DELICATE FEASTING DELICATE FEASTING BY THEODORE CHILD AUTHOR OF "SUMMER HOLIDAYS" ETC. NEW YORK HARPER & BROTHERS, FRANKLIN SQUARE 1890 LIBRARY JL'L14 1890 ^•^?:' / uree, or crhne, is given to thick soups made of alimentary substances crusted or pounded, such as game, pease, beans, len- tils, asparagus, etc. The soups are gener- ally very nourishing, but not easily digest- ible. Consoinme\?> the name given to the supreme result of the decoction of animal and vegeta- ble matter ; it is a perfect bouilloft, a bouillon consomme. In the cook-books you will find directions for making the ordinary coyisommey composed of the juices of beef, veal, and fowls decocted in grand bouillon^ or fine stocky and also for making consomme de volaillcy consomme de gibier, and consommes of vegeta- bles. Consomjne is necessary for making fine soups, but for household cookery the good ordinary stock is sufficient. (N.B. — Without good beef-stock it is impossible to make a dinner worthy of the name.) Stock is con- stantly required in the most simple opera- tions of cookery. The aversion of the An- glo-Saxon cook to making stock is one of the main sources of his inferiority. Extract of meat does 7iot take the place of stock. Extracts of^neat should be very sparingly used in a well- regulated kitchen^ and extracts of coffee never* THE THEORY OF SOUPS. 8/ As a rule, in cookery, avoid new inven- tions, scientific improvements, and every- thing that recommends itself in the name of Progress. Good cooking, like good paint- ing, is a question of genius and se7itiinent. Note that stock, or bouillon, is not an ali- ment; the ^o-z'd}X^<\ potages gras, which have a basis of bouillon, are not essentially ali- ments ; in general, the soups that are served at a scientific dinner are not aliments. As we have said above, soup is, theoretically, merely a preparation for the dinner ; it is a consolation to the hungry stomach, and at the same time an appetizer and a stimu- lant. The decoction of meat and vegetables which, under the names of consomme or bouil- lon, forms the basis, if not the whole sub- stance, of meat-soups, or potages gras, is sim- ply an aromatic and exciting liquid of agree- able flavor, very poor in organic alimentary matter, but very rich in mineral salts. In the long process of cooking needed to make bouillon the eminently nutritious prin- ciples of the meat have been annihilated, and deprived of all their qualities of organic nutriment. Botiillon contains, in the way of assimilable substances, only a small quan- 88 DELICATE FEASTING. tity of grease, some mineral salts, and a cer- tain quantity of gelatine. The researches of modern chemistry have shown that gelatine has little or no alimen- tary virtues, but that it is certainly "peptoge- nic," that is to say, it excites the stomach to activity. The stimulating power of bouillon is chiefly due to creatine^ which has almost the same chemical composition as caffeine, and passes through the system without being absorbed at all. Bouillon is also rich in salts of potash. The chemists tell us that osinazome consists, as far as we can find out, of creatine, inosic acid, and mineral salts, lactates, phosphates, chlo- rures of potassium, calcium, sodium, etc. Bouillon restores a man immediately after drinking it, like tea or coffee. It is thus es- sentially an appetizer and a stimulant, but not an aliment. In devising a meitu and in regulating one*s desires, the above-mentioned points should be borne in mind. By the addition of all kinds of alimentary products, and by the various combinations to which purees and cr ernes lend themselves, the soup may be made a meal in itself. But in our ''Art of DeHcate Feast- THE THEORY OF SOUPS. 89 ing" the theory of soups is that they should play the role of stimulants, of appetizers, of soothers of the impatient stomach. At a dinner of any ceremony two soups ought to be served, one of the liquid kind and the other of a creamy nature. In the meat-soups — the simple bouillon or the more quintessential consommes — the qualities which the gourmet demands are limpidity, succu- lence, and purity of aroma, unimpaired by violent or piquant seasoning. In the early stages of the feast the palate is offended by too-ardent appeals. The qualities required in purees and cremes are smoothness and lightness, fineness of taste, perfect material, amalgamation of all the elements, and the preservation and development of the dis- tinctive savors of the different constituent substances. The Englishman proverbially says, " I don't like slops ;" by which he expresses a gen- eral disapproval of soups. If his experience has been limited to England I agree with him heartily. With the exception of the very heavy national soups of the turtle or ox-tail kind, the English soups are often, if not generally, nothing but '^ slops." Soups require care, method, and intelligence on the 90 DELICATE FEASTING. part of the cook who undertakes to make them, and also that quality which I have so frequently insisted upon as necessary for the highest achievements in the kitchen, namely, sentiment. IX. PRACTICAL SOUP-MAKING. The cookery-books contain multitudes of recipes for making soups. We need not re- peat them. In general, a cook who has the sentiment of his art will rarely follow pre- cisely any recipe given in a book ; he will content himself with seeking ideas in books and carry them out according to his skill and feeling. Practice, experience, and work un- der good masters make the best cook. In Paris the women cooks often take lessons in the kitchens of the great clubs. The life and soul of household cookery, the basis of a good, plain dinner, and of a host of stews, sdi.ucQSypureeSy etc., is beef bouillon. The first thing to learn to make is the poU au-feu. The result of the pot-au-feu must be savo- ry, clear, and free from grease. The .operations of skimming and straining through a sieve are most important. 92 DELICATE FEASTING. In winter, bouillon may be kept for three days. In summer it must be made fresh ev- ery morning. Directions for composing and manipulat- ing the pot-au-feu and various bouillons and consommes will be found in " The Unrivalled Cook-Book" (Harper & Brothers), and in Mrs. Henderson's " Practical Cooking " (Har- per & Brothers). In the same works will be found many hints for preparing soups, to which I beg to add the following simple soups, which are excellent if made with good materials and cooked with care. Velvet Soup, — Cook some tapioca in good stock or bouillon, being careful not to make the liquid too thick. When ready place the yolks of eggs in the soup-tureen, one yolk for two persons. Then pour over them the tapio- ca, stirring the whole so that it may become thoroughly mixed and uniformly creamy. A grain of nutmeg improves this soup. Velvet Soup maigre. — This soup can be made without meat. Cook the tapioca in water, with a little pepper and salt. Put into the tureen a lump of butter and the yolks of eggs — two for three persons. Then pour over them the boiling tapioca. Stir up and serve. PRACTICAL SOUP-MAKING. 93 I recommend to amateurs a shell-fish soup which I learned to make at Naples. The pres- ence of garlic in its composition need alarm only the squeamish. Garlic is a noble flavor. Shell-fish Soup. — Put into a stewpan some olive oil (half a tablespoonful for each person) and a little garlic finely chopped. When the garlic is well fried add some Tomato Sauce No. I (see Mrs. Henderson's " Practical Cook- ing," Harper & Brothers), half a tablespoon- ful for each person ; then put in your shell- fish — all sorts of small shell -fish, cockles, winkles, even mussels, etc., such as the mar- ket offers — well washed and brushed before- hand. Now add a spoonful of consomme for each person, a few cloves, and a little nut- meg. If your kitchen boasts no consomme you may use good bouillon^ strengthened with a little of Liebig's extract. When the soup has begun to tremble and throw up a few bubbles add a little more tomato ; let it boil awhile, and serve it clear with cubes of bread fried in oil. In order that the bread may still be crisp when eaten, the cubes, or croMonSy may be served apart, and some put into each plate just before the soup is ladled on them. Henri Fourth's Poule-au-Pot, — The homely 94 DELICATE FEASTING. dish which Henri IV. wished each one of his subjects to enjoy on Sunday is not a soup, but it is one of those household dishes the making of which gives an excellent soup. Indeed, \.h.Q poule-au-pot constitutes a meal of several courses. Make a pot-au-feu (see ^' Unrivalled Cook- Book," p. 35, Harper & Brothers); only in- stead of beef use a piece of brisket of mut- ton, with the usual vegetables and savory herbs. Take a young hen and stuff it with the liver and a little fresh pork. When the pot-au-feu boils put in the hen and cook it tender. Serve the bouillon as soup ; the hen with salt and tomato-sauce ; bread the bris- ket of mutton, broil it on the gridiron, and serve with piquante sauce. Mile. Franqoise' s Poule-au-Pot , — Take three pounds of beef, a big hen, two cabbages, pease, beans, dind pot-au-feu vegetables (see " Unrivalled Cook-Book," p. 35), a pound of raw ham, a Strasbourg or a Viennese saucis- son, half a pound of bacon. Put the beef in first, without the vegetables, start the decoc- tion, skim, and then put in the hen. When half-cooked take out the hen and put in all the vegetables, having previously put the fol- lowing /"^rr^, or stuffing, into the cabbages: PRACTICAL SOUP-MAKING. 9$ Bread-crumbs, six eggs, a quarter of a pound of bacon, six chickens' livers, or the equivalent in calf's liver, ham, parsley, onions, a grain of garlic ; chop all this up very fine, stuff it into the heart of the cabbages, and bind the leaves up with string before putting them into the pot. Now take a stewpan and put into it some bacon cut up into small pieces, and then the half-cooked hen, and then brown the whole with butter. Make a brown sauce with but- ter and flour (see " Unrivalled Cook-Book,' p. 395, " Roux "), enough to just cover the hen in the stewpan ; add a little uncooked rice, a dozen boiled onions, and let it stew until the rice bursts. Serve the poule-au-riz with the addition of a little nutmeg and cay- enne, or with the sweet Hungarian paprika^ if you have any. The soup and the beef of this poule-au- pot^ served together with all the vegetables, constitute the ''^Petite Mannite'' that has be- come so popular in Parisian restaurants of late years. In many restaurants little earth- en marmites, containing one or two portions, are served on the tables, and in each marmite is a small fragment of beef, pieces of all the vegetables, and a portion of the clear bouillon. 96 DELICATE FEASTING. Soup is really good only when it is eaten hot. Its warmth is an essential part of its excellence, and prepares the stomach for the important functions of the digestion of the succeeding and more substantial courses. The soup-plates should be hot, and the soup-tureen should be heated before the soup is poured into it. At a truly scientific table the spoons and ladles ought to be heated. Now, let us suppose a dinner of nine per- sons. If the host or hostess serves the soup, the last guest served will begin to use his spoon when the first served has finished, unless, out of politeness, all wait until the last is served, and then attack all together. If the soup is served from the side, and one or two servants pass the plates, the result will be the same. In both cases, during the time required to fill nine plates and pass them, there will be a loss of heat, and the beginning of the din- ner will be wanting in unison. The best way is to serve the soup in hot plates immediately before the dinner is announced. Then the guests enter the dining-room, take their seats, and begin to dine all at the same time and in perfect unison. X. ABOUT SAUCES. I. — Household Sauces. By sauces, let it be understood that we do not refer to the products sold in drug or grocery stores, and corked up in bottles, but to the sauces that are prepared simulta- neously with the dishes that they are in- tended to accompany and complete. We may divide sauces into two categories, household sauces and the classical sauces, the latter belonging to grand cookery. There are several household sauces, which a person of ordinary intelligence can learn to make. The first condition requisite is to have a kitchen supplied with stock, and with the usual seasonings and relishing herbs ; the second condition is care and practice in making the liaison^ or " thickening," with flour, butter, eggs, or cream, in their various combinations and developments. The household sauces are drawn butter, 7 98 DELICATE FEASTING. satice blanche, maitre d' hotel, beiirre noir, melted butter, sauce piqua7ite, sauce poi- vrade, sauce au vin blanc, sauce poulette, sauce Tartare, green and white ^nayonnaise, re- inoulade, Hollandaise, and others of a deriva- tive nature. Fine Hollandaise sauce and fine sauce blanche are both exceedingly simple in their composition, and both great tests of a cook's skill. Then why do we so rarely find them well made? This problem is as mysterious as the rarity of good dinners on this earth. The two chief causes of failure, or medioc- rity, which is just as bad, are the use of in- ferior materials and want of attention. Cook- ery, especially when we enter the domain of sauces, is a very delicate art, requiring the exercise of many qualities of delicate percep- tion. The cook who makes a perfect sauce blanche must take pleasure in his art, and perform every detail of the operation with extreme attention, vibrating over his sauce- pans as a painter vibrates over his picture, delicately sensitive to the changes of consist- ency which take place as the flour and butter become transmuted into a velvety liquid that has to the eye an aspect as of the surface of fine porcelain, close in texture, exquisite in ABOUT SAUCES. 99 glaze. In the cook-books you may read how to mix the materials of this sauce, but no books will teach you how to mix those materials in perfection. Once more, in all questions concerning sauces, we cannot insist too much upon the necessity of using fine materials, and, more especially, butter of the finest and freshest. Let all the pans be scrupulously clean, and always use wooden spoons for the manipula- tion and stirring of sauces. Metal spoons may spoil a sauce by giving it a chill. Metal, also, is liable to be attacked by the acids used in preparing sauces. In addition to the many sauces for the preparation of which directions are given in easily accessible cook-books, I would call at- tention to the following, which are appar- ently less known on American tables. Sauce Bearnaise. — A delicate piquant sauce to be served with roast fillet of beef, with the small, marinated steaks called by the French tournedos, with a simple grilled steak of small dimensions, with roast fowl or fish, is the sort of warm mayonnaise called by the French Bearnaise. In the first place, get some fine butter, and 100 DELICATE FEASTING. set it to melt over a gentle fire. When the butter is just tepid, beat into it, with a fork, yolks of eggs ; add aromatic herbs, finely- chopped, a dash of garlic, and a spoonful of good vinegar or lemon-juice, turning regu- larly with a wooden spoon until the mixture is of the consistency of a mayonnaise. Mile. Frangoise's Bearnaise Sauce. — Put in a stewpan a dozen shalots, a seasoning bouquet, a little muscade, and a teaspoonful of freshly ground pepper, the whole moist- ened with a glassful of vinegar. Boil down, and then strain through a sieve. Now take a small saucepan, and put in it a big lump of butter of the best quality, three yolks of very fresh eggs ; add two tablespoonfuls of the liquid already prepared as above, and put the whole over a very gentle fire ; turn it briskly with a wooden spoon, until the sauce gets thick, and take it off the fire very sharply, before it turns oily. Gouffe's Bearnaise. — Take five yolks of eggs, one ounce of butter, a pinch of salt, a pinch of pepper. Put the above in a pan, and turn it over the fire with a spoon. As soon as the yolks begin to set, take off the ABOUT SAUCES. lOI fire, and add another ounce of butter. Then stir again over the fire, and add another ounce of butter. Take off the fire, and add yet an- other ounce. Then stir again over the fire. Now taste to see if the seasoning is sufficient, and add a teaspoonful of chopped tarragon and a teaspoonful of tarragon vinegar. The finest and purest Bearnaise has a dom- inant perfume of tarragon. Of the above three recipes, the most correct is Gouffe's, but the others are good for convenience and variety. A green sauce for use with all kinds of cold fish and meat. — Take a handful of cher- vil, tarragon, chives, pimpernel, and garden cress ; wash in cold water ; blanch by put- ting the herbs in hot water for a while, to de- prive them of rankness or bitterness of taste ; refresh them by plunging them in cold wa- ter. Now add four yolks of hard-boiled eggs and two anchovies, and pound the whole well in a mortar. Strain the result through a fine wire sieve, and turn the compound with ol- ive oil, adding from time to time drops of lemon-juice, as in making a mayonnaise. Turn the sauce always in the same direction. Sea- son with pepper, salt, even a little mustard, and a teaspoonful of anisette. 102 DELICATE FEASTING. The above is a first-rate and delicate sauce, and requires none of the complicated bases employed by the grand cooks. Maitre d' Hotel.— T^^i^ butter of the size of an ^^g', chop parsley, chives, and even a sprig of tarragon, very finely; add freshly ground pepper and salt ; knead the whole well together, and spread it over the broiled meat or fish the moment before serving on a hot dish. N.B. — Never put your dish into an oven " to allow the butter to penetrate the meat," as some recommend. As soon as the meat is off the gridiron it wants to get to table with the least possible delay. In hot weather a few drops of lemon-juice may be added to the maitre d' hotel, and even a tinge of nutmeg. Chateaubriand a la Maitre d' Hotel. — As an instance of the use of maitre d' hotel sauce, here is the way to serve a Chdteaubriarid : The Chateaubriand is a beefsteak, a piece of fillet one and a half and even two inches thick, grilled and served with souffle pota- toes and maitre d' hotel sauce; that is to say, you put on the dish in which you intend ABOUT SAUCES. 103 to serve your Chdteaubriaiid a good lump of sweet butter kneaded with some very finely chopped parsley, salt, pepper, a speck of nut- meg, a suspicion of chives, and a drop or two of lemon-juice ; melt the whole by warming the dish, mix, and then set your Chateaubri- and in the middle of the dish, all hot from the gridiron ; heap round it the souffle pota- toes, using your fingers, and send up to table as quickly as possible. A really triumphant Chateaubriand is two inches thick after it is cooked, and it is cooked rose right through ; the outside is neither burned nor dry ; and when you cut it with the knife the red juice fliows out and mixes with the maitre d' hotels and makes it, as it were, something living and animated. The inventor and baptizer of the Chateau- briand, I have been told, was Magny, and the name was given to it by mistake, for, accord- ing to Magny, it was christened, not after Chateaubriand, the author of the " Genie du Christianisme," but after a M. de Chabrillan, who is not otherwise famous. II. — The Classical Sauces. The classical sauces are the innumerable derivatives of the primary sauces known as 104 DELICATE FEASTING. grande, Espag7iole, Allemande, velotcte, various essences, and various fumets, or flavors. All these primary sauces, or sauces meres y are sub- limated decoctions or quintessences of the most savory and succulent meats, whether of quadrupeds, fowl, or fish. In a modest household it is impossible to make them ; they require professional skill, expensive materials, and extensive apparatus. People who have princely establishments may pre- pare the finest sauces in their own kitch- ens, but the vast majority of mankind must depend upon the first-class restaurateurs for their preparation. The great authority Dubois - Bernard, speaking of this branch of his art, says : *' Sauces, by the care and labor they require, by the costly sacrifices which they necessa- rily involve, ought to be considered as the essential basis of good cookery. The gour- met would not think much of an elegant and sumptuously served dinner of which the sauces are wanting in that fineness of taste, that succulency, and that purity which are indispensable. " A man is never a great cook if he does not possess a perfect knowledge of sauces, and if he has not made a special study of the ABOUT SAUCES. 105 methodical principles on which their perfec- tion depends. *' Two causes contribute to the imperfec- tion of sauces — defective knowledge or de- fective materials. An incompetent man, dis- posing of the finest resources, only obtains a mediocre and doubtful result ; but a clever practitioner, if he has not the necessary ma- terials, or if those materials are insufficient or of bad quality, does not attain the desired end. Experience, practice, knowledge, be- come powerless in such circumstances ; the cleverest cook can correct and attenuate, but he cannot struggle against the impossible, nor make prodigies out of nothing. " Consequently, in order to make perfect sauces, the cook must not only know how to go to work, but he must know how to make the sacrifices that are required. These con- siderations, which we cannot too strongly im- press both upon amphitryons and upon cooks, have already struck more than one observer. True gourmets are not accustomed to make parsimonious calculations ; they know that good cooking is incompatible with insuffi- cient means." We must, therefore, conclude that the fin- est sauces are inaccessible to modest purses. I06 DELICATE FEASTING. because the cost of establishing the primary bases is too great to be undertaken in modest households. The same remark applies to the grands boiiillo7is of flesh, fish, and fowl. The production of these quintessences can only be successfully achieved by sacrificing large quantities of primary and often costly mate- rial. The fine sauces referred to are the out- come of the high French cookery, the so- called cuisine classique of the first quarter of this century, a cuisine which could only op- erate with a profusion of ingredients. The secret of this cuisine consisted in quintessenc- ing the taste, whether of meat, fish, or fowl, by means of similar comestibles sacrificed for purposes of decoction or distillation, and the perfumes and flavors obtained by this process were added as condiments to the piece of meat, fish, or fowl served on the table. Fish, flesh, or fowl, heightened by the addition of its savory quintessence, such is the theory of the grand, or, as we may call them, the clas- sical, sauces. The era of fine cookery began in the reign of Louis XIV., when Vatel lived, and left a name as famous as that of Boileau, and when the grand seigneurs immortalized themselves ABOUT SAUCES. lO/ by combining delicate dishes. Such was the Marquis de Bechamel, who has given his name to a fundamental sauce ; such the re- gent who invented pain a la d' Orleans ; such the Marshal de Richelieu, who invented maho7t7taises, or mayonnaises, and attached his name to a score of noble recipes ; such the smiling and imaginative Madame de Pompa- dour, who created the filets de volaille a la Belleviie, the palais de bcenf a la Pompadour, and the tendons d'agneau an soleil ; such were the grand ladies who invented quails a la Mirepoix, Chartreuses a la Mauconseil, poulets a la Villeroy. The name of Montmorency has received additional lustre from a dish of fat pullets. The dukes of La Valliere and Duras, the Prince de Gu^menee, the Marquis de Brancas, even the princes of the royal family, the Comte d'Artois and the Prince de Cond^, did their best to cherish the sacred fire of culinary art ; and whatever satirical writers may have found to say against the financiers and farmers general, none of them, whether hungry or gorged, dared to write a single word against the cooks and the tables of these heroes of incommensurable appetite. However, the idea of quintessential cook- ery, be it remembered, is due primarily to I08 DELICATE FEASTING. the cooks of the latter part of the eighteenth century who provided for the deHcately vo- luptuous stomachs of the grand seigneurs of the reign of Louis XV. dishes of a subli- mated chemistry, or, as a writer of the time says, dishes which consisted only of "quint- essences raisonnees, degagees de toute terre- strHter This ethereal cookery, these fine suppers whose menus suggest the repasts of the princes in the ''Arabian Nights," lasted even during the early years of the Revolution, when the cooks of the ruined nobles, nota- bly Meot, Robert, Roze, Very, Leda, Le- gacque, Beauvilliers, Naudet, Edon, became restaurateurs and sellers of good cheer to all who could pay the price. Beauvilliers, who established his restaurant about 1782, was for fifteen years the most famous restau- rateur of Paris, and provided literally such delicate and sublimated dishes as those which had hitherto been found only on the tables of the king, of the nobles, and of the farmers- general. The great restaurateurs of modern Paris are nearly all direct successors of one or other of the famous cooks above men- tioned. And it is only in such establish- ments, much as they have degenerated, or ABOUT SAUCES. IO9 at the tables of the Croesuses of the world, that one can hope to taste in almost satis- factory conditions the finest products of the cook's art. Duck a la Portugaise. — This recipe is due to the eminent poet, critic, historian, and journalist, Charles Monselet, who is the au- thor of divers succulent volumes on the gas- tronomic art, and of a famous sonnet on that encyclopaedic animal, the pig. The present dish is worthy of attention on account of the simplicity of the elements of which it is composed and of the short time needed to prepare it. Take either a wild duck or an ordinary duck ; if the latter, wring its neck smartly, so that there may be as lit- tle blood lost as possible ; dip it in hot wa- ter, so that you may feather it the more easily ; then draw and clean it. Take the heart, the liver, and the gizzard, and chop them up fine with three shalots ; pepper and salt liberally ; add a lump of fresh butter ; knead the whole well with a fork and stuff it into the carcase. Cut the duck's neck, reserving a piece of skin to sew up the aperture ; pack in the pope's nose, and sew up likewise; then roll the no DELICATE FEASTING. duck in a cloth and tie it round and round with a string; then plunge it into boiling salt water, and cook thirty-five minutes, or thirty minutes for a wild duck. Remove the cloth, and serve on a hot dish garnished with slices of lemon. Lamb or Mutton Cutlets breaded with Cheese. — Trim your cutlets neatly, remove superfluous fat, and make them dainty in shape. Dip each cutlet in melted butter, and then roll it in bread-crumbs and very finely grated Parmesan cheese, the crumbs and the cheese being in equal parts. Cook over a clear fire, and see that the cutlets do not get burned or blackened. " The gourmet is not a voracious eater ; he chews his food more than another because this function is a true pleasure to him, and because a long stay of the aliments in the palate is the first principle of happiness." — Grimod de la Reyniere. The real gourmet eats by candle-light be- cause, as Roqueplan said, ** nothing is more ugly than a sauce seen in sunlight." For this and other reasons the true gourmet ABOUT SAUCES. Ill avoids breakfast-parties, lunches, high-teas, pic-nics, and analogous solecisms. In these days of progress, science, gas- stoves, sophistication, and democracy, the gourmet's dream is to taste real meat cooked with real fire, and to drink wine made with real grapes. XL MENUS.— HORS HCEUVRES.— EN- TREES. However modest the dinner and how- ever few the guests, it is always desirable to have a menu giving the detail of the repast. Let there be at least one menu for every two guests, so that all may know what joy or dis- appointment is held in store for them, and so that each one may reserve or indulge his ap- petite as his tastes and his digestive interests may dictate. Nothing is more irritating at table than a surprise of a too material nature. For instance, it is unpleasant to find that you have devoted to a simple fillet of beef the at- tention which you would have preferred to reserve for quails, had you known that quails were in prospect. The presentation of the menu is a pretext for a variety of ta- ble bibelots, porte-menus of ornamental sil- ver or of porcelain, engraved cards, or cards decorated with etchings or water-colors. The HORS D'CEUVRES. II3 designing of menu cards decorated with etch- ings and water-colors has been made a spec- ialty by several Parisian artists of talent, like Henri Boulet, Mesples, Gray, and Henri Gue- rard. Never forget that a menu is not merely a total of dishes. In an eating-house there will be found a list of dishes which the An- glo-Saxon brutally calls the " bill of fare." In a restaurant like the Cafe Anglais there is a " carte " which forms a thick volume, and contains the enumeration of all the dishes that a cook can make ; there is also a " carte du jour," which is the menu of the restau- rant, the dinner of the day, with its noble order of potage^ hors d'ceuvres^ relevesy en- treeSj roasts, entreinetSy etc. The theory of a menu and of the composi- tion of a dinner is simplicity itself ; in gener- al terms, it begins with an excitant, namely, soup, satisfies hunger gradually by fish, sav- ory dishes, and roasts, with which latter a salad comes in to excite the digestion once more, and prepare the way for a vegetable, which will be followed by the dessert. In composing your menu you must consult first of all the market, and, secondly, the number of guests to be served ; and, in selecting the 8 114 DELICATE FEASTING. dishes, the chief things to avoid are such gross errors as the repetition of the same meats and the same sauces, or sauces of the same nature. If you serve a turbot sauce Hollandaise you must not serve after it a poulet sauce supreme^ or even a blanquette de veau. The use of French words in a menu is not indispensable. The dehcate eater is not bound to know French. Hors d'ceuvres are either cold, or, in pro- fessional language, hors d'ceuvres d' office, or warm, that is to say, hors d'ceuvres de cui- sine. Formerly warm hors d'ceuvres — al- ways without sauces — were served side by side with the entrees, only on smaller dishes. Nowadays many warm Jiors d'oeuvres are reckoned as entrees or light entremets^ and passed round rapidly, so that they may lose none of their delicacy by standing on the table. At dinner cold hors d'ceuvres offer but lit- tle interest to the gourmet, with the excep- tion of the canteloupe melon and the water- melon, but especially the canteloupe, when just ripe, and with the aroma fully developed. Cut the melon immediately before serving, HORS D'CEUVRES. I15 SO that none of the perfume may evaporate ; and let there be powdered sugar within the reach of those who wish it, and white pep- per for the more refined palates. The can- teloupe, in my opinion, should be eaten be- fore the soup, while the palate is absolutely fresh. As for rosy radishes, olives, anchovies, sar- dines, saucissoUy marinated tunny, herrings, or oysters, young artichokes a la poivrade, tongue, sprats, x:ucumbers, gherkins, pickled walnuts, etc., what place can such insignifi- cant trifles claim in the menu of a serious dinner? At midday breakfast it may be amusing and appetizing to nibble at these toy dishes, but, except at the family table, it is preferable to banish cold hors d'cetivres from the dinner menu. An exquisite cold hors d'oeuvre are fresh figs, served at the beginning of the repast. In Southern Europe you get this hors d'ceu- vre in perfection. Anywhere around the Bay of Naples a dish of figs, a slice of smoked ham, and a flask of red wine make a delicious morning meal. Warm hors d'cetivres, properly speaking, consist of small, dainty dishes, without sauces, such as little pasties, croustadeSy croquettes. Il6 DELICATE FEASTING. bouchces, cromesguis, timbales, orly, or fillets of fish, coquilles of fish or fowl, rissoles, souf- fies, and dehcacies served en caisses. The preparation of many warm hors d'ceuvres requires the resources of a first-rate kitchen and a professional cook ; for, although they are without sauce, nevertheless they require to be artistically presented. The warm hors d'ceuvres are served after the soup or after the fish ; they ought to be pretty to look at, and to furnish two or three delicate mouth- fuls. Several such hors d'oeuvres may be served on the same dish, which makes at once a handsome arrangement to the eye and offers greater choice to the guests, while at the same time it simplifies the service. For household cooking, however, the less said about warm hors d'ceuvres the better, for few private kitchens and few family cooks are equal to the task of preparing and serving these small dishes as they should be served. It is true you may get many of them from the neighboring pastry-cook's, but the gour- met distrusts dishes provided by pastry-cooks and caterers. Exception must, of course, be made for certain artists who have achieved fame for special things. In Paris, for in- stance, one of Bontoux's timbales is a dish ENTREES. 117 which it is a privilege to taste, and which no private or professional cook can surpass. But, as a rule, it is well to avoid getting dishes from outside, and therefore I advise the am- phitryon to dispense as much as possible with warm hors d'oeuvres. Let them be reserved for parade dinners, where there is necessarily more show than there is delicate eating. In the highest kind of cookery we distin- guish two kinds of warm entrees ; simple en- trees^ which owe their value to the rareness or fineness of the component elements whose original character must be carefully preserved, and in no manner disguised by the processes of dressing ; and entrees travaillees^ which are often less remarkable than the former, so far as concerns their component elements, but more elegant and decorative in aspect and more varied in composition. In the mount- ing of entrees the cook likes to show his taste in ornamentation, and often he goes beyond the mark, and awakens the distrust of the gourmet by the excess of his arabesques and combinations of line and color. The more refined the gourmet is, and the more closely acquainted he is with the secrets of the culinary art, the stronger his prefer- ence for simple dishes, and certainly for sim- Il8 DELICATE FEASTING. plc cfitrci's as compared with the entrees tra- vail lees. With the warm entrees the real artistic interest of a fine dinner begins, for it is with the entrees that the fine sauces are served. Here it is useless to disguise the simple truth ; household cookery cannot undertake the mak- ing of the finest sauces, and therefore none but the simplest entrees can figure on the menu of a private individual who has not a first-rate kitchen and a skilled professional cook. Entrees may be cooked to a turn, tastefully mounted, and served piping hot, but, unless the accompanying sauce is per- fection, these are only a delusion and a snare. Let amphitryons and cooks alike meditate the words of the wise. **The science of sauces," says Dubois, ** does not belong to everybody and any- body, for it can only be acquired in the grand school of practice. We cannot, there- fore, too strongly recommend cooks to study profoundly this part of the art. . . . Warm en- tries, by their very nature, are varied ; their number is infinite ; but the number of those which are suitable for a grand dinner is not so unlimited that they can be chosen at haz- ard. In a luxurious, rich, and elegant din- ENTRIES. 1 19 ner there ought to be served none but choice entrees, carefully prepared, ornamented, gar- nished, representing at once, in their ensem- ble, wealth, skill, and competent attention. But, in order to achieve this difficult result, the cook must operate in conditions where abundance and resources are unlimited^ XII. ON PARATRIPTICS AND THE MAKING OF TEA AND COFFEE. Tea, coffee, and tobacco come under the heading to which scientific men have given the name of Paratriptics. The demand for them is based upon their power to prevent waste in the body, so that by their help and stimulus men can do more work and endure more privation with a smaller amount of act- ual food. Tea, coffee, and tobacco are not food, although temporarily and continuously they supplement it. The physiologist Mole- schott calls them the " savings banks" of the tissues. As in the case of most articles of food, very little thought has been devoted to the preparation of tea and coffee for the table. In a great country like England it is impos- sible to obtain really well-made coffee except in a few private houses, while English tea is generally a rank and astringent decoction in- ON PARATRIPTICS. 121 stead of a delicate infusion. The traditions of the preparation of these beverages have become corrupted. When both tea and coffee were compara- tively newly introduced into Europe, the methods of preparing them were simple and logical. In his rare volume, " La Maison Reglee et I'Art de Diriger la Maison d'un Grand Seigneur et Autres, etc. Avec la veritable methode de faire toutes sortes d'essences d'eaux et de liqueurs fortes et rafraichissements a la mode d'ltalie " (Paris, 1692), the author, Audiger, who was the first limonidier-glacier that Paris boasted, records two recipes for making tea and coffee which he learned in Italy in 1659. " Take a pint of water and make it boil ; then put in it two pinches of tea, and imme- diately remove it from the fire, for the tea must not boil ; you let it rest and infuse time enough to say two or three paters {^^ Vespace de deux ou trots pater''), and then serve it with powdered sugar on a porcelain dish, so that each one may sugar to his taste." " Tea," adds Audiger, " comes from the kingdom of Siam, and is prepared as above ; its properties are to settle the fumes of the brain and to refresh and purify the blood. 122 DELICATE FEASTING. It is generally taken in the morning, to wake up the spirits and give appetite, and after meals to help digestion." Audiger prepares his coffee by first of all pounding the freshly roasted berries in a mor- tar or grinding them in a mill. Then he boils a pint of water in a coffee-pot, takes the pot off the fire when the water boils, puts in it two spoonfuls of coffee, stirs, and boils it up to foaming, withdrawing it from the fire each time the moment the foam rises. This operation of foaming he repeats gently ten or twelve times, and then precipitates the grounds, and clarifies the coffee by pouring into it a glass of cold water. " Coffee," remarks this excellent authority, *' is a grain that comes from Persia and the other countries of the Levant, where it is the natural and most common drink. When pre- pared as we have described, its qualities are that it refreshes the blood, dissipates the va- pors and fumes of wine, aids digestion, en- livens the spirits, and prevents sleepiness in those who have much business." These recipes are founded upon true prin- ciples. Chemical analysis shows that tea con- tains poisonous elements, whereas coffee is innocuous, and the whole of the berry good ON PARATRIPTICS. 1 23 to eat. In preparing tea we must beware of setting free the poisonous elements which the leaves contain, and that is the reason why a decoction of tea is deleterious. In coffee, on the other hand, where the whole is eatable, a decoction is admissible, and even desirable ; for instance, in coffee a la Turque, in which the liquid is not clarified, but served with the grounds and all. The proper and only truly hygienic man- ner of making tea is to infuse the leaves in boiling water, either by pouring the water over the leaves or by throwing the leaves into the boiling water. The time necessary for the infusion depends on the quality and quantity of the tea used and on the taste of the drinker. Some persons advocate pour- ing a small quantity of boiling water over the leaves at first, and a moment afterwards putting in the remaining amount desired. This method may be advantageous when a large quantity of tea is to be made ; but for two or three cups I do not believe that it en- hances the quality of the beverage. The points to be insisted upon are that the tea should be freshly made, and not left to " brew " for an indefinite period. The teapot must be hot when the boiling 124 DELICATE FEASTING. water is poured in, otherwise the temperature of the boiling water would experience a sud- den change, and the infusion would taste flat. Tea should be prepared daintily, in small quantities, and drank immediately. If it be needful to prepare tea in large quantities, the infusion should be decanted in a warmed earthen teapot as soon as it has acquired the appropriate strength. The object of decanting the infusion is to prevent the liquid from becoming impreg- nated with tannic acid and other acrid and noxious principles which the tea-leaves con- tain. Tea, as it is usually made in England and in America, where the process of infusion is allowed to continue indefinitely until the teapot is emptied, is a rank decoction of tea-leaves which can only be drank after it has been softened by the addition of milk or cream and sugar. The infusion of tea made as Audiger di- rects is a suave drink, soft to the palate, and tasting only of the delicate aroma of the tea- leaves. The time required for the infusion can only be determined by experience and individual taste. The equivalent in modern parlance of Audiger's '' two or three pater- ON PARATRIPTICS. 1 25 nosters " would be five to ten minutes. Re- member that the longer the tea is infused the more acrid it becomes, because the leaves give forth more and more tannic acid. For tea-making and for all delicate cooking operations the water should be caught at the first boil. Nickel or silver pots are unobjec- tionable, provided they be kept scrupulously clean ; but ordinary earthen or porcelain pots are preferable on all accounts. Tea made as above described will be drank with or without loaf-sugar sweetening, and needs no softening and spoiling with milk or cream. The custom of adding cream or milk to tea and coffee doubtless originated in ignorance or bad brewing. The coffee-drinking nations and the tea-drinkers of the East do not know this custom. The Russians put in their tea a slice of lemon. If the tea or coffee be good, the addition of milk spoils the taste. Furthermore, the tannic acid which is contained both in tea and in coffee changes the nature of the albu- minous part of milk, and, so to speak, tans the globules of the milk, and renders them in- digestible. Coffee and milk and tea and milk are difficult to digest. Pure cream is less ob- 126 DELICATE FEASTING. jectionable, because pure cream is really but- ter or grease, and contains very little of the albuminous part of milk. Tea and coffee both excite the nerves. Coffee acts more on the nerve-centre or brain ; tea excites the peripteral nerves. Coffee, therefore, produces brain excitement, while tea provokes rather muscular excitement. There are many ways of making coffee to suit the tastes of various nations. The Eng- lish like a mixture of chicory and coffee, and also brew a horrible black liquid with artifi- cial essence of coffee. In America some beat up an egg in the coffee to make it thick and rich. Various systems of filters and distillers have also been invented. But, after all, the simplest methods are the best. In order to make fine black coffee, you need first of all excellent berries, or a mixture of berries of different plantations. These berries ought to be freshly roasted and freshly ground, and put into the filter with all their aroma. The best filter is of earthenware, in two pieces, a pot with a spout surmounted by a perforated filter, in which the ground coffee is placed, and into which the boiling water is poured. Care should be taken not to have the coffee- berries too finely ground ; otherwise the filter ON PARATRIPTICS. 12^ will become obstructed, and the coffee get cold by the time it is ready to drink. In or- der to preserve all the aroma, it is better to grind the coffee and put it into the filter when the water has reached a boiling-point. Then begin by pouring the water into the filter slowly, and only a little quantity at a time. Do not make the fatal mistake of fill- ing up the filter and waiting until the water has passed through before you add any more ; in this case you will have not only cold cof- fee, but poor coffee. As soon as you have poured the first small quantity into the filter, replace the water over the fire, and always have it at boiling-point when you pour it into the filter ; thus, by gradually pouring a very small amount of boiling water at a time, it will pass through the ground coffee just quickly enough to extract all the strength and preserve all its heat. There are persons who first filter the coffee-grounds left over from the previous meal, and then pass this liquid, after bringing it to a boilings- point, over the freshly ground berries ; but this method is not to be recommended, as it pro- duces a strong, muddy mixture, without aro- ma. If you are a lover of very strong cof- fee, the best way to obtain it is to increase 128 DELICATE FEASTING. the amount of ground berries in the filter. For making moderately strong black coffee, a tablespoonful of ground coffee per cup is sufficient. The only other way of making coffee wor- thy of our notice is that employed by the Turks. Byron's friend Trelawney has de- scribed the process in his " Adventures of a Younger Son," where he says that good Mus- sulmans can alone make good coffee ; for, be- ing interdicted from the use of ardent spirits, their palate is more exquisite and their relish greater. " Thus it is," writes Trelawney. " A bright charcoal fire was burning in a small stove. Kamalia first took for four persons four handfuls of the small, pale Mo- cha berry, little bigger than barley. These had been carefully picked and cleaned. She put them into an iron vessel, where, with ad- mirable quickness and dexterity, they were roasted till their color was somewhat dark- ened and the moisture not exhaled. The over-roasted ones were picked out, and the remainder, while very hot, put into a large wooden mortar, where they were instantly pounded by another woman. This done, Kamalia passed the powder through a cam- el's-hair cloth, and then repassed it through ON PARATRIPTICS. 1 29 a finer cloth. Meanwhile a coffee-pot, con- taining exactly four cups of water, was boil- ing. This was taken off, one cup of water poured out, and three cups full of the pow- der, after she had ascertained its impalpabil- ity between her finger and thumb, were stirred in with a stick of cinnamon. When replaced on the fire,, on the point of over-boiling it was taken off, the heel of the pot struck against the hob, and again put on the fire ; this was repeated five or six times. I forgot to men- tion she added a very minute piece of mace, not enough to make its flavor distinguishable ; and that the coffee-pot must be of tin, and un- covered, or it cannot form a thick cream on the surface, which it ought to do. After it was taken for the last time from the fire the cup of water which had been poured from it was returned. It v/as then carried into the room, without being disturbed, and instantly pgured into the cups, where it retained its rich cream at the top. Thus made its fra- grance filled the room, and nothing could be more delicious to the palate. So far from its being a long and tedious process, as it may appear in narrating, old Kamalia allowed herself only two minutes for each person ; so that from the time of her leaving the 9 130 DELICATE FEASTING. room to her return no more than eight min- utes had elapsed." For making coffee in the Turkish fashion the berries require to be ground to a very fine powder. The Turks have small hand- mills for private use, but in the cafes the ber- ries are crushed in big iron mortars with long pestles, whose ringing sound is one of the characteristic noises of the streets of Stam- boul. Turkish mills and the dainty little tin pans containing one, two, three, or four cups are now easily obtainable in Western shops, and, with the aid of a spirit-lamp, Turkish coffee may be prepared on the table more expeditiously and with less trouble than black coffee made by the Western filter system. The refinements mentioned by Trelawney of stirring the coffee with a cinnamon-stick, and of adding a minute piece of mace, are not very commendable. The ideal in mak- ing tea and coffee, as in all delicate cookery, is to develop the taste peculiar to each article of food or drink. If the flavor of the coffee is fine in itself, it will not gain anything by the added suggestion of a spicy flavor. Black coffee needs to be served piping hot, and the cups and even the spoons should be heated before the coffee is poured out. Noth- ON PARATRIPTICS. 131 ing is more saddening after dinner than tepid coffee. For sweetening both tea and coffee loaf- sugar is to be used. There is no objection against powdered sugar, provided it be free from adulteration. For sweetening cold cof- fee, which is sometimes a grateful beverage in hot weather, syrup of gum is more con- venient than any form of sugar. Finally, whatever method you employ to make your tea or coffee, start with good ma- terials, manipulate them delicately and with care in every detail. XIII. THE DINING-ROOM AND ITS DECORATION In these days of " decorative art," it is necessary to say something about the aspect of a dining-room and its ornamentation. Doubtless the best ornament for a dining- room is a well-cooked dinner, but that dinner will taste all the better in a room that is ra- tionally furnished, agreeably decorated, and heated just to the right point. As regards the furnishing and decoration, much must be left to individual taste ; at the same time there is reason to protest against two influences which are equally irrational, the one French, and the other English, and both resulting in making a dining-room a sombre and severe place. There is no reason why the darker shades of green, brown, and red, should be reserved for dining-rooms ; I have eaten delightfully in a room where the panelling was painted pale lilac, picked out with blue and salmon red ; and against this THE DINING-ROOM. 1 33 background the ladies, with fresh flowers in their hair, stood out Hke a spring meadow against a vernal sky. It is not forbidden to make a dining-room gay in tone. The fur- niture is not necessarily of dark mahogany or oak. The Henri II. dining-room, now so fashionable, with its heavy curtains and por- tieres ^ its monumental fire-places, mantels, and andirons, and its walls decked out with arms, bibelots, tapestries, and what not, is the most unreasonable of all dining-rooms. All tapestry, portieres, hangings, bibelots, and other such things are objectionable, because they absorb the odors given forth by the drinks and viands. The display of armor on the walls is a silly affectation. There is no excuse whatever for converting a dining-room into a museum, and for this reason one does not wish to see the walls hung over with plates and dishes. The proper place for plates and dishes when not in use is in a cupboard, or on the shelves of a drawer. All archaic decoration is peculiarly out of place in a dining-room, where the principal object, the table, when laid out for breakfast or for dinner, is radically and absolutely modern. This room seems to me peculiarly worthy of the attention of our modern decorative art- 134 DELICATE FEASTING. ists, who might deliver us from the heavy and pompous splendor of the English, and of the silly feudalism and baronialism of the French Henri II. room, if they would only consent to neglect fashion, and apply their reasoning powers to the solution of the problem. A host may show his personality and his taste in the arrangement of his dining-room as Tnuch as in his dress, or in his conversa- tion, and yet nowhere do we see so little originality. People are singularly conserva- tive in all that concerns the art of entertain- ing. The finest dinners nowadays are terri^ bly monotonous ; over and over again the same menu is served in the same way and in the same conditions of milieu and decora- tion. The dining-room need not be a dark- toned, impersonal place of immutable aspect. That correct gentleman, Comte Mole, when he received one of his friends of the diplo- matic corps, would place in his salle a manger plants, flowers, and pictures which reminded his guest of his fatherland. Lord Lonsdale carried his refinement so far as to have a series of dining-rooms with hangings, furni- ture, and porcelain appropriate in tone to the color of the hair and the kind of beauty of THE DINING-ROOM. 1 35 the lady he was feting. \ On a less grandiose scale, I know an amiable hostess in London whose dining-room walls are covered with a rose-colored Louis XVL striped silk, and who has the two maids who serve at table dressed in colors and patterns that harmonize with the walls of the room. In a dining-room the aim of the decorator should be simplicity and gayety of aspect ; and the materials which he may best use are wainscoting, or lainbris, of the styles of Louis XIIL, XIV., XV., and XVL, or of modern de- sign, if he can find a designer, stucco, lacquered woodwork, panelling filled in with stamped leather, or decorative painting, neo-Greek decoration, simple panelling, either of natural wood or of wood painted in plain colors, or, finally, simple wall-paper, only let it be re- membered that the paper need not be of dark hue. Madame de Pompadour's dining-room at Bellevue was decorated with hunting and fishing scenes by Oudry, and the attributes of these sports were repeated on the wood- work carved by Verbreck. In a little novelette by Bastide, called '* La Petite Maison," we find a curious contempo- rary description of a dining-room in one of 136 DELICATE FEASTING. those elegant villas where the rich French- men of the eighteenth century indulged their tastes for refinement and luxury of all kinds. " The walls," we read, " are covered with stucco of various colors, executed by the celebrated Clerici. The compartments, or panels, con- tain bass-reliefs of stucco, modelled by the fam- ous Falconet, who has represented the fetes of Comus and of Bacchus. The trophies which adorn the pilasters of the decoration are by Vass6, and represent hunting, fishing, the pleasures of the table, those of love, etc. ; and from each of these trophies, twelve in number, springs a candelabrum, or torchere^ with six branches." I recommend architects and amateurs to read the great architect Blondel's two volumes on " La Distribution des Maisonsde Plaisance" (Paris, 1737), where they will see how great was the refinement of the French in the eighteenth century, and, above all, how delicate the tonalities of lilac, blue, rose, and bright grays which they pre- ferred to give to the walls of their dwellings. At the end of the eighteenth century the influence of the discovery of Pompeii and Herculaneum naturally made itself felt, and the dining-rooms of the Directory and of the First Empire were arranged in the antique THE DINING-ROOM. 1 37 fashion with stucco or marble, adorned with columns and pilasters, and friezes, either with bare walls or with walls decorated with stucco bass-reliefs, or Pompeian arabesques. The neo-Greek or Pompeian style still has its advocates. During the second empire. Prince Napoleon had a Pompeian palace built in the Avenue Montaigne, at Paris, from de- signs by M. Alfred Normand. In this palace, which is in reality only a very modest villa, the dining-room is lighted by a large window divided into three, by two pilasters ; the ceiling is panelled in caissons, and the walls are panelled in red, blue, and yellow, which colors serve as the ground for the most deli- cate ornamentation that the Pompeian style created — slender columns, trellises, long fila- ments of plants, light garlands, blond or ver- meil fruits, bows of ribbon, birds, cups, mu- sical instruments, chhneres^ intermingled dis- creetly with ears of corn, fish, and game, which reveal the intention of the room without sating the eyes before sating the stomach, as is often the result of our modern game and fruit pieces, fitter to serve as a sign for a butcher's shop than as a vision to be placed before the eyes of delicate gourmets. 138 DELICATE FEASTING. Some of the dining-rooms of the Directory- epoch which still remain, or of which we have drawings, must have been very pleasant to the eye. A typical house of that period was one designed by the architect and deco- rator Bellanger, for a celebrity of the epoch, Mademoiselle Dervieux. The basis of the decoration of her dining-room was gray, white, and yellow stucco ; the over-doors were bass-reliefs of white stucco on Wedgewood- blue ground, the doors of unpolished ma- hogany with medallions and panels in yellow wood, framed with silver fillets and painted with arabesques and subjects, the pilasters of Sienna yellow covered with silver ara- besques. Some elaborate specimens of this style of decoration may be seen in several of the Russian imperial palaces. I do not abso- lutely recommend the Directory style for imitation, but there are valuable hints to be obtained from the tender-colored and often tasteful arrangements of that period. In England, the painter Whistler has contrib- uted his mite of influence towards emanci- pating people from the traditional dinginess and sombre tones of dining-room furniture and decoration. The painter's own dining- room is canary yellow, with blue and white THE DINING-ROOM. 139 china as a decoration. A famous dining-room, designed and painted by Whistler, for Mr. Leyland's house, is pale blue and pale gold, covered with arabesques that suggest the motif of peacocks and their feathers. The only decoration of this room is composed of decorative peacock panels on the shutters of the windows, and on the walls a collection of blue-and-white Chinese porcelain arranged on gilt shelves. XIV. ON DINING-TABLES. How true is that maxim of Paulus ^mili- us, when he was to entertain the Roman peo- ple, after his glorious expedition into Greece : " There is equal skill required to bring an army into the field and to set forth a mag- nificent entertainment, for the object in the first case is to annoy your enemy as far as possible, and in the second to give pleasure to your friend." In the art of feasting, Vart des festins, as the gastronomic writers of the eighteenth century call it, the arrangement of the table is as important as the preparation of the food itself, for a good dinner badly served is a good dinner spoiled. The first object that requires our attention in the dining-room is the table. It is the table that ought to regulate everything, the table itself being regulated by the normal stat- ure of the people who are to use it. Whether round, rectangular, or rectangular with round ON DINING-TABLES. 14I ends, telescope table or table with inserted leaves, its size should be based on the fact that each person should be allowed 30 inches of space in width, and, in order to insure free circulation and perfect waiting, a space of six feet is demanded between the wall and the backs of the diners' chairs. The proportions to be observed in making the table are that the length may exceed the breadth by one quarter, one third, one half, and very excep- tionally by three quarters for a large company. Outside of these proportions the equilibrium is destroyed and the service loses its fine order and unity ; we then fall into those long tables which are a series of tables juxtaposed — the unsociable tables of public banquets and mo- nastic refectories. The above proportions and measures have been fixed by the experience of those who are most interested in a dinner, namely, those who eat it and those who serve it, and it is in accordance with them that the dining-room ought to be constructed, for the object of the dining-room is to contain the dining-table and its accessories, that is to say, chairs, dumb-waiters, side tables, and dressers strictly necessary for the service. These meas- ures, ample as they are, do not imply an im- mense room, for, be it remembered, from the 142 DELICATE FEASTING. remotest antiquity the number of guests that can be admitted to an artistic dinner-table ought not to exceed that of the Muses, nor to be fewer than that of the Graces. The din- ing-room — the shape of which should be sug- gested by the shape of the table — needs two doors, one communicating with a drawing- room, and one with a butler's pantry, or indi- rectly with the kitchen. Generally the modern dining -table errs on the side of too great solidity. The first quality of a table obviously is that it should be firm on its legs, but there is no reason for exaggerating its strength into clumsiness. Furthermore, the dining-table of richly carved oak, walnut, rosewood, or mahogany is a use- less luxury ; the ornamentation is misplaced and often fatal to knees ; the richness of the material itself is lost, inasmuch as the table is always covered with a cloth. A table, accord- ing to Dr. Johnson, is '' a horizontal surface raised above the ground and used for meals and other purposes." Roubo, in his treatise on joinery and cabinet-making, written in the latter part of the eighteenth century (1770), says that tables are all composed of a top and of one or more feet which are fixed or mov- able or folding. Of all the furniture ever ON DINING-TABLES. 1 43 made, the French furniture of the eighteenth century seems to me the most rational, the most convenient, and the most tasteful. Of all the cookery ever achieved, that of the time of the Regent was probably the most exquis- ite. A contemporary of the petite soiipers of the eighteenth century, Grimm, the author of the famous " Correspondance Litteraire," questions very much whether *'the sumptu- ousness of the Roman tables could enter into any comparison with the studied refinement of the French." We may therefore ask with curiosity what kinds of tables were used, and we shall find in Roubo's "Art du Menuisier Ebeniste" the following excellent theoretical remarks on the subject : " Eating-tables," says Roubo, " are not sus- ceptible of any decoration ; they consist sim- ply of several planks of pine or some other light wood joined together with tongue and groove, and bound with oak at the ends. These tables, or rather these table-tops, are almost all of one shape, that is to say, a par- allelogram larger or smaller according to the number of covers. Formerly eating-tables were made round or oval, but at present these forms are little used. The size of tables is determined, as I have just said, by the num- 144 DELICATE FEASTING. ber of guests, to each of whom ought to be attributed at least two feet of room, or, bet- ter still, three feet, especially when there are many ladies at a meal, because their dresses take up much more room than those of men." Roubo calculates his small, medium, and large tables on the basis of two feet for each cover, and his largest table for ten persons is six by five feet. When a larger number of guests had to be accommodated, recourse was had to leaves or flaps and to composite or juxtaposed tables. Grand feasts were always served on composite tables. Roubo thus sums up the practices of the eighteenth cen- tury in the matter of tables : " Large tables are those which can not only accommodate a large number of guests, but also the middle of which is large enough to hold a surtout de decoration^ either of flowers, sweetmeats, etc., which, with the number of covers given, determines precisely the size of these tables, on the principle that there should be two feet of room around the dorinant, or plateau which forms the basis of the decora- tive centre-piece. As these tables are ordina- rily very large, they are made up of a num- ber of tables joined together with tongue and groove and held by clamps placed at inter- ON DINING-TABLES. 145 vals. These tables are placed as solidly as possible on trestles in such a manner that the trestles may be about a foot inside from the edge of the table so as not to inconvenience those who are seated around. ^' Besides the large tables I have just men- tioned," continues Roubo, *' there are also hollow tables, commonly termed horse-shoe tables, either with the upper end round or forming simply an elbow. Both these tables are very convenient, inasmuch as the service can be performed from the inside without interfering with those who are seated round. Their only disadvantage is that they can only receive artificial surtouts of moderate size, which is in my opinion no great misfortune, for in point of fact the enormous surtouts with which the tables of the great are loaded serve only to render the waiting more diffi- cult and even inconvenient, and to obstruct the view of all the guests, who can, only with difficulty and manoeuvring, see the other side of the table." The breadth of Roubo's horse- shoe table is three feet, and the height of all his eating-tables twenty-seven to twenty-eight inches. A rare volume called *' Le Cannameliste Francais," pubhshed at Nancy in 1761 by 10 146 DELICATE FEASTING. Gilliers, who was head butler, or chef d' office, and distiller to King Stanislas, may be con- sulted with profit by those who are curious as to the service and aspect of eighteenth- century tables. It is a big volume, where, in the midst of charming copper-plate en- gravings representing desserts laid out in toy- gardens, with grass-plots of chenille, and walks of nonpareille to imitate gravel, you find recipes for pomegranate jam, syrup of jas- mine, candy of violets, roses, and jonquils — odorous and ethereal quintessences which remind one of the sweetmeats of a feast in the "Arabian Nights." Gilliers's book is a complete manual of the art of delicate feast- ing according to the received ideas of the time of Louis XV. About this matter of tables, Gilliers has the most delightfully fan- tastic notions. The classification of tables into round, square, oblong, and horse -shoe forms does not satisfy him ; he maintains that a table may have any form that we please to give to it, and in a cut which we here reproduce he shows us a table of most amus- ing and capricious contour, suggestive of the influence of contemporary rocaille forms. This table is built up by means of composite tops, keyed on treadles. In his book, Gilliers ON DINING-TABLES. 147 gives a dozen plans of tables of capri- cious arabesque and rocaille forms, ac- companied by mi- nute directions for drawing the figures and sawing them out of deal boards. To make such ta- bles is very easy and simple, and I have no doubt that if some lady would take the trouble to give a grand feast at a table such as the one figured in our cut, she would not regret her ele- gant initiative. It seems to me that in this matter of dining-tables we might with ad- vantage struggle against tradition and devote just a 148 DELICATE FEASTING. little reasoning to the question. Let us take, for instance, the large round tables used in many of the New York club-houses. These tables are monuments ; their diameter enor- mous; their centre quite beyond the reach of those who are seated around the periphery ; the ^^ horizontal surface raised above the ground" is greater than is needed, and much of it remains waste to be encumbered only by massive and useless ornaments, plate, or what not. And yet there are doubtless many who imagine that these round tables are similar in all essentials to those which the Arthurian legend and the romances of chiv- alry have rendered famous. This is prob- ably a mistake ; the round tables of chivalry were, I imagine, hollow or broken circles like the table shown in the accompanying cut taken from an illuminated manuscript of the fourteenth century. With the exception of the fixed seats or stalls, which seem difficult of access, this round table is perfectly con- venient ; it is no wider than is necessary ; it is covered with a fair and beautifully em- broidered cloth, and it is most convenient for the service, which is performed by the little pages whom we see in the centre, dis- creetly attentive to the wants of the quaint ON DINING-TABLES, 149 old magnates who are seen in the act of dining. With our modern round or square tables ROUND TABLE OF FOURTEENTH CENTURY. the service is always inconvenient. What can be more disagreeable than the ordinary modern system of service executed by wait- ers who approach the diner treacherously I50 DELICATE FEASTING. from behind, pass the dish over his left shoulder, and occasionally pour a few drops of gravy over his coat-sleeve ? Curiously enough, this question of serving feasts has not occupied the attention of many writers. Books on the duties of the maitre d' hotel are rare, and the matter has only been touched upon incidentally in the regular treatises on the culinary art, which were themselves rare until modern times ; for, as the gastronomic poet, Dr. William King, has remarked, " Tho' cooks are often men of pregnant wit, Thro' niceness of their subject few have writ." In the Middle Ages, which were far more refined in manner than most people believe, the general disposition of the dining-table was borrowed from the usage of the abbeys and convents, and it was precisely the dis- position still maintained in the English uni- versities at the present day. The principal table was laid on a raised platform or floor at the upper end of the dining-hall, and re- ceived the name of '' high table," a term still in use at Oxford and Cambridge. The guests sat on one side of the table only ; the place of honor was in the centre ; and the principal personage sat under a canopy or cloth of state, ON DINING-TABLES. 151 hung up for the occasion, or under a perma- nent panelled canopy curving outwards. At Florence, in the time of the Renais- sance, the guests appear to have sat on one side of the table and at the ends. Such is the arrangement in Pinturrichio's pictures of the Story of Griselidis now in the National Gallery at London. One of these pictures represents a feast served under a portico built in a garden. The guests are seated along one side and at the ends of a long and nar- row table. The waiters carry long napkins thrown over their shoulders or streaming in the wind like scarfs as they walk. In the collection of Mr. Leyland, at London, there is a beautiful picture by Sandro Botticelli representing a feast served in a lovely green meadow under a portico having five pillars on each side. In the background, at a short distance off, is a sort of triumphal arch, and beyond it you see a landscape and a lake with boats and islands crowned with castles. In the foreground is a dresser richly draped with precious stuffs and laden with massive gold plate and parade dishes and ewers. There are two tables, arranged parallel and in perspective, and the guests are seated on one side only, at one table the v/omen, and 152 DELICATE FEASTING. at the other the men, the former against a background of garlands of verdure and flow- ers stretched from pillar to pillar behind the bench on which they are seated. Remark this separation of the women from the men, and read an account of a bachelor's supper- party at Rome, given by Benvenuto Cellini, in his fascinating autobiography. *' When the banquet was served and ready, and we were going to sit down to table, Giulio asked leave to be allowed to place us. This being granted, he took the women by the hand, and arranged them all upon the inner side, with my fair in the centre ; then he placed all the men on the outside, and me in the middle. As a background to the women there was spread an espalier of natural jas- mines in full beauty, which set off their charms to such great advantage that words would fail to describe the effect." (J. A. Symonds's translation.) Both in Pinturrichio's and Botticelli's pict- ures, the costume, the manner of carrying the dishes, and the stately rhythmic walk of the waiters is particularly noticeable, and on this point I would refer the curious to Fran- cesco Colonna's " Hypnerotomachia," first published in 1499, where there is a most minute ON DINING-TABLES. I 53 account of a feast given in the palace of Queen Elentherilide. At this feast, where, with the exception of Poliphilo, only the queen and her maidens are present, the guests are seated on one side of the tables only, ex- actly as we see in Botticelli's picture above noted on benches placed along the walls. The manner of carrying the dishes and nap- kins is described exactly, and corresponds in all points with the attitudes and bearing of the waiters in the two pictures in question. The sumptuousness of this feast surpasses everything that has ever been seen or imag- ined. I have space only to note one or two details. Each guest was waited upon by three maidens dressed in magnificent gar- ments of the same color as the table-cloth ; with each course, the table-cloth and the flowers* were changed, and the attendant maidens' garments likewise ; the table-cloths were of silk or satin, and of sea-green, rose, amethyst, and other colors, successively. The art and the literature of the past would furnish many other proofs of the re- finement of our ancestors in their table-ser- vice, but perhaps the above-mentioned in- stances will suffice to suggest to some hosts the idea of rebelling against too rigid tradi- 154 DELICATE FEASTING. tlons. Our modern system of alternating men and women at table, side by side, is an ancient one also, but the plan noticed by Benvenuto Cellini might be tried occasion- ally, and it would be a very refined fancy to arrange a background especially to set off the beauty of a bevy of fair ladies arranged at table in a group, for their own pleasure, of course, but also for the delectation of the eyes of the men. As regards the guests being seated on one side of the table only, and being served from the , front and not from the back, I consider this reform, or rather this return to the practices of the past, to be very desirable. The necessity of having waiters at table is regrettable. Male waiters are often, if not generally, dreadful phenomena. There is nothing more shocking to the gourmet than the vision of the waiter's abominable thumb grasping the rim of a plate and threatening at every moment to come into contact with the soup or the meat that he is passing. Even when this thumb is veiled in a spotless white cotton glove, it still re- mains objectionable ; on this point, I agree with the painter W. P. Frith, who says in one chapter of his ''Reminiscences:" '' I think ON DINING-TABLES. 1 55 if I were ever so rich, I should as much as possible avoid men-servants ; not that I have a word to say against a highly respectable portion of the community, but being, like the Vicar of Wakefield, an admirer of happy faces, I am also an admirer of pretty ones, only they must be of. the female order." The delicate gourmets of the eighteenth century devoted much ingenuity to solving the problem of waiting at table, and several of them invented costly apparatus for raising and lowering the table through the floor al- ready served. Grimod de la Reyniere was the sworn enemy of servants, and the dream of his life was to discover some machine to replace those human machines which have always too many eyes and too many ears, and render all expansiveness impossible or imprudent. In 1728 the Margravine of Bayreuth speaks in her curious memoirs of a table de confiance which was worked by means of pulleys. " No servants are needed," she says ; " they are replaced by drums placed at the side of the guests, who write what they want on a tablet ; the drums de- scend into the kitchen, and ascend again with the objects required." Forty years later, Loriot, an ingenious man who had discovered 156 DELICATE FEASTING. a means of fixing pastel, invented for Marie Antoinette's service, at Trianon, a table far superior to the Margravine's system of lifts. It was a table which rose through the floor, all served, and accompanied by four little tables, or dumb-waiters, on which were placed the various utensils necessary. A similar ar- rangement is described in Bastide's '' La Pe- tite Maison," already mentioned. XV. ON TABLE-SERVICE. " What neat repast shall feast us, light and choice, Of Attic taste, with wine, whence we may rise To hear the lute well touch'd, or artful voice Warble immortal notes and Tuscan air ? He who of those delights can judge, and spare To interpose them oft is not unwise." John Milton. The desirable thing, in the words of the poet, is a " neat repast." There is not only an art of preparing a delicate feast, but an art of eating one, and this latter art is not so advanced as it might be. Method in eating Is all-important, and the only method is the English, for the EngHsh eat with ease and without embarrassing their neighbors. Du- bois, who had long experience at the court of Berhn, says, in his " Cuisine de Tous les Pays," that it seems difficult and embarrassing to eat according to any method except the Eng- lish, but as he probably had seen many Ger- mans eating differently, he proceeds to ex- 158 DELICATE FEASTING. pound the English method, the whole theory and practice of which consists in using the fork always with the left hand and the knife and spoon with the right. The fork is to be held with the index finger stretched out so as to maintain it in an almost horizontal position. Nothing seems clumsier than to grip the fork with clenched fist and to hold it perpendicular as the Germans often do. Nothing is less " English you know " than to convey food to the mouth with the knife or to touch fish with a knife. When you are not using your knife and fork, lay them on your plate with the handle of the one turned to the right and the handle of the other turned to the left, ready to be taken up at once. The knife and fork should be laid on the plate, the one crossing the other, only when you have finished eating altogether. A case when the fork may be used with the right hand is in eating fish. These points seem so simple and elementary that it would appear useless to put them down in writing, and yet a little experience of tables d'hote, particularly on the European continent, will show that there are still many well-dressed people in this world who eat like savages and not at all according to the English method. ON TABLE-SERVICE. I 59 At a table d'hote in Hanover I remember once sitting beside a German lady, a banker's wife, who borrowed my scarf-pin to pick her teeth with after dinner. This was not only a proof of bad manners, but also of hygienic impru- dence, because a metal toothpick spoils the enamel of the teeth. For toothpicking pur- poses a lentisk stick is best, though a quill is not harmful, as Martial says in one of his epigrams : " Lentiscum melius : sed si tibi frondea cuspis Defuerit, dentes, penna, levare potes." In order to be comfortably seated at table the chair must be neither too high nor too low, and above all it should not be so heavy that it needs an effort to move it an inch, nor should it be rough with carving that sticks into your shoulders when you lean back, or catches and tears the dresses of the women. These details also may seem un- worthy of being written down, but experi- ence has hitherto revealed to me very few reasonably constructed dining-room chairs. A wealthy New York banker recently had made in Europe some massive bronze dining-room chairs. His example is not to be commended. The table-cloth should be laid, not directly l6o DELICATE FEASTING. on the table, but over a thick cotton blanket. The cloth itself should be spotlessly clean, and if this condition exist much will be par- doned ; it may be pure white linen or dam- ask, or it may have a colored pattern woven or embroidered along the edges. The use of color in the pattern of table linen is by no means novel. In the miniatures of the four- teenth and fifteenth centuries the table-cloths and the long, narrow dresser cloths are con- stantly represented with rose or blue stripes and borders. Some luxurious table-cloths nowadays are not only richly embroidered, but also adorned with inserted bands of lace, which give you the sensation of dining off a petticoat. Such excess is to be avoided. The starching and stiffening of table linen as practised in England is not to be recom- mended. The ideal table-cloth is smooth and fair to the eye ; it has no obtrusive glaze ; it is soft to the touch, and its folds are not hard or rigid. As regards the nature and shape of the tables, we have already suggested the advis- ableness of rebelling against the tyranny both of tradition and of the furniture -makers of Grand Rapids (Mich.) and elsewhere. There are hints for hostesses to be found in Paul ON TABLE SERVICE. l6l Veronese's '^ Noces de Cana," and in Lippo Lippi's " Herod's Feast." Lippi's fresco in the cathedral of Prato might be reproduced easily in a Newport villa as a gastronomic tableau vivant. A most important article absolutely nec- essary for happiness at table is the napkin. The napkin should be soft and ample, and absolutely devoid of glaze or starch. The English have a detestable habit of stiffening table-napkins so that they are utterly inde- tergent and therefore useless. In all the de- tails of table-service the chief consideration is appropriateness to the end. Napkins are used to wipe the lips and the fingers, to cover the lap, and even to protect the bust. They should be fair pieces of linen of generous dimensions, say thirty- four by twenty -five inches. May Comus preserve us from the pal- try six-by-nine-inch rag which some Anglo- Saxons would fain foist upon us as napkins. The napkin will of course match the cloth, but if it is embroidered or ornamented in any way, let this decoration in no way interfere with its usefulness, and, above all things, let there be no mottoes or inscriptions '' charm- ingly worked in all kinds of odd places, in one corner, or across the middle, or along 1 1 1 62 DELICATE FEASTING. one or all the sides," as Mrs. Loftie suggests in her little book ''The Dining- Room." "Not only are such devices pretty and ap- propriate," continues Mrs. Loftie, "but they may sometimes afford a subject for dinner conversation when the weather has been ex- haustively discussed." Mrs. Loftie has made many excellent suggestions in her pages about laying the table, but this one is too cruel and too ironical. If people's conversational powers are so limited that they require the motto of a table napkin to help them out, it were better to prohibit conversation at table altogether, and have some one read aloud, as was the custom in the old monasteries, and also at the court of Frederick di Montefeltro, Duke of Urbino, who used to have Plutarch, Xenophon, and Aristotle read to him while he was at table, and thus maintained that serene frame of mind which is necessary for happiness at meals. The knives and forks used at Anglo-Saxon tables are generally larger and heavier than comfort requires. French knives and forks are smaller and quite strong enough for all food that figures on a civilized table. The knife never exceeds nine and three quarters inches in length, the small knives seven and ON TABLE-SERVICE. 163 three quarters inches, and the large forks eight and one quarter inches. Simple knives and forks seem to me to be desirable, and all heavy and elaborate ornamentation should be avoided, especially ornamentation in high relief, which is irritating to handle. On the other hand, variety may be charming. At a dainty dinner I would have knives and forks of a different pattern with every dish. The glasses that figure on a table will de- pend on the wines served ; they should be convenient and elegant in form, and depend- ent for their charm simply on the purity of the crystal and the beauty of their silhouette. Engraved glass, cut glass, and colored glass is used very sparingly by people of taste. Bordeaux, Burgundy, and Champagne wines should be drank out of nothing but the purest crystal glass, which conceals none of their qualities of color or scintillation. It is the custom to drink German wines out of colored glasses. Liqueur glasses are often colored also, but it seems absurd to mask the purity and delicate tones of whatever nectar we may be drinking by serving it in obfuscating glasses of green, blue, red, or any other color. For my part I would admit to thegourmet's table only pure and very simply decorated crystal glass. 164 DELICATE FEASTING. Decanters play a very limited role on the real gourmet's table ; they are used only for such heavy wines as Port and Sherry or for light ordinary Bordeaux. To decant real wines is barbarous ; they should be served directly from the bottles in which they have sojourned while their qualities were ripening ; in the course of being poured from a bottle into a decanter a wine loses some of its aroma, gets agitated, and often catches cold. If the wine served is not real wine you may decant it and do whatever you please with it except serving it to your guests. The great difference between an English table and a French table, whether in a private house or in a restaurant, is, so far as the aspect is concerned, the complication of the former and the simplicity of the latter. The French use fewer utensils, and know nothing of that multiplicity of special apparatus — cruet-stands, sardine-boxes, pickle-forks, sauce- boxes, butter-coolers, biscuit -boxes, pepper- casters, trowels, toast-racks, claret-jugs — and a score other queer inventions which are the pride of English housekeepers, and which tend to encumber an English table to such a degree that there is hardly room left for the plates. The number of objects that fig- ON TABLE-SERVICE. 1 65 ure on an English table is most confusing. You sit down with the contents of a whole cutlery-shop before you, and in the centre rises a majestic, but not immaculate monu- ment, containing specimens of all the condi- ments that Cross & Blackwell ever invented. It is an awful spectacle. In a French house, the articles for table- service are knives, forks, spoons, soup-ladles, salad spoon and fork, a manche a gigot (or handle to screw on to the knuckle-bone of a leg of mutton, so that the carver may hold it while he cuts), a hors d'ceitvre service, some bottle-stands, oil and vinegar stands, salt-cellars, pepper-mills, mustard-pots, hot- water dishes, oyster-forks, asparagus servers, ice-pails, nut-crackers, grape-scissors, crumb- brush and tray, a salver or tray, with a sugar- basin, etc., for tea, and there will be an end of the silver articles. With this apparatus, and the necessary supply of plates, dishes, crockery, glass, and linen, the most delicate and complicated repast may be perfectly served. Nowadays, gold or silver plate is very little used except in a few princely houses. Its absence from the table is not to be regretted ; the noise made by the knife and fork coming 1 66 DELICATE FEASTING. into contact with gold or silver plate is dis- agreeable to the nerves ; the glare and reflec- tions cast upon the face of the diner by his gold or silver plate are disagreeable to the eyes. The gold or silver ware that figures on modern dining-tables should be limited to candlesticks, dessert -stands, and centre ornaments, if such are used. But in this matter it is preferable to follow the example of our ancestors, and if we are the lucky pos- sessors of fine silver, soiipieres by Pierre Ger- main, or ewers by Froment Meurice or the Fannieres, to exhibit them on our buffet or dresser rather than on the table. Remember that the table should be always free for the needs of the service. Let the plates and dishes off which we eat be as fine as our purses can afford. One of the great errors made at the Cafe Anglais, in Paris, is to serve fine food on compara- tively coarse faience, or plates. A simple cut- let tastes all the better if it is served on a porcelain plate of beautiful form and tasteful ornamentation. A refinement in table-serv- ice is to have many sets of porcelain, and to serve each course on dishes and plates of different design ; and, above all things, see that the plates are warm — not burning hot. ON TABLE-SERVICE. 1 6/ but sujfficlently warm not to diminish the heat of the food that is served on them. The gourmet will prefer the exclusive use of ceramic dishes and plates in serving a din- ner, because a metal dish when heated com- municates a slight flavor of its own to the natural flavor of the viands. In the Parisian restaurants, even in the best, they have a vile habit of serving a duck, for instance, on a metal dish, and, while the inaitre d' hotel cuts up the duck and deposits the pieces on the dish, he has a spirit-lamp burning beneath it. The dish thus becomes hot, the gravy bub- bles, the pieces of duck get an extra cooking and absorb the taste of the heated metal, and the result of the whole operation is 7iot roast duck, but oxidized duck. This barbarous op- eration is practised daily, but only very few diners protest, to such a low level has the art of delicate feasting fallen in the country where it once flourished most brilliantly. The manner of serving a dinner is a ques- tion easily settled, provided we bear in mind the fact that it is desirable to let as little time as possible elapse between the cooking of food and the eating of it. This considera- tion militates against the service a la Fra7i- qaise^ and favors the service d la Russe. In 1 68 DELICATE FEASTING. the former system each course is served on the table, and afterwards removed in order to be cut up, while in the latter system the dishes are cut up before being passed round. The service a la Frangaise allows a dish to cool on the table before it is served ; the service a la Russe is incompatible with the art of decorating and mounting dishes, and suppresses altogether the exterior physiog- nomy of the French grande cuisine ^^\\\q\\ is, after all, no great loss. The modern system, dictated by reason and by convenience, is a compromise. The table is decorated simply with fruit, sweetmeats, flowers, and such or- naments as caprice may suggest ; the entrees are handed round on small dishes ; the im- portant pieces, such as roasts and pieces de resistance^ are brought in, each by the maitre d'hotely presented to the mistress of the house, who makes a sign of acknowledg- ment, and then taken off to be cut up by the maitre d'Jiotel on a side table. The carved dish is then handed round by the waiters, and, when all the guests are served, it is placed, if the dish be important enough, on a hot-water stand in front of the host or host- ess, or in the same condition on a side table awaiting the needs of the guests. I am speak- ON TABLE-SERVICE. 1 69 ing always of dinners where the number of the guests is wisely limited ; no other din- ners can be well served, so that it matters little whether they be served a la Riisse or a la Frangaise. By the fusion of the two sys- tems, as above indicated, it is possible to give full and entire satisfaction to the cook, who always has a right to demand that his crea- tions shall be presented for judgment in the most favorable conditions, while, at the same time, the guests have their eyes satisfied by an agreeably arranged table, and their pal- ates respected by being enabled to taste the delicate masterpieces of the cook in all the freshness of their savory succulence. The inconveniences of our modern system of waiting, where the dishes are presented between the guests and to each one's left, have been noticed already and the remedy indicated, namely, the substitution of narrow tables arranged as convenience may dictate, but with the guests seated on one side only, so that the dishes may be presented to them from the front. If such tables were used, their decoration would necessarily be very simple, and composed mainly of candlesticks and vases for flowers. With our modern ta- bles, at which the guests are seated on all I/O DELICATE FEASTING. the sides, the simpler the decoration the bet- ter. It is essential that the view should not be obstructed, and that opposite neighbors should not have to '' dodge " in order to catch a glimpse of each other. At a feast the guest and his comfort should be first considered, and the guest should nev- er be made the slave of the ornaments and accessories of the table. All floral decoration, however it may be arranged, should be kept low, no flowers or foliage being allowed to rise to such a height above the table as to interfere with the free view of each guest over the whole table from end to end, and from side to side. Let the floral decoration be as much as possible witJiout perfume. Nothing is more intolerable to some sensitive natures than an atmosphere impregnated with the odor of violets, roses, or mignonette, particularly dur- ing meals. In future, when the reformed table shall have been introduced, and the custom of sitting on one side only shall have been re- stored, it will be possible to banish the floral decoration from the table itself, and to place it in the form of a wall of verdure and flow- ers as a background to the guests. For ex- ON TABLE-SERVICE. 171 amples, see the various pictures of feasts by the old Florentine painters already men- tioned. For lighting a dinner-table there remains to my mind but one illumination, namely, candles placed on the table itself in handsome flanibeauXy and on the walls in sconces. Gas and electricity are abominations in a dining- room. Any system of lighting which leaves no part of a room in soft shadow is painful to . the eye and fatal to the artistic ensem- ble. For the woman who wishes to show her beauty in the most advantageous condi- tions, and for the gourmet who wishes to feast his palate and his eyes in the most re- fined manner possible, a diner aux bougies is the ideal. At the Rothschild houses in Paris the dinners are served by candlelight, and, if the viands and the wines were as fine as the candlesticks, their dinners would be perfect. In the Baron Edmond de Rothschild's dining-room the air is kept cool in the sum- mer by two columns of crystal ice placed in a bed of flowers and foliage, one at each end of the room, and the floral decoration of the table is composed exclusively of cut orchids. XVI. ON SERVING WINES. The classical theory of serving wines at a dinner is the following : Immediately after the soup dry white wines are offered, such as French wines, Marsala, Sherry, Madeira, dry Syracuse, etc. With the fish dry white wines are also served. With oysters Chablis is preferred. With relev^s of butcher's meat and warm entries red wines. Burgundy or Bordeaux. With cold entrees and other cold pieces fine white wines are served. With the roast come the fine Bordeaux or Champagne wines, or both. With the entre- inetSy Champagne alone. With the dessert, liqueur wines, such as Frontignan, Lunel, Alicante, Malvoisie, Port, Tokay, Lacrima- Christi, etc. The red wines ought to be drank at a temperature of about 55 degrees Fahrenheit. White wines should always be served cold. When a selection of wines figures on the ON SERVING WINES. 1 73 menu in the order above indicated, the table requires to be loaded with wine-glasses, at least half a dozen by the side of each plate, and during the whole dinner the waiters are continually inserting a bottle surreptitiously between every two guests, and murmuring, as they fill the glasses, '* Chateau -Lafitte, 1865," "Clos Vougeot, 1873," etc. Now it seems to me that, among the many practices which interfere with comfort, we must note both the attendants who pass dishes over the shoulders of the guests and the attendants who help wine to the com- pany. The handing round of dishes can be rendered less disagreeable by modifying our current ways of sitting at table. As for the custom of having an attendant to help wine, it might be abolished with advantage if men could be convinced that the drinking of many wines during one meal is a gross form of lux- ury, and one disastrous to the digestive or- gans. The multitude of wines, like the multitude of dishes, served in succession, however care- fully that succession may be ordained, wea- ries the palate and fatigues the stomach. If six fine wines are served in succession in the course of one repast, at least half of the num- 1/4 DELICATE FEASTING. ber are not fully appreciated. As we advo- cate simplicity in the number and in the prep- aration of the dishes, so we recommend sim- plicity in the serving of the wines, for our ob- ject in dining is neither to gorge and guzzle nor yet to get drunk. When we rise from the table we wish to feel our heads clear, our papillae clean, and our tongues free, and, above all, we wish to sleep calmly, and to wake up the next morning fresh and rosy. For my own part, I prefer to drink one wine throughout my dinner, either red Bor- deaux or Burgundy, or a dry Champagne, unsophisticated by the addition of liqueurs or excess of caramel. These wines I drink poured into the glass directly out of their na- tive bottles, and the Champagne, being of the right quality, I do not pollute by contact with ice. Really good natural Champagne should be drunk cool, but not iced. To decant Cham- pagne, whether into jugs with an ice-recepta- cle in the middle, such as modern progress has invented, or into a carafe frappee, as is the custom with the less civilized French drinkers, or to freeze the bottle in the ice- pail, or to put lumps of ice into the glass, are equally barbarous operations. The only Champagne that may be iced is poor and ON SERVING WINES. 1 75 very sweet Champagne, whose sugary taste is masked by coldness. At a truly scientific feast, where all the con- ditions of success exist, both as regards the limitation of the guests to the number of the Muses as a maximum, and also as regards the perfection of the viands, both in quality and in dressing, it is easy to dispense with the attendants who would be required to help wine at an ordinary dinner. At this scien- tific feast each man would have his bottle. I will even go further, and say that not only would each man have his bottle of Cham- pagne or his bottle of whatever other wine there might be, but also each man would have his leg of mutton, his duck, his par- tridge, his pheasant. This method alone is truly satisfactory, because it renders envy and favoritism impossible. A partridge has only one breast, and a leg of mutton has only a few slices which are ideal. Evidently, if the partridge or the leg of mutton has to be divided between several guests, one or more of them will be sacrificed for the benefit of the other or others. This is undesirable ; you do not invite people to dinner in order to subject them to martyrdom ; you do not accept an invitation to dinner with a view to 176 DELICATE FEASTING. displaying moral qualities, such as self-abne- gation. The Russians have noble views on this point. Once I was invited to dinner by a Russian gentleman, who had asked me pre- viously if he could serve me any special dish. I begged that I might taste a certain Rus- sian mutton. When the dinner was served a whole sheep was carried in steaming hot on the shoulders of four Tartar waiters, and I was asked to select the part that pleased me best, the whole dish being at my disposal. So, with this question of wine, if we have wine let it be served in abundance, and let each guest have his bottle, and as many bot- tles as his thirst demands. The above remarks do not apply without reserve to family life and quotidian domestic repasts ; they are addressed to gourmets and to men who wish to do honor to their friends by giving them a real dinner. In order to feast delicately, it is perhaps necessary to be an egoist. The company of friends, or at least of one friend, is indispen- sable. A man cannot dine alone. But the happiness of each guest must be ministered to independently of the happiness of the oth- ers, and for that reason we advocate the ser- vice by unities — a complete dinner for each ON SERVING WINES. 1 77 guest, so far at least as the chief dishes are concerned. This idea is not novel. For that matter, there are no novel ideas worth talking about. Tallemant des Reaux, in his '' His- toriettes," relates that the French poet Mal- herbe, who flourished at the end of the six- teenth century, one day '' gave a dinner to six of his friends. The whole feast consisted merely of seven boiled capons, one for each man, for he said that he loved them all equal- ly, and did not wjsh to be obliged to serve to one the upper joint and to another the wing." The smaller the dinner the better will be the chance of its being well-cooked. In these days of wealth and parade the " aristologist " craves after simplicity. The late Mr. Walker, author of "The Orig- inal," wrote a series of papers on the "Art of Dining," which contain many good hints. Walker was a partisan of simplicity. " Com- mon soup," he says, " made at home, fish of little cost, any joints, the cheapest vege- tables, some happy and unexpensive intro- duction, provided everything is good in qual- ity, and the dishes are well dressed and served hot and in succession, with their adjuncts, will insure a quantity of enjoyment which no one need be >afraid to offer." 12 1/8 DELICATE FEASTING. Thus we see that delicate eating and deli- cate drinking are not questions of many kinds of wines, multitudes of dishes, or great state of serving-men, but rather of fineness of the quality of all that is offered, simplicity and daintiness in its preparation, rapidity and convenience in the serving of it, and appre- ciativeness on the part of the guests. That marvellous story-writer, Guy de Mau- passant, says : " A man is a gourmet as he is a poet or an artist, or simply learned. Taste is a delicate organ, perfectible and worthy of respect like the eye and the ear. To be want- ing in the sense of taste is to be deprived of an exquisite faculty, of the faculty of dis- cerning the quality of aliments just as one may be deprived of the faculty of discerning the qualities of a book or of a work of art ; it is to be deprived of an essential sense, of a part of human superiority ; it is to belong to one of the innumerable classes of cripples, infirm people, and fools of which our race is composed ; it is, in a word, to have a stupid mouth just as we have a stupid mind. A man who does not distinguish between a laii- gouste and a lobster, between a herring, that admirable fish that carries within it all the savors and aromas of the sea, and a mack- ON SERVING WINES. 1 79 erel or a whiting, is comparable only to a man who could confound Balzac with Eugene Sue and a symphony by Beethoven with a military march composed by some regimental band-master. XVII. THE ART OF EATING AT TABLE. Erasmus of Rotterdam, towards the end of his career, in 1530, wrote, for the use of the. young prince, Henry of Burgundy, a ht- tle treatise in Latin, "De CiviHtate Morum Puerihum," which was very soon afterwards translated into EngHsh by Robert Whyting- ton, and many times into French, under the title of '* Traits de Civilite Puerile et Hon- nete." This little treatise, which has re- mained until almost our own times a text- book in French schools, is the first special and complete book of etiquette composed in modern Europe, the first distinct study of good manners as a humble branch of philos- ophy. In this little book we shall find the elements of our modern table -manners for- mulated in a few brief axioms, such as the following : " Do not pick your teeth with the point of your knife, nor with your finger-nail, as dogs THE ART OF EATING AT TABLE. i8l and cats do, nor with your napkin ; make use of a splinter of lentiscus wood, or a quill, or of those small bones which are found in the legs of fowls. '* Gayety is becoming at table, but not ef- frontery. Do not sit down without having washed your hands and cleaned your nails. When you wipe your hands drive away all morose thoughts ; at meals you ought not to seem sad yourself nor to sadden others. Nmn m convivio nee tristeni esse deeet nee eontris- tare quenqnamy Erasmus further recommends children not to put their elbows on the table ; not to wriggle on their chairs, but to sit upright ; and to lay their napkin on the left shoulder or the left arm. " The drinking-glass should be placed on the right, also the knife for cut- ting meat, nicely wiped (cttltellus escariiis rite pici'gatzis) ; the bread on the left. *' To begin a meal by drinking is the act of drunkards, who drink from habit and not from thirst. It is not only bad manners, but bad for the health. Before drinking, finish what food you have in your mouth, and do not approach your lips to the glass until you have wiped them with your napkin or your handkerchief. 1 82 DELICATE FEASTING. ^*To lick your greasy fingers, or to wipe them on your clothes, is equally bad man- ners ; it is better to make use of the table- cloth or of your napkin. '' Do not gnaw bones with your teeth, like a dog ; pick them clean with the aid of a knife. " Help yourself to salt with the aid of a knife. " It is good that varied conversation should create some intervals in the continuity of a meal. Miilieres ornat silentmm, sed magis pueritiamP (These Latin words may be translated by some bold man who will pref- ace his remarks by declaring that he does not agree with Erasmus, so far at least as the ladies are concerned.) *' In placing a dish on the table, and in fill- ing up a glass, never use your left hand. " To speak with your mouth full is both impolite and dangerous." Now, from the above maxims, and from the whole treatise, as well as from other writ- ings of Erasmus, we may justly conclude that he was a refined and urbane gentleman ; and those who followed his precepts would cer- tainly be charming hosts and agreeable guests, for in his remarks on table -manners THE ART OF EATING AT TABLE. 1 83 he has touched upon all the points that are essential to decency, comfort, and good-feel- ing. These points concern three matters, namely, the laying of the table, the serving of the meats, and the behavior and frame of mind of the guests. A veteran writer, Theophile Gautier, who uttered that famous axiom so saddening to journalists, " Daily newspapers are published every day," also fathered a paradox in con- tradiction to the lamentation of the Preacher: — " There is nothing new under the sun," said the pessimistic Hebrew. *' Everything is new and hitherto unpublished," replied Gautier, " totit est iitedity For this reason I have quoted some observations of Erasmus of Rot- terdam on table-manners, and now beg leave to gloss and comment upon them, beginning with the very important detail of toothpicks and picking teeth. The use of fine chicken- bones, which Erasmus recommended, we should now consider rustic. The only tooth- picks that hygiene and convenience admit are wooden splinters or quills. Gold or silver toothpicks are dangerous, because the metal may scratch or chip the enamel of the teeth. The use of the precious metals for making such a mean instrument as a toothpick is an 1 84 DELICATE FEASTING. example of snobbishness. An ivory tooth- pick is also objectionable, because the ivory- is absorbent, and in the course of use be- comes unclean. Use a toothj)ick, and throw it away after- wards. You do not want to carry a toothpick in your pocket unless you are travelling in barbarous or over-squeamish countries. Here the question arises : " How is the toothpick to be used ?" The reply is : '^ Sim- ply, without affectation, and without obsti- nacy." At some of the best tables at which I have had the honor of sitting in Europe I found a quill toothpick laid at the foot of the wine-glasses, as being as indispen- sable a part of the convert, or service, as a knife and fork. But, unless I deliberately watched for a certain length of time, thereby losing the enjoyment of a part of the dinner — which, you may be sure, was not often the case — I never noticed guests using these toothpicks. And yet they certainly did use them, but, when doing so, they did not hoist the white flag to call the attention of the whole table to the operation, as those persons do who try to hide their faces behind their napkin. This manoeuvre, so common among the Americans, is at best a false -prudery, THE ART OF EATING AT TABLE. 1 85 worthy only of the intelligence of an ostrich. To hold up your napkin so is simply to make a signal, as who should say : '' Now, look out. I'm going to pick my teeth. See how ashamed I am of the clumsy way in which I do the said picking." Such picking of teeth as is necessary for comfort may be done at table without any holding up of napkins, without any clumsy holding of the hand before the mouth, which is almost as ostentatious as the white-flag signal, and, above all, without any scraping, smacking, or sucking noises. The essence of good table-manners lies in not making your- self remarked, and in not making yourself in any way disagreeable to your neighbors. A table-knife is to be used to cut food, and never to convey food to the mouth, which is the function of forks and spoons. Nevertheless, you constantly see people eat- ing cheese with a knife. The treatise on ** Civilite Puerile et Honnete," used in the an- cient and well-mannered school where I was brought up, expressly forbade this usage. Dry cheese, I was taught, should be cut into small pieces on your plate as need requires, and each piece taken up delicately with the fingers and so conveyed to the mouth ; l86 DELICATE FEASTING. > soft cheese should be spread with the knife on each mouthful of bread ; frothy cheese, like cream-cheese, should be eaten with a spoon. The Anglo-Saxons are afraid to use their fingers to eat with, especially the English. Thanks to this hesitation, I have seen, in the course of my travels in the Old World, many distressing sights. I have seen ladies at- tempt to eat a craw -fish {ecrevisse) with a knife and fork and abandon the attempt in despair. I have also seen men in the same fix. I have seen — oh, barbarous and cruel spectacle! — Anglo-Saxons, otherwise appar- ently civilized, cut off the points of aspara- gus and, with a fork, eat only these points, thus leaving the best part of the vegetable on their plates. As for artichokes, they gen- erally utterly defeat the attacks of those who trust simply to the knife and fork. Fingers must be used for eating certain things, notably asparagus, artichokes, fruit, olives, radishes, pastry, and even small fried fish ; in short, everything which will not dirty or grease the fingers may be eaten with the fingers. For my own part I prefer to eat lettuce salad with my fingers rather than with a fork, and Queen Marie Antoinette THE ART OF EATING AT TABLE. 1 8/ and other ladies of the eighteenth century- were of my way of thinking. If the ladies could only see how pretty is their gesture when their diaphanous forefinger and thumb grasp a leaf of delicate green lettuce and raise that leaf from the porcelain plate to their rosy lips, they would all immediately take to eating salad a la Marie Antoinette. Only bear in mind, good ladies, that if you do wish to eat lettuce salad with your fingers you must mix the salad with oil and vine- gar, and not with that abominable, ready- made white "salad-dressing," to look upon which is nauseating. May Heaven preserve us from excessive Anglomania in matters of table-service and eating ! The English tend to complicate the eating-tools far too much. They have too many forks for comfort, and the forms of them are too quaint for practical utility. Certainly, silver dessert knives and forks are very good in their way, because they are not susceptible to the action of fruit acids, but it is vain and clumsy to attempt to make too-exclusive use of the knife and fork in eating fruit. Don't imitate, for instance, certain ultra - correct English damsels who eat cherries with a fork and swallow the stones because they are too 1 88 DELICATE FEASTING. modest, or, rather, too asinine, to spit them out on to the plate. Eating is not a thing to be ashamed of. To thoroughly enjoy a peach you must bite it and feel the juicy, perfumed flesh melt in your mouth. But, let the Anglomaniacs say what they please, there is no necessity of sticking a fork into the peach and peeling it while so impaled, as if it were an ill-favored and foul object. A peach is as beautiful to the touch as it is to the eye ; a peach held between human fin- gers has its beauty enhanced by the beauty of the fingers. However dainty and ornate the silver dessert -knife and fork may be, it always irritates me to see people cut up their peaches, or pears, or apricots, or what not, into cubes and parallelopipeds, as if dessert were a branch of conic sections. Imitate Marie Antoinette, ladies : use your fingers more freely ; eat decently, of course, but do not be the slaves of silly Anglomania or New- port crazes. To eat a pear or an apple con- veniently cut it into quarters, and peel each quarter in turn as you eat it. The peach, too, can be cut into quarters if the eater is timid. Apricots do not need peeling, nor plums either. Who would be bold enough to peel a fresh fig, or even to touch such a THE ART OF EATING AT TABLE. 1 89 delicate fruit with even the purest silver in- struments ? I have referred to the disastrous discom- fiture of English men and women by a dish of crawfish. This dish, not being of com- mon occurrence in America or England, might be neglected by an unthoughtful writ- er, but as fifty thousand Americans visit Eu- rope every year, and as I could wish them all, when in France or Belgium, to taste this meat, I will add a note on the way of tack- ling it. The three chief forms in which you will find the crawfish served in Europe are as a coiilis in potage bisque^ generally, alas ! much adulterated with carrots and rice flour; boiled in a court-bouillon and served as ecre- visses en buisson ; cooked in a rich and highly spiced sauce which produces ecrevisses a la Bordelaise. In all these forms the crawfish, which, as you know, of course, is a sort of min- iature fresh-water lobster, is excellent. The soup you eat, naturally, with a spoon. Of the ecrevisses en buisson you help yourself, with your fingers, to a bunch of half a dozen ; take them one by one ; pull off and crack and suck the claws ; break the shell with your teeth or with nut-crackers, and extract the dainty flesh of the tail. After this dish it is 1 90 DELICATE FEASTING. necessary to pass round finger-bowls and to change the napkins. Ecrevisses a la Borde- laise must be eaten in the same manner ; fin- ger-bowls and clean napkins, if not a com- plete bath, are necessary after the consump- tion of a good dish of this succulent crusta- cean. It being desirable that people's table- manners should be equal to any emergency, whether they are in their own country or engaged in foreign travel, I will add that the use of salt-spoons is not universal in this world. If you happen to be at a table where the host, recalcitrant to progress, has not invested any capital in vermeil, silver, or bone salt-spoons, help yourself to salt with the point of your knife, as Erasmus of Rot- terdam tells you, having previously wiped it on your plate or on a bit of bread. Do 7iot attempt to help yourself to salt with the handle of your fork or spoon. In countries where salt-spoons are not held in honor, such an attempt would be esteemed a mark of ill- breeding. The use of the table-napkin not being thoroughly understood in some remote parts of the earth, only recently opened to the march of civilization, it may be well to state THE ART OF EATING AT TABLE. 191 that the napkin should not be used for mop- ping a perspiring brow, or wiping your nose, or indeed for wiping anything but your mouth and fingers. When you sit down to table you ought to find. your napkin neatly folded and placed on your plate with a fair piece of bread or a roll inside it. The most worthy person at table having set the example, you place the bread to the right of your plate, un- fold your napkin entirely and lay it over your knees loosely. You may have heard travel- lers scoff at the practical Frenchman who stuffs one corner of his napkin inside his shirt-collar and spreads it fully over the front of his person from his chin down to his knees. This is the practice of the French people of the middle and lower classes, who are thrifty and prudent, and who wish to eat at their ease and not to spot their clothes. There is nothing ridiculous in this practice. There is a reason, and an excellent reason, for so spread- ing the napkin, and if I were dining at home, or alone at a restaurant or club, and had on my spotless shirt and open Avaistcoat and claw-hammer coat, all ready to go to the op- era, I should certainly spread my napkin over my manly and snowy bosom, just as the Frenchman does, and so I should dine at my 192 DELICATE FEASTING. ease, serenely and without care, knowing that I had thus insured the immaculateness of my hnen. However, let it be remembered that company manners, in all countries, re- quire you simply to spread your napkin loosely over your knees and to eat cleanly and decently. With the dessert-plate, and on it, appears the mouth-bowl or the finger-bowl. That excellent lady, Madame la Comtesse de Gen- lis, who was governess to the children of the Due d'Orleans, one of whom became King Louis Philippe of France, wrote in her '' Dic- tionnaire Critique et Raisonne des Etiquettes de la Cour," published in 1818: "Formerly women, after dinner or supper, rose and left the table to rinse out their mouths ; the men, and even the princes of royal blood, out of respect for the women, did not allow them- selves to remain in the dining-room to do the same thing ; they passed into an anteroom. Nowadays this species of toilet is performed at table in many houses, where you see Frenchmen sitting next to women wash their hands and spit in a bowl. This spectacle is a very astonishing one for their grandfathers and grandmothers." The good Madame de Genlis adds that this usage comes from Eng- THE ART OF EATING AT TABLE. 1 93 land, and that the custom is, certainly, not French. The noble dame also subjoins an indignant note to the effect that Plutarch styled the dinner-table as the '' altar of the gods of friendship and of hospitality." Certainly the operation of using a mouth- bowl is far from pleasing to contemplate, but it is very convenient ; it conduces to comfort, and, provided it be generally practised, no- body thinks anything about it. The mate- rial side of eating cannot be other than disa- greeable if looked at from an absolute point of view, instead of from the point of view of usage and convenience. Food and the act of eating, masticating, and swallowing are in themselves disgusting phenomena. That hor- ribly snobbish and conceited Lord Byron — I mean the famous poet — used to profess that the spectacle of a pretty woman eating filled him with horror; and, after all, a civilized man devouring, with all possible good-breed- ing, a slice of roast beef, is as disagree- able a sight as a crow tearing and devour- ing a piece of carrion. But eating being a necessity, nature and civilization have taken care to surround the operation with every- thing that tends to distract the attention from the material side ; and they have suc- 13 194 DELICATE FEASTING. ceeded so completely that not one man out of a thousand knows anything about the physiology of eating or the chemistry of food. Eating has become a social as well as a nat- ural act ; it has been sublimated by the idea of hospitality ; the festive board has ac- quired a certain solemnity from its con- nection with the great festivals of the fam- ily ; and dinner has become the highest function of home life, a daily act to which no other can be compared in importance and results. To return to the mouth-bowl, when once its convenience has been recognized it can- not be regarded as any more objectionable than a toothpick, and it must be made use of in the same spirit, simply, without osten- tation, and without false shame. The most appropriate bowls are made of white, dark blue, or opal glass, about three inches deep and four and one half in diameter, either round or square, and in each bowl is served a little goblet to match, containing tepid wa- ter perfumed with mint or orange flower just sufficiently to take away the disagreeable in- sipidity of warm water. If you wish to per- form the complete operation, you take a lit- tle water into your mouth and roll it about THE ART OF EATING AT TABLE. I95 without making strange noises or still strang- er grimaces, but discreetly and in a manner such as to rinse your teeth and gums ; mean- while you have emptied the rest of the water out of the goblet into the bowl, where you dip your finger-tips; then, having sufficient- ly washed your fingers, you raise the bowl to your mouth, spit the water out of your mouth into it, replace the empty goblet in the bowl, and the waiter removes the object, while you wipe your mouth and your fingers on your napkin, the whole business being the affair of half a minute. Of course, if you are at a table where the mouth-rinsing is not gen- erally practised, you will abstain ; but let us hope that it will not be your misfortune to dine at a table where finger-bowls are not known. If such is your unhappy lot, you are quite justified in filling up a glass of water, dipping your finger-tips in it, and even moistening your napkin in order the better to wipe your lips clean before leaving the table. These small operations, trivial as they may seem, are necessary for comfort and for cleanliness ; and cleanliness, it has been said, is next to godliness. XVIII. ON BEING INVITED TO DINE. In the grammar in which I learned the ele- ments of the Spanish tongue, one of the ex- ercises, I remember, began as follows : '' I like to dine always at home ; an invitation incon- veniences me. Nevertheless, it is necessary to take account of the requirements of soci- ety. I have never desired to appear rude, nor have I been wanting in the consideration that is due to friends." An American lady, who has devoted much time to the study of the social habits of Eu- rope, and who has imparted to her country- men the results of her observations in lect- ures which have given her rank as an author- ity on matters of comparative civilization, once confided to me her disappointment at the reception that she had met with at the hands of the Spaniards during a holiday tour in the Castilles and Andalusia. ^' I started," she said, ** with many letters of introduction ON BEING INVITED TO DINE. I97 to the best people in Madrid and Seville. I presented my letters. The people returned my call ; that is to say, the men did. They also placed their carriages and servants at my disposal, and obtained for me permis- sions to view libraries and to touch relics of the greatest sanctity. But none of them in- vited me to dinner, or even to take so much as a cup of tea." From this fact the amiable sociologist con- cluded that the Spaniards are inhospitable and disagreeable people, without reflecting that there was no reason why the Spaniards should change their habits for her sake, and that though her desire to pry into their home- life might be legitimate from an absolute point of view, it was the height of indiscreetness from the semi-Oriental point of view of Moor- ish Spain, which still retains all its force in contemporary Spain. The Spaniards, it is true, are chary of invitations. Their home is very sacred. They do not ask the new ac- quaintance to dine with them five minutes after being introduced. Like the man in the Spanish grammar, they consider an invita- tion as an inconvenience, not so much be- cause they are of inhospitable nature or be- cause they have no spare cash to speak of, 198 DELICATE FEASTING. but because, like the patriarchs of old, they look upon hospitality as a very grave matter, and a duty in the discharge of which no sac- rifices are to be spared. Consequently, if they cannot entertain in a satisfactory man- ner, they prefer to shirk the task rather than perform it in a halting and make-shift way. This sentiment is thoroughly laudable, and in conformity with the best traditions of those ancient civilizations of the East from which we derive our own. Never invite a man to dine lightly, as you would ask him to take a cigarette. As P. Z. Didsbury remarked, in terms of unforgetable laconism, " A man can dine but once a day." How great, then, is the responsibility of him who ventures to take upon himself the providing and serving of this dinner! Furthermore, whenever, for reasons which we need not examine, you are invited to dine, and you accept the invitation, do not be in too great a hurry to return the compliment. In nine cases out of ten the blackest ingrati- tude of which you could be capable would be to invite your amphitryon and inflict upon him a return dinner. Doubtless, in an ideal state of things, it would often be delightful to accept an invi- ON BEING INVITED TO DINE. 1 99 tation to dinner. As it is, an invitation from people with whose hearts and minds I am not familiar fills me with terror. If I accept, I say to myself, What will befall me ? In their wish to do me honor and give me pleasure, have my would-be hosts realized the gravity of the deed they are about to perpetrate ? Have they devoted thought to the subject of dining? Having invited me to dine, do they know how to dine themselves? Will the temperature of their dining-room be nei- ther too high nor too low ? Will the lights be so arranged that my eyes will not be daz- zled, and that restful bits of shadow will re- main soothingly distributed about the room? Will the chairs be the outcome of reason, or merely of the furniture-maker's caprice ? Will there be a draught under the table or over it? Will the table-service be agreeable to the eye? Will the food be real food ? These and a score other interrogations rise to my lips, and finally I put to myself the clinching ques- tion, ** Shall I be sick before or after the or- deal ?'* And, as a rule, I prefer to be sick before the dinner, and send an excuse, thus making sure of avoiding sickness after it. My feigned indisposition often deprives me of charming company, but it does not pre- 200 DELICATE FEASTING. vent me repairing to a restaurant where I am sure of combining a menu to suit my palate and where I have the right to criticise and refuse whatever is unworthy. This confession may seem to imply an un- sociable nature. On the contrary, it is the lamentation of a victim of sociability. My experience, which, without having extended over many lustres, has perhaps compensated for its brevity by extreme application and un- tiring assiduity, has demonstrated, generally speaking, that the people who have invited me to dine with them would have done bet- ter to have had themselves invited to dine with me. By dint of pondering over gastronomic dis- asters for which kindly disposed friends and acquaintances were responsible, I have con- ceived certain projects of reform, all more or less chimerical. I have wondered, for in- stance, why, in countries where rational gov- ernments exist, and where a minister is ap- pointed to attend to the interests of the fine arts, with, under him, directors, deputy-direct- ors, inspectors, and a dozen grades of minor functionaries, no emperor, king, or republic has yet thought of creating a Minister of Gastronomy. Hitherto the sad fact remains ON BEING INVITED TO DINE. 201 that the Art of Delicate Feasting does not receive state encouragement in any country on the face of the whole earth. Not only do governments ignore or neglect the gastronomic art, but even private initia- tive and private endowment are wanting. Be- nevolent citizens leave money for the foun- dation of institutions of all kinds ; important sums are bequeathed for the endowment of research ; but no one has ever yet thought of instituting a permanent Gastronomic Acade- my or of endowing a chair of gastronomic criticism in our existing educational estab- lishments. Criticism, this is what we need. It was criticism and the incessant exigencies of competent critics which made the great cooks and the great restaurants of the past. Criticism alone can save private and public cookery from irremediable decadence and re- store the art of delicate feasting to the emi- nent place it deserves in the preoccupations of civilized humanity. With this conviction at heart, I conceived an idea which seemed to me quite practical, namely, the formation of an International League for the protection of diners-out and for the general advance- ment of the art of delicate feasting. Con- sidering the misadventures that befall one in 202 DELICATE FEASTING. private houses, and the slovenly and Inartistic ways that are rapidly becoming traditional even in some of the oldest and best restau- rants of the world, it is desirable that meas- ures should be taken to make criticism effect- ual and productive of reform. It might be going too far, perhaps, to suggest that a man has a right to ask for references when he is invited to dine in a strange house. On the other hand, it would be a great boon if one could obtain some information not only about private houses, but also about public restau- rants, in the various cities of the world where civilized men do most congregate. Hence the idea of a league of diners-out and of an information and inquiry office, where notes about hosts and hostesses might be central- ized and communicated to the members of the league in the interests of the culinary art as well as of public health in general. (Here, for instance, are some samples of the entries which an information-office of this kind might catalogue : " Mrs. A. : Sauces dangerous, red wines fair, Champagne third rate, company good. Robust members of the league only can vent- ure to sit at Mrs. A.'s table. This hostess has been warned, but hitherto disdains criticism. ON BEING INVITED TO DINE. 203 " Mrs. B. : Soup always bad ; plates insuf- ciently heated ; claret dangerously adulter- ated ; coffee-cups cold. " Mrs. C. : Serves tepid coffee, made with essence, in cups that have not been previ- viously warmed. Dinner elaborate ; nothing but entrees ; nothing to eat. This table is pretentious and hopeless. Mrs. C. is an old offender. Two habitues of her Tuesday din- ner-parties died last year. (N.B. — These un- fortunate victims were not members of the league.) '' Mrs, D. : In this house the pepper-mill is unknown ; uses ready-made salad-dressing ; the fifth chair to the hostess's right hand is in a violent draught. " Mrs. E.: Cooking excellent; service fair; cellar not deleterious, but far from ideal ; Champagne good. This lady, unfortunately, insists upon decorating the table with strong- ly smelling flowers. Her case is interesting, and recommended to members of the league who have persuasive talent and a taste for evangelizing. '^ Mrs. F. : Serves game on silver dishes, with spirit-lamp burning beneath ; result, ox- idized snipe. ** Mrs. G. : Member of the league ; makes 204 DELICATE FEASTING. great efforts to satisfy the requirements of high gastronomic art ; coffee perfect ; both the cups, the spoons, and even the sugar, are warmed." -^Y gave pubHcity to this, as I thought, brill- iant and original idea of an International League, in an article published in a most influential London newspaper about a year ago ; but, to my sorrow, nobody has yet of- fered to become a member, although I did not suggest that any subscription would be levied. In presence of such indifference, what is to be done? How can we revive the spirit of criticism which alone can rescue the art of cookery from its actual state of decadence? The case seems almost hopeless, for the men of the present generation do not appear to have the sentiment of the table ; they know neither its varied resources nor its infi- nite refinements ; their palates are dull, and they are content to eat rather than to dine. The delicate feaster is, nowadays, a rarity, and a man of thirty or thirty-five years of age who knows how to order a dinner scien- tifically, and to avoid even elementary sole- cisms, is a still greater rarity. In modern ON BEING INVITED TO DINE. 20$ Paris, formerly the Mecca of gourmands, it is becoming most difficult to dine, and every- where, even in the best restaurants — we will say no more about private houses — we see the disastrous consequences of the absence of crhjicism. Both cooking and service suf- fer. 'At the Cafe Anglais, while the cooking remains excellent, the waiters are inadequate both in number and in intelligence ; the but- tons of their waistcoats are frequently denud- ed of cloth, and their threadbare dress-coats are covered with grease-spots. And yet no- body complains. Our European contempo- raries devote no thought to such important details as the training and dressing of wait- ers, thereby showing themselves to be less civilized than the Russians, whose Tartar waiters are exemplary both in noiseless at- tention and in appropriate costume of spot- less purity. In the Parisian and European restaurants of the present day the tendency is to pre- pare the food and to organize the service as if a restaurant were a buffet. The cartes of old, so infinitely varied, have disappeared, to make way for the summary carte dii jour. In other words, cookery has become an in- dustry rather than an art, and the object of 206 DELICATE FEASTING. the cook is to furnish rapidly large quantities of '' portions " rather than to prepare daintily a few dishes that will win for him the com- pliments of connoisseurs. The reasons of this phenomenon are manifold. The hurry and unrest of contemporary life do not con- duce to the appreciation of fine cooking, nor is fine cooking possible where it is necessary to prepare food in very large quantities. But why are the restaurants of the very highest class declining in excellence? Can they not count upon the patronage not only of the ilite of the gourmands of Paris, but also — thanks to club-trains and swift communica- tions of all kinds — upon the patronage of the gastronomers of the whole world ? This is true, but with important reserves. The de- cline of the art of cookery in the Parisian- restaurants is due chiefly to the development of club-life ! The men of fashion, leisure, or wealth who would formerly have lived at the restaurants now dine at the table d'hote of their clubs, between two feverish seances at the baccarat-table, and thus the restaurants have lost that nucleus of regular and fastidi- ous customers which, by its readiness to crit- icise and appreciate, obliged and encouraged the chef to keep up the traditions of the dain- ON BEING INVITED TO DINE. 207 ty palates of the past. At present the great restaurants of Paris depend for support as much on foreigners as on resident Parisians ; their patrons are, therefore, unstable, and the criticism of their cookery less constant and less rigorous than it used to be. Once more the word " criticism " flows from the point of my pen, and sums^up the whole gist of the preceding pages. ' Without criticism there can be no delicate feasting. How often you hear people say, '' Oh ! I am not particular. I do not pay any atten- tion to what I eat." Certainly we can con- ceive that there are men devoid of the senses of taste and smell, just as we can conceive men for whom exquisite flowers, beautiful women, fine pictures, or incomparable stat- ues have no charm. But such men are to be pitied, supposing that we deign to accord them any manifestation of interest whatever. Whether our object be to get out of life the greatest amount of pleasure or the greatest amount of work, or both together, it is good policy to pay great attention to what we eat, and to strive in this, as in all that we under- take, to attain perfection. INDEX. Albumen, digestion of, 17. Allspice for seasoning pasties, etc., 56. Artichokes, a la Barigotile, 45 ; garnish for, 46 ; how to cook, 45 ; how to eat, 45 ; to serve, 47. Asparagus, cooking of, 42 ; dish for serving, 44 • how to eat, 44 ; tongs for serv- ing, 44 ; when to gather. 42. Beans, cooking of dried, 37 ; string, a la Fran^aise, 48 ; to boil, 38. Beef, nutritive value of, 30; time required for digestion of, 33- Beef-tea, how to make, 23. Boiling, 23 ; action of, on meat, 24 ; temperature for. Bouillon, basis of good cook- ing, gi ; composition of, 87, 88 ; court, how to make, 57 ; grand, 106 ; how long may be kept, 92 ; in cook- ing artichokes, 46 ; in lai- tues ail Jus, 50 ; in mate- lote, 61 ; in potage, 85 ; in potato salad, 77 ; meat used in, 23 ; not an ali- 14 ment, 87 ; qualities de- manded in, 89 ; salts of potash in, 88 : stimulating power of, 88. Bouqicet garni, for season- ii^g. 55 ; ii^ matelote, 61. Bread, digestion of, 31 ; with soup, 93. Brine, effect on muscular tis- sue, 30. Broiling, conditions for, 19. Broth, most appetizing, 30. Butter, affecting digestion, 29 , for cooking, 30. Candles on dining - table, 171. Carrots, 35, Caterers, 66. Cauliflower, au gratin, 40 ; saute', 42 ; to cook, 40. Chapon, for seasoning salad, 74. Chateaubriand, how to pre- pare a, 102. Cheese, how to eat, 186 ; in cauliflower, 42 ; nutritive value of, 31. Chemistry, knowledge of, necessary to a good cook, Coffee, action of, on nerves, 126 ; Audiger's rule for 2IO INDEX. making, 122 ; berries, 126 ; black, 126, 130 ; crushing berries of, 130 ; decoction of, 123 ; directions for making, 126 ; egg in, 126 ; filters for, 126 ; in Eng- land, 120 *, loaf-sugar in, 131 ; quantity for a cup, 128; results of drinking, 122 ; sweetening cold, 131 ; to preserve aroma of, 127 ; Turkish, 128, 130. Consotmne, definition of, 86 ; in shell-fish soup, 93 ; nec- essary to fine soup, 86 ; qualities of a good, 89. Cook-books, 12 ; to whom useful, 13. Cooking, best methods of, 28 ; decline of fine, in Paris, 206 ; delicate, stim- ulates appetite, 25 ; effect of, on muscular tissue, 15 ; effect of, on olive oil, 22 ; era of fine, 106 ; French, reason of superiority of, 54 ; idea of quintessential, 107 ; increases digestibility of blood, 1 6 ; insufficient or excessive heat in, 25 ; principles of, 12 ; recipes for, R. Estcourt, 9 ; why generally bad, 8. Copper pan for boiling vege- tables, 38, Court-bouillon, for cooking fish, 57, 58 ; to make, 57 ; vinegar or lemon in, 58, Crawfish, how to eat, 189. Crime, definition of, 86 ; qualities required in, 89. Croittons for soup, 93. Decanters, 164, Decanting tea, 124 ; wine, 164, 174. Decoction of meat, 22 ; of tea, 123, 124. Digestion, how assisted, 28 ; comparison of, of different foods, 31 ; time required for different foods, 33 ; time varies with different people, 34. Dining in Florence, in Re- naissance, 151 ; in Middle Ages, 150 ; late Reyniere's idea of, 10 ; pleasures of, Brillat-Savarin, 2 ; without ceremony, 1 1. Dining-room, armor in, 133 ; cooling Rothschild's, 171 ; decoration of, 132, 133 ; display of dishes in, 133 ; in French villa, 135 ; flow- ers in, 134 ; of Directory epoch, 136 ; of Henri II., 133 ; of Lord Lonsdale, 134 ; of Mme. de Pompa- dour, 135 ; personality in arrangement of, 134; Pom- peian style of decorating, 137; rare - colored, 135; Whistler's, 138. Dinner-parties, progressive, 2. Dishes, metal, 167. Duck, a la Portugaise, 109 ; time required for digestion of» 33 ; wrong method of serving, 167. Eating, a social act, 194 ; by candle-light, no; fruit, 188 ; salad, a la Alarie Antoinette, 187 ; with fin- gers, 186. Eggs, composition of, 17 ; digestion of, 31, 33. INDEX. 211 Entrees, different kinds of, 117 ; how served, 168 ; sauce for, 118 ; travaille'es, 117, 118. Farce in cabbages for soup, 94. Fatty substances, digestion of, 16, 28. Feast, sumptuous, of Queen Elentherilide, 153. Figs. 115. Finger-bowls, 192, 195. Fish, digestibihty of, 30, 31, 33 ; matelote of, 60, 62 , nutritive value of, 30. Flowers for the table, 170. Food, digestibility of differ- ent kinds of, 33 ; fried, why hurtful, 28 ; properly cooked, aids digestion, 28 ; variety in, 29. Forks, 162 ; how to use at table, 158. Fowl, nutritive value of, 30 ; time required for digestion, 33. French Revolution, cooks of the, 108. Fried food, injurious, 28 ; sole, chapelure for, 22. Fruit, eating, at table, 187, 188 ; nutritive value of, 32. Frying-bath, composition of, 2 1 ; testing temperature of, 22. Frying, oil for, 22 ; process of, 21 ; sole, 22. Furniture, in dining-room of i8th century, 143. Galatine, seasoning for, 57. Game, nutritive value of, 30 ; seasoning for, 59. Garlic in soup, 93, Gastronomic Academy, 201 ; art, neglected, 201. Gelatine, alimentary value of, 88. Glasses for table use, 163. Goose, time required for di- ^ gestion of, 33. Grape-juice for flavoring, 59, Grapes in Paris, 36. Gridiron, how to use, 20. Hors d''o£uz'res, warm and cold, 114, 115, 116. Hospitality, Russian, 176 ; Spanish, 196. Indigestion, Brillat - Sava- rin on, 3. Invitations to dinner, 196, 199-, returning invitations, 198. Knives, for table, 162 ; how to use, 158. Laitues au Jus, 50. Lamb breaded with cheese, no. Lemon - juice, in mat ire d'hdtel sauce, 102 ; in tea, 125 ; seasoning for salads, 71. Lettuce, for salads, 67 ; how to cook, 49, Louis XV., art of delicate feasting in time of, 146 ; as cook, 9 ; on art of cook- ing, 8. Magny, admired by George Sand, 5 ; restaurant of, 5. Maitre dWidtel, duties of, 168 ; in Paris restaurant, 212 INDEX. 6 ; office of, 7 ; to make sauce, 102. Matelote of fish, 60, 62. Maxims on dining, 1-12. Mayonnaise^ by whom in- vented, 107; green, 80, 81 ; red, 81 ; stirring, 79 ; to make, 78, 79. Meats, baked, 26 : basting, 27 ; boiled, digestion of, 31 ; composition of, 14 ; digestibility of different, compared, 32, 33 ; extract of, 86 ; how to spit, 26 ; price of, 14, 15 ; not to be roasted in oven, 26 ; raw, insipid, 25 ; roast, diges- tion of, 31 : salt, compared with fresh, 30 ; well-pre- pared, increases health, 16 ; when to cook, 25. Meat-pie, 27. Melons, 114. Menus, decorated, 113; French words in, 114; use of, 112 ; theory of, 88, 113. Milk, time required for di- gestion of, 33. Mouth-bowls, 192, 194, 195. Mutton, nutritive value of, 39 ; time required for di- gestion of, 33. Napkins, decoration of, 162; how to arrange, 190 ; how to use, 161. Nutritive foods, most valu- able, 30, 31. Oven, care of, 26. Oysters, flavoring for ra- gouts, 64 ; pickled, 64 ; time required for digestion of. 33 '► I7tli-century ways of preparing, 63. Paprika, in soup, 95. Paratriptics, 120. Pease, a la Fran^aise, 47, Pepper, best, 71 ; mill for grinding, 71. Petite Mar/nite, 95. Pike, cow^t-bonillon for, 50 ; Izaak Walton's remarks on, 95. Plate, gold and silver, for table, 165. Pork, time required for di- gestion of, 33. Potage, gras et maigre, 85, 87. Potato salad, 76, 77 ; starch in, 37- Pot-aii-fezi, meat in, 23 ; of Henry Fourth, 93 ; skim- ming and straining of, 91. Poule-au-pot, Mile. Fran- 9oise's, 94. Purt'e, defined, 86 ; qualities of a good, 89. Ragouts, flavoring with pick- led oysters, 64 ; Ravigote, in mayo7tnaise, 80 j to make, 80. Reading aloud at table, 162. Relish in food, how pro- duced, 55. Relishes, artificial, 53. Restaurateurs of modern Paris, formerly cooks in noble families, 108 ; of the Old World, 6. Roasting, meat, 18 ; effect on tissue, 24 ; open fire neces- sary for, 27. INDEX. 213 Salad as an aliment, 65 ; basket for draining, 69 ; bowl for, 6g ; chicory, 74 ; cultivating vegetables for, 67 ; definition of, 65 ; French dressing for, 65 ; fruit, 65 ; garnish for let- tuce, 74 ; how to mix, 70 ; how to season, 70 ; Japan- ese, 67 ; lettuce and dress- ing, 68, 72 ; maceJoine, 77, 78 ; nutritive value of, 65 ; of uncooked vegetables and herbs, 67 ; potato, 76, 77 ; spoon and fork for, 70 ; truffles in, 77 ; usefulness of, 66 ; vegetable, 67 ; Vendome, 67 ; when to eat, 73 ; with game, 75. Salt-spoons, 190. Sauces, Bearnaise, 99, 100 ; blanche, 98 ; Ckdteaii- biiand a la maitre d' hoL'l, 102 ; fine materials neces- sary for, 99 ; Gouflfe's, 100 ; green, for cold fish and meats, loi ; Hollandaise, for asparagus, 43 ; 7naitre d' hotel, 102 ; Mile. Fran- 9oise's, 100 ; spoons for stirring, 99. Sauces, basis of good cook- ing, 104 ; classical, 102 ; cost of, 105 ; household, 97, Satccisson in soup, 94, Saufe\ cauliflower, 42, Seasoning, business of the cook, 53 ; for fish, 57 ; for galatine 57 ; perfection of, 54. Soup, care in making,. 89 ; croiZtons for, 93 ; different names for, 84, 85 •, heavy, 84 ; Henry Fourth's, 94 ; how to serve hot, 96 ; Mile, Fran9oise's, 94 ; plates for, 83 ; rules for making, 92, 93, 94 ; stock for, 86, 87 ; thick or clear, 84 ; use of, 83, 87 ; velvet, 92 ; velvet maigre, 82. Spoons, metal, 99 ; salad, 70; warm, for coffee, 184 ; wooden, 99. Starch , change of, in digestion , 38 ; indigestibility of, 37 ; in vegetables, 36, 37. Steak, Chdleaubriand, to cook, 103 ; turning with fork, 21. Stewing, process of, 21. Table, Arthurian Round, shape of, 148 ; behavior at, 181 ; chairs, how to place at, 159; cloth for, 159, decanters for, 164; decora- tions for, 168, 170; dish- es for, 166 ; drinking at, 181 ; etiquette of, 180 ; forks for, 162, 187; French and English, compared, 164; glasses for, 163, 173; horse -shoe dining, 145; how to light, 170; how to use forks at, 158 ; how to use knives at, 158 ; in 1 8th century, 143 ; knives for, 162 ; New York club- house, 148 ; placing guests at, 151, 154; plate, gold and silver, for, 165, 166 ; service a la Francaise, 168 ; service h la Rtisse, 168 ; silver for, 166 ; utensils for, 164, 165 ; waiting at, 155, 169 ; warm plates for, 167. 214 INDEX. Taste, artistic, in eating, 178. Tea, action of, on nerves, 126 ; Audiger's rule for preparing, 121 ; decanting infusion of, 124 ; English, 120 ; hygienic manner of preparing, 123 ; infusion of, 124 ; lemon in, 125 ; loaf-sugar in, 131 ; poison- ous element in, 123 ; pre- pared in small quantities, 124; properties of, 121; sugar and milk in, 125 ; when to be taken, 122. Teapots, 125. Timbales, 116. Toothpicks, 181, 183, 184. Tripe, time required for di- gestion of, 33. Trout, time required for di- gestion of, 33. Turkey, time required for di- gestion of, 33. Veal, time required for di- gestion of, 33. Vegetables, boiling of dried, 37 ; digestion of, 31 ; dry, how cooked, 36 ; for salad, 67 ; in Paris, 35 ; \npotages jfiaigres, 85 ; nutritive value of, 32 ; preserving color of cooked, 38, 39 : rafraichir^ 39 ; season to use, 35 ; to sweeten bitter, 40. Venison, nutritive value of, 30. Vinegar, tarragon, for salad- dressing, 74 ; in Bearnaise, loi ; to prepare, 74. Waiters, at Cafe Anglais, 205; male, 154; Tartar, 205. Wine, champagne, how to serve, 174 ; classical meth- od of serving, 172 ; decant- ers for, 164; for sauce, 60; glasses for, 163 ; in cook- ing, 59 ; kitchen, 60 ; too many kinds of, at table, 173- THE END. SUMMER HOLIDAYS. Travelling Notes in Europe. By THEODORE Child, Author of " Delicate Feasting." pp. vi., 304. Post 8vo, Cloth, Orna- mental, $1 25. A delightful book of notes of European travel. . . . Mr. Child is an art critic, and takes us into the picture-galleries, but we never get any large and painful doses of art informa- tion from this skilful and discriminating guide. There is not a page of his book that approaches to dull reading. — N. Y. Sun. Mr. Child is a shrewd observer and writer of an engag- ing style. He interests the reader with abundant informa- tion, and pleases him by his lively manner in communicating it. — Hartford Courant. Mr. Child is always a brilliant and interesting writer, and his sketches of travels are invariably picturesque and ani- mated in style. — Saturday Evening Gazette, Boston. Mr. Child is a very agreeable travelling companion, and his choice of places for a summer ramble is excellent. . . . The French chapters — on Limoges, Reims, Aix-les-Bains, and especially the voyage on French rivers — are abundant in novelty and odd bits of interest, as well as in beauty of scene and sympathy. — Nation, N. Y. The author gives glimpses of many by-ways which the ordinary tourist never dreams of. He is, moreover, a phi- losopher, something of a poet, a good judge of art and ar- chitecture, and, finally, a cosmopolitan with catholic tastes, but with an eager curiosity which no amount of sight-seeing can ever sate. — San Francisco Chronicle. A very pleasant volume of sketches by an accomplished traveller, v/ho knows how to see and how to describe, and who can give real information without wearisome detail. — Providence Journal. Mr. Child's notes have not only the charm of a practised and graceful pen, but that of unusual originality of theme to recommend them. — New Haven Palladium. Published by HARPER & BROT'iERS, New York. The above work sent by tnail, postage prepaid, to any part of the United States, Canada, or Mexico, on receipt of the price. BOOKS FOR THE HOUSEHOLD. PRACTICAL COOKING AND DINNER GIVING. A Treatise containing Practical Instructions in Cooking ; in the Combination and Serving of Dishes, and in the Fashionable modes of Entertaining at Breakfast, Lunch, and Dinner. By Mary F. Henderson. Illustrated. 1 2mo, Water-proof Cover, $i 50. DIET FOR THE SICK. A Treatise on the Values of Foods, their Application to Special Conditions of Health and Disease, and on the Best Methods of their Preparation. By Mary F. Henderson. Illustrated. i2mo,Cloth,$i 50. MANNERS AND SOCIAL USAGES IN AMERICA. A Book of Etiquette. By Mrs. John Sherwood. New and Enlarged Edition, Revised by the Author. i6mo. Extra Cloth, $1 25. VIRGINIA COOKERY-BOOK. By Mary Stuart Smith. i2mo. Cloth, $1 50 ; 4to, Paper, 25 cents. BEAUTY IN DRESS. ByMissOAKEY. i6mo,Cloth,$ioo. BEAUTY IN THE HOUSEHOLD. By Mrs. T. W. Dewing, Author of "Beauty in Dress." Illustrated. i6mo. Cloth, $1 00. OUNCES OF PREVENTION. By Titus Munson Coan, M.D. i2mo. Paper, 25 cents ; Cloth, 50 cents. THE UNRIVALLED COOK-BOOK AND HOUSE- KEEPER'S GUIDE. By Mrs. Washington. i2mo. Water-proof Cover, $2 00. FAMILY LIVING ON $500 A YEAR. A Daily Ref- erence Book for Young and Inexperienced Housewives. By Juliet Corson. i6mo, Cloth, $1 25. HOUSE -KEEPING MADE EASY. By Christine Terhune Herrick. i6mo. Cloth, $1 00. CRADLE AND NURSERY. By Christine Terhune Herrick. i6mo, Cloth, $1 00. CHOICE COOKERY. By Catherine Owen. i6mo, Cloth, $1 00. Published by HARPER & BROTHERS, New York. 4®" A ny of the ahove works will be sent by mail, postage pre f>aid, to any part of the Utiited States, Canada, or Mexico, on receipt of price. '\ )\r on ■ LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 014 421 288 5 ^