ORATION Delivered July 4th, 1851, in the Capitol at Annapolis, BY COL. GEORGE W. HUGHES. Class. Book. .A(. izs\ A T I O DELIVERED ON THE SEVENTY-SIXTH ANNIVERSARY 0i i^t ijihrutiQn nf tjjie INDEPENDENCE OF THE UNITED STATES, ULY 4, 1851, IN THE SENATE CHAMBER OF THE CAPITOL AT ANNAPOLIS. BY COL. GEO. W.' HUGHES. ANNAPOLIS: OFFICE Of THE STATE CAPITOL GAZETTE, Corner of Public Circle and North-east street. 18 5 1. «^ ANNAPOLIS, July 7th, l§5l. Col. Geo. W. Hughes : Dear Sir, — The Committee of Arrangements are very desirous of liaving the interesting and appropriate address, delivered by you in the Senate Chamber of the Capitol, on the occa- sion of our last National Anniversary, placed in their hands for publication, that those who had not the opportunity to hear rnay be gratified by a perusal of the noble and patriotic sen- timents therein contained. As chairman of the committee, I respectfully ask for a copy of yofir address for the pur- pose above specified. I hat^e the honor to be, very respectfully, your obedient servant, THOS. H. O'NEAL, Ch. Com, ofJrrangemenis. WEST RIVER, Md., July 10, 1851. My Deaf Sir, — I ha«^e the honor to acknowledge the receipt of your note of the 7th inst., tequesting a copy of the address delivered by me in Annapolis, on the 4th of the present month, for publication. It is known to the committee of Arrangements, that owing to an accident, a very brief time was allotted to me for the preparation of the Oration ; but I do not feel at liberty to refuse your request, communicated in so kind a manner, and therefore place it at your disposal, "With all its imperfections on its head." Very respectfully, my dear sir, your obedient servant, GEORGE W. HUGHES. To the Hon. Thomas H. O'Neal, Secretary of State, Chairman Committee of Arrange- ments, AnnapoliSj Md. ORATION. My Friends and Fellow-Citizens: Seventy-five years have been inscribed on the dial plate of time since the iathers of tbe Revolution, which separated us from Great Britain, in solemn conclave assem- bled, published to the world the Declaration of Independence, which we have just heard' read, for the maintenance of which they pledged "their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor." This was no idle and unmeaning pledge, for it was made, in the presence of the great Judge of the quick and dead, to whom they appealed for the rectitude. of their inten- tions, and it comprehended almost every thing which men in this world hold in the highest .consideration. From the beginning of time — from the instant when the Supreme -Crsator of the universe called this globe into existence — placed the luminaries in the firmanent, and said "Let there be light, and there was light," the Sun never rose upon a more glorious day, nor one more fraught with the earthly happiness of mankind, than on the 4th of July, 1776. He had sunk in darkness He roi€ in splendor, and as his beams were scaltered over our beautiful country and gilded its mountain to]is, mil- lions bowed in adoration before Iiim and hailed his advent with the reverence of eastern worshipers. ]l was the dawn rf a new creation. The political world was in chaos, and the daik spirit of despotism brooded over its waters. It is true there was occasionally an electric flash — a fitful eruption of the volcano, and a fearful up- heaving of the masses, which indicated for the future a new and better order of things. But intellect was w-anting to fashion these elements into form and consistency, for knowledge, taste and science had combined with power to rivet still closer upon the people, the fetters of ignorance and super- stition. Even in England, the only limited monarchy of that age, the true principles of sovereignty were unknown, and the rights of the people were disregarded — Long and bloody civil and religious wars had formerly desolated that beautiful island, but in the moment of victory, toleration was found to mean only the supremacy of a sect, and liberty the privileges of an or- der. The vo'ces of the working classes — the laboring millions whose sweat and blood had swelled her wealih, filled her coffers, and extended her dominion by land and sea until imperial Rome, in the height of power, was scarcely her equal — was unheard in the legislative councils of the nation. Others reaped where they had sown and enjoyed as well the fruits of their valor as of their toil. If at that period such was the politi- cal condition of the people of England, their social position was undoubtedly supe- rior to that of most of the continental popu- lation, who out of the municipal corpora- tions, were regarded as mere serfs of the soil, to be transferred with the estates on which they were born and to which they belonged. Jt was reserved for the new world to first recognize the riglUs of man, and to j)roc!nim to the old the fundamental truth that the people are the natural source of all power — of all honor and of all sovereignty. The success of our revoluliou, which was j sumptuously every day," liave generously long regarded by many eminent men at home and abroad, as a political experiment, has excited all the efforts in Europe for the last 70 years in favor of the rights of the peo- ple and the extension of liberal principles — a holy cause, which can no more be arrested by the hand of arbitrary power than the surges of the ocean could be controlled by the voice of Canute — a cause destined to spread until it covers the face of the civil- ized world, and the very name of king shall become as odious as it was in Italy from the exile of the Tarquins, until liberty ex- pired on the bloody plains of Thessaly There is novv a public opinion which per- vades all Europe and is felt and recognized every where. It is whispered in Constan- tinople and muttered in Madrid. It descends to the dungeons of the Inquisition. It is proclaimed from the seven' hills of the Eternal City and is omnipotent in Paris. It has spread over all Germany and has been heard like the sound of many waters in imperial Vienna. It has even penetrated the walls of the Kremlin and caused the Autocrat to tremble on his throne. It can be circumscribed by no geographical bounds; it can be restrained by no cordon of armed retainers. It is in the very atmosphere we breathe, and "leaps from crag to crag like the live thunder." No sovereign, however despotic, will undertake in the present age to say with the proud and arrogant Louis Xiy, «/ am the State," for he feels that there is within the State a stronger power than his own, before which, when moved into action, he will be compelled to yield as the sturdy oak is prostrated by the temjjest. The monarch is no longer the State, but the especial guardian of his people, for whom, they being incapable of self-control, he as- sumes by the grace of God, the carking cares and toils of government. But this is an ungrateful world; and I have never heard of the subjects of a monarchy having ex- pressed any high Appreciation of the self- sacrifice shown by those who, living in marble palaces and 'dining in gilded halls, •'wearing purple and fine linen and faring taken upon themselves all the affairs of State, except its burdens. To avoid the acknowledgment of the great and incontroveitible truth, that the sovereignty of a nation resides in the peo- ple, the British Constitution (if thejmere will of parliament may be called a constitu- tion) has adopted a ridiculous fallacy — a fallacy so obvious that it can neither de- ceive themselves nor others. The corner- stone of their political structure is the ax- iom that "the King can do no wrong:" and yet they have beheaded one monarch — ex- iled another, and, violating, according to their views, the sacred right of primogeni- ture, deprived hjs innocent son, whatever may have been the crimes of the father, of the succession to the throne, to which his claim, according to the plainest principles of the government, was clear and unques- tionable; and placed "the sceptre in an un- lineal hand, no son of his succeeding." Any one who has carefully read the his- tory of the British revolution of 1688-9, must have been struck with the embarrass- ments of the Whig party by the passive re- sistance of James the II. Had they not by the wiles of the Prince of Orange, operated so far upon the fears of that pusillanimous tyrant and cruel bigot, as to induce him to leave the kingdom by flight, who can un- dertake to say what the consequences might have been.' In all human probability, the flames of civil discord would once more' have been enkindled, and the whole realm have been drenched with fraternal blood; and all this the result of ignorance of the great political truth, (on' which, however, they had practiced,) that the governor holds his authority solely by the assent of the governed, and is directly responsible to them for its exercise. The monarch, properly regarded, was simply the chief magistrate of the nation, and like all other magistrates and public officers vi-as invested with special authority for the public wel- fare; and if they had repudiated in princi- ple, as they had in fact, his pretensions to rule by the "divine right of kings," the whole question would have been easy ol solution, and his throne without further trouble been declared forfeited, by the abuse of powfer. In truth, disguise it as the British pub- licists may, the crown was conferred on "William and Mary" hy election, and there is no avoiding that conclusion; for, if it were not so, a grosser usurpation is unre- corded in history. It is singular that the dogma of "the divine right" should have been so strenuously upheld by the hierar- chy of England, when a perusal of Scrip- ture so plainly teaches the salutary lesson that the first king granted by the Almighty to his chosen people w^as in akger, and as a punishment for their sins and disobe- dience. The only monarch who has fully recogniz- ed the people as the source of all sovereignty was Napoleon Bonaparte, who, in his cele- brated speech in the Champs de Mai, when he restored the eagles to the difTerent regi- ments of the French army, said, with as much truth as sublimity, "General, Consul, Emperor ! I hold all from the French peo- pie " This was uttered in the same spirit of enthusiasm and knowledge of human nature as in his address to the troops before the great battle of Egypt, when, stretching forth his hand, he exclaimed: "From the tops of those pyramids forty centuries con- template your actions." It was remarked w'ith great force by Robert Hall, an emi- nent dissenting divine, and one of the first intellects of his age, that "the battle of Waterloo had set back the dial of history ten degrees." And so. undoubtedly it did, as regards the progress of liberal principles in Europe. Looking, my friends, to the consequen- ces entailed by our revolution on the rights and happiness of mankind, how much cause have you and all of us for gratitude, under Providence, to those great men who set the ball in motion. The history of the world records no sjiectacle more full of moral sublimity and grandeur than the assembling of the Ameri- can Congress at Philadelphia, when they first promulgated to the winds of heaven the political axiom, "that all men are crea- ted equal : that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights : that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness :" and that all gov- ernments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed." These were new, startling but philosoph- ical truths, very remotely connected with the dreamy speculations of the imaginative politicians of the 17th century, who sought in what was called the "social compact" for the authority of governments, in which each individual man was considered, in his normal condition, as surrendering a portion of his natural rights, and those of his pos- lerity,to secure the great ends of civilized society. This view of the origin of gov- ernments and the rights of the governed belonged rather to the fancy of the poet than to the philosophy of the statesman; for no such condition of things can be found recorded in the pages of history. On the contrary, our Declaration of Independence boldly proclaimed the practical fact, that it was the living generation that had the right to establish an organic law for itself, but not to bind future generations, who in their turn would possess an equal right to form a government for themselves. For the first time in the annals of nations the highest intellect was arrayed against despotic power. From that period may be dated the true expositions of the principles of government, — the correlative duties of the rulers and the ruled, and the annuncia- tion of the fact that all exercise of legiti- mate authority should be for the "greatest good of the greatest numbers," and beside this, all else was usurpation and abuse. There is a peculiar propriety that we should assemble and meet together on an occasion like the present, to return thanks to Almighty God, who has blessed us be- yond measure as a people, and to manifest our sense of gratitude to the signers of the Declaration of American Independence, who were truly the benefactors of the hu- man race. They were indeed men "out of xhe common roll." They brought with them for the performance of their great and holy task, high intellect," moral courage, philosophy, purity of motive and the most exalted patriotism; in fact, all the qualities that diiijnify and adorn human nature. A more august body never assembled on this earth, nor one charged \vith a higher mis- sion; for they may be said to have held in their hands the temporal destiny of millions yet unborn. When the barbarian Gauls, under their leader Brennus, penetrated to the Forum, and saw the venerable Roman Senators in their robes of office, quietly seated in their curule chairs and calmly awaiting their approaching fate, struck with admiration and astonishment, they ex- claimed: "These are gods I" And yet, the Roman Senate exhibited no greater firm- ness, no higher moral sublimity, than our Conscript Fathers, as each one placed his name to that solemn Declaration of Inde- pendence, which in case of failure would have proved the death warrant of the sign- er. When Charles Carroll affixed his name to that immortal instrument, some one observed that it would be difficult for the British Government to identify him, as there were so many of the same name. He immediately added "of Carrollton," a designation which he ever afterwards re- tained, and which has become a prouder title than any ])atent of nobility which roy- alty could confer. Another remarked: "There goes a million with the dash of a pen;" for he was emphaticallj', in more senses than one, a "man of a million." — They were indeed, my fi lends, men of stout hearts and ready hands; they cast every thing "on the liazard of a die;" the}' calm- ly prepared to enter into a contest, for life or death, with the most powerful nation of modern times; "on whose d