7)3^ E 525 .038 copvi ADDRESS TO THB SOLDIEES OF OHIO, BY THB DEMOCRATIC STATE CENTRAL COMMITTEE. THE UNION AND THE CONSTITUTION. « <»» » > COLUMBUS: DEMOCRATIC STATE CENTRAL COMMITTEE B0OM3> 1S63. /- '• .:2?3 KOTE TO THE DEMOCRACY OF OHIO. It is of great importance that many tbousand copies of this AddreFS 6houlardy , And on the 27th of June, 1849, when relinquishing the charge of that paper, he again said : " That U'hich is really and inost valuable in our American liberties, depends upon the preservation and vigor of the Union of these States; and there- fore, all and every agitation in one section, necessarily generating coiin- ter agitation in the other, ought, from what quarter soever it may come, by every patriot and ■well-wisher of his country, to be 'indignantly frowned upon,' and arrested ere it be ' too late.' " On the 26'.h of October, 1850, at a large Democratic meeting in Dayton, Mr. V. reported a series of resolutions concluding thus : "That 'all obstructions to the execution of the laws, all combinations and associations, under whatever plausible character, with the real de- sign to direct, control, counteract, or awe the regular deliberation and action of the constituted authorities, are destructive of the fundamental principle of our institutions and of fatal tendency; that all such efforts, wherever made or by whomsoever advised, find no answering sympathy in our breast — nothing but loathing and contempt — and that we hereby }iledge ourselves to the country, that, so far as in us lies, the Union, tue Constitution and the Laws, must and shall be maintained.' " In a speech delivered in the House of Representatives, Dec. 15, 1859, Mr. VALLANDiGnAM said : " Is it not, I appeal to you, better then for you of the North, better for you of the South, better for us of the West, better for all of us, that this Union shall endure forever? Sir, I am for the Union as it is, and the Constitution as it is. I am against disunion now, and forever." In the same speech he also said : "Mr. Clerk, I am, not, perhaps, so hopeful of the final result as some other men; but I was taught in m}' boyhood that noblest of all Roman maxims — never to despair of the Republic. I was taught, too, by pious lips, a yet higher and holier doctrine still — a firm belief in a superintend- ing Providence, which governs in the affairs of men. I do believe that God, in his infinite goodness, has foreordained for this land a higher, mightier, nobler destiny than for any other country since the world began; Time's noblest empire is the last. From the Arctic ocean to the Isthmus of iJarien; from the Atlantic to the Alleghanies; stretching far and wide over the vast basin of the Mississippi, scaling the Rocky Mountains, and lost at last in the blue waters of the Pacific, I behold, in holy and patriotic vision, ONE Union, one Constitution, one Destiny. (Applause.) Rut this grand and magnificent destiny cannot be fulfilled by us, except as a united people." On the 20th of February, 1861, Mr. VALLANDicnAM said, in the House of llepresentatives : " Born, sir, upon the soil of the United States — attached to my country from earliest boyhood, loving and revering her with some part, at least, of the spirit of Greek and Roman patriotism — between these two alternatives, yilh all my mind, with all my heart, with all ray slrcripth of body and of soul, living or dyinpf, at home or in exile, I am for the Union which made it what it is; and, therefore, I am also for such terms of peace and adjust- ment as will maintain that Union now and forever." This declaration occurs in that famous speech in which Mr. V. is said to have proposed to divide the Union into ''four distinct nationalities.^^ Such is the assertion repeatedly and persistently made by the Abolition press. There could not be a more direct perversion of the plain and obvious meaning of language. It must be a bad cause that requires the aid of such means. Every one who has read the speech and the resolutions that accompany it, knows that the proposed division into ''four sections'^ upon which so much stress has been laid by the Abo- lition papers and speakers, refers simply to a proposed cliange in the manner of taking the vote in the Senate ; this and nothing more. It did not in the sliglitest degree contemplate dissolving the Union. Its purpose was to preserve it. No one has more firmly and consistently opposed -every movement or sentiment looking to disunion. And he has firmly opposed every movement aiming at peace on the basis of separation. His resolu- tions, introduced into the House of Representatives on thelGth of De- cember, 18G2, exhibit correctly his views and the character of his eflTorts in relation to this matter. The first three are — '^Resolved, 1. That the Union as it was must be restored and main- tained forever, under the Constitution as it is — the fifth article, providing for amendments, included. "2. That no linal treaty of peace, ending the present civil war, can be permitted to be made by the Executive, or anj' other person in the civil or military service of the United States, on any other basis than the integ- rity and entiretj' of the Federal Union, and of the States composing the same as at the beginning of hostilities, and upon that basis peace ought immediately to be made. 3. "That the Government can never permit armed or hostile interven- tion by any foreign power, in regard to the present civil war." The remaining three are in harmony with the above. In a speech at Hamilton, 0., September, 1862, accepting the nomi- nation for Congress, Mr. Vall.^ndigiiam said : " At your demand, therefore, men of the Third District, I accept the nomination, and present myself to the people for their sufi'rages, upon no other platform than the Constitutio.n as it is a.nd the Union as it w.vs." And such sentiments have characterized every speech, vote and act of his political life. At the first appearance of that deadly struggle which is still wearying the life and consuming the substance of the nation, Mr. Vallandiguam was among the most earnest and active in every honorable effort either to avert the coming storm or so to guide it that it might not lea^'e the wreck of the Union in its track. In nothing he has said or done, in Congress or out of Congress has he ever counseled or attempted the interposition of any unconstitutional or unlawful hindrance to the pro- secution of measures adopted by the Administration, but has uniformly "\ 10 counseled a full and implicit obedience to all laws when enacted. No man in the Union has stood more firmly against every sentiment that would encourage an uprising of the people in defiance of laws, even when unpopular and obnoxious. On the 12th of July, 18G1, he said in Congress : " For my own part, sir, while I would not in the beginning have given a dollar or a man to commence this war, I am willing — now that we are in the midst of it without any act of ours — to vote just as many men and just as much money as may be necessary to defend and protect the Federal Government. It would be both treason and madness now to disarm the Government, in the presence of an enemy of two hundred thousand men in the field against it." In his speech in Dayton, Aug. 2, 1862, he said, speaking on the subject of enlistments : " Whoever among the Abolitionists would curse secession, let him enlist, and then ne will show his faith by his works, and your armies will be full in a week. Let every man who would invite others to go, first go himself I have never interfered with enlistments. While the war lasts, our armies, for many reasons, must not be disbanded ; so I said in Congress more than a year ago. Without enlistments they can not be kept up ; and if any man, subject to military duty, really thinks that the Union can be restored by force and arms, and only in that way, let him enlist; it is his duty to enlist; he is 'disloyal' if he does not enlist. Whoever shall be drafted, should a draft be ordered according to Constitution and law, is in duty bound, no matter what he thinks of the war, to either go, or find a substitute, or pay the fine which the law imposes ; he has no right to resist, and none to run away." On the subject of supplies for the army, be said in his speech in Congress on the 14th of January last : " The country was at war, and I belonged to that school of politics which teaches that wben we are at war, the Government — I do not moan the Executive alone, but the Government is entitled to demand and have, without resistance, such number of men, such an amount of money, and supplies generally, as may he necessary for the war, until an appeal can be made to the peopled And again, in the same speech : " I could not, with my convictions, vote men and money for this war, and I would not, as a Representative, vote against them. I wanted th'' President sJioidd take, without opposition, all the men and money he ihould demand, and then to hold him to a strict accountability for the results. Not believing the soldiers responsible for the war, or its purposes, or consequences, I have never withheld my vote when their eeparate interests were concerned." Mr. Vallakdioiiam has uniformly done all in hia power to secure for the soldiers in the service of the Government, just and liberal pay- I 11 ment and bounties. In a letter to his constituents, under date of May I3th, 18G1, he said : " Waiving the question of the doubtful legality of the first proclama- tion of April 15th, calling out the militia fur "three months," under the act of 1795, I will yet vote to pay them, because they had no motive, but supposed duty and patriotism to move them : and, more- over, thoy will have rendered almost the entire service required of thorn before Congress shall meet." And he did thus vote. When on the 9th of July, 1861, the bill appropriating the sum of six millions for the payment of the three months volunteers was under consideration, Mr. Vallandigiiam not only supported it, but in reply to a remark of Mr. Stevens asking the House to give its unanimous consent to the passage of the bill, Mr. V. replied : " I presume there is no objection to the bill at all." In answer to a letter, dated Hamilton, 0., Oct. 6, 1862, Mr. Val- i.ANiDGiiAM said : " In reply to yours of yesterday, I have to say that I supported all the measures in the last Congress looking to the giving of invalid pen- sions to all soldiers ' wounded or incurring disability in the military service.' Upon a question like that, no just or humane man could hesi- tate for a moment. Every soldier who has performed service is entitled to the pay and bounty promised him by law, and all disabled in any way during service are entitled to pensions; and I have never, either^ directly by vote or indirectly by refusing to vote, withheld either, where the service had been rendered or the disability incurred ; nor would I do so." On the 2d of December, 1862, an effort was made in Congress to increase the pay of soldiers to fifteen dollars a month. Mr. Val- landigiiam took an active part in the movement, and proposed to " make the Jifteen doUaTS payable in gold.^' The above statements indicate clearly and correctly the position Mr. V. has occupied in relation to the support of the army. He has been at all times the firm friend and defender of the rights and interests of the soldiers, when drafted or enlisted into the service. He has always maintained that they were justly and fully entitled to every compensation promised by the government, and has on several occa- sions endeavored to secure an increase of that compensation^ Many of tlie soldiers know and appreciate the value of his services in tLei. be- half; and if they could all be permitted to know the full and true history of what he has done and endeavored to do for them, there is no one for whom they would cherish a stronger affection. As a general fact, the interested misrepresentations of enemies, war contractor.- ami abolition disunioni.sts, are the only reports in regard to Mr. Vam.a.n- DiGiiAM that have obtained a free circulation in the army. This cmnot coatinue much longer. A deep and stern sense of natural jastico 12 »uides the popular will, both in and out of the army, and Booncr or later forms the controlling sentiment. Not only has Mr. Vallandigiiam been charged with giving his •whole sympathies, and, as far as possible, his influence in aid of the rebellion, but he has even been accused of devising and favoring inva- sions of the Northern States. Great efforts have been made to fasten upon hira, both among soldiers and civilians, the odium and prejudice of this most damaging charge. As these reports, together with their ])retended proofs, must have come to your notice, we^will allude to a few of the more serious. On the 31st of July last there appeared in one of the daily papers of this State a leading editorial under the heading " Vallandigham in 1847 a?2rfl801." The article commenced with giving some account of Mr. V.'s course in regard to the war with Mexico, alleging that he had given that war his cordial sympathy and support, because it was waged in the interes-t of slavery, quoting also a resolution, in relation to the prosecution of the war, offered by him at a Democratic meeting held in Dayton, Dec. 18th, 1847. The article then says : " The man whose voice was then all for war, is now attuned to peace on any terms. The man whose soul was then fired against poor, help- less Mexico, now gives all his cordial sympathies to the South. Tlie same man who in 1847 uttered the words of the foregoing resolution, in 1861 uttered these words : '' ' Then, m, I am not a Southern man either, although in this most unholy ami unconstitutional crusade against the South, in the midst of the ihvasion, arKOU. insurrection and murder to which she lias been subjt ct and with which she is still threatened — with the torch of the incendiary and the dagger of the assasbin suspended over her, my most cordial ."ympaihies are ivholly with her J " Of the above quotation, the article says : "Mr. Vallandigham uttered this in 18G1, and nobody doubted his sincerity. His whole course of conduct, public and private, authenti- cates the sincerity of his statement that bis most cordial sympathies are with her (the South)." Portions of the above words, said to have been uttered by Mr. V. in 1861, are again turned over, repeated and commented upony and the reader reminded that the incendiaries and the assassin are the Union, men. The item thus started has had a large run in the abolition papers. In several instances the quotation from Mr. Vallandigham has been accompanied with remarks reafiirming and repeating the assertion that the speech in which the passage occurs was made in 18G1, and refers to the present war. One remark, which has been moving around in connection with the passage and as a commentary on it, says : " Thus as early as 1861 did this detested traitor, Vallandigham, array himself against the Union cause, and commence anathematizing 13 the brave soldier boys. * * * If he thinks ho will secure a sup- port in the army, he is much mistaken. Soldiers will not vote for a man who brands them with such epithets as assassins, murderers and incendiaries." Now the truth is that the passage is taken from a speech delivered in Congress on the 15th of December, 1859, more tiiax a year be- fore THE WAR commenced. The allusion is to John Brown's raid into Virginia, the general subject before the House being the fitness of Hon. John Sherman for the Speakership, he having indorsed and recom- mended the Helper book, which was supposed to be a part of the secret history and hidden machinery of the said John Brown's raid. And yet strange to say those unscrupulous enemies and defaraers of Mr. Vallandioiiam, have manufactured that base slander and spread it everywhere, asserting that the speech was made in 18G1, and. in reference to the present war. On the 1-lth of February, 18G3, Mr. Yaixandioham delivered an ad- dress in Newark, N. J., in which some of the New York papers falsely charged him with saying, " It has been proclaimed that it never was the Confederates' inten- tion to invade the Northern States, yt if this war is kept up, battles fought, no relenting spirit, no prospect of peace, no sound of concord to re achour ears, they ought to be induced to make that invasion." Mr. V. immediately addressed a note to the Tribune, under date of New York, February 16th, correcting the erroneous report, saying, " What I said as to invasion from the South was, that ' if the war was kept up with no relenting spirit, and no prospect of peace, they might possibly attempt invasion of the North and West, and then we would write for them precisely the history they have been writing for us during the last two years.' " This agrees with the passage as given in a full report of the speech published in the Freemen's Journal of February 28th. And yet that false report has been kept moving, although, in addition to the cor- rection in the newspapers, Mr. V. explicitly and positively denounced it as false from his place in Congress, and repeated what he did say. This absurd report belongs to the same class with that stupid and ma- lignant falsehood in which Mr. V. was charged with having said, at an Ohio caucus in Washington, December, 1860, that "before Federal troops should be permitted to pass through the Miami Valley, they must march over his dead body ;" a charge which has been thoroughly exploded and exposed on Republican authority. In a speech, accepting the nomination for Congress, September 4th, 1802, Mr. Vallandioiiam offered the following, which was adopted by the meeting unanimously, amid great cheering : " Resolved. That it is the highest duty of the citizen, whenever his countrj or State is invaded, to rush to its rescue, by arms, if he is capable of military service, and by money or otherwise every way, if he i.s not ; and that the 0**- mocracy, as a part of the people of this district, laying aside all party feeline; for that purpose, are ready with life and fortune to do their part iu discharginij this patriotic duty." 14 Such have been Mr. V.'s sentiments at all times In relation to any '^ possible or proposed invasion of the Northern States by the rebel armies. No shadow of a thought written or uttered by him in Congress or out of Congress ever has been or can b3 produced whic^ , even by implica- tion, looks like inviting or favoring an invasion of the Northern States. A charge of this sort would be too absurd for denial, were it not that it has been and still is repeatedly and persistently made with a bold and reckless tenacity of falsehood. Either the men who make this assertion believe that a lie well stuck to finally becomes a truth, or else, which is more likely, they hope to make a large number of people believe those base and damaging charges. We have thus. Soldiers of Ohio, placed before you a few fac's and statements showing the high, honorable and statesmanlike course pur- sued from the beginning and at all times by the man whom the Demo- cracy of your State have placed in nomination for Governor, and wh.m the people, with an almost unanimous sentiment, with an enthusiasm uncqualed, have determined to elect to that office. No election ever held in this country has been regarded with deeper interest ; none has involved more momentous issues. Never have the hearts of the people, of all ages and classes, been more deeply moved. In the election or defeat of Mr. Vallandigiiam a great principle is at stake, aside from the question of his fitness for that important office. The course the administration has pursued in his case and the position it still occupies are in direct conflict with the theory and practice of this government, as understood and applied by the Democratic party. Our views on this question were thus expressed, in our State Con- vention on the 11th of June last, when we said : " Resolved, That the arrest, imprisonment, pretended trial, and actual banish- ment of Clement L. Vallandigham, a citizen of the State of Ohio, not belonging to the land or naval forces of the United States, nor to the militia in actual pervicc, by alleged military authority, for no other pretended crime than that of uttering words of legitimate criticism upon the conduct of the Administra- tion in power, and of appealing to the l)allot-box Ibr a change of policy — (tjaid arrest and military trial taking place where the courts of law are open and un- obstructed, and for no act done within the sphere of active military operations in carrying on the war) — we regard as a palpable violation of the following provisions of the Constitution of the United States : '■ '1. Confcrcss fhall make no law * » * abriiiging the freedom of Bpceoh or of the prfSR, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition (he Goveruuiont for a redress of grievances. '• • 2. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated ; and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or afflrmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things t'> be seized. •' '3. No person shall be beld to answer for a capital or otherwise infamous crime, unless on presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forcts. or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public d.mger. '• ' 4. In all criminal prosecutions, the aicused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been comaiitt«.>d. which district shall have been previously ascertained by law.' " And we furthermore denounce said arrest, trial and banishment, as a direct insult offcred to the sovereignty of tiie people of Ohio, by whose organic law it is declared, that ' no person Khali be transported out of the State for any oSlenHw committed within the same.' " .,..^„^^^ LIBRARY OF CONGRESS iiillllliliiiii n nkA-i tOkK QOT O LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 013 704 927 2