns was not only retarded but 26 History of Princeton rendered impossible and all of the operations of the Pro- prietors practically ceased. In October, 1733, Adam Winthrop, Esq., Rev. Thomas Prince and others took the necessary legal steps for calling a meeting of the share holders, which was held at the Royal Exchange Tavern in Boston on the 7th of November following, there being present thirteen gentlemen representing 11^ shares. A Committee consisting of Messrs. Adam Winthrop, Samuel Willard, Estes Hatch, Richard Bill and Francis Brinley was appointed for the general management of the affairs, and it was ordered that a new survey or renewal of bounds of the East and West Wings, and the northern half of Rutland be made. To meet the anticipated cost of this with other necessary expenses, a tax of £10 per share was laid. A full list of the fortunate owners of the shares at that time with their respective tax appears on the records. New Survey. Two surveyors, Samuel Willard and Henry Lee, appeared willing to undertake the survey at the same price, but Mr. Willard offered some small induce- ment and the contract was given to him. Subsequently he made an arrangement with Mr. Lee and the latter sur- veyed the East and West Wings, doubtless commencing the work as early in the year of 1734 as the season per- mitted. For this work Mr. Lee received £100 with £7 additional for the division of the three meadow lots. The distribution of the unassigned land in the East Wing soon followed as appears by the following record : " The Division of the unappropriated Lettered Lots, Gores and Gussets in the East and West Wings in the Southern half part of y"" Township of Rutland in y^ County of Worcester, being after y*^ Rate of One hundred & fifty- eight acres to Each of the Thirty three whole Shares ac- cording as the said Divisions are described in a plat of each wing laid by the Committee before y*" Proprietors of y'' s"^ Township (Exclusive of y^ Settlers part) at their meeting by adjournment y^ 24th day of Septemb'" 1734, ^t the Royall Exchange Tavern in Boston. The East Wing Cont"" 237 Acres in Each Lot. The Early Period 27 Letter M 79 acres In y^ Southerly part to heirs of Peter Boul- key. Claimed by Capt. John Boulkey & Rev. Mr. Benj. Prescot. 138 ac In North y to Adant WInthrop. A 7 ac In South y to John Willard claimed by Thos. Prince. 72 very Rocky adjoining Northerly on the 2^ seven acres Sixty three acres to Thos. Prince. Nine acres to Wm. Allen. 158 Joseph Rowlandson now Wm. Allen. B 79 In West y Joseph Willard now Mrs. Hannah Fayerweather. 79 adj. East Simon Willard now Wm. Salter. 79 Eastermost Henry Willard now John Dolbear 5 c 6 -'• Samuel Wlllard's sister Leland \. C 79 South y Simon Willard — Rich'' Bill. 158 North y Daniel Willard — heirs. D 79 West y Moses Parker — Sami Hatch. 158 Josiah Willard — heirs. E 79 Jacob Stevens T.P. 158 Paul Dudley T.P. F 79 John Willard T.P. 158 Thos. How T.P. P.S. Claiming John W's whole right in y® East Wing autg to 86 ac in this Division 79 ac are laid out In this lot & the other 7 In lot H. G 79 Joshua Edmunds Sam' Waldo 112 Joseph Foster 20 Robert Blood heirs 26 Moses Parker H 158 in West y Wm. Taylor Francis Brinley. 79 East Cyprian Stevens Sec^ Willard. I 7 West y & Gore Cyp. Stevens by his wife Mary Willard. 28 History of Princeton *" i?8 Ad? ■'"'"''' ^°''^' I ^^'"' ^^''''''° T^ ^ J 1 T- ^ f Jona Oulton, Cor- JLast y Joseph roster ] ,. „. ,, ■^ -' ^ [ nelius Waldo 112 Eastermost & Gore Thos. Fitch. Fitch Gore 59 acres. K Granted to first Minister of Rutland. L 79 Cyp. Stevens 79 Joseph Willard t Estes Hatch 79 Penn. Townsend J Gores a 7 ac. Jos. Foster Saml Waldo. b 20 Thos. Brintnal Widow Hannah formerly Willard. c 33 John Chandler heirs Eben'^ Allen, d 46 Thos. Fitch Fitch e 59 Divided with I. f 72 Cyp. Stevens heirs by wife, Saml Waldo. Gift to Rev. Mr. Prince. Plans of these lots were made and ordered to be put upon record, but unfortunately do not appear thereon. The Proprietors granted to Rev. Mr. Prince " In consideration of the great care & labour he has taken in calculating & Computing y^ Divisions above mentioned & other good Services perform 'd to the proprietors," y2 acres of land in lot A " Not having been set ofT to any of the proprietors by reason of the broken- ness of it." Mr. Prince prepared many of the plans of the Rutland lands, some of which are still in existence, and show excellent workmanship. November 26, 1735. Division of Meadow Lots " The Northerly " Southerly End lines of the Three Lots in y^ s*^ East Wing are supposed to be 191 1 poles in length & their Easterly & Westerly side lines to be 200 poles in length, whether they be really longer or shorter: These lots are here Divided: & the several Divisions The Early Period 29 Numbered, including both the medow & the Upland contained in y*" s'^ medow lots, as the plat Describes them : with the express intention, y* s*^ medow lots are exactly as larg & broad as the plat Describes them, then the s"^ Divisions must be exactly for Length and Breadth as they are therein described; but if the s*^ medow Lots are really larger or lesser, than their s*^ Division must be answerbly larger or lesser; & the particular owners of the Divisions in the several medow Lots must take care by agreement, or otherwise to state the Bounds of their Respective Divisions among themselves." " One acre of medow valued as three acres of upland." Wachusett I. 21 medow 86 Upland Paul Dudley, Thos. How, John Willard) \ Jacob Ste- vens) Thos. Prince. " Samuel Willard's heirs. 1 " Moses Parker = Oulton & Waldo. " T. Hutchinson. heirs Jos. Rowlandson = Wm. Allen (formerly granted Allen). VI. 4 " 23 Thos. Prince, Dec. 26, 1734. II. 2 130 »i IqSO III. 36O M 60 I IV. 6i »» 27i V. 2 M 41 9 Dead Mare^ I. II. III. 21 22| Upland 45 i6| Cyprian Stevens = to Sect^ Willard. Col. Taylor = F. Brinley. Jos. Willard = Hannah Fayr- weather. * In a report by Capt. Wright of Rutland, July 10, 1725, the following ref- erence is made to this locality, which indicates the origin of the name by which it was for many years known. " Our people are now beginning to mow their out meadows we shall want a Strong guard, one Scout Came in Last night dis- covered no Indians; tho the watch at one of the garisons Discovered an Indian as they say 2 nights agoe by a Garison as they lay at some distance, this morn- ing we found a mare as we Sopose Shot & Dead & Sopose the Indians shot her." 30 History of Princeton IV. 3 I4f " Penn Townsend = Anthony Stoddard. V. 6 100 Joseph Foster, Joshua Ed- munds, Moses Parker, Cyp- rian Stevens, Robert Blood = Saml Waldo. VI. 8 22 Upland Cyprian Stevens, Joseph Willard, Penn Townsend = E. Hatch. Poutwater I- 32 34^^° Adam Winthrop. II. 90 rods30^°'^ Adam Winthrop, Dec. 26, 1734. III. 15! Peter Boulkey's heirs = Capt. John Bulkly & Benj. Prescot. IV. 7I 23^° John White = ^ heirs, \ James Pemberton, \ Saml Sewall. V. 10 14^^*' Wm. Dudley = Col. Isaac Winslow. VI. 6f 25'^° Josiah Willard's heirs. VII. 6| 25I John Farnsworth = ^ Benj. Brown, \ B. Dyer, \ John Buttolph. VIII. 5f 27100 Simon Willard = ^ Wm. Salter, i Rich-^ Bill. Thus the whole area of the East Wing was equitably divided among the proprietors. Similar divisions were made of the other lands, settlements projected, and eventu- ally towns incorporated. The Northwest quarter of the district was incorporated as a district in 1753, and as the town of Hutchinson in 1774, the name being changed in 1776 to Barre. The West Wing became a precinct in 1759 and the town of Oakham in 1762. The Northeast quarter was incorporated as Hubbardston in 1767. The remainder with a portion of Leicester formed the district of Paxton incorporated in 1765. Proprietors' Records. The Records of the General Proprietors abruptly closed in 1770, the lands had all been disposed of, and the plans, papers and books were ordered to be committed to the keeping of the Hon. Moses Gill. The Early Period 31 Unfortunately the plans and papers are missing, but copies of the original surveys of their respective lands are on record in some of the towns above named. The settlement of the East Wing, so often contemplated but not yet accomplished, was again discussed by the proprietors in June, 1742, when a committee was requested to " Project a Method for Bringing forward settlements in the East Wing in concert with the neighboring farmes on the East Side thereof," but no report of the Committee appears on record or of any action relative thereto. There is some evidence tending to show that a few families were living in the East Wing near to Rutland line at this period. It is undoubtedly true that some of the lots, especially those owned by Rutland men, were under cultivation long before any dwellings were erected. These lands were reasonably accessible, although the roads must have been at certain seasons in a deplorable condition, even worse than when subsequently attacked by those calling themselves high- way surveyors. French War. The war declared by the French against Great Britain in 1744, known as the Old French War, continuing for four years, doubtless had its effect in retard- ing the settlement, as did also the French and Indian War in 1754. This last was a heavy burden upon the Province in men and means. But while the East Wing was still " on the market," awaiting the courageous settler or the removal of whatever obstacle was preventing the beginning and growth of a settlement, developments were taking place upon the North and East of this tract which indicated an early advance of the tiller of the soil. A large area of land lay between Lunenburg, Westminster, Leominster and Rut- land, much of it unappropriated, and none of it included within the bounds of any town.^ The survey and location 1 In 1714-15 the Committee for laying out the township of Rutland, were instructed to do so "as near as may be in a Square Figure, but withal contigu- ous to the Line of the Towns of Lancaster, Worcester and Leominster if it reached so far," but this was found impossible, as it would not cover the tract purchased of the natives. They were, therefore, obliged to locate the town and "leave a slip of land too small for a township." 32 History oj Princeton of quite a number of large tracts within this area granted by the Province tended towards early settlements thereon, and it appears that for a few years the new comers pre- ferred locating near Lancaster, probably on account of the greater facility for travelling and the procuring of Supplies. The action of the Rutland proprietors in 1742, referred to above, was doubtless occasioned particularly by the pro- posed movement of Mr. Wilder hereafter described, and by the frequent grants made by the General Court of Province Land. Leaving for the present the East Wing, let us look at the history of some of the " Farmes contigu- ous to the East Wing," which contains much of interest and valine and a record of the first settlers within the present limits of Princeton. A reference to the accompanying plan will make clear to the reader the location of the " Farmes " and the several grants hereafter described. The Early Period 33 Plan of the Farms as Traced out by Mr. Blake. I. Rutland East Wing. 14. Notown. 2. Hubbardston. 15- Muzzey's. 3. Hubbardston Annex. 16. Stevens'. 4. Westminster. 17- Potash. 5. Leominster. 18. Watertowa Farms. 6. Sterling. 19. Mayhew. 7. Rutland. 20. Allen's. 8. Stillriver. 21. Wilder's. 9- Allen's. 22. Brattle Farm. 10. Wachusett Mountain. 23- Blagrove. II. Kneeland's. 24. Loring Farm. 12. Drury's. 25- Hart well's Meadow 13- Willard's. CHAPTER III THE FARMS ADJOINING Province Grants. First in importance as to extent and value is the tract of 2000 acres known as, — Watertown Farms. The origin of the name and the occasion of the grant are clearly established. In 1637 the General Court granted to the town of Water- town " land to accommodate 50 or 60 families at the River that runs to Concord," but a controversy arose with the town of Sudbury concerning its location. The dispute was finally settled by the Court and the following order passed in May, 1651. " Its ordred by this Court that Watertowne shall haue two thousand accors of land layd out neere Assabeth River, joyninge to the bound of Sudbury, in respect of such land as was wantinge to them, which was graunted them formerly by this Court, to be the bound of their towne, & that Capt. VVillard & Lieut. Goodenow are appoynted to se this done & performed, & to make returne there of to this Court at theire next session, p'vided it be not p'judiciall to any former graunts." (Col. Record 3 : 235.) No return of this Committee appears on the records of the Court, and the location of the grant was evidently neglected for many years. The next mention of the subject on these records is in 1726, although it is probable that some previous attempts to secure the land were made by the town. At a meeting of the inhabitants of Watertown on the 14th of March 1725-6, it was " put to vote whether the Town will choose a Committee to Adress the great and General Court for a Sutable Track of Land to settle their young people on, and to endeavour the obtaining the former Grants which were made to Watertown that have not yett been Obtained, and the Vote past in ye Affirmative." 34 The Farms Adjoining 35 In December following a petition to the Court was presented by the towns of Watertown and Weston (the latter having- been originally within the bounds of the former town) reciting in substance the above facts and stating that " the grants have not yet been taken up or satisfied." " And forasmuch as the Inhabitants are much straightened as to land so that many of them have been obliged to remove out and settle in other places," they prayed that a grant of Province Land might be made for their relief. Not accomplishing their desire at this time another attempt was made in 1727, the Committee stating in their petition that " your petitioners have for many years past solicited your Honours even before the time of Limitation for settling Grants was expired, but have never yet been favored so far as to be allowed to survey the said additional Grant " and they " are once more Emboldened to lay their Case before your Honrs for your Wise and Just Considera- tion." The only result of this appeal was a reference to the next session. Not to be baffled, however, the towns in June, 1728, repeated their request and this time it was favorably considered and a grant of two thousand acres of Province Land was made to them. This appears to have been satis- factory to the towns and in October following a survey was made of a tract " joining to the Great Watchusett Hill," which was Confirmed by the General Court, Sept. 25, 1729. The bounds of this tract are given on the plan on file in the State Archives as follows: — " South Westerly by Rutland line, every other way by Province Land, beginning at Rutland line N. 39 W. 840 perch on Rutland line, East 39 North 86 perch East 4 North 140 perch under great Watchusett, North 40 East 160 perch. East 35 South 654 perch and South 35 West 600 perch to Rutland line." As Russell says the westerly line is " daintily deflected to exclude the mountain, and at the same time include all the valuable land at its base." This was not the only time 36 History of Princeton the mountain was " left out In the cold " by Surveyors, and it was only when the first minister of the district secured it by gift from the Province that it was considered worth much of anything. The accompanying plan ^ will give a general idea of the bound and location of this extensive tract, the western boundary of which extended more than two miles and a half. Several unsuccessful attempts were made by Watertown to find a purchaser for it. In 1756 the three towns Water- town, Weston and Waltham, each then having an interest in the tract, voted to sell it, and although no record of the sale appears on the Watertown records, among the town files, ^ however, is a report of a Committee dated the 12th of March, 1758, showing that they had been successful in disposing of it for £2005. (£802. Lawful money.) This sum was equally divided between the towns of Watertown, Weston and Waltham. This conveyance was made to Josiah Coolidge by deed, dated the 27th of October, 1756 (recorded Worcester deeds. Vol. 38, page 207), and signed by Jonathan Bemis and others acting doubtless as agents for the towns, although not so stated in the deed. Very likely Mr. Coolidge the purchaser was acting in behalf of what would now be called a syndicate, but whether so or not, he, within a very few years, conveyed the whole tract, or what appears to be the whole area, to nine individuals as follows: To John Samson 180 acres. Henry Spring, Jr 100 acres. Jeremiah Whittemore 264 acres. Benj. Brown 343 acres. Henry Gale 150 acres. John BuUard 190 acres. John Mirick 193 acres. Lemuel Jones 153 acres. Amos Spring 391 acres. 1 See page 33. The Farms Adjoining 37 making a total of 1964 acres. These parcels were after- wards in many cases subdivided among the first settlers of the district of Princeton. The whole tract appears to have been at some time surveyed and divided into lots, probably by direction of the above-named grantees, but we are not aware of any plans now in existence. After prolonged and persistent search through volumes of deeds recorded in Worcester Registry sufficient informa- tion was gained to enable the writer with the courteous suggestions of Albert C. Howe, Esq. (whose ancestor was early settled on lot number 14 still retained in the family), to determine the location of the " squadron lines " and make a plan of the whole which may be considered sub- stantially correct. The story of how the " Farms " became a part of Prince- ton is told elsewhere. Gardner's Farms. In endeavoring to trace the origin of the name of " Gardner's Farms " more time and labor have been expended than upon any other portion of this work and the results have been far less satisfactory. A careful examination of the public records proved fruit- less, and the search was several times abandoned, only to be again renewed, as some possible clue to the mystery presented itself. Finally a plan bearing date of 1733 was found in Worcester Registry of Deeds (Vol. 32, page 116) describing a tract of 900 acres unappropriated land situated in what is now Leominster, and upon this plan " Willard's Farm" heretofore described was designated as "Gardner's Farm." This farm as has been stated was granted to the heirs of Rev. Joseph Willard, upon petition of Rev. Andrew Gardner, and in this way appears to have acquired the name of "Gardner's Farm." The title, however, appears not to have been confined to that farm of 200 acres alone, but embraced tracts on the west and north, probably with- out any well-defined limits. A portion of this territory with lands adjoining acquired subsequently the name of No Town, as it was for many years unappropriated land. The Rev. Andrew Gardner, a graduate of Harvard 3& History of Princeton University 1712, was in 17 19 settled as the first minister of the town of Worcester. He was a very eccentric man and his habits occasioned great complaints among his parishioners; his " too ardent love for the chase of the deer and the sports of the hunter," combined with other objec- tionable characteristics, finally leading to a separation, from his church, not without a lawsuit to recover his salary which he considered due. As elsewhere stated he married the widow of Rev. Joseph Willard of Rutland, and subsequently settled at Turkey Hills (Lunenburg) where complaints similar to those at Worcester were made against him. Again taking up his staff he removed with his family to Number " 4 " (Charles- town, N. H.) and during the French and Indian war he was in the service of the Province as chaplain at Fort Dummer. It is possible that while at Worcester or Lunenburg he acquired by grant or purchase lands in Princeton, other than the Willard farm, but no record of such has been found. There was in this vicinity a large tract of "unappropri- ated " land of the Province and it is quite probable that some of it was quietly appropriated by settlers and a title acquired only by long occupancy, which may account for the absence of record evidence of their title. Without any attempt to locate exactly the several farms or estates in this section, which is probably impossible, it will suffice to mention some of the more prominent owners. In 1750 Daniel Driiry of Shrewsbury purchased of the Province for £14.5, 76 acres of land west of and adjoining the Willard farm of which he then owned a part (for plan see Mass. Archives, Vol. 46, pages 199-201). The next year the Willard and Drury farms were conveyed to Benjamin Wilson, who sold a portion to Da?iiel Gardner, Jr., as before stated. This latter portion is described as " Lying near a place called Crows Hill," (now in West- minster), and an island near the northerly end of Willard 's is named, both of which references may serve to locate the tract or farm to those familiar with that region. In 1757 Mr. Wilson with Moses Garfield built a saw The Farms Adjoining 39 mill, probably on or near the spot so long occupied for that purpose, now occupied by Osgood's Mill. In 1795 there was a grist or a saw mill there. There is evidence also of there being two houses in that vicinity in 1754-^ This was doubtless the first mill in the easterly part of the town. In a conveyance of a small lot of land with one-half of the saw mill, Oct. 21, 1757, by Mr. Wilson " of Gardner's farm near Watchusett Hill " to Mr. Garfield of the same place, it is provided that Mr. Wilson shall " have the priveledge of Laying Boards on a Little Knole or Ridge Hill Easterly from the place where said W^ilson and Gar- field are now Building a Saw Mill " and also the privilege of building a dam, etc. (Worcester Deeds, Vol. 39, page 536.) One of the brooks in this vicinity was designated as " Gardner's Brook." Among other owners of land in this vicinity were: Edward Wilson, Edward Joyner, William Joyner, Gardner Chandler, Abel Ray, Joshua Mosman, John Bowen, John Frost, some of them acquiring their titles subsequent to 1759- Edward Wilson (brother of Benjamin Wilson, above named) as early as 1760 owned a part of Kneeland and the Willard farms. In 1763 he, with Benjamin Houghton, petitioned the Court for indemnity on account of their bounds interfering and the land " falling short 45 acres," for which Mr. Houghton was allowed £24. Mr. Wilson also purchased of the State in 1781 for £20. in silver, 80 acres west of Drury's, extending to Westminster line, which was probably the 80 acre lot which the Province attempted to sell in 1762. His petition to the General Court in re- lation to this land is of some interest. 40 History of Princeton Commonwelth oj The Massachusetts To the Honble Sennitt and Hon^^^ House of Representatives in General Court assembled att Boston April y* lo**^ 1781. The petition of Edward Willson of Princeton Humbly Sheweth, — That there is about Eighty acres of unimproved Land Lieing partly in Princeton, and is unapropriated Land; & the property of the Commonwelth and your petitioner being under Verry Low Circumstances unable to purchase a farme to Live on haue Entered upon and made Some Improuement on said premises in hopes of Receiuing some proffit from the same: but have not as yet receieued any and your petitioner being Sensible that he is Lieable to be Considered as a Trespasser; yet However Relieth on the indulgence of the Hon^'e General Court and most Humbly Moues that he may be In- dulged with Liberty of purchaseing the same att the full value considered as in a State of Nature and as the Land can be of no possable seruice as it Lies to the pubhck: but if sold may mak Considerable Returns to the Commonwealth but if the Hon^^^ House should judge it in Expedient to Indulge your petitioner with the Land att priuet Saile: prays the Land may be sold att a publick vendue. With Reserue that your petitioner may have a Just and Reasonable allowance for his Labour out of the proceades theirof. And your petitioner as in Duty Bound shall Ever pray &c. Edward Wilson." In House May 8, 1781 — ordered a Committee to apprize and Sell to E. W. " In the condition in which it was before said Willison made any Im- provements thereon."' In 1765 he with Timothy Mossman (whose connection with the Potash farm is elsewhere noted) petitioned the General Court reciting that Wilson " bought 5 years since a tract called Willards farm of 250 acres, that the curveyor in laying it out took in 11 acres of Province land as part of that tract, being part of 105 acres lying between Nolands (Kneelands) farm & Gardners farm " that he, Wilson, has built his house on the said 11 acres — that Mossman was at charge of surveying the said 250 acres & both of them were in the last war. They therefore prayed for a grant of the 105 acre tract." 2 The House granted Wilson the eleven acres " where his house was built," but the Council nonconcurred and a second attempt resulted in a second denial. 'State Archives, Vol. 233, pages 30, 31. ' Court Records, 25, 423. The Farms Adjoining 41 John Frost subsequently took the eleven acre lot and John Bowen the 105 acres. Mr. Bowen desired to buy this of the Province in 1771 and Asa Whitcomb was instructed in 1773 to sell it — the eleven acres originally included in Kneelands farm " to be prized & if John Frost who lives on it does not want it " it was to be sold at auction. Mr. Whitcomb declared the land of no value and declined to put it up, but the next year it was sold, 103 acres to John Bowen, £1519, and 10 acres to John Frost for forty shillings. A plan of this land is found in Massachusetts Archives, Vol. 4, page 81. During the war of the Revolution Mr. Bowen was a sympathizer with the mother country, and with other Loyalists was obliged to leave the country and seek safety elsewhere. His land in Princeton was confiscated and sold, and the net proceeds, £258, turned in to the Province treasury. Benjamin Houghton was one of the largest real estate owners in the Province. In addition to the Wilder and Allen farms previously referred to, he purchased of the Province, in 1752, 329 acres on the northerly side of the Mountain, extending to and easterly of Kneeland's farm. The price paid for this was £42.6. To this he added by purchase of a portion of Kneeland's Farm and the conveyances to him on record are very many as are also the sales made by him. The land northeast of the Mountain he sold in small farm lots to various parties, Abel Ray, Jr., Tilly Littlejohn, and others (Littlejohn sold his house in 1790 to Ephraim Woolson). Blagrove's Farm. This farm (sometimes erroneously called Blackgrove's or Blagrow's) comprising one thousand or more acres, was situated in the southeasterly part of the town, extending from the northerly bound of the East Wing to Still River or Sterling bound. It derived its name from Nathaniel Blagrove of Bristol, R. I., and its history was discovered by me only after a long 42 History of Princeton and persistent search. For this history we must go back to the early days of the Colony. Capt. John Allen was a resident of Charlestown as early as the year 1639. He was a man of some prominence in that town, at one time a Deputy to the General Court, and his name frequently appears in the public records, especially in connection with his occupation as a ship- master. In the Records of Massachusetts Bay, Vol. V, page 427, appears the following under date of Nov. 7, 1668. " The Court, Understanding that Capt. John AUIn hath Severall times been imployed by order ffrom this Court, viz tenn dayes, to look after a French ship upon the coast, as also a voyage to Mounsieur De Aulnay, both himself and ship, for the space of neere twenty dayes besides a second voyage to the a foresaid D Aulnay wherein he was about sixe weekes, to w'^^ may be added his lending M*" Winslow, for the countrys vse, one hundred pounds in England w'''^ was not payd in seven yeares after, & then but in country pay: all w"*" considered the Court judgeth it meete, as a manifestation of their acceptance of such his good services, which hitherto hath not been tooke notice of, so as to render him any answerable recompense, to grant him a thousand acres of land where he cann finde it, according to law, so as to take it not vp in aboue two places." This was a rather tardy settlement of obligations in- curred some twenty to twenty-five years previously, but the poverty of the Colony may have been sufficient excuse for the delay. The possession of a boundless country afforded an easy method of cancelling its debts, in cases where the creditors were willing to take their pay in land. In reference to these services of Capt. Allen the Court records give several interesting items. In May 1645, Major Gibbons was ordered to send " two shallops furnished with men to goe for ye discouy of what he shipp y^ lyeth houring about these Coasts is, & whence," &c. and a committee was authorized to draw up The Farms Adjoining 43 a commission to Mr. Allen who doubtless had charge of the undertaking. In the same year appears this record (referring to a passport for a certain Capt. Bridge) " Capt. Rob* Bridge is imployed by this Courte to negotiate w*** Monsieur De Aulnay, Knight, left genne'' all for ye King of Fraunce, in ye prince of Acadye, on ye Speciall affaires of ye comis- sion'^ of ye Vnited Collonyes of New England, in a vessell of whereof Mr. Allen is M'' ", &c. There were two vessels besides Capt. Allen's employed in this expe- dition. In relation to the loan of money referred to by the Court in 1668 we have an interesting item. In a letter to Edward Winslow who was then (1649) in England, the Court acknowledges the receipt of a letter by the hands of Capt. Allen, regrets its inability to provide suitable allowance for him (Mr. Winslow) and adds " yett Shall wee hope by Gods assistance, faithfully dischardge and satisfy Mr. Allen or any other from whom you have receaved any moneyes in our behalf." And on the i8th of October, 1649 " Itt is ordered, that the Treasurer doe forthw*^'^ pay and satisfy M^ John Allen one hundred and thirty pounds, in the best and current pay that comes into the treasury out of this levye for his hundred pounds he paid M' Winslow." As the treasurer of the Colony received for the " Country levy " or taxes all kinds of grain and produce (the price of which was regulated by the Court, this year being " wheate, at hue shillings, barely at fine shillings six pense; pease & rye, four shillings; Indian corne three shillings ") vve can easily surmise that Capt. Allen would gladly have dis- counted his claim at a large percentage for coin. However, the settlement of the account was made in " country pay " as ordered, and nineteen years later the Court endeavored to adjust the matter with him, together with his other unsettled claims, by the grant of land above named, and this was the origin of the farm within Prince- ton bounds, known as Blagrove's farm. 44 History of Princeton Capt. Allen lived but a few years after the grant of the land was made him, and by his will in 1672-3 he gave to his wife, with his other estate " one thousand Acres of Land given by the Contrye " which she was to hold for the benefit of their children. Mrs. Allen survived her husband but a short time, her death occurring in 1675. One is inclined to think that Capt. Allen's right in the one thousand acres of Province Land, was forgotten by his heirs, for apparently nothing was done to secure it for more than fifty years after the Captain's decease. It was in the year 1727 that Thomas Church in behalf of himself and other heirs of Capt. Allen petitioned the General Court for the location and survey of this tract granted in November, 1668. This was ordered Dec. 9, 1727, and a plan presented the following June was accepted, and the grant confirmed. The bounds of this tract are so well defined on the plan in the Massachusetts archives (a copy of which is also in Worcester, Registry Deeds, Vol. 44, page 31) that there is now no difficulty in determining its location. Upon the same plan is a description of the " Hartwell farm " to which reference is elsewhere made in these pages. The river forming the easterly boundary of the tract now Still River is described on the plan as "a Rocky Stream of water being the Westerly Bounds of Lancaster New Grant." (Now Leominster.) The property thus confirmed to the heirs of Capt. Allen, appears to have passed into the possession of one of his daughters, Elizabeth, who married first Nathan Hayman, and second Nathaniel Blagrove. The latter was a man of some prominence in Bristol, R. L, where he was a judge of probate, and when he died in 1742, by his will he directed that the remains of his first wife, Elizabeth Allen, and those of her former husband, Nathan Hayman, be taken up " enclosed in one cofiin and buried in one grave." It is not evident why the name of Blagrove should have attached to the farm, but it was so designated as early as 1730. The title seems to have rested in the heirs of Eliza- The Farms Adjoining 45 beth (Allen) Blagrove, from her death until 1760, when there was a division of the property among them (Wor- cester Registry, Vol. 44, page 31). The parties then entitled to share the estate were Rev. William Brattle of Cambridge one-fourth, Rev. Israel Loring of Sudbury one- eighth. Dr. Zachariah Harvey of Princeton one-third, widow Alice Eunice one-eighth and Thomas Green one- sixth. Mr. Brattle and Mr. Loring had married daughters of Mrs. (Allen) Hayman, but the relationship of the other heirs has not been ascertained. Dr. Harvey probably acquired his share by purchases. Upon a resurvey of the farm it was found to contain 1 1 50 acres " neat measure." To Mr. Brattle was assigned 250 acres on the northerly side, and to Mr. Loring 125 acres on the easterly side. A little north of Mr. Loring's lot, and some 200 rods north of the present easterly corner of the town on Sterling bounds, there is shown on the plan a bridge across the river, and this is identical with the location of the present bridge on the County road. To Dr. Harvey was assigned the remainder of the tract, and having purchased the shares of Mr. Green and Mrs. Eunice, and being allowed 150 acres to make his proportion " as good in quality " as the others, he became the pro- prietor of 775 acres. The " Brattle farm " and " Loring farm " are often named on the early tax lists of the town. The Brattle farm was confiscated by the Government and sold in 1 78 1 for £281.10, silver money to William Putnam who the following year conveyed it to David Osgood. Having traced the history of the Blagrove farm from the year 1645 to 1760 it may be well to leave the subsequent divisions and transfers for the investigation of the present owners. Muzzy's Farm. Benjamin Muzzy of Sherborn in 1729 petitioned the General Court " stating that he was taken Prisoner by the Indians while he was a Soldier in service of the Province, and endured a long and cruel Captivity among them and narrowly escaped death, that the Wounds and other hard Usage he received from the Enemy has 46 History of Princeton occasioned much sickness since his Return and a charge to the Doctor, And therefore Praying for a Grant of Land or a Sum of money out of the Treasury in consideration of his Sufferings and Losses abouve mentioned." The original petition of Mr. Muzzy cannot be found, neither have any other facts concerning him been learned. For a number of years, at this period, the Court was very liberal in giving away the unappropriated lands of the Province, and this liberality only tended to increase the applications, which became very numerous and were based upon all sorts of real or imaginary claims. It was easier to satisfy these demands by gifts of land than of money, and the result of Mr. Muzzy's request was a grant of 200 acres. A tract on the north of " great Wachusett " was selected surveyed and confirmed in May, 1730, but in December following, for reasons not appearing on record, another tract east of Wachusett was substituted. Mr. Muzzy sold the farm on the 13th of June, 1749, for £400 Old Tenor to Robert Keyes of Shrewsbury who with his family settled there in May, 1751, and this was the farm where he was living when he lost his little child, to which event reference is made elsewhere. Potash Farm. The history of this large tract of land of 1500 or more acres, dating back to the year 1735, is of no little interest. For many years the subject of the manufacture of potash in this country had occupied the attention of merchants, and the General Court of this province had offered many inducements to accomplish the desired object, not only to meet the limited demand here, but also with the expecta- tion of exporting to England in large quantities. The abundance of wood in the province seemed to offer en- couragement for its manufacture, and some attempts were made, considerable quantities being produced in Ashburn- ham, Leominster, Rutland and other towns, but probably only a small amount was ever manufactured within the limits of Princeton. The various petitions and papers relating to this industry, The Farms Adjoining 47 on file in the Massachusetts Archives, are full of interest, but this sketch must be confined to one project only. Thomas Plaisted, a merchant of Boston presented to the General Court, Dec. 29, 1735, a petition the substance of which is given in the Court records (the original is not to be found.) " A petition of Thomas Plaisted late of London now of Boston Merch* Showing that he is well acquainted with the Mystery of making Potash which he apprehends may be carried on to a good advantage in this Province. Propos- ing to treat with a Committee of this Court & Praying that some suitable Persons may be accordingly appointed to receive & consider what he has to offer on that head, & make report thereof to the Court. In the House of Representatives Read & Ordered that Joseph Gerrlsh " John Choat Esq^ Mr. Prout, Coll Brown, M"" Thomas Cushing, John Alden & Nahum Ward Esq"", Mr. Milbury, & Mr. Ingersol with such as the Hon^'^ Board shall join be a Committee to take this Petition under consideration and report their Opinion what may be proper for the Court to do for the encouragement of the Petltlon*^ in carrying on the Manufacture of Potash within this Province as within mentioned." " In Council, Read & Concur'd And Edmund Quincy, Samuel Thaxter, William Dudley, Ebenezer Burrill & Isaac Lothrop Esq'' are joined in the Affair." (Vol. XVI, page 248.) The report of this Committee with the action thereon is of sufficient interest to give in full. Jan. 12, 1735-6. " Edmund Quincy Esq'" from the Committee on the Peti- tion of Thomas Plaisted gave in the following Report: viz. '* In obedience to the Order of this Court appointing a Committee to consider of the Petition of Mr. Thomas Plaisted &c. We having met & discoursed fully with the Petition*^ & received from him more particulars and Pro- posals in writing, herewith exhibited, referring to the carry- ing on the Manufacture of Potash within this Province, Are 48 History oj Princeton of Opinion that for Encouragement of the Petition'' in an Undertaking so much for the service of Great Britian as well as advantage to this Countrey, There be granted Fifteen hundred acres of Land in some suitable place, within forty or fifty miles of the Town of Boston, unto some proper Person or Persons that this Court shall appoint to be holden by him or them in trust & for the use of the said Thomas Plaisted the Petioner, for the space of three years; & that there be also advanced & paid him out of the public Treasury the sum of Eight hundred Pounds to be by him repaid together with the value or price of the said fifteen hundred acres of Land at a moderate rate & apprizement at the expiration of the term of three years as aforesaid; For the payment of which sums the Petition^ shall be obliged to find sufftcient security as also for his the said Plaisteds making at least thirty Tuns of Potash & sending the same to London according to the proposals above mentioned; & that the said Manufacture shall be openly & publickly carried on so that whoever shall labor therein shall be made capable of manufacturing it them- selves; & further that in order to his finding out a suitable Tract of Land as aforesaid some meet Person or Persons that are well acquainted with the unappropriated Lands, be appointed as soon as the season of the year will admit thereof, & at the charge of the Government to assist the Petition'' in finding out & surveying the said fifteen hundred Acres in order to its being granted & confirmed in trust as aforesaid: and further we are humbly of opinion that if the Petition'' efifect his design of introducing & carrying on the said Manufacture to the advantage of the Province, as he hath proposed, It will be proper to make the said Grant of fifteen hundred Acres an absolute Estate, in the Petition*^ & his Heirs, & that he be further rewarded for such his good service to this country by an adequate generous Grant or Allowance of this Government. All which is humbly submitted. By order of the Committee, Edm^ Quincy." The Farms Adjoining 49 In the House of Representatives Read & Ordered that this Report be accepted : In Council: Read & Concur'd: & Joseph Wilder is ap- pointed to assist in finding one & surveying the Lands within mentioned: & in taking said survey, that he care- fully view & consider the Quality of the Land, & return, with the Plat, his Opinion of the value thereof at the same time. In the House of Represent""^ Read & Concur'd. Consented to J. Belcher. The restrictions placed upon the loan and the conditions of the grant proved to be judicious in the light of subsequent events. One tract of land containing 1500 acres adjoining Water- town farms was selected and surveyed and on the first of July, 1736, was confirmed to Mr. Plaisted. It would seem that the wooded lands in that vicinity must have been of more vigorous growth than in later years to induce Mr. Plaisted to accept this tract for his experiments in manufacturing potash. No plan of this tract has been found, and it is now impossible to make one that is accurate, as the lines and courses are not well defined. This is immaterial however, as a subsequent survey proved that the original grant encroached upon one of earlier date. The location of the farm is indicated on the accompanying plan. The most southerly portion was added to make up for that which was lost on the northerly side by interference with an earlier grant. If the recorded measurements are followed exactly, a portion of the farm would possibly lie in Leominster, but there is evidently an error in the length of the line, which perhaps should read 200 instead of 280 rods. A few months later Mr. Plaisted desired an understand- ing about the payment of the proposed loan, and also asked that the limit of three years time, within which he was to 50 History of Princeton commence the manufacture of potash, be reckoned from his receipt of the mojtey and not from the date of the grant. The latter was conceded, but it is probable that he never received any funds from the Province treasury, nor had occasion to call for them, on account of the successful operation of his venture. If tradition may be relied upon, he commenced the manufacture of potash somewhere within the limits of the farm, but soon abandoned it, and the history of his experi- ments, the extent of his investment, and the cause of his failure to make a merchantable article are hidden in the past. He remained in the vicinity evidently for ten years at least, as in 1738 he purchased " Mayhew's Farm " adjoining, but nothing more is known of him or his move- ments in Boston or elsewhere, nor the time and place of his death. It is only known that Mr. Plaisted failed to perform his agreements with the Government and in 1759 the Court ordered William Richardson, Esq., to take possession of the farm in the name of the Province, which was promptly done. Acting under direction of the Court, he reported in April, 1760, that he had leased the farm to Timothy Mossman, for one year, for the sum of six pounds. The lease was renewed the following year. It may be surmised that but little, if any, of the land was under cultivation, yet this rental value (six pounds ster- ling) for fifteen hundred acres may be an interesting item for the present proprietors and residents of the village of East Princeton and its surrounding farms, formerly in- cluded within the bounds of " Old Potash." As early as 1754 there were two dwelling houses in the northerly part of this farm, but the occupants are unknown, although it is presumed that they were of the Mossman family. Mr. Timothy Mossman, Senior, had been living on the farm previous to his lease from the Province, as appears by his petition to the Court in 1764, of which an abstract is given. " Your petitioner Lived at Dorchester Canada (Ash- The Farms Adjoining 51 burnham) and was drove off by the Indians, from that Town, and thereby I Lose'd my House, moveables, and Implements, and being impoverish'd sold my Lands there, I was put in possession of the Pottash farm by virtue of a Lease from Capt. Plaisted, where I did much Labour, in fencing improveing & makeing roads to the value of Two Hundred Pounds where also I met with Great sickness in my person & family and was further reduced by the Loss of the Possession of the Province Land as it became profitable." * He asked that his indebtedness of £12. to the Province might be " forgiven " and also for a grant of a small tract of Province land between Westminster and Leominster " that is useless to the Government " or for the sum of £200. The Court cancelled the debt but refused to give him either land or money. This small indebtedness very likely represented two years unpaid rent of Potash farm. Mr. Mossman had formerly lived at Sudbury, where he had brought up a large family. As he was one of the early settlers of Princeton, it may not be out of place to insert here another petition of his, dated May 6, 1760. " The petition of Timothy Mossman of Princetown So Called in the County of Worcester Humbley shewing To your Hono'': & Honours that his son Samuel Mossman was an Inlisted Soulger in the Seruis of the Gouernment in the Expedition against Canada in year 1759 under the Comand of Capt. Colt and in CoUoncl Abijah Wil- lards Rcgement and so it was that my Said Son was a grate part of the Sumer So much Indisposed that it Cost him Eightie pounds of his wages to get Nesecareys for his Comfort and some short time before the army was Dismissed he being so Verey weke and Low obtained Leue to Come home and was brought in a wagon to Albaney and he much Dificultey got ouer to Grenbush and was put into a barn where he Lay in a most Dredful Con- djton None aboute him Expecting his Life: one of his acquaintance Sending me word of my Said Sons Case I Imedetley send a man & horse vp to said Grenbush for his Relif and when he the Said man ariued at Grenbush he found my Son so Verry weke & Poor that he was obhged to tarey Some Days before he Dare \'enture to Set out with him & after he set out they came but thre miles the first Day and with the Gratest Dificultey after be- *Mass. Archives, Vol. XLVI, page 485. 52 History of Princeton ing done 19 Days got home for which time and horse and Expences of Said man I payed 29 Dollars as pr account here with Exhibeted may apper be- sides all winter after being sik which surcumstances I would Humbley besech your Hono"" and Honours to take into your Compashonate Consideration and alow him said 29 Doolers which he actuley payed as aforesaid and make him shuch further allowance for his Loss of time and Sickness Since he Came home as you in your Grate wisdom and goodness Shall Judge proper as in Duty Bound Do Pray Timothy Mossmann."* The thought of a man as sick as the one Mr. Mossman describes brought from Greenbush, N. Y., to Princeton on horseback, over the rough roads of a century ago, appeals very strongly to our " Compashonate Considera- tion," and it doubtless had its effect upon the Magistrates for the sum of £3.54 was ordered to be paid Wm. Richard- son, Esq., for the petitioner. Mr. Mossman and his sons subsequently owned land in Princeton, reference to which is made elsewhere in these pages. In July, 1 761, the authorities were notified of encroach- ments upon the farm as follows: — " Since possession of said farm was taken by Wm. Richardson, Esq., appointed by the General Court in behalf of the Province, the proprietors of said Lancaster have laid out into Lots above two hundred & fifty acres of the Southerly part of said Tract of Province Land, and have cut and destroyed the Timber thereon, also the Tim- ber on other parts of said Land whereby considerable part of said fifteen hundred acres of Land is likely to be lost unless speedily prevented." (Court Records, Vol. XXIV, page 92.) An investigation was ordered and the following report made Feb. 9, 1762 (Mass. Archives, Vol. 46, page 452), through Ezra Taylor, one of the Committee. " On the 29th day of Last September I Repaired to said Farm with a Surveyor and Chainman, and have run the Lines Search*^ up and Renewed the Bounds all Round said Farm And I find that in the originall Laying out of 1 Mass. Archives, Vol. LXXIX, page 151. The Farms Adjoining 53 said Farm It was Run on upon a Prior Grant made to one Mr. Gardnier which will Take sixty four acres of said Farm. I allso find that the most valuable part of the Timber on said Farm is Cut of and appears to have been Cheifly Done within Two years Last past and I Cant find out any Person who has done it Except one Timothy Mossman, who was then in Possession of said Pottash farm (as he says) by Virtue of a Lease From William Richardson, Esq'^ as Agent for the Government and was allowed by him to Cut the Timber afore said, Supposeing it was on Land formerly called Mayhews Farms and not on Province Land. And as to the Lotts which has been Laid out by the proprietors of Lancaster in said Province Land, it plainly appears To have been done without the Least Colour of Right for so doing: But without Doubt have gone upon the supposition that the originall plans & bounds were Lost and that they might Hold the Land by Takeing Possession thereof." ^ Mr. Taylor reported the expense of this survey Expenses of Surveyor and Chainman, 3 days 23.9 Expense myself and horse, 3 days 18.0 31-9 which sum was allowed by the Court. What " Colour of Right " either Mr. Richardson or Mr. Mosman had to the timber on Mayhem's farm does not appear, although Mr. Plaisted who had purchased the latter farm in 1738 may possibly have leased or sold it to Mr. Mosman. (See Mayhews farm.) The report of the Committee, as given above, resulted in an order Feb. 11, 1762, authorizing the sale of the farm with other Province land, all described as follows, — " 1430 acres partly in Princetown called the Potash farm, 502 acres in Princetown commonly called Great Watchusett, 80 acres lying west of Potash farm." The sale was to take place in Boston, the Potash farm ' Mass. Archives, Vol. XLVI, page 452. 54 History of Princeton "to be set up at not less than £500." Wachusett "at not less than £50., and the 80 acre lot at not less than £10." the purchaser " to have i year to pay the purchase money upon good security without interest." An advertisement appears in the Boston Evening Post, May loth, 17th, 24th, 1762, announcing the sale of these lands on " Thursday the Third Day of June next, at Three o'clock Afternoon, at the Royal Exchange Tavern in King Street," and in February, 1763, the following report was presented to the General Court. " The Committee appointed to make Sale of Certain Lands lying in the County of Worcester have Attended that Service, and made Sale of the same in the manner following viz* The Potash Farm so-called sold to John Scott Merchant in Boston for 670 . Watchusett Hill Sold to said Scott for 65. Also Eighty acres lying West of the Potash Farm sold to said Scott for 12.10 "Received Earnest for the Potash Farm 10. Received d° for Watchusett Hill 5 . Received d° for Eighty Acres above mentioned 3 . 18. To Cash paid Cap Stone for Expenses for house room etc. at the time of sale 1.4 16.16 The ballance of the Cash received as Earnest for the above mentioned Lands being Sixteen pounds Sixteen Shillings your Committee have paid into the Province Treasury, and taken his Receipt for the same. Your Committee beg leave further to report that no deed has as yet been given of said Lands or Bonds taken for the money; the reason is that the Bounds of said Lands were not properly Ascertained : Your Committee therefore pray the further direction of the Court in the Affair: All of which is humbly submitted pr order John Choate." ^ 1 Court Records, Vol. XXIV, page 563. The Farms Adjoining 55 The Court ordered a new survey of the lands, but the sale to Mr. Scott amounted to nothing, no deed being given him, and nothing more is known of him in connection therewith, although in a few deeds the tract is referred to as " Mr. Scott's land." Mr. Scott was a Brazier of Boston, and had, subsequently, business transactions with Hon. Moses Gill. The farm appears to have been an unprofitable and troublesome piece of property for the province, on account of the failure of Mr. Plaisted's schemes, the encroachments of Lancaster people and others, the loss of rental, and the unsuccessful bargain with Mr. Scott. If, however, the place could not be sold, it could be given away, which perhaps was the best plan to prevent further annoyance, and this method was adopted in 1764 by resolve of the General Court, as follows: In the House of Representatives Jan'ry 26th, 1764. Resolved that the Tract of Land belonging to this Province Called the Potash farm Lying in Princetown District in the County of Worcester Bounded as foUoweth (vz) Easterly on Lancaster and Leominster, being at the South East Corner, being a Corner of a farm Called Britmans farm (written " Brightmores " in another record, but undoubtedly should be " Blagroves ") at a Heap of Stones, thence East 10 Degrees north 20 Rods to a great Rock in the Brook, Thence vp the said Brook one Hundred and thirty Rods to a Birch Tree on the Bank of the Brook, Thence North 19 Degrees west 274 Rods to a Heap of Stones Called the Squaw Cap, thence North 33 Degrees East 280 Rods to a Heap of stones, thence West 34 Degrees north 360 Rods to a pine Tree, thence west 9 Degrees north 31 Rods to a Heap of Stones, at a Line of a farm Laid out to the Heirs of the Rev*^ Mr. Joseph Willard, thence South 5 Degrees East 69 Rods to a Heap of stones, a corner of said farm, thence west five Degrees south 170 Rods to a Heap of stones. Being the south west Corner of said farm, thence west 7 Degrees north 52 Rods to a Heap of Stones, thence south 27 Degrees East 102 Rods to a Chesnut Tree 56 History of Princeton Being a Corner of a farm Laid out to Capt. Joseph Stevens, thence South by said farm 170 Rods to a Heap of stones, at Meahews farm (so called) thence south 56 Degrees East by said Meahews farm 330 Rods to a Black oak Tree, thence south 34 Degrees west 94 Rods to a Heap of Stones, thence Eastwardly 4 Rods to a Heape of stones, thence south 34 Degrees west 322 Rods to a Heap of stones, vpon the Line of Watertown farm, thence East 3 Degrees north 350 Rods to the Corner first mentioned — be and is Hereby granted to the Honble Timothy Ruggles Esq' his Heirs and assigns, for Ever, in Testimony of the greatfull sence this Court has of the Important services the grantee Rendered his Country Dureing the Late war more par- ticularly while Commander in Chief of the Troops of this Province furnished for the Reduction of Canada. Provided that the grantee or his Heirs pay their Propor- tion of a Tax of Two pence pr acre for Three years. Laid by the Generall Court at their Sessions in Janry 1760, vpon all the vnimproved Lands in the District of Prince- town. Sent vp for concurrence Tim° Ruggles Spk^ In Council Jan. 26, 1764. Read and Concurred A. Oliver Sec. Consented to Era Bernard ^ Gen. Ruggles, long a resident of Hardwick was dis- tinguished not only in military but in civil life. It is stated that he " possessed powers of mind of a very high order," that as a lawyer he was an impressive pleader and in debate able and ingenious." He attained high positions of honor and influence was chosen president of the Council, and at the time of the passage of the above resolve was Speaker of the House. * Court Records, Vol. 46, page 468. The Farms Adjoining 57 His sympathies, however, were soon cast with the Loyal- ists, and at the evacuation of Boston in 1776, he accom- panied the royal troops to Halifax. His large estate was confiscated by the Government in 1779 and sold. From an account rendered in 1780, it appears that the sales of his real estate in Hardwick and Princeton amounted to £31,890. " Lawful money " (£1292.1.6 " Hard money") of this sum £5460. was received for about 600 acres of the Potash farm conveyed by deed Jan. 3, 1780 to David Osgood. Gen. Ruggles had disposed of the larger portion of the farm in 1772 — to Elisha Gale 176 acres, to John Bowen 42 acres, to Joshua Sponer 550 acres, and to Nathan Billings 150 acres. Mr. Osgood, within a few years of his purchase, disposed of a considerable portion of the land to Messrs. Raymore, Richardson, Gale, Geary and others. The whole territory is now subdivided into many thrifty farms, with the enterprising village of East Princeton and its various industries, but the name of " Potash farm " " Old Potash " and " Ruggles farm " are unfamiliar to the great majority of the inhabitants. This somewhat extended account, probably embraces all the important facts that can be obtained concerning this once well-known locality. Since writing the above the following items have been found. It appears from depositions recorded with Worcester deeds that in 1764 Mr. Ruggles desired to perfect his title to this property and these fortunately give us some idea of the success of Mr. Plaisted's scheme. John Snow made oath that he had lived for thirty years in Lancaster addi- tional grant " and often laboured for one Francis Parker ye overseer or Pretended Artis for making Potash for one Capt. Thomas Plaisted. I never saw nor heard of but about three Quarters of a Hogshead of Potash that said Parker or any under him said Plaisted made on or about said Potash Farm so called, and said Parker Brought three Quarters of a Hogshead of Potash by my house it being the 58 History of Princeton main road from said Potash Farm to Boston for Transpor- tation and said Parker shew it to me at my Door and that it appeared to me to be of a much Inferior QuaHty to what has been made in Lancaster and elsewhere since, that has taken a good market in England as I have been informed." Reuben Rugg, who lived on " the only cart road from Plaisted's farm to Boston; said that it looked more like the Cinder from a Blacksmiths fire than Potash " and Phineas Willard gave similar testimony. Wm. Richardson, Esq., declared that he understood from Capt. Plaisted's remarks that he never intended to fulfill his contract as to making Potash, but that he did intend to hold the lands. ^ William Richardson, Esq., of Lancaster testified " 20 odd years ago & after the Great & General Court had granted 1500 acres to Capt. T. Plaisted upon certain conditions, Since known as Potash farm and now in Prince- town district — William Richardson kept a public house in Lancaster & ye ad Thomas Plaisted was often at his House & when speaking about ye Conditions of ad Grant & in particular about eight hundred Pounds that the Government was to lend him for some Time in Conversa- tion ad Plaisted declared that he had been to ye Province Treasurer for ye money but at that Time ye Treasurer could not attend upon him & told him he must call again, & ye s'd Plaisted said he never went again & in so doing he had nicked ye Province, by which ye ad William ye Depot from ad Declaration of ye ad Plaisted understood that he intended to hold ad Lands without fulfilling the Conditions of the Grant, & Mr Richardson appointed to take possession of the land & did so & leased it for 2 years & received the rent. Feb. 7, 1764, by request of Timothy Ruggles."^ Mayhew's Farm. This tract was on the northerly side of Watertown farm, adjoining Capt. Stevens' and the Potash farms. 1 Worcester Deeds, Vol. XLIX, pages 256 and 484. * Worcester Registry Deeds, Vol. XLIX, page 256. The Farms Adjoining 59 A petition was presented to the General Court, Dec. 30, 1730, by " IMr. Experience Mahew of Marthas Vineyard Clerk Setting forth his great Labours, & Services in con- verting the Indians to Christianity, & the disadvantages accruing to his own private Estate in attending that work and praying from this Court a Grant of some of the un- appropriated Lands of this Province in consideration of his said Services." (C. R., Vol. 15, page no.) Unfortunately the original petition of Mr. Mayhew is missing from among the State papers (as are many others referred to in these pages). But the substance of the petition as given in the records of the General Court explains the basis of Mr. Mayhew's claim upon the gener- osity of the Province. He was then a minister of the Gospel among the Indians at Martha's Vineyard, as were his father, grandfather, and great-grandfather before him, and his own son after him, making in all a service of one hundred and sixty years in preaching to the Indians by the " five venerable Mayhews." Rev. Experience Mayhew himself was engaged in this work for sixty four years, being at the time of his death, in 1758, 85 years old. He was specially fitted for this service, having been familiar with the Indian language from his infancy. Rev. Thomas Prince said of him " he has been all along accounted one of the greatest masters of it (the language) that hath been known among us." He made a version of the Psalms and of the Gospel of John, and published also an account of the religious work among the Indian tribes of the Vineyard. The reasonableness of his request was recognized by the Court and a tract of 200 acres of Province land was granted to him. A survey was made of land " one mile to the eastward of the great Wachusett Hill," adjoining Water- town Farm, and a plan thereof presented to the Court and confirmed in June, 1731. Mr. Mayhew sold the farm in 1738 for £125. to Thomas Plaisted, who, at that time was in possession of the adjoining Potash farm. 6o History of Princeton Mr. Plaisted is said to have leased it to Mr. Mossman and very likely sold it to him but there is no record of any transfer by Mr. Plaisted, Mr. Mossman, or any one else. In 1776 it appears to have been in the possession of the Mossman family, Timothy Jr., selling at that time to Stephen Harrington forty acres described as " a part of Mayhew's farm " and Abel, Joshua & Samuel Mosman, brothers of Timothy Junior, also owned land adjoining, from which it may be inferred that the father in some way obtained possession of the farm and it was divided among the sons. The name of " Mayhew's farm " was retained for many years in descriptions of this tract. The outline can readily be defined today, Allen's Farms. These were the property of Rev. Benj. Allen of Bridgewater. In a petition to the General Court in 1730 he set forth, as recorded in the Court Journal (the original petition is lost) that " he supported for many years in his house & at con- siderable charge Ruth Nusuck an Indian Squaw being old and sickly — in requital for which she conveyed to him by deed a tract of land 5 miles long & 3 miles broad, lying to the northward of Brookfield, most of which tract as the petitioner is informed is taken up by Grants of the Court & praying for an equivalent of land or otherwise relieved." (C. R., Vol. 14, page 354, 463; Vol. 15, page 34.) In response the Court in July, 1730, granted him 200 acres of Province land, which in September following was increased by another grant of the same quantity making 400 acres in all. Surveys were made and plans of the two tracts of land are preserved. One of these, often referred to in the town and other records as the Allen farm, embraced 229 acres lying westerly of the Watertown farms and Southwesterly of Wachusett hill. The second piece containing 171 acres was in the South- easterly part of the town between Watertown and Blagrove farms. The Farms Adjoining 6l Mr. Allen was a native of Tisbury, graduated at Yale College 1708 and was ordained in 17 18 at Bridgewater where he was pastor ten or twelve years, but " being an unsuccessful manager of his secular concerns, he Jell into debt, and the parish after often relieving him became at last weary of it, and he was dismissed by an ecclesiastical council." He was subsequently settled at Cape Elizabeth, Me., where he died, in 1754, at the age of 65. While at the latter place, he sold, Jan. 5, i736-7» the smaller of the two farms (stated as containing 169 acres) for £130. current money to Benjamin Houghton. (Mr. Houghton appears to have had some years after controversy concerning the boundaries of his farm with Joshua Wilder who owned land adjoining.) The larger tract near the Watertown farm Mr. Allen sold in 1739 (then 231 acres) to Epes Sargent of Gloucester for £150. thus realizing from the entire grant the sum of £280. which it is hoped enabled him to keep out of debt. The last named farm was conveyed in 1771 for £230. to Rev. Timothy Fuller who already owned 500 acres adjoin- ing on the north, including Wachusett hill. Willard's Farm. The Rev. Joseph Willard a graduate of Harvard College in 17 15 was invited by the inhabitants of Rutland in 1721 to settle with them as their minister. He was then about twenty-one years old, and this was his first pastorate. The young man found the place not so pleasant as he probably anticipated and was disheartened as seen by his letter, a copy of which is recorded on the book of the Pro- prietors of Rutland under date of October 19, 1722. He refers to the call of the town and adds " after serious con- sideration and humble addresses to heaven for direction I did accept, and accordingly began my building but have not been able to go on with it by reason of the people's backwardness and neglect of helping it forward by their work as they might have done, which, as also the removal of nigh or about two-thirds of the inhabitants out of the 62 History of Princeton town, has Discoraged me from any further attempt towards building, and with the Concurance of several other things have altered my thoughts of settleing among you. I have therefore (Eying the Divine providence therein) thought it my duty to acquaint you with my purpose and design speedily to Remoue from you and desire you to Communicate this to the Inhabitants that they may timely seek out for some other person to labour in the work of the ministry among them." The situation of the settlers in Rutland at this time was truly very discouraging and even serious, as they were living in constant fear of sudden incursions of the Indians whose ravages were causing consternation among the various settlements on the frontier. With the assistance of the Government preparations were made to repel any attacks of the enemy, garrisons were established, scouts sent out to watch for the enemy, and a fort was ordered to be built about Mr. Willard's house. (A portion of this house was standing in 1885 in Rutland.) Notwithstanding this distressing condition of affairs Mr. Willard withdrew his resignation and in the fall of 1723 preparations were made for his installation as pastor of the church. By August of that year, however, fear of the savages had so alarmed the inhabitants that out of some seventy-five families not over fifteen remained in the town. A few of these returned after peace was restored, but as late as 1727 there were only twenty-five families in the town, and the settlement was so retarded by these troubles that it was many years before much progress was made. Note. In a petition to the General Court by Simon Davis in behalf of the town in 1727, he says, referring to the time of Mr. Willard's death,' "it being a time of warr, many of the Inhabitants of the s,^ Town (who were in number Sixty Families then Setled) drew off and left their habitations, so that there were not above Fifteen Families remaining. But after ye peace with the Indians was concluded, several of them returned again, and are now grown to the number of Twenty Five Families or thereabout." ' Mass. Archives, Vol. 113, page 732. The Farms Adjoining 63 Mr. Willard's change of purpose and willingness to remain in the town, cost him his Hfe, for on tiie 14th of August, 1723, he was attacked and killed by the Indians. His proposal ten months before " speedily to Remove " from the town must have seemed to his neighbors as almost prophetic. Concerning this sad ending of his life, it is related that vv^hile away from his house on a hunting excursion, he was suddenly attacked by two Indians who fired upon him. He returned the fire, wounding one of them, upon which the second closed in with him, and with the assistance of three others who had appeared on the scene killed him. Removing his scalp and taking some of his clothing they escaped. In a letter from Lieutenant Governor Dummer to Monsieur Vandreuil, Governor of Canada, January 19, 1724, in Massachusetts Archives, Vol. 50, page 106 (re- ferring to the alleged murder of Father Ralle, a Jesuit teacher) he says: " And I think I have much greater cause to complain that Mr. Willard the Minister of Rutland (who never had been guilty of the Facts chargeable upon Mr. Ralle) was by the Indians you sent to attack that Town, assaulted. Slain & Scalped & his Scalp carried in triumph to Quebec." Some time after Mr. Willard's death, his widow married Rev. Andrew Gardner into whose family her two children William and Joseph were received. Mr. Gardner was set- tled at Lunenburg, but subsequently removed to Charles- town, N. H. Further reference to him will be found under the article on " Gardner's Farms." It is interesting to note that one of Mrs. Willard's sons, Joseph, was in 1760 with his wife and five children taken captive by the Indians. The youngest child was killed and the rest of the family carried to Canada where they remained until the surrender of Montreal, when they were released. In 1729 Mr. Gardner in behalf of the children of Rev. Joseph Willard petitioned the General Court for a grant of Province land, stating that Mr. Willard was killed by the Indians in the late war and in defending his own 64 History of Princeton life " did in all probability kill one or more of said Indians." The Court made a grant of 300 acres of unappropriated land in answer to this petition and a survey of a lot " West from Lancaster Additional grant & East from Wachusett," bounded " all about by common land " was confirmed Dec. 19, 1730. (Mass. Archives, Vol. 14, page 348.) Only a portion of this grant was included within the original limits of Princeton, the northerly portion belong- ing to that tract being known for many years as part of " No-Town." It retained the name of " Willard's farm " for years, but in some instances was called " Gardner's farm," to which reference is made hereafter. In 1 75 1 Daniel Drury of Shrewsbury and Benjamin Willard of " Potash " for £300. Lawful money conveyed this tract with an adjoining lot of 76 acres to Benjamin Wilson, who soon sold a part of it to Daniel Garfield, Jr., and somewhere within this territory a saw mill was erected, being the first one in that neighborhood of which we have any record. The history of the occupancy of these lands is so inter- woven with other adjoining tracts, that all are included in the article on Gardner's farm. Kneeland's Farm. This farm, occasionally referred to as " Nolands " was situated in what is now the northerly part of the town, adjoining Westminster including within its bounds a portion of Wachusett pond. It is difficult to determine the exact location, but its northerly corner was about fifty rods north of the pond on Westminster line, very near the old corner bound of the town before " No town " was annexed. Samuel Kneeland was a resident of Boston, for many years was printer for the General Court, and was also interested in the publication of many books and of one or more newspapers of his day. This " ancient and respect- able printer " bore an excellent reputation and was a useful citizen, " sustaining to the end the character of an upright The Farms Adjoining 65 man & good Christian." His death occurred, Dec. 14, 1769, at the age of 73. His partner, Bartholamew Green was the recipient of lands from the Government, and in 1734 Mr. Kneeland petitioned the General Court in his own behalf, praying for a grant of Province lands for the reasons set forth, — that he has officiated as Clerk of the Narragansett Com- pany and has spent much time & labour in that Service, whereby he has not only served the Said Company, but eased the Committees of the General Court of a great deal of trouble in finding out mistakes in the Lists & rectifying them: for which he has not received any satis- faction." The House of Representatives favored the petition but the Council refused its sanction: though a few months later, April 16, 1735, a grant of 250 acres was made, and upon presentation of a plan the lot as described above was confirmed on the 20th of December, 1735. (C. R., Vol. 20, pages 115, 238 — Plans Vol. In 1737 Mr. Kneeland mortgaged the farm and in 1740 sold it to Samuel Hewes of Boston for £200. In 1759, at which time there were buildings upon the lot, Mr. Hewes conveyed it to Edward Wilson (to whose possessions reference is elsewhere made) who in turn conveyed to Benj. Houghton 45 acres, David Osgood, Jr., 102 acres, and John Frost 107 acres. Subsequently a large portion of the farm came into possession of the Everett family. Stevens' Farm. The facts connected with the history of this farm are full of interest. Capt. Joseph Stevens removed from Sudbury about the year 1720 to Rutland, where he became prominent in town affairs, was deacon of the church, ensign and captain in the militia, and innholder, and in every way was accounted a worthy man. The severe losses he sustained in his family by reason of the Indian invasion have been related in several publica- tions, but we are indebted to the historian of Charlestown, 66 History of Princeton N. H., where one of Mr. Stevens' sons subsequently settled, for the most satisfactory account. On the 14th of August, 1723 (the same day In which Rev. Mr. Willard was killed, as elsewhere related), Capt. Stevens was making hay in the " meeting house meadow," and as his four sons were going to join him, they were surrounded by five Indians, who immediately slew two of them, and took Phineas, the eldest, and Isaac the youngest, prisoners. The father saw the transaction, but knowing that he was powerless to resist made his escape into neighboring bushes. Isaac was only about four years old, and the savages soon manifested their intention of killing him, but Phineas, then some seventeen years of age, quickly apprehending their design, succeeded in making them understand that if they would spare the child he would relieve them of all trouble in relation to him by carrying him on his back. The boy was spared and the brother fulfilled his agreement and carried him through the whole journey to Canada. The children were held in captivity for over a year, and were released only after persistent efforts of the father and at great expense. Two journeys to Canada were made by him and that was no easy task in those days. Upon the first visit he succeeded in securing one of the boys, but the other he was obliged to leave in captivity a while longer. We may be assured that he spared no pains to accomplish the desired object and enlisted in his behalf the services of all who could in any manner render assistance. In the Archives of the State (Vol. 51, page 399) is a letter of Lt. Gov. Dummer to the Intendant General of Canada, dated April 15, 1724, in which he says " Theun happy Man M"" Stevens had two of his Children murder'd by the Salvages & two more carried into Captivity by them. I know I need not say anything to a Gent of y'" Rank & Goodness to move you to a generous Compassion for the distress'd." What effect this letter had does not appear, but Mr. Stevens succeeded that year in getting one of his sons released. The Farms Adjoining 67 Since this was written I have found a letter from Mr. Brintnall, an officer in command at Rutland, dated Aug. 19th, 1724, in which he says " Ensign Stevens is arrived with his son from Canada, he intends to be att Boston with your Honor on Monday next." This shows that the son returned in just about a year from the date of his capture, while the other had not been released the following Novem- ber. Soon after his return to Rutland, he addressed a letter to Governor Dummer and to the General Court which is of sufficient interest to copy entire.^ This letter not only shows Mr, Stevens' strong desire for the liberation of his own son but evinces sincere sym- pathy for all others in captivity. The expenses of Capt. Stevens in his attempts to regain his children, bore heavily upon him and almost impoverished him. In this unhappy condition he followed the example of many others and petitioned the General Court in 1732 for a grant of land " to settle his sons on " stating (in the words of the records. Vol. 15, page 325) that " his great losses and sufferings occasioned by the late Indian War more especially his great Charge in two Journeys to Canada, which he took to get his two Sons released out of Captivity which has obliged him to sell the greatest part of his land." In compliance with this request the Court granted, Nov. 29, 1732, 200 acres of land which were subsequently surveyed and laid out north of Watertown farm and south- easterly from Wachusett Hill. A plan of the lots is in Vol. 2 of Ancient Plans in Mass. Archives. The father, however, did not " settle his sons " on this farm but seven months after it was confirmed to him, sold it to Benj. Houghton for £100. current money. (Wor. Deeds, Vol. 8, page 267.) Of the two sons released from captivity it is stated that the youngest, Isaac, while with the Indians acquired many of their habits and became attached to his " squaw mother," ^ Mass. Archives, Vol. ii, page 407. 68 History of Princeton so that he would willingly have remained with her. He was married in Rutland where he resided many years. The eldest son, Phineas, remained in Rutland until about the year 1745, when he moved to Charlestown, N. H. In the latter town he became one of the most trustworthy of its citizens, and as a military man achieved a high reputation. His observation of " Indian habits and character and of their peculiar mode of strategy and warfare " during his captivity specially fitted him for the public duties he was called to perform. In 1749 he was commissioned by the Governor of Massachusetts to go to Canada and negotiate for the redemption of captives held by the Indians, and subsequently made several journeys for the same purpose. (See Mass. Archives, Vol. 73, page 690). In one visit he succeeded in redeeming John Stark (afterward the General of Revolutionary fame.) Capt. Stevens, the father, in his later years was in straitened circumstances, so much so that he was assisted by friends.^ Johnson's or Hartwell's Farm. Capt. Edward Johnson of Woburn, the early New England historian, had several grants of land from the Colony, on account of his public services, which were as varied as they were valuable. He is best known as the author of " Wonder Working Providence of Sion's Saviour," a work of much historical value notwithstanding its peculiarities. Capt. Johnson's eccentricity is shown very forcibly in one petition to the Court which appears among the State files. It is in the Captain's own writing and such an unusual document that we print it in full, although it has no special reference to the town of Princeton. " To the Supreame & high Hounoured power of this desspicable Desart Stated in the Hands of Magistrates & Deputyes Assembled in Generall Court Hounoured. Submitting to y"*" noe lesse pious then prudent Judg- ments. ' See History of Framingham for note about payment of money to Dea. Stevens. The Farms Adjoining 69 The Request of him, who would Bee: not onely y"' Humble Searvant but alsoe possessor of som small track of land to the quantity of 500 ! Acres (where the Lord whos is the Earth & the fullness theirof) hath layd it as yet vnpossessed by any Towns or person. Motives of Justice & Compassion, touched will soone take if your hounoured Could but see any in Him who has waited one this Hounoured assembly for, 15, years of his few evell dages & is Reddy (through high conceitednes of him selfe) to touch vppon the first Embrce of or Lawes & curbing the Enemies of this well ordered government yet the plumes of Such light fethers, may soone Be pressed downe By the gravetie of this Honoured Court in him who is bound in Conscience to Bee (what ever yo*^ Answer shall Be). Your Hounoured to Serve, Edward Johnsen. In answer to this petition the deputies think meete to graunt the pet*^ three hundred Acres of land where he can find it according to law with reference to the consent of o"" hon*^ mag''"". William Torrey. 8 (4) 1658. Consented to by the Magis*^ Edward Rawson, Secret^. (Mass. Archives, Vol. XLV, page 65.) This grant was taken up on the " Westerne wide of Merremacke River." In May, 1662, another grant of 200 acres was made Capt. Johnson, but as it was " never recorded " a con- firmation was made Oct. 20, 1663, the Court giving him " liberty to take it in any free place w*** in this jurisdiction according to lawe." Capt. Johnson died in 1672, without having located the last named grant, and no mention of it is found until 17 18 70 History of Princeton when Edward Johnson a grandson of the Captain peti- tioned for a confirmation and survey. This request was granted by the Court Nov. ii, 1718 and a survey made, but as the tract laid out encroached upon other grants, another survey was ordered in 1720. It was then described as " on a branch of Nashua River near Rutland East line 120 rods from Shrewsbury north bounds, 15 rods south from said Branch," running north 16° west 216 rods, west 12° south 143 rods south 12° east 215 rods and thence to the first point. This was situated in the southeasterly part of Princeton, as indicated on the plan, and is the lot subsequently known as the " Hartwell farm " and undoubtedly identical with " Hartwell 's meadows." It remained in the Johnson family until 1755 when Joseph and William Johnson and Elisha Sawyer sold it to Zachariah Harvey of Shrewsbury for £226.14. This date may determine the time of Dr. Harvey's settlement in Princeton; it was certainly between 1755 and 1758. (See Blagrove's Farm.) He purchased, a few years later, a large portion of the Blagrove's Farm adjoin- ing and surrounding the Johnson or Hartwell farm, making his possessions in that region some 1000 acres. It does not appear how this tract acquired the name of " Hartwell's Farm " or " Meadows," although it is signi- ficant that in laying it out Edward Hartwell as " Chain- man " assisted Jonas Houghton the surveyor. Mr. Hartwell was one of the influential men of Lancaster and Turkey Hills (Lunenburg) to which latter place he removed in August, 1725. He was called to fill important positions in both towns, and his connection with the mili- tary service of the Government, especially during the Indian troubles, brought him into prominence. In the State Archives there are many interesting letters of his and references to his services, showing him ever ready to serve his " King and Country." He died at the age of 97 " as full of piety as of days." The Farms Adjoining 71 Lancaster, August ye 23, 1725. May it plese your Honer: your Hon*^ Having Given me the Subscriber the Inspection of the Soldiers at s"^ Lan- caster under the Command of Capt. Josiah Willard and I haveing bult at Turkey Hils and my Enterest lying there, I am desined to Remove theither y^ nex weak if I may but obtain your Hon"" Leave there for hopeing that I shall there be in as Good a Capasety to Serve both my King and Contery. I Humbly Request your Hon"" would signify your pleasuer herein by y*" barer: your Hon''" most Humble Se^v^^^- Edward Hartwell. by y hand of Ensign Oliver Wilder. Joshua Wilder's Farm. Joshua Wilder, a son of Nath- aniel and Demaris Wilder of Lancaster, was born Sept. 20, 1712. The father moved from Lancaster to Petersham in 1743, the same year in which it is supposed the son built a house and settled with his family within the bounds of Princeton. There appears to be little doubt that, as has many times been asserted, he was the first settler in the town, and careful search among the public records has not revealed anything to the contrary, but rather confirmed the tradi- tion. The year previous to his father's removal to Petersham, Mr. Wilder petitioned the General Court for some land belonging to the Province. As the original petition has been preserved, and relates to the first dwelling and first public house in the town it is well to give a copy in full, — "Province of the Mass-j To his Excellency William Shirley, achusetts Bay [ Esq^, The Honbl Councill and Govenour J House of Deputies In Generall Court assembled at Boston, May, 1742. The Petition of Joshua Wilder most humbly shows That the Distance between Lancaster and a new Town called Nichewaug is about 25 miles. That about Ten miles west of Lancaster meeting House There is a Tract of Province Land which contains about one hunderd and Twenty acres Lying between Lands formerly Granted to Mr. Plaisted, & Mr. Allen and a farm called Blagroves farm which Lyes out of the bound of any Town. 72 History of Princeton That your Petitioner Tho a Poor man yet he humbly apprehends he has the Character of an Honest & Laboureous man and is minded to settle himself & family thereon. That therefore he is desirous of obtaining a Grant of said land on such condition as may be consistent with your Excellency & Hon's Wisdom & on as Easy terms as may be, and should he obtain it he apprehends it would be of great service to People Travelling from Lancaster to the new towns now Settleing westward to have a house to resort to in their Travaling. Your Petitioner therefore humbly prays your Excellency and Hon'^ to take ye premises into your wise consideration and act thereon as may be consistent with your known Goodness & your petitioner shall as in duty bound ever pray etc. Joshua Wilder." The following endorsement appears on the petition, — " In the House of Rep*^^"" April 7th 1743. Read and ordered that the prayer of the within Petition be Granted and that the Lands within mentioned contain- ing about one hundred and twenty acres be and is hereby given and Granted the Petitioner his heirs and assigns forever, provided that he does within one year have a good and convenient house built there for ye Reception of Travellers and have Ten Acres thereof Cleared and brought to English Grass or plowing within four years and that he Dwell Thereon with his family or have some other good family Dwell thereon. Sent up for Concurrence, T. Gushing Spk^" The Council concurred making the amendment " four years from this day." ^ It will be noticed that this land was about midway between Lancaster, his old home, and Nichewaug or Petersham to which place his father was removed. Mr. Wilder built his house as agreed and remained there until about 1755 when with his large family he removed to the neighborhood of Ware, where he died about the year 1762. This date of his removal is several years earlier than that named by Mr. Russell for it appears that by deed dated March 28, 1755 he " living on a farm between Lancaster * Mass. Archives, Vol. XL VI, page 136. The Farms Adjoining 73 & Petersham in ye County of Worcester " conveyed for £176. to Benjamin Houghton the 120 acres granted to him by the Court, described as the " farm I now live on & all ye Buildings thereon with ye Improvements on said Farm." Mr. Houghton already owned the " Allen " farm of 169 acres adjoining on the Southwesterly side. The estate passed into the hands of Peabody Houghton, and a portion of it at least has been held in the family ever since. CHAPTER IV EARLY INHABITANTS The Early Settlers of Princeton possessed the char- acteristics of the inhabitants of the average New England town. Many of them, perhaps the majority, were sturdy, progressive men, exemplary in conduct, of fair inteUigence and ready to grapple with the stern reahties of a Hfe in these rude lands of Worcester County. They came prepared to stay, and a majority of them carried out their purpose. But with these or following them, there came also (as was the case with every new settlement), those who were often changing their abode, peripatetic, unstable, resting, as it were, for the night and off by the dawn. And with them all, there were a few, evidently, whose presence was not particularly gratifying or acceptable to any community. It would be interesting, could we know the reasons influencing these families in their choice of locality for a home. Some of the inducements and attractions, beyond the ordinary desire to commence anew, in an untried and unbroken country, can be readily seen. The most desirable lands in Rutland had doubtless been appropriated, and naturally some of its people passed over into the adjoining easterly wing. The sale of the tract known — or described as Watertown farms led many of Watertown, Waltham, Weston and Cambridge to invest in land, and also to the subsequent occupancy by themselves or their friends. Sudbury too, with its thriving settlement, sent out some of its young men seeking suitable locations for establish- ment of homes, and they were welcomed in the town. The early Proprietors residing in Boston and elsewhere disposed of their rights to those willing to try the experi- ment in the wilderness or made a free gift to friends or relatives. 74 Early Inhabitants 75 One family drew another, as in the case of the Miricks, Woolsons, Harringtons, Hobbs and Jones, closely allied by marriage and kinship. Sons, receiving from their fathers, gifts of land, as the Masons, Norcrosses and others, married and settled down here. Young men venturing into the new settlement in search of employment, found not only that but, perhaps, also wives, which event quickly settled the question of remaining. Identity. But while the reasons governing the many may appear, yet in a majority of cases they are not ap- parent. Careful investigation fails to record the former residence of some of those more or less prominent in the district. A few appear to have dropped down from some- where and as suddenly to have dropped out, leaving nothing to show whence they came or whither they went, and while it is not surprising that we are unable to trace the smaller families, yet it seems strange that we lose trace of families containing six or eight grown-up children and never hear from them again. Of some we should know nothing, but for a simple record of marriage and the birth or death of children. The early records of the families furnish glimpses of toil, of hardship, of poverty, sickness and death, with the intimation, too, of brighter spots which are always to be found along the journey of life. Dates of Occupation. In attempting to determine the year in which the first inhabitants settled here, serious obstacles are encountered and an immense amount of labor has been expended with very unsatisfactory results. It is a fact that many owned their lots for years before settling upon them, while it is also true that others were on the ground long before they purchased. While the dates of the first recorded deed of land may, in many cases, approximately determine the day of settlement, in an equal number perhaps this conclusion would be at variance with well-established data. It is a perplexing feature of the town records, that they contain the entries of births as occurring in this town when 76 History of Princeton in fact they took place in other localities. And it is impossible to give a complete list of first settlers, owing to the loss of the earliest tax lists, and even with the later lists before us, it is not always possible to distinguish between proprietors only and residents. In the following lists the names of some single men which appear but once upon the records are omitted, and also those who are supposed to have been proprietors only. It is quite probable that other names should be added, but the list is as complete as we can make it. First Settlers. There is but little if any doubt that Mr. Joshua Wilder was the first permanent settler within the territory, establishing his house in 1742 on the " Houghton Road," where he entertained man and beast. It is a matter of record that there were in 1754 two houses on Potash farm but whether they were within the bounds of Princeton or over the line, in what is now Leominster, it is impossible to say. To whom should be assigned the second place in the list of incomers, it is difficult if not impossible to determine. The following list gives the names of the first inhabitants of the District, — Settlers before 1761 Lots Ephraim Allen 1755 Westboro' L John Bartlett 1759 15 Stephen Brigham 1759 Westboro' 14 Richard Cheever 1747-52 Boston 16 Robert Cowdin 1755 Holden 26 & 27 Oliver Davis 1753 Rutland 31 David Eveleth 1 755 Rutland 29 Joseph Eveleth 1753 Sudbury 26 Robert Forbush 1 757 Rutland 28 Gideon Fisher 1760 Dedham 28 John Frost 1759 Billerica North Daniel Garfield 1751 Shrewsbury Gardner's Farm Moses Garfield 1757 Shrewsbury Gardner's Farm William Gibbs 1759 Sudbury 8 Watertown Joseph Gibbs 1760 Westminster 30 Phineas Gleason 1757 Framingham 9 Ezra Gleason 1760 Framingham 9 Peter Goodnow 1 755 Sudbury 3 Zachariah Harvey 1759 Shrewsbury Blagrove Early Inhabitants y^j Settlers before 1761 Lots Samuel Hastings 1759 Watertown 6 Watertown Ebenezer Jones 1 757 Bedford 2 William Joyner 1758 Sudbury North Robert Keyes 1751 Shrewsbury Muzzy Tille Littlejohn 1759 Lancaster Muzzy Thomas Mason 1 756 Medfield 29 Sadey Mason 1756 Medfield 29 Paul Matthews 1758 Marlboro 2 Watertown Jabez Mead 1760 Rutland North Abijah Moore 1 747-50 Sudbury 3 Boaz Moore 1 759 Rutland 32 William Muzzy 1755-60 Sudbury 29 Timothy Mosman 1758 Ashburnham Potash Caleb Mirick 1752 Weston 4 Aaron Perry 1757 Mendon 5 David Parker 1758 Chelmsford 31 Abel Ray 1757 Marlboro' Mayhews (near) Stephen Rolph 1759 Mendon 10 Joseph Rugg 1 759 Holden 28 & L Amos Spring 1758 Weston ? 6&8 Watertown James Spring 1 759 Weston 8 Watertown Jabez Stratton 1 759 Lincoln 9 James Thompson 1 757 Holden 26 & 27 Joshua Wilder 1742 Lancaster Wilder's A True List of the Voters of Princetown District According to the Valuation Taken November, 1760. Capt. Eliphalet How Ens. Oliver Davis Joseph Rugg Dr. Zechariah Harvey Ephraim Allen Tim° Moseman Isaac Wheeler Robt. Keyes William Muzzy L'. Abijah Moore Joseph Gibbs Peter Goodenow James Thomson Caleb Mirick Joseph Eveleth 1 Assessors of Prince Boaz Moore j Town District Worcester S. S., March 30, 1761 Sworn to Before me Jn° Murray, Justice Pea.^ Doctor Harvey. The above list of voters appears with other papers relating to a town meeting held in March, 1 761, at which meeting it was alleged that the Moderator, Dr. Harvey, resorted to some unwarranted and illegal measures. (The Doctor was chosen Moderator, District * From Mass. Archives, Vol. 117, pages 647-652. 78 History of Princeton Clerk, Chairman of the Selectmen and of the Assessors, and Agent to the General Court.) A Protest was entered upon the records of the town and subsequently a petition reciting the grievances was sent to the General Court, asking that the proceedings be declared null and void. The Court, however, decided in Dr. Harvey's favor, confirming the proceedings. Attached to the petition referred to are the following names, — Non- Voters Voters Gideon Fisher Isaac Wheeler Thos. Mason Joseph Rugg Joseph Eveleth Eliphalet How Isaac Wheeler, Jr. Ephraim Allen Robert Cowdin Oliver Davis Sadey Mason James Thomson Timothy Keyes Wm. Muzzy Pebody How Joseph Gibbs The protest on the town records is signed by eight. Feb. '63, Harvey as Agent granted 11. To his Excellency Francis Bar- nard Esq., Captain General and Governor in Chief in and over the Province aforesaid. To the Honourable the Council and House of Represen- tatives in General Court assembled on Wednesday the twenty-fifth Day of March Anno Domini 1761. We the subscribers Inhabitants of the District of Prince- town in the County of Worcester and legal Voters in Town and District affairs, humbly shew your Excellency and Honours. That at ye District Annual Meeting held there on the sixteenth day of March instant, among other things to choose the usual District officers for said District, there were several Votes and Transactions altogether illegal and unwarrantable and unfairly and unduly obtained by means of many persons being admitted to vote at said meeting that were not legal voters there, and some that were not even Inhabitants of the same. That as the Voters and Province of the Massa- chusetts Bay in New England Early Inhabitants 79 Inhabitants were gathering together for the said meeting Zacharlah Harvey of the same District, Physician, who was our District Clerk Selectman and Assessor the last year, without any direction or order from the Selectmen, or without their knowledge or consent, opened the same meeting and called upon the said persons present, tho but a very small number to bring in their votes for Moderator which was then done immediately by such as were present the major part of them being no legal voters. The chief Part of the officers chosen at said meeting, and other matters transacted there, being obtained in the same way and manner, and Some Things never put to vote as the Warrant for Calling the meeting Required. Particularly there was an article in the Warrant to see if the District would Choose an Agent to appear at the General Court, but the said Harvey instead of putting it to vote to see if they would choose an Agent, knowing there was none needed, called upon them and insisted on their bringing in their vote for an Agent, without knowing or trying if it was the mind of the District first, to send one as the warrant directed, and so by the number present not being legal voters & by some means or other for the present being inclined to please him, as the meeting was at a Tavern. Voted the Doctor in at said meeting, and by that artifice the said Harvey procured himself to be chosen the Moderator. Whereupon a number of ye legal voters having notice of the Meeting being opened contrary to their expectation, the hour for the meeting being scarce arrived, as they apprehended, hastened to said meeting to regulate matters which they were informed were carrying on in such an hasty manner there, and perceiving a con- siderable number of persons present & acting which by the List of Estate and Valuation taken for the last year they knew were not voters qualified according to law to vote at such meeting, and also some who were not even inhabi- tants of said District called upon the said Harvey who was grown the Moderator in the manner aforesaid to purge the meeting, To see by the List of Estate and Valuation 8o History of Princeton taken by the Assessors last year and lodged in his hands who were voters & who were not of the number present t^ offering to vote. He answered it could not be done for that he had not the list there, and went on calling for votes and acting on the articles of the meeting without taking further notice of what the Inhabitants & Voters offered and objected to the proceeding. Harvey drove on and procured himself to be chosen the Moderator, District Clerk, a Selectman and an Assessor, as well as an Agent to appear at the General Court in behalf of said District all which proceedings, your peti- tioners humbly apprehend are illegal, arbitrary and de- structive of their most precious Privileges, the said Harvey being chosen into all the offices aforesaid by a majority of such as were not voters according to law, and against the Sense and Inclination of a Majority of Such as were legal Voters & personally present. Seeing which a number of the Voters belonging to same District entered their Dissent against said Harvey's unwarrantable proceeding (see notes) voted the Doctor in their Agent. All which offices the Doctor gravely ac- cepted and still attempts to hold. Nor was his conduct at our last meeting the only instance wherein the said Doctor Harvey hath acted contrary to his duty & trust, for on the 23d. Day of October last when the District had a meeting to choose an Agent to transact some matters in Behalf of said District at the Great and General Court, Captain Eliphalet How was chosen an Agent, the said Harvey then being District Clerk, refused and neglected to record the vote of the said How's being chosen and said it was best to burn it, but after that the said Harvey himself presumed to appear as our Agent & act accordingly, under the colour of his having been once before chosen Agent for the said District, though he utterly refused. Wherefore as matters are now carried in such a dis- orderly way & manner and as we who are the major Part of the legal Voters belonging to said District, apprehend Early Inhabitants 8i is directly contrary to the true intent & meaning of the law of this Province respecting such matters, humbly pray that the proceedings of this last meeting this March may be considered as void, and that the Inhabitants of said District may be Impowered and inabled to Call another meeting. Choose new officers, accept Roads and transact all other matters at some other meeting which might or should have been done at the last, in as full & ample manner as tho the same had never been held, or Some other way Relieve your Petitioners from their oppression as in your wisdom may Seem meet and your Petitioners as in Duty bound shall ever Pray. Settlers 1761-1771} Isaac Abbott 1769 Pomfret, Conn Hartwells Daniel Ball 1771 Shrewsbury Deadmare John Barker 1 761 13 George Barnard 1762 Brookline Blagrove or Hartwell near No. 2 Richard Baxter 1769 Medfield 19 & 26 opp. Brighams Phineas Beaman 1766 Lancaster 20 Watertown Samuel Bigelow 1765 Holden 2 Watertown Nathan Billings 1769 Hardwick Potash (North) Samuel Bixby 1762 Lancaster Blagrove John Bowen 1767 Lancaster North Everett Micah Bowker 1766 Sudbury Thaddeus Bowman 1767 Cambridge 3 Charles Brooks 1764 Marlboro' Enoch Brooks 1765 Concord I Watertown Abial Bush 1 765 Marlboro' Ebenezer Chamberlain, Jr. 1763 Westboro' i Watertown (Enoch Brooks) Benjamin Childs 1768 Brokline Daniel Clap 1761 Rutland 18 Anthony Clark 1767 Rutland 26 near Cowdina Ebenezer Colburn 1 768 Dedham 11 Samuel Conant 1768 Stow L&7 John Cowdin 1 761 Nathaniel Cutter Woburn 3 ? Josiah Davis 1770 Bedford? 13 (Haynes) William Dodd 1770 Holden Muzzy'3 Oliver Dresser 1763 Lancaster Blagrove near No. I Moses Eager 1770 Grafton Blagrove near i & 2 Paul Eager 1767 Shrewsbury L Samuel Easterbrooks . . . . 1771 Rutland ? * Only those having families included. 82 History of Princeton Settlers 1761-1771} Chamberlain Eustis 1771 Rutland ? Joseph Eveleth (younger). 1761 Stow 3 Watertown David Everett 1762 Dedham 11 Everett Ichabod Fisher 1770 Dedham 11 Everett Fisher 1 769 Dedham 11 William Foster 1769 Upton F. northern half Timothy Fuller 1768 5 Moses Gill 1767 Boston Phineas Gregory 1768 Weston 9 Watertown Elisha Gale 1763 Weston i Watertown Elisha Gale (younger). . . . 1767 Sutton Potash ? Henry Gale 1762 Weston I & 13 Watertown Jonathan Geary 1771 26 Jabez Gerould 1771 Dedham ? 15 Daniel Goodnow 1768 Sudbury 3 Timothy Goodnow 177 1 ? Lancaster Blagrove Jonas Goodnow 1 767 Abijah Harrington 1769 Weston Moses Harrington 1770 Weston near Woolsons Stephen Harrington 1765 Weston 9 & 10 Watertown Jonas Asa Harris 1 768 Shrewsbury 28 Ephraim Hartwell 1760 Concord 30 Joseph Haynes 1764 Sudbury 13 Elisha Hobbs 1765 Weston 8 Watertown Benjamin Holden 1 762 Dedham 28 Benjamin Houghton 1763 Lancaster Silas Houghton 1 762 Lancaster Abner How 1763 Marlboro' 7 Watertown Adonijah How 1765 Marlboro' 14 Watertown Daniel How 1 769 ? F. Joseph How 1 769 9 Peabody How 1 770 Rutland 24 Samuel Jewett ? 177 Lancaster 27 Roziers John Jones, Jr 1767 Dedham 20 Edward Joyner 1763 Leominster North Cyprian Keyes 1771 Shrewsbury 23 Timothy Keyes 1761 Rutland 26 Simeon Lyon 1771 Pomfret, Ct Blagrove near Wymans Artemas Maynard 1761 Shrewsbury James Mirick, Jr 1 761 Weston 4&A Josiah Mirick 1767 Weston Humphrey Moore 1765 Rutland 19 Jacob Morse 1 768 30 Uriah Newton 1769 Wilbraham ? Samuel Nichols 1761 Holden 5 Joseph Norcross 1763 Weston 6 * Only those having families included. Early Inhabitants 83 Settlers 1761-1771} Ephraim Osgood 1 768 Shutesbury North Sylvanus Oak 1771 Northboro' Blagrove Solomon Parks Parker. . . . 1767 Needham ? George Parkhurst 1769 Lancaster 4 Watertown Charles Parmenter 1761 Rutland 15 Reuben Parmenter 1 768 ? ? Andrew Paterson 1 770 Sudbury 11 Amos Powers 1762 Lancaster 5 Joseph Phelps 1768 Pomfret Conn Blagrove ? William Raymond 1769 Shrewsbury ? Thomas Raymore 1768 Dorchester East (Potash ?) Henry Rice 1 762 ? 28 Belcher Richards 1 764 Dedham 29 William Richardson 1771 Lancaster 9 Eliphalet Rogers 1771 3 or 2 Robert Rozier 1 765 Sudbury 27 Joseph Sargent 1765 Bolton Seth Savage 1 761 Rutland 33 William Skinner 1765 Sudbury 27 Jonathan Smith 1 767 Southerly ? Nathan Smith 1768 24&Willard Parker Place Warren Snow 1 764 Blagrove Ichabod Standley 1767 Blagrove Isaac Stratton 1 767 Lexington 9 Daniel Sumner 1 764 Mendon 5 Benjamin Taynton 1761 Shrewsbury 5 Obadiah Thacher 176 Attleboro' William Thompson 1 762 Holden 33 Isaac Thompson 1761 Rutland 15 Ambrose Tower 1761 Sudbury 1&2 Joseph Tower 1761 Sudbury i&2 Israel Underwood 1 766 ? ? Josiah Wetherbee (Jr.) . . . 1766 Stow A. Ephraim Wheeler 1765 Sudbury ? Samuel Woods 1762 Rutland 13 Ephraim Woolson 1767 Weston 9 Elisha Wilder 1760 Lancaster Stevens Silas Whitney 1758 2 Isaac Wheeler & Jr 1758 Medfield 27 Benjamin Willard 1751 Potash Benjamin Wilson 1751 Shrewsbury Willard's or Gardner's Farm Benjamin Wilson 1759 Northboro' ? East Wing Edward Wilson 1759 Shrewsbury Kneeland's Joseph Wooley 1755 Holden 2&9 Robert Work 1754 Upton 28 Charles (De) Wyman .... 1760 Concord Blagrove * Only those having families included. 84 History of Princeton In the above list occur the names of some who remained in town but a short time, and in a number of cases the same farm is represented by several owners during the period indicated. And the length of the list may be misleading as to the growth of the town. According to a statement of Mr. William Dodd, for many years town clerk, there were at the time of incorpo- ration 30 families, although this does not agree with the statements given in one of the petitions for incorporation which names 25 as the number of families in the East Wing at that date. There are now no means of determining accurately the population in 1759 but it may be estimated at from 125 to 150. In 1760 there were thirteen only who possessed the required property qualifications as voters. In 1764 the census showed a very material gain in numbers: 57 dwelling houses, 55 families with population of 284 of whom 72 were males over 16 years of age. Four years later there were 97 polls which would indicate a population of some 450; in 1769 106 polls; and in 1771, 121 polls. Immediately after the incorporation of the town in 1771 there was a decided increase of population, which in 1776 was reported as 701, covering some 140 to 150 families. Notwithstanding the trials and privations during the period of the Revolutionary War the number of residents increased so that in 1781 it is estimated that there were at least 800, with 182 polls, loi houses and 50 other build- ings, stores, mills, shops, etc. In 1790 the number reached 1016, including three colored persons, but from this year to the present time the in- crease has been very slow, the highest point reached being in 1840 when 1347 were shown by the United States census. Like all inland towns, it has suffered from the loss of its young men, unwilling to settle down upon the farm and there are no manufacturing facilities in the town to draw together mechanics and other laborers. The readiness with which all can travel nowadays does not help these smaller towns but tends to take and keep away many. Early Inhabitants 85 CENSUS OF 1790. Head of family. Gill, Hon' Moses, Esq Craft, Revd. Thomas Willard, Artemas Geary, David Dire, Nathaniel Rice, Joal Rice, William Bartlett, John Everett, Joshua , Wales, Abigail , Dodd, William Kyes, Robart , Bellows, Elijah Beamon, Jonas Harrington, Abijah. . Marbel, John Allen, Elisha Sawen, Ezekiel Ramer, Thomas Ramer, John How, Israel Keys, John Keys, Ephraim , Brown, James , Houghton, Silas Roper, Benjamin , Chandler, John , Richardson, Samuel. . Lyon, Alanson , Lyon, Seth , Wyman, Thomas , Ellis, James Deadman, Samuel , Smith, Jonas Kyes, Silas , Parker, Thomas Fay, Silas Whiteker, William. . . , Curtis, Mary , Munroe, John Whitney, Andrew. . . . , Murry, Jonathan , How, Addonijah Rogers, Eliphalet Sergents, Joseph Sergents, Amos Russell, John , Beamon, Phineas , Harrington, Moses. . . , Hager, Abraham , Gill, John Mirick, Ephraim How, Abner Norcross, Jacob Free white males of 16 years and upward in- cluding heads of families. Free white males under 16 years. Free white females in- cluding heads of families. 2 I 3 112 I I 3 I I 3 I 3 6 232 I I I 3 I 4 .. 5 1 . . I 325 3 •• 3 234 4 I 3 2 .. 3 124 226 I 5 2 III I . . 2 I 2 5 I 3 3 I I I 3 I 232 I 2 5 121 I 2 3 I . . I III I . . 2 1 2 4 2 .. 4 I 4 2 224 3 3 7 I 4 3 I 4 3 I I I 4 I 2 3 I I 3 3 I 6 1 3 4 2 . . 2 2 4 2 I 3 224 1 .. 4 2 •■ 3 217 126 4 I 4 I •• 5 All other free per- sons. 86 History of Princeton Head of family. Hastings, Samuel , Merriam, Amos , Merick, John - Mirick, Stephen Mirick, Caleb Evelett, Joseph Mathews, Paul Hobbs, Elisha Gregory, Phinehas Mirick, Dorothy Brooks, Enoch Perrey, Aaron Fuller, Timothy Parmenter, Reuben. . . . Cutting, Josiah Parker, Philemon Chittendon, Isaac Mirick, Ruth Moor, Uriah Tilton, Joseph Fisher, Ichabod Rice, David Thomson Isaac Chase, Josiah Andras, Nathaniel Underwood, Israel Park, Benjamin Bartlett, John Brigham, Stephen Davis, Solomon Ralf, Stephen Rice, Solomon Bangs, Josiah Hastings, James Richardson, William. . . Gill, Micah, Esq Brooks, David Watson, John Cheevers, Bartholomew Cheevers, Daniel Holbrook, David Willard, Solomon Ball, Aaron Sergants, Daniel Thacher, Obediah Smith, Isaac Stevans, Jonas Parker, John Newton, Charles Gleasson, John Kyes, Israel Garfield, Eliakim Brooks, Charles Parmenter, Luther How, Peabody Mayson, Paul Free white males of i6 years and upward in- cluding heads of families. Free white males under i6 years. Free white females in- cluding heads of families. All other free per- sons. Early Inhabitants 87 Head of family. Straton, Samuel Mayson, Silas Reed, Benjamin Baker, Joseph Hobbs, Silas Hanes, Joseph Hanes, Samuel Harris, Asa Wooley, David Willson, Ephraim. . . . Gleason, Thomas. . . . Goodnow, Edward. . . How, Antapas Whitcomb, Asa, Esq. Coopland, Eliphlet. . . Woods, Samuel Moor, Humprey Davis, Josiah Baxter, Richard Kilbourne, Calvin. . . . Hoit, David Thompson, William. . Smith, Nathan Davis, Samuel Holden, Benjamin. . . . Fisher, Jesse Mayson, Sardy Mayson, Thomas Felton, John Beamon, Silas Hartwell, Isaac Robbins, Samuel Clarke, Norman Baxter, Joseph Moor, Boz Willson, Ephraim. . . . Willson, Lewis Jones, Nathan Hoit, Benjamin Everett, Susanna Newton, Uriah Rugg, Joseph Rice, Asa Savage, Seth Davis, Oliver Joyslin, Silas Ralf, Edward Ellery, Elizabeth. . . . Parmenter, Charles. . Hinds, Eli. Free white males of 16 years and upward in- cluding heads of families. Free white males under 16 years Free white females including heads of families. All other free per- sons. Princeton Town in the Gore Adjoining. Rice, Elisha 2 I I I 2 3 1 3 4 6 2 Houghton, Abel Allen, Daniel Rice, Elijah 88 History of Princeton Copy of a paper found among the town files, supposed to relate to valuation for the U. S. Direct Tax 1798. 1 0* T3 1 a 9 45 i 13 1 Josiah Davis, On North of road to Meet- 576 ing-house. Molly Moore, Road Rutland to Princeton, 804 8 48 Samuel Woods. on 19. On 13 town road i m. S. W. of M. H. 672 8 Z3, .... John Parker, 3 miles South of Meeting- House. 550 4 6 Obadiah Thacher, 3 miles south of Meeting- house. 702 10 60 John Whitcomb, North of road to Holden 2\ miles. 684 4 19 Charles Newton, 35 miles South of meeting- house. 702 6 24 John Gleason, On South of road from west part to Holden. 1400 6 23 2 Widow Mary Brooks, On road from Jonas How's in Rutland to Princeton, 3^ miles from Meeting- house. 450 8 44 3 Jonas & Chas. Brooks On road from Jonas How's in Rutland to Princeton, 3^ miles from Meeting- house. 450 8 44 2 Charles Mirick, if miles from Meeting-house 988 17 119 2 Peabody How, South of road to Holden west by town road 2% miles from M. H. 798 8 40 Benj. Holden, East side of road to Rutland Wood-house, i shay-house, i corn-house. 624 8 52 • • : Sadey Mason, East side road to Rutland. 75° 7 34 Reuben Hale, West side road to Rutland. 1064 16 57 2 Thomas Mason, Road to Rutland 3 miles from M. H. I Wood-house. 1080 12 70 Samuel Davis, East side road to Holden on Waldo Farm. Kitchen part 18X24. 720 20 120 2 Nathan Smith, East side road to Holden 2f South of Meeting-house. 722 3 10 .... Isaac Chittenden, 3^ miles Southeast of Meet- ing-house. mo 9 52 .... Jonas Steams, North side road to Hubbard- ston \ mile from M. H. Porch 12X12. 624 9 43 . . . . Calvin Kilbum, North side road to Meeting- house 25 miles bounded on South by road. West by Thompson, East by Josiah Davis. ISO 7 30 Elizabeth Cowdin East side of road to Rutland. 948 7 22 Early Inhabitants 89 1 •0 i a 1^ J3 ■.s 1 SB 1 CO 22 127 w Andrew Whitney, i\ miles from Meeting-house. 1073 2 Jesse Brown, 3 miles from Meeting-house On east side road leading to County. 702 4 25 .... Thankful Houghton, 2 miles from M. H. North side road. 960 14 87 2 Samuel Dadman, 3^ miles from Meeting-house 990 12 78 Jonas Smith, 3j miles from Meeting-house. 1 140 8 50 James Brown, South part of Spooner farm East side of road. 625 S 26 John Watson, West side County road i mile South of Meeting- house. 792 18 118 2 David Brooks, East side County road. 1000 23 145 2 Josiah Cutting, miles N. by W. from Meeting-house. 672 14 76 2 Ruth Mirick, \ east side road to M. H. 336 7 50 2 Caleb Mirick, Near Meeting-House. 1080 27 ISO 2 Solomon Rolph, in which he lives on road to Hubbardston, i\ miles to M. H. 500 3 15 Susana Ralph, Old house on County road to Hubbardston. SCO 3 15 Mary Rice, North side road to Hubbard- 780 6 ston, I mile west from M. H. John Dana, Road to Rutland, i\ miles south of M. H. 1 1 20 24 125 2 William Whittaker, Govr. Gill road 25 miles east M. H. 990 14 92 Amos Sargent North side road to Sterling, 720 13 82 2 Joseph Sargent one mile east from M. H. 720 14 72 2 Ephraim Wilson, 5 mile south of meeting-house east side road to Rutland. Wood house 30X12 25 262 2 other dwelling-house on 728 8 34 .... westerly part of home- stead on road from Thomas Gleason's to M. H. Thomas Gleason, North side of road to Meet- 1368 114 2 ing-house. 1368 114 2 Widow Lois Goodnow, Not finished woodhouse 15X18 House finished, woodhouse 18X30 1 140 22 109 2 Joshua Eveleth, Town road west Qf meeting- house, unfinished. 1 140 24 252 2 Jolin Jones, Town road from County road to David Rice's. S40 5 19 William Thompson, new house 3 miles southwest of Meetinghouse. 1064 13 76 Antipas How, On north side road to Meet- ing-house. 656 7 38 Reuben Mimroe, On south side road to Bos- ton, 25 miles from Meet- ing-house. 684 3 15 . . . . 90 History of Princeton John Russell, Adonijah How, Ephraim Mirick, South on County road west on road to Westminster. No. East by heirs Col. Sar- gent. Homestead north of County road to Hubbardston, 120 rods from M. H. ^ T3 C •^ £ rt i •0 IU.2 960 8 49 1 140 26 170 1080 13 68 Size of Windows, house. squares. John Thompson I 38X18 7 87 7X9 County road to Hubbards- ton westerly by town road 3 miles to meeting. David Rice I 36X27 10 20 6X8 County road to Hubbards- ton westerly on Hubb. 4 30 6X8 3 miles to meeting. 2 sto- Elisha Hobbs I 38X18 17 220 7X9 30 6X8 ries, 1 5 miles from meeting Elisha Hobbs I 26X24 S 60 7X9 Old, unfinished. Abishai & Theophi- lus Eveleth, occu- pied by Theophilus. I 38X20 II 153 6X8 Phineas Beaman I 37X34 25 351 7X9 2 stories. Porch 12X15. Abijah Harrington. . . I 38X30 25 350 7X9 2 stories. Porch 14X12. Barn 62X30. 2 miles to meeting. Jonas Keyes. Black- smith shop 43X15 I 38X30 3 53 7X9 13 19s 7X9 2I miles to meeting. Farm yard and bark-house, William Everett 4 miles to meeting. Joshua Everett I 30X18 18 204 7X9 2 stories, 4 miles to meeting. Adjoining I 32X18 I 37X28 I story. Half upright, floors laid and Abigail Wilde I IS chimney up. Ephraim Osgood Houghton Osgood. . . . I 36X28 II 125 7X9 Front upright. Israel Howe I 32X16 I 38X30 7 93 7X9 27 336 7X9 Old addition, 34X10 2 stories, i mile to meeting. Abner How (Built in 1786.) Ephraim Mirick, Jr. . I 40X28 21 282 6X8 I mile to meeting. Enoch Brooks I 30X28 21 277 6X8 Part upright with porch. Elisha and Phineas Gregory, one dwelling house 40 feet by 16, one adjoining thereto 49 by 12 feet, the house unfinished. 17 windows 223 squares of glass, 7 by 9 40 rods to compose the Home lot, if miles from meeting, 83 acres in the farm; bounds easterly on Stephen Mirick, Early Inhabitants 91 northerly on Abijah Harrington, westerly on Elisha Hobbs, southerly on Moses Gill. One barn 60 by 30 wants cover- ing, one shed 30 by 10, twenty-nine acres, six acres meadow, the rest upland and ordinary, bound N & W on Thos. Raymore, S & E Israel How and Edward Raymore. Jonas Beaman, one dwelling house, 38 by 30, 16 feet by 38 two stories high, stone, one porch 12 by 8. 20 windows 291 glass 7 by 9. 80 rods home lot one dwelling house 38 by 20. Stone, 2 stories, floors laid only part finished. 17 windows 360 squares glass 7 by 9. 40 rods home lot 83I acres, one barn 62 by 28, one barkhouse 40 by 28, 28 squares glass in Barkhouse. Shed 69 by 12 & one 22 by 10. CHAPTER V INCORPORATION The District and Town. The action of the inhabitants and proprietors of the East Wing and the farms adjacent, towards incorporation of either or both tracts as a dis- tinct town, forms an interesting chapter in the history of Princeton. The subject had evidently been under discussion for several years, but the first public act in relation thereto was in the form of a petition to the General Court on the 8th of June, 1758, by Benjamin Houghton and others " praying that certain Farms formerly granted by the General Court to Separate petitioners lying near the great Wachusett Hill, and contiguous to Rutland East Wing, containing a Tract of about six miles by three miles in extent, may together with the East Wing of Rutland containing about the like quantity, upon which there are about thirty families already settled, be erected into a Township." Unfortunately the original petition cannot be found and we lose the names of those who joined with Mr. Houghton in this petition. Mr. Houghton owned several large tracts of land, purchased of the Province, and lived upon another in the Eastern part of (Princeton) near Sterling, hereto- fore described as Wilder's purchase, and the scheme pro- posed above would naturally appear very desirable to him. The petitioners were granted leave to bring in a bill, and although no such action appears to have been taken, the two tracts were surveyed, the East Wing in June 1758 and the farms probably during the following July or August. The accompanying plans show the relative situation of the two sections and enable the reader to form some idea 92 Incorporation 93 of the nature of the controversy which ensued between the two, a controversy which waged fiercely for some time. The proprietors of the Wing were not at all satisfied with the action upon Mr. Houghton's petition, forcing upon them the burdens consequent upon the building of roads through the farms, and other expenditures, and they prepared a petition asking incorporation of the Wing alone as a town. The petition is as follows: " Province of the Massachusetts Bay, To His Excellency Thomas Pownall Esq^ Governor & Commander in Chief in and over His Majestys Province of the Massachusetts Bay, to the Hon^'"" His Majesty Council & Hon^'^ House of Representatives December 29, 1758. The Petition of vs. the Subscribers Inhabitants of the East Wing of Rutland soe called. In the County of Worcester Humbly shews — That the Major Part of your Petitioners Live Six or Eight miles from the Nearest Pleace of Publick Worship which renders it Almost Imposable for your Petitioners to attend and more especially in the winter Season By Reason of the Badness of the Roads, that under our Present Situation we have no Power To Lay out Roads no Buld Bridges nor to Do anything else that may Be an Induce- ment to people to Come and Setle amongst vz, the Quan- tity of Land Contain'd in said Tract is near about the Halfe of Six Miles Squeir as May appear by the Plan Hereto Annexed, that we have Now about 25 familys Living on Said Tract and we apprehend with a Little of your Excellency & Hon*^* assistance we should soon have Double that Number to Settle on said Tract. Wherefore your Petitioners Humbly Prays your Ex- cellen(c)y & Hon""^ Compassionate Consideration and that the Lands Contain'd and Delineated in the forementioned plan be Erected Into a Town or District as your Excellency and Hon"^ In your great wisdom may Think Proper, and 94 History of Princeton your Humble Petitioners as in Duty Bound Shall Ever Pray. Ephram Wheler Eliphalet How Joseph Gibbs Robert Work Ephraham Hartwel James Thomson Isaac Wheeler Thomas Masson Isaac Wheeler Ju Amos Powers Boaz Moore Joseph Eveleth Ephraim Allen Timothy Keyes Benjamin Willson Charly Durntcan Robert Forbus Stephen Brigham Pebody How Oliver Davis George Smith Sadey Mason John Bartlet William Muzzy Rob* Cowdin This petition has the following endorsement. " In Council January 5, 1759. Read and Ordered that the Petitioners notify the Non Resident Proprietors of Land lying in said East Wing of Rutland by Inserting the substance of this Petition in some of the Boston News Papers three weeks successively that they shew Cause if any they have on the second Wednesday of the next sitting of this Court why the Prayer thereof should not be granted. Sent down for Concurrence Thos. Clarke, Dp*^ Secry. In the House of Rep^^ Jan^. 5, 1759. Read and non Concurred; and Ordered that this Peti- tion be Dismissed. Also Ordered that the Petition of Benj"^ Houghton & others presented to this Court in June last be likewise dismissed. Sent up for Concurrence, T. Hubbard Spk^l This movement of the inhabitants and proprietors of the Wing set the ball in motion, and for a time there was evidently some active work done by the friends of the ' Mass. Archives, Vol. CXVII, page 430. Incorporation 95 different parlies, the one favoring the scheme of incor- porating the Wing alone, and the other fearing that the Farms would be left out in the cold. If in those " good old days " a " lobby " existed, it very likely had its part to perform in this contest. Petition of " The Farms." The summary dismissal by the House of How's as well as of Houghton's petition of the previous June was doubtless a surprise and a disappoint- ment to both parties, and seemed to add fuel to the flames or increased motion to the ball of controversy, and the contest was renewed with vigor. A month had scarcely passed when Mr. Houghton and his allies presented another request, fortified doubtless by stronger arguments, and perhaps with more signatures than before. This petition is as follows : the Signatures to the original appearing to be genuine autographs, comprising nearly all, if not all of the inhabitants of the Farms; together with a few of the proprietors or residents of the Wing. To His Excellency Thomas Pownal Esq' Capt. General and Governor in chief in and over His Majesties province of the Massachusetts Bay in New England to the Honor- able His Majesties Counsel and House of Representatives. The Petition of the Proprietors and Inhabitants of sundry farms Lying between Lancaster and Narragansett No. 2 and Contigious to Rutland East Wing So called and also proprietors and Inhabitants of Said Wing, Humbly Sheweth that said farms and Wing being Incorporated into a Destinct Township Will make a very good one and Do not Contain the Contents of Six miles square and that Said Wing by itself will not be able to Defray the Charges of building a Meeting House Setling a minister and main- taining the Gosple among them and making Rodes Without an Intolarable Hevey Tax, and that said farms are no wayes able to Defray such charges by themselves and cant be accommodated to aney other town, and will be forever Disobliged if not Laid to said Wing and both together Will find the charges of a new settlement hevey enough and both Wing and farms are at present under very Deficult 96 History of Princeton Circumstances by the extream Distance and badness of the Rodes to the Public Worshep of God in aney other Town. We can but Sildom attend it and in the Winter Season are quite shut up which circumstances are not only Destresing to the present Inhabitants but very Descorag- ing to new se tiers. Wherefore the Humble prayer of your petitioners is that said Wing and farms may be Incorporated as above said, Which we as in Duty shall Ever pray. January y"" 29th 1759. Farms. Jonathan Spring Timothy Bemis Isaac Whittemore Jonathan Bulard Henry Gail Lemuel Jones Jonathan Jones Braddyll Smith Wing. Jabez Stratton Ezra Gleason John Mirick, Ju^ Moses Gill Amos Powers Daniel Sumner Aaron Peary Benjamin Houghton Zechariah Harvey Elisha Wilder Joel Houghton Silas Whitney Tristam Cheny William Joyner Abel Ray Robert Keyes Tille Litteljohns Saml Hastings Amos Spring Paul Mathew Jonas Harrington Henry Spring Jeremiah Whitemore Peter Goodenow Richard Cheever Jonathan Power Abijah Moore Caleb Mirick Samuel Nickols James Mirick Elisha Jones Isaac Jones Nathan Meriam Ebenezer Jons John Jones, Jun^ Ambrose Tower Joseph Tower In the House of Rep. Febr^ 7, 1759. Read and Ordered that the Pef^^ serve the prop'^^ and Inhabitants of the East Wing of Rutland (so called non petitioners) with a copy of the Pet° by inserting the Sub- stance thereof in one of the Boston Newspapers three Weeks successively That so they Shew cause (if any they have) on the second thursday of the next Setting of this Court why the Prayer thereof should not be granted. Sent up for Concurrence, T. Hubbard Spk^ In Council Febr" 8, 1759. Read and Concurred, A. Oliver, Sec^. Consented to T. Pownall.i ' Mass. Archives, Vol. CXVII, page 437. l0^Jt->X^ /^fe^,4^ Incorporation 97 Protest. The failure of the petitioners to give proper notice to the other parties occasioned the following protest and action. " The memorial of the Subscribers, Inhabitants and proprietors of the East Wing of Rutland and the County of Worcester. They therefore humbly pray that Inasmuch as they have never been served with a Copy of a Petition by having the Substance thereof Inserted in the News Papers agreable to sd order of Court, that sd Petition may be dismised or Referred to the next Session of this Hon^'^ Court that so they may make answer to said Petition when they know the Substance of it. And as in Duty Bound shall Ever Pray." " Eliphalet How Stephen Brigham Sadey Mason Boaz Moore Robert Cowdin Charles Parminter Isaac Wheeler Ephraim Allen Thomas Mason Benj amine Wilson (This is not the B. Wilson of the north part.) William Muzzy Robert Forbush Isaac Wheeler George Smith Joseph Gibbs Pebody How James Thomson Jonathan Fisk Oliver Davis John Bartlet Timothy Keyes Ephraim Wheeler Joseph Eveleth Robert Rozer " In Council March 9, 1759. Read again together with the Answer of Eliphalet How and others Inhabitants & Proprietors of the East Wing of Rutland; and it appearing that they had not been notified of the Substance of the Petition as the Court had ordered. Ordered that the con- sideration of said Petition be referred to the next May Session " notice to be given in Boston Papers. " In Council June 8, 1759. Again read with the answer of the Inhabitants & Proprietors of the East Wing & 98 History of Princeton ordered that Samuel Watts and Benjamin Lincoln Esq''^ with Such as the Hon^'*" House shall appoint be a Committee to take the same under Consideration hear the Parties & Report what they judge proper to be done thereon." ^ Rejoinder. The House appointed Col. Lawrence; Cob Gerrish & Col. Whitcomb. The time intervening between March and June afforded ample opportunity to the pro- prietors of the Wing to prepare a vigorous answer to the argument of the opponents. It is well worth reading. Province of the Massa- To His Excellency Thomas Pow- chusetts Bay nail Esq'' Governour & Com- mand'" in Chief in & over his Majestys Province of the Massa- chusetts Bay To the Hon*"''' his Majestys Council & the Hon^^^ House of Representatives in Gen' Court assembled May y'30th, 1759. The Memorial of us the Subscribers, Inhabitants & Proprietors of the East Wing of Rutland (so called) in the County of Worcester, in answer To a Petition of the Pro- prietors & Inhabitants of Sundry farms Lying Between Lancaster & Narragansett No. 2, in sd County, Humbly Sheweth — That Whereas the said Proprietors and Inhabitants of said farms did by their petition To the Honble Court at their Session in March last Represent that the said wing and farms Being Incorporated into a District Town or District would make a very good one; your Memorialists Beg leave to say, that they are very sure that Every Impartial man that is acquainted with the Situation «& Circumstances, of said wing & farms will Readily say that the wing of itself will make a Much Better Settlement than if the farms are laid to said wing, for this Reason, Because the farms in General are some of the Poorest land, perhaps, that there is in the Province, and Lyes in a very Bad form, i Mass. Archives, Vol. CXVII, page 439. Incorporation 99 and although the said Proprietors and Inhabitants of said farms did Exhibit a Plan to Your Excellency & Honours that Appeared that said farms lay in a Very good form to Be adjoyned to s^ wing; your Memorialists beg leave to say that they are very sure that said Plan is not true. But Done as they Apprehend to Deceive your Excellency & Honours; and as almost all the Best of the land in s^ wing Lyes in the Southerly side of it, & the Chief of the Inhabi- tants living on that side, and Not Only so, but the land on the Northerly side, Never will admitt of Half so good a settlement as the Southerly side will and if the farms, shall be annexed to said wing, it would Carry the Center of the wing & farms to the Very Northerly side of s*^ wing, which would oblige the two thirds of the Inhabitants always to Travel Three or four miles to meeting, and the great Difficulty that your Memorialists must be put to, in making Highways & Building Bridges through a very Rough Rocky Country will Burden them so, that they had Rather have one Quarter of their Real Estate Taken from them, then to be Obliged to Joyn with those People where they are Certain they shall always live in Trouble and Difficulty. And as the Said Wing Contains Better than Twelve Thousand Acres of land and is Capable of making a very good Settlement of itself and Cost your Memorialists a Very great Price, And if your Excellency and Honours shall annex those Farms to the wing, we apprehend it would be taking away the Rights of your Memorialists and giving it to those that have no Just Claim to it — Your Memorialists Therefore Humbly Pray Your Ex- cellency & Honours wise and Compassionate Consideration in this affair and that you would Relieve your Memorialists out of the great Difficulty that they must Inevitably fall into if they are sett off with the said farms & Dismiss the Petition of the Proprietors And Inhabitants of s^ farms, and Incorporate said wing into a Town, or District as your Excellency & Honours Shall See meet, or otherwise Relieve your Memorialists as in your great wisdom you shall Think Proper. 100 History of Princeton And as in Duty Bound shall Ever Pray. Joseph Eveleth Sadey Mason Timothy Keyes Ephraim Allen Stephen Brigham Oliver Davis John Bartlett Thomas Mason Boaz Moore Isaac Wheeler Ephraim Hartwell William Muzzy Pebody How Rob^ Cowdin Isaac Wheeler Jona Knight Eliphalet How Jorg Smith Joseph Gibbs Robert Forb(us) James Thompson Benjamine Willson ^ To the casual observer it would seem that the advocates of the incorporation of the Wing alone, held the strongest position, but the difficulties of reconciling the interests of all concerned can be readily understood.^ With these petitions are several other papers of interest. " We the Sibscribers Inhabitants upon the farms Lying Beetwen Lancaster and Narragansett Do pray your Hon'^ to Consider the Sad Condition that we shall Be in if s^ farms petisioned for should Be annexed to the East wing for By Survoing we Do find as we think a Sufficiency of s'^ farms for a Township to Settle the Gospel in But if sad part petisioned for should Be laid to s'^ wing we Shall have no privelidge of the Gospel preached By Being So far of tharfor we humbly pray your honers that you would Lett the whole of s*^ farms Lye to Gether til Such times as we Can Be Incorporated into a Town By our Selves and you ' Mass. Archives, Vol. CXVII, page 442. ^ Three plans are on file in the State Archives with these petitions. The first, dated June 26, 1758, measuring about 12 by 18 inches, shows the Wing alone with an area of 12,899 acres. The second dated, Sept. 4, 1758, gives a view of the Wing rated at 1 1,708 acres only, and the farms adjoining contain- ing 7283 acres. This plan covers the territory first incorporated as a District. The third, dated Oct. 2, 1759, endorsed " A Piatt of the farms," includes with the farms shown on the second plan, a large tract of 4900 acres on the north embracing "No Town" and extending to Lunenburg line. All of these farms were included within the bounds of the town as incorpo- rated in 1 77 1, but the 4900 acres were taken off by act of 1773. Incorporation loi will Greatly as we think add to the interest and welfare of your most humble Servants. September y^ 28th 1759 Benj* Wilson William Joyner Edward Wilson John Frost Tristram Cheney The latter, Oct. 5, 1759, desired his name to be " blotted oute " of this petition. Lancaster October 7th 1759 these may Certifie that the Lands north of the farm Called Potash farms betwixt Leominster & Narragansett is Generally Rough Land & will admitt of but fue Good Settlements. Att Joseph Wilder John Bennit N. B. The above subscribers were the Gentlemen that Layed out the above mentioned Lands and assested in Deviding them." " October ye 6th 1759 This may Certify Womesoever it may Consern that the lands Between Leominster Lewning- burge and Narrowgasett No. 2 and as far as potarsh farms is Chefly uninhabitable and very bad Land and no waye fit for but a very few Inhabitants. Test our hands, Ezra Houghton. Jonathan Wilder.* This description of the land as " Chefly uninhabitable " will not be contradicted by any of the present generation who are at all familiar with " No Town " lands. Upon the recommendation of the committee to whom the several petitions were referred a special committee was appointed " to view the farms & the East wing and report to the Court." » Mass. Archives, Vol. CXVII, pages 445-447. 102 History oj Princeton Report. On the nth of October their report was pre- sented as follows: " The Committee appointed on the Petition of the proprietors and Inhabitants of sundry farms Lying between Lancaster and Narragansett No. 2 and Contigious to Rutland East Wing so called and also proprietors of s'^ wing having Repaired to the Land men- tioned in s"^ Petition viewed the same And heard the Parties are of oppinion that the prayer of the Petition be Granted and the s'^ farms together with s^ East Wing be incorporated into a Sepperate District agreable to a Plan accompanying s"^ Petition and the Petitioners have Liberty to Bring in a bill accordingly. Which is Humbly Submitted, Gam^ Bradford by Order." This report was accepted the same day and Capt. Richardson was directed " to bring in the Bill," which was done the following day. The act of incorporation is as follows: Anno Regni Regis Georgii Secundi Tricesimo Tercio L. S. An Act for erecting the East Wing of Rutland, so called, in the County of Worcester, and sundry farms contiguous thereto, lying between Lan- caster and Narraganset number two, into a separate District by the name of Prince Town. Whereas a number of the Inhabitants and Proprietors of the East Wing of Rutland, in the County of Worcester, and the proprietors and inhabi- tants of sundry Farms contiguous thereto, lying between Lancaster and Narraganset No. 2, have represented to this court many difficulties they labour under, and praying that they be made a seperate District. Therefore, he it enacted by the Governor, Council, and House of Representa- tives, That the said East Wing of Rutland, so called, and sundry farms lying contiguous thereto, contained within the bounds hereafter mentioned, be and hereby is erected into a distinct and seperate District by the name of Prince Town: — viz. beginning at the northwest corner of Lancaster second Precinct, being also the southwest corner of Leominster, from thence running north 54 degrees west seven hundred and sixty rods to a heap of stones upon the line of Narraganset No. 2, from thence run- ning west thirty-five degrees south seven hundred and eighty-eight Rod to the southern corner of said Narraganset number two, then turning and running south-east fifty-six Rod to the northeast corner of said Incorporation 103 Rutland East Wing, then turning and running west thirty Degrees south eleven hundred and sixty Rod, on the northwest line of said Wing to the westerly corner of said Wing, then running south thirty-nine de- grees east sixteen hundred and seventy Rod, being the dividing line of the first settlers part of Rutland, the said Wing to the southerly corner of said East Wing, then turning and running east thirty-five degrees north eleven hundred and fifty rods on Holdin fine to the corner of said East Wing, Holdin and Shrewsbury, and from thence running on the same point three hundred and ninety Rod on Shrewsbury line to the River, and from thence bounding on Lancaster second Precinct to the first mentioned bounds, at that the said District be and hereby is invested with all the Privileges, Powers, and Immunities that Towns in the Province by Law do or may enjoy, that of sending a Representative to the General Assembly only excepted. Provided, nevertheless, and be it further enacted, That the said District shall pay their proportion of all Town, County and Province Taxes already sett or granted to be raised on the Towns of Rutland and Lancaster as if this act had not been made. And be it further enacted, That William Richardson, Esq. be and hereby is empowered to issue his warrant to some principal Inhabitant of said District requiring him to notify and warn the inhabitants of said District qualified by law to vote in Town affairs to meet at such time and place as shall be therein set forth to choose all such officers as shall be necessary to manage the affairs of said District. October 12th, 17 5g. This Bill having been read thru several times in the House of Representatives — Passed to be enacted. S. White, Spk. October i6th, iJSQ- This Bill having been read thru several times in Council — Passed to be enacted. A. Oliver, Sec'y- October 20th, 17 5g. By the Governor. I consent to the enacting of this Bill. T. POWNALL. Thus ended the controversy so long and so earnestly carried on by early inhabitants of the town. During its later history there have been struggles equally warm and vigorous over matters of far less importance. For some years after the organization of the District, there was a continual increase in the number of inhabitants, and with the formation of a church and establishment of schools as hereafter described, there was a marked growth in prosperity. 104 History of Princeton The Town. As long as they remained a " District " they could send no representative to the General Court, which appeared so desirable that in 1771 measures were taken to secure incorporation as a town and the following petition was prepared, " Province of Massachusetts Bay. To His Excellency Thomas Hutchinson, Esq., Governor and Commander-in- Chief in and over said Province. The Honorable His Majesty's Council and House of Representatives in General Court assembled at Cambridge. The Petition of Princetown, in the County of Worcester, humbly shews. That said place composed of Province Land and other Lands, and Farms which never before belonged to any Town or District to the Amount of near eight thousand acres, together with a part of the original grant of twelve miles square to the Proprietors of Rutland, which part was never incorporated into the Town of Rutland, or any other Town, as many of this Honorable Court are well Knowing, was in the year 1760 (1759) erected into a Dis- trict by the name of Princetown, and was not annexed to any Town to join with them in the choice of Representative and never can join in any, without being subject to greater difficulties, than any District lately made by reason of the distance, and badness of the Roads. Your Petitioners therefore humbly pray (seeing said District was composed of lands, which never before be- longed to any town or District) you would out of your wonted goodness erect said place into a Town, with all the powers and privileges which are enjoyed by other towns in this province. And as in Duty bound will ever pray, Boaz Moore Caleb Mirick Joseph Sargent Ebenezer Jones Committee The result of this petition was the passage of an act, which is summarized. Incorporation 105 By this act all the unincorporated lands adjoining were included within the bounds of the new town. This was more than was asked for or desired, as it brought into the town limits the undesirable lands " (chefly uninhabitable)" on the north as far as Lunenburg, entailing upon the town additional expense for maintenance of roads, etc. Whether this clause in the act was unintentional or the result of some treachery on the part of owners of that unproductive territory, cannot now be determined. The Town expressed its opinion of this matter by de- claring by vote in October, 1771, " that it is a hardship both to the towns and the farms lately laid to it, that they should be annexed, inasmuch as they are in no way accommodated to it and that it is impracticable they should receive privileges that they be not rated." In May, 1772, a Committee was chosen to petition to the General Court " to take off the farms lately annexed " which was done. " A Petition of the Town of Princeton, in the County of Worcester, was presented by their Committee to the General Court at their last Session Shewing that in April, 1 77 1, that Place, which before was a District, was erected in a Town, and all adjoining Lands which belonged to no other Town or District were annexed, unpetitioned for, which brings the Town into a very irregular Form ; a Strip of Land extended to a great Distance from the Center where the Meeting-house stands; that all and every Part of said Lands is nearer and Roads may be made with less Expense to some other Town or District than to Princeton; That the Town is new & almost in its infancy, have been and are necessarily obliged to be at great Expense in finish- ing their Meeting-House and making new Roads; That there are but few Inhabitants on this adjoining Land, all of whom usually attend Public Worship; and before their Union with that Town paid Province Taxes to some other Town and have never paid any there to this day; That the Town of Princeton, in addition to all the Burdens of Settling a minister, building a Meeting-House and making io6 History of Princeton new Roads must expend Hundreds or Thousands of Pounds to make Roads through this Part, of which the Settlers can bear but a very small Proportion; one Road in particular lately laid out from Westminster to Leominster through said land must cost Eighty or hundred Pounds lawful money to make it passable, and people must be called from the middle and extreme Parts of the Town, and thereby be obliged to travel ten or twelve miles to work on said Road; Being subject to so many Difficulties, which in Process of Time may be encreased by causing a Removal of the Meeting-House. They therefore pray the said Lands may be disannexed. Several Inhabitants of the said Lands, join with the above Petitioners, as they can be better accommodated at some other Town or District.^ The petition was granted and an act passed Mch. 6, 1773, by which the bounds of the town became identical with those of the District in 1759. Boundaries. No change in the town lines was made until 18 10, when a tract of some 490 acres in Hubbardston on the westerly side of the town was annexed to Princeton. An attempt made in 1793 by Solomon Rolph and others to accomplish this failed, but in 1809 Abner Allen, Abra- ham Cutting and a few others renewed the petition desiring better accommodations both " civil and Sacred " (Petition dated May 28, 1809) especially in the winter season. They represented that they were located some five and three quarters miles from Hubbardston meeting-house, and that it would be for their decided advantage if the Brattle farm " or Great Farm No, i " was annexed to Princeton, there being a good road to the latter town and the distance to the meeting-house was but two and three quarters miles. Notwithstanding the protest of the town of Hubbardston the act of annexation was passed Feb. 16, 18 10. This tract comprised one of the original divisions of ' Mass. Gazette, Sept. 3, 1772. Incorporation 107 Rutland " North East Quarter." Its addition to Princeton mal<;es the line of the town very noticeable for its irregu- larity. No Town. The annexation of " No Town " to Princeton followed in 1838. By this name a tract of land lying between Fitchburg, Westminster, Leominster and Prince- ton was for many years known. All of this, comprising nearly five thousand acres, was included in one of the plans submitted in 1759 to the General Court at the time the question of incorporation of the town was agitated. In the section relating to Gardner's farms, mention is made of some of the early inhabitants in the westerly part of it. By the act of incorporation in 1771 this whole territory was actually included in Princeton, but in 1773 was set off. In 1837 Commissioners were appointed by the General Court to view all the unincorporated lands in the state and " make arrangements for their incorporation or annexation to the adjoining towns " &c. Their report is printed in Senate Document No. 12 of the year 1838. In relation to this tract it is stated that there were eight dwellings on it " containing in 1831 sixty-four inhabitants, but no mill, school-house or public road, the location, the unevenness of surface and quality of soil is such that its population will never be much increased, and can never possess resources of any kind sufficient for a town." The Com- missioners proposed an equitable division of the tract, by the annexation of 1475 acres to Princeton, 1307 acres to Westminster and the remainder 2100 acres to Leominster. This recommendation was adopted and acts in accordance therewith passed by the Legislature, April 4, 1838. The plans for the whole tract were drawn by Capt. Caleb Dana of Princeton. That portion annexed to Princeton con- tained 1462 acres of which 800 were woodland, and upon the tract there were four dwelling houses and one shingle mill. io8 History of Princeton The line dividing Westminster and Princeton was changed by an act of the Legislature, April 19, 1870, which annexed to this town a small strip of land previously be- longing to Westminster. This was done to accommodate one man, and although the people of this town did not approve of it they unin- tentionally let the bill pass without remonstrance. iUJ/JJ.^Y// CHAPTER VI THE REVEREND THOMAS PRINCE Town Name. It is safe to say that the residents of Princeton have not been familiar with the character, social standing and even greatness of the Rev. Thomas Prince whose name the town bears, and who was in many respects a remarkable man. Birth. Born in Sandwich, Massachusetts, May 15, 1687, he was graduated at Harvard College in 1707. For several years after graduation he travelled extensively abroad, visiting among other places, London, Amsterdam and the Barbadoes. While in London he preached in several churches and was invited by one or more to settle with them, and he did settle at Coombs, but his love for his native land led him to decline all invitations to remain permanently abroad, and in the year 1717 he returned to Boston. The Old South Church. His fame as a preacher had preceded him, and he was at once desired by the members of the Old South Church to become the colleague of the pastor. Rev. Dr. Sewall, and a call resulted in his accept- ance in 1 7 18, and in this relation he remained forty years until his death. It is recorded that in September, 1717, he preached a Thanksgiving Sermon at the " Thursday Lec- ture " in the hearing of " a multitudinous auditory, many belonging to the adjacent towns being present." Ordination. He was ordained Oct. i, 1718, the sermon being preached by Mr. Prince himself and it is said to have been " a wonderful production." Judge Sewall records of this service " Sang the Chariots of God are twenty thousand." " Entertainment was at Dr. Sewall's house, was very plentiful and splendid." (The charge on the Deacons' books for wine used on this occasion was £5,17,3.) 109 no History of Princeton Salary. At the time of the marriage of Mr. Prince to Miss Deborah Denny, Oct. 30, 17 19, the church voted that " Three Pounds five shilHngs per week be allowed and paid to Mr. Thomas Prince our Rev'd Pastor from the time of his marriage." and that " he be desired by the Committee to remove into one of the ministerial houses of the Church as soon as may be." The salary thus voted was not a meager stipend for the time. At first he appears to have occupied the old parsonage which was formerly the residence of Madam Norton and Governor Winthrop. Residences in Boston. In a preface to the second edition of his " Chronology " Mr. Prince refers to a valuable journal of events relating to the Massachusetts Colony " All wrote with the said Governor Winthrop's own hand who deceased in this very house I dwell in." This house was on the main highway, now Washington Street, opposite School Street. It was destroyed and used for firewood by the British troops during the winter of 1775. Mr. and Mrs. Prince afterwards occupied another " Ministerial house " built on Milk Street in the rear of the meeting house. It was probably in this latter house that he died. The church appears to have had at differ- ent periods three or four parsonages. Plan for the Day. Mr. Prince commenced with a well- regulated household, as is shown by a manuscript found among his papers giving his plan for each day's duties, in the carrying out of which it is presumed Deborah ac- quiesced. 1 719 Oct. 30 I marry. We begin to keep house. My proposed order: 1 At 5 get up and go into my Study. 2 Pray and read in the Orig. Bible till 6 and then call up the Family. 3 At 6^ Go to Family Prayers and only the Porringer of Chocolat for Breakfast. The Reverend Thomas Prince iii 4 At 7 go into my study till 12)4 and then do something about the House till i to dinner. 5 Dinner at i. 6 At 2 Dress and go about till Candle Light, Except Wednes- day, after Dinner, do something about the House: Satur- day after Dinner visit Dr. Sewall's till 2]/> and then Home. 7 At Candle Light and Study to 9>4 at 9>4 go to Family Prayers and so to Bed: N. B. I eat no supper. Quality as a Minister. With a pleasing personality he was a favorite with young and old, being in private con- versation both interesting and instructive. He was a tender and faithful pastor and is said by one to have preached as one that felt " the Divine Excellency and importance of the Word of God which he preached to others." During his pastorate there was great religious prosperity. At the time of Whitfield's visit to Boston, he welcomed him and joined and rejoiced in his great work. One notable incident in his pulpit ministrations in 1746 is related. A French fleet consisting of forty ships of war under the Due D'Aulney sailed from Nova Scotia with designs for the destruction of New England. Meanwhile a day of fasting and prayer was appointed to be observed in all the churches, if by any means a gracious Providence in His own chosen way might avert the threatened calamity. While Mr. Prince was officiating on this occasion in his own church, and was in the midst of a fervent prayer for divine interposition, though the day up to that time had been perfectly calm, there came a sudden gust of wind, so violent as to cause a loud clattering of the windows. He instantly paused in his prayer, looked around upon his congregation with a countenance illumined with hope, and then pro- ceeded to ask God that the wind " might frustrate the object of our enemies and be the means of saving our country." A tempest ensued in which the greater part of the French fleet was destroyed. The General commanding surrendered, many died of disease, thousands perished in the ocean, and the enterprise was abandoned. 1 1 2 History of Princeton Literary Ability. Of his literary abilities much has been written, — " his industry was perfectly exhaustive." In early life he showed a marked inclination to collect and preserve historical material, which found its culmination in the preparation and publication of the New Kngland Chronology by which he is perhaps best known, and " than which there is none more valuable." He shared with the Mathers the reputation of being the most learned man in New England in the Eighteenth Century, but surpassed all the Mathers in the method, accuracy and usefulness of his writings. Dr. Chauncey said of him, " He possessed all the intellectual powers in a degree far beyond what is common. I do not know of anyone that had more learning among us, excepting Dr. Cotton Mather." Others say, " an assiduous annalist whose service in perpetuating evidence relating to our early history exceeds all others since the first generation." " Nothing came from his pen that does not now possess historical value. His occasional papers are all luminous with the spirit and life of the time." Publications. In addition to his ordinary pulpit minis- trations he delivered many sermons upon public events, and funeral discourses portraying the life and character of men and women whose memory was worth preserving. It is stated that at least fifty of these public addresses and sermons were printed. Many are found in our libraries to-day. Earthquakes and Lightning Rods. Among other publi- cations Mr. Prince published in 1727 a Sermon entitled " Earth(juakes the Works of Cxod and Tokens of His Just Displeasure," of which in 1755 he issued a reprint with an " appendix concerning the Operation of God in Earth- quakes by means of the Electrical Substance." He was opposed to the use of the lightning rod, regarding all such attempts to c?scape the wrath of the Almighty as question- able devices. His warning against the lightning rod is stated in these words; — "the more points of Iron are erected round the Earth, to draw the Electrical Substance out of the Air, the more the Earth must needs be charged The Reverend Thomas Prince 1 1 3 with it. And therefore it seems worthy of Consideration whether any part of the Earth, l)eing fuller of this terrible Substance, may not be exposed to more shocking Earth- quakes. In Boston are more erected than anywhere else in New England; and Boston seems to be more dreadfully Shaken, — O, there is no getting out of the mighty Hand of God. If we still think to avoid it in the Air we cannot in the Earth; yea, it may grow more fatal." (Extract from " The Old Farmer and his Almanac," page 301.) Prof. John Winthrop published a pamphlet taking issue with Mr. Prince and severely criticizing his statement. Psalms. Mr. Prince also prepared a revision of the New England version of the Psalms which was used for the first time by the Old South Church on the Sabbath following his death. Rutland Lands. The first evidence discovered of Mr. Prince's interest in Rutland lands is shown in a conveyance to him by the heirs of Cyprian Stevens, in the year 1727, for £120 current money, of one-half of a share, that is, one sixty-sixth part of the tract known as the Township of Rut- land, which originally was twelve miles square, or 92,160 acres. Six miles square had been set off for the town of Rutland with some other concessions or grants. This deed was not recorded until the year 1734. (In examination of old deeds one finds evidence that often the recording is delayed until some one is ready to go to the shire town, and then perhaps half a dozen deeds will be entered for record the same day from the same locality.) Mr. Prince was one of the ten signers of a call issued Oct. 4, 1733. This was published in a Boston paper. The meeting was held Nov. 7 in Boston at the Royal Exchange Tavern on King St. At this meeting thirteen persons were present including Mr. Prince. Among the number were prominent business men of Boston, many of them members or attendants at the Old South Church. Such names appear as Penn Townsend, Adam Winthrop, PVancis Brinley, John Jeffries, Thomas Fitch and Jonas Clark. Of the eleven and one- 114 History of Princeton half shares represented at the meeting Mr. Prince was credited with three shares (or one-eleventh of the whole) and his share of the tax subsequently levied was 3o£. Nothing appears in print or among the few remaining Prince Manuscripts to suggest what led him to purchase so large an interest in this tract of land, as there was no present, or seemingly prospective, value to the larger part of it. But he certainly could not be called a " promoter " in the modern use of the word, as he retained his holdings, and at the time of his death is said to have possessed some three thousand acres all together. There is no evidence that he realized any financial gain from his possessions, nor did his widow or daughter profit much thereby. Among his associates Mr. Prince quickly assumed a prominent place, and it was not long before he was engaged in plotting out the divisions of the tract, — East and West Wings, North West Quarter, North East Quarter. At least one of these plans bearing the signature of Mr. Prince and the Committee of the Proprietors has been preserved. The original plan of the East W^ing long ago disappeared, but fortunately a small copy was found by the writer a few years ago among papers at Rutland. Although not the Clerk of the Proprietors nor their Treasurer, there is evidence that he performed a part, if not the principal part, of the duties of both these officers. One can trace his probable route as he left his home in Boston for one of his trips to the interior. He would pass perhaps through Cambridge and Waltham to Sudbury where he could greet his brother minister and perhaps be entertained over night. In the morning he would follow the old travelled road to Lancaster, at that period a fre- quently used country road. At Lancaster he would find another brother in the ministry, a college friend whose entertainment he might prefer to the inn. From Lancaster he would pass through Chocksett, now Sterling, then into the path used by occasional travellers in that direction. By this time he would find dwellings few and far between, especially when he reached the area now included in our The Reverend Thomas Prince 115 town.^ From this point doubtless the road was very rough and as there was no settlement or even occasional houses he had to depend upon his own resources for rest and refreshment. If he desired to survey his own possessions in Lot A which included a part of Little Wachusett, the prospect must certainly have been discouraging. Gift for Services. The proprietors recognized the value of Mr. Prince's services and in 1734 voted " that 63 acres on the Southerly part of the 'J2 acres of land in Lot A, not having been set off to any of the proprietors by reason of the Brokenness of it be granted to the Rev. Thos. Prince in consideration of the great care and labour he had taken in conveyancing divisions above named." In the prosecu- tion of this work he must frequently have taken a journey alone or accompanied by a Surveyor or one of the pro- prietors. Death. The last meeting of the Proprietors attended by Mr. Prince was held on the 15th of August, 1758. After a long illness during which he said he was " weary of this life " he passed away on Sunday, Oct. 22, 1758. ^ His last prayer is reported as being a petition " that an open and abundant entrance might be ministered to him into God's heavenly kingdom." Mr. Prince was doubtless buried in a tomb in the Granary Burial Ground, — a tomb belonging to the Old South Church, — and a marker at this spot now bears his name. The preamble to his will, dictated of course by himself, shows the greatness of his faith, and is worthy of being put into print. ' There was no tavern in this locality until 1742 when one was established on what is now called the Houghton Road. This spot is now marked by a boulder. 2 "The Old South Church," by Hill, Vol. 2 : 40. Sunday between five and six o'clock in the afternoon, the Rev'd Mr. Prince departed this life after a month's languishment to the inexpressible sorrow of his Church and Congregation over whom he had been ordained pastor forty years the 1st. day of the month on which he died, which was Oct. 22, 1758, his funeral was attended the Saturday following at the expense of his Church, who have a just sense of his worth and of their own irreparable loss in his death. {Fleet.) ii6 History of Princeton Preamble to Will. " First and primarily I do hereby commit both my soul and body into the merciful hands of God my Creator preserver, continual benefactor and redeemer (trusting) that of his infinite goodness through Christ he will forgive me save me make my imperfect spirit perfect in holiness receive it to Glory in the day of Christ's second appearance and raise my body, form it a perfect and glorious structure, unite my body and soul again and acquit and justify me in the public judg- ment and then carry me up to live with Him in Heaven forever." The will devises his real estate to his wife and daughter Sarah who afterwards married Moses Gill. (His only son Thomas had previously died a young man. He had how- ever given evidence of marked literary ability.) Lands in Boston, Plymouth Co., Worcester Co., Hamp- shire Co., besides those in the several divisions of Rutland district are named. A portion of this had been given to him, and probably some tracts came through his wife's family, but he purchased the larger portion of it, and his sales were few indeed. Unfortunately no inventory of the estate appears on record or on file. Certainly a record of his personal property would be extremely interesting today. The property left by his father may have enabled him to gratify his desire to acquire real estate, and also to publish so much historical and religious matter. There is a portrait of Prince in the Massachusetts Historical Society and a replica is with the American Antiquarian Society of Worcester.^ P. Pelham fecit. Thomas Prince, A. M./ Quintus Eclesiae Australis Bos- tonii Novangelorum Pastor E. Collegii Harvardini/ Canto- brigiae Curatoribus, Samuelis Armigeni Fileus et Thomas A. M. denoti Pater/ Painted for and sold by J. Buck at the Spectacles in Queen St., Boston. ^ J no. Greenwood Pinx. The Reverend Thomas Prince 117 Translation John Greenwood painted (it) P. Pelham made (it) Thomas Prince A. M. Fifth pastor of the South Church of Boston of New England, one of the Trustees of Harvard College at Cambridge, son of Samuel Esq. and father of Thomas Master of Arts deceased. Prince Library. We are indebted to Mr. Prince not only for his historical writings which furnish the basis for much of our local history in New England, but also for the invaluable collection of books, pamphlets, and MSS, which he bequeathed to the South Church, and which will stand for all time as a monument to his name and scholarship. This collection he began to form even in his boyhood. One book shows that it was given to him by his mother in 1697, when he was ten years old; another bears date of possession, Harwich, 1701. The purpose to collect seems to have become a settled one with him upon his entering college in 1703, his object being the illustration of the history of New England. It was, therefore, at the time of his matriculation in the sixteenth year of his age, that Prince systematically laid the foundation of a collection of books and manuscripts, a large share of which relate to the civil and religious history of New England, and which, with unfailing zeal and under the most favorable circumstances, in this country and in Europe, he cherished and enriched during his long life. At the time of his death the New England Library (as he called it), we may well believe, was the most extensive of its kind that had ever been formed. During the period of our Colonial history, the Mather family and Governor Hutchin- son are alone to be compared with Prince as collectors of books and manuscripts. Their labors in this direction avail us little now, for the governor's collection was scat- tered by a mob, while the Mather' has been gradually dispersed.' • From Introduction to Cat. of Prince Library, pub. by City of Boston in 1870. Il8 History of Princeton The large collection of books, maps and plans which he left by will to the Old South Church was sadly depleted during the days of the Revolution, when the British soldiers occupied the meeting house where the collections were stored, many of them in the steeple chamber. Fortunately some were saved and are now in the Boston Public Library. A catalogue of these has been published and is interesting to examine, while the books themselves cause one to feel that he is in the very presence of Mr. Prince. Other valuable historical material is held by the Massachusetts Historical Society. Prof. Tyler says of him: — " He had prepared himself for the public service by diligent study at home, and by eight years of observation abroad ; he was a man of most tolerant and brotherly spirit; his days were filled by gentle and gracious and laborious deeds; he was a great scholar; he magnified his office and edified the brethren by publishing a large number of judicious and nutritious sermons; ... he took a special interest in physical science, and formed quite definite opinions about earthquakes, comets, ' the electrical substance,' and so forth. " For all these things he was deeply honored in his own time, and would have been deeply forgotten in ours had he not added to them very unique performances as a historian. No American writer before Thomas Prince qualified himself for the service of history by so much conscientious and specific preparation; and though others did more work in that service, none did better work than he." Lord's Day, Nov. 12, 1758. The Church stay'd and voted, That the Pastor and Deacons with the Hon. Andrew Oliver, Esq. (then the secretary of the province) be a committee to receive the Books, &c. bequeathed to this Church by our late Pastor, the Rev'd Mr. Thomas Prince, in his last Will. Joseph Sewall. The Reverend Thomas Prince 119 This will was dated Oct. 2, twenty days before his death. He provides for the manufacture of a sacramental cup for the Church, and he gives his Hebrew Bible in two volumes, and his Greek Testament to his colleague. He then disposes of his library in two parts, his books in Latin, Greek, and the Oriental languages to be kept for the use of the ministers of the church; and the collection which he designates as the New England Library to be preserved apart and intact as a reference library, under the control of the pastors and deacons of the Church. This collection was in the " steeple Chamber " which he had probably used as his study, and here it remained for many years. The vicissitudes through which it has passed are too painful to contemplate. It undoubtedly suffered severely during the British occupation of the town and desecration of the meeting-house. It afterwards suffered from the neglect and from a want of appreciation on the part of its custodians of its intrinsic value. Many of its treasures have drifted away from it and are now among the chief attractions of other collections; but despoiled as it has been by time. It is a splendid fragment, and as such, under existing arrangements for its care and preservation, it Is now safe. " As Michael Angelo, in his blind old age, was led to the * Torso Belvedere ' In the Vatican, that he might pass his hands over it, and enjoy through touch the grandeur of its lines, so will scholars come and continue to come from all parts of the land to what remains of the New England Library, that they may gather knowledge and inspiration from its treasures." Life's Work. Forty years before, when entering upon his ministry in Boston, Mr. Prince preached from the words of the Psalmist: " But I will hope continually, and will yet praise thee more and more. My mouth shall show forth thy righteousness and thy salvation all the day, for I know not the numbers thereof, I will go Into the strength of the Lord God: I will make mention of thy righteousness, even of thine only, O God, thou hast taught me from my youth; 120 History oj Princeton and hitherto have I declared thy wondrous works." Psalm LXXI, 14-17. He was, in the strength of his early manhood, just installed in a position of commanding influence, and with a career of honor and usefulness, bright with promise, yet of course all uncertain, lying before him. Could he have preached a sermon to his people in his declining years in anticipation of the close at no distant day of his pastoral work among them, he might well have made reference to that first sermon, and then have taken for his text the remainder of the passage, which would have been inappro- priate in 1 7 18, but most appropriate in 1758: " Now also, when I am old and grey headed, O God, forsake me not, until I have showed thy strength unto this generation and thy power to every one that is to come." Of the value of Mr. Prince's historical labors we have this estimate by another writer whose attainments and sympathies made him a competent judge: " The 22d of Oct. (1758) will be remembered as a re- markable day in the history of the town, and not only of Boston, but of New England; for in that day died the Rev. Thomas Prince, a benefactor to his country; leaving a name which will be venerated to the remotest ages, if literature shall then be valued; a name which may with pride be emulated by the inquirers after historical knowl- edge, and the admirers of precision and accuracy in the paths of history." ^ 1 Hist. Am. Literature, Vol. ii, p. 144; Drake's Hist, and Antiq., p. 646. NOTES New England Magazine, '86, Vol. 4 : 347; New England Library and its Founder by Victoria Reed. The Boston Library contains, on its depleted state, 1500 books and tracts relating to America during the period of our colonial history. It also gives an excellent account of his life, his character as a minister, and refers to his children — three daughters and one son. In the Boylston Mansion is a beautiful portrait of Mrs. Sarah Gill, his daughter. A tall clock that he prized is the property' of Mrs. Addison Denny of Leicester. The Reverend Thomas Prince 121 The Hinckley papers tell of his grandmother as being a beautiful woman and exceptional in other ways. Deborah Denny grew up in England as a child under his ministrations. She came to New England to live with her brother on the same boat by which Mr. Prince returned to his native land. She was ten years his junior. Two years later he married her. It is hoped that some benefactor will present a portrait of Mr. Prince to the town. CHAPTER VII ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY First Difficulties. The earliest inhabitants of Prince- ton were dependent for privileges of public worship upon the neighboring towns of Rutland, Holden, Lancaster and Westminster. But the many miles of travel over roads imperfect in construction and often impassable from the snows of winter and the mud of springtime, prevented regular attendance, and those whose hearts yearned for their accustomed privileges were obliged to content them- selves by their own firesides. Meetings at Private Houses. As the population in- creased and facilities for travel improved, it became feasible for a few families to gather together in some private house where a religious service was held, with occasionally a sermon. At one time one room in the tavern of Abijah Moore furnished sufficient accommodation for the audience assembled to hear the preaching of the Word. The attendance was never large, and the Sabbaths thus occupied were few in number and only during the summer season, but the number of these gatherings was gradually in- creased, extending over several months of the most favor- able season. Mr. Harrington's Sermon. Of the character of the services, the preaching, the attendance, no record remains. The people came, received the Word with gladness and departed to their homes. Some rode on horseback, others walked and in some cases through mere paths guided by marked trees or familiar objects by the way. One sermon preached the Sunday before the first town-meeting and published at the expense of the people of Princeton district by Rev. Timothy Harrington of Lancaster at the tavern of Abijah Moore to " a handful of us who found our way to peaceable Temper, and Condu^J: divinely enjoined. inni /iy DISCOURSE Delivered at Princetowx, On Deamber 23d 1759. By Timothy Harrington^ A. Paftor of the Firft Church in Lantafler, If it ht poSible^ iive peaceablj 'mith all Men,— Ap«fUc PAUt. Lit there h no Str'tfn betikeen thee^ aTtd «?, I pray ihce, for ow ar^ Bttthrtn. Patriarch Abraham. BthUd hov} good, and hvm plcafant it if, for Brethren /» d'-Jiell to gtihtr in Unity, Thert ths Lord commandeth the BUfing. KingDAvio. ByCtncordfmallThingtincreaff, ^ ' Dutch Motto, M.DCCLX. /: To the Inhabitants of Princetmn^ HIS pifcQurfe, pub- liihed at their Requeft and Expence, is now in- fcribed. And that the di- vine Bleffing may attend it, and reft on that infant Society, is thefincerePrayer pf their affured Friend. The Author. ?v