.S7Y 
 
 Copy A 
 
HERBERT SPENCER 
 
 ON 
 
 THE AMERICANS 
 
 AND 
 
 THE AMERICANS ON HERBERT SPENCER. 
 
 BEING A FULL REPORT OF HIS INTERVIEW, AND OF 
 
 THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE FAREWELL 
 
 BANQUET OF NOV. 11, 1882. 
 
 KEW YORK: 
 D. APPLETON AND COMPANY, 
 
 1, 8, AKD 5 BOND STr.EET. 
 1883. 
 
t 168 
 
 .S7^ 
 
 Cj)-^.u 
 
 OOPTKIGHT BY 
 
 D. AFPLETON AND COMPANY, 
 
 1SS2. 
 
 JoliDB Hopkin's Univ. U}k 
 aiit. 
 
COJSTTEI^TS 
 
 Peeface . . . . . . .5 
 
 Eepoet of Me. Spencee's Ixteeyiew ... 9 
 
 PEO0EEDI]!fG8 OF TflE SpENCEE BaNQUET . . .21 
 
 THE SPEECHES. 
 Me. Evaets's Remaeks 
 Me. Spencee's Addeess 
 Peofessoe Sumnee's Speech 
 Remaeks of Me. Schuez 
 Addeess of Peofessoe Maesii 
 Me, Fiske's Speech 
 Me. Beechee's Rejiaeks . 
 
 25 
 28 
 35 
 40 
 45 
 50 
 58 
 
 UXSPOKE^' SPEECHES. 
 
 What Me. Youmaxs did xot say . . . .67 
 
 What Me. Waed was eeady to say ' . " ' . . 76 
 
 What Me. Leland got isro Chance to say . . 80 
 
 LETTEPJ.' 
 
 Lettee feom De. Holmes .... 84 
 
 " Peesident "White , . . .85 
 
 " Peesident Baenaed ... 86 
 
 " R. Hebee Newton .... 87 
 
 " J. B. Stallo . . . . .88 
 
 " Geoege M. Dayie .... 89 
 
 " Daniel Geeenleaf Thompson . . 89 
 
 " Feed, W. Hineichs. ... 91 
 
 " W. D. Le Sueue . . , .98 
 
 " Wilmot L, Waeeen . . . .95 
 
 " Hugh McCulloch .... 95 
 
6 PREFACE. 
 
 cruited a little from better sleep, he consented to the arrangement. 
 Mr. Spencer at first improved at Newport, and hoped that he 
 might have a few days of strength to enjoy New York before 
 leaving. But he was again disappointed, as is shown by the fol- 
 lowing extract from a letter of November 4th : 
 
 " I went wrong again at Boston, and my head has been since 
 quite as much disordered as at any time since my arrival. I stay 
 here until Wednesday, because it is absolutely needful to shun all 
 excitements save that of the dinner itself. I must peremptorily 
 decline committing myself to anything else. I am sorry to dis- 
 appoint you and others; but, even as it is, I look forward with 
 some alarm to the state of brain with which I shall start on my 
 return voyage." 
 
 It is thus apparent how serious an invahd our visitor was, 
 how reasonable were his apprehensions of the effect of an excur- 
 sion to this country, and how imperative was the necessity that 
 he should maintain the utmost privacy while here. In fact, very 
 soon after his arrival his chief solicitude was to recover vigor 
 enough to get home again. Many of Mr. Spencer's friends all 
 over the country were sorely disappointed at not being able to 
 meet him, to shake hands with him, and express to him their 
 admiration and their gratitude, but it is to be hoped they will 
 recognize that his disabilities were such as to make this wholly 
 impossible. 
 
 The reference that it has been felt needful here to make to 
 Mr. Spencer's state of health leads to a further consideration in 
 relation to it. Having previously animadverted upon political 
 questions, when interviewed, in his farewell remarks at the dinner 
 he thought proper to address himself to a topic of more social and 
 personal interest. Mr. Spencer is not practiced in the arts of 
 after-dinner speech-making, and he was certainly in no condition 
 to trust himself to impromptu remarks suitable to a festive oc- 
 casion. He had but one opportunity to address the American 
 people; and it was not the quality of the man to indulge in the 
 strain of vulgar flattery that too many of his countrymen find 
 available in their intercourse with Americans. He therefore 
 chose to be true to himself as a sincere friend of our people, and 
 to offer some suggestions which it seemed desirable for them to 
 ponder. As a life-long student of social progress, he did not 
 
PREFACE. 7 
 
 think American society liad reached the final stage of that prog- 
 ress — and he said so. He thought the great ideal of American life 
 — action, enterprise, work — neither a permanent nor the highest 
 ideal of human society. The law of evolution, which has brought 
 us up to this from a much lower condition, must carry us on still 
 further. Work is but a means, and the highest objects of hfe are 
 defeated when it is made an end. Wliere work becomes such a 
 passion as to be pursued without regard to what it is/<?r, or as a 
 means of varied and cultivated enjoyment, it must run into such 
 excesses as to be widely and seriously injurious. He pointed out 
 various of its evil consequences, and thought that what we most 
 want is to give greater attention to those higher uses and ends of 
 life to which work is tributary. The theme was wisely selected ; 
 Mr. Spencer could have employed the occasion for no better pur- 
 pose than to set the people to thinking how they are cheated out 
 of the best that life can give by the mere craze and infatuation for 
 working and learning. 
 
 What Mr. Spencer said at the banquet has been received 
 by nearly everybody in the best spirit, as wholesome truth that 
 should be taken to heart. But some have thought it incongru- 
 ous that a chronic invalid — himself a victim of overwork — should 
 venture to talk to a robust and irrepressible people about the 
 effects of overwork. Mr. Spencer may possibly have thought 
 that experience counts for something in a matter of this kind ; 
 but he treated the subject generally and impersonally, and said 
 nothing about himself. Had he, however, seen fit to refer to him- 
 self, there would have been tenfold strength in his case. He broke 
 down completely from excessive overwork in 1855, and since that 
 time has not known what it is to have a night of sound, refresh- 
 ing sleep. And yet the magnitude of his labors during that period 
 is to-day the astonishment of the world. And how has he ac- 
 complished so great an amount of difficult work ? Simply by a 
 devout observance of the requirements of his own gospel of re- 
 laxation. He bas showed us, as no man ever before showed, what 
 power of work comes out of the pleasure of cultivated amuse- 
 ments. His recreations have been systematic — concerts, operas, 
 theatres, billiards, social entertainments, city rambles, and coun- 
 try excursions ; and it has been his fixed rule, when work grew 
 burdensome, to strike his tasks abruptly and go away for pleas- 
 
8 PEEFACE. 
 
 ure, and amuse himself till work again became itself attractive 
 and enjoyable. 
 
 Mr. Spencer's suggestions to the American people, that their 
 intense passion for work is a mistake, were made on the basis of 
 what he had observed of our characteristics, and what he knew of 
 social tendencies ; but he might have abundantly re-enforced his 
 view from the depths of his own experience, both with regard to 
 the evils of overwork and the wonderful efficacy of recreation to 
 diminish those evils. It is impossible, therefore, to break the 
 force of his admonitions by any imputation of inconsistency. 
 
 The proceedings of the banquet were very significant. That 
 which has made possible the demonstration described in these 
 pages can hardly fail to check much of the vicious criticism with 
 which Mr. Spencer has been hitherto assailed. An excellent un- 
 derstanding has grown up between him and our people, which 
 began years ago, and has led at last to this cordial public expres- 
 sion. He never dedicated but one work (the "Descriptive Soci- 
 ology"), and that was as follows : 
 
 "To MY American friends, in recognition of the en- 
 couragement I HAVE received FROM THEIR EARLY SHOWN AND 
 LONG-CONTINUED INTEREST IN MY WORKS." 
 
 And the American people have returned the compliment by 
 purchasing more than a hundred thousand of his books, reprinted 
 in this country, and upon every volume of which he has been paid 
 as if he had been an American author. 
 
 No thanks to the American Government, however, which is 
 alone among all civilized nations in refusing to recognize Herbert 
 Spencer's right of property in the works into which he has put 
 the labor of a life-time. 
 
 E. L. Y. 
 
EEPOET 
 
 OF 
 
 MR. SPENCER'S INTERVIEW. 
 
 The following report of an interview witli Mr. Spen- 
 cer appeared in several ISTew York newspapers on the 
 morning of October 20, 1882 : 
 
 Hearing that Herbert Spencer had returned to New 
 York in a somewhat improved condition of health, an 
 intimate American friend obtained his consent to be ques- 
 tioned regarding his impressions of this country, to the 
 following effect : 
 
 " I believe, Mr. Spencer, that you have not been inter- 
 viewed since your arrival in this country ? " 
 
 "I have not. The statements in the newspapers im- 
 plying personal intercourse are unauthorized, and many 
 of them incorrect. It was said, for example, that I was 
 ill from the effects of the voyage ; the truth being that 
 I suffered no inconvenience whatever, save that arising 
 from disturbed rest. Subsequent accounts of me in re- 
 spect of disorders, diet, dress, habits, etc., have been 
 equally wide of the mark." 
 
 "Have these misrepresentations been annoying to 
 you?" 
 
 " In some measure, though I am not very sensitive ; 
 but I have been chiefly annoyed by statements which 
 
10 MR. SPENCER INTERVIEWED. 
 
 affect, not myself only, but others. For some ten days 
 or more there went on reappearing in various journals an 
 alleged opinion of mine concerning Mr. Oscar Wilde. 
 The statement that I had uttered it was absolutely base- 
 less. I have expressed no opinion whatever concerning 
 Mr. Oscar Wilde. Naturally, those who put in circula- 
 tion fictions of this kind may be expected to mix much 
 fiction with what fact they report." 
 
 " Might not this misrepresentation have been avoided 
 by admitting interviewers ? " 
 
 " Possibly ; but, in the first place, I have not been 
 sufficiently well ; and, in the second place, I am averse to 
 the system. To have to submit to cross-examination, 
 under penalty of having ill-natured things said if one re- 
 fuses, is an invasion of personal liberty which I dislike. 
 Moreover, there is implied what seems to me an undue 
 love of personalities. Your journals recall a witticism of 
 the poet Heine, who said that, * when a woman writes a 
 novel, she has one eye on the paper and the other on some 
 man — except the Countess Hahn-hahn, who has only one 
 eye.' In like manner, it seems to me that, in the political 
 discussions that fill your papers, everything is treated in 
 connection with the doings of individuals — some candi- 
 date for office, or some 'boss' or wire-puller. I think it 
 not improbable that this appetite for personalities, among 
 other evils, venerates this recklessness of statement. The 
 appetite must be ministered to ; and, in the eagerness to 
 satisfy its cravings, there comes less and less care respect- 
 ing the correctness of what is said." 
 
 "Has what you have seen answered your expecta- 
 tions ? " 
 
 " It has far exceeded them. Such books about Amer- 
 ica as I had looked into had given me no adequate idea 
 of the immense developments of material civilization 
 which I have everywhere found. The extent, wealth, and 
 
MR. SPEXCER INTERVIEWED. H 
 
 magnificence of your cities, and especially the splendor 
 of New York, have altogether astonished me. Though I 
 have not visited the wonder of the West, Chicago, yet 
 some of your minor modern places, such as Cleveland, 
 have sufficiently amazed me, by the marvelous results of 
 one generation's activity. Occasionally, when I have 
 been in places of some ten thousand inhabitants, where 
 the telephone is in general use, I have felt somewhat 
 ashamed of our own unenterprising towns ; many of 
 which, of fifty thousand inhabitants and more, make no 
 use of it." 
 
 " I suppose you recognize in these results the great 
 benefit of free institutions ? " 
 
 " Ah, now comes one of the inconveniences of inter- 
 viewing. I have been in the country less than two 
 months ; have seen but a relatively small part of it, and 
 but comparatively few people ; and yet you wish from 
 me a definite opinion on a difficult question." 
 
 "Perhaps you will answer, subject to the qualification 
 that you are but giving your first impressions ? " 
 
 "Well, with that understanding, I may reply that, 
 though free institutions have been partly the cause, I 
 think they have not been the chief cause. In the first 
 place, the American people have come into possession of 
 an unparalleled fortune — the mineral wealth, and the vast 
 tracts of virgin soil producing abundantly with small cost 
 of culture. Manifestly that alone goes a long way toward 
 producing this enormous prosperity. Then they have 
 profited by inheriting all the arts, appliances, methods, 
 developed by older societies, while leaving behind the ob- 
 structions existing in them. They have been able to pick 
 and choose from the products of all past experience ; ap- 
 propriating the good and rejecting the bad. Then, be- 
 sides these favors of fortune, there are factors proper to 
 themselves. I perceive in American faces generally, a 
 
12 MR. SPENCER INTERVIEWED. 
 
 great amount of determination — a kind of ' do or die ' ex- 
 pression ; and this trait of character, joined with a power 
 of work exceeding that of any other people, of course 
 produces an unparalleled rapidity of progress. Once 
 more, there is the inventiveness, which, stimulated by the 
 need for economizing labor, has been so wisely fostered. 
 Among us in England, there are many foolish people who, 
 while thinking that a man who toils with his hands has 
 an equitable claim to the product, and, if he has special 
 skill, may rightly have the advantage of it, also hold that 
 if a man toils with his brain, perhaps for years, and, unit- 
 ing genius with perseverance, evolves some valuable in- 
 vention, the public may rightly claim the benefit. The 
 Americans have been more far-seeing. The enormous 
 museum of patents which I saw at Washington is signifi- 
 cant of the attention paid to inventors' claims ; and the 
 nation profits immensely from having, in this direction 
 (though not in all others), recognized property in mental 
 products. Beyond question, in respect of mechanical ap- 
 pliances, the Americans are ahead of all nations. If, 
 along with your material progress, there went equal 
 progress of a higlier kind, there would remain nothing 
 to be wished." 
 
 " That is an ambiguous qualification. What do you 
 mean by it ? " 
 
 "You will understand when I tell you what I was 
 thinking of the other day. After pondering over what I 
 have seen of your vast manufacturing and trading estab- 
 lishments, the rush of traffic in your street-cars and ele- 
 vated railways, your gigantic hotels and Fifth Avenue 
 palaces, I was suddenly reminded of the Italian repub- 
 lics of the middle ages ; and recalled the fact that, while 
 there was growing up in them great commercial activity, 
 a development of the arts which made them the envy of 
 Europe, and a building of princely mansions which con- 
 
MR. SPEXCER IXTERYIEWED. 13 
 
 tinue to be the admiration of travelers, their people were 
 gradually losing their freedom." 
 
 " Do you mean this as a suggestion that we are doing 
 the like?" 
 
 " It seems to me that you are. You retain the forms 
 of freedom, but, so far as I can gather, there has been a 
 considerable loss of the substance. It is true that those 
 who rule you do not do it by means of retainers armed 
 with swords ; but they do it through regiments of men 
 armed with voting-papers, who obey the word of com- 
 mand as loyally as did the dependents of the old feudal 
 nobles, and who thus enable their leaders to override the 
 general will and make the community submit to their ex- 
 actions as effectually as their prototypes of old. It is 
 doubtless true that each of your citizens votes for the 
 candidate he chooses for this or that office, from Presi- 
 dent downward, but his hand is guided by a power be- 
 hind, which leaves him scarcely any choice. * Use your 
 political power as we tell you, or else throw it away,' is 
 the alternative offered to the citizen. The political ma- 
 chinery as it is now worked has little resemblance to that 
 contemplated at the outset of your political life. Mani- 
 festly, those who framed your constitution never dreamed 
 that twenty thousand citizens would go to the poll led by 
 a * boss.' America exemplifies, at the other end of the 
 social scale, a change analogous to that which has taken 
 place under sundry despotisms. You know that in Japan, 
 before the recent revolution, the divine ruler, the Mikado, 
 nominally supreme, was practically a puppet in the hands 
 of his chief minister, the Shogun. Here it seems to me 
 that the 'sovereign people' is fast becoming a puppet 
 which moves and speaks as wire-pullers determine." 
 
 " Then you think that republican institutions are a 
 failure." 
 
 " By no means ! I imply no such conclusion. Thirty 
 
14 MR. SPENCER INTERVIEWED. 
 
 years ago, when often discussing politics with an English 
 friend, and defending republican institutions, as I always 
 have done and do still, and when he urged against me 
 the ill- working of such institutions over here, I habit- 
 ually replied that the Americans got their form of gov- 
 ernment by a happy accident, not by normal progress, 
 and that they would have to go back before they could 
 go forward. What has since happened seems to me to 
 have justified that view ; and what I see now confirms 
 me in it. America is showing, on a larger scale than 
 ever before, that * paper constitutions' will not work as 
 they are intended to work. The truth, first recognized 
 by Macintosh, that ' constitutions are not made, but grow,' 
 which is part of the larger truth that societies throughout 
 their whole organizations are not made but grow, at once, 
 when accepted, disposes of the notion that you can work, 
 as you hope, any artificially-devised system of government. 
 It becomes an inference that if your political structure has 
 been manufactured, and not grown, it will forthwith begin 
 to grow into something different from that intended — 
 something in harmony with the natures of citizens and 
 the conditions under which the society exists. And it evi- 
 dently has been so with you. Within the forms of your 
 constitution there has grown up this organization of pro- 
 fessional politicians, altogether uncontemplated at the 
 outset, which has become in large measure the ruling 
 power." 
 
 " But will not education and the diffusion of political 
 knowledge .fit men for free institutions ? " 
 
 "No. It is essentially a question of character, and 
 only in a secondary degree a question of knowledge. But 
 for the universal delusion about education as a panacea 
 for political evils, this would have been made sufficiently 
 clear by the evidence daily disclosed in your papers. Are 
 not the men who officer and control your Federal, State, 
 
MR. SPENCER INTERVIEWED. 15 
 
 and municipal organizations — wlio manipulate your cau- 
 cuses and conventions, and run your partisan campaigns 
 — all educated men ? and has their education prevented 
 them from engaging in, or permitting, or condoning, the 
 briberies, lobbyings, and other corrupt methods which 
 vitiate the actions of your administrations? Perhaps 
 party newspapers exaggerate these things ; but what am 
 I to make of the testimony of your civil-service reformers 
 — men of all parties ? If I understand the matter aright, 
 they are attacking, as vicious and dangerous, a system 
 which has grown up under the natural spontaneous work- 
 ing of your free institutions — are exposing vices which 
 education has proved powerless to prevent." 
 
 " Of course, ambitious and unscrupulous men will 
 secure the offices, and education will aid them in their 
 selfish purposes ; but would not those purposes be thwart- 
 ed, and better government secured, by raising the stand- 
 ard of knowledge among the people at large ? " 
 
 " Very little. The current theory is that if the young 
 are taught what is right, and the reasons why it is right, 
 they will do what is right when they grow up. But, 
 considering what religious teachers have been doing these 
 tv/o thousand years, it seems to me that all history is 
 against the conclusion, as much as is the conduct of these 
 well-educated citizens I have referred to ; and I do not 
 see why you expect better results among the masses. 
 Personal interests will sway the men in the ranks as they 
 sway the men above them ; and the education which fails 
 to make the last consult public good rather than private 
 good will fail to make the first do it. The benefits of 
 political purity are so general and remote, and the profit 
 to each individual so inconspicuous, that the common 
 citizen, educate him as you like, will habitually occupy 
 himself with his personal affairs, and hold it not worth 
 his v/hile to fight against each abuse as soon as it appears. 
 
16 MR. SPEXCER INTERVIEWED. 
 
 Not lack of information, but lack of certain moral senti- 
 ments, is the root of the evil." 
 
 " You mean that people have not a sufficient sense of 
 public duty ? " 
 
 " Well, that is one way of putting it ; but there is a 
 more specific way. Probably it will surprise you if I say 
 that the American has not, I think, a sufficiently quick 
 sense of his own claims, and at the same time, as a neces- 
 sary consequence, not a sufficiently quick sense of the 
 claims of others — for the two traits are organically re- 
 lated, I observe that you tolerate various small inter- 
 ferences and dictations which Englishmen are prone to 
 resist. I am told that the English are remarked on for 
 their tendency to grumble in such cases ; and I have no 
 doubt it is true." 
 
 "Do you think it worth while for people to make 
 themselves disagreeable by resenting every trifling ag- 
 gression ? We Americans think it involves too much 
 loss of time and temper, and doesn't pay." 
 
 " Exactly. That is what I mean by character. It is 
 this easy-going readiness to permit small trespasses, be- 
 cause it would be troublesome or profitless or unpopular 
 to oppose, which leads to the habit of acquiescence in 
 wrong and the decay of free institutions. Free institu- 
 tions can be maintained only by citizens each of whom is 
 instant to oppose every illegitimate act, every assumption 
 of supremacy, every official excess of power, however 
 trivial it may seem. If, as you say of the American, he 
 pauses to consider whether he can afford the time and 
 trouble — Svhether it will pay' — corruption is sure to 
 creep in. All these lapses from higher to lower forms 
 begin in trifling ways ; and it is only by incessant watch- 
 fulness that they can be prevented. As one of your early 
 statesmen said, ' The price of liberty is eternal vigilance.' 
 But it is far less against foreign aggressions upon na- 
 
MR. SPENCER INTERVIEWED. 17 
 
 tional liberty that this vigilance is required than against 
 the insidious growth of domestic interferences with per- 
 sonal liberty. In some private administrations which I 
 have been concerned with, I have often insisted, much to 
 the disgust of officials, that, instead of assuming, as people 
 usually do, that things are going right until it is proved 
 that they are going wrong, the proper course is to assume 
 that they are going wrong until it is proved that they 
 are going right. You will find, continually, that private 
 corporations, such as joint-stock banking companies, come 
 to grief from not acting upon this principle. And what 
 holds of these small and simple private administrations 
 holds still more of the great and complex public adminis- 
 trations. People are taught, and, I suppose, believe, that 
 ' the heart of man is deceitful above all things and des- 
 perately wicked ' ; and yet, strangely enough, believing 
 this, they place implicit trust in those they appoint to 
 this or that function. I do not think so ill of human 
 nature ; but, on the other hand, 1 do not think so well 
 of human nature as to believe it will do without being 
 watched." 
 
 " You hinted that, while Americans do not assert their 
 own individualities sufficiently in small matters, they, re- 
 ciprocally, do not sufficiently respect the individualities 
 of others." 
 
 " Did I ? Here, then, comes another of the inconven- 
 iences of interviewing. I should have kept this opinion 
 to myself if you had asked me no questions ; and now I 
 must either say what I do not think, which I can not, or 
 I must refuse to answer, which perhaps will be taken to 
 mean more than I intend, or I must specify, at the risk of 
 giving offense. As the least evil, I suppose I must do the 
 last. The trait I refer to comes out in various ways, 
 small and great. It is shown by the disrespectful manner 
 in which individuals are dealt with in your journals — the 
 
18 MR. SPENCER INTERVIEWED. 
 
 placarding of public men in sensational headings, the 
 dragging of private people and their affairs into print. 
 There seems to be a notion that the public have a right 
 to intrude on private life as far as they like ; and this I 
 take to be a kind of moral trespassing. It is true that 
 during the last few years we have been discredited in 
 London by certain weekly papers which do the like (ex- 
 cept in the typographical display) ; but in our daily press, 
 metropolitan and provincial, there is nothing of the kind. 
 Then, in a larger way, the trait is seen in this damaging 
 of private property by your elevated railways without 
 making compensation ; and it is again seen in the doings 
 of railway governments, not only when overriding the 
 rights of shareholders, but in dominating over courts of 
 justice and State governments. The fact is, that free in- 
 stitutions can be properly worked only by men each of 
 whom is jealous of his own rights, and also sympathetic- 
 ally jealous of the rights of others— will neither himself 
 aggress on his neighbors, in small things or great, nor 
 tolerate aggression on them by others. The republican 
 form of government is the highest form of government ; 
 but because of this it requires the highest type of human 
 nature — a type nowhere at present existing. We have 
 not grown up to it, nor have you." 
 
 " But we thought, Mr. Spencer, you were in favor of 
 free government in the sense of relaxed restraints, and 
 letting men and things very much alone — or what is 
 cixlled. laissez /aire P ^^ 
 
 " That is a persistent misunderstanding of my oppo- 
 nents. Everywhere, along with the reprobation of gov- 
 ernment-intrusion into various spheres where private ac- 
 tivities should be left to themselves, I have contended 
 that in its special sphere, the maintenance of equitable 
 relations among citizens, governmental action should be 
 extended and elaborated." 
 
MR. SPEXCER INTERVIEWED. 19 
 
 " To return to your various criticisms : must I, then, 
 understand that you think unfavorably of our fu- 
 ture?" 
 
 "No one can form anything more than vague and 
 general conclusions respecting your future. The factors 
 are too numerous, too vast, too far beyond measure in 
 their quantities and intensities. The world has never be- 
 fore seen social phenomena at all comparable with those 
 presented in the United States. A society spreading 
 over enormous tracts while still preserving its political 
 continuity is a new thing. This progressive incorpora- 
 tion of vast bodies of immigrants of various bloods has 
 never occurred on such a scale before. Large empires 
 composed of different peoples have, in previous cases, 
 been formed by conquest and annexation. Then your 
 immense plexus of railways and telegraphs tends to con- 
 solidate this vast aggregate of States in a way that no 
 such aggregate has ever before been consolidated. And 
 there are many minor co-operating causes unlike those 
 hitherto known. No one can say how it is all going to 
 work out. That there will come hereafter troubles of 
 various kinds, and very grave ones, seems highly prob- 
 able ; but all nations have had, and will have, their 
 troubles. Already you have triumphed over one great 
 trouble, and may reasonably hope to triumph over others. 
 It may, I think, be reasonably held that, both because 
 of its size and the heterogeneity of its components, the 
 American nation will be a long time in evolving its 
 ultimate form, but that its ultimate form will be high. 
 One great result is, I think, tolerably clear. From biolog- 
 ical truths it is to be inferred that the eventual mixture of 
 the allied varieties of the Aryan race forming the popula- 
 tion will produce a finer type of man than has hitherto 
 existed, and a type of man more plastic, more adaptable, 
 more capable of undergoing the modifications needful for 
 
20 SIR- SPEXCER INTERVIEWED. 
 
 complete social life.* I think that, whatever difficulties 
 they may have to surmount, and whatever tribulations 
 they may have to pass through, the Americans may 
 reasonably look forward to a time when they will have 
 produced a civilization grander than any the world has 
 known." 
 
 * This passage has been misunderstood. Mr. Spencer has been sup- 
 posed to mean that great advantage will result from mixture of all the 
 races now on the American Continent. Nothing could be further from 
 his meaning. It is a corollary from biological facts that mixture of 
 widely-divergent varieties of a species, such as are the Europeans, Afri- 
 cans, and Asiatics, is extremely injurious ; while mixture of slightly- 
 divergent varieties of a species, such as are the divisions of the Aryan 
 race inhabiting different parts of Europe, is extremely beneficial. 
 
PEOOEEDINGS 
 
 SPENCER BANQUET 
 
 Theee v/as a very strong desire, on the part of a great 
 number of the most intelligent people in the United 
 States, to meet and welcome Herbert Spencer — a feeling 
 that would have broken into formal ovation in every city 
 could the opportunity have been given. And there were 
 many who felt that, at any rate, he must not leave our 
 shores until a chance had been afforded for some public 
 expression of the sentiments, entertained by multitudes, of 
 admiration for his genius and appreciation of his eminent 
 services in the world of thought. But it was long un- 
 certain whether he would be able to take part in any pro- 
 ceedings of this kind, and, when at last he consented, the 
 time was very short to make the desirable preparations. 
 The customary formal correspondence of invitation and 
 acceptance that precedes such occasions was therefore 
 omitted, and the more readily because it was known to 
 be in this case wholly superfluous. So strong, even in- 
 tense, was the desire to participate in any demonstration 
 of the kind, that it became necessary to keep all mention 
 of the banquet out of the newspapers as far as possible, 
 as the less widely it was known the fewer would be the 
 disappointments. It was at first intended to take a large 
 
22 
 
 THE SPENCER BANQUET. 
 
 place that would accommodate five hundred persons at 
 table, but there was not time for this, and Delmonico's 
 hall had to be accepted, with a convenient capacity of 
 about two hundred seats. At a meeting held for the 
 purpose, a committee was appointed to take charge of the 
 arrangements, which consisted of the following gentle- 
 
 men : 
 
 E. R. Leland, Chccirman, 
 John S. Kew^beery, 
 W. ^y. AprLETON, 
 
 Henry Draper, 
 F. F. Marbury, 
 W. J. YOUMANS, Secretary. 
 
 There has been no little complaint on the part of 
 many who did not get invitations to the dinner. But 
 they should remember that, had they been invited, oth- 
 ers must have been excluded ; and, moreover, all the 
 preparations had to be very hurriedly made. The affair 
 was, however, in the highest degree successful in every 
 respect. The following is a list of the subscribers : 
 
 Fessenden N. Otis. 
 IsTelson M. Beckwith. 
 Thomas Hitchcock. 
 Horace White. 
 Frederic W. Stevens. 
 William C. Church. 
 Ogden K. Rood. 
 Edward Tuck. 
 David Dudley Field. 
 Francis F. Marbury. 
 Edmund C. Stedman. 
 Daniel M. Stimson. 
 Carl Schurz. 
 Parke Godwin. 
 Rev. W. H. Piatt. 
 William E. Ward. 
 Jonas M. Libbey. 
 Hamilton Cole. 
 
 Edward C. Hegeler. 
 Edward L. Youmans. 
 William J. Youmans. 
 Cyrus W. Field. 
 Leonidas M. Lawson. 
 Frederic H. Betts. 
 William T. Lusk. 
 John S. Newberry. 
 Salem H. Wales.* 
 Hugh McCulloch. 
 J. Spencer Turner. 
 Richard T. Colburn. 
 E. P. Hurd. 
 Daniel G. Thompson. 
 Charles Frederic Adams. 
 Frederick W. Devoe. 
 J. Seaver Page. 
 William G. Sumner. 
 
SUBSCRIBERS. 
 
 23 
 
 John Fiske. 
 John P. Townsend. 
 Courtlandt Palmer. 
 Thaddeus B. Wakeman. 
 James W. Pinchot. 
 Henry Draper. 
 Hooper C. Vanvorst. 
 Henry W. Stevens. 
 Brayton Ives. 
 Abram S. Hewitt. 
 John C. Eno. 
 Calvert Yaux. 
 Joseph W. Drexel. 
 David Buffum. 
 Samuel J. Colgate. 
 Robert B. Minturn. 
 William H. Appleton. 
 Rowland G. Hazard. 
 Cyrus Butler. 
 Charles A. Coombs. 
 Earle S. Youmans. 
 Charles B. Boothe. 
 William A. Eddy. 
 William W. Appleton. 
 Daniel S. Appleton. 
 Yincenza Botta. 
 Edward A. Silsbee. 
 Edward C. Spitzka. 
 William Green ough. 
 Abraham Jacobi. 
 Sir Richard Temple. 
 Chai'lton T. Lewis. 
 Lyman Abbott. 
 George P. Peabody. 
 Charles Holt. 
 John Bigelow. 
 Fordyce Barker. 
 William M. Boucher. 
 R. Heber Newton. 
 Amos M. Kellogg. 
 Grenville M. We^eks. 
 Rev. Mr. Morgan. 
 
 Eugene R. Leland. 
 Edward Appleton. 
 Oliver B. Bunce. 
 Minott J. Savage. 
 William Lummis. 
 Coe D. Tows. 
 Samuel L. Post, Jr. 
 Alfred Selman. 
 Henry W. Farnam. 
 James Johonnot. 
 Francis A. Stout. 
 Norman A. Calkins. 
 Simon Sterne. 
 Eiihu Root. 
 Chauncey M. Dcpew. 
 Charles K. Flint. 
 Morris K. Jesup. 
 Henry Ward Beecher. 
 William H. Draper. 
 William H. Hurlbert. 
 Stephen A. Walker. 
 William D. Shipman. 
 Cyrus W. Shaw. 
 Richard H. Manning. 
 Gerardus H. Wynkoop. 
 Francis O. French. 
 Richard H. Derby. 
 Grant B. Schley. 
 Ernest Groesbeck. 
 George R. Cathcart. 
 Henry Holt. 
 Sherburne B. Eaton. 
 Perry Belmont. 
 Herbert Nichols. 
 Benjamin H. Bristow. 
 John Elderkin. 
 Pliny T. Sexton. 
 William A. Hammond. 
 Edwin L. Godkin. 
 Gilbert M. Speir. 
 Grosvenor P. Lowrey. 
 Geors^e L. Roberts. 
 
24 
 
 THE SPENCER BANQUET. 
 
 Andrew H. Green. 
 W. Leaman. 
 Othniel C. Marsh. 
 D. Cady Eaton. 
 William W. Farnam. 
 Morris H. Henry. 
 Charles A. Dana. 
 Erastus Wiman. 
 David H. Cochran. 
 Richard M. Hunt. 
 Matthias N. Forney. 
 Nelson J. Gates. 
 D. Yan Kostrand. 
 Samuel Shethar. 
 Charles PI. Coffin. 
 Junius Henri Browne. 
 Frederic J. De Peyster. 
 William M. Evarts. 
 Albert Bierstadt. 
 Willard Bartlett. 
 Paul Dana. 
 Andrew J. Kickoff. 
 Charles M. Lunojren. 
 
 Birdseye Blakeman. 
 Addison Brown. 
 John Q. A. Ward. 
 C. E. Billquist. 
 H. L. Bridgman. 
 Edward Lott. 
 Andrew Carnegie. 
 Charles F. MacLean. 
 Archibald Alexander. 
 J. S. Cox. 
 Lester F. Ward. 
 James C. Carter. 
 Donald Manson. 
 J. P. Crawford. 
 Samuel H. Scudder. 
 Robert H. Lamborn. 
 Allen Thorndike Rice. 
 Wilmot L. Warren. 
 William M. Ivins. 
 Charles W. Dayton. 
 Cooper Hewitt. 
 William D. Kelley. 
 George B. Loring. 
 
 The gathering at Delmonico's, on the evening of No* 
 vember 9th, was large, cultivated, and brilliant. The 
 dinner was elaborate and elegant, and the decorations 
 quiet but in admirable taste. A band played selected 
 pieces, though some thought there was a little too much 
 music for easy conversation. All were delighted, and the 
 enthusiasm of the occasion ran high. The Hon. William 
 M. Evarts presided with his usual grace and felicity, and 
 his happy address of welcome was cordially received. 
 Mr. Spencer was greeted with long and hearty applause, 
 mingled with cheers and the waving of handkerchiefs. 
 His speech, which was delivered in a low, conversational 
 tone, and without gesture, betrayed his extreme physical 
 weakness, but it was listened to in deep silence and with 
 
MR. EVARTS'S REMARKS. 25 
 
 rapt attention. He sat down amid renewed and vehement 
 applause. 
 
 The speeches that followed well befitted the occasion 
 as a tribute of honor to a great thinker. They were 
 thoughtful speeches, designed not only to gratify the im- 
 mediate listeners, but to have weight with readers when 
 subsequently published. They were all thoroughly appre- 
 ciated, and most heartily applauded. 
 
 THE SPEECHES. 
 
 MR. EYARTS'S REMARKS. 
 
 When the dinner had been finished, Mr. Evarts rose 
 to introduce Mr. Spencer. He was received with ap- 
 plause, and said : 
 
 We are here to-night, gentlemen, to show the feeling 
 of Americans toward o;.r distinguished guest. As no 
 room and no city can hold all his friends and admirers, 
 it was necessary that a company should be made up by 
 some method out of the mass, and what so good a method 
 as that of natural selection (laughter), and the inclusion 
 within these walls of the ladies ? It is a little hard upon 
 the natural instincts and experience of man that we 
 should take up the abstruse subjects of philosophy and 
 of evolution, of all the great topics that make up Mr. 
 Spencer's contribution to the learning and the wisdom of 
 his time, at this end of the dinner. The most ancient 
 nations, even in their primitive condition, saw the folly 
 of this, and when one wished either to be inspired with 
 
26 THE SPENCER BANQUET. 
 
 the thoughts of others, or to be himself a diviner of the 
 thoughts of others, fasting was necessary, and the Ama- 
 zuUis, from whom I think a great many things might be 
 learned for the good of the people of the present time, 
 have a maxim that will commend itself to your common 
 sense. They say the continually stuffed body can not 
 see secret things. (Laughter.) Now, from my personal 
 knowledge of the men I see at these tables, they are 
 owners of continually stuffed bodies. (Laughter.) I 
 have addressed them at public dinners, on all topics and 
 for all purposes, and whatever sympathy they may have 
 shown with the divers occasions which brought them to- 
 gether, they come up to the Amazulu notion of continu- 
 ally stuffed bodies. Li primitive times they had a custom 
 which we, only under the system of differentiation, prac- 
 tice now at this dinner. When men wished to possess 
 themselves of the learning, the wisdom, the philosophy, 
 the courage, the great traits of any person, they immedi- 
 ately proceeded to eat him up as soon as he was dead 
 (laughter), having only this diversity in that early time 
 ■ — that he should be either roasted or boiled, according as 
 he was fat or thin. (Laughter.) Now, out of that nar- 
 row compass, see how by the process of differentiation 
 and of multiplication of effects we have come to a dinner 
 of a dozen courses and wines of as many varieties ; and 
 that simple process of appropriating the virtue and the 
 wisdom of the great man that was brought before the 
 feast is now diversified into an analysis of all the men 
 here under the cunning management of many speakers. 
 No doubt, preserving, as we do, the identity of all these 
 institutions, it is often considered a great art, or at least 
 a great delight, to roast our friends and put in hot 
 water those against whom we have a grudge. (Laugh- 
 ter.) 
 
 Now, Mr. Spencer, we are glad to meet you here. (Ap- 
 
MR. EVARTS'S REMARKS. 27 
 
 plause.) We are glad to see you, and we are glad to have 
 you see us. (Laughter.) We are glad to see you, for 
 we recognize in the breadth of your knowledge, such 
 knowledge as is useful to your race, a greater compre- 
 hension than any living man has presented to our genera- 
 tion. (Applause.) We are glad to see you because in 
 our judgment you have brought to the analysis and dis- 
 tribution of this vast knowledge a more penetrating in- 
 telligence and a more thorough insight than any living 
 man has brought even to the minor topics of his special 
 knowledge. (Applause.) In theology, in psychology, in 
 natural science, in the knov/ledge of individual man and 
 his exposition, and in the knowledge of the world, in 
 the proper sense of society which makes up the world, 
 the world worth knowing, the world worth ' speaking of, 
 the world worth planning for, the world worth working 
 for — we acknowledge your labors as surpassing those 
 of any of our kind. (Applause.) You seem to us to 
 carry away and maintain in the future the same meas- 
 ure of fame among others that we are told was given 
 in the middle ages to Albertus Magnus, the most learned 
 man of those times, whose comprehension of theology, 
 of psychology, of natural history, of politics, of his- 
 tory, and of learning, comprehended more than any man 
 since the classic time, certainly ; and yet it was found 
 of him that his knowledge v\^as rather an accumulation, 
 and that he had added no new processes and no new 
 wealth to the learning which he had achieved. 
 
 Now, I have said that we are glad to have you see us. 
 You have already treated us to a very unique piece of 
 work in vivisection (laughter), and we are expecting, 
 perhaps, that the world may be instructed after you are 
 safely on the other side of the Atlantic in a more inti- 
 mate and thorough manner concerning our merits and our 
 few faults. (Applause and laughter.) This faculty of 
 
28 THE SPENCER BANQUET. 
 
 laying on a dissecting-board an entire nation or an entire 
 age and finding out all the arteries and veins and pulsa- 
 tions of their life, is an extension beyond any that our 
 own medical schools aiford. You give us that knowledge 
 of man w^hich is practical and useful, and whatever the 
 claims or the debates may be about your system or the 
 system of those who agree with you, and however it may 
 be compared with other competing systems that have 
 preceded it, we must all agree that it is practical, that it 
 is benevolent, that it is serious, and that it is reverent 
 (applause) ; that it aims at the highest results in virtue ; 
 that it treats evil not as eternal, but as evanescent, and 
 that it expects to arrive at what is sought through faith 
 in the millennium — that condition of affairs in which 
 there is the highest morality and the greatest happiness. 
 (Applause.) And if we can come to that by these proc- 
 esses and these instructions, it matters little to the race 
 whether it be called scientific morality and mathematical 
 freedom, or by another less pretentious name. (Ap- 
 plause.) — You will please fill your glasses, while I pro- 
 pose the health of our guest, Herbert Spencer. (Contin- 
 ued applause.) 
 
 MR. SPENCER'S ADDRESS. 
 
 Mr. President and Gentlemen : Along with your 
 kindness there comes to me a great unkindness from Fate ; 
 for, now that, above all times in my life, I need full com- 
 mand of what powers of speech I possess, disturbed health 
 so threatens to interfere with them that I fear I shall 
 very inadequately express myself. Any failure in my 
 response you must please ascribe, in part at least, to a 
 greatly disordered nervous system. Regarding you as 
 representing Americans at large, I feel that the occa- 
 
MR. SPENCER'S ADDRESS. 29 
 
 sion is one on which arrears of thanks are due. I ought 
 to begin with the time, some two-and-twenty years ago, 
 when my highly-valued friend Professor Youmans, mak- 
 ing efforts to diffuse my books here, interested on their 
 behalf the Messrs. Appleton, who have ever treated me 
 so honorably and so handsomely ; and I ought to detail 
 from that time onward the various marks and acts of 
 sympathy by which I have been encouraged in a struggle 
 which vv^as for many years disheartening. But, intimat- 
 ing thus briefly my general indebtedness to my numerous 
 friends, most of them unknown, on this side of the Atlan- 
 tic, I must name more especially the many attentions and 
 proffered hospitalities met with during my late tour, as 
 well as, lastly and chiefly, this marked expression of the 
 sympathies and good wishes which many of you have 
 traveled so far to give, at great cost of that time which is 
 so precious to the American. I believe I may truly say 
 that the better health which you have so cordially wished 
 me, will be in a measure furthered by the wish ; since all 
 pleasurable emotion is conducive to health, and, as you 
 will fully believe, the remembrance of this event will ever 
 continue to be a source of pleasurable emotion, exceeded 
 by few, if any, of my remembrances. 
 
 And now that I have thanked you, sincerely though 
 too briefly, I am going to find fault with you. Already, 
 in some remarks drawn from me respecting American 
 affairs and American character, I have passed criticisms, 
 which have been accepted far more good-naturedly than 
 I could reasonably have expected ; and it seems strange 
 that I should now again propose to transgress. How- 
 ever, the fault I have to comment upon is one which 
 most will scarcely regard as a fault. It seems to me that 
 in one respect Americans have diverged too widely 
 from savages. I do not mean to say that they are in 
 general unduly civilized. Throughout large parts of the 
 
30 THE SPENCER BANQUET. 
 
 poj^nlation, even in long-settled regions, there is no excess 
 of those virtues needed for the maintenance of social har- 
 mony. Especially out in the West, men's dealings do 
 not yet betray too much of the " sweetness and light " 
 which we are told distinguish the cultured man from 
 the barbarian. Nevertheless, there is a sense in which 
 my assertion is true. You know that the primitive man 
 lacks power of application. Spurred by hunger, by dan- 
 ger, by revenge, he can exert himself energetically for a 
 time ; but his energy is spasmodic. Monotonous daily toil 
 is impossible to him. It is otherwise with the more de- 
 veloped man. The stern discipline of social life has 
 gradually increased the aptitude for persistent industry ; 
 until, among us, and still more among you, work has be- 
 come with many a passion. This contrast of nature has 
 another aspect. The savage thinks only of present satis- 
 factions, and leaves future satisfactions uncared for. Con- 
 trariwise, the American, eagerly pursuing a future good, 
 almost ignores what good the passing day offers him ; 
 and, when the future good is gained, he neglects that 
 while striving for some still remoter good. 
 
 What I have seen and heard during my stay among 
 you, has forced on me the belief that this slow change 
 from habitual inertness to persistent activity, has reached 
 an extreme from w^hich there must begin a counter- 
 change — a reaction. Everywhere I have been struck 
 with the number of faces which told in strong lines of 
 the burdens that had to be borne. I have been struck, too, 
 with the large proportion of gray-haired men ; and in- 
 quiries have brought out the fact that with you the hair 
 commonly begins to turn some ten years earlier than 
 with us. Moreover, in every circle I have met men who 
 had themselves suffered from nervous collapse due to 
 stress of business, or named friends who had either killed 
 themselves by overwork, or had been permanently inca- 
 
ME. SPEXCER'S ADDRESS. 31 
 
 pacitated, or had wasted long periods in endeavors to re- 
 cover health. I do but echo the opinion of all the observ- 
 ant persons I have spoken to, that immense injury is being 
 done by this high-pressure life — the physique is being 
 undermined. That subtle thinker and poet whom you 
 have lately had to mourn, Emerson, says, in his essay on 
 the gentleman, that the first requisite is that he shall 
 be a good animal. The requisite is a general one — it 
 extends to the man, to the father, to the citizen. We 
 hear a great deal about " the vile body " ; and many are 
 encouraged by the phrase to transgress the laws of health. 
 But Nature quietly suppresses those who treat thus dis- 
 respectfully one of her highest products, and leaves the 
 world to be peopled by the descendants of those who are 
 not so foolish. 
 
 Beyond these immediate mischiefs there are remoter 
 mischiefs. Exclusive devotion to work has the result 
 that amusements cease to please ; and, when relaxation 
 becomes imperative, life becomes dreary from lack of its 
 sole interest — the interest in business. The remark cur- 
 rent in England that, when the American travels, his aim 
 is to do the greatest amount of sight-seeing in the short- 
 est time, I find current here also : it is recognized that 
 the satisfaction of getting on, devours nearly all other 
 satisfactions. When recently at Niagara, which gave ns 
 a whole week's pleasure, I learned from the landlord 
 of the hotel that most Americans come one day and go 
 away the next. Old Froissart, who said of the English 
 of his day that " they take their pleasures sadly after their 
 fashion," v^^ould doubtless, if he lived now, say of the 
 Americans that they take their pleasures hurriedly after 
 their fashion. In large measure with us, and still more 
 with you, there is not that abandonment to the moment 
 which is requisite for full enjoyment ; and this abandon- 
 ment is prevented by the ever-present sense of multitu- 
 
32 THE SPENCER BANQUET. 
 
 dinous responsibilities. So that, beyond the serious phys- 
 ical mischief caused by overwork, there is the further 
 mischief that it destroys what value there would other- 
 wise be in the leisure j^art of life. 
 
 Nor do the evils end here. There is the injury to 
 posterity. Damaged constitutions reappear in children, 
 and entail on them far more of ill than great fortunes 
 yield them of good. When life has been duly rational- 
 ized by science, it will be seen that among a man's duties 
 care of the body is imperative, not only out of regard 
 for personal welfare, but also out of regard for descend- 
 ants. His constitution will be considered as an entailed 
 estate, which he ought to pass on uninjured if not im- 
 proved to those who follow ; and it will be held that 
 millions bequeathed by him will not compensate for 
 feeble health and decreased ability to enjoy life. Once 
 more, there is the injury to fellow-citizens, taking the 
 shape of undue disregard of competitors. I hear that 
 a great trader among you deliberately endeavored to 
 crush out every one whose business competed w^ith his 
 own ; and manifestly the man who, making himself a 
 slave to accumulation, absorbs an inordinate share of the 
 trade or profession he is engaged in, makes life harder 
 for all others engaged in it, and excludes from it many 
 who might otherwise gain competencies. Thus, besides 
 the egoistic motive, there are two altruistic motives which 
 should deter from this excess in work. 
 
 The truth is, there needs a revised ideal of life. Look 
 back through the past, or look abroad through the present, 
 and we find that the ideal of life is variable, and depends 
 on social conditions. Every one knows that to be a suc- 
 cessful warrior v/as the highest aim among all ancient 
 peoples of note, as it is still among many barbarous peo- 
 ples. When we remember that in the Norseman's heaven 
 the time was to be passed in daily battles, with magical 
 
MR. SPENCER'S ADDRESS. 33 
 
 healing of wounds, we see how deeply rooted may become 
 the conception that fighting is man's proper business, 
 and that industry is fit only for slaves and people of low 
 degree. That is to say, when the chronic struggles of 
 races necessitate perpetual wars, there is evolved an ideal 
 of life adapted to the requirements. We have changed 
 all that in modern civilized societies, especially in Eng- 
 land, and still more in America. With the decline of 
 militant activity, and the growth of industrial activity, 
 the occupations once disgraceful have become honorable. 
 The duty to work has taken the place of the duty to 
 fight ; and in the one case, as in the other, the ideal of 
 life has become so well established that scarcely any 
 dream of questioning it. Practically, business has been 
 substituted for war as the purpose of existence. 
 
 Is this modern ideal to survive throughout the future ? 
 I think not. While all other things undergo continuous 
 change, it is impossible that ideals should remain fixed. 
 The ancient ideal was appropriate to the ages of conquest 
 by man over man, and spread of the strongest races. The 
 modern ideal is appropriate to ages in which conquest of 
 the Earth and subjection of the powers of Nature to hu- 
 man use, is the predominant need. But hereafter, when 
 both these ends have in the main been achieved, the ideal 
 formed will probably differ considerably from the present 
 one. May we not foresee the nature of the difference ? 
 I think we may. Some twenty years ago, a good friend 
 of mine and a good friend of yours, too, though you 
 never saw him, John Stuart Mill, delivered at St. An- 
 \lrews an inaugural address on the occasion of his ap- 
 pointment to the Lord Rectorship. It contained much 
 to be admired, as did all he wrote. There ran through 
 it, however, the tacit assumption that life is for learn- 
 ing and working. I felt at the time that I should have 
 liked to take up the opposite thesis. I should have liked 
 
3i THE SPENCER BANQUET. 
 
 to contend that life is not for learning, nor is life for 
 working, but learning and working are for life. The 
 primary use of knowledge is for such guidance of conduct 
 under all circumstances as shall make living complete. 
 All other uses of knowledge are secondary. It scarcely 
 needs saying that the primary use of work is that of sup- 
 plying the materials and aids to living completely ; and 
 that any other uses of work are secondary. But in men's 
 conceptions the secondary has in great measure usurped 
 the place of the primary. The apostle of culture as it is 
 commonly conceived^ Mr. Matthew Arnold, makes little 
 or no reference to the fact that the first use of knowledge 
 is the right ordering of all actions ; and Mr. Carlyle, who 
 is a good exponent of current ideas about work, insists on 
 its virtues for quite other reasons than that it achieves 
 sustentation. We may trace everywhere in human af- 
 fairs a tendency to transform the means into the end. 
 Ail see that the miser does this when, making the accu- 
 mulation of money his sole satisfaction, he forgets that 
 money is of value only to purchase satisfactions. But it 
 is less commonly seen that the like is true of the work 
 by which the money is accumulated — that industry, too, 
 bodily or mental, is but a means, and that it is as irra- 
 tional to pursue it to the exclusion of that complete living 
 it subserves, as it is for the miser to accumulate money 
 and make no use of it. Hereafter, when this age of active 
 material progress has yielded mankind its benefits, there 
 will, I think, come a better adjustment of labor and en- 
 joyment. Among reasons for thinking this, there is the 
 reason that the process of evolution throughout the or- 
 ganic world at large, brings an increasing surplus of en- 
 ergies that are not absorbed in fulfilling material needs, 
 and points to a still larger surplus for humanity of the 
 future. And there are other reasons, which I must pass 
 over. In brief, I may say that we have had somewhat too 
 
PROFESSOR SUMNER'S SPEECH. 35 
 
 much of " the gospel of work." It is time to preach the 
 gospel of relaxation. 
 
 This is a very unconventional after-dinner speech. 
 Especially it will be thought strange that in returning 
 thanks I should deliver something very much like a hom- 
 ily. But I have thought I could not better convey my 
 thanks than by the expression of a sympathy which issues 
 in a fear. If, as I gather, this intemperance in work af- 
 fects more especially the Anglo-American part of the 
 population — if there results an undermining of the phy- 
 sique not only in adults, but also in the young, who, as 
 I learn from your daily journals, are also being injured 
 by overwork — if the ultimate consequence should be a 
 dwindling away of those among you who are the inheri- 
 tors of free institutions and best adapted to them ; then 
 there will come a further difficulty in the working out of 
 that great future which lies before the American nation. 
 To my anxiety on this account, you must please ascribe 
 the unusual character of my remarks. 
 
 And now I must bid you farewell. When I sail by 
 the Germanic on Saturday, I shall bear with me pleasant 
 remembrances of my intercourse with many Americans, 
 joined with regrets that my state of health has prevented 
 me from seeing a larger number. 
 
 PROFESSOR SUMNER'S SPEECH. 
 
 The chairman next introduced Professor W. G. Sum- 
 ner, of Yale College, who responded to a toast in honor 
 of " Tlie Science of Sociology P He said : 
 
 In the present state of the science of sociology the 
 man who has studied it at all is very sure to feel great 
 self -distrust in trying to talk about it. The most that 
 
36 THE SPENCER BANQUET. 
 
 one of us can do at the present time is to appreciate the 
 promise which the science offers to us, and to understand 
 the lines of direction in which it seems about to open out. 
 As for the philosophy of the subject, we still need the 
 master to show us how to handle and apply its most fun- 
 damental doctrines. I have the feeling all the time, in 
 studying and teaching sociology, that I have not mastered 
 it yet in such a way as to be able to proceed in it with 
 good confidence in my own steps. I have only got so far 
 as to have an almost overpov/ering conviction of the ne- 
 cessity and value of the study of that science. 
 
 Mr. Spencer addressed himself at the outset of his 
 literary career to topics of sociology. In the pursuit of 
 those topics he found himself forced (as I understand it) 
 to seek constantly more fundamental and wider philoso23h- 
 ical doctrines. He came at last to fundamental principles 
 of the evolution philosophy. He then extended, tested, 
 confirmed, and corrected these principles by inductions 
 from other sciences, and so finally turned again to soci- 
 ology, armed with the scientific method which he had ac- 
 quired. To .win a powerful and correct method is, as we 
 all know, to win more than half the battle. When so 
 much is secured, the question of making the discoveries, 
 solving the problems, eliminating the errors, and testing 
 the results, is only a question of time and of strength to 
 collect and master the data. 
 
 We have now acquired the method of studying soci- 
 ology scientifically so as to attain to assured results. We 
 have acquired it none too soon. The need for a science 
 of life in society is urgent, and it is increasing every year. 
 It is a fact which is generally overlooked that the great 
 advance in the sciences and the arts which has taken place 
 during the last century is producing social consequences 
 and giving rise to social problems. We are accustomed 
 to dwell upon the discoveries of science and the develop- 
 
PROFESSOR SUMNER'S SPEECH. 37 
 
 ment of the arts as simple incidents, complete in them- 
 selves, which offer only grounds for congratulation. But 
 the steps which have been won are by no means simple 
 events. Each one has consequences which reach beyond 
 the domain of physical power into social and moral rela- 
 tions, and these effects are multiplied and reproduced by 
 combination with each other. The great discoveries and 
 inventions redistribute population. They reconstruct in- 
 dustries and force new organization of commerce and 
 finance. They bring new employments into existence 
 and render other employments obsolete, while they change 
 the relative value of many others. They overthrow the 
 old order of society, impoverishing some classes and en- 
 riching others. They render old political traditions gro- 
 tesque and ridiculous, and make old maxims of statecraft 
 null and empty. They give old vices of human nature a 
 chance to parade in new masks, so that it demands new 
 skill to detect the same old foes. They produce a kind 
 of social chaos in which contradictory social and economic 
 phenomena appear side by side to bewilder and deceive 
 the student who is not fully armed to deal with them. 
 New interests are brought into existence, and new faiths, 
 ideas, and hopes, are engendered in the minds of men. 
 Some of these are doubtless good and sound ; others are 
 delusive ; in every case a competent criticism is of the 
 first necessity. In the upheaval of society which is going 
 on, classes and groups are thrown against each other in 
 such a way as to produce class hatreds and hostilities. 
 As the old national jealousies, which used to be the lines 
 on which war was waged, lose . their distinctness, class 
 jealousies threaten to take their place. Political and so- 
 cial events which occur on one side of the globe now 
 affect the interests of population on the other side of the 
 globe. Forces which come into action in one part of hu- 
 man society rest not until they have reached all human 
 
38 THE SPENCER BANQUET. 
 
 society. The brotherhood of man is coming to be a real- 
 ity of such distinct and positive character that we find it 
 a practical question of the greatest moment what kind of 
 creatures some of these hitherto neglected brethren are. 
 Secondary and remoter effects of industrial changes, 
 which were formerly dissipated and lost in the delay and 
 friction of communication, are now, by our prompt and 
 delicate mechanism of communication, caught up and 
 transmitted through society. 
 
 It is plain that our social science is not on the level 
 of the tasks which are thrown upon it by the vast and 
 sudden changes in the whole mechanism by which man 
 makes the resources of the globe available to satisfy his 
 needs, and by the new ideas which are born of the new 
 aspects which human life bears to our eyes in consequence 
 of the development of science and the arts. Our tradi- 
 tions about the science and art of living are plainly inade- 
 quate. They break to pieces in our hands when we try 
 to apply them to the new cases. A man of good faith 
 may come to the conviction sadly, but he must come to 
 the conviction honestly, that the traditional doctrines and 
 explanations of human life are worthless. 
 
 A progress which is not symmetrical is not true ; that 
 is to say, every branch of human interest must be devel- 
 oped proportionately to all the other branches, else the 
 one which remains in arrears will measure the advance 
 which may be won by the whole. If, then, we can not 
 produce a science of life in society which is broad enough 
 to solve all the new social problems which are now forced 
 upon us by the development of science and art, we shall 
 find that the achievements of science and art will be over- 
 whelmed by social reactions and convulsions. 
 
 We do not lack for attempts of one kind and another 
 to satisfy the need which I have described. Our discus- 
 sion is in excess of our deliberation, and our deliberation 
 
PROFESSOR SUMNER'S SPEECH. 39 
 
 is in excess of our information. Our journals, platforms, 
 pulpits, and parliaments are full of talking and writing 
 about topics of sociology. The only result, however, of 
 all this discussion is to show that there are half a dozen 
 arbitrary codes of morals, a heterogeneous tangle of eco- 
 nomic doctrines, a score of religious creeds and ecclesias- 
 tical traditions, and a confused jumble of humanitarian 
 and sentimental notions which jostle each other in the 
 brains of the men of this generation. It is astonishing to 
 watch a discussion and to see how a disputant, starting 
 from a given point of view, will run along on one line of 
 thought until he encounters some fragment of another 
 code or doctrine, which he has derived from some other 
 source of education ; whereupon he turns at an angle, 
 and goes on in a new course until he finds himself face to 
 face with another of his old prepossessions. What we 
 need is adequate criteria by which to make the necessary 
 tests and classifications, and appropriate canons of pro- 
 cedure, or the adaptation of universal canons to the spe- 
 cial tasks of sociology. 
 
 Unquestionably it is to the great philosophy which 
 has now been established by such ample induction in the 
 experimental sciences, and which offers to man such new 
 command of all the relations of life, that we must look 
 for the establishment of the guiding lines in the study of 
 sociology. I can see no boundaries to the scope of the 
 philosophy of evolution. That philosophy is sure to em- 
 brace all the interests of man on this earth. It will be 
 one of its crowning triumphs to bring light and order into 
 the social problems which are of universal bearing on all 
 mankind. Mr. Spencer is breaking the path for us into 
 this domain. We stand eager to follow him into it, and 
 we look upon his work on sociology as a grand step in the 
 history of science. When, therefore, we express our ear- 
 nest hope that Mr. Spencer may have health and strength 
 
40 THE SPENCER BANQUET. 
 
 to bring his work to a speedy conclusion, we not only ex- 
 press our personal respect and good-will for himself, but 
 also our sympathy with what, I doubt not, is the warmest 
 wish of his own heart, and our appreciation of his great 
 services to true science and to the welfare of mankind. 
 
 REMARKS OF MR. SCHURZ. 
 
 Mk. Gael Schurz responded to the toast, " The prog- 
 ress of science tends to international harmony." He 
 said : 
 
 Mr. Chaieman and Gentlemen : Two things which 
 fell from the lips of the first two speakers struck me as 
 remarkably pertinent to our present situation. One was 
 the proverb of the Amazulus, quoted by our worthy 
 chairman, that " a stuffed body sees not secret things " ; 
 and, great orator as he is, he did not fail to accompany 
 the saying with the illustration of example. (Laughter.) 
 The other was the remark which formed the text of the 
 eloquent address of our honored guest, Mr. SiDcncer, that 
 too great continuity and intensity of work, as observed 
 in this country, will be apt to break down the best phys- 
 ical constitution ; and I am exceedingly sorry to see that, 
 in this respect, he himself appears much more like an 
 American than like an Englishman. (Great applause.) 
 I sincerely hope that, when he returns to his country, he 
 will permit his incessant labors for the benefit of hu- 
 manity to be sometimes interrupted by due relaxation. 
 (Applause.) Profiting from the wisdom we have listened 
 to, I shall turn round the Amazulu proverb, and follow 
 Mr. Spencer's impressive advice in saying that, in my 
 opinion, and according to general experience, any serious 
 effort at profound philosophical thought or scientific in- 
 
REMARKS OF MR. SCHURZ. 41 
 
 quiry, immediately after a good dinner, must be injurious 
 to a man's health. (Applause.) Considering that I have 
 a family to support, and various other duties to perform, 
 which make a vigorous physical condition desirable, I 
 shall, whatever others may do, in this respect try to take 
 care of myself. (Laughter.) Do not understand me, 
 however, as meaning to discourage any one of you, gen- 
 tlemen. Everybody must be left to be the judge of 
 his own conduct, upon his own responsibility. Herbert 
 Spencer never spoke a wiser word than when he said, 
 " The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of 
 their folly is to fill the world with "—he bluntly said — 
 "fools," but I will only say, "with dyspeptic philoso- 
 phers." (Laughter and applause.) Leaving, therefore, 
 the discussion of deep philosophical and scientific prob- 
 lems to others more reckless of their physical well-being, 
 I shall prefer to call up some pleasant memories which 
 this interesting occasion brings to my mind. Nineteen 
 years ago, after the battle of Missionary Ridge and an 
 expedition to Knoxville for the relief of Burnside, I was 
 with my command in a winter camp near Chattanooga, 
 where, for some time, our horses suffered so much from 
 want of food that many of them died, and where we had, 
 at times, not salt enough to make our meat and crackers 
 palatable. But I had Herbert Spencer's " Social Statics " 
 with me, which, in the long winter nights in my tent, I 
 read by the light of a tallow-candle, and in which I found 
 at least an abundance of mental salt to make up for the 
 painful absence of the material article. (Applause.) For 
 the delightful luxury of thus enjoying quiet philosophical 
 meditation at the hand of such a guide, in the midst of 
 the scenes of war, I have been grateful to Mr. Spencer 
 ever since. (Applause.) Moreover, it became perfectly 
 clear to my mind that, if the people of the South had well 
 studied and thoroughly digested that book, there would 
 
42 THE SPENCER BANQUET. 
 
 never have been any war for the preservation of slavery 
 (applause) — and that, since they had not read and di- 
 gested it, it was our bounden duty to hammer the first 
 principles of the " Social Statics " — namely, that " every 
 man has freedom to do all that he wills, provided he in- 
 fringes not the equal freedom of any other man " — (ap- 
 plause) — into the slaveholders' heads to the best of our 
 ability. This was done, and the effect was good. (Ap-*- 
 plause.) That first principle is now more and more gen- 
 erally understood in this country, and the more generally 
 it is appreciated the less occasion there will be for our- 
 selves and our descendants to study the " Social Statics " 
 in a camp of war again. (Applause.) 
 
 As I am supposed to respond to a sentiment touching 
 the influence of the progress of science on the intercourse 
 of nations, I may say that it strikes me as a common-sense 
 view of the matter — and, as you know, Mr. Chairman, 
 common-sense is often the most deceptive disguise of 
 ignorance (laughter) — that the effect of that progress 
 upon the relations of different peoples is very much the 
 same that it is upon the relations of different portions of 
 one people, or of different individuals. I shall not disre- 
 gard my own warning as to the overstraining of our men- 
 tal faculties immediately after dinner when I lay down 
 the proposition that — given a certain number of subjects 
 of discussion between different nations, or different indi- 
 viduals — if the i^rogress of science, or of philosophical en- 
 lightenment, increases the number of things upon which 
 they agree, it reduces, in the same measure, the number 
 of things upon which they disagree (laughter) ; and thus 
 it carries them forward in the direction of general good 
 understanding and harmony. (Laughter and applause.) 
 And if that progress, as is likely to be the case, increases 
 the number of subjects of discussion, and teaches us, at 
 the same time, how to dispose of them by peaceful and 
 
REMARKS OF MR. SCIIURZ. 43 
 
 amicable reasoning, it will, to that extent, prevent us 
 from coming to blows. (Applause.) These propositions, 
 although simple, seem to me conclusive, and I feel very 
 much like claiming for them the right of original dis- 
 covery. (Laughter.) 
 
 I take it, also, that the end of science and of philoso- 
 phy is not merely to enlighten the minds, but also ulti- 
 mately to influence the conduct, of men, and not only the 
 conduct of a few, but the conduct of the many. And to 
 that end it should make itself understood by the many. 
 The direct effect upon mankind will grow in strength 
 and extent as science and philosophy are poj)ularized in 
 the best sense of the term, and thereby become more cos- 
 mopolitan. (Applause.) 
 
 There was a time when the investigations of science 
 and their results were kept in the possession of privi- 
 leged orders or circles, and treated as profound mysteries 
 which could not be exposed to the gaze and the under- 
 standing of the multitude without profanation and with- 
 out endangering the tixed order of society. That time 
 lies, fortunately, far behind us. But some of us can remem- 
 ber the day when philosophy and science were, by many 
 at least, studiously clothed in the darkness of formidable 
 terminologies and obscure forms of speech, which seemed 
 to warn off all the uninitiated. It was here and there 
 considered unprofessional, and it exposed the man of sci- 
 ence and the philosopher to the charge of superficiality, 
 if he discussed scientific and philosophical subjects in a 
 language easily intelligible to the rest of mankind. I 
 know of works of that sort professedly written in Ger- 
 man, but requiring translation into German almost as 
 much as if they had been written in Sanskrit. (Laugh- 
 ter.) And of some works written in other languages the 
 same might be said. They tell an anecdote of a great 
 philosopher who, on his death-bed, complained that of all 
 
44 THE SPENCER BANQUET. 
 
 his pupils only one had understood him, and that one had 
 decidedly misunderstood him. (Laughter.) How great 
 the misfortune was has probably never been ascertained. 
 Perhaps the loss caused by the misunderstanding was not 
 without compensation, as I have been told of a philosoph- 
 ical book of the obscure kind which was translated from 
 one language into another, and some of the original 
 thoughts of which were rather improved by the mistakes 
 of the intelligent translator. (Laughter.) 
 
 We may certainly congratulate ourselves upon the 
 fact that in our days, among men of science and philoso- 
 phers, a tendency has grown up to take the generality of 
 intelligent mankind into their confidence by speaking to 
 them in a human language ; and also a tendency vastly 
 to enlarge the range of their immediate usefulness by 
 applying the truths discovered by them directly and 
 practically to all the relations and problems of actual life. 
 (Applause.) And surely it can not be said that, by thus 
 being made popular and cosmopolitan, science and phi- 
 losophy have lost in depth and become superficial. On 
 the contrary, it is an unquestionable fact that the same 
 period which is marked by the popularization of science 
 and philosophy is equally remarkable for its wonderful 
 fertility in scientific discovery, mechanical invention, and 
 philosophical generalization of the highest value. (Ap- 
 plause.) We have gained in depth and surface at the 
 same time. (Applause.) Kor is this at all surprising. 
 For, the greater the number of minds that are reached by 
 new ideas, the greater will be the quantity and variety 
 of new intellectual forces that w^ill be inspired and stimu- 
 lated into creative activity. (Applause.) 
 
 I am confident, gentlemen, I express your sentiments 
 as well as my own when I say that, in the man who to- 
 night honors and delights us with his presence, we greet 
 one of the greatest representatives of that democratic 
 
ADDRESS or PROFESSOR MARSH. 45 
 
 tendency (applause) ; one of the boldest leaders of that 
 pliilosophy that bursts the bonds of the closet (applause) ; 
 one of the foremost builders up of science in the largest 
 sense by establishing the relations of facts (applause) ; 
 the apostle of the principle of evolution, which Darwin 
 showed in the diversity of organic life, but which Spencer 
 unfolded as a universal law governing all physiological, 
 mental, and social phenomena (applause) ; a hero of 
 thought (great applause), devoting his powers and his 
 life to the vindication of the divine right of science against 
 the intolerant authority of traditional belief (applause) ; 
 an indefatigable diver into the profoundest depths of 
 ideas and things, who has also known how to bring the 
 discovered treasures within the reach of every intelligent 
 mind (applause), and who has thus become one of the 
 great teachers, not merely of a school, but of civilized 
 humanity. (Applause.) 
 
 Among us he has come in search of rest and recreation, 
 and I trust it will be to him a cheering satisfaction to 
 know that, far from being a stranger with us, he has even 
 among this youngest and busiest and most nervous of 
 peoples, multitudes of devoted pupils and admirers, of 
 whom the friends here present are a respectful but only 
 a feeble representation. (Applause.) 
 
 ADDRESS OF PKOFESSOR MARSH. 
 
 Me. Evarts next called upon Professor O. C. Marsh, 
 of Yale College, acting president of the National Acad- 
 emy of Sciences, to respond to the following toast : 
 ^' Bivolution — once an Hypothesis^ now the Established 
 Doctrine of the Scientific WorkV Professor Marsh 
 said : 
 
46 THE SPENCER BANQUET. 
 
 Mr. President and Gentlemen : In meeting here 
 to-night, to do honor to our distinguished guest, who is 
 one of the great apostles of Evolution, it seems especially 
 fitting to the occasion that we should, for a moment at 
 least, glance back to the past, and recall briefly the prog- 
 ress of a doctrine which has so rapidly brought about a 
 revolution in scientific thought. 
 
 Modern science and its methods may be said to date 
 back only to the beginning of the present century ; and 
 at this time the first scientific theory of organic evolution 
 was advanced by Lamarck. During the twenty centuries 
 before, a few far-seeing men, from Aristotle to Buffon, 
 seem to have had glimpses of the light, but the dense 
 ignorance and superstition which surrounded them soon 
 enveloped it again in darkness. 
 
 Before the beginning of the present century, it was 
 impossible for evolution to find a general acceptance, as 
 the amount of scientific knowledge then accumulated was 
 too small to sustain it. Hence, the various writers be- 
 fore Lamarck who had suggested hypotheses of develop- 
 ment had based them upon general reasoning, or upon 
 facts too scanty to withstand the objections naturally 
 urged against new ideas. 
 
 With the opening of the nineteenth century, however, 
 the new era in science began. Here, at the very begin- 
 ning, the names of Cuvier and Lamarck stand forth pre- 
 eminent ; and the progress of natural science from that 
 day to the present is largely due to their labors. Cuvier 
 laid the foundation of the study of vertebrate animals, 
 living and extinct, but with all his vast knowledge he v/as 
 enslaved by the traditions of the past. Although the evi- 
 dence was before him, pointing directly to evolution, he 
 gave the authority of his great name in favor of the per- 
 manence of species. 
 
 Lamarck made a special study of invertebrate animals, 
 
ADDRESS OF PROFESSOR MARSH. 4Y 
 
 and his investigations soon led him to the belief that liv- 
 ing species were descended from those now extinct. In 
 this conclusion he found the germ of a theory of develop- 
 ment, which he advocated earnestly and philosophically, 
 and thus prepared the way for the doctrine of evolution, 
 as we know it to-day. 
 
 The methods of scientific investigation introduced by 
 Cuvier and Lamarck had already brought to light a vast 
 array of facts which could not otherwise have been ac- 
 cumulated, and these rendered the establishment of the 
 doctrine of evolution for the first time possible. But the 
 time was not yet ripe. Cuvier opposed the new idea 
 with all his authority. The great contest between him 
 and Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, the strongest advocate of La- 
 marck's views, is well known. Authority, which in the 
 past had been so powerful in defense of tradition and creed, 
 still held sway, and, through its influence, evolution was 
 pronounced to be without foundation. This triumph of 
 Cuvier delayed the progress of evolution for half a century. 
 
 During this period, however, the advance in all de- 
 partments of science was constant, and the mass of facts 
 brought together was continually suggesting new lines of 
 research, and new solutions of old problems. In geology, 
 the old idea of catastrophes was gradually replaced by 
 that of uniform changes still in progress ; but the corol- 
 lary to this proposition, that life, also, had been continu- 
 ous on the earth, was as yet only suggested. In the phys- 
 ical world the great law of the correlation of forces had 
 been advanced, and received with favor ; but, in the or- 
 ganic world, the miraculous creation of each separate 
 species was firmly believed by the great mass of educated 
 men. The very recent appearance of man on the earth 
 and his creation independent of the rest of the animal 
 kingdom were scarcely questioned at the close of the first 
 half of the present century. 
 
48 THE SPENCEE BANQUET. 
 
 When the second half of the century began, the accu- 
 mulation of scientific knowledge was sufficient for the 
 foundation of a doctrine of evolution which no authority 
 could suppress and no objections overthrow. The ma- 
 terials on which it was to be based were not preserved 
 alone in the great centers of scientific thought, but a 
 thousand quiet workers in science, many of them in re- 
 mote localities, had now the facts before them to suggest 
 a solution of that mystery of mysteries, the Origin of 
 Species. 
 
 In the first decade of the present half-century, Darwin, 
 Wallace, Huxley, and our honored guest, were all at the 
 same time working at one problem, each in his own way, 
 and their united efforts have firmly established the truth 
 of organic evolution. Our guest to-night did not stop to 
 solve the difficulties of organic evolution, but, with that 
 profound philosophic insight which has made him read and 
 honored by all intelligent men, he made the grand gen- 
 eralization that the law of organic progress is the law of 
 all progress. To show how clearly, even in the begin- 
 ning, he comprehended this great truth, let me recall to 
 you one sentence which he wrote five-and-twenty years 
 ago: 
 
 " This law of organic progress is the law of all prog- 
 ress. Whether it be in the development of the earth, in 
 the development of life upon its surface, in the develop- 
 ment of society, of government, of manufactures, of com- 
 merce, of language, literature, science, art, this same evo- 
 lution of the simple into the complex, through a process 
 of continuous differentiation, holds throughout." 
 
 How completely the truth of this statement has since 
 been established you all know full well. 
 
 The evolution of life and of the physical world are 
 now supplemented by the evolution of philosophy, of his- 
 tory, of society, and of all else pertaining to human life, 
 
ADDRESS OF PROFESSOR MARSH. 49 
 
 until we may say that evolution is the law of all prog- 
 ress, if not the key to all mysteries. These profounder 
 departments of evolution I leave to others, for, in the 
 few minutes allotted to me, I can not attempt to give 
 even an outline of the progress of evolution in biology 
 alone. 
 
 If, however, I may venture to answer briefly the ques- 
 tion, What of evolution to-day ? I can only reply : the 
 battle has been fought and won. A few stragglers on 
 each side may still keep up a scattered fire, but the con- 
 test is over, and the victors have moved on to other 
 fields. 
 
 As to the origin of species, once thought to be the key 
 to the position, no working naturalist of to-day who sees 
 the great problems of life opening one after another be- 
 fore him will waste time in discussing a question already 
 solved. This question, so long regarded as beyond solu- 
 tion, has been worked out by that greatest of naturalists, 
 whose genius all intelligent men now recognize, and 
 whose recent loss the whole civilized world deplores. 
 
 Not only do we know to-day that species are not per- 
 manent, but every phase of life bears witness to the same 
 general law of change. Genera, families, and the higher 
 groups of animals and plants are now regarded merely as 
 convenient terms to mark progress, which may be altered 
 by any new discovery. 
 
 All existing life on the earth is now believed to be 
 connected directly with that of the distant past, and one 
 problem to-day is to trace out the lines of descent. Here 
 embryology and paleontology work together, and the re- 
 sults already secured are most important. The genealo- 
 gies of some of the animals now living have been made 
 out with a degree of certainty that amounts to a demon- 
 stration, and others must rapidly follow. 
 
 In this, and in all other departments of natural science, 
 
50 THE SPENCER BANQUET. 
 
 the doctrine of evolution has brought light out of dark- 
 ness, and marks out the path of future progress. What 
 the law of gravitation is to astronomy, the law of evolu- 
 tion is now to natural science. Evolution is no longer a 
 theory, but a demonstrated truth, accepted by naturalists 
 throughout the world. 
 
 The most encouraging feature in natural science, in- 
 deed, in all science, to-day, is the spirit in which the work 
 is carried on. No authority is recognized which forbids 
 the investigation of any question, however profound ; 
 and, with that confidence which success justly brings, no 
 question within the domain of science is now believed to 
 be insoluble ; not even the grand problems now before 
 us — ^the antiquity of the hu,man race, the origin of man, 
 or even the origin of life itself. 
 
 MR. FISKE'S SPEECH. 
 
 Mk. Evarts then announced as the next toast : " E'do- 
 lution and Religion : that which perfects humanity can 
 not destroy religion^'' to which, as it was a double toast, 
 he said there would be a duet of speakers to respond. 
 The first of these was Mr. John Fiske, of Cambridge, 
 who spoke as follows : 
 
 Me. President and Gentlemen : The thought which 
 you have uttered suggests so many and such fruitful 
 themes of discussion, that a whole evening would not suf- 
 fice to enumerate them, while to illustrate them properly 
 would seem to require an octavo volume rather than a talk 
 of six or eight minutes, especially when such a talk comes 
 just after dinner. The Amazulu saying which you have 
 cited, that those who have " stuffed bodies " can not see 
 hidden things, seems peculiarly applicable to any attempt 
 
- ME. FISKE'S SPEECH. 51 
 
 to discuss the mysteries of religion at the present mo- 
 ment ; and, after the additional warning we have just 
 had from our good friend Mr. Schurz, I hardly know 
 whether I ought to venture to approach so vast a theme. 
 There are one or two points of signal importance, how- 
 ever, to which I may at least call attention for a mo- 
 ment. It is a matter which has long since taken deep 
 hold of my mind, and I am glad to have a chance to say 
 something about it on so fitting an occasion. We have 
 met here this evening to do homage to a dear and noble 
 teacher and friend, and it is well that we should choose 
 this time to recall the various aspects of the immortal 
 work by which he has earned the gratitude of a world. 
 The work which Herbert Spencer has done in organizing 
 the different departments of human knowledge, so as to 
 present the widest generalizations of all the sciences in a 
 new and wonderful light, as flowing out of still deeper 
 and wider truths concerning the universe as a whole ; the 
 great number of profound generalizations which he has 
 established incidentally to the pursuit of this main ob- 
 ject ; the endlessly rich and suggestive thoughts which he 
 has thrown out in such profusion by the wayside all along 
 the course of this great philosophical enterprise — all this 
 work is so manifest that none can fail to recognize it. It 
 is work of the caliber of that which Aristotle and IN'ew- 
 ton did ; though coming in this latter age, it as far sur- 
 passes their work in its vastness of performance as the 
 railway surpasses the sedan-chair, or as the telegraph sur- 
 passes the carrier-pigeon. 
 
 But it is not of this side of our teacher's work that I 
 wish to speak, but of a side of it that has, hitherto, met 
 with less general recognition. There are some people 
 who seem to think that it is not enough that Mr. Spen- 
 cer should have made all these priceless contributions to 
 human knowledge, but actually complain of him for not 
 
52 THE SPENCER BANQUET. 
 
 giving us a complete and exhaustive system of theology 
 into the bargain. What I wish, therefore, to point out 
 is that Mr. Spencer's work on the side of religion will be 
 seen to be no less important than his work on the side of 
 science, when once its religious implications shall have 
 been fully and consistently unfolded. 
 
 If we look at all the systems or forms of religion of 
 which we have any knowledge, we shall find that they 
 differ in many superficial features. They differ in many 
 of the transcendental doctrines which they respectively 
 preach, and in many of the rules of conduct which they 
 respectively lay down for men's guidance. They assert 
 different things about the universe, and they enjoin or 
 prohibit different kinds of behavior on the part of their 
 followers. The doctrine of the Trinity, which to many 
 Christians is the most sacred of mysteries, is to all Mu- 
 hammadans the foulest of blasphemies ; the Brahman's 
 conscience would be more troubled if he were to kill a 
 cow by accident than if he were to swear to a lie or steal 
 a purse ; the Turk, who sees no wrong in bigamy, would 
 shrink from the sin of eating pork. But, amid all such 
 surface differences, we find throughout all known relig- 
 ions two points of substantial agreement. And these two 
 points of agreement will be admitted by modern civilized 
 men to be of far greater importance than the innumerable 
 differences of detail. All religions agree in the two fol- 
 lowing assertions, one of which is of speculative and one 
 of which is of ethical import. One of them serves to sus- 
 tain and harmonize our thoughts about the world we live 
 in and our place in that world ; the other serves to up- 
 hold us in our efforts to do each what we can to make 
 human life more sweet, more full of goodness and beauty, 
 than we find it. The first of these assertions is the prop- 
 osition that the things and events of the world do not 
 exist or occur blindly or irrelevantly, but that all, from 
 
MR. FISKE'S SPEECH. 53 
 
 the beginning to the end of time, and throughout the 
 furthest sweep of illimitable space, are connected to- 
 gether as the orderly manifestations of a divine Power, 
 and that this divine Power is something outside of our- 
 selves, and upon it our own existence from moment to 
 moment depends. The second of these assertions is the 
 proposition that men ought to do certain things, and 
 ought to refrain from doing certain other things ; and 
 that the reason why some things are wrong to do and 
 other things are right to do is in some mysterious but 
 very real way connected with the existence and nature 
 of this divine Power, which reveals itself in every great 
 and every tiny thing, without which not a star courses 
 in its mighty orbit, and not a sparrow falls to the ground. 
 Matthew Arnold once summed up these two propositions 
 very well when he defined God as "an eternal Power, 
 not ourselves, that makes for righteousness." This two- 
 fold assertion, that there is an eternal Power that is not 
 ourselves, and that this Power makes for righteousness, 
 is to be found, either in a rudimentary or in a highly de- 
 veloped state, in all known religions. In such religions 
 as those of the Eskimos or of your friends the Amazulus, 
 Mr. President, this assertion is found in a rudimentary 
 shape on each of its two sides — the speculative side and 
 the ethical side ; in such religions as Buddhism or Juda- 
 ism it is found in a highly developed shape on both its 
 sides. But the main point is, that in all religions you 
 find it in some shape or other. 
 
 I said, a moment ago, that modern civilized men will 
 all acknowledge that this two-sided assertion, in which 
 all religions agree, is of far greater importance than any 
 of the superficial points in which religions differ. It is 
 really of much more concern to us that there is an eternal 
 Power, not ourselves, that makes for righteousness, than 
 that such a Power is onefold or threefold in its meta- 
 
54 THE SPENCER BANQUET. 
 
 physical nature, or that we ought not to play cards on 
 Sunday, or to eat meat on Friday. No one, I believe, 
 will deny so simple and clear a statement as this. But it 
 is not only we modern men, who call ourselves enlight- 
 ened, that will agree to this. I doubt not even the nar- 
 row-minded bigots of days now happily gone by would 
 have been made to agree to it if they could have had 
 some doggedly persistent Sokrates to cross-question them. 
 Calvin was willing to burn Servetus for doubting the doc- 
 trine of the Trinity, but I do not suppose that even Cal- 
 vin would have argued that the belief in God's threefold 
 nature was more fundamental than the belief in his exist- 
 ence and his goodness. The philosophical error with him 
 was, that he could not dissociate the less important doctrine 
 from the more important doctrine, and the fate of the lat- 
 ter seemed to him wrapped up with the fate of the former. 
 I cite this merely as a typical example. What men in 
 past times have really valued in their religion has been 
 the universal twofold assertion that there is a God who 
 is pleased by the sight of the just man and is angry with 
 the wicked every day ; and when men have fought with 
 one another, and murdered or calumniated one another 
 for heresy about the Trinity or about eating meat on Fri- 
 day, it has been because they have supposed belief in the 
 non-essential doctrines to be inseparably connected with 
 belief in the essential doctrine. In spite of all this, how- 
 ever, it is true that in the mind of the uncivilized man 
 the great central truths of religion are so densely overlaid 
 with hundreds of trivial notions respecting dogma and 
 ritual, that his perception of the great central truths is 
 obscure. These great central truths, indeed, need to be 
 clothed in a dress of little rites and superstitions in order 
 to take hold of his dull and untrained intelligence. But 
 in proportion as men become more civilized, and learn to 
 think more accurately, and to take wider views of life. 
 
MR. FISKE'S SPEECH. 55 
 
 just SO do they come to value the essential truths of relig- 
 ion more highly, while they attach less and less impor- 
 tance to superficial details. 
 
 Having thus seen what is meant by the essential truths 
 of religion, it is very easy to see what the attitude of the 
 doctrine of evolution IkS toward these essential truths. It 
 asserts and reiterates them both ; and it asserts them not 
 as dogmas handed down to us by priestly tradition, not 
 as mysterious intuitive convictions of which we can ren- 
 der no intelligible account to ourselves, but as scientific 
 truths concerniDg the innermost constitution of the uni- 
 verse — truths that have been disclosed by observation and 
 reflection, like other scientific truths, and that accordingly 
 harmonize naturally and easily with the whole body of 
 our knowledge. The doctrine of evolution asserts, as the 
 widest and deepest truth which the study of Nature can 
 disclose to us, that there exists a Power to which no limit 
 in time or space is conceivable, and that all the phenomena 
 of the universe, whether they be what we call material 
 or what we call spiritual phenomena, are manifestations 
 of this infinite and eternal Power. Now, this assertion, 
 which Mr. Spencer has so elaborately set forth as a scien- 
 tific truth — nay, as the ultimate truth of science, as the 
 truth upon which the whole structure of human knowl- 
 edge philosophically rests — this assertion is identical with 
 the assertion of an eternal Power, not ourselves, that 
 forms the speculative basis of all religions. When Car- 
 lyle speaks of the universe as in very truth the star-domed 
 city of God, and reminds us that through every crystal 
 and through every grass-blade, but most through every 
 living soul, the glory of a present God still beams, he 
 means pretty much the same thing that Mr. Spencer means, 
 save that he speaks with the language of poetry, with lan- 
 guage colored by emotion, and not with the precise, for- 
 mal, and colorless language of science. By many critics 
 
56 THE SPENX^ER BANQUET. 
 
 who forget that names are but the counters rather than 
 the hard money of thought, objections have been raised 
 to the use of such a phrase as the Unknowable whereby 
 to describe the power that is manifested in every event 
 of the universe. Yet, when the Hebrew prophet declared 
 that " by him were laid the foundations of the deep," but 
 reminded us "Who by searching can find him out?" he 
 meant pretty much what Mr. Spencer means when he 
 speaks of a Power that is inscrutable in itself, yet is re- 
 vealed from moment to moment in every throb of the 
 mighty rhythmic life of the universe. 
 
 And this brings me to the last and most important 
 point of all. What says the doctrine of evolution with 
 regard to the ethical side of this twofold assertion that 
 lies at the bottom of all religion ? Though we can not 
 fathom the nature of the inscrutable Power that animates 
 the world, we know, nevertheless, a great many things 
 that it does. Does this eternal Power, then, work for 
 righteousness ? Is there a divine sanction for holiness 
 and a divine condemnation for sin ? Are the principles 
 of right-living really connected with the intimate consti- 
 tution of the universe ? If the answer of science to these 
 questions be affirmative, then the agreement with religion 
 is complete, both on the speculative and on the practical 
 sides ; and that phantom which has been the abiding ter- 
 ror of timid and superficial minds — that phantom of the 
 hostility between religion and science — is exorcised now 
 and for ever. 
 
 Now, science began to return a decisively affirmative 
 answer to such questions as these when it began, with Mr. 
 Spencer, to explain moral beliefs and moral sentiments as 
 products of evolution. For clearly, when you say of a 
 moral belief or a moral sentiment that it is a product of 
 evolution, you imply that it is something which the uni- 
 verse through untold ages has been laboring to bring 
 
MR. FISKE'S SPEECH. 57 
 
 forth, and you ascribe to it a value proportionate to the 
 enormous effort that it has cost to produce it. Still more, 
 when with Mr. Spencer we study the principles of right- 
 living as part and parcel of the whole doctrine of the de- 
 velopment of life upon the earth ; when we see that in 
 an ultimate analysis that is right which tends to enhance 
 fullness of life, and that is wrong which tends to detract 
 from fullness of life — we then see that the distinction be- 
 tween right and wrong is rooted in the deepest founda- 
 tions of the universe ; we see that the very same forces, 
 subtle, and exquisite, and profound, which brought upon 
 the scene the primal germs of life and caused them to 
 unfold, which through countless ages of struggle and 
 death have cherished the life that could live more per- 
 fectly and destroyed the life that could only live less per- 
 fectly, until humanity, with all its hopes, and fears, and 
 aspirations, has come into being as the crown of all this 
 stupendous work — we see that these very same subtle and 
 exquisite forces have wrought into the very fibers of the 
 universe those principles of right-living which it is man's 
 highest function to put into practice. The theoretical 
 sanction thus given to right-living is incomparably the 
 most powerful that has ever been assigned in any phi- 
 losophy of ethics. Human responsibility is made more 
 strict and solemn than ever, when the eternal Power that 
 lives in every event of the universe is thus seen to be in 
 the deepest possible sense the author of the moral law 
 that should guide our lives, and in obedience to which 
 lies our only guarantee of the happiness which is incor- 
 ruptible — which neither inevitable misfortune nor un- 
 merited obloquy can ever take away. 
 
 I have here but barely touched upon a rich and sug- 
 gestive topic. When this subject shall once have been 
 expounded and illustrated with due thoroughness — as I 
 earnestly hope it will be within the next few years — then 
 
58 THE SPENCER BANQUET. 
 
 I am sure it will be generally acknowledged tliat our 
 great teacher's services to religion have been no less sig- 
 nal than his services to science, unparalleled as these have 
 been in all the history of the world. 
 
 MR. BEECHER'S REMARKS. 
 
 The old New England churches used to have two 
 ministers ; one was considered as a doctor of theology, 
 and the other a revivalist and pastor. The doctor has 
 had his day, and you now have the revivalist. (Laugh- 
 ter.) Paul complained that Alexander the coppersmith 
 did him much harm. Mr. Spencer has done immense 
 harm. I don't believe that there is an active, thoughtful 
 minister in the United States that has not been put in a 
 peck of troubles, and a great deal more than that, by the 
 intrusion of his views, and the comparison of them with 
 the old views. I can not for the life of me reconcile his 
 notions with those of St. Augustine. I can't get along 
 with Calvin and Spencer both. (Laughter.) Sometimes 
 one of them is uppermost, and sometimes the other 
 (laughter), and I have often been disposed to let them 
 light it out themselves, and not take any hand in the 
 scrape. (Laughter.) It is to be borne in mind that when 
 a man is driving a team of fractious horses that are just 
 all that he can manage anyhow, he is not in a state of 
 mind to discuss questions with his wife by his side, who 
 is undertaking to bring up delicate domestic matters. 
 (Laughter.) A man that has a bald-headed deacon 
 watching everything that he does, or a gold-spectacled 
 lawyer — not a fat one (looking at Mr. Bristow), but a 
 long, lean, lank one (looking at Mr. Evarts, amid great 
 
MR. BEECEER'S REMARKS. 59 
 
 laughter) — can't afford to talk Spencerism from the pul- 
 pit ; he has got to take care of himself first (laughter), and 
 he must therefore not be expected to come in like an equi- 
 noctial storm : he will rather come in like a drizzle (laugh- 
 ter) ; he will descend as the dew. (Laughter.) But one 
 thing is very certain — Mr. Spencer is coming ; whether 
 men want to have him or not, he is coming. Well, he has 
 come ; he has come to stay. Mr. Spencer may have dys- 
 pepsia, but his books have got no dyspepsia. (Applause.) 
 They like the climate (laughter), and they are working 
 their way very steadily, without any regard to those 
 dietetic or nervous or nervine considerations which he has 
 been kind enough to propose to us here to-night. Those 
 books can work day and night everyv/here, all over the 
 continent, and never grow any thinner. By-the-by, 
 when he speaks about our being so industrious, he speaks 
 like an insular gentleman. You have very little to do in 
 England. You have but about three hundred miles diame- 
 ter one way and eight hundred the other. (Laughter). We 
 have got this whole continent to take care of. (Laughter.) 
 We have to get up early and work late in order to take 
 care of it. (Laughter.) We are an ambitious people, and 
 we have learned from astronomers that they are five hours 
 ahead of us every day in England, and we have to work 
 with all our might to make up those five hours. (Laugh- 
 ter.) We don't intend to be surpassed by the old people 
 on the other side. We are the young people on this side. 
 We intend to do as well as they have done, and a little 
 better. 
 
 Now let me say, with a little more approach to sobri- 
 ety (laughter), what I think about the doctrines of Mr. 
 Spencer's philosophy. Not all his admirers or debtors 
 or disciples need adopt his conclusions fully. We may 
 deem his base-line to be correct, and yet not be sur- 
 prised if here and there parts of his vast field should 
 
go THE SPENCER BANQUET. 
 
 need to be resiirveyed. But, speaking in general terms, 
 I think that the doctrine of evolution and its rela- 
 tions to the work of Mr. Spencer — which takes in that, 
 but a great deal more besides — to speak in plain lan- 
 guage, is going to revolutionize theology from one end 
 to the other (applause), and it is going to make good 
 walking where we have had very muddy walking hith- 
 erto ; it is going to bridge over rivers which we have had 
 to wade. There are many points in which the theology 
 of the past did well enough for the past, bnt does not 
 any more answer the reasonable questions and the moral 
 considerations that are brought to bear upon it in our day. 
 (Applause.) We are to bear in mind in regard to Script- 
 ure, which is the great source of instruction on the part 
 of the organized religions of the Christian world, that we 
 have there what we all agree in. Some points have al- 
 ready been made in regard to it. Paul speaks of his idea 
 of what the whole drift of Christianity was. It was a 
 system to make men. That is what it was. lie said. To 
 some He gave apostles and prophecies, and evangelists 
 and teachers, for the perfecting of tlie saints, that they 
 may become perfect men in Christ, or upon the model of 
 Christ Jesus. The New Testament idea is that religion 
 is the art of putting men on to an anvil and hammering 
 them out into perfect manhood ; now, there is no diiier- 
 ence between that tendency in Mr. Spencer's work or Mr. 
 Darwin's, or any other of that galaxy of eminent writers 
 that shine in the east — there is no difference between 
 them and us on that subject. Then, on the other hand, 
 taking that for the ideal, that the whole business of relig- 
 ion is not merely to insure a man against fire in the other 
 world, but to create an insurable interest in him (laughter), 
 the business before men is the making of themselves while 
 they are making also the world in which they dwell, 
 building up society, bringing that day when the very 
 
MR. BEECHER'S REMARKS. (31 
 
 wilderness shall bud and blossom as the rose ; making 
 manhood — ethics, in short, of the building kind. And in 
 that regard the morality which is taught in Mr. Spencer's 
 work is entirely in agreement with the great morality 
 that is taught in the sacred Scriptures. Men forget that 
 the Scripture itself — and it ought to have dawned on 
 the minds of the men who are so afraid it will be de- 
 stroyed — is itself a proof of evolution. There is no 
 fact more absolutely patent than that every moral idea 
 from the opening of Genesis, right straight through 
 the period in Judges and down to the New Testament 
 day — every one of the great moral ideas rose like a star, 
 and did not shine like a sun until ages had given it ascen- 
 sion. (Applause.) The very conception of the divine 
 nature begins at daylight and goes on to sunrise and to 
 meridian brightness ; and all the doctrines of duties and 
 relations in the Old Testament — they are all of them pro- 
 gressive from the beginning down clear through to the 
 end. The doctrine of immortality was not known in the 
 Old Testament day. Here we have Professor Park, of 
 Andover, and a great many good and godly men in New 
 England, discussing to-day whether a man who don't 
 believe that everybody that dies impenitent will be 
 damned for ever and ever — whether he is fit to preach the 
 gospel ; and yet for more than five thousand years there 
 was not a man living on the face of the earth that knew 
 there even was a future. (Applause.) We have the ex- 
 plicit declaration in the New Testament that life and 
 immortality were brought to light by Christ. For more 
 than five thousand years men did not know anything fit 
 to preach, according to the modern notion. 
 
 But look at the great question of the origin of men. 
 It is a hypothesis that we are but the prolongation of 
 an inferior animal tribe, and there are many evidences 
 among men that it is so. (Laughter.) I can almost 
 
Q2 THE SPENCER BANQUET. 
 
 trace the very lines on which some men have come 
 down. (Laughter.) It is said that we descend from the 
 immortal monkey ; but that is not the truth that is 
 taught, as I understand it, in the books. You have got to 
 go a great way farther back than that before you find 
 your grandfather. (Laughter.) Apes came down from 
 the same starting-point, working toward bone and muscle, 
 and we came down on the other side, working toward 
 nerve and brain. A great many people are loath to think 
 that such an origin should be hinted at by science, that 
 it should stand even as a hypothesis. I would just as 
 lief have descended from a monkey as from anything 
 else if I had descended far enough. (Laughter.) But 
 let men have come from where they will, or how they 
 may have come, one thing is very certain, that the hu- 
 man race began at the bottom and not at the top, or 
 else there is no truth in history or religion ; and that 
 the unfolding of the human race has been going on, if 
 not from the absolute animal conditions, yet from the 
 lowest possible savage conditions ; and the Jewish legend 
 that men were at the top, and then fell from the top to 
 the bottom, and carried down all their posterity with 
 them, and that God's business has been for eight, ten, 
 twenty thousand years, and how many more I know not, 
 the punishing of men for sins they never committed — well, 
 that has got to go. (Applause.) It will not be twenty 
 years before a man will be ashamed to stand up in any 
 intelligent pulpit and mention it. (Applause.) On the 
 other hand, see what light is thrown upon Divine Provi- 
 dence. According to the old theology, one single person 
 was sorted out, an emigrant, and the whole of the divine 
 thought was centered on him and on his posterity, and 
 all the collateral races of every kind were left without 
 a temple, without a book, without a priest, without a 
 Sabbath, without a sacrifice, without an altar, without 
 
MR. BEECHER'S REMARKS. 63 
 
 anything, while he brought uj) one single family ; and 
 what a family ! (Laughter.) And what bringing up ! 
 (Laughter.) What a means of grace it was to have had 
 those twelve patriarchs ! Those men in modern society 
 could not have lived, with the exception, perhaps, of one or 
 two of them ; they could not have lived — outside of Sing 
 Sing (laughter) — unless they went into politics. (Laugh- 
 ter.) They went down to Egypt and there they were 
 abandoned to slavery for four hundred years. What was 
 done for them ? Nothing. They came out of Egypt, and, 
 passing forty years through the wilderness, came into the 
 eastern line of Palestine and took possession, by the 
 sword, of the land, slaughtering the inhabitants, and, for 
 four hundred years there was an interregnum again, until 
 we come down to the time of Samuel, and then after that 
 there is no continuity of organized government. The 
 hiatus between one period and another, the interregnum 
 periods, when you come to put them together, negative 
 the current and conventional conception of the nature of 
 the special tutelary administration of God over a chosen 
 people, relieving them from the operation of the laws of 
 social progress. On the other hand, when you come to 
 look at the actual facts and take the whole human family, 
 they have been steadily and gradually unfolding, some 
 with greater rapidity and some less. Some were more in- 
 capable of thought than others ; some were stronger in 
 hand and tarried by the way to fight ; but on the whole 
 the world has been, with unequal speed, advancing from 
 the earliest period down to the present time. It is a great 
 deal more consonant with any rational idea of an over- 
 ruling Providence and a divine justice than that which 
 belonged to the old theologies. 
 
 Then comes the question of sin. I am taught by 
 Augustine and Calvin, and all of the mediceval preachers, 
 that there are two sorts of sin— one is original sin— I 
 
51 THE SrENCER BANQUET. 
 
 have always been original enougli to have my own sin 
 (laughter) — but that we were all under conditions of guilt, 
 wrath, and penalty, on account of the transgression of 
 Adam and Eve, I don't know how many thousand years 
 ago ; that the guilt of their inexperience — their transac- 
 tion in the garden of Eden — ran clear down through 
 the thousands of years, and included every child that 
 was born from that time to this. Now, what is the the- 
 ory that comes on the other hand, on the side of sci- 
 ence ? It is the theory that man is first an animal pure 
 and simple, and that by the breathing of the breath of 
 G9d into him there is the unfolding gradually of a ra- 
 tional soul, an intellectual capacity, a moral and a spir- 
 itual nature, and that while he was an animal the exercise 
 of selfishness, of plunder, of combativeness and destruc- 
 tiveness, was the law of his being ; and then it was not 
 only a necessity, but the act was a virtue ; but by gradual 
 development he has come to the possession of those higher 
 qualities which should rule him. Sin lies in the contlict 
 between animal nature and the dawning of the spiritual, 
 moral, and intellectual nature. It is the conflict in a man 
 between his upper and lower nature. If you want to see 
 that taught thoroughly, goto seventh Romans and see how 
 Paul argues the matter. He says : " The things I would do, 
 I do not ; the things I would not do, I do. So, then, it is 
 not I," he says, " but sin that dwelleth in me. I find a 
 law in my members." He was almost fit to be a minister 
 to Darwin. *' I find a law in my members that compels 
 me to sin, but that I in which my personal identity is, 
 the I that thinks, the i"that perceives, that aspires, the 
 flash of imagination (which he calls faith), the whole frui- 
 tion of a great soul that approves the spiritual law, the 
 manly law : whatever is right, pure, just, beautiful — I see 
 that, but I am all the time doing the other. My under 
 man, my physical man, is fighting against the upper man." 
 
MR. BEECHER'S REMARKS. 65 
 
 There isn't a man here but knows that is so. Every even- 
 ing rebukes every morning among the whole of you. 
 You go out in the morning with inspiration and noble 
 feeling, and say, " This day I will cheat nobody," and 
 you come back at night and you have cheated a dozen 
 men. (Laughter.) And so on through the whole scale 
 of conduct. Great light is thrown, by this truly scien- 
 tific and truly scriptural view, on the subject of the 
 nature of sin. I might go on and show that in many 
 other ways religious teaching is greatly benefited by 
 the light that is coming on the world from the great 
 thinkers of the day. Now men say, Will you abandon 
 revelation ? No. We all believe, that believe in Moses, 
 that God wrote on stone. I believe that that was not the 
 first time he wrote on stone. He made a record when 
 he made the granite, and when he made all the suc- 
 cessive strata in the periods of time. There is a record 
 in geology that is as much a record of God as the record 
 on paper in human language. (Applause.) They are 
 both true — where they are true. (Laughter.) The record 
 of matter very often is misinterpreted, and the record of 
 the letter is often misinterpreted ; and you are to en- 
 lighten yourselves by knowing both of them and inter- 
 l^reting them one by the other ; and it is no more a quar- 
 rel between science and religion, between the Bible and 
 philosophy, than a discussion over family matters is a 
 quarrel between the husband and the wife ; it is simply a 
 thorough adjustment of affairs. (Laughter.) 
 
 Gentlemen, we have had a good time here to-night, too 
 much of it, especially for a man like me, that can't eat be- 
 cause he has got a speech to make. We shall very soon 
 break up. It is not our privilege to meet Mr. Spencer 
 face to face as we all would be glad to do ; I certainly 
 would. I don't know of a man living with whom, if I 
 might sit down in the shade of the evening, in quiet, and 
 
QQ THE SPEXCER BANQUET. 
 
 bring up my crude thought, my vagrant imagination, and 
 avail myself of superior experience and thought — I know 
 of no man now living with whom I should feel more hon- 
 ored and more pleased in communing than with him. It 
 is not in my nature to derive benefit from any mortal soul 
 and forget the obligation. I feel in my pulse a longing 
 that goes back to the early days, to Homer, and comes 
 down through the whole catalogue of noble writers who 
 have written that which the world has thought worth pre- 
 serving ; and every man that comes up in our day, and 
 whose writings fortify me and strengthen me — I would 
 fain carry some tribute of affection to him. I began to 
 read Mr. Spencer's works more than twenty years ago. 
 They have been meat and bread to me. They have 
 helped me through a great many difficulties. I desire 
 to own my obligation personally to him, and to say 
 that if I had the fortune of a millionaire, and I should 
 pour all my gold at his feet, it would be no sort of 
 compensation compared to that which I believe I owe 
 him ; for whoever gives me a thought that dispels the 
 darkness that hangs over the most precious secrets of 
 life, whoever gives me confidence in the destiny of my 
 fellow-men, whoever gives me a clearer stand-point 
 from which I can look to the great silent One, and 
 hear him even in half, and believe in him, not by 
 the tests of physical science, but by moral intuition — 
 whoever gives that power is more to me than even 
 my father and my mother ; they gave me an out- 
 ward and a physical life, but these others emanci- 
 pate that life from superstition, from fears, and from 
 thralls, and make me a citizen of the universe. (Ap- 
 plause.) 
 
 May He who holds the storm in His hand be gracious 
 to you, sir ; may your voyage across the sea be pros- 
 perous and speedy ; may you find on the other side 
 
WHAT MR. YOUMANS DID NOT SAY. 07 
 
 all those conditions of health and of comfort which shall 
 enable you to complete the great work, greater than any- 
 other man in this age has ever attempted ; may you live 
 to hear from this continent and from that other, an un- 
 broken testimony to the service which you have done to 
 humanity ; and thus, if you are not outwardly crowned, 
 you wear an invisible crown on your heart that will carry 
 comfort to death — and I will greet you beyond ! (Great 
 applause.) 
 
 UNSPOKEN' SPEECHES, 
 
 WHAT MR. YOUMANS DID NOT SAY. 
 
 The foregoing addresses had the good fortune to 
 get uttered ; but, if the unspoken speeches, which were 
 hot for expression on many tongues, could also have 
 got vent, they would have consumed the whole night. 
 Of the unvoiced communications that were found not 
 available at twelve o'clock, notes have been furnished 
 of the following. Had Mr. Evarts given the occa- 
 sion a length proportional to its other magnitudes, 
 and proceeded to offer the following toast, " Spencer's 
 Philosophy of Evolution: the most original achievement 
 in the history of thought,^^ and then called upon Mr. E. 
 L. Youmans, he might have got in response what fol- 
 lows : 
 
68 THE SPENCER BANQUET. 
 
 Mr. President and Gentlemen : We are here to- 
 night to do honor to Herbert Spencer by testifying to 
 him and to the world our appreciation of the greatness 
 and the importance of his work. There is one trait of 
 his intellectual labors which ought not at this time to be 
 overlooked, and which has impressed me increasingly as 
 I have become familiar with his writings — I refer to their 
 originality. I do not here mean the mere originality of 
 literary form, nor even that of the pure creative imagina- 
 tion, but I mean that far higher originality of construc- 
 tive genius which builds new systems of truth out of the 
 multitudinous elements of solid knowledge ; and in which 
 imagination and reason work together under the inexora- 
 ble restraints of logic and of fact. Conforming through- 
 out to the rigorous canons of scientific method, Mr. Spen- 
 cer has given the world an amount of original exposition 
 and of new and valuable truth that are probably without 
 a parallel in the history of human thought. 
 
 Professor Marsh has given us an admirable sketch of 
 the progress of the doctrine of organic evolution, and has 
 justly credited Mr. Spencer with the development of its 
 broader applications ; but I wish to illustrate the origin- 
 ality of his approach to the subject, and to show how 
 completely the working out of the comprehensive theory 
 belongs to himself alone. 
 
 In his address as President of the American Associa- 
 tion for the Advancement of Science, at the Saratoga 
 meeting three years ago. Professor Marsh observed that 
 scientific men now no longer concern themselves about 
 the truth of evolution — they assume it, and go on. A 
 year or two previously Professor Geikie had said that 
 when he was in Germany the biologists remarked to him: 
 " You in England are still wrangling over the evidences 
 of evolution ; we are far ahead of you — we assume it, and 
 go on." Yet it was an Englishman who first took this 
 
WHAT MR. YOUMAXS DID NOT SAY. 69 
 
 advanced position. It is now exactly thirty years since 
 Herbert Spencer published an article in the " Westminster 
 Review" on " The Development Hypothesis," in which 
 he declared that the scientific evidence was even then 
 overwhelming in favor of the theory of the natural and 
 gradual evolution of organic life upon this globe. He 
 said, in substance, " There is no other hypothesis worth a 
 moment's thought, and, as for me, I assume it, and go 
 on." 
 
 To know how much this meant at that time, we must 
 remember that it was still the epoch of Buffon, Saint- 
 Hilaire, Lamarck, and Goethe, when it had begun to be 
 vaguely recognized that the significant facts all point one 
 way ; but how crude and wild were speculations upon 
 the subject, is shown by the fact that the " Vestiges of 
 Creation " was the last previous work upon development 
 that had attracted general attention, while that work 
 simply showed the direction in which men were groping. 
 Mr. Spencer entered the field through the gate- way of his 
 social studies. The idea of progress in society had been 
 simmering in his mind since his first publication of a 
 pamphlet, based upon this conception, which he wrote at 
 the age of twenty-two ; and its fundamental idea was 
 subsequently elaborated in the " Social Statics," published 
 in 1850. Two years later, he proclaimed his unqualified 
 acceptance of the hypothesis of development in the article 
 referred to. 
 
 I first became acquainted with the labors of Herbert 
 Spencer twenty-six years ago. I read an able article, in 
 a foreign periodical, entitled "Modern English Psychol- 
 ogy," which was a review of a work by Mr. Spencer, 
 declared by the writer. Dr. J. D. Morell, author of the 
 " History of Philosophy," to constitute a new departure 
 in the science of mind. I imported the book, and under- 
 took to read it, but could not understand it, and, after 
 
70 THE SPEXCER BANQUET. 
 
 several attempts, threw it aside as hopeless. My sister, 
 however, was attracted to the unpromising volume, and 
 had the patience, or the curiosity, to keep at it. After a 
 time, she began to say : " There is a good deal more in 
 that book than you suspect. I have got far enough with 
 it to know that it is great stuff, at any rate. It is a very 
 original book ; and, if you get at the author's point of 
 view, you will find it a new revelation." The work was 
 Spencer's " Principles of Psychology," published in 1855. 
 And what was the difficulty about it ? Simply this : it 
 was a new exposition of the lavrs of mind, based upon 
 the principle of evolution. Spencer had assumed the 
 truth of the doctrine, and gone on ; and this was the first 
 scientific and systematic application of it. He took the 
 fundamental position that man with all his faculties has 
 been evolved by the slow and continuous operation of 
 natural causes. The new point of view consisted in re- 
 garding evolution as the key to the constitution of mind. 
 Heredity and the gradual modification of organisms, 
 through their intercourse with environing nature, were 
 the cardinal conceptions of the work. The position 
 taken was that it is by experiences registered in the slow- 
 ly perfecting nervous system that the mental faculties 
 have been gradually evolved through long courses of ge- 
 netic descent from the lowest to the highest creatures, 
 each generation inheriting all that had been previously 
 gained, and adding its own increment to the sum of prog- 
 ress. It was maintained that ideas and feelings, thus slowly 
 engendered, are transmitted as aj)titudes and capacities ; 
 while the intuitions of thought have arisen in the heredi- 
 tary intellect, and the moral sentiments in the hereditary 
 conscience of the race. The intuitional and the experi- 
 ence hypotheses, over which philosophers had quarreled 
 for ages, were here first reconciled. It was shown that 
 all knowledge and the very faculties of knowing origi- 
 
WHAT MR. YOUMANS DID NOT SAY. ^^l 
 
 nate in experience, but that the primary elements of 
 thought are a j^riori intuitions to the individual, being 
 derived from ancestral experience. 
 
 The absolute originality of this great work has never 
 been questioned, and yet it was the first legitimate and 
 permanent scientific result of the application of the law 
 of evolution. It marks the close of the period of specu- 
 lation in regard to this subject, and the opening of the 
 new period when it was to become the guide of scien- 
 tific inquiry. I maintain that its fundamental doctrine, 
 as propounded at that time, was nothing less than a turn- 
 ing-point in the thought of the scientific Avorld. A new 
 and profounder interpretation had been reached of the 
 nature of man and the method of the universe. Twie 
 was now first recognized as the supreme factor in the 
 production of effects for which it had been formerly sup- 
 posed that time was unnecessary. The action of slow- 
 working natural agencies in the affairs of this world was 
 here first reduced to scientific application. The geolo- 
 gists, to be sure, had established the fact of the vast an- 
 tiquity of the earth ; but they still clung to the notion of 
 miraculous breaks in the course of nature, and they did 
 not afiirm the principle of inexorable continuity in the 
 causes and effects of natural phenomena. 
 
 I have said that I had difiiculty in mastering this 
 work, but in this I v/as not alone. I lent the book to the 
 late Dr. Ripley, who could make nothing of it, though 
 long trained in German metaphysics, and he was so dis- 
 gusted with his failure that he declared he should like to 
 throw it at the author's head ! John Stuart Mill also had 
 his difiiculties with it. He pronounced it " the finest ex- 
 ample we possess of the psychological method in its full 
 power," but, strange to say, he resisted its fundamental 
 evolutionary conception. He prized the treatise for the 
 new light it threw on the processes of mental develop- 
 
72 THE SPENCER BANQUET. 
 
 ment in the individual, but he contested the genesis of 
 intuitions through inheritance. He Avas strongly com- 
 mitted, as was his father before him, to the view that the 
 faculties of the mind originate wholly in individual ex- 
 perience. He did not perceive the import of the time- 
 element ; all the time he wanted was a life-time. Mill 
 maintained that character can be formed in a few years 
 through the omnipotence of education, just as orthodoxy 
 taught that it can be transformed in a few hours through 
 the omnipotence of grace. The error was all-pervading, 
 and belonged to the epoch of thought. Governments and 
 institutions, it was supposed, could be invented on new 
 patterns, and set agoing on the shortest notice. Saint- 
 Simon, Fourier, and Comte, as is well known, believed 
 that human societies can be manufactured on new princi- 
 ples in a very short time, with enormous benefits to man- 
 kind ; and it was, in fact, generally considered that all 
 social evils can be reformed out of the world in about five 
 years, if only everybody would seriously get about it. 
 
 Spencer's "Psychology" was a destructive assault 
 upon this whole order of ideas made twenty-seven years 
 ago through the first great scientific application of the 
 doctrine of evolution. Its fundamental idea was that, as 
 men have been but slowly produced, they can be but 
 slowly adapted to new conditions ; and that Kature, with 
 her deliberate methods, has a vastly larger share in the 
 work of human improvement than was formerly recog- 
 nized. Not long before his death, Mr. Mill acknowledged 
 that the rereading of Spencer's work gave him a new con- 
 ception of its import, which he recognized was partially 
 due to progress in his own mind ; and in a letter to Dr. 
 Carpenter he at last conceded the princiiDle which Mr. 
 Spencer many years before, and in advance of all men, 
 had made the new basis of the science of mind. We 
 thus see how fully Herbert Spencer had taken possession 
 
WHAT MR, YOUMANS DID NOT SAY. ^3 
 
 and command of a field of thought, even now regarded 
 as new, a generation ago. 
 
 It was while writing the "Psychology," in 1854, that 
 Mr. Spencer first arrived at the conception of evolution as 
 a universal law. The subject now opened up before him 
 in all its breadth, and the problems multiplied right and 
 left. As all things are constantly undergoing orderly 
 changes, what are the common laws of transformation ? 
 What the laws of this eternal redistribution of matter 
 and motion, with their tendency through countless ages to 
 a higher unfolding ? What, in short, are the causes and 
 factors, the limits and formula, of the evolutionary proc- 
 ess in all the diversities of its operation ? These were 
 Herbert Spencer's questions from 1850 to 1860. They 
 were problems of science now everywhere recognized as 
 legitimate, immanent, and Inevitable. In 1858 he had ar- 
 rived at the idea that this universal process of law which 
 accounts for the origin, continuance, and disappearance of 
 the changing objects around us, is the deepest principle 
 we can reach of the method of nature, and must necessitate 
 a new organization of knowledge and a new dispensation 
 of philosophy. We have here the secret of the original- 
 ity that characterizes Spencer's work. Tlie first great 
 »tep he had taken compelled it. Whole branches of 
 knowledge had to be reinvestigated and remolded in the 
 light of an all-comprehensive and reconstructive principle. 
 In brief, Mr. Spencer saw that the great advance of mod- 
 ern knowledge made it imperative to originate a new or- 
 ganon of philosophy, groimded upon science and embody- 
 ing throughout the theory of evolution. 
 
 I can not here withhold my humble tribute of admira- 
 tion to the courage, the pluck, the heroism of this thinker 
 in engaging upon his great task. Everything was against 
 him. Single-handed, with no church or party behind him, 
 backed by no university or scientific society, v/ith but 
 
 4 
 
Y4 THE SPENCER BANQUET. 
 
 little means, in broken health, without even a publisher, 
 and in the face of public prejudice and a hostile press, he 
 nevertheless resolved to carry out a comprehensive sys- 
 tem of thought that would require twenty years of his 
 life. The moral intrepidity of the undertaking was as 
 original as its intellectual character. 
 
 Let us now carefully note the progress that Spencer 
 had made with the subject of evolution in 1858. Besides 
 the "Psychology," printed three years earlier, he had 
 written some twenty-five elaborate articles for the lead- 
 ing reviews, expounding and applying the doctrine of 
 evolution upon a large number of subjects. All these 
 articles were, however, anonymous, in accordance with 
 review usages at that time, so that he did not get the 
 credit of them. But his views upon the whole subject 
 were now well ripened, so that he was prepared to give 
 them to the world in a systematic form. He accordingly 
 drew up a prospectus (1858) of a philosophical system, to 
 occupy seven volumes, and embracing the fundamental 
 pi'inciples of evolution, and the applications of the doctrine 
 to the subjects of life, mind, society, and morality. In 
 1859 he revised this programme, extending it to ten vol- 
 umes, and giving their detailed contents in logical order, 
 under thirty-three consecutive heads. This document 
 shows that the doctrine of evolution was carefully and 
 maturely elaborated in its proofs, its scientific form, and 
 the comprehensive scope of its applications, twenty-three 
 years ago, substantially as it stands to-day exemplified in 
 his extensive works. 
 
 I must here add that the profound import of his philo- 
 sophical system, and how thoroughly he was prepared for 
 it, were well known among eminent thinkers at that time. 
 Being without resources to maintain himself and publish 
 his projected scheme, Mr. Spencer thought of applying to 
 the government for some position which he could con- 
 
WHAT MK. YOUMANS DID NOT SAY. 75 
 
 scientioiisly fill, and the duties of wliich might still allow 
 leisure to prosecute his work. He proposed the plan to 
 some friends, who offered to second his application. The 
 result was, that letters were written by Huxley, Grote, 
 Hooker, Mill, Tyndall, and Fraser, concurrently declaring 
 that, of all men of the present age, Spencer was pre-emi- 
 nently the one to undertake such a comprehensive co- 
 ordination of the sciences as he contemplated ; and that 
 it would be an honor to any government to promote the 
 enterprise. These letters were designed for publication, 
 but Mr. Spencer never printed them. They all bear the 
 date of 1858. 
 
 The originality of Spencer's achievement is thus vindi- 
 cated in its incontestable priority to all other promulga- 
 tions of recent evolutionary doctrine. He is the follower 
 in this of no man ; he is in advance of every other. It 
 may surprise some of you when I state that all I have 
 here described of Spencer's work was accomplished be- 
 fore Mr. Charles Darwin had ever published a word upon 
 the subject. That great naturalist contributed the im- 
 portant principle of natural selection to organic evolution 
 (as did also Mr. Wallace), in 1859, thus showing how new 
 species may originate ; but natural selection is not evolu- 
 tion — is but a subordinate part of it — and there has 23rob- 
 ably been more conflict over the question of its real value 
 as a factor in the process than over any other point in 
 relation to it. With the general subject, indeed, as a 
 problem of scientific investigation, Mr. Darwin never 
 even attempted to deal. It has been currently said since 
 his death that he went into the great pantheon of Brit- 
 ish immortals as the father and founder of modern evo- 
 lution, but those who make such claims do no service to 
 his reputation. We have seen what are the facts, and 
 even interment in Westminster Abbey can not change 
 them. Mr. Darwin will remain the illustrious Keformer 
 
76 THE SPENCER BANQUET. 
 
 of biology and the most distinguished naturalist of the 
 age, but with Mr. Spencer will abide the honor of com- 
 plete originality in developing this greatest conception 
 of modern times, if not, indeed, of all time. 
 
 WHAT MR. WARD WAS READY TO SAY. 
 
 Had the master of the occasion then required Mr. 
 Lester F. Ward, of Washington, to speak to the follow- 
 ing sentiment, " The True Philosopher — the highest Prod- 
 uct of Evolution ^^ Mr. Ward would have remarked : 
 
 Me. Chaikman and Gentlemen : There is a peculiar 
 fitness in this testimonial to the great philosopher, now 
 the guest of this country, and so soon to leave our shores. 
 The occasion is certainly very distinct from nearly all 
 others having the same external characteristics. The 
 place you have selected is indeed famous for such enter- 
 tainments, but too often they are given in honor of mere 
 politicians. Such testimonials always involve the prin- 
 ciple of a quid pro quo. The individual to be honored 
 merely represents power to confer favors upon those who 
 honor him. Admiration is moved by self-interest. Very 
 different is the present occasion. The recipient of this 
 honor holds his high position by virtue of what he has 
 done. No political revolution or social cataclysm can 
 ever shake it. His fame rests upon ideas, and as com- 
 pared with ideas all other foundations are but sand. 
 
 Again, all must feel that it is not merely to a tnoM 
 that homage is being done ; it is rather to a great mind 
 — a mind that has proved itself capable of grappling suc- 
 cessfully with the profoundest problems of the universe. 
 It is this brain - power, conceived to a large extent as 
 
WHAT MR. WARD WAS READY TO SAY. 77 
 
 impersonal, that we would recognize and honor. Mr. 
 Spencer's personality is, as it were, swallowed np in his 
 intellectuality. He represents no royal line of ancestors, 
 bears no titles of honor from great states or great institu- 
 tions, but occupies his present exalted place in the eyes of 
 the world purely and solely through the force of his intel- 
 lect. Unaided by human effort, and from the depths of 
 his own mind, he has formulated the laws of the universe, 
 not merely in the simpler and better known departments 
 of astronomy and physics, but throughout the new and 
 unexplored realms of life, mind, and action. It is to this 
 achievement that we would do homage, which we do by 
 honoring the man — the physical organization through 
 which it was accomplished. Thus, at times, we find it 
 difficult to think of him as formed of bone and sinew, 
 flesh and blood, and contemplate him as the embodiment 
 of psychic power. 
 
 For myself, I confess to the great force of this sen- 
 timent, occasioned perhaps by a long - continued habit 
 of communing with his thoughts, always regarded as 
 thoughts, and wholly disconnected from the character of 
 their source ; and this spell was scarcely broken by the 
 warm grasp of his hand with which, but the other day, 
 I was honored. 
 
 Mr. Spencer's pre-eminence as a philosopher rests pri- 
 marily upon two qualities, and can only come of the union 
 of these in one and the same mind. These qualities are, 
 first, his extensive information ; and, second, his extraor- 
 dinary causality. The work of the true philosopher is 
 pre-eminently the synthesis of extant knowledge. To 
 accomplish this work he must possess, on the one hand, 
 the greater part of the general knowledge of his age, and, 
 on the other, the special faculty required to co-ordinate 
 it. Rarely, indeed, are these qualifications combined in 
 a single mind. It has been the misfortune of philosophy 
 
Y8 THE SPENCER BANQUET. 
 
 that the most of the truly logical minds have been de- 
 plorably lacking in the necessary data upon which to ex- 
 ercise their reasoning powers, while many of the minds 
 that have taken pains to acquire extensive information 
 have proved wholly incapable of making any rational use 
 of it. We have, therefore, had logicians and speculators 
 on the one hand, and erudites and specialists on the other. 
 
 When Mr. Spencer entered the literary world, the 
 great demand of the age was a synthetic philosophy. He 
 perceived this, and had the rare gift of seeing his own pe- 
 culiar fitness for such an undertaking. This duty seemed 
 to devolve uj^on him ; he accepted it, and no one has been 
 found to challenge his qualifications to perform it. His 
 mastery of all branches of human knowledge has been 
 justly styled " encyclopedic." His causality has never been 
 equaled. To him were thus secured the two essential con- 
 ditions for accomplishing the permanent object of philos- 
 ophy — 'the synthesis of science. Without the comprehen- 
 sive survey which his laborious investigations have se- 
 cured for him, his great combining powers would have 
 been profitless ; without those powers no museum of 
 facts, however well learned, would have yielded the broad 
 principles of a cosmical philosophy. Of the former of 
 these statements, not only all the great minds of an- 
 tiquity, but such modern names as those of Kant and of 
 Hamilton, are obvious examples ; while of the latter the 
 life of Humboldt is, perhaps, the most conspicuous proof ; 
 although, within more restricted limits, the scientific 
 world offers a multitude of instances in which the ca- 
 pacity for observation vastly transcends the power of 
 co-ordination. 
 
 In his grasp of other truths Mr. Spencer has not 
 failed to comprehend this one. It is he himself who has 
 said (and both the language and the thought belong to 
 the anthology of our tongue) that " only when Genius is 
 
WHAT MR. WARD WAS READY TO SAY. 79 
 
 married to Science can the highest results be produced." 
 And, if we rescue the word genius from that bastard syn- 
 onymy with monomania to v»^hich modern usage threat- 
 ens to condemn it, we find that in him these two fertile 
 attributes are united with all the constancy and sanctity 
 of wedlock. 
 
 If I might be permitted to hint at the precise direc- 
 tion from which Mr. Spencer's great labors most strongly 
 appeal to my mind, I should do so by intimating the 
 possibility that he himself may fail to appreciate their 
 full scope and influence. Emerson, one of whose wise 
 sayings Mr. Spencer has embodied in his own remarks, 
 has said of the world's greatest artist that — 
 
 " He builded better than he knew." 
 
 May it not be that the world's greatest philosopher has 
 also " builded better than he knew " ? May it not be that 
 in telling us what society is, and how it became such, he 
 has unconsciously pointed out the way in which it may 
 be made better ? In laying down the principles according 
 to which social phenomena take place in nature, may he 
 not have rendered possible, in the near future, some prac- 
 tical applications of those principles to higher social 
 needs ? I venture to predict that, in thus building the 
 science of Sociology^ Mr. Spencer has prepared the way 
 for the introduction, on the basis of that science, of the 
 corresponding art of Sociocracy. 
 
80 THE SPENCER BANQUET. 
 
 WHAT MR. LELAND GOT KO CHANCE TO 
 
 SAY. 
 
 Had Mr. Evarts still persevered, and given the toast, 
 '''Evolution : no empty abstraction, hut a guiding ^:)r^?^c^- 
 2)le in 2^'i^cictical life^'' Mr. E. R. Leland, of New York, 
 would have cheerfully responded, however late, as fol- 
 lows : 
 
 Mr. Chairman a:n^d Gentlemen : It would not be 
 easy, even if it were possible, for me to add to the com- 
 pleteness of the able and eloquent discussions which have 
 gone before as to the position of the doctrine of evolu- 
 tion ; its bearing upon the problems of society and na- 
 tion-making ; its relations to religion and education ; but 
 I am glad of an opportunity to pay my humble tribute to 
 Mr. Sj)encer, to whom, in common with many, I owe a 
 very great debt. In attempting this task I labor under 
 the disadvantage that making remarks in public has nev- 
 er been any part of my business. I am not accustomed 
 even to think in the terms used by philosophers, mor- 
 alists, and scientific men ; for, like many others here, I 
 am for the most part engaged in obeying the admonition 
 of Bacon, who says, in effect. While philosophers are dis- 
 cussing as to whether the pursuit of pleasure or virtue is 
 the greatest good, let it be your business to secure that 
 which makes either possible. It is not bad advice, pro- 
 vided it be not followed too long and eagerly, but this 
 egoistic pursuit is apt sadly to interfere with the acquisi- 
 tion of that learning which Mr. Spencer has just told us 
 is for the uses of life. 
 
 For years, however, I have been an admirer and dis- 
 ciple of Mr. Spencer, and his books have been my com- 
 panions. They are not usually regarded as easy reading, 
 but rather are popularly supposed to answer pretty nearly 
 
WHAT MR. LELAND GOT NO CHANCE TO SAY. 81 
 
 to Thoreau's definition of good books — " books that no 
 intelligence can understand ; that an idle man can not 
 read, and a timid man dare not." But here, as elsewhere, 
 it needs but a little application to prove the truth of 
 D'Alembert's maxim, " Go on, and the light will come to 
 you." 
 
 There is a feeling, not uncommon, that the doctrine 
 of evolution is concerned chiefly with matters that have 
 but a distant connection with the affairs of every-day 
 life. It is generally supposed that it relates principally 
 to the development of systems and of worlds, to the ori- 
 gin of species, to the unity of creeds, and the various im- 
 portant but formidable subjects upon which it is consid- 
 ered safer and more comfortable for laymen to have 
 teachers and experts to do their thinking for them. But 
 Mr. Spencer, in his kindly criticism and sound advice to- 
 night, and in the expression of his views which has recent- 
 ly appeared in the papers, shows plainly enough that, so 
 far from dwelling in an atmosphere too rare for ordinary 
 mortals, the bent of his genius is thoroughly practical ; 
 and it requires no profound study of his system to learn 
 that, however vast may be its scope, it is founded upon 
 laws that have been discovered and studied by the aid of 
 tangible and common facts, with which all are familiar ; 
 so familiar that their true significance has remained un- 
 seen until pointed out by the great thinker whom we 
 honor to-night. Not only is evolution based upon and 
 illustrated by simple and familiar facts, but its applica- 
 tions are made to the sort of problems that are daily pre- 
 sented to us. It would be too much to say that it pro- 
 vides a formula that in unskilled hands will solve them 
 all ; but it does help to classify and explain phenomena 
 that are constantly coming to the notice of workers in 
 every department of life, and the lessons that it teaches 
 are those which even business-men must need to learn. 
 
82 THE SPENCER BANQUET. 
 
 The contemiDt for theorizing which men who pride 
 themselves upon being practical often express, is well 
 known. It arises usually from a misconception, from 
 confounding vagaries with theories, for it is a somewhat 
 stale truism that the success of these men — and they are 
 usually successful — is due to the care which they give to 
 working out or adapting sound theories. What I wish 
 here to call attention to is, that this contempt is not con- 
 sistently held even by the men who avow it. Nothing is 
 more common than for them to give nominal adherence 
 to doctrines (theories) that are wholly inconsistent with 
 the methods by which they regulate their business ; they 
 regularly listen and assent to teachings which if practical- 
 ly followed would bring immediate and utter confusion 
 to their affairs ; they subscribe to doctrines, as to the dis- 
 tribution of wealth, for example, that Professor Sumner 
 would find a rather unstable foundation upon which to 
 base a theory of economy ; they aver their belief in mir- 
 acles, but, in the provision of a feast like the one before 
 us, they feel it safer to trust Mr. Delmonico than a caterer 
 who would in any degree depend upon supernatural agen- 
 cies to furnish the loaves and fishes, or the wine and ci- 
 gars. 
 
 But this diametrical opposition between creeds and 
 conduct is, and long has been, one of those awkward con- 
 flicts which each man has to reconcile for himself, and 
 perhaps the less said about it the better. But it is proper 
 to point out that the philosophy of evolution involves no 
 inconsistencies of this kind. It deduces a code of mo- 
 rality, than which none is more exalted nor more exacting, 
 from the same laws that regulate the conduct of an hon- 
 est and sagacious man in the daily walks of life when he 
 seeks to lay the foundations of a fortune and maintain 
 and establish his family. The fundamental laws upon 
 which the doctrine of evolution rests have a bearing on 
 
WHAT MR. LELAND GOT NO CHANCE TO SAY. 83 
 
 the questions that daily confront business-men that is by 
 no means remote. They are of practical and every-day 
 importance. The law of the persistence of force, at the 
 foundation of the evolution theory — that every manifes- 
 tation of power must be preceded and followed by equiv- 
 alent manifestations — has other applications than in pure 
 physics. If understood, and remembered at the right 
 time, it would protect men from worthless investments in 
 Keely motors and kindred humbugs. If the laws of mat- 
 ter, which prove that by no sort of manipulation can 
 something be had for nothing, were more familiar, men 
 would not be led away by the vagaries of fiat money nor 
 be deluded by the sophistries of protection. Not only 
 would there come from such knowledge aid in avoiding 
 errors and worthily winning wealth and honor, but it 
 V/^ould bring to men a much-needed assistance in the exe- 
 cution of the desire, so often felt and so often proving 
 abortive, to confer upon their fellows some portion of the 
 benefits received ; so that in their endowments and be- 
 quests there might appear a partial recognition of the agen- 
 cies and the labors that have made such success possible. 
 
 It is obviously better that the laws that govern our 
 endeavors should be followed intelligently than that they 
 should be obeyed or disobeyed unknowingly, for they are 
 inexorable, and no plea of ignorance avails. Man's ac- 
 tivities are regulated by natural laws as exactly and as 
 absolutely as are the movements of the spheres, and that 
 which we are fond of calling human progress is but one 
 phase of evolution in its comprehensive sweep. 
 
 To the man who has done more than any other to un- 
 fold to us these truths, the whole thinking world does hom- 
 age. The tributes which have on this occasion been paid 
 to his worth and his work have been so earnest and so 
 touching, that it remains only to say to them a most 
 hearty amen ! 
 
84 THE SPENCER BANQUET. 
 
 LETTERS, 
 
 Boston, November 6, 1882. 
 
 Dear Sir : I regret that my engagements will not 
 permit me to enjoy the meeting in honor of Mr. Spencer, 
 which I hope may take place, as proposed, on the evening 
 of the 9th of November. 
 
 It would have been a great pleasure to me to testify 
 by my presence that I share the feelings of respect and 
 admiration of which this occasion is one passing mani- 
 festation. Mr. Spencer has come nearer to the realization 
 of Bacon's claim of all knowledge as his province than 
 any philosopher of his time. It is a life's work to exhaust 
 a single specialty as it must be studied to-day. " Go to 
 the ant," with Sir John Lubbock ; " consider her ways," 
 and learn what it is to study a square inch or two of 
 Nature's surface. The man who takes the survey of the 
 entire order of things as his specialty, must needs have a 
 long stride and a clear outlook. He must have a well- 
 measured and largely extended base-line of ascertained 
 fact to begin with, and command the views which extend 
 themselves from all the heights of the various sciences. 
 
 The facts of development furnished Mr. Spencer with 
 his base-line. From the summit of one branch of knowl- 
 edge after another, he has brought its phenomena into 
 relation with this base-line and with each other, until we 
 look with amazement upon the reach and compass of his 
 vast triangulation of the universe. 
 
 Nature taught him her great law in the life of an ^gg 
 which completes its history — a mass of organizable 
 matter v/hich has escaped being turned into an omelet ; 
 a spot ; a line ; a groove ; a group of walled spaces with 
 their soft contents ; self -distribution into regions ; self- 
 differentiation into tissues and organs ; self -movement as 
 a Yv^hole ; self-consciousness as an individual ; emergence 
 at length from the inviolate secrecy of the divine studio 
 Avhere it has been shaped, a creature of God, full-armed 
 to fight for its life against the elements. Just in this 
 
LETTER FROM ANDREW D. WHITE. 85 
 
 same way, and no other, are built up the Newton s, the 
 Youngs, the Darwins, the Spencers, who interpret the 
 hieroglyphics of nature and of history for common mor- 
 tals. All is development, and the standing illustration of 
 it was laid before the world by the bride of Chanticleer, 
 when she proclaimed to the virgin creation that she was 
 a mother. 
 
 An apple gave the hint of gravitation. An egg taught 
 the lesson of evolution. The old Roman banquets pro- 
 ceeded ab ovo usque ad malum ; the courses of science 
 have gone just the other way — a nialo usque ad ovum — 
 from the apple of Isaac Kewton to the egg of Herbert 
 Spencer, 
 
 May he live to place the cap-stone on that pyramid of 
 achievements which is already one of the wonders of the 
 modern intellectual world ! 
 
 Yery truly, yours, 
 
 O. W. Holmes. 
 Dr. W. J. YouMANS, 
 
 Secretary of Committee. 
 
 Ithaca, N. Y., November 8, 1882. 
 
 Deae Sir : I regret exceedingly that my duties at 
 this university absolutely forbid my accepting your very 
 kind and attractive invitation. Apart from the pleasure 
 of joining in a festival such as you propose, and of meet- 
 ing your distinguished guest, I would rejoice to add my 
 testimony to that of others regarding the services ren- 
 dered to this country by Mr. Herbert Spencer. 
 
 No competent person can look over the history of 
 education in the United States during the past twenty 
 years and not see that Mr. Spencer's ideas have been 
 among the principal forces in bringing about the great 
 and happy changes which have taken place. The move- 
 ment in favor of physical training as a basis for intel- 
 lectual training, the development of mental training in 
 accordance with the methods and sequences of nature, 
 the tendency more and more toward a moral training 
 based upon ascertained natural law, the prominence given 
 
86 THE SPENCER BANQUET. 
 
 to studies in science and to a more scientific method in 
 pursuing every study — in short, the bringing of all hu- 
 man development into harmony with the methods stamped 
 upon the constitution of the universe — for all this prog- 
 ress, our debt to him is great indeed. 
 
 And I am persuaded that we are but at the begin- 
 ning of reforms which his thought has done so much to 
 set in motion. More and more his ideas are becoming 
 known, and more and more they are embodied in the 
 practice of our best schools from highest to lowest. 
 This tendency is no mere fashion ; it is not at all 
 spasmodic ; it does not even seem to the casual ob- 
 server rapid ; but no thoughtful student can deny that 
 this progress has a steadiness and persistency which 
 give the best assurances of its long and beneficent con- 
 tinuance. 
 
 And I would add thanks for what he has done in 
 planting a good germ into the thought of the entire na- 
 tion within these last weeks. His recent utterances as to 
 certain great wants among iis, if pondered well, may also 
 bring us a blessing. 
 
 With renewed thanks and regrets, I remain, dear sir, 
 very respectfully and truly yours, 
 
 Andeew D. White. 
 Dr. W. J. YouMANS, 
 
 Secretary of Committee. 
 
 Columbia College, New York, 
 President's Room, November lOy 1882. 
 My dear Pkofessor : I can not refrain from ex- 
 pressing to you my regret and sorrow that I could not be 
 present at the demonstration in honor of your illustrious 
 guest of last evening, Mr. Herbert Spencer. It is impos- 
 sible that any one should feel more profoundly than I 
 do the magnitude of the debt which the world owes to 
 that great man. In revealing and demonstrating the laws 
 which govern all progress, physical, moral, or social, he 
 has himself contributed the most powerful impulse to the 
 progress of the human race toward the good and the true 
 
LETTER Fr.OM R. UEBER NEWTON. 87 
 
 that tliis or any other century has known. His philosophy 
 is the only philosophy that satisfies an earnestly inquiring 
 mind. All other philosophies (at least in my experience) 
 serve more to perplex than to enlighten. As it seems to 
 me, we have in Herbert Spencer not only the profoundest 
 thinker of our time, but the most capacious and most 
 powerful intellect of all time. Aristotle and his master 
 were not more beyond the pygmies who preceded them 
 than he is beyond Aristotle. Kant, Hegel, Fichte, and 
 Schelling are gropers in the dark by the side of him. 
 In all the history of science there is but one name which 
 can be compared to his, and that is Newton's ; but New- 
 ton never attempted so wide a field, and how he would 
 have succeeded in it, had he done so, must be only mat- 
 ter of conjecture. 
 
 The peculiarity of Herbert Spencer's system seems to 
 me to be that it appeals directly to our intuitions, and is 
 therefore at once clearly intelligible and self-evidently 
 true ; which is a character I can not give to any of the 
 purely speculative philosophies with which the world 
 abounds. 
 
 To have testified, therefore, by my presence or my 
 voice, last evening, to my sense of the inappreciable value 
 of the services rendered by this great man to the race of 
 humanity, would have afforded me a satisfaction I iind 
 it difficult here to express. As you are aware of the 
 causes which prevented, you will, I am sure, sympathize 
 with me in my loss and my regret. 
 
 Sincerely yours, 
 
 F. A. P. Barnard. 
 Dr. W. J. YouMANS, 
 
 Secretary of Committee. 
 
 Garden City, November 5, 1883. 
 Dear Sir : I inclose my check for $12 for one ticket 
 to the dinner to be given to Mr. Herbert Spencer. Please 
 send my ticket to my sexton, Mr. S. M. Crandell, 716 
 Seventh Avenue, icith the hour noted on it. If I get back 
 from Boston in time, I shall be at the dinner. 
 
88 THE SPENCER BANQUET. 
 
 I am particularly glad that your committee has in- 
 cluded some of the genus parson in your invitations, for 
 certain well-known peculiarities in its make-up have been 
 displayed in a rather ungracious manner toward your dis- 
 tinguished guest. I am sure that all the best representa- 
 tives of the clerical vocation, however they may differ 
 from Mr. Spencer, entertain the profoundest respect for 
 his abilities and character, and the sincerest gratitude for 
 the single-minded service he has rendered the cause of 
 truth. I am sure that all liberal-minded clergymen wel- 
 come truth — whoever brings it into the world, and in 
 Avhatsoever shape it comes — and expect in the future no 
 other basis for real religion than the truths science and 
 philosophy yield ; though they surely look to see those 
 truths blossom in the imagination into worship, and turn 
 in action into the forces of social virtue. 
 
 Yours, etc., 
 
 R. Heber Kewton. 
 Dr. W, J. YouMANS, 
 
 Secretccry of Committee. 
 
 Cincinnati, November' 6, 188^. 
 
 My dear Sir : If it had been at all possible, I should 
 have accepted with the greatest pleasure your invitation 
 to attend the banquet in honor of Mr. Herbert Spencer 
 on the eve of his return to Europe. Ever since the pub- 
 lication of his first volume of essays I have admired him 
 as one of the brightest and most vigorous intellects of 
 our time, and I now regard him as a philosophical writer 
 who has done more than any other living Englishman, at 
 least, to stimulate the thought and expand the horizon of 
 his contemporaries. Although I am constrained to dis- 
 sent from some of his propositions, and can not venture 
 to express an opinion as to a large part of his writings 
 covering a field to which I am a stranger, yet it appears 
 to me that the value of his contributions to those sciences 
 which deal with the life and growth of society can hardly 
 be overestimated. I regret sincerely that I am unable to 
 
LETTER FROM GEORGE M. DAVIE. gg 
 
 avail myself of the opportunity you offer me to press the 
 hand of one of the foremost thinkers of the age. 
 Very truly, yours, etc., 
 
 J. B. Stallo. 
 Dr. W. J. YouMANS, 
 
 Secretary of Committee, 
 
 Louisville, Kentucky, November 5>, 18S2. 
 
 Dear Sir : Upon my return after a ten days' absence 
 from home I found, through the kindness of your com- 
 mittee, an invitation to attend the banquet to Mr. Herbert 
 Spencer to-night. Had it been possible, I should certain- 
 ly have done so, notwithstanding the distance and other 
 engagements. 
 
 I admire and, indeed, reverence so much Mr. Spencer's 
 intellectual and moral greatness, that I should have 
 through life esteemed it a most pleasant memory to meet 
 him and joined in doing him honor. I had arranged, in 
 conjunction with some other friends of his, to make his 
 reception in Kentucky such as would have shown the ap- 
 preciation in which he is held ; and it was quite a dis- 
 appointment that he was compelled to abandon his West- 
 ern excursion. 
 
 I trust that I may yet have the privilege of meeting 
 him, here or in England. 
 
 Respectfully yours, 
 
 George M. Davie. 
 
 Dr. W. J. YouMANS, 
 
 Secretary of Committee. 
 
 New York City, 208 Fifth Avenue, November 6^ 1882. 
 
 My dear Sir : I am in receipt of your cordial invita- 
 tion addressed to me, as a student of psychology, to join 
 in a complimentary dinner to Mr. Herbert Spencer, and 
 accept the same with the greatest pleasure. 
 
 Socrates, in the " Phsedo," is made to quote to Simmias 
 
90 THE SPENCER BANQUET. 
 
 and Cebes the old saying in the mysteries, '* Many are the 
 thyrsus-bearers, but few are the mystics," meaning, as he 
 interprets the words, "the true philosophers." These 
 words are true for all times, not less for the present than 
 for the days of the great opponent of the Sophists. They 
 are peculiarly true for that department of philosophy 
 which we are accustomed to call psychology, a science 
 which stands second to none in the importance of its re- 
 lations to the progress of universal knowledge. 
 
 We have had opportunities to honor men eminent in 
 various branches of physics, to celebrate the achievements 
 of those who have made priceless contributions to politics, 
 economics, and the other sociological sciences, but I do 
 not remember that we in this city ever have had occasion 
 to testify in any public manner our appreciation of a 
 master in psychology. True, in Mr. Spencer we have 
 pretty much all the virtues combined (except reverence 
 for our time-honored methods of practical politics) ; but, 
 while we honor him as a universal philosopher, let us not 
 forget that we are doing homage to the greatest psy- 
 chologist of modern times — indeed, I believe I am justi- 
 fied in saying, the greatest in the world's history. 
 
 This is no place to vindicate Mr. Spencer's claims, but 
 I think his peculiar merit lies in the fact that he has ap- 
 plied the law of evolution with its consequent methods to 
 mental phenomena, and read the history of the develop- 
 ment of those phenomena in the light of that law. The 
 effect of this application has been twofold : in the first 
 place, in showing that the laws of mental development in 
 the individual, through association and representation, are 
 but laws of evolutional differentiation and redintegration, 
 and thus to be subsumed under the more general law of 
 evolution which applies alike to the inorganic, the or- 
 ganic, and the superorganic worlds ; in the second place, 
 in showing how the progress of each individual mind is 
 but an intermediate link in the general development of 
 mind from the very lowest limits of organic nature, thus 
 adding and making necessary to a true and complete 
 mental science the whole realm of objective and compara- 
 tive psychology, and connecting thereby the sciences of 
 mind with those of material nature. It can scarcely be 
 estimated how much this must contribute to the unifica- 
 
LETTER FROM FRED. W. HINRICHS. 91 
 
 tion of knowledge. And this magnificent service Mr. 
 Spencer has rendered. His work marks a new epoch in 
 psychological science. 
 
 I am, my dear sir, very respectfully yours, 
 
 Daniel Gkeenleaf Thompson. 
 Dr. W. J. YouMANs, 
 
 Secretary of Committee. 
 
 New York, November 9, 1882. 
 
 My dear Sir : The invitation of your committee to 
 the complimentary dinner to Mr. Herbert Spencer reached 
 me in due course. I have waited until now to reply, 
 hoping that circumstances would so shape themselves that 
 I could send my acceptance. 
 
 My admiration for the distinguished Englishman 
 whom you meet to honor is so great and unqualified that 
 I write my regrets with more than disappointment. As 
 a member of a church, I can still read Mr. Sj)eneer's com- 
 ments on the " creeds outworn " with the greatest spirit- 
 ual profit. None but the most unobservant will deny 
 that Herbert Spencer has done more than any other living 
 man to modify the prevailing popular religious notions — 
 I believe, very much for the better of the Church and hu- 
 manity in general. 
 
 My desire to meet Mr. Spencer is not only strong by 
 reason of my earnest admiration for the man, but is, I 
 may say, painfully curious, on account of the perplexing 
 condition of mind into which he has plunged me as to 
 various philosophical and political subjects. 
 
 Brought up, as I was, by an old Scotch professor, in 
 the school which holds that we have a separate, distinct, 
 and lively factor, called " intuition," in our intellectual 
 and moral make-up, which discloses to us absolute truths, 
 quite independent of experience, I still cling, in philoso- 
 phy as in religion, to the early lessons of ray youth. But 
 my judgment can not but recognize the tremendous force 
 of the arguments advanced by the school of " experience." 
 We are all, perhaps, unconsciously drifting toward a 
 
92 THE SPENCER BANQUET. 
 
 general and complete accei^tance of Herbert Spencer's 
 philosophy, with its feiv postulates and its rigid logic. 
 
 Our national policy has almost uninterruptedly fa- 
 vored a protection, so called, of home industries. Some- 
 times I fear that the tendency toward the realization of 
 a paternal form of government in other directions is very 
 decided. Our economic system, clubbed by some the 
 " American system," demands that the Government foster, 
 yea, even bring into being, "infant industries," which^ 
 we know can exist only at the expense of all, for the 
 benefit of the few. In educational circles a like spirit of 
 protecting the citizen against himself, or his own im- 
 providence, prevails, and seems to be growing from year 
 to year. The only reason, or excuse, for jniblic education 
 is entirely lost sight of. As a member of the Brooklyn 
 Board of Education, I hear frequent mention of the im- 
 mediate pressing necessity for hie/her education at the 
 public cost. The elementary education for all classes, 
 which is generally regarded as indispensable for the safety 
 of the republic, and as a proper police regulation, is 
 neglected for that something called a higher education. 
 The advocates of the latter forget that only the favored 
 few can afford to spend sufficient time to avail themselves 
 of the high-school or free college ; that such favored few 
 can generally well afford to jm^/ for their schooling ; that 
 in not paying for said schooling they are being supported 
 by the community at large, including the poorest, who, 
 though not directly contributing to the tax-fund, are yet 
 indirectly, by the enhanced cost of living, suffering from 
 the burden of improper taxation. The advocates of this 
 higher education, above all things, forget that, to assist a 
 man to stand %t^ho is very loell able to stand alone, is to 
 weaken him. The self-reliance and energy which we 
 possess as a people or a race, as Mr. Spencer has taught 
 us in more ways than one, are due to the fact that we 
 have generally been left alone "to work out our own 
 salvation." 
 
 " The Proper Sphere of Government " and Mr. Spen- 
 cer's works on education have so affected my mind that 
 it baffles me at times to see intelligent men insisting upon 
 increasing the functions of government, and upon rob- 
 bing the people of their most lasting and valuable educa- 
 
LETTER FROM W. D. LE SUEUR. 93 
 
 tion acquired only in the school of self-culture and self- 
 reliance. 
 
 I do now most heartily believe that Herbert Spencer's 
 presence with us will make his influence felt more than 
 ever, and that his words will be " as leaven to leaven the 
 whole lump " of our political and social life. 
 
 Very sincerely, etc., 
 
 Feed. W. Hineichs. 
 Dr. W. J. YouMANS, 
 
 Secretary of Gommiitee, 
 
 Ottawa, November S, 1882. 
 
 Dear Sie : I thank you very much for the invitation 
 you have kindly sent me to take part in a comiDlimentary 
 dinner to be given to Mr. Herbert Spencer on the 9th 
 instant. Circumstances, I regret to say, will render it 
 impossible for me to be present on the occasion in ques- 
 tion ; but I beg to assure you of my hearty sympathy 
 with the object the committee have in view, of paying 
 honor to one who stands forth incontestably as the fore- 
 most philosopher of the age. 
 
 It is now many years since Mr. Spencer's writings first 
 fascinated me by their logical vigor, their breadth of de- 
 sign, and their sustained elevation of moral tone and pur- 
 pose. To my youthful enthusiasm he appeared the one 
 man in the whole world who was fully equipped to fight 
 the intellectual battles of the time — a kind of Mr. Great- 
 heart, under whose powerful protection humble pilgrims 
 might journey in safety to a land of light and truth. 
 And though, as I have hinted, some years have passed 
 since then, and I have learned to do justice to other he- 
 roes of thought, I am not sure that my youthful enthusi- 
 asm was so far astray. 
 
 What has chiefly interested me in Mr. Spencer's phi- 
 losophy has always been its claim to lay the foundations 
 for a rational system of human morality. I do not say 
 the foundations of morality ; for these it does not rest 
 with any man to lay. The scheme of things under which 
 
94: THE SPENCER BANQUET. 
 
 we live eitlier provides, or does not provide, for morality 
 as the developed form of human conduct. If it does not, 
 and if such morality as has heretofore existed in the 
 world has been but a by-product, as it were, of transient 
 theological systems, not the natural result of social action 
 and reaction, then indeed is the lot of humanity a most 
 unhappy one. If, on the other hand, there is that in the 
 constitution of things which not only " makes for right- 
 eousness," but leads up to a love of righteousness for its 
 own sake, then the highest service which any thinker can 
 render to a doubting age is to bring the fact clearly to 
 view ; in the words of Lucretius — 
 
 " E tenebris . . . tarn clarum extollere lumen — " 
 
 so lighting up forces, as the poet goes on most happily to 
 remark, the true advantages of life. This is a case in 
 which much depends upon whether we are conscious of 
 the rule of nature's working. It is one thing for the 
 forces of nature to act upon beings unconscious of their 
 drift or principle, and quite another for them to act upon 
 a race of intelligent co-operators. To produce such a 
 race is the aim, and I fully believe is the tendency, of all 
 Mr. Spencer's writings. The world is half-conscious of 
 this already — it will be more fully conscious of it by- 
 and-by ; and the fame of Mr. Spencer will rest secure 
 on the basis not only of his splendid intellectual gifts and 
 achievements, but of his broad sympathy with humanity, 
 and his lofty conception of the destinies of our race. 
 Believe me, dear sir, with great personal regard, 
 Yours very faithfully, 
 
 W. D. Le Sueur. 
 Dr. W. J. YouMANS, 
 
 Secretary of Committee. 
 
LETTER FROM WILMOT L. WARREN. 95 
 
 Springfield Repcrlican, Springfield, Mass., 
 
 Novemher 7, 1882. 
 
 My dear Sir : It will give me great pleasure to share 
 in the opportunity to do honor to Mr. Herbert Spencer, 
 as proposed in your kind invitation of the 27th ultimo. 
 
 No man has more powerfully and healthfully stimu- 
 lated the thoughtful minds of this generation, and espe- 
 cially of its younger portion. In sociology, especially as 
 regards the tendencies of modern political life, and in the 
 great field of education, so important in this country 
 where education is undertaken by the state, we ow^e to 
 him a great debt. The next generation, reaping the fruit 
 of the seed which he has sown, will probably realize this 
 more keenly then the present. 
 
 Hoping you will pardon the unavoidable delay and 
 haste of this acknowledgment, 
 
 I remain, your obedient servant, 
 
 WiLMOT L. Warken. 
 
 Dr. W, J. YOLMANS, 
 
 Secrdary of Committee. 
 
 Holly Hills, Maryland, Novemher 6, 1882. 
 
 My dear Sir : Be so good as to accept for yourself, 
 and present to the other members of the committee, my 
 sincere thanks for the invitation to the dinner to be given 
 to Mr. Herbert Spencer at Delmonico's on the 9th instant. 
 Nothing, I am sure, but the fact that Mr. Spencer came 
 to the United States for rest and health, with his expressed 
 desire that his visit might be one of quiet observation, has 
 prevented such public demonstrations of the esteem in 
 which he is held personally and as a writer, on this side 
 of the Atlantic, as have very rarely been bestowed upon 
 distinguished visitors. Mr. Spencer is eminently a teacher 
 in whom there is no guile, and thousands of those who 
 differ radically with him in his religious views, and w^ho 
 can not quite folloy/ him in some of his philosophic teach- 
 ings, greatly honor him for his independence and upright- 
 
96 THE SPENCER BANQUET. 
 
 ness, for the clearness and vigor of his style, the ability 
 with which he presents his own doctrines, and the fair- 
 ness of his treatment of opponents. 
 
 I have great admiration of him, and sincerely regret 
 that my engagements at home prevent me from being 
 present. 
 
 Very truly yours, 
 
 Hugh McCulloch. 
 
 Dr. W. J. YODMANS, 
 
 Secretary of Committee. 
 
'';)ert Spencer's Miseellaneous Works. 
 
 VtION : Intellectual, Moral, and Physical. 
 
 Y Cloth, $1.25; cheap edition, paper, 5i) cents. 
 
 Vrations of universai. progress. 
 
 I Cloth, $2.00. 
 
 ^i.TS : Moral, Political, and Esthetic. 
 
 ' 12mo. Cloth, $2.00. 
 
 THE STUDY OF SOCIOLOGY. 
 
 12mo. Cloth, $1.50. 
 
 SOCIAL STATICS; 
 
 Or, the Conditions essential to Human Happiness Specified, and the First of 
 Them Developed. With a Notice of the Author, l.mo. Cloth, $2.0:1. 
 
 RECENT DISCUSSIONS IN SCIENCE, PHILOSOPHY, 
 AND MORALS. 
 
 12mo. Cloth, $2.00. 
 
 PHILOSOPHY OF STYLE. 
 
 12mo. Flexible cloth, 50 cents. 
 
 Herbert Spencer's Synthetic Philosophy. 
 
 " 7b conceive a system so positive and universal in itself an education to an 
 age.'' — A. M. J'airbairn, D. D. 
 
 1. FIRST PRINCIPLES. 
 
 1 vol. 12mo. Cloth, $2.00. 
 
 2. THE PRINCIPLES OF BIOLOGY. 
 
 2 vols. 12mo. Cloth, $4.00. 
 
 3. THE PRINCIPLES OF PSYCHOLOGY. 
 
 2 vols. 12mo. Cloth, $4.00. 
 
 4. THE PRINCIPLES OF SOCIOLOGY. 
 
 2 vols. 12mo. Cloth, $4.00, 
 
 5. THE DATA OF ETHICS ; 
 
 Being Part I, Vol. I, of The Principles of Morality. 12rao. Cloth, $1.25. 
 
 For sale by all booksellers; or sent by mail, post-paid , on receipt of price. 
 
 D. APPLETON & CO., Publishers, 1, 3, & 5 Bond Street, New York. 
 
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 
 
 
 •oility 
 
 D E S C R I - 011 416 ' 037 4 3 L C fair- 
 
 A CYCLOPEDIA OF SOCIAL FA((bTg 
 
 Rtpresenthig the Constitution of Every Type and Grade of Hu,. 
 Society, Past and Present, Stationary and 
 Progressive : 
 
 Classified and Tabulated for Easy ('omparison and Convenient Stujy 
 OF THE Relations of Social Phenomena. 
 
 Eight Numbers, Royal Folio. 
 
 Undee the three groups of Uncivilized Societies, Civilized Soci- 
 eties Extinct or Decayed, and Civihzed Societies still Flourishing, 
 the social constitution of seventy -two distinct communities is de- 
 scribed in this series of works. 
 
 Sociology of the English Race. No. I.— Price, $4.oo. 
 
 Sociology of the Mexicans, Central Americans, Chib- 
 chas, and Peruvians. No. II.— Price, $4.oo. 
 
 Sociology of the Lowest Races, Negritto Races, and 
 Malayo-Polynesian Races. No. in.— Price, $4.oo. 
 
 Sociology of the African Races. No. IV.— Price, $4.oo. 
 
 Sociology of the Asiatic Races. No. v.— Price, $4.00. 
 
 Sociology of the American Races. No. VI.— Price, $4.oo. 
 
 Sociology of the Hebrews and Phoenicians. No. VII. 
 
 —Price, $4.00. 
 
 Sociology of the French Race. No. Vlil.— Price, $7.oo. 
 
 (Double Number.) 
 
 D. APPLETON & CO., Publishers, 1, 3, & 5 Bond Street, New York. 
 
 _»*^y,*-'' 
 
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 
 
 011416 037 4