i'H5(i^ o '^.. '' (NN' lI. ^"^^ '' rt'^ .o"o 0' c ■ :^^^ ^ ^^ ^^ <-. O I* o ^lil "^^ ■ ^"•'*. <^ t. 7o* . . , V -€^C- •-^ » feS" "S- ,xi ^o ^■f^'' f. /-- > .1 *o^ -S ^ .*^ ■<. ri. •* CL^°^ 0 ■ u. ;^ .^' • » 1 ^^ .-N *^ v o « t , C" >■ ' * 'O' f\^ " o - ^^ * . , , • aO "V '^ o - o " V OffN ^"'^<^. >>*, \^ ^ .^ cJ Deacon Tkodosiiis Clait Hon. William J. Clark v^ BIOGRAPHY AND GENEALOGY iS ^J^^// '• ■*' ',0 C^ Ciyj-'i-i^ Jf'-^<^oL4,-(s-i'iy u 'C / DEACON THEODOSIUS CLARK HON. WILLIAM J. CLARK t BIOGRAPHY AND GENEALOGY a reprint from The "Commemorative Biographical Record OF New Haven County" 1902 / HON. WILLIAM JUDSON CLARK HON. WILLIAM JUDSON CLARK was born in the town of Southington, Hartford Co., Conn., Aug. 19, 1825, of a parentage descended from three separate Hnes of Clarks, who were among the "Founders'' of the Connecticut and New Haven Colonies, 1635-1639, as will appear later on in this sketch. He was the third child of Theodosius and Chloe Clark, and was reared on his father's farm. Mr. Clark's primary education was received at the district school of his native town — the tradi- tional "'little red school house," with long, heavy, slab benches for seats ; and a row of six or eight pu- pils occupying each bench. As soon as old enough, he was employed on his father's farm, in the sum- mer, studying only in the winter and spring terms, but he kept up with his classes, few of those who enjoyed the full year's course surpassing him in recitations. At the age of fifteen he began attend- ance at the Southington Academy, three miles from his home, walking daily six miles ; and by studying evenings, easily kept up with the students who had the advantage of the full year's tuition. In this way he was nearly prepared for college when, in the spring of 1845, a severe attack of ophthalmia cut short his educational career, changing, no doubt, the whole tenor of his life. The autumn of 1846, however, found him suffi- ciently recovered to take charge of the high school at West Avon, Conn. His success as an instructor did not prevent him, however, from seizing an op- portunity which presented itself in the spring of 1847, ^or engaging in commercial pursuits, by en- tering into a partnership with his brother-in-law, Hezekiah C. Cummings. The new firm — Cum- mings & Clark — leased a country store at Hitch- cock's Basin, located on the Farmington Canal, in the southern part of the town of Southington, where the Waterbury & Meriden turnpike crosses the canal. At that time all the heavy freight for this and the other Southington stores was brought by boats from New Haven, and a large part of the Waterbury freight was also brought to the "Ba- sin ;" the firm running a boat, for general trans- portation, between New Haven and the home port. They also discharged much Waterbury freight, at Beach Port (now West Cheshire). The enterprise of the firm led them to branch out from the ordinary country store goods and add a coal and lumber yard, the first in the town. The following year, 1848, the railroad succeeded the canal, and the name of the place was changed to Hitchcock's Station, but the business was continued successfully until the end of the three years' lease, _i and then, as it could not be renewed, the copartner- ship was dissolved. The California gold fever broke out in the win- ter of 1848-49, and young Mr. Clark thought it a favorable opportunity to see the world and prove the truth — or the untruth — of the marvelous stories that floated eastward from the far-away country on the Pacific coast. He was one of the company of fifty-six members who bought the schooner "G. H. Montague," of 200 tons capacity, and stocked it, at New Haven, m January, 1849, ^'^'ith provisions for the long voyage around Cape Horn, and the ma- terials deemed best by an old and experienced North Carolina miner, W. S. Porter, to carry to an almost unknown land. On the 23d of that month the vessel's lines were cast off, and the white sails spread for the twenty-thousand-mile trip, and amid much enthusiasm the "forty-niners" started off, like their forefathers of 1638, to found a new common- wealth. Five months from that time the vovasre — successful, except that a sailor was washed away in a gale off Cape Horn — was ended ; and on June 26th the little schooner, witli all sails bellying to the breeze, entered the gateway to the beautiful bay, proudly ploughing her way up to the anchorage in front of the new El Dorado — the canvas-built city of San Francisco. No ship leaving the eastern States that year had beaten her into ]~)ort, though she had battled with adverse gales aiul rough seas for twenty-one days off Cape Horn. She had led the procession to her destination without loss of a spar, or a damaged sail, and the old mariners at 'Frisco looked upon the history of the successful voyage as a fairy tale until their own eyes verified it from the log-book of the brave little ship. A three days' tarry at San Francisco sufficed, and the "Montague"' was headed up the river to Sacramento, another city of white cotton, nailed to scantling framework. This place being nearer the seat of the gold discoveries, the rush of people they had witnessed at San Francisco was intensi- fied, and almost immediately the excitement of the older gold-seekers was communicated to the newly arrived. After spending the 4th of July at this place they ran the vessel twenty miles farther up the Sacramento, moored it to the bank, and, as soon as teams could be bought, made up and equipped a party for mining on the Yuba river. Mr. Clark was a member of the party that sallied forth upon the pathless prairie in search of the golden nuggets, fol- lowing the general course of the Feather river until they approached the Yuba, a branch or feeder of the former, and in three days found themselves at the diggings. Sufficient space on the river bottom, above "Corduay's Bar," was pre-empted for the company, a camp established, and gold-digging suc- cessfully begun. An ounce of gold to the man per day was not unusual, and sometimes two or three ounces would be the yield from a lucky pay streak. The confinement and diet on shipboard and the radical change occasioned by roughing it in the mountains, however, brought on illness that baffled the ship's doctor, and thirteen of the party were buried in three months, while many more became chronic invalids. It was thought best to give the invalids a chance to return to the States if they wished to do so. As Mr. Clark had been ill for three months, and .was so emaciated that he weig'hed only ninety pounds, he decided, in October, to start for the coast. He was conveyed the fifty miles to the schooner on a mattress laid on the wagon bot- tom, as he was too weak to sit up; the two days' trip was successful beyond expectation, and he reached the vessel in a slightly improved condition. After remaining there two weeks he had gained sufficient strength to attempt the trip down the river, and the twenty miles to Sacramento, as pas- senger on a row boat, were safely accomplished. Re- maining there a few days to recuperate, he took the steamer "Senator" (an old Hudson river side-wheel steamer that had been brought around through the Straits of Magellan) for San Francisco, the fare for the 150 miles being twenty-five dollars. Mr. Clark had contemplated returning home, but at San Francisco he met a physician who gave him hopes of recovery, and as business opportunities were at hand for those qualified to take them he decided to spend the winter there and test results. He found that good coffee was hard to obtain in the ground condition, all that had been thus brought from the States being tasteless. There was but one primitive hand-mill working in California and that turned out low-grade goods by using damaged coffee-berries. Finding another hand-mill for sale in the city, and three young men anxious to do the work, but with no means to start the business, Mr. Clark made a contract with them for the winter, bought the coffee-mill outfit, with tents adequate, hired a vacant lot on Pacific street and launched into business. His factory had a capacity of three hundred pounds per day, finished by hand power, and as he bought only the best quality of raw cof- fee and turned out a delicious product, he easily got two or three cents more on a pound than the only competitor there, and his trade soon grew to the capacity of his mill. No steam engine suitable could be found, so he worked the three hand power by changes of one hour each, until spring. The coffee venture was successful; but the contract made with the doctor, at seven'ty-five dollars per month, sick or well, was not quite so good in re- sults, for, while Mr. Clark's health had improved, it had not reached its normal condition ; and in March it was apparent to both parties that it would be a dangerous experiment for him to spend another summer in California. Conse- quently a purchaser for the plant w^as found, and, with regret at leaving a profitable business and his newly-made friends, INIr. Clark took steamer for Panama and New York, reaching home in April, 1850, having been fifteen months absent. During the homeward voyage, with the many stops and unusual experiences, there were numerous opportunities for a wide-awake young man to see, as in a panoramic view, a great deal of men and things in tropical and semi-tropical countries. The homeward voyage proved so beneficial to Mr. Clark's health that within a month after his re- turn he felt all the energy of his manhood restored, and realizing the broadening of his business per- spective, due to his observations of people and countries during his fifteen months' journeyings, he began to look about for some business in which he could utilize this new capital. As a starter he un- dertook a contract with a local manufacturer of car- riage-bolts, to make a trip "out West" (which then meant as far as Buffalo, the western limit of wholesale trade), to sell their goods. Lest Mr. Clark should make improper credits, owing to his inexperience, he was required to guarantee his sales, for which a special commission was agreed upon. Early in June he started ofif on the new enterprise, with samples of goods and high hopes of success. Three weeks were spent in "drumming trade," two weeks more in visiting western relatives. The orders obtained were sent in to be filled, and when the young "drummer" returned, the settlement showed that the guarantee had brought him over two hundred and fifty dollars to the profit side. The firm, seeing their mistake, were willing then to accept the risk and save the $250, but Mr. Clark had no idea of gCing back on a bargain, and in due time the business was settled without the loss of one dollar by bad credits. In the early fall another trip of three weeks was made over the same route with a fair, but not so large a result, owing to the short interval between the trips. This seemed to be the 10 • opening for him, and as he had guaranteed the sales, and the customers were his own by agree- ment, he decided to "set up business for himself." On the Quinnipiac river, near Mr. Clark's home, was a dilapidated building with a small water-power known as Morse's Mill. In the early days of the century it had been a satinet mill, weaving into cloth the yarn which was the product of the farm- ers' sheep and the housewives' spinning-wheels. This work was given up in 1834-35, and one of the primitive "bolt-shops" soon thereafter started in its place. This had a short life there, and then for a short time a horse-nail machine was operated in the old mill. This was followed by a clock manu- facturer, who filled the old shop with business for two or three years, when he, too, failed, and the premises were rented to a party making cold pressed nuts for the bolt-makers, who had become estab- lished with improved machinery in other parts of the town. It required much courage for a young man just starting business to take a mill with so unlucky a history, but Mr. Clark's brave spirit was equal to facing the "hoodoo," and in November, 1850, he bought the premises, subject to the lease that expired that year, so that he made prepara- tions to occupy, with a small amount of machinery, early in '51, tearing away the old building and erecting a new one more suitable for his require- ments. He got a favorable start in the first year, making the cold pressed nuts for other bolt-makers, selling bolts for them to his own trade in exchange, and was able to add two more power presses to the 11 one with which he began the work. The ill for- tune which had followed the old mill for so many years now swooped down upon him, and the fac- tory was burned down in May, insured for only about half its value. The indomitable courage of the man came again to the fore, and as soon as the ruins were cool enough to work in, the debris was cleared away, and the machines were shipped to the manufac- turer, with orders to repair those available, and replace the others with new ones, and have them ready in one month. The insurance adjusters gave no trouble, saying that it was a clean loss for a much larger amount than they carried, and promising a prompt settlement. Mr. Clark then went to New Haven, bought the timber for a new building and hired a force of carpenters there to frame all the timbers in the lumber yard, and while that was being done the foundations of the factory were rebuilt. When the timber and lumber were shipped to Hitchcock's station, a force of carpenters followed the next day, and the carting, raising and covering of the new building were hustled in a manner never before witnessed in that vicinity. At the end of thirty days from the fire, Mr. Clark was ready to re- ceive the new and repaired machinery, and in sixty days was producing newly made goods from the rebuilt factory. Though ^h. Clark had nearly or quite lost his original slender capital by the fire, his credit, though perhaps slender also, had not faded under the ordeal, and at the opening of the 12 new factory his principal creditor, the ironmaster, told him to "take all the time he wanted" as to invoices soon to be due from importations, on or- ders out at the time of the fire, that could not be cancelled. The business prospered, naturally, under such a persistent manager, who coupled courage with sound judgment. Increased facilities and more operatives were required as time went on, and the business in- creased, and in 1854 i\Ir. Clark associated with him- self his two younger brothers, Henry H. and Charles H. Clark, the style of the new firm being William J. Clark & Co. The early business of making nuts and washers by heavy machinery, and pressing them from cold iron w^as supple- mented with machinery for making carriage, tire and stove bolts, machine bolts, coach screws, and later other articles of hardware. A steam engine, as auxiliary power, was installed, and more buildings constructed, as more productive ma- chinery was required. Some of this had to be in- vented, in order to improve- or to increase the out- put of the works, and in ithis connection Mr. Clark made and patented several inventions in the line of bolt machinery, which revolutionized the methods previously employed. About this time the Civil war broke out, and a large demand arose for implements beyond the ca- pacities of the armories, so Mr. Clark added to his works, machinery for making gun screws of the government patterns, and of its gauge and stand- ard quality. With his ready adaptability and by the 13 aid of skilled help he soon mastered this most deli- cate mechanical task, and his gun screws, passed in- spection at the Springfield armory, with a loss of not over one per cent., while other competitors lost from five to ten per cent. This is referred to chiefly, to show that his aim as a manufacturer was to make his goods the best of their kind, and it was to this principle that he owed largely, for the success of the business. In 1 87 1 the senior member of the firm retired from the active part of the work, though he retained business relations with his brothers until 1880, when his patents, under which a majority of the carriage bolt-makers of the country were manufacturing on a royalty, expired. Upon his retirement, Will- iam H. Cummings, a nephew, and Robert W. Bemis, a long-time confidential bookkeeper, were received into the firm, which took the name of Clark Brothers & Co. About this time, as the quondam agricultural hamlet had much increased in population, owing to the growth of this estab- lishment, and the home building, near it increased also, and as the nearest post offices were one or more miles distan't, in either direction, Mr. Clark prepared a petition asking the Post Master Gen- eral to establish a post office at Hitchcock's Sta- tion, to be called Milldale. Some objection being sent to the Department (presumably by an office that desired to keep the mailing business of the firm), Mr. Clark went to Washington and so ex- plained the situation', that the petition was grant- ed, and the office of Milldale, which has sustained 14 itself handsomely from the beg-inning, estab- lished. Mr. Clark was not at that time, moreover, a novice in Washington. He w^as a stanch Repub- lican in politics, had been chairman of the South- ington town committee for ten or twelve years (be- ginning in the 'fifties, and continuing until he de- clined re-election) and was an active force as a Union man during the Civil war, aiding his State and the government in meeting the unfortunate conditions of the time. He was a trusted friend of the war governor, Buckingham, having been a mem- ber of the State convention that nominated him the first time. 1858, the wisdom of that act being proven by Buckingham being kept in the office for eight successive terms by annual re-elections by the peo- ple, his service covering the entire period of the war. Mr. Clark was instrumental in organizing the Union League in his town, was its first presi- dent, and was annually re-elected during the war. He also took the first steps in the movement which resulted in the "Furlough Act," 1863, whereby in- valided soldiers obtained a thirty-days furlough, to visit their homes. Mr. Clark's youngest brother and partner in the business enlisted in the 20th Connnecticut Regi- ment in 1862. He served until 1865, having risen to the rank of lieutenant, and then returned to his home and resumed his place in the business. This seemed an opportune time for the senior partner to take a vacation, so he planned a trip to Montana, where he had a friend in the government employ 15 who had urged him to come out and examine the gold diggings there and the gold quartz lodes re- cently discovered and reported to be rich. Mr. Clark's business friends in Hartford, hearing that he was planning this trip, and having also heard of the rich gold and silver quartz lodes of Montana, prevailed upon him to head a company which would furnish funds and machinery to be used in working there, he to decide upon location and superintend operations for one year. The fund was made up in one afternoon, the company formed and me- chanical skill supplied to assist in selecting the ma- chinery, which with the necessary supplies, making a fifty-ton cargo, was shipped to St. Louis to be sent from there by steamer to sail May i, 1865, to Fort Benton, on the Upper Missouri river. The "spring rise" in the river, caused by the melting snow in the Rocky mountains, was not as great as usual, and when well up in the Indian country the boat grounded several times, and finally, at Dophans Rapids, it was found impossible to pull over, so the steamer was backed a few miles in order to find a place favorable for landing pas- sengers and cargo. This was found, 150 miles below Fort Benton, and about four hundred miles from the place where the cargo was wanted. In the Indian country, and three hundred miles be- low Helena, Momt., Mr. Clark and the other pas- sengers had to leave the boat and make their w^ay to Helena as well as they could. lea\ing the freight to be brought up from the river by ox- teams. It was November before it arri\-cd. hut in 16 the meantime Mr. Clark had not been idle, hav- ing- manas^ed to construct a mill. Mines were opened and work pushed for a winter and summer. Then, in common with many others in that section, he found that beyond a few feet below the surface the mines were practically worthless, and so the project was suspended. As the second winter came on, and he found his labors unsuccessful, Mr. Clark fell ill from over work and exposure, and in the early spring of 1867 he returned home, leaving the work in the mountains ito be managed by others. The home- ward journey included one thousand miles of stage riding, day and night, and with his disease — ulceration of the intestines — from which he was scarcely convalescent, it is wonderful that he sur- vived it. At North Platte he met the Union Pacific railroad, building westward at the rate of three miles a day, and the rest of the journey was easily performed. Returning to his business in Southington, Mr. Clark at once set to work to improve and enlarge it. He enlarged the factory buildings and con- structed one-fourth of a mile of race-way of suf- ficient size to carry the average volume of the Quin- nipiac river at that place, thus doubling the water power of the company. This done, he attempted to restrain infringements upon his patents on dies and the process of forging carriage bolts, by other manufacturers. Three years of expensive litiga- tion followed, but resulted in establishing incon- testably his rights to the inventions, and ten or 17 twelve infringing firms were compelled to pay royalty for the use thereof. In 1882 Mr. Clark was nominated by the Re- publicans as a candidate for the State Senate, and elected by a handsome majority over a strong Democratic candidate. In the session of 1883 the Senate appointed him chairman of the committee on Military Affairs, which office he filled with patriotic and intelligent ability. In the session of 1884 he was chairman of the committees on Claims, and Temperance, and Constitutional Amendments, the latter reporting favorably the bill to establish biennial sessions of the General Assembly, which was adopted. In the hearings of the committee on Claims he had occasion to manifest his hatred of shams. Eminently kind to just claimants, he was untiring in opposing the fictitious or padded claims that lobbyists would seek to draw from the public treasury, and was esteemed, or disliked, accordingly. His most notable official action was, probably, his taking the opposition to the bill in the General Assembly of 1883 whereby the Aetna Life Insur- ance Co., "Stock Department," sought to cap- italize a large sum of money claimed to belong to it, but thought by some to have been improperly drawn from the "Mutual Department" in the manip- ulation of policies. The bill was pushed through, regardless of a demand for investigation, but Mr. Clark had marked it as deserving one, and he quietly employed an expert at his own expense before the next yearly session, and discovered the source of 18 the wonderful wealth of the Stock Department. In the session of 1884 he addressed the Senate on the subject, with an overflow of listeners on the floor and in the galleries, and with documentary,proof in abundance, begged for an investigation, but the influence against him was too powerful and his measure was rejected. He kept the matter alive, however, and had a bill presented to the Legisla- ture of 1887 for the same purpose. It was by this time so well understood, that seventy-five repre- sentatives were willing to stand up and be count- ed as in favor of an investigation. So the leaven worked, and to head it ofiF a "Substitute bill" was reported, empowering the Insurance Commis- sioner, under a general law, to investigate the methods of any insurance company, etc. That passed, and then it required eight or nine years more to discover an insurance commissioner witft the stamina requisite to call this great company, with forty millions of dollars of assets, to the bar of the court, for the mismanagement of its pol- icies and funds. Truly, as Mr. Clark then quoted, ** Though the mills of God grind slowly^ yet they grind exceeding smaliy In 1896 proceedings were commenced in the courts which verified all of the misdoings claimed by Mr. Clark, and the specified charges may be seen in the public rec- ords of the insurance department of that year, as published in "Part 2, Life Insurance Report, 1897." The court ordered a restoration of part of the diverted funds and enjoined any continuance of the irregular transactions complained of. 19 • In 1852 Mr. Clark was one of the charter mem- bers of Eureka Lodge, I. O. O. F., in his native town ; was chosen its first Vice Grand on May 16, of that year, and is in good standing in the order, having repeatedly been through the chairs. He has also been a delegate several times to the Grand Lodge of the State. In i88i,Mr. Clark with six other business men of Southington, organized The Southington Lum- ber & Feed Co.; to deal in builders' materials — also grain and feed ; it also conducted the largest coal-yard in the tow^n. "Sir. Clark has continued a director in the company to this time. The ven- ture under conservative but energetic manage- ment has been a success from the start. Mr. Clark also followed closely in his father's footsteps, in regard to the temperance movement ; so much so that no saloons could be run success- fully in the neighborhood of the factory. Since his retirement from active business life Mr. Clark has spent most of his time at his beautiful country seat, at Stony Creek, which overlooks Long Island Sound and the picturesque Thimble Islands. He is one of the Trustees of the Stony Creek Con- gregational Church, which he and his family attend. On Nov. 15, 1855, Mr. Clark married Sarah Jane Bradley, who, through her grandmother, Lydia Carey Montague, wife of Capt. Anson Matthews, traces descent from Drogo de Montagu, who came over to England with William the Conqueror, and, as we learn from the Roll of Battle Abbey, was one of the Norman knights who bore shields, or coats 20 armor, at the battle of Hastings, Oct. 14, 1066. A picture of Mrs, Clark, taken about the time of her marriage, shows her to have been a strik- ingly beautiful woman, with a distinguished car- riage. To this union came three children : Rosa- lind, born Dec. 16, 1857; Eugenie, born March 21, 1859, a specially bright, attractive child, who died March 26, 1861 ; and Marian, born July 26, i860, who died Oct. 7, i860. The only surviving child, Rosalind, married. May 20, 1882, the late Emerson Pratt. Mrs. Pratt has inherited from both sides of the house a strong personality, and is not altogether unknown in the world of art and public interests. Her daughter, Olive L. Pratt, born June 21, 1883, has inherited the genius of both father and mother, and shows decided musical and artistic ability. C^^ A^-e^O^r-r^-tyvi^^ ~C^^cc^7^ DEACON THEODOSIUS CLARK DEACON THEODOSIUS CLARK, the father of William J. Clark, was born in Cheshire, Conn., Oct. 22, 1/88, and reared on his father's farm, ob- taining his education by adding private study to the winter's work in the district school. On reach- ing maturity he showed a remarkably well dis- ciplined mind, and was ready to impart to others the knowledge that he had gained. At the age of eighteen he began teaching a district school in his native town, and, being successful, went across the town line in 1810 and took the "Southington Cor- ners" or Fourth District school, now known as Plantsville. Later he taught the schools in Plain- ville and Farmington, and also for many years those in the southern part of Southington. It was while thus employed that he met the youthful Miss Chloe Clark, of Southington, daugh- ter of Seth and Chloe (Bailey) Clark. A younger sister has related how, after Miss Clark's intro- duction to the young school teacher, and he had de- parted, she shook her finger at her sister, exclaim- 9.0 ing, as her dark eyes sparkled, "Isn't he handsome? I'm going to set my cap for him." That she did so with success, the sequel proves, and on Oct. 28, 1816. the young couple were joined together in matrimony. The combination of the two Clark lines was felicitous, and the children of the union were endowed, beyond the average, with marked intellectual and business ability and with long lives. About the time of his marriage Mr. Clark purchased a farm in the southern part of South- ington, having decided to make his home there, paying for it in part from his earnings as a teacher. His reputation for trustworthiness was such that he was trusted for the remainder of the amount, without bond or mortgage security, al- though having the title to the estate in his pos- session. On Aug. I, 1819, Mr. Clark transferred his membership from the Congregational Church at Cheshire, to that in Southington, the home of his adoption. He was appointed deacon, Feb. 16, 1834, and honored the office. His pastor, writing of him, says: "He at once put himself forward as a worker in the vineyard. No man in his part of the town more intelligently and acceptably conducted local religious meetings. In t^hat ca- pacity he was one of the chief leaders of the even- ing school house services that were held weekly in the various districts of the town, until he was incapacitated by age and disease. Often after a hard day's work on the farm he would ride three or four miles in the evening to attend those ser- 23 vices. So regular was he in his attendance, that his pastor, when too much wearied, or otherwise incapacitated to attend himself, relied upon Dea- con Clark, whom he felt sure would be there, to lead the people." "He was reluctant to accept the office of dea- con, and only took it as a matter of duty ; having assumed it, however, he at once planted himself at his pastor's side, ready with words of cheer and by zealous work to uphold his hands. He was among the first to advocate the establishment of the Sunday-school in his church, which was the first one in the town. For many years he was super- intendent, and while holding this office, as ever after, he was a teacher." Any want or woe of humanity enlisted his at- tention and help, and time and again would he turn out in stormy or inclement weather, to render as sistance to poor families, of whose needs he had heard. One of Mr. Clark's lifelong friends (who was also a cousin) was Andrew Hull Foote, of Cheshire, afterward Rear Admiral of the United States Navy and a frequent visitor at the Clark home, when on shore leave. Subsequent to organiz- ing the Sunday-school, Mr. Clark became inter- ested in other efforts for promoting the welfare of the community. Among them was theitemperance movement. The first step was an effort to induce every one to abandon the use of distilled liquors (there were several distilleries in the town produc- ing cider-brandy), but this did not accomplish the degree of sobriety desired, while the cellars were 24 annually filled with barrels of cider to be used as a beverage, through graduating degrees of hardness until consumed ; and the American Temperance Society, at a meeting held at Sara- toga in 1836 adopted the pledge of "total ab- stinence from all intoxicating liquors." This measure met Air. Clark's approval, and he at once co-operated with it, by banishing the cider- barrels from his own cellar, and shocked the employes on his farm by drawing their daily beverage from "the old oaken bucket." The shock was great, but the reaction was beneficial to all concerned, and later, when the Martha Washington Temperance Society was started in Connecticut, about 1 84 1, Mr. Clark was ready to welcome it, and work with it, to the extent of his ability. He was the chosen leader and first president of the first local branch in his town, and did much to further the cause by inviting reformed men of ability to come to the meetings and relate their experiences while under the "drink habit." Their vivid pictures of the suffering, degradation and poverty of those days, in contrast with the restored respect and com- fort of the present, led many other broken-down men back to the right path, and were the means of binding together again many broken-up homes. One of these lecturers was John B. Gough, who has left a name and history which the world will not soon forget. Mr. Clark was as ready to serve his country as his friends, and as a member of the Cavalry Company commanded by Col. Hoadly served in the war of 1812, receiving for this service 25 bounty land in Kansas and a pension, which is yet enjoyed by his widow. Mr. Clark had five children: (i) Harriet mar- ried Hezekiah C. Cuimmings, of Watertown, (2) Francis Judson, killed when two years of age by being run over by a cart. (3) William Judson, whose biographical sketch is given above. (4) Henry H. and (5) Charles H., both referred to in the Commemorative Biographical Record of Hartford County. On April 5, 1848, Mrs. Chloe Clark died sud- denly, of "putrid sore throat," undoubtedly the diphtheria of the present day. She had been to her husband a true helpmate, standing by his side in every good work, and to her children a mother whose memory will be precious as long as life lasts. On March 20, 1850, Mr. Clark married a second wife, Miss Sarah Morse, of Cheshire, who proved a pleasant companion during his decHning years, and who now, ninety-two years of age, survives him. Deacon Clark died July 27, 1865, and was burled in Quinnipiac Cemetery, Southington. In closing, we may quote the words spoken by his pastor at his funeral: "He has left us an example which we may follow with safety and advantage. * * * Whosoever liveth as he lived, may hope to die as he died — in favor with God and man, * * * Blessed are the dead which die in the Lord." CLARK GENEALOGY CLARK. Hon. William Judson Clark is a de- scendant of James Clark, who, with Gov. Eaton, Davenport and others, founded the Colony of New Haven, 1638-39, his name appearing as a signer of the Civil Compact, June 4, 1639. The name of his first wife, the mother of his children, is unknown; but he married, second, Oct. 17, 1661, Ann, widow of John Wakefield. James Clark died in January or February, 1688-89, ^"^ ^is body probably lies with those of the other fathers of the Colony, under the green sward of the beautiful "Green," of which the Elm City is so justly proud; for that was the "God's Acre" of the early colonists. Of the five children whom he left, (H) Ebenezer Clark, baptized at New Haven Nov. 29, 1 65 1, removed early to Wallingford, and died there April 30, 1721. His first wife was Mary Peck, whom he married May 6, 1678. Among his children was (HI) Stephen Clark, born Dec. 18, 1686, who lived in that part of Wallingford now called Che- 27 shire, and died there Nov. 25, 1750. He married (first) Lydia Hotchkiss, who was the mother of his son, (IV) Stephen Clark, born in 172 1, who died at Cheshire Nov. 4, 1800. His wife was Ruth Burr, who, through her mother, Mabel Clark, was a de- scendant, in the fifth generation, of Nicholas Clark, of Hartford, 1635, its first white settler. He was numbered among the "original proprietors," and for his service in the Pequot war, 1636-37, received an allotment in the "Soldiers' Field." Through her father, Lieut. Baze Burr, she descended from Ben- jamin Burr, who probably came over in Winthrop's fleet in 1630, and was an "original proprietor" and large land owner of Hartford ; and from John Baisey, another "original proprietor" of Connecti- cut's capital city. The names of these three early settlers, with that of Elder John White, another ancestor, are inscribed on the "Founders' Monu- ment," the tall, brownstone shaft which stands in the historic graveyard just back of Center Church, on Main street. (V) Amasa Clark, son of Stephen and Ruth Clark, born at Cheshire Nov. 25, 1753, died there Dec. 30, 1833. He married Lydia (Hull) Judson, widow of Joseph Judson, of Bethlehem, Conn., and among their children was (VI) Theodosius Clark, born Oct. 22. 1788, of Cheshire and Southington, VN^here he died July 27, 1865. Through his wife, Chloe Clark, comes in another line of Clark ancestry, beginning with (I) William Clark, of Hartford, 1639; and in 28 1 662 one of the twenty-eight young men who went from that place to make homes in the unopened lands of the Connecticut Valley. In 1668 the name of the "Plantation at Thirty Mile Island" was changed to Haddam, doubtless from a tender recol- lection of Haddam, Hertfordshire, England, the English home of most of its early settlers. William Clark died there in 1681. His son, (II) Sergt. John Clark, of Middletown, mar- ried Elizabeth, daughter of Capt. Nathaniel White, of Middletown, whose naime is held in high honor, not only in the town whose interests he served so well, but all over the country, wherever his de- scendants have carried the name. For over fifty years he represented Middletown in the Legisla- ture, the last time when he was an old, white- haired man of eighty-one. He filled, also, the of- fices of magistrate and commissioner for Middle- town, Haddam and Meriden. Nor, though serving his country well in her peaceful legislative halls, did he shrink when sterner duties called, as witness his title of "captain." (III) Daniel Clark, son of Sergt. John and Elizabeth, of Middletown, 1680-1725, married Eliz- abeth W^hittemore, daughter of Lieut. Francis Whittemore, 1650-1700, another of Middletown's early settlers whose name she delights to honor. Their son, (IV) Deacon Joseph Clark, 1720- 1778, town clerk of Middletown from 1765 to 1777, also deacon of the church there, married Joanna Fairchild, of Stratford, who brought into the Clark family the 29 goodly heritage of a long line of distinguished Strat- ford ancestors, of whom, later. Their son, (V) Seth Clark, of Aliddletown and Southing- ton, 1 768- 1 85 1, married in 1793 Chloe Bailey, and their daughter, (VI) Chloe Clark, of Southington, by marry- ing Theodosius Clark, of Cheshire, merged her Clark line into that of another. Joanna Fairchild, 1727-1793, wife of (IV) Dea- con Joseph Clark, of Middletown, was descended from Thomas Fairchild, an early settler of Strat- ford, who died there in 1670, and his second wife, Katherine Craig; also from William Wilcoxen and Deacon John Birdseye. Through her mother, Kath- erine Coe, she descended from Robert Coe, born in Suffolkshire, England, in 1596, who, with wife and children, emigrated to New England in 1634; and from^ Matthew Mitchell, of Southouram Parish of Halifax, England, and his wife, Susan Butterfield, whom he married at Ovenden, in the same parish, in 1616. Emigrating to this country- in 1635, and suffering severely from sickness, fire and savage warfare, in the various places where he settled, he bore it all with Christian patience. He died in 1645, at Stamford, Conn., of which place he was one of the founders, and had served it as magistrate, representative and associate judge of the Plantation Court. Mrs. Joanna (Fairchild) Clark also de- scended from Joseph Hawley, born in Derbyshire, England, in 1603, who died at Stratford, Conn., May 20, 1690. He was town clerk at Stratford six- teen years, town treasurer several years, and also 30 surveyor. In 1687 he was chosen one of the com- mittee for considering and drafting a patent for the town. He was deputy to the General Court nineteen years, and commissioner eight years. Lydia Hull, wife of (V) Amasa Clark, born in Cheshire July 23, 1753, belonged to the noted Hull family, being a descendant of the sixth gen- eration from (I) Richard Hull, of Derbyshire, Eng- land, who settled at New Haven in 1639. His son, (H) Dr. John Hull, of Stratford, Derby and Wallingford, was a prominent man in each of these places, serving as selectman and representative. In 1687 the General Assembly granted him 700 acres of land for services in King Philip's war. His son, (III) Dr. Benjamin Hull, 1672-1741, married Elizabeth Andrews, daughter of William Andrews, an early settler of New Haven. Dr. Hull was a prominent physician in Wallingford. His son, (IV) Dr. John Hull, 1702-1762, married Sarah Ives, a great-granddaughter of William Ives, a set- tler of New Haven in 1639; also of Capt. Nathaniel Merriman, an early and prominent settler of New Haven and Wallingford, and a soldier in both the Pequot and King Philip's wars. His son, (V) Dr. Zephaniah Hull, 1728^1760, of Che- shire and Bethlehem, Conn., married Hannah Doo- little, daughter of Lieut. Moses Doolittle, a promi- nent man in Cheshire, and a grandson of Abraham Doolittle, an early settler of New Haven and Wal- lingford, and chief officer or sheriff of New Ha- ven Colony in 1644. He was sergeant of the train- band, and a member of the vigilance committee in 31 King Philip's war; also deputy froaii Wallingford eight times. Through his mother, (III) Hannah Hall, wife of Ebenezer DooHttle, Lieut. Moses was a grandson of (H) Capt. Samuel Hall, 1648-1725, who took an active part in the French and Indian wars, and served as deputy from Wallingford to the General Court four years. He was a son of (I) John Hall, an early settler of New Haven, and a soldier in the Pequot war, 1637. He married, at New Haven, in 1641, Jeanne Wolen, of Huguenot ancestry. Both the Hall and Wolen families bear coats of arms, as do also the Coe, Mitchell and Hawley families, mentioned above. il ( I I 4C-136 ^c A-' '^^ > .^. ^x " « -.* <.^ y -^^ °.wi .0' '>,^ ■% \ i>^ .->> O « , <$> ♦ ^*.\\V V , ."^■^^"i^^. •^- ■-^, A**^ " " " * *'<^ i^?7)i:^ "^ '^ ^o -,:9. ■^^. kV "^ •-!^: J V ^• .V ^b i* '\^ ■..^•^ A > ,' >* :^. '•.»«> . I. ♦ A ^ V^ P'V. o. -m 'o . » • A .^'% • <^ i • 1 r'^:- . "Jy" " " " » <^ 0^ • i o^ .•^'' ^ "t-. "o, » , 1 • o " n^' .1^' ^v* • • • * ^' "^-0^ 4 o^ ,0 •0" a- // ^- <. .^'^ ^o \0 b • -. - e . o ' ^O'^ DOBBSBROS. .r. ^ • ^ rA » • • % ,AR 8? ST. AUGUSTINE liiiii liii iSMilililiffikl' LIBRARY OF CONGRESS llliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiililiiiiilllllllllllll 021 549 425 1 ;^iilii; !ii[i;i;!Ki;'ii;iii:i