.^^ %/ «.♦' ^'^r .V ^ ^^i^"" %/ • • • r. •/ "^^^/^^V ^.'^-.o' \-^^V* i "^6 ^7^*. 0*5 'V*^^'./ 'o^'^^'ao'^ ^^^^-^V^V-^! ^^^c,^ ^^*v^ '^^v^^'/^ \/^^^*^^^ '^v^?^*/! - • « ' aO ''^ ^ ^"^ • • • . 'is. Air , « - «r*v ^ > . • • • . 'X «~ PRINCIPLES AND MEASURES OF TRUE DEMOCRACY. THE ADDKESS OF THE SOUTHEM AND WESTERN LIBERTY COr^VENTION, HELD AT CINCINNATI, JUNE II, 1845, \ TO THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES ; ALSO, THE LETTER OF ELIHU BUEUITT TO THE CONVENTION. ^ CINCINNATI ; PRINTED AT THE GAZETTE OFFICE. 1845. O NOTICE. The Soiithe7^n and Weslern Liberty Convention, held at Cincinnati, on the 11th and 12th June, 1845, was the most remarkable Anti-Slavery Body yet assembled in the United States. The call embraced all those who were resolved to act against Slavery by speech, by the pen, by the press, and by the ballot. It was not therefore exclusively a Convention of the Liberty party; and accordingly not a few were in attendance, who had not acted with that party. The whole number present as Delegates, was about two thousand — from the States of Ohio, Indiana, Illinois and Michigan; from the Territories of Wisconsin and Iowa; from Western Pennsylvania, and Western Virginia, and from Kentucky. Deputations were also present from Massachusetts, New York and Rhode Island; and the whole assembly, including spectators, varied during the sittings from two thousand five hundred to four thousand persons. James G. Birney, formerly of Alabama, but now of Michigan, presided, assisted by Messrs. S. C. Stevens, H. Mendenhall and S. S. Hardinge, of Indiana; Stephen E. Giffen, John Keep and Samuel Lewis, of Ohio; Edgar Needham and John G. Fee, of Kentucky; I. Codding, Owen Lovejof, James H. Dickey, of Illinois; A. L. Barber, of Wisconsin; Robert Hanna and Thomas Miller, of Pennsyl- vania, and David Craig, of Virginia, as Vice Presidents. The Secretaries of the Convention were Thomas Heaton, of Ohio, Russell Errett of Penn- sylvania, and M. R. Hull, of Indiana. The Committee which reported the Address, consisted of Messrs. Chase, of Ohio, Smith, of Pennslvan-ia, Cabell, of Indiana, Dickey, of Illinois, and Fee, of Kentucky. The proceedings of the Convention were marked by unanimity, vigor and decision. An Alabama paper, in anticipation of its assembling, spoke of the Convention as " the most important movement" of an Anti-Slavery character yet made, and declared that it "should look upon its proceedings as speaking more fully the real sentiments of A^orthern Anti-Slavery peo- ple" than any previous meeting of like character. The Address, which fol- lows, embodies the views of the Convention. It is commended to the can- did consideration of the people of the South, West, North and East. The movement of which it is a herald and a sign, cannot go back, but must go forward. It is the part of wisdom to know its nature, its progress, its ten- dency, and its end. The purpose of the Address is to reveal fully, ex- plicitly, without reserve, its whole character. It is desired, therefore, that each one into whose hands it may fall, will read it carefully; and, when read, hand it to a neighbor for perusal; and so let it go round! 0^ Orders for this pamphlet to any extent toill be supplied at ^\,bO per hundred, and in proportion for a smaller quantity. Address (post paid) Thomas K. Smith, Cincinnati, Ohio. -^ US reflect what would have been the condition of tlie country Iiad the original policy of the ■""^ nation been steadily pursued, and contrast what "^ would have been with what ia. ^ At the time of the adoption of the Constitu- i tion, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New Hampshire and Pennsylvania had become ~ non-slaveholding States, By the ordinance of 1787, provision had been made for the erection of five other non-slaveholding States. Tlie ad- mission of Vermont and the District of Maine, as separate States without slavery was also an- ticipated. There was no doubt that New-York and New Jersey would follow the example of Pennsylvania. Tlius it was supposed to be cer- tain that the Union would ultimately embrace at least fourteen free States, and that slavery would be excluded from all territory thereafter acquired by the nation, and from all States created out of such territory. This was the true understanding upon which the Constitution was adopted. It was neve imagined that new slave States were to be admitted; unless, perhaps, which seems jiroba- ble, it was contemplated to admit the West- ern Districts of Virginia and North Carolina, now known as Kentucky and Tennessee, as States, without any reference to the slavery already established in them. In no f.vcnt, to wiiicli our Fathers looked forward, could the number of slave States exceed eight, while it was almost certain that the number of free States would be at least fourteen. It was never supposed that slavery was to be a cherished in- terest of the country, or even a permanent in- stitution of any State. It was expected that all the States, stimulated by the examples be- fore them, and urged by their own avowed principles recorded in the Declaration, would, at no distant day, put an end to slavery with- in their respective limits. So strong was this expectation, that J.vmes Campbeij., in an ad- dress at Philadelphia, before the Society of the Cincinnati, in 1787, which was attended by the Constitution-Convention then in session, de clared, "the time is not far distant when our sister States, in imitation of our example, shall turn their vassals into freemen." And Jona- than Edwards predicted in 1791, that, "in fifty years from this time, it will be as disgraceful for a man to hold a negro slave, as to be guilt}' of common robbery or theft." It cannot be doubted that, had the original policy and original principles of the Govern- ment been adhered to, tbis expectation would have been realized. The example and influ- ence of tlie General Government would have been on the side of freedom. Slavery would have ceased in the District of Columbia immc- diatelv upon the establishment of the Govern- ment within its limits. Slavery would have disappeared from Louisiana and Florida upon the acquisition of those territories by the Uni ted States. No laws would have been enacted, no treaties made, no measures taken for the exte-nsion or maintenance of slavery. Amid the rejoicings of all the free, and the congrat- ulations of all friends of freedom, the last fet- ter would, ere now, have been stricken from the last slave, and the Principles and Institu "that when our ownjiberties were at stake, we warmly felt for the common rights of men: the danger being thought|to be passed which Ihreat- ened ourselves, we are daily growing more and more insensible to those riglits." 'I'his insen- sibility continued to increase, and prepared the way for the encroachments of the political are power, which originated in the tliree- fifths rule of the Constitution. This rule, de- signed perhaps as a censure upon slavery by denying to the slave States the full represent- ation to which their population would entitle them, has had a very diii'ercnt practical effect. It has virtually cslublished in the country an aristocracy of slaveholders. It has conferred on masters the right of representation for three- fifths of their slaves. The representation from the slave States in Congress, has always been from one-fifth to one-fourth greater than it would have been, were freemen only repre- sented. Under the first ajjijortionmcnt according to this rate, a district in a free State containing thirty thousand free inhabitants would have one representative. A district in a slave Slate, containing three thousand free persons and forty-five thousand slaves, would also liave one. In the first district a representative could be elected only by the majority of five thousand votes: in the other he would need only the majority of five hundred. Of course, the rep- resentation from slave States, elected by a much smaller constituency, and bound togeth- er by a common tic, would generally act in concert and always with special regard to the interests of masters whose representatives in fact they were. Every Aristocracy in the world has sustained itself by encroaciimeiit, and the Aristocracy of slave-holders in this country has not been an exception to the general truth. 7'lie nation has always been divided into par- ties, and the slave-holders, by making the pro- tection and advancement of their peculiar in- terests the price of their political support, have generally succeeded in controlling all. This influence has greatly increased the insensibil- ity to human rights, of which Martin indig- nantly complained. It has upheld slavery in the District of Columbia and in the Territories in spite of the Constitution : it has added to the Union five slave States created out of na- tional Territories : it has usurped the control of our foreign negotiation, and domestic legis- lation : it has dictated the choice of the high officers of our Government at home, and of our national representatives abroad : it has filled every department of executive and judicial administration with its friends and satellites: it has detained in .slavery multitudes who are constitutionally entitled to their freedom : it has waged unrelenting war with the most sa- cred rights of the free, stifling the freedom of speech and of debate, setting at nought the right of petition, and denying in the slave States those immunities to the citizens of the free, which the Constitution guarantees: and, finally, it Jias dictated the acquisition of an im- mense foreign territor}', not for the Icudablo purpose of extending the blessings of freedom, but with the bad design of difiusing the curse of slavery, and thereby consolidating and per- tions of Liberty would have pervaded the en- actuating its own ascendancy. tire land Against this influence, against these infrac- How diflTerent — how sadly diflferont are tlie|tions of the Constitution, against these dcpar- facts of History! Luther Martjn complained Itures from the National policy originally adopt- at the time of the adoption of the Constitution, 'ed, against these violations of the National faith originally pledged, we solemnly protest. Nor do wc propose only to protest. We recog- nize the obligations which rest upon us as de- scendants of the Men of the Revolution, as in- Jieritors of the Institutions which they estab- lished, as partakers of the blessings which they so dearly purchased, to carry forward and per- fect their Work. We mean to do it, wisely and prudently, but with energy and decision. We have the example of our Fathers on our side. Wo have the Constitution of their adoption on our side. It is our duty and our purpose to rescue the Government from the control of the slaveliolders; to haruionizc its practical admin- istration with the provisions of the Constitu- tion, and to secure to all, without exception and without partiality, the rights which the Constitution guaranties. We believe that slaveholding in the United States is the source of numberless evils, moral, social and political; that it hinders social progress; that it embit- ters public and private intercourse; that it de- grades us as individuals, as States, and as a Na- tion; that it holds back our country from a splendid career of greatness and glory. We are, therefore, resolutely, inflexibly, at all times, and under all circumstances, hostile to its lon- ger continuance in our hmd. Wo believe that its removal can bo effected peacefully, consti- tutionally, without real injury to any, with the greatest benefit to all. We propose to eff'cet this by repealing all legislation, and discontinuing all action in favor of slaverj', at homo and abroad; by prohibiting the practice of slaveholding in all places of exclusive national jurisdiction, in the District of Columbia, in American ves- sels upon the seas, in forts, arsenals, navy yards; by forbidding the employment of slaves upon any public work; by adopting resolu- tions in Congress declaring that slaveholding in all States created out of national territories is unconstitutional, and recommending to the others the immediate adoption of measures fo its extinction within their respective limits; and by electing and appointing to public sta tion such men, and only such men as openly avow our principles, and will honestly carry out our measures. The constitutionality of this line of action can- not be successfully impeached. That it will ter minate,if steadily pursued, in the utter overthrow of slavery at no very distant day,nonc will doubt. We adopt it because we desire, through and by the Constitution, to attain the great ends which the Constitution itself proposes, the establish- ment of justice, and the security of liberty. — We insist not, here upon the opinions^of some, that no slaveholding in any State of the Union is compatible willi a true and just construction of the Constitution; nor upon the opinions of others, that the Declaration of Independence set- ting forth the creed of the nation, that all men are created equal and endowed by their Creator with an inalienable right of liberty, must be regarded as the Common I^aw of America, an- tecedent to and unimpaired by the Constitu- tion; nor need wc ai)i)cal to the doctrine that slaveholding is contrary to the Supreme Law of the Supreme Ruler, preceding and controlling all human law, and binding upon alllegislaturei? in the enactment of laws, and upon all courts in the administration of justice. Wcarc will- ing to take our stand upon propositions gencr- natural right and justice; that it can subsist nowhere without the sanction and aid of posi- tive legislation; that the Constitution expressly prohibits Congress from depriving any person of liberty without due process of law. From these propositions we deduce, by logical inference, the doctrines upon which we insist. We depre- cate all discord among the States; but do not dread discord so much as we do the subjugation of the States and the people to the yoke of the Slaveholding Oligarchy. We deprecate the dissolution of the Union, as a dreadful political calamity; but if any of the States shall prefer dissolution to submission to the Constitutional action of the people on the subject of slavery, we cannot purchase their alliance by the sacri- fice of inestimable rights and the abandonment of sacred duties. Such, fellow citizens, are our views, princi- ples, and objects. We inviteyour co-operation in the great work of delivering our beloved country from the evils of slavery. No question half so important as that of slavery, engages the attention of the American people. All oth- ers, in fact, dwindle into insignificance in com- parison with it. The question of slavery is, and until it shall be settled, must be, the paramount moral and political question of the day. We, at least, so regard it; and, so regarding it, must subordinate every other question to it. It follows as a necessary consequence, that we cannot yield our political support to any party which does not take our ground upon this question. What then is the position of the political par- ties of the country in relation to thissubject? — One of these parties professes to be guided by the most liberal principles. "Equal and e.vact justice to all men;" "equal rights for all men;" "inflexible opposition to oppression," are its favorite mottos. It claims to be the true friend of popular government, and assumes the name of democratic. Among its members are doubtless many who cherish its professions as sacred principles, and believe that the great cause of Freedom and Progress is to be served by promoting its ascendancy. But when we compare the maxims of the so-called democra- tic party with its acts, its hypocrisy is plainly revealed. Among its leading members we find the principal slaveholders, the Chiefs of the Oligarchy. It has never scrupled to sacrifice the rights of the free States or of the people to the demands of the Slave Power. Like Sir Pertinax McSycophant, its northern leaders be- lieve that the great secret of advancement lies in "bowing well." No servility seems too gross, no self-degradation too great, to bo submitted to. They think themselves well rewarded, if the unity of the Party can be preserved, and the spoils of victory secured. If, in the distri- bution of these spoils, they receive only the jackall's share, they content themselves with the reflection that little is better than nothing. They declaim loudly against all monopolies, all special privileges, all encroachments on person- al rights, all distinctions founded upon birth, and compensate themselves for these efforts of virtue by practising the vilest oppression upon all their countrymen in whose complexions the slightest trace of African derivation can be de- tected. Profoundly do we revere the maxims of True Democracy; they are identical with those of ftlly conceded:— that slaveholding iscontrary to True Christianity, in relation to the rights and duties of men as citizens. And our reverence! vantage, without sacriHcing consistency, self- for Democratic Principles is tlie precise mcas- respect, and mutual confidence. While we say ure ofour detestation of the policy of those wlioi this, wc are bound to add that were eitlier of are permitted to shape the action of the Demo cratic Party. Political concert with that par- ty under its present leadership, is, therefore, plainly impossible. Nordowc entertain the hope, which many, no doubt, honestly cherish, that the professed principles of the party will at length bring it right upon the question of sla- very. Its professed principles have been the same for.near half a century, and yet the sub- jection of the party to the slave power is, at -this moment, as complete as ever. There is no prospect of any change for the better, until those democrats whose hearts are really posses- sed by a generous love of liberty for all, and by an honest hatred of oppression, shall manfully assert their individual independence, and refuse their support to the panders of slavery. There is another party which boasts that it is conservative in its character. Its watch- words are "a tariff," "a banking system," "the Union as it is." Among its members, also, are many sincere opponents ofslavery ; and the party itself, seeking aid in the attainment of power, and anxious to carry its favorite measures and bound together by no such professed principles as secure the unity of the Democratic Party, often concedes much to their anti-slavery views. It is not unwilling, in those States and parts of States where anti-slavery sentiment prevails, to assume an anti-slavery attitude and claim to be an anti-slavery party. Like the Democratic party, however, the Whig party maintains alliances with the slaveholders. It proposes, in its national conventions, no action against sla- very. It has no anti-slavery article in its na- tional creed. Among its leaders and cham- pions in Congress and out of Congress, none are so honored and trusted as slaveholders in practice and in principle. Whatever the Whig party, therefore, concedes to anti-slavery must be reluctantly conceded. Its natural position is conservative. Its natural line of action is to maintain things as they are. Its natural bond of union is regard for interests rather than for rights. There are, doubtless, zealous opponents of slavery, who are also zealous Whigs; but they have not the general confi dence of their party; they are under the ban of the slaveholders; and in any practical anti slavery movement, as, for example, the repeal of the laws which sanction slaveholding in the District of Columbia, would meet the deter- mined opposition of a large and most influen tial section of the party, not because the people of the free States would be opposed to the mea- sure, but because it would be displeasing to the oligarchy and fatal to party unity. We are constrained to think, therefore, that all expec- tation of efficient anti-slavery action from the Whig party as now organized, will prove delu sive. Nor do we perceive any probability of a change in its organization, separating its anti slavery from its pro-slavery constituents, and leaving the former in possession of the name and influence of the party. With the Whig party, therefore, as at present organized, it is as impossible for us whose mottos are "Equal Rights and Fair Wages for all" and "the Union as it should be," to act in alliance and concert, as it is for us so to act with the so called Demo- cratic party. We cannot choose between these parties for the sake of any local or partial ad- B these parties to disappoint our expectations, and adopt into its national creed as its leading articles, the principles which wc regard as fun- damental, and enter upon a course of unfeigned and earnest action against the system of sla- very, we should not hesitate, regarding as we do, the question of slavery as the paramount question of our day and nation, to give to it our cordial' and vigorous support, until slavery should be no more. With what party, then, shall wc act? Or shall we act with none? Act, in some way, we must: for the possession of the right of suf- frage, the right of electing our own law makers and rulers, imposes upon us the corresponding duty of voting for men who will carry out the views which we deem of paramount impor- tance and obligation. Act together we must; lor upon the questions which we regard as tho most vital we are fully agreed We must act then; act together; and act against slavery and oppression. Acting thus, we necessarily act as a party; for what is a party, but a body of citi- zens, acting together politically, in good faith, upon common principles, for a common object? And if there be a party already in existence, animated by the same motives and aiming at the same results as ourselves, we must act with and in that party. That there is such a party, is well known. — It is the Liberty Party of the United States. Its principles, measures and objects we cordial- ly approve. It founds itself upon the great cardinal principle of true Democracy and of true Christianitjs the brotherhood of the Hu- man Family. It avows its purpose to wage implacable war against slaveholding as the di- rest form of oppression, and then against every other species of tyranny and inj ustice. Its views on the subject of slavery in this country are, in the main, the same as those which we have set forth in this address. Its members agree to re- gard the extinction of slavery as the most important end which can, at this time, be pro- posed to political action; and they agree to dif- fer as to other questions of minor importance, such as those of trade and currenc)'', believing that these can be satisfactorily disposed of, when the question of slavery shall be settled, and that, until then, they cannot be satisfac- toril}' disposed of at all. The rise of such a party as this was anticipated long before its actual organization, by the sin- gle-hearted and patriotic Charles Follen, a Ger- man by birth, but a true American by adop- tion and in spirit. "If there ever is to be in this country," he said in 1836, "a party that shall take its name and character, not from particular liberal measures or popular men, but from its uncompromising and consistent adhe- rence to Freedom — a truly liberal and thorough- ly republican party, it must direct its first de- cided effort against the grossest form, the most complete manifestation of oppression; and, ha- ving taken anti-slavery ground, it must carry out the principle of Liberty in all its conse- quences. It must support every measure con- ducive to the greatest possible individual and social, moral, intellectual, religious and politi- cal freedom, whether that measure be brought forward by inconsistent slaveholders or consist- ent freemen. It must embrace the whola 10 sphere of human action; watching and oppo- sing tlie sliglitest illiberal and anti-republican tendency, and concentrating its whole force and influence against slavery itself, in compar- ison with which every other species of tyranny is to]erable,and by which every other is strength- ened and justified,'' Thus wrote Charles Follen in 1836. It is impossible to express better the want which en- lightened lovers of liberty felt of a real Demo- cratic party in tiie country — Democratic not iri name only, but in deed and in truth. In this want, thus felt, the Liberty Party had its origin, and so long as this want remains other- wise unsatisfied, the Liberty party muit exist; not as a mere Abolition party, but as a truly Democratic party, which aims at the extinc- tion of slavery, because slaveholding is incon- sistent with Democratic principles; aims at it, not as an ultimate end, but as the most im- portant present object; as a great and necessa- ry step in the work of reform; as an illustrious era in the advancement of society, to be wrought out by its action and instrumentality. The Liberty party of lb45 is, in truth, the Lib- erty party of 1776 revived. It is more: It is the party of Advancement and Freedom, which has, in every age, and witli varying success, fougiit the battles of Human Liberty, against the party of False Conservatism and Slavery. And now, fellow-citizens, permit us to ask, whether you will not give to tliis party the aid of your votes, and of your counsels? Ita aims are lofty, and noble, and pacific; its means are simple and unobjectionable. Why should it not have 3'our co-operation? Are you already anti-slavery men? Let us ask, is it not far better to act "with those with whom you agree on the fundamental point of slavery, and swell the vote and augment the moral force of anti-slavery, rather than to act with those with whom you agree only on minor points; and thus, for the time, swell a vote and augment an influence which must be counted against the Liberty movement, in the vain hope that those with whom you thus act now, will, at some indefinite future period, act with you for the overthrow of slavery? Tliere are, per- haps, nearly equal numbers of you in each of the pro-slavery partics,hone.stly opposed to each J Are you men of the Free States? And have' you not suffered enougii of wrong, of insult, and of contumely from Ihe slaveholding Oli- garch}'? Have j'ou not been taxed enough for the support of slavery? Is it not enough that all the powers of tjie government are exerted for its maintenance, and that all the Departments of the Government are in the hands of the Slave Power? How long will you consent by your votes to maintain slavery at the scat of the National Government, in violation of the Constitution of your country, and thus, give your direct sanction to the whole dreadful sys- tem? How long will you consent to be repre- sented in the National Councils by men who will not dare to assert their own rights or yours in tlie presence of an arrogant aristocracy: and, in your State Legislatures, by men whose ut- most height of courage and manly daring, \\ hen your citizens are imprisoned, without allegation of crime, in slave States, and your agents, sent for their relief, are driven out; as you would scourge from your premises an intrusive cur, is to PROTEST and submit. Rouse up. Men of the Free States, for shame, if not for duty! Awake to a sense of your degraded position. Behold yotir president, a slaveholder; his cabinet com- posed of slaveholders or their abject instru- ments; the two houses of Congress submissive and servile; your representatives with for- eign nations most of them, slaveholders ;• your supreme administrators of justice, most of them slaveholders; your officers of the army and navy most of them slaveholders. — Observe the results. What numerous appoint- ments of pro-slavery citizens of slave, States to national employments! What careful exclu- sion of every man who holds the faith of JciFcr- ."on and Wasiiiygton in respect to slavery, and believes with Madison "that it is wrong to admit in the Constitution the idea of property in man," from national offices of honor and trust! What assiduity in negotiations for the reclamation of slaves, cast, in the Providence of God, on foreign shores, and for the extension of the markets of cotton and rice and tobacco, aye, and of men! What zeal on the judicial bench in wresting the Constitution and the law to the purposes of slaveholders, by shielding kidnappers from merited punishment, and para- other on questions of trade, currency, and ex-jlyzing State legislation for the security of per tension of territory, but of one mind on thejsonal liberty! What readiness in legislation great question of slavery; and yet, you suffer 1 to serve the interests of the Oligarchy by un yourselves to be played off" against each other by parties which agree in nothing except hos- tility to the great measure of positive action against slavery, which seems to you and is of paramount importance? What can you gain by this course? What may you not gain by laying your minor difFerences on the altar of duty, and uniting as one man, in one party, against slavery? Then every vote would tell for freedom, and would encourage the friends of Liberty to fresh efforts. Now every vote, whether you intend it so or not, tells for .slave- ry, and operates as a discouragement and hin- drance to those who are contending for Equal Rights. Let us entreat you not to persevere in your suicidal,fratricidal course; but to renounce at once all pro slavery alliances, and join the friends of J,iberty. It' is not the question now whether a Liberty party shall be organized: it IS organized and in the field. The real question. constitutional provisions for the recovery of fu- gitive slaves and by laying heavy duties on slave-labor products, thereby compelling non- slaveholding laborers to support slaveholders in idleness and luxury! When shall these things have an end? ' How long shall servile endur- ance be protracted? It is for you, fellow-citi- zens, to determine. The shameful partiality to slaveholders and slavery which has so long- prevailed and now prevails m the administra- tion of the government will cease when you determine that it shall cease, and act accord- ingly. Arc you non-slaveholders of the slave States?" Let us ask you to consider what interest you have in the system of slaver}'. What benefits does it confer on you? What blessings does it jiromisc to your children? Vou constitute the vast majority of the population of the slave States. The ag. • • • ^ ''* LIBRARY OF CONGRESS IIP II" IM"1IM1IIMI'II 011 899 742 6