■f
THE PUBLIC SCHOOL
HISTORY OF COMMON SCHOOL/ EDUCATION IN NEW YORK FROM 1633 TO 1904
BY CHARL.ES E. FITCH
Prepared under the direction of Charles R. Skinner, Superintendent of Public Instruction
J. B. LYON COMPANY, PRINTERS
ALBANY, NEW YORK
D367111-N4-1000
EDUCATIONAL HISTORY
A History of the common school in New York
B Biographical sketches of superintendents of public
instruction
MAY 24 i905
i). ot 0.
A History of the common school in New York
Prepared by Charles E. Fitc« under the direction of the Superintendent of
Public Instruction
It is fifty years since the Department of Public
Instruction was instituted. A review of its adminis-
tration during that period is pertinent at its close as
is also reference to what was done for education in
New York previously thereto.
In the development of popular education in the ™* ^'V
United States, New York is entitled to primacy in two New York
respects — the genesis of the common school system and
supervision of the same by the state. That system has
been defined and promoted by various commonwealths
and aided by grants from the federal government, until
there are throughout the union schools free to all, con-
serving a patriotic citizenship and assuring an en-
lightened nation, but it is from New York that the chief
leadings, those of public provision for their maintenance
and central authority for their conduct have proceeded.
The first public school in the country was that which J*,f J^ st
was begun in New Amsterdam in 1G33 with Adam
Roelandson as its master. Precedence in this regard
must be accorded to the Dutch colony of New Nether-
land. Other colonies followed, if they were not stimu-
lated by, its example. There can be no dispute as to
the chronological order. It is said but not shown that New Eng.
a school existed in the town of Plymouth in 1633, and schools
one in Marshfield in 1615. In 1G73, fifty-three years
after Plymouth Rock was sighted, the court ordered the
setting up of a sehool to be supported by the revenue
from the Cape fishery. Boston, in Massachusetts Bay,
in 1C35, " at a general meeting upon public notice "
voted "that our brother, Philemon Pormont shall be
entreated to become schoolmaster for the teaching and
nurturing children with us," but there is no evidence
that the request was acceded to. The next year " at a
general meeting of the richer inhabitants, there was
given towards the maintenance of a free schoolmaster
for the youth with us, Mr Daniel Maud being now also
chosen thereunto." In 1611 it was ordered that Deare
Island should be occupied for the keeping of a free
school (so called) for the town. In 1643, Dedham set
apa^*t sixty acres for the use of the church and a free
Department of Public Instruction
school. In 1643 Roxbury allowed £20 a year for the
support of a schoolmaster, to be raised out of property
bestowed by certain of its inhabitants, and a little later
Charlestown, Cambridge, Dorchester, Ipswich and
Salem made similar arrangements. In 1642, the Gen-
eral Court ordered that children should be brought up
to learning and labor, imposing fines upon parents and
others who neglected their duty in these particulars,
and on November 11, 1647, it passed the celebrated
statute, which is sometimes assumed to be the precursor
of all school legislation in the land and, with preamble,
quaint and fantastic now, but sincere and serious then,
revealing the theocratic inclination of its framers,
decreed that in order to thwart the designs of " that
old deluder Satan," " every township in this jurisdic-
tion after the Lord hath increased them to the number
of fifty householders, shall then forthwith appoint one
within their town to teach all such children as shall
resort to him to write and read, whose wages shall be
paid either by the parents or masters of such children,
or by the inhabitants in general, by way of supply, as
the major part of those that order the prudentials of
the town shall appoint." Connecticut, with settlement
beginning in 1634, soon thereafter gave attention to
educational matters; Hartford, in 1642, appropriating
£50 annually for a school, in which the tuition fees
were 20 shillings a year, the children of parents unable
to pay being instructed at town charge; and, in the
code of laws adopted in 1650, the Massachusetts ordi-
nance of 1647 was incorporated verbatim and made
imperative upon all the towns. New Haven, shortly
after its settlement, in 1637, enjoined the deputies in
each plantation to see that all parents and masters,
either by their own ability and labor, or by employing
such schoolmasters and other agencies as the plantation
might afford, should have their children and appren-
tices taught to read the scriptures and other books in
the English tongue, and those who failed in their duty
were to be fined, and, if they continued contumacious,
their charges were to be placed in the hands of those
who would better educate and govern them. The town
of New Haven, in 1642, ordered that a free school be
set up and a schoolmaster, Ezekiel Cheever, was
presently hired at £20 a year, his salary being subse-
quently increased to £30, and in 1657 the General Court
ordained that every plantation should provide a school-
A rbtikw or r-rs administration 3
master, one-third of hi* salary to be paid by the town
and two-thirds by the parents or guardians of the pupils.
The territory of Connecticut was enlarged in 1665 by
the absorption of New Haven, and various school laws
were matured, that of 1G78 requiring that towns of
thirty families should keep a school " to teach children
to read and write " being the most precise in its man-
dates. Other colonies laid the foundations of their
common school systems respectively as follows: Rhode ^""Jjjt 1
Island in 1640; New Hampshire in 1649; Delaware in tions gen-
1657; Pennsylvania in 1683; Maryland in 1694; Vir erally
ginia in 1752.
These dates determine the precedence of New Nether-
land in planting the elementary school in American soil.
She was the pioneer. Nor was this merely the accident
of primordial settlement. In the evolution of the
republican state, the Dutch anticipated their neighbors
in appreciating responsibility for the education of the
young and in designing the measures necessary to that so™of "~
end. The Pilgrims, notwithstanding their sojourn in I? nt ?" a,ld
° » J Puritan
Holland and the inspiration there extended, made, as inspiration
has been seen, long delay. The Puritans came to the
Atlantic coast in considerable numbers in 162S, and the
great migration occurred in 1630. Among the laymen
there were those of high intellectual endowments; many
were of comfortable estate; some possessed large
wealth ; while the clerical element, paramount in
influence, was specially able and liberally educated.
Within twelve years from the landing at Salem, there
were eighty ministers in Massachusetts who had been
ordained in the church of England and who were nearly
all graduates from Cambridge university. The Puri-
tans were a compact and homogeneous body, well
equipped and well organized, with a definite object in
view. That object was to found a Christian state in
the new world — " to raise a bulwark against anti-
Christ " as John White, the chief promoter of the enter-
prise, declared. To this all their thoughts were directed *
and all their energies were devoted. They brought
with them English ideas, customs and institutions,
among which was not the common school. That was
the creation of succeeding years. The people in Eng-
land knew nothing of the common school and the
English people who came to America did not bring it
with them. The charter, wrested from the king, with
its distinct enunciation of corporate rights and privi
1 Department of Public Enstruction
leges, construed by its grantees as adequate for the
government they fashioned, embraced no educational
warrant.
Although Henry Hudson ascended the river, which
bears his name, in 1609, it was not until twenty years
The settle- later that the real settlement of New Netherland began.
New ivetn- New York owes her being, not to lofty religious senti-
ment, as does New England, nor to passion for stirring-
adventure, as does Virginia, but to Dutch genius for
trade. But growth was, at the first, slow. In 1G29 the
inhabitants consisted only of the little company of
Walloons, who had come over in 1G24 and tbe servants
of the West India company, grouped at trading posts
from Manhattan io Beverwyck (Albany), who were
wholly engrossed in exchanging baubles and trinkets
for furs with the Indians and returning inordinate
profits to their employers therefrom. There were in the
territory three or four small forts, but there were no
mechanical industries, no tilling of the earth except
for the bare necessities of the scanty population, and
but feeble attempts at the making of homes. The com-
pany had, in 1621, been granted a monopoly of tra le
on the coasts of Africa and America and invested with
almost sovereign powers by the States General of the
United Netherlands, the latter retaining some control
by commissioning the governors and demanding reports
from them, but experience had shown that no benefits
accrued to the plantation beyond those from the com-
merce in peltries and that the interests of the company
would l»e enhanced, as it was also (dear that the
resources of the company could be utilized, only by
stimulating colonization. With the larger outlook,
charter of came the charter of freedoms and exemptions issued by
amiVv-"* the company June 7. 102!), to all such as should colonize
emptions^ ^ eyy Netherland. This instrument was singularly
inconsistent in its articles. While it asserted the
liberties of the individual and guaranteed him certain
notable immunities of person and property, its conces
sions of immense manors confirmed feudal tenures
and customs, exalted caste, magnified proprietary fran-
chises and grievously vexed colonial and even state
administration far into the nineteenth century. Its
invitation to immigration, however, was a broad one,
becoming more generous in 163S, when each settler was
promised as much land as he could cultivate, was
granted practically free trade with the mother country,
A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION »
and equal justice was pledged to all inhabitants and
visitors, in civil and criminal proceedings. Under
these benign behests, the earth yielded its harvests,
thrift followed frugality, communities expanded and
law reigned.
But the distinguishing and now illustrious feature of
the charter of 1629 was the prescription concerning
education. It was that " the patrons and colonists £**ai d prel
shall in particular, and in the speediest manner, scription
endeavor to find out ways and means whereby they may
support a minister and schoolmaster that thus the
service of God and zeal for religion may not grow cool
and be neglected among them, and they shall, for the
first procure a comforter of the sick there."
This was the first educational edict in America. 1 1
was reaffirmed substantially in the " New Project of
Freedoms and Exemptions " in 1630, and in 1638 it was
made obligatory that " each householder and inhabi-
tant shall bear such tax and public charge.as shall here-
after be considered proper for the maintenance of
clergymen, comforters for the sick and like necessary
officers and the director and council there (New Nether-
land) shall be written to touching the form hereof, in
order on receiving further information hereupon, it be
rendered the least onerous and vexatious ;" and, in 1640,
the company assumed formally certain responsibilities
which, indeed, it had already generously borne, in these
"words: "And no other religion shall be publicly admit-
ted in New Netherland, except the Reformed, as at pres-
ent preached and practiced by public authority in the
United Netherlands, and for this purpose the company
shall promote and maintain good and suitable
preachers, schoolmasters and comforters of the sick."
Spiritual instruction was, of course, dictated, as was
the rule in all Protestant lands, and the divorce of
church and state was yet remote, but in these several
rescripts, the means by which the cost of the common
school was defrayed, for more than two centuries, were
indicated. Thev were public largess, general taxation, Early
, , , , '. , . „ , , , . , methods
and ratable tuition fees, and upon this scheme, no of support-
essential improvement was made, until the free school, Jj , o s n ednca-
in its integrity, was willed by the people. It is not
contended that these agencies were operative concur-
rently and continuously for the whole period, nor that
there were not lapses in their application at certain
I imes and places, but, in larger or lesser measure, either
Department of Public Instruction
The Dutch
school :i
public
school
Definition
of tlie conL
rami school suffice
system
separately or jointly, they obtained throughout, and the
credit of founding the public school in America must
be conceded to the Dutch and particularly to the policy
of the Dutch West India company, itself derived from
the methods which had long prevailed in Holland and
made it the most thoroughly educated nation in Europe.
Henri Taine says : " In culture and instruction, as well
as in the arts of organization and government, the
Dutch are two centuries ahead of the rest of Europe;"
and if this is true now, it certainly was then. It is sug-
gested that the early Dutch school in New Netherland
was not a public school, in the American acceptation,
as not conforming to the definition of such " as estab-
lished, supported and controlled by the people acting in
their political capacity as a civil body politic.'' This
definition formulated to fit a case in a controversy as
to primacy is narrow and misleading. The inquiry
does not depend so much upon the manner in which
the American school had being as upon what manner
of school it was — not whether it was appointed by the
public but whether it was conducted for the public.
The question is not as to whether New York, under
the West India company and the States General, had
less or more of popular government than Massachusetts,
under the theocracy and its articles of incorporation.
It is as to which served the cause of popular education
the sooner and the better. Magna Charta is an in-
delible sign manual of human freedom, even if it was
forced from the sovereign by feudal barons, with their
hands on their swords, and was not of parliamentary
persuasion. Although the schools of Prussia were of
autocratic dispensation, they are free in fullest mean
: ng and broadest view. The narrow definition does nol
An accurate statement of what the common
school system is has been framed by President Andrew
S. Draper. It is a system of "schools for the common
welfare and the public security, supported by public
moneys, managed by public officers, in which all the
people have common rights and which are free from
whatever may offend conscience or abridge those
rights;" and, as the Educational Review says, "the
germ of this system is to be found in the schools estab-
lished by the early Dutch settlers in New Amsterdam."
Inasmuch as two clergymen of the Reformed church,
Sebastian Crol and John Huyck, ministered in 1626
in New Amsterdam, when it numbered barely one hun
A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION i
died souls and as, in the infant Dutch communities, ^^"'h.
the parson and the pedagogue might be one and the ™£°°J~
same, it is a fair inference that either or both of these
instructed the young and that the keeping of school
began in the year mentioned, an inference which is
strengthened by the fact that the colonial estimate for
1625 included the salary of a schoolmaster at 360 florins,
but no record to that effect, remains. The Dutchman
was not so diligent a chronicler as the Puritan who
tallied every step he took and wrote history as he made
it. The educational data of New Netherland are sadly
deficient. The opening, however, of the school by Roe-
landson, in 1633, is amply authenticated and it has a
long and honorable history. The succession of its trus-
tees and teachers has been preserved. With occasional
interruptions, it was continued as a public school dur-
ing the Dutch ascendancy, ceased as such with the
English occupancy, in 1664, being thereafter sustained
by the consistory of the Reformed church, under the
direct supervision of its deacons, was discontinued dur-
ing the revolutionary war, was reorganized in 1783 and
is still in existence as the school of the Collegiate Re-
formed church in the city of New York.
In 1652, New Amsterdam obtained a municipal char- ^I^er 1 * 001 *
ter and a second school was inaugurated. The city was Dutch rule
to manage its own finances and was directed to pay
all official salaries, including those of the schoolmasters,
but it neglected to do so and, two years later, the
colonial government resumed the collection of taxes
and their disbursement. As towns were erected on
Long Island and the Hudson, it was the uniform prac-
tice to reserve lots for school sites, and houses were
built thereon. Thus there were public schools at Flat-
bush, Newtown, Hempstead, Southampton, Brooklyn,
Esopus, Albany and other places, and licenses for pri-
vate schools were freely issued. For the last eighteen
years of Dutch rule, Petrus Stuyvesant was director-
general, and that doughty w r arrior and stern execu-
tive seems to have been deeply impressed with the im-
portance of the common school as related to the weal
of the state. His deliverances in its behalf were not
infrequent. In his proclamation of September 22, 1647,
proposing the appointment of nine men as tribunes or
advisors to himself and his council from a list of eight-
een nominated to him by the inhabitants, he stated his
reasons therefor, as follows : "Whereas, we desire noth-
Department op Public Instri
The
natnral
order of
scliool
establish-
ment
ing more than that the government of New Nethcrbnd,
entrusted to our care, and principally New Amster-
dam, our capital and residence, might continue and in-
crease in good order, justice, police, population, pros-
perity and mutual harmony, and be provided with
strong fortifications, a church, a school, trading place,
harbor and similar highly necessary public edifices and
improvements, for which end we are desirous of obtain-
ing the assistance of our whole commonalty, as nothing
is better adapted to promote their own welfare and com-
fort, and as such as is required in every well regulated
government." He wrote earnestly to the classis of Am-
sterdam "for a pious, well qualified and diligent school-
master" for "nothing" he adds "is of greater importance
than the right, early instruction of youth." In November
of the same year, he announced to the nine men that the
company could contribute a portion of the sum needed
for educational purposes and that it would continue
such aid regularly "to promote the glorious work" prom-
ising also that a schoolroom and a dwelling for the
master should be supplied during the ensuing winter.
In 1658, he welcomed Alexander Carolus Curtius and
informed the company of his arrival. "We hope and
confide" he said, "that the company shall reap gnat
benefits from it for their children, for which we pray
that a bountiful God may vouchsafe his blessing." Rec-
tor Curtius came as the principal of a Latin, or gram-
mer school, which the company provided.
The Dutch observed the natural order in their educa-
tional economy. They attended first to the elementary
and next to the secondary department. The latter, they
held, was the sequence of the former. They did not
plan the college, because of lack of means and possibly
because they thought that individual incentive and
patronage would suffice for it when it should be
demanded. Indeed. New York, as a state, has been
quite consistent in its adherence to the voluntary prin-
ciple in higher education. Aside from a few gifts in
the earlier stages of its development, now wholly dis-
continued and for denominational institutions consti-
tutionally inhibited and certain recent provision for
courses in practical industries, the state has, while exer-
cising a mild supervision over its colleges and profes-
sional schools refused pecuniary assistance to them.
The amount heretofore donated, exclusive of $305,000
derived from lotteries, is less than $450,000, the last
A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION
appropriation — $25,000 — being to the Elmira female
college in 18G7. The chief concern of the state is for
the common school. Both the Puritan and the Cava-
lier reversed the natural order. The primal educational
enactment in Massachusetts was an appropriation of
£000 to Harvard college, for which, as fitting students
for the ministry, the theocracy always evinced the
liveliest solicitude; and, in Virginia, the charter of Wil-
liam and Mary antedated, by over sixty years, any legis-
lation for institutions of a lower grade. Throughout his
administration, Stuyvesant continued to manifest an
interest in education, and, at its close, public schools
existed in nearly every town and village, imparting in-
struction in Latin, Greek, mathematics, reading and
writing — drill in the catechism not being omitted—
through the medium of the Dutch vernacular and,
toward the end, through the English tongue also.
Under the rule of the English, the common school J t !' b e ools
languished in New York, such of its life as lingered H£ d ^ .
being mainly referable to the insistence of certain Dutch rule
communities upon its sustenance by taxation; and, it
is noteworthy that, during the brief Dutch reoccupa-
tion, care was again bestowed upon it by the provincial
authorities. In December, 1073, it was ordered by Gov-
ernor-General Colve and the council that all the inhabi-
tants of the town of Bergen, which was then within
their jurisdiction, should pay their share for the sup-
port of the precentor and schoolmaster, and, in May,
1074, it was further ordered that the sheriff proceed to
immediate execution against all persons who still
declined to pay. As Daniel J. Pratt says in his An-
nals of Public Education, " the foregoing action on the
part of the governor and council seems to have fully
settled and confirmed the policy of the Dutch admin-
istration in regard to free public schools supported
solely by taxation, and w T hich, but for the reconquest by
the English, might, perhaps, have continued without
interruption to this day."
It is not to be inferred, as has already been intimated
that elementary education perished utterly under
English rule. In 1(105, Governor Nicolls licensed one
John Schutte "for the teaching of the English tongue"
at Albany, upon the ground that such teaching was
necessary to the government, and upon the condition
that he should "not demand any more wages from each
scholar than is given by the Dutch to their Dutch school-
10 Department ok Public Instruction
master." It is not a violent assumption that defi-
ciencies in his compensation were to be made up in
the Dutch manner. In 1671, Governor Lovelace
directed the justices of the peace, constables and over-
seers of the town of Hempstead to cause speedy pay-
ment to be made to Richard Charlton of the arrears
of his salary as schoolmaster, according to the terms
of the contract made with him by the town. In 1691,
immediately succeeding the so-called Leisler rebellion,
Richard Ingoldesby, commander-in-chief of the province
of New York and the honorable council ordered that Jorst
de Baane, the schoolmaster of New Utrecht, should re-
ceive the salary duehim as such, and that no other school-
master should officiate in the town without a license from
the government. This order was in compliance with a
petition of the resident justice of the peace and the min-
ister setting forth that because De Baane had refused
to side with the rebellion, certain ill-affected persons
had compelled him "to forsake the place, although the
land, out of which the schoolmaster and reader of the
town is maintained, was given to the town by the said
justice, out of his proper estate." The school, started
in Flatbush in 1659, was continued until 1802, when it
was absorbed in the academy. The list of its teachers
has been preserved, as also have the articles of agree-
ment of the town with two of these — Jan Tibout, in
1681, and Johannes Van Ekkelen, in 16S2 — from which
it appears that each was to receive a salary of 400
guilders, in addition to tuition fees, and perquisites for
bell-tolling, the delivery of funeral invitations and other
functions vested in his office. The schools that were
licensed by the early English governors, especially by
Lord Cornbury, may be regarded fairly as public ones.
Among these were the license to Thomas Huddleston,
on the 5th of December, 1705, "to teach the English
language, writing and arithmetic, in the town of
Jamaica, Queens county" and that to Thomas Jeffrey,
on the 17th of April, 1706, " to keep and teach school
within the city of New York and to instruct all children
with whom you shall be intrusted in the art of reading
and arithmetic for and during my (Oornbury's) pleas-
ure;" and, in July, 1712, authority was given by Gover-
nor Hunter to Allane Jarratt "to teach writing, arith-
metic and navigation and other parts of the mathe-
matics to all such persons as shall be desirous to be
Instructed therein within the oity or province of New
York."
A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 11
Any account of education in New York would be™* y s £; r
singularly incomplete which did not, at least, allude the Propa-
to the service rendered it by the Society for the Pro pa- tiie Gospel
gation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts. It was and part» re sn
still is a missionary body of the church of England.
Organized in 1701, its object, as stated, in 1730, by its
secretary, the Rev. David Humphreys, D. D., was
two-fold, to wit, "to unite the growing generation in
their language, as well as in their religious principles."
The school was to do battle for the supremacy of En-
glish speech and the ecclesiastical order. The society
bestowed annual stipends upon its schoolmasters,
ranging from £10 to £40, the first school being located
at Rye in 1704. Between that year and 1775 it em-
ployed about 60 teachers, schools being maintained in
the counties of Albany, Suffolk, New York, Richmond
and Westchester. The pupils were mainly the children
of poor parents and included quite a proportion of
slaves and some Indians. In addition to supplying
teachers, the society offered in 1728 to found a library
in New York city, provided the books it donated should
be cared for properly. Governor Montgomery laid the
proposition before the assembly, which promptly ac-
cepted it, with a vote of thanks, and assurance that a
bill should be passed for the preservation of the volumes
when they should arrive. They came, but the assem-
bly failed to redeem its promise and no further action
in the premises was had. The society did excellent ser-
vice, which it is proper to recognize even at this distant
day and to admit the claim that, with its ministrations,
it has rightful place in the common school succession.
Under English rule, the work of the society was con-
scientiously prosecuted; certain Dutch schools, with
the auspices and conditions indicated, remained in
being and licenses were granted to English schools. It
is significant that upon a map of the city of New York,
made from an actual survey by T. Maerochalcken, in
17(33, both the Dutch and English free schools are
designated.
While, therefore, it is true that, with the latitude ^StSi
of interpretation as to its quality, which has been sug- ■«* chari-
gested, the common school did not become entirely ex- effort
tinct, during the century that intervened between the
surrender by the Dutch and the evacuation by British
troops, it is true that it came near to dissolution.
Whatever vitality inhered in it was due either to in-
12
Department of Public Instruction
Develop-
ment in
New Eng-
land and
New York
compared
apiration purely local or to organized charitable effort.
If two or three of the earlier royal governors exhibited
some interest in it, their successors betrayed none. It
was without system or supervision, sporadic instead of
general, and lacked conspicuously governmental sanc-
tion. Instances, however, occurred in which provincial
legislatures, Dutch in their majorities, strove strenu-
ously but ineffectually for its promotion as against the
prerogative of the executive ; a bill was proposed in the
assembly of 1G91 " to appoint a schoolmaster for the
educating and instructing of children and youth to
read and write English, in every town in the province,"
which came to naught. A paragraph in a letter of
President Johnson of Kings college, to Archbishop
Se; kei\ in April 1702. is worth quoting. Eeferring to
the illiberality of the New York colonial authorities
concerning educational grants he says: " It is a great
pity when patents are granted, as they often are. for
large tracts of land, no provision is made for religion
or schools. I wish therefore, instructions were given to
our governors never to grant patents for townships, or
villages, or large manors, without obliging the patentees
to sequester a competent portion for the subject of reli-
gion and education." The wish of the good president
was not realized. The English had no elementary school
system in England, and their government had no obj< I
in constructing one here. The English aristocracy,
transplanted to and perpetuated in New York, was at
one with royal authority in refusing to favor — indeed, in
opposing actively — popular education. In its esteem,
education was for the classes, not for the masses. For
its rising generations, were fireside homilies, private
tutelage and the training schools and universities of
England and, from the middle of the eighteenth cen-
tury, the colonial granimer school and college.
It is. at this time, in the comparison, that New
England becomes the superior of New York in the
development of the common school. The Puritans were
unlike the English who directed the course of the royal
government in New York. They were of the same
stamp as the men of Naseby and the Long Parliament.
They were independent and democratic. If they were
somewhat slow in breaking away from English preced-
ent and thus failed in the initiative which the Dutch
assumed, their pioneer conditions induced them to the
departure, as they also led them to separate from the
A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 13
church of England and to prescribe the Congregational
communion. If they first set up the college and the
secondary school, they later started the elementary
school as the sentiment of the people asserted itself,
and the common school once sanctioned was not per-
mitted to decay; it was resolutely and consistently
maintained.
Three acts comprehend all that the colonial legis ^g'sfative
lature of New York did for education from 1664 to acts of a
century
1775; none of these related to the elementary school;
two were in behalf of the grammar, or high school, and
one was the appropriation to Kings college of certain
moneys derived from public lottery and the excise reve-
nue. On the 27th of November, 1702, an act for the
encouragement of a grammar free school was passed
and approved by the governor and council. It provided
for the appointment by the governor, on the recom-
mendation of the common council of the city, of a
schoolmaster who should instruct the male children of
French, Dutch and English parents in the English,
Latin and Greek tongues, and also in the arts of reading
and writing and that he should be paid the sum of £50
annually to be raised by taxation for a term of seven
years. Under it, Mr. George Morrison, who seems to
have been fairly successful in his calling, was commis-
sioned and the school expired by limitation of the term.
It was not until 1732 that the legislature took further
action concerning secondary education. On the 14th of
October in that year it passed "an act to encourage a
public school in the city of New York for teaching
Latin, Greek and mathematics," which was assented to
by the governor and was, in several respects, an admir-
able measure. It appointed, as master, Alexander Mal-
colm, who had already afforded commendable proof of
his abilities as a private preceptor, at an annual salary
of £40 for a term of seven years, to be paid from the
fund accruing from licenses issued to hawkers and ped-
dlers and it distributed free scholarships to twenty
youths from the various counties, to be named by the
respective authorities of each in the following propor-
tions : to New York ten, to Albany two, and to
Kings, Queens, Suffolk, Richmond, Orange, Ulster and
Dutchess each one. The school was in operation eight
years, when it was discontinued, and, thereafter, sec-
ondary education, throughout the province, depended
upon individual benefaction and patronage. The two
14
Department of Public Instruction
Snmmary
prior to
the state-
hood of
New York
First
attention
to higher
education
The Re-
gents of
the Uni-
versity
acts have been cited, as the revelation, among other
things, that for a time, at least, the law-making body
regarded the high school as a public charge, setting an
example, which modern legislation has largely followed ;
and the grammar school could not have been considered,
as it was in some of the colonies, a mere tender of the
college, because it was more than twenty years after
the second law was enacted that the college was char-
tered.
The review of education in New York, prior to the
revolutionary war. is necessarily fragmentary and im-
perfect, if not baffling, owing to the scantiness of the
records, but from them the primacy of the Dutch in in-
augurating the common school, its continuance by vari-
ous expedients, weakening with the passing of the years,
the rise and decadence of the public grammar school,
the licensing of select and fostering of charity schools
and the founding of the college appear with sufficient
distinctness to warrant the statement that the line of
popular instruction was never entirely broken. With
independence and statehood, New York soion became
prominent in the onward movement of education and
her leadership has since been as pronounced as was the
original impulse of the colony from which she sprung.
As a state, however, she gave her first attention to
higher and not to elementary education, according in
this respect with the English provincial policy, her
statesmen also who were fashioning the commonwealth
being mindful of the conception of a university which
Diderot and other French philosophers had enunciated
in their writings. In response, therefore, to the appeal,
which Governor George Clinton addressed to the legis-
lature that convened immediately after the close of the
revolutionary war; an act was passed, on the first of
May, 1784, which vested in a corporation, The Regents
of the University of the State of New York, all the
rights, privileges, and immunities that had inhered in
the governors of Kings college, which had been seriously
embarrassed in its conduct and property by the war
and the reorganization of which was urgently de-
manded. The act also empowered the regents to found
schools and colleges in any part of the state and to
endow the same. The regents comprised the governor,
lieutenant governor, president of the senate, speaker of
the assembly, attorney-general, the mayors of New York
and Albany, twenty-four persons named from the eleven
A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 15
counties, and others selected by the clergy of the re-
spective religious denominations, one from each body.
On the 2(Jth of November, 1784, the act was amended by
adding to the number of regents thirty-three others
specifically named and providing that a quorum for the
transaction of business should be nine, including the
presiding officer — the chancellor. The board thus con-
stituted was a cumbrous body (sixty-four, exclusive of
the clerical representatives), was widely scattered and
manifestly incompetent to perform its functions as
trustees of the college.
It soon recognized its own deficiencies and the neces-
sity for remedial measures. A duly appointed com-
mittee, upon which were Alexander Hamilton and Ezra
L'Hommedieu, justly accredited as the authors of the
university system that has since obtained, presented a
report, which the board adopted, in which the defects
of the law were clearly set forth and a plan of reorgani-
zation was outlined. In this report a pregnant para-
graph occurs which shows the appreciation entertained
by the board of the obligation of the state to general as
well as to higher education. This is its expression:
"But before your committee conclude, they feel them-
selves bound in faithfulness to add that the erecting of
public schools for teaching reading, writing and arith-
metic is an object of very great importance, which ought
not to be left to the discretion of private men. but be
promoted by public authority. Of so much knowledge,
no citizen ought to be destitute, and yet it is a reflection,
as true as it is painful, that but too many of our youth
are brought up in utter ignorance." The main recom-
mendations oif the committee were embodied in a bill,
which became a law. on the 13th of November, 1787,
and has remained substantially unchanged, except as
the jurisdiction of the university has, from time to time,
been enlarged, partly by force of the original measure
and partly by special statutes, its field of work now in-
cluding not only academies, colleges, professional and
technical schools, but also libraries, museums, study
clubs, extension teaching and similar agencies for home
education. The law of 1787, repealing the prior acts
relating to the university and directing the separate
government of Kings, in it styled Columbia, college, cre-
ated a body of twenty-one regents, of whom the gover-
nor and lieutenant governor, for the time being, were
two. In 1842 and 1854 respectively, the secretary of
16 Department of Public Instruction,
state and the superintendent of public instruction were-
made members ex officio, thus increasing the board to
twenty-three. The remaining nineteen were named, to
serve without compensation, their successors, as resig-
nations or deaths should occur, to be elected by and to
hold office during the pleasure of the legislature — a life
tenure.
rowers of The regents were empowered to charter colleges and
regents to incorporate academies and to have supervision over
the same, being authorized and required to visit and in-
spect them, examine into the condition of education
and the discipline therein and to make an annual re-
port thereof to the legislature. They were to have au-
thority to confer degrees above that of master of arts
and to apply their estate and funds in such manner as,
in their judgment, should be most conducive to the pro-
motion of literature and the advancement of useful
knowledge. In 1894, they were made a constitutional
bi i ly, to be governed and its corporate powers exercised
by regents whose number shall not be less than nine.
By the legislation of this year, their number has been
reduced to eleven, with tenures of eleven years each.
The reorganized board is 117 years old, has been com-
ponent, of many distinguished, and some illustrious,
citizens, has uniformly been well officered, and has dis-
charged its duties intelligently and efficiently. It has
an honorable history and a wide jurisdiction — a juris-
diction, however, which is limited by the sphere of the
voluntary principle. It has had no connection with tax-
supported education, except as it distributed the income
of the literature fund and certain appropriations, by
virtue of recent enactment, and visited and inspected
high schools and academic departments of union
schools. This exception, which was an anomaly, oc-
curred by the resolution of these from the academies
and by implication to those originally of public found-
ation; but it has been set aside and supervision
over tax-supported secondary education vested in
the Commissioner of Education to whom it properly
belongs.
(ioTemor The first official utterance in favor of common schools
cun'on the iu t nis state — that of the committee of the regents in
tne n c d om-° f 1787 — ^as keen heretofore quoted. The regents re-
inon school newed their recommendation to this effect in their
state 1 " * e several reports to the legislature in 1793, 1794 and 1795.
A REVIEW OF ITS VDMINISTRATION 17
But it was the behest of Governor George Clinton,
more than any other persuasion, that induced the legis-
lature to lay the foundations of the common school
in this commonwealth. George Clinton, soldier of the
revolution, statesman of the republic and the first, and
for over twenty years, chief magistrate of the state of
New York, had a keen appreciation of all that enured
to its upbuilding. He was solicitous for its inter-
ests and jealous of any invasion of its rights. His
sturdy opposition to the ratification by New York of
the federal constitution, because he believed that by it
the state surrendered to the general government rights
which it should have reserved unto itself, is explicable
by his zeal in its behalf, his devotion to its autonomy,
its welfare and its glory; and he certainly regarded
the education of its youth as essential to these ends.
It was at his suggestion that the University was in-
corporated, as also that, in 1789, two lots, in each town-
ship, of the public land thereafter to be surveyed was
set apart for gospel and school purposes : and, in his
annual message of 1795, are these memorable words:
" While it is evident that the general establishment
and liberal endowments of academies are highly to be
commended, and are attended with the most beneficial
consequences, yet, it cannot be denied that they are
principally confined to the children of the opulent, and
that a great portion of the community is excluded from
their immediate advantage. The establishment of com-
mon schools throughout the state is happily calculated
to remedy this inconvenience, and will, therefore, en-
gage your early and decided consideration." In con-
formity with this injunction, " an act for the encour- The first
agement of schools" in that year provided that **1 islatlve
£20,000 should be annually appropriated for five
years "for the purpose of encouraging and maintain-
ing schools in the several cities and towns in this state,
in which the children of the inhabitants residing in
the state shall be instructed in the English language,
or be taught English grammar, arithmetic, mathematics
and such other branches of knowledge as are most
useful and necessary to complete a good English edu-
cation." The act regulated the quota by counties but,
beyond this, the apportionment was made on the basis
of the taxable inhabitants, and the supervisors of the
counties were required to raise by tax in each town a
sum equal to half of that received from the state.
2
1& Dbpartmknt op Public Instruction
Provision was made for the supervision of the schools
and for annual reports. Returns from sixteen out of
the twenty-three counties, for the year 1798, show that
1,352 schools were then organized in which 59,660
children were taught. The law expired by its own limi-
tation in 1800. In 1801 an enactment for the raising
by lotteries of the sum of $100,000 was made. $12,500
thereof were to be paid to the regents, by them to
be distributed to the academies and the remaining
$87,500 were to be deposited in the treasury, to be
disposed of for the benefit of the common schools in
such manner as the legislature should determine. The
comptroller was directed subsequently to invest the pro-
ceeds in real estate. The principal responsibility for
this act and for certain laudable attempts at educa-
tional legislation, during the next few years, is ascribed
to Jedediah Peck and Adam Comstock, who served
together for an extended period in the assembly and
senate and who were not liberally educated men, but
notably sagacious, diligent and patriotic. The lot-
teries, w T hich now seem an exceedingly objectionable
device for advancing the cause, for which they were
utilized, but which public sentiment then approved,
were known as " literature lotteries " and existed until
1821 when, by the constitution, all lotteries w r ere pro-
hibited.
Land* de- Nothing further was accomplished, although Gov-
■chooi »ur- ornors Jay, Clinton and Lewis successfully recoin-
po " e * mended action, until 1805, when the Legislature
ordained that 500,000 acres of the vacant and unappro-
priated lands of the state should be sold and the avails
made a permanent school fund, when the interest
thereon should amount to $50,000. In 1811, Governor
Tompkins again called attention to the subject, and
he w r as authorized to appoint five commissioners to
report a plan for the organization and establishment
of common schools. He named, as such commissioners,
Jedediah Peck, John Murray, jr., Samuel Russell,
Roger Skinner and Samuel Macomb, who, on the 14th
of February, 1812, submitted a report, accompanied by
the draft of a bill, which in the law adopted during
the legislative session of that year became one of the
most momentous steps ever taken in educational prog-
ress, here or elsewhere.
The outlines of the plan, as sketched by the com-
missioners, were these : " That the several towns in*tbe
A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 19
state be divided into school districts, by three com*
missioners, elected by the citizens qualified to vote for
town officers; that three trustees be elected in each
district, to whom shall be confided the care and super-
intendence of the school to be established therein; that
the interest of the school fund be divided among the
different counties and towns, according to their respec-
tive population, as ascertained by the successive cen-
suses of the United States; that the proportions re-
ceived by the respective towns be subdivided among
the districts into which such towns shall be divided,
according to the number of children in each, between
the ages of five and fifteen years ; that each town raise
by tax annually as much money as it shall have re-
ceived from the school funds; that the gross amount
of monejs received from the state and raised by the
towns be appropriated exclusively to the payment of
the wages of the teachers; and that the whole system
be placed under the superintendence of an officer ap-
pointed by the Council of Appointment."
It is from this last mentioned article that New York The second
■••i t • ednca-
derives her second educational primacy, in a state sys- tionai pri-
tem with a single responsible head. Its wisdom has been jJ , e a ^ y Yoru
vindicated by the experience of ninety years, and her
leading therein has been followed by every state in the
union. In some other respects, the commissioners ad-
mit that from the common school systems of neighbor-
ing states they had gathered much important informa-
tion, but in this respect they learned nothing from
others. They created. One section of the law, that
which made it optional with a town to comply with, or
to forego the advantages and avoid the burdens of the
act, was soon seen to need modification ; and, in the
second year of its operation, it was, upon the suggestion
of the superintendent, made obligatory. The adminis-
tration of the new svstem was confided to Gideon Haw- The admin.
• i istration
ley, as superintendent of common schools, who proved of Gideon
to be admirably adapted to his work. He had a genius HaTFley
for organization, was broad-minded and of quick sym-
pathies, patient in matters of detail and of shining in-
tegrity of character. He was to New York, what
Horace Mann was to Massachusetts and Henry Barnard
was to Connecticut, both an inspirer and a guide. He
was. as he has often been called, the father of the com-
mon school system in the state. Born in Huntington,
Connecticut, September 26, 1785, he became, when nine
L!0 Department of Public Instruction
years old, a resident of Saratoga county. He was gradu-
ated from Union college in 1809, studied law and was
practicing in Albany, when on the 14th of January,
1813, he was elected superintendent. He retained office
until February 22, 1821, meanwhile having been ap-
pointed secretary of the regents, March 25, 1814, and
continuing as such until 1841. In 1842 he was made a
regent and served in that capacity until his death in
Albany, July 17, 1870, in the eighty-fifth year of his age.
Xo man has had a longer association, a more intimate
acquaintance with, nor a deeper and more salutary in-
fluence upon, our educational affairs than he. His name
deserves to be held in lasting remembrance. Xo state-
ment of the achievements of his administration could be
more perspicuous than that which he modestly ascribes
to the inherent quality of the system itself, in his sixth
annual report, in 1819, where he says: '"The same data
also afford evidence that common schools have risen in
public estimation, and received a degree of care and at-
tention to their concerns, corresponding with their in-
crease and prosperity. If these results were the only
evidence of a beneficial operation in the system of com-
mon schools provided by law, they would be sufficient
to establish the public confidence in the policy of thai
system, and to secure it a permanent duration. But it
is well known, although it does not appear from any
data in the returns, that the system has produced other
results noit less in magnitude or merit. It has secured
our schools against the admission of unqualified
teachers, by requiring them to submit to examination
before a public board of inspectors, and to obtain from
them a certificate of approbation, before they can
legally be employed. It has imparted to common
schools a new and more respectable character by making
them a subject of legal notice, and investing them with
powers to regulate their own concerns. It has corrected
many evils in the discipline and government of schools,
not only by excluding unqualified teachers, but by sub-
jecting the schools and course of studies in them to the
frequent inspection of public officers. It has founded
schools in places where, by conflicting interests or warn
of concert in the inhabitants, none had been before es-
tablished; and, it has. by its pecuniary aid, enabled
many indigent children to receive the benefits of educa-
tion which would not otherwise have been within their
reach." In 1821, when Superintendent Hawley retired.
A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 21
there were 6,323 organized school districts, from 5,489
of which reports had been made, showing that 317,633
children had been under instruction during that year,
that the public bounty was sufficient to defray the ex-
penses of the schools, for about three months in each
year and that in most of the districts poor children
were enabled to attend school free of charge. It is in-
teresting to note that the unification of the educational
systems of the state was practically, if not nominally,
accomplished under Mr. Hawley, from the fact that he
was for seven years both superintendent of common
schools and secretary of the board of regents.
In 1805, an educational work was begun in the city sSfoor^si-
of New York and continued until 1853, to which, jg^Vork
although it did not come within the specific direction city
of the educational department of the state, reference
is here pertinent, because of the standing of the men
enlisted in it, the zeal with which it was prosecuted,
the good it wrought, and, more than all, the earnest
and even bitter controversy it inspired and the princi-
ple which the issue of that controversy confirmed. On
the 19th of February, 1805, twelve prominent citizens
of New York, impressed with the conviction that no
opportunity was afforded for the education of children,
outside the charitable and denominational schools, met
at the house of John Murray in Pearl street and ap-
pointed a committee to devise a plan of relief. The
report of the committee, sustained by hundreds of
signatures to a petition to the legislature, resulted in
a law of the same year entitled "An act to incorporate
the society instituted in the city of New York for the
establishment of a free school for the education of
poor children who do not belong 1<>. or are not pro-
vided for, by any religious society.'' Its income was
restricted to |10,000 and the annual membership fee
was fixed at eight dollars, but members contributing
$25 were privileged to send one and those contribut-
ing $ 40 two children to any school under its care. The
number of trustees was thirteen, increased from time
to time until it reached LOO. In all 434 persons served
in this capacity. l>e\Yi11 Clinton was the first presi-
dent continuing as such until his death in 1828. In
1808, the name was changed i<> I he Free School
Society of New York, and its scope enlarged " to all
children who are the proper subjects of a gratuitous
education.'' In 1826, the corporation was styled " The
22 Department of Public Instruction
Public School Society of New York " and the trustees
were authorized to provide for the education of all
children in the city of New York not otherwise pro-
vided for "whether such children be or be not the proper
objects of gratuitous education, and without regard to
the religious sect or denomination to which such
children or their parents may belong ; " and to require
from those attending the schools a moderate compensa-
tion ; but no child to be refused admission on account
of inability to pay. The pay system was, however,
abolished in 1832. At the outset subscriptions were
obtained and on the 19th day of May, 1806, the first
school was opened. In 1807 an appropriation of $1,000
was made by the legislature toward erecting a house
and $1,000 were directed to be paid annually for defray-
ing the expenses of the school. The city also gave a
building and $500 for repairing it, on condition that
the society should teach fifty almshouse children.
State and municipal aid thus began ; grant succeeded
grant; and the schools became public to all intents and
purposes, although under the control of a private cor-
poration. In 1813 the legislature ordained that that
portion of the school moneys apportioned to and raised
in the city of New York should be distributed " to the
trustees of the Free School Society, the Orphan Asylum
Society, the African Free School and the trustees of
such incorporated religious societies in said city as now
support, or hereafter shall establish, charity schools
within the said city, who may apply for the same." The
distribution was to be limited strictly to the payment
of teachers' wages. In 1824 the common council was
authorized to designate the societies and schools which
should receive the school moneys, and thereafter nearly
nine-tenths of the amount thereof was dispensed to and
expended by the Public School Society which, at the
time, had six schools, with an attendance of over 5,000
pupils.
The de- In the initial appeal of that society for means with
the «ie- which to prosecute its work, it was stated that it would
«onai a " be " a primary object, without observing the peculiar
■chooia forms of any religious society, to inculcate the divine
truths of religion and morality contained in the Holy
Scriptures," and the reading of the King James version
of the Bible and lessons thence drawn were prescribed
In the curriculum. By many, this was construed as
rendering the schools denominational and the demand,
A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 28
as a claim in equity, for a portion of the school moneys
was pressed by pronounced sectarian schools and the
objection was also urged that it was undemocratic and
inimical to the spirit of our free institutions that a
private corporation should have the management of
schools sustained almost wholly by appropriations from
the public treasury. The agitation thus engendered
waxed fast and furious for many years, extending
beyond the metropolis through the state, eliciting in
behalf of the distribution of school moneys among the
sects the voice of Archbishop Hughes and the pen of
McMaster of the Freeman's Journal and the mes-
sages of Governor Seward, and against it the speeches
of Theodore Sedgwick, Hiram Ketchum, Gardiner
Spring and other distinguished protagonists of the
Public Society in its favor, while John C. Spencer, secre-
tary of state, wrote a notable weighty and luminous
report against the policy of an educational system in
the hands of a private corporation, rather than in those
of the people, describing it as foreign to the feelings,
habits and usages of our citizens, and proposing the
organization of a board, by the popular suffrage, that
should have charge of all school interests, the public
moneys to be paid to and by it disbursed.
The result was the passage of a law on the 9th of Yoru" *Tty
April, 1842, entitled "An act to extend to the city and {^u«itto H
county of New York the provisions of the general act
in relation to common schools." It provided for the
election of commissioners, inspectors and trustees by
wards, the resolution of the commissioners into the
board of education, the raising by general tax of funds
for the maintenance of the schools, the placing of the
Public School Society and several charitable educa-
tional institutions under the jurisdiction of the board,
they to be classed, in the distribution of school moneys,
as district schools of the city, and it was ordained
that no school in which any sectarian doctrine or tenet
was taught or practiced should receive any part of the
school moneys. Eleven years later the Public School
Society surrendered to the Board of Education all its
property, real and personal, valued at $454,421.85, in-
cluding seventy-eight schools, and with the introduc-
tion into that board of fifteen commissioners of its
selection, its efficient, and, in many respects, commend-
able and honorable service of forty-eight years ended.
24 Department of Public Instruction
The secre- when Gideon Hawley was retired, he had laid
sfate °be- broadly and deeply the foundations of a symmetrical
perintend- educational structure; had secured ju . n •
common ments to the educational statutes ; b
schools stantially shaped the codification of 1819, which u
no essential changes in the machinery of the school.-.
and had accompanied its publication with an exposi-
tion of its provisions and forms for proceedings
under it; had seen the proportion of children
attending school increase from 4-5 to 24-25 of
those of school age; the average time the schools
were kept open lengthen in about the same ratio,
and the principal of the common school fund appreci-
ate from $822,064.74 to $1,185,641.98. Welcome E
was appointed successor to Mr. Hawley. but his term
w T as brief. Within less than throe months, the super-
intendency, as a separate department of the govern-
ment was abolished and its duties were relegated to the
secretary of state, who was elected for a term of three
years by joint ballot of the senate and assembly. John
tration^of VanXess Yates was the first incumbent. Coincident
Ness' Ya a t"s with the new order, was the article in the constitution
to the effect that all lands thereafter sold should con-
stitute a perpetual fund, the interest of which should
be inviolably appropriated and applied to the sn
of the common schools throu state — a solemn
pledge in the organic low which, renewed in 1846 and
1894, has been observed faithfully. In 1S22, the secre-
tary was invested with appellate jurisdiction over all
controversies arising under the school laws and his
decision thereon made final, a power which since uni-
formly inhering in the head of the school department
has been of signal advantage to its coherence, efficiency
and authority and has relieved the courts of litiga-
tion much of which would have been annoying and
burdensome. On the 12th of January, 1825, Mr. Yates
transmitted his last annual report to the legislature,
from which it appears that 402,940 children had been
taught, for an average period of nine months, during
the preceding year, the number of districts was 7,<>42
from 6,936 of which reports had been received, and the
aggregate amount of teachers' wages in the reporting
districts was $182,741.61.
A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION -
Azariah C. Flagg was appointed secretary of state f r * 1 t n i *," ,s „"f
February 14, 1826, and served until February 1, 1833. Azariah c
The annual message of Governor DeWitt Clinton, in
1826, was remarkable for its intelligent discussion of
educational subjects and its liberal recommendations
in behalf of the common schools, and especially in that
it proposed a seminary for the preparation of teachers
and state visitation of the schools, which was reiterated
in 1827 and 1828, both of which, subsequently embraced
in our educational system, have been among its most
effective agencies for good. The message of the gover-
nor elicited from the literature committee of the senate
a report, of which John C. Spencer was the author, that
urged the adoption of the scheme of county supervision,
inspection and licensing of teachers, but concluded that,
for the time being, owing to economical considerations,
the colleges and academies must suffice as nurseries of
teachers, advising, however, that the income of the
literature fund should be divided among these, by the
regents, in proportion to the number of scholars pursu-
ing English, as well as that of those engaged in classi-
cal studies; and the committee was unable to discover
why, upon principles of justice and public policy, insti-
tutions for females should not participate equally with
those for males in the public bounty. In 1S27, Mr.
Spencer made a second report of similar tenor to the
first, and framed a bill, which became a law, entitled
"An act to provide permanent funds for the annual ap-
ool and
rature
ture fund, and to promote the education of teachers," "^Ji*
which, after transferring certain state moneys to the
common school and literature funds respectively, di-
rected that the income of the latter should be dis-
tributed among the incorporated academies and semi-
naries, other than colleges, subject to the visitation of
the regents, in proportion to the number of pupils in-
structed in each academy or seminary for six months
during the preceding year, who shall have pursued
either classical studies, or the higher branches of Eng-
lish education, or both.
Secretary Flagg advocated consistently the founding The i>e S -i»-
of distinct institutions for the instruction of teachers, normal
In his report of 1830, he alludes approvingly to a aclxoal
memorial presented to the legislature at its preceding
session, from a committee of the citizens of Rochester,
asking for the establishment of a state seminary for
•JG Department of Public Instruction
teachers and a central school in each town. The de-
mand for such a seminary had already become pro-
nounced in several northern states. So early as 1789, it
had been intimated in an essay in the Massachusetts
Magazine. Professor Denison Olmstead, of Yale col-
lege, in an address at New Haven, in 1816, had advo-
cated it eloquently. Professor Kingsley, of Yale college,
favored it in an article in the Xorth American Review
in 1828. James G. Carter, who is called the " father of
the normal schools" in the United States, described its
principal features in a series of papers in the Boston
Patriot in 1825; it was emphasized by the Rev. Thomas
H. Gallaudet in 1825, and, in the same year, Walter R.
Johnson, of Germantown, Pa., issued a pamphlet, philo-
sophical in its affirmance of the proposition, that at-
tracted wide assent from educators, while, in 1833,
President Junkin, of Lafayette, and President Golton,
of Bristol college, pressed it upon the Pennsylvania
legislature. In 183G Professor Calvin E. Stowe, at the
request of the legislature of Ohio, visited the Prussian
normal schools and, in his report to that body, advised
it to incorporate similar schools — a report which was
republished by order of the legislatures of Massachu-
setts, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Virginia, and North
Carolina respectively. Honor to whom honor is due. If
Massachusetts, impelled by the enthusiasm of Horace
Mann, did erect, in 1839, the first normal school in the
country, neither the thought of DeWitt Clinton, in 1826, )
nor the plea of Azariah C. Flagg, in 1830, should be for-
gotten. When Secretary Flagg left his office, in 1833, to
become comptroller, the number of districts was 9,600
and of children taught therein 491,459, being an in-
crease of 195S and 91,519 respectively over those last re-
ported by Secretary Yates. The amount of public
money expended for payment of teachers' wages had
risen* to $305,572.78 of which $100,000 came from the
common school fund.
A.iminis- John A. Dix, who filled many state and national posi-
joni"^.. tions, including those of United States senator, secre-
tary of the treasury, minister to France, governor and
major-general during the civil war, with eminent credit
and usefulness, was appointed secretary of state Febru-
ary 1, 1833, and served until February 4, 1839. As such,
not less than in his other public capacities, he displayed
his civic worth. He was loyal to the cause of education
and, under him, school affairs were prudently and
Dix
A REVTEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 27
wisely ordered, salutary reforms were accomplished and
decided progress was made. In 1835, the foundations
of the district school library were laid by an act au-
thorizing the taxable inhabitants of the several school
districts to levy a tax, not exceeding twenty dollars for
the first year and ten dollars for each succeeding year,
"for the purchase of a district library, consisting of
such books as they shall in their district meeting
direct."
The first step taken by New York for the profes j£SS
sional education of teachers was the Act of May 2, ™% n J; ci j£.
1834. This act provided for a "normal department" in emie.
one academy, in each of the eight judicial districts, ap-
propriating to each $500 for the purchase of apparatus,
maps, charts and globes, and $400 annually for teachers.
Each of these schools was to have a local "board of visi-
tors" who were to report the results of their inspection
to the secretary of state.
Secretary Dix was not in accord with the effort in
behalf of seminaries exclusively for teachers and, on the
5th of January. 183G, as chairman of the committee of
the regents to prepare a. plan for the better education
of teachers, held that the organization of a teachers'
department in one academy in each of the eight sena-
torial districts would supply the existing need, and that
each such academy should receive annually from the
literature fund $400 to that end. His report was
adopted and the academies were designated by the re-
gents.
On the 0th of May of the same year, Prosper M. ft • r "*"" 1 "
Wetmore, chairman of the literature committee of unification
the assembly, and then and for many years there-
after a regent of the university, made to the assembly
an exhaustive report in favor of the establishment
of a separate "Department of Public Instruction"
in charge of an officer to be known as "Secretary of
Public Instruction," who should possess all the func-
tions of the Superintendent of Common Schools and
also be ex officio Chancellor of the University, with the
colleges and academies, as well as common schools, sub-
ject to his visitation. Nothing practical came of this
program of unification, but it may not be, even at this
day, unworthy of consideration. In his annual message
for 1837, Governor Marey recommended the transfer of
the general superintendence and supervision of the
academies frorn the regents to the secretary of state, as
28 Department of I'jjijuc Instruction
superintendent. No legislative action was had upon
this proposition, but it is in evidence as the revelation
that one of the ablest statesmen and executives that
New York has produced believed that the conduct of
secondary education inheres properly in the superin-
tendent of public instruction rather than in the regents.
The governor in his message, a year later, maintained
that the designated academies were inadequate to sup-
ply the needed teachers and suggested the institution of
county normal schools. In 1838, the sum of $100,000
was added, from the revenue of the United States de-
posit fund, to that of the common school fund, making
a total of f275,000 of which $55,000 was set apart for
the purchase of books annually for district libraries
and the remainder for teachers' wages. An equal
amount was also to be levied upon the people for the
same purpose. In his last annual report, in 1839, the
secretary stated that there were 10,583 organized school
districts and 528.913 children were taught therein — an
increase of 983 and 31.051 respectively during his
tenure. The amount paid for teachers' wages had
reached $335,882.92.
Atiminis- Another of the great men of New York, John C.
jo^mVc. Spencer, who served the commonwealth in both
spencer branches of the legislature and the nation in the house
of representatives and in two seats in the cabinet, suc-
ceeded John A. Dix as secretary, in 1839, and remained
until October 12, 1811, when, upon his becoming secre-
tary of war, the duties of superintendent devolved upon
the General Deputy, Samuel S. Randall, who discharged
them until February 7, 1S12. Mr. Spencer was a man of
acute intellect and disciplined faculties, exact in
thought and vigorous in expression, tenacious of his
views, and his administration was marked not less by
the discussion of policies than by real reforms effected.
As already indicated, he was deeply interested in the
determination of the management of and appropria-
tions for schools in New York city and was strenuously
opposed to the introduction of normal schools, but as
strenuously urged the increase of the number of acade-
mies in which teachers should be instructed.
county an- i n 1S40 the "board of visitors" at Mount Morris, in
ents their report, recommended a "state seminary devoted
exclusively to the training of teachers." By an ordi-
nance of the regents, of the 4th of May, 1811, apportion-
ments were made to two academies in each senatorial
A i;i:yii:\y of its administration 20
district, and, in addition, seven oilier academies were
given $700 each from the literature fund for that pur-
pose. On the 26th of May, the legislature passed an act,
drafted by Mr. Spencer, providing for the appointment,
biennially, by each board of supervisors, of a superin-
tendent charged, as the title implies, with general cure
of the schools within his county and the hearing of ap-
peals. This office, the propriety of which was in issue
from first to last, existed less than seven years, being
abolished on the 13th of November, 1847. It had its
ardent champions, as it still has, being sanctioned in
several states, and its severe critics who constantly
labored for its overthrow. By its friends, it was re-
garded as a necessary link between the town and dis-
trict officials and the state bureau, as relieving the
latter of much of petty details and trivial disputes, and
as promoting the unity of the school system and an
esprit de corps among its servants. Its foes objected to
the method of appointment, by boards of supervisors not
conversant with school mailers and more or less actu-
ated in their choice by political motives and expedien-
cies, and they also exaggerated the pecuniary burden
imposed upon the localities which were constrained to
pay one-half of the salary of the county superintendent.
Continual assaults finally prevailed against it, notwith-
standing the adherence to it of the state department and
a large majority of prominent educators. Upon the
whole, it worked well, especially as an intermediary be-
tween the town commissioners and the secretary, and,
save in rare cases, it did not lack faithful and enlight-
ened administration. On the 5th of January, 1842,
Vcting Superintendent Randall transmitted to the legis-
lature his annual report, from which it appears that,
exclusive of the city of New York, 603,583 children Avere
taught in 10,886 districts reporting, an increase of 303
and 74,670 respectively since the retirement of Secre-
tary Dix. The amount received from the state by the
schools, including the revenue from the United States
deposit fund was $65S,954.70.
Samuel Young became secretary of state and head Adminis-
of the common school system, February 7, 1842. Dm- sVnmJi °
ing a long political career, he held many offices of dig Youns
nity and trust — judge of Saratoga county, delegate to
the constitutional convention of 1821, assemblyman
three years and speaker one, canal commissioner, regent
of the university from 1817 until 1825, and state sen-
SO Dotaktmbnt of Public Instruction
ator for twelve years. He was also an unsuccessful
candidate for governor, by a narrow margin of votes,
against DeWitt Clinton in 1S24. He was not, when
chosen secretary, regarded as especially well versed in
common srhool matters, but he brought to their con-
sideration habits of close investigation, eminent clarity
and rectitude of judgment, and an earnest resolution
to guard and advance their interests. No reports of
any superintendent are characterized by a more lucid
perception of educational needs, a more catholic recep-
tion of new ideas, in several instances reversing his pre-
conceived notions, a more intimate acquaintance with
the details of management, or a more candid and forc-
ible style of presenting his conclusions ; and the normal
school and teachers' institute are greatly indebted to
him — the one for its establishment and the other for the
encouragement given to its inception. The persuasive
impetus to the being of the normal school in this state
seems to have emanated from a convention of county
superintendents at Utica, in 1842, before which the Rev.
Alonzo Potter, D.D., then professor of mathematics in
Union college and later the Protestant Episcopal
bishop of Pennsylvania, Horace Mann and others
advocated the project and the convention, by resolu-
tion, approved it cordially. At a like convention, the
ensuing year, similar indorsement was made. Secre-
tary Young, in his report in 1843, declared that the
teachers' departments in the academies were not ful-
filling their design " because the bounty of the state
was diffused over too wide a surface, and recommended
their reduction to four and the appropriation of a sum
sufficient to establish and maintain a normal school
at the state capital."
The Hui- In 1844, decisive action was had. The Honorable
port Jn" Calvin T. Hulburd, chairman of the assembly coin-
■eiloou mittee on colleges, academies and common schools, who
had visited the several normal schools of Massachusetts
and had familiarized himself with their methods and
had also collected statistics concerning the operation of
such schools in Prussia and other European countries,
made, on the 22d of March, an exhaustive report upon
the subject, which remains a monument of patient
labor, valuable information and sagacious direction.
Few educational papers have excelled it, either in the
knowledge it imparts, or the worth of its counsel. It
is still frequently referred to. The following passage
A BBVIBW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION il
will bear quoting, especially as emphasizing the pre-
scient spirit that informs it throughout : " It will be
noticed that the committee speak of the establishment
of one normal school : Did our present means seem to
warrant it, the committee would, with confidence,
recommend the immediate establishment of at least one
in each of the eight senatorial districts. If one is now
established, and that is properly endowed and organ-
ized, there cannot be a doubt that not only one will
be called for in each of the eight senatorial districts,
but in a brief period very many of the large counties
will insist upon having one established within their
limits. The establishment of one is but an experi-
ment — if that can be called an experiment, which for
more than a century has been in operation, without
a known failure, which, if successful, will lead the way
for several others. * * * The committee believe
the experiment should be tried at the capital; if it can-
not be tested in the presence of all the people, it should
be before all the representatives of the people. As a
government measure, it is untried in this state; the
result, therefore, will be of deep interest. Here at each
annual session of the legislature, can be seen for what
and how the public money is expended ; here can be
seen the exhibition of the pupils of the seminary and
the model school; here, if unsuccessful, no report of
interested officials can cover up its failures, or prevent
the abandonment of the experiment ; here citizens from
all parts of the state, who resort to the capital during
the session of the legislature, the terms of the courts,
etc., can have an opportunity of examining the work-
ings of the normal school system; of learning the best
method of teaching, and all the improvements in the
science and practice of the art; those ^vho, in the spring
and autumn, pass through the city, and to and from
the great metropolis, and those who from all parts of
the union make their annual pilgrimage to the fountain
of health, will pause here to see what the Empire state
is doing to promote the education of her people."
With the report, Mr. Hulburd introduced a bill which. The Albany
earnestly supported by Michael Hoffman and other s
y the
schools of
the cities
materially modified since its original passage, the most
radical changes being the relief from tuition fees of
resident pupils in academical departments and the mak-
ing of tuition of nonresident pupils a state charge in
1903,
Among other recommedations embraced in Superin-
tendents Rice's first report were these: That district
school meetings should be held at a certain fixed and
uniform time; that there should , be a reduction of
local school officers; and, especially in line with the
views of his predecessors, that county superintendents
should be replaced in the school system, quoting, in this
connection, among those of several prominent educa-
tors, the words of Henry Barnard, in 1S45, who said :
"I have watched the progressive improvement in the
organization and the administration of the school sys-
tem of this (New York) great state, with intense in-
terest, and I regard it at this time as superior to any
other of which I have any knowledge. But the most
admirable feature in your school system is the pro-
vision for county superintendents. There is nothing to
be compared to this in the school system of any other
state. There is nothing in all the wise legislation of
your state in regard to public instruction unless, per-
haps, the liberal appropriation for district libraries,
wdiich the friends of public education elsewhere are so
anxious to see adopted into the school system of their
respective states."
As indicative of the standing the schools of the cities
had attained, the following extracts from Superintend-
ent Rice's second annual report, is taken : " The cities
have been especially favored by legislation. Their
schools are as free to every child as the air he breathes.
It is their mission to give a practical education alike
to the rich and the poor; and they are fulfilling it in a
manner creditable to their particular localities and to
the state. Thousands of parents have been induced to
remove from the rural districts for the purpose of edu-
cating their children in these schools. With one or
two exceptions, they are under a complete and thorough
supervision, which points out the most approved modes
of school architecture, secures competent teachers, and
incorporates into their plans of instruction every im-
provement of the day. How long the children of the
cities shall enjoy privileges so much superior to those
in other parts of the state remains for the legislature
A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 49
to determine. I have visited with their superin-
tendents some of the principal schools of New York and
Brooklyn, and have seen great multitudes of children
and youth congregated therein fitting themselves for
independence and extensive usefulness; some of whom,
were it not for the liberal provision for schools, would
be educated in the streets. Tax payers have long since
learned that they cannot afford to encourage the edu-
cation there acquired. Buffalo, Oswego, Rochester,
Syracuse, Auburn, Utica and other cities, are attracting
the wealth and intelligence of less favored portions of
the state in consequence of their excellent schools."
What may be called the beginning of compulsory educa-
tion in the state had been made by the law of 1853, by
which the municipalities were required to provide
industrial schools for children roaming the streets, but
its enforcement was attempted only in Rochester.
The last year of Superintendent Rice's first adminis- school
tration was signalized by the passage of two salutary sioneVs"
acts. The one, already alluded to, essential to the creMte « l
orderly supervision of the schools, was that by which
the office of commissioner was ordained, — the outcome
of an arduous battle against prejudice and parsimony.
The other was that levying a state tax of three-quarters ti.o ti«-ee-
of a mill upon the dollar in lieu of the imposition of S'miu *»"*
the gross sum of $S00,000— a bridge which the schools
traversed to the goal of freedom — resulting in 1857 in
the receipt of $1,073,768.97, a gain of $273,768.97, while
there was a diminution in rate bills from $161,779.13
in 1856 to $127,956.07. From the report of 1856, it is
learned that the principal of the common school fund
was $2,491,916.14. The total expenditures of the
schools for the preceding year were $3,544,587.62. For
teachers' wages $1,051,210.47 came from the state tax;
the amount from local taxes for city, village and union
free schools, where rate bills were dispensed with, was
$730,674.2S; the cost of schoolhouse sites was $57,-
839.15; of building schoolhouses, fences, etc., $381,-
101.88; of hiring schoolhouses $17,568.69; of repairs to
houses, fences and out-buildings $169,555.98; of book-
cases and furniture $50,781.97; and of libraries $50,-
801.50. Among the recommendations of Superintend-
ent Rice were the establishment of more normal schools;
a more liberal appropriation for teachers' institutes;
the naming of a uniform day for the holding of the
annual district meetings and the conforming of the
4
tendent
Van Dyclc
50 Dbpartment of I'unuc Instruction •
school year, to which (he additional returns of the dis-
trict relate, to the fiscal year of the state, the last two
recommendations being incorporated in chapter 151 of
the laws of 1858 by which it was enjoined that the
school year should begin on the first day of October and
end on the thirtieth day of September, and the annual
school meeting in each district should be held on the
second Tuesday of October.
Admits- Henry H. Van Dyck, who became superintendent
snperin- ' April 7, 1857, was a man of exact methods, and among
the first things he accomplished was a reform in the
bookkeeping of the Department. Having found that
the amount raised for school purposes, in 1855, was
apparently $221,537.64 in excess of that of 1856, and
having also noted other discrepancies in the records, he
concluded that the blank office forms were so con-
structed as to make it probable that some items of
expenditure were embraced under different headings,
so as to be doubled or trebled. Thus he made a change
in the blanks that led to a directness of statement that
precluded unintelligible duplications or careless omis-
sions; and, so far as he could, he compelled accuracy in
the reports of subordinate officers, in which, as he says,
he was assisted materially by the new scheme of local
supervision — the commissioners. It is well to state
here that, in the preparation of this review, difficulty
has been experienced in the examination of figures,
from the reports of town superintendents, often mani-
festly inaccurate and insufficient, and, sometimes, even
baffling. The attempt has been made throughout to
adjust and reconcile these, with, it is hoped, some
measure of success, and with results substantially cor-
rect, but, whatever errors have occurred, they are not
likely to be repeated in further details, and this largely
owing to the forms introduced by Superintendent Van
Djck. Otherwise, his administration was not marked
by radical departures either in methods or policies. He
was not disposed to suggest alterations in the laws
beyond certain simple amendments obviously neces-
sary to the public convenience, preferring rather to
realize the good possible under existing statutes than
to experiment with new ones. He contended that the
school system was not so much wanting in the facilities
for imparting instruction as in the indisposition of a
considerable portion of the population to utilize those
already available. He did not believe that compulsory
A ItEVlEW or ITS ADMINISTRATION f» 1
education could be enforced, but be t bought 1be desired
end could be promoted by a discrimination in the appli-
cation of state funds founded on the proportional num-
ber in actual attendance, upon the theory that such a
provision would give to each taxpayer a direct
pecuniary interest in securing the largest possible at-
tendance upon the schools, both as a means of securing
a larger share of the state bounty and as reducing local
taxation. The distribution of funds, which the super-
intendent thus inferentially criticised, was that of two-
thirds of the public money to a district, according to
the number of persons between the years of four and
twenty-one. In his report for 1859 (the last of his La«t re-
first term) Superintendent Van Dyck presents the fob van Dyou-.
lowing financial summary : *"* term
Receipts Cities Rural districts
Balance on hand October
1, 1858 ^332,314 01 $90,607 53
Amount received from
moneys apportioned by
state "superintendent... 378,416 45 944,266 88
Proceeds of gospel and
school lands 177 96 19,206 68
Amount raised by district
taxes 1,402,282 56 619,180 49
Amount raised by rate
bills 414,062 72
Amount received from all
other sources 9,618 59 46,609 21
Totals $2,122,810 57 $2,033,933 51
Total in cities 2,122,810 57
Total in state $4,156,744 08
Payments.
For teachers' wages $961,395 14 $1,481,989 66
Libraries 9,583 58 28,778 00
School apparatus 111,118 40 6,846 39
Colored schools 20,766 42 3,597 58
Expenses of schoolhouses,
viz. : sites, buildings, hir-
ing, purchasing, repair-
ing and insuring, fences,
outhouses, furniture, etc 440,961 75 283,330 72
52 Department of Public Instruction
Receipts Cities Rural districts
All other incidental ex-
penses $164,422 27 $152,027 66
Amount on hand October
1, 1859 414,563 01 77,563 50
Totals $2,122,810 57 $2,033,933 51
Total in cities 2,122,810 57
Total in state $4,156,744 08
Subtracting the amount on hand October 1, 1859, the
actual payments for school purposes during the twelve
months preceding were $3,644,617.57 — a liberality of ex-
penditure, as the superintendent observes, that indi-
cates unmistakably the deep interest felt by our citizens
in the cause of education.
\iii the odious rate bill shall no longer prevent children
from going to school; that the schools shall be as free
to all of proper age and condition as the air and sun-
light. ( Inferentially in all the Rice reports and speci-
fically in 1865, '66 and* '67.) This too came to pass
and that during the official life of its author. By the
A REVIEW OF ITS ADM INISTKATION 59
same law, taking effect October 1, 1867, that increased
state taxation for the schools, they became free in fact,
as well as in name, throughout the state, as they had
been, for years, in the cities. The rate bill was abol-
ished. This was a glorious consummation. The blot
upon the 'scutcheon was effaced. The principle that
the property of the state should educate the children
of the state was vindicated. The doors of the common
school were opened wide; all could enter upon equal
terms; there would be no further exemptions as the
stigma of the indigent and no further burdens to make
up deficiencies for the well-to-do to bear. The schools
were democratized. The free school was, above all else,
the affirmation of a principle of republican government,
a basal principal of a commonwealth, long apprehended
by statesmanship and expressed by the municipalities,
yet long waiting for full legal recognition. As such,
the statute of 1867 is to be commemorated in educa-
tional annals, and, credit is to be accorded to those
who were instrumental in securing it, and conspicu-
ously to Victor M. Rice who, as the head of the common
school system, was its consistent champion and tireless
promoter. But, aside from the principle, the law
immediately proved its utility. Within four months
from the time it became operative, Superintendent
Rice was able to say that it was meeting the most
sanguine hopes of its advocates ; "Already " he adds
" the local school officers report an average daily
attendance of pupils at the schools twenty to thirty-
five per cent greater than it was during the same
period of the year previous. In many districts, and
particularly w r here there is a large proportion of foreign
born population, it has been found necessary to in-
crease the accommodations, from this cause." He also
refers to the continued beneficial effects of the union
free school act of 1853 in contributing to the establish-
ment and maintenance of a superior class of graded
schools, claiming that in range and quality of in-
struction they compare favorably with the best acad-
emies which, in many localities, they are supplanting.
About eighty of some 300 chartered academies had at
this time been absorbed in the union free schools. The
following table — a comparison of the condition of these
schools at the time they were made free with that at
the time report* therefrom were collected by the super-
(50 Department of Public Instruction
intendent — shows something of the progress they bad
made:
Average increase of the time of main-
taining schools per year 9.4 per cent
Aggregate increase of the number of
teachers employed 2S weeks or longer
per year 88 "
Aggregate increase of the amount paid
for teachers' wages per year 141 " "
Aggregate increase of compensation to
each teacher per year 28 " "
Aggregate increase of the number of
children of school age 32 " "
Aggregate increase of the daily attend-
ance of pupils at school 74 " "
Aggregate increase of values of school-
houses and sites 178 " "
Prior to their organization as union free school dis-
tricts, there was an absence of comfortable housings,
qualified teachers were hard to obtain because it was
hard to pay them, the schools were not graded aud rate
bills repelled the children of the poor and parsimo-
nious; but, as organized, the children crowded the
schools and, the interest of the inhabitants being-
quickened, ampler provision for schoolhouses and com-
petent teachers was made. Inasmuch as the new free
school law had but just gone into effect, full statistics
are here omitted and comparisons will be made further
cost ot on. Let it suffice to state that at the close of the last
lios£ot* school year of Superintendent Rice's third term, the
Sinistra, schools were costing $7,683,201.22 as against $4,549,-
tion 870.76 at the close of that of his second term — an
increase of $3,133,330.56.
a n minis- On the 7th of April, 1868, Abram B. Weaver, a
V'uranrB* graduate of Hamilton college, who had been a school
weaver commissioner in Oneida county and a member of
assembly, became superintendent of public instruction.
He brought to the place experience in the schools and
was especially intelligent in devising measures for their
improvement. His reports were able and luminous
and his capacity for administration was manifest
throughout. It was his privilege to be the first execu-
tive of the free school law, for Superintendent Rice
was but permitted to start the machinery, which his
A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION Gl
successors operated. Mr. Weaver's first annual report
(1869) revealed the satisfaction he felt in his work
and his reflections thereon fitly supplement the antici-
pations of his predecessors. He says : " The cause of
public instruction, during the last fiscal year, has operation
* of tlio t"re
wrought results unequaled in all the past, and which, school
if they correctly denote a corresponding growth in the
popular estimate of the value and advantages of our
public schools, mark the beginning of a new and more
auspicious era in the department of the educational
system of the state. The effect of this amendment lias
not been confined to the financial policy thereby inaugu-
rated. It is distinctly traceable in lengthened terms
of school, in a larger and more uniform attendance,
and in more liberal expenditures for school buildings
and appliances. We are now enabled to study the
influence of this measure for the first year of its opera-
tion, and to judge of its merits in the light of a limited
experience. The liberal and progressive spirit that
authorized it will not fail to watch its workings with
unabated interest. The state is fully committed to the
policy of providing for all the children within its limits
the opportunity to acquire at least a sound elementary
education, sufficient for the duties of good citizenship
and for personal usefulness. This comprehensive plan
is not entirely new. It is the natural outgrowth and
development of the original enterprise initiated by
establishing common schools in 1812. With the excep-
tion of a brief period under the operation of the free
school law of 18-19, which was declared unconstitu-
tional by the courts on account of its conditional enact-
ment, the system as organized and conducted prior to
the late change, though efficient as could well be ex-
pected under conditions then existing, and entitled to
lasting gratitude and respect for the good it has
accomplished, never completely compassed the prin-
ciples upon which it rested." The following compara-
tive figures will show the impulse the schools received
in a single year:
Statistical
1867 1868
Number of districts 11,722 11,736
Number of male teachers 5,271 5,918
Number of female teachers 21.218 21,S65
Number of children attending
school 949,203 970,84-2
62 DiEFA&TM£NT OF PUBLJC INSTRUCTION
1867 1868
Average daily attendance 419,957 445,868
Visitations by commissioners 16,685 18,963
Aggregate number of schoolhouses. 11,556 11,674
Financial
1S67 1868
Apportionment of public
moneys $1,403,321 64 $2,302,515 Til
Raised by tax 5,101,754 53 6,338,801 77
Raised by rate bill 743,047 73
Proceeds of gospel and
school lands 26,009 24 23,134 62
Paid for teachers' wages.. 4,826,471 64 5,597,506 94
Paid for libraries 24,439 25 26,632 34
Paid for school apparatus. 211,665 47 234,52S 09
Paid for colored schools.. 56,413 23 64.807 54
Paid for schoolhouses,
sites, etc 1,713,107 01 2,184,064 95
Paid for incidental ex-
penses 850,766, 8l ( 933.187 60
Actual expenses of schools. 7,683,201 22 9,040,942 02
a second An episode of the earlier years u* Superintendent
iiiii e fU'ntion Weaver's tenure here interposes, to which reference is
due, not because it had eventful issue, but because it
is of interest now as the story of an attempt, almost
successful, at unifying the two great educational de-
partments of the government. During the ses-
sion of the legislature of 1869, a bill was in-
troduced in the assembly proposing " to abolish the
board of regents of the university, and to establish a
state board of education," charged with the general
supervision of all the public schools, academies and
colleges and with the administration of the laws relat-
ing to them. The bill was referred to the committee
on public education reported from that committee and
occasioned considerable discussion in the house, but it
was not pressed to a vote. Late in the session, how-
ever, a resolution was adopted directing the superin
tendent to report to the next legislature as to the pro-
priety of abolishing the board of regents and to propose
such legislation, if any, as might be necessary to place
the colleges, academies and free schools under a more
A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION t»3
efficient management. In accordance with the reso-
lution, Mr Weaver prepared an exhaustive report, in
his usually clear and incisive phrase, giving in outline
a description of the several systems of education ob-
taining in the state, pointing out defects in each, but
insisting that the h§ad of the department of education
should be a single officer, acting, not as the secretary
or agent of a board, but upon his own responsibility,
being directly accountable to the legislature. The fol-
lowing passage is pertinent now. " The state itself
has but one system of education, which it maintains
and enforces, and that is organically a unit. It is the
system of public instruction, embracing 11,750 schools,
organized and supported upon one general plan. To
unite with these schools the academies as now organ-
ized would not produce uniformity. The association
of chartered academies, charging for tuition, with free
public schools, would constitute not a homogeneous
system, but an incongruous combination;" and further:
" It is no more essential that the regents remaki an
independent body in order to carry out faithfully the
duties imposed upon them respecting colleges and
academies, than that the school commissioners, who
perform similar duties in respect to common schools
should have an organization independent of the De-
partment.'' He concludes with recommending the pas-
sage of an act containing two leading propositions, (1)
that the duration of the office of any regent, hereafter
elected, be limited to a definite term of years; and (2)
that the board of regents be made part of the depart-
ment of education having specific duties the same as
those then performed by them and, in addition, that
they be required to visit and inspect the several normal
schools; and that their report be made to the head of
the Department, to be incorporated in his annual re-
port, so that one document might present a complete
view of the working of the entire system of education
in the state. A bill was accordingly introduced in the
assembly, April 12, 1870, by John L. Flagg, of Rens-
selaer county, which provided for the election of a super-
intendent of public education for a term of three years
by joint ballot of the senate and assembly who should
possess all the powers and be charged with all the
duties previously vested in or imposed upon the super-
intendent of public instruction with certain enlarged
04 Department of Public Instruction
powers specified; his salary was to be $5,000; the
regents of the university were to be nineteen in num-
ber, including those then in office, but as deaths or
resignations occurred new regents were to be elected
for terms of ten years ; all annual reports of the regents
in relation to colleges and acaden^es were to be made
to the superintendent of education; the regents were
required to visit and inspect the several state normal
schools and report thereon to the superintendent the
names of the several institutions entitled to participate
in the distribution of the literature fund and other
appropriations and the number of pupils upon which
the distribution was based and the superintendent was
to thereafter make and deliver to the comptroller a
schedule of the distribution of such moneys, the same
to be paid by the treasurer upon the warrant of the
comptroller. This bill was passed by the legislature
of 1S70, but failed to meet the approval of Governor
Hoffman and so ended the attempt at unification over
thirty years ago. It is not, however, amiss to say that
Superintendent Weaver entertained very sensible views
upon the subject and that his plan is quite similar to
that which has now become law.
Last re- The annual report of Mr Weaver, for the school year
first term ending September 30, 1870 — the last report of his first
temienT 111 " term — records better results than the common school
weaver S y S tem had before produced. Among the evidences of
progress are the continued improvement in the material
of school buildings, log houses decreasing 136 and
frame and brick structures increasing 3S and 200
respectively during the year; the value of schoolhouses
and sites increasing from $18,449,048 to $20,426,421;
the aggregate school attendance increasing from 998,664
to 1,026,447 and the average attendance from 468,421
to 484,705 ; the whole number of teachers employed de-
creasing from 28,310 to 2S.217, the decrease accounted
for by the increase from 17,140 to 17,437 of those em-
ployed for 28 weeks or more ; the average weekly wages
of teachers in cities increasing from $15.16 to $16.12
and in the rural districts from $7.S6 to $8.13, the
average annual salaries, inclusive of both city and rural
districts, having increased from $309.23 in 1867 to
$372.58 in 1870; 90 academies had been absorbed in
union free schools and the number of graded schools
had risen to 694; teachers' institutes had been held in
A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION G5
rural districts in attendance; six normal schools were
in successful operation, and teachers' classes were
maintained in ST academies. The actual cost of the
schools for 1870 was, in the cities 15,074,809.31 and, in
the rural districts $4,830,644.91, a total of. $9,905,574.22.
The only criticism, in which the superintendent in-
dulges, is that relating to the decadence of the libraries,
which had been occurring for years, the number of
volumes having diminished since 1853 more than
600,000— from 1,604,210 to 986,697— while $935,000 had
been appropriated to them, this being explained by the
permission to districts, upon certain conditions, some-
times complied with, but more frequently disregarded,
to use the money for apparatus and teachers' wages.
The annual report of Superintendent Weaver for the Tas * an_
r ' mini re-
SCllOOl year ending September 30, 1873, bristles with port <*t
statistics, and states that the aggregate and average tendent
attendance at the schools is unprecedented, exceeding
that of any previous year by several thousands, this
not being a fortuitous increase, but the product of an
interrupted growth characterizing the returns each
year since the inauguration of the free school system.
Some of these statistics are here transcribed.
Normal schools
Location
Albany
Brockport
Buffalo
Cortland
Fredonia
Geneseo
Oswego ,
I'otsdam
When
opened
1844
1867
1871
1869
1868
1871
1S63
No. of
graduates
1,976
85
22
98
111
14
549
40
Expenses
for 1st::
$23,034 79
21,820 59
19.716 40
18,395 01
20.6S2 57
21,186 74
18,000 00
19,075 05
Received for
tuition, 1873
$3,537 50
2,560 1<>
600 00
269 75
611 70
1,130 20
1869
1,678 75
These schools were amply justifying their being,
although, owing to contracts with localities for
academic and other departments they were not and
are not yet as strictly professional as their name im-
plies. The following are statistical and financial tables
for 1873 :
Statistical Rural
Cities districts Total
Number of districts 66S 11.327 11,995
Number of teachers employed at the same
time for 28 weeks or more 4,940 13.355 IS, 295
Number of male teachers employed 592 6,505 7.097
Number of.female teachers employed 5.166 17,201 22,367
Number of children in attendance 416.063 614.716 1,030,779
Average daily attendance..: 203,697 295,772 499,469
B6 Department of Public Instruction
Financial
Rural
Receipts Cities districts Total
Amount on hand October 1, 1872. $878,905 96 $255,651 37 $1,134,557 33
Apportionment of public moneys 1,028,714 35 1,665,627 56 2,694,341 91
Proceeds of gospel and school
lands 36 44 35,626 17 35,662 61
Raised by tax 4,600,019 05 3,043,345 47 7,643,364 52
Estimated value of teachers'
board 225,93168 225,93168
From all other sources 105,103 71 249,80122 354,904 93
$6,612,779 51 $5,475,9S3 47 $12,088,762 98
Rural
Payments Cities districts Total
For teachers' wages $3,693,641 64 $3,721,539 75 $7,415,181 39
For libraries 11,985 65 15,218 14 27,203 79
For school apparatus 234.SS9 92 59,255 76 294,145 68
For colored schools 66,54S 03 8,063 46 74,61149
For schoolhouses, sites, etc 1,050,926 50 943,206 39 1,994,132 89
For incidental expenses 663,714 59 476.S6S 13 1,140, 5S0 72
Forfeited, in hands of super-
visors 15125 15125
Amount on hand October 1, 1S73. 891,073 IS 251,682 59 1,142,755 77
Totals $6,612,779 51 $5,475,983 47 $12,088,762 98
Deducting from the totals, under the head of pay-
ments, the sums remaining on hand October 1, 1873, it
appears that the actual expense of maintaining the
common schools during the year was $10,946,007.21.
Comparing some of these figures with those of the year
(1867) preceding Superintendent Weavers accession to
office, and the operation of the free school act, the fol-
lowing increases will be noted: Number of districts
223; number of teachers employed 2,975; children in
attendance 81,756 ; average daily attendance 79.512 and
in the actual expenses of the schools of $3,262,S05.99.
The average time each pupil in the cities attended
school was 19 weeks and in the rural districts 16 2-10
weeks. The average length of school terms in the cities
was 41 weeks, and, in the state, 35 weeks. Super-
intendent Weaver's administration was eminently
sound and practical. He thoroughly believed in the
democratic principle upon which the common schools
are based and his courage was displayed in his care
for their concerns, in his proposal that the head of
the department of education should be the head of all
the educational affairs of the state, in his resolute
opposition to the appropriation of any moneys raised
by taxation to institutions belonging either to private
corporations or religious denominations, and in his con-
sistent fealty to the cause of elementary education. In
this, there was with him " neither variation nor shadow
of turning."
A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION <>1
On the 7th of April, 1874, Neil Gilmour, who was a £*&£J'if
graduate of Union college, and had been a teacher and superin-
o ■ o ? tendent
school commissioner in Saratoga county, became super- Giimonr
intendent.of public instruction. He was reelected in
1877 and again in 1S80. In his first annual report
(1S75) he refers to the statistics of the year as exhibit-
ing a steady growth in the existing system, which
amply vindicates the wisdom of the legislation
of 1867. He notes that the number of school
districts in the towns bad decreased from 11,327,
in 1873, to 11,299, in 1874, caused chiefly by the con-
solidation of small districts, and the formation of
union graded schools in the more populous towns and
villages. Slight decreases are noted in succeeding
years, due to the same causes and to the settled policy
of the Department to encourage the organization of
such schools. The superintendent calls attention, as
had his immediate predecessor, to the continuous decay
of the district libraries, and is satisfied that their use-
fulness is ended. He distinctly favors the establish-
ment of town, in lieu of district, libraries. He renews
the same suggestion in 1870, in which year, he also
alludes to an issue, that has vexed the Department more
or less, for many years — the actual or attempted
evasion of the law and the constitution by denomina-
tional schools obtaining public moneys. With the con-
nivance of local authorities, against plain legal pro-
hibitions. This issue may again be referred to, but
Superintendent Gilmour's words may here be quoted
as declaratory of his resolute attitude thereon : " There
are reports" he writes "that propositions have
already been made, and in some cases accepted, that
certain parochial schools, not under the control of the
state, should be used by the trustees or boards of edu-
cation of the districts in which they are located, on
condition that the teachers be appointed by those
having the control of such schools, or that the course
of instruction be subject to their approval. The
adoption of such a policy would be a step towards the
destruction of our system .of public instruction. I
earnestly recommend that the legislature take such
steps as will securely imbed in the constitution of the
state our common schools; as will place them beyond
the power of any man or set of men, party or sect, to
interfere with their admirable working, or in any man-
68 Department op Public Instruction
ner impair their usefulness or tend to their destruc-
tion." According to the report for the school year end-
ing September 30, 187G, the last year of Superintendent
Gilmour's first term, the schools had cost $11,439.-
038.78; the number of school districts in the towns was
11,285; the number of schoolhouses in the cities was
430 and the rural districts 11.824; the male teachers
were 7,687 and the female, 22,522; the aggregate attend-
ance was 1,067,199 and the average daily attendance
was 541,610.
Aaitation During Superintendent Gilmour's second term, pub-
the normal he attention was called to the work oi the normal
lct°f teachers. The history of professional examina-
examina- tions in this state is an interesting one, already referred
lions CT
to incidentally, but which now calls for a somewhat ex-
tended review. From the first, the state insisted that
teachers should possess proper qualifications for their
calling. The act of 1795 specified, among the other
duties of town commissioners, that they slum Id deter-
mine the qualifications of teachers. It also provided
that the inhabitants residing within different parts of
any town might form associations for the purpose of
maintaining schools and might appoint two or more
persons to act in their behalf as trustees, who should
employ teachers and consult with the commissioners
concerning their qualifications, and the associations
were debarred from the apportionment of public
moneys, unless the trustees employed teachers who met
the approval of the commissioners. This method ob-
A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 77
tained until 1812. The act of that year, which fixed
the number of commissioners of a town at three, pro-
vided, also, as has been stated, for three inspectors who,
with the commissioners, were made a board to examine
and license teachers. This plan was continued until
1841, when the number of inspectors for a town was
fixed at two, who were still associated with the com-
missioners as an examining and licensing board.
Power was also given to deputy superintendents in the
same respect. In 1813, when the offices of town com-
missioners and inspectors were abolished, their func-
tions were vested in town superintendents, and the
name of deputy was changed to that of county superin-
tendent, each with territorial jurisdiction defined by
his title. The acts also conferred upon the superin-
tendent of common schools, on the recommendation of
county superintendents, or such other evidence as
might be satisfactory to him, the power to issue cer-
tificates entitling their holders to teach in any public
school within the state. After the abolition of the
office of county superintendent in 1847, there remained
but two authorities to issue teachers certificates — the
state superintendent and the town superintendents,
those of the latter having validity only within their
own towns. In 185G, the office of town superintendent
being vacated, school commissioners succeeded, with
authority to examine teachers and issue certificates
for their respective districts, with the Superintendent
of Public Instruction empowered to prescribe the rules
under which such certificates might be issued. State
superintendents never, however, exercised this power
until 1888, when Superintendent Draper promulgated
the uniform system of examination for the guidance of
commissioners. For many years there had been a
demand for a change in the method of certification of
teachers. Certificates in many cases were issued to
unqualified persons, because of political pressure and
sometimes because of corrupt appliances. The wisdom
of placing this important work under the immediate
direction of the State Superintendent and establishing
a uniform basis for examining and licensing the
teachers of the entire state had been a subject for dis-
cussion at many of the state educational associations
and was generally conceded. Superintendent Draper
at once understood that the absence of a definite
78 Department of Public Instruction
scheme to determine the qualifications of teachers was
one of the weakest things in the school system, and he
sought to remedy it with all the energy and resources
at his command. The opinion prevailed that legisla-
tion was necessary to centralize this work under the
superintendent and he prepared a bill to this end,
which passed the legislature, in 1887, but was vetoed by
Governor Hill, upon the ground, as the Governor
claimed, that it discriminated in favor of New York
and Brooklyn, which were excepted from its operation.
The failure to obtain legislation did not discourage the
superintendent. He was resolved to raise the teaching-
force to a higher standard and he thought it could be
done in no more effectual way than by instituting a
definite uniform method for the examination of
teachers. Seventy-five per cent, of the commissioners
in their reports had favored such a scheme under
the direction of the superintendent. It was suggested
that commissioners might request the superintendent
to provide uniform rules and prepare questions
to be used by them in their examinations. Every
educational association in the state and every
educational journal therein gave this movement their
cordial support. By September 1, 1887, sixty commis-
sioners had expressed their willingness to adopt rules
formulated by the superintendent and to use examina-
tion papers provided by him. The first examinaiion
was held in September, 1887, and monthly examina-
tions were held during the remainder of the year. By
July 1. 1888, every commissioner in the state had volun-
examina- tarily adopted the uniform system. Superintendent
eompiisiied Draper held that, under certain provisions of the school
laws, he already possessed the power to ordain a uni-
form system of examinations and to compel the com-
missioners to adopt it. In this view, he was sustained
by Attorney-General Charles F. Tabor. He, therefore,
issued an order that, in the future, all commissioners
should comply with the requirements of the uniform
system. Whatever doubt may have existed as to the
authority of the superintendent was removed in 1801,
when the revised ronsolidated school law was enacted
which, by subdivision 5, title 5, section 13, of that
act directs that the school commissioners shall ; " ex-
amine, under such rules and regulations as have been
or may be prescribed by the Superintendent of Public
A REVIEW OP ITS ADMINISTRATION 79
Instruction, persons proposing to teach common schools
within his district * * * an d ? jf he finds them
qualified, to grant them certificates of qualification in
the forms which are or may be prescribed by the super-
intendent." The Department now prepares all papers Examina-
used in examinations and forwards them to commis- generally
sioners. The papers submitted by candidates were
marked by commissioners until June, 1894. The legis-
lature of that year made provision for the appointment
of a board of examiners in the State Department.
This board was organized in June, 1894, and since then
all examination papers have not only been prepared
by the Department, but the answer papers submitted
by candidates have also been marked in that Depart-
ment by a permanent board of examiners. This places
the certification of teachers upon an absolutely honest
and uniform basis and renders it impossible for a per-
son to obtain a certificate who does not possess the
requisite scholarship. The same evils and abuses that
existed in commissioner districts before the uniform
system was adopted prevailed to some extent in the
cities of the state. While the State Superintendent
had the authority to prescribe the regulations under
which teachers should be examined in commissioner
districts, he did not possess authority to prescribe such
rules for the cities. The charter of each, or special
educational acts therefor, determine in what manner
the teachers of such cities shall be examined and
licensed. In some of the cities, the uniform system of
examinations governs by statute. In most, however,
teachers are examined and licensed under such regu-
lations as the local school board, or superintendent pre-
scribes, and the authorities of nearly all the cities have
adopted the uniform system, Albany, Buffalo, James-
town and New York being the exceptions. Under the
uniform system of examinations thus adopted three
classes of teachers' certificates were issued, as follows :
A third grade certificate valid for six months, renew-
able only upon examination and to be issued to the
same person but twice. A second grade certificate
valid for two years and renewable only upon examina-
tion. A first grade certificate valid for five years and
renewable in the discretion of a commissioner without
examination. This system with various modifications
and amendments is still in force. Temporary permits
80
Department of Public Instruction
Reforms
instituted
by Super-
intendent
Draper
Supervi-
sion of
training'
classes
vested in
superin-
tendent
are issued, to bridge over an emergency, and continue
only long enough to carry the candidate to the next
examination. Uniform and grade examinations are
now held at appropriate times and places, in the dis-
tricts, and for life state certificates, in August, in
various cities. There are also examinations for kinder-
garten teachers. A certificate is issued by the superin-
tendent, without examination, to any graduate of a
college or university, who has had three years experi-
ence as a teacher in the public schools of the state sub-
sequent to graduation; and the holder of a normal
school diploma is thereby accredited as a teacher.
Superintendent Draper was famous, as he still is,
for his capacity for organization. He did things. In
addition to his signal reform in the conduct of exam-
inations — the crowning glory of his administration —
many other of his achievements might be recorded.
To a few, attention must certainly be drawn ; and, first
of these, is the transfer of the control of teachers'
classes from the regents to the department of public
instruction. Shortly after Superintendent Draper
assumed office, he found that there were, under the
management of the regents, 195 teachers' classes in
142 academies and union schools, with 2,676 students,
for whom tuition was allowed from the state appro-
priation for that purpose to the amount of $33,091.
Educators were generally apprehending the incongruity
of the control of these classes by the regents — an
agency really foreign to the common schools — super-
vising the preparation of their teachers, and the
thought was dominant in their minds that all the
instrumentalities tor such preparation, the normal
schools, the uniform examinations, the teachers' insti-
tutes and the teachers' classes should be related to
each other, each accommodating itself to and supple-
menting the work of the other. It was seen that three
of these were so related, while the fourth was acting
separately and independently. At the annual holiliav
conference of the associated academic principals, in
1888, at Syracuse, this sentiment took shape not, as
is to be suspected, without the inspiration of the super-
intendent, in a resolution adopted unanimously to
the effect that, as the licensing of teachers was in
the hands of the superintendent and as it was desir-
able that the teachers' classes should be part of a
symmetrical system for the education of teachers, the
A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 81
management of such classes should be trans-
ferred to the department of public instruction. This
resolution, accompanied by a coherent and convinc-
ing statement of the situation, was presented by Super-
intendent Draper to the board of regents and met with
the prompt and cordial acquiescence of that body; and
by chapter 137 of the laws of 1889, the supervision
of the teachers' classes passed from the regents to the
department, with the best results, as the concurrent
evidence of principals, commissioners and educators
generally, abundantly attests. Still other features of
Superintendent Draper's administration, some of statu-
tory and others of his individual sanction, were these:
The changing of district school meetings from the last
to the first Tuesday in August and the closing of the
school year on the 25th of July instead of the 20th
of August; the changing of county to district institutes,
in the hope that they would be less mass meetings
and more schools of instruction (although as now
graded the institutes are frequently joint ones of two
or more districts) ; the publication of a new code of
public instruction; contracts with teachers to be in
writing and monthly payment of their wages made
mandatory; competitive examinations for the free
scholarships from assembly districts in Cornell uni-
versity; the extention of the minimum time, in which
schools were to be kept open, from 20 to 32 weeks;
the obtaining of designs and specifications for the build-
ing of schoolhouses to cost from $600 to $10,000 and
their wide dissemination; the health and decency act;
the increase of general state appropriations for free
schools by $1,000,000; admission to normal schools, the
courses of study and the condition of graduation reg-
ulated with a view to making them more completely
training schools for teachers; the chartering of three
new normal schools — New Paltz, Oneonta and Platts- ^ast an-
burg; and the designation of the Friday following the port of
first day of May in each year as Arbor day. Very tend".""
properly could the superintendent say, in surrendering Draper
his trust : " Careful students of American systems of
education must admit that New York holds deservedly
a most prominent position among her sister states as
regards provisions for popular instruction. Although
she has never received her full share of credit for the
part she played in the past, which entitled her to a
82
Department of Public Instruction
most conspicuous position in the history of popular
education in this country, yet she is now attracting
universal attention by the tremendous efforts of the
present. We are now realizing that the first and most
important duty of the sin te is to provide a good ele-
mentary education for the masses, on whose intelli-
gence and patriotism the safety of the commonwealth
depends, and to see that every child receives such an
education. It only remains to agree on the details of
the measures and then the feeling would be ripe and
the circumstances opportune for decisive legislation,
which would soon enable New York, with her boundless
wealth and her great liberality, to distance all com-
petitors, and to make her elementary schools the best
in the world." The following are statistical and finan-
cial tables for the year ending July 25, 1891 :
Statistical
Number of districts
Number of teachers emplovei.1 at the same
time for legal term of school 9,126
Number of male teachers employed 970
Number of female teachers employed 9,512
Number of children in attendance 513,066
Average daily attendance 344,609
Number of times visited by commissioners
Number volumes in district, libraries 244,333
Number schoolhouses, log
Number schoolhouses, frame 56
Number school houses, brick 533
Number schoolhouses, stone 6
Total number schoolhouses 595
Financial
Receipts Cities
Amount on hand at beginning of
school year $2,393,739 99
Apportionment of public moneys 1,649,900 74
Proceeds of gospel and school
lands 1,062 94
Raised by tax 8,460,756 44
Estimated value of teachers'
bti.'inl
From all other sources 636,972 41
Rural
districts
11,196
15,231
17! Ill
540,978
305,408
13-.939
584,820
45
10,070
1,040
322
11,477
Rural
districts
$704,112 75
2,115,355 76
29.3S3 31
3,692,593 47
46,794 24
538,446 24
Total
11,196
24,357
5,359
ui;.i;-:;
1,054,044
650.017
13.939
829,153
45
10,126
1,573
328
12,072
$3,097,852 74
3,765,256 50
30.446 25
12, 153, 349 91
46,794 24
1,175,418 65
Total $13,142,432 52 $7,126,685 77 $20,269,118 29
Payments
For teachers' wages
For libraries
For school apparatus
For schoolhouses. siles. etC
For incidental expenses
Forfeited, with supervisors
Amount on hand at end of yeai
Total
Cities
56,564,365 94
24.620 41
340,236 L0
2,707,165 70
1,213,205 64
2,292,838 73
Rural
districts
$4,443,620 49
27,588 94
53,926 85
998,798 11
795,440 18
916 63
SOI, 444 27
Total
,012,986 43
52,159 35
394,162 95
,705,964 11
,008,645 82
916 63
,094.283 00
$13,142.132 52 $7,126,6S5 77 $20,269,118 29
Deducting from this total, the amount on hand at
the end of the school year, the actual expense of main-
A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 83
taining the schools, for the year ending July 25, 1891,
was $17,174,835.29 or $3,708,-407.32 more than they cost
for the year immediately preceding Superintendent
Draper's accession. Meanwhile, the aggregate value of
schoolhouses and sites increased from $35,662,084 to
-150,013,491, the average daily attendance from 625,813
to 650,017, the average length of school term in the
towns from 33.3 to 35.3 weeks, the number of teachers
employed for the legal term, from 22,240 to 24,357 ; the
amount paid for teachers' wages from $9,102,268.77 to
$11,012,986.43; their average annual earnings from
$409.27 to $452.16, and their average weekly wages
from $11.46 to 12.18.
James F. Crooker, who had been a teacher and ^"^J^f
superintendent of the schools of Buffalo, became superin-
superintendent of public instruction, April 7, 1892, crooker
and served one term. The prevailing tone of his
first annual report (1893) is that of satisfaction
with the condition of the schools. There is, he
discovers, a spirit of improvement manifest in the
character and capacity of the buildings, the rude
structures in the rural districts having given place
to modern and comfortable ones. The primitive
log housings had substantially disappeared, only 41
of that kind remaining. " Within the last two
decades," he says, " vast advance strides have been
made in school architecture and schoolhouses are now
constructed upon sound scientific principles and with
a view of obeying the laws of health." He accompanies
his statement with specimen drawings of both the ex-
terior and interior of a number of the recently erected
houses, creditable in appearance and convenient in
appointments, in the likeness of which there are, to day,
thousands in the state — in the towns, as well as in the
cities and villages, our school architecture certainly
not being excelled by that of any other state. Upon
this development, in which every citizen of New York
may take just pride, the later superintendents have
bestowed great pains. The superintendent is gratified
in that the number of normal school graduates em-
ployed for the past exceeds that of the preceding year
by 426 and concludes that the normal courses, the
training classes and the uniform examinations are, in
concert, doing much to elevate the standards of the
public schools and to render them more and more
84
Department of Public Instruction
Superin-
tendent
Crooker's
views on
elemen-
tary and
secondary
education
efficient; the salaries of teachers have appreciated but
he still thinks that they are disgracefully meager in
the country schools. In common with nearly all his
predecessors he advocates the adoption of the town-
ship, and the doing away with the district, system, but
his recommendation to that end was unheeded by the
legislature, as has been that of his successor, although
sustained by the leading educators of the state and by
the unvarying experience of other states in its favor,
which means of course town trustees, with the com-
missioners intermediary between them and the state
superintendent.
Superintendent Crooker had certain positive ideas
concerning the obligation of the state to stimulate and
support elementary, as compared with and even prefer-
ential to, higher and secondary, education, and he did
not hesitate to express them. In die report, now under
consideration, he somewhat bluntly, thus phrases his
thought: "Too much attention is given to higher edu-
cation at the expense of a thorough, practical ground-
ing in a knowledge of the subjects with which the
great masses have to deal in ordinary business trans-
actions. * * * If the state deems it wise that
greater expenditure for school purposes should be made,
instead of appropriating increased sums for academic
education, examinations in law and medicine, univer-
sity extension, and all such schemes which are of
doubtful propriety for the state to meddle with, it were
a thousand fold better to appropriate money for the
establishment of kindergarten schools in the large
cities. Better appropriate $50,000 for such schools in
the cities than $1,000 for university extension, so
called." The superintendent repeats the same views
in his second annual report (1894) and enlarges
upon them in his third (1895). From this the
following passages are quoted : " The common schools
are the special wards of the Department of Public
Instruction, and every dollar of state school moneys
withheld from them by being diverted to other and
more fortunate schools, means inexcusable injustice
and tends to weaken and injure them materially. In
my previous annual reports. I have alluded to the
injustice and deleterious effects of the clashing
dual-headed system which exists in the management
of public education. A large amount of the public
A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 85
school moneys, which rightly belongs to the common
school funds for general apportionment, is with-
drawn yearly and devoted to a purpose entirely at
variance with the spirit of free public education. This
diversion is wrong in principle, wrong in application,
and vicious in its tendencies and results. This double-
headed educational management is the most peculiar
feature in this state or in any other. No other depart-
ment in the state has two heads for the management
of its affiairs. It is an anomaly! One branch dis-
tributes a portion of the school funds in its own way,
according to its own peculiar and independent rules,
while the other apportions another part in accordance
with the statutory laws governing it. * * *
The state appropriation yearly, for the support of the
regents, is over $1S5,500. This I consider an useless
expense so far as the interest of a great majority of
the public schools is concerned, although it may be of
financial benefit to these few; I must, therefore,
earnestly protest once more against the dual system
and plan of taking away any portion of the state
moneys from the common school fund for the purpose
of sustaining two educational departments and prac-
ticing favoritism toward one branch of the school sys-
tem at the expense of another. It is radically and
inexcusably wrong. * * * The recently amended
constitution, in an article, provides against the pay-
ment of any public school moneys toward the main-
tenance of any private schools or parochial institutions,
and now the legislature ought to provide, by an enact-
ment of law, against the use of any money by the
regents, if only to prohibit the paying of premiums
to schools on examinations, and it would thereby save
to the state a large amount of money that could be
used for general educational purposes." These views
of Superintendent Crooker are reproduced, not specially
with the purpose of endorsing them, but as due to
him as an affirmation of his fidelity to the common
school system and his sensitiveness to what he con-
sidered encroachments upon its democratic adminis-
tration, as well as his contribution to the vexed ques-
tion of the unification of the educational departments
of the state, the discussion of which, in late years,
has engaged so much of the attention of educators
and statesmen, with so many and so diverse proposi-
tions for departure and adjustment.
86
Department of Public Instruction
Changes
in the ex-
amination
depart-
ment
Consoli-
dated
school act
of 1894
Superin-
tendent
CrooUer's
last :• ■ i —
annual
report
Important changes were made in the examination
department during 1894. In accordance with the
recommendation of the superintendent, the legislature
made an appropriation enabling him to appoint a board
of examiners to pass upon the answer papers submitted
by candidates for commissioners' certificates to teach
in the state. Such board was duly constituted and
has since done admirable work. Under it, a certificate
of any grade issued in any county is of the same value
as a certificate of a corresponding grade issued in
any other count};, and the commissioners are relieved
of a large amount of clerical work previously devolv-
ing upon them. The legislature of 1894 passed the
" consolidated school act," the same taking effect
June 30. This was the first revision, or consolidation,
since 18G4. No radical changes were made by it, but,
under it, the school year begins August 1 and ends
July 31; schools must be taught, at least 100 days in-
clusive of legal holidays and exclusive of Saturdays;
all school district officers must be elected by ballot; all
propositions for the expenditure of money, or authoriz-
ing the levy of a tax, must be determined by ballot,
or by the ayes and noes of qualified voters ; and where
a tax is voted to be raised for the building of a school-
house, or an addition thereto, said tax to be raised by
installments, the payment, or collection, of the last
installment cannot be extended beyond twenty years.
The following are statistical and financial tables for
the year ending July 31, 1894 :
Statistical
Rural
Cities districts Total
Number of districts 11,121 11,121
Number of teachers employed at I lie same
time for 1G0 days or more in. 264 15.632 25.vn;
Number of male teachers employed 1,022 4.074 5.036
Number of female teachers empioyed 10.729 17,104 27,833
Number of children in attendance r,s:i.::t;:: :,?,:.. G35 1,124,998
Average daily attendance 407,955 313. 10S 721,f su-
exhibit that the amount expended upon the schools eniTsictn- "
had reached vast proportions, illustrative of the great- "/^ fil " st
ness and liberality of the commonwealth. The total
cost of the schools for the year ending July 31, 1897,
was |2G,689,85C, an increase in one year of $3,516,026
and in 12 years of $13,401,870. The cities spent
$19,152,014, an increase in one year of $3,610,573, and
in 12 years of $11,274,047, the towns spent $7,537,212,
a decrease in one year of $94,547, but an increase in
12 years of $2,130,823. The cost had thus increased
more than 100 per cent in 12 years. During this
period, the number of teachers employed for the legal
term increased 2S^ per cent; the amount of teachers'
salaries 55^ per cent ; the number of children of school
age had decreased nearly four per cent, due entirely
to the change in school age; the average daily attend-
ance had increased 31 per cent, and the amount ex-
pended for schoolhouses, sites, furniture and repairs
had increased 270 per cent. The invested common
school fund was $4,473,140.77.
During the year 1897, a judicial decision was ren The school
dered, so important in its bearings, as to make a some-Mta^ai
what extended reference to it proper. It was the affir- ln " 41tutlon
mation of the power of the state to compel a municipal-
ity, or school district, to provide and maintain adequate
educational facilities, or, otherwise put, that the school
is a state and not a local institution. The issue arose
94 Department of Public Instruction
in the city of Watervliet, where a bi-partisan board
of education of four members, owing to a deadlock,
neglected and refused to appoint teachers, janitors and
other officers, at the opening of the school year, Sep
tember 7, and the children were forced to seek instruc-
tion elsewhere, or roam the streets. An appeal Mas
made to the state superintendent by two members of
the board to effect the removal of the two other mem-
bers. This petition the superintendent did not feel at
liberty to grant, but he ordered the board to open the
schools on or before the 4th day of October and that the
necessary teachers, etc., should be appointed. The day
passed, without compliance with the order, and the
superintendent, concluding that, under the mandate of
the constitution and the provisions of the consolidated
school law, he was clothed with the requisite authority,
directed an employee of the department to proceed to
Watervliet and there act temporarily as superintendent
of schools, at the same time appointing a full corps
of teachers, attendance officers, janitors and a
librarian. The schcols were thus opened October 5,
about 1,400 pupils being present. Two residents of the
city made application to the Supreme Court for an
injunction restricting the state superintendent from
interfering with their local school system. The case
was heard before Justice Alden Chester, at a special
term at Albany, in November, the Honorable Danforth
E. Ainsworth, deputy superintendent of public instruc-
tion appearing for the department, and the Honorable
Edwin Countryman for the applicants. Justice Ches-
ter denied the application in an elaborate opinion, up-
holding the action of the superintendent in all particu-
lars, upon the ground that he had jurisdiction in the
matter, which he rightfully exercised for the benefit of
the schools, that " the mandate of the constitution can-
not be nullified at the will of an} r local board, failing
to discharge the duties imposed upon it by law, but
that the power exists to compel obedience to this re-
quirement, and this power is lodged in the state super-
intendent of public instruction." No appeal was taken
from Justice Chester's ruling, and it stands as law and
precedent, not probably to be again questioned. Con-
nected with school affairs in Watervliet was a decision
L , i, e oo e i cnlar of the superintendent, dated .May 15, 1897, to the effect
that the wearing of an unusual garb, used exclusively
A REVIEW OP ITS ADMINISTRATION 9E
by members of one religious sect, as indicating affilia-
tion with that sect, -by the teachers in a public school,
constitutes a sectarian influence, which cannot be
tolerated and must be prohibited. Superintendent,
Draper had made a like decision, ten years previously,
and it had not been modified or disapproved by bis
successors. It has the force and effect of a statute,
and is based upon the secular character of the schools
which must be maintained alike against technical
evasion and open assault.
In his annual report (1899) the superintendent says
that compulsory education in this state is no longer
a mere pretence, but an accomplished fact. The neces- compnt-
sity and propriety of compelling the attendance of cation,
children upon the schools had long engaged the atten-
tion of the department and had by degrees been
resolved into law. The first act was that of 1853, which
provided that any vagrant child, in any city or incor-
porated village, between the ages of five and 14 years,
upon complaint of any citizen on oath, should be
brought before a magistrate for examination, and
the parent, guardian or master of such child should
be notified to attend such examination, and if the com-
plaint should be established, the magistrate was to
require from such parent, guardian or master a
contract in writing with the corporate authorities
that such child should be sent to some school
at least four mouths in each year, until he or
she should become 11 years old. The law also
imposed pecuniary penalties for nonfulfillment of the
contract, directed the commitment of a vagrant child,
who had no parent, guardian or master, to an institu-
tion for instruction, and authorized the corporate
authorities to provide suitable places for the reception
of such. New York was thus the first state, except
Massachusetts, to enact a compulsory education law.
It was, however, enforced spasmodically and irration-
ally, if, it may be said, that it was enforced at all.
Public sentiment was adverse or had not been educated
up to it. The statistics of school attendance, from
18GG to 1873, show that from 55 to 60 per cent of the
children over six and under 17 years old, were out of
school every day— a grievous condition, perilous to the
state.
96 Department of Public Instruction
In 1874, the second compulsory act was ordained and
became operative, January 1, 1875. Although an im-
provement upon the statute of 1853, it was defectively
and carelessly drawn, and inadequate in its sanctions.
It required all children, between 8 and 11 years
of age, of sufficient physical and mental strength,
to attend school at "least fourteen weeks in each year,
eight of which should be consecutive. Local school
authorities were empowered to enforce attendance and
to furnish suitable places for the instruction, dis-
cipline and confinement of truant children. It was a
species of local option and depended entirely upon pub-
lic sentiment for its validity. Amended in 1S76, it
still failed of its object. In his annual report (1888)
Superintendent Draper said: "There is a large
uneducated class in this state, and our statistics show
that it is growing larger. * * * To be sure, we
have a compulsory education law upon our statute
books, but it is a compulsory education law that does
not compel. It has never been acted under to any con-
siderable extent, and this being so after fourteen years
of trial, it is fair to presume that it never will be. In
my opinion, there are good reasons why it has never
accomplished what was desired of it. In the first place,
it requires members of boards of education to look after
and apprehend delinquent children, and it is un-
reasonable to expect that officials elected only to
manage the schools, and who serve without pay, will
devote the necessary time, or that they will engage in
work which should devolve upon a policeman or con-
stable, or some other officer specially charged with and
paid for such service. Again, the penalties provided
for in the act run mainly against children, and no peo-
ple will be swift to enforce penalties against children
for delinquency, not amounting to crime, for which
they are not properly so answerable as are their parents
or guardians. The penalties in the act which go
against parents are mere fines, so inconsiderable as to
be ridiculous, and the machinery for collecting them is
too cumbersome and expensive to be commonly made
use of. Moreover, the act requires that children under
11 years of age should attend for at least fourteen
weeks in the year. Attendance for so small a part of
the year is hardly of enough importance to justify any
serious effort to insure it. Again, the law does not re-
A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 97
quire communities to act in the matter, nor does it pro-
vide any adequate school facilities for the accommoda-
tion of delinquents if brought in. There are other diffi-
culties in the way of the enforcement of the compulsory
education act, but it is unnecessary to occupy space in
referring to them. Indeed, the fact that the act has
remained a dead letter so long is. of itself, sufficient
reason for looking for some more practical way for
enforcing attendance upon the schools."
Superintendent Draper requested Sherman Williams,
then Superintendent of Schools at Glens Falls, to in-
vestigate the subject of compulsory education. Dr.
Williams, in conformity with this request, did so and
in an able report, of date December 2, 1887, concluded
that New York should at once take comprehensive, de-
cisive and mandatory action upon the matter, but it
was not until 1S94 that the present law was enacted.
It has since received some modifications and, as thus
modified, is incorporated in the consolidated school law
of 1902. It is greatly to the credit of Dr. Williams that
his recommendations are substantially embraced in the
law, the main provisions of which are as follows: All
children between S and 12 years of age. in physical and
mental well being, must attend public school for the
full yearly period; all children between 12 and 14 years,
at least SO days, and the entire time, if not regularly
and lawfully engaged in some useful employment; and
all between II and 1G years, for the full school period,
unless in employment as aforesaid; parents must cause
their children to attend school unless they can prove
their inability to compel such attendance, violation of
this requirement being made a misdemeanor punishable
by fine or imprisonment; it isalso made a misdemeanor,
with like alternative penalties attached, for any person,
firm or corporation to employ any child when, with the
foregoing definitions, it is imperative that he or she
shall be in school; the local school authorities shall
appoint, and may remove at pleasure, one or more
attendance officers, fixing their ( ompensation as a local
charge, who may arrest truant children and a magis-
trate may commit habitual and incorrigible ones to a
truant school, to be provided by the school authorities,
or such may be remanded to private schools, orphans'
homes, or similar institutions, controlled by persons of
the same religious faith as that of those in parental
7
9S Department of Public Instruction
relation to such children, to be there held until such
time as it may be practicable to assign them to the
schools they should lawfully attend ; the state superin-
tendent may withhold one-half of all public moneys
from any city or district which, in his judgment, will-
fully omits and refuses to enforce the provisions of the
law ; and he is authorized to employ such assistants as
mem^anfl ne ma J deem necessary to administer the law. As the
reports un- [ aw f igt)± f 00 ^ effect nearly coincidentlv with the
der the * '
compel- accession of the present superintendent, it became his
cation law duty to start its machinery and watch its workings.
of 1894 He at ouce a pp i n ted Arthur M. Wright as chief in-
spector, with A. Edson Hall and William J. Barr as
assistants. Messrs Hall and Barr are still in the
service, with John J. N. Byrnes as an additional assist-
ant. James D. Sullivan is chief inspector. Beneficent
results immediately occurred. From the first annual
report of Mr. Wright the following figures are taken :
Statistics of Towns
1893-1S94 1894-1895
Number of children between 5 ami 21 residing; in
the districts 723.440 694.917
Average number of days of school 175 173
Number of children registered as attending
school ~ 535,635 5H.730
Average daily attendance 313,109 328,580
Whole number of days attendance at school 55.S60.721 57,xi:\:ui
Per cent, of registration to number res ding in
the districts 74.04 77.95
Per cent, of average daily af tendance to num-
ber registered 58.45 60.65
Statistics of ('Hies
1893-1894 1894-1895
Number of children between 5 and 21 residing in
the cities 1.20S.SS5 1,251.328
Average number of days of school 196 1S7
Number of children registered as attending
school ' 5S9.333 616,613
Average daily attendance 407,995 429.114
Whole number of da.\s aiiei 79.669.04S 81,982,010
Per cent, of registration to number residing in
the district 48.75 49.28
Per cent, of daily attendance to number regis-
tered C9.22 69.59
In 1902 Mr Sullivan was enabled to say : " The
tables show for rural districts 13,491 less children, as
compared with 1901, and a decline in registration of
10,707, while the same tables show a gain in aggregate (
attendance of 517,903 and an increase in average daily
attendance of 2,255 ; and we also have a gain in average
daily attendance for the entire state of 35,241 giving
us the highest average daily attendance ever reached in
A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 99
the history of our schools. Other figures are equally
interesting as indicating how the compulsory law is
working out its marvelous results with less friction
annually ; 26,237 truants were arrested, as against
29,171 for the year 1901— a decrease of 2,934. These
figures might indicate a questionable relaxation in the
enforcement of the law, were it not for the fact that
we have an increase in average daily attendance of
35,211 for the same period as shown above. The num-
ber of parents prosecuted during the year, as compared
with 1901, also presents an interesting computation.
In 1901, 921 parents were prosecuted for violation of
the statute, Avhile but 679 were prosecuted during the
past year — a decrease of 245. Do not these figures
clearly indicate that parents and those in parental re-
lation are coming more and more to understand the re-
quirements of the law and cheerfully complying with
its mandates?" And the superintendent could say
also: " For the year 1S91 the per cent of enrollment to
school population was only 64, while for the school
year ending July 31, 1902, the per cent of enrollment
to school population was nearly 91 — a net gain of 27
per cent; and, while in making the computation, some
note is to be taken of the reduction of the maximum
school age from 21 to 18, yet the marvelous result of
27 per cent increase is largely to be credited to a
judicious enforcement of the law. Every year has
marked the steady ingathering from the streets into our
schools of thousands of neglected children, as well as
many more who were being illegally employed." The
superintendent sugg< sts the urgent need of at least two
state truant schools, or truant homes, and also that
the present laws should he so amended as to provide
that, after careful investigation by an attendance offi-
cer, a requisition from the board of education or trustee
for books and clothing to enable poor children to attend
school should be promptly honored by local poor
authorities, and the same be made a legal charge
against the town.
The superintendent has noted, during his term, with Adornment
satisfaction, the growing public interest taken, not only g^und^ 1
in the improvement in school structures throughout the
state, but also in the efforts made and taste displayed
in beautifying their surroundings. Something of this
is to be attributed to the exercises of Arbor day and the
100 Department op Public Instruction
trend thus imparted and something to the consecration
of generous-hearted citizens, in that behalf. Special
acknowledgment, as the superintendent observes in his
annual report (1903), is due to Professor John W.
Spencer, head of the bureau of nature study in Cornell
university, for his incitement to teachers and pupils to
adorn school grounds with trees and shrubbery and
flowers. In 1902, Prof. Spencer received reports from
500 school districts which, through his encouragement,
had made their grounds attractive. For several years,
by the liberality of the Hon. William A. Wadsworth,
of Geneseo, the superintendent has been able to offer
cash prizes — $ 100 for the best kept school grounds and
$50 for the second. These prizes have been duly
awarded and photographs of the grounds thus selected
have appeared with the annual reports of the Depart-
ment. In 1902 also, the Youth's Companion, of Boston,
gave United States flags to the 20 school districts
and, in the current year, six sets of historical engrav-
ings to the 500, manifesting the most interest and enter-
prise in adorning their grounds. These agencies, and
such as these, are tokens of a movement which will go
on until all our school grounds shall " blossom as the
rose."
romeii * n * lie barter of Cornell university, it was stipu-
unfversity hired that in return for the permission to that institu-
state " tion to receive the land scrip granted to the state, by
shii?s ar " the act of Congress, July 2, 1865, it should " annually
receive students from each assembly district, free of
any tuition fee." The university was disposed to con-
strue the intention of the legislature to be that each
district was entitled to but one student, at the same
time, but the state authorities insisted that one should
be admitted each year. The university yielded the
point, and 512 free scholarships were thus provided,
upon competitive examination, under the regulation of
the superintendent. Until 1887, however, not one-half
of these scholarships were filled. In that year a law
was passed awarding scholarships left vacant in any
district to candidates in other districts. Thereafter
the number was kept full, and. if any student left
before graduation, the superintendent filled the vacancy
from eligible names in the list of contemporaneous can-
didates. By the Constitution of 1894, the number of
assembly districts was enlarged from 128 to 150; but,
therein
A REVIEW OF ,"S ADMINISTRATION 101
at the first, the superintendent ordered the Cornell ap-
pointments upon the original basis, believing that the
university had equities in the ease which deserved con-
sideration. He recommended to the legislature that the
free assembly district scholarships should be increased
to GOO and that the state should establish at Cornell
a state pedagogical department, or school of pedagogy,
for the professional training of college graduates, and
others of equivalent standing, in the theory and prac-
tice of education, thus training them for positions as
teachers in high schools, academies and normal schools,
or as superintendents of schools. The state took no
action, but the superintendent, in 1900, felt constrained
to grant 150 scholarships, and the university again
yielded, reserving, however, its equities in the premises
and claiming that the cost of the tuition of 600 students
would be $175,000 a year, while the income of the pro-
ceeds ($688,570.12) was but $31,428.80. This is the
existing status. The superintendent still believes that
in justice to Cornell and for the welfare of education,
the state should support a school of pedagogy there.
It may be added that there is a department of pedagogy
in Cornell, consisting of a professor and a lecturer, both
of whom are paid by the university.
In 1903, the superintendent discusses at some length The^Bibie
the question of reading the Bible in the public schools, public
He is loath to adhere to the ruling of his predecessors
in relation thereto. He alludes to the decision of
Superintendent Weaver, supplemented by nearly every
superintendent since, that " no teacher has a right to
consume any portion of the regular school hours in con-
ducting religious exercises, especially when objection
is raised;" but says that the Weaver decision, in the
specific case, was against religious exercises, according
to the usage and practice of a religious sect and that
" there is a vast distinction between exercises of that
character and the reading of the Bible without note
or comment." He finds that a recent decision of the
supreme court of Nebraska, often referred to as pro-
hibitory of Bible reading in the schools, is precisely
in line with that of Superintendent Weaver, and that
such reading is either authorized or permitted in nearly
every state of the union, California alone constitution-
ally prohibiting it, and the attorney-general of Wash-
ington having written an opinion adverse to it. The
102 Department of Public Instruction
reading is not generally practiced in Louisiana, Nevada,
Idaho, Oregon or Utah. The school law of New York
is silent concerning it, but by special statutes the board
of education of the city of New York is forbidden to
exclude the reading of the Scriptures, without note or
comment, in its schools. He says distinctly that "local
authorities are empowered by the school law to estab-
lish courses of study to be followed by the schools under
their charge. I think this may fairly be construed to
include the opening exercises of such schools, subject,
of course, to the right of appeal to this Department
from an abuse of this power by local authorities.
Whenever the practice thus established shall violate
the provisions of the Constitution, and the opening
exercises or course of study, as prescribed by them, shall
include the teaching of any sectarian tenet or doctrine,
I should feel impelled, in case of appeal, to prohibit
such exercises. But where the Scriptures are read, as
the statute provides they shall be in the city of New
York, without note or comment, by a public school
teacher in a public school of this state, in the presence
of Hie pupils thereof, as part of the opening exercises,
I shall deem it my duty to rule that such practice is
not in violation of Hie Constitution or statutes of this
state." He refers approvingly to a volume of " Read-
ings from the Bible selected for schools," consisting of
selections from the Old and New Testaments, prepared
by a committee of four, of whom a member of the
Roman Catholic communion was one, and to whivh a
Jewish rabbi gave valuable assistance, and suggests
that this work might be used in the schools, wherever
the reading of the Bible is a cause of contention.
"•Sca'uL During nearly the whole period of the service of the
present superintendent various plans for the unifica-
tion of the two great departments of education have
been proposed, and have been prolific of much serious
and some acrimonious discussion in educational circles,
official and popular assemblies and the press. The late
constitutional convention expended much time upon
the subject, in the hearing before the committee on edu-
cation of proponents of many and diverse schemes, and
to debate upon the floor, but was unable to formulate
a declaratory article thereon, limiting itself to con-
ferring constitutional entity upon the regents, re-
affirming the mandate to the legislature to maintain
A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 103
free schools and the inviolability of the school funds
and prohibiting state aid to denominational schools.
In the agitation of the last decade, the superintendent
has been involved necessarily, restricting himself, how-
ever, to the vindication of two principles, which he re-
gards as cardinal and fundamental, viz.: that, wiih or
without unification, the statutory functions of the
Department must be preserved intact and public sec-
ondary education must be remanded wholly to its super-
vision and control. He would draw tin 1 line of
demarcation clearly and determinedly between tax-
supported and non tax-supported schools. This would
be at once a democratic and intelligent definition of
the province of each department and an allaying of
friction between the two arising, and that only, from
the dual jurisdiction of tax-supported secondary educa-
tion that has heretofore obtained. Regarding the ad-
ministration of his department ;;s a sacred trust, he can
do no less than uphold it in its integrity, and ho seeks
to do no more. His attitude is that of defense and not
of aggression. Thus he says, in 1899 : " The legislation
of 1853 permitting the organization of academic depart-
ments in certain public schools is primarily responsible
for this anomalous condition of our school system.
* * * The public school, maintained by public
taxation, no matter where it is situated, ought to be
under the supervision and control of a single depart-
ment of the state government. To maintain two
departments to perform the work, which could better
be done by one, with greater economy to the stale and
more efficiency, is so plainly unwise and against all
principles of government, that it is surprising, not only
that the state ever entered upon the system in 1853,
but that it has continued it so long, and that too, when
there is plainly a. natural line of demarcation between
the work to be done by these two departments."
Since 1898, a number of bills of various tenor, pro-
viding either for demarcation or for unification, have
been introduced in the legislature, one proposed by the
state statutory revision and one emanating from a com-
mission appointed by Governor Roosevelt. To both
these, the superintendent accorded his assent, inasmuch
as they recognized the line of demarcation upon which
he has, from the first, insisted. Bills under the
auspices of the regents, and others under those of the
104 Department of Public Instruction
superintendent, have also been before the legislature,
but none has reached a vote in either house. Dur-
ing the year 1903 the superintendent, upon con-
sultation with and the approval of leading educators,
including college presidents, normal school principals
and city superintendents, matured a plan embodying
the following features : the creation of a state board of
education consisting, at the beginning, of nine members
of the board of regents, to be selected by lot, with
respective terms of from one to nine years, also deter-
mined by lot, with future members to be chosen by the
legislature, each for nine years, with each judicial dis-
trict of the state finally to be represented; such board
to elect a commissioner of education, to serve during
its pleasure, choice not to be limited to any present
citizen of the state, who shall be its executive officer,
having general supervision of primary, secondary and
higher education, with power to create such depart-
ments as, in his judgment, shall be necessary, and to
appoint deputies, subject to the approval of the board;
neither the State Superintendent, any member of the
present board of regents, nor any person holding an
appointment under either to he eligible as I he first
commissioner; the first commissioner (the board
appointing his successors, as indicated) to be either
named in the bill or elected by I he legislature; and the
board of education, which shall also be the board of
regeuts, reserving to itself the right to adopt regula-
tions, confer degrees, guard the entrance to the legal,
medical and all oilier professions, (he granting of char-
ters to higher educational institutions, with such other
powers as it now possesses, nut specially vested in the
commissioner. The main features of this plan were
incorporated in a bill introduced in the assembly by
Mr. L. L. Davis and referred to the committee on pub-
lic education. Meanwhile the legislature of 1903 had
appointed a joint committee to investigate the subject
of educational unification and report to the legislature
of 1904. Of this committee Senator Merton E. Lewis
was chairman. That committee made an elaborate re-
port which was transmitted to the legislature Febru-
ary 3, 1904, and a bill, subsequently amended in certain
details, was introduced in both houses of the legisla-
ture and is now a law. Its principal provisions are. as
follows: The corporation designated by the constitu-
A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 105
tion as " the University of the State of New York "
shall be governed and its corporate powers exercised by
eleven regents, the same to be elected by the legisla-
ture from those previously holding such offices, and so
far as may be one from each judicial district, for terms
respectively of one, two, Ihree, four, five, six, seven,
eight, nine, ten and eleven years, from the first day of
April, 190-1, the terms of regents, previously in office,
terminating on said first day of April except as before
provided. Successors to the regents thus elected are
to be chosen by the legislature in the second week of
February in each year. Within ten days after the
passage of this act, the legislature shall elect a com-
missioner of education, who may or may not be a
resident of the state of New York. He shall receive
an annual salary of $7,500 and $1,500 in lieu of travel-
ing and other expenses. He shall enter upon the per-
formance of his duties April 1, 1901. He shall serve
for the term of six years, unless sooner removed for
cause by the board of regents, and the legislature shall
fill any vacancy that may occur during such period of
six years, and all successors in office after such term
of six years, shall serve during the pleasure of the board
of regents. The offices of Superintendent of Public
Instruction and secretary of the regents are abolished
from April 1, 1901, and their powers and duties shall
be exercised and performed by the commissioner of
education. All the powers and duties of the board of
regents in relation to the supervision of elementary and
secondary schools, including all schools except colleges,
technical and professional schools, are devolved upon
the commissioner of education, who shall also act as
the executive officer of the regents.
It has, of course, been noted that in the statistics defectives' "*
that have been herein tabulated, appropriations to
schools for defectives and for Indians have been in-
cluded. This review would be incomplete if some addi-
tional facts concerning these were not presented. The
formal connection between the public school system of
the state and institutions for the education of defec-
tives dates from the establishment of the Department
of Public Instruction. In 1818, private benevolence
opened a school in New York city for the instruction
of deaf-mutes according to methods recently developed
in Europe. In 1833, a school for educating the blind
106 Department op Public Instruction
was similarly established in the same city. In both
these institutions certain pupils had been maintained
at public expense, but, previously to 1853, there had
been but liltle systematic utilization of their advan-
tages. Among the powers and duties, devolved upon
the Superintendent of Public Instruction, were the
appointment to these two institutions of pupils to be
supported by the state, and a general oversight of their
care and education. These appointments, however,
were restricted to those who had been residents of the
state for three years, and who were between the ages
of 12 and 25. The institutions are first mentioned in
the report of the superintendent for 1855, when there
were 10!) pupils in the school for the blind and 204 in
that for deaf-mutes. In response to successive recom-
mendations of state superintendents, the minimum
age limit was reduced to eight years and finally to five,
while the maximum for deaf-mutes was abolished, but
the three years' residence 1 requirement remained, until,
in 1903, it was reduced to one year. In .March, 1807,
a school was opened in New York city, chiefly through
Hebrew benevolence for "the improved instruction of
deaf-mutes according to the articulate methods of
Germany." Tn 1870, the city leased to the institution
a site at the corner of Lexington avenue and Sixty-
seventh street for !>!> years, at an annual rental
of one dollar. Buildings were erected and it was
authorized to receive state 1 and county pupils. In 1870,
the Le Couteulx St Mary's school for the deaf was
opened at Buffalo, and in 1S72 was allowed to receive
public pupils. In L875, a school for deaf-mutes was
established at Rome, chiefly at state expense, and, in
1876, another was opened at Rochester by private
benevolence. In 1870, also, St Joseph's institution for
the instruction of deaf-mutes was founded at Fordham
by a society of Roman Catholic women. All these
schools were authorized to receive state and county
pupils. The same year, St Joseph's institute at Ford-
ham occupied new buildings which it had erected upon
a farm at Westchester, exclusively for hoys. For the
school year of 1002-3 there were reported in attendance
at all the schools for deaf-mutes 1,41)5 pupils, and at
the schools for the blind, 321. This increase from 204
of the former and 109 of the latter, since 1854, is due
not only to the growth of population, but to the removal
A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 107
of age restrictions, and the growing popular interest
in the education of these unfortunates. In methods of
instruction, (he New York schools have been among
the foremost to devise or adopt the best. The Kochester
school has acquired a national reputation for discard-
ing all sign language, and depending upon the oral and
manual methods of expression, together with reading
and writing. The Department of Public Instruction
has not usually interfered with the technical methods
of the different schools, yet it did once enforce a change
in the New York institution and the present superin-
tendent has demanded that prominence should be given
to the teaching of English, with which compliance has
in every instance been prompt and cordial. Industrial
education is a part of the work in every school. The
children are prepared to earn their living, and very
few of those taught in these institutions become
paupers. With the increase of population and the
greater care for the unfortunate, the calls upon the
institution for tin 1 blind steadily increased, at length
exceeding its capacity; and, in 1868, a state institution
was located at Batavia for children north of the
Harlem river. Appointment to this school was vested
in local authorities and its special supervision en-
trusted to the State Board of Charities. Hence,
although the law imposed upon the superintendent the
same oversight, as in respect to the other schools for
defectives, it was not exercised by the superintendent
until the last year when the inspector of the Depart-
ment visited the institution and found it in excellent
condition, its working being substantially along the
same lines as that of the New York school.
Previous to 1846, the state made no special provision schools for
for the education of Indian children. There were a Imlians
few mission schools and the children were permitted
to attend the public schools of the towns embracing the
reservations. The school authorities of these towns
were also allowed to enumerate the Indian children in
drawing public money. The schools, being located for
the convenience of the whites, were accessible to but
few of the Indians. The injustice of granting public
money, on the basis of children who could nor reach
the schools, led to an act in 1846, restricting the
enumeration of Indian children to those who had
actually attended school three months in the preceding
108 Department op Public Instruction
school year. Another law, enacted in 1846, marks the
beginning of educational care of the Indians. It pro-
vides for building schoolhouses and appropriates an
annual sum for the support of schools for five years on
four reservations, as follows : Allegany $300, St Regis
|200, Cattaraugus $350, Onondaga $250. It was con-
templated that the Indians should contribute both to
the erection of the buildings and to the support of the
schools. It is stated that they manifested much
gratitude for the promised aid. By the census of 1845,
there were 3,753 Indians in the state, of whom 984
were between the ages of six and sixteen years. By the
census of 1900, there were more than 5,000. In 1847,
a house was built and furnished at St Regis at a cost
of 1250, and one at Onondaga for $337.50. Schools
were opened in both, the following year, the one at St
Regis attaining an. average attendance of 50 out of
81 children in the district. In 1848, the Indians con-
tributing $300, a $000 schoolhouse was erected at
Cattaraugus, and one built by the state on the Allegany
reservation. The same year $240 was appropriated
and the town of Southampton, L. I., was required to
contribute $80 annually for two years, for the support
of a school for the Shinnecocks. In 1849, this school
was carried on for six months, with a teacher employed
at $12 a mouth, and a later report tells of a teacher in
the same school at $2 a week. In 1855, two schools
were opened on the Tonawanda reservation and one
among the Tuscaroras, the Indians contributing liber-
ally toward the buildings. In 1857, two schools were
established for the remnant of the Oneidas, who, though
their lands had been allotted in severalty, were too
poor to sustain schools of their own. These schools
were supported until 1889, when they were discontinued
on recommendation of Superintendent Draper. The
first schc/ol for the Poospatucks Avas not established
until 1875.
The act of 1856 placed the Indian schools under the
direct charge of the Superintendent of Public Instruc-
tion. The number of districts has gradually increased
to meet the necessity of accommodating the children.
In 1866, there were, exclusive of the two for the
Oneidas, 23 schools each with one teacher. As more
and more children were brought into the schools, other
teachers were added at Onondaga, and new districts
A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 109
formed on the other reservations. The latest of these
districts are the fifth in 1889, and the sixth in 1899, at
St Regis, the fourth at Tonawanda in 1900, and the
seventh at Allegany in 1903. The building for the last
will be completed so as to open a school in the spring
of 1901. There is also a necessity for two new dis-
tricts on the St Regis reservation. In the Indian, as
in the white schools, careful supervision is of the
utmost importance. At first, the schools were in the
hands of the state agents and special commissioners
for building the houses who acted concurrently with
representative Indians. Later, local superintendents
were appointed with powers analogous to those of
boards of education, but subject to the direct approval
or veto of the State Superintendent by whom they were
appointed. Some of these local authorities were, from
the first, intelligent, conscientious men, but others
studied only their own interests, and " graft " was
practiced at the expense of the Indians. The present
local superintendents are all practical educators,
honest and capable. Their powers, however, have been
limited by lack of funds and the impossibility of keep-
ing the central authority in touch with the actual con-
ditions. The same difficulty was found in dealing with
other state schools where support was had directly
from Albany. The Superintendent of Public Instruc-
tion therefore, in January, 1900, appointed an inspector
of normal schools, giving him also charge of the Indian
schools and schools for defectives. Results of his over-
sight have been given in the annual reports of the
Department. He found most, of the Indian school-
houses out of repair and meanly furnished. Sen is were
uncomfortable, blackboards, charts, globes and maps
lacking, and the books entirely unadapted to the wants
of the children. The grounds were uninviting and the
outhouses dilapidated and untidy. So rapidly as funds
would permit these evils have been remedied. Two
new schoolhouses have been built and three more are
approaching completion. The out-buildings are clean
and neat. Charts and kindergarten material have been
supplied and the old textbooks replaced by modern
ones.
As early as 1852, the state appropriated f 1,000 for
the support of Indian children to be educated at the
normal schools. They came gladly and made fair
110 Department of Public Instruction
progress, but it was reported that they " flocked
together," and the next year, a similar appropriation
was made for their education at academies, not more
than two being allowed at the same institution. In
1854, another experiment was made appropriating
$1,000 for the education of Indian youth at farms and
in country schools. None of these later experiments
were successful and the state returned to the normal
school plan, and has most of the time supported one or
more Indian youths who were taking the regular course
in these schools preparatory to teaching. Siuce the
establishment of Government schools for Indians at
Hampton. Carlisle and Philadelphia they have been
quite extensively patronized by New York Indians.
So also have the Quaker boarding school at Tunessasa
and the Thomas Orphan Asylum near Versailles. A
few children also at lend the public schools near the
reservations, or in places where the parents are tem-
porarily located. There are reported, for the past year,
in these various schools, aside from the district or state
schools, 363 pupils. It may be added that many of the
Indian normal graduates have made excellent teachers
for their own people.
The following are the statistical and financial reports
for the year ending July 31, 1003, the close of the ninth
year of the present administration :
Statistical
Cities Towns State
Statistics Number of districts 1,043 10,683 11,726
for tne last Number of teachers employed for 160 (lavs
year of or more 16 633 15 g 20 34450
Superin- Number of children of school aire 1.264.431 476.329 1,740,760
temleiit Number of male teachers em]. loved 1.937 2,972 4,909
Skinners Number of female teachers employed 2n.7u0 14,216 34.916
adminii- Number of children in attendance 827.541 429.333 1.256.874
• ration Average daily attendance 630,855 297,480 9_s.33.".
Visitations of commissioners 11,815 11,815
Number of volumes in libraries 719,691 998. 2;0 1,717,951
Number of log schoolhouses 15 IS
Number of frame schoolhotises 176 9,553 9,729
Number of brick schoolhouses S61 997 1,838
Number of stone schoolhouses 6 290 296
Whole number of schoolhouses 1,043 10,835 11.878
Financial
Receipts Cities Towns State
Amount on hand August 1, 1902. $17, 334, 554 93 $640,293 54 $17,974,S48 47
Amount apportioned to districts 1,943.326 60 2,044,730 31 3,938,056 91
Proceeds of gospel and school
lands 6,016 60 32.819 19 38.S35 79
Received from board of regents. 131.760 91 154.9138 63 2S6.679 57
Raised by tax 23,804.549 87 5,211.37) ■»! 29,075,920 51
Teachers' board 7.09S 89 7.098 89
Tuition 44,050 44 186.612 62 230.663 06
Other sources 7,651.72326 610.678 71 8.262,40197
Total $50,975,9S2 61 $8,8SS,522 56 $59,864,505 17
A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 111
Tayments Cities Towns State
For teachers' wages $18,509,203 19 $5,461,963 50 $23,971,166 G9
Tuition to districts under con-
tract 38.46175 38,46175
Transportation to districts un-
der contract 24,818 84 24,818 84
Libraries 69,997 00 ns.-'.is us 158,295 08
For school apparatus 1,133,528 01 61,210 46 1,194,738 47
For school houses, sites. re-
pairs, etc 8.926.964 17 984,959 26 9,911,923 43
Forfeited in supervisors' hands 880 26 880 26
For free textbooks 115,449 50 115,449 50
For all other expenditures 4,479,444 62 1,522,917 21 6,002.361 S3
Amount on hand July 31, 1903... 17,741,396 12 703,013 20 18,446,409 32
Total $50,975,982 61 $8,888,522 56 $59,864,505 17
Deducting' from the total under the head of pay-
ments the amount on hand it appears that the actual
expense of the common schools of the state for the year
ending July 31, 1903 was $41,418,095.85. The average
annual salaries of teachers in the cities, for the last
school year was $992.08, in the towns $345.26 and in
the state $695.76; the average weekly salaries in the
cities was $25.44, in the towns $10.10 and in the state
$19.65. The average annual cost per pupil, based on
average daily attendance was, in the cities $52.68, in
the towns $27.51 and in the state $14.62; the average
annual cost per pupil, based on number of children
attending school was in the cities $40.16, in the towns
$19.06 and in the state $32.95; the average annual cost
per pupil based on total population, census of 1900,
was in the cities $6.78, in the towns $3.46 and in the
state $5.70. The value of schoolhouses and sites was
in the cities $82,174,215, in the towns $17,491,026 and
in the state $99,668,241. The total cost of maintain-
ing the normal schools was $406,675.92, and the average
cost per graduate of these schools (for 1902) was
$356.21. The average cost of each graduate from train-
ing class and school was $68.71. The cost of main-
taining teachers institutes was $11,416.14, and for each
teacher in attendance $2.28. The expenses of Indian
schools were $14,198.78, of schools for defectives $269,-
154.65, of pictorial instruction $38,000, and of enforcing
the compulsory education law $15,473.89. The
teachers' licenses held were state 1,187, college graduate
751, normal diplomas 7.317, training class or school
8,459, local and commissioners' 19,867. The average
length of the school term was in the cities 195 days,
in the towns 171 and in the state 177. The districts
observing Arbor day were in the cities 45, and in the
112 Department of Public Instruction
towns 9.74X ; the number of trees planted was in the
cities 729 and in the towns 14,370. The number of
children committed to truant schools was, in the cities,
1,260, and in the towns 96; the number of truants
arrested by attendance officers was in the cities 27,671)
and in the towns 778 ; the number of parents prosecuted
was 613 in the cities and 37S in the towns. The total
number of pupils registered in all departments of nor-
mal schools (for 1902) was 9,284, the number in normal
departments only, 4,341, and the number graduating
was 1 ,046. The number of training classes and schools
(1903) was 118 j the number attending the same 2,559,
and the number of certificates issued 1,494. The num-
ber of teachers institutes was 111 and the number of
teachers in attendance 8,099. The number of private
schools in the state was 867, with an attendance of
188,484.
ti"™ P s a ta*tis- The tremendous growth, during the existence of the
ties and Department of Public Instruction is seen in two items
cuncla- x
sions alone— in that the schools, in 1853, cost but $2,469,-
248.52 and $1,931,870.18 were expended for teacher's
wages, as against $41,418,095.85 and $23,971,166.19
respectively in 1903. With these latest data of the
Department, this review nears its end. The history of
the common schools of New York has been traced from
their beginning in 1633, in the humble domicile of
Adam Roelandson, in New Amsterdam to their present
magnificent development. While, it is believed, that
nearly every phase of that development has been
touched upon, if not fully described — with the excep-
tion of the curriculums to which an expert treatise
should be devoted — particular stress has been laid upon
the financial aspects, as they have revealed themselves
successively, from the slender stipend allotted to the
first schoolmaster by the Dutch West India Company
to the two score million dollars and more now expended
for popular education by this imperial commonwealth ;
and, as a measure of progress, there is none more
accurate than that of money. What the schools were
doing at any given date may be fairly discerned by what
they were costing. Are the children being gathered in
the schools; is the number of illiterates decreasing; are
sightly buildings being erected, and do they improve
in design, appointments and utility; are teachers re-
ceiving due compensation ; are they more and more
A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 113
dedicated to their calling; are standards of education
exalted, and are the facilities the system affords com-
mensurate with its constantly expending needs? All
these questions and others that might be asked are
answered in the statistical and financial tables that the
superintendents have collated, a considerable number of
which have here been reproduced, and which record the
onward course of education as precisely as the ther-
mometer marks the degrees of temperature.
In conclusion, it is submitted that the claim of the
educational supremacy of New York, preferred at the
outset, has been sustained by the facts adduced. First,
in population, in manufactures, in commerce, in wealth
and in the arts of civilization, she is also first in the
training of her youth for the vocations of life and the
obligations of citizenship. She founded the common
school in the land; she unified its government in a
headship, with powers from and responsibility to her
alone; she has employed the most effective agencies
f'or its betterment; if she has not originated all meas-
ures for its advancement, she has been prompt in
adopting those elsewhere initiated, enlarging their
scope and perfecting their application; and she has
been open-handed in its support until throughout her
borders, the school bell rings for all her children, with-
out distinction of sex, color, or condition, her latest
mandate being that the doors of the high schools shall
open " without money and without price " to all, who,
irrespective of their residence within the state, desire
to enter them. From this review, the commanding
position which the Department of Public Instruction
has had in the educational progress of the state is
clearly apparent. That which has been wrought in this
regard, within the last fifty years, far exceeds all that
had been accomplished in the two hundred and twenty
years preceding. Much of this progress is to be
ascribed to the larger enlightenment that came with the
advancing years of the nineteenth century and much
t'o the abundant means that the state has provided,
but much also is due to the fact that the common school
system has been under a separate department of the
government, invested with large, and even extraordi-
nary executive, administrative and judicial functions,
for the exercise of which it has been amenable only
to the sovereign state. At the close of these fifty
S
114 Department op Public Instruction
memorable years of organization and achievement the
Department of Public Instruction ceases to exist, but
it is believed that under the Commissioner of Education
its jurisdiction will not be restricted nor its powers
abridged, and that he will be true to its inspiration
and historic leading.
VICTOR M. RICE
Victor Moreau Kice, the first and fourth Superin-
tendent of Public Instruction, the son of the Honorable
William Rice, originally from Washington county, but
one of the early settlers in Chautauqua, was born at
Mayville in the latter county, April 5, 1818. Having ob-
tained his preliminary education in the schools of his
native town, he entered Allegheny college, at Meadville,
Pennsylvania, and was graduated from that institution
in the class of 1841. In 1842, he studied law in May-
ville, and continued it at intervals, being admitted to
the bar in 1815. In 1813, he removed to Buffalo and was
employed as teacher of Latin, language, penmanship,
and bookkeeping in a private school which subse-
quently became the Buffalo high school. In 1815, he
opened an evening commercial school for clerks and
young men with daily occupat ions. From 1816 to 1818,
he was the editor of the Cataract afterward the
Western Temperance Standard, but resumed teach-
ing in the latter year. In L852, he was elected city
superintendent of schools. In 1853, he was president
of the New York teachers' association, with which, for
several years, he had been prominently identified. In
1851, he became the first State Superintendent of Pub-
lic Instruction, and the work of organizing the depart-
ment devolved upon him. Features of his first
administration were the creation of the office of school
commissioner and the compilation of the Code of
Public Instruction. Returning to Buffalo, he was
elected, as a Republican to the assembly of 1801, in
which he was chairman of the committee on college:'.,
academies and common schools. In 18G2, he was
again elected Superintendent of Public Instruction and
was reelected in 1865. He was especially interested
in the establishment of Indian schools, and was form-
ally adopted by the Seneca tribe and named Sagowada
(the big tree). The conspicuous achievement of his
VICTOR M. RICE
Superintendent 1854-1857, 1862-1868
HENRY II. VAN DYCK
Superintendent 1857-1861
A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 115
later service was that of the abolition of the rate bill —
the making of the common schools of the state abso-
lutely free. Upon retiring from the superintendency in
1868, he became president of the American Popular Life
Insurance Company and was afterward president of
the Metropolitan Bank of New York City until his
death which occurred October 18, 1869.
HENRY H. VAN DYCK
Henry Herbert Van Dyck, the second Superintendent
of Public Instruction, was born in Kinderhook, Colum-
bia county, N. Y., in 1809. He received his education in
the schools of Kinderhook and, at an early age, was
apprenticed to the printers' trade, which he acquired
before he was twenty-one years old. Upon attaining
his majority, he became the editor of the Goshen
Independent Republican. He was subsequently one
of the owners of the Albany Argus. His early politi-
cal affiliations were with the Free Soil wing of the
Democratic party. He was prominent in the revolt of
that element, under the lead of Martin Van Buren,
in 1848. against the regular nominations of the party,
which contributed to the election of President Taylor,
but joined the Republican party upon its organization,
and was a candidate for presidential elector on the
Fremont ticket in 1856. He was elected Superin-
tendent of Public Instruction in 1857 and reelected
in 1860 serving until April 9, 1861, when he resigned
to accept the appointment of State Superintendent of
the Banking Department, in which capacity he re-
mained until August 9, 1865, when he was made assist-
ant United States Treasurer, in New York, by President
Johnson. This position he resigned in 1869 on account
of failing health. His health being restored he became
president of the American Safe Deposit Company and
was acting as such at the time of his death January
22, 1888, at the age of 79 years. He was also for a time
president of the Erie Transportation Company. In the
various financial trusts, which he discharged, he was
highly esteemed and useful.
116 Department of Public Instruction
EMERSON W. KEYES
Emerson W. Keyes, the third Superintendent of Pub-
lic Instruction, in the eighth generation of the Keyes
family in America, was born in Jamestown, Chautau-
qua county, where his father had settled in 1S20, on
the 80th of June 1828. At the age of 16, he began
his teaching career in a district school in his native
county. He was graduated from the Albany normal
school in 1818, meanwhile supporting himself by teach-
ing in various places. Immediately after graduation,
he taught at Castleton-on-the-Hudson and in 1849 he
taught in the Genesee and Wyoming seminary, Alex-
ander, N. Y., of which Norman F. Wright, father of
the present second Deputy Superintendent A. M.
Wright, was then principal. In 1850 he took charge
of the department in English in Homer academy. In
1856, he was engaged in the public schools of New York
city. In 1857, he was appointed by Superintendent
Van Dyck, Deputy Superintendent of Public Instruc-
tion and served as such until April 9, 1861, when,
upon the resignation of Mr. Van Dyck he became acting
superintendent and filled out the term, retiring in
April, 1862. He was a candidate for the succession
in 1862, but was defeated in the caucus of his party
by a majority of three votes. He was deputy superin-
tendent under his successful competitor, Victor M.
Rice, for the ensuing two years. In 1865, he was
appointed Deputy Superintendent of the Banking
Department of the state, in which he remained eight
years, being acting superintendent for several months
toward the close of the period. He was admitted to
the bar in 1868, and, upon leaving the Banking Depart-
ment, practiced his profession in New York, until he
was, in 1883, appointed chief clerk in the office of the
Superintendent of Schools in Brooklyn, which position
he retained until his death, October 17, 1897, at the
age of 69 years. Mr. Keyes was an author of wide
repute upon educational, banking and legal subjects,
and a public speaker upon various themes. Among his
publications are the " History of Savings Banks in the
United States," "A Special Report on Savings Banks,"
" The Code of Public Instruction in the State of New
York," and " Principles of Civil Government, Exempli-
fied in the State of New York." He also edited
I§#p fig*
EMERSON W. KEYES
Superintendent 1861-1862
ABRAM B. WEAVER
Superintendent 1808-1874
A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 117
" Keyes's Court of Appeals Kecord," in four volumes,
and prepared and revised the article on " Savings
Banks," in Johnson's Cyclopedia. His last public
address was that on the occasion of the fiftieth anni-
versary of the founding of the State normal college
in Albany, June, 1891.
ABRAM B. WEAVER
Abram B. Weaver, the fifth Superintendent of Public
Instruction, was born in Deerfield, Oneida county,
which has always been his legal residence, on the 18th
of December, 1830. He was the son of George M.
Weaver and Delia Bellinger, both of whom were
descendants of the German stock which first settled
the Mohawk valley. His father is reputed to have
been the first white child born in Oneida county. His
preliminary education was in the common school of
his town and in Utica academy, in the latter under a
most excellent classical teacher, George Spencer. In
September, 1847, he entered Hamilton college and was
graduated with the class of 1851. He pursued some
legal studies in college, under that distinguished in-
structor, Professor Theodore W. Dwight, and, after
graduation, resumed his preparation for the bar in the
office of Spencer and Kernan in Utica. He was ad-
mitted to the profession in 1853, but was engaged in
active practice for only a few years. When the present
system of school supervision was introduced, he was
appointed school commissioner for the first district of
Oneida county by the board of supervisors, in 1856,
and, in the fall of 1857, was elected to the same office,
by popular vote, for the further term of three years.
He accepted the nomination of the Democratic party
for the assembly, in the first district of Oneida county,
in 1861, and was defeated by the rejection of a few
clipped ballots, but was returned to that body, the
ensuing year, and served therein during the sessions
of 1863, '64 and '65. In the latter year, he was the
candidate of his party for speaker. He was made a
trustee of Cornell university in 1865, and assisted in
organizing that institution, serving until 1874. He
practiced law in the city of New York from 1865 to
1868, in partnership with Judge James Matthews and
was appointed by the court an examiner of candidates
118 Department op Public Instruction
for admission to the bar. In 1868, he was elected
Superintendent of Public Instruction and was re-
elected in 1871. While superintendent, it devolved
upon him to organize six of the eight normal schools
then authorized by law. Since his retirement, he has
lived on his ancestral home in Deerfleld, frequently,
however, being requested to accept political preferment.
He was the candidate of his party for representative
in congress in 1870, for state senator in 1885, and for
presidential elector in 1900. In 1902, he was again
nominated for congress, but declined to make the
canvass.
NEIL GILMOUR
Neil Gilmour, the sixth Superintendent of Public
Instruction, was born at Paisley, Scotland, on the 18th
of January, 1810. He was prepared for college in his
native land, came to this country in 1856 and, enter-
ing Union college, was graduated from that institution
with the class of 1860. He worked his way through
college and for a year after graduation, taught in the
academy at Corning. He then went to Ballston
Springs, which was thereafter his home, and taught
for several years in the academy in that place, of which
his brother, the Rev. James Gilmour was the principal.
He early became interested in politics and was in
frequent demand as a speaker at the meetings of the
Republican party, with which he was identified. In
1866, he was elected school commissioner for the first
district of Saratoga county, and was again elected in
1872. Before the expiration of his latter term, he was
chosen Superintendent of Public Instruction and
resigned as commissioner to accept the higher prefer-
ment. He was reelected superintendent in 1877 and
in 1880, being the first superintendent to hold for three
consecutive terms. Shortly after his retirement and,
under the administration of President Arthur, he was
appointed registrar of the land office at Bismarck,
N. D., and discharged the duties of that office, until
his resignation upon the incoming of President Cleve-
land. Returning to Ballston, he accepted the position
of general manager of the Aetna Life Insurance Com-
pany for the state of New York and acted as such
until 1896, after which he engaged in the practice of
NEIL GILMOUR
Superintendent 1874-1883
WILLIAM B. RUGGLES
Superintendent 1883-1886
A REVIEW OP ITS ADMINISTRATION 119
law until his death March 31, 1901. He was an attrac-
tive public speaker and Mas closely associated with
the life of his community, being, at the time of his
death a director of the First National Bank, a trustee
of the Cemetery Association and also of the Ballston
Springs Improvement Association.
WILLIAM B. RUGGLES
William Benjamin Buggies, the seventh Superinten-
dent of Public Instruction, the son of William and
Mary Buggies, was born in Bath, Steuben county, May
11, 1827. He attended the public school in Bath, but
at the age of thirteen was in a printing office in his
native village, trying lo work his way up from the
case to the higher education. In 1816 he entered
Hamilton college at the beginning of the sophomore
year, and was graduated with high honors in the class
of 1819. Soon after graduation he went to Atlanta,
Georgia, and became the editor and publisher of the
Atlanta Intelligencer a leading Democratic journal
of the south. In 1851 he was elected and in 1855 re-
elected an alderman of the city of Atlanta, and thus
began his long and varied political career. Disposing
of his paper, four years before the outbreak of the
civil war, he came north, and in 1857 began the study
of law in the school connected with Hamilton col-
lege, under the direction of Theodore W. Dwight. He
was admitted to practice in the summer of 185S, contin-
ued his legal studies in the office of Judge Charles 11.
Doolittle, in Utica, for about a year, and, in 1859, com-
menced the practice of his profession in Bath, in which
he rapidly gained distinction. In 1X07 he was chosen a
trustee of Bath, and in 1876 and 1877 was a member of
assembly from Steuben county. In that body he was
a member of the judiciary committee and was especially
prominent in the discussion of educational topics,
taking ground in favor of the abolition of the normal
schools.
In 1878 he was appointed first deputy attorney-
general under the Hon. Augustus Schoonmaker, and
was continued in the place by the Hon. Hamilton Ward,
who was not of the same political faith as himself.
In 1883 he was elected Superintendent of Public
120 Department of Public Instruction
Instruction and served nearly through the term,
resigning, however, January 1, 1886, to accept the posi-
tion of deputy superintendent and legal counselor of
the New York State Insurance Department under
Superintendent Maxwell, and remained in that capac-
ity until 1891, when he resigned.
He continued to reside in Albany until his death,
January 1, 1902. He had published official reports to
the legislature, opinions under the school laws, and
addresses delivered before various educational institu-
tions. He was a delegate to the Democratic National
Convention at St. Louis in 1876, which nominated
Samuel J. Tilden for the presidency.
JAMES E. MORRISON
James Edward Morrison, the eighth Superintendent
of Public Instruction, was born in the city of New
York in 1843 of parents of Irish ancestry. His pre-
liminary education was obtained in the public schools
of the metropolis and he was graduated from the col-
lege of the City of New York in 1861, and from the
Columbia university law school in 1869. He taught
in Christ's Church academy at Oyster Bay; in gram-
mar school 19, New York city and was subse-
quently and until January, 1879, professor of history
and belles-lettres in the college of the City of New
York, when he resigned to become private secretary
to Mayor Cooper, which position he held for two years.
He then served a short time as member of the board
of police commissioners of the City of New York, and,
in 1882, represented the sixteenth district of New York
county in the assembly. He served as Deputy State
Superintendent of Public Instruction under the Hon.
William B. Ruggles, from April 7, 1883, until January
1, 1886, when he became State Superintendent, upon the
resignation of Mr. Ruggles, and acted as such until the
expiration of the term, April 7, 1886, on which date
he was appointed Chief Examiner in the State Civil
Service Commission and continued as such until his
sudden death in Buffalo, whither he had gone to con-
duct examinations, June 14, 1887, at the age of 44
years. A meeting of his friends was held at the
capitol, in Albany, over which the Hon. Charles R.
Skinner presided, and suitable resolutions commemora-
JAMES E. MORRISON
Superintendent 1886
ANDREW S. DRAPER
Superintendent 1886-1892
A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 121
tive of his work were adopted, and a committee was
appointed to attend his funeral. In addition to his
political and educational preferments, Mr. Morrison
was known as an orator and writer upon various
subjects and as a scholar of more than ordinary
attainments. He was highly esteemed in the Masonic
Fraternity and for a time, was at the head of the New
York Grand Chapter of Royal Arch Masons. He con-
tributed to the press many articles and editorials on
Masonic Law, in which he was regarded an authority.
He was a member of the Democratic State Committee
for many years and was reading clerk of the Demo-
cratic National Conventions of 1880 and 1884.
ANDREW S. DRAPER
Andrew Sloan Draper, of Puritan and Scotch-Irish
lineage, the son of Sylvester Bigelow and Jane Sloan
Draper, was born in Westford, Otsego county, N. Y.,
June 21, 1848. When seven years old, the family
moved to Albany. His early education was in the
common schools of Westford and Albany. He entered
the Albany academy in 18G3 and was graduated there-
from in 18GG. The year after graduation, he was a
teacher of mathematics, bookkeeping, etc., in the West-
ford Literary Institute. In the winter of 1867-68 he
taught mathematics in the Albany academy, and, the
next year was principal of the graded school in East
Worcester, Otsego county. He was engaged for four
summers in the Albany office of C. & D. Whitney,
a large lumber firm, and traveled extensively for it
through the Atlantic coast states. This was followed
by a course of study in the Albany Law School (Union
university) from which he received the degree of LL.B.
and was admitted to the bar in 1871. He formed a
partnership with his cousin, Alden Chester, now a jus-
tice of the New York Supreme Court, the firm becom-
ing later Paddock, Draper and Chester, and again
Draper and Chester. He was also deeply interested in
politics, having begun to make Republican speeches ns
early as 1868. In 1876 he was president of a uni-
formed political club of 600 members called th*
" Minute Men," from 1880 until 1883 president of th«
Albany Grant club of 3,000 members and was ire
quently a delegate to local and state conventions of his
122 Department of Public Instruction
party. In 1880 he became a member of the Albany
county Republican committee and was its chairman for
three years. In 1883 he was elected to the Republican
state committee and was the chairman of its executive
committee in 1S84, and was also a delegate to the
Republican National Convention of 1884. In 1878, he
was chosen a member of the Albany board of educa-
tion and served therein for three years, and was for
a time a trustee of the State normal college. He was
a member of the New York assembly in 1881, serving
on the committees of Ways and Means, Judiciary, Pub-
lic Printing and Public Education. In 1884, he was ap-
pointed by President Arthur a member of the court
of Alabama claims — a court to hear and determine the
individual claims against the $15,500,000 awarded by
the High Tribunal at Geneva under the treaty of Wash-
ington with Great Britain. He was elected State
Superintendent of Public Instruction in 18S6 and was
reelected in 1889. During his tenure he accomplished
a number of educational reforms and had national
reputation as an educator. He was superintendent of
instruction in Cleveland, Ohio, 1802-94, and has been
president of the University of Illinois since 1894. The
University advanced from a faculty of 90 and a student
body of 750 in 1894 to a faculty of 420 and a student
body of 3,800 in 1904. In March, 1S9S, he was elected
superintendent of schools of the Greater City of New
York, but declined the position. In 1904, he was
elected commissioner of education for the State of New
York, entering upon his duties April 1. He was
awarded the silver medal at the Paris Exposition for
his monograph on the " Organization and Administra-
tion of the American School System," and is the author
of a book on the war with Spain, entitled " The Rescue
of Cuba.' 5 He received the degree of LL.D. from
Colgate in 1889 and from Columbia in 1903. He is
widely known as a speaker and writer, especially upon
educational topics.
JAMES F. CROOKER
Superintendent 1 892-1 895
A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 123
JAMES F. CROOKER
James F. Crooker, the tenth Superintendent of Pub-
lic Instruction, was born in the hamlet of Christian
Hollow, in the town of Onondaga, in the county of
the same name, August 12, 1834. He is of New Eng-
land origin, his family being among the settlers of
Stratford, Conn. His father was a farmer, nearly all
his life, dying at a good old age in 1890. His mother's
maiden name was Elizabeth Yates, a descendant of
Governor Joseph C. Yates, of this state. She died in
L838. In 1830, the parents of James F. Crooker re-
moved to Erie county, where nearly all his life has
been passed. His early education was acquired in the
schools of his neighborhood and, at the age of sixteen,
he taught a district school in the same vicinity. He
subsequently studied in the Springville academy, from
which he was graduated in 1853. He then accepted
a position in a mercantile house in New York city,
which he was compelled by ill health to resign, after
a service of about three years. He returned to Erie
county and, after recuperating his health at the pater-
nal homestead, became the principal of one of the
smaller schools of Buffalo and as the principal of
a number of the schools in that city remained a teacher
for about twenty years. In the fall of 1881, and while
principal of No. 31, the largest school in the city, he
was elected superintendent of education of Buffalo for
a term of two years, and was reelected four time3,
more than once receiving majorities considerably in
f excess of other candidates upon the same ticket — the
Democratic. In the eleventh year of his local super-
intendency he was chosen by the legislature State
Superintendent of Public Instruction, in February,
1892, and served until the end of the term in April,
1895. Since retiring from the superintendency, he has
filled a number of local offices in Buffalo, and was once
the candidate of his party for the city superintendency
of schools.
CHARLES R. SKINNER
Charles Rufus Skinner, the eleventh Superintendent
of Public Instruction, son of Avery and Charlotte
Stcbbins Skinner, was born in Union Square, Oswego
county, August 4, 1844. He was educated in the com-
1.24 Department op Public Instruction
nion schools of his native town, the Mexico academy
and the Clinton Liberal Institute. From 18G7 until
1870, he was engaged in business in New York city.
He then settled in Watertown, Jefferson county, and
from 1870 until 1874 was the business manager of the
Watertown Daily Times. He was elected, as a Kepub-
lican, to the assembly of the state of New York, for
the years 1877, 1878, 1879, 1880 and 1881 ; was a mem-
ber of several important committees and frequently
participated in the debates of that body. In 1881, the
Honorable Warner Miller having resigned his seat in
the house of representatives, upon being chosen a
United States senator, Mr. Skinner was elected to fill
the vacancy thus created in the forty-seventh congress,
and was reelected to the forty-eighth, in 1883. In 1886,
he was appointed by the Honorable Andrew S. Draper
Deputy State Superintendent of Public Instruction
and served as such until 1892; in that year he became
supervisor of teachers' institutes and teachers' training
classes, under Superintendent Crooker; in 1S95, he was
chosen by the legislature State Superintendent of Pub-
lic Instruction and was reelected to the same office in
1898 and 1901. He was president of the National
Educational Association in 1896. He has delivered
many addresses at political, patriotic and educational
gatherings and is the author of " Commercial Advant-
ages of Watertown, N. Y." (1876) ; New York Ques-
tion Book" (1S90) ; "Arbor Day Manual" (1891) and
" Manual for Patriotism for the Schools of New York "
(1900) . He received the degree of Master of Arts from
Hamilton college in 1889, that of Doctor of Laws from
Colgate university in 1895, and that of Doctor of
Letters from Tufts college, Massachusetts,, in 1901.
CHARLES R. SKINNER
Superintendent 1895 1904
|