3,.507 80
It thus seems clear tiiat Negro students in both colleges and industrial
schools pay nearly a third of their expenses in work and cash and thus are
not charity scholars to a much larger extent than the stuiieuts in most
white institutions.
Finally we come to the (jtiery :
C. What curriculiun of college stiulies is best suited to young Negroes?
Little careful work has l)een done in the direction of ascertaining what
improvements in the Negro college course are needed. Nor is this strange.
So much time and energy is consumed in collecting funds and defending
principles that there is little leisure left presidents for internal adjust-
ment and development Tlie exposition and comi)arison of college courses,
made on pages 10 to 11. sliow ol)vious faults. The older New England
college curriculum of forty years ago still holds in the Southern institu-
tions with little change. This should be remedied. A large place should
be made for English, History and Natural Science in most curricula at
the expense of some other studies. Various other changes might obviously
be made. All this work can easily be done when the existence problem of
these struggling institutions is nearer solution.
- From reiM)rt.s .sent from the various institutions. Tlie income and t'xpen-- u>r ImnihI i« indiKled
at Ilanipion and .Vtlanta, and possiiily at other ini-titwiions.
32 THE COLLEGE-BRED NEGRO
The central nutli whicJi tliis study teaches to the candid mind is the
success of hijrher education under the limitations and difficulties of the
past. To be sure that training can be criticized justly on many points:
its curriculum was not the best; many persons of slight ability wei'e
urged to study Algel»ra before they had mastered Arithmetic, or German
before they knew English ; quantity rather than quality was in some
eases sought in the graduates, and above all.thei-e \yas a tendency to urge
men into the professions, particularly the ministry, and .to overlook busi-
ness' and the mechanical trades. All these charges brought against the
higher training of Negroes in the past, have much (jf truth in them. The
defects, however, lay in the application of the principle, not in the prin-
ciple; in poor teaching and studying rather than in lack of need for col-
lege-trained men. Courses need to be changed and improved, teachers
need to be better equipped, students need more careful sifting. With sucli
reform there can be no reasonable doubt of the continued and growing
need for a training of Negro youth, the chief aim of which is culture
rather than bread-winning. Nor does this plain demand have anything
in it of opposition or antagonism to industrial training — to those sclu)ols
which aim directly at teaching the Negro to work with his own hands.
Quite the contrary is the case, and it is indeed unfortunate that the often
intemperate and exaggerated utterances of some advocates of Negro edu-
cation have led the public mind to conceive of the two kinds of education
as opposed to each other. They are rather sui)plementary and mutually
helpful in the great end of solving the Negro problem. We need thrift
and skill among the masses, we need thought and culture among the
leaders. As the editor has had occasion to say before:
"In a scheme such as I have outlined, providing the rudiments of an
education for all, industrial training for the numy, and a college course
for the talented few, I fail to see anything contradictoiy or antagonistic.
I yield to no one in advocacy of the recently popularized notion of Negro
industrial training, nor in admii'ation for the earnest men who emphasize
it. At tiie same time, 1 insist that its widest realization will l)ut increase
the demand for college-bred men — for thinkers to guide the workers.
Indeed, all who are working for the uplifting of the American Negro have
little need of disagreement if they but remember this fundamental and
unchangeable truth : tite object of all true edncution is not to make moi carpen-
ters — it is to make carpenters men."
5 27
> >
-7
.^^
r.^
;^ -^^ ^^Q^ .V^^ -^ ^^^^ '^^^^ '
.0^
./'-^.
. o " o «
■0 "t
^O,
'.'^
^|;^:^^'. '
-I o
* o .
V^ f ' • "
•1
°:W:
-7-
•tMJ^-^'
^\^^'
<^
o >
^VTTiTvv^^^o
'^\H\f^.
,-h'
«
.0^
4 '
' • . 1 ■
'J' ~
• '^o ^^'^ *V
CI
• /
^■/*-
r'^
K .
'^irrr-
V
»»•<>,
"r,^.,-?'.'
° >
o i.
^
.u
sV
0*3.
^z^-
^
>c^»
.-■^'
:^
A
<■
0^ .*>..>^-i.
-> •»
■• <
-■^ -
T'^-.
.^'
i <<
r
V
*" ' °-
*■ -.^..^ ■
4
I;
A-
-p
1* ,» .-^
,'% -
• » ^ * A'
'"./
<.:i*"-^
'4
■;•!:;,: