0^ ^^ ^^-^m\o^^ V .* M '* -^ V r ' •°' C\ "oV^ '^O^ Ao^ > . fZ S>i O ' « o 5 . > .0 V* . ./^.i >-^. * A .<-« -I'^iiglaml, i>a!»c1.i(>. VS 152 APPENDIX. 27 lowed, in the mean time, two days of the week for their oiim emfiloyment . This surely looks like making provision for the enjoyment of private property. But when Cushman and Carver were come to London to receive the money and to provide for the voyage, they found the merchants more penurious and severe, than Wes- ton himself, Avhose conduct on this and subsequent occasions was sufficiently selfish. In short, they ultimately refused to advance the money, except upon these material alterations in the articles of compact. — That the whole time of the plant- ers should be employed for the company ; and " That at the end of the seven years.) the capital and profits^ viz. the houses, lands, goods, and chattels be equally divided among the adven- turers."* These terms were not " relished" by the pilgrims, but they finally consented to them. From these facts it is evident that the people at Leyden were cool and prudent in this negotiation ; proposed better terms than they could obtain ; obtained the best that they could ; and endeavoured to provide for the immediate acquisi- tion and enjoyment of private property. But, The destruc- tion of the floor is their poverty. They were obliged to sub-r mit to conditions, which amounted to the selling of them- selves for their passage, or to abandon their enterprize. Thus the community of goods in the Plymouth colony re- sulted not from the enthusiasm of the planters, but from the avarice and narrow policy of the London adventurers. Of consequence, the submission of the pilgrims to these terms, as it was necessary to their noble enterprize, is a further mark of their Christian magnanimity, which has not been sufficiently admired. Community of goods is the term by which this paitnership is stigmatized. If by the phrase is intended the exclusion of all idea of private property, it is wholly erroneous ; it was property undivided, property held jointly ; in the ultimate di- vision of which Bradford, Winslow, AUerton were probably * Sic tiie uliole agreement in Belknap's Atner. Biog;. \o;. IT. )). J81, '2, kr. 28 APPENDIX. to receive a dozen shares each, while others should receive but one. Hence when the colony found difficulty in their connection with European partners, five of the number were sufficiently responsible, with the privilege of the trade of the colony, to liquidate their claim- -n^,.^ .\ 'o V ■A o V \<^ . • • , ^" v-^^-/ \-^-\.*^ v-->^'-/ 'V '•■■ vl - -X- -XN - >.- -"♦' >(^ ♦ V "^J ^.^ - .■ V ^ .^C . ■■•■■ V ,.^ '•■■•- ^-. >' ■'-•-"- ' 0^ .^". "^o ^< 0*0 c^ . <}.^ ,o«<. ^^ j^ s.., %.""'' ./ ..o % "^ .N^ ^6 ^y * • V, -.,,• O,^ O *e.o .0 V, "^ ^V^