_^ ft" c ^ d O cj c • <£ cO " cc «£fiC^ «L-C Je^ o«ogc: (CCC ccr ^kit*^ s «rc<:<: <2: ') the sounds — The phenomena attending depression are variable — Description of their development, generally from the fourth day. A. Impulse: — Possible sources of error in diagnosis: (1) constitutionally feeble impulse, (2) emphysema of lungs — Necessity for comparison of condition of heart from day to day — Peculiar modification of impulse in certain cases — Vermicular action — Effect of position on impulse of heart — Loss of impulse generally progressive, sometimes rapid — " Where differential diagnosis is diffi- cult or impossible it is often unnecessary as a guide to immediate practice" — Retrocession of the local malady is gradual. B. Sounds: — First phase of lesion: second sound becomes relatively, but not positively, augmented. Second phase; disappearance of first sound. Third phase: disappearance of both sounds (a condition of most unhopeful augury) — Foetal character of the sounds in some cases — Speculations as to failure of second sound — Loss of impulse and failure of sounds generally advance pari passu, but not invariably so — As failure of sounds begins at the left side, so in recovery the phenomena follow the inverse course ...... 121 LECTURE XVII. The Heart in Fever, continued — Post-mortem appearances in extreme typhous soft- ening — This affection not followed by chronic disease of the heart — Periods of invasion and of retrocession — Diagnosis of actual softening depends on (1) the character of the fever, and (2) the presistence of physical signs of failure of the heart — Simultaneous lessening of both sounds (foetal heart) — Its bearing on the treatment by stimulants — Slowness of pulse in convalescence from typhous softening — Analogy to fatty degeneration of heart with slow pulse — In latter case the phenomenon, however, is constant — Occasional reversal of the order in which the signs of typhous softening show themselves — Prognosis more favourable with depressed than with excited heart — Former condition is more amenable to treatment — Report on an epidemic of typhus at Stockholm in 1841, by Professor Huss — Cardiac murmurs in fever, especially in advanced stages of typhoid and relapsing fever are generally basic and systolic functional in character, and occasionally accompanied by veuous murmurs in the neck — Difficulty of distinguishing the first and second sounds of the heart in certain cases of disease: (1) chronic bronchitis, with weak and irregular heart and congested liver: (2) late stages of some forms of fever — Example of the latter — Diagnosis drawn from a want of accordance in the symptoms . . .117 LECTURE XVIII. Secondary Intestinal Complications of Fever — General and introductory remarks — A generic resemblance between the various forms of fever — Secondary abdo- minal complications are more frequently observed in typhoid fever, but do not exist as its necessary anatomical character — Dothinenteritis was largely pre- valent in the typhus epidemic of 1826-28 — Fever must be observed independ- ently in each epidemic and in every country — Typhoid fever almost without characteristics symptoms — Illustrative case ; extensive intestinal ulcerations found after death — Vital symptoms of intestinal complication: (1) thirst, (2) swelling of belly, (3) diarrhoea, (4) ileo-csecal tenderness, (5) increased action of abdominal aorta, (ti) rigidity of adbominal muscles — Three forms of abdo- minal swelling: (1) early and moderate tympany, (2) doughy condition, (3) slight ascites — Increased action of abdominal aorta — Case of, in perforation of the stomach— Analogous local arterial excitement in (1) whitlow, (2) rheuma- tism — Diagnosis from aneurism — Intestinal complications seem to interfere largely with action of the law of periodicity — Early elevation of local irrita- tion checks deposit, and so prevents future mischief — Hence relief of symptoms by early depletion as practised by Broussais, who misinterpreted the matter, and was led to look upon the general fever as but symptomatic of a local lesion 135 CONTENTS. Xlll LECTURE XIX. PAGE Intestinal Complications of Fever, continued — They resemble all the other secon- dary affections of fever in their general characteristics and relations to the primary essential malady — More frequent in typhoid, but occurring in typhus also, as, for example, in the epidemic of 1826-27 — Pathological appearances observed in the intestinal tract in fever — Yet these appearances were not neces- sarily found after death even where severe abdominal symptoms existed in life — Eruption of rose spots in fever ....... . . 142 LECTURE XX. Intestinal Complications of Fever, continued — Division into three categories, with reference to the vital symptoms: I. These symptoms are absent, although the silent disease may be great in amount ; II. Local symptoms are evident; III. Symptoms and pathological changes are both well marked — Further description of the epidemic of 1826-27 — Sudden access of intense abdominal pain, followed by icterus and gangrene — Fatality of this complication — Splenic(?) abscess oc- curring in the first case of recovery, and discharging through the lung — Resem- blance of this form of fever to the yellow fever of the tropics — Dr Lawrence's observations — Dr. Graves' observations 146 LECTURE XXI. Intestinal Complications of Fever, continued — Organic changes — Perforation of intestine — Of common occurrence in 1826-29: (1) Generally rapidly followed by symptoms of peritonitis; (2) but may be unattended by local symptoms in progressive cases, or again may induce only limited peritonitis (adhesions) ; (3) Symptoms of perforation may be veiled by the coexistence of intense irritation in another cavity of the body — Illustrative case — Time of occurrence of perfora- tion as observed in six cases — Diagnosis of internal solutions of continuity is based on sudden development, without apparent exciting cause, of new, local, violent, and often rapidly fatal symptoms — Cases to which this rule of diag- nosis is applicable — In effusion into a serous sac the degree of resulting inflam- mation is determined chiefly by the quality of the effused fluid — Examples — Influence of an irruption of pus in producing serous inflammation contrasted with that of an irruption of blood — Physiological difference between pus cor- puscle and white-blood cell — The formation of conservative adhesions seems to be rarer in peritonitis than in pleuritis— Case of hepatic abscess in which adhe- sions occurred and recovery followed (diagnosis from abdominal aneurism) . 151 LECTURE XXII. Secondary Nervous or Cerebro-Spinal Complications of Fever — When they predominate, prognosis is unfavourable — Of all secondary typhous affections they are least connected with organic change — Probable reason ; mucous mem- branes and skin undergo anatomical change more readily than serous mem- branes — Cerebral inflammation rarely observed in fever — Purpuric fever of 1867 an exception — Absence of organic change in typhous cerebral derange- ment does not lessen its importance as regards prognosis and treatment — Inadmissibility of routine treatment, either antiphlogistic or by stimulation, in fever — Results obtained by Louis as to relation between head symptoms and pathological change in fever — Actual cercbritis, when it does occur in fever, is a tertiary phenomenon — Dr. Hudson's cases — Study of analogies is of impor- tance in essential diseases ; thus relief of headache in early stage of smallpox by leeching is analogous to good results of moderate depletion in early stages of some cases of fever — Further examples of the effect of lessening vascular supply in controlling development of smallpox eruption — Analogy in case of secondary affections of fever — Nervous symptoms arise from three conditions: (1 ) influence of fever-poison, (2) urtcmia, (3) specific secondary inflammation, probably erysipelatous in character . . . . . . . .159 XIV CONTENTS. LECTURE XXIII. PAGE Nervous Complications of Fever, continued — Cerebrospinal fever — Phenomena of fever inconstant and variable, except, perhaps, the phenomenon of increased temperature — Type of fever also varies in different epidemics — Two examples: (1) yellow fever of 1826-27, (2) malignant purpuric, or cerebrospinal fever of 1867 — Dr. E. W. Collins' report on latter — There exists a "constitutional ele- ment" in the disease, so that the cerebro-spinal arachnitis can hardly be held to be a primary, idiopathic affection — Evidences of essentiality from presence of other phenomena in connection with the skin, etc. — Reports to the Medical Society of the King and Queen's College of Physicians in Ireland on the epidemic of 1867 — Inconstancy and variability of the symptoms in the outbreak — Dr. H. Kennedy's views — Symptoms of the disease — Petechise — Early setting in of putrefaction — Retraction of head; sometimes persistent after disappearance of other local and general symptoms, and sometimes persistent after death — Recapitulation: Points to be considered in connection with epidemic of 1867: (1) yellow fever of 1826-27, (2) cerebro-spinal arachnitis of 1846 (Dr. Mayne), (3) coincidence of cases of malignant measles in 1867, and (4) hemorrhagic and purpuric smallpox in epidemic of 1871-72 ...... 165 LECTURE XXIV. Nervous Complications of Fever, continued — Hysteria — Occurrence of hysteria, especially at an early stage, of unfavourable import — View that hysteria is always symptomatic of uterine excitement is quite erroneous — Nymphomania only a loeal and accidental manifestation — Hysteria is observed in males as well as in females in fever — Case of erotic symptoms in typhoid fever occur- ring in a young girl, reported by Dr. A. W. Foot — In early stage of fever hys- teria generally is the precursor of severe nervous symptoms — Its appearance may lead to serious complications later in the disease — Illustrative cases — Hysterical symptoms are sometimes connected with actual or organic disease, especially in acute affections — Dr. Cheyne's observation : Hysteria a ground for a good prognosis in every disease, fever alone excepted — Outbreak of hysteria, affect- ing the abdomen, in female fever ward of Meath Hospital — Anomalous symp- toms in advanced stages of fever often due to hysterical state — Case of typhous hysteria in the male followed by cerebritis 173 PART II. TREATMENT OF FEVER. LECTURE XXV. Introductory Remarks— Principles on which the treatment of fever is to be based — True meaning of the word empiric. Historical retrospect — The Symptomolo- gical, the Anatomical, the Rational or Eclectic Schools — Essence of fever cannot be determined by pathological anatomy — Etiology of fever is indefinite . . 177 LECTURE XXVI. No specific line of treatment — Respect to be had (1) to the essential disease, (2) to its local and secondary effects — Failure of specifics in early stage of fevers — Want of success in the endeavour to found a science of therapeutics on experi- mental physiology or pathology — Effects of the action of the law of periodicity wrongly attributed to the adoption of therapeutical measures — Sustenance by food and stimulants — Two sources of danger to the fever patient: (1) primary effects of the fever poison in causing depression, (2) supervention of secondary local disease — Views of Dr. Graves on the subject of giving food in fever . 185 CONTENTS. XV LECTURE XXVII. PA8E Stimulants in Fever — Views as to the nutrient properties of stimulants are to be received with caution — Anticipatvie use of stimulants — Meaning of the term — Considerations to be taken into account in resolving upon this method of treat- ment : (1) prevailing epidemic character of the disease, (2) previous condition of the patient — " Sinking of vital power" — Illustrative case — Stimulation often unsuccessful in the intemperate, and in those whose brains are over-worked, (3) development of symptoms of severe typhus, (4) development of fever odour — Contrast between typhus and typhoid as regards period at which stimulation is called for — Condition of the heart, a guide — Physical signs of cardiac weaken- ing 193 LECTURE XXVIII. Stimulants in Fever, continued — Signs in connection with the heart of the agree- ment of stimulants: (1) return of impulse, (2) return of first sound, (3) gradual fall in the rate of the pulse — In cases of "foetal heart" great boldness in stimulation is needed — No certain rules as to quantity of wine and whiskey or brandy required — Examples of free use of stimulants in malignant typhus — Case of Hardcastle (typhoid fever) — Eruption of vesicles as a secondary com- plication — Bed-sores ..... ...... 201 LECTURE XXIX. Stimulants in Fever, continued — Case of Hardcastle, continued — Treatment by food and stimulants in extreme cases — Presence of cerebral symptoms to a great extent unfavourable to the exhibition of stimulants — Necessity for daily observation to the effects of the treatment in each case — Signs of disagreement of stimulants — Routine practice is in every instance to be deprecated — Falla- cies of the numerical system in therapeutics — History of routinism — Its results — Description of routinism in the treatment of fever ..... 212 LECTURE XXX. Treatment of the Local Secondary Affections in Fever — Relative importance of these affections as regards prognosis — Bronchial Affection — Necessity for administration of stimulants and nourishment — Danger of exhibition of tartar emetic — Failure of emetics — Turpentine-punch — Dry-cupping, poulticing, blis- tering — Internal remedies: bark, ammonia, spirit of chloroform, turpentine — Acute Consolidation of the Lung — Its three forms — Treatment of the first form by dry-cupping, blisters, quinine, turpentine, and wine — Of the second form by local depletion simultaneously with the administration of wine — Of the third form, externally by iodine and blisters, internally by tonics and iodide of potassium 222 LECTURE XXXI. Treatment of Intestinal Secondary Affections — Two chief indications: (1) alle- viation of symptoms, (2) modification of typhous deposition — Poulticing — Local depletion in early stage — Analogy in variolous eruption — Danger of alterative or purgative treatment at the outset of Continued Fever — Necessity for caution — Constipation — Diurrhmn — Poultices, demulcents, sedative astringents, injec- tions of flax-seed tea — Tympany — Turpentine injection — Diet in diarrhoea — Perforative peritonitis — Opium our sheet-anchor — Danger of the antiphlogistic method — Dr. Murchison on the treatment of this accident — Bran poultices and warm fomentations — Hemorrhage from the intestine iu fever — Not to be inter- fered with unless continued and excessive — Treatment by astringents, opium — Illustrative case .......... . 227 XVI CONTENTS. LECTURE XXXII. PAGE Treatment of the Nervous Secondary Symptoms of Fever — Headache — Cold lotions, warm fomentations, moderate leeching, shaving the head, cold affusion, ice — Delirium — Treatment depends on (1) period of case, (2) presence of hyper- emia of the brain, or otherwise — Ice, leeches, shaving the head, cold affusion in active delirium — Nourishment and wine in passive or anaemic delirium — Sleeplessness — Moderate leeching, cold affusion, ice — Turpentine in constipa- tion and tympany — Catheterism in distended bladder — Sedatives — Opium, tartar emetic and opium, hyoscyamus, bromide of potassium, chloral, wine — Convulsions — Most formidable in fever — Uremic, due to (1) retention of urine : catheterism ; (2) suppression of urine : dry cupping and poulticing over kidueys, diluents, diuretics, aperient enemata, promotion of action of the skin . . 237 LECTURE XXXIII. Phlegmasia Alba Dolens — The swelling is not always painful, or white in appear- ance — Symmetry of the affected limb not lost — Professor Trousseau's views as to the etiology of the affection — Phlegmasia (1) of puerperal women, (2) in scrofulous and (3) cancerous cachexise — Pulmonary embolism caused by phleg- masia — Case of phlegmasia after typhus fever — Treatment of the affection — General Conclusion 245 Appendix B 253 INDEX 257 LECTURES ON FEVER. PART I. ESSENTIAL FEYER AND ITS SECONDARY AFFECTIONS. LECTURE I. Introductory — Injurious influence on the student and practitioner of having studied surgical cases exclusively— Influence of timidity from want of intimacy with bed- side treatment of fever — Erroneous views in relation to the frequency of inflamma- tory disease — Inflammation not the primary cause of many local though acute affections — Errors of Broussais — Abuse of the antiphlogistic treatment. Several of the hospitals io Dublin, considered as schools for clinical study, have the advantage of being essentially medico-chi- rurgical hospitals — that is to say, that in them the student, in con- nection with his surgical pursuits, may see and study most forms of the so-called medical diseases, which include not only the acute and chronic local diseases, but the various forms of essential affections, including continued fevers. I am anxious to draw the attention of the surgical student to the all-important subject of fever; for when we consider the enormous extent to which this fell disease, or group of diseases, prevails over the world, and also that it is in itself a special study, we cannot help believing that the student who has not dealt with fever, no matter how ably he may have been educated in surgery and in the history of visceral diseases, has but half learned his business. The importance of a practical knowledge of fever, as distinguished from that obtained from books or lectures, is not yet sufficiently impressed on the surgical student. If such a one possesses a reflect- ing mind, he will have abundant and bitter causes of regret at having neglected his hospital opportunities, whereby alone he can obtain that intimacy with the subject which will be his guide and safeguard in after-life. It is in the fever-wards alone that he can learn the price- less lesson that there is a large class of diseases, whose nature and property it is to get well of themselves, which require little or no 1 2 LECTURES ON FEVER. medication or daily interference. This lesson is not to be learned from purely surgical studies, one effect of which leads in medicine to the nimia diligentia, so common a fault in practice, so clear a sign that the medical mind has not been formed. He will see that what the patient requires is in many cases only time, and to be kept from sinking by proper support. He will come to learn how this great fact of the spontaneous cessation of disease bears on all therapeutical research in fever by showing him that he is not to confound the post hoc with the propter hoc. He will learn that there are few questions more difficult of determination than the effect of any special remedy, or even general mode of treatment in diseases which are under the law of periodicity; and thus he will be taught caution in drawing conclusions as to his own practice, while he will be charitable in re- flecting upon that of others. Take for example the case of rheumatic fevers. How long have physicians been seeking for a specific treat- ment? Venesection, blistering, mercury, opium, bark, alkalies, acids, have all had their advocates, whose statements are supported by genuine cases, and yet the question remains unsolved; would not the disease have subsided of itself as well, and as quickly, as under any specific treatment? And in case of recovery, may not this even have occurred notwithstanding the treatment ? I heard with great pleasure the report by my distinguished friend Dr. Sibson, read at the meeting of the British Association at New- castle-upon-Tyne, in which a long series of cases of rheumatic fever was detailed as having been successfully treated without any medicine beyond small doses of peppermint water — given, I presume, to satisfy the minds of the patients that something was being done for them beyond keeping them warm in bed till the disease subsided. It is not to be understood that Dr. Sibson does not recognize the frequency of local inflammation in rheumatic fever, and the necessity of meeting it in many cases. But his researches are directed to show the comparative uselessness of a specific treatment. I well remember the time when surgeons, who had been otherwise well educated, but had never in their student days seen or attended a case of typhus fever, objected to deal with such a case, and were of course, from apprehension of contagion, more or less ineffective when brought to perform any operation such as catheterism, and so on. All students who are looking to the public service, whether in the civil, military, or naval department, should be taught by those who assume their direction or instruction that they cannot tell when they may have to deal with fever even on a great scale, and that, as the principle of treatment of all fevers is the same, the study of the dis- GENERAL CONsI DERATIONS. 3 ense at home will fit them to meet the yellow fever, the bilious remittent, the camp fever, the plague of the Levant, and the cholera of India. 1 How few of our surgical students are aware of the fact shown by Sir Gilbert Blane that in the Peninsular War more men died of fever than from all other causes, including the sword. But, further, the student who confines himself to merely a surgical ward often enters on his profession unfitted by timidity to meet his foe. I have known several instances where surgeons in civil practice, though willing to do their duty, were always nervous on entering a fever ward. I do not say that such men were cowards in the ordinary sense of the word, or that the feeling of danger would make them shrink from discharging their duty; but there is a condition which may be described as physical fear, distinct from moral fear ; a condi- tion of susceptibility to contagion, which is doubtless lessened by intimacy with disease. I know of a gentleman who was called to inspect the body of the first victim of cholera in the earliest and great epidemic of 1832. The case occurred some miles from Dublin. During his return he had many of the symptoms which threaten an attack of cholera. He had the abdominal pains, the feeling of immi- nent death — "the cold meditation of death" of the old authors — cramps, and other symptoms. For two days these recurred. The epidemic shortly afterwards burst out with violence in the city, when, feeling that if this condition persisted he would be unable to do his duty, he entered a crowded temporary cholera hospital, where he remained for thirty-six hours in close attendance on the sick. During the first eighteen hours seven patients died, it may be said, in his arms. I need not say that all the yielding of the system he had shown rapidly disappeared. I know of another case, where a gentleman, now an eminent member of the profession, was cured of repeated attacks of cholerine by undertaking the office of house surgeon to a large cholera hospital, where, under the direction of the late Dr. Mackintosh, he had to conduct the treatment by venous injection in many cases. To mention a third instance, the case of Mr. West and his party is quoted by my father, Dr. Whitley Stokes, in his pamphlet on Contagion. 2 During the expedition to Egypt under Sir Ralph Abercrombie Mr. West was ordered to take charge of a pest hospital at Rosetta in the beginning of May, 1801. In this house he was shut up for four months. His staff consisted of an assistant surgeon, an Italian ; an English soldier; and of Arab servants. " No one of the party took 1 See Swan's Edition of Sydenham, page 75. - Observations on Contagion, 2d edit., Dnbliii. 1818. 4 LECTURES ON FEVER. the disease, although Mr. West operated and dressed the buboes himself, and treated sores from anthraces so extensive that half a pound of flesh sometimes came off by sloughing; and although the servants washed the sheets, bedding, and bandages, rubbed the patients with mercurial ointment extensively, supported the faint, tied the delirious, and buried the dead. In short, they were exposed as fully as possible to contagion. At this time the plague was so severe at a village twenty-five miles from Eosetta that one-fourth part of a popu- lation of 400 died within a month. I have said that none of the party took the disease. Great attention was paid to cleanliness, and the house was a roomy building, situated on an elevated bank over the Nile and exposed to the northwest sea breeze. On this singular result Dr. Stokes remarks, "Mr. West's deep in- terest in the discharge of his duty and in the improvement of his profession must have contributed to turn his mind from the selfish melancholy contemplation of his personal risk, a risk which one of our best officers fairly compared to that of a hundred battles. Such has been the triumph of good sense, temperance, firmness, and in- dustry ; and Mr. West has earned a civic crown which some men will venture to compare with the laurels of the greatest conquerors." The surgical student who has not studied fever in the living sub- ject, and himself felt the responsibility of its management, is in this position : the doctrine of the universality — or of the extraordinary frequency, whichever you will — of inflammation has been impressed on his mind in every possible way, for the ordinary practice at the commencement of a course of surgery used to be to occupy the student for many weeks with the history of inflammation. Inflammation is thus placed in the foremost rank. It is the great thing to which his earliest attention is directed, and naturally it appears to him to be the key to all medical and surgical knowledge. It is still more impressed upon him by the kind of experience he gets during a considerable part of his studies. That experience is obtained in a surgical ward, and it is hence very natural that he should have exaggerated notions of the importance and frequency of one morbid process. Too often at the end of his course he finds that he has been taught only inflam- mation, he has seen little else than inflammation, and he believes in little else than inflammation. A great many students are educated in this way, and they go forth to the world ignorant of two facts in practical medicine and surgery, the importance of which cannot be overrated. The first is the existence of an enormous number of acute and dangerous diseases which are not inflammatory — of diseases, as I said before, which are acute, which are dangerous, and still further, GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS. 5 which are febrile. The idea has never been impressed on their minds that there may be a local, acute, febrile, and most dangerous disease which is not only, to use the words of a recent author, not inflamma- tion, but something the very opposite of inflammation. When we consider that it is in the various forms of fever that these conditions are met with, and when we recollect the extent to which fever pre- vails over the world, we are justified in declaring that when we compare diseases in which inflammation is the primary condition with those in which it is not, the former fall immeasurably short of the latter in number and importance. The other great fact is that the student has not learned the error of exclusive antiphlogistic treatment in the management of ordinary primary inflammation. From not having had to deal with local dis- eases, which require not the lancet, not starvation, but rather tonics and wine, he has never become accustomed to, or familiar with, the latter remedies. He is timid in the use of these measures, and even in the ordinary primary diseases he follows too long the common rule of antiphlogistic treatment instead of changing in time to one of a tonic and stimulating nature. The erroneous application of the anti- phlogistic method arose subsequent to a change of doctrine from humoralism to solidism. In order to get a clearer notion of this matter, let us go a little back. Before pathological anatomy became a science it was held that a large number of diseases depended on the alterations of the fluids. But when anatomy was directed to the investigation of dis- ease medical opinion underwent a change, and solidism succeeded to humoralism. Disease was then an alteration of the solids, the living tissues of the body. Now, I wish to impress upon you that solidism, as was then understood, soon came to mean more than its original name would imply; and solidism plus the doctrine. of inflammation became the ruling dogma of the day. For the same mode of investigation, which established the frequency and variety of alterations of the solids, showed that in many cases there was a common character recognized as the result of inflamma- tion. This paved the way for the introduction of the so-called physiological doctrine, which referred all diseases to alterations of vitality in the solids — not generally as affecting the whole system, but local — not differing from one another by any special characters, but in degree only. A disease was, then, either a plus or a minus vitality in the affected organ, and its symptoms were explained by the sympathies of that organ. But as so many diseases were attended with vascularity, deposition, and increased sensibility, it was inferred 6 LECTURES ON FEVER. that most local affections, and the more important diseases, were ex- amples of augmented vitality in the part, producing not only the local symptoms but those also which arose from the sympathetic irritation. This doctrine spread rapidly, and there were many rea- sons why it should do so. Tt was specious, simple, and had for its founder a man of extraordinary energy and eloquence. In this world any doctrine which is novel and has an energetic and eloquent apostle will not want for converts, and Broussais was a man of great talent, experience, and practical knowledge. He was, however, deficient in reasoning power, and, in my opinion, an imperfect pathological anato- mist. The doctrine became popular on the Continent from the facility which it promised in the treatment of disease, for as the great majority of diseases was symptomatic of the plus vitality of some organ, we had only to discover the part in which this excess of life was seated, and to modify it, of course, by antiphlogistic treatment. When the investigations of Broussais and his followers were di- rected to the Examination of fever cases, it was found, on the Continent more especially, that local disease frequently existed in the gastro- intestinal tube. At once, then, the doctrine followed, that fever formed no exception to the rule — that it was symptomatic of a plus vitality of the gastro-intestinal tube; and we were led to believe that fever could be at once cured by leeching, by starvation, by poultices to the bell v, and by such means. It is curious that there are some circumstances connected with fever which greatly tended to prop up this doctrine. We shall see by-and- by, that an essential condition of fever is periodicity ; that it is a disease which has a tendency to spontaneous termination at a given time. It is like a paroxysm of ague, only prolonged as it were. This will give the best idea of fever. This mysterious law of periodicity implies that the system has the power of curing itself — that is to say, that the diseased action will spontaneously subside either suddenly or gradually. Now, it is found that there are a variety of circumstances which interfere with the operation of this extraordinary law of spon- taneous cure. One of these is the existence of a local irritation in anv part of the system. We see this remarkably exemplified in cases of ague. We shall very often find that in cases of intermitting fever the treatment by bark will not succeed; and when we come to inquire the cause of this, we find that there is some local inflammation present. If we can remove that local inflammation, then the treatment by bark succeeds. Broussais appealed strongly to the following fact: that in cases of fever, after free depletion of the abdomen, the patients speedily re- GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS. 7 covered. So they did : but the nature of the fact was misinterpreted. Those patients had a local secondary disease in the intestine, which interfered with, or prevented, the operation of the law of periodicity. When that local disease was modified or removed, the law of perio- dicity came again into action, and the patient recovered.. The fever did not subside because it was symptomatic of a disease of the intes- tine; but it subsided because, the disease of the intestine being re- moved or modified, it was reduced to its normal state, as it were to its state of simplicity, and then the law of periodicity was enabled to act. The doctrine of the purely symptomatic nature of fever was re- ceived extensively on the Continent, in America, and in England and Ireland, but not so extensively in the schools of the two latter coun- tries. There was a much greater reluctance to the reception of the physiological doctrine in this country and in England than on the Continent, or in America, and this is highly creditable to the British and Irish medical mind. Many reasons might be adduced to explain why this was so, but we shall not enter at length. into them. I may, however, observe that English medicine had. received a great degree of excellence from the writings of the old masters in England — from the writings of Sydenham, Haygarth, Fothergill, and other men of that order. These great medical observers had, unknowingly, taught the true medical philosophy. They had taught a rational eclecticism, and hence they implanted in the minds of the British medical inves- tigators great reserve and extreme caution in the reception of new doctrines. Still, however, upon the younger members of the profession the doctrine had a wonderful influence. A large number of the junior members of the medical and surgical profession in this country, during the last quarter of a century, or perhaps the last half century, were strongly imbued with this doctrine, and went forth to practise over the world, influenced by the theory of inflammation being the sole cause of diseases, and believing that the whole practice of medicine was reduced to the removal of local inflammation. Another cause, however, I cannot help noticing here. About this time, owing to the unhappy and calamitous division of the profession into medicine and surgery, arose those corporate distinctions that have done so much to retard the progress of science in these countries; exclusive schools of surgery sprang up, and consequently, as I ob- served at the commencement, a large and increasing number of young men were educated without having ever seen a case of fever. They were educated in surgery ; they were educated in a surgical ward, and were sent forth naturally advocates of inflammation, because they had 8 LECTURES ON FEVER. seen nothing else ; and thus, ill prepared, they went forth to combat fever — that disease which numbers more victims than any other — over the wide dominions of the British crown, in America, in the West Indies, in Asia, in Africa. These men in hundreds— I may say thousands — went out ignorant of the fearful enemy they had to encounter, and trusting in the teachings which compared the ordinary phenomena of ophthalmia, or those of the healing of an incised wound, or those of the cicatrization of an ulcer, with the symptoms of that terrible group of diseases which embraces the plague, the yellow fever, the bilious remittent, the malignant ague, and the typhus fever. There is nothing more difficult, gentlemen, than for a man who has been educated in a particular doctrine to free himself from it, even though he has found it to be wrong. There is something in a human mind which renders the reception of a doctrine, if it be a bad one, a most dangerous circumstance. It is like the imbibition of a particular poison or miasma. We find that some men who have been once exposed to the miasmata which induce intermitting fever will, for nearly the whole course of their lives, be incapable of getting rid of that influence which has been once received. And thus it is not only with physical but with moral or intellectual impressions. I have said that it is difficult to unlearn. This fastening of false doctrine in the mind is one cause ; but there are other causes too. The indolence of many men prevents them taking the trouble to unlearn. The pride of many men has the same effect; and, above all things, there is this, that a very large number of students, not only of surgery, but of medicine, although they were taught the technicali- ties of the profession — the alphabet of their profession, as it were — were not taught what is infinitely more important, namely, how to teach themselves. Now, this ought to be the grand object of every teacher of medicine, and, indeed, of any science of observation. I believe that no man can be fully and entirely taught anything. He must teach himself. And what the teacher has to do, and what I have ever set before myself as my highest duty, is to endeavour to teach you how to teach yourselves. We can easily anticipate what the result of all this must have been ; and I believe I am not saying too much when I declare that a large proportion of the fearful mortality to which our gallant army has been subjected in the colonial service has been owing to the circumstances to which I now draw your attention — the fact of the medical officers going out with erroneous doctrine fastened in their minds. This name of inflammation is an unfortunate one, and it is to be regretted that it was given to the process in question. It gives the GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS. 9 idea of a fire which must be quenched by its opposite, water; of a heat which must be quenched by its opposite, cold ; of vascularity — ful- ness of the bloodvessels — which must be met by measures which will empty those vessels. It gives the idea of a fever, an excitement which is only to be met by abstinence, by starvation, or, as the French term it, dilte absolue, which means no diet at all. The fact is, gentlemen, that the formula of contraria contrariis has as little title to respect in legitimate medicine as that of similia similibus in quackery. Both are false ; and I really believe that any exclusive application of either for- mula is both ignorant and mischievous in the highest degree. The next great error was, that although the surgical student had plenty of opportunities of seeing symptomatic fever, he had no oppor- tunity of seeing the essential fever, and he naturally confounded the two together. And hence, in this country and abroad, for many years the abuse of the antiphlogistic treatment was carried to an extent which it is frightful to contemplate. Conditions of the system which required wine, bark, stimulants, careful nutrition, were met by the lancet, by leeches, and by starvation. I remember when I was a student of the old Meath Hospital, there was hardly a morning that some twenty or thirty sufferers from acute local disease were not phlebotomized. The floor was running with blood ; it was dangerous to cross the prescrib- ing hall for fear of slipping; and these scenes continued to be wit- nessed for many years. The cerebral symptoms of typhus fever were met by opening the temporal artery, or by a large application of leeches to the head ; and it sometimes happened that the patient died while the leeches were upon his temple — died surely, and almost suddenly. An eminent apothecary in this city assured me that when he was serving his apprenticeship there was hardly a week that he was not summoned to take off a large number of leeches from the dead body. I mention these circumstances to show to what extent, even in our own country, the abuse of this doctrine had been carried. It is not so now. Those who have been in the habit of attending fever hospitals in this country will bear me out when I say that the lancet is an instrument now very seldom indeed employed in our wards. But while all this is true, it must be understood that I am far from going the length of some modern physicians in their wholesale condemnation of the antiphlo- gistic treatment in various forms in the management even of essential fever. To this subject I purpose to return in my next lecture. 10 LECTURES ON FEVER. LECTURE II. Change of Practice as regards the treatment of fever — Change of type in disease from sthenic to asthenic — Views of Alison — Sir Robert Christison — The author's views — Evidence (1) from symptoms, (2) from appearances of blood drawn by venesec- tion, (3) from pathological appearances of internal viscera, and of serous mem- branes. (4) from isolated sthenic leases, and (5) from influence of treatment — Signs of a return to sthenic forms of disease — Vital character of disease. Based on the doctrine that local inflammation or irritation was the exciting cause of febrile disease, we observe the wide-spread adoption of an antiphlogistic treatment in fever. The doctrine of essentiality of disease was ridiculed. Venesection in fever was common, and its traditional employment was supported by modern theory; the use of wine and other stimulants was forbidden, and many a life was sacri- ficed to this unphilosophical method of looking at disease. But for nearly half a century we observe a change in practice in the opposite direction. General blood-letting is rarely practised; local bleeding in a very modified way ; while stimulants have been, by one school, clearly employed in an unjustifiable manner. So complete was the change in practice, that venesection, from being a routine treatment, the performance of which was entrusted to junior students, became the rarest of surgical operations. Within the last twenty years I have known several surgeons who had never performed or even witnessed the operation. I remember having to instruct a hospital surgeon of remarkable ability in the operation. For a period of nearly twenty years the use of the lancet was unknown in our wards, and in latter times, when venesection was occasionally prac- tised here, it was instructive as well as amusing to see how the class crowded round to witness for the first time a proceeding so unusual. We can hardly conceive a revolution in practice more complete. In place of the loss of blood we have the exhibition of stimulants. In place of a system of almost starvation we have the careful use of nutriment. This change in practice, depending on change in the vital character of disease, was followed by the charge against many of our predecessors and teachers that they were mistaken practitioners, ignorant of true pathology, and little better than blind followers of traditional error. Not only have their powers of observation been questioned, but even GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS. 11 their morality and honour have been assailed ; and it has been suggested that the whole doctrine of change of type in disease was an invention to cloak former errors. It is interesting to note that this is not the first time that charges of a similar kind have been brought against the profession. Thus Broussais arraigned the existing and former practitioners for not treat- ing fevers and acute diseases by local bleeding and starvation. Can there be stronger evidence than this that our modern practice is not a novelty ? All his predecessors were in error; because they practised as we do now. I say that this charge was remakable, inasmuch as the author's views largely influenced European practice for many years. But the thinking man finds it hard to believe that the fathers of British medicine were always in error, or that they were bad observers and mistaken practitioners. They, indeed, have rested from their labours, but their works remain ; and he who reads the writings of Sydenham, of Haygarth and of Fothergill, of Heberden and Fordyce, of Gregory, Cullen, Alison, Cheyne, or Graves, must have a very inapprehensive mind, if he fail to discover that there were giants in those days, and that the advocacy of such ideas only indicates a state of mind not consonant with the modesty of science. The declaration that it has been or can be proved by a more advanced pathology that bleeding never was the proper remedy for fevers and inflammations has as yet no scientific ground. It is not yet given to us, notwithstanding all our advance in normal and in morbid anatomy, in the physiology of health or of disease, to be able to say, from the most minute examination of the dead organ or structure, what were all the conditions which attended it during life, under the influence of disease; what were its local vital phenomena; what was the accompanying constitutional state, whether sthenic or asthenic. But, let us ask, which is the more probable of these two supposi- tions? First, that our predecessors were bad observers, incapable of divining the truth, and blind adopters of an antiquated and mis- chievous method — or, secondly, that the type of disease has changed, and that almost in our own time. It fortunately happens that we can examine a living witness of great authority in this matter, and can refer to the works of two more who have left us their written testimony. Sir Kobert Christison is still among us, in health and intellectual vigour — long may he be so — Dr. Alison and Dr. Graves have been but lately removed. Now, all these testify that the character of disease has changed from a sthenic to an asthenic type ; that is to say, from a condition in which inflammatory action was the prominent feature to another where that 12 LECTURES ON FEVER. state was absent, or, if present, only ephemeral — a condition observ- able in essential and local diseases, in which the antiphlogistic treat- ment agreed well, and was productive of great relief, to one in which a tonic, stimulant, and supporting regime was found the best method of guiding the system to a happy termination of the disease. It is very important to note that these views were not formed from any historical study of the recorded labours of others, but come before us as the actual observations of the great men whose names I have stated. They tell us that which they know — that which they them- selves have seen. If we refuse this collective though separate and independent evidence— if we hold, with Professor Bennett and with Dr. Markham, that the doctrine of change of type is untenable — we must believe one of two things : either that these distinguished men were deceived or were themselves deceivers. From this alternative there is no escape. Let us hear Dr. Alison: " 'When we reflect on these facts, we can- not think it unlikely that the result of the inquiry which I have stated as so important may be to show either that all causes capable of excit- ing diseased action in the animal economy, or, more probably, that the liability to diseased actions in the different departments of the animal economy itself, are subject to variations, which are made known to us only by the variation of such phenomena themselves; occurring merely in the natural course of time — an element affecting all vital phenomena quite differently from its agency on inanimate nature; and the effects of which, on living beings, we must take as ultimate facts, to be carefully observed, arranged, and classified, but which we are not to expect to be resolved into any others, which the study of this department of the works of Providence presents." When I read these words of Alison, the best man I ever knew, it is with a feeling of wonder how it has happened that men should forget what reverence is due to his memory, whether we look on him personally as a man of science and a teacher; or at his life as an exemplar of that of a soldier of Christ. Sir Robert Christison 1 shows that the change of treatment in acute diseases is to be considered with reference to fever as well as to local affections. He bears witness that the abandonment of bleeding in idiopathic fevers preceded by a good many years its abandonment in acute inflammation ; and that this change in practice took place gradu- ally in all acute inflammations, not alone in pneumonia, because of the improved diagnosis of the disease, but in all others, in many of which 1 Memoir on the Changes which have taken place in the Constitution of Fevers and Acute Inflammation in Edinburgh during the last Forty-six Years. 1856. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS. 13 no sensible progress in diagnosis had been made. Looking at the fever epidemics of Edinburgh from the beginning of the present cen- tury, he shows conclusively that in 1817-20, and in 1826-29, their characters were those of Cullen's synocha and synochus — inflamma- tory, relapsing, critical. Speaking of the epidemics of 1817-20, he dwells on the hard, in- compressible pulse, the ardent heat of the skin, the florid hue of the venous blood and the impetus with which it escaped almost per saltum from the vein, the vivid glow of the surface, and the distracting pain and pulsation of the heart and chest. Similar phenomena occurred in the epidemic of 1826-29, and in both bleeding was largely practised with the happiest effects; so that in the former epidemic the mortality, which was at first one in twenty- two, fell to one in thirty — a result which disposes of the charge of malpraxis against the profession. But in 1834 Sir Eobert found that probably for two years pre- viously a change had been going on ; synocha had disappeared ; synochus had lost the vehement reaction of its early stages; typical typhus was much more common ; and what did not come up to Cullen's mark of fully formed typhus was what physicians would now commonly call mild typhus, with more of introductory reaction than we observe at present, but with less than in the two epidemics of 1817-20 and 1826-29. "In epidemic fevers," says this distinguished physician, "a change may take place in the constitutional part of the fever; and this change has been exemplified in Edinburgh during the last forty years, by a transition from the sthenic or phlogistic character in the first twelve years to the asthenic or adynamic character in the twelve years which have just elapsed." And he adds these most remarkable words : — " If this change be admitted to have been proved, there is an end to all difficulty in accounting for the abandonment of blood-letting in the treatment of our fevers. In point of fact, I am able to state very positively that the abandonment of bleeding in fever was suggested by the observation of a change in the constitution of fever, and in the effects of the remedy on it, and not by any other circumstance, whether extraneous or intrinsic. It is impossible to ascribe such change of practice, as Dr. Bennett has done in the instance of pneu- monia, to an improved knowledge of disease. We have improved our knowledge of fever so far as to have been for some time well acquainted with the form of enteric typhus (dothinenteritis), which was unknown, or not recognized, at the commencement of our epi- 14 LECTURES ON FKVER. demies. Bat this is a rare form of fever in Edinburgh, scarcely belonging to its epidemics at all. And as to our only undoubted epidemic fevers, typhus and synocha with their intermediates, we cannot be truthfully said to be the better acquainted with them in 1857 than we were in 1830. "I have given, I hope, a sounder explanation, less flattering per- haps to the rising generation of physicians, but surely more honour- able to physic itself, more creditable to medical observation and experience, more consonant with the advanced state of medical philosophy. My own convictions on the subject are so strong that I regard nothing as more likely than that in the course of time some now present will see the day when a reflux in the constitution of fever will present it again in its sthenic dress, and again make the lancet its remedy. And in that event it is not impossible that, while we are now charged with giving up blood-letting, because it was dis- covered to have never been the proper method of cure, we shall hereafter be assailed by some new enthusiast in blood-letting, who, in imitation of Dr. Welsh, and regardless of the fate of his doctrines, will accuse us, with equal justice, of having our late fevers asthenic and typhous by blindly withholding their fittest remedy." Since the delivery of my address on " Change of Type in Disease" before the British Medical Association at Leamington, in the year 1865, I have received numerous letters on the subject from many leading physicians in England and Ireland. The testimony of these gentlemen has been of the strongest character in favour of the occur- rence of an asthenic type of local inflammatory disease within the last forty years. That the type of both local and essential disease varies within certain limits of time we must believe. That a more asthenic form of disease has for nearly half a century prevailed in these countries is, I hold, an incontrovertible truth, and a time may come when those whose experience is of a later date will speak of the practice of their predecessors with greater modesty and more reverence. T may now add the results of my own experience in this matter. I remember the period when the change of type took place in Ire- land, and am under the impression that it was observed earlier in this country than in Scotland, or at least in England. The great epidemic of fever in 1827 was a remarkable one from its compound nature, and seemed to be made up of synocha, synochus, and enteric typhus. But nothing was more remarkable than the vehemence of the inflam- matory reaction in many cases; and it is a curious fact that this was sometimes seen at its highest pitch in the relapses, when it was often GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS. 15 t far more violent and dangerous than in the first attack. Local bleed- ing was largely employed. In many cases venesection or arteriotomy had excellent results; so that, although there were abundance of cases with prostration, and others marked by the typhoid condition, the old sthenic character had not disappeared. The amount of wine used at that time in hospitals was quite insignificant as compared with its consumption in more recent times. Between 1822 and 1828 the sthenic character of essential and local disease existed, and the lancet was freely used — often, as I believe and have elsewhere stated, with too great freedom. But I well remember observing the frequent occurrence of the phenomena mentioned by Sir Robert Christison — the vehement action of the heart, the incom- pressibility of the pulse, the vivid redness of the venous blood, and the force with which it spouted, almost per sallum, from the orifice in the vein. I have myself taken as much as sixty ounces in a case of active cerebral congestion, with hemiplegia, before any impression was made on the arterial excitement; in this case complete success followed. In rheumatic fever, too, we found the use of the lancet in the early stage of the disease to be productive of great relief. Vene- section was seldom employed more than once, but its effect was to shorten the duration of the disease, to lower the fever, to lessen the liability to the so-called metastases, and to render the whole case much more amenable to treatment. But I have not bled in rheumatic fever for the last thirty years, for the whole character of the disease has changed. We have not had for many years the bounding pulse, the exaggerated heat and sweating, or the same liability to acute inflammations of the internal parts. The action of the heart is often feeble, and the tonic and supporting plan seems called for from an early period. Another point worthy of remark is, that cardiac and aortic murmurs of the anasmic kind have for many years been much more frequently observed, both during the attack and in the convalescence, and these demand the use of iron for their removal. In judging of this question the evidence of those who have been intimate with acute diseases in this country during the period of 1820 to 1830 or 1835 must be attended to on this point. As already stated, I have received a vast number of communications from experienced and practical men, who had no theory to support, all telling the same tale, all testifying to the fact that a change in the vital character of acute disease was observed. This was particularly seen in rheumatic fever, which gradually lost its quality of high reaction, as shown by the great heat of the skin, the bounding and resisting pulse, the vigour 16 LECTURES ON FEVER,, of the heart's action ; the frequency and severity of metastasis, not only as regards external but internal structures whose functions were violently disturbed. Cases, too, of visceral inflammation, independent of rheumatic complication, and marked by high reaction, pain, and great functional disturbance, were common. This was well seen in the cases of pleuropneumonia, in pericarditis, and in peritonitis, in all of which violence of symptoms, high reaction, and great pain and rapidity of morbid processes were the rule. Now, since the asthenic character of acute disease has set in, all this has changed. The violent acute and commonly suppurative pneumonia is rarely met with. We frequently meet cases of pericarditis in which, but for the physical signs, the disease could not be recognized, or its being overlooked would be excusable — you have seen many cases with little or no oppressive distress or throbing of the heart. And as to acute peri- tonitis, formerly so well known, there has rarely been seen in any of our wards a case of it that did not result from the perforation of the intestine in enteric fevers. It is needless to add examples; let us rather turn to another kind of evidence. Hitherto the change of type has been recognized and determined less by anatomical observation than by the observation of symptoms, and still more by the application of therapeutical tests. Kemedial measures of a certain kind were found to fail and to be hurtful, where they were formerly safe and successful ; and, conversely, the use of a supporting system of tonics, and the free employment of stimulants, were found necessary and safe where formerly they did mischief. That morbid anatomy adds its testimony to the truth of the doc- trine of the change of type in disease will, I believe, appear from considerations based on observed facts. Thus, after or about the time when an asthenic tendency was first noticed in Ireland, a change was detected in the condition of the blood drawn by venesection. The buffed and cupped character became very rare, and I well remember expressing my surprise at the absence of the fibrinous coat in cases in which we had fully expected its presence. In place of the small, dense, almost spherical crassamentum, we had a soft clot, with little if any separation of serum ; while, instead of the buffy coat with inverted edges, we had a thin sizy pellicle. This circumstance was one of those which led us to be more aud more cautious in the use of the lancet. Again, the specimens of acute disease have had for many years a character very different from that commonly met with in Dublin between 1820 and 1830. As a general rule, these specimens all GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS. 17 showed appearances indicative of a less degree of pathological energy. In pneumonia, for example, the redness, firmness, compactness, and defined boundary of the solidified lung was seldom seen ; and that state of dryness and vivid scarlet injection, to which I ventured to give the name of the first stage of pneumonia, became very rare. In place of these sthenic characters, we have had a condition more approaching to splenization — the affected parts purple, not bright red; friable, not firm ; moist, not dry ; and the whole looking more like the result of diffuse than of energetic and concentrated inflammation. Let us now turn to the serous membranes, and the same story is repeated. The high arterial injection, the dryness of the surface, the free production, close adhesion, and firm structure of the false mem- branes in acute affections of the arachnoid, pericardium, pleura, and peritoneum, which had been so familiar, ceased in a great measure to make their appearance. The exudations began to assume a more or less hemorrhagic phase, serous or sero-fibrinous effusions tinged with colouring matter replacing the old results of sthenic inflammations. The effused lymph lay like a pasty covering, rather than a close and firm investment as before; it was thin, ill-defined, and transparent in varying degree. All this tallied exactly with the change in the vital character of the disease. It has happened to me — and I mention this in evidence that we were not mistaken with reference to cases of the sthenic character — that a few instances of disease in its old phase of high inflammatory reaction have appeared in isolated examples and at irregular intervals of time, so that we at once recognized their nature, and employed with success the old treatment in all its vigour— employed the lancet, though for many years it had been laid aside. This is important as showing that there are influences, their nature as yet unknown, which affect the vital character of local disease in an inconstant manner. During the last few years we have not been without signs of a return to the old sthenic forms of disease. Even fifteen years ago a typical case of the old form of acute pleuropneumonia occurred in this city in the practice of the late Dr. Oroker. The symptoms were those of the highest inflammatory reaction, attended by violent excite- ment of the heart. There was great pain and dyspnoea, a bounding pulse, a burning skin, and the rusty and tenacious sputa which for many years had not been seen in our hospital wards. This patient was treated by free venesection, copious leeching, and the exhibition of tartarated antimony; and though the lung had passed largely into consolidation, the patient made a complete and rapid recovery. Cases of a similar kind have reappeared in our wards during the last three 2 18 LECTURES ON FEVER. years, and the use of the lancet, which for a quarter of a century was unknown with us, has been on several occasions resumed, and in all such cases with the very best results. The relief has been always immediate, the resolution of the disease, as shown by physical exami- nation, generally rapid, and the convalescence, with one exception, most satisfactory. In three out of four cases the treatment consisted in one bleeding, which sometimes was followed by the application of six or eight leeches to the seat of pain. No further treatment beyond the use of the simplest palliatives was employed. Must we not, then, agree with Sir Kobert Christison that the disuse of venesection, so remarkable in these countries during a period of about forty years, is wrongly appealed to as evidence of our advance in the healing art? We are not to hold that the former practice of venesection was improper or unscientific; and while we admit that, under the influence of old custom and the anatomical theory of disease, blood-letting was abused in many cases, we must be careful not to drift into the opposite error of neglecting this remedy where it is called for, nor be guilty of the folly of holding that the physicians of the past two or three generations were bad observers and harmful practitioners. That they were men of truth is obvious to every one who understands disease, and who takes at its proper value the opinion of those who show such overweening confidence in the present so-called pathological medicine — so much based upon mere structural and chemical changes — and such neglect of some important medico-ethical considerations, as, for example, the modesty of science and the practice of a reve- rential spirit towards those whose works prove that they were great and truthful men. The change of type is to be seen in the character of the symptoms and, as I have endeavoured to show, in the condition of the patho- logical changes. But it is to be recognized chiefly by the therapeu- tical test, by the behaviour of disease, whether general or local, under treatment. It may be well to repeat that the change seems to date in the present century from about the time of the first invasion of cholera, and has continued more or less ever since. The change from sthenic to asthenic (so far as we at present know) is one more of the vital than of the structural or chemical characters of disease. The symptoms indicate, as it were, a lower tension of all the vital phenomena. The convalescence is less perfect and slower, as are also the physical signs of the resolution of local disease. The capability of bearing a reducing treatment is singularly diminished. Local lesions exhibit a greater latency. The nervous system shows GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS. 19 earlier signs of depression, while tonics or stimulants have been better borne. So far as medical experience goes, we are forced to admit that the foundation for the healing art must rest on another, if not a broader, basis than that of anatomical and of chemical changes in disease. There are differences — and for want of a better name we may call them vital — which more intimately relate to life and health than to the anatomical or chemical changes produced by disease; and these are to be reached by the study of the living phenomena of the body, and of the influence of agents upon them. In truth, the fruitless attempt to base medicine upon anatomical or even chemical changes should be a lesson to those who neglect the infinitely varied mutations of vital or of nervous action. The healing art, whether medicine or surgery, requires a wider field of study than is afforded by the dissecting-room or the laboratorj^. The anatomists, the histologists, and the chemists of some of the modern schools of medicine would derive a deep practical lesson from the words of Goethe, 1 who says, alluding to the insufficiency of mere anatomy to explain the mysteries of life — For he who seeks to learu, or gives Descriptions of, a thing that lives, Begins with " murdering, to dissect," The lifeless parts he may inspect — The limbs are there beneath his knife, And all — but that which gave them life ! Alas ! the spirit hath withdrawn — That which informed the mass is gone. They scrutinize it, when it ceases To be itself, and count its pieces, Finger and feel them, and call this Experiment — analysis. The study of normal anatomy being then fruitless in solving the problem of healthy life, it might be anticipated that researches as to morbid structure have thrown but a fitful and limited light on disease. In truth, the knowledge of Curative or of Preventive Medicine is not to be learned in the dissecting-room of a medical school, or in the dead-house of a hospital. Until this truth be acted on, many precious years of the best time of the student's life will be wasted. It has been attempted to base medicine on pathological anatomy, as if by its study we could solve the infinitely varied problems of disease and of thera- peutics. The explanation of even death through anatomical research 1 Faustus. Translated by John Anster, LL.D., of Trinity College, Dublin. 1835. P. 120. 20 LECTURES ON FEVER. is admissible only in exceptional cases. But it is of value — less as a key to the origin and cause of disease, than to diagnosis and the science or the many changes which attend morbid action. LECTURE III. Fever described, but not defined, as " a condition of existence without any known or necessary local anatomical change and subject to new laws, different from those of health" — Error committed by the school of Broussais — The " Law of Periodicity" — Danger to the fever patient due to the primary disease or to its secondary compli- cations — Secondary affections of continued fevers more inconstant than those of the exanthemata — Classification of diseases: (1) Diseases having an anatomical character ; (2) neuroses, having no known anatomical character; (3) fevers, subject to the law of periodicity, causing secondary affections, transmissible by contagion Fever is a condition more easily described than defined, and it is far easier to declare what it is not than what it actually is. During the continuance of a fever the system seems, as it were, to enter upon a new and special phase of existence. Most, if not all, functions are liable to be either interrupted or modified in a varying degree, and this possibty without the occurrence of any local anatomical change. We cannot say, I believe, what fever is in its essence, yet one thing appears certain — that it is not symptomatic of the organic changes which may be found combined with it, but is rather the generator and governor of those affections. It is, then, a condition without any known or necessary local anatomical change. It is true that in certain forms of fever there are secondary mani- festations of local disease. The pustulation of the skin in variola, the ulceration of the intestine in the so-called typhoid, and the bron- chial congestion in typhus, are examples of these conditions. But looking at fever in a wide sense, we may safely hold that these sec- ondary anatomical changes are inconstant in their amount, in their nature, and even in their seat; inconstant as to their time of appear- ance, their symptoms, their intensity, and their decadence, and utterly incompetent to explain the phenomena of the disease. The great fact remains, that in epidemics of fever cases arise in which, after the general symptoms have run their course, so as to present a perfect specimen of the general disease, we may dissect the brain, spinal marrow, nerves, the pulmonary and gastro intestinal mucous membrane, the liver, every organ you please, and find no anatomical change. I believe we may say that when the fatal diseases THE LAW OF PERIODICITY. 21 of the world are considered, the most destructive are those which have no recognized anatomical character. You may believe that when we speak of fever generally, secondary lesions are either wanting or are inconstant in their amount or in their nature. Upon their incom- petence to explain the matter I have already remarked. It will naturally be asked, If this be so, how did the French school commit the extraordinary error of declaring that a special anatomical change characterized every case of fever ? The reason is simply this : they committed two grave errors in medical philosophy: first, in confounding the effect with the cause; and secondly, in assuming the nature of a disease over the world from its observation in one locality. Had Broussais and his followers studied fever in Ireland, Scotland, or England ; had they gone abroad and examined it in the East or West Indies, or on the coast of Africa, we should have heard little of the doctrine that fever was not essential, but only symptomatic of this or that local inflammation. Observation has long shown that fever is a state of existence under a law of periodicity, and this is more or less true as to the general affection and as to its local results, though this law is more often manifest in the case of the former than in that of the latter. In the disease, I believe under any of its forms, two sources of danger affect the patient. One of these is death from simple depression of all the vital powers; for the poison of fever, like that of the rattle-snake, has a directly depressing influence on the system. Another source of danger is the production of secondary diseases. A general notion of this will be best obtained by considering an ordinary case of small- pox. The patient is taken ill ; he has shivering, fever, pain, vomiting, and so on ; and then we observe vesicles on the surface, these vesicles filling with pus, afterwards drying, and then disappearing. No man will say that the fever was symptomatic of the eruption. It is exactly the reverse ; the eruption was the result of the fever. So it is in fever ; the local disease is the product of the general. There is, however, this difference between what we term continued fever, typhus, or typhoid, and the exanthemata, that while in the latter the local affection is almost always accompanied by certain characters, it is not so with respect to the secondary diseases of the fevers specified. However, between the exanthemata and typhus fever there is this point of resemblance, that the secondary affections are utterly incompetent to explain the general phenomena of the disease, while in typhus, and, I believe, in typhoid, they are doubly inconstant in their seat, their nature, and their amount — and this is true even in cases occurring during the same epidemic. But they are of very great importance. 22 LECTURES OX FEVER. It may be asked, Are they inflammations? I believe they are not inflammations, or, if they be such, they have a specific character. Certainly in their first stages they are not inflammatory ; but in many instances, after they have existed in their non-inflammatory state, there comes on a reactive irritation, so that we may then have a mixed condition of essential and symptomatic fever. In my opinion this is the history of the ulcerations of the intestine so common in typhoid fever, for in the beginning — as in variola — we often find tumefaction and infiltration without increased vascularity. It has been proved that in many cases the morbid process goes no further, and we have retrocession of the infiltration, as we see retrocession in the eruption of smallpox. It may be laid down that while the great majority of separate diseases catalogued in books have an anatomical character, fever is wanting in this particular with regard to the practice of medicine. We may, then, divide diseases into three great classes. In the first class we have diseases which have an anatomical cha- racter — diseases to which we can give an anatomical expression. I need not occupy your time in giving examples of this class. In the next place, we have a most important class of diseases which, in the present state of our knowledge, cannot be connected with any recognized anatomical character, and yet they are not fevers. I allude to the neuroses, or, as they are commonly termed, nervous affections; of these mania, epilepsy, lock-jaw, hydrophobia, hysteria, chorea, con- vulsions, are familiar instances. Here we have some most remarkable affections, which have not any known anatomical character; that is to say, we cannot yet show that they depend upon any known or ascer- tained anatomical change of any portion of the system, including the brain, spinal marrow, and nerves. The general character of this singular group of affections, which we call neuroses, shows that, what- ever be the nature of the disease, the seat of it is in the nervous system ; but, in the present state of anatomical knowledge, we are not justified in saying what the condition of the nervous system is to which they owe their origin ; whether it is an organic change at all, or whether, supposing such a change to exist, its amount is proportionate to the violence of the symptoms. Even the results hitherto obtained by the microscope have been chiefly negative ; the microscope has added but little to what was before known on those subjects. I may state here, lest you should fall into a misapprehension, that I do not wish you to believe that organic change is not found in any of these diseases. The fact is, that in many of them such does exist; but when we come to inquire what those organic changes are, we find that they are so FEVERS AND NEUROSES. 23 inconstant, so variable, frequently so similar in opposite diseases, that they have hitherto altogether failed to throw any positive light upon the subject. This, then, is the second class of diseases; the first class having an anatomical character, the second having no anatomical character. Now we come to the third class, which comprises fevers. Fevers, as we have already said, have no anatomical character. Then, it will be asked, how do they differ from the neuroses? As far as we know, and strictly speaking, they differ very little ; but there is this feature con- nected with them, that fever seems to be a special condition of life which is to exist for a certain time, and then to cease— that is to say, it is under the law of periodicity; and in this respect the phenomena of fevers differ very much from those of the pure neuroses. There are other differences, too, between fevers and neuroses. It is quite true that in a large number of fevers death may take place without any organic change that we can demonstrate anatomically; but it is true, on the other hand, that in a large number of cases there is a tendency to the development of what are to be designated the secon- dary lesions of the disease. Thus, if we compare these two classes, the neuroses, which are not fevers, and the fevers properly so called, we find this great difference, that among the former (as for example in hydrophobia) we do not see any tendency to the development of ulcers of the intestine; in epilepsy we do not find any tendency to the development of bronchial diseases; in mania we do not see a cutaneous eruption ; in convulsions we do not find any of these various organic changes produced. This tendency, then, to generate or pro- duce local anatomical changes secondary to the fever is another re- markable distinction between this class of affections and the pure neuroses. There is a third very remarkable distinction between them. Fevers — using the term in a general sense, embracing, as I have already pointed out, a great number of essential diseases, as the exanthemata, typhus, plague, and yellow fever — are capable of being transmitted by contact or by vicinity; many of them — J believe almost all— are more or less contagious. So that in their subjection to the law of periodicity, in their liability to generate or produce various organic changes in different parts of the system, and in their transmissibility by contagion, we have three very important distinctive characters, although we cannot reduce them to an anatomical expression. A great deal has been written on the subject of the proximate cause of fever, and theory upon theory has been promulgated. We are, however, at this moment as ignorant of the proximate cause of 24 LECTURES ON FEVER. fever as we were in the time of Cuilen, or even long before him. It may be expected, however, looking at the advance of medical knowledge, that the proximate cause or causes of fever will yet be discovered ; but it is a general and justifiable opinion that essential fevers result, in most cases, from the introduction of a poison into the system. The whole of the phenomena of poisoning by organic matter seem to point out a close analogy between fevers and those diseases in which a poison is introduced into the system. If a man who is in perfect health is exposed to the contagion of syphilis, in a short time his system becomes a laboratory for the formation of syphilitic poison, and he is capable of communicating the disease. As far as we can form a judgment on this question we may say that there is a very close analogy indeed between fevers and toxic diseases, whether they be fevers which are the result of contagion or not; and in this way we see a connecting link between fevers, which we call acute diseases, and diseases which are neither acute nor febrile. Thus, for example, we do not say that a patient who is labouring under syphilis, which he has caught by contagion, is in fever; but he is, nevertheless, under a condition which, so far as the chemico-vital state of his body is con- cerned, is somewhat analogous to fever ; that is to say, his system has received a poison, and having received that poison, it seems to work upon it, or the poison to work on the system, and the result is that the system becomes a generator of the same poison that it has re- ceived. Now let us go a little further into this subject. I might give various other illustrations; and, indeed, I think you will find that some unexpected analogies will arise in this matter, and that you will even perceive an analogy between two such opposite diseases — such dissimilar diseases as typhus fever and pulmonary consumption. For there can hardly be a doubt that, under certain circumstances, tuber- cular matter introduced into the system acts like contagious matter, and that it produces a development of tubercular disease in the system thus infected. Such cases, then, may be considered as examples, if you will, of very chronic fevers, long-continued fevers, and fevers which are not, apparently at least, under the influence of the law of periodicity. I am perfectly persuaded that the more we study that class of diseases, which seems to be general rather than local, we shall find that the possibility of contagion will be more and more exhibited. I am strongly of opinion that the majority of the acute essential dis- eases are contagious, and I think it certain that there are other diseases also which we do not call fevers that are contagious. It is hardly possible to doubt the contagiousness of cholera ; and we may go still FEVERS AND TOXIC DISEASES. 25 further, and extend the possibility of contagiousness even to such dis- eases as tubercular affections, and perhaps even further. We know that scarlatina, measles, and smallpox are generally con- stant in their phenomena, and especially in the phenomena of their secondary changes — so much so that in them the secondary change is taken as a distinctive mark of the disease. These affections are probably, as I said before, more directly contagious; and it becomes a question whether this may arise from the circumstance that the matter of contagion in these cases is more elaborated — is perhaps more perfect according to its kind — or whether greater facilities are afforded for the conveyance of contagious matter during the desqua- mative processes so common in these diseases. The patient who con- tracts the disease is very much in the same position as a person who contracts syphilis; that is to say, that an organic poison of a special kind, whose essential characters, however, are so subtle as to escape chemical investigation, has been presented to his system and has affected him. The phenomena of typhus and typhoid are more variable ; and this may arise from the want of constancy in the exciting cause. We can hardly suppose a man to get smallpox unless he has been infected by another who has had smallpox. But continued fever, or typhus fever, seems capable of being produced by a great number of causes, or, if I may so speak, by a number of imperfectly developed or imperfectly acting causes, and these, of course, may be infinitely various. We also see this very curious difference between typhus fever and the exanthemata, that while among exanthemata, so far as we know, the one exciting cause produces its own disease — the exciting cause of smallpox producing smallpox, that of scarlatina pro- ducing scarlatina, that of measles producing measles — this does not seem to be the case with respect to fever. For here is one of the most important and interesting facts connected with the entire subject, that the same exciting cause — at least as far as we can see of it — is capable of producing different kinds of fever in different persons. This great fact has not been sufficiently dwelt on by the various writers on fever on the Continent and in England, especially by that class of men whose object seems to have been to make themselves classifiers of diseases — makers of classifications — at which nature laughs. Here is another of the great facts which show the inexpediency of drawing hard and fast lines of distinction between what are termed typhus fever and typhoid lever — that the one exciting cause will in one person produce one form of fever and in anotheradifferent form of fever. Now, we see nothing of this sort in the exanthemata. What may be the reason of this it is diificult to say; and we explain it very often by 26 LECTURES ON FEVER. expressing the fact in different words. It is supposed that it may be due to some variation in the state of receptivity of the body at the time. For in the production of the effect of the poison there are two elements: first, the nature and composition of the poison which is to act; and, next, the chemico-vital state of the body which is to be acted on. The two causes combined produce the result — -fever. But if, the cause being the same, the bodies be in different states, we may expect dif- ferent kinds of fevers; and this is all that we can say on the subject. Now let me address especially the junior members of the class, or those who have hitherto worked exclusively in the surgical wards. I want them to look on the local acute diseases of fever as they would look on the pustules of smallpox, the efflorescence of erysipelas, or the eruption in measles or scarlatina. In these maladies the manifest local disease most commonly affects the skin, but is clearly secondary to a specific morbid state of the system. It runs its course and subsides spontaneously, and unless in exceptional cases the constitutional dis- turbance subsides with it. Now, this seems to be the case in the secondary affections of fever, whether they be attended with anatomical change or be simply neu- rotic, whether the head, chest, or abdomen shows signs of disease. This latter is the product of the essential condition — that is, of the fever — and not its cause. You may meet cases where but one cavity is affected, even throughout the fever, where the three cavities are simultaneously engaged, where they are severally attacked, or where, in the whole course of the fever, there is no anatomical change. Now, what I want you to believe, and what, when your actual ex- perience of successive epidemics has been obtained, you cannot help believing, is, that as regards these secondary diseases, there is no con- stancy in their production — none as to amount, none as to intensity — and you may add, as to their combination and even their seat. Im- portant though they may be, frequent as certain forms of them are in certain epidemics or in certain localities, they may be looked on more in the light of accidents than of constant occurrences. They may be occasionally so extensive and so intense as that death may be probably attributed to them; while, on the other hand, their amount may be very trifling, and have no proportion to the severity of the general malady. In fact, it is impossible to predicate what course the secondary disease may take from spontaneous and some- times sudden retrocession to extreme disorganization. Thus the affection of the lung may vary from a slight to a dangerous degree of bronchial irritation, with congestion, causing extensive and rapid consolidation, and even a fatal sphacelus. Or there may be a great CONTAGION. 27 development of tubercle, either confined to the lung or engaging many other organs. Again, a rapid consolidation may take place — generally, as it were, silently — and attended by a cessation of the fever. We shall return to this when discussing the pulmonary complications. So also you will find great variations in the nature and intensity of the abdominal affections, from slight partial congestion, with or with- out deposit in the mucous glands of the intestine, to extreme relaxa- tion, softening, and perforation of the tube — it may be in many places with or without general acute peritonitis — or, as certain cases in the epidemic in 1827, there may be numerous intussusceptions, great con- gestion and enlargement, with softening of the spleen ; and, though the intestinal suffering be extreme, even without ulceration or per- foration of the tube. Now, gentlemen, what I wish you to bear in mind is, that the re- lation between the anatomical states of organs in fevers is a variable one, whether as regards the seat, the combination, the intensity of the affection, or the time of its appearance, or its effect on the general malady. Every great epidemic of fever, of whatever kind, must be studied first separately, and then comparatively, and you will find that the history of fever is a much wider subject than you might infer from books. LEGTURE IV. Contagion — Exclusive doctrines are to be deprecated — Endemic disease arises inde- pendently of contact — The numerical system of Louis fails in practical medicine — Evidence in favour of contagion from the Doctrine of Chances — Investigations of Dr. Whitley Stokes and the Bishop of Cloyne ; with Dr. Paget's remarks thereon — Variation in the degree of contagiousness of acute essential diseases. As I have said, a striking difference of fevers, compared with the pure neuroses and the structural diseases, is their contagious nature. With regard to this characteristic, medical opinion has been long divided ; and I would advise you, as a general rule, not to range your- selves among the advocates of any exclusive doctrine. You are not, therefore, to stand in the false position of men who are fighting for a particular doctrine, whether they be contagionists or non-contagionists. Should you do so, your mind will be occupied with the excitement of controversy rather than with the search for truth. You will become 28 LECTURES ON FEVER. advocates, while you cease to be inquirers, and once this change occurs in the mind of the observer, he loses caste in the ranks of science. The advocates of an exclusive doctrine on each side of this great question are able to produce many facts in evidence of their particular views. The facts thus brought forward may be, and probably are, in each case true; but the conclusions drawn from them may not be warranted. It would thus be wrong to infer that a disease was not contagious from the failure of evidence of its communication even in many instances. Equally illogical would be the deduction that a dis- ease arose only by contagion, even where multiplied examples of such an origin could be appealed to. There can be no doubt that disease has originated, and may originate, without contagion. This must be obvious to every man. Again, we see a vast number of cases in which disease is endemic. I need scarcely allude to the common case of ague. There are certain districts where ague is constantly produced, and where, if a man who has not had ague goes, and is not in contact with any human being whatever, he will, almost certainly, get the disease. Here, then, clearly, there has been disease independently produced, or at least without human contagion. There are certain districts in South America and in the West Indies, vast districts on the coast of Africa, forest districts in Hindostan, where, if a man sleeps for a single night — although we will suppose him to be alone, without any companions but the wild beasts of the forest — he will get some form of fever. We see also, if we look at the records of medicine, unquestionably even within the later periods of the world's history, the appearance of new diseases, totally new diseases. So that we cannot at all deny that' disease may be generated, and that it may spread without the interven- tion of human contagion. We must believe, I say, in the origin of dis- eases under some exciting cause; but that exciting cause need not be human contagion. On the other hand, innumerable facts show that fever existing in the system is capable of being propagated from one man to another; that it is, in fact, a contagious disease in the strictest sense; and this transmission of the disease may not be merely by contact, but by vicinity — within, it is true, a limited space. Now, the facts which we must rely on to impress this doctrine of contagion on your mind, when you come to examine them, will appear less direct than you might suppose. A great number of men who have written on this subject were really but ill-instructed in the rules of logic; they have not been trained to think properly and argue correctly on the subjects they were considering. For instance, it was a great object with a number of the French school, especially with the disciples of CONTAGION. 29 Broussais and advocates of the physiological doctrine, to establish the non-contagiousness of disease. For the doctrine of contagion implies essentiality; and the physiological doctrine was opposed to all essen- tiality. According to this doctrine, there was no such thing as essen- tial disease. Every disease was local and inflammatory; every fever was symptomatic. Therefore, in their anxiety to overturn essen- tialism, they found this outwork, as it were, of contagion, which should be carried. And nothing can be more singular, or, I may say, heroical, than the efforts which a number of the French physicians made to establish the non-contagiousness even of the most contagious diseases. Many of them went out to the Levant and exposed themselves pur- posely to the contagion of plague — put on the clothes of persons who were labouring under it; slept in the beds with plague patients; inocu- lated themselves with the matter from the buboes of persons labour- ing under the disease, in some instances actually inoculated themselves with the blood of plague patients. "Well, in many cases these experi- menters did not take the plague, and this fact is still relied upon as a proof of the non-contagiousness of plague and of fever generally. But you will at once see how very inconsequential these experiments are. Here are four or five cases of failure of contagion, and as well might you argue that corn does not grow from seed because one grain sown in the earth will sometimes fail to produce the plant. I may state here, however, that some of these investigators paid the terrible penalty of death in their zeal for science, for they did take the plague and were lost. Among the direct facts which satisfy our minds as to the contagious nature of fever are the circumstances attending its spread through large masses of people. I need hardly here allude to the singularly forcible argument in favour of contagion which may be drawn from the frightful mortality of our Irish medical brethren in the years of 1847 and 1848. This subject I have already alluded to in the theatre of the Meath Hospital, and it is one which we can hardly look back upon without shuddering. The simple fact alone of the mortality of that class of individuals who are most exposed to the disease, furnishes an argu- ment in favour of contagion which we would but weaken by any observations upon it. There is a mode of dealing with the indirect evidence for contagion, to which I shall now draw your attention. You all know that Pro- fessor Louis, of Paris, founded what he terms the numerical s}'stem of medical investigation; that is to say, he attempted to reduce the facts of medicine to numerical expression ; so that we should be able, as he supposed, to make medicine an almost exact science. My opinion, 30 LECTURES ON FEVER. I may state, generally speaking, on the subject is, that for the establish- ment of all that part of medicine which consists in fixing the data of physical diagnosis, the frequency or infrequency of certain pathological changes and matters of that kind, the numerical system is infinitely valuable; but that we cannot, or have not yet been able to apply it so as to furnish rules of treatment. For the object of the numerical physician and that of the practical physician — if I may make use of such a distinction — are different. The object of the numerical phy- sician is to ascertain a rule of treatment which will cure the greatest number of cases out of a given number; but that should not be your object, or that of practical physicians. It is very well to know that such results have been obtained; but it does not follow that you are to act on them. Your course is not blindly to adopt the formula founded on numerical data when it is shown that by its use you can cure the greatest number out of a given number; your object is to cure the diseases of A, B, or C, as they may come before you. And you are not to neglect what you believe to be right in the case of A, B, or C, because you have this array of figures declaring to you that such and such a course, different from that you may be about to pursue, is the rule for saving the greatest number of lives out of a given number. But we may safely use numbers in a different way — as, for example, in investigating the data of a particular doctrine. My father, when Professor of the Practice of Medicine in the Royal College of Surgeons, directed his attention very much to the subject of contagion. He was a strong advocate of the doctrine of contagion. Perhaps he went too far in his belief in the exclusiveness of this doctrine. Perhaps, also, he went too far in denying the views of the epidemists, or of the non-contagionists. However, that hasxHothing to say to the present question. He thought that, in looking at the general circumstances which attend the spread of an epidemic in this country, the probabilities for or against the doctrine of contagion might be submitted to calculation. One of his most intimate friends was the late Dr. Brinkley, Bishop of Cloyne, who was at one time the Astronomer-Royal of Ireland. He was admittedly one of the very first mathematicians of his day, and especially skilled in that difficult part of mathematical investigation — the Doctrine of Chances. In the progress of an epidemic in Ireland (and doubtless also in other countries) in a family of twelve persons the disease has been known to attack eleven out of the twelve. In some cases, the passing of the fever through so large a proportion as eleven individuals out of twelve has taken a very considerable period of time, as you may readily understand. It has taken about three months to go through CONTAGION. 31 them all. Now, my father proposed these two problems to the Bishop of Cloyne for solution: — 1st. An epidemic prevails so severely that one person out of seven sickens. A family of twelve is selected in a particular district before the epidemic has visited it. What is the chance that eleven out of that family will take the disease, supposing the sickness of one of the family does not promote the sickening of another — that is, supposing the disease not to be contagious, and supposing the family to be not unusually liable to the disease ? The answer furnished by Dr. Brinkley was, that the probability against such an event is 189,600,000 to 1. That is a very singular and extra- ordinary result. 2d. The same general conditions being assumed, and also that the number of inhabitants of a district is 7000, what is the chance that in a family of twelve within the district eleven will sicken ? Answer : The chance then is 300,000 to 1 that no family of twelve persons in a population of 7000 will have eleven persons sick. These numbers furnish proofs so convincing of the truth of the doctrine of contagion, though by no means in an exclusive sense, that it is hardly necessary to go further. The facts on which they were based are ascertained facts; they have been not uncommon facts in epi- demic fever; but, recollecting this, the chances against their happen- ing, if the disease were not contagious, would be 189,600,000 to 1 in the one case, and 300,000 to 1 in the other. On this subject I have had the honour of receiving a letter from Dr. Paget, of Cambridge; and I would not be doing justice to you, or to the question generally, if I did not state the objection made by this eminent physician, as to the soundness of the conclusions in favour of contagion, which appear deducible from these calculations. Dr. Paget observes that the form in which the problems are stated excludes the consideration of all local influences except contagion; in this he is perfectly correct. He considers that had this element of local influence, besides contagion, been included, it must necessarily have diminished, by whatever was its real value, the overwhelming result which the calculations, as they now stand, give in favour of contagion. But even Dr. Paget himself admits that — taking the case of the second calcu- lation — if the consequence of these deductions on the score of local causes were to reduce the probability of 300,000 to 1 to that of 1000 to 1, yet this latter probability would be sufficient to carry con- viction to the mind of any candid person. He, however, observes that we have unhappily no means of estimating numerically the requisite deductions, no means of calculating the effect of noxious exhalations from decomposing organic substances, of bad food and other assignable causes, which have been supposed capable of pro- 32 LECTURES ON FEVER. moting the spread of fevers ; and be properly remarks that Bishop Brinkley's results include, with contagion, the possible effects not only of known but also of all unknown causes which may make an indi- vidual household more liable to fever than their neighbours. While I feel indebted to Dr. Paget for having drawn my attention to this point, and to the importance of noticing it, when the numerical value of these results is considered, I think it well to mention that in my father's " Observations on Contagion" there is nothing which would lead one to believe that he advocated that doctrine in an ex- clusive sense. His object in proposing the problems was to show the great probability in favour of the doctrine of contagion as one and a principal cause of epidemical disease, and this irrespective of the question whether or not other causes might be held to coexist. The result seems to establish the certainty of the existence of contagion as an important cause of the phenomena in question. The singular array of figures is valuable as establishing the fact that contagion has a real existence. The terms of the questions may be held to embrace all other possible causes of sickness. My opinion, however, is that in Ireland local influences have not that great importance either as generators or promoters of fever which some believe them to have. We must believe that the causes of fever, independent of mere con- tagion, are various in the extreme, that they are probably nume- rous and complicated, acting in combination rather than singly, and varying in their effects not only in consequence of their own properties and combinations, but also as regards the condition of the individual in whom fever is developed. Dr. Paget, in observing that our pathology of fever is not so perfect as to assure us that there are no exciting causes besides those which are commonly allowed, notices the comparative immunity of infants and persons above forty years of age from the typhoid fever with rose spots, and affections of Peyer's glands, etc., indicating that the constitution of the individual is an element in the question. You are then to understand that, while we believe in the contagious nature of fever as an established fact, we do not go the length of saying that all cases of fever originate by contagion. In the present state of knowledge we must, I think, admit that certain combinations of physical circumstances may produce fever, either in a single case or in masses of men. It is hardly possible to gainsay this; but it is at least as well if not better proved that this fever is capable of being com- municated by actual contact, or by vicinity, from one individual to another. If we look to other diseases which affect the whole economy, we CONTAGION. 33 find analogies between them and fever; so far, at least, that in them a morbid condition exists which reveals itself in two ways: one, a state of general ill-health; and the other, the production of local and specific alterations. Take, for example, tubercle and syphilis. The last of these is, at all events, contagious; and though we can hardly show any mode of its production except by communication from one person to another, yet we must believe that at one time causes independent of such a mode of communication did exist, and were capable of originating the disease; and it may be that, as the world advances, and the general exciting causes of fever are diminished, or perhaps removed, this disease too, like syphilis, may only be pro- duced and exist by means of its communication from one person to another; and we may hope that such a state of things would be a step to the extinction of fever, at least as a disease affecting communities of men. If it be true that we may admit two phases in the history of acute essential diseases, one in which they are not only communicable, but capable of original production by causes independent of contact with the sick, and the other when these latter causes ceased to operate, and the disease is reduced simply to a special condition, which can be communicated only by contact, it is easy to perceive that, so far as prevention and ultimate extinction are concerned, the difficulties attendant on the matter will be greatly diminished. Let us assume that, so far as the cessation of the operation of general external causes is concerned, variola and syphilis are similarly circumstanced, and we may hope, from what has occurred with respect to the former dis- ease, that a similar diminution of fever may yet be attained, when it has at last passed into the condition of a merely contagious disease. That almost all cases of acute essential disease are contagious I have long believed. The amount or degree of contagiousness varies according to many circumstances, such as the nature of the malady, the amount of exposure, the physical condition of those so exposed, and the character of the epidemic. There can be no doubt that in different epidemics — apparently of similar diseases — the character of contagiousness varies remarkably, and I am glad to perceive that modern British authorities now admit that even typhoid or enteric fever may be propagated by contagion. "Some physicians," writes my father, 1 " in arguing against the con- tagious nature of certain fevers, have ventured on the adoption of a principle which appears to me very untenable — namely, that a dis- 1 Observations on Contagion, p. 25. 34 LECTURES ON FEVER. ease can have but one cause — and hence they infer that the advocates of contagion, instead of supposing, as they do at present, that contagion is the general cause of fevers, with which famine, filth, damp, or cold co operate singly or collectively, should suppose that one only of these causes can be the true cause of every particular disease, and that the admission that other causes contribute to disease is in fact a confession that contagion does not." For contagious disease, such as typhus or typhoid, though it may occasionally attack individuals of the oppulent classes, runs like wild- fire through an indigent and unhealthy population. The power of resistance is lessened, and all the evils of the asthenic conditions are increased. LECTURE V. Causes of Fevee — Preventive and Curative Medicine contrasted — Risk of error in limiting the number of the cures of disease — The correlation and the convertibility of disease two important questions, the answers to which are not as yet fully or satis- factorily determined. With respect to those causes which may be held to be capable of exciting fever, irrespective of contagion, I have only to say that as yet we know but little about them; and we have the highest authority for believing that the origin of epidemics is one of the most obscure and difficult subjects in the whole range of physical inquiry. But I cannot help expressing my belief that too much stress has been laid upon the effects of miasmata resulting from imperfect drainage, or the want of ventilation and of public cleanliness in general. No one will for a moment suppose that I wish to teach that these influences do not act in deteriorating the physical health and moral condition of a people, and in thus increasing the mortality of any existing epidemic, and that their removal is not an imperative duty of every government and community. For some years past great attention has been paid in England and on the Continent, especially in Germany, to sanitary science — that is to say, to Preventive as distinguished from Curative Medicine. If we compare the relative importance of these two great branches of medi- cal science, it seems true that a greater value should be attached to the first than to the second branch, and for this reason, that the well- being of infinitely greater numbers of mankind depends more on Preventive than on Curative Medicine. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE. 35 The great end of the former is to preserve the health of the masses of mankind so as to prevent or to diminish the necessity of the latter. The one is a matter to be dealt with by a large and wise legislative code ; the other is dependent on the slow advance of medical science, and on the individual character and attainments of those who are to carry it out. The one embraces everything, as Dr. Acland has well shown, which relates to the physical and the moral well-being of nations, 1 the grinding of the poor, the consumption of human life, as it were fuel for the production of wealth. Selfishness, indulgence, unrestrained vice, and every cause which tends to deteriorate the body come within its extended scope. Its object is the health and the happiness of our fellow-creatures. Its rules are plain and patent to all, and depend not on vexed questions of difficult science; so that it promises to be the noblest pursuit open to human beings, and he would be a bold man who dared attempt to predicate its triumphs or to limit its results. The occurrence and the spreading of epidemical disease have long engaged the attention of advocates of sanitary reform ; but it does not appear that as yet the difficulties connected with these questions can be said to have been at all satisfactorily solved, even though the im- portance of sanitary measures be frankly admitted. The paramount doctrine which has prevailed in England ascribes epidemics to want of cleanliness, overcrowding, deficient or impure air and water supply, imperfect drainage, and so on; while the cessa- tion of local outbreaks of disease after the adoption of a sanitary reform is appealed to in proof that the evils in question arose solely from removable influences. But the argument is defective — it is like that of the therapeutists as regards essential diseases, which run their ap- pointed course and then spontaneously disappear. Epidemics of fever in this way resemble isolated cases. They also have their periods of invasion, of maturity, and of decadence, and the subsidence of an epi- demic is in many instances by no means traceable to the adoption of certain sanitary measures. The experience of all great epidemics establishes this fact. There is, however, one theory or doctrine which underlies the whole history of British sanitary reform, and this is — that many, if not all, forms of endernical or of epidemical disease can be traced to some preventable or removable cause, and that by putting a stop to over- crowding, and by improving the quality of the water and the air in a locality, we may prevent the occurrence of such afflictions. 1 National Health. By Henry W. Acland, F.R.S., Regius Professor of Medicine in the University of Oxford, etc. etc. 1871. 36 LECTURES ON FEVER. I need not here point out to you the tendency which exists in many minds to attribute great phenomena to too limited a cause or causes. Thus, for example, some form of essential disease arises and spreads in a particular locality. This is inspected, imperfect sewerage is dis- covered, and the evil abated by the adoption of proper measures. Then the sanitarians triumphantly appeal to the circumstances as proving that the outbreak was the direct result of the alleged nui- sances, and perhaps of them alone. By this line of argument many sanitarians of that class who have not received a scientific education, and who know but little of the history of disease, hold that such unwholesome and removable in- fluences may originate diseases which are themselves dissimilar. But the question before us is, Are those influences in this country the sole or the chief causes of fever? It is difficult to believe that they are, because in Ireland, not only in the isolated dwellings of the poor which are scattered over the face of the country, but in the towns also, all those causes which result from the imperfect drainage of dwellings, from the accumulations of decomposing organic matters in their vi- cinity, and from imperfect ventilation, are, I regret to say, but too constant and too general; and yet the production of fever, whether spo- radically or epidemically, is inconstant and irregular in the highest degree. Why should these causes produce fever at one time and not at another? Why should districts remain for years free, or compara- tively free, from fever, while the supposed exciting causes remain in full force? or, again, why if the cause be constant, should the epi- demic character of the fever vary? We may say, excluding the con- sideration of isolated cases, that each epidemic has a special or pre- dominant character; thus, the great epidemic of 1826 and 1827 was very different from the epidemic which preceded it in 1818, and from those which followed it in 1836 and in 1847. It was in the epidemic of 1826-27 that we observed the almost universal prevalence of the secondary disease of the intestine; perforations of the intestinal tube were common; and yet, since that period, such an accident is rarely met with, either in the fever itself or during the period of con- valescence. It was at that time, too, that those singular and fatal cases of yellow fever, to which we shall have to allude, occurred intercurrently. In this fever, also, termination by well-marked crisis was commonly observed, a circumstance which is comparatively rare in the epidemics of maculated typhus in this country. I do not put forward these views as in any way original, for Dr. Graves long held the opinion, and taught it in this theatre, that something more than the effect of local causes, as the term is com- graves' views as to causes of typhus. 87 monly understood, was necessary to explain the occurrence of epi- demics in Ireland. Let me read to you a quotation from his seventh lecture, one of those devoted to the consideration of fever: 1 "That fever, in Ireland at least, depends on some general atmospheric change which affects the whole island simultaneously, independent of situa- tion, aspect, height above the level of the sea, dryness or moisture of the soil, or any other circumstance connected with mere locality, is proved by the fact, that when typhus begins to increase notably in the Dublin hospitals, we may always rest assured that a nearly simulta- neous increase of fever will be observed at Cork, Gal way, Limerick, and Belfast. For a considerable period there was a great tendency among physicians to refer the origin of typhus, and of almost every variety of fever, to malaria or unwholesome emanations from the soil, produced by the decomposition of vegetable matter. In Ireland facts do not bear out this hypothesis, for, as already stated, when an epidemic of fever has become established it breaks out simultaneously in situa- tions the most different, and in some where no such emanations can be supposed to exist ; thus I have seen a whole family affected in the telegraph situated at the summit of Killiney, a mountain formed of hard granite; and, indeed, the granite districts beyond Rathfarnham, Tallaght, and Killikee supply the Meath Hospital with its worst cases of typhus." Further on he observes, " Although ready to allow the general improvement of the health of the public from improved drain- age, improved habits of cleanliness, and increased comforts, yet I cannot admit that in Ireland we 'are to expect any notable diminu- tion of fever from the operation of these causes. In making this state- ment you are aware that I am opposing the usually prevalent opinion. The grounds for my dissent have been partly explained to you already, for, according to my observation, the increase or diminution of fever in Ireland arises from some unknown general atmospheric or, if you will, climatic influence, quite independent of locality, and consequently the most improved and thoroughly drained towns and country districts are quite as liable to epidemics of typhus as are the most neglected and marshy parts of our island. The causes which occasion these epidemics are, on the other hand, in no way connected with the notable variations of the seasons; for with us the ravages of typhus are observed some- times in dry, sometimes in rainy seasons, and its epidemics appear quite uninfluenced by the cold of winter or the heat of summer." . In Ireland the habits of the poor as to uncleanliness and over- 1 Clinical Lectures on the Practice of Medicine. Reprinted from the Second Edi- tion, 18b'4, p. 62. 38 LECTURES ON FEVER. crowding call for great reform, especially in our towns, where poverty, neglect, and overcrowding so often make them foci of endemical disease. The condition of our country towns and villages is simply deplorable, disgraceful to the local authorities, and in too many in- stances to the proprietary, frequently heedless as to the social and physical condition of those who live under them. Even the state of the metropolis, possessing a Public Health Committee, is shocking, and has been ably shown by Dr. Grimshaw in a recent communication to the Medical Society of the College of Physicians, Ireland. 1 What I wish you to believe, gentlemen, is, as I have already stated, that our fever is epidemic, proceeding from general but unknown causes — and also contagious ; and no one can deny that causes which would act in depressing the health and moral energy of a people, by rendering them less able to resist the effects of disease, would increase the general- mortality. The influence of bad ventilation and over- crowding I need not here dwell on; nor, on the other hand, need I occupy your time with more arguments to establish the truth of the doctrine of contagion. You will find in the writings of Sir Robert Christison, of Dr. Murchison, and of Dr. Graves convincing evidences on these points; and let me again refer to the great argument drawn from the liability to contract fever observed among the medical prac- titioners of Ireland, especially in the epidemic of 1847. The occurrence of offensive odours proceeding from the putrescence of organic matter naturally led to the widespread idea that the ob- jectionable smell was the exciting cause of sickness, and that all sani- tarians had to do was to remove the sources of air and water pollu- tion. But though the researches of Murchison and of Sir William Jenner go far to connect what has been called typhoid or enteric fever with the existence of noxious emanations from human excreta, other weighty questions remain. For example, Are these emanations the sole cause of the so-called pythogenic or enteric fever? Is this fever essentially different from typhus ? Can it be propagated by contagion, irrespective of exposure to putresence? Can it originate from the contagion of typhus? Is the relation of the local to the general malady the same as in typhus? And do the principles of treatment materially differ? Again, we must put to ourselves this most important query: Does sanitary reform, in providing a supply of pure air, pure water, sufficient drain- age, and so on, act by extinguishing the sources of epidemical disease ? 1 That, notwithstanding, the presence of filth does not itself presuppose the presence of fever will appear from the facts relative to certain places in the country districts of Ireland, which will he found iu Appendix A. CORRELATION AND CONVERTIBILITY. 39 Or is it that by the consequent improvement of the health of the population the community is better able to resist illness, be it con- tagious or non-contagious, and to lessen its severity when it does supervene? This, I apprehend, is, in the present state of our knowledge, the safe and practical way in which to regard these all-important questions. Civilization demands that all deleterious influences, all that offends the senses, should be removed or checked, and the population of a country placed under the most favourable sanitary conditions, es- pecially as to its supply of air, water, food, and clothing; but the sub- ject is a wide one, and embraces far more than the actual origin of endemical or even epidemical disease. With reference to the presumed origin of that form of fever called by Dr. Murchison the Pytho genie Fever, I would warn you, without in the slightest degree throwing doubt on the value of his researches, not to follow the system of attributing complex phenomena, or states of things, to a single cause, or to a too limited number of causes. " This supposition of a single cause of the effects we witness is quite unsupported by nature. Every animal, every plant, every rock, requires for its production the co operation of many causes that we know of, and most probably of many more that we have not yet dis- covered. All nature depends ultimately upon a single cause, but it has pleased that Almighty Cause that the effects which concern us immediately should arise from the co-operation of several of His creatures." 1 There is another habit against which I would put you on your guard : the one, namely, of holding that every disease of which a description appears in our nosologies is a peculiar and isolated entity, separated by hard and fast lines from any other either in its nature or in its exciting cause. The attention of physicians has been awakened to the doctrine of the correlation of zymotic diseases, 2 a doctrine which has been long suspected, to be true by practical men. Yet, it may be asked, can we not go a step further, and consider whether essential diseases are not convertible as well as correlative ? I think that before the session is over you will meet with instances which will incline you to arrive at both conclusions. Cases will occur to you, especially during the prevalence of an epidemic, where the disease seems to hesitate as to what particular character it will assume, so that it is often a matter of the most extreme difficulty, even 1 observations on Contagion. By Whitley Stokes, M.I). , p a 25. 2 Zymotic Diseases, their Correlation and Causation. By A. Wolff, F.R.C.S. Eug. 1872. 40 LECTURES ON FEVER. when an eruption is well out, to say to which of the exanthemata the individual case belongs. Under such circumstances the public used to regard it as a mark of ignorance if the attendant were unable to give an exact name to the malady, but they are more enlightened now. APPENDIX A. The following are some extracts of a letter from a gentleman of great ability and truthfulness, who holds an important public appoint- ment in the South of Ireland. He had been requested by the com- missioners of a town in that part of the country to inspect the state of the town and report on the works necessary for sewage improve- ment. It was about the year 1865, when there was some apprehension of an epidemic of cholera : — "I went," says this gentleman, "through every lane and street, and ex- amined all the tenements of every class in the latter end of January or beginning of February. There were no main sewers in any but the princi- pal streets, and none of these had them for their whole length. The lanes and alleys leading off from these streets were mostly very narrow, and- had no outfalls for sewerage discharge except surface channels, and very few of the houses had any back entrance; a good many had neither yards nor back entrances. But all had dung-pits. If not behind, they were contrived in the widest parts of the lanes by being sunk and inclosed with walls, so as to hold from 8 to 12 cubic yards of manure each. Where the tenement had not the 'easement' of a dung-pit or yard, or right to part of the common way, the manure was stored in the dwelling house. Most of the houses were thatched cabins, but several rows of two-storied houses were built, and a good many one-storied slated houses of small size were to be found con- taining four apartments. I discovered in one of these rows, which had very small backyards (not half the size of the house in any case), that the whole of the ground-floor, and part of the house, except the staircase and passage leading to it, were filled with manure (the scrapings of the roads and streets) tightly packed to the height of eight feet ; and in the rooms above there were two families living — one in each room. The manure had of course heated, and was steaming up through the chinks of a badly-laid floor, the under side of which was dripping wet from the the fermentation below. "In several of the rows having backyards the surface water was allowed to run through the whole length of the lane from yard to yard, and the occupier of the lowest tenement was looked upon as having the most valu- able holding of the whole lot, and something like the Chinese care of liquid manure was shown by extra mould or refuse being provided to absorb or soak it up. The parts of the town to which this description may apply covered about 25 acres, and almost every part of that surface was teeming with etfluvia from such decayed substances of every sort as are admitted to be of the most noxious kind, without any provision whatever for carrying off the putrid water which is always to be seen in so wet a climate as this. "The population is about 6000, of which two-thirds live in cabins fur- APPENDIX A. 41 nished with the inevitable dung-pit. These cabins contain 700 families at the least. The dung-pit averages 10 cubic yards in content, so that on 25 acres we have at least 7000 cubic yards of fetid matter, with 4000 people breathing the exhalation of such an accumulation as could not, I think, be found elsewhere in Ireland. " But nevertheless this town has always been a remarkably healthy place. There is a fever hospital which has not been full since the famine dysen- tery in 1847-8, and which is very frequently empty. There is no dislike on the part of the poor to go into this hospital, because it is not the work- house, so that the few fever cases that do occur arc quickly removed out of the crowded houses. "It was asked — 'How can such a state of things be? or how can it be accounted for that such good public health can exist amidst all this rotten- ness giving rise to the miasmata so well known as certain producers of fever and cholera?' I suggested that there were two great advantages in favour of health, namely: an ample supply of the very best water and smoky houses. The subsoil of the town is gravel and sand to a great depth, and in this there are many strong springs, the purest water being met with at 6 or 8 feet under the surface. The fuel used is all turf, and the blackened walls of the inside of the houses showed that the inhabitants lived in an atmosphere of peat smoke. I cannot help thinking that such smoke, pos- sessing as we know preserving or antiseptic properties, must act as a deodorizer and preventive against infection or malaria. " I asked one of the occupiers who lived over his dung-heap in an upper floor how he could expect to escape death by fever or cholera to himself or some of his family (a wife and five children), and his reply was, ' Sure we might as well be dead as never to have a bit of dung for the garden.' " Some legislator has said that 'Ireland is an anomaly ' — may be the san- itary statistics of this town are another proof of this." The inhabitants of this town escaped the endemical disease so common in other towns of the south of Ireland, perhaps because, in addition to the pure water and turf smoke, an intimacy with malaria for many generations had at last made them insusceptible to it. Dr. Pratt, in a paper read before the Surgical Society of Ireland, recently touched upon this same question. After alluding to the widely accepted theory of the actual origin of fever, as proceeding from the decomposition of animal and vegetable matter, he observes that "after an experience of nearly a quarter of a century as an Irish dispensary medical officer, it is his firm conviction that these agencies alone considered cannot be productive of fever of any type. Were it otherwise, Ireland would before this have been depopulated from sea to sea. " " Among the Irish agricultural classes," he adds, " the farm yards are simply the open spaces either in the front of their dwellings or close behind, the offices, cow-houses, stables, etc., forming a component part of them ; the farm-yard manure carefully heaped, in many in- stances up to the very door, and in such a way that it often becomes a problem to the perplexed doctor, whose aid is desired within, how 42 LECTURES ON FEVER. to effect an approach (especially when called on in the dead of night) without sticking ankle deep in mire or filth, or, perhaps, coming to a worse grief in the shape of a souse in a slough of despond. "Such is the state of affairs during the winter months. In the hot weather of summer the pits from which the accumulated manure has been removed to the farm, serve as receptacles for slops and refuse of all sorts thrown from the houses. These slops, fermenting in warm weather, produce a green stagnant pool. The gases generated show themselves as bubbles on the surface, which in due time burst, and, of course, discharge their supposed noxious contents in the immediate vicinity of the dwelling, with all its inmates, old and young." Dr. Pratt observes that, in such places, a case of fever, of any type, rarely occurs; the average length of life is high, and illness, except common colds and infantile diseases, is almost unknown. Even in instances where the peasantry live in a worse condition, the cattle, pigs, and poultry occupying the same room, and the refuse being swept into a pit close by the fireside, he has found the families hale and sound, and strangers to fever. LECTURE VI. Varieties of Feverrs observed (1) in different epidemics, (2) in the same epidemic, and (3) in members of the same family, living under the same conditions— This last-named fact is corroborative of the doctrine of the essentialism of fever — De- finition of the term epidemic character of fever — Outbreaks of 1818-19, 182G-27, and 1847 contrasted — Typhus and typhoid or enteric fever appear to be but species of the same genus — Contagiousness of typhoid fever — Dr. Flint's memoir — Principles of treatment of fever of any type must be based on an acquaintance with the law of periodicity, to which the disease is subject. The varieties of fever depend upon diverse circumstances. We may take, for instance, the disease in its epidemic character. It may be laid down as an axiom that no two epidemics of fever have been precisely similar as regards the character and aspect of the disease presented to our observation on the two occasions. No doubt in the history of a series of epidemics, extending over a space of many years, some — nay, many — cases analogous in symptoms, and even sim- ilar in their mode of termination and in their result, may come under our notice. Thus, if the outbreak of 1880 is compared with that of 1820, cases will be found recorded in the history of the morbility of the former year the counterparts of which, so far as relates to symp- EPIDEMICAL DIVERSITY OF FEVER-TYPE. 43 toms, sequelae, and result, may have been observed ten years before. Apart, however, from individual exceptions, when any two or more epidemics are taken into consideration, they will generally appear to differ widely one from another. But not only has this diversity of type and character been noticed in distinct epidemics, separated by intervals of time, but even in one and the same epidemic numerous cases have occurred, characterized by symptoms essentially distinct, and marked by as widely varied conditions of the bodily system. In one group of cases there will be present utter prostration of strength, and intense depression of vital energy; in another group we may observe abundant vitality and almost unimpaired muscular and nervous force. In the same epi- demic, again, fevers may vary in duration ; one lasting but five days, another not terminating till the fortieth or forty-fifth day, or even later. Once more, we find infinite variations as to the period of the essential disease at which secondary complications will show them- selves. In some cases the secondary affections in one or more organs may not become developed or apparent until after the twenty-first or even the forty-second day of the disease. The seat, too, of compli- cations may be in one set of cases the brain, in another the thorax, and in a third the abdomen. We may trace this Protean character of fever even further. That in two epidemics, separated it may be by a wide interval of time from each other, the type of the disease, its attendant phenomena, its com- plications, its duration, and so on, should vary much was perhaps not to be marvelled at. That even in the same epidemic the disease should present varying forms and characters is more remarkable, though still easy of comprehension. But we can carry our investigations a step further, and we shall meet with still more striking results. When fever appears in a family, living in some confined situation in a large city or town, in a badly ventilated dwelling, perhaps in the midst of an unwholesome and densely populated neighbourhood, several mem- bers of that family may be struck down by the disease. They may sicken simultaneously or one after the other, so that we are afforded an opportunity of witnessing the effect of the malady on them indi vidually. Under such circumstances it has been observed that a marked variety is presented in the condition of the several patients. One will have the disease in its severest form, another will experience but a mild attack ; some will suffer from protracted fever; others will go through an illness of the briefest duration ; one will have petechise, another will present no eruption: one will display critical phenomena, 44 LECTUEES ON FEVER. whilst another will recover without crisis of any kind ; one will have typhus, another typhoid, or even rheumatic, fever. Now this is a most remarkable fact, and one strongly corroborative of the doctrine of essentialism in fever. We might a priori suppose that where there existed a certain similarity in the physical and moral characteristics of persons so closely related by consanguinity, so alike in habits from living together, and so uniformly subjected to the same mode of life, those persons when exposed to the influence of one and the same poison or virus of contagious fever would present one and the same type of the disease. It is of the greatest importance, gentlemen, that you should devote your most attentive consideration to reflections such as these in your study of fever, in order that you may be prepared for any exigency arising from the varied and complex aspects in which the disease will present itself before you — in order that you may be duly armed and fitted to encounter the deadly, the subtle enemy you will have to meet. The constancy in variability of which I have just spoken in rela- tion to fever applies also to all forms of local epidemics. As in the case of individuals, so of epidemics, one outbreak of fever will be marked by profound prostration of the system, by a loss of strength requiring the exhibition of stimulants, while another will present evi- dences of a sthenic condition of the patients, calling for an exactly opposite mode of treatment. This is what is termed the epidemic character of the disease. I remember the fever of 1818 and 1819, the equally formidable outbreak of 1826 and 1827, and lastly the great epidemic of 1847. If we compare the first with the last of these vis- itations, we shall find that they possess many points of resemblance. Both were examples of severe typhus fever, both had maculae in patches, both were petechial. The epidemic of 1826-27 was of a milder but more diffusive type; in it vast numbers were indeed attack- ed by the fever, but the great and profound sinking of the system which prevailed in the other epidemics I have mentioned was not present in this. So widely spread was the last-named epidemic (that of 1826-27) that at the Meath Hospital we were obliged to have additional accom- modation for patients provided. Sheds were built, canvas tents were erected, their floors covered with hay, on which the crowds of patients conveyed to the hospital in carts were literally spilled out. I have seen as many as ten patients lying on the hay awaiting their turn to be attended to. In fact, so immense was the number of sufferers that it became impossible to bestow medical care upon them all ; indeed, a large number of them got no medicine whatever, but all received TYPHUS AND TYPHOID. 45 reasonable care and comfort. Abundance of whey was provided, and on this, without any farther treatment, numbers got well through the fever — as Dr. Rutty, speaking of the year 1739, quaintly observed, " abandoned to the use of whey and Grod's good providence." I doubt not that the mortality among those treated after this primitive fashion was not greater than that among the patients subjected to medical treatment secundum artem. It should be observed that there was more of an inflammatory character evinced in this epidemic, the skin being hot and dry, the pulse hard and full, etc. Fever, you are aware, has been somewhat arbitrarily divided into two classes, or placed under two great heads — typhus and typhoid. Typhus fever is held to take its origin from the vitiated air and the unhealthy condition of body resulting from the crowding together of masses of human beings, coupled, perhaps, with neglect of cleanliness, absence of proper ventilation, clothing, and food, and the prevalence of indolent and disorderly habits. The emanations arising from over- crowding, or ochlesis, as it is termed, doubtless predispose in an extra- ordinary degree to the outbreak and spread of this form of fever, a form of the disease which has received various titles — some from its connection with ochlesis, as camp fever, jail fever ; others from the peculiar morbid phenomena attending it, as putrid fever (when it dis- plays a tendency of the solids to run into decomposition) ; spotted fever (from the maculse or spots so frequently observed on the surface of the body in this form of disease) ; and others again from its well- known formidable character and too often fatal result, as typihus gravior, malignant fever, etc. Typhus also is regarded as being the more dangerous form of the disease, but I am by no means convinced that this opinion is correct. There is, however, one reason why this idea should be entertained by British physicians ; the epidemics of fever which have been most fatal in these countries have been of the typhus kind, whilst it may be said that we have had repeated visitations of the typhoid form of fever attended with a comparatively slight mortality. Typhus fever, when it comes, at once assumes the true epidemic character, whereas typhoid more frequently prevails endemically, and with less direct fatal results. Typhoid, enteric, or pythogenic fever is generally attributed to emanations from putrid matter, or, according to Dr. Budd, to the ex- posure to contagious matter contained in the evacuations of patients suffering under the disease. This contagious matter may be intro- duced into the .system either through the medium of the air in ;t gaseous form or by means of contaminated drinking water. Typhoid lever is 46 LECTURES ON FEVER. considered to be essentially an epidemic disease ; in other words, it may occur in particular situations. The opinion was almost univer- sally held that this form of fever was non-contagious, but the adherents to this doctrine are becoming less numerous of recent years. If it were a fact that typhoid fever was not a contagious disease, we should have a marked and important distinction at once established between it and typhus, but it is not so. I do not say that typhoid fever is so contagious as typhus, yet I will not admit that the former possesses the attribute of being non-communicable. I would strongly urge you, gentlemen, to be very cautious in admitting the line of distinction which authors have drawn between these forms of disease as regards the question of contagion, and you may depend upon it that the num- ber of diseases propagated by contagion is much greater than what is generally admitted. We can found no distinction between typhus and typhoid upon the circumstance that one of these fevers, as, for instance, typhus, is contagious and the other not. I have long be- lieved in the contagion of the non-petechial, or, if you will, the typhoid fever of this country. In the epidemic of 1826-27, to which I have before referred, and which was essentially an epidemic with the so- called anatomical characters of the typhoid disease, we had abundant proofs of contagion; and in this very hospital many of our most zealous students were at that time attacked with fever. It may be here observed, that although this epidemic was one essentially of the so-called typhoid form, characterized by absence of the symptoms of putrescence, by frequent relapses, by recovery, by crisis, and in very many cases by evidences of disease of the intestinal glands; yet the attendants on the sick, when they were themselves attacked, presented in many cases the symptoms of genuine typhus. It was during this epidemic that I contracted typhus fever; and shortly afterwards one of my clinical clerks, who had been distinguished for his zeal in his attendance on the sick, fell ill. We both had bad maculated typhus without any symptoms of dothinenteritis ; in my case the disease ran a course of fourteen days; and in neither instance was there any relapse. A very remarkable instance of the contagiousness of typhoid fever has been placed on record by Dr. Austin Flint, of Buffalo, United States, in a memoir "On the Transportation and Diffusion by Con- tagion of Typhoid Fever," published in 1852. In a small isolated community, consisting of nine families, at North Boston, county of Brie, New York, typhoid fever had been quite unknown up to the autumn of 1843. Indeed, in no part of the county of Erie was the disease known to have occurred up to the time mentioned. On the TYPHUS AND TYPHOID. 47 21st of September in that year, however, a young man from Warwick, Massachusetts, being on a journey westward, took lodgings at the tavern of North Boston, kept by a man named Fuller. He had been ill for several days, undoubtedly labouring under typhoid fever. He died on the 19th of October at the tavern, which was a place of daily resort for the members of seven families, with one exception living within a few rods of each other. One family, consisting of several persons, was on terms of hostility with the innkeeper, and so all inter- course was precluded. Twenty-three days after the arrival of the stranger, two members of the innkeeper's family were attacked with the disease from which he suffered. Subsequently five other cases occurred in this family. In all the other families, with one exception already noted, cases more or less numerous were observed within the space of about a month from the date of the case first developed after the stranger's arrival; and during this period more than one-half the population became affected. The family in which no case occurred was the only one of the seven which was not brought into direct con- tact with the disease. The other two families resided at a distance, and seemed to be out of the reach of infection. So extraordinary was this outbreak that the popular opinion in the neighbourhood was that the head of the family in feud with Fuller the innkeeper had poisoned a well used daily by the latter, and by six other families, of which five were attacked. That this opinion was not correct was proved by a careful examination of the water by two leading chemists of Buffalo, when it was found to be remarkably pure, " the only foreign ingredient detected being a small proportion of saccharine substance, which was explained by the fact that the vessel in which the water was transported had previously been used as a molasses jug. " Typhus, again, is said to be an essential disease, affecting the entire economy; whilst typhoid has been looked on as & non-essential, or merely a symptomatic affection. The inadmissibility of this view has already been, I trust, sufficiently indicated in a former lecture. Tt is a doctrine at variance with practical experience; it is a theory quite incompatible with observed facts. Owing to the ever-varying nature of fever, many of its secondary phenomena may or may not be present— we may have typhus without measly eruption or macular; we may have typhoid without diarrhoea, rose-spots, or any other symp- tom said to be pathognomonic. We are compelled to admit that pa- thological anatomy has failed as a means of pointing out any essential distinction between these two forms of fever. Anatomy, it is true, may reveal to us certain morbid changes and abnormal conditions in 48 LECTURES ON FEVER. different organs in many cases of either typhus or typhoid. But these alterations are only the results, not even the necessary or con- stant results, of the primary disease; and so they throw no light upon the object of our search — a vital distinction between the two fevers. Even as regards the presumed causes of the diseases — ochlesis, civic miasm, poverty, hunger, or cold — are not the conditions supposed to be requisite for the development of typhoid present in cases where typhus is generated by overcrowding? Are not filth, putrescence, impure water, and foul air probably existent in such a state of things ? Do these influences produce at one time pythogenic, and at another typhus, fever? Do they excite both diseases at once in the same indi- vidual? Does A get typhus, while B, exposed to the very same influ- ences, and under perfectly similar circumstances, contracts typhoid? The treatment of fever, whether it be typhus or typhoid, is reducible to a simple formula, and is essentially the same in both types ofdisease. We know of no cure for fever; no man has ever cured it. It is, how- ever, curable spontaneously. If you leave it to its own course, it is capable of curing itself. It will spontaneously subside. Remember- ing the law of periodicity, the great object of the physician should be to gain time, preserving the patient from the dangers which threaten him, which belong to this special state of life. If he can be kept alive to the 14th day, the 21st, the 36th, or even the 60th day, recovery will probably ensue. Every day, every hour of existence preserved and sustained is a clear gain. The risks that he runs are due to debil- ity or to the influence of the secondary affections. We, so to speak, cure the patient by preventing him from dying. We endeavour to gain our end by combating the exhaustion which threatens to prove fatal to him with food, with stimulants, and with tonics. We seek to obviate or to modify the dangers of the local diseases by meeting them as early as we can discover their presence, bearing in mind the depress- ing influence of the general malady. Herein lies the secret of the treatment of fever. We watch the progress of the disease throughout its varying phases; we meet by judicious treatment, as they arise, the symptoms of secondary and local malady; we sustain the system as far as practicable; we preserve the sufferer at the least expense to the constitution ; and we wait patiently until the hour shall strike when, in accordance with the mysterious law of periodicity, the fever shall have departed and convalescence shall have begun. RESEMBLANCES OF TYPHUS AND TYPHOID. 49 LECTURE VII. Points of Resemblance in the various forms of fever a more practical subject for investigation than their distinctions — As regards the principles of prognosis, diagno- sis, and the management, various forms of fever lose their separate and individual significance — Points of resemblance between typhus and typhoid — The famine fever in 1847 — Recapitulation. Referring to the last lecture, it may be observed that in these days the attention of investigators on fever has been directed rather to the distinctions between its various forms than to their points of resemblance, and yet it may be asked whether, looking at the end and object of the study of disease, the latter consideration is not the more important. Indeed, the more experience of essential disease a man acquires the less value he will attach to the classification of it, at least in these latitudes ; for though he will find that the mere nosological distinc- tions (as given in books) are abundant, yet the grounds of action in practice depend more on the general nature of disease than on its specific characters, which, though sufficiently well marked under certain circumstances, are not so fixed as to warrant the belief that they indicate an absolute speciality in disease. This seems more certain in those forms of essential disease which are classed under the general head of Continued Fevers, such as typhus, relapsing or famine fever, and the typhoid or enteric — the pythogenic fever of Dr. Murchison. There can be no doubt that in a fever hospital you will see various cases not presenting the same characters. One patient is prostrated at an early period of his illness, his nervous system much affected, the heart weak, and the skin covered with petechial spots, while in the next bed may be one with comparatively little of the nervous symptoms, without eruption, except a few rose spots on the front of the body, and with less prostration ; his condition does not seem so alarming as that of his neighbour, but it may be that his disease will prove fatal, while in the other case there will be a perfect recovery. Between these two cases you may find many other points of differ- ence in the history, the exciting cause, the amount of prostration, and the seat and apparent extent of local change. You may, if you will, call one of them typhus and the other typhoid, pythogenic, or enteric 4 50 LECTURES ON FEVER. fever. That will do no harm. The name of the disease would be an important question if it implied such a difference in nature as would call for a complete difference in treatment. But as regards the great principles of prognosis, diagnosis, and the management which will assist nature in the effort to throw off the disease, they are the same ; and. so far these cases, though they may individually differ, yet seem to belong to the same family. I have said that I hold the study of the resemblances or points of agreement among these diseases, to be of more value than that of their differences, and for this reason, that the former bears on the question of treatment much more than does that of their distinctions. Now, remembering that fever is a condition of which it cannot be said that there is any certain anatomical character, it may be held, even if we confine ourselves to but two forms — typhus and typhoid : — First: — that they are both essential fevers, in which the local dis- ease is secondary to, and produced by, the general ailment. Secondly: — that the general malady is influenced by the laws of periodicity. Thirdly : — that its symptoms may be modified by the local second- ary affections, as to their seat, complications, period of appearance, intensity, retrocession, and behaviour under treatment. Fourthly : — that in both diseases the local affections are inconstant as to seat, period of appearance, intensity, complication, and subsi- dence ; varying according to the locality, the duration of the malady, the epidemic character, the exciting causes, the habit of body, and the influence of treatment. Fifthly : — that both may exist, and even run their course, without the production of recognizable local disease. This appears to be more often true in the case of typhus than of the other forms of fever, yet even in the typhoid or enteric fever there is no constancy of relation between the symptoms and the local change, and in both the local diseases are inconstant in seat, amount, and time of appearance, and incompetent to explain the phenomena of the malady. Sixthly : — that these local diseases are, like the general affections, subject to the law of periodicity — that is, they spontaneously subside, sometimes before the disappearance of the fever, at other times after- wards. But when reactive irritation sets in, various structural changes may occur, and the fever originally essential may become more or less symptomatic. This we may see in very prolonged cases of typhoid. There are yet other points of resemblance, of which the most im- portant is that both forms of disease are contagious, though probably SPECIES, NOT GENEEA, OF FEVER. 51 in different degrees. This is now admitted by the best observers. Furthermore, there is a species of evidence more often attainable in an Irish than a British hospital. You know that we have not unfrequently in the wards the whole, or nearly the whole, of a family sick of fever. The patients have occupied the same dwelling, too often the same room, and they have sickened successively and within short intervals of time. It is difficult to believe but that there has been a similarity in the exciting cause of disease in all, and there is a strong probability that the sickness of one has promoted that of another. Now, in this group what do we find ? Is it that the same character of fever affects them all ? Nothing of the kind — one patient may be in maculated typhus; in another there is no eruption; in another the case is typhoid, or the so-called pythogenic or enteric fever; and so on among them. Even cases of rheumatic fever may occur. But this is not all ; second attacks arise, but these are not necessarily — not, I might say, even commonly — repetitions of the first ailment or group of symptoms. In the typhus fever patient they may be those of typhoid; in the non-maculated there may be abundant macula?. In the other cases similar circumstances occur, the second attack presenting types differing from the first ; one has a short fever, another a long one ; one a complicated, the other a comparatively simple attack ; one with predominance of cerebral, another with that of pulmonary symptoms, and another with all those of enteric or pythogenic fever ; one requiring stimulants in the second attack, though there was no failure of circulation in the first; and similar differences may be seen as to the remaining complications. Do not these facts point to the conclusion that there is but a slight tension, so to speak, in the individuality or separate characters of the various forms of fever, and that in their essence and from a practical point of view they may be looked on as species rather than genera — the genus being fever, that condition on which anatomical investiga- tions, in the words of Graves, throw but a negative light? I tell you — not that you are to look at every case of fever as similar in character, in complications — that would be bad teaching, as your experience would soon convince you — but that it is a condition much more various than you would suppose, were you to form your notions of it from books. Its many forms are closely related. The exciting causes of one may produce another; the secondary effects have not the con- stancy which authors describe in seat, in number, in complications, or in effect on the general malady. These forms of disease have all two great characters in common — essentiality and periodicity. Why they differ in general and local phenomena it is hard to say, but we 52 LECTURES ON FEVER. know little of the receptivity of the living body, the laws of the variations of that receptivity, and those which govern its results. This department of vital chemistry is still to be worked out, nor does the study of the apparent exciting causes of the various forms of fever give us much stronger grounds for belief in their essential differences. Dr. Murchison, in his treatise on the Continued Fevers of Great Britain, a work which is one of the greatest ornaments of En- glish medical literature, enters at length into the distinctions between typhus and the relapsing or famine fever, and labours to show that while the one can be traced to overcrowding, the cause of the other is destitution. Yet he admits the observations of Alison, David Smith , and Henry Kennedy, which show that in one epidemic, in the same family, even from the same bed, both forms of fever have been ob- served. In wide-spread epidemics, he observes, we may have at first relapsing fever only, then relapsing fever and typhus together, and, last of all, typhus alone. "Whatever be the explanation," he says, " the circumstance is remarkable; but it does not justify the conclusion that the two fevers are identical." 1 And he says further on : " As far as I know, the statement remains uncontroverted, that in all cases where fever can be proved to have been imported into a locality by a single case, typhus has produced typhus; and relapsing fever, relaps- ing fever." To a great extent the observations which I have offered as to the relationship between typhus and typhoid seem to apply to that between typhus and the relapsing or famine fever. I think the name of " Famine Fever" one of doubtful fitness. In the epidemic of 18A7-48, which followed the disastrous famine of Ireland, the contagious nature of the disease was too well established, as shown by the terrible mor- tality of the members of the medical profession, and of many of the country gentlemen. Now, if ever the characters of typhus were shown, it was then. Every form of continued fever occurred — in thousands of cases — relapsing fever, typhoid or enteric fever, and the worst form of typhus that could be seen. All the forms were con- tagious, and this, whether the subjects of the disease had or had not been exposed to destitution or overcrowding. The truth seems to be that, while every separate epidemic has more or less of a common character, all great epidemics (at least in this country) may be called mixed, so far as the occurrence of individual cases is concerned. All the circumstances which we have noted as to the relation of typhus to typhoid may be said to occur as to relapsing fever. 1 A Treatise on the Continued Fevers of Great Britain. Second ed. 1873, p. 342. TYPHUS AND RELAPSING FEVER. 53 Without discussing how much is owing to destitution and how much to the attendant overcrowding, whether two epidemic diseases run their courses pari passu, or whether the fever, of whatever form it may be, has been modified by the previous starvation — let us deal with some important facts observed in this hospital in the epidemic of 1847. Although, as might be expected, the number of deaths from famine within the precincts of Dublin, as compared with the country districts, was trifling, still we had not a few opportunities of observing the effects of famine in these wards. Many sufferers from want of food made their way into the city, and falling down exhausted in the streets, were conveyed by the police to the hospital. They had all a strange resemblance. The face — and indeed the whole of the bod}' — showed a dusky hue, the eyes were sunken and with little expression, the features pinched and marked by a profound melancholy; the surface was cool, either dry and shrivelled, or clammy, and in all cases the body exhaled a heavy earthy smell. These people were as a rule apathetic; they made no complaint, but seemed only anxious to be placed in bed and allowed to rest. They asked for neither food nor drink. There were no symptoms of fever, and the natural desire of all who saw them was to give a generous support. But it was speedily found that such a course was a dangerous — it might be said, a fatal one. In several cases animal food and wine seemed to act like a deadly poison, and even where a more cautious use of nutriment was adopted, the patients being fed as infants for days together until the collapse seemed to be overcome, the system would, as it were, explode into the very worst form of maculated typhus, in which death commonly occurred on the fifth day of the fever, and in some cases even earlier. And this is to be noted in relation to the reports of the relapsing fever as observed at the London Hospital in 1843, where the desire for food was general. Similar observations were made in Glasgow and elsewhere, and this craving appetite, not alone in the remission but in the paroxysm of the fever, is appealed to as evidence that the relapsing form of fever is really a famine fever. But whether the character of frequent recurrence of short attacks of fever be owing to the previous contamination of the system by starvation or not, we shall not discuss. Certain it is that relapses had been common in our wards after 1830. But to say that the epidemic character observed was that of a relapsing fever — 'namely, a short fever with intervals of apyrexia — is to give a very imperfect idea of the disease. Since then the typical relapsing fever — the five day fever — has been often met with, sometimes showing an epidemic tendency. 54 LECTURES ON FEVER. but in very many instances being apparently unconnected with desti- tution. I may observe that in such cases enlargement of the spleen was common, and that in no case did the exhibition of quinine in the intervals of the fever prevent the relapse. 1 But in Ireland an interesting circumstance in relation to the terri- ble famine fever was that, in a few years after the cessation of the epidemic of 1847, fever, which For so many years seemed rooted throughout the land, gradually disappeared to a singular degree. The numerous fever hospitals in the country towns were closed, dis- posed of, or otherwise utilized, and I remember a period of several years in which our wards were all but empty. We may leave to others to speculate on the cause of this. About this time the level of Lough Neagh, in the County Antrim, was much reduced by arterial drainage, and a large space of marshy ground on its shores rendered dry. Fever, which had been long pre- valent in this locality, was observed to have become very rare, and this was attributed to the drainage; yet it is more likely that the sub- sidence of the endemic typhus was but an example of the change which had occurred over the whole country. Let me recapitulate some of the leading points as to fever which cannot be too deeply engraved on your minds: — Its essentiality. Its contagiousness in various degrees. Its existence often independently of local or anatomical change. The relation of the local to the essential malady. The influence of the local malady upon the general fever. The inconstancy as to seat, time of appearance, number, impor- tance, and complication of the local or secondary affections, and their incompetence to explain or account for the pheno- mena of fever. The periodicity of these phenomena, seen not alone in the general malady, but more or less in the secondary affections. The occurrence of more than one form of fever in the same epi- demic. The speciality in character according to the epidemic. The similarity in the principles of treatment of the general malady and of the local changes. These characteristics will serve as landmarks to you whether you have to deal only with an isolated case of fever of any form, or with a wide-spread epidemic of thousands of cases, and I believe they will 1 See Murchison, loc. cit. p. 408. NO ANATOMICAL EXPRESSION FOR FEVER. 55 more or less be found to apply to every form of the disease, and in every latitude of the world. Let them be engraved upon your minds. It may be necessary to say to the j unior members of the class that I clai m no originality in putting them forward. I believe that they existed in the minds of most practical and experienced men from the time of Fordyce to our own, and are based on their recorded observations. Gentlemen, I speak to you, and I have always endeavored to do so, less as a teacher than as a fellow student — a senior one of course, but still, not as a master, but as a comrade. We shall find as we advance in the true method of studying medi- cine — which is mainly, the practice of it — that we shall attach less weight to the distinctions and classifications of essential diseases given in books, instilled into our minds in our student days, and clinging to us in the early years of professional life, than to the facts connected with their history, resemblances, and treatment. Believe me, we shall find this a better use. of our time. Medical literature and medical teaching give many lessons not written in the book of nature, and, when you stand face to face with disease, all such will have to be ignored or forgotten. LECTURE VIII. Division of Fevers into Essential and Symptomatic — No anatomical expression for the disease — Secondary affections of fever — These may, and do, frequently produce organic changes — The presence of essential disease invalidates the ordinary rules of diagnosis — Illustrations of the truth of this statement — Local symptoms of fever are (1) functional or nervous; (2) anatomical, i.e. depending on special anatomical changes; (3) secondary inflammatory, i.e. arising from reactive inflammation, itself due to the typhous infiltration of some part or organ of the body — Similar symp- toms may arise from essentially opposite conditions in disease— Illustrations of the proposition that fever is capable of producing local symptoms without organic change. Tiie division of fevers into essential and symptomatic is admitted by most observers. I showed you that amongst essential fevers we may reckon a great variety of diseases. All the exanthemata are essential fevers; so also are influenza, rheumatic fever, typhus, typhoid, intermit- tent and remittent fevers, the plague, the yellow fever, and I believe w