■f THE PUBLIC SCHOOL HISTORY OF COMMON SCHOOL/ EDUCATION IN NEW YORK FROM 1633 TO 1904 BY CHARL.ES E. FITCH Prepared under the direction of Charles R. Skinner, Superintendent of Public Instruction J. B. LYON COMPANY, PRINTERS ALBANY, NEW YORK D367111-N4-1000 EDUCATIONAL HISTORY A History of the common school in New York B Biographical sketches of superintendents of public instruction MAY 24 i905 i). ot 0. A History of the common school in New York Prepared by Charles E. Fitc« under the direction of the Superintendent of Public Instruction It is fifty years since the Department of Public Instruction was instituted. A review of its adminis- tration during that period is pertinent at its close as is also reference to what was done for education in New York previously thereto. In the development of popular education in the ™* ^'V United States, New York is entitled to primacy in two New York respects — the genesis of the common school system and supervision of the same by the state. That system has been defined and promoted by various commonwealths and aided by grants from the federal government, until there are throughout the union schools free to all, con- serving a patriotic citizenship and assuring an en- lightened nation, but it is from New York that the chief leadings, those of public provision for their maintenance and central authority for their conduct have proceeded. The first public school in the country was that which J*,f J^ st was begun in New Amsterdam in 1G33 with Adam Roelandson as its master. Precedence in this regard must be accorded to the Dutch colony of New Nether- land. Other colonies followed, if they were not stimu- lated by, its example. There can be no dispute as to the chronological order. It is said but not shown that New Eng. a school existed in the town of Plymouth in 1633, and schools one in Marshfield in 1615. In 1G73, fifty-three years after Plymouth Rock was sighted, the court ordered the setting up of a sehool to be supported by the revenue from the Cape fishery. Boston, in Massachusetts Bay, in 1C35, " at a general meeting upon public notice " voted "that our brother, Philemon Pormont shall be entreated to become schoolmaster for the teaching and nurturing children with us," but there is no evidence that the request was acceded to. The next year " at a general meeting of the richer inhabitants, there was given towards the maintenance of a free schoolmaster for the youth with us, Mr Daniel Maud being now also chosen thereunto." In 1611 it was ordered that Deare Island should be occupied for the keeping of a free school (so called) for the town. In 1643, Dedham set apa^*t sixty acres for the use of the church and a free Department of Public Instruction school. In 1643 Roxbury allowed £20 a year for the support of a schoolmaster, to be raised out of property bestowed by certain of its inhabitants, and a little later Charlestown, Cambridge, Dorchester, Ipswich and Salem made similar arrangements. In 1642, the Gen- eral Court ordered that children should be brought up to learning and labor, imposing fines upon parents and others who neglected their duty in these particulars, and on November 11, 1647, it passed the celebrated statute, which is sometimes assumed to be the precursor of all school legislation in the land and, with preamble, quaint and fantastic now, but sincere and serious then, revealing the theocratic inclination of its framers, decreed that in order to thwart the designs of " that old deluder Satan," " every township in this jurisdic- tion after the Lord hath increased them to the number of fifty householders, shall then forthwith appoint one within their town to teach all such children as shall resort to him to write and read, whose wages shall be paid either by the parents or masters of such children, or by the inhabitants in general, by way of supply, as the major part of those that order the prudentials of the town shall appoint." Connecticut, with settlement beginning in 1634, soon thereafter gave attention to educational matters; Hartford, in 1642, appropriating £50 annually for a school, in which the tuition fees were 20 shillings a year, the children of parents unable to pay being instructed at town charge; and, in the code of laws adopted in 1650, the Massachusetts ordi- nance of 1647 was incorporated verbatim and made imperative upon all the towns. New Haven, shortly after its settlement, in 1637, enjoined the deputies in each plantation to see that all parents and masters, either by their own ability and labor, or by employing such schoolmasters and other agencies as the plantation might afford, should have their children and appren- tices taught to read the scriptures and other books in the English tongue, and those who failed in their duty were to be fined, and, if they continued contumacious, their charges were to be placed in the hands of those who would better educate and govern them. The town of New Haven, in 1642, ordered that a free school be set up and a schoolmaster, Ezekiel Cheever, was presently hired at £20 a year, his salary being subse- quently increased to £30, and in 1657 the General Court ordained that every plantation should provide a school- A rbtikw or r-rs administration 3 master, one-third of hi* salary to be paid by the town and two-thirds by the parents or guardians of the pupils. The territory of Connecticut was enlarged in 1665 by the absorption of New Haven, and various school laws were matured, that of 1G78 requiring that towns of thirty families should keep a school " to teach children to read and write " being the most precise in its man- dates. Other colonies laid the foundations of their common school systems respectively as follows: Rhode ^""Jjjt 1 Island in 1640; New Hampshire in 1649; Delaware in tions gen- 1657; Pennsylvania in 1683; Maryland in 1694; Vir erally ginia in 1752. These dates determine the precedence of New Nether- land in planting the elementary school in American soil. She was the pioneer. Nor was this merely the accident of primordial settlement. In the evolution of the republican state, the Dutch anticipated their neighbors in appreciating responsibility for the education of the young and in designing the measures necessary to that so™of "~ end. The Pilgrims, notwithstanding their sojourn in I? nt ?" a,ld ° » J Puritan Holland and the inspiration there extended, made, as inspiration has been seen, long delay. The Puritans came to the Atlantic coast in considerable numbers in 162S, and the great migration occurred in 1630. Among the laymen there were those of high intellectual endowments; many were of comfortable estate; some possessed large wealth ; while the clerical element, paramount in influence, was specially able and liberally educated. Within twelve years from the landing at Salem, there were eighty ministers in Massachusetts who had been ordained in the church of England and who were nearly all graduates from Cambridge university. The Puri- tans were a compact and homogeneous body, well equipped and well organized, with a definite object in view. That object was to found a Christian state in the new world — " to raise a bulwark against anti- Christ " as John White, the chief promoter of the enter- prise, declared. To this all their thoughts were directed * and all their energies were devoted. They brought with them English ideas, customs and institutions, among which was not the common school. That was the creation of succeeding years. The people in Eng- land knew nothing of the common school and the English people who came to America did not bring it with them. The charter, wrested from the king, with its distinct enunciation of corporate rights and privi 1 Department of Public Enstruction leges, construed by its grantees as adequate for the government they fashioned, embraced no educational warrant. Although Henry Hudson ascended the river, which bears his name, in 1609, it was not until twenty years The settle- later that the real settlement of New Netherland began. New ivetn- New York owes her being, not to lofty religious senti- ment, as does New England, nor to passion for stirring- adventure, as does Virginia, but to Dutch genius for trade. But growth was, at the first, slow. In 1G29 the inhabitants consisted only of the little company of Walloons, who had come over in 1G24 and tbe servants of the West India company, grouped at trading posts from Manhattan io Beverwyck (Albany), who were wholly engrossed in exchanging baubles and trinkets for furs with the Indians and returning inordinate profits to their employers therefrom. There were in the territory three or four small forts, but there were no mechanical industries, no tilling of the earth except for the bare necessities of the scanty population, and but feeble attempts at the making of homes. The com- pany had, in 1621, been granted a monopoly of tra le on the coasts of Africa and America and invested with almost sovereign powers by the States General of the United Netherlands, the latter retaining some control by commissioning the governors and demanding reports from them, but experience had shown that no benefits accrued to the plantation beyond those from the com- merce in peltries and that the interests of the company would l»e enhanced, as it was also (dear that the resources of the company could be utilized, only by stimulating colonization. With the larger outlook, charter of came the charter of freedoms and exemptions issued by amiVv-"* the company June 7. 102!), to all such as should colonize emptions^ ^ eyy Netherland. This instrument was singularly inconsistent in its articles. While it asserted the liberties of the individual and guaranteed him certain notable immunities of person and property, its conces sions of immense manors confirmed feudal tenures and customs, exalted caste, magnified proprietary fran- chises and grievously vexed colonial and even state administration far into the nineteenth century. Its invitation to immigration, however, was a broad one, becoming more generous in 163S, when each settler was promised as much land as he could cultivate, was granted practically free trade with the mother country, A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION » and equal justice was pledged to all inhabitants and visitors, in civil and criminal proceedings. Under these benign behests, the earth yielded its harvests, thrift followed frugality, communities expanded and law reigned. But the distinguishing and now illustrious feature of the charter of 1629 was the prescription concerning education. It was that " the patrons and colonists £**ai d prel shall in particular, and in the speediest manner, scription endeavor to find out ways and means whereby they may support a minister and schoolmaster that thus the service of God and zeal for religion may not grow cool and be neglected among them, and they shall, for the first procure a comforter of the sick there." This was the first educational edict in America. 1 1 was reaffirmed substantially in the " New Project of Freedoms and Exemptions " in 1630, and in 1638 it was made obligatory that " each householder and inhabi- tant shall bear such tax and public charge.as shall here- after be considered proper for the maintenance of clergymen, comforters for the sick and like necessary officers and the director and council there (New Nether- land) shall be written to touching the form hereof, in order on receiving further information hereupon, it be rendered the least onerous and vexatious ;" and, in 1640, the company assumed formally certain responsibilities which, indeed, it had already generously borne, in these "words: "And no other religion shall be publicly admit- ted in New Netherland, except the Reformed, as at pres- ent preached and practiced by public authority in the United Netherlands, and for this purpose the company shall promote and maintain good and suitable preachers, schoolmasters and comforters of the sick." Spiritual instruction was, of course, dictated, as was the rule in all Protestant lands, and the divorce of church and state was yet remote, but in these several rescripts, the means by which the cost of the common school was defrayed, for more than two centuries, were indicated. Thev were public largess, general taxation, Early , , , , '. , . „ , , , . , methods and ratable tuition fees, and upon this scheme, no of support- essential improvement was made, until the free school, Jj , o s n ednca- in its integrity, was willed by the people. It is not contended that these agencies were operative concur- rently and continuously for the whole period, nor that there were not lapses in their application at certain I imes and places, but, in larger or lesser measure, either Department of Public Instruction The Dutch school :i public school Definition of tlie conL rami school suffice system separately or jointly, they obtained throughout, and the credit of founding the public school in America must be conceded to the Dutch and particularly to the policy of the Dutch West India company, itself derived from the methods which had long prevailed in Holland and made it the most thoroughly educated nation in Europe. Henri Taine says : " In culture and instruction, as well as in the arts of organization and government, the Dutch are two centuries ahead of the rest of Europe;" and if this is true now, it certainly was then. It is sug- gested that the early Dutch school in New Netherland was not a public school, in the American acceptation, as not conforming to the definition of such " as estab- lished, supported and controlled by the people acting in their political capacity as a civil body politic.'' This definition formulated to fit a case in a controversy as to primacy is narrow and misleading. The inquiry does not depend so much upon the manner in which the American school had being as upon what manner of school it was — not whether it was appointed by the public but whether it was conducted for the public. The question is not as to whether New York, under the West India company and the States General, had less or more of popular government than Massachusetts, under the theocracy and its articles of incorporation. It is as to which served the cause of popular education the sooner and the better. Magna Charta is an in- delible sign manual of human freedom, even if it was forced from the sovereign by feudal barons, with their hands on their swords, and was not of parliamentary persuasion. Although the schools of Prussia were of autocratic dispensation, they are free in fullest mean : ng and broadest view. The narrow definition does nol An accurate statement of what the common school system is has been framed by President Andrew S. Draper. It is a system of "schools for the common welfare and the public security, supported by public moneys, managed by public officers, in which all the people have common rights and which are free from whatever may offend conscience or abridge those rights;" and, as the Educational Review says, "the germ of this system is to be found in the schools estab- lished by the early Dutch settlers in New Amsterdam." Inasmuch as two clergymen of the Reformed church, Sebastian Crol and John Huyck, ministered in 1626 in New Amsterdam, when it numbered barely one hun A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION i died souls and as, in the infant Dutch communities, ^^"'h. the parson and the pedagogue might be one and the ™£°°J~ same, it is a fair inference that either or both of these instructed the young and that the keeping of school began in the year mentioned, an inference which is strengthened by the fact that the colonial estimate for 1625 included the salary of a schoolmaster at 360 florins, but no record to that effect, remains. The Dutchman was not so diligent a chronicler as the Puritan who tallied every step he took and wrote history as he made it. The educational data of New Netherland are sadly deficient. The opening, however, of the school by Roe- landson, in 1633, is amply authenticated and it has a long and honorable history. The succession of its trus- tees and teachers has been preserved. With occasional interruptions, it was continued as a public school dur- ing the Dutch ascendancy, ceased as such with the English occupancy, in 1664, being thereafter sustained by the consistory of the Reformed church, under the direct supervision of its deacons, was discontinued dur- ing the revolutionary war, was reorganized in 1783 and is still in existence as the school of the Collegiate Re- formed church in the city of New York. In 1652, New Amsterdam obtained a municipal char- ^I^er 1 * 001 * ter and a second school was inaugurated. The city was Dutch rule to manage its own finances and was directed to pay all official salaries, including those of the schoolmasters, but it neglected to do so and, two years later, the colonial government resumed the collection of taxes and their disbursement. As towns were erected on Long Island and the Hudson, it was the uniform prac- tice to reserve lots for school sites, and houses were built thereon. Thus there were public schools at Flat- bush, Newtown, Hempstead, Southampton, Brooklyn, Esopus, Albany and other places, and licenses for pri- vate schools were freely issued. For the last eighteen years of Dutch rule, Petrus Stuyvesant was director- general, and that doughty w r arrior and stern execu- tive seems to have been deeply impressed with the im- portance of the common school as related to the weal of the state. His deliverances in its behalf were not infrequent. In his proclamation of September 22, 1647, proposing the appointment of nine men as tribunes or advisors to himself and his council from a list of eight- een nominated to him by the inhabitants, he stated his reasons therefor, as follows : "Whereas, we desire noth- Department op Public Instri The natnral order of scliool establish- ment ing more than that the government of New Nethcrbnd, entrusted to our care, and principally New Amster- dam, our capital and residence, might continue and in- crease in good order, justice, police, population, pros- perity and mutual harmony, and be provided with strong fortifications, a church, a school, trading place, harbor and similar highly necessary public edifices and improvements, for which end we are desirous of obtain- ing the assistance of our whole commonalty, as nothing is better adapted to promote their own welfare and com- fort, and as such as is required in every well regulated government." He wrote earnestly to the classis of Am- sterdam "for a pious, well qualified and diligent school- master" for "nothing" he adds "is of greater importance than the right, early instruction of youth." In November of the same year, he announced to the nine men that the company could contribute a portion of the sum needed for educational purposes and that it would continue such aid regularly "to promote the glorious work" prom- ising also that a schoolroom and a dwelling for the master should be supplied during the ensuing winter. In 1658, he welcomed Alexander Carolus Curtius and informed the company of his arrival. "We hope and confide" he said, "that the company shall reap gnat benefits from it for their children, for which we pray that a bountiful God may vouchsafe his blessing." Rec- tor Curtius came as the principal of a Latin, or gram- mer school, which the company provided. The Dutch observed the natural order in their educa- tional economy. They attended first to the elementary and next to the secondary department. The latter, they held, was the sequence of the former. They did not plan the college, because of lack of means and possibly because they thought that individual incentive and patronage would suffice for it when it should be demanded. Indeed. New York, as a state, has been quite consistent in its adherence to the voluntary prin- ciple in higher education. Aside from a few gifts in the earlier stages of its development, now wholly dis- continued and for denominational institutions consti- tutionally inhibited and certain recent provision for courses in practical industries, the state has, while exer- cising a mild supervision over its colleges and profes- sional schools refused pecuniary assistance to them. The amount heretofore donated, exclusive of $305,000 derived from lotteries, is less than $450,000, the last A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION appropriation — $25,000 — being to the Elmira female college in 18G7. The chief concern of the state is for the common school. Both the Puritan and the Cava- lier reversed the natural order. The primal educational enactment in Massachusetts was an appropriation of £000 to Harvard college, for which, as fitting students for the ministry, the theocracy always evinced the liveliest solicitude; and, in Virginia, the charter of Wil- liam and Mary antedated, by over sixty years, any legis- lation for institutions of a lower grade. Throughout his administration, Stuyvesant continued to manifest an interest in education, and, at its close, public schools existed in nearly every town and village, imparting in- struction in Latin, Greek, mathematics, reading and writing — drill in the catechism not being omitted— through the medium of the Dutch vernacular and, toward the end, through the English tongue also. Under the rule of the English, the common school J t !' b e ools languished in New York, such of its life as lingered H£ d ^ . being mainly referable to the insistence of certain Dutch rule communities upon its sustenance by taxation; and, it is noteworthy that, during the brief Dutch reoccupa- tion, care was again bestowed upon it by the provincial authorities. In December, 1073, it was ordered by Gov- ernor-General Colve and the council that all the inhabi- tants of the town of Bergen, which was then within their jurisdiction, should pay their share for the sup- port of the precentor and schoolmaster, and, in May, 1074, it was further ordered that the sheriff proceed to immediate execution against all persons who still declined to pay. As Daniel J. Pratt says in his An- nals of Public Education, " the foregoing action on the part of the governor and council seems to have fully settled and confirmed the policy of the Dutch admin- istration in regard to free public schools supported solely by taxation, and w T hich, but for the reconquest by the English, might, perhaps, have continued without interruption to this day." It is not to be inferred, as has already been intimated that elementary education perished utterly under English rule. In 1(105, Governor Nicolls licensed one John Schutte "for the teaching of the English tongue" at Albany, upon the ground that such teaching was necessary to the government, and upon the condition that he should "not demand any more wages from each scholar than is given by the Dutch to their Dutch school- 10 Department ok Public Instruction master." It is not a violent assumption that defi- ciencies in his compensation were to be made up in the Dutch manner. In 1671, Governor Lovelace directed the justices of the peace, constables and over- seers of the town of Hempstead to cause speedy pay- ment to be made to Richard Charlton of the arrears of his salary as schoolmaster, according to the terms of the contract made with him by the town. In 1691, immediately succeeding the so-called Leisler rebellion, Richard Ingoldesby, commander-in-chief of the province of New York and the honorable council ordered that Jorst de Baane, the schoolmaster of New Utrecht, should re- ceive the salary duehim as such, and that no other school- master should officiate in the town without a license from the government. This order was in compliance with a petition of the resident justice of the peace and the min- ister setting forth that because De Baane had refused to side with the rebellion, certain ill-affected persons had compelled him "to forsake the place, although the land, out of which the schoolmaster and reader of the town is maintained, was given to the town by the said justice, out of his proper estate." The school, started in Flatbush in 1659, was continued until 1802, when it was absorbed in the academy. The list of its teachers has been preserved, as also have the articles of agree- ment of the town with two of these — Jan Tibout, in 1681, and Johannes Van Ekkelen, in 16S2 — from which it appears that each was to receive a salary of 400 guilders, in addition to tuition fees, and perquisites for bell-tolling, the delivery of funeral invitations and other functions vested in his office. The schools that were licensed by the early English governors, especially by Lord Cornbury, may be regarded fairly as public ones. Among these were the license to Thomas Huddleston, on the 5th of December, 1705, "to teach the English language, writing and arithmetic, in the town of Jamaica, Queens county" and that to Thomas Jeffrey, on the 17th of April, 1706, " to keep and teach school within the city of New York and to instruct all children with whom you shall be intrusted in the art of reading and arithmetic for and during my (Oornbury's) pleas- ure;" and, in July, 1712, authority was given by Gover- nor Hunter to Allane Jarratt "to teach writing, arith- metic and navigation and other parts of the mathe- matics to all such persons as shall be desirous to be Instructed therein within the oity or province of New York." A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 11 Any account of education in New York would be™* y s £; r singularly incomplete which did not, at least, allude the Propa- to the service rendered it by the Society for the Pro pa- tiie Gospel gation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts. It was and part» re sn still is a missionary body of the church of England. Organized in 1701, its object, as stated, in 1730, by its secretary, the Rev. David Humphreys, D. D., was two-fold, to wit, "to unite the growing generation in their language, as well as in their religious principles." The school was to do battle for the supremacy of En- glish speech and the ecclesiastical order. The society bestowed annual stipends upon its schoolmasters, ranging from £10 to £40, the first school being located at Rye in 1704. Between that year and 1775 it em- ployed about 60 teachers, schools being maintained in the counties of Albany, Suffolk, New York, Richmond and Westchester. The pupils were mainly the children of poor parents and included quite a proportion of slaves and some Indians. In addition to supplying teachers, the society offered in 1728 to found a library in New York city, provided the books it donated should be cared for properly. Governor Montgomery laid the proposition before the assembly, which promptly ac- cepted it, with a vote of thanks, and assurance that a bill should be passed for the preservation of the volumes when they should arrive. They came, but the assem- bly failed to redeem its promise and no further action in the premises was had. The society did excellent ser- vice, which it is proper to recognize even at this distant day and to admit the claim that, with its ministrations, it has rightful place in the common school succession. Under English rule, the work of the society was con- scientiously prosecuted; certain Dutch schools, with the auspices and conditions indicated, remained in being and licenses were granted to English schools. It is significant that upon a map of the city of New York, made from an actual survey by T. Maerochalcken, in 17(33, both the Dutch and English free schools are designated. While, therefore, it is true that, with the latitude ^StSi of interpretation as to its quality, which has been sug- ■«* chari- gested, the common school did not become entirely ex- effort tinct, during the century that intervened between the surrender by the Dutch and the evacuation by British troops, it is true that it came near to dissolution. Whatever vitality inhered in it was due either to in- 12 Department of Public Instruction Develop- ment in New Eng- land and New York compared apiration purely local or to organized charitable effort. If two or three of the earlier royal governors exhibited some interest in it, their successors betrayed none. It was without system or supervision, sporadic instead of general, and lacked conspicuously governmental sanc- tion. Instances, however, occurred in which provincial legislatures, Dutch in their majorities, strove strenu- ously but ineffectually for its promotion as against the prerogative of the executive ; a bill was proposed in the assembly of 1G91 " to appoint a schoolmaster for the educating and instructing of children and youth to read and write English, in every town in the province," which came to naught. A paragraph in a letter of President Johnson of Kings college, to Archbishop Se; kei\ in April 1702. is worth quoting. Eeferring to the illiberality of the New York colonial authorities concerning educational grants he says: " It is a great pity when patents are granted, as they often are. for large tracts of land, no provision is made for religion or schools. I wish therefore, instructions were given to our governors never to grant patents for townships, or villages, or large manors, without obliging the patentees to sequester a competent portion for the subject of reli- gion and education." The wish of the good president was not realized. The English had no elementary school system in England, and their government had no obj< I in constructing one here. The English aristocracy, transplanted to and perpetuated in New York, was at one with royal authority in refusing to favor — indeed, in opposing actively — popular education. In its esteem, education was for the classes, not for the masses. For its rising generations, were fireside homilies, private tutelage and the training schools and universities of England and, from the middle of the eighteenth cen- tury, the colonial granimer school and college. It is. at this time, in the comparison, that New England becomes the superior of New York in the development of the common school. The Puritans were unlike the English who directed the course of the royal government in New York. They were of the same stamp as the men of Naseby and the Long Parliament. They were independent and democratic. If they were somewhat slow in breaking away from English preced- ent and thus failed in the initiative which the Dutch assumed, their pioneer conditions induced them to the departure, as they also led them to separate from the A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 13 church of England and to prescribe the Congregational communion. If they first set up the college and the secondary school, they later started the elementary school as the sentiment of the people asserted itself, and the common school once sanctioned was not per- mitted to decay; it was resolutely and consistently maintained. Three acts comprehend all that the colonial legis ^g'sfative lature of New York did for education from 1664 to acts of a century 1775; none of these related to the elementary school; two were in behalf of the grammar, or high school, and one was the appropriation to Kings college of certain moneys derived from public lottery and the excise reve- nue. On the 27th of November, 1702, an act for the encouragement of a grammar free school was passed and approved by the governor and council. It provided for the appointment by the governor, on the recom- mendation of the common council of the city, of a schoolmaster who should instruct the male children of French, Dutch and English parents in the English, Latin and Greek tongues, and also in the arts of reading and writing and that he should be paid the sum of £50 annually to be raised by taxation for a term of seven years. Under it, Mr. George Morrison, who seems to have been fairly successful in his calling, was commis- sioned and the school expired by limitation of the term. It was not until 1732 that the legislature took further action concerning secondary education. On the 14th of October in that year it passed "an act to encourage a public school in the city of New York for teaching Latin, Greek and mathematics," which was assented to by the governor and was, in several respects, an admir- able measure. It appointed, as master, Alexander Mal- colm, who had already afforded commendable proof of his abilities as a private preceptor, at an annual salary of £40 for a term of seven years, to be paid from the fund accruing from licenses issued to hawkers and ped- dlers and it distributed free scholarships to twenty youths from the various counties, to be named by the respective authorities of each in the following propor- tions : to New York ten, to Albany two, and to Kings, Queens, Suffolk, Richmond, Orange, Ulster and Dutchess each one. The school was in operation eight years, when it was discontinued, and, thereafter, sec- ondary education, throughout the province, depended upon individual benefaction and patronage. The two 14 Department of Public Instruction Snmmary prior to the state- hood of New York First attention to higher education The Re- gents of the Uni- versity acts have been cited, as the revelation, among other things, that for a time, at least, the law-making body regarded the high school as a public charge, setting an example, which modern legislation has largely followed ; and the grammar school could not have been considered, as it was in some of the colonies, a mere tender of the college, because it was more than twenty years after the second law was enacted that the college was char- tered. The review of education in New York, prior to the revolutionary war. is necessarily fragmentary and im- perfect, if not baffling, owing to the scantiness of the records, but from them the primacy of the Dutch in in- augurating the common school, its continuance by vari- ous expedients, weakening with the passing of the years, the rise and decadence of the public grammar school, the licensing of select and fostering of charity schools and the founding of the college appear with sufficient distinctness to warrant the statement that the line of popular instruction was never entirely broken. With independence and statehood, New York soion became prominent in the onward movement of education and her leadership has since been as pronounced as was the original impulse of the colony from which she sprung. As a state, however, she gave her first attention to higher and not to elementary education, according in this respect with the English provincial policy, her statesmen also who were fashioning the commonwealth being mindful of the conception of a university which Diderot and other French philosophers had enunciated in their writings. In response, therefore, to the appeal, which Governor George Clinton addressed to the legis- lature that convened immediately after the close of the revolutionary war; an act was passed, on the first of May, 1784, which vested in a corporation, The Regents of the University of the State of New York, all the rights, privileges, and immunities that had inhered in the governors of Kings college, which had been seriously embarrassed in its conduct and property by the war and the reorganization of which was urgently de- manded. The act also empowered the regents to found schools and colleges in any part of the state and to endow the same. The regents comprised the governor, lieutenant governor, president of the senate, speaker of the assembly, attorney-general, the mayors of New York and Albany, twenty-four persons named from the eleven A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 15 counties, and others selected by the clergy of the re- spective religious denominations, one from each body. On the 2(Jth of November, 1784, the act was amended by adding to the number of regents thirty-three others specifically named and providing that a quorum for the transaction of business should be nine, including the presiding officer — the chancellor. The board thus con- stituted was a cumbrous body (sixty-four, exclusive of the clerical representatives), was widely scattered and manifestly incompetent to perform its functions as trustees of the college. It soon recognized its own deficiencies and the neces- sity for remedial measures. A duly appointed com- mittee, upon which were Alexander Hamilton and Ezra L'Hommedieu, justly accredited as the authors of the university system that has since obtained, presented a report, which the board adopted, in which the defects of the law were clearly set forth and a plan of reorgani- zation was outlined. In this report a pregnant para- graph occurs which shows the appreciation entertained by the board of the obligation of the state to general as well as to higher education. This is its expression: "But before your committee conclude, they feel them- selves bound in faithfulness to add that the erecting of public schools for teaching reading, writing and arith- metic is an object of very great importance, which ought not to be left to the discretion of private men. but be promoted by public authority. Of so much knowledge, no citizen ought to be destitute, and yet it is a reflection, as true as it is painful, that but too many of our youth are brought up in utter ignorance." The main recom- mendations oif the committee were embodied in a bill, which became a law. on the 13th of November, 1787, and has remained substantially unchanged, except as the jurisdiction of the university has, from time to time, been enlarged, partly by force of the original measure and partly by special statutes, its field of work now in- cluding not only academies, colleges, professional and technical schools, but also libraries, museums, study clubs, extension teaching and similar agencies for home education. The law of 1787, repealing the prior acts relating to the university and directing the separate government of Kings, in it styled Columbia, college, cre- ated a body of twenty-one regents, of whom the gover- nor and lieutenant governor, for the time being, were two. In 1842 and 1854 respectively, the secretary of 16 Department of Public Instruction, state and the superintendent of public instruction were- made members ex officio, thus increasing the board to twenty-three. The remaining nineteen were named, to serve without compensation, their successors, as resig- nations or deaths should occur, to be elected by and to hold office during the pleasure of the legislature — a life tenure. rowers of The regents were empowered to charter colleges and regents to incorporate academies and to have supervision over the same, being authorized and required to visit and in- spect them, examine into the condition of education and the discipline therein and to make an annual re- port thereof to the legislature. They were to have au- thority to confer degrees above that of master of arts and to apply their estate and funds in such manner as, in their judgment, should be most conducive to the pro- motion of literature and the advancement of useful knowledge. In 1894, they were made a constitutional bi i ly, to be governed and its corporate powers exercised by regents whose number shall not be less than nine. By the legislation of this year, their number has been reduced to eleven, with tenures of eleven years each. The reorganized board is 117 years old, has been com- ponent, of many distinguished, and some illustrious, citizens, has uniformly been well officered, and has dis- charged its duties intelligently and efficiently. It has an honorable history and a wide jurisdiction — a juris- diction, however, which is limited by the sphere of the voluntary principle. It has had no connection with tax- supported education, except as it distributed the income of the literature fund and certain appropriations, by virtue of recent enactment, and visited and inspected high schools and academic departments of union schools. This exception, which was an anomaly, oc- curred by the resolution of these from the academies and by implication to those originally of public found- ation; but it has been set aside and supervision over tax-supported secondary education vested in the Commissioner of Education to whom it properly belongs. (ioTemor The first official utterance in favor of common schools cun'on the iu t nis state — that of the committee of the regents in tne n c d om-° f 1787 — ^as keen heretofore quoted. The regents re- inon school newed their recommendation to this effect in their state 1 " * e several reports to the legislature in 1793, 1794 and 1795. A REVIEW OF ITS VDMINISTRATION 17 But it was the behest of Governor George Clinton, more than any other persuasion, that induced the legis- lature to lay the foundations of the common school in this commonwealth. George Clinton, soldier of the revolution, statesman of the republic and the first, and for over twenty years, chief magistrate of the state of New York, had a keen appreciation of all that enured to its upbuilding. He was solicitous for its inter- ests and jealous of any invasion of its rights. His sturdy opposition to the ratification by New York of the federal constitution, because he believed that by it the state surrendered to the general government rights which it should have reserved unto itself, is explicable by his zeal in its behalf, his devotion to its autonomy, its welfare and its glory; and he certainly regarded the education of its youth as essential to these ends. It was at his suggestion that the University was in- corporated, as also that, in 1789, two lots, in each town- ship, of the public land thereafter to be surveyed was set apart for gospel and school purposes : and, in his annual message of 1795, are these memorable words: " While it is evident that the general establishment and liberal endowments of academies are highly to be commended, and are attended with the most beneficial consequences, yet, it cannot be denied that they are principally confined to the children of the opulent, and that a great portion of the community is excluded from their immediate advantage. The establishment of com- mon schools throughout the state is happily calculated to remedy this inconvenience, and will, therefore, en- gage your early and decided consideration." In con- formity with this injunction, " an act for the encour- The first agement of schools" in that year provided that **1 islatlve £20,000 should be annually appropriated for five years "for the purpose of encouraging and maintain- ing schools in the several cities and towns in this state, in which the children of the inhabitants residing in the state shall be instructed in the English language, or be taught English grammar, arithmetic, mathematics and such other branches of knowledge as are most useful and necessary to complete a good English edu- cation." The act regulated the quota by counties but, beyond this, the apportionment was made on the basis of the taxable inhabitants, and the supervisors of the counties were required to raise by tax in each town a sum equal to half of that received from the state. 2 1& Dbpartmknt op Public Instruction Provision was made for the supervision of the schools and for annual reports. Returns from sixteen out of the twenty-three counties, for the year 1798, show that 1,352 schools were then organized in which 59,660 children were taught. The law expired by its own limi- tation in 1800. In 1801 an enactment for the raising by lotteries of the sum of $100,000 was made. $12,500 thereof were to be paid to the regents, by them to be distributed to the academies and the remaining $87,500 were to be deposited in the treasury, to be disposed of for the benefit of the common schools in such manner as the legislature should determine. The comptroller was directed subsequently to invest the pro- ceeds in real estate. The principal responsibility for this act and for certain laudable attempts at educa- tional legislation, during the next few years, is ascribed to Jedediah Peck and Adam Comstock, who served together for an extended period in the assembly and senate and who were not liberally educated men, but notably sagacious, diligent and patriotic. The lot- teries, w T hich now seem an exceedingly objectionable device for advancing the cause, for which they were utilized, but which public sentiment then approved, were known as " literature lotteries " and existed until 1821 when, by the constitution, all lotteries w r ere pro- hibited. Land* de- Nothing further was accomplished, although Gov- ■chooi »ur- ornors Jay, Clinton and Lewis successfully recoin- po " e * mended action, until 1805, when the Legislature ordained that 500,000 acres of the vacant and unappro- priated lands of the state should be sold and the avails made a permanent school fund, when the interest thereon should amount to $50,000. In 1811, Governor Tompkins again called attention to the subject, and he w r as authorized to appoint five commissioners to report a plan for the organization and establishment of common schools. He named, as such commissioners, Jedediah Peck, John Murray, jr., Samuel Russell, Roger Skinner and Samuel Macomb, who, on the 14th of February, 1812, submitted a report, accompanied by the draft of a bill, which in the law adopted during the legislative session of that year became one of the most momentous steps ever taken in educational prog- ress, here or elsewhere. The outlines of the plan, as sketched by the com- missioners, were these : " That the several towns in*tbe A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 19 state be divided into school districts, by three com* missioners, elected by the citizens qualified to vote for town officers; that three trustees be elected in each district, to whom shall be confided the care and super- intendence of the school to be established therein; that the interest of the school fund be divided among the different counties and towns, according to their respec- tive population, as ascertained by the successive cen- suses of the United States; that the proportions re- ceived by the respective towns be subdivided among the districts into which such towns shall be divided, according to the number of children in each, between the ages of five and fifteen years ; that each town raise by tax annually as much money as it shall have re- ceived from the school funds; that the gross amount of monejs received from the state and raised by the towns be appropriated exclusively to the payment of the wages of the teachers; and that the whole system be placed under the superintendence of an officer ap- pointed by the Council of Appointment." It is from this last mentioned article that New York The second ■••i t • ednca- derives her second educational primacy, in a state sys- tionai pri- tem with a single responsible head. Its wisdom has been jJ , e a ^ y Yoru vindicated by the experience of ninety years, and her leading therein has been followed by every state in the union. In some other respects, the commissioners ad- mit that from the common school systems of neighbor- ing states they had gathered much important informa- tion, but in this respect they learned nothing from others. They created. One section of the law, that which made it optional with a town to comply with, or to forego the advantages and avoid the burdens of the act, was soon seen to need modification ; and, in the second year of its operation, it was, upon the suggestion of the superintendent, made obligatory. The adminis- tration of the new svstem was confided to Gideon Haw- The admin. • i istration ley, as superintendent of common schools, who proved of Gideon to be admirably adapted to his work. He had a genius HaTFley for organization, was broad-minded and of quick sym- pathies, patient in matters of detail and of shining in- tegrity of character. He was to New York, what Horace Mann was to Massachusetts and Henry Barnard was to Connecticut, both an inspirer and a guide. He was. as he has often been called, the father of the com- mon school system in the state. Born in Huntington, Connecticut, September 26, 1785, he became, when nine L!0 Department of Public Instruction years old, a resident of Saratoga county. He was gradu- ated from Union college in 1809, studied law and was practicing in Albany, when on the 14th of January, 1813, he was elected superintendent. He retained office until February 22, 1821, meanwhile having been ap- pointed secretary of the regents, March 25, 1814, and continuing as such until 1841. In 1842 he was made a regent and served in that capacity until his death in Albany, July 17, 1870, in the eighty-fifth year of his age. Xo man has had a longer association, a more intimate acquaintance with, nor a deeper and more salutary in- fluence upon, our educational affairs than he. His name deserves to be held in lasting remembrance. Xo state- ment of the achievements of his administration could be more perspicuous than that which he modestly ascribes to the inherent quality of the system itself, in his sixth annual report, in 1819, where he says: '"The same data also afford evidence that common schools have risen in public estimation, and received a degree of care and at- tention to their concerns, corresponding with their in- crease and prosperity. If these results were the only evidence of a beneficial operation in the system of com- mon schools provided by law, they would be sufficient to establish the public confidence in the policy of thai system, and to secure it a permanent duration. But it is well known, although it does not appear from any data in the returns, that the system has produced other results noit less in magnitude or merit. It has secured our schools against the admission of unqualified teachers, by requiring them to submit to examination before a public board of inspectors, and to obtain from them a certificate of approbation, before they can legally be employed. It has imparted to common schools a new and more respectable character by making them a subject of legal notice, and investing them with powers to regulate their own concerns. It has corrected many evils in the discipline and government of schools, not only by excluding unqualified teachers, but by sub- jecting the schools and course of studies in them to the frequent inspection of public officers. It has founded schools in places where, by conflicting interests or warn of concert in the inhabitants, none had been before es- tablished; and, it has. by its pecuniary aid, enabled many indigent children to receive the benefits of educa- tion which would not otherwise have been within their reach." In 1821, when Superintendent Hawley retired. A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 21 there were 6,323 organized school districts, from 5,489 of which reports had been made, showing that 317,633 children had been under instruction during that year, that the public bounty was sufficient to defray the ex- penses of the schools, for about three months in each year and that in most of the districts poor children were enabled to attend school free of charge. It is in- teresting to note that the unification of the educational systems of the state was practically, if not nominally, accomplished under Mr. Hawley, from the fact that he was for seven years both superintendent of common schools and secretary of the board of regents. In 1805, an educational work was begun in the city sSfoor^si- of New York and continued until 1853, to which, jg^Vork although it did not come within the specific direction city of the educational department of the state, reference is here pertinent, because of the standing of the men enlisted in it, the zeal with which it was prosecuted, the good it wrought, and, more than all, the earnest and even bitter controversy it inspired and the princi- ple which the issue of that controversy confirmed. On the 19th of February, 1805, twelve prominent citizens of New York, impressed with the conviction that no opportunity was afforded for the education of children, outside the charitable and denominational schools, met at the house of John Murray in Pearl street and ap- pointed a committee to devise a plan of relief. The report of the committee, sustained by hundreds of signatures to a petition to the legislature, resulted in a law of the same year entitled "An act to incorporate the society instituted in the city of New York for the establishment of a free school for the education of poor children who do not belong 1<>. or are not pro- vided for, by any religious society.'' Its income was restricted to |10,000 and the annual membership fee was fixed at eight dollars, but members contributing $25 were privileged to send one and those contribut- ing $ 40 two children to any school under its care. The number of trustees was thirteen, increased from time to time until it reached LOO. In all 434 persons served in this capacity. l>e\Yi11 Clinton was the first presi- dent continuing as such until his death in 1828. In 1808, the name was changed i<> I he Free School Society of New York, and its scope enlarged " to all children who are the proper subjects of a gratuitous education.'' In 1826, the corporation was styled " The 22 Department of Public Instruction Public School Society of New York " and the trustees were authorized to provide for the education of all children in the city of New York not otherwise pro- vided for "whether such children be or be not the proper objects of gratuitous education, and without regard to the religious sect or denomination to which such children or their parents may belong ; " and to require from those attending the schools a moderate compensa- tion ; but no child to be refused admission on account of inability to pay. The pay system was, however, abolished in 1832. At the outset subscriptions were obtained and on the 19th day of May, 1806, the first school was opened. In 1807 an appropriation of $1,000 was made by the legislature toward erecting a house and $1,000 were directed to be paid annually for defray- ing the expenses of the school. The city also gave a building and $500 for repairing it, on condition that the society should teach fifty almshouse children. State and municipal aid thus began ; grant succeeded grant; and the schools became public to all intents and purposes, although under the control of a private cor- poration. In 1813 the legislature ordained that that portion of the school moneys apportioned to and raised in the city of New York should be distributed " to the trustees of the Free School Society, the Orphan Asylum Society, the African Free School and the trustees of such incorporated religious societies in said city as now support, or hereafter shall establish, charity schools within the said city, who may apply for the same." The distribution was to be limited strictly to the payment of teachers' wages. In 1824 the common council was authorized to designate the societies and schools which should receive the school moneys, and thereafter nearly nine-tenths of the amount thereof was dispensed to and expended by the Public School Society which, at the time, had six schools, with an attendance of over 5,000 pupils. The de- In the initial appeal of that society for means with the «ie- which to prosecute its work, it was stated that it would «onai a " be " a primary object, without observing the peculiar ■chooia forms of any religious society, to inculcate the divine truths of religion and morality contained in the Holy Scriptures," and the reading of the King James version of the Bible and lessons thence drawn were prescribed In the curriculum. By many, this was construed as rendering the schools denominational and the demand, A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 28 as a claim in equity, for a portion of the school moneys was pressed by pronounced sectarian schools and the objection was also urged that it was undemocratic and inimical to the spirit of our free institutions that a private corporation should have the management of schools sustained almost wholly by appropriations from the public treasury. The agitation thus engendered waxed fast and furious for many years, extending beyond the metropolis through the state, eliciting in behalf of the distribution of school moneys among the sects the voice of Archbishop Hughes and the pen of McMaster of the Freeman's Journal and the mes- sages of Governor Seward, and against it the speeches of Theodore Sedgwick, Hiram Ketchum, Gardiner Spring and other distinguished protagonists of the Public Society in its favor, while John C. Spencer, secre- tary of state, wrote a notable weighty and luminous report against the policy of an educational system in the hands of a private corporation, rather than in those of the people, describing it as foreign to the feelings, habits and usages of our citizens, and proposing the organization of a board, by the popular suffrage, that should have charge of all school interests, the public moneys to be paid to and by it disbursed. The result was the passage of a law on the 9th of Yoru" *Tty April, 1842, entitled "An act to extend to the city and {^u«itto H county of New York the provisions of the general act in relation to common schools." It provided for the election of commissioners, inspectors and trustees by wards, the resolution of the commissioners into the board of education, the raising by general tax of funds for the maintenance of the schools, the placing of the Public School Society and several charitable educa- tional institutions under the jurisdiction of the board, they to be classed, in the distribution of school moneys, as district schools of the city, and it was ordained that no school in which any sectarian doctrine or tenet was taught or practiced should receive any part of the school moneys. Eleven years later the Public School Society surrendered to the Board of Education all its property, real and personal, valued at $454,421.85, in- cluding seventy-eight schools, and with the introduc- tion into that board of fifteen commissioners of its selection, its efficient, and, in many respects, commend- able and honorable service of forty-eight years ended. 24 Department of Public Instruction The secre- when Gideon Hawley was retired, he had laid sfate °be- broadly and deeply the foundations of a symmetrical perintend- educational structure; had secured ju . n • common ments to the educational statutes ; b schools stantially shaped the codification of 1819, which u no essential changes in the machinery of the school.-. and had accompanied its publication with an exposi- tion of its provisions and forms for proceedings under it; had seen the proportion of children attending school increase from 4-5 to 24-25 of those of school age; the average time the schools were kept open lengthen in about the same ratio, and the principal of the common school fund appreci- ate from $822,064.74 to $1,185,641.98. Welcome E was appointed successor to Mr. Hawley. but his term w T as brief. Within less than throe months, the super- intendency, as a separate department of the govern- ment was abolished and its duties were relegated to the secretary of state, who was elected for a term of three years by joint ballot of the senate and assembly. John tration^of VanXess Yates was the first incumbent. Coincident Ness' Ya a t"s with the new order, was the article in the constitution to the effect that all lands thereafter sold should con- stitute a perpetual fund, the interest of which should be inviolably appropriated and applied to the sn of the common schools throu state — a solemn pledge in the organic low which, renewed in 1846 and 1894, has been observed faithfully. In 1S22, the secre- tary was invested with appellate jurisdiction over all controversies arising under the school laws and his decision thereon made final, a power which since uni- formly inhering in the head of the school department has been of signal advantage to its coherence, efficiency and authority and has relieved the courts of litiga- tion much of which would have been annoying and burdensome. On the 12th of January, 1825, Mr. Yates transmitted his last annual report to the legislature, from which it appears that 402,940 children had been taught, for an average period of nine months, during the preceding year, the number of districts was 7,<>42 from 6,936 of which reports had been received, and the aggregate amount of teachers' wages in the reporting districts was $182,741.61. A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION - Azariah C. Flagg was appointed secretary of state f r * 1 t n i *," ,s „"f February 14, 1826, and served until February 1, 1833. Azariah c The annual message of Governor DeWitt Clinton, in 1826, was remarkable for its intelligent discussion of educational subjects and its liberal recommendations in behalf of the common schools, and especially in that it proposed a seminary for the preparation of teachers and state visitation of the schools, which was reiterated in 1827 and 1828, both of which, subsequently embraced in our educational system, have been among its most effective agencies for good. The message of the gover- nor elicited from the literature committee of the senate a report, of which John C. Spencer was the author, that urged the adoption of the scheme of county supervision, inspection and licensing of teachers, but concluded that, for the time being, owing to economical considerations, the colleges and academies must suffice as nurseries of teachers, advising, however, that the income of the literature fund should be divided among these, by the regents, in proportion to the number of scholars pursu- ing English, as well as that of those engaged in classi- cal studies; and the committee was unable to discover why, upon principles of justice and public policy, insti- tutions for females should not participate equally with those for males in the public bounty. In 1S27, Mr. Spencer made a second report of similar tenor to the first, and framed a bill, which became a law, entitled "An act to provide permanent funds for the annual ap- ool and rature ture fund, and to promote the education of teachers," "^Ji* which, after transferring certain state moneys to the common school and literature funds respectively, di- rected that the income of the latter should be dis- tributed among the incorporated academies and semi- naries, other than colleges, subject to the visitation of the regents, in proportion to the number of pupils in- structed in each academy or seminary for six months during the preceding year, who shall have pursued either classical studies, or the higher branches of Eng- lish education, or both. Secretary Flagg advocated consistently the founding The i>e S -i»- of distinct institutions for the instruction of teachers, normal In his report of 1830, he alludes approvingly to a aclxoal memorial presented to the legislature at its preceding session, from a committee of the citizens of Rochester, asking for the establishment of a state seminary for •JG Department of Public Instruction teachers and a central school in each town. The de- mand for such a seminary had already become pro- nounced in several northern states. So early as 1789, it had been intimated in an essay in the Massachusetts Magazine. Professor Denison Olmstead, of Yale col- lege, in an address at New Haven, in 1816, had advo- cated it eloquently. Professor Kingsley, of Yale college, favored it in an article in the Xorth American Review in 1828. James G. Carter, who is called the " father of the normal schools" in the United States, described its principal features in a series of papers in the Boston Patriot in 1825; it was emphasized by the Rev. Thomas H. Gallaudet in 1825, and, in the same year, Walter R. Johnson, of Germantown, Pa., issued a pamphlet, philo- sophical in its affirmance of the proposition, that at- tracted wide assent from educators, while, in 1833, President Junkin, of Lafayette, and President Golton, of Bristol college, pressed it upon the Pennsylvania legislature. In 183G Professor Calvin E. Stowe, at the request of the legislature of Ohio, visited the Prussian normal schools and, in his report to that body, advised it to incorporate similar schools — a report which was republished by order of the legislatures of Massachu- setts, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Virginia, and North Carolina respectively. Honor to whom honor is due. If Massachusetts, impelled by the enthusiasm of Horace Mann, did erect, in 1839, the first normal school in the country, neither the thought of DeWitt Clinton, in 1826, ) nor the plea of Azariah C. Flagg, in 1830, should be for- gotten. When Secretary Flagg left his office, in 1833, to become comptroller, the number of districts was 9,600 and of children taught therein 491,459, being an in- crease of 195S and 91,519 respectively over those last re- ported by Secretary Yates. The amount of public money expended for payment of teachers' wages had risen* to $305,572.78 of which $100,000 came from the common school fund. A.iminis- John A. Dix, who filled many state and national posi- joni"^.. tions, including those of United States senator, secre- tary of the treasury, minister to France, governor and major-general during the civil war, with eminent credit and usefulness, was appointed secretary of state Febru- ary 1, 1833, and served until February 4, 1839. As such, not less than in his other public capacities, he displayed his civic worth. He was loyal to the cause of education and, under him, school affairs were prudently and Dix A REVTEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 27 wisely ordered, salutary reforms were accomplished and decided progress was made. In 1835, the foundations of the district school library were laid by an act au- thorizing the taxable inhabitants of the several school districts to levy a tax, not exceeding twenty dollars for the first year and ten dollars for each succeeding year, "for the purchase of a district library, consisting of such books as they shall in their district meeting direct." The first step taken by New York for the profes j£SS sional education of teachers was the Act of May 2, ™% n J; ci j£. 1834. This act provided for a "normal department" in emie. one academy, in each of the eight judicial districts, ap- propriating to each $500 for the purchase of apparatus, maps, charts and globes, and $400 annually for teachers. Each of these schools was to have a local "board of visi- tors" who were to report the results of their inspection to the secretary of state. Secretary Dix was not in accord with the effort in behalf of seminaries exclusively for teachers and, on the 5th of January. 183G, as chairman of the committee of the regents to prepare a. plan for the better education of teachers, held that the organization of a teachers' department in one academy in each of the eight sena- torial districts would supply the existing need, and that each such academy should receive annually from the literature fund $400 to that end. His report was adopted and the academies were designated by the re- gents. On the 0th of May of the same year, Prosper M. ft • r "*"" 1 " Wetmore, chairman of the literature committee of unification the assembly, and then and for many years there- after a regent of the university, made to the assembly an exhaustive report in favor of the establishment of a separate "Department of Public Instruction" in charge of an officer to be known as "Secretary of Public Instruction," who should possess all the func- tions of the Superintendent of Common Schools and also be ex officio Chancellor of the University, with the colleges and academies, as well as common schools, sub- ject to his visitation. Nothing practical came of this program of unification, but it may not be, even at this day, unworthy of consideration. In his annual message for 1837, Governor Marey recommended the transfer of the general superintendence and supervision of the academies frorn the regents to the secretary of state, as 28 Department of I'jjijuc Instruction superintendent. No legislative action was had upon this proposition, but it is in evidence as the revelation that one of the ablest statesmen and executives that New York has produced believed that the conduct of secondary education inheres properly in the superin- tendent of public instruction rather than in the regents. The governor in his message, a year later, maintained that the designated academies were inadequate to sup- ply the needed teachers and suggested the institution of county normal schools. In 1838, the sum of $100,000 was added, from the revenue of the United States de- posit fund, to that of the common school fund, making a total of f275,000 of which $55,000 was set apart for the purchase of books annually for district libraries and the remainder for teachers' wages. An equal amount was also to be levied upon the people for the same purpose. In his last annual report, in 1839, the secretary stated that there were 10,583 organized school districts and 528.913 children were taught therein — an increase of 983 and 31.051 respectively during his tenure. The amount paid for teachers' wages had reached $335,882.92. Atiminis- Another of the great men of New York, John C. jo^mVc. Spencer, who served the commonwealth in both spencer branches of the legislature and the nation in the house of representatives and in two seats in the cabinet, suc- ceeded John A. Dix as secretary, in 1839, and remained until October 12, 1811, when, upon his becoming secre- tary of war, the duties of superintendent devolved upon the General Deputy, Samuel S. Randall, who discharged them until February 7, 1S12. Mr. Spencer was a man of acute intellect and disciplined faculties, exact in thought and vigorous in expression, tenacious of his views, and his administration was marked not less by the discussion of policies than by real reforms effected. As already indicated, he was deeply interested in the determination of the management of and appropria- tions for schools in New York city and was strenuously opposed to the introduction of normal schools, but as strenuously urged the increase of the number of acade- mies in which teachers should be instructed. county an- i n 1S40 the "board of visitors" at Mount Morris, in ents their report, recommended a "state seminary devoted exclusively to the training of teachers." By an ordi- nance of the regents, of the 4th of May, 1811, apportion- ments were made to two academies in each senatorial A i;i:yii:\y of its administration 20 district, and, in addition, seven oilier academies were given $700 each from the literature fund for that pur- pose. On the 26th of May, the legislature passed an act, drafted by Mr. Spencer, providing for the appointment, biennially, by each board of supervisors, of a superin- tendent charged, as the title implies, with general cure of the schools within his county and the hearing of ap- peals. This office, the propriety of which was in issue from first to last, existed less than seven years, being abolished on the 13th of November, 1847. It had its ardent champions, as it still has, being sanctioned in several states, and its severe critics who constantly labored for its overthrow. By its friends, it was re- garded as a necessary link between the town and dis- trict officials and the state bureau, as relieving the latter of much of petty details and trivial disputes, and as promoting the unity of the school system and an esprit de corps among its servants. Its foes objected to the method of appointment, by boards of supervisors not conversant with school mailers and more or less actu- ated in their choice by political motives and expedien- cies, and they also exaggerated the pecuniary burden imposed upon the localities which were constrained to pay one-half of the salary of the county superintendent. Continual assaults finally prevailed against it, notwith- standing the adherence to it of the state department and a large majority of prominent educators. Upon the whole, it worked well, especially as an intermediary be- tween the town commissioners and the secretary, and, save in rare cases, it did not lack faithful and enlight- ened administration. On the 5th of January, 1842, Vcting Superintendent Randall transmitted to the legis- lature his annual report, from which it appears that, exclusive of the city of New York, 603,583 children Avere taught in 10,886 districts reporting, an increase of 303 and 74,670 respectively since the retirement of Secre- tary Dix. The amount received from the state by the schools, including the revenue from the United States deposit fund was $65S,954.70. Samuel Young became secretary of state and head Adminis- of the common school system, February 7, 1842. Dm- sVnmJi ° ing a long political career, he held many offices of dig Youns nity and trust — judge of Saratoga county, delegate to the constitutional convention of 1821, assemblyman three years and speaker one, canal commissioner, regent of the university from 1817 until 1825, and state sen- SO Dotaktmbnt of Public Instruction ator for twelve years. He was also an unsuccessful candidate for governor, by a narrow margin of votes, against DeWitt Clinton in 1S24. He was not, when chosen secretary, regarded as especially well versed in common srhool matters, but he brought to their con- sideration habits of close investigation, eminent clarity and rectitude of judgment, and an earnest resolution to guard and advance their interests. No reports of any superintendent are characterized by a more lucid perception of educational needs, a more catholic recep- tion of new ideas, in several instances reversing his pre- conceived notions, a more intimate acquaintance with the details of management, or a more candid and forc- ible style of presenting his conclusions ; and the normal school and teachers' institute are greatly indebted to him — the one for its establishment and the other for the encouragement given to its inception. The persuasive impetus to the being of the normal school in this state seems to have emanated from a convention of county superintendents at Utica, in 1842, before which the Rev. Alonzo Potter, D.D., then professor of mathematics in Union college and later the Protestant Episcopal bishop of Pennsylvania, Horace Mann and others advocated the project and the convention, by resolu- tion, approved it cordially. At a like convention, the ensuing year, similar indorsement was made. Secre- tary Young, in his report in 1843, declared that the teachers' departments in the academies were not ful- filling their design " because the bounty of the state was diffused over too wide a surface, and recommended their reduction to four and the appropriation of a sum sufficient to establish and maintain a normal school at the state capital." The Hui- In 1844, decisive action was had. The Honorable port Jn" Calvin T. Hulburd, chairman of the assembly coin- ■eiloou mittee on colleges, academies and common schools, who had visited the several normal schools of Massachusetts and had familiarized himself with their methods and had also collected statistics concerning the operation of such schools in Prussia and other European countries, made, on the 22d of March, an exhaustive report upon the subject, which remains a monument of patient labor, valuable information and sagacious direction. Few educational papers have excelled it, either in the knowledge it imparts, or the worth of its counsel. It is still frequently referred to. The following passage A BBVIBW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION il will bear quoting, especially as emphasizing the pre- scient spirit that informs it throughout : " It will be noticed that the committee speak of the establishment of one normal school : Did our present means seem to warrant it, the committee would, with confidence, recommend the immediate establishment of at least one in each of the eight senatorial districts. If one is now established, and that is properly endowed and organ- ized, there cannot be a doubt that not only one will be called for in each of the eight senatorial districts, but in a brief period very many of the large counties will insist upon having one established within their limits. The establishment of one is but an experi- ment — if that can be called an experiment, which for more than a century has been in operation, without a known failure, which, if successful, will lead the way for several others. * * * The committee believe the experiment should be tried at the capital; if it can- not be tested in the presence of all the people, it should be before all the representatives of the people. As a government measure, it is untried in this state; the result, therefore, will be of deep interest. Here at each annual session of the legislature, can be seen for what and how the public money is expended ; here can be seen the exhibition of the pupils of the seminary and the model school; here, if unsuccessful, no report of interested officials can cover up its failures, or prevent the abandonment of the experiment ; here citizens from all parts of the state, who resort to the capital during the session of the legislature, the terms of the courts, etc., can have an opportunity of examining the work- ings of the normal school system; of learning the best method of teaching, and all the improvements in the science and practice of the art; those ^vho, in the spring and autumn, pass through the city, and to and from the great metropolis, and those who from all parts of the union make their annual pilgrimage to the fountain of health, will pause here to see what the Empire state is doing to promote the education of her people." With the report, Mr. Hulburd introduced a bill which. The Albany earnestly supported by Michael Hoffman and other sy the schools of the cities materially modified since its original passage, the most radical changes being the relief from tuition fees of resident pupils in academical departments and the mak- ing of tuition of nonresident pupils a state charge in 1903, Among other recommedations embraced in Superin- tendents Rice's first report were these: That district school meetings should be held at a certain fixed and uniform time; that there should , be a reduction of local school officers; and, especially in line with the views of his predecessors, that county superintendents should be replaced in the school system, quoting, in this connection, among those of several prominent educa- tors, the words of Henry Barnard, in 1S45, who said : "I have watched the progressive improvement in the organization and the administration of the school sys- tem of this (New York) great state, with intense in- terest, and I regard it at this time as superior to any other of which I have any knowledge. But the most admirable feature in your school system is the pro- vision for county superintendents. There is nothing to be compared to this in the school system of any other state. There is nothing in all the wise legislation of your state in regard to public instruction unless, per- haps, the liberal appropriation for district libraries, wdiich the friends of public education elsewhere are so anxious to see adopted into the school system of their respective states." As indicative of the standing the schools of the cities had attained, the following extracts from Superintend- ent Rice's second annual report, is taken : " The cities have been especially favored by legislation. Their schools are as free to every child as the air he breathes. It is their mission to give a practical education alike to the rich and the poor; and they are fulfilling it in a manner creditable to their particular localities and to the state. Thousands of parents have been induced to remove from the rural districts for the purpose of edu- cating their children in these schools. With one or two exceptions, they are under a complete and thorough supervision, which points out the most approved modes of school architecture, secures competent teachers, and incorporates into their plans of instruction every im- provement of the day. How long the children of the cities shall enjoy privileges so much superior to those in other parts of the state remains for the legislature A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 49 to determine. I have visited with their superin- tendents some of the principal schools of New York and Brooklyn, and have seen great multitudes of children and youth congregated therein fitting themselves for independence and extensive usefulness; some of whom, were it not for the liberal provision for schools, would be educated in the streets. Tax payers have long since learned that they cannot afford to encourage the edu- cation there acquired. Buffalo, Oswego, Rochester, Syracuse, Auburn, Utica and other cities, are attracting the wealth and intelligence of less favored portions of the state in consequence of their excellent schools." What may be called the beginning of compulsory educa- tion in the state had been made by the law of 1853, by which the municipalities were required to provide industrial schools for children roaming the streets, but its enforcement was attempted only in Rochester. The last year of Superintendent Rice's first adminis- school tration was signalized by the passage of two salutary sioneVs" acts. The one, already alluded to, essential to the creMte « l orderly supervision of the schools, was that by which the office of commissioner was ordained, — the outcome of an arduous battle against prejudice and parsimony. The other was that levying a state tax of three-quarters ti.o ti«-ee- of a mill upon the dollar in lieu of the imposition of S'miu *»"* the gross sum of $S00,000— a bridge which the schools traversed to the goal of freedom — resulting in 1857 in the receipt of $1,073,768.97, a gain of $273,768.97, while there was a diminution in rate bills from $161,779.13 in 1856 to $127,956.07. From the report of 1856, it is learned that the principal of the common school fund was $2,491,916.14. The total expenditures of the schools for the preceding year were $3,544,587.62. For teachers' wages $1,051,210.47 came from the state tax; the amount from local taxes for city, village and union free schools, where rate bills were dispensed with, was $730,674.2S; the cost of schoolhouse sites was $57,- 839.15; of building schoolhouses, fences, etc., $381,- 101.88; of hiring schoolhouses $17,568.69; of repairs to houses, fences and out-buildings $169,555.98; of book- cases and furniture $50,781.97; and of libraries $50,- 801.50. Among the recommendations of Superintend- ent Rice were the establishment of more normal schools; a more liberal appropriation for teachers' institutes; the naming of a uniform day for the holding of the annual district meetings and the conforming of the 4 tendent Van Dyclc 50 Dbpartment of I'unuc Instruction • school year, to which (he additional returns of the dis- trict relate, to the fiscal year of the state, the last two recommendations being incorporated in chapter 151 of the laws of 1858 by which it was enjoined that the school year should begin on the first day of October and end on the thirtieth day of September, and the annual school meeting in each district should be held on the second Tuesday of October. Admits- Henry H. Van Dyck, who became superintendent snperin- ' April 7, 1857, was a man of exact methods, and among the first things he accomplished was a reform in the bookkeeping of the Department. Having found that the amount raised for school purposes, in 1855, was apparently $221,537.64 in excess of that of 1856, and having also noted other discrepancies in the records, he concluded that the blank office forms were so con- structed as to make it probable that some items of expenditure were embraced under different headings, so as to be doubled or trebled. Thus he made a change in the blanks that led to a directness of statement that precluded unintelligible duplications or careless omis- sions; and, so far as he could, he compelled accuracy in the reports of subordinate officers, in which, as he says, he was assisted materially by the new scheme of local supervision — the commissioners. It is well to state here that, in the preparation of this review, difficulty has been experienced in the examination of figures, from the reports of town superintendents, often mani- festly inaccurate and insufficient, and, sometimes, even baffling. The attempt has been made throughout to adjust and reconcile these, with, it is hoped, some measure of success, and with results substantially cor- rect, but, whatever errors have occurred, they are not likely to be repeated in further details, and this largely owing to the forms introduced by Superintendent Van Djck. Otherwise, his administration was not marked by radical departures either in methods or policies. He was not disposed to suggest alterations in the laws beyond certain simple amendments obviously neces- sary to the public convenience, preferring rather to realize the good possible under existing statutes than to experiment with new ones. He contended that the school system was not so much wanting in the facilities for imparting instruction as in the indisposition of a considerable portion of the population to utilize those already available. He did not believe that compulsory A ItEVlEW or ITS ADMINISTRATION f» 1 education could be enforced, but be t bought 1be desired end could be promoted by a discrimination in the appli- cation of state funds founded on the proportional num- ber in actual attendance, upon the theory that such a provision would give to each taxpayer a direct pecuniary interest in securing the largest possible at- tendance upon the schools, both as a means of securing a larger share of the state bounty and as reducing local taxation. The distribution of funds, which the super- intendent thus inferentially criticised, was that of two- thirds of the public money to a district, according to the number of persons between the years of four and twenty-one. In his report for 1859 (the last of his La«t re- first term) Superintendent Van Dyck presents the fob van Dyou-. lowing financial summary : *"* term Receipts Cities Rural districts Balance on hand October 1, 1858 ^332,314 01 $90,607 53 Amount received from moneys apportioned by state "superintendent... 378,416 45 944,266 88 Proceeds of gospel and school lands 177 96 19,206 68 Amount raised by district taxes 1,402,282 56 619,180 49 Amount raised by rate bills 414,062 72 Amount received from all other sources 9,618 59 46,609 21 Totals $2,122,810 57 $2,033,933 51 Total in cities 2,122,810 57 Total in state $4,156,744 08 Payments. For teachers' wages $961,395 14 $1,481,989 66 Libraries 9,583 58 28,778 00 School apparatus 111,118 40 6,846 39 Colored schools 20,766 42 3,597 58 Expenses of schoolhouses, viz. : sites, buildings, hir- ing, purchasing, repair- ing and insuring, fences, outhouses, furniture, etc 440,961 75 283,330 72 52 Department of Public Instruction Receipts Cities Rural districts All other incidental ex- penses $164,422 27 $152,027 66 Amount on hand October 1, 1859 414,563 01 77,563 50 Totals $2,122,810 57 $2,033,933 51 Total in cities 2,122,810 57 Total in state $4,156,744 08 Subtracting the amount on hand October 1, 1859, the actual payments for school purposes during the twelve months preceding were $3,644,617.57 — a liberality of ex- penditure, as the superintendent observes, that indi- cates unmistakably the deep interest felt by our citizens in the cause of education. \iii the odious rate bill shall no longer prevent children from going to school; that the schools shall be as free to all of proper age and condition as the air and sun- light. ( Inferentially in all the Rice reports and speci- fically in 1865, '66 and* '67.) This too came to pass and that during the official life of its author. By the A REVIEW OF ITS ADM INISTKATION 59 same law, taking effect October 1, 1867, that increased state taxation for the schools, they became free in fact, as well as in name, throughout the state, as they had been, for years, in the cities. The rate bill was abol- ished. This was a glorious consummation. The blot upon the 'scutcheon was effaced. The principle that the property of the state should educate the children of the state was vindicated. The doors of the common school were opened wide; all could enter upon equal terms; there would be no further exemptions as the stigma of the indigent and no further burdens to make up deficiencies for the well-to-do to bear. The schools were democratized. The free school was, above all else, the affirmation of a principle of republican government, a basal principal of a commonwealth, long apprehended by statesmanship and expressed by the municipalities, yet long waiting for full legal recognition. As such, the statute of 1867 is to be commemorated in educa- tional annals, and, credit is to be accorded to those who were instrumental in securing it, and conspicu- ously to Victor M. Rice who, as the head of the common school system, was its consistent champion and tireless promoter. But, aside from the principle, the law immediately proved its utility. Within four months from the time it became operative, Superintendent Rice was able to say that it was meeting the most sanguine hopes of its advocates ; "Already " he adds " the local school officers report an average daily attendance of pupils at the schools twenty to thirty- five per cent greater than it was during the same period of the year previous. In many districts, and particularly w r here there is a large proportion of foreign born population, it has been found necessary to in- crease the accommodations, from this cause." He also refers to the continued beneficial effects of the union free school act of 1853 in contributing to the establish- ment and maintenance of a superior class of graded schools, claiming that in range and quality of in- struction they compare favorably with the best acad- emies which, in many localities, they are supplanting. About eighty of some 300 chartered academies had at this time been absorbed in the union free schools. The following table — a comparison of the condition of these schools at the time they were made free with that at the time report* therefrom were collected by the super- (50 Department of Public Instruction intendent — shows something of the progress they bad made: Average increase of the time of main- taining schools per year 9.4 per cent Aggregate increase of the number of teachers employed 2S weeks or longer per year 88 " Aggregate increase of the amount paid for teachers' wages per year 141 " " Aggregate increase of compensation to each teacher per year 28 " " Aggregate increase of the number of children of school age 32 " " Aggregate increase of the daily attend- ance of pupils at school 74 " " Aggregate increase of values of school- houses and sites 178 " " Prior to their organization as union free school dis- tricts, there was an absence of comfortable housings, qualified teachers were hard to obtain because it was hard to pay them, the schools were not graded aud rate bills repelled the children of the poor and parsimo- nious; but, as organized, the children crowded the schools and, the interest of the inhabitants being- quickened, ampler provision for schoolhouses and com- petent teachers was made. Inasmuch as the new free school law had but just gone into effect, full statistics are here omitted and comparisons will be made further cost ot on. Let it suffice to state that at the close of the last lios£ot* school year of Superintendent Rice's third term, the Sinistra, schools were costing $7,683,201.22 as against $4,549,- tion 870.76 at the close of that of his second term — an increase of $3,133,330.56. a n minis- On the 7th of April, 1868, Abram B. Weaver, a V'uranrB* graduate of Hamilton college, who had been a school weaver commissioner in Oneida county and a member of assembly, became superintendent of public instruction. He brought to the place experience in the schools and was especially intelligent in devising measures for their improvement. His reports were able and luminous and his capacity for administration was manifest throughout. It was his privilege to be the first execu- tive of the free school law, for Superintendent Rice was but permitted to start the machinery, which his A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION Gl successors operated. Mr. Weaver's first annual report (1869) revealed the satisfaction he felt in his work and his reflections thereon fitly supplement the antici- pations of his predecessors. He says : " The cause of public instruction, during the last fiscal year, has operation * of tlio t"re 600 00 269 75 611 70 1,130 20 1869 1,678 75 These schools were amply justifying their being, although, owing to contracts with localities for academic and other departments they were not and are not yet as strictly professional as their name im- plies. The following are statistical and financial tables for 1873 : Statistical Rural Cities districts Total Number of districts 66S 11.327 11,995 Number of teachers employed at the same time for 28 weeks or more 4,940 13.355 IS, 295 Number of male teachers employed 592 6,505 7.097 Number of.female teachers employed 5.166 17,201 22,367 Number of children in attendance 416.063 614.716 1,030,779 Average daily attendance..: 203,697 295,772 499,469 B6 Department of Public Instruction Financial Rural Receipts Cities districts Total Amount on hand October 1, 1872. $878,905 96 $255,651 37 $1,134,557 33 Apportionment of public moneys 1,028,714 35 1,665,627 56 2,694,341 91 Proceeds of gospel and school lands 36 44 35,626 17 35,662 61 Raised by tax 4,600,019 05 3,043,345 47 7,643,364 52 Estimated value of teachers' board 225,93168 225,93168 From all other sources 105,103 71 249,80122 354,904 93 $6,612,779 51 $5,475,9S3 47 $12,088,762 98 Rural Payments Cities districts Total For teachers' wages $3,693,641 64 $3,721,539 75 $7,415,181 39 For libraries 11,985 65 15,218 14 27,203 79 For school apparatus 234.SS9 92 59,255 76 294,145 68 For colored schools 66,54S 03 8,063 46 74,61149 For schoolhouses, sites, etc 1,050,926 50 943,206 39 1,994,132 89 For incidental expenses 663,714 59 476.S6S 13 1,140, 5S0 72 Forfeited, in hands of super- visors 15125 15125 Amount on hand October 1, 1S73. 891,073 IS 251,682 59 1,142,755 77 Totals $6,612,779 51 $5,475,983 47 $12,088,762 98 Deducting from the totals, under the head of pay- ments, the sums remaining on hand October 1, 1873, it appears that the actual expense of maintaining the common schools during the year was $10,946,007.21. Comparing some of these figures with those of the year (1867) preceding Superintendent Weavers accession to office, and the operation of the free school act, the fol- lowing increases will be noted: Number of districts 223; number of teachers employed 2,975; children in attendance 81,756 ; average daily attendance 79.512 and in the actual expenses of the schools of $3,262,S05.99. The average time each pupil in the cities attended school was 19 weeks and in the rural districts 16 2-10 weeks. The average length of school terms in the cities was 41 weeks, and, in the state, 35 weeks. Super- intendent Weaver's administration was eminently sound and practical. He thoroughly believed in the democratic principle upon which the common schools are based and his courage was displayed in his care for their concerns, in his proposal that the head of the department of education should be the head of all the educational affairs of the state, in his resolute opposition to the appropriation of any moneys raised by taxation to institutions belonging either to private corporations or religious denominations, and in his con- sistent fealty to the cause of elementary education. In this, there was with him " neither variation nor shadow of turning." A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION <>1 On the 7th of April, 1874, Neil Gilmour, who was a £*&£J'if graduate of Union college, and had been a teacher and superin- o ■ o ? tendent school commissioner in Saratoga county, became super- Giimonr intendent.of public instruction. He was reelected in 1877 and again in 1S80. In his first annual report (1S75) he refers to the statistics of the year as exhibit- ing a steady growth in the existing system, which amply vindicates the wisdom of the legislation of 1867. He notes that the number of school districts in the towns bad decreased from 11,327, in 1873, to 11,299, in 1874, caused chiefly by the con- solidation of small districts, and the formation of union graded schools in the more populous towns and villages. Slight decreases are noted in succeeding years, due to the same causes and to the settled policy of the Department to encourage the organization of such schools. The superintendent calls attention, as had his immediate predecessor, to the continuous decay of the district libraries, and is satisfied that their use- fulness is ended. He distinctly favors the establish- ment of town, in lieu of district, libraries. He renews the same suggestion in 1870, in which year, he also alludes to an issue, that has vexed the Department more or less, for many years — the actual or attempted evasion of the law and the constitution by denomina- tional schools obtaining public moneys. With the con- nivance of local authorities, against plain legal pro- hibitions. This issue may again be referred to, but Superintendent Gilmour's words may here be quoted as declaratory of his resolute attitude thereon : " There are reports" he writes "that propositions have already been made, and in some cases accepted, that certain parochial schools, not under the control of the state, should be used by the trustees or boards of edu- cation of the districts in which they are located, on condition that the teachers be appointed by those having the control of such schools, or that the course of instruction be subject to their approval. The adoption of such a policy would be a step towards the destruction of our system .of public instruction. I earnestly recommend that the legislature take such steps as will securely imbed in the constitution of the state our common schools; as will place them beyond the power of any man or set of men, party or sect, to interfere with their admirable working, or in any man- 68 Department op Public Instruction ner impair their usefulness or tend to their destruc- tion." According to the report for the school year end- ing September 30, 187G, the last year of Superintendent Gilmour's first term, the schools had cost $11,439.- 038.78; the number of school districts in the towns was 11,285; the number of schoolhouses in the cities was 430 and the rural districts 11.824; the male teachers were 7,687 and the female, 22,522; the aggregate attend- ance was 1,067,199 and the average daily attendance was 541,610. Aaitation During Superintendent Gilmour's second term, pub- the normal he attention was called to the work oi the normal lct°f teachers. The history of professional examina- examina- tions in this state is an interesting one, already referred lions CT to incidentally, but which now calls for a somewhat ex- tended review. From the first, the state insisted that teachers should possess proper qualifications for their calling. The act of 1795 specified, among the other duties of town commissioners, that they slum Id deter- mine the qualifications of teachers. It also provided that the inhabitants residing within different parts of any town might form associations for the purpose of maintaining schools and might appoint two or more persons to act in their behalf as trustees, who should employ teachers and consult with the commissioners concerning their qualifications, and the associations were debarred from the apportionment of public moneys, unless the trustees employed teachers who met the approval of the commissioners. This method ob- A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 77 tained until 1812. The act of that year, which fixed the number of commissioners of a town at three, pro- vided, also, as has been stated, for three inspectors who, with the commissioners, were made a board to examine and license teachers. This plan was continued until 1841, when the number of inspectors for a town was fixed at two, who were still associated with the com- missioners as an examining and licensing board. Power was also given to deputy superintendents in the same respect. In 1813, when the offices of town com- missioners and inspectors were abolished, their func- tions were vested in town superintendents, and the name of deputy was changed to that of county superin- tendent, each with territorial jurisdiction defined by his title. The acts also conferred upon the superin- tendent of common schools, on the recommendation of county superintendents, or such other evidence as might be satisfactory to him, the power to issue cer- tificates entitling their holders to teach in any public school within the state. After the abolition of the office of county superintendent in 1847, there remained but two authorities to issue teachers certificates — the state superintendent and the town superintendents, those of the latter having validity only within their own towns. In 185G, the office of town superintendent being vacated, school commissioners succeeded, with authority to examine teachers and issue certificates for their respective districts, with the Superintendent of Public Instruction empowered to prescribe the rules under which such certificates might be issued. State superintendents never, however, exercised this power until 1888, when Superintendent Draper promulgated the uniform system of examination for the guidance of commissioners. For many years there had been a demand for a change in the method of certification of teachers. Certificates in many cases were issued to unqualified persons, because of political pressure and sometimes because of corrupt appliances. The wisdom of placing this important work under the immediate direction of the State Superintendent and establishing a uniform basis for examining and licensing the teachers of the entire state had been a subject for dis- cussion at many of the state educational associations and was generally conceded. Superintendent Draper at once understood that the absence of a definite 78 Department of Public Instruction scheme to determine the qualifications of teachers was one of the weakest things in the school system, and he sought to remedy it with all the energy and resources at his command. The opinion prevailed that legisla- tion was necessary to centralize this work under the superintendent and he prepared a bill to this end, which passed the legislature, in 1887, but was vetoed by Governor Hill, upon the ground, as the Governor claimed, that it discriminated in favor of New York and Brooklyn, which were excepted from its operation. The failure to obtain legislation did not discourage the superintendent. He was resolved to raise the teaching- force to a higher standard and he thought it could be done in no more effectual way than by instituting a definite uniform method for the examination of teachers. Seventy-five per cent, of the commissioners in their reports had favored such a scheme under the direction of the superintendent. It was suggested that commissioners might request the superintendent to provide uniform rules and prepare questions to be used by them in their examinations. Every educational association in the state and every educational journal therein gave this movement their cordial support. By September 1, 1887, sixty commis- sioners had expressed their willingness to adopt rules formulated by the superintendent and to use examina- tion papers provided by him. The first examinaiion was held in September, 1887, and monthly examina- tions were held during the remainder of the year. By July 1. 1888, every commissioner in the state had volun- examina- tarily adopted the uniform system. Superintendent eompiisiied Draper held that, under certain provisions of the school laws, he already possessed the power to ordain a uni- form system of examinations and to compel the com- missioners to adopt it. In this view, he was sustained by Attorney-General Charles F. Tabor. He, therefore, issued an order that, in the future, all commissioners should comply with the requirements of the uniform system. Whatever doubt may have existed as to the authority of the superintendent was removed in 1801, when the revised ronsolidated school law was enacted which, by subdivision 5, title 5, section 13, of that act directs that the school commissioners shall ; " ex- amine, under such rules and regulations as have been or may be prescribed by the Superintendent of Public A REVIEW OP ITS ADMINISTRATION 79 Instruction, persons proposing to teach common schools within his district * * * an d ? jf he finds them qualified, to grant them certificates of qualification in the forms which are or may be prescribed by the super- intendent." The Department now prepares all papers Examina- used in examinations and forwards them to commis- generally sioners. The papers submitted by candidates were marked by commissioners until June, 1894. The legis- lature of that year made provision for the appointment of a board of examiners in the State Department. This board was organized in June, 1894, and since then all examination papers have not only been prepared by the Department, but the answer papers submitted by candidates have also been marked in that Depart- ment by a permanent board of examiners. This places the certification of teachers upon an absolutely honest and uniform basis and renders it impossible for a per- son to obtain a certificate who does not possess the requisite scholarship. The same evils and abuses that existed in commissioner districts before the uniform system was adopted prevailed to some extent in the cities of the state. While the State Superintendent had the authority to prescribe the regulations under which teachers should be examined in commissioner districts, he did not possess authority to prescribe such rules for the cities. The charter of each, or special educational acts therefor, determine in what manner the teachers of such cities shall be examined and licensed. In some of the cities, the uniform system of examinations governs by statute. In most, however, teachers are examined and licensed under such regu- lations as the local school board, or superintendent pre- scribes, and the authorities of nearly all the cities have adopted the uniform system, Albany, Buffalo, James- town and New York being the exceptions. Under the uniform system of examinations thus adopted three classes of teachers' certificates were issued, as follows : A third grade certificate valid for six months, renew- able only upon examination and to be issued to the same person but twice. A second grade certificate valid for two years and renewable only upon examina- tion. A first grade certificate valid for five years and renewable in the discretion of a commissioner without examination. This system with various modifications and amendments is still in force. Temporary permits 80 Department of Public Instruction Reforms instituted by Super- intendent Draper Supervi- sion of training' classes vested in superin- tendent are issued, to bridge over an emergency, and continue only long enough to carry the candidate to the next examination. Uniform and grade examinations are now held at appropriate times and places, in the dis- tricts, and for life state certificates, in August, in various cities. There are also examinations for kinder- garten teachers. A certificate is issued by the superin- tendent, without examination, to any graduate of a college or university, who has had three years experi- ence as a teacher in the public schools of the state sub- sequent to graduation; and the holder of a normal school diploma is thereby accredited as a teacher. Superintendent Draper was famous, as he still is, for his capacity for organization. He did things. In addition to his signal reform in the conduct of exam- inations — the crowning glory of his administration — many other of his achievements might be recorded. To a few, attention must certainly be drawn ; and, first of these, is the transfer of the control of teachers' classes from the regents to the department of public instruction. Shortly after Superintendent Draper assumed office, he found that there were, under the management of the regents, 195 teachers' classes in 142 academies and union schools, with 2,676 students, for whom tuition was allowed from the state appro- priation for that purpose to the amount of $33,091. Educators were generally apprehending the incongruity of the control of these classes by the regents — an agency really foreign to the common schools — super- vising the preparation of their teachers, and the thought was dominant in their minds that all the instrumentalities tor such preparation, the normal schools, the uniform examinations, the teachers' insti- tutes and the teachers' classes should be related to each other, each accommodating itself to and supple- menting the work of the other. It was seen that three of these were so related, while the fourth was acting separately and independently. At the annual holiliav conference of the associated academic principals, in 1888, at Syracuse, this sentiment took shape not, as is to be suspected, without the inspiration of the super- intendent, in a resolution adopted unanimously to the effect that, as the licensing of teachers was in the hands of the superintendent and as it was desir- able that the teachers' classes should be part of a symmetrical system for the education of teachers, the A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 81 management of such classes should be trans- ferred to the department of public instruction. This resolution, accompanied by a coherent and convinc- ing statement of the situation, was presented by Super- intendent Draper to the board of regents and met with the prompt and cordial acquiescence of that body; and by chapter 137 of the laws of 1889, the supervision of the teachers' classes passed from the regents to the department, with the best results, as the concurrent evidence of principals, commissioners and educators generally, abundantly attests. Still other features of Superintendent Draper's administration, some of statu- tory and others of his individual sanction, were these: The changing of district school meetings from the last to the first Tuesday in August and the closing of the school year on the 25th of July instead of the 20th of August; the changing of county to district institutes, in the hope that they would be less mass meetings and more schools of instruction (although as now graded the institutes are frequently joint ones of two or more districts) ; the publication of a new code of public instruction; contracts with teachers to be in writing and monthly payment of their wages made mandatory; competitive examinations for the free scholarships from assembly districts in Cornell uni- versity; the extention of the minimum time, in which schools were to be kept open, from 20 to 32 weeks; the obtaining of designs and specifications for the build- ing of schoolhouses to cost from $600 to $10,000 and their wide dissemination; the health and decency act; the increase of general state appropriations for free schools by $1,000,000; admission to normal schools, the courses of study and the condition of graduation reg- ulated with a view to making them more completely training schools for teachers; the chartering of three new normal schools — New Paltz, Oneonta and Platts- ^ast an- burg; and the designation of the Friday following the port of first day of May in each year as Arbor day. Very tend"."" properly could the superintendent say, in surrendering Draper his trust : " Careful students of American systems of education must admit that New York holds deservedly a most prominent position among her sister states as regards provisions for popular instruction. Although she has never received her full share of credit for the part she played in the past, which entitled her to a 82 Department of Public Instruction most conspicuous position in the history of popular education in this country, yet she is now attracting universal attention by the tremendous efforts of the present. We are now realizing that the first and most important duty of the sin te is to provide a good ele- mentary education for the masses, on whose intelli- gence and patriotism the safety of the commonwealth depends, and to see that every child receives such an education. It only remains to agree on the details of the measures and then the feeling would be ripe and the circumstances opportune for decisive legislation, which would soon enable New York, with her boundless wealth and her great liberality, to distance all com- petitors, and to make her elementary schools the best in the world." The following are statistical and finan- cial tables for the year ending July 25, 1891 : Statistical Number of districts Number of teachers emplovei.1 at the same time for legal term of school 9,126 Number of male teachers employed 970 Number of female teachers employed 9,512 Number of children in attendance 513,066 Average daily attendance 344,609 Number of times visited by commissioners Number volumes in district, libraries 244,333 Number schoolhouses, log Number schoolhouses, frame 56 Number school houses, brick 533 Number schoolhouses, stone 6 Total number schoolhouses 595 Financial Receipts Cities Amount on hand at beginning of school year $2,393,739 99 Apportionment of public moneys 1,649,900 74 Proceeds of gospel and school lands 1,062 94 Raised by tax 8,460,756 44 Estimated value of teachers' bti.'inl From all other sources 636,972 41 Rural districts 11,196 15,231 17! Ill 540,978 305,408 13-.939 584,820 45 10,070 1,040 322 11,477 Rural districts $704,112 75 2,115,355 76 29.3S3 31 3,692,593 47 46,794 24 538,446 24 Total 11,196 24,357 5,359 ui;.i;-:; 1,054,044 650.017 13.939 829,153 45 10,126 1,573 328 12,072 $3,097,852 74 3,765,256 50 30.446 25 12, 153, 349 91 46,794 24 1,175,418 65 Total $13,142,432 52 $7,126,685 77 $20,269,118 29 Payments For teachers' wages For libraries For school apparatus For schoolhouses. siles. etC For incidental expenses Forfeited, with supervisors Amount on hand at end of yeai Total Cities 56,564,365 94 24.620 41 340,236 L0 2,707,165 70 1,213,205 64 2,292,838 73 Rural districts $4,443,620 49 27,588 94 53,926 85 998,798 11 795,440 18 916 63 SOI, 444 27 Total ,012,986 43 52,159 35 394,162 95 ,705,964 11 ,008,645 82 916 63 ,094.283 00 $13,142.132 52 $7,126,6S5 77 $20,269,118 29 Deducting from this total, the amount on hand at the end of the school year, the actual expense of main- A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 83 taining the schools, for the year ending July 25, 1891, was $17,174,835.29 or $3,708,-407.32 more than they cost for the year immediately preceding Superintendent Draper's accession. Meanwhile, the aggregate value of schoolhouses and sites increased from $35,662,084 to -150,013,491, the average daily attendance from 625,813 to 650,017, the average length of school term in the towns from 33.3 to 35.3 weeks, the number of teachers employed for the legal term, from 22,240 to 24,357 ; the amount paid for teachers' wages from $9,102,268.77 to $11,012,986.43; their average annual earnings from $409.27 to $452.16, and their average weekly wages from $11.46 to 12.18. James F. Crooker, who had been a teacher and ^"^J^f superintendent of the schools of Buffalo, became superin- superintendent of public instruction, April 7, 1892, crooker and served one term. The prevailing tone of his first annual report (1893) is that of satisfaction with the condition of the schools. There is, he discovers, a spirit of improvement manifest in the character and capacity of the buildings, the rude structures in the rural districts having given place to modern and comfortable ones. The primitive log housings had substantially disappeared, only 41 of that kind remaining. " Within the last two decades," he says, " vast advance strides have been made in school architecture and schoolhouses are now constructed upon sound scientific principles and with a view of obeying the laws of health." He accompanies his statement with specimen drawings of both the ex- terior and interior of a number of the recently erected houses, creditable in appearance and convenient in appointments, in the likeness of which there are, to day, thousands in the state — in the towns, as well as in the cities and villages, our school architecture certainly not being excelled by that of any other state. Upon this development, in which every citizen of New York may take just pride, the later superintendents have bestowed great pains. The superintendent is gratified in that the number of normal school graduates em- ployed for the past exceeds that of the preceding year by 426 and concludes that the normal courses, the training classes and the uniform examinations are, in concert, doing much to elevate the standards of the public schools and to render them more and more 84 Department of Public Instruction Superin- tendent Crooker's views on elemen- tary and secondary education efficient; the salaries of teachers have appreciated but he still thinks that they are disgracefully meager in the country schools. In common with nearly all his predecessors he advocates the adoption of the town- ship, and the doing away with the district, system, but his recommendation to that end was unheeded by the legislature, as has been that of his successor, although sustained by the leading educators of the state and by the unvarying experience of other states in its favor, which means of course town trustees, with the com- missioners intermediary between them and the state superintendent. Superintendent Crooker had certain positive ideas concerning the obligation of the state to stimulate and support elementary, as compared with and even prefer- ential to, higher and secondary, education, and he did not hesitate to express them. In die report, now under consideration, he somewhat bluntly, thus phrases his thought: "Too much attention is given to higher edu- cation at the expense of a thorough, practical ground- ing in a knowledge of the subjects with which the great masses have to deal in ordinary business trans- actions. * * * If the state deems it wise that greater expenditure for school purposes should be made, instead of appropriating increased sums for academic education, examinations in law and medicine, univer- sity extension, and all such schemes which are of doubtful propriety for the state to meddle with, it were a thousand fold better to appropriate money for the establishment of kindergarten schools in the large cities. Better appropriate $50,000 for such schools in the cities than $1,000 for university extension, so called." The superintendent repeats the same views in his second annual report (1894) and enlarges upon them in his third (1895). From this the following passages are quoted : " The common schools are the special wards of the Department of Public Instruction, and every dollar of state school moneys withheld from them by being diverted to other and more fortunate schools, means inexcusable injustice and tends to weaken and injure them materially. In my previous annual reports. I have alluded to the injustice and deleterious effects of the clashing dual-headed system which exists in the management of public education. A large amount of the public A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 85 school moneys, which rightly belongs to the common school funds for general apportionment, is with- drawn yearly and devoted to a purpose entirely at variance with the spirit of free public education. This diversion is wrong in principle, wrong in application, and vicious in its tendencies and results. This double- headed educational management is the most peculiar feature in this state or in any other. No other depart- ment in the state has two heads for the management of its affiairs. It is an anomaly! One branch dis- tributes a portion of the school funds in its own way, according to its own peculiar and independent rules, while the other apportions another part in accordance with the statutory laws governing it. * * * The state appropriation yearly, for the support of the regents, is over $1S5,500. This I consider an useless expense so far as the interest of a great majority of the public schools is concerned, although it may be of financial benefit to these few; I must, therefore, earnestly protest once more against the dual system and plan of taking away any portion of the state moneys from the common school fund for the purpose of sustaining two educational departments and prac- ticing favoritism toward one branch of the school sys- tem at the expense of another. It is radically and inexcusably wrong. * * * The recently amended constitution, in an article, provides against the pay- ment of any public school moneys toward the main- tenance of any private schools or parochial institutions, and now the legislature ought to provide, by an enact- ment of law, against the use of any money by the regents, if only to prohibit the paying of premiums to schools on examinations, and it would thereby save to the state a large amount of money that could be used for general educational purposes." These views of Superintendent Crooker are reproduced, not specially with the purpose of endorsing them, but as due to him as an affirmation of his fidelity to the common school system and his sensitiveness to what he con- sidered encroachments upon its democratic adminis- tration, as well as his contribution to the vexed ques- tion of the unification of the educational departments of the state, the discussion of which, in late years, has engaged so much of the attention of educators and statesmen, with so many and so diverse proposi- tions for departure and adjustment. 86 Department of Public Instruction Changes in the ex- amination depart- ment Consoli- dated school act of 1894 Superin- tendent CrooUer's last :• ■ i — annual report Important changes were made in the examination department during 1894. In accordance with the recommendation of the superintendent, the legislature made an appropriation enabling him to appoint a board of examiners to pass upon the answer papers submitted by candidates for commissioners' certificates to teach in the state. Such board was duly constituted and has since done admirable work. Under it, a certificate of any grade issued in any county is of the same value as a certificate of a corresponding grade issued in any other count};, and the commissioners are relieved of a large amount of clerical work previously devolv- ing upon them. The legislature of 1894 passed the " consolidated school act," the same taking effect June 30. This was the first revision, or consolidation, since 18G4. No radical changes were made by it, but, under it, the school year begins August 1 and ends July 31; schools must be taught, at least 100 days in- clusive of legal holidays and exclusive of Saturdays; all school district officers must be elected by ballot; all propositions for the expenditure of money, or authoriz- ing the levy of a tax, must be determined by ballot, or by the ayes and noes of qualified voters ; and where a tax is voted to be raised for the building of a school- house, or an addition thereto, said tax to be raised by installments, the payment, or collection, of the last installment cannot be extended beyond twenty years. The following are statistical and financial tables for the year ending July 31, 1894 : Statistical Rural Cities districts Total Number of districts 11,121 11,121 Number of teachers employed at I lie same time for 1G0 days or more in. 264 15.632 25.vn; Number of male teachers employed 1,022 4.074 5.036 Number of female teachers empioyed 10.729 17,104 27,833 Number of children in attendance r,s:i.::t;:: :,?,:.. G35 1,124,998 Average daily attendance 407,955 313. 10S 721,f su- exhibit that the amount expended upon the schools eniTsictn- " had reached vast proportions, illustrative of the great- "/^ fil " st ness and liberality of the commonwealth. The total cost of the schools for the year ending July 31, 1897, was |2G,689,85C, an increase in one year of $3,516,026 and in 12 years of $13,401,870. The cities spent $19,152,014, an increase in one year of $3,610,573, and in 12 years of $11,274,047, the towns spent $7,537,212, a decrease in one year of $94,547, but an increase in 12 years of $2,130,823. The cost had thus increased more than 100 per cent in 12 years. During this period, the number of teachers employed for the legal term increased 2S^ per cent; the amount of teachers' salaries 55^ per cent ; the number of children of school age had decreased nearly four per cent, due entirely to the change in school age; the average daily attend- ance had increased 31 per cent, and the amount ex- pended for schoolhouses, sites, furniture and repairs had increased 270 per cent. The invested common school fund was $4,473,140.77. During the year 1897, a judicial decision was ren The school dered, so important in its bearings, as to make a some-Mta^ai what extended reference to it proper. It was the affir- ln " 41tutlon mation of the power of the state to compel a municipal- ity, or school district, to provide and maintain adequate educational facilities, or, otherwise put, that the school is a state and not a local institution. The issue arose 94 Department of Public Instruction in the city of Watervliet, where a bi-partisan board of education of four members, owing to a deadlock, neglected and refused to appoint teachers, janitors and other officers, at the opening of the school year, Sep tember 7, and the children were forced to seek instruc- tion elsewhere, or roam the streets. An appeal Mas made to the state superintendent by two members of the board to effect the removal of the two other mem- bers. This petition the superintendent did not feel at liberty to grant, but he ordered the board to open the schools on or before the 4th day of October and that the necessary teachers, etc., should be appointed. The day passed, without compliance with the order, and the superintendent, concluding that, under the mandate of the constitution and the provisions of the consolidated school law, he was clothed with the requisite authority, directed an employee of the department to proceed to Watervliet and there act temporarily as superintendent of schools, at the same time appointing a full corps of teachers, attendance officers, janitors and a librarian. The schcols were thus opened October 5, about 1,400 pupils being present. Two residents of the city made application to the Supreme Court for an injunction restricting the state superintendent from interfering with their local school system. The case was heard before Justice Alden Chester, at a special term at Albany, in November, the Honorable Danforth E. Ainsworth, deputy superintendent of public instruc- tion appearing for the department, and the Honorable Edwin Countryman for the applicants. Justice Ches- ter denied the application in an elaborate opinion, up- holding the action of the superintendent in all particu- lars, upon the ground that he had jurisdiction in the matter, which he rightfully exercised for the benefit of the schools, that " the mandate of the constitution can- not be nullified at the will of an} r local board, failing to discharge the duties imposed upon it by law, but that the power exists to compel obedience to this re- quirement, and this power is lodged in the state super- intendent of public instruction." No appeal was taken from Justice Chester's ruling, and it stands as law and precedent, not probably to be again questioned. Con- nected with school affairs in Watervliet was a decision L , i, e oo e i cnlar of the superintendent, dated .May 15, 1897, to the effect that the wearing of an unusual garb, used exclusively A REVIEW OP ITS ADMINISTRATION 9E by members of one religious sect, as indicating affilia- tion with that sect, -by the teachers in a public school, constitutes a sectarian influence, which cannot be tolerated and must be prohibited. Superintendent, Draper had made a like decision, ten years previously, and it had not been modified or disapproved by bis successors. It has the force and effect of a statute, and is based upon the secular character of the schools which must be maintained alike against technical evasion and open assault. In his annual report (1899) the superintendent says that compulsory education in this state is no longer a mere pretence, but an accomplished fact. The neces- compnt- sity and propriety of compelling the attendance of cation, children upon the schools had long engaged the atten- tion of the department and had by degrees been resolved into law. The first act was that of 1853, which provided that any vagrant child, in any city or incor- porated village, between the ages of five and 14 years, upon complaint of any citizen on oath, should be brought before a magistrate for examination, and the parent, guardian or master of such child should be notified to attend such examination, and if the com- plaint should be established, the magistrate was to require from such parent, guardian or master a contract in writing with the corporate authorities that such child should be sent to some school at least four mouths in each year, until he or she should become 11 years old. The law also imposed pecuniary penalties for nonfulfillment of the contract, directed the commitment of a vagrant child, who had no parent, guardian or master, to an institu- tion for instruction, and authorized the corporate authorities to provide suitable places for the reception of such. New York was thus the first state, except Massachusetts, to enact a compulsory education law. It was, however, enforced spasmodically and irration- ally, if, it may be said, that it was enforced at all. Public sentiment was adverse or had not been educated up to it. The statistics of school attendance, from 18GG to 1873, show that from 55 to 60 per cent of the children over six and under 17 years old, were out of school every day— a grievous condition, perilous to the state. 96 Department of Public Instruction In 1874, the second compulsory act was ordained and became operative, January 1, 1875. Although an im- provement upon the statute of 1853, it was defectively and carelessly drawn, and inadequate in its sanctions. It required all children, between 8 and 11 years of age, of sufficient physical and mental strength, to attend school at "least fourteen weeks in each year, eight of which should be consecutive. Local school authorities were empowered to enforce attendance and to furnish suitable places for the instruction, dis- cipline and confinement of truant children. It was a species of local option and depended entirely upon pub- lic sentiment for its validity. Amended in 1S76, it still failed of its object. In his annual report (1888) Superintendent Draper said: "There is a large uneducated class in this state, and our statistics show that it is growing larger. * * * To be sure, we have a compulsory education law upon our statute books, but it is a compulsory education law that does not compel. It has never been acted under to any con- siderable extent, and this being so after fourteen years of trial, it is fair to presume that it never will be. In my opinion, there are good reasons why it has never accomplished what was desired of it. In the first place, it requires members of boards of education to look after and apprehend delinquent children, and it is un- reasonable to expect that officials elected only to manage the schools, and who serve without pay, will devote the necessary time, or that they will engage in work which should devolve upon a policeman or con- stable, or some other officer specially charged with and paid for such service. Again, the penalties provided for in the act run mainly against children, and no peo- ple will be swift to enforce penalties against children for delinquency, not amounting to crime, for which they are not properly so answerable as are their parents or guardians. The penalties in the act which go against parents are mere fines, so inconsiderable as to be ridiculous, and the machinery for collecting them is too cumbersome and expensive to be commonly made use of. Moreover, the act requires that children under 11 years of age should attend for at least fourteen weeks in the year. Attendance for so small a part of the year is hardly of enough importance to justify any serious effort to insure it. Again, the law does not re- A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 97 quire communities to act in the matter, nor does it pro- vide any adequate school facilities for the accommoda- tion of delinquents if brought in. There are other diffi- culties in the way of the enforcement of the compulsory education act, but it is unnecessary to occupy space in referring to them. Indeed, the fact that the act has remained a dead letter so long is. of itself, sufficient reason for looking for some more practical way for enforcing attendance upon the schools." Superintendent Draper requested Sherman Williams, then Superintendent of Schools at Glens Falls, to in- vestigate the subject of compulsory education. Dr. Williams, in conformity with this request, did so and in an able report, of date December 2, 1887, concluded that New York should at once take comprehensive, de- cisive and mandatory action upon the matter, but it was not until 1S94 that the present law was enacted. It has since received some modifications and, as thus modified, is incorporated in the consolidated school law of 1902. It is greatly to the credit of Dr. Williams that his recommendations are substantially embraced in the law, the main provisions of which are as follows: All children between S and 12 years of age. in physical and mental well being, must attend public school for the full yearly period; all children between 12 and 14 years, at least SO days, and the entire time, if not regularly and lawfully engaged in some useful employment; and all between II and 1G years, for the full school period, unless in employment as aforesaid; parents must cause their children to attend school unless they can prove their inability to compel such attendance, violation of this requirement being made a misdemeanor punishable by fine or imprisonment; it isalso made a misdemeanor, with like alternative penalties attached, for any person, firm or corporation to employ any child when, with the foregoing definitions, it is imperative that he or she shall be in school; the local school authorities shall appoint, and may remove at pleasure, one or more attendance officers, fixing their ( ompensation as a local charge, who may arrest truant children and a magis- trate may commit habitual and incorrigible ones to a truant school, to be provided by the school authorities, or such may be remanded to private schools, orphans' homes, or similar institutions, controlled by persons of the same religious faith as that of those in parental 7 9S Department of Public Instruction relation to such children, to be there held until such time as it may be practicable to assign them to the schools they should lawfully attend ; the state superin- tendent may withhold one-half of all public moneys from any city or district which, in his judgment, will- fully omits and refuses to enforce the provisions of the law ; and he is authorized to employ such assistants as mem^anfl ne ma J deem necessary to administer the law. As the reports un- [ aw f igt)± f 00 ^ effect nearly coincidentlv with the der the * ' compel- accession of the present superintendent, it became his cation law duty to start its machinery and watch its workings. of 1894 He at ouce a pp i n ted Arthur M. Wright as chief in- spector, with A. Edson Hall and William J. Barr as assistants. Messrs Hall and Barr are still in the service, with John J. N. Byrnes as an additional assist- ant. James D. Sullivan is chief inspector. Beneficent results immediately occurred. From the first annual report of Mr. Wright the following figures are taken : Statistics of Towns 1893-1S94 1894-1895 Number of children between 5 ami 21 residing; in the districts 723.440 694.917 Average number of days of school 175 173 Number of children registered as attending school ~ 535,635 5H.730 Average daily attendance 313,109 328,580 Whole number of days attendance at school 55.S60.721 57,xi:\:ui Per cent, of registration to number res ding in the districts 74.04 77.95 Per cent, of average daily af tendance to num- ber registered 58.45 60.65 Statistics of ('Hies 1893-1894 1894-1895 Number of children between 5 and 21 residing in the cities 1.20S.SS5 1,251.328 Average number of days of school 196 1S7 Number of children registered as attending school ' 5S9.333 616,613 Average daily attendance 407,995 429.114 Whole number of da.\s aiiei 79.669.04S 81,982,010 Per cent, of registration to number residing in the district 48.75 49.28 Per cent, of daily attendance to number regis- tered C9.22 69.59 In 1902 Mr Sullivan was enabled to say : " The tables show for rural districts 13,491 less children, as compared with 1901, and a decline in registration of 10,707, while the same tables show a gain in aggregate ( attendance of 517,903 and an increase in average daily attendance of 2,255 ; and we also have a gain in average daily attendance for the entire state of 35,241 giving us the highest average daily attendance ever reached in A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 99 the history of our schools. Other figures are equally interesting as indicating how the compulsory law is working out its marvelous results with less friction annually ; 26,237 truants were arrested, as against 29,171 for the year 1901— a decrease of 2,934. These figures might indicate a questionable relaxation in the enforcement of the law, were it not for the fact that we have an increase in average daily attendance of 35,211 for the same period as shown above. The num- ber of parents prosecuted during the year, as compared with 1901, also presents an interesting computation. In 1901, 921 parents were prosecuted for violation of the statute, Avhile but 679 were prosecuted during the past year — a decrease of 245. Do not these figures clearly indicate that parents and those in parental re- lation are coming more and more to understand the re- quirements of the law and cheerfully complying with its mandates?" And the superintendent could say also: " For the year 1S91 the per cent of enrollment to school population was only 64, while for the school year ending July 31, 1902, the per cent of enrollment to school population was nearly 91 — a net gain of 27 per cent; and, while in making the computation, some note is to be taken of the reduction of the maximum school age from 21 to 18, yet the marvelous result of 27 per cent increase is largely to be credited to a judicious enforcement of the law. Every year has marked the steady ingathering from the streets into our schools of thousands of neglected children, as well as many more who were being illegally employed." The superintendent sugg< sts the urgent need of at least two state truant schools, or truant homes, and also that the present laws should he so amended as to provide that, after careful investigation by an attendance offi- cer, a requisition from the board of education or trustee for books and clothing to enable poor children to attend school should be promptly honored by local poor authorities, and the same be made a legal charge against the town. The superintendent has noted, during his term, with Adornment satisfaction, the growing public interest taken, not only g^und^ 1 in the improvement in school structures throughout the state, but also in the efforts made and taste displayed in beautifying their surroundings. Something of this is to be attributed to the exercises of Arbor day and the 100 Department op Public Instruction trend thus imparted and something to the consecration of generous-hearted citizens, in that behalf. Special acknowledgment, as the superintendent observes in his annual report (1903), is due to Professor John W. Spencer, head of the bureau of nature study in Cornell university, for his incitement to teachers and pupils to adorn school grounds with trees and shrubbery and flowers. In 1902, Prof. Spencer received reports from 500 school districts which, through his encouragement, had made their grounds attractive. For several years, by the liberality of the Hon. William A. Wadsworth, of Geneseo, the superintendent has been able to offer cash prizes — $ 100 for the best kept school grounds and $50 for the second. These prizes have been duly awarded and photographs of the grounds thus selected have appeared with the annual reports of the Depart- ment. In 1902 also, the Youth's Companion, of Boston, gave United States flags to the 20 school districts and, in the current year, six sets of historical engrav- ings to the 500, manifesting the most interest and enter- prise in adorning their grounds. These agencies, and such as these, are tokens of a movement which will go on until all our school grounds shall " blossom as the rose." romeii * n * lie barter of Cornell university, it was stipu- unfversity hired that in return for the permission to that institu- state " tion to receive the land scrip granted to the state, by shii?s ar " the act of Congress, July 2, 1865, it should " annually receive students from each assembly district, free of any tuition fee." The university was disposed to con- strue the intention of the legislature to be that each district was entitled to but one student, at the same time, but the state authorities insisted that one should be admitted each year. The university yielded the point, and 512 free scholarships were thus provided, upon competitive examination, under the regulation of the superintendent. Until 1887, however, not one-half of these scholarships were filled. In that year a law was passed awarding scholarships left vacant in any district to candidates in other districts. Thereafter the number was kept full, and. if any student left before graduation, the superintendent filled the vacancy from eligible names in the list of contemporaneous can- didates. By the Constitution of 1894, the number of assembly districts was enlarged from 128 to 150; but, therein A REVIEW OF ,"S ADMINISTRATION 101 at the first, the superintendent ordered the Cornell ap- pointments upon the original basis, believing that the university had equities in the ease which deserved con- sideration. He recommended to the legislature that the free assembly district scholarships should be increased to GOO and that the state should establish at Cornell a state pedagogical department, or school of pedagogy, for the professional training of college graduates, and others of equivalent standing, in the theory and prac- tice of education, thus training them for positions as teachers in high schools, academies and normal schools, or as superintendents of schools. The state took no action, but the superintendent, in 1900, felt constrained to grant 150 scholarships, and the university again yielded, reserving, however, its equities in the premises and claiming that the cost of the tuition of 600 students would be $175,000 a year, while the income of the pro- ceeds ($688,570.12) was but $31,428.80. This is the existing status. The superintendent still believes that in justice to Cornell and for the welfare of education, the state should support a school of pedagogy there. It may be added that there is a department of pedagogy in Cornell, consisting of a professor and a lecturer, both of whom are paid by the university. In 1903, the superintendent discusses at some length The^Bibie the question of reading the Bible in the public schools, public He is loath to adhere to the ruling of his predecessors in relation thereto. He alludes to the decision of Superintendent Weaver, supplemented by nearly every superintendent since, that " no teacher has a right to consume any portion of the regular school hours in con- ducting religious exercises, especially when objection is raised;" but says that the Weaver decision, in the specific case, was against religious exercises, according to the usage and practice of a religious sect and that " there is a vast distinction between exercises of that character and the reading of the Bible without note or comment." He finds that a recent decision of the supreme court of Nebraska, often referred to as pro- hibitory of Bible reading in the schools, is precisely in line with that of Superintendent Weaver, and that such reading is either authorized or permitted in nearly every state of the union, California alone constitution- ally prohibiting it, and the attorney-general of Wash- ington having written an opinion adverse to it. The 102 Department of Public Instruction reading is not generally practiced in Louisiana, Nevada, Idaho, Oregon or Utah. The school law of New York is silent concerning it, but by special statutes the board of education of the city of New York is forbidden to exclude the reading of the Scriptures, without note or comment, in its schools. He says distinctly that "local authorities are empowered by the school law to estab- lish courses of study to be followed by the schools under their charge. I think this may fairly be construed to include the opening exercises of such schools, subject, of course, to the right of appeal to this Department from an abuse of this power by local authorities. Whenever the practice thus established shall violate the provisions of the Constitution, and the opening exercises or course of study, as prescribed by them, shall include the teaching of any sectarian tenet or doctrine, I should feel impelled, in case of appeal, to prohibit such exercises. But where the Scriptures are read, as the statute provides they shall be in the city of New York, without note or comment, by a public school teacher in a public school of this state, in the presence of Hie pupils thereof, as part of the opening exercises, I shall deem it my duty to rule that such practice is not in violation of Hie Constitution or statutes of this state." He refers approvingly to a volume of " Read- ings from the Bible selected for schools," consisting of selections from the Old and New Testaments, prepared by a committee of four, of whom a member of the Roman Catholic communion was one, and to whivh a Jewish rabbi gave valuable assistance, and suggests that this work might be used in the schools, wherever the reading of the Bible is a cause of contention. "•Sca'uL During nearly the whole period of the service of the present superintendent various plans for the unifica- tion of the two great departments of education have been proposed, and have been prolific of much serious and some acrimonious discussion in educational circles, official and popular assemblies and the press. The late constitutional convention expended much time upon the subject, in the hearing before the committee on edu- cation of proponents of many and diverse schemes, and to debate upon the floor, but was unable to formulate a declaratory article thereon, limiting itself to con- ferring constitutional entity upon the regents, re- affirming the mandate to the legislature to maintain A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 103 free schools and the inviolability of the school funds and prohibiting state aid to denominational schools. In the agitation of the last decade, the superintendent has been involved necessarily, restricting himself, how- ever, to the vindication of two principles, which he re- gards as cardinal and fundamental, viz.: that, wiih or without unification, the statutory functions of the Department must be preserved intact and public sec- ondary education must be remanded wholly to its super- vision and control. He would draw tin 1 line of demarcation clearly and determinedly between tax- supported and non tax-supported schools. This would be at once a democratic and intelligent definition of the province of each department and an allaying of friction between the two arising, and that only, from the dual jurisdiction of tax-supported secondary educa- tion that has heretofore obtained. Regarding the ad- ministration of his department ;;s a sacred trust, he can do no less than uphold it in its integrity, and ho seeks to do no more. His attitude is that of defense and not of aggression. Thus he says, in 1899 : " The legislation of 1853 permitting the organization of academic depart- ments in certain public schools is primarily responsible for this anomalous condition of our school system. * * * The public school, maintained by public taxation, no matter where it is situated, ought to be under the supervision and control of a single depart- ment of the state government. To maintain two departments to perform the work, which could better be done by one, with greater economy to the stale and more efficiency, is so plainly unwise and against all principles of government, that it is surprising, not only that the state ever entered upon the system in 1853, but that it has continued it so long, and that too, when there is plainly a. natural line of demarcation between the work to be done by these two departments." Since 1898, a number of bills of various tenor, pro- viding either for demarcation or for unification, have been introduced in the legislature, one proposed by the state statutory revision and one emanating from a com- mission appointed by Governor Roosevelt. To both these, the superintendent accorded his assent, inasmuch as they recognized the line of demarcation upon which he has, from the first, insisted. Bills under the auspices of the regents, and others under those of the 104 Department of Public Instruction superintendent, have also been before the legislature, but none has reached a vote in either house. Dur- ing the year 1903 the superintendent, upon con- sultation with and the approval of leading educators, including college presidents, normal school principals and city superintendents, matured a plan embodying the following features : the creation of a state board of education consisting, at the beginning, of nine members of the board of regents, to be selected by lot, with respective terms of from one to nine years, also deter- mined by lot, with future members to be chosen by the legislature, each for nine years, with each judicial dis- trict of the state finally to be represented; such board to elect a commissioner of education, to serve during its pleasure, choice not to be limited to any present citizen of the state, who shall be its executive officer, having general supervision of primary, secondary and higher education, with power to create such depart- ments as, in his judgment, shall be necessary, and to appoint deputies, subject to the approval of the board; neither the State Superintendent, any member of the present board of regents, nor any person holding an appointment under either to he eligible as I he first commissioner; the first commissioner (the board appointing his successors, as indicated) to be either named in the bill or elected by I he legislature; and the board of education, which shall also be the board of regeuts, reserving to itself the right to adopt regula- tions, confer degrees, guard the entrance to the legal, medical and all oilier professions, (he granting of char- ters to higher educational institutions, with such other powers as it now possesses, nut specially vested in the commissioner. The main features of this plan were incorporated in a bill introduced in the assembly by Mr. L. L. Davis and referred to the committee on pub- lic education. Meanwhile the legislature of 1903 had appointed a joint committee to investigate the subject of educational unification and report to the legislature of 1904. Of this committee Senator Merton E. Lewis was chairman. That committee made an elaborate re- port which was transmitted to the legislature Febru- ary 3, 1904, and a bill, subsequently amended in certain details, was introduced in both houses of the legisla- ture and is now a law. Its principal provisions are. as follows: The corporation designated by the constitu- A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 105 tion as " the University of the State of New York " shall be governed and its corporate powers exercised by eleven regents, the same to be elected by the legisla- ture from those previously holding such offices, and so far as may be one from each judicial district, for terms respectively of one, two, Ihree, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten and eleven years, from the first day of April, 190-1, the terms of regents, previously in office, terminating on said first day of April except as before provided. Successors to the regents thus elected are to be chosen by the legislature in the second week of February in each year. Within ten days after the passage of this act, the legislature shall elect a com- missioner of education, who may or may not be a resident of the state of New York. He shall receive an annual salary of $7,500 and $1,500 in lieu of travel- ing and other expenses. He shall enter upon the per- formance of his duties April 1, 1901. He shall serve for the term of six years, unless sooner removed for cause by the board of regents, and the legislature shall fill any vacancy that may occur during such period of six years, and all successors in office after such term of six years, shall serve during the pleasure of the board of regents. The offices of Superintendent of Public Instruction and secretary of the regents are abolished from April 1, 1901, and their powers and duties shall be exercised and performed by the commissioner of education. All the powers and duties of the board of regents in relation to the supervision of elementary and secondary schools, including all schools except colleges, technical and professional schools, are devolved upon the commissioner of education, who shall also act as the executive officer of the regents. It has, of course, been noted that in the statistics defectives' "* that have been herein tabulated, appropriations to schools for defectives and for Indians have been in- cluded. This review would be incomplete if some addi- tional facts concerning these were not presented. The formal connection between the public school system of the state and institutions for the education of defec- tives dates from the establishment of the Department of Public Instruction. In 1818, private benevolence opened a school in New York city for the instruction of deaf-mutes according to methods recently developed in Europe. In 1833, a school for educating the blind 106 Department op Public Instruction was similarly established in the same city. In both these institutions certain pupils had been maintained at public expense, but, previously to 1853, there had been but liltle systematic utilization of their advan- tages. Among the powers and duties, devolved upon the Superintendent of Public Instruction, were the appointment to these two institutions of pupils to be supported by the state, and a general oversight of their care and education. These appointments, however, were restricted to those who had been residents of the state for three years, and who were between the ages of 12 and 25. The institutions are first mentioned in the report of the superintendent for 1855, when there were 10!) pupils in the school for the blind and 204 in that for deaf-mutes. In response to successive recom- mendations of state superintendents, the minimum age limit was reduced to eight years and finally to five, while the maximum for deaf-mutes was abolished, but the three years' residence 1 requirement remained, until, in 1903, it was reduced to one year. In .March, 1807, a school was opened in New York city, chiefly through Hebrew benevolence for "the improved instruction of deaf-mutes according to the articulate methods of Germany." Tn 1870, the city leased to the institution a site at the corner of Lexington avenue and Sixty- seventh street for !>!> years, at an annual rental of one dollar. Buildings were erected and it was authorized to receive state 1 and county pupils. In 1870, the Le Couteulx St Mary's school for the deaf was opened at Buffalo, and in 1S72 was allowed to receive public pupils. In L875, a school for deaf-mutes was established at Rome, chiefly at state expense, and, in 1876, another was opened at Rochester by private benevolence. In 1870, also, St Joseph's institution for the instruction of deaf-mutes was founded at Fordham by a society of Roman Catholic women. All these schools were authorized to receive state and county pupils. The same year, St Joseph's institute at Ford- ham occupied new buildings which it had erected upon a farm at Westchester, exclusively for hoys. For the school year of 1002-3 there were reported in attendance at all the schools for deaf-mutes 1,41)5 pupils, and at the schools for the blind, 321. This increase from 204 of the former and 109 of the latter, since 1854, is due not only to the growth of population, but to the removal A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 107 of age restrictions, and the growing popular interest in the education of these unfortunates. In methods of instruction, (he New York schools have been among the foremost to devise or adopt the best. The Kochester school has acquired a national reputation for discard- ing all sign language, and depending upon the oral and manual methods of expression, together with reading and writing. The Department of Public Instruction has not usually interfered with the technical methods of the different schools, yet it did once enforce a change in the New York institution and the present superin- tendent has demanded that prominence should be given to the teaching of English, with which compliance has in every instance been prompt and cordial. Industrial education is a part of the work in every school. The children are prepared to earn their living, and very few of those taught in these institutions become paupers. With the increase of population and the greater care for the unfortunate, the calls upon the institution for tin 1 blind steadily increased, at length exceeding its capacity; and, in 1868, a state institution was located at Batavia for children north of the Harlem river. Appointment to this school was vested in local authorities and its special supervision en- trusted to the State Board of Charities. Hence, although the law imposed upon the superintendent the same oversight, as in respect to the other schools for defectives, it was not exercised by the superintendent until the last year when the inspector of the Depart- ment visited the institution and found it in excellent condition, its working being substantially along the same lines as that of the New York school. Previous to 1846, the state made no special provision schools for for the education of Indian children. There were a Imlians few mission schools and the children were permitted to attend the public schools of the towns embracing the reservations. The school authorities of these towns were also allowed to enumerate the Indian children in drawing public money. The schools, being located for the convenience of the whites, were accessible to but few of the Indians. The injustice of granting public money, on the basis of children who could nor reach the schools, led to an act in 1846, restricting the enumeration of Indian children to those who had actually attended school three months in the preceding 108 Department op Public Instruction school year. Another law, enacted in 1846, marks the beginning of educational care of the Indians. It pro- vides for building schoolhouses and appropriates an annual sum for the support of schools for five years on four reservations, as follows : Allegany $300, St Regis |200, Cattaraugus $350, Onondaga $250. It was con- templated that the Indians should contribute both to the erection of the buildings and to the support of the schools. It is stated that they manifested much gratitude for the promised aid. By the census of 1845, there were 3,753 Indians in the state, of whom 984 were between the ages of six and sixteen years. By the census of 1900, there were more than 5,000. In 1847, a house was built and furnished at St Regis at a cost of 1250, and one at Onondaga for $337.50. Schools were opened in both, the following year, the one at St Regis attaining an. average attendance of 50 out of 81 children in the district. In 1848, the Indians con- tributing $300, a $000 schoolhouse was erected at Cattaraugus, and one built by the state on the Allegany reservation. The same year $240 was appropriated and the town of Southampton, L. I., was required to contribute $80 annually for two years, for the support of a school for the Shinnecocks. In 1849, this school was carried on for six months, with a teacher employed at $12 a mouth, and a later report tells of a teacher in the same school at $2 a week. In 1855, two schools were opened on the Tonawanda reservation and one among the Tuscaroras, the Indians contributing liber- ally toward the buildings. In 1857, two schools were established for the remnant of the Oneidas, who, though their lands had been allotted in severalty, were too poor to sustain schools of their own. These schools were supported until 1889, when they were discontinued on recommendation of Superintendent Draper. The first schc/ol for the Poospatucks Avas not established until 1875. The act of 1856 placed the Indian schools under the direct charge of the Superintendent of Public Instruc- tion. The number of districts has gradually increased to meet the necessity of accommodating the children. In 1866, there were, exclusive of the two for the Oneidas, 23 schools each with one teacher. As more and more children were brought into the schools, other teachers were added at Onondaga, and new districts A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 109 formed on the other reservations. The latest of these districts are the fifth in 1889, and the sixth in 1899, at St Regis, the fourth at Tonawanda in 1900, and the seventh at Allegany in 1903. The building for the last will be completed so as to open a school in the spring of 1901. There is also a necessity for two new dis- tricts on the St Regis reservation. In the Indian, as in the white schools, careful supervision is of the utmost importance. At first, the schools were in the hands of the state agents and special commissioners for building the houses who acted concurrently with representative Indians. Later, local superintendents were appointed with powers analogous to those of boards of education, but subject to the direct approval or veto of the State Superintendent by whom they were appointed. Some of these local authorities were, from the first, intelligent, conscientious men, but others studied only their own interests, and " graft " was practiced at the expense of the Indians. The present local superintendents are all practical educators, honest and capable. Their powers, however, have been limited by lack of funds and the impossibility of keep- ing the central authority in touch with the actual con- ditions. The same difficulty was found in dealing with other state schools where support was had directly from Albany. The Superintendent of Public Instruc- tion therefore, in January, 1900, appointed an inspector of normal schools, giving him also charge of the Indian schools and schools for defectives. Results of his over- sight have been given in the annual reports of the Department. He found most, of the Indian school- houses out of repair and meanly furnished. Sen is were uncomfortable, blackboards, charts, globes and maps lacking, and the books entirely unadapted to the wants of the children. The grounds were uninviting and the outhouses dilapidated and untidy. So rapidly as funds would permit these evils have been remedied. Two new schoolhouses have been built and three more are approaching completion. The out-buildings are clean and neat. Charts and kindergarten material have been supplied and the old textbooks replaced by modern ones. As early as 1852, the state appropriated f 1,000 for the support of Indian children to be educated at the normal schools. They came gladly and made fair 110 Department of Public Instruction progress, but it was reported that they " flocked together," and the next year, a similar appropriation was made for their education at academies, not more than two being allowed at the same institution. In 1854, another experiment was made appropriating $1,000 for the education of Indian youth at farms and in country schools. None of these later experiments were successful and the state returned to the normal school plan, and has most of the time supported one or more Indian youths who were taking the regular course in these schools preparatory to teaching. Siuce the establishment of Government schools for Indians at Hampton. Carlisle and Philadelphia they have been quite extensively patronized by New York Indians. So also have the Quaker boarding school at Tunessasa and the Thomas Orphan Asylum near Versailles. A few children also at lend the public schools near the reservations, or in places where the parents are tem- porarily located. There are reported, for the past year, in these various schools, aside from the district or state schools, 363 pupils. It may be added that many of the Indian normal graduates have made excellent teachers for their own people. The following are the statistical and financial reports for the year ending July 31, 1003, the close of the ninth year of the present administration : Statistical Cities Towns State Statistics Number of districts 1,043 10,683 11,726 for tne last Number of teachers employed for 160 (lavs year of or more 16 633 15 g 20 34450 Superin- Number of children of school aire 1.264.431 476.329 1,740,760 temleiit Number of male teachers em]. loved 1.937 2,972 4,909 Skinners Number of female teachers employed 2n.7u0 14,216 34.916 adminii- Number of children in attendance 827.541 429.333 1.256.874 • ration Average daily attendance 630,855 297,480 9_s.33.". Visitations of commissioners 11,815 11,815 Number of volumes in libraries 719,691 998. 2;0 1,717,951 Number of log schoolhouses 15 IS Number of frame schoolhotises 176 9,553 9,729 Number of brick schoolhouses S61 997 1,838 Number of stone schoolhouses 6 290 296 Whole number of schoolhouses 1,043 10,835 11.878 Financial Receipts Cities Towns State Amount on hand August 1, 1902. $17, 334, 554 93 $640,293 54 $17,974,S48 47 Amount apportioned to districts 1,943.326 60 2,044,730 31 3,938,056 91 Proceeds of gospel and school lands 6,016 60 32.819 19 38.S35 79 Received from board of regents. 131.760 91 154.9138 63 2S6.679 57 Raised by tax 23,804.549 87 5,211.37) ■»! 29,075,920 51 Teachers' board 7.09S 89 7.098 89 Tuition 44,050 44 186.612 62 230.663 06 Other sources 7,651.72326 610.678 71 8.262,40197 Total $50,975,9S2 61 $8,8SS,522 56 $59,864,505 17 A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 111 Tayments Cities Towns State For teachers' wages $18,509,203 19 $5,461,963 50 $23,971,166 G9 Tuition to districts under con- tract 38.46175 38,46175 Transportation to districts un- der contract 24,818 84 24,818 84 Libraries 69,997 00 ns.-'.is us 158,295 08 For school apparatus 1,133,528 01 61,210 46 1,194,738 47 For school houses, sites. re- pairs, etc 8.926.964 17 984,959 26 9,911,923 43 Forfeited in supervisors' hands 880 26 880 26 For free textbooks 115,449 50 115,449 50 For all other expenditures 4,479,444 62 1,522,917 21 6,002.361 S3 Amount on hand July 31, 1903... 17,741,396 12 703,013 20 18,446,409 32 Total $50,975,982 61 $8,888,522 56 $59,864,505 17 Deducting' from the total under the head of pay- ments the amount on hand it appears that the actual expense of the common schools of the state for the year ending July 31, 1903 was $41,418,095.85. The average annual salaries of teachers in the cities, for the last school year was $992.08, in the towns $345.26 and in the state $695.76; the average weekly salaries in the cities was $25.44, in the towns $10.10 and in the state $19.65. The average annual cost per pupil, based on average daily attendance was, in the cities $52.68, in the towns $27.51 and in the state $14.62; the average annual cost per pupil, based on number of children attending school was in the cities $40.16, in the towns $19.06 and in the state $32.95; the average annual cost per pupil based on total population, census of 1900, was in the cities $6.78, in the towns $3.46 and in the state $5.70. The value of schoolhouses and sites was in the cities $82,174,215, in the towns $17,491,026 and in the state $99,668,241. The total cost of maintain- ing the normal schools was $406,675.92, and the average cost per graduate of these schools (for 1902) was $356.21. The average cost of each graduate from train- ing class and school was $68.71. The cost of main- taining teachers institutes was $11,416.14, and for each teacher in attendance $2.28. The expenses of Indian schools were $14,198.78, of schools for defectives $269,- 154.65, of pictorial instruction $38,000, and of enforcing the compulsory education law $15,473.89. The teachers' licenses held were state 1,187, college graduate 751, normal diplomas 7.317, training class or school 8,459, local and commissioners' 19,867. The average length of the school term was in the cities 195 days, in the towns 171 and in the state 177. The districts observing Arbor day were in the cities 45, and in the 112 Department of Public Instruction towns 9.74X ; the number of trees planted was in the cities 729 and in the towns 14,370. The number of children committed to truant schools was, in the cities, 1,260, and in the towns 96; the number of truants arrested by attendance officers was in the cities 27,671) and in the towns 778 ; the number of parents prosecuted was 613 in the cities and 37S in the towns. The total number of pupils registered in all departments of nor- mal schools (for 1902) was 9,284, the number in normal departments only, 4,341, and the number graduating was 1 ,046. The number of training classes and schools (1903) was 118 j the number attending the same 2,559, and the number of certificates issued 1,494. The num- ber of teachers institutes was 111 and the number of teachers in attendance 8,099. The number of private schools in the state was 867, with an attendance of 188,484. ti"™ P s a ta*tis- The tremendous growth, during the existence of the ties and Department of Public Instruction is seen in two items cuncla- x sions alone— in that the schools, in 1853, cost but $2,469,- 248.52 and $1,931,870.18 were expended for teacher's wages, as against $41,418,095.85 and $23,971,166.19 respectively in 1903. With these latest data of the Department, this review nears its end. The history of the common schools of New York has been traced from their beginning in 1633, in the humble domicile of Adam Roelandson, in New Amsterdam to their present magnificent development. While, it is believed, that nearly every phase of that development has been touched upon, if not fully described — with the excep- tion of the curriculums to which an expert treatise should be devoted — particular stress has been laid upon the financial aspects, as they have revealed themselves successively, from the slender stipend allotted to the first schoolmaster by the Dutch West India Company to the two score million dollars and more now expended for popular education by this imperial commonwealth ; and, as a measure of progress, there is none more accurate than that of money. What the schools were doing at any given date may be fairly discerned by what they were costing. Are the children being gathered in the schools; is the number of illiterates decreasing; are sightly buildings being erected, and do they improve in design, appointments and utility; are teachers re- ceiving due compensation ; are they more and more A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 113 dedicated to their calling; are standards of education exalted, and are the facilities the system affords com- mensurate with its constantly expending needs? All these questions and others that might be asked are answered in the statistical and financial tables that the superintendents have collated, a considerable number of which have here been reproduced, and which record the onward course of education as precisely as the ther- mometer marks the degrees of temperature. In conclusion, it is submitted that the claim of the educational supremacy of New York, preferred at the outset, has been sustained by the facts adduced. First, in population, in manufactures, in commerce, in wealth and in the arts of civilization, she is also first in the training of her youth for the vocations of life and the obligations of citizenship. She founded the common school in the land; she unified its government in a headship, with powers from and responsibility to her alone; she has employed the most effective agencies f'or its betterment; if she has not originated all meas- ures for its advancement, she has been prompt in adopting those elsewhere initiated, enlarging their scope and perfecting their application; and she has been open-handed in its support until throughout her borders, the school bell rings for all her children, with- out distinction of sex, color, or condition, her latest mandate being that the doors of the high schools shall open " without money and without price " to all, who, irrespective of their residence within the state, desire to enter them. From this review, the commanding position which the Department of Public Instruction has had in the educational progress of the state is clearly apparent. That which has been wrought in this regard, within the last fifty years, far exceeds all that had been accomplished in the two hundred and twenty years preceding. Much of this progress is to be ascribed to the larger enlightenment that came with the advancing years of the nineteenth century and much t'o the abundant means that the state has provided, but much also is due to the fact that the common school system has been under a separate department of the government, invested with large, and even extraordi- nary executive, administrative and judicial functions, for the exercise of which it has been amenable only to the sovereign state. At the close of these fifty S 114 Department op Public Instruction memorable years of organization and achievement the Department of Public Instruction ceases to exist, but it is believed that under the Commissioner of Education its jurisdiction will not be restricted nor its powers abridged, and that he will be true to its inspiration and historic leading. VICTOR M. RICE Victor Moreau Kice, the first and fourth Superin- tendent of Public Instruction, the son of the Honorable William Rice, originally from Washington county, but one of the early settlers in Chautauqua, was born at Mayville in the latter county, April 5, 1818. Having ob- tained his preliminary education in the schools of his native town, he entered Allegheny college, at Meadville, Pennsylvania, and was graduated from that institution in the class of 1841. In 1842, he studied law in May- ville, and continued it at intervals, being admitted to the bar in 1815. In 1813, he removed to Buffalo and was employed as teacher of Latin, language, penmanship, and bookkeeping in a private school which subse- quently became the Buffalo high school. In 1815, he opened an evening commercial school for clerks and young men with daily occupat ions. From 1816 to 1818, he was the editor of the Cataract afterward the Western Temperance Standard, but resumed teach- ing in the latter year. In L852, he was elected city superintendent of schools. In 1853, he was president of the New York teachers' association, with which, for several years, he had been prominently identified. In 1851, he became the first State Superintendent of Pub- lic Instruction, and the work of organizing the depart- ment devolved upon him. Features of his first administration were the creation of the office of school commissioner and the compilation of the Code of Public Instruction. Returning to Buffalo, he was elected, as a Republican to the assembly of 1801, in which he was chairman of the committee on college:'., academies and common schools. In 18G2, he was again elected Superintendent of Public Instruction and was reelected in 1865. He was especially interested in the establishment of Indian schools, and was form- ally adopted by the Seneca tribe and named Sagowada (the big tree). The conspicuous achievement of his VICTOR M. RICE Superintendent 1854-1857, 1862-1868 HENRY II. VAN DYCK Superintendent 1857-1861 A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 115 later service was that of the abolition of the rate bill — the making of the common schools of the state abso- lutely free. Upon retiring from the superintendency in 1868, he became president of the American Popular Life Insurance Company and was afterward president of the Metropolitan Bank of New York City until his death which occurred October 18, 1869. HENRY H. VAN DYCK Henry Herbert Van Dyck, the second Superintendent of Public Instruction, was born in Kinderhook, Colum- bia county, N. Y., in 1809. He received his education in the schools of Kinderhook and, at an early age, was apprenticed to the printers' trade, which he acquired before he was twenty-one years old. Upon attaining his majority, he became the editor of the Goshen Independent Republican. He was subsequently one of the owners of the Albany Argus. His early politi- cal affiliations were with the Free Soil wing of the Democratic party. He was prominent in the revolt of that element, under the lead of Martin Van Buren, in 1848. against the regular nominations of the party, which contributed to the election of President Taylor, but joined the Republican party upon its organization, and was a candidate for presidential elector on the Fremont ticket in 1856. He was elected Superin- tendent of Public Instruction in 1857 and reelected in 1860 serving until April 9, 1861, when he resigned to accept the appointment of State Superintendent of the Banking Department, in which capacity he re- mained until August 9, 1865, when he was made assist- ant United States Treasurer, in New York, by President Johnson. This position he resigned in 1869 on account of failing health. His health being restored he became president of the American Safe Deposit Company and was acting as such at the time of his death January 22, 1888, at the age of 79 years. He was also for a time president of the Erie Transportation Company. In the various financial trusts, which he discharged, he was highly esteemed and useful. 116 Department of Public Instruction EMERSON W. KEYES Emerson W. Keyes, the third Superintendent of Pub- lic Instruction, in the eighth generation of the Keyes family in America, was born in Jamestown, Chautau- qua county, where his father had settled in 1S20, on the 80th of June 1828. At the age of 16, he began his teaching career in a district school in his native county. He was graduated from the Albany normal school in 1818, meanwhile supporting himself by teach- ing in various places. Immediately after graduation, he taught at Castleton-on-the-Hudson and in 1849 he taught in the Genesee and Wyoming seminary, Alex- ander, N. Y., of which Norman F. Wright, father of the present second Deputy Superintendent A. M. Wright, was then principal. In 1850 he took charge of the department in English in Homer academy. In 1856, he was engaged in the public schools of New York city. In 1857, he was appointed by Superintendent Van Dyck, Deputy Superintendent of Public Instruc- tion and served as such until April 9, 1861, when, upon the resignation of Mr. Van Dyck he became acting superintendent and filled out the term, retiring in April, 1862. He was a candidate for the succession in 1862, but was defeated in the caucus of his party by a majority of three votes. He was deputy superin- tendent under his successful competitor, Victor M. Rice, for the ensuing two years. In 1865, he was appointed Deputy Superintendent of the Banking Department of the state, in which he remained eight years, being acting superintendent for several months toward the close of the period. He was admitted to the bar in 1868, and, upon leaving the Banking Depart- ment, practiced his profession in New York, until he was, in 1883, appointed chief clerk in the office of the Superintendent of Schools in Brooklyn, which position he retained until his death, October 17, 1897, at the age of 69 years. Mr. Keyes was an author of wide repute upon educational, banking and legal subjects, and a public speaker upon various themes. Among his publications are the " History of Savings Banks in the United States," "A Special Report on Savings Banks," " The Code of Public Instruction in the State of New York," and " Principles of Civil Government, Exempli- fied in the State of New York." He also edited I§#p fig* EMERSON W. KEYES Superintendent 1861-1862 ABRAM B. WEAVER Superintendent 1808-1874 A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 117 " Keyes's Court of Appeals Kecord," in four volumes, and prepared and revised the article on " Savings Banks," in Johnson's Cyclopedia. His last public address was that on the occasion of the fiftieth anni- versary of the founding of the State normal college in Albany, June, 1891. ABRAM B. WEAVER Abram B. Weaver, the fifth Superintendent of Public Instruction, was born in Deerfield, Oneida county, which has always been his legal residence, on the 18th of December, 1830. He was the son of George M. Weaver and Delia Bellinger, both of whom were descendants of the German stock which first settled the Mohawk valley. His father is reputed to have been the first white child born in Oneida county. His preliminary education was in the common school of his town and in Utica academy, in the latter under a most excellent classical teacher, George Spencer. In September, 1847, he entered Hamilton college and was graduated with the class of 1851. He pursued some legal studies in college, under that distinguished in- structor, Professor Theodore W. Dwight, and, after graduation, resumed his preparation for the bar in the office of Spencer and Kernan in Utica. He was ad- mitted to the profession in 1853, but was engaged in active practice for only a few years. When the present system of school supervision was introduced, he was appointed school commissioner for the first district of Oneida county by the board of supervisors, in 1856, and, in the fall of 1857, was elected to the same office, by popular vote, for the further term of three years. He accepted the nomination of the Democratic party for the assembly, in the first district of Oneida county, in 1861, and was defeated by the rejection of a few clipped ballots, but was returned to that body, the ensuing year, and served therein during the sessions of 1863, '64 and '65. In the latter year, he was the candidate of his party for speaker. He was made a trustee of Cornell university in 1865, and assisted in organizing that institution, serving until 1874. He practiced law in the city of New York from 1865 to 1868, in partnership with Judge James Matthews and was appointed by the court an examiner of candidates 118 Department op Public Instruction for admission to the bar. In 1868, he was elected Superintendent of Public Instruction and was re- elected in 1871. While superintendent, it devolved upon him to organize six of the eight normal schools then authorized by law. Since his retirement, he has lived on his ancestral home in Deerfleld, frequently, however, being requested to accept political preferment. He was the candidate of his party for representative in congress in 1870, for state senator in 1885, and for presidential elector in 1900. In 1902, he was again nominated for congress, but declined to make the canvass. NEIL GILMOUR Neil Gilmour, the sixth Superintendent of Public Instruction, was born at Paisley, Scotland, on the 18th of January, 1810. He was prepared for college in his native land, came to this country in 1856 and, enter- ing Union college, was graduated from that institution with the class of 1860. He worked his way through college and for a year after graduation, taught in the academy at Corning. He then went to Ballston Springs, which was thereafter his home, and taught for several years in the academy in that place, of which his brother, the Rev. James Gilmour was the principal. He early became interested in politics and was in frequent demand as a speaker at the meetings of the Republican party, with which he was identified. In 1866, he was elected school commissioner for the first district of Saratoga county, and was again elected in 1872. Before the expiration of his latter term, he was chosen Superintendent of Public Instruction and resigned as commissioner to accept the higher prefer- ment. He was reelected superintendent in 1877 and in 1880, being the first superintendent to hold for three consecutive terms. Shortly after his retirement and, under the administration of President Arthur, he was appointed registrar of the land office at Bismarck, N. D., and discharged the duties of that office, until his resignation upon the incoming of President Cleve- land. Returning to Ballston, he accepted the position of general manager of the Aetna Life Insurance Com- pany for the state of New York and acted as such until 1896, after which he engaged in the practice of NEIL GILMOUR Superintendent 1874-1883 WILLIAM B. RUGGLES Superintendent 1883-1886 A REVIEW OP ITS ADMINISTRATION 119 law until his death March 31, 1901. He was an attrac- tive public speaker and Mas closely associated with the life of his community, being, at the time of his death a director of the First National Bank, a trustee of the Cemetery Association and also of the Ballston Springs Improvement Association. WILLIAM B. RUGGLES William Benjamin Buggies, the seventh Superinten- dent of Public Instruction, the son of William and Mary Buggies, was born in Bath, Steuben county, May 11, 1827. He attended the public school in Bath, but at the age of thirteen was in a printing office in his native village, trying lo work his way up from the case to the higher education. In 1816 he entered Hamilton college at the beginning of the sophomore year, and was graduated with high honors in the class of 1819. Soon after graduation he went to Atlanta, Georgia, and became the editor and publisher of the Atlanta Intelligencer a leading Democratic journal of the south. In 1851 he was elected and in 1855 re- elected an alderman of the city of Atlanta, and thus began his long and varied political career. Disposing of his paper, four years before the outbreak of the civil war, he came north, and in 1857 began the study of law in the school connected with Hamilton col- lege, under the direction of Theodore W. Dwight. He was admitted to practice in the summer of 185S, contin- ued his legal studies in the office of Judge Charles 11. Doolittle, in Utica, for about a year, and, in 1859, com- menced the practice of his profession in Bath, in which he rapidly gained distinction. In 1X07 he was chosen a trustee of Bath, and in 1876 and 1877 was a member of assembly from Steuben county. In that body he was a member of the judiciary committee and was especially prominent in the discussion of educational topics, taking ground in favor of the abolition of the normal schools. In 1878 he was appointed first deputy attorney- general under the Hon. Augustus Schoonmaker, and was continued in the place by the Hon. Hamilton Ward, who was not of the same political faith as himself. In 1883 he was elected Superintendent of Public 120 Department of Public Instruction Instruction and served nearly through the term, resigning, however, January 1, 1886, to accept the posi- tion of deputy superintendent and legal counselor of the New York State Insurance Department under Superintendent Maxwell, and remained in that capac- ity until 1891, when he resigned. He continued to reside in Albany until his death, January 1, 1902. He had published official reports to the legislature, opinions under the school laws, and addresses delivered before various educational institu- tions. He was a delegate to the Democratic National Convention at St. Louis in 1876, which nominated Samuel J. Tilden for the presidency. JAMES E. MORRISON James Edward Morrison, the eighth Superintendent of Public Instruction, was born in the city of New York in 1843 of parents of Irish ancestry. His pre- liminary education was obtained in the public schools of the metropolis and he was graduated from the col- lege of the City of New York in 1861, and from the Columbia university law school in 1869. He taught in Christ's Church academy at Oyster Bay; in gram- mar school 19, New York city and was subse- quently and until January, 1879, professor of history and belles-lettres in the college of the City of New York, when he resigned to become private secretary to Mayor Cooper, which position he held for two years. He then served a short time as member of the board of police commissioners of the City of New York, and, in 1882, represented the sixteenth district of New York county in the assembly. He served as Deputy State Superintendent of Public Instruction under the Hon. William B. Ruggles, from April 7, 1883, until January 1, 1886, when he became State Superintendent, upon the resignation of Mr. Ruggles, and acted as such until the expiration of the term, April 7, 1886, on which date he was appointed Chief Examiner in the State Civil Service Commission and continued as such until his sudden death in Buffalo, whither he had gone to con- duct examinations, June 14, 1887, at the age of 44 years. A meeting of his friends was held at the capitol, in Albany, over which the Hon. Charles R. Skinner presided, and suitable resolutions commemora- JAMES E. MORRISON Superintendent 1886 ANDREW S. DRAPER Superintendent 1886-1892 A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 121 tive of his work were adopted, and a committee was appointed to attend his funeral. In addition to his political and educational preferments, Mr. Morrison was known as an orator and writer upon various subjects and as a scholar of more than ordinary attainments. He was highly esteemed in the Masonic Fraternity and for a time, was at the head of the New York Grand Chapter of Royal Arch Masons. He con- tributed to the press many articles and editorials on Masonic Law, in which he was regarded an authority. He was a member of the Democratic State Committee for many years and was reading clerk of the Demo- cratic National Conventions of 1880 and 1884. ANDREW S. DRAPER Andrew Sloan Draper, of Puritan and Scotch-Irish lineage, the son of Sylvester Bigelow and Jane Sloan Draper, was born in Westford, Otsego county, N. Y., June 21, 1848. When seven years old, the family moved to Albany. His early education was in the common schools of Westford and Albany. He entered the Albany academy in 18G3 and was graduated there- from in 18GG. The year after graduation, he was a teacher of mathematics, bookkeeping, etc., in the West- ford Literary Institute. In the winter of 1867-68 he taught mathematics in the Albany academy, and, the next year was principal of the graded school in East Worcester, Otsego county. He was engaged for four summers in the Albany office of C. & D. Whitney, a large lumber firm, and traveled extensively for it through the Atlantic coast states. This was followed by a course of study in the Albany Law School (Union university) from which he received the degree of LL.B. and was admitted to the bar in 1871. He formed a partnership with his cousin, Alden Chester, now a jus- tice of the New York Supreme Court, the firm becom- ing later Paddock, Draper and Chester, and again Draper and Chester. He was also deeply interested in politics, having begun to make Republican speeches ns early as 1868. In 1876 he was president of a uni- formed political club of 600 members called th* " Minute Men," from 1880 until 1883 president of th« Albany Grant club of 3,000 members and was ire quently a delegate to local and state conventions of his 122 Department of Public Instruction party. In 1880 he became a member of the Albany county Republican committee and was its chairman for three years. In 1883 he was elected to the Republican state committee and was the chairman of its executive committee in 1S84, and was also a delegate to the Republican National Convention of 1884. In 1878, he was chosen a member of the Albany board of educa- tion and served therein for three years, and was for a time a trustee of the State normal college. He was a member of the New York assembly in 1881, serving on the committees of Ways and Means, Judiciary, Pub- lic Printing and Public Education. In 1884, he was ap- pointed by President Arthur a member of the court of Alabama claims — a court to hear and determine the individual claims against the $15,500,000 awarded by the High Tribunal at Geneva under the treaty of Wash- ington with Great Britain. He was elected State Superintendent of Public Instruction in 18S6 and was reelected in 1889. During his tenure he accomplished a number of educational reforms and had national reputation as an educator. He was superintendent of instruction in Cleveland, Ohio, 1802-94, and has been president of the University of Illinois since 1894. The University advanced from a faculty of 90 and a student body of 750 in 1894 to a faculty of 420 and a student body of 3,800 in 1904. In March, 1S9S, he was elected superintendent of schools of the Greater City of New York, but declined the position. In 1904, he was elected commissioner of education for the State of New York, entering upon his duties April 1. He was awarded the silver medal at the Paris Exposition for his monograph on the " Organization and Administra- tion of the American School System," and is the author of a book on the war with Spain, entitled " The Rescue of Cuba.' 5 He received the degree of LL.D. from Colgate in 1889 and from Columbia in 1903. He is widely known as a speaker and writer, especially upon educational topics. JAMES F. CROOKER Superintendent 1 892-1 895 A REVIEW OF ITS ADMINISTRATION 123 JAMES F. CROOKER James F. Crooker, the tenth Superintendent of Pub- lic Instruction, was born in the hamlet of Christian Hollow, in the town of Onondaga, in the county of the same name, August 12, 1834. He is of New Eng- land origin, his family being among the settlers of Stratford, Conn. His father was a farmer, nearly all his life, dying at a good old age in 1890. His mother's maiden name was Elizabeth Yates, a descendant of Governor Joseph C. Yates, of this state. She died in L838. In 1830, the parents of James F. Crooker re- moved to Erie county, where nearly all his life has been passed. His early education was acquired in the schools of his neighborhood and, at the age of sixteen, he taught a district school in the same vicinity. He subsequently studied in the Springville academy, from which he was graduated in 1853. He then accepted a position in a mercantile house in New York city, which he was compelled by ill health to resign, after a service of about three years. He returned to Erie county and, after recuperating his health at the pater- nal homestead, became the principal of one of the smaller schools of Buffalo and as the principal of a number of the schools in that city remained a teacher for about twenty years. In the fall of 1881, and while principal of No. 31, the largest school in the city, he was elected superintendent of education of Buffalo for a term of two years, and was reelected four time3, more than once receiving majorities considerably in f excess of other candidates upon the same ticket — the Democratic. In the eleventh year of his local super- intendency he was chosen by the legislature State Superintendent of Public Instruction, in February, 1892, and served until the end of the term in April, 1895. Since retiring from the superintendency, he has filled a number of local offices in Buffalo, and was once the candidate of his party for the city superintendency of schools. CHARLES R. SKINNER Charles Rufus Skinner, the eleventh Superintendent of Public Instruction, son of Avery and Charlotte Stcbbins Skinner, was born in Union Square, Oswego county, August 4, 1844. He was educated in the com- 1.24 Department op Public Instruction nion schools of his native town, the Mexico academy and the Clinton Liberal Institute. From 18G7 until 1870, he was engaged in business in New York city. He then settled in Watertown, Jefferson county, and from 1870 until 1874 was the business manager of the Watertown Daily Times. He was elected, as a Kepub- lican, to the assembly of the state of New York, for the years 1877, 1878, 1879, 1880 and 1881 ; was a mem- ber of several important committees and frequently participated in the debates of that body. In 1881, the Honorable Warner Miller having resigned his seat in the house of representatives, upon being chosen a United States senator, Mr. Skinner was elected to fill the vacancy thus created in the forty-seventh congress, and was reelected to the forty-eighth, in 1883. In 1886, he was appointed by the Honorable Andrew S. Draper Deputy State Superintendent of Public Instruction and served as such until 1892; in that year he became supervisor of teachers' institutes and teachers' training classes, under Superintendent Crooker; in 1S95, he was chosen by the legislature State Superintendent of Pub- lic Instruction and was reelected to the same office in 1898 and 1901. He was president of the National Educational Association in 1896. He has delivered many addresses at political, patriotic and educational gatherings and is the author of " Commercial Advant- ages of Watertown, N. Y." (1876) ; New York Ques- tion Book" (1S90) ; "Arbor Day Manual" (1891) and " Manual for Patriotism for the Schools of New York " (1900) . He received the degree of Master of Arts from Hamilton college in 1889, that of Doctor of Laws from Colgate university in 1895, and that of Doctor of Letters from Tufts college, Massachusetts,, in 1901. CHARLES R. SKINNER Superintendent 1895 1904