A* .r- V \> r.,^- '% bo" o , -> » .0 cv ^ - I - ° v V^' : ■ ^ ^ ***. <* %^" £ -%. \ $ • V -%. ** Pa % ■ 0o " W ' **% \ o ' ^ ^% 4 ^ 4 ^.S' ?,* ' ** v % ^,. ^ '> v tf "5 << ^ ^ ^. v * a* -tt RIVAL SULTANAS f ../F0& l^-WWSZS Rival Sultanas: Nell Gwyn, Louise de K&roualle, and Hortense Mancini By H. Noel Williams :: Author of "Five Fair Sisters," "A Princess of Intrigue" " Unruly Daughters" &c. With 25 Illustrations, ineluding & Frontispiece in Photogravure NEW YORK DODD. MEAD AND COMPANY 1915 « *1 tt. 6 «* Printed in Great Britain Bequost Albert Adsit Clemona Aug. 24, 1938 (Not available for exchange^ CONTENTS CHAP. I. — The Early Loves of Charles II. II. — The Beginnings of Nell Gwyn III. — Nell Gwyn and Lord Buckhurst IV. — " The King sends for Nelly " V. — The Merry Monarch . VI. — Nell leaves the Stage . VII. — The Treaty of Dover . VIII. — The Accession of Louise de Keroualle IX. — Intrigues, political and otherwise X. — Louise de Keroualle becomes Duchess of Portsmou XL — The Duchess of Portsmouth and Nell Gwyn XII.— Madame de Mazarin enters the Lists XIII. — Triumph of Madame de Mazarin . XIV. — Charles, Louis and the Parliament XV— The Popish Plot XVI. — The Exclusion Bill .... XVII. — The Triumph of the Court . XVIII. — Le Roi s' amuse ..... XIX. — The Duchess of Portsmouth visits France XX. — The Episode of the Grand Prior . XXI. — Nell Gwyn's Letters .... XXIL— The Death of Charles II. XXIIL— The Last Days of Nell Gwyn XXIV. — Exeunt Portsmouth and Mazarin . page I 29 47 61 67 87 94 in 128 143 159 177 201 217 239 258 283 296 3°3 313 321 33o 34i 349 TO MY WIFE LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Nell Gwyn ....... Photogravure frontispiece From the painting by Sir Peter Lely in the National Portrait Gallery. to face page Barbara Villiers, Countess of Castlemaine, afterwards Duchess of Cleveland ........ . . 14 From the painting by Sir Peter Lely at Hampton Court. Frances Stuart, Duchess of Richmond (" La Belle Stuart"). . 24 From a photograph by W. J. Roberts, after a painting by Sir Peter Lely at Good- wood, reproduced by permission of the Earl of March. Nell Gwyn .42 From an engraving by Wright, after the painting by Sir Peter Lely. Charles Sackville, Lord Buckhurst ..... 52 From an engraving after S. Harding. Mary, called Moll, Davis -38 From an engraving after S. Harding. Charles II. ........... 76 From the picture by Mary Beale in the National Portrait Gallerv (photo by Emery Walker). Nell Gwyn 88 From a mezzotint engraving by P. V. B., after the painting by Sir Peter Lely. Louise de Keroualle, Duchess of Portsmouth .... 102 From the painting by Pierre Mignard in the National Portrait Gallery. Catherine of Braganza, Queen of England .... .132 From an engraving by S. Freeman, after the painting by Sir Peter Lely. James, Duke of York, afterwards James II 146 From the painting by Sir Peter Lely at St. James's Palace (photo by Emery Walker). Copyright of H. M. the King. Thomas Osborne, Earl of Danby, afterwards first Duke of Leeds 166 From an engraving by Freeman, after the painting by Van der Vaart. Nell Gwyn with her two Sons 172 From an engraving by Tompson, after the painting by Sir Peter Lely. Hortense Mancini, Duchesse de Mazarin 178 From an engraving by Valete, after the painting by Sir Peter Lely. Honors Courtin, Seigneur de Chantreine 196 From an engraving by Nanleuil. viii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS to face page Charles Beauclerk, Earl of Burford, afterwards Duke of St. Albans 210 From a painting in the collection of Lord de L'Isle and Dudley. Jean Jacques Barrillon 224 From a contemporary print. Anthony Ashley Cooper, first Earl of Shaftesbury . . 248 From an engraving by R. White. James Scott, Duke of Monmouth 264 From the painting in the National Portrait Gallery (photo by Emery Walker). Nell Gwyn 298 From a mezzotint engraving by J. Becket, after the painting by Simon Verhelst. Louise de Keroualle, Duchess of Portsmouth .... 306 From the painting by Sir Godfrey Kneller in the collection of the Duke of Rich- mond, K.G. Philippe de Vendome, Grand Prior of France . . . . 314 From a contemporary print. John Wilmot, second Earl of Rochester ..... 324 From a painting, probably by Wissing. Nell Gwyn 344 From the painting by Sir Peter Lely at Althorp, photographed by kind permission of Earl Spencer. Charles Lennox, first Duke of Richmond ..... 352 From the painting by Sir Godfrey Kneller in the collection of the Duke of Rich- mond, K.G. RIVAL SULTANAS CHAPTER I THE EARLY LOVES OF CHARLES II TT may be said that his inclinations to Love were the effects of health and a good constitution, with as little mixture of the seraphick part as ever man had. And though from that foundation men often raise their passions, I am apt to think that his stayed as much as any man's ever did in the lower region. This made him like easy mistresses. They were generally resigned to him while he was abroad, with an implied bargain. Heroick, refined lovers place a good deal of their pleasure in difficulty, both for the vanity of conquest, and as a better earnest of their kindness. " After he was restored, mistresses were recommended to him, which is no small matter in a Court, and not un- worthy of the thoughts even of a party. A mistress, either dexterous herself or well instructed by those that are so, may be very useful to her friends, not only in the immediate hours of her ministry, but by her influence and insinuations at all times. It was resolved generally by others whom he should have in his arms, as well as 2 RIVAL SULTANAS whom he should have in his Councils. For a man who was capable of choosing, he chose as seldom as any man that ever lived. " He had more properly, at least in the beginning of his time, a good stomach to his mistresses than any great passion for them. His taking them from others was never learnt in a romance, and indeed fitter for a philo- sopher than a knight-errant. His patience for their frailties showed him no exact lover. It is a heresy, according to a true lover's creed, even to forgive an infidelity, or the appearance of it. Love of ease will not do it where the heart is much engaged ; but where mere nature is the motive, it is possible for a man to think righter than the common opinion, and to argue that a rival taketh away nothing but the heart, and leaveth all the rest. " He had wit enough to suspect and he had wit enough not to care. The ladies got a great deal more than would have been allowed an equal bargain in Chancery for what they did for it ; but neither the manner nor the measure of pleasure is to be judged by others." Thus wrote that shrewd observer of human character, George Savile, Marquis of Halifax, of Charles II. and his mistresses, and those who have studied the career of the Merry Monarch will not find much with which to disagree. There was certainly little enough of the romantic lover about Charles II. If he never descended so low as Louis XV. and certain other licentious princes, he was quite incapable of cherishing a genuine passion, such as his famous grandfather, Henri of Navarre, entertained THE EARLY LOVES OF CHARLES II 3 for Gabrielle d'Estrees. He did not even demand, like Louis XIV., that his mistresses should at any rate pretend to be in love with him. So long as they were at hand to amuse him in his idle hours, he appears to have cared little what they did at other times. It is doubtful if there is another king in history who would have tolerated the glaring infidelities of Barbara Villiers. Yet they seldom provoked in Charles more than a momentary irritation, and that was caused, not so much by jealousy or disgust as by the doubts which they occasioned whether the children to which the sultana gave birth were his or another's. Of Charles II. it might be observed, as was said of Philippe d'Orleans, Regent of France, that he had one of those precocious temperaments of which La valeur n'attend le nombre des ann^es, since if he did not quite succeed in equalling the achieve- ment of that prince, who was commonly reported to have become a father in his fifteenth year,* he ran it pretty close, and before he left Jersey (June, 1646), when he was barely sixteen, he had already acquired that distinction. Mr. Osmund Airy, in his monograph on Charles II., gives some interesting details concerning his Majesty's firstborn — a son — whose existence appears entirely to have escaped the notice of most historians : " The secret was well kept, so well, indeed, that for more than twenty years afterwards, at the time that * See the author's " Unruly Daughters " (London, Hutchinson ; New York, Scribner, 19 13). I* 4 RIVAL SULTANAS Charles was desirous of being received into the Catholic Church, he was able to inform the General of the Jesuits that it was known to but two other persons, the Queen of Sweden and Henrietta Maria. Of the mother we know absolutely nothing more than Charles dis- closes in the same letter. ' The boy was born/ he says, ' of a young lady who was amongst the most distinguished in our Kingdom, more from the frailty of our first youth than from any ill intentions or great depravity.' With her wrecked life, her motherhood which was her shame, she passes like a nameless shadow across the page. Of the child we hear more. In 1665 he was in London, and on September 27 of that year Charles gave a written acknowledgment that James Stuart was his natural son, having lived in France and elsewhere under an assumed name up to that date. Charles further ordered that he should be known as James de la Cloche du Bourg de Jarsey, and prohibited him from disclosing his birth until after his own death, when he might present this declaration to Parliament. The boy then went to Holland to pursue his studies. A year and a half later (February, 1667), Charles sent him another paper — which, like the first, still exists in the archives of the Jesuits — assigning to him, if it pleased his successor and Parliament, £500 a year, so long as he lived in London and remained a member of the English Church. On April 29, 1667, the young man was recon- ciled to Rome, and this circumstance led to another meeting with his father. ... In August, 1668 — if the documents in the archives of the Jesuits can be regarded as genuine — he had sent to the General of the Order a request that the son of his Jersey boyhood might THE EARLY LOVES OF CHARLES II 5 be sent to him, in order that he might practise with him in secret the mysteries of the Catholic religion, ' without giving a shade of suspicion that we are Catholic' But the hope that he might be received into the Catholic Church, while outwardly appearing a Protestant, was destroyed by the uncompromising statement of the Pope in the case of James that even the Head of the Church himself had no power to grant such a dispensation." Charles II. had undoubtedly an eye for beauty, but otherwise his mistresses did not do much credit to his good taste, and their haughtiness, infidelities, extrava- gance and jealousy of one another gave him at different times plenty of occupation. Lucy Walter, the companion of his wanderings and the mother of the ill-fated Duke of Monmouth, publicly disgraced herself and everyone connected with her. The daughter of William Walter, of Roch Castle in Pem- brokeshire, a Royalist gentleman whose ancestral home was taken and burnt by the Parliamentary forces in 1644, after holding out bravely for the King, Lucy is said to have been born about 1630. After the destruction of Roch Castle, the members of the Walter family were separated, and at the end of the year 1647, or early in 1648, Lucy, as James II. afterwards put it, " having little means and less grace, came to London to make her fortune." Here she is believed to have resided with her mother's sister, Margaret Prothero, who had married a Dutch merchant of St. Dunstan's in the West, named Gosfright. This aunt would scarcely seem to have kept a very strict watch on her niece, for, soon after the young lady's coming to Town, we find Algernon Sidney, 6 RIVAL SULTANAS whose handsome head was to fall on the scaffold after the Rye House Plot, " trafficking " with her for her virtue. But, before this dishonourable arrangement could be concluded, Algernon's regiment received marching orders, and it was his brother, Colonel Robert Sidney, to whose persuasions Lucy eventually yielded. Him she accompanied to The Hague, where she was seen by Charles II., who straightway fell in love with her and lost no time in getting her away from Robert Sidney, who was, perhaps, not unwilling to part with the lady. On April 9, 1649, Lucy gave birth to a son (after- wards the Duke of Monmouth), whom Charles acknow- ledged as his. But the fact that his Majesty did not arrive at The Hague until the middle of September, 1648, occasioned serious doubts as to whether this was the case ; and it is certain that, when he grew to man- hood, the Duke of Monmouth bore a much stronger resemblance to Robert Sidney than he did to his reputed father. We need not discuss here the claim put forward by Monmouth and his partisans that a marriage had been celebrated between Charles and Lucy Walter, which gained sufficient credence to make the King, in June, 1678, consider it necessary to publish a declaration, which was entered in the Council-book and registered in Chancery, and stated " that, to avoid any dispute which might happen in time to come concerning the succession of the Crown, he did declare, in the presence of Almighty God, that he never gave, nor made any contract of marriage, nor was married to Mrs. Barber, alias Waters, the Duke of Monmouth's mother, nor to THE EARLY LOVES OF CHARLES II 7 any other woman whatsoever, but to his present wife, Queen Catherine, then living." That the claim was a baseless one is beyond dispute, though it is quite possible, and even probable, that Charles had promised Lucy marriage. During July and August, 1649, Lucy was with Charles in Paris, and the respectable Evelyn, who travelled with her in Lord Wilmot's coach from Saint-Germain to the capital, describes her as " a brown, beautiful, bold, but insipid creature." Whether she also accompanied her royal lover to Jersey in the following September is not quite clear, but it is very probable that she did. When, in June, 1650, Charles set out for Scotland, he left his inamorata at The Hague, where her conduct in itself constituted a sufficient refutation of the supposed marriage. For no sooner was the prince safely out of the way, than she began to look about her for consola- tion and found it in the person of Colonel Henry Bennet (afterwards Earl of Arlington), whom in due course she presented with a daughter.* Not satisfied with the attentions paid by this gentleman, she was also generally believed to have had tender relations with Lord Taafe (afterwards second Earl of Carling- ford) and Colonel Thomas Howard, brother of James, Earl of Suffolk. On his return to the Continent in 165 1, Charles wisely terminated his connection with this woman — though he continued to keep her well supplied with money, notwithstanding the empty state of the privy * This daughter, Mary by name, married William Sarsfield, a brother of Patrick, Earl of Lucan, and, after his death in 1675, William Fanshawe, Master of the Requests to Charles. 8 RIVAL SULTANAS purse — but he was to have much trouble before he was finally rid of her. Early in 1656 we find Daniel O'Neale, one of the Grooms of the Bedchamber, writing to his royal master from The Hague that he was " much troubled to see the prejudice hir [Lucy Walter] being here does your Majestie, for every idle action of hirs brings your Majestie uppon the stage." The particu- lar " idle action " which the writer had in mind was a murderous attack with a bodkin which the fair Lucy had made upon her maid, who had threatened to reveal certain highly compromising facts which had come to her ears, through the indiscretion of a midwife. To save a public scandal, O'Neale was obliged to have recourse to bribery. After this affair, efforts were made by the King's friends to persuade Lucy to return to England, and this she consented to do, in consideration of an annuity of £400 ; and was duly shipped off from Flushing, being accompanied by her two children, her maid, her brother, and her admirer Thomas Howard. Previous to her departure, she had an interview with Charles, either at Antwerp or Brussels, where he pre- sented her with a pearl necklace valued at .£1,500. In London, she took lodgings over a barber's shop, not far from Somerset House, where she passed as a Dutch widow ; but her identity was soon discovered by Cromwell's intelligence department, and towards the end of June, 1656, she and her maid Ann Hill were arrested as spies and clapped into the Tower. Here they were detained until July 16, when they were dis- charged ; and Cromwell issued an order to send away " Charles Stuart's lady of pleasure and the young THE EARLY LOVES OF CHARLES II 9 heir and set them on shore in Flanders, which is no ordinary courtesie." August found Lucy and her suite back in Brussels, where fresh scandals followed their arrival, and it was found necessary to place the lady and the future Duke of Monmouth in a sort of captivity in the house of Charles's Ambassador. Finally, the unfortunate King, who had already made several ineffectual attempts to get possession of his son, whom he accused the mother of " making a property of to support herself in those wild and disgraceful courses she hath taken," was at last successful, and placed the boy in the care of Henrietta Maria. Deprived of the royal favour and separated from her son, to whom, to do her justice, she appears to have been tenderly attached, Lucy was compelled to leave Brussels, where the authorities, indeed, had only tolerated her presence out of consideration for Charles. She made her way to Paris, still beautiful, according to Erskine, and is said to have lived a very depraved life, from the consequences of which, if we are to believe Clarendon, she died in the autumn of 1658. There are several paintings of Lucy Walter. Among them may be mentioned the painting by Lely at Kneb- worth House ; the demi-nude portrait in the possession of the Marquis of Bute, which was engraved by Van der Berghe for Harding's " Gramont ; " and two miniatures at Montagu House. At Ditchley is a portrait of Lucy and the Duke of Monmouth as the Madonna and Child. Worthless as was Lucy Walter, the mistress whose io RIVAL SULTANAS reign began immediately on Charles's restoration to the throne, and continued for more than twelve years, was even worse. Barbara Villiers, afterwards Countess of Castlemaine and Duchess of Cleveland, was the only child of William Villiers, second Viscount Grandison, who fell fighting for the King at the siege of Bristol, and Mary, daughter of the first Viscount Bayning. William Villiers is de- scribed by Clarendon as a pattern of virtue, in which respect his daughter unfortunately was very far from taking after him ; indeed, if we are to believe the gossip that was in circulation about her in later years, her amorous propensities had been discerned when she was still a little girl. " This afternoon," writes Pepys, " walking with Sir W. Cholmley long in the gallery, he told me, among many other things, how Harry Killigrew* is banished from Court, for saying that my Lady Castlemaine was a little lecherous girl when she was young. . . . That she complained to the King, and he sent to the Duke of York, whose servant he is, to turn him away. The Duke of York has done it, but taken it ill of the Lady. She attended to excuse herself, but ill blood is made."| After the untimely death of her first husband, Lady Grandison married her kinsman, Charles Villiers, Earl of Anglesey, at whose house in London Barbara was brought up. With her wealth of dark auburn hair, her blue eyes, her perfect features, and her exquisite figure, she was one of the most lovely girls that one could wish * He was the son of Thomas Killigrew, and at this time Groom of the Bed- chamber to the Duke of York. J Pepys's Diary, October 21, 1666. THE EARLY LOVES OF CHARLES II n to see ; and, such being the case, it is surprising that her mother and step-father, who must surely have been aware of her inclinations for the opposite sex, should have permitted her the liberty which she seems to have enjoyed. Any way, at the age of seventeen, she had fallen desperately in love with the young Earl of Chesterfield, grandfather of the letter-writer, a hand- some young spark, who appears to have been capable of carrying on as many love-affairs at the same time as was the celebrated Marechal de Richelieu in later years, and was only too ready to respond to her passion. The nature of the relations which existed between them may be inferred from the following letter addressed by Barbara to the earl : " It is ever my ill fortune to be disappointed of what I most desire, for this afternoon I did promise myself the satisfaction of your company ; but I feare I am disappointed, which is no small affliction to me ; but I hope the faits may yet be so kind as to let me see you about five o'clock ; if you will be at your private lodgings in Lincoln's Inn Fields, I will endeavour to come." In 1659 Barbara became the wife of Roger Palmer, son of Sir James Palmer, a Buckinghamshire gentleman, and heir to a considerable fortune. It was a marriage of convenience on both sides, and was far from putting an end to the Chesterfield affair, for shortly afterwards we find the lady writing to her noble admirer that she was " ready and willing to go all over the world with him." That Barbara entertained a genuine passion for Ches- terfield admits of no doubt. " My dear life," she writes 12 RIVAL SULTANAS to him, when lying ill of small-pox, " I have been this day extremely ill, and the not hearing from you hath made me much worse than otherwayes I should have been. The doctor doth believe me in a desperate condition, and I must confess that the unwillingniss I have to leave you makes me not intertaine the thoughts of death so willingly as otherwise I should : for there is nothing beside yourselfe that could make me desire to live a day, and if I am never so happy as to see you more, yet the last words I will say shall be a praire for your happiness, and so I will live and dey loving you above all other things." Barbara's illness, which, fortunately for her, left no traces behind, and a duel in which Chesterfield killed his adversary and was obliged in consequence to remain in seclusion for a time, broke off the liaison, and later in the year the lady and her husband left England to join the Court of the exiled King in the Netherlands. It must have been now, and not as some writers have supposed after Charles's return to England, that his intimacy with Barbara began, since early in 1 660 we find Chesterfield, who was then at Bourbon-les-Bains, informing the latter that he had received " news con- cerning her ladyship which made him doubt of every- thing," and entreating her to send him her portrait, " for then he should love something that was like her, and yet unchangeable, and though it would have no great return of kindness, yet he was sure that it would love nobody else better than her very humble servant." The news to which Chesterfield refers was con- firmed soon after Charles's triumphal entry into London, and his Majesty's infatuation was patent to all the THE EARLY LOVES OF CHARLES II 13 world. On Shrove Monday, February 25, 1 660-1, was born Barbara's first child, Anne, afterwards Coun- tess of Sussex, the paternity of whom was claimed by Roger Palmer, but was afterwards acknowledged by the King (by a royal warrant of 1673), though the child was generally assigned to Chesterfield, whom, according to Lord Dartmouth,* she very much resembled both in face and person. Despite this, there seems to be no grounds for suspecting the earl, from whose letters to Barbara it would appear that the lady had for a long time past refused to have anything to do with him, and that even his billets-doux remained unanswered. In the following December, Roger Palmer received the reward of his complaisance by being created Earl of Castlemaine and Baron Limerick in the peerage of Ireland, and Pepys, who saw the patent at the Privy Seal Office, remarks upon the limitation of the honours to the lady's heirs male, " the reason whereof every- body knows." On March 13, 1662, the new Queen, Catherine of Braganza, arrived from Portugal. In honour of her arrival the principal citizens lighted bonfires before their doors, but there was none before that of Barbara's lodging. However, Charles, presumably to reassure his mistress, spent the evening with her, and, says Pepys, " the King did send for a pair of scales and they did weigh one another ; " and it was soon evident that it would require charms infinitely more potent than those which poor Queen Catherine possessed to lure his Majesty from the side of his inamorata. That lady, on her side, was determined that the * Burnet, " History of My Own Times." i 4 RIVAL SULTANAS Queen should not be permitted to remain under any delusion as to where her husband's affections lay, and designed that her approaching confinement should take place at Hampton Court, where the royal couple were spending their honeymoon. It was only with great difficulty that the King succeeded in persuading her to renounce this intention. Barbara's second child — Charles, afterwards Duke of Southampton — was born early in June, 1662. Castlemaine, who had recently joined the Church of Rome, caused the boy to be baptized by a priest, which furnished his consort with a pretext for leaving him and conveying all her effects and " all the servants except the porter " to her uncle's house at Richmond. Shortly afterwards, the child was baptized again, this time according to the rites of the Church of England, by the rector of St. Mary's, Westminster, the King and Aubrey de Vere, Earl of Oxford, being the two godfathers. That same day, the Queen, who up to this time had firmly refused to receive her rival, and had erased her name from the list of ladies of her bedchamber which had been submitted to her, was surprised into receiving the countess at Hampton Court. A painful scene followed. " The Queen was no sooner sate in her chair," writes Clarendon, " but her colour changed, and tears gushed out of her eyes and her nose bled and she fainted, so that she was forthwith removed into another room, and all the company retired out of that where she was before." This, so far from causing his Majesty to feel ashamed of himself, merely served to make him the more determined to force his mistress BARBARA VILLIERS, COUNTESS OF CASTLEMAINE AXD DUCHESS OF CLEVELAND From a painting by Sir Peter Lely at Hampton Court. THE EARLY LOVES OF CHARLES II 15 upon his unwilling consort, and Clarendon, to his intense disgust, was commissioned to persuade the Queen to submit to the indignity of receiving the favourite. For some time, however, the Chancellor made but little progress with his ungrateful task, and Charles and Lady Castlemaine became convinced that he was more than half-hearted in the matter. At length, the former, losing all patience, addressed to the Minister a letter couched in terms which plainly showed the irritation which he felt at his want of success. " Lest you may think," he writes, " that, by making a farther stir in the business, you may divert me from my resolution, which all the world shall never do, I wish I may be unhappy in this world and in the world to come, if I fail in the least degree of what I am resolved, which is of making my Lady Castlemaine of my wife's bedchamber, and whoever I find endeavour- ing to hinder this resolution of mine, except it be only to myself, I will be his enemy to the last moment of my life." Finding that there was no help for it if he wished to maintain his own position, Clarendon succeeded in overcoming the opposition of the Queen ; and at the beginning of September the King and Queen and Lady Castlemaine were seen riding together in the same coach, and the pacification of the royal household seemed to be complete. Lady Castlemaine had not remained long at Rich- mond, for, learning that her husband had gone to France, she promptly returned to Westminster, with all her goods and chattels. His lordship soon returned too, and on the day of the Queen's arrival at Whitehall from Hampton Court, Pepys saw them both watching 16 RIVAL SULTANAS the pageant from the roof of the Banqueting House though not together. " I glutted myself with looking on her," he writes, " but methought it was strange to see her lord and her upon the same place walking up and down without taking notice one of another, only at first entry he put off his hat, and she made him a very civil salute, but afterwards took no notice of one another ; but both of them now and then would take their child, which the nurse held in her arms, and dandle it." The diarist also relates an incident which shows that there must have been good points in the character of the favourite, notwithstanding what certain writers have maintained to the contrary : " One thing more, there happened a scaffold below to fall, and we feared some hurt, but there was none, but she of all the ladies only run down among the common rabble to see what hurt was done, and did take care of a child that received some little hurt, which methought was so noble. Anon, there came one there booted and spurred that she talked long with, and by and by, she being in her hair, she put on his hat, which was but an ordinary one, to keep the wind off. But methinks it became her mightily, as everything else do."* As will be gathered from the foregoing, our diarist was at this time, and indeed for long afterwards, a fervent admirer of Lady Castlemaine, or, at any rate, of her charms, and he seems to have admired her as much in lighter costumes as when in " full panoply ; " indeed, he assures us that even a glimpse of her laced * Pepys's Diary, August 23, 1662. THE EARLY LOVES OF CHARLES II 17 smock and linen petticoats, " laced with real lace at the bottom," floating in the breeze one May morning in the Privy Garden " did him good." In the follow- ing October, he tells us of a visit which he paid to Sir Peter Lely's studio in the Piazza, Covent Garden, where among other pictures he saw " the so much desired by me picture of my Lady Castlemaine, which is a most blessed picture and that I must have a copy of." And some weeks later he speaks of visiting the engraver Faithorne's and carrying home with him " three of my Lady Castlemaine's heads." In the late summer of that year, her ladyship had official lodgings assigned her hard by the Cockpit at Whitehall, which soon became a focus of intrigue against Clarendon, in whom the sultana recognized an obstacle which it was necessary to remove at all costs. Before the end of the year she and her allies had succeeded in bringing about the dismissal of the Chancellor's old and tried friend, Sir Edward Nicholas, who was succeeded in his post of Secretary by Sir John Bennet, afterwards Earl of Arlington. At the beginning of 1663 it was reported that Barbara's influence was declining. The cause of this was the appearance upon the scene of a rival beauty, in the person of Frances Theresa Stuart, commonly known as " La Belle Stuart." The lady in question was the elder daughter of Walter Stuart, third son of the first Lord Blantyre, whose family was related to the Royal House of Stuart. Frances was born about the year 1647, and educated in France, of which country she had assimilated the tastes, particularly in the matter of dress. Pepys tells us that Louis XIV. 2 1 8 RIVAL SULTANAS " cast his eyes upon her and would fain have had her mother, who is one of the most cunning women in the world, to let her stay in France, as an ornament to his Court." But Mrs. Stuart was not without her suspicions as to the Most Christian King's intentions, and preferred to accept for her daughter the post of maid of honour to Catherine of Braganza. And so, in January, 1662, Frances came to England, and Charles II. 's sister, the Duchesse d'Orleans, wrote to the King : " I would not loose this opportunity of writing to you by Mrs. Stewart, who is taking over her daughter to become one of the Queen, your wife's, future maids. If this were not the reason of her departure, I should be very unwilling to let her go, for she is the prettiest girl in the world, and one of the best fitted I know to adorn a Court." Such appeared to be the general opinion at White- hall, and the young lady was speedily surrounded by admirers, foremost among whom was the King himself, whose passion soon became the talk of both Court and town. " Meeting Mr. Pierce, walked with him an hour in the Matted Gallery," writes Pepys at the beginning of February, 1662-3. " Among other things, he tells me that my Lady Castlemaine is not at all set by by the King ; but that he do doat upon Mrs. Stewart* only ; and that to the leaving of all business in the world, and to the open slighting of the Queen ; that he values not who sees him or stands by him while he dallies with her openly, and then privately in her chamber below, where the very sentries observe his going in and out." * At this period unmarried ladies were called Mistress. THE EARLY LOVES OF CHARLES II 19 The writer, despite his admiration for Lady Castle- maine, is fain to award the palm to the new beauty and professes no surprise that the royal affections were being diverted in that direction. Speaking of a visit which he paid one July day in 1663 to St. James's Park to see their Majesties pass, he observes : " It was the finest sight to me, considering their great beauties and dress, that ever I did see in my life. But above all, Mrs. Stewart in this dress, with her hat cocked and a red plume, with her sweet eye, little Roman nose, and excellent taille, is now the greatest beauty I ever saw, I think, in my life, and if ever woman can, do exceed my Lady Castlemaine, at least in this dress, nor do I wonder if the King changes, which I verily believe is the reason of his coldness to my Lady Castlemaine." About this time rumours were current that " La Belle Stuart " had become the mistress of the King. But the young lady, if she were a little frivolous and empty-headed — Anthony Hamilton says that it would have been hardly possible for a woman to have less wit and more beauty, while her favourite amusements appear to have been blindman's buff, hunt the slipper, and card-building — knew how to take care of her own interests, and she had shrewd advisers in her mother and Henrietta Maria. In November, Lord Sandwich told Pepys, that Buckingham, Arlington and one or two other unscrupulous courtiers had formed them- selves into " a committee for the getting of Mrs. Stewart for the King, but that she proves a cunning slut, and is advised at Somerset House by the Queen-Mother and her [own] mother, and so all the plot is spoiled and the whole committee broke." 2* 20 RIVAL SULTANAS Lady Castlemaine naturally bitterly resented the King's infatuation for her young rival, and sought revenge by encouraging fresh admirers, among whom were Harry Jermyn and Sir Charles Berkeley. The latter was reported to have been seen by Captain Ferrers, an officer of the Guards, in her ladyship's bedchamber at the hour when she retired to rest, though this may have been merely idle gossip. Nevertheless, though his Majesty was so far from neglecting his sultana that he spent on an average four evenings a week at her lodgings, he for a long time refused to acknowledge her second son, Henry Fitzroy, afterwards created Duke of Grafton, who came into the world on September 20, 1663. By way of consolation, however, he handed over to the mother all the Christmas presents which he had received from the peers. Shortly afterwards, Lady Castlemaine's conversion to the Church of Rome was announced, a step which may have been taken in the hope of pleasing her royal lover, who, as we have seen, was secretly desirous of joining the same communion. " If the Church of Rome," remarked Stillingfleet, " has got no more by her than the Church of England has lost, the matter will not be much." On September 5, 1664, Lady Castlemaine gave birth to her fourth child, and a month later, to the great indignation of Charles, was publicly rebuked by three masked men, while walking in St. James's Park, accom- panied only by a maid and a little page. " They even went so far as to remind her that the mistress of Edward IV. [Jane Shore] died on a dunghill, scorned and abandoned by everybody. You can well imagine THE EARLY LOVES OF CHARLES II 21 that the time seemed long to her, for the park extends over a larger space than from Reynard's to the Pavilion. As soon as she was in her bedroom, she fainted. The King being informed of this, ran to her, caused all the gates to be shut, and all the people to be found in the park to be arrested. Seven or eight persons who happened thus to be caught were brought in, but could not be identified."* During the Plague year Lady Castlemaine migrated with the Court to Hampton Court and Oxford, and on December 28 Merton College had the honour of being the birthplace of another son, George Fitzroy, after- wards created Duke of Northumberland. Soon after the return of their Majesties to White- hall, the countess received orders to quit the Court, in consequence of a spiteful remark she had made about Charles in the presence of the Queen. But the dis- grace was only a momentary one, for, if the affection of the King for her was decreasing, her tyranny held him in subjection; and in the summer of 1667 the easy-going monarch is said to have been obliged to beg her pardon on his knees for his well-founded suspicions in regard to her intimacy with Harry Jermyn. The reconciliation was sealed by the gift of 5,600 ounces of plate from the jewel-house. Immense sums, it may here be mentioned, were lavished at different times upon the favourite, who was as sordid and rapacious as she was depraved. Three months after the Restoration (August 20, 1660), she was granted, by letters patent, a mortgage upon, or * Letter of Cominges, French Ambassador in England, to Lionne, October 2, 1664, cited by M. Jusserand, " A French Ambassador at the Court of Charles II." 22 RIVAL SULTANAS pension from, the Mint of " twopence per tale out of every pound weight troy of silver money which should henceforth be coined by virtue of any warrant or indenture made or to be made by his Majesty, his heirs, and successors, from the 9th of August, 1660, for 21 years." By letters patent dated January 19, 1664, she was granted .£4,700 a year out of the revenue of the Post Office. Besides these, she had several other pensions and was concerned in the promotion of various grants, monopolies and other sources of revenue, and in the sale of public offices and places about the Court. But, great as must have been her income, it was all too small for her expenditure, for she was wildly extrava- gant and a prodigious gambler, winning or losing as much as .£25,000 at cards in a single night ; and in the winter of 1666 the King paid .£30,000 out of the privy purse to settle her debts. Meanwhile, Charles continued his pursuit of " La Belle Stuart " with unremitting ardour ; but, though that young lady had no objection to receiving the splendid jewels which he showered upon her, he got nothing but kisses in return,* and even an offer to create her a duchess and to " rearrange his seraglio," failed to overcome her resistance. There can be no doubt that the King's feeling for the beautiful maid of honour approached nearer to what may be called love than any other of his libertine attach- ments. As early as 1663, when Catherine of Braganza was so ill that Extreme Unction had to be administered, * But she appears to have been generally credited with giving a good deal more, for in August, 1666, Pepys tells us that he had been informed " how for certain Mrs. Stewart do do everything with the King that a mistress should do." THE EARLY LOVES OF CHARLES II 23 a rumour was current that, in the event of the Queen's death, Frances Stuart might succeed her. " I despair of her [the Queen's] recovery," wrote the French Ambassador, Cominges, to Louis XIV. ..." The King seems to be deeply affected. Well! he supped none the less yesterday with Madame de Castlemaine, and had his usual talk with Mile. Stewart, of whom he is excessively fond. There is already a talk of his marrying again, and everybody gives him a new wife according to his own inclination ; and there are some who do not look beyond England to find one for him." In January, 1667, Miss Stuart's hand was sought by her kinsman Charles Stuart, third Duke of Rich- mond and sixth Duke of Lennox, who had only buried his second wife two or three weeks before. The King appeared to offer no objection, "pretending to take care of her that he would have good settlements made for her," says Bishop Burnet, adding that " he hoped by that means to have broken the matter decently, for he knew the Duke of Richmond's affairs were in disorder." But in secret, fearful of losing his inamorata, he sent for Archbishop Sheldon and inquired of him whether the Church of England would allow of a divorce, in a case where both parties were consent- ing and one lay under a natural incapacity for having children. Sheldon asked time for consideration, and, while he was pondering the matter, the Duke of Rich- mond and Miss Stuart effected a romantic elopement. One dark and stormy night, the maid of honour stole out of her rooms in Whitehall and joined her lover at the Bear Tavern, on the Southwark side of London Bridge, and " they stole away into Kent without the 24 RIVAL SULTANAS King's leave."* Charles, when he learned the news, was " furious as a satyr who has missed his clutch at a wood-nymph." f He suspected that Clarendon had got wind of his project of divorce through Sheldon, and had incited the Duke of Richmond to frustrate it by a prompt elopement. Burnet relates how on the night that Frances Stuart fled from Whitehall, the Chancellor's son, Lord Cornbury, who was quite un- aware of what had occurred, was going towards her apartments, when he met the King coming out " full of fury, and he, suspecting that Lord Cornbury was in this design, spoke to him as one in a rage that forgot all decency, and for some time would not hear Lord Cornbury speak in his own defence." The bishop adds that Charles's exasperation against Clarendon over this affair was responsible for his decision to deprive him of the Seals. Burnet probably exaggerates, for the Minister's suspected intervention between the King and the object of his passion was not the only cause of his Majesty's desire to get rid of him. But, as Masson points out, " it is certain that some such motives did mingle at last with Charles's other reasons * Pepys's Diary, April 3, 1667. Elsewhere Pepys tells us that he had it from Evelyn that, after the elopement, Frances Stuart had said to a certain nobleman that " she was come to that pass as to resolve to have married any gentleman of £1,500 a year that would have her in honour : for it was come to that pass that she could not longer continue at Court without prostituting herself to the King, whom she had so long kept off, though he had liberty more than other had, or he ought to have, as to dalliance. She told this lord that she had reflected upon the occasion she had given the world to think her a bad woman, and that she had no way but to marry and leave the Court, rather in this way of discontent than otherwise, that the world might see that she sought not anything but honour." t Mr. Osmund Airy, " Charles II." FRANCES STUART, DUCHESS OF RICHMOND (" LA BELLE STUART") From a photograph by W. J. Roberts, after a painting, by Sir Peter Lely at Goodwood, reproduced trow Lord March's "A Duke and his Friends." THE EARLY LOVES OF CHARLES II 25 for throwing him overboard, and that Clarendon did not think it beneath him to protest to Charles himself his innocence in the matter of Miss Stewart's marriage."* As for the new Duchess of Richmond, his Majesty's anger against her was by no means softened by the receipt of a bulky packet which, when opened, was found to contain all the presents of jewellery which he had given her ; and in a letter to his well-loved sister and confidante, Henrietta, Duchesse d'Orleans, he thus expresses his wounded feelings : " You may think me ill-natured, but if you consider how hard a thing 'tis to swallow an injury done by a person I had so much tendernesse for, you will in some degree excuse the resentment I use towards her : you know my good-nature enough to believe that I could not be so severe if I had not great provocation. I assure you her carriage towards me has been as bad as a breach of faith and friendship can make it, there- fore I hope you will pardon me if I cannot so soon forgett an injury which went so neere my heart." Charles, however, was too good-natured a man to harbour resentment for any length of time, besides which the Queen, who greatly preferred " La Belle Stuart " to any other of the royal favourites, seems to have acted as mediator, and in matters which did not run counter to his own inclinations the King was generally ready to oblige his consort. And so, towards the end of the year, overtures were made for the return of the Duchess of Richmond to Court. These at first led to nothing; nevertheless, the spring of 1668 saw the young lady once more upon the scene of her * " Life of Milton," vol. VI. 26 RIVAL SULTANAS former triumphs. In the interval she had had a bad attack of smallpox, which disfigured her seductive face, though not to any great extent, for the King, after his first visit to her, informs his sister Henrietta that " he must confesse that this last affliction made him pardon all that is past and that he cannot hinder himself from wishing her very well." If there were any truth in the reports that were going about, we can well believe that his Majesty's sentiments towards her were of the kindliest, for, towards the end of May, Pepys had it on the authority of the omniscient Mr. Pierce that the King was " mighty hot upon the Duchess of Richmond, insomuch that upon Sunday was se'nnight at night, after he had ordered his guards and coach to be ready to take him to the Park, he did on a sudden take a pair of oars or scullers, and all alone, or but one with him, go to Somerset House, and there, the garden door not being open, himself clamber over the walls to make a visit to her." Whether the wife was more complaisant than the maid had been is a question upon which historians have never been able to agree, but, if she were, it is certain that her husband was no party to her dishonour, since Charles deemed it advisable to send him out of the way, in 1670 to Scotland and in 1671 as Ambassador to Denmark. Here, at the end of the following year, he died, and, as he left no male issue, his titles reverted to Charles II. as his nearest collateral heir, who, as will presently be related, bestowed them upon his natural son by Louise de Keroualle. The widowed duchess, who soon after her return to Court had been appointed lady of the Bedchamber to THE EARLY LOVES OF CHARLES II 27 the Queen, had several suitors for her hand, but she did not marry again. She died on October 15, 1702, in the Roman Catholic communion, and was buried in Westminster Abbey, in the Duke of Richmond's vault in Henry VII.'s chapel. Of the numerous portraits of " La Belle Stuart " the best known are Lely's painting at Windsor ; another by Lely in the Duke of Richmond's collection, in which she appears as " Pallas," and the painting by Johnson at Kensington Palace. She also sat as model to John Roettiers for the figure of Britannia on our copper coins, and for the Peace of Breda medal (1667), where she is represented seated at the foot of a rock, with the legend, Favente Deo. She figured in a similar design on the Naval Victories' medal in 1667, and the same year a special medal was struck in her honour, with Britannia on the reverse. After the elopement of Frances Stuart with the Duke of Richmond, Lady Castlemaine's supremacy at Court seemed more assured than ever, insomuch that Louis XIV. directed his Ambassador, Colbert de Croissy, to lavish every possible attention on the favourite, in the hope of coaxing State secrets out of her. The Ambassador did not fail to follow these instructions, and paid the countess the most assiduous court ; but he very quickly perceived that she was too much dominated by the passion of the moment for any reliance to be placed on her support. At the end of August came the fall of Clarendon, an event to which the persistent hostility of Lady Castle- maine and her faction had largely contributed. She had 28 RIVAL SULTANAS openly expressed her desire to see the Minister's head on a charger, and when she heard that he was returning from his final audience of the King, she rushed out in her smock into her aviary overlooking Whitehall, " anxious to read in the saddened air of her distinguished enemy some presage of his fall," and bandied jests with the courtiers at the great statesman's expense. " The Chancellor's disgrace," says Pepys, " was certainly de- signed in my Lady Castlemayne's chamber ; and that when he went for the King on Monday morning she was in bed, though about twelve o'clock, and ran out in her smock into her aviary looking into Whitehall Garden ; and thither her woman brought her her night- gown [dressing-gown], and stood joying herself at the old man's going away ; and several of the gallants of Whitehall, of which there were many standing to see the Chancellor's return, did talk to her in her bird-cage, among others Blaneford [Louis de Duras, Marquis de Blanquefort], telling her she was the bird of Paradise." What a picture ! A rapacious courtesan gloating over the disgrace of the greatest statesman of his time — the man who had consolidated the Restoration — and that group of rakes and pimps and gamesters fawning upon her! But though her rival had left the Court for a time and her enemy for ever, Barbara Villiers's own domination was drawing to a close ; and the King, weary of her in- fidelities, her greed, and her ill-humour, was about to inflict upon her the mortification of having an actress as a competitor for his favours, before finding the en- chantress who was to lure him completely away. CHAPTER II THE BEGINNINGS OF NELL GWYN 'T^HE rallying-point of the great Anti-Puritan re- action which followed the Restoration was the theatre. Nor is this surprising when we consider how much the drama had suffered under Puritan rule and how well fitted it was to give expression to all the pleasures of life which the " saints " had striven to trample under foot. Since 1647, indeed, the theatres had been suppressed altogether, the players declared to be rogues, the exercise of their profession forbidden under the severest penalties, and persons found wit- nessing a stage-play punished by fines. Nevertheless, attempts were made by some of the bolder spirits of the persecuted profession to revive their old trade privately, and in the winter of 1648 a company formed out of the scattered members of several began with extreme caution to give performances at the Cockpit, in Drury Lane. They continued undisturbed for three or four days, when " a party of foot-soldiers beset the house, surprised them about the middle of the play, and carried 'em away in their habits, not admitting them to shift, to Hatton House, then a prison, where 29 3 o RIVAL SULTANAS they detained them some time, plundered them of their clothes, and let them loose again." * When Cromwell became Protector, there was a slight relaxation of the persecution. At Christmas and at Battledore Fair, the players used to bribe the officers who commanded the Guard at Whitehall, and were, in consequence, enabled to act for a few days at the Red Bull,f but were sometimes, notwithstanding, disturbed by soldiers ; while private performances were not infrequently given at different noblemen's houses, and in particular at Holland House, at Kensington, " where the nobility and gentry who met (but in no great numbers) used to make a sum for them, each giving a broad piece or the like." X In 1656 the rigours of fanaticism were so far relaxed that Sir William Davenant's play, The Cruelty of the Spaniards, was performed at the Cockpit ; but this concession was probably due to Cromwell's desire to place that nation before the people in an odious light and increase the popularity of the war with Spain. As soon as Monk at the head of his army declared for the King, the actors who had survived the hard times emerged from their hiding-places, and were organized into a company by Rhodes, formerly prompter at the Blackfriars Theatre, under whom they performed at the Red Bull. Rhodes afterwards performed at the Cockpit and at Salisbury Court, but before this the best of the players had gone over to Thomas Killigrew. At the Restoration, the drama, freed from the fetters * Historia Histrionica (London, 1699). f The site of the Red Bull is now covered by Woodbridge Street. X Historia Histrionica (London, 1699). THE BEGINNINGS OF NELL GWYN 31 which had so closely confined it for over fifteen years, found itself in the enjoyment of a prosperity infinitely greater than it had ever before known, for both Charles II. and his brother were enthusiastic playgoers, and all classes flocked to the theatre with appetites sharpened by their long abstinence. The old theatres were now reopened, and with every advantage which stage properties, new and improved scenery and the costliest dresses could lend to help them forward, and in London great interest was used for the erection of new playhouses. But the King, acting, it is believed, on the advice of Clarendon, who desired to do all in his power to stem the rising flood of gaiety and dissipa- tion, would not allow of more than two — the King's Theatre and the Duke's Theatre (so called in compli- ment to James, Duke of York). The patent for the first was given to Thomas Killigrew, one of the grooms of the Chambers, and a dramatist himself ; the second was placed under the direction of Sir William Davenant, Poet Laureate to Charles II., as he had been to the late King, and a successful writer for the stage, while Ben Jonson and Massinger were still alive. Davenant erected his theatre in Portugal Row, on the south side of Lincoln's Inn Fields, and his company began acting there in June, 1661. Killigrew selected the site of a riding-school in Drury Lane, almost exactly on the spot on which the present theatre now stands. The ground-rent of the riding- yard was .£50 a year, and the cost of erecting the theatre £1,500. It was a small house, with but few pretensions to architectural beauty, the dimensions of the building being 112 feet from east to west and 59 feet from north 32 RIVAL SULTANAS to south. The stage was lighted with wax candles, on brass censers or cressets. The pit lay open to the weather for the sake of light, but was subsequently covered in with a glazed cupola, which, however, only imperfectly protected the audience, so that in stormy weather the house was thrown into disorder, and the people in the pit were fain to rise. The theatre, the chief entrance of which was in Little Russell Street, not as now in Brydges Street, was first opened on April 8, 1663, with a representation of Beaumont and Fletcher's play The Humourous Lieutenant* The performances at both houses began at three, and the prices were : boxes four shillings, pit two and six- pence, middle gallery eighteen pence, upper gallery one shilling. Ladies in the pit wore vizards or masks, and this custom appears to have continued until the beginning of the reign of George I., when the practice was no longer permitted, the mask being regarded as the mark of a courtesan. The middle gallery, we learn from Pepys, was long the favourite resort of the diarist and his wife. The upper gallery was attended by the poorest and the noisiest, as is the case in modern theatres. Servants in livery were admitted free as soon as the fifth act began. An innovation of a highly important character dis- tinguished the playhouses of the Restoration from those which had preceded the Great Rebellion. This was the appearance of women upon the stage. f * The hour when the play began grew later with the dinner-hour. Thus in Shakespeare's time they began at one, while in Congreve's the curtain did not rise until four o'clock. f Mr. Cecil Chesterton, in his charming monograph on Nell Gwyn, speaks of THE BEGINNINGS OF NELL GWYN 33 From the earliest epoch of the Stage in England until the theatres were silenced at the outbreak of the Civil War, female characters had invariably been played by men. In 1629 a company of French actors, in which women were included, had appeared at the Blackfriars and afterwards at the Red Bull and the Fortune. But very great hostility appears to have been manifested against them, and it was only after the Restoration that the new system became acclimatized here. " Whereas," runs Davenant's patent for the Duke's Theatre, " the women's parts in plays have hitherto been acted by men, at which some have taken offence, we do give leave that for the time to come all women's parts be acted by women." Nevertheless, for several years after this boys and young men con- tinued to share the heroines of tragedy and comedy with the actresses, and appear, in some instances, to have more than held their own with the opposite sex in the estimation of the public. Thus, on January 3, 1667, Pepys notes that he saw Ben Jonson's Silent Woman with " Kineston the boy " as Epiccene ; and records his impression that, in female attire, he was " the prettiest woman in the whole house, and as a man, likewise did appear the handsomest man in the house." two important changes ; the other being the introduction of scenery. This is a common error. It is true that in the Historia Histrionica, published in 1699, it is distinctly stated that scenery was first introduced upon the stage by Dave- nant at the Duke's Theatre in 1663. But, as Mr. Baker has pointed out in his interesting " History of the London Stage," we know that Ben Jonson and Shirley's masques were illustrated by Inigo Jones in a way that would tax the powers of even a modern artist ; while " the Elizabethan drama abounds in stage directions, which, if every kind of scenic effect were unknown, are perfectly meaningless." 3 34 RIVAL SULTANAS At both the King's and the Duke's Theatres there was a perfect galaxy of histrionic talent. At the former house the leading actors were Charles Hart and Michael Mohun, both of whom had fought in the royal cause during the Civil War. Mohun was famous in the roles of Iago and Cassius ; while Hart, who was the grand- nephew of Shakespeare, rose to the very summit of his profession. In the days of Charles I. he had acted women's parts at the Blackfriars Theatre with con- spicuous success, and he was now even more successful in the presentation of masculine characters. He was the best Othello that had yet been seen, and so dignified and impressive was his acting in the part of Alexander that one of the courtiers declared that " Hart might teach any king on earth how to comport himself."* Then there was John Lacy, famous as a comedian ; William Cartwright, who won great renown as Fal- staff, and as one of the two Kings of Brentford in the farce of the Rehearsal ; Wintershall, celebrated for his Cokes in Ben Jonson's Bartholomew Fair, and Kynaston, who continued to shine in female parts long after the introduction of women to the stage. Among the actresses of the troupe were Mrs. Corey, the original Widow Blackacre in Wycherley's Plain Dealer ; Rebecca, or " Beck " Marshall, reported, though incorrectly, to be the daughter of the great Presbyterian divine of that name, who preached the sermon at the funeral of John Pym ; Mrs. Weaver, one of the several actresses " spoiled " by Charles II. ; Peg Hughes, who soothed the old age of Prince Rupert and had a daughter by him called Ruperta, and Mrs. Uphill, first the mistress * Roscius Anglicantis. THE BEGINNINGS OF NELL GWYN 35 and afterwards the wife of Sir Robert Howard, the poet, and Mrs. Knipp,* so admired of Mr. Samuel Pepys. Foremost of the actors at the Duke's Theatre stood the celebrated Thomas Betterton, one of the greatest who ever trod the boards of an English theatre. He was soon to overshadow all his colleagues, notwith- standing that the company contained some excellent representatives of both the tragic and the comic art. Among them may be mentioned Joseph Harris, originally a seal-cutter, and famous in the parts of Romeo, Wolsey and Sir Andrew Aguecheek ; William Smith, a barrister of Gray's Inn, celebrated as Zanga in Lord Orrery's Mustapha ; James Nokes, originally a toyman in Corn- hill, famous for his bawling fops and his " good com- pany," and Cave Underhill, another finished comedian. The women were Mrs. Davenport, who created the part of Roxolana in Davenant's Siege of Rhodes and left the stage to become the mistress of Aubrey de Vere, the twentieth and last Earl of Oxford ; Mary Saunder- son, a famous Juliet, afterwards the wife of Betterton ; Mrs. Long, the mistress of the Duke of Richmond, celebrated for the elegance of her appearance in men's clothes ; Mary or Moll Davis, excellent in both singing and dancing, who enjoyed for a short time the favour • Cunningham says that Mrs. Knipp, who was the wife of a Smithfield horse- dealer, whom Pepys describes as " an ill, melancholy, jealous-looking fellow " suspected of ill-treating her, was the mistress of the diarist, but it is doubtful if their intimacy ever exceeded the bounds of flirtation. The worthy Samuel, we suspect, was more of a philanderer than a libertine, and he certainly stood very much in awe of Mrs. Pepys, as witness the following : " But that which troubled me most was that Knepp (sic) sent by Moll to desire to speak to me after the play, and she beckoned to me at the end of the play ; but it was so late that, for fear of my wife coming home before me, I was forced to go straight home, which troubled me." 3* 36 RIVAL SULTANAS of the King, and Mrs. Johnson, who likewise excelled as a dancer and was famous for her performance of the part of Carolina in Shadwell's comedy, Epsom Wells. The old stock plays were divided by the two companies. Thus, of Shakespeare's, Killigrew had Othello, Julius Caesar, Henry the Fourth, The Merry Wives of Windsor, and A Midsummer Night's Dream ; while Davenant had Hamlet, Lear, Macbeth, Romeo and Juliet, Henry the Eighth, Twelfth Night and The Tempest. When, however, we read that The Tempest was turned into an opera, and Romeo and Juliet given a happy ending, which was played on alternate nights with the tragic one, to cater for the palates of the less sentimental playgoers, it must be admitted that the masterpieces of the old dramatists were treated with a sad lack of respect. The fact is that the patrons of the Restoration theatre seem to have vastly preferred the modern drama to that of the past,* and certainly a period which produced not only a Dryden and a Wycherley, but such capable playwrights as Sir Robert Howard, Sir Charles Sedley, Davenant, Killigrew, Cowley, Etherege and Lord Orrery was a great one itself. Unhappily, its art re- flected only too clearly the licentious morals of the age, and was characterized by such studied indecencies that, at the performance of a new comedy, ladies seldom attended, or, if they did, came masked. The wits of Charles found easier way to fame, Nor wished for Jonson's art or Shakespeare's flame ; Themselves they studied — as they felt they writ — Intrigue was plot, obscenity was wit. * Pepys describes A Midsummer Night's Dream as ** the most insipid, ridicu- lous play that ever he saw in his life." THE BEGINNINGS OF NELL GWYN 37 In the pit, with their backs to the stage, stood the orange-girls, each with her basket of shining fruit on her arm. The price of oranges was very high, usually six- pence apiece,* and the same price appears to have been paid thirty years later. " Half-crown the play, sixpence my orange, cost " says one of the characters in Mrs. Behn's Young King, produced in 1698. It was considered beneath the dignity of a gentleman to haggle over the price, and it was the mode to offer the finest orange to the nearest masked lady. With " the pert damsels with their china-ware," f the gallants of the town were accustomed to bandy their jests, which, as may be imagined, were not always of the most delicate description, and they would appear to have been employed pretty frequently in carrying billets-doux to and fro between the pit and the wings. The mistress or superior of the girls, was familiarly known as Orange Moll, and was acquainted with all the gossip of the green-room. Pepys would occasionally have " a great deal of discourse with Orange Moll ; " and, as we have seen, the fascinating Mrs. Knipp, when she desired to speak to the Clerk of the Acts, sent Moll with the message. On Monday, April 3, 1665, the tragedy of Mustapka, the work of that noble playwright the Earl of Orrery, was being performed at the Duke's Theatre. Betterton • In France, however, the price of oranges would appear to have been much higher ; for the son in Moliere's VAvare speaks of purchasing China oranges for his mistress as though they were a costly delicacy. t D'Urfey, Preface to A Fool's Preferment, 1688. 38 RIVAL SULTANAS played the part of Solymon, his wife that of Roxolana, in place of Mrs. Davenport, whom the Earl of Oxford had taken from the stage, first to deceive by a mock marriage and afterwards to desert, Harris the title- part, and Moll Davis, whose bright eyes and pretty figure had already, it was whispered, begun to attract the attention of the King, that of the Queen of Hun- gary. Great care had been taken to produce this now long-forgotten tragedy with the utmost magnificence, and new scenery had been expressly painted for it. But, according to Pepys, who was among the audience, " all the pleasure of the play was that the King and Lady Castlemaine were present, and pretty, witty Nelly at [i. e. of] the King's House and the younger [Rebecca] Marshall sat next us, which pleased me mightilye" On December 8, 1666, the diarist visited the rival playhouse to witness a performance of The English Monsieur, by the Hon. Robert Howard, a son of the Earl of Berkshire, Dryden's brother-in-law, and writes as follows : " Myself to the King's playhouse, which troubles me, since it hath cost me a forfeit of ten shillings, which I have paid, and there did see a good part of The English Monsieur, which is a mighty pretty play, very witty and pleasant. And the women do very well, and above all little Nelly." Some weeks later, Pepys attended the Drury Lane playhouse on the occasion of a performance of The Humourous Lieutenant of Beaumont and Fletcher, which he stigmatizes as " a silly play," though he admits that Mrs. Knipp's singing pleased him. He appears, however, to have found abundant consolation for his THE BEGINNINGS OF NELL GWYN 39 disappointment when the curtain fell, for Mrs. Knipp took him and his friends behind the scenes and " brought us to Nelly, a most pretty woman, who acted the great part of Coelia to-day very fine. I kissed her, and so did my wife ; and a mighty pretty soul she is. We also saw Mrs. Hall, which is my little Roman-nosed black girl, that is mighty pretty : she is usually called Betty.* Knipp made us stay in a box and see the dancing preparatory to to-morrow for The Goblins, a play of Suckling, not acted these twenty-five years ;f which was pretty ; and so away, pleased with this sight also, and specially kissing of Nelly." The Nelly mentioned in the above passages, to kiss whom gave the writer so much pleasure that, as an historian has aptly remarked, it was certainly just as well that Mrs. Pepys was present on this occasion, was Nell Gwyn, one of the few queens of the left hand who not only enjoyed a great popularity during her lifetime, but for whom posterity has always preserved a warm corner in its heart. According to a horoscope of her, which has been assigned to Lilly, and is preserved among the Ashmole papers in the Museum at Oxford, Nell Gwyn was born on February 2, 1 650-1 ; but the place of her birth is uncertain. Cunningham says that, when he was at Oxford, a certain Dr. John Ireland, an antiquary, assured him that she was born in the university town, and even named the parish, but there does not appear to be any support for this story, beyond the fact that two of the titles of her son, the Duke of St. Albans — * She was the mistress of Sir Robert Howard. t Suckling's play was first played in 1646 at the Blackfriars Theatre. 4 o RIVAL SULTANAS Headington and Burford — were taken from Oxford localities. Another tradition ascribes it to the Cole- Yard in Drury Lane, a low alley situated on the east or City side of the Lane near the Holborn end. " The life of Nelly truly shown From Cole-yard or Celler to the throne," wrote Sir George Etherege in his Lady of Pleasure, a bitter satire on Nell. But, since Nell undoubtedly passed her early years in Drury Lane, there is an obvious reason why her birth should be associated with it, and none appear to have urged the claims of the Cole- Yard with any force. A third tradition makes Hereford her birthplace, and the inhabitants of the capital of the cider county seem anxious to claim her as their own. Thus the name of the street in which stood the house where she is supposed to have been born was towards the end of the last century changed fromPipewell Lane to Gwyn Street, and in 1883 the then Bishop of Hereford gave his consent to the fixing of a memorial tablet to Nell Gwyn on the outer face of his garden, to mark the site of this house, which had been pulled down in 1859. The preponderance of modern opinion may be said to be in favour of Hereford — the birthplace, by the way, of the greatest of English actors, David Garrick — but that is not saying much, as there is little or no evidence either way. The same uncertainty applies to Nell's paternity. When she had become prosperous, some subservient person found her a coat-of-arms, and her father is said to have been one Captain Thomas Gwyn, " of an ancient family in Wales." The name Gwyn is certainly of THE BEGINNINGS OF NELL GWYN 41 Welsh origin, and, since Hereford is so near to Wales, this is an argument in favour of the tradition that she was born in that city. But, from the sordid circum- stances of her early life, it seems much more probable that her father was a man of humble origin.* In a catchpenny " Life of Eleanor Gwinn," published in 1752, she is said to have been the daughter of a tradesman in mean circumstances. Of Nell's mother more is known. She lived for a while with her daughter in Pall Mall, but at the time of her death, in 1679, she was living at the Neat Houses at Chelsea. Here she fell into the water and was drowned, and ill-natured persons declared that she was intoxicated at the time. " Dy'd drunk with brandy on a common-shore " wrote Etherege in the satire referred to ; while a black- bordered broadside was circulated entitled, " An Elegy upon that never-to-be-forgotten Matron, Old Maddam Gwinn, who was unfortunately drowned in her own Fish- pond on the 29th of July, 1679." Mrs. Gwyn's Chris- tian name was Helena, but her maiden name is unknown. A monument to her memory, erected by her daughter in the south aisle of the old church of St. Martin's-in- the-Fields, states that she was born in that parish,! and this is, to some extent, a reason for supposing that Nell Gwyn was also born in London. • Mr. H. B. Wheatley, Introduction to Cunningham's " Story of Nell Gwyn " (edit. 1903). f The inscription on the monument was as follows : " Here lies interred the body of Helena Gwyn, born in this parish, who departed this life y e 20th of July MDCLXXIX, in the lvi yeare of her age." When the church was rebuilt, the monument disappeared. 42 RIVAL SULTANAS The only other near relation known to us is her sister Rose Gwyn, whose name is mentioned in a sedan chair- man's bill, found among Nell's papers after her death, and in the codicil to her will. She married a Captain John Cassells, a man, it is said, of some fortune, who spent it in the service of the Crown and died in 1675, leaving her penniless. Charles II. gave her a pension of ^200 a year, which she continued to receive until the accession of William and Mary. Some time before 1687 she married a Mr. Forster, and is mentioned in her sister's will as " Mrs. Rose Forster." Some persons have supposed that she was identical with a certain Rose Gwyn who was arrested for theft in 1663, and sent to Newgate, but subsequently released, because " her father had lost all in the royal cause." But of this there is no confirma- tory evidence, and it should be remembered that the name Gwyn is by no means an uncommon one, and that there are many instances of persons bearing it who were in no way related to Nell Gwyn. Nothing is known with certainty as to Nell Gwyn's early years, except that they were passed amid squalid, and even worse, surroundings. She lived in the Cole- Yard with her mother, and we can imagine her spending a good part of her time in playing about the courts and alleys of the vicinity, with other dirty and scantily- clothed, but merry and light-hearted, children. Those years left a mark upon her which was never to be effaced, and whether as popular actress or King's mistress, Nell Gwyn, with her animal spirits, her quickness of repartee, her vulgarity, her good-nature, and her sublime dis- regard of the conventionalities, was always at heart the gamin of Drury Lane. NELL r.i by Wright, aiter nting by Sir Peter Lely. THE BEGINNINGS OF NELL GWYN 43 What was the next phase in Nell's life — and it was indeed a horrible one — we learn from a passage in Pepys : " Mr. Pierce tells me," he writes, " that the two Marshalls at the King's House are Stephen Marshall's, the great Presbyter's daughters ; * and that Nelly and Beck Marshall falling out the other day, the latter called the other my Lord Buckhurst's mistress. Nell answered her : ' I was but one man's mistress, though I was brought up in a brothel to fill strong waters to the gentlemen ; and you are a mistress to three or four, though a praying Presbyter's daughter.' " The house referred to by Nell is believed to have been one kept by an infamous woman named Ross, and to have been situated in Leuknor Lane, the next turning in Drury Lane to the Cole-Yard. It was this woman's practice to entrap young girls, whom she trained for her foul purposes ; but, until they were old enough to submit to their final degradation, they were sent dressed as orange-girls to sell fruit at the adjoining theatres. " But first the basket her fair arm did suit Laden with pippins and Hesperian fruit ; This first step raised, to the wondering pit she sold The loveh/ fruit smiling with streaks of gold." -j* It was in the pit at the King's Theatre that Nell plied her trade, and we can well believe that her appearance excited the wonder of which the poet speaks. She was now apparently in her fifteenth year, small but ex- quisitely graceful, with reddish-brown hair, sparkling blue eyes, which, when she laughed, became almost * This, as we have mentioned elsewhere, is incorrect, t Earl of Rochester, A Panegyrick on Nelly. 44 RIVAL SULTANAS invisible, very white teeth, and tiny but perfectly shaped feet. The girl's unusual attractions saved her from the terrible fate which might otherwise have awaited her. Oldys, in the account of her life which he wrote for Curll's History of the English Stage, states that a certain Robert Duncan, whom he believes to have been a mer- chant, took a fancy to her from her smart wit, fine shape, and the smallness of her feet, and introduced her to the stage. This is confirmed by Etherege in his satire, The Lady of Pleasure, who adds that in after years, Nell used her influence to obtain for Duncan a commission in the Guards. In the opinion of Cunningham, the name of this patron of Nell was not Duncan, but Dongan, and he was identical with a Dongan mentioned by Anthony Hamilton in his Memoires of Gramont as having succeeded Duras, afterwards Earl of Feversham, in the post of lieutenant in the Duke's Life Guards. He adds that he had ascertained from official documents that there was a Robert Dungan, a lieutenant in the Duke's Life Guards, who died in or before 1669. Whatever truth there may be in this story, and whether or no the mysterious Duncan or Dungan was Nell's lover, as some have supposed, it is certain that the girl received her training for the profession in which she was soon to occupy so prominent a place from the actor Charles Hart, with perhaps some assistance from his colleague, John Lacy, the leading comedian of the King's Theatre. Mr. Cecil Chesterton, who persists in seeing every- thing connected with Nell through rose-coloured spectacles, is very angry with Rochester and Etherege, THE BEGINNINGS OF NELL GWYN 45 who assert that Hart exacted a price for his assistance, and declares that " there is absolutely no shadow of evidence to support such a charge." But Rochester and Etherege were not alone in making it ; and, as Nell herself on one occasion was heard to call Charles II. her Charles the third — meaning that her first lover was Charles Hart, her second Charles Sackville, Lord Buck- hurst, and afterwards Earl of Dorset, of whom we shall speak presently, and her third Charles Stuart — there would not appear to be very much doubt about the matter. CHAPTER III NELL GWYN AND LORD BUCKHURST 'TpHERE can be little doubt that Nell Gwyn was a born comedienne, and a comedienne whose quali- ties were peculiarly suited to the lively, witty, and de- cidedly " broad " comedy of the Restoration. In tragedy, on the other hand, for which she was quite unfitted, she appears to have been a dismal failure, and Pepys, so enthusiastic an admirer of her farcical impersonations, condemns her performance of tragic parts in unmeasured terms. Thus, when on August 22, 1667, he saw her in the part of Cydaria, Montezuma's daughter, in Dryden's Indian Emperor, he expressed his opinion that it was quite unsuitable for her, and that she did it " most basely." Neither was he any better pleased when he saw her again in this character some weeks later (November 11, 1667), since he informs us that "Nell's ill-speaking of a great part made him mad," nor yet with her acting as Samira in Robert Howard's Surprisal, on December 26, a part which, he says, she spoiled. Nell herself was fully conscious of her own limitations, and several of the epilogues written for her by Dryden 46 NELL GWYN AND LORD BUCKHURST 47 and others, in the delivery of which she probably sur- passed any other actress of her time, expressed her dislike of " serious parts." " I know you in your hearts Hate serious plays — as I hate serious parts," she says in the epilogue to that very dull play The Duke of Lerma, which Pepys assures us she spoke " most excellently." And again, in the epilogue to Dryden's Tyrannick Love : " I die Out of my calling in a tragedy." Nell's first appearance on the stage took place in 1665, in the very part in Dryden's Indian Emperor in which her acting so disgusted the critical Mr. Pepys when he saw her two years later. But we have no record of what parts she undertook in the interval between this and her appearance in James Howard's English Monsieur at the end of the following year, to which reference has already been made. The part which she took, that of Lady Wealthy, a rich widow, with a good heart and a rich vein of humour, was one peculiarly adapted to her talents, and had in all probability been expressly written for her ; and she no doubt well deserved the praise bestowed upon her by Pepys. At the beginning of 1666-j, Nell, as we have seen, scored another success as Celia in The Humourous Lieu- tenant of Beaumont and Fletcher, a play that was long a favourite with the public, and was frequently acted throughout the reign of Charles II. But her greatest triumph was achieved a fortnight later, in the part of Florimel in Dryden's tragi-comedy of Secret Love, or 48 RIVAL SULTANAS The Maiden Queen. The plot of this admirable play, which is generally considered the best which Dryden ever wrote, had been suggested to the author by the King, who called it " his play." The dramatis persona con- sisted, singularly enough, of eight female and only three male parts, that of Celadon being played by Hart. The play was produced on February 2, 1666-j, before a crowded and distinguished audience, which included the King and the Duke of York — and Mr. and Mrs. Pepys, and met with a very cordial reception, for not only had the author surpassed himself, but he was most fortunate in his interpreters, all the parts being admir- ably acted. Particularly excellent were Hart, in the character of Celadon, and Nell, in that of Florimel. The latter, indeed, had to sustain the chief burden of the piece, and was seldom off the stage, while in the fifth act she appeared in boy's clothes, and danced a jig to the great delight of the audience. The enthusiasm of Pepys at Nell's acting knew no bounds. " The truth is," he says, " there is a comical part done by Nell, which is Florimel, that I never can hope to see the like done again by man or woman. ... So great performance of a comical part was never, I believe, in the world before as Nell did this, both as a mad girl, then most and best of all when she comes in as a young gallant, and hath the motion and carriage of a spark the most that ever I saw any man have. It makes me, I confess, admire her." Nor, though he witnessed the play on two subsequent occasions, did the Clerk of the Acts find cause to modify this opinion. He calls it, after his second visit on March 25, an " excellent play, and so done by Nell her merry part as cannot be better done in nature ; " while after NELL GWYN AND LORD BUCKHURST 49 his third visit, two months later, he declares that " it is impossible to have Florimel's part, which is the most comical that ever was made, ever done better than it is by Nelly." Nell's success upon the stage had by this time raised her far above the degrading surroundings of her early years. She still lived in Drury Lane, but it was at the fashionable — the Strand end — of that thoroughfare, where stood the town residences of the Earl of Anglesey, long Lord Privy Seal, and the Earls of Clare and Craven, after whom Clare Market and Craven Yard were named. The house in which she lodged, which was pulled down in 1 891, but has since been rebuilt, stood opposite the gate of Craven House, at the top of Maypole Alley ; and from it could be seen the great Maypole in the Strand, surmounted by a crown and vane with the royal arms richly gilded, which, after being hewn down by the Puritans, had been set up again immediately after the Restoration, amid great rejoicings. Here it was that Pepys saw her on May Day, 1667, and the sight seems to have left a very pleasant impression on his mind. " Thence to Westminster," he writes, " in the way, meeting many milkmaids, with their garlands upon their pails, dancing with a fiddler before them, and saw pretty Nelly standing at her lodgings' door in Drury Lane, in her smock sleeves and bodice, looking upon them. She seemed a mighty pretty creature." A mighty pretty creature she seemed to a good many other persons beside the Clerk of the Acts, as will be gathered from another passage from the same writer : " Thence called Knepp from the King's House, 4 So RIVAL SULTANAS where, going in for her, the play being done, I saw Beck Marshall come dressed off the stage and look mighty fine and pretty and noble ; and also Nell in her boy's clothes, mighty pretty. But Lord ! their con- fidence, and how many men do hover about them as soon as they come off the stage, and how confident they are in their talk ! " * Men have hovered about actresses at all times, some- times with honourable or at least innocent, but far more often, we fear, with other, intentions ; but there could be no possible doubt as to the intentions of the gentlemen of whom Pepys speaks. For the women of the playhouses of the Restoration were regarded as ladies of very easy virtue indeed, and ready enough to pick up. any handkerchief that might be thrown to them, provided the owner, either on account of rank or wealth or good looks, happened to find favour in their sight. One has only to turn to the prologues or epilogues of the plays of that period to find that the excessive sensibility of the actress was a common topic with the dramatist, who bewails it, not so much on moral grounds, as because it tended to make them proud and insolent, and despise their calling, and sometimes to deprive the stage of their services altogether. Davenant, foreseeing these inconveniences, boarded his four principal actresses in his own house, but, with the single exception of Mary Saunderson, who became the wife of Betterton, the precaution proved altogether ineffective. Such being the moral atmosphere of the theatre, it was only to be expected that Nell should sooner or later surrender to the importunities of one of her • May 7, 1668. NELL GWYN AND LORD BUCKHURST 51 numerous admirers ; but it certainly says something for the good taste of the ex-orange-girl that the favoured lover should have been regarded as the best-bred man of his age. " Mr Pierce tells us," writes Pepys, " under date July 13, 1667, that my Lord Buckhurst hath got Nell away from the King's House, lives with her, and gives her {100 a year, so as she hath sent her parts to the house, and will act no more." Among the reckless, witty, profligate courtiers of the Restoration, no figure is more interesting than that of Charles Sackville, Lord Buckhurst, afterwards the magnificent Earl of Dorset. The eldest son of Richard Sackville, fifth Earl of Dorset, and Frances, daughter of Lionel Cranfield, fifth Earl of Middlesex, he was born on January 24, 1637-8, and was therefore at this time in his thirty-first year. Probably, owing to the confusion of the times, he was not sent to either Uni- versity, but educated under private tutors, and spent some time in Italy. Returning to England at the Restoration, he was elected to the House of Commons, as member for East Grinstead ; " but," says his profound admirer, the courtly Prior, " turned his parts rather to books and conversation than to politics." In other words, he became a courtier, a wit, and a profligate, and for some years seems to have led a very dissipated life. In February, 1662-3, he and his brother Edward and three other gentlemen were arrested on a charge of robbing and killing a tanner named Hoppy, near Newington, and lodged in Newgate. Their defence was that they mistook Hoppy for a highwayman whom they were pursuing, and the money which they found 4* 52 RIVAL SULTANAS upon him for stolen property ; and the prosecution was dropped. In the following year, he was mixed up with Sir Charles Sedley, the poet, author of that charming lyric, " Phillis is my only joy," but in his youthful days the most abandoned rake about town, in a dis- graceful drunken frolic at the notorious Cock Tavern, in Bow Street, kept by a woman called Oxford Kate. For this escapade, Pepys tells us, Sedley received " a most high reproof" from the Lord Chief Justice, who informed him that " it was for him and such wicked wretches as he was that God's anger and judgments hung over them ; " and his lordship also animadverted very severely on the conduct of Lord Buckhurst, re- marking that " it would have more become him to have been at his prayers, begging God's forgiveness [for the death of the tanner Hoppy] than now running into such courses again." According to Pepys, Sedley was bound over in the sum of .£5,000.* Buckhurst found better employment for his energies shortly afterwards by volunteering for the fleet fitted out against the Dutch and taking an honourable part • Dr. Johnson, in the biography of Charles Sackville in his " Lives of the Poets," gives the following account of this affair : " Sackville, who was then Lord Buckhurst, with Sir Charles Sedley and Sir Thomas Ogle, got drunk at the Cock, in Bow Street, by Covent Garden, and going into the balcony, exposed themselves to the populace in very indecent postures. At last, as they grew warmer, Sedley stood forth naked, and harangued the populace in such profane language that the public indignation was awakened ; the crowd attempted to force the door, drove in the performers with stones, and broke the windows of the house. For this misdemeanour they were indicted, and Sedley was fined five hundred pounds ; what was the sentence of the others is not known. Sedley employed [Henry] Killigrew and another to procure a remission from the King, but [mark the friendship of the dissolute !] they begged the fine for themselves and exacted it to the last groat." ;harles sackville, earl of Dorset (Lord Buckhurst) From an engraving alter S. Harding NELL GWYN AND LORD BUCKHURST 53 in the great naval battle of June 3rd, 1663. On this occasion he composed his famous song, " To all you ladies now at land," an admitted masterpiece of its kind.* On his return, he resumed his dissolute course of life, and in 1668 we find Pepys classing him with Sedley as a pattern rake, " running up and down all night, almost naked, through the streets ; and at last fighting and being beat by the watch and clapped up all night." Yet, rake and madcap though he was, Buckhurst possessed great qualities. He had a genuine love of literature, and not only wrote verses of undeniable merit, " the effusions of a man of wit, gay, vigorous, and airy,"f as Dr. Johnson describes them, and some of the severest and most refined satires we possess, but was the friend of all the poets of eminence of his time, as he was afterwards, when he succeeded to his father's title and estates, the most munificent patron of men of genius that this country has seen. He be- friended Dryden, Butler, Wycherley and many others ; he was consulted, if we may believe Prior, by Waller for verse, by Sprat for prose, and by Charles II., whose favour he retained throughout the whole of that monarch's life, touching the portraits of Sir Peter Lely. He was " the best good-hearted man," who kept open house for his friends — and surely no man ever had so many friends ! — and a table furnished with an abundance which has seldom been surpassed, and at which a freedom reigned which made every one of his • Prior states that Buckhurst actually wrote these verses on the night before the battle, b> t, according to Lord Orrery, he only retouched them. t Dr. Johnson, " Lives of the Poet*." 54 RIVAL SULTANAS guests imagine himself at home. Little wonder then that he should have had a Pope to write his epitaph and a Prior his panegyric, or that the cool judgment of historians should have echoed the admiration of his contemporaries ! " He was," writes Horace Walpole, " the finest gentleman of the voluptuous court of Charles II. He had as much wit as his master or his contemporaries, Buckingham and Rochester, without the royal want of feeling, the duke's want of principle, or the earl's want of thought."* It was to Epsom that Buckhurst had carried off his mistress. The Surrey town was, of course, not yet the scene of those races which have since made it famous, but, as a health resort, it was at this period, and until nearly half a century later, only inferior in reputation to Tunbridge Wells. The waters, to the medicinal properties of which, real or imaginary,! tne place was indebted for its prosperity, appear to have enjoyed a local celebrity so far back as the latter years of Queen Elizabeth ; but by the middle of the seventeenth century their fame had spread far and wide, so that persons are said to have come from the Continent to drink them ; while in the time of Charles II. it was a common occurrence for doctors to advise a visit to Epsom. Thus, in the Domestic State Papers, under date June 29, 1668, we read : " Chatham Dockyard. John Owen to Pepys. " I beg leave of absence for 12 days, being afflicted with . . . and advised to drink • " Noble Authors." f Lord Rosebery, in his interesting introduction to Mr. Gordon Home's work, " Epsom : its history and surroundings," expresses the opinion that visitors were cured of their ailments " at least as much by air, abstinence, exercise, and a healing faith " as by the virtues of the waters. NELL GWYN AND LORD BUCKHURST 55 Epsom waters ; " while in the following August one Ph. Pett writes from Chatham to the Navy Commis- sioners : " I beg leave for a fortnight, through ill- health, being advised by my physician to drink Epsom waters."* But Epsom, although royalty occasionally honoured it by its presence, and there was generally a sprinkling of courtiers among the visitors, was never a fashionable resort in the sense that Tunbridge Wells was at this time or Bath at a later date. It was the resort rather of the richer citizens of London than of the aristocracy, and the haberdashers and comfit-makers of ShadwelPs comedy of Epsom Wells were much more in evidence there than their customers who dwelt west of Temple Bar. At Epsom the lovers installed themselves in a house adjoining the King's Head Inn,f with Buckhurst's boon companion, Sedley, to bear them company and help them make game of the pursy " cits " and their wives as they passed by on their way to the wells. " To the King's Head [Epsom]," writes Pepys, under date July 14, " where our coachman carried us, and there had an • Cited by Mr. Gordon Home, " Epsom : its history and surroundings." f Mr. Gordon Home's book contains an interesting note on this house : " This house next door to the King's Head, where Nelly stayed, is still standing, the ground floor being utilised as a grocer's shop. Unfortunately, the interior has been altered too much to leave anything suggestive of that time, and one is forced to be content with knowing that the Court favourite occupied two little bay-windowed rooms overlooking the street, one of them being used as a bed- room and the other as a sitting-room. During a comparatively recent altera- tion, a very small doorway was discovered in one of the walls of the left-hand room as one faces the building. This might have been used as a secret entrance or exit ; but it is entirely covered up with plaster and wall-paper now, so that it it impossible to examine it without having the wall pulled to pieces." 56 RIVAL SULTANAS ill room for us to go into, but the best in the house that was not taken up. Here we called for drink and bespoke dinner, and heard that my lord Buckhurst and Nelly are lodged at the next house, and Sir Charles Sidly [Sedley] with them, and keep a merry house. Poor girl ! I pity her, but more the loss of her at the King's House." These three lively sparks did not keep merry house long at Epsom, though, while they did, we can well believe that it must have been a very merry house indeed, with something doubtless much more sustaining than the beverage for which the town was then famed flowing pretty freely to assist the flow of wit of perhaps the wittiest woman and two of the wittiest men of their time. For the love-affair of Buckhurst and Nell was but a midsummer madness ; by August his fickle lordship had already had enough of his new inamorata, and before the end of the month Nell was back at the King's Theatre, playing some of her old parts. Pepys was somewhat pre- mature in deploring the fact that she was lost to the stage. " To the King's playhouse," writes our diarist on August 26, " and saw The Surprisal, a very mean play, I thought ; or else it was because I was out of humour ; and but very little company in the house. Sir W. Pen and I had a great deal of discourse with [Orange] Moll, she tells us that Nell is already left by my Lord Buckhurst, and that he makes sport of her, and swears that she hath had all she could get of him ; and Hart, her great admirer, now hates her ; and that she is very poor, and hath lost my Lady Castlemaine, who was her NELL GWYN AND LORD BUCKHURST 57 great friend also ; but she is come to the house, but is neglected by them all." Poor Nell's life at this period would not appear to have been a very happy one. Her conquest of so desirable an admirer as my Lord Buckhurst must have caused a good many heartburnings in the green-room, and its abrupt termination would afford her jealous colleagues too tempting an opportunity for venting their spleen to be neglected. But what the girl, proud as she was of the success she had so early achieved in her profession, must have found even harder to bear than the spiteful remarks that were aimed at her — for her powers of repartee would enable her to give a good deal more than she took in a battle of tongues — was the fact that Hart, indignant at her leaving the theatre, or himself, or both, took the mean revenge of thrusting upon her those serious parts for which, as he very well knew, she was quite unsuited, and in which she so dis- gusted the critical Mr. Pepys. Fortunately, however, Hart, in the interests of the theatre, could not continue this for long, v and, after a few weeks, Nell resumed her comedy roles and speedily recovered her former popularity. Under date October 5, Pepys gives us another little miniature portrait of Nell and of life behind the scenes of the King's Theatre : " To the King's House and there going in met with Knipp and she took us into the tireing rooms ; and to the women's shift, where Nell was dressing herself,* and was all unready, and is very pretty, prettier than I thought. And so walked all up and down the house * As Flora, in Flora's Vagaries, a comedy attributed to Rhodes. 58 RIVAL SULTANAS and then below into the scene-room, and there sat down, and she gave us fruit ; and here I read the questions to Knipp, while she answered me through all the part of Flora's Figgarys (sic), which was acted to-day. But, Lord ! to see how they were both painted would make a man mad, and did make me loath them ; and what base company of men comes among them, and how loudly they talk ! and how poor the men are in clothes, and yet what a show they make on the stage by candle- light, is very observable. But to see how Nell cursed for having so few people in the pit was pretty ; the other house carrying away all the people, and is said now-a-days to have generally most company, as being the better players.'' The attraction at " The Duke's " which was drawing people away from the other house and causing Nell to use such forcible language was the singing and dancing of little Miss Davis in a piece called The Rivals, a new version by Davenant of The Two Noble Kinsmen, of Beaumont and Fletcher, or rather of Fletcher alone. It had been produced in 1664, but would not appear to have met with any great success until the author conceived the idea of giving the part of Celania, " a shepherdess mad for love," to Moll Davis, who danced a jig and sang a song, both of which found their way direct to the susceptible heart of the Merry Monarch, in which there was at that moment a vacant corner, caused by the departure of the beautiful and discreet Frances Stuart, who, to escape the royal importunities, had fled from the Court and married the Duke of Rich- mond. The jig, according to Cunningham, was probably some French importation, or nothing more than a rustic MISS DAVIS From an engraving after Harding. NELL GWYN AND LORD BUCKHURST 59 measure with a few foreign innovations ; but the song, which has much ballad beauty to recommend it, has come down to us. My lodging is on the cold ground, And very hard is my fare, But that which troubles me most is The unkindness of my dear. Yet still I cry, O turn, love, And I prythee, love, turn to me, For thou art the man that I long for, And alack, what remedy ! I'll crown thee with a garland of straw, then, And I'll marry thee with a rush ring ; My frozen hopes shall thaw then, And merrily we will sing. O turn to me, my dear love, And I prythee, love, turn to me, For thou art the man that alone canst Procure my liberty. But if thou wilt harden thy heart still And be deaf to my pitiful moan, Then I must endure the smart still And tumble in straw alone. Yet still I cry, O turn, love, And I prythee, love, turn to me, For thou art the man that alone art The cause of my misery. The King was so much touched by the woes of the lovelorn Celania that he shortly afterwards persuaded her to exchange her lodging on the cold ground for a luxuriously-furnished house in Suffolk Street, Pall Mall, and " married " her, not with a rush-ring, but with one which is said to have cost £joo, and which the little lady lost no opportunity of displaying to the eyes of her admiring and envious friends. Moll Davis is believed to have had good blood in her 60 RIVAL SULTANAS veins, since Colonel Charles Howard, afterwards second Earl of Berkshire, is said to have been her father, though a blacksmith named Davis, of Charlton, in Wiltshire, near which stood the family-seat of the Howards, also claimed that distinction. Since the colonePs brothers, Robert and Edward, were both interested in the stage, the connection may possibly have facilitated her advance- ment in the royal favour. Good blood or no, this advancement appears to have caused great resentment in certain quarters of the Court. The Queen, not yet schooled to indifference to the vices of her volatile husband, was highly in- dignant, and when Miss Davis was dancing one of her favourite jigs in a play at Whitehall, her Majesty rose and " would not stay to see it." Lady Castlemaine, who had been overjoyed at the marriage of her involun- tary rival, Frances Stuart, was still more incensed and made no attempt to conceal it. Pepys relates how, one day at " The Duke's," Moll was seated in a box imme- diately over the royal box, in which were the King and Lady Castlemaine, and how when the King appeared to be far more interested in what was going on above than on the stage, her ladyship looked up to see who was there, and, " when she saw Moll Davis, she looked like fire, which troubled me." Since Charles had had the execrable taste to prefer an actress to herself, the exasperated sultana endeavoured to " get even " with him by extending her favour to an actor, to wit, Charles Hart, whom she visited quite openly at his own house. But his Majesty did not seem to mind very much. He was getting used to her ladyship's infidelities. CHAPTER IV ^pOWARDS the end of December, Nell Gwyn -*• achieved another great success, as Mirida in James Howard's All Mistaken, or The Mad Couple, one of those broad-comedy parts which suited her so admirably. " To the King's House," writes Pepys, " and there saw the Mai Couple, which is but an ordi- nary play ; but only Nell and Hart's mad parts are most excellently done, but especially hers ; which makes it a miracle to me to think how ill she do any serious part, as the other day, just like a fool or a changeling ; and in a mad part do beyond all imitation almost."* The scene which appears to have aroused the most enthusiasm was one in which the song and the incident which had caused the removal of little Miss Davis from her lodging on the cold ground to the luxuriously- furnished one in Suffolk Street was very cleverly paro- died. Hart, as Pinquisier, an abnormally fat man, whose adipose tissue is a sore obstacle to his love-making, sobs his complaints into the ear of his inamorata, the madcap Mirida. Mirida — Dear love, come sit thee in my lap, and let me know if I can enclose thy world of love and fat within these arms. See, I cannot nigh compass my desire by a mile. • Pepys, December 28, 1667. 6l 62 RIVAL SULTANAS Pinquisier — How is my fat a rival to my joys ! Sure I shall weep it all away. [Weeps.] Mirida — Lie still, my babe, lie still and sleep, It grieves me sore to see thee weep. Wert thou but leaner, I were glad, Thy fatness makes thy dear love sad. What a lump of love have I in my arms ! My lodging is on the cold boards, And wonderful hard is my fare, But that which troubles me most is The fatness of my dear. Yet still I cry, Oh melt, love, And I prythee now melt apace, For thou art the man I should long for If 'twere not for thy grease. Pinquisier — Then prythee don't harden thy heart still, And be deaf to my pitiful moan, Since I do endure thy smart still, And for my fat do groan. Then prythee now turn, my dear love, And I prythee now turn to me, For alas ! I am too fat still To roll so far to thee. Then Pinquisier proceeds to roll towards Mirida, who rolls away to escape him every time he draws near her — a proceeding which appears to have provoked the greatest mirth amongst the audience. We do not know whether the parody appealed to Charles II. as much as the song, but, any way, he seems to have been of opinion that the charming Mirida was deserving of a less adipose admirer than poor Pinquisier, for at the beginning of the following year a report arose that " the King had sent for Nelly." But let us listen to the Clerk of the Acts : "THE KING SENDS FOR NELLY" 63 " To the King's House, there to see The Wild-Goose Chase* Knepp came and sat by us, and the talk pleased me a little, she telling me that Miss Davis is for certain going away from the Duke's House, the King being in love with her, and a house is taken for her and furnish- ing ; and she hath a ring given her worth £600 ; that the King did send several times for Nelly, and she was with him, but what he did she knows not ; this was a good while ago ; f and she says that the King first spoiled Mrs. Weaver, which is very mean, methinks, in a prince, and I am sorry for it, and can hope for no good to the State, from having a prince so devoted to his pleasure."! • A play by Beaumont and Fletcher, first acted in 1632 and published in 1652. t According to Cunningham, Nell first attracted the King's attention in the part of Alizia, or Alice, Piers, the mistress of Edward III., in The Black Prince of the Earl of Orrery, produced at the King's House on October 19 in the pre- ceding year, in which she declaimed the following lines which " must have often in after life occurred to her recollection, not from their poetry, which is little enough, but from their particular applicability to her own story : You know, dear friend, when to this court I came, My eyes did all our bravest youth inflame ; And in that happy state I lived awhile, When Fortune did betray me with a smile ; Or rather Love against my peace did fight ; And to revenge his power, which I did slight, Made Edward our victorious monarch be One of those many who did sigh for me. All other flame but his I did deride ; They rather made my trouble than my pride : But this, when told me, made me quickly know, Love is a god to which all hearts must bow." This, if it were really the case, would be a most interesting coincidence, but unfortunately Mr. Wheatley, in one of his footnotes to the 1903 edition of the author's work, points out that it is by no means certain that it was Nell who acted the part of Alice Piers. For, though Downes, in his Roscius Anglicanus, says that the part was played by a " Mrs. Gwin," he probably refers to an Anne Quyn, another actress at the King's House, who is constantly confounded with " Mrs. Ellen Gwin," as he invariably describes Nell. X Pepys, January u, 1667-8. 64 RIVAL SULTANAS The rumour that Nell had been summoned to the royal presence, was followed by a report that she was about to give his Majesty a pledge of her gratitude, but this was difficult to reconcile with her continued appearances upon the stage, in The Duke of Lerma, by Sir Robert Howard — a play, Pepys tells us, " designed to reproach the King with his mistresses " — in which she spoke the prologue " most excellently " — as Vabria in Dry den's Tyrannick Love, or The Royal Martyr, and as Donna Jacintha in the same dramatist's comedy of An Evenings Love, or The Mock Astrologer. At the same time, rumours were afloat to the effect that my Lord Buckhurst's departure on a complimentary mission to the French Court was nothing but a " sleeveless errand " designed to get him out of the way and leave the field clear for his royal rival, and that his appointment as groom of the King's Bedchamber, with a pension of a thousand pounds a year, was by way of being a solatium for the loss of his inamorata. Which appears rather hard upon his lordship, whose affection for Nell would not appear to have survived their July " jaunt " to Epsom, though we cannot agree with the late Mr. Dutton Cook, who, in an article in the Gentleman' 's Magazine (May, 1883), endeavours to prove that Buck- hurst was " not the man to sell his mistress." In an age when a King was prepared to sell his country, or, at any rate, its honour, his courtiers were not likely to stick at selling a mistress. Towards the end of 1668, or the beginning of the following year, Nell removed from Drury Lane to a house in Lincoln's Inn Fields, where the King appears to have visited her pretty frequently, though not openly ; "THE KING SENDS FOR NELLY" 65 while the girl, on her side, was reported to have been summoned occasionally to Whitehall. The liaison was not, however, an established fact until the last week of 1669, when the time was drawing near for the pro- duction of a new tragedy by Dryden, The Conquest of Granada, in which Nell had been cast for the im- portant part of Almahide, a maiden whose beauty captivates the Moorish king. It was too dignified a part to promise her much of a success, but, by way of compensation, Dryden had written for her a witty prologue, which was confidently expected to take the town by storm. However, a few days before the day fixed for the production of the play, it was ascer- tained that the 'approach of an interesting domestic event would not allow of Mrs. Eleanor Gwyn under- taking the part, and, to the great disappointment of the public, the play had to be postponed. By a singular coincidence, the management of the Duke's Theatre, where a new piece was also announced for production, found themselves in a similar predicament, Miss Davis being incapacitated from appearing for the same reason as her rival in the affections of the King and the public. It is to be feared that such a contre- temps must have entailed a severe strain on the loyalty of both authors and actors. When The Conquest of Granada was at length pro- duced, which was not until the autumn of 1670, Dryden alluded to this double postponement in his epilogue : Think him not duller for the year's delay : He was prepared, the women were away ; And men without their parts can hardly play. If they through sickness seldom did appear, 66 RIVAL SULTANAS Pity the virgins of each theatre ; For at both houses 'twas a sickly year ! And pity us, your servants, to whose cost In one such sickness nine whole months were lost. The play was a great success, or, at any rate, the prologue was, which was spoken by Nell Gwyn " in a broad-brimmed hat and waistbelt, the broad-brimmed hat being a jest at the expense of an incident in a play recently produced at the rival playhouse." " At the Duke's Theatre," writes Waldron, in his edition of the Roscius Anglicanus, published in 1789, " Nokes appeared in a hat larger than Pistol's, which took the town wonderful, and supported a bad play by its fine effect. Dryden, piqued at this, caused a hat to be made the circumference of a timber coach-wheel ; and, as Nelly was low of stature, and what the French call mignonne or piquante, he made her speak under the umbrella of that hat, the brims thereof being spread out horizon- tally to their full extension. The whole theatre was in a convulsion of applause, nay, the very actors giggled, a circumstance none had observed before. Judge, therefore, what a condition the merriest prince alive was in at such a conjuncture ! 'Twas beyond odso and ods-fish, for he wanted little of being suffocated at such a conjuncture ! " Downes says that Charles was so delighted with Nell's performance that, after the play was over, he carried her off in his own coach to sup with him at Whitehall. And certainly Nell was entitled to some extra attention on the part of her royal admirer, since on May 8 of that year she had presented him with a son, Charles Beauclerk, the future Duke of St. Albans. I CHAPTER V THE MERRY MONARCH 1VTELL GWYN was nineteen years old when she ^ had the distinction of being " sent for by the King " in the winter of 1668-9, and the King con- tinued to send for, or to visit, her for the remainder of his life. For, though it was only a corner of the royal heart that she was privileged to occupy, it was a very warm corner indeed. And there can be little doubt that Nell was genuinely attached to her royal " pro- tector." While Lady Castlemaine, under the King's very eyes, ranged from peers and officers in the Guards to actors and rope-dancers,* Nell, having attained the height of her ambition, remained, for all evidence to the contrary, perfectly faithful to her " Charles the Third." That " pretty, witty Nelly " should have attracted the monarch's vagrant fancy is not in the least surprising, but that she should have retained her hold over him to the end of his days is a fact which requires some * Jacob Hall, the tight-rope dancer, was among those upon whom Lady Castlemaine bestowed her favours. Her ladyship saw him performing at Bartholomew Fair, Smithfield, and fell, according to Pepys, " mightily in love with him " ; and in April, 1668 he was a regular visitor at her house. 67 5* 68 RIVAL SULTANAS explanation. She was not the first actress with whom Charles had had tender relations. There were Mrs. Weaver and Mrs. Knight and Moll Davis, but none of these affairs was of an enduring character, though little Miss Davis continued to be the object of fugitive attentions on his Majesty's part at any rate up to 1673, in which year she presented him with a daughter.* Nell, however, " the indiscreetest and wildest creature that ever was in a Court," f continued in high favour until the King's death, and " Let not poor Nelly starve ! " were Charles's last recorded words. What then is the explanation of this permanent attachment ? It is, we think, that just as Barbara Villiers appealed to the animal side of Charles's nature, and Louise de Keroualle to what was refined and intellectual in him, Nell appealed to his Bohemian side — to his dislike of ceremony and constraint, to his love of ease and good- fellowship. " It was," writes one of Charles's historians, " the frank recklessness of the Latin Quarter, the fear- lessness of her banter, her irrepressible gaiety, the spontaneousness of her practical jokes, her cama- raderie, and unfailing goodness of temper which made her hold on him secure. She was a true child of the London streets, apt of wit and shrewd of tongue ; and her very honesty of vice, her want of reticence, her buoyant indiscretions, her refusal to take herself seriously and regard herself as another but what she * This girl, Mary Tudor, was acknowledged by the King. She married, in 1687, Francis Radcliffe, second Earl of Derwentwater, whose son James, the third earl, was beheaded on Tower Hill in 171 6, for his share in the Jacobite rebellion of the previous year. f Burnet, " History of My Own Time." THE MERRY MONARCH 69 was, have strangely enough secured for her a sort of positive affection in the respectable England of to-day, as they did during her joyous, irresponsible life."* If Nell, as so many women of similar origin would have done, had committed the mistake of endeavouring to play the lady, she would very speedily have bored Charles, who could, alas ! have had a whole seraglio of real ladies if he wanted them. But she preferred to remain herself — " anybody," as one of her rivals in the royal affections was once heard to remark, " might know she had been an orange-girl by her swearing " — and the contrast between his plebeian mistress and the high-bred ladies of his Court served to amuse the King for more than fifteen years. But let us see what manner of man was this King who could find so much attraction in the society of a daughter of the people, for hitherto we have only spoken of one side of a curiously multiple character. The popular conception of Charles II., that of a selfish, good-humoured voluptuary, " who never said a foolish thing, and never did a wise one," is very far removed from the truth ; and it is not a little strange that it should so long have survived, when we consider with what ability his character has been drawn for us by the many distinguished writers to whom he was personally known : by Clarendon and Halifax ; by Evelyn and Temple ; by Burnet, Dryden, and Roger North. It is, indeed, doubtful whether any King who ever sat on the English throne was endowed by Nature with • Mr. Osmund Airy, " Charles II." 70 RIVAL SULTANAS a keener intellect than this " tall man, above two yards high " — to quote the description of him issued after the Battle of Worcester — with his fine dark eyes, his long, swarthy, saturnine countenance, which con- cealed " a merry and merciful disposition,"* his digni- fied carriage, and his " great voice." f Halifax praises his admirable memory and his acute powers of observation, and tells us that whenever one of his Ministers fell, the King was always at hand with a full inventory of his faults. His capacity for king- craft, knowledge of the world, and easy address enabled him to surmount difficulties which would have proved fatal to his father or brother. " It was a common saying that he could send away a person better pleased at receiving nothing than those in the good King his father's time that had requests granted them ; "J and his good-humoured tact and familiarity com- pensated in a great degree in the eyes of the nation for his many failings and preserved his popularity. He spoke French fluently, though he does not seem to have written it very idiomatically, and understood Italian. The classical side of his education would appear to have been somewhat neglected, as he is said not to have read Latin with ease. On the other hand, he was well grounded in critical and political litera- ture, as well as in English law and divinity. He had all the hereditary love of the Stuarts for poets and poetry. He carried Butler's Hudibras about in his pocket and protected its publication by royal warrant, # Savile. f Evelyn. % " Memoirs of Thomas, Earl of Aylesbury." THE MERRY MONARCH 71 and suggested the Medal to Dryden as a subject for a poem while walking in the Mall. " If I were a poet," said he, " and I think I am poor enough to be one, I would write a poem on such a subject in the following manner." Dryden took the hint, carried his poem to the King, and received a hundred gold pieces for it. Like others of his race, like James I. and James V. of Scotland, like his father and grandfather, he was on occasion a poet himself. Here is a song of his com- position, which, as Cunningham observes, is certainly characteristic of his way of life : I pass all my hours in a shady old grove, But I live not the day when I see not my love ; I survey every walk now my Phillis is gone, And sigh when I think we were there all alone ; O then, 'tis O then, that I think there's no hell Like loving, like loving too well. But each shade and each conscious bow'r when I find, Where I once have been happy, and she has been kind ; When I see the print left of her shape on the green, And imagine the pleasure may yet come again ; O then 'tis I think that no joys are above The pleasures of love. While alone to myself I repeat all her charms, She I love may be locked in another man's arms, She may laugh at my cares, and so false she may be, To say all the kind things she before said to me ; then, 'tis O then, that I think there's no hell Like loving too well. But when I consider the truth of her heart ; Such an innocent passion, so kind without art ; 1 fear I have wronged her, and hope she may be So full of true love to be jealous of me ; And then 'tis I think that no joys are above The pleasures of love. 72 RIVAL SULTANAS In matters connected with the stage he showed even more discernment than in poetry, and the drama owed much to his encouragement. It was he who, as we have seen, suggested to Dryden the idea of his comedy of Secret Love, or The Maiden Queen, in which Nell Gwyn scored her first great success, nor was this the only play which owed its inspiration to the same source. For, not long before his death, he drew the attention of the poet Crowne to the Spanish play, No