Qass. Book ValksanpTalks BY WILLIAM HAWLFY ^MJTH AUTHOR OF *'The Evolution of Dodd'' CHICAGO A. Flanagan, Publisher. C:OP\RIGHT BY WILLIAM HAWLEY SMITH '• / tramp \ perpetii(^kSfQ]ir^^\}^i^ I ask jfoti to come walk with '' And each nul^^h^^^p^^^l^M^Q^^^ lipon a knoll, *' My right hand pmMtW^^^^^^pes of continents and the public road. '^ Not /, not any one else^ can travel that road for you, " You must travel it yourself ! ''So, shoidder your bundle, dear frieyid, and I will mine, and let us hasteji forth, 'f you tire, give me both burdens, and rest yotir hand on my arm. And in due time you shall repay the same service to me. For, after we start, we shall never lie by again! So, Come on! zvhoever you are, and let us travel together! Traveling with me, you shall find zvJiat never tires. The earth never tires! The earth is rude, silent, incompreJiensible at first ; Nature is rude and incomprehensible at first ; But be not discouraged. Keep on. TJiere are divine tilings there, well enveloped. " There are divine things there more beautiful than words ca?i tell ! '* Com.e on ! We must not stop Jiere ! ^''However sweet these laid-up stores, Iiow ever convenient this dwelling, zve cannot remain Jiere. '"However sheltered this port and hozvever calm these zvaters, we must 7iot anclior Jiere. '^ However welcome the Jiospitality that surrounds us, we are permitted to receive it but a little witile. " Co7ne on! Yet take warning! 6 WALKS AND TALKS. ^^He traveling zvith me needs the best blood, thews, enduraiict * 'None may come to the trial till he or she bring courage a?ii health. " Come not here if you have already spent the best of yourselj *' Only those may come zvho come in szveet and determined bodies. " Come on! after the Great Companions.^ and to belong zvith them! •* They^ too^ are on the road — they are the szvift and majestic men — they are the greatest and grandest zvomen! ** Co7ne on! to that zvhich is endless as it zvas beginningless. " To undergo much, tramp of days, rest of nights ; *' To see ?iothing, anyzvhere^ but that you may reach it and pass it; " To conceive of no time.^ Jiozuever distant, but that you may reach it and pass it; " To look up or dozvn no road but it stretches and zv aits for you — hozvever long^ it stretches and zv aits for you! *' Whoever you are, come forth! or man or zvoma?i, come forth! " You fnust not stay sleeping and dallying there iii the house ^ though you built it, or though it zvas built for you. " Come 071 ! the road is before us! '* // is safe — / have tried it — my ozvn feet have tried it zvell, "Come on ! " Comrade, I give you my hand! " I give you my love, more precious than money ; '^ I give you myself before all preaching or lazv ; " Will you give me yoiirself? Will you come and travel ivitJi me ; " Shall zve stick by each other pist as long as zve live f " INDEX. A Hunter's Philosophy 11 Among the Aztecs 48 An Open Book 39 Born '• Short " 113 "Dot" 93 " Exams." 79 Five Out of Thirty 157 Geography and Music 2.1 Half-Tones by the Million 177 Honorificabilitudinity 186 House Cleaning and History 202 How He Knew It 122 In An Industrial School ie2 Incorrigibles 106 In Institute Assembled 143 Jones's Dream 153 8 WALKS AND TALKS. Light, Air, Heat and Health 134 Mexican Class-Room Work 62 Photographs 166 Rats 86 " Specialty Business " 74 Squeaks and Grease 194 Thanksgiving 179 The Bad Boy's Mother 102 "The Only" , 71 The Outset 9 The Schools of Mexico 55 Through Memory's Ways 20 To You 30 Two After-Dinner Speeches 218 Whittling 126 Walks and Talks. THE OUTSET. In that far distant era when our "entering class" stood up around Mary Montague's knees and learned our letters in the orthodox fashion of taking the alphabet ''in course," as everybody was expected to take everything in those days, I remember that that motherly old maid of a Yankee schoolmarm gave us some " supplementary work," as it would be called now, in the shape of little verses that we learned and recited in concert, our arms entwined around each other, and the whole little charmed circle swaying and weaving, back and forth, in even time, as we said the lines over in a sing-song way. And among these verses, thus learned and recited, there was one that began : "Whene're I take my walks abroad, How many s I see." I have forgotten just what the word WiS that fitted in where I have left a blank ; nor do I know why my memory should have failed to hold the particular monosyllable that evidently belongs in there, while clinging fast to all the rest of the lines ; but after nearly fifty years' acquaint- ance with this mental 'furniture of mine, I have quit trying to account for all its peculiarities — omissions, commis- sions and what not. 10 WALKS AND TALKS. There was some word of one syllable that went there, and, as I look at it now, I find that it does not make so very much difference what it was, for any one of a hun- dred will do just as well as the one the original rhymer used. And, perhaps, after all, it is fully as well to let the blank stand, and permit each reader to fill it in " as occasion requires or opportunity offers," as our pastor says in prayer meeting. And so I am not going to worry my head about the original word, nor shall I care a straw if any delver after " primary forms " should hunt out this old fossil and send me the particular chip which is lacking in the specimen I have shown above ; for, put any one word in this niche and it narrows the same down to the particular thing which that one word stands for, and this leaves the lines far less true to the reality than they are with my blank holding up the heavy end of the iambus in this particular* line. So I leave it as it is, merely remarking that there are a good many other things in this old world that are similar to this. It does not pay to try to put them into their original forms, for they are better to us as we have them. Doubtless, it will not do to carry this argument too far ; but, run to a reasonable length, it works well and yields most blessed results. And so, as I was about to remark, " Whene're I take my walks abroad," — as I do every day and sometimes several times a day, — I see more things than any one word can stand for ; and when a man undertakes to put words in my mouth which shall tell what I am doing. I want those words to tell the whole story, or else to stand back and give me a chance to speak for myself. Or, per- haps, we can compromise the matter ; the rhymer may tell all of my story he can and I will do the rest. I will A HUNTER'S PHILOSOPHY. 11 take these lines, just as I have quoted them, reserving only the blank for myself, to fill in as I choose ; and, just as the magic lantern man reserves for himself a little blank slot in his instrument into which he can slip any " slide " that he can get hold of, and always with a varied effect, so I will keep this blank open, and into it I will slip, from time to time, the things I see " when e'rc I take my walks abroad." A HUNTER'S PHILOSOPHY. I went out hunting a few days ago — took a walk abroad among sedge-grass and cockle-burs, down along the river bottom, where cranes are wont to congregate and croak, where mud-hens multiply and chuckle to each other in the secret places of swamp and fen, and where, occasionally — very occasionally — a duck disports itself, a half a mile or so from shore, out of range of any weapon, unless it be a howitzer or Gatling-gun. But we went hunting, just the same ; walked and talked as of yore, and did several things besides, things which thi^ hronicle has no particular business with, and which for that reason will be omitted from this truthful tale. There was one novelty about our trip this season ; we all took rifles instead of shotguns. The matter was settled at a meeting of the club, a month or so ago. At this meeting some discussion arose about skill in marksman- ship, and a very eloquent member made a telling speech about rifle-shooting as contra-distinguished from shotgun ditto. 12 WALKS AND TALKS. The point he made was that the marksman who could bag game as the result of a single bullet sent after each particular bird, by that very act proved himself an artist with a fowling-piece ; while the man who used a shotgun, which belches forth a thousand leaden pellets at each dis- charge, and these scattered over a wide area, could never tell whether he really was a good shot, or whether his awkwardness in shooting all ways at once should be credited with his success as a sportsman. The talk on the subject ran high for a while ; and, finally, to settle the matter for one year, at least, it was agreed that we should all take rifles on our annual outing this season. So we all took rifles. My own gun was of the most recent make, manufac- tured in the East, and by a firm which has a most excel- lent and enviable reputation for making the best goods of the kind to be had in this or any other market. The maker's name was stamped upon the barrel as a guarantee that the article was genuine. And it was really a good gun. I think it was all it was ever recommended to be, and I have no word of fault to find with it as a gun ; nevertheless, ! shot with it for two days and never touched a feather ! Of course this was unpleasant ; for, formerly, on shotgun basis, I had always managed to bring in about a: average bagful of game ; and now to come in empty handed, two days in succession, was little less than dis grace. It seemed to establish the truth of my eloquen- friend's theory that my record as a sportsman depende. upon my promiscuous, rather than upon my definite an direct shooting — a conclusion which was by no mean flattering to my self-esteem, to say nothing of my vanit) But the third day I set out as before, and, as good Iuck A HUNTER'S PHILOSOPHY. 13 would have it, I came upon a fine flock of ducks in a small pool, within easy range of a thick clump of brush which served me as a cover. The birds had not dis- covered my approach, and were disporting themselves with the utmost nonchalance as I made ready to shoot. I drew a bead on a large drake that sat perfectly still about fifty yards away, and fired ! If ever I was sure of game in my life it was just at the moment when I pulled the trigger of that gun. But the result was the same as before ; or, rather, worse, for this time the birds did not even do me the honor to fly. They only lifted their heads for a minute, as though a bit surprised, and then went to feeding again. To say that I was disgusted is to but feebly express my emotions as I lay hidden in that clump of bushes, and tor four successive times blazed away at those unconcerned and aggravating ducks, which now seemed to be growing accustomed to my fusilade, and rather to enjoy than to tear it. I blamed the gun and those who made it. I called myself names, and grew red in the face. I — But just as I was making ready for the fifth shot, and had declared to myself that I would smash my gun into smithereens if I did not kill that time, I heard a slight noise on my left, and turning, I saw the burly form of an old river hunter lying full length in the bushes not ten feet from me. He had heard my firing, and I think out Df sheer curiosity had crawled into my cover to see what t was all about. He was a typical man of his class, rough, bearded, anned to a copper color, and dressed in yellow jeans. He lad never belonged to a gun club, and I doubt if he at all :nevv the meaning of " Extra Dry." I am quite sure he ould not have passed a written examination on " Sports- aanship from an Esthetic Point of View," especially if 14 WALKS AND TALKS. the professor in our club had had the privilege of pre- paring the questions ; but the denoument showed that he knew a thing or two, for all that I have said that I saw him, etc. Evidently he had been in his present position for some time, and had wit- nessed my former endeavors and failures, for as soon as I caught his eye he said, under his oreath : ** You d — n fool, lower your hindsight I Hdnt you got sense enough to see that you are shootin over 'em every time ! " I '* lowered my hind-sight," and we had ducks for supper cut of my bag that night I was sitting on the platform at an educational gather- ing, not long ago, and the professor in charge was dic- tating some very excellent words to the teachers there assembled, reading from a book, a few words at a time, the teachers writing as he read, thus : "It should be the aim of education — to effect the triune result — etc., etc." There were about a hundred teachers writing, and when the reader pronounced the word " triune," I think at least ninety of the writers looked up for an instant and scowled inquiringly, then dropped their eyes and hurried on with their notations. The reader made no pause at this demonstration — took no notice of it, in fact, but went on dictating, a few words at a time, to the end of the some- what long and stilted, not to say slightly high-flown sen- tence, his listeners writing as best they could. The exercise was continued for about fifteen minutes, and among the sentences dictated occurred the words, "apperception," "conjunctivity," "curricula," "adum- bration/' ar^t^ "' ':z-N more of about the same size and weight. And every time one of these words was shot into A HUNTER'S PHILOSOPHY. 15 that audience, so to speak, there was the same lifting of heads, inquiring elevation of eyebrows, scowl, and return to writing on the part of about nine out of every ten of those who were doing their best to set down what the reader of the book was saying. When all was over, I asked the professor if he would call on some one who had been writing to read what he or she had written. He readily consented, and at once asked a very bright-looking girl, of about twenty, who sat just before him, to stand and read her notes. She blushed and looked down, hesitatingly, and finally said : " I can't do it." "Why not?" said the professor. *• I haven't got it all written down," replied the girl. "Did I read too fast?" said the professor. " No, I guess not," said the girl. "Well, then, what's the matter?" said the professor. The girl hesitated and blushed still deeper, while there was an anxious look on nearly every face in the room. It was at this point that I begged for a word, and asked the young lady if she would read as far as she had written, be the same more or less. She was a brave girl ( it "takes genuine bravery, and a good deal of it, to do what I asked her to do, the circumstances being what they were ) and so, with a resolute, not to say half des- perate motion, she rose and read: " It should be the aim of education to effect the " She stopped, and I said: "Well?" "I didn't understand the next word," she said. " How many in the room did understand the next word, and have it written down?" I asked. 16 WALKS AND TALKS. There was a pause; then some two or three hands went up promptly and perhaps half a dozen timidly, but the ninety held their peace. "Will all who did not get the word written down please to stand? " I asked. " Come! It's no disgrace to say we don't know when we don't know," I added. And then there was a sound as of a rushing mighty wind, and the ninety arose, en masse. The professor looked puzzled. He was a clever gen- tleman, and a most thorough scholar, and he read excep- tionally well, in a clear, full voice, pronouncing every word distinctly, and how it was that all these people had missed this word of two syllables was more than he could comprehend. And then I said to a young man who stood in front: "What was the matter with the word that you did not get it?" And he replied: " I don't think I ever heard it be- fore! " Whereupon, these words have been spoken, eighty- nine pairs of eyes, or thereabouts, looked into mine and said as plain as eyes can say anything, "That's just it!" I confess that I was a good deal surprised at this generous and wholesale confession on the part of these teachers, for the word in question had hardly struck me as being so very unusual and the people before me were by no means dull or dumb. On the contrary, they were more than averagely bright Nevertheless, the great fact remained that the word "triune" was a stranger to their eyes and ears thus far! Not to prolong the story, the professor took the cue and proceeded with a still further reading of the notes taken from his reading only to find "apperception," "conjunctivity," "curricula," " adumbration," and several more of similar sort among the things that were not. At dinner, just before this exercise, I had told the A HUNTER'S PHILOSOPHY. 17 professor my hunting experience, narrated above, nnd after he had staggered along with this notes-reading for about ten minutes, and had found out what a thing of shreds and patches it was in reality, when compared with what he had expected it to be, he turned to me and said, under his breath. '' It looks a good deal as though I had better lower my kind sight.'' And I thiuK he was right about it too. The fact is, it is a common fault to shoot over: — "Agitate the water, Michael," said a clergyman to an Irishman who was cleaning out his well. " An' phat the divil is that? " said Mike. *^Stir it up," said the man at the windlass, and it was done! I have a friend who is the most brilliant scholar of my acquaintance, but he delights in polysyllables, and his language is of the strictly classical sort. The maid-of-all- work in his kitchen is a Swede, who, while she is an ex- cellent cook, speaks English only on the installment plan, with very limited installments at that. My friend tried to tell her something to do, the other day, and after sev- eral most eloquent efforts he gave up in despair. He hunted up his wife (a very sensible and plain spoken woman, she is), and told her that he "could not make hat stupid girl understand." (He reads Greek, Latin, ■^rench, German and Italian.). The good woman listened o his tale of woe, and then went and told the girl what :o do, using simple words that were easily understood. When she came back she remarked to her husband: ^My dear, if you would be less Johnsonese you would be .ar more understandable." 18 JVALKS AND TALKS. / And as he loves peace and quiet at home he at once proceeded to ** lower his hind sight." And there is that other acquaintance of mine, who told me that not long ago he sat down to write a lecture, and how he covered six full pages with a most brilliant introduction, all filled with " hyperbole, metaphor, met- tonomy, prosody peia, superbaton, cattychraysis, metty- lipsis, and hustheron-protheron," as Father Tom has it. Having written so much, he took it down and read it tc his wife. And s/ie, toO, is a most sensible woman. (These women, God bless them! How could we get on withoul them?) She heard him through, and then said, quietly •*Oh, Charles, come off the perch! " And to his credit be it said, he did as he was told. But 1 think it is in the school-room, more than any where else, that we "shoot over," and so ought to " lowe; the hind sights" of our pedagogical guns, as it were. In deed I am certain that any teaclier will be surprised, no to say appalled, if he or she will carefully watch th< effect, or rather the lack of effect, that their words hav( upon pupils. The young people hear what we say, per haps so far as the material ear is concerned, but they d( not understand and we are to blame because they do not We talk of predicate-nominatives and substantiv- phrases to ten and twelve-year-olds, in the grammar class and these long-range missiles fly yards and yards ove; and beyond the game they are aimed at! We fire involu tion and permutation into droves of eighth-graders. They "duck their heads " for a minute, and then go on chew ing gum just as though nothing had happened, careles alike of ourselves and of the noises we make. And this is the really pitiful, not to say tragic, thin about it all. Our young people get into the habit of listenin to words that make no impression upon them, and the resu A HUNTERS PHILOSOPHY. 19 is that they very soon get careless, especially upon all educational matters. Or, perhaps I should say they get discouraged. No one likes to be continually listening to what he does not understand, and if long compelled to do so, he will either be bored beyond endurance, or involuntarily and unwittingly get a poor opinion of his ability to un- derstand and comprehend what it is supposed he ought to learn about. And if a pupil gets in the way of thinking that he is not going to understand, the chances are many to one that he will not understand; and w^hen he has reached that point, the limit of educational growth, in that direc- tion, is close at hand. The true test of really great things is their simplicity. They are so easily understood by everybody. In that v/onderful art gallery at the World's Fair, it was the simple pictures that drew the crowds, the ones that all understood, and crowded upon each other to look at. "Breaking Family Ties," '' Preparing for the Wedding," "The Alarm," '^The Reply," and a thousand more that could be named — these are the great works of art, and ;ey are simple and as easily understood as they are comparable as artistic productions. And the same is true in other lines of art. It is now V- ght years since Mr. Denman Thompson brought out tnat simplest of all dramas, "The Old Homestead," but be is still playing it to crowded and ever delighted audi- ences. "Uncle Tom's Cabin" is simplicity itself in plot, execution, and language, but a world has read it, with veeping eyes, and knows the story by heart. It is further recorded of the Master of us all that "the common people heard him gladly." How are you shooting beloved? 20 . WALKS AND TALKS. THROUGH MEMORY'S WAYS. While I was waiting my turn at the bank, the other day, I overheard the following conversation between the cashier and a customer who stood the third, man ahead of me, his nose almost against the little brass-grated win- dow, as he spoke: Customer — "Do you remember the number of that draft on Chicago which you gave me one day last week?" Cashier — "No, sir, I don't. It is a rule of this bank to remember 7tothing. But if you can tell me the date on which you got the draft, I can readily find the number for you." ' Whereupon, the date being given by the customer aforesaid, it was the work of but an instant for the cashier to turn to the record of drafts issued on that day, and there find the desired information. Shortly afterwards I passed a leading merchant of the city in conversation with a gentleman with whom he evidently had the most amicable of business relations, and this is what I heard him say, as I went along: '* No, don't ask me to remember your order, but go down to the store and leave a memorandum of what you want, and then you arc sure to get it, But if I should try to remember it for you, the chances arc a hundred to one that you wouldn't see the goods for six months." And when I went to the sash factory, and ordered a sash made to fit our north cellar window (we are going to have double sash in that window this winter, sure. We have tlioiight for the last five years that we would fix it that way, but, somehow, have always forgotten it till now. THROUGH MEM0BT8 WAYS. 21 But wife made a memorandum about it, one day last week, and put the same where I couldn't help seeing it, and so the sash is ordered.) I say, when I told the sash man what I wanted, he said, "Make a memprandum, please, of just the size you want, and there will be no mistake in filling your order." And so it was that, when I went to the tailor for a suit of clothes, he measured me up one side and down the other, as smart as you please, calling out the inches and fractions of an inch, of each measurement in a good round tone, while his clerk wrote all these numbers down in a book, where they are, even unto this day, showing just what manner of man I am, so far as size and shape are concerned, beyond all question or cavil. We lost some freight, some time since, and asked the railroad company to look it up for us. So they sent out a "tracer" for the goods — that is, a letter, that should fol- low along the same route that the goods were supposed to have traveled. This letter went, first, to the freight of^ce from which the goods were originally shipped. The agent there referred to his record regarding this par- ticular package of merchandise. He found that he had received it from the transfer company, and had billed it Dut, on a certain train, to a certain station where it was to :)e transferred to another line of road. That cleared his )kirts. Then he wrote a letter to the agent at the station vhere the package was to have been transferred, described .he goods, told what train they were shipped on, and isked him to show up what he knew about them. This gent referred to his record, found out what disposition he had made of the package, and so on ; till, finally, the goods were found and laid down at their proper desti- nation. I saw a drug clerk fill out a prescription, not long ago 22 WALKS AND TALKS. and I noticed that he followed the doctor's written direc^ tions, explicitly; and when he had the mixture com- pounded, he filed the original prescription, which was numbered to correspond with the label on the bottle, on a hook, where if could be referred to, years hence, if need be. And when I went to my dentist with a tooth which was giving me trouble, and which I assured him he had filled some years before, he astonished me by turning to a record of the work he had done for me for the past ten years, and, to use the vernacular, this particular tooth "wasn't in it" at all. The simple truth was that I was mistaken, and had forgotten that it was a dentist a thou- sand miles from here who filled the molar that was now giving offense. Once I was in the office of the Youth's Companion and the manager kindly showed me how they handle their voluminous mail (thousands of letters a day), with so much ease and accuracy. Thus, the letters are all opened by a clerk whose particular business is to do just this work. He makes a hasty glance at the contents of each letter, and long practice has enabled him to determine unerringly, and with great despatch, the proper depart- ment to which each one should be referred. This done, he puts his stamp upon the document, showing that it has been through his hands and referred, and deposits it in some one of several baskets that are ranged about him, each basket holding letters for a sepa' ate department. The contents of these baskets are carried to their several de- partments and there disposed of by the various clerks in those departments. Every clerk who has anything whatever to do with any letter that comes into his or her hands piits his mark and memorazidnin on the same, for future reference, if such should ever be required. THBOUGH MEM0BT8 WAYS, 23 When all is done, the letter is filed where it can readily be referred to, and on its blank spaces there is a writ- ten record of every one's hands it has passed through, and just what each one has done. If there is ever any trouble, if a mistake has been made, anywhere, it is an easy matter to trace the whole business up, and find out just who it was that made the error, and what the error was that was made. All such errors are charged up to the clerks who make them, and on this record clerks are promoted or deposed. Those who make few mistakes go up; those who blunder go down — and out, if the same thing happens more than a fixed number of times. Now what I started out to say was, that in all these instances that I have cited, there isn't as much memory zvork, all put together, as is given the average pupil in our public schools any half day in the year. In a word, in the business world it is a fundamental principle not to try to remember anything. And this means, I take it, that ex- periefice has demonstrated the fact that the memory is such a treacherous faculty that it is not at all to be relied tiponfor exact data regarding the things that are past. And yet, to what infinite lengths of labor do our schools and colleges go to "develop the memory." The question I wish to raise is, is the game worth the candle? Is this faculty of the human mind of enough importance to have three-fourths of all the time spent in school de- voted to its "development"? And, more than all, does the titanic strain that is put upon the memory by all our school courses — does this tend to strengthen that faculty; or, rather, does it not tend to deplete it? To a considera- tion of this question, "let facts be submitted to a candid world." ■ And to get such submission of facts, oh my dear 24 WALKS AND TALKS. reader, all you have to do is to get inside of yourself,, and take a memory-invoice of what stock of that sort you have on hand at this day and date. That will tell the story, so far as you are concerned; and to you, that is better than the testimony of ten thousand other folks. So get at it now, and see how it comes out in your case. And, first, was the game worth the candle, so far as you are concerned? Did you get net results from burn- ing the midnight oil, while 3^ou strove to Tuemorize the area and population of each state in the union, to say nothing of the rivers, lakes, mountains, towns, cities, and what not; from getting lists of dates so that you could say them backwards or forwards or "skipping around;" from learning atomic weights and combining numbers so that you could say them without the book ; from getting all the grammar rules so that you could repeat them, every one, in order ; or from saying over punctuation rules, which you never did see any sense in, and never could apply — I say, out of all this monstrous mass of memory work that you did in school, have you ever got enough to pay you for all the time and trouble you went to, to get good enough marks out of it all to graduate on ? How is it ? I have figured the thing through, in my own case, and have "got the answer." I won't ask you to memorize it, but I will write it down, right here, where you can refer to it any time you want to. And this ^t is : // did not pay me. And I do not say this unadvisedly. Look at it in any way I may, the result is the same. If 1 say, ** How much of this matter, that I strove so hard to memorize while ' student in school, have I had occasion to use since I lei": school ?" I am appalled at the paucity of opportunit' for the utilization of what I worked so diligently to THROUGH MEMORT 8 WAYS. 25 And if I ask, " How much of what I could then recite without the book do I still hold in my memory ?" I am startled at the percentage of loss. Why, I cannot now give the area or population of a single state in the Union, though I learned them all, thoroughly, twenty-five years ago. And as for historic dates, atomic weights, punctuation rules, and the whole line of similar things that I sat up, night after night, to learn, they are a blank to me now — an utter blank. But what do I care for that ? There is a cyclopedia over there on the shelf (I can almost reach it without getting out of my chair, as I write), and it holds all these things without an effort — keeps them ready and waiting for me, whenever I have occasion to use them. And so, if I want to know the area of New York, or the popu- lation of California, all I have to do is to turn to the page, and, there you are! Right, too. No guess-work. No " I think it is," or " as I remember it." Nothing of that sort, but good, honest figures, that time will not blot out or get mixed up. And there is the chemistry over there, and here are the histories (oh, how easy it is for them to hold those dates, thousands of them ; and what delight it is to me to go and find them, just right, when I want them). And the grammar and punctuation book— though, to be honest, I never do refer to that. I learned to punctuate after I got out of school; in such an easy way, too, and wholly without that book. I was talking, one evening, with a friend, and he said : " The way to learn to punctuate is to punctuate." " But," I said, " I can't. I don't know how. I studied the art for six months, in school ; but, somehow, I can't do anything at it." " Well," said he, "I will tell you how to learn to punctuate. Notice, care- fully, how the articles you read in any good magazine, or 26 WALKS AND TALKS. metropolitan newspaper, are punctuated, and stop your reading every once in a while, and ask yourself why any given sentence is punctuated as it is, and you will be sur- prised to find how soon you will learn to punctuate well." And I did as he told me, and I found it to be even as he had said. And I see no good reason why my teacher in punctuation could not have used a sensible method of this sort, and taught me punctuation so that I could punc- tuate, instead of spending the time trying to develope my memory by making me learn punctuation rules and ex- ceptions — largely exceptions — that I didn't understand and never could apply ! So, I never refer to the punc- tuation-book. But I do refer to nearly all the other books in my library, as I have need. Occasionally I turn the pages of some old school book, for reference, but I am sure I could do it equally well now, even if I had not been forced to memorize the zuhole volume when a student. No ! to my mind our schools are all wrong in giving their pupils so much memory work, and I am certain that their so doing docs not strengthen the memory nor culti- vate the mind. On the other hand, I am convinced that it debilitates the mnemonic faculty and tends to stupify the intellect. It is a well recognized principle in physiology that if you overtax an organ you thereby weaken it. We over- burden the memories of our pupils, and thereby weaken that faculty in them. We give them such memory-loads to carry that they cannot stand up under them, and so they throw them off at the very first chance they can get. All they try to do is to hold on to the matter until they can pass an examination in it, and then they let it all slip; as, surely, they are obliged to do, to make room for a new load. And so it is that ilicy f.iUinto the habit of forgetting THROUGH MEMOBTS WAYS. 27 rather than remembering — an outcome which is the very reverse of what was promised — and paid for ! Just here I got to wondering how it happens that our schools have fallen into such abnormal ways of teaching, and here is what has come to me about it. I wonder if this predominance of memory-work in our schools is not a direct descendent from the methods used in the days whe?i there zvere no books ! In those times the only way in which the knowledge of one could be made available by another was for that other to remember it. The only way for the pupil to acquire the knowledge which the teacher had to impart was to commit it to memory, and the only way the teacher could know that his pupil had acquired what ne had imparted was to test his memory about it. And this is how '' exams T came into being. They were all right and proper in their time, and, as such, they took rank and place in an educational system. But when the era of books came, they became antiquated methosls, and would long ago have been dropped, but for the ]i ^r- sistence of habit. What a powerful force habit is ! Well, if these things are so (and I see no good rea, on to doubt them), it is perfectly clear that we ought tc let up, greatly, on the memory work that is now doing in our schools. "But," some one says, "didn't Edward Everett get so that he could read a newspaper through, and then fold it up and recite every word that it contained ? and could not Prof. Watson recite a full table of logarithms, true to six places, without ever referring to a book ? etc., and so on to the end of the chapter. Yes, verily, these men could do these things; and "Uncle Dick" Oglesby can, to this day, call by his first name every man in the one hundred and two counties in Illinois that he has ever been introduced to ; and I know a man who can charm birds, 28 WALKS AND TALKS. and nearly all other animals — make them do almost any- thing he wishes to have them do ; and there is an old hunter up the river who will shoot a duck on the wing, nine times out of ten, and never bring his gun to his shoulder — just hold it against his side, and, without taking sight at all, blaze away and down his game every time ; and Bishop VVhatley, as a boy of six, could work mathematical problems, mentally, in a few minutes, that it would take his father some hours to figure out, though the old gentleman was himself apt at figures ; and Blind Tom can hear a piece of music once, and play it over exactly ; and John L. Sullivan can strike a blow with his fist, that will fell an ox ; and Jay Gould made a $100,000,- 000, because he had it in him to do just that. But, forsooth, because these things are so it does not follow that methods should be introduced into our public schools whose purpose it should be to enable every pupil to call by his first name every man he might ever be intro- duced to ; or to tame birds, lions and all other wild fowl ; or to shoot without taking sight ; or to mentally acquire a product of twenty places ; or to strike with the fist like a sledge-hammer ; or to make ;^ioo,ooo,ooo out of nothing but manipulation ! Now, the fact is that the miraculous nie^nory feats of Mr. Everett and Mr. Webster and Mr. Gladstone and ail of their kind, that have been held up for our emulation and imitation, are phenomenal. These men did these wonderful things because they were born with special gifts in that line, and it is just as nonsensical to talk about making every boy and girl in our schools work toward the attainment of these achievements as it would be to try to make them all develop heads of the size of lAx, Webster's, or play like Blind Tom, or strike like Sullivan. And yet this memory training is upheld because these memory THROUGH MEM GET 8 WAYS 29 giants did these wonderful things. It is time this delusion was abandoned. Because, the truth is that memory is not such an im- portant faculty of the mind that it should receive the great bidk of all the attention that is given to me?ital training in our schools. And yet it does so receive, the country over, to- day. To be plain about it, this memory of ours, however drilled, is one of our most treacherous mental possessions. No business man ever relies on it in any matter where absolute accuracy is required. In our courts, the testi- mony of witnesses who mean to tell the truth and who do their best to do so, but who fail to tell things as they really occurred, because their memory has played them false, shows how unreliable this mental faculty is. Ask any lawyer or judge, and he will tell you all about it ; or, prob- ably, you know well enough about it yourself. I do. The other day I was on the witness-stand, and was asked if I had not, about three years before, received a certain letter from one of the parties to the suit. My im- pulse was to testify that I never received any such letter, or any letter whatever, from the person in question ; but, to make the matter sure, I said that I had no recollection of ever receiving any letter from the party ; but, I added, " if I ever did receive such a letter it would be on file in my office." When I came off the stand, the judge told me that I might go and look for that letter, since, if it were written, as claimed, it would be important evidence. I went and looked for it, and found it, with my own indorse- ment on it of having answered it myself in the regular course of business ! And yet I had no recollection what- ever of the entire transaction. And I know that my experience in this is not unique. V^ou know it is "common," do you not ? And because it is so, because memory is such a tricky part of our mental 30 WALKS AND TALKS. furniture, I do not believe that it is wise to spend three- fourths of all the time in our schools in trying to " cram " i?t- We can use the time better in some other way. Don't you think so ? P. S. — After I had this chapter written I read it to a teacher, a friend of mine, and he said : "You are fighting a man of straw. They don't teach now-a-days as they did when you went to school." I said nothing, but as in the next six days I had the opportunity of being in as many different towns, I took the liberty of dropping into a couple of schools in each town to sec how they taught school t/ie^r. Then I came home and copied out the paper, just as I had written it, only I underscored some words that I had not thought it necessary to emphasize when I wrote the first copy. TO YOU On looking over the printed edition of the foregoing chapter I find that I made a capital blunder in the manu- script for the same — an error that I want to rectify here as far as I can. The last sentence in the article proper — the one that comes just before the " P. S." is a question, and it reads, *' Don't you think so?" That is the way I wrote it, and as a most natural consequence, that is the way it was printed. Nevertheless, as it stands, it does not begin to utter what I wanted it to say, nor express what I meant to put into it. What I ought to have done was to have underscored the word "you" in my copy, so that the printed edition would have read "Don't jjw/ think so?" That would have put a point upon all that had gone before, and per- haps made it penetrate at least one or two individual souls ^ TO YOU. 31 personally, pricking them up to veritable action in the premises; whereas, leaving the thing general, as I did, to apply to anybody or everybody (or more probably ;z^(^^^) the whole force of all I had said stands a good chance of coming to nothing — going out into empty space, and van- ishing into glittering generalities. Because, you see, it is only as what is written or said strikes jj/^z/, in especial, and takes hold of yo2i, and leads you to action, that it is worth while writing or saying any- thing at all. I mean really worth while. Of course, one may write merely for the sake of making marks on paper, or talk merely for the sake of wagging one's tongue, or one may read merely to kill time; but none of these things are really worth while, according to my way of thinking. Who is it that says, "I do not write these things for a dollar, nor to fill in the time while I wait for a boat?" Aye, truly! Neither does any man or woman who has come to realize that life is really worth living! And yet we are all so prone to let the things that would fain hit us hard, glance off, and be shivered into a million fragments of generalities, rather than suffer them to be focused to a needle-point fineness, and stick into our souls individually, and rankle there, piercin^f even to the dividing asunder of the joints and of the marrow, of the soul and of the body, if need be; goading us to action, whether we wish it or no; filling us with unrest until we do what the stern behest tells us we ought to do! I remember an old deacon in the church into which I was born, who said one evening at church meeting, when the brethren were discussing the merits and demerits of a new minister they were about to " call," and some one intimated that his sermons were not practical — that this old worthy remarked that he did not know or care a fig whether the sermons were practical or not; that he 32 WALKS AND TALKS. didn't think he should know a practical sermon if he ever heard one; that he liked a sermon as he liked a meal of victuals — all he asked of it was that it should go in one ear and out the other, and be good while it was going. He was a notorious old skinflint, one who would de- vour a widow's house with no more apparent feeling than as if he were killing a fly. Yet, he heard the Word, every Sunday; but there was wo personality in it for him, and the messages of truth and grace that fell from the preacher's lips simply " went in at one ear and came out at the other," so far as he was concerned, and they were "good while they were going" because they onl}^ applied to somebody else. I lost sight of the old fellow when I was a mere boy, and I do not know what finally became of him, but I have often thought what a rattling of dry bones there must have been in his case, if ever he came to a place where someone pointed a finger straight at him, and said, "Thou art the man," so that it stuck clear through him and came out on the other side. And yet I would have no harsh word for this rigid old Puritan, for we are all more or less apt to be like him, in that we are very willing to let the great lessons of life for us go by, while we shy along on the other side of the road. Nevertheless, the things that count for any of us, and the only things that really count, are those that we take personally to ourselves, and that sink so deep into us that they move us this way or that, for good or for ill, as the case may be. And so it is that I am anxious that what I write shall hit you, my dear reader, and move you to action, one way or the other. Not that I expect, or even hope that you will agree with me in all, or perhaps in any part, of what I say. I should be the veriest goose, not to say fool, to TO YOU, 33 ink such a result possible. And, indeed, for this I have ) care whatever. Of course, if what I have to say strikes you as true, and, doing-, stirs you up to action on the lines of what seems to ' to be right, then I am indeed glad. But if, reading any )rds of mine, your soul says, " No, he is wrong there, d I know it, for I have worked the thing through on my vn account, and I am as certain as I am that I am alive at he is in error " — if your soul says that to you, and you :t accordingly, and rise up in the might of truth and de- iolish every word that I have ever written — why then, so long as you have the ^;^^'f^,_^l ^T^^adlL ^ thank you, from the bottom of rn5||^8ea|;0|f cb bBi^SS^tlkl my error, and count you the ^ei^^a^dAi|^!|J^|jjhful/frf»ad I ever had. But to hdcw^my words fall flat onyoii, tdlhave to real- ize that, for jvA, they rneij^ ^^iiiiWine eyaknd out at the other, and arlLgood while they are gdfc^JTthis is worm- wood to me. ^^^laLiihSifi^U^M^'^ And so I wish I rSQ"#?Sl5i{-%ie question originally, *'Dontj/02i think so?" All of which leads me to the reflection that no man or woman in all this world amounts to much till he or she mes to realize what an important part of creation they, :h one, personally y are, viewed from their own individual ndpoint. And this, not in any offensively egotistical y, but merely as a matter of fact that arises from the y nature of things, in that every living human being is immortal soul, and as infinite as eternal! And so it is that, so far as you are concerned, no mat- wlio you are: " You are he or she for whom the earth is solid and liquid. " You are he or she for whom t^he sun and moon hang- in the sky. '* Whoever you are, motion and reflection are especially ioxyou. 3 f^ 34 WALKS AND TALKS. " Whoever you are, the divine ship, this wondrous world ot 6urs, sails the divine sea especially ioryou. '* For none more than yo:( are the present and the past. " And for none more tha.n you is immortality. " Each man to himself, and each woman to herself, is the word ^ of the past and present, and the word of immortality. " No one can acquire for another — not one! •' No one can grow for another — not one! " The song is to the singer, and comes back most to him. •' The teaching is to the teacher, and comes back most to him. '* The murder is to the murderer, and comes back most to him. *' The theft is to the thief, and comes back most to him, " The love is to the lover, and comes back most to him. " The gift is to the giver, and comes back most to him — it can- not fail. "The oration is to the orator, and the acting to the actot and actress, not to the audience. " And no man understands any greatness or goodness but his own, or the indications of his own. " I swear the earth shall surely be complete to him or her who shall be complete! " I swear the earth remains broken and jagged only to him or her who remains broken and jagged!" So says the latest prophet of the years, and tru/j/ he says it. One doesn't realize it at first flush. It is so great, so mighty, that j^o/^ and /can hardly understand that w^ are the ones, in particular, that the old man is talking about. And yet, so it is, and weknow it, when we come to think about it. Surely, so far as I am concerned, the sun and moon hang in the sky for me especially. Drop me out of the account, and what odds is it to me whether there be any sun, moon, or whatsoever? And so on, to the end of all the old poet's words claim for us. Now, il \9 this view of humanity that makes life worth living, for me. It is this infinite individuality and personality that is in you and in -ine, and in everybody (white, black, brown, or what you will), and which makes us all equals TO YOU, 35 on the great plane of spiritual being — it is this thing that makes it seem worth while for me, or for you, or for any- body to live at all, and to labor and strive to move our- selves and the rest of the brethren on and up. It is this that makes me willing to sit down and write to you, and that will make it worth while for yozc to read what I write, if I say anything worth reading at all. And, above all, it is this view of things that makes the public school worth while, and that puts the teacher's profession on the very topmost round of the ladder of human employments. And especially is this so in this great American democracy of ours, where we have under- taken to make the total average of humanity so high that to its hands can be safely entrusted the government of this mighty people,' the settlement of such gigantic ques- tions as time has never before produced, the development of a civilization that shall make all the former attainments of the nations of the earth sink into insignificance by way of contrast. This is what we have undertaken to do, and if the attempt ever succeeds, it must be because the public schools make such success possible. But if these schools ever perform the Herculean task that is demanded of them, it will be because they so adapt themselves to the million-and-one personalities of the chil- dren of this nation, that they enable them to grow and develop as God meant they should grow and develop, each and all, everyone just as free to think and act as yoii are — not to think and act as yoii do, but as each one per- sonally elects, after his own kind. And, if this thing is ever done, it \?, you who have got to do it, so far as yo2i are concerned ; it is /, it is everybody^ but each one in particular. And so the questions that force themselves upon you 36 WALKS AND TALKS. and upon me are, what can we do ? How can we do it ? And, above all, will we do something, right now ? Looking at the present status of the public schools, you know and /know that they are not now doing all that they should do, all that the requirements of the hour demand that they should do. We know that we do not hold the great bulk of the childreii of the common people in these schools but a small percentage oftlie time that these same chil- dreii ought to be under careful discipline a?td training. How can we hold these pupils longer, and train them as they ought to be trained ? Long years of the most careful ex- periment have proved that we cannot do it as our schools are now- fashioned, their curricula being what they now are. The question is, how can we do jt ? Or, what is far more to the point, how can you do it, beloved ? There's the rub. It is little or no odds to you and yours what the others do ; the item that should engage all your soul is, what can / do ? And what I beg for is, that yoti do something toward the solution of this momentous question in the special field in which you are working. I don't ask or urge you to do, cr to try, any- thing radical. I beseech you not to try to solve the whole problem for the whole nation at one fell swoop. I beg of you not to seek for any wholesale or patent process that can be applied to all the schools»in the country and instant relief be guaranteed to follow. From all these weaknesses of the flesh and wiles of the devil, good Lord deliver you — ■ and us. But this ] do suggest, that, things being as they are, you do what you can to better the situation in your immediate field of labor. Do that, in your own way, and great shall be your reward. Anent which, a letter has just this minute reached me, just as I wrote the last sentence in the last paragraph. It comes from a teacher in Kansas, and a portion of it reads TO YOlh 37 thus : " We teachers out here are struggling for more light on these great educational issues of the day. We are approaching these momentous problems cautiously, though fearlessly, and are bound to get at the true inward- ness of them, so far as it is in our power to do so. We may get great knots of egotism and self-confidence and fossilized adherence to antiquated ideas knocked off from our hide-bound anatomies; but, if so, we will gather together what there is left of ourselves, and push forward to grander and better things." There ! That is the idea ! It is just such a spirit as this that will break holes through all obscurities and let the light in, somehow. There will be mistakes made, of course there will ; but such a steadfast purpose as the above words indicate cannot fail of yielding great results as time goes on. Don't yoti think so ? One more remark and I am done with this theme. Don't you see how all this means that yoti have got to be the final judge as to what it is best to do under the present circumstances ? You may advise, and counsel, and read, and look up authorities, and watch what other people do, and all that; but if you ever do anything worth while for the cause, it will be in your oiv7i way — something that you have thought out yourself and are willing to try, because you believe there is something in it. It will be in vain for you to imitate what others have done. Imitation is never of any account. As Mr. Emer- on has it : " Imitation can never go above its level, and he imitator dooms himself to hopeless mediocrity from he very outset. The inventor did it because it was ; latural to him, but for any one else to do merely what he . las done, this is the veriest of slavish servitude, out of /hich nothing good can come." So don't imitate anything or anybody. It is written : 38 WALKS AND TALKS. " Thou shalt not make unto thee a graven image. Thou shalt not bow down to them, nor serve them, for I, the Lord thy God, am a jealous God ! " Yea, truly, it is so. So do not imitate. But this you can do. You can get ideas from here, and there, wherever you get a chance to forage ; and you can adapt these ideas, or ways and ineans, or what not, to your particular needs, and all this greatly to your advan- tage. It is Emerson who says again: '* No genius is so great that it can afford to dispense with the experience of others." This is gospel truth, but see to it that you do not merely imitate under the guise of availing yourself of the experience of others. Adapt everything ; adopt nothing ! That is the rule to work by, and it will bring the best of results ever and always. What I want to say is, that if you or I ever amount to anything on the tally-sheet of deeds in this world, it will be because we — *' Ordain ourselves, loosed of limits and imag-inary lines. " Going where we list — our own masters, total and absolute. " Listening to others, and considering well what they say. " Pausing, searching, receiving, contemplating — " Nevertheless, gently, but with undeniable will divesting our- selves of the holds that would hold us, and doing our own work in our own way, as God meant we should do it even from the first." Do this, my brother, my sister, zvhoevcr you are, and you shall be blessed of God. You may be cursed by men, but that will not count ; for the benediction of heaven shall overwhelm all else, and bring you the perfect peace and joy which the whole world else can not bestow, and which, thank God, all the world can never take away from you. Do you believe this ? And if you do, will you act in accordance with your belief ? You need not answer me ! Will you answer yourself? AlSf^aPEN BOOK, 39 This chapter is much more li'k^^ a'^^sertnon than, I intended it should be when I set out to put^t in omer; Nevertheless, the spirit said unto me, "Write!" and' I have written. AN OPEN BOOK. "Did you ever take a "Written Arithmetic" that has seen service, I don't care for how long, if only some one has "gone through" it one or more times, and, holding it up on its back between your two hands on the table before you, so that it stands perfectly perpendicular, suddenly release it, and notice where it will fall open? If you have never done this, suppose you try it, and perhaps it will put you on the track of something that you never thought of before. Now I am neither a prophet nor the son of a prophet, but just so surely as you make this experiment I can fore- tell where the pages will part. The book will fall open, invariably, at the "Miscellaneous Problems" at the end of fractions. I discovered this the other day while I was rumaging around in our attic, which is a sort of cemetery for dead books, whose graves it is a kind of melancholy pleasure to visit and linger over for a while, now and again, calling up old memories of this or that which these mummified pages once made a part of (what memories some of those yellow leaves do recall). I say, being thus engaged, I picked up a copy of Adams's old arithmetic (the first book of the kind that I ever sat up nights with), and as it accidentally slipped from my hand and fell upon the floor it opened as noted above. The pages that were exposed by this display were worn almost to shreds, and many of the 40 WALKS AND TALKS. problems were so begrimed with thumb-marks that they could scarcely be read, while the book, as a whole, was in a pretty fair state of preservation. As I stood for an instant gazing at these as-it-were- footprints from my own paleozoic age, I fell to wondering why the book happened to open just there (I always was curious about things), and then it occurred to me that perhaps other arithmetics might duplicate the act, under similar circumstances. So I turned to a row of arithmetical sarcophagi that stood on a shelf just before me (there was a long line of them, for some one has been going to school from our family most of the time for forty years, during a large share of which period those apostles of education, the school book agents, have been going about making changes and change wherever they went, and this row of mathe- matical coffins is the earnest of their faithful labors), and took down a copy of Greenleaf, which came next in order. I set the book on its back on the floor, holding it straight up with my hand, and then suddenly "let loose," and — there it was, just the same as its predecessor! Then I tried Davies. There was neither variation nor shadow of turning in the result! Then came Colburn, and Ray, and Robinson, and White, and a whole hecatomb of later fry, and in not a single instance did the sign fail. The demonstration was perfect, at least so far as our family was concerned. But, like a true scientist that I am, I remembered that one swallow doesn't make a summer, and it occurred to me that, perchance, this phenomenon might be a peculiar attachment of our family — so I set out to generalize from the individual concept, which had taken its initiative as above noted! I went into the cellar of a down-town book store, about AN OPEN BOOK. 41 a week after school began in the fall, and there 1 found a cord or more of "exchanged" arithmetics (books which, like Dead Sea fruit, had suddenly turned to ashes in the hands of the children, just as they were beginning to like them a little for old times' sake, if nothing else), and I took down a couple of dozen or so of these "back-num- bers," and began to try experiments with them. At first I picked up the books at random and tested them according to my theory, but presently it occurred to me that even this might not be a thoroughly infallible proof; for, without specially guarding the point, there was 2, possibility that all the books thus taken might belong to the children of some one nationality, and in these days of positive science, if a principle is worth its salt it must be established as world-wide in its application. And so I got the idea of making a Pan-average-Ameri- can-and-Foreign-born-school-child test of my hypothesis, and to this end I went through that pile of old paper and picked out books in which the following names were duly mscribed on the inside of the pasteboard covers (the "fly leaves" were missing in all the books I examined): Peter Brown, Solomon Isaacs, Patrick Murphy, Fritz Louten- heizer, Ignaccio Papionelli, Lars Larson, Ann Jones, Marie Chevalier, Jean McDonald, Topsy Johnson, Inez Dosa- mantes, and Catharine Trediakovitchiski, and with these I proceeded with my experimentation. ,■ The result confirmed my most sanguine expectations; / for, in every case, the openings were as before noted, and the pages exposed presented the same bedraggled and generally worn-out appearance that I had noticed in the first instance of the kind that came under my observation. * *In behalf of scientific inquiry* it is due that I state that, in the experiments above mentioned, Solomon Isaacs' book seemed possessed of a secret longing: to fall open at " Interest," while Topsy Johnson's evinced a disposition to open every- where at once, but on a fair trial they both yielded to the greater pressure, and did really fall apart as I have reported. 42 WALKS AND TALKS. And it is for these reasons that I feel justified in mak- ing the bold prophetic statement that occurs in the second paragraph of this chapter. I believe the fact to be verified, beyond question, that books such as I have described, treated as I have noted, will behave as I have herein said they would. And if this postulate is established, let us proceed to search for the cause of these remarkable phe- nomena — for such I certainly consider them to be. Here, then, is the problem: Why is it that there is such singularity of eventuation, resultant from a uniformity of actuation exerted upon certain similar books which have previously been subjected to an apparently incon- stant mode of manipulation? (As a scientist, I hold that, when dealing with scientific subjects, all the statements pertaining thereto should be couched in scientific terms). Now, pursuing this investigation on the line of modern methods of research (I am myself a devout disciple of Bacon, and believe thoroughly in inductive ways of arriv- ing at conclusions) the first thing to be done was to collect data from which, if possible, to establish a theory that should meet the requirements of the given proposition. With this fundamental principle as the guiding star of my action, I set out for our garret again, there to re- survey the field of my primary observations. On my way home I beguiled the weary horse-car half hour by reading an article on railroads in a current num- ber of one of the great monthlies, and there I came across this sentence: "The rails on a heavy grade will last less than half as long as those on a level stretch of road, for it is a uniform principle, that, where the greatest amount of friction is, there will be found the greatest amount of wear and tear." I am confident that it was the last three words in the sentence that threw my thought again into the channel of AJ^ OPEN BOOK. 43 my research; for it occurred to me, then and there, by tnai^ natural sequence of ideas with which all psychological' students are so familiar, that all the pages which had been disclosed in the books I had let fall open were literally covered (what there was left of them) with undeniable marks of both " wear and tear;" and from this point it was but a step to the conclusion that such record must have been produced by a "great amount of friction." Yea, verily ! With this hint I got into the top room of our house once more, and began to hunt for the friction-makers at this particular place in all arithmetics that I know any- thing about. And I found them, galore ! Hence this chapter. And, to make the case clear, I give herewith a few of the retarding elements that I found, though some of them were scarcely decipherable, owing to the great amount of friction that had been exerted upon them. I have taken them from the Miscellaneous-Problems-at-the-back-end of fractions of several arithmetics, and have tried to select them fairly, so as to truthfully represent the point I am driving at. Thus, I read through the grime: " In a certain orchard \ of the trees are peach, ^ are plum, f are cherry, and the remaining in are apple; how many trees in the orchard?" "A can do a piece of work in 9 days, B and C can do .t together in 5 days, and B can do | as much as C. How many days would it take them to do it, all working to- gether?" "The sum of two fractions is f, and their difference is -|; what are the fractions?" "A fish's head is 10 inches long, its tail is as long as its head and J its body, and its body is as long as its head and tail together; how long is the fish?" 44 WALKS AND TALKS. But I need not extenuate, nor would I set down aught in malice. To be sure, the problems I have given above are the worst worn of any I found, and in some cases the "tear" in them was so great that I had to supply the figures, but neither of these things in any way affects the argument. Vou know that problems, of which the above are but accentuated specimens, abound at this point in all written arithmetics. Vo2i know what a time you had with them when you went over them; and still better do you know, as a teacher, what a time you have had with every class you have tried to put through them — or them through your class ! If you grew up in a country school, you know that for winter after winter you sat in the back seat and scratched your head over these and similar problems; and if you were reared on the graded-school plan, you know that you labored on such examples night after night, and got all the folks in the house to help you solve them, and then did your best to remember Just /lozv tJie figures looked on your slate, so that you could reproduce them on exami- nation, if you had to! In either case it took weeks to get over the two or three pages of these puzzlers, and hence the " wear and tear " that your old book doth show. Now, the thing in all this that gives me pause is, how does it come about that arithmetic-makers put such prob- lems as these in this part of the book? When you look these examples steadily in the face, and probe into their true inwardness, you cannot help asking what business have they here, anyhow? And the only answer I can possibly imagine as coming from anybody is this, that they have fractions in them and so belong in /^<2/ department of arithmetic. But what an answer is this! So does the calculation of any one of the occupations of Jupiter's moons have AN OPEN BOOK, 45 fractions in it, but that can hardly be urged as a good and sufficient reason why such a problem should have a place in Miscellaneous Problems in fractions in arithmetic! And yet such an argument would be but a few degrees more flinty than the one which would place such problems as I have quoted in this part of our school arithmetics. The fact is that the fractional elements in these prob- lems are mere trifling affairs as compared with the princi- ples which the solution of these same problems involves. And as i6v these principles, when the pupil "tackles" tnese problems he has not been given one single word of instruction as to how to deal with them and their likes. For instance, take the first problem I have quoted. \thQ\ongs\.o 2i general class of problems in which several parts of a quantity are noted, and a definite number is announced as being equal to the remainder that is left wnen all these several parts are put together and this sum IS taken from the whole. But where, in his previous work, has the child come across anything even remotely resem- bling this? He has never been even so much as "expos- ed " tt3 such a situation. And all of the other problems I have quoted are open to the same criticism. Their solution demands a mastery of principles that belong to mathematics far in advance of the attainments of the pupils to whom such examples are given. And hence the friction. Talk about bricks without straw! An Israelite in Egypt with only a hand- ful of Nile reeds out of which to make his daily tale of adobe, was plethoric in resources as compared with the destitute mathematical condition of the hordes of gram- mar school children who are driven, head on, to these problems, the country over, every day in the week! But I would not care so much about that — I have no objection to having the children worked, and worked hard, 46 WALKS AND TALKS, in arithmetic; it is not about that, or anything like that, that I complain — but what I do rebel against is, the de- moralizing outcome of such a method of procedure. And that such is the result, you and I are living examples. These problems, and their Hkes, upset us, mathmetically, for many a day and year. They made guessers, and cut-and-try workers, and answer-huatersout of us. When they were put at us we didn't knou^ whether to add, or subtract, or multiply, or divide; and so wetriedl first one of these processes and then the other or perh^si all four at once; and when we had it "figured through,'"^ we hastened to turn back to see if we had the answer! Isn't that what these problems made us do, and do they not make your pupils do the same, even unto this day? Now, if there is anything that mathematics ought to teach it is definiteness of design, clear perception of pro- cedure, and certainty of results — in a word, absolute accu- racy should be the purpose of all .mathematical training. But the wrestling with problems like these, in the way we all have to — if they are given to us in our early teens and without a word of preparation for them — this tends to the very reverse of accuracy, and generates in us a looseness of thought and a dabbling with chances that drive us close into the realm of shams and pretense, not to say- lying, before we are aware. "What would I do about it?" I would cut everyone of those problems out of the arithmetics, where they occur — that is so far as giving them to pupils :s concerned. And then, when the boys and girls got so they could manipulate numbers well — could add, subtract, multiply, and divide whole numbers and fractions rapidly and accurately; when I was certain that they knew their mul- tiplication table so well that they didn't have to keep the Ai^ OPEN JBObK. 4? fore finger of their left hand in the book at that tabl^ \vhenever they were working problems, and could add without using their fingers for counters— when 1 was Surd they had passed that period, then 1 would take up § STUDY OF PROBLEMS, as sticli, and pursue the subject with them intelligently, systematically, and definitely^ till they mastered it. For instance, the first problem I have quoted beldrigs to a class of problems y as I have already said. I would take up, say, that class, or kind of problems, beginning with very simple ones, and teach my pupils to see what Was given, and hoW th^ same must be manipulated to find out what is required. For all problems of this particular kind are worked hi exactly the same ivay. And when my pupils had ''caught the idea," I Would improvise a hundred similar problems, all involving thi same principle and worked in the same way, making the numbers larger, and the complications more and more intricate as we went along. And I would teach them to recognize problems of this class, no matter where they stand in the arithmetic. Thus, there is no reason why this first problem should not have its fractional parts expressed as hundreths, and so find its place in decimal fractions, or percentage; but if a pupil had studied it as a problem^ he would smile on it under any form, and solve it accurately, every time. But without a study- of problems^ as such, when the like of this turns up in percentage it is a new thi?ig to the average student, something to sweat over and guess at, even as when it first appeared in another guise. But this chapter is already too long. I only add that everyone of these miscellaneous problems is capable of being relegated to its proper class and should be studied only in such company, and then by the batch. The-one- 48 WALKS AND TALKS. of-a-kind-and-every-kind-different hodge-podge of exam- ples that now makes up the part of arithmetic that always shows its dirty face when an old book of this sort is per- mitted to parade itself, is a monstrosity that ought to be banished from all healthy mathematical society. Won't yo?i help to shove it out into the rubbish pile, where it ought to have gone long ago; or, better still, won't you do what j/^?/ can to land it in a perdition which it amply deserves for having caused so much trouble in the world — and for having led so many primarily honest souls astray. AMONG THE AZTECS. Just as a preacher now-a-days, sometimes, after he has read his text, begins forthwith to explain to his con- gregation that the words he has read in their hearing do not mean at all what they have commonly been supposed to mean, but something entirely different ; that they include more and exclude less, etc., etc., so I proceed to remark to my " beloved readers" that the linc-with-a-slot- in-it, which has so kindly furnished me the theme for these disjointed papers, should not be too literally construed nor made too narrow in its application ; for it was my original intention that it should be liberal enough in its boundaries to permit my " Walks Abroad " to include also my rides. I make this remark for the sake of any literal critics who may happen to read these lines, lest, in what follows, they should insist that I could not have walked so far as I presently shall speak of going; and that, having misrepre- sented in one case, I am not to be believed in any. For AMONG THE AZTECS. 49 does not the law clearly say, falsus in uno falsus in omne ; and does not the challenging of the authority of law lead directly to anarchy, as the questioning of doctrine and dogma leads, head on, to infidelity ? These things must be looked after, or, as Mr. Dickens says, " the country is done for." How could we live without literal critics ? And so I state again, to make sure that there may be no danger of misunderstanding, that, true to the Hiber- nian instinct which has always been strong within me, when I say "walks" I mean "rides" ; that these terms are synonymous in my thought and mutually controvert- ible in my expression, and I shall do my very best to keep them equal in power and glory. And now, if we understand each other, we will go on. In one of my "walks abroad," the other day, I got as far away from home as the City of Mexico, and the things I saw while there are enough to fill the blank place in my line-of-the-missing-link for many and many a day. I think the thing that impressed me most during my stay in the old city was the fact that I found I knew so little about it before I got into it. And yet I studied my geography, all right and regular, and I find, on referring to my diploma (which I have looked up for this very nurpose, it being the first time I have had occasion to use since it was granted, twenty-five years ago), that my irk in this branch of learning for the term which eluded the study of Mexico was 96 ! Surely I must have known something about this igion once, or, in any event, I must have succeeded in laking my teacher think that I knew something of it, or, it least, in making her think that it would be a good thing 4 50 WALKS AND TALKS. to make Other people think that I knew — for the records were open to inspection, and my diploma is addressed, " To all the World, Greeting ! " But the truth is, I knew very little of Mexico as it is when first I set foot on her soil. As near as I can make out, what ideas I had of this country were gathered from the geography study which my diploma kindly preserves the memory and record of. As far as my own recollection of that epoch in my school life is concerned, I find a sort of a shadowy remembrance of some pretty tough lessons, near the back part of the book, where there were pictures of savages and heathen sparsely clad in hot weather clothes, and living in bamboo huts ; and, arranged around which pictures aforesaid, were certain strings of letters which were alleged to be the names of something, but which seemed to my boyish vision like a transcri[)t of zig-zag lightning with the kinks all left in. Witness IztaccihuatI, Huitzilopochtli, Acama- pitzin, Itztli, etc., etc. A page or two of that sort of thing musi have been a most delectable diet of mental pabulum to set a "maw- crammed and crop-full" boy down to, as, sleepily, he began to turn the pages before him about half an hour after school *' took up " after dinner ! The geography class always recited after dinner. I don't know why it was, but somehow geography always was an afternoon study. We read and did arithmetic in the morning, when we were fresh, but grammar and geography always came in the afternoon. Perhaps that is the reason I remember so little about these two studies, though my marks in both of them are very high. I was always a pretty good guesser, and I early learned that if a noun came after \\\q. word " is " it was in the *' nominative AMONG THE AZTECS. 51 case after " and not " objective after," and so my grammar marks were as good as those in geography. I have forgotten, though, how it happened that my geography marks were so good. But I know that they were good, for my diploma says so, and the figures on it are all made by a man who wrote a most beautiful hand. You ought to see those figures ! I hadn't seen them for twenty-five years till to-day, but truly they are beautiful ! " But, to return to our subject," as our dear pastor says. My friend. Prof. (fill it in to suit yourself, you all know him), who sits in his library reading this article, and who tells his children to "go and find mother and talk to her" if they happen to come into the room where he sits by himself, surrounded by his books, and reads, and reads, and reads, — remarks just here : " But why did he have to rely on the memory of the geography he learned at school for his knowledge of Mexico before he visited that country ? Has he, then, never read Prescott's ' Conquest of Mexico,' nor Brantz Mayer's ' History of the Mexican War,' nor Kings- borough's * Mexican Antiquities,' nor any of the classic authorities on this most interesting people and their habitat ? " To whom I reply . My dear sir, Ihave not read these books, not one of them. I wish I had, but, to be honest with you, I haven't. And if you want to know why I haven't, I beg to ex- plain that, up to the time I was of age I lived on a farm, mostly, where we got up before day-light the year round, and "hustled" from the hour when the "rosy-fingered Aurora appeared bringing back the dawn" till after supper, when we were too tired to do anything but go to bed. 52 WALKS AND TALKS. That is one reason why I didn't read these interesting books in the days of my youth, and another reason is, that our folks didn't have these books, nor many others, even if I had had time to read them. And I further respect- fully submit that, in this respect, I much resemble about 95 per cent, of the boys (and girls, too, for that matter) who attend our public schools! To be sure, these do not all grow up on farms, but they do live in homes where there is no plenitude of wealth ; where all the household has to work hard at manual labor for a living, and where there are few books on Mexico or any other country. That is how it happens that I was forced " to rely on the memory of the geography I learned at school for my knowledge of Mexico before I went there," and why there are several millions of people in this dear land of ours who would be obliged to do the same thing, should they take the "walk abroad" which I have recently taken. This shows why we ought to have pretty good ge- ographies in our schools. But to return once more to our subject. I was surprised to find that one of the things I did not know about the City of Mexico was what a perfectly delightful climate it has. I don't remember one word about '* climate " in the geography, unless it might have been ** mild and salubrious." But those words are of no manner of account in giving one an idea of the climate of Mexico City. They can't begin to do the subject jus- tice. Let me tell you a thing or two, and then see if you think they are equal to the emergency. We got into the City of Mexico about the middle of January, and we left it the first of March, and if we saw a cloud in the sky bigger than Barnum's circus tent during all that time, I have forgotten it. Six weeks of sunshine AMONG THE AZTECS. ^ without a break ! And I was told by perfectly reliable parties that it had been just that way ever since the first of October, and that that was the regular thing, every year, infallibly. That is to say, from October to March it never rains in Mexico City. The sun shines continually (I mean by day, dear literal critic) for more than five months in the year, and umbrellas can go to the pawnshop all that time, so far as rainy weather is concerned. In early April the rains begin, and they come decently and in order. In the first place, they always come in the afternoon. It never rains in the morning in Mexico City. The showers come at about five o'clock in the afternoon, and they are generally over by seven. Sometimes they last till into the night, but not often. The mornings are always bright, and a fellow always has a fair chance to get his work done, every day, before the rain begins. During June, July and August, it rains every day, from five to seven p. m., and no postponements on account of the weather. By October 1st the rains are over, and they can be absolutely relied upon not to show up again till the following April. Now, that is what I call a good weather programme, so far as the hydraulic part of it is concerned. As to the heat, that is equally satisfactory. The mean temperature for the year is 65 degrees Fahrenheit. The hottest month is May, when the thermometer sometimes reaches 85 degrees. The coldest month is August, when the mercury gets as low as 50 degrees. During our stay, from January to March, the hottest weather we saw was 75 degrees, and the coldest 55 degrees. Can " mild and salubrious " do justice to such a Climate as that ? I wonder, too, if these facts had been 54 WALKS AND TALKS. noted in my geography if I should not have remembered them, whether I got 96 or not. But I must draw rein, for, once on this subject of the climate of Mexico City, I shall write on to the end of the book if I don't put a limit on myself. And even then I could not tell of a/lits charms. How the farmers have six rainless months in which to gather their crops, and no harm to fear for their grain. How they have more than four months to plant in, and yet their crops all come up together and get ripe together ; because, you see, about the first of December the ground gets so dry that grain will not sprout in it, even though it is planted, but will lie there, safe and sound, till the rains come, and then all come up at once, and grow evenly, and get ripe evenly. Oh, there are a thousand things to tell, just about l/iis, but " time and space forbid." That is not the way my geography lesson about Mexico ended. I wish it had been. Because, then, I might have been so much interested in what I learned about that country in school that 1 should have read about it in " Classic Authorities " when I got where I could. THE SCHOOLS OF MEXICO. 55 THE SCHOOLS OF MEXICO. I came across a good many other things not set down in geography, during my ** walks abroad " in that so-near- and-yet-so-far sister Republic, and there are not a few of them, of an educational nature, which seems to me worthy of mention in this record. In the first place, as we were on our way down to Vera Cruz, I happened, by one of those fortunate accidents which every now and then will come to even the most un/ucky of mortals, to make the acquaintance of a gentle- man who, above all others, could give me the ''inside track," so to speak, that led to the very " upper walks " in Mexican education circles. This was none other than SeJior Sandoval, of the state of Zacatecas, the man who was chairman of the committee appointed by President Diaz to determine the nature and extent of the educa- tional exhibit which the Republic of Mexico made at the World's Fair, in Chicago. It was a little curious, too, how I happened to " locate " this most excellent and worthy Mexican scholar, teacher, and above all, gentleman. Our train had stopped in the " bush " (for we were down in the low country) for some unexplained reason, and everybody was curious to know the "why" of this unexpected phenomenon. Windows went up all along the cars, on both sides of the train, and as many heads were thrust out through them as though the geography of the event were Massachusetts instead of the '* terra caliente " of old, and reputedly incurious Mexico. Strange, isn't it, how, the world over, we all flatter 56 WALKS AND TALKS. ourselves that we are the only ones who do this or that; till presently, walking abroad, we find everybody doing the very thing we thought we had a corner on? The Mexi- cans on that train were as curious a lot of men and women as though they had been born under the shadow of Bunker Hill Monument. But, as I was saying, when the train stopped, a very urbane Mexican gentleman got up from his seat behind mc, and stood in the aisle, just beside me, looking out to see what he could see. In his hand he held a book; and, as he leaned over, I trained enough of my newly acquired Spanish into line to make out that the volume was none other than Mr. Herbert Spencer's Essay on " Education," translated into Spanish, and published by those worthy bookmakers, D. Appleton & Co. of New York. Now, experience has taught me that the books a man reads are a far better index to his character than a whole carload of certificates, recommendations and diplomas on the same point; and as soon as I saw this book in the hands of this gentleman, I felt, instinctively, that I had found a friend, if only I knew enough to speak with him in ^is native tongue. Great was my delight, therefore, when, a moment later, I discovered that, although I was unable to speak Spanish with this gentleman he was thoroughly prepared to speak English with me; for, turning to me, he asked a question in words and tone that even " Fair Harvard " might not have been ashamed of. To this I made reply to the best of my ability, and a few minutes later we were chatting together just as easily as if we had grown up in the same door yard, instead of having been born several thousand miles apart, one a native Mexican, and the other just as native a Yankee. It was the books we had read that thus brought us together. It is always so. THE SCHOOLS OF MEXICO. 57 As our conversation progressed, I soon found that my newly acquired acquaintance was exceedingly well posted on educational topics, both ancient and modern, foreign and domestic; and I judged him to have been the very man for the place, in mapping out the matter and manner of the Mexican educational exhibit, in Chicago. He gave a brief outline of what he had done, out I was specially anxious to hear from him, direct, as to the present status of education in the Republic. On this sub- ject he was, of course, well prepared to speak, and he gave me much interesting and valuable information regarding the same; but, what was infinitely better, he gave me a chance to see for myself, by telling me where I could find the best schools in Mexico, and by giving me letters of introduction which I found to be limitless pass- ♦^orts into the very heart of Mexico's educational 400. For the very acme of courtesy and genuine good fellowship, commend me to a Mexican gentleman and scholar of the type of Senor Sandoval. What a pleasure it is to know that there are the best of good men, all over the earth. Being thus introduced, the school I saw the most of was the National Normal School, located in the Ciiy of Mexico, of which Sefior Serrano is Director General. Regarding this school, let me say, first, that it is the special pet of President Diaz, who has done everything for it that money and an enthusiastic friend could do. This peer among the greatest of modern statesmen is thoroughly a nineteenth century man, and he believes that the thing above all others that Mexico needs, just now, is a public school system that shall educate all her people; and, as a first step in that direction, he has built up this National Normal School which is intended to prepare teachers for their work in the schools of the Republic. 58 WALKS AND TALKS. How well he has succeeded in making the materialization of his plan tally with his ideal may be gathered, in part, from what follows. The school is compose of two divisions, one for young men and the other for young women, the practice of co- education of the sexes not having reached Mexico. These different divisions occupy separate buildings, which are several blocks apart; and, as a matter of fact, are as inde- pendent of each other as though they had not a common aim. I visited only the school for young men, and all I have to say is about that branch of the institution. I found, upon inquiry, that, while President Diaz fully believes in the co-education of the sexes, yet he does not deem it wise to attempt such a measure in a country where prejudice is so deeply rooted and so strongly set against it. Indeed, the prudent policy of this man, not only in this, but in a hundred other matters, commanded my profoundest respect, the more I learned of him and his doings in the last twenty years. He is a man among men who really believes that Rome was not made in a day, and who has the patience and good sense to regulate his actions accordingly. If he lives twenty years longer, and remains at the head of affairs in Mexico during that period, he will have Mexican boys and girls learning their lessons seated in the same school-room; but if he ever does bring about such a state of things, it will be because he has head enough not to be in too big a hurry about it! I wonder if it would be possible for some of our "get-there" Americans to learn anything from this patient and business-like head of the Mexican Republic. The building occupied by the young men's depart- ment of this school is located near the Palace buildings, just a little off from the Zocalo, or chief square of the city. THE SCHOOLS OF MEXICO. 50 It is a two story structure, and built around the four sides of a central square, ox patio, after the manner of all Mexi- can buildings. When Diaz came into power this building was an old monastery; but, in common with hundreds of similar structures, it was confiscated by the republic, and is now state, rather than church property. And may I stop, just here, to say that the church and the state are most thoroughly divorced from each other in modern Mexico, under the rule of Diaz. This separa- tion is carried to such an extent that no religious exercises whatever are permitted in connection with any state affairs; nor is a priest, or a nun or a protestant minister, or even a " Y. M. C. A. young man " allowed to go upon the street clad in garments that in any way indicate his or her relations to religion or the church — any church. On the street, all men are alike, in that they are then simply citizens of the Republic. In their homes, or in their churches, they may dress as they please and do as they will, provided they keep within bounds; but in public, their peculiar creeds or whatnot peccadillos must not be flaunted in the faces of their neighbors. Any church — all churches, per se, receive the fullest protection from the Mexican government. A Mormon or a Hotentot can go there and worship according to the dictates of his own conscience, and the whole power of the Mexican government is behind him as a guarantee that he shall in no way be molested or made afraid, so long as he " keeps out of politics; " but let any church or religious organization, as such, begin to meddle with state affairs, and somebody is exceedingly liable to be in states'- prison, forthwith. Curious, some of the ways they have in Mexico! The building fronts on a well kept street, and is built flush to the side walk. Its only entrance or exit is a wide 60 WALKS AND TALKS. door which is in the middle of the building, on the street side, and there is ahvays a poi^tero, or guard, on duty there. Every pupil and teacher has to pass this guard in going in or out; and an accurate record is kept of the presence or absence of everybody connected with the school, during school hours. This record is preserved, and is open to inspection, to all parties concerned, at any and all times. In this and some other respects there is a rigorous military discipline in the management of this school. I found Senor Serrano, the president of the institution, to whom I presented my letter of introduction, a most gracious and affable gentleman. He is about sixty-five years old, and has "seen service," as nearly every promi- nent Mexican has who has reached that age and has had anything to do with public affairs. He was for many years a successful lawyer, and was called to his present position on account of his rare executive ability. He was director in chief of the Mexican exhibit in Chicago and spent most of his time in that city during the progress of the Fair. I found him dictating a letter to Mrs. Potter Palmer on some point connected with the exhibit he had charge of, and m which she was also interested, and if that lady ever receives a more dignified, gracious and diplo- matic epistle than that same letter, like the author of John Gilpin, "may I be there to see." My letter of introduction was a " sesame open " to the school and all that pertained thereto, and I spent some two days in going about the institution, which is, in many respects, much like a normal school in "the states; "but which has a number of things, that, like somebody's sarsaparilla, are "peculiar to itself." There are about two hundred young men in the school preparing to teach. The course covers four years, THE SCHOOLS OF MEXICO, 61 and is considerably more extended than that of any other normal school with which I am acquainted. It differs from our normal school course in that it has more lan- guage study than our schools insist on. Of these lan- guages, Latin, French, German and English (and of course Spanish), all have prominent places ; but it struck me as a significant fact that English is the one language, besides Spanish, the study of which is made compulsory. Most of the teachers in the school speak English, and all of them are busy studying that language. Sefior Serrano himself had never learned the English language though he speaks Spanish, French, and German; but the fact that he was to go to Chicago made him, as he said to me, " ashamed to go to a country the language of which he should be unable to speak," and so at sixty-five, he was learning English! And admirably he was progressing, too, as his conver- sation showed, though he had been at work on it less than two months when I met him. As I compared my six weeks old Spanish with his English, which was but two weeks its senior, I was fain to hide my head and exclaim, " O, wretched man that I am, how can I catch the trick of learning a foreign language to equal this charming old gentleman ! " But from what I saw of Mexican students they are much quicker in learning a foreign language than our American students are. Indeed, the '^ cultured classes " in Mexico are much more proficient in speaking lan- guages other than their mother tongue than are a cor- responding set of people in the states. It is a rare thing to meet a scholarly person in the City of Mexico who does not speak more than one language, while it is not uncommon to meet men and women who will converse fluently in eithci Spanish, French, English, or German. 62 WALKS AND TALKS. From what I observed, I think this is due partly to a natural bent of mind, suited to language study, which the Mexicans possess; but, perhaps more than this it comes from the natural methods of teaching a foreign language which are used in the Mexican schools. These are largely inductive, and consist in making pupils actually talk the language they are studying, rather than merely teaching them rules about how to talk if they ever get so they can! The signs of the times begin to indicate that similar methods will, before long, be largely used in the study of foreign languages in our own schools; and when they are, perhaps our children will show up as well in thic branch of learning as the Mexican children do now. MEXICAN CLASS-ROOM WORK. As a workman is known by his chips, so is a school known by the pupils it turns out. This is universally true, but I make a special application of the principle in the case of the National Normal School, of the City of Mexico. And, so far as Normal Schools are concerned, expe- rience leads me to believe that the place to look for its "chips" is in the "model school," or "training depart- ment" of these institutions. The students of the normal schools proper become mere repositories, or storage bat- teries, as it were, of the theories and arts of the professors under whom they learn their trade. But in the training department one gets a view of ultimates — of the way in which these theories and arts *' pan out," as a cold and heartless money-making man-o'-the-world would say. Being aware of this fact, I spent small time in view- ing the elegant laboratories and other mechanical appli- MEXICAN CLASS-BOOM WORK. 63 ances for making teachers with which this institution is so thoroughly equipped. All these are worth while, doubtless; but I felt as though I would be willing to "infer" considerable along these lines, if only I could get my eye on the "finished product" of the concern. And so I made straight for the model school, being once fairly in possession of car/e blanche to the institution. I found a school of nearly three hundred pupils, of all grades, from the primary up to the " higher branches," as in such cases made and provided. The school was well organized, and the greatest of care was exercised not to permit the crude efforts of "pupil teachers" to result harmfully upon the innocents on whom they " practiced." This was a thing that pleased me greatly, because I have known instances where it was not done, and where the children who were worked upon by these "'prentice hands" — -the chips — -were terribly chopped up by the performance. I know a young man to-day who cannot read a page in a magazine aloud, decently, but who can " elocute " any- thing he has learned by heart in a most charming manner; and all because, when he learned to read, in the training department of a normal school, under a pupil teacher who was let loose upon him without a chaperone, he was made to rehearse the same reading lessons over, and over, and over again, so that he could ''read them elegantly with- out looking at his booky as his teacher used artlessly to say, when his class came up for examination before the whole school. You see, this pupil teacher was marked on the work she did with this class, and the proof of her work was a show performance of her reading class before the whole school. And what so good a show as a nice, clean class ot little folks, all dressed in their best clothes, standing 64 WALKS AND TALKS. in a row, reading, oh so charmingly, from books held in the left hand, and which they didnt have to look at at all? And this was called teaching reading. The woman who did this thing told me, recently, that, now she has come to realize the enormity of her work with that class, she has never dared even to pray for for- giveness; and whenever she meets one of the pupils whom she so ignorantly abused, she is fain to call on the rocks and mountains to fall upon her! Perhaps her "punishment to fit her crime" may some time be to sit for ages and ages, and be compelled to listen to the stumblings and haltings of persons whose instruction in this branch of learning has been elocu- tionary drill to the neglect of sight reading! But then, in all professions it is apt to be pretty hard on the patients of the ones who are learning the trade. Who was that celebrated surgeon that performed a very delicate and critical operation upon a lady's eye, and v/ho, being complimented on his marvelous skill, replied: '* Oh, but you should see the bushels of eyes I ruined while learning*to be so skillful ! " And so I was glad to find the greatest of care in the supervision of the pupil teachers in this school. As I have already said, the course is four years, and the normal students are not permitted to teach at all in the training department until the last half of the second year; and it is not until the fourth year that they are per- mitted to have entire charge of a class, and hear recita- tions unattended by some professor of the school. This guards the danger very well; and, judging from what I saw, reduces the evil well toward the vanishing point. ) But some of the ways of this school are things to smile at, from our point of vision. For inst^-nce, in most of the rooms I visited in the training department, where MEXICAN CLASS-ROOM WOBK, 65 recitations were going on, the teacher was smoking his cigarette as he heard the boys recite; and, not to distract his attention too much from his work, he had one of the boys of the school standing near at hand, whose business it was to " scratch a match " for him whenever his cigarette went out, or he wished to light a fresh one. To perform this service for the teacher was a great honor rather than a disgrace, and in some of the rooms, at least, I learned that it was the special prerogative of the best boy in the school to thus be a torch bearer for his chief. It was also interesting to me how this position of best-boyship was determined in some of the rooms. I do not know how general the method is, but this was the modus operandi in at least one room I visited: The teacher gives the pupils, from time to time, and for various credits, bits of paper called vales, much like " rewards of merits " that we used to get " in the old days when I was young." Now when a boy becomes the law- ful possessor of a number of these vales, they are his, to do with as he pleases; and here is what he pleases to do with them: Everybody gambles in Mexico, and the boy who aspires to become the best boy in school resorts to this practice to gain the coveted position. And this is the way of it: If he happens to be a clever reader, for instance, he will challenge some member of his class to a reading match, each party to the contest to " put up " an agreed number of vales to "come into the game," as it were, and then they "read for the pile !" The teacher is also made particeps criminis, and to him is given the position of umpire, or referee; though upon this condition, that, if both boys succeed in reading the 5 66 WALKS AND TALKS. lesson perfectly, then the teacher must give to each of them a number of vales equal to the total number they have both together risked. If one boy trips, and the other does not, then the successful one "wins the pile;" '/vhile if both fail, the teacher " rakes in the stakes." In this way the position of best-boy-in-the-school is striven for, and in this way only can it be won, for the boy who has the greatest number of vales at the end of each month is the best boy in school ! But, once won, like other high positions which are gained by equally creditable means in more countries than Mexico, great is the power and glory thereof. For, not only can the best boy in school light cigarettes for his teacher, but he becomes the monitor of the school room when the teacher is hearing recitations. And so, between match scratchings the best boy patrols the aisles of the school room, calling the other boys to order, here and there as occasion requires, and recording in the note book, which the teacher furnishes him for such purpose, the delinquencies and shortcomings of any who fail to heed his warnings and exhortations to correct behavior. And from the record he makes there is no appeal. The teacher will sustain it, every time, as why should he not, for is it not the handiwork of the best boy in school ! Another perquisite of this high office of best boy is, that at the end of every month he is given all the tops, marbles, balls, knives, kite-strings, and whatsoever that the teacher or monitor has taken away from bad boys during the four weeks previous. How different all this is from what we are used to here in the states. In this civilized land our teachers talk to the children aboui virtue being its own reward, and other unattractive maxims of similar import. But what MEXICAN CLASS-BOOM WOEK. 67 inducements are these to make one strive for the position oi best boy in school ; and who can tell what might be, even here, if a conglomorate pile of tops, and balls, and marbles, and kite-strings, and whatsoever were held before the eager eyes of our children as the prize to be awarded at the end of every month to the fellow who could win the most va/es from his schoolmates and teacher? And then think of the emoluments of ofifice that would rise to one's vision under such circumstances. Once installed as monitor, with autocratic power, what job lots oi tops and balls, etc., one might confiscate from the bad boys, in the full assurance that they would be placed where they would do the most good at the end of the month ! If that school does not turn out a full quota of Quays, or Wanamakers, or Brices, or Jay Goulds, one of these days, then shall I loose my faith in the power of e