Littleton, mass. 
 historical sketch, 
 
 HARWOOD. 
 
J.^' 
 
 ^^_^Jd^. \^aX{)~^L,1^ <^^^<-f 
 
 
 
 Ufe::f7^ ^^4^^/^^^^^--^ 
 
^:Jt^A ^'~ 
 
OF LIT 
 
 TON. 
 
 BY HERBERT JOSEPH HARWOOD. 
 
 \^Repriided from the '' Hisiory of Middlesex Counttj, Massachusetts. "'\ 
 
 CHAPTER I. 
 
 The origin of the Indian town of Nasliobah, which 
 once occupied the greater part of the territory now 
 Littleton, is traceable directly to Rev. John Eliot, the 
 apostle to the Indiana and the translator of the Bible 
 into the Indian language. He began to preach to the 
 Indians iij. 1646 at Nonantum, a part of Newton. 
 Many became converted to Christianity and expressed 
 a desire to become civilized and to live more like 
 white people. Eliot advised them to adopt the gov- 
 ernment which Jethro proposed to Moses for the Is- 
 raelites in the wilderness (Exodus xviii. 21), and to 
 choose rulers of hundreds, of fifties and of tens; he 
 also advised that they live in towns apart from the 
 white people, and accordingly obtained from the Gen- 
 eral Court a grant of territory at Natick, where the 
 " praying Indians," as they were called, formed their 
 first town in 1651. 
 
 Other towns of the same kind were formed soon 
 after, and among them Nashobah. 
 
 The Indians of this neighborhood were among the 
 first to listen to Eliot's preaching, and Tahattawan 
 the elder, sachem of Nashobah, was, according to 
 Shattuck's " History of Concord," one of the first con- 
 verts. 
 
 Rev. Thomas Shepard, of Cambridge, in his "Clear 
 Sunshine of Gospel," speaking of the Indians and 
 Mr. Eliot's preaching, says : " The last efl'ect was their 
 desire of having a town given them within the bounds 
 of Concord near unto the English." 
 
 Among the orders and regulations for the Indians, 
 agreed to at Concord, January, 1646, is the following : 
 
 "29. They desire they may be a town and either 
 dwell on this side of Beaver Swamp (in Lincoln) or at 
 the East side of Mr. Flint's Pond." 
 
 It would seem from these facts that the praying In- 
 dians of this vicinity had it in mind to form a town in 
 or near Concord for several years before they were 
 granted the Nashobah plantation, and that they had 
 discussed different localities. 
 
 It would be interesting if we knew more about 
 Eliot's preaching to the Nashobah Indians, that he 
 
LITTLETON. 
 
 m 
 
 stood on such a spot on such a day, that he came 
 again on such a day, etc., etc. ; but I have been una- 
 ble to find any record of his coming to this vicinity. 
 That both Eliot and Gookin came here I have no 
 doubt, for it is known that they were in the habit of 
 going about to all the settlements of praying Indians. 
 From the fact that Tahattawan the cider was 
 among the first of the converts we may conclude that 
 he first listened to Eliot's preaching at Newton or in 
 that neighborhood, and it may be that by his invita- 
 tion the apostle afterwards came up into the wilder- 
 ness beyond Concord ; but these are mere conjec- 
 tures..). .;.,. 
 
 ..-^r In'May; l'"654, Mr. Eliot petitioned the Cieneral 
 Court for the incorporation of several Indian towns; 
 the part of the petition which interests us reads as 
 ,,i'foUows : J'-First, therefore the inhabitants of Nashoba 
 ^'living 7 or 8 milesywest of Concord, desire to have 
 liberty to make ^'TOwne in y' place, with due accom- 
 modations tiw^Veunto. And though Concord have 
 soiilfe c6riditional grants of lands y' way, yet I under- 
 stand that we shall have a loving and Christian agree- 
 ment betwixt them and the Indians." 
 
 The petition is dated Boston, 4th of the 3d (May), 
 1<354. 
 
 In the General Court records, under date of 14th 
 of May, 1(554, is the following : 
 
 " In an8» to the peticon of Mr. Juo. Elliott, on bfthalf of seuciall In- 
 dians, the Court graunta his reqnest, viz. ; liberty for the inhabitants 
 of Naeliop fXashobah] and to the inhabitants of Ogkoontiquonkames 
 [Marlborougii] and also to the inhabitants of Hasneniesncboth [Grafton] 
 to erect seuerall Indjan tonnes in the places propounded, wtb ronvejent 
 aconiodacou to each, provided they p'jiidice not any former grannts; 
 nor shall they dispose of it wtii out leave first had and obtajned from this 
 Court." 
 
 In reference to the incorporation of Nashobah, Mr. 
 Shattuck, in his " History of Concord," says : 
 
 "Nashohali, lying near Nagog Pond, partly in LiUlet<i)j.and partly in 
 .4cto», as now bounded, accordingly became an Imlian town ; aud here 
 a part of the Praying Indians in Concord, with olheiti in ftie vicinity, 
 gathered and adopted civil aud religious order, and had a Ruler and 
 other municipal officers, though no church was formed. Such as were 
 entitled to Christian ordinances probably went to Natick to celebrate 
 t!i6 communion after a church was organized there in 1660." 
 
 Let US hope that the last part of the quotation from 
 Mr. Shattuck is more trustworthy than the first ; 
 he gives no authority for saying that Nashobah 
 was " partly in Acton," and I am inclined to think 
 that he drew on his imagination for the statement, 
 as I am unable to find any authority for it what- 
 ever, while, on the contrary, I have been able to 
 locate the original Nashobah with tolerable accur- 
 acy, as I shall show hereafter, aud am morally cer- 
 tain that the town of Concord never had a valid 
 title to one inch of the land where the Indian town 
 was laid out, and consequently that it was never 
 "partly in Acton," which, as we all know, was set 
 off from Concord. 
 
 We will drop the question of boundary for the 
 present and take it up later. It may seem a little 
 peculiar that the white people, who had taken pos- 
 
 session of all Massachusetts, with very little regard 
 to the Indians, who had occupied it from time im- 
 memorial, should gravely grant back to them a 
 small portion with restrictions; but such is always 
 our " Indian policy." 
 
 The white people took possession of all the land 
 in the Colony by virtue of their charter from the 
 Crown of England, and the Crown protected them 
 merely by its power. 
 
 Thus we se? why it is that Indian deeds are aud 
 were of little value in conveying a title, for the 
 Indians, having no stable government, had no power 
 to enforce a title, and therefore a title acquired 
 from Indians could not stand against one from the 
 Crown. 
 
 Daniel (tookin, in his " Historical Collections of 
 the Indians in New England," chapter vii. J 10, 
 says : "Nashobah is the sixth praying Indian town. 
 This village i.s situated, in a manner, in the centre, 
 between (jhelmsford, Lancaster, Groton and Concord. 
 It lietii from Boston about twenty-five miles west 
 north west. The inhabitants are about ten families, 
 and consequently about fifty souls. 
 
 " The dimensions of this village is four miles square. 
 The land is fertile and well stored with meadows 
 and woods. It hath good ponds for fish adjoining 
 to it. The people live here, as in other Indian vil- 
 lages, upon planting corn, fishing, hunting and some- 
 times labouring with the English. Their ruler, of 
 late years, was John Ahatawance [Tahattawan], a 
 pious man. Since his decease, Pennakennit [or Pen- 
 nahannit] is the chief. Their teacher is named John 
 Thomas, a sober and pious man. His farther was 
 murthered by the Maquas in a secret manner, as he 
 was fishing for eels at his wear, some years since, dur- 
 ing the war. He was a pious and useful person, and 
 that place sustained a great loss in him. In this 
 village, as well in other old Indian plantations, 
 they have orchards of apples whereof they make 
 cider, which frt)me of them have not the wisdom and 
 grace to use for their comfort, but are prone to abuse 
 unto drunkenness. 
 
 " And although the laws be strict to suppress this 
 sin, and .some of their own rulers are very careful 
 and zealous in the execution of them, yet such is 
 the madness and folly of man naturally, that he 
 doth eagerly pursue after that which tendeth to his 
 own destruction. 
 
 " I have often seriously considered what course to 
 take to restrain this beastly sin of drunkenness 
 among them ; but hitherto cannot reach it. For if 
 it were possible, as it is not, to prevent the Eng- 
 lish selling them strong drink ; yet they, having a 
 native liberty to plant orchards and sow grain, as 
 barley and the like, of which they may and do 
 make strong drink that doth inebriate them, so that 
 nothing can overcome and conquer this exorbitancy 
 hut the sovereign grace of God in Christ, which is the 
 only antidote to prevent antl mortify the poison of sin. 
 
 •S")-- /SVo^/7 
 
WL 
 
LITTLETON. 
 
 O- 
 
 "Near unto this town is a pond, wlierein at some sea- 
 S sons there is a strange rumbling noise, as the In- 
 dians affirm ; the reason whereof is not yet known. 
 5c Some have conceived the hills adjacent are hollow, 
 wherein the wind being pent, is the cause of this 
 rumbling, as in earthquakes. 
 
 "At this place they attend civil and religious order, 
 as in other praying towns, and they have a constable 
 and other officers. 
 
 " This town was deserted during the Maquas War, 
 but is now again re-peopled and in a hopeful way to 
 prosper," 
 
 This, then, was the state of affairs in 1674, the date 
 of Gookin's writing. 
 
 The pond where the rumbling noise occurred is, of 
 course, Nagog. Traditions are plenty of rumbling 
 noises, sometimes said to be like the discharge of can- 
 non in the vicinity of Nashoba Hill, which is near 
 Nagog Pond, but I have not heard of any occurring 
 of late years. They were probably earthquakes. 
 
 John Ahatawance, mentioned byGookiu, was Ta- 
 hattawan the younger, son of the elder of the same 
 name. 
 
 Pennahannit, also called Captain Josiah, was the 
 ''marshal general" of all the praying Indian towns. 
 
 In the year following Gookin's account came King 
 Philip's War, which proved disastrous to the Nasho- 
 bah Indians, owing to the distrust of their loyalty to 
 the Colony, and fears of their joining Philip and per- 
 haps endangering their neighbors, the white people. 
 I have never found that there were any grounds for 
 these fears ; but no Indian was trusted, and the atroc- 
 ities of the hostile ones made the name Indian odious 
 everywhere. 
 
 In the Massachusetts Archives, vol. 30, page 185, I 
 find the following under date of November 19, 1675 : 
 
 " It is ordered By the Couosell that the comitte of militia of Concord 
 and the select men of that towne with the advice of Major Willard do 
 dispose & order matters referring to the Indians of Nashobah that 
 have subjected to this Govermou, 4 to sotle i secure y" in the towne of 
 Concord under the inspection of John Hoare of Concord ; (Who hath 
 manifested himself willing to to take sj"^ care of them & to secure them 
 by day & by night) k to see they bee imployd to laubor ; for their lively 
 hood that the country may be eased ; or in case they cannot or do not 
 agree wh John Hoare afforesaid y» they are inipoured to contract w^' 
 any other person or persons in the said towne, for the same end, or to 
 plasethesaid Indiansor ayof them to servise, provided the mayne end 
 bee attained vizt. : that the Indians may be imployed to laubor & pesarved 
 frondange & the country & towne secured, 
 
 '• Past by ye Councel 19th of November, 1075. 
 
 " E. R. S." 
 
 Also the following : 
 
 " 9 Dec, 1675. It is ordered that Major WiUard, Capt. Gookin with 
 Mr. Eliot by the first opportunity are to repayre to Concord and 
 Chelmsford & to esamin those Indians there, & to use their best en- 
 devor to settle them in such a posture either at Deare Island or in the 
 place where they live so y' they who are friendly to the English may 
 secured & and the English in those parts also secured & as much as may 
 satisfied with their settlement and the said comittce or any two or thre 
 of them 4 impoured to effect this matter A they are to use their best 
 indevor that those Indians may be imployd Jfc kept to lauber & take 
 care they be all disarmed. 
 
 " 9 December 75 Past by y Councel 
 
 " Edw. Rawson, Secy." 
 
 In accordance with these orders, the Indians of 
 Nashobah were taken to Concord and put in charge 
 of John Hoar, who kept them employed and contented 
 for a short time. Hoar was compensated for his 
 trouble by being exempted from impressment and, 
 perhaps, taxation. 
 
 Gookin, in his " History of the Christian Indians,'' 
 gives the following interesting account of this epi- 
 sode : 
 
 "About this time there befell another great trouble 
 and exercise to the Christian Indians of Nashobah, 
 who sojourned in Concord by order ; the matter was 
 this. The Council had, by several orders, empower- 
 ed a committee, who, with the consent of the select- 
 men of Concord, settled those Indians at that town, 
 under the government and tuition of Mr. John 
 Hoare ; the number of those Indians were about fifty- 
 eight of all sorts, whereof were not above twelve 
 able men, the rest were women and children. These 
 Indians lived very soberly, and quietly, and indus- 
 triously, and were all unarmed ; neither could any 
 of them be charged with any unfaithfulness to the 
 English interest. 
 
 " In pursuance of this settlement, Mr. Hoare had 
 begun to build a large and convenient work-house for 
 the Indians, near his own dwelling, which stood 
 about the midst of the town, and very nigh the town 
 watch-house. 
 
 " This house was made, not only to secure those 
 Indians under lock and key by night, but to employ 
 them and to set theiA to work by day, whereby they 
 earned their own bread, and in an ordinary way (with 
 God's blessing) would have lived well in a short time. 
 Bnt some of the inhabitants of the town, being in- 
 fluenced with a spirit of animosity and distaste 
 against all Indians, disrelished this settlement ; and 
 therefore privately sent to a Captain of the army, 
 [Captain Mosely] that quartered his company not 
 far otr at that time, of whom they had experience, 
 that he would not be backward to put in execution 
 anything that tended to distress the praying Indians ; 
 for this was the same man that had formerly, without 
 order, seized upon divers of the praying Indians at 
 Marlborough, which brought much trouble and dis- 
 quiet to the country of the Indians, and was a great 
 occasion of their defection ; as hath been above de- 
 clared. 
 
 " This Captain accordingly came to Concord with 
 a party of his men, upon the Sabbath day, into the 
 meeting-house, where the people were convened to 
 the worship of God. And after the exercise was 
 ended, he spake openly to the congregation to this 
 effect : 'That he understood there were some heathen 
 in the town, committed to one Hoare, which he was 
 informed were a trouble and disquiet to them ; there- 
 fore if they desired it, he would remove them to Bos- 
 ton ; ' to which speech of his, most of the people 
 being silent, except two or three that encouraged 
 him, he took, as it seems, the silence of the rest for 
 
LITTLETON. 
 
 consent ; and immediately after the assembly was 
 dismissed, be went with three or four files of men, 
 and a hundred or two of the people, men, women and 
 children, at his heels, and marched away to Mr. 
 Hoare's house and there demanded of him to see the 
 Indians under his care. Hoare opened the door and 
 showed them to liim, and they were all numbered 
 and found there; the Captain then said to Mr. Hoare, 
 ' that he would leave a corporal and soldiers to secure 
 them ; ' but Mr. Hoare answered, ' there was no need 
 of that, for they were already secured, and were com- 
 mitted to him by order of the Council, and he would 
 keep and secure them.' But yet the Captain left his 
 corporal and soldiers there, who were abusive enough 
 to the poor Indians by ill language. The next morn- 
 ing the Captain came again to take the Indians and 
 send them to Boston. But Mr. Hoare refused to 
 deliver them unless he showed him an order o^ 
 the Council ; but the Captain could show him no 
 other but his commission to kill .and destroy the 
 enemy; but Mr. Hoare said, ' these were friends and 
 under order.' 
 
 " But the Captain would not be satisfied with his 
 answer, but commanded his corporal forthwith to 
 break open the door and take the Indians all 
 away, which was done accordingly ; and some of 
 the soldiers plundered the poor creatures of their 
 shirts, shoes, dishes, and such other things as they 
 could lay their hands upon, though the Captain com 
 manded the contrary. They were all brought to 
 Charlestown with a guard of twenty men. And the 
 Captain wrote a letter to the General Court, then 
 sitting, giving them an account of his action. 
 
 " This thing was very offensive to the Council, 
 that a private Captain should (without commission 
 or some express order) do an act so contradictory to 
 their former orders ; and the Governor and several 
 others spake of it at a conference with the deputies at 
 the General Court. . . . 
 
 " The Deputies seemed generally to agree to the 
 reason of the Magistrates in this matter ; yet notwith- 
 standing, the Captain (who appeared in the Court 
 shortly after upon another occasion), met with no 
 rebuke for this high irregularity and arbitrary action. 
 To conclude this matter, those poor Indians, about 
 fifty-eight of them of all sorts, were sent down to 
 Deer Island, there to pass into the furnace of aftliction 
 with their brethren and countrymen. But all their 
 corn and other provision sufficient to maintain them 
 for six months, was lost at Concord ; and all their 
 other necessaries, except what the soldiers had 
 jjlundered. And the poor Indians got very little or 
 nothing of what they lost, but it was squandered 
 away, lost by the removal of Mr. Hoare and other 
 means, so that they were necessitated to live upon 
 clams, as the others did, with some little corn provided 
 at the charge of the ' Honorable Corporation for the 
 Indians,' residing in London. Besides, Mr. Hoare lost 
 all his building and other cost, which he had provided 
 
 for the entertainment and employment of those In- 
 dians; which was considerable." This was in Febru- 
 ary, 1675-70. 
 
 In another place Gookin relates that fourteen 
 armed men of Chelmsford went to the Indian camp 
 at Wameset, near by, and called on them to come out 
 of their wigwams, whereupon they fired on the unsus- 
 pecting Indians, wounding five women and children 
 and killing outright the only son of John Tahatta- 
 wan, of Naahobah, a boy twelve years old, and wound- 
 ing his mother, Sarah or Kehonowsquaw, then a 
 widow, the daughter of Sagamore John, of Paw- 
 tucket. 
 
 She was then a widow for the second time, having 
 had as her second husband Oonamog, ruler of the 
 Praying Indians at Marlborough. 
 
 William Nahaton, or Tahattawan, a brother of 
 John Tahattawan, was among the Indians at Deer 
 Island, and was one of the six selected to serve as 
 guides under Major Savage, in March, 1675-76. 
 
 Tom Dublet, or Nepanet, was another of the Na- 
 shobah Indians who proved of great service to the 
 English in treating with the hostile Indians and re- 
 deeming prisoners. He it was who procured the re- 
 lease of Mrs. Rowlandson and others. 
 
 For one of these expeditions, which was successful 
 in ransoming prisoners, an order was passed by the 
 General Court awarding him two coats. 
 
 His wigwam was near the present residence of Mr. 
 Joel Proctor, and his favorite "hole" for fishing is 
 pointed out some distance down the brook. 
 
 There were white people living at this time in 
 the part of the present town of Littleton which we 
 designate as Nashoba, but which was not within the 
 Indian plantation, but was part of Concord Village, 
 so-called, and was sometimes designated as Powers' 
 Farm and Nashoba Farm. 
 
 The Reed house, the ruins of which are still to be 
 seen at the foot of Nashoba Hill, was built as a gar- 
 rison, probably about this time, for protection against 
 hostile Indians. 
 
 A family by the name of Shepard was living in 
 the vicinity during King Philip's War, and in Febru- 
 ary, 1675-70, Abraham and Isaac Sliepard, two broth- 
 ers, were killed by Indians as they were threshing in 
 their barn. They had set their sister Mary, a girl of 
 fifteen years, to watch on Quagana Hill, near by, but 
 the Indians stole up behind, captured her before she 
 could give an alarm and carried her away to Nasha- 
 way (Lancaster), where they encamped for the night. 
 While the Indians slept she escaped, mounted a 
 horse, swam the river, and rode home. 
 
 There may have been more of a village at Na- 
 shoba Farm than is now there. The ancient burying- 
 ground, which was on the Reed Farm, was ploughed 
 up several years since. Such desecration is shame- 
 ful ; but in the absence of records to show that it 
 was ever set aside for a public burying-place, and 
 never having been under the town's care, nobody felt 
 
4 
 
 •^ " 
 
 ri^_^: l^ojfu^Lh fiuMiuim faUctJ-:^ ,Jh :^ 
 
 - * 
 
 > ■s 
 
 f^r' : sy9jh,;{,c./i f>U4MiH^m iaidctj-:^ A 
 
 y 
 
 .^ 
 
 o 
 
 I. 
 
 d6 
 
 /^<. ^incijicHi to ft»^ 
 
 ^ 
 
 
LITTLETON. 
 
 authorised to take action after tfae desecration took 
 place ; the contemplation of which was known only 
 to the perpetrator, who claimed the land. 
 
 The tombstone^ were used in building a wall, and 
 some were taken a war as relics, bo that now. proba- 
 bly, no Testige remains of the last resting-jilace of 
 the earliest white settlers of this town. 
 
 East of where tie burying-gronnd is said to have 
 been may be seen a well-preserved dam, canal and mill- 
 <ile beside the brook which runs through the wciods. 
 
 Very few of the Xashobah Indians ever returned, 
 but when released from Deer Island went to other 
 places, the greater number to Natick. In the mean 
 time white people moved into the deserted plantation, 
 perhaps had done so to some extent before the In- 
 dians were removed, and settled there with no real 
 right, save that of possession ; for, though some bought 
 land of the Indians, the latter had been expressly 
 forbidden by the General Court to sell without its 
 sanction. 
 
 Lieutenant Joseph Wheeler, of Concord, by trad- 
 ing with the Xashobah Indiana while they still lived 
 on their plantation, became their creditor, and peti- 
 tioned the General Court in 1662 for a grant of two 
 hundred acres of land in the south part of Kashobah 
 in payment, but it was refused. 
 
 Pel eg Lawrence and Robert Robbine, of GLroton, 
 were probably the first purchasers of Kashobah land 
 from the Indians. A plan on file at the State-House, 
 made by Jonathan Danforth, surveyor, and bearing 
 date January 2, 1686-87, shows the Bobbins and Law- 
 rence tract as laid out in the northeast corner of the 
 plantation, one-half mile wide by about two mOee 
 long ; one side, the northerly, being just two miles, 
 and the southeriy a little longer. 
 
 It appears to have been supposed by these men 
 and Groton people that the purchase of the land from 
 the Indians brought it into Groton territory, and 
 when, in later years, it was found that the jurisdiction 
 over Xasliobah lands was in question, and that other 
 towns were preparing to annex it, Groton sought to 
 strengthen her claim by getting possession of the 
 Indian deeds. At a town-meeting in Groton, June 
 8, 1702, it was voted to give three acres of meadow 
 land and ten acres of upland each to Robert Bob- 
 bins aad to the heirs of Peleg Lawrence, on condition 
 that they give up their Indian titles to the town. 
 Groton people or others who desired to belong to 
 Groton also settled within the bounds of Xasbobah, 
 but outside of the Robbins and Lawrence pnrch.ase. 
 In the Middlesex County records I find that at 
 court held at Charlestown, June 20, 1682, the follow- 
 ing was entered : 
 
 "CaptuiD Tlioiuaf Heuctauan, Lt. Joe. Wheeler i Lt. Jnu. fljDl 
 surveyor, or any two of tb«m are uomlDHted A: imj»owered a comit- 
 tee to ruti tibe ancient bounds of ^kaebobaL Plantation, & remark tiie 
 lines, SB it wae returned to the general court bj eaid H'. fijnt, us tbe 
 cbarige of tbe ludianE, ^ivin^ notice to tbe flelectnten of Grottou of time 
 & place of Uioeting v>^ ie referred to Mi*, fi jut. to appynt, t to make re* 
 turn to next coun cotirt at Camt. in order to a final! Bettleaneut-*' ' 
 
 The Teuim is as ibllows : 
 
 '* We Trbose natnee are Trndenrritten being aj>|>oisted by re Honored 
 County Court Jtuae iOfib, lf>82. To run the Ancient Imunds of Saabo- 
 L<eT, bare accordingly run tbe said boundg, and liud tbat tbe Tovn of 
 Groton In- tbeire Second laying oni of tbeire bounds hare taken into 
 tbeire bounds ae ve judge neer balfe Indian Plantation. 
 
 "BerreraU of tbe Select men and otber inbabitante of Groton being 
 tbere witb os I*id see tbeeree error tberein t Do dedire tliat laying ont 
 St) far as Ibey bare Invaded tbe right of y Indians. 
 
 " Aiso we find y* tbe KurwesI Comer of KaBbobey is run into ye firel 
 bounds of Grolon to ye Quantily of 3o(' acres according as Groton men 
 did tbere Sbow us tbeire Said line wiiicb tbey Say was made before 
 Kasbubey wag laid out. and wbicb bounds tbey iKt CSiallenge as tbeire 
 Right. 
 
 ** The Indians alsf. bare Declared tbem Selves willing to forego that 
 Provided they may bare it made up upon tbt ire West Line. 
 
 ** And we Judge it may be there added to theile Conveniance. 
 
 •' 2 October lf*i 
 
 *■ Jc»S1:PH Wfi£EL£&, 
 "JOHS FUJIT. 
 
 *' Eihibitod in Court 4 approved 3 : 6 : c!2. 
 
 From a comparieon of Jonathan Danforth's plan 
 of ^Nashobah and the first plan of Groton, made by 
 the same surveyor in 16C8 and published by Dr. S. 
 A. Green in his '• Boundary Lines of Old Groton,'' 
 tvith a modem county map, it will be seen where the 
 ■ioO acres lay in which Xashobah and Groton over- 
 lapped each other. 
 
 The northwest corner of Xashobah was undoubt- 
 edly the same as the present northwest comer of 
 Littleton, on the side of Brown Hill in Pingreyvilie, 
 and very nearly a right angle. It was formed by 
 the present westerly line of the town and a line 
 whose general direction from the corner was easterly, 
 and is laid down on Danforth's plan of Nash- 
 obah as a straight line, although records slate 
 that it ran by blazed trees which were not in a 
 straight line. 
 
 Hie southeasterly line of Groton by Danforth's 
 I'lan of that town ran from Forge Pond to a point 
 uear the Lactate fJEictory, or between that and the 
 ■'Kewstate " railroad crossing; there it made an angle 
 of aboDt l-W and ran to a point at or near the pres- 
 ent westerly corner of Littleton and northerly corner 
 of Boxboro', from which point the Grolon line ran 
 Dorthwesterly to what is now Shirley Village. It 
 will be seen that the easterly end of C'ak Hill and 
 considerable land in the Pingreyvilie corner of the 
 town must thereforf have been included in the maps 
 made by Danforth of both Nashobah and Groton. 
 
 To which plantation this 350 or more acres right- 
 fully belonged is a question of great doubt. 
 
 The grant of the Indian plantation of Nashobah 
 was in 1654, and though no area nor bounds were 
 given, it was slated by Gookin in 1674 and by others 
 to be four miles square ; in reality it was only ihree 
 miles on ihe north side. 
 
 The original grant of Grroton was in 1655, and was 
 stated to be a tract eight miles square, but when first 
 laid out by Danforth in 1668 it was on the average 
 about seven miles wide by eleven long. 
 
 Groton neglected to | get Danforth's plan con- 
 
LITTLETON. 
 
 firmed by the General Court uulil alter Nasliubah 
 was incorporated for a second time as an English 
 town in 1714, and then the overlapped territory had 
 been confirmed to Nashobah. 
 
 In their report Messrs. Wheeler & Flint refer to a 
 second laying out of Groton, by which, no doubt, was 
 claimed the Robbins and Lawrence purchase and 
 more too, as the amount of land within Nashobah 
 claimed by Groton was stated in a legislative report 
 by Jonathan Tyng, Thomas How and John Stearns 
 in 1711 to be 7840 acres, and elsewhere that the line 
 extended beyond Beaver Brook. It does not appear 
 that Groton ever had any valid right to this tract, 
 but after it was taken beyond their reach by the in- 
 corporation of Nashobah in 1714, Groton men had 
 sufEcieut influence in the Legislature ro procure the 
 grant, mainly in lieu of it, of Groton Gore, so called — 
 a tract not then included in any town, but in what is 
 now Greenville, Mason, Brookline, Milford and Wil- 
 ton in New Hampshire. 
 
 The next purchase of land from the Indians, after 
 the Robbins and Lawrence tract, and the first one of 
 which the deed is recorded, was made June 15, 1686, 
 by Hon. Peter Bulkeley, of Concord, and Maj. 
 Thomas Henchman, of Chelmsford, who bought the 
 easterly half of the plantation for the sum of £70. 
 The Indian grantors were : 
 
 "Kehonowsquaw alias Sarah, the daughter and sole lieiress of Job u 
 Tahattawan, Sachem and late of Nashobah deceased ; Naanishcow, 
 alias .Tohn Thomas ; Naanasqtiaw alias Rebeckah, wife to the said 
 Naanishcow ; Naashkinomenet, alias Solomon, eldest son of s-i Naanish- 
 cow and Naanasquaw, sister to the aforesaid Tahattawan ; Weegram- 
 moniinet alias Thomas Waban ; Nackcominewock, relict of Crooked 
 Robin ; Wunnuhhew alias Sarah, wife to Neepanum alias Tom Dube 
 let." 
 
 The description of the land is as follows: 
 
 *'And it contains one moyety or halfe part of said Nashobah planta- 
 tion, & the easterly side of it ; It is bounded by Chelmsford plantation 
 (about three miles & three-iinartere) on the easterly side ; by Concord 
 village Land Southward, about two miles A three-i|uarters ; Northward 
 it is bounded by Laud sold by the aforesaid Indians to Robert Robbins 
 aud Peleg Lawrence, both of Groton Town, which land is part of the 
 aforesaid Nashobah plantation, & this Ijine is exactly two miles in 
 Length & runs East three degrees Northerly, or West three degrees 
 southerly, & the South end runs parallell with this Line : On the West- 
 erly side it is bounded by the remainder of eaiil Nashobah plantation ; 
 A that West Line runs (from two little maples marked with H for the 
 Northwest corner) it runs South seven degrees & thirty minutes east, 
 four miles & one-quarter ; the most Southerly corner is bounded by a 
 little red oak marked H, the north east corner is a stake standing about 
 four or five pole southward of a very great Rock that Lyeth iu the line 
 between said Nashobah & Chelmsford plautatiou.'^ 
 
 The great rock is no doubt the one in the orchard 
 on the farm of the late Barnabas Dodge, a short dis- 
 tance south of the road, and that is now in the line be- 
 tween Littleton and Westford. 
 
 I am forced to the conclusion that Jonathan Dan- 
 forth, whose plan of 1686 appears to have been made 
 for the purpose of locating the Bulkeley and Hench- 
 man purchase, made his plan more in the interest of 
 his clients than of accuracy, and suspect that he did 
 not measure the north line of the plantation at all, 
 but assumed that it was four miles long and so meas- 
 
 ured oil' two miles for Bulkeley and Henchman, aud 
 ran his other lines accordingly. My reasons for this 
 belief are that the distance from the great rock men- 
 tioned to the northwest corner of Littleton on the 
 side of Brown Hill, which all authorities agree is the 
 original northwest corner of Nashobah, is only about 
 three miles, and when it came to be surveyed under 
 the direction of a legislative committee in 1711, the 
 north line of the plantation is reported as three 
 miles. 
 
 If the reader will look at a map of Littleton and 
 note the following points, he will have the four cor- 
 ners of the ancient Indian plantation Nashobah: the 
 northwest corner of Littleton on the side of Brown 
 Hill, near the road to Ayer, was one corner ; a point 
 near the centre of Boxboro', found by prolonging the 
 present west and south lines of Littleton until they 
 meet, was another corner; the westerly end of Nagog 
 pond was a third corner, and a point on the Westford 
 line, between the Dodge place and Forge Pond, was 
 the fourth corner. It was uniformly spoken of as 
 four miles square, but was not exactly that, being, as 
 we have seen, only three miles on one side, and hav- 
 ing corners which varied slightly from right angles. 
 
 The purchases of Robbins, Lawrence, Bulkeley and 
 Henchman left in the hands of the Indians only that 
 portion of the plantation which Danforth in his plan 
 designates as " Nashobalh the Indian part," being the 
 westerly portion, four miles long on the west line 
 two miles theoretically on the north line, but actually 
 only about one, and 412 poles on the south line. 
 
 Deeds from the Indians covering this portion are 
 on record at Cambridge as follows : Under date of 
 May 9, 1694, from Thomas Waban, of Natick, to 
 Walter Powers, of Concord, in consideration of fif- 
 teen pounds, and other things — 
 
 " A certain Tract of Land upland, Swamp, Meadow & Meadow Laud, 
 Containing one Quarter part of an Indian Plantation known by ye 
 name of Nashoby within their Majesties Province of ye Massachusetts 
 Bay. The easterly half of s** Plautatiou being formerly bought of ye 
 Indians by JIajor Hinchman and ye Westerly Quarter part of ye Plau- 
 tatiou is yet in Possession of ye Indians being Challenged by John 
 Thomas Indian and this Quarter part of the plantation by one now sold 
 as above lies between ye s^ halfe that Major Hinchman bought of ye 
 Indians and ye other Quarter part yt said Indian .lohu Thomas claims 
 from End to End both upland and Meadow, ye Souther End bound.s upon 
 Pompasittaquitt, or ye Town Ship of Stow, and ye Noitberly End runs 
 [to] Groton Line," 
 
 And under date of May 10, 170], from 
 
 " .Solomon Thomas & .lohn Thomas jr., both of Natick, tcTosiah Whit- 
 comb of Lancaster," *' a certain parcell or Tract of Land lying and be- 
 ing in a place t'ommouly Called and known by the name of Mcshouah 
 [Nashobah] and is a (^tarter part of a Tract of Land four miles square. 
 It being four mile in Length and one mile in breadith be it more or less 
 as it is bounded with Stow Land on the South and West and Wilderness 
 Land on tlie North and the Land of Walter Powers on the East, aud all 
 that is therein and thereupon, and all rights, privileges, easements and 
 appurtenances belonging to the thereby granted premises.'' 
 
 Solomon Thomas and John Thomas, Jr., were sons 
 of John Thomas, and it is fair to assume that he had 
 transferred his interest in this tract to them, as he 
 was still living at the time. 
 

 
 
 "i-"tifv farpiiHi"'' t^ '%;_ 
 
 PLAN OF NASHOBAH PLANTATION, 
 
 With black lines to indicate the changes afterwards made in 
 Littleton town bounds previous to iSyo. 
 
 1st Change, A D. 1725. Nashoba Farm added from Concord. 
 
 (See top o£ plan.) 
 2d Change, A. D 1738-9. Estates of Peleg Lawrence and others 
 
 added from Groton. (.See left hand side of plan.) 
 
 3d Change, A. D. 17S3. Territory set off to form District of 
 Bo.vborough (See right hand lower corner of plan ) 
 
il:-7 
 
 
 ife 
 
 2 
 
 I?' . ' • 
 
 2 
 
 tr 
 
 O 
 
 
 o 
 
 
 h 
 
LITTLETON. 
 
 A confirmatory deed of the Bulkeley and Hench- 
 man purchase was given in 1714 by Thomas Waban, 
 John Thomas and John Thomas, Jr., to Major 
 Henchman and the heira of Peter Bulkeley, and states 
 that the consideration was passed twenty-eight years 
 before. 
 
 This deed, old and yellow, but still legible, bearing 
 the signature of Waban, and the marks of the other 
 two, is still in existence, and in the possession of the 
 writer, to whom it was presented by his father, Hon. 
 Joseph A. Harwood. It is an extremely interesting 
 document, and was formerly owned by Mr. Samuel 
 Gardner Drake, author of " Drake's Book of Indians," 
 from whose hands it pa.ssed through one other only to 
 Mr. Harwood. 
 
 What disposition to make of Nashobah seems to 
 have been a troublesome question for the General 
 Court to decide, and the conflicting interests which 
 sought po.ssession of the very desirable farming lands 
 there lying idle were powerful enough to keep the 
 question in suspense for many years. 
 
 It appears to have been a contest between Major 
 Henchman and others, who had bought of the Indians 
 and wished to colonize the place and form a town, on 
 one side, and the neighboring municipalities, which 
 wished to annex the territory, on the other. In the 
 end the colonization interest wqp. 
 
 Reference is made to a petition from Concord people, 
 who desired a grant of the land for settling on it, but 
 it was stated not to have been pressed, owing to the 
 " publick troubles that hath happened," referring no 
 doubt to the troubles in England at the time of the 
 accession of William and Mary; but in 1698 it was 
 renewed by a petition signed by twenty-one Concord 
 men and seventeen Chelmsford men, stating: "And 
 your petitioners, for themselves or children, stand in 
 need of an iclargme"' & accommodations (who, if not 
 accommodated neer home, must be necessitated to re- 
 move out of the Province), having also obtained the 
 Indian Title of ye one-halfe of ye sd Tract, of ye Ad- 
 ministrators of ye estate of Peter Bulkeley, Esq., de- 
 ceased, and of Major Thomas Hinchman, ... In 
 order to the setting up of an English plantation." 
 
 Major Henchman endorsed the document to the 
 effect that the petitioners had purchased the title to 
 half the tract. 
 
 The matter was put in the hands of a committee to 
 report to the next session, which again put it off in 
 the same manner, and it seems to have come to noth- 
 ing for several years after. The signatures, however, 
 to the petition include many Littleton names, from 
 which it is fair to assume that this was in a measure 
 the party which was finally successful in getting the 
 grant. I give the names in full: 
 
 Concord. — JoBepIi EstabrooU, Thomas Dackin, John Wheeler, Jno. 
 Jones, Eliphelet Fox, Sjinon Davis, Sen'., Thomas Browne, Sen'., Sam" 
 How, Samuel Prescott, Jn. Sleriam, Samuel Hartwell, Nath" Harwood, 
 Moses Wheatt, Roger Chandler, Walter Power, Sen., Wm. Wilson, 
 Samuel Jones, Jno. Hore, Jno. Wood, George Robins. 
 
 Chelmsfohd.— Jno. Hartwell, Sen'., Jno. Hold, Sam". Stratton, Jona- 
 
 than Prescott, Jun'., Jacob Taylor, The. Wheller, James Snedly, Thomas 
 Clark, Joseph Farwell, Edward Emerson, Joseph Adams, Jno. Kidder, 
 Steven Pierce, Abraham Parker, John Perram, Moses Parker, Elezar 
 Brown. 
 
 As has been stated before, Groton attempted to 
 annex a large part of Nashobah, but was not success- 
 ful. Stow also made an attempt to get the whole, and 
 in 1702 petitioned the General Court, reciting the 
 facts that Nashobah, a tract of land four miles square, 
 was deserted by the Indian proprietors, who wished to 
 sell ; that certain English claimed it by purchase, and 
 that Groton had of late extended their town bounds 
 to take in a large part, especially of meadow, but that 
 Stow, being small, stood in the greatest need of it, and 
 praying for leave to purchase and join the land to 
 Stow. The petition was granted on the part of the 
 House, but negatived in the Council. 
 
 This left the matter still open, and people continued 
 to settle in Nashobah, some by right of purchase and 
 others without right. Of course they had no town 
 government, though no doubt most of them associated 
 themselves with the neighboring towns, where they 
 attended church and paid minister's rates, and per- 
 haps other taxes, as towns were allowed to tax out- 
 lying settlers not in other towns. 
 
 Jonathan Whitcomb, nephew of Josiah Whit- 
 comb, who purchased of the Indians, settled where his 
 descendant, Jonathan Hartwell Whitcomb, now lives, 
 the farm having been handed down in the family ever 
 since, and as he was a shoemaker, or " cordwainer'" 
 and kept accounts with his neighbors as early as 1708, 
 I have been able to gather from them the names of 
 many of the first settlers. Among them are the 
 names of Robbins, Lawrence, Parker, Willard, Farns- 
 worth, Pearce, Powers, Wheeler, Wetherbee, Stone, 
 Davis, Whitney, Jewett, Woods, Gilson, and many 
 others not now familiar. The next move for a grant 
 of Nashobah, of which I find record, was in 1711, 
 when twenty-three, who styled themselves " Inhabit- 
 ants of Concord, Chelmsford, Lancaster & Stow, &c.," 
 petitioned for a grant of Nashobah, " In a regular 
 manner to settle a township," reciting that sundry 
 persons had made entry upon the land without appli- 
 cation to the government, and that others were in- 
 tending to do the same. 
 
 The petitioners were : 
 
 Gershom Procter, Sam" Procter, John Procter, Joseph Fletcher, John 
 Miles, John Parlin, Robert Robins, John Darby, John Barker, Sam 
 Stratton, Hezekiah Fletcher, Josiah Whitcomb, John Buttrick, Will" 
 Powers, Jonathan Hubburd, W^. Keen, John Heald, John Bateman, 
 .lohu Heywood, Thomas Wheeler, Sam" Hartwell, jun'., Sam" Jones, 
 John JMirium. 
 
 Acting thereon the General Court, on June 7, 1711, 
 
 "Ordered that Jo«. Tyng, Esq'., Thom". Howe, Esq'., & Mr. John 
 Sternes, be a Committee to view the Land mentioned in the Petition, & 
 Represent the Lines or Bounds of the Severall adjacent Towns bounding 
 on the 8"^ Lands, and to have Speciall Regard to the Land granted to 
 the Indians, & to make report of the quantity & Circumstances thereof" 
 
 The report of this committee gives the best descrip- 
 tion to be found of the plantation, and the state of 
 things at that time, and I therefore copy it in full : 
 
LITTLETON. 
 
 "The report of the Comitty of the Hon*>ie Court upon the petition of 
 Coucord, CheliiiBford, LancastPr A St«w, for a griiiit of Part of Nnshobe 
 lands. 
 
 "Purenantto the directions given I>y this Hon'''" Court bareing Date 
 the ^O"" of May, 1711, The Comity Reports n» followeth that is to Say, 
 Ace. 
 
 '* That on the second day of October, 1711, the b'> comitty went upon 
 the premises with an Artis and veved (viewed) and gervaied the I<and 
 mentioned in the Peticon, and find that the most Southerly line of the 
 plantation of Nashobe is hounded partly on Coucord & partly on Stow, 
 and this line contaiub by Estimation upon the Bervey a bought three 
 miles and 50 polle. The Westerly line Runs partly on Stow & partly on 
 land claimed by Groton and coutaines four miles and 20 poll, extending 
 to aplacecalled Brown hill. The North line Runs a long curt^iin lands 
 claimed by Groton and contains three miles, the Easterle line Runs 
 partly on Chelnisfiord, and partly on a farm cald Poworsis farm, in Con- 
 cord ; this line contains a bought fouer miles and twenty-five pole. 
 
 " The lands a boue mentioned wer shewed to vs for Nafthobe Planta- 
 tiou, and there were ancient marks in the Seuerall lines fairly marked, 
 AndS* comitefind vpon the Servey, that Groton hath Run into Nashobe 
 (as it was Showed to vs), So as to to take out nere one-half S"* plantation 
 and the bigest part of the medows, it appears to vs to Agree well with the 
 report of Mr. John Flint & M'. Joseph Wheeler, who were a Commetly 
 imployed by the County Court in midlesexs, to Run the bounds of said 
 plantation. (June y« 20th, '82), The plat will demoustrate how the 
 plantation lyeth & how Groton corns in vpon it, as aleso the qnaintete 
 which is a bought 7840 acres. 
 
 "And said Comiteare of the opinion that ther may fbe] a township in 
 that place, it lying So remote from mo.st of the neighboreng Towns, 
 provided this Court Shall So reson to continew the bounds as we do judg 
 thay have been maid at the first laieng out, And that ther be sum addi- 
 tion from Concord & Chelmsford which we are redy to think will be 
 complyd with by S"* Towns, And S-' Comite do find a bought 15 famelys 
 Settled in S^ plantation of Nashobe, (5) in Groton claimed, and ten in 
 the remainder, and 3 famelys which are already settled on the powerses 
 farm were convenient to joyn w s^ plantation and are a bought Eaight 
 mille to any meting-house. (Also ther are a bought Eaight famelys in 
 Chelmsford which are allredy setled neer Nashobe line & six or Seven 
 miles from their own meeting-house. 
 
 "Jonathan Tynr, 
 "Thomas How, 
 "John Stearns. 
 
 "In the House of Representatives Nov™. 2, 1711, Read. 
 
 "Octo. 23, 1713. In Council Read and accepted; And the Indian 
 native Proprietors of the S-^ Plantacf", Being removed by death Except 
 two or Three families only remaining, Its Declared and Derec ted That 
 the said Lands of Nashoba be preserved for a Township. 
 
 " And Whereas it appears That Grotoo, Concord and Stow by Several 
 of their Inhabitants have Eucroaclied and Setled upon the Said Lands ; 
 This Court sees not reason to remove them to their Damage, but will 
 allow them to be and remain with other Inhabitants that may be ad- 
 mitted into the Town tobe there eetled ; And that they have full Lib- 
 erty when their Names and Number are determined to purchase of the 
 few Indians there remaining, for the Establishment of a Township ac- 
 cordingly. 
 
 *' Saving convenient Allotments and portions of Land to the remain- 
 ing Indian Inhabitants for their Selling and Planting. 
 
 " Is". Addington, Secnj. 
 
 " In the House of Representatives, Octo'. 23ti», 1713. Read." 
 
 It will be noticed that this report was not acted on 
 by the Council for nearly two years after it was made 
 and acted on in the House. 
 
 By this action the General Court decided that 
 Nashobah should be a town for English people, and 
 for the first time committed itself on the question. 
 
 The act of incorporation followed about a year 
 later, that is, on November 2, 1714, under which date 
 the following entry is found in the General Court 
 Records : 
 
 ** The following Order Paas^ by the Represent"", Read & Concur'd, 
 Tiz. : Upon Consideration of the numy Petitions & Claims relating to 
 the Land called Nashoba Land ; Ordered that the said Nashoba L«nd 
 bo made a Township, with the Addition of such adjoining Lauds of ll.o 
 
 Neighbouring Towns, whose Owners ehall petition for that end, & thai 
 this Court should think fit to grant. That the said Nashoba Lands 
 having been long since purchased of the Indians by M'. Bulkley & 
 Henchman, one-Half, the other Half by Whetcomb X- Powers, That 
 the Said purchase be confirmed to the children of the said Bulkley, 
 Whetcomb A Powers, & Cpt. Robert Meers as Assignee to RI'. Hench- 
 man according to their respective Proportions ; Reserving to the Inhab- 
 itants, who have settled within these Bounds, their Settlements with 
 Divisions of Lands, in proportion to the Grantees, & such as Shall be 
 hereafter admitted ; tlie said Occupants or Present Inhabitants paying 
 in Proportion, as others shall pay for their Allotments ; Provided the 
 said Plantation shall be settled with Thirty-five Families .^' an orthodox 
 Minister in three years time. Aud that Five hundred Acres of Land be 
 reserved and laid out for the Benefit of any of the Descendants of the 
 Indian Proprietors of the Said Plantation, that may be surviving ; 
 A Proportion thereof to be for Sarah Doublet alias Sarah Indian. The 
 Rev. M'. John Leverett & Spencer Phipa, Esq"", to be Trustees for the 
 Said Indians tu take Care of the Said Lands for their Use. 
 
 •* Audit is further Ordered that Cpt. Hopeatill Brown, M'. Timothy 
 Wily & Mr. Joseph Buruap, of Reading, be a Committee to lay out the 
 said Five hundred Acres of Land reserved for the Indians & to run the ' 
 Line between Groton &. Nashoba, at the Charge of both Parties, A make 
 Report to this Court ; And that however the Line mav divide the Land 
 with regard to the Township, yet the Proprietors on either side may be 
 continued in the Possession of their Improvements, paying as aforesaid ; 
 A nd that no Persons legal Bight or Property in the Said Lands sbnll [be] 
 hereby taken away or infringed. 
 
 " Consented to .1. Di'pi.f.y." 
 
 From this act of November 2, 1714, we date the 
 present town, afterwards, as we shall see, named Lit- 
 tleton. 
 
 The report of the committee finally establishing the 
 bounds and laying out the Indian reservation was as 
 follows : 
 
 " The following Report of the Committee for Running the Line be- 
 tween Groton & Nashoba Accepted by Represent'f". Read and Con- 
 cur'd ; viz. 
 
 " We the subscribei-s appointed a Committee by the General Court to 
 run the Line between Groton & Nashoba & to lay out Five hundred 
 Acres of Land in said Nashoba to the [sic] Descendants of the Indians ; 
 Pursuaut to said Order of Court, bearing date Octob' 20th [the open- 
 ing of the session] 1714. AVe the Subscribers.retum as follows: That on 
 the SO'** of November last, we met on the premises, & heard the Informa- 
 tion of the Inhabitants of Groton, Nashoba & othere of the Neighbour- 
 ing Towns, referring to the Line that has been between Groton A Nash- 
 oba &, seen several Records, out of Groton Book, & considered other 
 Writings, that belong to Groton and Nashoba. & We have considered all 
 and We have run the Line (Which we account is the old Line between 
 Groton & Nashoba ;) We begau next Chelmsford Line, at a Heap of 
 Stones, where, we were informed, that there had been a great Pine Tree, 
 the Northeast Corner of Nashoba, and run Westerly by many old mark- 
 ed Trees to a Pine Tree standing on the Southerly End of Brown Hill 
 mark'd N and those marked Trees had been many times marked or re- 
 newed, tho they do not stand in a direct or stniit Line to said Pine 
 Tree on said Brown Hill ; And then from said Brown Hill we turned a 
 little to the East of the South, & run to a White Oak being an old Mark, 
 and 60 from said Oak to a Pitch Pine by a. Meadow, being an other old 
 Mark ; & the same Line extended to white oak near the North East Cor- 
 nerof Stow ; Aud this is all, as we were informed, that Groton & Nasho- 
 ba joins together ; Notwithstanding the Connnittees Opinion is, that 
 Groton Men be continued in their honest Rights, tho they fall within 
 the Bounds of Nashoba ; And we have laid out to the Descendants of 
 the Indians Five hundred Acres at the South East Corner of the Planta- 
 tion of Nashoba ; East side. Three hundred Poles long. West side three 
 hundred Poles, South & North ends, Two hundred aud eighty Poles 
 broad; A large white Oak marked at the North west Corner, ami many 
 Live Trees we marked at the West Side A North End, A it takes in Part 
 of two Ponds. 
 
 "Dated Decern' 14, 1714. 
 
 ** HoI'Ksth.i, Brown 
 •'Timothy Wily 
 ** Joseph BrnsAP 
 
atn^ 
 
 Z^ ^-i^«. 
 
LITTLETON. 
 
 The two ponds referred to in the part laid out for 
 the Indians were Fort Pond and Nagog Potid. 
 
 The town having been duly incorporated, we find, 
 as in all the old towns, two record books started, the 
 Proprietors' Record-Book and the Town Records. 
 
 The proprietors continued their meetings and 
 records until the last of the common lands were di- 
 vided in the part of the town known as "New State 
 Woods," or more properly New Estate, a name I sup- 
 pose applied about the time of the division of it inlo 
 individual holdings. The last entry in the Proprie- 
 tors' Record-Book was in 1755. The first entry begins 
 by reciting the act of the Legislature of November 2, 
 1714, then follows 
 
 " No (2) 
 "To all Cbristiaa People before whome these presents shall Come 
 Greeting Know yee yt we whose names are underwritten having obtain- 
 ed ^« General Courts grant of a certain tract or parcel of Land comonly 
 C!ild Nashoba which was long since purcliased of ye Indian Proprietors 
 of 8** Land, by our selves & predisessors as may appear by our several 
 Deeds. Do by these presenta mutualy agree to throw all in Comon for 
 yo good of ye Town, & so to draw our several proportions according to 
 our several intrests & former agreements — & y* we do further agree to 
 admit as associates according to former agreements, Paul Dudley Esq', 
 Addington Davenport Esq' & Mr John White all of Boston— & also to 
 reserve two nr three Lots where it is most convenient for y« ministry 
 Scoole or such other Public uses as may be thought Propper to be at y« 
 disposition of ye major part of ye Propriety also to bare our proportion 
 of all y« Charge y' hath or may arise on ye premises. 
 
 *' To y« confirmation of which we find & obliege our selves our heirs 
 executors and Administrators firmly by these presents in witness where- 
 of we have bereinto set our hands and scales this 15'^" of Decem' 1714. 
 Note that y^ lands cald Powerses farm is not by this instrument in- 
 cluded 
 
 "Addington Davenpo-t,* Jn* White,* Joseph Bulkely,* Robert Bob- 
 bins,* Marah Wheeler,* Increas Powers,* Jon» Prescott,* John Han- 
 cock,* Daniel Powers,* Robert Mears,* Isaac Powers,* Tho" Powers, 
 Walter Powers,* JosiaU Whitcomb,* Will" Powers,* John Bulkeley,* 
 Paul Dudley,* Eliezer Lawrence.* 
 
 ** Signed & scald in presence of us 
 
 " DanI. Lawrknce 
 " Sasii. Long." 
 
 The admission as associates of Paul Dudley, Ad- 
 dington Davenport and John White, "according to 
 former agreements " shows that influence was requir- 
 ed to get the measure through the Legislature. 
 
 A curious error seems to have been made in the 
 act of incorporation which made the following action 
 necessary, under date of 
 
 *' Saturday, Dec. 3, 1715. 
 
 *' Upon Reading the Petition of Josiab Whitcomb of Lancaster, im- 
 porting 
 
 *' That whereas tho Great and General Court or assembly at the Ses- 
 sion in Oct' 1714, in consideration that the Land called Nashoba Land 
 then ordered to be made a Townsh p was purchased of the Indians, one 
 Half by M' Bulkley & M' Henchman, & the other half by Whitcomb 
 (the Petitioner, who was supposed to be dead as he is informed) and 
 that one Powers did Order that the said Purchase be confirmed to the 
 Children of the said Bulkley Whitcomb & Powers & to Capt. Robert 
 Mears assignee of M' Henchman according to their respective Propor- 
 tions, us by the copy of the Order of Confirmation of the General 
 Court will more fully appear Humbly Praying that the General Court 
 will please t< revoke the Confirmation or Grant made to his Children & 
 confirm to him his fourth part of the sjiid Land, that ho may enjoy what 
 he honestly purchas'd & that he may have Liberty to make Disposition 
 thereof according to his own Will & Pleasure. 
 
 "In Council, Read & Consented that the Prayer of the within Peti- 
 tion be granted, .\nd Ordered that the name of the Township he hence- 
 
 forth called Littleton. In the House of Representatives Read & Con- 
 curd. 
 
 "Consented to W" Tailer." 
 
 The date December 3, 1715, has been erroneously 
 used for the date of the incorporation of the town, 
 but the reader can see for himself that the former 
 act of November 2, 1714, is the correct date, and that 
 the new town bore the name Nashoba for one year. 
 
 It is said that the name Littleton was given as a 
 compliment to Hon. George Lyttleton, M.P., one of 
 the commissioners of the treasury, and that in ac- 
 knowledgment he sent from England a church-bell 
 as a present to the town ; but on account of the error 
 in spelling by substituting " i " for " y," the present 
 was withheld by the person having it in charge, who 
 gave the excuse that no such town as Lyttleton could 
 be found, and sold the bell. 
 
 The first recorded town-meeting was held March 
 13, 1715-16. 
 
 The record begins somewhat abruptly, and it is by 
 no means certain that the record-book, which is quite 
 loose in the covers from age, has not lost a few pages 
 bearing previous records. Isaac Powers was modera- 
 tor, Samuel Dudley was chosen town clerk and first 
 selectman, and the other selectmen were John Per- 
 rum, John Cobleigh, Moses Whitney and William 
 Powers. The other town oflBcers were : Samuel 
 Corry, constable ; Samuel Barret, tythingman ; Tho- 
 mas Power and John Wheeler, surveyors of highways; 
 Ebenezer Robbins and Jacob Powers, hog constables ; 
 John Barrett and Thos. Farr, fence-viewers, and Isaac 
 Powers, sealer of weights and measures and treasurer. 
 Of these men, Isaac Powers lived first in the sec- 
 tion of the town we call Nashoba, and afterwards in 
 the Centre, where George Whitcomb now lives. 
 Samuel Dudley lived beside the mill-pond, on land 
 now owned by John A. Kimball and used by him for 
 a pasture. A magnificent elm having a peculiar long 
 horizontal limb a short distance above the ground, 
 stands by the Dudley cellar-hole. He probably own- 
 ed land extending from there to Fort Pond. 
 
 Moses Whitney lived where Frank Ford now lives, 
 in the south part of the town. John Perrum or Per- 
 ham lived probably in the southeast part of the town. 
 Wm. Powers lived in Pingreyville; Jacob Powers 
 lived at the Old Common. 
 
 One of the first things for the new town to do was 
 to procure and settle a minister, and a town-meeting 
 was held April 17th in regard to the matter, at which 
 time it appears that Rev. Benjamin Shattuck was a 
 candidate. A committee consisting of John Cob- 
 leigh, John Perham and Eleazer Lawrence were 
 chosen to confer with the ministers of the neighbor- 
 ing townes, the Reverend Messrs. Eveleth, Stoddard, 
 Trowbridge and Whitney, and get their advice in 
 regard to Mr. Shattuck. 
 
 Their report is not recorded, but on May 9th, at a 
 meeting called for the purpose, Mr. Shattuck was 
 chosen minister, and the sum of £70 was appropriat- 
 
10 
 
 LITTLETON. 
 
 ed towards his settlement to be "added to his lot." 
 His salary was fixed at £55, to advance 20 shillings a 
 year until it amount to £70 a year. 
 
 Rev. Benj. Shattuck accordingly took up his resi- 
 dence as the first rainisterof the town and completely 
 identified himself with it. He had several daughters 
 who married in town, and the Hartwell, Tuttle and 
 Tayior families all trace their ancestry back to him. 
 Mr. Shattuck was born in Watertown, July 30, 1()78, 
 graduated at Harvard college in 1709, and for the fol- 
 lowing six years was teacher of the grammar and 
 English school in Watertown, at the same time study- 
 ing for the ministry. He was ordained at Littleton, on 
 Christmas day, 1717, and continued as the minister of 
 the town until August 24, 1730, when it was agreed by 
 mutual consent that a council be called for his dis- 
 mission. He continued to live in town, however, 
 until his death, in 1763. 
 
 His residence was the house now owned by Mrs. 
 Eliza Hartwell. 
 
 The first meeting-house was located on the Com- 
 mon, in front of John B. Robinson's present resi- 
 dence, where it was located to accommodate people 
 from the borders of Chelmsford and Concord, who 
 helped bear the cost of the building, and attended 
 church here, and who, it was hoped, would be set off 
 lo this town by the General Court, which was peti- 
 tioned to that effect for several years in succession, 
 the people in question and Littleton citizens joining 
 in the petition. There were six families from 
 Chelmsford, and Walter Powers, John Powers, Da- 
 vid Russell and John Mtrriam, of Concord, living on 
 Nashoba Farm, who were for several years freed from 
 their minister's rates in those towns, and allowed to 
 pay in Littleton, and I find that at several of our 
 early town-meetings, at which the town acted in 
 its parochial capacity, a vote was passed allowing 
 Concord, Chelmsford and Groton men to vote in 
 the meeting, and at one time two Concord and 
 Chelmsford men were chosen assessors to assist in 
 making the rates. 
 
 ■ Finally, in 1725, the General Court granted the 
 petition for annexation so far as related to Concord 
 families, and a large tract of land extending from 
 Nagog Pond nearly or quite to the Old Common, was 
 added to the town, enlarging the bounds in that 
 direction, probably to their present position. 
 
 Mention is made of the meeting-house as early as 
 1717, and it was probably in an unfinished condition 
 at the time of Rev. Mr. Shattuck's ordination, but 
 was not completed until 1723. 
 
 It had entrances on three sides, after the custom of 
 those days, with probably square pews all around the 
 walls at least. No jrieution is made of bell, steeple 
 nor gallery, and I am of the opinion it had neither. 
 
 The building committee appear to have taken mat- 
 ters rather leisurely, and tjie following vote wais pabsed 
 August 26, 1723 : 
 
 *' To acGe^Jit tliw A»njL(in^-)j.om!e t^p co.udi^iofl thiit previous coii)[uULc£ 
 
 finish seats iiiid cinpbord what is wanting as soon as possible, this f>i]l 
 
 & the ceiiling [sic] by next full, or make allowance of to hare it 
 
 done. Couiliiittee to be acquitted when worit done." 
 
 It looks as if the committee did the work them- 
 selves; 
 
 The meeling-house being finished, the great ques- 
 tion was how to apportion the seats in a manner satis- 
 factory to all. 
 
 It was decided in assigning the family pews, first, 
 to have respect to age, and then the one having the 
 highest income to have choice and so on. A com- 
 mittee having the matter in charge made a report 
 which is recorded in full, giving location of the seals 
 assigned to various persons as follows : Eleazer Law- 
 rence, the pew on the left of the west door; Walter 
 Powers, second pew from the pulpit, that is, as I un- 
 derstand it, at the side of the pulpit, and probably to 
 the east ; Joshua Fletiher, on the right of the east 
 door; Major Prescott, the pew next Mr. Shattuck's, 
 that is, probably on the west side, the minister's 
 being next to the pulpit; Samuel Dudley, the pew on 
 the east of the pulpit ; Joseph Baker, the northeast 
 corner pew ; Isaac Powers, the pew at the right of 
 south door ; Moses Whitney, the pew at the left of 
 south door; Robert Robbins, the pew at the right of 
 Isaac Powers', which was given up to Robert Rob- 
 bins by Thomas Powers, who took Robbins' seat, the 
 "fore seat below," that is, front seat in the main 
 body ; John Perham, the pew at the right of west 
 door; Samuel Hunt, the northwest corner pew; John 
 Wheeler, the pew at the left of Moses Whitney's ; 
 Deacon Caleb Taylor, the pew at the left of the east 
 door. 
 
 For years the seating of the meeting-house, that is, 
 of those not having family pews, seems to have been 
 a troublesome duty, which had to be done annually, 
 and it was no uncommon thing to have the first at- 
 tempt of the committee rejected. The women sat on 
 one side of the house and the men on the other. la 
 1760 the rear seats were assigned to negroes by vote 
 of the town. 
 
 An incident occurred in 1720 which made quite a 
 sensation in town at the time. It was no less than a 
 witchcraft accusation which might have proved still 
 more sensational had it not been for the death of the 
 person accused. 
 
 Joseph Blanchard, who lived on or near Mr. Elbridge 
 Marshall's place, had at that time three young daugh- 
 ters — Elizabeth, aged about eleven, Joanna, about 
 nine and Mary, about five or six years. These children, 
 first the eldest, then the next, and finally the young- 
 est, began to act in a very strange and unaccountable 
 way. Elizabeth began by telling very strange stories 
 of things happening at the time, or supposed to, and 
 of strange dreams ; she would also swoon into a 
 trance and appear dead ; she performed sleight-of- 
 hand tricks and told fortunes; she would be found 
 in strange places, such as in the top of a tree, or in a 
 pond of water, asserting she flew to the tree or was 
 
p] 
 w 
 
 5 
 
 :. Z 
 
 ~ O 
 
 ?. ^ 
 
 ? O 
 
 g "^ 
 
 ■'=■ O 
 = z 
 
 O 
 
 s. '^ 
 
LITTLETON. 
 
 11 
 
 forced into the water, and in danger of drowning, at 
 which she would cry out in distsess. She also com- 
 plained of pinches and prickings of the flesh, and 
 showed wounds, and rents in her clothes, asserting 
 she was bewitched, and accused j\[rs. Dudley, wife of 
 Samuel Dudley, town clerk, of bewitching her- 
 When put to tlie test of reading Scripture she would 
 read, but fall down apparently lifeless wlien she 
 came to the words "God," "Christ," or "Holy 
 Ghost." She would bite people, excepting Rev. Mr. 
 Shattuck, whom she appeared to have no power to 
 hurt. 
 
 About four months after Elizabeth began to act in 
 this way, Joanna also began to do the same things, 
 and once was found on the top of the barn, a place 
 apparently impossible for her to reach by her own 
 exertions, and whither she said she was carried up 
 through the air. About two months later Mary be- 
 gan the same actions. 
 
 Elizabeth would often cry out, "There she is! 
 there's Mrs. Dudley!" when Mrs. Dudley was no- 
 where visible. Once she told her mother there was 
 a little bird in a certain part of the room ; her mother 
 having something in her hand, struck at the place, at 
 which Elizabeth cried out, " Oh, mother, you have 
 hit it on the side of the Iiead." It was afterwards 
 found that Mrs. Dudley was at the same time hurt 
 on one side of her face. Another time Elizabeth 
 said to her mother, "There's Mrs. Dudley; she is 
 just there; coming to afflict me!" Her mother 
 struck the place with something and Elizabeth cried 
 out, " You have hit her on the bowels." 
 
 It was found that Mrs. Dudley, at the same time, 
 felt a pain, took to her bed and died in a few weeks. 
 
 On the face of this story it appears very mysteri- 
 ous and inexplicable by natural causes. Blanchard 
 and his wife believed the children sincere and guile- 
 less, and though some wiser ones including, it is 
 thought, Mr. Shattuck, advised separating the chil- 
 dren by taking one or more to their homes, the parents 
 would not consent to it, and the majority believed 
 them bewitched. A few days after the death of Mrs. 
 Dudley the strange actions of the two older children 
 ceased. 
 
 It proved however, that Mrs. Dudley's death was 
 perfectly accountable; she was in a delicate condition, 
 and on riding horseback behind her husband at a 
 rapid rate felt something break within her. 
 
 Though the children for a long time persisted that 
 their stories had been true, and Elizabeth did not 
 weaken, even when, requesting baptism, she was 
 questioned by Mr. Shattuck about the circumstances, 
 and told that some of her neighbors suspected her of 
 falsehood ; yet eight years after the girls confessed to 
 Rev. Mr. Turell, minister of Medford, to which place 
 they had moved, that their stories were all false and 
 that their strange actions, begun in a playful spirit of 
 mischief, had been continued because they were 
 ashamed to own up. 
 
 When they heard of Mrs. Dudley's death, who, by 
 the way, was a most estimable woman and against 
 whom the children had no cause for ill-feeling, the 
 two oldest children were thoroughly frightened, and 
 for a long time lived in fear of a ghostly retribution. 
 
 Elizabeth told Mr. Turell that she got her idea of 
 acting in the strange manner from reading about 
 witchcraft, and the other children picked it up from 
 her. 
 
 There appears to have been some friction between 
 the town and Rev. Mr. Shattuck, the cause of which 
 is not apparent on the records, but which led to his 
 retirement from the ministry in 1730. For a year or 
 two previous there was a growing opposition to him, 
 manifested in the opposition to the customary vote of 
 £10 to him annually, in addition to his salary, in lieu 
 of paying the same into the Province treasury, and 
 finally, at the April meeting in 1730, the town refused 
 to appropriate his salary. Mr. Shattuck made a pro- 
 position to the town through Joseph Underwood, and 
 in accordance with that a committee consisting of 
 Capt. Isaac Powers, Robert Robins, Samuel Corey, 
 Dea. David Russell and Dea. John Wood were chosen 
 at a meeting May 11, 1730, to treat with Mr. Shat- 
 tuck concerning his dismissal, and the meeting ad- 
 journed to the first Monday in June, when it was 
 voted to refer the matter to the church, so that a 
 church meeting might be called with Mr. Shattuck's 
 son, for the purpose of calling a council to settle the 
 affair. 
 
 The church, however, came to an agreement with 
 the minister without the aid of a council, and upon 
 the report of that fact to a town-meeting August 24lh, 
 it agreed to his dismissal by a council to be called, 
 and his salary to the middle of the following May was 
 voted. 
 
 The town began immediately, however, to hear 
 candidates preach, and probably Mr. Shattuck did 
 not officiate further. 
 
 With the prospect of a new minister the town be- 
 gan to consider building a new meeting-house, and 
 in December, 1730, it was voted that when the town 
 should think proper to build, the location should be 
 on the Ridge Hill, as it was then called, describing 
 the present location of the First Congregational (Uni- 
 tarian) Church. 
 
 In the following July the town voted to call Rev. 
 Daniel Rogers, who is previously referred to as " Son 
 of y' worshipfull Mr. Dan'. Rogers, Esq''., which has 
 Lately preached at Byfield." The word " which " 
 here refers, I think, to the sou, as I cannot find that 
 his father was a minister. 
 
 The town voted £200 for his settlement and a 
 yearly salary of £100, but that does not seem to have 
 been sufficient to secure him, and in October the offer 
 of settlement was raised to £300 and of salary to 
 £1-10 a year, to rise and fall with silver, the standard 
 to be eighteen shillings per ounce. Mr. Rogers ac- 
 cepted and was ordained March 15, 1731-32. 
 
12 
 
 LITTLETON. 
 
 There is a tradition that Mr. Rogers was descended 
 from John Rogers, the martyr, but that is denied by 
 so good an aulbority as Mr. John Ward Dean, of the 
 New Engliind Historic Genealogical Society. Mr. 
 Rogers was, however, a grandson of Rev. John Rogers, 
 president of Harvard College, and great-grandson of 
 Rev. Nathaniel Rogers, who came from England about 
 1636, and settled in Ipswich, and was born in Ips- 
 wich October 17, 1706, and graduated at Harvard 
 College in 1725. His first marriage was in 1734-35 to 
 Mary, daughter of Rev. John Whiting, of Concord. 
 She died three days after (he d-eath of her child in 
 February, 1738. In May, 1739, Mr. Rogers married 
 for his second wife, Mrs. Elizabeth Dummer, widow 
 of Samuel Dummer, of Wilmington, and daughter of 
 Rev. Samuel Ruggles, of Billerica, — they had nine 
 children. 
 
 One of his sons, Jeremiah Dummer Rogers, a law- 
 yer, was one of the addressors of Hutchinson in 1774, 
 and removed to Boston. He was a Tory, and, after 
 the battle of Bunker Hill, was appointed commissary 
 to the Royal troops that continued to occupy Charles- 
 town, and lived in a house on the present site of the 
 Unitarian Church, corner of Main and Green Streets. 
 At the time of the evacuation of Boston he went with 
 other Royalists to Halifax, where he died in 1784. His 
 son, of the same name, became a classical teacher in 
 England, though a Harvard graduate, and had Lord 
 Byron for one of his pupils. Daniel Rogers, another 
 son of Rev. Daniel Rogers, continued to live in Lit- 
 tleton, and ended his days there. 
 
 An ordination in those days must have been quite 
 an affair. The town entertained liberally and paid 
 bills for the same to the amount of £41, for Mr. 
 Rogers' ordination. 
 
 The meeting-house question came up again in 1738, 
 and the question was whether to move the old one or 
 build new. June 12th the town voted not to move 
 the old meeting-house, and, on December 25th, voted 
 to build a new one, and chose a committee of seven 
 to see what to do with the old one and decide on di- 
 mensions of the new one. No money appears to have 
 been appropriated for the meeting-house until No- 
 vember 5, 1739, and probably nothing definite was 
 done until then, when £250 was voted in part. No- 
 vember 19th, £350 more was appropriated, and de- 
 cided that the building should be forty by fifty feet 
 with twenty-three feet posts. The Building Commit- 
 tee were Maj. Eleazer Lawrence, Deacon John Wood 
 and Benjamin Hoar. £300 more were voted in De- 
 cember, 1740, to complete the meeting-house, making 
 £900 in all. The building was not completed until 
 1742. Those who had private pews built them at 
 their own cost, except Mr. Rogers and Mr. Shattuck, 
 for whom and their familits, the town built pews. 
 Mr. Rogers had his at the foot of the pulpit-stairs and 
 Mr. Sh&ttuck in the rear, on the women's side. 
 
 This meeting-house had a gallery, which the former 
 one probably had not, but I have no reason to sup- 
 
 pose there was any great change in the arrangement 
 of pews from that in the old one. 
 
 About the time of which I am writing, a serious 
 trouble arose between the proprietors of Liitlcton and 
 the town of Stow about the boundary between the two 
 towns, and quite a tract of land, in what is now Box- 
 borough, was claimed by Stow, but finally relinquished 
 after a long lawsuit lasting many years, and after at- 
 tempts to get action in favor of Stow by the Legisla- 
 ture. I find records referring to ihe matter in 1732, 
 1740 and in 1750. 
 
 In this suit Littleton Proprietors' Record- Book wa? 
 used as evidence, and by mistake was not returned to 
 the town until Mr. Richard H. Dana, the second of 
 that name, found it among some old paper,'', a century 
 or more afterward. Littleton's counsel was Mr. Ed- 
 mund Trowbridge, and I have been told that Mr. 
 Dana married into the Trowbridge family. 
 
 An addition to the territory of the town was made 
 January 4, 1738-39, when the General Court granted 
 the petition of Pel eg Lawrence and others, -of Grolon, 
 so far as that they and their estates be set off to Lit- 
 tleton, thereby probably establishing the present line. 
 Groton did not oppose that part of the petition, but 
 opposed and prevented the establishment of the line 
 as originally asked for, which they claimed would in- 
 clude part of their proprietors' land. Pelfg Law- 
 rence lived near the brook by North Littleton Station, 
 where the cellar-hole may yet be ^een. 
 
 A curious entry occurs in the town records under 
 date of May 27, 1751, as follows: 
 
 '■ Voted to accept Jacob negro, gon of Caesar, for an inhnliitant of this 
 town in case Mr. Peter Reed give up the bill of Bale of &■* negro to the 
 town and write a discharge." 
 
 That gives the town an anti-slavery record of early 
 date. Slaves were owned in town, however, much 
 later. 
 
 Within the first thirty-five years of the existence of 
 the town a great many roads were laid out and re- 
 corded in the town-book. Most of them were merely 
 paths, marked by blazed trees, following very tortu- 
 ous routes, quite different from the present roads. 
 
 For instance, the road from Chelmsford to Groton 
 was through the Old Common, turning beyond Mr. 
 Shattuck's (now Mrs. Eliza Hartwell's) to the right 
 through Turkey Swamp and across Beaver Brook to 
 the Farr place, where Mr. Chas. P. Hartwell now 
 lives, then through the New Estate, turning eastward 
 to Saml. Dudley's, near the mill pond, from whence 
 it went to Pingreyville; a branch probably turned to 
 the left past Saml. Hunt's tavern, near Mr. Peter S. 
 Whitcomb's house. 
 
 The first road to Newtown started from the Old 
 Common, a short distance east of the house of the 
 late Capt. Luther White. 
 
 The road to the south part of the town passed 
 Joseph Baker's, which was at a spot now marked by a 
 large elm, midway between Mr. W. H. Tenney's and 
 the Haley place, from whence it went past a cellar- 
 
J ,//i^^"'"- 
 
LITTLETON. 
 
 13 
 
 hole and spring in the woods which locates the house 
 of Capt. Jusepli Harwood, and thence on through the 
 valley to the place now owned by Mr. J. A. Prieat, 
 then owned by one of the Powers family, and so on. 
 
 Under the system of representation in the Legisla- 
 ture which was in force a century and a half ago the 
 members of the lower Hou;e were elected by the 
 towns, and Littleton was obliged to send a Repre- 
 sentative oace in a certain number of year-, and also 
 obliged to pay him. 
 
 The result was that the town very frequently failed 
 to send a Representative and was repeatedly fined by 
 the General Court therefor. The year following the 
 fine the town would elect a Representative for the 
 sole purpose, apparently, of getting the fine remitted. 
 A fine or some question before the Legislature re- 
 garding Littleton's territory seems to have been the 
 only incentive to representation. On one occasion 
 the town voted to send a Representative if any one 
 would go for half-pay, and on another if for £12. lu 
 this last instance Captain Isaac Powers accepted the 
 offer and was elected without opposition. 
 
 In the year 1749 the town offered, in connection 
 with some of the adjoining towns, a bounty for wolves' 
 heads in addition to that offered by the Province, 
 with the condition that the ears be cut off to prevent 
 a second claim for bounty on the same head. 
 
 Almost invariably previous to the year 1800, and 
 frequently after that, it was customary to vote every 
 March meeting that the swine be allowed to go at 
 large the year ensuing. 
 
 Hog-reeves were chosen, whose duty it was to 
 insert a ring in each swine's nose to curtail the 
 amount of damage he could do by rooting. 
 
 Littleton Was represented in the French and In- 
 dian War, as she has always been in every struggle in 
 behalf of the St:ite and the nation, by brave and able 
 men. 
 
 Colonel John Porter, when only sixteen years of 
 age, enlisted as a captain's waiter and was at the bat- 
 tle of Ticonderoga. He was taken with the small- 
 pox, and hi^ mother, on hearing of it, hired a man to 
 go and care for him. This person took the money, 
 but soon reported that young Porter was dead. The 
 rascal had, in fact, never been near him, but in spite 
 of neglect Porter recovered, and great was the sur- 
 prise and joy of his family, who lived where Deacon 
 Manning now lives, to see him appear one day, weak 
 after his sickness and tired, sitting to rest on a log 
 near the house. 
 
 The 19th of April, 1775, found him returning from 
 Beverly through Lexington. The British troops had 
 just marched out toward Concord. Porter procured 
 a gun and ammunition of a Lexington farmer, leav- 
 ing his horse as security, and joined the minute-men 
 who fought the regulars on their return from Con- 
 cord. 
 
 He served all through the Revolution, enlisting as 
 ensign and working up to be lieutenant, captain, 
 
 adjutant and major. At one time he was a recruiting 
 officer, and also served on the staff of Gen. Laftiyette. 
 He was at the battle of Bennington and afterward 
 sent home three or four of the Hessians there cap- 
 tured, to work as laborers on his farm, while he re- 
 mained at the front. He was present at the surren- 
 der of Cornwallis. 
 
 H.s title of colonel was acquired in the militia, 
 after the war. Colonel Porter was a man of great 
 force* of character, but had only such education as he 
 picked up himself. 
 
 It is said that his wife taught him to read. 
 
 Previous to the outbreak of the French War, on 
 July. 14, 1748, Jonathan Lawrence, Jr., and Ephraira 
 Powers, of Littleton, were in a squad of seventeen 
 men, who were traveling from Northfield to Fort 
 Dummer and Ashuelot. They were attacked by In- 
 dians, who captured Lawrence and took him to Can- 
 ada. Powers was stripped of clothing, arms and 
 ammunition and wounded in the head. In the latter 
 part of the war we find Jonathan Lawrence in Capt. 
 Lecmard Whiting's company in 17(30-01 in the " ex- 
 pedition for the total reduction of Canada," and with 
 him the following other Littleton men : Sergt. Peter 
 Procter, Sergt. Peter Fox, Ephraim Corey, Jonathan 
 Hartwell, who died in the expedition, George Hiber, 
 Joseph Hartwell, Robert Procter, Josiah Procter, 
 Moses Shattuck, David Stimpson, Samuel Tredwell, 
 David Trull, Abel Whitcomb, Silas Whitcomb and 
 Benjamin Worster. Captain Whiting then lived in 
 Westford, but soon after moved to Littleton, where 
 he kept tavern and was living here from 1764 to 1772 
 at least. He afterwards lived in HoUis, N. H., and 
 was a Tory during the War of the Revolution. 
 
 By the courtesy of the Massachusetts Historical 
 Society I am enabled to copy from the original jour- 
 nal of Lieutenant-Colonel John Winslow, dated 
 Bason of Annapolis Royal, Nova Scotia, May 28, 1755, 
 the names of many residents or natives of Littleton. 
 It reads : 
 
 " A Return of Lieutenant Col'' John Winslowa Company in the First 
 Battallion nf his Excellency, Gov Shirley's Regiments, rais"^ for the re- 
 moving the French Encroachments from his Majesty's Government of 
 Nova Scotia, Showing the names of the noU'Commisb*! officers and Priv- 
 ate men their station age Place of Birth Last residence and occupa _ 
 tiou. ... 
 "John Trainer, Private, 19, Loyth. Scotland, Littleton, Baker. 
 
 dipt. Hitmphrei/ Hobb' Comp<'. 
 Ephraim Warrin, Private, IS, Littleton, Litllotou, Lab'. 
 
 Captain Osgood Compartij, 
 Isaac Lawrance, Serjant, 24, Littleton, Littleton, Cooper. 
 David Powers, Corporal, 31, Littleton, Littleton, Husbandman. 
 Walter Powers, Private, 23, Littleton, Littleton, Uusbandman. 
 Isaac Whitcombe, Private, 21, Littleton, Littleton, Cordwainer. 
 Abel Hunt, Private, 22, Littleton, Littleton, Uusbandman. 
 Peter Hunt, Private, 2G, Littleton, Littleton, Cordwainer. 
 John Robins, Private, 28, Littleton, Littleton, Cooper. 
 Charles Robins, Private, 25, Littleton, Littleton, Brickmaker. 
 Timothy Cobleigh, Private, 17, Littleton, Littleton, Laborer. 
 Ephrainr Wheeler, Private, 2), Littleton, Littleton, Cordwainer. 
 Abner Whitcombe, Private, 21, Littleton, Littleton, Husbandman. 
 
14 
 
 LITTLETON. 
 
 Benj» aiunrow, Private, 39, Lexington, Littleton, Laborer. 
 Plilnras Parker, Private, 21, Groton, Littleton, Hnsbandniau. 
 James Miller, Private, 20, Billcrica, Littleton, Brickniaker. 
 Thomas Wbitcoml), Private, 19, Littleton, Littleton, Laborer. 
 
 lifajov Joeejjli Vryes Company. 
 Jobn Ailamp, Private, 19, Littleton, Andovcr, Cordwainer. 
 
 Major William BourUif Company. 
 Thomas KdwardF, Private, 22, Littleton, Oxford, Carpenter. 
 
 Captain Elijah Willarjs Company. 
 Aaron Taylor, Corporal, 25, Littleton, Lunenburgh, Ilusbandinan. 
 Tini° Baker, Private, 24, Littleton, Petersbani, Tajlor. 
 Job;i Tuvlor, Private, 25, Littleton, LnnenburgU, Laborer. 
 
 CapUiin Ephraim Jones Company. 
 Oliver Edward, Private, 20, Littleton, Stow, Laborer. 
 £lict PovvelB, Private, 22, Littleton, Acton, Husbiiudman." 
 
 Capt. John Fox, of Littleton, was aUo in the French 
 War. He returned sick from the expedition on the 
 Kennebec River, and after six weeks' illness died. 
 
 Others of his family took the same disease from 
 him, and on petition from his wife the Legislature 
 granted money in aid of herself and family. Capt. 
 Fox kept tavern in the Centre, and after his death 
 his wife continued the business. 
 
 As we approach the period of the War of the 
 Eevolution, it is well to take, as far as we are able, 
 a general view of the town. What was Littleton in 
 those days, we ask ? Not so very diflferent from the 
 Littleton of to-day. 
 
 The population varied not more than one hundred 
 from the present, though the territory was larger, in- 
 cluding a large section of Boxborough, and therefore 
 the people were rather more scattered. In the year 
 1776 the population was 918. 
 
 The church stood on the same spot as the present 
 Unitarian Church. The town had just bought a new 
 bell, and had hung it not on the church, but on a 
 convenient frame near by. The committee to buy it, 
 reported that it was made in " this Province," and 
 cost £78 0«. "did. Very many of the names now famil- 
 iar were then in town, such as Robbins, Lawrence, 
 Whitcomb, Tuttle, Taylor, Hartwell, Jewett, Harwood, 
 Tenney, Sanderson, Reed, Brown, Proctor, Warren, 
 Hoar, Dodge, Kimball, Patch and others. Even the 
 farms are in many cases held in the same families 
 now as then. 
 
 It is very interesting to trace the growth of imblic 
 sentiment in town concerning the relations of the 
 colonies with the mother country. 
 
 The indignation at the exactions and oppressive acts 
 of the British government was spontaneous and unani- 
 mous ; but later on, when protests, entreaties and de- 
 mands had not availed, and matters wore a more serious 
 aspect, when it began to dawn upon the colonists that 
 their only hope for justice lay in revolution, then it 
 was that a diflerence of opinion was evolved, which in- 
 creased with the progress of events until the line 
 between patriot and Tory was clearly drawn. 
 
 When we think of how the colonists, with their 
 scanty resources and slight preparation, resisted, made 
 war on and finally vanquished the greatest power on 
 earth, it seems as if they accomplished impossibilities, 
 which it would be madness to attempt. 
 
 It was notstrange, then, that there were many con- 
 servative and intelligent people, who considered it 
 folly to attempt to resist the government of England ; 
 they deprecated the state of affairs, but saw no pros- 
 pect of relief in war, and in most cases were further 
 influenced in their opinions by ties of friendship and 
 relation to the mother country. That class was rep- 
 resented in Littleton by Rev. Daniel Rogers and at 
 least one of hia sons, also by Capt. Joseph Harwood, 
 and his son of the same name, as well as by others. 
 Mr. Rogers was then an old man, had been pastor for 
 many years, and was universally loved and respected. 
 He was a cultured and refined gentleman, a graduate 
 of Harvard College, and connected with some of the 
 best families in the Province. His sons were able and 
 educated men, and took an active part in town aflairs. 
 Others of the Tory sympathizers were prominent men 
 in town and, with Dummer Rogers, had been the lead- 
 ers so long as matters had drifted along in the old 
 way ; but when the issue came, and iceling began to 
 run high, they found themselves a small minority, 
 and had to sutler the consequences at the intense feel- 
 ing which prevailed against them. 
 
 They were suddenly dropped from the list of town 
 officers and vigorously dealt with. Many of them 
 were put under guard, including one of the writer's 
 ancestors, and even Rev. Mr. Rogers was summoned 
 by an armed squad to come out of his house and de- 
 clare his principles. When he hesitated, perhaps 
 considering it beneath his dignity to comply with 
 such a demand, a volley was fired into his front door. 
 The bullets passed through the door and entered 
 the casing just below the stairs upon which Mr. 
 Rogers was standing. He then complied. He lived 
 where Mr. George Whitcomb now lives, in the house 
 which has since been moved down the hill toward 
 Mr. Frost's. Many persons, including the writer, 
 have seen the bullet-holes in the old door, which has 
 since been replaced by a new one, and those in the 
 casing may be seen to-day. 
 
 Of the patriots, William Henry Prentice seems to 
 have been one of the leaders. He kept a tavern at 
 or near where Mr. Everett E. Kimball lives, and we 
 may readily imagine that as the headquarters where 
 each evening the earnest patriot farmers, many of 
 them minute-men, gathered to hear the latest news 
 from Boston and to discuss it excitedly over mugs of 
 flip. 
 
 To go back now to 1770. The following article, 
 copied from the Boston Oazetle of March 12ih, of that 
 year, the same issue in which appeared an account of 
 the Boston Massacre, so called,- gives an idea of the 
 unanimous feeling in the town over the taxes imposed 
 by Parliament on imported goods: 
 
.^>^5^^ 
 
LITTLETON. 
 
 15 
 
 '* At a Meeting of the Inhabitants of the Town of Litttleton, in the 
 Ck>nnty of Middlesex, on Monday, Mar. .% 1770, a Committee was chosen 
 to prepare certain Votes to be passed by the Town relating to the Impor- 
 tation of British Goods who after retiring a Short Time into a private 
 Room, returned and reported the following which waa unanimously 
 Voted. 
 
 '*The grievous Inipositiona the Inhabitants of the Uritish Coionies 
 have long Buffered from their Mother Country, strongly claim their At- 
 tention to every legal Method for their Removal. We esteem the Meas- 
 ure already proposed, viz. : the m ithdrawing our Trade from England, 
 both oecononiical and effectual. We do therefore Vote 
 
 "1, That we will not (knowingly), directly or indirectly, purchase any 
 Goods which now are or hereafter maybe imported comraryto the 
 Agreenient of the Merchants of the Town of Boston. 
 
 "2. That if any Inhabitant of the town of Littleton shall be known 
 to purchase any one Article of an Importer of Goods contrary to the be- 
 fore mentioned Agreement or of any one who shall buy of any such Im- 
 porter he shall suffer our high Displeasure and Contempt. 
 
 *' 3. That a Committee be chosen to inspect the Conduct of all Buyera 
 and Sellers of Goods in this Town, and report the Names of all (if any 
 audi thei-e should be) who shall violate the true Spirit and Intention of 
 the above-mentioned Votes and Resolutions. 
 
 •'4. That we will not dritik or purchase *ny foreign Tea howsoever 
 Imported until a general Importation of British Goods shall take 
 Place." 
 
 The committee who reported these resolutions 
 were Samuel Tutile, Leonard Whiting, Samuel Rog- 
 ers, Robert Harris and Nathan Raymond. 
 
 Matters went on from bad to worse throughout the 
 Colonies, and in November, 1772, when Boston under 
 the leadership of Samuel Adams came to an issue 
 with Governor Hutchinson about the stipendiary 
 judges, and the rights of towns to discuss such mat- 
 ters, and the Boston Committee of Correspondence 
 was chosen, with instructions to appeal to all the 
 towns in the Province, *' that," as they said, " the col- 
 lected wisdom and fortitude of the whole people 
 might dictate measures for the rescue of their happy 
 and glorious Constitution.'* A letter and pamphlet 
 were received from the Boston Committee of Corre- 
 spondence, and at a town-meeting in Littleton, De- 
 cember 3lst, it was voted to choose a committee of 
 five to consider the same and make a report to the 
 town. The committee consisted of J. Dummer Rog- 
 ers, Jona. Reed, Captain Joseph Harwood, Sr., Cap- 
 tain Josiah Hartwell and Samuel Reed. 
 
 From this time we must date the division of this 
 town into patriots and Tories. The committee was 
 divided in their report, which was made at an ad- 
 journed meeting for that purpose on February 1, 1773. 
 
 The majority of the committee, which we can confi- 
 dently assume included Dummer Rogers and Captain 
 Harwood, reported verbally "not to have the town 
 act any further upon that article." That was the con- 
 servative view, represented by those who must thence- 
 forth be called Tories. They feared a conflict with the 
 authorities, and tried to smother the correspondence 
 with Samuel Adams and tbe Boston patriots. 
 
 The town rejected the majority report, and then ac- 
 cepted the draft of a paper laid before them, and 
 chose a Committee of Correspondence. 
 
 At the annual meeting, March 1, 1773, the draft, 
 amended by the addition of more grievances, was ac- 
 cepted and ordered to be transmitted, with a respect- 
 
 ful letter of thanks, to the Boston Committee of Cor- 
 respondence. 
 
 This amended paper was as follows : 
 
 "The British Constiti:tion appears to us to be the best calculated to 
 answer the ends which mankind proposed to themselves iu forsakiug 
 the natural state of Independence and entering into Society tlian i er- 
 haps any form of Government under Heavi-n, as here we find a more 
 perfect union of the three Great Qualities of Government than could lie 
 expected in any other form ; it is therefore of high Importance that 
 those who live under this Constitution should in all proper wjiys en- 
 deavor to preserve it Inviolate ; it was the Happijiess of our forefathers 
 who came into this Land to bring with them the Liberties and Immuni- 
 ties of Englishmen and to be entitled to the Privileges of the British Con- 
 stitution, under which they and their Descendants have enjoyed great 
 Security and Happiness. But in consequenre of some acts of the British 
 Parliament, which are daily executing by officers and men unknown in 
 the Charter of the Province, whei'eby a llevenue is imposed on this as 
 well as the other Colonies, and extorted from us and appropriated to 
 most destructive purposes, the establishing the salaries of several of the 
 first men in this Province, and also of the Judges of the Superior Court, 
 thereby making them independent of the people, and making them de- 
 pend on the Crown for their support, the gnat extension of the power 
 of the Courts of Admiralty, the unlimited authority of the Board of Com- 
 missioners of his Majesty's Customs; alt which we look upon to be great 
 grievances ; the quartering of soldiers upon us in time of peace, without 
 our consent ; the demanding and giving up Castle William, our chief 
 fortress, into the hands of those over whom our Governor has declared he 
 has no control, is a gi-eat violation of one of our Charter Rights— for 
 thereby the Governor for the time being has full power to erect Forts, 
 and to furnish them with all things necessary, and to commit the cus- 
 tody of the same to such person or persons as to him shall seem meet. 
 The frequent alterations of the Boundaries between this and the other 
 colonies we think we have just reason to complain of; for thereby the 
 property of many hundreds of the inhabitants of this province are in- 
 vaded. 
 
 *' We are greatly alarmed by a late act of the British Parliament en- 
 titled An Act for the better preserving his Majestys Dock Yards, Maga- 
 zines, Sliips, Ammunitions and Stores ; By this act any person may be 
 apprphended on the most groundless pretence and carried to any part of 
 Great Britain for trial ; the thoughts of which is enough to make any 
 person having the least sense of the freedom of an Englishman tremble. 
 By this act we are deprived of one of the most essential of our Charter 
 Privileges, that of Trial by our Peers in this Vicinity. 
 
 '* We are further of the opinion that if the measures bo justly com- 
 plained of by the Provincesand the other Colonies on this continent are 
 persisted in and enforced by fleets and armies, they will, in a little time 
 we fear, issue in the total dissolution of the Union of tlie Mother Coun- 
 try and the Colonic s, to the entire loss of the former, and regret of the 
 latter— as the General Assembly is now sitting, who are the constitu- 
 tional guardians of the rights of the people, we hope that Assembly will 
 take every reasonable measure to obtain removal of all our grievances ; 
 we shall always be ready to join with the towns of this province in a 
 regular and constitutional method in preserving our liberties and privi- 
 leges." 
 
 Note how carefully the town considered the matter 
 and of what importance it was deemed. 
 
 It was the decisive step in the policy of the town, 
 and took three town-meetings to settle it, covering 
 nearly the whole winter. 
 
 There was no wavering or vacillation, but no hast^. 
 
 At the Middlesex Convention, held in Concord, 
 August 31, 1774, Littleton was represented by Captain 
 Josiah Hartwell, Oliver Hoar and Daniel Rogers, Jr., 
 and in the first Provincial Congress by Abel Jewett 
 and Robert Harris. 
 
 Tlie town records show conclusively that with the 
 opening of the year 1775 the approaching crisis was 
 felt to be near at hand and was prepared for. 
 
 Had we any full and accurate history of the events 
 
16 
 
 LITTLETON. 
 
 of that year, we should be astonished at the activity 
 and careful preparation. 
 
 There were at least two companies in the cour-se of 
 that year officered by Littleton men, and made up, in 
 a large majority, of privates from this town, a few be- 
 ing from the adjoining towns. 
 
 We may imagine them with the early spring, 
 ■which was a month in advance of the usual season, 
 holding frequent drills and musters, and the town 
 must then have been aglow with military spirit and 
 enthusiasm, which has never been equaled since. 
 
 The 19th of April came, and in the early morning 
 a messenger on horseback rode into town with the 
 news that the regulars were on the march to Concord. 
 
 The horseman then hurried over Beaver Brook 
 bridge, near Mr. Frost's house, and proceeded to warn 
 other towus. 
 
 The Littleton men mustered, ammunition to the 
 amount of fourteen pounds of powder and thirty eight 
 pounds of bullets was dealt out of the common stock, 
 and the whole squad, including many unenlisted vol- 
 unteers, proceeded to Concord, and thence to Cam- 
 bridge. 
 
 The following is the muster-roll of Lieutenant 
 Aquila Jewett's company who marched that day : 
 
 Aquila Jewett, lieutenant ; John Porter, Matthew Brooke, sergeants ; 
 Daniel Whitcomb, corporal. 
 
 Privates, Samuel I-awrence, Jonathan Lawrence, Charles White, Ben- 
 jamin Warren, Joseph Robbins, Samuel Hnrtwell, Silas Whitcomb, 
 Klisha Kobbins, Joseph Worster, Peter Fox, Job Dodge, Joseph Jewett, 
 Joseph Russell, Thomas Lawrenca, Nathan Chase, Willard Merriam, 
 Benjamin Moore, Maxi Jewett, Nathaniel Proctor, Moses Sanderson, 
 Joseph Raymond, Ebenezer Phillips, Israel Hinds, Simeon Proctor, 
 Samuel Tenney (4th), John Dix, William Tenney, Eleazer Lawrence, 
 Thomas Russell, Benjamin Hoar, Benjamin Hartwell, John Green, John 
 Whiting, Jr., Stephen Tuttle, Thomas Stearns, Sampson Warren, DAniel 
 Tuttle, Peter Reed. Oliver Hartwell, Thomas Wood, Benjamin Worster, 
 John Tuttle. 
 
 A few of the men dropped out at Concord, but the 
 most of them are putdown as having marched twenty- 
 six miles and having served nineteen days. 
 
 Jonathan Warren and Nathaniel Whitcomb also 
 received ammunition, and so were probably either in 
 another company or went as unenlisted volunteers. 
 
 Among the rolls of the army at Cambridge made up 
 to August 1, 1775, is another company, mostly com- 
 posed of Littleton men, whit h was probably organ- 
 ized after the Concord tight. The list is as follows : 
 
 Captain, Samuel Gilbert ; Lieutenants, Joseph Gilbert, Joseph Baker, 
 Jr. ; Sergeants, Daniel Kimball, Jacob Porter, Thomas Treadwell, 
 Ephraim Proctor ; Corporals, Ezra Baker, Jonathan Cowdrey. 
 
 Privates. Joseph Baker, Cornelius Bachelor, Benjamin Cox, Lemuel 
 Dole, James Dutton, Benjamin Durant, John Diusnioie, Benjamin Dole, 
 William Farr, Samuel Hunt, Joseph Heywood, Moses Holden, Isaac Law- 
 rence, Peter Cnraniings Gilbert, Elijah Proctor, Jonathan Phelps, Samuel 
 Phillips, Paul Robbins, John Robbins, Isaac Russell, Nathaniel Russell, 
 Oliver Sawyer, James Whittemore, Peter Whitcomb, Isaac Whitcomb, — 
 
 with others from Lancaster, Dunstable and other 
 towns. 
 
 This company of Captain Gilbert's was also in Colo- 
 nel Prescotl's regiment, and took part in the battle of 
 Bunker Ilill, in which were killed Peter Whitcomb, 
 
 Benjamin Dole, John Lawrence, James Whittemore 
 and Isaac Whitcomb. 
 
 In addition to those whose names have been given, 
 the following served for Littleton in the continental 
 army, at various times, during the war : 
 
 Amos Atherton, Paul Brown, Peter Baker, Timothy Baker, William 
 Burke, John Caveiuler, Joseph Carter, Henry Durant, Jason Dunster, 
 Jesse Dutton, David Baker, John Brown, Lucius Blaiichurd, Scipio 
 Chase, HilJrelh Dutton, Joseph Dole, John Dodge, John Dix, Jonathan 
 Fletcher, John Foster, Solomon Foster, Jonathan Langlee Fisher, Jamis 
 Holden, John Hartwell, Captain Aaron Jewett, William Johnson, 
 William Johnson, Jr., John Kilbnrn, Abel Lawrence, Reuben Leighfon, 
 Joseph Lewis, Jonathan Longley, Joseph Longley, Scipio Negro, Thomas 
 Nutting, Peter Oliver, Charles Phipps, Timothy Proctor, Samuel I'ool, 
 Abel Proctor, Amos Parling, Jr., Zuchary Kobbins, Jonathan Russell, 
 John Russell, Jr., Lieutenant-Colonel Jonathan Reed, Samuel Reed, 
 Samuel Reed, Jr., Artemas Heed, Nathaniel Reed, William Smilli, 
 Samuel Stearns, Levi Sbepherd, Robert Sever, Amos Shed, William Ten- 
 ney, Jeremiah Temple, Jonathan Tuttle, John Wood (;id). Sergeant 
 Peter Wheeler, Peter Wright, Stephen Wright, Jacob Warren, Samue) 
 White, William Whiting, Jonathan Wetherbee, Second Lieutenant 
 Ephraim Whitcomb, Paul Whitcomb. 
 
 These names have been collected by the writer 
 from the Kevolutionary rolls in the State archives, 
 and from town records and vouchers. The number is 
 surprisingly large. That 150 meu, or nearly seventy- 
 five per cent, of the male population, of military age, 
 should have taken part in the war, speaks volumes 
 for the patriotism of the town, and, as well, shows the 
 desperate character of the struggle. The male popu- 
 lation of sixteen years of age, and over, was only 209 
 on January 1, 1777. 
 
 The smoke from the burning of Charlestown was 
 distinctly seen in Littleton, and caused great alarm. 
 
 In May the town had voted to purchase a stock of 
 fire-arms with bayonets, the number to be left to the 
 discretion of the selectmen, who were that year 
 Major Jonathan Reed, Jonathan Patch, Samuel Gil- 
 bert, William Henry Prentice and Aaron Jewett. 
 Notice that three out of the five afterwards served as 
 officers in the continental army. 
 
 At a town-meeting held June 17, 1776, at which 
 William Henry Prentice was moderator, the follow- 
 ing vote, in accordance with the recommendation of 
 the General Court, was passed after some debate and 
 motions to adjourn, which were not carried : 
 
 "If the Hon' Congress should, for the Safety of ths Colonies, Declare 
 them Independent of the Kingdom of Great Britain, the Inhabitants of 
 Littleton engage to support them in the measure." 
 
 Ou October 14th following, the town voted its con- 
 sent to the plan proposed by a resolve of the House 
 of Representatives that the Council and House should 
 propose a State Constitution to be submitted to the 
 people. 
 
 In March, 1777, the town voted a bounty of £18 in 
 addition to the State bounty, for every three years' 
 soldier who should make one for its quota, and also 
 voted " to take up the matter at large from the 19th of 
 April, 1775, and Chuse a Committee to apprise each 
 Campaign and make an Everage according to their 
 poles and Rateable Estatts, as other Ta.xes are Levied, 
 and that each man shall have credite for what he has 
 done." 
 
0o/rf^rLC€^^f-vJ S^Cr^i^T" 
 
LITTLETON. 
 
 17 
 
 As the war progressed and more men were caUed 
 for, it became difficult to procure them, and no won- 
 der, when we consider the great number who went 
 from this small town, and at one meeiing it was im- 
 I)ossible to choose a committee who would serve to 
 hire men. 
 
 The fluctuations of continental money were ex- 
 tremely embarrassing, and a large number of bounties 
 were paid in rye and other produce, which was pre- 
 ferred to paper money. As high as £2550 in paper 
 money was paid for a single bounty. 
 • On December 21, 1780, the town voted " 100 hard 
 dollars or other specie equivalent & 1 Pr. good shirts, 
 shoes & stockings, to be delivered yearly in October, 
 60 long as they serve, to all soldiers who enlist accord- 
 ingly." 
 
 By summing up the various appropriations for the 
 payment of soldiers and purchase of supplies, as re- 
 corded on the town records, I find they amount to the 
 enormous sum of £126,172 Ids. lOrf., or its equiva- 
 lent in produce. 
 
 It must be remembered, however, that this was not 
 all hard money, but much of it was continental paper 
 currency. While on the other hand it is probable 
 that this sum does not include a great dex\ of money 
 which was paid out on account of the war, but did not 
 appear under specific appropriations. 
 
 Captain Aaron Jewett was a delegate from Little- 
 ton to the Constitutional^ Convention of 1779. This 
 gentleman, after seiving in the war, became a Shaker, 
 and was one of the founders of the Harvard Shakers. 
 Rev. Mr. Rogers, being quite advanced in years, 
 asked a dismission in January, 1776. Not desiring to 
 have him sever his connection with them, the church 
 voted not to dismiss him, whereupon Mr. Rogers pro- 
 posed that he continue his relations to the church as 
 minister, but relinquish his salary in future and be 
 released from obligation to perform ministerial ser- 
 vices. 
 
 This proposition was accepted, and the town began 
 to iQok for a colleague, and it is noticeable that at this 
 time the initiative in ecclesiastical matters was taken by 
 the church meeting, which first took action, and after- 
 wards the town voted on concurrence. After calling 
 two ministers as coUeaguei, first Mr. Wheaton, then 
 Mr. John Bullard, who do not appeir to have accepted, 
 and then waiting for some time, finally in October, 
 1780, Mr. Edmund Foster was called, and accepted, at 
 a salary of £80 a year, based on the value of certain 
 articles of consumption, such as corn, pork, beef, &c., 
 as recorded, and a settlement of £200. 
 
 Mr. Foster was ordained at Littleton January 
 17, 1781, and succeeded to the ministry on the death 
 of Mr. Rogers, in November, 1782. 
 
 Mr. Foster was born in North Reading, Massachu- 
 setts, April 18, 1752, and was left an orphan when 
 seven years old ; he worked his way through Yale 
 College, anB afterwards studied for the ministry. 
 Both Harvard and Yale conferred honorary degrees 
 
 upon him. While a divinity student he shouldered 
 his musket and went to face the enemy at Concord 
 and Lexington. 
 
 He represented his district both in the Senate and 
 House, after the War of 1812 (in which three of his 
 sons held commissions) ; on one occasion he preached 
 the Election sermon, and was a delegate to the Con- 
 stitutional Convention of 1820. He died March 28, 
 1826, in the forty-sixth year of his ministry. 
 
 Mr. Foster assumed his duties as colle.i^ue to Mr. 
 Rogers under very adverse circumstances; he was 
 called against the opposition of a minority, who re- 
 corded a protest signed by forty-six persons. The 
 town was impoverished by the cost of the war, and in 
 1782-8.*? by severe drouth, and was in the midst of 
 the hardest times ever seen in this country. 
 
 It was found difficuH to raise his salary, and he was 
 obliged on one occasion to bring suit before he got it. 
 The town settled and paid costs. 
 
 The hard times, as is always the case, made discon- 
 tent, the church was badly out of repair, so much so 
 that it had to be propped up, and furthermore a 
 movement was started a few years before Mr. Foster 
 came to set off the south part of the town for the pur- 
 pose of forming a new parish, which resulted in the 
 formation of first the district and finally the town of 
 Boxborough. 
 
 The first reference to this matter appears in the 
 town records under date of November 4, 1778, when 
 the town chose a committee consisting of Deacon 
 Josiah Hartwell, Jonathan Reed, Esq. and Mr. Dan- 
 iel Rogers, Jr., to wait on the General Court and 
 show reason why the south part of the town should 
 not be set off as petitioned for. The same committee 
 was chosen for the same purpose in the following 
 February, and in July there was an article in the 
 town warrant to see if the town would "vote off" 
 that part of the town to form a new parish, with parts 
 of Stow and Harvard. The town voted against it. 
 
 In October, 1780, a vote was passed to take the 
 names of those who wished to be set ofl", and it is re- 
 corded that Bennet Wood, Phis Wetherbee, Israel 
 Wetherbee, Abel Fletcher, Ephraim Whitcomb, Ed- 
 ward Brown and Boston Draper appeared. 
 
 In February, 1781, the town again chose a com- 
 mittee to oppose the petition to the General Court. 
 This attempt to form a new town or parish was a 
 failure, as had been the previous one, but in March, 
 1782, Silas Taylor and sixty-nine others petitioned 
 the General Court again, stating that they were at a 
 great distance from the meeting-houses in the towns 
 to which they belong, to remedy which they had built 
 a house for public worship in a convenient place and 
 procured preaching much of the time for several 
 years previous, but had not been excused from paying 
 for the support of preaching in some of the towns to 
 which they belonged, and praying to be incorporated 
 into a town, district or parish. The petition was re- 
 ferred to the second session, in September, when the 
 
18 
 
 LITTLETON. 
 
 committee to which it had besQ referred reported 
 ■th:it the petitioners who belonged to the towns of 
 ■Stow and Harvard should be incorporated into a dis- 
 trict with such of the inhabitants of Littleton as were 
 included in the petition, and should, within the space 
 of twelve months, signify that they desired to belong 
 to the said district and no other. 
 
 Littleton people had evidently been caught nap- 
 ping, but as soon as they learned of the report of the 
 committee they sent to the General Court two remon- 
 strances, one signed by the selectmen and the other 
 by Samuel Lawrence, Ellas Taylor, Thomas Wood, 
 Daniel Whitcomb, Jonathan Patch, Nathaniel Uob- 
 ]eigh, John Wood, Solomon Foster and Jedediah 
 Taylor, living within the bounds of the proposed dis- 
 trict. It was, however, too late, and a bill was passed 
 February 25, 1783, which, after stating the bounda- 
 •ries, said : " And all the Polls ?nd Estates that are 
 included within the said boundaries shall belong to 
 said Dis-trict, except those of such of the inhabitants 
 •of that part set off from Littleton as shall not, within 
 the term of twelve months from the passing of this 
 Act, return their names unto the office of the Secre- 
 tary of this Commonwealth, signifying their desire to 
 become inhabitants of the said District." The result 
 •of this was, that while a number returned their names 
 as desiring to join the new di.»trict, yet others, to the 
 jiumber of thirteen or more, did not, but preferred to 
 remain in Littleton. 
 
 In June, 1703, Boxborough, which had become a 
 town, petitioned the General Court to establish an 
 obvious and uncontrovertible boundary between that 
 town and Littleton, against which the thirteen citi- 
 zens of Littleton who had the right to join Boxbor- 
 ough, but had not done so, remonstrated, stating that 
 they believed the object of the petition was " more to 
 •divide them from the town of Littleton than to ascer- 
 tain more certain boundaries." Thereupon the Leg- 
 islature passed the act of February 20, 1794, which 
 .gave the owners of sucli farms lying on the Boxbor- 
 ough side of the straight line which was originally 
 proposed as the boundary, and who had not joined 
 Boxborough in accordance with the act of 1783, the 
 right to apply to Boxborough to have their polls and 
 •estates bdong to that town, and the same was to be 
 accomplished upon the vote of Boxborough and 
 proper notice to the town oS Littleton. This right 
 "was to go with the ownership of the land. In the 
 course of time all the farms in question had been 
 transferred to Bozborough save two, owned in 1868 
 by Henry T. Taylor and Wm. H. Hartwell. At that 
 time Boxborough petitioned the Legislature to have 
 those farms set off to her, but was unsuccessful. 
 Another attempt was made before the Legislature of 
 the present year, 1890. It wiw met by opposition on 
 the.part of the owners of the two farms, now Deacon 
 Henry T. Taylor and Mrs. Olive Ilall, and the town 
 ■of Littleton, who remonstrated and filed a counter- 
 jetitiouj asking for a new line between the two towns, 
 
 which leaves the greater part of the two farms and 
 the buildings on the Littleton side, as well as a small 
 place, formerly in Boxborough, lying between them on 
 
 Liberty Square, and owned by Wild, thus doing 
 
 away with the previous provisions allowing a transfer 
 to Boxborough. The Littleton petition was granted 
 and a bill passed in accordance with it. The Taylor 
 farm is the same which was owned, in 1783, by Dea- 
 con Elias Taylor, the ancestor of Deacon Henry T. 
 Taylor, having remained in the family from that 
 time. The Hall farm was then owned by Samuel 
 Lawrence, and was the same where the Lawrence 
 Tavern was kept, the sign to which bore the legend 
 " Pay To-Day & Trust To-morrow,' with the picture 
 of an officer with a drawn sword, below which was 
 the word " Entertainment" and date 1768. 
 
 As has been stated, the meeting-house was out of 
 repair at the time Mr. Foster came to Littleton, and 
 for several years the question of building a new one 
 or repairing the old one was agitated, and many votes 
 on the subject were passed and afterwards reconsid- 
 ered. Finally, on December 31, 1792, the decisive 
 vote passed to build anew on the same spot, and the 
 town proceeded to erect its third meeting-house, 
 " 40x55 feet, with a steeple and porches." It was com- 
 pleted in the summer of 1794, and was a very impos- 
 ing structure and really fine for its period. A new 
 bell was procured in 1808. 
 
 The meeting-house appears never to have been 
 heated except by religious fervor or a town-meeting 
 discussion until 1818, when, in January, the town 
 voted to have two stoves, provided they were given by 
 subscription. They must have been popular, for in 
 October, 1820, it was thought best to vote " that the 
 town considers that the stove pews are appropriated 
 to elderly people." 
 
 The history of the way in which paupers have 
 been cared for in this town is rather interesting. The 
 first pauper on record was the widow, Thanks Dill, 
 concerning whom there appears to have been a ques- 
 tion between this town and Concord as to where she 
 belonged. The poor woman was carried back and 
 forth from one town to the other and finally died in 
 Littleton in 1733, whereupon the town expended nine 
 shillings for rum for her funeral and a further sum 
 for gloves used on the same occasion. It was a 
 common thing to carry paupers to other towns to get 
 rid of them, and to warn out of town persons who 
 were likely to become a charge against the town. 
 
 In 1787 paupers were put out by vendue, among 
 them several illegitimate children. In 1798 the town , 
 voted to hire a house for the town's poor. The town 
 farm was purchased in 1825. 
 
 Any one walking up Everett E. Kimball's lane to 
 the top of Long Pond Hill will see the remains of a 
 road which formeriy ran where the lane is over the 
 highest part of the hill to the Haley place. The 
 recordsshow that this road, from Williai^ Henry Pren- 
 tice's to Edward Baker's, as it was described, was ex- 
 
SIGN OF THE LAWRENCE TAVERN, 
 
 The present Residence of DAVID HALL. 
 
 This sign now liangs in the Reuben Hoar Library, to which it was 
 presented by Mrs. William H. Hartwell. 
 
LITTLETON. 
 
 19 
 
 changed, in 1789, for the present road to Newtown, 
 turning oflf by the present residence of William H. 
 Tenney,and that the road was turned a little to one 
 side so as not to obstruct Dea. Oliver Hoar's " out 
 seller," thug showing the antiquity of 31r. Tenney's 
 side-hill cellar. 
 
 In 1801 the town voted to buy a piece of land of 
 Mr. Rogers and others in front of the meeting-house 
 to enlarge the road and Common. The line, as then 
 located, ran very close to where the rear wall of the 
 town-hall now stand.s, and a strip was added to give 
 space behind the building when it was erected in 
 188(3. 
 
 The town records make no allusion to the War of 
 1812, but from other sources the names of three Lit- 
 tleton men who served have been obtained as follows: 
 Sampson Warren, who returned from the war sick 
 and died at home, Micajah Rice and Reuben Durant. 
 No doubt others from this town also served in that 
 war. 
 
 December 4, 1815, Rev. Mr. Foster preached a cen- 
 tury sermon on the history of the town. It was an 
 able and interesting discourse and the writer is in- 
 debted to it for much information. From it we learn 
 that the post-office at that time was on the "great 
 road," probably at the " long store," now the dwell- 
 ing-house of Charles F. Watts. • The town voted to 
 print three hundred copies of Mr. Foster's sermon to 
 distribute to every family and sell the rest for the 
 benefit of Mr. Foster. 
 
 Up to 1822 there had been but one church, the town 
 church, and as we have seen, church business was 
 done in town-meeting by the town acting in its ca- 
 pacity as a parish. 
 
 On March 14, 182j, the Baptist Society was organ- 
 ized with twelve members. It had been intended ta 
 
 orggnii-o "n thf 7>" i '"'^ *''"' >""'" '-"'"d *■ 
 
 t he U3C of tho ohtireh fur that purpooo on that diUo . 
 
 Rev. Benjamin Willard had preached for the Baptists 
 previous to their organization at various times from 
 1820 and until 1823. There was also preaching in 
 the interest of other denominations about this time. 
 
 In April, 1821, the town voted leave to Aaron Tut- 
 tle and others to have preaching in the West School- 
 house on Sundays. 
 
 These inroads on his flock were nalur.iUy distaste- 
 ful to Mr. Foster and he took vigorous measures to 
 oppose them. On several occasions he attended the 
 meetings and addressed the audience in refutation of 
 the doctrines there promulgated, and once he took 
 possession of the meeting with the announcement 
 that he was the minister of the town, and proceeded 
 to conduct the services and then dismissed the audi- 
 ence, so that they had no opportunity to hear the 
 speakers who were present to address them. 
 
 In the church Mr. Foster had ruling elders appoint- 
 ed to assist him in bringing back to communion those 
 who absented themselves to hear the " itinerant and 
 disorderly preachers." A few were brought back, but 
 
 many joined the Baptist Society and all received in- 
 dividually a vote of public censure. 
 
 The Baptists built their first meeting-house in 1822, 
 on the corner of the road leading to the north part of 
 the town, where now stands the house of the late John 
 P. Tuttle. It was built of brick, and was dedicated 
 July 9, 1823. Rev. Amasa Sanderson was ordained 
 their minister at the same time and continued his 
 pastorate until March 23, 1831. 
 
 The succeeding Baptist ministers have been : Rev. 
 Silas Kenney, 1831-34 ; Rev. O. Ayer, 1837-13 ; Rev. 
 T. H. Lunt, April, 1844, to March, 1845 ; Rev. Aaron 
 Haynes, April, 1845-47 ; Rev. B. H. Clift, June, 1847, 
 to February, 1848; Rev. George Matthew-, May, 
 1848-52 ; Rev. F. E. Cleaves, Jhne, 1852, to October, 
 1857 ; Rev. I). F. Lampson, July, 1858, to April, 
 1861 ; Rev. C. M. Willard, August, 1861, to Novem- 
 ber, 1867; Rev. C. L. Frost, August 1868, to June, 
 1869; Rev. J. F. Morton, September, 1869, to Sep- 
 tember, 1872 ; Rev. B. N. Sperry, January, 1873, to 
 May, 1875; Rev. William Read, July, 1875, to May, 
 1878; Rev. Paul Gallaher, November, 1878, to No- 
 vember, 1880 ; Rev. W. H. Evans, December, 1880, 
 to July, 1883; Rev. R. G. Johnson, December, 1883, 
 to August, 1888; Rev. William J. Clones, September, 
 1888. 
 
 The brick meeting-house was burned, probably by 
 an incendiary August 5, 1840, and the present wooden 
 one built at the Old Common and dedicated in June, 
 1841. Within a few years it has been raised and a 
 ve-try built in the basement. 
 
 After the death of Mr. Foster the town voted, Octo- 
 ber 29, 1827, to cail Rev. William H. White to settle 
 as minister. He was born in Lancaster, Mass., in 
 1798, and lived on alarm in Westminster uatil he 
 was twenty-one years old, when he fitted for college 
 under the tuition of Rev. Dr. Stearns, of Lincoln. 
 
 Mr. White graduated at Brown University in 1824, 
 and at Cambridge Divinily School in 1827. He re- 
 ceived a call to preach in Kingston, Mass., but pre- 
 ferred Littleton, where he was ordained January 2, 
 1828. 
 
 It is said that it had long been his ambition to set- 
 lie in this town and to win the daughter of his pre- 
 decessor, Sarah Bass Foster, to whom he was married 
 a year alter his ordination. 
 
 He was an earnest, active and able man, and the 
 church and town still feels and will feel the benefit of 
 his ministry for years to come, if not for all time. 
 
 He was the founder of the Littleton Lyceum, of 
 which an account more in detail will be given later, 
 aud of the first Sunday-school in this town. He died 
 July 25, 1853, in the tweuty-si.Kth year of his minis- 
 try. He was succeeded by Rev. Frederick R. Newell, 
 September, 1854, to November, 1856 ; Rev. Eugene 
 De Normandie, February, 1857, to July, 1863; Rev. 
 Albert B. Vorse, June, 1864, to June, 1869; Rev. 
 David P. Muzzey, October, 1869, to April, 1871; Rev. 
 Timothy H. Eddowes, January, 1872, to December, 
 
20 
 
 LITTLETON. 
 
 1872; Rev. Samuel R. Priest, January, 1873, to Au- 
 gust, 1874; Rev. J. Wingate Winkley, March, 1876, 
 to July, 1882; Rev. William I. Nichols, October, 1884, 
 to November, 1889; Rev. E. J. Prescott, July, 1890. 
 
 In 1841 the society took down their old church and 
 built the present one ou the same spot, the fourth 
 building of the First Congregational Society. In 1882 
 a vestry, with dining-room and kitchen below, were 
 added to the rear of the church. 
 
 Within a fevt years of each other were formed three 
 other religious societies in this town, of which only 
 one has survived; they were the Universalist, the 
 Unionist and the Orthodox Congregational. 
 
 The Universalists held meetings in the Centre 
 School-house and in Chamberlain's Hall i'rom 1830 
 until December, 1846, when they bought at auction 
 the meeting-house the Unionists had built a few years 
 previous, a short distance east of the present Union 
 school- house, on the road between the Centre and Old 
 Common. The meeting-house was burned probably 
 by an incendiary in 1847, after which the society 
 dispensed. 
 
 The Unionists or Millerites were an offshoot of the 
 Baptists, in whose meeting-house William Miller first 
 preached in town. They built the small house before- 
 mentioned in 1840. They had set a time for the de- 
 struction of the world. The time came and pas^sed, 
 the society went out of existence, but the world still 
 remains. 
 
 The Orthodox Congregational Society was formed 
 March 22, 1840, and the church May 14th, of the 
 same year, with thirty-two members, all or nearly all 
 of whom had withdrawn from the town church, now 
 the First Congregational, Unitarian. 
 
 They had held services for some time previously in 
 the hall over the yellow store which stood a short dis- 
 tance west of Dr. R. H Phelps' house, and continued 
 to use it until their present meeting-house was com- 
 pleted in the fall of 1841. 
 
 Their pastors have been Rev. James C. Bryant, Oc- 
 tober, 1840, to March, 1845; Rev. James M. Bacon, 
 October, 1846, to November, 1849; Rev. Daniel H. 
 Babcock, April. 1851, to February, 1853; Rev. Elihu 
 Loomis, October, 1854, to November, 1870; Rev. 
 George Spaulding, November, 1870, to December, 
 1871; Rev. Henry E. Cooley, June, 1872, to October, 
 1874; Rev. George E. Hall, September, 1875, to Feb- 
 ruary, 1877; Rev. William Sewall, March, 1877, to 
 October, 1881; Rev. Nehcmiah Boynlon, October, 
 1882, to September, 1884; Rev. John C. Staples, No- 
 vember, 1884, to November, 1889. 
 
 In 1882 the church was raised, moved back and a 
 vestry and kitchen built in the basement; a new organ 
 was also added and the church re-dedicated in Octo- 
 ber of that year. 
 
 The church and society celebrated their fiftieth an- 
 niversary on May 14th of the present year, 1890, at 
 which time addresses were made by Rev. William G. 
 Tuttle, one of the founders of the church, by several 
 
 of the former ministers and a historical address by 
 George A. Sanderson, to whom the writer is indebted 
 for some of the facts here stated. 
 
 In ancient times a carriage was taxed as a luxury. 
 The returns for the years 1786, '87, '88 and '89 show 
 that in each of those years there were but two in 
 town, both chaise-i, though not recorded as owned by 
 the same persons in evt-ry year. The owners were : 
 Captain Jonathan Davis, Mr. Jeremiah Cogswell, 
 Captain David Lawrence. 
 
 The owners of slaves for the years 1770-71 were : 
 
 Nathan Chase, one slave ; Ciipt«n Leonard Whiting, one slave ; Jo- 
 seph Harwood, two slaves ; Captain D.ivid Lawrence, one slave ; Captain 
 John Kiissell, one slave; Captain Samutjl Preston, one blave ; Simon 
 Tuttle, one slave. 
 
 A public school appears to have been first estab- 
 lished in 1725, for on March 31st of that year the 
 town voted that the selectmen should provide a school- 
 master and " to agree with him," that is, a-t to p.ay. 
 They hired John Powers. The following January 
 (he town again voted that there .should be a school- 
 master and chose a committee consi-iting of Deacon 
 [Caleb] Taylor, Lieutenant Lawrence and Walter 
 Powers to hire the school-master and, in connection 
 with the selectmen, to order where the school was to 
 be kept in the several parts of the town —in private 
 houses, of course. 
 
 There was but one school, and to be fair to all, it 
 kept in various parts of the town, thus usually mov- 
 ing three times during the short time it kept, which 
 was only three or four months aj'ear in all. In 1727 
 an article to see if the town would build school-houses 
 was voted down. In 1732 it was voted to have school 
 four months in one place — that is, not to move at all 
 for that year. 
 
 From 1755 to 1757 Mr. Phillips Payson was the 
 school-master. He was a graduate of Harvard Col- 
 lege in the class of 1754, of which John Hancock was 
 a member. 
 
 From 1758 to 1760 Mr. Samuel Payson was the school- 
 master. He was a Harvard College graduate of 1758. 
 
 In May, 1760, the town voted " to abate Mr. Stephen 
 Shattuck the Rates for his Son's Poll y' last year on 
 condition his Son Goes to college the next year." 
 This was no doubt Benjamin Shattuck, who gradu- 
 ated at Harvard College in 1765. 
 
 Mr. Stephen Shattuck, Jr., was the school-master 
 in 1761 — he may also have been a Harvard graduate, 
 as the class of 1756 contained that name. 
 
 As the town did not build school-houses of its own 
 until the year 1796, the schools, during all the years 
 previous, were kept in buildings owned by private in- 
 dividuals, but it appears that school-houses existed 
 which were no doubt fitted up by their owners and 
 leased to the town. 
 
 In 1772 it was put to vote to see if the town should 
 be supplied with school-houses, " proper allowance 
 being made to the present proprietors of the School- 
 Houses," but the proposition was defeated. 
 
<^ 
 
 V 
 
 ^ 
 
 ?i.LL, 
 
 m^ks: 
 
 FIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH, 
 
 UNITARIAN. 
 
 Engraving made in 1886. 
 
^ ' :ilk ^'^ 
 
LITTLETON. 
 
 21 
 
 It appears to have been quite the custom to have 
 the school-masters of this early period Harvard Col- 
 lege graduates who were studying for a profession, 
 and sometimes undergraduates, as in 1785 Mr. Elisha 
 Gardner taught in the Centre and graduated at Har- 
 vard the following year. 
 
 In 1790 James Green was the school-master. Oc- 
 tober 7, 1795, the town voted to build five school- 
 houses, but in May following reconsidered and voted 
 to build four. The matter was left in the hands of a 
 committee to buy the land and plan the buildings, 
 which was done probably soon after. This, however, 
 did not settle the question of four or five schools, 
 which caused much feeling and seems to have been 
 carried first one way and then another. The contest 
 was between the Centre people and others who wanted 
 a school located there and the residents in the outer 
 portions of the town, who wanted only four, located in 
 the south, east, north and west parts of the town. 
 The matter hung along until February, 1799, when 
 an attempt was made to settle the dispute by leaving 
 out to a committee from neighboring towns the ques- 
 tion whether there .should be four or five schools, or 
 what number ; but the proposition was voted down. 
 
 This, no doubt, came from Centre people, and at 
 the same meeting a motion to appropriate money for 
 a school, to be kept in the old school-house at the 
 Centre, or give certain inhabitants their proportion of 
 the school money was also voted down. 
 
 In May, however, the town voted $100 for "women 
 schools," and to divide it into five equal parts. 
 
 In May, 1801, the advocates of four schools again 
 carried the day, and it was voted not to build a school- 
 house in the Centre. 
 
 In March of the next year the Centre got its por- 
 tion of the money for a " woman school" for summer, 
 but in October the town refused them any. 
 
 In March, 1808, the appropriation for schools was 
 $100 for Grammar School, §150 for Woman School — 
 and the>e meagre sums were more than had been ap- 
 propriated in some, or perhaps any, previous years. 
 
 The four school-houses built in 1796, or there- 
 abouts, were located as follows : The North was on 
 the great road, east of Beaver Brook, and near the 
 long store, which is now a dwelling-house; the East, 
 or Newtown, was at the corner of the road, a short 
 distance south of Mr. Eldridge Marshall's house; the 
 South was near Mr. J. A. Priest's ; the West was 
 near its present location. 
 
 All attempts to get a school permanently located in 
 the Centre failed for many years ; but Rev. Mr. Fos- 
 ter was earnest in his efforts for it, and was not 
 the man to give up in such a contest ; furthermore, 
 the North School became overcrowded, at one time 
 as many as 120 scholars attending in 1820-22, while 
 Mr. Ithamar Beard taught. Finally, on the last day 
 of the year 1821, a vote was carried, 54 to o2, to build 
 a school-house near Daniel Kimball's, now Mr. A. 
 P. Hager's, in the Cen're, another in Nashoba, near 
 
 Shaker Lane, and to move the North, South and 
 Newtown School-houses. This was reconsidered Jan- 
 uary 14th, by a vote of 68 to 53 ; but two weeks later 
 another meeting was held, and ihe erection of the 
 Centre School-house, though on a different spot, and 
 the removal of the North School-house were agreed 
 to, while other plans submitted by the committee 
 were rejected, and the meeting adjourned to the fol- 
 lowing Thursday, January 31st, at which time the 
 whole matter of school -houses w^ s settled as follows : 
 The Centre School-house to be built on the town land 
 nearly opposite the church, where it stood until it 
 was removed to make way for the town hall and li- 
 brary building, in 1886, and the bricks used in the hall ; 
 the Xorth to be moved to very near the spot occupied 
 by the present North School-house; a new one to be 
 built at Nashoba — still standing, but used as a farm 
 building by Mr. Allen Kimball; Newtown to be 
 moved to Jeremiah Tuttle's land at the foot of the 
 hill, and the South to be moved seventy-eight rods, 
 to very near or at the spot where the railroad cross- 
 ing now is. 
 
 The question has been a hard and vexatious one, 
 and wlien finally settled the shrewd suggestion was 
 made to build the houses of brick to prevent their 
 being moved at any future time. It was immediately 
 carried. In 1831 new school-houses were built in the 
 north and south parts of the town, on the old locations, 
 and in 1832 at Newtown. 
 
 In 1831 began the attempts to get a school-house 
 at the Old Common, which were renewed in various 
 forms, sometimes to get a corporate school district 
 and sometimes to have the town build, until 1843, 
 when, in April, it was voted to build at the Common 
 and move the Nashoba School-house, or to sell it and 
 build another. 
 
 This was reconsidered, but again carried, so far as 
 related to the one at the Common. The Nashoba 
 matter was put off, but carried the next year, at March 
 meeting, and a school-house built on or near the 
 present location. At the same meeting a committee 
 was chosen to confer with the directors of the Fitch- 
 burg Railroad about moving the South School-house, 
 as it was on or close by the location of the track. It 
 was afterwards moved a short distance south. 
 
 As we have seen, the location of school-houses has 
 always been a disturbing element in town politics, 
 and any attempted change has called forth repeated 
 and stormy meetings. 
 
 This was the case again shortly after the Civil War, 
 when, after many meetings, it was decided to unite 
 the Centre and Old Common Schools in a graded 
 school, and build the present Union School-house, 
 which was done in 1867. Within the next decade 
 all the other school-houses were rebuilt. Additions 
 were made iu 1888 to the Union School house of a 
 room for the High School, and to the West School- 
 house of another room in order to make a graded 
 school of it. 
 
LITTLETON. 
 
 A few yeara ago a High School was established 
 and kept one term a year, for several years, in the 
 old Centre School-house, which had not been used for 
 school purposes for several years after the erection of 
 the Union School-house. Now the High School is a 
 regularly established school, keeping throughout the 
 whole school year, and with a course of study ar- 
 ranged either to fit for college or to give an English 
 course. 
 
 The present principal is Mr. C. H. Harriman, who 
 was preceded by Mr. Ira A. Jenkin", Mr. Edwin C. 
 Burbank and Mr. William H. Snyder. 
 
 For a few years the I^igh and Centre Grammar 
 Schools were, for lack of accommodations, kept as 
 one school, with Miss Mary G. Tutlle as assistant. 
 
 Running back over some seventy years, the follow- 
 ing have been prominent teachers at various limes in 
 the public schools : 
 
 Miss Josephine Newhall, Miss Nellie M. Jacobs 
 (now Mrs. J. M. Hartwell), Mrs. Ellen F.Johnson, 
 Mr. Albert F. Conant, and his wife (formerly Miss 
 Patten, of Westford), the Misses White (daughters of 
 Rev. W. H. White), Mr. Frank A. Patch, Mr. Laban 
 Warren, Mr. Warren Bolles, Mr. George Stevens. 
 Rev. William G. Tuttle, Mr. Benjamin Kimball, Jr., 
 Rev. Edmund B. Willson (now pastor of the North 
 Society in Salem) Mr. N. B. Edwards, Mr. Henry 
 Prescott, Mr. D. A. Kimball, Mr. Noyes, Mr. Nathan 
 A. Reed, Mr. Otis C. Wright, Mr. Stearns, Mr. Stone, 
 Mr. Ithamer Beard, Mr. Joel Hoar, Mr. M. S. Hager 
 and Mrs. Sophia K. Harwood (formerly Miss Kim- 
 ball). 
 
 The Littleton Lyceum was organized at a meet- 
 ing in the Centre School-house, Monday evening, 
 December 21, 1829, after several preliminary meet- 
 ings had been held, at one of which a constitution 
 had been adopted. The officers chosen were Rev. 
 William H. White, president; Rev. Amasa Sander- 
 son, first vice-president; Hon. Jonathan Hartwell, 
 second vice-president ; Col. Nahum Harwood, treas- 
 urer; Deacon John M. Hartwell, recording secretary; 
 Mr. Joel Hoar, corresponding secretary ; Mr. Ben- 
 jamin Kimball, Deacon Thomas S. Tuttle, Mr. Nathan 
 Hartwell, curators. 
 
 The object of the Lyceum, as stated in the pream- 
 ble of the constitution, was as follows : " We, the sub- 
 scribers, feeling desirous of affording every possible 
 facility for the improvement of our schools, feeling 
 the importance of personal cultivation and the gen- 
 eral diffusion of useful knowledge, and believing these 
 objects can be best accomplished by united and con- 
 tinued efforts, agree to form a society, under the 
 name of ' The Littleton Lyceum.' " 
 
 The founders were the leading men of the town at 
 that time. Rev. Mr. White may be considered the 
 father of the society, and for twenty-three years was 
 its president. 
 
 The literary work of the Lyceum began January 5, 
 1830, with parsing and criticism and reading from 
 
 the North American Review. January 12th there was 
 reading by the first classes of the schools throughout 
 the town, and the reading of a portion of Hall's lec- 
 tures on School-keeping. January 19th began a 
 course of three lectures on Astronomy, by Mr. Abel 
 Fletcher, of Boxborough. Two more evenings were 
 occupied by reading on School-keeping, and one by 
 a debate. 
 
 From that year down to and including the present 
 the Lyceum has continued and flourished each year 
 without a break, the only one of the many lyceums 
 formed about that time throughout the State which 
 has done so without the lapse of a year or more. 
 
 The exercises have changed somewhat, and of late 
 years take more the form of a course of popular lec- 
 tures and concerts, with, occasionally, a debate or an 
 evening occupied by the schools, as a reminder of the 
 original custom and purpose of the Lyceum. There 
 is no permanent fund, and the money for the support 
 of its lectures is raised each year either by the sale 
 of tickets or by popular subscription — the more usual 
 manner — and in that case the lectures are free and 
 public to all.« 
 
 During the winter months, Tuesday evening is, by 
 common consent, assigned and set apart for the Ly- 
 ceum, and rash, indeed, would be anyone who should 
 ajjpoint any other public meeting for that evening. 
 
 Among the names of those who have lectured be- 
 fore the Lyceum are Ralph Waldo Emerson, Dr. 
 Oliver Wendell Holmes, Mr. E. P. Whipple, Rev. 
 James Freeman Clarke, Mr. A. Bronson Alcott, 
 Judge E. R. Hoar, Mr. C. C. Coffin, Brest. C. C. Fel- 
 ton, Wendell Phillips, Mrs. Mary A. Livermore, Col. 
 T. W. Higginson, Rev. E. E. Hale, Rev. Dr. E. H. 
 Chapin, Rev. E. S. Gannett, Hon. N. P. Banks, Hon. 
 Geo. S. Boutwell, Hon. John D. Long, Hon. Geo. B. 
 Loring, Prof. Morse, Col. Thomas W. Knox, Hon. 
 Wm. Parsons and a long list of other prominent men. 
 
 In 1879 the semi-centennial of the Lyceum was 
 celebrated on December 23d. On that occasion Hon. 
 Geo. W. Sanderson presided. An historical address 
 was delivered by Miss Hannah P. Dodge, to whom 
 the writer is indebted as authority, and other addresses 
 were made by Hon. Geo. S. Boutwell, Hon. Geo. 
 Stevens and Rev. Edmund B. Willson. The proceed- 
 ings, including letters from invited guests, were 
 printed in pamphlet form. 
 
 Littleton people are justly proud of this honored 
 institution, which has been so well supported and 
 has .added much to the culture of the town. 
 
 It is interesting to relate the traditions about sev- 
 eral of the large trees which beautify the town and 
 are among the few landmarks connecting us with 
 the past. 
 
 The great elm on Mr. John A. Kimball's land, near 
 the mill-pond, marks the spot where lived Samuel 
 Dudley, the first town clerk, and who-e most excel- 
 lent wife was cruelly accused of witchcraft. 
 
 The two largest elms on Colonel Joseph A. Har- 
 
HON. GEORGE W. SANDERSON. 
 
LITTLETON. 
 
 23 
 
 wood's lawn were set out by his grandfather, Captain 
 Joseph Harwood, the younger, who, when a young 
 man of about seventeen years, dug them up in the 
 woods, carried thetn on his back and set them out 
 where they stand, as well as two others which time 
 has long since removed. 
 
 The elm by the house of Dr. R. H. Phelps, the 
 most beautiful tree in town, was set out by Captain 
 Kidder to serve the practical purposes of hitching- 
 post and shade for his horse when he came to meet- 
 ing. It is estimated to have been set out about the 
 year 1810. 
 
 Captain Kidder kept the Tremont Tavern on the 
 spot where the Baptist parsonage stands, and after- 
 wards built the house owned by Mr. John W. Adams 
 and occupied by him at the time it was burned by 
 Scribner, the incendiary, in 1883. 
 
 The elm tree by the Baptist parsonage was set out 
 by Mrs. Nye, the mother of the late Mr. Thomas Nye. 
 
 The elm tree on the sidewalk between Mr. Everett 
 E. Kimball's and Mr. William Grimes' is the ' Rogers 
 Tree,'' so named by Mrs. Zadoc Rogers, who lived 
 where Mr. Grimes does, and paid some young men 
 five dollars to set it out where she designated. 
 
 The ash tree near the town hall door came from the 
 valley on the west side of Long Pond and was 
 brought on the shoulders of one of the young men of 
 that time. Many of our older residents will remember 
 a very large elm which formerly stood in the rear of 
 the house of Mr. Eugene Felch. That tree was a 
 memento of the counship of John Hartwell and 
 Mary Dix. Mr. Hartwell came along the road one 
 day carrying some small elm trees, and meeting the 
 lady who afterwards became his wife, gave her one 
 which she set out, and which grew to immense size, 
 and under it they both lived and died. The row of 
 maples in the Centre, beginning at the Rogers tree 
 and extending south on Foster Street, was set out 
 in 1861. Littleton's record in the War of the Rebell- 
 ion has not heretofore been fully compiled, as the 
 town has only a partial list of the men who served 
 as representing Littleton. The names here given, 
 however, are believed to include all, both residents 
 and others, accredited to the town as volunteers. 
 
 General Schouler in his " History of Massachusetts 
 in the Rebellion," states that the whole number of 
 men furnished by the town during the war was 117, 
 a surplus of eighteen above the quota, but the follow- 
 ing tifty-six are all the names which appear on the 
 town book of record : 
 
 Charles E. Beard, Warren B. Ball, Daniel Brown, Luther Battles, 
 Joseph A. Butterfield, Marcus CoDaut, [Maj.] Sherman Conant, Edward 
 J. Card, James Costello. George W. Clark, Theodore C. Clark, Isaac N. 
 Dodge, James L. Durant, Hallowell R. Dunham, [Sergt.] James T. Estea, 
 Daniel C. Fletcher, Charles Franklin, William L. Flagg, John Fowley, 
 Warren W. Gilsou, [Sergt.] Francis W. Goodwin, Barney Golden, 
 Edward Golden, John S. Hartwell, Charles H. Holton, Elbridgo H. 
 Jefts, Charles S. Jefts, Sherman H. Jowett, Ahel H. Jones, [Corp.] Geo. 
 W. Knowlton, John M. Kidder, Henry A. Lawrence, George A. Loring, 
 Calvin L. Labhani, [Corp.] Albert B. Marshall, Patrick Moore, Nicholas 
 O'Neal, [Corp.] George H. Pirtch, [Lieut.] Cyrus P. Pickard, [Corp.] 
 
 Herbert E. Preston, Oscar Preston, Ralph W. Parker, James Powers, 
 [Corp.] Charles W. Reed, [Lieut ] George A. Reed, [Sergt.] Albert \V. 
 Robbins, [Corp.] Luther R. Searles. James C. Smith, Nathan E. Tnttle, 
 [Corp.] Adams W. Tuttle, [Corp.] William C. Turner, Allen P. Whit- 
 comb, Nahum H. Wliitcomb, [Corp.] George L. Whitconib, George 
 White, Henry S. Willard. 
 
 The following forty-nine additional names have 
 been collected by the author after careful and diligent 
 search. 
 
 Corp. Edward D. Battles, Henry Bode, Charles P. Buckley, Henry 0. 
 Buruham, Edward Cameron, Hugh Casey, Corp. John Clark, Hugh 
 Connolly, John Curran, George M. Downs, Hensoa Dyson, Edwin C. 
 Field, Thomas Geary, Michael Gubhins, William Haley, John Hawkins, 
 John Henderson, Thomas Jones, Julius Keiser, Bulthasa Kellar, Joseph. 
 Kleehamer, Stephen B. Knights, Charles A Long, Edmund Maunder, 
 Jacob McAtee, Edward C. Slagoreu, Charles McCarthy, Eben S. Mc- 
 Cleary, Alexander McGregor, George C. Monroe. Darius H, C. Nelson, 
 Corp. James O'Brien, Cornelius O'Connor, William Parker, Calvin B. 
 Paige, Asst. Surg. Isaiah L. Pickard, Sergt. Comfort Preston, Austin 
 Richard!*on, Albert J. Bobbins, Frederick Shaffer, Patrick Shorty, 
 George Smith, William Smith, James Sweeney, John D. Sanborn, Homer 
 A. Warren, Antou AVinch, August Vauderhyde, Eduai'd Vausickleu. 
 
 Some of these never resided in town, and were 
 merely engaged to fill the quota, or as substitutes 
 from wherever they happened to come, without regard 
 to residence. The number 117 was no doubt made 
 up by re-enlistments, of which there were several. 
 
 The first town-meeting to consider matters relating 
 to the war was held May 1, 1861, when it wa-i voted to 
 raise by taxation ?1000, and the selectmen were 
 authorized to borrow .$2000, if needed, to pay each 
 soldier belonging to the town SIO a month while in 
 the service, and to provide lor their families. 
 
 in July a committee, consisting of the selectmen, 
 who were John F. Robbins, John Cutter and James 
 A. Parker,' with the addition of Dea. Richard Hall, 
 Francis P. Knowlton, Dea. Thomas S. Tuttle and 
 Benjamin Edwards, were chosen to expend the money 
 appropriated at the previous meeting. 
 
 A year laier, in July, 1862, a bounty of $100 was 
 voted to each volunteer for three years' service, and 
 again, a year later, in August, 1863, the bounty was 
 raised to $125. 
 
 At the same meeting resolutions were passed appro- 
 priate to the death of Nahum H. Whitcomb, of the 
 Sixth Massachusetts Regiment, who was killed at 
 Suifolk, Va., and the town voted to pay the expense 
 of bringing home and interring his remains. 
 
 The town continued recruiting and paying bounties 
 during the remainder of the war, and expended, ex- 
 clusive of State aid, $11,104.33. 
 
 In 1863-64-65 the selectmen were Joseph A. Priest, 
 William Kimball and George W. Sanderson. 
 
 Though a small boy at the time, the writer well re- 
 members the impressive citizens' meeting in Central 
 Hall when the firbt volunteers, enlisted for nine 
 months, took their departure. Speeches were made 
 by prominent citizens, and the soldiers appeared in 
 their new uniforms. 
 
 A Soldiers' Aid Society was formed under the pres- 
 idency of Mrs. S. B. White, widow of Rev. Wm. H. 
 White, and many boxes of clothing, bandages and 
 comforts were forwarded to the seat of war. 
 
24 
 
 LITTLETON. 
 
 Libraries. — One of the earli<=st public libraries in 
 this State was in Littleton, and was established pre- 
 vious to 1827, probably by an association. It wa.s a 
 small collection of books, several being on thef)logy ; 
 there were also Josephus' " History of the Jews," 
 " Gil Bins," with some of Scott's and other novels of a 
 standard character, and was kept on a set of three 
 or four shelves which were placed in the house of the 
 person having them in charge for the time being, 
 and given out to any citizen who called for them. 
 
 At the date above mentioned the library was kept 
 in the house of Mr. Timothy Prescott, who lived in 
 the Rogers house, on the spot where Mr. George 
 Whitconib now lives. The books were sold at auction 
 in 18o4 or '35. About this time was established 
 another library which was in charge of Dea. James 
 Kimball, town clerk in the house now occupied and 
 owned by Mr. A. P. Hager, until the evening of Jan. 
 1, 1847, when the books were sold ai auction and 
 bought by different people in town. Many of the 
 books are still in existence, and the writer has seen 
 one with the original book-plate headed "Littleton 
 Town Library " on the inside cover. 
 
 An agricultural library was also es'ablii^hed, prob- 
 ably after the sale of the town library, and kept an 
 assortment of books on subjects of interest to farmers 
 on some shelves in the Centre store. This library 
 was maintained and owned by an association, and was 
 more of a book club than a public library. 
 
 For several years previous to the foundation of the 
 Reuben Hoar Library the case containing the agri- 
 cultural library, the books of whicli were little, if any 
 read, had been kept in the old brick Centre School- 
 house, which was used as a tovyn office, and had also 
 a vault for town books and records in it. 
 
 These were all turned into the Reuben Hoar Li- 
 brary, together with many books belonging to the 
 town, which were in charge of the selectmen, and had 
 also been kept in the brick school-house. 
 
 This lot of town books contained many valuable 
 sets which had been issued by the State from time 
 to time, such as the Massachu-^etts and Plymouth 
 Colony Records, Hitchcock's " Icbnoiogy of New 
 England," and others. 
 
 We now come to the Reuben Hoar Library. Some 
 time during the fall or early winter of 18S4 a gentle- 
 man who dtsired to remain unknown communicated 
 to Dea. George W. Tuttle his desire to assist in 
 founding a free public library in Littleton, and re- 
 quested Mr. Tuttle to consult with several citizens as 
 to the best way to proceed, at the same time express- 
 ing his willingness to give the sum of $10,000 under 
 certain conditions. 
 
 Mr. Tuttle consulted with Hon. George W. San- 
 derson, Mr. Gardner Prouty, Mr. Shattuck Harlwell 
 and Mr. Nelson 15. Conant, who held several meetings 
 in regard to the matter and communicated with the 
 unknown gentleman through Mr. Tuttle. Before mat- 
 ters were in shape to lay before the town, Mr. Tuttle 
 
 was taken sick with what proved to be his final ill- 
 ness, and in the latter part of the winter the people 
 of this town mourned in his death the loss of a highly 
 respected and valued citizen. Before his death he 
 communicated to Mr. Nelson B. Conant his scn-in- 
 law the name of the gentleman making the offer and 
 negotiations were then carried on through Mr. Conant. 
 
 After deciding on a plan to propose, a citizens' 
 meeting^was called for Monday afternoon, March 23, 
 1885, at which time the donor's offer and conditions 
 were announced as follows : $10,000 to be appropri- 
 ated by the town, $2500 to be raised by subscription, 
 $10,000 to be given by a party (his name to be un- 
 known), on condition that the library be called the 
 Reuben Hoar Library, and that $5000 be invested in 
 books, and $5000 be invested and kept as a fund of 
 which the interest to be expended yearly in books to 
 replenish the library. 
 
 None of the gift of $10,000 to be expended on the 
 building. The books to be kept insured by the town 
 and all expenses attending the running of the library 
 paid by the town. 
 
 The library and its funds to be in charge of seven 
 trustees, viz. : the pastor of the Unitarian Church 
 and one layman, the pastor of the Orthodox Church 
 and one layman, the pastor of the Baptist Church and 
 one layman ; one of the selectmen. 
 
 The plan proposed by the gentlemen who called 
 the meeting, that is the conference committee, was 
 to accept the offer and to build, with the $10,000 to be 
 appropriated by the town, a town-hall and library 
 building combined. 
 
 Some opposition v/as manifested, as many desired 
 to see the plan modified so that the town would not 
 be required to expend so much money on a building, 
 but the plan of tlie conference committee was carried 
 out and resolutions favoring the acceptance of the 
 offer were adopted. 
 
 The committee and others then began a canvass for 
 subscriptions toward the $2500 to be raised in that 
 way, and after sufficient progress had been made a 
 town-meeting was held in Central Hall, Monday, 
 June 8, 1885, to see if the town would accept the con- 
 ditions of the gift and appropriate money for building 
 a hall and library and other matters connected with 
 the matter. After considerable opposition the offer 
 and conditions were accejUed and a building com- 
 mittee chosen consisting of Gardner Prouty, Joseph 
 A. Priest, George W. Sanderson, Edward Frost and 
 Herbert J. Harwood, with instiuctions to report plans 
 and location for a building at an adjourned meeting 
 two weeks later. At that time the committee reported 
 in favor of the location opposite the Unitarian 
 Church, and showed sketches by Harlwell & Richard- 
 son, architects. 
 
 The report was accepted and it was to build, and 
 $10,000 aiipropriatcd. 
 
 The committee then went to work, but care and 
 caution marked its proceedings, which were also pro- 
 
,^l 
 
 ^^3? \«* 
 
 '-^^i^^^^y 
 
HON. JONATHAN HARTWELL 
 
LITTLETON. 
 
 25 
 
 tracted by financial difficulties of the general con- 
 tractor, so that it was two years before the building 
 was completed and furnished. 
 
 For furnishing, the town made a further appropria- 
 tion, which brought the cost of the building up to 
 $11,000 or thereabouts. 
 
 The building was dedicated July 28, 1887, with an 
 oration by ex-Governor John D. Long, addresses by 
 Hon. George S. Boutwell and Hon. Charles H. Alien, 
 a letter from the founder of the Reuben Hoar Library, 
 and other appropriate exercises. 
 
 The founder wrote as follows : 
 
 "About fifty years ago a resident of Littleton became involved and 
 waa obliged to fail in business. 
 
 " Reuben Hoar being his largest creditor was madft assignee. After 
 looking over the assets and finding that if suRicient time was given 
 they might realize just about enough to pay the debts in full, Mr. Hoar 
 said to the man, ' I will make you my agent ; go on, collect and dis- 
 tribute until you have paid all their just due, and if there is nothing 
 left I will furnish you with capital to start again.' 
 
 "For some two years the business was managed with the most rigid 
 economy, during which time Mr. Hoar proved wise in counsel and 
 generous in help. 
 
 " When the estate bad been settled, leaving a sufficient surplus to pay 
 Mr. Hoar his legal and proper commission as assignee, be refused all 
 compensation. 
 
 " It is from the careful use of that small residue by, two fcenerations 
 that the means have been acquired with which to found this Library in 
 honor of Reuben Hoar. " By the doaor." 
 
 In the mean time library trustees had been chosen 
 on July 3, 1885, as follows : Rev. Robert G. Johnson, 
 Rev. William I. Nichols, Rev. John C. Staples, Nelson 
 B. Conant, Herbert J. Harwood, Hon. George W. 
 Sanderson, Miss Hannah P. Dodge, who organized 
 with Mr. Sanderson, chairman; Miss Dodge, secre- 
 tary and Mr. Conant, treasurer ; and proceeded to 
 make a selection of books, and to invest the perma- 
 nent fund. Miss Sarah F. White was chosen librarian, 
 a position which she still honors. 
 
 After purchasing, classifying and arranging about 
 2200 volumes, the library was opened to the public a 
 few days after the dedication of the building. 
 
 A printed catalogue was issued in December, 1889, 
 and at that time the library had grown to about 4500 
 volumes. The benefits of the library are fully appre- 
 ciated by the citizens of the town, and there are few 
 people of eligible age who do not either take out 
 books or frequent the periodical table, so that the 
 total circulation of books is over 7000 a year in a 
 population of 1000. 
 
 The library is open on Wednesday and Saturday 
 afternoons and Saturday evenings. A fine oil por- 
 trait of the late Reuben Hoar, in whose honor the 
 library was named, hangs upon the wall of the read- 
 ing-room, the gift of his daughters, — Mrs. Adelbert 
 Mead, of West Acton, and Mrs. Isaac Wright, of Har- 
 vard. 
 
 The library also received a bequest of $1000 by the 
 will of Augustus K. Fletcher, formerly of this town, 
 and has also been favored with many gifts of books 
 and some pictures, as well as a valuable manuscript 
 collection of historical and genealogical matter be- 
 
 longing to the late Samuel Smith and given by his 
 heirs. 
 
 The town is also the owner of five shares in the 
 Boston Athenaeum Library, presented many years ago 
 by Dr. Shattuck, of Boston, a relative of the first 
 minister of the town, by the use of which books 
 can be taken out by Littleton people. 
 
 The three churches have each a library of Sunday- 
 school books, and that of the Unitarian Church is 
 also quite general in its character, and contains books 
 for people of all ages. 
 
 Littleton is principally a farming town, but has at 
 the depot village a factory for canning and pickling 
 fruit and vegetables, operated by E. T. Cowdrey & 
 Co., the plant being owned by a company of Littleto 
 men. There are two saw and grist-mills owned and 
 operated by Fred C. Hartwell, — one at the depot and 
 the other at the old Warren mill-site. At the Com- 
 mon Village are located the factory for manufactur- 
 ing elastic webs and suspenders and the apple evap- 
 orator, both owned and operated by Conant & 
 Hioughton. Conant & Co. have stores at the Common 
 and depot. Thacher & Hazen, a new firm, recently 
 succeeding A. W. & W. H. Sawyer, at the depot and 
 C. C. Hildreth at the Centr'e. 
 
 A few years since a large and costly brick factory 
 was built near the depot by the Avery Lactate Co., 
 for the manufacture, by a new proces.s, of lactic acid, 
 but the company failed and thebuilding and machin- 
 ery stand idle, having been sold for taxes. 
 
 About the time of the War of the Revolution there 
 was a factory for dressing cloth on the brook near the 
 house of Peter S. Whitcomb ; it was owned by a stock 
 company, which had, in 1779, seventeen shareholders, 
 mostly residents. 
 
 The population of Littleton in 1776 was 918; in 
 1860, 1063; and in 1885, 1067. The number of polls 
 is 305 and the valuation $849,273. 
 
 The town has been represented in the State Senate 
 by Rev. Edmund Foster, Hon. Jonathan Hartwell, 
 Hon. Joseph A. Harwood and Hon. George W. San- 
 derson, and in the Executive Council by Hon. Joseph 
 A. Harwood. 
 
 The State engineer of the Hoosac Tunnel, com- 
 pleted in 1875, was Benjamin D. Frost, of this town. 
 
 Taverns have been kept in Littleton by Samuel 
 Hunt, probably near Peter S. Whitcomb's house, 
 mention of which is made in the early records of 
 meetings held there as early as 1722 ; also by one 
 Lawrence, probably Samuel, in the south part of the 
 town as early as 1768, in the house now occupied by 
 David Hall, of which previous mention has been 
 made ; by John Fox and after his death by his wife, 
 in the Centre about the time of the French and Indian 
 War ; also by Capt. Leonard Whiting in the Centre, 
 previous to the Revolution ; by William Henry Pren- 
 tice, in the Centre, where Everett E. Kimball lives, 
 during the Revolution ; by Samuel Gilbert and after- 
 wards about the beginning of this century by Captain 
 
26 
 
 LITTLETON. 
 
 Kidder, at the Common, called the Tremont House, 
 which stood where the Baptist parsonage now is — 
 the building continued to be used as a hotel until it 
 was struck by lightning and burned in 1845; by 
 Simeon Proctor, where Solomon S. Flagg now lives; 
 by Madison Loring, who succeeded Captain Kidder, 
 at the Common, in the house afterwards occupied as 
 a dwelling by the late John W. Adams; by Samuel 
 Smith, on the spot where Albert F. Conant's house 
 stands, and later, in the same building, by J. M. Col- 
 burn, William Chamberlain, Boynton Needham and 
 others, and last by George D. Brown, who owned the 
 place when it was burned, in 1878, but had not kept 
 it open to the public for several years previous. 
 
 William L. Mitchel now keeps a public-house at 
 the Common and has for several years. 
 
 As before stated, the earliest cemetery in town was 
 at Nashoba, and was plowed up a number of years 
 ago. The second and oldest of the two present ceme- 
 teries, the one at the Common, was laid out in 1721 and 
 is described as having for its "East Corner an oak 
 tree by King St. so called." The other cemetery was 
 purchased in ISOl, but was used only for the inter- 
 ment of paupers until the year 1812. 
 
 The following epitaphs" are to be found in the old 
 cemetery at the Common :— 
 
 *^ Memento ilori. 
 
 Here lies the Body of Dr. Enoch Dole, of Lancaster, M 33 yre. 5 moa. 
 
 & 3 days, he unfortunately fell with 3 others y« 9th of Mar, 1776, by a 
 
 cannon Ball from our cruel & unnatural Foe3 y* British Troops while on 
 
 Lis Duty on Dorchester Point. 
 
 No 1 
 
 !giv 
 
 ITnceremoniouB fate I 
 A sudden rush from life's meridian joys I 
 A wrench from all we are from all we love, 
 
 "What a change from yesterday I 
 Thy darling hope so near (Long labored prize). 
 Oh, how ambition flushed Thy glowing cheek — ambition truly great 
 Of virtuous praise ; 
 And Oh I y« last (what can wuid express thought reach), y* last, last 
 silence of a Iriend. 
 
 Meaning his entrance into Boston which 
 jvhich his heart was much set." 
 
 took Place & on 
 
 *' Here lyes the body of Isaac Powers, 
 One of those sweet and pleasant flowers, 
 "Who in his Lifetime Lived well, 
 But God did toll his mournful bell ; 
 Let this be a call unto the rest 
 When Gcd doth take from us the best 
 ■Who was a pattern to us all. 
 But God can give a louder call 
 All earthly parents now behold ; 
 The price of Grace is more than gold. 
 Prepare to meet your children first 
 At the Resurrection of the Just. 
 Who died December 15, 1729, in the 2Sth year of his age.* 
 
 "Affliction sore, long time 1 bore 
 Physicians was in vain, 
 
 Till God did ple^ise 
 
 And Death did seize 
 To case me of my pain." 
 
 ' As you are now, so once was I, 
 
 Kcjoicing in my bloom, 
 As I am now, you soon must be. 
 Dissolving in the tomb." 
 
 '* Present useful 
 Absent wanted. 
 Lived desired 
 And died lamented.' 
 
 BIOGRAPHICAL. 
 
 HON. JOSEPH ALFRED HARWOOD. 
 
 In Littleton the number of old families living on 
 farms which have been handed down from sire to son 
 for many generations is remarkable, and among the 
 oldest is the Harwood family, of which Hon. Joseph 
 A. Harwood is the head. 
 
 Nathaniel Harwood, of English origin, was living 
 in Boston in 1(355, whence he removed to Concord. 
 From there his son Peter and grandson. Captain Jo- 
 seph Harwood, moved to Littleton and bought in 1737 
 the estate upon which the family now live. 
 
 Their first residence was in a lot since grown up to 
 woods near the new road to Xewtown from Littleton 
 depot, and some half-mile east of Mr. Harwood's 
 house. 
 
 The cellar-hole may yet be seen and the old well 
 filled with stones, while a short distance ^away is a 
 finespring which comes up through a hollow log set in 
 the ground no doubt some 150 years ago. About 1754 
 a house was built near the present one by Captain Jo- 
 seph Harwood, and his son. Captain Joseph Harwood, 
 Jr., then a young man, set out the elm trees, of which 
 two large ones are still standing, and under which 
 Mr. Harwood's grandchildren, the seventh genera- 
 tion on the place, to-day play. 
 
 The Harwoods have always been prominent in town 
 affairs, and have been pioneers in all movements of 
 reform and improvement. 
 
 Colonel Nahum Harwood, the father of the subject 
 of this sketch, was one of the fir.st Abolitionists, and a 
 co-worker with Garrison and Phillips. He was also 
 one of the projectors of the Fitchburgh Railroad. 
 His wife, Mrs.« Sophia Kimball Harwood, who lived 
 to the advanced age of a few days less than ninety- 
 four years, used to relate many incidents of the olden 
 time, among them how she wore crape, when a girl, for 
 the death of George Washington, reminiscences of 
 the last slave owned by the Harwood family, etc. 
 
 The old house above referred to as built in 1754, 
 was destroyed by fire in 1874, together with a great 
 number of relics and heirlooms. 
 
 It was one of those substantial square white houses, 
 with an immense chimney in the centre, standing un- 
 der the broad elms on the sunny southern slope of a 
 hill, the style of house which, though now becoming 
 
LITTLETON. 
 
 27 
 
 scarce, has always been the typical New England 
 farm-house. 
 
 From its windows were seen the smoke of the burn- 
 ing of Charlestown and the battle of Bunker Hill, 
 and in its cellar the frightened inhabitants took ref- 
 use during the "dark day" of 1780. Many slaves 
 were born and raised in the house, but the slavery 
 was nsver like the Southern slavery, and the Har- 
 woods were among the first Abolitionists. 
 
 Here was born Joseph Alfred Harwood, March 26, 
 1S27. He attended the district school and afterward 
 the academies at WestCord, Groton, and Exeter, New 
 Hampshire. It was intended to send him to college, 
 but his father dying when he was fifteen years old, he 
 came home to take charge of the farm. 
 
 Many old heads predicted failure for a boy with a 
 large farm on his hands, and a fondness for fine horses 
 and cattle, but the boy had a level head and managed 
 well. He made many improvements on the farm 
 " making two blades of grass grow where one grew be- 
 fore," draining old bogs and making them produce, 
 heavy crops of fine English hay, plowing up huckle- 
 berry pastures and planting orchards, and similar 
 things. Meantime he paid his bills, rent and interest 
 on the portions of the form belonging to the other 
 heirs, and finally bought and paid for the whole. He 
 found time to teach school for a number of winters, 
 and was noted for his good discipline, and the ease 
 with which he maintained it. A school in a neigh- 
 boring town, containing a number of full-grown schol- 
 ars, men in size, who had driven away two or three 
 teachers, and vowed vengeance on the next who 
 should come, was turned over to Mr. Harwood, when 
 he was only seventeen years of age, to complete a 
 term. He held his place without resorting to harsh 
 measures, and left the school orderly, obedient and 
 respectful. 
 
 The stock on Mr. Harwood's farm has always, since 
 under his management, been of the best. He intro- 
 duced among his cattle the first thoroughbred animals 
 ever brought into Littleton, and by frequent additions 
 of new blood has not only improved his own herd, but 
 the stock on all the neighboring farms. He devoted 
 him.self almost exclusively to agriculture until 1868, 
 when, in partnership with his younger brother, Na- 
 hum, ucder the name of J. A. & N. Harwood, he 
 commenced the manufacture of leather board, their 
 factory being at North Leominster, on the Nashua 
 River, and their salesroom iu Boston. The great 
 Boston fire of November, 1872, found the firm mov- 
 ing a large stock of goods from one store to another ; 
 both were burned, but by good fortune and good 
 judgment combined — for they always go together — 
 their insurance was divided among a number of out- 
 of-town companies and was all good. 
 
 During the panic of 1873 the firm stood its ground, 
 while many of its neighbors succumbed. 
 
 Ou April 1, 1884, the Leominster factory was de- 
 stroyed by fire, causiug a loss to the firm and a fur- 
 
 ther indirect loss by crippling the business during 
 rebuilding, but by good management all liabilitie-i 
 were promptly met and the business continued. A 
 fine new factory was built, the firm was made into a 
 corporation under Massachusetts laws, by the name 
 of the Harwood Manufacturing Company, and has 
 continued the same business, branching out somewhat 
 in the manufacture of patent fibre chair-seats and 
 chairs, and settees for churches, theatres and halls. 
 Joseph A. Harwood is president and treasurer. 
 
 Li all matters, both of public and private business, 
 Mr. Harwood's policy has been liberal and expan- 
 sive, encouraging all improvements such as new roads, 
 public buildings or any project which will increase 
 the business and prosperity of his town, and also ia 
 the improvement and adornment of his estate. After 
 the old house was burned he built a large and ele- 
 gant new one on the top of the hill, a few rods from 
 where the old one stood. The wood-cut opposite 
 gives an accurate idea of the house and surroundings. 
 The view from the house in all directions is very fine, 
 covering the park with its walks, drives and ponds, 
 all planned and laid out by Mr. Harwood, who is in- 
 tensely fond of landscape gardening, beyond which 
 the eye passes over a large expanse of hills and valleys 
 to Mounts Wacliusett, Monadnock, Watatick and the 
 Peterboro' hills. 
 
 Mr. Harwood has in his farm about 240 acres, a 
 considerable part of which he has added within a few 
 years by the purchase of land extending in the direc- 
 tion of Littleton depot, on which is located the 
 United States Cittle Quarantine Station, which was 
 moved from Waltham in 1885, as aresult of his efforts 
 and against much political opposition stimulated by 
 those who wanted it elsewhere. 
 
 Mr. Harwood was postmaster of Littleton for 
 about twenty years, and during the greater part 
 of the time accommodated the citizens by sending 
 the mail at his own expense to sub-offices at the 
 Centre and Old Common, previous to the establish- 
 ing of aregu'ar office at Littleton Common. Through 
 his influence a telegraph office was established in con- 
 nection with the post-office, which could be done 
 only in that way, and by his bearing a part of the 
 expense of a clerk for both offices. 
 
 In 1873 Governor Washburn appointed Mr. Har- 
 wood on his staff, and he was re-appointed by Lieut. 
 Governor Talbot when acting Governor for the unex- 
 pired term after the election of Governor Washburn 
 to the United States Senate. Col. Harwood was 
 elected to the State Senate in 1875 and re-elected the 
 following year and was an active, practical and 
 influential legislator. He served in his first year as 
 chairman of the Committee on Military Affairs, and 
 also on the Committees on Agriculture, and on En- 
 grossed Bills, and in the following year was chairman 
 of the Committee on Agriculture and a member of 
 the Coramitttee on Public Charitable Institutions. 
 
 An important matter that v/~s carried through the 
 
28 
 
 LITTLETON. 
 
 Senate largsly through his influence and efforts was 
 the building of the State Prison at Concord. During 
 his second term occurred the celebrat'on of the Lex- 
 ington and Concord Centennials, and Mr. Harwood 
 was made chairman of the joint special committee 
 having the whole matter in charge for the Legisla- 
 ture, including the entertainment of President Grant 
 and his cabinet. 
 
 General Grant, on his return to Washington, wrote 
 him an autograph letter as follows: — 
 
 "Executive Mansio.v, Wasuinoton, Apl. 2T, 1876. 
 " Hon. J. A. Harwood, Chairman Legislative Committee. 
 
 " Dear Col. : — Permit me tltrough you — the chairman of the com- 
 mittee of the Mass. Legislature, appointed to meet the Cabinet and 
 myself on the occasion of the late centennial celebration of the bat- 
 tles of Concord — Lexington, and convey to us the invitation of the State 
 to be its guests for the time— to tender my thanks, and the thanks of the 
 accompanying Cabinet Ministers for the courtesies received from his 
 Kxcellency the Governor of the state, and staff, your committee and 
 citizens generally. Nothing was left undone to make our short stay in 
 the state most pleasant. M'ith great respect, 
 
 *' Your obt. svt., 
 
 " U. S. Gkant." 
 
 At the expiration of Mr. Harwood's second term in 
 the Senate, he was elected to the Executive Council 
 from the Sixth Councilor Di.strict, and served in that 
 capacity three years — the first two in Governor Rice's 
 and the last in Governor Talbot's. 
 
 The first year he was on the Committees on Par- 
 dons, on Penal Institutions, on Military Affairs and 
 chairman of the Committee on Accounts; in the two 
 succeeding years he was on the two first-named com- 
 mittees, also on the Committee on Railro.ads and the 
 Hoosac Tunnel, and chairman of the Committee on 
 Military Affairs. During his third year he was one 
 of the senior members of the Council and was con- 
 sidered Governor Talbot's right-hand man in that ad- 
 ministration, which has been celebrated for its careful 
 and business-like management and strict integrity. 
 
 In 1879 and again in 1882, Mr. Harwood was a 
 prominent candidate for the Republican nomination 
 lor Lieutenant-Governor, and in the convention of 
 the former year received 181 votes and of the latter 
 283. 
 
 He has always been a staunch Republican, and 
 prides himself on having invariably voted the straight 
 ticket in both State and national affairs. 
 
 In his whole career, both in business and politics, 
 determined persistence has marked his course and 
 has been tlie cause of his success. 
 
 He is now president and treasurer of the Harwood 
 Manufacturing Company, president of the Live Stock 
 Insurance Company, director in the Mutual Reserve 
 Fund Life Association of New York, trustee of the 
 New England Agricultural Society, trustee of the 
 Middlesex Agricultural Society, trustee of Wcstford 
 Academy and trustee of the Massachusetts Agricultu- 
 ral College. He has always been an active member 
 of the Unitarian Society and Cburch, and was at one 
 time a president of the North Middlesex Conference. 
 
 In pergonal appearance Mr. Harwood is tall, with 
 
 iron gray hair and beard, a full face and a sharp eye; 
 he walks with a long stride and very fast. He is very 
 cordial in manner and makes and holds many friends. 
 
 In 1852 Mr. Harwood married Lucy Maria Hart- 
 well, of Littleton, daughter of Hon. Jonathan and 
 Elizabeth Briard (Walker) Hartwell. 
 
 Two sons have been born to them — Herbert Joseph, 
 who graduated from Harvard College in 1877, and is 
 now associated with his father in business, also, with 
 his wife and five children, living with his iTither and 
 mother at the old place, and Edward Alfred, who 
 died in infancy. 
 
 WILLIAM KIMBALL. 
 
 William Kimball, son of Deacon James and Rachel 
 Hartwell, Kimball was born in Littleton December 
 6, 1817. The greater part of his life was spent in his 
 native town, in which, for about twenty years of his 
 early manhood, he kept a store, and during a portion 
 of this time was postmaster. For many years he was 
 justice of the peace. In 1845 he married Mary Adams 
 Lawrence. Of their six children, four survive, — 
 George A., William L., Myron A. and Mrs. Mary K. 
 Harlow, the first and last living in Somerville, Mass., 
 William L. and Myron A. residing in Littleton. 
 
 At the semi-centennial of the church of which Mr. 
 Kjmball had been a member, his pastor, in alluding 
 to him, said: "His pleasant countenance was an in- 
 spiration." 
 
 The following resolution from the town records 
 shows the esteem in which he was held by the citi- 
 zens : 
 
 " Resolved; That in the lamented death of William Kimball we greatly 
 mourn our loss of an exeniplary and honored citizen, an experienced, 
 efficient and upright olficial. Living most of his life of sixty-six years 
 in his native town, by his sterling traits of character, his kindly spirit, 
 his habitual courtesy, his modest manliness, his firm principles and 
 proved integrity, his genuine and ready support of the public interests, 
 and his earnest, simple. Christian faith and life, he gained and held the 
 coutidence and esteem of his townsmen, as shown in the continuous and 
 unanimous choice of him to be their town clerk for more than a quarter 
 of a century." 
 
 It was said by one who knew him well : " He walked 
 among men one of earth's noblemen, whose integrity 
 was so staunch and whose honor so true that there 
 was none to point the finger of scorn at him or to im- 
 peach his honesty.'' 
 
 In 18G9 he married Mrs. Lucy M. Houghton, young- 
 est daughter of John Goldsmith, of Littleton. He 
 died October 14, 1884, aged sixty-six years. 
 
 DKACOJf JAMES KIMBALL. 
 
 In presenting a sketch of the life of Deacon James 
 Kimball, it seems suitable to prefix some account of 
 his father, Doaco-) Dar.iel Kimball, the progenitor of 
 the Kimball family in Littleton: 
 
 Daniel Kimball was born ia Haverhill, Massachu- 
 setts, July 14, 1751. Soon after his removal to Lit- 
 tleton the Revolutionary War broke out. He entered 
 
SAMUEL SMITH 
 
LITTLETON. 
 
 29 
 
 the army, in •nbich he soon obtained the rank of 
 lieutenant. 
 
 lu 1779 he married Lucy Button, of Littleton. Of 
 their twelve children, three died in infancy; the re- 
 inainderall married and settled in Littleton. The 
 following are their names : 
 
 Daniel, James, Benjamin, Jesse, Lucy (Kimball) 
 Mead, John, Sophia (Kimball) Harwood, Sebia 
 (Kimball) Goldsmithand Rebecca (Kimball) Fletcher. 
 
 At the present time (1890) more than sixty worthy 
 descendants of Deacon Daniel Kimball reside in Lit- 
 tleton, and more than 125 are scattered through the 
 States from Vermont to California. He died in 1813, 
 aged sixty-two years. 
 
 In the archives of the town library may be found a 
 funeral sermon preached by Rev. Edmund Foster, in 
 which his character is delineated. 
 
 Deacon James Kimball, second son of Deacon Dan- 
 iel Kimball, was born in Littleton in 1783. 
 
 He married, in 1807, Rachel Hartwell, of Littleton. 
 Of their ten children, two — Sophia (Kimball) Hurter, 
 of Jacksonville, Florida, and Elizabeth (Kimball) 
 Stevens, for many years a resident of Lowell — are still 
 living. 
 
 James Kimball was, while quite a young man, prom- 
 inent in town and other public interests. He was one 
 of the pioneers of the anti-slavery and temperance 
 movements. From 1838 to 1851 he was town clerk. 
 
 He was an interested and active member of the Ly- 
 ceum from its beginning: a society which for more 
 than half a century has had an important educational 
 influence in the town. 
 
 He was for many years chosen as one of the Board 
 of Selectmen, and for a considerable period repre- 
 sented the town in the State Legislature. He was 
 deacon of the Orthodox Congregational Church from 
 its organization (which occurred in his own house), in 
 18^0, to his death. He had previously held the office 
 of deacon in the Unitarian Church. 
 
 His f.econd wife was Mrs. Mary B. Harris. 
 
 He died in 1869, aged eighty-six years. His life 
 fully warranted the estimate of his character shown 
 by his father in the advice given his children upon 
 his death-bed : " My children, take James for an ex- 
 ample.'' 
 
 JOHN GOLDSMITH. 
 
 John Goldsmith was a native of Acton, Mass. He 
 was a son of John and Maria (Houghton) Goldsmith, 
 — the former being a native of Littleton and the lat- 
 ter of Harvard. It is supposed he was a lineal de- 
 scendant of the Goldsmith family that was of the 
 early settlers of the country, and which tradition 
 states was of Irish descent. On the town records of 
 Wenham is the statement that in 1659 Richard Gold- 
 smith was taxed for the salary of the minister one 
 pound, tifteen shillings. In 1731 Richard Goldsmith 
 married Hannah Dodge, of Wenham, and in the old 
 burying-ground at Littleton some ancient grave- 
 
 stones mark the spot where their ashes repose. Mr. 
 Goldsmith was also a lineal descendant of Rev. Ben- 
 jamin Shattuck, first minister of Littleton. The 
 Goldsmith family moved from Littleton to Harvard, 
 and John, the subject of this sketch, having been de- 
 prived of his father, through accident, in early life, 
 was put in charge of his grandfather, who brought 
 him up. In 1818 he was married at Littleton to 
 Sebia Kimball, a daughter of Deacon Daniel and 
 Lucy (Dutton) Kimball, both of Littleton. In early 
 manhood he engaged in farming, and owned and oc- 
 cupied for sixty years the homestead where he died. 
 His estate is situated about a half-mile easterly of 
 Littleton Common. It is beautifully located, and the 
 buildings and grounds indicate the thrift of their 
 former proprietor. Mr. Goldsmith was a fine type of a 
 New England farmer. He was industrious, economi- 
 cal and attended strictly to the interests of his farm. 
 He made a business of farming, by which, together 
 with safe investments, he acquired a large property. 
 As a citizen he was public-spirited and had the con- 
 fidence of his fellow-townsmen, who many times 
 elected him to positions of honor and trust. He was 
 a prominent member of the Unitarian Church, a con- 
 stant attendant on its services and a regular contrib- 
 utor to its support. At his decease he left a sum of 
 money for the benefit of the Littleton public schools, 
 and the appreciation of the gift by the town is set 
 forth by the following resolutions : 
 
 "Whrreas, Our lamented townsman, the late John Goldsmith, be- 
 queathed to the town of Littleton the * Sum of Fifteen Hundred dollars,' 
 to be holden and invested by the Selectmen and their successors, as 
 trustees, the income of which he desired should be e.\pended annually 
 for education in the Common Schools of said Littleton — 
 
 "Voted, That the citizens of the town hereby expres-s and record their 
 grateful recognition of the value of Mr. Goldsmith's long life among 
 them as that of an upright and honored citizen, of diligent industry, of 
 souud integrity, and strict fidelity to every trust; of great wisdom in 
 council, and excellence of heart, whose memory we cherish with just 
 pride and whose sterling character and example we commend as worthy 
 of personal emulation." 
 
 Mr. Goldsmith died at Littleton February 14, 1883, 
 atthe age of eighty-seven. His fiimily, beside his wife, 
 consisted of two sons, John and Daniel, both of whom 
 died unmarried, and three daughters, Sophia, Julia 
 and Lucy Maria, the latter being the only child now 
 living. Sophia married Francis Conant; Lucy 
 Maria, the youngest daughter, married Daniel P. 
 Houghton, of Harvard, and later William Kimball, 
 son of Deacon James Kimball, of Littleton, and now 
 resides at her father's late residence. 
 
 OTIS MANNING. 
 
 Otis Manning was born at Littleton, Massachu- 
 setts, October 31, 1805, and was a son of Jona- 
 than and Lydia (Howard) Manning, both natives 
 of Chelmsford. His education was obtained at the 
 district school, with the exception of one term 
 spent at the Westford Academy. In early life he 
 learned the wheelwright's trade, and for more than 
 
30 
 
 LITTLETON. 
 
 half a century he followed this vocation, working 
 moat of the time in a sliop that is still standing near 
 his present residence, which is a little northerly of 
 Littleton Common, December 10, 1833, he was mar- 
 ried at Westford to Miss Ann Crosby Carter, daughter 
 of Ezra and Anna (Jaquith) Carter. He has one 
 child, Ann Maria Manning. 
 
 Mr. Maaniiig is a Kepublican, but has never ac- 
 tively participated in political affairs, except to per- 
 form the ordinary duties of citizenship. In matters 
 of reform he has always been on the right side — being 
 an Abolitionist in the days of slavp.ry, and an advo- 
 cate of temperance in the early days of that reform. 
 
 When almost everybody was accustomed to use 
 some alcoholic liquor, he was a total abstainer, and 
 this practice he has followed through life. lu his 
 church relations he is a staunch Congregationalist. 
 In early life he joined the church in Westford, and 
 for some years was superintendent of its Sunday- 
 school. He was one of the original members of the 
 Orthodox Church in Littleton, which was organized 
 May 14, 1840. Since the formation of this church he 
 has held the office of deacon, and for years served as 
 clerk and Sabbath-school superintendent. As a 
 church officer he has been faithful and efficient, and 
 as a Christian his life lias been exceptionally com- 
 mendable through these many long years of service 
 for the Master. He has but rarely been absent from 
 his place at church on the Sabbath, or at the weekly 
 church meeting ; and has been a ready and willing 
 contributor for the maintenance of the institutions of 
 his faith. Not only has he been devoted to the 
 spreading of the Gospel at home and in his own land, 
 but he has been much interested in the propagation 
 of it in other lands. He has been a firm and substan- 
 tial friend of the great missionary societies, and dur- 
 ing a long life he has spent but few nights away from 
 his native town except to attend religious conferences 
 and conventions. 
 
 Few lives have perhaps been more exemplary than 
 his; and in the quiet retirement of old age he still 
 retains a lively interest in the causes that he has long 
 helped maintain. He resides with his daughter, and, 
 with the exception of the infirmities incident to ad- 
 vanced age, he is still in the enjoyment of robust 
 health. 
 
 BARNABAS DODGE. 
 
 Barnabas Dodge, an old and respected citizen of 
 Littleton, was of English stock, the ancestor of the 
 American branch of the family, William Dodge, be- 
 ing among the company that landed at Salem in 
 1629, under the leadership of John Endicott. 
 
 His father, John Dodge, served in the War of the 
 K^jvolution, under his father. Captain John Dodge. 
 His maternal grandfather, Barnabas Dodge, was a 
 captain in Colonel Gerrish's regiment, which was in 
 service at the battle of Bunker Hill. 
 
 Mr. Dodge was born in Wenham, Massachusetts; 
 in 1705. His father was a farmer, but in his youth 
 had made several voyages to foreign countries, as was 
 common with the young men in the coast towns at 
 that time. The family came to Littleton in 1818, hav- 
 ing bought the estate known as the Captain Cogswell 
 farm, In the north part of the town. In his youth Mr. 
 Dodge taught a district school. While in this em- 
 ployment he met, as, his pupil, Miss Sarah Corning, 
 of I5everly, who in 1820 became his wife. Mr. Dodge 
 cultivated and greatly improved his farm, never seek- 
 ing public life or honors. It has been said of the 
 Dodge family, that they do not seek public office, but 
 when it is conferred upon them, that they perform its 
 duties with ability and fidelity. This was true of the 
 subject of this sketch. He he d various town offices, 
 school committee, selectman, &c. He was the father 
 of ten children, who lived to adult age. The eldest 
 daughter became a teacher. After several terms in 
 the district schools of Littleton, she became succes- 
 sively principal of the Townsend Female Seminary, 
 whence she had graduated ; Oread Institute, Wor- 
 cester; Codman Hill Young Ladies' School, Dorches- 
 ter ; Ladies' Department Kalamazoo College, Michi- 
 gan, and of Colby Academy, New London, New 
 Hampshire. She was superintendent of schools in 
 Littleton four years after her return to her native 
 town in 1877. Another daughter was for several 
 years teacher in the Winchester High .School. She 
 married Rev. E. B. Eddy, of Calais, Maine, and died 
 in 1879. Two of the sons are in business in Cam- 
 bridge; two remain in Littleton. Three of the 
 daughters and four sons are still (1890) living. 
 
 Mr. Dodge was a man of more than ordinary intel- 
 ligence, was a diligent reader, and assisted in forming 
 two small town libraries, which, unfortunately, sur- 
 vived but a few years. His older children remember 
 the interest which all felt when the father brought 
 home a new book from the library, and their enjoyment 
 of the winter evenings when he would read aloud from 
 these, or the family newspaper, as they worked around 
 the cheerful fire-place, filled high with glowing logs, 
 over the ruddy heaps of living coals beneath. Mr. 
 Dodge was an honest man. No one could ever bring 
 against him charges of cheating or meanness in trade. 
 He was truthful, sympathetic and a faithful friend. 
 He was interested iu th'e affairs of the.town and of the 
 state and the nation, never seeking to control them, 
 but always on the side of what he believed to be the 
 right. He died in 1873. His wife survived him fif- 
 teen years, dying at the old homestead, still in posses- 
 sion of the family, to which she had corneas a youth- 
 ful bride almost seventy years before. 
 
 GARDNER I'ROUTY. 
 
 Gardner Prouty was born at Spencer, Worcester 
 County, Massachusetts, Se])tember 4, 1817, and was 
 the sou of Gardner and Ruth (How) Trouly, both of 
 
C/C'^7'€/.^XJZ^^ 
 
LITTLETON. 
 
 31 
 
 Spencer. He attended the common schools of his 
 native town till about seventeen years of age, when 
 he went to Westminster, where he spent one term at 
 the Academy. After leaving school he learned the 
 carpenter's trade, at which he worked about six years. 
 In 1847 he went to Boston, and for a time engaged in 
 the ice shipping business. Afterwards he was in the 
 business of wharfinger, in which he continued till 
 January 1, 18S9. In 1864 he went to Littleton and 
 purchased the place where he still resides. His house 
 is pleasantly situated on the main street at Littleton 
 Common; and connected with it is a farm of sixty- 
 four acres, the care of which has afforded him ample 
 opportunity for exercise since his retirement from his 
 former business. June 3, 1851. Mr. Prouty was mar- 
 
 ried at Boston, by Rev. Thomas Starr King, to Clara 
 D. Wheelock, of Calais, Vermont. Miss Wheelock 
 was a daughter of Mr. and Mrs. Welcome Wheelock, 
 formerly of Charlton, Worcester County, Massachu- 
 setts. He has one child, Gardner W., who is married 
 and lives in Littleton. Mr. Prouty is a Democrat, 
 and was a delegate to the Presidential Convention 
 held in New York in 1868. He has taken an active 
 part in the public affairs of Littleton, having been 
 selectman and assessor seven years, and overseer of 
 the poor six years, and five years chairman of these 
 boards. For several years he was also a member of 
 the School Committee, and was moderator of the 
 annual town-meeting of Littleton twenty years. His 
 paternal ancestor came to Spencer from Scituate. 
 
^ 
 
SIGN OF THE LAWRENCE TAVERN, 
 
 Historical Sketch of Littleton, Mass. 
 
 BY HERBERT J. HARWOOD. 
 
 NOW READY. 
 
 Reprinted from the History of Middlesex County with the additicjn 
 of many illustrations. The matter tries to give, in a condensed and 
 readable form, an outline of Littleton history from A. D. 1654 to recent 
 times. 
 
 Particular attention has Ijeen paid to the ancient Nashobah Plantation 
 of Praying Indians, whose story is interesting and pathelic. 
 
 The early white settlers, with the names of many, their altemjits at 
 incorporation and purchases from the Indians receive due attention. 
 Among the incidents given is an account of the Littleton witchcraft 
 c-xcitement. 
 
Concerning the military historj- of the town many facts and names 
 are given which were never before printed. Of the Littleton men who 
 served in the French and Indian War, forty-four names are given; of those 
 who served in the War of the Revolution, one hundred and fifty names, 
 and of the soldiers of the late war, one hundred and five names. 
 
 To the ecclesiastical history of Littleton, comprising as it does the 
 most important history of the town, has been devoted a large proportion 
 of this sketch from the date of incorporation. The leading facts 
 concerning each of the present religious societies are given, including 
 lists of the ministers with dates. 
 
 No attempt has been made at a complete town history. That could not 
 he written at this time, and anything approaching it will require the work 
 of a lifetime, but the matter given in the twenty-five closely printed 
 double column pages represents no small amount of research. The 
 author hopes that the fact of its being short will tend to make the sketch 
 more read, and perhaps leave impressed upon the minds of readers as 
 good a general idea of Littleton history as a more voluminous work. 
 
 ILLUSTRATIONS AND PLANS. 
 
 To^vN Hall and LiiiRARV. Gelatine print. Kev. Ei^mund Foster. Gelatine print. 
 
 JniiN Goldsmith, Steel Engraving. Sign of Lawrence Tavern, Woodcut. 
 
 Residence of Hon. J. A. Harwooii, wood cut. Col. Nahum Harwood, Gelatine print. 
 Plan of Nashobah Plantation | Lithograph Key. \Vm. H. White, Gelatine print, 
 
 made by Jonathan Danforth, i6S6, I facsimile. First Congregational Church, Woodcut. 
 
 Plan showing how Littleton was 1 Pmrpss Centre School House showing ) 
 
 formed from Nashob.'\h Planta- J nVint Kev. W. W. LovEjov. teacher, and ( Gelatine 
 
 t ION and other lands. ) P im- Scholars of High School, in 4 print. 
 
 ,, .J fT ir rir AutumU of iS/S. ) 
 
 Residence of J. Hartwell Whitcomb, , ,. '^ _ , ^ 
 
 Gelatine print. James Kimb.\ll, Steel Engraving. 
 
 Otis Manning, Steel Engraving. Hon. Geo. W. Sanderson, Gelatine print. 
 
 Residence of Hon. Geo. W. Sanderson, Hon. Jonathan Hartwell, Gelatine print. 
 
 Gelatine print. Hon. Joseph A. Harwood, Steel Engraving. 
 
 William Kimball, Steel Engraving. Samuel Smith, Gelatine print. 
 
 li.ARNiHAS Dodge, Steel Engraving. Gardner Prouty, Steel Engraving. 
 
 Bound in Cloth with Bevelled Edged Boards. 
 100 Copies only are offered for sale. Price $1.50. 
 
 May be had on application to the author, or, by the courtesy of 
 Miss White, librarian, at the 
 
 REUBEN HOAR LIBRARY. 
 
 Purchasers desiring the book sent by mail will please address as 
 below. 
 
 HERBERT J. HARWOOD, 
 
 LITTLETON, MASS. 
 Septe.mrer, i8qi.