Qass. Book. A Semi-Centennial ' OF THE l.i. Lincoln- -Douglas Debates in Illinois 1858-1908 CIRCULAR OF SUGGESTIONS FOR SCHOOL CELEBRATIONS Prepared by a Committee from the Advisory Commission to the Board of Directors of the Illinois State Historical Library Issued by F. G. BLAIR, Superintendeat of Public Instruction TB«otvJTS!'rcov«ta.>8< SPsmorrUiD, iLuifois PHTLLIPS BBOB., STATB PBITSTBaS . 1908 Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction, Springfield, Illinois^ March i, 1908. To the Teachers and Pupils of Illinois: In publishing this well selected and valuable collection of material on the Lincoln-Douglas debates the Department of Public Instruction does itself an honor and the children of the State a distinct service. Its preparation has required the time and energy of busy, capable men and I am sure that the teachers and pupils will fully appreciate the ser- vices rendered. Although purely a labor of love on their part, I firmly believe that the assurance that they have aroused in the minds of the children of Illinois a keener interest in and a better understanding of this really great event will be an ample and a satisfactory reward for their eflfort. The topic for the essay to be prepared for the educational exhibit of the State fair by pupils of the graded schools and high schools for this year is the Lincoln-Douglas debates. This circular will provide these pupils with the right sort of material to use in the writing of these essays. It is requested that at least one copy of this pamphlet be placed in every school library in the State. Yours sincerelv, Snperintoident of Public Instruction. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS, 1858. CIRCULAR 24 Semi-Centennial OF THE Lincoln - Douglas Debates in Illinois 1858-1908 CIRCULAR OF SUGGESTIONS FOR SCHOOL CELEBRATIONS Prepared by a Committee from the Advisory Commission to the Board of Directors of the Illinois State Historical Library EDWIN E. SPARKS. Chairman. University of Chicaoo. JAMES A. JAMES, Northwestern University. EDWARD C. PAGE. Northern Illinois State Normal School. Issued by F. G. BLAIR, Superintendenl of Public Instruction Springfield, Illinois PHfLLiPS Bros.. State Printers. 1908 E4. 4 "^X. oiiikni 0- Of \<, TABLE OF CONTENTS. Page. Suggestions to teachers 6 Introduction 7 Origin and Outcome of the Debates 9 An Eastern Reporter's View of Western Stump Speaking 11 As a Republican Reporter Saw It 12 now Douglas reached Illinois 14 The Great Debate (from the Crisis) 14 The Deljate and the Debaters (from The Illini) 16 Birthplace of Douglas 18 Stephen A. Douglas, by Samuel P. Orth 19 Stephen A. Douglas, bj- Joseph A. Wallace 20 Abraham Lincoln, by David B. Locke 20 Lincoln and Douglas, by Cassius M. Clay 21 Contrast between Lincoln and Douglas, by Gen. James B. Fry 22 Douglas and Lincoln, by Stephen B. Warden 22 The Lincoln-Douglas Debates ' 22 The Great Debate, by Samuel P. Orth 23 As an Eastern Reporter Saw Them 25 How Douglas travelled 25 As Douglas appeared at close of debates 26 Selections from the debates 26 Lincoln and Douglas at Freeport ; a dialogue 28 Old Dan Tucker 34 A Douglas Song 34 Oh, you can't go the Caper, Stephen 34 W^ide Awake Club song 35 For Good Little Democrats 35 A Boy's Wish • • 35 A Douglas to the Fray 36 Douglas' Complaint 36 Uncle Abe 36 Emerson on Lincoln s Literary Ability 37 Dedication of Gettysburg Battle Field 37 A Last Glimpse of the Rivals 37 Bury Me in the Morning, by Stephen A. Douglas 38 Last Words of Douglas 38 Bibliography 3» SUGGESTIONS TO THE TEACHERS OF ILLINOIS. The year 1908 witnesses the semi-centennial anniversary of the memorable debate between Stephen A. Douglas and Abraham Lincoln for the vacant United States Senatorship from Illinois ; but in reality the prize was larger because each became a candidate for the presi- dency two years later. Under the direction of the Illinois Historical Society, celebrations will be held this year in each of the seven places where the debates took place and on the exact day, viz : Ottawa, August 21; Freeport, August 27; Jonesboro, Sept. 15; Charleston, Sept. 18; Galesburg, Oct. 7; Quincy, Oct. 13; Alton, Oct. 15. Public attention will thus be drawn to this important event in Illinois history, and the time seems suited to a study of the debates, their origin and results, and the topics they mainly discussed. While the debates belong properly to local history, in their results they became a part of national history. To devote one or more days of the present year to a study of the debates and the debaters would seem to be time well spent. It was not the purpose of the compilers of this pamphlet to make programs for celebrating special days, but to furnish materials from which programs could be made. Only such selections as bear directly on the debates have been included, with possibly one or two exceptions. The literature on both Lincoln and Douglas is voluminous and can be drawn upon at will to supplant the material here given. Teachers can arrange the selections in this pamphlet as readings or recitations or songs in many ways to make up an attractive program for an after- noon. Some of the descriptions lend themselves naturally for readings by the teacher to the pupils, with such explanations as will make the scenes intelligible to the youthful imagination. For additional matter bearing on the debates, consult the list of books printed in this pam- phlet. The list is not intended to be exhaustive, but such volumes have been selected as are likely to be had in any community. If this booklet proves serviceable to the teachers of the State, the compilers will be compensated for their labor of love. Edward C. Page. James A. James, Edward C. Page. INTRODUCTION. Abraham Lincoln was born in Hardin county, Kentucky, Feb. 12, 1809. Little is known of his boyhood which was passed in the midst of most desolate surroundings. The family moved to Indiana when "Abe" was seven years old ; twelve years later they emigrated to Illinois, settling near Decatur. Privation, trial and labor he knew intimately in those days. All told, he attended schools, such as they were, about a year. Dur- ing the intervals of his work, he is said to have read, written and ciphered incessantly. Although knowledge was not acquired rapidly by him, he mastered such books as he could procure. Among these were the Bible, Aesop's Fables, Pilgrim's Progress, and a history of the United States. As a laborer, much sought after because of his strength and intelli- gence, he showed the characteristics for which he was always noted, such as generosity, courage, honesty, ready wit, sympathy and fair- mindedness. Flat-boatmen, surveyor and store-keeper in turn, he was, at the age of twenty-seven, admitted to the practice of law. He became the most eminent jury lawyer in Illinois, but his interest was in poli- tics. No speaker was more popular or effective. Elected to Congress in 1847, he became noted for his anti-slavery views. As he himself said, he "voted in favor of the Wilmot Proviso in one way or another about forty times." To the great disappointment of Mr. Lincoln, Lyman Trumbull defeated him for the United States Senate in 1855. But his career really began when during the summer of 1858 he met Stephen A. Douglas in joint debate. Objection was made by some of his friends to the statement he proposed to include in his speech accepting the nomination, which was as follows: "A house divided again?t itself can not stand, I believe this government can not endure permanently half slave and half free." When objection was made by his friends, he replied, "Gentlemen, I have thought much on this and it must remain. If it must be that I go down because of this speech, then let me go down linked to truth. This nation can not live on injustice — a house divided against itself can not stand. I say it again and again." Such an outspoken statement of his convictions was to make him, although defeated by Douglas for the senate, the candidate of the northwest for the presidency in i860. 8 Stephen A. Douglas was born in Brandon, Vermont, April 23, 1813, the son of a physician. His mother was left a widow when Stephen was a child, and when grown he was compelled to work on a farm to aid in supporting the family, attending school only during the winter months. He also learned the trade of cabinet maker. Determinmg to make his own way in the world, he came to Illinois when he was twenty years of age. Being admitted to the bar and entering politics, he became a typical man of the west, always contending for the rights of that section. The men of his time speak of his fearlessness and his quickness of apprehension ; his strong will and indomitable energy. His education was imperfect, but he overcame all obstacles by an imperious determination to succeed. Preferment came to him so often that his asking almost signified the granting by the people. The offices of Attorney General of Illinois, legislator, Secretary of State and Judge of the Supreme Court were given to him within the space of eight years. Three times he was elected to the House of Representa- tives and was serving a second term in the United States Senate when his place was contested by Mr. Lincoln, a situation which led to the great debate between the two. His ambition prompted him to attempt to win national regard by advocating the theory that the people of Kansas should be allowed to determine for themselves whether they would come into the Union a free or slave state. Being short of statute and yet of powerful physical strength, had won for Douglas the nickname of the "Little Giant." The debate was said to be a contest between "Old Abe" and the "Little Giant." At the close of the debate the election was held which chose a ma- jority of the State Legislature favorable to Douglas instead of Lincoln and the former was consequently returned to the Senate. Two years later he was nominated by one branch of the Democratic party for the presidency and was therefore an unsuccessful candidate against his old rival, Lincoln. Although an intense partisan, he was a more intense patriot and immediately upon the breaking out of the war, he tendered his services to President Lincoln. He died in 1861 and lies buried on the lake shore in Chicago. The Origin and the Outcome of the Debates. When Lincoln ended his single term m Congress in March i^, he retired to his law practice and gave it more exclusive attention than ever before. During the next five years he was gradually losing hLinte'rest in politics, !s he himself tells us The Pa-age of the Kansas-Nebraska Act, in May 1854, fathered by bcnator l^ouglas, with its repeal of the Missouri Compromise, changed his whole atti^ tude Imniediatelv he was "aroused," as he expressed t. His strong patriotism and his' high conception of legal and --a. justice msp^^^^^ him with a new zeal and he was soon addressing pohtcal gatherings. Gen rallv the readv wit and broad humor of the speeches ot former days were missing. Instead, the listeners were moved by new earnest^ ness aTid seriousness of argument. Passing by personal issues, leaving unmen^ned the policies Sf the day, Lincoln fixed his attention ivpon the Kansas-Nebraska question ; consequently, he came to be regarded p's the natural antagonist of Douglas. ' "At the St^te fair^vith its usual PoHtical tournament these leaders came into conflict. Douglas made a speech on the first dav of the far to which Lincoln re^pHed the next day and Douglas made re- joinder. A few days late!- they met again at Peoria, by arrangement. And so the issues were joined. • ,^„ ^f ,u^ -Rf^nnbli- Two years later, on the occasion of the organizaton of tbe Repubh can party at Bloomington, Lincoln "^^de an impassioned speech^^hch fixed once for all his position as popular leader of the anti slavery .entiment of Illinois. The civil "war m Kansas and the D^^d ^co" decision only served to arouse Lincoln to earnestness more intense than 'In June. 1857. at Springfield. Douglas made a" elaborate speh^ Kansas and the Dred Scott decision. Two weeks later at th. same ^^ce Lincoln made a telling replv. Thus again the great P-tago-st oined issues as thev approached the campaign of t8,8. in xshicn a successor to Senator Douglas was to be elected. Of course Douglas had no rival in his own party and ot course the Republicans could think of no one else as their candidate except I hio'ir who alone of all of the men of the lay. had with any scucess mrS^uglas in political discussion. The endorsement of Lincoln was made by the Republican state convention June \h. ijs.,s. lO On the evening of that day Lincohi accepted the candidacy in a speech which was one of the most carefully wrought out and perhaps the most important of his whole life. It sounded the keynote of the entire contest. We quote the opening sentences: "If we could first know where we are, and whither we are tending, we could better judge what to do now, and how to do it. We are now far into the fifth year since a policy was initiated with the avowed object and con- fident promise of putting an end to slavery agitation. Under the operation of that policy, that agitation has not only not ceased, but has constantly augmented. In my opinion, it will not cease until a crisis shall have been reached and passed. 'A house divided against itself can not stand.' I believe this government can not endure permanently half slave and half free. I do not expect the Union to be dissolved; I do not expect the house to fall; but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing, or all the other. Either the opponents of slavery will arrest the further spread of it, and place it where the public mind shall rest in the belief that it is the course of ultimate extinction, or its advocates will push it forward till it shall become alike lawful in all the states, old as well as new, north as well as south." His closing sentences ring out like a battle cry : "Our cause must be entrusted to, and conducted by, its own undoubted friends — those whose hands are free, whose hearts are in the work, who do care for the result. Two years ago the Republicans of the nation mustered over thirteen hundred thousand strong. We did this under the single impulse of resistance to a common danger, with every external circumstance against us. Of strange discordant, and even hostile elements we gathered from the four winds, and formed and fought the battle through, under the constant hot fire of a disciplined, proud, and pampered enemy. Did we brave all then, to falter now — now, when that same enemy is wavering, dissevered and belligerent? The result is not doubtful. We shall not fail — if we stand firm, we shall not fail.. Wise counsels may accelerate, or mistakes delay it; but sooner or later the victory is sure to come." The battle was soon on. Douglas assumed the offensive and Lincoln dogged his every foot-step. Douglas made speeches at Chicago, Bloomington and Springfield in quick succession. Lincoln followed him at Chicago and Springfield with addresses of much force. But it was evident that Douglas, with his air of superiority, his elusive strategy in argumentation, his sentimental methods, was bound to defeat any efifort to secure honest investigation or intelligent discus- sion and so was gaining an unfair advantage. Consequently, Lincoln and his managers determined to challenge Douglas to a formal debate of the questions at issue. The challenge was accepted and the terms easily agreed upon. The two men were to meet at one place in each of seven congressional districts : Ottawa, Freeport, Jonesboro, Charleston, Galesburg, Quincy and Alton. They had already spoken in the dis- tricts in which Chicago and Springfield were located. Douglas was to speak one hour at Ottawa. Lincoln to reply for one hour and a half, and Douglas to make a half hour's rejoinder. Lincoln was to open and close at Freeport, and so on alternately. This gave Douglas four openings and closings and Lincoln only three; but Lincoln agreed to it, probably not altogether out of good nature, for in regard to a similar arrangement on an occasion several years Ijefore, he said "My consenting to it was not wholly unselfish, for I suspected, if it were understood that the judge was entirely II done, you Democrats would leave and not hear me ; but by giving hint the close, I felt confident you would stay for the fun of hearing him skin me." Soon after the debates were begun it was evident that Douglas was now on the defensive. Under the impartial rules of debate and con- fronted by audiences made up of friend and foe, his artful expedients, his adroit evasion, his equivocal logic were no match for the keen analysis, the unerring logic, the concise statement, the profound earnestness and the fervid eloquence of his opponent. And so the campaign was fought and the election for members of the Legislature was held. The Republican ticket received 125,430 votes, and the Douglas ticket 121,609. But by virtue of an unfair legislative apportioniuent, the Democrats had 54 votes on joint ballot in the General Assembly and the Republicans only 46. So Douglas was re-elected Senator. Such were the immediate results of the contest. The indirect results were far reaching. In the first place, Lincoln had compelled Douglas to declare that the people of a territory, in spite of the Dred Scott de- cision, might contrive to keep slavery out of the territory. This greatly angered the south and irrevocably set that section against Douglas' aspirations for the presidency. As a result, the Democratic party was irreparably rent in twain in i860. In the second place, with Douglas, of Illinois, as the northern Democratic candidate for the presidency in i860, the Republicans were compelled to nominate an Illinois candidate, if they hoped to carry the State, and of course that state was necessary to secure national success. Therefore, the logic of the situation compelled the nominati' n of Lincoln, the only man who had ever met Douglas successfully in de- bate ; the only man who had won more votes than he in a ])opular election. It is not fulsome praise to say that from the standpoint both of forensic merit and of far-reaching results the Lincolin-Douglas de- bates stand among the momentous events of all nations and of all ages. AN EASTERN REPORTER'S VIEW OF WESTERN STUMP SPEAKING. "It is astonishing how deep an interest in politics this people take. Over long weary miles of hot and dusty prairie the processions of eager partisans come — on foot, on horsebock, in wagons drawn by horses or mules: men, women, and children, old and young: the half sick, just out of the last 'shake': children in arms, infants on the maternal breast, pushing on in clouds of dust and beneath the blazing sun: settling down at the town where the meeting is, with hardly a chance for sitting, and even less opportunity for eating: waiting in anxious groups for hours at the places of speaking, talking, discussing, litigious, vociferous, while the war artillery, the music of the bands, the waving of banners, the huzzai of the crowds, as delegation after delegation appears: the cry of the peddle\ -^ending all sorts of waies. from an infallible cure of 'agur' to a monster wt. "t* melon in slices to suit the purchasers — combine to render the occasion a scene of confusion and commotion. The hour of one arrives and a perfect rush is made for the 12 grounds; a column of dust is rising to the heavens and fairly deluging those who are hurrying on througL it. Then the speakers come with flags, and banners, and music, surrounded by cheering partisans. Their arrival at the grounds and immediate approach to the stand is the signal for shouts that rend the heavens. They are introduced to the audience amidst pro- longed and enthusiastic cheers; they are interrupted by frequent applause; and they sit down finally amid the same uproarious demonstration. The audience sit or stand patiently throughout, and, as the last word is spoken, make a break for their homes, first hunting up lost members of their families, getting their scattered wagon loads together, and, as the daylight fades away, entering again upon the broad prairies and slowly picking their way back to the place of beginning." — Special correspondence from Charleston, Illinois, to the New York Post, Sept. 24, 1858. AS A REPUBLICAN REPORTER SAW IT. (Special Correspondence of the- Missouri Democrat, a Republican Paper.) St. Louis, Wednesday, Sept. 29, 1858. A brief visit to our sister State of Illinois, will convince anyone who may be skeptical on the subject, that the temperature of the political atmosphere east of the Mississippi, is of tropical intensity. The excitement pervaded all sections of the State and all classes of its citizens. We, in Missouri, are no strangers to political contests of a fierce and absoi'bing character, but the pending one in Illinois, surpasses anything we have ex- perienced. Our neighbors' minds are so wholly concentrated in the canvass, that one might say, they would not be sensible to the throes of an earthquake, any more than the Roman and Carthagenian armies were at Thrasimene. :{; ^ 4: H: ^ ^ ^ We put up at the St. Nicholas, where we met Mr. Lincoln next morning. No two men could exhibit a stronger contrast than he and Douglas. The contrast is so marked, morally and intellectually, as physically. Douglas is short and thick; Lincoln is tall and slender. The former is fleshy and ruddy in the face; the latter is spare, and his complexion dark. He is considerably over six feet, and hence the sobriquet of Long Abe. His weight at present is one hundred and sixty-eight pounds — several pounds more than it was when he commenced his canvass. He speaks in a genial, humorous style, and eschews rant and boisterous declamation, while Douglas seldom utters anything else. He is scrupulous in his statement of facts, and treats his opponent with a deference which the latter is in- capable of reciprocating. Judging from the speech which Lincoln delivered that day, I should think he, more than any public man of the present time, infuses the milk of human kindness, and the frankness and courtesy of a gentleman of the old school into his discussions. He says nothing calculated to wound the feelings of Douglas, except the feelings of ambition, and that his arguments sorely wound. He wins his way rather than forces it, while his opponent deals in exaggerated statements, glaring sophistries, and coarse, fierce declamation. Douglas has cast his fortunes on a sentiment — the antipathy of the white to the black race, and he spares no effort, and disregards all considerations of justice or honesty in his labors to blacken the Republican party with the odium of negro equality. He is conscious that all debates on the acknowledged doctrines of both parties must result in his discomfiture, and consequently the staple of his speeches is a tirade of vulgar demagogism, as slanderous as it is absurd. Whatever incidental topics he may treat, it will be found that the substance of his speeches- in this canvass is an invocation of prejudice — a prosecution of the Republican party for sentiments which they repudiate, and from which their dogmas vindicate them completely. Lincoln, on the contrary, confines himself to the record, and measures the language in which he enforces his charges against Douglas and the National Democratic party. He has not once dur- ing the canvass suffered himself to be betrayed into exaggeration or vindi- 13 cativeness, nnuh less into acerbity of temper; whereas Douglas has fallen into an impotent passion several times, and expressed himself in disgusting epithets applied to his opponents. When the time came for going to Jacksonville, Lincoln and Blair were induced by their admiring friends at Springfield into a carriage which took up its appointed place in the procession that marched to the depot. From an early hour in the morning Springfield had been agitated with the note of preparation. The reveille was played at six o'clock in the square which surrounds the capitol. Flags and music, and the movements of men in uniform, and other signs showed that the day was to be a gala-day. The special train for the occasion was not capable of carrying one-third of those who were going to the meeting. A delay of an hour ensued, for the managers of the railroad had to tax all their resources to furnish the requisite number of cars. Not less than a thousand persons went from Springfield to Jacksonville. The train was as long a passenger train as I ever saw. We enumerated Republican delegations at every intermediate town, and crowds of spectators who cheered lustily for Lincoln. The adjoining counties of Sangamon and Morgan, through which we passed, and in which Springfield and Jacksonville are respectively situated, are in a high state of cultivation. The country is level and the soil a dark rich loam. The hedges of osage orange, which are numerous, and which promise before long to surround every field, are a novel and a very pleasing feature. Their beauty as well as utility is remarkable in a treeless prairie. No resident of a slave state could pass through the splendid farms of Sanga- mon and Morgan, without permitting an envious sigh to escape him at the evident superiority of free labor. In the slave states, it would seem, that man and the soil which he cultivates are enemies. It would seem that he must extort its produce as the tax-gatherer extorts tribute from a conquered but hostile people. In the free states on the contrary the soil seems to shower its wealth upon the cultivator with a most generous and royal bounty. It brings forth kindly all abundance, and smiles upon him in all the four seasons. The dumb earth itself seems to wear a cheerless aspect, and to yield its wealth charily and reluctantly to slave labor. The reception which Lincoln and Blair received at Jacksonville, was cordial and magnificent. The street which leads from the depot to the public square, was filled with people on foot, on horseback, and in vehicles, with a multitude of devices, mottoes, flags, etc. The procession might be said without any stretch of fancy, to bear a striking similitude to an army with banners. The sidewalks were crowded, and mainly with the fair sex. The streets of the square were also crowded, and fair faces shone in all the windows, and white kerchiefs were waved by white hands. Any estimate of the numbers can only be conjectural. There were thousands there, but whether ten, fifteen or twenty, I was unable to determine. Prominent friends of Douglas, admitted that it was a larger meeting than that which their leader had, and they tried to account for it by the Fair which was to commence next day, and which they said had brought many strangers to town. Whether this circumstance contributed to the magnitude and spirit of the demonstration, I am unable to say; but that the demonstration was the most remarkable and colossal one I hereby atfirm. That it was superior to the Douglas demonstration which preceded it, is conceded by all who witnessed both. What rendered it so remarkable to me, was the extent to which the ladies participated in it, and the conspicuous part which was assigned to them in programme. We behold the revival of the customs of classic antiquity in our electioneering tactics. Young and beautiful virgins clothed in white and crowned with wreaths of leaves and flowers, are seen in our political processions. American politics are reviving those ceremonies, and borrowing those influences, which the priests of Diana found so graceful and impressive. There were two barge-shaped vehicles in the procession at Jacksonville, each containing a bevy of fair young girls, numbering some twenty or thirty. Those in one wore the chaste ornament of the wreath, and carried small flags in their hands which they waved incessantly, like so 14 xaanj' goddesses of liberty. Those in the other vehicle could boast of some- what riper charms. They wore purple velvet hats, all of the same pattern, and as they passed, you would think their beauty would have entitled them to ride with the dark-browed Cleopatra in her golden barge upon the Nile. There besides, dashing equestriennes, who witched the young men with graceful horsemanship. Indeed, I question if any political meeting in the country has brought out more beautiful women or more of them than the meeting in Jacksonville, Monday. By subsequent inquiry, I learned that the place has long been famous for the charms of its female population. HOW DOUGLAS REACHED ILLINOIS. From a Speech at Winchester, Illinois, Aug, 7, 1858. "Twenty-five years ago, I entered this town on foot with my coat on my arm, without an acquaintance within a thousand miles and without having where I could get money to pay a week's board. Here I made the first six dollars I ever earned in my life, and obtained the first regular occupation that I ever pursued. For the first time in my life, I then felt that the responsibilities of manhood were upon me, although I was under age; for I had none to advise with, and knew no one upon whom I had a right to call for assistance or for friendship. Here I found the then settlers of the country my friends. My first start in life was taken here; not only as a private citizen, but my first election to public office by the people was conferred upon me by those whom I am now addressing, and by their fathers. A quarter of a century has passed, and that penniless boy stands before you with his heart full and gushing with the sentiments which such associations and recollections necessarily inspire." — Philadelphia North American, Aug. 19, 1858. THE GREAT DEBATE. (From "The Crisis.") It was but a few minutes' walk to the grove where the speaking was to be. And as they made their way thither Mr. Lincoln passed them in a Conestoga wagon drawn by six milk-white horses. Jim informed Stephen that the Little Giant had had a six-horse coach. The grove was black with people. Hovering about the hem of the crowd were the sunburned young men in their Sunday best, still clinging fast to the hands of the young women. Bands blared "Columbia, Gem of the Ocean." Fakers planted their stands in the way, selling pain-killers and ague cures, watermelons and lemonade. Jugglers juggled, and beggars begged. Jim said that there were sixteen thousand people in that grove. And he told the truth. * * ^c * * * * In the midst of that heaving human sea rose the bulwarks of a wooden stand. As they drew near their haven, a great surging as of a tidal wave swept them off their feet. There was a deafening shout, and the stand rocked on its foundations. Before Stephen could collect his wits, a fierce battle was raging about him. Abolitionist and democrat, free soiler and squatter sov, defaced one another in a rush for the platform. The com- mitteemen and reporters on top of it rose to its defence. Well for Stephen that his companion was along. Jim was recognized and hauled bodily into the fort, and Stephen after him. The populace were driven off, and when the excitement died down again, he found himself in the row behind the reporters. Young Mr. Hitt* paused while sharpening his pencil to wave him a friendly greeting. Stephen, craning in his seat, caught sight of Mr. Lincoln slouched into one of his favorite attitudes, his chin resting in his hand. * Robert R. Hitt a reporter for the Chicago Press and Tribune. 15 But who is this, erect, aggressive, searching with a confident eye the wilderness of upturned faces? A personage, truly, to be questioned timidly, to be approached advisedly. Here indeed was a lion, by the very look of him, master of himself and of others. By reason of its regularity and masculine strength, a handsome face. A man of the world to the cut of the coat across the broad shoulders. Here was one to lift a youngster into the realm of emulation, like a character in a play to arouse dreams of Wash- ington and its senators and great men. For this was one to be consulted by the great alone. A figure of dignity and power, with magnetism to compel moods. Since, when he smiled, you warmed in spite of yourself, and when he frowned the world looked grave. The inevitable comparison was come, and Stephen's hero was shrunk once more. He drew a deep breath, searched for the word, and gulped. There was but the one word. How country Abraham Lincoln looked beside Stephen Arnold Douglas! Had the Lord ever before made and set over against each other two such different men? Yes, for such are the ways of the Lord. i>f ***** i^ There was a hush, and the waves of that vast human sea were stilled. A man — lean, angular, with coat tails flapping — unfolded like a grotesque figure at a side-show. No confidence was there. Stooping forward, Abraham Lincoln began to speak, and Stephen Brice hung his head, and shuddered. Could this shrill falsetto be the same voice to which he had listened only that morning? Could this awkward, yellow man with his hands behind his back be he whom he had worshipped? Ripples of derisive laughter rose here and there, on the stand and from the crowd. Thrice distilled was the agony of those moments! But what was this feeling that gradually crept over him? Surprise? Cautiously he raised his eyes. The hands were coming round to the front. Suddenly one of them was thrown sharply back, with a determined gesture, the head was raised, — and — and his shame was forgotten. In its stead wonder was come. But soon he lost even that, for his mind was gone on a journey. And when again he came to himself and looked upon Abraham Lincoln, this was a man transformed. The voice was no longer shrill. Nay, it was now a powerful instrument which played strangely on those who heard. Now it rose, and again it fell into tones so low as to start a stir which spread and spread, like a ripple in a pond, until it broke on the very edge of that vast audience. ******* That short hour came all too quickly to an end. And as the Moderator gave the signal for Mr. Lincoln, it was Stephen's big companion who snapped the strain, and voiced the sentiment of those about him. Standing up, the very person of the Little Giant was contradictory, as was the man himself. His height was insignificant. But he had the head and shoulders of a lion, and even the lion's roar. What a contrast the ring of his deep bass to the tentative falsetto of Mr. Lincoln's opening words! If Stephen expected the judge to tremble, he was greatly disappointed. Mr. Douglas was far from dismay. * * * * * •"• It only remains to be told how Stephen Brice. coming to the Brewster House after the debate, found Mr. Lincoln. On his knee, in transports of delight, was a small boy, and Mr. Lincoln was serenely playing on the child's Jew's-harp. Standing beside him was a proud father who had dragged his son across two counties in a farm wagon, and who was to return on the morrow to enter this event in the family Bible. 4- ***** • This Lincoln of the black loam, who built his neighbor's cabin and hoed his neighbor's corn, who had been storekeeper and postmaster and flat- boatman. Who had followed a rough judge dealing a rough justice around a rough circuit: who had rolled a local bully in the dirt: rescued women from insult : tended the bedside of many a sick coward who feared the judgment: told coarse stories on barrels by candlelight (but these are pure i6 beside the vice of great cities); who addressed political mobs in the raw, swooping down from the stump and flinging embroilers east and west. This physician who was one day to tend the sick bed of the Nation in her agony; whose large hand was to be on her feeble pulse, and whose knowledge almost divine was to perform the miracle of her healing. So was it that the physician himself performed his cures, and when his work was done, died a martyr. Abraham Lincoln died in His Name. — From Mr. Winston Churchill's novel, "The Crisis," copyright, 1901, by The Macmillan Company. THE DEBATE AND THE DEBATERS, BY COL. CLARK E. CARR. "Yet, while the Republicans instinctively turned to Mr. Lincoln in this emergency, they still had misgivings as to whether he was equal to the task of meeting Douglas. Curiously, even yet very few in Illinois had come to regard Mr. Lincoln as what we call a great man. How could so homely, plain, simple, unpretentious, and droll a man be great, He was simply one of the common people; that was all." Outside of Illinois, Mr. Lincoln was then but little known. Less than a year before the Lincoln and Douglas debates, he spent a week at Cincinnati trying a lawsuit in company with Edwin M. Stanton, afterwards the great war secretary during the rebellion. Reverdy Johnson was the attorney on the other side of the case. These two great men, Stanton and Johnson, were well known. Lincoln was not; he stayed in Cincinnati a week, moving freely about, yet not twenty men knew him personally, and not a hundred would have known who he was had his name been spoken. Mr. Stanton afterwards described him, from his impressions of that first meeting, as "a long, lank creature from Illinois, wearing a dirty linen duster for a coat, the back of which the perspiration had splotched with stains that resembled a map of the continent." =<: « ^ 4c * * * "The people of Illinois were interested from the first. Soon the debates began to attract attention beyond the limits of the State. People in other sections asked, "who is the man Lincoln?" and wondered that they had not known something of him before. As the interest augmented, newspapers both east and west took up the speeches and published them in full. Their readers awaited their publications with eagerness and read them with avidity, and men on either side made their ai'guments their own. In every home, on every farm, in every tavern, store shop and mill, from New York to San Francisco, the statements and arguments were repeated and dis- cussed. "Did you see how Lincoln turned the tables on the 'Little Giant' with the 'Dred Scott decision?' asked one. 'Read it! read it aloud!' was the re- sponse. "See how Douglas answered him!" cried another; "read that!" and it was read. "The "Little Giant' is too much for your Springfield lawyer!" said one. "The 'Little Giant' has finally found his match!" another man responded. "It's all very well for Lincoln to talk his abolition sentiments In northern Illinois," said the Douglas men, after the Ottawa and Freeport debates. "You just wait until the 'Little Giant' trots him down into Egypt, and you'll laugh out of the other side of your mouth!" ******* "It was curious to look into the faces of the people who assembled to hear Lincoln ond Douglas in these famous debates. The debates were held in open air; and, unlike ordinary political meetings, both sides were fully represented. This fact, more than anything else, had prompted Mr. Lincoln to challenge the senator to meet him face to face. 'I want to reach the democrats,' he said to his friends. They are so prejudiced that they will not attend a re- publican meeting; but they will all come out to hear Douglas and this will give me a chance at them." ABRAHAM LINCOLN. Pure was thy life ; its bloody close Has placed thee with the sons of light, Among the noblest host of those Who perished in the cause of right. — ir. C. Bryant. We rest in peace, where his sad eyes Saw peril, strife, and pain. His was an awful sacrifice. And ours a precious gain. —Whittier. 17 As has been said, neither party spared either pains or expense to have its side represented in the most effective manner. The date of each joint debate was fixed long before it occurred and each party sought to make a more imposing demonstration in numbers and equipments than the other Meetings were held by each party in advance, at every cross roads within a radius of fifty miles of the place wher-e a joint debate was to occur, in order to awaken its adherents to the importance of being present to encourage and support its champion. They organized themselves into great delegations which rallied at convenient points and formed in processions of men and women, in wagons and carriages and on horseback, and, headed by bands of music, with fiags flying and hats and handkerchiefs waving, proceeded to the place of meeting. Many of these processions were more than a mile in length. As they marched, the air was rent with cheers — in the republican procession for "Honest Old Abe," and in the democratic for "The Little Giant." The sentiments printed in great letters upon the banners carried in each of these processions left no one in doubt which party it belonged to. Upon the banners of the Douglas processions were such sentiments as "Squatter Sovereignty." "Popular Sovereignty!" "Let the people rule!" "This is a white man's government!" "No nigger equality!" "Hurrah for the Little Giant!" The republican processions, on the other hand, carried banners with such mottoes as "Hurrah for honest old Abe!" "Lincoln the rail-splitter!" and "Giant Killer!" "No more slave territory!" "All men are created equal!" "Free Kansas!" "No more compromise!" ****** m Each party had great wagons or chariots specially fitted up, drawn by four, eight, and sometimes twenty horses, bearing young ladies each repre- senting one of the States of the Union. In the republican processions one of these young ladies was usually dressed in mourning, to represent Kansas. Over the young ladies in a Douglas chariot was displayed a banner bearing the sentiment, "Fathers protect us from negro husbands." As the processions came into town, they were met by marshals of their respective parties, on horseback, and conducted to their meeting places, greeted, as they passed through the streets, by cheers from their own parties and jeers from their opponents, which were answered in the same spirit. Finally they all as- sembled before the grand stand; seats could be provided for comparatively few, and the most of the people were standing. Democrats and republicans were packed into a solid mass together, good-naturedly talking and chaffing each other. Upon the stage were seated prominent men of both parties. A chairman and secretary, and time-keepers who had previously been agreed upon, were early in their seats, but made no effort to restrain the great crowd until after the speakers had arrived and received the deafening applause of their followers. It was a curious sight when the contestants ascended to their places on the platform — Lincoln was so tall and Douglas so short, Lincoln so angular and Douglas so sturdy, Lincoln so spare and Douglas so compact and rotund. They alternated in opening and closing the debates — the opening speaker an hour, his competitor following with an hour and a half, and the opening speaker closing with half an hour. Every moment of time was important to each speaker. The debate opened at precisely the moment fixed upon, and the moment a speaker's time expired he was called by the time keepers, after which he could only finish the sentence he had begun. (Col. Clark E. Carr in "The Illini." by permission of A. C. McClurg: & Co.. Chicago.) -2 D i8 THE BIRTHPLACE OF STEPHEN A. DOUGLA^. BY JOSEPH WALLACE. Brandon Vt., April 14, 1871. To the Editor of the State Register. "But to an Hlinoisan Brandon is only of special interest from its association with the early life of Stephen A. Douglas. I strolled this morning through the old cemetery where the father of the senator was buried. On a plain stone of bluish marble at the head of his grave is this simple inscription: Dr. Stephen A. Douglas, 'died July 13, 1813, in the 32d year of his age." By his side lie the remains of his (the doctor's) father and mother, the former of whom deceased in 1829, aged 69, and the latter in 1812, in the 56th year of her age. Benajah Douglas, the grandfather of the senator, was one of the earliest settlers of the village. He was a farmer by occupation, and ac- cumulated considerable property for his day. I am told, however, by an old and well informed resident of this place, that the senator's talents were main- ly inherited from his grandmother, Martha Douglas, who is said to have been a woman of more than ordinary intellect and force of character. I also visited the house were Stephen A. Douglas was born, and where his father died. It is a plain little brown frame, and one and a half stories high, and has been owned and occupied by a family of the name of Hyatt for about forty years. The front portion of the building has undergone but little alteration since the date of Mr. Douglas' birth. It will be remembered that the widow of Doctor Douglas, shortly after his death, removed to a farm a few miles in the country, which she and her brother had jointly inherited from their father, and there remained until her second marriage, when the family moved to Ontario county. New York. As I stod here in the midst of this quiet New England town, before the modest mansion where Senator Douglas first saw the light of day, I thought of the wonderful life of this wonderful man — how he was cradled, and passed his boyhood in obscurity among these verdant hills and mountains; of his transition hence to Canandaigua, New York, and schooling there; of his sub- sequent removal to Cleveland, Ohio, and entrance ' upon the study of law; of his tedious and toilsome journey southward and westward, down the Ohio and up the Mississippi to St. Louis, and thence to Jacksonville; of his advent in Winchester, Illinois, in the character of a pedagogue; of the com- mencement of his marvelous public career at the early age of twenty-two; of the rapidity with which he ascended the rounds of the ladder of political distinction until he reached a seat in the senate of the United States, and there, from the theater of his great fame, for fourteen years, spoke to the toiling millions of his admiring countrymen, with a power, eloquence and effect rarely equalled or surpassed. I thought, too of his many journeys back and forth over the land; of the peculiar magnetism of his personal presence, and the talismanic touch of his hands; of his memorable senatorial campaign with his great rival, Lincoln, in 1858, and of his still more memor- able canvass for the presidency in 1860; and I also thought of the parting between mother and son when the young Vermonter first started out in the world. The morning young Douglas left the house on the old Granger farm his mother walked with him down to the gate that opened out into the lane and into the United States senate and put her arms around her boy's neck and kissed him good-bye. "When are you coming back to see your old mother?" she asked of him. "On my way to congress," was his prophetic reply. There is a Patmos that rises across the way of some mortals. A good many years went by and the faithful mother used to go down to the gate of the lawn and look along the lane and go back again unconsoled. One day she saw a man coming and, though he had grown and had some of that tired look in his face which the west imprinted on its young men, the woman knew that was her boy. He held in his hand his certificate of elec- tion to the lower house of the national congress from the district in which 19 he lived in Illinois. He was on his way to congress. Long years after this, when the young man had scars on his political armor, made in contest with the giants of those days, and when he was in the race for the white house wreath and the press of the opposition was vindictive in its attacks upon him. Douglas stopped on his return from Washington to visit his mother, who had in the meantime moved up near the Canadian border. The wagon roads were filled with the plain people of that section who assembled at the station to meet the presidential candidate. An old woman threw her arms about the neck of her boy in the presence of the multitude and cried out: "Ah, they do not know my boy as I do, or they would not say what they do about him," referring to the attacks of the opposition. And the son, forget- ting for the moment that he was in a presidential contest, embraced the old lady and responded in the hearing of the concourse, "Thank God, I have found my mother." '' STEPHEN A. DOUGLAS. BY SAMUEL P. ORTH. His father was a skilful physician, and his mother a woman of unusual mental prowess. The father died when Stephen was only two months old. A bachelor brother of the widow provided a home for them. Stephen attended the village school and grew into a reckless little dare-devil, who would swim the mill-pond to spite his teacher and pommel his playmates for sheer love of combat. He was a bright boy with his books, and wished to go to college. But his uncle was "close," and instead of going to college Stephen, at the age of fifteen, was apprenticed to a cabinet maker in Middle- bury. His master w^as a good-natured deacon, who allowed the apprentice boy time to read his favorite books, the lives of Napoleon and of Caesar and of Alexander, heroes whose traditions he wove into every phase of his own career. In truth he was the Little Napoleon of the village. He led the young people in combat and debate. The prophecy of his babyhood that he would grow into a great giant remained unfulfilled. He became the "Little Giant" instead, scarcely five feet in height, and while he weighed, tradition says, 14 pounds when he was born, he could scarcely summon 140 pounds when he developed into manhood. Nor was his health robust. Throughout his early life he was compelled to suffer bodily discomforts. But Stephen in spite of his pigmy stature and frail health was remarkably muscular and fond of a fight. ******* His muscular strength was phenomenal. The pygmy who was often held upon the knees of his clients or constituents, as they familiarly consulted with him, was as powerful as an ox. One day when boarding a Mississippi flat-boat he was annoyed by a great, brawling, rawboned braggart. "Who are you, my big chicken?" Douglas asked. "I am a high pressure steamer," the bully answered. "And I am a snag," said the judge as he picked up the fellow and pitched him into the mud. * * * * * 4: * In spite of his diminutive stature, he was handsome in appearance. His head w^as massive and covered with a magnificent shock of jet black hair, which he tossed back when speaking, with a kingly gesture. His features were large and well proportioned. His eyes were restless, nothing escaped their vigilance as they flitted from object to object, and when they fixed their gaze they were piercing. His voice was superbly adapted to the needs of outdoor speaking. When on the platform, or in the court room, his manner was bold and challenging. He never evaded a conflict. It was this leonine attitude, together with his tremendous powers of speech and his stunted height, that christened him early in his career as "The Little Giant." — Samuel P. Orth in "Five Great Americans" (by permission of Burrows Brothers.) 20 STEPHEN A. DOUGLAS. BY JOSEPH A. WALLACE, ESQ. (From The State Register, Springfield, Ills., April 19, 1885.) The person of Mr. Douglas has been often described. He was short and thick-set, being only five feet one inch in height. In his earlier life he was slender, but grew stouter as he grew older. His head was one of unusual size, and was covered with a thick mass of dark brown hair, inclined to curl and sprinkled with grey. His forehead was broad and full, rather than high; his face round and smoothly shaven, and his complexion a rich dark color. His eyes were large and of a darkish blue, and deeply set be- neath heavy eyebrows. His nose was thick and pugnacious; mouth wide and firmly set, and a chin oval and dimpled. He had a short neck, square shoulders, disproportionately short lower limbs, small, chubby hands and small feet. He generally dressed with neatness, though not always in good taste. The ensemble of his person was such that he could not be taken for the "glass of fashion or the mould of form;" but when standing on a platform, before an audience, he loked like an orator and a great man, as he really was. He was well styled the "Little Giant." In private and social intercourse, he was a person of the most engaging address and conversation. Indeed, his glittering success as a politician was due almost as much to the charm of his manners as to the superiority of his intellect. He captured the hearts of the masses, and led them as it were spellbound. "No one," says Judge Trumbull," ever gathered around more devoted followers, or more enthusiastic admirers, who were willing to do and dare more for another than were his friends for him." As a public speaker "he seemed to disdain ornament, and marched right on against the body of his subject with irresistible power and directness." His style was declamatory, and he always spoke under the infiuence of strong emotion. His voice was one of unusual compass, not musical nor capable of a great variety of inflections, but deep and full, and "swelling into occasional clarion blasts toward the close of an important period." He made no pretensions to the character of a wit, yet some of his terse sayings have the genuine Attic flavor." NASBY'S DESCRIPTION OF LINCOLN. The first time I saw the great and good Lincoln (alas! that "great" and "good" cannot be more frequently associated in speaking of public men) was at Quincy, 111., in October — I think it was — 1858. It was at the close of the greatest political struggle this country ever witnessed. Stephen A. Douglas was the acknowledged champion of the democratic party, a position he had held unquestioned for years. He came into his heritage of leader- ship at an unfortunate time, just when the scepter was departing from the organization which he had headed, but he was especially unfortunate in being pitted against the most honest statesman in the opposition, a man upon whose face the Creator had set the assurance of absolute, unselfish integrity — of one whose outward seeming was a true index of the inward man. Douglas was perhaps as honest as politicians usually are; he had doubtless worked himself up to the point of actually believing the lies which he had fashioned to subserve his own ends; but Lincoln had never so deceived himself. He was absolutely honest — honest all the way through — and in face and manner satisfied all men that he wa's so. What might happen to him never influenced either his advocacy or opposition of any measure that might come before the people. I found Mr. Lincoln in a room of a hotel, surrounded by admirers, who had made the discovery that one who had previously been considered merely a curious compound of genius and simplicity was a really great man. When Lincoln was put forward as the antagonist of the hitherto invincible Douglas, it was with fear and trembling, with the expectancy of defeat; but this 21 mature David of the new faith had met the Goliath of the old, and had practically slain him. He had swept over the state like a cyclone — not a raging, devastating cyclone, the noise of which equaled its destructive power, but a modest and unassuming force, which was the more powerful because the force could not be seen. It was the cause which won, but in other hands than Lincoln's it might have failed. Therefore, wherever he went crowds of admiring men followed him, all eager to worship at the new shrine around which such glories were gathering. I succeeded in obtaining an interview with him after the crowd had de- parted, and I esteem it something to be proud of that he seemed to take a liking to me. He talked to me without reserve. It was many years ago, but I shall never forget it. He sat in the room with his boots off, to relieve his very large feet from the pain occasioned by continuous standing; or, to put it in his own words: "I like to give my feet a chance to breathe." He had removed his coat and vest, dropped one suspender from his shoulder, taken off his necktie and collar, and thus comfortably attired, or rather unattired, he sat tilted back in one chair with his feet upon another in perfect ease. He seemed to dis- like clothing, and in privacy wore as little of it as he could. I remember the picture as though I saw it but yesterday. Those who accuse Lincoln of frivolity never knew him. I never saw a more thoughtful face, I never saw a more dignified face, I never saw so sad a face. He had humor of which he was totally unconscious, but it was not frivolity. He said wonderfully witty things, but never from a desire to be witty. His wit was entirely illustrative. He used it because, and only because, at times he could say more in this way, and better illustrate the idea with which he was pregnant. He never cared how he made a point so that he made it, and he never told a story for the mere sake of telling a story. When he did it, it was for the purpose of illustrating and making clear a point. He was essentially epigrammatic and parabolic. He was a master of satire, which was at times as blunt as a meat-ax, and at others as keen as a razor; but it was always kindly except when some horrible injustice was its inspiration, and then it was terrible. Weakness he was never ferocious with, but intentional wickedness he never spared. — David B. Locke ("Petroleum V. Nasby") in Reminiscences of Abraham Lincoln, (by permission of North American Pub. Co.) CASSIUS M. CLAY ON LINCOLN AND DOUGLAS. His debate with Stephen A. Douglas not only showed great ability, but a liberal tendency. And though Douglas was the first popular speaker of his day, Lincoln won on the convictions of the people; so that, although Douglas was chosen the senator of Illinois, the debate, as taken down by stenographers, was published by the Whigs, and widely distributed as a campaign document. This brought Lincoln prominently before the nation as the liberal candidate. He was invited to speak in New York by the young Whigs and Liberals, and I met him again for the second time, and had on the cars a long talk with him on my favorite policy. Lincoln as usual was a good listener; and when I had accumulated all my arguments in favor of liberation he said: "Clay, I always thought that the man who made the corn should eat the corn." This homely illustration of his senti- ments has lingered ever in my memory as one of the most eminent argu- ments against slavery. — Cassius M. Clay in Reminiscences of Abraham Lin- coln (by permission of North American Publishing Co.) 22 THE CONTRAST BETWEEN LINCOLN AND DOUGLAS. BY GEN. JAMES B. FBY. Lincoln and his Illinois competitor, Stephen A. Douglas, formed a striking contrast. Douglas was low in stature, rotund in figure, with a short neck, a big bullet head, and a chubby face. His lips were forced into the fixed smile characteristic of the popular and well-satisfied public man of a period when political success depended largely upon what a man said, how he said it, and how he appeared in personal intercourse with the people; and not, as now, much upon what newspapers say of him and for him. Lincoln was tall and thin; his long bones were united by large joints, and he had a long neck and an angular face and head. Many likenesses represent his face well enough, but none that I have ever seen do justice to the awkwardness and ungainliness of his figure. His feet, hanging loosely to his ankles, were prominent objects; but his hands were more conspicuous even than his feet — due perhaps to the fact that ceremony at times compelled him to clothe them in white kid gloves, which always fitted loosely. Both in the height of conversation and in the depth of reflection his hand now and then ran over or supported his head, giving his hair habitually a disordered aspect. I never saw him when he appeared to me otherwise than a great man, and a very ugly one. His expression in repose was sad and dull; but with ever-recurring humor, at short intervals, flashed forth with the brilliancy of an electric light. I observed but two well-defined expressions in his countenance; one, that of a pure, thoughtful, honest man, absorbed by a sense of duty and responsibility; the other, that of a humorist so full of fun that he could not keep it all in. His power of analysis was wonderful. He strengthened every case he stated, and no anecdote or joke ever lost force or effect from his telling. He invariably carried the listener with him to the very climax, and when that was reached in relating a humorous story, he laughed all over. His large mouth assumed an unexpected and comical shape, the skin on his nose gathered into wrinkles, and his small eyes, though partly closed, emitted infectious rays of fun. It was not only the aptness of his stories, but his way of telling them, and his own unfeigned enjoyment, that gave them zest, even among the gravest men and upon the most serious occasions. — Gen. James B. Fry in Re- miniscences of Abraham Lincoln, (permission of the North American Pub- lishing Co.) DOUGLAS AND LINCOLN. BY STEPHEN B. WARDEN. Here are two men, of whom one is great and both are true as well as able. Lincoln represents, not greatly, but with marked ability, the least objectionable form of republicanism. Douglas represents, and greatly, the most patriotic form of democracy. Lincoln magnifies the interests of keep- ing territories now free in that condition, slightly estimating, or forgetting to preserve intact, the principle without which freedom in the territories or elsewhere would be a sheer impossibility. Douglas magnifying nothing, nor depreciating aught devotes himself to the elucidation and the preserva- tion of the principle on which all real republican or democratic interests must always be dependent. — Warden Stephen B. A voter's version of the life and character of Stephen Arnold Douglas. (Columbus, Ohio, 1860.) THE LINCOLN-DOUGLAS DEBATES. BY ALONZO ROTHSCHILD. The political careers of these two men started at about the same time and place. When Lincoln entered upon his first term in the Illinois Assembly at Vandalia, he met in the lobby a shrewd little Vermonter, four years his ^2> junior, who, notwithstanding extreme youth and briefness of residence in the West, was conducting among the members of the legislature what proved to be a successful canvass for the office of state's attorney for the first judicial district. The newcomer was Stephen A. Douglas. Identifying him- self with the dominant party, he became as pronounced in his democracy as Lincoln was in his Whiggism. On opposite sides of the next assembly, - both of them were elected to the legislature of 1836, — they clashed, from time to time, in tactics and debate. The antagonism thus started in Vandalia was transferred the following year to Springfield, where within a few months of each other, the young men took up their residence. Here differences Id character and temperament rather than in party affiliations, acted as a bar to the friendship, or even to the esteem, that is not uncommon between con- tending politicians. If Douglas took one side of a question, Lincoln might safely be looked for on the other; and their rivalry soon became a recognized factor in the spirited local contests of the day. * * * * * « « The Lincoln-Douglas debates, as they are called, were the most remarkable exhibitions of their kind in the history of the country. Never before nor since have two of its citizens engaged in a series of public discussions which involved questions of equal importance. Personal and purely local differ- ences were overshadowed, from the very beginning, by what the disputants had to say on issues so momentous that they were destined, within a few years, to plunge the country into civil war. Lincoln, accordingly, did not greatly exaggerate when he spoke, at Quincy, of the seven meetings as "the successive acts of a drama to be enacted not merely in the face of audiences like this, but in the face of the nation and ,to some extent, in the face of the world." To reconstruct these stirring scenes, in pen pictures, almost half a century after the curtain was rung down, is as much beyond onr power as to do justice by the actors, in any summary of their speeches. Only a careful reading of the 263 pages in which the debates have l)een preserved will convey an adequate idea of how brilliantly, from the intel- lectual point of view, both conducted themselves. Now Douglas appears to prevail, now Lincoln. One page persuades us that slavery is constitutional, and that each commonwealth should be allowed to have "the institution," or not, as it elects. "We turn the leaf, and lo! we are convinced that slavery is wrong, and ought, at least, to be restricted. The questions at issue in the debates, however, — their morals and their politics, — lie beyond the scope of our present inquiry. — Rothschild. Alonzo. Lincoln, Master of Men. (By permission of Houghton. Mifflin d- Co.) THE GREAT DEBATE. BY SAMUEL P. ORTH. Abraham Lincoln and Stephen A. Douglas were old time rivals. They had been admitted to the bar together, they had competed for political favor in the same communities, they had practiced law in the same courts on the same circuits, they had been rivals for the hand of the same maiden, and had been opponents in every political struggle since the days of Jackson. Douglas had become famous, Lincoln had remained obscure; Douglas was the leader of a great national party, Lincoln was the local organizer of a new and untried party; Douglas was the proud creator of the policy of populir sovereignty, not caring "whether the people voted slavery up or voted it down," Lincoln was the humble commentator on the text of the great declar- tion that "all men are created free and equal." Now these rivals met in. a contest that was destined to become one of the great and glorious events in our national history. It was not a rivalry of persons but of principles. Compromise and conviction met upon the same platform and struggled for the mastery. All semblance of a local contot immediately vanished, and the eyes of the nation were upon the rivals; their every word was caught up by eager ears, and every paper detailed their speech and action. Illinois became the political and moral battleground of all the land. The rivals were opposites, not alone in political convictions, but in methods, in physiognomy, in mental trait and in moral conceptions. Providence des- tined each to be the perfect embodiment of a principle, and nature had pre- pared each man for his ideal. Douglas, undersized, well knit and erect, his handsome head well poised, graceful of gesture and lordly of mein; Lin- coln, tall, gaunt, losely put together, awkward, called himself "the homliest man in Illinois." Douglas magnetic beyond resistance, prepossessing, good- natured, impulsive; Lincoln humble, straightforward, retiring, uncomplain- ing. Douglas a master of sophistry and fallacy, resorting to tricks and illusions, doing everything to win; Lincoln utterly incapable of deception, and so permeated with the truth that he feared misrepresentation more than defeat. Douglas in speech utterly destitute of wit, or of figure, he never quoted; neither did he hesitate, but his volubility was as unfailing as the rushing waters of a mountain torrent. His mastery over the audience was due to this irresistible onrush of words, and to his power to hide the real issue, to magnify small points into the ludicrous, to cro tte whole platoons of straw men out of mere phrases from his opponents' peech, and then pro- ceed to demolish them, with stupendous gusto, to tht- huge delight of his hearers. Douglas was superficial. He never fathomed the meaning of the Dred Scott decision; he was artificial, he never thought through the history of our country. What a contrast to Lincoln, who was nothing if not genuine, who was so profound, that his speeches will remain a perennial well-spring of civic and moral wisdom: And in speech, what a contrast! Lincoln was slow; his words were all carefully measured before they were spoken. He possessed the humor of Aesop, the wisdom of Franklin, the imagery of Burns, the diction of Emerson, the learning of Bacon, the morality of Paul. Douglas voluble, deceptive, onrushing; Lincoln logical, truthful, deliberative. These rivals, opposite in temperament and in method and in purpose, met in the arena of debate and crystallized the political sentiment of the Union. ****** ^ If these rivals could appear in joint discussion, Douglas would have to meet Lincoln upon an equality. His silent contempt and assumed superior- ity would be neutralized and his language tempered by the presence of Lin- coln. Douglas agreed to the debate. Seven meetings were arranged for, in as many towns, each speaker alternately to open and close, the opening speech to occupy an hour, the reply one hour and a half, the rejoinder one half hour. Douglas chose to open four debates, leaving Lincoln only three, but he submitted to this inequality with his usual good nature. Seven Illinois towns were made historic by these meetings. Not one external circumstance that could add significance to these occasions was wanting. For thirty miles around, the country emptied itself into each town. The multitudes came on foot, in wagons, by the train load. They camped in the open fields to await the great day. They marched, they sang, mey drank and made merry. Bands, torches, fireworks and banners made bizarre these encounters of the giants. The multitudes came in glee, they departed in silence; they gathered in jubilant excitement, they returned to fneir homes in sober thought; for Lincoln lived up to his simple purpose, "I want to convince the people." Douglas captivated the people, Lincoln sobered them. Douglas persisted in amplifying the ostensible assumptions of Lincoln; the answer was invariably the simple, convincing logic. Doug- las's speeches were turgid with misleading insinuations; Lincoln's answers were pregnant with prophecy. The campaign of enthusiasm closed with a mammoth rally, held in Chicago the night before election. Through rain and mud, the republicans marched in an enormous torchlight parade, so popular in those days; while the dem- ocrats gathered in a half dozen large meetings, where they awaited patiently in the rain, the arrival of Douglas, who addressed each meeting. Douglas had made a fortune in Chicago real estate, and his campaign cost him forty thousand dollars. Lincoln, out of his poverty, could give little more than his personal expenses. He confided to a friend that the campaign had cost him "nigh unto five hundred dollars." — Orth, Samuel P., Five American Politi- cians. (By permission of Burrow Bros., Cleveland, Ohio.) 25 AS AN EASTERN NEWSPAPER REPORTER SAW THEM. A writer for the New York Evening Post, who was present at the Ottawa debate and who listened for the first time to the two champions, gives his Im- pression of them in the following manner: Douglas and Ljncoln. Two men presenting wider contrasts could hardly be found as the repre- sentatives of the two great parties. Everybody knows Douglas, a short, thick- set burly man, with large round head, heavy hair, dark complexion, and fierce bull-dog look. Strong in his own real power, and skilled by a thousand con- flicts in all the strategy of a hand to hand or a general fight; of towering am- bition, restless in his determined desire for noteriety; proud, defiant, ar- rogant, audacious, unscrupulous, "Little Dug," ascended the platform and looked out impudently and carelessly on the immense throng whirh surged and struggled before him. A native of Vermont, reared on a soil where no slaves stood, came to Illinois as a teacher, and from one post to another had risen to his present eminence. Forgetful of the ancestral hatred of slavery to which he was the heir, he had come to be a holder of slaves and to owe much of his fame to his continued subservience to southern influence. The other — Lincoln — is a native of Kentucky, of poor white parentage; and from his cradle has felt the blighting influence of the poor and cruel shadow which rendered labor dishonorable, and kept the poor in poverty, while it advanced the rich in their possessions. Reared in poverty and to thf- humblest aspirations, he left his native State, crossed the line into Illinois and began his career of honorable toil. At first a laborer, splitting rails for a living — deficient in education, and applying himself even to the rudi ments of knowledge; he, too, felt the expanding power of his American manhood, and began to achieve the greatness to which he has succeeded. With great difficulty, struggling through the tedious formalities of legal lore, he was admitted to the bar, and rapidly made his way to the front rank of his profession. Honored by the people with oflSce, he is still the same honest and reliable man. He volunteered in the Black Hawk war, and did the State good service in its sorest need. In every relation of life, socially and to the State, Mr. Lincoln has been always the pure and honest man. In physique he is the opposite to Douglas. Built on the Kentucky type, he is very tall, slender and angular, awkward even, in gait and attitude. His face is sharp, large- featured and unprepossessing. His eyes are deep set, under heavy brows: his forehead is high and retreating, and his hair is dark and heavy. In repose, I must confess that "Long Abe's" appearance is not comely. Bur stir him up and the fire of his genius plays on every feature. His eye glows and sparkles, every lineament now so ill-formed, grows brilliant and ex pressive, and you have before you a man of rare power and of strong mag- netic influence. He takes the people every time, and there is no getting away from his sturdy good sense, his unaffected sincerity, and the unceasing play of his good humor, which accompanies his close logic and smooths the way to conviction— ^''etr York Evening Post. Aug. 27, 1S58. (Is this writer in error in any historical fact? Does he seem to try to be fair and impartial? Apply the test to other writers.) HOW DOUGLAS TRAVELED DURING THE CAMPAIGN. Labobs of Senator Douglas — A western correspondent gives a detailed statistical account of the labors of Senator Douglas in the recent canvass of Illinois, from which it appears that they were almost equal to the labors of Hercules. It seems that he has addressed his constituents in 57 counties. He met Mr. Lincoln in debate once in each congressional district: made .SO set speeches of from two to three hours in length; 17 speeches of from 26 twenty to forty -five minutes in length, in response to the serenades; and 30 speeches of about equal length, in reply to addresses of welcome. Of these speeches, all but two were made in the open air, and seven speeches were made or continued during heavy rains. To do this, Mr. Douglas crossed, from end to end, every railroad line in the State, excepting three, besides making long journeys by means of horse conveyance and steamboats; the road travel amounted to more than 5,227 miles. By boat he made almost the entire western side of the State, and all that portion of the Illinois river which is navigable by steamboats. — New York Times, 185S. AS DOUGLAS APPEARED AFTER THE CLOSE OF THE DEBATES. "As the great, though little, Douglas was stopping at the Tremont house, Chicago, only a few persons had the supreme honor of joining hands with the "favorite son," and your correspondent was among the number. He ap- peared in good health, quitely smoking a weed, and occasionally indulging in a chat with any one and every one who chose to converse with him. Per- haps you have never seen him; well, S. A. Douglas is a man standing five feet two or three, with a head big enough for six feet two, and a forehead prom- inent and intellectual enough for any man of any nation. His hair, which was brown, is thick and gray; his eye cool and gray; his nose not prominent, but striking; his mouth large and firm. His whole face is round, and seems too large even for such broad shoulders to support it. Small as he iSy you would choose him out of a crowd for a splendid model of intellectual culti- vation. He is small only in body — his head is a miracle of mind." — Chicago correspondence of Louisville, Ky., Democrat, Nov. 23, 1853. SELECTIONS FROM THE DEBATES. (condensed.) Lincoln on Slavery — "I suppose the real difference between Judge Doug- las and his friends and the Republicans is that the judge is not in favor of making any difference between slavery and liberty. Everything that emanates from him or his coadjutors in their course or policy carefully excludes the thought that there is anything wrong in slavery. If you will take the Judge's speeches and select the short and pointed sentences expressed by him — such as his declaration that he don't care whether slavery is voted up or down, you will see at once that this is perfectly logical. Judge Douglas declares that if any community wants slavery they have a right to have it. He can say that logically, if he says that there is no wrong in slavery; but if you admit that there is a wrong in it, he cannot' logically say that anybody has a right to do wrong." Douglas on Slavery — "Mr. Lincoln says he looks forward to a time when slavery shall be abolished everywhere. I look forward to a time when each state shall be allowed to do as it pleases. If it chooses to keep slavery for- ever, is not my business, but its own; if it chooses to abolish slavery, it is its own business, not mine. I care more for the principle of just government, the right of the people to rule, than I do for all the negroes in Christendom. I would not endanger the perpetuity of the Union, I would not blot out the inalienable rights of the white man for all the negroes that ever existed." Lincoln on the Menace of Slavery — "We are now far into the fifth year since a policy was initiated with the avowed object and the confident promise of putting an end to slavery agitation. Under the operation of that policy, that agitation has not only not ceased, but has constantly augmented. In my opinion it will not cease until a crisis shall have been reached and passed. 'A house divided against itself cannot stand.' I believe this govern- ment cannot endure half slave and half free. I do not expect the Union to be dissolved ; I do not expect the house to fall ; but I do expect it will cease 27 to be divided. It will become all one thing or all the other. Either the op- ponents of slavery will arrest the further spread of it, and place it where the public mind shall rest in the belief that it is in the course of ultimate extinc- tion, or its advocates will push it forward until it shall become alike lawful in all the states, old as well as new, north as well as south." Douglas on Lincoln's Sectionalism — "His first and main proposition I will give in his own language, scriptural quotatio"ns and all: A house divided against itself cannot stand." In other words, Mr. Lincoln asserts as a fund- amental principle of this government that there must be uniformity in the local laws and domestic institutions of each and all the States in the Union; and he therefore invites all the non-slaveholding States to band together, organize as one body and make war upon slavery in Kentucky, upon slavery in Virginia, upon the Carolinas, upon slavery in all the slaveholding states in this Union, and to persevere in that war until it is exterminated. He then notifies the slave-holding states to stand together as a unit and make an ag- gressive war on the free states of this Union with a view of establishing slavery in them all. Lincoln on the Dred Scott Decision — "The several points of the Dred Scott decision, in connection with Senator Douglas's 'care not' policy, constitute the piece of machinery in its present state of advancement. The working points of that machinery are: Firstly — That no negro slave and no descendant of a slave can ever be a citizen of any state. 'This point is made in order to deprive the negro of the benefit of that provision in the constitution which declares that "the citizens of each state shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of citizens of the several states." Secondly — That neither Congress nor a territorial legislature can exclude slavery from any United States territory. This point is made that in- dividual men may fill up a territory with slaves, without danger of losing them as property and thus enhance the chances of permanency to the institu- tion through all the future. Thirdly— That whether the holding a negro in actual slavery in a free state makes him free, the United States will not decide, but will leave to be decided by the courts of any slave state the negro may be forced into by his master. Put this and that together and we have another nice little niche, which we may ere long see filled with another Supreme Court decision declaring that the constitution does not permit a state to exclude slavery from its limits. Douglas on the Dred Scott Decision — "The decision of the highest tribunal known to the Constitution of the country must be final until it has been re- versed by an equally high authority. Hence, I am opposed to this doctrine of Mr. Lincoln by which he proposes to take an appeal from the decision of the Supreme Court upon this high constitutional question to a republican caucas sitting in the country. Yes, or any other caucus or town meeting whether it be republican, American or democratic. I respect the decisions of that august tribunal. I am a law-abiding man. I am free to say to you that in my opinion this government of ours was founded on a white basis. It was made by the white man, for the benefit of the white man, to be administered by the white man as they should deter- mine. I do not acknowledge that the states must all be free or must be all slave. I do not acknowledge that the negro must have civil and political rights everywhere or nowhere. He objects to the Dred Scott decision be- cause it does not put the negro in possession of the rights of citizenship on an equality with the white man. I am opposed to negro equality. I am in favor of preserving not only the purity of the blood but the purity of the government from any mixture or amalgation with inferior races." Lincoln on Douglas. — "Senator Douglas is of world-wide renown. All the anxious politicians of his party, have been looking upon him as certainly, at no distant day, to be the president of the United States. They have seen in his round, jolly, fruitful face, post-ofiices. land-offices, marshalships. and cabinet appointments, chargeships and foreign missions, bursting and sprout- ing out in wonderful exuberance, ready to be laid hold of by their irreedy 28 hands. With greedy anxiety they rush about him, sustain him, and give him marches, triumphal entries, and receptions beyond what even in the days of his highest prosperity they could have brought about in his favor. On the contrary, nobody ever expected me to be president. In my poor, lean, lank face, nobody has ever seen that any cabbages were sprouting out. These are advantages under which the Republicans labor. I was made the standard-bearer merely because there had to be some one so placed — I being in no wise preferable to any other of the twenty-five, perhaps a hun- dred, we have in the Republican ranks." Douglas on Lincoln, — "In the remarks I have made on this platform and the position of Mr. Lincoln upon it, I mean nothing personally disrespectful or unkind to that gentleman. I have known him for nearly twenty-five years. There were many points of sympathy between us when we first got acquainted. We were both comparatively poor boys, and both struggling with poverty in a strange land. I was a school-teacher in the town of Winchester, and he was a flourishing grocery-keeper in the town of Salem. He was more successful in his occupation than I was in mine, and hence more fortunate in this world's goods. Lincoln is one of these peculiar men who perform with admirable skill everything they undertake. I made as good a school- teacher as I could and when a cabinet-maker I made a good bedstead and tables although my old boss said I succeeded better with bureaus and secre- taries than with anything else; but I believe that Lincoln was always more successful in business than I, for his business enabled him to get into the legislature. I met him there, however, and had a sympathy with him, be- cause of the up-hill struggle we both had in life. He was then just as good at telling an anecdote as now. He could beat any of the boys wrestling, or running a foot-race, in pitching quoits or tossing a copper; and the dignity and impartiality with which he presided at a horse-race or fist-fight excited the admiration and won the praise of everybody that was present and par ticipated. I sympathized with him because he was struggling with difficul- ties and so was I." LINCOLN AND DOUGLAS AT FREBPORT, A Dialogue fob Boys. Characters: Abraham Lincoln, Stephen A. Douglas, two moderators, three reporters, and five or six political friends of each candidate. Scene — The stage should be set to represent an outdoor platform, with a plain uncovered table and with chairs as indicated in the diagram below. On the table, should be a pitcher of water and a glass, with two or three sheep-bound books. Two small tables for the reporters should be placed on the side of the stage furthest from the entrance. If desired a banner may be shown with the inscription "Stephenson is for Old Ahe" and another "hurrah for the Little Giant." Also, if desired, the characters may march on the stage in procession with fife and drums ahead, Douglas and Lincoln marching behind the moderators, the shouters for each following with cheers, and two of the reporters coming last. The third reporter remains outside until called for. STAGE SETTING. Audience. Reporters * * * Table Douglas Lincoln * * Moderators * * Douglas shouters Lincoln shouters ****** ****** 29 Cheers for each candidate should be given freely, with tossing of hats and waving of banners, before the beginning of each speech as well as after each speech. This should continue while candidates and moderators are taking their places, and subside only when the moderator has rapped sharply for order. The reporters cross to their tables and take notes constantly during the speaking, looking up only when interruptions come. Republican Moderator (Hon. Thos. J. Turner) : "Ladies and Gentlemen — " [The shouters have not yet taken their seats but are arguing ivith each other in the background. Now they cry, "Order! Silence!" and gradually take seats in their respective sides. The moderator waits until they are silent. 1 Moderator: "Ladies and Gentlemen. If the committee in charge of the arrangements for this memorable occasion could have been consulted, they would have planned better weather than greets us here today. But although the' skies are lowering and the rain occasionally threatening, I hope we shall all be patient and as comfortable as possible in this grove and listen to the eminent gentlemen who are to address us today. As the great crowds came in this forenoon in wagons and on special trains of as many as sixteen cars, and as I saw the long processions which escorted these two candidates to this grove, I asked myself, 'Under what other government would such a spectacle be seen? In what other part of this great country would these thousands of people leave their work in the midst of the busy season and travel miles and miles to hear discussed the political issues of the day?' Why? Because this is a most momentous campaign. It will be regarded in history as a canvass unequalled in the election of United States senators. These two men represent the great contest now being waged among thought- ful men of the republic and there is much more at stake than the election of either man to the senate. According to the agreement made in writing between Mr. Douglas and Mr. Lincoln before these debates began, each is alternately to open the debate in a speech of one hour. The other is to have an hour and a half in which to make a reply. The first speaker is then to be allowed half an hour in which to close the debate. The first of the series was held at Ottawa, in the Third Congressional District last Saturday. Today they are to have the second of the seven fixed debates in this, the First Congressional District. I ask that each side give the other a fair hearing and that the best of order be preserved in this vast crowd. Mr. Douglas had the opening speech at Ottawa. Mr. Lincoln has it today and it affords me great pleasure to introduce to the republicans of northern Illinois the champion of their principles and their candidate for the United States Senate — the Honorable Abraham Lincoln, of Springfield, who will open the debate." [Cheers.] \ Moderator takes out his watch to keep time and resumes his seat. Lincoln arises amidst shouts and cheers of the Lincoln men on the stage. Comes slowly forivard to a position beside the table, and takes a sip of water.'] Lincoln: "Ladies and gentlemen" — \ Cries of "Order! Keep quiet!" from the Douglas men to the cheering Lincoln men.. .Quiet is restored.} , Lincoln: "Before I begin speaking, I wish to inquire whether Mr. Hitt, the reporter is present." Republican Moderator [rising and coming foricard to the back of the table] "Is Mr. Robert Hitt, the stenographer, in the crowd about the stand?" Mr. Hitt \ appearing at the entrance to the hall if the stage has no setting or walking on the stage from the side entrance], "Gentlemen, I apologize for my delay but the crowd was so dense about the stand that only this moment have I been able to reach you. As you know I am not a heavyweight in body." (Takes his place at the reporter's table to take notes. Moderator resumes his seat.) Lincoln: "Ladies and Gentlemen: On Saturday last. Judge Douglas and myself first met in public discussion. He spoke one hour, I an hour and a half, and he replied for half an hour. The order is now reversed. I am to speak an hour, he an hour and a half, and then I am to reply for half an hour. I propose to devote myself during the first hour to the scope of 30 what was brought within the range of his half-hour speech at Ottawa. Of course there was brought within the scope in that half-hour's speech some- thing of his own opening speech. In the course of that opening argument Judge Douglas proposed to me seven distinct interrogatories. In my speech of an hour and a half, I attended to some other parts of his speech, and incidentally, as I thought, answered one of his interrogatories then. I then distinctly intimated to him that I would answer the rest of his interrogatories on condition only that he should agree to answer as many for me. He made no intimation at the time of the proposition, nor did he in reply allude at all to that suggestion of mine. I do him no injustice in saying that he occupied at least half of his reply in dealing with me as though I had re- fused to answer his interrogatories. I now propose that I will answer any of the interrogatories, upon condition that he will answer questions from me not exceeding the same number. I give him an opportunity to respond. (Turns toward Douglas and awaits reply. Douglas smiles and shakes his head.) The judge remains silent. I now say that I will answer his inter- rogatories, whether he answers mine or not; and that after I have done so, I shall propound mine to him. My answer as to whether I desire that slavery should be prohibited in all the territories of the United States, is full and explicit within itself, and cannot be made clearer by any comments of mine. So I suppose in regard to the question whether I am opposed to the acquisition of any more territory unless slavery is first prohibited therein, my answer is such that I could add nothing by way of illustration, or making myself better understood, than the answer which I have placed in writing. I now proceed to propound to the judge the interrogatories, so far as I have framed them. I will bring forward a new installment when I get them ready. I will bring them forward now, only reaching to number four. The first one is: — (Reading from a paper which he takes from his pocket.) Question 1. If the people of Kansas shall, by means entirely unobjection- able in all other respects, adopt a state constitution, and ask admission into the union under it, before they have the requisite number of inhabitants according to the English bill, — some ninety-three thousand, — will you vote to admit them? Q. 2. Can the people of a United States territory, in any lawful way, against the wish of any citizen of the United States, exclude slavery from its limits prior to the formation of a state constitution? Q. 3. If the Supreme Court of the United States shall decide that states cannot exclude slavery from their limits, are you in favor of acquiescing in, adopting, and following such decision as a rule of political action? Q. 4. Are you in favor of acquiring additional territory, in disregard of how such acquisition may affect the nation on the slavery question? I have been in the habit of charging as a matter of belief on my part that, in the introduction of the Nebraska bill into Congress, there was a con- spiracy to make slavery perpetual and national. I have arranged from time to time the evidence which establishes and proves the truth of this charge. I recurred to this charge at Ottawa. I shall not now have time to dwell upon it at very great length; but inasmuch as Judge Douglas in his reply of half an hour, made some points upon me in relation to it, I propose notic- ing a few of them. I pass one or two points I have, because my time will very soon expire: but I must be allowed to say that Judge Douglas recurs again, as he did upon one or two other occasions, to the enormity of Lincoln, — an insignificant individual like Lincoln, — upon his ipse dixit charging a conspiracy upon a large number of members of congress, the supreme court, and two presidents, to nationalize slavery. I want to say that^ in the first place, I have made no charge of this sort upon my ipse dixit. I have only arrayed the evidence tending to prove it, and presented it to the understanding of others, saying what I think it proves, but giving you the means of judging whether it proves it or not. This is precisely what I have done. I have not placed it upon my ipse dixit at all. On this occasion, I wish to recall his attention to a piece of evidence which I brought forward at Ottawa on Saturday, showing 31 that he had made substantially the same charge against substantially the same persons, excluding his dear self from the category. I ask him to give some attention to the evidence which I brought forward that he himself had discovered a "fatal blow being struck" against the right of the people to exclude slavery from their limits, which fatal blow he assumed as in evidence in an article in the Washington Union, published "by authority." I ask by whose authority? He discovers a similar or identical provision in thi^ Lecompton Constitution. Made by whom? The framers of that con- stitution. Advocated by whom? By all the members of the party in the nation, who advocated the introduction of Kansas into the union under the" Lecompton constitution. I have asked his attention to the evidence that he arrayed to prove that such a fatal blow was being struck, and to the facts which he brought for- ward in support of that charge, — being identical with the one which he thinks so villainous in me. He pointed it not at a newspaper editor merely, but at the president and his cabinet and the members of congress advocating tho Lecompton Constitution and those framing that instrument. I must again be permitted to remind him, that although my ipse dixit may not be as great as his, yet it somewhat reduces the force of his calling my attention to the enormity of my making a like charge against him. Gentlemen, I have finished. (Turning to Dotiglas.) Go on. Judge Douglas. {Tremendous cheering from Lincoln men.) Democratic Moderator (Col. Mitchell) (rising and coming fonoard to table): "Ladies and gentlemen: As moderator for the democratic side, it becomes my pleasant duty to introduce to you the champion of home rule for Kansas, the prince of debaters, whom twice we elected senator from Illinois and now propose to make it three times (cheers from Douglas men). the favorite son of the prairie state, Stephen A. Douglas." (Cheers.) Douglas (^arising and coming fortvard as Moderator retires) : Ladies and Gentlemen: "The silence with which you have listened to Mr. Lincoln during his hour is creditable to his vast audience, composed of men of various political parties. Nothing is more honorable to any large mass of people assembled for the purpose of a fair discussion, than that kind and respectful attention that is yielded not only to your political friends, but to those who are opposed to you in politics. First, he desires to know if the people of Kansas shall form a constitution by means entirely proper and unobjectionable, and ask admission into the union as a state, before they have the requisite population for a member of congress, whether I will vote for that admission. * * * it is my opinion that as she has population enough to constitute a slave state, she has people enough for a free state. I will not make Kansas an exceptional case to the other states of the union. I hold it to be a sound rule of universal applica- tion, to require a territory to contain the requisite population for a member of congress before it is admitted as a state into the union. The next question propounded to me by Mr. Lincoln is, can the people of a territory in any lawful way, against the wishes of any citizen of the United States, exclude slavery from their limits prior to the formation of a state constitution? Mr. Lincoln knew that I had answered that question over and over again. * * * It matters not what way the Supreme Court may hereafter decide as to the abstract question whether slavery may or may not go into a territory under the constitution, the people have the lawful means to introduce it or exclude it as they please, for the reason that slavery cannot exist a day or an hour anywhere, unless it is supported by local police regulations. Those police regulations can only be established by the local legislature: and if the people are opposed to slavery, they will elect representatives to that body who will by unfriendly legislation effectually prevent the introduc- tion of it into their midst. If, on the contrary, they are for it, their legisla- tion will favor its extension. Hence, no matter what the decision of the Supreme Court may be on that abstract question, still the right of the people to make a Slave Territory or a Free Territory is perfect and complete under the Nebraska bill. I hope Mr. Lincoln deems my answer satisfactory on that point. 32 The third question which Mr. Lincoln presented is, if the Supreme Court of the United States shall decide that a state of this Union cannot exclude slavery from its own limits, will I submit to it? I am amazed that Lincoln should ask such a question. (One of the Douglas supporters interrupting) "A school-boy knows better." "Yes, a school-boy does know better. Mr. Lincoln's object is to cast an imputation upon the Supreme Court. He knows that there never was but one man in America, claiming any degree of intelligence or decency, who ever for a moment pretended such a thing. The fourth question of Mr. Lincoln is, Are you in favor of acquiring addi- tional territory, in disregard as to how such acquisition may affect the Union on the slavery question? This question is very ingeniously and cunningly put. The Black Republican creed lays it down expressly, that under no circum- stances shall we acquire any more territory, unless slavery is first prohibited in the country. I ask Mr. Lincoln whether he is in favor of that proposition. Are you {addressing Mr. Lincoln} opposed to the acquisition of any more territory, under any circumstances, unless slavery is prohibited in it? That he does not like to answer. When I ask him whether he stands up to that article in the platform of his party, he turns, Yankee-fashion, and without answering it, asks me whether I am in favor of acquiring territory without regard to how it may affect the Union on the slavery question. I answer that whenever it becomes necessary, in our growth and progress, to acquire more territory, that I am in favor of it, without reference to the question of slavery; and when we have acquired it, I will leave the people free to do as they please, either to make it slave or free territory, as they prefer. I trust now that Mr. Lincoln will deem himself answered on his four points. He racked bis brain so much in devising these four questions that he exhausted himself, and had not strength enough to invent the others. As soon as he is able to hold a council with his advisers, Lovejoy, Farns- worth, and Fred Douglass, he will frame and propound others. {Lincoln shouters interrupting), "Good. Good." You Black Republicans who say "good," I have no doubt think they are all good men. I have reason to recollect that some people in this country think that Fred Douglass is a very good man. The last time I came here to make a speech, while talking from the stand to you, people of Freeport. as I am doing to-day, I saw a carriage — and a magnificent one it was — drive up and take a position on the outside of the crowd; a beautiful young lady was sitting on the box-seat, whilst Fred Douglass and her mother reclined inside, and the owner of the carriage acted as driver. I saw this in your own town. A Lincoln man interrupting, "What of it?" All I have to say of it is this, that if you Black Republicans, think that the negro ought to be on a social equality with your wives and daughters, and ride in a carriage with your wife, whilst you drive the team, you have perfect right to do so. I am told that one of Fred Douglass' kinsmen, another rich black negro, is now traveling in this part of the State making speeches for his friend Lincoln as the champion of black men. {A Lincoln man interrupting), "What have you to say against it?" All I have to say on that subject is, that those of you who believe that the negro is your equal and ought to be on an equality with you socially, politically and legally, have a right to entertain those opinions, and of course will vote for Mr. Lincoln. Now there are a great many Black Republicans" — (A Lincoln supporter, interrupting) , "Couldn't you modify it and make it brown?" Douglas: "Not a bit. I say there are a great many Black Republicans of you who do not know how this thing was done. {Lincoln men. interrupting) ; "Make it white! White Republicans! White! White!" {great clamor.) Douglas, {apparently losing his temper) "I wish to remind you that while Mr. Lincoln was speaking there was not a Democrat vulgar and blackguard enough to interrupt him. But I know that the shoe is pinching you. I am STEPHEN A. DOUGLAS. "There can be no neutrals in this war — only patriots or traitors." — Douqlas. May 1, 1861. 33 clinching Lincoln now and you are scared to death for the result. I. have seen this thing before, I have seen men make appointments for joint discus- sions, and the moment their man has been heard, try to interrupt and prevent a fair hearing of the other side. I have seen your mobs before, and defy your wrath. (Tremendous applause.) My friends, do not cheer, for I need my whole time. * * * i know Mr. Lincoln's object; he wants to divide the Democratic party, in order that he may defeat me and get to the Senate. Democratic Moderator: "Judge, your time is just expired." IDouglas bows and retires to his chair amidst prolonged Democratic cheer- in g.] Republican Moderator: "Mr. Lincoln has thirty minutes in which to close the debate. Let all be quiet and orderly." Lincoln: "My Friends: It will readily occur to you that I cannot, in half an hour, notice all the things that so able a man as Judge Douglas can say in an hour and a half; and I hope, therefore, if there be anything that he has said upon which you would like to hear something from me, but which I omit to comment upon, you will bear in mind that it would be expecting an impossibility for me to go over his whole ground. I can but take up some of the points that he has dwelt upon, and employ my half-hour specially on them. The first thing I have to say to you is a word in regard to Judge Douglas' declaration about the "vulgarity and blackguardism" in the audience, — that no such thing, as he says, was shown by any Democrat while I was speaking. Now, I only wish, by way of reply on this subject, to say that while I was speaking, I used no "vulgarity or blackguardism" toward any Democrat. The Judge has again addressed himself to the abolition tendencies of a speech of mine made at Springfield in June last. I have so often tried to answer what he is always saying on that melancholy theme, that I almost turn with disgust from the discussion, — from the repetition of an answer to it. I trust that nearly all of this intelligent audience have read that speech. If you have, I may venture to leave it to you to inspect it closely, and see whether it contains any of those "bugaboos" which frighten Judge Douglas. He says if I should vote for the admission of a slave state I would be voting for a dissolution of the Union, because I hold that the Union cannot permanently exist half slave and half free. I repeat that I do not believe this government can endure permanently half slave and half free; yet I do not admit, nor does it at all follow, that the admission of a single slave state will permanently fix the character and establish this as a universal slave nation. The Judge is very happy indeed working up these quibbles. His hope rested on the idea of visiting the great "Black Republican" party, and making it the tail of his new kite. He knows he was * * * expect- ing from day to day to turn Republican and place himself at the head of our organization. He has found that these despised "Black Republicans" estimate him by a standard which he has taught them none too well, hence he is crawling back into his old camp, and you will find him eventually installed in full fellowship among those whom he was then battling, and with whom he now pretends to be at such fearful variance." Republican Moderator \ tapping on the tahlel, "Mr. Lincoln, I am sorry to say that your half hour has expired." Lincoln supporters: "Go on! Go on! Lay him out cold! Go on!" (C/ieers.) Lincoln: "I cannot gentlemen, my time has expired." \ Great tipplause from Lincoln men.~\ \Bouglas immediately rises and very gravely walks off the stage surrounded by his followers cheering. Lincoln's men try to carry him off on their shoulders, notwithstanding his protests. They cheer boisterously, "Hurrah for Old Abe!" etc.] Note — If desired, one of the several songs printed in this pamphlet could be sung informally before or after the debate. Or it could be introduced effectively just after the conclusion of Mr. Lincoln's second speech by the -3 D 34 Republican moderator calling for order and saying, "Ladies and Gentlemen, before we disperse I have the pleasure of announcing that we have with us the celebrated Monmouth Glee Club which has done us good service during this campaign. They will now favor us with a selection." \ Lincoln cheers.] Or the Democratic moderator could say, "Ladies and Gentlemen, I am happy to say that the celebrated Douglas Singers of Chicago are ' on the grounds and will favor us with a selection." [Douglas cheers.] A LINCOLN CAMPAIGN SONG, 1858. OLD DAN TUCKER. We hear a cry increasing still, Lilje light it springs from tiill to hill — From Pennsylvania's State it leaps, And o'er the Buckeye valley sweeps. Get out of the way Stephen Douglas ! Get out of the way Stephen Douglas ! Get out of the way Stephen Douglas ! Lincoln is the man we want to serve us ! The Hoosler State first caught the cry, The Hawkeye State then raised It high, The Sucker State now waits the day, When Lincoln leads to victory ! Get out of the way, etc. Cheer up for vi'^tory's on its way, No power its onward march can stay. As well as to stop the thunder's roar, As hope for Douglas to serve us more. Get out of the way, etc. Then Freemen, rally, one and all. Respond to our brave leader's call ; Free Speech, Free Press, Free Soil, want we, And Lincoln to lead for Liberty ! , Get out of the way, etc. , — Illinois State Journal, Oct. 27, 18i8. A DOUGLAS SONG OF 1858. We won't vote for Lincoln, nor for one of his band, We'll stick to brave Douglas as long as we can. His name is arising from the east to the west. Since old Hickory Is gone, we think he's the best Through these hard times. Our Douglas is fearless — he cares for no man, He will stand by the Union as long as he can. Though Buck may oppose him. he'll force him to yield, To give up the fight and then leave the field. Through these hard times. — Chicago Times, Oct. S7. 1858. OH, YOU CAN'T GO TO THE CAPER, STEPHEN. Our sucker pole is planted. Our flag is now unfurled. For Abe we go undaunted. We proclaim it to the world. Te slanderers of Republicans Lay down your pen and paper. For Little Stephen's race is run — He cannot go the caper. And now huzzah, my lively lads. We'll take a noble stand In favor of our Statesman. The greatest of the land. The wood-chopper of Sangamo, Who dares our rights to maintain. And never will submit to A Douglas' selfish reign. From the Wide-Aioake Vocalist. A Repuhlican campaign song book of 1860. 35 "WIDE-AWAKE CLUR" SONG. (Tune — "A Wet and a Flowing Sea".) Oh, hear you not the wild huzzas That come from every State? For honest Uncle Abraham, The people's candidate? He is our choice, our nominee, A self-made man and true ; We'll show the Democrats this fall What honest Abe can do. Then give us Abe, and Hamlin, too. To guide our gallant ship. With Seward, Sumner, Chase, and Clay, And then a merry trip. I hear that Doug Is half inclined To give us all leg-ball, Preferring exercise on foot To riding on a rail. For Abe has one already mauled Upon the White House plan ; If once Doug, gets astride of that, He Is a used-up man. Then give us Abe, and Hamlin, too. To guide our gallant ship. With Seward, Sumner, Chase, and Clay, And then a merry trip. — Prom Hutchinson's Republican tiontjster. NEW NURSERY BALLADS. (Good for Little Democrats.) Sing a song of Charleston ! Bottle full of Rye ! All the Douglas delegates Knocked into a pi — For when the vote was opened, The South began to sing, "Your little Squatter Sovereign Shan't be our King" ! HI diddle, diddle! The Dred Scott riddle! The Delegates scatter like loons ! The Little Doug swears to see the sport. And the Southerners count their spoons. There was a little Senator Who wasn't very wise. He jumped into Convention And scratched out both his eyes ; .\nd when he found his eyes were out. With all his might and main, He bolted off to Baltimore To scratch them In again. THE BOY'S WISH. (From the W'Me-Axoalce Vocalist, a republican campaign song book of ISGO.) Song for Children. Air — If I were a Little Bird. If I were a man, six feet in my boots, I'd be at the ballot box, watching the votes ; Or out among the people with flags of starry blue, I'd have a happy time — say, would not you? Oh, I would make a stump-speech in the pleasant dell, The bob-o-Unk, my sexton, to ring his silver bell, Wood-flowers repeating the glory of the skies. Should clasp their green hands and smile with their eyes. I should cross the prairie, where the wild flowers bloom. And visit honest Lincoln In his western home ; And Its pulses are true as the tides of the main. For they say his heart is broad as the prairie's sea-like plain. 36 "A DOUGLAS TO THE FRAY." (A Campaign Song of 1858.) BY JOHN BROUGHAM. When Saxon raid, With brand and blade, O'er Scotia's borders came, And gave the land, With bloody hand, To the pillage and to flame ; 'Twas thus rang out The welcome shout, ' From mountain and from brae ; "God and our right ! Stand firm and fight ! A Douglas to the fray !" Oh never was Unworthy cause Linked with that rallying cry, To friends a spell, To foes a knell. Whene'er it pierx^ed the sky ; And as the shout. Rang fiercely out, Fate owned its conquering sway ; Stand firm and fight ! For truth and right ! "A Douglas to the fray !" On story's page. In every age, Through e^ery path of fame. In glory's round May still be found Enrolled, that deathless name. Speed as of old. The chieftan bold, Who bears it at this dav : Stand firm and fight. For truth and right ! "A Douglas to the fray !" — Qnincp, Til., Whig. Nov. IS, 1858. DOUGLAS' COMPLAINT. (From the Wide- Awake Vocalist, a republican campaign song book of 1860.) He punished me — in fight you see, And said I had the wrong of it ; For I am small and he is tall And that's the short and long of it. He split a rail through my coat tall. He quickly thrust the prong of It ; I'm five feet one, that lofty son Is six feet four and strong of It. UNCLE ABE. (From the Lincoln Campaign Songster, 1858.) (Tune — Nellie Ely.) Uncle Abe, Uncle Abe ! here we are again. We've got a platform now we think that will not bend or strain. Beat the drum, unfurl the flag, freedom is for all. And so we fling it to the breeze as in the ranks we fall. Chorus. Ho, Uncle Abe ! Listen Uncle Abe ! and see. We sing for you, work for you, hurrah for liberty ! Uncle Abe. we have tried, nnd we're found him true. We know that he is honest in the work he has to do. Uncle Abe has his faults and so h.ive other men. But in firmness for the Union, we'll not find his like again. THE LINCOLN MONUMENT. 37 Uncle Abe is the man for the work In hand ; He knows the ropes about the ship upon whose deck we stand; Waves may dash and winds may roar, but he'll guide us on, Till slavery's storm is over and port of peace is won. EMERSON ON LINCOLN'S LITERARY ABILITY. He is the author of a multitude of good sayings, so disguised as pleasant- ries that it is certain they had no reputation at first but as jests; and only later by the very acceptance and adoption they find in the mouths of millions, turn out to be the wisdom of the hour. But the weight and penetration of many passages in his letters, messages, and speeches, hidden now by the very closeness of their application to the moment, are destined hereafter to a wide fame. What pregnant definitiveness! What unerring common sense! What foresight! and, on great occasions, what lofty and more than national; what human tone! His brief speech at Gettysburg will not easily be surpassed by words on any recorded occasion. This and one other American speech, that of John Brown to the court that tried him, and a part of Kossuth's speech at Bir- mingham, can only be compared with each other and with no fourth. DEDICATION OF GETTYSBURG BATTLE FIELD. LINCOLN'S GREATEST LITERARY EFFORT. Four score and seven years ago "our fathers brought forth on this con- tinent a new nation conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal. Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation or any nation so conceived and so dedicated can long endure. We are met on a great battle-field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field as a final resting place for those who have gave their lives that the nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this. But, in a larger sense, we cannot dedicate — we cannot consecrate — we can- not hollow this ground. The brave ment, living and dead who struggled bore, have consecrated it far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us, the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly ad- vanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us — that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion: that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain; that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom; and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth? NOTB— In June, 1863. the Confederate forces invaded the Northern states and encountered the Federal forces at Gettysburg. Pennsylvania. June 29, 30 and July 1. in a contest which marked ' 'the high tide of the t'ivil war." Contrress purchased a portion of the battle-field for a ceftietery in which to bury the dead soldiers, and in November. 1863, at the dedication exercises, Lincoln delivered the above brief address. A LAST GLIMPSE OF THE RIVALS. DOUGLAS AT THE INAUGURATION OF LINCOLN. When the president-elect, on inauguration day, stepped out upon the plat- form that had been erected in front of the eastern portico of the capitol, he found the senior senator from Illinois among the distringuished men ^vho sat awaiting him. Mr. Lincoln, as if to add to the novelty of his situation, was dressed in fine clothes, of which for the moment, he appeared to be all 38 too conscious. In one hand he held a new silk hat; in the other, a gold- headed cane. What to do with them perplexed him. After some hesitation, he put the cane into a corner; but he could not find a place for the hat, which he evidently was unwilling to lay on the rough board floor. As he stood there in embarrassment, with the waiting multitude looking up curiously at him, his old rival came to his rescue. Taking the precious hat from its owner's hand, Douglas held it, while Lincoln took the oath of oflice and delivered his inaugural address. The incident, simple in itself, forms a dramatic climax to the lifelong competition between them. As Lincoln stands forth crowned with the highest honors to which their conflicting am- bitions had aspired, Douglas in the background, humbly holds the victor's hat. — {Rothschild, Alonzo, Houghton, Niffin & Co.) Note— Exactly three months later, Douglas died at his home in Chicago and a little over four years later Lincoln was assassinated in Washington. BURY ME IN THE MORNING. BY STEPHEN A. DOUGLAS'.- Bury me in the morning, mother, let me have the light Of one bright day on my grave, mother. Ere you leave me alone with the night ; Alone in the night of the grave, mother, 'Tis a thought of terrible fear,' And you will be here alone, mother. And stars will be shining here ; So bury me in the morning, mother, And let me have the light Of one bright day on my grave, mother. Ere I'm alone with the night. You tell me of a Saviour's love, mother, 1 feel it is in my heart But oh ! from this beautiful world, mother, 'Tis hard for the young to part. Forever to part, when here, mother, The soul is fain to stay ; For the grave is deep and dark, mother. And heaven seems far away. Then bury me in the morning, mother. And let me have the light Of one bright day on my grave, mother. Ere I'm alone with the night. -From the Life of Stephen A. Douglas, published at No. 37, Park Row, New York, 1861. LAST WORDS OF DOUGLAS. The Chicago Post has the following touching paragraph in regard to the last moments of Senator Douglas: "tell my chlldben to love and uphold the constitution." A few hours before his death, Senator Douglas revived from the condition of almost total unconsciousness in which he had lain for many hours. His mind seemed to resume its wonted faculties, and he conversed in a feeble voice with those around him. He expressed a knowledge that death was approaching. His devoted wife, still keeping her long and anxious vigils at his bedside, asked the dying statesman if he had any message to leave for .his children, Robert and Stephen. The question at first was not heard, but upon the wife's repeating it, his voice and frame seemed suddenly to possess new strength as he replied, "Tell my children to love and uphold the Constitution." Tney were almost the last words he spoke. A few moments afterwards, he desired to be raised higher upon the pillow in order that he might look out from his window. The wish was complied with. One of the physicians ex- pressed a doubt as to the ease of his position; he answered with feeble utterance. "It is comfortable." His eyes soon closed, his head sank upon the pillow, his lips faintly articulated "death — death — death!" and the spirit of life had departed. 39 Bibliography of the Lincoln-Douglas Debates. Abnold, Isaac Newton — The Life of Abraham Lincoln; debate; Chap. IX, pp. 139-152; few excerpts, good general description with anecdotes; Chicago: A. C. McClurg & Co., 1891. Blaine, James G. — Twenty years of Congress, 1861-1881: debate, Vol. I, pp. 143-1.50; good general sketch and comparison; good political view; Norwich, Conn: McHenry Bill Publishing Co., 1884. Brooks. Noah — Abraham Lincoln and the Downfall of American Slavery; debate. Chapter XIII, pp. 161-178; general description and excerpts; New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons, 1894. Browne. Francis F. — j. iie Everyday Life of Abraham Lincoln; debate, pp. 277-307; good sketch with anecdotes; New York and St. Louis: N. D. Thompson Publishing Co., 1886. Chittenden. L. E. — Abraham Lincoln's Speeches; debate, 117-181; extracts; New York: Dodd, Mead & Co., 1895. Hapgood. Norman. — Abraham Lincoln, the Man of the People. Debate: pp. 141-148. General, good. New York: The MacMillan Co., 1899. Herndon. WnxiAM Henry and Weik. .Jesse William. — Abraham Lincoln, the true story of a greaf life. With an introduction by Horace White. De- bate, V. 2 Chap. IV, pp. 88-132. Excellent contemporary account by Horace White who attended debates for the Chicago "Press and Tribune" for Lincoln side; few excerpts; description of campaign. New York: D. Appleton & Co., 1892. Lincoln, Abraham and Doitglas. Stephen Arnold. — The first Lincoln and Douglas debate at Ottawa, 111.. Aug. 21, 1858; Boston, 1897; (Old South leaflets, general ser.) V. 4, No. 85'; debate; text only. Lincoln. Abraham. — Speeches of Abraham Lincoln, Including inaugurals and proclamations. Selected and edited with an introduction and prefatory notes by G. Mercer Adam: New York: A. L. Burt Co., 1896; debate, pp. 94-223. Each debate prefaced by brief synopsis. Nkolay. ,Tohn G. and Hay. .Totin. — Abraham Lincoln; complete works; debate, challenge and arrangements for. Vol. I, pp. 273-277: Ottawa, 111.. Aug. 21, 1858, I. 277-305: Freeport. 111.. Aug. 27, 1858. I, 305-335; .Tonesboro. 111., Sept. 15. 1858, I, 335-369; Charleston. 111.. Sept. 18, 1858. I. 369-412: Galesburg, 111., Oct. 7, 1858, I, 425-455; Quincy, Til., Oct. 13. 1858, I, 456-48.5; Alton. 111.. Oct. 15, 1S58, I, 48.5-518. New York: The Century Co., 1894. Nicolay. John G. and Hay. John. — Abraham Lincoln: A History: dehnte. Vol. II, Chaps. VIII and IX: Analysis, excerpts and thorough narrative; New York: The Century Co., 1890. Oldroyd. Osboitrx Haaiiltne. — Words of Lincoln, including several hundred opinions of his life and character: debate, pp. 29-36: Lincoln excerpts: no comment: Washington: O. H. Oldroyd. 1895. Rothschild. Alonzo. — Lincoln. Master of Men: A Study of Character: debate, pp. 101-112: anecdotes and digest: Boston, 1906. ScHCT^z. Carl. — Abrahnm Lincoln: An Essay: debate, pp. 43-53; view of Dolitical situation and excerpts: Boston and New York: Houghton, Mifflin & Co., 1891. Republished 1899 in Riverside Literature Series. No. 133, April 5. 40 Tabbell, Ida M. — The Life of Abraham Lincoln drawn from original sources and containing many speeches, letters and telegrams; debate, Chap. XVIIL pp. 307-323; general description with quotations from those present; New York: The Doubleday & McClure Co., 1900. Washbukne, Elihu Benjamin. — Abraham Lincoln; His Personal History and Public Record; speech by Hon. E. B. Washburne, of Illinois, May 29, 1860; Washington, 1860; (36th Cong., 1st session House; appendix to the Congressional Globe; debate, pp. 377-380. Interesting speech, contemporary political views favorable to Lincoln; excerpts. Periodicals. Brown, William Garrett. — Lincoln's Rival. Atlantic; 89; 226. A good comparison of characters and analysis of situation. Recollections of the First Debate Between Lincoln and Douglas. — The Magazine of History, III; 77; debate, p. 77; anecdotes. Fine description of Lincoln's moral power in debate; New York: William Abbott, 1905. ScRipps, John. Locke. — The First Published Life of Abraham Lincoln; debate. Chap. VIII, pp. 67-83; good narrative, digest and selections; The Canbrook Press, 1900, Detroit, Mich. ScHUEz, Carl. — Abraham Lincoln. Atlantic: 67; 721; debate, 732-734. General sketch with analysis. ViLLARD, Henry. — Recollections of Lincoln. Atlantic: 93; 165. One or two quaint anecdotes of the Lincoln-Douglas debates. Washburne, E. B. — Abraham Lincoln in Illinois. North American Review: 141; 309. Sketch of Freeport debate. THE DOUGLAS MONUMENT.