'-^^^'^> 
 
 J 
 
 
 ;V^,, 
 
 
 
 
 ^^^^>:'S> 
 
 .IBilAIiyOFCONGRE^y.y 
 
 
 DNITLii lATlio i)F AMERICA 
 
 
 '*-'•% <«.-* * % -^ '%»%'%.%. ■ 
 
 
 
 ^"^ -^^^?Si^ 1*1'^^-^^'^^^ 
 
 ^;^l>j>- 
 
 
 
 "~3>^'':^^^ 
 
 
 

 
 ''^>.^ 
 
 
 ^^^\j» 
 
 
 
 y^:^ 
 
 
 ,>>j^j[; 
 
 
 
 
 
 ^ ^'t38i> '"^ ^ .. 
 
 
 ~J2S> '3 
 
 
 
 
 ?* ^"^^ 
 
 
 '1>.J^-." 
 
 
 
 3'>j»->. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Digitized by tine Internet Archive 
 in 2011 with funding from 
 The Library of Congress 
 
 http://www.archive.org/details/evidencesofmoderOOwhit 
 
EA^IDEIsrOES 
 
 MODERS SPIRITUALISM, 
 
 BEING A DEBATE 
 
 HELD AT 
 
 DECATUR, MICHIGAN, 
 
 March ISth, 13tli, and 14:tli, 1861, 
 
 BETWEEN 
 
 MK, A, B, WHITING AND REV. JOS. JONES, 
 
 UPON THE QUESTION 
 
 " Resolved, Tliat the origin, of IMoclem Spiritvial plienonaeria is 
 
 entirely hypotlietical, and tlierefore, tlie revelations 
 
 from tlaat sonrce are not at all reliable. " 
 
 Eeported by C. C. flint, 
 
 i 
 
 Of the "Chicago Daily Democrat." 
 
 CHICAGO: 
 
 p. K0UND3, STEAM BOOK AND JOB PEINTINa HOUSE, 46 STATE STREET. 
 
 1861. 
 
Entered according to Act of Congress, in the Office of the Clerk of the District 
 Court of the United States, for the Northern District of Illinois, 
 
 By a. B. whiting. 
 
 2^ i A 1 2^, 
 
HEPOETER'S NOTE. 
 
 The following debate was reported by the undersigned, at tbe request 
 of Mr. A. B. Whiting, and bas been prepared by me for tbe press. 
 The fact tbat tbe arguments of Mr. Whiting occupy more space tban 
 tbose of Mr. Jones, arises from tbe fact tbat tbe former speaks with 
 far more rapidity tban tbe latter, and, therefore, said much more in 
 tbe same space of time. Tbe arguments of each speaker were reported 
 with equal fullness, and with perfect impartiality ; and with tbe omis- 
 sion of a few verbal repetitions, appear in these pages just as they were 
 delivered. 
 
 C. C. FLINT, Reporter. 
 
 Chicago, April, 1861. 
 
o6^ 
 
FIEST SESSION. 
 
 The parties to the debate, namely, A. B. Whiting, Esq., and Kev. 
 Joseph Jones, met at Decatur, pursuant to the arrangements pre- 
 viously made, on Tuesday evening, March 12, 1861. A large 
 audience of both sexes had assembled to listen to the debate. 
 
 Messrs. Henry Canoll, John Woodson, J. H. Wallace, and 
 John Tarbell, all of Decatur, were appointed a Committee to pre- 
 side at the debate, and of their number, Mr. John Tarbell was 
 chosen as Moderator. 
 
 The Moderator read the rules which were to regulate and govern 
 the debate, and which had been agreed upon by the disputants. 
 They were as follows : The question to be discussed is — 
 
 Resolved, That the origin of Modern Spiritual phenomena is entirely hypo- 
 thetical, and therefore, the revelations from that source are not at all reliable. 
 
 Agreed, First, That the Bible in this debate is not at all admissable. 
 
 Agreed, Second, That any reflection on the moral character of the respec- 
 tive parties, to which either of the disputants, may be attached, shall be 
 considered a breach of courtesy. 
 
 Agreed, Third, That all offensive personalities on the part of either of the 
 disputants, shall be considered a breach of courtesy. 
 
 Agreed, Fourth, That it shall be the duty of the Chairman to prevent dis- 
 cursiveness in either of the disputants, and to rule out all questions that 
 shall have a tendency to divert the attention of the audience from the legiti- 
 mate channel : Provided, that in case of dispute, the matter shall be referred 
 for final decision, to a committee of three. 
 
 Agreed, Fifth, That the Committee shall be chosen in the following man- 
 ner : one by each of the disputants, they to select the third. 
 
 Agreed, Sixth, That the debate is to be held at Decatur, prior to the 15th 
 of March, at the discretion of the challenged party, he giving two weeks' 
 notice. 
 
 Agreed, Seventh, That each Disputant shall occupy thirty minutes, alter- 
 nately, in replication — af&rmative opening and negative closing. 
 
 Agreed, Eighth, That this discussion shall continue three days, or may be 
 closed sooner, by mutual consent of the Disputants. 
 
 Agreed, Ninth, That Mr. Simmons be chosen a Committee of Arrangements. 
 
 The Moderator then introduced to the audience the Rev. Mr. 
 Jones, who said : 
 
 I think that it is important, before proceeding to this debate, to 
 attend to some preliminary matters that are to govern us in the con- 
 
6 MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 duct of the discussion. It will be necessary to determine the time 
 at which, the debate shall open and close, and to attend to some other 
 matters which had better be settled now. We may anticipate several 
 such points. It is especially necessary to fix the time when the 
 debate shall be closed. My opponent, Mr. Whiting, may have some 
 suggestions to make on this pointy or some of the Committee may 
 have such suggestions to offer. 
 
 Mr. Whiting said he had suffered the gentleman who had been 
 selected by Mr. Jones and himself, (Mr. Simmons) to have the entire 
 control of this matter ; but he was willing to leave it to the audience 
 to say whether the debate should be conducted in the evening alone, 
 in the day-time alone, or in the day and evening also. 
 
 Mr. Jones stated that his understanding was that the debate was 
 to continue three days, and not three nights merely, and he had made 
 his arrangements in accordance with this understanding. He would 
 want three entire nights to say what he himself had to offer, alone. 
 He could not consent to be so hurried as he would be, were the 
 debate compressed into three nights only. But as there was a mis- 
 understanding on the subject, it had better be settled now. He 
 wished that the gentlemen of the Committee would express their 
 opinions. His belief had been that the debate was to occupy three 
 entire days, with a morning, noon, and night session, and he had had 
 hand-bills printed so announcing it. The people had also so under- 
 stood it, and had paid their money to listen to a debate of three entire 
 days. 
 
 Mr. Whiting was willing to leave the decision to the audience or 
 the Committee. If his memory did not fail him, however, his oppo- 
 nent and he had both concluded, in conversation, that three sessions 
 each day would require too much speaking, and he was of that 
 opinion now. 
 
 Mr. Jones said he could talk as long as he had a soul within him. 
 He cared nothing about the fatigue of speaking, although he knew 
 that the proposed amount of speaking would necessitate much fatigue. 
 As public announcements have been so made, he thought it would be 
 better to have day sessions. 
 
 ^r. Whiting. — "Are you willing to leave the decision of the 
 subject to the audience ?" 
 
 Mr. Jones. — " I do not know who to leave it to. I want to hear 
 from the Committee. We are the servants of the people in this 
 matter, and want to do what is right. If that is wrong, I want to 
 know it." 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 7 
 
 Mr. Simmons said, that the question as to the time of holding the 
 debate had been talked over by the disputants, and had been left 
 undecided by them, and entirely in the hands of the Committee of 
 Arrangements. The Committee, after mature deliberation, had ar- 
 rived at the conclusion, that three night sessions would accommodate 
 the greatest number of people, and the hand-bills had been struck so 
 announcing the fact. This had been done with the knowledge of Mr. 
 Jones. 
 
 Mr. Jones suggested that the debate be commenced to-night, and 
 continue for several nights — possibly for every night this week, and 
 certainly for more than three nights. He had told Mr. Simmons that 
 three nights would never do; and by his consent other hand-bills had 
 been printed. 
 
 Mr. Tarbell suggested, that there be two sessions each day, at 
 half-past ten o'clock A. M. and seven P. M. Mr. Jones asked when 
 the debate would be concluded under that arrangement. The reply 
 was, on Thursday evening. Mr. Jones insisted that this would not 
 be a debate of three days' duration. He thought it of the utmost 
 importance to fix this matter definitely. He wanted a decision as to 
 the time of closing the debate. He was bound to have a debate of 
 three full days, if possible. The time is proposed to be curtailed, and 
 three days are to be shortened into two. He had supposed, also, that 
 the debate would commence at ten o'clock this morning, and that it 
 would occupy three entire days. He hoped that the debate now was 
 not about to be cut down to four hours in each day, and the three 
 days curtailed into two. 
 
 Mr. "Whiting stated, that he had engaged the services of a Ke- 
 porter to take down this debate for publication. Under the belief 
 that the debate would occupy but the three days decided upon by the 
 Committee of Arrangements, he had so informed the Reporter, who 
 had made his arrangements accordingly. It would be impossible for 
 the Reporter to remain longer than the time designated. 
 
 Mr. Jones said, he knew nothing about any arrangements for a 
 Reporter. He was glad that one was present, and had had some in- 
 tention of engaging one himself. But the people, or at least his 
 friends, had paid their twenty-five cents each to listen to a debate of 
 three whole days, and they ought to have it. He repeated his re- 
 marks about the importance of settling preliminaries now, and said he 
 did not think it right to call nine hours three days. We could speak 
 for but one hour to-night, and it was proposed to confine the debate 
 to four hours on "Wednesday and Thursday. 
 
8 MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 Mr. Whiting again expressed his willingness to leave the whole 
 matter to the people. If any injustice was to be done to them, let 
 them he the judges of it themselves. 
 
 Mr. Wallace moved that the debate proceed for one hour to- 
 night, each party speaking thirty minutes; and that three sessions be 
 held on Wednesday and Thursday, of two hours each, at ten o'clock, 
 three o'clock and seven o'clock; and that the debate close on Thursday 
 evening. 
 
 This motion was put to the audience, and carried by a large vote. 
 
 Mr. Jones said, there was another matter to be determined on. It 
 was usual, in discussions of this kind, for each disputant to have the 
 privilege of briefly replying, at the close of each speech of his oppo- 
 nent, to any misrepresentations of his argument or positions made by 
 the other party. 
 
 Mr. Whiting replied, that the rules of the debate prescribed that 
 the affirmative disputant should open the debate, each session, and 
 that the negative disputant should close it; but on Mr. Jones again 
 pleading for the privilege of having five minutes at the end of each 
 speech for correcting misstatements or misrepresentations, Mr. Whiting 
 agreed to it. 
 
 Mr. Jones then opened the debate as follows : 
 
 OPENINa FOK THE AFFIRMATIVE. 
 
 3Ir. Chairman, Ladies and Gentlemen : — It may be necessary, at 
 the commencement of this discussion, to explain its occasion. The 
 itinerant Spiritual lecturers have been, again and again, in our vil- 
 lage, and have, on all occasions and in my presence, grossly misrepre- 
 sented the actions and intentions of that form of faith to which I 
 belong; not that denomination of Christians of which I am a mem- 
 ber, simply, but the Church at large and the opponents of Spiritualism 
 to whom I stand related. It has been said that we of the clergy shun 
 investigation into the truth of Spiritualism. My friend, my opponent 
 here, has asserted this in our village here, time and again, in and out 
 of my presence. This statement is an exceedingly strange one, and 
 my conscience enables me to declare that, so far as it relates to me, it 
 is grossly false ; for if any man ever thoroughly investigated the sub- 
 ject of Spiritualism, that man is myself. I have used the utmost 
 and the most unwearied exertions to obtain an insight into its so- 
 called philosophy. I went, in New York City, to several of the lead- 
 ing Spiritualists there — among them the publisher of the Spiritual 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 9 
 
 Telegraph — and was directed by him to visit certain eminent Spirit 
 mediums. Several female mediums were named, and several male 
 mediums ; among the latter, Dr. Redmond. I have read the Spiritual 
 books which are considered by Spiritualists as best expressing and de- 
 fending the Spiritual philosophy, and have done my best to obtain a 
 knowledge of the facts and the so-called philosophy of this peculiar 
 ism. So the statement that the clergy shun the investigation of 
 Spirituahsm, is not true so far as it regards me. 
 
 But it is also asserted by the Spiritual lecturers that we of the 
 clergy do not allow the people to think and judge for themselves, in 
 this and other matters. In private conversation I have repeatedly 
 denied this. We give the greatest liberty to those over whom we 
 have control. We do our best to promote thinking and intelligence 
 among them, by throwing out thoughts for their investigation and 
 judgment. We do not attempt to bind any one over whom we have 
 control. And I believe that the more the people do investigate the 
 subject of the claims of spiritualism to belief, the more firmly will 
 they become convinced of its entirely superstitious character — that 
 it is a system of phenomena resulting from the sentimental part of 
 our nature — a system coming down to us from the ages of the past — 
 the dark ages — when men were rude and unlearned, and when letters 
 were scarce — when every one, as the poets and historians of those 
 times have told us, saw a ghost or spirit in every church yard, in 
 every field, and around every house. But as intelligence and the 
 light of civilization advanced, these things were going away, like 
 clouds dispersed by the sun at mid-day, until this Spiritualism came 
 upon us. It is because we wish the people to think about these things 
 and to investigate them, that we have thrown out the challenge for 
 this discussion. 
 
 * But it is often said of us that even should we investigate the sub- 
 ject of spiritualism, and become convinced of the truth of its claims, 
 we should not confess our conviction, and for what reason is best 
 known to those who make the charge. This is a grave slur cast upon 
 our profession, to say that the class of men to whom I belong is so 
 immoral, for I will use that word, as to refuse to confess what they 
 know to be true. For my own part, I deny this, and I assert again, 
 that I have investigated the subject of Spirituahsm most thoroughly, 
 and trust to be able to prove, before this debate be ended, that my 
 researches have not been in vain. 
 
 Another reason why this challenge has been thrown out, is that 
 
10 MODEEN SPIKITUALISM. 
 
 Spiritualism, unlike every other imposture, lias actually challenged 
 investigation of its claims. It lias tlius displayed an apparent candor 
 and frankness wliicli commands my admiration. All other impostures 
 have shrunk from investigation. The imposture of Mahommed, and 
 of the other pretenders of Heathen history, would not sanction, much 
 less challenge, investigation. But Spiritualism stands boldly forth, 
 and loudly and vauntingly challenges investigation, and to those who 
 know that all the other impostures, of which history is full, shunned 
 investigation and research, this fact appeals with great power. They 
 suppose there must be something in this system which is intruded 
 upon their attention with so much dogmatism and pertinacity. They 
 think there must be something supernatural and supermundane in 
 these manifestations, which claim so much for themselves, and which 
 with this dogmatism and pertinacity, clamor for an investigation of 
 their authority and genuineness. 
 
 We will show you that no such cause exists for these manifesta- 
 tions ; and that reasons may be assigned therefore, which are entirely 
 of earthly and natural origin ; that there is nothing supernatural or 
 supermundane about them. It does not become me to prove any- 
 thing of this kind, under the terms of the question which we are to 
 discuss, but I shall do so most gratuitously, and not only show that 
 the so-called spiritual manifestations are not certainly of a spiritual 
 origin, but that they really have an earthly and a natural origin. 
 
 The question upon which this debate is made, reads as follows : 
 
 ^^ Resolved, That tlie origin of modern Spiritual phenomena is entirely 
 hypothetical, and that the manifestations from that source are consequently 
 not at all reliable." 
 
 Now, the word "hypothetical" denotes uncertainty; and it is my 
 intention to show you that it is very uncertain that the manifesta- 
 tions it produces are of spirit origin ; and if I do this, I will have 
 been successful in maintaining my afl&rmative position on the question 
 I have just read to you. 
 
 I hope that my opponent, in his reply to the arguments and facts 
 which I shall advance, will adhere closely to the question. The in- 
 vestigation, you will remember, is confined strictly to modern Spirit- 
 ualism : it has nothing to do with ancient, heathen or scriptural 
 Spiritualism, but simply with that which is in our midst; which 
 Judge Edmonds declares is manifested in every hamlet and every city 
 in our nation. If it is so general, so wide-spread, so universal, as its 
 friends claim it to be, it becomes us to seek out its origin and to judge 
 
MODERN" SPIRITUALISM. ll 
 
 it by itself. Let us not run off and seek its connection witli any 
 ancient manifestations of spiritual intercourse; but let us attend 
 closely to that whicb is in our own midst, and tbe baselessness of tbe 
 claims of wbicli Tve are desirous of demonstrating. Therefore, I hope 
 my opponent will keep close to the words and the terms of the text. 
 
 We expect that in this debate we stall be misrepresented and our 
 position misstated. We do no injustice to our opponent when we ex- 
 press this expectation ; for neyer does a Spiritualist stand up to speak 
 of the Church of Christ without misrepresenting it or its claims. I 
 shall look for this ; and I desire to say distinctly now that if it does 
 occur, I shall take no more notice of it than I would of the hypotheti- 
 cal man in the moon. If my friend chooses to abuse that Holy Book 
 on which my faith is founded, and on which all my hopes depend, I 
 shall not attempt any answer to his attacks. By the rules of this de- 
 bate, the Bible is excluded as evidence ; for the reason, that if the 
 phenomena of modern Spiritualism, so-called, be jeally of spiritual 
 origin, that fact can be demonstrated without the aid of any book at 
 all. We care not for the Bible, or for the work of any historian in 
 such an inyestigation as this. If these manifestations occur, we are 
 as capable of attesting and investigating them as the ancients were, 
 and we claim the right to do so. I trust that my friend will remem- 
 ber that we are obliged by the rules of this debate, to attend to the 
 investigation of the origin of modern Spiritual phenomena. 
 
 It will be said, in the course of this debate, that we do not under- 
 stand the philosophy of Spiritualism. When I hear this expression 
 used, I feel like exclaiming, '• Gracious Heaven ! save the mark I" 
 They who use this term do not understand the meaning of the word 
 philosophy. They prostitute that beautiful word when they talk 
 about the philosophy of Spiritualism. Pay attention to these hifalu- 
 ting expressions — to these resounding words — and then pay attention 
 to our answers thereto, and you will see that the origin of these so- 
 called spiritual manifestations is very hidden, very recondite, very 
 abtruse, reaching down even to the bottom of the bottomless pit. I 
 hope my friend will not attempt to throw odium upon his opponent 
 by accusing him of ignorance of the subject he is discussing. Every 
 Spiritualist with whom I have conversed on the subject has assured 
 me, with an air of magnificent superiority, "Oh, you don't under- 
 stand the philosophy of Spiritualism, or you would not talk so I" 
 But I have been at great trouble to understand it ; and I challenge 
 anybody in this room to xmderstand it better than he does, who now 
 
12 . MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 addresses you. I have traveled many miles, and expended mucli 
 money on purpose to understand it, and I tliink that I do. 
 
 In this session, because of the lateness of the hour, I shall not en- 
 ter into any of the evidences of the imposture of Spiritualism ; these 
 are reserved for to-morrow. But my opponent will be so kind as to 
 keep closely to the question in his remarks. I shall try and do so. I 
 believe that if we conduct this debate with gentlemanly courtesy, and 
 with a sincere desire for the advancement of truth, it will be promo- 
 tive of the moral good of the place in which we live. 
 
 OPENINa FOR THE NEGATIVE. 
 
 Mr. Whiting commenced his opening as follows : 
 
 As was suggested by my opponent in his opening speech, we can do 
 no more than commence the good work this evening. In regard to 
 one point made by my friend, I wish to be clearly understood. This 
 is in regard to the esclusion of the Bible from the debate as evidence. 
 It was my own wish that the Bible should be admitted as part of the 
 evidence in this discussion. It is a book I have never treated with 
 disrespect, but always with a proper degree of courtesy. But my 
 opponent himself wished the Bible excluded, and the rule was so 
 made. 
 
 With regard to the origin of spiritual manifestations, I expect to 
 be able clearly to show that there is in these manifestations something 
 beyond and above the normal powers of man, and that these mani- 
 festations contain within themselves the proof of their own spiritual 
 origin. I shall not take the liberty of telling you, as my opponent 
 has done, what you are to expect in the course of the discussion from 
 him. He has alluded to the fact that he anticipated misrepresenta- 
 tions at my hands. I shall not say this of him. I will leave it to 
 the audience to decide what course he and I shall pursue. 
 
 My friend has said thsft in this investigation the testimony of others 
 — ^human testimony — was of no avail; and that he should demand 
 evidence that could be brought home directly to him. This he has 
 a perfect right to do, and to reject any and all evidence that is not 
 satisfactory to himself : but he has no right to judge what evidence 
 will be satisfactory and convincing to you. You are each for himself, 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 13 
 
 individually, to receive that whicli appeals to your own good judg- 
 ment ; and if the testimony we shall offer you shall be sujficient to 
 show you that there is convincing proof that the origin of modern 
 spiritual manifestations is a spiritual one, you should be governed by 
 that proof. The evidences we shall introduce are the same as those 
 which are so frequently offered by orthodox theologians in proof of 
 the divine origin of the Bible, viz. : 
 
 First, the sublimity of these spiritual manifestations. 
 ■ Second, the fulfillment by them of many prophecies. 
 
 Third, the miracles of healing diseases, of speaking in unknown 
 tongues, and other gifts peculiar to modern spiritual manifestations, 
 as well as to those of more ancient days. I shall claim that these 
 evidences demonstrate their spiritual origin by their own internal 
 truth. We shall then refer to various physical manifestations; among 
 them the painting, by spiritual hands, of portraits of deceased per- 
 sons, some of whom the painting medium never saw or heard of, and 
 some of whom had been dead at the time of the painting of their por- 
 trait, more years than the medium artist had lived. These manifest- 
 ations claim to be spiritual. Here is a claim set up : " We say," they 
 exclaim, " that we are spirits : every rap, every tip of the table, every 
 manifestation of the kind is made through spiritual agency." These 
 manifestations come, not only through the low and ignorant, the ob- 
 scure and the humble, but also through the mediumship of the great 
 and shining lights of the world at the present day; through the poets, 
 the artists, the learned men, the savans of this country and of Europe 
 — aye, and through ministers of the gospel, who, with all due respect 
 and courtesy to my opponent, are certainly entitled'to fully as much 
 respect, consideration and belief as he. Now, is it to be supposed 
 that these men are all either false in their claims as regards these man- 
 ifestations, or that they are self-deceived ? Are they not capable of 
 reasoning, of understanding, of weighing the quality and quantity of 
 evidence which has convinced them of the spiritual origin of these 
 manifestations ? We think they are. We shall introduce here the 
 evidence of these learned, candid and profound men of Europe 
 and America, and ask you to weigh and receive it as you would any 
 other evidence of equal weight and respectability. I will also offer 
 you the evidence of my own experience, both in this and adjoining 
 States, which I have gathered through a period of several years, 
 passed in the investigation of these phenomena. 
 
 My opponent will ask me why we do not produce these manifesta- 
 
14] MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 tions here. I answer, that these manifestations can take place only 
 when certain conditions have been complied with, that are always 
 previously demanded. It is not claimed that the spirits which cause 
 these manifestations are perfect and can control these conditions ; but 
 it is claimed, that under these certain conditions there is sufficient evi- 
 dence to convince any thinking mind that the authors of these mani- 
 festations are spirits. If these manifestations were all the result of 
 some mysterious throe of the mind of the medium, why do not the 
 mediums own the truth ? Even our opponent will admit that some 
 of these mediums are honest men and women ; that they are not all 
 intentional deceivers ; that they are not all willingly lending them- 
 selves to what they know to be an imposture. If he will n6t admit 
 this much, the people will. Are these mediums then all self-deceived 
 or deceivers ? As we go on and quote manifestations which have 
 occurred, and some of which I have myself witnessed, I trust you 
 will listen to me with calmness and attention. We have that confi- 
 dence in the candor and good .sense of the people of Decatur, that 
 leads us to believe that you will do this. 
 
 When we consider the growth of modern spiritualism — when we 
 look back for twelve years, and see the wonderful progress it has 
 made — when we remember the millions of minds: who have become 
 convinced of its truth — when we see it stretching out its giant 
 arms across the ocean, and embracing within its circle such men as 
 Lord Brougham, Sir jS. L. Bulwer, Dr. Ashburner, and Sir David 
 Brewster — when we see it obtaining a footing in the palace of the 
 TuUeries, and behold the life of Napoleon, Emperor of the French, 
 saved by spiritual manifestations, procured through the channel of 
 mediums in Paris — when we hear that the learned Baron Groldenstub, 
 of Grermany, is a believer in its truth, and that the illustrious Russian 
 family with which the celebrated medium Home has allied himself, 
 are living witnesses to its authenticity — when we see all these great, 
 and learned, and eminent men bowing down before this great gospel, 
 are we to suppose that a system which could command such believers, 
 is founded on a mere hypothesis ? 
 
 If these manifestations are worth anything, if they are to be 
 credited at all, they are worth everything to mankind. If they can- 
 not be explained upon any other hypothesis than that their origin is 
 spiritual, it is an evidence of the truth of our position. 
 
 We have first the assei;tion of the spirits themselves. This is the 
 beginning of the chain of evidence, which, as we contend, will lead 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 15 
 
 any truthful and candid mind to the belief of tlie spiritual origin of 
 these manifestations. There is no claim set up that the manifesta- 
 tions are produced by magnetism, by odyllic force, or by satanic in- 
 fluence. "We are the spirits of the dead; of those who, like you, 
 once lived and loved on earth; we are the spirits of your departed 
 friends — of your wife, who still cherishes the love which blessed you 
 while on earth, and who watches over you now with an unceasing care ; 
 of your husband, whose warm and true afi'ection for you the cold 
 hand of death has not chilled; of your father, your mother, your 
 sister, your child, who lived only long enough for you to see and 
 learn how fair and beautiful it was." These are ever their assertions, 
 and the truth of these assertions they are ever ready to demonstrate. 
 Not that I mean to say that they can at all times control all the con- 
 ditions that are necessary for these demonstrations. We cannot say 
 to our spirit friends this evening, come up here upon this platform 
 and show yourselves to this audience. But we do claim that these 
 spiritual manifestations, and they, too, of the most satisfactory and 
 convincing nature, are occurring every day, and we shall ask you to 
 give your attention and your judgment to the evidence we shall ofl'er 
 to show to you that this is true. We shall give names, and dates, and 
 places, and accumulate evidence of this nature until unbelief, with an 
 unprejudiced mind, shall be impossible. 
 
 One of these evidences is the universal and continued belief which 
 has always existed in the human heart, in all ages of the world, of the 
 reappearance of the dead. Dr. Johnson, that great and learned man, 
 the biographer of Shakspeare, said, in reference to this universal 
 belief: 
 
 "That the dead are seen no more I will not undertake to maintain against 
 the concurrent and unvaried testimony of all ages and of all nations. There 
 is no people, rude or learned, among whom apparitions of the dead are not 
 related and believed. This opinion, which, perhaps, prevails as far as human 
 nature is diffused, could become universal only by its truth ; those that never 
 heard of one another, -would not have agreed in a tale which nothing but 
 experience could render creditable. That it is doubted by single cavillers 
 can very little weaken the general evidence; and some who deny it with their 
 tongues confess it by their fears." — Dr Johnson. 
 
 Every nation has cherished such a belief, and its universality can 
 only be accounted for by the hypothesis of its truth. This applies 
 to the manifestations of modern spiritualism, as well as it did to those 
 manifestations of communion with the world of spirits, which ap- 
 peared in the days of Dr. Johnson. I have no means of knowing 
 what will be the course of my opponent. But whatever it may be, I 
 
16 MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 shall endeavor to refute the arguments he may advance, and to prove 
 by my own arguments, that these manifestations of modern spiritu- 
 alism contain within themselves the proof of their supermundane and 
 spiritual origin. 
 
 If it be true that the spirit of the mother who bore you, and who 
 watched over you with that infinite tenderness and love, that a 
 mother's heart can only know, still is near you, and can communicate 
 with you ; if it be true that your kind and noble father, who trained 
 you in the path of rectitude and virtue, still can watch over and 
 guide you; if it be true that your beloved wife, in whom your very 
 life seemed bound up, and whose death seemed to take away all that 
 was lovely and delightful in life, still lives and loves you as she did 
 of yore, and still can make that love manifest to you ; if it be true 
 that the spirit of that little child, which seemed so much like an 
 angel while on earth, that the blow which took it from you, did not 
 surprise so much as it grieved you, still hovers around you, and can 
 assure you of its angelic presence — if all this be true, does it not 
 come home to every human soul, and is it not important that you 
 should be convinced of truths which bear with them so much com- 
 fort, consolation and strength ? 
 
 The question agreed upon covers the whole subject. If my oppo- 
 nent proves that these spiritual manifestations are not of a spiritual 
 origin, he gains his case. But, on the other hand, if he does not 
 prove that, and we establish clearly that they are of spiritual origin, 
 you will realize the relevancy of our evidence. By all theologians, 
 and by all orthodox bible students, great stress is laid upon the 
 sublimity, the fulfillment of prophecy, and the miracles of healing, 
 which they claim establish the divinity of Christ. We shall take the 
 same course, and shall claim that these same evidences form the 
 spiritual origin of these modern manifestations. I have no intention 
 to abuse the Bible or the Church. There shall be no such abuse, 
 and the rules we have adopted forbid it, even if so inclined. Spiritu- 
 alism invites research and investigation, and although my opponent 
 has given it the credit of this fact, we say that while it challenges 
 investigation, it leads you to candor, and to the reception of truth ; 
 and we advance this to show that it is not an imposture. Where did 
 you ever find an imposture willing and anxious to challenge investi- 
 gation ? Such an instance cannot be found in the history of the past 
 ages, or in the records of the present. But Truth always challenges 
 examination and research — falsehood always shrinks from it. Like 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 17 
 
 Gallileo, who invited even his persecutors and opponents to look 
 through the telescope and to behold for themselves the evidence of 
 the truths he adduced, we invite you to look through the telescope of 
 religious truth^ and behold the glorious stars which sparkle upon the 
 firmament of modern spiritualism ; and as your eyes are brightened 
 by their radiance, so shall your spirits be enlightened to receive the 
 truth. But as Pope Urban refused to investigate the truth of 
 G-allileo's statements, and declared by his infallibility, that it was im- 
 possible that the earth should move, so are there some who are ready 
 to declare by their infallibility, that Spiritualism cannot be true. But 
 the people, the nation at large, is ready for the reception of truth. 
 
 My opponent has declared that he would show that the origin of 
 these spiritual manifestations reached clear down to the bottomless 
 pit. "We are glad that he has departed from the terms of the resolu- 
 tion which we are to discuss, so far as to say this. "We should like 
 to have that fact proven. If he does prove that the origin of these 
 manifestations reaches down to the bottomless pit, he will prove that 
 they have a spiritual origin; for, according to all theologians, there is 
 a world of dark, lost and miserable spirits, who inhabit that world of 
 woe, which he designates as the bottomless pit; and if he can show 
 that these dark spirits originate these spiritual manifestations of 
 modern times, we can also show that the bright and happy spirits of 
 the departed can likewise come from their celestial home to revisit 
 the earth. If he meant that the spirit manifestations had their 
 origin in the dark abode of damned souls, he has, himself, overthrown 
 his position, which was a denial that these manifestations had any 
 spiritual origin at all. 
 
 Here Mr. "Whiting's time expired. 
 
 Mr. Jones wished to ask Mr. "Whiting whether, during this de- 
 bate, he should address the audience in his own individuality, or as 
 simply the medium for another. 
 
 Mr. "Whiting replied that he did not know that this was at all 
 relevant to the discuijsion. He held himself responsible for whatever 
 he might say. 
 
SECOND SESSION. 
 
 Wednesday morning, March 13. 
 
 Tlie Moderator stated, that in accordance witli the agreement 
 previously made, Mr. Jones would open the debate again for the 
 affirmative, in a speech of thirty minutes. 
 
 Mr. Jones said — 
 
 Mr. Chairman^ Ladies and Gentlemen: — It affords me unqualified 
 pleasure to be able to congratulate my spiritual friends upon their 
 recent conversion. We were assured by our opponent last night, that 
 you believed in the Bible. Hitherto I had supposed you had enter- 
 tained an entire disbelief of that holy book ; but, if my friend's state- 
 ment be true, I offer you my sincere congratulation on your conversion 
 to truth. My friend, in alluding to the exclusion of the Bible as evi- 
 dence in this debate, endeavored to make capital out of the fact that 
 he wished the Bible admitted, and that I desired it to be excluded. 
 ' We assigned, last night, the reason why it was agreed that the Bible 
 should have nothing to do with this discussion. Judge Edmonds says 
 that these modern spiritual manifestations exist in every city and in 
 every hamlet in our country. If so, cannot their claims to a superna- 
 tural origin be determined without any reference to the Bible ? Sup- 
 pose that some extraordinary circumstance, some remarkable phenomena 
 should occur in Decatur, and that when you went to investigate that 
 manifestation, you should be told that it must be true in all that it 
 claimed to be, because it was proven by the Bible. Would not you 
 consider a man, who should thus address you, as a fit subject for a 
 lunatic asylum ? But in addition to this, we desired to exclude the 
 Bible from this debate because the Spiritualists deny the truth and 
 axxthenticity of that book. If we assert this, they will tell us it is 
 not true; and I have often been surprised at the wonderful amount 
 of piety which these Spiritualists would exhibit upon such an occa- 
 sion. The Bible not true ! they would exclaim, in holy horror ; why, 
 
MODERN SPIEITUALISM. 19 
 
 it is you who are the infidels and not we ; it is you who have stricken 
 hands with the Infidel Hume and assumed his positions, and it is we 
 who are the real Christians ! No people have such an attachment to 
 the Bible as we have ! Now, the truth is that the Spiritualists be- 
 lieve the Bible just as much as they believe Shakspeare or a last 
 year's almanac. Shakspeare and Milton, to them, were quite as much 
 inspired, if not even more so, as Isaiah was; and although Jesus spoke 
 some words of truth, they have made such advances in spiritual pro- 
 gression, that his inspiration is quite eclipsed by their own. They 
 believe just as much of the Bible as they believe to be true ; and just 
 as much of it as they believe not to be true they reject. How won- 
 derfully profound and remarkably recondite that is ! If you bring 
 the Bible into a discussion, they will select those portions of it which 
 seem to sustain their positions, and which, by the way, are always the 
 mere suppositions of the people who wrote them, and they will swear 
 that these parts of the Bible are infallibly true ; but that the por- 
 tions which condemn them are also and equally infallibly false ! In 
 fact, they believe the Bible just as President Jackson believed the 
 Constitution of the United States — that is, just as he understood it; 
 and they understand that all parts of it which reflect upon them are 
 entirely false. It would also be absurd to assert that the Bible would 
 be legitimate evidence in this debate, for the reason that this is not 
 a religious discussion. I should never belittle myself so much as to 
 debate Spiritualism as a religious subject. There is a sort of religion 
 built upon it, I know ; but my opponent, I understand, builds his reli- 
 gion entirely upon the revelations of nature. I hope these explana- 
 tions will satisfy my spiritualistic friends. I should consider it too 
 great a sacrifice of my dignity to treat Spiritualism as a religion. 
 
 My opponent spoke of the rapid progress of Spiritualism ; of the 
 four millions of souls, who believe in it in this country alone ; of the 
 large number of illustrious literatti and savans of England and Europe 
 who had embraced it ; of its obtaining a footing in the Court of the 
 Tuilleries ; of its stand in the high places of England ; of its num- 
 bering among its disciples a Brougham, a Bulwer and a Groldenstub ; 
 and from all this he would infer its truth. Now then, there are rea- 
 sons in the constitution of the heart of man, and in the thing itself, 
 which will account for this wide-spread prevalence of the imposture. 
 It appeals to the personal vanity and pride of mankind. It is a large 
 thing to be possessed by the spirit of John Milton, Lord Bacon, or 
 some other eminent man; it is very flattering to the vanity of a young 
 
20 MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 man to fancy tliat lie is possessed by the spirit of some Italian poet, 
 or by tbe shade of Sir Isaac Newton, or some other eminent man of 
 former years ; and hence many of these mediums make these preten- 
 sions through this spirit of vanity. Again, Spiritualism appeals to 
 the native belief in the supernatural, which has ever been found im- 
 planted in the heart of man : that belief which exists as well in the 
 untutored savage as in the polished citizen. This belief leads us, 
 when any story purporting to be from the other world reaches us, to 
 listen to it : this natural instinct of the soul is taken hold of, and we 
 strain our ear to catch the sound of the celestial music of the spirit 
 land. But when we listen for these spiritual manifestations and spir- 
 itual songs, we listen in vain. Spiritualism also appeals to that beau- 
 tiful sentimentalism which exists in every human soul. Very 
 beautifully, indeed, was this sentimentalism appealed to by my friend 
 in his opening remarks. I was pleased with the beautiful manner in 
 which he alluded to the belief that the spirit of the beloved wife, and 
 husband, and sister, and parent revisited us on earth and communed 
 again with those they had left behind them. Would to God that this 
 belief were true ! But it is not so ! The pretension that these man- 
 ifestations do occur, is a falsity ; and we declare that this sentimental- 
 ism of the human heart has been shamefully abused by Spiritualists, 
 and that their claims are as false as the light that shines on glory's 
 plume. 
 
 But Spiritualism also appeals to man's dislike of revealed religion. 
 Wherever you find a Spiritualist, you find a bitter opponent of ortho- 
 dox religion : one who looks upon it as the very incarnation of hell, 
 and the foulest fiend that ever afflicted poor humanity. Who will not 
 join the Spiritualist in this hatred of religion ? Does not the claim 
 of Spiritualism appeal to the depraved instincts of man — to infidels 
 who hate the truth of Grod as proclaimed from the pulpits of his min- 
 isters ? The fact is, that modern infidels do accept Spiritualism as 
 true ; and I shall prove that most of the leading Spiritualists have 
 been leading infidels. 
 
 I have to observe here one point that my opponent made. He said 
 that if these manifestations cannot be explained on any other satis- 
 factory hypothesis than the one of spiritual origin, then our resolution 
 falls to the ground. Now, I want you to observe the fallacy of the 
 Spiritualists in this matter. They declare that certain extraordinary 
 things have happened ; and if we cannot explain how they occur and 
 what is their origin, they insist that their theory is the only correct 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 21 
 
 one and must be accepted. Now, I remember that when I was a 
 boy, tbe Wizard Jacobs came to tbe school wliere I was then studying, 
 and gave an exhibition of his jugglery. He exhibited things to us, 
 which we could not understand ; but our teacher warned us not to 
 believe that these wonders were the work of magic, simply because 
 we could not understand how they were produced. Now, when these 
 Spiritualists come before you and exhibit their unaccountable mani- 
 festations, just be so kind as to tell them of the wonderful things that 
 Wizard Jacobs and Blitz and Anderson will do — things that they can- 
 not explain any more than you can explain their so-called spiritual 
 manifestations ; and then ask them if the tricks of these Wizards are 
 to be accepted as supernatural because you cannot tell how they do 
 occur. Would not this be preposterous ? Is everything that is unac- 
 countable to be accepted as supernatural ? I do not know whence 
 coal comes ; but I know that coal exists. I do not know its composi- 
 tion — ^whether its elements are vegetable or mineral ; but I do know 
 that it exists. Now, I do n't know where these spiritual manifesta- 
 tions come from ; but on that account am I to be made to jump to the 
 conclusion that they must come from spirits ? Yet this is the logic 
 of our friends. Wizard Jacobs, come back again ! There is a man 
 who can do things you cannot explain, and he will deceive you as 
 thoroughly as any Spiritualist can do. 
 
 Take the fact of gravitation : we know that such a law in nature 
 exists ; but we do not know its theory ; we cannot get at its cause ; 
 we cannot explain it; — in one word, am I to jump at the conclusion, 
 because I see that matter is governed by this principle, which I can- 
 not understand or explain, that in every particle of matter resides a 
 spirit ? Take the phenomena of vegetation — the most common and 
 universal of all phenomena — ^none can explain it : there is a great 
 mystery here ; but if even a little child should say that because we 
 cannot explain why the grass and the flowers grow, therefore we must 
 admit that supernatural and spiritual causes are the origin of vegeta- 
 tion, we should regard that child as a fit subject for admission to the 
 asylum for idiots. And our spiritualistic friends are fit subjects for 
 such an asylum, when they assert that, because we cannot explain the 
 origin of their manifestations, we are bound to accept them as spirit- 
 ual. This is, indeed, gullibility, insanity, folly beyond all human 
 expression. 
 
 Now a word as to human testimony. My friend has observed that 
 I stated that in this debate, human testimony should be of no avail. 
 
"•A'A MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 I would be a consummate fool to say so. I trust that no such thing 
 was said. Are the Reporter's notes here ? Do they represent me 
 as saying this ? I do believe human testimony to be of the greatest 
 value. All the facts of history, all the truths of religion, all the 
 facts of science, rest upon it. Human testimony enables me to know 
 that my Bible is true, to know that the treasures of science and 
 literatu.re are true; and feeling this, as I do, I am sure no such ex- 
 pression could have escaped me. But although human testimony is 
 of so much avail, and although it is so highly important, is there to 
 be no limit to it ? Shall we believe every one who comes with a 
 marvelous story ; every noodle and ninny who has seen this and that 
 spooke, or this and that marvelous ghost ? We should be bereft of 
 our senses should we be so gulled. I wish to say, once for all, that 
 human testimony is not sufficient to establish the truth of Spiritu- 
 alism; for the reason that every subject must be proven by its own 
 appropriate evidence. Every Court of Justice requires that every 
 case before it must be proven by the best evidence the case can afford. 
 The testimony proposed to be offered by my opponent is not relevant 
 or conclusive. It is not the best the case is capable of. If you say 
 that these manifestations do occur, that these things are done, I 
 reply, bring your mediums here and let us see them perform these 
 things, and produce these manifestations. If you went into court to 
 prove the existence of a certain writing, and you should refuse to 
 produce it, although you had it in your pocket, but should bring up 
 witnesses who would swear you did have it, would not the Court dis- 
 miss your case ? You might say I won't produce this writing, but 
 here is a man who will swear I have it, and here is a man who will 
 swear so also. "Would not the Court order you to be locked up for 
 contempt, for refusing to produce the best evidence, when, according 
 to your own showing, it was in your power to do so ? Why then can 
 we not have these mediums here to produce in our presence these 
 manifestations, of the origin of which we are to debate ? Oh, the 
 conditions ! The conditions are not right ! The conditions are first 
 that you should be extremely gullible. I see, by the expression of 
 the countenances o£ this audience, that there are some gullible people 
 here. Call your mediums upon the stand now, surround them with 
 these gullible people — first let me place some paste-board or some 
 putty beneath the hands of the mediums, and then, if they produce 
 the raps, I will give up the case. My opponent says that they can 
 paint the portrait of a deceased person, whom the medium artist has 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 23 
 
 never seen. I reply, that I will place a name in a sealed envelope, 
 and if they will tell me the name correctly, I will give up to them 
 my whole library, which I value at five hundred dollars. One of the 
 conditions is, that the room must be darkened — it must all be done in 
 the dark — then some one who thoroughly believes must be present. 
 There must be no antagonistic influences present. If there is, then 
 the table cannot be moved an inch, because there are negatives 
 present. When my friend gets up to reply to me I call on him to 
 reply to this point. I know that here in Decatur we are said to have 
 many mediums — some pantalooned and some pantaletted — and I call 
 on my friend to " bring them along, and let us see what they can do. 
 We will not believe without evidence, and I claim that the evidence 
 in this case, to be convincing, must be the best that the nature of 
 the case will allow. 
 
 Here Mr. Jones' time expired. 
 
 ME. WHITINa'S SECOND KEPLICATION. 
 
 Mr. Whiting said : 
 
 In commencing my second replication, I shall answer the last por- 
 tion of my opponent's argument first : namely, his assertions in regard 
 to the availability of human testimony in this debate, and the fact 
 that Spiritualists claim that because these manifestations cannot be 
 satisfactorily explained on any other hypothesis than that of a spir- 
 itual origin, therefore, their origin must be spiritual. This is a part, 
 but only a part of the chain of reasoning, which, in my judgment, 
 proves the truth of my position. I adduced the argument that 
 there was ample proof of the truth of my position, if human testi- 
 mony was of any avail. I did not intend to misrepresent the argu- 
 ment of my friend, but I understood him to make his remarks as to 
 the availability of human testimony, as it related to Spiritualism, and 
 to deny its appropriateness in this discussion. We contend that it is 
 of avail, and that it is appropriate here. My opponent admits that 
 his Bible is proved true by human testimony. If this be so, and if 
 this kind of evidence is sufficient to convince him of the authenticity 
 of the Bible, is it not also sufficient to prove that persons have talked 
 with the departed spirits of men and women who once lived upon 
 this earth, and who now return to warn, counsel or condole those 
 
24 • MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 they left behind tliem? Human testimony we stall adduce in order 
 to prove that these modern spiritual manifestations are produced by 
 the spirits of departed human beings. We do not claim that these 
 spirits are infallible in their utterances, or even that all their revelations 
 are true, any more than all the revelations from this world are true. 
 We say that these manifestations are produced by the spirits of 
 human beings who have laid aside the form they wore on earth, but 
 who are the same beings they were on earth, with the exception of 
 the advances they have made in spiritual progression. Now, the 
 multiform and varied testimony we shall introduce to prove this, does 
 not all come from gullible individuals — persons who are ever ready 
 to believe every superstitious theory that may be placed before them. 
 On the contrary, our evidence will conae from all classes and condi- 
 tions of men, from the rich, the learned, the powerful and the exalted, 
 as well as from the poor and humble. 
 
 Now, as to the first remark of my opponent as to the Bible. He 
 asserts that Spiritualists, as a class, do not believe the Bible; but 
 that they ridicule and abuse it. Although there may be a difi"erence 
 of opinion between my opponent and myself, as to what the Bible 
 teaches, I have no doubt, could it be produced here, that I could 
 derive quite as much proof in favor of Spiritualism from its pages, 
 as my opponent could against it. There are many sects of Christians 
 who found their belief upon the Bible, but they all believe the Bible 
 just as they understand it. Does the Catholic understand the Bible 
 in the same way as the Protestant does; does the Episcopalian under- 
 it as the Puritan does ; does the Presbyterian understand it as the 
 Baptist does? No. The Orthodox Commentator on the Bible is 
 Doctor Adam Clarke, and the Spiritualist has as good a right to 
 accept any other commentator, as the Presbyterian or Methodist has 
 to accept him. 
 
 My opponent adduces, as one reason for the remarkable spread of 
 Spiritualism, that it appeals to the vanity of the mediums. He says, 
 that it is a nice feeling to be possessed by the spirit of John Milton, 
 or of some great Italian poet. Now, the simple and obvious answer 
 to all this, is, that any medium could gain far more credit and renown 
 and pecuniary advantage by denouncing Spiritualism as an imposture, . 
 by claiming that the utterances which he or she gave forth were his 
 own and not anothers, and by claiming for himself the credit of that 
 which, as a medium, he would ascribe to some higher and more intel- 
 ligent influence. If vanity was to be gratified ; if lust of gain was 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 25 
 
 the ruling motive, this would be the course to pursue. The celebra- 
 ted medium, Cora V. L. Hatch, has lately published to the world 
 certain essays, said to be the production of the spirits of Henry Clay 
 and Andrew Jackson. These communications, in cleverness of analy- 
 sis, in profound statesmanship and comprehensiveness of view, com- 
 pare favorably with any of the utterances made by these great men 
 while yet upon the earth. Now, if Miss Cora Hatch, in her own 
 strength and without the influence of some power higher than herself, 
 can produce such essays as these, would it not be far more to her 
 advantage, in every light, to claim this power which she possesses ? 
 Would she not, thereby, gain brighter laurels than those she has yet 
 gathered, and receive an adulation far more flattering to her vanity 
 than any she has yet had ? Most certainly. So with the speaker 
 who addresses you, and who for six years has pursued his investiga- 
 tions into the truth of Spiritualism. He has received many ofi"ers of 
 salaries, ranging from two thousand to six thousand dollars per annum, 
 if he would afiiliate himself with the orthodox churches and preach 
 orthodox religion. Some Episcopalian clergymen in the City of Bal- 
 timore ofi"ered to secure to your speaker a salary of five thousand dol- 
 lars per year, if he would take the orders of that church and become 
 one of their number. That, certainly, is some inducement to a young 
 man, who, if we are to believe my opponent, is wholly actuated, in 
 common with other spiritual mediums, by a love of vanity and a 
 desire for gain. That is, certainly, something to tickle the vanity of 
 a young man ; but it is not enough to buy from me my love of justice 
 and truth. There is nothing in this assertion of my opponent, that 
 the spread of Spiritualism can be accounted for on the ground of the 
 vanity or avarice of its mediums, that will bear the test of investigation. 
 But my opponent next alludes to the sentimentality of Spiritualism; 
 and here I contend that he admits a potent argument in our favor. 
 He admits, that in every human heart there is something that 
 responds to the claims of Spiritualism. Every one desires to know 
 the proofs that he is to be immortal, and longs to catch a glimpse of 
 the eternal world to which he is hastening. Our opponent once admit- 
 ted to us, in private conversation, the ministration of angels. Philo 
 Judeas admitted this, and asserted that the whole air is full of angels. 
 He was a man of learning, of skill and strength of mind; and he 
 declared that these angels were the souls of departed human beings. 
 He also asserted, that the heroes of the Grecians were synonymous 
 with the Hebrew angels. We cannot see how our opponent can get 
 
26 MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 around tlie idea of the ministration of disembodied spirits. If a man 
 desires wealth, and will prostitute every other faculty of liis mind to 
 its attainment, lie will certainly acquire what he seeks. If he desires 
 notoriety or fame and bends his energies in that direction, he will 
 reap the reward of his labors. The great acme of the soul's desire 
 has within itself the power of its own gratification. Every person 
 who desires to live, desires to know how to be happy ; and man does 
 become more and more happy as he advances in true progression. 
 He can acquire a knowledge as well of the spiritual as of the natural 
 world. The sentimental portion of our nature reaches out its hands, 
 and stretches from earth to heaven. 
 
 Again, my opponent says that the popularity of Spiritualism may 
 be explained by the fact, that it appeals to the depraved and infernal 
 instincts of our nature. We take issue with him here. We contend 
 that the heart of man is not naturally depraved, but that his aspira- 
 tions, normally, tend toward the beautiful and the true. As we develope 
 our spiritual natures, we learn, more and more conclusively, that to be 
 good is to be happy. Is this an evidence of the depravity of the 
 human heart ? Is it not an evidence of the very opposite ? There is 
 not implanted in the human heart that hatred of revealed religion of 
 which my opponent speaks. We know that many infidels have tried 
 hard to become convinced of the truth of orthodox religion, and that 
 they only rejected it when, by long and patient investigation, they 
 were forced to do so. These men have searched through the various 
 systems of theology and the long line of church history, and they have 
 ^failed to find any convincing proof of the immortality of the human 
 soul there. But they have looked at the evidences of Spiritualism, 
 and they have been convinced. What does this prove ? That they 
 have lost their power of discernment and analysis ? No; but it proves 
 that they find in the truths of Spiritualism something which demons- 
 trates the immortality of the soul, and convinces their reason and 
 understanding. 
 
 In regard to the demand our opponent has made for the production 
 of these spiritual manifestations here, we expected he would make 
 such a demand. We have often said we did not profess to be a 
 medium for physical manifestations. There are many such in the 
 country, however ; but they all require that certain conditions be com- 
 plied with before these manifestations can take place. My friend laughs 
 at this idea of conditions ; but if we could quote scripture in this 
 debate — which, by the rules, we are forbidden to do — we could show 
 
MODEEN SPIRITUALISM. 27 
 
 him ttat the spiritual mediums of wliicli the Bible speaks, always 
 required certain conditions before they could produce their manifesta- 
 tions. We have proof enough of the existence of these modern spir- 
 itual manifestations, and of their spiritual origin, to send a man to the 
 penitentiary for life. This proof comes from learned and impartial 
 Judges ; from Honorable Senators ; from Representatives ; from the 
 highest walks of life down to the humble peasant, and even to the 
 negro iipon the southern plantation. There is evidence enough to 
 convince any one. If these same witnesses were brought into any 
 court of justice to testify in any case, their evidence would be received. 
 Why, then, shall it not be received here ? . 
 Mr. Whiting's time here expired. 
 
 MR. JONES' THIRD ARQUMENT. 
 
 Mr. Jones said — 
 
 I am much surprised that my opponent should devote so httle of 
 his time to what I consider the prime point in this debate. I stated 
 to him that no court would receive as reliable such witnesses as he pro- 
 poses to bring forward. They are witnesses in their own ease ; and 
 more than this, the subject which they are called upon to prove, is 
 capable of being demonstrated in another and perfectly conclusive 
 manner. Now, I have here a law book of acknowledged authority, and 
 I can read from it, if necessary, to support the position that I now take. 
 Hearsay evidence — that is, evidence which is based upon what he 
 says, or she says — will not be received in any court when positive tes- 
 timony of the same point can by any possibility be adduced. I claim 
 that my friend coming here with his ipse dixit to prove the spiritual 
 origin of these manifestations, will not do. These Spiritualists talk 
 about believing through evidence ] and yet they want us to believe 
 and will not produce any evidence, except their own declarations, that 
 such evidence does exist. I see several ladies and gentlemen around 
 me, who do claim to be able to produce these manifestations. Now, 
 I say to you, come right up here upon this platform and produce your 
 manifestations in the presence of this audience, and I will pay you 
 twenty-five dollars. My friend says that he does not profess to be 
 able to produce physical manifestations or to control them; but he 
 stands up here and speaks, not in his own individuality, but through 
 
28 MODERN SPIEITUALISM. 
 
 the influence of some one whom lie kindly endorses. His own soul 
 has gone out of his body, and some other soul has come into it and 
 moves it. I was surprised when he said, we spirits claim to be spirits, 
 and we prove it by saying that we are spirits. This is a singular style 
 of argument — asserting a thing, and then proving it by asserting it 
 again. This is begging the question. Give us the evidence, we de- 
 mand; give us the evidence even that our opponent is under the 
 control of another spirit rather than his own. True, he speaks with 
 a great deal of ability and fluency, and the profession is, that he 
 is entirely illiterate and unlearned, in his normal state, and that the 
 spirit of some great and wise man is believed to control him as he 
 speaks. He asserts that he is controlled by certain departed spirits, 
 who, through his organism, do the argumentation on his side of this 
 debate. He is here in person, and, if he chooses, can certainly pro- 
 duce the proof of this assertion. Human testimony ! Oh, yes ! 
 Mrs. So and So will swear to it, and Mrs. This will swear that Mrs. 
 That told her so. These women — for it is remarkable that the most 
 ardent Spiritualists are of the softer sex — will swear to anything, so 
 that they can make so much per head out of the credulous ones who 
 believe in them. I make no assertion to be under such supernal influ- 
 ences as those which my opponent declares control him. I may not 
 be so grandiloquent or so eloquent as he ; but at least I am in a nor- 
 mal condition, and he is in a very abnormal one. 
 
 Now, a word about the Bible. My friend declared that we asserted 
 that the authenticity of our Bible rested upon human testimony. We 
 do say so ; and we assert, that that is the best testimony of which the 
 nature of the case will admit. My Bible is not called in as testimony 
 here. If it was, I could prove its authenticity and the divinity of its 
 origin by the best evidence the case will admit of. But Spiritualism 
 is in court, and I desire that it also be proved by the best and most 
 sufiicient evidence, or else, failing in this, that it be rejected. 
 
 We claim that the whole system of Spiritualism is a base, wicked, 
 cruel and tremendous imposture ; and that this is proved by some 
 internal evidences existing in the thing itself. In proving this, I shall 
 indulge in the same style of argument to which my opponent would 
 resort, were he endeavoring to argue against the divinity of the Bible. 
 I feel sorry that Prof. Mahan, in his work against Spiritualism, should 
 treat this system as he would a scientiflc matter : that is no less than 
 allowing a man to cheat you, and then explaining the cheat as a sci- 
 ence ; and yet many learned and able men have fallen into this error. 
 
MODERN SPIRITUASISM. 29 
 
 A more vile imposture, a greater liumbug tlian this so-called Spirit- 
 ualism never existed ; and explaining it away on scientific principles 
 is a sacrifice of dignity to whicli I will never consent. Witli the sup- 
 porters of Spiritualism, it is all right, so long as they get the dollars ; 
 the leaders are knaves, and the followers are not far from the other 
 thing. 
 
 One evidence of the imposture of Spiritualism is in the exceed- 
 ingly trifling character of the phenomena itself For instance, tables 
 are tipped ! — dignified and intelligent that is ; is it not ? — pianos are 
 lifted ! I should like to see them at it ! — as the Irishman said, here 
 is the man that would like to see you do it ! Stoves are lifted up ! 
 I was lately reading, in the Spiritual Telegi^apli, of a ghost lifting up 
 a stove and placing it on the table. Oh, what an egregious lie ! I 
 will put this water jug down upon the floor, and you shall call upon 
 your spirits to place it again upon the table. If you do it, and I can't 
 explain how you did it, upon perfectly satisfactory and natural prin- 
 ciples, I will give up the debate. The spirit that put the stove 
 upon the table might have been the spirit of Lord Bacon, as they 
 allege ; but if it was, it was Bacon smoked ! Ah ! my Spiritualistic 
 friends will now say, he is ridiculing ! Bless your soul ! you can't 
 speak of this thing without laughing right out ; I defy a man to keep 
 a straight face while he reads of these ridiculous things, even when 
 told by their believers and advocates. 
 
 Now, in regard to another claim of these Spiritualists. They say 
 they can give us likenesses of deceased persons, painted by spirit 
 hands ; but these likenesses are to be taken in the dark ! That is one 
 of the conditions ! If you do n't believe it, you can write to the per- 
 sons whose names they will give you, and their replies will satisfy you. 
 This is the human testimony they talk so much of! Now, I hold in 
 my hand a pamphlet, which is devoted to the puffing of Jayne's patent 
 medicines. It is full of certificates of the remarkable cures which 
 have been produced by those medicines; and if you don't believe 
 them, says the pamphlet, you can write to the persons whose names 
 are attached to the certificates, and satisfy yourself! 
 
 Now, I wish to read you an extract from one of Judge Edmonds' 
 books, descriptive of what he actually experienced during a visitation 
 from the spirits ; and as I read it, I wish my opponent to attend 
 strictly to the sublimity of this passage : 
 
 " Then it was that the chair ran back and iforth on the floor. The bell was 
 rung over our heads, and one of the party was forcibly torn, by an invincible 
 
30 MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 power, from my grasp, in spite alike of his strength and mine. As I stood in 
 a corner where no one could reach my pocket, I felt a hand thrust into it, and 
 found that six knots had been tied in my handkerchief. A bass viol was put 
 into my hand and rested on my foot, and then was played upon; another violin 
 was hung arounrdhmy neck by one of its strings, and I was struck frequently 
 with a fiddle-bo'fr. My person was repeatedly touched and a chair pulled out 
 from under me." — Judge Edmonds^ Spiritualism. 
 
 But, then, the intelligence of these manifestations! Oh, yes, we 
 will attend to that. Yon will pnll long faces and say that we are ridi- 
 culing; but we can't pursue this investigation without exposing 
 absurdities and follies that would be laughable if they werei not so 
 mournful. The author of a spiritual book, called "Love and Wisdom/' 
 at page 130, claims that the spirit of Franklin — that great and good 
 man — dictated the following intelligent and sublime lines, writing 
 them beneath a portrait of himself drawn by spirit influence : 
 
 " The likeness of this portrait is to represent 
 The likeness of man when he dwelt here below ; 
 But the likeness of the spirit you would like to know — 
 And this would be no more than I would like to show — 
 But the mind is not prepared the likeness for to see 
 The spirits from the angels' home as bright as we." 
 
 Now, Milton, depart ! — shade of Milton, move off ! Here comes 
 the spirit of Franklin, and, by this sublime effusion, throws you 
 entirely in the shade ! 
 
 If you don't like this, try another, which is from the same book, 
 "Love and Wisdom," page 160, and which is a communication from 
 the spirit of George Washington, written by himself; there is no 
 mistake about that. These lines, like the ones written by Franklin, 
 were written under a portrait of Washington. They are in a splendid 
 metre. I should like some one skilled in versification to tell us what 
 metre these lines are written in. Is it hexametre ? Here it is : 
 
 "When the likeness of this portrait you see, 
 Remember that it is to represent the likeness of me ; 
 But the spirit in its brightness you cannot see, 
 Por it's now far above the brightness of thee." 
 
 Oh, sublime production of the immortal Washington, who led the 
 American armies to battle and freed this land from British oppression, 
 and whom we worship as the Father of our country ! 
 
 So much for the poetry of Spiritualism. We shall allude to poetry 
 again, however, when we come to speak of the poetry of our friend,' 
 our able opponent in this debate. Now for prose. " The Penetralia," 
 a work written by the sublime seer of Poughkeepsie, Andrew Jackson 
 Davis, the great and shining light in the gallaxy of American Spirit- 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 31 
 
 ualists, thus answers an important and weighty question. At page 
 209, he thus answers the question — 
 
 "Does Spiritualism have this eflfect on humanity? 
 
 "Yes; it proves that man is an organized, substantial spirit. 
 
 "It proves that his organized spirit is immortal." 
 
 Now, the man who wrote that was a consummate fool ! He was 
 perfectly demented ! I defy any one to say what an organized spir- 
 itual substance is. Who ever heard of an organized spirit ? He who 
 believes this twaddle is nothing better than a ninny. 
 
 But you must not question the word of the spirits ; it would be 
 very unjust to question it. Now I am going to read you an article 
 from a spiritual paper, called The Mountain Gove Journal^ in an article 
 upon "Spirit Cosmogony," as follows : 
 
 "God the life in God the Lord in God the Holy procedure organized the first 
 orb creation in form of appearing as one globular ovarium, which was the 
 germ of the terrestial universe of universes ; and within the globular was the 
 embryo of the external of the universal, impersonal creation, as one curvi- 
 linear ovai-ium ; and within the curvilinear the germ of the external of the 
 universal, personal or intellectual creation in one form of vertical ovarium. 
 
 "In the beginning of the orb formation preparatory for man formations, 
 vehicles of the quickening spirit into intellectual formations, the univei*sal 
 concavity, and the universal convexity were co-enfolded and encompassed in 
 the universal zodiac, and within the concavity was the visible disclosure unto 
 the germ of the terrestial." — Mountain Cove Journal. 
 
 Now, will some one put that into good English ? Is not that a 
 beautiful emanation from the spirit world? What are "vehicles of 
 the quickening spirit 1" It would require spiritual paper and spiritual 
 pen and ink to tell ! 
 
 Here Mr. Jones' time expired. 
 
 MR. WHITING'S THIRD REPLICATION. 
 
 Mr. Whiting said — 
 
 In noticing the various portions of my opponent's argument, I shall 
 again first notice his positions in regard to human testimony. He 
 insists again, that in producing human testimony here to prove the 
 supernatural origin of the modern spiritual manifestations, we do not 
 produce the best evidence of which the case is capable. I affirm 
 that we do produce the best evidence, for this reason : that physical 
 spiritual manifestations seldom occur in public assemblies like these. 
 Sometimes they do. If we could present here one medium that we 
 
32 MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 know of, we could produce the raps here in the most satisfactory man- 
 ner. I allude to the well-known test medium, Miss Ada Hoyt, of 
 Chicago ; but certain conditions are always necessary for the produc- 
 tion of these physical manifestations. There must be, in the first 
 place, a certain degree of receptivity, not of gullibility, on the part 
 of those present; then there is required a certain degree of order 
 and quiet. That these physical manifestations have occurred in the 
 most satisfactory manner, there is the most conclusive and abundant 
 testimony. There are persons in this audience who can testify to the 
 conclusive nature of these manifestations, given both in Chicago and 
 Dowagiac by Miss Hoyt. Mayor Wentworth — a man of integrity 
 and learning, whose name is known all over the country, and whose 
 intelligence and uprightness is unquestioned — presided at one of her 
 lectures at Chicago. Many of the most respectable citizens of Chi- 
 cago were present, and the manifestations were of the most astonish- 
 ing character. Mr. Wentworth wrote an account of them, and 
 published it in the Chicago Democrat. We think that if our oppo- 
 nent continues his investigations into the truth of Spiritualism with 
 the same industry with which he has commenced them, he will reverse 
 his decision concerning its truth. Many persons who have started 
 out with the belief that Spiritualism was an imposture, have, by inves- 
 tigation, become convinced of its truth. Dr. Dodds is an illustration 
 of this. He wrote a book in opposition to the doctrine of Spiritual- 
 ism and afterwards became convinced of its truth. So of Dr. Hare : 
 he became convinced of the falsehood of Spiritualism, and wrote 
 against it ; but, pursuing his investigations, he discovered his error, 
 and his declining years were soothed by the consolation which ever 
 attends the true believer in the doctrines of immortality as taught by 
 the Spiritual philosophy. He was a man known and respected all 
 over the world, wherever learning and profound ability were known, 
 and his opinions on science and art are quoted to-day by all the world 
 of letters. With all due respect to my opponent, Dr. Hare was cer- 
 tainly as capable of forming a correct opinion upon this subject as he. 
 Now, a word in regard to these physical demonstrations which my 
 friend is so anxious should be produced here. I have myself seen 
 many of these demonstrations. I have seen a stove lifted from the 
 floor without hands. Near Williamantic, Connecticut, I saw a little 
 girl, twelve years old, place her hand upon the top of a stove, which 
 was then lifted up by the force of the spirits and placed upon the 
 table. The little girl could never have accomplished this feat herself, 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 33 
 
 and no one else (in the Tbody) touclied the stove. Two respectable 
 lawyers, who were present at this scene, can testify as to the truth of 
 it. The question is not, whether these manifestations are sublime or 
 not ; but do they show the presence of an external power, superior 
 and separate from that of the medium through whose organism the 
 manifestations take place? On the occasion referred to, the spirit 
 was requested to move the stove three times ; which it did, showing 
 that it had intelligence. If this power was not a spirit, what was it? 
 It said it was a spirit. These manifestations continued to be made for 
 weeks at the residence of this little girl, and they were seen by hun- 
 dreds. No money ^was taken from the spectators — it being refused 
 by the father of the child, who is a wealthy and respectable farmer. 
 But why don't you bring these manifestations here ? again demands 
 my opponent. We reply, that we do not claim that we have the power 
 to do that ; but we bring here the most conclusive evidence that such 
 manifestations have occurred. Is not that sufl&cient ? 
 
 I deny that I have said anything which justifies my opponent in 
 the assertion that I have declared myself to be under spirit control. 
 Whether I am or not, however, I am responsible for all I say. That 
 is not the question at issue, and I am not to be diverted from the 
 consideration of that point by any personal attacks. The only ques- 
 tion is, is there sufficient evidence to prove that these manifestations 
 are of spiritual origin ? It does not make any difi'erence whether 
 these manifestations are foolish or not. Dr. Slade, of Albion, while 
 seated in his chair, has been raised, chair and all, from the floor to 
 the partition ; Judge Lawrence, of Ann Arbor, James C. Wood, of 
 Jackson, Captain Ward, of Detroit, C. H. Waterman, Hon. J. M. 
 Howard, and many others, who were present, witnessed these mani- 
 festations, or similar ones, and saw a man weighing two hundred and 
 fifty pounds, lifted thus from the floor. These facts can be proved 
 by the evidence of these gentlemen. We shall take pains at some 
 future day to bring Dr. Slade here, and give you an opportunity of 
 witnessing these manifestations yourselves. 
 
 Then there are the demonstrations made through the agency of the 
 celebrated Davenport Boys, who are now in Chicago; and although 
 these manifestations are not so convincing as some others we have 
 named, still they are, to a certain extent, conclusive. The only cir- 
 cumstance which detracts from the convincing character of these 
 manifestations is, that they are done in the dark. But the manifesta- 
 tions which are produced through Miss Hoyt and Dr. Slade — which 
 3 
 
34 MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 are done in broad day light — ^we say, are convincing to tlie most 
 incredulous. Such mediums as these two are, we know, few and far 
 between. There are very few who can command such manifestations 
 as these ; but because they are few, are we to be blamed for believing 
 them, when we have such irresistible proof of their truth ? 
 
 Then we have the manifestations produced by W. P. Anderson, of 
 LaSalle, Illinois, a respectable and worthy man. Through him the 
 spirits have drawn many portraits of persons now in the spirit land, 
 of surprising accuracy and great beauty. These portraits have been 
 generally drawn by him when alone, or in the presence of a few friends. 
 They often are the portraits of those whom Mr. Anderson has never 
 seen ', sometimes of those who died long before he was born, and of 
 whom no portrait previously existed. John H. McFarland, the Post- 
 master of LaSalle, testifies that Mr. Anderson, in this manner, pro- 
 duced correct likenesses of his father and his father-in-law — both of 
 whom were dead, and neither of whom Mr. Anderson had seen. My 
 opponent will say this is no evidence at all, and will demand that we 
 produce this artist here and have him make these portraits in our 
 sight. "Move this table," he cries, "and I will believe." If we 
 were allowed to quote scripture in this discussion, I would be able to 
 show several parallel cases of persons who were in the same frame of 
 mind as our friend. Produce your spirits, he demands; let them 
 move this table one jot, and I will give up the debate; or else explain 
 how they did it. Seal up a question in an envelope, says he, and sub- 
 mit it to your spirits ; and if they give correct answer, I will give up 
 the discussion. Now, there are mediums who do answer sealed letters, 
 and return them, unopened, with correct replies. The late lamented 
 Rogers was another of the mediums through whom the spirits painted 
 portraits of deceased persons. At the residence of the Hon. Charles 
 Cathcart, at La Porte, Indiana, is to be seen a portrait, painted by Mr. 
 Eogers, of the father of Mr. Cathcart, who died many years ago, in 
 a distant country, in the service of this Government. The portrait 
 represents the old gentleman as he appeared in life, with his regi- 
 mental decorations. The portrait was hung in the parlor of the 
 brother-in-law (Mr. Newkirk) of Mr. Cathcart, and people were 
 allowed to see it, without being informed who it represented. Old 
 men, who had known the original of the portrait while alive, were 
 startled at the perfect resemblance ; and one minister of the gospel, 
 who saw it, and was then informed of how it had been painted, ex- 
 claimed, " Wonderful ! It cannot be true !" The portrait still hangs 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 35 
 
 fhere^ in the parlor of Mr. Newkirk, and can be seen. IMr. Catkcart 
 has represented his district in Congress ; has held many responsible 
 offices, and is certainly a credible and reputable man. 
 
 Who this Mr. Harshman — the author of the book, entitled "Love 
 and Wisdom/' from which my opponent has quoted — is, I reallyj. do 
 not know. I never before heard of him. The communications my 
 friend has quoted, he says, purport to come from the spirit world. 
 But, have I told you that you should beheve all that comes from that 
 world ? I no more believe that the spirit of Washington or Franklin 
 had anything to do with the twaddle which was read to you, than he 
 does. But does that prove that the spirit of Franklin or of Wash- 
 ington has never come back to earth ? And as to the extracts he has 
 read from the Mountain Gove Journal : does he not know that one of 
 the editors of that sheet, John Scott, has gone back to orthodoxy, 
 and that the other, the Eev. T. L. Harris, has deserted Spiritualism, 
 and is now in a sort of half-way state between Swedenborgianism and 
 Spiritualism ? Why does my friend not read to you some of the sub- 
 lime lines written by this man in his '' Lyrics of the Golden Age " — 
 poetry worthy of the spirit of Shelly himself? We do not know 
 whether Harris or Scott wrote the metaphysical stuff which my friend 
 has read to you ; but we do know that it does not represent the spir- 
 itual idea of the development of the world. Spiritualists believe in 
 the geological theory of the earth's development. 
 
 As to these extracts from Andrew Jackson Davis' *' Penetraha," 
 we see nothing ridiculous in them. The atmosphere cannot be seen 
 or reahzed — ^but it exists, and is material. It is filled with minute 
 globules, as water is filled with minute animalculse, which are invisi- 
 ble to the unassisted eye, but clearly seen by the aid of the micro- 
 scope. Because a spirit is an organized substance, does it follow that 
 it must be visible to our outward senses? All the prophets and seers 
 of the Scriptures believed in the existence of angels; and when 
 these angels appeared to these holy men, they always appeared in- 
 the human form. The Spiritualists believe that every spirit has a 
 spiritual body. There is nothing absurd in this. Can you conceive 
 of existence apart from organization? Can you conceive of an im- 
 mortal spirit without form ? IMentahty has form, intelligence, power 
 and beauty ; and when laid aside in death, all the external form is 
 there perfect in all its parts. The limbs, the body, the lungs, the 
 brain, the heart, all are there, but the real man is fled. If the real 
 man dies, then is the soul decomposed ; but if it lives it must have 
 
6b MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 an organism and a form. Spiritualism teaches us the substantiability 
 of the soul — that it is not an airy nothing, hut a form. Are spiritual 
 perceptions airy emenations from the soul ? My opponent will admit 
 that there are such perceptions — either given us by the ministration 
 of «angels or from some still higher power. As regards the ridicule 
 and laugh which my friend has sought to raise against us, we have 
 nothing to say — only to express the hope that you will not let your 
 minds be moved by such things. Spiritualism is a religion, and uses 
 its manifestations under all appropriate circumstances and conditions. 
 The spirits of the departed have not come back to earth, says my 
 opponent, to talk in this strain of nonsense and absurdity. If the 
 tipping of a table will convince a man of his immortality, is it not 
 sublime ? If these little raps will open the very gates of Heaven to 
 our gaze, are they not sublime ? If the tapping of a little hand upon 
 the forehead, or the moving of a musical instrument across the room, 
 will prove that our departed and lost friends are still near to us, is 
 not that sublime ? It is the result, and not the means, at which we 
 must look. Grod speaks in the tender and beautiful flower, and in 
 the poisonous and deadly serpent coiled beneath it ; he speaks in the 
 sparkling and gentle streamlet, and in the roaring torrent; in the 
 rugged cliff, and in the verdant and soft vale. He is willing to speak 
 to us not only through the grand and majestic objects in nature, but 
 through the tiny flower and the humble weed. Anything in nature 
 may be ridiculed and laughed at. It is a simple thing to move a 
 table, to make a little rap, to place a hand within a pocket, but when 
 we consider the result, then the apparent triflingness of the act dis- 
 appears. If it was necessary to convince Judge Edmonds of the 
 immortality of the soul, that the spirit of his little child, who in life 
 was wont to sport with him, by placing its hands in his pockets, or 
 by gently tapping him upon the face, should renew these frolics, shall 
 we ridicule these manifestations ? 
 Here Mr. Whiting's time expired. 
 
 MR. JONES' FOURTH ARGUMENT. 
 
 Before the debate re-commenced, the Moderator, Mr. Tarbell, called 
 the attention of the disputants to the fourth rule of the discussion 
 Mr. Jones then resumed for the affirmative, as follows : 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 37 
 
 My time expired when I was giving you some elevating and sub- 
 lime communications from the otlier world. I shall continue that 
 course now, for the purpose of demonstrating the earthly origin of 
 these so-called spiritual manifestations, and of proving the whole sys- 
 tem of Spiritualism to be an imposture. My spiritualistic friends 
 have, again and again, anathematized me, and declared that it was 
 unbecoming a minister of the gospel to treat Spiritualism as I have 
 done. But I treat everything according to its relative merit ; and if 
 I treat Spiritualism in a low and filthy manner, it is because it is a 
 low and filthy thing. I must treat it as I have, on account of its 
 relative merit. 
 
 I do not stand here to quote big names, as my friend does; who 
 reminds me of some Englishman, who, if he is of no account him- 
 self, desires to be associated, in some way, with some great man ; and 
 who, if he can't be a duke, thinks it some honor to know the duke's 
 footman. My friend proceeds in this manner. He tells us of Judge 
 so and so, of Consul this and that, of His Honor and His Excellency, 
 etc. His object is to show, that if Spiritualism is not important in 
 itself, there are some important surroundings about it. Now, if my 
 friends say I ridicule Spiritualism, I reply, that it ridicules itself; and 
 I shall play the game of reading to you the expressions of your own 
 leaders. If you want to hear about Judge Edmonds' spiritual saw 
 mill, and to have a taste of Judge Edmonds' spiritual butter milk, you 
 will have a chance before I get through. 
 
 The earthly origin of these so-called spiritual manifestations is 
 proved by the character of them. They are essentially low and 
 degrading. Everything that comes from Heaven is supposed to be 
 elevating and purifying in its nature; but those of these spiritual 
 communications which are not stolen from books, are extremely low 
 and degrading in their nature. Of course my friend did not know 
 anything of Mr. Harshman, from whom I have quoted ; but I never 
 did know a Spiritualist who knew anybody when what that person 
 said or did, bore down heavily upon the doctrine of Spiritualism. 
 But he knows the '■^Banner of Light," and he will not deny that that 
 is an orthodox and a reliable Spiritual paper. Well, now, in the 
 ^'■Banner of Liglit" I find a communication from the spirit of Patrick 
 Murphy, a real Irishman. The spirit of Patrick Murphy comes up, 
 and speaks as follows : 
 
 [Mr. Jones having failed to supply the Reporter with the commu- 
 nication of Patrick Murphy, it is necessarily omitted. Reporter.] 
 
38 MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 Now, I am ridiculing Spiritualism again, my friend will say ! I 
 beg to inform the Chair, that I am not violating the rule to which he 
 called my attention. I am only reading from their own communica- 
 tions, and showing how ridiculous they are. Now, let us turn from 
 Patrick Murphy to Judge Edmonds. Of course my friend knows 
 something about a book, called "Judge Edmonds' Spiritualism." The 
 Judge went into a trance and saw a spiritual saw mill, which he 
 describes as follows : 
 
 [This communication was also not supplied to the Reporter.] 
 
 Now, I ask, what is there to elevate any one in all this ? What is 
 this but the ipse dixit of a man who is either a deceiver, or who is 
 self-deceived ? And yet my friend declares, that we cannot have any 
 other proof than this kind of hearsay evidence. When we demand 
 that the mediums come here and give us occular proof of their de- 
 monstrations, they are six thousand or six hundred miles away ! They 
 are like the Hibernian's flea : we seek to put our finger upon them, 
 and they are gone ! 
 
 But I have some more of Judge Edmonds' communications to 
 read. This Judge of the Court of Appeals, of New York, an intel- 
 ligent and learned man, comes out with this sort of brain dribble. 
 I read from Judge Edmonds' " Spiritualism," Vol. ii, page 135-144 : 
 
 " She answered she could not tell by years, only by events, but it was be- 
 fore the Crusades. She added, she remained only a few years in the lower 
 plain, when all three were united and ascended together. I enquired of the 
 daughter if she had never been married. She answered she supposed I 
 would call it marriage. There was one to whom she was much attached, and 
 they loved each others society, and they were a good deal together. He was 
 now at work at the saw mill ; and she said he would come in from the saw 
 mill, not at all tired with his work, and would kick up his heels and go to 
 dancing. 'Yes,' added the mother, 'and you join him in doing so.' She 
 showed me a guitar and a flute, and said they played and sang together. The 
 young girl seemed full of frolic, and fun, and joy. She covild hardly keep 
 still. As she and my daughter sat together, I could not help noticing the 
 difference. My daughter was still and quiet, and apparently very intellectual. 
 She was not without emotions, but she repressed them, and I saw her once in 
 a while lay her hand on her heart, as if to hush all within. AVe turned to 
 take our leave, for it was time for us to go. The matron invited me to call 
 on her again, and she would, she said, give me a drink of butter milk." 
 
 Now, I say that these things are so essentially degrading, that on 
 their very face, is prima facia evidence of their imposture. They 
 are too degrading to come from the celestial spheres. I cannot 
 conceive of men in any celestial sphere giving utterance to such 
 expressions as these. 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 39 
 
 Now "we stand here for tlie purpose of demonstrating that the 
 origin of these manifestations is exceedingly hypotheticaL I show 
 not only that they are this, but more ; I show that they are exceed- 
 ingly false, by their own internal evidence. These spiritual commu- 
 nications bring to us no new and noble truths. The spirit of Bacon 
 comes back, and instead of the sublime utterances which he gaye 
 while on earth, he regales us with such brain dribble as we have 
 read. It is said that we cannot have the evidence we desire in this 
 case. I call for no more than I am entitled to. I show to my oppo- 
 nent that it becomes him to prove the origin of these manifestations 
 is not hypothetical, but certain. The evidence we desire he admits 
 is just such evidence as exists, but he says it cannot be produced 
 here. Why? Oh, because the conditions are not obtained! You 
 must have a certain amount of receptivity, he says. Now, when the 
 existence of poison is to be proved in a murder case, in a Court of 
 Justice, that fact must be proved by experimental evidence. They 
 bring their practical chemists into Court, and the poison is analyzed 
 in the presence of the Jury. This is what we desire here. "We 
 want just this kind of positive, experimental evidence. These men 
 say they are inspired — they talk fluently and ably — but those of us 
 who are somewhat acquainted with hterature, can tell where they get 
 some of their fine speeches; and if we knew more of books and 
 literature, we could show where they got the whole of them, and 
 that the whole thing was a cheat. 
 
 I propose to suspend a piece of wood so nicely balanced that a fly 
 would move it, and then I will call iipon the spirits to move it a 
 single inch. In asking this, I am only asking what I am entitled to 
 do by the rules of evidence. If you cannot do this, come and move 
 this table. I see before me five or six medium ladies and five or six 
 medium gentlemen. You say you can do these things; but that you 
 must do them under the proper conditions, and that one of these con- 
 ditions is, that you must be in the dark, and that no antagonistic 
 influences be present. I ask you to come forward and do it in the 
 light, in the presence of this audience; and if you do move the table 
 a single inch, and I cannot explain, upon natural causes, how you do 
 it, I will give up the case. 
 
 Here Mr. Jones' time expired. 
 
40 MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 MK. WHITING'S FOUKTH REPLICATION. 
 
 Mr. "Whiting said — 
 
 I stated this mornings that I should introduce a poem, dictated by 
 the spirit of Edgar Allan Poe, and spoken by Miss Lizzie Doten, 
 before a large audience in the city of Boston, a short time ago. This 
 poem is as follows : 
 
 From the throne of life eternal, 
 
 From the home of life supernal, 
 Where the angel feet make music over all the starry floor — 
 
 Mortals, I come to meet you, 
 
 Come with •words of ueace to greet you, 
 And to tell you of the glory that is mine forevermore ! 
 
 Once before I found a mortal 
 
 Waiting at the heavenly portal — 
 Waiting but to catch some echo from that ever-opening door; 
 
 Then I seized his quickening being, 
 
 And through all his inward seeing 
 Caused my burning inspiration in a fiery flood to pour ! 
 
 Now I come more meekly human. 
 
 And the weak lips of a woman 
 Touch with fire from oif the altar, not with burnings as of yore, 
 
 But in holy love descending, 
 
 With her chastened being blending, 
 I would fill your souls with music from the bright celestial shore. 
 
 As one heart yearns for another, 
 
 As a child turns to its mother, 
 From the golden gates of glory turn I to the earth once more — 
 
 Where I drained the cup of sadness. 
 
 Where my soul was stung to madness. 
 And life's bitter, burning billows swept my burdened being o'er. 
 
 Here the harpies and the ravens. 
 
 Human vampyres — sordid cravens. 
 Preyed upon my soul and substance till I writhed in anguish sore; 
 
 Life and I then seemed mismated, 
 
 For I felt accursed and fated, 
 Like a restless, wrathful spirit, wandering on the Stygian shore. 
 
 Tortured by a nameless yearning. 
 
 Like a frost-fire, freezing, burning. 
 Did the purple, pulsing life-tide through its fevered channels pour, 
 
 Till the golden bowl — Life's token — 
 
 Into shining shreds was broken. 
 And my chained and chafing spirit leapt from out its prison door. 
 
 But while living, striving, dying. 
 
 Never did my soul cease crying: 
 "Ye who guide the fates and furies, give! oh, give me, I implore, 
 
 From the myriad hosts of nations — 
 
 From the countless constellations. 
 One pure spirit that can love me — one that I too, can adore!" 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 41 
 
 Through this fervent aspiration 
 
 Found my fainting soul salvation, 
 For, from out its blackened fire-crypts did my quickened spirit soar; 
 
 And my beautiful ideal — 
 
 Not too saintly to be real — 
 Bui'st more brightly on my vision than the fancy formed Lenore. 
 
 'Mid the surging seas she found me. 
 
 With the billows breaking round me, 
 And my saddened, sinking spirit, in her arms of love upbore; 
 
 Like a lone one, weak and weary, 
 
 "Wandering in the midnight dreary. 
 On her sinless, saintly bosom brought me to the heavenly shore. 
 
 Like the breath of blossoms blending. 
 
 Like the prayers of saints ascending, 
 Like the rainbow's seven-hued glory, blend our souls forevermore. 
 
 Earthly love and lust enslaved me, 
 
 But divinest love hath saved me. 
 And I know now, first and only, how to love and to adore. 
 
 Oh, my mortal friends and brothers, 
 
 We are each and all another's. 
 And the soul that gives most freely from its treasure, hath the more. 
 
 Would you lose your life, you find it; 
 
 And in giving love, you bind it, 
 Like an amulet of safety, to your heart forevermore! 
 
 This poem was copied into many papers, in the East and "West, 
 and excited universal surprise and admiration. The editor of the 
 Springfield (Mass.) Repuhlican — who is anything but a Spiritualist, 
 but who is a gentleman of refinement, education and taste — Says, that 
 it is a wonderful and sublime production, and worthy of the author 
 to whom it is attributed. Its similarity in style to the poems written 
 by Edgar Allan Poe, while on earth, and particularly to his cele- 
 brated poem, " The Eaven," has attracted the attention and admiration 
 of critics everywhere. This poem carries with it indisputable evi- 
 dence of the individuality of Poe's mind, with an entire absence, 
 however, of that taint of sensuality, which marred some of his 
 writings while upon the earth. Tou all know that there is not a poet 
 in the world who can make so perfect an imitation of the "Eaven," as 
 is the poem you have just heard read. This poem has been imitated 
 and parodied, again and again, but never has the imitation carried 
 with it the individuality and idiosynycracy of Poe's mind as this 
 does. So place this sublime poem side by side with the foolish stories 
 my opponent has read to you. I observe, by the way, that he does 
 not quote Judge Edmonds from his own book, but from one written 
 by an opponent of Spiritualism ; and I have no means of knowing 
 
42 MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 wtether the passages lie has read are garbled or not. But, admitting 
 that Judge Edmonds has said, that there were saw mills and horses 
 and cows in the spiritual world, I ask, whether it is not more in 
 accordance with the impulses and desires of an industrious man to 
 be usefully employed, even if it be in a saw mill, rather than to spend 
 a whole eternity in singing psalms before a great white throne, 
 and that is the manner in which orthodox religion teaches us our 
 eternity will be employed. My opponent also said, that the different 
 quotations which he read, purporting to come from different Spirit- 
 ualists, showed up the absurdity of the doctrine of Spiritualism. We 
 cannot see it so. My friend quotes largely from Prof. Grimes ; and 
 his argument sounds so very much like that employed by the Profes- 
 sor, that I have been much amused at the resemblance. I know 
 Prof. Grrimes. I met him in Boston; he attended one of my lectures 
 in that city before the Harvard Professors, and criticised one of my 
 poems ; but he was called to order by President Felton, who said he 
 could vouch for the beau.ty and originality of the poem I had impro- 
 vised. I have heard Prof. Grrimes make the same offer in relation to 
 the suspension of the stick of wood. It is something surprising that 
 my opponent should have followed Prof. Grimes so closely in the line 
 of his argument. 
 
 Now, as to the spiritual communication from the shade of Patrick 
 Murphy, which has given my friend so much disquietude. Suppose 
 that a low Irishman — a man devoid of culture and intelligence, whose 
 days had ever been devoted to toil, and whose mind was entirely un- 
 enlightened — suppose that a man like this should die to-day and that 
 his spirit should return to earth to-morrow; would it not talk just as 
 the spirit of Patrick Murphy did ? I consider that communication a 
 proof of the individuality of mind which exists in the spirit world, 
 and which is taught by Spiritualism. I know the person through 
 whom this communication from Patrick Murphy came. She is JMrs. 
 Conant — a person refined and lady-like, and entirely ignorant of the 
 Irish brogue, in which this communication is written. Does this show 
 that this communication did not come from the spirit ? Does it not 
 rather show that the spirit of some Irishman was the author of it ? 
 We do not claim that all the communications from the spirit world 
 are of an elevating character; but there is quite enough of them that 
 are of such a nature to overbalance the few instances of the contrary 
 kind which my friend has adduced. He may call this poem of Edgar 
 Allan Poe's trash, and say evidence like this is of no avail ; but let 
 
MODEKN SPIRITUALISM. 43' 
 
 any of you read first " The Eaven/' and then the poem we have just 
 read to you, and if you are not convinced that the same mind is the 
 author of both of them, you must be indeed hard to convince. 
 
 Now, I claim that the origin of this poem demonstrates itself on 
 its very face. Lizzie Doten never before gave such a poem, and no 
 one else ever did. "We might go on and quote numerous other spir- 
 itual poems of exquisite beauty and sublimity. If we had here the 
 "Lyrics of the Grolden Age,'^ we could quote such poems from its 
 pages, the work of spirits. Notwithstanding this, I admit that there 
 is that in Spiritualism which appeals to all classes of mind. Patrick 
 Murphy and the poor negro and the illiterate peasant can return to 
 earth from the spirit land, and communicate with those whom they 
 left behind, as well as the spirit of Sir Isaac Newton, or of Lord 
 Bacon ; but the communications from each will partake of his own 
 character. The stream cannot rise above its fountain, and the spirit 
 of Patrick Murphy can only tell what he knows. 
 
 Where, then, is the uncertainty about the nature of these manifest- 
 ations of which our friend complains so much ? Is it because we 
 cannot move a stick of wood at his bidding, a la Professor G-rimes ? 
 Is it against us that these manifestations which he demands cannot be 
 produced here, because the difierent conditions which he ridicxdes, 
 and which are demanded by all mediiuns, cannot be had here ? Even 
 his own illustrations tuim against him. The chemist in making his 
 analysis for poison, demands his conditions : if he makes his analysis 
 at all, he does it in his own way. The court does not undertake to 
 say how he shall do it, but accepts the result when it is done. "We 
 do not say that the mediums can do these things at all times and at 
 all places. Sometimes the spirits which influence them refuse to mani- 
 fest their power, and sometimes the spirit cannot control the mediums. 
 But if the attempt to cause these manifestations was tried twenty 
 times and the attempt failed, it would not cormterballance the positive 
 proof that would be afforded if the attempt once succeeded. If the 
 attempt succeeded only in a single instance, the proof would be irre- 
 sistible. To say that the negative evidence of the twenty failures 
 was to be taken against the positive evidence of the one success, 
 would be to adopt the logic of the thief who brought twenty wit- 
 nesses into coui-t to swear that they did not see him steal a certain 
 coat, and demanded that their negative evidence be taken against the 
 positive assertion of the one man who did see him steal it. This is 
 about the way testimony is called for here. Because we cannot pro- 
 
44: MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 duce these manifestations here, the reliable witnesses who saw them 
 produced elsewhere are to be disbelieved ! It is not because we think 
 Spiritualism is any better for being connected with the names of 
 great men, that we have recapitulated the names of some of its be- 
 lievers ; but we named these great and learned men because it is said 
 that none but the ignorant and the gullible are Spiritualists. My 
 friend said as much as this to-day. Men who believed the things 
 that we believed, in his opinion, were demented, or idiots, or insane. 
 Now, it is very little to the gentleman's credit to be spending his time 
 here in a discussion with demented or insane men, or idiots. I 
 place confidence in reliable human testimony, and I place confidence 
 in the great and learned men of Europe — not because they are titled 
 and powerful, but because they are learned and able to decide on the 
 merits of evidence and on the claims of any system to belief. Not 
 that the humblest Spiritualist in this room is not equally capable with 
 them of deciding for himself what will convince him of the truth of 
 his belief. It is no more ridiculous to talk of drinking spiritual but- 
 ter milk from spiritual cows, than many things are that we have seen 
 perpetrated in the name of Grod at camp meetings, revivals, etc. But 
 we would be just as reasonable in condeming all ministers and all 
 religious meetings on account of these ridiculous things, as he is in 
 condemning the whole system of Spiritualism, because some men, 
 claiming to be Spiritualists, have said or done ridiculous things. "We 
 hope in future that he will quote from the books of Spiritualists them- 
 selves, and not from garbled reports and mutilations of their books or 
 writings. So far as the Mountain Cove Journal is concerned, I will 
 here say that it was edited by John Scott and T. L. Harris. The 
 first has renounced Spiritualism and embraced Methodism. When 
 claiming to be a Spiritualist, he did not profess to be under the gov- 
 ernment of spirits, but declared that he was acting under the especial 
 direction of Grod himself — an assertion and a claim that was not 
 allowed by the Spiritualists, as a class. Mr. Harris became developed 
 as a medium, and as such gave some beautiful poems. He then left 
 Spiritualism and became a sort of Swedenborgian, and went to Europe. 
 But whether the departed spirits who furnish these manifestations be 
 the spirits of Cieeros or of Patrick Murphys, if they leave on thesa 
 manifestations the marks of their own individuality, they carry with 
 them the proof of an origin outside of and independent of the 
 medium, and are, therefore, supernal and spiritual. 
 Here Mr. Whiting's time expired. 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 45 
 
 ME. JONES' FIFTH ARGUMENT. 
 
 Mr. Jones said that as liis opponent had identified him with a 
 celebrated professor, who had written in opposition to Spiritualism, 
 he wished to ask the gentleman a question. Had he understood him 
 as saying that President Felton, of Harvard College, had endorsed 
 his improvised poetry as truly inspired and spiritual ? 
 
 Mr. Whiting replied no. President Felton had said that the 
 poems which Mr. Whiting had improvised in his presence, were 
 beautiful in their sentiment, and original in their language. 
 
 Mr. Jones. — Well, I will read a letter from Prof. Felton. We 
 shall see how much the statements of our friend are to be relied 
 upon. The impression that my friend intended to make was that 
 Prof. Felton was so much surprised and delighted with the poetry of 
 our friend, that he confessed it was original. That is very different 
 however, from its being spiritual. It may be that our friend can 
 improvise poetry — but that is a very different thing from being in- 
 spired. President Felton is a most reliable man. He is known and 
 respected throughout the United States. I endorse him, and am 
 ready to be responsible for what he says. Here is a letter, in which 
 he speaks of our friend, Mr. Whiting : 
 
 An extract of a letter from Professor Felton to the Boston Evening 
 Courier^ August, 1859 : 
 
 "Mrs. Hatcli * * * * gave to a mathematical question a wrong 
 answer, asserting that a thing can be done which is demonstrably impossi- 
 ble ; but instead of doing it, the spirits, through her organism, promised that 
 the problem should be solved within a month, and the name of the spirit 
 doing it should be transmitted with the document; 'or,' said the spirits, 'we 
 will confess that we are disgraced forever.' That was two years ago. The 
 problem has not been solved. ****** There was a young man — 
 a Mr. Whiting — who pretended that the spirit of an Italian poet would im- 
 provise poetry, on any subject, through his organism. His claims were 
 accepted in twenty-one States of the Union, where his exhibitions had been 
 given. When, however, I put the question to the spirit, whether he intended 
 to improvise in his native tongue, to the utter confusion of the medium, he 
 was obliged to confess that he never gave that test except in private." 
 
 Now the impression sought to be made on you by our friend was 
 that President Felton had endorsed him ; but this letter shows that 
 he found out this young man in a decided cheat. Our friend may 
 wince as you hear this — Grod knows you deserve to wince for having 
 sustained such an imposture as this. 
 
 Now, as for this spiritual poetry and its origin. The gentleman has 
 read us a very pretty thing — I think it is sublime. He says, it is 
 
46 MODEKN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 from tlie spirit of Edgar Allan Poe. I doubt it. He proves it by 
 saying tbat a large audience in Boston beard it, and tbat tbey were 
 convinced tbat it came from Poe. Now, I don't know wbere that 
 poem came from ; but in tbe Messenger (a Spiritual paper) of April 
 lOtb, 1852, I find tbe following poem, said to bave been written by 
 a servant girl, thirteen years old. I read from tbe Messenger : 
 
 " The following lines were written on the 18th of April, 1852, by a servant 
 
 girl, thirteen years of age, in the family of , Charlestown, Massachusetts. 
 
 The fact must be stated, that the girl could neither write nor read one word 
 previous to this occasion ; and although she wrote these lines legibly under 
 the spiritual impression, she was unable to read them when written ; 
 
 u 'There is a region lovelier far 
 
 Than sages know or poets sing; 
 Brighter than summer's beauties are, 
 And softer than the tints of spring.'" 
 
 — Extract from. Messenger, an article, entitled "The Spiritual Home," writ- 
 ten by Spiritual Impression, in the Messenger, No. 4. 
 
 Tbis hymn is in the '' Baptist Hymn Book," No. 1174, and 
 accredited to Tucker. It is as follows : 
 
 "There is a region lovelier far 
 
 Than angels know or poets sing ; 
 Brighter than summer's beauties are. 
 And softer than the tints of spring." 
 
 Now, we see wbere some of the improvised spiritual poetry comes 
 from. 
 
 We come to speak of revelations we bave ourself had. We wish 
 to state tbat we have had something to do with these physical mani- 
 festations. I went to Chicago, recently, to visit a medium there, com- 
 mended by my friend here, and of whom he told me that after I bad 
 seen her I would not want to enter this debate. I saw tbis lady, and 
 will tell you all about tbe interview. But while I was in Chicago I was 
 informed tbat I would find some excellent physical test manifestations 
 at a room in Kingsbury Hall. I went there. A gentleman met me 
 at the door, and intimated tbat he would like me to pay him fifty 
 cents. I willingly paid him the fifty cents, and entered tbe room. I 
 saw in the room a large box, or cupboard, with three folding doors. 
 Two boys, aged eighteen or twenty years, were placed in tbis box. A 
 gentleman in the room — a Spiritualist — asked me to assist in tying 
 tbe boys in the box, so that tbey could not move. I declined, as I 
 did not want to have anything to do with it. The gentleman suc- 
 ceeded in getting another person to tie one of the boys, while he tied 
 the other himself. All were invited to see that tbe boys were securely 
 
MODEKN SPIRITUALISM. 47 
 
 tied. In tlie bos were placed a trumpet, a fiddle, a drinn and a bell. 
 Tlie doors were then fastened, and I should tell you that tlie button 
 wliicli fastened tlie doors was placed inside, so tbat we could not open 
 the doors from the outside, and coiild not see what was going on in 
 the box. That was one of the conditions. "We had to take what was 
 going on inside the box on trust. Then our attention was directed to 
 a hole in the center door of the box, covered with a piece of black 
 cloth ; and it was said we should soon see a spirit hand there. Sure 
 enough, in a moment a hand was seen to protrude from the hole, and 
 to wave itself toward us. I asked permission of the gentleman to 
 take hold of that hand. '' Directly," said he; but just then a lady 
 who was in the room, and who was a Spiritualist (you know I can 
 tell them as soon as I can see them) stepped forward and took hold 
 of the hand. " Oh," said she, shuddering, " how cold it is !" That 
 is the way you know. Spirits are always cold ; they don't keep any 
 fires down there. I then endeavored to touch the hand; but the 
 man inside the box — I beg pardon; I mean the spirit — was too quick 
 for me ; and although I made a grab at it, it eluded my grasp. The 
 next thing that came out of the box was a spiritual trumpet. Now, 
 thinks I, if I can't get your hand, I will get hold of the trumpet ; 
 and I seized it, and said : now spirit, spirit, come through here, or 
 let go the trumpet. Now, that was a sublime scene ! I wish one of 
 your spiritual artists had been there to paint that picture ! I made 
 another strong efibrt and wrenched the trumpet out of the hands of 
 the spirit. "Well," said the lady, "you are superior to the spirit in 
 strength, anyhow." After this there were performances on the 
 musical instruments in the box, by the spirits. The boys were tied, 
 and they could not be the performers I oh, no ! And they have never 
 been detected in any imposture, of coiu'se not ! But if this was spir- 
 itual music, it was the last music that I ever want to hear. Then it 
 was stated that there were eighteen spirits in the box, and I won- 
 dered how they could all find room to be in there, if they were all in 
 proportion to the size of the hand I had seen protruded from the box. 
 When the gentleman opened the door and let the boys out, I exam- 
 ined the hole in the door, and saw that it was surrounded with greasy 
 dirt, such as would naturally be made by the frequent application of 
 a sweaty hand. I asked the gentleman how it came to pass that his 
 spirits were so dirty; and he rephed, that the marks I saw were 
 caused by the hands of people endeavoring to get hold of the spirits. 
 I also asked why the boys could not come out and do these things in 
 
48 MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 our sight; and his answer was, that the boys had to be shut up to keep 
 people from imposing upon them by throwing quids of tobacco, etc. 
 
 Now, I mean to say, that all this is one of the most diabolical and 
 cruel impostures ever sought to be perpetrated upon any people. But 
 these boys who practice this weak and silly deception are the celebra- 
 ted Davenport Boys endorsed by my friend, with the single exception 
 that their manifestations are not so satisfactory as they would be were 
 they not performed in the dark. 
 
 Here Mr. Jones' time expired. 
 
 MR. WHITING'S FIFTH REPLICATION. 
 
 Mr. Whiting said — 
 
 I will first settle this matter of Prof. Felton. When in Boston, 
 three years ago, I held a six weeks' session with the Harvard Profes- 
 sors. They selected subjects upon which I improvised poems. On 
 one occasion, President Felton asked if I would improvise in Italian. 
 I said no — not in public ; inasmuch as the audience — which was a 
 very large one — comprised but a very few persons who understood 
 Italian, and that it would be uninteresting to the rest of my auditors : 
 but I added, that I would improvise a poem in Italian, in private, 
 and have done so. These events took place in 1858, and the letter 
 which my opponent has read, was written in 1859. The whole of the 
 letter of President Felton my friend has not read. I have at home 
 files of the Boston Courier^ which state exactly what President Fel- 
 ton did say of my poems at the time of their delivery, and which is 
 just what I have before stated. So much for this matter. 
 
 I will now read to you a letter from James C Wood, of Jackson, 
 Michigan, a well-known lawyer, in reference to the manifestations 
 made through Mr. Slade : 
 
 "Friend Henet: — 
 
 "You desire me to ■write you a description of the physical manifestations I 
 have witnessed through your mediumship ; I will do so in brief with great 
 pleasure. 
 
 "I have sat around a large dining table with you, and heard drumming 
 seeming to be under the table, and sufficiently powerful to jar the table- 
 Any tune might be whistled, and the drumming would be perfect as to time. 
 It did not seem to be one person drumming, but two or three, and sometimes 
 a heavy drumming, imitating apparently a base drum. The distinctness 
 of the sound, and its peculiarity, has always, to me, appeared remarkable. 
 I regard it as one of the most astonishing manifestations of spirit power. In 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 49 
 
 this matter there can be no deception. The jar of the table — the noise, and 
 the exact time, and the change of the tune the iastant the whistle changes, 
 are facts no one can dispute, and cannot be accounted for upon any Imown 
 natural scientific cause. 
 
 "I have seen a large dining table rise up, with great force, from the floor, 
 some six or ten inches, and then go down with equal power — Mr. Slade and 
 others simply having their hands upon the table. I have seen the table also 
 rise up, in the same manner, with a man sitting upon the table, the hands 
 being simply on the top of the table. In my own house I have had a cherry 
 stand, with my little son upon it, rise up in the same manner. I have seen 
 persons undertake to keep it down and still, and although they possessed con- 
 siderable physical strength, they were unable to prevent its movement. I 
 have seen half a dozen men around the stand, with three hands upon it, 
 and two, at least, laboring to keep it still, and in spite of their efforts it would 
 jump up some six to ten inches, and go down with such force as would seem 
 ordinarily sufficient to break the stand. 
 
 "I have seen Mr. Slade, while sitting in a chair, moved about when I was 
 fully satisfied he did not nor could not do it himself under the circumstances. 
 No person in the form did it. I was satisfied it was the operation of some 
 invisible force. 
 
 "I have seen Mr. Slade, when his eyelids were perfectly closed, pick up a pin 
 on the carpet, point out the different colors of the carpet, go into a dark room 
 and pick things up apparently as well as I could in the light. 
 
 "One night this spring Mr. Slade remained with me overnight. Having 
 heard often that one of his attending spirits made considerable noise some- 
 times during the night, and having some curiosity to hear it, I said to his 
 spirit friend, I would like to have him "perform" a little that night. He said 
 he would. I and my friend retired as usual. The Rev. Mrs. Wilber Jack- 
 son and my wife's sister were there visiting me. Mr. Slade occupied a bed- 
 room out of my parlor. My sister occupied an adjoining room. The setting 
 room came next, and I occupied a room adjoining the setting room. My sister 
 kept a light in the setting room during the night. About two o'clock in the 
 morning I heard a loud noise, like some one striking with a hammer on the 
 stove in my room. It startled me, and I sprang up in bed. I could see dis- 
 tinctly in my room. No person, as I could discover, was in either but myself. 
 Immediately after this noise on the stove, noises, like some one taking a shoe 
 and striking it upon the floor, commenced, first in my room and then in the 
 setting room — one then on the parlor door in the setting room, and then upon 
 the opposite side. The parlor door at the same time opening and closing 
 quite rapidly. Mrs. Jackson occupied a room up stairs. She stated, at the 
 breakfast table the next morning, that she was awakened by the door in her 
 room swinging open, and then startled by noises like some one pounding upon 
 the head-board of the beadstead on which she had been sleeping. She said 
 that her heart came into her throat, and she had not been able to get it out 
 yet. 
 
 " I have heard raps upon the floor, then upon the chair, then on the sides of 
 the room and in various places about the room. Such, in short, is a descrip- 
 tion of some of the manifestations I have witnessed in the presence of Mr. 
 Slade. Of course they seem incredible to those who have never seen them; 
 nevertheless I have seen them, and they have been witnessed by many others. 
 The "world moves," and these manifestations, most probably, will, even if 
 the incredulous, the sneering, and the very respectable fogies of the day 
 should never condescend to witness these. 
 
 " Most Respectfully Tours, 
 
 "J. C. WOOD." 
 
 Now, with regard to the production of a spirit hand. Dr. Gray, 
 who is a learned physician of New York, writes as follows : 
 4 
 
50 MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 "The speaker described a manifestation to which he had recently been a 
 witness — the production of a spirit hand, through the mediumship of Miss 
 Catherine Fox — her own hands being held in his, and her feet resting on his 
 own during the time of the apparition, which took place in dim gaslight. 
 The fingers made intelligent motions. Its first appearance was that of a lumi- 
 nous fog ; then it looked like a ball of fire — like phosphoresence. Here was 
 furnished the kind of testimony demanded by the London objectors, viz: that 
 some credible witnesses should have seen or held the spirit hand till it vanished. 
 This manifestation was given in accordance with a request made for this kind 
 of evidence, and by appointment of the spirit at the particular hour. The 
 hand, in this instance, was not placed inside mine, but several friends have 
 had that testimony ; and if any here can furnish me with such, I shall be 
 glad to forward it, together with my own, to London. I have repeatedly 
 touched the spiritual hand, which was sometimes warm and sometimes cold, 
 like that of a corpse. I am not aware that I have ever been in what is called 
 the psychological state ; and I am not subject to hallucinations of the senses. 
 (The speaker mentioned manifestations, through Mr. Home, of naked hands 
 which unhooked the brooch of a lady's collar in full sight.)" 
 
 Now I will read as to what they are doing in London : 
 
 J. K. M. SQUIRES IN ENGLAND. 
 
 "The following appears in the London Spiritual Magazine, under the Cor- 
 respondence head : 
 
 " To the Editor of the Spiritual Magazine — Sir; Dr. Ashburner, Dr. Goodeve, 
 of Bristol, Mr. Newton, Dr. Blank, Messrs. Waterhouse, Norton, Hurrey, self 
 and son, had a sitting with J. R. M. Squire, (junior editor of the Banner of 
 Ldght, a weekly newspaper published in America) at the residence of Mr. 
 Waterhouse, in Russell Square, London, at eight o'clock p. m., on Friday, the 
 16th of July, 1860. Shortly after sitting down at a large dining-room table, 
 about twelve feet long, we heard clicks, or tappings, on different parts of the 
 table ; they were not loud, but distinct — something like the sound produced 
 by the telegraphic clock when in action. 
 
 " The table twice moved from its position a little. Mr. Squire then placed 
 a pencil on a sheet of paper we had marked, and then he held it in his hand 
 under the table ; I heard a movement underneath, and then it seemed as if 
 the pencil and paper were forcibly taken away, and dropped to the floor. Ou 
 picking the paper up we found some letters scrawled on it, which, on looking 
 through the blank side, we found read 'God bless you all.' Dr. Blank felt 
 the pulse of Mr. Squire while this was going on, and the rate was one 
 hundred and thirty-eight beats per minute — his ordinary pulse is from sixty 
 to sixty-five. 
 
 "We then went to a large room; there was in it an uncurtained French 
 bedstead, which Mr. S. removed a little from the wall, and placed nine chairs 
 in a row, against one side of the room, opposite the foot of the bed. There 
 was a very heavy oval shaped table in the room, which we turned over and 
 examined to see that there was no machinery connected with it. This table 
 was placed by Mr. S. at such a distance from the bed as to allow a chair for 
 him to sit upon, between him and the bed ; he then placed another chair by 
 the same side of the bed, and requested me to sit on it ; he then sat on the 
 chair before the table, rested one hand on it, and requested that his legs be 
 tied to the chair, which was done with two handkerchiefs by one of the com- 
 pany ; he then stretched out his disengaged right hand toward me, and I held 
 it firmly till the close of the incident I am about to relate. The nine gentle- 
 men present then sat on the chairs in a row, holding each other's hands, so 
 that no movement could be made by any of them without detection ; the jet 
 of gas at the side of the room was then put out by our host, and in about half 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. ■ 51 
 
 a minute I felt something like a rapid current of air pass me, Mr. Squire 
 said, 'It is gone.' The gas was then lighted, and the table was found top 
 downwards, lying on the bed-clothes at the back of Mr. Squire, it having 
 passed over his head. The company then loosed hands, came up, saw my 
 hands still holding the right hand of Mr. S., and his legs still tied to the 
 chair. The movement of the table was repeated, two others of the company 
 holding the hand of Mr. Squire. He then asked for a pocket handkerchief 
 to tie his wrists. I took mine, tied one end tightly round one wrist, and the 
 other end round the other wrist, leaving the free use of the hands for stretch- 
 ing about six inches. He then desired a gentleman, who had evidently been 
 puzzled with what he had seen, to come and stand with him at one end of the 
 table, and place his hand firmly on one of his, on the top of his, so that it 
 was impossible for him, so tied and bound, in any way to lift the table. We 
 all, except the two so standing, retired again to our row of chairs, held each 
 other's hands, and the outermost one, with his left hand, put out the gas. In 
 about half a minute, a violent blow from the leg of the table struck the floor, 
 and shortly after, Mr. Squire asked us to light the gas. When this was done, 
 a funny spectacle met our eyes. The table top was resting on the heads of 
 the two gentlemen who had been left standing, the legs of the table being 
 toward the ceiling, and the gentlemen's hands still pressing against the top 
 of the table. I took down the table, which, from its weight, I found to be no 
 easy task. The gentleman who had placed his hand on the table, stated that 
 he had pressed his whole weight on the table to prevent its rising, and that 
 it was which caused the legs to come down with so much violence before the 
 resistance was overcome. Of those present," only our host, Dr. Ashburner, 
 Dr. Blank, and myself, were at all accustomed to these phenomena ; and Dr. 
 Blank, till a few weeks ago, opposed by voice and pen, all belief in the sub- 
 ject. Now he frankly acknowledges the truth, but is sorely puzzled with — 
 'what is the use of it?' A question to which we have no doubt he will in 
 time find a satisfactory answer, as numbers have done who have passed 
 through that state of mind in which he at present is. The others were the 
 personal unbelieving friends that Dr. Ashburner 'and I had brought to the 
 sitting, in the hope of something being done, which, by its physical charac- 
 ter, would uproot their theories of cerebral hallucination and mind acting 
 upon itself, and so producing fantasies. 
 
 "I have read this account to Dr. Ashburner, and he thinks that the above 
 facts plainly show — First, unseen intelligence; secondly, the benevolence of 
 that intelligence — for the table must have been raised at least four feet off 
 the ground to pass over the head of Mr. Squire without hurting him; thirdly, 
 great power, in conjunction with intelligence, in overcoming Mr. Newton's 
 resistance — raising the table off the floor, and gently resting it on the heads 
 of those who were standing. The height the table was lifted must have been 
 at least six feet.* I am, &c., 
 
 Peckham, July 20, 1860." JOHN JONES. 
 
 The Paris correspondent of the New York World also states that 
 he has witnessed these manifestations of Mr. Squire, and endorses 
 the truth of the above statement. 
 
 Now these testimonies which I have read to you, prove the exist- 
 ence of a spirit power that moves tables, grasps people, and unfastens 
 brooches. These manifestations have occurred not only in Europe, 
 
 *We have received a letter from Dr. Ashburner which confirms the foregoing account of Mr. 
 Jones. Dr. A. enclosed a description of the table, by Mr. Burton, the maker of it, furnished to 
 him on application by the owner. In this description the weight of the table is given as 
 seventy-two pounds, — Bditor of London Spibitdal Maqazinb. 
 
52 MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 in London and in Paris, but also in our own country. We have seen 
 six or seven hands at once come out of the box in which the Daven- 
 port boys were, one of which hands was that of a negro. We do 
 not think that our friend demonstrated these manifestations of the 
 Davenport boys to be an imposture. The fact that he had strength 
 enough to pull the trumpet away does not prove that there was no 
 spirit force at the other end of the trumpet. It only proves that his 
 force was the greatest, as the lady remarked to him. And as to his 
 remark about the greasy appearance of the apperture in the box — is 
 it any stretch of the imagination to believe that if a hand could be 
 made from the elements of the tttmosphere, that it should also be a 
 greasy hand ? It should be understood that the Davenport boys do 
 not claim that the hands which appear in their demonstrations belong 
 to a spiritual body, but that they are formed, by spiritual influences, 
 from the elements of the atmosphere ; and why should not such a 
 hand be greasy ? Then some weight should be given to the assertion 
 that the hands of people who were endeavoring to seize the spirits 
 had often been drawn into this aperture, and that thus it had become 
 soiled. He finds great fault with the conditions, and he would lay 
 great stress upon the fact that one of the boys was tied by a Spiritu- 
 alist. Now does any one suppose that any Spirititualist in Chicago 
 or in Decatur, or any where else, would aid these boys in a wicked 
 and evil cheat ? I have tied one of these boys, and covered him all 
 over with cords, and in three minutes after the light was put out 
 he would be found untied. Sometimes I have seen them tied in 
 their shirt sleeves, and their coat placed in the box, and in three 
 minutes they would be found with their coats on and the ropes tied 
 over their arms, outside the coat, as before. My testimony as to 
 these facts is as admissable as that of any other man, and these are 
 the facts. The idea that the boys were assisted to cheat by the 
 Spiritualists is a slur upon that body as a class, which will be sure to 
 be resented. 
 
 My opponent believes all these manifestations to be impostures. 
 We believe them to be true. The London transactions he may at- 
 tempt to dispute — ^but there they are, published in a London paper. 
 He says these manifestations should be produced here. I think that 
 the testimony of the witnesses themselves is amply sufficient to satisfy 
 any honest mind of the truth. 
 
 Because we cannot produce these manifestations here, are we to be 
 told that is proof they never have occurred ? Spirits do not care for 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 53 
 
 the applause of tlie world, and for the assertion of this or that man, 
 that if you will do this or that thing, he will he converted to the 
 belief in Spiritualism. I do not know that it would he advisable for 
 my opponent to be converted just now. But if we can awaken men 
 to investigation, it is all we ask. Spiritualism can stand alone in its 
 own strength, glorious as Heaven, endless as Earth in its constant 
 recurrence of spring, siunmer, autumn and winter. If these mani- 
 festations could occur at all times, they might thereby be proved to 
 be impostures. But the mediums cannot control these conditions. 
 Is this a proof of imposture ?.. If they were impostures, they could 
 produce these manifestations at any and all times. It is not so — for 
 often they fail to get any manifestations. Why? Because the spirit 
 does not, cannot, or will not make itself manifest. It is wonder- 
 ful, for example, that the spirits which influence the Davenport 
 boys, could, under the adverse circumstances which Mr. Jones has 
 described, gain force enough to make any manifestations at all. The 
 Davenport boys have encountered much persecution, and have, at 
 times, been obliged to defend themselves, with physical weapons, , 
 
 against the evil and cowardly assaults of their enemies. | 
 
 Here Mr. "Whiting's time expired. ^ 
 
 MR. JONES' SIXTH ARGUMENT. 
 
 Mr. Jones said — 
 
 My opponent, in conducting his side of this discussion, has per- 
 sisted again in introducing evidence that is wholly irrelevant to the 
 present case. I must continue to insist, that every subject is to be 
 proved, if proved at all, by evidence that relates to the subject. 
 Every physical fact must be proved by physical evidence; every natu- 
 ral fact by natural evidence ; every moral fact by moral evidence. 
 My friend has brought up, as his witnesses, these distant persons, 
 who all declare, just as determinedly as he himself does, that the 
 origin of spiritual manifestations is not at all hypothetical, but very 
 certain. But it is also a postulate well established in law and in rea- 
 son, that persons who are witnesses in their own behalf shall be ruled 
 out of court. My friend begs the question. He assumes the nega- 
 tive of the resolution in question, and then goes on to prove that 
 negative by the testimony of men who are just as reliable, and no 
 
54 MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 more so, than he is ; and I wisli to say that I would just as soon take 
 his 'ipse dixit as that of any of the persons whom he has introduced 
 or whom he may introduce here. But no man may be a witness in 
 his own case. My opponent is bound to show that these manifesta- 
 tions are to be accounted for on other principles than those which we 
 advance. No matter how many witnesses he may bring forward here, 
 who will testify that they have witnessed these manifestations, it 
 would be no evidence to us of the origin of them. The Spiritualists 
 admit this. They say, that what is evidence to one mind is not evi- 
 dence to another; but eternal truth states, that what is evidence to 
 one is evidence to every one — provided the evidence be appropriate 
 to the thing to be proven. I have shown that some of the so-called 
 spiritual communications are plagarisms from well-known writers; 
 and I have proved the exceedingly trifling and foolish character of 
 the manifestations. From this 1 contend that their origin is exceed- 
 ingly hypothetical. Now, I do not wish to overthrow this doctrine 
 of spiritual communion with the dead, if the thing is true. Would 
 to Grod that I could commune with the spirits of my beloved ones, 
 who have passed on before me. But when they tell me that I can do 
 so, and then mock me as they hate done, I say that this sort of evi- 
 dence will never convince me. 
 
 But as to this spiritual poetry. I presume that this audience ob- 
 served that my friend said nothing of the hymn stolen from the 
 "Baptist Hymn Book," and palmed oflF as a spiritual communication, 
 made through the organism of a girl, thirteen years' old, who could 
 neither read or write ! What kind of spirits were they who gave 
 this as an original spiritual production ? When you prove that per- 
 sons steal the property of others, and pass it off as their own, you 
 have prima facia evidence of imposture and fraud. My friend 
 sneaked out of the matter of Prof. Felton's letter in a very ingenious 
 way. I should not have alluded to this matter at all, had he not 
 stated that he could produce the public statements of Prof. Felton 
 endorsing the originality and beauty of his improvised poems — you 
 must take Mr. Whiting's word for that. But Prof. Felton says, that 
 this is one of the most wicked of impostures. Yet Mr. Whiting 
 sought to create the impression on your mind, that Prof. Felton patro- ■ 
 nized and applauded him, and threw his mantle over him. Now, he 
 says, that in the manner of manifestations the medium cannot avoid 
 displaying the peculiar idiosyncracies of the spirit which is control- 
 ling him. The medium cannot control the soirit, but is controlled 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 55 
 
 by it. Thus wlien Pat. Murphy came upon the stand, it was nothing 
 to my friend that he talked with an Irish brogue, and concerning 
 those things of which his mind had been occupied when on earth. 
 Oh, yes ! said he, Mrs. Conant was a very respectable lady, above the 
 suspicion of collusion or deceit, and she was controlled by the spirit 
 of this wild Irishman. If this be true, then why does not the spirit 
 of the Italian poet, which controls my friend, throw the Italian into 
 him ? He states that he will improvise an Italian poem; but delivers 
 the poem in English, and states that he can only do the Italian in 
 private ! The truth is, that President Felton is an illustrious scholar 
 — the President of Harvard College — a man who understood the 
 Italian language, and could tell, in a moment, whether Whiting was 
 improvising Italian or gibberish. I have not much knowledge of 
 Italian ; but if my friend will improvise a few sentences of Italian 
 poetry here, when the conditions are all right, I will report on it. If 
 he does so, I will not consider it as an evidence that spiritual mani- 
 festations are not hypothetical in their character ; but I will take it 
 as an evidence that my friend understands Italian. He says, that this 
 spirit of an Italian poet controls him. But I observe that he can 
 control the spirit of the Italian poet so much, that whenever it is 
 necessary he can open his eyes and read letters and extracts pertain- 
 ing to this debate. This is very extraordinary; and it is strange that, 
 with this control over his Italian friend, he cannot give us some evi- 
 dence of the influence of this poet over him. Our spiritualistic 
 friends in the audience say, that they know my opponent is thus influ 
 enced and controled ; but we care not for their say so. It cannot be 
 proven to be true simply by saying that some one else says so too. 
 
 I should observe here, that a preposterous position has been takes, 
 by our opponent, and is always taken by Spiritualists in their discus 
 sions. It is this : We work our wonders, say they ; you cannot prove 
 where they come from : therefore, we say, they come from spirits; and 
 if you cannot prove the contrary, you must believe us. But this is 
 an extraordinary jump of logic. I have actually received as much 
 intelligence from an educated pig as from any Spiritualist I have ever 
 met with. I have seen an educated pig told to point out the age of 
 this gentleman or that lady, and the pig has turned up the card with 
 the right number of years upon it, every time. Oh, how wonderful 
 that is ! we exclaim. Why not conclude that this was done by spirit 
 power ? Perhaps you will tell me it was. I cannot prove it was not; 
 but are we, therefore, to jump at the infallible conclusion that it was? 
 
6B MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 There are thousands of things of which we know but very little, and 
 concerning which, if we jumped at conclusions as you seem inclined 
 here to do, we should be led into constant error. Sir Benjamin Bro- 
 die once very ingeniously tested this inclination of some minds to 
 jump from a fact to an inference. A Mr. Perkins made a tractor 
 with which to cure rheumatism. He exhibited it to a patient long 
 afflicted with that complaint, bade him look steadfastly upon it, and 
 he was cured. No one denies that. Sir Benjamin Brodie did not 
 deny it. He did not deny the fact, but he denied the inference ; and 
 to prove the fallacy of it, he made a tractor of wood, and painted it 
 so that it exactly resembled tho metallic tractor made by Perkins. 
 He took it to the hospital; found a patient with the rheumatism; in- 
 formed him that it was the tractor that had cured Perkins' patient, 
 and told him to look steadfastly upon it. The lame man obeyed, and 
 arose from his bed cured. Would it not be preposterous for me now, 
 because I cannot explain how that cure was effected, to jump at the 
 conclusion that it was done by supernatural causes ? Every impos- 
 tor, when he is about to commit a fraud, studies the points upon which 
 he may be detected and exposed. He guards these points ; he hedges 
 himself up against attack from these quarters, and then says, I can 
 do things that you cannot explain — and, therefore, you must admit 
 they jDroceed from spiritual causes. 
 
 I have some delightful spiritual intelligence to impart to you, which 
 came to me last week. I desire my friend to give his attention to the 
 necessity of producing proper and appropriate evidence to sustain his 
 side of the debate, or else of giving up the debate. I wish him not 
 to attempt to cheat us by the sophism, that because we cannot account 
 for these manifestations, therefore they must of necessity be of a spir- 
 itual origin. Wizard Jacobs and Anderson and Blitz do many things, 
 for which we cannot account, and which we cannot explain; but 
 when I witnessed these things, instead of jumping at the conclusion 
 that they were of spiritual origin, I asked myself, how are these things 
 done ? Had I been disposed to receptivity, as my friend calls it, I 
 might have received some wonderful communications from the spirits; 
 but bearing in mind that many tricksters have defied the world to 
 explain and account for their wonderful works, it does not become us 
 to prove that these so-called spiritual manifestations do not come from 
 spirits; but it remains for him to prove that they do. 
 
 Here Mr. Jones' time expired. 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 57 
 
 MR. WHITING'S SIXTH REPLICATION. 
 
 Mr. Whiting said: 
 
 In the first place, I wish to settle finally these allusions to Presi- 
 dent Felton. I will again state that the letter which Mr. Jones has 
 read was written by President Felton in August, 1859, and is in 
 regard to Spiritualism generally. In it I am only mentioned inci- 
 dentally. In the winter of 1858, I had several investigations with 
 the Faculty of Harvard College. There were present at these inves- 
 tigations very large audiences. President Felton, at this time, said 
 that even sh®uld I improvise a poem in Italian, it would be no evi- 
 dence that I was influenced by the spirit of a deceased Italian poet. 
 This was one reason assigned at the time for not giving the Italian 
 improvisation in public. Another reason was that very few persons in 
 the audience understood Italian, and a poem recited in that language 
 would be uninteresting to them. But I wish to call upon a gentle- 
 man who was present at these investigations, and who is here to-night, 
 to state just what President Felton did then say concerning me. 
 
 Mr. Loud, a gentleman residing at Decatur, and the Principal of 
 the Public School there, here arose and stated that what Mr. Whiting 
 had said in reference to President Felton was strictly true; that he, 
 Mr. Loud, was present at the meetings which Mr. Whiting had with 
 the Harvard Professors; that President Felton paid the highest com- 
 pliments to Mr. Whiting, saying that the poem which he had recited 
 was original and beautiful, and that he, Felton, had himself selected 
 the subject. President Felton said that there was nothing superior 
 to the language and sentiment of this poem in the writings of Plato 
 or Socrates — and indeed, gave to Mr. Whiting as high a compHment 
 as could be imagined. 
 
 Mr. Whiting continued : 
 
 I will now resume the discussion where I left off — and this was 
 where we were considering the question of plagarized poetry. I had 
 brought forward that splendid and beautiful poem inspired by the 
 spirit of Edgar Allan Poe, as an evidence of the truth of spiritual 
 communion. In order to rebut this evidence, my friend shows that 
 a girl plagarized a hymn from a Baptist Hymn Book — a girl too, who 
 could neither read or write ! That is something singular on the face 
 of it. My friend read the entire hymn from the hymn book, but 
 only one verse of the hymn said to have been written by the servant 
 girl who could neither read or write. I never heard of this alleged 
 
58 MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 plagarism before, but I will not attempt to dispute it. But admitting 
 it, does it prove that tbe poem wbich I have read does not come from 
 the spirit of Poe ? Does it prove that the various spiritual manifes- 
 tations which we have mentioned here, do not bear on themselves the 
 mark of spirit origin ? My friend still lays stress upon the necessity 
 of producing spiritual manifestations in your presence; and sets aside 
 all the positive and uncontradicted evidence I have produced. But 
 will that set it aside in your mind ? Then my friend goes on, very 
 much in the style and language of Prof. Grrimes, to lead you to the 
 idea that no evidence has been produced, and that tests must be 
 made by spirits here and now. The character of the argument my 
 opponent has followed, seems as if he wanted to make it appear that 
 because the manifestations did not occur here, the whole theory and 
 system of Spiritualism was an imposture. But evidence that is good 
 at all, is as good when it comes from a distance as when it is pro- 
 duced at home. The question we are debating is the origin of these 
 manifestations. How can we conduct a debate without argument; 
 how can we argue unless we produce evidence to argue upon ? But, 
 exclaims my friend, if I will not do that which I have never claimed 
 to be able to do, I must give up the debate ! Why ? Because he 
 rejects the evidence which I have produced here. But we have 
 brought here the very best evidence — the evidence of witnesses who 
 cannot be impeached — which carries with it the weight of learning, 
 of judicial lore, of social standing and position. My friend says 
 that if he was a little more versed in literature, he could discover the 
 source from which all the alleged spiritual poetry has been stolen. 
 Now President Felton is a profoundly learned man, and he admitted 
 the entire originality of the poem improvised under spirit influence 
 by your speaker. How does it happen that the learned men of 
 Europe, whose knowledge of literature, both ancient and modern, is 
 exhaustive, are gulled by these mediums ? No ! It is these men, 
 who can look into the lore of the past, and who are conversant with 
 the learning of the present day, who become Spiritualists. It is those 
 who have read of Socrates and his demon ; of Pluto and his angels ; 
 of the Poems of Hesiod; of Philo Judeas, who declared that the 
 angels of the Jews were the Heroes of the Grecians, and that the air- 
 is full of angels, who are the spirits of human beings ; it is these 
 men who acknowledge the truth of Spiritualism; it is these men, who 
 have the best means of detecting plagarism and imposture, who ac- 
 knowledge the originality and the truth of spiritual communication. 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 59 
 
 If this charge of fraud is true, why has not the system of Spiritualism 
 long since been exploded ? Why has it spread with such astonishing 
 rapidity within the last twelve years ? Why has it made its way into 
 every city, and every village and hamlet in the land ? Why do we 
 find these learned, candid and scientific men avowing their firm belief 
 in its truth ? There is Robert Dale Owen, late United States Min- 
 ister to Naples, for many years a prominent pubHc man in our neigh- 
 boring State of Indiana, and the son of the great philosopher and 
 author, Robert Owen — he has lately published a book entitled 
 '■'Footfalls upon the Boundery of another World," filled with nara- 
 tives of modern spiritual manifestations, extending back for a period 
 of two hundred years. In this book he declares his belief in the 
 spiritual origin of the manifestations which we are now discussing. 
 Is such evidence as this worth nothing ? In this book Mr. Owen 
 gives us a lengthy account of the apparition of the Drummer at Ted- 
 worth, and says that this has never been accounted for on any other 
 hypothesis than that of spiritual origin. 
 
 While on the subject of evidence, we may as well exhaust the sub- 
 ject at once. We difier with our opponent in regard to our views of 
 evidence. We shall leave each individual to decide for himself what 
 convincing evidence is. The subject is not to be left to the decision 
 of any committee, or to a vote of the audience. I shall leave it to 
 the candid utterance of every unprejudiced heart to decide for itself 
 what is sufficient to convince it. I never have set up any claim to be 
 able to produce test manifestations of the truth of Spiritualism, and 
 to give convincing proof thereof. I have informed my opponent of 
 this fact before this debate. He continually sneers at the idea that 
 certain conditions are pre-requisite to be observed before the mani- 
 festations can occur, and at the supposition that he is not receptive. 
 He says that he has investigated the subject to some extent; and 
 this morning he said he was convinced that the claims of Spiritualism 
 were false. Now he says, would to Grod that the thing was true ! He 
 shows some signs of conversion. If he continues his investigations, 
 notwithstanding the obstacles and temptations which are in his way, 
 he will become converted ; but even for the sake of converting him, 
 I will not try to produce here forms of manifestations, which I have 
 never claimed to be able to produce. Is not the evidence I have 
 already given conclusive ? I have given names, dates, persons and 
 places ; and this evidence is what these witnesses believe to be true, 
 and what they have seen. We might quote many miracles of healing. 
 
60 MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 Who knows the influence of mind upon mind ? These cures of heal- 
 ing are performed through some law of which we are yet ignorant ; 
 but one thing we know, that no one can be cured of a real disease by 
 the power of imagination alone. Your speaker's own case is an illus- 
 tration of the value of spiritual communication, as applied to physical 
 health. For many years before I became a Spiritualist, I suffered from 
 disease and pain ; but since I have followed the impressions in regard 
 to my health, which my spiritual guides have given me, I have been 
 a model of health. This was a cure performed by no medicine, but 
 by the effect of subtle influences brought to bear upon me. This 
 would have been called a miracle in olden times. As we proceed in 
 this discussion, we shall quote many cases of healing by the laying on 
 of hands ; of others, by the prescription of certain roots and herbs, 
 which were unknown to the healing medium until revealed by the 
 spirit directing him. Dr. Slade has performed many wonderful cures. 
 He is a man of no medical education, but is influenced by the spirit 
 of an Indian medicine man. He has cured his patients in every in- 
 stance ; and those who know and can testify of these things, live all 
 along the road from Detroit to Chicago. Of portraits painted by 
 spirit hands, the evidences are abundant. One that I have is the por- 
 trait of a venerable Persian, and was drawn in forty minutes. An- 
 other that I have is of a man of Italian visage and of dark complexion, 
 wearing a painted cape, and encircled with a wreath of leaves and 
 flowers. It was executed in two hours ; and an artist told me that it 
 would require the best painter two hours to make the eyes alone of 
 that portrait; yet the whole portrait was done in two hours — more 
 quickly than any human hand could do it. Mr. Lewis Bascombe, of 
 Jackson, has a portrait of his deceased child, painted by the spirits, 
 and a perfect likeness ; Mr. Wood, of Jackson, has the portraits of 
 two of his children ; and Mr. Anderson, the artist-medium who drew 
 these pictures, never saw the parties whose portraits they were. 
 These things demonstrate their own truth, and are the living evi- 
 dences of Spiritualism. Among the portraits thus painted by spirit 
 hands, are those of the father and mother of Mr. Cathcart, before 
 alluded to. They have both been dead forty years, and Rogers, the 
 medium artist, was only twenty-eight years old, and no portrait or 
 daguerreotype of the deceased persons was left behind them ; yet so 
 perfect was the likenesses, that they were at once recognized. John 
 W. Armstrong, of Laporte, has his wife's father's portrait; and he died 
 leaving neither a portrait or a daguerreotype ; and yet his son recog- 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 61 
 
 nized the spirit portrait as a perfect likeness. Who else could paint 
 these portraits of departed ones but invisible spirits ? Mr. Walcott, 
 of Columbus, Ohio, has, under spiritual influence, drawn about one 
 hundred portraits of departed ones. Mr. Seth Henshaw, of Greens- 
 boro, Indiana, has fifteen of these portraits. Mr. Henshaw never saw 
 Mr. Walcott : he simply determines what portrait he wishes to obtain, 
 writes to Mr. Walcott, and obtains it. He has hkenesses of nearly 
 all his deceased relatives and friends, and their perfect accuracy is 
 attested by many. He has also a representation of himself as he 
 would appear in his coffin ; and yet the artist whose hand drew the 
 picture never saw him. Now, my friend may say, Oh, we don't know 
 that these people exist at all. But there these pictures are, and they 
 speak to that sentimentality of the human soul, of which our friend 
 has told us, and breathe a language which no ridicule can destroy, 
 and afi"ord an evidence of the truth of Spiritualism which every candid 
 mind must accept. 
 
 Here Mr. Whiting's time expired. 
 
 MR. JONES' SEVENTH ARGUMENT. 
 
 Mr. Jones said — 
 
 I must first ask Mr. Loud, the gentleman called as a witness by my 
 friend, if his sympathies are with the Spiritualists ? 
 
 Mr. Loud replied, that he scarcely knew how to reply to that ques- 
 tion. He did not know that his sympathies were much enlisted ; but 
 he had no prejudices against Spiritualism. 
 
 Mr. Jones then asked Lawyer Cole, who was one of the audience, 
 if it was not a postulate in law, that every case must be proved by its 
 own appropriate evidence, and that no party can testify in his own 
 behalf? To which questions Mr. Cole returned an affirmative response. 
 
 Mr. Jones then proceeded — 
 
 I beg to thank my friend for his congratulations upon my approach- 
 ing conversion to Spiritualism. He beautifully illustrates the declaration 
 of the poet — 
 
 "Hope springs immortal in the human breast, 
 Man never is, but always to be blest," 
 
 So it will prove, I fear, in regard to the hopes of my friend. I have 
 not yet arrived at the goal of conversion, and the probabilities are 
 
62 MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 against my ever doing so. I have often been told that I am an im- 
 pressionable medium, and that if I wished it I would make an excel- 
 lent medium. I have not contradicted this. Hope springs immortal 
 in the human breast. There is a good time coming; wait a little 
 longer ! 
 
 My friend declares, that although I proved that a poem stolen from 
 a Baptist hymn book was palmed off as an improvisation by spirit 
 influence through the organism of a servant girl who could not read or 
 write, I have not proved that the poem he read did not come, as he 
 claims it did, from the spirit of Edgar Allan Poe. I think I did 
 prove this by probable evidence. I have no positive means of know- 
 ing it, but I believe it. Making the admission that the hymn in 
 question was stolen from the hymn book, and then palmed off by Spir- 
 itualists as a spiritual production, is fatal to their case. They admit 
 that they have stolen from Tucker, and the probability is that the 
 poem alleged to be Poe's is stolen also. And I should here remark, 
 that it was not I, but the Spiritualists, who declared that this impro- 
 vising servant girl could neither read or write. The fact that I have 
 shown one plagarism, should prove my position as to the exceedingly 
 hypothetical nature of these manifestations. 
 
 Now, as to witnesses. We have the evidence of legal gentlemen 
 that my positions are correct : that to prove any case, you must pro- 
 duce appropriate evidence ; and that witnesses cannot testify in their 
 own behalf. We have, thus far, had nothing offered us on the nega- 
 tive side of this debate but human testimony — very good in its way, 
 perhaps, but not satisfactory and conclusive. Then all the witnesses 
 my friend has called, were witnesses in their own behalf; and this 
 fact would rule all their evidence out of any court, and I believe this 
 audience will concur in this decision. Any imposture in the world 
 can be proved to be true, if you allow its own advocates to testify in 
 its behalf; any imposture, I say, and I call this spiritualism an impos- 
 ture, and have endeavored to prove it so. In the very depth of my 
 soul, I believe it to be the most gross imposture ever attempted to be 
 played off upon poor humanity ; and I shall continue to prove it to 
 be so to the end of this debate. I call on my spiritualistic friends 
 to prove their system not tf be an imposture. They prove it by a 
 whole host of persons — four millions of people, say they, will swear 
 to the same thing ; and any imposture under heaven can be proved in 
 this way, by allowing its dupes tt swear to its truth. Robert Dale 
 Owen's book is in my library, anif my one can read it who wants to, as 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 63 
 
 they can also any other of the five hundred volumes I have. This 
 book is filled with the most horrible ghost stories, which will make 
 your hairs — like those of Hamlet when he beheld his father's spirit — 
 to stand on end like quills upon the fretful porcupine. If you set up 
 reading this book till twelve o'clock at night, you will not sleep any 
 for horror the next day. Now, we used to have a man around here 
 — Edward Hill by name — who could tell just as good a yarn as any 
 that are told in Owen's book. Now, suppose you went to Hill and 
 said to him, "Here, you have told such and such a story, and it is 
 not true.'' " Well," he might reply, "I did tell it, and it is true, and 
 I can bring a man to swear to it." Would that prove it ? 
 
 Now, as to the internal evidences of Spiritualism. We spoke of 
 the so-called "spiritual philosophy." I charge you by high Heaven 
 not to forget these words, " spiritual philosophy !" I have here a book, 
 written by Dr. Gordon, a pastor of the Dutch Reformed Church, 
 entitled " A Threefold Test of Modern Spiritualism." We will see 
 how much of philosophy there is in this spiritualism — how nicely the 
 revelations which it gives us agree with each other. My friend tells 
 me that if I continue my investigations I will reach the goal of con- 
 version to Spiritualism. Dr. Gordon tried eleven times, and he is still 
 a minister. I read first from page 101 of his book : 
 
 "DR. GORDON'S SIXTH SITTING. 
 
 "January 5th, 1856. — Called upon Mrs. C, a medium who has been before 
 the public for six years, and has gained the reputation of being one of the 
 very best test mediums. I asked for the best test, and she also specified that 
 of asking questions mentally. I wished to confine myself to subjects, which, 
 in the nature of the case, spirits ought to know, and had prepared a list. 
 This medium informed me, that they could certainly answer whatever ques- 
 tions related to spiritual matters. I then took my seat at the table, wrote 
 down the names of my friends who had left the form, and as before related, 
 the spirit declared himself to be that of my maternal grandfather. To him I 
 put the following questions : 
 
 " 1. Are you acquainted with the matter of Judge Edmonds' publication on 
 Spiritualism? Yes. 
 
 "2. Do you know as much as Judge Edmonds does? Yes. 
 
 " 3. Is he sincere? Indefinite. 
 
 " 4. Is he deluded? Yes. 
 
 " 5. Are his books worthless? No. 
 
 " 6. Can Spiritualism enable one to know the thoughts of others? Yes. 
 
 " 7. Are not the thoughts of every one known to God alone? Yes. 
 
 " 8. Are not the pretensions of Spiritualism false ? No. 
 
 "9. Is it impossible for Spiritualism to demonstrate immortality in any 
 way ? No. 
 
 " 10. Is it impossible to demonstrate it by an appeal to the senses? Yes. 
 
 "11. Is it impossible for the spirits of our departed friends to communicate 
 with us whom they have left behind? Yes. 
 
 "12. Is it impossible for them to labor for our redemption from sin? Yes. 
 
 "13. Must all redemption come through it? No. 
 
64 MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 "14. Are not the pretensions of Spiritualism as to curing the sick, lame 
 and blind, false ? Indefinite. 
 
 "15. Can Spiritualism make man realize what wiU be his condition in 
 another world ? Yes. 
 
 "16. Is it not impossible for man to do this by all that Spiritualism can do? 
 Indefinite. 
 
 "17. Are angels an order of beings distinct from the souls of men? Yes. 
 
 "18. Does Spiritualism lead to hypocrisy? Yes. 
 
 "19. Does it prevent hypocrisy? Yes. 
 
 "20. Does it lead to crime? Yes. 
 
 "21. Does it deter from crime? No. 
 
 "22. Does it recognize Pantheism? No. 
 
 "23. Does it assert, without proving, the immortality of the soul? No. 
 
 "24. Does it release man from responsibility to God? Yes. 
 
 "25. Are the most essential claims made by Judge Edmonds in behalf of 
 Spiritualism false? Yes. 
 
 "26. Can I become a medium? No. 
 
 "27. In what sphere are you now? In the sixth sphere. 
 
 "28. How long since you left the form? Ninety years ago. My mother 
 has just completed her seventy -ninth year. 
 
 "29. Did you die in England? No. In Scotland? No. In Ireland? No. 
 In France? Yes. — Untrue." — Gordon's Threefold Test, pp. 101, 2, 3. 
 
 Then I read from page 113 — 
 
 "TENTH SITTING. 
 
 "April 20th. — Visited the medium, Mr. Conkling, and occupied an hour in 
 the prosecution of my design. When I took my seat at the table, after a 
 short time a spirit announced itself. I took slips of paper, and wrote father 
 upon one, folding it up ; grandfather upon another, and friend upon another. 
 The spirit rapped, denoting that he was a friend and not a relation. I re- 
 membered that I had this morning wished my friend G. to announce himself, 
 and, therefore, wrote his name privately ; but before I had finished it, the 
 table made a tumultuous noise, jostling itself out of place, to assure me of the 
 presence of my friend. Rev. G. I. G. The paper on which I wrote his name 
 I put in my pocket. My first questions were speculative, previously prepared, 
 and put mentally as follows: 
 
 "Do you belong to one of the higher spheres? Yes, the sixth. 
 
 "Are you able to enlighten me on theological and spiritual facts and 
 doctrines? Yes. 
 
 "Are the scriptures unworthy of reliance ? Yes. 
 
 "Were their reputed authors fictitious characters? No. 
 
 "Were they real characters? Yes. 
 
 "Is the doctrine of plenary inspiration of the Bible true? No. 
 
 "Is it false doctrine ? Yes. 
 
 "Are the scriptures a guide superior to reason ? Yes. 
 
 " Are the scriptures a guide inferior to reason ? Yes. 
 
 "Were the manifestations of heathen mythology of the same origin as those 
 of modern spiritualism ? Yes. . 
 
 "Were they truly from the spirit world? Yes. 
 
 "Are the manifestations of ancient heathen oracles and of modern spiritu- 
 alism alike referable to Demonology ? Yes. 
 
 "Is Demonology a mass of fiction? Yes. 
 
 "Is the river Styx a reality ? Yes. 
 
 "Is the river Lethe a reality? Yes. 
 
 "Is Charon a real personage? Yes. 
 
 "Was the religion of the ancient Egyptians superior to that of the Hebrews? 
 Yes. 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 65 
 
 "Is God the soul of the universe ? A tumultuous Yes. 
 "Does he bear the same relation to it as the human soul bears to the human 
 body ? A tumultuous Yes. 
 
 "Has God a body like that of man? Yes. 
 
 "Is he the essence of matter? A tumultuous Yes. 
 
 "Is the individuality of God a fiction ? A tumultuous Yes. 
 
 "Is the unity of God a fiction? Yes. 
 
 "Is plurality in God a fiction? Yes. 
 
 "Is the trinity a fundamental eiTor ? Yes. 
 
 "Is the trinity a fundamental truth? Yes. 
 
 "Is Christ an unreal being? Yes. 
 
 "Is Christ a real being ? Yes. 
 
 "Is Christ God and man united ? Yes. 
 
 "Is Christ's nature truly taught in the scriptures? No. 
 
 "Do you believe in the decrees of God ! Yes. 
 
 "Are the decrees of God fictitious? Yes. 
 
 "Is the Bible account of creation false ? Yes. 
 
 "Is the Bible account of creation true ? Yes." 
 
 Now I wish to give you some revelations vrliicli I Lad in my own 
 person. I waited upon the renowned test medium, Miss Ada Hoyt, 
 at the recommendation of my friend, in Chicago, on Friday morning 
 last. She directed me to sit down at the table and write the names 
 of the persons from whom I desired communications, on slips of paper. 
 I thus wrote the name of my mother, my sister, my aunt and my 
 father. I wrote the maiden name of my mother and my sister, my 
 aunt's married name and the sir-name of my father. Miss Hoyt then 
 sat down at the table, and, picking up one of the ballots — which were 
 folded tightly — asked, '"Is the spirit of this one here?" Three raps 
 were instantly heard, signifying yes. Seizing a pencil. Miss Hoyt 
 then wrote backwards the name of Ann Clough, which was the name 
 upon the ballot, and the maiden name of my mother. '-Are you the 
 spirit of my mother?" I asked. Three raps was the reply. '-Where 
 did you die ?" A number of places were written down, and the raps 
 indicated that the place of her decease was Paris. "At what age did 
 you die ?" A number of figures were written down, and sixty-nine 
 years was designated as the age. The disease which caused her death 
 was in like manner stated to be pneumonia, and the year of her death, 
 1857. I then asked, -'In what sphere are you now?" "In the 
 fifth," was the reply. Thinks I, how could you know I wanted to 
 have a communication from a spirit in the fifth sphere ? "Is Spirit- 
 ualism a humbug ?" I asked. "Yes," was the reply. "Is there a 
 hell?" "Yes." "Is hell a fable?" No answer. "Am I doing 
 right in exposing the humbug of Spiritualism?" "Yes," was the 
 reply. 
 
 Here Mr. Jones' time expired. 
 5 
 
66 MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 MR. WHITING'S SEVENTH REPLICATION. 
 
 Mr. Whiting said — 
 
 I now propose to read a well authenticated statement of the cures 
 performed by spiritual agency through Dr. J. R. Newton, who was 
 a merchant of Cincinnati, engaged in a lucrative business, but who 
 gave up that occupation at the command of the spirits, and devoted 
 himself to the performance of these cures. This statement is as 
 follows : 
 
 "CURES BY DR. NEWTON. 
 
 "Editors of the Bannek of Light: Some weeks since, I gave a brief 
 statement in your columns of remarlsable cases of disease cured througli tlie 
 instrumentality of Dr. J. R. Newton, at No. 40 Edinboro' street, corner of 
 Beach street, in this city. Since that time I have received very many letters 
 of inquiry from all sections of the country, asking for information in regard 
 to his powers and his ability to. cure the various forms of disease to which 
 flesh is heir. I therefore take this time to fulfill my promise to furnish a few 
 of the vast number of wonderful cures performed by Dr. N. since his resi- 
 dence in Boston, and to answer my numerous correspondents (presuming that 
 they all take a,nd pay for the Banner), and thus save myself much time and 
 trouble, which would be necessary to answer each individual addressing me. 
 These cases can be referred to by those who are skeptical. 
 
 "Dr. Newton informs me, that the class of cases in which he has the most 
 universal success, are those known under the general head of Female Com- 
 plaints, which, in the most aggravated forms, are cured almost universally ; 
 but all will perceive that the patients, from motives of delicacy, do not like to 
 have them published. He is also remarkably successful in Paralysis, Rheum- 
 atism, Blindness, Deafness, Contracted Muscles, Spinal Curvature, Hip Disease, 
 Tumors, Chorea or St. Vitus Dance, and Enlargement of the Joints; but he 
 makes no pretension of being able to cure all who apjily. 
 
 "The following are some of the many cures which have lately been effected: 
 
 "Miss Julia Estabrook, of Brooklyn, N. Y., came on Thursday last with a 
 withered limb and two crutches. Restored in thirty minutes, and walked to 
 her boarding place without crutches. 
 
 "Mrs. Esther Davis, from Warner, N. H., could walk but little, and had 
 been a mute for seven years. After the first operation, walked over a mile 
 and spoke for the first time ; a letter since received with her miniature, ex- 
 presses her thanks that she is enabled to talk with her family, and general 
 health improved. 
 
 "Hannah B. George, of Concord, had no use of her neck, knees or arms. 
 Restored by one operation. 
 
 "Mrs. A. H. Wood, of Pepperell, Mass., open cancer. After two operations 
 the cancer dropped out and is healing. 
 
 "Mrs. John Coyle, of Providence, lost the use of her left leg, which was 
 withered ; used crutches fourteen months. Cured by one operation. 
 
 "Miss Lucina Parmenter, of Lowell, had dropsy so that she was unable to 
 walk. Cured by one operation. 
 
 "Edwin Hatch, of East Boston, scrofulous humor and rheumatism ; on bed 
 six months, and then could only walk with crutches. Cured by one operation. 
 
 "Mrs. Lhedee, of No. 10 Billerica street, Boston, had withered hand, en- 
 tirely useless, caused by cancer ; a great sufferer — could not sleep for eight 
 nights. Cured by one operation. 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 67 
 
 "Miss Abby Bartlett, of Boston, could not speak eyen in a ■wiiisper for 
 eight months. Perfectly cured in ten minutes. The next day her friend, 
 Mrs. Samuel Stevens of this city — foui'teen months ■n'ithout speaking — was 
 restored in two minutes. 
 
 "Mrs. Wise, 31 Central Avenue, Chelsea, cured of cancer by one operation. 
 "Capt. Daniel Cavanaugh, Jr., of steam tow-boat, Charles Paver, had 
 cough — thought to be in consumption. Cured by one operation. Will be 
 pleased to answer any questions. 
 
 "Charles H. Lane, of Somerville, had hip complaint and rheumatism; 
 walked with cane or crutch ; after one operation walked without either. 
 
 "Mrs. Taylor, of Dorchester, was bed-ridden three years with spine disease 
 and female weakness ; had never borne any weight upon her feet during that 
 time. In thirty minutes she was enabled to walk around the room. This 
 cure was effected in the evening. She has been well ever since. Physicians 
 say tlA is the greatest cure on record. 
 
 "Mrs. Fairfield, of Dorchestei' — confined to the house many years — was 
 cui'ed on Sunday, while her husband was at church, and she walked out to 
 meet him. 
 
 "Charles Thurber, of Providence, cured of epilepsy by one operation. 
 Had spasms daily before being cured. 
 
 "Mrs. Wait, of Lynn, Mass., cured of dropsy; one operation. Weighed 
 two hundred and twenty-seven pounds ; reduced to two hundred pounds ; is 
 at work, as well as ever. 
 
 ".John Donahue, of North Bridgewater ; walked with crutches; cured by 
 one operation, and left his crutches. 
 
 "Elizabeth S. Southwick, of South Danvers; spine complaint; had not 
 walked for sixteen months ; brought in arms. After fifteen minutes' operation 
 walked two miles. 
 
 "Anna Nicholson, of 388 Hanover street, Boston; blindness from birth. 
 Cured in one operation. 
 
 "Mrs. Woodward, Lowell; spine complaint and female weakness ; could not 
 even feed herself. Cured. 
 
 "Clara A. Urann, of Boston; spine disease; had walked but a short dis- 
 tance for two years. Is perfectly restored, and enjoys better health than ever 
 before. 
 
 " The question is often asked, 'Are these cures permanent?' I answei-, 
 that, from the nature of the cases of the persons who call upon Dr. Newton 
 for relief, it cannot be expected that the cures could all be permanent, when 
 only one operation is performed ; yet, the fact that temporary relief is ob- 
 tained in those cases where all other means have been exhausted in vain, fur- 
 nishes very strong presumptive evidence that the cure will become permanent 
 by attention to the means he employs. Those who have given attention to 
 the magnetic laws which govern this method of cure, will readily perceive the 
 impossibility of any one person eifecting favorably all who are diseased. But 
 I will venture the opinion, that a parallel cannot be found in ancient or mod- 
 ern times, in sacred or profane history, where any individual has relieved 
 such large numbers of the afflicted as has Dr. N. This fact will be made ap- 
 parent to any person who Avill visit his rooms, and look at the collection of 
 crutches and canes which the cured lame have left — the spectacles the blind 
 have dispensed with, and the other surgical appliances used in spinal and 
 other complaints, which the cured have cast off", which he has as trophies of 
 his wonderful and miraculous gift of healing without medicine, or any other 
 extraneous or artiflcial aids. 
 
 "But I will conclude this already too long communication, by saying that 
 I should have fulfilled my promise to furnish reports of cases before, had not 
 it been for the fact that Dr. N. objected to anything that looked like adver- 
 tising or puffing, and it is only at the solicitation of many friends tliat he has 
 consented to the publication of these few cases. AVhat is the power by which 
 
68 MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 these "wonderful and miraculous cures are performed ? Please answer, ye 
 savans of science. 
 
 "Yours, in behalf of the suffering, 
 
 "H. F. GARDNER, M. D. 
 "Boston, Dec. 20, 1860." 
 
 These miracles contain within themselves evidence of a superior 
 and supernal power. Wherever was there a man who performed 
 such cures as these ? Dr. Newton does not do these cures for pay — 
 he heals all the poor who come unto him without pay, and leaves it 
 to those who are able and willing to pay him to contribute to his sup- 
 port. I know this of my own knowledge. It is not a lust foiSgain 
 that actuates him. He is a modest and retiring man. I heard a 
 man in Cincinnati say that Dr. Newton had a whole box full of spec- 
 tacles and crutches, which had been left with him by those whom he 
 had cured of their afflictions, and whom he had restored to sight and 
 the use of their limbs. Laying on of hands is no new mode of cure. 
 It is acknowledged to have been a part of the early Christian religion, 
 and to have always existed. These manifestations, I repeat, show a 
 power beyond man ; they are, however, but a few cases out of many. 
 My friend may say that this is no evidence ; but there it is : it has 
 never been contradicted. These persons who have been cured are not 
 fictitious persons ; their name and place of residence is given, and the 
 date of their cure. What does thie show ? That the gift of healing 
 by the laying on of hands is in the world, and that it claims to 
 be of spiritual origin. Many of the persons cured by Dr. Newton 
 were not Spiritualists : some of the testimony we have introduced 
 does not come from Spiritualists ; and if my witnesses are Spiritual- 
 ists, that does not make Spiritualism prove itself. The spirits are not 
 holding this debate. These witnesses are candid seekers after truth, 
 who are testifying to what they have seen and realized. 
 
 Have I put forth any claim to demonstrate the truth of Spiritual- 
 ism by actual manifestations? No; but simply by evidence that 
 would be received in any court of justice in the land. My friend 
 quotes from Dr. Grordon ; who he is, I know not. His testimony is 
 just as reliable as mine, and no more so. I do not know why I should 
 take his word any sooner than that of Miss Hoyt, or any one else. 
 Admitting that Dr. Gordon's interview is truthfully told, what does 
 it prove ? Either that the spirit which communicated with him was 
 a lying spirit, or else that he so influenced the medium as to cause her 
 to write down these answers. I have seen people do this, while the 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 69 
 
 spirit was endeavoring to obtain control of the medium. Beside this, 
 it is easy to conceive of contradictions where none really exist. If 
 the spirit that communicated with Dr. Gordon did say what he alleges 
 it did, it was a lying spirit : a lying spirit may say it inhabits the 
 sixth sphere as easily as it could say it lived in the first sphere. Like 
 attracts like. There is wisdom in the old adage about answering a 
 fool according to his folly. These people who come to spirit mediums 
 wishing to obtain lies, often get just what they come after. We do 
 not say that Dr. Gordon and my opponent visited these mediums de- 
 siring to obtain lying responses to their questions ; but we do say that 
 they were disposed to find what they could to prove Spiritualism false. 
 My friend says the spirits told him he was doing right in exposing 
 the humbug of Spiritualism. I say so too. I am glad to see a clergy- 
 man willing to come out and discuss the subject of Spiritualism. 
 Spiritualism being a truth, all that he, or any other man, can say 
 against it, cannot injure it; but only will redound to its credit and to 
 the comfort of its believers. Although there are good, bad and indif- 
 ferent spirits, the fact that some of them lie sometimes, does not 
 prove they don't exist. If we lie, does that prove we are not men ? 
 What made the raps that Dr. Gordon heard, and that occurred in the 
 presence of my opponent ? I hope my friend will explain that. 
 These spirits claim they are spirits, and if they are false and mis- 
 taken in any of their statements, does that prove they are non-exist- 
 ent ? The fact that an untruth is spoken does not prove that he who 
 spoke it is not a spirit. The spirit world is full of people like your- 
 selves ; and if you send so many thieves and murderers and liars into 
 the next world, as you are in the habit of doing, can you wonder that 
 some of them return and lie as they did when on earth ? All of 
 this evidence about the false statements made by spirits, does not 
 show that the origin of spirit manifestations is hypothetical. It may 
 show that there are lying spirits, or it may demonstrate the uncandid 
 and untruthful spirit of the questioner. There is no standard of be- 
 lief or unbelief among Spiritualists ; and when my friend shows the 
 existence of contradictions among the revelations of spirits, he shows 
 nothing that proves the non-existence of spirits, and nothing which 
 affects Spiritualists. They are bound by no articles of faith or creed, 
 but believe each for himself— and so do the spirits themselves. 
 
 The witnesses that my friend produces are more prejudiced than 
 mine are. Professor Matteson and Professor Grimes, we know, are 
 prejudiced, and perhaps Dr. Gordon likewise. We know the first 
 
70 MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 two ; and we speak understandingly when we say, that they are in no 
 better odor than the spiritualistic witnesses are. 
 Here Mr. Whiting's time expired. 
 
 MK. JONES' EiaHTH ARGUMENT. 
 
 Mr. Jones said — 
 
 I left off last night just as I had commenced to give an account of 
 my interview with Miss Hoyt. I left off at the point where I had 
 called up the spirit of my mother, and she had informed me that I 
 was doing right to expose the humbug of Spiritualism. Now, this is 
 an orthodox medium, according to my friend's standard. Miss Hoyt 
 is admitted to be the best test medium in the United States. She is 
 endorsed by all the Si^iritualists in Chicago and everywhere else. 
 Now I will read the full account of my interview with her : 
 
 THE RESULT OF A SITTING FOR MENTAL TESTS HAD WITH MISS 
 ADA HOYT MYSELF. 
 
 First, Ann Clough. — The spirit, by the hand of the medium, 
 wrote its name ; when the following questions were addressed, and 
 the following answers given : 
 
 1. Are you the spirit of my mother ? Three raps — Yes. 
 
 2. Where did you die ? Paris. 
 
 3. What age were you when you died ? Sixty-nine. 
 
 4. Of what disease did you die ? Pneumonia. 
 
 5. In what year did you die ? 1857. 
 
 6. In what sphere are you now ? In the fifth sphere. 
 
 7. Is Spiritualism a humbug ? Yes. 
 
 8. Is there a hell ? Yes. 
 
 9. Is hell a fable ? No answer. 
 
 10. Am I doing right in exposing the humbug of Spiritualism ? 
 Yes. 
 
 11. Is the Devil a real being ? Doubtful. 
 
 12. Is the Devil a fabulous being ? Doubtful. 
 My mother is still alive. 
 
 Next came the spirit of my aunt, jMary Simpson ; the name was 
 ■written as before, when the following were asked and answered : 
 
 1. Are you the spirit of my aunt ? Yes. 
 
 2. Where did you die ? No answer. 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 71 
 
 3. Of what disease did you die ? Disease of the heart. (False.) 
 
 4. In what town were you interred ? Sheffield. (False.) 
 
 My sister, Mary Jones, came next, and after the name was written, 
 we proposed questions and received answers in the following manner: 
 
 1. Are you the spirit of my sister? Yes. 
 
 2. Are you a personating demon, or the real spirit of Mary Jones? 
 No answer. 
 
 3. Where did you die ? No answer. 
 
 4. Of what disease did you die ? Therapeutics. (False and 
 foolish.) 
 
 5. Have you met with mother in the spheres ? Yes. (False.) 
 Here several questions were written, hut no answer came ; there- 
 fore we put the following : 
 
 6. But tell me why will you not answer my questions ; I loved 
 you dearly in the form, and, as I am an earnest and sincere inquirer, 
 you should answer me — 
 
 When the pencil was seized, and the following communication 
 written : 
 
 I cannot answer you as freely as I would wish, but will be with you 
 in all your public labors. 
 
 7. In what sphere are you now ? No answer. 
 
 8. Is Spiritualism false ? No answer. 
 
 9. Are you in heaven ? No answer. 
 
 10. Is hell a fable ? No answer. 
 
 11. In what sphere are you now ? This question was twice put, but 
 received no answer. 
 
 Now, it will be seen that many of these replies were utterly false, 
 and that some of the others were self-contradiction^ My mother is 
 living in London : we had a letter from her a very short time since, 
 as my wife, who is here present, can attest ; yet she came up at the 
 bidding of Miss Hoyt, and communed with me as a departed spirit. 
 Oh, blessed Spirituahsm ! Will we not bow down and worship this 
 new revelation ! The profession of the Spiritualists is, that when 
 communications from the spirits are written, the medium writes only 
 as she is governed ; or rather that the spirit uses the hand of the 
 medium. Now, it is very strange that 3Iary Jones and Ann Clough 
 and another, should each write precisely the same hand. Now, if 
 any one chooses to examine this paper, they will see that the writing 
 of Miss Hoyt is here ; for under each word written by the spirits, she 
 wrote the same word in her own handwriting, that I might read it 
 
72 MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 more easily ; and it is apparent that the writing of Miss Ada Hoyt is 
 very like that of Ann Clough and Mary Jones. Thus on the very 
 face of this appears a forgery. This spirit of Mary Jones tells a lie, 
 that she has seen the spirit of my mother ; and the spirit of my 
 mother tells a lie, that she died in Paris, in 1857, when she is still 
 alive. I wish to observe in this connection, that I changed my mode 
 of writing questions, when with Miss Hoyt, several times. I am 
 intimately acquainted with Prof. Grimes' work on Spiritualism ; and 
 he says that the medium, through long practice and delicate appre- 
 hension, catches the movement of the top of the pencil as the ques- 
 tions are written, and thereby understands what words are written. 
 I tried the plan of concealing the top of the pencil, and to the ques- 
 tions thus written, I received no response, or a wrong one. 
 
 The Kev. W. H. Ferris, of New York, had an interview with a 
 test medium of this kind, and I will read what he says of his 
 experience : 
 
 EXTRACT FROM AN ARTICLE, BY REV. W. H. FERRIS, IN THE 
 LADIES' REPOSITORY FOR 1856. 
 
 "I will conclude this number by a single statement of an interview I had 
 with one of the mediums in Broadway, New York, last September. * * * 
 I wrote the name of a gentleman friend, with a large family, who had been 
 dead four years, and was about fifty years of age at the time of his decease, 
 which occurred in New York City. I then enquired — 
 
 " 1. How long have you been dead ? Five years. 
 
 "2. Where did you die ? In Albany. 
 
 "8. In what State? Connecticut. 
 
 "4. Of what disease ? Fever. (This was correct.) 
 
 "5. When were you born ? 1828. 
 
 " 6. Are you male or female ? Female. 
 
 "7. Mai'ried or single ? Single. 
 
 " While I was asking these questions, the medium was anxious to know 
 whether the answers were correct. I declined informing her. I then wrote 
 a number of questions, requiring a positive affirmative or negative answer, 
 and inquired if the spirit would respond to them by my putting the pencil 
 upon them, without my stating them. The answer was Yes, Here are the 
 questions : 
 
 "1. Is spirit rapping a delusion ? Yes. 
 
 "2. Are the mediums imposters? Yes. 
 
 "3. Are the spii'its all good ? Yes. 
 
 "4. Are they spirits of devils ? No. 
 
 "5. Are they spirits of dumb animals? A very violent Yes. 
 
 " 6. Are the spirits of the dead entirely removed from this world ? Yes. 
 
 " 7. Are there any spirits ? Yes. 
 
 "8. Is Professor Brittain, editor of Spiritual Telegraph, a ghost? Yes. 
 
 " 9. Are the spirits all in hell ? Yes. 
 
 "10. Are they all spirits of devils ? Yes. 
 
 " This question was written twice by mistake and answered both ways. 
 
 " 11. Will all the medium and spirit rappers go to perdition ? Yes. 
 
 "Here she wanted to know if the answers were satisfactory. I oflFered to 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 73 
 
 read, but she did not care to hear. * * * * j paid her fifty cents and 
 retired, well satisfied -svith my experiments among the spirits." 
 
 Now, my own experience confirms this, so far as it relates to tlie 
 proceedings of the medium. She tried to deceive me by directing 
 my attention to the wall. Don't you hear the raps on the wall ? said 
 she. No ; but I heard them under the table. 
 
 Now, I think that I have shown that not only is the origin of these 
 spiritual manifestations very hypothetical, but that they are certainly 
 guilty of falsehood who uphold and sustain them. I think we can 
 be just as certain that the whole thing is an imposture, as we should 
 be if it were mathematically worked out before us. My friend last 
 night made admissions, which brought him clear over to my side of 
 the question ; and I will make him prove that Spiritualism is wholly 
 unreliable, by his own arguments. I will read from the Reporter's 
 notes. My friend said — 
 
 '■ I have never claimed to be able to produce test manifestations of 
 the truth of Spiritualism and to give convincing proof thereof." 
 
 Mark that! My friend is here to debate the question, whether 
 spiritual manifestations are hypothetical in their origin ; and now he 
 declares that he never claimed to be able to give convincing proof 
 that they are not hypothetical. Convincing proof ! Do we not want 
 convincing proof ? Do not we cry out for certainty in this matter ? 
 I confess to you that my opponent is the ablest exponent of Spiritu- 
 alism I have ever met or heard of; and yet he admits that he can 
 give no convincing proof of the faith that is in him. We claim, 
 therefore, that we have gained the case by his own admissions. 
 
 Here Mr. Jones' time expired. 
 
 MR. WHITING'S EIGHTH REPLICATION. 
 
 Mr. Whiting said — 
 
 " 1 have never set up any claim to be able to produce test manifest- 
 ations, or to give convincing proof thereof" — that is, by way of test 
 manifestations. These were the words I used, aud no doubt you un- 
 derstood them so at the time. So much for the admission, out of 
 which my friend has endeavoi'ed to make so much capital. 
 
 Now as to 3Iiss Ada Hoyt. As my opponent has had so much to 
 say about her, I will read an article, written by one of the editors of 
 
74 MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 the Chicago Democrat — a gentleman of education and intelligence 
 enough to conduct that paper, which is acknowledged, not only in 
 Illinois but all over the Union, to be an able, influential and impartial 
 journal. This editor, in the ordinary discharge of his duties as an 
 editor, visited Miss Hoyt, and wrote the following account of his 
 interview, and published it in his paper : 
 
 "SPIRITUAL COMMUNICATIONS— CAN THE DEAD REVISIT US? 
 
 "For several montlis past our city Las been the abode of what is termed a 
 'test medium' — tliat is to say, a person claiming to be in such rapport with 
 the spirits of the other world, as to be able to communicate between them and 
 their friends on earth at will, and to aiford such unmistakable evidence of the 
 genuineness of these communications as to convince every one whoAvitnessed 
 them. Sometimes these communications would be made through the medium 
 of raps ; again the medium would be controlled by the spirits in such a man- 
 ner, that she would be made to write messages from them of singular appo- 
 siteness and truth. Men of all classes and professions in life had visited this 
 test medium, and experienced for themselves the wonders she revealed. 
 Lawyers, clergymen, professional men, visited her, and came away bewildered 
 and amazed. All this coming to the ears of one of our reporters, and the 
 necessities of his business requiring him, like the ancient Athenians, to be 
 ever learning and telling some new thing, he resolved to pay the medium a 
 visit ; and accordingly did so, accompanied by a friend, on Saturday last. 
 
 "Miss Ada Hoyt, the medium aforesaid, resides at No. 24 South Desplaines 
 street. She is a very intelligent, lively and pleasant young Ividiy , petite in per- 
 son, and lady like in demeanor. Receiving us politely, she directed our re- 
 porter to seat himself at a table in the parlor, and write upon slips of paper 
 the names of those departed friends from whom he desired a communication. 
 The reporter did as he was directed, and entirely unseen either by his friend 
 or the medium, wrote ujaon separate pieces of paper the names of four indi- 
 viduals — one of whom had been dead some ten years, one some nine years, 
 and the other two only a few months. Tightly folding up these papers so that 
 the names could not be seen, he signified that he was ready to receive any 
 communication ; and Miss Hoyt sat down at the table upon which the names 
 were placed. Upon this table were also several pencils and a number of 
 sheets of paper. 
 
 "Almost immediately the hand of the medium became spasmodically con- 
 vulsed, and with a twitching movement she seized one of the pencils, and 
 wrote rapidly upon a sheet of paper the following words : 
 
 "'I am very happy at this opportunity to prove to you my immortality. Emma 
 Potter.' 
 
 "Now, the name of Emma Potter was one of these written upon the papers. 
 It was the name of a lady who died some years ago. No one had seen the 
 name written ; no one had heard our reporter mention it ; the person bearing 
 it had never lived in this city, or in this State ; she was not known here by 
 any one, except our reporter. How, then, was the fact that the name had been 
 discovered and written, to be accounted for? 
 
 " But our reporter jaroceeded in his questions. He inquired how long since 
 the spirit of his interlocutor had left the earth. Loud raps were instantly 
 heard upon the side of the wall, some eight or ten feet from the table at which 
 we were sitting, and the correct number of years and months was given. 
 The place of her death was then inquired and given correctly. The question 
 was then written, ' By what means were you aware of my wish to communi- 
 cate with you?' 
 
 "Before the question was quite completed the hand of the medium became 
 again agitated, and as before wrote as follows : 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 75 
 
 ^^ ^ I was with you and often icatch over you.'' 
 
 "As in the former case this -writing was done upside doM^n, and was execu- 
 ted with great rapidity and distinctness. When the raps occurred, they were 
 sometimes very loud and distinct, sometimes exceedingly low and soft, some- 
 times on the table, sometimes under the table, on the wall, upon the ceiling, 
 etc. Very soon our reporter was informed that another of the spirits whose 
 names he had written was present, and in a few moments afterwards still an- 
 other. The medium and the friend who accompanied our reporter now began 
 an animated conversation about indifferent topics, leaving the reporter to pur- 
 sue his investigations with the three spirits who were in rapport with him. 
 They rapped answers to his questions, sometimes not waiting until he had 
 written them : sometimes in reply to questions spoken without writing, and 
 sometimes compelling the hand of the medium to wi'ite the replies." 
 
 I will now call upon a gentleman wtom I see in this audience, and 
 who lias had an interview with Miss Hoyt, to state his experience of 
 her manifestations. I allude to 3Ir. Nesbit. 
 
 Mr. Nesbit arose and stated that he saw Miss Hoyt about two 
 weeks ago, at the house of a friend, in Dowagiac, 3Iichigan. I wi'ote 
 some names on three pieces of paper, and folded them up tightly. 
 On one of these ballots I wrote the names of my daughters, Mary 
 and Elizabeth, and my brother James. Miss Hoyt took up this bal- 
 lot and asked if the spirit whose name it contained was present. 
 Three raps were given in reply — and the name of Maiy was written. 
 '■Are you often with me?" I asked. "Yes, and Libby too," was 
 written in reply. The name of my other daughter I had written 
 '^ Elizabeth" in the ballot, but "Libby" was her usual name at home. 
 I asked many other questions, which were answered with perfect 
 correctness and satisfaction to me. It proved conclusively to me that 
 it was the spirit of my daughter who was conversing with me. I 
 should state that I wrote the names upon the ballot in another room, 
 before I had seen Miss Hoyt. 
 
 Mr. Whitixg resumed : 
 
 So I have two witnesses, at least, as good as my opponent; and I 
 should state also that Miss Hoyt gave an account of her interview 
 with Mr. Jones, to a gentleman who is here, which account conflicts 
 with his, inasmuch as it alleges that Mr. Jones expressed himself 
 satisfied with the responses he received. 
 
 Xow as to these test manifestations again. Before this debate took 
 place, I told my friend that I did not claim to be a test medium, but 
 that I should claim to introduce the testimony of others respecting 
 test mediums in this debate, to which he consented. He entered 
 into the debate with the understanding that I did not claim to be able 
 to produce test manifestations, and now he claims that no other kind 
 
76 MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 of evidence is good. Sometimes my friend admits that Spiritualists 
 are respectable and intelligent people ; and again lie denounces tliem 
 all as fools or knaves. He said this morning that your speaker was 
 demented, and now pays him the high compliment of saying that he 
 is the ablest exponent of Spiritualism he has ever met or heard of. 
 I repeat that I have never been able to give this kind of evidence of 
 the truth of Spiritualism, and I never knew of a speaker being called 
 upon to do it, except by Professor G-rimes and Mr. Jones. In my 
 discussions with Rev. Mr. Everett and Mr. Sapp, it was never 
 asserted that it was necessary for me to do this. Even the Harvard 
 Professors, who are opposed uo Spiritualism, never demanded that I 
 should do it. Debate is argument, not experiment or performance. 
 I do not know but that I have as good a right to demand of him that 
 he shall explain how these raps are made, as he has to demand that 
 I shall produce these manifestations here. I shall say once for all to 
 him that I am neither to be bullied, intimidated or put down. The 
 witnesses for" Miss Hoyt will speak for themselves. If the spirit 
 claiming to be the spirit of his mother deceived him, there was 
 deception somewhere — not necessarily on the part of the medium, 
 but perhaps on the part of the questioner. If I were a spirit, and a 
 person should approach me with a falsehood, I might, perhaps, on the 
 principle of answering a fool according to his folly, reply to him with 
 a falsehood. I do not say this would be so, but it might be. In re- 
 gard to the medium concerning whom he read from the Ladies' 
 Repository, she might be reliable, but she is nameless. The repu- 
 tation of Miss Hoyt is safe in the hands of the people of Chicago. 
 The editor of the Chicago Democrat says that when he visited her, 
 he heard the taps on the wall, on the ceiling, and on the table. Is 
 not his testimony good ? There are these raps unaccounted for to 
 this day, except upon the hypothesis of their spiritual origin. They 
 have been heard for twelve years. Unnumbered millions are living 
 evidences of the truths they have revealed. Every town and hamlet 
 contain the evidences of their existence, and they speak a language 
 which is unmistakable, and which no Professor has been able to ex- 
 plain away. The Buffalo Doctors endeavored to account for the raps 
 and to explain them by natural causes ; but, notwithstanding their 
 tests with glass jars and other methods, the raps continued as unac- 
 countable as before. Dr. Warner and others, who at first opposed 
 this belief, were finally converted through their investigations by the 
 Fox girls. What produces these raps ? I really hope my friend will 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 77 
 
 stow to you tow they are made. We think we have a right to ask 
 this. 
 
 The spirit raps first occurred twelve years ago, in Rochester, New 
 York, in the Fox family. These Fox girls were memhers of the 
 Methodist church — good, truthful, and reliable people, but poor. I 
 have heard aspersions cast upon their character in other places, but 
 in their home, where they are best known, they are respected and 
 esteemed. The raps continued, and all investigation has failed to 
 solve them, upon any other hypothesis than the one of spiritual 
 origin, to this day. Learned men have examined them. Eobert 
 Owen, an infidel through a long life, but who ever showed himself a 
 true philanthropist, and the poor man's friend, through these simple 
 raps became convinced, and although grey in infideli^ty, he saw in 
 them the living evidences of his immortality. 
 
 Here Mr. Whiting's time expired. 
 
 MR. JONES' NINTH ARGU3IENT. 
 
 Mr. Jones said — 
 
 I wish to ask a question or two of Mr. Nesbit. Did you, Mr. 
 Nesbit, put your papers on which you wrote the names, in a sealed 
 envelope, or in an envelope at all ? 
 
 Mr. Nesbit — No sir. The papers were folded up — folded fourfold. 
 
 Mr. Jones — May I ask where this interview took place ? 
 
 Mr. Nesbit — At Mr. Heddings. He was not aware that I ever 
 had children by the names I wrote. He lives ten miles from me, and 
 I do not think he was ever in my house. 
 
 Mr. Jones resumed — 
 
 I wish my opponent to understand that we claim no more than is 
 right by his acceptance of this challenge. We claim that the nega- 
 tive shall prove the opposite of my position. But to dp this he gives 
 us nothing but testimony no better than his own. He may intend to 
 be honest enough ; but I know how much men are warped by preju- 
 dice J and I say that such evidence is not competent. They ask us 
 how do these manifestations come; and because we cannot explain it, 
 they then demand that you are to jump at the conclusion that they 
 are of necessity of spiritual origin. That is the sort of logic they all 
 indulge in. Now, to show you how fallacious this is, take an illus- 
 
78 MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 tration : A hod carrier observes, that when water is poured upon 
 quiekUme, the water becomes wai'm and boils. He don't know why 
 it does this ; he don't know but that a spirit produces this effect ; he 
 is legitimately entitled, by the logic of our spiritual friends, to con- 
 clude that this effect is the result of a spiritual cause. This is an 
 entirely analogous case. I stand here to expose this thing of Spirit- 
 ualism, and, Grod helping me, I shall do my best to do so. No one 
 shall quarrel with me, and then give me physical demonstrations that 
 he is right. My spiritual friends here have held many meetings in 
 the school houses. They have had much to say in ridicule of the 
 story of Jonah and the whale ; but they have no whales at all. 
 When you expose the absurdity of their whale stories, they exclaim, 
 oh, don't you remember Grallileo and his persecutors ? If this be 
 persecution, be assured that I shall persecute you to the extent of my 
 ability. 
 
 Our spiritualistic friends here have abused and ridiculed the church 
 again and again ; and if I should call upon the audience to attest this 
 by rising, I should see you all upon your feet. But when I come to 
 tell them of their gullibility, the cry is, " Oh, you are a blackguard," 
 and I am told I am persecuting. I tell you again I shall persecute 
 this ism to the utmost of my ability, and you have a right to perse- 
 cute me in the same way. 
 
 My friend has endeavored to confuse the subject of evidence. They 
 claim that our evidence is no better than theirs. This is the sophism. 
 It is the duty of my opponent to give the best evidence his case will 
 afford. We say that it affords and demands experimental evidence. 
 The best evidence that my side of the case demands, I give all the 
 time. Will he do the same ? He says the conditions are not right. 
 What ! are there not mediums enough here ? I see many ladies be- 
 fore me, and I hear of a lady here who can make a table go into 
 convulsions. I see a gentleman here now who had to move from a 
 certain house in this village, because they could not go on with the 
 manifestations while he was there. He was too antagonistic : you are 
 always antagonistic when you want to get at the root of this matter. 
 We demand that this experimental and practical proof shall be pro- 
 duced here, or that my friend shall give up the discussion. Does -he 
 object because the room is not darkened ? We shall get some lumber 
 and board up the windows, so it shall be dark. Does he demand some 
 degree of what he calls "receptivity ?" I see a great deal of it in 
 the faces of some of the audience. Thev will receive this thing 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 79 
 
 -when it is clone, and not before. I am not pressing my friend indi- 
 vidually to do this thing. I don't care wlio does it. Let him send 
 to Chicago for 3Iiss Ada Hoyt^ and I -svill pay all her expenses, if I 
 cannot expose her. 
 
 Now, let Tis come to the statements of Mr. Whiting. I am glad 
 that he made certain admissions last night. In these admissions, I 
 see the signs of his conversion from the error of his ways. They 
 were as follows : that he could not give proof that these manifesta- 
 tions came from spirits ; that if required to give this proof, he must 
 give up the discussion ; that spirits of the sixth sj^here may lie, or 
 that some one may lie in their name. What an admission in a debate 
 like this ! Think of it. loving mother, yearning to commune again 
 with the spirit of your departed daughter — by the admissions of my 
 friend you may be clasping a vampire to your breast ! Think of it, 
 mother, as you think of the infant who has passed away from you 
 and desire to have it return ; beware lest some lying spirit from the 
 sixth sphere should deceive you. Is it possible ? Your own expo- 
 nent of spiritual faith has admitted that you may be deceived. By 
 what standard are we to know that the spirits purporting to be our 
 friends are so in reality, when one may come and deceive us alto- 
 gether ? If we are thus liable to be deceived, where is the ennobling 
 influence of Spiritualism to come from ? Tell me, ye wise ones, 
 where is its sublimity ? It rests on an airy foundation ; one breath 
 may make it vanish : for if you cannot determine that this spirit 
 pretending to be your infant is really yours, how do you know that it 
 may not be some fiend from hell to stab you to the heart ? By what 
 standard are we to determine the truth of a spirit ? Ah, each spirit 
 bears its impress upon itself, we are told. Does it, indeed ? and thus 
 a continued lie may at last bring out the truth ! That is agonizing 
 comfort. My friend has declared that the spirits may deceive us. 
 If so in one case, why not in another ? How, then, do you get your 
 revelations? In this way, you reply: that which is truth, we believe; 
 that which is falsehood, we reject. If we know it to be truth, it is 
 truth : the standard is in ourselves I What sort of a revelation is 
 this, then, that tells you just what you knew before ? Another ad- 
 mission made by my friend was, that an inquirer receives from the 
 spirits just such answers as he wishes, and that a fool is answered 
 according to his folly. We say just the same. You can make them 
 do anything you please. 
 
 Mr. Jones here read some recommendations of some patent pills 
 from an almanac, and said — 
 
80 MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 That is just as strong as tlie recommendations of the wonderful 
 cures my friend has read to us. You accuse a man of being an im- 
 poster, aud he brings a hundred men to swear that he is not. That 
 is exactly the logic of my friend. If he can overthrow this, I will 
 give up the case ; but not till then. I will press the battle to the 
 gate. I will have evidence, if there be any; if there be none, I want 
 to know it. 
 
 Here Mr. Jones' time espii-ed. 
 
 MR. WHITING'S NINTH REPLICATION. 
 
 Mr. Whiting said : 
 
 Before proceeding to the argument, I will read an extract of some 
 manifestations which occurred in Boston, and are corroborated by the 
 ship-news reporter of the Boston Traveller^ Mr. Clapp, of the Boston 
 Gazette, and other gentlemen : 
 
 "Mrs. French cut sheets of paper about six by eight inches square, and 
 handed them to a committee, composed of Mr. McLean, ship-news reporter 
 of the Evening Traveller, Mr. Clapp, of the Gazette, and Dr. Ware, who testi- 
 fied that they discovered no marks or drawings upon the sheets. The medium 
 then saturated the paper with water — absorbing the surplus by means of a 
 napkin — and placed them on the table, covering them with a piece of dark 
 cloth, the cape of a cloak, about two feet long by eighteen inches wide. Her 
 hands were in plain sight of the committee, who sat in front of the table and 
 of the audience. Three gas jets were burning brilliantly in the front room — 
 the table standing between that and the back room, the folding doors to which 
 were thrown wide open. There was no gas lighted in the back room. 
 
 "It is claimed by the power producing these manifestations, that, after the 
 paper is dampened, and while under the cloth, the outlines of the drawings 
 are executed, and prepared for the reception of the lead. The mode formerly 
 was to place the dampened paper away from the audience, in a dark room ; 
 but after a time it was found possible to produce the same results by merely 
 excluding the light from the paper by the use of the cloth mentioned above. 
 This must be more satisfactory to the audience, as, when the paper is upon 
 the table before them, although under the cloth, they have an opportunity of 
 watching the movements of the medium. 
 
 "After the sheets of paper had laid tinder the cloth about half an hour, 
 they were handed to the committee for examination as to whether they were 
 the same, or if there were any marks upon them. The examination was 
 satisfactory as to there being no marks upon the sheets : but the question of 
 the paper being the same was not settled, on account of reasons before stated. 
 
 "The paper was then put under the cloth, and remained there while Mrs. 
 French rubbed some lead from pencils upon small pieces of paper. The 
 sheets of drawing-paper were then taken from under the cloth, one by one, 
 each rolled into a small roll, and two or three pencils enclosed in the leaded 
 paper, inserted in the centre roll. Time was called by the medium, and the 
 pictures were produced in the time specified below. We will here state that 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 81 
 
 the time which elapsed from the dampening of the paper to the production of 
 the first drawing — during which the drawing was being prepared for the 
 reception or absorption of the lead — was three-quarters of an hour. This 
 was a much longer time than is usually required, aud may be accounted for 
 by the fatigued state of the medium. 
 
 "jNo. 1 was a small boquet of flowers, with a bird resting upon a twig. 
 Size of the drawing, three by three inches ; produced in two seconds and 
 three-quarters. 
 
 "No. 2. A collection of musical instruments, flowers, music-box, etc. Size 
 of drawing, six by three and a half inches ; time, four seconds. 
 
 "No. 3. A horse. Size, about six by five inches; time four seconds. 
 
 "No. 4. A collection of fruit and flowers. Size, eight inches by five; 
 time, one second and three-quarters. 
 
 '•'No. 5, A sea and land picture. A bay running into headlands, with a 
 large ship and three smaller craft at anchor, and boat containing figures 
 between the ship and shore. Size of drawing seven inches by five and a 
 half; time, one and a quarter seconds. 
 
 "No. 6 was drawn under peculiar circumstances. The folding doors were 
 closed, and the medium. Dr. Ware, of the committee, and Mr. Kinney, mem- 
 ber of the State Senate, were within. The paper was found to be blank, was 
 held by Mr. Kinney while the drawing was being done. This operation con- 
 sumed nearly ten minutes ; but the production of the picture, or absorption 
 of the lead, occupied only two seconds. It consists of a lamb lying on the 
 sward. A wreath of flowers, with bird hovering over them. Also, a book 
 ■ opened, having writing upon it, being a quotation from the sixtli chapter of 
 Matthew, consisting of the 2Gth to the 29th inclusive. The words are to be 
 read by a magnifying glass, being exceedingly fine. Time, two seconds. 
 
 "The friends left with the feeling that there had not been sufficient means 
 adopted to enable them to testify beyond a doubt, that the paper on wliich 
 the drawings were found was the same as that handed the medium, although 
 they believed it to be the same. 
 
 SECOND EVENING. 
 
 "But on the second evening all doubt was removed, and ample guaranty 
 given to the most skeptical mind on this point. 
 
 " Every sheet of paper had cut from it an irregular curvilinear shape, a 
 portion of its surface. In one, two corners and a side were cut from it, 
 through the centre of the letters composing the sentence, 'Truth is Power.' 
 The two first words were written on the left hand top corner, diagonally, and 
 the last word on the right hand corner. 
 
 "In addition to this, small oblong slips of paper were placed upon the 
 sheet to be drawn upon, and pins stuck through them before the visitors. 
 The slips cut from the sheets, as well as the oblong strips of paper, were held 
 by some one in the audience, until the drawings were produced, when the 
 two parts of the papers were found to match, and the pin-holes to correspond. 
 
 "This double test, applied by the medium, fully satisfied every one present 
 that the drawings were produced by some means unknown to the world. 
 
 "In point of time, too, the manifestations of the second evening were far 
 more satisfactory. In fourteen minutes from the time the papers were 
 dampened, the drawings were produced, the sheets being still damp. We 
 specify them as follows, also the time occupied in producing the drawings or 
 the absorption of the lead: 
 
 "No. 1. Boquet of flowers and hand, one second and three quarters. 
 
 "No. 2. Wreath, bird's nest and eggs, one second and a quarter. 
 
 "No. 3. Vase of flowers, one second and a quarter. 
 
 "No. 4. Boquet of flowers, one second and a quarter. 
 
 "No. 5. Flowers and child, one second and three quarters. 
 
 6 
 
82 MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 "No. 6. Cow drinking, two seconds. 
 
 "The results of this evening were satisfactory to the audience. 
 
 THIRD EVENING. 
 
 "The experiments of this evening were similar to those of the previous 
 night, as to marking paper, etc. There was one experiment, however, which 
 we tried unbeknown to the medium, which was suggested- by the remark of a 
 skeptic, that it was possible that the medium had marks upon the slips of 
 paper held by the committee which guided her in fixing pins, so that, afler 
 all, the drawings might have been done at leisure, the pin-holes made in 
 them, and dots made upon slips of paper, would allow her to match these 
 slips with the pins, with their drawings. 
 
 We therefore took one of the sheets of paper, numbered 2, from the me- 
 dium, and m^arked it with pin-holes near one edge. This was done without 
 her knowledge. When the drawing numbered 2 was produced, our mark was 
 found fair and full, proving beyond a doubt to us, that this was the same 
 sheet of paper handed to her. Besides this proof, we will state that the slips 
 of paper containing the pin-holes, and which were retained by the medium, 
 were cut from paper of our own, which we handed to her after she had taken 
 her seat at the table." 
 
 Now, we claim that these manifestations contain within themselves 
 unquestionable evidences of a supernal power. These things have 
 never been done by earthly means. They claim to be the productions 
 of spirits, and they are attested by persons who are not Spiritualists. 
 We do not now bring Spiritualists here as witnesses in their own be- 
 half; it is skeptics and unbelievers that I now bring up as witnesses. 
 They are editors who have investigated these things, and who were 
 skeptical concerning them. Who shall say that these things are not 
 evidence of the existence of spirit communion ? True, my opponent 
 may deny it, and I cannot convince him, because I am not a drawing 
 medium. He asks to have demonstrations ; but I perceive a disposi- 
 tion on his part to break conditions ; and if Miss Hoyt were brought 
 here, he might be inclined to break her conditions. But I am not 
 called upon to do these things. In an argument, testimony is rele- 
 vant — and mine is at least as good as his. He has admitted my 
 honesty ; I am glad of that. I think a great deal of my integrity : 
 but he has likewise said that a man to make and believe the asser- 
 tions I have done, must be demented ; then again, that I was the 
 ablest exponent of Spiritualism he had ever seen or heard of. That 
 is not consistent. 
 
 As to Jonah and the whale, I have nothing to say. That story is 
 found in the Bible ; and as the Bible is not under discussion, it is not 
 legitimate for me to allude to it. The audiences in the school house 
 here have been attentive and respectful, and not abusive of anybody. 
 
 Now, a few words about the pathetic appeal which my friend made 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 83 
 
 about the motlier, the infant, the vampire, and the dark fiend of hell. 
 There was something like sentimentalism in that; but I will merely 
 say that the same rule could be applied to the whole world, with just 
 the same appositeness as it is applied to Spiritualism. The world is 
 full of rogues and murderers, and they come with winning words and 
 plausible smiles ; but if you find them out, must you distrust every 
 one else ? Because one spirit comes back to earth and lies, is that a 
 proof that all the spirits will do so ? If a man comes from England 
 or France, and lies, will you therefore conclude that all Englishmen and 
 all Frenchmen are liars? I did not assert that the answers given by 
 the spirits were just what the inquiries desired ; but that they were 
 apt to be of the same tenor. Many inquirers will say that they have 
 received answers entirely contrary to their wishes. If the mind of the 
 inquirer was deceptiA^e, the spirit would be apt to be upon the same 
 plane. If a lying spirit comes back to earth, it is as good a proof of 
 the existence of spirits as if it were a truthful one. If I was now 
 discussing the character of spiritual manifestations, I could introduce 
 evidence as to their truth ; but that is not the question. My friend 
 asks how we are to detect the true from the false ? I reply, by the 
 same means that we find out each other on earth. Human reason 
 and judgment, Spiritualism acknowledges as paramount, and it is 
 given to you to separate the chafi" from the wheat. Reason is bestowed 
 on man that he may decide for himself what is truth. My opponent 
 uses his reason; all denominations of Christians use it; Spiritualists 
 and infidels use it: why does my opponent sneer at the idea that 
 Spiritualists have to depend on their reason ? The spirits always 
 claim to be spirits, however. Did smoking lime ever claim to be a 
 spirit ? Does it have any intelligence ? The raps assert that they 
 come from spirits outside of the mediums. The lime gives no such 
 assertions. If it be true that all the evidence taken together proves 
 satisfactorily that the authors of these raps are spirits of departed 
 human beings, who return with all the characteristics they displayed 
 on earth, with the addition of the improvement they may have made 
 by the opportunities they enjoyed, then we have gained our case. 
 Here Mr. Whiting's time expired. 
 
 Mr. Jones said that he did not intend to be understood as saying 
 that Mr. Whiting was demented ; but the term was applied to those 
 who would ask what sufficient evidence is. 
 
84 MODEKN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 MR. JONES' TENTH ARGUMENT. 
 
 Mr. Jones said — 
 
 When I closed my second argument this morning, I was ahout to 
 say that in pressing upon my friend the necessity of his producing 
 manifestations here, I was doing no more than the first converts to 
 Spiritualism did. You must admit that these persons were convinced 
 by evidence, or else that they were all gross deceivers. If you reject 
 the latter idea, then you must admit that I ask no more than they 
 must have asked, if they were intelligent men. If the first converts 
 were not imposters, but truthful men, we are not unreasonable in de- 
 manding the evidence that was necessary to convince them. My 
 friend endeavors to confuse you by saying that his witnesses are as 
 good as mine ; but I must remind you that his witnesses are directly 
 interested in keeping up this imposture, while mine have no interest 
 save that of truth. 
 
 Now, about these lying spirits. We have had spirits from the 
 sixth circle ; and if they have not lied, some one has lied for them. 
 In every case my friend perpetrates a sophism in this way: "Well, 
 men lie, and spirits will lie also." We know that men lie ; we have 
 abundant evidence of that : but we have the means of ascertaining 
 whether they lie or not. But I say that in the case of these com- 
 munications from the spirit world, you have no means of knowing 
 whether they are lies or not. Therefore, the cases which my friend 
 endeavors to make parallel, are not parallel, and his sophism is 
 apparent. 
 
 We had a man here to-day, who was almost dying, and he sent for 
 a doctor. Why did he not send for this Dr. Newton ? Ye Spiritu- 
 alists, would you not help a brother in distress ? Why did you not 
 send for this spiritual doctor, and have your brother raised up ? Mr. 
 Whiting's witnesses come up here and testify to the same thing that 
 he does — that these modern phenomena are spiritual, and not hypo- 
 thetical, in their origin. Whether the predelictions of these witnesses 
 are in favor of Spiritualism or not, is of little importance : for we 
 want something more than mere say-so. A man assaults me in the 
 street ; he has associates in the assault ; I prosecute him ; he brings 
 in his associates to swear him clear ; — will any court admit their tes- 
 timony ? Clearly not. But my friend says some of his witnesses 
 were skeptics. His admission last night was unfortunate : for he then 
 said, one of the conditions of all manifestations was some degree of 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 85 
 
 receptivity; and now lie says some of the witnesses who saw these 
 manifestations were skeptics. I enquire as a skeptic, and the answers 
 I receive confirm my skepticism. How, then, is Spiritualism ever 
 to convert skeptics, if it works after this fashion ? How is a man, 
 antagonistic like myself, ever to be converted ? No wonder that 
 conversions are not more numerous ; no wonder that one condition 
 necessary is receptivity : that just in proportion to your willingness 
 to be gulled, they are willing to take you in. Is not this the position 
 taken by my friend ? He says because for a good test I selected one 
 who still lived in the form, I cannot have truth given me, as I am 
 not receptive ! This shows the whole system is a system of jugglery. 
 Gro to Wizard Jacobs with a receptive mind, and he will give you all 
 the marvels under heaven. 
 
 I have made it apparent, by reasoning that cannot be dodged, that 
 if we are to be converted to Spiritualism at all, we must give up our- 
 selves entirely to the spirits. Then never will I be converted ! never 
 will I give up my individuality, until Grod gives the mandate for 
 annihilation. 
 
 Another rule of evidence is, that where witnesses do not agree, 
 there is prima facie evidence of fraud. Bearing this rule in mind, 
 I will esamine the witnesses of my friend, and see how much relia- 
 bility there is to be placed on them, and how they come in collision 
 with each other, and perjure themselves in such a manner as would 
 throw them out of any court in Christendom. In a book called the 
 "■ Unfoldings of Spiritualism," the venerable John "Wesley is made to 
 say, through a medium called Bayton : 
 
 •'I entertained many erroneous views, and I am anxious that the world 
 should know this. When on earth I preached many truths and many errors ; 
 and I wish the truth to remain and the error to be destroyed." 
 
 And in another place he is made to say — 
 
 "I often look back upon my former life and preachings, and if I could 
 retui'n to earth I would preach quite another doctrine." 
 
 Another medium, Harvey, writes a pamphlet; on page 58 of which 
 the spirit of Wesley is made to say — 
 
 "My views on theology, which I taught on earth, are in all essential points 
 the same now, only more enlarged." 
 
 Now, which will you have ? orthodoxy or heterodoxy ? Here is a 
 plain contradiction : both of the revelations must be from John Wes- 
 ley ; the mediums did not make this up, of course, oh, no ! Is this 
 
86 MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 not evidence that these mediums lie so continuously, that they don't 
 know when they do conflict with each other ? 
 
 Horace Greeley has said, that the leaders in Spiritualism are as 
 thorough a set of knaves as ever went to prison. Now, I do not 
 accuse the followers of this. I know that they have been juggled 
 and fooled by this imposture and taken in this trap ; and when they 
 blame me for throwing odium upon their belief, I say I believe just 
 what G-reeley says. My friend asked if the poem he read did not 
 partake of the very idiosynacrasy of its alleged author, Edgar Allan 
 Poe. I thought of Hamlet and Polonious, and the exclamation of 
 the latter, that a cloud was very like a whale. Oh, yes ! very like 
 the idiosyncrasy of Poe. I think, perhaps, I may be able to give you 
 the origin of that poem yet. I do not say that I will ; but I believe 
 the leaders in this matter are such literary imposters and thieves, that 
 I could find it, as I did in the case of the improvised hymn, stolen 
 from the Baptist Hymn Book. 
 
 Here Mr. Jones' time expired. 
 
 MR. WHITING'S TENTH REPLICATION. 
 
 Mr. Whiting said — 
 
 I will first read an extract from John Wesley's " Sermon on Faith," 
 
 page 407 : 
 
 "In the meantime, m<ay we not probably suppose that the spirits of the 
 just, though generally lodged in paradise, yet may sometimes, in conjunction 
 ■yvith the holy angels, minister to the heirs of salvation ? May they not — 
 
 'Sometimes, on errands of love, 
 
 Eevisit their brethren below ?' 
 "It is a pleasing thought that some of these human spirits, attending us 
 with, or in the room of angels, are of the number of those that were dear to us 
 while they were in the body. So that there is no absurdity in the question — 
 
 ' Have ye your own flesh forgot, 
 
 By a common ransom bought? 
 
 Can death's interposing tide 
 
 Spirits ere in Christ divide?' 
 But be this as it may, it is certain that human spirits swiftly increase in 
 knowledge, in holiness, and in happiness." 
 
 Who does that come from ? These are the words of John Wesley, 
 the great founder of the Methodist Church, admitting not only spir- 
 itual intercourse, but progression, as taught by Spiritualists at the 
 present day. 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 87 
 
 As appropriate to the occasion, I will now read another poem, also 
 inspired by the spirit of Edgar Allen Poe, and entitled — 
 
 "THE PROPHECY OF VALA. 
 
 "The prophecy of Vala is founded on the Scandinavian mythology. Odin, 
 the great All-Father, is the sovereign power of the universe ; Thor, a lesser 
 god, of whom it is said 'his mighty hammer smote thunder out of everything;' 
 Baldtir was a son of Odin and Frigga. He was slain by Horder, his blind 
 brother, who was persuaded to the act by Loke, an evil spirit, corresponding 
 to the Hebrew or Christian Devil. The Yalktkiex were the genii of the 
 battlefield. The thi-ee Norxex were the fates who watered the tree Yggdi-asill, 
 at whose roots it was said that a dragon was constantly gnawing. The Heim- 
 SKRixGLA was the circle of the Universe. Yala was a seress or prophetess, 
 who was summoned from the dead by Odin to tell of the fate of Baldur, but 
 on her appearance refused to do so, and to the astonishment of all, prophesied 
 the death of all the sons of Odin, at the day of Eagnaroc, which corresponds 
 to the day of judgment, with the exception that it was also the day of the 
 reconstruction or renewal of the world. The propeey of Yala, as given in 
 the old Icelandic Edda, I have used with perfect freedom, to present the idea 
 that good, though apparently overcome of evil, should ultimately triumph. 
 
 I have walked with the fates and the furieis 'mid the wrecks of the mighty past, 
 I have stood in the giant shadows which the ages have backward cast, 
 And I've heard the voices of prophets come down in a lengthening chain, 
 Translating the truth eternal, and making its meaning plain. 
 Backward still, ever backward, 'mid wreck and ruin I trod, 
 Seeking life's secret sources, and the primal truths of God. 
 
 "Tell me," I cried, "oh, prophet — thou shade of the mighty past, 
 What of the truth in the future ? is its horoscope yet cast ? 
 Thou didst give it its birth and being, thou didst cradle it in thy breast — 
 Show me its shining orbit and the place of its final rest!" 
 
 A sound like the restless earthquake, a crash like the "crash of doom," 
 And a fiery fulmination streamed in through the frightened gloom. 
 I stood in the halls of Odin, and the great All-Father shone 
 Like the centre and sun of being, 'mid the glories of his throne ; 
 And Thor, with his mighty hammer upraised in his mighty hand, 
 Stood ready to wake the thunder, at his sovereign Lord's command. 
 
 " Lo, Thor!" said the mighty Odin, "our omens are all of ill, 
 
 For the dragon gnaweth sharply at the roots of Yggdrasill, 
 
 I hear the wild Yalkyrien, as they shriek on the battle-plain, 
 
 And the moans of the faithful Nornen, as they weep over Baldur slain. 
 
 A woe to the serpent Loke, and to Herder's reckless ruth. 
 
 For goodness is slain of evil, and Falsehood hath conquered Truth ! 
 
 Now call thou on mystic Yala, as she sleeps in the grave of time, 
 
 Where the horry age hath vrritten her name in a frosty rime ; 
 
 She can tell when the sun will darken, when the stars shall cease to burn — 
 
 When the sleeping dead shall waken, and when Baldur shall return." 
 
 A sound like the rushing tempest, and the wondrous hammer fell, 
 And the great Heimskringla shuddered and swayed like a mighty bell. 
 There were mingled murmurs and discords, like the wailings of troubled souls, 
 Like the gnomes at their fiery forges — like the bowlings of restless ghouls. 
 Then out of the fiery covert of the tempest and the storm, 
 Like a vision of troubled slumber, came a woman's stately form. 
 There came a hush as at midnight, when the sheeted dead awake, 
 And even the silence shuddered, as her words of power she spoke : 
 
88 MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 "Mighty Odin, I am Vala, 
 
 I have heard your thunder-call, 
 I have heard the woful wailing 
 
 Sounding forth from Wingolf 's hall. 
 And I know that beauteous Baldur, 
 
 Loved of all the gods, is slain — 
 That the evil Loke triumphs. 
 
 And on Horder rests the stain. 
 But my words shall fail to tell you 
 
 Aught concerning him you mourn. 
 For the leaves that bear the record 
 
 From the tree of life are torn ; 
 And while Hecla's fires shall glow, 
 Or the bubbling Geysers flow, 
 Of his fate no or-e shall know — 
 Understand you this, or no ? 
 
 "I will sing a solemn Saga, 
 
 I will chant a Runic rhyme, 
 Weave a wild, prophetic Edda 
 
 From the scattered threads of time : 
 Know, oh, Odin — mighty Odin, 
 
 That thy sons shall all be slain, 
 Where the wild Valkyrien gather 
 
 On the bloody battle plain ; 
 And thy throne itself shall tremble 
 
 With the stern, resistless shock, 
 Which shall rend the woiid asunder 
 
 At the day of Ragnaroc. 
 Other stars the night shall know, 
 From the rock shall waters flow, 
 And from ruin beauty grow. 
 Understand you this, or no ? 
 
 "Vainly shall the faithful Nornen 
 
 Water drooping Yggdrasill, 
 For the wrathful, restless dragon 
 
 At its roots is gnawing still. 
 Loke's evil arts shall triumph. 
 
 Herder's eyes be dark with night, 
 Till the day of re-creation 
 
 Brings the buried Truth to Light ; 
 Then a greater God than Odin 
 
 Over all the worlds shall reign, 
 And my Saga's mystic meaning 
 
 As the sunlight shall be plain. 
 Out of evil good shall grow — 
 Doubt me not, for time shall show. 
 Understand you this, or no ? 
 Fare you well ! I go — I go ?" 
 
 There came a voice as of thunder, with a gleam of lurid light. 
 
 And the mystic Vala vanished like a meteor of the night ; 
 
 Then I saw that the truth of the present is but the truth of the past, 
 
 But each phase is greater and grander and mightier than the last — 
 
 That the past is ever prophetic of that which is yet to be. 
 
 And that God reveals his glory by slow and distinct degree ; 
 
 Yet still are the nations weeping o'er the graves of the truth and right. 
 
 Lo ! I summon another Vala — let her prophecy to-night. 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 89 
 
 With the armaranth and the myrtle and the asphodel on her brow 
 Still wet with the dew of the kingdom, doth she stand before you now : 
 
 " Not with sound of many thunders, 
 
 Not with miracles and wonders 
 Would I herald forth my coming from the peaceful spii'it shore; 
 
 But in God's own love descending, 
 
 With your aspirations blending, 
 I would teach you of the future, that you watch and weep no more. 
 
 God is God from the creation ; 
 
 Truth alone is man's salvation; 
 But the God that now you worship soon shall be your God no more, 
 
 For the soul in its unfolding, 
 
 Evermore its thought remoulding. 
 Learns more truly, in its progress, 'how to love and to adore 1' 
 
 Evil is of Good, twin-brother. 
 
 Born of God, and of none other; 
 And though truth seems slain of error through the ills that men deplore, 
 
 Yet, still nearer to perfection. 
 
 She shall know a resurrection. 
 Passing on from ceaseless glory unto glory evermore. 
 
 From the truths of former ages, 
 
 From the world's close-lettered pages, 
 Man shall learn to meet more bravely all the Hfe that lies before ; 
 
 For the day of retribution, 
 
 Is the final restitution 
 Of the good, the true, the holy, which shall live forevermore ! 
 ' Understand you this, or no ? 
 
 Fare you well ! I go — ^I go !' " 
 
 My opponent lias urged that the early Spiritualists Tvere convinced 
 by such evidence as he now calls for. But they were not convinced 
 in public debate, but in private homes. The first manifestations were 
 seen in the village of Hydesville. Large numbers of people saw 
 them, and the most of them were convinced of their spiritual origin. 
 After this there were public investigations held in Rochester. On 
 one occasion a committee of ladies were appointed to watch the girls, 
 so that it was impossible for imposture to be practiced, and the raps 
 continued as usual. I do not know what Horace Greeley may have 
 said about the leaders in Spiritualism, but I do know that the New 
 York Tribune, in 1849 and in 1852, said that their manifestations 
 did occur without imposture. I never heard of this expression of 
 Greeley's until now, but two years ago Mr. Greeley saw Cora Hatch, 
 and expressed himself well satisfied with her manifestations ; and 
 whenever he has been questioned by my spiritual friends he has 
 avowed his entire friendliness to the doctrines of Spiritualism. It is 
 singular that he should have said that all of its leaders were knaves. 
 
90 MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 My friend has undertaken to play on words. Because I said tliat 
 some were so antagonistic as to repel the spirits, he claims that I 
 said all skeptics would repel them. I said no such thing. For if no 
 skeptic could he converted then there would be no Spiritualists. I 
 was once a skeptic myself — so was every Spiritualist. We have all 
 been converted through evidence. It was not given in public debate, 
 however, nor was it produced by a public challenge. They put them- 
 selves under the conditions demanded, and they received the mani- 
 festations. To break the conditions demanded by the spirits, and 
 then to demand the manifestations, is like cutting the telegraph wire 
 and then demanding that your message be sent. A person unac- 
 quainted with telegraphing might say, oh folly, you might as well 
 send it by a string as by a wire. So you may not know all the con- 
 ditions necessary to produce certain manifestations. The question is 
 what shall be done to prevent fraud. If the raps come outside of the 
 medium, it is evident that she does not make them. My friend 
 speaks of the contradictions of the spirits ; but do they ever contra- 
 dict themselves in the assertion that they are spirits ? Do they ever 
 claim to be anything else but human spirits ? We don't care whether 
 a spirit comes from one place and says he is the spirit of John Wes- 
 ley, and another comes from another place and contradicts him. That 
 proves nothing against the origin of spiritual manifestations. They 
 never contradict themselves as to the fact of their being spirits. It 
 makes no dilFerence where they come — whether in London, or Paris, 
 or Rome, or Chicago, or Decatur — they still say " we are spirits." 
 
 In regard to the teaching of the spirits we say there is a difference, 
 and the communication given generally bears something of the char- 
 acter of the medium. When an individual spirit controls a medium 
 he controls him by a natural law, and controls him, too, just in pro- 
 portion to the amount of magnetism he can bring to bear iipon him. 
 One mind in the body can control another just in proportion to this 
 magnetism, and so out of the body also. It is the mind of the mag- 
 netizer that acts. After death, the soul being immortal, why should 
 it not have the same privileges it had in the body, and have the 
 power to control beings in the form ? A spirit from the spirit world 
 magnetizes some person here, and the communication which it gives 
 will be in exact proportion to the amount of control it can exercise. 
 My friend sneered at healing medicines, and asked why we did not 
 send for Dr. Newton. I reply that he has all that he can do at his 
 residence in Boston, and that he cannot leave there without injustic 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 91 
 
 to tlie suffering. But tliere are other healing mediums. I was con- 
 versing with a healing medium to-day, who said that it was prophe- 
 sied to him, m a very remarkable manner, that he should be given 
 the gift of healing by the laying on of hands, and that the prophesy 
 was fulfilled when he least expected it. One medium does not pro- 
 fess to cure all kinds of diseases. There is a law of spirit adaptation. 
 The law of spirit control is but little understood. One class of 
 mediums will reach a particular class of diseases, and another class 
 will reach another. 
 
 Here Mr. Whiting's time expired. 
 
 MR. JONES' ELEVENTH ARGUMENT. 
 
 Mr. Jones said — 
 
 I wish then they would give to the world their new system of 
 medicine. Our medical brethi-en, I have no doubt, would receive 
 the new dispensation gladly. 
 
 The admissions of my friend continue to be fatal to his position. 
 I candidly advise him to make no more of them. 
 
 Has this audience assembled here to listen to long and tedious 
 poems, purporting to come from the spirit of a dead man ? I fancy 
 that this was not the entertainment to which you thought yourselves 
 invited. These verses do not prove that they came from Mr. Poe 
 any more than they prove that Paradise Lost was written by Socrates. 
 The Spiritualists in this discussion have shown themselves to be like 
 the ancient Hydra, which Plercules endeavored to exterminate. No 
 sooner had he lopped off one of its many heads, than two others, 
 still more horrible, appeared in its place. So with Spiritualism. No 
 sooner is one of its errors destroyed, than two others, still more horri- 
 ble, stand up in its place. 
 
 In reply to what my friend has quoted from one of John "Wesley's 
 sermons, I have only to say this. You have often accused us (the 
 Methodists) of pining our faith to the sleeve of John Wesley. We 
 do not do it. We no more believe Wesley than we do you. No 
 matter what his opinions are, it is no proof that they are right. I 
 respect the opinions of John Wesley, but to pin my faith in him I will 
 not do it. I wish my friend to know that we do not care one iota 
 what John Wesley said, or what St. Paul said, or, for that matter, 
 
92 MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 what tlie Saviour himself said, bearing upon this subject. What we 
 want now is convincing proof that the modern spiritual manifestations 
 come from spiritual sources. You may cannouize John Wesley, or 
 even make a Pope of him — but we will say take away your Pope 
 Wesley. We want positive proof of the origin of these manifestations, 
 and we do not want what this or that man says about them. What 
 your Wesley saw, or what your St. Paul saw, is no proof that you 
 have seen these manifestations. We care no more for John Wesley's 
 testimony than we care for yours. 
 
 But my friend misrepresents John Wesley. I must not let the 
 slander rest upon his venerable head of teaching the progression 
 which Spiritualists teach. If he did I have not understood the phi- 
 losophy of modern Spiritualism, which teaches, as I understand it, a 
 progression from the lowest filth and degradation up to the very top 
 shelf of supernal glory. John Wesley never taught such a doctrine, 
 and the gentleman wrongs him to say that he did. 
 
 Now my friend's remarks about convincing skeptics of the truth of 
 Spiritualism amount simply to this. You cannot convince a man 
 who is a stubborn skeptic — who will not believe without evidence. 
 But you must believe first, and you shall have evidence hereafter. 
 
 Now as to the raps. Suppose that I made these raps, and you 
 could not determine where the noise came from. Would it be legiti- 
 mate for you therefore to conclude that of necessity they came from 
 a spirit outside of the human form ? Is not that preposterous ? 
 Is not that a lame and impotent conclusion ? 
 
 I know something of these Fox girls. I have seen a lady who 
 lived in the very house, at Hydesville, where these rappings first 
 took place, and who says that after these girls moved away there were 
 no rappings took place in the house. My friend says the raps evi- 
 dence the truth of Spiritualism. (Here the speaker gave three raps 
 on the table.) Does that prove the existence of a spirit ? How did 
 the spiritualists first know that the spirits wanted to rap ? Did the 
 raps speak for themselves ? Oh yes, you will say, they called for the 
 alphabet. There is in this very assumption one of the strongest 
 proofs of fraud. How did they call ? Oh, by raps. (Here the 
 speaker rapped again.) Now, what did I call for then ? Was it for- 
 the alphabet ? I will state that the Buffalo doctors proved that the 
 raps were made by the knees and fingers of the girls themselves. 
 Now the leaders of this imposture go in to make a good thing out of 
 it. The Fox girls were poor ; they were not likely to get married, 
 and so they found out that the spirits wanted the alphabet ! 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 93 
 
 Anotlier sophism that my friend perpetrates is his declaration that 
 because these manifestations claim to be from spirits, the claim must 
 be true. Did you ever know an imposter who did not claim that he 
 was the real man ? Do not all the rogues claim to be honest men ? 
 The spiritual leaders all confederate and agree as to this one point — 
 that they will claim the spiritual origin of their manifestations. My 
 friend must know that when witnesses contradict each other there 
 arises the presumption of fraud. Did he stand here attacking any 
 other system of faith, he would use this very argument to overthrow 
 it. He knows that no court will accept testimony so contradictory as 
 this. 
 
 In behalf of medical men I expose this imposture of the pre- 
 tended miraculous cures by the laying on of hands. It is not just to 
 the medical profession to allow such an imposture to pass without 
 exposure. My friend says that patients who wish to be cured by Dr. 
 Newton must go to Boston. Well, that costs money. But we have 
 a man here, who, on account of a chronic rheumatism, goes about the 
 town on crutches. He is a hard case to cure. I am authorized to 
 say that we will give Dr. Newton a chance to try his skill on this 
 man. If he will come here and cure him, he shall have $100 and all 
 his expenses paid, coming and returning. This man would give any 
 amount of money to be cured of his malady. Bring along your heal- 
 ing mediums and let them try it. 
 
 I will in this connection read an affidavit which I hope will satisfy 
 my friend as to how the raps are made : 
 
 [From Prof, ilattison's work on Spiritualism.] 
 STATEMENT OF MR. PACK. 
 
 Having been called on by Prof. Mattison, in relation to certain tables made 
 by me for parties in this city, I am free to state that I have made ti,vo medium 
 tables during the last year, both of which had machinery concealed in them, 
 for producing raps at the will of the operator. The beds, 1]- inch thick, were 
 cut out in the center so as to admit the machinery, and then carefully covered 
 so as to leave a hollow, and make the sounds louder. Wires were carried out 
 to the legs of the table, inside the cover and legs, by which the hammer was 
 worked. I am not sufficiently acquainted with the machine and the manner 
 of working it to describe the machine in detail. My business was simply to 
 make the tables for the reception of the spirits, and that I have done this in 
 two instances, and am ready to do it in two or twenty more if I am paid for 
 it, I am willing to assert, and if people will give a dollar a piece to hear a 
 little hammer strike inside a table bed, and run crazy about it, it is not my 
 fault. 
 
 HIRAM PACK, 488 Pearl Street. 
 
 New Toei^, March 2.5th, 1853. 
 
 Here Mr. Jones' time expired. 
 
94 MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 MR. WHITING'S ELEVENTH REPLICATION. 
 
 Mr. Whiting said — 
 
 I hold in my hand a book entitled the " Principles of Nature and 
 
 her Div'ne Revelations," by Andrew Jackson Davis. It was written 
 
 in 1844. Here is a prophecy to which I wish to call your attention, 
 
 for I am now coming to that portion of my subject relating to the 
 
 proof of Spiritualism by the fulfillment of prophecies. The spiritual 
 
 manifestations first appeared on the 31st day of this month, thirteen 
 
 years ago; and this prophecy concerning them was uttered in 1844, 
 
 or seventeen years ago. I re?d the prophecy. It is on page 675 of 
 
 the book referred to : 
 
 It is a truth that spirits commune with one another while one is in the body 
 and the other in the higher spheres, and this, too, when the person in the 
 body is unconscious of the influx, and hence cannot be convinced of the fact ; 
 and this truth will ere long present itself in the form of a living demon- 
 stration. 
 
 I now wish to read to you certain prophecies which were made of 
 the loss of the steamboat Lady Elgin, on the 23d of last September. 
 These prophecies were made from thirty-six hours prior to the dis- 
 aster up to the very moment of their fulfillment. They were pub- 
 lished in many of the Wisconsin and Chicago papers, and no doubt 
 exists as to their perfect authenticity : 
 
 "This melancholy disaster has given publicity to a great number of pre- 
 monitions, warnings, visions, dreams, etc., which alone afford sufficient proof 
 to establish the truth of the power of man, after he has left the normal tem- 
 ple, to return in his spiritual form. We have heard of many facts, and have 
 talked with many friends of the lost ones, and the following is what we have 
 heard: 
 
 " Mrs. Marj' Ann Weiskopf lost her husband on the Elgin. On Saturday, 
 at four o'clock in the morning, she awoke from her sleep by a dream. Mrs. 
 Weiskopf says — 'I dreamed that my first husband came to me, and presented 
 me au ear of corn, one end of which was decayed, the balance wet and cold 
 and stripped of its husks, creating in my soul a terrible desolate feeling, and 
 I wept. He then presented me three beautiful pocket knives, indicating to 
 me that they would sustain me. Soon after a terrible, desolate condition took 
 possession of me, and I became fully aware of the fact of my husband's death. 
 Early in the morning I went to my husband's partner (Mr. John Limbert), 
 and told him that Henry was dead, and that the boat was lost." Mr. Limbert 
 tells me that this was at six forty-five a. m., Saturday morning, and that he 
 laughed at her for her trouble. At nine o'clock a. m., or three hours after- 
 ward, the telegraph brought the news of this sad affair. Mrs. Weiskopf 's 
 dream presentation was true. The ear of corn, her husband was gone ; the 
 three beautiful knives represented her two sons and daughter, all living chil- 
 dren by her first husband, on whom she can lean for support, 
 
 "The Misses Mathews, Catholics, living two doors from where I make my 
 home, are dress makers, who have sustained themselves for sonie time through 
 their trade. These good sisters, or the two younger ones, determined that the 
 older one should go on this excursion ; and when they first proposed it to her, 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 95 
 
 site was mucli pleased with the idea, and preparations was made for the occa- 
 sion. On the fifth of September, or the day before the excursion, the elder 
 sister manifested a disposition not to go. Why she could not tell; and at 
 night she told her sisters that she believed if she went, she should be drown- 
 ed. They laughed at her, and told her she was foolish. On the morning of 
 the sixth they fairly forced their sister to dress for the excursion ; and after 
 she was ready, she had a mind not to go. Her sisters led her to a glass and 
 said, 'see how pretty you look; you must go!' 'Oh, my sisters,' said the 
 girl, 'if I go I shall he drowned!' Her sisters told me that they had to force 
 her to go ; and she left her sisters, weeping, and was swallowed up in this 
 calamity. Truly our spirit friends were not idle. 
 
 "Mrs. William Wilson said, 'Jly husband was on the steamer and was lost. 
 I went to bed on Friday night, having no fear of my husband's safety.' On 
 Saturday morning, at the precise time of the accident, Mrs. W. awoke from a 
 deep sleep, and was forced out of her bed. She went to her son's room, and 
 said, 'William, arise, the boat is lost and your father is dead.' 'Oh, go away, 
 mother, don't be bothering me; you're always troubled about nothing.' The 
 mother then went to her daugher, and called her from her sleep, saying — 
 'Arise, my child, for the steamboat is lost, and your father is drowned. Get 
 up; come and talk with me.' And from that time till the news was confirmed, 
 Mrs. Wilson constantly afiBrmed that the boat was lost ; and the people said, 
 with one accord, she is mad ! 
 
 "A little boy said, at the telegraph office, 'My mamma is lost! and when 
 she went away she looked at us and cried. She then took my little sister and 
 kissed her, and said, ' If I am drowned you must go and live with such a 
 woman, my dear.' And then she kissed my little brother, and said, 'If I am 
 drowned, you must be a good little boy, and live with such a man.' But she 
 did not tell me,' said the little weeper, 'where I would live.' 
 
 "A woman says, 'I murdered my husband; he did not wish to go : I caused 
 him to go, and that, too, when he told me that he believed that the boat would 
 be lost.' 
 
 "An Irish mother had three sons on board of the Elgin. She dreamed on 
 Friday night, that Tom came home, naked, wet and cold, and that Tom said, 
 when asked about his brothers, that they were in the water, and that the 
 boat was lost. The above came true. Tom was saved, and the others lost. 
 
 "Mrs. Smith, of Market street, says: 'My husband was loth to go, even 
 after he was all ready, saying, I fear that I shall be drowned. I pushed him 
 along, saying, go and enjoy yourself; you will not be drowned. My husband 
 started, and then returned, saying, Mary, shall I go? Yes, I said, go; don't 
 be so faint-hearted. Now go along, and enjoy yourself.' He was lost. 
 
 "Mrs. Slater, a Methodist, whose father is a preacher said, 'People must 
 now believe I heard, last night, at the time of the accident, the cries and 
 moaning of the people, and it awoke me, and I called to my husband, and 
 told him something had happened to the boat, and I was afraid that the boat 
 was lost.' 
 
 "Mrs. Blanchard, a strict Presbyterian, could not rest; she felt that there 
 was trouble — feared for the boat — and thus expressed herself to her friends. 
 
 "A Mr. Thompson told me that he heard a man in conversation with others, 
 make the following statement; 'My little nephew lost a father on the Elgin, 
 and at three o'clock Saturday morning, this boy awoke from a deep sleep, 
 and called out to his mother, asking, 'Is father drowned?' 'No, my child; 
 why do you ask that?' Well, he is drowned,' said the boy. 'Be still, my 
 boy; the boat is safe, and is not in yet.' Soon after, the little boy called 
 again to his mother, and said, 'Mother, father is drowned!' and wept bitterly. 
 
 Mrs. Kennedy says; 'I cried when my children left. Why I should cry, I 
 know not. It was a pleasure party, yet I felt that there was trouble, and 
 I should not see them again.' Her son was lost. 
 
 ♦'At Chicago, Capt. Wilson, of the Lady Elgin, expressed himself unwilling 
 
96 MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 to leave port. Why, he knew not; but consented to leave at the urgent solici- 
 tation of the excursion party. 
 
 '•I am informed that the proprietors of the Briggs House earnestly urged 
 Mr. Ingraham and his party not to leave on the Elgin ; yet they would go. 
 Certainly we cannot accuse the gentlemanly proprietors of the Briggs House 
 of having any other motive than fear for the safety of their guest. 
 
 "Mr. Henry Weiskopf, husband of the lady mentioned previously, went on 
 business to Chicago, and the party with whom he did business, writes to his 
 (Mr. W.'s) partner, of this city, that Mr. W. frequently mentioned his fears 
 of approaching trouble, and that he was afraid he would be drowned. Why, 
 he could not tell. 
 
 "Capt. H. V. Corbett, wrecker by profession, and a man well known in 
 this city, told me as follows : ' For three weeks I have been deeply impressed 
 that a great calamity was at hand on this lake, and would soon take place, 
 involving many lives. I felt it, and frequently mentioned my impression, 
 only to be laughed at. I have learned to respect these impressions or pre- 
 monitions.' 
 
 "I am informed that a lady, who occupies a prominent position in society, 
 (the name I am not permitted to use,) whose husband was on the boat, felt 
 and knew that the boat was lost; and when the news came, and friends went 
 with the mournful tidings to her, she received them calmly, and before they 
 had spoken said, 'I know what you have come for; the Elgin is lost!' And 
 all supposed her husband was lost, but fortunately he was saved." 
 
 I will now introduce another prophecy, given by Mr. E. V. Wilson. 
 I give this for just what it is worth. Part of it has certainly been 
 fulfilled. As an offset against this, my opponent may adduce pro- 
 phecies, which have been made, and which have not been fulfilled ; 
 but this does not prove that these which have been fulfilled, are not 
 of spiritual origin : 
 
 "On Thursday afternoon and evening, Sept. 6th, I was at Madison, the 
 capital of this State, about one hundred and thirty miles from this city, inland, 
 and about one hundred and thirty from the scene of the accident. At noon, 
 on the 6th, I began to feel the influence of the spirit world. This continued 
 to increase under the direction of my tried spirit friend and guide. Dr. 
 Roberts, until evening. AVe were at the house of R. L. Day, Esq., and had 
 appointed a circle for the evening at an early hour. There were present R. 
 L. Day and lady, T. N. Bovee and lady, Mrs. Williams, Miss Angry Coatts, 
 and I believe three or four others. After a little conversation I became en- 
 tranced, and commenced prophecying. After speaking for some time in pro- 
 phecy, referring to the state of Europe, the future of France, Austria, Russia, 
 England and America, stating when certain great events would take place, 
 the spirit said, 'Now, to satisfy you of our power to foretell events, we will 
 give you a test : In a few days you shall hear of one of those fearful calam- 
 ities — an awful disaster on the water — more fearful than any that has ever 
 taken place in these parts, and one that will startle the public, and curdle the 
 blood, carrying gloom and woe to many in this part of the country.' At this 
 period the spirit was questioned sharply by a prominent lawyer present, as 
 well as others, and was asked when this accident would take place. The 
 answer was, positively within four days ; and when questioned further on the 
 subject, the spirit was very positive, and repeated the prediction, calling the 
 attention of all present to take notice of this great test as a proof of his (the 
 spirit's) power to foretell events. And at the conclusion of his prophecies, 
 he reminded them of it again, and wished them to consider it as a test in 
 favor of spirit communion with earth life. 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 97 
 
 Now, my dear Banner, this was on Thursday, Sept. 6th, between ten and 
 eleven o'clock p.m., and about twenty-eight hours before the accident. And 
 the news of the sad calamity was in Madison at ten o'clock a. m., Saturday, 
 Sept. 8th, in less than thirty-six hours after the prophecy. Truly God is still 
 with us through his spirit agents in these modern times, and the mantle of 
 prophecy still rests upon the shoulders of the sons and daughters of men. 
 Are we not still receiving revelations from the supernal source of all wisdom ? 
 Is there — has there ever been more positive testimony of the foreshadowing 
 of a great calamity, than I have here related? 
 
 I have made many other prophecies, and many of them have come to pass. 
 Some of them have been published. 
 
 The last war of France with Austria was predicted in 1856 in the Eobinson 
 House, Toronto, in the presence of several persons, who took notes and kept 
 those notes. And there was made in Buifalo, and published in the Age of 
 Progress, a communication, giving news of a battle at Sebastopol, giving the 
 days of the fight, the repulse of the English, etc., and that, too, nine days 
 before the news reached us in America. 
 
 Will some of your talented correspondents take up the subject of prophecy, 
 and give us the law through which spirits are enabled to foretell such events 
 as mentioned by me, instead of devoting so much time to prove that children 
 belong to the fish creation, or, at most, are only poUiwogs in human mud- 
 puddles ? Tours for the truth, 
 
 E. V. WILSON. 
 
 Milwaukee, Sept. 11, 1860. 
 
 Now those persons wlio experienced tlie premonition of tlie loss of 
 the Lady Elgin, and who prophesied thereof, were not all, or even 
 chiefly, spiritualists. But the facts show the power of spirit influence. 
 These events remind us of the good demon of Socrates, who always 
 attended him, and who warned him of all coming events — warning 
 him even on the day of his death that no evil should that day befall 
 him, and thereby enabling Socrates to regard death as no evil. Thus, 
 like a good angel, came these premonitions of the disaster of the Lady 
 Elgin — coming to Catholics, to Protestants, to Methodists and to 
 Presbyterians alike. These surely are not spiritualists testifying in 
 their own behalf. Will my friend reject these also ? No human eye 
 could see but that the ill-fated Lady Elgin, as she left the port of 
 Chicago, would have a safe passage. But Capt. Wilson went out on 
 her, on that awful night, with the belief that some terrible danger 
 was impending over him. There was no outer evidence of the fate 
 that was to befal the boat, but the hand of the spirits, waving from 
 the other world, told the sad tale that they might prepare for it. If 
 all this had happened in olden times it would certainly have been 
 considered a wonderful fulfillment of prophecy; and spiritualists 
 accept it as part of the chain of evidence of the truth of their belief. 
 
 In 1855 the spiritual paper published at Waukegan, III., called 
 the Western Orient, edited by Hiram Hugunin, published a prophecy 
 as to a forthcoming war in Europe. In this prophecy the very events 
 7 
 
98 MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 wMcli have since occurred on that continent were forshadowed with 
 great distinctness. The spirits have also prophesied the present strife 
 between the northern and southern portions of our own nation, and 
 that Buchanan would not serve out his time as President of an united, 
 but a divided people. This has certainly been remarkably fulfilled. 
 The separation of our confederacy has been foretold by many 
 mediums. Different proj)hecies have been made as to the late war in 
 Europe and the loss of the Pope's power, which have been fulfilled. 
 These prophecies are numerous. And were it not for invading the 
 sacred privacy of the domestic circle, I could unveil to you the ful- 
 fillment of prophecies that wouid astound you. There are mediums 
 who prophecy upon matters of family and domestic interest, and of a 
 business nature, who can unveil the future. But these mediums are 
 few, and their manifestations are generally confined to a few who can 
 appreciate them. 
 
 Now my friend is anxious to know how the Fox girls found out 
 that the spirits wanted the alphabet. Mrs. Fox first discovered that 
 by moving her hand the raps would follow it ; and strike as many 
 times as she did. The idea very naturally suggested itself to her 
 that if they could count, they could also say A, B, C. It seems to be a 
 very poor argument that my friend has built up upon this. If I had 
 never seen or heard of raps, and they should come to me, I should 
 naturally ask questions of them, and if they wanted the alphabet, 
 would soon ascertain it. 
 
 In my quotation from John Wesley, I did him no injustice. I 
 quoted from him word for word. His idea of progression is just 
 what the Spiritualists believe in. Wesley is the grand oracle of the 
 Methodist church. I respect him very much. In many other re- 
 spects than this he held my own opinions. 
 
 Mr. Whiting's time here expired. 
 
 MR. JONES' TWELFTH ARaUMENT. 
 
 Mr. Jones said — 
 
 For the conclusion of this discussion, and the introduction of otter 
 evidence, there remains but one hour. It will be necessary therefore 
 for me to lay aside the consideration of some things advanced by my 
 opponent, and attend to the points made by him in his last speech. 
 
MODEKN SPIKITUALISM. 99 
 
 And first, as to the fulfillment of prophecy. Now it does not follow 
 that because things are foretold and then come to pass, that the 
 prophecy of their coming had its origin in a super mundane source — 
 a source superior to the organism through which the prophecy came ; 
 Our friend has told us that the spiritual manifestations were first 
 foretold by that seer, Andrew Jackson Davis. To show you how 
 much credit is to be given to Mr. Davis as an honest man, I will tell 
 you two things about him which cannot be denied, and which indi- 
 cate a previous understanding between him and the Fox girls. In a 
 lecture delivered in Cleveland one night, Mr. Davis prophesied that 
 Horace Mann was soon to lecture on woman. He had seen the MSSJ 
 in a clairvoyant state, and would give some quotations from the lecture, 
 which his audience would afterwards see when it was printed. He 
 did so — when a gentleman rose up in his seat and said, " Mr. Davis, 
 that quotation I to-day read in the Neio Yorh Tribune, and if you 
 dispute it, I will bring the paper here and read it to the audince.'^ 
 This is one instance of Davis' honesty. On another occasion he stole 
 from a scientific publication an article on the causes of rain, altered 
 its title, published it, and declared that he had himself seen all these 
 phenomena in the atmosphere. What confidence can you place in 
 such a man as this ? 
 
 Now as to these prophecies about the "Lady Elgin." They amount 
 to this : " He said that many people said, that somebody else said, 
 that this disaster was predicted." The facts are, that the vessel 
 went out upon an excursion — she was overladen and crowded with 
 people ; many persons, of a timid and fearing nature, would suspect 
 that some disaster might happen to her. Now if all the premonitions 
 had occurred, which is perfectly probable, and the vessel had come 
 home safe, we never would have heard of them ; but as the vessel > 
 chanced to be lost, they are now claimed as prophecies, and as irre- 
 sistable proof of the truth of Spiritualism. Besides this, it is very 
 easy to make up prophecies after the event predicted has occurred. 
 A gentleman told me that he had a strong impression that during this 
 discussion the walls of this hall would give way, and that a terrible 
 scene of destruction would occur. Now if this should happen, my 
 spiritual friends would hail it as a wonderful fulfillment of prophecy. 
 But I prophesied that the walls would not fall, and my prophecy is 
 likely never to be heard of. I can bring you dozens of prophecies 
 made by Spiritualists, which have never come to pass. For instance, 
 there was a medium named Maumette, who lived at [Little Prairie 
 
100 MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 Round, wlio prophecied that Mr. Morris, tlie brotlier of John and 
 Dolphin Morris, had been lost on board the steamer " Central Ameri- 
 ca." I have an affidavit about this which I will read : 
 
 Decatur, Mich., March 22tli, 1861. 
 I hereby certify, that about two years and a half ago, a -woman, named 
 Maumette, who was called a medium, came to my house and declared that 
 she was very much ti'oubled with the spirit of my brother, who had been ab- 
 sent for several years, and said that she could give me some information con- 
 cerning him. And I hereby declare that the said woman said that my brother 
 had left Missouri, to which place he went when he left us, and had gone to 
 California; but being unsuccessful in business, had started for the States in 
 the "Central America," and that he had perished in the waters, and was then 
 beneath the waters of the sea. And fui'thermore, I declare that in three 
 months after I received a letter directly from my brother, James Morris, and 
 have received others since that time, which show him to be a resident of 
 North-Western Missouri, where he resided then and resides now. I would 
 furthermore state, that the said woman was very much disturbed by this cir- 
 cumstance, and would not yield the point until several letters rendered the 
 certainty entirely incontrovertible. 
 
 STATE OF MICHIGAN, ) 
 
 VAN EUEEN COUNTY. J 
 
 Dbcatub, Mich., March 12th, 1861. 
 There personally appeared before me, Dolphin Morris, and made solemn 
 oath to the truth of the foregoing statement and aiSdavit. 
 
 ORRIN T. WELCH, Justice of the Peace. 
 
 There is a prophecy for you now ! What a glorious fulfillment was 
 there of it. Another prophecy was given by that lady, who has be- 
 fore been named so frequently in these debates, at No. 134 South 
 Sixth street, Williamsburg, on the 29th of November, 1854. 
 
 [Here the speaker read a prophecy relating to events that would 
 occur in Europe, and which alluded to the assassination of one of the 
 crowned heads of Europe, and to the appearance of a man in Italy, 
 who should be a traitor to his King, but a true man to his Grod. The 
 gentleman failed to furnish the reporter with the extract, and it does 
 not, therefore, occur here. — Reporter.] 
 
 Now the medium who gave this prophecy, when it appeared to fail, 
 sought to fix it upon Nicholas of Russia, who died during the Cri- 
 mean war. Another prophecy was made in the New York Times, of 
 April, 1856, stating that the steamer Ericson had gone down at sea 
 on the 26th of that month. The same paper, ten days afterwards, 
 published an article chronicling the safe arrival of the vessel at New- 
 York. 
 
 I have read an affidavit from a spiritual table maker, that shows 
 how some of the raps are to be accounted for. Now I want to know 
 how it is that all your rapping mediums are ladies. Is it because 
 
■ MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 101 
 
 their voluminous crinoline and flowing skirts are necessary to conceal 
 the knocking they use to produce the raps ? I tell you that wherever 
 there is a rap, there is a rogue. 
 
 Now, I wish to read to you the testimony of the editor of the 
 New Orleans Crescent. I should first state, that when I recently vis- 
 ited New York, I went to the office of the Spiritual Telegraph, and 
 saw Mr. Patridge. I asked him to direct me to some of the best and 
 most reliable spirit mediums in the city. "Sir," said he, "I regret 
 to say that our ablest medium is now out of the city — that is Dr. 
 Kedman." In the New Orleans Crescent of February 29th, 1860, 
 I read the following concerning this man so highly recommended by 
 the editor of the Spiritual Telegraph : 
 
 "DISAPPEARANCE OF DR. REDMAN, 
 
 '■We yesterday gave some account of tie sudden disappearance of Dr. Red- 
 man (not Redmond, as we had it,) the pretended spiritual medium, who had, 
 for some weeks, been astonishing and fleecing credulous people in this com- 
 munity. He disappeared in consequence of the arrival of Dr. Bly, who 
 quickly went to work to show some of the victims how they had been deceived, 
 and opened an office on Dauphine street, near that of the swindler, that he 
 might be ready at hand to explain the swindle to all who felt like calling. 
 We were misinformed when we stated that Redman's cheating was first dis- 
 covered by a well-known Spiritualist in this city. Dr. Bly, arriving qmckly 
 and finding out the names of some of the most prominent of the victims, had 
 an interview with this gentleman ; and after astonishing him with raps and 
 messages from departed friends — all done in such a manner as to baffle the 
 closest scrutiny — developed the whole cheat to him, and requested him to visit 
 Redman again, the latter not yet being aware of Ely's arrival. The gentle- 
 man went; had another sitting with Redman; was this time able to see into 
 the trick ; denounced him as an imposter, and demanded the restoration of 
 over a hundred dollars he had paid to him. Redman refunded the money, and 
 in less than an hour from that time he was off for parts unknown. Yesterday 
 we visited Dr. Bly. He satisfied us thoroughly as to what he professed. He 
 produced the so-called spirit rappings, and produced written messages from 
 our dead friends, in a manner as perfect as we ever saw at any spiritual sit- 
 ting or circles, at many of which we have been present. He told us before 
 he began, that he was only going to humbug us; and believing this, we were 
 still profoundly astonished, for we were utterly unable to detect the humbug- 
 gery. Afterward, when the Doctor explained the tricks and put us in the 
 way of doing the same things as well as he, we will freely confess that our 
 astonishment amounted to the sublime. There never was a cheat so simple. 
 The California ball game, and the other scientific tricks with which swindlers 
 decoy cash out of the pockets of the unwary, must hide their diminished 
 heads before these pretended spiritual manifestations by which Redraan and 
 other robbers have reaped so much money from the unsuspecting multitudes." 
 — New Orleans Crescent, February 29th, 1860. 
 
 What will our spiritual friends say now ? "Will they persist in 
 spite of all this in crowding their belief down our throats? I again 
 tell you, that wherever there is rap there is a rogue. 
 
 My friend may get rid of this by saying, that in our own church 
 
102 MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 there are hypocrites and rascals ; I admit it. But we do not endorse 
 the ability of a man in our church, hut simply his moral character ; 
 and when we find him to be a rogue, we denounce him and do not 
 endorse him, as the editor of the Spiriiuol Tekgrajjli endorsed Red- 
 man to me. I love an honest humbug like Dr. Bly; but I hate an 
 imposter like Redman. When these imposters trifle as they do with 
 our most sacred feelings, there is no language too severe to express 
 my condemnation of their conduct. 
 Here Mr. Jones' time expired. 
 
 MR. WHITING'S TWELFTH REPLICATION. 
 
 Mr. Whiting said — 
 
 I first wish to read to you from " Owen's Footfalls on the Boundery 
 of another World," page 289, the following statement of the dis- 
 coveiy of the intelligence of the Raps, by the Fox girls : 
 
 "Kate Fox tried, by silently bringing together her thumb and forefinger, 
 whether she could still obtain a response. Yes ! It could see then as well as 
 hear. She called her mother: 'Only look, mother!' she said^ bringing to- 
 gether her finger and thumb as before ; and as often as she repeated the noise- 
 less motion, just so often responded the raps. 
 
 "This at once arrested her mother's attention. 'Count ten,' she said, 
 addressing the noise. Ten strokes distinctly given ! 'How old is my daugh- 
 ter Margaret?' Twelve strokes ! 'And Kate?' Nine! 'What can all this 
 mean?' was Mrs. Fox's thought; who was answering her? Was it only some 
 mysterious echo of her own thoughts ? But the next question she put seemed 
 to refute that idea. 'How many children have I?' she asked aloud. Seven 
 strokes! 'Ah,' she thought, 'it can blunder sometimes.' And then, aloud, 
 'Try again!' Still the number of raps was seven. Of a sudden, a thought 
 crossed Mrs. Fox's mind: 'Are they alive?' she asked. Silence for answer. 
 'How many are living ?' Six strokes. 'How many dead?' A single stroke. 
 She had lost a child. 
 
 "Then she asked, 'Are you a man?' No answer. 'Are you a spirit ?' It 
 rapped. 'May my neighbors hear, if I call them?' It rapped again. 
 
 "Thereupon she asked her husband to call a neighbor — a Mrs. Redfield — 
 who came in laughing ; but her cheer was soon changed. The answers to her 
 inquiries were as prompt and pertinent as they had been tn those of Mrs. 
 Fox. She was struck with awe ; and Avhen in reply to a question about the 
 number of her children, by rapping four instead of three, as she expected, it 
 reminded her of a little daughter, Mary, whom she had recently lost, she 
 burst into tears." — Page 289. 
 
 In regard to the discovery of the body of the peddler in the cellar 
 of the house at Hydesville, about which my friend inquired, I have 
 simply to state, that at the suggestion of the spirits a search was made 
 in the cellar; and although once discontinued on account of the 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 103 
 
 water wliicli flowed in from an adjoining creek, in the spring, was 
 afterwards resumed, and portions of a human skeleton found in the 
 locality designated by the spirits. 
 
 I now will read a narrative of events which occurred in the family 
 of John Wesley, at his residence at Epworth : 
 
 MEMORANDUM OF JOHN WESLEY, DETAILING THE GENERAL 
 ClRCUMSTiiNCES, OF WHICH ALL THE FAMILY WERE FREQUENT 
 
 WITNESSES. 
 
 '•Before it came into my room tlie latches weve fiequenily lifted up, the 
 ■windows clattered, and vfliateA'er iron or brass was about the chamber rung 
 and jarred exceedingly. When it was in any room, let them make what noise 
 they would, its dead, hollow note would be clearly heard above them all. 
 
 "The sound very ofien seemed in the air in the middle of the room; nor 
 could they make any such themselves by any contrivance. It never came by 
 day, till my mother ordered the horn to be blown. After that time, scarce 
 any one could go from one room to another, but the latch of the room they 
 went to was lifted up before thej'' touched it. From the time of vaj mother 
 desiring it not to disturb her from five to six, it was never heard in her cham- 
 ber till she came down stairs, nor at any time when she was employed in 
 devotion." — Fage 284 and 285 of Clark's Life of Wfislep. 
 
 As to the cause of these disturbances, Dr. Clark has the following: 
 
 " For some time the family believed it to be a trick ; but at last they were 
 all satisfied it was something supernatural : with others the house was con- 
 sidered as haunted. Mrs. Wesley's opinion was, probably, the most correct. 
 She supposed that these noises portended the death of her brother, then in 
 the East India Company's service. This gentleman, who had acquired a large 
 fortune, suddenly disappeared, and was never heard of more." — Paffe 287 to 
 289 of same book. 
 
 And as an appropriate addenda to this I will read another extract 
 from Wesley's sermon on Faith, as follows — page 470 : 
 
 "And how much will that add to the happiness of those spirits, who are 
 already discharged from the body, that they are permitted to minister to those 
 whom they have left behind ? An indisputable proof of this we have in the 
 twenty-second chapter of the Revelation. When the apostle fell down to 
 worship the glorious spirit which he seems to have mistaken for Christ, he 
 told him plainly, 'I am of thy fellow-servants, the prophets:" not God, not 
 an angel, but a human spirit." 
 
 I now wish to introduce a letter relative to the painting of portraits 
 
 by spirit agency, as follows : 
 
 La Salle, February 27, 1861. 
 
 Mr. a. B. Whiting, Albion, Dear Friend : You ask for a description of 
 the spirit portraits, taken by Mr. W. P. Anderson, of my friends in the spirit 
 world. 
 
 No. 1. A life size portrait of Joseph Level Larkin, who died November 15, 
 1840, twenty years last November. The picture is twenty-eight by thirty- 
 eight inches ; was taken in two hours and forty minutes. There is a wreath 
 round it, nearly two yards long, on which are twenty-nine roses, gracefully 
 thrown over the left arm, which is extended above the head, holding a 
 bouquet. In the other hand is a large bouquet of rare flowers. Several art- 
 ists have seen it, and admit it would take them, at least, six clays to copy the 
 wreath alone. The likeness is a good one. I recognized it in a moment on 
 
104 MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 seeing it, although I had two other boys nearly of the same age and size in 
 the spirit world, and had asked for the others and not this. 
 
 No. 2. Francis B. Larkin, died July 16, 1846 ; life size — same size as the 
 other. With his right hand he has gathered up his tunic and holding his 
 flowers ; the left is extended, catching the flowers as they drop from his 
 mother : far up in the clouds, directly above the child and partly over his 
 left, is seen his mother, so far up in the clouds, that, although she was eight 
 times larger than the boy, yet she appears not larger than his arm and hand. 
 Roses dropping from her hand at that hight appear about the size of a half of 
 a pea, and yet when they reach his hand are nearly or quite two inches across. 
 I have a miniature of the mother, taken before she died. The picture is so 
 perfect, that every one is struck with the resemblance of the two. On the 
 other side, and far above, appear the likenesses of his two little brothers. 
 This likeness is equally as good as the other. I call them both a good like- 
 ness of the two boys. 
 
 No. 3. Is the likeness of my mother's youngest sister, who died thirty-one 
 years ago — namely, July 17, 1830, aged twenty-four years. This is, also, a 
 good likeness. I recognize it as perfect as she appeared six months before 
 she died. 
 
 No. 4. Is a likeness of my wife's father, who died ten years ago, taken for 
 her before even that she so much as knew that likenesses were taken of the 
 spirits. She calls it a good likeness of her father. 
 
 No. 5. Is the likeness of a little girl, who died four years ago last summer, 
 aged four years. Of this the father, Mr. 0. N. Adams, says, he would not 
 have a pencil stroke diiferent. Others who knew the child recognize it as a 
 good likeness. 
 
 No. 6. Is the likeness of the same child as she now appears after four years 
 and a half in the spirit world. This looks much more spiritual and refined. 
 It is called by many Mr. Anderson's master piece. The most striking part of 
 this picture is the perfect shape of the arm, showing through drapery. 
 
 No. 7. Is Mrs. Darron, wife of Sidney Darron, who died eleven or twelve 
 years ago. Mr. Darron calls it a perfect likeness ; many others have recog- 
 nized it as Mrs. Darron, and a good likeness. The worked collar and dress, 
 also breast pin, are precisely like the one she wore in life time. 
 
 No. 8. A likeness of a Mrs. Scott, who died many years ago. This picture 
 was recognized before completed ; after which two good tests were attached : 
 first, she was hump-backed ; second, the peculiar manner she always wore 
 and tied a handkerchief around her neck. 
 
 No. 9 and 10 were the likenesses of Mrs. Cook and child, ten years old, 
 wife of Mr. A. G. Cook, of Ottawa, and their child. This is a magnificent 
 picture, life size, fully dressed as in life time. These figures were both taken, 
 their forms, dress, hands and arms : the boy's arm around the mother's waist, 
 the mother's arm around the boy and resting upon his left shoulder, the hand 
 and fingers showing perfect as in life ; and yet the mystery is not told : for 
 lo! neither heads were on their bodies — the pictures all completed, but head- 
 less. In a few hours afterwards the heads were placed upon their shoulders, 
 or rather between them, as perfect and natural as if first drawn, and then the 
 other parts drawn to correspond. My wife and I will both testify to this on 
 any and all occasions, as we both examined the pictures minutely in their 
 semi-completed condition. 
 
 No. 11. Is the likeness of a little boy, son of Mr. and the present Mrs. A. 
 S. Cook, of Ottawa, life size. This was taken in a nude state, with a light 
 sash or robe thrown across its loins, and showing every muscle in the sys- 
 tem as perfectly as can be shown by a Powers. The arms are held up, the 
 hand holding a basket of splendid flowers above his hand and hanging down 
 or drooping around him. This picture was also completed without the head. 
 We both saw this headless, and yet complete, but did not see it completed for 
 nearly or quite two weeks afterwards. These three last are acknowledged by 
 their friends as perfect likenesses. 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 105 
 
 No. 12. Was the daughter of Webster Laing, a full sized picture, very beau- 
 tiful. This picture has probably been recognized by more persons than any 
 yet taken. This picture was taken twenty-one miles from my house, at Mr. 
 Laing's, on the prairie. 
 
 I shall add two more to the number — farther than that I do not know as it 
 is any use to add more, though I might add a large number, taken and recog- 
 nised while at my house. 
 
 Mr. W. P. Anderson, with his lady, were at our house about three months 
 last fall, and all of the above save one, with some forty or fifty others, were 
 taken during that time. When he came to my house, the room was fitted up 
 for him, and darkened, thoroughly examined and carefully furnished by an 
 unbeliever, a member of the Baptist Church, and we can testify that all of the 
 apparatus used in making those pictures was simply a lead pencil and a 
 sheet of white paper. One of the pictures taken, which now hangs in our 
 house, was taken on Starved Rock, seven miles from home, in the presence of 
 Mr. John M. Turner, our Post Master, Mr. Holland, a Methodist Class Leader, 
 Mrs. Anderson and myself; it was an Indian, a Princess, as represented, 
 which we have no reason to doubt. I could give you a good test in regard to 
 this and another taken in the same place; but it will requii-e a lengthy report 
 to do the matter justice. 
 
 In the above descriptions I have intended to be truthful. If any one doubts 
 my statements, let him visit me, and I will do the best in my power to satisfy 
 him that at least I have not deceived intentionally. 
 
 I will say one word more. As the almighty dollar has more might in argu- 
 ment than anything else, I will now make to you, and through you to any of 
 your friends, an offer of one hundred dollars, for any person who will do the 
 work of three minutes in fifteen days, as neatly and as perfect as the copy, 
 which I will give them to follow. And when they have worked to their 
 heart's content, and find they cannot do it, if they will give me fifty dollars, 
 I will get the spirits to show, or rather do it for them, in the three minutes. 
 
 We have a picture that purports to be one of an Indian brave. The pic- 
 ture was taken in fifteen minutes, with all its paraphernalia. On the right 
 side of his cap or turban is a single goose quill or feather, which is run 
 through the band and sticks up above the head. 
 
 Now I propose to give to any person one hundred dollars who will put 
 through another feather, on the other side of the head, and through the band, 
 as perfect as the one on the right side — and they may lay the top of the 
 feather under the one already there, or over it, as they please. This whole 
 picture was taken in fifteen minutes ; they may have fifteen days to do but a 
 moiety of the work in it. 
 
 Who will do it ? 
 
 I will make another ofiFer. We have two pictures here, taken by Mr. An- 
 derson, around which is thrown a circle, or an elliptic, neither of which have 
 I described in the above. 
 
 I will give to any person one hundred dollars who will strike a circle or 
 elliptic which shall exactly fit on to that, in all its parts, with no instruments 
 but lead pencil and paper. I will allow them three hundred and sixty-five 
 days to do it in, they may work fifteen hours a day, taking seven days in the 
 week, and may have a pile of paper twenty feet high to experiment upon; 
 try as many times as they please, and as often ; may look at the picture as 
 much as they please, but are to take no measm-ements. When they have 
 tried sufficient, for fifty dollars I will have the same thing produced in three 
 seconds by the spirits, through Mr. Anderson. The above offer is made to any 
 one who will do it in his normal condition, without spirit aid. 
 
 With many kind wishes for your health and success. 
 
 I am, yours truly, 
 LYMAN B. LARKIN, M. D. 
 
 Fellow of the Mass. Medical Society. 
 
106 MODEEN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 LaSalle, Marcli 4, '61, 
 
 Mr. A. B. Whiting — Dear Friend: I promised you a description of two 
 more pictures : 
 
 No. 1 is the portrait of the father of our present Post Master, Mr. John M. 
 Turner. He left earth's plain forty years ago. It is a beautiful picture. It 
 resembles our Post Master very much, and yet we cannot recognize it, as he 
 died the same day ou which his son was born. 
 
 No. 2 is the portrait of Capt. Clark, of New Haven, Connecticut. This is 
 the largest picture as yet taken. All who knew him, who have seen it, re- 
 cognize it as a good likeness. Capt. Clark was a large man, a sea captain, 
 and had followed the sea for many years, but died at home. The picture is 
 taken full size — he is taken sitting in an arm chair, like the one he for years 
 used in his office, and is sitting at his table writing ; there are several of his 
 account books upon the table; his inkstand, the same he had used for years, 
 the cork taken out and standing upon its top, as was the old gentleman's cus- 
 tom always to place it; his telescope and compass both lying upon the table; 
 the table is covered with a damask cloth, the figures of which show jDlainly 
 as it hangs down in front of the table. The coat and vest, like the ones he 
 had worn for years, with the vest, a single breasted one, buttoned up to the 
 last button at the top, as he had always worn it for years ; shirt collar and 
 neck tie. Thus far, the picture is complete, but no head. And in that con- 
 dition the picture remained nearly two weeks, as seen by myself and wife. 
 After that, the head was set into the shirt collar as natural as life. When 
 the head was put on, he stood at the head and worked from the top of the 
 head down to the shirt collar. This picture purports to have been Mrs. M. 
 Turner's father. Mr. and Mrs. Turner both pronounce it a correct likeness 
 in every particular. Truly yours, 
 
 L. B. LARKIN. 
 
 We fully concur in the above statement. 
 
 JOHN H. McFAHr.AN. 
 J. Pt. McFAP.RAN. 
 
 All of tliis weight of testimoBy I consider a part of tlie great chain 
 of argnmentj wliicli leads us, irresistibly; to tlie conclusion, that these 
 manifestations are of spiritual origin. 
 
 My opponent has alluded to the fact, that sometimes prophecies 
 have been proven false. Mr. Davis has fully explained the apparent 
 plagarism in relation to the quotations from Horace Mann's lecture. 
 He had not seen the Tribune which contained it; he had remained 
 shut up in his room all the day he was in Cleveland; and the paper 
 containing the lecture arrived in Cleveland on the late train the night 
 he alluded to it. So of the theory of rain, which my friend accuses 
 him of stealing. The article of Mr. Davis is not enough like that 
 which he is accused of purloining, to be a plagarism. Mr. Davis 
 needs no endorsement from me. He is looked up to and respected 
 all over Europe and America, and his mild and truthful character 
 has always placed him above abuse. He has been attacked and has 
 received detraction and calumny, and has gone on the even tenor of 
 his way. When Glrimes and Mattison and Gordon and Felton and all 
 the other detractors of Spiritualism shall have been forgotten, the 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 107 
 
 name and memory of Andrew Jackson Davis ■will stand immortal, 
 ■with a tiara of glory sliiuing round liis liead. All tliat my opponent 
 can say can detract nothing from his reputation, or make a fla^w in his 
 spotless character, ■R^ho has lifted up his voice only to give expression 
 to "words of "wisdom and sincerity. 
 
 As to Dr. Redman, I can say that he asserts, and that N. C. Fol- 
 ger — ^who is the man "who accused him of being an imposter — admits 
 that he said to him, '■' Sir. you are a good physical medium ; but you 
 cheated me in the ballot-test." Folger demanded the raps, and be- 
 came angry because he could not obtain them. Eedmau, "who is a 
 timid man, became alarmed, and could at that time call no spirits to 
 his aid. 
 
 Here Mr. TThiting's time ex-pircd. 
 
 ME. JONES' CLOSINa AEGIUMENT. 
 
 Mr. Jones said — 
 
 My opponent must now be a-ware that he has arrived at the fall 
 end of his evidence. The rules of debate "will cut him ofi' no"w from 
 the introduction of any ne"w vnatter to "svhich I cannot reply. I trem- 
 bled in my seat "when he got u]) and came forAvard with his docu- 
 ments ; but still we stand, and now we have no fear. I "wish once 
 more to turn your attention and his to the question of the credibility 
 of his witnesses. I h.ive established the point by the best legal au- 
 thority, that where witnesses contradict each other, there is pn'ma 
 facia evidence of fraud. Novr, in volume 2, page 253 of Andrew 
 Jackson Davis' Eevelations, we read that the responses from the spirit 
 world are very conflicting. In the first place, a spirit infoi-ras 3Ir. 
 Ojrffany that the first or primary sphere in which the spirits dwelb is 
 three miles from the earth. A spirit, in the Mountain (Jove Journal, 
 says the first sphere is four miles from the earth ; Ballon says it is 
 seven miles away; Mrs. Frankhn says that the shining stars are the 
 homes of the spirits. Now hoAV delightfully they do agree ! In the 
 book called '-Supernal Tbeology," we are told that the seventh sphere 
 is four thousand miles from the earth ; Gridley says the first sphere 
 is five thousand miles away, and the sixth sphere thirty thousand miles 
 distant. Indians inhabit the second sphere, says the "Harmonia." 
 Mr. Hammond says this is not tnie. Spirits cannot pass through 
 
108 MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 solid substances, says a book called "Spirit Intercourse," on pages 
 125, 138 and 141. Here is Britton's statement of how one went in 
 and out of a locked trunk. Thus do we come on our opponent's own 
 ground, and confute bim by these endless contradictions, which, 
 according to the rules of evidence, destroy the credibility of his 
 witnesses. 
 
 Throughout this discussion we have endeavored to hold fast to the 
 question, demanding evidence to prove the negative position assumed 
 by my opponent. He has met us, just as the spiritualitss have always 
 met us before — by mocking us by coming here with his spiritual books 
 and his Banner of Liglit^ and by giving us nearly half an hour's dose 
 of letters about a man who took spiritual pictures. To overthrow our 
 position, my opponent should have proved that these manifestations 
 do originate with departed human beings. If these manifestations 
 occur in every town, as my friend has said they do, they should have 
 been produced here. He avoided complying with this demand, on 
 the pretended ground that the conditions could not be made right, 
 and that I am too antagonistic — thus actually confessing that I could 
 have the power to prevent even Miss Ada Hoyt from having her 
 manifestations here. Think of a poor, weak mortal like me prevent- 
 ing some high and powerful intelligence like Bacon or Locke from 
 communicating with humanity. " The conditions are not right," says 
 he. One condition is, that you must believe first and be receptive, 
 before you can get the evidence that will convince you — you have to 
 be gullible before you are gulled. I have met my opponent on his 
 own ground, and have shown that his witnesses are not reliable, and 
 that they contradict themselves. This I defy him to deny. If this 
 audience comprises men of intelligence, they will know that I have 
 kept close to the rules of evidence, and that I have had a right to 
 demand and insist upon the only class of evidence that would be con- 
 vincing, and which my opponent has refused to produce. 
 
 I can rest the debate here by reading the following eloquent expres- 
 sions of the Rev. T. L. Harris, once a Spiritualist, but now a minister 
 of the gospel — but far removed from me in the sublime mysticism of 
 Swedenborganism. The "Epic of the Starry Heavens " was written 
 by Mr. Harris when he was a Spiritualist ) but he has lived to see. 
 the delusion under which he then labored and to bear this eloquent 
 testimony against it : 
 
 "If I strip the veil from this horror, I have a right, as a Christian teacher, 
 60 to do. I but reiterate matters which the best informed of Spiritualists are 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 109 
 
 as fully acquainted witli, as that media speak, or that tables move. I do it, 
 not for the purpose of exciting prejudice against the spiritual movement of 
 the age, but rather because I view these things as the confused shapes and 
 .images of darkness, rolled up from Infernus, to delude as many as possible 
 into a corrupt and ruinous belief in spiritual sorceries and delusions ; and so 
 to disgust all, whom they cannot thtis infatuate, as to induce them to remain 
 neutral in the great coming fight between the Spiritualists of Heaven and the 
 Spiritualists of Hell. Murdei% adultery, suicide, and the most revolting blas- 
 phemies, may be traced directly to the communications and puttings forth of 
 impure spirits, both in ancient and in modern times. But those which the 
 most external observer can thus trace, serve merely as the visible bubbles that 
 show the current of the 
 
 "And, so far as I am able to jtidge, the majority of such instances are trace- 
 able to the habit of attending sceances. I earnestly call attention to this point. 
 The man of iron nerves may say that he feels no change of state. He may 
 laugh dowe the idea of peril. With him it is but a question of time. The 
 vitriol that eats in a day through iron wire, has but to continue the process to 
 eat through the iron bar. It is slow, this poison, but it is sure. I lift the 
 alarum cry of danger. It is not safe, unless there is a Divine use and value 
 in the act, and so unless it is in the order of Providence, either to submit to 
 a spirit's influence, or to participate in circles for sj^irit manifestations. * * 
 
 "As with a voice from the secret chambers, where the fair, the young, the 
 virtuous, the unsuspecting, from the mere habit of attending the sceance, have 
 felt the foul contact of the larvte from perdition, I cry to all, 'Shun the 
 sceance, where the unregenerate, or giddy, or worldly, or volatile and careless 
 medium officiates as the mediator and opener of the door between the 
 natural and unseen worlds. If you do not wish to become yourselves demo- 
 niacs, shun the place and shun the occasion.' To the pure, to those who 
 would remain pure, I can hint such reasons as, if uttered, would make every 
 ear tingle." 
 
 That is the expression of one who came from the dark realms of 
 Spirituahsm one year ago. I say to you, adding my voice to his and 
 praying Heaven to give strength to it, as you love Truth and Justice, 
 as you would not mock the hopes of those who seek a true revelation 
 from heaven, shun the seance, and look upon its tricks and fantasies 
 as you do upon those of jugglery. You can't ex^in the Wizard's 
 tricks ; and yet you are called upon to give up your Bible, truth, and 
 all holy things for, this despicable jugglery. The Bible, the church, 
 and Heaven are to be surrendered for it. Spiritualists abuse that 
 blessed book. Let them : it will stand firm as the pillars of Heaven j 
 and notwithstanding all the contumely that Spiritualism may heap 
 upon it, it will still stand forth a bright and shining light, making the 
 sons of the morning to shout for joy, bringing liberty to the captives 
 and the opening of the prison-doors to those who are bound. I have 
 given my voice against resting our faith upon the delusive and shal- 
 low basis of Spiritualism ; and I have shown to you, to the extent of 
 my ability and strength, that the claims of Spiritualism are false and 
 the very height of folly. 
 
 I would say in conclusion, that I have the kindest feelings toward 
 my opponent. If I have, in the debate, offended the feelings of any 
 
110 MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 one, I ask Lis forgiveness, as lie Liopes to be forgiven of God. I 
 have been necessitated to draw forth these things. I hope that time 
 will come when my opponent can see a clearer light than that which 
 how guides him, and that we shall yet sing together in that celestial 
 sphere where all is purity and truth. I accord to him eminent 
 ability; but I deny his inspiration. There is no insincerity in my 
 words when I say that he is the ablest Spiritualist I have ever met 
 with or read of. I pay him this compliment in all sincerity j and 
 with gratitude for the manner in which he has conducted this debate. 
 Truth is the ultimatum we both are striving to reach; and the path 
 which we pursue to reach that goal, is of but- little moment, so that 
 at last the wished-for Rock is found. 
 Here Mr. Jones' time expired. 
 
 MS. WHITINa'S CLOSE. 
 
 Mr. Whiting said : 
 
 I thank my opponent for the high compliment he has paid me. 
 More than this I will not now say. Whether it be deserved or not, is 
 not relevant to the question. From the beginning to the end of this 
 discussion, we have endeavored to keep close to the subject, and to 
 produce the very best evidence, oral, written and printed, which 
 could be afforded of the truth of our position. It all stands on re- 
 cord there. It is indisputable. My opponent demands that Mr. 
 Anderson, the sflrit picture painter, shall prove that these pictures 
 are the works of spirits. We answer that they prove that themselves, 
 by the internal evidence they carry with them. The artist who 
 painted these pictures is a young man, and many of the portraits 
 are those of old men, who died before he was born. And then the 
 pictures were painted in so short a time, that no earthly hands could 
 achieve the task. These beautiful pictures, as they hang in the 
 parlors of their owners, are living testimonials of the power of the 
 spirits to control us. They are the pictures of the departed, and 
 they speak the language of the other life. One of them, the picture, 
 of an Indian maiden, unfolds all the mournful and romantic history 
 of the famous •' Starved Rock," on which she died. These are evi- 
 dences that come home to every soul. As to the other evidences I 
 have adduced; the prophecy that my opponent has deemed false ; has 
 
MODEEN SPIRITUALISM. Ill 
 
 not this proplieey of a man who should arise in Europe, " who should 
 he a traitor to his King, but a true man to his God," been most fully 
 and remarkably fulfilled in the advent of Graribaldi. the liberator of 
 Italy ; traitor, it is true, to his King, the tyrant of the Sicilies, but a 
 true man to his God ? And did not the death of the Emperor of 
 Russia, who is more than suspected to have been poisoned, fulfill the 
 other portion of this remarkable spiritual prophecy ? 
 
 I will not notice at length the other portions of my opponent's 
 closing appeal, with the exception of his quotation from Mr. Harris, 
 That quotation refers to what Mr. Harris calls " disorderly spirits," 
 and after he had written the words which my friend has quoted from 
 him, Mr. Harris wrote strongly and fervently in favor of the revela- 
 tions which were received from "orderly spirits." He discriminates 
 between orderly and disorderly spirits, and while he denounces the 
 latter, he approves of the former. We do not endorse Mr. Harris. 
 He is a beautiful writer, and Avhile under the spirit influence, wrote 
 some beautiful poetry; but, notwithstanding this, he is erratic and 
 anxious after popularity and power. 
 
 With all due respect to my opponent, he has contradicted himself 
 many times in this discussion. Sometimes he has denounced all 
 Spiritualists as fools, idiots, or demented persons. Again he has ad- 
 mitted them to be intelligent; and in conclusion, he warns you to 
 beware of their tempting and seductive impostures, and to strive for 
 something better and holier than they can give you. 
 
 He wound up with an argument which every clergyman always 
 uses in such a discussion : keep away from the sceance, he exclaims, 
 lest you be mixed up with demons I That is the best conclusion for 
 all opponents of Spiritualism to arrive at, in the opinion of my friend. 
 Keep away! Beware of the sceance! beware of imposture! beware 
 of self-deceived and deceivers ! This is the universal motto of the 
 Church and Clergy. But with all their precautions, many of them 
 have been converted to Spiritualism. That system of belief stands 
 to-day with four millions of converts in xlmerica, and many thousands 
 in all the countries of Europe. Among these converts are such men 
 as Edmonds, Tallmadge, Simmons, Dr. Hare, and others, of giant 
 intelligence and profound education — not at all gullible. It has re- 
 mained for my friend here in Decatur to say that to be a Spiritualist, 
 one must be gullible or demented. Does it become him in this man- 
 ner to impugn the character of such men as Dr. Hare, Robert Dale 
 Owen, Hon. S. S. Jones, of Illinois, the learned Doctors of New 
 
112 MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 
 
 York, and others like them, who are Spiritualists ! Does it become 
 him to say that it is necessary for one to be gullible before he can 
 become a Spiritualist ? Judge Edmonds was recently asked to be- 
 come Recorder of the city of New York; he declined the oiFer upon 
 reasons so just and praiseworthy that all the press of New York 
 were compelled to praise him ; and yet this is a man who is so de- 
 mented and insane as to be a confirmed Spiritualist ! The well known 
 Lithographist, of Perkins & Co., of Hartford, whose maps and pic- 
 tures are to be seen in every town, has been a devoted Spiritualist for 
 many years. Great mental skill and good judgment is required in 
 the art, which he prosecutes so successfully, and yet he is so gullible 
 and weak as to be a Spiritualist. Sharpe, the inventor of the cele- 
 brated rifle which bears his name, is a Spiritualist, and he says that 
 he invented his rifle by spiritual impression. His establishment, 
 which is a large and important one, is managed by a company of 
 Spiritualists. All these facts are parts of our chain of evidence. I 
 do not mention a tithe of the distinguished names I could enumei*ate, 
 which are borne by Spiritualists. Does it become my opponent, here 
 in this little village of Decatur, to say that all these men are neces- 
 sarily gullible ? The shades of the departed dead have, for the last 
 twelve years, developed the few mediums which existed twelve years 
 ago, into many thousands, scattered all over the country. They stand 
 as living witnesses, as a grand phalanx, as a mighty army, in defence 
 of the truth of spiritual intercourse. 
 
 I have adduced the names I have mentioned to show that the in- 
 telligent and wealthy of this and other countries, are to be found 
 among the ranks of the Spiritualists. If this be so, and we can 
 number among us savans, men of imperial station, and those whom 
 the Pope of Rome trembles before, as they act through Napoleon, 
 Emperor of France — for not only are spiritual mediums kept con- 
 stantly in the palace of the TuUeries, te advise the Emperor, and to 
 warn him of coming dangers — sometimes saving his life by their in- 
 formation — ^but the Emperor himself is an impressionable medium, 
 and acts by spirit influence in his struggle against the Pope; and 
 that mighty mind who swings the sword of Italy in his hand, and 
 controls her destinies, is also a Spiritualist : if all these things are so, 
 we say, it shows that there is candor, intellect, wealth, power, intelli- 
 gence and skill upon the side of Spiritualism ; and notwithstanding 
 all that my friend has said about the necessary gullibility of Spiritu- 
 alists, I think my spiritual friends find themselves in good company 
 
MODERN SPIRITUALISM. 113 
 
 at least. Spiritualism is among you with its power and beauty, sink- 
 ing down deep into the heart of humanity. The spirits tell us of 
 that which they do know, and they do not contradict themselves. As 
 if one should come to this world from a distant star, and alighting on 
 the prairies of Illinois, would return and describe the earth as a great 
 level plain; while another, alighting on the mountains of the Oregon, 
 would describe it as a region of majestic hills; they might seem to 
 contradict each other — but they would only speak of the world as 
 they each had seen it. So of the spirits ; they testify only as to what 
 they know. If one tells you that he lives sixty miles away, and 
 another that he lives seven millions of miles distant, it is a difference 
 of state and aspiration. Some may wish to go to the distant planets, 
 and others may wish to spend their time on earth, to benefit humanity. 
 
 My opponent said that he did not care what Wesley, St. Paul, or 
 Christ said. But Wesley said that it was a glorious privilege for a 
 spirit to return to earth, to benefit humanity. Yes, it is indeed a 
 glorious privilege. In the dim ages of the past we see this. The 
 Hindoo Chrisna. the Demon of Socrates, the visions of Plato, the 
 wise axioms of Pythagoras and Zenophon, teach us that spiritual 
 communion with the dead is not hypothetical ; but that it is a tele- 
 graph that reaches from Pleaven to earth. Do you not get all the 
 information you can of a distant land to which you expect to jour- 
 ney ? Then investigate Spiritualism, for it tells you of a land in 
 which you are to dwell forever; and the more yoii know of it, the 
 better you will be prepared to enjoy it. Soon you will all be spirits, 
 and you will then be just as anxious to watch over and befriend those 
 loved ones you leave behind you, as the spirits now are to watch over 
 and befriend you. As you remember the cold word, and the sneer, 
 and the heartless taunt which you gave to the Spiritualist on earth, 
 your souls may be darkened. But if you train your minds to the 
 reception of these truths, you will gain a glorious victory over all 
 your chilling doubts and fears. 
 
 My opponent has likened Spiritualism to the Lya^nian Hydra. The 
 comparison was apt. Spiritualism is like the Hydra in one respect : 
 its arguments are Kke it. All the Rogers and Mattisons and G-rimes 
 and Jones may hew away at the heads of Spiritualism's arguments ; 
 they may call in vain on Heaven, and they may search fruitlessly on 
 earth to find a Hercules who can destroy this Hydra. No sooner do 
 they fancy that they have destroyed one of its arguments, than two 
 others, more potent, spring up in its stead. But, unlike the Hydra, 
 
114 MODERN SPIRITUALISM. ' 
 
 Spiritualism does not destroy humanity. On the contrary, nothing 
 satisfies so well the wants of humanity, at this time, as does 
 Spiritualism. 
 
 We think that we have shown that the manifestations of modern 
 Spiritualism are not hypothetical in their origin. My opponent has 
 paid a high compliment to the Bible. I wish that it could have been 
 used in this debate. I love all the truths which it contains ; and I 
 could have found much in it to sustain my position. But I met my 
 opponent on his own ground, conceded to his resolution, and accepted 
 his rules; and on this platform I have met him, hemmed in by these 
 rules, and obliged to adduce evidecce wholly confined to modern Spir- 
 itualism. The time may come when we may adduce, in your hearing, 
 the arguments which the rules of this debate have forbidden. My 
 understanding of the Bible is as much my right, as my friend's 
 understanding of that book is his right. 
 
 Spiritualism still lives! Gallileo, after his forced renunciation of 
 his theory of the motion of the earth, exclaimed. "But it does move !" 
 All the Pope Urbans cannot help it. "Wherever there is a rap, there 
 is a rogue,'' says my friend. No ! The divine light of the angel 
 world, while the fires of nature continue to burn, and the human soul 
 continues to aspire to a higher and a purer life, will reveal to us the 
 pearly gates which open upon a world that is only the continuatioa 
 of our present dwelling place, and reveal fully the glories by which 
 Spiritualism, like a circle of divine life, encompasses the world. 
 
 Here Mr. Whiting's time expired, and the Moderator pronounced 
 that the debate had closed. 
 
 i Mj S 181)2 
 
POSTSCRIPT. 
 
 Mr. Jones having, subsequently, furnished the copy of the com- 
 munication from Patrick Murphy, and the extract from Judge 
 Edmond's book on Spiritualism, but too late for insertion in the proper 
 place, we insert them here. — Reporter. 
 
 EXTRACT FROM THE BANNER OF LIGHT— "PATRICK MURPHY." 
 
 "Faith that's a nice time I had to meself Easther Sunday. Mary made a 
 fool o' herself; she moved every divil o' a thing out o' the house intirely — 
 gone to another place, ■where they think the divil can't go. The praist has 
 blessed ; but faith his blessing will go no further than his mouth. I could 
 have blessed it as Tvell meself intirely ; the Catholics think too much o' the 
 praist's blessing. I came here to-day to tell Mary I can go to the place where 
 she is and move the things just as well as ever. The Lord God, or some o' 
 the saints, give her medium powers, and God blesses me all the time to use 
 them ; an' when she'll sit down an' talk to me daicent, I'll behave meself. I 
 was standing forninst her this morning. She says it could not be meself at. 
 all, but it was the divil— put that down, God bless you, an' Mary will see that 
 it was meself that was there. 
 
 "All I've got to say before I go is, tell Mary I'm as happy as a duck in the 
 rain. When she thrates me daicent, I'll behave meself — that's all. Good by." 
 
 JUDGE EDMOND'S SAW MILL SCENE. 
 
 "The saw mill was at work, with four saws a-going; but I did not see 
 around it any of the litter which I have been accustomed to here : no loose 
 piles of slabs, no heaps of saw dust, no decaying logs, but everything was 
 neat and orderly. The logs were piled up in heaps, and so arranged as to 
 look very handsome. They were arranged in piles. I counted the base : it 
 consisted of eight logs, then above that layer seven, and then six, and so on 
 up to a point. All their rubbish and dirt, I observed, were carried off by a 
 sewer, dug underground, and terminating at the precipice I have already 
 mentisned. By means of a waste weir, all the rubbish was carried off that 
 way, and the water passed clear and pure down through the farm. When I 
 approached, they were sawing a large log with the whole four saws. It was 
 a singular kind of wood — something like the birds-eye maple, but the spots 
 were larger, and the wood susceptible of a higher polish. Each board, as it 
 came from the saw, was finely polished and smoothed ; and I examined to see 
 how that was done. The back of each saw was as thick as its front edge, 
 and so constructed, that it smoothed and polished, as it went along, the rough- 
 ness which the teeth had made. The mill itself was a beautiful structure : it 
 was a Doric Temple, with two rows of columns, open entirely at the sides, 
 and a roof that projected over both at the ends and at the sides. He had 
 time enough to build, and had taken care to ornament it. Just beyond this 
 mill I saw a pasture, in which horses and cows were grazing, and through it 
 ran a stream of water." — Spiritualism by Edmonds and Dexter. 
 
MODERN SPIEITDAMSM, 
 
 BEING A DEBATE 
 
 HELD AT 
 
 DECATUR, MICHIGAN, 
 
 March l^tli, 13th, and 14rth, 1861, 
 
 BETWEEN 
 
 MR. A. B. WHITING AND REY. JOS. JONES, 
 
 UPOX THE QUESTION' 
 
 " R^olved., Tliat the origin of" IVToclerrL Spirit^lal plieixomena, is 
 
 entirely liy-potlietical, and. therefore, the revelations 
 
 froxn that soiarce are not at all reliahle." 
 
 Reported by C. C. FLINT, 
 
 Of the " Chicago Daily Democrat." 
 
 GHICAaO 
 
 S. p. ROUNDS, STEAM BOOK AND JOB PRINTING HOUSE, 46 STATE STREET. 
 
 1861. ^->' .^ 
 
Oi, 
 

 
 12- 
 
 
 
 
 S>:>>.'l> -^>13^ 35^^^~:>- 
 
 '^>^:^t^f 
 
 
 
 
 -j^ 5^ >:> 
 
 
 ^ ^JX>».5- 
 
 g-^^A 
 
 -5^:. >23 
 
 w::^ 
 
 ^-i>:>2>-^ 
 
 ^J»I 
 
 ) 2:>_>» :. 
 
 »iJg» 
 
 )^i>J>»:2j 
 
 9'>J^ 
 
 --j>j)^..'j* 
 
 * '^39*-'-- 
 
 3> >» ■-> 
 
 J»>'^ 
 
 ):i)^J»»^ 
 
 -^;:s>^ ;i3»?- 
 
 
 
 •> 
 
 
 
 
 
 S^ITi 
 
 ■^,.>_Jw.i» 
 
 s»^> 
 
 )>)'> '» '» 
 
 So^ 
 
 !>->.3»'.:» 
 
 P5;rr^ 
 
 ,>,> )2>>l3i» ^ 
 
 >» ,^ 
 
 
 yp ^' 
 
 ^ »/■ JJ» -» 
 
 
 Deacid f,ed using the Bookkeeper process 
 Neutralizing agent: Magnesium Oxkie 
 Treatment Date; Nov. 2004 
 
 PreservationTechnoloqies 
 
 1 1 1 Thomson Park Drive 
 Cranberry Township. PA 16066 
 (724)779-2111 
 

 
 
 
 ^3^ 
 
 ^ >^ 
 
 
 
 ^^?^ 
 
 ;>^ 
 
 :x>2 
 
 
 
 
 - »5» ' 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 «>^:>:>:s>j> >:«».-> 
 
 
 3^^>3> J^-io.S* .:»*»:» - . rl 
 
 s>;» ^j^ >J* ^i^Jifcg^ :> __^> > " 
 
 
 
 
 ^•►^s^ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 *> :> >jg>>^ 
 
 
 >>- -> >*•* '-, 
 
 
 
 > > >> ^ T»> ' 
 
 
 
 
 '> »?> >^,J>->