E .Ml ^ i ' i Class ^ isC Book i^un / /_ f-f STATES M A N--.E X T R A . .{7 ^- TO THE MEMBERS OF THE GET^RAL ASSEMBLY OF ILLINOIS. Gentle3iex: The letters with whicli'l have been honored by several ____ of you, tendering me support for the Senate of the United States, and 'r Cl letters from prominent citizens who are not members, have induced me to commAuiicate to you this address, with the assurance that I am not insensible to the high dnties which nuist devolve upon whomsoever you may select for that station, and that my services are at the will of the Legislature. This was substantially made known upon the request of some of the gentlemen who composed the Democratic Convention which assembled last winter at Springfield. I have been so long before the public, and have written and spoken so much in defence of the Democratic creed, which, in my judgment, upholds the great principles of popular liberty, that I need say but little as to the course I should pursue if elected. I am one of the authors of the addresses and resolutions as published by conventions of our Democratic fellow-citizens in 1827 and 1S2S, and tlie sole author of the addresses of 1831 and 1839. I mention this, as they contain the creed by which my conduct has been governed, and which I have uniformly sustained, and shall sustain, whether in or out of office. I refer to these papers, and especially the last, as being more full, and as containing a more enlarged exposition of my views upon several sub- jects ; among which are — 1st. That the Constitution has not conferred upon Congress the power to charter a Bank of the United States; and also of the dangers to be apprehended from that institution, or any moneyed institution, with powers and privileges analogoiis to it. 2d. My opinion upon the propriety and constitutionality of separating the fiscal affairs of the Government from all banks and banking institu- tions, and placing them in the hands of individuals, made personally and criminally responsible to the laws. 3d. A brief exposition of my opinions upon one branch of a subject so peculiarly interesting to our State and people, to wit, the public domain. The first and second subjects are so fully discussed in the address alluded to, that I need add nothing to what was then said. The opinions then expressed, are still entertained, and I will endeavor to send you a copy of that address. \A\^^ The third subject relates to the public domain ; the oiucstions connected widi which have been, for many years, among the most important to the whole people of the new States. Nor has time diminished this import- ance. For the purpose of testing the utility of the propositions which have been submitted for the disposition of the public lands, it may be well to state the substance of several of them. As far back as 1821, the Assembly of Maryland adopted the proposition submitted by Mr. Maxcy. This claimed that the public lands should be donated to the old States for the purposes of education, in certain pro- portions, and upon certain principles therein recommended. Some of the other States luiited in resolutions to Congress approving this proposi- tion. It, however, did not find sufficient favor; and, so far as a cession of the land was concerned, was abandoned. In 1S32, and just upon the eve of the final extinguishment of the ])ublic debt, Mr. Clay's land bill was introduced into Congress. This bill aban- doned the idea of a direct claim to the land, but claimed the money to be derived from the sales, leaving Congress to go on and dispose of the same under the existing system. The proposition was designed to acquire strength to })ass it, by a principle of combination, founded exclusively upon money. It was to give 12.^- per cent, to certain new States, making no provision whatever for the Territories, and then dividing the whole proceeds of the public lands among the then twenty-four States, according to their respective federal representative population, as ascertained by the census of 1S30. This scheme, you will perceive, which confined the distribution to the census of that year, would have given to the States east of the Alleganies nearly the whole amount of money to be derived from the public lands. New York, Pennsylvania, and Virginia, with their immense population, would have been enriched ; while the new States, with their small population, (under the census of 1S30,) wotild have derived scarcely any benefit from it. But there was another objection : the old States had received the benefit of the unappropriated lands within their limits, while the nev/ States had received no such benefit. In September, 1833, a public meeting was held at Carlyle to protest against the objectionable provisions of Clay's land bill. I was at that meeting, and delivered an address, which was printed at the time. T beg leave to quote some passages from it : " The annual net proceeds of the sales of public lands, said Mr. Mc- Roberts, is esdmated at about three millions — say $2,400,000 over and above the 121 per cent. This sum, with few deductions, is proposed to be divided among the 24 States. The number of members of Congress, when the bill passed, was 261. Each vote was, therefore, worth to the State of the member who gave it, about $9,175. This was the dividend to each, liad every member voted for its passngc. Was not here a most controlling temptation ? The precious metals were offered to be poured out in quantities sufficient to pave the streets of Washington, and in an eternal stream from the west to the east, if its advocates had votes enough at roll-call to pass it. " Sir, is this just — is this constitutional — to drain and impoverish one portion of the republic to enrich another? The States having by far the greater Federal representative population are east of the mountains, and they would receive the revenue. Thirty years hence the tables will be turned. The west will have the greatest population. Do you believe, sir, tliat the party Avho now advocate this agrarian scheme would then support it? No, sir, never. They are aware of our growth, and they intend to sweep the new States of the public lands, before we have suf- ficient power to protect ourselves. " The roads and canals east of the mountains to be constructed by the proceeds of these lands may remain monuments to future time ; and well may those who come after us, and in the plenitude of our gigantic popu- lation, say, ' We too should have had means to construct public improve- ments, but that, in the infancy of our population, our sister States, the elder heirs, seized upon our inheritance and wrested it from us.' " But what becomes of the Territories, when the whole proceeds of the public lands, ' wherever situated,^ are to be divided among the 24 States ? No inconsiderable portion of the moneys will be drawn from Michigan, Arkansas, and Florida, and the other Territories. They are to receive no part of the 12^- per cent. The Territories contain meri- torious citizens, and some of the finest soil. They are newly populated countries, and need roads and canals more than some of the favored 24 States ; yet the citizens of the Territories, who pay a full share under the impost system, are to be stripped of every advantage of the lands. They will be entitled to admission into the Union at some day, ' on an equal footing with the original States ;' but before that day arrives, the bill, in its charity for the people of the 24 States, may have swept the Territories, and they find themselves deprived of the common benefits allotted to the other citizens of the American Government. Is this just ? is this patriotic ? is an act like this worthy to be enrolled in the catalogue of acts of the American Congress? " Will not the practical tendency of the proposed scheme lead to a sub- version of the equality and political independence of the States, and be the very entering wedge to consolidation ? " That sectional jealousies will find a hot-bed to stimulate their growth, in the unequal operations of the proposed system, can hardly admit of doubt. The basis of distribution, founded upon ' federal representative population,' will give to the States per annum about the sums hereafter stated, upon the hypothesis that !^2,400,000 is to be distributed. The operations of the proposed scheme can be more readily seen in the fol- lowing view of the subject. There are but seven States in which the public lands are situated — Missouri, Illinois, Indiana, Alabama, Missis- sippi, Louisiana, and Ohio ; in the latter of which the lands are mostly disposed of The Atlantic States, which contain no public lands except what is owned by them individually, v/ith Ohio and Kentucky, would receive about 82,180,000 ; while Missouri, Illinois, Indiana, Alabaiua, Mississippi, and Louisiana, which, with the Territories, contain most ol the public lands, and therefore would furnish the money, would receive about $220,000. These States and the Territories are thus to furnish ^2,400,000 per annum, mrder the operations of the proposed land system. They claim an equal participancy in the objects of the Union. They are in need of means to erect public improvements ; yet the new States and Territories are called upon to raise $2,180,000 per annum for the elder members of the Confederacy. That is, $220,000 to be put into their own treasuries, with the per cent, before mentioned, and $2,180,000 to pass into the treasuries of States that, in strict justice, had no right to a cent of it. It is not so much the price at which the lands are held — it ic the withdrawal of the capital that impoverishes the country. " Let me ask what country on earth can withstand the operations of a scheme as deleterious as the proposed land system cannot fail to be? Is it just to gratify an avarice, whose spirits feed upon ill-gotten spoils, and whose sympathies seem most awakened when the powers of the Federal Government can be successfully used to impoverish one section of the Union to enrich and build up another ? The States and Territories con- taining the public lands have but few manufactories. The wants of tlieir citizens are supplied, in this respect, from abroad. They are consumers, not manufacturers ; and have thus paid more than tlieir share into the National Treasury, in the way of imposts. If the bill pass, the tariff will be increased to make up the deficiency in the revenue, and the miserable pittance we would receive, would be more than taken from our people by the increase of duties. We should, therefore, be losers in every possible view of the subject. The land system operates as a continual drain of the circulating medium of the country. The appropriations to national objects in the west, by which a return of the money might be produced, have been made in a sparing, not to say parsimonious, spirit. The new scheme for dividing the proceeds of the lands will cut off all expectation of a reduction of price ; of further pre-emptions for the protection of actual settlers ; and of (what is most desired by us) a final surrender of the lands. " Sir, no one can doubt that if the bill referred to pass, the privations the people have hitherto experienced will be forgotten, amid the blighting curses Avhich the detestable system cannot fliil to bring upon the country. A constitution that does not contain inhibitions to the passage of a law so partial and unjust, would be unworthy to be cherished by freemen. " Sir, if this scheme of dividing out the national territory is once car- ried in Congress, who is there, let me ask, that can foresee what will become of it, or where it will end? What power, except the power of Omnipotence, will ever be able to check and uproot a system founded upon combination among majorities, and cemented, either present or in expect- ancy, with hundreds of millions of the precious metals? Does any man believe that hgaments like these ever can be broken ; or that the system, if once established, will be eternal, and totally change the character of the Government? All the vigilance which the passion for money can excite — all the secret wires which self-interest can stimulate — are combined to rivet this odious system upon the western States. But although com- binations have carried the bill in Congress ; although expectants have posted the amount of their dividends, and are looking, with eagerness, for the coming messenger ; the citizens of the new Slates are not without a hope — a hope that the scheme will be defeated — a hope that rises up be- fore us like another bright bow of promise. " One veto has upheld the Constitution, b^r preventing the squandering of miihons upon local, and some of thcni useless, objects. Another veto, in strict iidelity to the Constitution, has crippled an aristocracy, and the god they worshipped, the Bank of the United States." These extracts show my opinion t/ioi and 7iow upon that subject. I took the ground that the great point to be attained with us was, a surren- der of the remaining; lands to the States in which theij vere situated; and that, to accomplish this, the unequal distribution system must be defeated. The terms of surrender would, of course, have to be matter of compro- mise ; but that, so soon as the public debt was paid (this being the primary object for which the lands were originally ceded to Congress) we should look to this surrender as an act of common justice. The reasons are so unanswerable in favor of this measure, that we have but to discuss its merits, and press it upon the consideration of our coun- trymen, to enlist the upright and the just in support of it everywhere. Similar objections existed twelve years ago to granting pre-emptions for the protection of actual settlers, that now exist to a surrender, upon equi- table terms, of the remaining lands to the States in which they lie. But the new States, through their Legislatures, pressed the subject ; and more especially Illinois, Missouri, and Alabama. The arguments that were presented induced the men of the land, as well as politicians, to examine the question ; and the consequence was, its triumphant success. In 1829 the question was brought before the Senate of Illinois. That body took a decided stand in favor of a change in the then existing land system, urging various measures to encourage the settlement of the land, and to produce its surrender to the States in which it was situated. The report and memorial imbodying these views, as made and printed at the time, and adopted by the Senate, were drawn by me ; and I therefore beg leave to refer to them as showing the participancy I had, at that early period, in presenting the questions to Congress and the country. The report would seem, from the journal, to have been made by another mem- ber. He, however, is not the author of it ; and I now state the fact that the report was my own, and contains my views, as found in the Senate journal of January 1S29. The House concurred in the memorial, and it will appear, from the sub- sequent proceedings of Congress, ( Public Land Documents, volume 4 and volume 5, page 213,) that the memorials from Illinois, Missouri, and Alabama, had no small agency in producing the pre-emption law of May 29, 1830. This was the foundation of all the pre-emption laws subse- quent to that period ; for those that have passed since, are but the revival of the act of 1830, with some unimportant modifications. Complaints, it is true, have been made against pre-emption laws ; but they were the complaints of the speculator. No laws have ever conferred as much per- 6 manent good upon the needy, or protected as many homes and firesides, as those granting pre-emptions to actual settlers. I claim no merit for the humble part which it was my lot to take in this matter. The people were then alive to the question ; and in the discharge of a high duty as a member of the Senate, I prepared that report and me- morial, as arguments to contribute in producing a change of the land system. 1 advert to this now, to show that we should not despair of success in a good cause. An etfort, made by a delegation in Congress capable of doing their duty, and sustained by the voice of the new States, could hardly fail of success. At all events, the object is one of great impor- tance, and I desire to see the trial made. The peculiar situation of Illi- nois, in connexion with her extraordinary embarrassments, and others of the new States similarly situated, would make the proposed surrender especially desirable. I regard this subject, fellow-citizens, as one of the most abiding interest, and possessing an intrinsic importance that reaches far beyond all local or personal considerations. There are other subjects that might be noticed. One is abolition, or an attempt to induce the Federal Government to interfere with domestic slavery as it exists in the southern and middle States; and the other is the assumption of the State debts by the General Government. The first is stimulated by a misdirected philanthropy, calculated to destroy the very objects of the proposed bounty; to disturb the repose of society; and to involve the country in blood. The second is the work of stock- gamblers and stock-jobbers in this country and in England, to enhance the price of American securities, which have been sold, and are now held by them. In my judgment, fellow-citizens. Congress has no power to meddle with either subject. At the adoption of the Constitution, the institution of slavery was fully recognised among the compromises that were indis- pensable to the establishment of the Federal Government. No power was conferred on Congress to interfere with it, and none, therefore, exists. And I hold that those who advocate an interference Avith it, in violation of the Constitution, are guilty of moral treason to the Government. In regard to the assumption of State liabilities, the Constitution confers on Congress the power to pay her own debts, and none others. For this purpose she can lay and collect taxes, and for no other purpose. She has neither money nor constitutional ■ power to pay the State debts, nor to guaranty their payment. And if she had the power, the imposition of a tax for that purpose by the General Government, would be more oppres- sive upon the people, than for the States to do it themselves. Whoever is elected, may count upon a struggle with a great hanh^ in its violent and systematic strides for a recharter, with a capital of fifty or a hundred millions ; with the question of the assumption of State debts and which, if carried, would make our present republic a great consoli. dated government; saddle it with an interminable national debt, and place t under the control of stock-gamblers, instead of the people ; with the grasping spirit of avarice for the public lands ^ first to onich the popidous States, and then to purchase up the negroes for colonization, as a boon to the Abolitionists, for the support they have given to the federal party. These measures are openly avowed at the appropriate points in the coun- try, and where the avowal will do no mischief to their cause before the election. They are hailed as the harbingers to success, with the undying adversaries of free government. The signs of the times are portentous, and let no man mistake their warning voice. Toward all these obnoxious measures — measures pressed by their advo- cates, in open violation of the Constitution, and most if not all of which are stimulated by influences proceeding from the British isles — I wish it distinctly understood that I am opposed ; and that if you honor me with an election to represent the State in the Senate, they will meet with an opposition at my hands that admits of no compromise. In conclusion, gentlemen, 1 will add, that at the present crisis, the sta- tion is one of no ordinary importance to the citizens of Illinois. All will admit that it should be our highest aim to direct the action of the Govern- ment so as to preserve the purity and vigor of our institutions. This is now the only free government on earth. It has done more, in fifty years, to elevate the moral and political condition of man, than has been eftected by other civil institutions since the Christian era. It has made the name of our country respectable in every quarter of the globe, and should be preserved at all hazards. To do this, our greatest reliance is found in a strict construction of the Constitution ; in abstaining from all interference with the just authority of the States ; in directing legislation so that its benefits may be enjoyed equally by all classes of society, and exclusive privileges by none ; and in a steady resistance to monopolies — the deadliest canker upon the body politic. These are the sentiments of the Democratic party, as maintained by the founders of our political church ; and, as such, have ever received my unyielding support. They should be inscribed, not only over the por- tals of the State house, but over the doors of the humblest dwelling. A vigorous maintenance of them is made doubly important at this time, and indispensable to their perpetuity^. Your obedient servant, Danville, October, 1840. SAM'L McROBERTS. Lb N '10