-R k: em arks on A / \ rricaTi coio- n ma tioTi amci the f\ tol I Dioni oF s a veTv / 8 3 3, Qass '^Vi Book -^ '^-' tt^ t ;2> R E MA R K S ^ ' AFRICAN COLONIZATION THE ABOLITION OF SLAVERY IN TWO PARTS Y A CITIZEN of' NtTw ENGLANJ:> WINDSOK, VT. P I' B L I S n E D r Y R t (MI A R D S &. T R A C V 18 3 3. w\,U TO THE READER. In giving his Remarks to tiie public, the author is conscious of no other motive than a desire to advance the interests of truth, freedom and happiness. He has no pride of authorship or desire of notice to be gratified ; no pecuniary interest to be advanced ; and no feelings of unkindness towards those who dissent from his views, to be indulged by this publication. He has written, not with a view to satisfy the mere critic, or to escape his notice ; not to advance new theories, or present old ones in a new dress. It has been his object to write for plain, com- mon-sense, matter-of-fact readers : to present plain truths, well-estab- lished facts, and common arguments, in a plain manner, and for a practi- cal purpose. It is his earnest desire to see all the friends of humanity in this country act right — act vigorously — act in harmony, and in the best possible manner, for the relief and the elevation of the whole Afri- can race, whether bond or free. For the sentiments advanced in rela- tion to African Colonization, the Colonization Society is not responsible, except for the extracts from its official publications, and the legitimate application of those extracts. If the author has mistaken or misapplied the principles or language of that Society, he alone is responsible. The same remark applies to the use made of other publications. Should any reader think that there is undue severity in the strictures on the publications, measures and sentiments referred to in the Introduction, and in Part II., he is requested to examine the whole subject without prejudice — to read those publications, and ponder well their spirit and tendency, and then state publicly and candidly in what the severity con- sists, and in what manner it might have been dispensed with. To the friends of humanity and justice, who have sympathy for the poor and oppressed African, the author cheerfully submits his vieAvs ; and to Him who hears the oppressed when they cry, he would commit both himself and his readers, with the earnest prayer that they may be guided by His Spirit in all their efforts to do good. A Citize:^ of New E>'GLArfD, Jpril 11, 13:33. INTRODUCTION A few months since, a pamphlet of 236 pages fell into my hands, en- titled " Thoughts on African Colonization ; or an impartial exhibition of the doctrines, principles and purposes of the American Colonization Socie- ty, together leith the Resolutions, Addresses and Remonstrances oj the free jieoplt of color, by Wm. Lloyd Garrison." The object of the writer was to prove that " the Colonization Society is not hostile to slavery: That it '■^apologizes for slavery and slave-hold- ers ,-" — " Recognizes slaves as property ; — " Increases the value of slaves ;" — " Is the enemy of immediate Abolition ;" — " JVourished by fear and self- ishness ,•" — " Aims at the expulsion of the Blacks ;" — " Disparages the Free Blacks ;" — " Prevents the instruction of the Blacks ;" — " Deceives and misleads the nation." The second part of the pamphlet, occupying 76 pages, consists of " Resolutions, Addresses and Remonstrances of the free people of color, " showing that they are opposed to the Colonization Society, For several years I had felt a deep interest in the welfare of the col- ored people, bond and free, and in every effort which seemed likely to aid in securing freedom and happiness to the whole race, or to any por- tion of it. I had been in favor of the Colonization Society, because, after a tolerably thorough examination, it seemed to promise more good to the whole African race than any other plan which had been proposed, and because it was actually doing good to a considerable portion. When this pamphlet appeared, I was disposed to examine it carefully, from the interest I felt in the colored race, in the Colonization Society, and in the Autlior of the pamphlet; having felt a sympathy for him when, from the confines of a prison, his touching poetry, " Tlie Freedom of the Mind,'^ echoed througli the land, and having supposed him a true friend of the Africans and sincerely devoted to their interests. I did not agree with him as to the manner of removing the evils we both deplored, or approve of his harsh language or rash measures. Many things which had appear- ed in liis paper,* seemed peculiarly fitted to create jealousy and hostility between the colored people and tlie whites, and increase the alienation of feeling between the Northern and Southern sections of the country, and if generally countenanced, must be productive of serious injury. However sincere he might be, it seemed evident that he had more zeal than judgment, and must alter his course or fail of doing much good. * TI16 Liberator. The pan)plilet exhibits some talent and much labor, especially in col- lecting materials, and I felt assured that if the Colonization Society is a bad institution and "deceives and misleads the nation,''^ this would be proved beyond all controversy in the course of the 236 pages ; especially a.s the author had previously brought very serious charges against the Society and assumed heavy responsibilities. He had declared that " the superstructure of the Colonization Society rests upon the following pil- lars: 1. Persecution; 2j^ Falsehood; 3. Coivardice ; 4. Infidelity.''^* "I shall be willing to stake my reputation upon itf for honesty, prudence, benevolence, truth and sagacity. If I do not prove the Colonization So- ciety to be a creature without heart, without brains, eyeless, unnatural, hypocritical, relentless, unjust — then nothing is capable of demonstration — then let me bo covered with confusion efface." Such declarations gave reason to expect that evidence the most full and decisive would be produced to sustain them, and led me to examine tliis evidence with more than usual care. Having a large portion of the documents of the Society at hand, I was enabled to examine the extracts made from those in their connexion, and found it important to do so. The result of this examination was a full conviction, 1. That instead of an " impartial exhihilion" the pamphlet contains ::ltogether a. partial or one-sided view of the Colonization Society, exhib- iting only its- apparently objectionable features, and those strangely dis- torted. 2. That a large portion of the extracts made to support the charges, were not from the documents of the Society, but from newspapers, ser- ivicns, addresses, &c. 3. That a large portion of the extracts made from the documents of the Society do not appear in them as the sentiments of the Board of M anagers. They are extracts from speeches, copied into " the Proced- lUgs of the Society at the annual meeting," from sermons or addresses published in different sections of the country, or from reviews and arti- cles published in other periodicals, copied into the "Appendix to the Report," or the African R,epository, "not because every sentiment is ii.pproved" by the Managers or the Secretary, but because they have been willing to exhibit honestly the different sentiments of individuals, and leave the public to judge in view of the whole subject. 4. Many of the extracts are frequently interrupted thus * * * show- ing that something is left out. In examinincr these extracts as they -tund in the publications of the Society, several of them will be seen to ho unfairly made, parts being omitted which would essentially, modify their meaning;. G. That some of the quotations are made by puUing detached senten- ces together, so as to convey a different meaning from that intended by the writers. [See examples in the Christian Spectator, March 1833, pp. 153, 154.] 6. That several of the extracts contain language capable of being misinterpreted, especially when standing alone; and that ir-ferences and comments relating to these are unfairly made. * Liberator, July Oth, 1S3!. } The pamphlet, which was then in contempl-'tion.— Z.:4. Ja'j' "0, 1331. 7. That although the Society may have liad wrong arguments used in its favor ; may have been patronized by some with wrong motives ; al- though some may have had too high expectations of its success ; althoug'i some of its best friends, or even its Board of Managers, may have made mistakes j still the chai-ges against the Society are not sxistained and can- not be. 8. That the entire reverse of nearly every charge can, by a similar license, be as fairly sustained as these ; but neither view alone would be an " impartial exhibition.'''' 9. That with all the faults that can possibly be charged upon the Colonization Society with any show of truth, it is still the most promis- ing means of benefiting the whole African race yet devised; and is en- titled to the cordial support of all 1.h6 people of these United States, and the approbation of all the friends of liberty throughout the world. 10. That a fair examination ofthe history and operations of the Soci- ety, will bring other minds to the same result. 11. That if the Author would give his pamphlet a calm, serious, prayer- ful re-examination; would consider the history, principles and operations ofthe Society; the character of those M'ho formed it, and those who now conduct its affairs ; as well as the great body of its patrons ; would review his charges and the manner by which he has attempted to sustain them ; he would "be covered with confusion of face" without any effort being made by others to refute his charges ; and that although some who are glad of an excuse for doing nothing for a benevolent society, may thank the author for his attacks, yet benevolent men, who think and act for themselves, will not be long misled or embarrassed by them, and the Colonization Society has nothing to fear ultimately from such oppo- sition. 12. That the pamphfet referred to, might do some good. It might ex- cite attention, examination and discussion, which should develope more fully the principles of the Society, make them better understood, and their importance more deeply felt, and thus benefit the cause in New England. It might make some of the friends of Colonization more care- ful in their arguments and efforts, and lead to increased watchfulness and prudence in the management of the Society. It might assist in removing the impression at the South,' "that the people of New England are willing to insult and abuse them." It is well known that the author of the pamphlet is very obnoxious both to the friends and enemies of Colonization and Emancipation in the slave states. They have thought his language iu relation to slave-holders slanderous, his treatment of them abusive, and his influence on the col- ored people peculiarly fitted to produce insurrections. Some of them have supposed that many in New England, and especially Colonization- ists, were disposed to countenance such measures, secretly if not openly. His hostility to the Society, therefore, might convince the Southern peo- ple who have opposed it, that his movements and Colonization movements are not one and the same thing, and thus lead them to examine its merits. 13. That as the pamphlet Mas likely to do some good, although in a different way from that intended, therefore no reply to it was needed, and that no notice ought to be taken of it by the friends of Colonization. Although containing some truth with much error, the error was sopalpa. 6 ble as to be easily detected by those acquainted with the history of tlie Society. These were my sober convictions after a very thorough examination ; and similar views I found were entertained by many editors,* clergymen, and others, who had examined the subject. After what has been said, it may seem sti-ange that I should notice this pamphlet with so much for- mality. My apology is this: — 1. Many persons have not the publications of the society. Very few in New England have the Annual Reports or any documents which give its early history. 2. Few persons have time to examine the sixteen Reports and eight volumes of the African Repository, if they were accessible : consequent- ly, they are not prepared to defend the society when attacked, and are in some danger of being misled. 3. It is now an easy matter for any one to collect materials from this pamphlet and the Liberator, and write newspaper articles accusing the Colonization Society, and its agents, of "deception" "falsehood" " prop- agating libels" " publishing gross fictions with a view to gull the weak and the ignorant" &-c. and thus new articles are furnished for the Lib- erator, or copied from some paper that is willing to publish them. In the same manner it is easy to prepare addresses on the subject of slave- ry, spiced with a good degree of ridicule and sarcasm for Colonization- ists ; get admitted to lyceums and debating societies, and in some instan- ces even to churches, under the apparent sanction of ministers ; create a temporary excitement, and then boast of their success, their converts and contributions; challenge the whole world to refute their arguments, and then, if no one notice them, to cry victory, and throw out more insulting challenges.f * " Since commencinc; the agency, I have conversed with the editors of between 90 and 100 pa- pers and periodicals in Maine, Massacliusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, and tJie city of New York. Of these editors, I found but four who expressed opposition to our Society." * * * I have conversed individually or in small circles with more than three hundred clergymen, of different denominations: only three of whom manifested hostility to the Society. A small number of others had not examined the history or claims of the Society sufficiently to express a decided opinion. A few others expressed some doubts, occasioned by the charges brought against the Society by Blr. Garrison, and other agents of the New England Anti-Slavery Society. Not hav- ing the publications of the Colonization Society, or any means of examining in their proper con- nexion, the extracts made to support these charges, they felt a temporary embarrassment. A n;uch larger number, who had been in the same unsettled state from the same cause, stated that bii examining the publications and the actual influence of the Society, tliey had become convincedl that the charges brought against it are not susttiined. Some of this class complained of having been reported as opposed to the Colonization Society." [Letter of an Agent to Rev. J. N. Danforth.] — American Traveller, Dec. 1832. t Witness the following specimens. "3:5= By a Presbyterian Clergyman. [ For the Liberator. ] TO MR. DANFORTH, AGENT FOR THE SLAVE-DRIVERS. A citizen with a little ' brains and blood,' wlio wishes to help those who are Hugging to put dovn slavcru,' offers to meet you in open debate in Boston, and maintain against your negative, tlie truth of this proposition—' Every living American Slave-holder is a Kidnapper.' The Editor of the Liberator is authorized to make the necessary arrangements, so that you may exhibit all vour ' blood and brains,' in ' tugging' to prop up slavery. ONE WHO HAS RIGHTS." Liberator, Feb. 16, 1833. " 95° Another challenge, Mr. Danforth I— from a source, too, eminently entitled to your no- tice. Are you ready ? [ For the Liberator. ] TO REV. BIR. DANFORTH, PRESBYTERIAN MINISTER. As you are manifestly afraid to face ' One who has Rights,' and prove that ' every American Slave-holder is not a Kidnapper,' — I hereby offer to meet you in open debate in Boston, and 4. The New England Anti-slavery Society has adopted this pamph- let for distribution, and its agents and managers are actively opposing the Colonization Society in this country, and sending their publications to England, thus furnishing materials which some of the British Review- .ers and editors seem much inclined to use in slandering this country. 5. My object in noticing this pamphlet is not to reply to the charges, or hold a controversy with its author, or any one who agrees with him, adopts his style and imitates his spirit.* It is my design I. To give a brief view of the history and operations of the Coloniza- tion Society, develope its character and principles, and give some rea- sons for sustaining it. II. To furnish a similar view of the New England Ant-slavery Soci- ety, express my own views in relation to the objects proposed in its Con- stitution, and state the reasons why I cannot co-operate with the So- ciety. maintain against your negative the foUowing proposition: — Everv Slave-holder who pro- fesses TO BE A Christian, by whatever name he is called, or whatever office he holds IN the Church, is a Hypocrite. The Editor of the Liberator is authorized to make the necessary arrangements— if you choose to confront . WATCHMAN." Liberator, Feb. 22, 1833. * The unfairness and misrepresentation of the pamphlet have been partially exposed in the Methodist Magazine and Quarterly Review, for January, African Repository for January, and the Christian Spectator for March. Also in several numbers of the Christian Mirror, (Portland, Me.) and in late numbers of the Vermont Chronicle. PART I. AFRICAN COLONIZATION. Annual Reports of the American Colonization Society, Af- rican Repository. Review on African Colonization : Christian Spec- tator, Sept. 1830. Letters on the Colonization Society, with a view of its probable results : addressed to the Hon. C. F. Mercer. By M. Carey, 1832. American Colonization Society, N. A. Review, July 1832, Art. VII. Slavery Q^uestion in Virginia, American Quarterly Review, Dec. 1832. Colonization Society, Christian Examiner, Sept. 1832, and Jan. 1833. From the first introduction of slaves into the United States and the West Indies, there have been multitudes to bear testimony against the system of slavery, and weep for the misery occasioned by it. Some have given proof of their sincerity by their skill in devising, and their zeal, energy, pesseverance and self denial in prosecuting plans for abolishing the abominable traffic in human flesh, and for relieving the misery of the slaves, and of the free people of color. The names of Clarkson, Wil- berforce, and others, v/ho were " shoulder to shoulder" with them in the great conflict for the abolition of the slave trade, will be held in grateful remembrance, when the names of many heroes and conquerors, whom history has immortalized, shall have become odious. Many individuals have manifested a praise-worthy zeal, both before and since the abolition of the slave-trade, in their efforts to emancipate and elevate the enslaved Africans ; while great multitudes have slumber- ed with indifi'erence over their misfortunes, or passed them by in despair, as if there were no remedy. " In consequence of the memorable decision of the English Judiciary, in the case of Somerset, that slavery could not exist upon tlie soil of England, several iiundred blacks, unaccustomed to the profitable employments of a great city, were thrown upon their resources in the streets of London. The celebrated Granville Sharp having taken a peculiarly prominent part in the whole affair of the slave question, they flocked to him as their patron ; and he, after much reflection, determined to colonize them in Africa.'"^ Here was the origin of the Sierra Leone Colony. In 1787, four hun- dred negroes and sixty Europeans were sent thither at the expense of the British government. In 1789, thirty-nine more were sent out. In 1791, about 1200 emigrants from Nova Scotia were induced to join the colony by the influence of the venerable Clarkson. These were originally ref- ugees from this country, who had placed themselves under British pro- N. A. Review, July, 1832, p. 120. 10 tection.* The Maroonsf from Jamaica were introduced about the year 1805. Since the abolition in 1808, large numbers have joined the col- ony who were liberated from slave ships. In 1823, the colony contained about 18000 inhabitants, of whom, 12000 were liberated Africans. In 1828, the number of this class was more than 15000. Two thousand four hundred and fifty-eight liberated captives were added to the colony^ during the year 1827 alone.| While the leading abolitionists in Great Britian were thus providing an asylum for the liberated Africans, the attention of great and good men in the United States was turned to the same subject. They saw that many who had been liberated were ignorant, without employment, desti- tute of the means and motives necessary to elevate men, and, consequent- ly, exposed to temptation, suffering and crime. Even before the com- mencement of the Sierra Leone colony, as early as 1777, Mr. Jefferson had formed a plan of colonizing the free people of color ; but the distract- ed state of the country occasioned by the war, or other causes, prevented its developement. In the year 1787, Dr. Thornton, of Washington, ^'■proposed the sub- ject of the colonization of the people of color on the coast of Africa to the people of Boston, and Providence, (Rhode Island.) Many were disposed to accompany him to Africa, but the want of funds prevented the experi- ment. In 1789, Rev. Samuel Hopkins, of Newport, Rhode Island, wrote to Granville Sharp, to ascertain the situation of the colony at Sierra Leone, and especially, whether the blacks of New England " might have any part of the colonial lands to settle on, and on what terms." In the American Museum, is an article, dated March 6, 1790, attrib- uted to Ferdinando Fairfax, in which " it is proposed, that a colony should be settled under the auspices and protection of Congress, by the negroes now within the United States, and be composed of those who are already, as well as those who at any time hereafter, may become lib- erated by the voluntary consent of their owners," &c. About the year 1800 or 1801, the Legislature of Virginia instructed Mr. Monroe, then Governor of the State, to endeavor, through the agency of President Jefferson, to secure " an asylum beyond the limits of the United States for such persons of color as had been, or might be, eman- cipated under the laws of the commonwealth." An effort was made to obtain a territory, first in Africa, from the Sierra Leone Company, and af- terwards in South America, from the government of Portugal. Both at- tempts were unsuccessful. In 1811, Mr. Jefferson, in reply to inquiries relative to Colonization, wrote as follows : « Having long ago made up my mind on this subject, I h*ve no hesitation in saying, that I have ever thought that the most desirable measure which could be adopted for drawing off this part of our population, — ^^ most advantageous to them- selves, as ivell as ws." Again, " Indeed nothing is more to be ivishedthan that the United States tcoidd themselves undertake to make such an establishment on the coast of Africa." * North American Review, July, 1832, p. 120. t A name given to a large num^ef J^f Negroes, originally slaves in Jamaica, who availed themselves of a Revolution in tnai ismuu to take refuge among the mountains of the interior, and have never since been subauea. id. y. 131. X lb. 11 In 1816, the legislature of Virginia again passed a resolve,* request- ing the Executive to take measures for procuring "an asiflumfor such persons of color as are npiofree, and may desire it, and for those who may hereafter be emancipated within this commonwealth," &c. By this time, tlie experiment at Sierra Leone, notwithstanding all its embarrassments, had demonstrated that the plan of Colonization is prac- ticable : the views of individuals, far separated from each other by dis- tance and circumstances, began to be understood ; and there was suffi- cient evidence that a noble plan for benefiting the African race might be carried forward, to enlist the energies of the Rev. Robert Finley, of Basking Ridge, N. J., draw out his views and feelings relating to the interests of the free blacks, and urge him forward to be the pioneer of' the enterprize to be commenced for their benefit. "A concurrent movement towards the adoption of some particular plan of ope- rations was distinctly concerted in March 181G, at Georgetown, D. C, between a resident of that place and several citizens oftlie two neighboring states. Tliis was without the knowledge or participation of any individual Uving north of Maryland But in the course of Uie ensuing summer and autumn, the discussion became more general and excited considerable interest in Washington, Baltimore, Philadelphia, Princeton, and other principal places in that section of the country. Still Mr. Finley seems rather to have led public opinion, for while others were only talking and thinking, he 7Das drvoting himself lohoUy to the cause. After having reflected deliberately on the proper place, time and manner of commencing the long con- templated movement — and the propriety of doing something had scarcely been dis- puted at all — he resolved to test the popularity, and in some degree the practica- bility of his own plan, by introducing the subject to public notice at Washington. He arrived at that city about the first of December, 1816, and began to make ar- rangements for a meeting of the citizens. Many ridiculed, and some opposed him ; but meekly contenting himself with the observation, ' I know this scheme is from God,' lie persevered and prevailed. The Society was organized on the first of January, 1817. 't , The second article of the constitution defines the object of the socie- ty, and is in the following language : — '•' The object to which its crttention is to be exclusively directed, is to promote and execute a plan for colonizing, (with their consent) tlie free people of color re- siding in this country, in Africa, or such other place as Congress shall deem most expedient. And the Society shall act, to effect this object, in co-operation with tiie general government and such of the States as may adopt resolutions on the subject." It would seem impossible that any opposition could with propriety be made to the Society, especially as it "has uniformly acted in pursuance of these clearly declared principles, to the exclusion of all others."J But probably no other Society has ever triumphed over opposition so various, or obstacles so numerous. At the first annual meeting it was stated by the President, that " an effort has unfortunately been made to prejudice the minds of the free people of color against the institution, which had its origin, it is believed, in an honest desire to promote their happiness. A suggestion has been made to them ivhich this Society dis- claims by the terms of its Constitution, that they are to be constrained to migrate to the country which may be selected for the seat of our col- ony. .Yo suspicion can be more unfounded. It is sanctioned by no decla- *This was the first puhlic act of Virginia in relation to this subject. The former measures were in secret session, as the time had not arrived wlien any measure having even an indirect o£2ring in favor of emancipation, could be publicly discussed in Virginia. t N. A. R. July 1832 p. 126. | lb. p. 127. {)^After quoting this identical article of the Con- stitution, Mr. Ganison cites above fifty extracts which he says ^'abundantly sustain the charge, that the Society has not swerved from its original design" ^c. — [Thoughts on African Col. p. 42. etc".] rations or acts of the Society, from which alone our intentions can be candidly inferred.* Tlien the Society was opposed as "an invention of the slave-holder to ^^ remove the free blacks, that he might hold his slaves more securely in bondage.'''' This accusation seemed quite plausible to northern men, especially when it was said that "it originated in a slave state. The Virginia Legislature had passed resolves in favor of colonizing the free blacks so early as 1801, and shocking to relate, "it was done in secret session!!" And moreover "the President himself was a slave hold- er." These circumstances, to many minds, ivere proof positive that the Colonization Society was a monstrosity, " designed to perpetuate slave- ry." When this charge was disavowed and disproved, and it was seen that its founders and managers did hope and believe that the moral influ- ence of the Society would tend to voluntary emancipation. Northern men began to examine and approve its plans ; but before the obstacles crea- ted by this objection were removed, opposition sprang up at the South, denouncing the Society as " a northern scheme to interfere with their rights," "rob them of their propercy," "deluge the land in blood," &c. or in other words, " to get away their slaves, or encourage among them insubordination and insurrection." This charge was also denied and disproved, and the two objections, to some extent, served to destroy each other. Still there are a few in New England who oppose the Society because they say it tends to perpetuate slavery, while those who are for perpetuating slavery at the South, oppose it " because it tends to eman- cipation." The society was opposed and ridiculed as " a visionary scheme which could accomplish nothing." Some opposed and multitudes neglected it because it would cost money. This, with many, was objection enough. Many would do nothing to aid the Society, because it was for the ben- efit of the colored people. Some were willing to consign them to per- petual servitude, ignorance, and debasement, and others thought that they coidd not be elevated. For a time, it was difficult to decide on the place for planting a colo- ny. Some were in favor of Africa; some of Haytr; some of Canada; some of South America or Mexico ; while others would have the col- ony beyond the Rocky mountains, or within the territory of the United States. When it was decided to make the experiment on the African coast, some believed the colonists could not endure the climate, or that they could not be there protected, governed, or elevated. It was stig- matized as a "wild scheme for sending miserable, degraded beings, from a Christian to a barbarous country, to be civilized and Christianized;" and what was still more absurd, "to civilize a whole contiment of kid- nappers and slave dealers." A great preliminary work was to be performed, before a colony could be planted. In this country, information must be circulated ; the condition of the colored people be understood ; facts and arguments must arouse the atten- tion and interest of the community ; ingorance and prejudice must be enlightened and overcome, and funds be collected. Then the coast of Africa must be surveyed ; territory purchased ; the favor of the natives * Speech of Judge Washington. First Annual Report. 1^ secured ; tlie best location selected and fittad for receiving emigrants. Numerous obstacles retarded the acquisition of territory: tlie natives were jealous of white men, judging of their character, doubtless, from the specimens they had been acquainted with in the slave trade. Some of the native chiefs were in fa:vor of selling territory to be occupied by colored people from America, but others were strongly op- posed to it. They could not sec why such a colony should be planted there, and were fearful it would interfere with the slave trade, or in some way affect their interest. In 1820 a number of emigrants went out, but "they found it impossi- ble tO' obtain a suitable place, and were compelled, by a variety of un- toward circumstances, to make a temporary establishment in the low, unhealthy island of Sherbro. Here they were detained for some time, endeavoring to purchase land — and were attacked by fatal diseases, ■which carried off three agents and twenty of the colonists."* Several other emigrants went out in 1821, but their prospects were truly dis- couraging, till an extensive territory* was purchased on the coast, and the colony removed to Cape Montserado. In 1822, Mr. Ashmun went out to the colony with a small band of emigrants, and found those who had previously gone out, in a wretched condition. They had suffered niuch from sickness, the want of medical aid, of suitable dwellings, and those comforts and conveniences necessary to the enjoyment of life and health. The health of the agent had failed, and he had sailed for the United States, leaving the colonists defenceless, and, as it afterwards appeared, upon the verge of destruction. Soon after Mr, Ashman's arri- val, he discovered an extensive plot among the native tribes, to destroy the colony. Although they had fairly sold the territory, and consented to its settlement, they :yere either " sick of their bargain," or thirsting for plunder, and had proved treacherous. Finding it impossible to recon- cile them or prevent an attack, Mr. Ashmun made the best possible preparation, and with but a handful of men defended the colony from two violent attacks of several hundred armed natives, and secured a permanent peace. Since that time, the Society has been gaining strength, and, notwithstanding all the obstacles which have opposed its progress, the colony has grown and prospered be3'^ond the most sanguine expectations of its more intelligent friends. The following table, it is believed, exhibits the number of emigrants. Previous to May 1823, . . . 225. In 1S28, . . . 295. In 1824, . . . 105. 1829, . . . 160. 1825, ... 66. 1830, . . . 406. 1826, . . . 288. 1831, . . . 445. 1327, ... 238. 1832, ... 790. More than 700 of the emigrants were slaves, manumitted for the pur- pose of removal to Liberia. Two hundred forty-seven of this class were sent out the last year, and one hundred eighty-nine near the close of 1831. The territory of the colony extends along the coast about 280 miles, and into the interior from 20 to 30 miles, and in some places to a greater distance. It is believed that additional lands may be purchased at a low price, to any desirable extent.f The soil, animal and vegetable produc- * Mr. Cirey's Loiters. t Additional purchases have hpen made diirir!^' the last year, and two new setllemcuts, one at Craud I!assa, ai;d one at Grand Cape AJount, are abjut being made. 14 tions, and the commercial advantages of this country, are such as to ren- der it capable of sustaining a large population. " During the year preceding the first of May last, 5t) vessels had visited the port of Monrovia, of wliich 32 were American, 25 Enghsh and 2 Frencli. The exports during the same period (consisting chiefly of camwood, ivory, palm-oil, tortgjse- siiell and gold) amounted to $125,54'.) 10; of imports to f 80,000."* The climate is now believed to be favorable to people of color. " The natives on the coast are remarkably healthy, and so are the acclimated emigrants."f la the early history of the colony, although there was much sickness, the mortality was trifling, compared with that in the first colonies of this country, and the colony of Sierra Leone. "The colon/ which settled at .Tames Town was at one time reduced from 500 to C 3 persons."! "In twelve years after £85,000 had been expended by the Virginia Company, only 600 persons remained in the colony. "f " ^'n 1634, after £150,000 had been expended, and more than 9,000 persons had emigrated to the colonies, only 1,800 remained."t "Of 1,600 per- sons who came out with John Winthrop in 1630, 200 died in six months."t At Sierra Leone, "the intemperance and imprudence of the i emigrants brought on a mortality which reduced their numbers nearly one half, during the first year."| After the 1200 refugees from Nova Scotia had removed to Sierra Leone, "one-tenth of the Nova-Scotians and half of the Europeans died during one season, as much from want of- provisions as from any other cause."| No mortality like this has visited the colony at Liberia. The colonists say : " We enjoy health after a few months residence in the country, as uniformly, and in as perfect a degree, as we possessed that blessing in our native country. And a "iversal emancipation was there- by rendered more hopeless, Jl'hat then is the iujluence of this Society on slavery? To answer this question, we must examine its history, the views of its founders and managers, and such facts as we can collect from other sources. Emancipation, to some extent, had taken place long befoi-e the Socie- ty was formed ; but the experiments thus made, convinced many of the Southern people that emancipation, under existing circumstances, was unsafe and injurious to the slaves, their masters, and those made free. Mr. Clay stated, at the first Annual Meeting of the Society, that "sev- eral of the states had, and perhaps all of them would, prohibit entirely emancipation, unless some such outlet was created. A sense of their own safety required the painful prohibition. Experience proved that per- sons turned loose, who were neither freemen nor slaves, constituted a great moral evil, threatening to contaminate all parts of society."* At the same meeting, Hon. C. F. Mercer said, " Many thousand indi- viduals in our native State, you well know, Mr. President, are restrained from manumitting their slaves, as 3rou and I are, by the melancholy con- viction, that they cannot yield to the suggestions of humanity without in- jury to tlieir country.*" Public sentiment, and the laws which grew out of it, were thus operat- ing to prevent emancipation ; and those who formed the Colonization Society saw clearly that, unless some plan could be devised and carried into etFect, which should convince the Southern planters that slaves can be liberated with benefit to themselves and safety to their masters, eman- cipation must cease. To attempt immediate emancipation without Col- onization, would be like the attempt to stay the tornado, beat back the current of a mighty river, or rather like the attempt to quench the flames with materials highly combustible. Abolition societies could not press emancipation much farther, for experiments already made were operating to prevent it. The plan of the Colonization Society, therefore, was the best one which the united wisdom of the friends of the colored race, who understood the difficulties of the case, could devise. The simple princi- ple of its Constitution was the only one on which the Society could act to any purpose. On this ground the North and the South could meet ; and while acting within its proper sphere, neither party could reasonably object to it. The successful operation of the Society Avould enable the ' slaveholder to liberate his slaves in a manner beneficial to themselves, and consistent with the laws of the States, and without injury to any one. The slaveholder who would perpetuate the system had no right to oppose the Society. It would not « coerce any proprietor to emanci- pate' — would not 'interfere with the rights' secured to him by law, and would not ' promote insurrection and insubordination among the slaves.' If the North and the South could be brought to examine this subject calmly, and interchange their views and feelings, they would at length act in concert, and in the best manner, for the removal of evils which both deplored, and from which both suffered, but which neither could re- move alone. If the Society were formed wholly of Northern men, the South would * First Annual Keporl. 20 not cooperate, but would oppose it as officious interference, and an in- fringement of their rights. Besides, if all were Northern men, they would be liable to act without a due regard to existing circumstances at the South — to the laws of the several States, and the Constitution of the Union. They would be likely to excite jealousy and create alienation, which would result in a dissolution of the Union. On the other hand, if the Society were composed only of Slave-holders, the North would not cooperate, but would regard it as a selfish scheme to perpetuate slavery. There would be danger of their being governed too much by their own interests, of pursuing offensive measures, which would excite the indig- nation and interference of the North, and thus promote disunion. An union of Northern and Southern men was tlierefore necessary. This would lead to a discussion of the subject in all parts of the coun- try — would draw attention to the whole colored race — excite sympathy in their behalf, and lead to measures for their relief, in which all parties could unite. If the colony should succeed, it would be a desirable home for those who should go thither. New circumstances and motives might develope talents and form characters, which should convince all men, that Africans can be cultivated like other men, — show how slaves may be liberated and elevated, and lead slaves to desire and masters to grant emancipation. All these views might have entered the minds of the founders of the So- ciety. There is abundant evidence that some of the founders did believe the moral influence of the society tvould tend to voluntary emancipation, and that the Board of Managers have ever entertained this helvf. At the first annual meeting, John Randolph, after saying that "The measure proposed would prove one of the greatest securities to enable the master to keep in possession his own property," added. That " if a place could be provided for their reception, and a mode of sending them thence, there were hundreds, nay, thousands, who ivould, by manumitting their slaves, relieve themselves from the cares attendant on their possess- ion" ! Mr. Clay said, "Let the Colony once be successfully planted, and legislative bodies who have been grieved at the necessity of passing those prohibitory laws,* which at a distance might appear to stain our codes, ivill hasten to remove the impediments to the exercise of benevo- lence and humanity." Judge Washington, the president ofthe Society, said at the same meeting : — " The effectof this institution, if its prosper- ety shall equal our wishes, will be alike propitious to every interest of our domestic society, and should it lead, as we may fairly hope it will, to the slow but gradual abolition of slavery, it will wipe from our po- litical institutions tlie only blot which stains them, and in the palliation of which ive shall not be at liberty to plead the excuse of moral necessity, until ive have honestly exerted all the means lohich tve possess for its ex- tinction.'' General R. G, Harper, one of the Vice Presidents, in a letter to the Secretary, says : — " It tends, and may powerfully tend, to rid us gradually and entirely, in the United States, of slaves and slavery: " o-reat moral and political evil, of increasing virulence and extent, from ■w-hich much mischief is nov/ felt, and very great calamity in future is justly api)rehended. It is in this point of vieio, I confess, that your scheme of Colonization most strongly recotiTMEnds itself, in my opinion, to * Laws forbidding emancipation. 21 atltnlion and support.''^ All these sentiments were publicly expressed by the leading members of the society, at or before the first annual meeting, and published in the first report. After quoting them in the third report,* the Managers remark : — " From the preceding extracts from the first annual report of the American Colonization Society, the public may decide whether the charge be as true, as it has been gravely affirmed, that, ' In the Constitution and proceedings of the American Colonization Society, or in the avowed sentiments of its members, there can be discerned nothing friendly to the abolition of slavery in the Uni- ted States." In the second report,f the Managers say : — " It [the Soci- ety] has been suggested to be an invention of the southern proprietor to rivet the chains of servitude upon the slaves ; as if the circumstances which accompanied the origin of the Society, the character of its mem- bers, and their solemn and reiterated declarations, did not forbid so un- founded an imputation. It would not be more uncandid to ascribe to them a design to invade the rights of private property, secured by the constitution and laws of the several slave holding states, and proclaim universal emancipation." At the ninth annual meeting, tlie following resolution was adopted : — " Resolved, That the Society disclaims, in the most unqualified terms, the designs attributed to it, of interfering, on the one hand, with the legal rights and obligations of slavery, and on the other, of perpetuating its existence Avithin the limits of this country,":!: At the eleventh annual meeting were the following remarks : — " It has been said that this society was an invasion of the rights of slave hold- ers. Sir, if it is an invasion, it comes not from without. It is an irrup- tion of liberality, and threatens only that freemen will overrun our south- ern country — that the soil will be fertilized by the sweat of freemen ALo>'£, and what are now deserts, will flourish and blossom under the in- fluence of enterprise and industry. * * * * Yes ! kings might be proud of the effects which this Society will have produced. Far more glorious than all their conquests would ours be, for it would be the tri- umph of FREEDOM ovcr SLAVERY — of liberality over prejudice, and of humanity over the vice and ivretchedness which ever tcait on ignorance and servitude."^ At the 14th Annual Meeting, it was said by one who is now a Vice President, and pays $100 a year to the Society : — "We admit that in this way, that is, through the renovation of Africa, the Colonization So- ciety may exert an important influence on the question of Slavery, — an influence which may yet compass the abolition of Slavery in our laud. But, mark you. Sir, it is a way that leads through a change — through the willingness of the master's mind, and therefore he cannot object to it. Whilst the society protest, that it has no designs on the rights of the master in the Slave, or the property in the Slave, which the laws guarantee to him ; it does nevertheless admit, and joyfully admit, that the successful prosecution of the object of the Society, must produce mor- al influences, and moral changes, leading to the voluntary emancipation of the Slave, not only in our country but throughout the world."\\ In the Appendix to the 14th Report,t is an article copied from the African Repository, which the managers say developes " the true prin- * See pp 95, 99. t P- 9. t Xintli Report. * (S Proceedings at annual meeting, eleventh report, pp 24, 25. II Speech of Gerret Smith. 14 Rep. p 12. 22 ciples and character of the Society." After quoting largely from the early documents of the Society, the writer remarks : — " From the con- stitution of the Society, the recorded opinions and proceedings of its Founders, it is obvious, " 1. That those who established the Society, looked for aid to the States and to the National Government, and that they bound themselves by their Constitution to' co-operate, if practicable, with these powers in ef- fecting their object. " 2. That they had no desire or intention of interfering, in any way, with the rights or the interests of the proprietors of Slaves. "3. That they considered Slavery a great moral and political evil, and cherished the hope and belief, that the successful prosecution of their object would offer powerful motives and exert a persuasive injliience i.\ fa- vor OF VOLUNTARY EMANCiPATioiv." * * * It is equally plain and undeniable, that the Society, in the prosecution of this work, has never interfered, or evinced even a disposition to interfere, in any way, witli the rights of proprietors of Slaves. But it may be said, that the Socie- ty has expressed the opinion that Slavery is a moral and political evil and that it has regarded the scheme of Colonization as presenting mo- tives, and exerting a moral influence at the South, favorable to gradual and voluntary emancipation. This is true, and it is this, beyond all ques- tion, which has secured to it the countenance and patronage of our most profound and sagacious Statesmen, and given to this scheme a peculiar attractiveness and glory in the view of the enlightened friends of their country and mankind. "And is the Society to be held up as odious and dangerous, because it entertains and avows the opinion that Slavery is an evil ? Is not this a truth inscribed, as it were, upon the firmament of Heaven, and the face of the world, and the heart of men ? Would not the denial of it be a denial of the fundamental principle of all Free Government ? * * * * " The hostility manifested towards the American Colonization Society has not been excited, then, by any departure of the Society from the de- sign and the principles which it avowed at its origin ; nor yet from any- thing in its character or proceedings unfriendly to the rights and inter- ests of the Southern States. It is the success of the Society, it is the fulfilment of the hopes and predictions of its founders, that has awaken- ed the desperate and malignant spirit which now comes forth to arrest its progress. Voluntary emancipation begins to folloiv in the train of Colonization, and the advocates of perpetual Slavery are indignant at witnessing in effectual operation a scheme which permits better men than themselves to exercise, without restraint, the purest and noblest feelings of our nature. These strenuous asserters of the right to judge for themselves in regard to their domestic policy, are alarmed at a state of things which secures the same right to every individual of their com- munity. Do they apprehend that the system which they would perpet- uate cannot continue unimpaired, unless the privilege of emancipating his Slaves for the purpose of Colonization shall be denied to his master ? Do they feel that in this country and this age the influences of truth and freedom are becoming too active and powerful, and that all their forces nrtist be summoned to the contest with these foes to their purposes and their doctrines ? 23 " If so, their defeat is inevitable. Such men have more to do than to counteract the efforts of our Society. Few and feeble, even in the States of the South, they must gird themselves for warfare against all the friends of virtue and liberty — of man and God. A true son of Vir- ginia has said, "I may be permitted to declare that I would be a Slave holder to-day without scruple. But, I hold it due to candor to say, that if there be a Statesman in the United States, and I believe there are two or three such, who is content that ive shall always hold them in ser- vitude, and would advice us to rest contented ivith them, vs and our poster- ity, without seeking or accepting, means of liberating ourselves and them, he deserves a heavier vengeance than the orator's bile — the curses of America counseled to her ruin, and of outraged Africa. Let me not be considered haish ; for inasmuch as the piratical trader of human be- ings, on the African coast, the master of the Slave-ship, is the most de- testable of monsters in action, so, I must say, is the advocate by cool ar- gument of Slavery in the abstract, odious in thought." The following extracts are from an Article on the " Character and in- fluence of the Colonization Society," in the African Repository for Sep- tember, 1831. " Let us consider tlie moral influence of the Society on the system of slavery. Here it seems proper to remark, that the Society has no influence upon slavery, excepting a. moral influence. It embraces in its provisions only the free It does not interfere, — it desires not to interfere, in any wa}', with the rights or the inter- ests of the proprietors of slaves. * * * * But although slavery is untouched by any direct operations of the Society, its moral influence is working safely, exten- sively, and effectually, in favor of voluntary emancipation. The Society arose, and has been sustained, by a spirit of benevolence to the unfortunate, and by confer- ring blessings in the legitimate sphere of its operations ; it sets an example, which many a noble minded master of slaves has rejoiced to imitate. It shows how emancipation may be effected with benefit to the slave, and without detriment to the public welfare. It offers the most powerful motives to the humanity and reli- gion of the master, and takes away all excuse for perpetuating slavery on the ground of political necessity. It shows how the evil may be removed, and thus silently invites individuals and States to adopt measures for this end, &c."* In the Appendix to the 15th Annual Report, are the following re- marks copied from Mr. Carey's letters : — " Among the most promising and encouraging circumstances attending the career of the Society, are the numerous manumissons that have taken place in almost all the slave States, with the express condition of the freed men being sent to Libe- ria. These manumissions have occurred on a scale that the most san- guine friends of the scheme could not have anticipated. Entire families have been blessed with their freedom, from the most pure motives, a con- viction of the injustice and immorality of slavery — and in many cases, ample provision has been made for the expense of their passage, and in some, for their support in Liberia." After giving the names of several persons who have liberated or offered to liberate slaves to the number of some hundreds, the writer remarks : — " It holds out every encourage- ment to the Colonization Society, that the application for the transporta- tion of free negroes and slaves, on condition of removal to Liberia, far exceed its means. There are in North Carolina, and the adjacent states, from three to four thousands of both descriptions ready to embark, were the Society in a situation to send them away."t *pp200,201. f 15 Report p. 42. 24 In a letter* dated Nov. 17, 1832, the Secretary of the Society says : "We fear not, then, to try the question of the influence of the Coloniza- tion Society upon the system of slavery, and tve feel prepared to maintain that it tends, more than all other means and measure existing or possible, to produce, in the best manner, the abolitio7i of slavery." In support of this opinion, he illustrates the following positions : 1st. "That the nature of the influence exerted by the Society, on the system of slavery, is solely a moral infuence. It brings together tlierefore and unites, on common and unobjectionable grounds, in promo- ting this influence, the humane, patriotic and pious of every State and section of the Union. 2nd. " By inviting the attention and reflections of the people of the South, to the subject of the whole colored population." 3rd. " Demonstrates by actual experiment, hoiv emancipation may be ef- fected without detriment to the public, and with immense benefit to the slaves." 4th. " By elevating the character of men of color in Liberia, the So- ciety tends to produce feelings of sympathy and respect for the colored- race throughout our country, and the ivorld." * * * " Is a fact most pertinent to the object of this letter, and worth a thousand arguments, that while Mr. Garrison is representing the Colo- nization Society as hostile to abolition and tending to strengthen and perpetuate the system of slavery, nearly every friend of perpetual slave- ry at the South is an enemy to the Society ; and the only opposition that I am aware of at the South, arises from the conviction among the enemies of any and all abolition, that the tendency of the Society is to promote the voluntary abolition of slavery. Are the enemies of the So- ciety at the South in circumstances less favorable than Mr. Garrison, for the formation of a correct judgement on this subject.-'" At the last Annual Meeting, R. S. Finley, Esq. ^yho has traveled as an agent in all the slave states, made the following remarks : — "It will be borne in mind, that a prominent object of this institution is to affbrd the means for a safe, gradual, and voluntary abolition of slavery. And it is this view of the subject that constitutes its chief glory in the eye of its slave holding friends. * * * * I have publicly discussed this subject every where in the Southern states, from the Eastern shore of Maryland to the Gulf of Mexico, in the presence of hundreds of slaves at a time, and with the general approbation of the audience to which my addresses were delivered — and have uniformly represented it as aflx)rding the best, and only safe means of gradually and entirely abolishing slave- ry. Indeed, so well is the moral influence of the operations, of this So- ciety understood in the extreme South, that all the advocates of perpet- ual slavery are bitterly opposed to it, and none in that region are its ad- vocates, but the friends of gradual, peaceful, and ultimate, entire emanci- pation. In fine, this Society is drawing the line in a distinct manner, between these two clases of people at the South. The friends of hu- man liberty are enlisting under the banner of Colonization, and the ad- vocates of perpetual despotism are arranging themselves under the ban- ner of its adversaries."! At the same meeting G. W. P. Curtis, Esq. said : — " Some alarmists tell us the slave population is to be freed. And * Letter of Mr. Gurley, published in N. Y. Spectator and other papers. 1 16 ^''P- 25 sir, does any one regret that the hope is held out, that, with our own consent, we shall one day see an end of slavery ? Should this Society be, as I doubt not it will, the happy means of producing this result, it will be renowned as having done one of the greatest and best deeds that have blessed the world." Rev. William J. Armstrong, of Richmond Virginia, under date of Aug. 14, 1832, writes : " It is a fact that just in proportion as the Colonization Society has become popular in any part of this country, just in that pro- portion the subject of emancipation has been discussed and become popu- lar. And hundreds of masters in all tliis region are looking now with anxious eyes to the growth of the colony and the prosperity of the So- ciety, as opening a door for them to bestow freedom on their slaves. Mul- titudes of the young men, too, who will inherit many of these people, are patronising this Society, in the hope that it will enable them to emanci- pate compatibly with the good of the slaves and the community. Under present circumstances, emancipation with a view of remaing here, is not in most cases a benefit to the slaves. It is not so regarded by a majori- ty of the more intelligent slaves. Multitudes of them Avould be very unwil- ling, (if they may be credited in what they say,) to exchange conditions M-ith the /ree colored people, I wonder Mr. G. and his friends at the North are not a little startled to find themselves in their opposition to the Society, co-operating with the class of persons at the South, who are the advocates for the perpetual existence of slavery, either upon the ground that it is really no evil, but rather a benefit ; or, though an evil, yet is one that cannot possibly be removed, and must therefore be managed in tlie best way practicable. All the opposers to the Society here, so far as I am acquainted, belong to this class. All who hope for, or aim at the ultimate removal of this evil, on the ground of policy, or justiee, or benevolence, are unanimous in patronizing the Colonization Society. * * * I see Mr. Clay is often quoted by Mr. Garrison, for sentiments condemnatory of the Society. Are you aware that Mr. Clay is, and always has been an Abolitionist? When the constitution of Kentucky was formed, he made great efforts, and came very near succeding, to exclude slavery from that State. It is a little remarkable that in the movements now taking place in Kentucky, which must tend before long to the abolition of slavery there, the children of the two men who were Mr. Clay's success- ful opposers, in the formation of the Constitution of the State, Brecken- ridge and Nicholas, are the leading persons. They are ardent friends of Colonization, and most of them have emancipated their slaves, or stand pledged to do it as soon as they can be removed. Throughout Virginia, and, I presume North Carolina, and the States West of them, a large majority of the Slave holders look forward to the ultimate entire removal of Slavery, as a result that must come, and is greatly to be desired, pro- vided it can be brought about without violent convulsions to deluge the land in blood. Many are forming their plans, and educating their chil- dren with a view to this result ; and the number of such is increasing." In reply to the question. Does the success of the Colonization Society tend to rivet the chains of the Slaves ? Dr. Palmer, of Charleston, S. C. writes: "Far — very far otherwise. It is universally, both hy friends and foes, considered as operating directly the other way. Hence its foes hate it mortally, and its friends are too timid to attempt its vindication'\ In re- 26 ply to the inquiry, can it be truly proved to have the contrary effect 7 his answer is yes, easily and abundantly." Gerrit Smith, a distinguished friend both of Colonization and emancipa- tion, writes : " The recent demonstrations in Virginia and Maryland, of patriotic and christian interest in our colored population are commonly ascribed to the Southampton insurrection. * * * But in my judgment, Virginia and Maryland are vastly more indebted, for the steps they have taken in the cause of freedom, to the moral injluencc of the American Col- onization Society than to all other causes. And may not most of those who now rail at the Colonization Society, be likewise indebted to those same influences for their fresh and augmented interest in the welfare of the black-man ? The tenacious slave holder at the South, lays all the blame of these things at the door of the Colonization Society ; and this too, notwithstanding the abolitionists, charge the Society with playing design- edly into the hands of such slave holders. And if such be the power of these moral influences now, when Liberia has a population of but 3000, what will it be when 50,000 of our blacks shall be gathered into that Asylum ? Will it not be so great then as to loosen the bonds of our millions of slaves and set them free ?" A letter from a gentleman in St. Louis Missouri, says, that " the Col- onization Society is popular among all classes," and that " a great change has taken place within ten years in the State on the subject of slavery." " Persons in the State, now hold themselves ready to emancipate, when- ever their slaves can be removed to Africa, whilst to remain in this coun- try they would not think of it." The Hon. Willard Hall, of Wilmington Delaware, writes : " I know of no advocates of perpetual slavery amongst the members or friends of the Colonization Society. I am opposed to slavery utterly. I never held but two persons that could be called slaves : each of these was en- titled to freedom at the age of 21 years. It is now many years since I held either of them. I consider slavery a bane. I believe the Coloni- zation Society does promise more for the abolition of slavery than every other means hitherto tried." " Emancipation is going on fast in this State. We have no insurrections nor causes."* The preceding extracts together with the history and operations of the Colonization Society, establish the following positions. 1. That most of the leading founders of the Society, expected its mor- al influence would tend to the voluntary emancipation of slaves. 2. That some slave holders among its founders who held a diflferent opinion, have since abandoned the Society, on the ground that it does tend to emancipation, 3. That the Board of Managers have believed and do still believe that this is its tendency. 4. That more than 700 Slaves have been emancipated and removed in consequence of the influence of the Society, and that great numbers are now anxious to emancipate their slaves, for removal to Liberia, who are prevented by law from emancipating them to remain here, and who be- lieve that, under existing circumstances, freedom in this country would not benefit their slaves, * For several of the extracts abovo quoted, the author is indebted to the gentlemen to whom the letters were addressed and who have kindly permitted him to use them in this place. a7 5. That those who would perpetuate slavery — the enemies of eman- cipation at the South, oppose the Colonization Society when they un- derstand its tendency. 6. That those who are friends to peaceful emancipation are clustering around it. 7. That in those slave states where the Colonization Society first be- came popular, the people are most nearly prepared for legislative enact- ments in favor of emancipation. 8. That in these states the discussions and measures which have drawn public sentiment so far in the right direction, have been led on by the friends of Colonization, and in immediate connexion with Coloniza- tion efforts. 9. That the publications of the Society, and the success of the Colo- ny have done much to awaken discussion at the South, and turn public sentiment in favor of emancipation. In advocating the Colonizati.on system, it is by no means necessary to approve every thing that has been done, or every argument and motive which has been used by its friends. Before giving reasons for support- ing the Society, I am disposed to concede some things for the sake of be- ing better understood. 1. I do not approve of the traffic in ardent spirits, which some of the Colonists have carried on with the natives. This traffic ought to cease all over the world, and the best measures should be adopted to secure this result. The Managers of the Colonization Society* evidently entertain this opinion in relation to Liberia. The Secretary, in a letter to Roberts Vaux, Esq. dated June 26, 1832, says, "To prohibit absolutely the in- troduction of ardent spirits into the Colony, is believed to be impossible. This article is subject, however, to a heavy duty, and the expense of a licensef to retail it is such as to amount to a prohibition. Tracts on the subject of Temperance have been sent to the Colony, and the best moral means adopted to encourage the settlers watchfully and diligently to cul- tivate this all-important virtue." 2. / do not suppose the Society will remove the ivhole colored population from this country. Probably many of this class will prefer remaining here, and if all desired to go to Africa, " the managers have ever con- sidered the national or State governments as alone adequate to their re- moval." It was this view which led them in forming tlie Constitution to declare that, "the Society shall act in co-operation Avith the General gov- ernment, or such of the States as may adopt regulations on the subject." 3. / do not suppose the Society alone, ivill liberate all the slaves in this country. This is not its business. Its only influence on slavery, is a moral influence. To turn aside from its proper sphere to direct efforts for the abolition of slavery, would be a violation of its Constitution and an unwarrantable perversion of its funds. 4. I do not approve of all the arguments and motives which have been urged by the advocates of the system. Sentiments which I cannot adopt,^ are to be' found in each of the publications named at the head of this article. Some individuals have denied the right of the colored race to a home in this country. Some have said that slaves ought not to be liberated unless they are removed from the country. I have no faith in *See Af. Repos., JuneI8;S, p. 12S. f The expense of a license is said to be $300. 28 these doctrines. Slaves ought to be liberated as soon as they can be with benefit to themselves, and free men of color have a right to remain here if they choose. Some have doubtless spoken too strong in describ- ing the wretched condition of the colored race, and too despairingly in re- lation to their elevation in this country. Probably a description of the free colored people as they are found in the slave States, would not ap- ply to the same class in New England. 5. Some may have patronized the Society from wrong motives ; from a prejudice against color, and a consequent desire for its removal; from a sense of danger — fear of insurrection — and some at the South may have given money for this object with the hope of thereby rendering slaves and slavery more secure. It is certain that some who once favored the Soci- ety, now oppose it, on the ground that it tends to emancipation. 6. It is possible that the Board of Managers, or individual members of it, may have said injudicious things, or may have committed mistakes. They are men and liable to err in thought, word, or deed, like other men, and their sphere of labor has been one of peculiar delicacy and trial. If they have departed in the least from the Constitution and the established .principles of the Society, or in the management of its affairs have com- mitted any error, I do not, in defending the Society, approve such depar- ture, or justify their errors. Having said this, it is proper to express the full conviction, growing out of a tolerably thorough examination of the subject, that whoever acquaints himself with the operations of the Soci- ety, and the difficulties with which the Managers have had to contend, will be astonished at finding so little in their management to censure. But if there had been mismanagement even to a great extent, and this were clearly proved, it would be as unreasonable to abandon the Society for this reason, as it Avould be to abandon Christianity because it has sometimes been perverted, or has had bad advocates. On the contrary, it would of itself be a sufficient reason why good men should rally around it. The Society is a powerful engine ; and if there is the least danger of its perversion, the friends of humanity should at once lay hold of it, and give it a right direction. As a citizen of New England, I feel bound to aid the American Colonization Society, and for the following reasons : 1. It benefits the free people of color who accept its offers and re- move to Liberia. This no one will doubt who believes the testimony of the Colonists themselves, of their agents and instructors, of intelligent men of color, Avho have visited the colony with a view to emigration, or of distinguished naval officers from this country, Great Britain, and France, who have examined the state of the Colony. 2. If the Society is sustained and accomplishes its object, it will con- fer great blessings on Africa. It will aid in suppressing the slave trade. Sierra Leone, with all its embarrassments, has done much in this way. The colony at Liberia oc- cupies a territory which was once the seat of the traffic. A merchant from that place stated a few months since, that previous to the com- mencement of the colony, 4000 or 5000 slaves were annually carrjed out of the harbor of Monrovia. " Before the establishment of the settlements at Liberia, there were several slave factories within a few miles of Mon- rovia, all of Avhich have been completely broken up."* " Nothing has *M. Carey's Letter. 29 tended more to suppress the slave trade in this quarter, than the constant intercourse and communication of the natives with these industrious colonists. The American Agent, Mr. Ashmun, took every opportunity and means in his power to extinguish a traffic so injurious in every way to t-he fair trader." " Wherever the influence of this Colony extends, the slave trade has been abandoned by the natives, and the. peaceful pur- suits of legitimate commerce established in its place."* Armed vessels have frequently cruised upon the coast since the commencement of the Colony, and have received essential aid from it, in detecting and punish- ing slave traders. A large number of slave ships have been captured, and the slaves liberated and placed in comfortable circumstances near the Colony or at Sierra Leone, or returned to their native homes. By supplying the native tribes in tlie vicinity with such articles of European, West Indian, or American productions as they need, the Colonists aid in withdrawing them from the slave trade. Several tribes have already place dthemselves under the protection of the Colony, to shield themselves from the ravages of those who would kidnap and sell them ; and others offer to do so. King Boatswain, the commander of the most powerful tribe, which has had intercourse with the Colony, has repeatedly said, " When you will supply my tribe with necessary articles in exchange for our productions, we will sell no more slaves." Let the coast be lined with such colonies, and they will effectually guard the interior. There would be a "living barrier" which the slave dealers could not penetrate. Let them become sufficiently numerous to supply the wants of the na- tive tribes, and this will stop the traffic in flesh and blood. Or let the native tribes become civilized and Christianized, and they will no longer sell each other, nor will civilized men enslave them, or permit them to be enslaved. Let Africa be elevated and take rank among civilized nations, and Americans would no sooner buy or sell Africans than tliey would Frenchmen and Englishmen. " By the same process by which the colonisation of the coast tends to the suppression of the slave trade, it promotes the civilization of the in- terior of Africa." " I know it is said that it is impossible to civilize Af- rica. Why ? Why is it impossible to civilize man in one part of the earth more than another ? Consult history. Was Italy — was Greece the cradle of civilization ? No. As far back as the lights of tradition reach, Africa was the cradle of Science, while Syria, and Greece, and It- aly were yet covered with darkness "f " The destruction of the Cartha- genian annals by the Romans, renders it impossible to enumerate r.ny of her great men, except her warriors. Rome never produced a greater General than Hannibal. Some of his relations were men of great talents in the same department. Jugurtha was superior to most of the Romans who were sent against him. Terence, the dramatist, Avas an African, Christianity and civilization were early introduced into Africa. There were several provincial councils held there, ***** Origen, Ter- tulian, Cyprian, and Augustine, among the great lights of Christianity in their day, were Africans." t That Africans are capable of elevation when surrounded by proper motives, there is no good reason to doubt. The obstacles to their eleva- * Essay on the state of the slave trade on the African coast in the [British] Amulet fur lc32. t E. Everert. * M. Carey. 30 tion in this country, explain their present condition, and furnish no proof that they are incapable of cultivation. The want of education — proper- ty — of character — of good society, and indeed, of all the motives which elevate other men, and render life desirable, explains the facts which speak out from our poor houses and prisons,* without supposing colored people more prone to ignorance, indolence and crime, than the whites would be under similar embarrassments. The short experiment at Libe- ria, shows that they can feel the power of motives and rise in characteri and condition to any desirable extent, and it is not easy to conceive of a more successful method to teach the native Africans civilization and Christianity, than by means of civilized and Christian Colonies, planted by men of their own color — by the descendants of those who were once stolen from among them. Whether colonies Avill exert a good influence on Africa, will of course depend upon their character. If the means of intellectual and moral el- evation are not furnished, or are perverted or neglected, and the Colonists become corrupt, they cannot exert a good influence upon the native tribes, but on the contrary, will present serious obstacles to their im- provement. But if neccssai-y means shall be furnished, and be properly applied : if schools and churches shall arise, and the school master and the missionary of the cross be "abroad," and all the institutions of free government shall be in successful operation, and the native tribes shall witness these advantages, they will desire to enjoy them. They will plead with increasing earnestness for these institutions and strive with new- zeal to imitate the manners of those whose protection they already seek. The cry, " Come over and help us" which has commenced on the coa^t, will wax louder and louder. It will extend into the interior and will eclu; " From many an ancient river — '■ From many a palmy plain," till it shall disturb the death-like slumber — the cruel apathy and indiffer- ence which has so long existed in relation to the wrongs of Africa, and rouse all Christendom for her relief. The cry of Africa will be heard. It has already entered the ears of the Lord of Sabbaoth, and those who bear the Saviour's image, and regard his parting command, will soon be moved by it. It will be seen and felt that Africa has one claim upon the American missionary, which no other heathen land can plead with soj much propriety. It is that of eternal justice. It will also be seen that Liberia presents a noble opportunity for meeting this claim. It opens a channel of intercourse, through which science and religion may flow in- to the heart of that continent. It is an opening in her dark forests- through which the star of Bethlehem gleams, and the beams of the sun of Righteousness can penetrate and diffuse life, and happiness, and hope, among a hundred millions. * In Mass. in 1826, nearly 1-Cth part of the convicts were colored, while only 1-7-lth part of the whole population was of this description. In Conn. l-34th part of the popuhition was colored, and 1-3 of the convicts. In Vermont, the whole coloied population was 918, from whom 24 were furnished for the penitentiary. In New York, l-34th part of ttie population were colored, and about l-4tli of the convicts. In New Jersey, M3th part of the population were colored, l-3d of the convicts. In Pennsylvania, l-34th pari of tlie population were colored, and l-3d of the convicts. i Massachusetts, Connecticut, and New York, paid for the support of their colored convicts in ( ten years' previous to 182fi, $104,OiiG, while the colored population of these States was less than i ce rrcsiacnts. Michael H. Simpson, Trefls. At the monthly meeting in February, it was voted "that a copy of the Constitu- tion and address of the Society be sent to all the editors of newspapers," and '' to every Clergyman in New England, earnestly soliciting his co-operation in pro- moting the objects of the Society." Although the Constitution has no allusion to African Colonization, more than one-third of the address is devoted to opposing the Colonization Society. During the year, Mr. Garrison published his 'Thoughts' on Colonization, which he commends to the " attention of the two most powerful classes in this country — Editors of newspapers, and the Clergy ,"§ as 'tlie power- ful influence of the Clergy is to be brokcn.'\\ In January, 1H33, the Abolitionist was commenced by the Society ; edited by a Committee. During the same month, the First Annual JNIeeting was held, and the First Report, with an Appendix, has recently appeared from the press of Garrison &• Knapp, in a pamphlet of 54 pages. The Report and numbers of the Abolitionist already issued, show that the Man- * Address, p. 14. t I'J- iP- I'i'- etc. ^p. 38. |ip. T. 40 agers adopt Mr. Garrison's opposition to the Colonization Society, and make it a prominent part of their oliject. More than half the Report is occupied by an attack upon the Colonization Society, and the reasons why "they denounce and oppose it," are given in the true style and spirit of his "Thoughts." Speaking of their success, the Managers say, " With feeble means, the Society has produced great results. It lias constantly employed it3 Presiding officer as an Agent for the past six niontlis, to go forth to the people, and urge its claims upon their cl)arities and confidence. His labors, it is believed, have been extensively useful. Tiie Managers bear honorable testimony to his zeal, faithfulness and ability. Other agents have been successfully employed for a shorter period. J'ive thousand copies of the Constitution and address of the Society have been printed for gratuitous distribution. A liberal pur- chase has been made of Mr, Garrison's "Thouirhts on African Colonization," for a similar purpose. The Society has efiecledi the cmancii>ation of a young slace-boij in this city by a suit AT Lvw. It is now making strenuous exertions for the establishment of a Manual Labor School, for the education of colored youth, and will probably attain its object. It has effected the con- version of a multitude of minds to the doctrine of immediate abolition, and given a wide and sal- utary check to the progress of the Colonization Society.''* From the Liberator, it appears that the President, Mr. Buffum, while giving ad- dresses on Slavery, frequently attacked the Colonization Society.! Mr. Johnson, the i)resent Recording Secretary, | lectured in 1.5 or 20 places in New England du- ring the last year, and in some, if not all ofthem, attackodthe Colonization Socie- ty. Mr. Garrison, while travelling in Maine as an Agent of the Anti Slavery So- ciety, attended a meeting called by the friends of Colonization, and occupied a con- siderable portion of two evenings in opposing the Society. § He has frequently lec- tured against the Society in Massachusetts. An effort has been made by officers of the Society to prejudice benevolent in- dividuals in Great Britian against the Colonization System. Mr. Garrison wrote to James Cropper, in May 1832. Mr. Buffamalso has written to him and to Thom- as Clarkson. The prominent object of these letters, and the documents sent with them, seems to have been to persuade them that the Colonization Society is a "con- spiracy against human rights." They have been successful in persuading James Cropper, Joseph Phillips, and Capt. Charles Stuart to oppose the Society, b}' publishing objections to it gathered from the " letters — Thoughts — and — Lib- erator" of Mr. Garrison : and their comnmnications furnish new materials for the New Eng-land Anti Slavery publications.il It has seemed to be necessary to trace the movements of the Sociely thus mi- nutely, as the constitution does not explain all the objects which the Society is aiming to accomplish. " The objects of the Society shall be, to endeavor by all means sanctioned by law, humanity and religion, to effect the abolition-of slavery in the United States; to improve the condition of the free people of color, to improve and correct public opinion in relation to their situation and rights, and obtain for them equal civil and political rights and privileges with the whites."** Who would suppose from this article that the Anti Slavery Society is devoting a prominent part of its efforts to opposing the Colonization Society.'' As a citizen of New England, I cannot but desire the abolition of slavery, and the elevation of the people of color to freedom and happiness; but there are rea- sons why I cannot co-operate with the Nev^ England Anti Slavery Society, which a sense of duty urges me to state thus publicly. Before doing this, it seems necessa- ry to express more fully my views in relation to slavery, and the objects of the So- ciety as stated in the Constitution. I believe, 1. That slavery is a moral wrong, and a great political evil — a curse both to the slave, the master and the nation. 2. That slaves ought to be liberated as soon as they can be with benefit to them- selves, and without producing evils greater than slavery itself, and that it is the interest as well as rfw^i/ of proprietors and States, to pursue the best means for ef- fecting this purpose. 3. That there are but two ways in which they can be emancipated : one of these is by force, the other by the consent of their masters. 4. That we have no right, civil or religious, to liberate them by force, or pursue such means as would tend to insurrections. o. That as slavery is a national evil, and as New England ships, and seamen, and capital were actively employed in enslaving the fathers, it is right that the citi- zens of New England should share the labor and expense of giving freedom and happiness to the children. *p. 42. t See his letters in the Liberat'br for six months previous to February 1. JLibcr- itor, Jan 12, over the signature of R. N. iS See Kennebeck Journal, Oct. 12, j832. ]| Letter of Joseph Phillips, Lib. Dec. 15, 1832. **Constitution, Article 2. 41 (J. That whatever can be done by the people of New England, in a spirit of kind- ness, to assist the proprietors of slaves to think and act right on this whole subject, IS a reasonable duty. 7. Calling them hard names, insulting or abusing, or pursuing measures fitted to exasperate them, is not likely to produce right feelings or action among proprie- tors, or benefit their slaves. 8. That the free colored people in this country have strong claims upon our sym- l)athy and assistance ; and while those who desire it should be assisted to remove :n Liberia, those who remain in this country should be furnished with means of ducation and every possible facility for becoming good citizens. 9. That whatever tends to make them jealous of the whites andexjcite bitter and vindictive feelings, is not fitted to make them good citizens, or secure for them the respect and assistance tiiey need. >■ 10. That to circulate among the free blacks of Nev/ England, publications, which, if circulated in the slave States, would necessarily tend to insurrection, is injurious to the colored people, and 7iot sanctioned hy kno, humanity, or religion.^ in relation to the founders and patrons of the New England Anti Slavery Soci- oty, I am happy to admit, 1. That they ardently desire to benefit the whole colored race, and are willing to •make vigorous efforts for this purpose. 2. That some of them have manifested a zeal and perseverance worthy of this noble enterprize. 3. That in their publications there are many noble sentiments, worthy of the approbation of all men. 4. To the objects of the Society, as expressed in the second article of the Consti- tution, if properly pursued, I could have no objection. But I cannot co-operate with the Society, 1 . Because it opjioses the Colonization Society, although no provision is made for this in the Constitution. After the most thorough examination, this opposition seems to me unreasonable ; audit is bad policy to tear down a Society which is proved to be a good one, for the sake of building up another of doubtful tendency, and one which, if suc- cessful, would render the former indispensable. If the Anti Slavery Society could persuade the Southern people to emancipate all their slaves this year, there would be more work for the Colonization Society than ever before. Take an illustration. In Virginia, are several thousand free blacks, but few of whom are proprietors of land, and the greater part are miserably poor, either for want of employment or disposition to labor. Several thousand slaves are annually sold from Virginia in- to other States, still leaving enough to perform the labor. Let the masters eman- cipate and hire their laborers, they will pursue the policy of the northern farmer, — hire the best workmen and as few of them as can do his work. As free men perform more labor than slaves, a much smaller number would be employed, and consequently, a large number would be thrown out of employment : the.se added to the thousands now annually sold from the state, and the other thousands previ- ously free, would make up an immense surplus population unemploj'cd, and un- provided for, which must have a vent somewhere. It would surely be a work of mercy to furnish a home in Africa for those who might desire it, and to oppose the Colonization Society, or prejudice the colored people against it, would be to them an act of extreme cruelty. But the spirit and manner of this opposition are pecu- liarly objectionable. Mr. Garrison's ' Thoughts,' of which 'a liberal jmrchasc has hccninade hy the Jl?iti Slavery Society for gratuitous distribution,' abound in griev- ous charges and hard names. " I am prepared to show that those who have entered into tlii.s conspiracy against hu- man RIGHTS, are unanimous in abusing their victims: unanimous in their mode of attack: unanimous in proclaiming the absurdity that our free blacks are natives of Africa : unanimous in * " r deem it to be my duty to express to you, at this time, my opinion, that to publish books, pamplilcts, or newspaper.-;, designed to be circulated liere and in other States of tlio Union, and having a necessary tendency to excite in the minds of our citizens deadly hatred and hostility against their brethren of other States, and to stimulate the slave population of those States to rise against their masters, and to effect by fire and sword their emancipation, is an offence against this commonwealth, and that it may be prosecuted as a misdemeanor, at common law. It is said that pamphlets and papers of such cliaractor have been published in Boston and sent to the Southern States, and that they have caused great alarm and complaint there. It cannot be denied, that it is just cause both of alarm and complaint." Charge of Judge Tkacher to the Oraiu! Jurrj of the County of Suffolk, in March, also in Dec. 1832. t Thoughts, p. 10. See also introduction to this work. 43 propagating the libel, tliat tliey, cannot be elevated and improved in this country '• unanimous in opposing their instruction : unanimous in apologizing tor the crime of slavery, &c.* " It is a conspiracy to send the free people of color to Africa under a benevolent pretence, but really that the slaves may be held more securely in bondage. It is a conspiracy based upon fear, oppres- sion and falsehood, which draws its aliment from the prejudices of the people, which is sustain- ed by duplicity, which really upholds the slave system, which fascinates while it destroys, which tnilangers the safety and happiness of the country, which no precept of the Bible can justify, which is implacable in its spirit, which sliould he annihilated at a blow. " These are my accusations, and if I do not substantiate them, I am willing to be covered with reproach."* "Ye crafty calculators : ye hard hearted iiicoriigible sinners I ye greedy and relentless robbers ! ye contemners of justice and inercy ! ye trembling, pitiful, pale-faced usurpers ! ray soul spurns you with unspeakable disgust." "The Coloniwtion Cro/l is a diabolical pursuit which a great part of our Christian community are engaged in."t " But to the awful disappointment of all such blasphemers, they will meet the justice of God, which will be to them a devouring sword. "J The report of the Society breathes much of tlie same spirit. After speaking ol it as " not only a burlesque upon moral cntcrprizcs, hut the acme of folly,' the Man- agers say, " T\\t reason, too, which is given by the Colonization Society for this expulsion is monstrous ; and as often as it is urged in any of its reports, or its official organ, or by any of its itinerants, should fill the readers or hearers of the base libel with indignation. It is — that the American peo- ple are so incorrigibly vile, so lost to all sense of shame ; so far beyond repentance, so proscrip- tive in their feelings, so filled with all malice, prejudice and^hate, that, to the latest generation , they will not cease to treat their free colored countrymen in the most tyrannous and dastardly manner, unless they are separated by a breadth of 4,U0() miles. And in order to vindicate this tinnodly spirit, the Managers of the American Colonization Society in their last Annual Bepoit utter this blasphemy, "&:c $ "With such a spirit, I cannot hold fellowship : — such weapons I cannot wield : especially against au institution embodying a great portion of the best men in the nation. With a Society that pursues such measures, I cannot co-operate. 2. The Anti Slavery Society does not give an account of its funds, or the manner of expending them. The Annual report acknowledges donations from four individuals, and the Agent, in his Reports, published in the Liberator, speaks of taking contributions, without stating the amount. But we have no means of ascertaining the eimouni of funds during the last year. Why this omission.'' What was the amount of contributions taken by the Agent in Andover, Woburn, Belchertown, Springfield, Greenfield, and many other places in Massachusetts, Walpole and Keene, N. H and other places which might be named .'' What is the amount of individual do- nations.' and how have the funds been expended ? We are indeed told that a 'lib- eral purchase of Mr. Garrison's Thoughts has been made,' and ' 5,000 copies of the Constitution and Address of the Society have been printed for gratuitous distribution,' and that Agents have been employed to urge the claims of the Soci- eXy ujjon the charities and confidence of the people. || But how much has it cost to make a ' liberal purchase' of a pamphlet of 2'^G pages — which the Methodist Quarterly Review pronounces " a publication essentially slanderous in all ITS pAKTS,"1T and to circulate 5,000 copies of an address, one third of which is an attack upon the Col. Society ? How much does it cost to enable the 'prcsidenV of the Society to travel and " urge its claims on the charities of the people," by tell- ing them that "the object of the Colonization Society was to banish from our land the free people of color; that it has unvaryingly pursuedt his single object; that it still contemplates the entire banishment of 300,0U0 of the free citizens of the United States to the coast of Africa, by means which must be marked with great cruelty and suffering; that the avowed object to be obtained by their banishment is, increased security, permanency and profit to the slave system?"** How large part of the funds has been expended to give " a wide and salutary check to the progress of the Colonization Society .'"'tt How much has been expended in abol- ishing slavery in " the emancipation of a young slave boy in Boston by a suit at law :"tt and how much has been devoted to elevating the free colored people, and in what manner.'' These are subjects on which the citizens of New England need more light, before they can co-operate extensively with the Anti Slavery Society. 3. JVith its course of management thus far, the society is engaged in a hopeless en- terprise. * Thoughts, p. 10. fib. part If, p. G3. J:Ib. p. 64. From an Address before the colored population of Providence, R. I. Nov. 27, 1828. ^ Report, p. 23. ||See Report, p. 42. IT Review of 'Thouglits on African Colonization' in the Methodist Magazine for Jan. 1833. ** Mr, Buffum's repoj^t of his lecture before the Ko.\bury Lyceum, ft Report, p. 42. JJIb. 43 There is no good reason to expect the destruction of tlie Colonization Society by such measures. Notwithstanding the 'wide and salutary check to its progress,' it lias accomplished almost twice as much during the last year as in any preced- ing one. There is little prospect of convincing the American people by such means, that ' the Colonization Society deceives mid misleads the notion ;'* that all who patron- ize it are miserably duped, or are too wicked to do right ; that its Managers are guilty of ' hlasphemy;' \ or its Agents o? wnntonhj promulgating gross fictions, es- PRESSLV TO DECEIVE." &C.+ niis-stating the principles and opciations of the Col. Society, and gulling the ignorant and thoughtless into a support of a most nefarious scheme,"^ or triumphing '6?/ «ioW deception, \\ or that the Iriends of Colonization are " unanimous in abusing their victims," " propagating libels," or " opposing the in- struction of tlie colored people.* Tlierc is little hope of the 'peaceful abolition of slavery in this way. It is now sev- eral years since Mr. Garrison commenced his efforts, and the Southern people surely have not been ignorant of them. He was imprisoned in Maryland. The Legislature of Georgia has offered $.5000 for his apprehension, and the Committee of Vigilance of Charleston, S. C. offered ^1500 more. The Executive of Virgin- ia, it is said, has taken public notice of him. All these circumstances are pecu- liarly fitted to give his efforts notoriety, add 'oil to the fire of his zeal' and excite sympathy among those who abhor slavery. Although the Society has existed but one j'ear, the Managers say " It has jiroduccd great results." '• It has done more to make slavery a subject of national investigation, to excite discussion, and tf maintain the freedom of speech on a hitlierto prohibited theme, than all other So- cieties now in operation." And it has emancipated one young slave in Bos- ton ! I !** While the Society has done so much 1o abolish slavery, the Report states, " with- in the last two years-, the legislatures of Maryland, Virginia, South Carolina, Lou- isiana, Alabama, and Tennessee have passed laws respecting the free colored and slave population of those States, which are in the highest degree atrocious. "tt It also exhorts abolitionists to bear meekly " the taunts and reproaches of half- wa)' reformers, and temporizing gradualists, who accuse them of provoking slave holders to treat their slaves more rigorously than ever. "It For one, I despair of the peaceful aholition of slavery by such measures as have been pursued, whether I judge from their character or their actual results ;§§ and finally, I despair of per- * Garrison's Thoughts. f An. Eep. p. 23. J Liberator, Feb. 2, 1833. $ lb. Dec. 29, 1832. II Abolitionist, No. 1, pace 7. ** Supreme Judicial Court Dec. 4, 1832. Before Shaw, Chief Justice. A habeas cmyus was brouglit against Mrs. Howard, a lady who had resided in the Island of Cuba, in order to have the body of Francisco, a colored boy, 12 or 14 years of age, (whom it was alleged that the defendant intended to carry to the Island of Cuba, and there keep or sell as a slave,) brought before the Court. - The defendant, in her return to the habeas corpus, stated in writing, that the hoy, Francisco, ipas her servant, that he was free, and that she did not claim him as a slave." After hearing tlip evidence and arguments on both sides, and '■'after examining Francisco privately, and ascertaining that it was his desire to (jo with Mrs. Iloicard," Chief Justice Shaw gave an opinion of whicli the following is the conclusion. " The Court must act as the boy's guardian. He appears to be attached to i' Kvcry American Slave holder is the originator of Slavery; a Kidnajiper, whose turpitude is more ncjarious and criminal, than any of the human Flesh Traders who ever pirated on the coast of Africa 1 I am prepared to demonstrate the truth of this le.vt ; &c.'>— iii. March 9, 1833. 46 can seems to have been formed in this country ; — to slander lum, revile him, tread him under foot.^— .4 tygcr's ski7i is thrown upon him ; and then what a rush of men and dogs .'* Is this the spirit of the " beloved disciple" — is it the spirit of Christ? or is it the spirit ol Mr. Garrison ? Is it the style of the New Testament ? or of the Lib- erator, which the writer calls •' Mr. Garrison's admirable paper ?"i Are not the challenges and communications of " one who has rights " and of '■' \\ ATCH3IAN " and •■■ poLiTicus " legitimate fruits of the seed sown in the Libera- tor and other publications of Mr. Garrison ? Many of the correspondents of the Liberator furnish abundant evidence of their sentiments having been " chann;cd " i.ir formed by his writings, if they had not frankly confessed it. Their communica- tions, show in the language of Professor Wright, " That William Lloyd Garrison has come down upon [them] like a thunder bolt.''t But do such " thnndcr-bolts " purify the moral atmosphere, and compose tlie warring elements in this day of ex- citement.' Do men wlio are thus tltundirstruck become better fitted to act right r — to do to others as they would that others should do to them .' Do these men, as they become familiar with such writings, increase in their '■'■long-suffering' and '•gentleness " and "charity," as well as their zeal? Judging from the nature of the human mind, or from an acquaintance with some who applaud these writings, I canuot resist the painful conviction that the reverse is true; that the more violent and boisterous passions are thereby nourished, the feelings of kindness and benev- ■;lence withered and lost in the lightning blaze of such thnnder-storms. The same mode of attack, if leveled against any other benevolent enterprise, and pur- sued with similar zeal, would lead astray some minds, and if generally counten- anced would prostrate the noblest charities of the age. Some have engaged in, this opposition doubtless with the purest motives ; but there are those in almost every community who are glad of an ajiology for opposing a benevolent society. Some of this class arc unquestionably joining heartily in this opposition, in the hope that they shall soon stand upon the ruins of the Colonization Society, and attack successtully other societies, which now seem less vulnerable. The spirit of this opposition is the spirit of radicalism ; a spirit with which I have no fellow- ship. d. Another reason why I cannot co-operate with this Society, is, that the managers are furyiishing British Ediiurs and Reviewers icith the most rare materials for slandering this Country. I do not suppose they intend this— they may not have considered the use which will be made of their efforts. They liave sent letters and publications to benev- olent individuals, and enlisted their efforts in opposing the Colonization Society, m oi-der to prevent Mr. Cresson from collecting funds in England. Perhaps this was all they at first intended. But it is known that tliere are those in Great Brit- tain who have a keen relish for the v.ritings of such travellers as Capt. Hall and Madam Trollope, and are disposed to seize every opportunity for saying hard things of the American people. Neither of these writers have furnished more precious morsels for such a taste, than are to be found in the ' Liberator ' and ' Thoughts on African Colonization.' Some in Er»gland are doubtless very glad of these ma- terials at this time. A spirit of Commercial enterprise is exploring with eager ex- pectation the regions opened in Africa by the discovery of the Landers, and the American Colony at Liberia occupies a territory which would be very convenient for the use of British capitalists, engaged in African commerce. And besides, this Colony is becoming no meair rival of Sierra Leone. It is introducing republican principles and American institutions and enterprise into that Continent, in a man- ner which is not fitted to secure the special favor of those who hold us and our in- stitutions in contempt. These considerations will lessen to some extent, the im- portance of British opinions in relation to the American Colonization Society. Allowing that Capt. Stuart, and James Cropper, and Joseph Phillips are actuated by the purest motives in opposing this Society, the people of New England will not think their opinions entirely conclusive, when it is known that they are based upon Mr. Garrison's writings.'^ Cai)t. Stuart has written two pamphlets, winch * Letter of Professor Beriah Green of the Western Reserve College, Genius of Temperance Jlarc!i20. t Lib. Jan. 1633. j Genius of Temperance Vol. 3, No. 41.