* ^ r * * * °* *< * *°« ^ V\ > s • • . *>v /^V" v « „ ** a v "V j lliiilf° ^^ 'wW* a v -^. r > vCv « 'b V 1 jp^ • ^ c.^ »J> o° ♦• o v $> 6 b ^ \/ ^ ^0" ^ .,* r o « » / * * '**• *• ^ d>> *j Popularizing Health Conservation LEE K^RANKEL Sixth Vice-President Metropolitan Life Insurance Company New York A Paper Read before the American Life Convention St. Paul, Minn., August 19, 1913 r Popularizing Health Conservation. In the invitation which Dr. Foxworthy extended to me to prepare a paper to be read before your body on the subject of Health Conservation, he suggested that, if possible, I show the economy of such activity on the part of life insurance com- panies. I take it that the day has passed when it is necessary to demonstrate the desirability of such effort on the part either of life insurance companies or other bodies. The various reports on health conservation, governmental and otherwise, which have been presented in the past few years show clearly that conscious constructive efforts in the direction of human life extension have brought about valuable results. It seems to be well assured that it is possible to increase the length of human life through a better knowledge of the causes which shorten life, particularly pre- ventable diseases, and by the education of the public in correct methods of living. As I have said, the question of the desirability of propaganda along human life extension lines leaves nothing further to be said. Whether action of this kind, however, on the part of life insurance companies is feasible is another question. I confess at the outset that I have little statistical data which proves or disproves this statement. My knowledge of the subject is limited largely to the work that has been done by the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and the few other insurance companies that have entered this field. I am in hopes, however, that the other data which I can present to you to-day will indicate, if not prove, the advantage which accrues both to insurance companies and their policy-holders by concerted effort to educate the latter in human welfare work. The subject should really be considered from three viewpoints. First, the value of education in life conservation for the policy-holders ; second, the value to the agents ; and third, the value to the companies. I shall attempt to discuss these serially. l The Value of Health Conservation to Ordinary Policy-holders. In considering the subject from the standpoint of its value to policy-holders, we must further differentiate between so-called Ordinary policy-holders and Industrial policy-holders. It is questionable to what extent the former need further instruction on the part of the companies with which they are identified. As a rule, the individual who is in a position to take an Ordinary policy of $5,000 and upward is so circumstanced that he is in touch with movements which make for progress along health lines. He is apt to be a man of some education. He reads the newspapers, subscribes to magazines, comes in touch with other individuals who think, study and read, and frequently is identified with organizations and societies which have an active interest in humanitarian and welfare work. For the insurance company to attempt to bring further instruction to men of this class would in many instances be another illustration of "carrying coals to Newcastle." And yet it must be recognized that Ordinary policy-holders to-day are made up of a somewhat different stratum of society than was the case fifteen or twenty years ago. It is not uncommon, in fact quite common, for the artisan and for many individuals who earn their living in the trades to take policies from $1,000 and upward. Our own experience with individuals who take insurance in amounts of $5,000 and upward indicates fairly well that these individuals are in a superior mortality class from those whose insurance policies vary from one to five thousand dollars. I think it is an axiom among medical examiners that the indi- vidual who carries a hundred-thousand-dollar policy is a worse moral hazard and gives a more unfavorable experience than the one who can carry only five thousand dollars of insurance. The group taking policies for about $1,000 has not as large opportunity to obtain useful instruction and information regarding the con- ditions under which they live and the rules and regulations which they should follow to enable them to extend their span of life. I think it is fair to say that for these it may be well worth while for an insurance company to undertake a campaign of instruction either by the dissemination of health literature, by periodical examination of policy-holders or in such manner as may suggest itself to the particular company. One fact, however, which has been well recognized by medical 2 directors and examiners everywhere should be mentioned at this point to illustrate why a health campaign may be desirable for Ordinary policy-holders of all kinds, and irrespective of the amounts of insurance which they carry. It is characteristic of human nature that the possession of wealth, while it gives the holder thereof opportunities for enjoyment, recreation, rest and leisure, in many instances leads to excess. The individual who must stint and save cannot indulge himself. His brother who is more fortunately situated with respect to worldly wealth often puts no bounds to gratifying his appetites. It is the general belief among students of the subject that mortality from diseases of the heart, arteriosclerosis, diabetes, Bright's disease and other degenerative diseases is higher among those who are in a position to live well and comfortably than among those to whom every dollar counts. I think the particular value of medical re-exami- nation of policy-holders will be demonstrated in this group who hold large policies. There is a possibility that when the danger signal has been shown to them through such re-examination they may have the intelligence to adopt a simpler mode of living. Welfare Work for Industrial Policy-holders, With respect to the Industrial policy-holder, the matter presents a somewhat different phase. As a rule, this group is made up of the working men of the community, and includes not only the male adults, but female adults and children of both sexes as well. To a considerable extent the working population is composed of recently arrived immigrants or of their descendants in the first generation. The opportunities which these men and women have had with respect to schooling have been limited. Their knowledge of language, customs and traditions is equally limited. They come frequently from countries in which living conditions have been below standard. Their ideas of cleanliness and health are vague and frequently incorrect. To what extent this element is present in the population is shown by the fact that much of the literature which the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company distributes to its Industrial policy-holders must be translated into ten different languages in order to be of service. You will see from what I have said that there is a distinct field of opportunity for Industrial insurance companies to educate their policy-holders along health lines. Such education would follow quite a number of directions. I need not recall to you 3 gentlemen, who are probably conversant with the subject, the fact that the Industrial mortality is considerably higher than that of the American Experience Table. At some ages, in fact, it is 150 per cent, of the Ordinary mortality. Nor can we say that this excessive mortality is due to the fact that medical inspection only is made at the time the policy is issued. The experience of certain European insurance companies who issue Industrial policies with and without examination has demonstrated, odd as it may seem, that individuals who insure without medical examination or inspection, and whose policies come into full benefit only after they are one or two years old, have a more favorable mortality than policy-holders of the same group who have passed a medical examination and as a result have immediately had their policies in full benefit. This shows quite clearly that there is a distinct selection against the company on the part of individuals who are probably sub-standard lives but whose condition is not revealed by the medical examinations which are made. The causes of the higher mortality in the Industrial group must be looked for in their environment. I believe that such excessive mortality is primarily traceable to occupation. Long hours of work, hazardous industries, overstrain, combined with insufficient recreation and amusement, unquestionably sap the vitality of men and make them die earlier than they should. The German statistics of accidents show these facts very clearly. Generally speaking, it may be said that there are more accidents occurring at the end of the week than at the beginning or during the week. In other words, the effects of continuous labor and the consequent and subsequent wear and tear, both on the muscular and nervous system, develop a lassitude which makes for care- lessness and resulting accidents. Other causes which may be mentioned as producing higher mortality are housing conditions, inadequate wages, insufficient nourishment, overcrowding both in homes and in factories. All these combined make a determining factor bringing about higher mortality in the Industrial group. If we study the situation by age periods, this fact is even more pronounced. The mortality which our Company experiences in its Industrial department from tuberculosis (all forms) is 16.37 per cent, of all deaths. On the other hand, at the age period 20-24 the mortality is 43.61 per cent, of the total deaths. Similar figures are brought out at the various ages by the study of 4 other causes of death, particularly those directly traceable to occupation. Whether, therefore, the present mortality among policy- holders is due to the individual's own recklessness and extravagant methods of living, as is instanced by many Ordinary policy- holders, or whether he is a creature of his environment, as is the case with a large bulk of Industrial policy-holders, the fact remains that both of them need enlightenment and instruction. I take it to be the proper sphere of an insurance company to undertake this education. Its immediate value for the life insurance com- pany is reduction in mortality, which, in the last analysis, means a reduction of premiums or an increased amount of insurance for existing premiums. The studies which the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company has made from time to time of its Industrial mortality experience have demonstrated a constant improvement. As a result, the Company has twice, since 1907, increased the amount of benefits to its Industrial policy-holders. Similarly, the large bonuses which it has been distributing to its policy-holders annually for a number of years have been possible partly through the more favorable mortality in the Industrial group. This, I should say, has been the result of the general improvement in health con- ditions. Factory legislation, tenement house legislation, the raising of standards of living have all aided. We are of the impression that we are justified in supplementing these general movements for the improvement of health conditions by the campaign which we have had in effect now for some years, directed, however, exclusively to our Industrial policy-holders. Results Accomplished by the Metropolitan. You will be desirous of knowing what results have been accom- plished. As I have said at the outset, there is no statistical data at hand to indicate whether there has been any financial economy in the movement. I doubt, in fact, whether our mortality statistics within the next ten years will show the results of such a campaign. It is questionable whether they will ever be able to show any marked change as a result of our activities. Mor- tality, as you know, is affected by many conditions, over most of which we have no control. Whereas mortality in certain localities may show improvement, floods, epidemics and other adverse influence may be at work in other localities to keep the 5 general death rate about the same. It may be said here that at no time has the Company expected its welfare work among policy-holders to give a return measurable in dollars and cents. It has assumed the financial burden in the belief that its relation to its Industrial policy-holders was something more than a con- tractual one. The Industrial insurance agent who visits his policy-holders weekly is more than a canvasser. Insurance to the average working man has been a matter of indifference, and frequently of contempt or fear. The Industrial insurance agent, for this reason, has possibly even more of a mission as an educator in providence and forethought than falls to the lot of the Ordinary agent. Similarly, we feel that as trustees of the hard-earned savings of working men it is our business as an insurance company not merely to pay death claims as they arise, but to attempt to put off the payment period as long as possible. This latter statement may sound mercenary; as a matter of fact it is just the opposite. Few claims that have ever been paid to the families of working men have ever compensated them for the loss of the wage-earners and of their wages. If we can assist in prolonging the period of efficiency for the average working man. so that his family benefits thereby, we believe we are properly fulfilling our function as an insurance company for the masses of the popu- lation. If we can, as I say, prove nothing at the present time with respect to the economic value of welfare work, it is, however, proven that such work is distinctly appreciated by policy-holders. One of the objections to life insurance as prosecuted by life insur- ance companies is due to its inherent limitations and inability to bring policy-holder and company into closer contact. In this respect, as compared with the large fraternal orders, it has signally failed. To the average policy-holder the average insurance company is looked upon generally with a rather distinct belief in its solvency and ability to meet death claims, and at the same time with an air of scepticism as to its motives and willingness to give him a much-needed commodity at the lowest cost to him- self. The officers of an insurance company ordinarily are unknown to policy-holders excepting in the printed pages of annual reports. Even the agent, the intermediary of the company (excepting in Industrial insurance) , is known to the policy-holder mainly at the time when the application is signed or the claim is paid. Most frequently the agent represents to the policy-holder an individual 6 whom he is glad to get rid of for fear that he may be induced, against his desire or belief, to take out additional insurance. Our welfare work among Industrial policy-holders is putting a new phase to this relation between policy-holders and company. We find them distinctly appreciative of the efforts which we are making in their behalf. It is not uncommon for them to laud the Company and to praise its activities. We believe that in the long run we shall develop a group of policy-holders more satisfied to be policy-holders than they ever were. We believe that continued effort along welfare lines will make policy-holders realize more thoroughly than they ever did that even corporations have souls. It is our opinion, gained from our experience, that our policy- holders may be educated along the lines we have planned for them, and that they are willing as policy-holders to act concertedly for their common good. We have mentioned in other places the attempt which we made in 191 1 to secure a Federal department of health. It was a comparatively simple matter to bring this desire on our part to the notice of our Industrial policy-holders, and to show them, through literature specially prepared for the purpose , how desirable it was for their personal good to advocate such a department. As a result, thousands of our policy-holders communicated their wishes to their respective Congressmen, and it is admitted that this campaign materially forwarded the possibilities of national legislation directed toward the establish- ment of either a Federal department or bureau of health. Outings for Policy-holders. During the present summer we have endeavored to extend this sense of relationship between policy-holders and agents in a rather novel manner. Circular letters were sent to our super- intendents advising them that if they could arrange outings for policy-holders the Company was prepared to contribute a portion of the expense. We were led to this action by the splendid results obtained by such an outing in the city of St. Louis last year. In one district in that city the superintendent and his agents gave a picnic at which it was estimated 40,000 policy-holders were present. In fact, so great was the crowd that the street car system of St. Louis on that day was at its wit's end to meet the demands made upon it. Prizes of various kinds were offered; policy-holders indulged in a variety of sports and were given free admission to the various amusements in the amusement park in which the picnic was held. Ever since last summer the policy- holders in this district have been making inquiries at the district office to learn whether another picnic would be given to them this year. Plans have just been completed to hold another picnic in St. Louis on August 15th. A number of picnics of this kind have been given by superin- tendents in other cities this summer with most excellent results. Not only have policy-holders participated in these outings, but the motive which actuated the Company in giving them has won the commendations of city officials, including mayors and health officers, who have attended the same and made addresses. All of which simply proves what I have attempted to demonstrate, namely, that the social side of life insurance is one that may not be ignored and one which will bear definite fruits. I think you will agree with me that the policy-holders who have attended these picnics feel a sense of obligation to the Company; that they realize the efforts which the Company is putting forth in their behalf; that the tendency to lapsation on their part is distinctly minimized, and that the publicity that these policy-holders give to this form of welfare work is distinctly beneficial both to them and to the Company. If I have dwelt on this phase of the subject somewhat at length it is because I believe in its essential merit. When work of this kind is attempted, the relation between the policy-holder and the Company is no longer an abstract but a concrete one. The fact that the policy-holder speaks of the Company as "my Company" or as "our Company" shows the revulsion in feeling which has taken place. The possibilities of work along these lines are many. We have had under careful consideration for some time the question of bringing policy-holders together at periodical intervals and giving them lectures on health subjects and on other subjects of vital interest to them. The only diffi- culty in the way to date is the expense. Such a plan would involve the employment of competent lecturers, the rent of halls and other expense which, as we see it now, is not feasible. Purely on experimental lines, we have at various times arranged meetings at our district offices where mothers have been instructed by our nurses regarding the care of their children. The success of this experiment leads us to believe that it is well worthy of further extension. The Health and Happiness League. A little over a year ago, in our effort to get into closer personal touch with children who are policy-holders in the Company, we organized the Health and Happiness League. Children who desired to join this League were required to sign a pledge in which they promised to do certain definite things for the improvement of their bodily health and to co-operate with the Company in its welfare work. The members of this League receive a League button and a membership certificate. Practically without effort on our part, approximately one hundred thousand children are enrolled as members of the League. We are now engaged in devising plans to make the League a practical body of efficient workers for the betterment and improvement of health conditions. It is difficult to determine the economic value to the insurance company of welfare work such as has been indicated above; it is even more difficult to determine the value of an educational campaign carried on through the distribution of pamphlets, leaflets, etc. There is no means of checking up such a campaign, or at least none the cost of which would not be prohibitive. A considerable part of our welfare campaign has consisted of the distribution to our Industrial policy-holders of pamphlets on tuberculosis, the care of the child, teeth, tonsils and adenoids, and a more recent one on the health of the worker. We have now in preparation a pamphlet on first aid in the home, and a series of leaflets on preventable diseases such as smallpox, diphtheria, scarlet fever, etc. It is important, in connection with literature of this kind, that it should be written in a fashion that the average working man will read and understand. Unless it is put in an attractive form he will probably consign it, unread, to his waste- basket or garbage-pail. Health Literature. We have every reason to believe, however, that the literature which we distribute is read and that it has a distinct effect. Very recently a committee of midwives, with their counsel, requested an interview. This was granted to them. It appeared that they took exception to a statement contained in our pamphlet "The Child" in which the prospective mother was advised to have a doctor or to go to the hospital in preference to a midwife. The committee contended that this statement was ruining their busi- ness, since whenever they entered the homes of our policy-holders they were shown a copy of the booklet "The Child," and their attention directed to the statement respecting midwives. We feel that when policy-holders are sufficiently acquainted with the contents of our booklets to take an attitude of the kind described, such literature has a very distinct value. Other instances of the same kind could readily be cited. I need only mention the case of a mother who wrote to us that she had dis- charged her midwife because the latter had not carried out the instructions in our booklet with respect to the care of a baby's eyes. A father writes us that, prior to the receipt of our booklet "Teeth, Tonsils and Adenoids," it had never entered his mind to have his boy examined. When he did, he discovered that the boy had adenoids, which thereupon were removed. At various county fairs throughout the United States and Canada where the Company has exhibited its welfare work and distributed its literature, we have had the superintendents carefully watch to ascertain whether such literature was found lying around the fair grounds. It has been very gratifying to us to be informed that almost invariably the literature which we distributed was taken away by the visitors to these fairs. In fact, as a result of this distribution we have constant inquiries from the neighbors of individuals who have received our pamphlets requesting to be furnished with copies. The Visiting Nurse Service. The most important phase of our welfare work among policy- holders has been our visiting nurse service. Here, too, again, I must admit that we have no statistics which indicate whether this service, given voluntarily to policy-holders, has been instru- mental in materially reducing the mortality. On the other hand, we have instance after instance of individuals who have written to us of their belief that their lives have been saved by the service of the nurse; and nurses have reported instances of the saving of life. In our opinion, the value of this particular service, which to-day has been extended to practically all of our Industrial policy-holders, lies primarily in the realization on the part of the policy-holder that we are attempting to render him a service. He grasps the salient fact in the suggestion which we make to him in concrete form through the instrumentality of the nurse or in the literature which we hand to him through our agents, that our efforts are directed primarily for his benefit and his 10 improvement. In this way we secure his co-operation. In this way a bond of friendship is established between the Company and its policy-holders — a bond which we hope will be lasting and per- manent, if any effort on our part can make it so. Value of Conservation Campaign to Agents. Here, too, I can speak only from our own experience. This, I may say, has been not only distinctly favorable, but highly illuminating. We believe it no exaggeration to say that the co-operation which our agents have given us in our human life extension campaign has put them on a distinctly higher and better plane. The conscientious insurance agent's work is not exclusively to increase business. This is particularly true of the Industrial insurance agent who, in addition to his duties as canvasser, is required to act as collector of small weekly premiums. His work brings him constantly in contact with the working population. The work is hard and difficult, frequently trying and exasperating. The difficulties which the Industrial agent encounters are in many respects similar to those of all insurance agents. At one moment they reach the heights of delirious expectation, only to be cast down the next moment into the depth of disillusionment. Since the work of the Ordinary agent is on a commission basis, his income is an uncertain factor, and for this reason the pecuniary side of this work looms up in his horizon. I believe that our agents, as a result of their interest and activity in our welfare campaign, have unconsciously been made to realize the dignified character of the work in which they are engaged, even more so than formerly. They have awakened to the fact that their labors are fundamentally altruistic. Life insurance is a profession, the advocates of which, aside from the fact that they earn their living therein, are educators in self-abnegation and self-sacrifice. The teachings of the doctrine of thrift, of provision for protection against important contingencies of life, are educational activities which make the work of the agent vie with that of the school teacher or the college professor. This in itself gives dignity to the work our insurance agents undertake. The activities we have assigned to them in our welfare campaign have added materially to the consciousness of our agents of the important part they play in the development of communal and civic activities for the betterment of their fellow citizens. Since we have undertaken this work, many of our agents and superin- 11 tendents have of their own initiative brought schemes for the improvement of existing conditions to the notice of officials in the cities in which they live. Only recently one of our agents wrote to us for full information regarding the establishment of free dispensaries. There was none in his city and he had interested the mayor and other officials in organizing one. We find that as a result of this work the relationship of agent to policy-holder is more that of a friend and adviser than one of cold formal business. The fact that it is the agent who dis- tributes health literature and explains the contents to his clientele gives him at once a standing in the household which we believe could not readily be gained by any other means. Incidentally, the conscientious agent, in order to fully carry out the ideas which prompt the Company to institute welfare work, must of necessity come in contact with representative individuals of his community engaged in similar social enterprises. We recently sent out a circular to our superintendents inviting them to advise us of the social and civic activities with which they were connected. The returns have been quite surprising and gratifying. Many of our superintendents are members of boards of trades and chambers of commerce in their respective cities; a number of them are identified with charitable and philanthropic institutions. Others are officers of or are on committees of civic bodies. Let me give you an illustration of the value of this work to the agent and to the superintendent. In the early spring we sent circulars to all our superintendents calling their attention to the house-cleaning campaign which had been instituted and organized by the health department of the city of New York. We suggested the desirability of a similar campaign in their own cities, and advised them to take the matter up either with the mayor or with the health officers. We have still to hear of an instance in which interviews were refused to our representative, or where the city officials were not heartily in sympathy with the attempt of the superintendent, under our instructions, to establish ideal conditions of cleanliness through a city-cleaning campaign. In a number of instances superintendents, at the request of their city officials, wrote to the Home Office for a description of the plan in use in New York, and for copies of the literature which we had distributed to our policy-holders asking them to co-operate with the health officials of the city to insure an efficient and effective house-cleaning campaign. 12 A Better Agency Force. You will note that throughout this paper I have endeavored to give you practical illustrations of the results which we have thus far accomplished. The conclusions which I have drawn are based upon the actual results obtained; the illustrations which have been given could be multiplied and multiplied. Summed up, we have no doubt that as a result of our campaign we have a better agency force than formerly. This does not necessarily mean better men. Our standard for agents has been high for years. It does mean, however, that we have a field force to-day equipped to handle life insurance as a social proposition rather than as a purely sordid business enterprise. The responsibility which the men feel toward the Company has grown and been accentuated. The work which they are able to do through our welfare campaign gives them a distinct status and standing in their communities. In what is distinctly a social era they are able to play their part as men and insurance agents. The educational value to the agents through a health conservation campaign means loyalty and pride in the Company, not to speak of the possibilities of increasing and bettering business. One illustration I can cite with respect to the latter. We are in daily receipt of applications from non-policy-holders throughout the United States and Canada asking for copies of our publications. These are always forwarded by us through the superintendent or agent. It is surprising to note the large number of instances in which the literature has been instrumental in obtaining new friends and policy-holders for the Company. Lastly, and probably of greatest importance with respect to the agent, is the realization on his part that he can make work of this kind his life work. He realizes the undesira- bility of constant change in occupation. The finaling of agents' accounts is becoming less and less, and we have with us to-day a body of men whose interests are the Company's interests, and the Company's interests only. For such a result alone, if it ac- complished nothing else, a welfare campaign would have proved its economic value. I can only take a word here to speak of the welfare campaign which we are carrying on for our employees, including our field staff. This has been developed in varying directions, and to-day has a wide application. We hope within the next few months to open our sanatorium for tuberculous employees at Mount Mc- Gregor, New York. This is the first attempt on the part of an 13 insurance company to make institutional provision for the care of its agents afflicted with tuberculosis. Vai.uk to the Company. Finally, the value of welfare work or conservation work, which- ever one may call it, to the insurance companies remains to be considered. It would seem as if this did not require any further elaboration in view of what has been said of the value of such work to the policy-holders and to agents. After all, an insurance company is something of an intangible thing. Primarily, it is the policy-holders who are the company. It is their funds which are accumulated; it is for their benefit and protection that the company exists. Nevertheless, there is a company viewpoint which may not be ignored; and when I speak of company in this sense, I speak of the officers who direct it. Welfare work from the standpoint of the officers spells reputation. By this I do not mean notoriety. Each and all of us, whatever our employment, desire to have a certain satisfaction from the work in which we are engaged — to receive a certain return for our labors. To some, the purely financial reward is sufficient; to others, the recognition on the part of their fellow men of the motives which inspire their work is all-compelling and all-sufficient. No insurance company's officials can long maintain its standing to whom its reputation is not as the breath in their nostrils. Life insurance companies may have their assets; the surplus may be large, the reserve fund ample to protect policy-holders. These, after all, are not matters of congratulation so much as they are requirements of law. If they did not exist the officers would be held accountable. It is the things which the company does over and above its legal requirements which place it in a category to receive consideration from thoughtful men and women. Any attempt on the part of an insurance company to show the community its highly laudable desire to consider policy-holders not as so many units who pay premiums, but as men and women whose physical welfare should be its concern, will give to the company a reputation for honest and fair dealing to which it would be justly entitled. In the past it has been the tendency of the public, the press and legislatures to deprecate the work done by insurance companies rather than to extol it. Even to-day it is not uncommon for a news- paper, in commenting upon the good work which an insurance com- pany may have done, to omit the name of the company for fear 14 that undue advertising and publicity maybe given to the company. On the other hand, it is equally not uncommon, and at the same time regrettable, that many newspapers do not hesitate to give the widest publicity to an insurance company if in the opinion of its editors it has been guilty of the least infraction of the law or has not done everything that the policy-holder might expect. From the purely utilitarian standpoint, welfare work among policy-holders has a distinct public value. When I speak of publicity, I refer to it in its highest sense. Charitable and philanthropic organizations, welfare movements of all kinds, do not hesitate to-day to advertise their activities in every possible way. Only a few days ago at a seashore hotel, fans were distributed at all the tables on which the summer work of one of our large New York charities was given in detail. Our newspapers from day to day show similar advertisement of other welfare and charitable movements. Prob- ably all of us frequently receive letters requesting our support and contributions for agencies of all kinds engaged in social uplift. Their success in securing support depends upon their ability to present to the public the results which they have obtained. Their standing in the community is based altogether upon the success with which they conduct their work. Since the life insurance companies to-day, in a certain sense, are great social institutions, it is only fitting that they too shall keep the public advised and acquainted with the attempts which are being made to improve the conditions of their policy-holders. It is significant to note that where this is done and where it is realized that this form of care for policy-holders is inspired by proper motives, the legitimate newspaper press of the country is prepared to give due credit. The life insurance companies of to-day are engaged in an honest business ; the competition between them is based on a gentleman's agreement. All are interested to the best of their ability in inculcating the principles of insurance among their constituents so that they may guard themselves against the hazards of life. The insurance companies equally with other social associations are entitled to the proper recog- nition of their services to the community by the press, the public and the legislatures. The Need of the Future. If it were necessary to cite another utilitarian reason for welfare work by insurance companies, the marked changes in 15 insurance thought in the past few years could be referred to. Insurance companies must watch closely the signs of the times. Even in the United States to-day one hears the advocates of State insurance and sees laws enacted authorizing such experiments. In Italy, life insurance has been taken entirely out of the hands of private corporations and been made a state monopoly. The threadbare discussion as to the need of an agency force constantly comes to the front. We constantly hear the opinion of tyros voiced that under state insurance a Utopian scheme can be developed in which the agent would no longer be necessary. It would seem that the results in England, in Belgium, in Wisconsin, and most recently the failure of the large insurance society in Diisseldorf, Germany, which attempted to do business largely without agents, would have given sufficient testimony as to the impracticability of such ventures. Nevertheless, the private insurance company is at the bar. Whether we are to have a continuance of private voluntary insurance or the introduction of compulsory insurance will, to my mind, depend entirely upon the way in which the private insurance companies conduct themselves and realize their responsibility and obligations to their policy-holders. The question may well be asked whether the smaller insurance companies with comparatively limited financial resources can undertake life extension work of the character indicated in this paper. I am of the impression that they can. It may be that their activities would necessarily be limited in proportion to their financial ability. If it is of interest to this meeting, I may say that I understand plans are on foot in the East to effect an organization which will enable all insurance companies to participate in this work of health conservation without the neces- sity of special machinery for each company. It is planned to organize an independent central organization; a business corpora- tion, as I understand it, whose purpose is to do for all companies, through a centralized system, what is at present being done by a number of individual companies. I am not at liberty at present to go into particulars. The project is not one that has been initiated by an insurance company. It is only because its pro- moters have consulted me that I happen to know about it. Whether such a centralized body, independent of all insurance companies, will be the medium through which the smaller com- panies can undertake welfare work or not I am not prepared to say. I mention the fact here simply to show that the question 16 of human life extension is in the foreground, and that evidently- reputable business men consider the subject of sufficient impor- tance to attempt to organize a health conservation movement on a purely business basis. I have detained you here overlong and doubtless wearied you. I am in hopes, however, that when you have left this meeting and are refreshed you will on second sober thought realize the value of the arguments which I have presented. No insurance company to-day can afford to ignore the possibilities that lie in welfare work for policy-holders. I have cited distinct utili- tarian and good business reasons why it is advisable for insurance companies to enter this field. The greatest reason, however, and one which overshadows all the others, is the responsibility which insurance managers owe to their policy-holders. The funds which insurance companies hold belong in the last analysis to their policy-holders. The latter have invested these in the main in a spirit of unselfishness and frequently of self-sacrifice. They are using the machinery of the company to make provision for themselves and their families against life's risks and accidents. The modern attitude of an insurance company toward the policy- holders is primarily one of stewardship. It is incumbent upon every company to live up to this sense of stewardship; to hold such as a sacred trust, and to do everything that lies in its power to improve and better the living conditions of its policy-holders. 17 ^132 78 56/ N500 A V ^ J> o«VJ9^\K* aV ">v 9^ v tVw£»> ^ aP - * • * ^ Ap ^'^* ^ &• -^ c^ ^ccOfA° '^ ■^ > ^MMS * 4 0. ' ;.. ^ ^ .VdBw*. **. ^ A V ^ A ^ ^, 'O . » * *o * y * °. ^ ^ ?♦ ^ -^ A »?^ 4 0. 'of • 1 1 4^ **V» -1 cu *°^ o> *^ iP v., ' ^ 4°*. " *• * 4^> ^0^ t> H ° >v A 41 *°^ 4 P^ 7> y