.- H m .■■■;■■■.;■' us 41 -■^nra nffl«iHHnBnHmn HIHiSB lilll Hi iwi HH IHHHRhu MB ■■■■__ EsyHNHRHQBS&F mm Bn^^SP HHHH mm UliH HlHi Milffliilii. mwHw ror»» IBB M iiili ■HHHlllliil Class Book CopigM . COHRIGHT deposit THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS WILLIAM T. TILDEN KfSO PLATE I WILLIAM T. TILDE M - Champion of the world, in action. THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS BY WILLIAM TrTILDEN %» CHAMPION OF THE WORLD WITH THIBTY ILLUSTRATIONS NEW Xlir YORK GEORGE H. DORAN COMPANY COPYRIGHT, 1921, BY GEORGE H. DORAN COMPANY PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA APR -I 1921 _ ©CLA611413 « To E. D. K AND M. W. J. MY "BUDDIES" W. T. T. n INTRODUCTION Tennis is at once an art and a science. The game as played by such men as Norman E. Brookes, the late Anthony Wilding, William M. Johnston, and R. N. Williams is art. Yet like all true art, it has its basis in scientific methods that must be learned and learned thoroughly for a foundation before the artistic structure of a great tennis game can be con- structed. Every player who helps to attain a high degree of efficiency should have a clearly defined method of development and adhere to it. He should be certain that it is based on sound principles and, once assured of that, follow it, even though his progress seems slow and discouraging. I began tennis wrong. My strokes were wrong and my viewpoint clouded. I had no early training such as many of our American boys have at the pres- ent time. No one told me the importance of the fundamentals of the game, such as keeping the eye on the ball or correct body position and footwork. I was given a racquet and allowed to hit the ball. Naturally, like all beginners, I acquired many very serious faults. I worried along with moderate suc- cess until I had been graduated from school, beating viii INTRODUCTION some fairly good players, but losing some matches to men below my class. The year following my graduation the new Captain of my Alma Mater's team asked me if I would aid him in developing the squad for next year. Well, 'Tools rush in where angels fear to tread," so I said Yes. At that point my tennis education began. The youngsters comprising our tennis squad all knew me well and felt at perfect liberty to ask me as many questions as they could think up. I was besieged with requests to explain why Jones missed a forehand drive down the side-line, or Smith couldn't serve well, or Brown failed to hit the ball at all. Frankly, I did not know, but I answered them something at the moment and said to myself it was time I learned some fundamentals of tennis. So I began to study the reasons why certain shots are missed and others made. Why certain balls are hit so much faster though with less effort than others, and why some players are great while most are only good. I am still studying, but my results to date have resulted in a definite system to be learned, and it is this which I hope to explain to you in my book. Tennis has a language all its own. The idioms of the game should be learned, as all books on the game are written in tennis parlance. The technical terms and their counterpart in slang need to be understood to thoroughly grasp the idea in any written tennis account. I do not believe in using a great deal of space INTRODUCTION ix carefully defining each blade of grass on a court, or each rule of the game. It gets nowhere. I do advocate teaching the terms of the game. i. The Court. The Base-lfne=The back line. The Service-line=The back line of the service court, extending from side-line to side-line at a point 21 feet from the net. The Alleys^The space on each side of the court between the side service-line and the outside side- line of a doubles court. They are used only when playing doubles and are not marked on a single court. The Net=The barrier that stretches across the court in the exact centre. It is 3 feet high at the centre and 3 feet 6 inches high at the posts which stand 3 feet outside the side- lines. 2. Strokes (Two General Classes). A. Ground strokes=All shots hit from the base- lines off the bounce of the ball. B. Volleys=Shots hit while the ball is in flight through the air, previous to its bound. The Serviee=:The method of putting the ball in play. The Drive=A ground stroke hit with a flat racquet face and carrying top spin. The Chop=An undercut ground stroke is the gen- eral definition of a chop. The slice and chop INTRODUCTION are so closely related that, except in stroke analysis, they may be called chop. Stop Volleys Blocking a ball short in its flight. Half Volley or Tray Shot==A pick up. The Smash= Hitting on the full any overhead ball. The Lob= Hitting the ball in a high parabola. 3. Twist on the Ball. Top Spin=The ball spins towards the ground and in the direction of its flight. Chop, Cut, or Drag=The ball spins upwards from the ground and against the line of flight. This is slightly deviated in the slice, but all these terms are used to designate the under-struck, back-spin- ning ball. Reverse Twist=A ball that carries a rotary spin that curves one way and bounces the opposite. Break=A spin which causes the ball to bounce at an angle to its line of flight. 4. Let=A service that touches the net in its flight yet falls in court, or any illegal or irregular point that does not count. 5. FAULT=An illegal service. 6. OuT=Any shot hit outside legal boundaries of the court. 7. GooD=Any shot that strikes in a legal manner pre- scribed by rules of the game. INTRODUCTION xi 8. Footfault^ An illegal service delivery due to in- correct position of the server's feet. 9. Servers Player delivering service. 10. Receiver or Strxker= Player returning service. W. T. T. Wimbledon, July 1920 CONTENTS FAGH Introduction vii PART I: TENNIS TECHNIQUE— STROKES AND FUNDAMENTALS OF THE GAME CHAPTER I For Novices only 19 II The Drive 33 III Service 38 IV The Volley and Overhead Smash ... 45 V Chop, Half Volley, and Court Position 54 PART II: THE GENERAL LAWS OF TOURNAMENT TENNIS VI Tennis Psychology 63 VII Match Play 77 VIII Physical Fitness 88 IX Singles and Doubles 97 PART III: MODERN TENNIS AND ITS FUTURE X The Growth of the Modern Game . 107 XI The Probable Future of the Game . 128 xiv CONTENTS PART IV: SOME SIDELIGHTS ON FAMOUS PLAYERS CHAPTER FAGB Introductory . .137 XII America 141 XIII British Isles ........ 150 XIV France and Japan .157 XV The Colonies . . . . . . . .165 XVI Famous Women Players . . . . .171 ILLUSTRATIONS PLATE I William T- Tilden, Champion of the World, in Action .... Frontispiece FACING PAGE II Forehand Grip. Front View .... 24 Forehand Grip. Back View . . . .24 III The Completed Swing of the Forehand Drive 40 IV Backhand Grip. Front View . . . .41 Backhand Grip. Back View . . . . 41 . V Completion of the Backhand Drive . . 48 VI The American Twist Service. The Start of the Swing 64 VII The American Twist Service. The End of the Swing 65 VIII The Forehand Volley 80 IX The Backhand Volley . . . . .81 X The Overhead Smash 97 XI The Backhand Half Volley . . . .112 XII The Backhand Running Volley . . .129 XIII C S. Garland and R. N. Williams, Amer- ica. W. M. Johnston, America. A. G. Gobert, France. W. A. Laurentz, France 144 xv xvi ILLUSTRATIONS FACING PLATE PAGE XIV A. R. F. Kingscote, British Isles. J. G. Parke, British Isles. Gerald Patterson, Australia. T. M. Mavrogordato, British Isles *. 145 XV Louis A. Raymond, South Africa. B. I. C. Norton, South Africa. Z. F. Shimidzu, Japan. N. Mishu, Roumania . . .160 XVI Mlle. Lenglen, France. Miss Elizabeth Ryan, America. Mrs. Franklin L. Mallory (Molla Bjurstedt), America. Mrs. Larcombe and Mrs. Lambert Chambers, British Isles . . . . .161 PART I: TENNIS TECHNIQUE— STROKES AND FUNDAMENTALS OF THE GAME THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS PART I: TENNIS TECHNIQUE— STROKES AND FUNDAMENTALS OF THE GAME CHAPTER I FOR NOVICES ONLY 1 TRUST this initial effort of mine in the world of letters will find a place among both novices and experts in the tennis world. I am striving to interest the student of the game by a somewhat pro- longed discussion of match play, which I trust will shed a new light on the game. May I turn to the novice at my opening and speak of certain matters which are second nature to the skilled player? The best tennis equipment is not too good for the beginner who seeks really to succeed. It is a saving in the end, as good quality material so far outlasts poor. Always dress in tennis clothes when engaging in tennis. White is the established colour. Soft shirt, white flannel trousers, heavy white socks, and 19 20 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS rubber-soled shoes form the accepted dress for tennis. Do not appear on the courts in dark clothes, as they are apt to be heavy and hinder your speed of movement, and also they are a violation of the unwritten ethics of the game. The question of choosing a racquet is a much more serious matter. I do not advocate forcing a certain racquet upon any player. All the standard makes are excellent. It is in weight, balance, and size of handle that the real value of a racquet frame de- pends, while good stringing is essential to obtain the best results. The average player should use a racquet that weighs between 13 y 2 to 14^ ounces inclusive. I think that the best results may be obtained by a balance that is almost even or slightly heavy on the head. Decide your handle from the individual choice. Pick the one that fits comfortably in the hand. Do not use too small a handle or too light a racquet, as it is apt to turn in the hand. I recommend a handle of 5% to sH inches at the grip. Do not use a racquet you do not like merely because your best friend advises it. It may suit him perfectly, but would not do for you at all. Do not start children playing tennis with an under-sized racquet. It weakens the wrist and does not aid the child in learning strokes. Start a child, boy or girl, with a full-sized racquet of at least 13 ounces. After you have acquired your racquet, make a firm resolve to use good tennis balls, as a regular FOR NOVICES ONLY 21 bounce is a great aid to advancement, while a "dead" ball is no practice at all. If you really desire to succeed at the game and advance rapidly, I strongly urge you to see all the good tennis you can. Study the play of the leading players and strive to copy their strokes. Read all the tennis instruction books you can find. They are a great assistance. I shall be accused of "press- agitating" my own book by this statement, but such was my belief long before I ever thought of writing a book of my own. More tennis can be learned off the court, in the study of theory, and in watching the best players in action, than can ever be learned in actual play. I do not mean miss opportunities to play. Far from it. Play whenever possible, but strive when playing to put in practice the theories you have read or the strokes you have watched. Never be discouraged at slow progress. The trick over some stroke you have worked over for weeks unsuccessfully will suddenly come to you when least expected. Tennis players are the pro- duct of hard work. Very few are born geniuses at the game. Tennis is a game that pays you dividends all your life. A tennis racquet is a letter of introduction in any town. The brotherhood of the game is uni- versal, for none but a good sportsman can succeed in the game for any lengthy period. Tennis pro- vides relaxation, excitement, exercise, and pure enjoyment to the man who is tied hard and fast 22 THE ART OF LifWN TENNIS to his business until late afternoon. Age is not a drawback. Vincent Richards held the National Doubles Championship of America at fifteen, while William A. Larned won the singles at past forty. Men of sixty are seen daily on the clubs' courts of England and America enjoying their game as keenly as any boy. It is to this game, in great measure, that they owe the physical fitness which enables them to play at their advanced age. The tennis players of the world wrote a magni- ficent page in the history of the World War. No branch of sport sent more men to the colours from every country in the world than tennis, and these men returned with glory or paid the supreme sacri- fice on the field of honour. I transgressed from my opening to show you that tennis is a game worth playing and playing well. It deserves your best, and only by learning it correctly can you give that best. If in my book I help you on your way to fame, I feel amply repaid for all the time spent in ana- lysing the strokes and tactics I set before you in these pages. I am going to commence my explanation by talk- ing to the players whose games are not yet formed. At least once every season I go back to first prin- ciples to pull myself out of some rut into which carelessness dropped me. From a long and, many times, sad experience over a period of some ten years of tournament FOR NOVICES ONLY 23 tennis, I believe the following order of develop- ment produces the quickest and most lasting results: i. Concentration on the game. 2. Keep the eye on the ball. 3. Foot-work and weight-control. 4. Strokes. 5. Court position. 6. Court generalship or match play. 7. Tennis psychology. Tennis is a game of intimate personal relation. You constantly find yourself meeting some definite idea of your opponent. The personal equation is the basis of tennis success. A great player not only knows himself, in both strength and weakness, but he must study his opponent at all times. In order to be able to do this a player must not be hampered by a glaring weakness in the fundamentals of his own game, or he will be so occupied trying to hide it that he will have no time to worry his opponent. The fundamental weakness of Gerald Patterson's backhand stroke is so apparent that any player within his class dwarfs Patterson's style by continually pounding at it. The Patterson overhead and service are first class, yet both are rendered im- potent, once a man has solved the method of return- ing low to the backhand, for Patterson seldom suc- ceeds in taking the offensive again in that point. I am trying to make clear the importance of such first principles as I will now explain. 24 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS CONCENTRATION Tennis is played primarily with the mind. The most perfect racquet technique in the world will not suffice if the directing mind is wandering. There are many causes of a wandering mind in a tennis match. The chief one is lack of interest in the game. No one should play tennis with an idea of real success unless he cares sufficiently about the game to be willing to do the drudgery necessary in learning the game correctly. Give it up at once unless you are willing to work. Conditions of play or the noises in the gallery often confuse and be- wilder experienced match-players playing under new surroundings. Complete concentration on the matter in hand is the only cure for a wandering mind, and the sooner the lesson is learned the more rapid the improvement of the player. An amusing example, to all but the player affected, occurred at the finals of the Deleware State Singles Cham- pionship at Wilmington. I was playing Joseph J. Armstrong. The Championship Court borders the No. i hole of the famous golf course. The score stood at one set all and 3-4 and 30-40, Armstrong serving. He served a fault and started a second de- livery. Just as he commenced his swing, a loud and very lusty "Fore !" rang out from the links. Arm- strong unconsciously looked away and served his delivery to the backstop and the game to me. The umpire refused to "let" call and the incident closed. FOREHAND GRIP. FRONT VIEW Notice the straight line of the arm, hand and racquet, the flat racquet face, the natural finger position on the handle. The racquet is in posi- tion to hit a forehand drive. FOREHAND GRIP. BACK VD3W The line is straight, the head of the racquet slightly in advance of the hand. This pose is at the moment of contact between ball and racquet. PLATE II FOR NOVICES ONLY 25 Yet a wandering mind in that case meant the loss of a set. The surest way to hold a match in mind is to play for every set, every game in the set, every point in the game and, finally, every shot in the point. A set is merely a conglomeration of made and missed shots, and the man who does not miss is the ultimate victor. Please do not think I am advocating "pat-ball." I am not. I believe in playing for your shot every time you have an opening. I do not believe in trying to win the point every time you hit the ball. Never allow your concentration on any game to become so great that you do not at all times know the score and play to it. I mean both point score and game score. In my explanation of match play in a later chapter I am going into a detailed account of playing to the score. It is as vital in tennis as it is in bridge, and all bridge players know that the score is the determining factor in your mode of bidding. Let me urge again concentration. Prac- tise seriously. Do not fool on the court, as it is the worst enemy to progress. Carelessness or lazi- ness only results in retrogression, never progress. Let me turn now to the first principle of all ball games, whether tennis, golf, cricket, baseball, polo, or football. Keep your eye on the ball ! Just a few statistics to show you how vital it is that the eye must be kept on the ball until the moment of striking it. 26 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS About 85 per cent of the points in tennis are errors, and the remainder earned points. As the standard of play rises the percentage of errors drops until, in the average high-class tournament match, 60 per cent are errors and 40 per cent aces. Any average superior to this is super-tennis. Thus the importance of getting the ball in play cannot be too greatly emphasized. Every time you put the ball back to your opponent you give him another chance to miss. There are several causes for missing strokes. First, and by far the largest class, is not looking at the ball up to the moment of striking it. Fully 80 per cent of all errors are caused by taking the eye from the ball in the last one-fifth of a second of its flight. The remaining 20 per cent of errors are about 15 per cent bad footwork, and the other 5 per cent poor racquet work and bad bounces. The eye is a small camera. All of us enjoy dabbling in amateur photography, and every amateur must take "action" pictures with his first camera. It is a natural desire to attain to the hardest before understanding how to reach it. The result is one of two things: either a blurred moving object and a clear background, or a clear moving object and a blurred background. Both suggest speed, but only one Is a good picture of the object one attempted to photograph. In the first case the camera eye was focused on the background and not on the object, while in the second, which produced the result de- sired, the camera eye was firmly focused en the FOR NOVICES ONLY 27 moving object itself. Just so with the human eye. It will give both effects, but never a clear background and moving object at the same time, once that object reaches a point 10 feet from the eye. The perspective is wrong, and the eye cannot adjust it- self to the distance range speedily enough. Now the tennis ball is your moving object while the court, gallery, net, and your opponent constitute your background. You desire to hit the ball cleanly, therefore do not look at the other factors concerned, but concentrate solely on focusing the eye firmly on the ball, and watching it until the moment of impact with your racquet face. "How do I know where my opponent is, or how much court I have to hit in?" ask countless be- ginners. Remember this : that a tennis court is always the same size, with the net the same height and in the same relation to you at all times, so there is no need to look at it every moment or so to see if it has moved. Only an earthquake can change its position. As to your opponent, it makes little dif- ference about his position, because it is determined by the shot you are striving to return. Where he will be I will strive to explain in my chapter on court position ; but his whereabouts are known with- out looking at him. You are not trying to hit him. You strive to miss him. Therefore, since you must watch what you strive to hit and not follow what you only wish to miss, keep your eye on the ball, and let your opponent take care of himself. 28 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS Science has proved that given a tennis ball passing from point A to point B with the receiving player at B, that if the player at B keeps his eye on the ball throughout its full flight his chance of making a good A i 2 3 4 B return at B is five times as great as if he took his eye off the ball at a point 4, or | of a second of its flight. Likewise it is ten times as great at B as it is if the eye is removed from the ball at 3, or f of a second of its flight. Why increase your chances of error by five times or ten times when it is un- necessary? The average player follows the ball to 4, and then he takes a last look at his opponent to see where he is, and by so doing increases his chance of error five times. He judges the flight of the ball some 10 feet away, and never really sees it again until he has hit it (if he does). A slight deflection caused by the wind or a small misjudgment of curve will certainly mean error. Remembering the 85 'per cent errors in tennis, I again ask you if it is worth while to take the risk? There are many other reasons why keeping the eye on the ball is a great aid to the player. It tends to hold his attention so that outside occurrences will not distract. Movements in the gallery are not seen, and stray dogs, that seem to particularly enjoy sleeping in the middle of a tennis court during a hard match, are not seen on their way to their sleeping quarters. Having learned the knack of watching FOR NOVICES ONLY 29 the ball at all times, I felt that nothing would worry me, until three years ago at the American Cham- pionships, when I was playing T. R. Pell. A press- camera man eluded the watchful eye of the officials, and unobtrusively seated himself close to our side- line to acquire some action pictures. Pell angled sharply by to my backhand, and I ran at my hardest for the shot, eyes fixed solely on the ball. I hauled off to hit it a mighty drive, which would have prob- ably gone over the backstop, when suddenly I heard a camera click just under me, and the next moment camera, pressman, and tennis player were rolling in a heap all over the court. The pressman got his action picture and a sore foot where I walked on him, and all I got was a sore arm and a ruffled temper. That's why I don't like cameras right under my nose when I play matches, but for all that I still advocate keeping your eye on the ball. GRIP, FOOTWORK, AND STROKES Footwork is weight control. It is correct body position for strokes, and out of it all strokes should grow. In explaining the various forms of stroke and footwork I am writing as a right-hand player. Left- handers should simply reverse the feet. Racquet grip is a very essential part of stroke, because a faulty grip will ruin the finest serving. There is the so-called Western or Californian grip as typified by Maurice E. M'Loughlin, Willis E. Davis, and, to a slightly modified degree, W. M. 30 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS Johnston, the American champion. It is a natural grip for a top forehand drive. It is inherently weak for the backhand, as the only natural shot is a chop stroke. The English grip, with the low wrist on all ground strokes, has proved very successful in the past. Yet the broken line of the arm and hand does not com- mend itself to me, as any broken line is weak under stress. The Eastern American grip, which I advocate, is the English grip without the low wrist and broken line. To acquire the forehand grip, hold the racquet with the edge of the frame towards the ground and the face perpendicular, the handle towards the body, and "shake hands' 1 with it, just as if you were greeting a friend. The handle settled comfortably and naturally into the hand, the line of the arm, hand, and racquet are one. The swing brings the racquet head on a line with the arm, and the whole racquet is merely an extension of it. The backhand grip is a quarter circle turn of hand on the handle, bringing the hand on top of the handle and the knuckles directly up. The shot travels across the wrist. This is the best basis for a grip. I do not advo- cate Jearning this grip exactly, but model your natu- ral grip as closely as possible on these lines without sacrificing your own comfort or individuality. Having once settled the racquet in the hand, the next question is the position of the body and the order of developing strokes. FOR NOVICES ONLY 31 In explaining footwork I am, in future, going to refer in all forehand shots to the right foot as R or "back" foot, and to the left as L or "front." For the backhand the L foot is "back" and R is "front." All tennis strokes should be made with the body at right angles to the net, with the shoulders lined up parallel to the line of flight of the ball. The weight should always travel forward. It should pass from the back foot to the front foot at the moment of striking the ball. Never allow the weight to be going away from the stroke. It is weight that de- termines the "pace" of a stroke; swing that de- cides the "speed." Let me explain the definitions of "speed" and "pace." "Speed" is the actual rate with which a ball travels through the air. "Pace" is the velocity with which it comes off the ground. Pace is weight. It is the "sting" the ball carries when it comes off the ground, giving the inexperienced or unsuspect- ing player a shock of force which the stroke in no way showed. Notable examples of "pace" are such men as W. A. Larned, A. W. Gore, J. C. Parke, and among the younger players, R. N. Williams, Major A. R. F. Kingscote, W. M. Johnston, and, on his forehand stroke, Charles S. Garland. M. E. M'Loughlin, Willis E. Davis, Harold Throckmorton and several others are famous "speed" exponents. A great many players have both "speed" and "pace." Some shots may carry both. m THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS The order of learning strokes should be : i . The Drive. Fore- and backhand. This is the foundation of all tennis, for you cannot build up a net attack unless you have the ground stroke to open the way. Nor can you meet a net attack success- fully unless you can drive, as that is the only success- ful passing shot. 2. The Service. 3. The Volley and Overhead Smash. 4. The Chop or Half Volley and other incidental and ornamental strokes. CHAPTER II THE DRIVE THE forehand drive is the opening of every offensive in tennis, and, as such, should be most carefully studied. There are certain rules of footwork that apply to all shots. To reach a ball that is a short distance away, advance the foot that is away from the shot and thus swing into position to hit. If a ball is too close to the body, retreat the foot closest to the shot and drop the weight back on it, thus, again, being in position for the stroke. When hurried, and it is not possible to change the foot position, throw the weight on the foot closest to the ball. The receiver should always await the service fac- ing the net, but once the serve is started on the way to court, the receiver should at once attain the position to receive it with the body at right angles to the net. The forehand drive is made up of one continuous swing of the racquet that, for the purpose of analy- sis, may be divided into three parts: i. The portion of the swing behind the body, which determines the speed of the stroke. 2. That portion immediately in front of the body 33 34 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS which determines the direction and, in conjunction with weight shift from one foot to the other, the pace of the shot. 3. The portion beyond the body, comparable to the golfer's "follow through," determines spin, top or slice, imparted to the ball. All drives should be topped. The slice shot is a totally different stroke. To drive straight down the side-line, construct in theory a parallelogram with two sides made up of the side-line and your shoulders, and the two ends, the lines of your feet, which should, if ex- tended, form the right angles with the side-lines. Meet the ball at a point about 4 to 4^ feet from the body immediately in front of the belt buckle, and shift the weight from the back to the front foot at the moment of striking the ball. The swing of the racquet should be flat and straight through. The racquet head should be on a line with the hand, or, if anything, slightly in advance; the whole arm and the racquet should turn slightly over the ball as it leaves the racquet face and the stroke continue to the limit of the swing, thus imparting top spin to the ball. The hitting plane for all ground strokes should be between the knees and shoulders. The most favourable plane is on a line with the waist. In driving across the court from the right (or No. 1) court, advance the L or front foot slightly towards the side-line and shift the weight a fraction THE DRIVE 35 of a second sooner. As the weight shifts, pivot slightly on the L foot and drive flat, diagonally, across the court. Do not "pull" your cross-court drive, unless with the express purpose of passing the net way and using that method to disguise your shot. Never step away from the ball in driving cross court. Always throw your weight in the shot. The forehand drive from the No. 2 (or left) court is identically the same for the straight shot down your opponent's forehand. For the cross drive to his backhand, you must conceive of a diag- onal line from your backhand corner to his, and thus make your stroke with the footwork as if this imagi- nary line were the side-line. In other words, line up your body along your shot and make your regular drive. Do not try to "spoon" the ball over with a delayed wrist motion, as it tends to slide the ball off your racquet. All drives should be made with a stiff, locked wrist. There is no wrist movement in a true drive. Top spin is imparted by the arm, not the wrist. The backhand drive follows closely the principles of the forehand, except that the weight shifts a moment sooner, and the R or front foot should always be advanced a trifle closer to the side-line than the L so as to bring the body clear of the swing. The ball should be met in front of the right leg, in- stead of the belt buckle, as the great tendency in backhand shots is to slice them out of the side-line, and this will pull the ball cross court, obviating this 36 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS error. The racquet hand must be slightly in advance of the hand to aid in bringing the ball in the court. Do not strive for too much top spin on your back- hand. I strongly urge that no one should ever favour one department of his game, in defence of a weak- ness. Develop both forehand and backhand, and do not "run around" your backhand, particularly in return of service. To do so merely opens your court. If you should do so, strive to ace your re- turns, because a weak effort would only result in a kill by your opponent. Do not develop one favourite shot and play noth- ing but that. If you have a fair cross-court drive, do not use it in practice, but strive to develop an equally fine straight shot. Remember that the fast shot is the straight shot. The cross drive must be slow, for it has not the room owing to the increased angle and height of the net. Pass down the line with your drive, but open the court with your cross-court shot. Drives should have depth. The average drive should hit behind the service-line. A fine drive should hit within 3 feet of the base-line. A cross-court drive should be shorter than a straight drive, so as to increase the possible angle. Do not always play one length drive, but learn to vary your distance according to your man. You should drive deep against a base-liner, but short against a net player, striving to drop them at his feet as he comes in. «■ THE DRIVE 37 Never allow your opponent to play a shot he likes if you can possibly force him to one he dislikes. Again I urge that you play your drive: i. With the body sideways to the net. 2. The swing flat, with long follow through. 3. The weight shifting just as the ball is hit. Do not strive for terrific speed at first. The most essential thing about a drive is to put the ball in play. I once heard William A. Lamed remark, when asked the most important thing in tennis, "Put the ball over the net into the other man's court." Accuracy first, and then put on your speed, for if your shot is correct you can always learn to hit hard. CHAPTER III SERVICE SERVICE is the opening gun of tennis. It is putting the ball in play. The old idea was that service should never be more than merely the beginning of a rally. With the rise of American tennis and the advent of Dwight Davis and Hol- combe Ward, service took on a new significance. These two men originated what is now known as the American Twist delivery. From a mere formality, service became a point winner. Slowly it gained in importance, until Maurice E. M'Loughlin, the wonderful "California Comet,' , burst across the tennis sky with the first of those terrific cannon-ball deliveries that revolu- tionized the game, and caused the old-school players to send out hurry calls for a very footfault rule or some way of stopping the threatened destruction of all ground strokes. M'Loughlin made service a great factor in the game. It remained for R. N. Williams to supply the antidote that has again put service in the normal position of mere importance, not omnipotence. Williams stood in on the delivery and took it on the rising bound. ' 38 SERVICE 39 Service must be speedy. Yet speed is not the be-all and end-all. Service must be accurate, reli- able, and varied. It must be used with discretion and served with brains. I believe perfect service is about 40 per cent placement, 40 per cent speed, and 20 per cent twist. Any tall player has an advantage over a short one, in service. Given a man about 6 feet and allow him the 3 feet added by his reach, it has been proved by tests that should he deliver a service, perfectly fiat, with no variation caused by twist or wind, that just cleared the net at its lowest point (3 feet in the centre), there is only a margin of 8 inches of the service court in which the ball can possibly fall; the remainder is below the net angle. Thus it is easy to see how important it is to use some form of twist to bring the ball into court. Not only must it go into court, but it must be sufficiently speedy that the receiver does not have an opportunity of an easy kill. It must also be placed so as to allow the server an advantage for his next return, admitting the receiver puts the ball in play. Just as the first law of receiving is to put the ball in play, so of service it is to cause the receiver to fall into error. Do not strive unduly for clean aces, but use your service to upset the ground strokes of your opponent. There are several style services in vogue in all countries. The American twist has become one of the most popular forms of delivery and as such 40 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS deserves special treatment. The usual forms of service are (i) the slice service, (2) the American twist, (3) the reverse delivery, (4) the "cannon ball" or flat serve. The slice service is the easiest and most natural form for all beginners, and proves so effective that many great players use it. It is the service of William M. Johnston, A. R. F. Kingscote, Norman E. Brookes, and many others. Service should be hit from as high a point as the server can comfortably reach. To stretch un- necessarily is both wearing on the server and un- productive of results. The slice service should be hit from a point above the right shoulder and as high as possible. The server should stand at about a forty-five degree angle to the base-line, with both feet firmly planted on the ground. Drop the weight back on the right foot and swing the racquet freely and easily behind the back. Toss the ball high enough into the air to ensure it passing through the desired hitting plane, and then start a slow shift of the weight forward, at the same time increasing the power of the swing forward as the racquet commences its upward flight to the ball. Just as the ball meets the racquet face the weight should be thrown forward and the full power of the swing smashed into the service. Let the ball strike the racquet insid? the face of the strings, with the racquet travelling directly towards the court. The. angle of the racquet face will impart the twist necessary PLATE III THE COMPLETED SWING OF THE FOREHAND DRIVE Notice the body position, at right angles to the net, the weight on the front or left foot, having passed from the right foot with the swing, just at the moment the ball is struck. The racquet is carried to the- limit of the swing and falls into the left hand at the height of the shoulder. The racquet face has passed over the ball. The reader is looking through the strings. The stroke was made with the far side of the racquet from the camera. The eye is following the ball in its flight. The whole movement is forward. BACKHAND GRIP. FRONT VIEW Note the hand on top of the racquet handle, yet retaining the straight line of arm, hand and racquet as in the forehand. The change from the forehand grip is one quarter circle of the handle. The knuckles are up and directly towards the opponent. The head of the racquet is advanced slightly towards the ball. BACKHAND GRIP. BACK VIEW Notice the line of arm and racquet is straight and the hand on top of the handle. The thumb in my stroke is around the handle, but may be placed up the handle if desired. Personally, I do not use it, and do not advocate it, as it tends to detract from the freedom of the grip. PLATE IV SERVICE 41 to bring the ball in court. The wrist should be somewhat flexible in service. If necessary lift the right foot and swing the whole body forward with the arm. Twist slightly to the right, using the left foot as a pivot. The general line of the racquet swing is from right to left and always forward. At this point and before I take up the other branches of serving, let me put in a warning against f ootf aulting. I can only say that a footfault is crossing or touching the line with either foot before the ball is delivered, or it is a jump or step. I am not going into a technical discussion of footfaults. It is unnecessary, and by placing your feet firmly before the service there is no need to footfault. It is just as unfair to deliberately footfault as to miscall a ball, and it is wholly unnecessary. The average footfault is due to carelessness, over- anxiety, or ignorance of the rule. All players are offenders at times, but it can quickly be broken up. Following this outburst of warning let me return to the American twist service. The stance for this is the same as for the slice, but the ball is thrown slightly to the left of the head while the racquet passes up and over the call, travelling from left to right and slightly forward. The result is a curve to the left and the break of the bound to the right. This service is not fast, but gives an ex- cellent chance to follow to the net, since it travels high and slowly and its bound is deep. The American twist service should be hit with the muscles of the side. The slice is a shoulder swing. 48 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS The reverse twist is of an absolutely distinct type. The stance is facing the net with both toes fronting the line. The racquet is gripped as a club. The ball is thrown in front of the body and not high. The swing is a sharp wrist twist from right to left, the ball carried for some distance on the face of the racquet. The curve is from left to right while the bound is high and breaks sharply to the left. This delivery is slow, ineffective and very uncertain. There is little opportunity to follow it to the net. The "cannon-ball" service is nothing but a slice as regards swing and stance, but it is hit with a fiat racquet face, thus imparting no spin to the ball. It is a case of speed alone. This service is a point winner when it goes in; but its average must neces- sarily be poor since its margin of error is so small. It is only useful to a tall man. Varied pace and varied speed is the keynote to a good service. I spent hours in serving alone, striving to disguise the twist and pace of the ball. I would take a box of a dozen balls out on the court and serve the whole dozen to No. i court with one style of delivery. Then, crossing, I would serve them back with another type of service. Next, I would try the left court from both sides. My next move would be to pick out a certain section of the service court, and serve for that until I could put the ball where I wanted it. Finally, I would strive to put it there with speed. All the time spent in this practice has stood me In SERVICE 43 good stead, for to-day it is my service that pulls me out of many a deep hole, and causes many a player to wish he was delivering the ball. William M. Johnston, the American Champion, has a remark- able service for so short a man. He times his stroke perfectly, and hits it at the top of his reach, so that he gets the full benefit of every inch of his stature and every pound of his weight. He uses the slice delivery in the majority of matches. Do not try freak services. They are useless against high-class players. Sharp breaking under- hand cuts can be easily angled off for points by a man who knows anything of the angles and effects of twist. These deliveries are affectation if used more than once or twice in a long match. A sudden shift may surprise your opponent; but to continue to serve these freaks is to destroy their use. Mishu, the Rumanian star, has many very peculiar deliveries; but, when playing against high- class tennis, he has brains enough to use a straight service. The freak services delight and yet annoy a gallery, for once the novelty has worn off, nothing but the conceit remains. The object of service is to obtain the maximum return with the minimum effort. This statement holds true for all tennis strokes, but in none so strongly as in service. The average player hits his first service so hard, and with so little regard for direction, that about nine out of ten first deliveries are faults. Thus, one 44 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS half your chances are thrown away, and the chance of double faulting increased proportionately. There is a well-known tennis saying to the effect that one fault is a mistake, but two faults are a crime — that sums up the idea of service adequately. A player should always strive to put his first de- livery in court. In the first place it is apt to catch your opponent napping, as he half expects a fault. Secondly, it conserves your energy by removing the need of a second delivery, which, in a long five-set match, is an item of such importance that it may mean victory or defeat. I urge all players to put their service into court with just as much speed as they can be sure of, but to serve both deliveries at about the same speed. Do not slog the first ball and pat the second, but hit both with average pace. Try for service aces whenever reasonable, but never do so at the risk of double faulting. The first ball is the ball to ace. The second should never be risked. Your aces must at least equal your double faults, or your service is a handicap and not an advantage. The importance of service in doubles is more pronounced than in singles as regards holding it; but the need for individual brilliancy is not so great, as you have a partner already at the net to kill off any weak returns. Service is an attack, and a successful attack should never break down. CHAPTER IV THE VOLLEY AND OVERHEAD SMASH THE net attack is the heavy artillery of tennis. It is supposed to crush all defence. As such it must be regarded as a point-winning stroke at all times, no matter whether the shot is volley or smash. Once at the net hit from the point at the first opportunity given to get the racquet squarely on the ball. All the laws of footwork explained for the drive are theoretically the same in volleying. In practice you seldom have time to change your feet to a set position, so you obviate trouble by throwing the weight on the foot nearest to the ball and pushing it in the shot. Volleys are of two classes : ( i ) the low volley, made from below the waist; and (2) the high vol- ley, from the waist to the head. In contradistinc- tion to the hitting plane classification are the two styles known as (1) the deep volley and (2) the stop volley. All low volleys are blocked. High volleys may be either blocked or hit. Volleys should never be stroked.- There is no follow through on a low volley and very little on a high one. 45 46 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS You will hear much talk of "chop" volleys. A chop stroke is one where the racquet travels from above the line of flight of the ball, down and through it, and the angle made behind the racquet is greater than 45 per cent, and many approach 90 per cent. Therefore I say that no volleys should be chopped, for the tendency is to pop the ball up in the air off any chop. Slice volleys if you want to, or hit them flat, for both these shots are made at a very small angle to the flight-line of the ball, the racquet face travelling almost along its plane. In all volleys, high or low, the wrist should be locked and absolutely stiff. It should always be below the racquet head, thus bracing the racquet against the impact of the ball. Allow the force of the incoming shot, plus your own weight, to return the ball, and do not strive to "wrist" it over. The tilted racquet face will give any required angle to the return by glancing the ball off the strings, so no wrist turn is needed. Low volleys can never be hit hard, and owing to the height of the net should usually be sharply angled, to allow distance for the rise. Any ball met at a higher plane than the top of the net may be hit hard. The stroke should be crisp, snappy, and decisive, but it should stop as it meets the ball. The follow through should be very small. Most low volleys should be soft and short. Most high volleys require speed and length. The "stop" volley is nothing more than a shot blocked short. There is no force used. The rac- THE VOLLEY AND OVERHEAD SMASH 47 quet simply meets the oncoming ball and stops it. The ball rebounds and falls of its own weight. There is little bounce to such a shot, and that may- be reduced by allowing the racquet to slide slightly under the ball at the moment of impact, thus im- parting back spin to the ball. Volleying is a science based on the old geometric axiom that a straight line is the shortest distance between two points. I mean that a volleyer must always cover the straight passing shot since it is the shortest shot with which to pass him, and he must volley straight to his opening and not waste time trying freakish curving volleys that give the base- liner time to recover. It is Johnston's great straight volley that makes him such a dangerous net man. He is always "punching" his volley straight and hard to the opening in his opponent's court. A net player must have ground strokes in order to attain the net position. Do not think that a service and volley will suffice against first-class tennis. I am not a believer in the "centre" theory. Briefly expressed the centre theory is to hit down the middle of the court and follow to the net, since the other player has the smallest angle to pass you. That is true, but remember that he has an equal angle on either side and, given good ground strokes, an equal chance to pass with only your guess or intention to tell you which side he will choose. I advise hitting to the side-line with good length and following up to the net, coming in just to the 48 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS centre side of the straight returns down the line. Thus the natural shot is covered and your oppon- ent's court is opened for an angle volley 'cross. Should your opponent try the cross drive, his chances of beating you clean and keeping the ball in court are much less than his chances of error. Strive to kill your volleys at once, but should your shot not win, follow the ball 'cross and again cover the straight shot. Always force the man striving to pass you to play the hardest possible shot. Attack with your volleys. Never defend the ball when at the net. The only defensive volley is one at your feet as you come in. It is a mid-court shot. Volleys should win with placement more than speed, although speed may be used on a high volley. Closely related to the volley, yet in no way a volley stroke, is the overhead smash. It is the Big Bertha of tennis. It is the long range terror that should always score. The rules of footwork, position, and direction that govern the volley will suffice for the overhead. The swing alone is dif- ferent. The swing should be closely allied to the slice service, the racquet and arm swinging freely from the shoulder, the wrist flexible and the racquet imparting a slight twist to the ball to hold it in court. The overhead is mainly a point winner through speed, since its bounce is so high that a slow placement often allows time for a recovery. The overhead is about 60 per cent speed, and 40 per cent combined place and twist. Any over- PLATE V COMPLETION OF THE BACKHAND DRIVE Notice the feet are firmly set, with the weight on the right foot, to which it was shifted from the left with the swing. The racquet has struck and passed over the ball, topping it. The body is at right angles to the net, the left arm extended to aid in perfect balance. The whole movement is forward, while the eye is on the ball in its flight. The stroke in the picture was off a high bounding ball, which accounts for the racquet's position being above the wrist in order to bring down the ball. The perfect backhand drive is off the wrist, and the racquet passes along that hitting plane. THE VOLLEY AND OVERHEAD SMASH 49 head shot taken on or within the service-line should be killed. Any overhead behind the service-line, and back to the base-line, should be defended and put back deep to allow you another advance to the net. The average overhead shot that is missed is netted. Therefore hit deep. It is a peculiar fact that over 75 per cent of all errors are nets with only 25 per cent outs. Let this be a constant re- minder to you of the fact that all ground strokes should have a clear margin of safety of some 8 inches to a foot above the net, except when attempt- ing to pass a very active volleyer. In the latter case the shot must be low, and the attendant risk is com- pensated by the increased chances of winning the point with a pass. Do not leap in the air unnecessarily to hit over- head balls. Keep at least one foot, and when pos- sible both feet, on the ground in smashing, as it aids in regulating the weight, and gives better balance. Hit flat and decisively to the point if desired. Most missed overhead shots are due to the eye leaving the ball ; but a second class of errors are due to lack of confidence that gives a cramped, half- hearted swing. Follow through your overhead shot to the limit of your swing. The overhead is essentially a doubles shot, be- cause in singles the chances of passing the net man are greater than lobbing over his head, while in 50 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS doubles two men cover the net so easily that the best way to open the court is to lob one man back. In smashing, the longest distance is the safest shot since it allows a greater margin of error. Therefore smash 'cross court when pressed, but pull your short lobs either side as determined by the man you are playing. Never drop a lob you can hit overhead, as it forces you back and gives the attacking position to your opponent. Never smash with a reverse twist, always hit with a straight racquet face and direct to the opening. Closely connected to the overhead since it is the usual defence to any hard smash, is the lob. A lob is a high toss of the ball landing between the service-line and the base-line. An excellent lob should be within 6 feet of the base-line. Lobs are essentially defensive. The ideas in lobbing are: (i) to give yourself time to recover position when pulled out of court by your opponent's shot; (2) to drive back the net man and break up his attack; (3) to tire your opponent; (4) occasionally to win cleanly by placement. This is usually a lob volley from a close net rally, and is a slightly different stroke. There is ( 1 ) the chop lob, a heavily under-cut spin that hangs in the air. This is the best defensive lob, as it goes high and gives plenty of time to recover position. (2) The stroke lob or flat lob, hit with a slight top spin. This is the point-winning lob since it gives no time to the player to run around THE VOLLEY AND OVERHEAD SMASH 51 it, as it is lower and faster than the chop. In mak- ing this lob, start your swing like a drive, but allow the racquet to slow up and the face to tilt upward just as you meet the ball. This shot should seldom go above 10 feet in the air, since it tends to go out with the float of the ball. The chop lob, which is a decided under cut, should rise from 20 to 30 feet, or more, high and must go deep. It is better to lob out and run your opponent back, thus tiring him, than to lob short and give him confidence by an easy kill. The value of a lob is mainly one of upsetting your opponent, and its effects are very apparent if you unexpectedly bring off one at the crucial period of a match. I owe one of my most notable victories to a very timely and somewhat lucky lob. I was playing Norman E. Brookes in the fifth round of the American Championships at Forest Hills, in 19 19. The score stood one set all, 3-2 and 30-15, Brookes serving. In a series of driving returns from his forehand to my backhand, he suddenly switched and pounded the ball to my forehand corner and rushed to the net. I knew Brookes crowded the net, and with 40-15 or 30-all at stake on my shot, I took a chance and tossed the ball up in the air over Brookes' head. It was not a great lob, but it was a good one. For once Brookes was caught napping, expecting a drive down the line. He hesitated, then turned and chased the ball to the back stop, missing it on his return. I heard him grunt as he turned, and knew that he was badly winded. He 52 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS missed his volley off my return of the next service, and I led at 30-40. The final point of the game came when he again threw me far out of court on my forehand, and, expecting the end drive again, crowded the net, only to have the ball rise in the air over his head. He made a desperate effort at recovery, but failed, and the game was mine: 3-all. It proved the turning-point in the match, for it not only tired Brookes, but it forced him to hang back a little from the net so as to protect his overhead, so that his net attack weakened opportunely, and I was able to nose out the match in 4 sets. Another famous match won by a lob was the Johnston-Kingscote Davis Cup Match at Wimble- don, in 1920. The score stood 2 sets all, and 6-5, Johnston leading, with Kingscote having the game point at 30-40. Johnston served and ran in. Kingscote drove sharply down Johnston's fore- hand side-line. Johnston made a remarkable re- covery with a half volley, putting the ball high in the air and seemingly outside. A strong wind was blowing down the court and caught the ball and held its flight. It fell on the base-line. Kings- cote made a remarkable recovery with a fine lob that forced Johnston back. Kingscote took the net and volleyed decisively to Johnston's backhand. Johnston again lobbed, and by a freak of coincidence the ball fell on the base-line within a foot of his previous shot. Kingscote again lobbed in return, but this time short, and Johnston killed it. Johnston ran out the match in the next two points. THE VOLLEY AND OVERHEAD SMASH 53 If a shot can win two such matches as these, it is a shot worth learning to use, and knowing when to use. The lob is one of the most useful and skilful shots in tennis. It is a great defence and a fine attack. The strokes already analysed, drive, service, volley, overhead and lob, are the orthodox strokes of tennis, and should be at every player's command. These are the framework of your game. Yet no house is complete with framework alone. There are certain trimmings, ornaments, and decorations necessary. There are the luxuries of modern im- provements, and tennis boasts of such improvements in the modern game. Among the luxuries, some say the eccentricities, of the modern game one finds ( i ) the chop stroke, (2) the slice stroke (a close relative), (3) the drop shot, (4) the half-volley or "trap" shot. All these shots have their use. None should be considered a stock shot. CHAPTER V CHOP, HALF VOLLEY, AND COURT POSITION 1AM called at times a chop-stroke player. I seldom chop. My stroke is a slice. A chop stroke is a shot where the angle towards the player and behind the racquet, made by the line of flight of the ball, and the racquet travelling down across it, is greater than 45 per cent and may be 90 per cent. The racquet face passes slightly outside the ball and down the side, chopping it, as a man chops wood. The spin and curve is from right to left. It is made with a stiff wrist. Irving C. Wright, brother of the famous Beals, is a true chop player, while Beals himself, being a left-hander, chopped from the left court and sliced from the right. The slice shot merely reduced the angle men- tioned from 45 per cent down to a very small one. The racquet face passes either inside or outside the ball, according to direction desired, while the stroke is mainly a wrist twist or slap. This slap imparts a decided skidding break to the ball, while a chop "drags" the ball off the ground without break. Wallace F. Johnson is the greatest slice exponent in the world. 54 HALF VOLLEY AND COURT POSITION 55 The rules of footwork for both these shots should be the same as the drive, but because both are made with a short swing and more wrist play, without the need of weight, the rules of footwork may be more safely discarded and body position not so carefully considered. Both these shots are essentially defensive, and are labour-saving devices when your opponent is on the base-line. A chop or slice is very hard to drive, and will break up any driving game. It is not a shot to use against a volley, as it is too slow to pass and too high to cause any worry. It should be used to drop short, soft shots at the feet of the net man as he comes in. Do not strive to pass a net man with a chop or slice, except through a big opening. The drop-shot is a very soft, sharply-angled chop stroke, played wholly with the wrist. It should drop within 3 to 5 feet of the net to be of any use. The racquet face passes around the outside of the ball and under it with a distinct "wrist turn." Do not swing the racquet from the shoulder in making a drop shot. The drop shot has no relation to a stop-volley. The drop shot is all wrist. The stop-volley has no wrist at all. Use all your wrist shots, chop, slice, and drop, merely as an auxilliary to your orthodox game. They are intended to upset your opponent's game through the varied spin on the ball. 56 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS THE HALF VOLLEY I have now reached the climax of tennis skill: the half volley or trap shot. In other words, the pick-up. This shot requires more perfect timing, eyesight, and racquet work than any other, since its margin of safety is smallest and its manifold chances of mishaps numberless. It is a pick-up. The ball meets the ground and racquet face at nearly the same moment, the ball bouncing off the ground, on the strings. This shot is a stiff-wrist, short swing, like a volley with no follow through. The racquet face travels along the ground with a slight tilt over the ball and towards the net, thus holding the ball low; the shot, like all others in tennis, should travel across the racquet face, along the short strings. The racquet face should always be slightly outside the ball. The half volley is essentially a defensive stroke, since it should only be made as a last resort, when caught out of position by your opponent's shot. It is a desperate attempt to extricate yourself from a dangerous position without retreating. Never deliberately half volley. Notwithstanding these truths, there are certain players who have turned the half volley into a point winner. The greatest half volleyer of the past decade — in fact, one of the greatest tennis geniuses of the world— George Caridia, used the stroke suc- cessfully as a point winner. R. N. Williams, the HALF VOLLEY AND COURT POSITION 57 leading exponent of the stroke in the present day, achieves remarkable results with it. Major A. R. F. Kingscote wins many a point, seemingly lost, by his phenomenal half-volley returns, particularly from the base-line. These men turn a defence into an attack, and it pays. So much for the actual strokes of the game. It is in the other departments such as generalship and psychology that matches are won. Just a few sug- gestions as to stroke technique, and I will close this section. Always play your shot with a fixed, definite idea of what you are doing and where it is going. Never hit haphazard. Play all shots across the short strings of the racquet, with the racquet head and handle on the same hitting plane for ground strokes and the head above the handle for volleys. The racquet head should be advanced slightly beyond the wrist for ground strokes. COURT POSITION A tennis court is 39 feet long from base-line to net. Most players think all of that territory is a correct place to stand. Nothing could be farther from the truth. There are only two places in a tennis court that a tennis player should be to await the ball. 1. About 3 feet behind the base-line near the middle of the court, or 58 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS 2. About 6 to 8 feet back from the net and almost opposite the ball. The first is the place for all base-line players. The second is the net position. If you are drawn out of these positions by a shot which you must return, do not remain at the point where you struck the ball, but attain one of the two positions mentioned as rapidly as possible. The distance from the base-line to about io feet from the net may be considered as "no-man's-land" or "the blank." Never linger there, since a deep shot will catch you at your feet. After making your shot from the blank, as you must often do, retreat behind the base-line to await the return, so you may again come forward to meet the ball. If you are drawn in short and cannot retreat safely, continue all the way to the net position. Never stand and watch your shot, for to do so simply means you are out of position for your next stroke. Strive to attain a position so that you always arrive at the spot the ball is going to before it actually arrives. Do your hard running while the ball is in the air, so you will not be hurried in your stroke after it bounces. It is in learning to do this that natural anticipation plays a big role. Some players instinctively know where the next return is going and take position accordingly, while others will never sense it. It is to the latter class that I urge court position, and recommend always coming in from behind the base- HALF VOLLEY AND COURT POSITION 59 line to meet the ball, since it is much easier to run forward than back. Should you be caught at the net, with a short shot to your opponent, do not stand still and let him pass you at will, as he can easily do. Pick out the side where you think he will hit, and jump to it sud- denly as he swings. If you guess right, you win the point. If you are wrong, you are no worse off, since he would have beaten you anyway with his shot. A notable example of this method of anticipation is Norman E. Brookes, who instinctively senses the stroke, and suddenly bobs up in front of your best shot and kills it. Some may say it is luck, but, to my mind, it is the reward of brain work. Your position should always strive to be such that you can cover the greatest possible area of court without sacrificing safety, since the straight shot is the surest, most dangerous, and must be covered. It is merely a question of how much more court than that immediately in front of the ball may be guarded. . A well-grounded knowledge of court position saves many points, to say nothing of much breath expended in long runs after hopeless shots. It is the phenomenal knowledge of court position that allows A. R. F. Kingscote, a very short man, to attack so consistently from the net. Wallace F. Johnson is seldom caught out of position, so his game is one of extreme ease. One seldom sees 60 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS Johnson running hard on a tennis court. He is usually there awaiting the ball's arrival Save your steps by using your head. It pays in the end. Time spent in learning where to play on a tennis court is well expended, since it returns to you in the form of matches won, breath saved, and energy conserved. It is seldom you need cover more than two-thirds of a tennis court, so why worry about the unneces- sary portions of it? PART II: THE GENERAL LAWS OF TOURNAMENT TENNIS PART II: THE GENERAL LAWS OF TOURNAMENT TENNIS CHAPTER VI TENNIS PSYCHOLOGY TENNIS psychology is nothing more than understanding the workings of your oppon- ent's mind, and gauging the effect of your own game on his mental viewpoint, and understanding the mental effects resulting from the various external causes on your own mind. You cannot be a suc- cessful psychologist of others without first under- standing your own mental processes, you must study the effect on yourself of the same happening under different circumstances. You react differently in different moods and under different conditions. You must realize the effect on your game of the re- sulting irritation, pleasure, confusion, or whatever form your reaction takes. Does it increase your efficiency? If so, strive for it, but never give it to /our opponent. Does it deprive you of concentration? If so, either remove the cause, or if that is not possible strive to ignore it. 63 64 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS Once you have judged accurately your own re- action to conditions, study your opponents', to decide their temperaments. Like temperaments react similarly, and you may judge men of your own type by yourself. Opposite temperaments you must seek to compare with people whose reactions you know. A person who can control his own mental pro- cesses stands an excellent chance of reading those of another, for the human mind works along definite lines of thought, and can be studied. One can only control one's mental processes after carefully studying them. A steady phlegmatic base-line player is seldom a keen thinker. If he was he would not adhere to the base-line. The physical appearance of a man is usually a pretty clear index to his type of mind. The stolid, easy-going man, who usually advocates the base-line game, does so because he hates to stir up his torpid mind to think out a safe method of reaching the net. There is the other type of base-line player, who prefers to remain on the back of the court while directing an attack intended to break up your game. He is a very darfgerous player, and a deep, keen- thinking antagonist. He achieves his results by mixing up his length and direction, and worrying you with the variety of his game. He is a good psychologist. Such players include J. C. Parke, Wallace F. Johnson, and Charles S. Garland. The first type of player mentioned merely hits the ball PLATE VI THE AMERICAN TWIST SERVICE. THE START OF THE SWING Notice the position of the feet in relation to the baseline. The ball high over head. The eyes of the server fixed on the ball and the general slope forward to the entire body. PLATE VII THE AMERICAN TWIST SERVICE. END OF THE SWING Notice the weight thrown forward. The swing ends on the right side of the head. The wrist is bent and the racquet travels away from the body from left to right. The ball is struck under the racquet face. In this picture the reader is looking through the strings from above. The left arm is used to balance the body. TENNIS PSYCHOLOGY 65 with little idea of what he is doing, while the latter always has a definite plan and adheres to it. The hard-hitting, erratic, net-rushing player is a creature of impulse. There is no real system to his attack, no understanding of your game. He will make brilliant coups on the spur of the moment, largely by instinct; but there is no mental power of con- sistent thinking. It is an interesting, fascinating type. Such men as Harold Throckmorton, B. I. C. Norton, and at times R. N. Williams, are examples, although Williams is really a better psychologist than this sounds. The dangerous man is the player who mixes his style from back to fore court at the direction of an ever-alert mind. This is the man to study and learn from. He is a player with a definite purpose. A player who has an answer to every query you pro- pound him in your game. He is the most subtle antagonist in the world. He is of the school of Brookes. Second only to him is the man of dogged determination that sets his mind on one plan and adheres to it, bitterly, fiercely fighting to the end, with never a thought of change. He is the man whose psychology is easy to understand, but whose mental viewpoint is hard to upset, for he never allows himself to think of anything except the busi- ness at hand. This man is your Johnston or your Wilding. I respect the mental capacity of Brookes more, but I admire the tenacity of purpose of Johnston. Pick out your type from your own mental proc- 66 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS esses, and then work out your game along the lines best suited to you. Few of us have the mental brilliance of Brookes; but all can acquire the dogged determination of Johnston, even if we have not his tennis ability. When two men are in the same class as regards stroke equipment, the determining factor in any given match is the mental viewpoint. Luck, so-called, is often grasping the psychological value of a break in the game, and turning it to your own account. We hear a great deal about the "shots we have made." Few realize the importance of the "shots we have missed." The science of missing shots is as important as that of making them, and at times a miss by an inch is of more value than a return that is killed by your opponent. Let me explain. A player drives you far out of court with an angle shot. You run hard to it, and reaching, drive it hard and fast down the side- line, missing it by an inch. Your opponent is surprised and shaken, realizing that your shot might as well have gone in as out. He will expect you to try it again, and will not take the risk next time. He will try to play the ball, and may fall into error. You have thus taken some of your opponent's con- fidence, and increased his chance of error, all by a miss. If you had merely popped back that return, and it had been killed, your opponent would have felt increasingly confident of your inability to get the TENNIS PSYCHOLOGY 67 ball out of his reach, while you would merely have been winded without result. Let us suppose you made the shot down the side- line. It was a seemingly impossible get. First it amounts to two points in that it took one away from your opponent that should have been his and gave you one you ought never to have had. It also worries your opponent, as he feels he has thrown away a big chance. The psychology of a tennis match is very inter- esting, but easily understandable. Both men start with equal chances. Once one man establishes a real lead, his confidence goes up, while his opponent worries, and his mental viewpoint becomes poor. The sole object of the first man is to hold his lead, thus holding his confidence. If the second player pulls even or draws ahead, the inevitable reaction occurs with even a greater contrast in psychology. There is the natural confidence of the leader now with the second man as well as that great stimulus of having turned seeming defeat into probable vic- tory. The reverse in the case of the first player is apt to hopelessly destroy his game, and collapse follows. It is this twist in tennis psychology that makes it possible to win so many matches after they are seemingly lost. This is also the reason that a man who has lost a substantial lead seldom turns in the ultimate victory. He cannot rise above the de- pression caused by his temporary slump. The value of an early lead cannot be overestimated. It is 68 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS the ability to control your mental processes, and not worry unduly over early reverses, that makes a great match player. Playing to the score is the first requisite of a thinking match player. The two crucial points in any game are the third and fourth. If the first two points are divided for 15-all, the third means an advantage gained. If won by you, you should strive to consolidate it by taking the next for 40—15 and two chances for game, while if lost, you must draw even at 30-all to have an even chance for game. In order to do this, be sure to always put the ball in play safely, and do not take unnecessary chances, at 15-all or 30-15. Always make the server work to hold his delivery. It worries him to serve long games, and increases the nervous strain of the match. In the game score the sixth, seventh, and eighth games are the crux of every close set. These games may mean 4-2 or 3-all, 5-2 or 4-3, the most vital advantage in the match, or 5-3 or 4-all, a matter of extreme moment to a tiring player. If ahead, you should strive to hold and increase your lead. If behind, your one hope of victory rests in cutting down the advantage of the other man before one slip means defeat. 5-2 is usually too late to start a rally, but 4-3 is a real chance. Never throw away a set because a player has a lead of 4-1, or even 5-1, unless you already have two sets in a ^-set match, and do not wish to risk TENNIS PSYCHOLOGY 69 tiring by trying to pull it out, and possibily failing at 6-4. The great advantage of 3-1 on your own service is a stumbling-block for many players, for they unconsciously let up at the fifth game, thinking they have a 2-game lead. However, by dropping that game, the score will go 2-3 and 3-all if your opponent holds service, instead of 1-4 and 4-2, thus retaining a distinct advantage and discouraging your opponent in that set. The first set is vital in a 2 out of 3 match. Play for all of it. The second and third sets are the turning-point in a best of 5-set match. Take the first where possible, but play to the limit for the next two. Never allow a 3 out of 5-set match to go to the fifth set if it is possible to win in less; but never give up a match until the last point is played, even if you are two sets and five games down. Some occurrence may turn the tide in your favour. A notable example of such a match occurred at Newport, in 19 16. Wallace F. Johnson and Joseph J. Armstrong were playing Ichija Kumagae, the famous Japanese star, and Harold A. Throck- morton, then Junior Champion of America, in the second round of the doubles. It was Kumagae's first year in America, and he did not understand Americans and their customs well. Kumagae and Throckmorton were leading one set at 6-0, 5-1, and 40-15, Kumagae serving. Throckmorton turned and spoke to him, and the Japanese star did not understand what he said. He served without knowing, and Armstrong passed 70 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS him down the centre. Johnson duplicated the feat in the next court, and Kumagae grew flustered. Throckmorton, not understanding, tried to steady him without result, as Kumagae double-faulted to Armstrong, and he, too, grew worried. Both men began missing, and Johnson and Armstrong pulled out the set and won the match in a runaway in the last stanza. Johnson and Armstrong met W. M. Johnston and C. J. Griffin, the National Champions, in the final and defeated them in five sets, inflicting the only reverse the title-holders suffered during their two-year reign as champions. Another much more regrettable incident occurred in the famous match between R. L. Murray of California and George M. Church of New York in the fourth round of the American National Cham- pionship in 19 1 6. George Church, then at the crest of his wonderful game, had won the first two sets and was leading Murray in the third, when the famous Californian started a sensational rally. Murray, with his terrific speed, merry smile, and genial personality, has always been a popular figure with the public, and when he began his seemingly hopeless fight, the crowd cheered him wildly. He broke through Church's service and drew even amid a terrific din. Church, always a very high-strung, nervous player, showed that the crowd's partiality was getting on his nerves. The gallery noticed it, and became more partisan than ever. The spirit of mob rule took hold, and for once they lost all sense of sportsmanship. They clapped errors as TENNIS PSYCHOLOGY 71 they rained from Church's racquet; the great game collapsed under the terrific strain, and Church's last chance was gone. Murray won largely as he wanted, in the last two sets. No one regretted the incident more than Murray himself, for no finer sportsman steps upon the court than this player, yet there was nothing that could be done. It was a case of external conditions influencing the psychol- ogy of one man so greatly that it cost him a victory that was his in justice. The primary object in match tennis is to break up the other man's game. The first lesson to learn is to hold your nerve under all circumstances. If you can break a player's nerve by pounding at a weak- ness, do it. I remember winning a 5-set doubles match many years ago, against a team far over the class of my partner and myself, by lobbing con- tinually to one man until he cracked under the strain and threw the match away. He became so afraid of a lob that he would not approach the net, and his whole game broke up on account of his lack of confidence. Our psychology was good, for we had the confidence to continue our plan of attack even while losing two of the first three sets. His was bad, for he lost his nerve, and let us know it. Sensational and unexpected shots at crucial mo- ments have won many a match. If your opponent makes a marvellous recovery and wins by it, give him full credit for it, and then forget it, for by worrying over it you not only lose that point but several others as well, while your mind is still wan- 72 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS dering. Never lose your temper over your oppon- ent's good shots. It is bad enough to lose it at your own bad ones. Remember that usually the loser of a match plays just as well as the winner allows him. Never lose your temper at a bad de- cision. It never pays, and has cost many a match. I remember a famous match in Philadelphia, be- tween Wallace F. Johnson, the fifth ranking player in America, and Stanley W. Pearson, a local star, in the Interclub tennis league of that city. Johnson, who had enjoyed a commanding lead of a set and 4-1, had slumped, and Pearson had pulled even at a set-all, and was leading at 5—1 and 40-15, point set match. He pulled Johnson far out to the fore- hand and came to the net. Johnson chopped viciously down the side-line, but Pearson volleyed to Johnson's deep backhand corner. Johnson had started running in that direction as he hit his return, and arrived almost as Pearson's volley bounced. Unfortunately Johnson slipped and went down on both knees, but held his racquet. He reached the ball and chopped it down the side-line for an earned point before Pearson realized he had even offered at it. Pearson was so surprised and angered that he double-faulted for deuce, and Johnson won the game. Johnson pulled even at 5-all, before Pearson recovered his equilibrium, and finally won the set at 17-15. Truly Pearson's lapse at Johnson's mar- vellous get was a costly mental break. Tennis psychology is far more than the effect of TENNIS PSYCHOLOGY 73 certain shots, made or missed, on the player. One can sum up such things by saying that every kill gives confidence, every error tends to destroy it. These things are obvious. The branch of psychol- ogy that is interesting is the reaction on the various players of different courts, different crowds, and other players. There is a peculiar atmosphere about the centre court at Wimbledon that is unique in my knowledge of the game. Certain players revel in it. The majority do not feel it, and since they do not sense it, they find only the material disadvantages of rather bad light, and much noise from the stand, and dislike the centre court. Personally, I enjoy playing on the centre court at Wimbledon more than any court I have ever stepped upon. The traditions of the great players of the past, the notable personages that make up the parties in the Royal Box and Committee Box, the honour of a visit from their Majesties the King and Queen, and, above all, the generous, non-partisan, sports- manlike attitude of the British public, make it a unique privilege to enter the centre court in cham- pionship competition. These things , inspire the mind to an almost abnormal keenness. It is this atmosphere that made N. E. Brookes, Anthony F. Wilding, A. W. Gore, R. F. and H. L. Doherty more dangerous there than anywhere else. It is this factor that spurs on J. C. "Parke and A. R. F. Kingscote to their greatest tennis to-day. The great championship turf at Forest Hills, *74 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS where the American Championship is held, offers a unique contrast to Wimbledon. The age of Wimbledon is its great attraction. It is the spirit of youth, of progress, of business-like mechanical perfection of management, and the enormous crowds and attendant enthusiasm that is the chief attraction at Forest Hills. Fully 15,000 were present on the closing day of the event in 19 19. Orderly, courteous, enthusiastic, but partisan, the American tennis public comes out to cheer on its favourite. No people in the world appreciate visiting players more whole-heartedly and none do more for their comfort than the American people. It is partisan, personal, sporting friendliness, warmer yet not so correct as the manner of the British public, that the Americans give. We have much to learn from our British friends. Yet I hope we will never sacrifice the warmth of feeling that at times may run away with us, yet in the main is the chief attraction of the American p©ople. It is this enthusiasm that spurs on the men to their greatest efforts in the National Championship. The Australian team, Norman E. Brookes, Gerald Patterson, Randolph Lycett, and R. V. Thomas, who visited the United States in 19 19, scored a unique personal triumph. The whole gal- lery present at the notable match in the Champion- ship, when Patterson went down to defeat in a terrific 5-set struggle with W. M. Johnston, rose and cheered Patterson as he walked off the court. It was a real ovation; a tribute to his sportsman- TENNIS PSYCHOLOGY 75 ship, and an outburst of personal admiration. Brookes was the recipient of an equal demonstra- tion on his final appearance at Forest Hills. The stimulus of the surroundings produced the highest tennis of which these men were capable. Yet in all championships it is the personal ele- ment that is ( the moving factor. Personalities are the deciding force in popularity. Patriotism is partially submerged in personality. The Davis Cup matches bring out the gamest struggles in the history of tennis. It is in these unique series of matches that the fame of Anthony F. Wilding, Norman E. Brookes, J. C. Parke, B. C. Wright, M. E. M'Loughlin, and others reached its crest. It was the unselfish giving of one's best, under all conditions, for the honour of the country that called out the finest tennis in each man. Parke reached his crest in his memorable defeat of Brookes. M'Loughlin has never quite equalled his marvellous game of 19 14 against Brookes and Wild- ing. It is the psychology of patriotism that brings out this tennis. Personality is submerged. Unity of purpose as a team, replaces the object of personal glory that is the keynote of championship. It is the friendly rivalry of sport, between such men as form the backbone of tennis in each country, that does more for international understanding than all the notes ever written from the White House. I could go on writing tennis psychology as ex- 76 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS plained by external conditions for hundreds of pages, but all I want to do is to bring to mind a definite idea of the value of the mind in the game. Stimulate it how you will, a successful tennis player must admit the value of quick mind. Do it by a desire for personal glory, or team success, or by a love of competition in matching your wits against the other man T s, but do it some way. Do. not think that tennis is merely a physical exercise. It is a mutual cock-tail of a very high "kick." CHAPTER VII MATCH PLAY THE first and most important point in match play is to know how to lose. Lose cheer- fully, generously, and like a sportsman. This is the first great law of tennis, and the second is like unto it — to win modestly, cheerfully, generously, and like a sportsman. The object of match play is to win, but no credit goes to a man who does not win fairly and squarely. A victory is a defeat if it is other than fair. Yet again I say to win is the object, and to do so, one should play to the last ounce of his strength, the last gasp of his'breath, and the last scrap of his nerve. If you do so and lose, the better man won. If you do not, you have robbed your opponent of his right of beating your "best. Be fair to both him and yourself. "The Play's the thing," and in match play a good defeat is far more creditable than a hollow victory. Play tennis for the game's sake. Play it for the men you meet, the friends you make, and the pleasure you may give to the public by the hard- working yet sporting game that is owed them by their presence at the match. Many tennis players feel they owe the public 77 78 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS nothing, and are granting a favour by playing. It is my belief that when the public so honours a player that they attend matches, that player is in duty bound to give of his best, freely, willingly, and cheerfully, for only by so doing can he repay the honour paid him. The tennis star of to-day owes his public as much as the actor owes the audience, and only by meeting his obligations can tennis be retained in public favour. The players get their reward in the personal popularity they gain by their conscientious work. There is another factor that is even stronger than this, that will always produce fine tennis in cham- pionship events. It is the competitive spirit that is the breath of life to every true sportsman: the desire to prove to himself he can beat the best of the other man ; the real regret that comes when Jie wins, and feels the loser was not at his best. It is that which has made popular idols of Anthony F. Wilding, M. E. M'Loughlin, and other famous players. It is the great attraction of J. C. Parke, A. R. F. Kingscote, W. M. Johnston, Andre Gobert, W. Laurentz, and many other stars. It is the sign of a true sportsman. The keen competitive spirit that stimulates a match player also increases the nervous strain. This should be recognized by tournament commit- tees, and the conditions of play should be as nearly standardized as weather permits." A tournament committee should never keep a player waiting for an important match to commence MATCH PLAY 79 while they scour through the crowd for linesmen. These necessary, and I trust useful, accessories to every match of importance should be picked and on hand when the players appear. A good linesman is a great aid to match tennis. A poor one may ruin a great battle. Not only will bad decisions turn the tide by putting a point in the wrong col- umns, but slow decisions will often upset players, so they dare not play to the line kept by slumberous linesmen. A linesman should take his first judgment as the ball strikes. If outside he should call "out" at once clearly, decisively, but not too loudly; a yell is often a shock to the nerves. If the ball is good he should remain discreetly silent. The umpire should announce the score after each point in a voice sufficiently loud to be heard by the entire galLery. His decisions as to "lets" or balls "not up" should be made only loud enough to ensure that they are heard by the players. The gallery has eyes. Following each game, the game score should be called, giving the leading player's name and the set being played. For example, "Four games to three, Parke leads. Second set." About every third game following the completion of the first set, an announcement as to the winner of the first set is a«n excellent idea. The umpire could add to the above announcement, "First set, Parke, 6-3." This latter announcement is unnecessary when there is a score board that gives full details of the match. 80 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS Tournament committees should see that all courts have sufficient room behind the base-line and at the sides to insure a player against running into the stops. Galleries should strive to retain their apprecia- tion and enthusiasm until a point is completed, since noise is very disconcerting to a player. However, all players enjoy an enthusiastic gallery. The players themselves must now be considered in relation to the reaction of the match. The first thing to fix firmly in your mind in play- ing a match, is never to allow your opponent to play a shot he likes if it is possible to force him to make one he does not. Study your opponent both on and off the court. Look for a weakness, and, once finding it, pound it without mercy. Re- member that you do not decide your mode of at- tack. It is decided for you by the weakness of your opponent. If he dislikes to meet a netman, go to the net. If he wants you at the net, stay back and force him to come in. If he attacks viciously, meet his attack with an equally strong offensive. Remember that the strongest defence is to at- tack, for if the other man is occupied in meeting your attack, he will have less time to formulate) his own system. If you are playing a very steady man, do not strive to beat him at his own game. He is better at it than you in many cases, so go in and hit to win. On the other hand, if you find that your PLATE VIII THE FOREHAND VOLLEY Notice the body at right angles to the net, the left foot advanced to the shot, the weight evenly distributed on the feet, the wrist slightly below the racquet head, the racquet head itself slightly tilted, to lift the volley, and the whole movement a "block" of the ball. The wrist is stiff. There is no swing. The eyes are down, watching the ball. The left arm is the balance wheel. The body crouched and the knees bent. PLATE IX THE BACKHAND VOLLEY The body position and weight control and balance are the same as in the forehand volley. The crouch is more pronounced as the hitting plane is lower. The head of the racquet is firmly blocked by the stiff, locked wrist. The eyes are centered on the ball, which has just left the racquet. MATCH PLAY 81 opponent is wild and prone to miss, play safe and reap the full crop of his errors. It saves you trouble and takes his confidence. Above all, never change a winning game. Always change a losing game } since, as you are getting beaten that way, you are no worse off and may be better with a new style. The overstrain of changing a losing game is a very serious thing. It is hard to say just when you are really beaten. If you feel you are playing well yet have lost the first set about 6-3 or 6-4, with the loss of only one service, you should not change. Your game is not really a losing game. It is simply a case of one break of service, and might well win the next set. If, however, you have dropped the Erst set in a 2 out of 3 match with but one or two games, now you are outclassed and should try something else. Take chances when you are behind, never when ahead. Risks are only worth while when you have everything to win and nothing to lose. It may spell victory, and at least will not hasten defeat. Above all, never lose your nerve or confidence in a match. By so doing you have handed your oppo- nent about two points a game — a rather hard handicap to beat. at your best. Never let your opponent know you are worried. Never show fatigue or pain if it is possible to avoid, since it will only give him confidence. Remember that he feels just as bad as you, and any sign of weakening on your part encourages him to go on. 82 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS In other words, keep your teeth always in the match. Don't worry. Don't fuss. Luck evens up in the long run, and to worry only upsets your own game without affecting your opponent. A smile wins a lot of points because it gives the impression of con- fidence on your part that shakes that of the other man. Fight all the time. The harder the strain the harder you should fight, but do it easily, happily, and enjoy it. Match play, where both men are in the same class as tennis players, resolves itself into a battle of wits and nerve. The man who uses the first and retains the second is the ultimate victor. I do not believe in a man who expects to go through a long tournament, going "all out" for every match. Conserve your strength and your finesse for the times you need them, and win your other matches decisively, but not destructively. Why should a great star discourage and dishearten a player several classes below him by crushing him, as he no doubt could? A few games a set, well earned, would be a big factor in encouraging that rising player to play in tournaments, while it would in no way injure the reputation of the star. .Never hurry your opponent by serving before he is fully set to receive. This is a favourite trick of a few unscrupulous players, yet is really an unfair advantage. Do your hurrying after the ball is in play, by running him to unexpected places in the court. Should anyone attempt to work the hurried MATCH PLAY 83 service on you, after several attempts, proving it is intentional, let the ball go by and say "not ready." The server will shortly realize that you will take your time regardless of him, and he will slow up. I do not advocate stalling — nothing is worse. It is a breach of ethics that is wholly uncalled for. Play the game naturally, and give your opponent full courtesy in all matters. If you do, you will receive it in return. Take every advantage of any and every weak- ness in your opponent's game; but never trespass on his rights as regards external advantages. Personally I do not believe in "defaulting" a match. To "scratch" or "retire," as the term goes, is to cheat your opponent of his just triumph, and you should never do this unless it is absolutely im- possible to avoid. Sickness or some equally impor- tant reason should be the sole cause of scratching, for you owe the tournament your presence once your entry is in. Match play should stimulate a player. He should produce his best under the excitement of competi- tion. Learn your shots in practice, but use them in matches. Practice is played with the racquet, matches are won by the mind. J. C. Parke is a great match player, because he is not only a great player but a great student of men. He sizes up his opponent, and seizes every opening and turns it to his own account. Norman E. Brookes is the greatest match player the world has ever known, because he is ever 84 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS ready to change his plan to meet the strategy of his opponent, and has both the variety of stroke and versatility of intellect to outguess the other the majority of times. Brookes is the greatest court general, and, in my opinion, the finest tennis intel- lect in the world. His mind is never so keen and he is never so dangerous as when he is trailing in an important match. He typifies all that is great in mental match tennis. A great star is always at his best in a match, as it stimulates his mental and physical faculties to the utmost. Certain players are more effective against some men than others who are not so good. It is the uncertainty of match tennis that is its greatest charm. Two men may meet for tennis during a season, and be so closely matched that each man will win two matches and the score seem almost one-sided each time. It is a case of getting the jump on the other player. During 19 19 Johnston and I met four times. Twice he defeated me, once in four sets, and once in three, while the top victories that were mine were scored in identically the same number of sets. The most remarkable meeting of two stars was the series of matches between R. L. Murray and Ichija Kumagae during the seasons of 19 18 and 19 19. In the early stages Murray had a decided advantage, winning from Kumagae consistently, but by close scores. Early in 19 19 Kumagae unexpectedly de- feated Murray at Buffalo in four sets. From that MATCH PLAY 85 moment Kumagae held the whip hand. He defeated Murray at Niagara-on-the-Lake a week later. Murray barely nosed out the Japanese star at Cleveland in five sets after Kumagae had the match won, only to have Kumagae again defeat him in a terrific match at Newport in August. Kumagae's game is very effective against Murray, because Murray, essentially a volleyer, could not exchange ground strokes with the Japanese star player successfully, and could not stand the terrific pace of rushing the net at every opportunity. Kuma- gae conclusively proved his slight superiority over Murray last season. Vincent Richards, who is not yet the equal of Murray, scored two clean-cut victories over Kuma- gae during the same period. Why should Richards worry Kumagae, who is certainly Murray's superior, and yet not cause Murray trouble? The answer lies in this style of game. Richards uses a peculiar chop stroke from the base-line that is very steady. He can meet Kumagae at his own base-line game until he gets a. chance to close in to the net, where his volleying is remarkable. The result is, against Kumagae's driving he is perfectly at home. Murray is a vicious net player who swept Richards off his feet. The boy has not the speed on his ground strokes to pass Murray, who volleys off his chop for points, and cannot take the net away from him as he cannot handle the terrific speed of Murray's game. Thus Murray's speed beats Richards, while Richards' steadiness troubles 86 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS Kumagae, yet Kumagae's persistent driving tires Murray and beats him. What goqd are compara- tive scores? Charles S. Garland always defeats Howard Voshell, yet loses to men whom Voshell defeats. Williams proves a stumbling-block to Johnston, yet seldom does well against me. The moral to be drawn from the ever-interesting upsets that occur every year, is that the style of your attack should be determined by the man's weakness you are playing. Suit your style to his weakness. A chop is the antidote for the drive. The volley is the answer to a chop, yet a drive is the only safe attack against a volley. The smash will kill a lob, yet a lob is the surest defence from a smash. Rather a complicated condition, but one which it would do well to think over. The most dangerous enemy to R. N. Williams is a steady base-liner of second class. Williams is apt to crush a top-flight player in a burst of superlative terms, yet fall a victim to the erratic streak that is in him when some second-class player plays pat- ball with him. Such defeats were his portion at the hands of Ritchie and Mavrogordato in England, yet on the same trip he scored notable victories over Parke and Johnston. Abnormal conditions for match play always tend to affect the better player more than the poorer, and bring play to a level. The reason for this is in the fact that the higher the standard of a player's game, the smaller his MATCH PLAY 87 margin of error, the more perfect his bound must be, and any variation from the normal is apt to spell error. The average player allows himself more leeway, and unknowingly increases his chances on a bad court. His shot is not judged to the fraction of an inch in swing as is the top-flight player, so ft slight variation does not affect him. Many a great match has been ruined by abnormal conditions. Rain caused Williams' downfall to N. W. Niles in the 19 17 American Championships. Rain and wind marred a great battle between Gobert and Johnston at Eastbourne in the Davis Cup in 1920. The clever match player must always be willing to change his game to meet conditions. Failure to do so may spell defeat. It is this uncertainty, due to external conditions, that makes comparative records so useless in judging the relative merits of two players you know nothing of. Rankings based on mathematical calculations of scores are absolutely useless and childish, unless tempered by common sense. The question of the fitness of conditions of play can never be standardized. In America you play only if clear. In England sometimes when clear but more often in rain, judging by the events I swam through in my recent trip. A match player should not only be able to play tennis, but should combine the virtues of an aeroplane and a submarine as well. CHAPTER VIII PHYSICAL FITNESS PHYSICAL fitness is one of the great essentials of match play. Keenness can only be acquired if the physical, mental, and nervous systems are in tune. Consistent and systematic training is essential to a tournament player. Regular hours of sleep, and regular, hearty food at regular hours are necessary to keep the body at its highest efficiency. Food is particularly impor- tant. Eat well, but do not over-eat, particularly immediately before playing. I believe in a large hearty breakfast on the day of a big match. This should be taken by nine-thirty. A moderate lunch at about one o'clock if playing at three. Do not eat very rich food at luncheon as it tends to slow you up on the court. Do not run the risk of indiges- tion, which is the worst enemy to clear eyesight. Rich, heavy food immediately before retiring is bad, as it is apt to make you "loggy" on the court the next day. It is certain injury to touch alcoholic drink in any form during tournament play. Alcohol is a poison that affects the eye, the mind, and the wind — three essentials in tennis. Tobacco in moderation does 88 PHYSICAL FITNESS 89 little harm, although it, too, hits eye and wind. A man who is facing a long season of tournament play should refrain from either alcohol or tobacco in any form. Excesses of any kind are bad for physical condition, and should not be chanced. Late hours cause sluggishness of mind and body the next day. It is very dangerous to risk them before a hard match. The moving pictures immedi- ately before playing tennis are bad, owing to the eye strain caused by the flicker of the film and the strong light of the camera. Lead a normal, healthy life, and conserve your nervous force wherever pos- sible, as you will need it in the hard matches. "Staieness" is the great enemy of players who play long seasons. It is a case of too much tennis. Staieness is seldom physical weariness. A player can always recover his strength by rest. Staieness is a mental fatigue due often to worry or too close attention to tennis, and not enough variety of thought. Its symptoms are a dislike for the tennis game and its surroundings, and a lack of interest in the match when you are on the court. I advocate a break in training at such a time. Go to the theatre or a concert, and get your mind completely off tennis. Do your worrying about tennis while you are playing it, and forget the unpleasantness of bad play once you are off the court. Always have some outside interest you can turn to for relaxation during a tournament; but never allow it to interfere with your tennis when you should be intent on your game. A nice balance is hard to achieve, but! once 90 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS attained is a great aid to a tournament player. I find my relaxation in auction bridge. I know many other players who do likewise. Among them are Mrs. Franklin Mallory, Wallace F. Johnson, W. M. Johnston and Samuel Hardy. The laws of training should be closely followed before and after a match. Do not get chilled before a match, as it makes you stiff and slow. Above all else do not stand around without a wrap after a match when you are hot or you will catch cold. Many a player has acquired a touch of rheuma- tism from wasting time at the close of his match in- stead of getting his shower while still warm. That slight stiffness the next day may mean defeat. A serious chill may mean severe illness. Do not take chances. Change your wet clothes to dry ones between matches if you are to play twice in a day. It will make you feel better, and also avoid the risk of cold. Tournament players must sacrifice some pleasures for the sake of success. Training will win many a match for a man if he sticks to it. Spasmodic training is useless, and should never be attempted. The condition a player is in is apt to decide his mental viewpoint, and aid him in accustoming him- self to the external conditions of play. All match players should know a little about the phenomenon of crowd-psychology since, as in the case of the Church-Murray match I related some PHYSICAL FITNESS 91 time back, the crowd may play an important part in the result. It seldom pays to get a crowd down on you. It always pays to win its sympathy. I do not mean play to the gallery, for that will have the opposite effect than the one desired. The gallery is always for the weaker player. It is a case of helping the u under-dog." If you are a consistent winner you must accustom yourself to having the gallery show partiality for your oppo- nent. It is no personal dislike of you. It is merely a natural reaction in favour of the loser. Some- times a bad decision to one play will win the crowd's sympathy for him. Galleries are eminently just in their desires, even though at times their emotions run away with them. Quite aside from the effect on the gallery, I wish to state here that when you are the favoured one in a decision that you know is wrong, strive to equal- ize it if possible by unostentatiously losing the next point. Do not hit the ball over the back stop or into the bottom of the net with a jaunty air of "Here you are." Just hit it slightly out or in the net, and go on about your business in the regular way. Your opponent always knows when you ex- tend him this justice, and he appreciates it, even though he does not expect it. Never do it for effect. It is extremely bad taste. Only do it when your sense of justice tells you you should. The crowd objects, and justly so, to a display of real temper on the court. A player who loses his 92 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS head must expect a poor reception from the gallery. Questioned decisions by a player only put him in a bad light with the crowd and cannot alter the point. You may know the call was wrong, but grin at it, alnd the crowd will join you. These things are the essence of good sportsmanship, and good sportsmanship will win any gallery. The most un- attractive player in the world will win the respect and admiration of a crowd by a display of real sportsmanship at the time of test. Any player who really enjoys a match for the game's sake will always be a fine sportsman, for there is no amusement to a match that does not give your opponent his every right. A. player who plays for the joy of the game wins the crowd the first time he steps on the court. All the world loves an optimist. The more tennis I play, the more I appreciate my sense of humour. I seldom play a match when I do not get a smile out of some remark from the gallery, while I know that the gallery always enjoys at least one hearty laugh at my expense. I do not begrudge it them, for I know how very peculiar tennis players in general, and myself in particular, appear when struggling vainly to reach a shot hope- lessly out of reach. Two delightful elderly ladies were witnessing Charles S. Garland and myself struggle against Mavrogordato and Riseley at the Edgbaston tour- nament in England in 1920. One turned to the other and said: "Those are the Americans!" PHYSICAL FITNESS 93 "Oh," said the second lady resignedly, "I thought so. The tall one [meaning me] looks rather queer." During the Davis Cup match against the French at Eastbourne, I went on the court against Laurentz in my blue "woolly" sweater. The day was cold, and I played the match 4-1 in Laurentz' favour, still wearing it. I started to remove it at the be- ginning of the sixth game, when the gallery burst into loud applause, out of which floated a sweet feminine voice: "Good! Now maybe the poor boy will be able to play!" For the first time I realized just what the gallery thought of my efforts to play tennis, and also of the handicap of the famous "blue-bearskin" as they termed it My favourite expression during my Davis Cup trip happened to be "Peach" for any particularly good shot by my opponent. The gallery at the Championship, quick to appreciate any mannerism of a player, and to know him by it, enjoyed the remark on many occasions as the ball went floating by me. In my match with Kingscote in the final set, the court was very slippery owing to the heavy drizzle that had been falling throughout the match. At 3-2 in my favour, I essayed a journey to the net, only to have Kingscote pass me 'cross court to my backhand. I turned and started rapidly for the shot murmuring "Peach" as I went. Suddenly my feet went out and I rolled over on the ground, sliding some distance, mainly on my face. I arose, 94 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS dripping, just in time to hear, sotto voce, in the gal- lery at my side: "A little bit crushed, that Peach." The sense of humour of the speaker was delightful. The whole side-line howled with joy, and the joke was on me. I am always the goat for the gallery in these little jokes, because it is seldom I can refrain from saying something loud enough to be heard. I remember an incident that caused great joy to a large gallery in Philadelphia during a match be- tween two prominent local players. One of the men had been charging the net and volleying consistently off the frame of his racquet, giving a wonderful dis- play of that remarkable shot known the world over as "the mahogany volley." His luck was phenome- nal for all his mis-hit volleys won him points. Fin- ally, at the end of a bitterly contested deuce game in the last set he again won the deciding point with a volley off the wood, just as a small insect flew in his eye. He called to his opponent: "Just a moment, I have a fly in my eye." The disgusted opponent looked up and muttered : "Fly? Huh! I'll bet it's a splinter!" There was a certain young player who was notori- ously lax in his eyesight on decisions. He could never see one against himself. He became noted in his own locality. He and another boy were playing a team of brothers who were quite famous in the tennis world. One of these brothers had a very severe service that the local Captain Kidd could PHYSICAL FITNESS 95 not handle at all. So each time the visiting player served close to the line, the boy would swing at it, miss it, and call "Fault!" There was no umpire available and there was no question of the older team losing, so they let it go for some time. Finally a service fully 3 feet in was casually called out by the youngster. This proved too much for the server, who hailed his brother at the net with the query: "What was wrong that time?" "I don't know," came the reply; "unless he called a footfault on you !" The assurance of some young players is remark- able. They know far more about the game of other men than the men themselves. I once travelled to a tournament with a boy who casually seated him- self beside me in the train and, seeing my tennis bag, opened the conversation on tennis and tennis players. He finally turned his attention to various people I knew well, and suddenly burst out with: "Tilden is a chop-stroke player. I know him well." I let him talk for about ten minutes, learning things about my game that I never knew before. Finally I asked his name, which he told me. In reply he asked mine. The last view I had of him for some time was a hasty retreat through the door of the car for air. I played my first match against J. C. Parke at Wimbledon in 1920. The time before that I had been on the court with him was at Germantown Cricket Club in 191 1, when I acted as ball-boy in the Davis Cup between him and W. A. Larned. 96 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS The Junior members of the club, sons of the mem- bers, used to consider it a great honour to act as ball-boy in these matches, and worked every means to be picked. I picked up much tennis in those days, for I have worked at the ball-boy position for Parke, Crawley, Dixon, Larned, Wright, and Ward. ^^^ V 01 ■■ * ' 9 1 M 9 i ' m + ^f • * . W m ■ 4 tQgm Mr • • <%- • \~ PLATE 7 THE OVERHEAD SMASH Notice the full reach and upward forward movement of the body. The left arm is again the balancing pole. The eyes are rivetted on the ball. The right leg is too high in the air, but it is due to the speed at which the play was made. CHAPTER IX SINGLES AND DOUBLES SINGLES, the greatest strain in tennis, is the two-handed game. It is in this phase of the game that the personal equation reaches its crest of importance. This is the game of individual effort, mental and physical. A hard 5-set singles match is the greatest strain on the body and nervous system of any form of sport. Richard Harte and L. C. Wister, the former * famous Harvard University football and baseball player, the latter a football star at Princeton, both of whom are famous tennis players, have told me that a close 5-set tennis match was far more wearing on them than the biggest football game they had ever played. Singles is a game of daring, dash, speed of foot and stroke. It is a game of chance far more than doubles. Since you have no partner dependent upon you, you can afford to risk error for the possibility of speedy victory. Much of what I wrote under match play is more for singles than doubles, yet let me call your attention to certain peculiarities of singles from the standpoint of the spectator. A gallery enjoys personalities far more than 97 98 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS styles. Singles brings two people into close and active relations that show the idiosyncrasies of each player far more acutely than doubles. The specta- tor is in the position of a man watching an insect under a microscope. He can analyse the inner workings. The freedom of restraint felt on a single court is in marked contrast to the need for team work in doubles. Go out for your shot in singles whenever there is a reasonable chance of getting it. Hit harder at all times in singles than in doubles, for you have more chance of scoring and can take more risk. Few great singles players are famous in doubles. Notable exceptions to the above statement come to mind at once in the persons of the Dohertys, Norman E. Brookes, and F. B. iUexander. Yet who could accuse W. M. Johnston, R. N. Wil- liams (notwithstanding his World's Championship doubles title), Andre Gobert, the late Anthony F. Wilding, M. E. M'Loughlin, or Gerald Patterson of playing great doubles? All these men are won- derful singles players, playing singles on a double court alongside some suffering partner. The daring that makes for a great singles player is an eternal appeal to a gallery. None of the notable doubles players, who have little or no claim to singles fame, have enjoyed the hero-worship accorded the famous singles stars. H. Roper-Barrett, Stanley Doust, Harold H. Hackett, Samuel Hardy, and Holcombe Ward, all doubles players of the very highest order, SINGLES AND DOUBLES 99 were, and are, well liked and deservedly popular, but are not idolized as were M'Loughlin or Wilding. Singles is a game of the imagination, doubles a science of exact angles. Doubles is four-handed tennis. Enough of this primary reader definition. I only used that so as not to be accused of trying to write over the heads of the uninitiated. It is just as vital to play to your partner in tennis as in bridge. Every time you make a stroke you must do it with a definite plan to avoid putting your partner in trouble. The keynote of doubles success is team work; not individual brilliancy. There is a certain type of team work dependent wholly upon individual brilliancy. Where both players are in the same class, a team is as strong as its weakest player at any given time, for here it is even team work with an equal division of the court that should be the method of play. In the case of one strong player and one weaker player, the team is as good as the strong player can make it by protecting and de- fending the weaker. This pair should develop its team work on the individual brilliancy of the stronger man. The first essential of doubles play is to put the ball in play. A double fault is bad in singles, but it is inexcusable in doubles. The return of service should be certain. After that it should be low and to the server coming in. Do not strive for clean aces in doubles until you have the opening. Remember that to pass two men is a difficult task. 100 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS Always attack in doubles. The net is the only place in the court to play the doubles game, and you should always strive to attain the net position. There are two formations for the receiving team: one is the Australian formation with the receiver's partner standing in to volley the server's return volley; the other is the English and American style with both men back, thus giving the net attack to the server. This is safer, but less likely to produce a winning result unless the team is a wonderful lob- bing combination. Lobbing is a sound defence in doubles, and is used to open the court. I believe in always trying for the kill when you see a real opening. * 'Poach" (go for a shot which is not really on your side of the court) whenever you see a chance to score. Never poach unless you go for the kill. It is a win or nothing shot since it opens your whole court. If you are missing badly do not poach, as it is very disconcerting to your part- ner. The question of covering a doubles court should not be a serious one. With all men striving to attain the net all the time every shot should be built up with that idea. Volley and smash when- ever possible, and only retreat when absolutely necessary. When the ball goes toward the side-line the net player on that side goes in close and toward the line. His partner falls slightly back and to the centre of the court, thus covering the shot between the men. If the next return goes to the other SINGLES AND DOUBLES 101 side, the two men reverse positions. The theory of court covering is two sides of a triangle, with the angle in the centre and the two sides running to the side-lines and in the direction of the net. Each man should cover overhead balls. over his own head, and hit them in the air whenever possible, since to allow them to drop gives the net to the other team. The only time for the partner to protect the overhead is when the net man "poaches," is outguessed, and the ball tossed over his head. Then the server covers and strives for a kill at once. Always be ready to protect your partner, but do not take shots over his head unless he calls for you to, or you see a certain kill. Then say "Mine," step in and hit decisively. The matter of overhead balls, crossing under them, and such incidentals of team work are matters of personal opinion, and should be arranged by each team according to their joint views. I only offer general rules that can be modified to meet the wishes of the individuals. Use the lob as a defence, and to give time to extricate yourself and your partner from a bad posi- tion. The value of service in doubles cannot be too strongly emphasized since it gives the net to the server. Service should always be held. To lose service is an unpardonable sin in first-class doubles. All shots in doubles should be low or very high. Do not hit shoulder-high as it is too easy to kill. Volley down and hard if possible. Every shot you make 102 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS should be made with a definite idea of opening the court. Hit down the centre to disrupt the team work of the opposing team ; but hit to the side-lines for your aces. Pick one man, preferably the weaker of your op- ponents, and centre your attack on him and keep it there. Pound him unmercifully, and in time he should crack under the attack. It is very foolish to alternate attack, since it simply puts both men on their game and tires neither. If your partner starts badly play safely and surely until he rounds to form. Never show annoy- ance with your partner. Do not scold him. He is doing the best he can, and fighting with him does no good. Encourage him at all times and don't worry. A team that is fighting among themselves has little time left to play tennis, and after all tennis is the main object of doubles. Offer suggestions to your partner at any time during a match; but do not insist on his following them, and do not get peevish if he doesn't. He simply does not agree with you, and he may be right. Who knows? Every doubles team should have a leader to direct its play; but that leader must always be willing to drop leadership for any given point when his part- ner has the superior position. It is policy of attack not type of stroke that the leader should determine. Pick a partner and stick to him. He should be a man you like and want to play with, and he should SINGLES AND DOUBLES 103 want to play with you. This will do away with much friction. His style should not be too nearly your own, since you double the faults without greatly increasing the virtues. I am a great believer in a brilliant man teaming up with a steady player. Let your steady man keep the ball in play, and allow your brilliant man all the room he wants to "poach" and kill. Thus you get the best of both men. Doubles is a game of finesse more than speed. The great doubles players, the Dohertys, Norman E. Brookes, the greatest in the world to-day, Roper Barrett, Beals Wright, and F. B. Alexander, are all men of subtle finesse rather than terrific speed. It requires more than speed of shot to beat two men over a barrier 3 to 3^ feet high with a distance of some 32 feet. It is angles, pace, and accuracy that should be the aim in a great doubles game. Resource, versatility, and subtlety, not speed, win doubles matches. PART III: MODERN TENNIS AND ITS FUTURE PART III: MODERN TENNIS AND ITS FUTURE CHAPTER X THE GROWTH OF THE MODERN GAME LAWN tennis is the outgrowth of the old French game of the courts of the early Louis. It spread to England, where it gained a firm hold on public favour. The game divided ; the original form being closely adhered to is the game known in America as "Court tennis," but which is called "Tennis" in England. Lawn tennis grew out of it. The old style game was played over a net some 5 feet high, and the service was always from the same end, the players changing courts each game. It was more on the style of the present game of badminton or battledore and shuttlecock. Gradually the desire for active play had its effect, in a lowered net and changed laws, and tennis, as we know it, grew into being. From its earliest period, which is deeply shrouded in mystery, came the terms of "love" for "nothing" and "deuce" for "40-all." What they meant originally, or how they gained their hold is unknown, but the terms are a tradition X07 108 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS of the game and just as much a part of the scoring system as the "game" or "set" call. In 1920 the Rules Committee of the American Tennis Association advocated a change in scoring that replaced love, 15, 30, 40 with the more compre- hensive 1, 2, 3, 4. The real reason for the proposed change was the belief that the word "love" in tennis made the uninitiated consider the game effemi- nate and repelled possible supporters. The loyal adherents of the old customs of the game proved too strong, and defeated the proposed change in scoring by an overwhelming majority. Personally, I think there is some slight claim to consideration for the removal of the word "love." It can do no good, and there are many substitutes for it. It can easily be eliminated without revolu- tionizing the whole scoring system. It is far easier to substitute the words "zero," "nothing," for "love" than cause such an upheaval as was proposed. In my opinion the best way to obviate the matter is to use the player's name in conjunction with the points won by him, when his opponent has none. If the first point is won by Williams, call the score "15, Williams" and, with his opponent scoring the next, the call would become "15-all." If tennis loses one adherent, it could otherwise gain, simply by its retaining the word "love" in the score, I heartily advocate removing it. This re- moval was successfully accomplished in Chicago in 19 19, with no confusion to players, umpires, or public. THE GROWTH OF THE MODERN GAME 109 However, returning from my little digression on the relative value of "love" and "nothing," let me continue my short history of the game. The play- ing of tennis sprang into public favour so quickly that in a comparatively short space of time it was universally played in England and France. The game was brought to America in the latter part of the nineteenth century. Its growth there in the past twenty-live years has been phenomenal. Dur- ing the last half century tennis gained a firm foothold in all the colonies of the British Empire, and even found favour in the Orient, as is explained in an- other portion of this book. Tennfs fills many needs of mankind. It provides an outlet for physical energy, relaxation, mental stimulus, and healthful exercise. The moral tone is aided by tennis because the first law of tennis is that every player must be a good sportsman and inherently a gentleman. Tennis was recognized by the Allied Governments as one of the most beneficial sports during the World War. Not only were the men in service en- couraged to play whenever possible, but the Allied Governments lent official aid to the various service tournaments held in France following the signing of the Armistice. The importance of tennis in the eyes of the American Government may be gleaned from the fact that great numbers of hard courts' were erected at the various big cantonments, and organized play offered to the soldiers. Many of the leading players who were in training 110 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS in America at the time of the National Champion- ship, which was played solely to raise money for the Red Cross, were granted leave from their va- rious stations to take part in the competition. Among the most notable were Wallace F. Johnson, Conrad B. Doyle, Harold Throckmorton, S. How- ard Voshell, and myself, all of whom were granted leave of two weeks or a month. Captain R. N. Williams and Ensigns William M. Johnston and Maurice E. M'Loughlin, and many other stars, were overseas. Official recognition at such a time puts a stamp of approval on the game which goes far to justify its world-wide popularity. The tennis world lost many of its best in that titanic struggle. The passing of so many from its ranks left gaps that will be hard to fill. The gallant death of Anthony F. Wilding in Flan- ders cost the game one of its greatest players and finest men. I had not the pleasure of knowing Wilding personally yet I, like all the tennis world, felt a sense of keen personal loss at his heroic passing. Wilding was a man whose sterling quali- ties gave even more to the game than his play, and tennis is better for his all too brief career. . America lost some of its finest manhood in the War, and tennis paid its toll. No player was a more likeable personality nor popular figure among the rising stars than John Plaffman, the young Harvard man who gave his life in Flanders fields. I cannot touch on the many heroes who made everlasting fame in a bigger game than that which they loved THE GROWTH OF THE MODERN GAME 111 so well. Time is too short. It is sufficient to know that the tennis players of the world dropped their sport at the call of War, and played as well with death as ever they did on the tennis court. The War is over, please God never to return, and the men are back from their marvellous task. The game of War is done, the games of Peace are again being played. Tennis suffered the world over from war's blight, but everywhere the game sprang up in renewed life at the close of hostilities. The sea- son of 19 19 was one of reconstruction after the devastation. New figures were standing in promi- nence where old stars were accustomed to be seen. The question on the lips of all the tennis players was whether the stars of pre-War days would return to their former greatness. The Championship of the World for 19 19 at Wimbledon was anxiously awaited. Who would stand forth as the shining light of that meeting? Gerald Patterson, the "Australian Hurricane," as the press called him, came through a notable field and successfully challenged Norman Brookes for the title. Gobert and Kingscote fell before him, and the press hailed him as a player of transcendent powers. The Australian team of Brookes, Patterson, R. V. Thomas, and Randolph Lycett journeyed home to the Antipodes by way of America to compete in the American Championship. Meanwhile R. N. Williams, W. M. Johnston, and Maurice E. M'Loughlin were demobilized, and were again on 112 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS the courts. The American Championships assumed an importance equal to that of the Wimbledon event. The Australian team of Brookes and Patterson successfully challenged the American title-holders in doubles, Vincent Richards and myself, after de- feating the best teams in America, including W. M. Johnston and C. J. Griffin, the former champions. Speculation was rife as to Patterson's ability to tri- umph in the Singles Championship,- and public inter- est ran high. The Singles Championship proved a notable tri- umph for W. M. Johnston, who won a decisive, clear-cut, and deserved victory from a field never equalled in the history of tennis. Johnston defeated Patterson in a marvellous 5-set struggle, while Brookes lost to me in four sets. M'Loughlin went down to Williams in a match that showed the fam- ous comet but a faint shadow of his former self. Williams was defeated in sequence sets by me. The final round found Johnston in miraculous form and complete master of the match from start to finish, and he defeated me in three sequence sets. Immediately following the championship, the Australian-American team match took place. In this Brookes went down to defeat before Johnston in four close sets, while I succeeded in scoring an- other point by nosing out Patterson by the same score. Thus 19 19 gave Johnston a clear claim to the title of the World's Premier Tennis Player. PLATE XI THE BACKHAND HALF VOLLEY Notice the ball about to strike the ground and the racquet traveling to meet it at the moment of its contact with the ground. The whole body- movement is forward. The body is at right angles to the net. The wrist locked and the ball blocked back with little follow through. The eyes are watching the ball meet the face of the racquet. THE GROWTH OF THE MODERN GAME 113 The whole season saw marked increase in tennis in- terest throughout the entire world. I have gone into more detail concerning the sea- son of 19 19 than I otherwise would, to attempt to show the revival of the tennis game in the public interest, and why it is so. The evolution of the tennis game is a natural logical one. There is a definite cycle of events that can be traced. The picture is clearest in America as the steps of advancements are more definitely defined. It is from America that I am going to analyse the growth of modern tennis. The old saying, "Three generations from shirt sleeves to shirt sleeves," may well be parodied to "Three decades from ground strokes to ground strokes." The game of tennis is one great circle that never quite closes. Progress will not allow a complete return to the old style. Yet the style, without the method of thirty years ago, is coming back in vogue. It is a polished, decorated version of the old type game. It is expanded and developed. History tells us that the civilization of the old Greeks and Romans held many so-called modern luxuries, but not the methods of acquiring them we have to-day. Just so with tennis ; for the ground- stroke game was the style of the past, just as it will be the style of the future; but the modern method of making ground strokes is a very different thing , from the one used by the old-time stars. We are on the brink of the upheaval. The next few years will show results in the tennis game that 114* THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS were not thought of before the War. Tennis is becoming an organized sport, with skilled manage- ment. Modern methods, where efficiency is the watchword, is the new idea in tennis development. Tennis is on the verge of the greatest increase in its history. Never before has tennis of all types been so universally played, nor by such great multi- tudes. Its drawing power is phenomenal, hundreds of thousands of people witnessing matches the world over, and played during the season of 1920. There are more players of fame now before the public than at any previous time since tennis became established. The standard of play of the masses and quality of game of the stars have risen tremend- ously in the last decade. No less an authority than Norman E. Brookes, whose active playing days cover a period of twenty years, told me during the American Championships last year at Forest Hills, that in his opinion the game in America had ad- vanced fully "15" in ten years. He stated that he believed the leading players of to-day were the supe- rior of the Larneds, Dohertys, and Pirns of the past. The most remarkable advance has been along the lines of junior play: the development of a large group of boys ranging in age from thirteen to eighteen, who will in time replace the Johnstons, Williams, and M'Loughlins of to-day. American tennis has passed through a series of revolutionary stages that have changed the complex of the game. English tennis has merely followed its natural development, unaffected by external in- THE GROWTH OF THE MODERN GAME 115 fluences or internal upheaval, so that the game to- day is a refined product of the game of twenty years ago. Refined but not vitalized. The World War alone placed its blight on the English game, and changed the even tenor of its way. Naturally the War had only a devastating effect. No good sprang from it. It is to the everlasting credit of the French and English that during those horrible four years of privation, suffering, and death the sports of the nations lived. The true type of English tennis, from which American tennis has sprung, was the base-line driv- ing game. It is still the same. Well-executed drives, hit leisurely and gracefully from the base- line, appealed to the temperament of the English people. They developed this style to a perfection well-nigh invincible to cope with from the same posi- tion. The English gave the tennis world its tradi- tions, its Dohertys and its Smiths. Tennis development, just as tennis psychology, is largely a matter of geographical distribution. This is so well recognized now in America that the coun- try is divided in various geographic districts by the national association, and sectional associations carry on the development of their locality under the super- vision of the national body. Naturally new countries, with different customs, would not develop along the same lines as England. America, Australia, and South Africa took the Eng- lish style, and began their tennis career on the base- line game. Each of these has since had a distinct 116 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS yet similar growth — a variance to the original style. American tennis followed the English base-line style through a period that developed Dr. Dwight, R. D. Sears, Henry Slocum, and other stars. Tennis, during this time, was gaining a firm hold among the boys and young men who found the deep-driving game devoid of the excitement they desired. Ameri- cans always enjoy experiments, so the rising players tried coming to the net at any reasonable opening. Gradually this plan became popular, until Dwight Davis and Holcombe Ward surprised the tennis world with their new service, now the American twist, and used it as an opening gun in a net attack. This new system gave us besides Davis and Ward, the Wrenn brothers, George and Robert, Malcolm Whitman, M. G. Chace, and finally Beals C. Wright. The base-line game had its firm adherents who followed it loyally, and it reached its crest in the person of William A. Larned. Previous to this time, speed, cyclonic hitting and furious smashing were unknown, although rumours of some player named M'Loughlin combining these qualities were floating East from the Pacific Coast. Not much stock was taken in this phenomenon until 1908, when Maurice Evans M'Loughlin burst upon the tennis world with a flash of brilliancy that earned him his popular nickname, "The California Comet." M'Loughlin was the turning-point in American tennis. He made a lasting impression on the game that can never be erased. His personality gained THE GROWTH OF THE MODERN GAME 117 him a following and fame, both in America and England, that have seldom been equalled in the sporting world. M'Loughlin was the disciple of speed. Cyclonic, dynamic energy, embodied in a fiery-headed boy, transformed tennis to a game of brawn as well as brains. America went crazy over "Red Mac," and all the rising young players sought to emulate his game. No man has brought a more striking per- sonality, or more generous sportsmanship, into ten- nis than M'Loughlin. The game owes him a great personal debt; but this very personal charm that was his made many players strive to copy his style and methods, which unfortunately were not fundamen- tally of the best. M'Loughlin was a unique tennis player. His whole game was built up on service and overhead. His ground strokes were very faulty. By his personal popularity M'Loughlin dwarfed the importance of ground strokes, and unduly empha- sized the importance of service. M'Loughlin gave us speed, dash, and verve in our tennis. It remained for R. N. Williams and W. M. Johnston to restore the balance of the modern game by solving the riddle of the Californian's service. Brookes and Wilding led the way by first meeting the ball as it came off the ground. Yet neither of these two wizards of the court successfully handled M'Loughlin's service as did Williams and Johnston. M'Loughlin swept Brookes and Wilding into the discard on those memorable days in 19 14, when the dynamic game of the fiery-headed Californian 118 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS rose to heights it had never attained previously, and he defeated both men in the Davis Cup. Less than one month later Williams, playing as only Williams can, annihilated that mighty delivery and crushed M'Loughlin in the final of the National Championship. It was the beginning of the end for M'Loughlin, for once his attack was repulsed he had no sound defence to fall back on. Williams and then Johnston triumphed by the wonderful ground strokes that held back M'Lough- lin's attack. To-day we are still in the period of service and net attack, with the cycle closing toward the ground- stroke game. Yet the circle will never close, for the net game is the final word in attack, and only attack will succeed. The evolution means that the ground stroke is again established as the only modern de- fence against the net player. Modern tennis should be an attacking service, not necessarily epoch-making, as was M'Loughlin's, but powerfully offensive, with the main portion of the play from the base-line in sparring for openings to advance to the net. Once the opening is made the advance should follow quickly, and the point ended by a decisive kill. That is the modern Ameri- can game. It is the game of Australia as typified by Patterson schooled under the Brookes tutelage. It is the game of France, played by Gobert, Laurentz, and Brugnon. It has spread to South Africa, and is used by Winslow, Norton, and Raymond. Japan sees its possibilities, and Kumagae and Shimidzu are THE GROWTH OF THE MODERN GAME 119 even now learning the net attack to combine with the base-line game. England alone remains obstinate in her loyalty to her old standby, and even there signs of the joint attack are found in the game of Kingscote. Tennis has spread so rapidly that the old idea of class and class game has passed away with so many other ancient, yet snobbish, traditions. Tennis is universally played. The need of proper develop- ment of the game became so great in America that the American Lawn Tennis Association organized, in 19 17, a system of developing the boys under eighteen years of age all over the United States. The fundamental idea in the system, which had its origin in the able brain of Julian S. Myrick, President of the United States Lawn Tennis Asso- ciation, was to arouse and sustain interest in the various sections by dealing with local conditions. This was successfully done through a system of local open tournaments, that qualified boys to a sectional championship. These sectional championships in turn qualified the winners for the National Junior Championship, which is held annually in conjunction with the men's event at Forest Hills. The success of the system has been stupendous. The growth of tennis in certain localities has been phenomenal. In Philadelphia alone over 500 boys compete in sanctioned play annually, while the city ranking for 19 19 contained the names of 88 boys under eighteen, and 30 under fifteen, all of whom had competed in at least three sanctioned events. 120 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS The school leagues of the city hold a schedule of 726 individual matches a year. The success of the Philadelphia junior system is due to the many large clubs who give the use of their courts and the balls for an open tournament. Among these clubs^ are Germantown Cricket Club, Cynwyd Club, Philadel- phia Cricket, Overbrook Golf Club, Belfield Coun- try Club, Stenton A. C, Green Point Tennis Club, and at times Merion Cricket Club. The movement has been fostered and built up by the efforts of a small group of meri, the most important of whom is Paul W. Gibbons, President of the Philadelphia Tennis Association, together with Wm. H. Connell of Germantown, the late Hosmer W. Hanna of Stenton, whose untiring efforts aided greatly in ob- taining a real start, Dr. Chuton A. Strong, Presi- dent of the Interscholastic League, Albert L. Hos- kins, for years Vice-President of the U.S.L.T.A., and others. This plan brought great results. It de- veloped such players as Rodney M. Beck, H. F. JDomkin, G. B. Piingst, Carl Fischer, the most prom- ising boy in the city, who has graduated from the junior age limit, and Charles Watson (third), who, in 1920, is the Philadelphia Junior Champion, and one of the most remarkable players for a boy of six- teen I have ever seen. New York City was fortunate m having F. B. Alexander, the famous Internationalist, to handle the junior tennis there. He, together with Julian S. Myrick, and several other men, built up a series of tournaments around New York that produced THE GROWTH OF THE MODERN GAME 121 some remarkable young players. It is largely due to the junior system that Vincent Richards has become the marvellous player that he is, at such an early age. Second only to Richards, and but a shade behind, are Harold Taylor and Cecil Donaldson, who have just passed out of the junior age limit. Charles Wood, the Indoor Boys Champion, is a remarkable youngster. In New England, particularly in Providence, through the efforts of J. D. E. Jones, junior tennis is rapidly assuming an important place, and many young stars v/ho will be heard of in the future are coming to the fore. By a strange coincidence the list is headed by the two sons of Jones. They seem to have inherited their father's ability. Arnold W. Jones, the National Boy Champion, is a player of marked ability, with a fine all-around game. Following closely on his heels come J. D. E. Jones, Jr., and Wm. W. Ingraham. From the South one finds John E. Howard. Around Chicago a group of men, led by Samuel Hardy, captain of the 1920 Davis Cup team, and assisted by R. T. Van Arsdale, built up a magnificent system of tournaments and coaching. Hardy left Chicago and came to New York in 19 19; but the work which he so ably organ- ized will continue under the supervision of the West- ern Association. The leading juniors developed in Chicago were Lucian Williams and the Weber brothers, James and Jerry. From the Pacific Coast, the pioneer in junior de- velopment, wonderful boys are continually coming 122 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS East. A boy's tennis game matures early in Cali- fornia. M'Loughlin was about eighteen when he first came East ; Johnston less than twenty-one when he won the national title the first time; Mqrvin Griffin and Morgan Fottrell are in 1920 the lead- ing youngsters in California. The success of the Californians is due largely to the efforts of Dr. Sumner Hardy, brother of Samuel Hardy, and one of the most remarkable figures in the tennis world. Dr. Hardy practically carries the California Association single handed. He is a big factor in American tennis success. From up in Washington State, a fine young player, Marshall Allen, has come to the fore. Charles S. Garland, the Davis Cup star, is a former Junior Champion of America, and a product of the junior system in Pittsburg, which is so ably handled by his father, Charles Garland. Other young stars developing include George Moreland and Leonard Reed. Most of the foregoing is irrelevant, I suppose, but I have gone into detail because I want to prove that America has gone into the matter of junior develop- ments, carefully, systematically, and has produced results. It has been proved conclusively that it is in the schools that the most favourable progress could be made. Once tennis is placed on the basis of im- portance it deserves, the boys will take, it up. At present there is a tendency to discount tennis and golf in school. This is a big mistake, as these two THE GROWTH OF THE MODERN GAME 123 games are the only ones that a man can play regu- larly after he leaves college and enters into busi- ness. The school can keep a sport alive. It is schools that kept cricket alive in England, and lack of scholastic support that killed it in America. The future of tennis in England, France, Australia, Japan, etc., rests in the hands of the boys. If the game is to grow, tennis must be encouraged among the youngsters and played in the schools. England is faced with a serious problem. Eton and Harrow, the two big schools, are firm set against tennis. The other institutions naturally fol- low in the lead of these famous schools. The younger generation is growing up with little or no knowledge of tennis. One thing that forcibly bore in on my mind, during my trip in 1920, was the com- plete absence of boys of all ages at the various tour- naments. In America youngsters from ten years of age up swarm all over the grounds at big tennis events. I saw very few of either at Queen's Club, Wimbledon, Eastbourne, or Edgbaston where I played. The boys do not understand tennis in Eng- land, and naturally do not care to play it. The English Lawn Tennis Association is very desirous of building up tennis in the schools; but so far has not yet succeeded in breaking down the old prejudice. It is really a question of life or death with English tennis at this time. Major A. R. F. Kingscote, the youngest of the leading players in England, is older than any man in the American First ten, with the single exception of Walter T. 124 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS Hayes. J. C. Parke has stated definitely that 1920 marked his retirement from the game. He is just under forty. Young players must be found to re- place the waning stars. The danger is not imme- diate, for all the players who proved so good in 1920 seemed certain of several more years of first- class play; but what of the next ten years? The future development of tennis is dependent largely upon the type of court that will become the standard. All big fixtures to-day are played on grass wherever possible. There is little question but that the grass game is the best. In the first place, it is the old-established custom, and should be maintained if possible. Secondly, the game is more skilful and more interesting on turf. Thirdly, grass is far easier on the eyes and feet of the players than any other surface. There are drawbacks to grass courts. Grass cannot grow in all climates. The grass season opens late and closes early. The expense of upkeep is very great, and skilled groundsmen are required at all clubs that have grass courts. The hard court of clay or dirt, cinder, en-tout-cas, or asphalt allows more continuous play and uniform conditions in more kinds of weather. The bound is truer and higher, but the light and surface are harder on the player. The balls wear light very rapidly, while racquets wear through quite soon. The advantages are a much longer season on hard courts, with less chance of weather interrupting im- THE GROWTH OF THE MODERN GAME 125 portant meetings. The courts reauire far less care in upkeep than grass. What has been the actual tendency in the last decade? In America the hard courts erected have been approximately nine to one grass. America is rapidly become a hard-court country. France is entirely on a hard-court basis; there are no grass courts at all. Play in South Africa is entirely on hard courts. Australia and the British Isles have successfully repelled the hard-court invasion thus far, although during the past two years the number of hard courts put up in England has exceeded grass. The en-tout-cas court of peculiar red surface is the most popular composition in England and the Continent. There seems little doubt but that the hard court is the coming surface in the next decade. Grass will continue to be used for the most important events, but the great majority of the tennis played, ex- clusive of the championships, will be on hard courts. The result on the game will be one of increasing the value of the ground stroke and partially cutting down the net attack, since the surface of a hard court is slippery and tends to make it hard to reach the net to volley. Thus the natural attack will become a drive and not a volley. Hard-court play speeds up the ground strokes, and makes the game more orthodox. The installation of hard courts universally should spread tennis rapidly, since it will afford more chance 126 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS to play over a longer period. The growth of public courts in the parks and the municipal play grounds in America has been a big factor in the spread of the game's popularity. Formerly a man or boy had to belong to a club in order to have an opportunity to play tennis. Now all he needs is a racquet and balls, and he may play on a public court in his own city. This movement will spread, not only in America but throughout the world. England and France have some public courts; but their systems are not quite as well organized as the American. The branch of tennis which England and France foster, and in which America is woefully lax, is the indoor game. Unfortunately the majority of the courts abroad have wood surfaces, true but light- ning fast. The perfect indoor court should retain its true bound, but slow up the skid of the ball. The most successful surface I have ever played upon is battleship linoleum — the heavy covering used on men-of-war. This gives a true, slightly retarded bound, not unlike a very fast grass court. Indoor play in America is sadly crippled by reason of no adequate facilities for play. The so-called National Indoor Championship is held at the Seventh Regiment Armoury in New York City on a wood floor, with such frightful lighting that it is impossible to play real tennis. The two covered courts at Longwood Club, Boston, are very fine, well lighted, with plenty of space. There is a magnificent court at Providence, and another at Buffalo. Utica boasts of another, while there are several fine courts, THE GROWTH OF THE MODERN GAME 127 privately owned, on Long Island. New York City uses the big armouries for indoor play; but the sur- face and light in these are not fit for real tennis. The Brooklyn Heights Casino has the only adequate court in the Metropolitan district. Philadelphia and Chicago, cities of enormous populations and great tennis interest, have no courts or facilities for indoor play. This condition must be rectified in America if we wish to keep our suprem- acy in the tennis v/orld. The French players are re- markable on wood. Gobert is said to be the supe- rior of any player in the world, when playing under good conditions indoors. The game of tennis is worthy of having all types of play within reach of its devotees. Why should a player drop his sport in October because the weather is cold? Indoor play during the winter means an improvement from sea- son to season. Lack of it is practically stagnation or retrogression. The future will see a growth of hard-court play the world over. Grass must fight to hold its posi- tion. Indoor play will come more and more into vogue. CHAPTER XI THE PROBABLE FUTURE OF THE GAME WHAT will be the outcome of the world-wide boom in tennis? Will the game change materially in the coming years? Time, alone, can answer; but with that rashness that seizes one when the opportunity to prophesy arrives and no one is at hand to cry "Hold, hold," I dare to submit my views on the coming years in international tennis. I do not look to see a material change in the play- ing rules. A revival of the footfault fiend, who de- sires to handicap the server, is international in char- acter and, like the poor, "always with us." The International Federation has practically adopted a footfault rule for 192 1 that prohibits the server lifting one foot unless replaced behind the base-line. It is believed this will do away with the terrific services. The only effect I can see from it is to move the server back a few inches, or possibly a foot, while he delivers the same service and follows in with a little more speed of foot. It will not change the game at all. Sir Oliver Lodge, the eminent scientist, has joined the advocates of but one service per point. This seems so radical and in all so use- less, since it entirely kills service as other than a 128 PLATE XII rHE BACKHAND RUNXING VOLLEY Notice the right leg advanced and the locked wrist. The body is side- ways to the net. These two pictures [Plates XI and XII], taken dur- ing the English championships in actual competition, are remarkable action pictures of high-class tennis. THE PROBABLE FUTURE OF THE GAME 129 mere formality, and puts it back where it was twenty-five years ago, that I doubt if even the weight of Sir Oliver Lodge's eminent opinion can put it over. To allow one service is to hand the game more fully into the receiver's hands than it now rests in the server's. The playing rules are adequate in every way, and the perfect accord with which representatives of the various countries meet and play, happily, success- fully, and what is more important, annually, is suffi- cient endorsement of the fundamental principles. The few slight variations of the different countries are easily learned and work no hardships on visiting players. Why change a known successful quantity for an unknown? It seldom pays. The style of play is now approaching a type which I believe will prove to have a long life. To-day we are beginning to combine the various styles in one man. The champion of the future will necessarily need more equipment than the champion of to-day. The present shows us the forehand driving of John- ston, the service of Murray, the volleying of Rich- ards, the chop of Wallace F. Johnson, the smash of Patterson, the half volley of Williams, and the back hand of Pell. The future will find the greatest players combining much of these games. It can be done if the player will study. I believe that every leading player in the world in 1950 will have a drive and a chop, fore- and backhand from the base-line. He will use at least two styles of service, since one will not suffice against the stroke of that period. He 130 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS will be a volleyer who can safely advance to the net, yet his attack will be based on a ground game.' He must smash well. In short, I believe that the key to future tennis success lies in variety of stroke. The day of the one-stroke player is passing. Each year sees the versatile game striding forward by leaps and bounds. The future champion of the world must be a man of keen intellect, since psychology is assuming the importance that is its due. He must train earnestly, carefully, and consistently. The day of playing suc- cessful tennis and staying up till daybreak is over. The game is too fast and too severe for that. As competition increases the price of success goes up; but its worth increases in a greater ratio, for the man who triumphs in the World's Championship in 1950 will survive a field of stars beyond our wildest dreams in 1920. What of the various countries? America should retain her place at or near the top, for the boys we are now developing should not only make great play- ers themselves, but should carry on the work of training the coming generations. England has but to interest her youth in the game to hold her place with the leaders. I believe it will be done. I look to see great advances made in tennis among the boys in England in the next few years. I believe the game will change to conform more to the modern net attack. England will never be the advanced tennis-playing country that her colonies are, for her whole atmosphere is one of THE PROBABLE FUTURE OF THE GAME 131 conservatism in sport. Still her game will change. Already a slight modification is at work. The next decade will see a big change coming over the style of English tennis. The wonderful sporting abilities of the Englishman, his ability to produce his best when seemingly down and out mean that, no matter how low the ebb to which tennis might fall, the in- herent abilities of the English athlete would always bring it up. I sound pessimistic about the immedi- ate future. I am hot, provided English boyhood is interested in the game. Japan is the country of the future. There is no more remarkable race of students on the globe than the Japanese. They like tennis, and are coming with increasing numbers to our tournaments. They prove themselves sterling sportsmen and remarkable players. I look to see Japan a power in tennis in the next twenty-five years. France, with her brilliant temperamental unstable people, will always provide interesting players and charming opponents. I do not look to see France materially change her present position — which is one of extreme honour, of great friendliness, and keen competition. Her game will not greatly rise, nor will she lose in any way the prestige that is hers. It will be many long years before the players of those enemy countries, who plunged the world into the horrible baptism of blood from which we have only just emerged, will ever be met by the players of the Allies. Personally, I trust I may not see their 138 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS re-entry into the game. Not from the question of the individuals, but from the feeling which will not down. There is no need to deal at this time with the future of Germany and Austria. Australasia and South Africa, the famous colonies of the British Empire, should be on the edge of a great tennis wave. I look to see great players rise in Australasia to refill the gaps left by the passing of Wilding and the retirement of Brookes. It takes great players to fill such gaps ; but great players are bred from the traditions of the former masters. The future should see America and Australia fight- ing for supremacy in the tennis world, with England and France close on their heels to jump in the lead at the first faltering. It is only a matter of time before the last differ- ences between the International Federation and the America Association are patched up. The funda- mental desires of each, to spread the growth of tennis, are the same. Sooner or later the ban will fall, and a trusty International Federation, world- wide in scope, will follow. I look to see the Davis Cup matches gain in importance and public interest as each year goes by. The growth of the public interest in the game is seen at every hand. Wimbledon must seek new quarters. The new grounds of the All England Club will provide accommodation for 20,000 to witness the championships. This enormous stadium is the result of public pressure, owing to the crowd that could not be accommodated at the old grounds. THE PROBABLE FUTURE OF THE GAME 133 Westside Club, Forest Hills, where the American Championship is held, is planning accommodation for 25,000, provided that they are awarded the championship for a long term of years. Davis Cup matches are now drawing from 10,000 to 15,000 where the accommodation is available. What will the future hold? I believe that 1950 will find the game of tennis on a plane undreamed of to-day. Tennis is still in its infancy. May I have the pleasure to help in rocking the cradle. My task is completed. I have delved into the past, analysed the present, and prophesied the fu- ture, with a complete disregard of conventions and traditions. The old order changeth, and I trust that my book may aid slightly in turning the tennis thought in the direction of organized developments. The day of self is past. The day of co-operation is dawning. It is seen in the junior tennis, the municipal tennis, and the spirit of international brotherhood in the game. Assistance is necessary to success in any venture. My book has been made possible only by the aid afforded me by several of my companions on the Davis Cup team trip. The task of arranging the material in coherent order and proper style is one of the most important points. I owe a debt of gratitude to Mrs. Samuel Hardy, wife of our cap- tain, for her never-failing interest and keen judg- ment in the matter of style. 134 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS Mr. Hardy, with his great knowledge of the game of tennis, as player, official, and organizer, freely gave of his store of experience, and to him I owe much that is interesting in the tactics of the game. R. N. Williams, my team-mate, was always a willing critic and generous listener, and his playing abilities and decided ideas on the game gave much material that found its way into these pages. I wish to express my gratitude for his able assistance. Charles S. Garland, my doubles partner and close friend, gave never-wavering faith and a willing ear to my ravings over strokes, tactics, and theories, while his orthodox views on tennis acted as a stop on my rather Bolshevik ideas. To all these people I express my thanks for their part in any success I may attain with this book. I have a firm belief in the future of tennis. I recom- mend it to all. It gives firm friends, a healthy body, a keen mind, and a clean sport. It calls forth the best that is in you, and repays you in its own coin. PART IV: SOME SIDELIGHTS ON FAMOUS PLAYERS PART IV: SOME SIDELIGHTS ON FAMOUS PLAYERS INTRODUCTORY PT. BARNUM once said: "You can fool 4 some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can't fool all of the people all of the time." P. T. was an able judge of the public, and it is just this inability to fool all of the people all of the time that accounts for the sudden disappearance from the public eye of some 1 one who only fooled all of the people for a little while. That person was a sham, a bluff, a gamester. He, or she, as the case may be, had no personality. Personality needs no disguise with which to fool the people. It is not hidden in a long-hair eccentric being. That type is merely one of those who are "born every minute," as the saying goes. Per- sonality is a dynamic, compelling force. It is a positive thing that will not be obliterated. Personality is a sexless thing. It transcends sex. Theodore Roosevelt was a compelling personality, and his force and ability were recognized by his friends and enemies alike while the public, the masses, adored him without knowing why. Sarah Bernhardt, Eleanor Duse, and Mary Garden carry *S7 138 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS with them a force far more potent in its appeal to the public than their mere feminine charm. They hold their public by personality. It is not trickery, but art, plus this intangible force. The great figures in the tennis world that have held their public in their hands, all have been men of marked personality. Not all great tennis players have personality. Few of the many stars of the game can lay claim to it justly. The most powerful personality in the tennis world during my time is Norman E. Brookes, with his peculiar sphinx-like repression, mysterious, quiet, and ominous calm. Brookes repels many by his peculiar personality. He never was the popular hero that other men, notably M'Loughlin and Wilding, have been. Yet Brookes always held a gallery enthralled, not only by the sheer wizardry of his play, but by the power of his magnetic force. Maurice E. M'Loughlin is the most remarkable example of a wonderful dynamic personality, liter- ally carrying a public off its feet. America and England fell before the dazzling smile and vibrant force of the red-haired Californian. His whole game glittered in its radiance. His was a triumph of a popular hero. Anthony F. Wilding, quiet, charming, and mag- netic, carried his public away with him by his dynamic game. It was not the whirlwind flash of the Comet M'Loughlin that swept crowds off their feet, it was more the power of repression that com- pelled. INTRODUCTORY 139 I know no other tennis players that sweep their public away with them to quite the same degree as these three men I have mentioned. R. L. Murray has much of M'Loughlin's fire, but not the spon- taneity that won the hearts of the crowd. Tennis needs big personalities to give the public that glow of personal interest that helps to keep the game alive. A great personality is the property of the public. It is the price he must pay for his gift. It is the personal equation, the star, who appeals to the public's imagination. I do not think it is the star who keeps the game alive. It is that great class of players who play at clubs the world over, who can never rise above the dead level of mediocrity, the mass of tennis en- thusiasts who play with dead racquets and old balls, and who attend all big events to witness the giants of the court, in short, "The Dubs" (with a capital D), who make tennis what it is, and to whom tennis owes its life, since they are its support and out from them have come our champions. Champions are not born. They are made. They emerge from a long, hard school of defeat, dis- encouragement, and mediocrity, not because they are born tennis players, but because they are endowed with a force that transcends discouragement and cries "I will succeed." There must be something that carries them up from the mass. It is that something which appeals in some form to the public. The public may like it, or they may dislike it, but they recognize it. 140 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS It may be personality, dogged determination, or sheer genius of tennis, for all three succeed; but be it what it may, it brings out a famous player. The quality that turns out a great player, individualizes his game so that it bears a mark peculiar to himself. I hope to be able to call to mind the outstanding qualities of some of the leading tennis players of the world. Where to start, in a field so great, representing as it does America, the British Isles, Australia, France, Japan, South Africa, Rumania, Holland, and Greece, is not an easy task; but it is with a sense of pride and a knowledge that there is no game better fitted to end this section of my book, and no man more worthy to lead the great players of the world, that I turn to William M. Johnston, the champion of the United States of America, and my team-mate in the Davis Cup team of 1920. CHAPTER XII AMERICA WILLIAM M. JOHNSTON THE American champion is one of the really great orthodox players in the world. There is nothing eccentric, nothing freakish about his game. Johnston is a small man, short and light; but by perfect weight-control, footwork, and timing he hits with terrific speed. His service is a slice. Hit from the top of his reach Johnston gets power and twist on the ball with little effort. He has a wonderful forehand drive, of a top-spin variety. This shot is world famous, for never in the history of the game has so small a man hit with such terrific speed and accuracy. The racquet travels flat and then over the ball, with a peculiar wrist-snap just as the ball meets the racquet face. The shot travels deep and fast to the base- line. Johnston's backhand is a decided "drag" or chop., He hits it with the same face of the racquet as his forehand, and with very little change in grip. It is remarkably steady and accurate, and allows John- ston to follow to the net behind it. 141 142 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS Johnston's volleying is hard, deep, and usually very reliable. He crouches behind his racquet and volleys directly in to the flight of the ball, hitting down. His low volleys are made with a peculiar wrist-flick that gives the rise and speed. His over- head is accurate, reliable, but not startling in its power. Johnston's game has no real weakness, while his forehand and volleying are superlative. Johnston is a remarkable match player. He reaches his greatest game when behind. He is one of the hardest men to beat in the game owing to his utter lack of fear and the dogged determination with which he hangs on when seemingly beaten. He is quiet, modest, and a sterling sportsman. He gets a maximum result with a minimum effort. R. N. WILLIAMS R. N. Williams, American Champion 19 14 and 19 1 6, another of my Davis Cup team-mates, is a unique personality in the tennis world. Personally, I believe that Williams at his best is the greatest tennis player in the world, past or present. Un- fortunately, that best is seldom seen, and then not for a consistent performance. He is always danger- ous, and his range of variation is the greatest among any of the leading players. Williams' service is generally a fast slice, although he at times uses an American twist. He is erratic in his delivery, scoring many aces, but piling up enormous numbers of double-faults. His ground strokes are made off the rising bound of the ball. AMERICA 143 They are flat or slightly sliced. Never topped, But sometimes pulled. Williams' margin of safety is so small that unless his shot is perfectly hit it is useless. He hits hard at all times and makes tre- mendous numbers of earned points, yet his errors always exceed them, except when he strikes one of his "super" days. His volleying is very hard, crisp, and decisive, coupled with an occasional stop volley. His use of the half volley is unequalled in modern tennis. His overhead is severe and ordinarily reliable, al- though he will take serious slumps overhead. He is a past master of his own style strokes, but it is an unorthodox game that should not be copied by the average player. He is never willing to alter his game for safety's sake, and defeats himself in sheer defiance by hitting throughout a match when his strokes are not work- ing. He is greatly praised for this unwillingness to alter his game in defeat. Personally, I think he deserves condemnation rather than praise, for it seems recklessness rather than bravery to thus seek defeat that could easily be avoided. Williams takes tennis almost too lightly. Cheery, modest, and easy-going, he is very popular with; all galleries, as his personality deserves. He is a bril- liant ever-interesting light in any tennis gathering, and his game will always show sheer genius of exe- cution even while rousing irritation by his refusal to play safe. He would rather have one super-great iay and bad defeats, than no bad defeats without 144 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS his day of greatness. Who shall say he is not right? We may not now agree, but Williams may yet prove to us he is right and we are wrong. CHARLES S. GARLAND The last member of the Davis Cup team and youngest player of the Americans is Charles S. Garland, the Yale star. Garland is the perfect stylist, the orthodox model for ground strokes. He is an example of what stroke perfection can do. He uses a soft slice service, of no particular peculiarity, yet places it so well that he turns it into an attack. His forehand is hit with a full swing, flat racquet face, and a slight top spin. It is deadly accurate and of moderate speed. He can put the ball at will anywhere in the court off his forehand. His backhand is slightly sliced down the line and pulled flat across the court. It is not a point winner but is an excellent defence. His overhead is steady, reliable, and accurate, but lacks aggressiveness. His high volleying is fine, deep, and fast. His low vol- leying is weak and uncertain. He anticipates wonderfully, and covers a tremendous amount of court. His attack is rather obvious in that he sel- dom plays the unusual shot, yet his accuracy is so great that he frequently beats a man who guesses his shot yet can't reach it. N. E. Brookes stated he considered Garland one of the greatest ground-stroke players in the world. C. S. GARLAND AND R. N. WILLIAMS America W. M. JOHNSTON America IPbbb -mm e^ ^'" w ' ^522 W ' Wl\ ' ' '* ■Pm^' ^-^^ i Iw^^v t E^^pX -ill | BB I 1 1 1 A. G. GOBERT France W. A. LAURENTZ France PLATE XIII A. R. F. KINGSCOTE British Isles GERALD PATTERSON Australia T. M. MAVROGORDATO British Isles PLATE XIV AMERICA 145 This is true of his forehand, but his backhand lacks punch. His whole game needs speed and aggres- siveness. He is quiet, modest, and extremely popular. His perfect court manner and pleasant smile have made Garland a universal favourite in America and Eng- land. His game is the result of hard, conscientious work. There is no genius about it, and little natural talent. It is not an interesting game as it lacks brilliancy, yet it is very sound, and much better than it looks. VINCENT RICHARDS Vincent Richards, National Junior Champion of America and the most remarkable boy playing ten- nis, is a distinct personality. Richards, who is now only seventeen, won the Men's Doubles Champion- ship of America at the age of fifteen. Richards is a born tennis player and a great tennis genius. Richards' service is a fast slice that he follows to the net. It is speedy and very accurate. His ground strokes are both slice and drive, although the basis of his game is slice. He meets the ball on the rise and "spoons" it off his forehand. It is low, fast, but none too sure. His backhand shot is a fast twisting slice that is remarkably effective and very excellent as a defence. He is learning a flat drive. His volleying is the great feature of his game. He is the greatest natural volleyer I have ever seen. Low and high volleying, fore- and backhand is per- fect in execution. His half volleying is phenomenal. 146 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS His overhead is very severe for a boy, and carries great speed for so small a person, but it is inclined to be slightly erratic. He is tremendously fast on his feet, but it inclined to be lazy. Vincent Richards has the greatest natural apti- tude and equipment of any tennis player I have ever seen. Against it he has a temperament that is in- clined to carelessness and laziness. He tends to sulkiness, which he is rapidly outgrowing. He is a delightful personality on the court, with his slight figure, tremendous speed, and merry smile. He is a second "Gus" Touchard in looks and style. I hope to see him develop to be the greatest player the world has ever seen. He gives that promise. The matter rests in Richards' hands, as his worst enemy is his temperament. At his best he is to-day the equal of the top flight in the world. At his worst he is a child. His average is fine but not great. Travel, work, sincere effort, and a few years, should turn this astonishing boy into a marvellous player. R. L. MURRAY The new "California Comet," successor to M. E. M'Loughlin, is the usual sobriquet for R. L. Murray, now of Buffalo. Murray won the National Crown in 19 17-19 1 8. His service is of the same cyclonic character as M'Loughlin. Murray is left-handed. He hits a fast cannon-ball delivery of great speed and an AMERICA 147 American twist of extreme twist. His ground strokes are not good, and he rushes the net at every oppor- tunity. His forehand drive is very fast, excessively topped, and exceedingly erratic. His backhand is a "poke." His footwork is very poor on both shots. He volleys very well, shooting deep to the base-line and very accurately. His shoulder-high volleys are marvellous. His overhead is remarkable for its severity and accuracy. He seldom misses an over- head ball. Murray is a terrifically hard worker, and tires himself out very rapidly by prodigious effort. He is a hard fighter and a hard man to beat. He works at an enormous pace throughout the match. He is large, spare, rangy, with dynamic energy, and a wonderful personality that holds the gallery. His smile is famous, while his sense of humour never deserts him. A sportsman to his finger-tips, there is no more popular figure in American tennis than Murray. His is not a great game. It is a case of a great athlete making a second-class game first class, by sheer power of personality and fighting ability. He is really a second M'Loughlin in his game, his speed, and his personal charm. WATSON M. WASHBURN In contrast to Murray, Watson M. Washburn plays a cool, never-hurried, never-flurried game that is unique in American tennis. There is little that is noteworthy of Washburn's 148 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS game. His service is a well-placed slice. His ground strokes are a peculiar "wrist-slap," almost a slice. His volleying fair, his overhead steady but not re- markable. Just a good game, well rounded but not unique. Why is Washburn great? Because, behind the big round glasses that are the main feature of Washburn on the tennis court, is a brain of the first water, directing and developing that all-round game. There is no more brilliant student of men in games than Washburn, and his persistence of at- tack is second only to Brookes'. Washburn, too, is a popular player, but not in the same sense as Murray. Murray appeals to the imagination of the crowd, Washburn to its academic instincts. Washburn is a strategist, working out his match with mathematical exactness, and always checking up his men as he goes along. There is no tennis player whose psychology I admire more than Washburn's. He is never beaten until the last point is played, and he is always dan- gerous, no matter how great a lead you hold over him. Another case of the second-class game being made first class, but this time it is done by mental bril- liancy. WALLACE F. JOHNSON tlere is another case of a second-class game being used in a first-class manner, getting first-class results through the direction of a first-class tennis brain. Johnson is not the brilliant, analytical mind of AMERICA 149 Washburn, but for pure tennis genius Johnson ranks nearly the equal of Brookes. Johnson is a one-stroke player. He uses a peculiar slice shot hit from the wrist. He uses it in service, ground strokes, volleying, and lobbing. It is a true one-stroke game, yet by sheer audacity of enterprise and wonderful speed of foot Wallace Johnson has for years been one of the leading players of America. There are many other great players I would like to analyse, but space forbids. Among our leaders are Roland Roberts, John Strachan, C. J. Griffin, Willis E. Davis, and Robert Kinsey in California; Walter T. Hayes, Ralph Burdock, and Heath By- ford in the Middle West ; Howard Voshell, Harold Throckmorton, Conrad B. Doyle, Craig Biddle, Richard Harte, Colket Coner, Nathaniel W. Niles, H. C. Johnson, Dean Mathey, and many others of equal fame in the East. CHAPTER XIII BRITISH ISLES J. C. PARKE THERE is no name in tennis history of the past decade more famous than that of J. C. Parke. In twelve months, during 19 12 and 19 13, he defeated Brookes, Wilding, and M'Loughlin — a notable record; and now in 1920, after his wonder- ful work in the World War, he returns to tennis and scores a decisive victory over W. M. Johnston. Parke is essentially a base-line player. His service is soft, flat, but well placed. His ground strokes are hit with an almost flat racquet face and a peculiar short swing. He uses a pronounced snap of the wrist. He slices his straight backhand shot, but pulls his drive 'cross court. It is Parke's famous running drive down the line that is the outstanding feature of his game. Parke was a ten-second hundred-yard man in college, and still retains his remarkable speed of foot. He hits his drive while running at top speed and translates his weight to the ball. It shoots low and fast down the line. It is a marvellous stroke. Parke's volleying is steady and well placed but not decisive. His overhead is reliable and accurate, 150 BRITISH ISLES 151 but lacks "punch." The great factor of Parke's game is his uncanny ability to produce his greatest game under the greatest stress. I consider him one of the finest match players in the world. His tacti- cal knowledge and brainy attack are all the more dangerous, because he has phenomenal power of defence and fighting qualities of the highest order. There is no finer sportsman in tennis than Parke. Generous, quiet, and modest, Parke is deservedly a popular figure with the tennis world. A. R. F. KINGSCOTE The most recent star to reach the heights of fame in English tennis is Major A. R. F. Kingscote. Kingscote has played good tennis for some years; but it was only in 19 19, following his excellent work in the War, that he showed his true worth. He defeated Gobert in sequence sets in the Davis Cup tie at Deauville, and followed by defeating Anderson in Australia and carrying Patterson to a hard match. Since then he has steadily improved and this season found him the leading figure of the British team. Kingscote played much of his early tennis with R. N. Williams in Switzerland during 19 10 and 19 1 1. The effect of this training is easily seen on his game to-day for, without Williams' dash and ex- treme brilliancy, their strokes are excuted in very much the same style. Kingscote's service is a fast slice, well placed and cleverly disguised. It carries a great deal of pace 152 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS and twist. His ground strokes are hit off the rising bound of the ball, with a flat raquet face or a slight slice. His wonderful speed of foot offsets his lack of height, and he hits either side with equal facility. There are no gaps in Kingscote's game. It is per- fectly rounded. His favourite forehand shot is 'cross court, yet he can hit equally well down the line. His backhand is steady, very accurate and deceptive, but rather lacks speed. His volleying is remarkable for his court covering and angles, but is not the decisive win of Williams or Johnston. He is the best volleyer in the British Isles. His over- head is realiable and accurate for so short a man, but at times is prone to lack speed. Kingscote is a sound tactician without the stra- tegic brilliance of Parke. He is a fine match player and dogged fighter. Witness his 5-set battle with- me in the Championships, after being match point down in the fourth set, and his 5-set struggle with Johnston in the Davis Cup. It is a slight lack of decisiveness all round that keeps Kingscote just a shade below the first flight. He is a very fine player, who may easily become a top-notch man. His pleas- ant, modest manner and generous sportsmanship make him an ideal opponent, and endear him to the gallery. H. ROPER BARRETT One of the real tennis tacticians, a man who is to-day a veteran of many a notable encounter, yet still dangerous at all times, is H. Roper Barrett. BRITISH ISLES 153 A member of every Davis Cup team since the matches were inaugurated, a doubles player of the highest strategy, Roper Barrett needs no introduc- tion or analysis. His game is soft. His service looks a joke. In reality it is hard to hit, for Barrett pushes it to the most unexpected places. His ground strokes, soft, short, and low, are ideal doubles shots. He angles off the ball with a short shove in the direc- tion. He can drive hard when pressed, but prefers to use the slow poke. His volleying is the acme of finesse. He angles soft to the side-lines, stop volleys the hardest drives successfully. He picks openings with an unerring eye. His overhead lacks "punch," but is steady and reliable. Barrett is a clever mixer of shots. He is playing the unexpected shot to the unexpected place. His sense of anticipation is remarkable, and he retrieves the most unusual shots. It is his great tennis tactics that make him noteworthy. His game is round but not wonderful. THE LOWES, A. H. AND F. G. The famous brothers, called indiscriminately the Lowes, are two of the best base-line players in the British Isles. Both men play almost identical styles, and at a distance are very hard to tell apart. Gordon Lowe uses a slice service, while Arthur serves with a reverse spin. Neither man has a dangerous delivery. Both are adequate and hard to win earned points from. 154 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS The ground strokes of the Lowes are very ortho- dox. Full swing, top spin drives fore- and back- hand, straight or 'cross court, are hit with equal facility. The Lowes volley defensively and only come in to the let when pulled in by a short shot. Their overhead work is average. Their games are not startling. There is nothing to require much comment. Both men are excellent tennis players of the true English school: fine base- line drivers, but subject to defeat by any aggressive volleyer. It is a lack of aggressiveness that holds both men down, for they are excellent court coverers, fine racquet wielders, but do not rise to real heights. The Lowes could easily defeat any player who was slightly off his game, as they are very steady and make few mistakes. Neither would defeat a first- class player at his best. T. M. MAVROGORDATO One of the most consistent winners in English ten- nis for a span of years is a little man with a big name, who is universally and popularly known as "Mavro." "Mavro" added another notable victory in 1920, when he defeated R. N. Williams in the last eight in the World Championships. "Mavro" has always been a fine player, but he has never quite scaled the top flight. His game is steadiness personified. He shoves his service in the court at the end of a prodigious swing BRITISH ISLES 155 that ends in a poke. It goes where he wishes it. His ground strokes are fine, in splendid form, very accurate and remarkably fast for so little effort. Mavro is not large enough to hit hard, but owing to his remarkable footwork he covers a very large territory in a remarkably short space of time. His racquet work is a delight to a student of orthodox form. His volleying is accurate, steady, well placed but defensive. He has no speed or punch to his volley. His overhead is steady to the point of being unique. He is so small that it seems as if anyone could lob over his head, but his speed of foot is so great that he invariably gets his racquet on it and puts it back deep. Mavro turns defence into attack by putting the ball back in play so often that his opponent gets tired hitting it and takes unnecessary chances. His accuracy is so great that it makes up for his lack of speed. His judgment is sound but not brilliant. He is a hard-working, conscientious player who de- serves his success. There are many other players who are interesting studies. The two Australians, now living in Eng- land, and to all intents and purposes Englishmen, Randolph Lycett and F. M. B. Fisher, are distinct and interesting types of players. C. P. Dixon, Stanley Doust, M. J. G. Ritchie, Max Woosnam, the rising young star, P. M. Davson, A. E. Beamish, W. C. Crawley, and scores of other excellent play- ers, will carry the burden of English tennis success^ 156 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS fully for some years. Yet new blood must be found to infuse energy into the game. Speed is a neces- sity in English tennis if the modern game is to reach its greatst height in the British Isles. Youth must be seen soon, if the game in the next ten years is to be kept at its present level. Parke, Mavro, Ritchie, Dixon, Barrett, etc., cannot go on for ever, and young players must be developed to take their places. The coming decade is the crucial period of English tennis. I hope and believe it will be successfully passed. CHAPTER XIV FRANCE AND JAPAN France ANDRE GOBERT ONE of the most picturesque figures and de- lightfully polished tennis games in the world are joined in that volatile, temperamental player, Andre Gohert of France. He is a typically French product, full of finesse, art, and nerve, surrounded by the romance of a wonderful war record of his people in which he bore a magnificent part, yet un- stable, erratic, and uncertain. At his best he is in- vincible. He is the great master of tennis. At his worst he is mediocre. Gobert is at once a delight and a disappointment to a student of tennis. Gobert's service is marvellous. It is one of the great deliveries of the world. His great height (he is 6 feet 4 inches) and tremendous reach en- able him to hit a flat delivery at frightful speed, and still stand an excellent chance of it going in court. He uses very little twist, so the pace is re- markably fast. Yet Gobert lacks confidence in his service. If his opponent handles it successfully 157 158 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS Gobert is apt to slow it up and hit it soft, thus throwing away one of the greatest assets. His ground strokes are hit in beautiful form. Gobert is the exponent of the most perfect form in the world to-day. His swing is the acme of beauty. The whole stroke is perfection. He hits with a flat, slightly topped drive, feet in excellent position, and weight well controlled. It is uniform, backhand and forehand. His volleying is astonishing. He can volley hard or soft, deep or short, straight or angled with equal ease, while his tremendous reach makes him nearly impossible to pass at the net. His overhead is deadly, fast, and accurate, and he kills a lob from anywhere in the court. Why is not Gobert the greatest tennis player in the world? Personally I believe it is lack of con- fidence, a lack of fighting ability when the breaks are against him, and defeat may be his due. It is a peculiar thing in Gobert, for no man is braver than he, as his heroism during the War proved. It is simply lack of tennis confidence. It is an over- abundance of temperament. In victory Gobert is invincible, in defeat he is apt to be almost mediocre. Gobert is delightful personally. His quick wit and sense of humour always please the tennis public. His courteous manner and genial sportsmanship make him universally popular. His stroke equip- ment is unsurpassed in the tennis world. I unqualifiedly state that I consider him the most perfect tennis player, as regards strokes and foot- work, in the world to-day; but he is not the greatest FRANCE AND JAPAN 159 player. Victory is the criterion of a match player, and Gobert has not proved himself a great victor. Gobert is probably the finest indoor player in the world, while he is very great on hard courts; but his grass play is not the equal of many others. I heartily recommend Gobert's style to all students of the game, and endorse him as a model for strokes. W. LAURENTZ Another brilliant, erratic and intensely interesting figure that France has given the tennis world is Laurentz, the wonderful young player, who at the age of seventeen defeated A. F. Wilding. Laurentz is a cyclonic hitter of remarkable speed and brilliance, but prone to very severe lapses. His service is of several varieties, all well played. He uses an American twist as his regular delivery, but varies it with a sharp slice, a reverse twist of great spin, and a fast canncri-ball smash. Laurentz is very versatile. He has excellent orthodox drives, fore- and backhand, and a competent forehand chop. His volleying is brilliant almost beyond descrip- tion, but very erratic. He is very fast on his feet, and anticipates remarkably well. He will make the most hair-raising volleys, only to fall down inexplic- ably the next moment on an easy shot. His over- head is like his volley, severe, brilliant, but uncertain. Laurentz is a very hard worker, and, unlike Gobert, is always at his best when behind. He is a fair fighter and a great match player. His defeats 160 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS are due more to over-anxiety than to lack of fight. He is temperamental, sensational, and brilliant, a sportsman of the highest type, quick to recognize his opponent's good work and to give full credit for it. He is one of the most interesting players now before the public. He is a clever court general but not a great tennis thinker, playing more by instinct than by a really deep-laid plan of campaign. Laurentz might beat anyone in the world on his day or lose to the veriest dub when at his worst. Max Decugis and Brugnon, the two remaining members of the 1920 Davis Cup team of France, present totally different types. Decugis, crafty, cool, and experienced, is the veteran of many long seasons of match play. He is a master tactician, and wins most of his matches by out-generalling the other player. Brugnon is brilliant, flashy, hard hitting, erratic, and inexperienced. He is very young, hardly twenty years of age. He has a fine fore-hitting style and excellent net attack, but lacks confidence and a certain knowledge of tennis fundamentals. A few years' experience will do wonders for him. The French style of play commends itself to me very highly. I enjoy watching the well-executed strokes, beautiful mobile footwork of these dashing players. It is more a lack of dogged determination to win, than in any stroke fault that one finds the reason for French defeats. The temperamental genius of this great people carries with it a lack of LOUIS RAYMOND South Africa B. I. C. NORTON South Africa ^K2KSS-»SSbw>^- — - Z. F. SHIMBDZTJ Japan N. MISHTJ Roumania mm HP? PLATE XV «" tX M* ^, >iik MLLE. LEN6LEJT France MISS ELIZABETH RYAN America MRS. FRANKLIN L. MALLORY [molla bjurstedt] America MRS. LARCOMBE AND MRS. LAMBERT CHAMBERS British Isles PLATE XVI FRANCE AND JAPAN 161 stability that can be the only explanation for the sudden crushing and unexpected defeats their re- presentatives receive on the tennis courts. Japan A new element has entered the tennis world in the last decade. The Orient has thrust its shadow over the courts in the persons of a small group of remarkable tennis players, particularly Ichija Kumagae and Zenzo Shimidzu, the famous Japanese stars. Kumagae, who for some years reigned supreme in Japan and Honolulu, has lived in America for the past three years. Shimidzu is a product of Calcutta, where he has lived for some years. No player has caused more discussion than Kumagae, unless it is Shimidzu ; while surely no man received more critical comment than Shimidzu, ex- cept Kumagae. The press of America and England have vied with each other in exploiting these two men. There was unanimity of opinion concerning these two men in one respect. No liner sportsman nor more delightful opponents can be found than these Japanese. They have won the respect and friendship of all who have met them. Kumagae is the greater tennis player. He came to America in 191 6, the possessor of a wonderful forehand drive and nothing else. Kumagae is left- handed, which made his peculiar shots all the harder to handle. He met with fair success during the year; his crowning triumph was his defeat of W. M. John- 162 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS ston at Newport in five sets. He lost to J. J. Arm- strong, Watson M. Washburn, and George M. Church. He learned much during his year in Amer- ica, and returned to Japan a wiser man, with a firm determination to add to his tennis equipment. In 19 17 Kumagae returned to America to enter business in New York. Once established there he began developing his game. First he learned an American twist service and then strenghtened his backhand. That year he suffered defeat at the hands of Walter T. Hayes and myself. He was steadily improving. He now started coming to the net and learning to volley. He is not yet a good low volleyer, and never will be while he uses the peculiar grip common to his people; but his high volleying and overhead are now excellent. Last year Kumagae reached his top form and was ranked third in America. His defeats were by Johnston, Vincent Richards, and myself; while he defeated Murray, S. H. Voshell, Vincent Richards, and me, as well as countless players of less note. The season of 1920 found Kumagae sweeping all before him, since JoTinston, Williams, Garland, and I were away on the Davis Cup trip. Williams barely defeated him in a better match, just previously to sailing. Kumagae left America in the middle of the summer to compete in the Olympic games, rep- resenting Japan. Kumagae is still essentially a base-line player of marvellous accuracy of shot and speed of foot. His drive is a lethal weapon that spreads destruction FRANCE AND JAPAN 163 among his opponents. His backhand is a severe "poke," none too accurate, but very deadly when it goes in. His service overhead and high volley are all severe and reliable. His low volley is the weak spot in an otherwise great game. Kumagae cannot handle a chop, and dislikes grass-court play, as the ball bounds too low for his peculiar "loop" drive. He is one of the greatest hard-court players in the world, and one of the most dangerous opponents at any time on any surface. Shimidzu is not so dangerous yet as Kumagae. He, too, is a base-line player, but lacks Kumagae's terrific forehand drive. Shimidzu has a superior backhand to Kumagae, but his weak service rather offsets this. His low volleying is far superior to Kumagae, while his high volleying and overhead are quite the equal. He^has not the fighting qualities in his game that make Kumagae so dangerous, but he has not had the experience. Shimidzu learns very quickly, and I look to see him a great factor in the game in future years. Both Shimidzu and Kumagae are marvellous court coverers, and seem absolutely untiring. They are "getters" of almost unbelievable activity, and ac- curate to a point that seems uncanny. Both men hit to the lines with a certainty that makes it very dangerous to attempt to take the net on anything except a deep forcing shot that hurries them. With such players as Kumagae and Shimidzu, fol- lowed By S. Kashio and K. Yamasaki, and the late H. Mikami, Japan is a big factor in future tennis. 164 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS 192 1 may see Japan challenging for the Davis Cup, and none but a first-class team can stop them. The advent of a Japanese team with such players will mean that next year we must call out our best to repel the Oriental invasion: so competition receives another stimulus that should raise our standard of play. The possibility of journeying to Japan to chal- lenge for the Davis Cup is not so remote but that we must consider it as a future possibility. CHAPTER XV THE COLONIES Australasia THE death of that sterling sportsman, Anthony F. Wilding, and the natural decline in the playing powers of Norman E. Brookes, owing to the advance of years and his war experiences, leave Australasia (Australia and New Zealand) in a somewhat uncertain condition regarding its tennis prospects. NORMAN E. BROOKES Volumes have been written about N. E. Brookes and his tennis genius, but I would not feel right if I could not pay at least a slight tribute to the great- est tennis player and genius of all time. There is no need to dwell on Brookes' shots, his marvellous mechanical perfection, his peculiar vol- leying style, his uncanny anticipation. All these are too well known to need my feeble description. They are but the expression of that wonderful brain and dominant personality that lie behind that sphinx- like face we know as Brookes'. To see across the net those ever-restless, ever- 165 166 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS moving eyes, picking the openings in my never too- well guarded court, and know that against me is pitted the greatest tennis brain of the century, is to call upon me to produce my best. That is what my match with Brookes meant to me, and still does to-day. Brookes should be an inspiration to every tennis player, for he has proved the power of mind over matter in tennis: "Age cannot wither nor custom stale his infinite variety." Brookes is the most eminently just man on a tennis court I have ever met, for no excitement or emotion clouds his eyesight or judgment in de- cisions. He cannot abide bad decisions, yet he hates them quite as much when they favour him as when they are against him. I admit frankly I am a great admirer of Brookes, personally and from every tennis sense. He is a master that I as a student of the game feel proud to study under. GERALD PATTERSON Australia's leading player, Gerald Patterson, is one of the most remarkable combinations of tennis virtues and tennis faults I have ever seen. Patterson has a wonderful service. He has speed, direction, control, and all kinds of twist. He hits his service consistently hard and puts it in. His overhead is the most remarkable in the game. He can kill from any place in the court. His shot is clean, with little effort, yet carries terrific speed. His volleying above the net is almost faultless on his forehand. He has an excellent forehand drive THE COLONIES 167 that is very severe and consistent, but his back- hand . . . Where in all the rest of tennis history was there a first-class man with a backhand so fundamentally wrong? His grip is bad, he pulls up on the ball and "loops" it high in the air. I do not mean Patterson always misses his backhand. He does not. He even makes remarkable shots off it at times, but, if Patterson is pressed, his backhand is the first portion of his game to crack, because it is hit inherently wrong. Patterson relies mainly on speed to win matches. He is not a strategist, and finesse is not part of his tennis equipment. He has a magnifient physique, and relies largely on his strength to carry him through a long match and win in the end. He is very quiet, and inclined to be somewhat careless on the court, unless pressed, when his busi- nesslike, determined play shows what a great match player Patterson can become. He produces his best game at the crucial moment of the match. Pat- terson is a superior match player to his real tennis ability. His is not truly a top-notch game. It has superlative features, but its whole texture is not of the finest. Patterson owes much of his success in 19 19 to Brookes, under whose guidance he played. The absence of the master mind directing his attack proved a decided handicap in 1920, and Patterson's attack was not so certain nor sustained as in the previous season. Patterson's game plus Brookes' strategy would be a great combination in one man. 168 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS R. V. Thomas and Pat. O'Hara Wood, two of the greatest doubles players in the world, are among the remaining Australians who may be counted upon as Davis Cup calibre, and therefore of world-wide importance. These two men in partnership won the world's title in 19 19 at Wimbledon. They created a record by winning the Australian doubles title two years in succession. They are a team of sound games, excellent strategy, and determined fighting qualities. Young Anderson, who played in the Davis Cup singles in 19 19, is another sensational player of the Patterson school. His future develop- ment is a matter of conjecture. The mantle of Wilding and Brookes must fall on the shoulders of a really great player. Who it will be is hard to say at present. No outstanding figure looms on the horizon at the time of writing. South Africa The 1920 South African Davis Cup team players, following their disastrous defeat by Holland, jour- neyed to England for the Championship and follow- ing tournaments, and I had the opportunity of studying three players of great promise. The re- maining two were excellent, but hardly as exceptional as the former. Charles Winslow, the leading player in the team, had a remarkable versatile game. He uses a high, bounding service of good speed, which at times he follows to the net. His best ground stroke is a severe chop, not unlike Wallace F. Johnson. He has THE COLONIES 169 a good drive both forehand and backhand, which he only uses when pressed or in attempting to pass a net man. He volleys very well, and covers the net quickly. His overhead is very severe, steady, and reliable. He is a fine natural player just below the top flight. He is an excellent strategist, and mixes his shots very well. He has exceptionally fast foot- work, and repeatedly runs around his backhand to chop diagonally across the court in a manner very similar to Johnson. B. I. C. Norton, the South African Champion, a youngster of twenty, is a phenomenal player of ex- treme brilliancy. He has everything in stroke equip- ment, drives, slices, volleys, and a fine service and overhead. Unfortunately Norton regards his tennis largely as a joke. His judgment is therefore faulty, and he is apt to loaf on the court. He tries the most impossible shots that sometimes go in; and in the main, his court generalship is none too good. He is an irrepressible boy, and his merry smile and chatter make him a tremendous favourite with the gallery. He has a very strong personality that would carry him a long way. Louis Raymond, the left-handed star of the South Africans, has an excellent ground game coupled with a good service and fair volleying and overhead. His game is not remarkable. He is a hard-working, deserving player who attains success by industry rather than natural talent. His judgment is sound and methods of play orthodox, except for a tendency to run around his backhand. 170 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS C. R. Blackboard, the youngest member of the team, and G. H. Dodd, its captain, were both very excellent players of the second flight. Blackbeard is very young, not yet twenty, and may develop into a star. At present he chops too much, and is very erratic. • •••••• There are many other players whom I would analyse if I had the time or space ; but in&these days of paper shortage and ink scarcity, conservation is the keynote of the times. Let me turn for a few moments to the women whose fame in the tennis world is the equal of the men I have been analysing. CHAPTER XVI FAMOUS WOMEN PLAYERS MLLE. SUZANNE LENGLEN THERE is no more unique personality, nor more remarkable player among the women than Mile. Suzanne Lenglen, the famous French girl who holds the World's Championship title. Mile. Lenglen is a remarkable figure in the sporting world. She has personality, individuality, and magnetism that hold the public interest. She is the biggest drawing card in the tennis world. Mile. Lenglen' s fame rests on her drive. Strange though it may seem, her drive is the least interesting part of her game. Mile. Lenglen uses a severe over- head service of good speed. It is a remarkable service for a woman, one which many men might do well to copy. Her famous forehand drive is a full arm swing from the shoulder. It meets the ball just as Mile. Lenglen springs in the air. The result is pictorially unique, but not good tennis. She loses speed and power by this freak. Her backhand is beautifully played, from perfect footwork, with a free swing and topped drive. It is a remarkable 171 172 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS stroke. Her volleying is perfect in execution and re- sult. She hits her overhead smash freely with a "punch" that is as great as many men. It is as fine an overhead as that of Mrs. George Wightman, the American Champion. Mile. Lenglen's speed of foot is marvellous. She runs fast and easily. She delights in acrobatic jumps, many of them unnecessary, at all times during her play. She is a wonderful gallery player, and wins the popularity that her dashing style deserves. She is a brilliant court general, conducting her at- tack with a keen eye on both the court and the gallery. Mile. Lenglen is not outstanding among the women players of the world, in my opinion. She is probably the best to-day, yet Mrs. Lambert Cham- bers, Mrs. George Wightman, Miss Elizabeth Ryan, Mrs. Franklin L. Mallory (formerly Miss Molla Bjurstedt), Miss Mary Browne, and Mrs. May Sutton Bundy are all in her class. There is no woman playing tennis to-day that has the powerful personality of Mile. Lenglen. Her acrobatic style and grace on the court form an appeal no gallery can resist. Her very mannerisms fool people into considering her far greater than she really is, even though she is a wonderful player. In rharked contrast to the eccentricities of Mile. Lenglen one finds the delightfully polished style of Mrs. Lambert Chambers. Mrs. Chambers has a purely orthodox game of careful execution that any FAMOUS WOMEN PLAYERS 173 student of the game should recognize as the highest form of tennis strokes. Mrs. Chambers serves an overhead delivery of no particular movement She slices or "spoons' * her ground strokes, forehand or backhand. She seldom volleys or smashes. Her only excursions to the net are when she is drawn to the net. It is not Mrs. Chambers' game itself so much as what she does with it, that I commend so highly. Her change of pace and distance is wonderfully controlled. Her accuracy marvellous. Her judg- ment is remarkable, and the way in which she saves undue exertion is an art in itself. She gets a wonder- ful return for her outlay of effort. Hers is a personality of negation. Her manner on the court is negative, her shots alone are positive. She is never flustered, and rarely shows emotion. Mrs. Chambers is the u Mavro" of women as regards her recovering ability. Her errors are re- duced to a minimum at all times. To err is human ; but at times there is something very nearly inhuman about Mrs. Chambers' tennis. Among the other women in England who are de- lightfully original in their games are Mrs. Lar- combe, the wonderful chop-stroke player, whose clever generalship and tactics place her in the front rank; Mrs. M'Nair, with her volleying attack; Miss Elizabeth Ryan, an American living in England, who combines a vicious chop with a brilliant volley and overhead, and many others only slightly less notable. 174 THE ART OF LAWN TENNIS America boasts of a large group of rising young women players who are but a step behind the first flight of Mrs. George Wightman, our National Champion, Mrs. Franklin L. Mallory, and Miss Mary Browne. Mrs. Wightman has a remarkable game, not un- like Miss Ryan's. She chops viciously fore- or back- hand, and at times drives as well. She uses an over- head service and smash. Her volleying is the finest of any woman I have ever seen. Her overhead is hit with a peculiar wrist-snap, unique in the game. Mrs. Wightman is the finest mixed doubles player I have ever watched. Her knowledge of the game is phenomenal, and only a lack of stamina stands between her and any title. She is a remarkable tennis genius. Her psychology is worthy of Brookes. Mrs. Mallory at her best is second to no woman in the world, in my opinion. I say this in full knowl- edge of her record in England during 1920. I am not offering alibis for Mrs. Mallory, but I state that at no time on her trip was she within "15" of her average game. Mrs. Mallory is a base-line player with the finest drive, fore- and backhand, I have ever seen. She has no overhead, while her volleying is of the "stroke" variety and therefore wrong. Yet ordi- narily she can place a ball at will from the base-line or off service so accurately that she does not need her net attack. I look to see a terrific match in 1 92 1 , when Mrs. Mallory returns to strive to challenge Mile. Lenglen for her title. It is sheer speed of FAMOUS WOMEN PLAYERS 175 stroke and foot with which Mrs. Mallory wins, and next year may see her gain the heights of world's champion. America has a large group of such brilliant young stars as Miss Marion Zinderstern of Boston, a pro- tegee of Mrs. Wightman, a girl with a well-rounded game of great promise; Miss Elinor Goss of New York, a player of latent possibilities second to none ; Miss Eleanor Sears, Miss Helene Pollak, Miss Molly Thayes, Miss Ann Townsend, and many more. Women's tennis in England is on a slightly higher plane at this time than in America ; but the standard of play in America is rapidly coming up. Interna- tional competition between women on the lines of the Davis Cup, for which a trophy has previously been offered by Lady Wavertree in England, and in 1 9 19 by Mrs. Wightman in America, and twice re- fused by the International Federation, would do more than any other factor to place women's tennis on the high plane desired. This plan has succeeded for the men, why should it not do as well for the women? t*. ^, 3? V 8HHBH 11 n ■■■■■"■' S UBBHI •■■■■•■ ■I HiiBiln LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 0029712 930 2 si^llilPilifflnei bbu ^Wffsmm^m Jwrnmrn B HmHP HiHlBi liffiHr J H ■ MGSffiffl us HQffiaHi HI Si ■ ■ ^H IB I H in B wit WmMBlBW HIS m Mr ■lliiiHi