1865-1900 THE CONFEDERACY AND THE TRANSVAAL: A people's obligation TO ROBERT E. LEE BY CHAKLES FRANCIS ADAMS A PAPER READ BEFORE THE AMERICAN ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY, AT ITS ANNUAL MEETING IN WORCESTER, MASSACHUSETTS, WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 30TH, 1901 t HOUGHTON, MIFFLIN & CO. BOSTON 1901 1865-1900 THE CONFEDERACY AND THE TRANSVAAL: A people's obligation TO ROBERT E. LEE BY CHARLES FRANCIS ADAMS A PAPER READ BEFORE THE AMERICAN ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY, AT ITS ANNUAL MEETING IN WORCESTER, MASSACHUSETTS, WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 30TH, 1901 f HOUGHTON, MIFFLIN & CO. BOSTON 1901 \ A-G1 ^ A". _.;;_':'^r. THE CONFEDERACY AND THE TRANSVAAL The present seems a sufficiently proper occasion, and this a not inappropriate place, to call attention to a mat- ter sufficiently germane to the purpose of this Society, though hardly as yet antiquarian. Historical in its char- acter, it conveys a lesson of grave present import. One of the most unhappy, and, to those concerned in it, disastrous wars since the fall of Napoleon, is, in South Africa, now working itself to a close apparently still re- mote, and in every way unsatisfactory. There is reason to think that the conflict was unnecessary in its inception ; that by timely and judicious action it might long since have been brought to a close ; and that it now continues simply because the parties to it cannot be brought to- gether to discuss and arrive at a sensible basis of adjust- ment, — a basis upon which both in reality would be not unwilling to agree. Nevertheless, as the cable dispatches daily show, the contest drags wearily along, to the prob- able destruction of one of the combatants, to the great loss of the other, and, so far as can be seen, in utter dis- regard of the best interests of both. My immediate purpose, however, is to draw attention to the hair-breadth escape we ourselves had from a simi- lar experience, now thirty-six years ago, and to assign to whom it belongs the credit for that escape. In one word, in the strong light of passing events, I think it now opportune to set forth the debt of gratitude this reunited country of ours — Union and Confederate, North and South — owes to Robert E. Lee, of Virginia. Most of those here — for this is not a body of young men — remember the state of affairs which existed in the United States, especially in what was then known as the Confederate States, or the rebellious portion of the United States, in April, 1865. Such as are not yet as mature as that memory implies, have read and heard thereof. It was in every respect almost the identical state of affairs which existed in South Africa at the time of the capture of Pretoria by General Roberts, in June a year ago. On the 2d of April, 1865, the Confederate army found itself compelled to abandon the Hues in front of Peters- burg ; and the same day — a very famous Sabbath — Jefferson Davis, hastily called from the church services he was attending, left Richmond to find, if he might, a new seat of government, at Danville. The following morning our forces at last entered the rebel capital. This was on a Monday ; and, two days later, the Confederate Presi- dent issued from Danville his manifesto, declaring to the people of the South that " We have now entered upon a new phase of the struggle. Relieved from the necessity of guarding particular points, our army will be free to move from point to point, to strike the enemy in detail far from his base. If, by the stress of numbers, we should be compelled to a temporary withdrawal from her limits [Virginia], or those of any other border State, we will return until the baffled and exhausted enemy shall abandon in despair his endless and impossible task of making slaves of a people resolved to be free." The poHcy and hne of military action herein indicated were precisely those laid down and pm-sued by the Boer leaders during the last sixteen months. It is unnecessary for me even to refer to the series of events which followed our occupation of Richmond, and preceded the surrender of Appomattox. It is sufficient to say that on the Friday which followed the momentous Sunday, the capitulation of the Army of Northern Vir- ginia had become inevitable. Not the less for that, the course thereafter to be pursued as concerned further resistance on the part of the Confederacy was still to be decided. As his Danville proclamation showed, Jefferson Davis, though face to face with grave disaster, had not for an instant given up the thought of continuing the struggle. To do so was certainly practicable, — far more practicable than now in South Africa, both as respects forces in the field and the area of country to be covered by the invader. Foreign opinion, for instance, was on this point settled ; it was in Europe assumed as a cer- tainty of the future that the conquest of the Confederacy was " impossible." The English journals had always maintained, and still did maintain, that the defeat of Lee in the field, or even the surrender of all the Confederate armies, would be but the close of one phase of the war and the opening of another, — the final phase being a long, fruitless effort to subdue a people, at once united and resolved, occupying a region so vast that it would be impossible to penetrate every portion of it, much less to hold it in peaceful subjection. As an historical fact, on this point the scales, on the 9th of April, 1865, hung wavering in the balance ; a mere turn of the hand would decide which way they were to incline. Thus, on the morning of that momentous day, it was an absolutely open question, an even chance, whether the course which subsequently was pursued should be pursued, or whether the leaders of the Confederacy would adopt the poHcy which President Kruger and Generals Botha and De Wet have in South Africa more recently adopted, and are now pursuing. The decision rested in the hands of one man, the commander of the Army of Northern Virginia. Fairly reliable and very graphic accounts of what took place at General Lee's headquarters in the early morning hours of April 9th have either appeared in print or been told in conversation, and to two of these accounts I propose to call attention. Apparently the second of the interviews described followed close on the first, not more than a couple of hours intervening between them. Of the first, I find this account in a book recently published by John Sargent Wise, entitled " The End of an Era." John Sar- gent Wise is the son of Henry A. Wise, once prominent in our national poHtics. Governor of Virginia in the later "fifties," the father was subsequently a brigadier-gen- eral in the Confederate service. Though in 1865 but a youth of nineteen, John S. Wise was a hot Confederate, and had already been wounded in battle. At the time now in question he chanced to have been sent by Jeffer- son Davis, then on his way to Danville, with dispatches to Lee ; and while seeking Lee's headquarters he came, in the early morning of April 9th, across his father. Gov- ernor and General Wise, in bivouac with his brigade. The father was then nearly sixty years of age, but the son found him wrapped in a blanket, stretched on the ground like a common soldier, and asleep among his men. A typical Southern " fire-eater " of the extreme type, Henry A. Wise was an out-and-out Secessionist and Confederate. Aroused from an uneasy slumber, almost the first wish he expressed was to see General Lee, and he asked impetu- ously of his whereabouts. The son knew where the headquarters of the Confederate commander were, and the two started together to go to them. John S. Wise has described vividly the aspect of affairs as they passed along : " The roads and fields were filled with stragglers. They moved lookmg behind them, as if they expected to be attacked and harried by a pursuing foe. Demoraliza- tion, panic, abandonment of all hope, appeared on every hand. Wagons were rolling along with