rint- 16 — 47372-2 GPO /.>\'!MH! auas;.J}ll tm'^,'^J.ix'^,t)i,). 'laj iM.;,',it,fc ! r i! iHt'-.Mt^w . V',.w mmm The Paris Commune. 23 In the south of Gaul, where the old Roman cities existed in greater num- ber, and where, farther off from the centre of Germanic invasions and dom- ination, they had kept their population and their riches, the attempts at enfranchisement were, if not more energetic, at least more completely fortu- nate. It is there only that the enfranchised cities reached the plenitude of that repubhcan existence which was in some sort the ideal to which all the Communes aspired.* To this succeeded the establishment of one kingly power, bringing in the principle of centralization, necessary perhaps towards the unity of the nation, but crushing out the republi- can Communes. The democratic spirit which arose afterwards in opposition to the centralization of royalty was only reaction- ary, the assertion of anarchical individualism, not republican. Monarchy overthrown, at the close of the eighteenth century, democracy had logically but the choice between free-trade or Communism, — the two egotisms of employer and employed, in either case only the assertion of every individual's right of pow- er, the opposite pole of the individualism of monarchy, '48 and '5 1 showed us how extremes meet ; how, " the Republic " failing through aiming at egotistical interests only, the Empire could outbid the Republic in its appeal to the mere rights of the democracy. Empire is but the greediness of one man ; and if democracy be only the assemblage of so many greeds, why should they not come to terms 1 So universal suffrage pro- claimed the Emperor. And the republican must take a new departure. If he accept not the higher theory of duty, if his Republic be not the work of all for the good of all, growing out of an active and even self-sacrificing propagandism for the sake of all humanity, on what ground shall he build 1 He confines himself to a mere politic " republicanism,". which is only self-de- fense. After the defeat of '51, who shall wonder that men, whose belief had been in schemes only for the material advan- tage of individuals (only that, however generous and self-sacri- ficing the advocate), should stand at bay instead of beginning a new pursuit .-* Who shall blame them if they could not escape the fatality of their own logic } Men who had passed through the Communism of Cabet and the like may be pardoned if, even * Thierry, Letter xiii. mm. •"UnHMMIMtf* 24 The Paris Connnune. in rejecting that, they still retained some little of the separatist spirit of earlier clays, confirmed also, it may be, by a natural feel- ing of reaction against the centralization which has been the curse of modern France, and which helped to throw her so entirely at the feet of the Decembrist. On the other hand, men feeling the insufficiency of merely political cnange caught perhaps too hastily at any clue to lead them from the labyrinth. I am not criticising the men. I am only recalling certain modes of thought, so endeavoring to find the causes and track the courses of events. In their exile, after the establishment of the Empire, Pyat and some others appear to have fallen back upon this idea of the older Commune. Recollect the vote, not once only, for the Emperor. Bear in mind the net-work of imperial centralization. What shall break through that .'' What shall stand against the mightily organized power of the Church, buttressing the Em- pire .'' Appeal to the nation, — to the voices of the ignorant peasant majority! Wait the triumph of ideas, — ideas are pro- scribed, and it is the Church that educates. Exile or the City of Refuge — there seems no other choice. Again the Empire passes, not overthrown, but falling through. There is again a chance. Even this despair shall give us ground. This war against the foreigner shall make a nation of us, and in some sort a republic, with room and time for development and the thought of further progress. And, lo ! the peasantry elects a monarchical Assembly that betrays us to the Prussians ; the army of the Church will bind us to the wheels of some new constitutional monarchy, — a new Louis Philippe, or Thiers, in place of Napoleon. As a Frenchman, I think I would have given my life unhesitatingly for the Commune. And yet — Outside of all individual or national difficulties, beyond all that may excuse or justify us as individuals or in the composite individuality of nationhood, stands the inexorable law of cause and effect, which will not spare us for any excuse, for even the most sufficient justification. The days of isolation and separat- ism are at an end, whether in Convents, Communes, or Com- munities, whether for Cities of Refuge or for Nations. The walls of China are falling, as those of Aries and Nimes and TJie Paris Commune. 25 Laon fell, not to be built up again. Our business, our hope, is no longer isolation, but association and devotion to humanity. The Christian theory of Right is a problem worked out and demonstrated. We have no new phase of it to learn. But we have to learn the new gospel of Communion, the Duty of fellow- ship'^ Not again the hermitage in which the world may be for- gotten ; not again the Commune of old time, jealously guarding' itself from the world, an armed sentinel, as inhumanly if not as tyrannously egotistical as the robber lord or more imperial bri- gand against whom it then was justified in keeping guard ; no longer the narrow national and inhuman policy of " avoiding entangling alliances." The hermit must quit his cell for active citizenship, the Commune labor_/(?r and ivith and under order of the nation, the nation own itself a citizen of the world. Each in its sphere, — citizen, Commune, or nation, — only the sworn soldier, or, if need be, martyr, of universal republicanism. This is the duty of the time: and in the misunderstanding of this lay the mistake of the Paris Commune, and the weakness which would have insured its failure, though the Red flag were float- ing now over the Hotel de Ville, not only in Paris, but in all the Communes of "republican" France. Again, I am not speaking against the men. Before the men who gave their lives so grandly I bow my head with reverence I would not owe to kings. I would rather be with Delescluse in that bloody Paris gutter than with the Kaiser in his triumphal car. Honor to the defeated Commune ! But let even the other cities of France remonstrate with Paris. Why did they not second her endeavor .-* Not altogether because of the lying cir- culars of Thiers ; not certainly for want of some sympathetic spontaneity. Lyons and Marseilles believed also in the Com- mune. Toulouse obeyed the impulse of the capital. But why should one Commune move with another .'' A federation of Communes may be a philosopher's dream ; but the policy is unsound. If your principle is isolation, separation, the federa- tion is as it pleases us, when it pleases us, or not at all. There lies the fatal error of any sectional policy. We are not going backward to secession and division, even with a federation as the end. The peoples have suffered enough to obtain even the Mi>-**MMpaW>«l^ 26 The Paris Coniviunc. framework of nationality : suffered all the evils of kingship, obliged, for the sake of one great ruler in an age, to bear the tricks of ordinary monarchs who cut and carved the countries at their caprice, joining this to that without sense of fitness, and often in their wars sundering the little cohesion that wiser men ordained or better times allowed. Still, after much suffering, we are somehow stumbling into the framework of nationality, the first condition for the real organization of society. It is some- thing to have the form. Though the spirit of nationality which shall give us life and growth can only be breathed into us by the Republic. The Commune is a failure. The men who attempted it are condemned. The great humanitarian question set by these " Communists,", the question of the abolition of misery through the organization of labor, is not to be solved that way. Is the Reaction therefore sure 1 This wager of battle has given no verdict for or against the issue. It says no more than this : Not by a single city, nor by a separate nation, shall that remodeling of society be accomplished through which the hire of the laborer shall no longer be kept back by fraud. The weakness of the Paris Commune lay in its isolation. Yet all that blood has not been poured out in vain. One gain cannot escape us. While we note mistaken policy, let us not the less take this to heart : that once again these men of Paris have given to the world the ever-needed example of heroic daring and devotedness, have laid one more broad stone (though it be their own grave-stone) of that glorious causeway over which Humanity, defeated or tri- umphant, marches firmly to the Republic. • ;-i?r J'^ss^ai^s ^Kss^ssf 'w»;'*^":'s