£V5^ i \ -'^M^^^ L I B K II T Y AND UNION! SPEECHES I»EL1VERED AT THE EIGHTEENTH AV A R D REPUBLICAN FESTIVAL, IN COMMEMORATION OF THE BIRTH OF WASHINGTON HELD AT THE GRAMERCY PARK HOUSE, NEW YORK, FEBRUARY 22, 1800. Reported Phonogkaphicallt by .V^Tilmam Anderson. NEW YORK: BAKER ct f; O I) W 1 \ . PRINT E R S PRWriNG-IlOUSK SQDARE, OPPOSITE CITY HALL, 1860. SPEECHES DELIVEKED AT THE EIGHTEENTH WARD REPUBLICAIi FESTIYAL, IN COMMEMORATION OF THE BIRTH OF WA S H I :N^ G T Is^, ih:ld at the gra:meecy park house, NEW YORK, FEBRUARY 22, 1S60. % Heposted Phonooraphicallt by V/illiam Anderson. NEW YORK: • 4 BAKER & GODWIN, PRINTERS, PEINTING-HOITSE SQUARE, OPrOSITE CITY HAI-T,. 1860. ' i, *U k eiiJi # J i V ^ PROCEEDINGS. The EiGHTERNxn "Ward Republican Association commemorated the birtli of Washington by a public festival at the Gramercy Park House, on Wednesday evening, February 22d, 1860. At 8 o'clock, the members of the Association and the invited guests proceeded to the dining saloon, where a sumptuous repast -was provided. Elliot C. Cowdin, Esq., Chairman of the Committee of Arrangements, presided, while Job L. Black, Esq., President of the Association, and Wm. K. Strong, Esq., occupied seats at the head of the tables on either side of the President, supported at the opposite ends by Messrs. James M. Cross, Jas. M. Thomson, and J. Austin Stevens, Jr. Rev, Dr. Bellows, in a very appropriate prayer, invoked the Divine blessing upon the assemblage and upon the cause of liberty ; after which, the company partook of the bountiful provision that had been made for the gratification of their alimentive desires. Having spent an agreeable hour in discoursing the bill of fare, the cloth was removed and the intellectual programme was presented by — The President, who, in announcing the regular toasts, addressed the com- pany as follows : SPEECH OF ELLIOT C. COWDIN, Esq. Fellow Republicans: — In assuming the duties of tlie post which the un- merited partiality of the Committee of Arrangements has assigned me, I claim your generous indulgence. While I am not insensible of the honor, I know full well that there are many, very many, of my fellow Republicans of the Eighteenth Ward, better qualified to discharge the duties of this occasion, but there is no one more ear- nestly devoted to the noble cause which has brought us together. (Applause.) We are here as neighbors and friends, to interchange friendly and social salutations, and to declare anew our unalterable attachment to the principles of the Fathers of the Republic. We are assembled as Republicans, to rejoice together with exceeding joy, that, after a well-fought battle, a signal victory has been won by the Represen- tatives of the nation, and that the Banner of the Constitution is again planted on the walls of the Capitol. (Loud cheers.) We meet to commemorate the birthday of the pure and noble Washington — that hero, sage, and patriot, " whom Providence left childless that a nation might call him Father." Other heroes have won more brilliant battles; but none have closed so glo- rious a career. Others have fought to enslave ; he to give freedom. Others fousrht for power or a kingdom ; he for Independence, and no other throne than tbe'hearts of his countrymen. (Loud applause.) Amid the darkness of the Revolution, he exclaimed, "I see my duty, — that of standing up for the liberties of my country; I dare not shrink fron:v it; and I rely on that Being who has not left to us the choice of duties, that while I shall conscientiously discharge mine, I shall not finally lose my reward." How nobly were those duties pprformed ! And after a life of unparalleled devotion and sacrifice in the public service, what a priceless legacy he has left us in his parting counsels ! He earnestly charged the people to be united, and to preserve "the unity of government which constitutes us one people," as "a main pillar in the edi- fice of your real independence, the support of your tranquillity at home, your peace abroad, of your safety, of your prosperity, of that very liberty which you so highly prize." To discountenance " whatever may suggest even a sus- picion that the Union can in any event be abandoned ;" to " observe good faith and justice towards all nations ; cultivate peace and harmony with all ;" to dis- claim, "as matter of serious concern," all "geographical discriminations." He declared that " the Constitution, which at any time exists, till changed by the whole people, is sacredly obligatory upon all," and that " all obstructions to the execution of the laws * * * are destructive to this fundamental principle, and of fatal tendency," As for slavery, none deplored it more than Washington. (Cheers.) He proclaimed that it was among his " first wishes to see some plan adopted by which slavery in this country may be abolished by law." But the idea of extending it — of dincriminatinci in favor of that one particular gcogrm2)hical and sectional interest, was never for a moment entertained ; he stood where all the statesmen and patriots of the Kevolution stood, uncompromisingly on the side of freedom. Gentlemen, on this day, at least, it is well to pause and reflect on his words of wdsdom and candor. . Let them be engraven on our memories. Let them Avarm our hearts, excite our patriotism, and strengthen our hopes for the great Battle of Liberty and Union that is before us. (Prolonged cheering.) Be of o'ood cheer. A voice of encouragement comes to us from the plains of Kansas, exclaiming in trumpet tones : "Easier were it To hurl the rooted mountain from its base. Than force the yoke of slavery uj^ou men Determiued to be free." (Renewed applause.) Fellow Republicans, our duties are plain ; let us meet them like men. There can be no doubt that the great majority of the people are opposed, utterly and irreconcilably opposed, to slave aggression. Let us, then, unite in a spirit of justice and fraternity, and put an end to oppression and misrule, " The time was," said Lord Chatham in the British Parliament, " when I was content to see France brought to her knees ; now I wish to see her laid on her back." Can we say less of the minions of Slaveocracy ? Already we have brought them to their knees, by the choice of a Republican Speaker (Loud cheers) ; and by the blessing of God, in November next, we will lay them on tlieir backs, by tbe triumpliant election of a Republican President. (Enthusiastic cheering.) To effect this, let Union, Union, Union, be our watch-word. A union among Republicans, and a union with all who are opposed to Federal corrup- t'on and misgovernraent ; opposed to forcing slavery upon the national Terri- tories to the exclusion of the laboring white man ; opposed to robbing weak and defenseless neighboring nations of their territories, over which to spread the blight of human slavery ; opposed to latter-day iJemocracy out-and-out, in all its forms. (Loud cheers.) With such men, I say, let us unite, in a spirit of just conciliation, with " principles — not men " for our guide, and the good of our common country our sole aim. The wild fire of fanaticism on the one hand, and violence, menace, and di>union on the other, are but as passing clouds in the serene and everlasting heavens. Be not dismayed. Planting ourselves firmly on the Constitution and the Laws of the land, Avith the light of the principles of the Declaration of Independence to illumine our path, and the example of tlie fathers of the Re- public to direct our steps, let us go forth without fear, and with manly hearts. " Let our noble motto be, God — the Country — Liberty ; Planted on religion's rock, Thou shalt stand in every shock. Laugh at danger far and near, Spurn at baseness, spurn at fear ; Still with persevering might, Speak the truth, and do the right." The President resumed his seat amid great applause. The first regular toast — " Our Country, Our Whole Country, and nothing hut our Country,''^ was drunk with a hearty good-will, Dodworth's band playing " Yaidcee Doodle.'" The chairman said, the second regular toast was one which appealed to their patriotic feelings, and he trusted it would be received with all the honors. " The President of (he United States^ Music, — "The Star Spangled Banner." The President said he held in his hand a letter from the third highest officer in the United States, our Rejnihlican Speaker of the House of Represen- tatives ; which was the signal for loud and long-continued cheering. He read the subjoined letter. LETTER FROM SPEAKER PENNINGTON. HousK OF Representatives, Washington, Feb. 14, 1860. Dear Sir: — I received your very kind invitation, as Chairman of your Committee, to attend a meeting of the Republicans of the Eighteenth Ward of the city of Nev/ York, on the 22d inst. While it would be a source of great pleasure could I be with you at that time, you perceive my pressing duties here entirely forbid it. While I do not think any man is called upon to surrender principle to 6 expediency, yet there are occasions, and tLat time is now with us, when all sound and patriotic citizens should exercise calmness and moderation, and avoid, as far as practicable, every unupcessary excitement. The perpetuity of the Union should be inscribed on every banner, and never yielded but in the last extremity. For myself, I have no fears, depending as I do on that love of country which pervades our people. As our institutions were established for us by wise and noble ancestors, it would seem a sad event if we could not preserve so valuable an inheritance. Have no fears, our coun- try will yet remain one people. I beg to ofi'er you my best thanks for your invitation, with the fullowing sentiment : Our Country and her Free Institutions — May our Union be perpetual t Very respectfully. Your ob'dient servant, WM. PENNINGTOX. Elliot C. Cowdin, Esq., Chairman, &c., servance by others. It is obligatory upon them as well as upon ourselves ; and we are met here to-night for the purpose of rebuking disunion and everything which tends to disunion, whether it be here or whether it be elsewhere : and while we are determined to observe and to have others observe, all the compromises of the Constitution, we do not desire, in the slight- est degree to interfere Avith any of the domestic institutions of the South. As the distinguished gentleman who has preceded me has said, with the internal condition of the States, v/holher it be in respect of slaves or in respect of any- 21 tbing else, we disavow the right to interfere. We disavow any autliority on the part of anybody but the people of the States themselves, to interfere ; and what is more, Sir, we will aid — if there be domestic insurrection, or if there be violence from abroad, from whatever quarter it may come — we will aid, with all the powers of the Constitution, and with all the appliances of the State govern- ment, in putting down everything which may disturb the tranquillity of any State or any territory. (Applause.) Yes, Sir, we go further than this. We ■will observe, with a fidelity which knows no abatement or reserve — we will ob- serve, as citizens and as politicians, not only the statutes of Congress, which may be properly passed upon subjects over which they have proper jurisdiction ; but we will observe also, the decisions of the Supreme Court, where they are delib- erately pronounced upon matters in judgment and necessary to the decision of the particular question pending, in regard to which that tribunal has exclusive authority. (Applause.) We will observe them with the same fidelity that we would obey our own statutes or the decisions of the highest tribunal in our own State. But, Sir, we require that those decisions should be properly pro- nounced, upon matters necessarily in judgment, and that there should not be any extra-judicial opinions — whether designed or not, we care not — any extrajudi- cial opinions, got up for political purposes to aid a political party, and attempted to be forced upon us contrary to the well-settled rule which prevails in cas-es of that description. In other words, we respect and obey the tribunal in the exercise of all its legitimate functions, as we do in resj^ect of our own judicial tribunals ; if it goes beyond that, we do what the State of Georgia did ; we do what General Jackson did ; we do what other States at the ^outh have done, — in declaring that when that tribunal steps beyond its proper boundaries under the Constitution, its decisions are not binding upon us, and we will seek their reversal and overthrow. I wish to be understood, however, that this is to be done in a lawful, peaceable, constitutional way — not by disregarding even an extra-judicial decision, but by presenting the question again to the Court, as we have a right to present it, and as I hope a distinguished gentleman who has just addressed you [Mr. Evarts] will hereafter be able to present one case which has greatly agitated the country ; so that the Court, upon a deliberate review of its judgment, will pronounce it to be erroneous, and declare, that the Constitution of the United States is a constitution for liberty, and not a constitution for the propagation, extension, and perpetuation of slavery, ((^reat cheering.) In other words, what the Republican party proposes to do is to be done lawfully, under the Constitution ; by force of persuasion and argument, by the operation of deliberate conviction peaceably produced, and not by violence or outrage, or by a wanton disregard of the decisions of the Court. Further, we do not pro- pose, in the event of the election of a President who does not suit us, whose political opinions do not agree with our own, to dissolve the Union. We leave that matter entirely for our Southern brethren. (Laughter.) We believe, and act upon the belief, that any man elected according to the provisions of the Constitution — fairly elected — without fraud, without vio- lence, is entitled to be President of the United States for his whole term. (Ap- plause.) We do not agree with the doctrine of Gov. Wise, or the doctrine imputed to him, that if a President is elected whom the South does not admire, they will march to Washington and prevent his inauguration. I should like to see that operation tried with a Northern President. (Voices — So would I.) I should like to see it tried ; and I hope the Republican party will put these proud boasters in a way to try it. (Cheers.) I think that the patriotic hordes of the 22 North would march to Washington, and that those who came there to effect so ignoble and so treasonable an object, would show less courage even than was exhibited during the war of 1812, at Bladensburg. Now, while we observe all these guarantees, while we mean to follow all the compromises of the Constitution, implicitly ; the people at the South must understand, that we will do so in the full exercise of our own opinions upon all subjects having a connection with civil liberty and with the ultimate progress of this country, in social advancement and in Christian civilization. (Voices — " Good," and applause.) We allow them to entertain just such opinions as they please, to express them here if they please, upon all these subjects ; to keep their domestic institu- tions to themselves, so that they may not interfere with us and with our rights of conscience ; but, at the same time, we claim for ourselves — and we will have for ourselves — the right of private judgment ; and we will exercise our conscien- tious convictions upon any and every subject within the scope of our civil insti- tutions, as understood by the Fathers of the Republic. (Cheers.) We maintain that there shall be no fettering of our consciences : no pad- locking of our lips, will be tolerated. ("No, no," and bravo.) We will not, of course, speak our sentiments so as to create or incite domestic insurrection ; but here, at the North, we will speak, we will write, we will think as we choose upon all these subjects. (Prolonged applause.) And if it be expected that the Union is to be preserved at the sacrifice of any of these rights, the sooner our Southern brethren undeceive themselves the better. I do not apprehend any diflSculty upon that subject. (Voices — Nor I eitber.) 1 do nut apprehend that in the event of the election of a Republican President there will be any difficulty. It will be marvelous how pleasantly things will settle down when that is accomplished. (Voices — That's so.) It has always b*^en so. And so far as I am concerned ; so far as the Republi- can party is concerned, in my judgment, if we should be defeated in the next canvass — if they should elect Stephen A. Douglas, or Jefferson Davis, or Gov. Wise, or even Judas Iscariot or Barrabas — we will sustain the Union ; and we will try ao-aiu the next time, and we will enthrone a Republican President in the Gapitol as sure as time progresses. (Protracted and loud cheers.) More- over, if it be expected that we are to adopt the doctrine recently promulgated in high quarters, that slavery is the normal condition of the black race, that it is a Divine Institution, that it has the power and right of missionary benevol- ence to sustain it ; if we are to sustain that doctrine ; if that is to be forced upon us as American citizens, we shall see what will be the sad result. It is lamentable that after one encroachment upon another has been made upon the principles of freedom, that this new dogma is also added to the list of enormi- ties. It is substantially proclaimed by the highest judicial authority of the gen- eral government. It is proclaimed in the city of New York, and I fek indigna- tion and shame, that such sentiments promulgated in the city of New York, at a largo public meeting, held for the laudable purpose of saving a Union which ■was in no danger, should not have been instantly met with universal disappro- bation. (Applause.) Why, Sir, it is going back three centuries in the race of civilization. (Renewed applause.) It is returning to the dark ages, and to the darkest period of the dark ages. (Voices — That's so.) It is an insult to an intelli- gent, civilized, and Christian community, to ask them to believe it, and to sanction such a doctrine in order to appease their Southern brethren and induce a greater love for their domestic institutions. Let them keep these institutions if they ■will, but never at the expense of our consciences. Let us entertain our own 23 opinions ; let us express them on all proper occasions ; for we cannot, we never will, surrender our right to advance our own sentiments — sentiments character- istic of the civilization of the age in Avhich wc live and alike creditable to our humanity and our manhood. Now, I maintain, Sir, that it was the design and understanding of the framers of the Constitution, that slavery should cease by the gradual operation of laws to be passed by the several States in which it existed at the time of its formation. That sentiment is found in the speeches, in the public newspapers, in every source of information to which we can resort for the opinions which prevailed at that day. It is found, indeed, in the Constitution itself, because, after twenty years, the importation of slaves was expressly.forbidden, in order to prevent their increase. We at the Norih have observed that imidied stipula- tion. We hav^e observed it because slavery was wrong in itself, injurious to the best interests of the country, destructive of the progress of freedom, and a viola- tion of the spirit of the instrument ; and especially of the Declaration of Independ- ence, out of which that instrument grew ; and it has not been till lately that the Southern people have maintained a contrary doctrine, and insisted that slavery not only existed in the States under the Constitution, but was carried by it into the Territories. Now, is it carried into the Territories by the Constitution of the United States ? I maintain that it is not ; and while I shall not go into the legal argument upon that subject, I will state some views that seem to me to have an important bearing upon it. It is said to have been decided iu the Dred Scott case, that slavery does exist in the Territories in viitue of the Constitution of the United States ; but, as I have already intimated, that was not a binding judgment; the point not being necessarily before the court. It was so declared at the time by several of the judges. I believe the court will review that obiter dictum, and come to a different conclusion. That decision, however, goes upon the ground that the spirit of the instrument sanctions slavery, and that it protects slaves as property, because fugitive slaves are re- quired to be surrendered. It is conceded that there is no express provision upon the subject. It is claimed as incidentally inferable because property in slaves is substantially protected ; so that the remark has been well made that the only property protected or recognized by the Constitution of the United States, is property in patents and in Negroes. (Laughter.) It is not pretended by the advocates of the doctrine, that slavery is carried thereby any express provision of the Cons-titution, or that it is established there by the Constitution, but that it attaches as an incident to a slave taken by his owner (the slave being property) into a Territory ; and then the power is de- nied, not only to Congress but to the Legislature of the Territory to pro- hibit or establish slavery ; and you are aware that in the Territory of Ne- braska, a bill abolishing slavery has been vetoed by the Territorial Governor, and tliat Governor is retained in office by the President, because his veto re-echoes substantially the sentiments of the President. Suppose, then, we concede, that a slave is property, and that he is so in virtue of the law of the particular State in which he is held in bondage. There is no common law authorizing slavery. The common law of England, which is our common law, is against it. Cowper said, a long time ago, " Slaves cannot breathe in England, They touch our country and their shackles fall." It is a rule of law, also, that colonists when they go from a particular country into a territory of the parent State, carry with them the common law of the country whence they depart. There is no common law of the United 24 States ; no statute law of the United States regulating slavery, or any of our domestic institutions ; not even of the domestic relations of parent, child, guardian, or ward, or any thing of that kind. Wbat sort of law, then, do our colonists carry with them when they go from a State into a territory where there is no organized law ? Why, of course, they carry with them the general principles of ttie common law, that English law which is ia favor of freedom, ■which does not recognize slavery ; and when they take a slave therefore as pi'op- erty, he is not held in slavery in the Territory under any territorial law, because there is none, nor under any common law, because there is none ; but as the court has said, he is held in virtue of the biw of the State from whence he is taken. But this cannot be. We all know that a law cannot operate extra-ter- ritorially ; so that there cannot be any legalized slavery, growing out of any positive institution or positive state of the law in a Territory, for there is none. Then it attaches to him, as the court has said, because it is incidental ; because beino- a slave in the State from whence he was taken, therefore he is a slave in the State to which he is taken, or any territory to which he is taken. Well now, let us try that argument in another form. I fear I am wearjdng you ; (loud cries of " No, no, go on ") but if you will listen to me for a few moments, I will end this discussion. Suppose we concede that this is one of the compromises of the Constitution, that a slave may be taken into a Territory as property. It is also one of the compromises of the Constitution that a man may go from a free State and hold ■whatever property he has, and exercise whatever rights he possesses, precisely the same as the slave-holder may go from a slave State with his slave. The rights of each are equal — neither is exclusive. And is it possible that the Constitution of the United States protects the slave-holder alone, and does not protect the free Avhite man when he goes there. Why, what does the free white man carry with him ? lie carries with him, first, a conscience that does not tolerate slavery (good) — an educated conscience, that does not tolerate slavery. It is his property, just as much as the slave is the property of the slave-owner. It is more, it is a trust delegated to him by his Maker, which he is not permitted to abuse or pervert. And yet, if a slave-holder may go there with his property thus, and thus onh^, establishing slavery, and preventing the exercise of the rights of conscience of the free white man, who goes there ■with a freedom- loving conscience, where is the toleration that the Constitution of the United States furnishes ? Where their equality of rights under the Constitution ? Why, he cannot speak upon the subject of slavery; he cannot print any thing upon the subject of slavery; he cannot do any thing that is displeasing to the slave-holder, without being in danger of a summary tribunal which executes justice or vengeance, without trial and against law. Take another instance : He takes with him a printing press and printing materials ; he carries vrith him a firm determination to advocate civil freedom for all, and religious liberty ; he is forbidden by the very atmosphere which sur- rounds him, if slavery is tolernted there, from using that printing press, from publishing his sentiments, from exercising the dearest rights which, have ever been conferred upon human beings, and all this because the Constitution of the United States only permits property in slaves. And where, then, is the equality for ■which our Southern friends so much clamor? and where is the regard for the rights of Nonhern men, of Northern sentiment ? and above all, where are the rights of the laboring man, the poor laboring man, the foreign emigrant? Who doubts that but for slavery he ■would seek our wide and beautiful ter- ritories, populate them, and make them free, republican, freedom-loving States^ (Cheers.) They cannot, they will not be such, if slavery imprints its deadly si stain upon them. The home-seeking laborer is turned away from them, and they are given up to the dominion of the slave-owner, the slave-driver, and to the many evils which inevitably follow in the train of slavery. In truth, its exis- tence is a practical exclusion of emigrants from the free States. I deny, there- fore, that there is any thing in the Constitution of the United States, which pro- tects slavery in the Territories simply because the condition of slavery attached to a person in the place from whence he was taken. I say it does not, because maintaining that doctrine is subversive of the rights of Northern men, of free men, of fi'ee labor, of the proper advance of civilization, and of the spirit of the Constitution. (Applause.) How, then, are we to advance the sentiments, the principles, which we maintain ? It is by a firm, consistent, straightforward course, interfering in no respect with the rights of Southern men, and demanding that they shall not in the slightest degree interfere with our own, and by going forward to success if it may be, or to defeat if it may be, under our own chosen leaders — not any half-way leader, not any man of doubtful sentiments, not any man who may be against us the moment he is inaugurated, and of whose antecedents we have very little knowledge. Let us take a representative man (applause), one long identified with us. There are enough of them ; able, distinguished, honest men ; let us take one of them, and as sure as time advances, the strong spirit, the earnest will and the honest efforts of the republican party, will succeed. (Cheers.) It may not be immediately. I think it will be immediately, but it may not be. "We can live, and trust, and hope. I should as soon think of taking a feeble man, a man little known to us, for our candidate, as those who rose at the bid- ding of Peter the Hermit, would have thought of rescuing the tomb of Mahomet from the hands of the infidel, instead of the Holy Sepulchre. Let us, then, go forward with one of our representative men. Let us present our own chosen son of New York. (Protracted and boisterous cheering. The whole company rose and cheered lustily for several minutes.) Let us present him to the Chicago Convention ; let us secure his nomination if we can, and let us secure his elec- tion, if he be nominated. He is not. faultless ; he may have made some mis- takes ; but where will you find an honester record ? (Applause.) Where will you find a person who, in a long career in the Senate, going there under con- tumely and reproach, unkindly treated by his associates — where will you find one who has borne himself so meekly, so wisely, so discreetly, so distinguish- inwly ? Our preference is for him ; but we go for any other nominee, equally a representative man. We have our preferences, but we do not adhere to those preferences if the Convention, in its wisdom, should think otherwise ; but if we take a representative man, we shall have in the Territories, from henceforth and forever, free soil, free speech, a free press, free consciences, and free men. (Great cheering.) The Chairman then read the next toast : " The Republican Party — It believes in the faith of the fathers of the Re- public ; cherishes their traditions, and venerates their examples. It is devoted to the union of the States, and to the freedom and honor of each. God's will and the laws of the land are the only authorities to which it professes allegiance. Wherever it bears rule, it preserves order, maintains law, and secures every man's rights. There is not a Republican State in which any person may not travel in safety wherever he pleases, pursue his business without molestation, and write and speak on all subjects, as his conscience and self-respect may dic- tate. Its principles need only to be extended, to present the same spectacle throughout the whole land." (Applause.) • 26 He called upon David Dudley Field, Esq., to respond. Mr. Field was loudly cheered when he vacated his seat to speak to the above sentiment. He said : — SPEECH OF DAVID DUDLEY FIELD, Esq. Mr. President and Gentlemen : " It need not surprise us that the Republican party has encountered mis- representation and abuse. A new party, advancing rapidly to power, offering a firm resistance to the aggressive policy of the slaveholders — a policy begotten of the love of money and the love of rule — must expect to be vilified in pro- portion as it is feared. The weight of government cannot be transferred from one side to the other, any more than a burthen can be shifted from one shoulder to the other, without a temporary stagger. Power never passes from the few to the many, or from the many to the few, but after a struggle ; and when an oligarchy is giving way, it strikes with a violence short-lived, but vindictive and cruel. " It is not in any offensive sense that I term the slaveholders an oligarchy. I know how many estimable persons there are in the South, and I would say nothing against them personally ; but the slaveholders, of whom there are scarcely more than three hundred thousand in all, have combined to rule, and they have long ruled, the country; and it is. because this rule has become at last oppressive and intolerable that a majority of the free people of the North, moved by a common impulse, have united in resistance. The body thus united is the Republican party. " I have said that this party is new. It has arisen and grown to its present vast proportions within the last six years, but its principles are as old as the Constitution itself. Perhaps I cannot better use the few minutes which I can venture to take in response to the toast just given, than by re-stating some of the most prominent of those principles. " First, let me say what the Republican party is not. It is not an abolition party. There is, perhaps, some confusion of ideas, growing out of the prevalent use of the woi d abolitionist. If it were taken to mean only one who would desire to see slavery abolished all over the world by some safe process, just alike to the master and to the slave, there is a vast majority of men and women throughout Christendom, the Southern States themselves included, who would be aboli- tionists. That, however, is not the meaning now affixc-d to the word in this country. Nor does it mean a citizen of a slave State who aims at the gradual emancipation of the s'aves. Such a person we call an emancipationist. There are many such in Kentucky and Missouri, as we know, and elsewhere in the South, as I doubt not. But if the word abolitionist means, as I understand it, one, who, living in a free State, would interfere actively in the slave States to abolish the slavery which they tolerate, then I say the Republican party is not, never has been, and nevci" will be, an abolition party. It will not directly nor indirectly interfere with slavery in the States whose laws permit it. Our doc- trine is, that the States are sovei'eign and independent, except so far as they have ceded their rights to the Union. We believe that New York has no more right to unmake a slave in Virginia, than Virginia has to make a slave in New York. We go further : we regard all the States not only as legally competent to the management of their own concerns, but as morally competent; as the best judges of what is for their own good ; as equals in rights and in dignity ; as entitled to fraternal respect as truly as legal deference. By no means, there- fore, whether by law, by violence, or by the pressure of external public opinion, would we attempt to coerce them into a change of any of their institutions. 2T " The Republican party is not a disunion party. It loves the Union, not with a cold, calculating love, but with a warm, heartfelt devotion. It loves it for the heroic past ; it loves it for the glowing future. The traditions of brotherly help and counsel, the history of sacrifices and successes, side by side, are stored in the memory of all Republicans. Every consideration of duty, interest, aifec- tion, binds us to the union of these States. Nay, we believe not only that the Union ought to be preserved, but that it cannot be destroyed. If, in the mad- ness and folly of the moment, there should be an attempt to sever the republic, partially successful, it could not remain disunited. The Almighty has stamped his law upon the hills and rivers of this continent, that they shall be governed by one race, and under one rule. The valley of the Mississippi can no more be parted, than the great river itself can be cut in two, and half of it rolled bickward. They who own the upper waters will own the lower also, let poli- ticians, disunionists, conventions. States even, say what they will. The Republican is not a sectional party. What is meant by sectionalism ? Not surely that the majority of those who profess particular tenets, or even all of them, live io a particular section. That might happen, nay. must happ-n, in all cases where a movement is not from the start universal. The philosophy of Plato and the jurisprudence of Rome were never sectional, though for ages the one was shut in Greece and the other in Italy. The Republican party Avould not be sectional, though in the whole century not a single republican should live in a slave State. The test of sectionalism is the nature of the tenets which the party professes, and the conduct which it aims to pursue. There is nothing in our tenets or our conduct which is incompatible with Southern life and Southern institutions. There are Republicans good and true in Kentucky and in Missouri ; there might be the same in Virginia or in Georgia. Having thus stated what the Republican party is not, let me state what it is, what it professes, and what it aims to accomplish. Its most distinctive principle lies in its opposition to the extension of slavery. With existing institutions it does not intermeddle; but, believing slavery to be a moral, social, and political evil, it will legislate, when it legislates at all on the subject, in favor of the good and against the evil. Upon this principle it will preserve and enforce the laws against the slave trade ; it will punish the slave-trader as a pirate, and keep a federal squadron on the coast of Africa to intercept and suppress theinfemous and cruel tiafKc in human beings. Upon the same principle it will protect the Territories from the spread of slavery. ^Vlletller it shall do this by prohibiting slavery by act of Congress, or by giving full effect to Territorial laws of exclusion, the mo- tive and the end are the same. We believe that Congress has the power of legislation over the Territories, and may exclude slavery. Whether it shall do so actively, or leave the subject to the Territorial Legislatures, one thing is cer- tain — Republicans Avill never consent to an act of Congress extending slavery to the Territories, or protecting it there. If slavery ever again enters a Territory of this Union, it must enter it after the Territorial Legislature has assembled and passed a law in its favor; which event, I take it, is not likely to happen, if the law of freedom, which is the primal law of the land, be enforced until the Legislature shall act. It is plainly the unalterable determination of the Repub- lican party, that Congress shall never again pass a law in favor of slavery, under any circumstances whatever. So far as human servitude is to be protected and encouraged, the States must do it for themselves, and within their own borders, where they shall be left undisturbed either by the federal arm, or by their sister States. A second principle of the Republican party aims at the maintenance intact of 28 all the riglits of the States. The Union defends the States, the States defend the citizens. Such is the general theory of our institutions. The freedom of the citizen is mainly dependent upon the spirit, dignity, and authority of the States. To these we are unalterably devoted. We of Xew York, for example, mean never to allow slavery to come into this free State, no matter how many laws Congress or the other States may pass. If a slave escapes hither he may be reclaimed. Such is the compact formed by our fathers, and we will abide by it; but beyond that we will not go; and whenever a master brings a slave here, the moment he touches our soil he shall be free. Our opponents maintain the contrary, if we may judge them by the late attempt of the State of Virginia to procure a decision from the courts, that a Virginian may bring his slaves into our State and hold them here. We think that New York and Virginia both may declare what persons, not citizens of the United States, may enter their possessions. We hold, also, that Congress cannot pass a law to punish a citizen of New York for any writing or speech uttered here. So long as this sovereign State gives us leave, we shall write and speak without the favor of Congress. Our opponents appear to think ditferently, as we gather from the late debate in the Senate of the United States upon Mr. Douglas's proposition. A third principle of the Republican party is, devotion to the law and legal methods of redress, in opposition to disorder and violence. It holds with inflex- ible tenacity to the doctrine that for all legal wrong, the law furnishes the only legal remedy; that disorder and violence are not more the symptoms of decay, than presages of Revolution. There are other principles of great importance, though of less magnitude than those I have mentioned ; but I have not time to pursue them further. 1 hese principles, as I have said, are as old as the Constitution itself, though the party which professes them is new. They have been taught us from the cradle, we have read them in every volume of our history, and when the occa- sion came for vindicating them by acts, a whole people sprang to their feet, and the great party of which we are speaking, took possession of almost all the North. No wonder that a movement so spontaneous and general should have been made. The greatest name known to us, and perhaps to the world, is that of Washington ; and next to him in popular regard is Jefferson. The Republi- can creed can be extracted from the writings of Washington and Jetferson alone. We are aiming at nothing new — we are seeking only to preserve, main- tain, and defend the old. Ours is the true conservative party. We stand upon the principles, we pursue the policy, of our fathers. Th